PFIZER INC, DEF 14A, 1994-03-18

PFIZER INC
DEF 14A, 1994-03-18
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS

Previous: PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC, 8-K, 1994-03-18

Next: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO, 10-K, 1994-03-18

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant /_/
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant /X/

Check the appropriate box:

/_/ Preliminary Proxy Statement
/X/ Definitive Proxy Statement
/_/ Definitive Additional Materials
/_/ Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

PFIZER INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

PFIZER INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

/X/ $125 per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a(i)(1) or 14a-6(j)(2).
/_/ $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3).
/_/ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

_____________________________________________________________________________

2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

_____________________________________________________________________________

3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:*

_____________________________________________________________________________

4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

_____________________________________________________________________________

/_/ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule
and the date of its filing.

1) Amount previously paid: _________________________________________________

2) Form, Schedule or Registration No. ______________________________________

3) Filing party: ___________________________________________________________

4) Date filed: _____________________________________________________________

___________
*Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined.
<PAGE>
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017-5755
(Pfizer Logo)
-----------------------------------

William C. Steere, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

Dear Fellow Shareholder: March 18, 1994

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Pfizer
Inc. which will be held on Thursday, April 28, 1994 at Pfizer's Central Research
facility on Eastern Point Road in Groton, Connecticut commencing at 10:00 a.m.
Directions to the meeting site and a map of the meeting site area can be found
at the end of the attached Proxy Statement.

This will be the first Annual Meeting held in many years outside of New York
City and the first time since 1965 that the meeting has been held at our Central
Research facility. Central Research has played -- and continues to play -- a
crucial role in the Company's business. The facility first came to prominence in
the 1950s with its successful mass production of our early antibiotic,
Terramycin. It since has become the center of Pfizer's pharmaceutical research,
and is considered one of the world's premier pharmaceutical research centers.

In recent years biotechnology has given us powerful new research tools that
enhance our ability to discover and rapidly evaluate a broad array of new
medicinal compounds. Our automated gene sequencing laboratory at Groton is among
the first to be established in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry and represents
our commitment to be a world leader in applying recombinant DNA technology to
drug discovery. We are pleased to offer our shareholders an opportunity to tour
our state-of-the-art facilities and to meet some of our scientists after the
Annual Meeting.

This booklet includes the Notice of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the
Proxy Statement. The Proxy Statement describes the business that will be
transacted at the Annual Meeting and provides information concerning the Company
that you should consider when you vote your shares.

At this year's meeting, among other things, you will be asked to consider and to
vote upon the election of three directors. All three nominees currently are
directors of the Company. Their experience and backgrounds have enabled them to
contribute significantly to the success of the Company. Accordingly, your Board
of Directors recommends that you vote FOR all of the nominees.

You also will be asked to approve the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick as the
Company's independent auditors for the 1994 fiscal year. Your Board of Directors
considers the firm well qualified for this position and therefore recommends
that you vote FOR this proposal.

In addition, you will be asked to approve the Company's Performance-Contingent
Share Award Program. This program was approved by your Board of Directors upon
the recommendation of the Executive Compensation Committee as part of the
revised executive compensation program that the Committee adopted in 1993. The
Performance-Contingent Share Awards made under the Program are contingent upon
the long-term performance of the Company thereby creating an important link to
shareholder value. Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this
proposal.

You also will be asked to consider two shareholder proposals. The first proposal
relates to executive compensation and the second proposal relates to stock
options. Your Board of Directors believes that if these two proposals were
implemented, they would impose rigid and arbitrary limitations on the Executive
Compensation Committee's ability to establish competitive compensation levels
that are necessary to enable the Company to successfully compete in our
industry. In addition, the proposals would undermine the important incentive
nature of the Company's executive compensation program. Your Board of Directors
therefore recommends that you vote AGAINST both proposals.

EACH OF THE ITEMS UPON WHICH YOU WILL BE ASKED TO VOTE IS DISCUSSED MORE FULLY
IN THE ATTACHED PROXY STATEMENT. WE URGE YOU TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT
COMPLETELY AND CAREFULLY SO THAT YOU CAN VOTE YOUR SHARES ON AN INFORMED BASIS.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting,
and regardless of the number of shares you own, your representation and vote are
very important. Therefore, we urge you to mark your choices, sign, date and
return the enclosed proxy promptly in the accompanying business reply envelope.
If you return a signed proxy without marking it, it will be voted in accordance
with the recommendations of your Board of Directors. You may attend the Annual
Meeting and vote in person, even if you previously have returned your proxy
form.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ William C. Steere, Jr.
--------------------------
William C. Steere, Jr.

<PAGE>

PFIZER INC.

235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017

Notice of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders

April 28, 1994
--------------------

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Pfizer Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), will be held at the Company's Central Research facility on
Eastern Point Road in Groton, Connecticut. Directions to the meeting site and a
map of the meeting site area can be found at the end of the Proxy Statement. The
meeting will be held on Thursday, April 28, 1994, at 10:00 a.m., to consider and
take action upon the following items:

(1) the election of three directors;

(2) a proposal to approve the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick as
independent auditors of the Company for the year 1994;

(3) a proposal to approve the Performance-Contingent Share Award
Program;

(4) a shareholder proposal relating to stock option grants to
executive officers;

(5) a shareholder proposal relating to executive compensation; and

(6) such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or
any adjournment thereof.

Shareholders of record, as of the close of business on February 28, 1994, are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. Beneficial owners of Company
common stock who are not shareholders of record, but instead hold their shares
in nominee names, must bring evidence of such ownership (such as an account
statement showing ownership of Company common stock) to be admitted to the
meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

/s/ C. L. Clemente
------------------
C. L. Clemente
Secretary

New York, NY, March 18, 1994

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IMPORTANT

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND IN PERSON, PLEASE VOTE BY MEANS OF
THE ENCLOSED PROXY. WE ASK YOU TO MARK YOUR CHOICES, SIGN, DATE AND
RETURN THE PROXY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IN THE ENCLOSED BUSINESS REPLY
ENVELOPE. IF YOU RETURN A SIGNED PROXY WITHOUT MARKING IT, IT WILL BE
VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS. BY PROMPTLY SIGNING AND RETURNING YOUR PROXY YOU WILL
ASSIST THE COMPANY IN REDUCING EXPENSES FOR ADDITIONAL PROXY
SOLICITATIONS.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1
<PAGE>

PFIZER INC.
235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017

PROXY STATEMENT

March 18, 1994

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the
Board of Directors of Pfizer Inc. (the "Company") of proxies for use at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28, 1994 ("Annual Meeting"),
or any adjournment thereof. Holders of record of shares of Company common stock
("Common Stock") at the close of business on February 28, 1994 (the "Record
Date") are entitled to vote at the meeting and each shareholder shall have one
vote for each share of Common Stock registered in his or her name. On the Record
Date, there were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting 319,964,571 shares of Common Stock.

As of the Record Date, no person owned of record or, to the Company's
knowledge, owned beneficially, five percent or more of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock.

The enclosed proxy may be revoked by the shareholder at any time before it is
voted by any of the following actions: the submission of a written revocation to
the Company, the return of a subsequently dated proxy to the Company, or by the
shareholder's personal vote at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement and
enclosed proxy are first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 18,
1994.

ITEM 1--ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

During 1993, the Company's Board of Directors ("Board") met eleven times. All
the directors attended 75 percent or more of the meetings of the Board and Board
committees on which they served in 1993.

The Board is divided into three classes. One class is elected each year for a
three-year term. This year the Board has nominated three individuals, all of
whom are now directors of the Company, to serve for three-year terms. The Board
unanimously recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" the three nominees for
directors.

The Board expects that all of the nominees will be available for election. In
the event, however, that any of them should become unavailable, it is intended
that the proxy would be voted for a nominee or nominees who would be designated
by the Board, unless the Board reduces the number of directors serving on the
Board.

Security Ownership of Management

As of February 17, 1994, the nominees, other directors, and certain executive
officers of the Company who are not directors of the Company, as named in the
following table, according to information confirmed by them, owned beneficially,
directly or indirectly, the number of shares of Common Stock indicated; held
options, exercisable within 60 days after that date, to purchase the number of
shares indicated, pursuant to the Company's Stock and Incentive Plan; and held
the number of units indicated, pursuant to the Company's Nonfunded Deferred
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. As of such date, no such person
beneficially owned more than .12 percent of the outstanding Common Stock; all
directors and executive officers as a group owned 961,278 shares of Common
Stock, and options, exercisable within 60 days after that date, to purchase
1,666,972 shares of Common Stock, which together amounted to less than one
percent of the outstanding Common Stock. As of February 17, 1994, no director or
officer owned any of the Company's convertible debentures.

2
<PAGE>

Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership of
Shares of
Name and Age as of the Position, Principal Occupation, Common Stock, (1)
April 28, 1994 Meeting Date Business Experience and Directorships Options and Units(2)
- --------------------------- ------------------------------------- --------------------

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 1997

<S> <C> <C> <C>
M. Anthony Burns ...........51 Chairman of the Board since 1985, Chief Executive Shares: 1,400
Officer since 1983, President and Director since
1979, of Ryder System, Inc., a full-service truck
(picture) leasing and highway transportation services
company. Director of The Chase Manhattan Bank,
N.A., The Chase Manhattan Corporation and J.C.
Penney Company, Inc. Director of the Company since
1988. Member of the Company's Executive
Compensation Committee.

Stanley O. Ikenberry ......59 President since 1979 of the University of Illinois, Shares: 2,863
a comprehensive public research university with Units: 6,386
campuses at Urbana-Champaign and Chicago. Director
(picture) of the Franklin Life Insurance Company, Harris
Bank, Utilicorp United Inc. and the Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Director of the Company since 1982. Chair of the
Company's Audit Committee.

Franklin D. Raines ........45 Vice Chairman since 1991 of the Federal National Shares: 301
Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), a company Units: 358
that provides a secondary market for residential
(picture) mortgages through portfolio purchases, issuance of
mortgage-backed securities, and other services.
General Partner in municipal finance at the
investment banking firm of Lazard Freres & Co.
from 1985-1990. Director of Fannie Mae and the
MITRE Corporation. Director of the Company since
August 1993. Member of the Company's Audit
Committee.

3
<PAGE>

DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 1995

Grace J. Fippinger..........66 Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer from Shares: 3,341
1984 through 1990 of NYNEX Corporation, an
exchange telecommunications and exchange access
(picture) services company. Director of the Bear Stearns
Companies, Inc., Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
Company and Paramount Communications, Inc.
Director of the Company since 1976. Member of the
Company's Executive Committee and Nominating
Committee.

James T. Lynn...............67 Senior Advisor to Lazard Freres & Co., Shares: 3,200
Investment Bankers, since 1992. Chairman and Chief
Executive of Aetna Life and Casualty Company from
(picture) 1984 to 1992 and Director from 1979 to 1992.
Director of TRW Inc. Director of the Company since
1979. Chair of the Company's Nominating Committee.

Paul A. Marks...............67 President and Chief Executive Officer since 1980 Shares: 2,400
of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, a Units: 19,444
private health care institution devoted to cancer
(picture) prevention, patient care, research and education.
Director of several Dreyfus Mutual Funds, Life
Technologies, Inc. and National Health
Laboratories. Director of the Company since 1978.
Member of the Company's Nominating Committee.

Edmund T. Pratt, Jr.........67 Chairman Emeritus of the Company since Shares: 388,523
1992. Chairman of the Board of the Company Units: 1,384
from 1972 to 1992. Chief Executive Officer of the
(picture) Company from 1972 until 1991. Director of The
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., The Chase Manhattan
Corporation, Celgene Corporation, General Motors
Corporation, International Paper Company and
Minerals Technologies Inc. Director of the Company
since 1969. Member of the Company's Executive
Committee.

4
<PAGE>

Felix G. Rohatyn ..........65 General Partner of Lazard Freres & Co., Shares: 5,200
Investment Bankers, since 1960. Director of Units: 4,684
Howmet Corporation, Pechiney, S.A. and General
(picture) Instrument Corporation. Former Chairman of the
Municipal Assistance Corporation for the City of
New York, serving from 1975 to 1993. Director of
the Company since 1971. Member of the Company's
Executive Committee and Audit Committee.

William C. Steere, Jr.......57 Chairman of the Board of the Company since Shares: 70,308
March 1992. Chief Executive Officer of the Options: 181,526
Company since 1991. President of the Company from
(picture) 1991 to 1992. Senior Vice President of the Company
from 1989 to 1991. Vice President of the Company
from 1983 to 1989, and President-- Pharmaceuticals
Group from 1986 through January 1991. Director of
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Minerals
Technologies Inc. and Texaco Inc. Chairman of the
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association. Director
of the Company since 1987. Chair of the Company's
Executive Committee.

DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 1996

Edward C. Bessey............59 Vice Chairman of the Company since 1992. Shares: 55,313
President, U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group since 1992. Options: 114,754
Executive Vice President of the Company from 1991
(picture) to 1992. Senior Vice President of the Company from
1989 to 1991. Vice President of the Company from
1983 to 1989, and President-- Hospital Products
Group from 1982 through 1991. Responsible for the
Consumer Products Group since 1991. Director of
the Company since 1987.

5
<PAGE>

William J. Crowe, Jr........69 Professor of Geopolitics at the University of Shares: 1,471
Oklahoma since 1990 and Chairman of the
President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
(picture) since 1993. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
U.S. Department of Defense, from 1985 to 1989.
Admiral Crowe retired from the Navy in 1989 after
a 47-year career. Director of Merrill Lynch & Co.,
Inc., Norfolk Southern Corporation, Texaco Inc.
and General Dynamics Corporation. Director of the
Company since 1989. Member of the Company's Audit
Committee.

Constance J. Horner.........52 Guest Scholar since 1993 at The Brookings Shares: 1,126
Institution, an organization devoted to
nonpartisan research, education and publication in
(picture) economics, government, foreign policy and social
sciences. Visiting Lecturer, Princeton University
since February 1994. Served at the White House as
Assistant to the President and Director of
Presidential Personnel from August 1991 to January
1993. Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services from 1989 to 1991. Director of
the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (formerly
known as the Civil Service Commission) from 1985
to 1989. Commissioner, U.S. Commission on Civil
Rights. Director of the Company since 1993. Member
of the Company's Audit Committee.

Thomas G. Labrecque.........55 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a Director Shares: 1,400
of The Chase Manhattan Corporation, a bank holding
company, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. since
(picture) 1990. President of The Chase Manhattan Corporation
and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. from 1981 to
1990. Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York and Alumax Inc. Member of the President's
Advisory Committee on Trade Policy and
Negotiations, the Council on Foreign Relations,
the Council on Competitiveness, and the Trilateral
Commission. Director of the Company since 1993.
Member of the Company's Executive Compensation
Committee.

6
<PAGE>

John R. Opel................69 Chairman from 1986 to 1993 and a Member from Shares: 3,200
1974 to 1993 of the Executive Committee of Units: 25,173
International Business Machines Corporation
(picture) ("IBM"), a maker and distributor of information
processing equipment, systems program products,
telecommunications systems, and related supplies
and services. Chairman of the Board of IBM from
1983 to 1986 and Chief Executive Officer from 1981
to 1985. Director of IBM and the Prudential
Insurance Company of America. Director of the
Company since 1973. Member of the Company's
Executive Committee and Chair of the Company's
Executive Compensation Committee.

Jean-Paul Valles............57 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 1992 Shares: 77,325
of Minerals Technologies Inc., a resource and Options: 93,770
technology-based company that develops, produces Units: 985
(picture) and markets specialty mineral, mineral-based and
synthetic mineral products. Formerly Vice Chairman
of the Company from March to October 1992.
Executive Vice President of the Company from 1991
to 1992. Senior Vice President of the Company from
1989 through 1991. Senior Vice President-- Finance
of the Company from 1989 to 1990 and Vice
President-- Finance of the Company from 1980 to
1989. Director of the Company since 1980.

7
<PAGE>

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT DIRECTORS

Henry A. McKinnell, Jr......51 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Shares: 15,767
Officer of the Company; President of the Options: 85,420
Company's Hospital Products Group. Director of
Aviall, Inc.

Robert Neimeth..............58 Executive Vice President of the Company; Shares: 41,749
President of the Company's International Options: 117,030
Pharmaceuticals Group.

John F. Niblack.............55 Executive Vice President-- Research and Development. Shares: 11,579
Options: 50,371
</TABLE>

- -----------
(1) As of February 17, 1994, includes shares credited under the Savings and
Investment Plan. The Plan is described in this Proxy Statement under the
heading "Employee Benefit Plans." This table does not include the following
number of shares held in the names of family members, as to which
beneficial ownership is disclaimed: Mr. Pratt -- 30,000.

(2) As of February 17, 1994, these units are held under the Pfizer Inc.
Nonfunded Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The value
of a director's unit account is measured by the price of the Common Stock.
The Plan is further described in this Proxy Statement under the heading
"Benefit Plans for Non-Employee Directors."

8
<PAGE>

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation during
the last three fiscal years of each of the five most highly compensated
executive officers of the Company (hereafter referred to collectively as the
"Named Executive Officers").

Summary Compensation Table
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Long Term
Compensation
Awards
---------------------
Annual Compensation Restricted Securities
----------------------- Stock Underlying All Other
Name and Salary Bonus(1) Awards(2) Options Compensation(3)
Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) (#) ($)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
W.C. Steere, Jr.......................... 1993 1,100,000 800,000 600,023 75,000 64,000
Chairman/CEO
W.C. Steere, Jr. ........................ 1992 1,000,000 500,000 N/A 92,700 54,000
Chairman/CEO
W.C. Steere, Jr. ........................ 1991 725,000 350,000 N/A 80,000 38,000
CEO/President
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E.C. Bessey ............................. 1993 600,000 275,000 100,023 16,500 32,600
Vice Chairman; President, U.S.
Pharmaceuticals Group
E.C. Bessey ............................. 1992 571,000 215,000 N/A 34,502 30,040
Vice Chairman; President, U.S.
Pharmaceuticals Group
E.C. Bessey ............................. 1991 507,500 180,000 N/A 33,000 27,500
Executive V.P.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H. McKinnell, Jr. ....................... 1993 505,000 290,000 135,020 30,000 26,600
Executive V.P. & CFO;
President -- HPG
H. McKinnell, Jr. ....................... 1992 425,000 160,000 N/A 29,050 21,000
Executive V.P. & CFO;
President -- HPG
H. McKinnell, Jr. ....................... 1991 355,000 100,000 N/A 20,000 17,400
V.P.-- Finance & CFO
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. Neimeth .............................. 1993 485,000 245,000 105,048 15,000 25,400
Executive V.P.; President-- Inter-
national Pharmaceuticals Group
R. Neimeth .............................. 1992 450,000 150,000 N/A 26,150 23,000
Executive V.P.; President-- Inter-
national Pharmaceuticals Group
R. Neimeth .............................. 1991 400,000 125,000 N/A 24,000 21,000
President-- Pfizer International
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J.F. Niblack ............................ 1993 500,000 225,000 75,018 25,000 24,000
Executive V.P.-- Research and
Development
J.F. Niblack ............................ 1992 402,500 100,000 N/A 31,010 19,700
Vice President; President-- Central
Research
J.F. Niblack ............................ 1991 325,000 90,000 N/A 17,000 16,000
Vice President; President-- Central
Research

</TABLE>

- -----------

(1) The amounts shown in this column for 1993 constitute the Annual Incentive
Awards made to each officer based upon the Board's evaluation of each
officer's performance. These awards are discussed in further detail in the
Executive Compensation Committee's Report on page 12 of this Proxy
Statement.

(2) The numbers in this column represent the dollar value on the date of grant
of the following number of restricted shares of the Company's Common Stock:
Mr. Steere - 10,390 shares; Mr. Bessey - 1,732 shares; Dr. McKinnell -
2,338 shares; Mr. Neimeth - 1,819 shares; and Dr. Niblack - 1,299 shares.
All such shares of restricted stock will vest as follows: one-third on
February 17, 1995, one-third on February 17, 1996 and one-third on February
17, 1997. Dividends will be paid during the restricted period.

(3) The numbers in this column constitute Company matching funds under the
Company's Savings and Investment Plan and related supplemental plan. These
Plans are described in this Proxy Statement under the heading "Employee
Benefit Plans."

9
<PAGE>

Option Grants in 1993

The following table shows all options to purchase the Company's Common Stock
granted to each of the Named Executive Officers of the Company in 1993 and the
potential value of such grants at stock price appreciation rates of 0%, 5% and
10%, compounded annually over the maximum ten-year term of the options. Also
shown is the potential gain of all outstanding shares of Common Stock held by
the Company's shareholders as of December 31, 1993 using the same base price and
appreciation rates and compounded over the same ten-year period. The 5% and 10%
rates of appreciation are required to be disclosed by the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and are not intended to forecast
possible future actual appreciation, if any, in the Company's stock prices. The
Company did not use an alternative present value formula permitted by the rules
of the SEC because in the Company's view, potential future unknown or volatile
factors result in there being no such formula that can determine with reasonable
accuracy the present value of such option grants.

Potential Realizable Value at
Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price
Individual Grants Appreciation for Option Term ($)
----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
Percent
Number of of Total
Securities Options
Underlying Granted to Exercise
Options Employees or Base
Granted in Fiscal Price Expiration
Name (#) Year ($/Sh) Date 0% 5% 10%
---- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- -- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
W.C. Steere, Jr......... 75,000(1) 2.33 63.00 8/25/2003 0 2,971,527 7,530,433
E.C. Bessey............. 16,500(2) 0.51 63.00 8/25/2003 0 653,736 1,656,695
H. McKinnell, Jr........ 30,000(3) 0.93 63.00 8/25/2003 0 1,188,611 3,012,173
R. Neimeth.............. 15,000(2) 0.47 63.00 8/25/2003 0 594,305 1,506,087
J.F. Niblack............ 25,000(4) 0.78 63.00 8/25/2003 0 990,509 2,510,144
All Shareholders........ N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 12,716,047,331 32,224,960,579

</TABLE>

- -----------

(1) Mr. Steere's options are first exercisable as follows: 12,500 options on
8/26/94; 12,500 options on 8/26/95; 12,500 options on 8/26/96 and 37,500
options on 8/26/97.

(2) Mr. Bessey's and Mr. Neimeth's options are first exercisable as follows:
one-quarter on 8/26/94; one-quarter on 8/26/95; one-quarter on 8/26/96; and
one-quarter on 8/26/97.

(3) Dr. McKinnell's options are first exercisable as follows: 5,000 options on
8/26/94; 5,000 options on 8/26/95; 5,000 options on 8/26/96 and 15,000
options on 8/26/97.

(4) Dr. Niblack's options are first exercisable as follows: 3,750 options on
8/26/94; 3,750 options on 8/26/95; 3,750 options on 8/26/96; and 13,750
options on 8/26/97.

Aggregated Option Exercises in 1993 and
Option Values at December 31, 1993

The following table provides information as to options exercised by each of
the Named Executive Officers in 1993, and the value of the remaining options
held by each such executive officer at year-end, measured using the mean of the
high and the low trading price ($69.3125) of the Company's Common Stock on
December 31, 1993.

No. of Securities Underlying Value of Unexercised
Unexercised Options Held In-the-Money Options
at 12/31/93 (#) at 12/31/93 ($)
---------------------------- -------------------------
Shares
Acquired on Value
Exercise Realized Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
Name (#) ($) (#) (#) ($) ($)
---- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
W. C. Steere, Jr. ............... 2,412 101,796 182,682 145,000 3,239,452 473,438
E. C. Bessey .................... 42,882 1,524,520 114,754 33,000 2,404,700 104,156
H. McKinnell, Jr. ............... 2,200 94,513 88,968 44,000 2,171,750 189,375
R. Neimeth ...................... 0 0 117,030 27,500 3,073,204 94,688
J. F. Niblack ................... 2,730 74,720 50,371 41,666 785,523 157,813

</TABLE>

10
<PAGE>

Long-Term Incentive Plan -- Awards in 1993

The following table provides information concerning the participation of the
Named Executive Officers in a long-term compensation plan called the
Performance-Contingent Share Award Program pursuant to which they were awarded
the right to earn shares of the Company's Common Stock ("Performance-Contingent
Shares"). Actual payouts of these Performance-Contingent Shares, if any, will be
determined by a non-discretionary formula which measures the Company's
performance from January 1, 1993 through December 31 of the year shown under the
column headed "Performance Period (or Other Period Until Maturation or Payout)"
using certain performance goals that were determined by the Company's Executive
Compensation Committee and approved by the Board. The formula is comprised of
two performance criteria--growth in total shareholder return and growth in
earnings per share--over the performance period relative to the industry peer
group ("Peer Group") referred to in the Performance Graph shown on page 15 of
this Proxy Statement. To the extent that the Company's performance exceeds the
low end of the range of Peer Group performance for either or both of the
performance criteria, a varying amount of shares up to the maximum will be
earned. Details regarding these awards are discussed in the Executive
Compensation Committee's Report beginning on page 12 of this Proxy Statement. In
addition, the Program is discussed in Item 3 of this Proxy Statement which seeks
Shareholder approval of the Program so as to enable the Company to qualify for
certain tax deductions.

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Stock Price-Based Plans
---------------------------------------
Performance Period
(or Other Period
Number of Until Maturation Threshold(2) Target Maximum
Name Shares(1) or Payout) (#) (#) (#)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>

W. C. Steere, Jr. * 1993-94 1,000 6,000 10,000
* 1993-95 1,500 9,000 15,000
* 1993-96 2,000 12,000 20,000
* 1993-97 2,500 15,000 25,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. C. Bessey * 1993-94 360 2,160 3,600
* 1993-95 540 3,240 5,400
* 1993-96 720 4,320 7,200
* 1993-97 900 5,400 9,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H. McKinnell, Jr. * 1993-94 360 2,160 3,600
* 1993-95 540 3,240 5,400
* 1993-96 720 4,320 7,200
* 1993-97 900 5,400 9,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. Neimeth * 1993-94 300 1,800 3,000
* 1993-95 450 2,700 4,500
* 1993-96 600 3,600 6,000
* 1993-97 750 4,500 7,500
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. F. Niblack * 1993-94 300 1,800 3,000
* 1993-95 450 2,700 4,500
* 1993-96 600 3,600 6,000
* 1993-97 750 4,500 7,500
</TABLE>

- -----------
(1) The actual number of Performance-Contingent Shares that will be paid out at
the end of each period, if any, is not yet determinable because the shares
earned by the Named Executive Officers will be based upon the Company's
future performance compared to the future performance of the Peer Group.

(2) If the minimum performance of the Company in both performance measures is
at the low end of the range relative to the Peer Group, then no
Performance-Contingent Shares will be earned by the Named Executive
Officers. To the extent that the Company's performance exceeds the low end
of the range of Peer Group performance, the minimum shares that will be
awarded is shown in the "Threshold" column.

11
<PAGE>

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Upon the recommendation of the Committee, the Board adopted a revised
executive compensation program in 1993. The objectives of the new program are
twofold. The first objective is to retain the executives who have contributed to
the Company's success by insuring that they are competitively paid. The second
objective is to more closely tie executive compensation to Company performance.
The executive officers who are now being compensated under the new program are
the Chairman and CEO and the other officers who report directly to him,
including all of the Named Executive Officers. In addition, upon the
recommendation of the Committee, the Board adopted a stock ownership program in
1993 under which the Named Executive Officers and other members of senior
management are expected to own a specified minimum amount of Common Stock. This
program is discussed in the section of this report headed "Stock Ownership
Program." The last section of this report is a Glossary which contains
definitions of the capitalized terms used in the report unless such terms are
previously defined in this Proxy Statement.

As discussed below, the revised executive compensation program consists of
three elements--(1) base salary, (2) Annual Incentive Awards and (3) long-term
compensation consisting of Stock Options and Performance-Contingent Shares, both
of which are linked to Company performance.

Evaluation of Executive Performance

In evaluating the performance of the Chairman and CEO and the Company's other
executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, for 1993, the
Committee has taken note of management's accomplishments in enhancing the
Company's financial performance. In 1993, management's strategies included the
continued divestiture of under-performing operations and operations unrelated to
the Company's strategic focus on health care, the improvement of operating
margins, and maintaining the flow of new product candidates from research. The
Committee believes that the success of these strategies is evidenced by the
Company's strong financial performance from ongoing operations in 1993, the
improvement in operating margins, the strength of the Company's current product
portfolio, and the number of new product candidates currently under development.

The Committee has also taken into account management's ability to address the
ongoing challenges within the marketplace for U.S. health care products and
services. Of particular importance to the Company at this time is the potential
impact of proposed health care reforms. It is the Committee's opinion that in
this ever-changing environment, management continues to effectively develop and
implement strategies that will enable the Company to remain a leader in the
health care industry. Mr. Steere and his senior management team have undertaken,
and continue to undertake, significant action to effectively communicate the
Company's position on health care issues to our shareholders, the public and the
government. The benefits of these efforts to the Company cannot, of course, be
quantifiably measured but the Committee believes these efforts are vital to the
Company's continuing success in the 1990s.

The Committee believes that a significant portion of management's
compensation should be tied to the performance of the Company. Mr. Steere and
the executive officers who report directly to him, including the Named Executive
Officers, have been granted the opportunity to substantially increase their
total compensation packages through annual incentive awards and long-term
compensation opportunities (discussed below), the value of which will be
contingent on the Company and/or the executives achieving certain performance
criteria. Conversely, their incentive compensation, both annual and long-term
could fall all the way to zero depending upon the extent to which performance
falls short of expectations.

Salary

The salaries of the Chairman and CEO and the other executive officers for
1993 were based on an evaluation of individual job performance and an assessment
of the salaries paid by the Peer Group to executives holding equivalent
positions at such companies. The salaries awarded to Mr. Steere and the other
executive officers all fall within the midpoints of the ranges paid by the Peer
Group to executives holding comparable positions. In making its decision on
salary levels, the Committee did not use any predetermined formula or assign any
particular weight to any individual criterion. Mr. Steere's salary for 1993 was
$1,100,000. For 1994 it has been set at $1,000,000 as part of the new variable
compensation program adopted last year.

Annual Incentive Awards

The second element of the compensation program is a newly adopted annual cash
incentive award program. For Mr. Steere, the Annual Incentive Award can range
from 0% to 200% of salary depending upon the Board's evaluation of Mr. Steere's
performance as described above under "Evaluation of Executive Performance" based
on performance indicators established by the Committee and approved by the Board
to serve as the basis for an assessment of Mr. Steere's performance

12
<PAGE>

for the year. After reviewing actual results against the performance indicators,
the Committee recommended and the Board approved an Annual Cash Incentive Award
for Mr. Steere of $800,000. As part of the transition to the long-term incentive
award program described in the next section and the stock ownership program also
described in this report, the Committee decided to award Mr. Steere a one-time
restricted stock award of 10,390 shares of Company Common Stock, one-third of
which will vest on February 17 in each of the years ending in 1995, 1996 and
1997. Prior to vesting, the shares will be subject to forfeiture if Mr. Steere
does not continue as a Company employee during the restricted periods unless his
employment ends as a result of his disability, death or a change in control of
the Company.

The 1993 Annual Incentive Awards for the other executive officers were based
on the same performance indicators established in respect of Mr. Steere's annual
award. In addition, the officers were required to achieve certain goals relating
to their positions as well as goals contained in the Operating Plans of the
businesses for which they are responsible. The cash awards paid to each of the
Named Executive Officers are shown in the "Bonus" column and the restricted
stock awards granted to each of the Named Executive Officers are shown in the
footnote to the "Restricted Stock Award" column of the Summary Compensation
Table on page 9 of this Proxy Statement.

Long-Term Incentive Awards

In 1993, Mr. Steere and officers reporting directly to him, including the
Named Executive Officers, participated in a long-term incentive program. The
program consisted, in part, of stock option grants and in addition, on the
recommendation of the Committee, a plan to grant each executive officer the
opportunity to earn Performance-Contingent Shares based upon the Company's
achievement of predetermined corporate performance goals over a five-year
period. The maximum number of Performance-Contingent Shares that may be earned
by Mr. Steere and the other Named Executive Officers is shown on page 11 of this
Proxy Statement in the table headed "Long-Term Incentive Plans -- Awards in
1993." The potential size of each award, including the maximum number of shares
that may be earned by each executive officer, was established after examining
similar awards made by the Peer Group to executives holding comparable positions
at those companies. Payments pursuant to the awards are determined by a
non-discretionary formula comprised of two performance criteria: total
shareholder return and earnings per share growth over the performance period
relative to the performance of the Peer Group. The performance formula weighs
each criteria equally. To the extent that the Company's performance exceeds the
low end of the range of performance of the Peer Group in either or both of the
performance criteria, a varying amount of shares up to the maximum will be
earned. In connection with the 1993 award for Mr. Steere that extends for five
years, the number of Performance Shares that may be earned will range from 0 to
25,000. For the other Named Executive Officers the number of Performance
Contingent Shares that may be earned will range from 0 to 9,000.

In order to introduce this new compensation program the Committee also
recommended and the Board approved awards of Performance-Contingent Shares to
Mr. Steere and the other executive officers which they may earn during
performance periods beginning in 1993 and continuing for two, three and four
years, provided that the same requisite performance criteria as in the five-year
awards are met during the applicable performance period. These interim awards
are designed to gradually phase in the full five-year program. The maximum
number of Performance-Contingent Shares that each Named Executive Officer can
earn in each of the years is contained in the table headed "Long-Term Incentive
Plans -- Awards in 1993" table on page 11 of this Proxy Statement.

The Committee also granted stock options to each executive officer in 1993.
In selecting the size of these stock option grants, the Committee reviewed
competitive data relating to grants made by the Peer Group to executive officers
holding comparable positions at those companies, the individual stock ownership
of the executive officers and the Performance-Contingent Share awards made to
such officers. Based upon this data, Mr. Steere was awarded options on 75,000
shares of Common Stock and the other Named Executive Officers were awarded the
number of options shown in the Option Table on page 10 of this Proxy Statement.
The value of the stock options granted to Mr. Steere and the other Named
Executive Officers, when combined with the value of the Performance-Contingent
Shares that the officers may potentially earn, fall within the midpoints of the
range of value of long-term incentives and total option grants made by the Peer
Group to executive officers at similar levels.

Tax Policy

The Annual Incentive Awards granted for 1993 are not eligible for the
performance-based exception to the $1 million deduction limitation for
compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") because they were awarded based in
part on non-quantifiable goals such as restructuring the Company to meet the
requirements of the new health care marketplace. The Committee and the Board
believe that it is in the

13
<PAGE>

best interests of the shareholders to set such non-quantifiable goals. From time
to time it may also be in the best of interests of the shareholders to set other
non-quantifiable goals which it would be counterproductive to disclose publicly.
The Committee and the Board will continue to evaluate their position as the
regulations under the Code are developed.

The Performance-Contingent Share Awards granted in August 1993 are not
eligible for the performance-based exception to the $1 million deduction
limitation for compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers imposed by the
Code because after the awards were granted, the Internal Revenue Service issued
proposed regulations that disallow as performance-based compensation any
compensation that would be paid for the attainment of performance goals that had
been established after the commencement of the performance period.

In order for the 1994 and subsequent years' grants of Performance-Contingent
Share Awards to be eligible for the performance-based compensation exception,
the Committee and the Board have decided to submit for shareholder approval the
proposal set forth in Item 3 on page 21 of this Proxy Statement.

Stock Ownership Program

In conjunction with the revised executive compensation program, a stock
ownership program was adopted by the Board upon the Committee's recommendation
in August of 1993. Under the guidelines of this program, employee directors
(currently Messrs. Steere and Bessey) are expected to own stock equal in value
to at least three times their annual salaries. The program also extends to other
elected corporate officers of the Company. More specifically, the other Named
Executive Officers are expected to own stock valued at least two times their
annual salary, as are certain other executives. All other elected corporate
officers are expected to own stock valued at least equal to their annual
salaries.

Under the program, "stock ownership" is defined as stock owned by the
executive officer directly or through the Company's Savings and Investment Plan.
The Named Executive Officers and other participants in this program have been
given five years in which to comply with this program. The Committee will
monitor the participation of the Named Executive Officers and expects that
incremental progress will be made each year by each officer during the phase-in
period. The level of each Named Executive Officer's stock ownership also will be
considered as a factor by the Committee when awarding future stock option
grants.

Glossary

Annual Incentive Awards. These awards are annual cash payments which may be
awarded by the Committee to executive officers on the basis of both Company
performance and individual performance over the prior year. The performance
indicators used to serve as the basis for an assessment of the performance of
the executive officers are established by the Committee (and approved by the
Board in the case of the CEO) prior to the performance period.

Named Executive Officers. This refers to the five most highly compensated
executive officers of the Company--Messrs. Steere, Bessey and Neimeth and Drs.
McKinnell and Niblack.

Peer Group. This group consists of the twelve health care companies
referred to in the Performance Graph that follows this report.

Performance-Contingent Shares. These are shares of Pfizer Inc. Common Stock
that may be awarded to the Named Executive Officers and certain other employees
of the Company under the Performance-Contingent Share Award Program. For shares
to be issued to any such officer or employee, however, certain preestablished
Company performance criteria must be met. The text of this program is included
in this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A.

Stock and Incentive Plan. This refers to the Pfizer Inc. Stock and Incentive
Plan which is described in further detail on page 17 of this Proxy Statement.

THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:

Mr. Opel (Chair)
Mr. Burns
Mr. Labrecque

14
<PAGE>

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Set forth below is a graph comparing the total shareholder returns (assuming
reinvestment of dividends) of the Company, the Standard & Poor's ("S&P") 500
Composite Stock Index ("S&P 500"), and an industry peer index compiled by the
Company that consists of the following companies: Abbott Laboratories, American
Cyanamid Co., American Home Products Corp., Baxter International Inc.,
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Johnson & Johnson, Eli
Lilly and Company, Merck and Co., Inc., Schering-Plough Corp., Upjohn Co. and
Warner-Lambert Company. The peer group consolidation was done on a weighted
average basis (market capitalization basis, adjusted at the beginning of each
year). The graph assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1988 in the Company and
each of the other indices.

Cumulative Total Returns*
1989 thru 1993
(The table below was represented by a graph in the printed proxy statement.)

1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Pfizer 100 124.1 149.4 317.7 279.7 273.3
Peer Group 100 142 166.4 250.9 212.3 198.6
S&P 500 100 131.6 127.4 166.2 178.8 196.7

* Based on Share Price Appreciation and Assuming Reinvestment of Dividends

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Retirement Annuity Plan

The Retirement Annuity Plan (the "Retirement Plan") is a funded, tax
qualified, noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers certain
employees, including the Named Executive Officers shown in the Summary
Compensation Table. Benefits under the Retirement Plan are based upon the
employee's earnings during service with Pfizer and/or its Associate Companies
and are payable after retirement generally in the form of an annuity. Earnings
covered by the Retirement Plan are actual salary, wages, bonuses and other
remuneration earned. Beginning in 1989, however, the Internal Revenue Service
limited the amount of annual earnings that may be considered in calculating
benefits under the Retirement Plan. For 1994, the current annual limitation is
$150,000. The value of benefits, such as stock options, is not considered
earnings for the purposes of the Retirement Plan.

Benefits under the Company's Retirement Plan are calculated as an annuity
equal to the greater of (i) 1.4 percent of the average earnings for the five
highest consecutive calendar years prior to January 1, 1992 multiplied by years
of service, up to 35 years, or (ii) 1.75 percent of such earnings less 1.5
percent of Primary Social Security benefits multiplied by years of service, up
to 35 years. Actual earnings are used in benefit calculations for the period
after December 31, 1991 under both formulas. Contributions to the Retirement
Plan are made entirely by the Company and are paid into a trust fund from which
the benefits of participants will be paid.

15
<PAGE>

In accordance with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, the
Retirement Plan currently limits pensions paid under the Plan to an annual
maximum of $118,800 (provided, however, that based upon certain provisions in
the Retirement Plan in effect as of July 1, 1982, employees may receive a larger
pension if entitled thereto as of December 31, 1982). The Company also has a
supplemental plan that provides that the Company will pay out of its general
assets, an amount substantially equal to the difference between the amount that
would have been payable under the Retirement Plan, in the absence of legislation
limiting pension benefits, and earnings that may be considered in calculating
pension benefits and the amount actually payable under the Retirement Plan.

Pension Plan Tables

The following table shows, for the aggregate salary and bonus levels and
years of service indicated, the annual pension benefit, payable commencing upon
retirement at age 65 under the present benefit formula of the Retirement Plan
and its related supplemental plan. The estimated retirement benefits have been
computed on the assumptions that (i) payments will be made in the form of a 50
percent joint and survivor annuity (and both the plan member and spouse are age
65), (ii) during the period of employment the employee received annual
compensation increases of six percent and (iii) the employee retired as of
December 31, 1993.

Years of Service
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remuneration 15 20 25 30 35
------------ --------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 225,000.................... $ 39,914 $ 52,809 $ 65,704 $ 78,600 $ 91,495
250,000.................... 44,647 59,074 73,502 87,929 102,357
300,000.................... 54,113 71,605 89,097 106,589 124,081
400,000.................... 73,045 96,666 120,287 143,908 167,529
450,000.................... 82,512 109,197 135,882 162,567 189,253
500,000.................... 91,978 121,727 151,477 181,227 210,977
600,000.................... 110,910 146,789 182,667 218,546 254,425
725,000.................... 134,576 178,115 221,655 265,195 308,735
750,000.................... 139,309 184,381 229,453 274,525 319,597
800,000.................... 148,775 196,911 245,048 293,184 341,321
875,000.................... 162,974 215,707 268,440 321,173 373,906
1,000,000.................... 186,640 247,034 307,428 367,822 428,216
1,200,000.................... 224,504 297,156 369,808 442,460 515,112
1,500,000.................... 281,301 372,340 463,379 554,417 645,456
1,800,000.................... 338,098 447,524 556,949 666,374 775,800
2,200,000.................... 413,828 547,769 681,710 815,651 949,591

</TABLE>

The following table shows the estimated retirement benefit under the benefit
formula of the Retirement Plan and its related supplemental plan for the Named
Executive Officers, using the following assumptions: (i) payments will be made
in the form of a 50 percent joint and survivor annuity; (ii) employment will be
continued until normal retirement at age 65; and (iii) 1993 levels of creditable
compensation will continue throughout the remainder of the computation period.
As of December 31, 1993, the period of service covered by the Retirement Plan
and the supplemental plan are, for Mr. Steere -- 34 years, 4 months; Mr. Bessey
- -- 29 years, 8 months; Dr. Niblack -- 26 years, 1 month; Mr. Neimeth -- 31
years, 4 months; and Dr. McKinnell -22 years, 10 months. Current compensation
covered by the Plans are the amounts set forth in the 1993 "Salary" and "Bonus"
columns of the Summary Compensation Table for each of the Named Executive
Officers.

Estimated
Amount
Name of Annuity
---- ----------
W. C. Steere, Jr. ....................... $512,546
E. C. Bessey ............................ 306,686
H. McKinnell, Jr. ....................... 280,659
R. Neimeth .............................. 255,303
J. F. Niblack ........................... 220,160

Savings and Investment Plan

Under the terms of the Savings and Investment Plan (the "Savings Plan"),
participating employees may contribute up to 15 percent of regular earnings into
their Savings Plan accounts. A participating employee may elect to make
after-tax contributions, before-tax contributions, or both after-tax and
before-tax contributions. In addition, under the Savings Plan, the Company con-

16
<PAGE>

tributes an amount equal to one dollar for each dollar contributed by
participating employees up to the first two percent of their regular earnings
and fifty cents for each additional dollar contributed by employees on the next
four percent of their regular earnings. The Company's matching contributions are
invested solely in the Company's Common Stock.

In accordance with the requirements of the Code, the Savings Plan currently
limits the additions that can be made to a participating employee's account to
$30,000 per year. The term "additions" includes Company matching contributions,
before-tax contributions made by the Company at the request of the participating
employee under Section 401(k) of the Code, and employee after-tax contributions.

Of those additions, the maximum before-tax contribution is limited, effective
January 1, 1994, to $9,240 per year. Also, effective January 1, 1994, no more
than $150,000 of annual compensation may be taken into account in computing
benefits under the Savings Plan, in accordance with the Code. The Company has a
supplemental plan to pay out of general assets, an amount substantially equal to
the difference between the amount that, in the absence of legislation limiting
such additions and the $150,000 limitation on earnings, would have been
allocated to a participating employee's account as employee before-tax
contributions, Company matching contributions and forfeitures, and the amount
actually allocated under the Savings Plan. Employees affected by these
limitations can make limited deferrals of income under this supplemental plan
and receive credit for such deferrals towards their retirement benefit under the
Company's retirement plans.

Amounts deferred, if any, under the Savings Plan and the related supplemental
plan in 1993 by the Company's Named Executive Officers, are included in the
"Salary" column of the Summary Compensation Table shown on page 9 of this Proxy
Statement. Company matching contributions allocated to the Named Executive
Officers under the Savings Plan and the related supplemental plan are shown in
the "All Other Compensation" column of the Summary Compensation table.

Stock and Incentive Plan

Pursuant to the Stock and Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan"), Company
employees may be granted stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards,
or performance unit awards, either as a result of a general grant or as a result
of an award based on having met certain performance criteria, as determined by
the Employee Compensation and Management Development Committee or the Executive
Compensation Committee, as applicable. Non-employee directors of the Company are
not eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan.

SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS

The Company has entered into severance agreements with certain executive
officers, including each of the Named Executive Officers shown in the Summary
Compensation Table. The agreements continue through May 31 of each year, and are
automatically extended in one-year increments unless the Company has given prior
notice of termination.

These agreements are intended to provide for continuity of management in the
event of a change in control of the Company. The agreements provide that covered
executive officers could be entitled to certain severance benefits following a
change in control of the Company. If, following a change in control, the
executive is terminated by the Company for any reason, other than for disability
or for cause, or if such executive officer terminates his or her employment for
good reason (as this term is defined in the agreements), then the executive
officer is entitled to a severance payment that will be 2.99 times the executive
officer's base amount, as defined in the agreements. The severance payment is
generally made in the form of a lump sum. For a period of up to two years, the
Company would also provide life, disability, accident and health insurance
coverage substantially similar to the benefits provided before termination.

If a change in control occurs, the agreements are effective for a period of
four years from the end of the then existing term. Under the severance
agreements, a change in control would include any of the following events: (i)
any "person", as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
acquires 20 percent or more of the Company's voting securities; (ii) a majority
of the Company's directors are replaced during a two-year period; or (iii)
shareholders approve certain mergers, or a liquidation, or sale of the Company's
assets. In the event that any payments made in connection with a change in
control would be subjected to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the
Code, the Company would reduce each such executive's severance payment as
necessary so that no portion thereof would be subject to the excise tax. If,
upon a change of control of the Company, the Board made all unvested stock
options immediately exercisable, and an executive's severance payment was
thereby increased above 2.99 times the executive's base amount, the Company is
obligated to pay any additional tax for which the executive would otherwise be
responsible.

17
<PAGE>

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER MATTERS

The non-employee directors of the Company receive an annual cash retainer of
$26,000 per year. Non-employee directors who serve on one Board committee or
more (other than the Executive Committee) receive an additional annual fee of
$4,000 for such service. In addition, non-employee directors who chair a Board
committee receive an additional $2,000 per year, per committee. Directors who
are employees of the Company receive no retainers for Board-related service.

The non-employee directors of the Company also receive a fee of $1,500 for
attending each Board meeting, committee meeting, Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
for each day of a visit by the Board to a plant or office of the Company or its
subsidiaries, and for attending any other business meeting to which the director
is invited by the Board or the Executive Committee. Directors who are employees
of the Company receive no fees for attending any such meeting.

Non-Employee Directors Cash Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the cash compensation paid to and/or deferred
by (at the director's election) each of the non-employee directors of the
Company during 1993.

Cash
Name of Individual Compensation
- ------------------ ------------
M. Anthony Burns ...................... $54,000
William J. Crowe, Jr. ................. 51,000
Grace J. Fippinger .................... 51,000
Constance J. Horner(1) ................ 70,500
Stanley O. Ikenberry(2) ............... 69,500
Howard C. Kauffmann(3) ................ 9,833
Thomas G. Labrecque(1) ................ 61,500
James T. Lynn(2) ..................... 69,500
Paul A. Marks ......................... 69,000
John R. Opel(2) ....................... 58,833
Edmund T. Pratt, Jr. .................. 57,500
Franklin D. Raines(4) ................. 20,250
Felix G. Rohatyn ...................... 66,000
Jean-Paul Valles ...................... 54,500

- -----------
(1) Became a director on January 28, 1993.
(2) Chair of a Committee.
(3) Retired as a director on February 25, 1993.
(4) Became a director on August 26, 1993.

In addition to the cash compensation shown above, all non-employee directors
listed above, except Mr. Kauffmann, received 300 shares of restricted Common
Stock of the Company in 1993, pursuant to the Company's Restricted Stock Plan
for Non-Employee Directors. The provisions of this Plan are discussed below.

Benefit Plans for Non-Employee Directors

Under the Pfizer Inc. Nonfunded Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, directors who are not employees of the Company may defer the above
fees. At the director's election, the fees held in his or her account may be
credited either with interest at a specified rate, or with units. The units are
calculated by dividing the amount of the fee by the closing price of the Common
Stock as of the last business day prior to the date that the fees would
otherwise be paid. The units in a director's account are increased by the value
of any distributions on the Common Stock, allocated in accordance with the
number of units in the account. At the time of the director's termination from
the Company, the amount held in his or her account is then payable in cash. The
amount to be paid is determined by multiplying the number of units in the
account by the closing price of the Common Stock as of the last business day
prior to the payment date.

Under the Company's Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
non-employee directors are granted an initial award of 300 restricted shares of
Common Stock upon first becoming a director. Thereafter, each non-employee
director is granted an annual award of 300 such shares as of the date of the
Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders (provided the director will continue to
serve as a director following the meeting). Pursuant to the Plan, restrictions
on shares of Common Stock awarded under the Plan prohibit the sale or transfer
of the shares by the director until six months after he or she ceases to be a
director. Dividends on these shares may also be deferred under the Nonfunded
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Participation in the Plan
is limited to directors who are not employees of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries. The awards under this Plan are made in addition to the directors'
annual cash retainers and meeting attendance fees.

The Company has a Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Under this
Plan, a retiring non-employee director may receive a pension if he or she is at
least 60 years of age at the time of retirement, has served a minimum of five
years on the Board, and his or her age plus years of service equal at least 70.
The pension is an annuity equal to the director's annual cash retainer at the
time of retirement. This annual cash retainer in 1993 was $26,000. The pension
is paid to the director or to his or her survivor for a period of time equal to
the period that the director served on the Board.

In certain circumstances, the Company is obligated to fund trusts established
to secure its obligations to

18
<PAGE>

make payments to its directors under the above benefit plans, programs or
agreements in advance of the time payment is due.

Consulting Agreements

Under a consulting agreement with the Company, Mr. Pratt consults with the
Company on business matters involving the areas of tax, trade and intellectual
property. In return for this advice, the Company is obligated to pay Mr. Pratt
an annual consulting fee, payable monthly. The agreement runs year-to-year and
may be terminated at the end of any year by either the Company or Mr. Pratt on
90 days written notice, or upon the mutual agreement of both parties. In
addition, the Company must reimburse Mr. Pratt for reasonable business expenses
he incurs in connection with the services he provides to the Company under this
agreement.

The amount paid to Mr. Pratt under the agreement for the services he rendered
to the Company during 1993 was $91,666.

Related Transactions

During 1993, the Company engaged the services of Lazard Freres & Co., of
which Mr. Rohatyn is a General Partner and Mr. Lynn is a Senior Advisor. Lazard
Freres & Co. acted as a financial advisor in connection with potential
acquisitions and general corporate matters, as a broker in connection with the
purchase and sale of securities, and as an underwriter in connection with the
sale of securities. In 1994, the Company plans to retain this firm for such
services. In addition, the Pfizer Retirement Annuity Plan is a limited partner
in Corporate Partners, L. P., of which Lazard Freres & Co. is the General
Partner.

During 1993, the Company had the following transactions with The Chase
Manhattan Bank, N.A., of which Mr. Labrecque is Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer: expenditures of $73,580 for letter of credit fees; $58,565 in
administrative and checking account fees for the Pfizer International, Inc.
Employee Loan Program; $3,600 in escrow fees; and $16,126 in fees for
administration of notes and bonds and disbursing interest. The Company received
from The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. $1,695,035 representing income generated
from a $25 million principal amount fixed-to-floating-rate interest swap. In
addition, the Company paid to Chase $1,857,439 relating to a $100 million
principal amount interest rate and currency swap.

In connection with a Transitional Services Agreement the Company had with
Minerals Technologies, Inc. ("MTI") in 1993, the Company made available to MTI,
certain services, including accounts payable and receivable, credit and
collections, payroll implementation, telephone and computer services and use of
office space and services at the Company's corporate headquarters. Dr. Valles is
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MTI. Under this Agreement, MTI paid
approximately $1,251,165 to the Company (for the period ending December 31,
1993). In addition, in 1993, the Company paid $158,697 to MTI for damaged
magnesite pursuant to contractual indemnification obligations.

Also, on April 6, 1993, the Company sold 2.5 million shares of MTI common
stock to MTI at $24.00 per share in a privately negotiated transaction.

The transactions described in this section were entered into by the Company
pursuant to arm's length negotiations in the ordinary course of business and on
terms that the Company believes to be fair.

Additional Information

The directors (other than Ms. Horner, Mr. Labrecque and Mr. Raines) and
certain officers and former directors and officers of the Company are defendants
in a civil suit brought purportedly on behalf of the Company as a shareholder
derivative action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
Orange. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duty and other common law
violations in connection with the manufacture and distribution of Shiley heart
valves and seeks, among other things, unspecified money damages. The defendants
in the action believe that the suit is without merit.

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Executive Compensation Committee

During 1993, the Executive Compensation Committee consisted of Mr. Opel
(Chair), Mr. Burns and Mr. Labrecque, none of whom was an employee of the
Company. Mr. Kauffmann retired from both the Board and this Committee in
February of 1993. Mr. Opel was designated Chair of the Committee in February of
1993. The Committee met seven times in 1993.

The functions of the Executive Compensation Committee are to establish the
salaries and other compensation of the employee-directors and other elected
officers of the Company. The Executive Compensation Committee Report is included
on page 12 of this Proxy Statement.

19
<PAGE>

The Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee consists of Mr. Lynn (Chair), Miss Fippinger and Dr.
Marks, none of whom is an employee of the Company. During 1993 this Committee
met five times. One of the functions of this Committee is to recommend nominees
to the Board to fill vacancies on the Board as they occur and to recommend
candidates for election as directors at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In
carrying out its duties, the Committee will consider for nomination nominees
submitted to the Board by other directors and shareholders, pursuant to the
requirements set forth below. The Nominating Committee also confers with
management concerning management's plans for succession to officer and senior
management positions in the Company. Additional functions include: monitoring
and making recommendations to the Board regarding the memberships and functions
of Board committees and the structure of Board meetings; considering questions
of possible conflicts of interest of Board members; and reviewing the outside
activities of senior executives of the Company.

Recommendations for director nominees must be submitted in writing to the
Secretary of the Company at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017. A
recommendation must be received no later than: (1) 60 days in advance of an
annual meeting if it is being held within 30 days preceding the anniversary date
of the previous year's meeting, or (2) 90 days in advance of such meeting if it
is being held on or after the anniversary date of the previous year's meeting.
With respect to any other annual or special meeting, the recommendation must be
received by the 10th day following the date of public disclosure of the date of
such meeting. The recommendation must contain the following information about
the nominee: name, age, business and residence addresses; principal occupation
or employment; the number of shares of Common Stock held by the nominee; the
information that would be required under the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of
such nominee as a director; and a signed consent of the nominee to serve as a
director of the Company, if elected.

The Audit Committee

The Audit Committee consists of Dr. Ikenberry (Chair), Adm. Crowe, Ms.
Horner, Mr. Raines and Mr. Rohatyn, none of whom is an employee of the Company.
During 1993, the Committee met four times. The functions of the Audit Committee
include the review of the programs of the Company's internal auditors, the
results of their audits, and the adequacy of the Company's system of internal
financial controls and accounting practices; the review, with the independent
auditors, of the scope of their annual audit and estimated audit fees, prior to
its commencement, and of their report and findings, subsequent to its
completion; the review with the independent auditors of the annual and quarterly
financial statements of the Company; the review of Company compliance with the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; the recommendation of independent auditors for
appointment annually by the Board, subject to the approval of the shareholders;
the initiation of such other examinations as the Committee deems advisable with
respect to such matters as the adequacy of the system of internal controls and
the accounting practices of the Company; and the taking of such action as the
Committee finds appropriate with respect to these activities.

ITEM 2 -- APPROVAL OF AUDITORS

The Board, upon the recommendation of its Audit Committee, has appointed KPMG
Peat Marwick to serve as the Company's independent auditors for 1994, subject to
the approval of the shareholders. The firm and its predecessors have audited the
financial records of the Company for many years during which time the practice
of rotating the engagement partner has been followed. The Board considers the
firm to be well qualified.

It is expected that representatives of KPMG Peat Marwick will be present at
the Annual Meeting to answer questions. They also will have the opportunity to
make a statement if they desire to do so.

Total audit fees paid to all independent auditors by the Company for 1993
were approximately $5,621,000, of which $5,397,000 was attributable to KPMG Peat
Marwick.

The affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast on this proposal is required
for the approval of this proposal.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the approval of KPMG Peat
Marwick as independent auditors of the Company for the year 1994.

20
<PAGE>

ITEM 3 -- APPROVAL OF THE PERFORMANCE-CONTINGENT SHARE AWARD PROGRAM

During 1993 the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") was amended with respect to
the tax deductibility of executive compensation. Under the Code, publicly-held
companies such as the Company may not deduct compensation paid to certain
executive officers to the extent that such compensation exceeds $1 million in
any one year for each such officer. The regulations provide an exception for
"performance-based" compensation including stock options granted under a stock
option plan that has been previously approved by shareholders, provided that
such options are not issued below the fair market value of the stock on the date
of the grant. The Company's Stock and Incentive Plan meets these requirements.
Compensation other than stock options, however, must meet other requirements in
order to qualify as tax deductible "performance-based" compensation.

Upon the recommendation of the Executive Compensation Committee, the Board
has decided to take all action that will be required for the
Performance-Contingent Share Award Program, which provides long-term
compensation in conjunction with the Stock and Incentive Plan, to qualify as
"performance-based" compensation under the Code, in order to qualify for a tax
deduction.

Description of the Performance-Contingent Share Award Program

Under the terms of this program, the 200 most highly compensated employees of
the Company are eligible to be granted the opportunity by the Executive
Compensation Committee to earn Performance-Contingent Shares of Company Common
Stock based on the Company's achievement of corporate performance goals over a
five-year period. The corporate performance formula used is comprised of two
performance criteria -- total shareholder return and earnings per share --
measured over the applicable performance period relative to the Peer Group. In
1993, eight employees received such awards and the intention is to limit the
number of participants to a small percent of the eligible employees. In order to
introduce this new program in 1993, the awards for shorter performance periods
were made so that the employees receiving the awards may also earn
Performance-Contingent Shares over two, three and four years. All future awards
under this program, however, will have a five-year performance period.

The total number of shares awarded under the program is limited to 10 million
shares. In addition, no eligible employee will be granted Performance-Contingent
Share Awards for more than 100,000 shares of Company Common Stock in any year.
Actual awards will generally be a fraction of the maximum and will be correlated
with awards under the Stock and Incentive Plan.

This program is discussed in further detail in the Executive Compensation
Committee Report on page 12 of this Proxy Statement. The text of the program is
included in this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A. The market value of the Company's
Common Stock as of February 28, 1994 was $57.94.

Performance-Contingent Share Awards

As discussed above, awards under the Performance-Contingent Share Award
Program are based on the long-term performance of the Company. No shares have
yet been earned by any employee of the Company since the requisite performance
periods have not yet passed. Under the regulations of the SEC, however, the
Company is required to show in the table below the shares that would have been
earned by the individuals and groups indicated using the performance criteria
established for the program and based upon the performance of the Company in
1993. Thus the "awards" shown below were not actually made to, or earned by, any
Company employee and are entirely hypothetical, but are based on the shares that
may be earned for the 1993-1997 period as shown in the Long-Term Incentive Plan
table shown on Page 11 of this Proxy Statement.

Number of
Name and Position Shares
----------------- ---------
William C. Steere, Jr.
Chairman/CEO ......................... 15,000
E.C. Bessey
Vice Chairman; President, U.S.
Pharmaceuticals Group ................ 5,400
H. McKinnell, Jr.
Executive V.P. & CFO;
President-- HPG ....................... 5,400
R. Neimeth
Executive V.P.; President --
International Pharmaceuticals Group .. 4,500
J. F. Niblack
Executive V.P.-- Research
and Development ....................... 4,500
Executive Group ........................ 77,400
Non-Executive Director Group............. none
Non-Executive Officer
Employee Group ....................... none

Requirements for Tax Deductibility

Performance-Contingent Share Awards granted in 1994 and thereafter will be
deductible under the Code if: (1) such shares are paid solely on account of the
attainment of one or more preestablished objective performance goals; (2) the
performance goals under which the shares are to be paid are established by a

21
<PAGE>

committee comprised solely of two or more outside directors; (3) the Executive
Compensation Committee certifies in writing prior to payment of the shares that
the performance goals and any other material terms of payment were, in fact,
satisfied; and (4) the material terms of the performance goals under which the
shares are to be paid are disclosed to shareholders and subsequently approved by
a majority of the shares of Company Common Stock cast on this proposal at the
Annual Meeting.

In connection with the Performance-Contingent Share Awards granted to Company
employees in 1994 and thereafter, the Executive Compensation Committee will
ensure that the first three requirements listed above will be met. Thus, the
only remaining requirement that must be met before the Company would pay the
Performance-Contingent Shares, and be able to deduct the value of the
Performance-Contingent Shares for tax purposes, is to obtain shareholder
approval of the material terms of the Performance-Contingent Share Award
Program.

Accordingly, the Board submits the following resolution for shareholder
approval:

RESOLVED, that the Performance-Contingent Share Award Program, as set forth
in Exhibit A hereto, is hereby approved.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the
Performance-Contingent Share Award Program.

ITEM 4 -- SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL RELATING TO STOCK OPTION
GRANTS TO EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Edward C. Peterson of 319 Douglass Drive, Douglassville, PA 19518, owner of
800 shares of Common Stock, has asked that the following resolution, which he
intends to introduce at the Annual Meeting, and the reasons in support of the
resolution be set forth in this Proxy Statement:

"Be it resolved, it is recommended that the Board of Directors arrange that
future contracts for executive officers and directors shall not provide for the
granting of options to purchase stock of the Company and that the Compensation
Committee devise a replacement scheme of incentive awards that will be more
relevant to the Company's performance and in which the goals to be met and the
terms of the payments could be stated in each annual meeting notice."

PROPONENT'S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE RESOLUTION

"While options to purchase the Company's stock are the largest part of its
so-called incentive for executive effort, the fact is that the value of these
options is only related to the Company's performance in a minor way. As the 1993
proxy statement showed, the value of the S & P 500 doubled in the previous 5
years, so with average performance, the value of the Company's stock would
probably have doubled. The options are mostly a risk-free option to gamble on a
mostly always rising market."

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THIS RESOLUTION

The Board opposes this proposal because it asks the Board to do something it
believes it already has done -- to "devise...a scheme of incentive
awards...relevant to the Company's performance." As discussed at length in the
Executive Compensation Committee Report included on page 12 of this Proxy
Statement, the Board adopted a revised executive compensation program in 1993.
The objectives of the program are twofold: to retain executives who have
contributed to the Company's success by insuring they are paid competitively and
to tie executive compensation more closely to the Company's performance. A
significant part of the program is the long-term incentive awards consisting of
stock option grants with ten-year terms and Performance-Contingent Share Awards
which may be earned by the Named Executive Officers over a five-year period
provided the requisite performance goals are first met.

If implemented, the proposal would require the Company to stop issuing stock
options to all of its executive officers under the Company's Stock and Incentive
Plan which was approved by the Company's shareholders in 1965. The Board
believes that the Stock and Incentive Plan has been of substantial value in
securing the continued service of employees, in stimulating their efforts toward
the continuing success of the Company and in assisting the Company to recruit
personnel with outstanding abilities. The Board also views stock options as a
critical part of its executive compensation program.

22
<PAGE>

The Board also believes that stock options are not "risk free" as the
proponent states in his proposal. As noted above, stock options are granted as
part of, and not in addition to, total compensation paid to Company employees.
The option prices under the Plan may not be less than the fair market value of
the Company's Common Stock on the date the options are granted. If the Company
does not perform well, therefore, the stock price is more likely to decrease and
the executive will lose part of his or her compensation because the options will
not increase in value. If the Company does perform well, however, the stock
price is more likely to increase thereby adding value to the options. Stock
options create an important link, therefore, between executive compensation and
shareholder value. The implementation of the proposal would force the Board to
forego making stock option awards to Company executives which it deems to be an
important part of the Company's incentive compensation program.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote "AGAINST" the above
resolution relating to stock option grants made to executive officers.

ITEM 5 -- SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Murray Katz and Beatrice M. Katz of 11435 Monterrey Drive, Silver Spring, MD
20902, as owners of 1,294 shares of Common Stock, have asked that the following
resolution, which one or both of them intend to introduce at the Annual Meeting
and the reasons in support of the resolution be set forth in this Proxy
Statement.

"Resolved, that the shareholders of Pfizer Inc. recommend that the Board of
Directors take the necessary steps to institute a salary and compensation
ceiling such that as to future employment contracts, no senior executive officer
or director of the Company receive combined salary and other compensation which
is more than two times the salary provided to the President of the United
States, that is more than $400,000."

PROPONENTS' STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE RESOLUTION

"REASONS: There is no corporation which exceeds the size and complexity of
operation of the government of the United States of which the President is the
chief executive officer. Even most government agencies far exceed the size, as
measured by personnel and budget, of most private corporations. The President of
the United States now receives a salary of $200,000; even heads of agencies and
members of Congress are paid only somewhat in excess of $100,000. The
recommended ceiling is sufficient to motivate any person to do his best.

While the duties of the President of the United States are not comparable to
those of senior executive officers or directors (the President has a much more
demanding job), and while the President has many valuable compensations, we use
the salary of the President only as a reference point for the shareholders to
consider as they evaluate this resolution.

Officers of public corporations are the employees and not the owners, except
as they may be shareholders in common with other stockholders. Yet, officers
give the appearance that they run the corporations primarily for their benefit
rather than for the benefit of the shareholders. Thus, they may drain away
millions of dollars in salary, stock options and other compensation. When more
than the recommended ceiling on salary and compensation is taken, this is an
expression of greed and abuse of power.

Usually, there is no direct correlation between the profitability of a
corporation and the compensation to officers. In fact, in many corporations,
compensation increases even as profits fall. It is apparent that high
compensation does not usually serve as an incentive for a better run or more
profitable corporation. Obscene compensation packages illustrate the power of
the Board of Directors, a closed group which perpetuates itself, by determining
who is to be selected to the Board and who is to be an officer of the company,
as well as the compensation to be received. The Board of Directors does not own
the corporation, but it can run the corporation as if it were their property.
There is a general consensus in the United States that corporate officials are
grossly overpaid and that this state of affairs is promulgated by the policy of
Boards of Directors. There is no shortage of qualified people who would gladly
step in and do as good a job as the incumbent officers of the Corporation and
who would have no hesitation serving within the aforementioned pay ceiling.

Any officer who believes he can better the corporation should be sufficiently
motivated to purchase stock on the open market or to receive stock options as
part of his salary and compensation package. To remain competitive in world
markets we must cut our costs and not overcompensate directors and officers.

"If you AGREE, please mark your proxy FOR this resolution."

23
<PAGE>

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THIS RESOLUTION

The Board believes that the proposal to establish an absolute ceiling on all
compensation payable to the Company's senior officers and directors is not in
the best interests of the Company or its stockholders for a number of very
important reasons. First and foremost, such a ceiling would place the Company at
a severe competitive disadvantage in attracting, motivating and retaining senior
management talent which the Company requires to be successful in its industry.

In addition, the Board believes that the proponent's resolution is
self-defeating in that it seeks to place a cap on all senior executive officers'
"combined salary and other compensation", which would include long-term
performance-based compensation. As is more fully described in the Report of the
Executive Compensation Committee on page 12 of this Proxy Statement, the Company
has in place a long-term compensation program that is designed to reward its
executives for achieving corporate and individual performance goals. Thus,
contrary to the proponent's assertion that "[u]sually there is no direct
correlation between the profitability of a corporation and the compensation to
officers" the Company's compensation program does tie executive compensation to
corporate performance. To impose an arbitrary ceiling on compensation would
severely undermine the incentive nature of the program. Also, since the salary
of the President is established by Congress, the proposal would, in essence,
delegate to Congress important compensation decisions reserved by law to the
Board. This makes poor business sense because it would limit the ability of the
Board to make compensation decisions critical to the success of the Company.

Moreover, the proponent's analogy between the salaries and duties of the
President of the United States and senior executive officers of publicly held
corporations is inappropriate. The compensation structure of the office of the
President is very different from that of a corporate employee. Different factors
go into setting the cash compensation of the President that are not considered
in the corporate context. Thus, the compensation ceiling recommended by the
proponent is unrealistic and not in the best interest of the Company or its
shareholders.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote "AGAINST" the above
resolution relating to executive compensation.

THE COMPANY'S STATEMENT ON SOUTH AFRICA

The Company received a proposal that it endorse a "Code of Conduct for
Business Operating in South Africa." The Proposal was withdrawn on the
understanding that the following statement would be included in this Proxy
Statement.

The Company has for many years operated its business throughout the world in
accordance with its own Policies on Business Conduct. The Company believes that
these policies, which are applicable to its worldwide business, address the
social concerns in South Africa. They are generally consistent with the Code of
Conduct for Business Operating in South Africa developed by the South African
Council of Churches and endorsed by other South African organizations. The
Company will continue to abide by its policies as it operates in South Africa
and in so doing will operate in a manner generally consistent with the standards
promulgated by the Code of Conduct. The Company acts as a responsible corporate
citizen wherever it operates. This will continue to be its practice in South
Africa as that country continues to establish itself as a democratic state.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Section 16") requires
that reports of beneficial ownership of Common Stock and changes in such
ownership be filed with the SEC by the Company's directors and executive
officers. The Company is required to conduct a review and to identify in its
proxy statement each director or officer who failed to file any required reports
under Section 16 on a timely basis. Based upon that review, the Company has
determined that in November, 1992 Mr. P. S. Miller made a family gift which was
reported in 1993 on an amended Form 5. To the Company's knowledge, all Section
16 reporting requirements applicable to its directors and executive officers
were complied with for fiscal year 1993.

24
<PAGE>

QUORUM AND TABULATION OF VOTES

The By-laws of the Company (the "By-laws") provide that a majority of the
shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, present in
person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of shareholders of
the Company.

Votes at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by two independent judges of
election appointed by the Company. Shares of Common Stock represented by a
properly signed and returned proxy are considered as present at the Annual
Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum.

Pursuant to the By-laws, directors of the Company must be elected by a
plurality vote. In the event that more than two candidates run for the same
office, a plurality vote ensures that the person elected will be the one who
receives the greatest number of votes, even if that number does not constitute a
majority of the votes cast. Pursuant to the By-laws, all other questions shall
be determined by a majority of the votes cast thereon, except as may otherwise
be provided in the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company or by law.

Brokers holding shares for beneficial owners must vote those shares according
to the specific instructions they receive from the owners. If specific
instructions are not received, however, brokers may vote these shares in their
discretion, depending on the type of proposal involved. However, the New York
Stock Exchange can preclude brokers from exercising their voting discretion on
certain proposals. Absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner in
such a case, the broker may not vote on that proposal. This results in what is
known as a "broker non-vote" on such a proposal. A "broker non-vote" has the
effect of a negative vote when a majority of the shares issued and outstanding
is required for approval of the proposal. A "broker non-vote" has no effect when
a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote or a majority of the votes
cast is required for approval of the proposal.

Directors will be elected by a favorable vote of a plurality of the shares of
Common Stock present and entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, at the Annual
Meeting. Votes "withheld" from director-nominee(s) will not count against the
election of such nominee(s). Brokers have discretionary authority to vote on
this proposal.

Passage of the proposal to approve the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick
(Item 2) and the shareholder proposals (Items 4 and 5) requires the approval of
a majority of the votes cast on these proposals. Abstentions as to these
proposals will not count as votes cast "for" or "against" these proposals, and
will not be included in calculating the number of votes necessary for approval
of these proposals. Passage of the proposal to approve the
Performance-Contingent Share Award Program (Item 3) requires the approval of a
majority of the shares present or represented at the meeting and entitled to
vote. Absentions with respect to Item 3 will count as being present or
represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, and will be included in
calculating the number of votes necessary for approval of the proposal. The New
York Stock Exchange determines whether brokers have discretionary authority to
vote on a given proposal.

If a properly signed proxy form is returned to the Company by a shareholder
of record and is not marked, it will be voted in accordance with the
recommendations of the Board on all proposals.

The enclosed proxy may be revoked by the shareholder at any time before it is
voted by the submission of a written revocation to the Company, by the return of
a subsequently dated proxy to the Company, or by the shareholder's personal vote
at the Annual Meeting.

The Board is not aware of any matters that are expected to come before the
Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement. If any
other matter should come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the
accompanying proxy intend to vote such proxies in accordance with their best
judgment.

MISCELLANEOUS

Under the rules of the SEC, shareholder proposals intended to be presented
at the 1995 Annual Meeting must be received by the Company at its principal
executive offices by November 17, 1994 for inclusion in the proxy statement and
form of proxy relating to that meeting.

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to
the solicitation of proxies by the use of the mails, the Company may use
telephone, telegraph and personal contact. Such solicitation will be made by
regular employees of the Company without additional compensation for such
services. The Company has also engaged Morrow & Co., Inc. to assist in the proxy
solicitation, and has agreed to pay $25,000 plus expenses for such soliciting
services.

By order of the Board,

/s/ C. L. Clemente
------------------
C. L. Clemente
Secretary

25
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT A

PFIZER INC.

PERFORMANCE-CONTINGENT SHARE AWARD PROGRAM

PURPOSE: The Performance-Contingent Share Award Program is designed to
promote the retention of key employees, to compensate such employees based on
the Company's achievement of corporate performance goals and to optimize
employee motivation. The Program emphasizes long-term compensation values over
short-term pay opportunities and encourages stock retention by the Company's key
employees in the face of stock market fluctuations.

DEFINITIONS:

Committee -- the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of the Company.

Company -- Pfizer Inc.

Peer Group -- an industry peer index compiled by the Company that consists of
the following companies: Abbott Laboratories, American Cynamid Co., American
Home Products Corp., Baxter International Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company,
Colgate-Palmolive Co., Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck and Co.,
Inc., Schering Plough Corp., Upjohn Co. and Warner-Lambert Company.

Performance-Contingent Shares -- shares of the Company's common stock that
may be awarded under this Program to eligible employees of the Company. For
shares to be issued to any such employee, however, certain preestablished
Company performance criteria must be met.

Program -- the Performance-Contingent Share Award Program.

ELIGIBILITY: The 200 most highly compensated employees of the Company are
eligible to be granted the opportunity by the Committee to earn
Performance-Contingent Shares based upon the Company's achievement of
predetermined corporate performance goals over a five-year period except for the
1993 awards which provide for shorter performance periods.

PARTICIPATION: The Committee shall select an eligible employee for
participation under the Program by delivering to such employee, prior to the
start of the applicable five-year performance period, an award letter that
specifies the objective performance goal and the number of
Performance-Contingent Shares solely payable upon the attainment of such goal.

AWARD OF PERFORMANCE-CONTINGENT SHARES: The total number of shares to be
awarded under the Program is limited to 10 million shares. No eligible employee
will be granted Performance-Contingent Shares for more than 100,000 shares of
the Company's common stock in any year. Actual awards will generally be a
fraction of the maximum and will be correlated with awards under the Company's
Stock and Incentive Plan. The maximum number of Performance-Contingent Shares to
be awarded will be determined by the Committee each year prior to the start of
the corporate performance period and shall be set forth in the award letter
provided to each eligible employee. Except for the 1993 awards, the awards
hereunder will be based upon a five-year performance period.

DETERMINATION OF CORPORATE PERFORMANCE FORMULA: Awards of Performance-
Contingent Shares are determined by a preestablished, non-discretionary formula
comprised of two performance criteria -- total shareholder return (including
reinvestment of dividends) and earnings per share (as reported) -- measured
point-to-point over the applicable performance period relative to the Peer
Group. The targets under the performance formula shall be established by the
Committee before the start of the performance period. The performance formula
weighs each criterion equally. To the extent that the Company's performance
exceeds the low end of the range of performance of the Peer Group in either or
both of the performance criteria, a varying amount of shares up to the maximum
will be earned, all as set forth in the award letter.

An interim phase-in period applies to the 1993 awards and is designed to
account for shorter performance periods within the full five-year period. The
1993 awards will be pro-rated as follows: 1993-94 -- 40% of awards; 1993-95 --
60% of awards; 1993-96 -- 80% of awards; and 1993-97 -- 100% of awards. Awards
made in 1994 and thereafter will be paid in the year following the final year of
the five-year period.

ADMINISTRATION OF THE PROGRAM: The Program is administered by the Committee
(consisting solely of two or more outside directors, within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
disinterested directors within

1
<PAGE>

the meaning of Section 16b-3(c)(2)(i) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended). In addition to preestablishing the targets under the performance
formula and the number of shares awardable to each participant, the Committee
must certify in writing prior to payment of the shares that the performance
goals and other material terms of payment were, in fact, satisfied.

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT: If a Program participant is not employed at the
end of the performance period due to death, disability or termination of
employment following a Change in Control, as defined under the Pfizer Stock and
Incentive Plan, a determination of shares payable, if any, to the Program
participant or his or her estate will be made on the basis of the Company's
performance during the full calendar years of the performance period that elapse
before the employee's termination of employment. The number of
Performance-Contingent Shares to be awarded shall be determined by multiplying
the Performance-Contingent Shares otherwise awardable by a fraction, the
numerator of which is the number of years completed during the performance
period before termination of employment (whole or partial), and the denominator
of which is five.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECURITIES LAWS: With respect to eligible employees subject
to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, transactions
under the Program are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule
16b-3 or its successors under the 1934 Act. To the extent any provision of the
Program or action by the Program administrators involving such eligible
employees is deemed not to comply with an applicable condition of Rule 16b-3,
such provision or action shall be deemed null and void as to such eligible
employees, to the extent permitted by law and deemed advisable by the Program
administrators.

Moreover, in the event the Program does not include a provision required by
Rule 16b-3 to be stated therein, such provision (other than one relating to
eligibility requirements or the price and amount of awards as applicable) shall
be deemed automatically to be incorporated by reference into the Program insofar
as eligible employees subject to Section 16 are concerned, with such
incorporation to be deemed effective as of the effective date of such Rule 16b-3
provision.

AMENDMENT OF PROGRAM: The material provisions of the Program may only be
amended by the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company present, or
represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting duly held in accordance with the
laws of the State of Delaware.

APPROVAL OF PROGRAM: The material terms of the Program are subject to
approval by the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company present, or
represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting duly held in accordance with the
laws of the State of Delaware.

2
<PAGE>

DRIVING DIRECTIONS TO PFIZER CENTRAL RESEARCH
Eastern Point Road
Groton, Connecticut 06340

FROM WEST (New York City) (Driving time approximately 3 hours)

I-95 North (New England Thruway) to New London. Follow I-95 across Thames River
(Gold Star Bridge).

Exit 87 (Rt. 349) onto Clarence B. Sharp Memorial Highway. Proceed on Sharp
Highway to second overhead traffic light.

Turn right onto Rainville Avenue. Proceed to next overhead traffic light.

Turn left onto Benham Road. Proceed to where Benham Road and Eastern Point Road
merge -- City of Groton Fire Station will be on left -- then turn left into
Pfizer's Central Research North Gate. Pfizer personnel will direct you to
parking and the meeting area.

FROM NORTH (HARTFORD) (Driving time approximately 1 hour and 15 minutes)

I-91 South toward New York

Exit 22S (Cromwell/Middletown) onto Rt. 9 (left hand exit).

Exit to I-95 North toward New London (left hand exit at Old Saybrook). Continue
on I-95 crossing the Connecticut River in Old Saybrook and the Thames River in
New London.

Exit 87 (Rt. 349) onto Clarence B. Sharp Memorial Highway. Proceed on Sharp
Highway to second overhead traffic light.

Turn right onto Rainville Avenue. Proceed to next overhead traffic light.

Turn left onto Benham Road. Proceed to where Benham Road and Eastern Point Road
merge -- City of Groton Fire Station will be on the left -- then turn left into
Pfizer's Central Research North Gate. Pfizer personnel will direct you to
parking and the meeting area.

FROM EAST (PROVIDENCE) (Driving time approximately 1 hour)

I-95 South (toward New York).

Exit 87 (Rt. 349) left hand exit onto Clarence B. Sharp Memorial Highway.
Proceed on Sharp Highway to second overhead traffic light.

Turn right onto Rainville Avenue. Proceed to next overhead traffic light.

PLEASE BE SURE TO ALLOW AMPLE TIME FOR PARKING AND REGISTERING
FOR THE MEETING! DOORS TO THE REGISTRATION BUILDING WILL OPEN AT 8:30 A.M.

<PAGE>

(Map of meeting site area)

Please see reverse side for driving directions.

<PAGE>

PFIZER INC., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017-5755

PROXY FORM

Solicited by the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
April 28, 1994, 10 A.M. at Pfizer Inc. Central Research, Eastern Point Road
Groton, CT

The undersigned hereby appoints William C. Steere, Jr., Henry A. McKinnell,
Jr. and C.L. Clemente, and each of them, as Proxies, each with full power of
substitution, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and to vote, as
designated below on this form, all the shares of Common Stock of Pfizer Inc.
held of record by the undersigned on February 28, 1994, at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on April 28, 1994, or any adjournment thereof.

If no other indication is made, the Proxies shall vote FOR Items 1, 2 and 3
and AGAINST Items 4 and 5 and in their discretion upon such other business as
may properly come before the meeting.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote
"FOR" Items 1, 2 and 3
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Election of directors. Nominees:

M. Anthony Burns, Stanley O. Ikenberry and Franklin D. Raines.

/_/ FOR all nominees, except vote withheld from
the following nominees (if any):

-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

/_/ Vote WITHHELD from all Nominees

2. A proposal to approve the FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
appointment of KPMG Peat /_/ /_/ /_/
Marwick as independent auditors.

3. A proposal to approve the FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Performance-Contingent Share Award Program. /_/ /_/ /_/

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors Recommends a vote
"AGAINST" Items 4 and 5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. A shareholder proposal FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
relating to stock /_/ /_/ /_/
option grants to executive officers.

5. A shareholder proposal FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
relating to executive compensation. /_/ /_/ /_/

IF ACTING AS ATTORNEY, EXECUTOR, TRUSTEE OR IN OTHER
REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY, PLEASE SIGN NAME AND TITLE.

-------------------------------- -----/--/94
(Signature of Shareholder) Date

-------------------------------- -----/--/94
(Signature if Held Jointly) Date

---------------------------------------------------
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
---------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------

Please sign
and return
this proxy form.
Thank you