IES INDUSTRIES INC
DEFA14A, 1996-08-19
ELECTRIC & OTHER SERVICES COMBINED
Previous: IES INDUSTRIES INC, DEFA14A, 1996-08-19
Next: IES INDUSTRIES INC, DEFA14A, 1996-08-19





                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                  Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:
[ ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
     14a-6(e)(2))
[ ]  Definitive Proxy Statement
[X]  Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section
     240.14a-12



                              IES INDUSTRIES INC.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[ ] $125 per  Exchange  Act Rules  0-11(c)(1)(ii),  14a-6(i)(1),
    14a-6(i)(2) or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
    14a-6(i)(3).
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)
    and 0-11.

(1)      Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2)      Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3)      Per  unit  price  or other  underlying  value  of  transaction
         computed  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
         amount on which the filing fee is calculated  and state how it
         was determined):
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4)      Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5)      Total fee paid:
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ ]      Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[X]      Check  box if any part of the fee is  offset  as  provided  by
         Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
         the offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous
         filing  by  registration  statement  number,  or the  Form  or
         Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)      Amount Previously Paid:

         $453,367
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2)      Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

         PRELIMINARY PROXY MATERIALS of WPL HOLDINGS, INC., IES INDUSTRIES INC.
         and INTERSTATE POWER COMPANY and JOINT PROXY STATEMENT of WPL HOLDINGS,
         INC., IES INDUSTRIES INC. and  INTERSTATE POWER COMPANY AND PROSPECTUS
         of  WPL HOLDINGS, INC.  and  INTERSTATE POWER COMPANY, ALL ON FORM S-4
         FILE NO. 333-07931
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(3)      Filing Party:

         IES INDUSTRIES INC, WPL HOLDINGS, INC and INTERSTATE POWER COMPANY
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(4)      Date Filed:
         JANUARY 18, 1996 and JULY 11, 1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------




<PAGE>
          [LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM LEE LIU DATED AUGUST 19, 1996]


                               IES INDUSTRIES INC.




August 19, 1996

Dear IES Industries Shareholder:

I am pleased to inform you that the IES Board of Directors has approved  revised
terms of a merger  agreement  with  WPL  Holdings,  Inc.  and  Interstate  Power
Company.  Under the terms of the  revised  agreement,  each  share of IES common
stock  will be  converted  into 1.14  shares of the merged  company,  Interstate
Energy  Company.  Under the former  agreement,  each IES common  share was to be
converted  into 1.01 shares of  Interstate  Energy  common  stock.  The exchange
ratios for the other  companies in the merger  remain  unchanged.  Each share of
Interstate  Power common stock will be exchanged  for 1.11 shares of  Interstate
Energy  common  stock  and  each  share of WPL  Holdings  common  stock  will be
converted into one share of Interstate Energy common stock.

Based on the closing price of WPL Holdings common stock on August 16, 1996, each
share of IES common stock is valued at $36.05 per share under the new terms.  In
addition,  based on WPL Holding's current dividend rate, it is anticipated that,
under the new terms,  IES  shareholders  will  receive an  initial  annual  cash
dividend of at least $2.25 for each share of IES common stock now held.

The revised agreement  provides enhanced value to IES shareholders,  giving them
an even larger stake in a regional utility with excellent growth  potential.  By
contrast,  analysis of the proposal  recently made by  MidAmerican  Energy makes
clear that, contrary to public statements, the value of the MidAmerican proposal
is  substantially  less than  represented.  Your  Board  recently  rejected  the
MidAmerican proposal, concluding that it is inferior to the terms of the revised
Interstate  Energy  merger  agreement  and is not in the best  interests  of IES
shareholders.

In its analysis,  your Board considered several factors,  including:  the recent
trading history of MidAmerican  stock;  the fact that for most IES  shareholders
exercise of the cash option would entail adverse tax consequences; MidAmerican's
ability to sustain its dividend, given its high payout ratio and the significant
additional  indebtedness  it would incur under its proposal;  the fact that even
with the most rapid regulatory  approval process,  which we believe is unlikely,
the MidAmerican transaction could take significantly longer to complete than the
Interstate  Energy  transaction;  and the fact that the MidAmerican  transaction
contemplates significant sales of assets to finance the transaction.



<PAGE>


We question how  MidAmerican  can afford the ambitious  promises it is making to
shareholders and customers.  By its own admission,  its expected cost savings of
$500  million  over ten years are  significantly  below the $749 million in cost
savings we anticipate  over the same period under the Interstate  Energy merger.
In  addition,  if it is  successful,  MidAmerican  will have to reduce  reported
earnings  by  hundreds of  millions  of dollars in  increased  depreciation  and
goodwill  amortization.  The financial  burdens  stemming  from the  acquisition
premium and the increased depreciation and goodwill amortization will have to be
paid by  ratepaying  customers and  shareholders.  Since the  Interstate  Energy
transaction is an all stock deal, our shareholders and rate payers will not have
to bear these burdens.

We appreciate your continued  support.  You should receive  supplementary  proxy
material  describing the terms of the revised Interstate Energy merger agreement
shortly.  The revised merger  agreement will be voted upon at our Annual Meeting
on  September  5, 1996.  If you have any  questions,  please  contact  our proxy
solicitor, Georgeson & Company Inc., toll-free, at 1-800-223-2064.

Sincerely,


Lee Liu
Chairman of the Board
President & Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission