<PAGE> 1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION
ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec.240.14a-11(c) or sec.240.14a-12
</TABLE>
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: .......
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: ..........
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): ............
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ......................
(5) Total fee paid: .......................................................
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid: ...............................................
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: .........................
(3) Filing Party: .........................................................
(4) Date Filed: ...........................................................
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
[NACCO, Industries, Inc. logo]
5875 LANDERBROOK DRIVE
MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, OHIO 44124-4017
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting of stockholders of NACCO Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") will be held on Wednesday, May 12, 1999, at 9:00 A.M., at 5875
Landerbrook Drive, Mayfield Heights, Ohio, for the purpose of:
(1) Electing eleven directors for the ensuing year.
(2) Confirming the appointment of the independent certified public
accountants of the Company for the current fiscal year.
(3) Transacting such other business as may properly come before the
meeting.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 19, 1999 as
the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
CHARLES A. BITTENBENDER
Secretary
March 26, 1999
THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 IS BEING
MAILED TO STOCKHOLDERS CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH. THE ANNUAL REPORT CONTAINS
FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY, BUT IS NOT INCORPORATED INTO
THE PROXY STATEMENT AND IS NOT DEEMED TO BE A PART OF THE PROXY SOLICITING
MATERIAL.
------------------------
PLEASE PROMPTLY FILL OUT, SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED FORM(S) OF PROXY
IF YOU DO NOT EXPECT TO BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING. IF YOU HOLD SHARES OF
BOTH CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND CLASS B COMMON STOCK, TWO FORMS OF PROXY ARE
ENCLOSED AND BOTH SHOULD BE FILLED OUT AND RETURNED. A SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE
IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE UNITED
STATES.
<PAGE> 3
[NACCO, Industries, Inc. logo]
5875 LANDERBROOK DRIVE
MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, OHIO 44124-4017
PROXY STATEMENT -- MARCH 26, 1999
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by
the directors of NACCO Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
of proxies to be used at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company to be
held on May 12, 1999 (the "Annual Meeting"). This Proxy Statement and the
related form(s) of proxy are being mailed to stockholders commencing on or about
March 26, 1999.
If the enclosed form(s) of proxy are executed and returned, the shares
represented by them will be voted as directed on all matters properly coming
before the Annual Meeting for a vote. Proxies that are properly signed without
any indication of voting instructions will be voted for the election of each
director nominee and for the confirmation of the appointment of the independent
certified public accountants. The proxies may be revoked at any time prior to
their exercise by giving notice to the Company in writing or by a later executed
proxy. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke a proxy,
but a stockholder attending the Annual Meeting may request a ballot and vote in
person, thereby revoking a previously granted proxy.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 19, 1999 will be
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On that date, the Company had
outstanding and entitled to vote 6,502,766 shares of Class A Common Stock, par
value $1.00 per share ("Class A Common"), and 1,651,297 shares of Class B Common
Stock, par value $1.00 per share ("Class B Common"). Each share of Class A
Common is entitled to one vote for a nominee for each of the eleven
directorships to be filled and one vote on each other matter brought before the
Annual Meeting. Each share of Class B Common is entitled to ten votes for each
such nominee and ten votes on each other matter brought before the Annual
Meeting.
At the Annual Meeting, in accordance with Delaware law and the Company's
By-Laws, the inspectors of election appointed by the Board of Directors for the
Annual Meeting shall determine the presence of a quorum and shall tabulate the
results of stockholder voting. As provided by Delaware law and the Company's
By-Laws, the holders of a majority of the Company's stock, issued and
outstanding, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and present in person or
by proxy at the Annual Meeting, shall constitute a quorum for such meeting. The
inspectors of election intend to treat properly executed proxies marked
"abstain" as "present" for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been
achieved at the Annual Meeting. Such inspectors shall also treat proxies held in
"street name" by brokers that are not voted on all proposals to come before the
Annual Meeting ("broker non-votes") as "present."
Class A Common and Class B Common will vote as a single class on all
matters anticipated to be brought before the Annual Meeting. In accordance with
Delaware law, nominees for election as directors receiving the greatest number
of votes will be elected directors. In accordance with Delaware law and the
Company's By-Laws, the holders of a majority of the Company's stock which has
voting power present in person or by proxy, and which is actually voted, shall
decide any other proposal which is brought before the Annual Meeting. As a
result, abstentions in respect of any proposal and broker non-votes will not be
counted for purposes of determining whether such proposal has received the
requisite approval by the Company's stockholders.
In accordance with Delaware law and the Company's By-Laws, the Company may,
by a vote of the stockholders, adjourn the Annual Meeting to a later date or
dates, without changing the record date. If the Company were to determine that
an adjournment were desirable, the appointed proxies would use the discretionary
authority granted pursuant to the proxy cards to vote in favor of such an
adjournment.
2
<PAGE> 4
BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED
The Board of Directors will present two proposals to the stockholders of
the Company at the Annual Meeting. Information concerning the first proposal,
"Election of Directors", is found on pages 3 to 24 of this Proxy Statement.
Information concerning the second proposal, "Confirmation of Appointment of
Independent Certified Public Accountants", is found on page 24 of this Proxy
Statement.
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
It is intended that shares represented by proxies in the enclosed form(s)
will be voted for the election of the nominees named in the following table to
serve as directors for a term of one year and until their successors are
elected, unless contrary instructions are received. All of the nominees listed
below presently serve as directors of the Company and, except for Richard de J.
Osborne, were elected at the Company's 1998 annual meeting of stockholders. If
an unexpected occurrence should make it necessary, in the judgment of the proxy
holders, to substitute some other person for any of the nominees, such shares
will be voted for such other person as the proxy holders may select.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE DURING LAST FIVE YEARS AND DIRECTOR
NAME AGE OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS IN PUBLIC COMPANIES SINCE
---- --- ------------------------------------------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Owsley Brown II 56 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of 1993
Brown-Forman Corporation (a diversified producer
and marketer of consumer products). From prior to
1994 to 1995, President of Brown-Forman
Corporation. Also director of Brown-Forman
Corporation, LG&E Energy Corp. and Louisville Gas
and Electric Company.
Robert M. Gates 55 Consultant, author and lecturer. Former Director 1993
of Central Intelligence for the United States.
Former Assistant to the President of the United
States and Deputy for National Security Affairs,
National Security Council. Also director of
LucasVarity plc and TRW Inc., and trustee of
Fidelity Funds.
Leon J. Hendrix, Jr. 57 Principal, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. 1995
(private investment firm); Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Remington Arms Co. (a
manufacturer and marketer of sporting arms and
ammunition). Also director of Cambrex Corp.,
Keithley Instruments, Inc., Remington Arms Co.
and Riverwood International Corp.
Dennis W. LaBarre 56 Partner in the law firm of Jones, Day, Reavis & 1982
Pogue.
Richard de J. Osborne 65 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ASARCO 1998
Incorporated. From prior to 1994 to 1998,
President of ASARCO Incorporated. Also director
of ASARCO Incorporated, Southern Peru Copper
Corporation, The BFGoodrich Company, Birmingham
Steel Corporation and Schering-Plough
Corporation.
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. 57 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 1972
of the Company. From prior to 1994 to 1994,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company. Also director of The BFGoodrich Company,
The Standard Products Company and The Vanguard
Group.
Ian M. Ross 71 President Emeritus of AT&T Bell Laboratories (the 1995
research and development subsidiary of AT&T).
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE> 5
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE DURING LAST FIVE YEARS AND DIRECTOR
NAME AGE OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS IN PUBLIC COMPANIES SINCE
---- --- ------------------------------------------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
John C. Sawhill 62 President and Chief Executive Officer of The 1990
Nature Conservancy (a non-profit conservation
organization). Also director of PG&E Corporation,
The Procter & Gamble Company, The Vanguard Group
and Newfield Exploration Company. Previously
director of the Company, 1978 to 1980.
Britton T. Taplin 42 Principal, Western Skies Group, Inc. (a developer 1992
of medical office and health care-related
facilities).
David F. Taplin 49 Self-employed (farming). 1997
John F. Turben 63 Chairman of the Board of Kirtland Capital 1997
Corporation (private investment partnership).
Also director of PVC Container Corporation, The
Hickory Group and Unifrax Corporation.
</TABLE>
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLASS A COMMON AND CLASS B COMMON
Set forth in the following table is the indicated information as of
December 31, 1998 (except as otherwise indicated) with respect to (1) each
person who is known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five
percent of the Class A Common, (2) each person who is known to the Company to be
the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Class B Common and (3) the
beneficial ownership of Class A Common and Class B Common by the directors, the
Company's Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated
executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries during 1998 (the "Named
Executive Officers") and all executive officers and directors as a group.
Beneficial ownership of Class A Common and Class B Common has been determined
for this purpose in accordance with Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act"), which provide, among other things, that (a) a person is deemed
to be the beneficial owner of Class A Common or Class B Common if such person,
directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or investment power with
respect to such stock or has the right to acquire such ownership within 60 days,
and (b) when two or more persons agree to act together for the purpose of
holding, voting or disposing of Class A Common or Class B Common, as the case
may be, the group formed thereby is deemed to be a person which has acquired
beneficial ownership of all Class A Common or Class B Common, as the case may
be, beneficially owned by each member of the group. Accordingly, the amounts
shown in the table do not purport to represent beneficial ownership for any
purpose other than compliance with SEC reporting requirements. Further,
beneficial ownership as determined in this manner does not necessarily bear on
the economic incidence of ownership of Class A Common or Class B Common.
4
<PAGE> 6
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SOLE
VOTING SHARED
AND VOTING OR PERCENT
TITLE OF INVESTMENT INVESTMENT AGGREGATE OF CLASS
NAME CLASS POWER POWER AMOUNT (1)(2)
---- -------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Clara Taplin Rankin, et al. (3) Class B (3) (3) 1,542,757(3) 93.41%
c/o KeyCorp Shareholder
Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 6477
Cleveland, OH 44101
Clara Taplin Rankin Class A -- 752,295(5)(6) 752,295(5)(6) 11.63%
3151 Chagrin River Road Class B -- 479,371(3)(4)(6) 479,371(3)(4)(6) 29.02%
Chagrin Falls, OH 44022
Rankin Associates I, L.P., et al.
(4) Class B (3)(4) (3)(4) 472,371(3)(4) 28.60%
Suite 300
5875 Landerbrook Drive
Mayfield Hts., OH 44124-4017
Rankin Associates II, L.P., et al.
(5) Class A (5) (5) 738,295(5) 11.41%
Suite 300
5875 Landerbrook Drive
Mayfield Hts., OH 44124-4017
Thomas E. Taplin Class A 524,000 14,000(6) 538,000(6) 8.32%
950 South Cherry St. #506 Class B 310,000(3) 7,000(3)(6) 317,000(3)(6) 19.19%
Denver, CO 80246
Maverick Capital, Ltd. (7) Class A 357,100 357,100 5.52%
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1850
Dallas, TX 75201
Frank E. Taplin, Jr. Class A 340,620 14,000(6) 354,620(6) 5.48%
55 Armour Road Class B 284,728(3) 7,000(3)(6) 291,728(3)(6) 17.66%
Princeton, NJ 08540
Owsley Brown II Class A 2,097 1,000(9) 3,138(8)(9) --
Class B -- -- -- --
Robert M. Gates Class A 1,216 -- 1,257(8) --
Class B -- -- -- --
Leon J. Hendrix, Jr. Class A 2,746 -- 2,850(8) --
Class B -- -- -- --
Dennis W. LaBarre Class A 2,030 -- 2,071(8) --
Class B 100 -- 100 --
Richard de J. Osborne Class A 200 -- 241(8) --
Class B -- -- -- --
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. Class A 128,243 880,991(5)(9) 1,034,234(5)(8)(9) 15.93%
Class B -- 478,427(3)(4)(9) 478,427(3)(4)(9) 28.97%
Ian M. Ross Class A 1,155 -- 1,196(8) --
Class B -- -- -- --
John C. Sawhill Class A 6,411 -- 6,505(8) 0.10%
Class B -- -- -- --
Britton T. Taplin Class A 11,032 -- 11,073(8) 0.17%
Class B 27,495(3) -- 27,495(3) 1.66%
David F. Taplin Class A 21,154 24,686 45,881(8) 0.71%
Class B 13,550(3) -- 13,550(3) 0.82%
John F. Turben Class A 1,746 -- 1,787(8) --
Class B -- -- -- --
Reginald R. Eklund Class A -- 1,000 1,000 --
Class B -- -- -- --
Richard E. Posey Class A -- -- -- --
Class B -- -- -- --
Clifford R. Miercort Class A -- -- -- --
Class B 1,000 -- 1,000 --
Frank G. Muller Class A 678 -- 678 --
Class B -- -- -- --
All executive officers and Class A 192,630 916,295(5)(9) 1,134,451(5)(8)(9) 17.47%
directors as a group (40 persons) Class B 44,565(3)(4) 479,947(3)(4)(9) 524,512(3)(4)(9) 31.76%
</TABLE>
5
<PAGE> 7
- ---------------
(1) The shares included in note (8) were deemed to be outstanding as of December
31, 1998 for purposes of calculating the percentage owned at such date by
such person or group designated by note (8) pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the
Exchange Act.
(2) Less than 0.1%, except as otherwise indicated.
(3) A Schedule 13D filed with the SEC with respect to Class B Common on March
29, 1990, as amended and amended and restated from time to time, most
recently on March 25, 1999 by Amendment No. 6 to the amended and restated
Schedule 13D, reported that the following individuals and entities, together
in certain cases with related revocable trusts and custodianships: Clara
Taplin Rankin, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., Victoire G. Rankin, Helen R. Butler,
Clara T. Rankin, Thomas T. Rankin, Matthew M. Rankin, Claiborne R. Rankin,
Chloe O. Rankin, Roger F. Rankin, Bruce T. Rankin, Frank E. Taplin, Jr.,
Margaret E. Taplin, Martha S. Kelly, Susan Sichel, Jennifer T. Jerome,
Caroline T. Ruschell, David F. Taplin, Thomas E. Taplin, Beatrice B. Taplin,
Thomas E. Taplin, Jr., Theodore D. Taplin, Britton T. Taplin, Frank F.
Taplin, Alison A. Rankin, Corbin Rankin, J.C. Butler, Jr., Rankin Associates
I, L.P. (the "Partnership"), Rankin Associates II, L.P. ("Associates"),
Rankin Management, Inc. ("RMI") and National City Bank, as trustee of
certain trusts for the benefit of certain individuals named above, their
family members and others (collectively, together with such individuals,
revocable trusts and custodianships, the "Signatories"), are parties with
the Company and KeyCorp Shareholder Services, Inc. (successor to Society
National Bank), as depository, to a Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of
March 15, 1990, as amended, covering the shares of Class B Common
beneficially owned by each of the Signatories (the "Stockholders'
Agreement"). The Stockholders' Agreement requires that each Signatory, prior
to any conversion of such Signatory's shares of Class B Common into Class A
Common or prior to any sale or transfer of Class B Common to any permitted
transferee (under the terms of the Class B Common) who has not become a
Signatory, offer such shares to all of the other Signatories on a pro-rata
basis. A Signatory may sell or transfer all shares not purchased under the
right of first refusal as long as they first are converted into Class A
Common prior to their sale or transfer. Accordingly, the Signatories may be
deemed to have acquired beneficial ownership of all of the Class B Common
subject to the Stockholders' Agreement, an aggregate of 1,542,757 shares, as
a "group" as defined under the Exchange Act. The shares subject to the
Stockholders' Agreement constitute 93.41% of the Class B Common outstanding
on December 31, 1998, or 67.12% of the combined voting power of all Class A
Common and Class B Common outstanding on such date. Certain Signatories own
Class A Common, which is not subject to the Stockholders' Agreement. Under
the Stockholders' Agreement, the Company may, but is not obligated to, buy
any of the shares of Class B Common not purchased by the Signatories
following the trigger of the right of first refusal. The Stockholders'
Agreement does not restrict in any respect how a Signatory may vote such
Signatory's shares of Class B Common. The Class B Common shown in the
foregoing table as beneficially owned by named persons who are Signatories
is subject to the Stockholders' Agreement.
(4) A Schedule 13D filed with the SEC with respect to Class B Common on November
25, 1996, and amended from time to time, most recently on January 10, 1997
by Amendment No. 2, reported that the following individuals and entities:
Clara Taplin Rankin, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., Thomas T. Rankin, Claiborne R.
Rankin, Roger F. Rankin, Bruce T. Rankin, Victoire G. Rankin, RMI and the
Partnership (collectively, the "Class B Parties" and all the Class B
Parties, except the Partnership, the "Class B Partners"), may be deemed as a
group to have acquired and to beneficially own 472,371 shares of Class B
Common, representing 28.60% of the outstanding Class B Common as of December
31, 1998. Although the Partnership holds the 472,371 shares of Class B
Common, which were contributed by the Class B Partners, it does not have any
power to vote or to dispose of such shares of Class B Common. RMI has the
sole power to vote such shares and shares the power to dispose of such
shares with the other Class B Partners. RMI exercises such powers by action
of its board of directors, which acts by majority vote and consists of
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., Thomas T. Rankin, Claiborne R. Rankin and Roger F.
Rankin, the shareholders of RMI. Under the terms of the Limited Partnership
Agreement of Rankin Associates I, L.P. (the "Class B Partnership
Agreement"), the Partnership may not dispose of Class B Common without the
consent of RMI and the approval of the holders of more than 75% of all
Partnership interests.
6
<PAGE> 8
The Shareholders' Agreement among the shareholders of RMI, the Articles of
Incorporation of RMI and the Class B Partnership Agreement restrict the
transfer of RMI shares and Partnership interests by RMI's shareholders and
the Class B Partners and provide such persons with a right of first refusal
to acquire RMI shares or Partnership interests which an RMI shareholder or a
Class B Partner desires to sell and a call right to compel the sale of RMI
shares or Partnership interests held by RMI shareholders or the Class B
Partners who are not members of a "Family Group," consisting of one of Clara
Taplin Rankin's sons, his spouse and their descendants. The Class B Common
beneficially owned by each of the Class B Partners and the Partnership is
also subject to the Stockholders' Agreement described in note (3).
(5) A Schedule 13D filed with the SEC with respect to Class A Common on February
18, 1998, and amended from time to time, most recently on January 11, 1999
by Amendment No. 3, reported that the following individuals and entities:
Clara Taplin Rankin, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., Thomas T. Rankin, Claiborne R.
Rankin, Roger F. Rankin, Bruce T. Rankin, Matthew M. Rankin, James T.
Rankin, Alison A. Rankin, John C. Butler, Jr., Victoire G. Rankin, Corbin
Rankin, Chloe O. Rankin, RMI and Associates (collectively, the "Class A
Parties" and all the Class A Parties except Associates, the "Class A
Partners"), may be deemed as a group to have acquired and to beneficially
own 738,295 shares of Class A Common, representing 11.41% of the outstanding
Class A Common as of December 31, 1998. Although Associates holds the
738,295 shares of Class A Common, which were contributed by the Class A
Partners, it does not have any power to vote or to dispose of such shares of
Class A Common. RMI has the sole power to vote such shares and shares the
power to dispose of such shares with the other Class A Partners. RMI
exercises such powers by action of its board of directors, which acts by
majority vote. Under the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement of
Rankin Associates II, L.P. (the "Class A Partnership Agreement"), Associates
may not dispose of Class A Common without the consent of RMI and the
approval of the holders of more than 75% of all partnership interests in
Associates. The Shareholders' Agreement among the shareholders of RMI, the
Articles of Incorporation of RMI and the Class A Partnership Agreement
restrict the transfer of RMI shares and partnership interests in Associates
by RMI's shareholders and the Class A Partners and provide such persons with
a right of first refusal to acquire RMI shares or partnership interests in
Associates which an RMI shareholder or a Class A Partner desires to sell and
a call right to compel the sale of RMI shares or partnership interests in
Associates held by RMI shareholders or the Class A Partners who are not
members of a "Family Group," consisting of one of Clara Taplin Rankin's
sons, his spouse and their descendants. The Class A Common shown in the
foregoing table as beneficially owned by each of the Class A Partners
includes the shares of Class A Common that are subject to the Class A
Partnership Agreement.
(6) Clara Taplin Rankin, Frank E. Taplin, Jr. and Thomas E. Taplin are
co-settlors of a trust holding an aggregate of 42,000 shares of Class A
Common and 21,000 shares of Class B Common, in which each retains a
reversionary interest with respect to 14,000 of such shares of Class A
Common and 7,000 of such shares of Class B Common. The Class B Common held
by the foregoing trust is subject to the Stockholders' Agreement described
in note (3).
(7) A Schedule 13G filed with the SEC with respect to Class A Common on February
26, 1999 reported that Maverick Capital, Ltd., a Texas corporation, is the
beneficial owner of the shares of Class A Common reported herein as a result
of acting as an investment adviser in accordance with Rule
13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E) of the SEC under the Exchange Act.
(8) Includes the following shares which such persons have, or had, within 60
days after December 31, 1998, the right to acquire upon the exercise of
stock options: Mr. Rankin 25,000 shares of Class A Common; and all executive
officers and directors as a group, 25,000 shares of Class A Common. Also
includes the following shares which the directors have, or had, within 60
days after December 31, 1998, the right to acquire pursuant to the Company's
Non-Employee Directors' Equity Compensation Plan for payment of director's
fees: Mr. Brown, 41 shares of Class A Common; Mr. Gates, 41 shares of Class
A Common; Mr. Hendrix, 104 shares of Class A Common; Mr. LaBarre, 41 shares
of Class A Common; Mr. Osborne, 41 shares of Class A Common; Dr. Ross, 41
shares of Class A Common; Mr. Sawhill, 94 shares of Class A Common; Mr.
Britton T. Taplin, 41 shares of Class A Common; Mr. David F. Taplin, 41
shares
7
<PAGE> 9
of Class A Common; and Mr. Turben, 41 shares of Class A Common; and all
executive officers and directors as a group, 526 shares of Class A Common.
(9) Includes the following number of shares as to which certain directors and
executive officers disclaim beneficial ownership: (a) 870,814 shares of
Class A Common and 373,629 shares of Class B Common held by (i) members of
Mr. Rankin's family, (ii) charitable trusts, (iii) trusts for the benefit of
members of Mr. Rankin's family and (iv) to the extent in excess of Mr.
Rankin's pecuniary interest in such entities, the Partnership and
Associates; (b) 1,000 shares of Class A Common held by Mr. Brown's spouse;
and (c) with respect to all executive officers and directors as a group,
872,064 shares of Class A Common and 373,754 shares of Class B Common held
by family members and as described in (a) above.
Frank E. Taplin, Jr. and Thomas E. Taplin are brothers, and Clara Taplin
Rankin is their sister. Britton T. Taplin is the son of Thomas E. Taplin, and
David F. Taplin is the son of Frank E. Taplin, Jr. Clara Taplin Rankin is the
mother of Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., and J.C. Butler, Jr., an executive officer of
the Company, is the son-in-law of Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. The combined beneficial
ownership of such persons shown in the foregoing table (including shares as to
which such persons had the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days
after December 31, 1998) equals 2,000,840 shares or 30.81% of Class A Common and
1,135,200 shares or 68.73% of Class B Common outstanding on December 31, 1998
(including shares deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating the
percentage owned pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act). The combined
beneficial ownership of all directors of the Company (including shares as to
which the directors had the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days
after December 31, 1998), together with Clara Taplin Rankin, Frank E. Taplin,
Jr., Thomas E. Taplin and all of the executive officers of the Company whose
beneficial ownership of Class A Common and Class B Common (including shares that
would be held by such executive officers if they exercised certain stock
options) must be disclosed in the foregoing table in accordance with Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, equals 2,041,071 shares or 31.43% of Class A Common and
1,140,240 shares or 69.04% of Class B Common outstanding on December 31, 1998
(including shares deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating the
percentage owned pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act). Such shares of
Class A Common and Class B Common together represent 58.42% of the combined
voting power of all Class A Common and Class B Common outstanding on such date
(including shares deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating the
percentage owned pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act).
There exists no arrangement or understanding between any director and any
other person pursuant to which such director was elected. Each director and
executive officer serves until his successor is elected and qualified.
DIRECTORS' MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee and a Nominating,
Organization and Compensation Committee (the "Nominating and Compensation
Committee"). During 1998, the members of the Audit Committee were Robert M.
Gates (Chairman), Leon J. Hendrix, Jr., Dennis W. LaBarre, Richard de J. Osborne
(beginning November 10, 1998), John C. Sawhill and Britton T. Taplin, and the
members of the Nominating and Compensation Committee were John J. Dwyer
(Chairman and a member of the Committee, through May 13, 1998), Robert M. Gates,
Ian M. Ross (Chairman, beginning May 13, 1998), Richard de J. Osborne (beginning
November 10, 1998), John C. Sawhill and John F. Turben. The other standing
committees of the Board of Directors are the Executive Committee, which during
1998 was comprised of John J. Dwyer (through May 13, 1998), Robert M. Gates
(beginning May 13, 1998), Dennis W. LaBarre, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. (Chairman),
Ian M. Ross (beginning May 13, 1998) and John C. Sawhill, and the Finance
Committee, which during 1998 was comprised of Leon J. Hendrix, Jr., Dennis W.
LaBarre, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., John C. Sawhill (Chairman), Britton T. Taplin,
David F. Taplin and John F. Turben.
The Audit Committee held four meetings in 1998. The Audit Committee
recommends to the Board of Directors, subject to stockholder approval, the
selection of the Company's independent certified public accountants. The Audit
Committee discusses with the internal auditors and the independent public
accountants the overall scope and specific plans for their respective audits.
The Audit Committee meets
8
<PAGE> 10
regularly with the Company's internal auditors and independent public
accountants to discuss the results of their respective examinations, their
evaluations of the Company's internal controls, and the Company's financial
reporting.
The Nominating and Compensation Committee held three meetings in 1998. The
Nominating and Compensation Committee reviews executive compensation, fixes
compensation of the executive officers and incentive compensation, recommends
the adoption of and administers all benefit plans, and grants stock options. The
Nominating and Compensation Committee also reviews and recommends to the Board
of Directors criteria for membership to the Board of Directors, reviews and
recommends to the Board of Directors the optimum number and qualifications of
directors believed to be desirable, has established and monitors a system to
receive suggestions for nominees to directorships of the Company, and identifies
and recommends to the Board of Directors specific candidates for membership to
the Board of Directors.
The Finance Committee held three meetings in 1998. The Finance Committee
reviews the financing and risk management strategies of the Company and its
principal subsidiaries and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors on
all matters concerning finance.
The Executive Committee held no meetings in 1998. The Executive Committee
may exercise all of the powers of the Board of Directors in the management and
control of the business of the Company during the intervals between meetings of
the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors held five meetings in 1998. All of the incumbent
directors attended at least 75 percent of the total meetings held by the Board
of Directors and by the committees on which they served during their tenure
during 1998.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Each director who is not an officer of the Company or its subsidiaries
receives a retainer of $30,000 for each calendar year for service on the Board
of Directors and on subsidiary boards of directors. In addition, each such
director receives $500 for attending each meeting of the Board of Directors and
each meeting of a committee thereof, as well as for each meeting of a subsidiary
board of directors or committee thereof on which such director serves. Such fees
for attendance at board meetings may not exceed $1,000 per day. In addition, the
chairman of each committee of the Board of Directors and the subsidiary boards
of directors receives $4,000 for each calendar year for service as committee
chairman. Under the Company's Non-Employee Directors' Equity Compensation Plan
(the "Non-Employee Directors' Plan"), each director who is not an officer of the
Company or its subsidiaries receives 50% of his annual retainer ($15,000) in
shares of Class A Common. These shares may not be assigned, pledged,
hypothecated or otherwise transferred by the director, voluntarily or
involuntarily, other than (a) by will or the laws of descent and distribution,
(b) pursuant to a qualifying domestic relations order, or (c) to a trust for the
benefit of the director, or his spouse, children or grandchildren. The foregoing
restrictions on transfer lapse upon the earliest to occur of (i) the date which
is ten years after the last day of the calendar quarter for which such shares
were earned, (ii) the date of the death or permanent disability of the director,
(iii) five years (or earlier with the approval of the Board of Directors) from
the date of the retirement of the director from the Board of Directors of the
Company, and (iv) the date that a director is both retired from the Board of
Directors of the Company and has reached 70 years of age. In addition, each
director has the right under the Non-Employee Directors' Plan to receive shares
of Class A Common in lieu of cash for up to 100% of the balance of his annual
retainer, meeting attendance fees and any committee chairman's fee. These
voluntary shares are not subject to the foregoing restrictions.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the annual, long-term and all other
compensation for services in all capacities to the Company of the Named
Executive Officers of the Company and its principal subsidiaries,
9
<PAGE> 11
NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. ("NMHG"), Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex,
Inc. ("Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex") and The North American Coal Corporation
("North American Coal").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
PAYOUTS
ANNUAL COMPENSATION ------------
------------------- LTIP ALL OTHER
FISCAL SALARY BONUS PAYOUTS COMPENSATION
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR ($) ($) ($) ($)
- --------------------------- ------ -------- -------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. 1998 $784,856(1) $637,680(2) $1,222,016(3) $491,051(4)(5)
Chairman, President and 1997 $742,400(1) $464,900(2) $ 855,452(3) $333,002(4)(5)
Chief Executive Officer 1996 $704,700(1) $290,400(2) $ 677,162(3) $275,201(4)(5)
of the Company
Reginald R. Eklund 1998 $437,200(1) $376,624(6) -- $154,303(7)
President and Chief 1997 $410,300(1) $249,154(6) -- $ 90,298(7)
Executive Officer of 1996 $394,808(1) $109,785(6) -- $ 69,712(7)
NMHG
Richard E. Posey 1998 $388,778(1) $237,300(8) -- $ 85,619(9)
President and Chief 1997 $372,604(1) $239,200(8) -- $ 85,093(9)
Executive Officer of 1996 $358,450(1) $170,500(8) -- $ 91,426(9)
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex
Clifford R. Miercort 1998 $360,770(1) $183,582(10) -- $ 57,239(11)
President and Chief 1997 $343,982(1) $166,100(10) -- $ 44,811(11)
Executive Officer of 1996 $325,520(1) $170,717(10) -- $ 32,466(11)
North American Coal
Frank G. Muller 1998 $279,574(1) $191,435(12) -- $ 93,350(13)
Vice President of NMHG, 1997 $254,800(1) $145,038(12) -- $ 52,710(13)
President of NMHG Americas 1996 $241,000(1) $ 55,807(12) -- $ 39,509(13)
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Under current disclosure requirements of the SEC certain of the amounts
listed are being reported as "Salary", although the Company considers them
as payments of cash in lieu of perquisites, which are at competitive levels
as determined by the Company's Nominating and Compensation Committee. For
Mr. Rankin, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 include payments of
cash in lieu of perquisites of $74,856, $72,400 and $69,700, respectively.
For Mr. Eklund, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 include payments
of cash in lieu of perquisites of $49,500, $46,300 and $44,800,
respectively. For Mr. Posey, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996
include payments of cash in lieu of perquisites of $35,570, $34,600 and
$33,400, respectively. For Mr. Miercort, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997
and 1996 include payments of cash in lieu of perquisites of $29,610,
$28,731 and $27,759, respectively. For Mr. Muller, the amounts listed for
1998, 1997 and 1996 include payments of cash in lieu of perquisites of
$27,270, $25,700 and $24,900, respectively.
(2) For Mr. Rankin, these amounts were paid in cash pursuant to the NACCO
Industries, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and the NACCO
Industries, Inc. Supplemental Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
(3) For Mr. Rankin, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 were distributed
in the form of 6,776, 7,614 and 7,912 shares of Class A Common and cash
payments in the amount of $427,856, $299,493 and $237,049, respectively.
The foregoing cash payments are intended to be the approximate amounts
required to be withheld by the Company and paid to applicable federal,
state and local income taxing authorities based upon statutorily determined
withholding rates. These amounts were distributed under the NACCO
Industries, Inc. Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the
"NACCO Long-Term Plan").
(4) For Mr. Rankin, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 include $4,000,
$4,000 and $3,750, respectively, consisting of matching contributions by
the Company under the NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. Profit Sharing
Plan (the "NMHG Profit Sharing Plan"); and $97,444, $66,038
10
<PAGE> 12
and $44,806, respectively, consisting of amounts credited and interest
under the NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan (the
"NMHG Unfunded Benefit Plan").
(5) For Mr. Rankin, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 include
$389,607, $262,964 and $226,645, respectively, consisting of amounts
credited and interest under The Retirement Benefit Plan for Alfred M.
Rankin, Jr.
(6) For Mr. Eklund, these amounts were paid in cash pursuant to the NACCO
Materials Handling Group, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
(7) For Mr. Eklund, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 include $20,000,
$20,300 and $17,639, respectively, consisting of contributions by NMHG
under the NMHG Profit Sharing Plan; and $134,303, $69,998 and $52,073,
respectively, consisting of amounts credited and interest under the NMHG
Unfunded Benefit Plan.
(8) For Mr. Posey, these amounts were paid in cash pursuant to the Hamilton
Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
(9) For Mr. Posey, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 include $19,653,
$17,744 and $1,500, respectively, consisting of contributions by Hamilton
Beach/Proctor-Silex under the Hamilton Beach/ Proctor-Silex Employees'
Retirement Savings Plan; $65,966, $48,003 and $0, respectively, consisting
of amounts credited and interest under the Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex,
Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan; and for 1997 and 1996 include $19,346 and
$89,926, respectively, for reimbursement of moving expenses.
(10) For Mr. Miercort, these amounts were paid in cash pursuant to The North
American Coal Corporation Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
(11) For Mr. Miercort, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 include
$8,000, $8,000 and $7,500, respectively, consisting of matching
contributions by North American Coal under The North American Coal Savings
Plan; and $49,239, $36,811, and $24,966, respectively, consisting of
amounts credited and interest under The North American Coal Deferred
Compensation Plan for Management Employees (the "North American Coal
Deferred Compensation Plan").
(12) For Mr. Muller, these amounts were paid in cash pursuant to the NACCO
Materials Handling Group, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
(13) For Mr. Muller, the amounts listed for 1998, 1997 and 1996 include $20,000,
$20,300 and $17,639, respectively, consisting of contributions by NMHG
under the NMHG Profit Sharing Plan; and $73,350, $32,410 and $21,870,
respectively, consisting of amounts credited and interest under the NMHG
Unfunded Benefit Plan.
STOCK OPTION GRANTS
The Company did not grant any stock options under the Company's 1975 Stock
Option Plan or 1981 Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plans") during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 to any person, including the Named Executive
Officers. The Company has not granted stock options since 1989 in the belief
that the likely value realized is unclear both in amount and in its relationship
to performance. There are no outstanding options to purchase shares of the
Company's Class B Common.
11
<PAGE> 13
STOCK OPTION EXERCISES AND FISCAL YEAR-END VALUES
The following table sets forth information for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998 with respect to the exercised and unexercised options to
purchase the Company's Class A Common granted to the Named Executive Officers in
prior years under the Stock Option Plans.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
SHARES OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR-END IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
ACQUIRED ON VALUE (#)(1) AT FISCAL YEAR-END ($)
EXERCISE REALIZED --------------------------- ---------------------------
NAME (#) ($) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. -- -- 25,000 -- $1,410,938 --
Reginald R. Eklund -- -- -- -- -- --
Richard E. Posey -- -- -- -- -- --
Clifford R. Miercort -- -- -- -- -- --
Frank G. Muller -- -- -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Shares of Class A Common.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS
The following table sets forth information concerning awards to the Named
Executive Officers during fiscal year 1998, and estimated payouts in the future,
under long-term incentive plans of the Company and its principal subsidiaries.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS -- AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
SHARES, PERFORMANCE ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER
UNITS OR OR OTHER NON-STOCK PRICE-BASED PLANS
OTHER PERIOD UNTIL ---------------------------------
RIGHTS MATURATION THRESHOLD TARGET MAXIMUM
NAME ($ OR #) OR PAYOUT ($ OR #) ($ OR #) ($ OR #)
---- ------------ ------------ --------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr.(1) $998,080 2 years $0 $998,080 $1,549,519
$998,080 5 years $0 $ 0 $ 572,648
Reginald R. Eklund(2) -- -- -- -- --
Richard E. Posey(3) -- -- -- -- --
Clifford R. Miercort(4) $201,565 1 year $0 $201,565 (4)
Frank G. Muller(2) -- -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Under the NACCO Long-Term Plan, participants, including Mr. Rankin, are
eligible for awards paid partly in shares of Class A Common and partly in
cash for performance against a target which is based upon the Company's
consolidated adjusted return on equity over multiple-year periods. Effective
January 1, 1998, participants were granted dollar-denominated target awards.
Final awards, if any, will be received in 2000 ("base period awards") based
upon the Company's consolidated adjusted return on equity for the period
from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1999 against a pre-established
target. Participants are also eligible to receive a supplemental payout on
such awards in 2003 ("consistent performance awards") based upon the
Company's consolidated adjusted return on equity performance for the 5-year
period from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2002 against the same
pre-established target. No consistent performance award is payable if the
Company's consolidated adjusted return on equity performance for the
relevant period is at or below target. The total amount of the base period
award and the consistent performance award paid to a participant in any
calendar year cannot exceed 200 percent of the base period target award.
Sixty-five percent of all payouts are distributed in shares of Class A
Common, with the number of shares based upon the average closing price of
Class A Common
12
<PAGE> 14
on the New York Stock Exchange at the end of each week during 1999 (in the
case of the base period awards) and 2002 (in the case of consistent
performance awards).
The shares of Class A Common issued as a portion of these awards under the
NACCO Long-Term Plan are fully vested but may not be transferred until the
earlier of (a) December 31, 2009, (b) the participant's death or disability,
or (c) five years after retirement. A participant may also request at any
time after three years that the Nominating and Compensation Committee
authorize the lapse of restrictions on up to 20% of shares issued under the
NACCO Long-Term Plan for the purchase of a principal residence or payments
of certain medical or educational expenses. Because the total value of a
final award is currently taxable as income to the participant, the balance
of the final award is paid in cash in an amount which is intended to be the
approximate amount required to be withheld by the Company and paid to
applicable federal, state and local income taxing authorities based upon
statutorily determined withholding rates.
(2) Messrs. Eklund and Muller are participants in the NACCO Materials Handling
Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the "NMHG Long-Term
Plan"). Under the NMHG Long-Term Plan, participants are awarded "book value
appreciation units" which vest ten years from the date of award, or earlier
in the event of the participant's death, permanent disability or retirement,
or in the event of any other termination of employment with the approval of
the NMHG Nominating, Organization and Compensation Committee. At any time
following the fifth anniversary of the date of an award, a participant may
also annually request that such Committee permit the vesting of up to (a)
20% of the number of book value appreciation units for the purchase of a
principal residence for the individual or the payment of certain medical or
educational expenses of the individual, his spouse or dependents or (b) 10%
of the number of book value appreciation units for any other purpose,
provided that such request may only apply to an aggregate of 40% of the
number of book value appreciation units originally granted in an award. Upon
vesting, the participant is entitled to receive a payment in cash equal to
the appreciation in the book value per unit from the base period price per
unit to the value of the book value unit at the end of the calendar quarter
immediately preceding the date of vesting, and vested book value units as to
which payment is made are canceled. The participant may elect to defer
receipt of all or part of any such payment, in which case the deferred
amount will be paid under the NMHG Unfunded Benefit Plan. There are no
threshold or maximum values for an award. Mr. Eklund was previously awarded
65,000 book value appreciation units effective on January 1, 1990, which
units will vest on December 31, 1999, 21,690 book value appreciation units
effective on January 1, 1993, which units will vest on December 31, 2002,
100,403 book value appreciation units effective January 1, 1994, which units
will vest on December 31, 2003, and 52,645 book value appreciation units
effective on January 1, 1998, which units will vest on December 31, 2007.
Mr. Muller was previously awarded 15,154 book value appreciation units
effective on January 1, 1990, which units will vest on December 31, 1999,
3,958 book value appreciation units effective on January 1, 1993, which
units will vest on December 31, 2002, 31,739 book value appreciation units
effective on July 1, 1993, which units will vest on June 30, 2002, 43,558
book value appreciation units effective on January 1, 1994, which units will
vest on December 31, 2003, and 20,887 book value appreciation units
effective on January 1, 1998, which units will vest on December 31, 2007.
(3) Mr. Posey is a participant in the Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the "HBPS Long-Term Plan"). Under the
HBPS Long-Term Plan, participants are awarded "book value appreciation
units" which vest ten years from the date of award, or earlier in the event
of the participant's death, permanent disability or retirement, or in the
event of any other termination of employment with the approval of the
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex Nominating, Organization and Compensation
Committee. At any time following the fifth anniversary of the date of an
award, a participant may also annually request that such Committee permit
the vesting of up to (a) 20% of the number of book value appreciation units
for the purchase of a principal residence for the individual or the payment
of certain medical or educational expenses of the individual, his spouse or
dependents or (b) 10% of the number of book value appreciation units for any
other purpose, provided that such request may only apply to an aggregate of
40% of the number of book value appreciation units originally granted in an
award. Upon vesting, the participant is entitled to receive a payment in
cash equal to the
13
<PAGE> 15
appreciation in the book value per unit from the base period price per unit
to the value of the book value unit at the end of the calendar quarter
immediately preceding the date of vesting, and vested book value units as to
which payment is made are canceled. There are no threshold or maximum values
for an award. Mr. Posey was previously awarded 166,240 book value
appreciation units effective on October 1, 1995, which units will vest on
September 30, 2005, and 94,240 book value appreciation units effective on
January 1, 1998, which units will vest on December 31, 2007.
(4) Effective on January 1, 1990, Mr. Miercort was awarded the right to
participate in The North American Coal Corporation Value Appreciation Plan
(the "North American Coal Long-Term Plan") at a rate equal to a specified
percentage of his salary range midpoint, as determined by the North American
Coal Nominating, Organization and Compensation Committee. When the North
American Coal Long-Term Plan was adopted, the North American Coal
Nominating, Organization and Compensation Committee set net income
appreciation goals which are based upon achieving underlying year-by-year
targets for each year during the ten-year term of the Plan. These goals are
adjusted each year for inflation and to take into account any "new projects"
initiated in the interim. Once a plan year is completed, the actual net
income during that plan year is measured against the adjusted net income
goal for that plan year to determine the annual net income appreciation of
current and new projects (the "Annual Factor"). Similarly, actual cumulative
net income for the term of the Plan to date is measured against the
cumulative adjusted net income goals to date to determine the cumulative net
income appreciation of current and new projects (the "Cumulative Factor")
against the ten-year target.
When the Plan was adopted, the Committee also set a goal for the cumulative
net income appreciation due to new projects over the term of the Plan. At
the end of each plan year, the present value of expected cumulative net
income appreciation of all new projects initiated during that year is
measured against the cumulative new project goal to determine the net income
appreciation due to the acquisition of new projects (the "New Project
Factor"). In addition, if it is determined in any plan year (an "Adjustment
Year") that a new project has provided significantly less net income
appreciation than originally expected, then the amount of any prior award
previously attributed to that project as the result of a prior year's New
Project Factor will reduce the New Project Factor in the Adjustment Year
(the "New Project Adjustment"). If the New Project Adjustment is large
enough, it is possible for participants to receive negative awards in a
given year.
At the start of each year during the ten-year term of the Plan, a target
award is set for each participant as a percentage of salary midpoint. The
amount shown for Mr. Miercort represents the target award which is based
upon his salary range midpoint for 1999. Following the end of the year,
this target amount is adjusted by the Annual Factor, the Cumulative Factor
and the New Project Factor. In addition, the New Project Adjustment is
made, if applicable. Target amounts as so adjusted are credited or debited
to an account for the benefit of the participant, which earns interest
based upon the average monthly rate of ten-year U.S. Treasury Bonds. There
are no threshold or maximum values for an award. All amounts in these
accounts vest at the rate of 10% each year, and become fully vested on
December 31, 1999. Vested amounts are payable in cash on the earlier of
December 31, 1999, or the participant's death, disability, retirement or
other reasons within the discretion of the North American Coal Nominating,
Organization and Compensation Committee. The participant may elect to defer
receipt of all or part of such amounts, in which case the deferred amount
will be paid under The North American Coal Deferred Compensation Plan.
Earlier payments of vested amounts may be permitted within the discretion
of the North American Coal Nominating, Organization and Compensation
Committee in the event of a financial hardship or unforeseen financial
emergency.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Nominating and Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of
Directors and the Nominating, Organization and Compensation Committees of the
Company's subsidiary boards of directors (collectively, the "Compensation
Committee") have furnished the following report on executive compensation. The
members of the Nominating and Compensation Committee for 1998 were, John J.
Dwyer (Chairman and a member of the Committee, through May 13, 1998), Robert M.
Gates, Ian M. Ross (Chairman, beginning May 13, 1998), Richard de J. Osborne
(beginning November 10, 1998), John C. Sawhill and John F. Turben.
14
<PAGE> 16
The members of the Nominating, Organization and Compensation Committees of the
Company's principal subsidiaries, NMHG, Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex and North
American Coal consist of these individuals, as well as Dennis W. LaBarre and
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. Messrs. LaBarre and Rankin are not members of the
Nominating and Compensation Committee of the Company, and their participation in
this report is limited to the portions of the report relating to the Company's
subsidiaries.
COMPENSATION POLICY
The guiding principle of the executive compensation program of the Company
and its subsidiaries in recent years has been the maintenance of a strong link
between an executive officer's compensation and individual performance and the
performance of the Company or the subsidiary for which the executive officer has
responsibility. Comprehensively defined target total compensation is established
for each executive officer position following rigorous evaluation standards to
ensure internal equity. Such total compensation is targeted explicitly in dollar
terms as the sum of base salary plus perquisites, short-term incentives and
long-term incentives. While the Company offers opportunities for its executive
officers to earn truly superior compensation for outstanding results, this link
includes significantly reduced compensation for weak results.
In accordance with the foregoing philosophy, the Compensation Committee
approves a mix of base salaries and incentive plans for each executive officer
such that base salary levels are at levels appropriate to allow incentive plans
to serve as significant motivating factors. Base salary and incentive
compensation levels for each officer are based upon the recommendations of the
Company's independent outside compensation consultant, which bases its
recommendations upon an analysis of similar positions at a broad range of
domestic industries, as well as an understanding of the Company's philosophy, as
summarized above. Incentive-based compensation plans are designed to provide
significant rewards for achieving or surpassing annual operating and financial
performance objectives, as well as to align the compensation interests of
executive officers with the long-term interests of stockholders by basing a
substantial portion of the incentive compensation package upon adjusted return
on equity performance and book value appreciation rather than on cyclical
movements in stock price. Finally, in addition to providing certain other
perquisites, target levels of perquisites for executive officers are converted
into fixed dollar amounts and paid in cash, an approach which recognizes that
perquisites are largely just another form of compensation, albeit separate and
distinct from salary and incentive compensation.
The Company has not granted stock options since 1989 in the belief that the
likely value realized is unclear both in amount and in its relationship to
performance. If management ultimately determines that any changes in the federal
income tax laws significantly diminish or otherwise undercut the incentives
intended to be created by the NACCO Long-Term Plan, the Company may reconsider
its previously announced intention to not make further awards under its Stock
Option Plans.
In sum, the executive compensation program at the Company and its
subsidiaries is designed to reward executive officers with competitive total
compensation for achievement of specific corporate and individual goals, while
at the same time making them long-term stakeholders in the Company. In years
when the Company has lower financial results, payouts under the incentive
components of the Company's compensation plans will reflect these results. In
years when the Company has better financial results, payouts under the incentive
components of the Company's compensation plans will be greater. The Company
believes that over time the program will encourage executive officers to earn
incentive pay significantly greater than 100% of target by delivering
outstanding managerial performance.
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, a
public company is generally denied deductions for compensation paid to the chief
executive officer and the other four most highly compensated executive officers
to the extent that the compensation for any of such individuals exceeds one
million dollars for the taxable year. An exception to this general rule exists
for payments that are made for attainment of one or more performance goals
meeting certain criteria. In response to this law and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, the stockholders of the Company have approved the NACCO
Industries, Inc. Supplemental Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the
"Supplemental Short-Term Plan") and the NACCO Long-Term Plan. Both plans were
designed so that, together with steps taken by the Compensation
15
<PAGE> 17
Committee in the administration of the plans, payouts on awards made under the
plans should not count towards the one million dollar cap which the law imposes
for purposes of federal income tax deductibility. While the Compensation
Committee intends to preserve the deductibility of compensation payable to the
Company's executive officers, deductibility will be only one among a number of
factors considered in determining appropriate levels or modes of compensation.
The Company intends to maintain the flexibility to compensate executive officers
based upon an overall determination of what it believes is in the best interests
of the Company and its stockholders.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND COMPANY PERFORMANCE
The three main elements of the Company's executive compensation program --
base salary, short-term incentive compensation and long-term incentive
compensation -- are carefully reviewed by the Compensation Committee as to their
relationship to the performance of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Base Salary. To assist the Compensation Committee in fixing base salary
levels which are at adequately competitive levels, an independent outside
consultant analyzes a survey of a broad group of domestic industrial
organizations from all segments of industry ranging in size from under $150
million to over $5 billion in annual revenues. Organizations participate in the
survey based upon their voluntary submission of data to the independent
consultant, as well as their ability to pass the consultant's quality assurance
controls. For 1998, participants included 378 parent organizations and 580
independent operating units. Comparing positions of similar scope and
complexity, the consultant derives a median salary level for each executive
officer position at the Company and its principal subsidiaries and provides that
information to the Compensation Committee. All information provided to the
Compensation Committee is on an industry-wide basis as opposed to a comparison
with individual companies that may compete with the Company and its principal
subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee uses the median, or salary midpoint
("Salary Midpoint"), for purposes of determining the salary range for each
executive officer. The Compensation Committee then sets the salary for each
executive officer, which is within the salary range, and is dependent upon
additional factors such as the executive officer's performance.
Because the Compensation Committee uses Salary Midpoints based on studies
of domestic industrial organizations from all segments of industry, the Company
does not believe that there is a meaningful relationship between executive
salary levels of each subsidiary determined by the Compensation Committee and
the executive salary levels of the companies that make up the S&P Diversified
Machinery Index. That index, which is used by the Company as the published
industry index for comparison to the Company's stock price performance, was
chosen because NMHG is the Company's largest subsidiary in terms of asset value
and revenues.
Short-Term Incentive Compensation. At the beginning of 1998, the
Compensation Committee adopted target performance levels for consolidated
adjusted return on equity for the Company (upon which awards under the Company's
Supplemental Short-Term Plan are based), and various performance criteria for
the Company's subsidiaries such as net income, return on equity in properly
capitalized tangible assets, market share, sales development and support costs
(depending on the business unit) (upon which awards under the Company's Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Short-Term Plan") and the annual incentive
compensation plans of the Company's subsidiaries are based) for that year. The
short-term incentive plans for the Company and its subsidiaries essentially
follow the same basic pattern for award determination. Performance targets are
established within the Compensation Committee's discretion, and are generally
based upon management's recommendations as to the performance objectives of the
particular business for the year. Target awards for executive officers are
established at specified percentages of each individual's Salary Midpoint.
Final awards for each individual under the short-term incentive plans of
the Company and its subsidiaries are based on the individual's target award,
adjusted for performance by the business unit against the established targets,
and for all such plans except the Supplemental Short-Term Plan for performance
by the individual against individual goals. The Compensation Committee, in its
discretion, may also increase or decrease awards under all such plans (except
for the Supplemental Short-Term Plan pursuant to which
16
<PAGE> 18
awards may be decreased, but not increased), and may approve the payment of
awards where business unit performance would otherwise not meet the minimum
criteria set for payment of awards. In no event will short-term incentive
payments exceed 150% of the target amount.
The short-term annual incentive plans of the Company and its subsidiaries
provide target compensation of 20% to 75% of Salary Midpoint, depending on the
executive officer's position. Although it varies by business unit, target awards
generally are tied to the annual operating and financial targets for the
particular business unit, and in most cases, to longer-term objectives such as
long-term adjusted return on equity performance targets for the business unit.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. For 1998, the long-term incentive
compensation plans for the Company and its subsidiaries, established at target
performance levels by the Compensation Committee, were designed to provide the
equivalent of 10% to 145% of Salary Midpoint (unless the amount is currently
taxable, in which case the targets are adjusted accordingly).
The long-term incentive compensation plan for the parent holding company
uses the Company's consolidated adjusted return on equity as a measure of
incentive compensation. The consolidated adjusted return on equity target is
established by the Nominating and Compensation Committee, and is set at a level
believed to provide an appropriate measure of stockholder protection. In
general, each year participants are granted dollar-denominated target base
period awards based on performance periods of two years and target consistent
performance awards based on performance periods of up to five years. Target
awards are set based on a percentage of each executive officer's Salary
Midpoint, and are adjusted as of the end of the base period based upon the
Company's consolidated adjusted return on equity. Consistent performance awards
are intended to supplement the base period awards granted to participants. No
consistent performance award is payable if the Company's adjusted consolidated
return on equity performance for the relevant period is at or below target.
Approximately sixty-five percent of all of the foregoing awards are
distributed in shares of Class A Common, the transfer of which is restricted for
ten years, with the number of shares awarded being based on the average closing
price of Class A Common on the New York Stock Exchange at the end of each week
during the last year of the appropriate performance period. An average price
mechanism, rather than year-end price or price on the date of payment, is used
in determining the number of shares to be awarded because the Nominating and
Compensation Committee believes that valuation at a single point in time in a
year is likely to lead to inappropriate results. The balance of the award is
paid in cash and is intended to be the approximate amount required to be
withheld by the Company and paid to applicable federal, state and local income
taxing authorities based upon statutorily determined withholding rates.
The Nominating and Compensation Committee believes that these incentive
compensation plan awards promote a long-term focus on the profitability of the
Company because, although a recipient may receive a payout after the end of the
base period and each consistent performance period, he is effectively required
to invest the noncash portion of the payout in the Company for up to ten years.
This is because the shares distributed may not be transferred for ten years
following the year the original target awards are established. During the
restriction period, the ultimate value of a payout is subject to change based
upon the value of the Class A Common. The value is enhanced as the value of the
Class A Common appreciates (or is decreased as the value of the Class A Common
is reduced), and thus such awards provide the recipient with an incentive over
the ten-year period to increase the value of the Company, to be reflected in the
increased value of the Class A Common.
The subsidiaries' long-term incentive compensation plans are linked to
future performance of the particular business unit. Similar to the parent
holding company's long-term incentive plan, each subsidiary plan establishes
target awards based on an executive officer's Salary Midpoint. Under the plans
at NMHG and Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, the target award is set with the grant
of "book value appreciation units." The actual amount paid ten years after the
date of original grant depends upon the increase in the book value of the
particular business unit over the time period. The North American Coal long-term
incentive compensation plan provides for awards of the right to participate in
the plan at a rate equal to a specified percentage of the individual's Salary
Midpoint. The target amount allocated to a participant is adjusted at the end of
each year
17
<PAGE> 19
for the actual net income during that plan year to determine the annual net
income appreciation of current and new mining projects against previously set
annual targets. Similarly, the target amount is adjusted at the end of each year
for the actual cumulative net income for the term of the plan to date to
determine the cumulative net income appreciation of current and new projects
against previously set targets. At the end of each plan year, the target amount
is also adjusted for the present value of expected cumulative net income
appreciation of all new projects initiated during that year to determine the net
income appreciation due to the acquisition of new projects against previously
set targets. Finally, if it is determined in any plan year that a new project
has provided significantly less net income appreciation than originally
expected, then the amount of any prior award previously attributed to that
project will reduce the new project adjustment in that year. If the new project
adjustment is large enough, it is possible for participants to receive negative
awards in a given year. Amounts credited under the North American Coal plan,
which became effective on January 1, 1990, vest at the rate of 10% for each year
following the effective date of the initial award and are fully vested on
December 31, 1999, and will be paid in cash during the first calendar quarter of
2000 (or, if so elected by the participant, deferred and paid under The North
American Coal Deferred Compensation Plan).
The long-term incentive plans at the Company and its subsidiaries generally
require long-term commitment on the part of the Company's executive officers,
and cash withdrawals or stock sales are generally not permitted for a number of
years. Rather, the awarded amount is effectively invested in the enterprise for
an extended period to strengthen the tie between stockholders' and executive
officers' long-term interests. The ultimate compensation purpose of such
long-term incentive plans is to enable executive officers to accumulate capital
through future managerial performance which contributes to the future success of
the Company's businesses.
COMPENSATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
The compensation awarded to the Company's chief executive officer reflects
the basic philosophy generally discussed above that compensation for all
employees should be based on Company and individual performance.
The Nominating and Compensation Committee considered that in 1998 the
Company continued to achieve improved levels of sales and earnings and continued
its progress towards completion of its strategic and financial objectives. The
Committee believes that this progress further enhances opportunities for
improvements in stockholder value, which have been increasingly recognized in
the marketplace over the past several years. The Committee believes that these
trends reflect the solid leadership of Mr. Rankin over the past seven and
one-half years that he has served as chief executive officer of the Company. In
particular, 1998 results reflected the impact of the Company's cost-reduction,
operating efficiencies and profit improvement programs over the past several
years as well as the Company's efforts to increase market share and improve
product positioning at its principal subsidiaries in order to further enhance
the long-term competitive advantage of the Company's businesses.
In recognition of the Company's accomplishments in 1998, the Nominating and
Compensation Committee increased Mr. Rankin's base salary approximately 7% in
1999 over his 1998 base salary. With respect to incentive compensation, Mr.
Rankin's awards for 1998 under the Company's short-term and long-term incentive
compensation plans were determined in the same manner as for all other
participants in those plans. The Nominating and Compensation Committee
established Mr. Rankin's short-term incentive compensation participation for
1998 at 75% of his Salary Midpoint. The actual performance of the Company in
1998 in terms of consolidated adjusted return on equity, and the actual
performance of certain subsidiaries in terms of net income, market share and
other strategic factors was predominantly above targeted levels of performance.
The overall performance against target, and accordingly the annual incentive
awards to all plan participants, including Mr. Rankin, was 128.5% under the
Company's Short-Term Plan and 148.0% under the Company's Supplemental Short-Term
Plan, for an aggregate annual incentive compensation plan performance against
target of 136.3%.
The Company's 1998 financial results also had a positive impact on
long-term incentive compensation payouts for 1998. The long-term award targeted
for Mr. Rankin in 1998 by the Nominating and Compensation
18
<PAGE> 20
Committee was 160.0% of his Salary Midpoint (adjusted from 145.0% to take into
consideration the fact that the award is currently taxable to Mr. Rankin).
Accordingly, awards to all plan participants, including Mr. Rankin, under the
NACCO Long-Term Plan for the two-year period from January 1, 1997 through
December 31, 1998, which was paid in early 1999, was 138.0% of targeted amounts.
The NACCO Long-Term Plan also provides for payment of "consistent performance
awards" when the Company's consolidated adjusted return on equity over
multiple-year periods exceeds a pre-established target. The consolidated
adjusted return on equity calculated pursuant to the 1995 NACCO Long-Term Plan
for the forty-five month period ending December 31, 1998 exceeded the target
established in 1995. Accordingly, plan participants, including Mr. Rankin,
received consistent performance awards equal to 25% of their respective 1995
actual long-term awards.
IAN M. ROSS, CHAIRMAN
ROBERT M. GATES
RICHARD DE J. OSBORNE
JOHN C. SAWHILL
JOHN F. TURBEN
DENNIS W. LABARRE*
ALFRED M. RANKIN, JR.*
* Messrs. LaBarre and Rankin are members of the compensation committees of the
Company's principal subsidiaries only.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Dennis W. LaBarre, a director of the Company and its principal subsidiaries
and a member of the compensation committees of the principal subsidiaries of the
Company (but not of the Company), is a partner in the law firm of Jones, Day,
Reavis & Pogue. Such firm provided legal services on behalf of the Company and
its principal subsidiaries during 1998 on a variety of matters, and it is
anticipated that such firm will provide such services in 1999.
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., a director of the Company and its principal
subsidiaries and a member of the compensation committees of the principal
subsidiaries of the Company (but not of the Company), is chairman, president and
chief executive officer of the Company.
19
<PAGE> 21
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION
The following graphs compare the Company's total annual stock price
performance on Class A Common against the total stock price performance of the
S&P 500 Composite Stock Index and, in the case of Graph 1, the S&P Diversified
Machinery Composite Index for the periods indicated. The graphs present the
year-end value of a $100 investment, at the base point, for each index assuming
the reinvestment of dividends.
In accordance with the regulations promulgated by the SEC, Graph 1 compares
the stock price performance based upon the difference between the stock price at
the beginning of each fiscal year and the stock price at the end of the fiscal
year for the five-year period commencing January 1, 1994 (base point December
31, 1993) and ending December 31, 1998.
1994-1998 Stock Price Performance
Graph 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
S&P DIVERSIFIED
NACCO S&P 500 MACHINERY
----- ------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1993 100.00 100.00 100.00
1994 95.04 101.32 97.34
1995 110.42 139.40 120.13
1996 107.97 171.41 149.73
1997 218.84 228.59 198.06
1998 189.20 293.92 164.83
</TABLE>
Assumes $100 invested at December 31, 1993 with dividends reinvested
20
<PAGE> 22
The Company believes that the measurement set forth in Graph 1, which is
based upon the stock price at a single point in time in each year, does not
adequately reflect the Company's stock price performance over the period because
of the numerous periodic fluctuations throughout the year in both the price of
the Company's stock and the level of the S&P 500 Composite Stock Index. The
Company, therefore, has provided Graph 2 which compares the returns for the
Company and the S&P 500 Composite Stock Index based upon the average of the
daily closing stock price (portrayed by the data presented in bold type)
compared with the corresponding information from Graph 1 which is based upon the
change in the stock price for each fiscal year for the same period as in Graph
1.
1994-1998 Stock Price Performance
Graph 2
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NACCO S&P 500 NACCO (AVG.OF S & P (AVG.OF
----- ------- DAILY CLOSING DAILY CLOSING
PRICE) PRICE)
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1993 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
1994 95.04 101.32 108.16 99.78
1995 110.42 139.40 112.00 120.76
1996 107.97 171.41 106.41 153.01
1997 218.84 228.59 148.60 203.23
1998 189.20 293.92 241.33 255.07
</TABLE>
Assumes $100 invested at December 31, 1993 with dividends reinvested
12-month moving average data is based upon the daily closing price
21
<PAGE> 23
The Company believes that although sustained operating and financial
performance will ultimately be reflected in stock price, the five-year period
portrayed in the foregoing graphs is too brief a period over which to measure
the results of significant strategic activities, and that corporate financial
and strategic performance will be reflected in stock price only when measured
over the long term. Accordingly, the long-term incentive compensation plans of
the Company and its subsidiaries are linked to values reflecting long-term
operating and financial achievement, not short-term stock price fluctuations, as
further described in the "Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive
Compensation -- Executive Compensation and Company Performance -- Long-Term
Incentive Compensation" on pages 17 to 18. The Company, therefore, has included
Graph 3 which compares the 10-year returns for the Company and the S&P 500
Composite Stock Index based on the average stock price for the year computed
using the same method as in Graph 2 for the 10-year period commencing January 1,
1989 (base point December 31, 1988) and ending December 31, 1998.
1989-1998 Stock Price Performance
Graph 3
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NACCO S&P 500
----- -------
<S> <C> <C>
1988 100.00 100.00
1989 140.64 117.96
1990 157.94 126.26
1991 144.54 147.21
1992 159.18 167.77
1993 165.63 187.62
1994 189.56 196.60
1995 196.24 237.94
1996 186.44 301.47
1997 260.36 400.42
1998 422.82 502.57
</TABLE>
Assumes $100 invested at December 31, 1988 with dividends reinvested
12-month moving average data is based upon the daily closing price
22
<PAGE> 24
The following table contains the annual returns expressed in percentages
for the indices set forth in the preceding graphs.
ANNUAL RETURNS OF INDICES INCLUDED ON STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR-END CLOSING PRICE
------------------------------ AVERAGE OF DAILY
S&P CLOSING PRICE
DIVERSIFIED -----------------------------------
YEAR NACCO S&P 500 MACHINERY NACCO S&P 500 NACCO S&P 500
- ---- ------ ------- ----------- ------ ------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1988 0.00% 0.00%
1989 40.64% 17.96%
1990 12.30% 7.04%
1991 -8.48% 16.59%
1992 10.13% 13.97%
1993 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.05% 11.83%
1994 -4.96% 1.32% -2.66% 8.16% -0.22% 14.45% 4.79%
1995 16.19% 37.58% 23.41% 3.55% 21.03% 3.52% 21.03%
1996 -2.22% 22.96% 24.64% -4.99% 26.71% -4.99% 26.70%
1997 102.69% 33.36% 32.28% 39.65% 32.82% 39.65% 32.82%
1998 -13.54% 28.58% -16.78% 62.40% 25.51% 62.40% 25.51%
</TABLE>
PENSION PLANS
NORTH AMERICAN COAL PENSION PLANS
The following table sets forth the estimated maximum annual benefits under
the North American Coal defined benefit pension plans (both qualified and
non-qualified) which would be payable on a straight life annuity basis, in
various compensation classifications upon retirement at age 65, after selected
periods of service:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FINAL
AVERAGE YEARS OF SERVICE AT RETIREMENT (AGE 65)
ANNUAL PAY ----------------------------------------------------
AGE 65 15 YEARS 20 YEARS 25 YEARS 30 YEARS 35 YEARS
- ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$125,000 $ 27,665 $ 36,887 $ 46,109 $ 55,331 $ 58,456
150,000 33,665 44,887 56,109 67,331 71,081
175,000 39,665 52,887 66,109 79,331 83,706
200,000 45,665 60,887 76,109 91,331 96,331
225,000 51,665 68,887 86,109 103,331 108,956
250,000 57,665 76,887 96,109 115,331 121,581
300,000 69,665 92,887 116,109 139,331 146,831
350,000 81,665 108,887 136,109 163,331 172,081
400,000 93,665 124,887 156,109 187,331 197,331
450,000 105,665 140,887 176,109 211,331 222,581
500,000 117,665 156,887 196,109 235,331 247,831
550,000 129,665 172,887 216,109 259,331 273,081
600,000 141,665 188,887 236,109 283,331 298,331
650,000 153,665 204,887 256,109 307,331 323,581
700,000 165,665 220,887 276,109 331,331 348,831
750,000 177,665 236,887 296,109 355,331 374,081
800,000 189,665 252,887 316,109 379,331 399,331
</TABLE>
For computing pension benefits under the North American Coal plans, "Final
Average Annual Pay" is based on the average annual earnings for the highest five
consecutive years during the last ten years prior to
23
<PAGE> 25
retirement. Earnings include those amounts shown in the "Salary" and "Bonus"
columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 10, which are paid to the
executive officers, other than amounts which represent severance payments,
relocation allowances and other similar fringe benefits. The 1998 earnings of
Mr. Miercort that would be taken into account under the plans is $487,201.
As of December 31, 1998, the number of years of service under the North
American Coal plans for Mr. Miercort is 23 years. The benefits under the North
American Coal plans for Mr. Miercort are not subject to a Social Security
offset.
HAMILTON BEACH/PROCTOR-SILEX PENSION PLANS
For 1996, Mr. Posey was covered by the defined benefit cash balance plans
(both qualified and non-qualified) of Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex. Hamilton
Beach/Proctor-Silex credited an amount to a notional account for each covered
employee under the plans based on a formula which took into account the
employee's age, compensation and Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex's profits.
Effective as of December 31, 1996, the defined benefit cash balance plans (both
qualified and non-qualified) of Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex were permanently
frozen for all participants.
The frozen notional account balances are credited with interest equal to 1%
above the one-year Treasury Bill rate (with a minimum of 5% and a maximum of
12%) until benefit commencement. The notional account balances are paid in the
form of a lump sum or are converted to an annuity to provide monthly benefit
payments. The estimated annual pension benefit for Mr. Posey under the cash
balance plans, based on compensation, service and interest credits through
December 31, 1998, which would be payable on a straight life annuity basis at
age 65 is $596.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's officers and
directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of
the Company's equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership of such securities with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange.
Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required
by applicable regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section
16(a) forms they file.
Based upon its review of the copies of Section 16(a) forms received by it,
and upon written representations from reporting persons concerning the necessity
of filing a Form 5-Annual Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership, the
Company believes that, during 1998, all filing requirements applicable for
reporting persons were met, except as follows:
Susan Sichel filed a report on Form 4 which identified two transactions not
reported on a timely basis; Alison A. Rankin filed a late Form 3; James T.
Rankin filed a late Form 3 and a report on Form 4 reporting two transactions by
his father not reported by James T. Rankin on a timely basis; William C. Maxwell
filed a report on Form 4 which identified one transaction not reported on a
timely basis; Chloe O. Rankin filed a report on Form 4 which identified one
transaction not reported on a timely basis; and Claiborne R. Rankin filed a
report on Form 4 which identified one transaction by his spouse not reported on
a timely basis.
2. CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors of the Company recommends a vote for confirmation of
the appointment of Arthur Andersen LLP as the independent certified public
accountants of the Company and its subsidiaries to audit the books and accounts
for the Company and its subsidiaries for the current fiscal year. It is intended
that the shares represented by proxies in the enclosed form(s) will be voted for
confirmation of Arthur Andersen LLP as the independent certified public
accountants, unless contrary instructions are received. It is expected that
representatives of Arthur Andersen LLP will attend the Annual Meeting, with the
opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and will be available to
answer appropriate questions.
24
<PAGE> 26
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals of stockholders intended to be eligible for inclusion in the
Company's proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the Company's next
annual meeting must be received at the Company's executive offices on or before
November 29, 1999. Such proposals should be submitted by certified mail, return
receipt requested, addressed to the Company, 5875 Landerbrook Drive, Mayfield
Heights, Ohio 44124-4017, Attention: Secretary. The Company's Nominating and
Compensation Committee will consider stockholder suggestions for nominees for
election to the Company's Board of Directors if such suggestions are in writing,
set forth the nominee's name, address and ownership of Class A Common and Class
B Common, and are accompanied by a resume of the nominee's education and
business experience (including directorships, employments and civic activities)
and a written consent by the nominee that such nominee is desirous of being
considered as a nominee and, if nominated and elected, such nominee will serve
as a director. Such suggestions should be submitted in the manner and to the
address set forth above and must be received at the Company's executive offices
on or before December 31, 1999. Any stockholder intending to propose any matter
at the next annual meeting but not intending for the Company to include the
matter in its proxy statement and proxy related to the next annual meeting must
notify the Company by February 10, 2000 of such intention. If the Company does
not receive such notice by that date, the notice will be considered untimely.
The Company's proxy for the next annual meeting will grant authority to the
persons named therein to exercise their voting discretion with respect to any
such matter of which the Company does not receive notice by February 10, 2000.
Notices should be submitted in the manner and to the address set forth above.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The Company will bear the costs of soliciting proxies from its
stockholders. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by
the directors, officers and employees of the Company by personal interview,
telephone or telegram. Such directors, officers and employees will not be
additionally compensated for such solicitation, but may be reimbursed for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. Arrangements will also
be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for
the forwarding of solicitation material to the beneficial owners of Class A
Common and Class B Common held of record by such persons, and the Company will
reimburse such brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith.
OTHER MATTERS
The directors know of no other matters which are likely to be brought
before the meeting. The Company did not receive notice by February 15, 1999 of
any matter intended to be raised by a stockholder at the Annual Meeting.
Therefore, the enclosed proxy card grants to the persons named in the proxy card
the authority to vote in their best judgment regarding all other matters
properly raised at the Annual Meeting.
CHARLES A. BITTENBENDER
Secretary
Mayfield Heights, Ohio
March 26, 1999
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE PROXIES BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. STOCKHOLDERS WHO DO
NOT EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING ARE URGED TO FILL OUT, DATE AND MAIL THE
ENCLOSED FORM(S) OF PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF
MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. STOCKHOLDERS WHO HOLD BOTH CLASS A COMMON AND CLASS
B COMMON SHOULD FILL OUT, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN BOTH FORMS OF PROXY.
25
<PAGE> 27
PROXY
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Class A Common Stock
Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
for Annual Meeting, May 12, 1999
The undersigned hereby appoints Robert M. Gates, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. and
Ian M. Ross, and each of them, as proxies, with full power of substitution, to
vote and act for and in the name of the undersigned as fully as the undersigned
could vote and act if personally present at the annual meeting of stockholders
of NACCO Industries, Inc. to be held on May 12, 1999, and at any adjournment or
adjournments thereof, as follows and in accordance with their judgment upon
any other matter properly presented.
The election of the nominees listed below as directors are:
Owsley Brown II, Robert M. Gates, Leon J. Hendrix, Jr., Dennis W. LaBarre,
Richard de J. Osborne, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., Ian M. Ross, John C. Sawhill,
Britton T. Taplin, David F. Taplin and John F. Turben.
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
ANNUAL
MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
MAY 12, 1999
<PAGE> 28
[X] Please mark your
vote as in this
example.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed
herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of
Directors and FOR proposal 2.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposals 1 and 2.
FOR WITHHELD FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. Election of [ ] [ ] 2. Proposal to confirm [ ] [ ] [ ]
Directors. the appointment of
(see reverse) Arthur Andersen LLP
as independent
certified public
accountants.
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- ----------------------------
Please sign exactly as name appears
hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee, or guardian,
please give full title as such.
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
IMPORTANT: PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN YOUR
PROXY AND RETURN IT IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED
<PAGE> 29
PROXY
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Class B Common Stock
Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
for Annual Meeting, May 12, 1999
The undersigned hereby appoints Robert M. Gates, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. and
Ian M. Ross, and each of them, as proxies, with full power of substitution, to
vote and act for and in the name of the undersigned as fully as the undersigned
could vote and act if personally present at the annual meeting of stockholders
of NACCO Industries, Inc. to be held on May 12, 1999, and at any adjournment or
adjournments thereof, as follows and in accordance with their judgment upon
any other matter properly presented.
The election of the nominees listed below as directors are:
Owsley Brown II, Robert M. Gates, Leon J. Hendrix, Jr., Dennis W. LaBarre,
Richard de J. Osborne, Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., Ian M. Ross, John C. Sawhill,
Britton T. Taplin, David F. Taplin and John F. Turben.
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
ANNUAL
MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
MAY 12, 1999
<PAGE> 30
[X] Please mark your
vote as in this
example.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed
herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of
Directors and FOR proposal 2.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposals 1 and 2.
FOR WITHHELD FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. Election of [ ] [ ] 2. Proposal to confirm [ ] [ ] [ ]
Directors. the appointment of
(see reverse) Arthur Andersen LLP
as independent
certified public
accountants.
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- ----------------------------
Please sign exactly as name appears
hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee, or guardian,
please give full title as such.
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
IMPORTANT: PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN YOUR
PROXY AND RETURN IT IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED
