Registration Nos. 033-06533/811-4521
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM N-1A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 /X/
Post-Effective Amendment No. 36 /X/
AND/OR
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 /X/
Amendment No. 31 /X/
T. ROWE PRICE STATE TAX-FREE INCOME TRUST
-----------------------------------------
Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202
------------------------------------------------
Address of Principal Executive Offices
410-345-2000
------------
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code
Henry H. Hopkins
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202
------------------------------------------------
Name and Address of Agent for Service
Approximate Date of Proposed Public Offering February 28, 2000
-----------------
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check
appropriate box):
/ / Immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
/ / On (date), pursuant to paragraph (b)
/ / 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
/ / On (date), pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
/ / 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
/X/ On March 31, 2001 pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485
If appropriate, check the following box:
/ / This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a
previously filed post-effective amendment.
<PAGE>
PAGE 2
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS
July 1, 2000 revised to March 31, 2001
MarylandTax-Free Funds
A money market fund and short- and long-term bond funds seeking income that is
exempt from federal and Maryland state and local income taxes.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has not approved or disapproved these
securities or passed upon the adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation
to the contrary is a criminal offense.
TROWEPRICERAMLOGO
<PAGE>
T. Rowe Price State Tax-Free Income Trust
Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund
Prospectus
July 1, 2000 revised to March 31, 2001
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1 ABOUT THE FUNDS
Objective, Strategy, Risks, and Expenses 1
-----------------------------------------------
Other Information About the Funds 6
-----------------------------------------------
Some Characteristics of Municipal 8
Securities
-----------------------------------------------
Some Basics of Fixed Income Investing 10
-----------------------------------------------
2 ABOUT YOUR ACCOUNT
Pricing Shares and Receiving 13
Sale Proceeds
-----------------------------------------------
Useful Information on Distributions 14
and Taxes
-----------------------------------------------
Transaction Procedures and 17
Special Requirements
-----------------------------------------------
3 MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS
Organization and Management 20
-----------------------------------------------
Understanding Performance Information 22
-----------------------------------------------
Investment Policies and Practices 23
-----------------------------------------------
Financial Highlights 32
-----------------------------------------------
4 INVESTING WITH T. ROWE PRICE
Account Requirements 35
and Transaction Information
-----------------------------------------------
Opening a New Account 35
-----------------------------------------------
Purchasing Additional Shares 37
-----------------------------------------------
Exchanging and Redeeming Shares 37
-----------------------------------------------
Rights Reserved by the Funds 39
-----------------------------------------------
Information About Your Services 40
-----------------------------------------------
T. Rowe Price Brokerage 42
-----------------------------------------------
Investment Information 43
-----------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Founded in 1937 by the late Thomas Rowe Price, Jr., T. Rowe Price Associates,
Inc., and its affiliates managed $XXX billion, including over $XXX billion in
municipal bond assets, for XXX million individual and institutional investor
accounts as of December 31, 2000.
Mutual fund shares are not deposits or obligations of, or guaranteed by, any
depository institution. Shares are not insured by the FDIC, Federal Reserve, or
any other government agency, and are subject to investment risks, including
possible loss of the principal amount invested.
<PAGE>
ABOUT THE FUNDS
OBJECTIVE, STRATEGY, RISKS, AND EXPENSES
----------------------------------------------------------
To help you decide whether these funds are appropriate for you, this section
reviews their major characteristics.
What is each fund's objective?
The Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund seeks to provide preservation of capital,
liquidity, and, consistent with these objectives, the highest level of income
exempt from federal and Maryland state and local income taxes.
The Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund seeks to provide the highest level
of income exempt from federal and Maryland state and local income taxes
consistent with modest fluctuation in principal value.
The Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund seeks to provide, consistent with prudent
portfolio management, the highest level of income exempt from federal and
Maryland state and local income taxes by investing primarily in
investment-grade Maryland municipal bonds.
What is each fund's principal investment strategy?
The Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund will invest at least 65% of total assets in
Maryland municipal securities. All securities held by the fund will mature in
397 days or less and the fund's weighted average maturity will not exceed 90
days. While the fund's yield will fluctuate with changes in interest rates,
its share price is managed to remain stable at $1.00. The fund buys
securities within the two highest money market categories as rated by
established agencies or, if unrated, by T. Rowe Price. All securities
purchased by the fund will present minimal credit risk in the opinion of T.
Rowe Price.
The Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund will invest at least 65% of its
total assets in investment-grade Maryland municipal bonds. The portfolio's
weighted average maturity will not exceed three years, but there is no
maturity limit on individual securities.
The Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund will invest at least 65% of its total assets
in investment-grade Maryland municipal bonds. Its weighted average maturity
is expected to exceed 15 years.
In selecting securities for the money fund, the fund manager may examine
relationships among yields of various types and maturities of money market
securities in the context of the outlook for interest rates. Similarly,
investment decisions for the bond funds reflect the manager's outlook for
interest rates and the economy as well as the prices and yields of various
securities. This approach is designed to help the manager capture
appreciation opportunities when rates
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 2
are falling and reduce the impact of falling prices when rates are rising.
For example, if we expect rates to fall, we may buy longer-term securities
within each fund's maturity range to provide higher yield (and, in the case
of the bond funds, greater appreciation potential). Conversely, shorter
maturities may be favored if rates are expected to rise. In addition, if our
economic outlook is positive, we may take advantage of the bond funds' 5%
"baskets" for noninvestment-grade bonds. From time to time, a fund may invest
a significant portion of its assets in municipal bonds of certain sectors
with special risks, such as hospital, electric utility, or private activity
bonds. The funds may sell holdings for a variety of reasons, such as to
adjust the portfolio's average maturity or quality or to shift assets into
higher-yielding securities.
Each bond fund will generally purchase investment-grade securities, which
means their ratings are within the four highest credit categories (AAA, AA,
A, BBB) as determined by a national rating organization or, if unrated, by T.
Rowe Price. The bond funds may occasionally purchase below-investment-grade
securities (including those with the lowest or no rating) but no such
purchase will be made if it would cause either fund's noninvestment-grade
bonds to exceed 5% of its net assets.
Each fund sometimes invests in obligations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
and its public corporations (as well as the U.S. territories of Guam and the
Virgin Islands) that are exempt from federal and Maryland state and local
income taxes. The funds will generally purchase these securities when they
offer a comparably attractive combination of risk and return.
Due to seasonal variations or shortages in the supply of suitable Maryland
securities, each fund may invest in municipals whose interest is exempt from
federal but not Maryland income taxes. Every effort will be made to minimize
such investments, but they could compose up to 10% of each fund's annual
income.
While most assets will be invested in municipal securities, other securities
may also be purchased, including derivatives such as futures and municipal
warrants, in keeping with fund objectives.
. Income from Maryland municipal securities is exempt from federal and
Maryland state and local income taxes.
What are the main risks of investing in the funds?
Any of the following could cause a decline in your fund's price or income.
. Interest rate risk This risk refers to the decline in bond prices that
accompanies a rise in the overall level of interest rates. (Bond prices and
interest rates move in opposite directions.) Generally, the longer the
maturity of a fund or security, the greater its interest rate risk. This risk
is minimal for the money fund.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 3
While a rise in rates is the principal source of interest rate risk for bond
funds, falling rates bring the possibility that a bond may be "called," or
redeemed before maturity, and that the proceeds may be reinvested in
lower-yielding securities.
. Credit risk This is the chance that any of a fund's holdings will have its
credit rating downgraded or will default (fail to make scheduled interest or
principal payments), potentially reducing the fund's income level and share
price. This risk is reduced for the money fund because of the high-rated
securities in its portfolio.
As of December 31, 2000, the state of Maryland was rated XXX by Moody's and
XXX by Standard & Poor's and Fitch.
Each fund may invest a significant portion of assets in securities that are
not general obligations of the state. These may be issued by local
governments or public authorities and are rated according to their particular
creditworthiness, which may vary significantly from the state's general
obligations.
While generally considered to be of medium quality, securities in the BBB
category may be more susceptible to adverse economic or investing conditions,
and some BBB securities have speculative characteristics. We may retain a
security whose credit quality is downgraded after purchase.
. Significant political and economic developments within a state may have
direct and indirect repercussions on virtually all municipal bonds issued in
the state.
. Nondiversified risk Because they are nondiversified, each fund can invest
more of its assets in a smaller number of issuers than diversified funds.
This could result in greater potential losses than funds investing in a
broader variety of issues.
. Geographical risk A fund investing within a single state is, by definition,
less diversified geographically than one investing across many states and
therefore has greater exposure to adverse economic and political changes
within that state.
. Political risk This is the chance that a significant restructuring of
federal income tax rates, or even serious discussion on the topic in
Congress, could cause municipal bond prices to fall. The demand for municipal
securities is strongly influenced by the value of tax-exempt income to
investors. Broadly lower income tax rates could reduce the advantage of
owning municipals.
. Other risks Bonds of certain sectors have special risks. For example, the
health care industry can be affected by federal or state legislation,
electric utilities are subject to governmental regulation, and private
activity bonds are not government backed.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 4
Fund investments in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its public
corporations (as well as the U.S. territories of Guam and the Virgin Islands)
require careful assessment of certain risk factors, including reliance on
substantial federal assistance and favorable tax programs that have recently
become subject to phaseout by Congress.
. Derivatives risk (bond funds) To the extent each fund uses these
instruments, it may be exposed to additional volatility and potential losses.
. Risks of the money fund An investment in the money market fund is not
insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although
the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share,
it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund. For example, a sharp
and unexpected rise in interest rates in an unusually short period of time or
the default of a portfolio security could cause the fund's NAV to fall below
$1.00.
. As with any mutual fund, there can be no guarantee the funds will achieve
their objectives.
. The income level of the funds will fluctuate with changing market conditions
and interest rate levels. The bond funds' share prices will also fluctuate;
when you sell your shares, you may lose money.
How can I tell which fund is most appropriate for me?
Consider your investment goals, your time horizon for achieving them, and
your tolerance for risk. The funds can be used to generate income or to
diversify a stock portfolio. The higher your tax bracket, the more likely
tax-exempt securities are appropriate. If you will need your principal in a
relatively short time, or want to minimize share price volatility, the
Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund may be a good choice. However, if you are
investing for higher tax-free income and can tolerate more share price
volatility, you should consider the longer-term bond fund. If you are
investing for tax-free income with principal stability and liquidity, you
should consider the money market fund.
These funds are inappropriate for tax-deferred accounts, such as IRAs.
. The fund or funds you select should not represent your complete investment
program or be used for short-term trading purposes.
How has each fund performed in the past?
The bar charts showing calendar year returns and the average annual total
return table indicate risk by illustrating how much returns can differ from
one year to the next and over time for the Short-Term Tax-Free Bond and
Tax-Free Bond Funds. Because the Tax-Free Money Fund commenced operations in
2001,
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 5
there is no historical performance information shown here. Performance
history will be presented after the fund has been in operation for one
calendar year. Fund past performance is no guarantee of future returns.
The funds can also experience short-term performance swings, as shown by the
best and worst calendar quarter returns during the years depicted in the
charts.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Calendar Year Total Returns
Fund "90" "91" "92" "93" "94" "95" "96" "97" "98" "99"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <S>
Money 4.87 3.72 2.46 1.92 2.35 3.29 2.85 3.04 2.77 2.48
Bond 5.84 12.12 8.93 12.49 -5.72 17.36 4.51 9.08 6.41 -3.30
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Money Fund Quarter ended Total return
Best quarter 6/30/90 1.25%
Worst quarter 3/31/93 0.43%
Bond Fund Quarter ended Total return
Best quarter 3/31/95 6.74%
Worst quarter 3/31/94 -5.80%
<TABLE>
Table 1 Average Annual Total Returns
<CAPTION>
Periods ended December 31, 2000
Shorter of 10 years
1 year 5 years or since inception Inception date
------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <S>
Short-Term Tax-Free
Bond Fund % % % 1/29/93
Lehman Brothers
Municipal Bond Index
3-Year State General
Obligation
Lipper Short
Municipal Debt Funds
Average
Tax-Free Bond Fund % 3/31/87
Lehman Brothers
Municipal Bond Index
Lipper Maryland
Municipal Debt Funds
Average
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
These figures include changes in principal value, reinvested dividends, and
capital gain distributions, if any. Lehman indices do not reflect the deduction
of any fees or expenses.
What fees or expenses will I pay?
The funds are 100% no load. There are no fees or charges to buy or sell fund
shares, reinvest dividends, or exchange into other T. Rowe Price funds. There
are no 12b-1 fees. Redemption proceeds of less than $5,000 sent by wire are
subject to a $5 fee paid to the fund.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 6
<TABLE>
Table 2 Fees and Expenses of the Funds
<CAPTION>
Annual fund operating expenses
(expenses that are deducted from fund assets)
Management Other Total annual fund Fee waiver/expense Net
Fund fee expenses operating expenses reimbursement expenses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <S>
Tax-Free Money % %
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Short-Term 0.42 0.18 0.60
Tax-Free Bond/a/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Free Bond 0.42 0.09 0.51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
/a Effective March 1, 2001, T. Rowe Price contractually obligated itself to
waive any fees and bear any expenses / /through February 28, 2003, to the
extent such fees or expenses would cause the fund's ratio of expenses to /
/average net assets to exceed 0.60%. Fees waived or expenses paid or assumed
under this agreement are / /subject to reimbursement to T. Rowe Price
whenever the fund's expense ratio is below 0.60%; however, no /
/reimbursement will be made after February 28, 2005, or if it would result in
the expense ratio exceeding / /0.60%. Any amounts reimbursed have the effect
of increasing fees otherwise paid by the fund. The fund oper//ated under
previous expense limitations for which T. Rowe Price may be reimbursed./
Example. The following table gives you a rough idea of how expense ratios
may translate into dollars and helps you to compare the cost of investing in
these funds with that of other mutual funds. Although your actual costs may
be higher or lower, the table shows how much you would pay if operating
expenses remain the same, the expense limitation currently in place is not
renewed (if applicable), you invest $10,000, earn a 5% annual return, and
hold the investment for the following periods and then redeem:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund 1 year 3 years 5 years 10 years
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <S>
Tax-Free Money $ $ - -
----------------------------------------
Short-Term Tax-Free Bond 61 192 $ $
335 750
----------------------------------------
Tax-Free Bond 52 164 285 640
------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
OTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS
----------------------------------------------------------
What are the funds' potential rewards?
The regular income dividends you receive from the funds should be exempt from
federal income taxes. They are also expected to be exempt from Maryland state
taxes for shareholders who live in Maryland.
The Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund is expected to provide a high level of
tax-free income consistent with price stability.
The Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund is expected to provide higher
income than the Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund and less share price volatility
than the Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 7
The Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund is expected to provide higher income and also
have greater share price fluctuation than the Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free
Bond Fund.
How does the portfolio manager try to reduce risk?
Consistent with each fund's objective, the portfolio manager uses various
tools to try to reduce risk and increase total return, including:
. Diversification of assets to reduce the impact of a single holding or sector
on a fund's net asset value.
. Thorough credit research by our own analysts.
. Adjustment of fund duration to try to reduce the drop in price when interest
rates rise or to benefit from the rise in price when rates fall. Duration is
a measure of a fund's sensitivity to interest rate changes.
What is the credit quality of Maryland general obligations?
The state's general obligations (bonds backed by the state's full taxing and
revenue raising resources) were rated XXX by Moody's and XXX by Standard &
Poor's and Fitch as of December 31, 2000.
. Credit ratings and the financial and economic conditions of the state and
local governments, public authorities, and others in which a fund may invest
are subject to change at any time.
What about the quality of the funds' other holdings?
In addition to the state's general obligations, each fund will invest a
significant portion of assets in bonds that are rated according to the
issuer's individual creditworthiness, such as bonds of local governments and
public authorities. While local governments in Maryland depend principally on
their own revenue sources, they could experience budget shortfalls due to
cutbacks in state aid.
Certain fund holdings do not rely on any government for money to service
their debt. Bonds issued by governmental authorities may depend wholly on
revenues generated by the project they financed or on other dedicated revenue
streams. The credit quality of these "revenue" bonds may vary from that of
the state's general obligations.
As of December 31, 2000, Puerto Rico's general obligations were rated XXX by
Moody's and XXX by Standard & Poor's.
What are derivatives and can each fund invest in them?
The term derivative is used to describe financial instruments whose value is
derived from an underlying security (e.g., a stock or bond) or a market
benchmark (e.g., an interest rate index). Many types of investments
representing a wide range of risks and potential rewards fall under the
"derivatives" umbrella - from
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 8
conventional instruments, such as callable bonds, futures, and options, to
more exotic investments, such as stripped mortgage securities and structured
notes. While the term "derivative" became widely known among the investing
public relatively recently, derivatives have in fact been employed by
investment managers for many years.
The money fund does not invest in high-risk, highly leveraged derivatives.
Each bond fund will invest in derivatives only if the expected risks and
rewards are consistent with its objective, policies, and overall risk profile
as described in this prospectus. Each bond fund limits its use of
derivatives to situations in which they may enable the fund to accomplish the
following: increase yield; hedge against a decline in principal value; invest
in eligible asset classes with greater efficiency and lower cost than is
possible through direct investment; or adjust portfolio duration.
The bond funds will not invest in any high-risk, highly leveraged derivative
instrument that is expected to cause the price volatility of the portfolio to
be meaningfully different from that of 1) a three-year investment-grade bond
for the Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund; or 2) a long-term investment-grade
bond for the Tax-Free Bond Fund.
Is there other information I can review before making a decision?
Investment Policies and Practices in Section 3 discusses various types of
portfolio securities the funds may purchase as well as types of management
practices the funds may use.
SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SECURITIES
----------------------------------------------------------
Who issues municipal securities?
State and local governments and governmental authorities sell notes and bonds
(usually called "municipals") to pay for public projects and services.
Who buys municipal securities?
Individuals are the primary investors, and a principal way they invest is
through mutual funds. Prices of municipals may be affected by major changes
in cash flows into or out of municipal funds. For example, substantial and
sustained redemptions from municipal bond funds could result in lower prices
for these securities.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 9
What is tax-free about municipals and municipal funds?
The regular income dividends you receive should be exempt from regular
federal income taxes. A portion of these dividends may also be exempt from
your state and local income tax (if any). However, fund capital gain
distributions are taxable to you. (See Useful Information on Distributions
and Taxes for details.)
. Municipal securities are also called "tax-exempts" because the interest
income they provide is usually exempt from federal income taxes.
Is interest income from municipal issues always exempt from federal taxes?
No. Since 1986 income from so-called "private activity" municipals has been
subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). For instance, some
bonds financing airports, stadiums, and student loan programs fall into this
category. These bonds carry higher yields than regular municipals.
Shareholders subject to the AMT must include income derived from private
activity bonds in their AMT calculation. Relatively few taxpayers are
required to pay the tax. Normally, each fund will not purchase a security if,
as a result, more than 20% of the fund's income would be subject to the AMT.
The portion of income subject to the AMT will be reported annually to
shareholders. (Please see Useful Information on Distributions and Taxes -Tax
Information.)
Additionally, under highly unusual circumstances, the IRS may determine that
a bond issued as tax-exempt should in fact be taxable. If a fund were to hold
such a bond, it might have to distribute taxable income or reclassify as
taxable income previously distributed as tax-free.
Why are yields on municipals usually below those on otherwise comparable
taxable securities?
Since the income provided by most municipals is exempt from federal taxation,
investors are willing to accept lower yields on a municipal bond than on an
otherwise similar (in quality and maturity) taxable bond.
How can I tell if a tax-free or taxable fund is suitable for me?
The primary factor is your expected federal income tax rate. The higher your
tax bracket, the more likely tax-exempts will be appropriate. If a municipal
fund's tax-exempt yield is higher than the after-tax yield on a taxable bond
or money fund, then your income will be higher in the municipal fund. To find
what a taxable fund would have to yield to equal the yield on a municipal
fund, divide the municipal fund's yield by one minus your tax rate. For quick
reference, the next table shows a range of taxable-equivalent yields.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 10
<TABLE>
Table 3 Taxable-Equivalent Yields
<CAPTION>
If your A tax-free yield of
federal tax 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7%
rate is: Equals a taxable yield of:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <S>
28% 2.8% 4.2% 5.6% 6.9% 8.3% 9.7%
------------------------------------------
31% 2.9 4.3 5.8 7.2 8.7 10.1
------------------------------------------
36% 3.1 4.7 6.2 7.8 9.4 10.9
------------------------------------------
39.6% 3.3 5.0 6.6 8.3 9.9 11.6
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
SOME BASICS OF FIXED INCOME INVESTING
----------------------------------------------------------
Is a fund's yield fixed or will it vary?
It will vary. The yield is calculated every day by dividing a fund's net
income per share, expressed at annual rates, by the share price. Since both
income and share price will fluctuate, a fund's yield will also vary.
(Although money fund prices are stable, income is variable.)
Is yield the same as total return?
Not for bond funds. The total return reported for a fund is the result of
reinvested distributions (income and capital gains) and the change in share
price for a given time period. Income is always a positive contributor to
total return and can enhance a rise in share price or serve as an offset to a
drop in share price. Since money funds are managed to maintain a stable share
price, their yield and total return should be the same.
What is credit quality and how does it affect yield?
Credit quality refers to a bond issuer's expected ability to make all
required interest and principal payments on time. Because highly rated
issuers represent less risk, they can borrow at lower interest rates than
less creditworthy issuers. Therefore, a fund investing in high-quality
securities should have a lower yield than an otherwise comparable fund
investing in lower-quality securities.
What is meant by a bond fund's maturity?
Every bond has a stated maturity date when the issuer must repay the bond's
entire principal value to the investor. However, many bonds are "callable,"
meaning their principal can be repaid earlier, on or after specified call
dates. Bonds are most likely to be called when interest rates are falling
because the issuer can refinance at a lower rate, just as a homeowner
refinances a mortgage. In that environment, a bond's "effective maturity" is
usually its nearest call date.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 11
A bond mutual fund has no real maturity, but it does have a weighted average
maturity and a weighted average effective maturity. This number is an average
of the stated or effective maturities of the underlying bonds, with each
bond's maturity "weighted" by the percentage of fund assets it represents.
Some funds target effective maturities rather than stated maturities when
computing the average. This provides additional flexibility in portfolio
management.
What is meant by a bond fund's duration?
Duration is a calculation that seeks to measure the price sensitivity of a
bond or a bond fund to changes in interest rates. It is expressed in years,
like maturity, but it is a better indicator of price sensitivity than
maturity because it takes into account the time value of cash flows generated
over the bond's life. Future interest and principal payments are discounted
to reflect their present value and then are multiplied by the number of years
they will be received to produce a value expressed in years - the duration.
"Effective" duration takes into account call features and sinking fund
payments that may shorten a bond's life.
Since duration can also be computed for bond funds, you can estimate the
effect of interest rates on share price by multiplying fund duration by an
expected change in interest rates. For example, the price of a bond fund with
a duration of five years would be expected to fall approximately 5% if rates
rose by one percentage point. (T. Rowe Price shareholder reports show
duration.)
How is a municipal's price affected by changes in interest rates?
When interest rates rise, a bond's price usually falls, and vice versa. In
general, the longer a bond's maturity, the greater the price increase or
decrease in response to a given change in rates, as shown in Table 4.
<TABLE>
Table 4 How Interest Rates May Affect Bond Prices
<CAPTION>
Price per $1,000 of a Municipal Bond if Interest Rates:
Bond maturity Coupon Increase Decrease
1% 2% 1% 2%
<S> <S> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <S>
1 year 2001
-----------------------------------------------------------
3 years 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------
5 years 2005
-----------------------------------------------------------
10 years 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
20 years 2020
-----------------------------------------------------------
30 years 2030
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The table reflects yields on AAA-rated municipals as of December 31, 2000. This
is an illustration and does not represent expected yields or share price
changes of any T. Rowe Price fund.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 12
What are the major differences between money market and bond funds?
. Price Bond funds have fluctuating share prices. Money market funds are
managed to maintain a stable share price.
. Maturity Short- and intermediate-term bond funds have longer average
maturities (from one to 10 years) than money market funds (90 days or less).
Longer-term bond funds have the longest average maturities (10 years or
more).
. Income Short- and intermediate-term bond funds typically offer more income
than money market funds and less income than longer-term bond funds.
Do money market securities react to changes in interest rates?
Yes. As interest rates change, the prices of money market securities
fluctuate, but changes are usually small because of their very short
maturities. Investments are typically held until maturity in a money fund to
help the fund maintain a $1.00 share price.
<PAGE>
ABOUT YOUR ACCOUNT
PRICING SHARES AND RECEIVING SALE PROCEEDS
----------------------------------------------------------
Here are some procedures you should know when investing in a T. Rowe Price
fund.
How and when shares are priced
The share price (also called "net asset value" or NAV per share) for each
fund is calculated at the close of the New York Stock Exchange, normally 4
p.m. ET, each day the New York Stock Exchange is open for business. To
calculate the NAV, the fund's assets are valued and totaled, liabilities are
subtracted, and the balance, called net assets, is divided by the number of
shares outstanding. Cur-rent market values are used to price bond fund
shares. Amortized cost is used to value money fund securities.
. The various ways you can buy, sell, and exchange shares are explained at the
end of this prospectus and on the New Account Form. These procedures may
differ for institutional accounts.
How your purchase, sale, or exchange price is determined
If we receive your request in correct form by 4 p.m. ET, your transaction
will be priced at that day's NAV. If we receive it after 4 p.m., it will be
priced at the next business day's NAV.
We cannot accept orders that request a particular day or price for your
transaction or any other special conditions.
Fund shares may be purchased through various third-party intermediaries
including banks, brokers, and investment advisers. Where authorized by a
fund, orders will be priced at the NAV next computed after receipt by the
intermediary. Consult your intermediary to determine when your orders will be
priced. The intermediary may charge a fee for its services.
Note: The time at which transactions and shares are priced and the time until
which orders are accepted may be changed in case of an emergency or if the
New York Stock Exchange closes at a time other than 4 p.m. ET.
How you can receive the proceeds from a sale
. When filling out the New Account Form, you may wish to give yourself the
widest range of options for receiving proceeds from a sale.
If your request is received by 4 p.m. ET in correct form, proceeds are
usually sent on the next business day. Proceeds can be sent to you by mail or
to your bank account by Automated Clearing House (ACH) transfer or bank wire.
ACH is an automated method of initiating payments from, and receiving
payments in, your financial institution account. The ACH system is supported
by over 20,000
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 14
banks, savings banks, and credit unions. Proceeds sent by ACH transfer should
be credited the second business day after the sale. Proceeds sent by bank
wire should be credited to your account the first business day after the
sale.
. Exception: Under certain circumstances and when deemed to be in a fund's
best interest, your proceeds may not be sent for up to seven calendar days
after we receive your redemption request.
. If for some reason we cannot accept your request to sell shares, we will
contact you.
USEFUL INFORMATION ON DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES
----------------------------------------------------------
. All net investment income and realized capital gains are distributed to
shareholders.
Dividends and Other Distributions
Dividend and capital gain distributions are reinvested in additional fund
shares in your account unless you select another option on your New Account
Form. The advantage of reinvesting distributions arises from compounding;
that is, you receive income dividends and capital gain distributions on a
rising number of shares.
Distributions not reinvested are paid by check or transmitted to your bank
account via ACH. If the Post Office cannot deliver your check, or if your
check remains uncashed for six months, the fund reserves the right to
reinvest your distribution check in your account at the NAV on the day of the
reinvestment and to reinvest all subsequent distributions in shares of the
fund. No interest will accrue on amounts represented by uncashed distribution
or redemption checks.
Income dividends
. Money funds declare income dividends daily to shareholders of record as of
12 noon ET on that day. Wire purchase orders received before 12 noon ET
receive the dividend for that day. Other purchase orders receive the dividend
on the next business day after payment has been received.
. Bond funds declare income dividends daily at 4 p.m. ET to shareholders of
record at that time provided payment has been received on the previous
business day.
. Dividends are ordinarily paid on the first business day of each month.
. Fund shares will earn dividends through the date of redemption; also, shares
redeemed on a Friday or prior to a holiday will continue to earn dividends
until the next business day. Generally, if you redeem all of your shares at
any time
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 15
during the month, you will also receive all dividends earned through the date
of redemption in the same check. When you redeem only a portion of your
shares, all dividends accrued on those shares will be reinvested, or paid in
cash, on the next dividend payment date.
Capital gains
. Since money funds are managed to maintain a constant share price, they are
not expected to make capital gain distributions.
. A capital gain or loss is the difference between the purchase and sale price
of a security.
. If a fund has net capital gains for the year (after subtracting any capital
losses), they are usually declared and paid in December to shareholders of
record on a specified date that month.
Tax Information
. You will be sent timely information for your tax filing needs.
Although the regular monthly income dividends you receive from each fund are
expected to be exempt from federal and state and local (if any) income taxes,
you need to be aware of the possible tax consequences when:
. You sell fund shares, including an exchange from one fund to another.
. A fund makes a distribution to your account.
Note: You must report your total tax-exempt income on IRS Form 1040. The IRS
uses this information to help determine the tax status of any Social Security
payments you may have received during the year. For shareholders who receive
Social Security benefits, the receipt of tax-exempt interest may increase the
portion of benefits that are subject to tax.
If a fund invests in certain "private activity" bonds, shareholders who are
subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT) must include income generated by
these bonds in their AMT computation. The portion of your fund's income that
should be included in your AMT calculation, if any, will be reported to you
in January.
Taxes on fund redemptions
When you sell shares in any fund, you may realize a gain or loss. An exchange
from one fund to another is still a sale for tax purposes. If you realize a
loss on the sale or exchange of fund shares held six months or less, your
capital loss is reduced by the tax-exempt dividends received on those shares.
In January, you will be sent Form 1099-B indicating the date and amount of
each sale you made in the fund during the prior year. This information will
also be reported to the IRS. For most new accounts or those opened by
exchange in 1984
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 16
or later, we will provide the gain or loss on the shares you sold during the
year, based on the "average cost," single category method. This information
is not reported to the IRS, and you do not have to use it. You may calculate
the cost basis using other methods acceptable to the IRS, such as "specific
identification."
To help you maintain accurate records, we send you a confirmation immediately
following each transaction you make (except for systematic purchases and
redemptions) and a year-end statement detailing all your transactions in each
fund account during the year.
Taxes on fund distributions
In January, you will be sent Form 1099-DIV indicating the tax status of any
capital gain distributions made to you. This information will also be
reported to the IRS. A fund's capital gain distributions are generally
taxable to you for the year in which they were paid. Dividends are expected
to be tax-exempt.
The tax treatment of a capital gain distribution is determined by how long
the fund held the portfolio securities, not how long you held shares in the
fund. Short-term (one year or less) capital gain distributions are taxable at
the same rate as ordinary income and long-term gains on securities held more
than 12 months are taxed at a maximum rate of 20%. If you realized a loss on
the sale or exchange of fund shares that you held six months or less, your
short-term loss must be reclassified to a long-term loss to the extent of any
long-term capital gain distribution received during the period you held the
shares.
A portion of the capital gains realized on the sale of market discount bonds
with maturities beyond one year may be treated as ordinary income and cannot
be offset by other capital losses. Therefore, to the extent each fund invests
in these securities, the likelihood of a taxable gain distribution will be
increased.
. Distributions are taxable whether reinvested in additional shares or
received in cash.
Tax effect of buying shares before a capital gain distribution
If you buy shares shortly before or on the "record date" - the date that
establishes you as the person to receive the upcoming distribution - you will
receive a portion of the money you just invested in the form of a taxable
distribution. Therefore, you may wish to find out a fund's record date before
investing. Of course, a fund's share price may, at any time, reflect
undistributed capital gains or income and unrealized appreciation, which may
result in future taxable distributions.
TRANSACTION PROCEDURES AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
----------------------------------------------------------
. Following these procedures helps assure timely and accurate transactions.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 17
Purchase Conditions
Nonpayment
If you pay with a check or ACH transfer that does not clear or if your
payment is not timely received, your purchase will be canceled. You will be
responsible for any losses or expenses incurred by each fund or transfer
agent, and the fund can redeem shares you own in this or another identically
registered T. Rowe Price account as reimbursement. Each fund and its agents
have the right to reject or cancel any purchase, exchange, or redemption due
to nonpayment.
U.S. dollars; type of check
All purchases must be paid for in U.S. dollars; checks must be drawn on U.S.
banks.
Sale (Redemption) Conditions
Holds on immediate redemptions: 10-day hold
If you sell shares that you just purchased and paid for by check or ACH
transfer, the funds will process your redemption but will generally delay
sending you the proceeds for up to 10 calendar days to allow the check or
transfer to clear. If, during the clearing period, we receive a check drawn
against your bond or money market account, it will be returned marked
"uncollected." (The 10-day hold does not apply to purchases paid for by bank
wire or automatic purchases through your paycheck.)
Telephone, Tele*Access/(R)/, and personal computer transactions
Exchange and redemption services through telephone and Tele*Access are
established automatically when you sign the New Account Form unless you check
the boxes that state you do not want these services. Personal computer
transactions must be authorized separately. T. Rowe Price funds and their
agents use reasonable procedures to verify the identity of the shareholder.
If these procedures are followed, the funds and their agents are not liable
for any losses that may occur from acting on unauthorized instructions. A
confirmation is sent promptly after a transaction. Please review it carefully
and contact T. Rowe Price immediately about any transaction you believe to be
unauthorized. All telephone conversations are recorded.
Redemptions over $250,000
Large sales can adversely affect a portfolio manager's ability to implement a
fund's investment strategy by causing the premature sale of securities that
would otherwise be held. If, in any 90-day period, you redeem (sell) more
than $250,000, or your sale amounts to more than 1% of fund net assets, the
fund has the right to pay the difference between the redemption amount and
the lesser of the two previously mentioned figures with securities from the
fund.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 18
Excessive Trading
. T. Rowe Price may bar excessive traders from purchasing shares.
Frequent trades in your account or accounts controlled by you can disrupt
management of a fund and raise its expenses. To deter such activity, the
funds have adopted an excessive trading policy. If you violate our excessive
trading policy, you may be barred indefinitely and without further notice
from further purchases of T. Rowe Price funds.
. Trades placed directly with T. Rowe Price If you trade directly with T.
Rowe Price, you can make one purchase and one sale involving the same fund
within any 120-day period. For example, if you are in fund A, you can move
assets from fund A to fund B and, within the next 120 days, sell your shares
in fund B to return to fund A or move to fund C. If you exceed this limit, or
if your trade activity involves market timing, you are in violation of our
excessive trading policy.
Two types of transactions are exempt from this policy: 1) trades solely in
money market funds (exchanges between a money fund and a nonmoney fund are
not exempt); and 2) systematic purchases and redemptions (see Information
About Your Services).
. Trades placed through intermediaries If you purchase fund shares through an
intermediary including a broker, bank, investment adviser, or other third
party, you can make one purchase and one sale involving the same fund within
any 120-day period. If you exceed this limit or if you hold fund shares for
less than 60 calendar days, you are in violation of our excessive trading
policy. Systematic purchases and redemptions are exempt from this policy.
Keeping Your Account Open
Due to the relatively high cost to a fund of maintaining small accounts, we
ask you to maintain an account balance of at least $1,000. If your balance is
below $1,000 for three months or longer, we have the right to close your
account after giving you 60 days in which to increase your balance.
Small Account Fee
Because of the disproportionately high costs of servicing accounts with low
balances, a $10 fee, paid to T. Rowe Price Services, the funds' transfer
agent, will automatically be deducted from nonretirement accounts with
balances falling below a minimum. The valuation of accounts and the deduction
are expected to take place during the last five business days of September.
The fee is deducted from accounts with balances below $2,000, except for
UGMA/UTMA accounts, for which the minimum is $500. The fee is waived for any
investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $25,000 or more.
Accounts employing automatic investing (e.g., payroll deduction, automatic
purchase from a bank account, etc.) are also exempt from the charge. The fee
does not apply to IRAs
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 19
and other retirement plan accounts and accounts maintained by intermediaries
through the National Securities Clearing Corporation Networking Platform, but
a separate custodial fee may apply to such accounts.
Signature Guarantees
. A signature guarantee is designed to protect you and the T. Rowe Price funds
from fraud by verifying your signature.
You may need to have your signature guaranteed in certain situations, such
as:
. Written requests 1) to redeem over $100,000, or 2) to wire redemption
proceeds.
. Remitting redemption proceeds to any person, address, or bank account not on
record.
. Transferring redemption proceeds to a T. Rowe Price fund account with a
different registration (name or ownership) from yours.
. Establishing certain services after the account is opened.
You can obtain a signature guarantee from most banks, savings institutions,
broker-dealers, and other guarantors acceptable to T. Rowe Price. We cannot
accept guarantees from notaries public or organizations that do not provide
reimbursement in the case of fraud.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
----------------------------------------------------------
How are the funds organized?
The T. Rowe Price State Tax-Free Income Trust (the "Trust") was organized in
1986 as a Massachusetts business trust. Each series is a "nondiversified,
open-end investment company," or mutual fund. The Short-Term Tax-Free Bond
Fund was organized in 1993, the Tax-Free Bond Fund was organized in 1987, and
the Tax-Free Money Fund was organized in 2001. Mutual funds pool money
received from shareholders and invest it to try to achieve specified
objectives.
. Shareholders benefit from T. Rowe Price's 63 years of investment management
experience.
What is meant by "shares"?
As with all mutual funds, investors purchase shares when they put money in a
fund. These shares are part of a fund's authorized capital stock, but share
certificates are not issued.
Each share and fractional share entitles the shareholder to:
. Receive a proportional interest in a fund's income and capital gain
distributions.
. Cast one vote per share on certain fund matters, including the election of
fund trustees, changes in fundamental policies, or approval of changes in the
fund's management contract.
Do T. Rowe Price funds have annual shareholder meetings?
The funds are not required to hold annual meetings and, to avoid unnecessary
costs to fund shareholders, do not do so except when certain matters, such as
a change in fundamental policies, must be decided. In addition, shareholders
representing at least 10% of all eligible votes may call a special meeting,
if they wish, for the purpose of voting on the removal of any fund director
or trustee. If a meeting is held and you cannot attend, you can vote by
proxy. Before the meeting, the fund will send you proxy materials that
explain the issues to be decided and include instructions on voting by mail
or telephone, or on the Internet.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 21
Who runs the funds?
General Oversight
The Trust is governed by a Board of Trustees that elects the Trust's officers
and meets regularly to review the funds' investments, performance, expenses,
and other business affairs. The policy of the Trust is that a majority of
Board members are independent of T. Rowe Price.
. All decisions regarding the purchase and sale of fund investments are made
by T. Rowe Price - specifically by each fund's portfolio managers.
Portfolio Management
Each fund has an Investment Advisory Committee whose chairman has day-to-day
responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with the committee in
developing and executing each fund's investment program. The Investment
Advisory Committees comprise the following members:
. Tax-Free Money Fund Joseph K. Lynagh, Chairman, ... Mr Lynagh has been
chairman of the fund's committee since its inception. He joined T. Rowe Price
in 1991, and has worked as a municipal bond trader since 1994.
. Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund Charles B. Hill, Chairman, Patricia S. Deford,
Marcy M. Lash, Joseph K. Lynagh, Hugh D. McGuirk, Mary J. Miller, Julie A.
Salsbery, and Arthur S. Varnado. Mr. Hill was appointed chairman of the
fund's committee in 1996. He joined T. Rowe Price in 1991 and has been
managing investments since 1986.
. Tax-Free Bond Fund Hugh D. McGuirk, Chairman, Patricia S. Deford, Marcy M.
Lash, Konstantine B. Mallas, Mary J. Miller, and Arthur S. Varnado. Mr.
McGuirk has been a member of the fund's advisory committee since 1995, and
has been involved in the municipal bond management process at T. Rowe Price
since 1993.
The Management Fee
This fee has two parts - an "individual fund fee," which reflects a fund's
particular characteristics, and a "group fee." The group fee, which is
designed to reflect the benefits of the shared resources of the T. Rowe Price
investment management complex, is calculated daily based on the combined net
assets of all T. Rowe Price funds (except the Spectrum Funds, and any
institutional, index, or private label mutual funds). The group fee schedule
(shown below) is graduated, declining as the asset total rises, so
shareholders benefit from the overall growth in mutual fund assets.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 22
<TABLE>
Group Fee Schedule
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
0.334%/a/ First $50 billion
0.305% Next $30 billion
0.300% Next $40 billion
0.295% Thereafter
-------------------------------------
</TABLE>
/a/ Represents a blended group fee rate containing various break points.
Each fund's portion of the group fee is determined by the ratio of its daily
net assets to the daily net assets of all the T. Rowe Price funds described
previously. Based on combined T. Rowe Price fund assets of $XXX billion at
December 31, 2000, the group fee was XXX%. The individual fund fee is XXX%.
UNDERSTANDING PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------------------
This section should help you understand the terms used to describe fund
performance. You will come across them in shareholder reports you receive
from us; in our newsletter, The Price Report; in T. Rowe Price
advertisements; and in the media.
Total Return
This tells you how much an investment has changed in value over a given time
period. It reflects any net increase or decrease in the share price and
assumes that all dividends and capital gains (if any) paid during the period
were reinvested in additional shares. Therefore, total return numbers include
the effect of compounding.
Advertisements may include cumulative or average annual total return figures,
which may be compared with various indices, other performance measures, or
other mutual funds.
Cumulative Total Return
This is the actual return of an investment for a specified period. A
cumulative return does not indicate how much the value of the investment may
have fluctuated during the period. For example, an investment could have a
10-year positive cumulative return despite experiencing some negative years
during that time.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 23
Average Annual Total Return
This is always hypothetical and should not be confused with actual
year-by-year results. It smooths out all the variations in annual performance
to tell you what constant year-by-year return would have produced the
investment's actual cumulative return. This gives you an idea of an
investment's annual contribution to your portfolio, provided you held it for
the entire period.
Yield
The current or "dividend" yield on a fund or any investment tells you the
relationship between the investment's current level of annual income and its
price on a particular day. The dividend yield reflects the actual income paid
to shareholders for a given period, annualized, and divided by the price at
the end of the period. For example, a fund providing $5 of annual income per
share and a price of $50 has a current yield of 10%. Yields can be calculated
for any time period.
For bond funds, the advertised or SEC yield is found by determining the net
income per share (as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission)
earned by a fund during a 30-day base period and dividing this amount by the
per share price on the last day of the base period. The SEC yield-also called
the standardized yield-may differ from the dividend yield.
The money fund may advertise a current yield, reflecting the latest seven-day
income annualized, or an "effective" yield, which assumes the income has been
reinvested in the fund.
INVESTMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES
----------------------------------------------------------
This section takes a detailed look at some of the types of fund securities
and the various kinds of investment practices that may be used in day-to-day
portfolio management. Fund investments are subject to further restrictions
and risks described in the Statement of Additional Information.
Shareholder approval is required to substantively change fund objectives and
certain investment restrictions noted in the following section as
"fundamental policies." The managers also follow certain "operating policies"
that can be changed without shareholder approval. However, significant
changes are discussed with shareholders in fund reports. Fund investment
restrictions and policies are adhered to at the time of investment. A later
change in circumstances does not cause a violation of the restriction and
will not require the sale of an investment if it was proper at the time it
was made.
Fund holdings of certain kinds of investments cannot exceed maximum
percentages of total assets, which are set forth in the prospectus. For
instance, fund investments in residual interest bonds are limited to 10% of
total assets.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 24
While these restrictions provide a useful level of detail about fund
investments, investors should not view them as an accurate gauge of the
potential risk of such investments. For example, in a given period, a 5%
investment in residual interest bonds could have significantly more of an
impact on a fund's share price than its weighting in the portfolio. The net
effect of a particular investment depends on its volatility and the size of
its overall return in relation to the performance of all other fund
investments.
Changes in fund holdings, fund performance, and the contribution of various
investments are discussed in the shareholder reports sent to you.
. Fund managers have considerable leeway in choosing investment strategies and
selecting securities they believe will help achieve fund objectives.
Types of Portfolio Securities
In seeking to meet its investment objective, each fund may invest in any type
of municipal security or instrument (including certain potentially high-risk
derivatives described in this section) whose investment characteristics are
consistent with its investment program. The following pages describe the
principal types of fund securities and investment management practices.
Fundamental policy Each fund is registered as a nondiversified mutual fund.
This means that the funds may invest a greater portion of their assets in a
single issuer than diversified funds, which may subject the funds to greater
risk of price declines. However, because each fund intends to qualify as a
"regulated investment company" under the Internal Revenue Code, it must
invest so that, at the end of each quarter, with respect to 50% of its total
assets, no more than 5% of its assets is invested in the securities of a
single issuer, and with respect to the remaining 50%, no more than 25% of its
assets is invested in a single issuer.
Operating policy (money fund) Except as permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, with respect to 75% of the fund's total
assets, the money fund will not purchase a security if, as a result, more
than 5% of its total assets would be invested in securities of a single
issuer. Under Rule 2a-7, the 5% limit, among other things, does not apply to
purchases of U.S. government securities or securities subject to certain
types of guarantees.
Municipal Securities
Fund assets are invested primarily in various tax-free municipal debt
securities. The issuers have a contractual obligation to pay interest at a
stated rate on specific dates and to repay principal (the bond's face value)
on a specified date or dates. An issuer may have the right to redeem or
"call" a bond before maturity, and the funds may have to reinvest the
proceeds at lower rates.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 25
There are two broad categories of municipal bonds. General obligation bonds
are backed by the issuer's "full faith and credit," that is, its full taxing
and revenue raising power. Revenue bonds usually rely exclusively on a
specific revenue source, such as charges for water and sewer service, to
generate money for debt service.
. In purchasing municipals, the funds rely on the opinion of the issuer's bond
counsel regarding the tax-exempt status of the investment.
Private Activity Bonds and Taxable Securities
While income from most municipals is exempt from federal income taxes, the
income from certain types of private activity bonds (a type of revenue bond)
may be subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT). However, only persons
subject to the AMT pay this tax. Private activity bonds may be issued for
purposes such as housing or airports or to benefit a private company. (Being
subject to the AMT does not mean the investor necessarily pays this tax. For
further information, please see Useful Information on Distributions and
Taxes.)
Fundamental policy Under normal market conditions, each fund will not
purchase any security if, as a result, less than 80% of the fund's income
would be exempt from federal and Maryland state and local income taxes. Up to
20% of fund income could be derived from securities subject to the
alternative minimum tax.
Operating policy During periods of abnormal market conditions, for temporary
defensive purposes, there is no limit on fund investments in high-quality,
short-term securities whose income is subject to federal and Maryland state
and local income taxes.
Operating policy Industrial development bonds are a special type of private
activity bond permitted under IRS guidelines and are typically backed by a
corporate obligor to finance projects benefiting the public. Fund investments
in industrial development bonds related to the same industry (such as solid
waste, nuclear utility, or airlines) are limited to 25% of total assets.
Bonds which are refunded with escrowed U.S. government securities or subject
to certain types of guarantees are not subject to the 25% limitation.
In addition to general obligation and revenue bonds, fund investments may
include, but are not limited to, the following types of securities:
Municipal Lease Obligations
A lease is not a full faith and credit obligation of the issuer and is
usually backed only by the borrowing government's unsecured pledge to make
annual appropriations for lease payments. There have been challenges to the
legality of lease financing in numerous states and, from time to time,
certain municipalities have considered not appropriating money for lease
payments. In deciding whether to
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 26
purchase a lease obligation, the funds would assess the financial condition
of the borrower, the merits of the project, the level of public support for
the project, and the legislative history of lease financing in the state.
These securities may be less readily marketable than other municipals. Fund
purchases of unrated lease obligations may also be made.
Municipal Warrants (bond funds)
Municipal warrants are essentially call options on municipal bonds. In
exchange for a premium, they give the purchaser the right, but not the
obligation, to purchase a municipal bond in the future. The funds might
purchase a warrant to lock in forward supply in an environment where the
current issuance of bonds is sharply reduced. Like options, warrants may
expire worthless and they may have reduced liquidity.
Operating policy Fund investments in municipal warrants are limited to 2% of
total assets.
Securities With "Puts"
Some longer-term municipals give the investor the right to "put" or sell the
security at par (face value) within a specified number of days following the
investor's request - usually one to seven days. This feature enhances a
security's liquidity by dramatically shortening its effective maturity and
enables it to trade at a price equal to or very close to par. The money fund
typically purchases a significant number of these securities. If a put
feature terminates prior to being exercised, the funds may be forced to hold
the longer-term security, which could experience substantially more
volatility.
Securities With Credit Enhancements
. Letters of credit Letters of credit are issued by a third party, usually a
bank, to enhance liquidity and ensure repayment of principal and any accrued
interest if the underlying municipal security should default.
. Municipal Bond Insurance This insurance, which is usually purchased by the
bond issuer from a private, nongovernmental insurance company, provides an
unconditional and irrevocable guarantee that the insured bond's principal and
interest will be paid when due. Insurance does not guarantee the price of the
bond or the share price of any fund. The credit rating of an insured bond
reflects the credit rating of the insurer, based on its claims-paying
ability.
The obligation of a municipal bond insurance company to pay a claim extends
over the life of each insured bond. Although defaults on insured municipal
bonds have been low to date and municipal bond insurers have met their
claims, there is no assurance this will continue. A higher-than-expected
default rate could strain the insurer's loss reserves and adversely affect
its ability to pay claims to bondholders, such as the funds. The number of
municipal bond insurers is relatively small, and not all of them have the
highest rating.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 27
. Standby Purchase Agreements A Standby Bond Purchase Agreement (SBPA) is a
liquidity facility provided to pay the purchase price of bonds that cannot be
remarketed. The obligation of the liquidity provider (usually a bank) is only
to advance funds to purchase tendered bonds that cannot be remarketed and
does not cover principal or interest under any other circumstances. The
liquidity provider's obligations under the SBPA are usually subject to
numerous conditions, including the continued creditworthiness of the
underlying borrower.
Synthetic or Derivative Securities
Derivatives and synthetics in which the funds may invest include:
. Residual Interest Bonds (bond funds) (These are a type of potentially
high-risk derivative.) The income stream provided by an underlying bond is
divided to create two securities, one short term and one long term. The
interest rate on the short-term component is reset by an index or auction
process normally every seven to 35 days. After income is paid on the
short-term securities at current rates, the residual income goes to the
long-term securities. Therefore, rising short-term interest rates result in
lower income for the longer-term portion, and vice versa. The longer-term
bonds can be very volatile and may be less liquid than other municipals of
comparable maturity. Fund investments will only be made in securities deemed
tax-exempt by a nationally recognized bond counsel, but there is no guarantee
the interest will be exempt because the IRS has not issued a definitive
ruling on the matter.
Operating policy Fund investments in residual interest bonds are limited to
10% of total assets.
. Participation Interests This term covers various types of securities created
by converting fixed rate bonds into short-term, variable rate certificates.
These securities have been developed in the secondary market to meet the
demand for short-term, tax-exempt securities. The funds will invest only in
securities deemed tax-exempt by a nationally recognized bond counsel, but
there is no guarantee the interest will be exempt because the IRS has not
issued a definitive ruling on the matter. There is no limit on fund
investments in these securities.
. Embedded Interest Rate Swaps and Caps (bond funds) In a fixed rate,
long-term municipal bond with an interest rate swap attached to it, the
bondholder usually receives the bond's fixed coupon payment as well as a
variable rate payment that represents the difference between a fixed rate for
the term of the swap (which is typically shorter than the bond it is attached
to) and a variable rate short-term municipal index. The bondholder receives
excess income when short-term rates remain below the fixed interest rate swap
rate. If short-term rates rise above the fixed income swap rate, the
bondholder's income is reduced. At the end of the interest rate swap term,
the bond reverts to a single fixed coupon payment.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 28
An embedded interest rate cap allows the bondholder to receive payments
whenever short-term rates rise above a level established at the time of
purchase. They normally are used to hedge against rising short-term interest
rates.
Both instruments may be volatile and of limited liquidity, and their use may
adversely affect fund total return.
Operating policy Fund investments in embedded interest rate swaps and caps
are limited to 10% of total assets.
. Index Total Return Swaps (bond funds) This investment vehicle allows a fund
to participate in the municipal market in a generic fashion without buying or
selling individual municipal securities. As such, index swaps can be used to
"buy" the index (if we expect municipal yields to fall and prices to rise) or
to "sell" the index (if we expect municipal yields to rise and prices to
fall). The funds will make or receive a payment (at the swap termination
date) based on a comparison of the value of the index at swap termination
versus the value at swap initiation. Index swaps can be customized as to par
amount, maturity along the yield curve, and term (or length) of the swap.
Thus, an intermediate-term fund may prefer a swap pegged to the 10-year
maturity within the index while a long-term fund may prefer a 20-year
maturity. The index can be designated to be any widely followed benchmark for
municipal yields. If the funds' view of interest rates at the time of
entering into the swap is incorrect, they would likely lose money from these
investments.
Operating policy Fund investments in index total return swaps are limited to
10% of total assets.
Private Placements
Each fund may seek to enhance its yield through the purchase of private
placements. These securities are sold through private negotiations, usually
to institutions or mutual funds, and may have resale restrictions. Their
yields are usually higher than comparable public securities to compensate the
investor for their limited marketability.
Operating policy Each bond fund may invest up to 15% (10% for the money
fund) of its net assets in illiquid securities, including unmarketable
private placements.
Types of Investment Management Practices
Reserve Position (bond funds)
A portion of fund assets will be held in short-term, tax-exempt money market
securities maturing in one year or less. Fund reserve positions provide
flexibility in meeting redemptions, paying expenses, and in the timing of new
investments; can help in structuring each fund's weighted average maturity;
and serve as a short-term defense during periods of unusual market
volatility. Fund
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 29
reserve positions can consist of shares of one or more T. Rowe Price internal
money market funds as well as short-term, investment-grade securities,
including tax-exempt commercial paper, municipal notes, and short-term
maturity bonds. Some of these securities may have adjustable, variable, or
floating rates. For temporary, defensive purposes, there is no limit on fund
investments in money market reserves. The effect of taking such a position is
that the funds may not achieve their investment objectives.
When-Issued Securities (all funds) and Forwards (bond funds)
New issues of municipals are often sold on a "when-issued" basis, that is,
delivery and payment take place 15 - 45 days after the buyer has agreed to
the purchase. Some bonds, called "forwards," have longer-than-standard
settlement dates, typically six to 24 months. When buying these securities,
each fund will maintain cash or high-grade marketable securities held by its
custodian equal in value to its commitment for these securities. Each fund
does not earn interest on when-issued and forward securities until
settlement, and the value of the securities may fluctuate between purchase
and settlement. Municipal "forwards" typically carry a substantial yield
premium to compensate the buyer for their greater interest rate, credit, and
liquidity risks.
Interest Rate Futures (bond funds)
Futures (a type of potentially high-risk derivative) are often used to manage
risk because they enable the investor to buy or sell an asset in the future
at an agreed-upon price. Specifically, futures (and options on futures) may
be bought or sold in an effort to accomplish any number of objectives,
including: to hedge against a potentially unfavorable change in interest
rates and to adjust fund exposure to the municipal bond market; to protect
portfolio value; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; and to adjust
portfolio duration. The use of futures for hedging and non-hedging purposes
may not always be successful. Their prices can be highly volatile, using them
could lower fund total return, and the potential loss from their use could
exceed a fund's initial exposure to such contracts.
Operating policy Initial margin deposits on futures and premiums on options
used for non-hedging purposes will not equal more than 5% of fund net asset
value.
Borrowing Money and Transferring Assets
Fund borrowings may be made from banks and other T. Rowe Price funds for
temporary emergency purposes to facilitate redemption requests, or for other
purposes consistent with fund policies as set forth in this prospectus. Such
borrowings may be collateralized with fund assets, subject to restrictions.
Fundamental policy Borrowings may not exceed 33/1//\\/3/\\% of total fund
assets.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 30
Operating policy Fund transfers of portfolio securities as collateral will
not be made except as necessary in connection with permissible borrowings or
investments, and then such transfers may not exceed 33/1//\\/3/\\% of fund
total assets. Fund purchases of additional securities will not be made when
borrowings exceed 5% of total assets.
Portfolio Turnover (bond funds)
Each fund generally purchases securities with the intention of holding them
for investment; however, when market conditions or other circumstances
warrant, securities may be purchased and sold without regard to the length of
time held. Due to the nature of each fund's investment program, its portfolio
turnover rate may exceed 100%. Although the funds do not expect to generate
any taxable income, a high turnover rate may increase transaction costs and
may affect taxes paid by shareholders to the extent capital gains are
distributed. The bond funds' portfolio turnover rates are listed in the table
in the Financial Highlights section.
Sector Concentration
It is possible that each fund could have a considerable amount of assets (25%
or more) in municipal securities that would tend to respond similarly to
particular economic or political developments. An example would be securities
of issuers whose revenues are paid from similar types of projects, such as
transportation bonds.
Credit-Quality Considerations
The credit quality of most bond issues is evaluated by rating agencies such
as Moody's and Standard & Poor's on the basis of the issuer's ability to meet
all required interest and principal payments. The highest ratings are
assigned to issuers perceived to be the best credit risks. T. Rowe Price
research analysts also evaluate all fund holdings, including those rated by
outside agencies. Other things being equal, lower-rated bonds have higher
yields due to greater risk. High-yield bonds, also called "junk" bonds, are
those rated below BBB.
Table 5 shows the rating scale used by the major rating agencies, and Table 6
provides an explanation of quality ratings. T. Rowe Price considers publicly
available ratings but emphasizes its own credit analysis when selecting
investments.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 31
<TABLE>
Table 5 Ratings of Municipal Debt Securities
<CAPTION>
<C> <S> <S> <S> <S> <S> <S> <S> <S> <S>
Moody's Standard &
Investors Poor's Fitch
Service, Inc. Corporation IBCA, Inc. Definition
Long Term Aaa AAA AAA Highest quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aa AA AA High quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A A A Upper medium grade
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baa BBB BBB Medium grade
Moody's S&P Fitch IBCA
Short Term MIG1/ VMIG1 Best quality SP1+ Very strong quality F-1+ Exceptionally strong
SP1 Strong grade quality
F-1 Very strong quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MIG2/ VMIG2 High quality SP2 Satisfactory grade F-2 Good quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial P-1 Superior A-1+ Extremely strong F-1+ Exceptionally strong
Paper quality quality quality
A-1 Strong quality F-1 Very strong quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-2 Strong quality A-2 Satisfactory quality F-2 Good quality
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Table 6 Explanation of Quality Ratings
<CAPTION>
<C> <S> <S> <S>
Bond
Rating Explanation
Moody's Investors Aaa Highest quality, smallest degree of
Service, Inc. investment risk.
-----------------------------------------------------
Aa High quality; together with Aaa bonds,
they compose the high-grade bond group.
-----------------------------------------------------
A Upper-medium-grade obligations; many
favorable investment attributes.
-----------------------------------------------------
Baa Medium-grade obligations; neither highly
protected nor poorly secured. Interest and
principal appear adequate for the present,
but certain protective elements may be
lacking or may be unreliable over any
great length of time.
-----------------------------------------------------
Ba More uncertain with speculative elements.
Protection of interest and principal
payments not well safeguarded in good and
bad times.
-----------------------------------------------------
B Lack characteristics of desirable
investment; potentially low assurance of
timely interest and principal payments or
maintenance of other contract terms over
time.
-----------------------------------------------------
Caa Poor standing, may be in default; elements
of danger with respect to principal or
interest payments.
-----------------------------------------------------
Ca Speculative in high degree; could be in
default or have other marked
shortcomings.
-----------------------------------------------------
C Lowest rated. Extremely poor prospects of
ever attaining investment standing.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 32
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Standard & Poor's AAA Highest rating; extremely strong
Corporation capacity to pay principal and interest.
-----------------------------------------------------
AA High quality; very strong capacity to
pay principal and interest.
-----------------------------------------------------
A Strong capacity to pay principal and
interest; somewhat more susceptible to
the adverse effects of changing
circumstances and economic conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------
BBB Adequate capacity to pay principal and
interest; normally exhibit adequate
protection parameters, but adverse
economic conditions or changing
circumstances more likely to lead to
weakened capacity to pay principal and
interest than for higher-rated bonds.
-----------------------------------------------------
BB, B, Predominantly speculative with respect
CCC, CC to the issuer's capacity to meet
required interest and principal
payments. BB - lowest degree of
speculation;
CC - the highest degree of speculation.
Quality and protective characteristics
outweighed by large uncertainties or
major risk exposure to adverse
conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------
D In default.
-----------------------------------------------------
Fitch IBCA, Inc. AAA Highest quality; obligor has
exceptionally strong ability to pay
interest and repay principal, which is
unlikely to be affected by reasonably
foreseeable events.
-----------------------------------------------------
AA Very high quality; obligor's ability to
pay interest and repay principal is very
strong. Because bonds rated in the AAA
and AA categories are not significantly
vulnerable to foreseeable future
developments, short-term debt of these
issuers is generally rated F-1+.
-----------------------------------------------------
A High quality; obligor's ability to pay
interest and repay principal is
considered to be strong, but may be more
vulnerable to adverse changes in
economic conditions and circumstances
than higher-rated bonds.
-----------------------------------------------------
BBB Satisfactory credit quality; obligor's
ability to pay interest and repay
principal is considered adequate.
Unfavorable changes in economic
conditions and circumstances are more
likely to adversely affect these bonds
and impair timely payment. The
likelihood that the ratings of these
bonds will fall below investment grade
is higher than for higher-rated bonds.
-----------------------------------------------------
BB, Not investment grade; predominantly
CCC, speculative with respect to the issuer's
CC, C capacity to pay interest and repay
principal in accordance with the terms
of the obligation for bond issues not in
default. BB is the least speculative. C
is the most speculative.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Table 6 Explanation of Quality Ratings
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
----------------------------------------------------------
Table 7, which provides information about each fund's financial history
(other than the Tax-Free Money Fund's), is based on a single share
outstanding throughout each fiscal year. Each fund's section of the table is
part of the fund's financial statements, which are included in its annual
report and are incorporated by reference into the Statement of Additional
Information (available upon request). The total returns in the tables
represent the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an
investment in each fund (assuming reinvestment of all dividends and
distributions and no payment of account or (if applicable) redemption fees).
The financial statements in the annual report were audited by the funds'
independent accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Information about the
Tax-Free Money Fund will be presented after the fund has completed its fiscal
year.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 33
<TABLE>
Table 7 Financial Highlights
<CAPTION>
Year ended February 28
Short-Term Tax-Free Bond 1996/a/ 1997 1998 1999 2000/a/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net asset value,
beginning of period $ 5.04 $ 5.15 $ 5.11 $ 5.14 $ 5.17
Income From Investment Operations
Net investment income 0.21/b/ 0.20/b/ 0.20/b/ 0.19/b/ 0.19/b/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Net gains or losses on
securities (both realized 0.11 (0.04) 0.03 0.03 (0.13)
and unrealized)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total from investment
operations 0.32 0.16 0.23 0.22 0.06
Less Distributions
Dividends (from net (0.21) (0.20) (0.20) (0.19) (0.19)
investment income)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Distributions (from capital -- -- -- -- --
gains)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total distributions (0.21) (0.20) (0.20) (0.19) (0.19)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Net asset value, $ 5.15 $ 5.11 $ 5.14 $ 5.17 $ 5.04
endof period
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total return 6.49%/b/ 3.26%/b/ 4.56%/b/ 4.46%/b/ 1.16%/b/
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period $85,784 $102,252 $109,424 $122,552 $124,135
(in thousands)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of expenses to average 0.65%/b/ 0.65%/b/ 0.65%/b/ 0.62%/b/ 0.60%/b/
net assets
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of net income to 4.14%/b/ 3.98%/b/ 3.89%/b/ 3.80%/b/ 3.70%/b/
average net assets
-----------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio turnover rate 39.3% 21.4% 60.4% 46.4% 41.4%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
/a/ Period ended February 29.
/b/
Excludes expenses in excess of a 0.65% voluntary expense limitation in effect
through June 30, 1998, and a 0.60% voluntary expense limitation in effect
from July 1, 1998 through February 28, 2001.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 34
<TABLE>
Table 7 Financial Highlights (continued)
<CAPTION>
Year ended February 28
Tax-Free Bond 1996/a/ 1997 1998 1999 2000/a/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net asset value,
beginning of period $ 9.99 $ 10.40 $ 10.35 $ 10.67 $ 10.73
Income From Investment Operations
Net investment income 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.54 0.53
----------------------------------------------------------
Net gains or losses
on securities (both
realized and 0.41 (0.05) 0.32 0.06 (0.85)
unrealized)
----------------------------------------------------------
Total from investment
operations 0.98 0.51 0.87 0.60 (0.32)
Less Distributions
Dividends (from net (0.57) (0.56) (0.55) (0.54) (0.53)
investment income)
----------------------------------------------------------
Distributions (from -- -- -- -- (0.01)
capital gains)
----------------------------------------------------------
Total distributions (0.57) (0.56) (0.55) (0.54) (0.54)
----------------------------------------------------------
Net asset value, $ 10.40 $ 10.35 $ 10.67 $ 10.73 $ 9.87
end of period
----------------------------------------------------------
Total return 10.00% 5.12% 8.68% 5.80% (2.98)%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of $798,589 $819,981 $926,416 $1,063,161 $979,371
period (in thousands)
----------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of expenses to 0.54% 0.54% 0.51% 0.51% 0.51%
average net assets
----------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of net income 5.53% 5.47% 5.31% 5.10% 5.23%
to average net assets
----------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio turnover 23.9% 26.2% 19.2% 15.4% 29.2%
rate
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
/a/ Period ended February 29.
<PAGE>
INVESTING WITH T. ROWE PRICE
ACCOUNT REQUIREMENTS AND TRANSACTION INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------------------
Tax Identification Number
We must have your correct Social Security or tax identification number on a
signed New Account Form or W-9 Form. Otherwise, federal law requires the funds
to withhold a percentage (currently 31%) of your dividends, capital gain
distributions, and redemptions, and may subject you to an IRS fine. If this
information is not received within 60 days after your account is established,
your account may be redeemed, priced at the NAV on the date of redemption.
Always verify your transactions by carefully reviewing the confirmation we send
you. Please report any discrepancies to Shareholder Services promptly.
Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans and Institutional Accounts T. Rowe Price
Trust Company 1-800-492-7670
Transaction procedures in the following sections may not apply to
employer-sponsored retirement plans and institutional accounts. For procedures
regarding employer-sponsored retirement plans, please call T. Rowe Price Trust
Company or consult your plan administrator. For institutional account
procedures, please call your designated account manager or service
representative.
OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
----------------------------------------------------------
$2,500 minimum initial investment; $1,000 for retirement plans or gifts or
transfers to minors (UGMA/UTMA) accounts ($25,000 minimum initial investment for
Summit Funds only)
Account Registration
If you own other T. Rowe Price funds, be sure to register any new account just
like your existing accounts so you can exchange among them easily. (The name and
account type would have to be identical.)
By Mail
Please make your check payable to T. Rowe Price Funds (otherwise it will be
returned) and send your check, together with the New Account Form, to the
appropriate address in the next paragraph. We do not accept third-party checks
to open new accounts, except for IRA Roll-
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 36
over checks that are properly endorsed. In addition, T. Rowe Price does not
accept purchases made by credit card check.
via U.S. Postal Service
T. Rowe Price Account Services P.O. Box 17300 Baltimore, MD 21297-1300
via private carriers/overnight services
T. Rowe Price Account Services Mailcode 17300 4515 Painters Mill Road Owings
Mills, MD 21117-4903
By Wire
Call Investor Services for an account number and give the following wire
information to your bank:
Receiving Bank: PNC Bank, N.A. (Pittsburgh) Receiving Bank ABA#: 043000096
Beneficiary: T. Rowe Price [fund name] Beneficiary Account: 1004397951
Originator to Beneficiary Information (OBI): name of owner(s) and account
number
Complete a New Account Form and mail it to one of the appropriate addresses
listed previously.
Note: No services will be established and IRS penalty withholding may occur
until we receive a signed New Account Form. Also, retirement plan accounts and
IRAs cannot be opened by wire.
By Exchange
Call Shareholder Services or use Tele*Access or your personal computer (see
Automated Services under Information About Your Services). The new account will
have the same registration as the account from which you are exchanging.
Services for the new account may be carried over by telephone request if
preauthorized on the existing account. For limitations on exchanging, see
explanation of Excessive Trading under Transaction Procedures and Special
Requirements.
In Person
Drop off your New Account Form at any location listed on the back cover and
obtain a receipt.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 37
PURCHASING ADDITIONAL SHARES
----------------------------------------------------------
$100 minimum purchase ($1,000 minimum purchase for Summit Funds); $50 minimum
for retirement plans, Automatic Asset Builder, and gifts or transfers to minors
(UGMA/UTMA) accounts ($100 minimum for Summit Funds)
By ACH Transfer
Use Tele*Access or your personal computer or call Shareholder Services if you
have established electronic transfers using the ACH network.
By Wire
Call Shareholder Services or use the wire address listed in Opening a New
Account.
By Mail
1. Make your check payable to T. Rowe Price Funds (otherwise it may be
returned).
2. Mail the check to us at the following address with either a fund
reinvestment slip or a note indicating the fund you want to buy and your fund
account number.
3. Remember to provide your account number and the fund name on the memo line
of your check.
via U.S. Postal Service
T. Rowe Price Funds Account Services P.O. Box 17300 Baltimore, MD 21297-1300
/(For mail via private carriers and overnight services, see previous /
/section.)/
By Automatic Asset Builder
Fill out the Automatic Asset Builder section on the New Account or Shareholder
Services Form.
EXCHANGING AND REDEEMING SHARES
----------------------------------------------------------
Exchange Service
You can move money from one account to an existing identically registered
account or open a new identically registered account. Remember, exchanges are
purchases and sales for tax purposes. (Exchanges into a state tax-free fund are
limited to investors living in states where the fund is registered.)
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 38
Redemptions
Redemption proceeds can be mailed to your account address, sent by ACH transfer
to your bank, or wired to your bank (provided your bank information is already
on file). For charges, see Electronic Transfers - By Wire under Information
About Your Services. Please note that large redemption requests may be routed to
a service representative.
Some of the T. Rowe Price funds may impose a redemption fee of 0.5% to 2% on
shares held for less than six months, one year, or two years, as specified in
the prospectus. The fee is paid to the fund.
By Phone
Call Shareholder Services
If you find our phones busy during unusually volatile markets, please consider
placing your order by your personal computer or Tele*Access (if you have
previously authorized these services), mailgram, or express mail. For exchange
policies, please see Transaction Procedures and Special Requirements - Excessive
Trading.
By Mail
For each account involved, provide the account name, number, fund name, and
exchange or redemption amount. For exchanges, be sure to specify any fund you
are exchanging out of and the fund or funds you are exchanging into. T. Rowe
Price requires the signatures of all owners exactly as registered, and possibly
a signature guarantee (see Transaction Procedures and Special Requirements -
Signature Guarantees). Please use the appropriate address below:
For nonretirement and IRA accounts:
via U.S. Postal Service
T. Rowe Price Account Services P.O. Box 17302 Baltimore, MD 21297-1302
via private carriers/overnight services
T. Rowe Price Account Services Mailcode 17302 4515 Painters Mill Road Owings
Mills, MD 21117-4903
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 39
For employer-sponsored retirement accounts:
via U.S. Postal Service
T. Rowe Price Trust Company P.O. Box 17479 Baltimore, MD 21297-1479
via private carriers/overnight services
T. Rowe Price Trust Company Mailcode 17479 4515 Painters Mill Road Owings Mills,
MD 21117-4903
Requests for redemptions from employer-sponsored retirement accounts must be in
writing; please call T. Rowe Price Trust Company or your plan administrator for
instructions. IRA distributions may be requested in writing or by telephone;
please call Shareholder Services to obtain an IRA Distribution Form or an IRA
Shareholder Services Form to authorize the telephone redemption service.
RIGHTS RESERVED BY THE FUNDS
----------------------------------------------------------
T. Rowe Price funds and their agents reserve the following rights: (1) to waive
or lower investment minimums; (2) to accept initial purchases by telephone or
mailgram; (3) to refuse any purchase or exchange order; (4) to cancel or rescind
any purchase or exchange order (including, but not limited to, orders deemed to
result in excessive trading, market timing, fraud, or 5% ownership) upon notice
to the shareholder within five business days of the trade or if the written
confirmation has not been received by the shareholder, whichever is sooner; (5)
to freeze any account and suspend account services when notice has been received
of a dispute between the registered or beneficial account owners or there is
reason to believe a fraudulent transaction may occur; (6) to otherwise modify
the conditions of purchase and any services at any time; and (7) to act on
instructions believed to be genuine. These actions will be taken when, in the
sole discretion of management, they are deemed to be in the best interest of the
fund.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 40
In an effort to protect T. Rowe Price funds from the possible adverse effects of
a substantial redemption in a large account, as a matter of general policy, no
shareholder or group of shareholders controlled by the same person or group of
persons will knowingly be permitted to purchase in excess of 5% of the
outstanding shares of the fund, except upon approval of the fund's management.
INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR SERVICES
----------------------------------------------------------
Shareholder Services 1-800-225-5132 Investor Services 1-800-638-5660
Many services are available to you as a T. Rowe Price shareholder; some you
receive automatically, and others you must authorize or request on the New
Account Form. By signing up for services on the New Account Form rather than
later on, you avoid having to complete a separate form and obtain a signature
guarantee. This section discusses some of the services currently offered. Our
Services Guide, which we mail to all new shareholders, contains detailed
descriptions of these and other services.
Note: Corporate and other institutional accounts require an original or
certified resolution to establish services and to redeem by mail. For more
information, call Investor Services.
Retirement Plans
We offer a wide range of plans for individuals, institutions, and large and
small businesses: Traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, SEP-IRAs, Keoghs
(profit sharing, money purchase pension), 401(k)s, and 403(b)(7)s. For
information on IRAs or our no-load variable annuity, call Investor Services. For
information on all other retirement plans, please call our Trust Company at
1-800-492-7670.
Automated Services Tele*Access 1-800-638-2587 24 hours, 7 days
Tele*Access
24-hour service via a toll-free number enables you to (1) access information on
fund performance, prices, distributions, account balances, and your latest
transaction; (2) request checks, prospectuses, services forms,
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 41
duplicate statements, and tax forms; and (3) initiate purchase, redemption, and
exchange transactions in your accounts (see Electronic Transfers in this
section).
Web Address www.troweprice.com
You can sign up online to conduct account transactions through our Web site on
the Internet. If you subscribe to America Online/(R)/, you can access our Web
site via keyword "T. Rowe Price" and conduct transactions in your account.
Plan Account Line 1-800-401-3279
This 24-hour service is similar to Tele*Access but is designed specifically to
meet the needs of retirement plan investors.
Telephone and Walk-In Services
Buy, sell, or exchange shares by calling one of our service representatives or
by visiting one of our investor center locations whose addresses are listed on
the back cover.
Electronic Transfers
By ACH
With no charges to pay, you can initiate a purchase or redemption for as little
as $100 or as much as $100,000 between your bank account and fund account using
the ACH network. Enter instructions via Tele*Access or your personal computer,
or call Shareholder Services.
By Wire
Electronic transfers can be conducted via bank wire. There is currently a $5 fee
for wire redemptions under $5,000, and your bank may charge for incoming or
outgoing wire transfers regardless of size.
Checkwriting
(Not available for equity funds, or the High Yield, Emerging Markets Bond, or
U.S. Bond Index Funds) You may write an unlimited number of free checks on any
money market fund, and most bond funds, with a minimum of $500 per check. Keep
in mind, however, that a check results in a redemption; a check written on a
bond fund will create a taxable event which you and we must report to the IRS.
<PAGE>
T. ROWE PRICE 42
Automatic Investing
$50 minimum ($100 minimum for Summit Funds) You can invest automatically in
several different ways, including:
Automatic Asset Builder
You can instruct us to move $50 ($100 for Summit Funds) or more from your bank
account, or you can instruct your employer to send all or a portion of your
paycheck to the fund or funds you designate.
Automatic Exchange
You can set up systematic investments from one fund account into another, such
as from a money fund into a stock fund.
T. ROWE PRICE BROKERAGE
----------------------------------------------------------
To Open an Account 1-800-638-5660 For Existing Brokerage Customers
1-800-225-7720
Investments available through our brokerage service include stocks, options,
bonds, and others at commission savings over full-service brokers/*/. We also
provide a wide range of services, including:
Automated Telephone and Computer Services
You can enter stock and option orders, access quotes, and review account
information around the clock by phone with Tele-Trader or via the Internet with
Internet-Trader. Any trades entered through Tele-Trader save you an additional
10% on commissions. For stock trades entered through Internet-Trader, you will
pay a commission of $24.95 for up to 1,000 shares plus $.02 for each share over
1,000. Option trades entered through Internet-Trader save you 10% over our
standard commission schedule. All trades are subject to a $35 minimum commission
except stock trades placed through Internet-Trader.
Investor Information
A variety of informative reports, such as our Brokerage Insights series and S&P
Market Month newsletter, as well as access to on-line research tools can help
you better evaluate economic trends and investment opportunities.
<PAGE>
MORE ABOUT THE FUNDS 43
Dividend Reinvestment Service
If you elect to participate in this service, the cash dividends from the
eligible securities held in your account will automatically be reinvested in
additional shares of the same securities free of charge. Dividend payments must
be $10.00 or greater to qualify for reinvestment. Most securities listed on
national securities exchanges or on Nasdaq are eligible for this service.
/*Services vary by firm./
/T. Rowe Price Brokerage is a division of //T. Rowe Price// Investment /
/Services, Inc., Member NASD/SIPC./
INVESTMENT INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------------------
To help shareholders monitor their investments and make decisions that
accurately reflect their financial goals, T. Rowe Price offers a wide variety of
information in addition to account statements. Most of this information is also
available on our Web site at www.troweprice.com.
Shareholder Reports
Fund managers' reviews of their strategies and performance. If several members
of a household own the same fund, only one fund report is mailed to that
address. To receive additional copies, please call Shareholder Services or write
to us at P.O. Box 17630, Baltimore, Maryland 21297-1630.
The T. Rowe Price Report
A quarterly investment newsletter discussing markets and financial strategies
and including the Performance Update, a review of all T. Rowe Price fund
results.
Insights
Educational reports on investment strategies and financial markets.
Investment Guides
Asset Mix Worksheet, College Planning Kit, Diversifying Overseas: A T. Rowe
Price Guide to International Investing, Managing Your Retirement Distribution,
Personal Strategy Planner, Retirees Financial Guide, Retirement Planning Kit,
and Tax Considerations for Investors.
<PAGE>
To help you achieve your financial goals, T. Rowe Price offers a wide range of
stock, bond, and money market investments, as well as convenient services and
informative reports.
A fund Statement of Additional Information has been filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
Further information about fund investments, including a review of market
conditions and the manager's recent strategies and their impact on performance,
is available in the annual and semiannual shareholder reports. To obtain free
copies of any of these documents, or for shareholder inquiries, call
1-800-638-5660.
Fund information and Statements of Additional Information are also available
from the Public Reference Room of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Infor-
mation on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling
the SEC at 1-202-942-8090. Fund reports and other fund information are available
on the EDGAR Database on the SEC's Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. Copies
of this information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by
electronic request at [email protected], or by writing the Public Reference
Room, Washington D.C. 20549-0102.
Walk-in
Investor Centers
For directions, call 1-800-225-5132 or visit our Web site
Baltimore Area
Downtown
105 East Lombard Street
Owings Mills
Three Financial Center 4515 Painters Mill Road
Boston Area
386 Washington Street Wellesley
Colorado Springs
4410 ArrowsWest Drive
Los Angeles Area
Warner Center 21800 Oxnard Street Suite 270 Woodland Hills
Tampa
4200 West Cypress Street 10th Floor
Washington, D.C.
900 17th Street, N.W. Farragut Square
For Mutual Fund or T. Rowe Price Brokerage Information
Investor Services
1-800-638-5660 TDD
1-800-367-0763
For Existing Accounts
Shareholder Services
1-800-225-5132
For Performance, Prices, Account Information, or to Conduct Transactions
Tele*Access/(R)/
24 hours, 7 days 1-800-638-2587
Internet Address
www.troweprice.com
LOGO
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. 100 East Pratt Street Baltimore, MD 21202
C12-040 3/31/01
1940 Act File No. 811-4521
<PAGE>
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The date of this Statement of Additional Information is July 1, 2000, revised
to November 15, 2000, and March 31, 2001.
T. ROWE PRICE CALIFORNIA TAX-FREE INCOME TRUST (the "Trust")
California Tax-Free Bond Fund
California Tax-Free Money Fund
and
T. ROWE PRICE STATE TAX-FREE INCOME TRUST (the "Trust")
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund
Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond Fund
New York Tax-Free Bond Fund
New York Tax-Free Money Fund
Virginia Tax-Free Bond Fund
and
T. ROWE PRICE TAX-EFFICIENT FUNDS, INC.
T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund
T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Growth Fund
T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth Fund
T. ROWE PRICE TAX-EXEMPT MONEY FUND, INC.
T. Rowe Price Tax-Exempt Money Fund
T. Rowe Price Tax-Exempt Money Fund--PLUS Class
T. ROWE PRICE TAX-FREE HIGH YIELD FUND, INC.
T. ROWE PRICE TAX-FREE INCOME FUND, INC.
T. ROWE PRICE TAX-FREE INTERMEDIATE BOND FUND, INC.
T. ROWE PRICE TAX-FREE SHORT-INTERMEDIATE FUND, INC.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mailing Address: T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. 100 East Pratt
Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 1-800-638-5660
This Statement of Additional Information is not a prospectus but should be
read in conjunction with the appropriate fund prospectus dated July 1, 2000
(or November 15, 2000 for the T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth
Fund, or March 31, 2001 for the Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund), which may be
obtained from T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. ("Investment
Services").
Each fund's (other than the Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth and Maryland
Tax-Free Money Funds') financial statements for the year ended February 29,
2000, and the report of independent accountants are included in each fund's
Annual Report and incorporated by reference into this Statement of Additional
Information.
If you would like a prospectus or an annual or semiannual shareholder report
for a fund of which you are not a shareholder, please call 1-800-638-5660. A
prospectus with more complete information, including management fees and
expenses, will be sent to you. Please read it carefully.
C03-043 3/31/01
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-----------------
Page Page
---- ----
<S> <S> <C> <S> <S>
Capital Stock 69 Pricing of Securities 61
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Code of Ethics 54 Principal Holders of Securities 48
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Custodian 53 Ratings of Commercial Paper 78
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Distributor for the 53 Ratings of Municipal Debt Securities 76
Funds
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Dividends and 62 Ratings of Municipal Notes and 77
Distributions Variable Rate Securities
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Federal Registration 71 Risk Factors 3
of Shares
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Independent 71 Risk Factors Associated with a 5
Accountants California Portfolio
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Investment Management 48 Risk Factors Associated with a 8
Services Florida Portfolio
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Investment Objectives 2 Risk Factors Associated with a 10
and Policies Georgia Portfolio
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Investment Performance 67 Risk Factors Associated with a 11
Maryland Portfolio
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Investment Program 19 Risk Factors Associated with a New 12
Jersey Portfolio
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Investment 37 Risk Factors Associated with a New 14
Restrictions York Portfolio
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Legal Counsel 71 Risk Factors Associated with a 16
Virginia Portfolio
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Risk Factors Associated with
Management of the Tax-Efficient Growth and
Funds Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth Funds
40 and the Equity Portion of 19
Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Net Asset Value Per 62 Services by Outside Parties 53
Share
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Organization of the 70 Tax Status 63
Funds
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Portfolio Management 26 Yield Information 65
Practices
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Portfolio Transactions 54
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following information supplements the discussion of each fund's
investment objectives and policies discussed in each fund's prospectus.
The funds will not substantively change their investment objectives without
obtaining shareholder approval. Unless otherwise specified, the investment
programs and restrictions of the funds are not fundamental policies. Each
fund's operating policies are subject to change by each Board of
Directors/Trustees without shareholder approval. However, shareholders will
be notified of a material change in an operating policy. Each fund's
fundamental policies may not be changed without the approval of at least a
majority of the outstanding shares of the fund or, if it is less, 67% of the
shares represented at a meeting of shareholders at which the holders of 50%
or more of the shares are represented. References to the following are as
indicated:
Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act")
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. ("T. Rowe Price")
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's")
Standard & Poor's Corporation ("S&P")
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code")
T. Rowe Price International, Inc. ("T. Rowe Price
International")
2
<PAGE>
Throughout this Statement of Additional Information, "the fund" is intended
to refer to each fund listed on the cover page, unless otherwise indicated.
RISK FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference is also made to the sections entitled "Types of Securities" and
"Portfolio Management Practices" for discussions of the risks associated with
the investments and practices described therein as they apply to the fund.
All Funds (other than Tax-Efficient Growth and Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth
Funds)
The funds are designed for investors who, because of their tax bracket, can
benefit from investment in municipal bonds whose income is exempt from
federal taxes. The funds are not appropriate for qualified retirement plans
where income is already tax-deferred.
All Funds
Because of their investment policies, the funds may or may not be suitable or
appropriate for all investors. The funds (except for the Money Funds) are not
an appropriate investment for those whose primary objective is principal
stability. The value of the portfolio securities of the fund will fluctuate
based upon market conditions. The Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund will normally
have 40-50% of its assets in equity securities. The Tax-Efficient Growth and
Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth Funds will normally invest primarily in common
stocks. Assets of these funds invested in equity securities will be subject
to all of the risks of investing in the stock market. There can, of course,
be no assurance that the funds will achieve their investment objectives.
All Funds (other than Tax-Efficient Growth and Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth
Funds)
Municipal Securities
Yields on municipal securities are dependent on a variety of factors,
including the general conditions of the money market and the municipal bond
market, the size of a particular offering, the maturity of the obligations,
and the rating of the issue. Municipal securities with longer maturities tend
to produce higher yields and are generally subject to potentially greater
capital appreciation and depreciation than obligations with shorter
maturities and lower yields. The market prices of municipal securities
usually vary, depending upon available yields. An increase in interest rates
will generally reduce the value of portfolio investments, and a decline in
interest rates will generally increase the value of portfolio investments.
The ability of all the funds to achieve their investment objectives is also
dependent on the continuing ability of the issuers of municipal securities in
which the funds invest to meet their obligations for the payment of interest
and principal when due. The ratings of Moody's, S&P, and Fitch IBCA, Inc.
("Fitch") represent their opinions as to the quality of municipal securities
which they undertake to rate. Ratings are not absolute standards of quality;
consequently, municipal securities with the same maturity, coupon, and rating
may have different yields. There are variations in municipal securities, both
within a particular classification and between classifications, depending on
numerous factors. It should also be pointed out that, unlike other types of
investments, offerings of municipal securities have traditionally not been
subject to regulation by, or registration with, the SEC, although there have
been proposals which would provide for regulation in the future.
The federal bankruptcy statutes relating to the debts of political
subdivisions and authorities of states of the United States provide that, in
certain circumstances, such subdivisions or authorities may be authorized to
initiate bankruptcy proceedings without prior notice to or consent of
creditors, which proceedings could result in material and adverse changes in
the rights of holders of their obligations.
Proposals have been introduced in Congress to restrict or eliminate the
federal income tax exemption for interest on municipal securities, and
similar proposals may be introduced in the future. Proposed "Flat Tax" and
"Value Added Tax" proposals would also have the effect of eliminating the tax
preference for municipal securities. Some of the past proposals would have
applied to interest on municipal securities issued before the date of
enactment, which would have adversely affected their value to a material
degree. If such a proposal
3
<PAGE>
were enacted, the availability of municipal securities for investment by the
funds and the value of a fund's portfolio would be affected and, in such an
event, a fund would reevaluate its investment objectives and policies.
Although the banks and securities dealers with which the fund will transact
business will be banks and securities dealers that T. Rowe Price believes to
be financially sound, there can be no assurance that they will be able to
honor their obligations to the fund with respect to such transactions.
After purchase by a fund, a security may cease to be rated or its rating may
be reduced below the minimum required for purchase by the fund. Neither event
would require a sale of such security by the fund. However, T. Rowe Price
will consider such events in its determination of whether the fund should
continue to hold the security. To the extent that the ratings given by
Moody's, S&P, or Fitch may change as a result of changes in such
organizations or their rating systems, the fund will attempt to use
comparable ratings as standards for investments in accordance with the
investment policies contained in the prospectus. When purchasing unrated
securities, T. Rowe Price, under the supervision of the fund's Board of
Directors/Trustees, determines whether the unrated security is of a quality
comparable to that which the fund is allowed to purchase.
Municipal Bond Insurance All of the funds may purchase insured bonds from
time to time. Municipal bond insurance provides an unconditional and
irrevocable guarantee that the insured bond's principal and interest will be
paid when due. The guarantee is purchased from a private, non-governmental
insurance company.
There are two types of insured securities that may be purchased by the funds:
bonds carrying either (1) new issue insurance; or (2) secondary insurance.
New issue insurance is purchased by the issuer of a bond in order to improve
-------------------
the bond's credit rating. By meeting the insurer's standards and paying an
insurance premium based on the bond's principal value, the issuer is able to
obtain a higher credit rating for the bond. Once purchased, municipal bond
insurance cannot be canceled, and the protection it affords continues as long
as the bonds are outstanding and the insurer remains solvent.
The funds may also purchase bonds that carry secondary insurance purchased by
-------------------
an investor after a bond's original issuance. Such policies insure a security
for the remainder of its term. Generally, the funds expect that portfolio
bonds carrying secondary insurance will have been insured by a prior
investor. However, the funds may, on occasion, purchase secondary insurance
on their own behalf.
Each of the municipal bond insurance companies has established reserves to
cover estimated losses. Both the method of establishing these reserves and
the amount of the reserves vary from company to company. The risk that a
municipal bond insurance company may experience a claim extends over the life
of each insured bond. Municipal bond insurance companies are obligated to pay
a bond's interest and principal when due if the issuing entity defaults on
the insured bond. Although defaults on insured municipal bonds have been low
to date, there is no assurance this low rate will continue in the future. A
higher than expected default rate could deplete loss reserves and adversely
affect the ability of a municipal bond insurer to pay claims to holders of
insured bonds, such as the fund.
Money Funds
The Money Funds will limit their purchases of portfolio instruments to those
U.S. dollar-denominated securities which the fund's Board of
Directors/Trustees determines present minimal credit risk, and which are
Eligible Securities as defined in Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act. Eligible
Securities are generally securities which have been rated (or whose issuer
has been rated or whose issuer has comparable securities rated) in one of the
two highest short-term rating categories (which may include sub-categories)
by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations or, in the case of
any instrument that is not so rated, is of comparable high quality as
determined by T. Rowe Price pursuant to written guidelines established under
the supervision of the fund's Board of Directors/Trustees. In addition, the
fund may treat variable and floating rate instruments with demand features as
short-term securities pursuant to Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act.
Bond and Balanced Funds
Because of their investment policies, the Bond and Balanced Funds may not be
suitable or appropriate for all investors. The funds are designed for
investors who wish to invest in non-money market funds for income,
4
<PAGE>
and who would benefit, because of their tax bracket, from receiving income
that is exempt from federal income taxes. The Bond and Balanced Funds'
investment programs permit the purchase of investment-grade securities that
do not meet the high-quality standards of the Money Funds. Since investors
generally perceive that there are greater risks associated with investment in
lower-quality securities, the yield from such securities normally exceeds
those obtainable from higher-quality securities. In addition, the principal
value of long-term lower-rated securities generally will fluctuate more
widely than higher-quality securities. Lower-quality investments entail a
higher risk of default--that is, the nonpayment of interest and principal by
the issuer than higher-quality investments. The value of the portfolio
securities of the Bond and Balanced Funds will fluctuate based upon market
conditions. Although these funds seek to reduce credit risk by investing in a
diversified portfolio, such diversification does not eliminate all risk.
These funds are also not intended to provide a vehicle for short-term trading
purposes.
Special Risks of High-Yield Investing The fund may invest in low-quality
bonds commonly referred to as "junk bonds." Junk bonds are regarded as
predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer's continuing ability to
meet principal and interest payments. Because investment in low- and
lower-medium-quality bonds involves greater investment risk, to the extent
the fund invests in such bonds, achievement of its investment objective will
be more dependent on T. Rowe Price's credit analysis than would be the case
if the fund were investing in higher-quality bonds. High-yield bonds may be
more susceptible to real or perceived adverse economic conditions than
investment-grade bonds. A projection of an economic downturn, or higher
interest rates, for example, could cause a decline in high-yield bond prices
because the advent of such events could lessen the ability of highly
leveraged issuers to make principal and interest payments on their debt
securities. In addition, the secondary trading market for high-yield bonds
may be less liquid than the market for higher-grade bonds, which can
adversely affect the ability of a fund to dispose of its portfolio
securities. Bonds for which there is only a "thin" market can be more
difficult to value inasmuch as objective pricing data may be less available
and judgment may play a greater role in the valuation process.
RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A CALIFORNIA PORTFOLIO
The funds' concentration in debt obligations of one state carries a higher
risk than a portfolio that is geographically diversified. In addition to
state general obligations and notes, the funds will invest in local bond
issues, lease obligations and revenue bonds, the credit quality and risk of
which will vary according to each security's own structure and underlying
economics.
Debt The state, its agencies and local governmental entities issued $27.0
billion in long-term debt in 1999. Approximately 25% was general obligation
debt, backed by the taxing power of the issuer, while 75% were revenue bonds
and lease-backed obligations, issued for a wide variety of purposes,
including transportation, housing, education and health care.
As of February 1, 2000, the State of California had approximately $20.4
billion in outstanding general obligation bonds secured by the state's
revenue and taxing power. An additional $11.7 billion in authorized but
unissued state general obligation debt remains to be issued to comply with
voter initiatives and legislative mandates. Debt service on roughly 20% of
the state's outstanding debt is met from revenue producing projects such as
water, harbor, and housing facilities. As part of its cash management
program, the state regularly issues short-term notes to meet its disbursement
requirements in advance of revenue collections. During fiscal 2000, the state
issued $1.0 billion in short-term notes for this purpose. California also
operates a commercial paper program which it uses to finance construction
projects. $1.0 billion of commercial paper was outstanding as of February 1,
2000. The state supports $5.7 billion in lease-purchase obligations
attributable to the State Public Works Board and other issuers. These
obligations are not backed by the full faith and credit of the state but
instead, are subject to annual appropriations from the State's General Fund.
In addition to the state obligations described above, bonds have been issued
by special public authorities in California that are not obligations of the
state. These include bonds issued by the California Housing Finance Agency,
the Department of Water Resources, the Department of Veterans Affairs,
California State University and the California Transportation Commission.
5
<PAGE>
Economy California's economy is the largest among the 50 states and one of
the largest in the world. Its 1999 population of 34 million represents 12% of
the U.S. total. The state's per capita personal income in 1999 exceeded the
U.S. average by 3%. The State of California has benefitted from its focus on
the high technology sector.
California's economy suffered through a severe recession during the early
1990s as the effects of a slowdown in the national economy were compounded by
federal defense spending cuts and military base closings. Since 1994, the
state has been in a steady recovery, exhibiting significant job growth and
gains in personal income. Growth was expected to moderate in 1999 and 2000,
but is, in fact, continuing at strong levels. The level of economic activity
within the state is important as it influences the growth or contraction of
state and local government revenues available for operations and debt
service.
Recessionary influences and the effects of overbuilding in selected areas
resulted in a contraction in real estate values in many regions of the state
in prior years. All urban areas have shown improvement corresponding to gains
in the general economic level. Future declines in property values could have
a negative effect on the ability of certain local governments to meet their
obligations.
As a state, California is more prone to earthquakes than most other states in
the country, creating potential economic losses from damages. On January 17,
1994, a major earthquake, measuring 6.8 on the Richter scale, hit Southern
California centered in the area of Northridge. Total damage has been
estimated at $20 billion. Significant federal aid has been received.
Legislative Due to the funds' concentration in the State of California and
its municipal issuers, the funds may be affected by certain amendments to the
California constitution and state statutes which limit the taxing and
spending authority of California governmental entities and may affect their
ability to meet their debt service obligations.
In 1978, California voters approved "Proposition 13" adding Article XIIIA, to
the state constitution which limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1%
of "full cash value" and restricts the ability of taxing entities to increase
real property taxes. In subsequent actions, the state substantially increased
its expenditures to provide assistance to its local governments to offset the
losses in revenues and to maintain essential local services; later the state
phased out most local aid in response to its own fiscal pressures.
Another constitutional amendment, Article XIIIB, was passed by voters in 1979
prohibiting the state from spending revenues beyond its annually adjusted
"appropriations limit." Any revenues exceeding this limit must be returned to
the taxpayers as a revision in the tax rate or fee schedule over the
following two years. Such a refund, in the amount of $1.1 billion, occurred
in fiscal year 1987 and it is possible another refund will occur in the near
term based on the strong growth in personal income tax revenues.
Proposition 218, the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," was approved by the voters
in 1996. It further restricts the ability of local governments to levy and
collect both existing and future taxes, assessments and fees. In addition to
further limiting the financial flexibility of local governments in the state,
it also increases the possibility of voter determined tax rollbacks and
repeals. The interpretation and application of this proposition will
ultimately be determined by the courts.
An effect of the tax and spending limitations in California has been a broad
scale shift by local governments away from general obligation debt that
requires voter approval and pledging future tax revenues, towards lease
revenue financing that is subject to abatement and does not require voter
approval. Lease-backed debt is generally viewed as a less secure form of
borrowing and therefore entails greater credit risk. Local governments also
raise capital through the use of Mello-Roos, 1915 Act, and Tax Increment
Bonds, all of which are generally riskier than general obligation debt as
they often rely on tax revenues to be generated by future development for
their support.
Proposition 98, enacted in 1988, changed the state's method of funding
education for grades below the university level. Under this constitutional
amendment, the schools are guaranteed a minimum share of state General Fund
revenues. The major effect of Proposition 98 has been to restrict the state's
flexibility to respond to fiscal stress.
6
<PAGE>
Future initiatives, if proposed and adopted, or future court decisions could
create renewed pressure on California governments and their ability to raise
revenues. The state and its underlying localities have displayed flexibility,
however, in overcoming the negative effects of past initiatives.
Financial The recession of the early 1990s placed California's finances under
pressure. From 1991 through 1995, accumulated deficits were carried over into
the following years and the state's general obligation bonds were downgraded
from AAA to A.
Reflecting the recent trend of economic recovery, the state's financial
condition has improved considerably. Fiscal 1999 closed with a reserve
balance of $3.9 billion. Much of this cushion is the result of explosive
growth in capital gains tax collections and sales tax receipts. The Governor
has proposed a budget for fiscal 2000 which features continued growth in
capital gains tax collections, offset by a cut in the vehicle license fee.
The state's reserve is projected to be $3.0 billion at the end of fiscal 2000
(1.2% of revenues.) Revenues have been coming in above forecast. In October
1998, Moody's upgraded the state's general obligation bonds to Aa3 from A1;
in August 1999, S&P upgraded the state's general obligations to AA- from A+;
in February 2000, Fitch upgraded the state's general obligation bonds to AA
from AA-. The consequences of the state's fiscal actions reach beyond its own
general obligation bond ratings. Many state agencies and local governments
which depend upon state appropriations realized significant cutbacks in
funding during the last recession. Entities which have been forced to make
program reductions or to increase fees or raise special taxes to cover their
debt service and lease obligations may recover somewhat during periods of
economic prosperity.
On December 6, 1994, Orange County filed for protection under Chapter 9 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code after reports of significant losses in its
investment pool. Upon restructuring, the realized losses in the pool were
$1.6 billion or 21% of assets. More than 200 public entities, most of which,
but not all, are located in Orange County were also depositors in the pool.
The County defaulted on a number of its debt obligations. The County emerged
from bankruptcy on June 12, 1996. Through a series of long-term financings,
it repaid most of its obligations to pool depositors and has become current
on its public debt obligations. The balance of claims against the County are
payable from any proceeds received from litigation against securities dealers
and other parties. The County's ratings were restored to investment grade in
1998 and were upgraded again in 1999.
Sectors Certain areas of potential investment concentration present unique
risks. In 1999, $2.4 billion of tax- exempt debt issued in California was for
public or nonprofit hospitals. A significant portion of the funds' assets may
be invested in health care issues. For over a decade, the hospital industry
has been under significant pressure to reduce expenses and shorten length of
stay, a phenomenon which has negatively affected the financial health of many
hospitals. All hospitals are dependent on third-party reimbursement sources
such as the federal Medicare and state MediCal programs or private insurers.
To the extent these third-party payers reduce reimbursement levels, the
individual hospitals may be affected. In the face of these pressures, the
trend of hospital mergers and acquisitions has accelerated in recent years.
These organizational changes present both risks and opportunities for the
institutions involved.
The funds may from time to time invest in electric revenue issues. The
financial performance of these utilities may be impacted as the industry
moves toward deregulation and increased competition. California's electric
utility restructuring plan, Assembly Bill 1890, permits direct competition to
be phased in between 1998 and 2002. Municipal utilities, while not subject to
the legislation, are being faced with competitive market forces and must use
the transition period wisely to proactively prepare for deregulation. They
are under pressure to reduce rates and cut costs in order to maintain their
customer bases. In addition, some electric revenue issues have exposure to or
participate in nuclear power plants which could affect the issuer's financial
performance. Risks include unexpected outages or plant shutdowns, increased
Nuclear Regulatory Commission surveillance or inadequate rate relief.
The funds may invest in private activity bond issues for corporate and
nonprofit borrowers. These issues sold through various governmental conduits,
are backed solely by the revenues pledged by the respective borrower
corporations. No governmental support is implied.
7
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A FLORIDA PORTFOLIO
The fund's program of investing primarily in AAA-rated Florida municipal
bonds should significantly lessen the credit risks which would be associated
with a portfolio of lower quality Florida bonds. Nevertheless, the fund's
concentration in securities issued by the State of Florida and its political
subdivisions involves greater risk than a fund broadly invested in bonds
across many states and municipalities. The credit quality of the fund will
depend upon the continued financial strength of the State of Florida and the
numerous public bodies, municipalities and other issuers of debt securities
in Florida.
Debt The State of Florida and its local governments issue three basic types
of debt, with varying degrees of credit risk: general obligation bonds backed
by the unlimited taxing power of the issuer, revenue bonds secured by
specific pledged funds or charges for a related project, and tax-exempt lease
obligations, supported by annual appropriations from the issuer, usually with
no implied tax or specific revenue pledge. During 1999, $11.6 billion in
state and local debt was issued in Florida, a 24% decrease from the previous
year. Debt issued in 1999 was for a wide variety of public purposes,
including transportation, housing, education, health care and utilities.
As of June 30,1999, the State of Florida had $9.2 billion outstanding general
obligation bonds secured by the state's full faith and credit and taxing
power. General bonded debt service accounted for a modest 2.4% of all
governmental expenditures in fiscal year 1990. Approximately an additional $4
billion in outstanding bonds have been issued by the state and secured by
limited state tax and revenue sources. General obligation debt of the State
of Florida is rated Aa2 by Moody's, AA+ by S&P, and AA by Fitch as of May 8,
2000. State debt may only be used to fund capital outlay projects; Florida is
not authorized to issue obligations to fund operations.
Several agencies of the state are also authorized to issue debt which does
not represent a pledge of the state's credit. The Florida Housing Finance
Authority and Florida Board of Regents are the largest issuers of this type.
The principal and interest on bonds issued by these bodies are payable solely
from specified sources such as mortgage repayments and university tuition and
fees.
Economy The State of Florida has a population of approximately 15.3 million,
making it the fourth largest state. Due to immigration, the state's
population has grown at a rate exceeding the nation for four decades.
Florida's economy is broadly based with a large concentration in the service
and trade sectors. Tourism is one of Florida's most important industries. In
1999, visitor arrivals once again surpassed all previous years and this trend
is expected to continue. Forecasts show a 5% increase is anticipated for 2000
and total arrivals will grow to 51.2 million.
During most of the 1980s, as Florida's population and employment base grew,
its job growth rate was double that of the nation. However, beginning in
1988, job growth slowed and unemployment rates began trending above national
levels for a number of years. During 1991, Florida's unemployment rate was
8.2% versus 7.4% nationally. Florida's rapid non-farm job growth since 1996
has reversed this trend and the state's February 2000 unemployment rate now
stands at 3.7% versus the rate of 4% one year ago. State per capita income is
98% of the national average and 108% of the level for the Southeast.
Legislative The State of Florida does not have a personal income tax. A
constitutional amendment would be required in order to implement such a tax.
Although the probability appears very low, the fund cannot rule out the
possibility that a personal income tax may be implemented at some time in the
future. If such a tax were to be imposed, there is no assurance that interest
earned on Florida Municipal Obligations would be exempt from this tax.
Under current Florida law, shares of the fund will be exempt from the state's
intangible personal property tax to the extent that on the annual assessment
date (January 1) its assets are solely invested in Florida Municipal
Obligations and U.S. government securities, certain short-term cash
investments, or other exempt securities. In recent years, the Florida
legislature began efforts to gradually reduce the intangibles tax. In the
1998 and 1999 legislative sessions the rate has been reduced to its current
level of $.01 per thousand dollars. It is anticipated that the legislature
will continue to reduce or possibly eliminate the tax in future years.
8
<PAGE>
The Florida Constitution limits the total ad valorem property tax that may be
levied by each county, municipality and school district to ten mills (1.0% of
value). The limit applies only to taxes levied for operating purposes and
excludes taxes levied for the payment of bonds. This restricts the operating
flexibility of local governments in the state and may result from time to
time in budget deficits for some local units.
Financial The Florida Constitution and Statutes mandate that the state budget
as a whole, and each separate fund within the state budget, be kept in
balance from currently available revenues each state fiscal year (July 1-June
30). The Governor and Comptroller are responsible for insuring that
sufficient revenues are collected to meet appropriations and that no deficit
occurs in any state fund.
The state's revenue structure is narrowly based, relying on the sales and
selective sales tax for 75% of its general revenues. This structure has
brought some volatility to the state's finances, demonstrated most recently
when the state developed budget shortfalls in fiscal years 1991 and 1992.
Additionally, the ongoing moratorium one Commerce and internet sales tax
could affect the states general revenues if such sales are allowed to
continue without taxation. The state's location also leaves it vulnerable to
natural disasters such as hurricanes. While these events can be devastating,
the impact can sometimes be stimulative to the economy. For example, the
state's finances received a substantial boost in fiscal 1993 as a result of
increased economic activity associated with rebuilding efforts after
Hurricane Andrew, which hit south Florida on August 24, 1992. Finally, in
1996 Florida settled a lawsuit with the tobacco industry where the state
sought to recover the costs associated with tobacco usage by Floridians. The
total amount expected to be collected from the tobacco companies through the
settlement is estimated to be $13 billion over 25 years. This money is
earmarked to be used for children's health coverage, to reimburse the state
for smoking related medical expenses and for state enforcement efforts to
reduce sales of tobacco products. To date, settlement collections of $1
billion have been reported by the state.
In November 1994, state voters passed a proposal to limit state revenue
growth to the average annual growth in personal income over the previous five
years. The cap excludes revenue to pay certain expenditures, including debt
service. The limitation should not pose an onerous burden on state finance.
However, the demand for governmental services continues to grow because of
above-average population growth and demographics.
Sectors Certain areas of potential investment concentration present unique
risks. For example, a significant portion of the fund's assets may be
invested in health care issues.
For over a decade, the hospital industry has been under significant pressure
to reduce expenses and shorten length of stay, a phenomenon which has
negatively affected the financial health of many hospitals. All hospitals are
dependent on third-party reimbursement sources such as the federal Medicare
and state Medicaid programs or private insurers. To the extent these payors
reduce reimbursement levels, the individual hospitals may be affected. In the
face of these pressures, the trend of hospital mergers and acquisitions has
accelerated in recent years. These organizational changes present both risks
and opportunities for the institutions involved. Due to the high proportion
of elderly residents, Florida hospitals tend to be highly dependent on
Medicare. In addition to the regulations imposed by Medicare, the state also
regulates health care. A state board must approve the budgets of all Florida
hospitals; certificates of need are required for all significant capital
expenditures. The primary management objective is cost control. The inability
of some hospitals to achieve adequate cost control while operating in a
competitive environment has led to a number of hospital bond defaults.
The fund may from time to time invest in electric revenue issues which have
exposure to or participate in nuclear power plants which could affect the
issuers' financial performance. Such risks include unexpected outages or
plant shutdowns, increased Nuclear Regulatory Commission surveillance or
inadequate rate relief. In addition, the financial performance of electric
utilities may be impacted by increased competition and deregulation in the
electric utility industry.
The fund may invest in private activity bond issues for corporate and
nonprofit borrowers. These issues, sold through various governmental
conduits, are backed solely by the revenues pledged by the respective
borrowing corporations. No government support is implied.
9
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A GEORGIA PORTFOLIO
The fund's concentration in the debt obligations of one state carries a
higher risk than a portfolio that is geographically diversified. In addition
to State of Georgia general obligations and state agency issues, the fund
will invest in local bond issues, lease obligations and revenue bonds, the
credit quality and risk of which will vary according to each security's own
structure and underlying economics.
Debt The State of Georgia and its local governments issued $5.6 billion in
municipal bonds in 1999, a 7% decrease from the previous year. As of May 8,
2000, the state was rated Aaa by Moody's and AAA by S&P and Fitch.
The State of Georgia currently has net direct obligations of approximately
$5.2 billion. Since 1973, when a Constitutional Amendment authorizing the
issuance of state general obligation (GO) bonds was implemented, the state
has funded most of its capital needs through the issuance of GO bonds.
Previously, capital requirements were funded through the issuance of bonds by
10 separate authorities and secured by lease rental agreements and annual
state appropriations. Its Constitution permits the state to issue bonds for
two types of public purposes: (1) general obligation debt and (2) guaranteed
revenue debt. The Constitution imposes certain debt limits and controls. GO
debt service cannot exceed 10% of total revenue receipts less refunds of the
state treasury. GO bonds have a maximum maturity of 25 years and 67% of the
state's debt is scheduled to be retired in 10 years or less. Maximum GO debt
service requirements are well below the legal limit at 5.1% of fiscal year
1999 treasury receipts.
Georgia has also taken the step to establish "debt affordability" limits
which state that outstanding debt will not exceed 2.7% of personal income or
that maximum annual debt service will not exceed 5% of prior years revenues.
State debt issuance in the next few years will be limited so that the state
will decrease to these levels.
In addition to the general obligation and lease-backed debt described above,
$318 million bonds have been issued and are outstanding by the Georgia World
Congress Authority and $754 million bonds have been issued and are
outstanding by the Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, none of which
represent direct obligations of the state.
Economy The State of Georgia has a population of approximately 7.6 million,
making it the 10th largest state. Since the 1960s, the state's population has
grown at a rate exceeding the national average, with the growth rate during
the 1980s nearly twice that of the entire country. Stable to strong economic
growth during the 1980s was led by the Atlanta metropolitan statistical area,
where approximately 45% of the state's population is located. This area
includes the capital city of Atlanta, and 18 surrounding counties. The next
largest metropolitan area is the Columbus-Muscogee area followed by the Macon
area.
The state's economy is well diversified. The current labor force of 4 million
is largely concentrated in service and wholesale/retail trade jobs, followed
by lesser amounts in manufacturing and government. Employment gains have
substantially exceeded the region and the U.S. since 1980. Georgia's one year
employment growth (February 1999 to February 2000) stood at 4.6% compared to
the national rate of 2.4%. The state's economy continues to outperform the
nation. Georgia's per capita income has steadily improved against the
national average since the 1960s and currently is 94% of the U.S. and 105% of
the Southeast region.
Financial To a large degree, the creditworthiness of the portfolio is
dependent on the financial strength of the State of Georgia and its
localities. During the 1980s, the state's strong economic performance
translated into solid financial performance and the accumulation of
substantial reserves.
During fiscal 1989 to 1991, the state's financial condition was affected by
three years of revenue shortfalls brought on by recession. During these
periods, the Governor called special legislative sessions to enact sizable
spending cuts to achieve budget balance. Economic conditions improved in
1992, allowing the state to restore its financial cushion. Results for fiscal
1998 showed a continuation of this positive trend with a surplus of $685
million and an ending general fund balance of $1.2 billion, or 9% of
revenues.
A significant portion of the portfolio's assets is expected to be invested in
the debt obligations of local governments and public authorities with
investment-grade ratings of BBB or higher. While local governments in Georgia
are primarily reliant on independent revenue sources, such as property taxes,
they are not immune
10
<PAGE>
to budget shortfalls caused by cutbacks in state aid. The fund may purchase
obligations issued by public authorities in Georgia which are not backed by
the full faith and credit of the state and may or may not be subject to
annual appropriations from the State's General Fund. Likewise, certain
enterprises such as water and sewer systems or hospitals may be affected by
changes in economic activity.
Sectors Certain areas of potential investment concentration present unique
risks. A significant portion of the fund's assets may be invested in health
care issues. For over a decade, the hospital industry has been under
significant pressure to reduce expenses and shorten length of stay, a
phenomenon which has negatively affected the financial health of many
hospitals. All hospitals are dependent on third-party reimbursement sources
such as the federal Medicare and state Medicaid programs or private insurers.
To the extent these payors reduce reimbursement levels, the individual
hospitals may be affected. In the face of these pressures, the trend of
hospital mergers and acquisitions has accelerated in recent years. These
organizational changes present both risks and opportunities for the
institutions involved.
The fund may from time to time invest in electric revenue issues which have
exposure to or participate in nuclear power plants which could affect the
issuers' financial performance. Such risks include unexpected outages or
plant shutdowns, increased Nuclear Regulatory Commission surveillance or
inadequate rate relief. In addition, the financial performance of electric
utilities may be impacted by increased competition and deregulation of the
electric utility industry.
The fund may invest in private activity bond issues for corporate and
nonprofit borrowers. These issues sold through various governmental conduits,
are backed solely by the revenues pledged by the respective borrowing
corporations. No governmental support is implied.
RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A MARYLAND PORTFOLIO
The fund's concentration in the debt obligations of one state carries a
higher risk than a portfolio that is more geographically diversified. In
addition to State of Maryland general obligations and state agency issues,
the fund will invest in local bond issues, lease obligations and revenue
bonds, the credit quality and risk of which will vary according to each
security's own structure and underlying economics.
Debt The State of Maryland and its local governments issue two basic types of
debt, with varying degrees of credit risk: general obligation bonds backed by
the unlimited taxing power of the issuer and revenue bonds secured by
specific pledged fees or charges for a related project. Included within the
revenue bond sector are tax-exempt lease obligations that are subject to
annual appropriations of a governmental body, usually with no implied tax or
specific revenue pledge.
The State of Maryland disclosed in its fiscal year 1999 Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR) dated June 30, 1999 that it has approximately $3.5
billion in general obligation bonds outstanding and an additional $1.4
billion in other tax-supported debt. General obligation debt of the State of
Maryland is rated Triple-A by Moody's, S&P, and Fitch. There is no general
debt limit imposed by the State Constitution or public general laws. The
State Constitution imposes a 15-year maturity limit on state general
obligation bonds. Although voters approved a constitutional amendment in 1982
permitting the state to borrow up to $100 million in short-term notes in
anticipation of taxes and revenues, the state has not made use of this
authority.
Many agencies of the state government are authorized to borrow money under
legislation which expressly provides that the loan obligations shall not be
deemed to constitute debt or a pledge of the faith and credit of the state.
The Community Development Administration of the Department of Housing and
Community Development, the Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration of
the Department of Environment, the Maryland State Lottery Agency, certain
State higher education institutions, the Maryland Stadium Authority, the
Maryland Food Center Authority, and the Maryland Environmental Service have
issued and have outstanding bonds of this type. The principal of and interest
on bonds issued by these bodies are payable solely from pledged revenues,
principally fees generated from use of the facilities, enterprises financed
by the bonds, or other dedicated fees.
Economy According to the 1999 CAFR, Maryland experienced solid growth in
calendar year 1998. The strongest areas of employment growth were services,
construction, and government. Total non-agricultural
11
<PAGE>
employment in the State increased 2.5%. The State reports that
non-agricultural employment is expected to grow 2.1% in 1999, slowing to 1.6%
in 2000. Personal income is estimated to grow by 5.7% in 1999, decelerating
slightly to 5.6% in 2000. Projections of slower growth in employment and
personal income reflect the expectation that the nation will experience an
economic slowdown in 2000.
Financial To a large degree, the risk of the portfolio is dependent upon the
financial strength of the State of Maryland and its localities. The State
continues to demonstrate a conservative approach to managing its finances.
Fiscal year 1999 concluded with a general fund operating surplus of $1.1
billion. The general fund balance rose to a healthy $2.0 billion or 16% of
general revenues. The State continues to show strong performance in fiscal
year 2000. In December 1999, the State's Board of Revenue Estimates reported
that revenues for fiscal year 2000 have been revised upward to $9.1 billion,
an increase of $575 million.
Sectors Investment concentration in a particular sector can present unique
risks.
A significant portion of the funds' assets may be invested in health care
issues. For over a decade, the hospital industry has been under significant
pressure to reduce expenses and shorten length of stay, a phenomenon which
has negatively affected the financial health of some hospitals. All hospitals
are dependent on third-party reimbursement mechanisms. At the present time,
Maryland hospitals operate under a system in which reimbursement is
determined by a state-administered set of rates and charges that applies to
all payors. A federal waiver also allows this system to be applied to
Medicare reimbursement rather than the Federal Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)
system required elsewhere. In order to maintain this Medicare waiver, the
cumulative rate of increase in Maryland hospital charges since the base year
1980 must remain below that of U.S. hospitals overall. From 1983 through
1992, the rate of increase for Maryland hospitals was below the national
average; for the seven years from 1993 through 1999, Maryland hospital costs
have grown faster than the national rate, although the cumulative rate of
increase since the base year is still below the national average. Any loss of
the Medicare waiver in the future may have an adverse impact upon the credit
quality of Maryland hospitals.
The fund may from time to time invest in electric revenue issues which have
exposure to or participate in nuclear power plants which could affect the
issuer's financial performance. Such risks include delay in construction and
operation due to increased regulation, unexpected outages or plant shutdowns,
increased Nuclear Regulatory Commission surveillance or inadequate rate
relief. In addition, the financial performance of electric utilities may be
impacted by increased competition and deregulation of the industry.
The fund may invest in private activity bond issues for corporate and
nonprofit borrowers. These issues sold through various governmental conduits
are backed solely by the revenues pledged by the respective borrowing
corporations. No governmental support is implied.
RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW JERSEY PORTFOLIO
The fund's concentration in the debt obligations of one state carries a
higher risk than a portfolio that is more geographically diversified. In
addition to State of New Jersey general obligations and state agency issues,
the fund will invest in local bond issues, lease obligations and revenue
bonds, the credit quality and risk of which will vary according to each
security's own structure and underlying economics.
Debt The State of New Jersey and its local governments issue two basic types
of debt, with varying degrees of credit risk: general obligation bonds backed
by the unlimited taxing power of the issuer and revenue bonds secured by
specific pledged fees or charges for a related project. Included within the
revenue bond sector are tax-exempt lease obligations that are subject to
annual appropriations of a governmental body, usually with no implied tax or
specific revenue pledge.
The State of New Jersey disclosed in its fiscal year 1999 Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report (CAFR) dated June 30, 1999 that it has approximately
$3.6 billion in general obligation bonds outstanding. In addition, the State
has guaranteed the principal and interest payments on certain bonds issued by
the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority and the State has also
contracted with the Authority to provide annual appropriations for payment of
debt service on certain other bonds. As of June 30, 1999, the amounts
outstanding were $111 million and $571 million respectively. The State may
also be required to provide
12
<PAGE>
appropriations to meet a deficiency in debt service payments for the South
Jersey Port Corporation and the New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance
Agency. General obligation debt of the state is rated Aa1 by Moody's and AA+
by S&P and Fitch.
Many agencies of the state government are authorized to borrow money under
legislation which expressly provides that the loan obligations shall not be
deemed to constitute debt or a pledge of the faith and credit of the state.
The New Jersey Building Authority, New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund
Authority, New Jersey Economic Development Authority, New Jersey Educational
Facilities Authority, New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
New Jersey Highway Authority, New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency,
New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority, New Jersey Transit Corporation,
and New Jersey Turnpike Authority have outstanding bonds of this type.
Economy According to the 1999 CAFR, New Jersey's large and diverse economy
had the best two-year period of economic growth from 1997-1998 since
1987-1988. In 1998, personal income grew 5.6% and employment experienced a
second year of 2% growth. Growth is expected to moderate in 1999-2000 as
growth in the nation's economy slows. Employment is projected to grow 1.7% in
1999 and 1.4% in 2000. Personal income growth is expected to remain
approximately 5%. Unemployment dropped to a 4.5% average for 1999, which was
the lowest annual rate in ten years.
Financial To a large degree, the risk of the portfolio is dependent on the
financial strength of the State of New Jersey and its localities. The State
had a stable 1999 fiscal year with a net increase in fund balance of $343
million for a healthy year-end amount of $2.2 billion or about 13% of general
revenues. The New Jersey State Treasurer disclosed on April 12, 2000 that
revenues for the first nine months of the current fiscal year totaled $13.4
billion, about one percent or $118 million below the budget forecast.
Treasurer Machold stated that he was pleased that the budget was within one
percent of the target for the year. Expenditures have also traditionally been
below projected budgeted levels in the State of New Jersey.
Sectors Investment concentration in a particular sector can present unique
risks.
A significant portion of the fund's assets may be invested in health care
issues. For over a decade, the hospital industry has been under significant
pressure to reduce expenses and shorten length of stay, a phenomenon which
has negatively affected the financial health of many hospitals. While each
hospital bond issue is separately secured by the individual hospital's
revenues, third-party reimbursement sources such as the federal Medicare or
Medicaid programs and private insurers are common to all hospitals. To the
extent these payors reduce reimbursement levels, the individual hospitals may
be affected. In the face of these pressures, the trend of hospital mergers
and acquisitions has accelerated in recent years. These organizational
changes present both risks and opportunities for the institutions involved.
The fund may from time to time invest in electric revenue issues which have
exposure to or participate in nuclear power plants which could affect the
issuer's financial performance. Such risks include delay in construction and
operation due to increased regulation, unexpected outages or plant shutdowns,
increased Nuclear Regulatory Commission surveillance or inadequate rate
relief. In addition, financial performance of electric utilities may be
impacted by increased competition and deregulation in the industry.
The fund may invest in private activity bond issues for corporate and
nonprofit borrowers. These issues sold through government conduits, such as
the New Jersey Economic Development Authority and various local issuers, are
backed solely by the revenues pledged by the respective borrowing
corporations. No governmental support is implied. In the past, a number of
New Jersey Economic Development Authority issues have defaulted as a result
of borrower financial difficulties.
The fund may be exposed to solid waste projects. A number of counties and
utility authorities in the state have issued several billion dollars of bonds
to fund incinerator projects and solid waste projects. A federal decision
striking down New Jersey's system of solid waste flow control increases the
potential risk of default absent a legislative solution, or some form of
subsidy by local or state governments.
13
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW YORK PORTFOLIO
The funds' concentration in the debt obligations of one state carries a
higher risk than a portfolio that is geographically diversified. In addition
to state general obligation bonds and notes and the debt of various state
agencies, the fund will invest in local bond issues, lease obligations and
revenue bonds, the credit quality and risk of which will vary according to
each security's own structure and underlying economics.
The funds' ability to maintain a high level of "triple-exempt" income is
primarily dependent upon the ability of New York issuers to continue to meet
debt service obligations in a timely fashion. In 1975 the state, New York
City, and other related issuers experienced serious financial difficulties
that ultimately resulted in much lower credit ratings and loss of access to
the public debt markets. A series of fiscal reforms and an improved economic
climate allowed these entities to return to financial stability by the early
1980s. Credit ratings were reinstated or raised and access to the public
credit markets was restored. During the early 1990s, the State and City
confronted renewed fiscal pressure, as the region suffered moderate economic
decline. Conditions began to improve in 1993, though below-average economic
performance and tight budgetary conditions persisted. Both entities
experienced financial relief in fiscal 1997 because of the strong national
economy, a robust financial services sector, and vigilant spending control.
The State and City continue to face out-year budget gaps due to spending
growth which is anticipated to outpace revenue growth.
New York State
The state, its agencies, and local governments issued $20.1 billion in
long-term municipal bonds in 1999, a 44% decrease from the previous year. As
of March 31, 2000, total state-related bonded debt was projected to be $35.4
billion, of which $4.8 billion was general obligation debt and $30.6 billion
was financed under lease-purchase or other contractual obligations. In
addition, the state had $293 million in bond anticipation notes outstanding.
Since 1993, the state has not issued Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes
(TRANs) terminating the practice of annual seasonal borrowing which had
occurred since 1952. As of May 8, 2000, the state's general obligation bonds
were rated A2 by Moody's, A+ by S&P and A+ by Fitch. All general obligation
bonds must be approved by the voters prior to issuance. The state no longer
seeks rating from Moody's however.
The fiscal stability of the state is also important for numerous authorities
which have responsibilities for financing, constructing, and operating
revenue-producing public benefit facilities. As of May 8, 2000, there were 17
authorities that had aggregate debt outstanding, including refunding bonds
and combined with state debt, of $95 billion. This makes New York State by
far the largest debt issuer in the country.
The authorities most reliant upon annual direct state support include the
Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA), the Urban Development Authority (UDC) -
now the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), and the New York Housing
Finance Agency (HFA). In February 1975, the UDC defaulted on approximately
$1.0 billion of short-term notes. The default was ultimately cured by the
creation of the Project Finance Authority (PFA), through which the state
provided assistance to the UDC, including support for debt service. Since
then, there have been no additional defaults by state authorities although
substantial annual assistance is required by the MTA and the HFA in
particular.
Subsequent to the fiscal crisis of the mid-70s, New York State maintained
balanced operations on a cash basis, although by 1992 it had built up an
accumulated general fund deficit of over $6 billion on a Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) basis. This deficit consisted mainly of overdue
tax refunds and payments due localities.
To resolve its accumulated general fund deficit the state established the
Local Government Assistance Corporation (LGAC) in 1990. A total of $5.2
billion in LGAC bonds have been issued. The proceeds of these bonds were used
to provide the state's assistance to localities and school districts,
enabling the state to reduce its accumulated general fund deficit. State
short-term borrowing requirements, which peaked at a record $5.9 billion in
fiscal 1991, have been reduced to zero. Due to a strong Wall Street
performance and a booming economy, New York ended fiscal 1999 with an
accumulated surplus of $1.66 billion. The adopted budget for fiscal 2000
included tax cuts and a debt reform. Spending is projected to increase by
5.6%, a rate that is above projected inflation. Because of strong growth in
personal income and business taxes, fiscal year 1999 ended
14
<PAGE>
with an operating surplus of $1.08 billion, which helped smooth budget
balancing efforts for fiscal year 2000. Fiscal year 2000 is estimated to have
ended with another large operating surplus.
New York State has a large, diversified economy which has witnessed a basic
shift away from manufacturing toward service sector employment. In 1999, per
capita income in New York State was $30,752, 20% above the national average.
Like most northeastern states, New York suffered a population loss during the
1970s. However, during the 1980's that trend reversed and population
increased slightly, standing at 18,175,301 in 1999. During 1990-1992, the
state experienced a slowing of economic growth evidenced by the loss of
425,000 jobs. Conditions have improved with non-farm employment growing by
3.1% as of February 2000 compared to 2.4% the prior year. Concerns over the
state's economy continue to focus on the slow growth of the upstate region in
comparison to the New York City region.
New York City
The financial problems of New York City were acute between 1975 and 1979,
highlighted by a payment moratorium on the City's short-term obligations. In
the subsequent decade, the City made a significant recovery. The most
important contribution to the City's fiscal recovery was the creation of the
Municipal Assistance Corporation for the City of New York (MAC). Backed by
sales, use, stock transfer, and other taxes, MAC issued bonds and used the
proceeds to purchase City bonds and notes. Although the MAC bonds met with
reluctance by investors at first, the program has proven to be very
successful.
Much progress has been made since the fiscal crisis of 1975. By 1981, the
City achieved a budget balanced in accordance with GAAP and has continued to
generate small surpluses on an operating basis. By 1983, the City eliminated
its accumulated General Fund deficit and as of the fiscal year ending June
30, 1999, had a total General Fund balance of $388 million. Although the City
continues to finance its seasonal cash flow needs through public borrowings,
the total amount of these borrowings has not exceeded 10% of any year's
revenues and all have been repaid by the end of the fiscal year.
As of May 1, 1999 the City's general obligation bonds are rated A3 by
Moody's, A- by S&P and A by Fitch.
While New York City sustained a decade long record of relative financial
stability, during the 1990's budgetary pressures have been evident. Its major
revenue sources, income and sales taxes, were slowed and a downturn in the
real estate market reduced property tax revenues. Nonetheless, the City
concluded the 1999 fiscal year with an operating surplus of $1.66 billion.
The City's finances have been bolstered by strong tax receipts growth, fueled
by strong financial markets over the last several years. Revenues and
expenditures for the 1999 fiscal year were balanced in accordance with GAAP
for the nineteenth consecutive year. New York City remains exposed to future
budget pressure should there be a sharp downturn in the financial services
sector, though it has established a budget stabilization account for
contingency.
Long Island and LILCO
The Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) was the single largest property
taxpayer in both Nassau and Suffolk Counties. LILCO experienced substantial
financial difficulty primarily arising from problems related to its completed
but unlicensed 809 megawatt Shoreham Nuclear Power Facility located in
Suffolk County. In 1986, the State Legislature created the Long Island Power
Authority (LIPA) and ownership of the Shoreham Plant was subsequently
transferred to LIPA for one dollar in exchange for certain rate benefits to
LILCO.
As requested by the Governor, LIPA proposed a plan to restructure LILCO,
reduce rates on Long Island and provide a framework for long-term competition
in power production. With the issuance of $7 billion in debt, LIPA purchased
LILCO common stock, acquired or redeemed certain preferred stock and
outstanding debt, and funded the cost of certain rebates and credits to
LIPA's customers. With these purchases, LIPA acquired LILCO's electric
transmission and distribution system, its 18% ownership interest in the Nine
Mile Point 2 nuclear plant and the regulatory asset of Shoreham. In May 1998,
LIPA sold its first two series of bonds amounting to $4.9 billion. This
allowed for the acquisition of LILCO by LIPA and a merger of the remaining
portions of the former LILCO business with Keyspan Energy to form Marketspan
Corp. LIPA will now be the provider of retail electric service throughout
most of Long Island. In 2000, LIPA and Suffolk County finally reached a
settlement of County's tax liability for the Shoreham plant.
15
<PAGE>
Sectors Certain areas of potential investment concentration present unique
risks. A significant portion of the fund's assets may be invested in health
care issues. For over a decade, the hospital industry has been under
significant pressure to reduce expenses and shorten length of stay, a
phenomenon which has negatively affected the financial health of many
hospitals. While each hospital bond issue is separately secured by the
individual hospital's revenues, third-party reimbursement sources such as the
federal Medicare and state Medicaid programs or private insurers are common
to all hospitals. To the extent these third-party payors reduce reimbursement
levels, the individual hospitals may be affected. The state's support for
Medicaid and health services has slowed over the last several years. In 1997
health care reform was implemented. Under the new system, hospitals are
permitted to negotiate inpatient payment rates with private payors. In
addition, the federal balanced budget act of 1997 contains provisions to
reduce Medicare expenditures. In the face of these pressures, the trend of
hospital mergers and acquisitions has accelerated in recent years. These
organizational changes present both risks and opportunities for the
institutions.
The funds may from time to time invest in electric revenue issues which have
exposure to or participate in nuclear power plants which could affect the
issuers' financial performance. Such risks include unexpected outages or plan
shutdowns, increased Nuclear Regulatory Commission surveillance or inadequate
rate relief. In addition, the financial performance of electric utilities may
be impacted by increased competition and deregulation in the industry.
The funds may invest in private activity bond issues for corporate and
nonprofit borrowers. These issues sold through various governmental conduits,
are backed solely by the revenues pledged by the respective borrowing
corporations. No governmental support is implied.
RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A VIRGINIA PORTFOLIO
The funds' concentration in the debt obligations of one state carries a
higher risk than a portfolio that is geographically diversified. In addition
to Commonwealth of Virginia general obligations and agency issues, the fund
will invest in local bond issues, lease obligations and revenue bonds, the
credit quality and risk of which will vary according to each security's own
structure and underlying economics.
Debt The Commonwealth of Virginia and its local governments issued $4.3
billion of municipal bonds in 1999, including general obligation debt backed
by the unlimited taxing power of the issuer and revenue bonds secured by
specific pledged fees or charges for an enterprise or project. Included
within the revenue bond category are tax-exempt lease obligations that are
subject to annual appropriations of a governmental body to meet debt service,
usually with no implied tax or specific revenue pledge. Debt issued in 1999
was for a wide variety of public purposes, including transportation, housing,
education, health care, and industrial development.
As of June 30, 1999, the Commonwealth of Virginia had $1.1 billion
outstanding general obligation bonds secured by the Commonwealth's revenue
and taxing power, a modest amount compared to many other states. Under state
law, general obligation debt is limited to 1.15 times the average of the
preceding three years' income tax and sales and use tax collections. The
Commonwealth's outstanding general obligation debt is well below that limit
and over 90% of the debt service is actually met from revenue producing
capital projects such as universities and toll roads.
The Commonwealth also supports $2.0 billion in debt issued by the Virginia
Public Building Authority, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, the
Virginia College Building Authority, the Virginia Biotechnology Research Park
Authority, the Virginia Port Authority, and the Innovative Technology
Authority for transportation purposes. These bonds are not backed by the full
faith and credit of the Commonwealth but instead, are subject to annual
appropriations from the Commonwealth's General Fund.
In addition to the Commonwealth and public authorities described above, an
additional $8.2 billion in bonds has been issued by special public
authorities in Virginia that are not obligations of the Commonwealth. These
bonds include debt issued by the Virginia Public School Authority, the
Virginia Resources Authority, and the Virginia Housing Development Authority.
16
<PAGE>
Economy The Commonwealth of Virginia has a population of approximately 6.8
million, making it the twelfth largest state. Since the 1930s the
Commonwealth's population has grown at a rate near or exceeding the national
average. Stable to strong economic growth during the 1980s was led by the
northern Virginia area outside of Washington, D.C. where approximately 30% of
the Commonwealth's population is concentrated. The next largest metropolitan
area is the Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News area, followed by the
Richmond-Petersburg area, including the Commonwealth's capital of Richmond.
The Commonwealth's economy is broadly based, with a large concentration in
service and governmental jobs, followed by manufacturing. Virginia has
significant concentrations of high technology employers, with nearly 150,000
people employed in 3,900 establishments. Per capita income exceeds national
averages while unemployment figures have consistently tracked below national
averages.
Financial To a large degree, the risk of the portfolio is dependent on the
financial strength of the Commonwealth of Virginia and its localities.
Virginia is rated AAA by Moody's, S&P and Fitch. The Commonwealth's budget is
prepared on a biennial basis. From 1970 through 1998 the General Fund showed
a positive balance for all of its two-year budgetary periods. The national
recession and its negative effects on Virginia's personal income tax
collections did, however, force the Commonwealth to draw down its General
Fund balances to a deficit position in 1992. Spending cuts and improved
economic conditions allowed for positive operations from 1993 on. The
Commonwealth posted a budgetary surplus for fiscal years 1995 to 1999 despite
federal retiree settlements and other transfers. On June 30, 1999, the
unreserved general fund balance, including a revenue stabilization account,
totaled $983 million.
A significant portion of the funds' assets is expected to be invested in the
debt obligations of local governments and public authorities with
investment-grade ratings of BBB or higher. While local governments in
Virginia are primarily reliant on independent revenue sources, such as
property taxes, they are not immune to budget shortfalls caused by cutbacks
in state aid. Likewise, certain enterprises such as toll roads or hospitals
may be affected by changes in economic activity.
Sectors Certain areas of potential investment concentration present unique
risks. A significant portion of the fund's assets may be invested in health
care issues. For over a decade, the hospital industry has been under
significant pressure to reduce expenses and shorten length of stay, a
phenomenon which has negatively affected the financial health of many
hospitals. While each hospital bond issue is separately secured by the
individual hospital's revenues, third-party reimbursement sources such as the
federal Medicare and state Medicaid programs or private insurers are common
to all hospitals. To the extent these payors reduce reimbursement levels, the
individual hospitals may be affected. In the face of these pressures, the
trend of hospital mergers and acquisitions has accelerated in recent years.
These organizational changes present both risks and opportunities for the
institutions involved.
The funds may from time to time invest in electric revenue issues which have
exposure to or participate in nuclear power plants which could affect the
issuers' financial performance. Such risks include unexpected outages or
plant shutdowns, increased Nuclear Regulatory Commission surveillance or
inadequate rate relief.
The funds may invest in private activity bond issues for corporate and
nonprofit borrowers. These issues sold through various governmental conduits
are backed solely by the revenues pledged by the respective borrowing
corporations. No governmental support is implied.
All Funds
Puerto Rico From time to time the funds invest in obligations of the
Commonwealth of the Puerto Rico and its public corporations which are exempt
from general state and city or local income taxes. The majority of the
Commonwealth's debt is issued by the major public agencies that are
responsible for many of the island's public functions, such as water,
wastewater, highways, telecommunications, education and public construction.
In 1999, issuance in the Commonwealth totaled $1.6 billion, a decrease of 67%
from the previous year total of $5 billion. As of June 30, 1999, public
sector debt issued by the Commonwealth and its public corporations totaled
approximately $24 billion.
Since the 1980's Puerto Rico's economy and financial operations have
paralleled the economic cycles of the United States. The island's economy,
particularly the manufacturing sector has experienced substantial gains
17
<PAGE>
in employment. Much of these economic gains are attributable in part to
favorable treatment under Section 936 of the Federal Internal Revenue Code
for United States corporations doing business in Puerto Rico. The number of
persons employed in Puerto Rico during fiscal year 1999 reached 1.1 million
people. The number of unemployed citizens, however, remains high at 11.2
percent but has been decreasing consistently over the past several years.
Debt ratios for the Commonwealth remain high as it assumes much of the
responsibility for the local infrastructure. Sizable infrastructure programs
are ongoing to upgrade the island's water, sewer and transportation systems.
The Commonwealth's general obligation debt is secured by a first lien on
revenues. The Commonwealth has maintained a fiscal policy which seeks to
correlate the growth in spending with the growth of the economic base
available to service that debt. Between fiscal years 1996 and 1999, however
the debt increased 27% while gross product rose 15%. Short-term debt remained
a modest 7.8% of total debt outstanding as of June 30, 1999. The maximum
annual debt service requirement on Commonwealth general obligation debt
totals 8.9% of governmental revenues for fiscal year 1998. This is well below
the 15% limit imposed by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico but if other public
corporation debt is included, the number rises significantly. This level of
debt continues to be of concern.
The fiscal year 1994 budget was balanced with an increase in the tollgate tax
on Section 936 companies and improved revenue collections, which enabled the
Commonwealth to record a strong turnaround in the General Fund balance to
$309 million (6.8% of general fund expenses). A General Fund balance of $185
million was recorded for the end of fiscal year 1999. At 1.9% of general fund
revenues, this reserve level is low compared to other states.
The Commonwealth's economy remains vulnerable to changes in oil prices,
American trade, foreign policy, levels of foreign assistance, and natural
disasters. On September 21, 1998, Puerto Rico was directly hit by Hurricane
Georges, which caused extensive public and private damage. Despite the
overall destructiveness of the storm, the net impact may have been positive,
as aid from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and insurers is estimated
to exceed $3 billion.
Per capita income levels, while being the highest in the Caribbean, lag far
behind the United States. In 1997 legislation was introduced proposing a
mechanism to permanently settle the political relationship with the United
States. In March 1998, the U.S. House of Representatives voted in favor of a
political status act that includes a referendum and a 10-year transition
plan. A referendum held in December of 1998 resulted in an ambiguous outcome
to the status question. Of the voting options available, a majority of voters
opted for the choice labeled "None of the Above." While there are various
interpretations to this result, it remains clear that no definite resolution
to the status issue is anticipated in the near future.
For many years U.S. companies operating in Puerto Rico were eligible to
receive a special tax credit available under Section 936 of the federal tax
code, which helped spur significant expansion in capital intensive
manufacturing activity. Federal tax legislation was passed in 1993 which
revised the tax benefits received by U.S. corporations (Section 936 firms)
that operate manufacturing facilities in Puerto Rico. The legislation
provides these firms with two options: a 5-year phased reduction of the
income based tax credit to 40% of the previously allowable credit or the
conversion to a wage based standard, allowing a tax credit for the first 60%
of qualified compensation paid to employees as defined in the IRS Code.
Studies indicate that there have been no reductions in the economic growth
rate or employment in industries which were expected to be impacted by the
1993 amendments. In 1996, amendments were signed into law to phase out the
tax credit over a 10-year period for existing claimants and to eliminate it
for corporations without established operations after October 1995. At
present, it is difficult to forecast what the short- and long-term effects of
a phaseout of the Section 936 credit would have on the Puerto Rican economy.
A final risk factor with Commonwealth is the large amount of unfunded pension
liabilities. The two main public pension systems are largely unfunded. The
employees retirement system has an unfunded liability of $6 billion and the
teachers retirement system has an unfunded liability of $1 billion. The
government is working to resolve the liability as evidenced by the use of a
portion of the proceeds of a sale of the Puerto Rican Telephone Company to
cover a portion of the fund's deficiency.
18
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH TAX-EFFICIENT GROWTH AND TAX-EFFICIENT
MULTI-CAP GROWTH FUNDS AND THE EQUITY PORTION OF TAX-EFFICIENT BALANCED FUND
Foreign Securities
The fund may invest in U.S. dollar-denominated and non-U.S.
dollar-denominated securities of foreign issuers.
Investments may be made in foreign securities. These include
nondollar-denominated securities traded outside of the U.S. and
dollar-denominated securities of foreign issuers traded in the U.S. (such as
Yankee bonds). Such investments increase a portfolio's diversification and
may enhance return, but they also involve some special risks, such as
exposure to potentially adverse local, political, and economic developments;
nationalization and exchange controls; potentially lower liquidity and higher
volatility; possible problems arising from accounting, disclosure,
settlement, and regulatory practices that differ from U.S. standards; and the
chance that fluctuations in foreign exchange rates will decrease the
investment's value (favorable changes can increase its value). These risks
are heightened for investments in developing countries, and there is no limit
on the amount of fund foreign investments that may be made in such countries.
INVESTMENT PROGRAM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Types of Securities
Set forth below is additional information about certain of the investments
described in each fund's prospectus.
All Funds (other than Tax-Efficient Growth and Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth
Funds)
Municipal Securities
Subject to the investment objectives and programs described in the prospectus
and the additional investment restrictions described in this Statement of
Additional Information, each fund's portfolio may consist of any combination
of the various types of municipal securities described below or other types
of municipal securities that may be developed. The amount of each fund's
assets invested in any particular type of municipal security can be expected
to vary.
The term "municipal securities" means obligations issued by or on behalf of
states, territories, and possessions of the United States and the District of
Columbia and their political subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities, as
well as certain other persons and entities, the interest from which is exempt
from federal, state, and/or city or local, if applicable, income tax. In
determining the tax-exempt status of a municipal security, the fund relies on
the opinion of the issuer's bond counsel at the time of the issuance of the
security. However, it is possible this opinion could be overturned, and as a
result, the interest received by the fund from such a security might not be
exempt from federal income tax.
Municipal securities are classified by maturity as notes, bonds, or
adjustable rate securities.
Municipal Notes
Municipal notes generally are used to provide short-term operating or capital
needs and generally have maturities of one year or less. Municipal notes
include:
. Tax Anticipation Notes Tax anticipation notes are issued to finance working
capital needs of municipalities. Generally, they are issued in anticipation
of various seasonal tax revenue, such as income, property, use and business
taxes, and are payable from these specific future taxes.
. Revenue Anticipation Notes Revenue anticipation notes are issued in
expectation of receipt of revenues, such as sales taxes, toll revenues or
water and sewer charges, that are used to pay off the notes.
19
<PAGE>
. Bond Anticipation Notes Bond anticipation notes are issued to provide
interim financing until long-term financing can be arranged. In most cases,
the long-term bonds then provide the money for the repayment of the notes.
. Tax-Exempt Commercial Paper Tax-exempt commercial paper is a short-term
obligation with a stated maturity of 270 days or less. It is issued by state
and local governments or their agencies to finance seasonal working capital
needs or as short-term financing in anticipation of longer-term financing.
. Municipal Bonds Municipal bonds, which meet longer-term capital needs and
generally have maturities of more than one year when issued, have two
principal classifications: general obligation bonds and revenue bonds. Two
additional categories of potential purchases are lease revenue bonds and
pre-refunded/escrowed to maturity bonds. Another type of municipal bond is
referred to as an Industrial Development Bond.
. General Obligation Bonds Issuers of general obligation bonds include states,
counties, cities, towns, and special districts. The proceeds of these
obligations are used to fund a wide range of public projects, including
construction or improvement of schools, public buildings, highways and roads,
and general projects not supported by user fees or specifically identified
revenues. The basic security behind general obligation bonds is the issuer's
pledge of its full faith and credit and taxing power for the payment of
principal and interest. The taxes that can be levied for the payment of debt
service may be limited or unlimited as to the rate or amount of special
assessments. In many cases voter approval is required before an issuer may
sell this type of bond.
. Revenue Bonds The principal security for a revenue bond is generally the net
revenues derived from a particular facility, or enterprise, or in some cases,
the proceeds of a special charge or other pledged revenue source. Revenue
bonds are issued to finance a wide variety of capital projects including:
electric, gas, water and sewer systems; highways, bridges, and tunnels; port
and airport facilities; colleges and universities; and hospitals. Revenue
bonds are sometimes used to finance various privately operated facilities
provided they meet certain tests established for tax-exempt status.
Although the principal security behind these bonds may vary, many provide
additional security in the form of a mortgage or debt service reserve fund.
Some authorities provide further security in the form of the state's ability
(without obligation) to make up deficiencies in the debt service reserve
fund. Revenue bonds usually do not require prior voter approval before they
may be issued.
. Lease Revenue Bonds Municipal borrowers may also finance capital
improvements or purchases with tax-exempt leases. The security for a lease is
generally the borrower's pledge to make annual appropriations for lease
payments. The lease payment is treated as an operating expense subject to
appropriation risk and not a full faith and credit obligation of the issuer.
Lease revenue bonds are generally considered less secure than a general
obligation or revenue bond and often do not include a debt service reserve
fund. To the extent the fund's Board determines such securities are illiquid,
they will be subject to the fund's limit on illiquid securities. There have
also been certain legal challenges to the use of lease revenue bonds in
various states.
The liquidity of such securities will be determined based on a variety of
factors which may include, among others: (1) the frequency of trades and
quotes for the obligation; (2) the number of dealers willing to purchase or
sell the security and the number of other potential buyers; (3) the
willingness of dealers to undertake to make a market in the security; (4) the
nature of the marketplace trades, including the time needed to dispose of the
security, the method of soliciting offers, and the mechanics of transfer; and
(5) the rating assigned to the obligation by an established rating agency or
T. Rowe Price.
. Pre-refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds Certain municipal bonds have been
refunded with a later bond issue from the same issuer. The proceeds from the
later issue are used to defease the original issue. In many cases the
original issue cannot be redeemed or repaid until the first call date or
original maturity date. In these cases, the refunding bond proceeds typically
are used to buy U.S. Treasury securities that are held in an escrow account
until the original call date or maturity date. The original bonds then become
"pre-refunded" or "escrowed to maturity" and are considered as high-quality
investments. While still tax-exempt, the security is the proceeds of the
escrow account. To the extent permitted by the SEC and the Internal Revenue
Service, a fund's investment in such securities refunded with U.S. Treasury
securities will, for purposes of diversification rules applicable to the
fund, be considered as an investment in U.S. Treasury securities.
20
<PAGE>
. Private Activity Bonds Under current tax law all municipal debt is divided
broadly into two groups: governmental purpose bonds and private activity
bonds. Governmental purpose bonds are issued to finance traditional public
purpose projects such as public buildings and roads. Private activity bonds
may be issued by a state or local government or public authority but
principally benefit private users and are considered taxable unless a
specific exemption is provided.
The tax code currently provides exemptions for certain private activity bonds
such as not-for-profit hospital bonds, small-issue industrial development
revenue bonds and mortgage subsidy bonds, which may still be issued as
tax-exempt bonds. Some, but not all, private activity bonds are subject to
alternative minimum tax.
. Industrial Development Bonds Industrial development bonds are considered
Municipal Bonds if the interest paid is exempt from federal income tax. They
are issued by or on behalf of public authorities to raise money to finance
various privately operated facilities for business and manufacturing,
housing, sports, and pollution control. These bonds are also used to finance
public facilities such as airports, mass transit systems, ports, and parking.
The payment of the principal and interest on such bonds is dependent solely
on the ability of the facility's user to meet its financial obligations and
the pledge, if any, of real and personal property so financed as security for
such payment.
Adjustable Rate Securities
Municipal securities may be issued with adjustable interest rates that are
reset periodically by pre-determined formulas or indexes in order to minimize
movements in the principal value of the investment. Such securities may have
long-term maturities, but may be treated as a short-term investment under
certain conditions. Generally, as interest rates decrease or increase, the
potential for capital appreciation or depreciation on these securities is
less than for fixed-rate obligations. These securities may take the following
forms:
Variable Rate Securities Variable rate instruments are those whose terms
provide for the adjustment of their interest rates on set dates and
which, upon such adjustment, can reasonably be expected to have a market
value that approximates its par value. Subject to the provisions of Rule
2a-7 under the 1940 Act, (1) a variable rate instrument, the principal
amount of which is scheduled to be paid in 397 days or less, is deemed to
have a maturity equal to the period remaining until the next readjustment
of the interest; (2) a variable rate instrument which is subject to a
demand feature which entitles the purchaser to receive the principal
amount of the underlying security or securities either (i) upon notice of
usually 30 days, or (ii) at specified intervals not exceeding 397 days
and upon no more than 30 days' notice is deemed to have a maturity equal
to the longer of the period remaining until the next readjustment of the
interest rate or the period remaining until the principal amount can be
recovered through demand; and (3) an instrument that is issued or
guaranteed by the U.S. government or any agency thereof which has a
variable rate of interest readjusted no less frequently than every 762
days may be deemed to have a maturity equal to the period remaining until
the next readjustment of the interest rate. Should the provisions of Rule
2a-7 change, the funds will determine the maturity of these securities in
accordance with the amended provisions of such rule.
Floating Rate Securities Floating rate instruments are those whose terms
provide for the adjustment of their interest rates whenever a specified
interest rate changes and which, at any time, can reasonably be expected
to have a market value that approximates its par value. Subject to the
provisions of Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, (1) the maturity of a
floating rate instrument is deemed to be the period remaining until the
date (noted on the face of the instrument) on which the principal amount
must be paid, or in the case of an instrument called for redemption, the
date on which the redemption payment must be made; and (2) floating rate
instruments with demand features are deemed to have a maturity equal to
the period remaining until the principal amount can be recovered through
demand. Should the provisions of Rule 2a-7 change, the funds will
determine the maturity of these securities in accordance with the amended
provisions or such rule.
Put Option Bonds Long-term obligations with maturities longer than one year
may provide purchasers an optional or mandatory tender of the security at par
value at predetermined intervals, often ranging from one
21
<PAGE>
month to several years (e.g., a 30-year bond with a five-year tender period).
These instruments are deemed to have a maturity equal to the period remaining
to the put date.
Participation Interests The funds may purchase from third parties
participation interests in all or part of specific holdings of municipal
securities. The purchase may take different forms: in the case of short-term
securities, the participation may be backed by a liquidity facility that
allows the interest to be sold back to the third party (such as a trust,
broker or bank) for a predetermined price of par at stated intervals. The
seller may receive a fee from the funds in connection with the arrangement.
In the case of longer-term bonds, the funds may purchase interests in a pool
of municipal bonds or a single municipal bond or lease without the right to
sell the interest back to the third party.
The funds will not purchase participation interests unless a satisfactory
opinion of counsel or ruling of the Internal Revenue Service has been issued
that the interest earned from the municipal securities on which the funds
hold participation interests is exempt from federal income tax to the funds.
However, there is no guarantee the IRS would treat such interest income as
tax-exempt.
Bond and Balanced Funds
. Residual Interest Bonds are a type of high-risk derivative. The funds may
purchase municipal bond issues that are structured as two-part, residual
interest bond and variable rate security offerings. The issuer is obligated
only to pay a fixed amount of tax-free income that is to be divided among the
holders of the two securities. The interest rate for the holders of the
variable rate securities will be determined by an index or auction process
held approximately every seven to 35 days while the bondholders will receive
all interest paid by the issuer minus the amount given to the variable rate
security holders and a nominal auction fee. Therefore, the coupon of the
residual interest bonds, and thus the income received, will move inversely
with respect to short-term, seven- to 35-day tax-exempt interest rates. There
is no assurance that the auction will be successful and that the variable
rate security will provide short-term liquidity. The issuer is not obligated
to provide such liquidity. In general, these securities offer a significant
yield advantage over standard municipal securities, due to the uncertainty of
the shape of the yield curve (i.e., short-term versus long-term rates) and
consequent income flows.
Unlike many adjustable rate securities, residual interest bonds are not
necessarily expected to trade at par and in fact present significant market
risks. In certain market environments, residual interest bonds may carry
substantial premiums or be at deep discounts. This is a relatively new
product in the municipal market with limited liquidity to date.
. Embedded Interest Rate Swaps and Caps In a fixed rate, long-term municipal
bond with an interest rate swap attached to it, the bondholder usually
receives the bond's fixed coupon payment as well as a variable rate payment
that represents the difference between a fixed rate for the term of the swap
(which is typically shorter than the bond it is attached to) and a variable
rate, short-term municipal index. The bondholder receives excess income when
short-term rates remain below the fixed interest rate swap rate. If
short-term rates rise above the fixed income swap rate, the bondholder's
income is reduced. At the end of the interest rate swap term, the bond
reverts to a single fixed coupon payment. Embedded interest rate swaps
enhance yields, but also increase interest rate risk.
An embedded interest rate cap allows the bondholder to receive payments
whenever short-term rates rise above a level established at the time of
purchase. They normally are used to hedge against rising short-term interest
rates. Both instruments may be volatile and of limited liquidity, and their
use may adversely affect the fund's total return.
The funds may invest in other types of derivative instruments as they become
available.
For the purpose of the funds' investment restrictions, the identification of
the "issuer" of municipal securities which are not general obligation bonds
is made by the funds' investment manager, T. Rowe Price, on the basis of the
characteristics of the obligation as described above, the most significant of
which is the source of funds for the payment of principal and interest on
such securities.
22
<PAGE>
There are, of course, other types of securities that are, or may become
available, which are similar to the foregoing and the funds may invest in
these securities.
All Funds (other than Tax-Efficient Growth and Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth
Funds)
When-Issued Securities
New issues of municipal securities are often offered on a when-issued basis;
that is, delivery and payment for the securities normally takes place 15 to
45 days or more after the date of the commitment to purchase. The payment
obligation and the interest rate that will be received on the securities are
each fixed at the time the buyer enters into the commitment. A fund will only
make a commitment to purchase such securities with the intention of actually
acquiring the securities. However, a fund may sell these securities before
the settlement date if it is deemed advisable as a matter of investment
strategy. Each fund will maintain cash, high-grade marketable debt securities
or other suitable cover with its custodian bank equal in value to commitments
for when-issued securities. Such securities either will mature or, if
necessary, be sold on or before the settlement date. Securities purchased on
a when-issued basis and the securities held in a fund's portfolio are subject
to changes in market value based upon the public perception of the
creditworthiness of the issuer and changes in the level of interest rates
(which will generally result in similar changes in value, i.e., both
experiencing appreciation when interest rates decline and depreciation when
interest rates rise). Therefore, to the extent a fund remains fully invested
or almost fully invested at the same time that it has purchased securities on
a when-issued basis, there will be greater fluctuations in its net asset
value than if it solely set aside cash to pay for when-issued securities. In
the case of the money funds, this could increase the possibility that the
market value of the fund's assets could vary from $1.00 per share. In
addition, there will be a greater potential for the realization of capital
gains, which are not exempt from federal income tax. When the time comes to
pay for when-issued securities, a fund will meet its obligations from
then-available cash flow, sale of securities or, although it would not
normally expect to do so, from sale of the when-issued securities themselves
(which may have a value greater or less than the payment obligation). The
policies described in this paragraph are not fundamental and may be changed
by a fund upon notice to its shareholders.
All Funds (other than the Money, Tax-Efficient Growth, and Tax-Efficient
Multi-Cap Growth Funds)
Forwards
The funds may purchase bonds on a when-issued basis with longer than standard
settlement dates, in some cases exceeding one to two years. In such cases,
the funds must execute a receipt evidencing the obligation to purchase the
bond on the specified issue date, and must segregate cash internally to meet
that forward commitment. Municipal "forwards" typically carry a substantial
yield premium to compensate the buyer for the risks associated with a long
when-issued period, including: shifts in market interest rates that could
materially impact the principal value of the bond, deterioration in the
credit quality of the issuer, loss of alternative investment options during
the when-issued period, changes in tax law or issuer actions that would
affect the exempt interest status of the bonds and prevent delivery, failure
of the issuer to complete various steps required to issue the bonds, and
limited liquidity for the buyer to sell the escrow receipts during the
when-issued period.
Investment in Taxable Money Market Securities
Although the funds (other than Tax-Efficient Funds) expect to be solely
invested in municipal securities, for temporary defensive purposes they may
elect to invest in the taxable money market securities listed next (without
limitation) when such action is deemed to be in the best interests of
shareholders. The interest earned on these money market securities is not
exempt from federal income tax and may be taxable to shareholders as ordinary
income.
. U.S. Government Obligations Bills, notes, bonds, and other debt securities
issued by the U.S. Treasury. These are direct obligations of the U.S.
government and differ mainly in the length of their maturities.
. U.S. Government Agency Securities Issued or guaranteed by U.S.
government-sponsored enterprises and federal agencies. These include
securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, Government
National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Land Banks,
Farmers Home Administration,
23
<PAGE>
Banks for Cooperatives, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, Federal Financing
Bank, Farm Credit Banks, the Small Business Association, and the Tennessee
Valley Authority. Some of these securities are supported by the full faith
and credit of the U.S. Treasury; the remainder are supported only by the
credit of the instrumentality, which may or may not include the right of the
issuer to borrow from the Treasury.
. Bank Obligations Certificates of deposit, bankers' acceptances, and other
short-term debt obligations. Certificates of deposit are short-term
obligations of commercial banks. A bankers' acceptance is a time draft drawn
on a commercial bank by a borrower, usually in connection with international
commercial transactions. Certificates of deposit may have fixed or variable
rates. The fund may invest in U.S. banks, foreign branches of U.S. banks,
U.S. branches of foreign banks, and foreign branches of foreign banks.
. Short-Term Corporate Debt Securities Short-term corporate debt securities
rated at least AA by S&P, Moody's or Fitch.
. Commercial Paper Paper rated A-2 or better by S&P, Prime-2 or better by
Moody's, or F-2 or better by Fitch, or, if not rated, is issued by a
corporation having an outstanding debt issue rated A or better by Moody's,
S&P or Fitch and, with respect to the Money Funds, is of equivalent
investment quality as determined by the Board of Directors/Trustees.
. Determination of Maturity of Money Market Securities The Money Funds may
only purchase securities which at the time of investment have remaining
maturities of 397 calendar days or less. The other funds may also purchase
money market securities. In determining the maturity of money market
securities, funds will follow the provisions of Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act.
Tax-Efficient Funds
Hybrid Instruments
Hybrid Instruments (a type of potentially high-risk derivative) have been
developed and combine the elements of futures contracts or options with those
of debt, preferred equity, or a depository instrument (hereinafter "Hybrid
Instruments"). Generally, a Hybrid Instrument will be a debt security,
preferred stock, depository share, trust certificate, certificate of deposit,
or other evidence of indebtedness on which a portion of or all interest
payments, and/or the principal or stated amount payable at maturity,
redemption, or retirement, is determined by reference to prices, changes in
prices, or differences between prices, of securities, currencies,
intangibles, goods, articles, or commodities (collectively "Underlying
Assets") or by another objective index, economic factor, or other measure,
such as interest rates, currency exchange rates, commodity indices, and
securities indices (collectively "Benchmarks"). Thus, Hybrid Instruments may
take a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, debt instruments with
interest or principal payments or redemption terms determined by reference to
the value of a currency or commodity or securities index at a future point in
time, preferred stock with dividend rates determined by reference to the
value of a currency, or convertible securities with the conversion terms
related to a particular commodity.
Hybrid Instruments can be an efficient means of creating exposure to a
particular market, or segment of a market, with the objective of enhancing
total return. For example, a fund may wish to take advantage of expected
declines in interest rates in several European countries, but avoid the
transaction costs associated with buying and currency-hedging the foreign
bond positions. One solution would be to purchase a U.S. dollar-denominated
Hybrid Instrument whose redemption price is linked to the average three-year
interest rate in a designated group of countries. The redemption price
formula would provide for payoffs of greater than par if the average interest
rate was lower than a specified level, and payoffs of less than par if rates
were above the specified level. Furthermore, the fund could limit the
downside risk of the security by establishing a minimum redemption price so
that the principal paid at maturity could not be below a predetermined
minimum level if interest rates were to rise significantly. The purpose of
this arrangement, known as a structured security with an embedded put option,
would be to give the fund the desired European bond exposure while avoiding
currency risk, limiting downside market risk, and lowering transactions
costs. Of course, there is no guarantee that the strategy will be successful,
and the fund could lose money if, for example, interest rates do not move as
anticipated or credit problems develop with the issuer of the Hybrid
Instruments.
24
<PAGE>
The risks of investing in Hybrid Instruments reflect a combination of the
risks of investing in securities, options, futures, and currencies. Thus, an
investment in a Hybrid Instrument may entail significant risks that are not
associated with a similar investment in a traditional debt instrument that
has a fixed principal amount, is denominated in U.S. dollars, or bears
interest either at a fixed rate or a floating rate determined by reference to
a common, nationally published benchmark. The risks of a particular Hybrid
Instrument will, of course, depend upon the terms of the instrument, but may
include, without limitation, the possibility of significant changes in the
Benchmarks or the prices of Underlying Assets to which the instrument is
linked. Such risks generally depend upon factors which are unrelated to the
operations or credit quality of the issuer of the Hybrid Instrument and which
may not be readily foreseen by the purchaser, such as economic and political
events, the supply and demand for the Underlying Assets, and interest rate
movements. In recent years, various Benchmarks and prices for Underlying
Assets have been highly volatile, and such volatility may be expected in the
future. Reference is also made to the discussion of futures, options, and
forward contracts herein for a discussion of the risks associated with such
investments.
Hybrid Instruments are potentially more volatile and carry greater market
risks than traditional debt instruments. Depending on the structure of the
particular Hybrid Instrument, changes in a Benchmark may be magnified by the
terms of the Hybrid Instrument and have an even more dramatic and substantial
effect upon the value of the Hybrid Instrument. Also, the prices of the
Hybrid Instrument and the Benchmark or Underlying Asset may not move in the
same direction or at the same time.
Hybrid Instruments may bear interest or pay preferred dividends at below
market (or even relatively nominal) rates. Alternatively, Hybrid Instruments
may bear interest at above market rates but bear an increased risk of
principal loss (or gain). The latter scenario may result if "leverage" is
used to structure the Hybrid Instrument. Leverage risk occurs when the Hybrid
Instrument is structured so that a given change in a Benchmark or Underlying
Asset is multiplied to produce a greater value change in the Hybrid
Instrument, thereby magnifying the risk of loss as well as the potential for
gain.
Hybrid Instruments may also carry liquidity risk since the instruments are
often "customized" to meet the portfolio needs of a particular investor, and
therefore, the number of investors that are willing and able to buy such
instruments in the secondary market may be smaller than that for more
traditional debt securities. In addition, because the purchase and sale of
Hybrid Instruments could take place in an over-the-counter market without the
guarantee of a central clearing organization or in a transaction between the
fund and the issuer of the Hybrid Instrument, the creditworthiness of the
counterparty or issuer of the Hybrid Instrument would be an additional risk
factor which the fund would have to consider and monitor. Hybrid Instruments
also may not be subject to regulation of the Commodities Futures Trading
Commission ("CFTC"), which generally regulates the trading of commodity
futures by U.S. persons, the SEC, which regulates the offer and sale of
securities by and to U.S. persons, or any other governmental regulatory
authority.
The various risks discussed above, particularly the market risk of such
instruments, may in turn cause significant fluctuations in the net asset
value of the fund. Accordingly, the fund will limit its investments in Hybrid
Instruments to 10% of total assets. However, because of their volatility, it
is possible that the fund's investment in Hybrid Instruments will account for
more than 10% of the fund's return (positive or negative).
Illiquid or Restricted Securities
Restricted securities may be sold only in privately negotiated transactions
or in a public offering with respect to which a registration statement is in
effect under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"). Where registration
is required, the fund may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration
expenses, and a considerable period may elapse between the time of the
decision to sell and the time the fund may be permitted to sell a security
under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse
market conditions were to develop, the fund might obtain a less favorable
price than prevailed when it decided to sell. Restricted securities will be
priced at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures prescribed
by the fund's Board of Directors/Trustees. If, through the appreciation of
illiquid securities or the depreciation of liquid securities, the fund should
be in a position where more than 15% of the value of its net assets is
invested in illiquid assets, including restricted securities, the fund will
take appropriate steps to protect liquidity.
25
<PAGE>
Notwithstanding the above, the fund may purchase securities which, while
privately placed, are eligible for purchase and sale under Rule 144A under
the 1933 Act. This rule permits certain qualified institutional buyers, such
as the fund, to trade in privately placed securities even though such
securities are not registered under the 1933 Act. T. Rowe Price, under the
supervision of the fund's Board of Directors/Trustees, will consider whether
securities purchased under Rule 144A are illiquid and thus subject to the
fund's restriction of investing no more than 15% of its net assets in
illiquid securities. A determination of whether a Rule 144A security is
liquid or not is a question of fact. In making this determination, T. Rowe
Price will consider the trading markets for the specific security taking into
account the unregistered nature of a Rule 144A security. In addition, T. Rowe
Price could consider the following: (1) frequency of trades and quotes; (2)
number of dealers and potential purchases; (3) dealer undertakings to make a
market; and (4) the nature of the security and of marketplace trades (e.g.,
the time needed to dispose of the security, the method of soliciting offers,
and the mechanics of transfer). The liquidity of Rule 144A securities would
be monitored and, if as a result of changed conditions it is determined that
a Rule 144A security is no longer liquid, the fund's holdings of illiquid
securities would be reviewed to determine what, if any, steps are required to
assure that the fund does not invest more than 15% of its net assets in
illiquid securities. Investing in Rule 144A securities could have the effect
of increasing the amount of the fund's assets invested in illiquid securities
if qualified institutional buyers are unwilling to purchase such securities.
Warrants
The fund may acquire warrants. Warrants can be highly volatile and have no
voting rights, pay no dividends, and have no rights with respect to the
assets of the corporation issuing them. Warrants basically are options to
purchase securities at a specific price valid for a specific period of time.
They do not represent ownership of the securities, but only the right to buy
them. Warrants differ from call options in that warrants are issued by the
issuer of the security which may be purchased on their exercise, whereas call
options may be written or issued by anyone. The prices of warrants do not
necessarily move parallel to the prices of the underlying securities.
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All Funds (other than the Money Funds)
Futures Contracts
Futures contracts are a type of potentially high-risk derivative.
Transactions in Futures
The Bond funds may enter into futures contracts including interest rate
futures ("futures" or "futures contracts").
The Tax-Efficient Funds may enter into futures contracts including stock
index, interest rate, and currency futures ("futures" or "futures
contracts").
Stock index futures contracts may be used to provide a hedge for a portion of
the fund's portfolio, as a cash management tool, or as an efficient way for
T. Rowe Price to implement either an increase or decrease in portfolio market
exposure in response to changing market conditions. The fund may purchase or
sell futures contracts with respect to any stock index. Nevertheless, to
hedge the fund's portfolio successfully, the fund must sell futures contacts
with respect to indices or subindices whose movements will have a significant
correlation with movements in the prices of the fund's portfolio securities.
Interest rate or currency futures contracts may be used as a hedge against
changes in prevailing levels of interest rates or currency exchange rates in
order to establish more definitely the effective return on securities or
currencies held or intended to be acquired by the fund. In this regard, the
fund could sell interest rate or currency futures as an offset against the
effect of expected increases in interest rates or currency exchange rates
26
<PAGE>
and purchase such futures as an offset against the effect of expected
declines in interest rates or currency exchange rates.
The fund will enter into futures contracts which are traded on national (and
for the Tax-Efficient Funds, foreign) futures exchanges, and are standardized
as to maturity date and underlying financial instrument. Futures exchanges
and trading in the United States are regulated under the Commodity Exchange
Act by the CFTC. Although techniques other than the sale and purchase of
futures contracts could be used for the above-referenced purposes, futures
contracts offer an effective and relatively low cost means of implementing
the fund's objectives in these areas.
Regulatory Limitations
If the fund purchases or sells futures contracts or related options which do
not qualify as bona fide hedging under applicable CFTC rules, the aggregate
initial margin deposits and premium required to establish those positions
cannot exceed 5% of the liquidation value of the fund after taking into
account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such contracts it has
entered into; provided, however, that in the case of an option that is
in-the-money at the time of purchase, the in-the-money amount may be excluded
in calculating the 5% limitation. For purposes of this policy, options on
futures contracts and foreign currency options traded on a commodities
exchange will be considered "related options." This policy may be modified by
the Board of Directors/Trustees without a shareholder vote and does not limit
the percentage of the fund's assets at risk to 5%.
In instances involving the purchase of futures contracts or the writing of
call or put options thereon by the fund, an amount of cash, liquid assets, or
other suitable cover as permitted by the SEC, equal to the market value of
the futures contracts and options thereon (less any related margin deposits),
will be identified by the fund to cover the position, or alternative cover
(such as owning an offsetting position) will be employed. Assets used as
cover or held in an identified account cannot be sold while the position in
the corresponding option or future is open, unless they are replaced with
similar assets. As a result, the commitment of a large portion of a fund's
assets to cover or identified accounts could impede portfolio management or
the fund's ability to meet redemption requests or other current obligations.
If the CFTC or other regulatory authorities adopt different (including less
stringent) or additional restrictions, the fund would comply with such new
restrictions.
Trading in Futures Contracts
A futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and purchase by
another party of a specified amount of a specific financial instrument (e.g.,
units of a stock index) for a specified price, date, time, and place
designated at the time the contract is made. Brokerage fees are incurred when
a futures contract is bought or sold and margin deposits must be maintained.
Entering into a contract to buy is commonly referred to as buying or
purchasing a contract or holding a long position. Entering into a contract to
sell is commonly referred to as selling a contract or holding a short
position.
Unlike when the fund purchases or sells a security, no price would be paid or
received by the fund upon the purchase or sale of a futures contract. Upon
entering into a futures contract, and to maintain the fund's open positions
in futures contracts, the fund would be required to deposit with its
custodian in a segregated account in the name of the futures broker an amount
of cash, or liquid assets known as "initial margin." The margin required for
a particular futures contract is set by the exchange on which the contract is
traded, and may be significantly modified from time to time by the exchange
during the term of the contract. Futures contracts are customarily purchased
and sold on margins that may range upward from less than 5% of the value of
the contract being traded.
If the price of an open futures contract changes (by increase in the case of
a sale or by decrease in the case of a purchase) so that the loss on the
futures contract reaches a point at which the margin on deposit does not
satisfy margin requirements, the broker will require an increase in the
margin. However, if the value of a position increases because of favorable
price changes in the futures contract so that the margin deposit exceeds the
required margin, the broker will pay the excess to the fund.
27
<PAGE>
These subsequent payments, called "variation margin," to and from the futures
broker, are made on a daily basis as the price of the underlying assets
fluctuate, making the long and short positions in the futures contract more
or less valuable, a process known as "marking to market."
Although certain futures contracts, by their terms, require actual future
delivery of and payment for the underlying instruments, in practice most
futures contracts are usually closed out before the delivery date. Closing
out an open futures contract purchase or sale is effected by entering into an
offsetting futures contract sale or purchase, respectively, for the same
aggregate amount of the identical securities and the same delivery date. If
the offsetting purchase price is less than the original sale price, the fund
realizes a gain; if it is more, the fund realizes a loss. Conversely, if the
offsetting sale price is more than the original purchase price, the fund
realizes a gain; if it is less, the fund realizes a loss. The transaction
costs must also be included in these calculations. There can be no assurance,
however, that the fund will be able to enter into an offsetting transaction
with respect to a particular futures contract at a particular time. If the
fund is not able to enter into an offsetting transaction, the fund will
continue to be required to maintain the margin deposits on the futures
contract.
As an example of an offsetting transaction in which the underlying instrument
is not delivered, the contractual obligations arising from the sale of one
contract of September Treasury bills on an exchange may be fulfilled at any
time before delivery of the contract is required (i.e., on a specified date
in September, the "delivery month") by the purchase of one contract of
September Treasury bills on the same exchange. In such instance, the
difference between the price at which the futures contract was sold and the
price paid for the offsetting purchase, after allowance for transaction
costs, represents the profit or loss to the fund.
Tax-Efficient Funds
For example, the S&P's 500 Stock Index is made up of 500 selected common
stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The S&P 500
Index assigns relative weightings to the common stocks included in the Index,
and the Index fluctuates with changes in the market values of those common
stocks. In the case of futures contracts on the S&P 500 Index, the contracts
are to buy or sell 250 units. Thus, if the value of the S&P 500 Index were
$150, one contract would be worth $37,500 (250 units x $150). The stock index
futures contract specifies that no delivery of the actual stocks making up
the index will take place. Instead, settlement in cash occurs. Over the life
of the contract, the gain or loss realized by the fund will equal the
difference between the purchase (or sale) price of the contract and the price
at which the contract is terminated. For example, if the fund enters into a
futures contract to buy 250 units of the S&P 500 Index at a specified future
date at a contract price of $150 and the S&P 500 Index is at $154 on that
future date, the fund will gain $1,000 (250 units x gain of $4). If the fund
enters into a futures contract to sell 250 units of the stock index at a
specified future date at a contract price of $150 and the S&P 500 Index is at
$152 on that future date, the fund will lose $500 (250 units x loss of $2).
Special Risks of Transactions in Futures Contracts
. Volatility and Leverage The prices of futures contracts are volatile and are
influenced, among other things, by actual and anticipated changes in the
market and interest rates, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary
policies and national and international political and economic events.
Most United States futures exchanges limit the amount of fluctuation
permitted in futures contract prices during a single trading day. The daily
limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may
vary either up or down from the previous day's settlement price at the end of
a trading session. Once the daily limit has been reached in a particular type
of futures contract, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that
limit. The daily limit governs only price movement during a particular
trading day and therefore does not limit potential losses, because the limit
may prevent the liquidation of unfavorable positions. Futures contract prices
have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive trading
days with little or no trading, thereby preventing prompt liquidation of
futures positions and subjecting some futures traders to substantial losses.
Margin deposits required on futures trading are low. As a result, a
relatively small price movement in a futures contract may result in immediate
and substantial loss, as well as gain, to the investor. For example, if at
the
28
<PAGE>
time of purchase, 10% of the value of the futures contract is deposited as
margin, a subsequent 10% decrease in the value of the futures contract would
result in a total loss of the margin deposit, before any deduction for the
transaction costs, if the account were then closed out. A 15% decrease would
result in a loss equal to 150% of the original margin deposit, if the
contract were closed out. Thus, a purchase or sale of a futures contract may
result in losses in excess of the amount invested in the futures contract.
. Liquidity The fund may elect to close some or all of its futures positions
at any time prior to their expiration. The fund would do so to reduce
exposure represented by long futures positions or short futures positions.
The fund may close its positions by taking opposite positions which would
operate to terminate the fund's position in the futures contracts. Final
determinations of variation margin would then be made, additional cash would
be required to be paid by or released to the fund, and the fund would realize
a loss or a gain.
Futures contracts may be closed out only on the exchange or board of trade
where the contracts were initially traded. Although the fund intends to
purchase or sell futures contracts only on exchanges or boards of trade where
there appears to be an active market, there is no assurance that a liquid
market on an exchange or board of trade will exist for any particular
contract at any particular time. In such event, it might not be possible to
close a futures contract, and in the event of adverse price movements, the
fund would continue to be required to make daily cash payments of variation
margin. However, in the event futures contracts have been used to hedge the
underlying instruments, the fund would continue to hold the underlying
instruments subject to the hedge until the futures contracts could be
terminated. In such circumstances, an increase in the price of underlying
instruments, if any, might partially or completely offset losses on the
futures contract. However, as described next, there is no guarantee that the
price of the underlying instruments will, in fact, correlate with the price
movements in the futures contract and thus provide an offset to losses on a
futures contract.
. Hedging Risk A decision of whether, when, and how to hedge involves skill
and judgment, and even a well-conceived hedge may be unsuccessful to some
degree because of unexpected market behavior, market or interest rate trends.
There are several risks in connection with the use by the fund of futures
contracts as a hedging device. One risk arises because of the imperfect
correlation between movements in the prices of the futures contracts and
movements in the prices of the underlying instruments which are the subject
of the hedge. T. Rowe Price will, however, attempt to reduce this risk by
entering into futures contracts whose movements, in its judgment, will have a
significant correlation with movements in the prices of the fund's underlying
instruments sought to be hedged.
Successful use of futures contracts by the fund for hedging purposes is also
subject to T. Rowe Price's ability to correctly predict movements in the
direction of the market. It is possible that, when the fund has sold futures
to hedge its portfolio against a decline in the market, the index, indices,
or instruments underlying futures might advance and the value of the
underlying instruments held in the fund's portfolio might decline. If this
were to occur, the fund would lose money on the futures and also would
experience a decline in value in its underlying instruments. However, while
this might occur to a certain degree, T. Rowe Price believes that over time
the value of the fund's portfolio will tend to move in the same direction as
the market indices used to hedge the portfolio. It is also possible that, if
the fund were to hedge against the possibility of a decline in the market
(adversely affecting the underlying instruments held in its portfolio) and
prices instead increased, the fund would lose part or all of the benefit of
increased value of those underlying instruments that it has hedged, because
it would have offsetting losses in its futures positions. In addition, in
such situations, if the fund had insufficient cash, it might have to sell
underlying instruments to meet daily variation margin requirements. Such
sales of underlying instruments might be, but would not necessarily be, at
increased prices (which would reflect the rising market). The fund might have
to sell underlying instruments at a time when it would be disadvantageous to
do so.
In addition to the possibility that there might be an imperfect correlation,
or no correlation at all, between price movements in the futures contracts
and the portion of the portfolio being hedged, the price movements of futures
contracts might not correlate perfectly with price movements in the
underlying instruments due to certain market distortions. First, all
participants in the futures market are subject to margin deposit and
maintenance requirements. Rather than meeting additional margin deposit
requirements, investors might close
29
<PAGE>
futures contracts through offsetting transactions, which could distort the
normal relationship between the underlying instruments and futures markets.
Second, the margin requirements in the futures market are less onerous than
margin requirements in the securities markets and, as a result, the futures
market might attract more speculators than the securities markets do.
Increased participation by speculators in the futures market might also cause
temporary price distortions. Due to the possibility of price distortion in
the futures market and also because of imperfect correlation between price
movements in the underlying instruments and movements in the prices of
futures contracts, even a correct forecast of general market trends by T.
Rowe Price might not result in a successful hedging transaction over a very
short time period.
All Funds (other than the Money Funds)
The fund may purchase and sell options on the same types of futures in which
it may invest.
Options on Futures Contracts
Bond and Tax-Efficient Balanced Funds
The fund might trade in municipal bond index option futures or similar
options on futures developed in the future. In addition, the fund may also
trade in options on futures contracts on U.S. government securities and any
U.S. government securities futures index contract which might be developed.
In the opinion of T. Rowe Price, there is a high degree of correlation in the
interest rate, and price movements of U.S. government securities and
municipal securities. However, the U.S. government securities market and
municipal securities markets are independent and may not move in tandem at
any point in time.
The fund may purchase put options on futures contracts to hedge its portfolio
of municipal securities against the risk of rising interest rates, and the
consequent decline in the prices of the municipal securities it owns. The
funds will also write call options on futures contracts as a hedge against a
modest decline in prices of the municipal securities held in the fund's
portfolio. If the futures price at expiration of a written call option is
below the exercise price, the fund will retain the full amount of the option
premium, thereby partially hedging against any decline that may have occurred
in the fund's holdings of debt securities. If the futures price when the
option is exercised is above the exercise price, however, the fund will incur
a loss, which may be wholly or partially offset by the increase of the value
of the securities in the fund's portfolio which were being hedged.
Tax-Efficient Funds
The fund may purchase and sell options on the same types of futures in which
it may invest.
All Funds (other than the Money Funds)
Writing a put option on a futures contract serves as a partial hedge against
an increase in the value of securities the fund intends to acquire. If the
futures price at expiration of the option is above the exercise price, the
fund will retain the full amount of the option premium which provides a
partial hedge against any increase that may have occurred in the price of the
debt securities the fund intends to acquire. If the futures price when the
option is exercised is below the exercise price, however, the fund will incur
a loss, which may be wholly or partially offset by the decrease in the price
of the securities the fund intends to acquire.
Options (another type of potentially high-risk derivative) on futures are
similar to options on underlying instruments except that options on futures
give the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a
position in a futures contract (a long position if the option is a call and a
short position if the option is a put), rather than to purchase or sell the
futures contract, at a specified exercise price at any time during the period
of the option. Upon exercise of the option, the delivery of the futures
position by the writer of the option to the holder of the option will be
accompanied by the delivery of the accumulated balance in the writer's
futures margin account which represents the amount by which the market price
of the futures contract, at exercise, exceeds (in the case of a call) or is
less than (in the case of a put) the exercise price of the option on the
futures contract. Purchasers of options who fail to exercise their options
prior to the exercise date suffer a loss of the premium paid.
30
<PAGE>
From time to time a single order to purchase or sell futures contracts (or
options thereon) may be made on behalf of the fund and other T. Rowe Price
funds. Such aggregated orders would be allocated among the fund and the other
T. Rowe Price funds in a fair and non-discriminatory manner.
Tax-Efficient Funds
As an alternative to writing or purchasing call and put options on stock
index futures, the fund may write or purchase call and put options on stock
indices. Such options would be used in a manner similar to the use of options
on futures contracts.
Special Risks of Transactions in Options on Futures Contracts
The risks described under "Special Risks in Transactions on Futures
Contracts" are substantially the same as the risks of using options on
futures. If the fund were to write an option on a futures contract, it would
be required to deposit and maintain initial and variation margin in the same
manner as a regular futures contract. In addition, where the fund seeks to
close out an option position by writing or buying an offsetting option
covering the same index, underlying instrument or contract and having the
same exercise price and expiration date, its ability to establish and close
out positions on such options will be subject to the maintenance of a liquid
secondary market. Reasons for the absence of a liquid secondary market on an
exchange include the following: (1) there may be insufficient trading
interest in certain options; (2) restrictions may be imposed by an exchange
on opening transactions or closing transactions or both; (3) trading halts,
suspensions, or other restrictions may be imposed with respect to particular
classes or series of options, or underlying instruments; (4) unusual or
unforeseen circumstances may interrupt normal operations on an exchange; (5)
the facilities of an exchange or a clearing corporation may not at all times
be adequate to handle current trading volume; or (6) one or more exchanges
could, for economic or other reasons, decide or be compelled at some future
date to discontinue the trading of options (or a particular class or series
of options), in which event the secondary market on that exchange (or in the
class or series of options) would cease to exist, although outstanding
options on the exchange that had been issued by a clearing corporation as a
result of trades on that exchange would continue to be exercisable in
accordance with their terms. There is no assurance that higher than
anticipated trading activity or other unforeseen events might not, at times,
render certain of the facilities of any of the clearing corporations
inadequate, and thereby result in the institution by an exchange of special
procedures which may interfere with the timely execution of customers'
orders.
In addition, the correlation between movements in the price of options on
futures contracts and movements in the price of the securities hedged can
only be approximate. This risk is significantly increased when an option on a
U.S. government securities future or an option on some type of index future
is used as a proxy for hedging a portfolio consisting of other types of
securities. Another risk is that the movements in the price of options on
futures contract and the value of the call increases by more than the
increase in the value of the securities held as cover, the fund may realize a
loss on the call which is not completely offset by the appreciation in the
price of the securities held as cover and the premium received for writing
the call.
The successful use of options on futures contracts requires special expertise
and techniques different from those involved in portfolio securities
transactions. A decision of whether, when and how to hedge involves skill and
judgment, and even a well-conceived hedge may be unsuccessful to some degree
because of unexpected market behavior or interest rate trends. During periods
when municipal securities market prices are appreciating, the fund may
experience poorer overall performance than if it had not entered into any
options on futures contracts.
General Considerations Transactions by the fund in options on futures will be
subject to limitations established by each of the exchanges, boards of trade
or other trading facilities governing the maximum number of options in each
class which may be written or purchased by a single investor or group of
investors acting in concert, regardless of whether the options are written on
the same or different exchanges, boards of trade or other trading facilities
or are held or written in one or more accounts or through one or more
brokers. Thus, the number of contracts which the fund may write or purchase
may be affected by contracts written or purchased by other investment
advisory clients of T. Rowe Price. An exchange, board of trade or other
trading
31
<PAGE>
facility may order the liquidations of positions found to be in excess of
these limits, and it may impose certain other sanctions.
Additional Futures and Options Contracts
Although the fund has no current intention of engaging in futures or options
transactions other than those described above, it reserves the right to do
so. Such futures and options trading might involve risks which differ from
those involved in the futures and options described above.
Federal Tax Treatment of Options, Futures Contracts, and Forward Foreign
Exchange Contracts
Although the fund invests almost exclusively in securities that generate
income that is exempt from federal income taxes, the fund may enter into
certain option, futures, and foreign exchange contracts, including options
and futures on currencies, which will be treated as Section 1256 contracts or
straddles that are not exempt from such taxes. Therefore, use of the
investment techniques described above could result in taxable income to
shareholders of the fund.
Transactions which are considered Section 1256 contracts will be considered
to have been closed at the end of the fund's fiscal year and any gains or
losses will be recognized for tax purposes at that time. Gains or losses
recognized from the normal closing or settlement of such transactions will be
characterized as 60% long-term capital gain or loss and 40% short-term
capital gain or loss, without regard to the holding period of the contract.
The fund will be required to distribute net gains on such transactions to
shareholders even though it may not have closed the transaction and received
cash to pay such distributions.
Options, futures, and forward foreign exchange contracts, including options
and futures on currencies, which offset a foreign dollar-denominated bond or
currency position may be considered straddles for tax purposes, in which case
a loss on any position in a straddle will be subject to deferral to the
extent of unrealized gain in an offsetting position. The holding period of
the securities or currencies comprising the straddle will be deemed not to
begin until the straddle is terminated. The holding period of the security
offsetting an "in-the-money qualified covered call" option on an equity
security will not include the period of time the option is outstanding.
Losses on written covered calls and purchased puts on securities, excluding
certain "qualified covered call" options on equity securities, may be
long-term capital losses, if the security covering the option was held for
more than 12 months prior to the writing of the option.
In order for the fund to continue to qualify for federal income tax treatment
as a regulated investment company, at least 90% of its gross income for a
taxable year must be derived from qualifying income, i.e., dividends,
interest, income derived from loans of securities, and gains from the sale of
securities or currencies. Tax regulations could be issued limiting the extent
that net gain realized from option, futures, or foreign forward exchange
contracts on currencies is qualifying income for purposes of the 90%
requirement.
As a result of the "Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997," entering into certain
options, futures contracts, or forward contracts may result in the
"constructive sale" of offsetting stocks or debt securities of the fund.
Options on Securities
Options are another type of potentially high-risk derivative.
Bond and Money Funds
The funds have no current intention of investing in options on securities,
although they reserve the right to do so. Appropriate disclosure would be
added to the funds' prospectus and Statement of Additional Information when
and if the funds decide to invest in options.
Tax-Efficient Funds
Writing Covered Call Options
The fund may write (sell) American or European style "covered" call options
and purchase options to close out options previously written by the fund. In
writing covered call options, the fund expects to generate additional
32
<PAGE>
premium income which should serve to enhance the fund's total return and
reduce the effect of any price decline of the security or currency involved
in the option. Covered call options will generally be written on securities
or currencies which, in T. Rowe Price's opinion, are not expected to have any
major price increases or moves in the near future but which, over the long
term, are deemed to be attractive investments for the fund.
A call option gives the holder (buyer) the "right to purchase," and the
writer (seller) has the "obligation to sell," a security or currency at a
specified price (the exercise price) at expiration of the option (European
style) or at any time until a certain date (the expiration date) (American
style). So long as the obligation of the writer of a call option continues,
he may be assigned an exercise notice by the broker-dealer through whom such
option was sold, requiring him to deliver the underlying security or currency
against payment of the exercise price. This obligation terminates upon the
expiration of the call option, or such earlier time at which the writer
effects a closing purchase transaction by repurchasing an option identical to
that previously sold. To secure his obligation to deliver the underlying
security or currency in the case of a call option, a writer is required to
deposit in escrow the underlying security or currency or other assets in
accordance with the rules of a clearing corporation.
The fund generally will write only covered call options. This means that the
fund will either own the security or currency subject to the option or an
option to purchase the same underlying security or currency, having an
exercise price equal to or less than the exercise price of the "covered"
option. From time to time, the fund will write a call option that is not
covered as indicated above but where the fund will establish and maintain
with its custodian for the term of the option, an account consisting of cash,
U.S. government securities, other liquid high-grade debt obligations, or
other suitable cover as permitted by the SEC having a value equal to the
fluctuating market value of the optioned securities or currencies. While such
an option would be "covered" with sufficient collateral to satisfy SEC
prohibitions on issuing senior securities, this type of strategy would expose
the fund to the risks of writing uncovered options.
Portfolio securities or currencies on which call options may be written will
be purchased solely on the basis of investment considerations consistent with
the fund's investment objective. The writing of covered call options is a
conservative investment technique believed to involve relatively little risk
(in contrast to the writing of naked or uncovered options, which the fund
generally will not do), but capable of enhancing the fund's total return.
When writing a covered call option, a fund, in return for the premium, gives
up the opportunity for profit from a price increase in the underlying
security or currency above the exercise price, but conversely retains the
risk of loss should the price of the security or currency decline. Unlike one
who owns securities or currencies not subject to an option, the fund has no
control over when it may be required to sell the underlying securities or
currencies, since it may be assigned an exercise notice at any time prior to
the expiration of its obligation as a writer. If a call option which the fund
has written expires, the fund will realize a gain in the amount of the
premium; however, such gain may be offset by a decline in the market value of
the underlying security or currency during the option period. If the call
option is exercised, the fund will realize a gain or loss from the sale of
the underlying security or currency. The fund does not consider a security or
currency covered by a call to be "pledged" as that term is used in the fund's
policy which limits the pledging or mortgaging of its assets. If the fund
writes an uncovered option as described above, it will bear the risk of
having to purchase the security subject to the option at a price higher than
the exercise price of the option. As the price of a security could appreciate
substantially, the fund's loss could be significant.
The premium received is the market value of an option. The premium the fund
will receive from writing a call option will reflect, among other things, the
current market price of the underlying security or currency, the relationship
of the exercise price to such market price, the historical price volatility
of the underlying security or currency, and the length of the option period.
Once the decision to write a call option has been made, T. Rowe Price, in
determining whether a particular call option should be written on a
particular security or currency, will consider the reasonableness of the
anticipated premium and the likelihood that a liquid secondary market will
exist for those options. The premium received by the fund for writing covered
call options will be recorded as a liability of the fund. This liability will
be adjusted daily to the option's current market value, which will be the
latest sale price at the time at which the net asset value per share of the
fund is computed (close of the New York Stock Exchange), or, in the absence
of such sale, the latest asked price. The
33
<PAGE>
option will be terminated upon expiration of the option, the purchase of an
identical option in a closing transaction, or delivery of the underlying
security or currency upon the exercise of the option.
Closing transactions will be effected in order to realize a profit on an
outstanding call option, to prevent an underlying security or currency from
being called, or to permit the sale of the underlying security or currency.
Furthermore, effecting a closing transaction will permit the fund to write
another call option on the underlying security or currency with either a
different exercise price or expiration date or both. If the fund desires to
sell a particular security or currency from its portfolio on which it has
written a call option, or purchased a put option, it will seek to effect a
closing transaction prior to, or concurrently with, the sale of the security
or currency. There is, of course, no assurance that the fund will be able to
effect such closing transactions at favorable prices. If the fund cannot
enter into such a transaction, it may be required to hold a security or
currency that it might otherwise have sold. When the fund writes a covered
call option, it runs the risk of not being able to participate in the
appreciation of the underlying securities or currencies above the exercise
price, as well as the risk of being required to hold on to securities or
currencies that are depreciating in value. This could result in higher
transaction costs. The fund will pay transaction costs in connection with the
writing of options to close out previously written options. Such transaction
costs are normally higher than those applicable to purchases and sales of
portfolio securities.
Call options written by the fund will normally have expiration dates of less
than nine months from the date written. The exercise price of the options may
be below, equal to, or above the current market values of the underlying
securities or currencies at the time the options are written. From time to
time, the fund may purchase an underlying security or currency for delivery
in accordance with an exercise notice of a call option assigned to it, rather
than delivering such security or currency from its portfolio. In such cases,
additional costs may be incurred.
The fund will realize a profit or loss from a closing purchase transaction if
the cost of the transaction is less or more than the premium received from
the writing of the option. Because increases in the market price of a call
option will generally reflect increases in the market price of the underlying
security or currency, any loss resulting from the repurchase of a call option
is likely to be offset in whole or in part by appreciation of the underlying
security or currency owned by the fund.
The fund will not write a covered call option if, as a result, the aggregate
market value of all portfolio securities or currencies covering written call
or put options exceeds 25% of the market value of the fund's net assets. In
calculating the 25% limit, the fund will offset, against the value of assets
covering written calls and puts, the value of purchased calls and puts on
identical securities or currencies with identical maturity dates.
Writing Covered Put Options
The fund may write American or European style covered put options and
purchase options to close out options previously written by the fund. A put
option gives the purchaser of the option the right to sell, and the writer
(seller) has the obligation to buy, the underlying security or currency at
the exercise price during the option period (American style) or at the
expiration of the option (European style). So long as the obligation of the
writer continues, he may be assigned an exercise notice by the broker-dealer
through whom such option was sold, requiring him to make payment to the
exercise price against delivery of the underlying security or currency. The
operation of put options in other respects, including their related risks and
rewards, is substantially identical to that of call options.
The fund would write put options only on a covered basis, which means that
the fund would maintain in a segregated account cash, U.S. government
securities, other liquid high-grade debt obligations, or other suitable cover
as determined by the SEC, in an amount not less than the exercise price or
the fund will own an option to sell the underlying security or currency
subject to the option having an exercise price equal to or greater than the
exercise price of the "covered" option at all times while the put option is
outstanding. (The rules of a clearing corporation currently require that such
assets be deposited in escrow to secure payment of the exercise price.)
The fund would generally write covered put options in circumstances where T.
Rowe Price wishes to purchase the underlying security or currency for the
fund's portfolio at a price lower than the current market price of
34
<PAGE>
the security or currency. In such event the fund would write a put option at
an exercise price which, reduced by the premium received on the option,
reflects the lower price it is willing to pay. Since the fund would also
receive interest on debt securities or currencies maintained to cover the
exercise price of the option, this technique could be used to enhance current
return during periods of market uncertainty. The risk in such a transaction
would be that the market price of the underlying security or currency would
decline below the exercise price less the premiums received. Such a decline
could be substantial and result in a significant loss to the fund. In
addition, the fund, because it does not own the specific securities or
currencies which it may be required to purchase in exercise of the put,
cannot benefit from appreciation, if any, with respect to such specific
securities or currencies.
The fund will not write a covered put option if, as a result, the aggregate
market value of all portfolio securities or currencies covering put or call
options exceeds 25% of the market value of the fund's net assets. In
calculating the 25% limit, the fund will offset, against the value of assets
covering written puts and calls, the value of purchased puts and calls on
identical securities or currencies with identical maturity dates.
Purchasing Put Options
The fund may purchase American or European style put options. As the holder
of a put option, the fund has the right to sell the underlying security or
currency at the exercise price at any time during the option period (American
style) or at the expiration of the option (European style). The fund may
enter into closing sale transactions with respect to such options, exercise
them or permit them to expire. The fund may purchase put options for
defensive purposes in order to protect against an anticipated decline in the
value of its securities or currencies. An example of such use of put options
is provided next.
The fund may purchase a put option on an underlying security or currency (a
"protective put") owned by the fund as a defensive technique in order to
protect against an anticipated decline in the value of the security or
currency. Such hedge protection is provided only during the life of the put
option when the fund, as the holder of the put option, is able to sell the
underlying security or currency at the put exercise price regardless of any
decline in the underlying security's market price or currency's exchange
value. For example, a put option may be purchased in order to protect
unrealized appreciation of a security or currency where T. Rowe Price deems
it desirable to continue to hold the security or currency because of tax
considerations. The premium paid for the put option and any transaction costs
would reduce any capital gain otherwise available for distribution when the
security or currency is eventually sold.
The fund may also purchase put options at a time when the fund does not own
the underlying security or currency. By purchasing put options on a security
or currency it does not own, the fund seeks to benefit from a decline in the
market price of the underlying security or currency. If the put option is not
sold when it has remaining value, and if the market price of the underlying
security or currency remains equal to or greater than the exercise price
during the life of the put option, the fund will lose its entire investment
in the put option. In order for the purchase of a put option to be
profitable, the market price of the underlying security or currency must
decline sufficiently below the exercise price to cover the premium and
transaction costs, unless the put option is sold in a closing sale
transaction.
The fund will not commit more than 5% of its assets to premiums when
purchasing put and call options. The premium paid by the fund when purchasing
a put option will be recorded as an asset of the fund. This asset will be
adjusted daily to the option's current market value, which will be the latest
sale price at the time at which the net asset value per share of the fund is
computed (close of New York Stock Exchange), or, in the absence of such sale,
the latest bid price. This asset will be terminated upon expiration of the
option, the selling (writing) of an identical option in a closing
transaction, or the delivery of the underlying security or currency upon the
exercise of the option.
Purchasing Call Options
The fund may purchase American or European style call options. As the holder
of a call option, the fund has the right to purchase the underlying security
or currency at the exercise price at any time during the option period
(American style) or at the expiration of the option (European style). The
fund may enter into closing sale transactions with respect to such options,
exercise them or permit them to expire. The fund may purchase
35
<PAGE>
call options for the purpose of increasing its current return or avoiding tax
consequences which could reduce its current return. The fund may also
purchase call options in order to acquire the underlying securities or
currencies. Examples of such uses of call options are provided next.
Call options may be purchased by the fund for the purpose of acquiring the
underlying securities or currencies for its portfolio. Utilized in this
fashion, the purchase of call options enables the fund to acquire the
securities or currencies at the exercise price of the call option plus the
premium paid. At times the net cost of acquiring securities or currencies in
this manner may be less than the cost of acquiring the securities or
currencies directly. This technique may also be useful to the fund in
purchasing a large block of securities or currencies that would be more
difficult to acquire by direct market purchases. So long as it holds such a
call option rather than the underlying security or currency itself, the fund
is partially protected from any unexpected decline in the market price of the
underlying security or currency and in such event could allow the call option
to expire, incurring a loss only to the extent of the premium paid for the
option.
The fund will not commit more than 5% of its assets to premiums when
purchasing call and put options. The fund may also purchase call options on
underlying securities or currencies it owns in order to protect unrealized
gains on call options previously written by it. A call option would be
purchased for this purpose where tax considerations make it inadvisable to
realize such gains through a closing purchase transaction. Call options may
also be purchased at times to avoid realizing losses.
Dealer (Over-the-Counter) Options
The fund may engage in transactions involving dealer options. Certain risks
are specific to dealer options. While the fund would look to a clearing
corporation to exercise exchange-traded options, if the fund were to purchase
a dealer option, it would rely on the dealer from whom it purchased the
option to perform if the option were exercised. Failure by the dealer to do
so would result in the loss of the premium paid by the fund as well as loss
of the expected benefit of the transaction.
Exchange-traded options generally have a continuous liquid market while
dealer options have none. Consequently, the fund will generally be able to
realize the value of a dealer option it has purchased only by exercising it
or reselling it to the dealer who issued it. Similarly, when the fund writes
a dealer option, it generally will be able to close out the option prior to
its expiration only by entering into a closing purchase transaction with the
dealer to which the fund originally wrote the option. While the fund will
seek to enter into dealer options only with dealers who will agree to and
which are expected to be capable of entering into closing transactions with
the fund, there can be no assurance that the fund will be able to liquidate a
dealer option at a favorable price at any time prior to expiration. Until the
fund, as a covered dealer call option writer, is able to effect a closing
purchase transaction, it will not be able to liquidate securities (or other
assets) or currencies used as cover until the option expires or is exercised.
In the event of insolvency of the contra party, the fund may be unable to
liquidate a dealer option. With respect to options written by the fund, the
inability to enter into a closing transaction may result in material losses
to the fund. For example, since the fund must maintain a secured position
with respect to any call option on a security it writes, the fund may not
sell the assets which it has segregated to secure the position while it is
obligated under the option. This requirement may impair a fund's ability to
sell portfolio securities or currencies at a time when such sale might be
advantageous.
The Staff of the SEC has taken the position that purchased dealer options and
the assets used to secure the written dealer options are illiquid securities.
The fund may treat the cover used for written Over-the-Counter ("OTC")
options as liquid if the dealer agrees that the fund may repurchase the OTC
option it has written for a maximum price to be calculated by a predetermined
formula. In such cases, the OTC option would be considered illiquid only to
the extent the maximum repurchase price under the formula exceeds the
intrinsic value of the option.
Lending of Portfolio Securities
Securities loans are made to broker-dealers, institutional investors, or
other persons, pursuant to agreements requiring that the loans be
continuously secured by collateral at least equal at all times to the value
of the securities lent, marked to market on a daily basis. The collateral
received will consist of cash, U.S. government
36
<PAGE>
securities, letters of credit, or such other collateral as may be permitted
under its investment program. While the securities are being lent, the fund
will continue to receive the equivalent of the interest or dividends paid by
the issuer on the securities, as well as interest on the investment of the
collateral or a fee from the borrower. The fund has a right to call each loan
and obtain the securities, within such period of time which coincides with
the normal settlement period for purchases and sales of such securities in
the respective markets. The fund will not have the right to vote on
securities while they are being lent, but it will call a loan in anticipation
of any important vote. The risks in lending portfolio securities, as with
other extensions of secured credit, consist of possible delay in receiving
additional collateral or in the recovery of the securities or possible loss
of rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially. Loans will
only be made to firms deemed by T. Rowe Price to be of good standing and will
not be made unless, in the judgment of T. Rowe Price, the consideration to be
earned from such loans would justify the risk.
Repurchase Agreements
The fund may enter into a repurchase agreement through which an investor
(such as the fund) purchases a security (known as the "underlying security")
from a well-established securities dealer or a bank that is a member of the
Federal Reserve System. Any such dealer or bank will be on T. Rowe Price's
approved list and have a credit rating with respect to its short-term debt of
at least A1 by S&P, P1 by Moody's, or the equivalent rating by T. Rowe Price.
At that time, the bank or securities dealer agrees to repurchase the
underlying security at the same price, plus specified interest. Repurchase
agreements are generally for a short period of time, often less than a week.
Repurchase agreements which do not provide for payment within seven days will
be treated as illiquid securities. The fund will only enter into repurchase
agreements where (1) the underlying securities are of the type (excluding
maturity limitations) which the fund's investment guidelines would allow it
to purchase directly, (2) the market value of the underlying security,
including interest accrued, will be at all times equal to or exceed the value
of the repurchase agreement, and (3) payment for the underlying security is
made only upon physical delivery or evidence of book-entry transfer to the
account of the custodian or a bank acting as agent. In the event of a
bankruptcy or other default of a seller of a repurchase agreement, the fund
could experience both delays in liquidating the underlying security and
losses, including: (a) possible decline in the value of the underlying
security during the period while the fund seeks to enforce its rights
thereto; (b) possible subnormal levels of income and lack of access to income
during this period; and (c) expenses of enforcing its rights.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements
Although the fund has no current intention of engaging in reverse repurchase
agreements, the fund reserves the right to do so. Reverse repurchase
agreements are ordinary repurchase agreements in which a fund is the seller
of, rather than the investor in, securities, and agrees to repurchase them at
an agreed upon time and price. Use of a reverse repurchase agreement may be
preferable to a regular sale and later repurchase of the securities because
it avoids certain market risks and transaction costs. A reverse repurchase
agreement may be viewed as a type of borrowing by the fund, subject to
Investment Restriction (1). (See "Investment Restrictions.")
All Funds
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fundamental policies may not be changed without the approval of the lesser of
(1) 67% of the fund's shares present at a meeting of shareholders if the
holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares are present in person or
by proxy or (2) more than 50% of a fund's outstanding shares. Other
restrictions in the form of operating policies are subject to change by the
fund's Board of Directors/Trustees without shareholder approval. Any
investment restriction which involves a maximum percentage of securities or
assets shall not be considered to be violated unless an excess over the
percentage occurs immediately after, and is caused by, an acquisition of
securities or assets of, or borrowings by, the fund. Calculation of the
fund's total assets for compliance with any of the following fundamental or
operating policies or any other investment restrictions
37
<PAGE>
set forth in the fund's prospectus or Statement of Additional Information
will not include cash collateral held in connection with securities lending
activities.
Fundamental Policies
As a matter of fundamental policy, the fund may not:
(1) Borrowing Borrow money except that the fund may (i) borrow for
non-leveraging, temporary, or emergency purposes; and (ii) engage in
reverse repurchase agreements and make other investments or engage in
other transactions, which may involve a borrowing, in a manner consistent
with the fund's investment objective and program, provided that the
combination of (i) and (ii) shall not exceed 33/1//\\/3/\\% of the value
of the fund's total assets (including the amount borrowed) less
liabilities (other than borrowings) or such other percentage permitted by
law. Any borrowings which come to exceed this amount will be reduced in
accordance with applicable law. The fund may borrow from banks, other
Price Funds, or other persons to the extent permitted by applicable law;
(2) Commodities Purchase or sell physical commodities; except that the fund
(other than the Money Funds) may enter into futures contracts and options
thereon;
(3) Industry Concentration Purchase the securities of any issuer if, as a
result, more than 25% of the value of the fund's total assets would be
invested in the securities of issuers having their principal business
activities in the same industry;
(4) Loans Make loans, although the fund may (i) lend portfolio securities and
participate in an interfund lending program with other Price Funds
provided that no such loan may be made if, as a result, the aggregate of
such loans would exceed 33/1//\\/3/\\% of the value of the fund's total
assets; (ii) purchase money market securities and enter into repurchase
agreements; and (iii) acquire publicly distributed or privately placed
debt securities and purchase debt;
(5) Percent Limit on Assets Invested in Any One Issuer (California,
Tax-Efficient Balanced, Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth, Tax-Efficient
Growth, Tax-Exempt Money, Tax-Free High Yield, Tax-Free Income, Tax-Free
Intermediate Bond, and Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Funds Only) Purchase a
security if, as a result, with respect to 75% of the value of its total
assets, more than 5% of the value of the fund's total assets would be
invested in the securities of a single issuer, except securities issued
or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies or
instrumentalities;
(6) Percent Limit on Share Ownership of Any One Issuer (California,
Tax-Efficient Balanced, Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth, Tax-Efficient
Growth, Tax-Exempt Money, Tax-Free High Yield, Tax-Free Income, Tax-Free
Intermediate Bond, and Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Funds Only) Purchase a
security if, as a result, with respect to 75% of the value of the fund's
total assets, more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any
issuer would be held by the fund (other than obligations issued or
guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities);
(7) Real Estate Purchase or sell real estate, including limited partnership
interests therein, unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities
or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the fund from investing
in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or securities of
companies engaged in the real estate business);
(8) Senior Securities Issue senior securities except in compliance with the
1940 Act;
(9) Taxable Securities (All Funds, except Tax-Efficient Funds) During periods
of normal market conditions, purchase any security if, as a result, less
than 80% of the fund's income would be exempt from federal, and if
applicable, any state, city, or local income tax. Normally, the fund will
not purchase a security if, as a result, more than 20% of the fund's
income would be subject to the AMT; or
(10) Underwriting Underwrite securities issued by other persons, except to
the extent that the fund may be deemed to be an underwriter within the
meaning of the 1933 Act in connection with the purchase and sale of its
portfolio securities in the ordinary course of pursuing its investment
program.
38
<PAGE>
NOTES
The following Notes should be read in connection with the above-described
fundamental policies. The Notes are not fundamental policies.
With respect to investment restriction (1), the Money Funds have no
current intention of engaging in any borrowing transactions.
With respect to investment restriction (2), the fund does not consider
currency contracts or hybrid investments to be commodities.
For purposes of investment restriction (3), U.S., state, or local
governments, or related agencies or instrumentalities, are not considered
an industry. Industries are determined by reference to the
classifications of industries set forth in the fund's semiannual and
annual reports. It is the position of the Staff of the SEC that foreign
governments are industries for purposes of this restriction. Bonds which
are refunded with escrowed U.S. government securities or subject to
certain types of guarantees are not subject to the industry limitation of
25%.
For purposes of investment restriction (4), the fund will consider the
acquisition of a debt security to include the execution of a note or
other evidence of an extension of credit with a term of more than nine
months.
For purposes of investment restriction (9), the fund measures the amount
of its income from taxable securities, including AMT securities, over the
course of the fund's taxable year.
Operating Policies
As a matter of operating policy, the fund may not:
(1) Borrowing Purchase additional securities when money borrowed exceeds 5%
of its total assets;
(2) Control of Portfolio Companies Invest in companies for the purpose of
exercising management or control;
(3) Equity Securities (All Funds except Tax-Efficient Funds) Purchase any
equity security or security convertible into an equity security provided
that the fund (other than the Money Funds) may invest up to 10% of its
total assets in equity securities which pay tax-exempt dividends and
which are otherwise consistent with the fund's investment objective and,
further provided, that each Money Fund may invest up to 10% of its total
assets in equity securities of other tax-free open-end money market
funds;
(4) Futures Contracts Purchase a futures contract or an option thereon, if,
with respect to positions in futures or options on futures which do not
represent bona fide hedging, the aggregate initial margin and premiums on
such options would exceed 5% of the fund's net asset value;
(5) Illiquid Securities Purchase illiquid securities if, as a result, more
than 15% (10% for Money Funds) of its net assets would be invested in
such securities;
(6) Investment Companies Purchase securities of open-end or closed-end
investment companies except (i) in compliance with the Investment Company
Act of 1940; (ii) in the case of the Tax-Free Funds, only securities of
other tax-free money market funds; or (iii) in the case of Tax-Efficient
Funds, securities of the Reserve Investment or Government Reserve
Investment Funds;
(7) Margin Purchase securities on margin, except (i) for use of short-term
credit necessary for clearance of purchases of portfolio securities and
(ii) it may make margin deposits in connection with futures contracts or
other permissible investments;
(8) Mortgaging Mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or, in any manner, transfer any
security owned by the fund as security for indebtedness except as may be
necessary in connection with permissible borrowings or investments and
then such mortgaging, pledging, or hypothecating may not exceed
33/1//\\/3/\\% of the fund's total assets at the time of borrowing or
investment;
39
<PAGE>
(9) Oil and Gas Programs Purchase participations or other direct interests
in, or enter into leases with respect to oil, gas, or other mineral
exploration or development programs if, as a result thereof, more than 5%
of the value of the total assets of the fund would be invested in such
programs;
(10) Options, etc. Invest in puts, calls, straddles, spreads, or any
combination thereof, except to the extent permitted by the prospectus and
Statement of Additional Information;
(11) Short Sales Effect short sales of securities; or
(12) Warrants Invest in warrants if, as a result thereof, more than 2% of the
value of the net assets of the fund would be invested in warrants.
NOTES
With respect to investment restriction (6), the funds have no current
intention of purchasing the securities of other investment companies.
Duplicate fees could result from any such purchases.
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The officers and directors/trustees of the fund are listed below. Unless
otherwise noted, the address of each is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202. Except as indicated, each has been an employee of T. Rowe
Price for more than five years. In the list below, the fund's
directors/trustees who are considered "interested persons" of T. Rowe Price
as defined under Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act are noted with an asterisk
(*). These directors/trustees are referred to as inside directors by virtue
of their officership, directorship, and/or employment with T. Rowe Price.
Independent Directors/Trustees/(a)/
All Funds except Tax-Efficient Funds
CALVIN W. BURNETT, PH.D., 3/16/32, President, Coppin State College; formerly:
Director, Maryland Chamber of Commerce and Provident Bank of Maryland;
formerly: President, Baltimore Area Council Boy Scouts of America; Vice
President and Board of Directors, The Walters Art Gallery; Address: 2500 West
North Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21216
ANTHONY W. DEERING, 1/28/45, Director, Chairman of the Board, President, and
Chief Executive Officer, The Rouse Company, real estate developers, Columbia,
Maryland; Address: 10275 Little Patuxent Parkway, Columbia, Maryland 21044
F. PIERCE LINAWEAVER, 8/22/34, President, F. Pierce Linaweaver & Associates,
Inc.; Consulting Environmental & Civil Engineers; formerly (1987-1991)
Executive Vice President, EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., and
President, EA Engineering, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland; Address: Green Spring
Station, 2360 West Joppa Road, Suite 224, Lutherville, Maryland 21093
JOHN G. SCHREIBER, 10/21/46, Owner/President, Schreiber Investments, Inc., a
real estate investment company; Director, AMLI Residential Properties Trust
and Urban Shopping Centers, Inc.; Partner, Blackstone Real Estate Partners,
L.P.; Director and formerly Executive Vice President, JMB Realty Corporation,
a national real estate investment manager and developer; Address: Centaur
Capital Partners, One Westminster Place, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045
Tax-Efficient Funds
DONALD W. DICK, JR., 1/27/43, Principal, EuroCapital Advisors, LLC, an
acquisition and management advisory firm; formerly (5/89-6/95) Principal,
Overseas Partners, Inc., a financial investment firm; formerly (6/65-3/89)
Director and Vice President, Consumer Products Division, McCormick & Company,
Inc., international food processors; Director, Waverly, Inc., Baltimore,
Maryland; Address: 28 Loon Lane, Menemsha Inn Road, Chilmark, Massachusetts
02535
40
<PAGE>
DAVID K. FAGIN, 4/9/38, Director, Western Exploration and Development, Ltd.
(7/97 to present); Director, Dayton Mining Corporation (6/98 to present);
Chairman and President, Nye Corporation (6/88 to present); Director, Nescor
Corporation (6/94 to present); Director of Canyon Resources, Corp.; formerly:
Chairman (5/92 to 12/97) and Chief Executive Officer (5/92 to 5/96) of
Golden Star Resources Ltd.; formerly: President, Chief Operating Officer, and
Director, Homestake Mining Company (5/86 to 7/91); Address: 33 Glenmoor
Drive, Englewood, Colorado 80110-7115
HANNE M. MERRIMAN, 11/16/41, Retail Business Consultant; Director, Ann Taylor
Stores Corporation, Central Illinois Public Service Company, Ameren Corp.,
Finlay Enterprises, Inc., The Rouse Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company and USAirways Group, Inc.; Address: 3201 New Mexico Avenue,
N.W., Suite 350, Washington, D.C. 20016
HUBERT D. VOS, 8/2/33, Owner/President, Stonington Capital Corporation, a
private investment company; Address: 1114 State Street, Suite 247, P.O. Box
90409, Santa Barbara, California 93190-0409
PAUL M. WYTHES, 6/23/33, Founding Partner of Sutter Hill Ventures, a venture
capital limited partnership, providing equity capital to young high
technology companies throughout the United States; Director, Teltone
Corporation and InterVentional Technologies Inc.; Address: 755 Page Mill
Road, Suite A200, Palo Alto, California 94304-1005
(a) Unless otherwise indicated, the Independent Directors/Trustees have been
at their respective companies for at least five years.
Officers
HENRY H. HOPKINS, 12/23/42, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
International and T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc.; Director and
Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President and Director, T. Rowe Price Investment
Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
PATRICIA B. LIPPERT, 1/12/53, Secretary-Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe
Price and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
JOSEPH A. CARRIER, 12/30/60, Treasurer-Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T.
Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
DAVID S. MIDDLETON, 1/18/56, Controller-Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T.
Rowe Price Trust Company
INGRID I. VORDEMBERGE, 9/27/35, Assistant Vice President-Employee, T. Rowe
Price
California and State Tax-Free Trusts
* WILLIAM T. REYNOLDS, 5/26/48, Chairman of the Board-Director and Managing
Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst
* JAMES S. RIEPE, 6/25/43, Trustee-Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and
Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director,
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, President, and Trust
Officer, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director, T. Rowe Price International
and General Re Corporation
* M. DAVID TESTA, 4/22/44, Trustee-Director, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice Chairman of the Board and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Vice President and Director, T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
Chartered Financial Analyst
MARY J. MILLER, 7/19/55, President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
JANET G. ALBRIGHT, 3/31/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.
41
<PAGE>
PATRICE BERCHTENBREITER ELY, 1/13/53, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.
LINDA A. BRISSON, 7/8/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
JOSEPH K. LYNAGH, 6/9/58, Vice President-Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe
Price
KONSTANTINE B. MALLAS, 5/26/63, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
EDWARD T. SCHNEIDER, 9/19/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
State Tax-Free Trust Only
JEREMY N. BAKER, 2/27/68, Vice President-Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe
Price
PATRICIA S. DEFORD, 9/29/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
CHARLES B. HILL, 9/22/61, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
MARCY M. LASH, 1/30/63, Vice President-Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe
Price; (1998) formerly Assistant Vice President, underwriting, at Connie Lee
Insurance Company
HUGH D. MCGUIRK, 7/6/60, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
C. STEPHEN WOLFE II, 4/5/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Tax-Efficient Funds
* JAMES A.C. KENNEDY, 8/17/53, Director-Director and Managing Director, T.
Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst
* JAMES S. RIEPE, 6/25/43, Trustee-Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and
Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director,
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, President, and Trust
Officer, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director, T. Rowe Price International
and General Re Corporation
* M. DAVID TESTA, 4/22/44, Trustee-Director, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice Chairman of the Board and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Vice President and Director, T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
Chartered Financial Analyst
MARY J. MILLER, 7/19/55, President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
DONALD J. PETERS, 7/3/59, Executive Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe
Price
STEPHEN W. BOESEL, 12/28/44, Vice President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Group Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Trust Company
ROBERT N. GENSLER, 10/18/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
JILL L. HAUSER, 6/23/58, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
THOMAS J. HUBER, 9/23/66, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price;
formerly a Corporate Banking Officer with NationsBank; Chartered Financial
Analyst
HUGH D. MCGUIRK, 7/6/60, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
LARRY J. PUGLIA, 8/25/60, Vice President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Group, Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chartered
Financial Analyst
WILLIAM T. REYNOLDS, 5/26/48, Chairman of the Board-Director and Managing
Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst
WILLIAM J. STROMBERG, 3/10/60, Vice President-Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Group, Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.;
Chartered Financial Analyst
42
<PAGE>
ARTHUR S. VARNADO, 6/1/60, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
MARK R. WEIGMAN, 7/30/62, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T.
Rowe Price Trust Company; Chartered Financial Analyst
J. JEFFREY LANG, 1/10/62, Assistant Vice President-Assistant Vice President,
T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Tax-Exempt Money Fund
* WILLIAM T. REYNOLDS, 5/26/48, Chairman of the Board-Director and Managing
Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst
* JAMES S. RIEPE, 6/25/43, Trustee-Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and
Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director,
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, President, and Trust
Officer, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director, T. Rowe Price International
and General Re Corporation
* M. DAVID TESTA, 4/22/44, Trustee-Director, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice Chairman of the Board and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Vice President and Director, T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
Chartered Financial Analyst
PATRICE BERCHTENBREITER ELY, 1/13/53, President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
JANET G. ALBRIGHT, 3/31/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
JOSEPH K. LYNAGH, 6/9/58, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
MARY J. MILLER, 7/19/55, President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
EDWARD T. SCHNEIDER, 9/19/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Tax-Free High Yield Fund
* WILLIAM T. REYNOLDS, 5/26/48, Chairman of the Board-Director and Managing
Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst
* JAMES S. RIEPE, 6/25/43, Trustee-Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and
Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director,
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, President, and Trust
Officer, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director, T. Rowe Price International
and General Re Corporation
* M. DAVID TESTA, 4/22/44, Trustee-Director, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice Chairman of the Board and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Vice President and Director, T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
Chartered Financial Analyst
MARY J. MILLER, 7/19/55, President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
PATRICIA S. DEFORD, 9/29/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
CHARLES B. HILL, 9/22/61, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
MARCY M. LASH, 1/30/63, Vice President-Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe
Price; (1998) formerly Assistant Vice President, underwriting, at Connie Lee
Insurance Company
KONSTANTINE B. MALLAS, 5/26/63, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
HUGH D. MCGUIRK, 7/6/60, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
43
<PAGE>
EDWARD T. SCHNEIDER, 9/19/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
C. STEPHEN WOLFE II, 4/5/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Tax-Free Income Fund
* WILLIAM T. REYNOLDS, 5/26/48, Chairman of the Board-Director and Managing
Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst
* JAMES S. RIEPE, 6/25/43, Trustee-Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and
Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director,
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, President, and Trust
Officer, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director, T. Rowe Price International
and General Re Corporation
* M. DAVID TESTA, 4/22/44, Trustee-Director, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice Chairman of the Board and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Vice President and Director, T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
Chartered Financial Analyst
MARY J. MILLER, 7/19/55, President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
JANET G. ALBRIGHT, 3/31/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
JEREMY N. BAKER, 2/27/68, Vice President-Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe
Price
PATRICE BERCHTENBREITER ELY, 1/13/53, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe
Price
PATRICIA S. DEFORD, 9/29/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
CHARLES B. HILL, 9/22/61, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
MARCY M. LASH, 1/30/63, Vice President-Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe
Price; (1998) formerly Assistant Vice President, underwriting, at Connie Lee
Insurance Company
KONSTANTINE B. MALLAS, 5/26/63, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
HUGH D. MCGUIRK, 7/6/60, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
EDWARD T. SCHNEIDER, 9/19/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
C. STEPHEN WOLFE II, 4/5/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund
* WILLIAM T. REYNOLDS, 5/26/48, Chairman of the Board-Director and Managing
Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst
* JAMES S. RIEPE, 6/25/43, Trustee-Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and
Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director,
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, President, and Trust
Officer, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director, T. Rowe Price International
and General Re Corporation
* M. DAVID TESTA, 4/22/44, Trustee-Director, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice Chairman of the Board and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Vice President and Director, T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
Chartered Financial Analyst
CHARLES B. HILL, 9/22/61, President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
MARY J. MILLER, 7/19/55, President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
44
<PAGE>
PATRICIA S. DEFORD, 9/29/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
ERIC N. MADER, 12/20/68, Vice President-Employee, T. Rowe Price; (1998)
formerly Special Assistant to the CFO, District of Columbia Public Schools
KONSTANTINE B. MALLAS, 5/26/63, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
HUGH D. MCGUIRK, 7/6/60, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
EDWARD T. SCHNEIDER, 9/19/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund
* WILLIAM T. REYNOLDS, 5/26/48, Chairman of the Board-Director and Managing
Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst
* JAMES S. RIEPE, 6/25/43, Trustee-Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and
Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director,
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, President, and Trust
Officer, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director, T. Rowe Price International
and General Re Corporation
* M. DAVID TESTA, 4/22/44, Trustee-Director, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice Chairman of the Board and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice Chairman of the Board, Director and Managing Director, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Vice President and Director, T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
Chartered Financial Analyst
MARY J. MILLER, 7/19/55, President-Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.; Managing Director, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
CHARLES B. HILL, 9/22/61, Executive Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe
Price
JANET G. ALBRIGHT, 3/31/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
PATRICE BERCHTENBREITER ELY, 1/13/53, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe
Price
PATRICIA S. DEFORD, 9/29/57, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
KONSTANTINE B. MALLAS, 5/26/63, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
HUGH D. MCGUIRK, 7/6/60, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
EDWARD T. SCHNEIDER, 9/19/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
C. STEPHEN WOLFE II, 4/5/59, Vice President-Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Compensation Table
The funds do not pay pension or retirement benefits to their independent
officers or directors/trustees. Also, any director/trustee of a fund who is
an officer or employee of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International does
not receive any remuneration from the fund.
45
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Person, Aggregate Compensation from Total Compensation from Fund and
Position Fund(a) Fund Complex Paid to Directors/
--------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Trustees(b)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
<S> <S> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,486 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,328 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,486 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,486 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Tax-Free Money Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,355 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,281 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,355 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,355 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,350 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,281 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,350 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,350 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,314 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,272 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,314 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,314 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,383 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,296 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,383 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,383 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $2,363 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,618 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 2,363 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 2,363 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,374 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,291 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,374 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,374 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York Tax-Free Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,468 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,335 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,468 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,468 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York Tax-Free Money Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,365 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,284 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,365 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,365 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,275 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,260 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,275 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,275 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia Tax-Free Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Trustee $1,548 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Trustee 1,349 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Trustee 1,548 67,000
John G. Schriber, Trustee 1,548 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund
Donald W. Dick, Jr., Director $1,008 $82,000
David K. Fagin, Director 1,020 65,000
Hanne M. Merriman, Director 1,020 65,000
Hubert D. Vos, Director 1,020 66,000
Paul M. Wythes, Director 1,008 80,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Efficient Growth Fund
Donald W. Dick, Jr., Director $ 604 $82,000
David K. Fagin, Director 615 65,000
Hanne M. Merriman, Director 611 65,000
Hubert D. Vos, Director 611 66,000
Paul M. Wythes, Director 604 80,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth Fund
Donald W. Dick, Jr., Director $ 359 $82,000
David K. Fagin, Director 285 65,000
Hanne M. Merriman, Director 285 65,000
Hubert D. Vos, Director 289 66,000
Paul M. Wythes, Director 351 80,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Exempt Money Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Director $1,962 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Director 1,480 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Director 1,962 67,000
John G. Schriber, Director 1,962 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Free High Yield Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Director $2,619 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Director 1,695 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Director 2,619 67,000
John G. Schriber, Director 2,619 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Free Income Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Director $2,763 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Director 1,750 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Director 2,763 67,000
John G. Schriber, Director 2,763 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Director $1,373 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Director 1,289 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Director 1,373 67,000
John G. Schriber, Director 1,373 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund
Calvin W. Burnett, Director $1,713 $65,000
Anthony W. Deering, Director 1,402 80,000
F. Pierce Linaweaver, Director 1,713 67,000
John G. Schriber, Director 1,713 67,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE>
47
<PAGE>
(a) Amounts in this column are based on accrued compensation from March 1,
1999 to February 29, 2000.
(b) Amounts in this column are based on compensation received from January
1, 1999, to December 31, 1999. The T. Rowe Price complex included 88 funds
as of December 31, 1999.
All Funds
The fund's Executive Committee, consisting of the fund's interested
directors/trustees, has been authorized by its respective Board of
Directors/Trustees to exercise all powers of the Board to manage the funds in
the intervals between meetings of the Board, except the powers prohibited by
statute from being delegated.
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of the date of the prospectus, the officers and directors/trustees of the
fund, as a group, owned less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the fund.
As of October 31, 2000, the following shareholders of record owned more than
5% of the outstanding shares of the fund:
New York Tax-Free Money Fund: Coleman M. Brandt and Grace L. Brandt JT TEN,
330 West 72nd Street, Apt. 10A, New York, New York 10023-2649.
Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund: TRP Finance, Inc., 802 West Street, Suite 301,
Wilmington, Delaware 19801-1526.
Tax-Exempt Money Fund: Susan A. Feith, 700 Belle Isle, Wisconsin Rapids,
Wisconsin 54494-4174
48
<PAGE>
Tax-Exempt Money Fund-PLUS Class: Larry J. Neiterman and Elin W. Neiterman JT
TEN, 8 Red Oak Drive, Sudbury, Massachusetts 01776-2826; George W. Mead, 700
Belle Isle, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin 54494-4174; Richard D. Vap, 12362
Dumont Way, Littleton, Colorado 80125-9713.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Services
Under the Management Agreement, T. Rowe Price provides the fund with
discretionary investment services. Specifically, T. Rowe Price is responsible
for supervising and directing the investments of the fund in accordance with
the fund's investment objectives, program, and restrictions as provided in
its prospectus and this Statement of Additional Information. T. Rowe Price is
also responsible for effecting all security transactions on behalf of the
fund, including the negotiation of commissions and the allocation of
principal business and portfolio brokerage. In addition to these services, T.
Rowe Price provide the fund with certain corporate administrative services,
including: maintaining the fund's corporate existence and corporate records;
registering and qualifying fund shares under federal laws; monitoring the
financial, accounting, and administrative functions of the fund; maintaining
liaison with the agents employed by the fund such as the fund's custodian and
transfer agent; assisting the fund in the coordination of such agents'
activities; and permitting T. Rowe Price's employees to serve as officers,
directors/trustees, and committee members of the fund without cost to the
fund.
The Management Agreement also provides that T. Rowe Price, its
directors/trustees, officers, employees, and certain other persons performing
specific functions for the fund will only be liable to the fund for losses
resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless
disregard of duty.
Management Fee
The fund pays T. Rowe Price a fee ("Fee") which consists of two components: a
Group Management Fee ("Group Fee") and an Individual Fund Fee ("Fund Fee").
The Fee is paid monthly to T. Rowe Price on the first business day of the
next succeeding calendar month and is calculated as described next.
The monthly Group Fee ("Monthly Group Fee") is the sum of the daily Group Fee
accruals ("Daily Group Fee Accruals") for each month. The Daily Group Fee
Accrual for any particular day is computed by multiplying the Price Funds'
group fee accrual as determined below ("Daily Price Funds' Group Fee
Accrual") by the ratio of the Price Fund's net assets for that day to the sum
of the aggregate net assets of the Price Funds for that day. The Daily Price
Funds' Group Fee Accrual for any particular day is calculated by multiplying
the fraction of one (1) over the number of calendar days in the year by the
annualized Daily Price Funds' Group Fee Accrual for that day as determined in
accordance with the following schedule:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
0.480% First $1 billion 0.360% Next $2 billion 0.310% Next $16 billion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.450% Next $1 billion 0.350% Next $2 billion 0.305% Next $30 billion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.420% Next $1 billion 0.340% Next $5 billion 0.300% Thereafter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.390% Next $1 billion 0.330% Next $10 billion
----------------------------------------------------
0.370% Next $1 billion 0.320% Next $10 billion
</TABLE>
For the purpose of calculating the Group Fee, the Price Funds include all the
mutual funds distributed by Investment Services, (excluding the T. Rowe Price
Spectrum Funds, and any institutional, index, or private label mutual funds).
For the purpose of calculating the Daily Price Funds' Group Fee Accrual for
any particular day, the net assets of each Price Fund are determined in
accordance with the funds' prospectus as of the close of business on the
previous business day on which the fund was open for business.
The monthly Fund Fee ("Monthly Fund Fee") is the sum of the daily Fund Fee
accruals ("Daily Fund Fee Accruals") for each month. The Daily Fund Fee
Accrual for any particular day is computed by multiplying the fraction of one
(1) over the number of calendar days in the year by the individual Fund Fee
Rate and multiplying this product by the net assets of the fund for that day,
as determined in accordance with the
49
<PAGE>
fund's prospectus as of the close of business on the previous business day on
which the fund was open for business. The individual fund fees are listed in
the following chart:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond Fund 0.10%
California Tax-Free Money Fund 0.10
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund 0.05
Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund 0.10
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund 0.10
Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund 0.10
Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond Fund 0.10
New York Tax-Free Bond Fund 0.10
New York Tax-Free Money Fund 0.10
Virginia Tax-Free Bond Fund 0.10
Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund 0.20
Tax-Efficient Growth Fund 0.30
Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth Fund 0.35
Tax-Exempt Money Fund 0.10
Tax-Free High Yield Fund 0.30
Tax-Free Income Fund 0.15
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund 0.05
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund 0.10
</TABLE>
The following chart sets forth the total management fees, if any, paid to T.
Rowe Price by each fund, during the last three years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond $ 932,000 $ 878,000 $ 744,000
California Tax-Free Money 344,000 333,000 263,000
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free 352,000 343,000 302,000
Georgia Tax-Free Bond 191,000 157,000 108,000
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond 532,000 468,000 488,000
Maryland Tax-Free Bond 4,357,000 4,157,000 3,659,000
Maryland Tax-Free Money 0(b) 0(b) 0(b)
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond 506,000 462,000 352,000
New York Tax-Free Bond 863,000 818,000 670,000
New York Tax-Free Money 384,000 348,000 281,000
Virginia Tax-Free Bond 1,171,000 1,081,000 895,000
Tax-Efficient Balanced 200,000 14,000 0(b)
Tax-Efficient Growth 192,000 0(b) 0(b)
Tax-Exempt Money 2,774,000 3,176,000 2,989,000
Tax-Exempt Money Fund-PLUS Class 55,000 2,000 0(b)
Tax-Free High Yield 7,823,000 8,119,000 7,051,000
Tax-Free Income 6,600,000 6,800,000 6,428,000
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond 455,000 438,000 391,000
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 1,811,000 1,895,000 1,856,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
50
<PAGE>
(a) Due to effect of expense limitations discussed below, the fund did
not pay T. Rowe Price an investment management fee.
(b) Prior to commencement of operations.
Limitation on Fund Expenses
The Management Agreement between the fund and T. Rowe Price provides that the
fund will bear all expenses of its operations not specifically assumed by T.
Rowe Price.
For the purpose of determining whether a fund is entitled to reimbursement,
the expenses of a fund are calculated on a monthly basis. If a fund is
entitled to reimbursement, that month's advisory fee will be reduced or
postponed, with any adjustment made after the end of the year.
The following chart sets forth expense ratio limitations and the periods for
which they are effective. For each, T. Rowe Price has agreed to bear any fund
expenses (other than interest, taxes, brokerage, and other expenditures that
are capitalized in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and extraordinary expenses) which would cause the fund's ratio of expenses to
average net assets to exceed the indicated percentage limitations. The
expenses borne by T. Rowe Price are subject to reimbursement by the fund
through the indicated reimbursement date, provided no reimbursement will be
made if it would result in the fund's expense ratio exceeding its applicable
limitation.
No reimbursements may be made for the California and New York Funds unless
approved by shareholders.
California Tax-Free Money Fund, Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund, Maryland
Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund, Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund, New York
Tax-Free Money Fund, Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund, Tax-Efficient Growth Fund,
Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth Fund, and Tax-Exempt Money Fund-PLUS Class
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Expense Reimbursement
Fund Limitation Period ------- -------------
---- ----------------- Ratio Date
----- ----
Limitation
----------
<S> <S> <C> <S>
0
.
March 1, 1999 - 55
California Tax-Free Money February 28, 2001 % February 28, 2003
0.
March 1, 1999 - 65
Georgia Tax-Free Bond February 28, 2001 % February 28, 2003
0
.
March 1, 2001 - 60
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond February 28, 2003 % February 28, 2005
February 28, 2001 -
Maryland Tax-Free Money February 28, 2003 February 28, 2005
0
.
March 15, 1999 - 5
New York Tax-Free Money February 28, 2001 5% February 28, 2003
1
.
March 1, 1999 - 00
Tax-Efficient Balanced February 28, 2001 % February 28, 2003
1.
1
July 30, 1999 - 0
Tax-Efficient Growth February 28, 2001 % February 28, 2003
December 29, 2000 -
Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth February 28, 2002 1.25% February 28, 2004
Tax-Exempt Money Fund-PLUS Class May 1, 2000 - April 1.00% April 30, 2002
30, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
California Tax-Free Money and New York Tax-Free Money Funds
Pursuant to the California Money Fund's present expense limitation, $80,000,
of management fees were not accrued for the year ended February 29, 2000.
Additionally, $188,000 of unaccrued management fees related to a previous
expense limitation remain subject to reimbursement through February 28,
2001.Pursuant to the New York Money Fund's present expense limitations,
$70,000 of management fees were not accrued for the year ended February 29,
2000. Additionally, $177,000 of unaccrued management fees related to a
previous expense limitation remain subject to reimbursement through February
28, 2001.
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
Pursuant to a previous expense limitation, $6,000 of unaccrued management
fees were repaid during the year ended February 29, 2000.
51
<PAGE>
Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund
Pursuant to the present expense limitation, $61,000 of management fees were
not accrued by the fund for the year ended February 29, 2000. Additionally,
$158,000 of unaccrued management fees related to a previous expense
limitation are subject to reimbursement through February 28, 2001.
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
Pursuant to a previous expense limitation, $2,000 of management fees were not
accrued by the fund for the year ended February 29, 2000. Additionally,
$7,000 of unaccrued management fees related to a previous expense limitation
are subject to reimbursement through February 28, 2001.
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond Fund
Pursuant to the previous expense limitation, $17,000 of unaccrued 1998-1999
fees were repaid during the year ended February 29, 2000, and $8,000 remains
subject to reimbursement through February 28, 2001.
Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund
Pursuant to the present expense limitation, $6,000 of management fees were
not accrued by the fund for the year ended February 29, 2000. Additionally,
$200,000 of unaccrued management fees and expenses related to a previous
limitation remain subject to reimbursement through February 28, 2001.
Tax-Efficient Growth Fund
Pursuant to the present expense limitation, $32,000 of management fees were
not accrued by the fund for the year ended February 29, 2000.
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund
Pursuant to the previous expense limitation, $23,000 of unaccrued fees were
repaid during the year ended February 29, 2000.
Management Related Services
As noted above, the Management Agreement spells out the expenses to be paid
by the fund. In addition to the Management Fee, the fund pays for the
following: shareholder service expenses; custodial, accounting, legal, and
audit fees; costs of preparing and printing prospectuses and reports sent to
shareholders; registration fees and expenses; proxy and annual meeting
expenses (if any); and director/trustee fees and expenses.
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price,
acts as the fund's transfer and dividend disbursing agent and provides
shareholder and administrative services. Services for certain types of
retirement plans are provided by T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services,
Inc., also a wholly owned subsidiary. The address for each is 100 East Pratt
St., Baltimore, MD 21202. Additionally, T. Rowe Price, under a separate
agreement with the funds, provides accounting services to the funds.
The funds paid the expenses shown in the following table for the fiscal year
ended February 29, 2000, to T. Rowe Price and its affiliates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund Transfer Agent and Accounting
---- Shareholder Services Services
-------------------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond $ 122,000 $ 77,000
California Tax-Free Money 69,000 70,000
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free 54,000 70,000
Georgia Tax-Free Bond 52,000 70,000
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond 74,000 70,000
Maryland Tax-Free Bond 478,000 86,000
Maryland Tax-Free Money - -
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond 86,000 70,000
New York Tax-Free Bond 138,000 77,000
New York Tax-Free Money 64,000 70,000
Virginia Tax-Free Bond 165,000 70,000
Tax-Efficient Balanced 46,000 64,000
Tax-Efficient Growth 67,000 37,000
Tax-Exempt Money 2,888,000 105,000
Tax-Exempt Money Fund-PLUS Class 9,000 2,000
Tax-Free High Yield 615,000 116,000
Tax-Free Income 582,000 116,000
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond 101,000 70,000
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 209,000 95,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
52
<PAGE>
Control of Investment Advisor
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., ("Group") owns 100% of the stock of T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc. Group was formed in 2000 as a holding company for the T.
Rowe Price affiliated companies.
DISTRIBUTOR FOR THE FUNDS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment Services, a Maryland corporation formed in 1980 as a wholly owned
subsidiary of T. Rowe Price, serves as the fund's distributor. Investment
Services is registered as a broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and is a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. The offering of the fund's shares is continuous.
Investment Services is located at the same address as the fund and T. Rowe
Price-100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.
Investment Services serves as distributor to the fund pursuant to an
Underwriting Agreement ("Underwriting Agreement"), which provides that the
fund will pay all fees and expenses in connection with: necessary state
filings; preparing, setting in type, printing, and mailing its prospectuses
and reports to shareholders; and issuing its shares, including expenses of
confirming purchase orders.
The Underwriting Agreement provides that Investment Services will pay all
fees and expenses in connection with: printing and distributing prospectuses
and reports for use in offering and selling fund shares; preparing, setting
in type, printing, and mailing all sales literature and advertising;
Investment Services' federal and state registrations as a broker-dealer; and
offering and selling shares, except for those fees and expenses specifically
assumed by the fund. Investment Services' expenses are paid by T. Rowe Price.
Investment Services acts as the agent of the fund in connection with the sale
of its shares in the various states in which Investment Services is qualified
as a broker-dealer. Under the Underwriting Agreement, Investment Services
accepts orders for fund shares at net asset value. No sales charges are paid
by investors or the fund.
CUSTODIAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Street Bank and Trust Company is the custodian for the fund's U.S.
securities and cash, but it does not participate in the fund's investment
decisions. Portfolio securities purchased in the U.S. are maintained in the
custody of the Bank and may be entered into the Federal Reserve Book Entry
System, or the security
53
<PAGE>
depository system of the Depository Trust Corporation. State Street Bank's
main office is at 225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110.
Tax-Efficient Funds
The fund has entered into a Custodian Agreement with The Chase Manhattan
Bank, N.A., London, pursuant to which portfolio securities which are
purchased outside the United States are maintained in the custody of various
foreign branches of The Chase Manhattan Bank and such other custodians,
including foreign banks and foreign securities depositories as are approved
in accordance with regulations under the 1940 Act. The address for The Chase
Manhattan Bank, N.A., London is Woolgate House, Coleman Street, London, EC2P
2HD, England.
SERVICES BY OUTSIDE PARTIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The shares of some fund shareholders are held in omnibus accounts maintained
by various third parties, including retirement plan sponsors, insurance
companies, banks and broker-dealers. The fund has adopted an administrative
fee payment ("AFP") program that authorizes the fund to make payments to
these third parties. The payments are made for transfer agent, recordkeeping
and other administrative services provided by, or on behalf of, the third
parties with respect to such shareholders and the omnibus accounts.
CODE OF ETHICS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fund, its investment adviser (T. Rowe Price), and its principal
underwriter (T. Rowe Price Investment Services), have a written Code of
Ethics which requires all Access Persons to obtain prior clearance before
engaging in personal securities transactions. In addition, all Access Persons
must report their personal securities transactions within 10 days of their
execution. Access Persons will not be permitted to effect transactions in a
security: if there are pending client orders in the security; the security
has been purchased or sold by a client within seven calendar days; the
security is being considered for purchase for a client; or the security is
subject to internal trading restrictions. In addition, Access Persons are
prohibited from profiting from short-term trading (e.g., purchases and sales
involving the same security within 60 days). Any person becoming an Access
Person must file a statement of personal securities holdings within 10 days
of this date. All Access Persons are required to file an annual statement
with respect to their personal securities holdings. Any material violation of
the Code of Ethics is reported to the Board of the fund. The Board also
reviews the administration of the Code of Ethics on an annual basis.
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment or Brokerage Discretion
Decisions with respect to the purchase and sale of portfolio securities on
behalf of the fund are made by T. Rowe Price. T. Rowe Price is also
responsible for implementing these decisions, including the negotiation of
commissions and the allocation of portfolio brokerage and principal business.
The fund's purchases and sales of fixed income portfolio securities are
normally done on a principal basis and do not involve the payment of a
commission although they may involve the designation of selling concessions.
That part of the discussion below relating solely to brokerage commissions
would not normally apply to the fund (other than Tax-Efficient Funds to the
extent they purchase equity securities). However, it is included because T.
Rowe Price does manage a significant number of common stock portfolios
(including the equity portion of the Tax-Efficient Funds) which do engage in
agency transactions and pay commissions and because some research and
services resulting from the payment of such commissions may benefit the fund.
54
<PAGE>
How Brokers and Dealers Are Selected
Equity Securities
In purchasing and selling equity securities, it is T. Rowe Price's policy to
obtain quality execution at the most favorable prices through responsible
brokers and dealers and at competitive commission rates where such rates are
negotiable. However, under certain conditions, the fund may pay higher
brokerage commissions in return for brokerage and research services. As a
general practice, over-the-counter orders are executed with market-makers. In
selecting among market-makers, T. Rowe Price generally seeks to select those
it believes to be actively and effectively trading the security being
purchased or sold. In selecting broker-dealers to execute the fund's
portfolio transactions, consideration is given to such factors as the price
of the security, the rate of the commission, the size and difficulty of the
order, the reliability, integrity, financial condition, general execution and
operational capabilities of competing brokers and dealers, their expertise in
particular markets and brokerage and research services provided by them. It
is not the policy of T. Rowe Price to seek the lowest available commission
rate where it is believed that a broker or dealer charging a higher
commission rate would offer greater reliability or provide better price or
execution.
Fixed Income Securities
Fixed income securities are generally purchased from the issuer or a primary
market-maker acting as principal for the securities on a net basis, with no
brokerage commission being paid by the client although the price usually
includes an undisclosed compensation. Transactions placed through dealers
serving as primary market-makers reflect the spread between the bid and asked
prices. Securities may also be purchased from underwriters at prices which
include underwriting fees.
With respect to equity and fixed income securities, T. Rowe Price may effect
principal transactions on behalf of the fund with a broker or dealer who
furnishes brokerage and/or research services, designate any such broker or
dealer to receive selling concessions, discounts, or other allowances, or
otherwise deal with any such broker or dealer in connection with the
acquisition of securities in underwritings. T. Rowe Price may receive
research services in connection with brokerage transactions, including
designations in fixed price offerings.
How Evaluations Are Made of the Overall Reasonableness of Brokerage Commissions
Paid
On a continuing basis, T. Rowe Price seeks to determine what levels of
commission rates are reasonable in the marketplace for transactions executed
on behalf of the fund. In evaluating the reasonableness of commission rates,
T. Rowe Price considers: (a) historical commission rates; (b) rates which
other institutional investors are paying, based on available public
information; (c) rates quoted by brokers and dealers; (d) the size of a
particular transaction, in terms of the number of shares, dollar amount, and
number of clients involved; (e) the complexity of a particular transaction in
terms of both execution and settlement; (f) the level and type of business
done with a particular firm over a period of time; and (g) the extent to
which the broker or dealer has capital at risk in the transaction.
Descriptions of Research Services Received From Brokers and Dealers
T. Rowe Price receives a wide range of research services from brokers and
dealers. These services include information on the economy, industries,
groups of securities, individual companies, statistical information,
accounting and tax law interpretations, political developments, legal
developments affecting portfolio securities, technical market action, pricing
and appraisal services, credit analysis, risk measurement analysis,
performance analysis, and analysis of corporate responsibility issues. These
services provide both domestic and international perspective. Research
services are received primarily in the form of written reports, computer
generated services, telephone contacts, and personal meetings with security
analysts. In addition, such services may be provided in the form of meetings
arranged with corporate and industry spokespersons, economists, academicians,
and government representatives. In some cases, research services are
generated by third parties but are provided to T. Rowe Price by or through
broker-dealers.
Research services received from brokers and dealers are supplemental to T.
Rowe Price's own research effort and, when utilized, are subject to internal
analysis before being incorporated by T. Rowe Price into its investment
process. As a practical matter, it would not be possible for T. Rowe Price's
Equity Research Division to generate all of the information presently
provided by brokers and dealers. T. Rowe Price pays cash
55
<PAGE>
for certain research services received from external sources. T. Rowe Price
also allocates brokerage for research services which are available for cash.
While receipt of research services from brokerage firms has not reduced T.
Rowe Price's normal research activities, the expenses of T. Rowe Price could
be materially increased if it attempted to generate such additional
information through its own staff. To the extent that research services of
value are provided by brokers or dealers, T. Rowe Price may be relieved of
expenses which it might otherwise bear.
T. Rowe Price has a policy of not allocating brokerage business in return for
products or services other than brokerage or research services. In accordance
with the provisions of Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
T. Rowe Price may from time to time receive services and products which serve
both research and non-research functions. In such event, T. Rowe Price makes
a good faith determination of the anticipated research and non-research use
of the product or service and allocates brokerage only with respect to the
research component.
Commissions to Brokers Who Furnish Research Services
Certain brokers and dealers who provide quality brokerage and execution
services also furnish research services to T. Rowe Price. With regard to the
payment of brokerage commissions, T. Rowe Price has adopted a brokerage
allocation policy embodying the concepts of Section 28(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, which permits an investment adviser to cause an account
to pay commission rates in excess of those another broker or dealer would
have charged for effecting the same transaction, if the adviser determines in
good faith that the commission paid is reasonable in relation to the value of
the brokerage and research services provided. The determination may be viewed
in terms of either the particular transaction involved or the overall
responsibilities of the adviser with respect to the accounts over which it
exercises investment discretion. Accordingly, while T. Rowe Price cannot
readily determine the extent to which commission rates or net prices charged
by broker-dealers reflect the value of their research services, T. Rowe Price
would expect to assess the reasonableness of commissions in light of the
total brokerage and research services provided by each particular broker. T.
Rowe Price may receive research, as defined in Section 28(e), in connection
with selling concessions and designations in fixed price offerings in which
the funds participate.
Internal Allocation Procedures
T. Rowe Price has a policy of not precommitting a specific amount of business
to any broker or dealer over any specific time period. Historically, the
majority of brokerage placement has been determined by the needs of a
specific transaction such as market-making, availability of a buyer or seller
of a particular security, or specialized execution skills. However, T. Rowe
Price does have an internal brokerage allocation procedure for that portion
of its discretionary client brokerage business where special needs do not
exist, or where the business may be allocated among several brokers or
dealers which are able to meet the needs of the transaction.
Each year, T. Rowe Price assesses the contribution of the brokerage and
research services provided by brokers or dealers, and attempts to allocate a
portion of its brokerage business in response to these assessments. Research
analysts, counselors, various investment committees, and the Trading
Department each seek to evaluate the brokerage and research services they
receive from brokers or dealers and make judgments as to the level of
business which would recognize such services. In addition, brokers or dealers
sometimes suggest a level of business they would like to receive in return
for the various brokerage and research services they provide. Actual
brokerage received by any firm may be less than the suggested allocations but
can, and often does, exceed the suggestions, because the total business is
allocated on the basis of all the considerations described above. In no case
is a broker or dealer excluded from receiving business from T. Rowe Price
because it has not been identified as providing research services.
Miscellaneous
T. Rowe Price's brokerage allocation policy is consistently applied to all
its fully discretionary accounts, which represent a substantial majority of
all assets under management. Research services furnished by brokers or
dealers through which T. Rowe Price effects securities transactions may be
used in servicing all accounts (including non-fund accounts) managed by T.
Rowe Price. Conversely, research services received from brokers
56
<PAGE>
or dealers which execute transactions for the fund are not necessarily used
by T. Rowe Price exclusively in connection with the management of the fund.
From time to time, orders for clients may be placed through a computerized
transaction network.
The fund does not allocate business to any broker-dealer on the basis of its
sales of the fund's shares. However, this does not mean that broker-dealers
who purchase fund shares for their clients will not receive business from the
fund.
Some of T. Rowe Price's other clients have investment objectives and programs
similar to those of the fund. T. Rowe Price may occasionally make
recommendations to other clients which result in their purchasing or selling
securities simultaneously with the fund. As a result, the demand for
securities being purchased or the supply of securities being sold may
increase, and this could have an adverse effect on the price of those
securities. It is T. Rowe Price's policy not to favor one client over another
in making recommendations or in placing orders. T. Rowe Price frequently
follows the practice of grouping orders of various clients for execution
which generally results in lower commission rates being attained. In certain
cases, where the aggregate order is executed in a series of transactions at
various prices on a given day, each participating client's proportionate
share of such order reflects the average price paid or received with respect
to the total order. T. Rowe Price has established a general investment policy
that it will ordinarily not make additional purchases of a common stock of a
company for its clients (including the T. Rowe Price funds) if, as a result
of such purchases, 10% or more of the outstanding common stock of such
company would be held by its clients in the aggregate.
To the extent possible, T. Rowe Price intends to recapture solicitation fees
paid in connection with tender offers through Investment Services, the fund's
distributor. At the present time, T. Rowe Price does not recapture
commissions or underwriting discounts or selling group concessions in
connection with taxable securities acquired in underwritten offerings. T.
Rowe Price does, however, attempt to negotiate elimination of all or a
portion of the selling group concession or underwriting discount when
purchasing tax-exempt municipal securities on behalf of its clients in
underwritten offerings.
Trade Allocation Policies
T. Rowe Price has developed written trade allocation guidelines for its
Equity, Municipal, and Taxable Fixed Income Trading Desks. Generally, when
the amount of securities available in a public offering or the secondary
market is insufficient to satisfy the volume or price requirements for the
participating client portfolios, the guidelines require a pro-rata allocation
based upon the amounts initially requested by each portfolio manager. In
allocating trades made on combined basis, the Trading Desks seek to achieve
the same net unit price of the securities for each participating client.
Because a pro-rata allocation may not always adequately accommodate all facts
and circumstances, the guidelines provide for exceptions to allocate trades
on an adjusted, pro-rata basis. Examples of where adjustments may be made
include: (i) reallocations to recognize the efforts of a portfolio manager in
negotiating a transaction or a private placement; (ii) reallocations to
eliminate deminimis positions; (iii) priority for accounts with specialized
investment policies and objectives; and (iv) reallocations in light of a
participating portfolio's characteristics (e.g., industry or issuer
concentration, duration, and credit exposure).
57
<PAGE>
Other
The funds engaged in portfolio transactions involving broker-dealers in the
following amounts for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2000, February 28,
1999, and 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond $ 399,657,000 $ 302,677,000 $ 289,794,000
California Tax-Free Money 529,005,000 515,251,000 506,606,000
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free 164,457,000 141,767,000 142,932,000
Georgia Tax-Free Bond 128,761,000 73,638,000 97,029,000
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free
Bond 208,764,000 191,989,000 221,540,000
Maryland Tax-Free Bond 1,074,813,000 837,338,000 918,045,000
Maryland Tax-Free Money 0(a) 0(a) 0(a)
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond 246,768,000 158,774,000 161,209,000
New York Tax-Free Bond 557,693,000 445,461,000 354,373,000
New York Tax-Free Money 445,916,000 553,482,000 444,785,000
Virginia Tax-Free Bond 501,953,000 492,844,000 563,466,000
Tax-Efficient Balanced 35,978,000 51,569,000 39,110,000
Tax-Efficient Growth 190,748,000 0(a) 0(a)
Tax-Exempt Money 3,074,940,000 3,124,018,000 3,600,294,000
Tax-Free High Yield 2,863,124,000 2,000,100,000 1,755,491,000
Tax-Free Income 2,483,560,000 1,941,518,000 2,257,818,000
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond 233,442,000 153,826,000 272,682,000
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 940,315,000 642,536,000 1,149,079,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) Prior to commencement of operations.
The following amounts consisted of principal transactions as to which the
funds have no knowledge of the profits or losses realized by the respective
broker-dealers for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2000, February 28,
1999, and 1998:
58
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond $ 363,741,000 $ 251,425,000 $ 253,929,000
California Tax-Free Money 529,005,000 510,210,000 503,591,000
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free 157,690,000 129,590,000 128,653,000
Georgia Tax-Free Bond 111,145,000 60,945,000 85,009,000
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free
Bond 202,708,000 188,399,000 193,471,000
Maryland Tax-Free Bond 936,693,000 708,876,000 793,036,000
Maryland Tax-Free Money 0(a) 0(a) 0(a)
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond 210,964,000 140,671,000 136,223,000
New York Tax-Free Bond 509,250,000 383,633,000 299,419,000
New York Tax-Free Money 445,916,000 542,945,000 441,384,000
Virginia Tax-Free Bond 453,295,000 419,010,000 518,159,000
Tax-Efficient Balanced 27,426,000 37,355,000 27,555,000
Tax-Efficient Growth 108,589,000 0(a) 0(a)
Tax-Exempt Money 3,074,134,000 3,089,301,000 3,586,230,000
Tax-Free High Yield 2,557,197,000 1,644,317,000 1,527,098,000
Tax-Free Income 2,190,578,000 1,651,454,000 1,959,351,000
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond 221,818,000 143,749,000 249,144,000
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 917,005,000 603,036,000 1,083,550,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) Prior to commencement of operations.
The following amounts involved trades with brokers acting as agents or
underwriters for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2000, February 28, 1999,
and 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond $ 35,916,000 $ 51,252,000 $ 35,865,000
California Tax-Free Money 0 5,041,000 3,016,000
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free 6,767,000 12,177,000 14,279,000
Georgia Tax-Free Bond 17,616,000 12,693,000 12,020,000
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond 6,056,000 3,590,000 28,069,000
Maryland Tax-Free Bond 138,120,000 128,462,000 125,009,000
Maryland Tax-Free Money 0(a) 0(a) 0(a)
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond 35,804,000 18,103,000 24,987,000
New York Tax-Free Bond 48,443,000 61,828,000 54,954,000
New York Tax-Free Money 0 10,537,000 3,401,000
Virginia Tax-Free Bond 48,658,000 73,834,000 45,307,000
Tax-Efficient Balanced 8,552,000 14,214,000 11,555,000
Tax-Efficient Growth 82,159,000 0(a) 0(a)
Tax-Exempt Money 806,000 34,717,000 14,064,000
Tax-Free High Yield 305,927,000 355,783,000 228,393,000
Tax-Free Income 292,982,000 290,064,000 298,468,000
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond 11,624,000 10,077,000 23,538,000
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 23,310,000 39,500,000 65,529,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) Prior to commencement of operations.
59
<PAGE>
The following amounts involved trades with brokers acting as agents or
underwriters, in which such brokers received total commissions, including
discounts received in connection with underwritings for the fiscal years
ended February 29, 2000, February 28, 1999, and 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond $ 228,000 $ 273,000 $ 206,000
California Tax-Free Money 0 10,000 2,000
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free 40,000 48,000 59,000
Georgia Tax-Free Bond 80,000 51,000 74,000
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond 45,000 16,000 106,000
Maryland Tax-Free Bond 660,000 545,000 680,000
Maryland Tax-Free Money 0(a) 0(a) 0(a)
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond 151,000 88,000 176,000
New York Tax-Free Bond 280,000 353,000 362,000
New York Tax-Free Money 0 1,000 24,000
Virginia Tax-Free Bond 238,000 346,000 271,000
Tax-Efficient Balanced 50,000 47,000 33,000
Tax-Efficient Growth 41,000 0(a) 0(a)
Tax-Exempt Money 8,000 131,000 32,000
Tax-Free High Yield 2,301,000 2,152,000 1,655,000
Tax-Free Income 1,409,000 1,488,000 1,747,000
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond 46,000 49,000 112,000
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 110,000 147,000 289,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) Prior to commencement of operations.
Of all such portfolio transactions, none were placed with firms which
provided research, statistical, or other services to T. Rowe Price in
connection with the management of the funds, or in some cases, to the funds.
The portfolio turnover rate for each fund for the fiscal years ended February
29, 2000, February 28, 1999, and 1998, was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond 40.8% 27.2% 35.0%
California Tax-Free Money N/A N/A N/A
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free 30.9 26.9 25.0
Georgia Tax-Free Bond 48.5 19.9 49.0
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond 41.4 46.4 60.4
Maryland Tax-Free Bond 29.2 15.4 19.2
Maryland Tax-Free Money 0(a) 0(a) 0(a)
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond 50.2 25.5 34.3
New York Tax-Free Bond 77.5 55.4 55.0
New York Tax-Free Money N/A N/A N/A
Virginia Tax-Free Bond 48.1 47.3 64.3
Tax-Efficient Balanced 40.0 19.8 12.5
Tax-Efficient Growth 23.4 0(a) 0(a)
Tax-Exempt Money N/A N/A N/A
Tax-Free High Yield 57.4 38.9 24.4
Tax-Free Income 44.3 34.1 36.3
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond 47.6 24.3 56.1
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 49.7 39.9 76.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE>
(a) Prior to commencement of operations.
PRICING OF SECURITIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed income securities are generally traded in the over-the-counter market.
With the exception of the Money Funds, investments in securities are stated
at fair value using a bid-side valuation as furnished by dealers who make
markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which
considers yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity,
and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such
securities. Securities held by the Money Funds are valued at amortized cost.
There are a number of pricing services available, and the Board of
Directors/Trustees, on the basis of an ongoing evaluation of these services,
may use or may discontinue the use of any pricing service in whole or part.
Securities or other assets for which the above valuation procedures are
deemed not to reflect fair value will be appraised at prices deemed best to
reflect their fair value. Such determinations will be made in good faith by
or under the supervision of officers of each fund as authorized by the Board
of Directors/Trustees.
Tax-Efficient Funds
Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange are
valued at the last quoted sales price at the time the valuations are made. A
security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the
quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such
security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day and securities
regularly traded in the over-the-counter market are valued at the mean of the
latest bid and asked prices. Other equity securities are valued at a price
within the limits of the latest bid and asked prices deemed by the Board of
Directors/Trustees, or by persons delegated by the Board, best to reflect
fair value.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at the closing net asset value per
share of the mutual fund on the day of valuation. In the absence of a last
sale price, purchased and written options are valued at the mean of the
latest bid and asked prices, respectively.
For the purposes of determining the fund's net asset value per share, the
U.S. dollar value of all assets and liabilities initially expressed in
foreign currencies is determined by using the mean of the bid and offer
prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars quoted by a major bank.
Assets and liabilities for which the above valuation procedures are
inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value, are stated at fair
value as determined in good faith by or under the supervision of the officers
of the fund, as authorized by the Board of Directors/Trustees.
Maintenance of Money Fund's Net Asset Value Per Share at $1.00
It is the policy of the fund to attempt to maintain a net asset value of
$1.00 per share by using the amortized cost method of valuation permitted by
Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act. Under this method, securities are valued by
reference to the fund's acquisition cost as adjusted for amortization of
premium or accumulation of discount rather than by reference to their market
value. Under Rule 2a-7:
(a) The Board of Directors/Trustees must establish written procedures
reasonably designed, taking into account current market conditions and
the fund's investment objectives, to stabilize the fund's net asset value
per share, as computed for the purpose of distribution, redemption and
repurchase, at a single value;
61
<PAGE>
(b) The fund must (i) maintain a dollar-weighted average portfolio maturity
appropriate to its objective of maintaining a stable price per share,
(ii) not purchase any instrument with a remaining maturity greater than
397 days, and (iii) maintain a dollar-weighted average portfolio maturity
of 90 days or less;
(c) The fund must limit its purchase of portfolio instruments, including
repurchase agreements, to those U.S. dollar-denominated instruments which
the fund's Board of Directors/Trustees determines present minimal credit
risks, and which are eligible securities as defined by Rule 2a-7; and
(d) The Board of Directors/Trustees must determine that (i) it is in the best
interest of the fund and its shareholders to maintain a stable net asset
value per share under the amortized cost method; and (ii) the fund will
continue to use the amortized cost method only so long as the Board of
Directors/Trustees believes that it fairly reflects the market based net
asset value per share.
Although the fund believes that it will be able to maintain its net asset
value at $1.00 per share under most conditions, there can be no absolute
assurance that it will be able to do so on a continuous basis. If the fund's
net asset value per share declined, or was expected to decline, below $1.00
(rounded to the nearest one cent), the Board of Directors/Trustees of the
fund might temporarily reduce or suspend dividend payments in an effort to
maintain the net asset value at $1.00 per share. As a result of such
reduction or suspension of dividends, an investor would receive less income
during a given period than if such a reduction or suspension had not taken
place. Such action could result in an investor receiving no dividend for the
period during which he holds his shares and in his receiving, upon
redemption, a price per share lower than that which he paid. On the other
hand, if the fund's net asset value per share were to increase, or were
anticipated to increase above $1.00 (rounded to the nearest one cent), the
Board of Directors/Trustees of the fund might supplement dividends in an
effort to maintain the net asset value at $1.00 per share.
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purchase and redemption price of the fund's shares is equal to the fund's
net asset value per share or share price. The fund determines its net asset
value per share by subtracting its liabilities (including accrued expenses
and dividends payable) from its total assets (the market value of the
securities the fund holds plus cash and other assets, including income
accrued but not yet received) and dividing the result by the total number of
shares outstanding. The net asset value per share of the fund is normally
calculated as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE")
every day the NYSE is open for trading. The NYSE is closed on the following
days: New Year's Day, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday, Presidents' Day,
Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and
Christmas Day.
Determination of net asset value (and the offering, sale redemption and
repurchase of shares) for the fund may be suspended at times (a) during which
the NYSE is closed, other than customary weekend and holiday closings, (b)
during which trading on the NYSE is restricted, (c) during which an emergency
exists as a result of which disposal by the fund of securities owned by it is
not reasonably practicable or it is not reasonably practicable for the fund
fairly to determine the value of its net assets, or (d) during which a
governmental body having jurisdiction over the fund may by order permit such
a suspension for the protection of the fund's shareholders; provided that
applicable rules and regulations of the SEC (or any succeeding governmental
authority) shall govern as to whether the conditions prescribed in (b), (c),
or (d) exist.
DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless the separate account elects otherwise, the fourth quarter dividend and
capital gain distribution will be reinvested on the reinvestment date using
the NAV per share of that date. The reinvestment date normally precedes the
payment date by one day, although the exact timing is subject to change and
can be as great as 10 days.
62
<PAGE>
Unless you elect otherwise, the fund's annual capital gain distribution and,
for the Tax-Efficient Funds, the annual dividend, if any, will be reinvested
on the reinvestment date using the NAV per share of that date. The
reinvestment date may precede the payment date by as much as one day although
the exact timing is subject to change and can be as great as 10 days.
TAX STATUS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fund intends to qualify as a "regulated investment company" under
Subchapter M of the Code.
Generally, dividends paid by the funds are not eligible for the
dividends-received deduction applicable to corporate shareholders. For tax
purposes, it does not make any difference whether dividends and capital gain
distributions are paid in cash or in additional shares. Each fund must
declare by its year-end dividends equal to at least 90% of net tax-exempt
income (as of its year-end) to permit pass-through of tax-exempt income to
shareholders. Each fund must also declare dividends by December 31 of each
year equal to at least 98% of capital gains (as of October 31) in order to
avoid a federal excise tax, and distribute within 12 months 100% of taxable
income, if any, and capital gains (as of its tax year-end) to avoid federal
income tax.
At the time of your purchase, the fund's net asset value may reflect
undistributed capital gains or net unrealized appreciation of securities held
by the fund. A subsequent distribution to you of such amounts, although
constituting a return of your investment, would be taxable as a capital gain
distribution. For federal income tax purposes, the fund is permitted to carry
forward its net realized capital losses, if any, for eight years and realize
net capital gains up to the amount of such losses without being required to
pay taxes on, or distribute, such gains.
If, in any taxable year, the fund should not qualify as a regulated
investment company under the code: (i) the fund would be taxed at normal
corporate rates on the entire amount of its taxable income, if any, without
deduction for dividends or other distributions to shareholders; and (ii) the
fund's distributions to the extent made out of the fund's current or
accumulated earnings and profits would be taxable to shareholders as ordinary
dividends (regardless of whether they would otherwise have been considered
capital gain dividends).
The funds (other than Tax-Efficient Growth and Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth
Funds) may acquire bonds after initial issuance at a price less than the
principal amount of such bonds ("market discount bonds"). Gain on the
disposition of such bonds is treated as taxable ordinary income to the extent
of accrued market discount. Such gains cannot be offset by losses on the sale
of other securities but must be distributed to shareholders annually and
taxed as ordinary income.
Each year, the funds will mail you information on the tax status of dividends
and distributions.
All Funds (other than Tax-Efficient Funds)
The funds anticipate that substantially all of the dividends to be paid by
each fund will be exempt from federal income taxes. If any portion of a
fund's dividends is not exempt from federal income taxes, you will receive a
Form 1099-DIV stating the taxable portion. The funds will also advise you of
the percentage of your dividends, if any, which should be included in the
computation of alternative minimum tax. Social Security recipients who
receive interest from tax-exempt securities may have to pay taxes on a
portion of their Social Security benefit.
Because the interest on municipal securities is tax exempt, any interest on
money you borrow that is directly or indirectly used to purchase fund shares
is not deductible. (See Section 265(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.)
Further, entities or persons who are "substantial users" (or persons related
to "substantial users") of facilities financed by industrial development
bonds should consult their tax advisers before purchasing shares of a fund.
The income from such bonds may not be tax exempt for such substantial users.
63
<PAGE>
Tax-Efficient Growth and Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth Funds
A portion of the dividends paid by the funds may be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction applicable to corporate shareholders. Long-term
capital gain distributions paid from the fund is never eligible for the
dividend received deduction. For tax purposes, it does not make any
difference whether dividends and capital gain distributions are paid in cash
or in additional shares. Each fund must declare dividends by December 31 of
each year equal to at least 98% of ordinary income (as of December 31) and
capital gains (as of October 31) in order to avoid a federal excise tax and
distribute within 12 months 100% of ordinary income and capital gains (as of
its tax year-end) to avoid a federal income tax.
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
Although Florida does not have a state income tax, it does impose an
intangible personal property tax (intangibles tax) on assets, including
shares of mutual funds. This tax is based on the net asset value of shares
owned on January 1.
Under Florida law, shares of the fund will be entirely exempt from the
intangibles tax if on January 1, at least 90% of the fund's portfolio of
assets is invested in certain exempt Florida securities, U.S. government
securities, certain short-term cash investments, or other exempt securities.
If, on January 1, less than 90% of the fund's portfolio of assets is invested
in these tax-exempt securities, only that portion of a share's net asset
value represented by U.S. government securities will be exempt from the
intangibles tax. Because the fund will make every effort to have its
portfolio invested exclusively in exempt Florida municipal obligations (and
other qualifying investments) on January 1, shares of the fund should be
exempt from the intangibles tax. However, under certain circumstances, the
fund may invest in securities other than Florida municipal obligations and
there can be no guarantee that such non-exempt investments would not be in
the fund's portfolio on January 1. In such cases, all or a portion of the
value of the fund's shares may be subject to the intangibles tax, and a
portion of the fund's income may be subject to federal income taxes.
Tax-Efficient Funds
Taxation of Foreign Shareholders
The Code provides that dividends from net income will be subject to U.S. tax.
For shareholders who are not engaged in a business in the U.S., this tax
would be imposed at the rate of 30% upon the gross amount of the dividends in
the absence of a Tax Treaty providing for a reduced rate or exemption from
U.S. taxation. Distributions of net long-term capital gains realized by the
fund are not subject to tax unless the foreign shareholder is a nonresident
alien individual who was physically present in the U.S. during the tax year
for more than 182 days.
Passive Foreign Investment Companies
The fund may purchase the securities of certain foreign investment funds or
trusts called passive foreign investment companies. Such trusts have been the
only or primary way to invest in certain countries. In addition to bearing
their proportionate share of the trust's expenses (management fees and
operating expenses), shareholders will also indirectly bear similar expenses
of such trusts. Capital gains on the sale of such holdings are considered
ordinary income regardless of how long the fund held its investment. In
addition, the fund may be subject to corporate income tax and an interest
charge on certain dividends and capital gains earned from these investments,
regardless of whether such income and gains are distributed to shareholders.
To avoid such tax and interest, the fund intends to treat these securities as
sold on the last day of its fiscal year and recognize any gains for tax
purposes at that time; deductions for losses are allowable only to the extent
of any gains resulting from these deemed sales for prior taxable years. Such
gains and losses will be treated as ordinary income. The fund will be
required to distribute any resulting income even though it has not sold the
security and received cash to pay such distributions.
64
<PAGE>
Foreign Currency Gains and Losses
Foreign currency gains and losses, including the portion of gain or loss on
the sale of debt securities attributable to foreign exchange rate
fluctuations, are taxable as ordinary income. If the net effect of these
transactions is a gain, the ordinary income dividend paid by the fund will be
increased. If the result is a loss, the income dividend paid by the fund will
be decreased, or to the extent such dividend has already been paid, it may be
classified as a return of capital. Adjustments to reflect these gains and
losses will be made at the end of the fund's taxable year.
YIELD INFORMATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Money Funds
The fund's current and historical yield for a period is calculated by
dividing the net change in value of an account (including all dividends
accrued and dividends reinvested in additional shares) by the account value
at the beginning of the period to obtain the base period return. This base
period return is divided by the number of days in the period, then multiplied
by 365 to arrive at the annualized yield for that period. The fund's
annualized compound yield for such period is compounded by dividing the base
period return by the number of days in the period, and compounding that
figure over 365 days.
The Money Funds' current and compound yields for the seven days ended
February 29, 2000, were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fund Current Yield Compound Yield
---- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
California Tax-Free Money 2.19% 2.21%
New York Tax-Free Money 3.25 3.31
Tax-Exempt Money 3.36 3.41
</TABLE>
Bond Funds
An income factor is calculated for each security in the portfolio based upon
the security's market value at the beginning of the period and yield as
determined in conformity with regulations of the SEC. The income factors are
then totaled for all securities in the portfolio. Next, expenses of the fund
for the period, net of expected reimbursements, are deducted from the income
to arrive at net income, which is then converted to a per share amount by
dividing net income by the average number of shares outstanding during the
period. The net income per share is divided by the net asset value on the
last day of the period to produce a monthly yield which is then annualized.
If applicable, a taxable-equivalent yield is calculated by dividing this
yield by one minus the effective federal, state, and/or city or local income
tax rates. Quoted yield factors are for comparison purposes only, and are not
intended to indicate future performance or forecast the dividend per share of
the fund.
The yield of each fund calculated under the above-described method for the
month ended February 29, 2000, was:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond Fund 5.07%
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund 4.55
Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund 5.11
Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund 5.18
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund 4.17
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond Fund 5.16
New York Tax-Free Bond Fund 5.25
Virginia Tax-Free Bond Fund 5.15
Tax-Free High Yield Fund 5.85
Tax-Free Income Fund 5.23
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund 4.61
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund 4.48
</TABLE>
65
<PAGE>
The tax-equivalent yields (assuming a federal tax bracket of 31.0%) for each
fund for the same period were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond Fund(a) 8.10%
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund(b) 6.74
Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund(c) 7.87
Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund(d) 8.14
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund(d) 6.56
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond Fund(e) 7.99
New York Tax-Free Bond Fund(f) 8.52
Virginia Tax-Free Bond Fund(g) 7.92
Tax-Free High Yield Fund 8.48
Tax-Free Income Fund 7.58
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund 6.68
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund 6.49
---------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) Assumes a state tax bracket of 9.3%.
(b) Assumes an intangibles tax rate of 0.15%.
(c) Assumes a state tax bracket of 6.0%.
(d) Assumes a state tax bracket of 4.85% and a local tax bracket
of 2.91%.
(e) Assumes a state tax bracket of 6.37%.
(f) Assumes a state tax bracket of 6.85% and a local tax bracket
of 3.83%.
(g) Assumes a state tax bracket of 5.75%.
The tax-equivalent yields (assuming a federal tax bracket of 28.0%) for each
fund for the same period were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
California Tax-Free Bond Fund(a) 7.76%
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund(b) 6.47
Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund(c) 7.55
Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund(d) 7.80
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund(d) 6.28
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond Fund(e) 7.59
New York Tax-Free Bond Fund(f) 8.16
Virginia Tax-Free Bond Fund(g) 7.58
Tax-Free High Yield Fund 8.13
Tax-Free Income Fund 7.26
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund 6.40
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund 6.22
---------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) Assumes a state tax bracket of 9.3%.
(b) Assumes an intangibles tax rate of 0.15%.
(c) Assumes a state tax bracket of 6.0%.
(d) Assumes a state tax bracket of 4.85% and a local tax bracket
of 2.91%.
(e) Assumes a state tax bracket of 5.525%.
(f) Assumes a state tax bracket of 6.85% and a local tax bracket
of 3.83%.
(g) Assumes a state tax bracket of 5.75%.
66
<PAGE>
INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Return Performance
The fund's calculation of total return performance includes the reinvestment
of all capital gain distributions and income dividends for the period or
periods indicated, without regard to tax consequences to a shareholder in the
fund. Total return is calculated as the percentage change between the
beginning value of a static account in the fund and the ending value of that
account measured by the then current net asset value, including all shares
acquired through reinvestment of income and capital gain dividends. The
results shown are historical and should not be considered indicative of the
future performance of the fund. Each average annual compound rate of return
is derived from the cumulative performance of the fund over the time period
specified. The annual compound rate of return for the fund over any other
period of time will vary from the average.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cumulative Performance Percentage Change
1 Yr. 5 Yrs. 10 Yrs. % Since Inception
Fund ----- ------ ------- ------- ---------
---- Ended Ended Ended Inception Date
----- ----- ----- --------- ----
2/29/00 2/29/00 2/29/00 2/29/00
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <S>
California Tax-Free Bond -2.94% 30.96% 90.35% 121.47% 09/15/86
Florida Intermediate
Tax-Free -1.32 26.02 -- 38.68 03/31/93
Georgia Tax-Free Bond -3.46 30.24 -- 43.25 03/31/93
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free
Bond 1.16 21.49 -- 31.21 01/29/93
Maryland Tax-Free Bond -2.98 29.01 86.46 111.70 03/31/87
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond -4.06 28.34 -- 71.74 04/30/91
New York Tax-Free Bond -4.47 29.00 90.72 129.98 08/28/86
Virginia Tax-Free Bond -3.16 30.10 -- 72.69 04/30/91
Tax-Efficient Balanced 10.42 -- -- 45.28 06/30/97
Tax-Efficient Growth -- -- -- -- 07/30/99
Tax-Free High Yield -5.41 28.63 90.37 225.40 03/01/85
Tax-Free Income -3.42 28.82 89.99 359.19 10/26/76
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond -1.37 27.31 -- 47.24 11/30/92
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 0.67 23.58 62.00 137.67 12/23/83
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Average Annual Compound Rates of Return
1 Yr. 5 Yrs. 10 Yrs. % Since Inception
Fund ----- ------ ------- ------- ---------
---- Ended Ended Ended Inception Date
----- ----- ----- --------- ----
2/29/00 2/29/00 2/29/00 2/29/00
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <S>
California Tax-Free Bond -2.94% 5.54% 6.65% 6.09% 09/15/86
Florida Intermediate
Tax-Free -1.32 4.73 -- 4.84 03/31/93
Georgia Tax-Free Bond -3.46 5.43 -- 5.33 03/31/93
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free
Bond 1.16 3.97 -- 3.91 01/29/93
Maryland Tax-Free Bond -2.98 5.23 6.43 5.98 03/31/87
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond -4.06 5.12 -- 6.31 04/30/91
New York Tax-Free Bond -4.47 5.22 6.67 6.36 08/28/86
Virginia Tax-Free Bond -3.16 5.40 -- 6.38 04/30/91
Tax-Efficient Balanced 10.42 -- -- 15.03 06/30/97
Tax-Efficient Growth -- -- -- -- 07/30/99
Tax-Free High Yield -5.41 5.16 6.65 8.19 03/01/85
Tax-Free Income -3.42 5.20 6.63 6.75 10/26/76
Tax-Free Intermediate Bond -1.37 4.95 -- 5.48 11/30/92
Tax-Free Short-Intermediate 0.67 4.33 4.94 5.49 12/23/83
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
67
<PAGE>
Outside Sources of Information
From time to time, in reports and promotional literature: (1) the fund's
total return performance, ranking, or any other measure of the fund's
performance may be compared to any one or combination of the following: (a) a
broad-based index; (b) other groups of mutual funds, including T. Rowe Price
funds, tracked by independent research firms ranking entities, or financial
publications; (c) indices of securities comparable to those in which the fund
invests; (2) the Consumer Price Index (or any other measure for inflation,
government statistics, such as GNP may be used to illustrate investment
attributes of the fund or the general economic, business, investment, or
financial environment in which the fund operates; (3) various financial,
economic, and market statistics developed by brokers, dealers, and other
persons may be used to illustrate aspects of the fund's performance; (4) the
effect of tax-deferred compounding on the fund's investment returns, or on
returns in general in both qualified and nonqualified retirement plans or any
other tax advantage product, may be illustrated by graphs, charts, etc.; and
(5) the sectors or industries in which the fund invests may be compared to
relevant indices or surveys in order to evaluate the fund's historical
performance or current or potential value with respect to the particular
industry or sector.
Other Publications
From time to time, in newsletters and other publications issued by Investment
Services, T. Rowe Price mutual fund portfolio managers may discuss economic,
financial, and political developments in the U.S. and abroad and how these
conditions have affected or may affect securities prices or the fund;
individual securities within the fund's portfolio; and their philosophy
regarding the selection of individual stocks, including why specific stocks
have been added, removed, or excluded from the fund's portfolio.
Other Features and Benefits
The fund is a member of the T. Rowe Price family of funds and may help
investors achieve various long-term investment goals, which include, but are
not limited to, investing money for retirement, saving for a down payment on
a home, or paying college costs. To explain how the fund could be used to
assist investors in planning for these goals and to illustrate basic
principles of investing, various worksheets and guides prepared by T. Rowe
Price and/or Investment Services may be made available.
No-Load Versus Load and 12b-1 Funds
Many mutual funds charge sales fees to investors or use fund assets to
finance distribution activities. These fees are in addition to the normal
advisory fees and expenses charged by all mutual funds. There are several
types of fees charged which vary in magnitude and which may often be used in
combination. A sales charge (or "load") can be charged at the time the fund
is purchased (front-end load) or at the time of redemption (back-end load).
Front-end loads are charged on the total amount invested. Back-end loads are
charged either on the amount originally invested or on the amount redeemed.
12b-1 plans allow for the payment of marketing and sales expenses from fund
assets. These expenses are usually computed daily as a fixed percentage of
assets.
The fund is a no-load fund which imposes no sales charges or 12b-1 fees.
No-load funds are generally sold directly to the public without the use of
commissioned sales representatives. This means that 100% of your purchase is
invested for you.
68
<PAGE>
Redemptions in Kind
The fund has filed a notice of election under Rule 18f-1 of the 1940 Act.
This permits the fund to effect redemptions in kind as set forth in its
prospectus.
In the unlikely event a shareholder were to receive an in kind redemption of
portfolio securities of the fund, it would be the responsibility of the
shareholder to dispose of the securities. The shareholder would be at risk
that the value of the securities would decline prior to their sale, that it
would be difficult to sell the securities and that brokerage fees could be
incurred.
CAPITAL STOCK
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax-Efficient, Tax-Exempt Money, Tax-Free High Yield, Income, Intermediate
Bond, and Short-Intermediate Funds
Currently, the T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Funds, Inc., which consists of
three series, Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund, Tax-Efficient Growth Fund, and
Tax-Efficient Multi-Cap Growth Fund, the T. Rowe Price Tax-Exempt Money Fund,
Inc., T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Tax-Free
Income Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund, Inc., and
the T. Rowe Price Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund, Inc. are all organized as
Maryland corporations.
The fund's Charter authorizes the Board of Directors/Trustees to classify and
reclassify any and all shares which are then unissued, including unissued
shares of capital stock into any number of classes or series, each class or
series consisting of such number of shares and having such designations, such
powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations, and restrictions,
as shall be determined by the Board subject to the 1940 Act and other
applicable law. The shares of any such additional classes or series might
therefore differ from the shares of the present class and series of capital
stock and from each other as to preferences, conversions or other rights,
voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications or
terms or conditions of redemption, subject to applicable law, and might thus
be superior or inferior to the capital stock or to other classes or series in
various characteristics. The Board of Directors/Trustees may increase or
decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of
stock of any class or series that the fund has authorized to issue without
shareholder approval.
Except to the extent that the fund's Board of Directors/Trustees might
provide by resolution that holders of shares of a particular class are
entitled to vote as a class on specified matters presented for a vote of the
holders of all shares entitled to vote on such matters, there would be no
right of class vote unless and to the extent that such a right might be
construed to exist under Maryland law. The Charter contains no provision
entitling the holders of the present class of capital stock to a vote as a
class on any matter. Accordingly, the preferences, rights, and other
characteristics attaching to any class of shares, including the present class
of capital stock, might be altered or eliminated, or the class might be
combined with another class or classes, by action approved by the vote of the
holders of a majority of all the shares of all classes entitled to be voted
on the proposal, without any additional right to vote as a class by the
holders of the capital stock or of another affected class or classes.
Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each full share held (and
fractional votes for fractional shares held) and will vote in the election of
or removal of directors/trustees (to the extent hereinafter provided) and on
other matters submitted to the vote of shareholders. There will normally be
no meetings of shareholders for the purpose of electing directors/trustees
unless and until such time as less than a majority of the directors/trustees
holding office have been elected by shareholders, at which time the
directors/trustees then in office will call a shareholders' meeting for the
election of directors/trustees. Except as set forth above, the
directors/trustees shall continue to hold office and may appoint successor
directors/trustees. Voting rights are not cumulative, so that the holders of
more than 50% of the shares voting in the election of directors/trustees can,
if they choose to do so, elect all the directors/trustees of the fund, in
which event the holders of the remaining shares will be unable to elect any
person as a director/trustee. As set forth in the By-Laws of the fund, a
special
69
<PAGE>
meeting of shareholders of the fund shall be called by the Secretary of the
fund on the written request of shareholders entitled to cast at least 10% of
all the votes of the fund entitled to be cast at such meeting. Shareholders
requesting such a meeting must pay to the fund the reasonably estimated costs
of preparing and mailing the notice of the meeting. The fund, however, will
otherwise assist the shareholders seeking to hold the special meeting in
communicating to the other shareholders of the fund to the extent required by
Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act.
ORGANIZATION OF THE FUNDS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California and State Tax-Free Trusts
Currently, the T. Rowe Price California Tax-Free Income Trust consists of two
series, California Tax-Free Bond Fund and California Tax-Free Money Fund, and
the T. Rowe Price State Tax-Free Income Trust consists of eight series,
Florida Intermediate Tax-Free Fund, Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund, Maryland
Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund, Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund, New Jersey
Tax-Free Bond Fund, New York Tax-Free Bond Fund, New York Tax-Free Money
Fund, and Virginia Tax-Free Bond Fund each of which represents a separate
class of each Trust's shares and has different objectives and investment
policies.
For tax and business reasons, the Funds were organized as Massachusetts
Business Trusts, and are registered with the SEC under the 1940 Act as
diversified, open-end investment companies, commonly known as "mutual fund."
The Declaration of Trust permits the Board of Trustees to issue an unlimited
number of full and fractional shares of a single class. The Declaration of
Trust also provides that the Board of Trustees may issue additional series or
classes of shares. Each share represents an equal proportionate beneficial
interest in the fund. In the event of the liquidation of the fund, each share
is entitled to a pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund.
Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each full share held (and
fractional votes for fractional shares held) and will vote in the election of
or removal of trustees (to the extent hereinafter provided) and on other
matters submitted to the vote of shareholders. There will normally be no
meetings of shareholders for the purpose of electing trustees unless and
until such time as less than a majority of the trustees holding office have
been elected by shareholders, at which time the trustees then in office will
call a shareholders' meeting for the election of trustees. Pursuant to
Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act, holders of record of not less than two-thirds
of the outstanding shares of the fund may remove a trustee by a vote cast in
person or by proxy at a meeting called for that purpose. Except as set forth
above, the trustees shall continue to hold office and may appoint successor
trustees. Voting rights are not cumulative, so that the holders of more than
50% of the shares voting in the election of trustees can, if they choose to
do so, elect all the trustees of the Trust, in which event the holders of the
remaining shares will be unable to elect any person as a trustee. No
amendments may be made to the Declaration of Trust without the affirmative
vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Trust.
Shares have no preemptive or conversion rights; the right of redemption and
the privilege of exchange are described in the prospectus. Shares are fully
paid and nonassessable, except as set forth below. The Trust may be
terminated (i) upon the sale of its assets to another diversified, open-end
management investment company, if approved by the vote of the holders of
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Trust, or (ii) upon liquidation
and distribution of the assets of the Trust, if approved by the vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Trust. If not so
terminated, the Trust will continue indefinitely.
Under Massachusetts law, shareholders could, under certain circumstances, be
held personally liable for the obligations of the fund. However, the
Declaration of Trust disclaims shareholder liability for acts or obligations
of the fund and requires that notice of such disclaimer be given in each
agreement, obligation or instrument entered into or executed by the fund or a
Trustee. The Declaration of Trust provides for indemnification from fund
property for all losses and expenses of any shareholder held personally
liable for the obligations of the fund. Thus, the risk of a shareholder
incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to
circumstances in which the fund itself would be unable to meet its
obligations, a possibility which T. Rowe Price believes is remote. Upon
payment of any liability incurred by the fund, the shareholders of the fund
paying such liability will be entitled to reimbursement from the general
assets of the fund. The Trustees intend to conduct the operations of the fund
in such a way so as to avoid, as far as possible, ultimate liability of the
shareholders for liabilities of such fund.
70
<PAGE>
71
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL REPORT REFERENCES:
CALIFORNIA TAX- CALIFORNIA TAX- GEORGIA
FREE MONEY FREE BOND TAX-FREE
---------- --------- BOND
----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Highlights 10 11 9
9
Statement of Net Assets, February -1
29, 2000 12-16 17-24 3
Statement of Operations, year
ended
February 29, 2000 25 25 15
Statement of Changes in Net
Assets, years ended
February 29, 2000 and February
28, 1999 26 26 16
Notes to Financial Statements,
February 29, 2000 27-29 27-29 17-19
Report of Independent Accountants 30 30 20
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NEW JERSEY FLORIDA NEW YORK TAX-
TAX-FREE INTERMEDIATE FREE MONEY
BOND TAX-FREE ----------
---- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Highlights 8 8 10
Statement of Net Assets, February
29, 2000 9-14 9-12 11-14
Statement of Operations, year ended
February 29, 2000 15 13 22
Statement of Changes in Net Assets,
years ended
February 29, 2000 and February 28,
1999 16 14 23
Notes to Financial Statements,
February 29, 2000 17-19 15-17 24-26
Report of Independent Accountants 20 18 27
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NEW YORK VIRGINIA
TAX-FREE BOND TAX-FREE
------------- BOND
----
<S> <C> <C>
Financial Highlights 11 10
Statement of Net Assets, February 29, 2000 16-21 14-20
Statement of Operations, year ended
February 29, 2000 22 21
Statement of Changes in Net Assets, years ended
February 29, 2000 and February 28, 1999 23 22
Notes to Financial Statements, February 29, 2000 24-26 23-25
Report of Independent Accountants 27 26
</TABLE>
72
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARYLAND MARYLAND
SHORT-TERM TAX-FREE BOND
TAX-FREE BOND -------------
-------------
<S> <C> <C>
Financial Highlights 10 11
Statement of Net Assets, February 29, 2000 12-16 17-28
Statement of Operations, year ended
February 29, 2000 29 29
Statement of Changes in Net Assets, years ended
February 29, 2000 and February 28, 1999 30 30
Notes to Financial Statements, February 29, 2000 31-33 31-33
Report of Independent Accountants 34 34
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TAX-EXEMPT TAX-FREE HIGH TAX-FREE
MONEY YIELD INCOME
----- ----- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Highlights 2 2 2
Statement of Net Assets, February 29,
2000 4-16 3-23 3-21
Statement of Operations, year ended
February 29, 2000 17 24 22
Statement of Changes in Net Assets,
years ended
February 29, 2000 and February 28, 1999 18 25 23
Notes to Financial Statements, February
29, 2000 19-21 26-28 24-26
Report of Independent Accountants 22 29 27
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TAX-FREE TAX-EFFICIENT TAX-FREE SHORT-
INTERMEDIATE BALANCED INTERMEDIATE
BOND -------- ------------
----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Highlights 2 17 2
Statement of Net Assets,
February 29, 2000 3-9 19-30 3-11
Statement of Operations, year
ended
February 29, 2000 10 38 12
Statement of Changes in Net
Assets, years ended
February 29, 2000 and February
28, 1999 11 39 13
Notes to Financial Statements,
February 29, 2000 12-14 40-43 14-16
Report of Independent 1
Accountants 5 44 17
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TAX-EFFICIENT
GROWTH
------
<S> <C>
Financial Highlights 18
Portfolio of Investments, February 29, 2000 31-36
Statement of Assets and Liabilities, February 29, 2000 37
Statement of Operations, period from July 30, 1999
(commencement of operations) to February 29, 2000 38
Statement of Changes in Net Assets, period from July 30, 1999
(commencement of operations) to February 29, 2000 39
Notes to Financial Statements, February 29, 2000 40-43
Report of Independent Accountants 44
</TABLE>
73
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TAX-EXEMPT
MONEY FUND-
PLUS CLASS
----------
<S> <C>
Financial Highlights 3
Statement of Net Assets, February 29, 2000 4-16
Statement of Operations, year ended
February 29, 2000 17
Statement of Changes in Net Assets, years ended
February 29, 2000 and February 28, 1999 18
Notes to Financial Statements, February 29, 2000 19-21
Report of Independent Accountants 22
</TABLE>
RATINGS OF MUNICIPAL DEBT SECURITIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
Aaa-Bonds rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the
smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as "gilt
edge."
Aa-Bonds rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together
with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally know as high-grade bonds.
A-Bonds rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be
considered as upper medium-grade obligations.
Baa-Bonds rated Baa are considered as medium-grade obligations, i.e., they
are neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments and
principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective
elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any
great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics
and in fact have speculative characteristics as well.
Ba-Bonds rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements: their futures
cannot be considered as well assured. Often the protection of interest and
principal payments may be very moderate and thereby not well safeguarded
during both good and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position
characterize bonds in this class.
B-Bonds rated B generally lack the characteristics of a desirable investment.
Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms
of the contract over any long period of time may be small.
Caa-Bonds rated Caa are of poor standing. Such issues may be in default or
there may be present elements of danger with respect to principal or
interest.
Ca-Bonds rated Ca represent obligations which are speculative in a high
degree. Such issues are often in default or have other marked short-comings.
C-Bonds rated C represent the lowest-rated, and have extremely poor prospects
of attaining investment standing.
Standard & Poor's Corporation
AAA-This is the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's to a debt
obligation and indicates an extremely strong capacity to pay principal and
interest.
AA-Bonds rated AA also qualify as high-quality debt obligations. Capacity to
pay principal and interest is very strong.
74
<PAGE>
A-Bonds rated A have a strong capacity to pay principal and interest,
although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes
in circumstances and economic conditions.
BBB-Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay
principal and interest. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection
parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more
likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay principal and interest for bonds
in this category than for bonds in the A category.
BB, B, CCC, CC, C-Bonds rated BB, B, CCC, CC, and C are regarded on balance,
as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer's capacity to pay
interest and repay principal. BB indicates the lowest degree of speculation
and C the highest degree of speculation. While such bonds will likely have
some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large
uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions.
D-In default.
Fitch IBCA, Inc.
AAA-High grade, broadly marketable, suitable for investment by trustees and
fiduciary institutions, and liable to slight market fluctuation other than
through changes in the money rate. The prime feature of a "AAA" bond is the
showing of earnings several times or many times interest requirements for
such stability of applicable interest that safety is beyond reasonable
question whenever changes occur in conditions. Other features may enter, such
as wide margin of protection through collateral, security or direct lien on
specific property. Sinking funds or voluntary reduction of debt by call or
purchase are often factors, while guarantee or assumption by parties other
than the original debtor may influence their rating.
AA-Of safety virtually beyond question and readily salable. Their merits are
not greatly unlike those of "AAA" class but a bond so rated may be junior
though of strong lien, or the margin of safety is less strikingly broad. The
issue may be the obligation of a small company, strongly secured, but
influenced as to rating by the lesser financial power of the enterprise and
more local type of market.
A-Bonds rated A are considered to be investment grade and of high credit
quality. The obligor's ability to pay interest and repay principal is
considered to be strong, but may be more vulnerable to adverse changes in
economic conditions and circumstances than bonds with higher ratings.
BBB-Bonds rated BBB are considered to be investment grade and of satisfactory
credit quality. The obligor's ability to pay interest and repay principal is
considered to be adequate. Adverse changes in economic conditions and
circumstances, however, are more likely to have adverse impact on these
bonds, and therefore impair timely payment. The likelihood that the ratings
of these bonds will fall below investment grade is higher than for bonds with
higher ratings.
BB, B, CCC, CC, and C are regarded on balance as predominantly speculative
with respect to the issuer's capacity to repay interest and repay principal
in accordance with the terms of the obligation for bond issues not in
default. BB indicates the lowest degree of speculation and C the highest
degree of speculation. The rating takes into consideration special features
of the issue, its relationship to other obligations of the issuer, and the
current and prospective financial condition and operating performance of the
issuer.
RATINGS OF MUNICIPAL NOTES AND VARIABLE RATE SECURITIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. VMIG1/MIG-1 the best quality. VMIG2/MIG-2
high quality, with margins of protection ample though not so large as in the
preceding group. VMIG3/MIG-3 favorable quality, with all security elements
accounted for, but lacking the undeniable strength of the preceding grades.
Market access for refinancing, in particular, is likely to be less well
established. VMIG4/MIG-4 adequate quality but there is specific risk.
75
<PAGE>
Standard & Poor's Corporation SP-1 very strong or strong capacity to pay
principal and interest. Those issues determined to possess overwhelming
safety characteristics will be given a plus (+) designation. SP-2
satisfactory capacity to pay interest and principal. SP-3 speculative
capacity to pay principal and interest.
Fitch IBCA, Inc. F-1+ exceptionally strong credit quality, strongest degree
of assurance for timely payment. F-1 very strong credit quality. F-2 good
credit quality, having a satisfactory degree of assurance for timely payment.
F-3 fair credit quality, assurance for timely payment is adequate but adverse
changes could cause the securities to be rated below investment grade. F-5
weak credit quality, having characteristics suggesting a minimal degree of
assurance for timely payment.
RATINGS OF COMMERCIAL PAPER
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. P-1 superior capacity for repayment. P-2
strong capacity for repayment. P-3 acceptable capacity for repayment of
short-term promissory obligations.
Standard & Poor's Corporation A-1 highest category, degree of safety
regarding timely payment is strong. Those issues determined to possess
extremely strong safety characteristics are denoted with a plus sign (+)
designation. A-2 satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest. A-3
adequate capacity for timely payment, but are vulnerable to adverse effects
of changes in circumstances than higher-rated issues. B and C speculative
capacity to pay principal and interest.
Fitch IBCA, Inc. F-1+ exceptionally strong credit quality, strongest degree
of assurance for timely payment. F-1 very strong credit quality. F-2 good
credit quality, having a satisfactory degree of assurance for timely payment.
F-3 fair credit quality, assurance for timely payment is adequate but adverse
changes could cause the securities to be rated below investment grade. F-5
weak credit quality, having characteristics suggesting a minimal degree of
assurance for timely payment.
76
<PAGE>
PAGE 3
PART C
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 23. EXHIBITS
(a)(1) Declaration of Trust of Registrant, dated June 13, 1986 (filed with
Amendment No. 1)
(a)(2) Amendment No. 1 to Master Trust Agreement, dated August 1, 1986 (filed
with Amendment No. 1)
(a)(3) Amendment No. 2 to Master Trust Agreement, dated January 21, 1987 (filed
with Amendment No. 2)
(a)(4) Amendment No. 3 to Master Trust Agreement, dated February 13, 1991
(filed with Amendment No. 10)
(a)(5) Amendment No. 4 to Master Trust Agreement, dated December 22, 1992
(filed with Amendment No. 16)
(a)(6) Amendment No. 5 to Master Trust Agreement, dated January 28, 1993 (filed
with Amendment No. 18)
(a)(7) Amendment No. 6 to Master Trust Agreement, dated November 25, 1994
(electronically filed with Amendment No. 25)
(a)(8) Amendment No. 7 to Master Trust Agreement, dated October 27, 1998
(electronically filed with Amendment No. 35)
(a)(9) Amendment No. 8 to Master Trust Agreement, dated November 5,
1999(electronically filed with Amendment No. 35)
(a)(10) Amendment No. 9 to Master Trust Agreement, dated __________, 2001 (to be
filed by Amendment).
(b) By-Laws of Registrant, dated July 23, 1986, as amended to January 21,
1987
(c) Specimen Stock Certificate for Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund (filed with
Amendment No. 4)
(d)(1) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
Maryland Tax-Free Bond Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
(electronically filed with Amendment No. 30)
(d)(2) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
New York Tax-Free Money Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
(electronically filed with
<PAGE>
PAGE 4
Amendment No. 30)
(d)(3) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
New York Tax-Free Bond Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
(electronically filed with Amendment No. 30)
(d)(4) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
Virginia Tax-Free Bond Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (filed
with Amendment No. 11)
(d)(5) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
New Jersey Tax-Free Bond Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (filed
with Amendment No. 11)
(d)(6) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates,
Inc. (filed with Amendment No. 17)
(d)(7) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
Georgia Tax-Free Bond Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (filed
with Amendment No. 19)
(d)(8) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
Florida Insured Intermediate Tax-Free Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates,
Inc. (filed with Amendment No. 19)
(d)(9) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
Virginia Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates
(electronically filed with Amendment No. 25)
(d)(10) Investment Management Agreement between the Registrant on behalf of the
Maryland Tax-Free Money Fund and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (to be
filed by Amendment)
(e) Underwriting Agreement between Registrant and T. Rowe Price Investment
Services, Inc. (electronically filed with Amendment No. 30)
(f) Inapplicable
(g) Custody Agreements
(g)(1) Custodian Agreement between T. Rowe Price Funds and State Street Bank
and Trust Company, dated January 28, 1998, as amended November 4, 1998,
April 21, 1999, February 9,
<PAGE>
PAGE 5
2000, April 19, 2000, July 18, 2000, and October 25, 2000 (to be filed
by Amendment)
(h) Other Agreements
(h)(1) Transfer Agency and Service Agreement between T. Rowe Price Services,
Inc. and T. Rowe Price Funds, dated January 1, 2000, as amended
February 9, 2000, April 19, 2000, July 18, 2000, and October 25, 2000
(to be filed by Amendment)
(h)(2) Agreement between T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and T. Rowe Price
Funds for Fund Accounting Services, dated January 1, 2000, as amended
February 9, 2000, April 19, 2000, July 18, 2000, and October 25, 2000
(to be filed by Amendment)
(i) Opinion of Counsel (to be filed by Amendment)
(j) Consent of Independent Accountants
(k) Inapplicable
(l) Inapplicable
(m) Inapplicable
(n) Inapplicable
(p) Code of Ethics, dated March 1, 2000 (to be filed by Amendment)
(q) Inapplicable
(r) Inapplicable
(s) Inapplicable
(t) Other Exhibits
(i) Power of Attorney
ITEM 24. PERSONS CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL WITH REGISTRANT
None
ITEM 25. INDEMNIFICATION
The Registrant maintains comprehensive Errors and Omissions and
Officers and Directors insurance policies written by
<PAGE>
PAGE 6
the Evanston Insurance Company and ICI Mutual. These policies provide coverage
for T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. ("Manager"), and its subsidiaries and
affiliates as listed in Item 26 of this Registration Statement (with the
exception of the T. Rowe Price Associates Foundation, Inc.), and all other
investment companies in the T. Rowe Price family of mutual funds. In addition to
the corporate insureds, the policies also cover the officers, directors, and
employees of the Manager, its subsidiaries, and affiliates. The premium is
allocated among the named corporate insureds in accordance with the provisions
of Rule 17d-1(d)(7) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Article VI, Section 6.4 of the Registrant's Master Trust Agreement
provides as follows:
SECTION 6.4. INDEMNIFICATION OF TRUSTEES, OFFICERS, ETC. The Trust
shall indemnify (from the assets of the Sub-Trust or Sub-Trusts in question)
each of its Trustees and officers (including persons who serve at the Trust's
request as directors, officers or trustees of another organization in which the
Trust has any interest as a shareholder, creditor or otherwise [ hereinafter
referred to as a "Covered Person" ]) against all liabilities, including but not
limited to amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments, in compromise or as fines
and penalties, and expenses, including reasonable accountants' and counsel fees,
incurred by any Covered Person in connection with the defense or disposition of
any action, suit or other proceeding, whether civil or criminal, before any
court or administrative or legislative body, in which such Covered Person may be
or may have been involved as a party or otherwise or with which such person may
be or may have been threatened, while in office or thereafter, by reason of
being or having been such a Trustee or officer, director or trustee, except with
respect to any matter as to which it has been determined that such Covered
Person (i) did not act in good faith in the reasonable belief that such Covered
Person's action was in or not opposed to the best interests of the Trust or (ii)
had acted with willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless
disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Covered Person's office
(either and both of the conduct described in (i) and (ii) being referred to
hereafter as "Disabling Conduct"). A determination that the Covered Person is
entitled to indemnification may be made by (i) a final decision on the merits by
a court or other body before whom the proceeding was brought that the person to
be indemnified was not liable by reason of Disabling Conduct, (ii) dismissal of
a court action or an administrative proceeding against a Covered Person for
insufficiency of evidence of Disabling Conduct, or (iii) a reasonable
determination, based upon a review of the facts, that the indemnitee was not
liable by reason of Disabling Conduct by (a) a vote of a majority of a quorum of
Trustees who are neither "interested persons" of the Trust as defined in section
2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act nor parties to the
<PAGE>
PAGE 7
proceeding, or (b) an independent legal counsel in a written opinion. Expenses,
including accountants' and counsel fees so incurred by any such Covered Person
(but excluding amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments, in compromise or as
fines or penalties), may be paid from time to time by the Sub-Trust in question
in advance of the final disposition of any such action, suit or proceeding,
provided that the Covered Person shall have undertaken to repay the amounts so
paid to the Sub-Trust in question if it is ultimately determined that
indemnification of such expenses is not authorized under this Article VI and (i)
the Covered Person shall have provided security for such undertaking, (ii) the
Trust shall be insured against losses arising by reason of any lawful advances,
or (iii) a majority of a quorum of the disinterested Trustees who are not a
party to the proceeding, or an independent legal counsel in a written opinion,
shall have determined, based on a review of readily available facts (as opposed
to a full trial-type inquiry), that there is reason to believe that the Covered
Person ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification.
Section 6.6 of the Registrant's Master Trust Agreement provides as
follows:
SECTION 6.6 INDEMNIFICATION NOT EXCLUSIVE, ETC. The right of
indemnification provided by this Article VI shall not be exclusive of or affect
any other rights to which any such Covered Person may be entitled. As used in
this Article VI, "Covered Person" shall include such person's heirs, executors
and administrators, an "interested Covered Person" is one against whom the
action, suit or other proceeding in question or another action, suit or other
proceeding on the same or similar grounds is then or has been pending or
threatened, and a "disinterested" person is a person against whom none of such
actions, suits or other proceedings or another action, suit or other proceeding
on the same or similar grounds is then or has been pending or threatened.
Nothing contained in this article shall affect any rights to indemnification to
which personnel of the Trust, other than Trustees and officers, and other
persons may be entitled by contract or otherwise under law, nor the power of the
Trust to purchase and maintain liability insurance on behalf of any such person.
Article III, Section 3.2(l) of the Registrant's Master Trust Agreement
provides as follows:
SECTION 3.2(L) INSURANCE. To purchase and pay for entirely out of Trust
property such insurance as they may deem necessary or appropriate for the
conduct of the business, including, without limitation, insurance policies
insuring the assets of the Trust and payment of distributions and principal on
its portfolio investments, and insurance policies insuring the
<PAGE>
PAGE 8
Shareholders, Trustees, officers, employees, agents, consultants, investment
advisers, managers, administrators, distributors, principal underwriters, or
independent contractors, or any thereof (or any person connected therewith), of
the Trust individually against all claims and liabilities of every nature
arising by reason of holding, being or having held any such office or position,
or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted by any such
person in any such capacity, including any action taken or omitted that may be
determined to constitute negligence, whether or not the Trust would have the
power to indemnify such person against such liability.
Insofar as indemnification for liability under the Securities Act of
1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.
ITEM 26. BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS OF INVESTMENT MANAGER
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., ("GROUP") owns 100% of the stock of T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc. Group was formed in 2000 as a holding company for the T.
Rowe Price affiliated companies.
T. Rowe Price International, Inc. (formerly Rowe Price-Fleming
International, Inc.), a Maryland corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of T.
Rowe Price Associates, Inc. T. Rowe Price International, Inc. ("T. ROWE PRICE
INTERNATIONAL") was incorporated in Maryland in 2000 to provide investment
counsel service with respect to foreign securities for institutional investors
in the United States. In addition to managing private counsel client accounts,
T. Rowe Price International also sponsors registered investment companies which
invest in foreign securities, serves as general partner of T. Rowe Price
International Partners, Limited Partnership, and provides investment advice to
the T. Rowe Price Trust Company, trustee of the International Common Trust Fund.
<PAGE>
PAGE 9
T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. ("INVESTMENT SERVICES"), a
wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., was incorporated in
Maryland in 1980 for the specific purpose of acting as principal underwriter and
distributor for the Investment Companies which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
sponsors and serves as investment adviser (the "PRICE FUNDS"). Investment
Services also serves as distributor for any proprietary variable annuity
products. Investment Services is registered as a broker-dealer under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is a member of the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. In 1984, Investment Services expanded its activities to
include a brokerage service.
TRP Distribution, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Investment
Services, was incorporated in Maryland in 1991. It was organized for, and
engages in, the sale of certain investment related products prepared by
Investment Services and T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services.
T. Rowe Price Associates Foundation, Inc. (the "FOUNDATION"), was
incorporated in 1981 (and is not a subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates,
Inc.). The Foundation's overall objective emphasizes various community needs by
giving to a broad range of educational, civic, cultural, and health-related
institutions. The Foundation has a very generous matching gift program whereby
employee gifts designated to qualifying institutions are matched according to
established guidelines.
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. ("PRICE SERVICES"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., was incorporated in Maryland in
1982 and is registered as a transfer agent under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Price Services provides transfer agent, dividend disbursing, and certain
other services, including shareholder services, to the Price Funds.
T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. ("RPS"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., was incorporated in Maryland in
1991 and is registered as a transfer agent under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. RPS provides administrative, record keeping, and sub accounting services
to administrators of employee benefit plans.
T. Rowe Price Trust Company ("TRUST COMPANY"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., is a Maryland-chartered
limited-service trust company, organized in 1983 for the purpose of providing
fiduciary services. The Trust Company serves as trustee and/or custodian of
certain qualified and non-qualified employee benefit plans, individual
retirement accounts, and common trust funds.
<PAGE>
PAGE 10
T. Rowe Price Investment Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in
Maryland in 1996. A wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.,
it owns the technology rights, hardware, and software of T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc. and affiliated companies and provides technology services to
them.
TRPH Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc., was organized in 1997 to acquire an interest in a UK-based
corporate finance advisory firm.
T. Rowe Price Threshold Fund Associates, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., was incorporated in Maryland in
1994 and serves as the general partner of T. Rowe Price Threshold Fund III,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.
T. Rowe Price Threshold Fund III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership,
was organized in 1994 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and invests in private
financings of small companies with high growth potential; Threshold Fund
Associates, Inc. is the General Partner of the partnership.
T. Rowe Price Stable Asset Management, Inc. ("STABLE ASSET
MANAGEMENT"), was incorporated in Maryland in 1988 as a wholly owned subsidiary
of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. Stable Asset Management is registered as an
investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and specializes in
the management of investment portfolios which seek stable investment returns
through the use of guaranteed investment contracts, bank investment contracts,
structured investment contracts issued by insurance companies and banks, as well
as short-term fixed income securities.
T. Rowe Price Recovery Fund Associates, Inc., a Maryland corporation,
is a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. organized in 1988
for the purpose of serving as General Partner of T. Rowe Price Recovery Fund,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership which invests in financially distressed
companies.
T. Rowe Price Recovery Fund II Associates, L.L.C., is a Maryland
limited liability company (with T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and T. Rowe Price
Trust Company as its members) organized in 1996 to serve as General Partner of
T. Rowe Price Recovery Fund II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership which also
invests in financially distressed companies.
T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. ("TRP CANADA") is a Maryland corporation
organized in 1988 as a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
This entity is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940 as
<PAGE>
PAGE 11
well as with the Ontario Securities Commission to provide advisory services to
individual and institutional clients residing in Canada.
T. Rowe Price Insurance Agency, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., organized in Maryland in 1994 and licensed to do
business in several states to act primarily as a distributor of proprietary
variable annuity products.
Since 1983, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. has organized several
distinct Maryland limited partnerships, which are informally called the Pratt
Street Ventures partnerships, for the purpose of acquiring interests in
growth-oriented businesses.
TRP Suburban, Inc., is a Maryland corporation organized in 1990 as a
wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. It entered into
agreements with McDonogh School and CMANE-McDonogh-Rowe Limited Partnership to
construct an office building in Owings Mills, Maryland, which currently houses
T. Rowe Price Associates' transfer agent, plan administrative services,
retirement plan services, and operations support functions.
TRP Suburban Second, Inc., a wholly owned Maryland subsidiary of T.
Rowe Price Associates, Inc., was incorporated in 1995 to primarily engage in the
development and ownership of real property located in Owings Mills, Maryland.
TRP Finance, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc., is a Delaware corporation organized in 1990 to manage certain
passive corporate investments and other intangible assets.
T. Rowe Price Strategic Partners Fund II, L.P. ("STRATEGIC PARTNERS
FUNDS") is a Delaware limited partnership organized in 1992, for the purpose of
investing in small public and private companies seeking capital for expansion or
undergoing a restructuring of ownership. The general partner of T. Rowe Price
Strategic Partners Fund II, L.P. is T. Rowe Price Strategic Partners II, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership whose general partner is T. Rowe Price Strategic
Partners Associates, Inc.
T. Rowe Fleming Asset Management Limited ("T. ROWE FLEMING"), an
English corporation, is an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940. T. Rowe Fleming will provide investment management services to Japanese
investment trusts and other institutional investors in Japan pursuant to one or
more delegation agreements entered into between Daiwa SB Investments, Ltd. and
T. Rowe Fleming. T. Rowe Fleming is a corporate joint venture owned 50% by T.
Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and 50% by Robert Fleming Asset Management Limited,
a wholly-owned subsidiary
<PAGE>
PAGE 12
of Robert Fleming Holdings Limited. Formerly known as Fleming International
Asset Management Limited ("FIAM"), the company changed its name to T. Rowe
Fleming Asset Management Limited on June 8, 1999, following the formation of the
joint venture.
Listed below are the directors, executive officers and managing
directors of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. who have other substantial businesses,
professions, vocations, or employment aside from their association with T. Rowe
Price Group, Inc.:
DIRECTORS OF T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC.
JAMES E. HALBKAT, JR., Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Mr. Halbkat is
President of U.S. Monitor Corporation, a provider of public response systems.
Mr. Halbkat's address is: P.O. Box 23109, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina
29925.
DONALD B. HEBB, JR., Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Mr. Hebb is the
managing general partner of ABS Capital Partners. Mr. Hebb's address is One
South Street, 25th Floor, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.
RICHARD L. MENSCHEL, Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Mr. Menschel is a
limited partner of The Goldman Sachs Group, L.P., an investment banking firm.
Mr. Menschel's address is: 85 Broad Street, 2nd Floor, New York, New York 10004.
ROBERT L. STRICKLAND, Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Mr. Strickland
retired as Chairman of Lowe's Companies, Inc., a retailer of specialty home
supplies, as of January 31, 1998 and continues to serve as a Director. He is a
Director of Hannaford Bros., Co., a food retailer; and Krispy Kreme Doughnuts,
Inc. Mr. Strickland's address is: 2000 W. First Street, Suite 604,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104.
ANNE MARIE WHITTEMORE, Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Mrs. Whittemore is
a partner of the law firm of McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe L.L.P. and a
Director of Owens & Minor, Inc.; Fort James Corporation; and Albemarle
Corporation. Mrs. Whittemore's address is: One James Center, Richmond, Virginia
23219.
All of the following directors of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. are employees of T.
Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
EDWARD C. BERNARD, Director and Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Director and President of T. Rowe Price
Insurance Agency, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.; Director of
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Vice President of TRP Distribution, Inc.
<PAGE>
PAGE 13
HENRY H. HOPKINS, Director and Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.;
Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Director of T. Rowe Price
Insurance Agency, Inc.; Vice President and Director of T. Rowe Price (Canada),
Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., T.
Rowe Price Threshold Fund Associates, Inc., T. Rowe Price Trust Company, TRP
Distribution, Inc., and TRPH Corporation; Director of T. Rowe Price Insurance
Agency, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price International, T. Rowe Price Real
Estate Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price
Stable Asset Management, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Strategic Partners Associates,
Inc.
JAMES A.C. KENNEDY, Director and Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; President and Director of T. Rowe Price
Strategic Partners Associates, Inc.; Director and Vice President of T. Rowe
Price Threshold Fund Associates, Inc.
JOHN H. LAPORTE, JR., Director and Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.; Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
WILLIAM T. REYNOLDS, Director and Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board of T. Rowe Price
Stable Asset Management, Inc.; Director of TRP Finance, Inc.
JAMES S. RIEPE, Vice-Chairman of the Board, Director, and Managing Director of
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director and Managing Director of T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board and President of T. Rowe Price Trust
Company; Chairman of the Board of T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc., T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Technologies, Inc., T. Rowe
Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Director
of T. Rowe Price International, T. Rowe Price Insurance Agency, Inc., and TRPH
Corporation; Director and President of TRP Distribution, Inc., TRP Suburban
Second, Inc., and TRP Suburban, Inc.; and Director and Vice President of T. Rowe
Price Stable Asset Management, Inc.
GEORGE A. ROCHE, Chairman of the Board, President, Director, and Managing
Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; President, Director and Managing Director
of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of the Board of TRP Finance, Inc.;
Director of T. Rowe Price International, T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services,
Inc., and T. Rowe Price Strategic Partners, Inc., and Director and Vice
President of T. Rowe Price Threshold Fund Associates, Inc., TRP Suburban Second,
Inc., and TRP Suburban, Inc.
<PAGE>
PAGE 14
BRIAN C. ROGERS, Director and Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.;
Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe
Price Trust Company.
M. DAVID TESTA, Vice Chairman of the Board, Director, and Managing Director of
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director, Chief Investment Officer, and Managing
Director of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Director, T. Rowe Price
International; President and Director of T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc.; Director
and Vice President of T. Rowe Price Trust Company; and Director of TRPH
Corporation.
MARTIN G. WADE, Director and Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.;
Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Chairman of T. Rowe Price
International.
ADDITIONAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
MICHAEL A. GOFF, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Director and the President of T. Rowe Price Investment
Technologies, Inc.
CHARLES E. VIETH, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Director and President of T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan
Services, Inc.; Director and Vice President of T. Rowe Price Investment
Services, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price
(Canada), Inc., T. Rowe Price Trust Company, and TRP Distribution, Inc.
ADDITIONAL MANAGING DIRECTORS OF T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC. AND T. ROWE PRICE
ASSOCIATES, INC.
PRESTON G. ATHEY, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.
BRIAN W.H. BERGHUIS, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.
STEPHEN W. BOESEL, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price Trust Company.
JOHN H. CAMMACK, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price Investment Services,
Inc. and T. Rowe Price Trust Company.
GREGORY A. McCRICKARD, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T.
Rowe Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price Trust Company.
MARY J. MILLER, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc.
<PAGE>
PAGE 15
CHARLES A. MORRIS, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.
NANCY M. MORRIS, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price International, T. Rowe
Price Investment Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Stable Asset Management,
Inc.; Director and Vice President of T. Rowe Price Savings Bank and T. Rowe
Price Trust Company.
GEORGE A. MURNAGHAN, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Executive Vice President of T. Rowe Price International;
Vice President of T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. and T. Rowe Price
Trust Company.
MARIA NALYWAYKO, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.
EDMUND M. NOTZON III, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price Trust Company.
WAYNE D. O'MELIA, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Director and President of T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.;
Vice President of T. Rowe Price Trust Company.
LARRY J. PUGLIA, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc.
JOHN R. ROCKWELL, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Director and Senior Vice President of T. Rowe Price
Retirement Plan Services, Inc.; Director and Vice President of T. Rowe Price
Stable Asset Management, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Vice President of
T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
R. TODD RUPPERT, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; President and Director of TRPH Corporation; Vice
President of T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. and T. Rowe Price
Trust Company.
ROBERT W. SMITH, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price International.
WILLIAM J. STROMBERG, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.
<PAGE>
PAGE 16
MARK J. VASELKIV, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price Recovery Fund
Associates, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Recovery Fund II Associates, L.L.C.
RICHARD T. WHITNEY, Managing Director of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc.; Vice President of T. Rowe Price International and T.
Rowe Price Trust Company.
Certain directors and officers of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc. are also officers and/or directors of one or more of the
Price Funds and/or one or more of the affiliated entities listed herein.
See also "Management of Fund," in Registrant's Statement of Additional
Information.
ITEM 27. PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITERS
(a) The principal underwriter for the Registrant is Investment Services.
Investment Services acts as the principal underwriter for the T. Rowe
Price family of mutual funds, including the following investment
companies: T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price New
Horizons Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price New Era Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price
New Income Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc., T. Rowe
Price Tax-Free Income Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Tax-Exempt Money Fund,
Inc., T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc., T. Rowe Price Growth &
Income Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund,
Inc., T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price High
Yield Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield Fund, Inc., T. Rowe
Price New America Growth Fund, T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund, T.
Rowe Price GNMA Fund, T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund, T. Rowe
Price California Tax-Free Income Trust, T. Rowe Price State Tax-Free
Income Trust, T. Rowe Price Science & Technology Fund, Inc., T. Rowe
Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc., Institutional International Funds,
Inc., T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Funds, Inc., T. Rowe Price Index
Trust, Inc., T. Rowe Price Spectrum Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Balanced
Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Short-Term U.S. Government Fund, Inc., T.
Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock
Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund, Inc., T.
Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Summit Funds, Inc., T. Rowe Price Summit
Municipal Funds, Inc., T. Rowe Price Equity Series, Inc., T. Rowe Price
International Series, Inc., T. Rowe Price Fixed Income Series, Inc., T.
Rowe Price Personal Strategy Funds, Inc., T. Rowe Price Value Fund,
Inc., T. Rowe Price Capital Opportunity Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price
Corporate Income Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund, Inc.,
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund, Inc., Institutional Equity Funds,
Inc., T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price
Diversified Small-Cap Growth Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient
Funds, Inc., Reserve Investment Funds, Inc., T. Rowe Price Media &
Telecommunications Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund, Inc., T.
Rowe Price Developing Technologies Fund, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Global
Technology Fund, Inc., T. Rowe Price U.S. Bond Index Fund, Inc., and T.
Rowe Price International Index Fund, Inc.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME POSITIONS AND POSITIONS AND
OFFICES WITH OFFICES WITH
UNDERWRITER REGISTRANT
<C> <S> <S>
James S. Riepe Chairman of the Board Vice President
and Director and Trustee
Edward C. Bernard President and Director None
Henry H. Hopkins Vice President and Director Vice President
Charles E. Vieth Vice President and Director None
Patricia M. Archer Vice President None
Steven J. Banks Vice President None
John T. Bielski Vice President None
Darrell N. Braman Vice President None
Ronae M. Brock Vice President None
Meredith C. Callanan Vice President None
John H. Cammack Vice President None
Ann R. Campbell Vice President None
Christine M. Carolan Vice President None
Joseph A. Carrier Vice President None
Laura H. Chasney Vice President None
Renee M. Christoff Vice President None
Christopher W. Dyer Vice President None
Christine S. Fahlund Vice President None
Forrest R. Foss Vice President None
Thomas A. Gannon Vice President None
Andrea G. Griffin Vice President None
Douglas E. Harrison Vice President None
David J. Healy Vice President None
Joanne M. Healey Vice President None
Joseph P. Healy Vice President None
Walter J. Helmlinger Vice President None
Valerie King Vice President None
-Calloway
Eric G. Knauss Vice President None
Sharon R. Krieger Vice President None
Steven A. Larson Vice President None
Jeanette M. LeBlanc Vice President None
Keith W. Lewis Vice President None
Gayle A. Lomax Vice President None
Sarah McCafferty Vice President None
Mark J. Mitchell Vice President None
Nancy M. Morris Vice President None
George A. Murnaghan Vice President None
Steven E. Norwitz Vice President None
Kathleen M. O'Brien Vice President None
Barbara A. O'Connor Vice President None
Wayne D. O'Melia Vice President None
David Oestr Vice President None
e
icher
Robert Petrow Vice President None
Pamela D. Preston Vice President None
George D. Riedel Vice President None
John R. Rockwell Vice President None
Kenneth J. Rutherford Vice President None
Alexander Savich Vice President None
Kristin E. Seeberger Vice President None
Donna B. Singer Vice President None
Bruce D. Stewart Vice President None
William W. Strickland, Jr. Vice President None
Jerome Tuccille Vice President None
Walter Wdowiak Vice President None
William F. Wendler II Vice President None
Jane F. White Vice President None
Thomas R. Woolley Vice President None
Barbara A. O'Connor Controller None
Theodore J. Zamerski III Assistant Vice President and None
Assistant Controller
Matthew B. Alsted Assistant Vice President None
Kimberly B. Andersen Assistant Vice President None
Richard J. Barna Assistant Vice President None
Catherine L.Berkenkemper Assistant Vice President None
Edwin J. Brooks Assistant Vice President None
III
Carl A. Cox Assistant Vice President None
Charles R. Dicken Assistant Vice President None
Cheryl L. Emory Assistant Vice President None
John A. Galateria Assistant Vice President None
Janelyn A. Healey Assistant Vice President None
Sandra J. Kiefler Assistant Vice President None
Suzanne M. Knoll Assistant Vice President None
Patricia Assistant Vice President Secretary
B
.
Lippert
Teresa M. Loeffert Assistant Vice President None
C. Lillian Matthews Assistant Vice President None
Janice D. McCrory Assistant Vice President None
Danielle Assistant Vice President None
Nicholson
Smith
JeanneMarie B. Patella Assistant Vice President None
Kylelane Purcell Assistant Vice President None
David A. Roscum Assistant Vice President None
Carole H. Smith Assistant Vice President None
John A. Stranovsky Assistant Vice President None
Nolan L. North Assistant Treasurer None
Barbara A. Van Horn Secretary None
</TABLE>
(c) Not applicable. Investment Services will not receive any compensation
with respect to its activities as underwriter for the Price Funds since
the Price Funds are sold on a no-load basis.
ITEM 28. LOCATION OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS
All accounts, books, and other documents required to be maintained by
the Registrant under Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the
rules thereunder will be maintained by the Registrant at its offices at 100 East
Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. Transfer, dividend disbursing, and
shareholder service activities are performed by T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., at
4515 Painters Mill Road, Owings Mills, Maryland 21117. Custodian activities for
the Registrant are performed at State Street Bank and Trust Company's Service
Center (State Street South), 1776 Heritage Drive, Quincy, Massachusetts 02171.
ITEM 29. MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Registrant is not a party to any management-related service contract,
other than as set forth in the Prospectus or Statement of Additional
Information.
ITEM 30. UNDERTAKINGS
(a) Not applicable
<PAGE>
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Registrant has duly
caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, duly authorized, in the City of Baltimore, State of Maryland, this
January 12, 2001.
T. Rowe Price State Tax-Free Income Trust
/s/William T. Reynolds
By: William T. Reynolds
Chairman of the Board
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in
the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/William T. Reynolds Chairman of the Board January 12, 2001
William T. Reynolds (Chief Executive Officer)
/s/Joseph A. Carrier Treasurer (Chief January 12, 2001
Joseph A. Carrier Financial Officer)
* Trustee January 12, 2001
Calvin W. Burnett
* Trustee January 12, 2001
Anthony W. Deering
* Trustee January 12, 2001
F. Pierce Linaweaver
/s/James S. Riepe Trustee and January 12, 2001
James S. Riepe Vice President
* Trustee January 12, 2001
John G. Schreiber
/s/M. David Testa Trustee January 12, 2001
M. David Testa
/s/ Trustee January 12, 2001
*Henry H. Hopkins Attorney-In-Fact January 12, 2001
