PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC
U-57, 2000-12-29
ELECTRIC & OTHER SERVICES COMBINED
Previous: OPPENHEIMER LIMITED TERM GOVERNMENT FUND, 24F-2NT, 2000-12-29
Next: MCLAREN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC, 10KSB40, 2000-12-29





                                                              File No. _________



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


                                Washington, D.C.


                                    FORM U-57

                 NOTIFICATION OF FOREIGN UTILITY COMPANY STATUS

                        Filed under Section 33 (a) of the

             Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended


            EMPRESA DISTRIBUIDORA DE ELECTRICIDAD DE ENTRE RIOS S.A.
                      (Name of the foreign utility company)


                  PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

                 (Name of filing company, if filed on behalf of
                           a foreign utility company)


ITEM 1
------

NOTIFICATION
------------
     Public Service  Enterprise Group Incorporated  ("PSEG"),  a holding company
exempt from the Public  Utility  Holding  Company Act of 1935,  as amended  (the
"Holding  Company Act")  pursuant to Section  3(a)(1)  thereof and the corporate
parent of Public Service Electric and Gas Company  ("PSE&G"),  a "public-utility
company" as that term is defined in the Holding  Company Act,  hereby files with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), pursuant to Section 33 of
the Holding  Company Act, this Form U-57 on behalf of Empresa  Distribuidora  De
Electricidad De Entre Rios S.A. ("EDEERSA"),  an Argentine corporation,  for the
purpose of notifying  the  Commission  that EDEERSA is, and hereby claims status
as, a "foreign utility company" ("FUCO") within the meaning of Section 33 of the
Holding  Company Act.

<PAGE>

     EDEERSA is the principal  distributor  and transmitter of electric power to
the province of Entre Rios, Argentina.  EDEERSA distributes electrical energy to
more than 230,000  customers in a province  that has a population  of nearly 1.1
million. In 1999, EDEERSA sold approximately 1,472 GWh of electric power.

     Neither  EDEERSA nor any of its  subsidiary  companies  owns or derives any
part of its income, directly or indirectly,  from the generation,  transmission,
or distribution  of electric  energy for sale or the  distribution of natural or
manufactured  gas for heat,  light or power within the United States of America,
and neither  EDEERSA nor any of its  subsidiary  companies  is a  public-utility
company operating in the United States of America,  as such terms are defined in
the Holding Company Act.

     In 1996,  Inversora  en  Distribucion  de Entre  Rios  S.A.,  an  Argentine
company, ("Inverder"), acquired ninety percent (90%) of the voting securities of
EDEERSA with the  remaining  ten percent  (10%) of the voting  securities  being
acquired by EDEERSA's  employees  pursuant to a privatization  by the provincial
government  of Entre  Rios.  Inverder  was an  investment  company  formed  by a
consortium  for  the  purpose  of the  EDEERSA  investment.  At the  time of the
acquisition by Inverder of EDEERSA,  Consumers Power was the only public-utility
affiliate  of Inverder.  On April 25,  1996,  CMS  Enterprises  Company  filed a
Notification of Foreign  Utility Company Status,  Form U-57 with the Commission,
on behalf of EDEERSA (1).

     Pursuant to a Stock  Purchase  Agreement  dated  December  13,  2000,  PSEG
Americas Ltd., a Bermuda  limited  company ("PSEG  Americas"),  will acquire one
hundred  percent  (100%) of the voting  securities of Inverder.  PSEG  Americas'
acquisition of Inverder's voting securities will take place in two stages. On or
about  December 29, 2000,  PSEG Americas will acquire  approximately  forty nine
percent (2)(49%) of the voting  securities of Inverder ("Phase I Closing").  The
remaining fifty one percent (3) (51%) of the voting  securities of Inverder will
be acquired by PSEG Americas or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries on or about
May 16, 2001 ("Phase II Closing").

ITEM I
------

Name and business address of the entity claiming FUCO status:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Empresa Distribuidora De Electricidad De Entre Rios S.A.
Buenos Aires 87
(3100) Parana
Provincia de Entre Rios
Argentina

Description of the facilities:
------------------------------
     EDEERSA will derive its income from the distribution, transmission and sale
of electric energy to the Province of Entre Rios,  Argentina.  EDEERSA's  assets
include transmission lines of 132 Kv and 33Kv; distribution lines of 13.2 Kv and
380/220 volts and transmission  and  subtransmission  transformer  stations (the
"Facilities").  EDEERSA  currently  purchases the bulk of its electricity on the
wholesale  electricity  market.  The  Facilities  are located in the Province of
Entre Rios, Argentina.

<PAGE>

Ownership of Voting Securities:
-------------------------------
     The voting securities of EDEERSA are owned ninety percent (90%) by Inverder
and ten percent  (10%) by the  employees of EDEERSA.  Upon  consummation  of the
Phase II  Closing  under the Stock  Purchase  Agreement  referenced  above,  one
hundred  percent  (100%) of the voting  securities  of Inverder will be owned by
PSEG Americas Ltd. or its wholly owned subsidiaries.

     During the  interim  period  between  the Phase I Closing  and the Phase II
Closing,  the  companies  who will own five  percent  (5%) or more of the voting
securities of Inverder are as follows:

PSEG Americas Ltd.                                                     19.1%
Compania De Inversiones En Energia Electrica S.A. ("CIEESA")           53.5%
Astra Compania Argentina de Petroleo S.A.                              10.7%
Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires S.A.                                    6.1%
Latin America Energy and Electricity Fund I, L.P.                       7.5%

     PSEG Americas  Ltd. is a wholly owned  indirect  subsidiary  of PSEG.  Upon
consummation of the Phase I Closing, CIEESA (4) will be owned forty nine percent
(49%) by PSEG  Americas  Ltd.  and fifty one  percent  (51%)  indirectly  by CMS
Enterprises  Company,  which in turn is a wholly owned  subsidiary of CMS Energy
Corporation. Upon consummation of the Phase II Closing, CIEESA will be owned one
hundred percent (100%) by PSEG Americas Ltd.

ITEM 2
------

Domestic Associate Public-Utility Companies
-------------------------------------------
     Upon completion of the Phase II Closing, PSE&G, a wholly owed subsidiary of
PSEG, will be the only domestic associate public-utility affiliate of Applicant,
as such terms are defined in Section 2 of the Holding  Company  Act.  PSE&G is a
wholly owned direct subsidiary of PSEG, a publicly-held holding company,  exempt
by rule under  Section  3(a)(1) of the Holding  Company  Act.  PSE&G will pay no
portion of the purchase price for its  affiliate's  interest in, and will itself
have no interest in, EDEERSA.

     During  the  interim  period  between  the  Phase I and  Phase II  Closings
referenced  above,  Applicant  will have two domestic  associate  public-utility
company affiliates as such terms are defined in Section 2 of the Holding Company
Act - PSE&G and Consumers Power.

     Consumers Power is a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Energy Corporation. CMS
Enterprises  Company is also a wholly owned  indirect  subsidiary  of CMS Energy
Corporation.  Consumers  Power  paid no portion  of the  purchase  price for its
affiliate's interest in, and itself has no interest in, EDEERSA.

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT A
----------

State Commission Certification - New Jersey
-------------------------------------------
     Exhibit A has been  omitted  for the State of New  Jersey for  reasons  set
forth below, since the state certification  requirement with regard to the State
of New  Jersey  is deemed  satisfied  by  Orders  issued  in 1986,  prior to the
enactment  of Section 33 (a) (2) of the  Holding  Company  Act,  by the Board of
Public  Utilities of the State of New Jersey ("BPU"),  the only state commission
having  jurisdiction  over the retail  gas and  electricity  rates of PSE&G.  In
support of such claimed exemption from state certification, PSEG incorporates by
reference  the BPU  Order of  January  17,  1986,  entitled  "Order  Authorizing
Transfer of Capital  Stock and  Approval  of Merger",  as amended by the BPU and
Order dated November 13, 1986,  entitled "Order Authorizing  Transfer of Capital
Stock and Approval of Merger" also  incorporated  by reference (5). PSEG asserts
that such BPU Orders satisfy the requirements of Section 33 (a)(2).

     Section 33 (a)(2) requires that every state commission having  jurisdiction
over the retail  electric or gas rates of a  public-utility  company  that is an
associate  company or an  affiliate  of an otherwise  exempted  foreign  utility
company must certify to the Securities and Exchange  Commission that it has "the
authority and resources to protect  ratepayers  subject to its  jurisdiction and
that it intends to exercise its authority."

     Section 33 (a) (2) also  provides  that this  requirement  "shall be deemed
satisfied"  if, prior to the enactment of Section 33 (a) (2), the relevant state
commission   had,   "on  the  basis  of   prescribed   conditions   of   general
applicability," determined that the ratepayers of the public utility company are
"adequately   insulated   from   the   effects   of   diversification   and  the
diversification would not impair the ability of the state commission to regulate
effectively the operations of such company."

     PSE&G,  an  associate  company  or  affiliate  company  of  EDEERSA,  is  a
public-utility company that, among other things, distributes electric energy and
natural gas at retail in the United States. As indicated above, the retail rates
of PSE&G are  regulated by the New Jersey BPU. The BPU Orders  referenced  above
authorize the transfer of PSE&G's issued and outstanding  shares of common stock
to a new holding company to be formed - PSEG.  This Order, as amended,  commonly
referred to as the Holding Company Order, was and is generally applicable to all
of PSEG's  non-utility  activities.  The BPU (at pp. 3-6 of the January 17, 1986
Order) imposed seventeen (17) conditions generally applicable to the new holding
company and its subsidiaries.

     The  BPU  additionally  noted  (at  p.  9)  that  it  can  monitor  PSE&G's
inter-corporate transactions with affiliates; assure that utility assets are not
transferred  to  unregulated  affiliates  and that  the  utility  is  adequately
compensated for the transfer of such assets; and assure adequate  capitalization
by reducing the earnings of PSE&G until the holding company makes proper capital
commitments. Such Order stated (at p.8) the BPU's conclusion that:

     "This Board has ample statutory authority to regulate all utility activites
(sic) and, if required by existing facts or  circumstances,  to take  reasonable
and appropriate  action in order to resolve  regulatory  problems and to protect
the public."

<PAGE>

The BPU further stated that:

     "The Board's traditional regulatory powers will provide all the enforcement
that the Board  will need to  assure  that  PSE&G's  utility  operation  and its
customers  receive  first  priority,  and that  diversification  by the  Holding
Company  does not affect the utility or its  customers.  The Board's  regulatory
tools will be at least as  effective  when applied to PSE&G as part of a holding
company  structure  as they would be if PSE&G were to embark on  diversification
through wholly-owned subsidiaries."

The BPU concluded by finding inter alia (at p. 10) that:

     (2)The  proposed  conditions  set out in the joint  Position and  Agreement
entered into by the Petitioner and Staff are reasonable and appropriate, and, in
conjunction with existing statutes, provide this Board with sufficient means and
authority by which to properly regulate utility operations;

     (3) The proposed  restructuring  will have no adverse impact upon the rates
charged to Petitioner's ratepayers, the employees of the utility or upon PSE&G's
ability to render safe, adequate and proper service;

     Accordingly,  the BPU, the sole state commission with jurisdiction over the
retail rates of PSE&G  determined,  as set forth in the BPU Orders, on the basis
of prescribed conditions of general applicability,  that the ratepayers of PSE&G
are  adequately   insulated  from  the  effects  of  diversification   and  that
diversification  would not impair the ability of the BPU to effectively regulate
the utility operations of PSE&G.

State Commission Certification - Michigan
-----------------------------------------
     CMS Enterprises  Company received the certification  required under section
33(a)(2) of the Act from the Michigan  Public  Service  Commission  and attached
such  certification to the Notification of Foreign Utility Company Status,  Form
U-57 filed with the Commission on April 25, 1996.

<PAGE>

Conclusion
----------
     Accordingly,  EDEERSA  satisfies the criteria set forth in section 33(a) of
the Holding Company Act for qualification as a foreign utility company.

     The undersigned  company has duly caused this statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                          PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP
                                          INCORPORATED


                                          By: R. EDWIN SELOVER
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              R. E. Selover
                                              Vice President and General Counsel

Date:  December 29, 2000


-------------------------------------------
     1 The U-57 filing was submitted in the name "Empresa Distribuidora de Entre
Rios  S.A." and  included a copy of the  certification  required  under  section
33(a)(2) of the Act from the Michigan Public Service Commission.
     2 The Phase I Closing results in the direct purchase of 19.1% of Inverder's
voting securities and the purchase of 49% of the voting securities of CIEESA a
company holding 53.5% of the voting securities of Inverder.
     3 The Phase II Closing results in the direct purchase by CIEESA of 27.4% of
Inverder's  voting  securities  and the purchase by PSEG  Americas of 51% of the
voting  securities of CIEESA a company holding 53.5% of the voting securities of
Inverder.
     4 Norberto Pablo Larrosa Zavalia owns one (1) CIESSA Class A share.
     5 PSEG has previously  relied on and filed paper copies with the Commission
of such BPU Orders as satisfaction of the state certification  requirement.  See
U-57  filings of Public  Service  Enterprise  Group  Incorporated  on behalf of:
Turbogeneradores  Maracay,  C.A.  filed with the  Commission  on July 31,  1995;
Empresa  Distribuidora  de Energia Sur, S.A., filed with the Commission on April
22,  1997;  Empresa  Distribuidora  de  Energia  Norte,  S.A.,  filed  with  the
Commission  on April 22,  1997;  Companhia  Norte-Nordeste  de  Distribuicao  de
Energia  Electrica  filed with the  Commission  on October  22,  1997;  Turboven
Maracay Company filed with the Commission in October,  1998;  Turboven  Valencia
Company filed with the  Commission on October 15, 1998;  Turboven  Cagua Company
filed with the Commission on October 15, 1998;  Empresa  Distribuidora  La Plata
S.A.  filed with the  Commission  on November 4, 1998;  Chilquinta  Energia S.A.
filed with the  Commission  on June 8, 1999;  AES Parana  S.C.A.  filed with the
Commission  on July 12,  1999,  AES  Parana  Operations  S.R.L.  filed  with the
Commission on July 12, 1999; Luz del Sur S.A.A.  filed  electronically  with the
Commission  on September 14, 1999;  and Shanghai  Wei-Gang  Energy  Company Ltd.
Filed with the Commission on May 30, 2000.



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission