AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 86-A LTD PARTNERSHIP
DEF 14A, 1996-09-19
REAL ESTATE
Previous: NEWMAN FINANCIAL CORP, 10-K405, 1996-09-19
Next: VWR SCIENTFIC PRODUCTS CORP, S-8, 1996-09-19





                    SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
                                
            PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
             OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                
                   (AMENDMENT NO.       )
                                
       Filed by the Registrant                    [X]
       Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

                   Check the appropriate box:

       [ ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement
       [ ]  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted
            by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
       [X]  Definitive Proxy Statement
       [ ]  Definitive Additional Materials
       [ ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to  240.14a-11(c) or 240.14a-12

            AEI Real Estate Fund 86-A Limited Partnership
        (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                          [Insert  Name]
   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[ ]  $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or
14a-6(i)(2) or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[ ]  $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3).
[ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)
and 0-11.

  (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:


  (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
   computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
   amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
   was determined):


  (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction :


  (5)  Total fee paid:


[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing.

  (1)  Amount Previously Paid:


  (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:


  (3)  Filing Party:


  (4)  Date Filed:






          AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 86-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                1300 Minnesota World Trade Center
                       30 East 7th Street
                   St. Paul, Minnesota  55101
                                
                        CONSENT STATEMENT
                                
         For Amendment to Limited Partnership Agreement
            to Permit Reinvestment of Sales Proceeds
                                
        THIS  CONSENT STATEMENT IS BEING MAILED TO INVESTORS ON  OR
ABOUT SEPTEMBER 15, 1996.  TO BE COUNTED, A PROPERLY SIGNED CONSENT
FORM  MUST  BE  RECEIVED BY THE MANAGING GENERAL  PARTNER  AT  1300
MINNESOTA  WORLD  TRADE  CENTER, 30  EAST  7TH  STREET,  ST.  PAUL,
MINNESOTA 55101, ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 31, 1996.

       AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc., the managing general partner
(the  "Managing  General Partner"), of AEI Real  Estate  Fund  86-A
Limited  Partnership (the "Partnership") is proposing an  amendment
(the   "Amendment")   to  the  Partnership's  Limited   Partnership
Agreement  (the "Partnership Agreement") to enable the  Partnership
to  reinvest  the  Net  Proceeds of Sale of Partnership  properties
until  the  final liquidation of the Partnership.  The  Partnership
Agreement was previously amended in December 1989 to provide for  a
60 month reinvestment period, which period has expired. Approval of
the Amendment will enable the Partnership to reinvest a portion  of
the  Net  Proceeds  of Sale resulting from sale  of  three  of  the
Partnership's properties, and any other sale that occurs  prior  to
the liquidation of this Partnership.

        The  proposed Amendment will affect your investment in  the
Partnership  in  a number of ways and involves a number  of  Risks,
including the following:

        If the Amendment is approved Investors will not receive the
  cash  generated from property sales that is reinvested, including
  an  additional  $269  of  cash from recent  sales  that  will  be
  distributed  absent  approval  of  the  Amendment,  until   final
  liquidation of the Partnership and will have only limited  rights
  to  present their units for repurchase before then.  There can be
  no   assurances  that  the  properties  in  which  proceeds   are
  reinvested  if  the Amendment is approved will generate  periodic
  distributions,  if  any,  in excess of  what  an  Investor  would
  receive from an alternative investment.

        The Amendment may render more difficult the disposition of
  properties  within the original intended life of the Partnership.
  The  General  Partners  intend to commence final  disposition  of
  properties  by  the year 2,000, although the disposition  of  any
  particular  property  may be delayed based on  market  and  other
  conditions.    The  Partnership  Agreement  provides   that   the
  Partnership   must   be   liquidiated  by,   and   the   ultimate
  distribution  of  its  assets could be delayed  until,  the  year
  2036.

      The General Partners have a conflict of interest in proposing
  the   Amendment   because  they  will  receive   more   aggregate
  reimbursements  from the Partnership if proceeds  are  reinvested
  than  they  will if proceeds were not reinvested.  Reimbursements
  to  the  General  Partners for expenses  incurred  have  averaged
  approximately  $125,000 per year during the past  two  years  and
  aggregated  $375,933 during the three years  ended  December  31,
  1995.   Such  reimbursements will decrease if cash is distributed
  and fewer properties are under management in the Partnership.

        Proceeds will be reinvested in additional triple net leased
  commercial properties that are subject to many of the same  risks
  of  nonperformance, (including risks related to  changing  market
  values,  tenant defaults, difficulty of resale, among others)  as
  the original properties.

       Investors will be taxed on the full amount of gain generated
  from  sale of properties but will receive distributions  designed
  to  cover potential tax effects assuming only a federal tax  rate
  of  35%.  If the Amendment is approved, Investors who have higher
  combined   federal   and  state  tax  rates   may   not   receive
  distributions  from  such  sales  adequate  to  cover  their  tax
  liabilities.

       Investors will not be able to review in advance the properties
  in which proceeds are reinvested.

       The Managing General Partner believes, as set forth in more
  detail below, that reinvestment will  allow the Partnership to
  generate additional rental income and potential gains on sale
  without incurring the expenses of capital raising.  For such
  reasons, the Managing General Partner recommends a vote "FOR" the
  proposed Amendment.



                             SUMMARY

    The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the more
detailed discussion of the proposed Amendment set forth herein and
in the text of the proposed Amendment.

       The Amendment.  The Managing General Partner is proposing an
Amendment to Section 5.4 of the Partnership Agreement that  would
eliminate the requirement that the Partnership distribute all Net
Proceeds of Sale of properties and allow reinvestment of some  or
all of such proceeds until final liquidation of the Partnership.

       Reasons for the Amendment.  The  Partnership holds a number
of   properties  which may  be sold prior to final liquidation of
the  Partnership due to favorable market conditions, exercise  of
lease  purchase  options, tenant restructuring or other  reasons.
Although  the Managing General Partner cannot guarantee  returns,
it  believes  it  can continue to generate favorable  returns  to
Investors   by  reinvestment  of  such  proceeds  in   additional
properties.  The Partnership sold its ownership in three  of  its
properties; an Applebee's restaurant in Ft. Myers, Florida, for a
net  cash  gain  of  $467,203, its ownership interest  of  a  20%
interest in a Cheddar's restaurant in Columbus, Ohio, for  a  net
cash  gain of $8,115, and an office building in Kearney, Nebraska
for  a net cash loss of $104,123.  The Partnership would like  to
reinvest the proceeds therefrom.

       Risks of the Amendment.  The Amendment will present several
risks, including the following:

   1.  Deferred Cash Distributions.  Rather than distributing all
net cash proceeds on sale of a property, the Amendment will allow
the  Partnership (if the Managing General Partner determines,  in
its  discretion,  that it is advantageous to the Partnership)  to
reinvest  such  proceeds  in  new  properties,  (subject   to   a
continuing   obligation  to  distribute   to   limited   partners
("Investors") as much cash proceeds as is necessary  to  pay  the
income tax liability (at a tax rate of 35%) generated by the sale
of  property).  Accordingly, distribution of cash on sale will be
delayed   until  the  Managing  General  Partner  determines   to
liquidate  the  Partnership and investors will  be  foregoing  an
immediate  distribution  of $269 per unit  if  the  Amendment  is
approved in return for the possibility of distributions  and  the
potential  for  appreciation in the  future.   There  can  be  no
assurance that properties in which proceeds will be reinvested in
the  Amendment  is approved will generate periodic  distributions
uin  excess  of  the  reeturn  that  could  be  obtained  on   an
alternative investment or that such properties will be eventually
be sold at a gain.

  2. Risk of Extension of Partnership Life.  The General Partners
intend to reinvest proceeds from sale of properties in properties
that will be sold again within the next few years.  The Amendment
may  render  more difficult the disposition of properties  within
the  original  intended  life of the  Partnership.   The  General
Partners  intend to commence final disposition of  properties  by
the  year  2,000,  although  the disposition  of  any  particular
property   may  be delayed based on market and other  conditions.
The  Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership must  be
liquidiated  by  the year 2036.  Accordingly, the  Amendment  may
have  the  effect  of extending the life of the  Partnership  for
several  years  and  delaying the ultimate  distribution  of  its
assets upon liquidation.

   3.   Real  Estate  Risks on Reinvestment.   Proceeds  will  be
reinvested  in additional triple net leased commercial properties
that   are   subject  to  the  same  risks  of   performance   or
nonperformance  as  the  properties originally  acquired  by  the
Partnership.  The value of real estate is subject to a number  of
factors beyond the control of the Partnership, including national
economic conditions, changes in interest rates, changes  in  real
estate  taxes, governmental rules and regulations and competition
from  other  forms  of financing.  If adverse  changes  in  these
general  conditions  negatively affect market  value,  the  final
disposition  of  the property, and the distribution  of  cash  to
investors,  may  be delayed or the disposition may  result  in  a
loss,  or  both.  The value of properties in which the fund  will
invest will be effected by the financial condition of the tenant.
If  a  tenant  is  unable to perform its lease  obligations,  the
Partnership  may  not  be able to sell the property  and  may  be
forced to sell the property at a loss.  Further, in the event  of
a  bankruptcy of a tenant, the Partnership might not be  able  to
obtain  possession of the property for a considerable  period  of
time.

   4.   Undesignated Properties.  Investors will not be  able  to
review   in   advance  the  properties  in  which  proceeds   are
reinvested.

  5.  General Partner Conflicts of Interest. The General Partners
have  a  conflict of interest in proposing the Amendment  because
they   will  receive  more  aggregate  reimbursements  from   the
Partnership if proceeds are reinvested than they will if proceeds
were not reinvested.  The General Partner will be reimbursed  for
the  costs  it  incurs,  including costs  of  its  personnel,  in
reinvesting the proceeds and managing the properties in which the
proceeds  are reinvested.  Such reimbursements will  include  the
salaries of personnel of the General Partner during the time they
spend  on such activities, plus  a small portion (based on  hours
of  employees spent on partnership activies and the assets of the
partnership as compared to all partnerships the General  Partners
manage) of other overhead, such as rental expense, of the General
Partners.   Reimbursements to the General Partners  for  expenses
incurred have averaged approximately $125,000 per year during the
past  two years and aggregated approximately over $375,933 during
the  three  years  ended December 31, 1995.  Such  reimbursements
will  decrease  if cash is distributed and fewer  properties  are
under management in the Partnership.



            REASONS FOR AND EFFECTS OF THE AMENDMENT

General

        If  Investors  approve the Amendment of  the  Partnership
Agreement, the Partnership would have the opportunity,  upon  the
sale  or other disposition of properties which it currently  owns
or which may be acquired, to reinvest the Net Proceeds of Sale in
additional  triple  net leased properties.   Under  the  original
terms  of  the  Partnership Agreement, reinvestment  of  the  Net
Proceeds  of  Sale from the sale of properties was limited  to  a
period  of  24  months, which expired July 9, 1988.   In  October
1989,  the Partnership Agreement was amended to allow  for  a  60
month  period  for  reinvestment of Net Proceeds of  Sale,  which
expired  July  9,  1991.  By consenting to the Amendment  of  the
Partnership Agreement, Investors would permit the Partnership  to
acquire  new  properties with the Net Proceeds of Sale  from  the
sale  of the Applebee's, Cheddar's and office building properties
(net  of  any  distributions to Investors) or any other  sale  of
Partnership  property that occurs prior to the final  liquidation
of the Partnership.

        The  Amendment is not intended to extend the life of  the
Partnership.   The  Prospectus pursuant to  which  the  units  of
limited partnership interest were sold indicated that the General
Partners  expected that most of the properties would be  sold  or
refinanced   eight   to  twelve  years  after  acquisition.   The
Applebee's property described below was acquired in 1988  and  it
remains  the  intention  to  sell the properties  in  which  sale
proceeds  are  reinvested, depending market  conditions  and  the
benefits of continued ownership, by the year 2000.

       The Managing General Partner believes that it can generate
favorable  returns  through the investment of  sale  proceeds  in
newly  constructed properties that it purchases  at  construction
cost  and  resells  within  a few years.   The  Managing  General
Partner  believes  that,  in most cases,  because  the  owner  is
compensated  for the risk of development and contruction  through
increase  in  market value, the market value of  properties  will
exceed  the cost of development.  Because no commissions will  be
paid  in  connection  with reinvestment,  the  entire  amount  of
reinvested  proceeds  can be applied to the  purchase  price  and
expenses   associated   with  acquisition   of   newly   acquired
properties.  Further, the Managing General Partner believes that,
if  allowed  to  reinvest  the Net  Proceeds  of  Sale  (after  a
distribution  to  Investors to cover income taxes  in  accordance
with  the Partnership Agreement), it can acquire properties  that
will  generate  attractive net rental income for the  Partnership
during  the  period  they are held.  Recent acquisitions  by  the
General Partners for other real estate limited partnerships  that
have   investment  objectives  substantially  identical  to   the
Partnership  have produced what the General Partners believe  are
favorable  rental  rates.  No assurances can be  given,  however,
that  a property acquired by the Partnership will produce similar
rentals,  that  such  rentals will not be interrupted  by  events
outside  the  Managing  General Partners' control,  or  that  the
market  value of any properties acquired will exceed  their  cost
immediately  after  acquisition or within the several  years  the
Partnership proposes to hold the properties.

       The Managing General Partner of the Partnership is currently
evaluating a number of properties for acquisition.  Affilates  of
the  Managing  General Partners manage eleven public  and  eleven
private real estate partnerships and have developed relationships
with   the  companies  that  lease  properties  from  such  other
partnerships  that  cause  them to  send  proposals  for  similar
properties to the General Partners.  The Managing General Partner
will  not be obligated to obtain the consent of Investors  as  to
the  type  of  property acquired if this Amendment  is  approved.
Nevertheless,  any  property  acquired  will  comply   with   the
investment  objectives and policies set forth in  the  Prospectus
pursuant to which the Units were initially offered.  Any property
acquired  will be an existing commercial property  that  will  be
acquired  on  a debt-free basis and will likely be  leased  to  a
single  tenant  pursuant to a triple-net lease in  the  franchise
restaurant  industry.   No property will  be  acquired  from  the
General Partners or their Affiliates.  There can, however, be  no
assurance that favorable returns will be achieved.

Sale of Properties

       The Amendment is being proposed at this time to facilitate
reinvestment of Net Proceeds of Sale of an Applebee's  restaurant
in  Ft. Myers, Florida, a Cheddar's restaurant in Columbus,  Ohio
and  an  office  building in Kearney, Nebraska.  The  Partnership
purchased the Applebee's restaurant property on February 1, 1988.
The property was leased to Apple South, Inc. under a 20-year, non-
cancelable  triple-net lease agreement.  The total  cost  of  the
property  to the Partnership was $1,179,405.  The lease agreement
provided  Apple  South,  Inc. with  an  option  to  purchase  the
property  after the seventh lease year.  The purchase  price  was
the  greater of a) $1,170,000 increased by 5% per annum per lease
year,  or  b)  the  average rent paid  by  the  lessee  over  the
immediately preceding two year period divided by eleven  percent,
or  c) the fair market value of the property thirty days prior to
the time of closing.

        Apple South, Inc. exercised that option by notifying  the
Partnership and the sale of the property closed on July 28, 1995.
The Partnership received Net Proceeds of Sale of $1,646,608 which
resulted   in  a  net  cash  gain  on  sale  of  $467,203.    The
Partnership's adjusted basis in the property, after depreciation,
was $978,299.  Accordingly, the sale of the property generated  a
taxable  gain  of  $668,309, or $90.98  per  outstanding  limited
partnership unit.

        The Partnership purchased a 20% interest in the Cheddar's
restaurant  property on June 7, 1990.  The remaining interest  in
the  property was purchased by AEI Real Estate Fund XVIII Limited
Partnership,  an affiliate of the Partnership.  The property  was
leased to Heartland Restaurant Corporation under a 20-year,  non-
cancelable  triple-net lease agreement.  The total  cost  of  the
property  to the Partnership was $306,711.  On July 6, 1995,  the
property  was  sold  to  Heartland  Restaurant  Corporation.  The
Partnership  received  Net Proceeds of  Sale  of  $314,826  which
resulted in a net cash gain on sale of $8,115.  The Partnership's
adjusted basis in the property, after depreciation, was $269,419.
Accordingly, the sale of the property generated a taxable gain of
$45,407, or $6.24 per outstanding limited partnership unit.

        The Partnership purchased the office building on December
13,  1986.  The total cost was $434,623.  The property was leased
to   Myron   Andersen   Construction,  Inc.   under   a   10-year
noncancellable  triple-net Lease Agreement.  In  July,  1992,  it
became apparent that Myron Andersen Construction, Inc. would  not
be  able to comply with the terms of the Lease Agreement and  the
Partnership replaced them with another lessee who, in 1993, filed
for  reorganization.   Since 1993, the Partnership  has  had  the
property for sale or lease.

        On  April 20, 1996, the property was sold to Sports West,
L.L.C.    The  Partnership  received  net  proceeds  of  sale  of
approximately  $330,500 which resulted in  a  net  cash  loss  of
approximately $104,123.  The Partnership's adjusted basis in  the
property, after depreciation was $311,500.  Accordingly, the sale
of  the  property  generated  a  taxable  gain  of  approximately
$19,000, or $2.63 per outstanding limited partnership unit.

       The Partnership has distributed approximately $263,000, or
approximately  $36 per outstanding Limited Partnership  Unit,  of
the  Net  Proceeds  of  Sale  to  cover  income  tax  liabilities
generated by the sales.  The distribution of the Net Proceeds  of
Sale  were made in the third and fourth quarter of 1995  and  the
first   quarter  of  1996  as  part  of  the  regular   quarterly
distribution,  with  the  entire third  quarter  distribution  of
approximately  $142,000  representing  a  distribution   of   Net
Proceeds  of  Sale.  The distribution of  Net  Proceeds  on  Sale
reduced  the Adjusted Capital Contributions of Investors  by  $36
per  outstanding limited partnership unit.  The remainder of  the
proceeds  would be reinvested in new properties, if the Investors
approve the Amendment.

        In  the  event  Investors do not approve  the  Amendment,
Investors  will  receive  a total distribution  of  approximately
$2,200,000,   or  approximately  $305  per  outstanding   limited
partnership  unit,  from  sale of the Applebee's,  Cheddar's  and
office building properties.  Of such amount, $263,000 has already
been  distributed  to  cover income tax  liabilities  of  limited
partners ($142,000 in the third quarter of 1995, $82,000  of  the
fourth quarter of 1995 and $39,000 of the first quarter of 1996).
The  balance of the Net Proceeds of Sale ($1,937,000 or $269  per
unit)  would to be distributed in the fourth quarter of  1996  if
the  amendment  is not approved.  The Net Proceeds  of  Sale  not
distributed  will  be  retained by  the  Partnership  as  working
capital reserves.  The distribution of Net Proceeds on Sale would
reduce  the Adjusted Capital Contributions of Investors  by  $305
per outstanding limited partnership unit.

        The  Applebee's, Cheddar's and office building  generated
rental  revenues of $197,010 during the year ended  December  31,
1994.  If the proceeds from its sale are distributed, rather than
reinvested,  future  Partnership  revenues,  and  therefore  cash
distributions  to investors, will be reduced by  a  corresponding
amount.

Risks of Reinvestment

        The  reinvestment  of proceeds from  the  sale  of  these
properties,  like  the original investment in properties  by  the
Partnership,  is  subject  to a number of  risks,  including  the
following:

           Investors  will not be able to review in  advance  the
     properties in which proceeds are reinvested;

           Investors  will  not receive the cash  generated  from
     property  sales  until final liquidation of the  Partnership
     and will have only limited rights to present their units for
     repurchase before then;

           Investors  will be taxed on the full  amount  of  gain
     generated   from  sale  of  properties  but   will   receive
     distributions designed to cover potential tax effects  at  a
     tax rate of 35% that may not match their tax obligations;

           Proceeds will be reinvested in additional  triple  net
     leased  commercial properties that are subject to  the  same
     risks   of  nonperformance,  (including  risks  related   to
     changing  market  values,  tenant  defaults,  difficulty  of
     resale, among others) as the original properties;

           The  General Partners have a conflict of  interest  in
     proposing  the  Amendment because  they  will  receive  more
     aggregate  reimbursements from the Partnership  if  proceeds
     are   reinvested  than  they  would  if  proceeds  were  not
     reinvested.

        Although the General Partners intend to reinvest any  Net
Proceeds  of Sale in properties that will further the  objectives
of  preserving capital, creating a favorable return through  cash
distributions from rentals, and appreciation realized on  resale,
there  can be no assurances that such objectives will be achieved
or that the ultimate distribution of Net Proceeds of Sale will be
larger when the new properties are eventually sold.


                 INTEREST OF THE GENERAL PARTNER
                                
        The  General Partners will be reimbursed for  any  costs,
including a proportionate amount of employee salary, benefit  and
overhead expense, they incur in completing any acquisition and in
connection  with  management of the property in accordance  with,
and  subject  to  the  limitations in the Partnership  Agreement.
Generally,  costs are allocated to the Partnership based  on  the
daily timesheets of employees.  The General Partners establish an
hourly  charge for each employee based on their salaries, benefit
expense and overhead expense (the portion of rental, depreciation
and  other office charges necessary to maintain the employee) and
the  Partnership is charged for the amount of time speant by  the
employee on partnership activities multiplied by the time charge.
To  the extent that the Amendment to the Partnership Agreement is
not  approved,  and the proceeds from the sale of the  properties
are not reinvested, the amount of capital under management by the
General  Partners through the Partnership, and the scope  of  the
Partnership's  operations,  will  be  reduced  and  the   General
Partners  would have to deploy its employees in other activities.
Such  reduced operations can be expected to reduce the  aggregate
amount  of reimbursements that the General Partners receive  from
the  Partnership.    Reimbursements to the General  Partners  for
expenses  incurred have averaged approximately $125,000 per  year
during  the  past  two years and aggregated $375,933  during  the
three  years  ended December 31, 1995.  Such reimbursements  will
decrease  if cash is distributed and fewer properties  are  under
management in the Partnership.

        The  Managing General Partner holds 23 Units as a limited
partner  in  the  Partnership.   No  other  General  Partner   or
Affiliate of the General Partners holds any interest as a limited
partner in the Partnership.

                          VOTING UNITS
                                
        Voting  by  Investors on an Amendment of the  Partnership
Agreement  is based upon Partnership units ("Voting Units").   As
of July 1, 1996, there were 7,221.31667 Voting Units outstanding.
Each  Voting Unit is entitled to one vote.  Fractions  of  Voting
Units will be included in the total.

        To  the best of the Managing General Partner's knowledge,
there is no beneficial owner holding five percent or more of  the
Voting Units including the General Partners.

        In  order  for  the proposed Amendment to be  adopted,  a
majority  of  the  Voting Units must be voted  in  favor  of  the
Amendment.  Because an abstention will not be counted as  a  vote
for the Amendment, it would have the effect of a vote against the
Amendment.

                      PROCEDURES FOR VOTING
                                
        Accompanying this Consent Statement is a Consent Form for
each  Investor  with  respect to his/her unit  ownership  in  the
Partnership.  By checking the appropriate box, each Investor  can
indicate  whether he/she votes FOR or AGAINST or abstains  as  to
the  proposed Amendment.  If any Investor returns a Consent  Form
duly  signed without checking any box, he/she will be  deemed  to
have voted FOR the Amendment.

        An Investor who votes against, or abstains, does not have
appraisal or similar rights under Minnesota law.

       The Managing General Partner has fixed the close of business
on  July 1, 1996 as the record date for the determination of  the
Investors  entitled to vote on the proposed Amendment; the  close
of  business  on  October 31, 1996 as the date by  which  Consent
Forms  must be received by the Managing General Partner in  order
to  be  counted; and November 1, 1996 as the date  on  which  the
consents  are to be counted.  An Investor may revoke  his/her/its
consent  at any time prior to October 31, 1996, provided  written
revocation is received by the Managing General Partner  prior  to
that date.

       The cost of solicitation of consents of the Investors will
be  borne by the Partnership.  The solicitations will be made  by
the  mails.  This Consent Statement was first mailed to Investors
on  July 31, 1996.  Staff of the Managing General Partner will be
available  by  telephone to answer any questions concerning  this
Consent.

                   INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
                                
        The  information  included under the captions  "Financial
Statements   and   Notes  to  Financial  Statements,"   "Selected
Financial  Data"  and  Management's Discussion  and  Analysis  of
Financial   Condition   and  Results  of   Operations"   of   the
Partnership's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for  the  year  ended
December  31,  1995, as  amended  on  August  30, 1996,  Quarterly
Report on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended March 31, 1996, 
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended  June 30,
1996 and  Current  Report on  Form  8-K dated April 24,  1996  is
hereby  incorporated by  reference.  Copies of  such sections are
being delivered to you with  this  consent statement.


                            BY  ORDER OF  THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                            OF AEI FUND MANAGEMENT 86-A, INC.



                            Robert P. Johnson, President




       Exhibit A


                      PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF
                LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF
                    AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 86-A
                                
                                
         Changes  in  the  existing  provisions  of  the  Limited
Partnership  Agreement  that  would  be  made  by  the   proposed
Amendment  are shown below.  Existing provisions proposed  to  be
omitted are enclosed in brackets.  New matter is printed in bold.

        SECTION 5.4 DISTRIBUTION OF NET PROCEEDS OF SALE
                                
       5.4   Distribution of Net Proceeds of Sale.  Upon financing,
refinancing, sale or other disposition of any of the  Properties,
Net  Proceeds of Sale may be reinvested in additional  properties
until  [a  date 60 months after the date on which the  offer  and
sale  of  units  pursuant to the Prospectus is  terminated],  the
General  Partner determines that it is in the best  interests  of
the   Partnership  to  begin  liquidation  of  the   Partnership;
provided,  however,  that sufficient cash is distributed  to  the
Limited  Partners to pay state and federal income taxes (assuming
Limited  Partners are taxable at the lesser of (i) a 40% rate  on
ordinary income and a 16% rate on capital gain income or (ii) the
maximum marginal tax rates then in effect) created as a result of
such transaction.


    IMPORTANT                                     IMPORTANT
                                
          AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 86-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                
                   CONSENT OF LIMITED PARTNERS
             This consent is solicited by the Board
         of Directors of AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.,
                  The Managing General Partner
                                
       The undersigned, a Limited Partner of AEI Real Estate Fund
86-A  Limited  Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby  consents
(unless  otherwise  directed below) to  the  proposal  identified
below  to  adopt  an  Amendment to Section  5.4  of  the  Limited
Partnership   Agreement  of  the  Partnership  (the  "Partnership
Agreement"),  as  more fully described in the  Consent  Statement
(the  "Proposal").  By voting for the Proposal,  the  undersigned
hereby appoints AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc. as its attorney-in-
fact  with  power  to  sign and acknowledge  on  its  behalf  any
instrument that may be necessary to evidence the Amendment to the
Partnership  Agreement  and any corresponding  Amendment  to  the
Certificate of Limited Partnership.

       Please date and sign this Consent below and return it in the
enclosed,  postage  paid envelope.  To be counted,  this  Consent
must  be received not later than the close of business on October
31, 1996.

Adoption of Amendment to Section 5.4 of the Partnership Agreement
                                
    [ ]   FOR            [ ]   AGAINST             [ ]   ABSTAIN


        The Partnership Units held by the signing Limited Partner
will be voted as directed.  They will be voted "FOR" the Proposal
if no box is checked.

        Please  sign  exactly as your name appears  below.   When
Partnership  units are held by joint tenants, both owners  should
sign.  When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee
or  guardian,  please give full title as such.  If a corporation,
please  sign  in  full  corporate  name  by  President  or  other
authorized officer.  If a partnership, please sign in partnership
name by authorized person.


PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THIS CONSENT.

Dated:          , 1996


______________________________________     ________________________________
Signature                                  (if held jointly)




September 23, 1996



Dear AEI Fund 86-A Investor:

     The enclosed Consent Statement proposes an amendment to the
Partnership Agreement that will, if approved by a majority of the
Partners, allow this Fund to reinvest a portion of the proceeds
from property sales into replacement net leased properties.  When
a Fund such as this is originally organized, it is intended that
the properties acquired will be held for an extended period of
time_usually 10 to 12 years.  That provides time for the
distribution of income from rents and time for the property to
potentially appreciate in value.  From time to time, however, it
is advantageous for the Fund to sell a property earlier than
anticipated if a gain can be realized.

     Your Fund's Partnership Agreement requires the distribution
of ALL of the proceeds from any sale of properties.  For the
reasons outlined in the enclosed Consent Statement, we believe
that it would be advantageous for your Fund to be able to sell
certain of its properties, distribute a portion of any profits
realized to cover income tax liabilities (at a rate of 35% of the
gain realized), and reinvest the balance of such proceeds into
replacement properties, until the final liquidation of the Fund
occurs.  To facilitate this, we are proposing an amendment to the
Partnership Agreement.  Although we believe reinvestment will
allow us to maximize the Partnership's profit potential and avoid
an erosion of its asset base, reinvestment of sales proceeds will
affect you in a number of ways and involve a number of risks
including the following:

    If the Amendment is approved Investors will not receive the
  cash generated from property sales that is reinvested,
  including an additional $269 of cash from recent sales that
  will be distributed absent approval of the Amendment, until
  final liquidation of the Partnership and will have only
  limited rights to present their units for repurchase before
  then.  There can be no assurances that the properties in which
  proceeds are reinvested if the Amendment is approved will
  generate periodic distributions, if any, in excess of what an
  Investor would receive from an alternative investment.

    The Amendment may render more difficult the disposition of
  properties within the original intended life of the
  Partnership.  The General Partners intend to commence final
  disposition of properties by the year 2,000, although the
  disposition of any particular property may be delayed based on
  market and other conditions.  The Partnership Agreement
  provides that the Partnership must be liquidated by, and the
  ultimate distribution of its assets could be delayed until,
  the year 2036.

    The General Partners have a conflict of interest in
  proposing the Amendment because they will receive more
  aggregate reimbursements from the Partnership if proceeds are
  reinvested than they will if proceeds were not reinvested.
  Reimbursements to the General Partners have averaged
  approximately $125,000 per year during the past two years and
  aggregated $375,933 during the three years ended December 31,
  1995.  Such reimbursements will decrease if cash is
  distributed and fewer properties are under management in the
  Partnership.

    Proceeds will be reinvested in additional triple net leased
  commercial properties that are subject to many of the same
  risks of nonperformance, (including risks related to changing
  market values, tenant defaults, difficulty of resale, among
  others) as the original properties.

    Investors will be taxed on the full amount of gain generated
  from sale of properties but will receive distributions
  designed to cover potential tax effects assuming only a
  federal tax rate of 35%.  If the Amendment is approved,
  Investors who have higher combined federal and state tax rates
  may not receive distributions from such sales adequate to
  cover their tax liabilities.

          Investors will not be able to review in advance the
     properties in which proceeds are reinvested.

     Your General Partner recommends you vote "FOR" this proposed
Amendment.  Please vote "FOR" on the Consent Statement vote form
and return it in the prepaid envelope today.  If you have any
questions regarding your Fund, or this Consent Statement, please
call AEI Investment Services at 1-800-328-3519.

     Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission