<PAGE>
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON NOVEMBER 20, 1998
REGISTRATION NO. 333-
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------------
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------------
INFORMIX CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
DELAWARE 7372 94-3011736
(State or other jurisdiction (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
of Classification Code No.) Identification
incorporation or organization) Number)
</TABLE>
4100 BOHANNON DRIVE
MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
(650) 926-6300
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)
------------------------------
JEAN-YVES DEXMIER
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
INFORMIX CORPORATION
4100 BOHANNON DRIVE
MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
(650) 926-6300
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
------------------------------
COPIES TO:
DOUGLAS H. COLLOM, ESQ. DANIEL E. O'CONNOR, ESQ.
JEFFREY A. HERBST, ESQ. DAVID T. YOUNG, ESQ.
RONALD A. BAKER, ESQ. PAUL G. MARTINO, ESQ.
MARK A. CLAWSON, ESQ. Gunderson Dettmer Stough
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian, LLP
Professional Corporation 155 Constitution Drive
650 Page Mill Road Menlo Park, California 94025
Palo Alto, California 94304-1050 (650) 321-2400
(650) 493-9300
------------------------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: AS SOON AS
PRACTICABLE AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND THE
SATISFACTION OR WAIVER OF CERTAIN CONDITIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF
REORGANIZATION DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING THE APPROVAL OF SUCH AGREEMENT BY THE
STOCKHOLDERS OF RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. / /
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. / /
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. / /
------------------------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPOSED PROPOSED
AMOUNT MAXIMUM MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF TO BE OFFERING PRICE AGGREGATE REGISTRATION
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED REGISTERED(1) PER UNIT(2) OFFERING PRICE(2) FEE
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share.... 8,043,057 $5.50 $44,236,814 $12,298
</TABLE>
(1) Represents the estimated maximum number of shares of the common stock of the
Registrant, $0.01 par value per share, issuable in connection with the
merger of the Registrant and Red Brick Systems, Inc. ("Red Brick") described
herein, based upon an exchange ratio of 0.6 shares of the Registrant's
common stock issuable upon the conversion of each share of common stock of
Red Brick, $0.0001 par value per share (a "Red Brick Share"), outstanding at
the time of the consummation of the merger described herein. Specifically,
the estimate is based upon 12,586,500 Red Brick Shares outstanding on
November 19, 1998, and 818,595 Red Brick Shares reserved for issuance upon
the exercise of currently outstanding stock options to purchase such shares
that may be exercised between the date of the initial filing of this
Registration Statement and the anticipated date of the consummation of the
merger.
(2) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457(f)(1) and Section 6(b) under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). The proposed maximum offering price
is based on the average of the high and low sales prices of the Registrant's
common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on November 17, 1998.
------------------------------
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a),
MAY DETERMINE.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
[LOGO]
485 ALBERTO WAY
LOS GATOS,
CALIFORNIA 95032
November , 1998
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders of Red
Brick Systems, Inc. to be held on:
Wednesday, December 30, 1998 at 10:00 a.m.
at Hyatt Rickeys
4219 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, California
THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT SPECIAL MEETING THAT AFFECTS YOUR INVESTMENT IN RED
BRICK.
At this meeting you will be asked to vote on a merger agreement pursuant to
which Red Brick would be merged with a subsidiary of Informix Corporation. In
the merger, Informix will issue to Red Brick stockholders 0.6 of a share of
Informix common stock for each share of Red Brick common stock held by them. Red
Brick and Informix intend the exchange of Red Brick common stock for Informix
common stock (other than cash paid for fractional shares) to be tax-free to Red
Brick stockholders for federal income tax purposes.
Your board of directors has approved the merger, has determined that the
merger agreement and the merger are in your best interests and unanimously
recommends that you vote to approve the merger agreement at the special meeting.
The merger agreement is attached to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus
as Annex A. We encourage you to read the merger agreement.
In reaching this determination, your board of directors received the written
opinion of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated that the exchange ratio described
above was fair, from a financial point of view, to you as of the date of its
opinion. A copy of this opinion is attached to the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex B.
We have enclosed a notice of special meeting and a proxy
statement/prospectus discussing the proposed merger and the merger agreement. We
encourage you to read these documents carefully. Also enclosed is a proxy card
so you can vote on the merger agreement without attending the meeting. PLEASE
COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT TO US AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE IN THE POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE WE HAVE PROVIDED. If you decide to
attend the special meeting, you may vote your shares in person whether or not
you have mailed us a proxy.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
CHRISTOPHER G. ERICKSON
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE RED BRICK SPECIAL
MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE YOUR PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY
IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE. YOUR PROXY MAY BE WITHDRAWN BY YOU AT
ANY TIME BEFORE IT IS VOTED. EXECUTED BUT UNMARKED PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR
APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE MERGER. PLEASE DO NOT SEND
ANY RED BRICK STOCK CERTIFICATES IN YOUR PROXY ENVELOPE.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
[LOGO]
485 ALBERTO WAY
LOS GATOS,
CALIFORNIA 95032
NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 30, 1998 AT 10:00 A.M.
AT HYATT RICKEYS
4219 EL CAMINO REAL
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA
------------------------
The board of directors of Red Brick Systems, Inc. asks you to attend this
important special meeting to vote on the following:
1. A merger agreement pursuant to which Red Brick would be merged with a
subsidiary of Informix Corporation. In the merger, Informix will
issue to Red Brick stockholders 0.6 of a share of Informix common
stock for each share of Red Brick common stock held by them; and
2. Any other business as may properly come before the special meeting or
any postponement or adjournment.
Your board of directors has determined that the merger agreement and the
merger are in your best interests and recommends that you vote to approve the
merger agreement at the meeting.
Only stockholders of record of Red Brick common stock at the close of
business on November 19, 1998 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
special meeting or any adjournments or postponements. A list of such
stockholders will be available for inspection at Red Brick's headquarters
located at 485 Alberto Way, Los Gatos, California during ordinary business hours
for the ten-day period prior to the special meeting. The merger cannot be
completed unless holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Red Brick
common stock on the record date affirmatively vote to approve the merger
agreement.
Accompanying this notice is a proxy statement/prospectus discussing the
proposed merger and the merger agreement. We encourage you to read this document
carefully. Also enclosed is a proxy card so you can vote on the merger agreement
without attending the meeting. PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY
CARD AND RETURN IT TO US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IN THE POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE WE
HAVE PROVIDED. If you decide to come to the special meeting, you may vote your
shares in person whether or not you have mailed us a proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Kristi L. Smith
KRISTI L. SMITH
Secretary
Los Gatos, California
Dated: November , 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE RED BRICK SPECIAL
MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE YOUR PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY
IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE. YOUR PROXY MAY BE WITHDRAWN BY YOU AT
ANY TIME BEFORE IT IS VOTED. EXECUTED BUT UNMARKED PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR
APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE MERGER. PLEASE DO NOT SEND
ANY RED BRICK STOCK CERTIFICATES IN YOUR PROXY ENVELOPE.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE
CHANGED. INFORMIX MAY NOT ISSUE THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION
STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS
NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR
SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED NOVEMBER 20, 1998
[RED BRICK LOGO] [INFORMIX LOGO]
PROXY STATEMENT PROSPECTUS
OF OF
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC. INFORMIX CORPORATION
FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS UP TO 8,043,057 SHARES OF
TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 30, 1998 COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01
The board of directors of Red Brick Systems, Inc. has approved a merger
agreement that would merge Red Brick with a subsidiary of Informix Corporation.
In the merger, Informix will issue to Red Brick stockholders 0.6 shares of
Informix common stock for each share of Red Brick common stock held by them. We
intend the exchange of Red Brick common stock for Informix common stock (other
than cash paid for fractional shares) to be tax-free to Red Brick stockholders
for federal income tax purposes.
Your board of directors has determined that the merger agreement and the
merger are in your best interests and recommends that you vote to approve the
merger agreement at the special meeting described below.
A special meeting for Red Brick stockholders to vote on the merger agreement
has been scheduled for:
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 30, 1998 AT 10:00 A.M.
AT HYATT RICKEYS
4219 EL CAMINO REAL
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA
Only stockholders who held their shares of Red Brick common stock at the
close of business on November 19, 1998 will be entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements. The merger
cannot be completed unless holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Red Brick common stock on the record date affirmatively vote to approve the
merger agreement.
INFORMIX COMMON STOCK IS LISTED ON THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET UNDER THE
SYMBOL "IFMX." RED BRICK COMMON STOCK IS LISTED ON THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET
UNDER THE SYMBOL "REDB."
This document gives you detailed information about the proposed merger. We
encourage you to read this entire document carefully. Please see "Where You Can
Find More Information" on page 29 for additional information about Informix and
Red Brick on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 7 FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS
THAT YOU SHOULD CONSIDER IN DETERMINING HOW TO VOTE ON THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
REGULATOR HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE INFORMIX COMMON STOCK TO BE ISSUED IN
THE MERGER OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE OR
ADEQUATE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proxy statement/prospectus is dated November , 1998, and was first mailed
to stockholders on November , 1998.
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
---------
<S> <C>
SUMMARY.................................................................................................... 1
The Companies............................................................................................ 1
The Merger............................................................................................... 1
What Red Brick Stockholders Will Receive in the Merger................................................... 1
Risks of the Merger...................................................................................... 1
The Special Meeting...................................................................................... 2
Record Date for Voting on the Merger Agreement........................................................... 2
Stockholder Vote Required to Approve the Merger Agreement................................................ 2
Voting Agreements........................................................................................ 2
Red Brick Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation to Red Brick Stockholders............................... 2
Opinion of Financial Advisor to Red Brick................................................................ 2
Other Interests of Red Brick Officers and Directors in the Merger........................................ 2
Conditions to the Merger................................................................................. 3
No Solicitation.......................................................................................... 3
Termination of the Merger Agreement...................................................................... 3
Informix Stock Option.................................................................................... 3
Regulatory Approvals..................................................................................... 3
Accounting Treatment..................................................................................... 3
Important Federal Income Tax Consequences................................................................ 3
No Appraisal Rights...................................................................................... 3
Comparative Per Share Data and Market Price Information.................................................. 3
Listing of Informix Common Stock......................................................................... 4
Forward-Looking Statements May Prove Inaccurate.......................................................... 4
Who Can Help Answer Your Questions....................................................................... 4
Summary Consolidated Historical Financial Data........................................................... 5
RISK FACTORS............................................................................................... 7
Risks Related to the Merger.............................................................................. 7
Risks Relating to Informix............................................................................... 9
Risks Relating to Red Brick.............................................................................. 19
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION........................................................................ 29
TRADEMARKS................................................................................................. 29
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MAY PROVE INACCURATE............................................................ 30
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA............................................................ 31
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA................................................................................. 33
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION...................................................................... 34
Informix................................................................................................. 34
Red Brick................................................................................................ 34
Recent Share Prices...................................................................................... 34
Stockholders............................................................................................. 35
Dividends................................................................................................ 35
THE RED BRICK SPECIAL MEETING.............................................................................. 36
General.................................................................................................. 36
Record Date and Outstanding Shares....................................................................... 36
</TABLE>
i
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
---------
<S> <C>
Voting of Proxies........................................................................................ 36
Quorum Required.......................................................................................... 37
Vote Required............................................................................................ 37
Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes............................................................................ 38
Solicitation of Proxies and Expenses..................................................................... 38
THE PLAN OF MERGER AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS................................................................ 39
Material Contacts and Board Deliberations................................................................ 39
Reasons for the Merger................................................................................... 41
Recommendation of the Red Brick Board.................................................................... 43
Opinion of Financial Advisor to Red Brick................................................................ 43
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger............................................................... 47
Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations................................................................ 50
No Appraisal Rights...................................................................................... 51
THE MERGER AGREEMENT....................................................................................... 52
The Merger............................................................................................... 52
Effective Time........................................................................................... 52
Conversion of Shares in the Merger....................................................................... 52
Assumption of Stock Options.............................................................................. 53
Effect of the Merger..................................................................................... 53
Representations and Warranties........................................................................... 53
Conduct of Informix's and Red Brick's Business Prior to the Merger....................................... 54
No Solicitation.......................................................................................... 56
Conditions to the Merger................................................................................. 57
Termination of the Merger Agreement...................................................................... 59
Fees and Expenses........................................................................................ 60
Related Agreements....................................................................................... 60
OTHER RELATED MATTERS...................................................................................... 63
Governmental and Regulatory Approvals.................................................................... 63
Accounting Treatment..................................................................................... 63
Nasdaq National Market Quotation......................................................................... 63
Restrictions on Resale of Informix Common Stock.......................................................... 63
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS OF INFORMIX AND RED BRICK............................................. 64
BUSINESS OF INFORMIX....................................................................................... 67
Overview................................................................................................. 67
Products................................................................................................. 67
Services, Consulting and Customer Support................................................................ 70
Marketing and Customers.................................................................................. 71
Licensing................................................................................................ 71
Product Development...................................................................................... 72
Competition.............................................................................................. 73
Intellectual Property.................................................................................... 74
Legal Proceedings........................................................................................ 75
Facilities............................................................................................... 79
Employees................................................................................................ 80
INFORMIX MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS............. 81
Overview................................................................................................. 81
</TABLE>
ii
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
---------
<S> <C>
Results of Operations for Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 and September 28, 1997.................... 85
Results of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................................... 93
Liquidity and Capital Resources.......................................................................... 104
Disclosures About Market Rate Risk....................................................................... 108
Year 2000 Compliance..................................................................................... 110
European Monetary Conversion............................................................................. 113
Recent Developments...................................................................................... 113
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE....................... 114
INFORMIX MANAGEMENT........................................................................................ 116
Executive Officers and Directors......................................................................... 116
Board of Directors Meetings and Committees............................................................... 120
Director Compensation.................................................................................... 121
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.............................................. 121
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act........................................................ 121
Executive Compensation................................................................................... 122
Stock Option Repricing................................................................................... 126
Employment Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements................................................. 128
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification Matters..................................................... 130
Stock Plans.............................................................................................. 130
INFORMIX STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT....................................... 135
INFORMIX CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS.............................................................................. 137
DESCRIPTION OF INFORMIX CAPITAL STOCK...................................................................... 140
General.................................................................................................. 140
Common Stock............................................................................................. 140
Preferred Stock.......................................................................................... 141
Registration Rights...................................................................................... 142
Antitakeover Effects of Provisions of Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws; Rights Agreement.......... 143
Effect of Delaware Antitakeover Statute.................................................................. 144
Transfer Agent........................................................................................... 144
BUSINESS OF RED BRICK...................................................................................... 145
Overview................................................................................................. 145
Industry Background...................................................................................... 145
Solution................................................................................................. 146
Products................................................................................................. 148
Technology............................................................................................... 150
Customers and Markets.................................................................................... 152
Sales and Marketing...................................................................................... 152
Maintenance and Services................................................................................. 153
Research and Development................................................................................. 153
Competition.............................................................................................. 155
Intellectual Property and Other Proprietary Rights....................................................... 155
Employees................................................................................................ 156
Properties............................................................................................... 156
Legal Proceedings........................................................................................ 157
</TABLE>
iii
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
---------
<S> <C>
RED BRICK MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS............ 158
Overview................................................................................................. 158
Results of Operations for Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 and 1997.................................. 159
Results of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................................... 164
Liquidity and Capital Resources.......................................................................... 167
Year 2000 Compliance..................................................................................... 168
RED BRICK MANAGEMENT....................................................................................... 170
Executive Officers and Directors......................................................................... 170
Board of Directors Meetings and Committees............................................................... 172
Director Compensation.................................................................................... 172
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.............................................. 172
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act........................................................ 173
Executive Compensation................................................................................... 173
Employment Contracts and Change in Control Arrangements.................................................. 176
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification............................................................. 176
Stock Plans.............................................................................................. 176
RED BRICK STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT...................................... 179
RED BRICK CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS............................................................................. 181
DESCRIPTION OF RED BRICK CAPITAL STOCK..................................................................... 182
Common Stock............................................................................................. 182
Preferred Stock.......................................................................................... 182
Rights Agreement......................................................................................... 182
Antitakeover Effects of Provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware Law.................. 183
Registration Rights...................................................................................... 184
Transfer Agent and Registrar............................................................................. 184
LEGAL MATTERS.............................................................................................. 185
EXPERTS.................................................................................................... 185
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS................................................................. F-1
Consolidated Financial Statements of Informix............................................................ F-2
Consolidated Financial Statements of Red Brick........................................................... F-48
ANNEX A-- AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION BY AND AMONG INFORMIX CORPORATION, IC MERGER CORPORATION AND
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC., DATED AS OF OCTOBER 7, 1998
ANNEX B-- OPINION OF MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INCORPORATED, DATED OCTOBER 7, 1998
</TABLE>
iv
<PAGE>
SUMMARY
THIS SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS SELECTED INFORMATION FROM THIS DOCUMENT AND MAY NOT
CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU. TO UNDERSTAND THE
PROPOSED MERGER FULLY AND FOR A MORE COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE TERMS OF THE
PROPOSED MERGER, YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT AND THE DOCUMENTS
WE HAVE REFERRED YOU TO. SEE "WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION" (PAGE 29).
THE MERGER AGREEMENT IS ATTACHED AS ANNEX A TO THIS DOCUMENT. WE ENCOURAGE YOU
TO READ THE MERGER AGREEMENT. IT IS THE LEGAL DOCUMENT THAT GOVERNS THE PROPOSED
MERGER.
THE COMPANIES (PAGES 67 AND 145)
INFORMIX CORPORATION
4100 Bohannon Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: 650-926-6300
Informix Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, markets and supports
relational database management systems (RDBMS), object-relational database
management systems (ORDBMS), as well as related connectivity and development
products. Organizations commonly use RDBMS software for storing, managing and
retrieving very large amounts of data. RDBMS software simplifies the data
retrieval process by allowing multiple individual users, with different
application software, to access and manage the same data simultaneously without
corrupting the underlying database.
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
485 Alberto Way
Los Gatos, California 95032
Telephone: 408-399-3200
Red Brick Systems, Inc. designs, develops, markets and supports data
warehousing software. Red Brick's products allow an enterprise to load very
large amounts of data into separate databases that can be used to conduct
complex analytical queries without affecting the organization's transaction
processing systems. Red Brick's flagship product, Red Brick Warehouse, is a
client/server RDBMS software product specifically designed for data warehousing
applications. Red Brick's second major product, Red Brick Formation, was
introduced in September 1998. Customers will use Red Brick Formation to take
data from transaction processing and legacy data sources and prepare it for use
in a data warehouse.
THE MERGER (PAGE 52)
Informix, Red Brick and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Informix, have entered
into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated October 7, 1998. This merger
agreement is attached as Annex A at the back of this proxy statement/prospectus.
The merger agreement proposes that Red Brick merge with a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Informix and thereby become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Informix.
We encourage you to read the merger agreement as it is the legal document that
governs the proposed merger.
WHAT RED BRICK STOCKHOLDERS WILL RECEIVE IN THE MERGER (PAGE 52)
Upon completion of the merger, Informix will issue to Red Brick stockholders
0.6 shares of Informix common stock for each share of Red Brick common stock
that they own.
Red Brick stockholders will not receive fractional shares. Instead, they
will receive a check in payment for any fractional share.
DO NOT SEND IN YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATES NOW. WHEN THE MERGER IS COMPLETED,
INFORMIX WILL SEND YOU WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXCHANGING YOUR STOCK
CERTIFICATES.
RISKS OF THE MERGER (PAGE 7)
In considering whether to approve the merger agreement, you should consider
all of the risks of the merger, including the risk of fluctuations in the market
price of Informix common stock and the fact that Informix may not successfully
combine Red Brick's business with its own following the merger. WE ENCOURAGE YOU
TO READ ALL OF THE RISKS SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS BEGINNING
ON PAGE 7.
1
<PAGE>
THE SPECIAL MEETING (PAGE 36)
Red Brick will hold a special meeting of stockholders on Wednesday, December
30, 1998 at 10:00 a.m. at Hyatt Rickeys, 4219 El Camino Real, Palo Alto,
California. At the special meeting, Red Brick stockholders will be asked to
approve the merger agreement and the merger.
RECORD DATE FOR VOTING ON THE MERGER AGREEMENT (PAGE 36)
You are entitled to vote at the special meeting if you owned shares of Red
Brick common stock as of the close of business on November 19, 1998, the record
date. On the record date, there were 12,586,500 shares of Red Brick common stock
outstanding. Red Brick stockholders will have one vote at the special meeting
for each share of Red Brick common stock they owned on the record date.
STOCKHOLDER VOTE REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT (PAGE 37)
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of Red Brick common stock is required to approve the merger agreement.
Therefore, your abstention or failure to vote will have the effect of a vote
against the merger agreement. Informix stockholders will not vote on the merger
agreement.
VOTING AGREEMENTS (PAGE 61)
As of September 30, 1998, the directors and executive officers of Red Brick
owned 1,433,278 shares of Red Brick common stock (including shares which can be
acquired upon stock option exercises within 60 days of September 30, 1998),
which represented approximately 11.1% of the outstanding shares of Red Brick
common stock. Each of the directors and executive officers of Red Brick have
entered into a voting agreement granting Informix a proxy to vote all of their
shares of Red Brick common stock for the approval of the merger agreement.
RED BRICK REASONS FOR THE MERGER; RECOMMENDATION TO RED BRICK STOCKHOLDERS (PAGE
42)
The Red Brick board of directors has determined that the terms of the merger
and the merger agreement are in the best interests of Red Brick and its
stockholders. In reaching its decision, the Red Brick board of directors
identified several potential benefits of the merger. Red Brick and Informix
believe that following the merger they will be able to offer customers more
comprehensive database management software solutions and address a broader range
of customer needs. The Red Brick board of directors also considered that Red
Brick stockholders would have the opportunity to participate in the potential
growth of Informix and Red Brick following the merger. However, the Red Brick
board of directors also recognized that the potential benefits of the merger may
not be realized and that there are a number of other risks related to the
merger. See "Risk Factors--Risks Related to the Merger" at page 7.
THE RED BRICK BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF
THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO RED BRICK (PAGE 43 AND ANNEX B)
In deciding to approve the merger, Red Brick's board of directors considered
an opinion dated October 7, 1998 from its financial advisor, Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated. The Morgan Stanley opinion stated that the exchange ratio was
fair on such date, from a financial point of view, to Red Brick stockholders.
This opinion is attached as Annex B to this document. WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO READ
THE ENTIRE MORGAN STANLEY OPINION.
OTHER INTERESTS OF RED BRICK OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS IN THE MERGER (PAGE 47)
In considering the Red Brick board of directors' recommendation that you
vote to approve the merger agreement, you should note that the officers and
directors of Red Brick have interests in the merger that are different from, or
in addition to, your interests. Specifically, as a result of the merger, (1) one
director and the officers of
2
<PAGE>
Red Brick may receive severance payments, (2) the directors and officers of Red
Brick may receive accelerated vesting of stock options and (3) the directors and
officers of Red Brick will receive continuing indemnification against
liabilities. As a result, Red Brick's directors and officers could be more
likely to vote to approve the merger agreement than Red Brick stockholders
generally.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER (PAGE 57)
The merger will not be completed unless the conditions contained in the
merger agreement are met, including the approval of the merger agreement by Red
Brick stockholders. Some of these conditions may be waived by the company
entitled to assert the condition.
NO SOLICITATION (PAGE 56)
Red Brick has agreed, subject to some exceptions contained in the merger
agreement, not to initiate or engage in discussions with another party regarding
a business combination with that party while the merger is pending.
TERMINATION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT (PAGE 59)
Red Brick and Informix may together agree to terminate the merger agreement
without completing the merger. This is the case whether or not Red Brick
stockholders have approved the merger agreement. In addition, either company may
terminate the merger agreement if the merger is not completed on or before April
30, 1999 or if specified events occur before that date.
INFORMIX STOCK OPTION (PAGE 60)
In connection with the merger agreement, Red Brick granted Informix a stock
option to purchase up to 19.9% of Red Brick's outstanding common stock at $2.40
per share. If the merger agreement is terminated in connection with Red Brick's
pursuit of an acquisition agreement with a third party or Red Brick's failure to
hold the special meeting in a timely fashion, Informix will be able to exercise
the stock option. However, Informix may not receive more than $2 million in
profit as a result of the option.
REGULATORY APPROVALS (PAGE 63)
The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended,
prohibits Red Brick and Informix from completing the merger until after they
have furnished certain information and materials to the Antitrust Division of
the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission and a required
waiting period has ended. Both Red Brick and Informix furnished the required
information. The waiting period ends on November 25, 1998.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT (PAGE 63)
Red Brick and Informix intend the merger to be accounted for as a purchase.
IMPORTANT FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES (PAGE 50)
Red Brick and Informix intend the exchange of Red Brick common stock for
Informix common stock (other than cash paid for fractional shares) to be
tax-free to Red Brick stockholders for federal income tax purposes.
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to you from the
merger will depend on your own circumstances. You should consult your tax
advisors for a full understanding of all of the tax consequences to you from the
merger.
NO APPRAISAL RIGHTS (PAGE 51)
Under Delaware law, Red Brick stockholders do not have any right to an
appraisal of the value of their Red Brick common stock in connection with the
merger.
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA AND MARKET PRICE INFORMATION (PAGES 33 AND 34)
Shares of Informix common stock and Red Brick common stock are both quoted
on the Nasdaq Stock Market's National Market. On October 7, 1998, the last
trading day before the announcement of the proposed merger, Red Brick common
stock closed at $2.19 per share and Informix common stock closed at $4.00 per
share. On November , 1998, the latest practicable trading day before the
printing of this proxy statement/prospectus, Red Brick common
3
<PAGE>
stock closed at $ per share and Informix common stock closed at $ per
share.
LISTING OF INFORMIX COMMON STOCK (PAGE 63)
The shares of Informix common stock issued in connection with the merger
will be listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market's National Market.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MAY PROVE INACCURATE (PAGE 30)
Each of Red Brick and Informix has made forward-looking statements in this
document that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements
include expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. When we
use words such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates" or similar expressions,
we are making forward-looking statements. For more information regarding factors
that could cause actual results to differ from these expectations, you should
refer to "Risk Factors" on page 7.
WHO CAN HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
If you have questions about the merger you should contact:
Red Brick Investor Relations
485 Alberto Way
Los Gatos, California 95032
Telephone: (408) 399-7962
Attention: Rebecca Kreps
4
<PAGE>
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
Informix derived its information from the audited financial statements of
Informix for the years 1993 through 1997 and the unaudited financial statements
as of and for the nine months ended September 28, 1997 and September 30, 1998.
Red Brick derived its information from the audited financial statements of Red
Brick for the years 1993 through 1997 and the unaudited financial statements as
of and for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998. This information
is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with each company's
historical consolidated financial statements (and related notes) contained in
this document.
INFORMIX CORPORATION
(In Thousands, Except for Per Share Data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
-----------------------------
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 28, DECEMBER 31,
------------- ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------------- ------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS DATA:
Net revenues...... $520,411 $ 482,613 $ 663,892 $ 734,540 $ 636,547 $ 451,969 $353,115
Operating income
(loss).......... 35,663 (373,709) (355,742) (61,326) 68,725 77,229 83,925
Net income
(loss).......... 33,144 (366,061) (356,867) (73,565) 38,600 48,293 54,989
Basic earnings
(loss) per
share........... $ 0.18 $ (2.41) $ (2.36) (0.49) $ 0.27 $ 0.35 $ 0.42
Diluted earnings
(loss) per
share........... $ 0.17 $ (2.41) $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.26 $ 0.34 $ 0.40
Shares used to
compute basic
earnings (loss)
per share....... 165,711 151,708 151,907 149,310 145,062 137,742 130,534
Shares used to
compute diluted
earnings (loss)
per share....... 171,406 151,708 151,907 149,310 150,627 142,782 137,827
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash, cash
equivalents and
short-term
investments..... $156,414 $ 155,465 $ 261,120 $ 253,209 $ 194,153 $144,383
Working capital
(deficit)....... (14,398) (140,148) 3,137 163,594 184,867 157,017
Total assets...... 538,344 563,244 881,988 682,445 447,769 328,001
Long-term
obligations..... 4,467 6,311 2,359 2,846 892 451
Stockholders'
equity.......... 126,634 59,064 325,304 357,747 269,400 207,581
</TABLE>
5
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(In Thousands, Except for Per Share Data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
------------------------ -----------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
DATA:
Total revenues.......... $ 25,156 $ 28,623 $ 43,315 $ 36,035 $ 20,605 $ 8,502 $ 2,564
Income (loss) from
operations............ (15,585) (19,626) (18,717) 1,537 579 (1,416) (2,862)
Net income (loss)....... (15,006) (18,437) (18,023) 3,818 308 (1,481) (2,935)
Basic earnings (loss)
per share(1).......... $ (1.20) $ (1.61) $ (1.55) $ 0.37 $ 0.22 n/a n/a
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share(1).......... $ (1.20) $ (1.61) $ (1.55) $ 0.30 $ 0.04 n/a n/a
Shares used to compute
basic earnings (loss)
per share(1).......... 12,473 11,463 11,663 10,357 1,407 n/a n/a
Shares used to compute
diluted earnings
(loss) per share
(1)................... 12,473 11,463 11,663 12,643 8,635 n/a n/a
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash, cash equivalents
and short-term
investments........... $ 17,132 $ 26,909 $ 35,151 $ 2,998 $ 1,958 $ 2,747
Working capital......... 11,681 26,132 40,308 2,613 1,554 3,553
Total assets............ 29,170 43,565 53,368 10,977 6,510 4,887
Long-term obligations... 21 60 396 1,068 1,131 194
Total stockholders'
equity................ 16,017 29,482 42,924 3,720 2,262 3,741
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Prior to 1995, statement of operations data omit the historical net income
per share, as it was not presented in the initial public offering
registration statement pursuant to SEC guidelines. Pro forma net income per
share is presented for 1995. Amounts for 1996 and 1995 have been restated to
comply with FAS 128 and SAB 98.
6
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW BEFORE VOTING ON THE
MERGER AGREEMENT AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES DESCRIBED
BELOW ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES FACING RED BRICK AND INFORMIX. ADDITIONAL RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES NOT PRESENTLY KNOWN TO US OR THAT WE DO NOT BELIEVE ARE IMPORTANT
TO AN INVESTOR MAKING A DECISION WHETHER TO INVEST IN INFORMIX SECURITIES MAY
ALSO HARM OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS.
IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS ACTUALLY OCCUR, OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL
CONDITION OR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COULD BE SERIOUSLY HARMED. IN SUCH CASE, THE
TRADING PRICE OF INFORMIX COMMON STOCK COULD DECLINE, AND YOU MAY LOSE ALL OR
PART OF YOUR INVESTMENT.
THIS PROSPECTUS ALSO CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS
AND UNCERTAINTIES. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE
ANTICIPATED IN THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF CERTAIN FACTORS,
INCLUDING THE RISKS FACED BY US DESCRIBED BELOW AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS
PROSPECTUS.
RISKS RELATED TO THE MERGER
INTEGRATION OF RED BRICK INTO INFORMIX'S BUSINESS
Informix and Red Brick may not achieve the intended benefits of the merger
if Informix is unable to combine successfully Red Brick's business with its own.
Informix could encounter the following difficulties:
- Retaining Red Brick customers;
- Marketing and distributing Red Brick products;
- Operating Red Brick's business more efficiently; and
- Retaining key Red Brick employees.
For example, Red Brick's customers could cancel or delay product orders if they
are uncertain about Informix's commitment to support Red Brick products. Red
Brick's distributors could cancel or refuse to renew contracts with Red Brick.
The difficulty of bringing together personnel from different corporate cultures
could result in less efficient business operations. In addition, key Red Brick
employees may not accept employment with Informix.
These and other problems resulting from the merger could divert the
attention of Informix's management and harm Informix's business.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY RED BRICK PERSONNEL
The merger could lead to the loss of certain key Red Brick employees. Red
Brick's contribution to the combined company's future performance will depend in
part on the continued service of key groups of Red Brick personnel. The loss of
a substantial portion of Red Brick's consultants, developers, system engineers
or customer support personnel could seriously harm the combined company's
business.
COSTS OF THE MERGER
The merger will result in estimated total transaction costs of approximately
$1.0 million to Informix and $3.6 million to Red Brick. The actual transaction
costs may be much larger. In addition to these transaction costs, Informix
expects to incur other costs after the merger that should not exceed $10
million. These include severance benefits and facilities closures that will be
recorded in the allocation of the purchase price of the merger, as appropriate.
Informix expects that expenses related to the write-off of Red Brick in-process
research and development should not exceed 15% of the value of the
7
<PAGE>
merger. If the merger does not close, Informix and Red Brick will have incurred
costs for which they have received no benefits.
FIXED EXCHANGE RATIO
In the merger, Informix will exchange 0.6 of a share of Informix common
stock for each outstanding share of Red Brick common stock. The exchange ratio
is fixed and will not change if the market price of either Informix common stock
or Red Brick common stock changes. As a result, Red Brick's stockholders will
not be compensated if the market price of Informix common stock decreases before
the merger. If the market price of Informix common stock declines before the
merger, including the period between the special meeting and the closing of the
merger, the market value of the Informix common stock to be received by Red
Brick's stockholders also would decline. The closing price for Informix common
stock on October 7, 1998, the last trading day prior to the public announcement
of the merger, was $4.00. On November , 1998, the latest practicable trading
day before the printing of this proxy statement/prospectus, the closing price
for Informix common stock was $ . You should obtain recent market quotations
for Informix common stock and Red Brick common stock because these stocks have
historically been subject to substantial volatility.
VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICES
The market prices of Informix common stock and Red Brick common stock may
fluctuate significantly before the merger. After the merger, the market price of
Informix common stock may fluctuate significantly. A number of factors could
affect the market price of these securities before the merger and the market
price of Informix common stock after the merger, including:
- Revenue or income below analysts' expectations;
- Announcements of new products by one of the companies or its competitors;
- Quarterly fluctuations in financial results of Informix or other software
companies;
- Changes in analysts' estimates of the future financial performance of
Informix, its competitors or other software companies;
- General business conditions in the software industry;
- Changes in prices for products of Informix, Red Brick or their
competitors;
- Changes in revenue growth rates for Informix, Red Brick or their
competitors;
- Sales of large blocks of Red Brick common stock or Informix common stock;
and
- Conditions in the financial markets in general and technology companies in
particular, whose stock may experience extreme price and volume
fluctuations without regard to operating performance.
CONDITIONS TO THE CLOSING OF THE MERGER
The merger will not close unless several conditions are met, including:
- Each representation and warranty made by Informix and Red Brick must be
materially accurate;
- Events specified in the merger agreement must occur;
- Events specified in the merger agreement must not occur;
- Informix and Red Brick must satisfy their respective covenants specified
in the merger agreement; and
8
<PAGE>
- Red Brick must complete audits of its financial results for the first
three calendar quarters of 1998 and the nine months ended September 30,
1998 and the results must not differ materially from the financial results
disclosed by Red Brick for those periods in its applicable quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q.
RISKS RELATING TO INFORMIX
UNCERTAIN IMPACT OF RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 1997 RESTATEMENT. In November 1997, Informix restated its
financial statements for fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994. This restatement was
necessary due to errors and irregularities that took place during these fiscal
periods. The restatement significantly changed Informix's previously reported
financial condition, particularly because it eliminated Informix's retained
earnings and working capital.
As a result of the restatement, total revenues and net income for fiscal
years 1994-1996 were reduced from amounts previously reported:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
FISCAL YEAR --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- --------------------------
(IN MILLIONS) AS REPORTED RESTATED DIFFERENCE AS REPORTED RESTATED DIFFERENCE AS REPORTED RESTATED
------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE............... $ 939.3 $ 734.5 $ (204.8) $ 714.2 $ 636.5 $ (77.7) $ 470.1 $ 452.0
NET INCOME (LOSS)..... $ 97.8 $ (73.6) $ (171.4) $ 97.6 $ 38.6 $ (59.0) $ 61.9 $ 48.3
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
(IN MILLIONS) DIFFERENCE
-----------
<S> <C>
REVENUE............... $ (18.1)
NET INCOME (LOSS)..... $ (13.6)
</TABLE>
The restatement also resulted in a $16.2 million increase in revenues for
the first quarter of 1997.
Informix investigated the errors and irregularities that caused it to
restate its financial statements and discovered a number of weaknesses in its
internal controls. These conditions together represent a "material weakness."
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines a material
weakness as a condition in which existing internal controls do not adequately
reduce the risk that material errors or irregularities occur and are not
detected in a timely manner. Informix is implementing a plan to strengthen its
internal accounting controls.
MAY 1998 RESTATEMENT. In May 1998, on the advice of its former independent
accountants, Informix decided to recognize revenue for license agreements with
customers who include Informix products for resale in their own products when
those products are eventually sold to their customers. As a result, Informix
restated its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 1998. This
restatement decreased revenue by $6.2 million, and resulted in a net loss for
the quarter.
FINANCE PERSONNEL. In connection with its audit of Informix's fiscal 1997
financial statements, Informix's former independent accountants determined that
a material weakness existed because of a lack of sufficient staffing in
Informix's finance department and other conditions. Informix has hired and is
continuing to hire a number of employees and consultants for its finance
department to ensure that necessary accounting controls are in place.
GENERAL. Customer and investor uncertainty about Informix's future
financial results and business prospects could harm Informix's ability to sell
its products. This could seriously harm Informix's business.
More detailed discussions of the restatements that were completed by
Informix in November 1997 and in May 1998 are located in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and in
Note B of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. You should read these
discussions carefully.
9
<PAGE>
NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FINANCING
In the future, Informix may need additional working capital. Informix's
inability to obtain additional financing, if and when needed, on commercially
favorable terms, could seriously harm Informix's business.
In December 1997, Informix Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
Informix's principal operating subsidiary, entered into a loan agreement with a
syndicate of commercial banks. The purpose of the loan agreement is to provide
Informix with working capital. The loan agreement provides Informix with a line
of credit of up to $75 million, with the actual amount borrowable based on a
percentage of accounts receivable. As a result, the total amount available under
the loan agreement will change from time to time based on Informix's
receivables. As of September 30, 1998, Informix had not borrowed any money under
the loan agreement. The loan agreement is secured by all of the assets of
Informix Software and the capital stock of Informix Software and Informix's
other subsidiaries domiciled in the United States.
In order to borrow money under the loan agreement, Informix must:
- Maintain specified financial ratios and minimum quarterly revenues, income
and cash flow;
- Limit capital expenditures; and
- Refrain from engaging in any merger, consolidation, reorganization or
other transaction resulting in a fundamental change.
At June 30, 1998, Informix was not in compliance with the requirements of
the loan agreement because it did not have the quarterly cash flows required by
the loan agreement for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1998. However, the
banks waived Informix's non-compliance and amended the loan agreement so that it
is now more favorable to Informix. Informix was in compliance with the amended
requirements of the loan agreement as of September 30, 1998. There is no
assurance that Informix will be able to meet its obligations under the amended
loan agreement.
WORKING CAPITAL DEFICIT
Informix has a working capital deficit of $14.4 million as of September 30,
1998. This deficit includes liabilities categorized as advances from customers
and financial institutions totaling $139.3 million as of September 30, 1998.
These advances are payments that were made by customers, or received from
financial institutions, before Informix recognized revenue related to these
payments. Informix could be required to refund such advances if Informix fails
to comply with certain contractual terms of a specific license agreement.
If Informix continues to maintain a substantial working capital deficit, it
could seriously harm Informix's ability to sell its products because customers
and potential customers may be concerned about Informix's financial condition
and choose not to buy Informix's products.
SLOWING GROWTH IN RDBMS MARKET
Growth rates have been declining in the RDBMS industry. Industry analysts
and competitors have predicted continued decline. The decline may become even
larger because of recent instability in the Asia-Pacific region. A further
decline in industry growth rates could harm Informix's business.
10
<PAGE>
FLUCTUATIONS IN QUARTERLY RESULTS; SEASONALITY
Informix is generally unable to predict accurately its future quarterly
revenues and operating results. There have been large fluctuations in Informix's
quarterly revenues and operating results in the past and these fluctuations may
continue because of:
- Changes in demand for Informix's software;
- Changes in the domestic or international economies;
- Aggressive price discounting by Informix or its competitors which could
result in the decline of revenue and net income;
- The size, timing and contractual terms of significant orders, especially
because Informix generally recognizes a large portion of its revenue at
the end of a quarter;
- The timing of the introduction of new products or product enhancements by
Informix or its competitors;
- Customer uncertainty about Informix's financial condition and business
prospects;
- Changes in the mix of revenues attributable to domestic and international
sales; and
- Seasonal buying patterns which tend to peak in the fourth quarter.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
LITIGATION. Since April 16, 1997, various Informix investors have filed
over 20 separate lawsuits against Informix, Ernst & Young LLP (Informix's former
independent accountants) and certain current and former officers and directors
of Informix. Most of the lawsuits have been filed as purported class actions by
persons who claim that they purchased Informix's common stock during a purported
class period. The complaints in the lawsuits, in general, do not specify the
amount of damages that plaintiffs seek.
The plaintiffs claim that:
- The defendants made or were responsible for false or misleading statements
in Informix's filings with the SEC, press releases, statements to
securities analysts and other public statements regarding Informix's
financial results and business prospects;
- The defendants overstated Informix's revenue and earnings by improperly
recognizing revenue from sales of software licenses; and
- Some current or former officers and directors engaged in insider trading
by selling stock when they knew Informix's revenue and earnings were
misstated.
The complaints allege violations of federal and state securities laws,
fraud, and violations of California's unfair business practices statutes.
Informix also was named as a nominal defendant in eight derivative actions.
These actions have been consolidated into a single proceeding, and the
consolidated complaint names as defendants Ernst & Young, and certain current or
former officers and directors of Informix. The plaintiffs claim that defendants:
- Breached their fiduciary duties to Informix;
- Engaged in abuses of their control of Informix;
- Were unjustly enriched by their sales of Informix's common stock;
- Engaged in insider trading in violation of California law; and
11
<PAGE>
- Published false financial information in violation of California law.
Because of the nature of a derivative action, Informix will be entitled to
any recovery from this litigation.
The pending federal and state securities actions are in the early stages of
discovery. As a result, Informix is unable to estimate the possible range of
damages that might be incurred as a result of the lawsuits. Informix has not set
aside any financial reserves relating to any of these lawsuits. The uncertainty
associated with substantial unresolved lawsuits could seriously harm Informix's
business. In particular, the lawsuits could harm Informix's relationships with
existing customers and its ability to obtain new customers. The continued
defense of the lawsuits could also result in the diversion of management's time
and attention away from business operations, which could harm Informix's
business. The lawsuits could also have the effect of discouraging potential
acquirors from bidding for Informix or reducing the consideration they would
otherwise be willing to pay in connection with an acquisition.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION INVESTIGATION. In July 1997, the
Securities and Exchange Commission issued a formal order of investigation of
Informix and certain unidentified individuals associated with Informix. The
investigation relates to non-specified accounting matters, financial reports,
other public disclosures and trading activity in Informix's stock. Informix is
cooperating with the investigation and is providing all information subpoenaed
by the Commission. Informix is in the process of producing documents and a
number of current and former officers have been contacted to provide testimony
in the investigation.
THE NATURE AND STATUS OF EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROCEEDINGS IS MORE FULLY
DESCRIBED IN "BUSINESS OF INFORMIX--LEGAL PROCEEDINGS."
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS AND LIABILITY INSURANCE
Under Delaware law, Informix's certificate of incorporation, its bylaws and
certain indemnification agreements, Informix must indemnify its current and
former officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. The
indemnification covers any expenses and/or liabilities reasonably incurred in
connection with the investigation, defense, settlement or appeal of legal
proceedings. The obligation to provide indemnification does not apply if the
officer or director is found to be liable for fraudulent or criminal conduct.
Informix has purchased directors' and officers' liability insurance to
reimburse it for the costs incurred in connection with these indemnification
obligations. For the period from August 1996 to August 1997, the period in which
most of the claims against Informix and certain of its directors and officers
were asserted, Informix had in place three director's and officer's liability
insurance policies, each providing $5 million in coverage for a total of $15
million.
The 1996-1997 director and officer policies provide that 100% of the costs
incurred in defending claims asserted jointly against Informix and its current
and former officers and directors are allocable to the individuals' defense and,
thus, are covered by the policy. However, the 1996-1997 directors' and officers'
policies do not provide any separate coverage for Informix. Moreover, Informix
does not have separate insurance to cover the costs of its own defense or to
cover any liability for any claims asserted against it.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL; PERSONNEL CHANGES; ABILITY TO RECRUIT PERSONNEL
Informix could be seriously harmed if it is unable to attract and retain
highly skilled technical, sales, consulting, marketing and management personnel
or if it loses the services of one or more of its executive officers or key
employees. Informix depends upon a number of key management and technical
personnel, including Robert J. Finocchio, Jr., Informix's Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer and Jean-Yves F. Dexmier, Informix's Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. In
12
<PAGE>
October 1998, Myron ("Mike") Saranga, a key Informix employee, resigned from his
position as Informix's Senior Vice President for Product Management and
Development. F. Steven Weick, Vice President, Research and Development, has
succeeded Mr. Saranga.
Informix's business could be harmed if Informix is not successful in
retaining existing employees and attracting, training and retaining additional
qualified personnel, particularly in key departments such as product development
and sales.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PREFERRED STOCK FINANCINGS
In 1997 and 1998 Informix raised $101.7 million through the issuance of
convertible preferred stock.
Informix has designated series A-1 preferred stock and series B preferred
stock. Both the series A-1 preferred stock and the series B preferred stock are
convertible into shares of Informix's common stock based on the trading prices
of the common stock during future periods. The percentage of Informix common
stock owned by current Informix stockholders could decline substantially if:
- The conversion price of the preferred stock is determined during a period
when the market price of Informix common stock is low;
- The series A-1 preferred stockholders exercise their right to purchase an
additional 80,000 shares of series A-1 preferred stock; and
- The series B preferred stockholders exercise their rights to purchase, as
of September 30, 1998, 1,001,891 shares of Informix common stock at $7.84
per share.
If Informix does not comply with the terms of the preferred stock
agreements, Informix may be unable to engage in various corporate transactions,
including:
- Financing transactions; and
- Certain transactions involving a change-in-control or acquisition of
Informix.
In addition, as of September 30, 1998, series B preferred stockholders had
converted 14,000 shares of series B preferred stock into 3,759,480 shares of
common stock of Informix. At each conversion of shares of series B preferred
stock Informix must issue additional rights to acquire shares of common stock
equal to 20% of the total number of shares of common stock into which the series
B preferred stock converts.
The terms of the financing agreements also include penalty provisions that
are triggered if Informix fails to satisfy its obligations. In particular, the
holders of the series A-1 preferred stock will become entitled to an annual
dividend of approximately $3.0 million, payable quarterly in cash, if Informix
fails to satisfy certain covenants, including the following:
- Have a registration statement covering the common stock issuable upon
conversion of the series A-1 preferred stock declared effective by the
Commission within 180 days of a registration request from the holders of
series A-1 preferred stock (as of the date of this Prospectus, no shares
of series A-1 preferred stock were outstanding and, accordingly, Informix
had not received a registration request);
- Obtain stockholder approval of the issuance of the common stock issuable
upon conversion of the series A-1 preferred stock in the event that such
approval becomes required by the rules of The Nasdaq National Market; and
- Redeem the shares of series A-1 preferred stock if the holder objects to a
change-in-control transaction because the potential acquiror of Informix
does not meet specified market capitalization and trading volume
requirements.
13
<PAGE>
If Informix must pay these dividends, the holders of the series A-1
preferred stock will become immediately entitled to designate a number of
members of Informix's board of directors corresponding, as a percentage of the
total number of members, to the percentage of Informix's outstanding common
stock held by these holders.
The holders of the series B preferred stock are entitled to receive a
cumulative dividend at an annual rate of 5% of the face value of each share of
series B preferred stock. As of September 30, 1998, that amount was $1.8 million
based on the 36,000 shares of series B preferred stock (face value $1,000 per
share) outstanding. The dividend is generally payable on the conversion or
redemption of the series B preferred stock and may be paid in cash or shares of
common stock. Informix may be unable to fund the payment or redemption and, even
if funding is available, large dividend payments may seriously harm Informix's
business.
COMPETITION; PRICING RISKS
Informix faces intense competition in the market for RDBMS software
products. Informix's competitors in the market include several large vendors
that develop and market databases, applications, development tools or decision
support products. Informix's principal competitors include Computer Associates,
IBM, Microsoft, NCR/Teradata, Oracle and Sybase. Most of these competitors have
significantly greater resources than Informix. As a result, they may be able to
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and
sale of their products than Informix.
The following factors could drive down the prices of database software and
related products:
- Increased customer use of new operating systems like Windows NT;
- Access to these products through low-end desktop computers;
- Access to data through the Internet;
- The bundling of these software products for promotional purposes or as a
long-term pricing strategy; and
- Aggressive price discounting by Informix or its competitors.
If Informix significantly reduces the prices of its products or services,
and these reductions are not offset by increases in sales volume, Informix's
business could be seriously harmed.
TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND NEW PRODUCTS
The market for Informix's products and services is characterized by:
- Rapidly changing technology;
- Changing customer needs;
- Frequent new product introductions; and
- Evolving industry standards that may render existing products and services
obsolete.
The life cycles of Informix's products are difficult to estimate. In order
to grow and prosper, Informix must:
- Continue to enhance its existing products;
- Introduce new products on a timely and cost-effective basis;
- Match or exceed the product deliveries of its competitors; and
14
<PAGE>
- Continue to make substantial investments in its product development
efforts.
Informix may not have sufficient resources to make necessary investments.
Informix has experienced product development delays in the past and may
experience delays in the future because of:
- High attrition in its product development group; and
- Difficulty in attracting qualified replacement development personnel.
These problems could harm Informix's ability to develop new products or
product enhancements. Delays in the scheduled availability, a lack of market
acceptance of its products or Informix's failure to accurately anticipate
customer demand and meet customer performance requirements could seriously harm
Informix's business.
In addition, despite testing, products as complex as Informix's may contain
undetected errors or bugs when first introduced or as new versions are released.
Undetected errors or bugs could delay the introduction or commercial acceptance
of the products.
Commercial acceptance of Informix's products and services could also be
harmed by:
- Critical or negative statements made or reports issued by brokerage firms,
industry analysts or financial analysts;
- Advertising or marketing efforts of competitors;
- Other factors that could affect consumer perception, including the
restatement of Informix's financial statements, a continuing working
capital deficit and its restructuring; and
- Delays in market acceptance of object-relational database management
products offered by Informix
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS; CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS
Informix's business could be harmed by factors associated with international
operations such as:
- Changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
- Uncertainties relative to regional, political and economic circumstances;
and
- Recent instability in the Asia-Pacific region.
International sales represented approximately 54% of total revenues for the
years ended December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996, and 52% of total revenues
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998. Informix's sales to the
Asia-Pacific region accounted for approximately 12% of Informix's total revenues
in the year ended December 31, 1997, 13% of Informix's total revenues in the
year ended December 31, 1996, and 11% of Informix's total revenues in the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998.
Informix cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on future
operating results. Most of Informix's international revenue and expenses are
denominated in local currencies. Informix takes into account changes in exchange
rates in its pricing strategy, but only on an annual basis. As a result,
Informix has substantial foreign exchange risk during the period between annual
pricing reviews.
Informix attempts to reduce this pricing exposure by entering into forward
currency exchange contracts to hedge up to 80% of the forecasted net income of
its foreign subsidiaries for up to one year in the future. If Informix does not
accurately forecast net income or properly hedge these amounts, Informix's
operating results could be harmed.
15
<PAGE>
Also, the sales cycles for Informix's products is relatively long. Foreign
currency fluctuations could, therefore, result in large changes in the financial
impact of a specific transaction between the time of initial customer contact
and revenue recognition. As a result of the foregoing factors, Informix's
business could be seriously harmed by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
YEAR 2000 RISKS
Many currently installed computer systems and software products are coded to
accept only two digit entries in the date code field. These date code fields
will need to accept four digit entries to distinguish 21st century dates from
20th century dates. As a result, in less than two years, computer systems and/or
software used by many companies may need to be upgraded to comply with Year 2000
requirements. Significant uncertainty exists in the software industry concerning
the potential effects associated with such compliance.
Informix could incur large costs and the disruption of its business if key
systems fail as a result of Year 2000 problems or if Informix experiences delays
in implementing Year 2000 compliant software products. To the extent Informix is
relying on the products of other vendors to resolve Year 2000 issues, Informix
may experience delays in implementing the products.
In addition, the failure to correct a significant Year 2000 problem could
result in an interruption in, or a failure of, certain normal business
activities or operations which could harm Informix's business. Informix may not
have enough available personnel to implement its Year 2000 project.
Also, Year 2000 issues may affect the purchasing patterns of customers and
potential customers. Many companies are spending large amounts of money to
become Year 2000 compliant. Their spending may reduce funds available to
purchase Informix products.
Informix is:
- Reviewing the Year 2000 compliance status of the software and systems used
in its internal business processes; and
- Obtaining appropriate assurances of compliance from the manufacturers of
these products and agreement to modify or replace all non-compliant
products.
Informix expects this work to be substantially complete by the Fall of 1999.
In addition, Informix is considering converting certain of its internal
software and systems to commercial products from third parties that are known to
be Year 2000 compliant. This conversion will require:
- The dedication of substantial time from both Informix administrative and
management information personnel;
- The assistance of consulting personnel from third party software vendors;
and
- The training of Informix's personnel using such systems.
Based on available information, Informix believes it will be able to
complete its Year 2000 compliance review and make necessary modifications prior
to the end of 1999. Software or systems which are important to Informix's
business are scheduled to be Year 2000 compliant by the end of 1998.
Informix's Year 2000 Project is expected to significantly reduce Informix's
level of uncertainty about the Year 2000 problem and, in particular, about the
Year 2000 compliance and readiness of its material third parties suppliers.
Informix believes that the probability of significant interruptions of normal
operations will be reduced with the implementation of new business systems and
completion of the project as scheduled.
16
<PAGE>
EUROPEAN MONETARY CONVERSION
On January 1, 1999, a new currency, the Euro, will become the legal currency
for eleven of the fifteen member countries of the European Economic Community.
Between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2002, governments, companies and
individuals may conduct business in these countries in both the Euro and the
existing national currencies. On January 1, 2002, the Euro will become the sole
currency in these countries.
Informix is evaluating the impact of conversion to the Euro on its business.
In particular, Informix is reviewing:
- Whether it may have to change the prices of its products in the different
countries because they will now be denominated in the same currency in
each country;
- Whether its internal software systems can process transactions denominated
either in current national currencies or the Euro, including converting
currencies using computation methods specified by the European Economic
Community;
- The cost to Informix if it must modify or replace any of its internal
software systems; and
- Whether it will have to change the terms of any financial instruments in
connection with its hedging activities.
Based on current information and Informix's initial evaluation, Informix
does not expect the cost of any necessary corrective action to seriously harm
its business. However, Informix will continue to evaluate the impact of these
and other possible effects of the conversion to the Euro on its business.
Informix cannot guarantee that the costs associated with conversion to the Euro
will not in the future seriously harm its business.
DEPENDENCE ON PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY; RISKS OF INFRINGEMENT
Informix's success depends on proprietary technology. Informix cannot
guarantee that it can effectively protect its technology. The loss of any
substantial portion of Informix's rights in its technology or extended
litigation to protect its rights could seriously damage Informix's business.
Informix relies primarily on a combination of:
- Patent, copyright and trademark laws;
- Trade secrets;
- Confidentiality procedures;
- Contractual provisions contained in its license agreements; and
- Technical measures.
Informix may be unable to protect its technology because:
- Unauthorized third parties may be able to copy aspects of Informix's
products or to obtain and use Informix's proprietary information;
- Informix's competitors may independently develop similar or superior
technology;
- Policing unauthorized use of Informix's software is difficult;
- The laws of some foreign countries do not protect Informix's proprietary
rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States;
- "Shrink-wrap" licenses may be wholly or partially unenforceable under the
laws of certain jurisdictions;
17
<PAGE>
- Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce Informix's
intellectual property rights, to protect Informix's trade secrets or to
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others; and
- Third parties may claim that Informix products infringe upon their
proprietary rights.
PRODUCT LIABILITY
A product liability claim brought against Informix could harm Informix's
business. Nevertheless, Informix's license agreements with its customers
typically contain provisions designed to limit Informix's exposure to product
liability claims.
ANTITAKEOVER PROTECTIONS
Informix is authorized to issue, without any further vote or action by its
stockholders, preferred stock with dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion
rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices and liquidation
preferences determined by the Informix board of directors. This ability could
have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control or
acquisition of Informix.
The issuance of preferred stock could drive down the market price of
Informix common stock and the voting and other rights of the holders of Informix
common stock. The issuance of preferred stock could weaken the voting power of
the holders of Informix common stock through the loss of voting control. In
particular, certain rights, preferences and privileges of the series A-1
preferred stock and series B preferred stock could prevent or discourage
potential bids to acquire Informix, unless the terms of the acquisition are
approved by the holders of preferred stock.
Informix has taken steps designed to reduce its vulnerability to an
unsolicited acquisition proposal. These include:
- Elimination of the right of stockholders to act without holding a meeting;
- Certain procedures for nominating directors and submitting proposals for
consideration at stockholder meetings; and
- A board of directors divided into three classes, with each class standing
for election once every three years.
These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and
stability in the management of Informix. They may discourage certain types of
transactions which involve an actual or threatened change in control or
acquisition of Informix. These steps are also intended to discourage certain
tactics that may be used in proxy fights, but they could have the effect of
discouraging tender offers for shares of Informix's common stock. They may
prevent an increase in the market price of Informix's common stock resulting
from actual or rumored takeover attempts.
Informix has adopted a rights agreement that grants holders of Informix
common stock preferential rights in the event of an unsolicited takeover
attempt. These rights are denied to any stockholder involved in the takeover
attempt and this has the effect of requiring cooperation with Informix's board
of directors. This may also prevent an increase in the market price of
Informix's common stock resulting from actual or rumored takeover attempts.
Informix is subject to Delaware's antitakeover law which prevents certain
Delaware corporations, such as Informix, from engaging in a business combination
with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date
that the stockholder became an interested stockholder. A business combination
includes, among other things, a merger or consolidation involving Informix and
the interested stockholder and the sale of more than 10% of Informix's assets.
An interested stockholder is any
18
<PAGE>
entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock
of Informix. This may also delay, defer or prevent a change in control or
acquisition of Informix.
VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE
The market price of Informix's common stock has fluctuated significantly in
the past and may continue to fluctuate significantly because of:
- Market uncertainty about Informix's financial condition or business
prospects or the prospects for the RDBMS market in general;
- Revenues or results of operations that do not match analysts'
expectations;
- The introduction of new products or product enhancements by Informix or
its competitors;
- General business conditions in the software industry;
- Changes in the mix of revenues attributable to domestic and international
sales; and
- Seasonal trends in technology purchases and other general economic
conditions.
In addition, the stock market is subject to extreme price and volume
fluctuations, which particularly affect the market for the securities of many
technology companies. These fluctuations have often been unrelated to the
operating performance of the specific companies.
RISKS RELATING TO RED BRICK
POTENTIAL FLUCTUATIONS IN QUARTERLY RESULTS; SEASONALITY
In the past, Red Brick's quarterly operating results have varied
significantly. Red Brick's quarterly results may also vary significantly in the
future. A number of factors are likely to cause these variations, including:
- Increased competition;
- Size, timing and contractual terms of significant orders, especially
because Red Brick generally recognizes a large portion of its revenue in
the last two weeks of a quarter;
- Timing of new product announcements and pricing policy changes by Red
Brick and its competitors;
- Market acceptance of new and enhanced versions of Red Brick's products;
- Customer uncertainty about Red Brick's financial condition and business
prospects;
- Changes in operating expenses;
- Changes in personnel;
- Changes in the mix of direct and indirect sales;
- Seasonal buying patterns which tend to be weaker in the first and the
third quarter;
- Foreign currency exchange rates; and
- General economic factors.
Red Brick cannot predict with any significant degree of certainty its
operating results for any future quarter. Red Brick's expense levels are
relatively fixed and are based, in part, on expectations as to future revenues.
Consequently, if revenue levels fall below Red Brick's expectations, Red Brick's
net
19
<PAGE>
loss will increase because only a small portion of Red Brick's expenses vary
with its revenues. However, Red Brick experiences difficulty in predicting
product revenues for several reasons, including:
- Product revenues in any quarter are substantially dependent on orders
booked and shipped in that quarter since Red Brick has virtually no order
backlog;
- The market for data warehouse software products is rapidly evolving;
- Red Brick's sales cycle, which may last many months, varies substantially
from customer to customer; and
- Red Brick expects that sales derived through indirect channels, which are
harder to forecast and have lower gross margins than direct sales, will
increase as a percentage of total revenues.
Red Brick's operating results were below the expectations of financial
analysts and investors for the quarters ended March 31, 1997, and June 30, 1998.
As a result, Red Brick experienced a significant decrease in the price of its
common stock. Red Brick's operating results may be below analysts' and
investors' expectations in some future quarters as well. Red Brick's failure to
meet such expectations would likely seriously harm the price of Red Brick's
common stock.
FAILURE TO CLOSE MERGER
If the merger does not close, such failure will seriously harm Red Brick's
business, financial condition and results of operations because the announcement
of the merger and Red Brick's efforts to close the merger will have
significantly reduced its cash position and is likely to:
- Disrupt Red Brick's sales and marketing efforts;
- Delay orders for Red Brick products and services;
- Increase the concerns of current and potential customers and employees
regarding Red Brick's financial condition and business prospects;
- Increase employee turnover;
- Damage employee morale and productivity; and
- Divert the attention of Red Brick management.
EFFECT OF DECREASED CASH AND WORKING CAPITAL
In each quarter of 1998 and the year ended December 31, 1997, Red Brick has
experienced losses from its operations. These losses caused a significant
decline in Red Brick's cash balances and working capital. As a result, market
analysts raised concerns about Red Brick's stability and its ability to support
its products. Existing and prospective customers, who typically rely on market
analysts for purchase advice, have raised similar concerns. As a result, Red
Brick has experienced delays in orders and corresponding reductions in revenue.
If the merger is not consummated, Red Brick expects that such concerns will
increase and this, in turn, will cause additional delays and lost revenue. In
addition, Red Brick's decreased cash position has affected its ability to
recruit and retain employees. If the merger is not consummated, Red Brick
expects that these conditions will continue to affect the stability of its
employee base in future quarters.
DEPENDENCE UPON KEY PERSONNEL; NEED TO RETAIN SALES AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL
Red Brick's future performance depends significantly upon the continued
service of its key technical, sales and senior management personnel. However,
none of these personnel is bound by an employment agreement with Red Brick. The
loss of the services of one or more of Red Brick's key employees in the future
could seriously harm Red Brick's business, operating results and financial
condition.
20
<PAGE>
Red Brick's future success also depends on its continuing ability to attract
and retain highly qualified technical, sales and managerial personnel.
Competition for such personnel is intense and Red Brick has lost significant
numbers of technical, sales and management personnel in recent periods. Red
Brick may be unable to retain the remaining key technical, sales and managerial
employees. Additionally, Red Brick may be unable to attract, assimilate or
retain other highly qualified technical, sales and managerial personnel in the
future. Red Brick's failure to retain existing employees or to hire additional
personnel on a timely basis in the future could seriously harm its business,
operating results and financial condition.
If the merger is not consummated, Red Brick's success will depend on its
ability to enhance its current products and to develop and introduce new
products on a timely basis that are accepted by customers. Red Brick believes
that its current cash and investment balances are sufficient to meet anticipated
working capital and capital expenditure requirements through at least December
31, 1998. Thereafter, Red Brick will have to raise additional capital to fund
operations, increase revenues from existing and/or new products and/or reduce
spending. Red Brick may not be able to raise additional capital, increase
revenues or reduce spending. Red Brick's inability to raise additional capital,
increase revenues or reduce spending would seriously harm Red Brick's financial
condition and results of operations.
COMPETITION
The market for Red Brick's products is intensely competitive and subject to
rapid change. Red Brick primarily encounters competition from large public
companies, including Oracle, Informix, Sybase, IBM, and NCR/Teradata. Red Brick
expects additional competition from other established and emerging companies as
the data warehouse software market continues to develop and expand. With the
introduction in the third quarter of 1998 of Red Brick Formation, Red Brick
expects to encounter competition from a new category of vendors, including
Ardent and Informatica. Many of Red Brick's competitors have one or more of the
following competitive advantages over Red Brick:
- Longer operating history;
- Significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, distribution
and other resources;
- Significantly greater name recognition;
- Larger installed base of customers;
- Better established relationships with current and potential customers of
Red Brick;
- Greater knowledge of the relational database industry; and
- Capabilities to offer customers a single vendor solution.
As a result of these advantages, Red Brick's competitors may be able to
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements. They may also be able to devote greater resources to the
development, promotion and sale of their products than Red Brick can to its
products. In addition, current and potential competitors have established, or
may establish, cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase their ability to address customer needs. Accordingly, new
competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire
significant market share. Red Brick also expects that competition will increase
as a result of software industry consolidations. If competition increases, Red
Brick is likely to experience product price reductions, reduced gross margins
and loss of market share. Any of those effects could seriously harm Red Brick's
business, operating results and financial condition. Due to these factors, Red
Brick may be unable to compete successfully against its current and future
competitors.
21
<PAGE>
POTENTIAL SELLING PRICE EROSION
In the second and third quarters of 1998, Red Brick's average selling price
declined to as low as $80,000 from in excess of $150,000 in 1997. This decline
in average selling price had an adverse impact on Red Brick's operating results.
Many factors affect Red Brick's average selling price and have contributed to
its decline, including the following:
- Orders have shifted from higher-priced Unix versions of Red Brick
Warehouse to the lower-priced Windows NT version;
- Increased distribution through indirect channels, both internationally and
domestically, resulting in lower realized prices; and
- Intense competition, including significant price discounts and the
bundling of multiple software products by competitors.
Red Brick expects these trends to continue and to experience continued
decreases in the average selling prices of Red Brick Warehouse in future
quarters. Unless Red Brick can offset price reductions with a corresponding
increase in sales volumes, continued declining prices are likely to seriously
harm Red Brick's business, operating results, and financial condition.
SALES AND MARKETING REPOSITIONING
Red Brick has implemented several changes in its sales and marketing
management and strategies. In July 1998, Anthony Layzell, who had been serving
as Red Brick's Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing, left Red Brick. As a
result, Christopher Erickson, President, CEO, and Chairman, assumed
responsibility for the international sales organization and Paul Rodwick was
promoted to Vice President, Marketing. Red Brick has also made several recent
changes within the senior sales management team. In addition, Red Brick has
experienced significant turnover within its sales organization. Red Brick
believes there may be a transition period before the new sales management team
and sales representatives become fully productive. Furthermore, Red Brick may
make other management and organizational changes in the future. Red Brick has
also implemented changes to its sales and marketing strategies, including an
increased focus on partnership relationships and indirect sales and the re-
positioning of Red Brick as a leading provider of integrated data warehouse
products and services. Red Brick intends these management and strategic changes
to enhance its productivity and competitiveness in the marketplace. However, if
Red Brick's changes fail to produce the desired results, they could seriously
harm Red Brick's productivity, expenses and revenues, particularly over the next
several quarters. In addition, Red Brick's operating results over the next
several quarters may be less predictable than in the past.
STOCK PRICE VOLATILITY
The market price of Red Brick's common stock has fluctuated significantly in
the past and could continue to fluctuate significantly in the future because of:
- Quarterly variations in operating results;
- Announcements of technological innovations or new products by Red Brick or
its competitors;
- Changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
- Changes in market valuations of database or data warehousing companies;
and
- Additions or departures of key personnel.
22
<PAGE>
In addition to the above factors, the stock market has experienced
volatility, often unrelated to operating performance, that particularly affected
market prices of equity securities of many high technology companies. Such
market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of Red Brick's common
stock.
DEPENDENCE ON NEW PRODUCTS AND RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE
The market for Red Brick's software is characterized by rapid technological
change, frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards. The
introduction by competitors of products embodying new technologies and the
emergence of new industry standards can render Red Brick's existing products
obsolete and unmarketable. Red Brick's future success depends on a number of
factors, including its ability to:
- Enhance its current products;
- Develop and introduce new products that keep pace with technological
developments and emerging industry standards on a timely basis;
- Market and sell effectively its new and enhanced products; and
- Address the increasingly sophisticated needs of its customers.
In September 1998, Red Brick made the first customer shipments of Red Brick
Formation. Since Red Brick Formation is a new product in its first commercial
version, it has not yet proved that it is sufficient in terms of functionality,
performance or reliability to meet customer requirements or that it will be
generally salable. The failure of Red Brick Formation to operate as expected
could seriously harm Red Brick's business, operating results and financial
condition.
In July 1998, Red Brick announced its intention to build and market analytic
application products in addition to its Red Brick Warehouse and Red Brick
Formation product lines. However, Red Brick may be unable to:
- Develop and market successfully analytic application products;
- Develop successfully other product enhancements or new products that
respond to technological change or evolving industry standards;
- Avoid difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development,
introduction and marketing of new products and product enhancements; or
- Meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance for
its new products and product enhancements.
Any potential new products or product enhancements would likely have
significant technical risks. If the commencement of commercial shipments of new
products and enhancements is delayed, Red Brick could experience loss, or delays
in receipt, of product revenues. Red Brick may fail, for technological or other
reasons, to develop and introduce new products or enhancements of existing
products in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or
customer requirements. Such failure could seriously harm its business, operating
results and financial condition.
Complex software products, such as those offered by Red Brick, may contain
undetected errors or failures when first introduced or when new versions are
released. Red Brick has previously discovered software errors in certain of its
new products after their introduction. Although Red Brick has not experienced
serious harm resulting from any such errors to date, its products may contain
errors. The discovery of errors in its products could result in a loss of, or
delay in, market acceptance of that product. In turn, such losses or delays
could seriously harm Red Brick's business, operating results and financial
condition.
23
<PAGE>
LIMITED PROFITABILITY; ACCUMULATED DEFICIT; FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
UNCERTAIN
As of September 30, 1998, Red Brick had an accumulated a deficit of $41.5
million. Red Brick had a $5.0 million loss in the third quarter of 1998 and a
$15.0 million loss for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998. In
addition, Red Brick was not profitable in 1997. Red Brick may fail to become
profitable on a quarterly basis or on an annual basis in the future. Future
operating results will depend on many factors, including:
- The demand for Red Brick's products;
- The level of product and price competition;
- Red Brick's success in expanding its direct sales force and indirect
distribution channels;
- Red Brick's ability to complete the development of in-process technology
acquired;
- Red Brick's ability to develop and market new products;
- Red Brick's ability to control costs while executing a new product plan;
and
- General economic conditions.
PRODUCT CONCENTRATION
Red Brick derives substantially all of its revenues from two sources: (1)
sales of licenses of Red Brick Warehouse, and (2) related maintenance and
service contracts. Even though Red Brick introduced Red Brick Formation in
September 1998, Red Brick expects the Red Brick Warehouse product to continue to
account for the significant part of Red Brick's revenues for the foreseeable
future. Competition, technological change or other factors could lead to a
decline in demand for Red Brick Warehouse or result in a failure of Red Brick
Warehouse to achieve broad market acceptance. Such decline or failure would
seriously harm the business, operating results and financial condition of Red
Brick. A decline in sales of Red Brick Warehouse would also seriously harm the
licensing of other Red Brick products to Red Brick Warehouse customers.
LITIGATION
On March 25, 1998, certain Red Brick stockholders acting on behalf of
themselves and other persons who purchased Red Brick's common stock between
January 15, 1997 and April 15, 1997, filed two purported class action lawsuits
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On
May 28, 1998, the Court consolidated the two lawsuits into one action. On
September 2, 1998, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Class Action Complaint for
the consolidated action (the "Amended Complaint"). The Amended Complaint names
as defendants, among others, Red Brick and certain of its present and former
officers and directors. The complaint alleges violations of the federal
securities laws and seeks unspecified monetary damages. Red Brick believes that
the Amended Complaint is without merit and, on October 7, 1998, Red Brick filed
a motion to dismiss the complaint. A hearing on the motion to dismiss is
tentatively scheduled for December 15, 1998. The pending litigation against Red
Brick, and any future litigation against Red Brick or its employees, may result
in substantial costs and expenses to Red Brick, even if Red Brick prevails in
its case or settles the litigation. Such costs may include a significant
diversion of time and effort by Red Brick's technical and management personnel.
Red Brick could be seriously harmed by an unfavorable resolution of such
litigation. Depending on their breadth and timing, pending litigation and any
future litigation against Red Brick could seriously harm Red Brick's business,
future results of operation, cash flows, or financial condition.
24
<PAGE>
DEPENDENCE ON CONTINUED GROWTH OF THE DATA WAREHOUSE MARKET
Although demand for data warehouse software has grown in recent years, the
market is still emerging. Red Brick's future financial performance will depend
to a large extent on two conditions: (1) continued growth in the number of
organizations adopting data warehouses, and (2) existing Red Brick customers
expanding their use of data warehouses. The data warehouse market, however, may
not continue to grow and its customers may not expand their use of data
warehouses. A failure of the data warehouse market to grow, or slower growth
than Red Brick currently anticipates, could seriously harm Red Brick's business,
operating results, and financial condition.
OPERABILITY WITH INDEPENDENT PRODUCTS
Red Brick's operating results depend upon the ability of its products to
operate with related products of certain independent vendors, including leading,
industry standard relational database management systems ("RDBMS") and
application software products. If Red Brick fails to meet existing or future
requirements for operating with related products in a timely manner, demand for
Red Brick's products could be harmed. The ability of certain leading
applications to operate with Red Brick's RDBMS depends on the addition of
certain features to Red Brick's RDBMS. However, Red Brick may never be able to
make such additions. The new Red Brick product, Red Brick Formation, depends on
its ability to operate with commercial RDBMS products sold by Oracle and other
companies. Development and support of Red Brick Formation requires that Red
Brick obtain and maintain licenses to these third-party RDBMS products. Since
Oracle and other RDMBS product vendors are among Red Brick's main competitors,
Red Brick may not be able to obtain and maintain the software licenses necessary
to continue to develop and support these products.
CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
Red Brick depends upon a relatively small number of customers and resellers
for a significant percentage of its revenues. The loss of a major customer or
reseller or any reduction in orders by such customers or resellers could
seriously harm Red Brick. As a result, Red Brick's business, financial
condition, and results of operations would be seriously harmed.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Red Brick is aware of the issues associated with existing computer systems
as the Year 2000 approaches. Year 2000 issues are pervasive and complex, as
virtually every computer operation will be affected in some way by the rollover
of the two-digit year value to 00. The question is whether computer systems will
properly recognize date sensitive information when the year changes to 2000.
Systems that do not properly recognize such information could generate erroneous
data or cause a system to fail. In 1996, Red Brick began a complete Year 2000
compliance review for all products then shipping. Red Brick has extended this
review to new products developed and released since that time. Red Brick also
extended this review to the technology acquired in 1997 from Engage and the SQL-
Backtrack for Red Brick Warehouse product that was co-developed with a third
party.
Red Brick defines Year 2000 compliance for its products as follows:
- INTERNAL FORMATS: Products store and manage all dates internally in full
four-digit year format;
- CALCULATIONS AND CONVERSIONS: Date calculations are performed correctly.
All operations are performed on whole dates, and conversions between
internal formats and external representations are implemented correctly.
No date value can cause improper operation. Year 2000 is recognized as a
leap year;
- IMPLICIT CENTURY REPRESENTATION: All product features and interfaces have
explicit mechanisms to indicate unambiguously how to interpret two-digit
years; and
25
<PAGE>
- USER INTERFACES: When displayed in a user interface, dates are presented
with four digits.
Red Brick's internal review established that all Red Brick products on all
supported platforms are Year 2000 compliant by design. This compliance has been
confirmed by appropriate testing. Red Brick has incorporated ongoing testing for
compliance into Red Brick's standard test suites used to qualify new or updated
product releases before shipment. Red Brick regularly provides formal statements
of compliance to existing and prospective customers.
Despite design review and ongoing testing, Red Brick's products may contain
undetected errors or defects associated with Year 2000 date handling. Known or
unknown errors or defects in Red Brick's products could result in:
- Delay or loss of revenue;
- Diversion of development resources;
- Damage to reputation; and
- Increased service and warranty costs.
Any of the above conditions could seriously harm Red Brick's business, operating
results or financial condition. Some commentators have stated that a significant
amount of litigation will arise out of Year 2000 compliance issues. Because of
the unprecedented nature of such litigation, Red Brick is uncertain whether or
to what extent it may be affected by such issues.
Year 2000 issues may also affect the computer systems used internally by Red
Brick to manage and operate its business. Red Brick recently completed assessing
its current systems and working with its software vendors to confirm that
systems purchased by Red Brick are prepared for Year 2000 issues. Red Brick is
not currently aware of any material costs or operational issues associated with
Year 2000 issues affecting internal systems. Red Brick does not believe that it
will incur significant operating expenses or be required to invest heavily in
computer systems improvements to be Year 2000 compliant. Specifically, Red Brick
estimates such costs will not exceed $60,000, of which $46,000 has been spent
through November 4, 1998. However, Red Brick may experience significant
unanticipated problems and costs caused by undetected errors or defects in
internal systems. The worst-case scenario if such problems occur would be Red
Brick's inability to ship products and record revenue. Red Brick does not
currently have any information concerning the Year 2000 compliance status of its
customers or prospective customers. If current or future customers fail to
achieve Year 2000 compliance or if they divert technology expenditures
(especially technology expenditures that were reserved for data
warehousing-related software and services) to address Year 2000 compliance
issues, Red Brick's business, results of operation, or financial condition could
be seriously harmed.
Red Brick has funded its Year 2000 activities from available cash and has
not separately accounted for these costs in the past. To date, these costs have
not been material. Red Brick will incur additional costs for administrative,
customer support, internal IT, and product engineering activities to address
ongoing internal and product-related Year 2000 issues. In addition, Red Brick
may experience problems and costs with Year 2000 compliance that could seriously
harm its business, results of operations, and financial condition. Red Brick has
not yet fully developed a contingency plan to address situations that may result
if it is unable to achieve Year 2000 readiness of critical operations. The cost
of developing and implementing such a plan may itself be material. Finally, Red
Brick is also subject to external forces that might generally affect industry
and commerce, such as utility or transportation company Year 2000 compliance
failures and related service interruptions.
EXPANSION OF INDIRECT CHANNELS
An integral part of Red Brick's business strategy is to further develop a
channel of distributors, value added resellers (VARs), application partners and
system integrators and to increase the proportion of Red Brick's customers
licensed through this indirect channel. Red Brick is currently investing
26
<PAGE>
significant resources into developing this channel. This investment of resources
could harm Red Brick operating results if Red Brick's efforts do not generate
significant license revenues. Red Brick's failure to recruit or retain capable
distributors, VARs, application partners, or system integrators could seriously
harm its results of operations. In addition, if Red Brick is successful in
selling products through this channel, Red Brick's gross margins will be reduced
due to the lower unit prices Red Brick expects to receive when selling through
indirect channels.
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGING BUSINESS
Red Brick's employee base and revenue grew during 1997. In 1998 Red Brick's
customer base has continued to grow. This growth has strained Red Brick's
management systems and resources. Red Brick must continue to improve its
financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures on a timely
basis in order to compete effectively and to manage future growth. Ultimately,
Red Brick may not be able to manage this change in its business successfully.
Red Brick's failure to do so could have serious harm on Red Brick's business,
operating results, and financial condition.
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
Red Brick's international revenues for the nine month period ended September
30, 1998 and the year ended December 31, 1997, were 17% and 17% of total
revenues, respectively. In order to expand international sales successfully, Red
Brick believes it may need to establish additional foreign operations, hire
additional personnel, and recruit additional international resellers and
distributors. These tasks will require significant management attention and
financial resources. This use of resources could harm Red Brick's business,
operating results, and financial condition.
Red Brick's operations and financial results could also be significantly
affected by many factors associated with international operations, including:
- General economic conditions in each country where Red Brick sells its
products;
- Uncertainties relative to regional economic circumstances;
- Slower adoption of information technology by foreign countries;
- Changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
- Political instability in emerging markets; and
- Difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations.
Additional uncertainty inherent in Red Brick's international business
activities generally include risks such as:
- Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade
barriers;
- Costs of localizing products for foreign countries;
- Lack of acceptance of localized products in foreign countries;
- Longer accounts receivable payment cycles;
- Potentially adverse tax consequences including restrictions on the
repatriation of earnings;
- Weaker intellectual property protection in foreign countries; and
- The burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.
Some or all of the above risks may seriously harm Red Brick's future
international sales and operating results.
27
<PAGE>
LIMITED PROTECTION OF PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY; RISKS OF INFRINGEMENT
Red Brick's success depends on proprietary technology. Red Brick cannot
guarantee that it can effectively protect its technology. The loss of any
substantial portion of Red Brick's rights in its technology or extended
litigation to protect its rights could seriously damage Red Brick's business.
Red Brick relies primarily on a combination of:
- Patent, copyright and trademark laws;
- Trade secrets;
- Confidentiality procedures; and
- Contractual provisions contained in its license agreements.
Red Brick may be unable to protect its technology because:
- Unauthorized third parties may be able to copy aspects of Red Brick's
products or obtain and use Red Brick's proprietary information;
- Red Brick's competitors may independently develop similar or superior
technology;
- Policing unauthorized use of Red Brick's software is difficult;
- The laws of some foreign countries do not protect Red Brick's proprietary
rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States;
- Litigation in the future to enforce Red Bricks's intellectual property
rights, to protect Red Brick's trade secrets or to determine the validity
and scope of the proprietary rights of others may be unsuccessful; and
- Third parties may claim, with or without merit, that Red Brick products
infringe upon their proprietary rights.
Red Brick expects that software product developers will increasingly be
subject to infringement claims due to at least two developments: (1) the growth
in the number of products and competitors in Red Brick's industry segment, and
(2) the overlapping functionality of products in different industry segments.
Any such claims, with or without merit, could:
- Be time consuming;
- Result in costly litigation;
- Cause delays in product shipments; and
- Require Red Brick to enter into royalty or licensing agreements.
Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms
acceptable to Red Brick, or at all. Their unavailability would seriously harm
Red Brick's business, operating results and financial condition.
Red Brick relies upon certain software that it licenses from third parties.
Red Brick integrates the third party software into its own internally developed
software and uses it to perform key functions in such products as Red Brick
Warehouse and Red Brick Formation. These third-party software licenses may not
continue to be available to Red Brick on commercially reasonable terms. The loss
of, or inability to maintain, any such software licenses could result in delayed
or reduced shipments. This situation could last until equivalent software could
be developed, identified, licensed and integrated. Such a situation would be
likely to seriously harm Red Brick's business, operating results and financial
condition.
28
<PAGE>
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Informix Corporation ("Informix") and Red Brick Systems, Inc. ("Red Brick")
file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other
information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). You
may read and copy any reports, statements or other information filed by either
company at the Commission's public reference rooms in Washington, D.C., New York
City and Chicago. Please call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further
information on the public reference rooms. The companies' filings are also
available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the
Internet web site maintained by the Commission at http://www.sec.gov.
Informix filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration
Statement") to register with the Commission the Informix common stock to be
issued to Red Brick stockholders in the merger (the "Merger") contemplated by
the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated October 7, 1998 by and among
Informix, IC Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Informix ("Merger
Sub"), and Red Brick (the "Merger Agreement"). This Proxy Statement/Prospectus
is a part of that Registration Statement and constitutes a prospectus of
Informix in addition to being a proxy statement of Red Brick for a special
meeting of Red Brick stockholders to be held on December 30, 1998, as described
herein (the "Red Brick Special Meeting"). As allowed by the Commission's rules,
this Proxy Statement/Prospectus does not contain all of the information you can
find in the Registration Statement or the exhibits to the Registration
Statement. This Proxy Statement/Prospectus summarizes some of the documents that
are exhibits to the Registration Statement, and you should refer to the exhibits
for a more complete description of the matters covered by those documents.
Informix has supplied all information contained in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus relating to Informix, and Red Brick has supplied all such
information relating to Red Brick.
Neither Informix nor Red Brick has authorized anyone to give any information
regarding the solicitation of proxies or the offering of shares of Informix
common stock that is different from what is contained in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus. This Proxy Statement/Prospectus is not an offer to sell or
a solicitation of anyone to whom it would be unlawful to make an offer of
solicitation. You should not assume that the information contained in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus is accurate as of any time after the date of this Proxy
Statement/ Prospectus, and neither the mailing of this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus to Red Brick stockholders nor the issuance of Informix
common stock in the Merger should create any implication to the contrary.
TRADEMARKS
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus contains trademarks and trade names of
Informix, Red Brick and other companies, which are the property of their
respective owners.
29
<PAGE>
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MAY PROVE INACCURATE
This document contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to
expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. Although each of
Informix and Red Brick believes that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither can give any assurance that
such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from such expectations ("Cautionary
Statements") are disclosed herein and therein, including, without limitation in
conjunction with the forward-looking statements included under "Risk Factors."
All forward-looking statements attributable to Informix are expressly qualified
in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements described herein. All
forward-looking statements attributable to Red Brick are expressly qualified in
their entirety by the Cautionary Statements described herein.
Neither Informix nor Red Brick makes any express or implied representation
or warranty as to the attainability of the projected or estimated financial
information referenced or set forth herein under "The Plan of Merger and Related
Transactions--Opinion of Financial Advisor to Red Brick" or elsewhere herein or
as to the accuracy or completeness of the assumptions from which such projected
or estimated information is derived. Projections or estimations of Informix's
and Red Brick's future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of
uncertainty and may vary materially from actual results. Reference is made to
the particular discussions set forth under "Risk Factors," "Informix
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and "Red Brick Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations."
30
<PAGE>
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
Informix derived its information from the audited financial statements of
Informix for the years 1993 through 1997 and the unaudited financial statements
as of and for the nine months ended September 28, 1997 and September 30, 1998.
Red Brick derived its information from the audited financial statements of Red
Brick for the years 1993 through 1997 and the unaudited financial statements as
of and for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998. The unaudited
financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
accruals, which Informix and Red Brick consider necessary for a fair
presentation of their respective financial positions and results of operations
for these periods. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30,
1998 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the
entire year ending December 31, 1998 or any other period. This information is
only a summary and should be read in conjunction with each company's historical
consolidated financial statements (and related notes) contained in this
document.
INFORMIX CORPORATION
(In Thousands, Except for Per Share Data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------------
SEPTEMBER
SEPTEMBER 30, 28, DECEMBER 31,
------------- ----------- ----------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------------- ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net revenues................ $520,411 $ 482,613 $ 663,892 $ 734,540 $ 636,547 $ 451,969 $353,115
Operating income (loss)..... 35,663 (373,709) (355,742) (61,326) 68,725 77,229 83,925
Net income (loss)........... 33,144 366,061 (356,867) (73,565) 38,600 48,293 54,989
Basic earnings (loss) per
share..................... $ 0.18 $ (2.41) $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.27 $ 0.35 $ 0.42
Diluted earnings (loss) per
share..................... $ 0.17 $ (2.41) $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.26 $ 0.34 $ 0.40
Shares used to compute basic
earnings (loss) per
share..................... 165,711 151,708 151,907 149,310 145,062 137,742 130,534
Shares used to compute
diluted earnings (loss)
per share................. 171,406 151,708 151,907 149,310 150,627 142,782 137,827
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments.... $156,414 $ 155,465 $ 261,120 $ 253,209 $ 194,153 $144,383
Working capital (deficit)... (14,398) (140,148) 3,137 163,594 184,867 157,017
Total assets................ 538,344 563,244 881,988 682,445 447,769 328,001
Long-term obligations....... 4,467 6,311 2,359 2,846 892 451
Stockholders' equity........ 126,634 59,064 325,304 357,747 269,400 207,581
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(In Thousands, Except for Per Share Data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Total revenues..................... $ 25,156 $ 28,623 $ 43,315 $ 36,035 $ 20,605 $ 8,502 $ 2,564
Income (loss) from operations...... (15,585) (19,626) (18,717) 1,537 579 (1,416) (2,862)
Net income (loss).................. (15,006) (18,437) (18,023) 3,818 308 (1,481) (2,935)
Basic earnings (loss) per
share(1)......................... $ (1.20) $ (1.61) $ (1.55) $ 0.37 $ 0.22 n/a n/a
Diluted earnings (loss) per
share(1)......................... $ (1.20) $ (1.61) $ (1.55) $ 0.30 $ 0.04 n/a n/a
Shares used to compute basic
earnings (loss) per share(1)..... 12,473 11,463 11,663 10,357 1,407 n/a n/a
Shares used to compute diluted
earnings (loss) per share(1)..... 12,473 11,463 11,663 12,643 8,635 n/a n/a
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments........... $ 17,132 $ 26,909 $ 35,151 $ 2,998 $ 1,958 $ 2,747
Working capital.................... 11,681 26,132 40,308 2,613 1,554 3,553
Total assets....................... 29,170 43,565 53,368 10,977 6,510 4,887
Long-term obligations.............. 21 60 396 1,068 1,131 194
Total stockholders' equity......... 16,017 29,482 42,924 3,720 2,262 3,741
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Prior to 1995, statement of operations data omit the historical net income
per share, as it was not presented in the initial public offering
registration statement pursuant to SEC guidelines. Pro forma net income per
share is presented for 1995. Amounts for 1996 and 1995 have been restated to
comply with FAS 128 and SAB 98.
32
<PAGE>
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
The following table sets forth certain historical per share data of Informix
and Red Brick and selected unaudited pro forma combined per share data after
giving effect to the Merger as a purchase transaction. The following data should
be read in conjunction with the Summary of Consolidated Financial Data included
elsewhere in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The unaudited pro forma combined
per share data are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or
financial condition that would have been reported if the Merger had been
consummated at the beginning of the earliest period presented and should not be
construed as representative of future results of operations or financial
condition of Informix or the combined companies. Neither Informix nor Red Brick
declared any cash dividends related to their respective common stock during the
periods presented.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1997
------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
HISTORICAL--INFORMIX:
Net income (loss) per basic share..................................... $ 0.18 $ (2.36)
Net income (loss) per diluted share................................... $ 0.17 $ (2.36)
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1997
------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
HISTORICAL--RED BRICK:
Net loss per basic share.............................................. $ (1.20) $ (1.55)
Net loss per diluted share............................................ $ (1.20) $ (1.55)
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1997
------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
PRO FORMA COMBINED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE(1):
Informix share--basic................................................. $ 0.06 $ (2.40)
Informix share--diluted............................................... $ 0.06 $ (2.40)
Red Brick equivalent share--basic(2).................................. $ 0.04 $ (1.44)
Red Brick equivalent share--diluted(2)................................ $ 0.04 $ (1.44)
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
1998(3) DECEMBER 31, 1997(4)
------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
BOOK VALUE PER SHARE:
Historical--Informix(5)............................................... $ 0.69 $ 0.34
Historical--Red Brick(5).............................................. $ 1.28 $ 2.41
Pro forma combined per Informix share(6).............................. $ 0.81 $ 0.48
Pro forma per equivalent Red Brick share(2)........................... $ 0.49 $ 0.29
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------
(1) The pro forma combined net loss does not give effect to the anticipated
nonrecurring charge of approximately $4.0 million for in-process research
and development expected to result from the merger. In addition, Informix
expects to incur integration-related charges that should not exceed $10
million. The pro forma combined net income (loss) per share does not give
effect to such charges. Informix estimates they will record goodwill and
intangible assets of approximately $24.8 million associated with the merger.
The pro forma combined net income (loss) per share gives effect to the
estimated amortization expense as if such assets had been incurred as of the
beginning of the respective period.
(2) The Red Brick equivalent per share amounts are calculated by multiplying the
related combined pro forma share amounts by the Exchange Ratio of 0.6 of a
share of Informix common stock for each share of Red Brick common stock.
(3) The pro forma combined book value per share gives effect to the following
pro forma adjustments as of the respective balance sheet date: (a) $32.1
million to record the fair value of Informix common stock issued and options
and warrants exchanged to complete the merger; (b) $16.0 million to
eliminate the Red Brick stockholders' equity; and (c) $4.0 million to record
a charge for in-process research and development.
(4) The pro forma combined book value per share gives effect to the following
pro forma adjustments as of the respective balance sheet date: (a) $32.1
million to record the fair value of Informix common stock issued and options
and warrants exchanged to complete the merger; (b) $29.5 million to
eliminate the Red Brick stockholders' equity; and (c) $4.0 million to record
a charge for in-process research and development.
(5) The historical book value per share is computed by dividing stockholders'
equity by the number of shares of common stock and preferred stock
(including the preferred stock warrants), on an as if converted basis,
outstanding at the end of each period.
(6) The pro forma combined book value per share is computed by dividing pro
forma stockholders' equity by the pro forma number of shares of common stock
outstanding at the end of each period.
33
<PAGE>
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
INFORMIX
The Informix common stock has been traded on The Nasdaq National Market
under the symbol "IFMX" since October 1986. The following table sets forth for
the periods indicated the quarterly high and low closing sales prices reported
on The Nasdaq National Market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HIGH LOW
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 1998:
Fourth Quarter (through November 19)..................................... $ 6.50 $ 3.81
Third Quarter............................................................ $ 7.75 $ 3.50
Second Quarter........................................................... $ 10.06 $ 6.22
First Quarter............................................................ $ 8.81 $ 5.09
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1997:
Fourth Quarter........................................................... $ 8.03 $ 4.06
Third Quarter............................................................ $ 12.20 $ 6.28
Second Quarter........................................................... $ 15.13 $ 6.78
First Quarter............................................................ $ 24.80 $ 15.25
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996:
Fourth Quarter........................................................... $ 28.63 $ 17.63
Third Quarter............................................................ $ 30.25 $ 20.31
Second Quarter........................................................... $ 26.88 $ 18.38
First Quarter............................................................ $ 35.88 $ 26.38
</TABLE>
RED BRICK
The Red Brick common stock has been traded on The Nasdaq National Market
under the symbol "REDB" since January 1996. The following table sets forth for
the periods indicated the quarterly high and low closing prices reported on The
Nasdaq National Market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK
--------------------
HIGH LOW
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 1998:
Fourth Quarter (through November 19)..................................... $ 3.50 $ 1.88
Third Quarter............................................................ $ 4.56 $ 2.00
Second Quarter........................................................... $ 7.63 $ 3.91
First Quarter............................................................ $ 9.63 $ 5.06
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1997:
Fourth Quarter........................................................... $ 9.63 $ 5.38
Third Quarter............................................................ $ 11.00 $ 6.63
Second Quarter........................................................... $ 11.00 $ 5.88
First Quarter............................................................ $ 24.88 $ 14.00
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996:
Fourth Quarter........................................................... $ 27.50 $ 18.75
Third Quarter............................................................ $ 35.25 $ 19.00
Second Quarter........................................................... $ 60.75 $ 33.50
First Quarter (trading began January 23, 1996)........................... $ 53.75 $ 18.00
</TABLE>
RECENT SHARE PRICES
The following table sets forth the closing sales prices per share of
Informix common stock on The Nasdaq National Market and the closing sales price
per share of the Red Brick common stock on The
34
<PAGE>
Nasdaq National Market, each on (i) October 7, 1998, the last full trading date
prior to the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement (as hereinafter
defined) and the public announcement thereof, and (ii) November , 1998, the
latest practicable trading day before the printing of this Proxy Statement/
Prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INFORMIX RED BRICK
COMMON COMMON
STOCK STOCK
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
October 7, 1998......................................................... $ 4.00 $ 2.19
November , 1998....................................................... $ $
</TABLE>
No assurance can be given as to the market prices of Informix common stock
or the Red Brick common stock at any time before the closing of the Merger or as
to the market price of Informix common stock at any time thereafter. The
exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted to compensate Red Brick
stockholders for decreases in the market price of Informix common stock which
could occur before the Merger becomes effective. In the event the market price
of Informix common stock decreases or increases prior to the Effective Time (as
hereinafter defined), the market value at the Effective Time of the Informix
common stock to be received in the Merger in exchange for Red Brick common stock
would correspondingly decrease or increase. STOCKHOLDERS OF RED BRICK ARE URGED
TO OBTAIN CURRENT MARKET QUOTATIONS OF THE RED BRICK COMMON STOCK AND THE
INFORMIX COMMON STOCK.
Following the Merger, Red Brick common stock will no longer be listed on The
Nasdaq National Market.
STOCKHOLDERS
As of November 19, 1998, the record date for the Red Brick Special Meeting,
Red Brick had issued and outstanding 12,586,500 shares of Red Brick common stock
held by approximately 171 stockholders of record.
DIVIDENDS
In connection with the conversions of Informix's series B preferred stock,
Informix has paid cash dividends in the amount of $1,005,945 as of November 11,
1998. See "Description of Informix Capital Stock--Preferred Stock." Other than
such dividends, neither Informix nor Red Brick has ever declared or paid cash
dividends on their respective capital stock. Informix currently expects to
retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of its
business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Red Brick has agreed not to pay cash
dividends pending the consummation of the Merger.
35
<PAGE>
THE RED BRICK SPECIAL MEETING
GENERAL
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus is being furnished to the holders of Red
Brick common stock in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Red
Brick Board of Directors (the "Red Brick Board") for use at the Red Brick
special meeting of stockholders to be held on Wednesday, December 30, 1998 at
10:00 a.m., local time, at Hyatt Rickeys, 4219 El Camino Real, Palo Alto,
California, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof (the "Red Brick
Special Meeting"). This Proxy Statement/ Prospectus, and the accompanying Proxy
Card, are first being mailed to holders of Red Brick common stock on or about
November , 1998.
The purpose of the Red Brick Special Meeting is to consider and vote upon a
proposal (the "Merger Proposal") to approve the Merger Agreement, which sets
forth the terms and conditions of the Merger, and the transactions contemplated
thereby. Upon consummation of the Merger (the "Effective Time"), each
outstanding share of Red Brick common stock will be converted into the right to
receive the exchange ratio of 0.6 of a share of Informix common stock (the
"Exchange Ratio"), with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. In addition, as
a result of the Merger, each outstanding option to purchase Red Brick common
stock (each a "Red Brick Option") will be assumed by Informix and converted into
an option to acquire such number of shares of Informix common stock as the
holder would have been entitled to receive had such holder exercised such Red
Brick Option in full immediately prior to the Effective Time. See "The Merger
Agreement--Assumption of Stock Options."
Based on the closing sale price of Informix common stock on The Nasdaq
National Market on November , 1998, the latest practicable trading day before
the printing of this Proxy Statement/ Prospectus, the Exchange Ratio would
result in a per share purchase price for Red Brick common stock of $ .
Stockholders of Red Brick are strongly encouraged to obtain current market
quotations for the Informix common stock and the Red Brick common stock. If the
Merger is consummated, stockholders of Red Brick will no longer hold any
interest in Red Brick other than through their interest in shares of Informix
common stock. Consummation of the Merger is subject to a number of conditions,
including required regulatory approval and the required approval of the
stockholders of Red Brick.
THE RED BRICK BOARD HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE
MERGER AND BELIEVES THAT THE TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT ARE FAIR TO, AND THAT
THE MERGER IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF, RED BRICK AND ITS STOCKHOLDERS. AFTER
CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, THE RED BRICK BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT HOLDERS
OF RED BRICK COMMON STOCK VOTE FOR THE MERGER PROPOSAL.
RECORD DATE AND OUTSTANDING SHARES
Only stockholders of record of Red Brick common stock at the close of
business on November 19, 1998 (the "Record Date") are entitled to notice of and
to vote at the Red Brick Special Meeting. At the close of business on the Record
Date, there were 12,586,500 shares of Red Brick common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote, and there were approximately 171 stockholders of record of Red
Brick common stock. Each stockholder of record of Red Brick common stock is
entitled to one vote for each share of Red Brick common stock held by such
stockholder as of the Record Date.
VOTING OF PROXIES
The proxy card accompanying this Proxy Statement/Prospectus is solicited on
behalf of the Red Brick Board for use at the Red Brick Special Meeting. Whether
or not you are able to attend the Red Brick Special Meeting, you are urged to
complete, date, and sign the accompanying proxy and promptly return it in the
accompanying envelope or otherwise mail it to Red Brick. All proxies that are
properly executed and
36
<PAGE>
returned, and that are not revoked, will be voted at the Red Brick Special
Meeting in accordance with the instructions you indicate thereon. EXECUTED BUT
UNMARKED PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR APPROVAL OF THE MERGER PROPOSAL. The Red
Brick Board does not presently intend to bring any other business before the Red
Brick Special Meeting other than the Merger Proposal. So far as is known to the
Red Brick Board as of the date this Proxy Statement/Prospectus is being mailed
to holders of Red Brick common stock, no other matters are to be brought before
the Red Brick Special Meeting. As to any business that may properly come before
the Red Brick Special Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of
any motion made for adjournment of the Red Brick Special Meeting (including,
without limitation, for purposes of soliciting additional votes for approval of
the Merger Proposal), it is intended that proxies, in the form enclosed, will be
voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgment of the proxies. Any
adjournment of the Red Brick Special Meeting will require the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least a majority of the shares represented in person or by
proxy at such meeting.
A stockholder of Red Brick who has delivered a proxy to Red Brick may revoke
it at any time before it is exercised at the Red Brick Special Meeting, by (i)
filing a written notice of revocation with, or delivering a duly executed proxy
bearing a later date to Christopher G. Erickson, President, Red Brick Systems,
Inc., 485 Alberto Way, Los Gatos, California 95032, or (ii) attending the Red
Brick Special Meeting and voting in person (although attendance at the Red Brick
Special Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy). Please note, however, that
if a stockholder's shares are held of record by a broker, bank, or other nominee
and that stockholder wishes to vote at the Red Brick Special Meeting, the
stockholder must bring to the Red Brick Special Meeting a letter from the
broker, bank, or other nominee confirming that stockholder's beneficial
ownership of such shares as of the Record Date. All shares represented by a
valid proxy received prior to the Red Brick Special Meeting will be voted. All
votes will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed for the Red Brick
Special Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes,
abstentions and broker non-votes.
QUORUM REQUIRED
The Red Brick Bylaws provide that the holders of a majority of Red Brick
common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Red Brick
Special Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business at the Red Brick Special Meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for the purpose of
determining the presence of a quorum.
VOTE REQUIRED
Pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL") and the Red Brick
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, approval of the Merger Proposal
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of Red Brick common stock entitled to vote at the Red Brick Special
Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not affirmative votes and,
therefore, will have the same effect as votes against approval of the Merger
Proposal. SINCE THE REQUIRED VOTE OF THE STOCKHOLDERS OF RED BRICK IS BASED UPON
THE NUMBER OF OUTSTANDING SHARES OF RED BRICK COMMON STOCK, RATHER THAN UPON THE
SHARES ACTUALLY VOTED IN PERSON OR BY PROXY AT THE RED BRICK SPECIAL MEETING,
THE FAILURE BY THE HOLDER OF ANY SUCH SHARES EITHER TO SUBMIT A PROXY OR TO VOTE
IN PERSON AT THE RED BRICK SPECIAL MEETING WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE
AGAINST APPROVAL OF THE MERGER PROPOSAL.
THE MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE RED BRICK SPECIAL MEETING ARE OF GREAT
IMPORTANCE TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF RED BRICK. ACCORDINGLY, STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED
TO READ AND CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS PROXY
STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND TO COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN, AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE PREPAID ENVELOPE.
37
<PAGE>
All directors and executive officers of Red Brick have entered into
agreements to vote all shares over which they exercise voting control for the
approval of the Merger Proposal at the Red Brick Special Meeting. As of
September 30, 1998 such persons beneficially owned 1,433,278 shares of Red Brick
common stock (including shares which could be acquired upon stock option
exercises within 60 days of September 30, 1998), or 11.1% of the Red Brick
common stock outstanding as of such date. Notwithstanding these voting
agreements, the vote of each stockholder of Red Brick is important, and all
stockholders are encouraged to vote. See "The Merger Agreement--Related
Agreements--Voting Agreements"
ABSTENTIONS; BROKER NON-VOTES
If an executed Red Brick proxy is returned and the stockholder has
specifically abstained from voting on any matter, the shares represented by such
proxy will be considered present at the Red Brick Special Meeting for purposes
of determining a quorum. If an executed proxy is returned by a broker holding
shares in street name which indicates that the broker does not have
discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on one or more matters,
such shares will be considered present at the meeting for purposes of
determining a quorum. Since the required vote of the stockholders of Red Brick
is based on the number of outstanding shares of Red Brick common stock,
abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against
approval of the Merger Proposal.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES AND EXPENSES
Red Brick will bear the entire cost of solicitation, including the
preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
the proxy and any additional solicitation material furnished to stockholders,
except that pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the cost of printing and filing
the Proxy Statement/Prospectus is to be shared equally by Red Brick and
Informix. Copies of solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses,
fiduciaries and custodians holding shares in their names that are beneficially
owned by others so that they may forward this solicitation material to such
beneficial owners. In addition, Red Brick may reimburse such persons for their
costs of forwarding the solicitation material to such beneficial owners. The
original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by solicitation by
telephone, telegram or other means by directors, officers, employees or agents
of Red Brick. Except as noted below, no additional compensation will be paid to
these individuals for any such services. Red Brick has retained Corporate
Investor Communications, Inc. ("CIC") to assist in the solicitation of proxies.
CIC will receive a fee for such services of approximately $6,000, plus
out-of-pocket expenses, which will be paid by Red Brick. Except as described
above, Red Brick does not presently intend to solicit proxies other than by
mail.
RED BRICK STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD NOT SEND ANY STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH THEIR PROXY
CARDS. IF THE MERGER IS APPROVED, INFORMIX WILL SEND YOU WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS
FOR EXCHANGING YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATES.
38
<PAGE>
THE PLAN OF MERGER AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
THIS SECTION OF THE PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DESCRIBES CERTAIN ASPECTS OF
THE PROPOSED MERGER. THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTION DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE.
THE DISCUSSION OF THE MERGER IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS AND THE
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRINCIPAL TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO AND
QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT, A COPY OF
WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THIS PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS AS ANNEX A. ALL HOLDERS OF
RED BRICK COMMON STOCK ARE ENCOURAGED TO READ THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE OTHER
ANNEXES IN THEIR ENTIRETY.
MATERIAL CONTACTS AND BOARD DELIBERATIONS
The market for data warehousing software products and services became
increasingly competitive during the second quarter of 1998. Faced with
intensifying competition from companies with greater financial, marketing, sales
and distribution capabilities than their own, Red Brick evaluated a variety of
potential strategic alternatives, including potential business combinations,
outside financing options, and alternative strategic options as a stand-alone
company. Following such evaluation, on July 2, Red Brick engaged Morgan Stanley
& Co. Incorporated ("Morgan Stanley") to act as its financial advisor in
connection with exploring and effecting possible strategic alternatives for Red
Brick.
On August 10, Christopher G. Erickson, Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Red Brick, contacted Robert J. Finocchio, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Informix, to discuss the possibility of
a strategic combination between Red Brick and Informix, particularly in light of
Informix's recently announced strategic emphasis on the data warehousing market.
Although specific terms of a transaction were not discussed at this time,
Messrs. Erickson and Finocchio agreed to meet to discuss further the possibility
of a business combination involving the two companies.
On August 19, Messrs. Erickson and Finocchio met to discuss further the
possibility of a strategic business combination of Red Brick and Informix and
the potential benefits of such a combination. Although specific terms of a
transaction were not discussed at this time, they agreed to arrange a meeting
involving Phillip M. Fernandez, the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of Red Brick, Myron Saranga, Senior Vice President, Product Management
and Development for Informix, and other executives from Informix.
On August 19, the Red Brick Board met with Messrs. Erickson and Fernandez
and Kristi L. Smith, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Red Brick,
for a regularly-scheduled operations review meeting. Mr. Erickson briefed the
Red Brick Board on, among other matters, the initial discussions with Informix.
On August 24, John Shoch, a member of the Red Brick Board, spoke with Mr.
Finocchio regarding the possibility of a strategic combination between Red Brick
and Informix. Messrs. Shoch and Finocchio discussed the potential benefits of
such a combination but did not discuss specific financial terms of such a
combination.
On August 24 , Mr. Fernandez met with Mr. Saranga and other Informix
executives to discuss in a more detailed manner the specific potential benefits
of a business combination involving Informix and Red Brick. Financial terms of a
potential business combination between Red Brick and Informix were not discussed
during this meeting.
On August 26, Messrs. Erickson and Finocchio discussed how the parties might
further explore a potential business combination of Informix and Red Brick.
Messrs. Finocchio and Erickson agreed that Informix would undertake an initial
due diligence review of Red Brick pursuant to a confidentiality agreement.
Financial terms of a potential business combination between Red Brick and
Informix were not discussed during this conversation. On September 1, Informix
entered into a Confidentiality Agreement with Red Brick.
39
<PAGE>
Also on September 1, at a regular meeting, the Red Brick Board met with Red
Brick's legal and financial advisors and with senior management representatives
to review, among other matters, Red Brick's discussions with Informix.
From September 2 through September 17, senior executives of Red Brick and
Informix held several due diligence meetings to discuss the strategies,
capabilities and technologies of Red Brick and the potential risks and benefits
of a business combination between the parties. Financial terms of a potential
business combination between Red Brick and Informix were not discussed during
these meetings.
On September 10, the Red Brick Board met telephonically with senior
management representatives and discussed, among other matters, the status of
discussions with Informix.
On September 18, Informix faxed to Red Brick a proposed non-binding letter
of intent and term sheet regarding a potential acquisition of Red Brick by
Informix.
On September 21, at a special meeting, the Red Brick Board met with Red
Brick's financial advisors and with senior management representatives to
discuss, among other matters, Informix's letter of intent and term sheet
regarding an acquisition of Red Brick. The Red Brick Board reviewed the status
of discussions with Informix, discussed the strategic rationale for the
combination between the two companies, the benefits and risks associated with
the proposed transaction, the businesses and prospects of the companies and
other related issues.
On September 22, Mr. Finocchio, Jean-Yves Dexmier, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Informix, and Karen Blasing, Vice President,
Business Development Finance, of Informix, met with Messrs. Erickson and
Fernandez and Ms. Smith to discuss the relative valuations of the two companies
in a potential transaction. The meeting ended without agreement on financial or
other terms of a combination.
On September 23 and 24, representatives of Morgan Stanley had several
conversations with Mr. Dexmier regarding various terms of the proposed
transaction, including price and structure. These discussions ended without
agreement on financial or other terms of a combination.
On September 24, at a special meeting, the Red Brick Board met with Red
Brick's financial advisors and with senior management representatives to
discuss, among other matters, the status of negotiations with Informix.
On September 25, Messrs. Erickson and Finocchio met and discussed a
potential merger in which Red Brick would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Informix and each share of Red Brick's outstanding stock would be exchanged for
0.6 shares of Informix common stock. Messrs. Erickson and Finocchio agreed to
continue negotiating the other terms and conditions of a definitive merger
agreement based on the foregoing exchange ratio; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that Mr.
Finocchio indicated that Informix's ability to offer any such transaction would
depend on a review of the business condition of Red Brick following an in depth
due diligence review, as well as the input of Informix's financial advisors.
Similarly, Mr. Erickson indicated that Red Brick's ability to consider such a
transaction or recommend such a transaction would be subject to Red Brick's
completion of a due diligence investigation of Informix and input of Red Brick's
financial advisors.
On September 28, the Informix Board held a special telephonic meeting to
discuss the terms of the proposed acquisition of Red Brick. The Informix Board
then ratified the actions of Informix management in entering into discussions
with Red Brick and approved the terms of management's proposed offer.
From September 28 through October 7, Informix and Red Brick, together with
their respective legal, financial and accounting advisors, conducted due
diligence reviews and negotiated the terms of the definitive agreements
providing for the Merger and related transactions.
40
<PAGE>
On October 1, at a special telephonic meeting, the Red Brick Board met with
Red Brick's legal advisors and with senior management representatives to
discuss, among other matters, the status of negotiations with Informix.
On October 3, at a special meeting, the Red Brick Board met with Red Brick's
legal and financial advisors and with senior management representatives to
discuss, among other matters, the status of negotiations with Informix, the
status of Red Brick's due diligence review of Informix and the directors'
comments on the draft Merger Agreement.
On October 7, the Informix Board held a special telephonic meeting to
approve the proposed Merger. The Informix Board discussed the terms of the
Merger Agreement with Informix's management. Following that discussion, the
Board determined that the proposed Merger was in the best interests of Informix
and its stockholders, approved the Merger Agreement and authorized the officers
of Informix to enter into the Merger Agreement and related transactions.
On October 7, there was a telephonic meeting of the Red Brick Board to
approve the Merger Agreement and the related transactions. Morgan Stanley
informed the Red Brick Board of its oral opinion (subsequently confirmed in
writing) that as of such date the Exchange Ratio was fair from a financial point
of view to the holders of Red Brick common stock, and responded to various
questions raised by members of the Red Brick Board regarding such opinion. This
presentation was followed by a presentation by a member of Gunderson Dettmer
regarding the final terms of the Merger Agreement and related agreements. After
considering the terms of the proposed transaction and the opinion of Morgan
Stanley, the Red Brick Board determined that the Merger Agreement was fair to
Red Brick stockholders and that the proposed Merger was in the best interests of
Red Brick and its stockholders. The Red Brick Board then unanimously approved
the Merger and the Merger Agreement and exhibits thereto and unanimously
resolved to recommend that the stockholders of Red Brick vote for the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
REASONS FOR THE MERGER
CERTAIN STATEMENTS MADE IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL
BENEFITS THAT COULD RESULT FROM THE MERGER ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BASED
ON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS AND ENTAIL VARIOUS RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD
CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED IN SUCH
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE ANTICIPATED POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF THE MERGER MAY
NOT BE REALIZED. SUCH RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES ARE SET FORTH UNDER "RISK FACTORS"
AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS.
JOINT REASONS FOR THE MERGER
In reaching their decisions to approve the Merger Agreement, the Merger, and
the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, each of the Informix
Board and the Red Brick Board consulted with their respective management teams
and advisors and independently considered the proposed Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereunder. Based on their respective reviews of the
proposed transaction and the business and operations of the other party, the
Informix Board and the Red Brick Board each approved the Merger Agreement and
the Merger. Each board concluded that (i) the goals and philosophies of the
companies are compatible and consistent, (ii) the products of the companies are
complementary, (iii) Informix and Red Brick have the potential to offer
customers a more comprehensive database management software solution than either
could offer independently, (iv) the Merger would be positively received by
customers of each of the companies because the combination of the companies'
software products can potentially address a broader range of customer needs, and
(v) the companies' respective stockholders would benefit by the enhanced ability
of Informix and Red Brick to compete in the rapidly evolving software industry
and participate in the potential for growth of Informix and Red Brick following
the Merger.
41
<PAGE>
INFORMIX'S REASONS FOR THE MERGER
The Informix Board has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the
Merger and has identified several potential benefits of the Merger to Informix.
In addition to the anticipated joint benefits described above, the Informix
Board believes that the following are additional reasons the Merger will be
beneficial to Informix:
- Expand the capability to deliver decision support solutions through the
addition of Red Brick data warehouse consulting and research and
development expertise;
- Enhance the data warehouse technology strength in products such as
high-end data management tools and analytical data marts;
- Combine the complementary key distribution channel partnerships into one
company; and
- Offer the Red Brick installed customer base increased benefits of the
Informix global support services, integrated technology strength and
single vendor solution for data warehouses and online transaction
processing.
RED BRICK'S REASONS FOR THE MERGER
The Red Brick Board has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby. The Red Brick Board unanimously recommends
that the Red Brick stockholders vote to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement
and the Merger.
In addition to the joint benefits described above, the Red Brick Board
believes that the following are additional reasons the Merger will be beneficial
to Red Brick:
- The Merger would potentially enhance the opportunity for realization of
Red Brick's strategic objective of achieving greater scale and presence in
the data warehouse software market;
- The Merger potentially offers Red Brick an opportunity to leverage
Informix's larger sales force and more extensive distribution channel to
market its products;
- The combination with Informix would provide an opportunity for expanded
distribution of Red Brick's products to Informix's larger installed
customer base;
- The Merger potentially provides the opportunity for cost synergies through
the consolidation and integration of certain marketing, product
development, distribution and administrative operations and functions into
the existing Informix infrastructure;
- The potential for the Merger to reduce concerns among current and
potential Red Brick customers and employees regarding the financial
viability of Red Brick as an independent company; and
- The larger market capitalization of Informix compared to Red Brick and the
corresponding increase in trading liquidity of Informix common stock
compared to Red Brick common stock.
The Red Brick Board considered a number of factors relating to the Merger,
including, but not limited to the following: (i) the strategic benefits of the
Merger; (ii) historical information concerning Informix's and Red Brick's
respective businesses, prospects, financial performance and condition,
operations, technology, management and competitive position, including public
reports concerning results of operations during the most recent fiscal year and
fiscal quarter for each company filed with the Commission; (iii) Red Brick
management's view of the financial condition, results of operations and
businesses of Informix and Red Brick before and after giving effect to the
Merger; (iv) current financial market conditions and historical market prices,
volatility and trading information with respect to Informix common stock and Red
Brick common stock; (v) the consideration to be received by Red Brick
stockholders in the Merger and the relationship between the market value of the
Informix common stock to be issued in exchange for each share of Red Brick
common stock and a comparison of comparable merger transactions; (vi) the
financial and other terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and
42
<PAGE>
related agreements, including the fact that the Merger is expected to be treated
as a tax-free reorganization to Red Brick and its stockholders; (vii) Red Brick
management's view of Red Brick's prospects as an independent company; (viii) the
potential for other third parties to enter into strategic relationships with or
to acquire Informix or Red Brick; (ix) the financial analysis and performance
and other information with respect to the Merger presented by Morgan Stanley to
the Red Brick Board and the Morgan Stanley opinion dated October 7, 1998, that,
as of such date, the Exchange Ratio was fair from a financial point of view to
Red Brick's stockholders; (x) the expected impact of the Merger on Red Brick's
customers and employees; (xi) reports from Red Brick management, legal and
financial advisors as to the results of the due diligence investigation of
Informix; and (xii) the expectation that the Merger will be accounted for as a
purchase.
The Red Brick Board also identified and considered a variety of potentially
negative factors in its deliberations concerning the Merger, including, but not
limited to, (i) the risk to stockholders of Red Brick that the value to be
received in the Merger could be significantly reduced in the event of a decline
in Informix's stock price due to the fixed Exchange Ratio; (ii) the impact of
the loss of Red Brick's status as an independent company on stockholders,
employees and customers of Red Brick; (iii) the risk that the potential benefits
sought in the Merger might not be fully realized; (iv) the possibility that the
Merger might not be consummated and the potential adverse effects of public
announcement of the Merger on (a) Red Brick's sales and operating results, (b)
Red Brick's ability to attract and retain key employees, (c) progress of certain
development projects and (d) Red Brick's overall competitive position; (v) the
risk that despite the efforts of Informix and Red Brick, key technical and
management personnel might not remain employees of Informix or Red Brick; (vi)
the transaction costs expected to be incurred in connection with the Merger; and
(vii) the other risks described under "Risk Factors--Risks Related to Merger"
herein. After due consideration, the Red Brick Board concluded that the risks
associated with the proposed Merger were outweighed by the potential benefits of
the Merger.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the
Red Brick Board is not intended to be exhaustive but is believed to include all
material factors considered by the Red Brick Board. In view of the wide variety
of information and factors, both positive and negative, considered by the Red
Brick Board, the Red Brick Board did not find it practical to, and did not,
quantify or otherwise assign relative or specific weights to the foregoing
factors considered. After taking into consideration all of the factors set forth
above, the Red Brick Board concluded that the Merger was in the best interests
of Red Brick and its stockholders.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE RED BRICK BOARD
THE RED BRICK BOARD HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE
MERGER, AND BELIEVES THAT THE TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT ARE FAIR TO, AND
THAT THE MERGER IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF, RED BRICK AND ITS STOCKHOLDERS AND
THEREFORE RECOMMENDS THAT THE HOLDERS OF RED BRICK COMMON STOCK VOTE FOR
APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE MERGER. See
"--Reasons for the Merger." Certain members of the Red Brick Board may be deemed
to have a conflict of interest in recommending stockholder approval of the
Merger. See "--Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger."
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO RED BRICK
Pursuant to a letter agreement dated as of July 2, 1998 (the "Engagement
Letter"), Morgan Stanley was engaged to provide financial advisory services
including the provision of a financial fairness opinion in connection with the
Merger. Morgan Stanley was selected by the Red Brick Board to act as its
financial advisor based on Morgan Stanley's qualifications, expertise and
reputation and its knowledge of the business and affairs of Red Brick. At the
meeting of the Red Brick Board on October 7, 1998, Morgan Stanley rendered its
oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of such date, based
upon and subject to the various considerations set forth in the opinion, the
Exchange Ratio pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point
of view to the holders of the Red Brick common stock.
43
<PAGE>
THE FULL TEXT OF THE WRITTEN OPINION OF MORGAN STANLEY DATED OCTOBER 7,
1998, WHICH SETS FORTH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, ASSUMPTIONS MADE, PROCEDURES
FOLLOWED, MATTERS CONSIDERED AND LIMITATIONS ON THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW
UNDERTAKEN BY MORGAN STANLEY IN RENDERING ITS OPINION, IS ATTACHED TO THIS PROXY
STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AS ANNEX B. RED BRICK STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO, AND
SHOULD, READ THE OPINION CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE MORGAN STANLEY
OPINION IS DIRECTED TO THE RED BRICK BOARD AND ADDRESSES ONLY THE FAIRNESS OF
THE EXCHANGE RATIO PURSUANT TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF
VIEW AS OF THE DATE OF THE OPINION, AND DOES NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER ASPECT OF THE
MERGER NOR DOES IT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY HOLDER OF RED BRICK COMMON
STOCK AS TO HOW TO VOTE AT THE RED BRICK SPECIAL MEETING. THE SUMMARY OF THE
MORGAN STANLEY OPINION SET FORTH IN THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FULL TEXT OF SUCH OPINION.
In rendering its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among other things: (i) reviewed
certain publicly available financial statements and other information of Red
Brick and Informix, respectively; (ii) reviewed certain internal financial
statements and other financial and operating data concerning Red Brick prepared
by the management of Red Brick; (iii) discussed the past and current operations
and financial condition and the prospects of Red Brick and Informix, including
information relating to certain strategic, financial and operational benefits
anticipated from the Merger, with senior executives of Red Brick and Informix,
respectively; (iv) reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for the Red
Brick common stock and Informix common stock; (v) reviewed the pro forma impact
of the Merger on Informix's earnings per share; (vi) compared the financial
performance of Red Brick and the prices and trading activity of the Red Brick
common stock and Informix common stock with that of certain other comparable
publicly-traded companies and their securities; (vii) reviewed the financial
terms, to the extent publicly available, of certain comparable transactions;
(viii) reviewed and discussed with the managements of Red Brick and Informix and
their outside advisors certain contingent liabilities of Informix; (ix)
participated in discussions and negotiations among representatives of Red Brick
and Informix and their financial and legal advisors; (x) reviewed the draft
Merger Agreement dated October 5, 1998 and certain related agreements; and (xi)
considered such other factors and performed such other analysis as Morgan
Stanley deemed appropriate.
Morgan Stanley assumed and relied upon, without independent verification,
the accuracy and completeness of the information reviewed by it for the purposes
of the Morgan Stanley opinion. With respect to the financial and operating data,
including information relating to the strategic, financial and operational
benefits anticipated from the Merger, Morgan Stanley assumed that they were
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments of the future financial performance of Red Brick. Morgan Stanley
also relied upon, without independent verification, the assessment by the
managements of Red Brick and Informix of the strategic and other benefits
expected to result from the Merger. Morgan Stanley also relied upon, without
independent verification, the assessment by the managements of Red Brick and
Informix of Red Brick's and Informix's technologies and products, and the risks
associated with Red Brick's and Informix's existing and future products and
technologies. Additionally, Morgan Stanley assumed that the Merger will be
consummated in accordance to the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement,
including, among other things, that the Merger would be treated as a tax-free
reorganization and/or exchange, each pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of
1986. Morgan Stanley did not make any independent valuation or appraisal of the
assets or liabilities of Red Brick, nor was Morgan Stanley furnished with any
such appraisals. In addition, with the consent of Red Brick management, Morgan
Stanley relied upon the assessment by the managements of Red Brick and Informix
and their outside advisors with respect to certain contingent liabilities of
Informix. Morgan Stanley's opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to it as of, the date of the Morgan Stanley opinion.
44
<PAGE>
The following is a brief summary of the analysis performed by Morgan Stanley
in connection with its oral opinion and the preparation of its opinion letter
dated October 7, 1998.
COMPARATIVE STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE
As part of its analysis, Morgan Stanley reviewed the recent stock price
performance of Red Brick and Informix and compared such performance with that of
a broader group of technology companies. The group included those companies
comprising the Morgan Stanley High Technology 35 Index (collectively, the "MS
High Tech Index"). Morgan Stanley observed that over the period from October 2,
1997 to October 2, 1998, the market price of Red Brick common stock depreciated
73%, compared with a depreciation of 33% for Informix, an appreciation of 4% for
the MS High Tech Index and an appreciation of 4% for the S&P 500.
PEER GROUP COMPARISON
Morgan Stanley compared certain financial information of Informix with
publicly available information of a group of relational database software
companies including Oracle Corporation, NCR Corporation, and Sybase Inc.
(collectively, the "Relational Database Companies"). In particular, such
analysis showed that as of October 2, 1998, based on earnings per share
projections from securities research analysts, Informix traded at a multiple of
21.7 times calendar year 1998 earnings, compared to a median of 23.5 times for
the Relational Database Companies. Informix traded at a multiple of 13.8 times
calendar year 1999 estimated earnings based on projections from securities
research analysts, compared to a median of 17.2 times for the Relational
Database Companies. The analysis also showed that as of October 2, 1998,
Informix's calendar year 1999 Price to Earnings Ratio, derived from securities
research analysts projections, divided by its estimated Long Term Growth Rate
was 1.1, compared to 1.2 for the Relational Database Companies. No company
utilized as a comparison in the comparable companies analysis is identical to
Red Brick or Informix. In evaluating the comparable companies, Morgan Stanley
made judgements and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general
business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of Red Brick and Informix, such as the impact of
competition on Red Brick or Informix and the industry generally, industry growth
and the absence of any adverse material change in the financial condition and
prospects of Red Brick or Informix or the industry or in the financial markets
in general. Mathematical analysis (such as determining the average or median) is
not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable companies data.
ANALYSIS OF SELECTED PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS
As part of its analysis, Morgan Stanley reviewed 5 transactions
(collectively, the "Software Transactions"). Morgan Stanley compared certain
statistics for the Software Transactions to the relevant financial statistics
for Red Brick based on the value of Red Brick implied by the Exchange Ratio and
the closing price for Red Brick common stock as of October 2, 1998. Analysis of
the Software Transactions showed multiples of latest twelve months revenues
ranging from a low of 0.4 to a high of 1.8 times. These compared to a multiple
of 0.5 times latest twelve months revenue for Red Brick based on the Exchange
Ratio and the closing stock price of the Informix stock as of October 2, 1998.
No transaction utilized as a comparison in the comparable transactions analysis
is identical to the Merger. In evaluating the precedent transactions, Morgan
Stanley made judgements and assumptions with regard to industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters,
many of which are beyond the control of Red Brick and Informix, such as the
impact of competition on Red Brick or Informix and the industry generally,
industry growth and the absence of any adverse material change in the financial
condition and prospects of Red Brick or Informix or the industry or in the
financial markets in general. Mathematical analysis (such as determining the
average or median) is not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable
transaction data.
45
<PAGE>
EXCHANGE RATIO ANALYSIS
Morgan Stanley reviewed the ratios of the closing stock prices of Informix
common stock to Red Brick common stock over various periods during the three
month period ending October 2, 1998 and computed the premiums represented by the
Exchange Ratio over the averages of these daily ratios over various periods. The
averages of these ratios of the closing prices of Red Brick and Informix were
0.437 for the 5 trading days preceding October 5, 1998, 0.443 for the preceding
10 trading days, 0.510 for the preceding 30 trading days, 0.469 for the
preceding 60 trading days, and 0.533 for the preceding 90 trading days. The
Exchange Ratio represented premiums of 37%, 35%, 18%, 28%, and 13%,
respectively, over the aforementioned average exchange ratios of the Informix
and Red Brick stock prices.
PRO FORMA MERGER ANALYSIS
Morgan Stanley analyzed the pro forma impact of the Merger on Informix's
projected earnings per share for the calendar year 1999. Such analysis was based
on projections by the management of Red Brick and on securities research analyst
forecasts for Informix. Morgan Stanley observed that, assuming that the Merger
was treated as a purchase transaction with a 30% in-process research and
development write-off, the Merger would result in earnings per share dilution
for Informix of 3.5% in calendar year 1999 before taking into account any
synergies. Morgan Stanley noted that, based on the earnings projections, the
Merger would result in earnings per share accretion for Informix stockholders in
the fourth quarter of 1999 before taking into account any synergies.
DISCOUNTED EQUITY VALUE
Morgan Stanley performed an analysis of the present value of the implied
value of Red Brick based on Red Brick's future trading price assuming
consummation of the Merger and based on securities research analyst projections
for both Red Brick and Informix for calendar year 1999, illustrative multiples
of earnings per share ranging from 18.0 times to 22.0 times and illustrative
discount rates of ranging from 17.5% to 25.0%. Based on this analysis, Morgan
Stanley estimated a present value of Red Brick common stock ranging from $29
million to $40 million. Morgan Stanley compared this range to the stand-alone
discounted equity value of Red Brick. Morgan Stanley observed that, based on
securities research analyst projections for revenues in calendar year 1999,
illustrative multiples of revenue ranging from 0.3 times to 0.8 times and
illustrative discount rates ranging from 13.7% to 25.0%, the present value of
Red Brick on a stand-alone basis ranged from $21 million to $35 million.
In connection with the review of the Merger by the Red Brick Board, Morgan
Stanley performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses for purposes
of its opinion given in connection therewith. While the foregoing summary
describes the analyses and factors reviewed by Morgan Stanley in connection with
its opinion, it does not purport to be a complete description of all the
analyses performed by Morgan Stanley in connection with its opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its
opinion, Morgan Stanley considered the results of all of its analyses as a whole
and did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered
by it. Furthermore, selecting any portion of its analyses, without considering
all analyses, would create an incomplete view of the process underlying its
opinion. In addition, Morgan Stanley may have given various analyses and factors
more or less weight than other analyses and factors, and may have deemed various
assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions, so that the ranges of
valuations resulting from any particular analysis described above should not be
taken to be Morgan Stanley's view of the actual value of Red Brick or Informix.
In performing its analyses, Morgan Stanley made numerous assumptions with
respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and
other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Red Brick or Informix.
Any estimates contained herein are not necessarily indicative of future results
or actual values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those
suggested by such estimates. The analyses performed were prepared solely as part
of Morgan Stanley's analysis of the fairness of the Exchange Ratio pursuant to
the
46
<PAGE>
Merger Agreement from a financial point of view to the holders of shares of Red
Brick common stock and were conducted in connection with the delivery of the
Morgan Stanley opinion. The analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to
reflect the prices at which Red Brick or Informix might actually be sold. The
Exchange Ratio pursuant to the Merger was determined through arm's-length
negotiations between Red Brick and Informix and was approved by the Red Brick
Board. Morgan Stanley did not recommend any specific exchange ratio to Red Brick
or that any specific exchange ratio constituted the only appropriate exchange
ratio for the Merger.
The Red Brick Board retained Morgan Stanley based upon Morgan Stanley's
qualifications, experience and expertise. Morgan Stanley is an internationally
recognized investment banking and advisory firm. Morgan Stanley, as part of its
investment banking business, is continuously engaged in the valuation of
businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of
listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate
and other purposes. In addition, Morgan Stanley is a full-service securities
firm engaged in securities trading, brokerage and financing activities. In the
ordinary course of Morgan Stanley's trading and brokerage activities, Morgan
Stanley or its affiliates may at any time hold long or short positions, may
trade or otherwise effect transactions, for its own account or for the account
of customers in the equity securities of Red Brick or Informix.
Pursuant to the Engagement Letter, Morgan Stanley provided financial
advisory services and a financial opinion in connection with the Merger, and Red
Brick agreed to pay Morgan Stanley a customary fee in connection therewith. Red
Brick has also agreed to reimburse Morgan Stanley for reasonable expenses
incurred. In addition, Red Brick has also agreed to indemnify Morgan Stanley and
its affiliates, their respective directors, officers, agents and employees and
each person, if any, controlling Morgan Stanley or any of its affiliates against
certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities, under the
federal securities laws, related to Morgan Stanley's engagement. In the past,
Morgan Stanley and its affiliates have provided financial advisory and financing
services for Red Brick and Informix and have received fees for the rendering of
these services.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
In considering the recommendation of the Red Brick Board with respect to the
Merger Agreement, holders of Red Brick common stock should be aware that members
of the Red Brick Board and the executive officers of Red Brick have certain
interests in the Merger that are in addition to the interests of holders of Red
Brick common stock generally. These interests are more fully described below and
include certain employment arrangements with Informix, severance arrangements,
the acceleration of the vesting of certain options to acquire Red Brick common
stock and certain rights of indemnification.
INTEREST IN RED BRICK COMMON STOCK AND RED BRICK OPTIONS
As of September 30, 1998, the executive officers and directors of Red Brick
beneficially owned an aggregate of 1,433,278 shares of Red Brick common stock
(including 403,991 shares of Red Brick common stock subject to Red Brick Options
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998). Based upon the closing sale
price of Informix common stock on November , 1998, the latest practicable
trading day before the printing of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus, and assuming
the exercise of outstanding Red Brick Options exercisable within 60 days of
September 30, 1998, the aggregate dollar value of Informix common stock to be
received in the Merger by the executive officers and directors of Red Brick is
approximately $ .
STOCK OPTION PLANS
Under the Red Brick 1995 Stock Option Plan ("1995 Option Plan"), options
granted to John Shoch and Andrew Ludwick as members of the Red Brick Board after
the initial public offering of Red Brick will
47
<PAGE>
become fully exercisable and vested in connection with the Merger. Officers of
Red Brick, including Christopher Erickson, Andrew Priest, Ron Barale, Phillip
Fernandez, Paul Rodwick, Lawrence Howard, Kristi Smith, and Peggy DeLeon
(collectively, the "Red Brick Officers"), hold outstanding options granted under
the 1995 Option Plan. Pursuant to the 1995 Option Plan and Red Brick's
Supplemental Stock Option Plan ("Supplemental Option Plan") and the Merger
Agreement, Informix will substitute new options to purchase shares of Informix
common stock in exchange for all outstanding options under the 1995 Option Plan
and Supplemental Option Plan and such new options will be exercisable for a
number of shares of Informix common stock equal to the number of shares of Red
Brick common stock purchasable under the original option multiplied by the
Exchange Ratio and rounded down to the nearest whole number and at an exercise
price calculated by dividing the original exercise price by the Exchange Ratio
and rounding up to the nearest whole cent. Each officer, employee or consultant
who exercises his or her Red Brick options prior to the Merger will receive in
the Merger shares of Informix common stock, which stock will be freely tradable
immediately following the consummation of the Merger, subject only to the
limitations set forth under Rule 145 under the Securities Act of 1933 and
contractual restrictions on the Red Brick Officer's ability to resell the
Informix common stock. See "The Merger Agreement--Related Agreements--Affiliate
Agreements."
In the event that the employment of a Red Brick Officer is Involuntarily
Terminated (as defined below) within 12 months following the Merger, then under
the terms of the 1995 Option Plan, the exercisability or vesting of each
outstanding option held by such officer will automatically accelerate and the
Red Brick Officer will have up to a one year period from the date of the
Involuntary Termination in which to exercise the option. "Involuntary
Termination" is defined in the 1995 Option Plan to include an involuntary
dismissal or discharge for reasons other than misconduct or voluntary
resignation following a change in position which materially reduces the
individual's level of responsibility, a reduction by more than 15% in the
individual's compensation or relocation. Identical acceleration provisions apply
to employees holding options granted under the 1995 Option Plan and Supplemental
Option Plan.
As of September 30, 1998, options to purchase a total of 4,529,350 shares of
Red Brick common stock, at exercise prices ranging from $0.16 to $25.25 per
share, were held by approximately 291 Red Brick employees. Options held by
former employees of Red Brick are not eligible for accelerated vesting.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Red Brick's Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") and the Merger Agreement
provide that, prior to the Effective Time, all outstanding purchase rights under
the ESPP will be exercised upon the earlier of January 29, 1999 or immediately
prior to the Effective Time, provided that if the Effective Time is later than
January 31, 1999, then a new Purchase Period (as defined in the ESPP) will
commence on February 1, 1999 and will end upon the earlier of July 31, 1999 or
immediately prior to the Effective Time, and each participant in the ESPP will
be issued shares of Red Brick common stock at that time pursuant to the terms of
the ESPP and each share of Red Brick common stock so issued shall by virtue of
the Merger be converted into the right to receive 0.6 shares of Informix common
stock. Some of the Red Brick Officers contribute through payroll deduction to
the ESPP and will purchase a maximum of 1,000 shares of Red Brick common stock
immediately prior to consummation of the Merger.
SEVERANCE PLANS
Each of the Red Brick Officers is eligible for certain severance benefits
under the Officers Severance Plan ("Officers Severance Plan") upon the Red Brick
Officer's termination of employment without cause provided the officer executes
a general release of claims in favor of Red Brick. Under the Officers Severance
Plan, unless the Red Brick Officer accepts employment with Informix, he or she
shall be entitled to 12 months salary plus 12 months acceleration of vesting of
the officer's options and unvested shares. Also, if the officer's employment is
voluntarily or involuntarily terminated following a change in control, then the
Red Brick Officer will be entitled to 12 months salary plus 12 months
acceleration of vesting of
48
<PAGE>
the officer's options and unvested shares. The Merger will constitute a Change
in Control for purposes of the Officers Severance Plan. Pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, the Officer Severance Plan will be amended to provide that benefits
will only be payable if an officer's employment is terminated within 90 days of
the closing of the Merger, including a termination that occurs because the
officer does not accept a position.
Red Brick also maintains the Red Brick Systems, Inc. Severance Plan (the
"Employee Severance Plan") pursuant to which all non-officer employees are
eligible for certain severance benefits upon involuntary termination of
employment without cause provided the employee executes a general release of
claims in favor of Red Brick. Under the Employee Severance Plan, an
involuntarily terminated Red Brick employee will be entitled to a number of
weeks of salary calculated pursuant to a formula that ranges from a minimum of
two weeks of salary to four weeks of salary plus one day of salary for each
month of employment. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Employee Severance
Plan will be amended to provide that benefits will only be payable if an
employee's employment is terminated within 90 days of the closing of the Merger.
Red Brick has entered into change in control letter agreements with certain
employees, who are not Red Brick Officers, which provide for payment of
severance benefits provided the eligible employee remains employed through
announcement of any change in control and their employment is then terminated by
Red Brick or the successor corporation within three months before or after the
change in control. The amount of severance pay is 12 months of base salary.
Separation pay will be paid in a lump sum after employment ends.
Red Brick has also entered into stay bonus letter agreements with certain
employees, who are not Red Brick Officers, which provide for payment of bonuses
provided the eligible employees remain employed through the 60th day following
closing of any change in control (or any earlier date designated by management
of Red Brick). The amount of stay bonus is either 20% or 40% of base salary.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Merger Agreement provides that following the Effective Time, Informix
will grant all Red Brick employees credit for all service (to the same extent as
service with Informix is taken into account with respect to similarly situated
employees of Informix) with Red Brick prior to the Effective Time for purposes
of vesting and vacation accrual. Informix has also agreed, to the extent
permitted under its plans, to waive any pre-existing condition exclusion and
actively-at-work requirements under Informix's benefit plans.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH PHILLIP FERNANDEZ
Effective upon the consummation of the Merger, Informix has made an offer of
employment to Phillip Fernandez. Mr. Fernandez is Red Brick's Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer and will become a Vice President of
Informix pursuant to the employment agreement. The employment agreement provides
that Mr. Fernandez will receive a salary of $27,500 per month. Upon closing of
the Merger, Mr. Fernandez will also receive from Informix $225,000 in lieu of a
severance benefit under the Officers Severance Plan, and Mr. Fernandez's options
shall accelerate as to the number of shares equal to the one year of additional
option vesting, which is the same benefit provided to terminated officers
pursuant to the Officers Severance Plan. In addition, Mr. Fernandez's options
shall fully accelerate upon the termination of his employment with Informix
provided such termination occurs six or more months after the Effective Time or
upon the sooner termination of his employment due to death or disability.
INDEMNIFICATION ARRANGEMENTS
Informix has agreed to maintain, with certain limitations, the directors'
and officers' liability insurance policies maintained by Red Brick or to provide
comparable coverage for a period of four years from the
49
<PAGE>
Effective Time. Informix has also agreed to cause Red Brick following the Merger
to honor all of Red Brick's indemnification obligations to all present and
former officers and directors of Red Brick.
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion summarizes certain material federal income tax
considerations relevant to the Merger that are applicable to holders of Red
Brick common stock. This discussion is based on currently existing provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), existing treasury
regulations thereunder and current administrative rulings and court decisions,
all of which are subject to change. Any such change, which may or may not be
retroactive, could alter the tax consequences to Informix, Red Brick or Red
Brick's stockholders as described herein.
Red Brick stockholders should be aware that this discussion does not deal
with all federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to particular
Red Brick stockholders in light of their particular circumstances, such as
stockholders who are dealers in securities, who are subject to the alternative
minimum tax provisions of the Code, who are foreign persons or entities, who are
financial institutions or insurance companies, who do not hold their Red Brick
shares as capital assets, who acquired their shares in connection with stock
option or stock purchase plans or in other compensatory transactions, who hold
Red Brick common stock as part of an integrated investment (including a
"straddle") comprised of shares of Red Brick common stock and one or more other
positions, or who may hold Red Brick common stock subject to the constructive
sale provisions of Section 1259 of the Code. In addition, the following
discussion does not address the tax consequences of the Merger under foreign,
state or local tax laws, the tax consequences of transactions effectuated prior
or subsequent to, or concurrently with, the Merger (whether or not any such
transactions are undertaken in connection with the Merger), including without
limitation any transaction in which Red Brick shares are acquired or shares of
Informix common stock are disposed of, or the tax consequences to holders of
options, warrants or similar rights to acquire Red Brick common stock, including
the assumption by Informix of outstanding options and subscriptions to acquire
Red Brick common stock. ACCORDINGLY, RED BRICK STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT
THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER,
INCLUDING THE APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES TO
THEM OF THE MERGER.
Consummation of the Merger is conditioned upon receipt by Informix and Red
Brick of opinions (the "Tax Opinions") from their respective counsel, Wilson
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, and Gunderson Dettmer
Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian, LLP, that the Merger should constitute a
"reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code (a
"Reorganization"). Assuming the Merger is a Reorganization, then, subject to the
assumptions, limitations and qualifications referred to herein and in the Tax
Opinions, the Merger should result in the following federal income tax
consequences:
(i) No gain or loss should be recognized by holders of Red Brick common
stock solely upon their receipt in the Merger of Informix common stock in
exchange therefor (except to the extent of cash received in lieu of a fractional
share of Informix common stock).
(ii) The aggregate tax basis of the Informix common stock received by Red
Brick stockholders in the Merger (including any fractional share of Informix
common stock not actually received) should be the same as the aggregate tax
basis of the Red Brick common stock surrendered in exchange therefor.
(iii) The holding period of the Informix common stock received by each Red
Brick stockholder in the Merger should include the period for which the Red
Brick common stock surrendered in exchange therefor was considered to be held,
provided that the Red Brick common stock so surrendered is held as a capital
asset at the time of the Merger.
50
<PAGE>
(iv) Cash payments received by holders of Red Brick common stock in lieu of
a fractional share should be treated as if such fractional share of Informix
common stock had been issued in the Merger and then redeemed by Informix. A Red
Brick stockholder receiving such cash should recognize gain or loss with respect
to such payment, measured by the difference (if any) between the amount of cash
received and the basis in such fractional share.
(v) None of Informix, Merger Sub or Red Brick should recognize gain or loss
solely as a result of the Merger.
Even if the Merger qualifies as a Reorganization, a recipient of shares of
Informix common stock could recognize gain to the extent that such shares were
considered to be received in exchange for services or property (other than
solely Red Brick common stock). All or a portion of such gain may be taxable as
ordinary income. Gain could also have to be recognized to the extent that an Red
Brick stockholder was treated as receiving (directly or indirectly)
consideration other than Informix common stock in exchange for such
stockholder's Red Brick common stock.
The parties will not request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the
"IRS") in connection with the Merger. Red Brick stockholders should be aware
that the Tax Opinions do not bind the IRS and the IRS is therefore not precluded
from successfully asserting a contrary opinion. In addition, the Tax Opinions
are subject to certain assumptions, limitations and qualifications, including
but not limited to the truth and accuracy of certain representations made by
Informix, Red Brick and Merger Sub in certain certificates to be delivered to
counsel by the respective managements of Informix, Red Brick and Merger Sub.
A successful IRS challenge to the Reorganization status of the Merger as a
result of a failure to meet any of the requirements of a Reorganization would
result in Red Brick stockholders recognizing taxable gain or loss with respect
to each share of Red Brick common stock surrendered equal to the difference
between the stockholder's basis in such share and the fair market value, as of
the Effective Time, of the Informix common stock received in exchange therefor.
In such event, a stockholder's aggregate basis in the Informix common stock so
received would equal its fair market value as of the Effective Time, and the
stockholder's holding period for such stock would begin the day after the
Merger.
NO APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Section 262 of the DGCL provides appraisal rights (sometimes referred to as
"dissenters' rights") to stockholders of Delaware corporations in certain
situations. However, Section 262 appraisal rights are not available to
stockholders of a corporation (i) whose securities are listed on a national
securities exchange or are designated as a national market system security on an
interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. ("NASD") and (ii) whose stockholders are not required to accept in exchange
for their stock anything other than (A) stock of another corporation listed on a
national securities exchange or on an interdealer quotation system by the NASD
and (B) cash in lieu of fractional shares. Because Red Brick's common stock is
traded on such a system, the Nasdaq National Market, and because the Red Brick
stockholders are being offered (A) stock of Informix, which is also traded on
the Nasdaq National Market, and (B) cash in lieu of fractional shares,
stockholders of Red Brick will not have appraisal rights with respect to the
Merger. The DGCL does not provide appraisal rights to stockholders of a
corporation, such as Informix, which issues shares in connection with a merger
but is not itself a constituent corporation in the Merger.
51
<PAGE>
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
THE FOLLOWING IS A BRIEF SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE MERGER
AGREEMENT, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED AS ANNEX A TO THIS PROXY
STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. SUCH SUMMARY IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT. STOCKHOLDERS OF
RED BRICK ARE URGED TO READ THE MERGER AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY FOR A MORE
COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE MERGER. IN THE CASE OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE
TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE SUMMARY SET FORTH HEREIN, THE MERGER
AGREEMENT WILL CONTROL.
THE MERGER
The Merger Agreement provides that, following the approval and adoption of
the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Red Brick and the satisfaction or
waiver of the other conditions to the Merger, Merger Sub will be merged with and
into Red Brick, with Red Brick continuing as the surviving corporation and
becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Informix (the "Surviving Corporation").
EFFECTIVE TIME
Subject to the provisions of the Merger Agreement, Informix, Red Brick and
Merger Sub shall cause the Merger to be consummated by the concurrent filing, as
soon as practicable on or after the Closing (as hereafter defined), of a
certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in
accordance with the relevant provisions of Delaware law. The closing of the
Merger (the "Closing") shall take place at the offices of Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich and Rosati, Professional Corporation, at a time and date to be
specified by the parties, which shall be no later than the second business day
after the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the Merger
Agreement, or at such other time, date and location as Informix and Red Brick
agree in writing. The Closing is anticipated to occur on or about December 30,
1998.
CONVERSION OF SHARES IN THE MERGER
At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the
part of Merger Sub, Red Brick or any of their security holders, each share of
Red Brick common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time will be canceled and extinguished and
automatically converted into the right to receive 0.6 shares of the common stock
of Informix, $0.01 par value (the "Exchange Ratio"), upon surrender of the
certificate representing such share of Red Brick common stock in the manner
provided in the Merger Agreement (or in the case of a lost, stolen or destroyed
certificate, upon delivery of an affidavit (and bond, if required)). However,
each share of Red Brick common stock held by Red Brick or owned by Merger Sub,
Informix or any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Red Brick or
Informix immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be canceled and
extinguished without any conversion thereof.
The Exchange Ratio shall be adjusted to reflect appropriately the effect of
any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend (including any dividend or
distribution of securities convertible into Informix common stock or Red Brick
common stock), reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification or other like
change with respect to Informix common stock or Red Brick common stock occurring
on or after the date hereof and prior to the Effective Time.
No fraction of a share of Informix common stock will be issued by virtue of
the Merger, but in lieu thereof, each holder of shares of Red Brick common stock
who would otherwise be entitled to a fraction of a share of Informix common
stock (after aggregating all fractional shares of Informix common stock that
otherwise would be received by such holder) shall be entitled to receive from
Informix an amount of cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) equal to the
product of (i) such fraction and (ii) the average of the last reported sale
prices of Informix common stock for the five (5) most recent days that Informix
common stock has traded ending on the trading day immediately prior to the
Effective Time, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
52
<PAGE>
Promptly after the Effective Time, Informix, acting thought the Exchange
Agent, will deliver to each Red Brick stockholder of record as of such date a
letter of transmittal with instructions to be used by such stockholder in
surrendering certificates which, prior to the Merger, represented shares of Red
Brick common stock and which, pursuant to the Merger, will be exchanged for
shares of Informix common stock. CERTIFICATES SHOULD NOT BE SURRENDERED BY THE
HOLDERS OF RED BRICK COMMON STOCK UNTIL SUCH HOLDERS RECEIVE THE LETTER OF
TRANSMITTAL FROM THE EXCHANGE AGENT.
ASSUMPTION OF STOCK OPTIONS
At the Effective Time, each outstanding option to purchase shares of Red
Brick common stock (each, a "Red Brick Stock Option") under Red Brick's 1995
Stock Option Plan (including options granted under the predecessor 1991 Stock
Option Plan) and Supplemental Stock Option Plan, whether or not exercisable, and
whether or not vested, shall by virtue of the Merger and without any further
action on the part of Red Brick or the holder thereof, be assumed by Informix in
such manner that Informix (i) is "assuming a stock option in a transaction to
which Section 424(a) applied" within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code, or
(ii) to the extent that Section 424 of the Code does not apply to any such Red
Brick stock option, would be a transaction within Section 424 of the Code. Each
Red Brick Stock Option so assumed by Informix will continue to have, and be
subject to, the same terms and conditions of such options immediately prior to
the Effective Time, except that each option will be or become exercisable for a
certain number of shares of Informix common stock rather than shares of Red
Brick common stock, as adjusted to reflect the Exchange Ratio, and at an
exercise price adjusted to reflect the Exchange Ratio.
EFFECT OF THE MERGER
Once the Merger is consummated, Merger Sub will cease to exist as a
corporation, and all of the business, assets, liabilities and obligations of
Merger Sub will be merged into Red Brick with Red Brick remaining as the
surviving corporation. Following the Merger, Red Brick will continue to operate
independently as a wholly owned subsidiary of Informix. The stockholders of Red
Brick will become stockholders of Informix, and their rights as stockholders
will be governed by the Informix Certificate of Incorporation, the Informix
Bylaws and the laws of the state of Delaware.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Certificate of Incorporation of Merger
Sub in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time will become the
Certificate of Incorporation of the surviving corporation; PROVIDED, HOWEVER,
that such Certificate of Incorporation shall be amended to change the name of
the Surviving Corporation to Red Brick Systems, Inc. and the bylaws of Merger
Sub will become the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation. At the Effective Time,
the board of directors of the Surviving Corporation will consist of the
directors who were serving as directors of Merger Sub immediately prior to the
Effective Time. The officers of Merger Sub immediately prior to the Effective
Time will remain as officers of the Surviving Corporation, until their
successors are duly appointed.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The Merger Agreement contains various representations and warranties of
Informix, Red Brick and Merger Sub relating to, among other things, (i) their
incorporation, existence, good standing, corporate power and similar corporate
matters; (ii) their capitalization; (iii) their authorization, execution,
delivery and performance and the enforceability of the Merger Agreement and
related matters; (iv) the absence of conflicts, violations and defaults under
their corporate charters and bylaws and certain other agreements and documents;
(v) their pending or threatened litigation; and (vi) the absence of any
occurrence or event that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on the assets, business, financial condition, operations or prospects (a
"Material Adverse Effect") of Red Brick, Informix or Merger Sub, as applicable.
Red Brick has provided certain additional representations and warranties
relating to, among other things, (i) certain of its audited financial
statements; (ii) the absence of undisclosed liabilities;
53
<PAGE>
(iii) ownership of its properties; (iv) material contracts and no defaults
thereunder; (v) its Intellectual Property Rights; (vi) tax matters; (vii) its
employee benefits plans; (viii) its Rights Plan; (ix) its insurance coverage;
and (x) environmental matters.
Informix and Merger Sub have also provided certain additional
representations and warranties as to documents and reports filed by Informix
with the Commission and the accuracy and completeness thereof.
All representations and warranties of Informix, Red Brick and Merger Sub
expire at the Effective Time.
CONDUCT OF INFORMIX'S AND RED BRICK'S BUSINESS PRIOR TO THE MERGER
During the period from the date of the Merger Agreement and continuing until
the earlier of the termination of the Merger Agreement pursuant to its terms or
the Effective Time, Red Brick agrees (except to the extent that Informix shall
otherwise consent in writing) to carry on its business and to cause its
subsidiaries to carry on their business in the ordinary course in substantially
the same manner as heretofore conducted and in compliance in all material
respects with all applicable laws and regulations, to pay their debts and taxes
when due (subject to good faith disputes over such debts or taxes), to pay or
perform other material obligations when due, and to use all reasonable efforts
consistent with past practice and policies to preserve intact their present
business organizations, keep available the services of their present officers
and key employees, and preserve their relationships with customers, suppliers,
distributors, licensors, licensees, and others having business dealings with
them, all with the goal of preserving unimpaired the goodwill and ongoing
businesses of Red Brick and its subsidiaries at the Effective Time.
In addition, notwithstanding the above, Red Brick shall not, nor shall Red
Brick permit any subsidiary to, do any of the following without the prior
consent of Informix:
(a) Waive any stock repurchase rights, accelerate, amend or change the
period of exercisability of options or restricted stock, or reprice options
granted under any employee, consultant, director or other stock plans or
authorize cash payments in exchange for any options granted under any of such
plans;
(b) Grant any severance or termination pay to any officer or employee except
pursuant to written agreements outstanding, or policies existing, on the date of
the Merger Agreement and as previously disclosed in writing or made available to
Informix, or adopt any new severance plan;
(c) Transfer or license to any person or entity or otherwise extend, amend
or modify in any material respect any rights to Red Brick's intellectual
property, or enter into grants to transfer or license to any person future
patent rights, other than non-exclusive licenses in the ordinary course of
business and consistent with past practice;
(d) Declare, set aside or pay any dividends on or make any other
distributions (whether in cash, stock, equity securities or property) in respect
of any capital stock or split, combine or reclassify any capital stock or issue
or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or
in substitution for any capital stock;
(e) Purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any
shares of capital stock of Red Brick or its subsidiaries, except repurchases of
unvested shares at cost in connection with the termination of the service
relationship with any employee or consultant pursuant to stock option or
purchase agreements in effect on the date hereof;
(f) Issue, deliver, sell, authorize, pledge or otherwise encumber or propose
any of the foregoing of, any shares of capital stock or any securities
convertible into shares of capital stock, or subscriptions, rights, warrants or
options to acquire any shares of capital stock or any securities convertible
into shares of capital stock, or enter into other agreements or commitments of
any character obligating it to issue any such shares or convertible securities,
other than (i) the issuance delivery and/or sale of (A) shares of Red Brick
common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options or warrants therefor
outstanding as of the date of the Merger Agreement, and (B) shares of Red Brick
common stock issuable to participants in the ESPP consistent with the terms
thereof and (ii) the granting of stock options (and the issuance of common stock
54
<PAGE>
upon exercise thereof), in the ordinary course and consistent with past
practices, in an amount not to exceed options to purchase (and the issuance of
common stock upon exercise thereof) 60,000 shares in the aggregate;
(g) Cause, permit or propose any amendments to its Certificate of
Incorporation, Bylaws or other charter documents (or similar governing
instruments of any of its subsidiaries);
(h) Acquire or agree to acquire by merging or consolidating with, or by
purchasing any equity interest in or a portion of the assets of, or by any other
manner, any business or any corporation, partnership, association or other
business organization or division thereof, or otherwise acquire or agree to
acquire any assets which are material, individually or in the aggregate, to the
business of Red Brick or enter into any material joint ventures, strategic
partnerships or alliances;
(i) Sell, lease, license, encumber or otherwise dispose of any properties or
assets which are material, individually or in the aggregate, to the business of
Red Brick except sales or licenses of product or inventory in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice;
(j) Incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantee any such
indebtedness of another person, issue or sell any debt securities or options,
warrants, calls or other rights to acquire any debt securities of Red Brick,
enter into any "keep well" or other agreement to maintain any financial
statement condition or enter into any arrangement having the economic effect of
any of the foregoing other than (i) in connection with the financing of ordinary
course trade payables consistent with past practice or (ii) pursuant to existing
credit facilities in the ordinary course of business;
(k) Adopt or amend any employee benefit plan or employee stock purchase or
employee stock option plan, or enter into any employment contract or collective
bargaining agreement (other than offer letters and letter agreements entered
into in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice with
employees who are terminable "at will"), pay any special bonus or special
remuneration to any director or employee, or increase the salaries or wage rates
or fringe benefits (including rights to severance or indemnification) of its
directors, officers, employees or consultants other than in the ordinary course
of business, consistent with past practice, or change in any material respect
any management policies or procedures;
(l) Make any individual or series of related payments outside of the
ordinary course of business in excess of $100,000, other than banking,
accounting, legal and printing fees associated with the Merger;
(m) Except in the ordinary course of business, modify, amend or terminate
any material contract or agreement to which Red Brick or any subsidiary thereof
is a party or waive, release or assign any material rights or claims thereunder;
(n) Enter into any contracts, agreements, or obligations relating to the
distribution, sale, license or marketing by third parties of Red Brick's
products or products licensed by Red Brick other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, but in no event shall Red Brick enter
into any exclusive distribution arrangement;
(o) Materially revalue any of its assets or, except as required by generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), make any change in its accounting
methods, principles or practices;
(p) Engage in any action that could reasonably be expected to cause the
Merger to fail to qualify as a "reorganization" under Section 368(a) of the
Code;
(q) Engage in any action with the intent to directly or indirectly adversely
impact any of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; or
(r) Agree in writing or otherwise to take any of the actions described in
(a) through (q) above.
55
<PAGE>
Further, during the period from the date of the Merger Agreement and
continuing until the earlier of the termination of the Merger Agreement pursuant
to its terms or the Effective Time, Informix shall not do the following without
the prior consent of Red Brick:
(a) Declare, set aside or pay any dividends on or make any other
distributions (whether in cash, stock, equity securities or property) in respect
of any capital stock or split, combine or reclassify any capital stock or issue
or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or
in substitution for any capital stock; or
(b) Engage in any action that could reasonably be expected to cause the
Merger to fail to qualify as a "reorganization" under Section 368(a) of the
Code.
NO SOLICITATION
Subject to the provisions of the Merger Agreement summarized in the
following paragraph, from and after the date of the Merger Agreement until the
earlier of the Effective Time or the termination of the Merger Agreement
pursuant to its terms, Red Brick and its subsidiaries will not, nor will they
authorize or permit any of their respective officers, directors, affiliates or
employees or any investment banker, attorney, or other advisor or representative
retained by any of them to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate,
encourage or induce the making, submission or announcement of any Acquisition
Proposal (as hereinafter defined); (ii) participate in any discussions or
negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person any nonpublic information with
respect to, or take any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making
of any proposal that constitutes or may reasonably be expected to lead to, any
Acquisition Proposal, except as noted below; (iii) engage in discussions with
any person with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, except as to the existence
of these provisions or as noted below; (iv) approve, endorse or recommend any
Acquisition Proposal, except as noted below; or (v) enter into any letter of
intent or similar document or any contract agreement or commitment contemplating
or otherwise relating to any Acquisition Transaction (as hereinafter defined).
However, the Merger Agreement does not prohibit Red Brick from taking any of the
following actions: (x) furnishing nonpublic information regarding Red Brick and
its subsidiaries to, entering into a confidentiality agreement with or entering
into discussions or negotiations with, any person or group in response to a
Superior Offer (as hereinafter defined) submitted by such person or group (and
not withdrawn) if (A) neither Red Brick nor any representative of Red Brick or
any of its subsidiaries shall have violated any of the restrictions as described
above, (B) the Red Brick Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with
its outside legal counsel, that such action is required in order for the Red
Brick Board to comply with its fiduciary obligations to Red Brick's stockholders
under applicable law, (C) prior to furnishing any such nonpublic information to,
or entering into discussions or negotiations with, such person or group, Red
Brick gives Informix written notice of the identity of such person or group and
of Red Brick's intention to furnish nonpublic information to, or enter into
discussions or negotiations with, such person or group and Red Brick receives
from such person or group an executed confidentiality agreement containing
customary limitations on the use and disclosure of all nonpublic written and
oral information furnished to such person or group by or on behalf of Red Brick
and such limitations are at least as restrictive as the limitations set forth in
the confidentiality agreement between Red Brick and Informix, and (D)
contemporaneously with furnishing any such nonpublic information to such person
or group, Red Brick furnishes such nonpublic information to Informix (to the
extent such nonpublic information has not been previously furnished by Red Brick
to Informix); (y) complying with Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2 promulgated under the
Exchange Act with regard to an Acquisition Proposal; or (z) withholding,
withdrawing, amending or modifying its unanimous recommendation in favor of the
Merger, or endorsing or recommending to its stockholders a Superior Offer if (i)
a Superior Offer is made to Red Brick and is not withdrawn, (ii) neither Red
Brick nor any of its representatives shall have violated any of the restrictions
in the Merger Agreement with respect to solicitations for such Superior Offer or
to the party making such offer, and (iii) the Red Brick Board or any committee
thereof concludes in good faith, after consultation with its outside counsel,
that in light of such Superior Offer, the withholding, withdrawal, amendment or
modification of such recommendation, and the endorsement or recommendation of
such Superior Offer, is required in order for the Red Brick Board or any
committee thereof to comply with its
56
<PAGE>
fiduciary obligations under applicable law. Red Brick and its subsidiaries have
agreed to cease any and all existing activities, discussions, or negotiations
with any parties conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal.
In addition to the foregoing, Red Brick shall (i) provide Informix with at least
24 hours prior notice of any meeting of the Red Brick Board at which the Red
Brick Board is reasonably expected to consider a Superior Offer and (ii) provide
Informix with at least 2 business days or 48 hours prior written notice of a
meeting of the Red Brick Board at which the Red Brick Board is reasonably
expected to recommend a Superior Offer to its stockholders and, together with
such notice, a copy of the definitive documentation relating to such Superior
Offer to the extent available.
As used in the Merger Agreement and this Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
"Acquisition Proposal" means any offer or proposal (other than an offer or
proposal by Informix) relating to any Acquisition Transaction. As used in the
Merger Agreement and this Proxy Statement/Prospectus, "Acquisition Transaction"
means any transaction or series of related transactions other than the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement involving: (i) any acquisition
or purchase from Red Brick by any person or "group" (as defined under Section
13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder) of more than
a 15% interest in the total outstanding voting securities of Red Brick or any of
its subsidiaries, any tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would
result in any person or "group" (as defined under Section 13(d) of the Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder) beneficially owning 15% or more of
the total outstanding voting securities of Red Brick or any of its subsidiaries,
or any merger, consolidation, business combination or similar transaction
involving Red Brick pursuant to which the stockholders of Red Brick immediately
preceding such transaction hold less than 85% of the equity interests in the
surviving or resulting entity of such transaction; (ii) any sale, lease (other
than in the ordinary course of business), exchange, transfer, license (other
than in the ordinary course of business), acquisition or disposition of more
than 50% of the assets of Red Brick; or (iii) any liquidation or dissolution of
Red Brick. As used in the Merger Agreement and this Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
"Superior Offer" shall mean an unsolicited bona fide written offer made by a
third party to consummate any of the following transactions: (i) a merger,
consolidation, business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution
or similar transaction involving Red Brick pursuant to which the stockholders of
Red Brick immediately preceding such transaction hold less than 50% of the
equity interest in the surviving or resulting entity of such transaction; (ii) a
sale or other disposition by Red Brick of assets (excluding inventory and used
equipment sold in the ordinary course of business) representing in excess of 50%
of the fair market value of Red Brick's business immediately prior to such sale,
or (iii) the acquisition by any person or group (including by way of a tender
offer or an exchange offer or issuance by Red Brick), directly or indirectly, of
beneficial ownership or a right to acquire beneficial ownership of shares
representing in excess of 50% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares
of capital stock of Red Brick, on terms that the Red Brick Board determines, in
its reasonable judgment, after consultation with its financial advisor, to be
more favorable to Red Brick stockholders than the terms of the Merger; provided,
however, that any such offer shall not be deemed to be a Superior Offer if any
financing required to consummate the transaction contemplated by such offer is
not committed and is not likely in the judgment of the Red Brick Board to be
obtained by such third party on a timely basis.
In addition to the obligations of Red Brick as described above, Red Brick,
as promptly as practicable, will advise Informix orally and in writing of any
request for nonpublic information which Red Brick reasonably believes could lead
to an Acquisition Proposal or of any Acquisition Proposal, or any inquiry with
respect to or which Red Brick reasonably should believe would lead to any
Acquisition Proposal; the material terms and conditions of such request,
Acquisition Proposal or inquiry; and the identity of the person or group making
any such request, Acquisition Proposal or inquiry. Red Brick will keep Informix
informed in all material respects of the status and details (including material
amendments or proposed amendments) of any such request, Acquisition Proposal or
inquiry.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
The respective obligations of each party to the Merger Agreement to effect
the Merger are subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the Closing of the
following conditions: (i) the Merger Agreement and the
57
<PAGE>
Merger and other transactions contemplated thereby shall have been approved and
adopted by Red Brick's stockholders by the requisite vote under applicable law
and Red Brick's Certificate of Incorporation; (ii) the Commission shall have
declared the Registration Statement effective and no stop order suspending the
effectiveness of the Registration Statement, of which this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus is a part, or any part thereof shall have been issued and
no proceeding for that purpose, and no similar proceeding in respect of the
Proxy Statement/Prospectus, shall have been initiated or threatened in writing
by the Commission; (iii) no governmental entity shall have enacted, issued,
promulgated, enforced or entered any statute, rule, regulation, executive order,
decree, injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent)
which is in effect and which has the effect of making the Merger illegal or
otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Merger and all waiting periods under
the HSR Act (as defined under the section "Other Related Matters") relating to
the Merger will have expired or terminated early and all material foreign
antitrust approvals required to be obtained prior to the Merger in connection
with the transactions contemplated hereby shall have been obtained; (iv)
Informix and Red Brick shall each have received written opinions from legal
counsel to the effect that the Merger will constitute a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code; and (v) the Informix common stock
issuable to Red Brick stockholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and such
other shares required to be reserved for issuance in connection with the Merger
have been authorized for listing on the Nasdaq National Market upon official
notice of issuance.
In addition, the obligation of Red Brick to consummate and effect the Merger
shall be subject to the satisfaction on or prior to the Closing of each of the
following conditions, any of which may be waived, in writing, exclusively by Red
Brick: (i) each representation and warranty of Informix and Merger Sub contained
in the Merger Agreement (A) shall have been true and correct as of the date of
the Merger Agreement and (B) shall be true and correct on and as of the Closing
with the same force and effect as if made on the Closing, except for changes
contemplated by the Merger Agreement and for those representations and
warranties which address matters only as of a particular date (which
representations shall have been true and correct as of such particular date),
and except, with regard to the foregoing clauses (A) and (B), in such cases
where the failure to be so true and correct would not have a Material Adverse
Effect (as hereinafter defined) on Informix (it being understood that, for
purposes of determining the accuracy of such representations and warranties, all
"Material Adverse Effect" qualifications and other qualifications based on the
word "material" or similar phrases contained in such representations and
warranties shall be disregarded and any update of or modification to the
Informix disclosure letter to Red Brick made or purported to have been made
after the date of the Merger Agreement shall be disregarded) and Red Brick shall
have received a certificate with respect to the foregoing signed on behalf of
Informix by an authorized agent of Informix; (ii) Informix and Merger Sub shall
have performed or complied in all material respects with all agreements and
covenants required by the Merger Agreement to be performed or complied with by
them on or prior to the Closing and Red Brick shall have received a certificate
to such effect signed on behalf of Informix by an authorized officer of
Informix; and (iii) no Material Adverse Effect with respect to Informix shall
have occurred since the date of the Merger Agreement. As used in the Merger
Agreement and this Proxy Statement/Prospectus, "Material Adverse Effect" when
used in connection with an entity means any change, event, violation,
inaccuracy, circumstance or effect that is materially adverse to the business,
assets (including intangible assets), capitalization, financial condition or
results of operations of such entity and its parent (if applicable) or
subsidiaries taken as a whole; provided, however, that the following shall not
be considered a "Material Adverse Effect": (i) changes, events, violations,
inaccuracies, circumstances and effects that are caused by conditions affecting
the United States economy as a whole or affecting the industry in which such
entity competes as a whole, which conditions do not affect such entity in a
disproportionate manner, (ii) a shortfall in revenues of such entity as a result
of delays in customer orders (including any effects on such entity's operating
income which result directly from such revenue shortfall), which delays result
from the announcement and pendency of the Merger, or (iii) the loss of employees
resulting from the announcement and pendency of the Merger.
58
<PAGE>
Further, the obligations of Informix and Merger Sub to consummate and effect
the Merger shall be subject to the satisfaction on or prior to the Closing of
each of the following conditions, any of which may be waived, in writing,
exclusively by Informix: (i) each representation and warranty of Red Brick
contained in the Merger Agreement (A) shall have been true and correct as of the
date of the Merger Agreement and (B) shall be true and correct on and as of the
Closing with the same force and effect as if made on and as of the Closing,
except for changes contemplated by the Merger Agreement and for those
representations and warranties which address matters only as of a particular
date (which representations shall have been true and correct as of such
particular date) and except, with regard to the foregoing clauses (A) and (B)
and, in such cases (other than with respect to certain enumerated
representations and warranties) where the failure to be so true and correct
would not have a Material Adverse Effect on Red Brick as of such particular date
(it being understood that, for purposes of determining the accuracy of such
representations and warranties, all "Material Adverse Effect" qualifications and
other qualifications based on the word "material" or similar phrases contained
in such representations and warranties shall be disregarded and any update of or
modification to the Red Brick disclosure letter to Informix made or purported to
have been made after the date of the Merger Agreement shall be disregarded) and
Informix shall have received a certificate with respect to the foregoing signed
on behalf of Red Brick by an authorized agent of Red Brick; (ii) Red Brick shall
have performed or complied in all material respects with all agreements and
covenants required by the Merger Agreement to be performed or complied with by
it at or prior to the Closing and Informix shall have received a certificate to
such effect signed on behalf of Red Brick by an authorized officer of Red Brick;
(iii) no Material Adverse Effect with respect to Red Brick and its subsidiaries
shall have occurred since the date of the Merger Agreement; (iv) each Red Brick
Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) shall have entered into the Affiliate
Agreement in the form attached to the Merger Agreement as Exhibit C and each of
such agreements will be in full force and effect as of the Effective Time; (v)
all actions necessary to extinguish and cancel all outstanding Rights (as
defined in that certain Rights Agreement (the "Red Brick Rights Plan") dated as
of July 21, 1997, between Red Brick and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Rights
Agent, as amended) or render such Rights inapplicable to the Merger shall have
been taken; and (vi) on or before November 30, 1998, (A) the quarterly audit and
the nine-month audit specified in the Merger Agreement shall have been completed
by Ernst & Young LLP and the results of such audits shall have been communicated
to Informix, (B) the revenues and other financial results of the quarterly audit
for each of the three calendar quarters included in such audit shall not be
materially different from the revenues and other financial results disclosed by
Red Brick for each of such three calendar quarters in the Form 10-Q filed by Red
Brick with respect to each such quarter, (C) if requested, Ernst & Young LLP
shall have provided its consent, and (D) no material restatement or adjustment
shall have occurred or been made to any audited financial statements of Red
Brick on or before the date of the Merger Agreement which financial statements
were contained in any reports, schedules, registration statements or definitive
proxy statements filed by Red Brick since January 1, 1996.
TERMINATION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective
Time, whether before or after the requisite approval of the stockholders of Red
Brick, (i) by mutual written consent duly authorized by the Informix Board and
Red Brick Board; (ii) by either Red Brick or Informix if the Merger shall not
have been consummated by April 30, 1999 for any reason; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that
the right to terminate the Merger Agreement or the failure of the Merger to
occur prior to such date shall not be available to any party whose action or
failure to act has been a principal cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the
Merger to occur on or before such date and such action or failure to act
constitutes a breach of the Merger Agreement; (iii) by either Red Brick or
Informix if a governmental entity shall have issued an order, decree or ruling
or taken any other action in any case having the effect of permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger, which order, decree
or ruling is final and nonappealable; (iv) by either Red Brick or Informix if
the required approvals of the stockholders of Red Brick contemplated by the
Merger Agreement shall not have been obtained by reason of the failure to obtain
the required vote at the
59
<PAGE>
Red Brick Special Meeting duly convened therefor or at any adjournment thereof
(provided that the right to terminate the Merger Agreement for failure to obtain
Red Brick stockholder approval shall not be available to Red Brick where the
failure to obtain approval of Red Brick's stockholders shall have been caused by
the action or failure to act of Red Brick in breach of the Merger Agreement);
(v) by Informix, if (A) Red Brick shall not have used commercially reasonable
efforts to hold the Red Brick Special Meeting as promptly as practicable and in
any event within 45 days after the Registration Statement is declared effective
under the Securities Act, (B) the Red Brick Board shall have withheld, withdrawn
or modified in a manner adverse to Informix its recommendation in favor of
adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement or the Merger, (C) Red Brick shall
have failed to include in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus the unanimous
recommendation of the Red Brick Board in favor of the Merger and the Merger
Agreement, (D) the Red Brick Board shall have failed to reconfirm such
recommendation within seven business days after a written request to do so at
any time following the announcement or disclosure of an Acquisition Proposal,
(E) the Red Brick Board shall have accepted any Acquisition Proposal or
recommended any Acquisition Proposal to the stockholders of Red Brick, (F) Red
Brick shall have entered into any letter of intent or similar document or any
agreement, contract or commitment accepting any Acquisition Proposal, or a
tender or exchange offer relating to securities of Red Brick shall have been
commenced by a person or entity unaffiliated with Informix and Red Brick shall
not have sent to its security holders pursuant to Rule 14e-2 promulgated under
the Securities Act, within ten business days after such tender or exchange offer
is first published sent or given, a statement disclosing that Red Brick
recommends rejection of such tender or exchange offer; (vi) by Red Brick, upon a
breach of any representation, warranty, covenant, or agreement on the part of
Informix set forth in the Merger Agreement, or if any representation or warranty
of Informix shall have become untrue, provided, that if such inaccuracy in
Informix's representations and warranties or breach by Informix is curable by
Informix through the exercise of its commercially reasonable efforts, then Red
Brick may not terminate the Merger Agreement under this section for 30 days
after notice from Red Brick of such breach, provided that Informix continues to
exercise such commercially reasonable efforts to cure such breach; and (vii) by
Informix, upon a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement
on the part of Red Brick set forth in the Merger Agreement, or if any
representation or warranty of Red Brick shall have become untrue, provided, that
if such inaccuracy in Red Brick's representations and warranties or breach by
Red Brick is curable by Red Brick through the exercise of its commercially
reasonable efforts, then Informix may not terminate the Merger Agreement under
this section for 30 days after notice from Informix of such breach, provided
that Red Brick continues to exercise such commercially reasonable efforts to
cure such breach.
FEES AND EXPENSES
All fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such
expenses whether or not the Merger is consummated; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that
Informix and Red Brick shall share equally all fees and expenses, other than
attorneys' and accountants fees and expenses, incurred in relation to the
printing and filing of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (including any preliminary
materials related thereto) and the Registration Statement (including financial
statements and exhibits), and any amendments or supplements thereto.
RELATED AGREEMENTS
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, and as a condition
and inducement to enter into the Merger Agreement, Red Brick and Informix
entered into a stock option agreement dated October 7, 1998 (the "Stock Option
Agreement") whereby Red Brick agreed to grant to Informix an irrevocable option
(the "Informix Stock Option") to acquire up to a number of shares of the Red
Brick common stock, $0.0001 par value, including the associated rights to
purchase shares of Red Brick preferred
60
<PAGE>
stock pursuant to the Red Brick Rights Plan, equal to 19.9% of the issued and
outstanding shares of capital stock of Red Brick as of the first date, if any,
upon which an Exercise Event (as hereinafter defined) shall occur, in exchange
for $2.40 per share.
For all purposes of the Stock Option Agreement, an "Exercise Event" shall
have occurred (i) immediately prior to the earlier of (x) the consummation of,
or (y) any record date for a meeting of Red Brick's stockholders with regard to
an Acquisition Proposal for, an Acquisition Transaction with respect to Red
Brick with any party other than Informix (or an affiliate of Informix), (ii)
immediately prior to the effectiveness of a Change of Control (as hereinafter
defined) of the Red Brick Board as a result of an election contest within the
meaning of Rule 14a-11 of the Exchange Act; or (iii) upon termination of the
Merger Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(b), (e) or (f). As used herein, "Change
of Control" means a change in the composition of the Red Brick Board as a result
of which fewer than a majority of the incumbent directors are directors who
either (A) had been directors of Red Brick at least 18 months prior to such
change or (B) were elected or nominated for election to the Red Brick Board with
the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the directors who had been
directors of Red Brick at least 18 months prior to such change and who were
still serving as directors at the time of the election or nomination.
The Informix Stock Option shall terminate upon the earliest of (i) the
Effective Time, or (ii) 12 months following the termination of the Merger
Agreement; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that if the Informix Stock Option is exercisable
but cannot be exercised by reason of any applicable government order or because
the waiting period related to the issuance of the Informix Stock Option shares
under the HSR Act shall not have expired or been terminated, or because any
other condition to closing has not been satisfied, then the Informix Stock
Option shall not terminate until the tenth business day after such impediment to
exercise shall have been removed or shall have become final and not subject to
appeal.
VOTING AGREEMENTS
As an inducement to Informix to enter into the Merger Agreement, each
stockholder of Red Brick who is a party to a Voting Agreement, dated as of
October 7, 1998 (each a "Voting Agreement," and collectively, the "Voting
Agreements"), among the parties thereto (each a "Voting Agreement Stockholder,"
and collectively, the "Voting Agreement Stockholders") with Informix, has, by
executing a Voting Agreement, irrevocably appointed Informix (or any nominee of
Informix) as his, hers or its lawful attorney and proxy. Such proxies give
Informix the limited right to vote the shares of Red Brick common stock
beneficially owned by the Voting Agreement Stockholders (including any shares of
Red Brick common stock that such stockholders acquire after the time they
entered into the Voting Agreements) (collectively, the "Voting Shares") for the
approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement.
In exercising its right to vote the Voting Shares as lawful attorney and
proxy of the Voting Agreement Stockholders, Informix (or any nominee of
Informix) will be limited, at every Red Brick stockholders meeting and every
written consent in lieu of such meeting, to vote the Voting Shares (i) in favor
of approval of the Merger and the Merger Agreement and (ii) against approval of
any proposal made in opposition to or in competition with the consummation of
the Merger and against any merger, consolidation, sale of assets, reorganization
or recapitalization with any party other than Informix and any liquidation or
winding up of Red Brick. The Voting Agreement Stockholders may vote the Voting
Shares themselves on all other matters. The Voting Agreements terminate upon the
earlier to occur of (i) such date and time as the Merger shall become effective
in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement or (ii) such
date as the Merger Agreement shall be terminated in accordance with its terms.
Each Voting Agreement Stockholder has agreed not to transfer his or her Shares
prior to the expiration date of their Voting Agreement.
61
<PAGE>
AFFILIATE AGREEMENTS
In connection with the Merger, each member of the Red Brick Board, certain
officers of Red Brick and certain stockholders of Red Brick (in the reasonable
judgement of Red Brick, "affiliates" of Red Brick within the meaning of Rule 145
promulgated under the Securities Act (each a "Red Brick Affiliate")) has
executed the Red Brick Affiliate Agreement that will be effective as of the
Effective Time. Accordingly, Informix will be entitled to place appropriate
legends on the certificates evidencing any Informix common stock to be received
by a Red Brick Affiliate pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, and to
issue appropriate stop transfer instructions to the transfer agent for the
Informix common stock, consistent with the terms of the Red Brick Affiliate
Agreement. Pursuant to such agreements, such directors, officers and
stockholders will have also acknowledged the resale restrictions imposed by Rule
145 under the Securities Act on shares of Red Brick common stock to be received
by them in the Merger.
NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENTS
In connection with the Merger, Christopher Erickson and Phillip Fernandez of
Red Brick have entered into Noncompetition Agreements in favor of Informix. The
Noncompetition Agreements provide that, commencing at the Effective Time and
ending on the date that is 12 months from the Effective Time, such employee
shall not (i) be or become an officer, director, stockholder, owner, affiliate,
salesperson, co-owner, partner, trustee, promoter, technician, engineer,
analyst, employee, agent, representative, supplier, consultant, advisor or
manager of or to, or otherwise acquire or hold any interest in, any person or
entity that competes in the market for data warehousing software applications
(including, without limitation, related client/server relational database
management applications) for or on behalf of Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, Sybase,
NCR/Teradata, Broadbase, Platinum Software, Information Advantage,
Arbor/Hyperion or Microstrategy; or (ii) provide any service (as an employee,
consultant or otherwise), support, product or technology to any person or
entity, if such service, support, product or technology involves or relates to
software development in the market for data warehousing software applications
(including, without limitation, related client/server relational database
management applications) for or on behalf of Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, Sybase,
NCR/Teradata, Broadbase, Platinum Software, Information Advantage,
Arbor/Hyperion or Microstrategy.
In addition, Red Brick will encourage Ron Barale, Peggy DeLeon, Lawrence
Howard, Andrew Priest, Paul Rodwick and Kristi Smith to enter into similar
Noncompetition Agreements.
62
<PAGE>
OTHER RELATED MATTERS
GOVERNMENTAL AND REGULATORY APPROVALS
Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended
(the "HSR Act"), and the rules promulgated thereunder, the Merger may not be
consummated until notifications have been given and certain information has been
furnished to the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the
United States Department of Justice and the specified waiting period has been
satisfied. Each of Informix and Red Brick submitted its Notification and Report
Form under the HSR Act on October 26, 1998. The specified waiting period will
expire on November 25, 1998. The Merger is also subject to satisfaction of the
requirements of federal securities laws and applicable securities and "blue sky"
laws of the various states.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
The Merger will be treated as a purchase for accounting and financial
reporting purposes.
NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET QUOTATION
It is a condition to the Merger that (i) the shares of Informix common stock
to be issued in connection with the Merger and (ii) the shares of Informix
common stock to be reserved for issuance in connection with the assumption of
outstanding Red Brick Stock Options be approved for quotation on The Nasdaq
National Market. A notice of listing will be filed for listing such shares of
Informix common stock on The Nasdaq National Market.
RESTRICTIONS ON RESALE OF INFORMIX COMMON STOCK
The Informix common stock to be issued in the Merger will have been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act")
by a Registration Statement on Form S-4, thereby allowing those shares to be
traded without restriction by all former holders of Red Brick common stock who
(i) are not deemed to be "affiliates" of Red Brick at the time of the Red Brick
Special Meeting (as "affiliates" is defined for purposes of Rule 145 under the
Securities Act) and (ii) who do not become "affiliates" of Informix after the
Merger.
Shares of Informix common stock received by those stockholders of Red Brick
who are deemed to be affiliates of Red Brick may be resold without registration
under the Securities Act only as permitted by Rule 145 under the Securities Act
or as otherwise permitted under the Securities Act. The Merger Agreement
requires Red Brick to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its
affiliates to enter into agreements not to make any public sale of any Informix
common stock received upon consummation of the Merger, except in compliance with
Rule 145 under the Securities Act. See "The Merger Agreement--Related
Agreements--Affiliate Agreements." In general, Rule 145, as currently in effect,
imposes restrictions on the manner in which such affiliates may make resales of
Informix common stock that such affiliates, and others (including persons with
whom the affiliates act in concert), may sell within any three-month period.
These restrictions will generally apply for at least a period of one year after
the Merger (or longer if the person is an affiliate of Informix).
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus does not cover any resales of Informix
common stock received by persons who are deemed to be affiliates of Red Brick.
63
<PAGE>
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS OF INFORMIX AND RED BRICK
After consummation of the Merger, the holders of Red Brick common stock who
receive Informix common stock under the terms of the Merger Agreement will
become stockholders of Informix. As stockholders of Red Brick, their rights are
presently governed by Delaware law, by Red Brick's Certificate of Incorporation,
as amended (the "Red Brick Certificate"), and by Red Brick's Bylaws, as amended
(the "Red Brick Bylaws"). As stockholders of Informix, their rights will be
governed by Delaware law, by Informix's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended
(the "Informix Certificate"), and by Informix's Bylaws, as amended (the
"Informix Bylaws"). The following discussion summarizes the material differences
between the rights of holders of Red Brick common stock and holders of Informix
common stock and differences between the charters and bylaws of Red Brick and
Informix. This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the Red Brick Certificate and Red Brick Bylaws, the
Informix Certificate and Informix Bylaws, and the relevant provisions of
Delaware law.
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE STOCKHOLDERS
Under Delaware law, a special meeting of stockholders may be called by the
board of directors or by any other person authorized to do so in the certificate
of incorporation or the bylaws. The Red Brick Bylaws provide that special
meetings of the stockholders may be called by the President, or by the President
or Secretary at the request in writing of the majority of the members of the
Board of Directors. The Informix Bylaws provide that special meetings of the
stockholders may be called by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, by the
President, or pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the Board of
Directors.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
Both the Red Brick Bylaws and the Informix Bylaws provide that written
notice, stating the place, date (which shall be not less than ten nor more than
60 days before the date of the meeting) and hour of the special meeting and the
purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called, shall be given to each
stockholder entitled to vote at such special meeting.
ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT OF STOCKHOLDERS
Under Delaware law, unless the certificate of incorporation provides
otherwise, any action to be taken by stockholders may be taken without a
meeting, without prior notice, and without a vote, if the stockholders having
the number of votes that would be necessary to take such action at a meeting at
which all stockholders were present and voted consent to the action in writing.
Both the Red Brick Certificate and the Informix Certificate eliminate actions by
written consent of the stockholders.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR MEETINGS
The Red Brick Bylaws provide that notice of any proposal by a stockholder of
business to be transacted at any annual meeting of the stockholders, to be
timely, must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal place of
business of the corporation not less than 60 days prior to the first anniversary
of the prior year's annual meeting; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that if (i) the date of
the annual meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than
60 days after such anniversary date, or (ii) the stockholder proposal is for a
special meeting of the stockholders, then notice by the stockholder to be timely
must be so delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the
60th day prior to such annual or special meeting or the 10th day following the
day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The
Informix Bylaws provide that notice of any proposal by a stockholder of business
to be transacted at any meeting of the stockholders, to be timely, must be
delivered to or mailed and received at the principal place of business of the
corporation not less than 120 days prior to the meeting.
64
<PAGE>
CUMULATIVE VOTING
Neither the Red Brick Certificate and Bylaws nor the Informix Certificate
and Bylaws provide for cumulative voting in elections of directors. Without
cumulative voting, the holders of a majority of the shares present at any annual
meeting will be able to elect all of the directors to be elected at that
meeting, and no person could be elected without the support of a majority of the
stockholders. Thus, a person or persons holding shares or proxies representing
less than a majority of the shares present will not be able to elect any
directors as they might if cumulative voting were applicable.
NOMINATIONS FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ADVANCE NOTICE OF STOCKHOLDER
NOMINEES
The Red Brick Bylaws provide that nominations for election to the Board of
Directors must be made (i) pursuant to Red Brick's notice with respect to such
meeting, (ii) by direction of the Board of Directors or (iii) by any stockholder
of record of any outstanding class of capital stock of the corporation entitled
to vote for the election of directors who has complied with certain notice
provisions. Nominations, other than those made by the Board of Directors of Red
Brick must be preceded by notification in writing received by the Secretary of
the corporation not less than 60 days prior to the first anniversary of the
prior year's annual meeting; PROVIDED, HOWEVER,that if the date of the annual
meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 60 days
after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so
delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the 60th day
prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public
announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Only persons nominated
in accordance with the Red Brick Bylaws shall be eligible to serve as directors
of Red Brick. The Informix Bylaws provide that nominations of persons for
election to the Board of Directors of the corporation, other than those made by
or at the direction of the Board of Directors, shall be made pursuant to timely
notice in writing to the Secretary of Informix. To be timely, a stockholder's
notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive
officers of the corporation not less than 120 days prior to the meeting.
NUMBER OF DIRECTORS
The Red Brick Bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be fixed
from time to time by resolution of the Red Brick Board or by the stockholders at
an annual meeting of Red Brick. The number of authorized members of the Red
Brick board is currently fixed at four. The Informix Bylaws provide that the
number of directors shall be set at seven and divided into three classes with
the term of office of one class expiring each year.
REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS
The Red Brick Certificate and Red Brick Bylaws provide, consistent with
Delaware law, that any director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed,
with or without cause, by the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled
to vote at an election of directors. The Informix Bylaws provide for removal of
directors only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the
shares of the class of stock so entitled to vote.
EXCULPATION OF DIRECTORS
Each of Red Brick and Informix has included in its Certificate of
Incorporation a provision which eliminates the personal liability of its
directors from monetary damages resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty as a
director to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware Law.
INDEMNIFICATION
The Red Brick Bylaws provide for the indemnification of directors to the
maximum extent and in the manner permitted by the Delaware Law, and grant to the
Board discretionary power to indemnify any
65
<PAGE>
officer or employee of Red Brick. The Informix Bylaws provide for the
indemnification of a director, officer, employee or agent, provided that such
individual shall not be indemnified for willful misconduct or for conduct
finally adjudged to have been knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest.
AMENDMENT, REPEAL OF BYLAWS
The Red Brick Certificate and Red Brick Bylaws provide that the Red Brick
Bylaws can be amended or repealed either by the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the outstanding voting shares or by the Board of Directors. The
Informix Certificate provides that the Informix Bylaws can be amended or
repealed only upon the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding voting shares considered for this purpose as one class.
STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLANS
Each of Red Brick and Informix has adopted a stockholder rights plan that,
among other things, discourages certain types of transactions which may involve
an actual or threatened change of control of their respective companies. The
primary difference between the plans is the threshold percentage of stock
ownership sought or obtained by a potential acquiror which triggers the
exercisability of rights under such plans. The threshold percentage for Red
Brick is 15% of Red Brick's outstanding common stock. The threshold percentage
for Informix is 20% of Informix's outstanding common stock. Each of these plans
is summarized in the respective companies' description of their capital stock.
See "Description of Informix Capital Stock--Antitakeover Effects of Provisions
of Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws; Rights Agreement" and "Description
of Red Brick Capital Stock--Rights Agreement."
66
<PAGE>
BUSINESS OF INFORMIX
OVERVIEW
Informix is a leading multinational supplier of information management
software. Informix designs, develops, manufactures, markets and supports
relational database management systems ("RDBMS"), connectivity interfaces and
gateways and application development tools for graphical and character-based
software applications as part of an RDBMS. Database management software permits
multiple individual users, employing different application software, to access
and manage the same data concurrently without corrupting the underlying
database. RDBMS software extends the functionality and utility of non-relational
database management software by simplifying the data retrieval process for
end-users, who do not require specific knowledge about the structure of the
database but need only to specify the data to be retrieved. Companies commonly
employ RDBMS software for use in storing, managing and retrieving the large
amounts of data necessary to support internal management information and
decision-support systems as well as mission-critical data processing
applications.
Informix believes that technological advances, including the development and
commercialization of the Internet, will lead to increasingly sophisticated
customer requirements for data storage and management beyond the functionality
offered by conventional RDBMS products. In recent years, the types and
quantities of data required to be stored and managed has grown increasingly
complex and includes, in addition to conventional character data, audio, video,
text and three dimensional graphics. In 1996, Informix devoted substantial
resources in the development of object-relational database management systems
("ORDBMS") and tools for applications in multimedia and entertainment, digital
media publishing and financial services.
Informix markets its products to end-users on a worldwide basis directly
through its sales force and indirectly through application resellers, OEMs and
distributors. The principal geographic markets for Informix's products are North
America, Europe, the Asia/Pacific region, and Latin America. In recent years,
approximately half of Informix's total revenues have been generated outside
North America. Informix's principal customers include businesses ranging from
small corporations to Fortune 1000 companies, principally in the manufacturing,
financial services, telecommunications, media, retail/wholesale, hospitality and
government services sectors.
PRODUCTS
INFORMIX DYNAMIC SERVER
Informix Dynamic Server is a high performance, enterprise capable online
transaction processing database server. This product is based on Informix's
Dynamic Scalable Architecture and features parallel data processing capability,
replication and connectivity options built into its core. Informix Dynamic
Server is available in a variety of configurations based upon adding one or more
of the configuration options described below.
Informix also provides a version of Informix Dynamic Server called the
Workgroup Edition, which has been adapted specifically for workgroup
environments.
SERVER CONFIGURATION OPTIONS
Informix makes available five server configuration options, which are
integrated in various combinations along with Informix Dynamic Server to meet
specific customer requirements.
The Informix Advanced Decision Support Option extends Informix Dynamic
Server with a variety of decision support functions including summarization,
sampling, and "top-N."
67
<PAGE>
The Informix Extended Parallel Option adapts Informix Dynamic Server to work
within loosely coupled, share-nothing computing architectures, including
clusters of symmetric multiprocessing systems and parallel processing systems.
The Informix Universal Data Option extends Informix Dynamic Server with
support for extensibility and SQL3. Extensibility includes the ability to add
new objects and data types, business specific procedures and logic, and new
indexing search methods to the server, as well as support for DataBlade modules,
which can include a related set of data types, functions and indexes for a
specific purpose.
The Informix MetaCube ROLAP Option adds an on-line analytical processing
engine to Informix Dynamic Server that automatically preconsolidates data and
provides a multidimensional view of data without the constraints of two
dimensional (row and table) data model. This option also includes MetaCube
Explorer; MetaCube Scheduler for batch processing; MetaCube Queryback for
running queries in the background; MetaCube Aggregator for creating and
maintaining aggregates in a data warehouse; MetaCube for Excel which enables
data Warehouse analysis in an Excel spreadsheet environment; and MetaCube for
the Web which brings MetaCube analysis capabilities to intranets.
Finally, the Informix Web Integration Option provides connectivity between
Web servers and Informix Dynamic Server. This option enables developers to
create intelligent web applications based upon database information that deliver
multimedia, tailored Web pages to users.
DATABLADE MODULES
DataBlade modules combine new data types, new functions or methods, and new
indexing operations, which taken together extend Informix Dynamic Server. The
DataBlade modules are used in conjunction with the Universal Data Option.
Informix sells the following DataBlade modules, and others are available through
Informix's partners:
The Informix Video Foundation DataBlade module provides an open and scalable
software architecture that allows strategic third-party development partners to
incorporate specific video technologies such as video servers, external control
devices, compression codes or cataloging tools into database management
applications with the Informix Dynamic Server. In addition, the video data types
and data model allow customers to explore new ways to manipulate video and
associated metadata, or information about the video.
The Informix TimeSeries DataBlade module expands the functionality of the
database by adding support for the management of time-series and temporal data.
The TimeSeries DataBlade module supports a regular or irregular repeating
time-stamped series of any datatype supported by Informix Dynamic Server or any
structure or combination of these. For example, a set of open, high, low and
close currency values can be used to record a time-based series of stock prices.
The granularity of time recording can be adjusted to suit the unique
requirements of the application. The TimeSeries DataBlade module provides
support for three new datatypes, time-series, calendar and calendar pattern, and
over 80 functions to manage them. The time-series type stores sequences of
time-stamped information, and a related calendar allows access to specific
portions of the time series for update, analysis, display or other uses.
The Informix Geodetic DataBlade module provides geo-spatial datatypes and
functions supporting two-dimensional representation of the earth's surface based
on a geodetic (longitude, latitude and datum) coordinate system. In addition to
two-dimensional geographic feature support, the Geodetic DataBlade Module allows
an altitude range and a time range to be specified.
The Informix Unicode DataBlade module allows users to store, access and
manipulate native Unicode data in the same way as any variable character data is
manipulated.
68
<PAGE>
CONNECTIVITY AND GATEWAY PRODUCTS
Informix's principal connectivity products include the following:
Informix-Enterprise Gateway Manager is a connectivity tool allowing
applications running on various operating systems to access data sources via
loadable gateway drivers. Informix also offers gateway drivers for Oracle and
Sybase databases. Drivers for additional data sources are available from various
third parties.
Informix-Enterprise Gateway with DRDA is a UNIX based connectivity tool
allowing interoperability to IBM databases such as DB2, DB2/VM and DB2/400 from
Windows and UNIX clients. Informix-Gateway with DRDA allows applications built
with Informix application development tools to access and modify information in
Distributed Relational Database Architecture compliant database management
systems.
Informix-ESQL for C and COBOL are embedded SQL products which permit
developers to take advantage of SQL technology while building applications is in
C or COBOL.
Informix-CLI is a library of low level functions that provide high
performance direct access to Informix databases from applications built in C or
other third generation languages. Informix-CLI is compliant with Microsoft's
ODBC specifications.
Informix-Client SDK is a single packaging of several application programming
interfaces ("APIs") needed to develop applications for Informix servers. These
interfaces allow developers to write applications in the language in which they
are familiar, whether it be Java, C++, C, or ESQL.
Informix-Object Interface for C++ allows developers using C++ to work with
the Informix server product line through a single object-oriented application
programming interface (API). Informix-Object Interface C++ is for C++ developers
requiring an object-oriented interface to the server for the development of
SQL-based applications.
Informix-Connect is a runtime connectivity product which includes the
runtime libraries of the Informix APIs which comprise the Informix-Client SDK
product. These libraries are required by applications running on client machines
in order to access Informix servers, and it is needed when finished applications
are ready for deployment. Informix-Connect is the runtime component of Client
SDK.
Informix-JDBC Driver is a native Java driver that connects platform
independent client-side Java applications to any currently shipping and
supported Informix database.
Informix-DCE/NET is a DCE-based connectivity product that allows customers
to access Informix databases transparently through Microsoft's Open Database
Connectivity (ODBC) interface while having the features of security and naming
services.
Informix-Open is a set of libraries that allows Informix ODBC-compliant
applications to connect to and interface with an Informix, Oracle, or Sybase
server.
Informix-Enterprise Gateway for EDA/SQL allows tools and applications
running on UNIX and Microsoft Windows to access data located anywhere in an
enterprise. It provides both SQL and remote procedure call access to over 60
relational and nonrelational data sources on 35 different hardware platforms and
operating systems.
DATABASE TOOLS
Informix offers a variety of database application development tools designed
to allow users to build applications. Informix's principal database tools
include:
Informix Data Director for Visual Basic enables developers to prototype,
build, and extend workgroup and enterprise applications. Data Director for
Visual Basic reduces the amount of application code
69
<PAGE>
necessary for writing client/server solutions by automating the data access
operations for the client application. This automation eliminates the time
consuming task of writing data access code, allows developers to incorporate
sophisticated functionality without having to be SQL experts, and enables
project teams to improve their time to market with scalable applications. Data
Director enables developers to create applications that support user defined
data types, including images, Web pages and spatial data.
Informix-NewEra is a graphical, object-oriented development environment
designed for creating enterprise-wide multi-tier client/server database
applications. Informix-NewEra features a fourth generation object-oriented
programming language, reusable class libraries, application partitioning and
flexible application deployment and supports open connectivity to Informix and
non-Informix databases. Informix-NewEra is currently available for Microsoft
Windows and OSF Motif.
Informix-4GL is a character-based development environment, which includes a
fourth generation programming language with screen building, report entry, and
SQL database input/output capabilities. The Informix-4GL product family is
comprised of three core products: Informix-4GL Compiled, Informix-4GL Rapid
Development Systems and Informix-4GL interactive Debugger.
Informix-SQL is a package of five interactive tools for creating
character-based applications. Informix-SQL consists of a forms package, a report
writer, an interactive SQL editor, a menu building and an interactive schema
editor.
Informix-SE is a "load and go" database server with client/server
capabilities, and it is SQL compliant.
C-ISAM is Informix's indexed sequential access method library of C functions
for creating and using indexed sequential files.
SERVICES, CONSULTING AND CUSTOMER SUPPORT
Informix maintains field-based and centralized corporate technical staffs to
provide a comprehensive range of assistance to its customers. These services
include pre- and post-sales technical assistance, consulting, product and sales
training and technical support services. Consultants and trainers provide
services to customers to assist them in the use of Informix's products and the
design and development of applications that utilize Informix's products.
Informix provides post-sales support to its customers on an optional basis
for annual fees which generally range from 12% to 20% of the license fees paid
by the customer. These support services usually include product updates.
During fiscal 1996 and the first quarter of fiscal 1997, as part of its
sales and marketing strategy, Informix launched a series of "Information
Superstores." The Superstores were intended to demonstrate and offer Informix's
software products to customers on actual hardware platforms used by those
customers, thereby permitting the end-user to evaluate and monitor the
performance and functionality of Informix's products prior to purchase. In
addition, the Superstores offered application tools from leading third-party
tools and application vendors installed on a variety of platforms, including
Data General Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company, IBM, NCR/Teradata, Pyramid,
Sequent Computer Systems Inc. ("Sequent"), Silicon Graphics and Sun
Microsystems. In connection with Informix's restructuring announced in the
second quarter of 1997, Informix scaled back its original plans and repositioned
its remaining sites as solution labs managed by Informix's consulting practice.
The decision to scale back the Superstores resulted in a charge to operations
during fiscal 1997 of approximately $37.0 million. See "Informix Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--
Restructuring Charges."
70
<PAGE>
MARKETING AND CUSTOMERS
Informix distributes its products through the channels of direct end-user
licensing, OEMs, application vendors addressing specific markets and
distributors. Informix has chosen a multiple channel distribution strategy to
maintain broad market coverage and product availability. Informix, therefore,
has generally avoided exclusive relationships with its licensees and other
resellers of its products. Discount policies and reseller licensing programs are
intended to support each distribution channel with a minimum of channel
conflict. Informix also provides a financing option to customers in connection
with the license of software. For fiscal 1997, sales of licenses directly to end
users accounted for 58% of total license revenues and sales to OEM's and sales
through resellers accounted for 42% of total license revenues.
At September 30, 1998, Informix's sales, marketing and support staff totaled
1,013 regular employees in the North America region; 167 regular employees in
the Latin America region; 600 regular employees in Europe, the Middle East and
Africa; and 346 regular employees in the Asia/Pacific region.
LICENSING
END-USER LICENSING
Informix licenses its products to large companies and government entities
through its direct sales force, and to certain of these companies, as well as
smaller end-users, through its telemarketing sales force. Informix believes that
the common core technology of its database management system products, based on
standard operating systems and the SQL database language, helps it sell into
major corporations and government agencies that wish to standardize their
diverse computing environments. As a result, certain of these end-user
organizations have entered into general purchasing agreements with Informix
which offer volume discounts.
APPLICATION VENDOR LICENSING
Since its inception, Informix has licensed application vendors to distribute
its products. A typical application vendor develops an application product
(E.G., an insurance agency management system) using one of Informix's products
and then licenses the resultant application software to its customers in the
target market. The application vendor customer purchases a license for use of
Informix's product to develop an applications program. Depending on the
application program developed, it may include a run-only license, a full version
license or even multiple product licenses.
Application vendors develop applications using a wide array of application
development tools, including products from Informix, such as Informix-NewEra,
Informix-4GL and Informix-SQL, as well as products offered by third parties.
Applications developed using Informix's products are generally portable across
various brands of computers and different operating systems.
Informix has specialized programs to support the application vendor
distribution channel. Under these programs, Informix provides to selected
application vendors a combination of marketing development services, consulting
and technical marketing support and discounts.
OEM LICENSING
Informix's products are also marketed with the assistance of the sales
forces of its OEM customers who have concluded that "solution selling" of a
combination of software and hardware to their respective customers enhances the
sales of their computer equipment. Informix believes that the compatibility and
range of applications for its products are significant to this distribution
channel.
71
<PAGE>
DISTRIBUTOR LICENSING
Informix has established a network of full service international
distributors who provide local service and support, as well as Informix's
products, to their respective national markets. Distributors are used to
supplement Informix's direct sales force and enable Informix to sell its
products and services in countries where Informix has not established a direct
sales force.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
The computer software industry is highly competitive and rapidly changing.
Consequently, Informix dedicates considerable resources to research and
development efforts to enhance its existing product lines and to develop new
products to meet new market opportunities. Most of Informix's current software
products and accompanying documentation have been developed internally; however,
Informix has acquired certain software products from others and plans to do so
again in the future.
Major product releases resulting from research and development projects in
fiscal 1997 included the new releases of Informix Dynamic Server; Universal Data
Option; Extended Parallel Option; Advanced Decision Support Option; Informix
Dynamic Server, Workgroup Edition; and the initial release of Web Integration
Option.
Informix's current product development efforts are focused on (i) improving
and enhancing current products and new products, with particular emphasis on
parallel computer architecture, user-defined database extensions, Web technology
integration, graphical desk top and system administration; (ii) improving
Informix's products to provide greater speed and support for larger numbers of
concurrent users; and (iii) adapting new products to the broad range of computer
brands and operating systems Informix currently supports and adapting current
products to new brands of computers and operating systems which represent
attractive market opportunities for Informix's products.
There can be no assurance that Informix's product development efforts will
be successful or that any new products will achieve significant market
acceptance.
As of September 30, 1998, Informix had 988 regular employees engaged in
research and development. In recent months, Informix has experienced high
attrition in its product development group and has had difficulty attracting
qualified replacement development personnel. Any failure to attract and retain a
sufficient number of qualified development personnel would have a material
adverse effect on Informix's business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Informix's research and development expenditures for fiscal 1997, 1996 and
1995 was $139.3 million, $120.2 million and $85.6 million, respectively,
representing approximately 21%, 16% and 14% of net revenues for such periods. In
addition, during fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, Informix capitalized product
development costs of $21.8 million, $28.4 million and $17.5 million,
respectively, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
86. See "Informix Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations."
The market for Informix's products and services is characterized by rapidly
changing technology, changing customer needs, frequent new product introductions
and evolving industry standards that may render existing products and services
obsolete. The life cycles of Informix's products are difficult to estimate.
Informix's growth and future financial performance will depend upon its ability
to enhance its existing products and to introduce new products on a timely and
cost-effective basis and that meet dynamic customer requirements. There can be
no assurance that Informix will be successful in developing new products or
enhancing its existing products or that such new or enhanced products will
receive market acceptance or be delivered timely to the market. Informix's
product development efforts are expected to continue to require substantial
investments by Informix, and there can be no assurance that Informix will have
sufficient resources to make the necessary investments. Informix has experienced
product development delays in the past and may experience delays in the future.
Delays in the scheduled availability or a
72
<PAGE>
lack of market acceptance of its products or failure to accurately anticipate
customer demand and meet customer performance requirements, including as a
result of recent attrition in Informix's product development group, could have a
material adverse effect on Informix's business, results of operations and
financial condition. In addition, products as complex as those offered by
Informix may contain undetected errors or bugs when first introduced or as new
versions are released. There can be no assurance that, despite testing, new
products or new versions of existing products will not contain undetected errors
or bugs that will delay the introduction or commercial acceptance of such
products. A key factor in determining the success of Informix will continue to
be the ability of Informix's products to operate and perform well with existing
and future leading, industry-standard application software products intended to
be used with RDBMS. Failure to meet existing or future interoperability
requirements of certain independent vendors and performance requirements of
certain independent vendors marketing such applications in a timely manner could
adversely affect the market for Informix's products. Commercial acceptance of
Informix's products and services could also be adversely affected by critical or
negative statements or reports by brokerage firms, industry and financial
analysts and industry periodicals concerning Informix, its products, business or
competitors or by the advertising or marketing efforts of competitors, or other
factors that could accept consumer perception.
In recent years, the types and quantities of data required to be stored and
managed has grown increasingly complex and includes, in addition to conventional
character data, audio, video, text, and three dimensional graphics. In 1996,
Informix devoted substantial resources in developing Informix's ORDBMS product
line. The market for the products offering object-relational database
functionality is new and evolving, and its growth depends upon a growing need to
store and manage complex data and on broader market acceptance of Informix's
products as a solution for this need. There can be no assurance that
organizations will chose to make the transition from conventional RDBMS to
ORDBMS. Delays in market acceptance of object-relational database management
products offered by Informix could have an adverse effect on Informix's results
of operations and financial condition.
COMPETITION
Competitors in the relational database software market compete primarily on
the basis of product price and performance characteristics, name recognition,
technical product support, product training and services. With respect to
product performance, Informix believes that the principal competitive factors
include (i) application development productivity (I.E., the speed with which
applications can be built); (ii) database performance (I.E., the speed at which
database storage and retrieval functions are executed); (iii) product function
and features; (iv) the ability to support large warehouses of information; (v)
reliability, availability and serviceability; (vi) the distribution of software
applications and data across networks of computers from multiple suppliers; and
increasingly (vii) the ability to manage complex data and solve more complex
business problems based on such data. Although Informix believes that it
currently competes favorably with respect to such factors, there can be no
assurance that Informix can maintain its competitive position against current
and potential competitors, especially those with greater financial, marketing,
service, support, technical and other resources. In addition, Informix believes
that it has effectively controlled its operating expenses and significantly
improved its financial condition.
Informix faces intense competition in the market for RDBMS software
products. The market for Informix's products is subject to rapid technological
change and frequent new product introductions and enhancements, and Informix's
competitors in the market include several large vendors that develop and market
databases, applications, development tools or decision support products.
Informix's principal competitors include Computer Associates International,
Inc., IBM, Microsoft, NCR/Teradata, Oracle and Sybase. Several of Informix's
competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other
resources than Informix. As a result, they may be able to respond more quickly
to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or to
devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than Informix. Any failure by Informix to compete successfully with
73
<PAGE>
its existing competitors or future competitors could have a material adverse
effect on Informix's business, results of operations and financial condition.
Several of Informix's competitors have announced the development of enhanced
versions of their principal database products that are intended to improve the
performance or expand the capabilities of their existing products. New or
enhanced products by existing competitors or new competitors could result in
greater price pressure on Informix's products. In addition, the industry
movement to new operating systems, like Windows NT, access through low-end
desktop computers and access to data through the Internet may cause downward
pressure on prices of database software and related products. The bundling of
software products for promotional purposes or as a long-term pricing strategy by
certain of Informix's competitors could also result in reductions in the price
Informix may charge for its products. If such downward pressure on prices were
to occur, Informix's operating margins would be adversely affected. Existing and
future competition or changes in Informix's product or service pricing structure
or product or service offerings could result in an immediate reduction in the
prices of Informix's products or services. If significant price reductions in
Informix's products or services were to occur and not be offset by increases in
sales volume, Informix's business, results of operation and financial condition
would be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that Informix will
continue to compete successfully with its existing competitors or will be able
to compete successfully with new competitors.
In addition, Informix's public announcement in August 1997 of the pending
restatement of its financial statements, delays in reporting operating results
for the second and third quarters of fiscal 1997 while the restatement was being
compiled, threatened de-listing of Informix's common stock from the Nasdaq
National Market as a result of Informix's failure to satisfy its public
reporting obligations, corporate actions to restructure operations and reduce
operating expenses and customer uncertainty regarding Informix's financial
condition have adversely affected Informix's ability to sell its products in
fiscal 1997. In addition, since the beginning of 1997, Informix and its
competitors in the RDBMS industry have experienced substantially slower growth
in the market for RDBMS products. The financial restatement has now been
completed, its results have been publicly disclosed, and Informix is current
with respect to its public reporting obligations. In addition, Informix believes
that it has effectively controlled its operating expenses and significantly
improved its financial condition. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that
uncertainties resulting from the restatement, including ongoing customer concern
about Informix's financial condition, will not continue to have a materially
adverse effect on Informix's competitive position and results of operations.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Informix's success depends on proprietary technology. To protect its
proprietary rights, Informix relies primarily on a combination of patent,
copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures,
contractual provisions contained in its license agreements and technical
measures. Informix seeks to protect its software, documentation and other
written materials under trade secret and copyright laws, which provide only
limited protection. Informix holds one United States patent and several pending
applications. There can be no assurance that any other patents covering
Informix's inventions will issue or that any patent, if issued, will provide
sufficiently broad protection or will prove enforceable in actions against
alleged infringers.
Informix's products are generally licensed to end-users on a "right-to-use"
basis pursuant to a license that restricts the use of the products for the
customer's internal business purposes. Informix also relies on "shrink wrap"
licenses, which include a notice informing the end-user that, by opening the
product packaging, the end-user agrees to be bound by Informix's license
agreement printed on the package. Despite such precautions, it may be possible
for unauthorized third parties to copy aspects of its current or future products
or to obtain and use information that Informix regards as proprietary. In
particular, Informix has licensed the source code of its products to certain
customers under certain circumstances and for restricted uses. Informix has also
entered source code escrow agreements with a number of its
74
<PAGE>
customers that generally require release of source code to the customer in the
event of Informix's bankruptcy, liquidation or otherwise ceasing to conduct
business. There can be no assurance that Informix's means of protecting its
proprietary rights will be adequate or that Informix's competitors will not
independently develop similar or superior technology. Policing unauthorized use
of Informix's software is difficult, and while Informix is unable to determine
the extent to which piracy of its software products exists, software piracy can
be expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect Informix's proprietary rights to the same extent as do
the laws of the United States, and "shrink-wrap" licenses may be wholly or
partially unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Litigation may
be necessary in the future to enforce Informix's intellectual property rights,
to protect Informix's trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of
the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial
costs and diversion of resources and management attention and could have a
material adverse effect on Informix's business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Informix is not aware that any of its software product offerings infringe
the proprietary rights of third parties. There can be no assurance, however,
that third parties will not claim infringement by Informix with respect to its
current or future products. Informix expects that software product developers
will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products
and competitors in Informix's industry segment grows and the functionality of
products in different industry segments overlaps. Any such claims, with or
without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause
product shipment delays or require Informix to enter into royalty or licensing
agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be
available on terms acceptable to Informix or at all, which could have a material
adverse effect on Informix's business, results of operations and financial
condition.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ACTIONS ARISING UNDER FEDERAL AND STATE SECURITIES LAWS
Beginning on or about April 16, 1997, over 20 complaints alleging violations
of the federal securities laws were filed against Informix, (in some cases)
Ernst & Young, Informix's former independent accountants and certain Named
Individual Defendants (listed below) in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California. Most of the complaints have been filed as
purported class actions by individuals who allege that they are individual
investors who purchased Informix's common stock during a purported class period;
the alleged class periods vary among the complaints. The complaints name some or
all of the following current and former officers and directors of Informix as
defendants: Phillip E. White, Howard H. Graham, David H. Stanley, Ronald M.
Alvarez, Karen Blasing, D. Kenneth Coulter, Ira H. Dorf, Stephen E. Hill, Myron
(Mike) Saranga, Steven R. Sommer, Michael R. Stonebraker and Edwin C. Winder
(the "Named Individual Defendants"). On August 20, 1997, the District Court
entered an order consolidating all of the separately-filed class actions pending
at that time, designating the action as IN RE INFORMIX CORPORATION SECURITIES
LITIGATION, and designating as "related cases" all cases brought under the
federal securities laws then pending and any that may be filed after that date.
A consolidated amended class action complaint was filed on April 6, 1998. As
required by the provisions of the Exchange Act, as amended by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Court has designated the lead
plaintiffs in the federal action and has appointed lead plaintiffs' counsel.
A related non-class action, TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF LOUISIANA AND
STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF FLORIDA V. INFORMIX CORPORATION ET AL., has
been consolidated with IN RE INFORMIX CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION for all
pre-trial purposes. The LOUISIANA and FLORIDA plaintiffs request a total of
$10.173 million in damages. An amended consolidated complaint was filed by the
LOUISIANA and FLORIDA plaintiffs on April 3, 1998.
On or about March 19, 1998, another complaint alleging securities and common
law fraud and misrepresentation causes of action was filed in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. This complaint,
captioned WILLIAMS V. INFORMIX CORPORATION, ET AL., alleges both individual and
75
<PAGE>
class claims on behalf of former securities holders of Illustra Information
Technologies, Inc. ("Illustra") who exchanged their Illustra securities for
securities of Informix in February 1996 in connection with Informix's February
1996 acquisition of Illustra pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization
(the "Illustra Agreement"). This matter has been consolidated with IN RE
INFORMIX CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. The WILLIAMS complaint, like the
previously-filed federal complaints, alleges that Informix and certain of its
former officers and/or directors, and its independent auditors, issued false or
misleading statements regarding Informix's reported financial results and
business prospects. This matter has been consolidated with IN RE INFORMIX;
however, on June 19, 1998 the Court granted in part and denied in part the
Williams plaintiffs' motion to sever their case. The Court's order requires
defendants to respond separately to the factual allegations and legal claims
raised by the WILLIAMS complaint which are not pleaded in the consolidated
complaint in IN RE INFORMIX and for the WILLIAMS plaintiffs, rather than lead
plaintiffs, to respond to any motion to dismiss made by defendants with respect
to such claims. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Williams complaint on
July 24, 1998.
The existing federal court complaints allege that Informix, the Named
Individual Defendants and Ernst & Young issued or caused to be issued false or
misleading statements in Informix's filings with the Commission, press releases,
statements to securities analysts and other public statements regarding its
financial results and business prospects. The alleged class period in the
amended consolidated complaints extends from February 8, 1995 through November
18, 1997. In particular, plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that defendants
overstated Informix's revenue and earnings during the time period by improperly
recognizing revenue from sales of software licenses. All of these actions allege
that the defendants' false and misleading statements violate section 10(b) of
the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaints further
allege that the Named Individual Defendants sold Informix's common stock while
in the possession of adverse material nonpublic information. The existing
complaints, in general, do not specify the amount of damages that plaintiffs
seek. The individual defendants moved to dismiss the claims against each of
them. The District Court recently granted some but not all of the motions to
dismiss filed by the individual defendants for failure to meet pleading
requirements. The Court's order allows plaintiffs to file an amended complaint
against the defendants who have been dismissed.
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated federal class action
complaint on July 9, 1998.
Three purported securities class actions containing allegations similar to
the federal actions were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of San Mateo between May 19, 1997 and August 25, 1997. Those actions,
captioned RILEY V INFORMIX CORPORATION ET AL., DAYANI V. INFORMIX CORPORATION ET
AL., AND GOLDSTEIN V. WHITE ET AL., contained factual allegations nearly
identical to the allegations set forth in the federal court complaints, but
allege state law claims. The Superior Court has consolidated these actions into
the DAYANI case, and has appointed lead plaintiffs' counsel. By stipulation,
plaintiffs filed a consolidated, amended complaint on December 23, 1997. The
state court consolidated, amended complaint names as defendants Informix, Ernst
& Young and the Named Individual Defendants. The claims in the consolidated
amended state complaint arise under California securities, fraud and unfair
business practices statutes.
The state court consolidated, amended complaint alleges that the defendants
made false statements and engaged in unfair trade practices, materially
overstating Informix's revenue. Plaintiffs allege that defendants recorded as
revenue approximately $300 million from software license sales which should not
have been recorded because INTER ALIA, revenue was recognized on sales to
resellers before end-users were identified; revenue was recognized in
circumstances where customers had rights of return or cancellation; and Informix
recognized revenue from barter transactions in which Informix allegedly
exchanged software licenses for products that had no value to Informix.
Plaintiffs further allege that while Informix's stock price was artificially
inflated due to the overstatement of revenue, the defendants used Informix's
stock to make corporate acquisitions, and the Named Individual Defendants sold
stock while in possession of material adverse nonpublic information. The alleged
class period in the state court consolidated, amended complaint is February 7,
1995 through November 18, 1997.
76
<PAGE>
Defendants filed demurrers to the state court consolidated, amended
complaint on February 13, 1998. Defendants base their demurrers to the
consolidated, amended complaint in this action on the grounds that certain of
the individual defendants made no actionable statements during the alleged class
period, Informix did not engage in any market activity during the alleged class
period, the plaintiffs did not actually rely upon any of the alleged false and
misleading statements, the California statutory unfair business practices claims
are inapplicable to securities transactions, and the consolidated, amended
complaint fails to plead the alleged fraud with sufficient particularity. On
June 30, 1998, the Court issued a ruling sustaining defendants' demurrers to all
causes of action except plaintiffs' statutory securities claim against Informix.
In addition, the Court ruled that plaintiffs will be permitted to amend their
allegations except for those claims relating to statutory unfair business
practices under Section 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code.
DERIVATIVE ACTIONS
Informix also was named as a nominal defendant in eight derivative actions,
purportedly brought on its behalf, filed in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of San Mateo. The cases have been consolidated under the
caption IN RE INFORMIX CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, and the Court has
appointed lead plaintiff's counsel in the consolidated actions. The
consolidated, amended complaint alleges that, based upon the facts alleged in
the federal and state securities class actions, defendants breached their
fiduciary duties to Informix, engaged in abuses of their control of Informix,
were unjustly enriched by their sales of Informix's common stock, engaged in
insider trading in violation of California law and published false financial
information in violation of California law. The consolidated, amended complaint
names as defendants Ernst & Young, the Named Individual Defendants and Albert F.
Knorp, Jr., James L. Koch, Thomas A. McDonnell and Cyril J. Yansouni,
non-management directors of Informix. The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages on
Informix's behalf from each of the defendants. On December 18, 1997, plaintiffs
served their first amended, consolidated derivative complaint.
Informix, on whose purported behalf the derivative action is asserted, and
the individual defendants and Ernst & Young, against whom the claims are
alleged, filed demurrers to the consolidated derivative complaint on February 6,
1998. Informix's demurrer in this action is based upon the fact that the
plaintiff did not make demand on Informix's board prior to filing the derivative
action as is required by governing Delaware law. In addition, Informix's current
and former officers and directors have brought demurrers to the consolidated,
amended complaint on the grounds that plaintiffs fail to plead their claims with
sufficient particularity and that certain of plaintiffs' California statutory
causes of action do not apply, by their terms, to officers and directors of a
Delaware corporation. On April 1, 1998, the Court sustained Informix's demurrer
based upon the plaintiffs' failure to make demand. The Court has given
plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. On June 30, 1998, the Court issued an
order sustaining defendants' demurrers. In addition, the Court ruled that
plaintiffs will be permitted to amend their allegations except for their claims
for abuse of control, their claims under Section 1507 of the California
Corporations Code and their claims relating to statutory unfair business
practices under Section 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code.
Defendants will not file an answer in this action unless the Court overrules any
subsequent demurrers. Further, the defendants will not be in a position to state
their factual defenses to claims stated by the plaintiffs' claims until the
plaintiffs serve their second consolidated amended complaint and the Court rules
upon any future demurrers. Because of the nature of derivative litigation, any
recovery in the action would inure to the benefit of Informix.
UTAH ACTION
On or about May 12, 1998, certain individual plaintiffs filed an action on
their own behalf in Utah state court against Informix asserting state statutory
securities fraud and common law fraud claims. The Complaint, captioned MOON ET
AL. V. INFORMIX SOFTWARE, INC., alleges factual claims similar to the federal
complaints. Plaintiffs in this action do not specify the amount of damages they
seek. Informix recently
77
<PAGE>
removed the action to the United States District Court in Utah. Informix has
filed a motion to transfer this action to the Northern District of California.
NEW YORK ACTION
On or about July 20, 1998, an individual plaintiff filed an action in
federal court in the Southern District of New York. The complaint captioned
BERMAN V. INFORMIX CORPORATION, alleges factual claims similar to the federal
complaints filed in Northern California. The complaint seeks an unspecified
amount of actual damages and $5 million in punitive damages. Informix has moved
to transfer this action to the Northern District of California.
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS AND LIABILITY INSURANCE
Pursuant to Delaware law, Informix's Certificate of Incorporation, its
Bylaws and the indemnification agreements between Informix and each of its
current and former officers and directors, Informix is obligated to indemnify
its current and former officers and directors for certain liabilities arising
from their employment with or service to Informix. These indemnification
obligations require Informix to indemnify its current and former officers and
directors for any suit or other proceeding, threatened or actual, whether civil,
criminal, administrative, investigative, appellate or any other type of
proceeding, that arises as a result of any act or omission in the indemnitee's
capacity as an officer or director of Informix to the fullest extent permitted
under Delaware or any other applicable law. The indemnification extends to any
and all expenses (including but not limited to attorneys' fees and costs, and
any other out-of-pocket expense) and/ or liabilities of any type (including but
not limited to judgments, fines, excise taxes or penalties under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), and amounts paid in settlement)
reasonably incurred in connection with the investigation, defense, settlement or
appeal of such proceedings. The obligation to provide indemnification does not
apply if the indemnitee is adjudicated to be liable for fraudulent or criminal
conduct.
Informix has purchased directors' and officers' liability insurance to
reimburse it for the costs incurred in connection with its indemnification
obligations described above. For the period from August 1996 to August 1997, the
period in which most of the claims against Informix and certain of its directors
and officers were asserted, Informix had in place three directors and officers
liability insurance policies (the "1996 and 1997 D&O Policies"), each providing
$5 million in coverage for an aggregate of $15 million. The primary policy and
first excess policy were issued by Lloyds of London. The second excess policy
was issued by Admiral Insurance Company. The insurance carriers have taken the
position that litigation filed after the policy periods of the 1996 and 1997 D&O
Policies but arising from the same facts and circumstances as claims filed
during the period from August 1996 to August 1997, "relates back" to the 1996
and 1997 D&O Policies. Thus, the issuance carriers assert that actions filed
after August 1997 do not implicate coverage under Informix's D&O insurance
policies for the period August 1997 to August 1998 (the "Current D&O Policies").
The Current D&O Policies provide aggregate coverage of $20 million, subject to
various exclusions, including claims relating to the restatement of Informix's
financial statements. The 1996 and 1997 D&O Policies provide that 100 percent of
the costs incurred in defending claims asserted jointly against Informix and its
current and former officers and directors are allocable to the individuals'
defense and, thus, are covered by the policy. However, the 1996 and 1997 D&O
Policies do not provide any separate coverage for Informix. Moreover, Informix
does not have separate insurance to cover the costs of its own defense or to
cover any liability for any claims asserted against it. Informix has not
currently set aside any financial reserves relating to any of the
above-referenced actions.
In June 1998, one of Informix's insurance carriers filed a complaint seeking
rescission of its insurance policies on the grounds that Informix made material
misrepresentations in its applications relating to the relevant policies. The
carrier has subsequently agreed to drop its claim for rescission.
78
<PAGE>
ILLUSTRA ESCROW
In January 1997, pursuant to the Illustra Agreement, Informix made a claim
to certain shares held in an escrow fund. In response, the Illustra stockholders
have claimed that Informix wrongfully caused these shares to be retained in
escrow, thereby harming the Illustra stockholders. The Illustra securities
holders filed a demand for arbitration with the private arbitration service
agreed upon by the parties to the Illustra Agreement. In October, 1998, Informix
and the Illustra shareholders resolved their dispute regarding the remaining
shares held in the escrow. Informix and the Illustra stockholders agreed to a
dismissal of the arbitration proceeding. Informix and the Illustra stockholders
further agreed that the Illustra stockholders' claim for damages for the decline
in the value of the escrow shares could be raised in the Federal court action
filed on behalf of former Illustra stockholders, which action was described
above.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION INVESTIGATION
In addition, in July 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a
formal order of investigation of Informix and certain unidentified individuals
associated with Informix with respect to non-specified accounting matters,
financial reports, other public disclosures and trading activity in Informix's
securities. Informix is cooperating with the investigation and is providing all
information subpoenaed by the Commission. Informix is in the process of
producing documents and a number of current and former officers have been
contacted to appear before the Commission.
SERIES B PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS
On June 9, 1998, Informix filed a Post-Effective Amendment to its
Registration Statement on Form S-1 pertaining to Informix's sale of its Series B
Preferred stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") reviewed the
Post-Effective Amendment and declared it effective on August 13, 1998. The
Series B Preferred stockholders have claimed that during August 1998 they were
prevented from selling shares of Series B Preferred stock until the SEC
completed its review of the Post-Effective Amendment and, as a result, Informix
had failed to comply with certain terms of a Registration Rights Agreement
between the Series B Preferred stockholders and Informix. Informix is currently
involved in discussions with the Series B Preferred stockholders and expects to
resolve this matter before the end of the current fiscal year. Informix will
account for any cost associated with the resolution of this matter as an
additional dividend to the Series B Preferred stockholders. Informix is unable
to estimate the amount, if any, of such dividend.
GENERAL
The pending federal and state securities actions are in the early stages of
discovery. Consequently, at this time it is not reasonably possible to estimate
the damages, or the range of damages, that Informix might incur in connection
with such actions. However, the uncertainty associated with substantial
unresolved litigation can be expected to have an adverse impact on Informix's
business. In particular, such litigation could impair Informix's relationships
with existing customers and its ability to obtain new customers. Defending such
litigation will likely result in a diversion of management's time and attention
away from business operations, which could have a material adverse effect on
Informix's results of operations. Such litigation may also have the effect of
discouraging potential acquirors from bidding for Informix or reducing the
consideration such acquirors would otherwise be willing to pay in connection
with an acquisition.
FACILITIES
Informix's headquarters and its principal marketing, finance, sales,
administration, customer service and research and development operations are
located in five buildings in a corporate office park in Menlo Park, California.
Informix currently leases approximately 214,000 square feet of space in these
buildings.
79
<PAGE>
The leases for spaces in two of the buildings expire in September 2001. The
leases for space in the remaining three of the buildings were recently renewed
for an additional five year term expiring in March 2003. In addition, Informix
leases space totaling approximately 33,000 square feet in two additional
buildings in close proximity. These leases expire in May 2003 and October 2000.
In addition, certain of Informix's research and development facilities, a
portion of its customer service organization, its principal domestic
manufacturing facility and its telemarketing organization are located in a
134,000 square foot facility in Lenexa, Kansas. The buildings are leased to
Informix under a lease expiring in April 2003, subject to renewal for up to two
additional five year terms. The Lenexa, Kansas facility was leased to Informix
by a partnership of which Informix held a 50% partnership interest. Informix
entered an agreement to sell its interest in 49.9% of the partnership to the
other partner. Such sale closed in the first quarter of fiscal 1998. Informix
also leases office space, principally for sales and support offices, in a number
of facilities in the United States, Canada and outside North America. Informix
believes that its current facilities are adequate to meet its needs through the
next twelve months.
Some of the research and development operations for Informix's tools
products and a portion of customer service and sales training are located in
Oakland, California. Informix leases approximately 130,000 square feet at this
site, and the lease expires in May 2003. Informix also leases 47,276 square feet
in Portland, Oregon, primarily for its research and development group. The lease
on approximately one-half of this space expires on October 31, 2003. The lease
on the remaining space expires in March 2000.
In December 1996, Informix announced plans to relocate its corporate
headquarters from the Menlo Park facilities to a new corporate campus in Santa
Clara, California. In January 1997, Informix entered into a two-year lease for
27 acres of undeveloped commercial real estate in Santa Clara, which was
intended to be used for construction of the new headquarters facility. Informix
also obtained an option to purchase the land for $61.5 million. In order to
secure performance of its obligations under the lease, Informix pledged $61.5
million in cash collateral to the lessor. In April 1997, Informix exercised its
option to purchase the land, and in December 1997 completed the sale of the real
estate for net proceeds of approximately $59.3 million. In addition, in November
1996, Informix had leased approximately 200,000 square feet of office space in
Santa Clara on property located adjacent to the 27 acre undeveloped parcel. In
December 1997, Informix assigned its rights under such lease agreement to an
unrelated third party, although Informix remains contingently liable for the
lease payments thereunder.
EMPLOYEES
As of September 30, 1998, Informix and its subsidiaries employed 3,664
regular employees worldwide, including 2,126 in sales, marketing and support,
988 in research and development, 77 in operations and 473 in administration and
finance. Of Informix's total employees at September 30, 1998, approximately
1,491 were located outside North America. None of Informix's employees located
in the United States are represented by a labor union. A small number of
employees located outside the United States are represented by labor unions, and
the degree and scope of representation varies from country to country. Informix
has not experienced any work stoppages either domestically or internationally.
Since the first quarter of fiscal 1997, Informix has experienced a
significant number of voluntary resignations and has taken selective actions to
reduce the number of employees in certain functional areas. Informix had 3,664
employees at September 30, 1998, compared to 4,632 at March 30, 1997. In fiscal
1997, Informix experienced high attrition rates in its product development and
sales groups and has had trouble attracting qualified replacement personnel. The
competition for employees in the software industry is intense, and Informix
expects that such competition will continue for the foreseeable future.
80
<PAGE>
INFORMIX MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THE FOLLOWING MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS RELATING TO FUTURE
EVENTS OR THE FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF INFORMIX, WHICH INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. INFORMIX'S ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE
ANTICIPATED IN THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF CERTAIN FACTORS,
INCLUDING THOSE SET FORTH UNDER "RISK FACTORS," "BUSINESS" AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS
PROSPECTUS.
As a result of the restatement of Informix's financial statements for the
first quarter of 1997 and the years 1996, 1995 and 1994 as updated in subsequent
filings made by Informix, certain information contained in this Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations related
to the fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994 has changed from that which appeared in
Informix's originally filed Form 10-K for such periods.
In addition, as a result of the restatement of Informix's financial
statements for the first quarter of 1998, certain information contained in this
item related to such period has changed from that which appeared in the
Company's originally filed Form 10-Q for that period.
Effective January 1, 1998, Informix elected to change from the 4-4-5 week
quarterly convention previously followed to a calendar quarter convention
effective January 1, 1998. The change resulted in an additional three days and
one day of operations for the nine-month period and the three-month period ended
September 30, 1998, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the
previous year. The impact on Informix's financial statements for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1998 was to increase license revenue by $17.4
million, or 7% percent. In addition, accounts receivable increased approximately
$17.4 million and accrued expenses increased approximately $2.7 million.
References to or comparisons between the same "period" in this Prospectus
refer to Informix's nine-month period of the relevant fiscal year.
OVERVIEW
Informix is a leading multinational supplier of information management
software. It derives license revenues principally from licensing its relational
database management systems ("RDBMS") software and derives service revenues from
providing technical product support and product updates and consulting and
training services to customers. Informix's products are sold directly to
end-users and IMs and indirectly through application resellers, original
equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") and distributors.
In the first quarter of fiscal 1997, Informix experienced a substantial
shortfall in license revenues compared to forecasts, resulting in a substantial
net loss for the quarter. The shortfall in revenue was due to slow growth in
demand for RDBMS products as well as Informix's inability to close a number of
sales transactions that management anticipated would close by quarter's end,
particularly in Europe.
As a result of the shortfall in license revenues for the first quarter of
fiscal 1997, Informix, in the second quarter and again in the third quarter of
1997, initiated an internal restructuring of its operations intended to reduce
operating expenses and improve Informix's financial condition. These
restructurings included selective reductions in headcount and leased facilities
and the downsizing, elimination or conversion into solution labs of Informix's
planned Information Superstores. Costs associated with the restructurings
totaled approximately $108.2 million and had a material adverse effect on
Informix's results of operations for fiscal 1997. In addition, in fiscal 1997
Informix issued the newly designated series of its Preferred Stock, the Series
A-1 Preferred Stock (the "Series A-1 Preferred") and the Series B Preferred
Stock (the "Series B Preferred"), in two financing transactions which resulted
in aggregate net proceeds of $87.6 million to Informix (excluding a $1.0 million
fee paid to a financial advisor of Informix in connection with the sale of the
Series B Preferred). In February 1998, Informix issued an additional 60,000
shares of Series A-1 Preferred (the "Series A-1 Warrant") which warrant was
issued in connection with the sale of
81
<PAGE>
the Series A-1 Preferred in August 1997. The partial exercise of the Series A-1
Warrant resulted in net proceeds of $14.1 million to Informix. At September 30,
1998 the Series A-1 Warrant remained exercisable for up to 80,000 shares of
Series A-1 Preferred at a purchase price of $250 per share. At September 30,
1998, 36,000 shares of Series B Preferred remained outstanding. Informix entered
into a senior secured credit facility agreement for up to $75.0 million, of
which Informix was eligible to borrow $50.3 million at September 30, 1998 based
on certain eligibility criteria. See "Risk Factors--Risks Relating to Informix--
Need for Additional Financing."
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR 1996, 1995 AND 1994 AND FIRST QUARTER
OF FISCAL 1997
In August 1997, Informix announced that it had become aware of errors and
irregularities that affected the timing and the dollar amount of reported earned
revenues from license transactions for all annual periods in the three years
ended December 31, 1996. These errors and irregularities included unauthorized
and undisclosed arrangements or agreements between Company personnel and
resellers, recognition of revenue on certain transactions in reporting periods
prior to contract acceptance, the recording of certain transactions that lacked
economic substance and the recording of maintenance revenue as license revenue.
The unauthorized and undisclosed agreements with resellers introduced acceptance
contingencies, permitted resellers to return unsold licenses for refunds,
extended payment terms or committed Informix to assist resellers in selling the
licenses to end-users. Accordingly, license revenues from these transactions
that were recorded at the time product was delivered to resellers should have
instead been recorded at the time all conditions to the sale lapsed. Because of
the pervasiveness of the unauthorized arrangements with resellers in the 1994,
1995 and 1996 accounting periods, Informix concluded that all revenue from
license agreements with resellers, except for those licenses sold and billed on
a per copy basis, should be recognized only when the licenses were resold or
utilized by resellers and all related obligations had been satisfied. In
addition, amounts received from resellers or financial institutions as
prepayments of software license fees in advance of revenue recognition should be
recorded as advances from customers and financial institutions. The financial
review undertaken by Informix resulted in the restatement of Informix's
financial results for fiscal 1996, 1995 and 1994 and for the first quarter of
fiscal 1997. Informix publicly disclosed the results of the restatement in
November 1997.
The nature of Informix's business in 1992 and 1993 was such that there was
not a material amount of revenues recorded under prepaid software license
transactions conducted with resellers during these years. Additionally, as a
result of Informix's extended procedures, there were no material errors or
irregularities identified affecting revenues recognized prior to the third
quarter of 1994. Informix concluded based on those circumstances that it was not
necessary to restate the financial statements for 1992 and 1993.
In connection with the errors and irregularities discussed above, a number
of conditions which collectively represented a material weakness in Informix's
internal accounting controls were identified. These conditions included a
deterioration in Informix's accounting controls at corporate and regional
management levels, and a related failure to stress the importance of these
controls, an inappropriate level of influence, principally by Informix's sales
organization, over the revenue recognition process and an apparent lack of
clarity and consistent understanding within Informix concerning the application
of Informix's revenue recognition policies to large, complex reseller license
transactions. To address the material weakness represented by these conditions,
Informix is implementing a plan to strengthen Informix's internal accounting
controls. This plan includes updating Informix's revenue recognition policies
regarding accounting and reporting for large, complex reseller license
transactions, developing and conducting educational programs to help implement
such policies, changing Informix's corporate and regional accounting and
reporting structure and re-establishing the internal audit function reporting to
Informix's Board of Directors.
