<PAGE>
[Logo of Birmingham Steel Corporation Appears Here]
1999 Annual Report
<PAGE>
[LOGO OF BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION APPEARS HERE]
Dear Birmingham Steel Stockholder:
On August 18, 1999, a new era for Birmingham Steel Corporation began. That
was the date on which your Board of Directors unanimously approved a strategic
restructuring to focus the Company on its strong and profitable core mini-mill
and scrap operations.
Key elements of the restructuring include seeking to divest the SBQ (Special
Bar Quality) division, which became part of the Company when it acquired
American Steel & Wire Co. ("AS&W") in 1993; seeking to divest the Company's
50% interest in American Iron Reduction ("AIR"); and exploring our options
with regard to Pacific Coast Recycling ("PCR"), in which the Company has a 50%
ownership interest.
While implementation of the strategic restructuring is a complex process,
its purpose is simple: to better position the Company to achieve its
overriding objective of building the value of Birmingham Steel for you.
Our Core Operations
The Company's core mini-mill operations, which together provide industrial
customers a broad range of merchant and rebar products, include facilities in
Kankakee, Illinois; Joliet, Illinois; Birmingham, Alabama; Jackson,
Mississippi; Seattle, Washington; and Cartersville, Georgia. The Company's
core businesses also include scrap operations in Jackson, Mississippi and
Vancouver, British Columbia, and the Port Everglades Steel sales and
distribution business in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.
The strength and profitability of those core operations were clearly
reflected in our financial results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999.
The Company reported a consolidated net loss for the year, which was primarily
attributable to the SBQ division and our decision to pursue the strategic
restructuring. Nevertheless, despite continued adverse industry conditions,
including record-high import levels that constrained shipping levels and
reduced selling prices, your Company achieved strong full-year results
throughout its core merchant and rebar businesses.
For the year, our core operations generated earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") of $106.9 million and operating
income of $57.0 million. EBITDA and operating income from core operations in
fiscal 1998 were $116.4 million and $66.0 million, respectively.
Core operations EBITDA in fiscal 1999 also included pre-operating and start-
up expenses at our new Cartersville rolling facility--which began start-up
operations in March 1999--of $12.9 million, versus $1.3 million in fiscal
1998. Earnings per share from core operations, excluding start-up expenses,
were $1.19.
Net sales from core operations in fiscal 1999 were $709.9 million, versus
$836.9 million in the prior year. Shipments from core operations in fiscal
1999 were approximately 2,390,000 tons, compared with approximately 2,666,000
tons in the prior year.
As these results indicate, our core mini-mill and scrap operations are
indeed strong, despite record imports and resulting reductions in steel prices
and margins. Moreover, further reflecting the strength of our core
<PAGE>
operations, we far exceeded the consensus expectations of the financial
community in our results for the fiscal year 2000 first quarter as well,
reporting (on October 14, 1999) net income for the first fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 1999 of $5.8 million, or $0.19 per share--nearly double the
consensus "Street" estimate of $0.10 per share.
I am pleased to report that the outlook for our core business is positive.
For example, at the new Cartersville mid-section rolling mill, which began
start-up operations in March 1999, we are taking the steps necessary to expand
our merchant product offering, and to leverage Cartersville's melt capacity
throughout the organization. At Jackson, we continue to grow our higher-margin
merchant bar and niche product businesses and to improve volume levels. At
Birmingham, we are achieving higher volumes and improved inventory turns, and
are running the rolling mill near capacity with billets supplied by
Cartersville. At Seattle, we are achieving continued growth in merchant bar
sales, expanding our sales platform in Canada, and taking steps to achieve
higher utilization rates during the winter months. At Kankakee/Joliet, we are
adding volume at the Joliet mill, using billets from Jackson to improve
utilization rates.
We are continuing our steady Cartersville start-up, and have implemented an
operating strategy that includes strengthening the management team, quickly
building melt shop volumes, and having the rolling mill achieve commercial
volumes on all sections by year-end 1999. We expect Cartersville to be
profitable by the first quarter of calendar year 2000, and to significantly
enhance our competitive position as a low-cost rod billet and merchant billet
supplier offering one-stop shopping in the mid-section steel market.
We also have taken steps to further strengthen our management team by some
significant additions. Brian F. Hill joined Birmingham Steel as Chief
Operating Officer in June 1999, after fifteen years in the steel and steel-
related businesses with Cargill, Inc., including serving as Executive Vice
President of Operations at North Star Steel. Kevin E. Walsh joined the Company
in July 1998 as Executive Vice President--Chief Financial Officer, after
serving in executive financial positions at Johnson & Johnson and other
companies. They join a management team and employee base that have done an
outstanding job under very difficult conditions.
The Board and management of your Company are confident that once the
strategic restructuring is completed--which we expect will occur by May 2000--
we will be well-positioned to achieve increasingly and consistently strong
operational and financial results, continue to reduce debt, increase our
strategic and financial flexibility and, in turn, build the value of
Birmingham Steel for you.
Non-Core Operations
The Company's decision to discontinue its SBQ operations, which include its
Memphis and Cleveland facilities and the 50% stake in AIR, was attributable to
continuing financial and operational challenges that have required a major and
continuing commitment of management and financial resources and have masked
the strength and success of our core rebar, merchant and scrap businesses.
Losses from the SBQ operations have also constrained our financial flexibility
by significantly increasing the Company's debt level.
Questionable strategic and operational decisions made before 1996 led
directly to the continuing challenges experienced by the SBQ operations and
the adverse impact to shareholder value that has occurred over the past three
years.
Although the SBQ operations have made meaningful progress, we believe that
the long-term interests of the Company's shareholders will be better served by
building upon our core rebar, merchant and scrap operations. We intend to seek
a buyer for the SBQ operations whose business strategy and operational
resources are more aligned with those operations, and who is prepared to help
the SBQ operations realize their full potential. We believe that the SBQ
operations with the right strategic partner should be in a position to realize
its potential.
Financial Results
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999, the Company recorded income from
continuing operations of $3.3 million, or $0.11 per share. Excluding losses
associated with PCR and start-up expenses related to Cartersville, earnings
per share from continuing operations were $1.19.
<PAGE>
For the year, primarily reflecting losses attributable to the SBQ operations
and one-time charges related to the strategic restructuring, the Company
reported a consolidated net loss of $224.2 million, or $7.61 per share, versus
prior-year net income of $1.6 million, or $0.05 per share. The loss from
discontinued operations for the 1999 fiscal year was $227.5 million, or $7.72
per share.
# # #
These are challenging times for the American steel industry, and for this
Company. Notwithstanding those challenges, your Board of Directors and
management are dedicated to building upon the strength of our core mini-mill
and scrap operations and to aggressively implementing the strategic
restructuring. By doing so, and with the continuing dedication and loyalty of
all of our employees, we will be closer to achieving our overriding objective
of building the value of this Company for you, and thereby rewarding you for
your continuing confidence and support.
/s/ Robert A. Garvey
Robert A. Garvey
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999
OR
[_]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
From the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-9820
----------------
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Delaware 13-3213634
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S.Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 300
Birmingham, Alabama 35242-2516
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
</TABLE>
(205) 970-1200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
----------------
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on Which Registered
------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock, par value New York Stock
$0.01 per share Exchange
</TABLE>
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
NONE
----------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such report), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
As of September 30, 1999, 29,732,615 shares of Common Stock of the
registrant were outstanding. On such date the aggregate market value of shares
(based upon the closing market price of the Company's Common Stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on September 30, 1999) held by non-affiliates was
$221,856,443. For purposes of this calculation only directors and officers are
deemed to be affiliates.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of our Proxy Statement for the 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
are incorporated herein by reference in response to items 10 through 12 in
Part III of this report.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Birmingham Steel Corporation (the Company) owns and operates facilities in
the mini-mill sector of the steel industry. In addition, the Company owns
equity interests in scrap collection and processing operations. From these
facilities, which are located across the United States and Canada, the Company
produces a variety of steel products including semi-finished steel billets,
reinforcing bars and merchant products such as rounds, flats, squares, strips,
angles and channels. The Company also operates regional warehouse and steel
distribution facilities.
The following table summarizes the Company's principal production
facilities:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Location Operation Primary Products Produced
-------- --------- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Birmingham, AL Mini Mill Steel Billets, Rebar, Merchant Products
Cartersville, GA(1) Mini Mill Steel Billets, Merchant Products
Joliet, IL Rolling Mill Rebar, Merchant Products
Kankakee, IL Mini Mill Steel Billets, Rebar, Merchant Products
Jackson, MS(1) Mini Mill Steel Billets, Rebar, Merchant Products
Cleveland, OH(2) Rolling Mills SBQ Rods, Bars and Wire
Memphis, TN(2) Melt Shop SBQ Blooms and Billets
Seattle, WA Mini Mill Steel Billets, Rebar, Merchant Products
Jackson, MS Scrap Processing Scrap
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Facilities owned by Birmingham Southeast, LLC, an 85% owned consolidated
subsidiary.
(2) These facilities are designated as discontinued operations in fiscal
1999--see "Restructuring Plan."
In addition to the production facilities listed above, the Company owns 50%
equity interests in two joint venture scrap collection and processing
operations: Richmond Steel Recycling, LLC, located in Vancouver, British
Columbia, and Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC (Pacific Coast), located in
southern California. The Company also owns a 50% interest in American Iron
Reduction, LLC (AIR), which operates a direct reduced iron (DRI) production
facility in Convent, Louisiana.
Restructuring Plan
On August 18, 1999, the Company announced a strategic restructuring plan
intended to permit the Company to focus on its profitable core reinforcing
bar, merchant product and scrap businesses and to reduce its financial
leverage. As part of the restructuring plan, the Company intends to dispose of
its special bar quality (SBQ) operations, including its facilities in
Cleveland, Ohio and Memphis, Tennessee, and its 50% interest in American Iron
Reduction, LLC, (AIR) a company which supplies raw material to the Memphis
facility. The SBQ operations are a "major line of business" as defined in
Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 30. Accordingly, as explained in Note
2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the impact of the Company's
decision to dispose of the SBQ operations is reported as discontinued
operations in fiscal 1999 and in prior periods reflected in this report.
1
<PAGE>
As part of the restructuring plan announced on August 18, 1999, the Company
also announced that it would be exploring alternatives with respect to its 50%
interest in Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC (Pacific Coast), a joint venture
established in 1996 to operate in Southern California as a collector,
processor and seller of scrap. Management and the Board of Directors
subsequently determined that Pacific Coast was no longer a strategic fit for
the Company's core mini-mill operations and decided not to continue to support
its operations. In light of this decision, the Company re-evaluated its
investment in Pacific Coast, and concluded that it should be written down in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999. The resulting provision for loss of $19.3
million, which reflects a write-down of the then remaining carrying value of
the Company's investment in Pacific Coast, is reflected in "Loss from equity
investments" within continuing operations in the 1999 Consolidated Statement
of Operations.
The Company believes that the implementation of its strategic restructuring
plan will enable it to achieve greater financial flexibility while providing a
platform for future growth and success.
History
The Company was formed in 1983 and commenced operations in 1984. Upon
commencement of operations, the Company owned two mini-mills--in Birmingham,
Alabama and Kankakee, Illinois. Subsequently, the Company has followed a
strategy of growing by acquisition when market and economic conditions
warrant. The Company acquired additional mini-mills in Jackson, Mississippi
(1985) and Seattle, Washington (1986). In 1991, the Company acquired the
assets of Seattle Steel, Inc. and consolidated all of its Seattle operations
at the former Seattle Steel site. In 1993, the Company entered the SBQ market
with the acquisition of American Steel & Wire, which added the Joliet mini-
mill as well as rod and wire mill assets that are currently in use in the
Company's Cleveland facility.
In 1994, the Company acquired a Florida-based steel distributor, Port
Everglades Steel Corporation, which distributes steel products manufactured by
the Company and by third parties. In December 1996, the Company contributed
its Jackson, Mississippi mini-mill facility to Birmingham Southeast LLC
(Birmingham Southeast), a consolidated subsidiary owned 85% by Birmingham East
Coast Holdings, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and 15% by a
subsidiary of IVACO, Inc. Birmingham Southeast then purchased steel making
assets located in Cartersville, Georgia from Atlantic Steel Industries, Inc.
(Atlantic), a subsidiary of IVACO, Inc. At the time of its formation,
Birmingham Southeast entered into a tolling agreement with Atlantic pursuant
to which Atlantic converted billets produced by Birmingham Southeast into
merchant product for a tolling fee. Birmingham Southeast also entered into a
take or pay agreement to supply billets to Atlantic. These agreements expired
January 1, 1999. In March 1999, the Company commenced start-up of a new
medium-section mill to replace the rolling production that was provided under
the tolling arrangement with Atlantic.
Following its acquisition of American Steel & Wire in 1993, the Company's
management sought to build the Company's special bar quality operations using
the rod and wire mill assets acquired from American Steel as a platform. In
addition to building additional rolling mill capacity in Cleveland, the
Company constructed a melt shop in Memphis, Tennessee. The Memphis melt shop
facility was intended to provide lower cost raw materials (high grade, low
carbon billets) for the Cleveland SBQ rod, bar and wire operations. During the
development and expansion of the Cleveland and Memphis facilities, industry
overcapacity and an increase in imported SBQ products created unfavorable
pricing conditions. In August 1999, the Company announced its intention to
divest its SBQ operations in order to focus on its core mini-mill and scrap
operations.
New Projects
The Company follows a continuous program to upgrade and improve its
existing facilities, while at the same time searching for opportunities to add
productive capacity when warranted. In March 1999, the Company commenced the
start-up of its new Cartersville rolling mill. The new Cartersville rolling
mill facility is expected to expand the Company's merchant product offerings
and enable the Company to penetrate new markets.
2
<PAGE>
Operational Management
The Company's strategies for its core mini-mills are to (i) improve its
position as a low-cost producer through continued operating cost reductions;
(ii) optimize capacity utilization at each of its core mini-mill facilities;
(iii) increase production and sales of higher margin merchant products; and
(iv) complete the restructuring plan announced on August 18, 1999.
For management purposes, the Company's continuing rebar and merchant
product mini-mill operations are divided into four strategic business units
(SBUs). Each of the Company's continuing rebar/merchant product SBUs is an
"operating segment" under the criteria established in Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. However, the continuing SBUs produce
essentially the same products using essentially identical production equipment
and techniques and they sell steel products to the same classes of customers.
In addition, their distribution methods are identical and they operate under
the same regulatory environment. Furthermore, over the long-term, the
Company's continuing SBUs are expected to generate similar long-term average
gross margins. Accordingly, the Company's continuing rebar/merchant product
line of business is considered a single segment for financial reporting
purposes.
Steel Manufacturing
Steel can be produced at significantly lower costs by mini-mills than by
integrated steel operations, which typically process iron ore and other raw
materials in blast furnaces to produce steel. Integrated steel mills generally
(i) use more costly raw materials; (ii) consume more energy; (iii) consist of
older and less efficient facilities which are more labor-intensive; and (iv)
employ a larger labor force than the mini-mill industry. In general, mini-
mills service geographic markets and produce a limited line of rebar and
merchant products. The domestic mini-mill steel industry currently has excess
production capacity. This over-capacity, together with competition from
foreign producers, has resulted in competitive product pricing and cyclical
pressures on industry profit margins. In this environment, efficient
production and cost controls are critical to the viability of domestic mini-
mill steel producers.
The Company operates mini-mills (electric arc furnace melt shops and
finished product rolling mills) in Birmingham, Alabama; Kankakee, Illinois;
and Seattle, Washington. The Company also operates a rolling mill in Joliet,
Illinois, and has warehouse and distribution facilities in Fontana and
Livermore, California; Baltimore, Maryland; and Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.
Through its wholly owned subsidiary, Birmingham East Coast Holdings, the
Company owns 85% of Birmingham Southeast, a consolidated subsidiary that
operates mini-mills in Cartersville, Georgia and Jackson, Mississippi. The
Company also operates SBQ rod, bar and wire production facilities in
Cleveland, Ohio and a SBQ melt shop in Memphis, Tennessee.
Carbon steel rebar products produced by the Company are sold primarily to
independent fabricators and distributors for use in the construction industry.
Merchant products are sold to fabricators, steel service centers and original
equipment manufacturers for use in general industrial applications. SBQ rod,
bar and wire products are sold primarily to customers in the automotive,
fastener, welding, appliance and aerospace industries.
The Company's mini-mills melt ferrous scrap to produce rebar and merchant
steel products. Production begins with the melting of ferrous scrap in an
electric arc furnace. The molten steel is then funneled through a continuous
caster which produces steel billets--continuous rectangular strands of steel--
which are then cut into predetermined lengths. Billets are transferred to a
rolling mill where they are reheated, passed through a roughing mill for size
reduction, rolled into finished rebar or merchant products, and cooled.
Merchant products then pass through state-of-the-art straightening and
stacking equipment. At the end of the production process, rebar and merchant
steel products pass through automated bundling equipment to ensure uniform
packaging for shipment to customers.
3
<PAGE>
The Company's electric are furnace in Memphis, Tennessee melts high quality
scrap and direct reduced iron (DRI) to produce molten steel that is then
poured into a continuous caster to form a bloom--which is a larger size than a
billet. In a continuous process, blooms are moved from the caster directly to
stands which reduce the blooms to a billet. The bloom cast is essential to
achieving the necessary quality for SBQ products. The Company's SBQ operations
in Cleveland obtain high quality carbon and alloy semi-finished billets from
third parties and from the Memphis melt shop, which are then converted into a
variety of high quality rod, bar and wire products.
Raw Materials and Energy Costs
The principal raw material used in the Company's mini-mills is ferrous
scrap, generally derived from automobile, industrial and railroad scrap. The
market for scrap steel is highly competitive and its price volatility is
influenced by periodic shortages, freight costs, speculation by scrap brokers
and other conditions largely beyond the control of the Company. The Company
purchases its outside scrap requirements from a number of scrap merchants and
is not generally dependent on any single supplier. In fiscal 1999, scrap costs
represented approximately 45% of the Company's total manufacturing costs at
its core mini-mills.
Within the commodity product ranges dominated by the mini-mill industry,
fluctuations in scrap market conditions have an industry-wide impact on
manufacturing costs and selling prices of finished goods. During periods of
scrap price escalation, the mini-mill industry seeks to maintain profit
margins and the Company has generally been able to pass along increased raw
material costs to customers. However, temporary reductions in profit margin
spreads frequently occur because of a timing lag between the escalation of
scrap prices and the effective market acceptance of higher selling prices for
finished steel products. Following this delay in margin recovery, steel
industry profitability has historically escalated during periods of inflated
scrap market pricing. However, there can be no assurance that competitive
conditions will permit the Company to pass on scrap cost increases in the
future.
The principal raw material for the Company's discontinued SBQ rod, bar and
wire operations is high quality steel billets. Because of the metallurgical
characteristics demanded in the finished product, the Company obtains its
billets only from those suppliers whose billets can meet the required
metallurgical specifications of its customers. The Company manufactures its
high quality rod, bar and wire products using approximately 120 generic grades
of billets. In fiscal 1999, the Company produced approximately 57% of its SBQ
billets requirements at Memphis. The Memphis melt shop uses both high grade
scrap and DRI as feed stock from AIR, the Company's DRI joint venture. The
Company also obtains a portion of its Cleveland billet requirements from its
Cartersville operation and third party suppliers.
The Company consumes large amounts of electricity and natural gas. The
Company purchases electricity from regulated utilities under interruptible
service contracts because the costs of interruptible contracts are generally
lower than alternative arrangements. However, under these high volume
industrial contracts, electricity suppliers may periodically interrupt service
during peak demand periods. Although service interruptions have ordinarily
been limited to several hours and have occurred no more than ten days per
year, there can be no assurance that such interruptions will not be more
severe in the future. The Company also consumes substantial amounts of natural
gas. Since deregulation of the natural gas industry, the Company has generally
obtained natural gas through negotiated contract purchases of well-head gas,
with transportation through local pipeline distribution networks.
4
<PAGE>
Production Capacity
The table below presents management's estimated melting and rolling mill
capacity, together with actual steel melting and rolling production for fiscal
1999. The capacities presented are management's estimates and are based upon a
normal 168-hour weekly work schedule, assuming an average product mix for each
facility and include the effects of capacity limitations currently impacting
each facility. Production capacities listed below are estimated year-end
capacity levels.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual Fiscal Annual Fiscal
Melting 1999 Rolling 1999
Capacity Production Capacity Production
-------- ---------- -------- ----------
(in thousands of tons)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Continuing core mini-mills:
Birmingham............................ 500 481 550 494
Joliet................................ -- -- 280 223
Kankakee.............................. 800 729 800 503
Seattle............................... 750 544 750 526
Jackson............................... 450 282 400 251
Cartersville.......................... 1,000 349 500 152(1)
Discontinued SBQ Operations:
Cleveland............................. -- -- 1,100 157
Memphis............................... 1,000 422 -- --
----- ----- ----- -----
4,500 2,807 4,380 2,306
===== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Cartersville rolling production through January 1999 was obtained under
an outsourced tolling agreement with a third party. In March 1999, the
Company began its own rolling operations at Cartersville. Rolling
production for 1999 reflects only the initial start-up phase of rolling
operations at Cartersville.
The Company has the capability to produce both rebar and merchant products
at each of its core mini-mills. The conversion from production of rebar to
merchant products is a routine facet of operations at the Company's mini-mill
facilities and no major impediments exist which would preclude changing the
product mix to meet changes in demand.
Production Facilities--Continuing Core Mini-Mills
Birmingham, Alabama
The Birmingham, Alabama facility was the first mini-mill built in the
United States. Since acquisition of the Birmingham facility, the Company has
installed a new electric arc furnace and sequence casting system in the melt
shop, a new reheat furnace, finishing stands, cooling bed and product shear in
the rolling mill as well as a new finished goods storage area. In 1992, the
Company transferred an in-line rolling mill from its idled facility in
Norfolk, Virginia to Birmingham. In 1994, the Company installed finished goods
bundling and transfer equipment at its Birmingham facility. The Birmingham
facility produces primarily rebar and some merchant products.
Cartersville, Georgia
Birmingham Southeast acquired the Cartersville, Georgia facility in December
1996. The facility has a melt shop with a 24 foot, 140 ton Demag AC electric
arc furnace and Demag 6 strand billet caster. Cartersville produces billets
for feedstock to the Cleveland facility. In March 1999, the Company began its
own rolling operations in Cartersville, and now produces a wide range of
merchant products at this facility. The Company currently expects to complete
the start-up of the Cartersville facility in the third quarter of fiscal 2000.
5
<PAGE>
Kankakee, Illinois
The Kankakee, Illinois facility is located approximately 50 miles south of
Chicago. Since its acquisition in 1981, the Company has renovated the
operation and installed a new melt shop, continuous caster, rolling mill,
reheat furnace and in-line straightening, stacking and bundling equipment.
Kankakee enjoys a favorable geographical proximity to key Midwest markets for
merchant products. This freight cost advantage and Kankakee's state-of-the-art
equipment capabilities are competitive advantages in the Company's strategy to
expand market share of merchant products.
Joliet, Illinois
The Joliet, Illinois facility was acquired with the Company's purchase of
American Steel & Wire Corporation in November 1993. In fiscal 1996, concurrent
with the start-up of the new high quality bar mill in Cleveland (see
"Cleveland, Ohio" below), the Company transferred the operation of the Joliet
facility from the management in Cleveland, Ohio to the operational control of
the Kankakee, Illinois management group. The Company also invested
approximately $30 million to upgrade the rolling mill and enable Joliet to
produce coiled and straight length reinforcing bar, flats, rounds and squares.
The Joliet operation consists of a modernized 2-strand, 19-stand Morgan mill,
3-zone top-fired walking beam furnace, no-twist finishing and a coil and cut-
to-length line. The Joliet operation obtains its semi-finished steel billet
requirements primarily from the Company's Kankakee facility.
Jackson, Mississippi
The Company originally acquired the Jackson facility in August 1985. In
December 1996, upon formation of Birmingham Southeast, the Company contributed
the assets of its Jackson facility to the newly-formed limited liability
company. Birmingham Southeast also owns the facility in Cartersville, Georgia
which was acquired from Atlantic Steel Corporation. The Company, through its
Birmingham East Coast Holdings subsidiary, owns 85% of Birmingham Southeast.
Since acquiring the Jackson operation, the Company has renovated the
facilities and equipment. The Jackson facility includes a melt shop which was
completed in 1993 and a modern in-line rolling mill. Installation of automated
in-line straightening and stacking equipment were completed in fiscal 1994.
The Jackson facility produces primarily merchant products including rounds,
squares, flats, strip and angles. The Jackson facility also has the capability
to produce rebar.
Seattle, Washington
The Seattle, Washington facility is located adjacent to the Port of Seattle.
The Company began operating in Seattle in 1986 upon the acquisition of a local
steel company, which provided an entry to the West Coast steel markets. In
1991, the Company purchased the assets of Seattle Steel, Inc., in west
Seattle, and consolidated all of its steel operations to the west Seattle
site.
Soon after the acquisition of the west Seattle operations, the Company began
a modernization program which included the installation of a new baghouse, new
ladle turret and billet runout table. In 1993, the Company completed
construction of a new state-of-the-art in-line rolling mill which includes
automated in-line straightening, stacking and bundling equipment designed to
facilitate Seattle's expansion in merchant product production. The Seattle
operation produces rebar and a variety of merchant products, including rounds,
angles, channels, squares, flats and strip.
PESCO Facilities
In December 1994, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of
Port Everglades Steel Corporation (PESCO), a Florida-based steel distributor
which operates facilities in Florida and Texas. PESCO obtains the majority of
its steel requirements from the Company's Birmingham and Kankakee mini-mills.
6
<PAGE>
Production Facilities--Discontinued SBQ Operations
In August 1999, the Company announced its intention to divest its SBQ
operations in order to focus on its core mini-mill and scrap operations.
Memphis, Tennessee
In November 1997, the Company began start-up operations of an SBQ melt shop
in Memphis. The Memphis melt shop was designed to produce 1.0 million tons of
high quality billets per year. The facility consists of an electric arc
furnace, vacuum degassing tank, a ladle metallurgy station, a continuous bloom
caster, and a billet rolling mill. The facility also includes inspection and
conditioning equipment used to analyze billets prior to shipment. The Company
expects to incur an additional $5,000,000 to bring the continuous bloom caster
to designed operational performance by January 2000.
Cleveland, Ohio
The Company's Cleveland, Ohio facilities include a rod mill, a bar mill and
a wire mill. The rod and wire assets were acquired in 1993 when the Company
purchased American Steel & Wire Corporation (ASW).
The Cleveland facilities produce a variety of high quality steel rod, bar
and wire products. The Cleveland operation has achieved QS9000 registration,
which is a quality system requirement established by Chrysler, Ford and
General Motors and is based upon the internationally recognized ISO9000 series
of standards. The Cleveland operation also includes a facility which produces
ultra-high tensile strength specialty wire for use in the U.S. Government's
anti-tank missile guidance systems. The Cleveland plant is the only producer
of TOW missile wire.
Products
Note 15 to the 1999 Consolidated Financial Statements provides information
about net sales for each of the past three years by type of product and by
geographic area. Following is a discussion of each of the Company's principal
products and distribution methods.
Rebar Products
The Company has the capability to produce rebar at each of its continuing
core mini-mill facilities. Rebar is generally sold to fabricators and
manufacturers who cut, bend, shape and fabricate the steel to meet
engineering, architectural or end-product specifications. Rebar is used
primarily for strengthening concrete in highway construction, building
construction and other construction applications. Unlike some other
manufacturers of rebar, the Company does not engage in the rebar fabrication
business which might put the Company into direct competition with its major
rebar customers. The Company instead focuses its marketing efforts on
independent rebar fabricators and steel service centers.
Rebar is a commodity steel product, making price the primary competitive
factor. As a result, freight costs limit rebar competition from non-regional
producers, and rebar deliveries are generally concentrated within a 700 mile
radius of the mill. Except in unusual circumstances, the customer's delivery
expense is limited to freight from the nearest mini-mill and any incremental
freight charges from another source must be absorbed by the supplier. Most of
the Company's rebar sales are shipped to customers via common carrier and, to
a lesser extent, by rail.
Rebar is consumed in a wide variety of end uses, divided into roughly equal
portions between private sector applications and public works projects.
Private sector applications include commercial and industrial buildings,
construction of apartments and hotels, utility construction, agricultural uses
and various maintenance and repair applications. Public works projects include
construction of highways and streets, public buildings, water treatment
facilities and other projects.
7
<PAGE>
The following data, reported by the American Iron and Steel Institute (a
rebar fabricator trade association), depict apparent rebar consumption in the
United States from 1989 through 1998. The table also includes rebar shipments
by the Company and its approximate market share percentage for the periods
indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Rebar Company Approximate
Consumption Shipments Market
Calendar Year (in tons) (in tons) Share
------------- ----------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1989...................................... 5,213,000 972,000 18.6%
1990...................................... 5,386,000 972,000 18.0%
1991...................................... 4,779,000 945,000 19.8%
1992...................................... 4,764,000 1,060,000 22.3%
1993...................................... 5,051,000 1,181,000 23.4%
1994...................................... 5,151,000 1,185,000 23.0%
1995...................................... 5,454,000 1,108,000 20.3%
1996...................................... 6,071,000 1,288,000 21.2%
1997...................................... 6,188,000 1,432,000 23.1%
1998...................................... 7,373,000 1,363,000 18.5%
</TABLE>
The Company's rebar operations are subject to a period of moderately reduced
sales from November to February, when winter weather and the holiday season
impact the construction market demand for rebar.
Merchant Products
The Company has the capability to produce merchant products at each of its
continuing core mini-mill facilities. Merchant products consist of rounds,
squares, flats, strip, angles and channels. Merchant products are generally
sold to fabricators, steel service centers and manufacturers who cut, bend,
shape and fabricate the steel to meet engineering or end product
specifications. Merchant products are used to manufacture a wide variety of
products, including gratings, steel floor and roof joists, safety walkways,
ornamental furniture, stair railings and farm equipment.
Merchant products typically require more specialized processing and handling
than rebar, including straightening, stacking and specialized bundling.
Because of the greater variety of shapes and sizes, merchant products are
typically produced in shorter production runs, necessitating more frequent
changeovers in rolling mill equipment. Merchant products command higher prices
and generally produce higher profit margins than rebar products. The Company
has installed modern straightening, stacking and bundling equipment at its
mills to strengthen its competitiveness in merchant markets.
As with rebar, the Company generally ships merchant products to customers by
common carrier or by rail and equalizes freight costs to the nearest competing
mill.
The following data reported by the American Iron and Steel Institute depict
apparent consumption of merchant products in the United States from 1989
through 1998. The table also includes merchant product shipments by the
Company and its approximate market share percentage for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Merchant Product Company Approximate
Consumption Shipments Market
Calendar Year (in tons) (in tons) Share
------------- ---------------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1989................................. 8,398,000 272,000 3.2%
1990................................. 8,379,000 306,000 3.7%
1991................................. 7,045,000 287,000 4.1%
1992................................. 7,504,000 330,000 4.4%
1993................................. 8,445,000 395,000 4.6%
1994................................. 10,113,000 484,000 4.8%
1995................................. 10,618,000 524,000 4.9%
1996................................. 10,341,000 520,000 5.0%
1997................................. 10,534,000 925,000 8.8%
1998................................. 11,600,000 909,000 7.8%
</TABLE>
8
<PAGE>
SBQ Rod, Bar and Wire Products
In August 1999, the Company announced its intention to divest its SBQ
operations in order to focus on its core mini-mill and scrap operations. For
financial reporting purposes, the SBQ operations are being treated as
discontinued operations. The following discussion is provided for historical
reference purposes.
The Company's SBQ facilities market high-quality rod, bar and wire products
to customers in the automotive, agricultural, industrial fastener, welding,
appliance and aerospace industries. Because of the flexibility of the
Cleveland facility, the Company produces a wide variety of SBQ products,
including cold heading quality, cold finish quality, cold rolling quality,
welding quality, specialty high carbon quality, industrial quality, bearing
quality and wire products. Approximately 70% of the Company's SBQ shipments
are to customers serving the original equipment and after-market segments of
the automotive industry.
End-uses of the Company's SBQ rod and bar products include electric motor
shafts, engine bolts, lock hasps, screws, pocket wrenches, seat belt bolts,
springs, cable wire, chain bearings, tire bead and welding wire. Steel wire
produced by the Company is used by customers to produce steel wool pads, brake
pads, golf spikes and fasteners such as bolts, rivets, screws, studs and nuts.
The Company's TOW wire products are used exclusively in the defense industry
to produce guidance systems for the TOW anti-tank missile.
Because of the nature of the end-uses, the Company's SBQ products must meet
exacting metallurgical and size tolerance specifications and defect-free
surface characteristics. The Company's marketing and sales strategy is to meet
or exceed customers' requirements for high quality steel rod and wire
manufactured to close tolerances and exacting surface characteristics.
The Company's pricing strategy for SBQ products is generally market driven.
Typically, rapidly responsive market pricing prevails for most customers that
rely on market competition to determine price. The major exception to this is
in the automotive industry, where model-year pricing practices result in fixed
pricing for twelve months into the future price (generally beginning August
1). This practice provides pricing certainty to automotive industry OEM
suppliers.
Competition
Price sensitivity in markets for the Company's products is driven by
competitive factors and the cost of steel production. The geographic marketing
areas for the Company's products are similar.
Because rebar and merchant products are commodity products, the major
factors governing the sale of rebar and merchant products are manufacturing
cost, competitive pricing, inventory availability, facility location and
service. The Company competes in the rebar and merchant markets primarily with
numerous regional domestic mini-mill companies.
The Company's primary competitors in rod and bar products are divisions of
domestic and foreign integrated steel companies and domestic mini-mill
companies. The Company competes primarily in the high quality end of the rod,
bar and wire markets, differentiating itself from many of its competitors.
Although price is an important competitive factor in the Company's SBQ
business, particularly during recessionary times, the Company believes that
its sales are principally dependent upon product quality, on-time delivery and
customer service. The Company's SBQ marketing and sales activities have
generally emphasized its ability to meet or exceed customers' requirements for
high quality steel rod, bar and wire manufactured to close tolerances and
exacting surface and internal characteristics. These markets constitute a
relatively small percentage of total domestic steel consumption, and therefore
some domestic integrated mills have exited this business or given it a low
priority. Additionally, these mini-mills are generally unable to produce steel
of sufficient quality and metallurgical characteristics to produce rod, bar
and wire comparable in quality to that manufactured by the Company.
9
<PAGE>
Foreign Competition
In recent years, a declining U.S. dollar and increased efficiency in the
U.S. steel industry have improved the competitive position of U.S. steel
producers. Foreign steel is a competitive factor on a sporadic basis. Federal
legislation currently prohibits the use of foreign steel in federally funded
highway construction.
Employees
Production Facilities
At June 30, 1999, the Company employed 2,127 people at its production
facilities. The Company estimates that approximately 29% of its current
employee compensation in operations is earned on an incentive basis linked to
production. The percentage of incentive pay varies from mill to mill based
upon operating efficiencies. During fiscal 1999, hourly employee costs at
these facilities were approximately $29 per hour, including overtime and
fringe benefits, which was competitive with other mini-mills. Approximately 95
production and maintenance employees at the Joliet facility have been
represented by United Steelworkers of America since 1986, and are parties to a
collective bargaining contract which expires in June 2000. During fiscal 1999,
hourly employee costs at this facility were approximately $27 per hour,
including overtime and fringe benefits. The Company's other facilities are not
unionized. The Company has never experienced a strike or other work stoppage
at its steel mills and management believes that employee relations remain
good.
Sales and Administrative Personnel
At June 30, 1999, the Company employed 256 sales and administrative
personnel, of which 109 were employed at the Company's corporate office
headquarters located in Birmingham, Alabama and 42 were employed in the
discontinued SBQ business headquarters in Cleveland, Ohio.
Environmental and Regulatory Matters
The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations concerning, among other matters, waste water effluent, air
emissions and furnace dust disposal. As these regulations increase in
complexity and scope, environmental considerations play an increasingly
important role in planning, daily operations and expenses.
The Company operates engineering/environmental services departments and has
environmental coordinators at its facilities to maintain compliance with
applicable laws and regulations. These personnel are responsible for the daily
management of environmental matters. The Company believes it is currently in
compliance with all known material and applicable environmental regulations.
Changes in federal or state regulations or a discovery of unknown conditions
could require additional substantial expenditures by the Company.
The Company's mini-mills are classified as hazardous waste generators
because they produce and collect certain types of dust containing lead and
cadmium. The Company currently collects and disposes of such wastes at
approved landfill sites or recycling sites through contracts with approved
waste disposal and recycling firms.
The Cleveland facilities were acquired pursuant to an Asset Sales Agreement
dated May 19, 1986 (the "Agreement"), by and between ASW and USX Corporation
(formerly United States Steel Corporation) ("USX"). Pursuant to the Agreement,
ASW is indemnified by USX for claims, if any, which may be asserted against
ASW under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended,
42 U.S.C. Subsection 6901, et seq., and the Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sub-
section 9601, et. seq., or which may be asserted under similar federal or
state statutes or regulations, which arise out of USX's actions on or prior to
June 30, 1986, the date on which ASW acquired these facilities. To date, no
such claims have been identified or asserted against ASW.
10
<PAGE>
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, information regarding the
executive officers of the Company called for by Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K
is presented below.
The following table sets forth the name of each executive officer of the
Company, the offices they hold, and their ages as of October 1, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Office Held
---- --- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Robert A. Garvey............... 61 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Brian F. Hill.................. 53 Chief Operating Officer
Kevin E. Walsh................. 55 Executive Vice President-Chief Financial Officer
William R. Lucas............... 44 Managing Director Southern Region
Jack R. Wheeler................ 63 Managing Director Northern Region
</TABLE>
Robert A. Garvey was elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer in January 1996. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Garvey served as
President of North Star Steel Company from 1984 to 1996.
Brian F. Hill joined the Company in June 1999 and serves as Chief Operating
Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hill spent thirty-one years with
Cargill, Inc., of which fifteen years were spent in its steel and steel-
related businesses, including serving as Executive Vice President of
Operations at North Star Steel.
Kevin E. Walsh joined the Company in July 1998 and serves as Executive Vice
President-Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Walsh has
served in executive financial positions, most recently as Chief Financial
Officer for Remington Arms Company.
William R. Lucas, Jr. joined the Company in July 1995 and serves as Managing
Director Southern Region. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lucas was a
founding partner of the Birmingham, Alabama based law firm Lightfoot,
Franklin, White & Lucas, where he served as managing partner from 1990 to
1995.
Jack R. Wheeler joined the Company in November 1992 and serves as Director
Northern Region. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wheeler served as Vice
President and Works Manager at SMI Steel Inc. from 1986 to 1992.
Risk Factors
A description of "Risk Factors that May Affect Future Operating Results"
relating to the Company is set forth on Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated
herein by reference.
11
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table lists the Company's real property and production
facilities. Management believes that these facilities are adequate to meet the
Company's current and future commitments.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Building
Square Owned or
Location Acreage Footage Leased
-------- ------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Corporate Headquarters:
Birmingham, Alabama............................. -- 38,396 Leased
Operating Facilities:
Continuing Operations:
Birmingham, Alabama............................ 26 260,900 Owned(1)
Kankakee, Illinois............................. 222 400,000 Owned
Seattle, Washington............................ 69 736,000 Owned
Jackson, Mississippi........................... 99 323,000 Owned(1)
Cartersville, Georgia.......................... 283 367,000 Owned
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida........................ -- 29,500 Leased
Discontinued Operations:
Cleveland, Ohio................................. 216 2,041,600 Owned
Memphis, Tennessee.............................. 500 184,800 Owned
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Portions of equipment that were financed by Industrial Revenue bonds and
the land upon which such equipment is located are leased pursuant to the
terms of such bonds.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its
operations in the normal course of business. Most of the existing known claims
against the Company are covered by insurance, subject to the payment of
deductible amounts by the Company. Management believes that any uninsured or
unindemnified liability resulting from existing litigation will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business or financial position.
However, there can be no assurance that insurance, including product liability
insurance, will be available in the future at reasonable rates.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Not Applicable
12
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"),
is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BIR.
The table below sets forth for the two fiscal years ended June 30, 1999 and
1998, the high and low prices of the Company's Common Stock based upon the
high and low sales prices of the Common Stock as reported on the New York
Stock Exchange Composite Tape.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
High Low
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
First Quarter................................................ $12.75 $ 6.44
Second Quarter............................................... 7.94 3.50
Third Quarter................................................ 5.13 3.88
Fourth Quarter............................................... 7.13 3.94
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1998
First Quarter................................................ $20.56 $15.38
Second Quarter............................................... 18.25 14.63
Third Quarter................................................ 18.00 15.19
Fourth Quarter............................................... 17.38 11.19
</TABLE>
The last sale price of the Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange on September 30, 1999 was $7.625. As of September 30, 1999, there
were 1,499 holders of record of the Common Stock. The Company's registrar and
transfer agent is First Union National Bank of North Carolina.
The ability of the Company to pay dividends in the future will be dependent
upon general business conditions, earnings, capital requirements, funds
legally available for such dividends, contractual provisions of debt
agreements and other relevant factors (see "Selected Consolidated Financial
Data" for information concerning dividends paid by the Company during the past
five fiscal years).
Under the terms of the Company's amended debt agreements (See Note 7 to
Consolidated Financial Statements), dividends and other "restricted payments,"
as defined in the agreements, are limited to the lesser of $750,000 per
quarter or 50% of quarterly income from continuing operations. The Company
does not expect to change its present rate of quarterly dividend payments
($.025 per share) in the near term.
13
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
-----------------------------------------------------
1999 1998(1) 1997(1) 1996(1) 1995(1)
--------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
(In thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations
Data:
Net sales................ $ 709,876 $ 836,875 $ 667,716 $564,254 $574,624
Cost of sales:
Other than depreciation
and amortization....... 568,688 689,347 555,684 488,731 457,473
Depreciation and
amortization........... 40,227 37,954 32,739 29,202 25,355
--------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
Gross profit............ 100,961 109,574 79,293 46,321 91,796
Pre-operating/start-up
costs................... 12,854 1,305 6,730 13,630 1,337
Selling, general and
administrative expense.. 36,625 44,214 33,492 28,862 30,108
Interest expense......... 24,248 17,261 11,906 9,481 6,890
--------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
27,234 46,794 27,165 (5,652) 53,461
Other income, net........ 9,930 12,794 4,704 3,723 8,067
Loss from equity
investments............. (24,563) (18,326) (1,566) -- --
Minority interest in loss
of subsidiary........... 5,497 1,643 2,347 -- --
--------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
before income taxes..... 18,098 42,905 32,650 (1,929) 61,528
Provision for (benefit
from) income taxes...... 14,814 14,960 12,863 (670) 24,610
--------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from
continuing operations... 3,284 27,945 19,787 (1,259) 36,918
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations,
net of tax.............. (227,520) (26,316) (5,370) (918) 13,731
--------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)........ $(224,236) $ 1,629 $ 14,417 $ (2,177) $ 50,649
========= ========== ========== ======== ========
Basic and diluted per
share amounts:
Income (loss) from
continuing operations.. $ 0.11 $ 0.94 $ 0.68 $ (0.04) $ 1.27
Income (loss) on
discontinued
operations............. (7.72) (0.89) (0.18) (0.04) .47
--------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)....... $ (7.61) $ 0.05 $ 0.50 $ (0.08) $ 1.74
========= ========== ========== ======== ========
Dividends declared per
share................... $ 0.175 $ 0.40 $ 0.40 $ 0.40 $ 0.40
========= ========== ========== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
June 30,
-----------------------------------------------------
1999 1998(1) 1997(1) 1996(1) 1995(1)
--------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital.......... $ 110,434 $ 237,673 $ 228,881 $211,596 $206,901
Total assets............. 877,466 1,158,015 1,124,717 865,501 722,077
Long-term debt less
current portion......... 469,135 516,439 485,056 292,500 142,500
Stockholders' equity..... 230,731 460,607 471,548 448,192 459,719
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) The selected consolidated financial data for fiscal 1995 through 1998 has
been restated, as required by generally accepted accounting principles, to
reflect the Company's special bar quality (SBQ) business as discontinued
operations. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
14
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Disposal of SBQ Operations
On August 18, 1999, the Company announced a strategic restructuring plan
intended to permit the Company to focus on its core rebar, merchant product and
scrap businesses by disposing of its special bar quality (SBQ) operations. The
Company's SBQ operations include rod, bar and wire rolling mills in Cleveland,
Ohio, a high quality melt shop in Memphis, Tennessee, and a 50% interest in
American Iron Reduction LLC (AIR), a joint venture that supplies raw material
to the Memphis facility. The Company's decision to discontinue its SBQ
operations was attributable to continuing financial and operational challenges
which have required a major and continuing commitment of management and
financial resources and have constrained the Company's financial flexibility
while significantly increasing its debt. The Company expects to sell the SBQ
operations by May 2000.
As a result of this decision, the Company recorded a $173.2 million estimated
loss ($5.87 per share) on the sale of the SBQ operations, which included a
$56.5 million provision (pre-tax) for estimated losses during the expected
disposal period. These charges are combined with the fiscal 1999 operating
losses of the SBQ division ($54.3 million, net of income tax benefits) and
presented as discontinued operations in the fiscal 1999 financial statements.
On a combined basis, losses from the SBQ operations amounted to $227.5 million
($7.72 per share), $26.3 million ($.89 per share) and $5.4 million ($.18 per
share) in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The proceeds expected to be
realized on the sale of the SBQ operations are based on management's estimates
of the most likely outcome, considering, among other things, informal
appraisals from the Company's investment bankers and the Company's knowledge of
valuations for steel production assets. The expected operating losses during
the disposal period are based upon the Company's business plan for the SBQ
operations. However, the actual amounts ultimately realized on sale and losses
incurred during the expected disposal period could differ materially from the
amounts assumed in arriving at the losses reflected in the 1999 financial
statements. Among other things, the reserve for operating losses during the
expected disposal period assumes that the Company will continue to operate the
SBQ facilities through the disposal date and that during that period,
production and shipment volumes will improve marginally over fiscal 1999
levels. If the Company decides to curtail or cease operations before the
facilities are sold, actual losses could be materially different from those
provided in the financial statements. In addition, while management believes
that the estimated proceeds from the sale of the SBQ operations is a reasonable
estimate of the enterprise value, there can be no assurance that such amounts
will be realized. To the extent that actual proceeds or operating losses during
the expected disposal period differ from the estimates that are reflected in
the 1999 financial statements, the variance will be reported in discontinued
operations in future periods.
Management expects to use the proceeds from the sale to: (a) settle its
obligations under a lease agreement for equipment at the Memphis facility
(approximately $74 million); (b) pay estimated transaction expenses
($8 million); and (c) retire industrial revenue bonds and other debt
specifically associated with the SBQ assets ($42.2 million). The balance of the
proceeds will be used to pay down a portion of the Company's other long-term
debt. (See Notes 2 and 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)
Proxy Contest
On August 13, 1999 the Company announced it had been notified by a dissident
stockholder group that the group intended to propose an alternate slate of nine
directors at the Company's 1999 annual meeting of stockholders. The intentions
of that group are more fully described in the group's Schedule 13D and the
preliminary proxy materials filed by the Company and separately by the
dissident stockholder group. Management estimates that this proxy contest could
result in expenses of approximately $1.5 million to be incurred in the first
and second quarters of fiscal 2000. In addition, the Company has entered into
agreements with its financial advisors and fees payable to such financial
advisors, the amount of which is dependent on the outcome of the proxy contest,
could aggregate an additional, approximately $1.5 to $2.0 million.
15
<PAGE>
Long-Term Debt Amendments
On October 12, 1999 the Company amended its revolving line of credit and
Senior Note agreements to provide for the continuation of the facilities for
their remaining terms. Refer to Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for information about the terms and provisions of the amendments.
Information is also provided under the caption "Liquidity and Capital
Resources--Financing Activities" below.
GENERAL
Income from continuing operations for 1999 was $3.3 million, or $0.11 per
share, down from $27.9 million, or $.94 per share for 1998. The following
table sets forth, for the years indicated, selected items in the consolidated
statements of operations as a percentage of net sales.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
----------------------
1999 1998 1997
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales............................................... 100% 100% 100%
Cost of sales:
Other than depreciation and amortization............... 80.1 82.4 83.2
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 5.7 4.5 4.9
------ ------ ------
Gross margin............................................ 14.2 13.1 11.9
Pre-operating/start-up costs............................ 1.8 0.1 1.0
Selling, general and administrative expense............. 5.1 5.3 5.0
Interest expense........................................ 3.4 2.0 1.8
Other income, net....................................... (1.4) (1.4) (0.7)
Loss from equity investments............................ 3.5 2.2 0.2
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary................. (0.8) (0.2) (0.4)
Provision for income taxes.............................. 2.1 1.8 1.9
------ ------ ------
Income from continuing operations....................... 0.5% 3.3% 3.1%
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Results From Continuing Operations
The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, trade
shipments, product mix percentages and average selling prices per ton for the
Company's continuing rebar, merchant and scrap operations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
Tons % of Avg. Tons % of Avg. Tons % of Avg.
Shipped Total Selling Shipped Total Selling Shipped Total Selling
(000's) Sales Price (000's) Sales Price (000's) Sales Price
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------- ----- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Rebar................... 1,354 56.7% $275 1,432 53.7% $302 1,298 59.7% $300
Merchants............... 885 37.0% $323 925 34.7% $344 698 32.1% $339
Other................... 151 6.3% $261 309 11.6% $265 177 8.2% $264
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total.................. 2,390 100.0% 2,666 100.0% 2,173 100.0%
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
Net Sales
In fiscal 1999, net sales from continuing operations decreased 15.2% to
$709.9 million from $836.9 million in fiscal 1998. The decrease resulted from
both a decline in shipment volumes of 10.4% as well as reductions in average
selling prices for rebar and merchant products. The declines in shipments and
selling prices are attributable primarily to unprecedented levels of steel
imports during fiscal 1999 and downward pressure on pricing attributable to
lower scrap costs that prevailed throughout the year. The Company's average
selling price for rebar decreased $27 per ton in 1999 versus 1998 while the
average selling price for merchant products decreased $21 per ton in 1999
versus 1998.
16
<PAGE>
Although average selling prices were lower in fiscal 1999 as compared to
fiscal 1998, the Company announced price increases in rebar ($20 per ton) and
merchant products ($15 per ton) effective June 1, 1999. While the market
appears receptive to price increases, imports continue to impact pricing, and
therefore the full impact of the price increases may not be realized
immediately.
In fiscal 1998, net sales from continuing operations increased 25.3% from
fiscal 1997, reflecting a 22.7% increase in steel shipments and increased
selling prices, particularly for higher margin merchant products.
Cost of Sales
As a percent of net sales, cost of sales (other than depreciation and
amortization) declined to 80.1% in fiscal 1999, compared to 82.4% in 1998. The
decline resulted primarily from lower scrap raw materials costs offset by a
slight increase in conversion costs. At the Company's continuing mini-mill
facilities, the cost to convert scrap to finished steel products increased $5
per ton in fiscal 1999 to reach $128 per ton as compared to $123 per ton in
fiscal 1998. Average scrap raw material costs decreased $31 per ton fiscal
1999, averaging $102 per ton versus $133 per ton in fiscal 1998.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 6% in fiscal 1999 to $40.2
million as compared to $38 million in fiscal 1998. The increase is primarily
attributable to the new continuous caster and medium section rolling mill at
the Company's Cartersville, Georgia facility, which began start-up operations
in March 1999.
Cost of sales (other than depreciation and amortization), as a percent of net
sales, decreased slightly to 82.4% in fiscal 1998 from 83.2% in fiscal 1997.
The improvement primarily resulted from increased volumes and lower conversion
costs. The cost per ton to convert scrap to finished steel products decreased
to $123 per ton in fiscal 1998 compared with $126 per ton in fiscal 1997. Scrap
raw material costs remained steady throughout the year and averaged $133 per
ton in fiscal 1998 and 1997.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 16% in fiscal 1998 compared
with fiscal 1997. The increase was primarily due to the recognition of a full
year of depreciation on the Cartersville, Georgia facility which was acquired
during fiscal 1997 (See Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements.)
Pre-operating/Start-up Costs
Pre-operating/start-up costs charged to continuing operations amounted to
$12.9 million in fiscal 1999 compared with $1.3 million in fiscal 1998. Both
the current and prior year charges related primarily to pre-operating and
excess costs incurred during the construction and start-up phases of the new
continuous caster and medium section rolling mill at the Company's
Cartersville, Georgia facility.
The Company expects to incur additional start-up expenses related to the
Cartersville caster and rolling mill through the third quarter of fiscal 2000.
Fiscal 1997 pre-operating and start-up costs related to the rolling mill
expansion project at the Company's Joliet, Illinois facility, which began
operations in the third quarter of fiscal 1997, and the modernization of the
melt shop at the Company's Cartersville, Georgia facility.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A")
SG&A expenses applicable to continuing operations were $36.6 million in
fiscal 1999, a decrease of 17.2% from $44.2 million in fiscal 1998. Beginning
July 1, 1998, the Company reorganized its executive management, sales and
administration functions to more closely align the organization with the
specific needs of each respective business unit. As part of the realignment,
management, sales and administration personnel were assigned to specific
business units and the costs associated with those personnel became direct
expenses of their respective business units. As a result of this change, SG&A
expenses associated with continuing operations decreased from the prior year,
with a corresponding increase in expenses associated with discontinued
operations. Aggregate SG&A expenses, including those applicable to both
continuing and discontinued operations, decreased by approximately $2 million,
reflecting elimination of the non-recurring information technology charge in
1998 described below.
17
<PAGE>
SG&A expenses were $44.2 million in fiscal 1998, an increase of 32% from
$33.5 million in fiscal 1997. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to
increased costs associated with supporting higher sales and additional
personnel and expenses related to the Cartersville facility and the non-
recurring IT costs described above. Fiscal 1998 SG&A expenses also include
approximately $2.0 million in non-recurring information technology costs
related to a decision to change software vendors for a major system upgrade.
Interest Expense
Interest expense applicable to continuing operations increased to $24.2
million in fiscal 1999 compared with $17.3 million in fiscal 1998. The increase
in interest expense was primarily due to increased borrowings on the Company's
revolving credit line during the year. Depressed selling prices and lower
shipment volumes in the Company's SBQ operations reduced the Company's
operating cash flows during the year. These factors, along with capital
spending to complete the Company's capital projects at Cartersville and other
facilities contributed to increased borrowings throughout fiscal 1999. The
Company also amended its debt agreements during the second quarter of fiscal
1999 which, along with overall increases in market rates, led to an increase in
the Company's average borrowing rate. The Company's average long-term borrowing
rate was 6.79% in fiscal 1999 versus 6.64% in fiscal 1998. In fiscal 1999, the
impact of the increase in total interest costs was offset, in part, by
increased capitalized interest--principally associated with capital spending at
Cartersville. The Company is nearing completion of its capital spending
programs and does not expect significant levels of capitalized interest to
continue during the next fiscal year. The Company expects to experience an
increase in interest expense in fiscal 2000 as a result of amending its long-
term debt agreements--see "Liquidity and Capital Resources--Financing
Activities."
Interest expense increased to $17.3 million in fiscal 1998 compared with
$11.9 million in fiscal 1997. The increase in interest expense was primarily
due to increased borrowings on the Company's revolving credit line during the
year which were required to fund the Company's capital spending program.
Income Tax
The effective tax rate applicable to continuing operations in fiscal 1999 was
81.9% as compared to 34.9% in fiscal 1998 and 39.4% in fiscal 1997. The 1999
effective tax rate was adversely impacted by the establishment of a $8 million
valuation allowance, principally related to capital loss carryforwards
associated with the $19.3 million write-down of the Company's investment in
Pacific Coast (See Note 3 to Consolidated Financial Statements). Management
believes it is more likely than not that the capital loss carryforwards will
not be realized in future tax returns to reduce taxes payable because those
carryforwards may only be deducted to the extent of future capital gains.
Therefore, a valuation allowance was provided in the 1999 tax provision to
reduce the carrying value of the related deferred tax asset.
The Company's consolidated federal net operating loss for fiscal 1999 was
approximately $60 million which was substantially a result of discontinued
operations. Of this amount, approximately $17 million will be carried back to
reduce income taxes payable for prior periods. Primarily as a result of the net
operating loss carryback, the Company expects to receive a tax refund of
approximately $14 million, during fiscal 2000. The remaining $43 million will
be carried forward and may be used to reduce taxes due in future periods for up
to 20 years. Management believes that the Company will generate sufficient
taxable income from continuing operations in future periods to utilize the tax
benefit of the net operating losses prior to their expiration. Other than the
elimination of non-recurring losses from equity investments and start-up costs
at the Company's Cartersville facility, both of which are expected to be
achieved in fiscal 2000, no significant improvements in operating results of
continuing operations are believed to be necessary in order to realize the tax
benefit of the net operating loss carryforwards. However, realization of such
benefits is somewhat dependent upon the Company's ability to complete the
disposition of the SBQ business. If the SBQ business is not sold in the near
term and its operating losses continue at the levels experienced in recent
years, the Company could be required to provide additional valuation allowances
in the future.
In addition, the Company has state net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $73 million, the majority of which will expire in 15 years. The
Company has provided a valuation allowance of $9.3 million in discontinued
operations for state net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards which
will most likely expire
18
<PAGE>
before being utilized. These loss carryforwards reside in states where the
Company's only significant operations are SBQ operations, which are to be
discontinued in fiscal 2000. Therefore, it is unlikely that the Company could
generate sufficient taxable income allocable to those states in the future to
realize the benefit of those loss carryforwards.
Results from Discontinued Operations
Net Sales
Net sales from discontinued operations in fiscal 1999 were $270.4 million, a
decrease of 9.6% from $299.1 million reported in fiscal 1998. The decrease was
primarily the result of decreased average selling prices, shipment volumes,
lower selling prices across product lines and an unfavorable shift in product
mix. In a concerted effort to reduce SBQ inventories during fiscal 1999, the
Company increased production and shipments of lower priced industrial quality
rod and bar products during fiscal 1999. The Company's average selling price
for all special bar quality (SBQ) products was $420 per ton in fiscal 1999,
compared with $451 per ton in fiscal 1998. In fiscal 1999, the SBQ division
shipped 654,000 tons of high quality and industrial quality rod, bar and wire
as compared to 662,000 tons in fiscal 1998.
Net sales in fiscal 1998 decreased 3.9% from $311.2 million in fiscal 1997.
Substantially all of the decrease in 1998 net sales was attributable to
declining selling prices. The average selling price for SBQ products was $451
per ton in fiscal 1998, down $13 per ton from $464 per ton in fiscal 1997. In
fiscal 1998, the SBQ operations shipped 662,000 tons of SBQ products compared
to 663,000 tons in fiscal 1997.
Cost of Sales
During fiscal 1999, the market price of SBQ product declined precipitously
during the first half of the year. As a result of the Company's efforts to
decrease its investment in inventory, total SBQ inventories declined by $39.6
million during the year. The liquidation of beginning inventories, which were
carried at lower of FIFO cost or market at the beginning of the year
significantly impacted SBQ margins in fiscal 1999. As a percent of net sales,
cost of sales increased to 108.2% in fiscal 1999 from 97.4% in the prior year.
The increase in cost of sales as a percent of net sales was primarily was due
to the decrease in average selling prices and a slight increase in conversion
costs. Conversion cost at the Company's SBQ rolling mill averaged $71 per ton
in fiscal 1999 compared with $68 per ton in fiscal 1998. Average billet cost
per ton increased to $364 in fiscal 1999, up $13 from $351 in fiscal 1998.
Conversion cost at the Company's SBQ facility averaged $68 per ton in fiscal
1998 compared with $69 per ton in fiscal 1997. Average billet cost per ton
declined to $351 in fiscal 1998, down $8 from $359 in fiscal 1997.
Pre-operating/Start-up Costs
Pre-operating/start-up costs from discontinued operations were $37.9 million
in fiscal 1999 compared with $32.9 million for fiscal 1998 and $3.9 million in
1997. Except for approximately $1.5 million in 1997, these costs were incurred
to start-up the Company's Memphis, Tennessee melt shop, which began start-up
operations in November 1997. In March 1999, the Memphis melt shop achieved a
production run rate of 75% of capacity, which represents the operating level
management believes is necessary to sustain break-even financial results for
the Memphis operation. However, the facility was unable to sustain this run
rate during the fourth quarter as a result of equipment problems and power
curtailments. The Company has initiated a program to correct the equipment
problems that are currently preventing the Memphis facility from achieving its
production goals. The program will require capital expenditures of
approximately $5 million, and should enable the Memphis facility to sustain a
production level of at least 75% of capacity by January 2000.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A")
SG&A expenses were $9.5 million in fiscal 1999, an increase of 114.4% from
$4.4 million in fiscal 1998. The increase in SG&A is primarily due to
additional personnel and other expenses related to the additional personnel and
expenses at Memphis and the change as described above in recording of sales
salaries, benefits, and expenses directly to the divisions instead of the
corporate overhead allocation.
19
<PAGE>
SG&A increased 40.2% in fiscal 1998 to $4.4 million from $3.2 million
reported in fiscal 1997. The increase is due to additional personnel and other
expenses related to the Memphis facility that started production in November
1997.
Other Income
In fiscal 1999, operating results of the SBQ operations included a gain of
$2.2 million from the sale of real estate in Cleveland, Ohio. The gain was
offset by a one time charge of $2.1 million to terminate a long-term raw
materials purchase commitment with a third party supplier.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations was $122
million in fiscal 1999, compared with $86.4 million in fiscal 1998. Although
the Company's continuing operations experienced a slight improvement in gross
margin during fiscal 1999, cash provided by operating activities increased
principally because of significant improvements in managing accounts
receivable and inventory levels. Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable
remained relatively stable in 1998 and 1999. In an effort to reduce borrowings
under the Company's revolving credit facility, the Company implemented
inventory reduction programs at each of its core mini-mills which were
successful in reducing inventories by $41.9 million during fiscal 1999.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used in investing activities of continuing operations were
$48.8 million in fiscal 1999, compared with $59 million in the prior year.
Expenditures related to capital projects increased to $121.8 million in fiscal
1999, versus $66.6 million in 1998, principally related to the completion of
the mid-section mill and caster projects at Cartersville. The increased
capital expenditures were offset in part from the proceeds of two sale-
leaseback transactions involving equipment at Cartersville. The first
involving equipment with a carrying value of $7.8 million, was completed in
December 1998, while the second, involving equipment with a value of $67.3
million, was completed in June 1999. The Company expects capital expenditures
will decrease substantially in fiscal 2000 to a normalized level of $20 to $30
million because the major capital improvement program at Cartersville is
substantially complete. In fiscal 1998, cash used in investing activities from
continuing operations included $30 million in proceeds from the sale of
several idled facilities, property, plant and equipment and a 50% interest in
Richmond Steel Recycling Limited. Fiscal 1998 cash used in investing
activities also reflected a $15 million investment in Laclede Steel Company,
which was written off in fiscal 1998.
In fiscal 1997, the Company made a $9.25 million investment in Pacific
Coast, a 50% owned joint venture established to operate in southern California
as a collector, processor and seller of scrap. On December 27, 1996, Pacific
Coast purchased scrap processing assets from the estate of Hiuka America
Corporation and its affiliates with an annual capacity of approximately
600,000 tons. Through June 30, 1999 the Company has invested approximately
$29.4 million in Pacific Coast, including loans of approximately $20 million.
During fiscal 1999, the Company continually evaluated its investment in
Pacific Coast in the context of current conditions in the Asian scrap export
market as well as the ability of Pacific Coast to competitively participate in
the domestic scrap market. After carefully reviewing its options, management
and the Board of Directors determined that Pacific Coast was no longer a
strategic fit for the Company's core mini-mill operations and decided not to
continue its support of the operations. The Company then re-evaluated the
carrying amount of its investment in light of the changed circumstances and
concluded that it should be written down in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999.
The resulting $19.3 million provision for loss ($0.65 per share after tax) is
reflected in "Loss from equity investments" within continuing operations in
the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Pacific Coast is utilizing a leased facility at the Port of Long Beach to
export scrap. In connection with this venture, the Company has guaranteed 50%
of Pacific Coast's obligations under an operating lease that requires Pacific
Coast to pay annual rent of approximately $3.8 million through November 2019
(See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
20
<PAGE>
On November 15, 1996, the Company entered into a Contribution Agreement with
Atlantic Steel Industries, Inc. (Atlantic) and IVACO, Inc., the parent of
Atlantic, pursuant to which the Company and Atlantic formed Birmingham
Southeast, LLC (Birmingham Southeast), a limited liability company owned 85%
by Birmingham East Coast Holdings, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,
and 15% by a subsidiary of IVACO, Inc. On December 2, 1996, pursuant to the
Contribution Agreement, the Company contributed the assets of its Jackson,
Mississippi facility to Birmingham Southeast and Birmingham Southeast
purchased the assets of Atlantic located in Cartersville, Georgia for $43.3
million in cash and assumed approximately $44.3 million in liabilities (See
Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
In fiscal 1999, cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations
was $20.2 million as compared to $18.7 million in fiscal 1998.
In fiscal 1997, the Company and Georgetown Industries, Inc. (GII), formed
AIR, located in Convent, Louisiana. The joint venture produces direct reduced
iron (DRI), which is used as a substitute for high grade. Construction of the
DRI facility was funded by a $177 million non-recourse project financing
arrangement, proceeds from an $8 million industrial revenue bond and initial
equity investments of $20 million by the venture partners in fiscal 1998. The
Company made additional equity investments of $3.75 million during fiscal 1999
and is contingently obligated to make up to $3.75 million in additional
contributions.
The Company invested approximately $18.9 million in capital projects related
to discontinued operations during fiscal 1999. The Company anticipates
additional capital expenditures of approximately $5 million at Memphis prior
to the disposal of the SBQ operations. Beyond these investments at Memphis, no
further investments in the SBQ operations are currently planned.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations was $55.7
million in fiscal 1999, compared with cash provided by financing activities of
continuing operations of $29 million in fiscal 1998. The Company's strategy of
depleting inventory levels, coupled with the completion of the sale/leaseback
transactions at Cartersville, enabled the Company to reduce outstanding
borrowings under its Revolving Credit Agreement by $37.3 million and repay $10
million in short-term notes payable during fiscal 1999. On October 12, 1999,
the Company reduced its quarterly cash dividend from $0.10 per share to $0.025
per share in response to changing economic conditions in the global steel
industry and to conserve cash.
On January 23, 1997, the Company issued 1,000,000 additional shares of
common stock from treasury in a public offering registered with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The proceeds of $19.2 million from the offering were
used to partially fund the acquisition of the assets of Atlantic Steel
Industries, Inc. (See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
In fiscal 1997 the Company completed a $26 million, 30 year tax-free bond
financing at Memphis, to finance a portion of the Memphis expansion project.
At June 30, 1999, the Company was not in compliance with the interest
coverage covenants pertaining its $150 million and $130 million Senior Notes,
its $300 million Revolving Credit Agreement and letter of credit agreements
underlying its capital lease and industrial revenue bond obligations. On
October 12, 1999, the Company and its lenders executed amendments to the debt
and letter of credit agreements. The amendments waived the pre-existing
noncompliances, and modified the financial and other covenants to provide the
Company with additional flexibility to meet its operating plan without
violating the covenants in the future. The amendments also provide for
increased interest rates payable to the banks and Senior Noteholders, security
interests in substantially all of the Company's assets being granted to the
lenders, and certain approval requirements with respect to the sale of the SBQ
division. The Company also agreed to pay modifications fees of approximately
$1.1 million. As a result of the increased interest rates applicable to the
amended debt facilities, the expected debt levels for fiscal 2000 and the
expected reduction in capitalized interest, the Company expects that total
interest expense (continuing operations and discontinued operations) will
increase $8 to $9 million over the fiscal 1999 level of $40.2 million. The
Company expects to reflect an extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt of
approximately $1.3 million, or $0.04 per share, related to the debt
restructuring in its financial results for the second quarter.
21
<PAGE>
In addition, in the event that the Company is unable to sell the SBQ division
by January 31, 2001, the Company will incur a 100 basis point increase in the
interest rates under the Revolving Credit Agreement and each of the Senior
Notes, which would be reduced to 50 basis points upon a subsequent sale of the
SBQ division.
Based upon the current level of the Company's operations and current industry
conditions, the Company anticipates that it will have sufficient resources to
make all required interest and principal payments under the credit agreement
and Senior Notes through December 15, 2001. However, the Company is required to
make significant principal repayments on December 15, 2001 and, accordingly,
may be required to refinance its obligations under the Revolving Credit
Agreement and Senior Notes on or prior to such date. There can be no assurance
that any such refinancing would be possible at such time, or, if possible, that
acceptable terms could be obtained, particularly in view of the Company's high
level of debt, the restrictive covenants under the financing agreements, the
Company's obligations to AIR (discussed below) and the fact that substantially
all of the Company's assets have been pledged to the banks and Senior
Noteholders.
Under the Company's debt agreements, a change in a majority of the Company's
Board of Directors including as a result of a contested proxy solicitation,
such as is being waged by a dissident stockholder group, will give rise, among
other things, to the acceleration of the Company's debt obligations and may, as
a result, have a material adverse effect on the Company, its financial
condition and its operations.
In the event of such a change in control, the Company would be required to
make an offer to prepay its Senior Notes which, if accepted, would obligate the
Company to pay 100% of their face amount ($280 million), plus accrued but
unpaid interest, together with a make-whole amount of approximately $9.1
million. Under the terms of the Company's Revolving Credit Agreement, such a
change in control would constitute an event of default, pursuant to which the
lenders may declare the full amount of the outstanding principal and interest
to be immediately due and payable. Following a change of control, in the
absence of the forbearance or waiver of its Senior Noteholders and lenders, the
Company might have to refinance its debt obligations. There can be no assurance
that the Company could obtain such forbearances or waivers or that replacement
financing could be obtained at a reasonable cost or an acceptable term. As of
September 30, 1999, the Company had approximately $217 million in borrowings
outstanding under its credit agreement.
Additional constraints on the Company's liquidity could occur as a result of
the Company's obligations to purchase direct reduced iron (DRI) from AIR.
Although the AIR project is financed on a non-recourse basis, both the Company
and its joint venture partner have agreed to purchase AIR's DRI production
during the term of the project financing. Pursuant to the DRI purchase
commitment, the Company has agreed to purchase one-half of the output from the
facility each year, if tendered (up to 600,000 metric tons per year). In
addition, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, AIR defaulted on $176.9
million of long-term project financing debt. The Company, AIR and the Company's
joint venture partner are currently involved in discussions with AIR's lenders
that could affect the timing or amount of AIR's debt service requirements over
the remaining term of AIR's debt agreements, as well as the Company's
obligations to AIR under the DRI purchase commitment.
Although the Company intends to dispose of its interest in AIR as a part of
its overall plan of disposal for the SBQ division, the Company could remain
obligated to purchase DRI from AIR beyond the disposal date. If the Company is
unable to find a buyer to assume its obligations under the AIR purchase
agreement and future market prices for DRI are less than the price the Company
is obligated to pay, the Company will incur losses on future merchant DRI
activities. On the other hand, if the market price of DRI increases to an
amount that exceeds the price payable under the AIR agreements, the Company
could generate future profits from merchant DRI activities. Such losses or
profits will be reflected in continuing operations in future periods until such
time as the Company is no longer obligated under the AIR agreements. Currently,
the market price of DRI is approximately $30 per ton less than the price the
Company is required to pay under the AIR purchase commitment. Assuming the
Company continues to purchase DRI from AIR at its current level of
approximately 300,000 metric tons per year and no change in the market price of
DRI, the Company will absorb approximately $9 million per year in excess DRI
costs. The Company is unable to predict whether, or how long, this situation
will continue and thus is unable to predict the amount of future losses that
may be incurred under the AIR purchase agreement.
22
<PAGE>
In addition, pursuant to the agreements recently entered into with the
Senior Noteholders, the Company is generally restricted from making payments
to AIR in excess of the amounts presently required under its agreements
relating to AIR and may be required, subject to certain exceptions set forth
in the agreements with its Senior Noteholders, to obtain the approval of its
Senior Noteholders to enter into an agreement to terminate or settle any of
its obligations relating to AIR.
In July 1998, the Board authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to
which the Company may purchase up to 1.0 million shares of its common stock in
the open market at prices not to exceed $20. As of December 24, 1998, the
Company had purchased 476,700 shares of its stock pursuant to this program.
The Company has no present intention to resume repurchase under the
authorization in the near term and is prohibited from repurchasing shares
under its amended long-term debt agreements.
Outlook
The success of the Company in the near term will depend, in large part, on
the Company's ability to (a) minimize additional losses in its SBQ operations
during the disposal period; (b) dispose of the SBQ operations (including its
interest in AIR) within the time frame anticipated; and (c) realize sufficient
proceeds from the sale of the SBQ business to enable the Company to reduce its
debt and thus provide more operational flexibility. However, management's
outlook for the continuing operations, which have proven profitable in recent
years, remains very positive. The Company expects to complete a successful
start-up of the Cartersville facility in the third quarter of fiscal 2000,
which will expand the Company's merchant product line and leverage melting
capacity throughout the organization. With continued emphasis on a shift in
product mix towards the higher-margin merchant products, the Company expects
to be able to improve operating results at its core mini-mills by increasing
volumes, reducing costs and improving gross margins.
While the Company is confident of its ability to realize the benefits of the
strategic restructuring plan, the level of benefits to be realized could be
affected by a number of factors including, without limitations, (a) the
Company's ability (i) to obtain any consents and approvals which may be
required from its creditors to consummate the sale of the SBQ business, (ii)
to find a strategic buyer or buyers willing to acquire the SBQ division and
Pacific Coast at prices that fairly value the assets, and (iii) to operate the
Company as planned in light of the highly leveraged nature of the Company, and
(b) changes in the condition of the steel industry in the United States.
Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations
The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations concerning, among other matters, waste water effluents, air
emissions and furnace dust management and disposal. Company management is
highly conscious of these regulations and supports an ongoing program to
maintain the Company's strict adherence to required standards. The Company
believes that it is currently in compliance with all known material and
applicable environmental regulations.
Year 2000
The following Year 2000 discussion is provided in response to the Securities
and Exchange Commission's interpretive statement expressing its view that
public companies should include detailed discussion of Year 2000 issues in the
MD&A section of their public filing.
The Company has completed the major portions of an organized program that
was started in 1997 to assure the Company's information technology systems and
related infrastructure will be Year 2000 compliant. The Company has divided
its Year 2000 issues into five areas including: (1) business systems at
corporate headquarters, (2) business systems at the Cleveland, Ohio operation,
(3) infrastructure systems at all locations, (4) manufacturing systems at all
locations, and (5) facility and support systems at all locations. (The Company
includes certain systems which might not be considered as IT systems, such as
phone switches and certain safety systems, in the facility and support systems
area of the Year 2000 project.) The Company's Year 2000 program
23
<PAGE>
includes three phases: (1) an audit and assessment phase designed to identify
Year 2000 issues; (2) a modification phase designed to correct Year 2000
issues (this phase includes testing of individual modifications as they are
installed); and (3) a testing phase to test entire systems for Year 2000
compliance after individual modifications have been installed and tested. A
dedicated Year 2000 project manager has been assigned to this project for over
two years. Project teams have been assembled for each area, specific
responsibilities have been identified and specific time lines have been
prepared for the activities to take place within each area of the project.
Senior management receives monthly updates on the progress against the time
lines for each strategic area.
The Company has completed Y2K testing of its business systems. The Company
completed the audit, assessment, and where required, modifications to its
business systems software in December 1998. The Company then completed
comprehensive testing of the business systems at both the corporate
headquarters and at the Cleveland, Ohio operation in January 1999. The
upgraded and Y2K tested business systems software was placed into daily
production usage at both corporate headquarters and at the Cleveland, Ohio
operation in February, 1999.
The Company had completed the second phase of its program (modifications and
testing) for the majority of the infrastructure systems, manufacturing
systems, facility and support systems as of June 30, 1999, leaving six months
of contingency time before the December 31, 1999 deadline for completion of
Year 2000 modifications of these systems. Appropriate systems testing will be
conducted during the first quarter of fiscal 2000 and problems which are
identified will then be corrected. Certain minor applications, including
desktop computer software, payroll application operating systems and hardware,
limited manufacturing systems and other ancillary applications continue to
require modification and testing.
Management has determined that the costs for correction of the Year 2000
issues, including any software and hardware changes (but excluding any
hardware systems that would have been replaced in any event) and the cost of
personnel involved in working on this project, will be less than $3 million.
The Company estimates that 80% of the costs have been spent to date. The Year
2000 upgrades are being funded out of the normal operating funds, and account
for less than 25% of the Company's IT budget.
The Company's Year 2000 program also included investigation of major
vendors' and customers' Year 2000 readiness. The Company used questionnaires,
letters and protocols to determine its vendors' and customers' Year 2000
readiness. The Company has contacted, for example, energy and scrap vendors
and its phone and data line service vendors to determine their Year 2000
compliance status. If any such vendors indicate that they will not be Year
2000 compliant, the Company will develop contingency plans to address the
issue, which may include changing vendors. In addition, the Company has
contacted significant customers to determine their progress towards Year 2000
compliance and to identify issues, if any, which might develop because of
customers' failure to be prepared for Year 2000 issues. In the event issues
are identified, the Company expects to try to develop procedures to permit the
Company to continue to supply the customer involved despite the Year 2000
issues. The Company has been assured by its key financial institutions that
they are Year 2000 compliant.
The Company is nearing completion of its Y2K compliance project and
management of the Company believes it has an effective program in place to
resolve the few remaining year 2000 issues in a timely manner. In the event
that the Company does not complete the remaining tasks, the Company could
experience problems that could result in the temporary interruption of
production at some of the steel making facilities. In addition, disruptions in
the economy generally resulting from Year 2000 issues could also materially
adversely affect the Company. The Company could be subject to litigation for
computer systems product failure, for example, failure to properly date
business records. The amount of the potential liability and lost revenue
cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
The Company has completed the development of a Year 2000 contingency plan
for its business systems. The plan involves, among other actions, manual
workarounds, increasing inventories and adjusting staffing strategies.
24
<PAGE>
Impact of Inflation
The Company has not experienced any material adverse effects on operations
in recent years because of inflation, though margins can be affected by
inflationary conditions. The Company's primary cost components are ferrous
scrap, high quality semi-finished steel billets, energy and labor, all of
which are susceptible to domestic inflationary pressures. Finished product
prices, however, are influenced by nationwide construction activity,
automotive production and manufacturing capacity within the steel industry
and, to a lesser extent, the availability of lower-priced foreign steel in the
Company's market channels. While the Company has generally been successful in
passing on cost increases through price adjustments, the effect of steel
imports, severe market price competition and under-utilized industry capacity
has in the past, and could in the future, limit the Company's ability to
adjust pricing.
Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results; Forward Looking Statements
This annual report includes forward-looking statements based on our current
expectations and projections about future events, including: market
conditions; future financial performance and potential growth; effect of
indebtedness; future cash sources and requirements, including expected capital
expenditures; competition and production costs; strategic plans, including
estimated proceeds from and the timing of asset sales including the sale of
the SBQ division, and the Company's interests in AIR and Pacific Coast;
environmental matters and liabilities; possible equipment losses; Year 2000
issues; labor relations; and other matters.
These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, including those identified in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual
Report on Form 10-K (which is incorporated herein by reference), which could
cause our actual results to differ materially from historical results or those
anticipated and certain of which are beyond our control. The words "believe,"
"expect," "anticipate" and similar expressions identify forward-looking
statements. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based
upon information available to the Company on the date hereof, and the Company
undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. It is important to note that the Company's actual results could
differ materially from those described or implied in such forward-looking
statements. Moreover, new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not
possible for the Company to predict all such risk factors, nor can the Company
assess the impact of all such risk factors on its business or the extent to
which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to
differ materially from those described or implied in any forward-looking
statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual
results.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
The Company is exposed to market risk from financial instruments that could
occur upon adverse changes in interest rates (principally U.S. treasury and
prime bank rates). In order to manage this risk, the Company attempts to
maintain a balance between fixed and variable rate debt. The Company does not
currently use derivative financial instruments. At June 30, 1999, the Company
had fixed-rate long-term debt with a carrying value of $281.4 million and
variable rate borrowings of $240.1 million outstanding. Assuming a
hypothetical 10% adverse change in interest rates with no change in the
average or outstanding amounts of long-term debt, the fair value of the
Company's fixed rate debt would decrease by $10.0 million. (However, the
Company does not expect that those debt obligations could be settled or
repurchased in the open market at the lower amount in the ordinary course of
business.) The Company also would incur an additional $1.3 million in interest
expense per year on variable rate borrowings. These amounts are determined by
considering the impact of the hypothetical change in interest rates on the
Company's cost of borrowing. The analysis does not consider the effects of the
reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an
environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management
would likely take actions to further mitigate its exposure to the change.
However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken
and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in the
Company's financial structure.
25
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30,
--------------------
1999 1998
-------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.............................. $ 935 $ 902
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful ac-
counts of $586 in 1999 and $1,370 in 1998............. 72,047 93,023
Inventories............................................ 100,330 142,246
Deferred income taxes.................................. 27,318 2,276
Other.................................................. 24,701 24,710
Net current assets of discontinued operations.......... 45,558 87,133
-------- ----------
Total current assets.................................. 270,889 350,290
Property, plant and equipment:
Land and buildings..................................... 171,089 136,546
Machinery and equipment................................ 464,531 419,009
Construction in progress............................... 18,469 57,579
-------- ----------
654,089 613,134
Less accumulated depreciation.......................... (214,527) (182,132)
-------- ----------
Net property, plant and equipment..................... 439,562 431,002
Excess of cost over net assets acquired.................. 17,769 19,897
Other.................................................... 17,120 30,071
Deferred income taxes.................................... 7,638 --
Net non-current assets of discontinued operations........ 124,488 326,755
-------- ----------
Total assets.......................................... $877,466 $1,158,015
======== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
26
<PAGE>
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS--(Continued)
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30,
--------------------
1999 1998
-------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt..... $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Accounts payable........................................ 61,144 64,016
Accrued payroll expenses................................ 8,026 10,548
Accrued operating expenses.............................. 8,105 8,514
Other current liabilities............................... 16,636 19,539
Allowance for operating losses of discontinued
operations............................................. 56,544 --
-------- ----------
Total current liabilities............................. 160,455 112,617
Deferred income taxes.................................... -- 47,922
Deferred liabilities..................................... 9,167 6,955
Long-term debt, less current portion..................... 469,135 516,439
Minority interest in subsidiary.......................... 7,978 13,475
Stockholders' equity:
30Preferred stock, par value $.01; authorized: 5,000
shares................................................. -- --
Common stock, par value $.01; authorized: 75,000 shares;
issued: 29,836 in 1999 and 29,780 in 1998............... 298 298
Additional paid-in capital.............................. 329,056 331,859
Treasury stock, 150 and 191 shares in 1999 and 1998,
respectively, at cost.................................. (791) (2,929)
Unearned compensation................................... (718) (912)
Retained earnings (deficiency).......................... (97,114) 132,291
-------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity............................ 230,731 460,607
-------- ----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........... $877,466 $1,158,015
======== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
27
<PAGE>
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
-----------------------------
1999 1998 1997
--------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales....................................... $ 709,876 $836,875 $667,716
Cost of sales:
Other than depreciation and amortization...... 568,688 689,347 555,684
Depreciation and amortization................. 40,227 37,954 32,739
--------- -------- --------
Gross profit.................................... 100,961 109,574 79,293
Pre-operating/start-up costs.................... 12,854 1,305 6,730
Selling, general and administrative expense..... 36,625 44,214 33,492
Interest expense................................ 24,248 17,261 11,906
--------- -------- --------
27,234 46,794 27,165
Other income, net............................... 9,930 12,794 4,704
Loss from equity investments.................... (24,563) (18,326) (1,566)
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary......... 5,497 1,643 2,347
--------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations before income
taxes.......................................... 18,098 42,905 32,650
Provision for income taxes...................... 14,814 14,960 12,863
--------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations............... 3,284 27,945 19,787
Discontinued operations:
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
income tax benefit........................... (54,337) (26,316) (5,370)
Loss on disposal of SBQ business, including
estimated losses during disposal period (net
of income tax benefit of $78,704)............ (173,183) -- --
--------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)............................... $(224,236) $ 1,629 $ 14,417
========= ======== ========
Weighted average shares outstanding............. 29,481 29,674 29,091
========= ======== ========
Basic and diluted per share amounts:
Income from continuing operations............. $ 0.11 $ 0.94 $ 0.68
Loss on discontinued operations............... (7.72) (0.89) (0.18)
--------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)............................... $ (7.61) $ 0.05 $ 0.50
========= ======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
28
<PAGE>
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
--------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Income from continuing operations............ $ 3,284 $ 27,945 $ 19,787
Adjustments to reconcile income from
continuing operations to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization.............. 40,227 37,954 32,739
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable. 226 41 83
Deferred income taxes...................... 10,267 742 4,196
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary.... (5,497) (1,643) (2,347)
Gain on sale of equity interest in
subsidiaries, idle facilities and
equipment................................. (49) (5,354) (1,746)
Loss from equity investments............... 24,563 18,326 1,566
Other...................................... 2,168 4,035 2,451
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of effects from business acquisitions:
Accounts receivable........................ 20,750 (221) (14,570)
Inventories................................ 41,916 (7,432) (14,160)
Other current assets....................... (9,391) 596 (14,648)
Accounts payable........................... (2,872) 3,638 4,486
Other accrued liabilities.................. (5,834) 6,730 (20,349)
Deferred liabilities....................... 2,212 1,022 327
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities of continuing operations....... 121,970 86,379 (2,185)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities of discontinued operations..... 2,923 (37,750) 30,792
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities.. 124,893 48,629 28,607
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property, plant and equipment... (121,808) (66,615) (20,373)
Proceeds from sale/leaseback................. 75,104 -- --
Payment for business acquisition............. -- -- (43,309)
Proceeds from sale of equity investment in
subsidiaries, property, plant and equipment
and idle facilities......................... 839 29,832 5,567
Equity investments........................... -- (15,016) (9,300)
Increase in other non-current assets......... (2,958) (7,239) (12,522)
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities of
continuing operations..................... (48,823) (59,038) (79,937)
Net cash used in investing activities of
discontinued operations................... (20,239) (18,700) (180,767)
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities...... (69,062) (77,738) (260,704)
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
29
<PAGE>
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS--(Continued)
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
-----------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
----------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net short-term borrowings and repay-
ments.................................. $ (10,000) $ 10,000 $ --
Proceeds from issuance of long-term
debt................................... -- 1,500 --
Borrowings under revolving credit facil-
ity.................................... 1,993,941 2,056,773 771,785
Payments on revolving credit facility... (2,031,245) (2,025,390) (579,229)
Stock compensation plan, net............ 3 358 310
Purchase of treasury stock.............. (3,209) (2,318) --
Issuance of treasury stock.............. -- -- 19,188
Cash dividends paid..................... (5,169) (11,871) (11,661)
----------- ----------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities of continuing
operations........................... (55,679) 29,052 200,393
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities of discontinued
operations........................... (119) -- 26,000
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities............................... (55,798) 29,052 226,393
----------- ----------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents.............................. 33 (57) (5,704)
Cash and cash equivalents at:
Beginning of year....................... 902 959 6,663
End of year............................. $ 935 $ 902 $ 959
=========== =========== =========
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest (net of amounts capitalized)... $ 35,504 $ 29,231 $ 19,383
Income taxes paid (refunded), net....... (1,801) 6,132 13,808
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
30
<PAGE>
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30, 1999, 1998, and 1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock Additional Treasury Stock Retained Total
------------- Paid-in ---------------- Unearned Earnings Stockholders'
Shares Amount Capital Shares Amount Compensation (Deficiency) Equity
------ ------ ---------- ------ -------- ------------ ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at June 30,
1996................... 29,680 $297 $331,430 (1,071) $(21,148) $(2,165) $ 139,777 $ 448,191
Options exercised, net
of tax benefit......... 56 -- 359 15 314 (541) -- 132
Public offering......... -- -- (650) 1,000 19,838 -- -- 19,188
Reduction of unearned
compensation........... -- -- -- -- -- 1,281 -- 1,281
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,417 14,417
Cash dividends declared,
$.40 per share......... -- -- -- -- -- -- (11,661) (11,661)
------ ---- -------- ------ -------- ------- --------- ---------
Balances at June 30,
1997................... 29,736 297 331,139 (56) (996) (1,425) 142,533 471,548
Options exercised, net
of tax benefit......... 44 1 720 24 385 (261) -- 845
Purchase of treasury
stock.................. -- -- -- (159) (2,318) -- -- (2,318)
Reduction of unearned
compensation........... -- -- -- -- -- 774 -- 774
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,629 1,629
Cash dividends declared,
$.40 per share......... -- -- -- -- -- -- (11,871) (11,871)
------ ---- -------- ------ -------- ------- --------- ---------
Balances at June 30,
1998................... 29,780 298 331,859 (191) (2,929) (912) 132,291 460,607
Options exercised and
shares issued
(repurchased) under
stock compensation
plans, net............. 56 -- (108) 56 716 (615) -- (7)
Purchase of treasury
stock.................. -- -- -- (477) (3,209) -- -- (3,209)
Issuance of treasury
shares to employee
benefit plan........... -- -- (2,695) 462 4,631 -- -- 1,936
Reduction of unearned
compensation........... -- -- -- -- -- 809 -- 809
Net loss................ -- -- -- -- -- -- (224,236) (224,236)
Cash dividends declared,
$.175 per share........ -- -- -- -- -- -- (5,169) (5,169)
------ ---- -------- ------ -------- ------- --------- ---------
Balances at June 30,
1999................... 29,836 $298 $329,056 (150) $ (791) $ (718) $ (97,114) $ 230,731
====== ==== ======== ====== ======== ======= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
31
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
1. Description of the Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Description of the Business
Birmingham Steel Corporation (the Company) owns and operates facilities in
the mini-mill sector of the steel industry. In addition, the Company owns
equity interests in scrap collection and processing operations. From these
facilities, which are located across the United States and Canada, the Company
produces a variety of steel products including semi-finished steel billets,
reinforcing bars and merchant products such as rounds, flats, squares, strips,
angles and channels. These products are sold primarily to customers in the
steel fabrication, manufacturing and construction business. The Company has
regional warehouse and distribution facilities which sell its finished
products.
In addition, the Company's SBQ (special bar quality) line of business, which
is reported in discontinued operations (See Note 2), produces high-quality rod,
bar and wire that is sold primarily to customers in the automotive,
agricultural, industrial fastener, welding, appliance, and aerospace industries
in the United States and Canada.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Equity Method of Accounting
Investments in 50% or less owned affiliates where the Company has substantial
influence over the affiliate are accounted for using the equity method of
accounting. Under the equity method, the investment is carried at cost of
acquisition plus additional investments and advances and the Company's share of
undistributed earnings or losses since acquisition. Reserves are provided where
management determines that the investment or equity in earnings is not
realizable.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from sales of steel products is recorded at the time the goods are
shipped or when title passes, if later.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts
reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash
equivalents approximate their fair values.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. The cost of
inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
Long-lived Assets and Depreciation
The Company recognizes impairment losses on long-lived assets used in
operations, including allocated goodwill, when impairment indicators are
present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are less than their carrying values. Long-lived assets held for disposal
are valued at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method for
financial reporting purposes and accelerated methods for income tax purposes.
Estimated useful lives range from ten to thirty years for buildings and from
five to twenty-five years for machinery and equipment.
32
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Excess of Cost Over Net Assets Acquired
The excess of cost over net assets acquired (goodwill) is amortized on a
straight-line basis over periods not exceeding twenty years. Accumulated
amortization of goodwill applicable to continuing operations was approximately
$8,947,000 and $6,819,000 at June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Accumulated
amortization of goodwill applicable to discontinued operations amounted to
$8,932,000 and $7,339,000 at June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively (See Note 2).
The carrying value of goodwill is reviewed if the facts and circumstances
suggest that it may be impaired. If such review indicates that goodwill will
not be recoverable based upon the undiscounted expected future cash flows over
the remaining amortization period, the Company's carrying value of the goodwill
is reduced by the excess of carrying value over fair value.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between taxable
income and financial reporting income in accordance with FASB Statement 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes.
Earnings per Share
Earnings per share are presented in accordance with FASB Statement No. 128,
Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted
average number of outstanding common shares for the period. Diluted earnings
per share is computed using the weighted average number of outstanding common
shares and any dilutive equivalents. Options to purchase 1,061,000, 827,000 and
544,000 shares of common stock at average prices of $15.89, $17.21, and $16.99
per share were outstanding at June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, but
were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
options' exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common
shares.
Pre-operating and Start-up Costs
The Company recognizes pre-operating and start-up costs as expense when
incurred. The Company considers a facility to be in "start-up" until it reaches
commercially viable production levels. During the start-up period, costs
incurred in excess of expected normal levels, including non-recurring operating
losses, are classified as pre-operating/start-up costs in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
Credit Risk
The Company extends credit, primarily on the basis of 30-day terms, to
various companies in a variety of industrial market sectors. The Company does
not believe it has a significant concentration of credit risk in any one
geographic area or market segment. The Company performs periodic credit
evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral.
Historically, credit losses have not been significant.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (as amended by Statement No. 137, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities--Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 133). This pronouncement, which becomes effective in fiscal 2002,
is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial position
or results of operations because the Company does not presently use derivatives
or engage in hedging activities.
33
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
2.Discontinued Operations
On August 18, 1999, the Board of Directors authorized management to sell the
Company's SBQ operations, which includes rod, bar and wire facilities in
Cleveland, Ohio; a high quality melt shop in Memphis, Tennessee; and the
Company's 50% interest in American Iron Reduction, L.L.C. (AIR). The Company's
decision to discontinue its SBQ operations was attributable to continuing
financial and operational challenges which have required a major commitment of
management and financial resources and have constrained the Company's financial
flexibility while significantly increasing its debt. Immediately after the
Board's authorization, the Company formalized its plan of disposal and
authorized an investment banking firm to coordinate the efforts to effect the
sale of the SBQ operations. The Company expects that the sale will be completed
by May 2000. Accordingly, as required by APB Opinion 30 (as interpreted by EITF
95-18) the operating results of the SBQ line of business for fiscal 1999 and
all prior periods presented herein have been restated and reported in
discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements.
As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the Company recorded
a $173,183,000 estimated loss ($5.87 per share) on the sale of the SBQ
operations, which included a $56,544,000 provision (pre-tax) for estimated
losses during the expected disposal period. These charges are combined with the
fiscal 1999 operating losses of the division ($54,337,000, net of income tax
benefits) and presented as discontinued operations in the fiscal 1999 financial
statements. The proceeds expected to be realized on the sale of the SBQ
operations and the expected operating losses during the disposal period are
based on management's estimates of the most likely outcome, considering, among
other things, informal appraisals from the Company's investment bankers and the
Company's knowledge of valuations for steel production assets. However, the
actual amounts ultimately realized on sale and losses incurred during the
expected disposal period could differ materially from the amounts assumed in
arriving at the loss on disposal. To the extent actual proceeds or operating
losses during the expected disposal period differ from the estimates that are
reflected in the 1999 financial statements, the variance will be reported in
discontinued operations in future periods.
Management expects to use the proceeds from the sale to: (a) settle its
obligations under a lease agreement for equipment at the Memphis facility
(approximately $74,000,000); (b) pay estimated transaction expenses
($8,000,000); and (c) retire industrial revenue bonds and other debt
specifically associated with the SBQ assets ($42,224,000). The balance of the
proceeds will be used to pay down a portion of the Company's other long-term
debt.
Operating results of the discontinued SBQ operations were as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
----------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales......................................... $270,398 $299,144 $311,233
Costs of sales.................................... 298,618 291,319 304,331
-------- -------- --------
Gross profit (loss)............................... (28,220) 7,825 6,902
Start-up costs.................................... 37,881 32,933 3,904
Selling, general and administrative expenses...... 9,501 4,431 3,178
Interest expense.................................. 11,016 11,747 8,289
Other income (expense)............................ 1,357 1,174 557
-------- -------- --------
Loss before income taxes.......................... (85,261) (40,112) (7,912)
Income tax benefit................................ (30,924) (13,796) (2,542)
-------- -------- --------
Net loss.......................................... $(54,337) $(26,316) $ (5,370)
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
34
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Start-up costs reflected in discontinued operations primarily represent
excess production costs and other expenses, such as employee training, incurred
at the Memphis facility, which began start-up operations in November 1997.
Although the Memphis facility achieved a break-even production run rate in the
month of March 1999, it has been unable to consistently sustain break-even
production levels. Accordingly, its excess production and other start-up costs
are shown separately in start-up costs in the preceding table.
Corporate overhead expenses, historically allocated and charged to the SBQ
operations, were reversed and allocated back to continuing operations because
those expenses were not considered to be directly attributable to discontinued
operations. Expenses allocated back to continuing operations totaled $7,728,000
and $3,627,000 in fiscal 1997 and 1998, respectively. No corporate overhead
expenses were allocated to discontinued operations in 1999. However, beginning
July 1, 1998 the Company reorganized its executive management, sales and
administration functions to more closely align the organization with the
specific needs of each respective business unit. As a part of that realignment,
management, sales, and administrative personnel were assigned to specific
business units, including SBQ, and the costs associated with those personnel
became direct expenses of their respective business units.
Interest expense attributable to discontinued operations includes interest on
industrial revenue bonds and other debt specifically associated with the assets
to be sold plus an allocation of interest on general corporate credit
facilities. Interest on borrowings under the Company's general credit
facilities is allocated to discontinued operations based on the ratio of net
assets of the discontinued operations before long-term debt to total
consolidated net assets before long-term debt, except that the total amount
allocated is limited to the expected reduction in interest expense that will
occur upon sale of the SBQ assets and the use of the sale proceeds to repay
debt.
Assets and liabilities of the discontinued SBQ operations have been reflected
in the consolidated balance sheets as current or non-current based on the
original classification of the accounts, except that current liabilities are
netted against current assets and non-current liabilities are netted against
non-current assets. Net non-current assets also reflect a valuation allowance
of $195,342,000 to recognize the estimated loss on disposal. The following is a
summary of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30,
-------------------
1999 1998
--------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Accounts receivable, net................................ $ 32,414 $ 28,831
Inventories............................................. 61,471 101,030
Other................................................... 1,303 980
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable........................................ (35,190) (28,799)
Other accrued expenses.................................. (14,440) (14,909)
--------- --------
Net current assets of discontinued operations............. $ 45,558 $ 87,133
========= ========
Non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depre-
ciation................................................ $ 325,999 $326,493
Goodwill and other non-current assets................... 23,580 25,320
Investment in American Iron Reduction, LLC.............. 13,889 17,998
Provision for estimated loss on disposal of discontinued
operations............................................. (195,342) --
Non-current liabilities:
Long-term debt.......................................... (42,224) (42,381)
Other non-current liabilities........................... (1,414) (675)
--------- --------
Net non-current assets of discontinued operations......... $ 124,488 $326,755
========= ========
</TABLE>
35
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
An accrual for the estimated (pre-tax) losses to be incurred during the
expected disposal period of $56,544,000 is presented separately in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets for fiscal 1999. Such amount excludes
corporate overhead, but includes approximately $13,800,000 of interest
expense, which represents the amount allocable to the SBQ operations up to the
estimated reduction in consolidated interest expense that is expected to occur
upon receipt of the proceeds from the sale.
There are no material contingent liabilities related to discontinued
operations, such as product or environmental liabilities or litigation, that
are expected to remain with the Company after the disposal of the SBQ
business.
American Iron Reduction, L.L.C.
Through June 30, 1999, the Company had made equity investments of
$23,750,000 in AIR, a 50% owned joint venture that operates a direct reduced
iron (DRI) facility in Convent, Louisiana. AIR commenced operations in January
1998. For financial reporting purposes, AIR is accounted for as an equity
method investee. The Company recognizes its share of operating profits or
losses of AIR as a component of cost of sales because AIR is a captive
supplier of raw materials. Substantially all of the Company's DRI purchases
from AIR are used at the Company's Memphis facility as a substitute for
premium, low-residual scrap.
The Company intends to dispose of its investment in AIR as a part of its
plan of disposal for the SBQ line of business. Accordingly, the Company's net
investment in AIR and its share of AIR's operating results for all periods
presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are included
in discontinued operations.
Following is condensed financial information of AIR for the periods
indicated (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30,
------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Current assets.............................................. $ 23,864 $ 39,431
Non-current assets.......................................... 199,655 210,446
Current liabilities......................................... 8,768 29,019
Long-term debt ($178,908 in default at June 30, 1999)........ 184,908. 184,908
Equity...................................................... 29,843 35,950
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June
30,
------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales................................................... $ 32,455 $ 38,230
Gross profit (loss)......................................... 4,603 (61)
Net loss.................................................... (7,988) (4,020)
</TABLE>
Under the AIR Equity Contribution Agreement, the Company may be obligated to
make additional equity investments in AIR of not more than $3,750,000.
In connection with AIR's project financing agreements, the Company has
agreed to purchase 50% of AIR's annual DRI production, if tendered (up to
600,000 metric tons) at prices which are equivalent to AIR's total production
cost (excluding depreciation and amortization but including debt service
payments under AIR's project finance obligations). The Company's DRI purchases
from AIR amounted to $43,683,000 (297,000 metric tons) and $24,178,000
(177,000 metric tons) in 1999 and 1998, respectively.
36
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The fixed and determinable portion of the Company's DRI purchase commitment,
representing 50% of AIR's debt service on project finance indebtedness through
August 1, 2026, is scheduled as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Fiscal Year Ending June 30:
2000............................................................. $ 3,748
2001............................................................. 14,712
2002............................................................. 15,165
2003............................................................. 15,671
2004............................................................. 16,257
Thereafter....................................................... 81,423
--------
$146,976
========
</TABLE>
The AIR project is financed on a non-recourse basis to the Company and the
other venture partner, although the partners have agreed to purchase one-half
of the output of the facility, if tendered. During the fourth quarter of fiscal
1999, AIR defaulted on $178,908,000 of non-recourse long-term project finance
debt. The Company, AIR and the other venture partner are currently involved in
workout discussions that could affect the timing or amount of AIR's debt
service requirements over the remaining term of the debt agreements, as well as
the Company's obligations under the DRI purchase agreement.
Although the Company intends to dispose of its interest in AIR as a part of
its overall plan of disposal for the SBQ line of business, the Company could
remain obligated to purchase DRI from AIR beyond the disposal date. If the
Company is unable to find a buyer to assume its obligations under the AIR
purchase agreement and future market prices for DRI are less than the price the
Company is obligated to pay, the Company will incur losses on future merchant
DRI activities. On the other hand, if the market price of DRI increases to an
amount that exceeds the price payable under the AIR agreements, the Company
could generate future profits from merchant DRI activities. Such losses or
profits will be reflected in continuing operations in future periods until such
time as the Company is no longer obligated under the AIR agreements. Currently,
the market price of DRI is less than the price the Company is required to pay
under the AIR agreements. Based on such current market prices, such losses
would aggregate approximately $9,000,000 per year on a pre-tax basis, assuming
the Company continues to purchase DRI at a normalized level of 300,000 metric
tons per year. However, the Company is unable to predict whether, or how long,
the current market pricing will continue and thus is unable to predict the
amount of future losses that may be incurred under the AIR purchase agreement.
Accordingly, no provision for estimated losses on future merchant DRI
activities has been provided in the accompanying financial statements.
3. Investment in Affiliated Companies
On September 24, 1997, the Company purchased approximately 25% of the
outstanding shares of Laclede Steel Company (LCLD), a public company, for
$14,953,000. Through June 30, 1998, the Company accounted for its investment in
LCLD using the equity method. For the period from September 24, 1997 through
June 30, 1998, the Company recognized $2,715,000 in losses on its investment in
LCLD representing its share of LCLD's reported net loss for the period and
amortization of the excess of the purchase price of the LCLD shares over the
Company's proportionate interest in the net assets of LCLD. In June 1998, the
Company determined that the remaining carrying amount of its investment in LCLD
was impaired because, among other things: the market price of LCLD common
shares had declined significantly since the Company made its investment; LCLD
had continued to incur operating losses; and LCLD announced a restructuring
plan that had a material effect on its financial position and future results of
operations. Accordingly, the Company recognized a $12,383,000 impairment loss
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998 to reduce the carrying amount of its
investment. The loss is included in Loss from equity investments in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
37
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
On September 18, 1996, the Company and an affiliate of Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
formed Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC (Pacific Coast), a 50/50 joint venture
established to operate in southern California as a collector, processor and
seller of scrap. Through June 30, 1999, the Company has invested approximately
$29,400,000 in Pacific Coast, including loans of $20,150,000, and has
recognized losses of $4,930,000, $3,144,000, and $1,126,000 in fiscal 1999,
1998 and 1997, respectively, in applying the equity method. During fiscal 1999,
the Company continually evaluated its investment in Pacific Coast in the
context of current conditions in the Asian scrap export market as well as the
ability of Pacific Coast to competitively participate in the domestic scrap
market. After carefully reviewing its options, management and the Board of
Directors determined that Pacific Coast was no longer a strategic fit for the
Company's core mini-mill operations and decided not to continue its support of
the operations. The Company then re-evaluated the carrying amount of its
investment and concluded that it should be written down in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 1999. The provision for loss of $19,275,000 is reflected in "Loss
from equity investments" within continuing operations in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has guaranteed 50% of Pacific Coast's obligations under an
operating lease that requires Pacific Coast to pay annual rent of approximately
$3,783,000 through November 2019.
The Company also owns a 50% interest in Richmond Steel Recycling Limited
(RSR), a scrap processing facility located in Richmond, British Columbia,
Canada, which is accounted for using the equity method.
The Company records its share of income and losses in equity investees on a
one month lag. Investments in and advances to equity investees included in
continuing operations have been reflected in other assets in the balance sheet
and are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30,
--------------
1999 1998
------ -------
<S> <C> <C>
Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC, net of provision of $19,275 in
1999....................................................... $ -- $23,605
Richmond Steel Recycling Limited............................ 4,015 4,352
------ -------
$4,015 $27,957
====== =======
</TABLE>
The following condensed financial information of Pacific Coast has been
derived from its financial statements for the periods indicated (data for RSR
is not significant and therefore has not been presented) (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30,
----------------
1999 1998
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Current assets.......................................... $ 7,325 $13,136
Non-current assets...................................... 34,331 36,603
Current liabilities (including advances from the Company
of $10,000 in 1999 and 1998)........................... 24,991 23,618
Non-current liabilities (including advances from the
Company of $10,150 and $10,000 in 1999 and 1998, re-
spectively)............................................ 21,537 21,872
Equity (deficit)........................................ (4,872) 4,249
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
Years Ended September 18, 1996
June 30, (inception) to June 30,
---------------- -----------------------
1999 1998 1997
------- ------- -----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales........................ $37,183 $65,644 $18,720
Gross profit..................... 10,319 15,555 5,553
Net loss......................... (9,122) (7,044) (3,707)
</TABLE>
38
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
4.Inventories
Inventories as of June 30 were valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-
out) or market as summarized in the following table (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Continuing Operations Discontinued Operations
--------------------- ------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Raw materials and mill supplies. $ 33,652 $ 45,020 $ 19,006 $ 16,413
Work-in-progress................ 13,986 17,833 26,942 66,492
Finished goods.................. 52,692 79,393 15,523 18,125
---------- ---------- ----------- ------------
$ 100,330 $ 142,246 $ 61,471 $ 101,030
========== ========== =========== ============
</TABLE>
5. Capital Expenditures and Interest Expense
Capital expenditures, capitalized interest on qualifying assets under
construction and total interest incurred for continuing and discontinued
operations were as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Continuing Discontinued Consolidated
Operations Operations Total
---------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Capital expenditures:
Fiscal 1999.............................. $121,808 $ 18,869 $140,677
Fiscal 1998.............................. 66,615 79,952 146,567
Fiscal 1997.............................. 20,373 176,607 196,980
Capitalized interest:
Fiscal 1999.............................. $ 4,345 $ 620 $ 4,965
Fiscal 1998.............................. 1,791 4,695 6,486
Fiscal 1997.............................. 2,594 6,254 8,848
Total interest incurred:
Fiscal 1999.............................. $ 28,593 $ 11,636 $ 40,229
Fiscal 1998.............................. 19,052 16,442 35,494
Fiscal 1997.............................. 14,500 14,543 29,043
</TABLE>
At June 30, 1999, the estimated costs to complete authorized projects under
construction amounted to $12,126,000.
6. Short-Term Borrowing Arrangements
The Company has a five year, unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement which
provides for unsecured borrowings of up to $300,000,000 at variable market
interest rates. Approximately $109,332,000 was available under this credit
facility at June 30, 1999.
Under a line of credit arrangement for short-term borrowings, the Company may
borrow up to $20,000,000 with interest at market rates mutually agreed upon by
the Company and the lender. At June 30, 1999, $20,000,000 was available under
this facility.
39
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following information relates to the Company's borrowings under short-
term credit facilities (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
--------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Maximum amount outstanding.......................... $20,000 $35,000 $180,374
Average amount outstanding.......................... 14,780 9,951 79,956
Weighted average interest rate...................... 5.9% 6.0% 5.8%
</TABLE>
7.Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30,
------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Continuing Operations:
Senior Notes, $130,000 face amount; interest at 7.83% and
7.28% at June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively, due in
2005.................................................... $130,000 $130,000
Senior Notes, $150,000 face amount; interest at 7.60% and
7.05% at June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively, due in
2002 and 2005........................................... 150,000 150,000
$300,000 Revolving line of credit, payable in 2002;
weighted average interest of 6.88% and 6.40% at June 30,
1999 and 1998, respectively, payable in 2002............ 186,635 223,939
Capital lease obligations, interest rates principally
ranging from 43% to 45% of bank prime, payable in 1999
and 2001................................................ 12,500 12,500
-------- --------
479,135 516,439
Less: current portion.................................... (10,000) --
-------- --------
$469,135 $516,439
======== ========
Discontinued Operations:
Promissory Note, interest at 5.0%, payable in install-
ments through 2008...................................... $ 1,382 $ 1,500
Industrial Revenue Bonds, interest rates principally
ranging from 44% to 45% of bank prime, payable in 2025
and 2026................................................ 41,000 41,000
-------- --------
42,382 42,500
Less: current portion.................................... (158) (119)
-------- --------
$ 42,224 $ 42,381
======== ========
</TABLE>
The aggregate fair value of the Company's long-term debt obligations is
approximately $495,067,000 compared to the carrying value of $521,517,000 at
June 30, 1999. The fair value of the Company's fixed rate Senior Notes is
estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on the new rates that will
apply to the Senior Notes on the effective date of the amendments described
below. The discounted present value calculation does not include prepayment
penalties that might be paid under the debt agreements and thus prevent the
Company from realizing any of the implied gain.
40
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Future maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Continuing Discontinued Consolidated
Operations Operations Total
---------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fiscal Year Ending June 30:
2000..................................... $ 10,000 $ 158 $ 10,158
2001..................................... -- 99 99
2002..................................... 215,135 138 215,273
2003..................................... 105,500 145 105,645
2004..................................... 29,500 152 29,652
Thereafter............................... 119,000 41,690 160,690
-------- ------- --------
$479,135 $42,382 $521,517
======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
At June 30, 1999 the Company was not in compliance with the interest coverage
covenants pertaining to its $150,000,000 and $130,000,000 Senior Notes, its
$300,000,000 Revolving Credit Agreement and letter of credit agreements
underlying its capital lease and industrial revenue bond obligations. On
October 13, 1999, the Company and its lenders executed amendments to the debt
and letter of credit agreements. Among other things, the lenders and
noteholders waived their right to call the debt as a result of the previously
existing violations and agreed to amend the financial covenants. In return, the
Company granted the lenders a security interest in substantially all assets of
the Company and agreed to pay interest (described below) at higher rates. The
Company also agreed to pay modification fees of approximately $1,100,000.
The new covenants require the Company to achieve varying levels of earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and fixed charge
coverage ratios. In addition, quarterly dividend and all other restricted
payments, as defined, are limited to the lesser of $750,000 or 50% of income
from continuing operations. The covenants also restrict capital expenditures
and establish minimum tangible net worth requirements. The amended Senior Note
and Revolving Credit Agreements also require the Company to use the net
proceeds from the sale of the SBQ business (See Note 2) to reduce its
outstanding obligations under those agreements. In addition, in the event that
the Company is unable to sell the SBQ division by January 31, 2001, the Company
will incur a 100 basis point increase in the interest rates under the Revolving
Credit Agreement and each of the Senior Notes, which would be reduced to 50
basis points upon a subsequent sale of the SBQ division.
Based upon the current level of the Company's operations and current industry
conditions, the Company anticipates that it will have sufficient resources to
make all required interest and principal payments under the credit agreement
and Senior Notes through December 15, 2001. However, the Company is required to
make significant principal repayments on December 15, 2001 and, accordingly,
may be required to refinance its obligations under the Revolving Credit
Agreement and Senior Notes on or prior to such date. There can be no assurance
that any such refinancing would be possible at such time, or, if possible, that
acceptable terms could be obtained, particularly in view of the Company's high
level of debt, the restrictive covenants under the financing agreements, the
Company's obligations to AIR (See Note 2) and the fact that substantially all
of the Company's assets have been pledged to the banks and Senior Noteholders.
Following is a summary of significant provisions of the amended debt
agreements.
Revolving Credit Agreement--As amended, the Revolving Credit Agreement
continues to provide for maximum outstanding borrowings of $300,000,000 until
maturity in March 2002, except that availability will be limited to
$250,000,000 in October 1999, $260,000,000 in November 1999 and $270,000,000 in
the month of December 1999. Availability under the facility will be reduced
when and to the extent that proceeds from the sale of the SBQ business are
applied to the outstanding balance due at the time of the sale. Interest will
continue at variable rates based on either the London Interbank Offer Rate
(LIBOR) or at the lenders' prime rates in effect
41
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
from time to time. The spread for LIBOR base rate borrowings under the
Revolving Credit Agreement will increase from 1% at June 30, 1999 to 2.25% for
outstanding borrowings after the effective date of the amendment (2% for LIBOR
based borrowings in excess of $235,000,000). The spread for prime rate
borrowings will increase from .5% at June 30, 1999 to .75% for outstanding
borrowings after the effective date of the amendment (.5% for prime rate
borrowings in excess of $235 million).
Senior Notes--The weighted average interest rates on the Senior Notes, which
remain fixed for the terms of the obligations, were increased 2.2% (versus the
rates in effect at June 30, 1999) to 10.03% on the $130,000,000 Senior Notes
and 9.8% on the $150,000,000 Senior Notes. Scheduled principal payments on the
Senior Notes were not affected by the amendment, except that a portion of the
net proceeds from the planned sale of the SBQ business must be applied to
reduce the principal. As modified, the present value of the remaining payments
due on the Senior Notes exceeds the present value of the scheduled debt service
payments prior to the modification. Accordingly, for accounting purposes the
modification of the Senior Note obligations will be accounted for as a debt
extinguishment. The Company expects to incur an extraordinary loss on
extinguishment of approximately $1,300,000, or $.04 per share, in its financial
results for the second quarter of fiscal 2000.
Change in Control Provisions--Under the Company's debt agreements, a change
in a majority of the Company's Board of Directors, including as a result of a
contested proxy solicitation, such as is currently being waged by a dissident
shareholder group, could give rise, among other things, to the acceleration of
the Company's debt obligations and may, as a result, have a material adverse
effect on the Company, its financial condition and its operations. In the event
of such a change in control, the Company would be required to make an offer to
prepay its Senior Notes which, if accepted, would obligate the Company to pay
100% of their face amount ($280 million), plus accrued but unpaid interest,
together with a "make-whole" amount of approximately $9.1 million. Under the
terms of the Company's Revolving Credit Agreement, such a change in control
would constitute an event of default, pursuant to which the lenders may declare
the full amount of the outstanding principal and interest to be immediately due
and payable.
Following a change in control, in the absence of the forbearance or waiver
from its Senior Noteholders and lenders the Company might have to refinance its
debt obligations. There can be no assurance that the Company could obtain such
forbearances or waivers or that replacement financing could be obtained at a
reasonable cost or an acceptable term.
In addition, a change in control of a majority of the Board of Directors of
the Company could trigger the payment of approximately $15,441,000 to key
officers and employees under the Company's Executive Severance Plan assuming
the employment of such officers and employees were terminated following such a
change in control.
8 .Commitments
The Company leases office space and certain production equipment under
operating lease agreements. Following is a schedule by year of future minimum
rental payments, net of minimum rentals on subleases, required under operating
leases that have initial lease terms in excess of one year (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Continuing Discontinued Consolidated
Operations Operations Total
---------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fiscal Year Ending June 30,
2000..................................... $12,668 $ 7,274 $ 19,942
2001..................................... 12,132 7,063 19,195
2002..................................... 12,071 6,897 18,968
2003..................................... 11,980 6,791 18,771
2004..................................... 11,282 6,706 17,988
Thereafter............................... 36,877 63,033 99,910
------- ------- --------
$97,010 $97,764 $194,774
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
42
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Rental expense under operating lease agreements charged to continuing
operations was $1,931,000, $681,000, and $866,000 in fiscal 1999, 1998 and
1997, respectively. Rental expense charged to discontinued operations was
$7,135,000, $3,306,000, and $289,000 during those same periods.
The Company has a fifteen year operating lease on production equipment in the
Memphis melt shop. Future minimum lease payments required by the lease are
reflected in the preceding table under discontinued operations. The Company has
options to purchase the equipment both prior to and at the end of the lease for
amounts that are expected to approximate fair market value at the exercise date
of the options. The remaining lease obligation is expected to be either settled
or assumed by the buyer in connection with the disposal of the SBQ operations
(See Note 2).
In fiscal 1999, the Company executed two sale/leaseback transactions with
respect to equipment at the Cartersville facility. Total proceeds from the
sale/leaseback transactions were $75,104,000, which approximated the fair value
of the equipment at the dates of the transactions. The Company has options to
purchase the equipment both prior to and at the end of the lease terms, which
range from eight to ten years, for amounts that are expected to approximate
fair market value at the exercise date of the options.
Under a 1995 contract with Electronic Data Systems (EDS), an information
management and consulting firm, the Company is obligated to pay $4,935,000 per
year through 2005 for information systems development, technical support and
consulting services.
9.Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components
of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30,
-----------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Tax depreciation in excess of book depreciation...... $(87,081) $(70,092)
Deferred Tax Assets:
Allowance for loss on disposal of discontinued opera-
tions............................................... 60,214 --
Allowance for operating losses of discontinued opera-
tions............................................... 21,478 --
Federal net operating loss carryforwards............. 15,144 --
State net operating loss carryforwards............... 3,742 --
AMT credit carryforwards............................. 7,988 7,455
Deferred compensation................................ 3,339 2,878
Worker's compensation................................ 1,155 1,771
Inventories.......................................... 2,415 2,118
Equity investments................................... 17,157 4,168
Other, net........................................... 6,754 6,056
-------- --------
Gross deferred tax assets............................ 139,386 24,446
Less valuation allowance............................. (17,349) --
-------- --------
Deferred tax assets.................................. 122,037 24,446
-------- --------
Net deferred tax asset (liability)................... $ 34,956 $(45,646)
======== ========
Balance Sheet Classification:
Current asset........................................ $ 27,318 $ 2,276
Non-current asset (liability)........................ 7,638 (47,922)
-------- --------
$ 34,956 $(45,646)
======== ========
</TABLE>
43
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The provisions for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
----------------------------
1999 1998 1997
--------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Continuing operations:
Current:
Federal....................................... $ 662 $ 13,234 $ 7,236
State......................................... 3,885 984 1,431
--------- -------- -------
4,547 14,218 8,667
Deferred:
Federal....................................... 12,005 1,126 3,300
State......................................... (1,738) (384) 896
--------- -------- -------
10,267 742 4,196
--------- -------- -------
$ 14,814 $ 14,960 $12,863
========= ======== =======
Discontinued operations:
Current......................................... $ (18,759) $ (6,801) $(2,689)
Deferred........................................ (90,869) (6,995) 147
--------- -------- -------
$(109,628) $(13,796) $(2,542)
========= ======== =======
</TABLE>
The provisions for income taxes applicable to continuing operations differ
from the statutory tax amounts as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
-------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Tax at statutory rates during the year................ $ 6,334 $14,588 $11,101
State income taxes, net............................... 459 387 1,512
Amortization of non-deductible goodwill............... 125 122 158
Valuation allowance for capital loss carryforwards.... 8,045 -- --
Other................................................. (149) (137) 92
------- ------- -------
$14,814 $14,960 $12,863
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The following table reconciles the income tax benefits applicable to
discontinued operations to the federal statutory tax amounts (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
----------------------------
1999 1998 1997
--------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected tax benefit at statutory rates during
the year........................................ $(118,002) $(13,638) $(2,690)
State income taxes, net.......................... (9,557) (305) (309)
Non-deductible goodwill.......................... 8,583 542 542
Valuation allowance for state net operating loss
carryforwards and capital loss carryforwards not
expected to be realized......................... 9,304 -- --
Other............................................ 44 (395) (85)
--------- -------- -------
$(109,628) $(13,796) $(2,542)
========= ======== =======
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The Company's federal net operating loss for fiscal 1999 was approximately
$60,000,000. Of this amount, $17,000,000 will be carried back to reduce taxes
payable for prior periods. The remaining $43,000,000 will be carried forward,
and may be used to reduce taxes due in future periods for up to 20 years. The
alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards in the preceding table may be
carried forward indefinitely. In addition, the Company has state net operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $73,000,000, the majority of which will
expire in 15 years.
Due primarily to the disallowance of a tax benefit related to capital loss
carryforwards created by the 1999 write off of the Company's investment in
Pacific Coast Recycling, the Company provided a valuation allowance in the tax
provision applicable to continuing operations in the amount of $8,045,000. In
addition, the Company provided a valuation allowance in the tax provision
applicable to discontinued operations in the amount of $9,304,000 related
primarily to state net operating loss carryforwards which will most likely
expire before being utilized, because upon the disposal of the SBQ operations,
the Company does not expect to have continuing operations in states where the
carryforwards reside.
10. Stock Compensation Plans
The Company has four stock compensation plans that provide for the granting
of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock to officers,
directors and employees. The exercise price of stock option awards issued under
these plans equals or exceeds the market price of the Company's common stock on
the date of grant. Stock options under these plans are exercisable one to five
years after the grant date, usually in annual installments. No stock
appreciation rights have been issued. In addition, the Company maintains a
stock accumulation plan, which provides for the purchase of restricted stock,
vesting in three years, to participants in lieu of a portion of their cash
compensation.
The status of the Company's stock compensation plans is summarized below as
of June 30, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total Number of Options or Shares
---------------------------------------
Available for Reserved for
Future Grant Issuance Under
Authorized or Purchase the Plan
---------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1986 Stock Option Plan.................. 900,000 -- 134,399
1990 Management Incentive Plan.......... 900,000 83,950 517,000
1995 Stock Accumulation Plan............ 500,000 341,960 158,040
1996 Director Stock Option Plan......... 100,000 64,000 36,000
1997 Management Incentive Plan.......... 900,000 29,439 870,561
</TABLE>
The Company records stock-based compensation under the provisions of
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25) and related Interpretations. An alternative method of
accounting exists under FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, which requires the use of option valuation models; however, these
models were not developed for use in valuing employee stock compensation
awards. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company's employee
stock options equals or exceeds the market price of the underlying stock on the
date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized for stock options. The
Company recognizes compensation expense on grants of restricted stock and stock
grants under the 1995 Stock Accumulation Plan based on the intrinsic value of
the stock on the date of grant amortized over the vesting period. Total
compensation expense recognized for stock-based employee compensation awards
was $541,000, $721,000 and $747,000 in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
As required by Statement 123, the Company has determined pro forma net income
and earnings per share as if it had accounted for its employee stock
compensation awards using the fair value method of that Statement.
45
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The fair value for these awards was estimated at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Risk free interest rate.............................. 5.76% 5.38% 6.25%
Dividend yield....................................... 2.48% 2.15% 1.96%
Volatility factor.................................... 60% 54% 75%
Weighted average expected life:
Stock options....................................... 5 years 5 years 5 years
Restricted stock awards............................. 4 years 4 years 4 years
</TABLE>
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are
fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility.
Because the Company's employee stock compensation awards have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in
the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate,
in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a
reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock compensation
awards.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the stock
compensation awards is amortized to expense over the appropriate vesting
period. The effect on results of operations and earnings per share is not
expected to be indicative of the effects on the results of operations and
earnings per share in future years. The pro forma calculations include stock
compensation awards granted beginning in fiscal 1996. The Company's pro forma
information follows (in thousands except for earnings per share information):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
--------------------------
1999 1998 1997
--------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pro forma:
Income from continuing operations.................. $ 2,815 $27,377 $18,745
Income per share from continuing operations........ 0.10 0.92 0.64
Net income (loss).................................. (224,705) 1,061 13,375
Net income (loss) per share........................ (7.62) 0.03 0.46
</TABLE>
A summary of the Company's stock option activity, and related information for
the years ended June 30 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
------------------- -------------------- -------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Number of Exercise Number of Exercise Number of Exercise
Options Price Options Price Options Price
--------- -------- --------- -------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding--beginning
of year................ 1,009,165 $16.89 851,876 $16.35 445,212 $15.42
Granted................. 964,000 5.95 258,000 18.50 543,000 16.70
Exercised............... -- -- (51,111) 9.45 (35,054) 8.85
Canceled................ (318,544) 14.23 (49,600) 16.70 (101,282) 16.62
--------- --------- --------
Outstanding--end of
year................... 1,654,621 10.99 1,009,165 16.89 851,876 16.35
========= ========= ========
Exercisable at end of
year................... 455,463 16.90 445,493 16.04 385,919 15.81
========= ========= ========
Weighted-average fair
value of options
granted during year.... $ 2.86 $ 8.28 $ 9.71
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Summary information about the Company's stock options outstanding at June 30,
1999 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
------------------------------ ---------------------
Weighted
Average Weighted Weighted
Contractual Average Average
Number of Period in Exercise Number of Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices Options Years Price Options Price
- ------------------------ --------- ----------- -------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$4.31--$5.25............. 706,000 9.49 $ 4.82 -- --
$9.08--$11.08............ 206,400 8.90 9.61 6,000 $ 9.08
$14.08--$20.00........... 739,721 5.78 17.18 446,963 16.92
$31.88................... 2,500 4.72 31.88 2,500 31.88
--------- ----------
$4.31--$31.88............ 1,654,621 7.75 10.99 455,463 16.90
========= ==========
</TABLE>
In addition to the stock option activity presented in the preceding table,
the Company granted 61,720, 7,550 and 24,500 shares of restricted stock in
1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The weighted average fair value of these
awards was $7.35 in 1999, $15.93 in 1998 and $16.41 in 1997. The Company also
issued 60,505, 30,187 and 25,989 shares in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively,
under the Stock Accumulation Plan.
11. Deferred Compensation and Employee Benefits
The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(K) plan that covers
substantially all non-union employees. The Company makes both discretionary and
matching contributions to the plan based on employee compensation and
contributions. Company contributions charged to continuing operations amounted
to $3,911,000, $2,911,000 and $2,272,000 in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997,
respectively. Discontinued operations includes charges of $866,000, $577,000
and $662,000 related to the plan for those same periods.
Certain officers and key employees participate in the Executive Retirement
and Compensation Deferral Plan (ERCDP), a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan which allows participants to defer specified percentages of base and bonus
pay, and provides for Company contributions. Under the new ERCDP agreements,
the Company recognizes compensation costs as contributions become vested.
Investment performance gains and losses on each participant's plan account
result in additional compensation costs to the Company. To fund its obligation
under this Plan, the Company has purchased life insurance policies on the
covered employees. The Company's obligations to participants in the Plan are
reported in deferred liabilities.
Other than the plans referred to above, the Company provides no
postretirement or postemployment benefits to its employees that would be
subject to the provisions of FASB Statements No. 106 or No. 112.
47
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
12. Business Acquisition
On November 15, 1996, the Company and Atlantic Steel Industries, Inc.
(Atlantic) formed Birmingham Southeast, LLC (Birmingham Southeast), a limited
liability company owned 85% by the Company and 15% by an affiliate of Atlantic.
Upon formation of Birmingham Southeast on December 2, 1996 the Company
contributed the assets of its Jackson, Mississippi facility to Birmingham
Southeast, and Birmingham Southeast purchased the operating assets of Atlantic
located in Cartersville, Georgia for $43,309,000 in cash and assumed
liabilities approximating $44,257,000. The purchase price of the Cartersville,
Georgia assets was allocated based on the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Current assets..................................................... $ 31,667
Property, plant and equipment...................................... 63,400
Other non-current assets, primarily goodwill....................... 9,964
--------
Total assets acquired............................................ 105,031
Fair value of liabilities assumed.................................. (44,257)
Minority interest.................................................. (17,465)
--------
Total purchase price............................................. $ 43,309
========
</TABLE>
13. Contingencies
Environmental
The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations concerning, among other matters, waste water effluents, air
emissions and furnace dust management and disposal. The Company believes that
it is currently in compliance with all known material and applicable
environmental regulations.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its
operations in the normal course of business. Such claims are generally covered
by various forms of insurance. In the opinion of management, any uninsured or
unindemnified liability resulting from existing litigation would not have a
material effect on the Company's business, its financial position, liquidity or
results of operations.
14. Other Income
In fiscal 1998, the Company sold idle properties and equipment for
approximately $26,900,000 and recognized (pre-tax) gains of approximately
$5,200,000. The Company also received $4,400,000 in refunds from electrode
suppliers in both 1999 and 1998 that related to electrodes purchased in prior
years. These amounts are included in "other income, net" from continuing
operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
48
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
15. Products and Geographic Areas
Net sales to external customers, by product type and geographic area were as
follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,
--------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Continuing Operations:
By Product Class:
Reinforcing bar................................... $386,421 $439,160 $387,683
Merchant products................................. 283,942 316,184 235,390
Semi-finished billets............................. 27,610 70,562 35,197
Strand, mesh, and other........................... 11,903 10,969 9,446
-------- -------- --------
$709,876 $836,875 $667,716
======== ======== ========
By Geographic Area
United States..................................... $672,034 $778,262 $619,401
Canada............................................ 37,440 57,961 47,958
All others........................................ 402 652 357
-------- -------- --------
$709,876 $836,875 $667,716
======== ======== ========
Discontinued Operations:
By Product Class:
High-quality rod, bar and wire.................... $267,116 $296,774 $309,655
High-quality semi-finished billets................ 1,955 -- --
Other............................................. 1,327 2,370 1,578
-------- -------- --------
$270,398 $299,114 $311,233
======== ======== ========
By Geographic Area
United States..................................... $266,310 $295,326 $308,680
Canada............................................ 4,088 3,818 2,553
-------- -------- --------
<CAPTION>
$270,398 $299,144 $311,233
<S> <C> <C> <C>
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
Substantially all of the Company's long-lived tangible assets are located in
the continental United States. Revenues in the preceding table are attributed
to countries based on the location of the customers. No single customer
accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net sales.
16. Shareholder Rights Plan
On January 16, 1996, the Company's Board of Directors adopted a shareholder
rights plan. Under the plan, Rights to purchase stock, at a rate of one Right
for each share of common stock held, were distributed to stockholders of record
on January 19, 1996. The Rights generally become exercisable after a person or
group (i) acquires 10% or more of the Company's outstanding common stock or
(ii) commences a tender offer that would result in such a person or group
owning 10% or more of the Company's common stock. When the Rights first become
exercisable, a holder will be entitled to buy from the Company a unit
consisting of one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock of the Company at a purchase price of $74. In the event that a
person acquires 10% or more of the Company's common stock, each Right not owned
by the 10% or more stockholder would become exercisable for common stock of the
Company having a market value equal to twice the exercise price of the Right.
Alternatively, after such stock acquisition, if the Company is acquired in a
merger or other business combination or 50% or more of its assets or earning
power are sold, each
49
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Right not owned by the 10% or more stockholder would become exercisable for
common stock of the party which has engaged in a transaction with the Company
having a market value equal to twice the exercise price of the Right. Prior to
the time that a person acquires 10% or more of the Company's common stock, the
Rights are redeemable by the Board of Directors at a price of $.01 per right.
The Rights expire on January 16, 2006, except as otherwise provided in the
plan.
50
<PAGE>
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 Quarters(1)
------------------------------------------
First Second Third Fourth
-------- -------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales.................... $207,502 $166,227 $152,180 $ 183,967
Gross profit................. $ 29,048 $ 23,324 $ 19,409 $ 29,180
Pre-operating/start-up costs. $ 1,363 $ 1,732 $ 5,837 $ 3,992
Income (loss) from continuing
operations.................. $ 10,926 $ 7,849 $ 1,887 $ (17,378)(3)
Loss from discontinued opera-
tions....................... $ (9,901) $(12,815) $(17,518) $(187,286)(2)
Net income (loss)............ $ 1,025 $ (4,966) $(15,631) $(204,664)(2)(3)
Weighted average shares out-
standing.................... 29,488 29,254 29,509 29,674
======== ======== ======== =========
Basic and diluted per share
amounts:
Income from continuing op-
erations.................. $ 0.37 $ 0.27 $ 0.06 $ (0.59)
Loss on discontinued opera-
tions..................... (0.34) (0.44) (0.59) (6.31)
-------- -------- -------- ---------
Basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share.......... $ 0.03 $ (0.17) $ (0.53) $ (6.90)
======== ======== ======== =========
Cash dividends declared per
share..................... $ 0.100 $ 0.025 $ 0.025 $ 0.025
======== ======== ======== =========
Net sales.................... $216,868 $200,320 $205,479 $ 214,208
Pre operating/start-up costs. $ 288 $ 122 $ 279 $ 616
Gross profit................. $ 28,299 $ 24,295 $ 26,693 $ 30,287
Income (loss) from continuing
operations.................. $ 9,299 $ 8,572 (4) $ 6,092 $ 3,982 (5)
Loss from discontinued opera-
tions....................... $ (2,054) $ (5,795) $(10,240) $ (8,227)
Net income (loss)............ $ 7,245 $ 2,777 (4) $ (4,148) $ (4,245)(5)
Weighted average shares out-
standing.................... 29,685 29,710 29,654 29,647
======== ======== ======== =========
Basic and diluted per share
amounts:
Income from continuing op-
erations.................. $ 0.31 $ 0.29 $ 0.21 $ 0.13
Loss on discontinued opera-
tions..................... (0.07) (0.20) (0.35) (0.27)
-------- -------- -------- ---------
Basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share.......... $ 0.24 $ 0.09 $ (0.14) $ (0.14)
======== ======== ======== =========
Cash dividends declared per
share..................... $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 0.10
======== ======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) The operating results of the SBQ line of business for fiscal 1999 and all
prior periods presented herein have been restated and reported in
discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(2) Reflects $173,183 loss on disposal of SBQ line of business, including
estimated losses during the disposal period (net of income tax benefit of
$78,704). See Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3) Includes provision for loss of $19,275,000 on the Company's investment in
Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC.
(4) Includes $3,368 of pre-tax gains on sales of idle facilities and equipment.
(5) Includes the effect of (a) impairment loss on the investment in Laclede
Steel Company--$12,383; (b) gain on sale of idle facility in Ballard,
Washington--$1,857; and (c) settlements received from electrode suppliers--
$4,414.
51
<PAGE>
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Birmingham Steel Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Birmingham
Steel Corporation as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1999. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 14 (a) 2.
These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits. The 1999 and 1998 financial
statements of Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC (a 50% owned joint venture), have
been audited by other auditors whose report, which has been furnished to us,
included an explanatory paragraph describing an uncertainty regarding the
ability of Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC to continue as a going concern. Our
opinion on the 1999 and 1998 consolidated financial statements and schedule,
insofar as it relates to data included for Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC, is
based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other
auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and, for 1999 and 1998, the report of
other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Birmingham Steel Corporation at June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended June 30, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
September 15, 1999,
except for Note 7, as to
which the date is October 12, 1999
52
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Members
Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC:
We have audited the balance sheets of Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC as of June
30, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of operations, members' capital
(deficit) and cash flows for the years ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Pacific Coast Recycling, LLC
as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
The financial statements have been prepared assuming that Pacific Coast
Recycling, LLC will continue as a going concern. As discussed in note 3 to the
financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations, has a net capital deficiency and as of June 30, 1999, the members
have stated that they will no longer provide letters confirming their
continuing financial support of the Company. These parent companies provide a
significant amount of the operations of the Company as described in note 9 to
the financial statements. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the
entity's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, CA
July 30, 1999
53
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information contained in Birmingham Steel Corporation's 1999 Proxy
Statement, with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company, is
incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information contained in Birmingham Steel Corporation's 1999 Proxy
Statement, with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company, is
incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information contained in Birmingham Steel Corporation's 1999 Proxy
Statement, with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company is
incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Not applicable.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
ITEM 14 (a) 1. INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS COVERED BY REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The following consolidated financial statements of Birmingham Steel
Corporation are included in Item 8:
Consolidated Balance Sheets--June 30, 1999 and 1998
Consolidated Statements of Operations--Years ended June 30, 1999, 1998
and 1997
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity--Years ended
June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows--Years ended June 30, 1999, 1998
and 1997
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
Independent Auditors Report (KPMG LLP)
ITEM 14 (a) 2. INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following consolidated financial statement schedule is included in item
14 (d) of this report.
Form 10-K
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Schedules Description
--------- -----------
<C> <S>
II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
</TABLE>
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because they are not
required or are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the
Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto. Columns omitted from
schedules filed have been omitted because the information is not applicable.
54
<PAGE>
ITEM 14 (a) 3. EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index below are filed or incorporated by
reference as part of this report and such Exhibit Index is hereby incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 14 (b). REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter ended June 30,
1999.
ITEM 14 (c) EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Description of Exhibits
------- -----------------------
<C> <S>
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated
by reference from Form 8-A, Exhibit 2.2, filed November 16, 1986)
3.2 By-laws of the Registrant as amended on August 3, 1999 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 from Current Report on Form 8-K filed
August 11, 1999)
4.1 Birmingham Steel Corporation $130,000,000 Senior Note Purchase
Agreement dated December 15, 1993 between the Registrant and the
following group of investors: The Equitable Life Assurance Society of
the U.S., The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Principal
Mutual Life Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company,
Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance Company, Phoenix Home Life Mutual Life
Insurance Company, American United Life Insurance Company, Canada Life
Assurance Company, Canada Life Assurance Company of America, Canada
Life Assurance Company of New York, Ameritas Life Insurance
Corporation, Berkshire Life Insurance Company, Provident Mutual Life
Insurance Company-CALIC, Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of
Philadelphia (incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for quarter
ended December 31, 1993, Exhibit 4.1)
4.1.1 First Amendment to $130,000,000 Senior Note Purchase Agreement dated
October 18, 1996 (to be filed by amendment to this Form 10-K)
4.1.2 Second Amendment to $130,000,000 Senior Note Purchase Agreement dated
December 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 from Form
10-Q for quarter ended December 31, 1998)
4.1.3 Waiver and Third Amendment to $130,000,000 Senior Note Purchase
Agreement dated as of October 12, 1999 (to be filed by amendment to
this Form 10-K)
4.1.4 Amended and Restated $130,000,000 Senior Note Purchase Agreement dated
as of October 12, 1999 (to be filed by amendment to this Form 10-K)
4.2 Birmingham Steel Corporation $150,000,000 Senior Note Purchase
Agreement dated December 15, 1995 between the Registrant and the
following group of investors: Connecticut General Life Insurance
Company, Life Insurance Company of North America, CIGNA Property and
Casualty Insurance Company, Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company,
Nationwide Life Insurance Company, Employers Life Insurance Company of
Wausau, The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, The Equitable
Life Assurance Society of the United States, Sun Life Assurance
Company of Canada (U.S.), Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Sun
Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York, The Minnesota Mutual
Life Insurance Company, Mutual Trust Life Insurance Company, The
Reliable Life Insurance Company, Federated Mutual Insurance Company,
Federated Life Insurance Company, Minnesota Fire and Casualty Company,
National Travelers Life Company, First National Life Insurance Company
of America, Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Company, First Colony
Life Insurance Company, American United Life Insurance Company, The
State Life Insurance Company, Ameritas Life Insurance Company
(incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for quarter ended December
31, 1995, Exhibit 4.1).
</TABLE>
55
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Description of Exhibits
------- -----------------------
<C> <S>
4.2.1 Amendment to $150,000,000 Senior Note Purchase Agreement dated
December 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 from Form
10-Q for quarter ended December 31, 1998)
4.2.2 Waiver and Second Amendment to $150,000,000 Senior Note Purchase
Agreement dated as of October 12, 1999 (to be filed by amendment to
this Form 10-K)
4.2.3 Amended and Restated $150,000,000 Senior Note Purchase Agreement dated
as of October 12, 1999 (to be filed by amendment to this Form 10-K)
4.3 Letter from Birmingham Steel Corporation to Senior Noteholders dated
October 13, 1999 (to be filed by amendment to this Form 10-K)*
4.4 Shareholder Rights Plan of Registrant (incorporated by reference from
Form 8-K filed January 23, 1996)
4.5 Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1996, between
Birmingham Steel Corporation and PNC Bank, Kentucky, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for quarter ended December
31, 1996, exhibit 4.1)
10.1 1986 Stock Option Plan of Registrant, as amended (incorporated by
reference from Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-16648),
filed August 20, 1987)**
10.2 Amended and Restated Management Security Plan, effective January 1,
1994 (incorporated by reference from Form 10-K for year ended June 30,
1994, Exhibit 10.2)**
10.3 Steel Billet Sale and Purchase Master Agreement between American Steel
& Wire Corporation and QIT-Fer et Titane, Inc. dated July 1, 1994
(incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended June 30, 1995, Exhibit 10.3)
10.4 Supply Agreement, dated as of August 2, 1985, among MC Acquisition
Corp., Birmingham Bolt Company, Inc., Magna Corporation, Contractors
Material Co., Inc., and Hackney Steel Co., Inc. (incorporated by
reference from Registrant Statement No. 33-945, Exhibit 10.6.3, filed
November 20, 1985)
10.5 1989 Non-Union Employees' Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference from a Registration Statement on Form S-8,
Registration No. 33-30848, filed August 31, 1989, Exhibit 4.1)**
10.6 Restated Birmingham Steel Corporation 401(k) Plan restated as of
January 1, 1990 (incorporated by reference from Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8, Registration No. 33-23563, filed July 12,
1990, Exhibit 4.1)**
10.7 Special Severance Benefits Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended June
30, 1989, Exhibit 10.12)**
10.8 Lease Agreement, as amended, dated July 13, 1993 between Torchmark
Development Corporation and Birmingham Steel Corporation (incorporated
by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30,
1993, Exhibit 10.12)
10.8.1 Third Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated November 30, 1993, between
Torchmark Development Corporation and Birmingham Steel Corporation
(incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 10.8.1)
10.8.2 Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated June 13, 1994, between
Torchmark Development Corporation and Birmingham Steel Corporation
(incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 10.8.2)
10.8.3 Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated September 6, 1995, between
Torchmark Development Corporation and Birmingham Steel Corporation
(incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 10.8.3)
</TABLE>
56
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Description of Exhibits
------- -----------------------
<C> <S>
10.8.4 Sixth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated April 11, 1997, between
Torchmark Development Corporation and Birmingham Steel Corporation
(incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 10.8.4)
10.8.5 Seventh Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated April 11, 1997, between
Torchmark Development Corporation and Birmingham Steel Corporation
(incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 10.8.5)
10.8.6 Eighth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated April 11, 1997, between
Torchmark Development Corporation and Birmingham Steel Corporation
(incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended June 30, 1998, Exhibit 10.8.6)
10.9 1990 Management Incentive Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference from a Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No.
33-41595, filed July 5, 1991, Exhibit 4.1)**
10.10 1992 Non-Union Employees' Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference from a Registration Statement on Form S-8,
Registration No. 33-51080, filed August 21, 1992, Exhibit 4.1)**
10.11 Employment Agreement, dated January 5, 1996 between Registrant and
Robert A. Garvey (incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for quarter
ended December 31, 1995 exhibit 10.1)**
10.11.1 Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 5, 1996 between
Registrant and Robert A. Garvey dated August 10, 1998 (incorporated by
reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 1998
Exhibit 10.11.1)**
10.11.2 Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 5, 1996
between Registrant and Robert A. Garvey dated September 20, 1999 *, **
10.12 Employment Agreement, dated May 11, 1999, between Registrant and Brian
F. Hill*, **
10.12.1 Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 21, 1999, between
Registrant and Brian F. Hill*, **
10.13 Employment Agreement, dated September 20, 1999, between Registrant and
Kevin E. Walsh*, **
10.15 Stock Accumulation Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by reference
from a Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 33-64069,
filed November 8, 1995, Exhibit 4.1)**
10.16 Lease Agreement, dated January 7, 1997, between Torchmark Development
Corporation and Birmingham Southeast LLC (incorporated by reference
from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 1998, Exhibit
10.13)
10.174 Director Stock Option Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference from Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 1996, exhibit
10.1)**
10.18 Director Compensation Plan of the Registrant (to be filed by amendment
to this Form 10-K)**
10.19 Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan of the Registrant*, **
10.20 Chief Executive Officer Incentive Compensation Plan of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for quarter ended September
30, 1996, exhibit 10.2)**
10.21 Equity Contribution Agreement among American Iron Reduction, L.L.C.,GS
Technologies Operating Co., Inc., Birmingham Steel Corporation and
Nationsbank, N.A., dated August 30, 1996 (incorporated by reference
from Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 1996, exhibit 10.3)
10.22 DRI Purchase Agreement between Birmingham Steel Corporation and
American Iron Reduction, L.L.C., dated as of August 30, 1996
(incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for quarter ended September
30, 1996, exhibit 10.4)
</TABLE>
57
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Description of Exhibits
------- -----------------------
<C> <S>
10.23 Operating Agreement between Birmingham Steel Corporation and Raw
Material Development Co., Ltd., dated as of September 18, 1996
(incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for quarter ended September
30, 1996, exhibit 10.5)
10.24 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 31, 1996, among Mitsui &
Co., Ltd., R. Todd Neilson, as Chapter 11 Trustee for the bankruptcy
estate of Hiuka America Corporation, All-Ways Recycling Company, B&D
Auto & Truck Salvage, and Weiner Steel Corporation (incorporated by
reference from Form 10-Q for quarter ended December 31, 1996, exhibit
10.1)
10.25 Contribution Agreement, dated as of November 15, 1996, among IVACO,
Inc., Atlantic Steel Industries, Inc., Birmingham Steel Corporation
and Birmingham Southeast, LLC (incorporated by reference from Current
report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 1996)
10.26 $300 million Credit Agreement, dated as of March 17, 1997 by and among
Birmingham Steel Corporation, as Borrower, the financial institutions
party hereto and their assignees under section 12.5.(d), as Lenders,
PNC Bank, National Association and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Co-
agents and Nationsbank, N.A. (South), as Agent and as Arranger
(incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31,
1997, exhibit 10.1)
10.26.1 First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated June 23, 1998 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 from Current Report on Form 8-K filed
September 30, 1999)
10.26.2 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated September 30, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from Form 10-Q for quarter
ended December 31, 1998)
10.26.3 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 27, 1999 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 from Current Report on Form 8-K filed
September 30, 1999)
10.26.4 Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated September 28, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 from Current Report on Form
8-K filed September 30, 1999)
10.26.5 Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated October 12, 1999 (to be
filed by amendment to this Form 10-K)
10.26.6 Collateral Agency and Intercreditor Agreement dated October 12, 1999
(to be filed by amendment to this Form 10-K)
10.27 Executive Retirement and Compensation Deferral Plan of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended June 30, 1998, Exhibit 10.22)**
10.28 1997 Management Incentive Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference from a Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No.
333-46771, filed February 24, 1998, Exhibit 4.6).**
22.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant*
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors*
23.2 Accountants' Consent (KPMG LLP)*
27 Financial Data Schedule*
99.1 Risk Factors that May Affect Future Operating Results*
</TABLE>
- --------
* Being filed herewith
** Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an exhibit to this report.
ITEM 14 (d) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The list of financial statements and schedules referred to in Items 14(a)(1)
and 14(a)(2) is incorporated herein by reference.
58
<PAGE>
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance Charged
at to Costs Balance
Beginning and at End
of Year Expenses Deductions of Year
--------- -------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended June 30, 1999:
Deducted from assets accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts..... $1,838 $ 367 $ 998 $ 1,207
Provision for estimated losses for
SBQ division during disposal peri-
od................................. -- 56,544 -- 56,544
Provision for estimated loss on dis-
posal of discontinued operations... -- 195,342 -- 195,342
------ -------- ------ --------
$1,838 $252,643 $ 126 $253,093
====== ======== ====== ========
Year Ended June 30, 1998:
Deducted from assets accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts..... $1,797 $ 1,250 $1,209 $ 1,838
------ -------- ------ --------
$1,797 $ 1,250 $1,209 $ 1,838
====== ======== ====== ========
Year Ended June 30, 1997:
Deducted from assets accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts..... $1,554 $ 543 $ 300 $ 1,797
------ -------- ------ --------
$1,554 $ 543 $ 300 $ 1,797
====== ======== ====== ========
</TABLE>
59
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the Undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION
/s/ Robert A. Garvey
By: _________________________________
Robert A. Garvey
Chairman of the Board
October 13, 1999
Date: _______________________________
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ E. Mandell de Windt Chairman--Executive October 13, 1999
_________________________________ Committee
E. Mandell de Windt Director
/s/ Robert A. Garvey Chairman of the Board, Chief October 13, 1999
_________________________________ Executive Officer, Director
Robert A. Garvey (Principal Executive
Officer)
/s/ Robert D. Kennedy Director October 13, 1999
_________________________________
Robert D. Kennedy
/s/ C. Stephen Clegg Director October 13, 1999
_________________________________
C. Stephen Clegg
/s/ John H. Roberts Director October 13, 1999
_________________________________
John H. Roberts
/s/ E. Bradley Jones Director October 13, 1999
_________________________________
E. Bradley Jones
/s/ William J. Cabaniss, Jr. Director October 13, 1999
_________________________________
William J. Cabaniss, Jr.
/s/ Richard de J. Osborne Director October 13, 1999
_________________________________
Richard de J. Osborne
/s/ Alfred C. DeCrane, Jr. Director October 13, 1999
_________________________________
Alfred C. DeCrane, Jr.
/s/ Kevin E. Walsh Executive Vice President-- October 13, 1999
_________________________________ Finance Chief Financial
Kevin E. Walsh Officer
(Principal Financial
Officer and Accounting
Officer)
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1
RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
Certain statements contained in our public filings, press releases and other
documents and materials as well as certain statements in written or oral
statements made by us or on our behalf are forward-looking statements based on
our current expectations and projections about future events, including:
market conditions; future financial performance and potential growth; effect
of indebtedness including restrictive covenants and asset pledges; future cash
sources and requirements, including expected capital expenditures; competition
and production costs; strategic plans, including estimated proceeds from and
the timing of asset sales, including the sale of the SBQ division; potential
acquisitions; environmental matters and liabilities; possible equipment
losses; Year 2000 issues; labor relations; and other matters. These forward-
looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties,
including those discussed below, which could cause our actual results to
differ materially from historical results or those anticipated and certain of
which are beyond our control.
The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate" and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this
document are based upon information available to the Company on the date
hereof, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. It is important to note that the Company's actual results
could differ materially from those described or implied in such forward-
looking statements. Moreover, new risk factors emerge from time to time and it
is not possible for the Company to predict all such risk factors, nor can the
Company assess the impact of all such risk factors on its business or the
extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual
results to differ materially from those described or implied in any forward-
looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual
results. The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this
report may describe additional factors that could adversely impact the
Company's business and financial performance.
Investors should also be aware that while the Company does, from time to
time, communicate with securities analysts, it is against our policy to
disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential
commercial information. Accordingly, investors should not assume that the
Company agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective
of the content of the statement or report. Furthermore, the Company has a
policy against issuing or confirming financial forecasts or projections issued
by others. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts
contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not the
Company's responsibility.
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are
the factors detailed below. In addition, readers should consider the risk
factors described from time to time in other Company reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Weak Market Conditions; High Imports
The Company operates in the steel industry, an industry that is vulnerable
to unpredictable economic cycles. A downturn in the economy or in the
Company's markets could have an adverse effect on the Company's performance.
The Company produces some products which are subject to competition from
foreign imports. Fluctuations in exchange rates or a decline in foreign
economic conditions may adversely affect the Company's performance.
Beginning in fiscal 1998, an economic downturn in Asia led to an excess
worldwide supply of steel products. Although demand for steel products in the
United States is strong, excess worldwide supply has created precarious
conditions in the U.S. steel industry, particularly with respect to price and
volumes. The Company's results are currently being impacted by disturbed
economic conditions in other countries creating a dramatic increase in steel
imports in the U.S. Until such time as the U.S. government intervenes with
trade sanctions or the foreign economic situation improves, the Company's
performance will continue to be adversely impacted by the import situation.
<PAGE>
The Company seeks to spread its sales across the reinforcing bar and
merchant product markets to reduce the Company's vulnerability to an economic
downturn in any one product market. The Company's performance, however, can
still be materially affected by changes in demand for any one of its product
lines and by changes in the economic condition of certain key industries such
as construction and manufacturing. In the past, the Company has sought
additional product and market diversification with its SBQ products. In August
1999, the Company announced a strategic restructuring as part of which it
plans to divest its SBQ operations in order to focus on its core mini-mill and
scrap operations. Divestiture of the SBQ operations will eliminate some
product and market diversification, leaving the Company with increased
exposure to fluctuations in the rebar and merchant product markets.
Effect of Substantial Indebtedness on Operations and Liquidity
The Company has a significant amount of indebtedness. At June 30, 1999, the
Company's consolidated indebtedness (excluding unused commitments) was $522
million, and it had additional borrowing capacity of approximately $129
million. The Company's ability to comply with the terms of its credit
agreement and its other debt obligations, to make cash payments with respect
to the Company's debt obligations and to refinance any of such debt
obligations will depend on the Company's future performance. The Company's
future performance is subject to prevailing economic and competitive
conditions and certain financial, business and other factors beyond the
Company's control. Having a high degree of leverage has significant
consequences for the Company. For instance, high leverage might impair the
Company's ability to obtain additional financing for acquisitions, capital
expenditures, working capital or general corporate purposes. In addition, a
substantial portion of the Company's cash flow from operations is used to pay
principal and interest on the Company's borrowings. This use of cash flows
reduces the funds available for the Company's operations and other purposes,
including capital spending. Some of the Company's borrowings are and will
continue to be at variable rates of interest, which creates exposure to the
risk of increased interest rates. Finally, the Company may be substantially
more leveraged than some of its competitors. This may place the Company at a
relative competitive disadvantage and may make it more vulnerable to a
downturn in general economic conditions, a slowdown in the Company's business
or changing market conditions and regulations.
Restrictive Covenants; Pledge of Assets
The terms of the Company's credit agreement and agreements with the Senior
Noteholders require the Company to satisfy certain financial tests and to
comply with certain other restrictive covenants. Covenants in the Company's
debt obligations restrict the Company's ability to incur additional
indebtedness, dispose of certain assets and make capital expenditures. The
covenants also restrict the Company's other corporate activities. The
Company's ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events
beyond the Company's control, including economic, financial and industry
conditions. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to satisfy
or comply with the financial tests and covenants contained in such agreements.
Failure to do so may result in a default under the Company's credit
arrangements. If any such default were not remedied within the applicable
grace period, if any, the lenders under such agreements would be entitled to
declare the amounts outstanding thereunder due and payable. In addition, the
Company's obligations under the credit agreement and agreements with the
Senior Noteholders are secured by substantially all of the assets of the
Company and its subsidiaries. Accordingly, if an event of default were to
occur, the banks and Senior Noteholders could have a priority claim on
substantially all of the assets of the Company.
Need to Refinance Indebtedness
Based upon the current level of the Company's operations and current
industry conditions, the Company anticipates that it will have sufficient
resources to make all required interest and principal payments under the
credit agreement and Senior Notes through December 15, 2001. However, the
Company is required to make significant principal repayments on December 15,
2002 and may be required to refinance its obligations under the credit
agreement and Senior Notes prior to such time. There can be no assurance that
any such refinancing would be possible at such time, or if possible, that
acceptable terms could be obtained.
In the event of a refinancing of the Senior Notes or a required partial
prepayment thereof as a result of the sale of the SBQ division, the Company is
required to pay the Senior Noteholders an additional "make whole"
<PAGE>
payment intended to compensate the Senior Noteholders for any losses on
reinvestment of proceeds incurred by them as a result of the prepayment.
Effect of Change in Control
Under the Company's debt agreements, a change in a majority of the Company's
Board of Directors as a result of a contested proxy solicitation, as is being
waged by The United Group, could give rise, among other things, to the Exhibit
99.1 acceleration of the Company's debt obligations and may, as a result, have
a material adverse effect on the Company, its financial condition and its
operations. There can be no assurance that the majority of the Company's Board
of Directors will not change as a result of the contested proxy solicitation.
In the event of such a change in control, the Company would be required to
make an offer to prepay its Senior Notes which, if accepted, would obligate
the Company to pay 100% of their face amount ($280 million), plus accrued but
unpaid interest, together with a make-whole amount of approximately $9.1
million. Under the terms of the Company's Revolving Credit Agreement, such a
change in control would constitute an event of default, pursuant to which the
lenders may declare the full amount of the outstanding principal and interest
to be immediately due and payable. As of September 30, 1999, the Company had
approximately $217 million in borrowings outstanding under its credit
agreement.
In the event of such a change in control, the Company would be required to
obtain the forbearance or waiver of its noteholders and lenders or, in the
alternative, refinance its debt obligations. There can be no assurance that
the Company would be able to obtain such forbearances or waivers or to
refinance its debt obligations at such time and on acceptable terms.
In addition, a change in a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company
may trigger the vesting of certain rights and benefits of certain officers and
employees of the Company and thereby cause the Company to incur compensation
expenses and other obligations which, prior to such time, may have only been
contingent and otherwise unvested obligations. Currently, management estimates
a change in control may trigger such expenses and obligations amounting to
approximately $15.5 million.
Highly Competitive Markets; Production Costs
The Company's markets are highly competitive, and are also fragmented both
geographically and by product. As a result, the Company faces numerous
regional or specialized competitors, many of which are well established in
their markets. In addition, some of the Company's competitors are divisions of
larger companies with potentially greater financial and other resources than
the Company's own. Taken together, the competitive forces present in the
Company's markets can impair its operating margins.
The cost of scrap is the largest element in the cost of the Company's
finished rebar and merchant products. The Company purchases most of its scrap
on a short-term basis. Changes in the price of scrap can significantly affect
the Company's profitability. Changes in other raw material prices can also
influence the Company's profitability.
Energy costs are also a significant factor influencing the Company's
results. Current reforms in the electric utility industry at the state and
federal level are expected to lower energy costs in the long run. However,
numerous utilities and political groups are contesting these reforms and
states are approaching the reforms in different fashions. The possibility
exists, therefore, that the Company could be exposed to energy costs which are
less favorable than those available to its competitors. Such a situation could
materially affect the Company's performance. Further, the partial deregulation
of certain energy markets now in effect may lead to significant price
increases that would adversely affect the Company's performance.
Prices for some of the Company's products are positively affected by the
influence of trade sanctions or restrictions imposed on the Company's foreign
competitors. Changes in these sanctions or restrictions or their enforcement
could adversely affect the Company's results.
<PAGE>
SBQ Operations
Because of a number of factors primarily related to management and workforce
turnover and equipment design issues, the Company's SBQ melt shop in Memphis,
Tennessee has operated at less than a commercially viable production level.
Failure to sustain a commercially viable production run rate, continued delays
or other start-up issues in this project could materially adversely affect the
Company's future results. While in start-up operations, the melt shop may
experience "learning curve" and other problems which may adversely affect the
Company's financial performance. The Company is in the process of divesting
its SBQ operations. However, the SBQ operations have not been profitable and
delays in divestiture may cause the Company to suffer greater than expected
losses or costs associated with the discontinued SBQ operations.
Until the Memphis melt shop begins producing at acceptable levels and costs,
the Company's SBQ division will continue to purchase some of its steel billets
from third parties. The cost of these steel billets is a significant portion
of the cost of the SBQ division's finished products. Thus, the performance of
this division, and in turn, the performance of the Company, can be materially
affected by changes in the price of the steel billets it buys from third
parties.
Additional Risks Relating to Divestiture of SBQ Division
Under the credit agreement and agreement with the Senior Noteholders, the
Company will incur a 100 basis point interest rate increase with respect to
its indebtedness if the SBQ division is not sold by January 31, 2001. Such
interest rate penalty would be reduced to 50 basis points if the SBQ division
were sold subsequent to such date.
In addition, the Company will be obligated to repay indebtedness with the
proceeds of the sale of the SBQ division. Also, the sale of the SBQ division
under certain circumstances is subject to the approval of the banks under the
credit agreement and the Senior Noteholders.
As reflected in the charge taken by the Company in connection with its
decision to divest the SBQ division, the Company expects to receive sales
proceeds from the disposition of such assets equal to less than the historical
book value of the assets. There can be no assurance that the ultimate sales
price will not result in additional charges to earnings. The proceeds expected
to be realized on the sale of the SBQ operations are based on management's
estimates of the most likely outcome, considering, among other things,
informal appraisals from the Company's investment bankers and the Company's
knowledge of valuations for steel production assets. The expected operating
losses during the disposal period are based upon the Company's business plan
for the SBQ operations. However, the actual amounts ultimately realized on
sale and losses incurred during the expected disposal period could differ
materially from the amounts assumed in arriving at the losses reflected in the
1999 financial statements. Among other things, the reserve for operating
losses during the expected disposal period assumes that the Company will
continue to operate the SBQ facilities through the disposal date and that
during that period, production and shipment volumes will improve marginally
over fiscal 1999 levels. If the Company decides to curtail or cease operations
before the facilities are sold, actual losses could be materially different
from those provided in the financial statements. In addition, while management
believes that the estimated proceeds from the sale of the SBQ operations is a
reasonable estimate of the enterprise value, there can be no assurance that
such amounts will be realized. To the extent that actual proceeds or operating
losses during the expected disposal period differ from the estimates that are
reflected in the 1999 financial statements, the variance will be reported in
discontinued operations in future periods.
Risks Relating to Future Acquisitions; Start-up Expenses
The Company is constantly engaged in the process of evaluating new
opportunities to strengthen its long-term business and financial prospects.
From time to time, this process may lead the Company to make strategic
investments, such as acquisitions and joint ventures, which have the potential
to improve the Company's position in the markets in which it currently
competes, as well as new markets it may choose to enter. In connection with
these investments, the Company may incur, either directly or indirectly,
start-up expenses, losses and other
<PAGE>
charges that may have a material affect on the Company's financial
performance. Moreover, acquisitions involve numerous other risks, including
difficulties in assimilating acquired assets or operations, diversion of
management's attention from other business concerns and departure of key
employees or customers of acquired businesses.
There is no assurance the Company can successfully identify acquisitions in
the future, and even if the Company can identify acquisition opportunities,
completing such acquisitions may result in new issuances of the Company's
stock that may be dilutive to current owners; increases in the Company's debt
and contingent liabilities; and additional amortization expenses related to
goodwill and other intangible assets. Any of these risks could materially
adversely affect the Company's profitability. Moreover, even if acquisitions
are successfully completed and integrated, there is no assurance that such
acquisitions will have a positive impact on the Company's business or
operating results.
The Company began start-up operations of a new mid section rolling mill at
its Cartersville facility in March 1999. Results in fiscal 1999 reflect pre-
operating and start-up losses associated with this project, and fiscal year
2000 results will continue to reflect such losses. Unexpected increases in the
amount of pre-operating and start-up losses could negatively impact the
Company's financial performance.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its
operations in the normal course of business. Most of the existing known claims
against the Company are covered by insurance, subject to the payment of
deductible amounts by the Company. Management believes that any uninsured or
unindemnified liability resulting from existing litigation will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business or financial position.
However, there can be no assurance that insurance, including product liability
insurance, will be available in the future at reasonable rates.
Environmental Matters and Liabilities
The Company operates in an industry subject to numerous environmental
regulations, including regulations relating to air emissions, wastewater
discharges and the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes.
Changes in environmental regulations or in the interpretation or manner of
enforcement of environmental regulations could materially affect the Company's
performance. The Company is not currently planning or performing any
environmental remediations. However, some of the Company's facilities have
been in operation for many years and if the need to perform an environmental
remediation should arise, costs could be substantial. Depending upon the
nature and location of the problem, insurance coverage may or may not cover
some or all of the costs associated with the remediation.
Destruction or Loss of Equipment
The Company's economic performance, like most manufacturing companies, is
vulnerable to a catastrophe that disables one or more of its manufacturing
facilities and to major equipment failure. Depending upon the nature of the
catastrophe or equipment failure, available insurance may or may not cover a
loss resulting from such a catastrophe or equipment failure and the loss
resulting from such a catastrophe or equipment failure could materially affect
the Company's earnings.
Other Matters
Under the terms of the Company's amended debt agreements (See Note 7 to
Consolidated Financial Statements), dividends and other "restricted payments,"
as defined in the agreements, are limited to the lesser of $750,000 per
quarter or 50% of quarterly income from continuing operations through March
2002. The Company does not expect to change its present rate of quarterly
dividend payments ($.025 per share) in the near term.
Year 2000 Issue
The Company is nearing completion of its Y2K compliance project and
management of the Company believes it has an effective program in place to
resolve the few remaining year 2000 issues in a timely manner.
<PAGE>
In the event that the Company does not complete the remaining tasks, the
Company could experience problems that could result in the temporary
interruption of production at some of the steel making facilities. In
addition, disruptions in the economy generally resulting from Year 2000 issues
could also materially adversely affect the Company. The Company could be
subject to litigation for computer systems product failure, for example,
failure to properly date business records. The amount of the potential
liability and lost revenue cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
These risk factors include the inability of the Company to complete the
plans and modification that it has identified, the failure of software vendors
to deliver the upgrades and repairs to which they have committed, the wide
variety of information technology systems and components, both hardware and
software, that must be evaluated and the large number of vendors and customers
with which the Company interacts. The Company's assessment of the effects of
Year 2000 on the Company are based, in part, upon information received from
third parties upon which the Company reasonably relied must be considered as a
risk factor that might affect the Company's Year 2000 efforts. The Company is
attempting to reduce the risks by utilizing an organized approach, extensive
testing, and allowance of ample contingency time to address issues identified
by tests.
Labor Relations
The Company believes its labor relations are generally good. Almost the
entire work force is non-union and the Company has never suffered a strike or
other labor related work stoppage. If this situation changes, the Company's
performance could suffer material adverse effects.
Obligation to AIR
In fiscal 1997, the Company and Georgetown Industries, Inc. (GII) formed
American Iron Reduction, LLC, (AIR) located in Convent, Louisiana. The joint
venture produces direct reduced iron (DRI), which is used as a substitute for
high grade scrap. Construction of the DRI facility was funded by a $176.9
million non-recourse project financing arrangement, proceeds from a $8 million
industrial revenue bond and initial equity investments of $20 million by the
venture partners in fiscal 1998. Although the project is financed on a non-
recourse basis, both the Company and GII have agreed to purchase AIR's DRI
production during the term of the project financing. Pursuant to the DRI
purchase commitment, the Company has agreed to purchase one-half of the output
from the facility each year, if tendered (up to 600,000 metric tons per year).
In addition during the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, AIR defaulted on $178.9
million of long-term project finance debt. The Company, AIR and the other
venture partner are currently involved in discussions with AIR's lenders that
could affect the timing or amount of AIR's debt service requirements over the
remaining term of the debt agreements, as well as the Company's obligations to
AIR.
Although the Company intends to dispose of its interest in AIR as a part of
its overall plan of disposal for the SBQ division, the Company could remain
obligated to purchase DRI from AIR beyond the disposal date. If the Company is
unable to find a buyer to assume its obligations under the AIR purchase
agreement and future market prices for DRI are less than the price the Company
is obligated to pay, the Company will incur losses on future merchant DRI
activities. On the other hand, if the market price of DRI increases to an
amount that exceeds the price payable under the AIR agreements, the Company
could generate future profits from merchant DRI activities. Such losses or
profits will be reflected in continuing operations in future periods until
such time as the Company is no longer obligated under the AIR purchase
commitment. Currently, the market price of DRI is approximately $30 per ton
less than the price the Company is required to pay under the AIR purchase
commitment. Assuming the Company continues to purchase DRI from AIR at its
current level of approximately 300,000 metric tons per year and no change in
the market price of DRI, the Company will absorb approximately $9 million per
year in excess DRI costs. The Company is unable to predict whether, or how
long, this situation will continue and thus is unable to predict the amount of
future losses that may be incurred under the AIR purchase agreement.
In addition, pursuant to the agreements recently entered into with the
Senior Noteholders, the Company is generally restricted from making payments
to AIR in excess of the amounts presently required under its agreements
relating to AIR and may be required, subject to certain exceptions set forth
in the agreements with its Senior Noteholders, to obtain the approval of its
Senior Noteholders to enter into an agreement to terminate or settle any of
its obligations relating to AIR.
<PAGE>
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Board of Directors
Robert A. Garvey
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Birmingham Steel Corporation
E. Mandell de Windt
Chairman of the Executive Committee
Birmingham Steel Corporation
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Eaton Corporation
William J. Cabaniss, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Precision Grinding, Inc.
C. Stephen Clegg
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Diamond Home Services, Inc.
Midwest Spring Manufacturing Company
Alfred C. DeCrane, Jr.
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Texaco, Inc.
E. Bradley Jones
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
LTV Steel Company
Robert D. Kennedy
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Union Carbide Corporation
Richard de J. Osborne
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ASARCO Incorporated
John H. Roberts
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
J. H. Roberts Industries
Corporate Officers
Robert A. Garvey
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Brian F. Hill
Chief Operating Officer
Kevin E. Walsh
Executive Vice President-Chief Financial Officer
Raymond J. Lepp
Managing Director-Western Region
William R. Lucas, Jr.
Managing Director-Southern Region
Jack R. Wheeler
Managing Director-Northern Region
J. Daniel Garrett
Vice President-Finance and Control
Catherine W. Pecher
Vice President-Administration and Corporate Secretary
Corporate Officers (Continued)
Philip L. Oakes
Vice President-Human Resources
W. Joel White
Vice President-Information Technology
Robert G. Wilson
Vice President-Business Development
Charles E. Richardson III
General Counsel
STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION
Corporate Offices
Birmingham Steel Corporation
Suite 300
1000 Urban Center Drive
Birmingham, Alabama 35242-2516
(205) 970-1200 Main Office
(800) 888-9290 Toll-Free Main Office
(800) 276-6605 Toll Free Investor Relations
Internet Address
http://www.birsteel.com
Transfer Agent
To report changes of address, lost or
stolen stock certificates, or for
information regarding the Company's
dividend reinvestment plan, contact:
First Union National Bank
Corporate Trust Client Services, NC-1153
1525 West W. T. Harris Boulevard - 3C3
Charlotte, North Carolina 28288-1153
(800) 829-8432
Independent Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
Form 10-K
Information about Birmingham Steel
Corporation, including the Form 10-K,
may be obtained without charge by
writing to J. Daniel Garrett, Vice
President-Finance and Control, at the
Company's corporate offices.
Annual Meeting
10:00 a.m. local time
December 2, 1999
The Peabody Orlando Hotel
9801 International Drive
Orlando, Florida
Common Stock
The common stock of Birmingham Steel
Corporation is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol BIR.
The number of stockholders of record
as of October 7, 1999, was 1,496.
<PAGE>
[LOGO BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORPORATION APPEARS HERE]
