- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
For the transition period from...............to...............
Commission file number 0-14250
ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME
PROGRAM II - 7, L.P.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Texas 76-0163130
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
800 Rockmead Drive
Three Kingwood Place
Kingwood, Texas 77339
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (713) 358-8401
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Limited Partnership Interest
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will
be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.[x]
State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $351,842
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold,
or the average bid and asked prices of such stock as of a specified date within
the past 60 days (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act):
Not Applicable
Documents Incorporated By Reference:
None
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-KSB ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II-7, L.P.
Item No. Part I Page
- -------- ------- ----
1 Description of Business I-1
2 Description of Property I-3
3 Legal Proceedings I-5
4 Submission of Matters to a Vote
of Security Holders I-5
Part II
------------
5 Market for Common Equity and
Related Security Holder Matters II-1
6 Management's Discussion and Analysis
or Plan of Operation II-2
7 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data II-3
8 Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants
on Accounting and Financial Disclosure II-13
Part III
---------------
9 Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and
Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act III-1
10 Executive Compensation III-3
11 Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management III-4
12 Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions III-4
13 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K III-4
Signatures S-1
<PAGE>
PART I
Item 1. Description of Business
General
Enex Oil & Gas Income Program II-7, L.P. (the "Company") was
formed under the Uniform Limited Partnership Act of the State of Texas on March
19, 1985 and commenced operations on July 16, 1985 with aggregate subscriptions
of $4,434,757, $4,390,409 of which was received from 560 limited partners,
including investors whose distributions from earlier partnerships sponsored by
the Company's general partner, Enex Resources Corporation ("Enex"), were
automatically invested in the Company.
The Company is engaged in the oil and gas business through the
ownership of various interests in producing oil and gas properties. If
warranted, the Company may further develop its oil and gas properties. However,
the Company does not intend to engage in significant drilling activities. Such
activities may be conducted, however, as an incidental part of the management of
producing properties or with a view toward enhancing the value of producing
properties. In no event will the Company engage in exploratory drilling, or use
any of the limited partners' net subscriptions to fund drilling activities. Any
developmental drilling will be financed primarily through third party borrowing
or with funds provided from operations. The expenses of drilling, completing and
equipping and operating development wells are allocated 90% to the limited
partners and 10% to the general partner. See Note 1 to the Financial Statements
for information relating to the allocation of costs and revenues between the
limited partners and the general partner. The Company's operations are
concentrated in a single industry segment.
The principal executive office of the Company is maintained at Suite 200,
Three Kingwood Place, Kingwood, Texas 77339. The telephone number at this office
is (713) 358-8401. The Company has no regional offices.
The Company has no employees. On March 1, 1996, Enex and its subsidiaries
employed 24 persons.
Marketing
The marketing of oil and gas produced by the Company is
affected by a number of factors which are beyond the Company's control, the
exact nature of which cannot be accurately predicted. These factors include the
quantity and price of crude oil imports, fluctuating supply and demand, pipeline
and other transportation facilities, the marketing of competitive fuels, state
and federal regulation of oil and gas production and distribution and other
matters affecting the availability of a ready market. All of these factors are
extremely volatile.
Amoco Production Company and Exxon Company, U.S.A. accounted
for 24% and 13%, respectively, of the Company's total sales in 1995. Amoco
Production Company and Exxon Company, USA accounted for 23% and 13%,
respectively, of the Company's sales in 1994. No other purchaser individually
accounted for more than 10% of such sales. Although the Company marketed a
significant portion of its sales to the above noted companies, such a
concentration does not pose a significant risk due to the commodity nature of
the Company's products.
I-1
<PAGE>
Environmental and Conservation Regulation
State regulatory authorities in the states in which the Company
owns producing properties are empowered to make and enforce regulations to
prevent waste of oil and gas and to protect correlative rights and opportunities
to produce oil and gas as between owners of a common reservoir. Each of such
regulatory authorities also regulates the amount of oil and gas produced by
assigning allowable rates of production, which may be increased or decreased in
accordance with supply and demand. Requirements regarding the prevention and
clean-up of pollution and similar environmental matters are also generally
applicable. The costs, if any, the Company may incur in this regard cannot be
predicted.
The existence of such regulations has had no material adverse
effects on the Company's operations to date, and the cost of compliance has not
yet been material. There are no material administrative or judicial proceedings
arising under such laws or regulations pending against the Company. The Company
is unable to assess or predict the impact that compliance with environmental and
pollution control laws and regulations may have on its future operations,
capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
Tax Laws
The operations of the Company are affected by the federal
income tax laws contained in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"). Under the Code, generally, the Company will report income from the sale
of oil and gas, against which it may deduct its ordinary business expenses,
depletion, depreciation and intangible drilling and development costs.
It is anticipated that most of the Company's income, if any,
will be from a "passive activity" for purposes of the Code. A passive activity
includes an activity in which the taxpayer does not materially participate,
including the ownership of a limited partnership interest, such as an interest
in the Company. "Passive income," however, does not include portfolio income
(i.e. dividends, interest, royalties, etc.). Although taxpayers generally may
not deduct losses or use tax credits derived from passive activities in an
amount greater than their income derived from such activities, if and to the
extent that the Company generates passive income, it will be available to offset
the limited partners' passive losses from other sources.
Partnerships with interests that are "publicly traded" are
taxed as corporations unless at least 90% of their income is "qualifying
income." Because the Company's income will be qualifying income for this
purpose, the Company will not be taxed as a corporation under this rule. Passive
income or losses from publicly traded partnerships that are not taxed as
corporations generally cannot be used to offset passive income or losses from
other sources. Enex believes that the Company is not publicly traded.
Consequently, limited partners should continue to be able to utilize their
income and loss from the Company to offset losses and income from their other
passive activities.
In order to prevent the adverse tax consequences that would
affect the limited partners if the Company's limited partnership interests were
to become publicly traded in the future, the general partner may, after final
regulations have been issued by the Internal Revenue Service, submit to a vote
of limited partners a proposal to amend the Company's agreement of limited
partnership to provide, among other things, (a) that Enex shall have the right
to refuse to recognize any transfer of limited partnership interests if it
believes that such transfer occurred on a secondary market or the substantial
equivalent
I-2
<PAGE>
thereof; and (b) that all assignors and assignees of the limited partnership
interests shall be required to represent to Enex that any transfer of limited
partnership interests did not, to the best of their knowledge, occur on a
secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof.
Item 2. Description of Property
Presented below is a summary of the Company's property
acquisitions.
The NEWPORT acquisition consists of five wells in Terry,
Wheeler and Hardeman Counties, Texas. The Company's interests were acquired in
July 1985 for a purchase price of $169,125.
The HANSON acquisition consists of working interests in 34
wells in ten counties in South Texas and Southeast Texas. The Company acquired
its interests effective in February 1986 for $976,000.
The Company's interest in the IBERIA acquisition, which
consists of 100% of the working interest in the Edwin L. Bernard lease in Iberia
Field, Iberia Parish, Louisiana, was acquired effective in September 1986 for
$324,211. Enex operated this four-well lease.
The CONCORD acquisition consists of working interests and
royalty interests in more than 10,600 wells in 137 counties in Texas, with very
minor interests in 12 other states. The Company acquired its interests effective
January 1987 for $2,391,089.
Effective August 1990, the Company sold its interest in a small
field in the Concord acquisition (the North Robertson Unit) for $32,407
resulting in a net gain of $23,775 to the Company.
Effective June 30, 1992, the Company sold its interest in a
small field in the Concord acquisition (the Spraberry Unit) for $18,326. This
sale resulted in a net gain of $11,026 to the Company.
Effective October 1, 1993, the Company sold its interest in a
small field in the Concord acquisition (the Coleman Ranch Unit) for $37,787.
This sale resulted in a net loss of $3,609 to the Company.
Effective October 1, 1994, the Company acquired additional
working and royalty interests in the Concord acquisition for $16,787 from an
affiliated partnership. The purchase price represents the fair market value as
determined from the receipt of bids solicited from independent third party
companies.
Effective January 1, 1990, the Company sold its interests in
the Newport, Hanson and Iberia Dome acquisitions and acquired additional
interests in the Concord acquisition from an affiliated limited partnership for
$328,019. The sales and purchase prices in each case represented fair market
value as determined by Townes Pressler Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an
independent petroleum engineering consulting firm.
The Company retains working interests ranging from 0.01% to
2.46% of the total Concord acquisition at December 31, 1995. The Concord
acquisition is operated by nearly 100 different oil and gas producers.
Purchase price as used above is defined as the actual contract
price plus finders' fees, if applicable. Miscellaneous acquisition expenses,
subsequent capital items, etc. are not included.
I-3
<PAGE>
Oil and Gas Reserves
For quantitative information regarding the Company's oil and
gas reserves, please see Supplementary Oil and Gas Information and related
tables which follow the Notes to Financial Statements in Item 7 of this report.
The Company has not filed any current oil and gas reserve estimates or included
any such estimates in reports to any federal or foreign governmental authority
or agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Proved oil and gas reserves reported herein are based on
engineering reports prepared by the petroleum engineering consulting firm of H.
J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. The reserves included in this report are estimates
only and should not be construed as exact quantities. Future conditions may
affect recovery of estimated reserves and revenue, and all reserves may be
subject to revision as more performance data become available. The proved
reserves used in this report conform to the applicable definitions promulgated
by the Securities and Exchange Commission. No major discovery or other favorable
or adverse event that could potentially cause a significant change in the
estimated proved reserves has occurred since December 31, 1995.
Net Oil and Gas Production
The following table shows for the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1994, the approximate production attributable to the Company's oil and gas
interests. The figures in the table represent "net production"; i.e., production
owned by the Company and produced to its interest after deducting royalty and
other similar interests. All production occurred in the United States.
1995 1994
---- ----
Crude oil and condensate (Bbls)......... 19,711 18,876
Natural gas (Mcf)....................... 26,849 22,710
The following table sets forth the Company's average sales
price per barrel of oil, per Mcf of gas, and average production cost per unit
produced for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994.
1995 1994
---- ----
Average sales price per barrel of oil............ $ 15.67 $ 15.22
Average sales price per Mcf of gas............... 1.60 1.76
Average production cost per equivalent
barrel of production.......................... 4.91 4.38
I-4
<PAGE>
Current Activities
The Company completed its acquisition phase in 1987. The
primary focus of present activities is on the efficient management of properties
currently owned.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the
Company is a party.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
I-5
<PAGE>
PART II
Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Security Holder Matters
Market Information
There is no established public trading market for the Company's
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Number of Equity Security Holders
Number of Record Holders
Title of Class (as of March 1, 1996)
--------------- -------------------------
General Partner's Interests 1
Limited Partnership Interests 444
Dividends
The Company made cash distributions to partners of $7 and $13 per
$500 investment in 1995 and 1994, respectively. The payment of future
distributions will depend on the Company's earnings, financial condition,
working capital requirements and other factors, although it is anticipated that
regular quarterly distributions will continue through 1996.
II-1
<PAGE>
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
Results of Operations
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto included in this Form
10-KSB.
Oil and gas sales in 1995 were $351,842 as compared with
$327,333 in 1994. Oil and gas sales increased by $24,509 or 7%. Oil sales
increased by $21,676 or 8%. A 4% increase in oil production caused a $12,806
increase in oil revenues. A 3% increase in the average oil sales price increased
oil revenues by an additional $8,870. Gas sales increased by $2,833 or 7%. An
18% increase in gas production increased gas sales by $7,397. This increase was
partially offset by a 10% decrease in the average gas sales price. The changes
in average oil and gas prices correspond with changes in the overall market for
the sale of oil and gas. The increases in production were primarily due to the
completion of a waterflood project on the Schafter Lake field and the
acquisition of additional interest in the Concord acquisition in the fourth
quarter of 1994.
Lease operating expenses were $102,810 in 1995 and $83,544 in
1994. The increase of $19,266 or 23% from 1994 to 1995 was primarily due to the
increases in production, noted above, and enhanced recovery costs incurred on
the Concord acquisition in 1995.
Depreciation and depletion expense was $134,684 in 1995 as
compared with $177,409 in 1994. This represents a decrease in depletion and
depreciation expense of $42,725 or 24%. A 29% decrease in the depletion rate
reduced depreciation and depletion by $54,656. This decrease was partially
offset by the increases in production, noted above. The decrease in the
depletion rate was primarily the result of an upward revision of the oil and gas
reserves during 1995.
General and administrative expenses were $34,674 in 1995 as
compared with $41,793 in 1994. The decrease of $7,119 or 17% from 1994 to 1995
was primarily the result of less staff time being required to manage the
Company's operations in 1995.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
The Company's cash flow from operations is a direct result of
the amount of net proceeds realized from the sale of oil and gas production.
Accordingly, the changes in cash flow from 1994 to 1995 were primarily due to
the changes in oil and gas sales described above. It is the general partner's
intention to distribute substantially all of the Company's available net cash
flow to the Company's partners. Distributions decreased from 1994 to 1995, due
primarily to the decrease in payable to the general partner of $97,935 in 1995
as compared to a decrease of $33,092 in 1994.
The Company will continue to recover its reserves and
distribute to the partners the net proceeds realized from the sale of oil and
gas production after the payment of debt obligations. The Company plans to repay
the amounts owed to the general partner over a period of three years.
Distribution amounts are subject to change if net revenues are greater or less
than expected. Nonetheless, the general partner believes the Company will
continue to have sufficient cash flow to fund operations and to maintain a
regular pattern of distributions.
At December 31, 1995, the Company had no material commitments
for capital expenditures. The Company does not intend to engage in significant
developmental drilling activity.
II-2
<PAGE>
Item 7. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Enex Oil & Gas Income
Program II-7, L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Enex Oil & Gas Income Program
II-7, L.P. (a Texas limited partnership) as of December 31, 1995 and the related
statements of operations, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the general partner of Enex Oil & Gas
Income Program II-7, L.P. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Enex Oil & Gas Income Program II-7, L.P. at
December 31, 1995 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1995 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
March 18, 1996
II-3
<PAGE>
ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II - 7, L.P.
BALANCE SHEET, DECEMBER 31, 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ASSETS
1995
------------
CURRENT ASSETS:
<S> <C>
Cash $ 12,972
Accounts receivable - oil & gas sales 27,318
Other current assets 7,930
------------
Total current assets 48,220
------------
OIL & GAS PROPERTIES
(Successful efforts accounting method) - Proved
mineral interests and related equipment & facilities 2,935,887
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion 2,117,339
------------
Property, net 818,548
------------
TOTAL $ 866,768
============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable $ 21,932
Payable to general partner 17,699
------------
Total current liabilities 39,631
------------
NONCURRENT PAYABLE TO GENERAL PARTNER 35,398
------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
Limited partners 754,109
General partner 37,630
------------
Total partners' capital 791,739
------------
TOTAL $ 866,768
============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
II-4
<PAGE>
ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II - 7, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
---------- ----------
REVENUES:
<S> <C> <C>
Oil and gas sales $ 351,842 $ 327,333
---------- ----------
EXPENSES:
Depreciation and depletion 134,684 177,409
Lease operating expenses 102,810 83,544
Production taxes 15,845 15,663
General and administrative:
Allocated from general partner 29,430 35,086
Direct expense 5,244 6,707
---------- ----------
Total expenses 288,013 318,409
---------- ----------
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 63,829 8,924
OTHER EXPENSE:
Interest expense to general partner (112) -
---------- ----------
NET INCOME $ 63,717 $ 8,924
========== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II-5
<PAGE>
ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II - 7, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PER $500
LIMITED
PARTNER
GENERAL LIMITED UNIT OUT-
TOTAL PARTNER PARTNERS STANDING
---------- --------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 1994 $ 891,597 $ 37,630 $ 853,967 $ 97
CASH DISTRIBUTIONS (110,944) - (110,944) (13)
NET INCOME 8,924 - 8,924 1
---------- --------- ---------- -----------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1994 789,577 37,630 751,947 86
CASH DISTRIBUTIONS (61,555) - (61,555) (7)
NET INCOME 63,717 - 63,717 7
---------- --------- ---------- -----------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1995 $ 791,739 $ 37,630 $ 754,109 (1) $ 86
========== ========= ========== ===========
</TABLE>
(1) Includes 2,064 units purchased by the general partner as a limited partner.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
II-6
<PAGE>
ENEX OIL AND GAS INCOME PROGRAM II - 7, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
----------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
<S> <C> <C>
Net income $ 63,717 $ 8,924
----------- ----------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities
Depreciation and depletion 134,684 177,409
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable - oil & gas sales (2,709) (2,355)
Other current assets 2,677 (8,110)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable 11,348 (7,388)
Payable to general partner (97,935) (33,092)
----------- ----------
Total adjustments 48,065 126,464
----------- ----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 111,782 135,388
----------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property additions - development costs (42,125) (17,687)
Acquisition of proved oil & gas properties - (16,787)
---------------------------
Net cash used by investing activities (42,125) (34,474)
----------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash distributions (61,555) (110,944)
----------- ----------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH 8,102 (10,030)
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 4,870 14,900
----------- ----------
CASH AT END OF YEAR $ 12,972 $ 4,870
=========== ==========
Interest paid during the year $ 112 $ -
=========== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II-7
<PAGE>
ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II - SERIES 7, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PARTNERSHIP ORGANIZATION
Enex Oil & Gas Income Program II - 7, L.P. (the "Company"), a
Texas limited partnership, commenced operations on July 16,
1985 for the purpose of acquiring proved oil and gas
properties. Total limited partner contributions were
$4,434,757, of which $44,348 was contributed by Enex Resources
Corporation ("Enex"), the general partner.
In accordance with the partnership agreement, the Company paid
commissions of $420,681 for solicited subscriptions to Enex
Securities Corporation, a subsidiary of Enex, and reimbursed
Enex for organization expenses of approximately $133,000.
Information relating to the allocation of costs and revenues
between Enex, as general partner, and the limited partners is
as follows:
Limited
Enex Partners
------- -----------
Commissions and selling expenses 100%
Company reimbursement of organization
expense 100%
Company property acquisition 100%
General and administrative costs 10% 90%
Costs of drilling and completing
development wells 10% 90%
Revenues from temporary investment of
partnership capital 100%
Revenues from producing properties 10% 90%
Operating costs (including general and
administrative costs associated with
operating producing properties) 10% 90%
At the point in time when the cash distributions to the limited
partners equal their subscriptions ("payout"), the costs of
drilling and completing development wells, revenues from
producing properties, general and administrative costs and
operating costs will be allocated 15% to the general partner
and 85% to the limited partners.
In May, 1993, as the aggregate purchase price of the interests
in the Company plus the cumulative distributions to the limited
partners did not equal limited partner subscriptions (the
"Deficiency"), the general partner forfeited its 10% share of
the Company's net revenues. The foregone net revenues will be
allocated to the limited partners until such time as no
Deficiency exists.
II-8
<PAGE>
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Oil and Gas Properties - The Company uses the successful
efforts method of accounting for its oil and gas operations.
Under this method, the costs of all development wells are
capitalized. Capitalized costs are amortized on the
units-of-production method based on estimated total proved
reserves. The acquisition costs of improved oil and gas
properties are capitalized and periodically assessed for
impairment.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be
Disposed Of." This statement requires that long-lived assets
and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the
Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable.
The Company has not determined the effect, if any, on its
financial position or results of operations which may result
from the adoption of this statement in the first quarter of
1996.
Cash Flows - The Company has presented its cash flows using the
indirect method and considers all highly liquid investments
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
General and Administrative Expenses - The Company reimburses
the General Partner for direct costs and administrative costs
incurred on its behalf. Administrative costs allocated to the
Company are computed on a cost basis in accordance with
standard industry practices by allocating the time spent by the
General Partner's personnel among all projects and by
allocating rent and other overhead on the basis of the relative
direct time charges.
Uses of Estimates - The preparation of the financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contigent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could
differ from these estimates.
3. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
General - The Company is not a taxable entity for federal
income tax purposes. Such taxes are liabilities of the
individual partners and the amounts thereof will vary depending
on the individual situation of each partner. Accordingly, there
is no provision for income taxes in the accompanying financial
statements.
II-9
<PAGE>
Set forth below is a reconciliation of net income as reflected in the
accompanying financial statements and net income for federal income tax purposes
for the year ended December 31, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Allocable to
------------------- Per $500 Limited
General Limited Partner Unit
TOTAL Partner Partners Outstanding
--------- --------- -------- ---------------
Net income as reflected in the
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Accompanying financial statements $ 63,717 $ - $63,717 $ 7
Reconciling items:
Intangible drilling costs
capitalized for financial
reporting purposes which
were charged-off for federal
income tax purposes (27,762) - (27,762) (3)
Difference in depreciation and
depletion computed for federal
computed for federal income
income tax purposes and the
amount computed for financial
reporting purposes 4,161 - 4,161 1
--------- --------- -------- ---------------
Net income for federal
income tax purposes $ 40,116 $ - $40,116 $ 5
========= ========= ======== ===============
</TABLE>
Net income for federal income tax purposes is a summation of ordinary income
(loss), portfolio income (loss), cost depletion and intangible drilling costs as
presented in the Company's federal income tax return.
Set forth below is a reconciliation between partners' capital as reflected in
the accompanying financial statements and partners' capital for federal income
tax purposes as of December 31, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Allocable to
---------------------- Per $500 Limited
General Limited Partner Unit
TOTAL Partner Partners Outstanding
---------- --------- ----------- -------------
Partners' capital as reflected
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
accompanying financial statements $ 791,739 $ 37,630 $ 754,109 $ 86
Reconciling items:
Intangible drilling costs
capitalized for financial
reporting purposes which
were charged-off for federal
income tax purposes (209,418) (16,518) (192,900) (22)
Difference in accumulated
depreciation, depletion and
amortization for financial
reporting and federal income
tax purposes (48,556) - (48,556) (5)
Commissions and syndication
fees capitalized for federal
income tax purposes 420,681 - 420,681 47
---------- --------- ----------- -------------
Partners' capital for federal
income tax purposes $ 954,446 $ 21,112 $ 933,334 $ 106
========== ========= =========== =============
</TABLE>
II-10
<PAGE>
4. PAYABLE TO GENERAL PARTNER
The payable to general partner primarily consists of general and
administrative expenses allocated to the Company by Enex during the
Company's start-up phase and for its ongoing operations. The Company
plans to repay the amounts owed to the general partner over a period
of three years.
5. REPURCHASE OF LIMITED PARTNER INTERESTS
In accordance with the partnership agreement, the general partner is
required to purchase limited partner interests (at the option of the
limited partners) at annual intervals beginning after the second
year following the formation of the Company. The purchase price, as
specified in the partnership agreement, is based primarily on
reserve reports prepared by independent petroleum engineers as
reduced by a specified risk factor.
6. SIGNIFICANT PURCHASERS
Amoco Production Company and Exxon Company, U.S.A. accounted for 24%
and 13%, respectively, of the Company's total sales in 1995. Amoco
Production Company and Exxon Company, USA accounted for 23% and 13%,
respectively, of the Company's sales in 1994. No other purchaser
individually accounted for more than 10% of such sales.
7. PROPERTY TRANSACTION
Effective October 1, 1994, the Company acquired additional working
and royalty interests in the Concord acquisition for $16,787 from an
affiliated partnership. The purchase price represents the fair
market value as determined from the receipt of bids solicited from
independent third party companies.
8. NOTE PAYABLE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER
On January 1, 1995, the Company borrowed $7,000 from the general
partner in order to purchase an additional interest in the Concord
acquisition, as discussed in Note 7, above. The resultant note
payable to the general partner bore interest at prime plus
three-fourths of one percent or a weighted average rate of 9.48%. On
March 3, 1995, the note was completely repaid.
II-11
<PAGE>
ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II - 7, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS INFORMATION
FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Proved Oil and Gas Reserve Quantities (Unaudited)
The following presents an estimate of the Company's proved oil and gas reserve
quantities and changes therein for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 1995. Oil reserves are stated in barrels ("BBLS") and natural gas
in thousand cubic feet ("MCF"). The amounts per $500 limited partner unit do not
include a potential 5% reduction after payout. All of the Company's reserves are
located within the United States.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Per $500 Per $500
Limited Natural Limited
Oil Partner Unit Gas Partner Unit
(BBLS) Outstanding (MCF) Outstanding
PROVED DEVELOPED AND
UNDEVELOPED RESERVES:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
January 1, 1994 98,464 11 186,720 21
Revisions of previous estimates 17,960 2 (32,491) (4)
Purchases of minerals in place 1,947 - 2,619 -
Production (18,876) (2) (22,710) (2)
December 31, 1994 99,495 11 134,138 15
Revisions of previous estimates 44,251 5 57,061 7
Production (19,711) (2) (26,849) (3)
December 31, 1995 124,035 14 164,350 19
PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES:
January 1, 1994 98,464 11 186,720 21
December 31, 1994 99,495 11 134,138 15
December 31, 1995 124,035 14 164,350 19
</TABLE>
II-12
<PAGE>
Item 8. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Not Applicable
II-13
<PAGE>
PART III
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Company's sole General Partner is Enex Resources Corporation, a
Delaware corporation. The Company has no Directors or executive officers. The
Directors and executive officers of Enex are:
Gerald B. Eckley. Mr. Eckley, age 69, has served as a Director, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner since its formation in 1979.
He was employed by Shell Oil Company from 1951 to 1967 and served in managerial
capacities from 1959 to 1967. From 1967 to 1969, he was Director of Fund Raising
at the University of Oklahoma and from 1969 to 1971, was Vice President of Land
and Operations for Imperial American Management Company. In 1971, Mr. Eckley was
a petroleum consultant and in 1972-1973 was General Counsel and Executive
Director of the Oil Investment Institute. From 1973 to 1974, he was Manager of
Oil Properties, Inc. and from 1974 to 1976, was Vice President, Land and Joint
Ventures for Petro-Lewis Corporation. From 1977 to August 1979, Mr. Eckley was
President of Eckley Energy, Inc., a company engaged in purchasing and selling
oil and gas properties. Mr. Eckley received an L.L.B. degree from the University
of Oklahoma in 1951 and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Oklahoma in
1970.
William C. Hooper, Jr. Mr. Hooper, age 58, has been a Director of the
General Partner since its formation in 1979 and is a member of the General
Partner's Audit and Compensation and Options Committees. In 1960 he was a staff
engineer in the Natural Gas Department of the Railroad Commission of Texas, with
principal duties involving reservoir units and gas proration. In 1961 he was
employed by the California Company as a Drilling Engineer and Supervisor. In
1963 he was employed as a Staff Engineer by California Research Corporation and
in 1964 rejoined the California Company as a project manager having various
duties involving drilling and reservoir evaluations. In 1966 he was Executive
Vice President for Moran Bros. Inc., coordinating and managing all company
activities, drilling operations, bidding and engineering. From 1970 until the
present, he has been self-employed as a consulting petroleum engineer providing
services to industry and government and engaged in business as an independent
oil and gas operator and investor. From 1975 to 1987 he was also a Director and
President of Verna Corporation, a drilling contractor and service organization.
He received a B.S. degree in Petroleum Engineering in 1960 from the University
of Texas and an M.S. degree in Petroleum Engineering from that same University
in 1961.
Stuart Strasner. Mr. Strasner, age 66, was a Director of the General
Partner from its formation until October of 1986. He was reappointed to the
Board on April 19, 1990 to fill a vacancy. He is a member of the Audit
Committee. He is a professor of business law at Oklahoma City University and was
Dean of the law school at Oklahoma City University from July 1984 until June
1991. Prior to July 1984, Mr. Strasner was an attorney in private practice with
McCollister, McCleary, Fazio and Holliday in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. From 1959
to 1974, he was employed by various banks, bank holding companies and an
insurance company in executive capacities. From 1974 to 1978, he was a
consultant to various corporations such as insurance companies, bank holding
companies and small business investment companies. From 1978 until late 1981, he
was Executive Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association, and from 1981 to 1983
was a Director and President of PRST Enterprises, Inc., a real estate
development company. Mr. Strasner holds an A.B. degree from Panhandle A&M
College, Oklahoma, and a J.D. degree from the University of Oklahoma. He is a
member of the Fellows of the American Bar Association and a member of the
Oklahoma Bar Association. Mr. Strasner is also a director of Health Images,
Inc., a public company which provides fixed site magnetic resonance imaging
("MRI") services.
III-1
<PAGE>
Martin J. Freedman. Mr. Freedman, age 71, was one of the General Partner's
founders and a member of its Board of Directors as well as a board member of
Enex Securities Corporation until June of 1986. He was reappointed to the Board
on April 19, 1990 to fill a vacancy. He is a member of the Compensation and
Options Committee. He is currently President of Freedman Oil & Gas Company,
engaged primarily in the management of its exploration and producing properties,
and the managing partner Martin J. Freedman & Company which has an interest in
approximately one hundred producing oil and/or gas wells. Mr. Freedman is a
lifetime member of the Denver Petroleum Club as well as being a lifetime member
of the Denver Association of Petroleum Landmen. He was an officer and Director
and/or founder of several former private and public companies. Mr. Freedman
entered the oil and gas business in 1954 when he joined Mr. Marvin Davis of the
Davis Oil Company. In 1956, he became President of Central Oil Corporation, a
company engaged in oil and gas exploration. From 1958 on, Mr. Freedman operated
as Martin J. Freedman Oil Properties and was President of Oil Properties, Inc.,
a private corporation. Mr. Freedman attended Long Island University and New York
University. He received a bachelor's degree in Psychology and also attended New
York University's graduate school.
James Thomas Shorney. Mr. Shorney, age 70, has been a Director of the
General Partner since April of 1990 and is a member of the Compensation and
Options Committee. He has been a petroleum consultant and Secretary/Treasurer of
the Shorney Company, a privately held oil and gas exploration company, from 1970
to date. From 1970 to 1976, he also served as a petroleum consultant in Land and
Lease Research Analysis Studies for the GHK Company. He was an oil and gas lease
broker from 1962 to 1970 and employed by Shell Oil Company in the Land
Department from 1954 to 1962. Before joining Shell Oil Company, he served as
Public Information Officer in the U.S. Army Air Force from 1950 to 1953
including attending Georgetown University Graduate School in 1952. Mr. Shorney
graduated from the University of Oklahoma with a B.A. degree in Journalism in
1950. From 1943 to 1945, he served in the U.S. Army Air Force as an air crew
member on a B-24 Bomber. Mr. Shorney is a member of the Oklahoma City
Association of Petroleum Landmen on which he has served as Director and
Secretary/Treasurer. He is an active member of the American Association of
Petroleum Landmen. In 1975, Mr. Shorney was first listed in the London Financial
Times' Who's Who in World Oil and Gas.
Robert D. Carl, III. Mr. Carl, age 42, was appointed a Director of the
General Partner on July 30, 1991 and is a member of the Audit Committee. He is
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Health Images,
Inc., a public company whose securities are traded on NYSE, which provides fixed
site magnetic resonance imaging ("MRI") services. From 1978 to 1981, Mr. Carl
also served as President of Carl Investment Associates, Inc. a registered
investment advisor. In 1981, Mr. Carl joined Cardio-Tech, Inc., as general
counsel and as an officer and Director. Upon the sale and reorganization of
Cardio-Tech, Inc. into Cardiopul Technologies in 1982, he served as its
Executive Vice President and as a Director. In March, 1985 he was elected
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Cardiopul Technologies which
spun off its non-imaging medical services business and changed its name to
Health Images, Inc. Mr. Carl received a B.A. in History from Franklin and
Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania in 1975 and a J.D. from Emory
University School of Law, Atlanta, Georgia in 1978. Mr. Carl is a trustee of
Franklin & Marshall College and is a member of the State Bar of Georgia.
On January 4, 1996, the SEC filed a complaint in the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia against Mr. Carl alleging that Mr. Carl
violated Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"),
and Rule 16a-2 and 16a-3 (and former Rule 16a-1) thereunder, by failing to
timely file reports concerning thirty-eight securities transactions in his
mother's brokerage accounts involving shares of Health Images, Inc. stock.
Although Mr. Carl's mother apparently did not
III-2
<PAGE>
live in his household, the SEC took the position that because Mr. Carl (1)
provided substantial financial support to his mother, (2) commingled his
mother's assets with his own, (3) provided a substantial portion of the funds
used to purchase the shares in question, and (4) received from his mother a
substantial portion of the sales proceeds, he, therefore, had a pecuniary
interest in, and was a beneficial owner of, the shares in question.
In response to the SEC's action, Mr. Carl disgorged to Health Images, Inc.
approximately $92,400 in short-swing profits from the trading in his mother's
account, plus interest thereon of approximately $52,600. The SEC further
requested the court to impose a $10,000 civil penalty against Mr. Carl pursuant
to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act. Without admitting or denying the
allegations in the complaint, Mr. Carl consented to the entry of a final
judgement imposing the $10,000 penalty. On January 12, 1996, a federal judge
entered the final judgement in this matter, and Mr. Carl has since filed amended
reports on Forms 4 and 5 reflecting these transactions in his mother's accounts.
In relation to the same matter, the SEC has issued an administrative Order
pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act against Mr. Carl, finding that he
violated Section 16(a) and the rules thereunder and requiring him to cease and
desist from committing or causing any violation or future violation of those
provisions. Without admitting or denying allegations in the SEC's Order, Mr.
Carl consented to the entry of the Order.
Robert E. Densford. Mr. Densford, age 38, was appointed a Director of the
General Partner on September 11, 1991. He joined the General Partner as
Controller on May 1, 1985 and became Vice President-Finance, Secretary and
Treasurer on March 1, 1989. From January 1983 to April 1985, he was Senior
Accountant for Deloitte Haskins & Sells in Houston, Texas, auditing both closely
held and publicly owned oil and gas companies. From September 1981 to December
1982, he was a staff accountant for Coopers & Lybrand in Houston. Mr. Densford
is a C.P.A. and holds a B.B.A. degree in Accounting and an M.S. degree in Oil
and Gas Accounting from Texas Tech University and is a member of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Texas Society of Certified
Public Accountants.
James A. Klein. Mr. Klein, age 32, joined the General Partner as Controller
in February 1991. In June 1993, he was appointed President and Principal of Enex
Securities Corporation. From June 1988 to February 1991, he was employed by
Positron Corporation in Houston. From July 1987 to May 1988, he was employed by
Transworld Oil Company in Houston and from September 1985 until July 1987, he
was an accountant with Deloitte Haskins & Sells in Houston, Texas, auditing oil
and gas and oil service companies. Mr. Klein is a Certified Public Accountant
and holds a B.A. in Accounting (1985) from the University of Iowa. He is a
member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Iowa
Society of Certified Public Accountants.
Item 10. Executive Compensation
The Company has no Directors or executive officers.
The Company does not pay a proportional or fixed share of the compensation
paid to the officers of the General Partner.
The Company reimburses the General Partner for direct costs and
administrative costs incurred on its behalf. Administrative costs allocated to
the Company are computed on a cost basis in accordance with standard industry
practices by allocating the time spent by the General Partner's personnel among
all projects and by allocating rent and other overhead on the basis of the
relative direct time charges.
III-3
<PAGE>
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
$500 Limited
Name of Partner Units Percent
Title of Class Beneficial Owner Owned Directly of Class
Limited Partner Enex Resources 2,064 23.2656%
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
See the Statements of Operations included in the Financial
Statements in Item 7 of this report for information concerning general and
administrative costs incurred by Enex and allocated to the Company, and Note 1
to such Financial Statements for information concerning payments to Enex
Securities Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Enex and to Enex for
certain offering and organization expenses incurred by the Company.
Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Sequential
Page No.
------------------
(a) Exhibits
(3) a. Amended Certificate and Agreement of Limited
Partnership. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit A to the Prospectus of Enex Oil & Gas
Income Program II dated May 1, 1985, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Rule 424(b) on or about May 8,
1985, except that the last sentence of Section
9.2 (m) thereof reads in full as follows:
If the General Partner or an
affiliate other than an affiliated
limited partnership acquires an
interest in any such property
acquisition, such appraisal will
be performed by independent
petroleum engineering consultants
and if the aggregate revenue
interest of the General Partner
and its affiliates in any
affiliated limited partnership in
such a property acquisition is
greater than their aggregate
revenue interest in the
Partnership, then with respect to
the property interests so acquired
the greater aggregate revenue
interest shall be reduced so as
not to exceed the lesser revenue
interest.
III-4
<PAGE>
(4) Not Applicable
(10) Not Applicable
(11) Not Applicable
(12) Not Applicable
(13) Not Applicable
(18) Not Applicable
(19) Not Applicable
(22) Not Applicable
(23) Not Applicable
(24) Not Applicable
(25) Not Applicable
(28) Not Applicable
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last
quarter of the period covered by this report.
III-5
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act,
the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
ENEX OIL AND GAS INCOME
PROGRAM - 7, L.P.
By: ENEX RESOURCES CORPORATION
the General Partner
March 18, 1996 By: /s/ G. B. Eckley
-------------------
G. B. Eckley, President
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been
signed below on March 18, 1996, by the following persons in the capacities
indicated.
ENEX RESOURCES CORPORATION General Partner
By: /s/ G. B. Eckley
------------------------
G. B. Eckley, President
/s/ G. B. Eckley
President, Chief Executive
------------------ Officer and Director
G. B. Eckley
/s/ R. E. Densford Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
-------------------
R. E. Densford
/s/ James A. Klein Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
-----------------
James A. Klein
S-1
<PAGE>
/s/ Robert D. Carl, III
--------------------------
Robert D. Carl, III Director
/s/ Martin J. Freedman
--------------------------
Martin J. Freedman Director
/s/ William C. Hooper, Jr.
--------------------------
William C. Hooper, Jr. Director
/s/ Tom Shorney
--------------------------
Tom Shorney Director
/s/ Stuart Strasner
--------------------------
Stuart Strasner Director
S-2
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
(Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000782335
<NAME> Enex Oil & Gas Income Program II - Series 7 L.P.
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START> jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END> dec-31-1995
<CASH> 12972
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 27318
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 48220
<PP&E> 2935887
<DEPRECIATION> 2117339
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 866768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 39631
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 791739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 866768
<SALES> 351842
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 351842
<CGS> 118655
<TOTAL-COSTS> 253339
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 34674
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> (112)
<INCOME-PRETAX> 0
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 0
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 63717
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