As a result of the restatement, total revenues were reduced from amounts
previously reported by $204.8 million from $939.3 million as originally reported
to $734.5 million, by $77.7 million from $714.2 million as originally reported
to $636.5 million and by $18.1 million from $470.1 million as originally
82
<PAGE>
reported to $452.0 million for fiscal 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The
restatement also resulted in an increase in revenues of $16.2 million from
$133.7 million as originally reported to $149.9 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 1997. In addition, the restatement resulted in a reduction in net income
of $171.4 million from $97.8 million as originally reported to a loss of $73.6
million for fiscal 1996; a reduction in net income of $59.0 million from $97.6
million as originally reported to $38.6 million for fiscal 1995; and a reduction
in net income of $13.6 million from $61.9 million as originally reported to
$48.3 million for fiscal 1994. The restatement had a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition, most notably evidenced by the elimination of
retained earnings and working capital. At December 31, 1996, after giving effect
to the restatement, the Company's working capital decreased $255.3 million from
$258.4 million as originally reported to $3.1 million. At December 31, 1997, the
Company had a working capital deficit of $140.2 million and at September 30,
1998, the Company had a working capital deficit of $14.4 million. The
substantial reductions in working capital at December 31, 1997 and 1996 reflect
substantial operating losses and the addition of "advances from customers and
financial institutions" as a current liability on the Company's balance sheet.
Such advances totaled $180.0 million at December 31, 1997 and $239.5 million at
December 31, 1996. At September 30, 1998, such advances totaled $139.3 million.
See "Risk Factors-- Risks Relating to Informix--Working Capital Deficit."
Informix's public announcement of the pending restatement, delays in
reporting operating results for the second and third quarters of fiscal 1997
while the restatement was being compiled, threatened de-listing of Informix's
common stock from the Nasdaq National Market as a result of Informix's failure
to satisfy its public reporting obligations, corporate actions to restructure
operations and reduce operating expenses, and customer uncertainty regarding
Informix's financial condition adversely affected Informix's ability to sell its
products in fiscal 1997. In addition, since the beginning of 1997, Informix and
its competitors have experienced substantially slower growth in the market for
RDBMS products. The financial restatement has now been completed, its results
have been publicly disclosed and Informix is current with respect to its public
reporting obligations. In addition, Informix believes that it has effectively
controlled its operating expenses and significantly improved its financial
condition. Nevertheless, adverse market conditions, including significant
competitive pressures in Informix's markets and ongoing customer uncertainty
about Informix's financial condition and business prospects, may continue to
have an adverse effect on Informix's ability to sell its products and results of
operations.
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 1998
In May 1998, Informix announced that it had restated its financial results
for the first quarter ended March 31, 1998. Total revenues for the quarter
restated were $161.0 million which is a reduction of approximately $6.2 million
from the previously reported $167.2 million. In addition, the restatement
resulted in a reduction in net income of $5.3 million from $7.1 million as
originally reported to $1.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 1998. The
restatement also affected Informix's financial condition as evidenced by a
reduction in working capital and an increase in accumulated deficit. The working
capital deficit at March 31, 1998, increased $5.3 million from $86.5 million as
originally reported to $91.8 million. Informix's accumulated deficit also
increased $5.3 million from $271.0 million as originally reported to $276.3
million. The restatement of Company's financial results for the first quarter
occurred in connection with Informix's accounting treatment for license
transactions with industrial manufacturers ("IMs").
In connection with the restatement of its financial statements for fiscal
1994, 1995, 1996 and the first quarter of fiscal 1997, Informix examined both:
(1) agreements where customers committed to purchase up to a designated dollar
amount of software licenses ("Commitment Agreements"); and (2) agreements where
customers purchased licenses on a per copy basis ("Straight Purchase
Agreements"). Informix determined that unauthorized and undisclosed agreements
(which included the introduction of acceptance contingencies, permission to
return unsold licenses for refunds and extended payment terms) had been made to
certain customers in connection with Commitment Agreements, but not in
connection with Straight Purchase Agreements. Informix had entered into
Commitment Agreements with end users, IMs
83
<PAGE>
and other resellers during such prior periods, all of which were initially
accounted for on a sell-in basis (i.e., recognizing revenue upon the initial
shipment of Informix's software to the reseller). Upon further examination of
its Commitment Agreements in connection with the restatement process, Informix
determined that the unauthorized and undisclosed agreements had been made with
certain resellers, but not with end users. As a result: (1) Informix did not
restate revenue resulting from Commitment Agreements with end users; and (2)
Informix restated all revenue resulting from Commitment Agreements with all
resellers from a sell-in to a sell-through basis (i.e., recognizing revenue only
when the reseller resold or utilized the licenses and all related obligations
were satisfied).
Some of Informix's software license agreements with IMs were Commitment
Agreements and some were Straight Purchase Agreements. Instead of analyzing
every Commitment Agreement with IMs to determine whether unauthorized and
undisclosed agreements had been made, Informix conservatively treated all
Commitment Agreements with IMs as reseller agreements for accounting purposes
and restated that IM revenue to a sell-through basis. The total amount of
revenue resulting from all Commitment Agreements with IMs was not material in
fiscal 1994, 1995, 1996 or the first quarter of fiscal 1997. Straight Purchase
Agreements with IMs were not restated.
Informix initially decided to recognize revenue from IM transactions after
December 31, 1997 on a sell-in basis. Informix's license transactions with IMs
and end users are substantially similar in that upon the delivery of Informix's
software to the IM: (1) all obligations of Informix under the software license
agreement are fully performed; and (2) Informix believes the earnings process
with regard to these transactions to be complete. Accordingly, in its original
report of the financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, Informix
had recognized approximately $6.2 million in license revenue resulting from
software license agreements with IMs in the same manner as revenue resulting
from agreements with end users.
Informix subsequently decided to change its initial decision and to
recognize revenue resulting from all license transactions with IMs on a
sell-through basis upon the advice of Informix's former independent accountants,
Ernst & Young LLP. Accordingly, approximately $6.2 million in license revenue
previously recognized has been deferred and will be recognized only when the
related software licenses are resold to end user customers over a period which
Informix expects to be approximately two years.
In connection with its audit of Informix's fiscal 1997 consolidated
financial statements, Informix's former independent accountants determined that
a material weakness existed, based on the lack of appropriate resources in the
accounting and financial reporting departments of Informix and other conditions.
To address these conditions, Informix plans to hire additional finance personnel
to serve in the accounting and financial reporting departments. In the interim,
Informix has hired, and plans to continue to hire, additional finance personnel
to serve in the Finance Department. In addition, Informix has hired a number of
consultants to ensure that appropriate accounting control measures are in place.
As noted above, ongoing customer uncertainty about Informix's financial
condition and business prospects may continue to have an adverse effect on
Informix's ability to sell its products and results of operations. See "Risk
Factors--Risks Relating to Informix--Dependence on Key Personnel; Personnel
Changes; Ability to Recruit Personnel" and "Changes in and Disagreements with
Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure."
84
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND SEPTEMBER 28,
1997
The following table sets forth operating results as a percentage of net
revenues for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and September 28,
1997, respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF
NET REVENUES
------------------------
NINE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Net revenue:
Licenses............................................................... 51% 57%
Services............................................................... 49 43
--- ---
Total net revenue........................................................ 100 100
Costs and expenses:
Cost of software distribution.......................................... 5 11
Cost of services....................................................... 22 27
Sales and marketing.................................................... 37 72
Research and development............................................... 21 22
General and administrative............................................. 10 15
Write-off of goodwill and long term assets............................. -- 6
Write-off of acquired research and development......................... -- 1
Restructuring charges.................................................. (1) 23
--- ---
Total operating expenses............................................. 93 177
--- ---
Operating income (loss).................................................. 7 (77)
Interest income.......................................................... 1 1
Interest expense......................................................... (1) (1)
Other income/(expense), net.............................................. -- 3
--- ---
Income (loss) before tax................................................. 7 (74)
Income taxes............................................................. -- (2)
--- ---
Net income (loss)........................................................ 6% (76)%
--- ---
--- ---
</TABLE>
Informix's operating results for the nine-month period ended September 30,
1998 increased significantly from the same period of the prior year. This change
was due to a 8% increase in revenue coupled with a 43% decrease in operating
expenses.
REVENUES
Informix derives revenues from licensing its software and providing
post-license technical product support and updates to customers and from
consulting and training services. License revenues may involve the shipment of
product by Informix or the granting of a license to a customer to manufacture
products. Service revenues consist of customer telephone or direct support,
product update rights, consulting and training fees.
LICENSE REVENUES. Informix's products are sold directly to end-user
customers and IMs or through resellers, including OEMs, distributors and value
added resellers (VAR's). In 1996, Informix increased its focus on its reseller
channels in order to focus on partnerships with several hardware vendors to
utilize their sales forces, obtain access to their installed base of customers,
and benefit from their consulting and systems integration organizations. This
increased focus on reseller channels resulted in a significant build-up of
licenses that had not been resold or utilized by such resellers. Unsold licenses
in the amount of
85
<PAGE>
$139.3 million and $210.3 million have not been recognized as earned revenue as
of September 30, 1998 and September 28, 1997, respectively.
Informix's license revenues decreased approximately 13% to $169.4 million
from $195.6 million during the first half of 1998 as compared to the first half
of 1997. However, license revenues increased to $96.3 million for the quarter
ended September 30, 1998 as compared to $77.4 million for the corresponding
quarter in 1997, an increase of approximately 24%. As a result, license revenues
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 decreased only slightly to
$265.7 million from $273.1 million for the same period in 1997.
The decrease in license revenues during the first half of 1998, as compared
to such period in 1997, was attributable to a number of factors including an
overall decrease in the revenue growth rates in the RDBMS industry. This overall
decrease in revenue growth ranges in the RDBMS industry during 1997 and the
first half of 1998 resulted in heightened competition in the RDBMS industry
worldwide. In addition, continued uncertainty in the Asia Pacific economies and
financial markets contributed to Informix's decreased license revenue in the
first six months of the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998. Furthermore,
Informix's sales in Europe during the first six months of 1998 continued to be
adversely affected by the changes to Informix's European management in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1997 and the first quarter of fiscal 1998.
The increase in license revenues during the quarter ended September 30, 1998
as compared to the same period in 1997 primarily reflects the lower than normal
level of license revenues attained by Informix in the third quarter of 1997.
This lower than normal level of license revenues attained in the third quarter
of 1997 was primarily a result of customer uncertainty regarding Informix's
financial condition at that time. License revenues were higher for the quarter
ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the corresponding quarter in 1997 for
each of Informix's regions.
Informix had two new transactions during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 1998 which exceeded $2.5 million.
Informix recognizes revenue from license agreements with resellers when the
licenses are resold or utilized by the reseller and all related obligations have
been satisfied. Agreements with resellers frequently require cash advances from
the customer or from a financing entity to whom the customer payment streams are
sold. Amounts received in advance of revenue being recognized are recorded as
"advances from customers and financial institutions" in Informix's financial
statements. During the nine month period ended September 30, 1998, Informix
received $10.1 million in customer advances and recognized revenue from
resellers with previously recorded customer advances of $48.6 million. Included
in the $48.6 million recognized was $46.7 million of licenses which were resold
or utilized by the reseller and $1.9 million related to contractual reductions
in customer advances. Contractual reductions result from settlements between
Informix and resellers in which the customer advance contractually expires or a
settlement is structured wherein the rights to resell Informix's product
terminate without sell through or deployment of the software.
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998, Informix structured
settlements with two of its resellers. The terms of the settlements permit the
resellers to continue to sell Informix's products for specified periods of time.
At the end of each three month period, the respective customer advance will be
reduced by the greater of (i) the value of the software products resold or
utilized by the reseller or (ii) a minimum specified dollar amount. The amount
of the reduction in customer advances will be recognized as product revenue.
As of September 30, 1998, Informix had reached structured settlements with
resellers with remaining rights to resell a total of $30.2 million of Informix's
products. In accordance with the settlements, the minimum reduction in customer
advances totals $4.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 1998, and $18.2
million and $7.3 million for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000,
respectively.
86
<PAGE>
Informix's license transactions can be relatively large in size and
difficult to forecast both in timing and dollar value. As a result, license
transactions have caused fluctuations in net revenues and net income (loss)
because of the relatively high gross margin on such revenues. As is common in
the industry, a disproportionate amount of Informix's license revenue is derived
from transactions that close in the last weeks or days of a quarter. The timing
of closing large license agreements also increases the risk of
quarter-to-quarter fluctuations. Informix expects that these types of
transactions and the resulting fluctuations in revenue will continue.
However, during fiscal 1998, Informix has changed its business practices
with respect to aggressive price discounting to encourage volume purchasing by
customers, a practice which has historically been common in the RDBMS industry.
Informix is now more closely managing price discounting and is transitioning its
sales model to encourage smaller, recurring transactions. Consequently, the
number of one-time large transactions with customers has decreased and may
continue to decrease.
As discussed in Note 2 to Informix's Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1997, revenue from license
agreements with resellers, except for those licenses sold and billed on a
per-copy basis, is recognized as earned when the licenses are resold or utilized
by the reseller and all related obligations have been satisfied. In order to
properly recognize revenue on arrangements where the reseller has duplication
rights, Informix relies on accurate and timely reports from such resellers of
the quantity of licenses that have been resold or utilized. From time to time,
late or inaccurate reports are identified or corrected for a variety of reasons
including the reseller updating their reports or as a result of proactive
activities of Informix such as audits of the resellers' royalty reports.
Informix's revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenue in the quarter in
which evidence of the resale or utilization information is received. As a
result, revenue from these late or updated reports is recognized in the period
during which the reports are received. Such revenue amounts were not significant
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 and amounted to approximately $8.2
million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998. However, Informix
expects that the late or inaccurate reporting of resale or utilization of
licenses by resellers and the resulting fluctuations will continue for the
foreseeable future.
SERVICE REVENUES. Service revenues increased 22% for the the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the corresponding period of 1997.
This increase is attributable primarily to the renewal of maintenance contracts
and increased consulting revenue in connection with Informix's installed
customer base. As Informix's products grow in complexity, more support services
are expected to be required. Informix intends to satisfy this requirement
through internal support, third-party services and OEM support. The gross margin
on service revenue increased from 39% in the nine-month period ended September
28, 1997 to 55% in the comparable period of 1998.
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998, service revenue grew
faster than license revenue and as a result, service revenue represents a larger
percentage of total revenues than in the prior year comparable period. Informix
continues to emphasize support services as a source of revenue and the growth
achieved versus the prior year period reflects the continued growth in
Informix's installed base. However, comparative growth rates in service revenue
and license revenue may fluctuate from quarter to quarter.
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION. Informix's net revenues from sales to foreign
customers was 50% of total revenue during the third quarter ended September 30,
1998 as compared to 51% for the same quarter in 1997. Foreign sales increased
from $75.9 million in the quarter ended September 28, 1997 to $92.9 million in
the quarter ended September 30, 1998. For the nine-month period ended September
30, 1998, Informix's net revenues from sales to foreign customers was 52% of
total revenue as compared to 53% during the same period in 1997. Foreign sales
increased from $256.9 million in the nine-month period ended September 28, 1997
to $268.5 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998.
Sales in Europe increased 33% and 6% for the three-month period and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998, respectively, as compared to the
corresponding periods in 1997. As a percentage of
87
<PAGE>
total revenue, sales in Europe remained constant at 33% for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1998, as compared to the corresponding period in
1997. However, sales in Europe as a percentage of total revenue for the quarter
ended September 30, 1998 increased to 32% from 30% in the same quarter a year
ago. The increase in European sales from the prior year quarter was partially
due to the lower than normal level of license revenues attained in the third
quarter of 1997 as a result of customer uncertainty regarding Informix's
financial condition at that time.
Despite a significant increase in constant dollars, sales in Asia/Pacific
translated into U.S. dollars increased 5% and decreased 1% in the quarter ended
and the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998, respectively, as compared to
the corresponding periods in 1997. As a percentage of total revenue, sales
translated into U.S. dollars in Asia/Pacific remained relatively constant at 11%
and 12% for the quarter ended and the nine-month period ended September 30,
1998, respectively, as compared to 13% for both the corresponding periods in
1997.
Sales in Latin America increased 9% and 5% in the quarter ended and the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998, respectively, as compared to the
corresponding periods in 1997. As a percentage of total revenue, sales in Latin
America remained relatively constant at 7% for both the quarter ended and the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 as compared to 8% for both of the
corresponding periods in 1997.
Substantially all of Informix's Latin American revenue is U.S. dollar
denominated. In Europe, Asia/ Pacific, and Japan, most revenues and expenses are
denominated in local currencies. Informix's operating and pricing strategies
take into account changes in exchange rates over time; however, Informix's
results of operations may be significantly affected in the short term by
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, the strength of local economies, and the general volatility of
software markets may result in a higher or lower proportion of foreign revenues
as a percentage of total revenues in the future.
COST OF SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997 % CHANGE
----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Manufactured cost of software distribution.......................................... $ 10.1 $ 22.2 (55)%
Percentage of license revenue..................................................... 4% 8%
Amortization of capitalized software................................................ $ 16.6 $ 16.0 4%
Percentage of license revenue..................................................... 6% 6%
Write-down to net realizable value.................................................. $ -- $ 14.7 (100)%
Percentage of license revenue..................................................... --% 5%
Total cost of software distribution................................................. $ 26.7 $ 52.9 (50)%
Percentage of license revenue..................................................... 10% 19%
</TABLE>
Software distribution costs consist primarily of: 1) manufacturing and
related costs such as media, documentation, product assembly and purchasing
costs, freight, customs and third party royalties; and 2) amortization of
previously capitalized software development costs and any write-offs of
previously capitalized software.
88
<PAGE>
The manufactured cost of software distribution as a percentage of license
revenue decreased from 8% in the nine-month period ended September 28, 1997 to
4% in the same period of 1998. This decrease was primarily caused by a decrease
in third party software royalties, the write-off of Informix's BAAN software in
the second quarter of 1997, a reduction in labor costs and reductions in
materials and shipping costs. In the future, the cost of software distribution
as a percentage of revenue may vary depending upon sales levels, labor costs,
the success of continued cost-cutting efforts, shipping costs, the cost of third
party software that is bundled with Informix's products and whether the product
is produced by Informix or reproduced by customers.
Amortization of capitalized software costs begins in the quarter following
the commercial release of the product. The amortization of capitalized software
remained flat at 6% of license revenues in the first three quarters of 1998
compared to 6% in the first three quarters of 1997. The amortization of
capitalized software will vary slightly quarter to quarter as new products are
released and other products become fully amortized.
In addition, due to Informix's acquisition of CenterView Software, Inc. in
February 1997 and the announcement of its revised tool strategy, and in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 86,
"Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise
Marketed," a net realizable value test performed on certain of Informix's tool
products resulted in a write-down of $14.7 million of previously capitalized
software costs in the first quarter of 1997.
COST OF SERVICES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997 % CHANGE
----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cost of services.................................................................... $ 113.4 $ 128.2 (12)%
Percentage of service revenue..................................................... 45% 61%
</TABLE>
Cost of services consists primarily of maintenance, consulting and training
expenses. Cost of services for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998
decreased by 12%, as compared to the same period in 1997. This decrease was
primarily attributable to decreases of 9% in average headcount for the nine-
month period ended September 30, 1998 over the same period in 1997 as well as
improved efficiency and better control of outsourced expenses. In the future,
Informix expects that cost of services as a percentage of net service revenue
will continue to approximate the rate incurred in the first three quarters of
1998.
SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997 % CHANGE
----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and marketing expenses........................................................ $ 193.7 $ 347.9 (44)%
Percentage of net revenue........................................................... 37% 72%
</TABLE>
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions,
marketing programs and related overhead costs. The decrease in sales and
marketing expenses in the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998, in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenue, as compared to the
comparable period of 1997 was primarily the result of a significant reduction of
sales and marketing personnel worldwide. For the nine-month period ended
September 30, 1998, average headcount for sales and marketing personnel
decreased to 1,177 from 1,656 for the comparable period in 1997, a decrease of
29%. This decrease in headcount accounts for the majority of the decrease both
in percentage decline and
89
<PAGE>
absolute dollars spent. In addition, depreciation expense charged to sales and
marketing decreased approximately $11.6 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 1998 as compared to such period in fiscal 1997 in connection with
Informix's reassessment of its Superstores concept which occurred in fiscal
1997. Informix's decision to downsize, eliminate or convert Information
Superstores into solution labs managed by Informix's consulting practice,
coupled with other cost cutting measures resulted in significant charges for
restructuring in the second and third fiscal quarters of 1997.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
The following table summarizes research and development costs for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 and September 28, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997 % CHANGE
----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Incurred product development expenditures........................................... $ 121.4 $ 126.7 (4)%
Expenditures capitalized............................................................ (13.7) (18.3) (25)%
----------- -----------
Research and development expense.................................................... $ 107.7 $ 108.4 (1)%
----------- -----------
----------- -----------
Expenses capitalized as a percentage of incurred expenses........................... 11% 14%
</TABLE>
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, project
consulting and related overhead costs for product development. Informix
capitalizes software development costs incurred in developing a product once
technological feasibility of the product has been determined. Software costs
also include amounts paid for purchased software and outside development on
products which have reached technological feasibility. All software costs are
amortized as a cost of software distribution on a straight-line basis over the
remaining estimated economic life of the product. Capitalized software costs are
generally amortized over three years.
Product development expenditures decreased in absolute dollars by 4% in the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 compared to the same period in fiscal
1997. The proportion of capitalized product development expenditures as a
percentage of total incurred expenses also decreased in the nine-month period
ended September 30, 1998 compared to the same period in fiscal 1997. The
decrease for the nine-month period is attributable to the fact that, primarily
during the first half of fiscal 1997, a large portion of expenditures incurred
were on products such as Universal Data Option, formerly Universal Server, and
other related products, that had reached technological feasibility, but had not
yet been commercially released. Informix expects the proportion of work on
capitalized projects for the remainder of fiscal 1998 to remain relatively
stable compared to the first three quarters of fiscal 1998.
Significant programs currently under development include improvements and
enhancements of current products, with particular emphasis on parallel computer
architecture, user-defined database extensions, web technology integration,
database application tools and systems administration. Informix believes that
research and development expenditures are essential to maintaining its
competitive position in its primary markets and expects the expenditure levels
to remain a significant percentage of revenues.
Informix's product development efforts are expected to continue to require
substantial investments by Informix, and there can be no assurance that Informix
will have sufficient resources to make the necessary investments. In addition,
there can be no assurance that Informix's product development efforts will be
successful or that any new products will achieve significant market acceptance.
90
<PAGE>
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997 % CHANGE
----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
General and administrative expenses................................................. $ 50.5 $ 72.1 (30)%
Percentage of net revenue........................................................... 10% 15%
</TABLE>
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of finance, legal,
information systems, human resources, bad debt expense and related overhead
costs. General and administrative expenses decreased in absolute dollars in the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 compared to the same period in 1997
due primarily to a reduction in bad debt expense of $18.5 million. This
reduction reflects Informix's efforts to better manage both the amount and
credit risk of its accounts receivable balances.
WRITE-OFF OF GOODWILL AND LONG-TERM ASSETS
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 121
(FAS 121), "Accounting for the Impairment of Long Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of," Informix records impairment losses on
long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that
the assets might be impaired and the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to
be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amounts. During
the first quarter of 1997, the Company's Japanese subsidiary experienced a
significant sales shortfall and operating losses. Accordingly, Informix
evaluated the ongoing value of the subsidiary's long-lived assets (primarily
computer and other equipment) and related goodwill. Based on this evaluation,
Informix determined that the subsidiary's assets had been impaired and wrote
them down by $30.5 million to their estimated fair values. Fair value was
determined by using estimated future discounted cash flows and/or resale market
quotes as appropriate.
In the quarter ended March 31, 1998, Informix wrote off approximately $0.8
million of capitalized software. During the quarter, Informix reviewed its
portfolio of software development projects and determined $0.8 million of
previously capitalized software costs related primarily to Informix's "Data
Director for Java" and "Object Knowledge" application tools products should be
written off to cost of software distribution. Informix had developed both of
these tools products internally, although the "Data Director for Java"
application tools products were initially developed through the use of core
technology acquired from CenterView and the "Object Knowledge" application tools
products were initially developed through use of core technology acquired from
Illustra. In the first quarter of fiscal 1998, Informix (i) determined that the
Java interface required by "Data Director for Java" did not perform within
acceptable parameters in order to meet market demand; and (ii) decided to
abandon the "Object Knowledge" development process in order to focus on
developing a similar, internally-developed product called "Visionary."
Consequently, Informix canceled the development of both products and wrote off
the associated capitalized costs during the first quarter of fiscal 1998, after
it was determined that the projected sales of these tools products were not
sufficient to realize the capitalized product development costs. The review of
software development projects is performed periodically to ensure all
capitalized software costs recorded in accordance with FAS 86 are carried at an
amount not exceeding their net realizable value. Informix did not write off any
capitalized software costs in the second or third quarters of 1998.
WRITE-OFF OF ACQUIRED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
In February 1997, Informix acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
CenterView Software, Inc., a privately owned corporation that provides software
tools for application development. The aggregate purchase price was
approximately $8.7 million, which included cash plus direct costs of
acquisition. For financial statement purposes, the acquisition has been
accounted for as a purchase and, based on an independent appraisal of all the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the purchase price was allocated to
91
<PAGE>
the specifically identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, including
approximately $7 million of purchased research and development which has been
charged to operations in the first quarter of 1997, the period the acquisition
was consummated. Informix did not have any related activity in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1998.
RESTRUCTURING
In June and September 1997, Informix approved plans to restructure its
operations to bring expenses in line with forecasted revenues. In connection
with the restructuring, Informix substantially reduced its worldwide headcount
and operations to improve efficiency. The following analysis sets forth the
significant components of the restructuring charge included in current
liabilities at September 30, 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RESTRUCTURING
EXPENSE
AT DEC. 31, NON-CASH CASH ACCRUAL BALANCE
1997 COSTS PAYMENTS ADJUSTMENTS AT SEPT. 30, 1998
--------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- -------------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Severance and benefits.................... $ 21.9 $ -- $ 19.6 $ 2.2 $ 0.1
Write-off of assets....................... 48.2 48.2 -- -- --
Facility charges.......................... 34.7 9.4 11.7 5.1 8.5
Other..................................... 3.4 2.7 0.2 -- 0.5
------ ----- ----- --- ---
$ 108.2 $ 60.3 $ 31.5 $ 7.3 $ 9.1
------ ----- ----- --- ---
------ ----- ----- --- ---
</TABLE>
Severance and benefits represent the reduction of approximately 670
employees, primarily sales and marketing personnel, on a worldwide basis. As of
September 30, 1998, Informix had substantially completed this component of its
restructure plan. Write-off of assets included write-off or write-down in
carrying value of equipment as a result of Informix's decision to reduce the
number of Information Superstores throughout the world, as well as the write-off
of equipment associated with headcount reductions. The equipment subject to
write-offs and write-downs consisted primarily of computer servers,
workstations, and personal computers that are no longer utilized in Informix's
operations. Facility charges include early termination costs associated with the
closing of certain domestic and international sales offices.
Total restructuring expense decreased by $7.3 million during the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1998. This decrease was primarily due to adjusting
the estimated severance and facility charges to actual costs incurred. Informix
has substantially completed actions associated with its restructuring except for
subleasing or settling its remaining long-term operating leases related to
vacated properties.
OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE), NET
Other income/(expense) for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998
resulted primarily from a net foreign currency loss of $(2.6) million. Other
income/(expense) for the nine-month period ended September 28, 1997 resulted
primarily from a net foreign currency gain of $14.6 million. See "--Foreign
Exchange Gains and Losses."
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 28, 1997 and
September 30, 1998 resulted from taxable earnings and withholding taxes in
certain foreign jurisdictions where Informix is unable to utilize its net
operating loss carryforwards. No income tax expense resulted in the three-month
period ended September 30, 1998 due to a change in Informix's effective tax rate
for the year ended December 31, 1998. The change resulted from implementation of
measures to utilize net operating loss carryforwards in certain foreign
jurisdictions and other measures to minimize foreign tax expense.
92
<PAGE>
FOREIGN EXCHANGE GAINS AND LOSSES
Informix enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the value
of accounts receivable or accounts payable denominated in foreign currencies
against fluctuations in exchange rates until such receivables are collected or
payables are disbursed. This program involves the use of forward foreign
exchange contracts in the primary European and Asian currencies. Informix has
limited unhedged transaction exposures in certain secondary currencies in Latin
America, Eastern Europe and Asia Pacific because there are limited forward
currency exchange markets in these currencies.
In addition, in the first quarter of 1998, Informix initiated a program
whereby it enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge no
more than 80% of anticipated net income of foreign subsidiaries for up to a
maximum of one year in the future. Informix's outstanding forward exchange
contracts used to hedge anticipated net income are marked to market. This
hedging activity did not have a material impact on Informix's results of
operations for the quarter ended, and the nine-month period ended, September 30,
1998.
For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and September 28, 1997,
Informix recorded net foreign currency gains/(losses) of $(2.6) million and
$14.6 million, respectively. The restatement of the consolidated financial
statements for the quarter ended March 30, 1997 resulted in a change in
Informix's foreign currency denominated intercompany accounts receivable and
accounts payable balances. As a result, certain foreign currency forward
contracts were no longer effective as hedges. Transaction gains and losses
realized due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that were only
partially offset by gains and losses on forward foreign currency exchange
contracts and the gains and losses on the forward exchange contracts resulted in
a net foreign currency gain of $12.2 million in the quarter ended March 30,
1997.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
The following table sets forth operating results as a percentage of net
revenues for the three years ended December 31, 1997, respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
---------- ---------- -----------
PERCENT OF NET REVENUE
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues:
Licenses........................................................................... 57% 68% 73%
Services........................................................................... 43 32 27
----- ----- ---
Total net revenues............................................................... 100 100 100
Costs and expenses:
Cost of software distribution...................................................... 10 6 6
Cost of services................................................................... 25 20 14
Sales and marketing................................................................ 63 56 47
Research and development........................................................... 21 16 14
General and administrative......................................................... 13 9 8
Write-off of goodwill and long-term assets......................................... 5 -- --
Write-off of acquired research and development..................................... 1 -- --
Restructuring charges.............................................................. 16 -- --
Merger expenses.................................................................... -- 1 --
----- ----- ---
Total expenses................................................................... 154 108 89
----- ----- ---
Operating income (loss)............................................................ (54) (8) 11
----- ----- ---
Net income (loss).................................................................. (54)% (10)% 6%
----- ----- ---
----- ----- ---
</TABLE>
93
<PAGE>
Informix's operating results for fiscal 1997 were significantly below the
prior year due to decreases in license revenue and increases in costs and
expenses. Revenue declined 10% for fiscal 1997 in comparison to fiscal 1996.
Revenue declined 9%, 7%, 10% and 2% in North America, Asia/Pacific, Europe and
Latin America, respectively. The increase in operating expenses reflects
continued expansion of product and customer support organizations through the
early months of fiscal 1997 as well as incremental legal and audit expenses
related to the stockholder lawsuits and the restatement process, charges of
$30.5 million related to Informix's Japanese operations, $108.2 million for
restructuring charges, $14.7 million for write-down to net realizable value of
previously capitalized software costs and $7.0 million for a write-off of
acquired research and development during the period. The lower revenues combined
with increased operating costs resulted in an operating loss of $355.7 million
for the year. See "Business of Informix-- Legal Proceedings," "--Cost of
Software Distribution," "--Write-off of Acquired Research and Development,"
"--General and Administrative Expenses" and "--Restructuring Charges."
Informix's operating results were affected negatively in 1996 as a result of
operating expenses growing more rapidly than revenues. Informix continued to
invest heavily in personnel in the areas of sales, marketing and customer
service, and research and development and incurred integration expenses and fees
associated with the acquisition in February 1996 of Illustra. In December 1996,
Informix began shipping its Universal Server product. Informix incurred
significant marketing expenses in connection with the initial announcement and
launch of the Universal Server in fiscal 1996. These development, integration
and marketing expenses adversely affected Informix's operating margins in fiscal
1996.
REVENUES
Informix derives revenues from licensing its software and providing
post-license technical product support and updates to customers and from
consulting and training services. License revenues may involve the shipment of
product by Informix or the granting of a license to a customer to manufacture
products. Service revenues consist of customer telephone or direct support,
product update rights, consulting and training fees. Total net revenues were
$663.9 million, $734.5 million and $636.5 million for fiscal 1997, 1996 and
1995, respectively. Between December 31, 1996 and 1997, total net revenues
decreased by 10% or $70.6 million, primarily as a result of a substantial
decrease in license revenues, partially offset by an increase in service
revenues. Between December 31, 1995 and 1996, total net revenues increased by
15% or $98.0 million.
LICENSE REVENUES. Informix sells its products directly to end-users as well
as through resellers, including OEM's, distributors and VAR's. During fiscal
1996, Informix increased the focus on its reseller channels to establish
partnerships with hardware and application vendors in order to utilize their
sales force, obtain access to their installed base of customers and benefit from
their consulting and systems integration organizations. Informix recognizes
license revenue from resellers, except for those sold and billed on a per copy
basis, when the licenses are resold or utilized by the reseller and all related
obligations have been satisfied. License revenues accounted for 57%, 68% and 73%
of total revenues in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The year-to-year
declines in license revenues as a percentage of total revenues reflect the fact
that service revenues have grown at a faster pace than license revenues, and
that license revenues declined substantially in fiscal 1997.
License revenue declined by 25% to $378.2 million for fiscal 1997 from
$502.7 million for fiscal 1996. In the first quarter of fiscal 1997, license
revenues decreased 43% compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996. This
decrease was primarily due to slow growth in demand for RDBMS products as well
as Informix's inability to close a number of sales transactions that management
anticipated would close by quarter's end, particularly in Europe. In the second
quarter of fiscal 1997, license revenue increased 26% compared to the first
quarter, principally as a result of stronger product license sales in North
America. In the third quarter of fiscal 1997, license revenues decreased 29%
compared to the second quarter. The decrease in the third quarter was
attributable to a significant extent to decreased product license sales in
Europe and Latin America and customer uncertainties resulting from Informix's
announcement of the
94
<PAGE>
restatement of its financial statements in August 1997 and restructuring
activities in September 1997. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997, license
revenues increased 36% as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 1997. The
increase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997 was principally due to increased
license sales in Europe and Latin America, which Informix believes was due to
improved customer confidence about Informix and its financial condition
following the announcement of its restated financial statements.
Informix does not believe that the decrease in license revenue in fiscal
1997 compared to fiscal 1996 reflects a reduced acceptance of Informix's
products or a reduced competitive advantage of its products. Informix believes
that this decrease was primarily attributable to the slowing growth in the
market for RDBMS products and customer uncertainty about Informix's financial
condition and viability, due to Informix's operating losses in the first three
quarters of fiscal 1997, the announcement of the restatement, the delays in
reporting operating results for the second and third quarters of fiscal 1997,
the threatened de-listing of Informix's common stock from the Nasdaq National
Market as a result of Informix's failure to satisfy its public reporting
obligations, and Informix's actions to restructure operations and reduce
operating expenses. In addition, Informix experienced a significant turnover in
senior management sales positions during 1997, which adversely affected sales.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997, Informix filled certain key sales
positions through new hires, internal promotion and reorganization of its sales
force.
License revenues increased 9% to $502.7 million for fiscal 1996 from $462.1
million for fiscal 1995. The license revenue growth during fiscal 1996 reflects
an increase in sales of Informix's server products, particularly Informix's
flagship database server, OnLine Dynamic Server, partially offset by a decrease
in license revenues from its database tool products. The increase in server
product revenues during fiscal 1996 reflected continued acceptance of Informix's
server products. Informix believes that the RDBMS industry has benefited from
market acceptance of UNIX, Windows, Windows NT and other open operating
environments and trends to downsize from large proprietary computer systems.
Informix believes that the decline in license revenues derived from its database
tool products is primarily the result of competitive product offerings from
other companies.
At December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 licenses not resold by resellers
representing approximately $180.0 million, $239.5 million and $83.6 million,
respectively, were recorded as advances from customers and financial
institutions and had not been recognized as earned revenue. Licenses originally
recorded as advances from customers and financial institutions representing
approximately $64.8 million, $58.2 million and $34.2 million were sold through
reseller channels to end users during fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively,
and recognized as earned revenue. Informix estimates that approximately $50 to
$70 million of the advances from customers and financial institutions of $180.0
million at December 31, 1997 will be sold through to end-users during fiscal
1998. Nevertheless, there can be no assurances that such licenses will be
resold. If the underlying license agreements expire and are not renewed prior to
resellers' selling all licenses to end users and Informix has no remaining
obligations, the remaining revenue relating to customers' advances will be
recognized in the quarter following the expiration of the reseller license
agreements.
Informix's license transactions can be relatively large in size and
difficult to forecast both in timing and dollar value. As a result, these
transactions have caused fluctuations in net revenues and net income (loss)
because of the relatively high gross margin on such revenues. As is common in
the industry, a disproportional amount of Informix's license revenue is derived
from transactions that close in the last weeks or days of a quarter. The timing
of closing large license agreements also increases the risk of
quarter-to-quarter fluctuations. Informix expects that these types of
transactions and the resulting fluctuations will continue.
Informix is currently unable to forecast whether the decreases in license
revenue experienced in fiscal 1997 will continue in fiscal 1998. During 1997,
substantial uncertainty existed about Informix's business and financial
condition. Informix believes that various actions taken by Informix during 1997
have substantially
95
<PAGE>
improved its financial condition. See "--Restructuring Charges" and "--Liquidity
and Capital Resources." Nevertheless, adverse market conditions, including
significant competitive pressures and ongoing customer uncertainty about
Informix's financial condition and business prospects, could continue to have an
adverse effect on license revenues and results of operations.
SERVICE REVENUES. Service revenues increased 23% to $285.7 million for
fiscal 1997 from $231.8 million for fiscal 1996. Service revenues increased 33%
to $231.8 million for fiscal 1996 from $174.5 million for fiscal 1995. Service
revenues accounted for 43%, 32% and 27% of total revenues in fiscal 1997, 1996
and 1995, respectively. As Informix's products become more complex, more support
services are expected to be required. Informix intends to satisfy this
requirement through internal support, third-party services and OEM support.
Service revenues are comprised of maintenance, consulting and training revenues.
Informix continues to emphasize support services as a source of revenue and the
growth achieved in absolute dollars reflects the growth in Informix's installed
base and strategic focus on providing consulting services for its customers. The
year-to-year increases in service revenues as a percentage of total revenues
reflect the fact that service revenues have continued to grow while license
revenues declined substantially in fiscal 1997.
Revenue derived from post-contract technical support and fees for software
updates increased 18% to $188.1 million in fiscal 1997 from $159.5 million in
fiscal 1996 and 31% in fiscal 1996 from $121.9 million in fiscal 1995. This
increase is attributable principally to maintenance contracts for new license
sales in each year as well as the renewal of existing maintenance contracts. In
the event Informix continues to experience substantial declines in license
revenue, such declines would be expected to have an adverse effect on growth in
service revenues.
Consulting and training revenues increased 35% to $97.6 million in fiscal
1997 from $72.3 million in fiscal 1996 and 38% in fiscal 1996 from $52.6 million
in fiscal 1995. The growth in the consulting and training practice was driven by
increased demand for consulting services primarily in North America and in
Europe. Some significant one-time large consulting contracts were also executed
in fiscal 1997 and contributed to the significant increase of consulting
revenues year over year. There can be no assurances that similar one-time large
consulting contracts will be entered into in future periods. Failure to secure
such contracts may have an adverse impact on the growth of service revenues.
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
The Company's distribution markets are organized into four general markets:
North America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa; Latin America; and the
Asia/Pacific region, including Japan. The North America, Europe, Latin America
and Asia/Pacific organizations contributed 46%, 34%, 8% and 12% of the Company's
net revenues, respectively, in fiscal 1997, compared to 46%, 34%, 7% and 13%,
respectively, in fiscal 1996 and 45%, 36%, 6% and 13%, respectively, in fiscal
1995.
Approximately 54%, 54% and 55% of Informix's net revenues were derived from
sales to foreign customers in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Informix
expects that foreign revenues will continue to provide a significant portion of
total revenues. However, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the
condition of local economics, and the general volatility of software markets may
result in a higher or lower proportion of foreign revenues in the future. In
Europe and Asia/Pacific most revenues and expenses are now denominated in local
currencies. The U.S. dollar strengthened in fiscal 1997 against the major
European and Asia/Pacific currencies, which resulted in lower revenue and
expenses recorded when translated into U.S. dollars, compared with the prior
year periods. Although the Company has also increased its direct presence in
Latin America, a significant percentage of this region's revenue is still
denominated in U.S. dollars. Although the effect was not significant in fiscal
1997, the Company has in the past experienced significant currency fluctuations
in Mexico, and to a lesser extent, other Latin American countries, and expects
such fluctuations may occur in the future. The Company's operating and pricing
strategies take into account changes in exchange rates over time; however, the
Company's results of
96
<PAGE>
operations may be significantly affected in the short term by fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, the current continued weakness
observed in Asian currencies may result in reduced revenues from the countries
affected by this condition, thus having a negative impact on the overall
performance of the Company.
CONCURRENT TRANSACTIONS
Principally during fiscal 1996, the Company entered into software license
agreements with certain computer and service vendors where the Company
concurrently committed to acquire goods and services. These concurrent
transactions in fiscal 1996 included license agreements of approximately $170.0
million and a commitment by the Company to acquire goods and services in the
aggregate of approximately $130.0 million. Concurrent transactions in 1997
included license agreements of approximately $21 million and a commitment by the
Company to acquire goods and services in the aggregate of approximately $50
million. See Notes 1 and 2 of Notes to Consolidated Statements.
COST OF SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 CHANGE 1996 CHANGE 1995
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Manufactured cost of software distribution............. $ 26.9 (16)% $ 32.2 26% $ 25.6
Percentage of license revenue.......................... 7% 6% 6%
Amortization of capitalized software................... $ 21.4 47% $ 14.6 21% $ 12.0
Percentage of license revenue.......................... 6% 3% 3%
Write-down to net realizable value..................... $ 14.7 N.M. -- N.M. --
Percentage of license revenue.......................... 4%
Cost of software distribution.......................... $ 63.0 35% $ 46.8 24% $ 37.6
Percentage of license revenue.......................... 17% 9% 8%
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
N.M.=Not meaningful
Cost of software distribution increased to $63.0 million for fiscal 1997
from $46.8 million and $37.6 million for fiscal 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Software distribution costs consist primarily of (i) manufacturing and related
costs such as media, documentation, product assembly and purchasing costs,
freight, customs, and third-party royalties and (ii) amortization of previously
capitalized software development costs, including adjustments to the carrying
value of such capitalized costs based on changes to the carrying value of such
capitalized costs based on changes to Informix's estimates of the net realizable
value of related products.
Excluding amortization and write-down to net realizable value of previously
capitalized software development costs, cost of software distribution as a
percentage of license revenue was 7% for fiscal 1997 and 6% for both 1996 and
1995. In the future, the cost of software distribution as a percentage of
revenue may vary depending upon whether the product is reproduced by Informix or
by its customers.
Amortization of capitalized software costs commences the quarter following
product introduction. Capitalized software amortization increased 47% to $21.4
million for fiscal 1997 from $14.6 million for the prior year period. The
increase in amortization of capitalized software in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of net revenues is due to the release of Informix's Universal Server
products in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996. The absolute value of
amortization of capitalized software will vary period to period as new products
are released and other products become fully amortized.
Amortization of capitalized software increased 21% in fiscal 1996 compared
to fiscal 1995 due to the release of several products in the latter half of 1995
and 1996. The absolute value of amortization of capitalized software will vary
from quarter to quarter as new products are released and other product
development costs become fully amortized.
97
<PAGE>
The write-down to net realizable value of $14.7 million during the first
quarter of fiscal 1997 was due to Informix's acquisition of CenterView Software,
Inc. ("CenterView") and the related announcements of its revised tool strategy.
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 86,
"Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise
Marketed," a net realizable value test was performed on certain of Informix's
database tool products and resulted in a write-down of $14.7 million of
previously capitalized software costs. In addition to this write-down, Informix
recorded separately a $7.0 million charge for write-off of Acquired Research and
Development in connection with Informix's acquisition of CenterView. See
"--Write-off of Acquired Research and Development."
COST OF SERVICES
Cost of services consists primarily of maintenance, consulting and training
expenses. Cost of services increased 15% to $166.9 million for fiscal 1997 from
$144.9 million for fiscal 1996. Cost of services increased 58% to $144.9 million
for fiscal 1996 from $91.5 million for fiscal 1995. The overall growth in cost
of services of 15% between fiscal 1996 and 1997 is consistent with the 23%
growth in service revenues over the same period. The cost of services increased
significantly in fiscal 1996 as Informix substantially expanded its consulting
practice in the United States and Europe as well as its technical support
organization in order to provide customer assistance for the Online Dynamic
Server product line. Cost of services decreased as a percentage of service
revenues to 58% for fiscal 1997 compared to 62% for the same period in 1996.
During fiscal 1997, gross margins increased relative to both support revenue and
consulting/training revenue, particularly in the third and fourth quarters of
that year. Informix believes that the increased margins during fiscal 1997 were
principally attributable to more efficient delivery of services. The increase in
cost of services in fiscal 1996 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net
revenues compared to the prior year is primarily due to Informix's expansion of
consulting and support service capabilities as products have become more
complex.
SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES
Sales and marketing expenses increased less than 1% to $417.2 million for
fiscal 1997 from $413.7 million for fiscal 1996. Sales and marketing expenses
increased 37% to $413.7 million for fiscal 1996 from $301.9 million for fiscal
1995. As a percentage of revenues, sales and marketing expenses increased to 63%
in fiscal 1997 from 56% in fiscal 1996, due to a reduction in net revenues. As a
percentage of revenues, sales and marketing expenses increased to 56% in fiscal
1996 from 47% in fiscal 1995, due to significant increases in sales and
marketing personnel and marketing programs starting in late 1996.
During the late months of fiscal 1996 and in the early months of fiscal
1997, there were significant increases in personnel and expenses as Informix
continued to expand its sales force for anticipated license revenue growth and
continued to implement various marketing programs, including its Information
Superstore program. The Information Superstore program, which was launched in
fiscal 1996 and through the early months of 1997, resulted in increased
depreciation expense due to the fixed asset purchases related to the program.
The slight increase in sales and marketing expense in fiscal 1997 in absolute
dollars compared to fiscal 1996 was a result of continued increased expenses in
the early months of fiscal 1997, offset by a significant reduction in overall
sales and marketing expenses in the second half of fiscal 1997 in connection
with the restructuring plan executed by Informix.
Due to the significant revenue shortfall in the first quarter of fiscal
1997, Informix executed internal restructuring plans in the second quarter and
again in the third quarter, which included reducing headcount, consolidating
facilities and operations, and downsizing, eliminating or converting Information
Superstores into solution labs managed by Informix's consulting practice.
Informix had significantly lower sales and marketing costs in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 1997 as a result of these measures. In the fourth quarter of fiscal
1997, sales and marketing expenses were reduced to $69.3 million. Costs in the
fourth
98
<PAGE>
quarter of fiscal 1997 were 43% lower than the prior year quarter and 32% lower
than the third quarter of fiscal 1997.
The significant increase in sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 1996 in
absolute dollars compared to fiscal 1995 was a result of the addition of new
sales offices and sales personnel worldwide as Informix expanded its worldwide
sales organization, the opening of new foreign offices, higher commission
expense associated with the increase of revenues prior to the restatement and
increased marketing programs associated with new product launches.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 CHANGE 1996 CHANGE 1995
--------- ----------- --------- ------------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Incurred product development expenditures..................... $ 161.1 8% $ 148.6 44% $ 103.1
Expenditures capitalized...................................... $ 21.8 (23)% $ 28.4 62% $ 17.5
Research and development expenses............................. $ 139.3 16% $ 120.2 40% $ 85.6
Expenditures capitalized as a percentage of incurred.......... 14% 19% 17%
</TABLE>
Research and development expenses increased 16% to $139.3 million for fiscal
1997 from $120.2 million for fiscal 1996. Research and development expenses
increased 40% to $120.2 million for fiscal 1996 from $85.6 million for fiscal
1996. The year-to-year increase in research and development expenses in absolute
dollars for fiscal 1997, is attributable principally to an increase in staff
which occurred during the early part of fiscal 1997, working on new products and
product extensions. The year-to-year increase in research and development
expenses in absolute dollars for fiscal 1996 is attributable principally to an
increase in staff working on the development of new products and product
extensions, including Universal Server.
Informix accounts for its software development expenses in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, "Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed." This statement
requires that, once technological feasibility of a developing product has been
established, all subsequent costs incurred in developing that product to a
commercially acceptable level be capitalized and amortized ratably over the
revenue life of the product.
Prior to fiscal 1997, the higher capitalization in absolute dollars of
product development expenditures from year to year resulted from an increase in
the work involved in projects having already reached technological feasibility
as they neared their release dates, including Universal Data Options formerly
Informix Universal Server.
Informix believes that research and development expenditures are essential
to maintaining its competitive position in its primary markets and expects the
expenditure levels to continue to constitute a significant percentage of
revenues.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
In fiscal 1997, general and administrative expenses increased 36% to $87.5
million from $64.4 million for fiscal 1996. In fiscal 1996, general and
administrative expenses increased 26% to $64.4 million from $51.1 million for
fiscal 1995. The increase in fiscal 1997 in general and administrative expenses
in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenue was primarily the result
of the continued expansion of Informix's international operations, higher bad
debt expense of $4.6 million, incremental legal and auditing expenses of $8
million resulting from the stockholders' litigation and the restatement of
Informix's financial statements, and the write-off of certain assets of $2.2
million. General and administrative expenses increased in absolute dollars in
1996 compared to 1995 as a result of the continued expansion of Informix's
international operations.
99
<PAGE>
WRITE-OFF OF GOODWILL AND OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed of," Informix records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in
its operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be
impaired and the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by
those assets are less than the assets' carrying amounts.
In the first quarter of fiscal 1997, Informix's Japanese subsidiary
experienced a significant shortfall in business activity compared to historical
levels. This fact, coupled with continuing competitive pressures in the Japanese
market, resulted in Informix adjusting its forecasts of the subsidiary's future
cash flows and further led Informix to evaluate the recoverability of the
subsidiary's long-lived assets, including computer and other equipment, acquired
intangible assets and goodwill. As a result of this evaluation, Informix
determined that the carrying value of these long-lived assets had been impaired
and, accordingly, recorded a charge in the first quarter of $30.5 million to
write-down the assets' carrying value to their estimated fair value. Fair value
was determined using estimated future discounted cash flows of the subsidiary
and/or resale values as appropriate.
WRITE-OFF OF ACQUIRED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
In February 1997, Informix acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
CenterView, a privately owned corporation that provides software tools for
application development. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $8.7
million, which included cash plus direct costs of acquisition. For financial
statement purposes, the acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and,
based on an independent appraisal of all the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, the purchase price was allocated to the specifically identifiable
tangible and intangible assets acquired, including approximately $7.0 million of
purchased research and development which has been charged to operations in the
period the acquisition was consummated, the first quarter of fiscal 1997.
Based on a review of CenterView's current suite of products, Informix's
management identified and classified future versions of Informix's Data Director
product as in-process technology, specifically Versions 3.0 and 4.0, as of the
date of its acquisition. Data Director is an integrated development extension
for Microsoft Visual Basic that enables companies to build corporate Intranet
and client/server applications in a single environment. Data Director enhances
Visual Basic with a model-driven data access engine that manages all database
interactions between client and server, eliminating the complexity traditionally
associated with client/server development and enabling companies to build
client/server applications faster and more efficiently than with Visual Basic
alone.
Based on discussions with CenterView management, including project
development project managers regarding the stage of development of Versions 3.0
and 4.0, it was determined that these projects had not reached technological
feasibility as of the date of the CenterView acquisition, nor did these projects
have any alternative future use. This determination was based primarily on an
assessment of the history of the research and development schedules for the
projects, their current stage of development, the risks inherent in completing
the incremental research and development efforts necessary to reach
technological feasibility, and the planned general release dates. Version 3.0
was scheduled for first customer release in July 1997 while Version 4.0 was
anticipated to reach first customer release in April 1998. Based on the
discussions with CenterView management regarding historical product releases, it
was determined that commercial release occurs approximately two to three months
after first customer introduction of the product. The projects are expected to
produce positive levels of cash flow during the year ended December 31, 1998.
Moreover, Informix estimated that the costs to complete these projects would be
approximately $8.4 million in fiscal 1997 and approximately $4.2 million in
fiscal 1998. These figures were estimated by considering (i) the development
schedules of the in-process projects; (ii) complexity of the identified
development projects; and (iii) number of engineer hours per project, per year.
100
<PAGE>
The market for Informix's Data Director product is characterized by rapidly
changing technology, frequent new product introductions and evolving market and
customer demands. Although CenterView successfully developed and marketed Data
Director Version 2.1 and previous versions, there can be no assurance that
Informix will be successful in developing and marketing the enhanced versions of
the Data Director product. As such, the in-process technology embedded in Data
Director Versions 3.0 and 4.0 was valued utilizing risk-adjusted cash flows to
incorporate these and other uncertainties associated with Informix's product
development efforts. Failure to successfully complete these efforts in a timely
manner could adversely affect the market potential for the acquired CenterView
products.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In June and again in September 1997, Informix approved plans to restructure
its operations in order to bring expenses in line with forecasted revenues. In
connection with these restructurings, Informix substantially reduced its
worldwide headcount and consolidated facilities and operations to improve
efficiency. The following analysis sets forth the significant components of the
restructuring reserve at December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACCRUAL BALANCE
RESTRUCTURING NON-CASH CASH AT DECEMBER 31,
EXPENSE COSTS PAYMENTS 1997
------------- ----------- ----------- -----------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Severance and benefits..................................... $ 21.9 $ -- $ 19.5 $ 2.4
Write-off of assets........................................ 48.2 48.2 -- --
Facility charges........................................... 34.7 7.7 3.8 23.2
Other...................................................... 3.4 2.2 .2 1.0
------ ----- ----- -----
$ 108.2 $ 58.1 $ 23.5 $ 26.6
------ ----- ----- -----
------ ----- ----- -----
</TABLE>
Severance and benefits represent the reduction of approximately 670
employees, primarily sales and marketing personnel, on a worldwide basis.
Temporary employees and contractors were also reduced. Write-off of assets
include the write-off or write-down in carrying value of equipment as a result
of Informix's decision to reduce the number of Information Superstores
throughout the world, as well as the write-off of equipment associated with
headcount reductions. The equipment subject to the write-offs and write-downs
consists primarily of computer servers, workstations, and personal computers
that will no longer be utilized in Informix's operations. These assets were
written down to their fair value less cost to sell. The carrying value at
December 31, 1997, of computer equipment included in the restructuring
activities during the second and third quarters of 1997 and intended to be
disposed of, is approximately $2.2 million. Facility charges include early
termination costs associated with the closing of certain domestic and
international sales offices.
As a result of these restructuring activities, Informix was able to reduce
its operating expenses, in the form of lower depreciation expense, reduced
salaries and wages and lower rent expense, by approximately $12.2 million and
$19.7 million, respectively, in the third and fourth quarters of 1997 compared
to quarterly expense levels incurred in 1997 prior to the initiation of the
restructuring activities.
The total restructuring expense decreased by $1.2 million during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 1997 primarily due to adjusting the original estimate of the
loss to be incurred on the sale of land to the actual loss.
Informix expects to complete most of the actions associated with
restructuring by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 1998.
101
<PAGE>
MERGER EXPENSES
In the first quarter of 1996, Informix recorded expenses of approximately
$5.9 million as a result of the acquisition of Illustra, which was accounted for
as a pooling of interests. These costs consisted primarily of investment
banking, legal and accounting fees.
INTEREST INCOME
Interest income was $5.6 million as compared to $9.9 million and $8.1
million for fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The decline in fiscal 1997
in comparison to fiscal 1996 resulted from a reduction in the average
interest-bearing cash and short-term investments balances in fiscal 1997. The
reduction in cash is due to lower sales and higher expenses. The increase in
interest income from fiscal 1995 to fiscal 1996 was due to higher balances of
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, offset by slightly lower
interest rates.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense decreased to $9.4 million from $12.5 million and increased
from $6.3 million for fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Interest expense
principally relates to interest charges incurred in connection with financing of
customer accounts receivable and has decreased due to a decrease in the amount
of receivables financed.
OTHER INCOME, NET
Other income, net, increased to $10.5 million for fiscal 1997 from $2.9
million and $0.1 million in fiscal 1996 and 1995, respectively. The increase
from fiscal 1996 was due primarily to $8.1 million of net gains on the sale of
marketable securities and $8.0 million of foreign currency transaction gains,
offset partially by adjustments of $4.5 million to the carrying value of
strategic investments and $1.1 million of other expenses. Other income, net, in
fiscal 1996 consisted of $3.9 million of gain on sale of marketable securities
offset by other net expenses of $1.0 million.
The restatement of the 1996, 1995 and 1994 financial statements resulted in
a change in Informix's foreign currency denominated intercompany accounts
payable and accounts receivable balances. As a result, certain foreign currency
transaction gains and losses realized due to fluctuation in the related asset
and liability currency exchange rates were not offset by underlying gains and
losses on forward foreign currency exchange contracts used to hedge those
foreign currency exposures. Informix recorded net foreign currency transaction
gains of approximately $8.0 million, $.3 million and $.2 million in fiscal 1997,
1996 and 1995, respectively; the restatement of Informix's financial statements
affected the recorded net foreign currency transaction gains and (losses) as
follows: $7.5 million, $(0.7) million, $0.1 million and $(0.5) million in fiscal
1997, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
INCOME TAXES
In fiscal 1997, income tax expense resulted primarily from foreign
withholding taxes and taxable earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions. The
expected tax benefit computed by applying the federal statutory rate to the loss
before income taxes was substantially offset by a corresponding increase in the
valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets. Informix has provided a
valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets in excess of amounts
recoverable through carryback of net operating losses. Accordingly, realization
of the net deferred tax asset at December 31, 1997 of $34 million is not
dependent on future taxable income.
In fiscal 1996, income tax expense resulted from an increase in the
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets attributable to foreign net
operating loss carryforwards, foreign withholding taxes and taxable earnings in
certain foreign jurisdictions.
102
<PAGE>
IMPACT OF RESTATEMENT ON QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The restatement of the financial statements for fiscal 1996, 1995 and 1994
and the first quarter of fiscal 1997 had the following impact on previously
reported quarterly financial information.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER(3) THIRD QUARTER(3) FOURTH QUARTER(3)
---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
AS REPORTED RESTATED AS REPORTED RESTATED AS REPORTED RESTATED AS REPORTED RESTATED
----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year ended December 31, 1997
Net revenues............... $ 133,664 $ 149,902 $ 182,012 $ 182,527 $ 149,911 $ 150,184 $ 181,152 $ 181,279
Gross profit(2)............ 63,185 79,616 123,527 124,042 97,625 97,898 132,266 132,393
Net income (loss)(1)(2).... (140,107) (144,161) (111,377) -- (110,523) -- 9,194 --
Preferred stock dividend... -- -- -- -- -- -- (301) --
Value assigned to
warrants................. -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,601) --
----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
Net income (loss) applicable
to common stockholders..... (140,107) (144,161) (111,377) -- (110,253) -- 7,292 --
Net income (loss) per
common share:
Basic...................... $ (0.93) $ (0.95) $ (0.73) $ -- $ (0.73) $ -- $ 0.05 $ --
Diluted.................. (0.93) (0.95) (0.73) -- (0.73) -- 0.04 --
Year ended December 31, 1996
Net revenues............... $ 204,021 $ 164,985 $ 226,282 $ 160,290 $ 238,180 $ 190,600 $ 270,828 $ 218,665
Gross profit............... 160,584 121,758 178,474 113,041 189,003 141,619 218,342 166,486
Net income (loss).......... 15,891 (15,377) 21,628 (34,083) 26,181 (17,095) 34,118 (7,010)
Net income (loss) per
share:
Basic.................... $ 0.11 $ (0.10) $ 0.15 $ (0.23) $ 0.17 $ (0.11) $ 0.23 $ (0.05)
Diluted.................. 0.10 (0.10) 0.14 (0.23) 0.17 (0.11) 0.22 (0.05)
Year ended December 31, 1995
Net revenues............... $ 148,037 $ 146,325 $ 164,068 $ 142,381 $ 182,701 $ 168,002 $ 219,413 $ 179,839
Gross profit............... 121,839 120,343 134,042 112,432 150,183 137,668 178,396 136,971
Net income (loss).......... 17,646 16,177 20,184 (2,731) 23,896 7,759 35,918 17,372
Net income (loss) per
share:
Basic.................... $ 0.12 $ 0.11 $ 0.14 $ (0.02) $ 0.16 $ 0.05 $ 0.24 $ 0.12
Diluted.................. 0.12 0.11 0.14 (0.02) 0.16 0.05 0.23 0.11
Year ended December 31, 1994
Net revenues............... $ 96,242 $ 92,763 $ 106,214 $ 96,217 $ 117,081 $ 111,428 $ 150,575 $ 151,561
Gross profit............... 81,429 77,950 89,765 79,768 98,106 92,453 129,520 130,506
Net income (loss).......... 11,540 8,922 12,210 4,686 15,446 11,191 22,752 23,494
Net income (loss) per
share:
Basic.................... $ 0.09 $ 0.07 $ 0.09 $ 0.03 $ 0.11 $ 0.08 $ 0.16 $ 0.17
Diluted.................. 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.03 0.11 0.08 0.16 0.16
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------
(1) The Company recorded in the second quarter and again in the third quarter of
fiscal 1997, restructuring charges of $59.6 million and $49.7 million,
respectively. The total restructuring expenses decreased by $1.2 million
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997 primarily due to adjusting the
original estimate of the loss to be incurred on the sale of land to the
actual loss. (See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
(2) In the first quarter of fiscal 1997, the Company recorded a charge of $30.5
million to write down the carrying values of certain of its Japanese
subsidiary's long-lived assets to their fair values. During the same
quarter, the Company also recorded a charge of $14.7 million to write down
the carrying value of capitalized software development costs for certain
products to their net realizable value.
(3) The second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 1997 were restated to
reclassify interest expense on sold receivables to interest expense which
had previously been classified as a reduction of net revenues.
103
<PAGE>
The restatement of the financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal
1998 had the following impact on previously reported quarterly financial
information.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998
-----------------------
AS REPORTED RESTATED
----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
New revenues........................................................ $ 167,182 $ 160,999
Gross profit........................................................ 119,924 113,741
Net income (loss)................................................... 7,078 1,811
Preferred stock dividend............................................ (603) (603)
Value assigned to warrants.......................................... (1,594) (1,594)
----------- ----------
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders................. 4,881 (386)
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic............................................................. $ 0.03 $ (0.00)
Diluted........................................................... 0.03 (0.00)
</TABLE>
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF OR FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED AS OF OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED
---------------------------- DECEMBER 31,
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 28, -------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995
------------- ------------- --------- --------- ---------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments...................................... $ 156.4 $ 95.5 $ 155.5 $ 261.0 $ 253.2
Working capital (deficit).......................... (14.4) (254.9) (140.2) 3.1 163.6
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in)
operations....................................... (23.0) (144.0) (144.8) (29.4) 59.3
Cash and cash equivalents used in investment
activities....................................... (21.4) (75.5) (63.1) (145.3) (157.7)
Cash and cash equivalents provided by financing
activities....................................... 33.6 67.1 115.2 228.7 136.8
</TABLE>
OPERATING CASH FLOWS
Cash used by operations decreased significantly to $23.0 million for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 from $144.0 million in the same
period in 1997 due primarily to Informix's efforts to reduce operating expenses.
Cash used by operations increased significantly to $144.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 1997 from $29.4 million in 1996 due to operating expenses in
excess of revenues. Cash from operations did not provide sufficient resources to
fund Informix's operations in fiscal 1997 and 1996.
The net loss of $356.9 million for fiscal 1997, included a number of
non-cash transactions. These non-cash transactions included write-downs of long
term assets, capitalized software, goodwill and acquired research and
development and certain non-cash restructuring charges which partially offset
the net loss resulting in net cash used by operations of $144.8 million.
Net accounts receivable increased by $9.6 million as of September 30, 1998
as compared to December 31, 1997. Net accounts receivable decreased by $52.5
million to $142.0 million as of December 31, 1997 from December 31, 1996. This
decrease resulted from a $37.4 million decrease in revenues during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 1997 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996
partially offset by a reduction in its financing programs with third-party
financial institutions in fiscal 1997. Days sales outstanding ("DSO") was 71, 83
and 79 at December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Informix increased its
efforts to improve cash collections in fiscal 1997 in response to its
deteriorating cash position during the
104
<PAGE>
year. Informix expects DSO in 1998 to approximate or to slightly increase from
the fiscal 1997 levels. DSO increased from approximately 71 days in December
1997 to 74 days in September 1998. The days sales outstanding ratio is dependent
on many factors, including the mix of contract-based revenue with significant
OEMs and large corporate and government end-users versus revenue recognized on
shipments to application vendors and distributors. Cash received from customers
and third-party financial institutions in advance of revenue being recognized
has been recorded as advances on unearned license revenue; however, Informix
does not expect to finance amounts due from customers subsequent to December 31,
1997.
INVESTING CASH FLOWS
Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities decreased in the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 compared to the same period in 1997
due in large part to Informix's emphasis on increasing its working capital
position. In the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998, Informix acquired
$13.2 million of capital equipment as compared to $94.2 million during the same
period in 1997. The decrease of capital equipment purchases in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1998 resulted from Informix's reduction in employee
headcount, the related cost containment program and Informix's decision to
downsize, eliminate or convert its Superstores into solution labs managed by
Informix's consulting practice. In the future, Informix anticipates the actual
level of capital spending will be dependent on a variety of factors, including
Informix's business requirements and general economic conditions.
Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities decreased for the
year ended December 31, 1997 compared with the same period in 1996. The decrease
was due in large part to lower investments of excess cash due to the significant
decline in cash balances over the year. Significant investing activities,
excluding the investment of excess cash, during the year included additions to
software costs of $20.8 million, the sale of available-for-sale securities for
$46.0 million, purchase of the Santa Clara property and capital equipment of
$92.2 million, the purchase of CenterView for $8.7 million and net proceeds from
selling the Santa Clara property of $59.3 million.
Informix sold its interest in a strategic investment during fiscal 1997
which resulted in net proceeds of $10.4 million.
Informix planned on relocating its corporate headquarters to Santa Clara,
California, approximately 15 miles to the south of Informix's headquarters. In
January 1997, Informix entered into a two year lease for 27 acres of undeveloped
commercial real estate which required a pledge of $61.5 million in cash into a
non-interest bearing collateral account controlled by an affiliate of the
lessor. In April 1997, Informix exercised its option to purchase the land for
$61.5 million with the intent to arrange for the sale of the parcels to
unrelated third parties. The $61.5 million is reflected in the "purchases of
land and property and equipment" line of the cash flow statement. The land sales
closed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997, and $59.3 million is disclosed on
the "proceeds from disposal of land and property and equipment."
In addition, during fiscal 1997, Informix acquired $30.7 million of capital
equipment consisting primarily of computer equipment, computer software and
office equipment. Capital equipment purchases were primarily the result of
Informix's expected expansion during the first half of fiscal 1997.
In February 1997, Informix acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
CenterView, a privately owned corporation that provides software tools for
application development. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $8.7
million, which included cash plus direct costs of acquisition. For financial
statement purposes, the acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and,
based on an independent appraisal of all the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, the purchase price was allocated to the specifically identifiable
intangible assets acquired, including approximately $7.0 million of purchased
research and development which has been charged to operations in the period the
acquisition was consummated the first quarter of fiscal 1997.
105
<PAGE>
FINANCING
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities in the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 consist primarily of proceeds from
the sale of Informix's common stock to employees, and the purchase of 60,000
additional shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock at $250 per share for net
proceeds to Informix of $14.1 million in connection with the partial exercise of
the Series A-1 Warrant.
Informix's programs with third-party financing institutions in the first
half of 1997 provided financing for extended credit terms instead of such
financing being provided by Informix. This was the primary source of net cash
and cash equivalents provided by financing activities in the first half of 1997.
Cash received from customers and third-party financial institutions in advance
of revenue being recognized is reflected in the Statement of Cash Flows under
"Advances from Customers and Financial Institutions" as a financing activity.
Informix no longer enters into third-party financing arrangements involving the
sale of its receivables. See "Risk Factors Relating to Informix--Need for
Additional Financing and Working Capital Deficit."
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities in fiscal
1997 decreased in comparison to the same period in 1996. A significant portion
of the decrease was the decline in advances from customers and financial
institutions, partially offset by the proceeds from issuances of preferred and
common stock.
Informix may receive cash, either from the customer, or from a financial
institution to whom the customer payment streams due under software license
arrangements are sold, prior to the time the license fee is recognized as earned
revenue. If Informix fails to comply with the contractual terms of the specific
license agreement, Informix could be required to refund to the customer or the
financial institution the amount(s) received. However, Informix does not believe
the refunds of amounts received, if any, will have a material effect on
Informix's results of operations, financial position or cash flows. During
fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, Informix received $21.8 million, $207.2 million and
$109.3 million, respectively, of license fee payments in advance of revenue
being recognized under such transactions.
Proceeds from common stock represent stock options exercised and purchases
under the employee stock purchase plan. In September 1997, Informix's Board of
Directors authorized the repricing of outstanding stock options to purchase
common stock under Informix's stock option plans so that the exercise price of
repriced options would equal the closing sales price of Informix's common stock
as reported on The Nasdaq Stock Market on November 17, 1997, which was $7.1563.
In December 1997, Informix's Board of Directors authorized a second opinion
repricing to be effective January 9, 1998 (the "Second Repricing Effective
Date") based upon the closing sales price of Informix's common stock as of the
Second Repricing Effective Date ($5.094). Under the terms of the second
repricing, each employee, other than officers and directors of Informix, could
elect to exchange any option outstanding as of May 1, 1997 for a new option with
an exercise price equal to the closing sales price on the Second Repricing
Effective Date. Options exchanged in the second repricing may not be exercised
for a period of one year from the Second Repricing Effective Date. See
"Executive Compensation--Stock Option Repricing."
In August 1997, Informix raised net proceeds of $37.6 million through the
issuance of the Series A Preferred. In November 1997, Informix raised an
additional $50.0 million in net proceeds (excluding a $1.0 million fee paid to a
financial advisor of Informix) through the issuance of the Series B Preferred.
Simultaneously with the closing of the Series B Preferred, the holders of the
Series A Preferred exchanged all their outstanding shares of Series A Preferred
for the newly designated Series A-1 Preferred, having substantially similar
rights, preferences and privileges as the Series A Preferred with the exception
of certain amendments, including revisions to the terms under which such shares
become mandatorily redeemable.
Informix assigned its leasehold interest and its related obligations under
an office space lease in Santa Clara, California to an unrelated third party.
The lease term was for fifteen years and minimum lease
106
<PAGE>
payments amount to $96.0 million over the term. Informix remains contingently
liable for minimum lease payments under the terms of the assignment.
As of December 31, 1997, Informix was contractually obligated to purchase
approximately $4.4 million of various computer equipment.
Informix has several active software development and service provider
contracts with third-party technology providers. These agreements contain
financial commitments by Informix of $15.1 million, $11.4 million, $10.4
million, $7.3 million and $3.5 million in fiscal 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and
2002, respectively.
In December 1997, Informix Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
Informix's principal operating subsidiary ("Informix Software"), entered into a
Senior Secured Credit Agreement with a syndicate of commercial banks, including
BankBoston, N.A. as administrative agent and Canadian Imperial Bank of
Commercial as syndication agent, providing for a revolving credit facility of up
to $75 million (the "Credit Facility"). The actual amount available under the
Credit Facility, for either direct borrowings or issuances of letters of credit,
is based on 80 percent of the eligible domestic accounts receivable and 50
percent of the eligible foreign accounts receivable. Accounts receivable for an
account debtor are ineligible for purposes of the Credit Facility when (a) such
account receivable is outstanding for longer than 60 days, (b) the account
debtor or any other person obligated to make payment thereon asserts any
defense, offset, counterclaim or other right to avoid or reduce the amount of
the account receivable, but only to the extent the lenders reasonably determine
a valid defense, offset, counterclaim or other right exists and then only to the
extent of such right, (c) the account debtor or other person required to make
payment thereon is insolvent, subject to bankruptcy or receivership proceedings
or has made an assignment for the benefit of creditors or whose credit standing
is unacceptable to the lenders, and the lenders have so notified Informix, (d)
the account debtor is a lender under the Credit Facility, (e) 30 percent or more
of the accounts receivable of any account debtor is deemed ineligible because
such accounts are outstanding for longer than 60 days thus rendering all the
accounts receivable of that debtor ineligible and (f) the lender reasonably
deems not to qualify an account receivable as eligible and provides a reasonably
detailed written explanation to Informix. Under the Credit Facility, foreign
accounts receivable that are backed by a letter of credit issued or confirmed by
a financial institution approved by the lenders are deemed to be domestic
accounts receivable. As a result, the aggregate amount available under the
Credit Facility will vary from time to time based on the amount and eligibility
of Informix's receivables. As of December 31, 1997, no borrowings were
outstanding under the Credit Facility, Informix's accounts receivable totaled
$142 million and its borrowing base under the Credit Facility was $47 million.
The purpose of the Credit Facility is to provide Informix working capital
and finance general corporate purposes. The term of the Credit Facility is two
years. Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility bear interest at a premium
over one of two alternative variable rates selected by Informix. The "Base Rate"
equals the greater of (i) the rate of interest announced by BankBoston, N.A. as
its "base rate" and (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 1/2 of 1% per
year. The "Adjusted LIBOR Rate" equals (i) the London Interbank Offered Rate
divided by (ii) one minus the applicable reserve requirement under Regulation D
of the Federal Reserve Board. The maximum premium over the Base Rate is 1.25%,
and the maximum premium over the LIBOR Rate is 2.50%, subject to downward
adjustment based on Informix's realizing certain financial thresholds. The
Credit Facility is secured by all of the assets of Informix Software and the
capital stock of Informix's subsidiaries that are domiciled in the United
States, including Informix Software. As of June 30, 1998, the availability of
the Credit Facility was subject to Informix's compliance with certain covenants,
including the following financial covenants requiring Informix to: (a) maintain
a ratio of 1.25 to 1.00 in respect of the sum of cash and accounts receivable to
the difference of current liabilities less deferred and unearned revenues; (b)
maintain quarterly revenues which do not include any restated revenue resulting
from Informix's November 1997 restatement of its financial statements of $150.0
million through June 1998 and $160.0 million thereafter; however, the Credit
Facility was amended to reduce the Minimum Quarterly Revenue from $150.0 million
to $144.0 million through June 1998 and
107
<PAGE>
from $160.0 million to $154.0 million thereafter; (c) maintain quarterly
operating loss of no more than $10.0 million through the quarter ending March
31, 1998 and a quarterly operating profit of at least $10 million for the
quarter ending June 30, 1998 and a quarterly operating profit of at least $15
million thereafter; (d) maintain, for the quarter ending June 30, 1998 and each
quarter thereafter, a positive quarterly cash flow consisting of operating
income which does not include any restated revenue resulting from Informix's
November 1997 restatement of its financial statements, capitalized software
costs, capital expenditures or cash outlays in respect of accrued expenses
arising from restructuring charges (but which income figure does take into
account depreciation and amortization expenses); (e) maintain an interest
coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00 in respect of quarterly operating cash flow to
interest expense plus scheduled amortization of debt; (f) refrain from making
additional investments in fixed or capital assets, in any fiscal year, in excess
of $15.0 million, plus any carry forward amount which carry forward amount
cannot exceed $5.0 million; and (g) refrain from entering into any merger,
consolidation, reorganization or other transaction resulting in a fundamental
change. At June 30, 1998, Informix was in compliance with all financial
covenants under the Credit Facility, except for those described in (d) and (e)
above pertaining to Informix's cash flows for the quarter ended June 30, 1998.
However, the lenders waived Informix's non-compliance with covenants (d) and (e)
discussed above for Informix's quarter ended June 30, 1998 and amended the
Credit Facility so that it now includes less restrictive financial covenants. At
September 30, 1998, Informix was in compliance with all of the covenants under
the amended Credit Facility. At September 30, 1998, no borrowings were
outstanding under the Credit Facility. See "Risk Factors--Risks Relating to
Informix--Need for Additional Financing."
SUMMARY
Informix believes that its current cash balances, cash available under the
Credit Facility and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet its
working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months.
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RATE RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK
Informix's exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates
relates primarily to Informix's investment portfolio. Informix does not use
derivative financial instruments in its investment portfolio. Informix places
its investments with high quality issuers and, by policy, limits the amount of
credit exposure to any one issuer. Informix is averse to principal loss and
ensures the safety and preservation of its invested funds by limiting default,
market and reinvestment risk. Informix classifies its cash equivalents and
short-term investments as "fixed rate" if the rate of return on such instruments
remains fixed over their term. These "fixed-rate" investments include fixed rate
U.S. government securities, municipal bonds, time deposits and certificates of
deposits. Informix classifies its cash equivalents and short-term investments as
"variable rate" if the rate of return on such investments varies based on the
change in a predetermined index or set of indices during their term. These
"variable-rate" investments primarily include money market accounts held at
various securities brokers and banks. The table below presents the amounts and
related weighted interest rates of Informix's investment portfolio at September
30, 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE
INTEREST RATE COST FAIR VALUE
------------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash equivalents
Fixed rate............................................. 5.47% $ 75,733 $ 75,733
Variable rate.......................................... 5.60% $ 5,454 $ 5,454
Short-term investments
Fixed rate............................................. 5.50% $ 11,507 $ 11,506
Variable rate.......................................... -- $ -- $ --
</TABLE>
108
<PAGE>
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
Informix enters into forward foreign exchange contracts primarily to hedge
the value of accounts receivable or accounts payable denominated in foreign
currencies (mainly European and Asian foreign currencies) against fluctuations
in exchange rates until such receivables are collected or such payables are
disbursed. Informix's accounting policies for these contracts are based on
Informix's designation of the contracts as hedging transactions. The criteria
Informix uses for designating a contract as a hedge include the contract's
effectiveness in risk reduction and one-to-one matching of derivative
instruments to underlying transactions. Gains and losses on forward foreign
exchange contracts are deferred and recognized in income in the same period as
losses and gains on the underlying transactions are recognized and generally
offset. If an underlying hedged transaction is terminated earlier than initially
anticipated, the offsetting gain or loss on the related forward foreign exchange
contract would be recognized in income in the same period. Subsequent gains or
losses on the related contract would be recognized in income in each period
until the contract matures, is terminated or sold. Informix operates in certain
countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia Pacific where there are
limited forward currency exchange markets and thus Informix has unhedged
transaction exposures in these currencies. However, such exposures are not
material to Informix's financial statements for any period presented. In
addition, since Informix enters into forward contracts only as a hedge, any
change in currency rates would not result in any material net gain or loss as
any gain or loss on the underlying foreign currency denominated balance would be
offset by the gain or loss on the forward contract. The table below provides
information about Informix's foreign currency forward exchange contracts at
September 30, 1998. The information is provided in U.S. dollar equivalents and
presents the notional amount (contract amount) and the weighted average
contractual foreign currency exchange rates. All contracts mature within twelve
months.
Subsequent to fiscal year end 1997, Informix began entering into forward
foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge no more than 80% of anticipated net
income of foreign subsidiaries of up to a maximum of one year in the future.
From an accounting perspective, these hedges are considered to be speculative.
Informix's outstanding forward exchange contracts used to hedge anticipated net
income are marked to market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 CONTRACT RATE FAIR VALUE
- ---------------------------------------- CONTRACT VALUE ------------------ -----------------
-----------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Forward currency contracts sold:
Deutsche Mark........................... $ 18,806 $ 1.71 $(233)
Japanese Yen............................ 9,560 129.50 455
British Pound........................... 8,925 1.65 (250)
Korean Won.............................. 4,900 1,435.54 (188)
Singapore Dollar........................ 4,496 1.69 3
Australian Dollar....................... 3,259 1.65 84
Swiss Franc............................. 2,536 1.39 8
French Franc............................ 1,668 6.00 (103)
Taiwanese NT............................ 1,267 34.01 20
Italian Lira............................ 1,119 1,787.40 (83)
Other (individually less than $1
million).............................. 6,609 NM (144)
-------- -----
Total................................... $ 63,145 $(431)
-------- -----
-------- -----
Forward currency contracts purchased:
British Pound........................... $ 50,462 $ 1.69 $ 231
French Franc............................ 12,089 5.62 (60)
Swedish Krona........................... 3,163 7.88 (6)
Denmark Krone........................... 1,510 6.39 (4)
Deutsche Mark........................... 1,201 1.67 (13)
Other (individually less than $1
million).............................. 1,916 NM (8)
-------- -----
Total................................... $ 70,341 $ 140
-------- -----
-------- -----
Grand Total............................. $ 133,486 $(291)
-------- -----
-------- -----
</TABLE>
109
<PAGE>
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
GENERAL
Many currently installed computer systems and software products are coded to
accept only two digit entries in the date code field. These date code fields
will need to accept four digit entries to distinguish 21st century dates from
20th century dates. As a result, in less than two years, computer systems and/or
software used by many companies may need to be upgraded to comply with Year 2000
requirements. Significant uncertainty exists in the software industry concerning
the potential effects associated with such compliance.
Informix has begun to:
- Review the Year 2000 compliance status of the software and systems used in
its internal business processes; and
- Obtain appropriate assurances of compliance from the manufacturers of
these products and agreement to modify or replace all non-compliant
products.
Informix expects this work to be substantially complete by the Fall of 1999.
In addition, Informix is considering converting certain of its software and
systems to commercial products from third parties that are known to be Year 2000
compliant. This conversion will require:
- The dedication of substantial time from both Informix administrative and
management information personnel;
- The assistance of consulting personnel from third party software vendors;
and
- The training of Informix's personnel using such systems.
Based on the information available to date, Informix believes it will be
able to complete its Year 2000 compliance review and make necessary
modifications prior to the end of 1999. Software or systems which are important
to Informix's business are scheduled to be Year 2000 compliant by the end of
1998. To the extent Informix is relying on the products of other vendors to
resolve Year 2000 issues, there can be no guarantee that Informix will not
experience delays in implementing such products. Informix could incur
substantial costs and disruption of its business if key systems, or a
significant number of systems, were to fail as a result of Year 2000 problems or
if Informix were to experience delays in implementing Year 2000 compliant
software products.
STATE OF READINESS
Informix's Year 2000 project is divided into four major sections as follows:
- Informix Product Readiness;
- Information Systems Operations & Applications Software (IS Systems);
- Third-party Suppliers; and
- Global Business Processes (includes Facilities, Legal, Manufacturing,
Technical Support, Sales, Product Management and Development, Marketing
and Finance).
Informix has engaged Arthur Andersen LLP to help Informix with its Year 2000
project.
The general phases common to all sections are:
- Increasing Informix employee awareness through various forms of
communication;
110
<PAGE>
- Taking an inventory of items relevant to Year 2000 (including computer
hardware, software, telecommunications equipment, embedded controllers
within our facilities, and other non-computer related equipment),
assigning priorities to identified items for assessment and possible
renovation, and assessing the status of Year 2000 compliance of items
which have been determined to be material to Informix;
- Repairing or replacing material items that are not Year 2000 compliant;
- Testing or updates given by third party suppliers; and
- Designing and implementing contingency and business continuity plans for
each internal Informix organization and location during the Year 2000
rollover period. Material items are those items which are believed by
Informix to have a negative impact on customer service, involve a risk to
the safety of individuals, that may cause damage to property or the
environment, or that may affect revenue.
By November, 1998 Informix expects that the first phase of each section of
the project will be completed. The second phase is expected to be completed by
the end of 1998. The third phase will continue into the first half of 1999 as
various departments perform tests, or receive compliance information from
third-party suppliers. The testing phases of the project are being performed
primarily by Informix, with the exception of certain key applications which will
be analyzed, and possibly renovated and tested, by third-parties.
Informix has a business continuity program in development to ensure that
core business units remain viable and responsive during any interruption of the
renovation of its systems. Year 2000-related anomalies that may impact core
business units will also be addressed in this program. A working plan of the
program should be available within the third quarter of 1999.
INFORMIX PRODUCT READINESS. All currently supported Informix database
server products, beginning with the version 5 family, are believed to be Year
2000 compliance. Informix defines "Year 2000 compliant" to mean that "the use or
occurrence of the dates on or after January 1, 2000 will not adversely affect
the performance or functionality of the Informix database server products with
respect to four-digit year dates or the ability of such products to correctly
create, store, process, and output information related to such date data,
including Leap Year calculations." However, Informix's Year 2000 compliance may
be affected by other parts of the system in which Informix's database server
products are used, as discussed below.
In addition, all currently supported Informix application development tool
products and client API products are believed to be Year 2000 compliant, as well
as all connectivity products, Gateway products, DataBlades, C-ISAM, Metacube,
and OnLine/Optical.
Informix products often depend on data from other parts of the system in
which they are being used. Year 2000 compliance is not effective unless all of
the hardware, operating system, other software, and firmware being used along
with the Informix products correctly interpret and/or translate date data into a
four digit year date and properly exchange date data with Informix products.
Data integrity is critical and therefore Informix is taking steps to
thoroughly test our products under different scenarios.
IS SYSTEMS. The IS operations of Informix consist of all computer hardware,
systems software and telecommunications. Informix's current hardware inventory
includes PC Desktops, PC Laptops, UNIX servers, UNIX workstations, and NT
workgroup servers. Informix's current software inventory includes Windows 95
operating system and MS Office products, Product Development environment tools
for UNIX, and various management systems. Informix's telecommunications
equipment includes both voice and data services, including PBX systems,
voicemail, ACD, video conferencing, local area networks ("LANs"), wide area
networks ("WANs"), and remote access equipment. Conversion and implementation
111
<PAGE>
of these components is estimated to be completed by June, 1999. Testing is
ongoing as hardware or system software is renovated or replaced. Contingency
planning is scheduled to commence in the first quarter of 1999. All IS
operations activities are expected to be completed by the third quarter of 1999.
The applications software section includes both the conversion of
applications software that is not Year 2000 compliant and the replacement of
such software (where available from the supplier). Significant portions of
Informix's key applications have already been renovated. In 1998, Informix began
a worldwide business systems replacement project with systems that use programs
primarily from SAP America, Inc. The purpose of this replacement project was to
improve access to business information through common, integrated computing
systems across Informix. The SAP systems are scheduled for completion by
mid-1999. The remaining key business software programs are expected to be Year
2000 compliant by the end of 1998. Applications supplied by other vendors are
expected to be renovated, replaced, or retired by early 1999. None of Informix's
other information technology projects have been delayed due to the
implementation of the Year 2000 project. Contingency planning for this section
is scheduled to begin in third quarter 1998 and be completed by mid-1999.
THIRD-PARTY SUPPLIERS. This section includes the process of identifying and
prioritizing critical suppliers and communicating with them about our plans and
progress in addressing the Year 2000 problem and how their individual compliance
can impact our success. Informix has begun detailed evaluations of the most
critical suppliers. These evaluations will be followed by the development of
contingency plans, which are scheduled to begin in certain departments in the
fourth quarter of 1998, with completion by mid-1999. Follow-up reviews are
scheduled through the remainder of 1999.
GLOBAL BUSINESS PROCESSES. Informix has begun developing plans detailing
the tasks and resources required for the global business processes section. This
section includes the hardware, software and associated embedded computer chips
that are used in the operation of all facilities operated by Informix. It also
includes readiness in key Informix business areas, including Finance, Technical
Support, and Legal. All repair and testing of embedded systems is scheduled to
be completed by year-end 1999. Contingency planning for this section is
scheduled to begin in first quarter 1999 and be completed by year-end 1999.
COSTS
The total cost associated with required modifications to become Year 2000
compliant is expected to be material to Informix's financial position. The
estimated total cost of the Year 2000 project is approximately $4.5 million. The
total amount expended on the project through September 30, 1998 was less than
$100,000. The estimated future cost of completing the Year 2000 project is
estimated to be approximately $4.4 million. Informix estimates that this amount
will be spent as follows:
- $2 million for capital expenditures to repair or replace software and
related hardware;
- approximately $500,000 for capital expenditures to repair or replace
non-IS equipment; and
- $1.9 million for non-capital expenses for Technical Support, Operations,
IS Operations and Applications, and the Year 2000 Program Office. Funds
for all non-capitalized items related to the project are provided from a
separate Year 2000 G&A budget. Capital costs are included in Informix
organizational capital budgets. The costs of implementing the SAP systems
is not included in these cost estimates as it is seen as a general
business enhancement which is not Year 2000 specific.
RISKS
The failure to correct a material Year 2000 problem could result in an
interruption in, or a failure of, certain normal business activities or
operations. Such failures could negatively affect Informix's business. Due to
the general uncertainty inherent in the Year 2000 problem, Informix is unable to
determine at this time whether the consequences of Year 2000 failures will have
a material adverse impact on Informix's business. In addition, Informix is
exposed to the risk of general infrastructure disruptions that may affect
112
<PAGE>
the availability of personnel throughout the Year 2000 rollover period. In
addition, Year 2000 issues may affect the purchasing patterns of customers and
potential customers. Many companies are expending significant resources to
correct their current software systems for Year 2000 compliance. These
expenditures may result in reduced funds available to purchase software products
such as those offered by Informix, which could have a negative effect on
Informix's business.
The Year 2000 Project is expected to significantly reduce Informix's level
of uncertainty about the Year 2000 problem and, in particular, about the Year
2000 compliance and readiness of its material third parties suppliers. Informix
believes that the possibility of significant interruptions of normal operations
will be reduced with the implementation of new business systems and completion
of the project as scheduled.
EUROPEAN MONETARY CONVERSION
On January 1, 1999, a new currency, the Euro, will become the legal currency
for eleven of the fifteen member countries of the European Economic Community.
Between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2002, governments, companies and
individuals may conduct business in these countries in both the Euro and the
existing national currencies. On January 1, 2002, the Euro will become the sole
currency in these countries.
Informix is evaluating the impact of conversion to the Euro on its business.
In particular, Informix is reviewing:
- Whether it may have to change the prices of its products in the different
countries because they will be denominated in the same currency in each
country;
- Whether its internal software systems can process transactions denominated
either in current national currencies or the Euro, including converting
currencies using computation methods specified by the European Economic
Community;
- The cost to Informix if it must modify or replace any of its internal
software systems; and
- Whether it will have to change the terms of any financial instruments in
connection with its hedging activities.
Based on current information and Informix's initial evaluation, Informix
does not expect the cost of any necessary corrective action to have a material
adverse effect on its business. However, Informix will continue to evaluate the
impact of these and other possible effects of the conversion to the Euro on its
business. Informix cannot guarantee that the costs associated with conversion to
the Euro will not in the future have a material adverse effect on its business.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
In May 1998, Informix dismissed Ernst & Young LLP as Informix's independent
accountants and engaged KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as Informix's independent
accountants. See "Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure."
In July 1998, Informix adopted its 1998 Non Statutory Stock Option Plan
under which it reserved 5,500,000 shares of its common stock for issuance to
employees and consultants of Informix other than executive officers and
directors.
Subsequent to September 30, 1998, holders of the Series B Preferred elected
to convert an additional 9,350 shares of Series B Preferred into 2,130,069
shares of common stock of Informix. In connection with such conversions,
Informix also issued such Series B Preferred stockholders warrants to purchase
up to 426,010 shares of common stock of Informix, at an exercise price of $7.84
per share and paid cash dividends in the amount of $442,863 to such
stockholders.
113
<PAGE>
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
On May 20, 1998, Informix filed a current report on Form 8-K (the "Form
8-K") regarding its dismissal of Ernst & Young LLP as its independent
accountants and the engagement of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as Informix's
independent accountants. The contents of that report are as follows:
FORM 8-K FILED ON MAY 20, 1998
ITEM 4. CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
On May 12, 1998, Informix's Board of Directors approved a resolution (i) to
dismiss Ernst & Young LLP ("E&Y") as Informix's independent accountants,
effective upon management's notification of E&Y of the dismissal; and (ii)
concurrent with such notification, to engage KPMG Peat Marwick LLP ("KPMG") as
Informix's independent accountants upon such terms as may be negotiated by
management.
On May 13, 1998, Informix's management notified E&Y of the dismissal. On May
19, 1998, Informix engaged KPMG as Informix's independent accountants.
E&Y's reports with respect to Informix's financial statements for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997 did not contain an adverse opinion or a
disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
accounting principles.
In connection with the audits of Informix's financial statements for each of
the two fiscal years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997 and in the subsequent
interim period, except as described in the next paragraph, there were no
disagreements with E&Y on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure or auditing scope and procedures which, if not
resolved to the satisfaction of E&Y would have caused E&Y to make reference to
the matter in their report.
E&Y advised Informix that it disagreed with Informix's recognition of
revenue resulting from software license transactions with industrial
manufacturers which occurred during the first quarter ended March 31, 1998. The
disagreement was resolved to the satisfaction of E&Y with the result that
approximately $6.2 million in revenue has been deferred and will be recognized
over a period which Informix expects to be approximately two years. Informix
intends to file immediately an amendment to its quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 to restate its financial results for the
period. The Audit Committee has discussed the accounting of these transactions
with management and E&Y.
Informix has authorized E&Y to respond fully to the inquiries of KPMG as the
successor independent accountants of Informix. Prior to accepting its engagement
as Informix's successor independent accountants, KPMG had the opportunity to
discuss with E&Y the subject matter of the disagreement described above and
other matters relevant to Informix. KPMG has not offered any report or advice to
Informix concerning such disagreement that was important to Informix's decision
in reaching a resolution.
During Informix's fiscal years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, and through
March 31, 1998, the following reportable events occurred:
In connection with the restatement of Informix's financial statements for
fiscal years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, and the quarter ended March
30, 1997, a number of conditions which collectively represented a material
weakness in Informix's internal accounting controls were identified. These
conditions included a deterioration in Informix's accounting controls at
corporate and regional management levels, and a relative failure to stress the
importance of these controls; an inappropriate level of influence, principally
by the sales organization, over the revenue recognition process; and an apparent
lack of clarity and consistent understanding within Informix of the application
of Informix's revenue recognition policies to large, complex reseller license
transactions. Informix is implementing a plan to
114
<PAGE>
strengthen Informix's internal accounting controls. This plan includes updating
Informix's revenue recognition policies regarding accounting and reporting for
large, complex reseller license transactions, developing and conducting
educational programs to help implement such policies, changing Informix's
corporate and regional accounting and reporting structure and re-establishing an
internal audit function reporting to Informix's Board of Directors.
On April 29, 1998, E&Y informed the Audit Committee of the Board that it
considered that, in connection with the audit of Informix's fiscal 1997
consolidated financial statements, the lack of appropriate resources in the
accounting and financial reporting departments of Informix constituted a
reportable condition.
Informix requested that E&Y furnish a letter addressed to the Commission
stating whether E&Y agreed with the above statements. A copy of that letter,
when received by Informix, will be promptly filed with the Commission as Exhibit
16.1 to the Form 8-K.
RESPONSE OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
On May 29, 1998 Ernst & Young furnished Informix with the following response
letter concerning the information contained in the Form 8-K which response
letter Informix filed with the Commission on Form 8-K/A on June 2, 1998 (the
"Form 8-K/A").
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Gentlemen:
We have read Item 4 of Form 8-K dated May 20, 1998, of Informix Corporation
and believe it is not complete as to reportable events as described in Item
304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. We believe the ninth paragraph of Item 4
included on page 3 therein should be replaced by the following two sentences. On
April 29, 1998, E&Y informed the Audit Committee of the Board that, in
connection with the audit of Informix's fiscal 1997 consolidated financial
statements, the lack of appropriate resources, analyses, and process structure
in the accounting and financial reporting departments of Informix resulted in
delays in closing the books, numerous and material amounts of post-closing
entries and audit adjustments required to be recorded by Informix, and
difficulty in accumulating accurate information necessary for financial
statement disclosure in a timely manner. E&Y considers this condition to be a
material weakness.
We are in agreement with the statements contained in the first sentence of
the second paragraph, the third paragraph, the fourth paragraph, the first
sentence of the fifth paragraph, the first part of the second sentence of the
fifth paragraph through and including the words "has been deferred", the fourth
sentence of the fifth paragraph as it relates to our Firm, the first sentence of
the sixth paragraph, the seventh paragraph, the first and second sentence of the
eighth paragraph, and the first sentence of the tenth paragraph on pages 2 and 3
therein. In addition, we have no basis to agree or disagree with other
statements of the registrant contained therein.
Regarding the registrant's statements concerning the lack of internal
controls to prepare financial statements, included in the eighth and ninth
paragraphs of Item 4 on page 2 and 3 therein, we had considered such matters in
determining the nature, timing and extent of procedures performed in our audit
of the registrant's consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996, 1995, and 1994.
115
<PAGE>
INFORMIX MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth certain information concerning Informix's
executive officers and directors and their ages as of September 30, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ------------------------------------------- --- ---------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.................... 47 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors-Class III, term to expire at 1999 Annual
Stockholder Meeting
Jean-Yves F. Dexmier....................... 47 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Karen Blasing.............................. 42 Vice President, Business Development Finance
Susan T. Daniel............................ 56 Vice President, Human Resources
James F. Engle............................. 52 Vice President and Treasurer
Diane L. Fraiman........................... 42 Vice President, Corporate Marketing
J.F. Hendrickson, Jr....................... 59 Vice President, Customer Services, and Lenexa (Kansas) Site
General Manager
Stephen E. Hill............................ 39 Vice President and General Manager, Tools Business Unit
Donald W. Hunt............................. 43 Vice President, North American Field Operations
Gary Lloyd................................. 51 Vice President, Legal, General Counsel and Secretary
Leonard Palomino........................... 38 Vice President and General Manager, Data Warehousing
Wesley Raffel.............................. 43 Vice President and General Manager, Web and
E-Commerce
Stephanie P. Schwartz...................... 49 Vice President, Corporate Controller
Michael R. Stonebraker..................... 55 Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
F. Steven Weick............................ 53 Vice President, Research & Development
Leslie G. Denend (3)....................... 57 Director-Class I, term to expire at 2000 Annual Stockholder
Meeting
Albert F. Knorp, Jr. (2)(3)................ 63 Assistant Secretary and Director-Class III, term to expire at
1999 Annual Stockholder Meeting
James L. Koch (1)(2)(3).................... 54 Director-Class II, term to expire at 2001 Annual Stockholder
Meeting
Thomas A. McDonnell (1)(2)................. 53 Director-Class II, term to expire at 2001 Annual Stockholder
Meeting
George Reyes (2)........................... 44 Director-Class I, term to expire at 2000 Annual Stockholder
Meeting
Cyril J. Yansouni (1)(2)(3)................ 56 Director-Class I, term to expire at 2000 Annual Stockholder
Meeting
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Member of Compensation Committee
(2) Member of Audit Committee
(3) Member of Nominating Committee
ROBERT J. FINOCCHIO, JR. has served as Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer since July 1997. From December 1988 until May 1997, Mr.
Finocchio was employed with 3Com Corporation ("3Com"), a global data networking
company, where he held various positions, most recently serving as President,
3Com Systems. Prior to his employment with 3Com, Mr. Finocchio held various
executive positions in sales and service with Rolm Communications, a
telecommunications and networking company, most recently as
116
<PAGE>
Vice President of Rolm Systems Marketing. Mr. Finocchio also serves as a
director of Latitude Communications, a teleconferencing company. Mr. Finocchio
is also a Regent of Santa Clara University. Mr. Finocchio holds a B.S. in
economics from Santa Clara University and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business
School.
JEAN-YVES F. DEXMIER has served as Informix's Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer since October 1997. Mr. Dexmier also served as
Informix's Secretary from October 1997 to February 1998. Mr. Dexmier served as a
strategy consultant to high technology companies from February 1997 to September
1997. From November 1995 until February 1997, Mr. Dexmier served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Octel Communications Corporation, a
provider of voice messaging systems ("Octel"). From April 1995 to October 1995,
Mr. Dexmier served as Chief Financial Officer for Kenetech Corporation, a wind
energy company. From May 1994 to March 1995, Mr. Dexmier served as Chief
Financial Officer for Air Liquide America Corporation, a U.S. subsidiary of the
French-based group Air Liquide, a worldwide producer of industrial gases. From
January 1991 to January 1994, Mr. Dexmier served as Chief Financial Officer for
Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., a subsidiary of Thomson SA, a worldwide
electronics manufacturer. Mr. Dexmier holds a B.S. in mathematics from Lycee
Pasteur, a Ph.D. in electronics from the Ecole Nationale Superieure de
l'Aeronautique et de l'Espace and an M.B.A. in economics and finance from the
Ecole Polytechnique. In addition, he attended the executive management program
at the University of Michigan School of Business Administration.
KAREN BLASING has served as Informix's Vice President, Business Development
Finance since May 1998. Prior to that time, Ms. Blasing served as Informix's
Corporate Controller since June 1996 and as a Vice President of Informix since
August 1997 before resigning from such positions in April 1998. Ms. Blasing
joined Informix in November 1992 as its Director of Financial Reporting and
Analysis. From January 1989 to October 1992, Ms. Blasing was a Senior Financial
Manager at Oracle Corporation, a provider of information management software and
services. Ms. Blasing holds a B.S. in both economics and business from the
University of Montana and an M.B.A. from the University of Washington.
SUSAN T. DANIEL has served as Informix's Vice President, Human Resources
since February 1998. From March 1981 until February 1998, Ms. Daniel served in a
variety of positions at Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., a semiconductor
manufacturer, most recently as Vice President, Human Resource Operations. Ms.
Daniel holds a B.A. in History from Queens College, an M.A. in social studies
from Syracuse and J.D. from Santa Clara University.
JAMES F. ENGLE has served as Informix's Vice President and Treasurer since
December 1997. Mr. Engle served as acting Corporate Controller of Informix from
April 1998 until June 1988. From 1991 until December 1997, Mr. Engle served as a
Vice President and the Corporate Treasurer of Octel. Mr. Engle holds a B.A. in
economics from the University of Missouri and an M.B.A. in international
business and corporate finance from the Columbia University Graduate School of
Business.
DIANE L. FRAIMAN has served as Informix's Vice President, Corporate
Marketing since April 1998. From September 1996 to March 1998, Ms. Fraiman
served as Vice President, Marketing Video & Networking Division, at Tektronix,
Inc., a producer of hardware and software networking and video products. From
May 1994 to August 1996, Ms. Fraiman was Director of Marketing at Sequent, a
manufacturer of large-scale multiprocessor systems. From 1978 to April 1994, Ms.
Fraiman worked in a variety of positions at Digital Equipment Corporation, a
global networking company, most recently as its Director, Corporate
Digital/Microsoft Alliance. Ms. Fraiman holds a B.S. in biomedical engineering
from Vanderbilt University.
J.F. HENDRICKSON, JR. has served as Informix's Vice President, Customer
Services, since July 1992 and as its Lenexa (Kansas) Site General Manager since
February 1995. From 1991 until the time he joined Informix, Mr. Hendrickson was
Senior Vice President of Sales and Support at Image Business Systems, a
developer of document image management software for client/server systems. Mr.
Hendrickson holds a
117
<PAGE>
B.S. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University and an M.B.A. in
business and administration from the University of California, Los Angeles.
STEPHEN E. HILL has served as Informix's Vice President and General Manager,
Tools Business Unit since January 1998. Prior to assuming that position, Mr.
Hill served as Informix's Vice President, Advanced Technology since December
1995. Mr. Hill has been employed with Informix since 1985 and has served in
various strategic planning and marketing positions. Prior to joining Informix,
Mr. Hill held various product development positions at General Electric Company,
a diversified electronics and manufacturing company, Software Publishing
Corporation, a supplier of business productivity software, and Human Edge
Software, a business software company. Mr. Hill holds a B.S. in electrical
engineering from the University of Vermont.
DONALD W. HUNT has served as Informix's Vice President, North American
Sales, since August 5, 1998. Previous to August 1998, Mr. Hunt was Vice
President, North America End User Sales with Informix Software, Inc. Mr. Hunt
joined Informix in February 1997 as Vice President and General Manager
responsible for business sales in the Eastern United States and Canada. Prior to
joining Informix, Mr. Hunt was Vice President of the Americas Open Market from
March 1996 to February 1997, a provider of electronic commerce on the Internet,
and Sun Microsystems. At Open market, he held the position of Vice President of
the Americas. At Sun Microsystems, Inc., Mr. Hunt held the position of Director
of Independent Software Vendors for North America from February 1997 to March
1996. Mr. Hunt's career started at Digital Equipment Corporation, where he held
various sales and marketing management positions. Mr. Hunt holds a B.S. in
business administration from Salem State College, Salem, Massachusetts.
GARY LLOYD has served as Informix's Vice President, Legal and General
Counsel since January 1998 and as its Secretary since February 1998. From
November 1997 until January 1998, Mr. Lloyd served as Informix's interim General
Counsel. From March 1994 until October 1997, Mr. Lloyd was with the law firm of
Farella Braun & Martel L.L.P. From 1984 until February 1994, Mr. Lloyd served in
a variety of positions at the Securities and Exchange Commission, most recently
as its Assistant Director, Division of Enforcement. Mr. Lloyd holds a B.A. in
political science and English from Kent State University and a J.D. from Case
Western Reserve University.
LEONARD PALOMINO has served as Informix's Vice President and General
Manager, Datawarehousing since August 1998. From November 1996 to August 1998,
Mr. Palomino served as Informix's Vice President, Enterprise Services. Since
January 1991, Mr. Palomino has held various other positions at Informix,
including Vice President, Advanced Technology Group, Executive Director of
Client Services and Director of Client Services. Prior to Informix, Mr. Palomino
held various positions at Century Analysis, Inc., including Support Manager. Mr.
Palomino holds an A.S. in Computer Science from Spokane Falls College.
WESLEY RAFFEL has served as Informix's Vice President and General Manager,
Web and E-Commerce since August 1998. From September 1997 to August 1998, Mr.
Raffel served as Informix's Vice President, North American Field Operations.
From January 1996 to January 1997, Mr. Raffel served as Senior Vice President,
Sales and Marketing, and was the acting Chief Executive Officer of AssureNet
Pathways, Inc., a network security company. From October 1992 to September 1995,
Mr. Raffel was Vice President, Sales, of Global Village Communication, Inc., a
designer of integrated communications products for personal computers ("Global
Village"). Prior to joining Global Village, Mr. Raffel held a variety of
positions at 3Com, most recently as its Vice President, Intercontinental
Operations. Mr. Raffel holds a B.A. in general studies from Harvard University
and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
STEPHANIE P. SCHWARTZ has served as the Vice President, Controller since
June 1998. Prior to joining Informix, Ms. Schwartz served as Chief Financial
Officer of Atalla Corporation, a developer of secure on-
118
<PAGE>
line transaction automation systems and a subsidiary of Tandem Computers Inc.
("Tandem"), a position she had held since October 1996. Ms. Schwartz had
previously served in a variety of positions at Tandem, a developer of computer
and software systems, since August 1991, most recently as its Director, Business
Development, Asia Pacific Division. Ms. Schwartz holds a B.S. degree in
mathematics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an M.B.A. in
finance from Fairleigh Dickenson University.
MICHAEL A. STONEBRAKER has served as Informix's Vice President and Chief
Technology Officer since February 1996. Dr. Stonebraker co-founded Illustra and
served in a consulting capacity with Illustra as its Chief Technology Officer
until February 1996. Dr. Stonebraker is the professor emeritus of Electrical
Engineering and Computer Sciences at the University of California, Berkeley,
where he joined the faculty in 1971. Dr. Stonebraker holds a B.S. in electrical
engineering from Princeton University and an M.S. and Ph.D. in computer
information and control engineering from the University of Michigan.
F. STEVEN WEICK has served as Informix's Vice President of Research and
Development since October 1998, and is responsible for all core research and
development for Informix, including server development, datablade engineering,
client and system management development, tools, partner engineering and product
management. Mr. Weick joined Informix in 1997 as Vice President of Server
Development. Prior to joining Informix, Mr. Weick was, from 1995 to August 1997,
Vice President of Engineering for MapInfo Inc., a business mapping solutions
company. Mr. Weick led development activities for five years at Tandem
Computers, the last three as Vice President of Communications Hardware and
Software Products, and earlier led the Non-Stop SQL server, compiler and tools
development groups. Mr. Weick began his career at IBM in 1965 as a development
engineer; he held numerous positions at IBM, including: chief architect for
database products, consultant to the corporate technical committee, development
manager responsible for DB2, and program manager for compilers. Mr. Weick holds
a B.S. in mathematics from Purdue University and an M.B.A. from Pepperdine
University.
LESLIE G. DENEND has served as a member of Informix's Board of Directors
since December 1997. Mr. Denend served as President of Network Associates, Inc.,
a provider of network security and management software, that resulted from the
merger of McAfee Associates, Inc. and Network General Corporation ("Network
General") from December 1997 until May 1998. From June 1993 to December 1997,
Mr. Denend served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Network General.
He also served as Network General's Senior Vice President of Products from
February 1993 to June 1993. From November 1990 to December 1992, he was
President of Vitalink Communications, a manufacturer of networking products.
From January 1989 to October 1990, Mr. Denend served in a variety of positions
at 3Com, most recently as Executive Vice President for Product Operations. Mr.
Denend is also a director of Rational Software Inc., a provider of
component-based development software systems, and Proxim, Inc., a designer of
wireless local area networking products. Mr. Denend is a graduate of the United
States Air Force Academy and holds an M.B.A. and Ph.D. in economics, public
policy and business from Stanford University. Mr. Denend was also a Fulbright
Scholar in economics at Bonn University.
ALBERT F. KNORP, JR. has served as a member of Informix's Board of Directors
since 1984 and as its Assistant Secretary since 1985. Mr. Knorp is a general
partner in Seaport Ventures, L.P., a family partnership. Since November 1994,
Mr. Knorp has been of counsel to the law firm of Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich.
He had previously been a partner in the law firm of Lewis, Knorp, Walsh &
Kavalaris. Mr. Knorp holds a B.A. in social sciences from Stanford University
and an L.L.B. from Santa Clara University.
JAMES L. KOCH has served as a member of Informix's Board of Directors since
May 1991. Since July 1990, Mr. Koch has served in various positions at Santa
Clara University. Since February 1997, Mr. Koch has been its Director of the
Center for Science, Technology and Society and, since July 1990, a Professor of
Management and Corporate Strategy. In addition, from July 1990 to July 1996, Mr.
Koch served as Dean of the Leavey School of Business Administration at Santa
Clara University. Mr. Koch holds
119
<PAGE>
a B.A. in business administration from San Francisco State University and an
M.B.A. and Ph.D. in business administration from the University of California,
Los Angeles.
THOMAS A. MCDONNELL has served as a member of Informix's Board of Directors
since February 1988. Since 1971, Mr. McDonnell has served as Chief Executive
Officer of DST Systems, Inc. ("DST"), a transfer agent for mutual funds, stocks
and bonds, and since October 1984 as a director of DST. Mr. McDonnell is also
President of DST, a position he has held since 1973; Mr. McDonnell also served
as Treasurer of DST from 1973 to September 1995. From August 1983 to November
1995, Mr. McDonnell was Executive Vice President and a director of Kansas City
Southern Industries, Inc., a holding company and the former parent of DST. Mr.
McDonnell is also director of BHA Group, Inc., a manufacturer of pollution
control devices, Cerner Corporation, a provider of software and technology to
the health care industry, Computer Sciences Corporation, an information
technology company, Euronet Services, Inc., an operator of automatic teller
machines, Janus Capital Corporation, a registered investment advisor and
Nellcor-Puritan-Bennett Corporation, a medical device company. Mr. McDonnell
holds a B.S. and B.A. in accounting from Rockhust College and an M.B.A. from the
Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
GEORGE REYES has served as a member of Informix's Board of Directors since
July 1998. Since March 1988, Mr. Reyes has served in a variety of positions at
Sun Microsystems Inc., a supplier of enterprise network computing products, most
recently as its Vice President and Corporate Controller, a position Mr. Reyes
has held since April 1994. Mr. Reyes serves as a member of the Advisory Board of
the Leavey School of Business Administration at Santa Clara University. Mr.
Reyes holds a B.A. in accounting from the University of South Florida and an
M.B.A. in Finance from Santa Clara University.
CYRIL J. YANSOUNI has served as a member of Informix's Board of Directors
since May 1991. Since March 1991, Mr. Yansouni has been the Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Read-Rite Corporation, a
manufacturer of thin film magnetic recording heads. He also is a member of the
Advisory Board of both the Leavey School of Business Administration at Santa
Clara University and the San Jose State University School of Engineering. Mr.
Yansouni is a director of PeopleSoft, Inc., a provider of client/server business
software, Raychem Corporation, an international manufacturer and marketer of
products for electronics, industrial and telecommunications applications, and
ActivCard, a French company that develops authentication communication software.
Mr. Yansouni holds a B.S. degree in electrical and mechanical engineering from
the University of Louvain, Belgium and an M.S. degree in electrical engineering
from Stanford University. In addition, he attended the executive management
program at Stanford University.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
Informix has three standing committees, the Compensation Committee, the
Audit Committee and the Nominating Committee. The Audit Committee supervises and
reviews the audit and audit review programs and procedures of Informix's
independent auditors, Informix's internal accounting staff and the results of
internal auditing procedures. The Audit Committee also reviews the independence,
professional services, fees, plans and results of the independent auditors'
engagement, and recommends their retention or discharge to the Board. The
members of Informix's Audit Committee are Messrs. Koch, Knorp, McDonnell, Reyes
and Yansouni. The Audit Committee held six meetings during fiscal 1997. The
members of Informix's Nominating Committee are Messrs. Knorp, Koch, and
Yansouni. The Nominating Committee held two meetings during fiscal 1997.
The Compensation Committee will make recommendations to the Board concerning
the compensation of all officers of Informix and will administer Informix's
stock option plans. The Compensation Committee held six meetings during fiscal
1997.
120
<PAGE>
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Employee directors do not receive any additional compensation for serving as
a director. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, Informix paid each
non-employee director a quarterly fee of $2,000 and an additional fee of $1,000
for each Board meeting attended. In addition, members of the Audit and
Compensation Committees received $500 for each committee meeting attended.
Members of the nominating committee do not receive additional compensation for
committee meetings attended. For the year ending December 31, 1998, the outside
directors will continue to receive the same compensation as they received in
1997. Informix reimburses each member of Informix's Board of Directors, whether
or not an employee, for out-of-pocket expenses, including travel expenses,
incurred in connection with attending Board meetings. In addition, from time to
time, Informix invites the directors' spouses to accompany the directors to
board meetings, and, when invited, Informix also pays the travel expenses
incurred by the spouses. In 1997, these spousal travel expenses were less than
$10,000 per director.
Informix's 1989 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Director Plan")
provides for the grant of options to non-employee directors pursuant to an
automatic, nondiscretionary grant mechanism. Each non-employee director is
automatically granted an option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock upon
initial election to the Board of Directors and an additional option to purchase
15,000 shares upon re-election. Informix has a staggered board, with each
director serving for a three year term. Each such option is granted at the fair
market value of common stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the
Director Plan become exercisable over three years with one-third of the shares
vesting on each anniversary of the grant date. See "--Stock Plans--1989 Outside
Directors Stock Option Plan."
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining salaries,
incentives and other forms of compensation for directors, the Chief Executive
Officer, other officers and certain key employees of Informix. The Compensation
Committee also administers Informix's 1994 Stock Option and Award Plan and 1998
Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan and in this capacity approves employee stock
option grants and awards. The Compensation Committee consists of directors James
L. Koch, Thomas A. McDonnell and Cyril J. Yansouni. Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Informix, participates in all
discussions regarding the compensation of all officers of Informix but is
excluded from discussions regarding his own salary and incentive compensation.
No interlocking relationship exists between any member of Informix's
Compensation Committee and any member of any other company's board of directors
or compensation committee.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
The members of the Board of Directors, the executive officers of Informix,
and persons who hold more than 10% of Informix's outstanding common stock are
subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which require them to file reports with
respect to their ownership of Informix's common stock and their transactions in
such common stock. Based upon (i) the copies of Section 16(a) reports that
Informix received from such persons for their fiscal 1997 transactions in the
common stock and their common stock holdings and (ii) the written
representations received from one or more of such persons that no annual Form 5
reports were required to be filed by them for the 1997 fiscal year, Informix
believes that all reporting requirements under Section 16(a) for such fiscal
year were met in a timely manner by its executive officers, Board members, and
greater than 10% stockholders, except Thomas A. McDonnell, a member of the
Company's Board of Directors, inadvertently failed to file a report on Form 4 in
March 1997 for a transaction involving the exercise of an option under the 1994
Plan. Such transaction was reported on Mr. McDonnell's Form 5 for the year ended
December 31, 1998.
121
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth in summary form information concerning the
compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid for services rendered to Informix in
all capacities during each of fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995 by (i) Informix's
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, (ii) Informix's next four most
highly compensated executive officers whose salary and bonus for fiscal 1997
exceeded $100,000; and (iii) Informix's former President and Chief Executive
Officer (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
OPTIONS(#)
ANNUAL COMPENSATION (1) -------------
---------------------------- LONG-TERM
FISCAL COMPENSATION ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS AWARDS COMPENSATION
- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------ --------- --------- ------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CURRENT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.(2) 1997 $ 185,278 $ -- 1,500,000 $ 5,000(12)
Chairman, President and Chief Executive 1996 -- -- -- --
Officer 1995 -- -- -- --
J. F. Hendrickson(3) 1997 192,667 39,600 83,560(8) 5,977(13)
Vice President, Customer Services, and 1996 179,667 -- 30,000 6,013
Lenexa (Kansas) Site General Manager 1995 171,667 95,000 40,000 5,395
Stephen E. Hill(4) 1997 163,667 33,400 56,000(9) 2,533(14)
Vice President and General Manager, Tools 1996 154,569 -- 30,000 2,500
Business Unit 1995 145,667 85,000 40,000 2,429
Myron (Mike) Saranga(5) 1997 267,667 69,000 409,000(10) 43,886(15)
Senior Vice President, Product Management 1996 245,667 -- 100,000 45,875(10)
and Development 1995 229,333 168,000 130,000 5,525
Michael R. Stonebraker(6) 1997 209,200 42,400 135,000(11) 2,592(16)
Vice President and Chief Technology 1996 155,000 -- 75,000 1,620
Officer 1995 -- -- -- --
FORMER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Phillip E. White(7) 1997 277,083 -- -- 203,967(17)
Chairman, President and Chief Executive 1996 461,667 -- 200,000 4,484
Officer 1995 421,667 400,000 250,000 4,256
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------
(1) Other than the salary and bonus described herein, Informix did not pay any
executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table any fringe
benefits, perquisites or other compensation in excess of 10% of such
executive officer's salary and bonus during fiscal 1997, 1996 or 1995.
(2) Mr. Finocchio became Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in July
1997. Accordingly, he received no reportable income from Informix for fiscal
1996 or 1995. Mr. Finocchio's salary and other compensation for fiscal 1997
were determined in accordance with the provisions of his Employment
Agreement with Informix. See "--Employment Agreements and Change in Control
Arrangements." In January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Finocchio an additional
option under the 1994 Plan to acquire 500,000 shares of common stock,
subject to vesting in equal annual installments over four years.
(3) Mr. Hendrickson became Vice President, Customer Services, in July 1992 and
Lenexa (Kansas) Site General Manager in February 1995.
122
<PAGE>
(4) Mr. Hill was promoted to Vice President and General Manager, Tools Business
Unit in January 1998 from Vice President, Advanced Technology, a position he
had held since December 1995.
(5) Mr. Saranga became Senior Vice President, Product Management and Development
in May 1993 and resigned in October 1998.
(6) Dr. Stonebraker became Vice President and Chief Technology Officer in
February 1996. Accordingly, he received no reportable income for fiscal
1995.
(7) Mr. White resigned as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in
July 1997.
(8) Includes options to purchase 56,000 shares that Mr. Hendrickson elected to
reprice under Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. In
connection with such repricing, Mr. Hendrickson forfeited the right to
purchase 14,000 shares of common stock under options previously granted to
him. See "--Stock Option Repricing."
(9) Fiscal 1997 figure includes 56,000 shares that Mr. Hill elected to reprice
under Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. In connection with
such repricing, Mr. Hill forfeited the right to purchase 14,000 shares of
common stock under options previously granted to him. See "--Stock Option
Repricing." In January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Hill an additional option
under the 1994 Plan to acquire 100,000 shares of common stock, subject to
vesting in equal installments over four years.
(10) Fiscal 1997 figure includes 184,000 shares Mr. Saranga elected to reprice
under Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. In connection with
such repricing, Mr. Saranga forfeited the right to purchase 46,000 shares of
common stock under options previously granted to him. See "--Stock Option
Repricing." Fiscal 1997 figure also includes 100,000 option shares of which
will vest on December 31, 2000 if Mr. Saranga remains an employee of
Informix on such date. In January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Saranga the
right to receive 35,000 performance shares of common stock under the 1994
Plan during each of the next three years if certain financial milestones are
met as of January 1, 1999, 2000 and 2001. Such performance shares were
subject to a right of repurchase in favor of Informix which would have
lapsed if Mr. Saranga had remained an employee of Informix on January 1,
2001. Because Mr. Saranga resigned on October 2, 1998, he is no longer
entitled to receive such performance shares.
(11) Fiscal 1997 figure includes options to purchase 60,000 shares Dr.
Stonebraker elected to reprice under Informix's November 1997 option
repricing program. In connection with such repricing, Dr. Stonebraker
forfeited the right to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock under options
previously granted to him. See "--Stock Option Repricing."
(12) Represents reimbursement by Informix of $5,000 in legal fees incurred in
connection with the negotiation of Mr. Finocchio's Employment Agreement. See
"Employment Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements."
(13) Represents $4,050, $4,013 and $3,395 in group life insurance paid by
Informix in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively; and $1,927, $2,000 and
$2,000 in matching contributions under Informix's 401(k) plan paid by
Informix in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
(14) Represents $533, $500 and $429 in group life insurance paid by Informix in
fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and $2,000, $2,000 and $2,000 in
matching contributions under Informix's 401(k) Plan by Informix in fiscal
1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
(15) Represents $6,318, $4,050 and $3,525 in group life insurance paid by
Informix in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively; and $2,000, $2,000 and
$2,000 in matching contributions under Informix's 401(k) plan paid by
Informix in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Includes $35,568 and
$39,825 in forgiveness by Informix in fiscal 1997 and 1996, respectively, of
outstanding principal and accrued interest (such forgiveness amounts were
not grossed up to satisfy tax obligations) under a promissory note delivered
by Mr. Saranga to Informix. In June 1998, Informix forgave an additional
$34,749 in outstanding principal and accrued interest under such promissory
note. See "Informix Certain Transactions."
(16) Represents $2,592 and $1,620 in group life insurance paid by Informix in
fiscal 1997 and 1996, respectively.
(17) Represents $4,050, $2,484 and $2,256 in group life insurance paid by
Informix in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and $2,000, $2,000 and
$2,000 in matching contributions under Informix's 401(k) plan paid by
Informix in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Fiscal 1997 figure
also includes $197,917 paid by Informix in connection with Mr. White's
resignation pursuant to the terms of his Employment Agreement with Informix.
See "--Employment Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements" and
"Informix Certain Transactions."
123
<PAGE>
OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL YEAR 1997
The following table provides information relating to stock options awarded
to each of the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
---------------------------------------------------- VALUES AT ASSUMED
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK
SECURITIES TOTAL OPTIONS PRICE APPRECIATION
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO EXERCISE FOR OPTIONS TERM(1)
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES IN PRICE PER EXPIRATION ----------------------------
GRANTED FISCAL 1997(2) SHARE(3) DATE(4) 5% 10%
---------- --------------- ---------- ----------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CURRENT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Robert J. Finocchio, Jr. (5).. 1,500,000 11.44% $ 10.8125 07/22/07 $ 10,199,885 $ 25,848,511
J. F. Hendrickson, Jr. (6).... 27,500 0.21 9.0313 06/18/07 156,193 395,823
32,000 0.24 7.1563 04/18/05 99,665 234,842
24,000 0.18 7.1563 05/16/06 88,044 213,728
Stephen E. Hill (7)........... 50,000 0.38 9.0313 06/18/07 283,987 719,678
32,000 0.24 7.1563 04/18/05 99,665 234,842
24,000 0.18 7.1563 05/16/06 88,044 213,728
Myron (Mike) Saranga (8)...... 125,000 0.95 9.0313 06/18/07 709,967 1,799,196
100,000 0.76 9.5000 09/15/07 597,450 1,514,055
104,000 0.79 7.1563 04/18/05 323,911 763,235
80,000 0.61 7.1563 05/16/06 293,481 712,425
Michael R. Stonebraker (9).... 75,000 0.57 9.0313 06/18/07 425,980 1,079,517
60,000 0.46 7.1563 04/15/06 217,424 526,549
FORMER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Phillip E. White.............. -- -- -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
(1) Potential realizable value is based on the assumption that the common stock
of Informix appreciates at the annual rate shown (compounded annually) from
the date of grant until the expiration of the ten year option term. These
numbers are calculated based on the requirements promulgated by the
Commission and do not reflect Informix's estimate of future stock price
growth.
(2) Based on options to acquire 13,107,338 shares granted under the 1994 Plan,
the Director Plan and Informix's 1987 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan. Such
option grants include shares granted as a result of Informix's November 1997
option repricing program. See "--Stock Option Repricing." Unless otherwise
specified herein, all options granted to the Named Executive Officers were
under the 1994 Plan.
(3) Options were granted at an exercise price equal to not less than the fair
market value of Informix's common stock on the date of grant as reported on
the Nasdaq National Stock Market. The exercise price may be paid in cash,
check, by delivery of already-owned shares of Informix's common stock
subject to certain conditions or pursuant to a cashless exercise procedure
under which the optionee provides irrevocable instructions to a brokerage
firm to sell the purchased shares and to remit to Informix, out of the sale
proceeds, an amount equal to the exercise price plus all applicable
withholding taxes.
(4) Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares issuable upon exercise of options
granted under the 1994 Stock Plan become vested on the first anniversary of
the date of grant, and the remaining shares vest over three years at the
rate of 25% of the shares subject to option vesting on each successive
anniversary of the option grant date. Unless otherwise specified, options
granted to Named Executive Officers in fiscal 1997, including options
granted outside the 1994 Plan, are subject to Informix's standard four year
vesting schedule described above.
(5) The options to purchase 1,500,000 option shares of common stock granted to
Mr. Finocchio were issued in connection with his Employment Agreement with
Informix. See "--Executive Compensation" and "--Employment Agreements and
Change in Control Arrangements." Of the 1,500,000 option shares granted to
Mr. Finocchio, 1,000,000 were granted under the 1994 Plan and 500,000 were
granted under Informix's 1997 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan. In addition,
in January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Finocchio an additional option under
the 1994 Plan to acquire 500,000 shares of common stock, subject to vesting
in equal annual installments over four years.
124
<PAGE>
(6) Option grant figures includes 56,000 shares Mr. Hendrickson elected to
reprice under Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. In
connection with such repricing, Mr. Hendrickson forfeited the right to
purchase 14,000 shares of common stock under options previously granted to
him. See "--Stock Option Repricing."
(7) Option grant figures includes 56,000 shares Mr. Hill elected to reprice
under Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. In connection with
such repricing, Mr. Hill forfeited the right to purchase 14,000 shares of
common stock under options previously granted to him. See "--Stock Option
Repricing." In addition, in January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Hill an
additional option under the 1994 Plan to acquire 100,000 shares of common
stock, subject to vesting in equal annual installments over four years.
(8) Option grant figures includes 184,000 shares Mr. Saranga elected to reprice
under Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. In connection with
such repricing, Mr. Saranga forfeited the right to purchase 46,000 shares of
common stock under options previously granted to him. See "--Stock Option
Repricing." Mr. Saranga's option to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the
common stock of Informix granted in September 1997 under the 1994 Plan will
become vested on December 31, 2000 if Mr. Saranga remains an employee of
Informix on such date. In January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Saranga the
right to receive 35,000 performance shares of common stock under the 1994
Plan each of the next three years if certain financial milestones are met as
of January 1, 1999, 2000 and 2001. Such performance shares were subject to a
right of repurchase in favor of Informix which would have lapsed if Mr.
Saranga had remained an employee of Informix on January 1, 2001. Because Mr.
Saranga resigned on October 2, 1998, he is no longer entitled to receive
such performance shares.
(9) Option grant figures includes 60,000 shares Dr. Stonebraker elected to
reprice under Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. In
connection with such repricing, Dr. Stonebraker forfeited the right to
purchase 15,000 shares of common stock under options previously granted to
him. See "--Stock Option Repricing."
125
<PAGE>
AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES
IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table sets forth certain information regarding stock options
exercised during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 and held as of December
31, 1997 by the Named Executive Officers.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
SHARES DECEMBER 31, 1997 DECEMBER 31, 1997(2)
ACQUIRED OR VALUE --------------------------- -----------------------------
EXERCISED REALIZED(1) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CURRENT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.(3)...... -- $ -- -- 1,500,000 $ -- $ --
J. F. Hendrickson, Jr............ -- -- 320,000 93,500 132,800 --
Stephen E. Hill(4)............... 15,000 142,188 62,500 116,000 -- --
Myron (Mike) Saranga(5).......... -- -- 135,000 429,000 -- --
Michael R. Stonebraker........... -- -- -- 135,000 -- --
FORMER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Phillip E. White................. 50,000 63,810 1,245,000(6) -- 624,348(6) --
</TABLE>
- --------------------------
(1) Market value at the time of exercise less the applicable exercise price
(2) Based on the closing sales price of $4.750 of underlying securities as of
December 31, 1997 as reported on the Nasdaq National Stock Market minus the
exercise price.
(3) In January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Finocchio an additional option to
purchase 500,000 shares of common stock under the 1994 Plan, subject to
vesting in equal installments over four years.
(4) In January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Hill an additional option to purchase
100,000 shares of common stock under the 1994 Plan, subject to vesting in
equal installments over four years.
(5) In January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Saranga the right to receive 35,000
performance shares of common stock under the 1994 Plan each of the next
three years if certain financial milestones are met as of January 1, 1999,
2000 and 2001. Such performance shares were subject to a right of repurchase
in favor of Informix which would have lapsed if Mr. Saranga had remained an
employee of Informix on January 1, 2001. Because Mr. Saranga resigned on
October 2, 1998, he is no longer entitled to receive such performance
shares.
(6) All of Mr. White's options expired in February 1998. Prior to the expiration
of such options, Mr. White exercised options to acquire an aggregate of
540,000 shares of common stock in January and February 1998 with a realized
value of approximately $1,161,380.
STOCK OPTION REPRICING
In September 1997, Informix's Board of Directors authorized the repricing of
outstanding options to purchase common stock under Informix's stock option
plans. Employees, including executive officers, were eligible to participate
only if they remained actively employed at the effective date of the repricing
and were only permitted to exchange options outstanding prior to May 1, 1997.
The repricing/option exchange was effective November 21, 1997 (the "Repricing
Effective Date"). The repricing program offered eligible employees the
opportunity to exchange eligible outstanding options with exercise prices in
excess of the closing sales price of Informix's common stock on the Repricing
Effective Date for a new option with an exercise price equal to such price.
Other than the exercise price, each new option issued upon exchange has terms
substantially equivalent to the surrendered option, including with respect to
the number of shares, vesting terms and expiration. Options issued in connection
with the exchange may not be exercised for a period of one year from the
Repricing Effective Date, however. In addition, officers of Informix
participating in the option exchange were required to forfeit 20% of the shares
subject to each option being surrendered. The exercise price for repriced
options was $7.1563, the closing sales price of Informix's common stock on the
Repricing Effective Date.
126
<PAGE>
The following table provides information with respect to the November 1997
repricing for the Named Executive Officers and for other executive officers of
Informix who elected to reprice options. These are the only executive officers
of Informix who had their options repriced.
TEN-YEAR OPTION/SAR REPRICINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES LENGTH OF ORIGINAL
UNDERLYING MARKET PRICE OF OPTION TERM
OPTIONS/SARS STOCK AT TIME OF EXERCISE PRICE AT REMAINING AT DATE OF
REPRICED OR REPRICING OR TIME OF REPRICING NEW EXERCISE REPRICING OR
NAME DATE AMENDED(#)(1) AMENDMENT($) OR AMENDMENT($) PRICE($) AMENDMENT
- ------------------------------ -------- ------------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------ --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CURRENT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Robert F. Finocchio, -- -- -- -- -- --
Jr.(2)....................
Karen Blasing(3)............ 11/21/97 4,200 7.1563 18.250 7.1563 7.41
11/21/97 4,800 7.1563 18.250 7.1563 8.49
11/21/97 8,000 7.1563 18.250 7.1563 8.54
J.F. Hendrickson, Jr.(4).... 11/21/97 32,000 7.1563 18.250 7.1563 7.41
11/21/97 24,000 7.1563 24.125 7.1563 8.48
Stephen E. Hill(5).......... 11/21/97 32,000 7.1563 18.250 7.1563 7.41
11/21/97 24,000 7.1563 24.125 7.1563 8.48
Myron (Mike) Saranga(6)..... 11/21/97 104,000 7.1563 18.250 7.1563 7.41
11/21/97 80,000 7.1563 24.125 7.1563 8.48
Michael R. Stonebraker(7)... 11/21/97 60,000 7.1563 19.375 7.1563 8.40
FORMER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Philip E. White(8).......... -- -- -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
- --------------------------
(1) All options repriced by the Named Executive Officers and other executive
officers listed in the above table were granted under the 1994 Plan.
(2) Mr. Finocchio became Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in July
1997; consequently, he was not eligible to participate in the November 1997
repricing.
(3) Ms. Blasing became Informix's Vice President, Business Development Finance
in May 1998. Prior to that time, Ms. Blasing served as Informix's Corporate
Controller since June 1996 and as a Vice President of Informix since August
1997 before resigning from such positions in April 1998. Ms. Blasing
forfeited the right to purchase 4,250 shares of common stock as a result of
the repricing. At the time of the repricing, 4,600 of the 17,000 options Ms.
Blasing elected to reprice were vested.
(4) Mr. Hendrickson forfeited the right to purchase 14,000 shares of common
stock as a result of the repricing. At the time of repricing, 22,000 of the
56,000 options Mr. Hendrickson elected to reprice were vested.
(5) Mr. Hill forfeited the right to purchase 14,000 shares of common stock as a
result of the repricing. At the time of repricing, 22,000 of the 56,000
options Mr. Hill elected to reprice were vested.
(6) Mr. Saranga forfeited his right to purchase 46,000 shares of common stock as
a result of the repricing. At the time of the repricing, 72,000 of the
184,000 options Mr. Saranga elected to reprice were vested. Mr. Saranga
resigned from his position with Informix on October 2, 1998.
(7) Dr. Stonebraker forfeited his right to purchase 15,000 shares of common
stock as a result of the repricing. At the time of the repricing, 15,000 of
the 60,000 options Dr. Stonebraker elected to reprice were unvested.
(8) Mr. White resigned as Informix's Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer in July 1997; consequently he was not eligible to participate in the
November 1997 repricing.
In December 1997, Informix's Board of Directors authorized a second option
repricing to be effective January 9, 1998 (the "Second Repricing Effective
Date") based upon the closing sales price of Informix's common stock as of the
Second Repricing Effective Date ($5.094). Under the terms of the second
127
<PAGE>
repricing, each employee, other than officers and directors of Informix, could
elect to exchange any option outstanding as of May 1, 1997 for a new option with
an exercise price equal to the closing sales price on the Second Repricing
Effective Date. Options exchanged in the second repricing may not be exercised
for a period of one year from the Second Repricing Effective Date.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
On July 18, 1997, Informix entered into an at-will employment agreement with
Mr. Finocchio, Informix's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The
agreement provides for an annual base salary of $460,000, subject to annual
review concerning increases. Pursuant to the agreement, Informix granted Mr.
Finocchio an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock under the 1994
Plan at an exercise price per share of $10.8125, subject to vesting in equal
annual installments over four years and an option under Informix's 1997
Non-statutory Stock Option Plan to acquire an additional 500,000 shares of
common stock, also at an exercise price of $10.8125 and subject to vesting under
the same terms as the grant under the 1994 Plan. In the event of a merger or
change in control of Informix the exercisability of Mr. Finocchio's options will
accelerate so as to become fully vested. In January 1998, Informix granted Mr.
Finocchio an additional option under the 1994 Plan to acquire 500,000 shares of
common stock, subject to vesting in equal annual installments over four years.
On September 24, 1997, Informix entered into an at-will employment letter
with Jean-Yves F. Dexmier, Informix's Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, which provides for an annual base salary of $350,000 and an
annual cash bonus based on the achievement of individual and Company performance
objectives. In the event Mr. Dexmier is terminated without cause within the
first twelve months of his employment with Informix, he will be entitled to
receive severance in an amount equal to one year of base salary plus any bonus
he would have been entitled to receive under Informix's executive compensation
plan. If such termination occurs after Mr. Dexmier's first twelve months with
Informix, he shall be entitled to receive as severance an amount equal to six
months base salary. If there is a change in control of Informix within the first
twelve months Mr. Dexmier is employed with Informix, Mr. Dexmier will be
entitled to receive $1,000,000 less any stock option profit realized upon the
change in ownership. In connection with his employment, Informix granted Mr.
Dexmier an option under the 1994 Plan to acquire 500,000 shares of common stock
at an exercise price of $6.8125, subject to vesting in equal annual installments
over four years. In January 1998, Informix granted Mr. Dexmier an additional
option under the 1994 Plan to acquire 100,000 shares of common stock, subject to
equal annual installments over four years.
On September 18, 1997, Informix entered into an at-will employment letter
with Wesley Raffel, Informix's Vice President and General Manager, Web and
E-Commerce, which provides for an annual base salary of $250,000 and an annual
cash bonus based on the achievement of individual and Company performance
objectives. In the event of a change in the Chief Executive Officer or a change
in ownership of Informix where Mr. Raffel's employment with Informix is
terminated in connection with such event, Mr. Raffel will be entitled to receive
severance in an amount equal to one year of base salary. In connection with his
employment, Informix granted Mr. Raffel an option under the 1994 Plan to acquire
325,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.3438, subject to
vesting in equal annual installments over four years.
In October 1997, Informix entered into Change of Control Agreements (the
"Change of Control Agreements") with Messrs. Dexmier, Raffel and Saranga and Ms.
Blasing. The Change of Control Agreements, which are substantially similar for
each executive officer, provide that in the event a change in control of
Informix occurs, the exercisability of each executive officer's options will
accelerate so as to become fully vested.
In January 1998, Informix entered into an at-will employment letter with
Susan T. Daniel, Informix's Vice President, Human Resources, which provides for
an annual base salary of $230,000 and an annual
128
<PAGE>
cash bonus based on the achievement of individual and Company performance
objectives. Ms. Daniel will also receive $7,500 annually her first two years of
employment if she remains employed with Informix on the anniversary date of her
employment with Informix. In connection with her employment, Informix granted
Ms. Daniel an option under the 1994 Plan to acquire 200,000 shares of common
stock at a per share exercise price of $7.4688, subject to vesting in equal
annual installments over four years. In the event of a change of ownership of
Informix within Ms. Daniel's first two years of employment with Informix where
Ms. Daniel's employment is terminated within 90 days of the change of control
event other than for cause, she will be entitled to receive severance in an
amount equal to one (1) year base salary. If a change of control in the
ownership of Informix occurs within Ms. Daniel's first six months with Informix,
the exercisability of her options will accelerate as to two years additional
vesting. If such change of control takes place after such six month period, the
exercisability of Ms. Daniel's options will accelerate so as to become fully
vested.
In January 1998, Informix entered into an at-will employment letter with
Gary Lloyd, Informix's Vice President, Legal, General Counsel and Secretary,
which provides for an annual base salary of $200,000 and an annual cash bonus
based on the achievement of individual and Company performance objectives. In
connection with his employment, Informix granted Mr. Lloyd an option under the
1994 Plan to acquire 150,000 shares of common stock at a per share exercise
price of $5.7500, subject to vesting in equal installments over four years. If a
change of control in the ownership of Informix occurs within Mr. Lloyd's first
six months with Informix, the exercisability of his options will accelerate as
to two years additional vesting. If such change of control takes place after
such six month period, the exercisability of Mr. Lloyd's options will accelerate
so as to become fully vested.
On March 18, 1998, Informix entered into an at-will employment letter with
Diane L. Fraiman, Informix's Vice President, Corporate Marketing, which provides
for an annual base salary of $250,000 and an annual cash bonus based on the
achievement of individual and Company performance objectives. Pursuant to her
employment letter, Ms. Fraiman received a $135,000 signing bonus, which Ms.
Fraiman will be required to repay in full if she terminates her employment with
Informix prior to the first anniversary of her commencement date. Ms. Fraiman
will be required to repay half that amount if she terminates her employment
after the first anniversary date but prior to the second anniversary date. In
connection with her employment with Informix, Informix granted Ms. Fraiman
option to acquire 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $8.531
per share, subject to vesting in equal annual installments over four years. If
there is a change in control of Informix within the first six months after the
date of Ms. Fraiman's employment letter, the vesting of Ms. Fraiman's options
will accelerate as to two year's additional vesting. If such change of control
occurs after such six month anniversary, Ms. Fraiman's options will accelerate
so as to become fully vested.
Other than the employment arrangements described above, Informix does not
have employment agreements with any other current executive officer or director.
In connection with Philip E. White's resignation as Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer in July 1997, and pursuant to his employment agreement
with Informix, Informix was obligated to pay Mr. White six months salary at a
rate of $39,583.34 per month from the time of his resignation.
Informix has entered into severance arrangements with additional former
executive officers of Informix. See "Certain Transactions."
Informix has also adopted a Rights Agreement, commonly referred to as a
poison pill. See "Description of Informix Capital Stock--Antitakeover Effects of
Provisions of Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws; Rights Agreement."
129
<PAGE>
LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION MATTERS
Informix has adopted provisions in its Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation that eliminate to the fullest extent permissible under Delaware
law the liability of its directors to Informix for monetary damages. Such
limitation of liability does not affect the availability of equitable remedies
such as injunctive relief or rescission. Informix's Bylaws provide that Informix
shall indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law, including in circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise
discretionary under Delaware law. Informix has entered into indemnification
agreements with its officers and directors containing provisions which may
require Informix, among other things, to indemnify the officers and directors
against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service
as directors or officers (other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct
of a culpable nature), and to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any
proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. See "Business of
Informix--Legal Proceedings."
STOCK PLANS
1994 STOCK OPTION AND AWARD PLAN
Informix's 1994 Stock Option and Award Plan, as amended (the "1994 Plan"),
provides for the grant to employees of either options to purchase shares of
common stock or the award of performance shares of common stock to be paid to
employees upon the achievement of certain performance goals set for such
employees. Options granted under the 1994 Plan may be either "incentive stock
options" as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code"), or nonqualified stock options. Stock options or
performance awards granted under the 1994 Plan shall be referred to herein as
"Awards." The 1994 Plan became effective in March 1994. The 1994 Plan replaced
Informix's 1986 Stock Option Plan for Employees (the "Prior Plan"). Options
previously issued under the Prior Plan continue to be exercisable according to
their terms. Unless terminated sooner, without contrary action by Informix's
stockholders, the 1994 Plan will terminate automatically in March 2004. A total
of 16,000,000 shares of common stock had been reserved for issuance under the
1994 Plan at September 28, 1997, with a maximum of 800,000 of those shares
available for award as performance shares.
The 1994 Plan may be administered by a committee of the Board of Directors
(the "Committee"), which shall be comprised solely of directors who are both
"disinterested persons" under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and "outside
directors" under Section 162(m) of the Code. The 1994 Plan is currently
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
Committee has the power, among other things, to determine which employees shall
be granted Awards, to prescribe the terms and conditions of the Awards and to
interpret the 1994 Plan and Awards. In addition, the Committee has the authority
to amend, suspend or terminate the 1994 Plan, provided that no such action may
adversely affect any Award previously granted under the 1994 Plan. In addition,
in May 1997, Informix's stockholders approved an increase by 8,000,000 shares in
the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1994 Plan, provided that
options to acquire such additional shares may not be repriced without
stockholder approval.
Options granted under the 1994 Plan are not generally transferable by the
optionee, and each option is generally exercisable during the lifetime of the
optionee only by such optionee. Options granted under the 1994 Plan must
generally be exercised within three months of the termination of optionee's
status as an employee of Informix or within 12 months after such employee's
termination by death or disability, but in no event later than the expiration of
ten-years from the date of grant of such option. The Committee has the
discretion to extend or accelerate the exercisability of options following a
termination of the optionee's employment but in no event for more than ten years
after the date of grant of such option. The exercise price of nonstatutory stock
options granted under the 1994 Plan must at least be equal to the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of all
incentive stock options granted under the 1994 Plan must generally be at least
equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the
130
<PAGE>
date of grant. In the event of certain transactions specified in Section 424(d)
of the Code where Informix is assuming stock options granted to an employee by
such employee's previous employer, the Committee may grant substitute options
under the 1994 Plan with an exercise price less than fair market value. The term
of all other options granted under the 1994 Plan may not exceed ten years.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any participant who owns stock
possessing more than ten percent of the voting power of all classes of
Informix's outstanding capital stock, the exercise price of any incentive stock
option granted must equal at least 110% of the fair market value on the grant
date and the term of such incentive stock option must not exceed five years.
No employee shall be granted in any fiscal year options to purchase more
than 500,000 shares, except that new employees and newly appointed executive
officers may be granted options under the 1994 Plan to purchase up to 1,000,000
shares in the fiscal year of their hire or appointment. Generally, options
granted under the 1994 Plan are not exercisable until one year after the date of
grant, with 25% vesting on the first year anniversary and 25% vesting on the
second, third and fourth anniversaries of the option grant date. Options which
are unexercisable at the time of an employee's death or disability but which
would otherwise become exercisable within one year of such date will
automatically accelerate to the date of the employee's death or disability. The
consideration to be paid upon exercise of an option may be cash, other shares
(with certain restrictions) or such other form of consideration as may be
acceptable to the Committee.
No employee shall receive more than 200,000 shares pursuant to a performance
award in any fiscal year. In all cases, the performance period relating to a
performance award grant shall exceed six months in duration. Such performance
may be qualified as "performance based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the
Code in the Committee's discretion and may be based on the achievement of goals
relating to Company revenue, return on stockholders' equity and/or earnings per
share. Shares of common stock of Informix will be paid out to employees based on
his or her achievement of certain performance milestones. The 1994 Plan provides
that in the event of a merger or consolidation of Informix with or into another
corporation, a sale of substantially all of Informix's assets or certain other
changes in control of Informix, the number of shares purchasable under options
granted under the 1994 Plan and the corresponding exercise price will be
adjusted in connection with such corporate restructuring and that, with regard
to the performance shares outstanding, the Committee shall determine the
appropriate actions to prevent the dilution or diminishment of the awards.
As of September 30, 1998, 35,059,024 shares of common stock had been issued
upon exercise of options outstanding under the Prior Plan and 155,148 shares of
common stock had been issued upon exercise of options outstanding under the 1994
Plan. Options to purchase 1,889,934 shares of common stock at a weighted average
exercise price of $5.337 were outstanding under the Prior Plan, and options to
purchase 12,201,527 shares of common stock at a weighted average exercise price
of $7.2716 were outstanding under the 1994 Plan (giving effect to an option
repricings effected in November 1997 (and to the second option repricing in
January 1998). Additionally, 105,000 shares of common stock have been awarded in
connection with performance shares awards under the 1994 Plan but have not yet
been issued. Moreover, as of September 30, 1998, options to purchase 487,653
shares of common stock of Informix assumed in connection with the acquisition of
Illustra were outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $.8186 and
are exercisable according to their terms (giving effect to an option repricings
effected in November 1997 and January 1998). As of September 30, 1998, 3,643,325
shares remained available for issuance under the 1994 Plan, including 695,000
shares available for issuance as performance shares.
1998 NON-STATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN
Informix's 1998 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (the "1998 Plan") was
approved by the Board of Directors in July 1998. As of September 30, 1998, no
shares had been issued upon exercise of stock options granted under the 1998
Plan. Options to purchase 2,699,699 shares of common stock at a weighted average
exercise price of $5.3399 were outstanding under the 1998 Plan.
131
<PAGE>
The 1998 Plan provides for the grant of nonstatutory stock options to
employees and consultants; provided that options may not be granted to officers
and directors under the 1998 Plan. A total of 5,500,000 shares of common stock
are currently reserved for issuance pursuant to the 1998 Plan. Unless terminated
sooner, the 1998 Plan will terminate automatically in July 2008.
The 1998 Plan may be administered by the Board of Directors or a committee
of the Board (as applicable, the "Committee"). The 1998 Plan is currently
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
Committee has the power to determine the terms of the options granted, including
the exercise price of the option, the number of shares subject to each option,
the exercisability thereof, and the form of consideration payable upon such
exercise. In addition, the Committee has the authority to amend, suspend or
terminate the 1998 Plan, provided that no such action may affect any share of
common stock previously issued and sold or any option previously granted under
the 1998 Plan.
Options granted under the 1998 Plan are generally not transferable by the
optionee, and each option is exercisable during the lifetime of the optionee
only by such optionee. Options granted under the 1998 Plan must generally be
exercised within three months after the end of optionee's status as an employee
or consultant of Informix, or within twelve months after such optionee's
termination by death or disability, but in no event later than the expiration of
the option's ten year term.
The exercise price of options granted under the 1998 Plan is determined by
the Administrator. The term for options granted under the 1998 Plan is ten
years.
1997 NON-STATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN
Informix's 1997 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan") was
approved by the Board of Directors in July, 1997. As of September 30, 1998, no
shares had been issued upon exercise of stock options granted under the 1997
Plan, and 500,000 shares were subject to outstanding options. Such options were
granted to Robert J. Finocchio, Informix's Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, in connection with his July 1997 employment agreement. See
"--Employment Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements."
The 1997 Plan provides for the grant of nonstatutory stock options to
employees and consultants; provided that options may only be granted to officers
and directors under the 1997 Plan as an inducement essential to their entering
into an employment contract with Informix. A total of 500,000 shares of common
stock are currently reserved for issuance pursuant to the 1997 Plan. Unless
terminated sooner, the 1997 Plan will terminate automatically in July 2007.
The 1997 Plan may be administered by the Board of Directors or a committee
of the Board (as applicable, the "Administrator"). The Administrator has the
power to determine the terms of the options granted, including the exercise
price of the option, the number of shares subject to each option, the
exercisability thereof, and the form of consideration payable upon such
exercise. In addition, the Administrator has the authority to amend, suspend or
terminate the 1997 Plan, provided that no such action may affect any share of
common stock previously issued and sold or any option previously granted under
the 1997 Plan.
Options granted under the 1997 Plan are generally not transferable by the
optionee, and each option is exercisable during the lifetime of the optionee
only by such optionee. Options granted under the 1997 Plan must generally be
exercised within three months after the end of optionee's status as an employee,
director or consultant of Informix if such termination is for cause, or within
twelve months after such optionee's termination by death, disability or for any
termination other than for cause, but in no event later than the expiration of
the option's ten year term.
The exercise price of options granted under the 1997 Plan is determined by
the Administrator. The term for options granted under the 1997 Plan is ten
years.
132
<PAGE>
The 1997 Plan provides that in the event of a merger of Informix with or
into another corporation, or a sale of substantially all of Informix's assets,
each option shall be assumed or an equivalent option substituted for by the
successor corporation. If the outstanding options are not assumed or substituted
for by the successor corporation, the Administrator shall provide for the
optionee to have the right to exercise the option as to all of the optioned
stock, including shares as to which it would not otherwise be exercisable. If
the Administrator makes an option exercisable in full in the event of a merger
or sale of assets, the Administrator shall notify the optionee that the option
shall be fully exercisable for a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of
such notice, and the option will terminate upon the expiration of such period.
The 1997 Plan provides that in the event of a change of control of Informix,
the acceleration of vesting terms contained in the optionee's employment
agreement shall govern.
1997 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Informix's 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "1997 Purchase Plan")
became effective in July 1997 and shall continue in effect until terminated by
Informix. The 1997 Purchase Plan replaces the Corporation's Employee Stock
Purchase Plan which expired on July 1, 1997. A total of 4,000,000 shares of
common stock has been reserved for issuance under the 1997 Purchase Plan,
2,837,959 shares remained available for issuance under the 1997 Purchase Plan at
September 30, 1998. The 1997 Purchase Plan, which is intended to qualify under
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, has four three-month offering periods
each year beginning on the first trading day on or after July 1, October 1,
January 1 and April 1. The 1997 Purchase Plan is administered by the Board of
Directors or by a committee appointed by the Board (the "Committee"). The 1997
Purchase Plan is currently administered by the Compensation Committee. Employees
are eligible to participate if they are customarily employed by Informix for
more than 20 hours per week and more than five months during a calendar year and
have completed a two year service period with Informix. Moreover, employees are
not eligible to participate in the 1997 Purchase Plan if they possess or have
the right to acquire five percent (5%) or more of the voting stock of Informix
or any of its subsidiaries. The 1997 Purchase Plan permits participants to
purchase common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15% of an employee's
compensation, including commissions, overtime and bonuses. The price of common
stock purchased under the 1997 Purchase Plan is 85% of the lower of the fair
market value of the common stock at the beginning or at the end of each offering
period as reported on the Nasdaq National Stock Market for the day in question.
Employees may not purchase more than 20,000 shares of common stock during any
three month offering period. In addition, employees will not be granted the
right to purchase shares of common stock under the 1997 Purchase Plan at a rate
which accrues in excess of $25,000 of fair market value at the applicable grant
dates of such shares. Employees may end participation at any time during an
offering period, and they will be paid their payroll deductions to date.
Participation ends automatically upon termination of employment with Informix.
Rights granted under the 1997 Purchase Plan are not transferable by a
participant other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or as
otherwise provided under the 1997 Purchase Plan. The 1997 Purchase Plan provides
that, in the event of a merger of Informix with or into another corporation or a
sale of substantially all of Informix's assets, the Board of Directors may make
such adjustment, if any, as it deems appropriate in the number, kind and
purchase price of the shares available for purchase under the 1997 Purchase Plan
and in the maximum number of shares subject to any option under the 1997
Purchase Plan. The Board of Directors has the authority to amend or terminate
the 1997 Purchase Plan. If the 1997 Purchase Plan is terminated, the Board may
elect to terminate all outstanding options either immediately or upon completion
of the purchase of shares on the next purchase date or may elect to permit
options to expire in accordance with their terms.
133
<PAGE>
1989 OUTSIDE DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN
Outside directors are entitled to participate in the 1989 Outside Directors
Stock Option Plan, as amended, (the "Director Plan"). The Director Plan has a
term of 20 years, unless terminated sooner by the Board. A total of 1,600,000
shares of common stock has been reserved for issuance under the Director Plan.
The Director Plan provides for the automatic grant of 15,000 shares of common
stock to each eligible outside director on the date such person first is elected
as a director. In addition, outside directors shall automatically be granted an
option to purchase 15,000 shares at each time such outside director is re-
elected to the Board of Directors. Each option granted under the Director Plan
shall have a term of ten years and the shares subject to the option shall vest
over three years with one-third of the shares vesting on each of the first three
anniversaries of the grant date. The exercise prices of the options granted
under the Director Plan shall be 100% of the fair market value per share of the
common stock, generally determined with reference to the closing price of the
common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market on the date of grant. In
the event of a change of control of Informix, each option granted under the
Director Plan shall become fully vested and exercisable. Options granted under
the Director Plan must be exercised within one month of the end of the
optionee's tenure as a director of Informix, or within 12 months after such
director's termination by death or disability, but in no event later than the
expiration of the option's ten-year term. No option granted under the Director
Plan is transferable by the optionee other than by will or the laws of descent
and distribution, and each option is exercisable, during the lifetime of the
optionee, only by such optionee.
401(k) PLAN
Informix has adopted a tax-qualified employee savings and retirement plan
(the "401(k) Plan"). All U.S. employees except temporary employees, leased
employees, non-resident alien employees with no U.S.-source income, union
employees and employees of an affiliated employer not authorized to participate
in the 401(k) Plan are eligible to participate as of their date of hire.
Eligible employees may elect to defer between one percent (1%) and fifteen
percent (15%) of their compensation in the 401(k) Plan, subject to the
statutorily prescribed annual limit. Informix may make matching contributions on
behalf of all participants in the 401(k) Plan in an amount determined by
Informix's Board of Directors. The matching contribution for the year ended
December 31, 1997 was 50% of employee deferrals, up to a maximum of $2,000 per
employee. Informix may also make additional discretionary profit sharing
contributions in such amounts as determined by the Board of Directors, subject
to statutory limitations on contributions made by employees and employers under
such plans. Matching contributions are subject to a vesting schedule; all other
contributions are at all times fully vested. Employees may borrow from the
401(k) Plan, and may request withdrawal from their account in the case of
hardship or on attainment of age 59 1/2. The 401(k) Plan is intended to qualify
under Sections 401 and 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, so
that contributions by employees or by Informix to the 401(k) Plan, and income
earned on plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from
the 401(k) Plan, and so that contributions by Informix, if any, will be
deductible by Informix when made. The trustee under the 401(k) Plan, at the
direction of each participant, invests the assets of the 401(k) Plan in any of a
number of investment options.
134
<PAGE>
INFORMIX STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of Informix's outstanding equity securities as of September 30, 1998,
after giving effect to the conversion of all of Informix's Series B Preferred
Stock into 12,500,000 shares of common stock based upon an assumed conversion
price of $4.00 per share and the Warrants to acquire an aggregate of 2,700,000
shares of common stock and the assumed grant and exercise of the Shemano Warrant
to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock of Informix for (i) each person or
entity who is known by Informix to own beneficially 5% or more of Informix's
outstanding common stock; (ii) each director of Informix; (iii) each of the
Named Executive Officers; and (iv) all current directors and executive officers
of Informix as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
BENEFICIALLY OWNED
-------------------------
PERCENT OF
NAME AND ADDRESS OF STOCKHOLDER(1) NUMBER CLASS(2)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
COMMON STOCK
5% STOCKHOLDERS
Fletcher International Limited(3) .................................................... 13,674,500 7.6%
c/o Midland Bank Trust Corporation (Cayman) Limited
P.O. Box 1109, Mary Street
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands
British West Indies
DIRECTORS AND CURRENT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Leslie G. Denend(4)................................................................... -- --
Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.(5)........................................................... 378,849 *
J.F. Hendrickson, Jr.(6).............................................................. 374,584 *
Stephen E. Hill(7).................................................................... 126,062 *
Albert F. Knorp, Jr.(8)............................................................... 159,268 *
James L. Koch(9)...................................................................... 94,400 *
Thomas A. McDonnell(10)............................................................... 150,000 *
George Reyes(11)...................................................................... -- --
Myron (Mike) Saranga(12).............................................................. 306,010 *
Michael R. Stonebraker(13)............................................................ 539,898 *
Cyril J. Yansouni(14)................................................................. 45,000 *
All current directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)(15).............. 2,495,608 *
FORMER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Phillip E. White(16).................................................................. 12,819 *
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------
* Less than 1%.
(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each listed stockholder, other
than the Selling Stockholders, is c/o Informix Corporation, 4100 Bohannon
Drive, Menlo Park, California 94025. Except as otherwise indicated, and
subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of
common stock held by them.
(2) For figures related to holdings of common stock, applicable percentage
ownership is based on 181,051,266 shares of common stock outstanding as of
September 30, 1998 (including the February 1998 issuance of 12,769,908
shares of common stock issued to Fletcher upon conversion of 220,000 shares
of Series A-1 Preferred as described more fully in footnote 3), together
with applicable options or warrants for such stockholder. Such outstanding
common stock share figure assumes the conversion of the remaining
outstanding Series B Preferred into 8,740,520 shares of common stock based
on an assumed conversion price of $4.00 per share. Beneficial ownership is
determined in accordance with the rules of the Commission and generally
includes voting or investment power with respect to securities, subject to
community property laws, where applicable. Shares of common stock or Series
A-1 Preferred subject to options or warrants that are presently exercisable
or exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998 are deemed to be
beneficially owned by the person holding such options or warrants for the
purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person but are not
treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of any
135
<PAGE>
other person. To the extent that any shares are issued upon exercise of
options, warrants or other rights to acquire Informix's capital stock that
are presently outstanding or granted in the future or reserved for future
issuance under Informix's stock plans, there will be further dilution to new
public investors.
(3) Includes 12,769,208 shares of common stock issued upon conversion of 220,000
shares of Series A-1 Preferred on February 13, 1998 and 904,592 shares of
common stock currently issuable upon conversion of shares of Series A-1
Preferred, which are currently issuable upon exercise of the Series A-1
Warrant. As described below, the number of shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise and conversion of the Series A-1 Warrant increased effective
April 1, 1998. Fletcher is the original purchaser of 160,000 shares of
Informix's Series A Preferred and the Series A Warrant to purchase an
additional 140,000 shares of Series A Preferred. Fletcher exchanged such
Series A Preferred for a like number of shares of Series A-1 Preferred and
exchanged the Series A Warrant for the Series A-1 Warrant to purchase a like
number of shares of Series A-1 Preferred. The Series A-1 Preferred is
convertible into common stock of Informix based on a conversion rate that is
dependent upon the trading price of Informix's common stock as reported on
The Nasdaq Stock Market prior to the time of such conversion. As indicated
above, on February 13, 1998, Fletcher exercised the Series A-1 Warrant with
respect to 60,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred and simultaneously
converted 220,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred into 12,769,908 shares of
common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreement, the
maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the
Series A-1 Preferred (including upon exercise and conversion of the Series
A-1 Warrant) was 13,674,500 as of March 31, 1998; however, on January 26,
1998, pursuant to the terms of the original financing agreements, Fletcher
gave Informix a notice designating 16,674,500 shares as the maximum number
of shares of common stock to be issuable upon conversion of the Series A-1
Preferred on or after April 1, 1998. Fletcher must give Informix another
notice to increase the maximum number of conversion shares further. The
Series A-1 Preferred shares are non-voting securities and holders of Series
A-1 Preferred are not generally entitled to vote on corporate matters, prior
to the conversion of such shares into common stock.
(4) Mr. Denend is a member of Informix's Board of Directors.
(5) Includes 375,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding options which are presently exercisable or will become
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998. Also includes 100 shares
of common stock held by Mr. Finocchio's minor son. Mr. Finocchio is
Informix's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. See "Informix
Management-- Employment Agreements and Control Arrangements."
(6) Includes 372,875 shares of common stock held issuable upon exercise of
outstanding options which are presently exercisable or will become
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998. Mr. Hendrickson is
Informix's Vice President, Customer Services, and Lenexa (Kansas) Site
General Manager. Mr. Hendrickson forfeited options to acquire 14,000 shares
of common stock in connection with Informix's November 1997 option repricing
program. See "Executive Compensation--Stock Option Repricing."
(7) Includes 121,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding options which are presently exercisable or will become
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998. Mr. Hill is Informix's
Vice President and General Manager, Tools Business Unit. Mr. Hill forfeited
options to acquire 14,000 shares of common stock in connection with
Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. See "Informix
Management--Executive Compensation; Stock Option Repricing."
(8) Includes 30,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
options which are presently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60
days of September 30, 1998. Also includes 105,728 shares of common stock
held by Seaport Ventures, L.P., of which Mr. Knorp is a general partner. Mr.
Knorp is a member of Informix's Board of Directors.
(9) Includes 92,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
options which are presently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60
days of September 30, 1998. Mr. Koch is a member of Informix's Board of
Directors.
(10) Includes 95,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding options which are presently exercisable or will become
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998. Mr. McDonnell is a member
of Informix's Board of Directors.
(11) Mr. Reyes is a member of Informix's Board of Directors and Audit Committee.
(12) Includes 304,250 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding options which are presently exercisable or will become
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998. Mr. Saranga was formerly
Informix's Senior Vice President, Product Management and Development. Mr.
Saranga forfeited options to acquire 46,000 shares of common stock in
connection with Informix's November 1997 option repricing program. See
"Informix Management--Executive Compensation; Option Repricing." Mr. Saranga
resigned on October 2, 1998 and has 3 months to exercise such options.
(13) Includes 48,750 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding options which are presently exercisable or will become
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998. Also includes 121,882
shares of common stock held by Dr. Stonebraker's minor children and 533
shares of common stock held by Dr. Stonebraker as trustee for the Michael
Stonebraker Pension Plan. Dr. Stonebraker is Informix's Vice President and
Chief Technology Officer. Dr. Stonebraker forfeited options to acquire
15,000 shares of common stock in connection with Informix's November 1997
option repricing program. See "Informix Management--Executive Compensation;
Stock Option Repricing."
(14) Includes 45,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding options which are presently exercisable or will become
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998. Mr. Yansouni is a member
of Informix's Board of Directors.
(15) Includes 1,787,925 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding options which are presently exercisable or will become
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 1998.
(16) Mr. White resigned as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and
Chief Executive Officer in July 1997.
136
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
In June 1993, Informix made a loan in the principal amount of $150,000 to
Myron (Mike) Saranga, Informix's former Senior Vice President, Product
Management and Development, in connection with his accepting employment by
Informix. The loan was originally due and payable in full on the earliest of
June 2, 1995, the date Mr. Saranga sold certain residential real property
located in Connecticut, or the date Mr. Saranga's employment with Informix was
terminated. In June 1995, Mr. Saranga and Informix amended the loan to increase
the interest rate of 3.56% per annum to 6.55% per annum and to provide that
$30,000 of principal, and accrued interest, would be forgiven on June 2, 1996
and each anniversary thereafter until the loan is no longer outstanding,
provided that Mr. Saranga remains an employee of Informix. The loan provided
that the full amount of unpaid principal and accrued interest will become
immediately due and payable on the date Mr. Saranga's employment with Informix
is terminated for any reason. Mr. Saranga resigned on October 2, 1998. In June
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively, Informix forgave $34,749, $35,568 and $39,825
of principal and interest loan under the promissory note, respectively (such
forgiveness amounts were not grossed up to satisfy tax obligations). As of March
31, 1998, outstanding principal under the note totaled $60,000. It is
anticipated that Mr. Saranga will repay the entire outstanding principal and
accrued interest.
Informix has entered into employment and change of control agreements with
certain executive officers of Informix. See "Informix Management--Employment
Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements."
In connection with Frank J. Bergandi's resignation as Vice President, North
American Sales, in December 1995, Informix entered into a Separation Agreement
with Mr. Bergandi whereby Informix agreed to pay Mr. Bergandi six months salary
at a rate of $15,833.33 per month during a six month transition period. Informix
also agreed that options to purchase up to an aggregate of 95,000 shares of
common stock of Informix held by Mr. Bergandi would continue to vest during such
transition period.
In April 1997, Informix entered into Separation Agreements with Ronald M.
Alvarez, Informix's former Vice President, American Sales, and Edwin C. Winder,
Informix's former Vice President, Japan Operations, in connection with their
resignations as executive officers of Informix. Under the terms of their
respective Separation Agreements, Mr. Alvarez and Mr. Winder received payments
for six months additional salary from the time of their resignations at the rate
of $17,083.33 and $18,250.00 per month, respectively. In addition, Mr. Alvarez
received a bonus in the amount of $7,686.00 for his services during Informix's
first fiscal quarter of 1997. As part of his Separation Agreement, options to
purchase 11,250 shares of common stock of Informix held by Mr. Alvarez continued
to vest during the six months subsequent to his resignation date. Informix also
agreed to pay both Mr. Alvarez and Mr. Winder additional fees for outplacement
services and legal fees incurred in connection with the negotiation of their
respective Separation Agreements.
In connection with D. Kenneth Coulter's resignation as Executive Vice
President, Worldwide Field Operations in July 1997, and pursuant to an
Employment Agreement Informix previously entered with Mr. Coulter, Informix paid
Mr. Coulter an aggregate of $106,954 over the five month period ended December
31, 1997.
In connection with Richard H. Williams' resignation as Senior Vice
President, Business Units, in September 1996, Informix entered into a Separation
Agreement with Mr. Williams whereby Informix agreed to pay Mr. Williams $132,500
in a lump sum payment, which represented six months of Mr. Williams' base
salary. Moreover, Informix agreed that certain additional unvested restricted
stock to purchase up to 77,283 shares of common stock of Informix held by Mr.
Williams would continue to vest during the five month period following his
resignation from Informix. Informix also agreed to pay Mr. Williams $1,000 for
each day that he performed consulting services for Informix during the five
months following his resignation; however, Mr. Williams did not perform any
consulting services for Informix during such period. In addition, under the
terms of a restricted stock purchase agreement Informix
137
<PAGE>
previously entered into with Mr. Williams, in connection with Mr. Williams'
resignation, Informix purchased 128,804 shares of restricted stock that had been
held by Mr. Williams for $24,999.81.
In connection with Richard Blass' resignation as Vice President, Americas
Finance, in November 1996, Informix entered into a Separation Agreement with Mr.
Blass whereby it agreed to pay Mr. Blass five and one-half months salary at a
rate of $11,500.00 per month following his resignation. Informix also agreed to
pay Mr. Blass an additional six months salary, at the same rate of $11,500.00
per month, either in a lump sum payment or over six months following such five
and one-half month transition period. Under his Separation Agreement, Informix
also agreed to pay Mr. Blass up to $5,000 for outplacement services.
In January 1997, Informix made a loan in the principal amount of $150,000 to
Alan Henricks, Informix's former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, at an interest rate of seven percent (7.0%) per annum in connection
with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of the loan,
$50,000 of principal would be forgiven on December 20 of each year that Mr.
Henricks remained an employee of Informix. In connection with Mr. Henricks'
resignation in April 1997, Informix entered into a Separation Agreement with Mr.
Henricks whereby Informix agreed to pay Mr. Henricks nine months salary at a
rate of $25,000.00 per month following his resignation. In addition, Mr.
Henricks agreed to repay the outstanding principal and interest under the note
in equal monthly installments of $17,156.00 through deductions from Mr.
Henricks' monthly severance payments described above.
In connection with David H. Stanley's resignation as Vice President, Legal
and Corporate Services, and General Counsel in October 1997, Informix entered
into a Separation Agreement with Mr. Stanley whereby Informix agreed to pay Mr.
Stanley six months salary at a rate of $16,666.67 per month following his
resignation. In addition, Informix agreed that unvested options to purchase up
to an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock of Informix held by Mr.
Stanley would continue to vest during a one month transition period. Under the
Separation Agreement Informix also agreed to pay Mr. Stanley up to $5,000 for
outplacement services.
Informix has made certain payments to Philip E. White, Informix's former
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in connection with his
resignation pursuant to the terms of an employment agreement between Informix
and Mr. White. See "Informix Management--Employment Agreements and Change in
Control Arrangements."
On November 17, 1997, Informix issued 160,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred
and the Series A-1 Warrant in cancellation of and exchange for all of the
outstanding Series A Preferred and the Series A Warrant previously issued in
connection with a Subscription Agreement, dated August 12, 1997, between
Fletcher International Limited and Informix. The issuance of the Series A-1
Preferred in exchange for the Series A Preferred was effected in reliance on the
exemption under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act. See "Description of
Informix Capital Stock--Preferred Stock." On February 13, 1998, Fletcher
exercised the Series A-1 Warrant with respect to 60,000 shares of Series A-1
Preferred and simultaneously converted 220,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred
into 12,769,908 shares of common stock.
In connection with the issuance of the Series B Preferred in November 1997,
Informix paid Shemano a fee of $1,000,000 for financial advisory services
provided in connection with such financing. In addition, Informix issued Shemano
100,000 shares of its common stock, which are registered and offered for resale
pursuant to this Prospectus. Informix also issued Shemano a warrant to purchase
up to an additional 50,000 shares of common stock because, as of May 15, 1998,
the closing sales price of Informix's common stock was less than $12.50. The
Shemano Warrant is exercisable according to the same terms as the Warrants. In
addition, pursuant to a February 1998 letter agreement with Shemano, Informix
agreed that upon receipt of a written request from Shemano prior to the time the
Commission declares the Registration Statement effective, Informix would
repurchase the Shemano shares. Such repurchase obligation terminated upon the
Commission declaring the Registration Statement covering such shares effective
on May 12, 1998.
138
<PAGE>
Pursuant to both Article VI of Informix's Bylaws and Section 6 of the
Indemnification Agreement Informix enters into with its executive officers and
directors, Informix advances expenses incurred by indemnified parties in
connection with the investigation, defense, settlement or appeal of threatened,
pending or completed action or suits against such parties in their capacity as
an agent of Informix. Under both the Bylaws and the Indemnification Agreement,
the indemnified party will repay Informix for any advanced expenses if it is
ultimately determined that the indemnified party is not entitled to be
indemnified by Informix. See "Risk Factors--Risks Relating to Informix--Legal
Proceedings" and "Business of Informix--Legal Proceedings." As of September 30,
1998, Informix has received invoices for legal fees of approximately $4,113,664
incurred by Informix and certain of its current and former executive officers
and/ or directors in connection with certain actions and suits discussed in this
report, a substantial portion of which has been incurred by these current and
former executive officers and/or directors.
139
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF INFORMIX CAPITAL STOCK
GENERAL
Informix is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01
par value, and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value. Of the
Preferred Stock, 440,000 shares have been designated Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock, none of which are outstanding; 440,000 shares have been
designated Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, of which no shares are
outstanding and of which 80,000 shares are issuable upon exercise of an
outstanding warrant; and 50,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock,
36,000 of which were outstanding as of September 30, 1998; in June 1998, 500
shares of Series B Preferred were converted into 80,008 shares of common stock
of Informix. In September 1998, 13,500 shares of Series B Preferred were
converted into 3,679,472 shares of common stock of Informix. As of September 30,
1998, Informix had an aggregate of 172,310,746 shares of common stock
outstanding (not including 50,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise
of the Shemano Warrant), and an additional 18,140,543 shares of common stock
were issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, of which 3,921,367 shares
were vested and exercisable.
On February 13, 1998, Fletcher elected to exercise its right to purchase
60,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred under the Series A-1 Warrant and
simultaneously converted 220,000 shares of A-1 Preferred into 12,769,908 shares
of common stock.
On January 26, 1998 Fletcher gave Informix a 65 day notice designating
16,674,500 shares as the maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Series A-1 Preferred (including the 12,769,908 issued on
February 13, 1998); prior to the time Fletcher delivered such notice, the
maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series
A-1 Preferred was 13,674,500. Fletcher must give Informix another 65 day notice
to increase the maximum number of conversion shares further.
The following description of Informix's capital stock does not purport to be
complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by Informix's Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, by Informix's Certificates
of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Convertible
Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, by the Rights
Agreement and by the applicable provisions of Delaware law.
The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws as well as
the Rights Agreement contain certain provisions that are intended to enhance the
likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of the Board of
Directors and which may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
future takeover or change in control of Informix unless such takeover or change
in control is approved by the Board of Directors. In addition, acquisitions of
Informix and certain other change-in-control transactions may not be effected
without the consent of the holders of the outstanding Preferred Stock or without
requiring the acquiring entity to assume the Preferred Stock or cause such
Preferred Stock to be redeemed. These provisions are likely to make an
acquisition of Informix more difficult and expensive and could discourage
potential acquirors.
COMMON STOCK
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to
be voted upon by the stockholders. Holders of common stock do not have
cumulative voting rights, and, therefore, holders of a majority of the shares
voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors. In such
event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any
directors.
Holders of the common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be
declared from time to time by the Board of Directors out of funds legally
available therefor, subject to the terms of any existing or future agreements
between Informix and its debtholders. Informix has never declared or paid cash
dividends on its capital stock, expects to retain future earnings, if any, for
use in the operation and
140
<PAGE>
expansion of its business, and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in
the foreseeable future. In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding
up of Informix, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all
assets legally available for distribution after payment of all debts and other
liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any holders of Preferred Stock
then outstanding.
PREFERRED STOCK
Informix is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The
Board of Directors has the authority to issue the Preferred Stock in one or more
series and to fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions
thereof, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting
rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the
number of shares constituting a series or the designation of such series,
without any further vote or action by Informix's stockholders. To date, Informix
has used its ability to designate new series of Preferred Stock in transactions
intended to raise additional capital for Informix. The ability to issue
additional shares of Preferred Stock, however, also provides desirable
flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate
purposes but could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
change in control of Informix without further action by the stockholders and may
adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of, the
holders of common stock. The issuance of Preferred Stock with voting and
conversion rights may adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common
stock, including the loss of voting control to others.
On August 12, 1997, Informix issued 160,000 shares of Series A Preferred to
Fletcher International Limited ("Fletcher") for net proceeds of $37.6 million.
In addition, Informix granted Fletcher a warrant to acquire up to an additional
140,000 shares of Series A Preferred for a purchase price per share of $250. On
November 17, 1997, Informix issued 160,000 shares of the Series A-1 Preferred in
cancellation of and exchange for all of the outstanding Series A Preferred
previously issued to Fletcher. In connection with such cancellation and
exchange, Informix and Fletcher also agreed to cancel the previously granted
warrant to acquire Series A Preferred for the Series A-1 Warrant. The rights,
preferences and privileges of the Series A-1 Preferred are substantially
identical to those of the previously outstanding Series A Preferred, except that
the mandatory redemption terms and certain other provisions differ. In
particular, the holders of Series A Preferred could require Informix to redeem
the Series A Preferred in the event certain conditions were not met in
connection with a third party acquiring Informix or substantially all of its
assets. Under the terms of the Series A-1 Preferred, however, Informix, not the
holders of the Series A-1 Preferred, may make an election to redeem the Series
A-1 Preferred in the event of such a change of control transaction. As a result
of these differences, the Series A Preferred was excluded from stockholders'
equity in Informix's consolidated balance sheet, while the Series A-1 Preferred
is included in stockholders' equity.
The Series A-1 Preferred is convertible into shares of common stock at any
time after issuance. At the holder's option, each share of Series A-1 Preferred,
which has a face value of $250, is convertible into common stock at a per share
price equal to 101% of the average price of the common stock for the 30 trading
days ending five trading days prior to the conversion, but not greater than the
lesser of (i) 105% of the common stock average price of the first five trading
days of such thirty day period or (ii) $12. The number of shares of common stock
to be issued upon conversion will vary based on future stock price movements.
Holders of the Series A-1 Preferred will not be entitled to convert the Series
A-1 Preferred into more than 13,674,500 shares of common stock without first
giving Informix 65 days prior notice. Holders of the A-1 Preferred will be
entitled to a 15% annual dividend, payable quarterly in cash, in the event of
(i) Informix's failure to obtain stockholder approval within 90 days following
any date when the number of shares of common stock issuable or issued upon
conversion of the A-1 Preferred would have exceeded 19.9% of Informix's
outstanding common stock or (ii) the failure of Informix to have a registration
statement declared effective by the Commission under the Securities Act within
180 days following the request of the holders of the Series A-1 Preferred. Such
dividend rights will continue to
141
<PAGE>
accrue until such default has been cured or the shares have been converted or
redeemed. See "--Registration Rights." In the event holders of the Series A-1
Preferred object to the terms of a proposed acquisition of Informix, Informix
may redeem shares of the Series A-1 Preferred at a price of $250 per share, plus
any accrued but unpaid dividends. In the event Informix fails to redeem such
shares, such failure will be deemed a default and Informix will be obligated to
pay a 15% annual dividend (payable quarterly in cash) on such shares until
redeemed or converted. In the event Informix defaults on the payment of any
required dividend, the holders of Series A-1 Preferred will be entitled, voting
separately as a class, to appoint and elect a number of directors (not less than
one) to Informix's Board of Directors such that, following such election, such
new directors will represent a percentage of the total members of the Board that
most nearly approximates the percentage of ownership of Informix held by the
holders of the Series A-1 Preferred on a fully-diluted basis. The Series A-1
Preferred will automatically convert into common stock 18 months following the
date of its issuance by Informix; however, in the event Informix defaults on the
payment of a required dividend other than as a result of a failure to redeem in
connection with certain acquisitions, the automatic conversion date of the
Series A-1 Preferred will be extended for a one-year period beginning on the
date the default is first cured. The automatic conversion date may also be
extended for additional periods under other circumstances. See "Risk
Factors--Risks Relating to Informix--Risks Associated with Preferred Stock
Financings."
The Series B Preferred is convertible at the election of the holder into
shares of common stock beginning on the date six months after issuance, and at
any time prior to such date upon the occurrence of certain events, including
merger and similar transactions which would result in a change of control of
Informix. The currently outstanding Series B Preferred was originally issued on
November 19, 1997. The Series B Preferred will automatically convert into common
stock three years following the date of its issuance by Informix. Each share of
Series B Preferred, which has a face value of $1,000, is convertible into (i)
shares of common stock at a per share price equal to the lowest of (A) the
average of the closing bid prices for the common stock for the 22 trading days
immediately prior to the 180th day following the initial issuance date of the
Series B Preferred, (B) 101% of the average of the closing bid prices for the
common stock for the 22 trading days ending five trading days prior to the date
of actual conversion or (C) 101% of the lowest closing bid price for the common
stock during the five trading days immediately prior to the date of actual
conversion and (ii) Warrants to acquire that number of shares of common stock
equal to 20% of the shares determined pursuant to item (i). The exercise price
for the Warrants is $7.84 per share. The conversion price of the Series B
Preferred is subject to modification and adjustment upon the occurrence of
specified events. The Series B Preferred accrues cumulative dividends at an
annual rate of 5% of the face value of each share of Series B Preferred. The
dividend is generally payable upon the conversion or redemption of the Series B
Preferred, and may be paid in cash or, at Informix's election subject to certain
conditions, in shares of common stock. The Series B Preferred is junior to
Informix's outstanding Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock in respect of
liquidation preference and the right to receive dividend payments. As of
November 11, 1998, series B preferred stockholders had converted 23,350 shares
of series B preferred into 5,889,549 shares of common stock of Informix. In
connection with such conversions, Informix issued warrants to purchase 1,377,901
shares of common stock of Informix at $7.84 per share and paid cash dividends in
the amount of $1,005,945. See "Risk Factors--Risks Relating to Informix--Risks
Associated with Preferred Stock Financings."
In connection with the issuance of the Series B Preferred in November 1997,
Informix paid Shemano a fee of $1,000,000 for financial advisory services
provided in connection with such financing. In addition, Informix issued Shemano
100,000 shares of its common stock. Informix also issued Shemano a warrant to
purchase up to an additional 50,000 shares of common stock due to the fact that,
on May 15, 1998, the closing sales price of Informix's common stock was less
than $12.50. See "Informix Certain Transactions."
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
Informix has agreed that if the Commission imposes a holding period for
securities issued in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in
Regulation S under the Securities Act longer than the 40
142
<PAGE>
day period currently in effect or materially restricts the ability of the
holders of the Series A-1 Preferred to sell or otherwise dispose of such
securities pursuant to Regulation S, upon the request of the Series A-1
Preferred holders, Informix will file with the Commission a registration
statement under the Securities Act covering that number of shares of Informix's
common stock issued or issuable to such holders upon conversion of the Series
A-1 Preferred, and thereafter to use its best efforts to cause such registration
statement to become effective. Informix has agreed to use its best efforts to
keep any such registration effective until the earlier of the date at which time
all applicable securities have been sold, the second anniversary of the issuance
of the Series A Preferred shares or at such time that such securities may
otherwise be sold to the public absent registration.
Informix also agreed to file with the Commission within 45 days following
the sale of the Series B Preferred a registration statement under the Securities
Act covering not less than 150% of that number of shares of common stock
issuable to the Series B Preferred holders upon conversion of the Series B
Preferred and upon exercise of the Warrants at the time of filing, and
thereafter to use its best efforts to cause such registration statement to
become effective. The Commission declared the Registration Statement effective
on May 12, 1998. Informix has agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the
Registration Statement until the earlier to occur of the date on which all of
the applicable securities have been sold thereunder or such time that such
securities may be sold to the public without registration. In addition, Informix
has granted "piggyback" registration rights to holders of the Series B
Preferred, which permit such holders to include shares of common stock issuable
upon conversion of the Series B Preferred and upon exercise of the Warrants in
certain registration statements which may be filed by Informix covering the sale
of shares of common stock for the account of Informix.
ANTITAKEOVER EFFECTS OF PROVISIONS OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS;
RIGHTS AGREEMENT
Informix's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that
all stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called annual or special
meeting and may not be effected by written consent. Informix's Bylaws provide
that, except as otherwise required by law, special meetings of the stockholders
can only be called by the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of
Directors or the President of Informix. In addition, Informix's Bylaws establish
an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an
annual meeting of stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for
election to the Board. Stockholders at an annual meeting may only consider
proposals or nominations specified in the notice of meeting or brought before
the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or by a stockholder
who was a stockholder of record on the record date for the meeting, who is
entitled to vote at the meeting and who has delivered timely written notice in
proper form to Informix's Secretary of the stockholder's intention to bring such
business before the meeting. In addition, the Board of Directors of Informix is
divided into three classes, with each class standing for election once every
three years.
Informix's Board of Directors has declared a dividend of one Purchase Right
(for purposes of this subsection, a "Right") under a Rights Agreement (the
"Informix Rights Agreement") for each share of Informix's common stock
outstanding on September 17, 1991 or thereafter issued. When exercisable, each
Right initially entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at a
specified price. The Rights become exercisable on the earlier of: (i) the tenth
day (or such later date as may be determined by a majority of Informix's
Directors not affiliated with the acquiring person or group (the "Continuing
Directors")) after a person or group has acquired, or obtained the right to
acquire, beneficial ownership of 20% of more of Informix's outstanding common
stock or (ii) the tenth business day (or such later date as may be determined by
a majority of the Continuing Directors) following the commencement of, or
announcement of an intention to make, a tender offer or exchange offer the
consummation of which would result in beneficial ownership by a person or group
of 20% or more of Informix's outstanding common stock. If an acquiror obtains
20% or more of Informix's outstanding common stock (other than in certain
permitted transactions), and unless the Rights are earlier redeemed, the holder
of each unexercised Right
143
<PAGE>
will have the right to receive shares of Informix's common stock having a value
equal to two times the purchase price. Similarly, unless the Rights are earlier
redeemed, after the tenth day following certain acquisition transactions, proper
provision must be made so that holders of Rights (other than those beneficially
owned by an acquiring person, which will thereafter be void) will thereafter
have the right to receive, upon exercise, shares of common stock of the
acquiring company having a value equal to two times the purchase price. The
Informix Rights Agreement has been amended so as to prevent holders of the
Series A-1 Preferred and the holders of the Series B Preferred from being deemed
acquiring persons under the Informix Rights Agreement by virtue of their
beneficial ownership of securities issued or issuable in connection with the
sale and issuance of Preferred Stock. The Rights expire on July 25, 2005 or on
their earlier exchange, redemption or expiration in connection with certain
permitted transactions. See "Informix Management--Executive Compensation;
Employment Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements."
The foregoing provisions of Informix's Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation Bylaws and the Informix Rights Agreement are intended to enhance
the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of the Board of
Directors and in the policies formulated by the Board of Directors and to
discourage certain types of transactions which may involve an actual or
threatened change of control of Informix. Such provisions are designed to reduce
the vulnerability of Informix to an unsolicited acquisition proposal and,
accordingly, could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or
prevent a change in control of Informix. Such provisions are also intended to
discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights but could, however,
have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for Informix's
shares and, consequently, may also inhibit fluctuations in the market price of
Informix's shares that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts.
These provisions may also have the effect of preventing changes in the
management of Informix. In addition, acquisitions of Informix and certain other
change-in-control transactions may not be effected without the consent of the
holders of the outstanding Preferred Stock or without requiring the acquiring
entity to assume the Preferred Stock or cause such Preferred Stock to be
redeemed. These provisions are likely to make an acquisition of Informix more
difficult and expensive and could discourage potential acquirors. See "Risk
Factors--Risks Relating to Informix--Antitakeover Protections" and
"--Antitakeover Effects of Provisions of Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws; Rights Agreement; Effects of Delaware Antitakeover Statute."
EFFECT OF DELAWARE ANTITAKEOVER STATUTE
Informix is subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
(the "Antitakeover Law"), which regulates corporate acquisitions. The
Antitakeover Law prevents certain Delaware corporations, including those whose
securities are listed for trading on the Nasdaq National Market, from engaging,
under certain circumstances in a "business combination" with any "interested
stockholder" for three years following the date that such stockholder became an
interested stockholder. For purposes of the Antitakeover Law, a "business
combination" includes, among other things, a merger or consolidation involving
Informix and the interested stockholder and the sale of more than ten percent
(10%) of Informix's assets. In general, the Antitakeover Law defines an
"interested stockholder" as any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more
the outstanding voting stock of Informix and any entity or person affiliated
with or controlling or controlled by such entity or person. A Delaware
corporation may "opt out" of the Antitakeover Law with an express provision in
its original certificate of incorporation or an express provision in its
certificate of incorporation or bylaws resulting from amendments approved by the
holders of at least a majority of Informix's outstanding voting shares. Informix
has not "opted out" of the provisions of the Antitakeover Law. See "Risk
Factors--Risks Relating to Informix--Antitakeover Protections."
TRANSFER AGENT
The Transfer Agent and Registrar for the common stock is Boston Equiserve
LP.
144
<PAGE>
BUSINESS OF RED BRICK
OVERVIEW
Red Brick designs, develops, markets and supports data warehousing software.
Red Brick's flagship product, Red Brick Warehouse, is a high performance,
client/server relational database management system ("RDBMS") software product
specifically designed for data warehousing, data mart, data mining and on-line
analytical processing ("OLAP") applications. Red Brick's second major product,
Red Brick Formation, which was introduced in September 1998, is an Extraction,
Transformation, Movement and Loading ("ETML") tool used by customers to take
data from transaction processing and legacy data sources and prepare it for use
in a data warehouse. Red Brick assists customers in designing and building data
warehouse solutions. Red Brick's software enables IT professionals and business
managers to implement quickly and manage effectively data warehouse applications
and provides decision makers with easy access to critical information necessary
to make more informed decisions.
Red Brick's products comprise a suite of data warehouse RDBMS servers, data
mining software, data warehouse administration tools, ETML tools, and
connectivity software designed to enable organizations to implement data
warehouse solutions across their organizations. Red Brick's products today
address five main activities of building and using a data warehouse: data
extraction, data transformation, load processing, warehouse data management and
query processing. Red Brick's products work together, and integrate with popular
third-party data warehousing products, to form an end-to-end data warehouse
platform which Red Brick calls DecisionScape.
Red Brick's client/server based products are designed to support open
industry standards, which provide its customers flexibility in selecting
computing environments and data warehouse tools. Red Brick markets its software
and related services primarily through a direct sales organization and through
value-added resellers, system integrators, consulting partners, hardware
partners and distributors worldwide. Red Brick's customers include: 360
Communications Company, Amazon.com, AT&T, Barnes & Noble, BellSouth, BlueCross
BlueShield Association Federal Employee Program, Catalina Marketing, Estee
Lauder, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Hewlett-Packard, Bass Hotels &
Resorts, Inc., The Kroger Company, NASA, Pepsi-Cola Company, Reuters Information
Technology, Sara Lee Corporation, Tenneco Packaging, Tufts Associated Health
Plans, and WorldCom.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Business enterprises continually strive to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of their operations in today's increasingly competitive global
business environment. The pace and complexity of business decision making has
increasingly become a greater challenge for organizations. Decision making
authority has generally become more distributed throughout all levels of an
organization, creating a need by more people to access information used for
making critical business decisions. In adapting to this new business
environment, organizations have implemented computer systems and technologies
that increase efficiency through automating transaction processing.
On-line transaction processing ("OLTP") systems are used to automate those
business functions that generate records that can be processed and stored
electronically, such as automatic teller machines, reservation centers and
telephone calls. In today's organizations, many thousands of these transactions
may occur every second of every day, generating vast amounts of business data.
This dramatic increase in the quantity of transaction data has led to the
development of RDBMS technologies designed and optimized for collecting and
storing transaction data.
Organizations seek to make faster, more accurate and more confident business
decisions by effectively using the vast amount of data generated by these OLTP
systems. However, organizations have discovered limitations in using the same
OLTP system for both transaction processing and decision support. For example,
OLTP systems maintain only recent operating data on-line, making real-time
analysis of historical
145
<PAGE>
data very difficult. In addition, organizations maintain separate OLTP systems
for each specific business function, such as purchasing, inventory management
and point of sale transactions, making cross-functional analysis of information
contained in these separate databases problematic. Furthermore, to process
hundreds or thousands of transactions per second, the transaction processing
systems store data in formats designed for transaction performance rather than
for use by business people for decision support. Finally, conducting analysis
and transaction processing on the same system substantially degrades the OLTP
systems' performance, jeopardizing the execution of routine business
transactions that are critical to organizations. As a result, organizations have
found it difficult to utilize OLTP systems for decision support.
To enable more effective decision making, organizations have established
separate, dedicated systems for decision support. However, these organizations
have encountered limitations in applying traditional RDBMS technologies, which
have been optimized for OLTP applications, as their decision support databases.
For example, OLTP RDBMSs have been designed to process thousands of small,
predetermined structured updates every second. Business analysis applications,
on the other hand, require performing relatively few, highly unstructured,
ad-hoc, read-intensive queries per minute. In addition, OLTP RDBMS technologies
have been optimized to access and update a small number of records with every
transaction, whereas a single query for business analysis could require the
access and retrieval of millions of records. OLTP RDBMSs are optimized for
continual collection and processing of transactional data, whereas decision
support systems require a methodology more focused on extraction and analysis of
data. OLTP RDBMSs are unable to store effectively and manage the vast amounts of
historical and cross-functional data required by a decision support application.
For all of the above reasons, it is difficult to pose and answer business
questions using traditional OLTP RDBMS applications.
To utilize transaction data effectively for better decision making,
organizations require a RDBMS optimized for decision support and maintained
separately from OLTP RDBMSs. These separate RDBMSs, referred to as data
warehouses, must contain weeks, months, and even years of summary and detailed
historical business data that can amount to gigabytes and terabytes of
information necessary for analysis and decision making.
Because data warehouses are separate databases from organizations' OLTP
systems, and because data warehouses contain data in different formats than in
their OLTP systems, customers implementing data warehouses need tools to assist
in taking data from their many OLTP systems and putting the data into the data
warehouse RDBMS. These tools have come to be called ETML tools.
SOLUTION
Red Brick designs, develops, markets and supports Red Brick Warehouse, a
RDBMS software product optimized to meet the new requirements of data warehouse,
data mart, data mining, and OLAP applications, and Red Brick Formation, a
scalable and highly functional ETML tool used to assist in the creation and
management of these applications. Red Brick believes Red Brick Warehouse was the
first open RDBMS software product designed specifically for these applications.
Red Brick has capitalized on more than ten years of experience in decision
support systems and technologies to assist customers in designing and building
data warehouse solutions.
Red Brick's current products address five main activities of building and
using a data warehouse: data extraction, data transformation, load processing,
warehouse data management and query processing:
DATA EXTRACTION--COPY DATA FROM LEGACY AND OLTP SYSTEMS
Virtually all of the data to be stored in a data warehouse originates in an
existing operational system. The Red Brick Formation product assists in copying
data out of operational systems and moving the data to the physical computer
hosting the data warehouse database. Red Brick's extraction and movement
146
<PAGE>
subsystem accomplishes this task with less staff effort than manual methods, and
at data rates which Red Brick believes are significantly higher than typically
achieved with competing products.
DATA TRANSFORMATION--CLEAN AND FORMAT DATA FOR THE WAREHOUSE
The data stored in a data warehouse is never just a copy of the original
source data from OLTP systems. Source data must be simplified, cleaned,
corrected, reorganized, reformatted, and prepared for analytical use in the
warehouse. The Red Brick Formation product provides a sophisticated Graphical
User Interface that allows the customer to design and implement this complex
cleaning and transformation process using a simple "drag and drop" interface.
Red Brick believes its transformation subsystem can support more complex
transformations than can competing products, and does so more quickly and simply
because of its powerful user interface.
LOAD PROCESSING--SIMPLIFY DATA LOAD PROCESSING AND IMPROVE DATA LOAD
PERFORMANCE
A significant problem for the information technology or MIS department of an
organization is loading data into the warehouse, indexing it for access,
ensuring its quality and performing other operations, such as summarizing sales
by region, during a short period of time when users are not on the system. The
Red Brick Warehouse and Red Brick Formation products work together to simplify
and accelerate this critical process. Red Brick's load processing subsystem
typically offers load speeds significantly faster than competing products, while
at the same time automatically building indices and summarizations and verifying
data integrity.
WAREHOUSE DATA MANAGEMENT--COST EFFECTIVELY STORE AND MANAGE VERY LARGE
AMOUNTS OF DATA
Data warehouse solutions typically store very large amounts of data, are
oriented by time, and require periodic, large updates. Red Brick's tools and
technologies make managing the warehouse simple and cost effective. Red Brick
Warehouse is based on a modular storage model and provides simplified
administrative interfaces and systems management functions optimized for very
large data warehouse environments. Red Brick's tools and technologies enable
features such as disk failure management, implementation of backup and restore
procedures, movement of data throughout the warehouse network and end user
administration and monitoring.
QUERY PROCESSING--QUICKLY AND EASILY ANALYZE LARGE VOLUMES OF BUSINESS
INFORMATION
Red Brick Warehouse is designed to provide easy, cost effective access to
either a single data warehouse or networked data warehouses of information for
tens of users to thousands of users. Red Brick believes that its solution can
substantially improve the quality and timeliness of an organization's decision
making. Red Brick's solution specifically addresses the three key aspects
required to ensure effective business analysis: posing questions easily,
typically getting answers fast and ensuring that the underlying data is of the
highest quality. Red Brick's solution can process business questions
significantly faster than traditional OLTP RDBMSs, and often provides greater
performance advantages for more complex questions. The solution also offers
query functions, called RISQL, that allow business questions to be easily posed
and processed and specialized functions that verify data integrity.
Red Brick capitalizes on more than ten years of decision support expertise
to assist customers in rapidly developing and implementing Red Brick data
warehouse solutions. Red Brick's professional services organization has captured
this experience in a Data Warehouse Implementation Methodology, which describes
the process for designing, developing, and deploying successful data warehouse
solutions. An understandable, extensible database design is a major factor in
the success of a data warehouse. To further accelerate time to production, Red
Brick provides language tools that enable quick query development. In certain
industry segments, Red Brick offers "quick start" solution kits that include
prepackaged designs and business questions that can be quickly tailored to meet
specific customer needs.
147
<PAGE>
Finally, Red Brick's Partners and Value Extended Reseller ("PaVER") program,
which consists of more than 75 companies that support Red Brick Warehouse, gives
the customer the flexibility to choose best of class tools to complete their
client/server data warehouse implementations.
PRODUCTS
Red Brick provides a suite of integrated data warehouse products that are
designed to enable organizations to implement data warehouse solutions across
their organizations. These products, marketed as the DecisionScape platform,
consist of a specialized RDBMS--Red Brick Warehouse--which includes data mining
software, aggregate management software, data warehouse connectivity software
and administration tools, and an ETML tool--Red Brick Formation. Customers are
able to access their data warehouses through private networks and over the World
Wide Web. Red Brick's products have been designed to address five main elements
of a data warehouse: data extraction, data transformation, load processing,
warehouse data management and query processing. Red Brick's products are
generally available on industry-leading UNIX platforms, including Digital,
Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Sun, and on Windows NT. Pricing of Red Brick's products
depends on a number of factors, including the size of the computer system,
number of named users and number of processors. Red Brick's software products
include:
RDBMS PRODUCTS
The RDBMS products are based on the Red Brick Warehouse technology and
include:
- RED BRICK WAREHOUSE. Red Brick Warehouse is an RDBMS product specifically
designed to meet the needs and requirements of a data warehouse
environment. The target environment for Red Brick Warehouse is symmetric
multi-processing server systems, typically at the division or profit
center level within an organization. Red Brick Warehouse Version 5.1, the
ninth major release of Red Brick Warehouse technology, was first shipped
in January 1998. This release features advances in performance,
scalability, and functionality, and includes aggregate management and data
mining functionality fully integrated into the data warehouse RDBMS
engine.
- RED BRICK WAREHOUSE FOR WINDOWS NT. Red Brick Warehouse for Windows NT is
an RDBMS product designed for data warehouse and data mart applications
running on Intel-based Windows NT servers.
- RED BRICK WAREHOUSE FOR WORKGROUPS. Red Brick Warehouse for Workgroups is
a version of the Red Brick Warehouse product designed to be implemented on
single processor systems, typically at the workgroup level within an
organization.
Each of Red Brick's three RDBMS products can work together in a networked
configuration.
CONNECTIVITY SOFTWARE
Red Brick offers connectivity software to provide efficient and effective
client/server access to Red Brick Warehouse, ensuring maximum flexibility in
selecting computing environments, as well as complementing existing investments
in information technology. These products include:
- RED BRICK ODBC. Red Brick ODBC is a connectivity software product that is
installed on client machines connected to Red Brick RDBMS and provides
complete access to the Red Brick Warehouse in accordance with Open
Database Connectivity specifications.
148
<PAGE>
ADMINISTRATION TOOLS
These tools are designed for IT professionals and business managers within
organizations to implement their data warehouse applications effectively and
include:
- RED BRICK VISTA. Red Brick Vista was released in January 1998 and is a
comprehensive, server-integrated solution for the computation and
management of aggregates, a method of improving performance by
pre-calculating summary information.
- AUTO AGGREGATE LOAD OPTION. Auto Aggregate Load Option provides the
capability to create summary records for incoming OLTP data automatically,
and is a tool for accepting or rejecting incoming records based on
pre-determined criteria. This product is now incorporated into Red Brick
Vista.
- SQL-BACKTRACK-TM- FOR RED BRICK WAREHOUSE. In January 1998 Red Brick began
shipping SQL-BackTrack-TM- for Red Brick Warehouse, a backup and recovery
system designed specifically for Red Brick. SQL-BackTrack-TM- provides for
fast, easy, and safe recovery of data warehouse data in the event of a
system failure.
- PARALLEL TABLE MANAGEMENT UTILITY. Parallel Table Management Utility
allows better utilization of multi-processor hardware systems for data
loading, performs data conversion, index building and verification of
referential integrity, and handles unexpected failure in the middle of
multi-tape load processes, allowing efficient and effective recovery.
- RED BRICK WAREHOUSE ADMINISTRATOR. Red Brick Warehouse Administrator is a
graphical Windows-based client tool designed for database administrators
to manage general Red Brick Warehouse 5.1 administration tasks with an
emphasis on segmentation assistance.
ETML PRODUCTS
The Red Brick Formation product is a recent addition to the Red Brick
product line, and was first shipped in September 1998. Red Brick Formation is a
product for data Extraction, Transformation, Movement, and Loading, and works in
conjunction with Red Brick Warehouse as well as with other RDBMS products
including Oracle 8 and Microsoft SQL Server. Red Brick Formation includes the
following components:
- RED BRICK FORMATION ARCHITECT. Red Brick Formation Architect runs under
Windows NT and provides the customer with a Graphical User Interface for
designing and creating a "job" move data from a Legacy or OLTP system into
a data warehouse. Such a "job" typically extracts data from one or more
source systems, combines, cleans, and reformats that data, and loads the
results into a data warehouse database.
- RED BRICK FORMATION FLOW ENGINE. The Red Brick Formation Flow Engine runs
under Windows NT and popular Unix systems, and is a server product that
actually executes the jobs created with the Red Brick Formation Architect.
A typical initial purchase by a customer includes the purchase of one or two
Red Brick Warehouse RDBMS product licenses and two or more of the administration
tools offered by Red Brick. While the tools are not required in an initial data
warehouse implementation, organizations realize the benefits gained by using
these tools in managing and optimizing their data warehouses as they begin to
bring their data warehouse implementations into production and as the number,
size and complexity of their data warehouse implementations grow. Red Brick
Formation is offered as a separate product, and may be purchased in conjunction
with a Red Brick Warehouse license, at a later time after a Red Brick Warehouse
license, or separately without a Red Brick Warehouse license. Customers are
required to purchase a first-year maintenance contract with each product
license, and many customers choose to purchase consulting
149
<PAGE>
services for solution design and implementation. Many customers also purchase
new computer hardware and consulting services from third parties when
implementing a data warehouse. Red Brick often sells a customer additional data
warehouse applications as the customer implements additional data warehouse
systems across the organization.
TECHNOLOGY
Red Brick has developed core proprietary technologies that effectively
address the three key components of data warehousing: load processing, warehouse
data management and query processing. Red Brick has also purchased in-process
technologies from CMG Information Services, Inc. ("CMGI") and its subsidiary,
Engage Technologies, Inc. ("Engage"). Red Brick Formation, the first product
resulting from this transaction, was released in September 1998. Red Brick
Formation is a data ETML tool. Since Red Brick Formation is a new product in its
first commercial version, it has not yet proved that it is sufficient in terms
of functionality, performance or reliability to meet customer requirements or
that it will be generally salable. As a result, Red Brick does not know if Red
Brick Formation will contribute in a material way to Red Brick's revenues. The
failure of Red Brick Formation to operate as expected could seriously harm Red
Brick's business, operating results and financial condition. The purchased
technology will also be used for additional future development efforts aimed at
extending the integrated DecisionScape data warehouse platform. Red Brick's
products include the following technologies:
STARINDEX AND STARJOIN
STARjoin is a critical technology for Red Brick Warehouse performance. With
STARjoin, multiple relational tables may be joined at one time in a fast,
single-pass operation as compared to conventional technologies that join tables
one pair at a time, requiring the creation of many temporary tables for complex
queries. The STARjoin technology allows Red Brick Warehouse to join two or more
tables in a single step. A typical query in a Red Brick Warehouse application
will join more than five tables in a single step. The STARjoin algorithm uses
the STARindex to accelerate join processing. The STARindex relates rows in the
various tables of a database using a compact, easily-maintained structure. The
STARindex is completely transparent to end-users and is created and maintained
by the database administrator like any other standard B-Tree index used in most
relational database products.
PARALLEL QUERY
Red Brick Warehouse includes complete parallel query processing technology.
On parallel hardware systems, each query is automatically divided into multiple
sub-parts, each of which is processed at the same time on different processors,
which improves query performance time.
SEGMENTED STORAGE
Red Brick's Segmented Storage architecture allows tables and indexes to be
distributed intelligently across the many disks that comprise a large data
warehouse. As a result, the database is better organized, easier to manage, more
reliable and provides improved performance. The ability to manage the sub-
components of a very large data warehouse separately makes the management of
terabyte-sized warehouses achievable.
PIPELINED PARALLEL LOAD
The Load Data function is designed to perform complete load processing. The
loader not only places row data into a target database table, but also performs
data format conversions, referential integrity checking and multiple index
building as one concurrent, integrated operation. The parallel loader uses an
Adaptive Pipeline Parallel technology that allows each row being loaded to move
through a set of steps, with a different processor performing each step.
150
<PAGE>
AGGREGATE ADVISOR AND QUERY RE-WRITE
The Aggregate Advisor management and navigation system can automatically
notify warehouse administrators of appropriate aggregation strategies based on
actual warehouse usage, lessening the amount of time it takes to maintain the
warehouse and design an aggregation strategy. The Query Re-Write capability
automatically alters queries submitted to the warehouse to use available
aggregate tables without requiring the end user to know that the aggregates
exist. This allows administrators to alter aggregation strategies without having
to re-train users or migrate changes to hundreds or thousands of workstations.
RISQL EXTENSIONS
Structured Query Language ("SQL") has long been established as the standard
for relational database access. Red Brick has implemented a rich set of SQL
extensions, called RISQL (Red Brick Intelligent SQL), which allow Red Brick
Warehouse users to ask many practical business questions that cannot be asked
with SQL alone. These RISQL extensions allow the server to directly process
queries involving rankings, moving averages, running totals and a variety of
other important business measures. Using RISQL extensions, most business queries
can be completely processed by the server, thus eliminating the need for
client-side post processing.
TARGETINDEX
Based in part on bit-mapped index technologies, TARGETindex provides for
very fast selection of groups from large, multi-attribute lists, such as
targeting a micro market from a large customer list.
FAST GROUP CALCULATIONS
Red Brick Warehouse contains technology to process group calculations in
memory. Specialized data structures are used to store the group results in
memory, eliminating significant disk input/output and processing time.
DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION
Red Brick Warehouse takes a fundamentally different approach than
traditional OLTP RDBMSs to query optimization, using Dynamic Optimization to
repeatedly re-evaluate its query execution strategy while the query is running
to produce substantially better performance.
ON DEMAND PARALLEL
Red Brick's On-Demand Parallel query processing includes special technology
that adapts and changes the degree of parallelism used to dynamically achieve
maximum throughput, enhancing optimized performance in changing multi-user
environments with varying workloads. Integrated Data Mining. Red Brick Data Mine
Option is server-based software fully integrated into the Red Brick Warehouse
RDBMS engine. It is used to read very large volumes of data--hundreds of
millions of rows and hundreds of attributes--to find patterns, trends, and
relationships that would be difficult to find with traditional drill-down
querying techniques. Using models based on these relationships, users are better
able to predict the impact of decisions on their customers, businesses and
markets.
CONTINUALLY ADAPTIVE INDEXING
Red Brick's Continually Adaptive Indexing extends TARGETindex technology to
provide indexes which automatically and continually adapt to the data that is
being indexed. Red Brick Warehouse automatically selects the optimal index type
on a per value, not per index basis, which enables considerable speed and
efficiency gains.
151
<PAGE>
HYBRID HASH JOIN
Red Brick's Hybrid Hash Join includes sophisticated optimizations such as
full sub-join recursion (needed to efficiently handle very large joins), role
reversal (needed to efficiently join dissimilarly sized tables) and bit
filtering (needed to improve hash join efficiency). For the end user, Red
Brick's advanced hash join can more quickly process queries against complex
schemas.
TARGETJOIN
Red Brick Warehouse 5.1 introduced TARGETjoin, a new join algorithm.
TARGETjoin accelerates complex decision support queries through its parallel
bitmap join technology.
CUSTOMERS AND MARKETS
To date, Red Brick has issued software licenses to more than 350 customers
in a variety of industries. Red Brick's customers include: 360 Communications
Company, Amazon.com, AT&T, Barnes & Noble, BellSouth, BlueCross BlueShield
Association Federal Employee Program, Catalina Marketing, Estee Lauder, Goodyear
Tire and Rubber Company, Hewlett-Packard, Bass Hotels & Resorts, Inc., The
Kroger Company, NASA, Pepsi-Cola Company, Reuters Information Technology, Sara
Lee Corporation, Tenneco Packaging, Tufts Associated Health Plans, and WorldCom.
SALES AND MARKETING
Red Brick markets its products and services primarily through its direct
sales force and professional services organization. Red Brick employs highly
skilled engineers and technically proficient sales persons capable of serving
the sophisticated needs of its customers' information and business management
staffs. Red Brick has domestic sales or support staff located in approximately
20 locations in the United States and Canada, and in international offices in
London, England and Tokyo, Japan. In addition to its direct sales efforts, Red
Brick utilizes advertising, direct mail and public relations programs,
participates in industry trade shows and organizes seminars to promote the
adoption of its products and methodologies.
Red Brick provides customers maximum flexibility and choice in building data
warehouse applications, and has established a "PaVER" (Partner and
Value-Extended Reseller) Program to foster relationships with third parties
whose products and services are often used in conjunction with Red Brick
Warehouse. The PaVER program provides Red Brick Warehouse customers the ability
to utilize existing technologies or select from a broad group of front-end tools
when implementing data warehouse systems. Red Brick has more than 75 vendors in
its PaVER Program. During 1996, Red Brick implemented its PaVER Gold Program, a
technical certification initiative designed to provide Red Brick Warehouse users
with a choice of software products that exploit the specialized decision support
capabilities of Red Brick Warehouse. In the PaVER Gold program, partners have
committed to tight interoperability between their software products and Red
Brick Warehouse, to support future releases of Red Brick Warehouse within a
specified amount of time after each release, and to establish reciprocal
technical support links with Red Brick to quickly resolve technical issues with
joint customers.
International revenues consist of export revenues and prior to September 16,
1998 also included revenues from Red Brick's Australasia subsidiary. (At such
date, Red Brick reduced its controlling interest in such subsidiary to
approximately ten percent of the subsidiary's outstanding capital stock.) Red
Brick's international revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 were
17% of total revenues and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995,
were 17%, 10%, and 8% of total revenues, respectively. Red Brick Australasia's
revenues for such periods were 2%, 1%, 0% and 0% of total revenues,
respectively.
Red Brick has a captive lease program that operates under the name of Red
Brick Capital to provide customers with financing options for Red Brick's
products and services. In connection with this program,
152
<PAGE>
Red Brick entered into a services agreement with Integrated Lease Management
("ILM"), a non-affiliated leasing group, to provide lease management and lease
financing services. The agreement can be renewed in successive twelve-month
periods. Under the lease program, Red Brick Capital assigns, on a non-recourse
basis, the software finance agreement executed between Red Brick Capital and the
end user customer to certain funders arranged by ILM.
In January 1998, Red Brick appointed Lawrence Howard as Vice President,
North American sales, and in July 1998, Red Brick appointed Paul Rodwick as Vice
President, Marketing. Also, in July 1998, Anthony Layzell, who had been serving
as Red Brick's Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing, resigned from Red
Brick to pursue other interests. During late 1997 and throughout 1998, there has
been significant turnover in Red Brick's direct sales force. This transition in
sales and marketing management, as well as the turnover in the sales force, may
have an adverse effect on Red Brick's operating results.
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES
Red Brick believes that providing superior customer service and
implementation expertise is critical for customer success. Red Brick's strategy
is to deliver technology and services that enable its customers and partners to
implement data warehouse applications quickly. Most of Red Brick's customers
currently have maintenance agreements that entitle them to technical support,
training and periodic upgrades. Red Brick also offers additional training and
consulting services on a fee basis.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Red Brick has established a centralized corporate technical service group
that is supported by the consulting and field engineering groups. Red Brick
provides customers with a comprehensive array of services, including software
updates, documentation updates, telephone support, product maintenance,
emergency response and access to a product enhancement request database. Red
Brick offers support programs that include up to 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
telephone support.
TRAINING
Red Brick offers customer training courses on Red Brick Warehouse products
and database design. Regularly scheduled courses are offered at Red Brick's
headquarters in Los Gatos, California. Individual customer courses are provided
at the customers' facilities.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Beginning in early 1997, Red Brick significantly expanded its professional
services organization. Red Brick offers a variety of solution-oriented
consulting services delivered either by specialists from Red Brick or through a
network of third-party consultants trained on Red Brick Warehouse. These
services are built around a structured Data Warehousing Implementation
Methodology, and include data warehouse design and modeling, data preparation,
data loading, installation, implementation, systems maintenance and upgrading.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Red Brick has made substantial investments in research and development. Red
Brick believes that its future performance will depend in large part on its
ability to maintain and enhance its current product line, develop new products
that achieve market acceptance, maintain technological competitiveness and meet
an expanding range of customer requirements. Red Brick intends to expand its
existing product offerings and to introduce new products for the data warehouse
software market. Although Red Brick expects that certain of its new products
will be developed internally, Red Brick may, based on timing and cost
considerations, acquire technology or products from third parties.
153
<PAGE>
On August 29, 1997, Red Brick executed a technology purchase agreement with
CMGI and Engage, whereby Red Brick acquired the in-process source code and
related documentation to the Engage software technology "Engage.Fusion" and
"Engage.Discover," and such products' shared, object-oriented, metadata
facility, all of which are currently technology under development. In the third
quarter of 1997 Red Brick took a charge of approximately $11.0 million for
in-process technology based upon an independent appraisal. Red Brick paid CMGI
$9.5 million in cash and issued to CMGI 238,160 shares of unregistered Red Brick
common stock. At the time of the purchase, the acquired technology had not yet
reached technological feasibility and did not have alternative future uses.
Subsequent to the acquisition of this technology, Red Brick invested
approximately $5.2 million to develop Red Brick Formation, which was released in
September 1998. The purchased technology will be used for additional future
development efforts aimed at extending the integrated DecisionScape data
warehouse platform. If Red Brick is unable, for technological or other reasons,
to develop this technology, Red Brick's business, operating results and
financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
In July 1998, Red Brick announced its intention to build and market analytic
application products in addition to its Red Brick Warehouse and Red Brick
Formation product lines. There can be no assurance that Red Brick will be
successful in developing and marketing these analytic application products. In
addition, there can be no assurance that Red Brick will be successful in
developing other product enhancements or new products that respond to
technological change or evolving industry standards, that Red Brick will not
experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development,
introduction, and marketing of these new products and product enhancements, or
that Red Brick's new products and product enhancements will adequately meet the
requirements of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance. Any potential new
products or product enhancements would likely be subject to significant
technical risks. If Red Brick experiences delays in the commencement of
commercial shipments of new products and enhancements, Red Brick could
experience delays or loss of product revenues. If Red Brick is unable, for
technological or other reasons, to develop and introduce new products or
enhancements of existing products in a timely manner in response to changing
market conditions or customer requirements, Red Brick's business, operating
results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Red Brick plans to release new versions of its Red Brick Warehouse
periodically and to continue to develop new administration tools to be used with
Red Brick Warehouse; however, there can be no assurance such new versions or
administration tools will be released. These potential new versions and
administration tools, as well as the products to be developed based on the
acquired in-process technology, are subject to significant technical risks. Red
Brick may experience delays in the commencement of commercial shipments of
potential new versions, administration tools, and new products resulting in
delay or loss of product revenues. If the potential new versions of Red Brick
Warehouse or the potential new application tools do not achieve market
acceptance, or Red Brick is unable, for technological or other reasons, to
develop, introduce and sell such versions, application tools, or new products in
a timely manner, Red Brick's business, operating results and financial condition
will be materially adversely affected. Software products as complex as those
offered by Red Brick may contain undetected errors or failures when first
introduced or when new versions are released. Red Brick has in the past
discovered software errors in certain of its new products after their
introduction. When Red Brick discovers a software error in a product, Red
Brick's customer service and research and development organizations typically
work with the customer in an attempt to resolve the problem. In most cases, Red
Brick can provide a solution over the phone. Occasionally, a Red Brick
representative may visit a customer site to assist the customer in solving the
problem. Although Red Brick has not experienced materially adverse effects
resulting from any such errors to date, there can be no assurance that, despite
testing by Red Brick and by current and potential customers, errors will not be
found in new versions of Red Brick Warehouse, administration tools, or new
products after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or
delay in market acceptance, which could have a material adverse effect upon Red
Brick's business, operating results and financial condition.
154
<PAGE>
COMPETITION
The market for Red Brick's products is intensely competitive and subject to
rapid change. Red Brick primarily encounters competition from large, public
companies, including Oracle Corporation, Informix Corporation, Sybase, Inc.,
International Business Machines Corporation, and NCR/Teradata. With the
introduction in September 1998 of the Red Brick Formation product, Red Brick
expects to encounter competition from a new category of vendors, including
Ardent and Informatica. In addition, because there are relatively low barriers
to entry for certain components within the software market, Red Brick expects
additional competition from other established and emerging companies if the data
warehouse market continues to develop and expand. Red Brick believes that the
principal competitive factors affecting its market include first-to-market
product capabilities, product performance, price, support of industry standards,
ease of use, and customer and technical support and service. Although Red Brick
believes that its products currently compete favorably with respect to such
factors, there can be no assurance that Red Brick can maintain its competitive
position against current and potential competitors, especially those with
significantly greater financial, marketing, service, support, technical and
other resources.
Most of Red Brick's competitors have longer operating histories,
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than
Red Brick, significantly greater name recognition and a larger installed base of
customers. In addition, many of Red Brick's competitors have well-established
relationships with current and potential customers of Red Brick, have extensive
knowledge of the relational database industry and are capable of offering a
single vendor solution. As a result, Red Brick's competitors may be able to
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and
sale of their products than can Red Brick. In addition, current and potential
competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among
themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to
address customer needs. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or
alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market
share. Red Brick also expects that competition will increase as a result of
software industry consolidations. Increased competition is likely to result in
price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. Any of these
effects could materially adversely affect Red Brick's business, operating
results and financial condition. There can be no assurance that Red Brick will
be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that
competitive pressures faced by Red Brick will not materially adversely affect
its business, operating results and financial condition.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND OTHER PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
Red Brick relies primarily on a combination of copyright and trademark laws,
trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect
its proprietary technology. For example, Red Brick licenses rather than sells
its software and requires licensees to enter into license agreements, which
impose certain restrictions on licensees' ability to utilize the software. In
addition, Red Brick seeks to avoid disclosure of its trade secrets, including
but not limited to requiring those persons with access to Red Brick's
proprietary information to execute confidentiality agreements with Red Brick and
restricting access to Red Brick's source code. Red Brick seeks to protect its
software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and
copyright laws, which afford only limited protection. Red Brick has filed
provisional patent applications in the United States with respect to certain
aspects of its software. None of these patents have been issued and there can be
no assurance that a patent or patents will be issued pursuant to any of these
applications or that, if granted, such patent or patents would survive a legal
challenge to its validity or provide significant protection to Red Brick.
Despite Red Brick's efforts to protect its proprietary rights, unauthorized
parties may attempt to copy aspects of Red Brick's products or to obtain and use
information that Red Brick regards as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of
Red Brick's products is difficult, and while Red Brick is unable to determine
the extent to which piracy of its software products exists, software piracy can
be expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws
155
<PAGE>
of some foreign countries do not protect Red Brick's proprietary rights to as
great an extent as do the laws of the United States. There can be no assurance
that Red Brick's means of protecting its proprietary rights will be adequate or
that Red Brick's competitors will not independently develop similar technology.
Although Red Brick has not been notified that Red Brick's products infringe the
proprietary rights of third parties, there can be no assurance that third
parties will not claim infringement by Red Brick with respect to current or
future products. Red Brick expects that software product developers will
increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and
competitors in Red Brick's industry segment grows and the functionality of
products in different industry segments overlaps. Any such claims, with or
without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause
product shipment delays or require Red Brick to enter into royalty or licensing
agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be
available on terms acceptable to Red Brick or at all, which could have a
material adverse effect upon Red Brick's business, operating results and
financial condition.
Red Brick relies upon certain software that it licenses from third parties,
including software that is integrated with Red Brick's internally developed
software and used in Red Brick Warehouse and Red Brick Formation to perform key
functions. There can be no assurance that these third-party software licenses
will continue to be available to Red Brick on commercially reasonable terms. The
loss of, or inability to maintain, any such software licenses could result in
delays or reductions of shipments until equivalent software could be developed,
identified, licensed and integrated, which would materially adversely affect Red
Brick's business, operating results and financial condition.
EMPLOYEES
As of September 30, 1998, Red Brick had a total of 272 employees, of which
253 were based in the United States, 5 were based in the United Kingdom, 3 were
based in Canada, and 11 were based in Japan. Of the total, 94 were engaged in
sales and marketing, 77 were in research and development, 48 were in customer
service organizations, and 36 were in finance, administration, and operations.
As noted above, there has been transition in Red Brick's sales and marketing
management, as well as significant turnover in the direct sales force and
product development department. This transition may have an adverse effect on
Red Brick's operating results for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1998. Red
Brick's future performance depends in significant part upon the continued
service of its key technical, sales and senior management personnel, none of
whom is bound by an employment agreement. The loss of the services of one or
more of Red Brick's key employees could have a material adverse effect on Red
Brick's business, operating results, and financial condition. Red Brick's future
success also depends on its continuing ability to attract, train, and retain
highly qualified technical, sales, and managerial personnel. Competition for
such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that Red Brick can
retain its key technical, sales, and managerial employees or that it can
attract, assimilate, or retain other highly qualified technical, sales, and
managerial personnel in the future. None of Red Brick's employees is represented
by a labor union. Red Brick has not experienced any work stoppages and considers
its relations with its employees to be good.
PROPERTIES
Red Brick's principal administrative, sales, marketing, support, and
research and development facility is located in Los Gatos, California. Red Brick
has operating leases for this office space totaling approximately 56,000 square
feet that expires in December 2002. Red Brick believes that suitable additional
or alternative space will be available in the future on commercially reasonable
terms as needed. Red Brick has an additional research and development facility
of approximately 8,500 square feet in Andover, Massachusetts. The lease on this
facility expires in July 2002. Red Brick currently leases other domestic sales
offices throughout the United States, as well as international offices in the
United Kingdom and Japan.
156
<PAGE>
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On March 25, 1998, certain Red Brick stockholders acting on behalf of
themselves and other persons who purchased Red Brick's common stock between
January 15, 1997 and April 15, 1997, filed two purported class action lawsuits
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On
May 28, 1998, the Court consolidated the two lawsuits into one action. On
September 2, 1998, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Class Action Complaint for
the consolidated action (the "Amended Complaint"). The Amended Complaint names
as defendants, among others, Red Brick and certain of its present and former
officers and directors. The complaint alleges violations of the federal
securities laws and seeks unspecified monetary damages. Red Brick believes that
the Amended Complaint is without merit and, on October 7, 1998, Red Brick filed
a motion to dismiss the complaint. A hearing on the motion to dismiss is
tentatively scheduled for December 15, 1998. The pending litigation against Red
Brick, and any future litigation against Red Brick or its employees, may result
in substantial costs and expenses to Red Brick, even if Red Brick prevails in
its case or settles the litigation. Such costs may include a significant
diversion of time and effort by Red Brick's technical and management personnel.
Red Brick could be materially and adversely affected by an unfavorable
resolution of such litigation. Depending on their breadth and timing, pending
litigation and any future litigation against Red Brick could materially
adversely affect Red Brick's business, future results of operation, cash flows,
or financial condition.
Other than the events disclosed above, there are no pending material legal
proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business,
to which Red Brick or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of
their property is the subject.
157
<PAGE>
RED BRICK MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THE DISCUSSION IN THIS SECTION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT
INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES REGARDING RED BRICK'S REVENUES AND ASSOCIATED
COSTS AND EXPENSES. RED BRICK'S ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM
THOSE DISCUSSED HEREIN. FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SUCH
DIFFERENCES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE DISCUSSED IN THE SECTION
ENTITLED "RISK FACTORS--RISKS RELATING TO RED BRICK," AS WELL AS THOSE RISKS
DISCUSSED IN THIS SECTION AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS.
OVERVIEW
Red Brick designs, develops, markets and supports Red Brick Warehouse, a
high-performance, client/ server relational database management system ("RDBMS")
that is specifically designed for data warehouse applications, and Red Brick
Formation, an Extraction, Transformation, Movement and Loading ("ETML") tool
used by customers to take data from transaction processing and legacy data
sources and prepare it for use in a data warehouse. Red Brick was founded in
July 1986 as a consulting company to address the issues associated with gaining
access to large data stores. During the period from inception to late 1989, Red
Brick developed various tools and technologies intended to address these issues.
In late 1989, Red Brick began to develop technology for a new RDBMS focused on
decision support and data warehouse applications. Red Brick made its initial
product shipments of Red Brick Warehouse in December 1991. Since that time, Red
Brick has released new versions of Red Brick Warehouse periodically, as well as
administration tools that are sold as options to Red Brick Warehouse. Red
Brick's administration tools assist IT professionals and business managers
within organizations to implement their data warehouse applications effectively.
Red Brick also made initial shipments of a second major product, Red Brick
Formation, in September 1998.
At September 30, 1998, Red Brick had an accumulated deficit of $41.5
million. There can be no assurance that Red Brick will be profitable on a
quarterly basis or achieve profitability on an annual basis. Red Brick's limited
operating history makes the prediction of future operating results difficult.
Although Red Brick experienced significant percentage growth in revenues during
certain periods in the past, Red Brick does not believe prior percentage growth
rates are sustainable or indicative of future operating results.
Substantially all of Red Brick's historical revenues have been attributable
to sales of licenses of Red Brick Warehouse and the related maintenance and
service contracts. This product is currently expected to account for a
significant part of Red Brick's revenues for the foreseeable future. A decline
in demand for or failure to achieve broad market acceptance of Red Brick
Warehouse as a result of competition, technological change or otherwise, would
have a material adverse effect on the business, operating results, and financial
condition of Red Brick. A decline in sales of Red Brick Warehouse would also
have a material adverse effect on sales of other Red Brick products that may be
sold to Red Brick customers. Red Brick's future financial performance will
depend in part on the successful development, introduction, and customer
acceptance of new and enhanced versions of Red Brick Warehouse and other
products. There can be no assurance that Red Brick will continue to be
successful in marketing Red Brick Warehouse or any new or enhanced products.
Red Brick believes that a preference for integrated platforms and solutions
is emerging among data warehouse customers. As the data warehousing market
continues to develop and expand, it has attracted many vendors to enter the
market. Red Brick believes this proliferation of vendors and products seems to
be elongating the sales cycle and complicating the customer's decision process
regarding the implementation and maintenance of data warehousing products. Red
Brick believes that, based on its market analysis, customers want a fully
integrated data warehousing solution that provides customers the ability to
cleanse and transform data, load data into the warehouse and perform decision
support analysis on the data in the warehouse.
158
<PAGE>
In order to address this perceived market shift, Red Brick acquired certain
in-process technology from Engage, a subsidiary of CMGI, in August 1997. This
technology provides Red Brick with the technological base necessary to develop a
fully integrated data warehouse platform. In the third quarter of 1997, Red
Brick took a charge of approximately $11.0 million for in-process technology,
based upon an independent appraisal. Subsequent to the acquisition of this
technology, Red Brick invested approximately $5.2 million to develop Red Brick
Formation, which was derived from the technology acquired in the third quarter
of 1997 and was released in September 1998. The purchased in-process technology
will be used for additional future development efforts aimed at extending Red
Brick's integrated data warehouse platform. Red Brick has directed its marketing
efforts towards positioning Red Brick as a leading provider of an end-to-end
data warehouse platform that Red Brick calls DecisionScape.
Red Brick's future success depends on its ability to enhance its current
products, to develop and introduce new products that keep pace with
technological developments and emerging industry standards on a timely basis, to
successfully market and license such products, and to address the increasingly
sophisticated needs of its customers. Red Brick Formation is a new product in
its first commercial version, and it has not yet proved that it meets customer
requirements or that it is sufficient in terms of functionality, performance, or
reliability to be generally salable and to contribute in a material way to Red
Brick's revenues. The partial or complete failure of Red Brick to achieve these
product development and marketing goals, or of Red Brick Formation to operate as
expected, would have a material adverse effect on Red Brick's business,
operating results, and financial condition.
Red Brick believes that its products are priced competitively with most of
its competitors' products. Intense competition in the database market in which
Red Brick competes may put pressure on Red Brick to reduce prices on certain
products, particularly where certain vendors offer significant discounts in an
effort to recapture or gain market share. In addition, the bundling of software
products for promotional purposes or as a long-term pricing strategy by certain
of Red Brick's competitors could have the effect over time of significantly
reducing the prices that Red Brick can charge for its products. Any such price
reductions could have a material adverse effect on Red Brick's business, results
of operations or financial condition if Red Brick cannot offset these price
reductions with a corresponding increase in sales volumes.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND 1997
REVENUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 CHANGE 1997
--------- ----------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Software license........................................... $ 11,860 (38%) $ 19,189
Percentage of total revenues............................... 47% 67%
Maintenance and service.................................... $ 13,296 41% $ 9,434
Percentage of total revenues............................... 53% 33%
Total revenues............................................. $ 25,156 (12%) $ 28,623
</TABLE>
Red Brick's revenues are derived from (i) license fees for its software
products and (ii) fees for services complementing its products, including
software maintenance and support, training, consulting and development
agreements. Fees for service revenues are charged separately from Red Brick's
software products. Through December 31, 1997, Red Brick recognized revenue in
accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement
of Position ("SOP") No. 91-1, "Software Revenue Recognition." In 1997, the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued SOP No. 97-2,
"Software Revenue Recognition," which is effective for Red Brick beginning in
fiscal 1998. In October 1997, the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants issued Statement of Position No. 97-2, "Software Revenue
Recognition" ("SOP 97-2"), which superseded SOP 91-1 and provides guidance on
159
<PAGE>
generally accepted accounting principles for recognizing revenue on software
transactions. SOP 97-2 requires that revenue recognized from software
arrangements be allocated to each element of the arrangement based on the
relative fair values of the elements, such as software products, upgrades,
enhancements, post contract customer support, installation, or training. Under
SOP 97-2, the determination of fair value is based on objective evidence which
is specific to the vendor. If such evidence of fair value for each element of
the arrangement does not exist, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred
until such time that evidence of fair value does exist or until all elements of
the arrangement are delivered. SOP 97-2 was amended in February 1998 by
Statement of Position 98-4 ("SOP 98-4") "Deferral of the Effective Date of a
Provision of SOP 97-2" which deferred for one year the specification of what was
considered vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for the various
elements in a multiple element arrangement. Red Brick has adopted the provisions
of these SOPs as of January 1, 1998.
SOFTWARE LICENSE REVENUES. Red Brick currently derives substantially all of
its software license revenues from licenses of Red Brick Warehouse, a relational
database management system that is specifically designed for enabling data
warehouse applications. Software license revenues decreased for the nine month
period ended September 30, 1998, compared to the nine month period ended
September 30, 1997, primarily because of the decline in sales in the U.S. market
due to the increased competition in this market. International sales, which have
lower average selling prices, increased, especially in Japan. Average selling
prices in 1998 decreased from the average selling prices in 1997.
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE REVENUES. The growth in maintenance and service
revenues for the nine month periods ended September 30, 1998, compared to the
same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to the renewal of
maintenance contracts and additional professional services engagements. Due to
reduced license sales in the U.S., which are a primary factor in generating
consulting and service revenue, Red Brick anticipates that prior growth rates of
Red Brick's maintenance and service revenues and margins may not be sustainable
in the future.
For the nine month periods ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, there were no
sales to any one customer that accounted for 10% or more of total revenues
during such respective periods. However, Red Brick expects that licenses of its
products to a limited number of customers and resellers may continue to account
for a significant percentage of revenue for the foreseeable future. There can be
no assurance that any customer or reseller will continue to license Red Brick's
products. The loss of a major customer or reseller or any reduction in orders by
such customers or resellers, including reductions due to market or competitive
conditions, could have a material adverse effect on Red Brick's business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
Red Brick's international revenues for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 1998 and 1997, were 17% and 14% of total revenues, respectively.
In the third quarter of 1998, Red Brick reduced its controlling interest in its
Australasia subsidiary to approximately ten percent of the subsidiary's
outstanding capital stock. Accordingly, Red Brick will no longer consolidate the
financial results of this subsidiary. RBA's revenues for the nine month periods
ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, which were consolidated with Red Brick's
financial statements, were 2% of total revenues during such respective periods.
160
<PAGE>
COST OF REVENUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
-----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 CHANGE 1997
--------- ------------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Software license................................................. $ 1,457 28% $ 1,139
Percentage of total revenues..................................... 6% 4%
Maintenance and service.......................................... $ 7,616 24% $ 6,164
Percentage of total revenues..................................... 30% 22%
Total cost of revenues........................................... $ 9,073 24% $ 7,303
Percentage of total revenues..................................... 36% 26%
</TABLE>
COST OF SOFTWARE LICENSE REVENUES. Cost of software license revenues
consisted primarily of the cost of royalties paid to third-party vendors,
product media and duplication, shipping expenses, manuals and packaging
materials. Cost of software license revenues increased for the nine month period
ended September 30, 1998 compared to the same period ended September 30, 1997,
primarily due to increases in cost of royalties related to minimum royalty
obligations.
COST OF MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE REVENUES. Cost of maintenance and service
revenues consisted primarily of personnel-related costs incurred in providing
support, consulting services and training to customers. Cost of maintenance and
service revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998, increased
over such costs for the same period ended September 30, 1997, as a result of
increased personnel-related costs as Red Brick continued to expand its customer
service and consulting organizations.
OPERATING EXPENSES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
-------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 CHANGE 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and marketing....................................... $ 19,061 (4%) $ 19,813
Percentage of total revenues.............................. 76% 69%
Research and development.................................. $ 9,503 33% $ 7,130
Percentage of total revenues.............................. 38% 25%
General and administrative................................ $ 3,104 3% $ 3,019
Percentage of total revenues.............................. 12% 11%
In-process technology..................................... $ -- * $ 10,984
Percentage of total revenues.............................. * 38%
Total operating expenses.................................. $ 31,668 (23%) $ 40,946
Percentage of total revenues.............................. 126% 143%
</TABLE>
-------------------------------
* Not meaningful
SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses consisted primarily of
personnel-related costs, including sales commissions, as well as promotional
expenses including advertising, public relations, seminars, and trade shows.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased for the nine month period ended September
30, 1998, compared to the same period ended September 30, 1997, mainly due to
personnel attrition which resulted in decreases in personnel-related costs.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expenses consisted
primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, and depreciation of
development equipment. The increase in research
161
<PAGE>
and development expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998,
from the same period ended September 30, 1997, was primarily attributable to the
increased staffing of software engineers required to expand and enhance Red
Brick's product line, work on the development of the in-process technology
acquired, and the expensing of technology and software that had not met
technological feasibility. In accordance with SFAS No. 86, Red Brick capitalizes
eligible computer software costs upon the achievement of technological
feasibility, subject to net realizable value considerations. Red Brick has
defined technological feasibility as completion of a working model. As of
September 30, 1998, such capitalizable costs were insignificant. Accordingly,
Red Brick has charged all such costs to research and development expense in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Red Brick believes
that research and development expenses may continue to increase in dollar amount
and may increase as a percentage of total revenues in the future as Red Brick
continues to work on the in-process technology acquired from Engage and to
update and expand its product line.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses consisted
primarily of personnel costs for finance and general management, as well as
insurance and professional expenses. General and administrative expenses
increased for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998, compared to the
nine month period ended September 30, 1997. This increase was primarily due to
increased legal fees primarily related to shareholder litigation. Red Brick
believes that general and administrative expenses may increase in dollar amount
and may increase as a percentage of total revenues.
IN-PROCESS TECHNOLOGY. On August 29, 1997, Red Brick executed a technology
purchase agreement with CMGI and Engage whereby Red Brick acquired the source
code and related documentation to the Engage software technology "Engage.Fusion"
and "Engage.Discover," and such products' shared, object-oriented, metadata
facility, all of which were then technology under development. In the third
quarter of 1997 Red Brick recorded a charge of approximately $11.0 million for
in-process technology based upon independent appraisal. Red Brick paid CMGI $9.5
million in cash and issued to CMGI 238,160 shares of unregistered common stock.
As of the time of its acquisition, the acquired technology had not yet reached
technological feasibility and did not have alternative future uses.
In September 1998, Red Brick made the first customer shipments of a new
product called Red Brick Formation, which is an ETML tool. Red Brick Formation
is the first product that Red Brick has delivered to market derived from the
technology it acquired from Engage. Subsequent to the acquisition of this
technology, Red Brick invested approximately $5.2 million to develop Red Brick
Formation. Red Brick Formation is a new product in its first commercial version,
and it has not yet proved that it meets customer requirements or that it is
sufficient in terms of functionality, performance or reliability to be generally
salable and to contribute in a material way to Red Brick's revenues. Failure of
the Red Brick Formation product to operate as expected, or failure of Red Brick
to successfully market and license the product, could have a material adverse
effect on Red Brick's business, operating results, and financial condition.
Additionally, Red Brick is still working on its development plan for the
"Engage.Discover" portion of the acquired technology. Red Brick estimates that
significant additional investment will be required to complete this in-process
research and development.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME, NET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 CHANGE 1997
--------- ----------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest and other income, net.................................. $ 992 (29%) $ 1,398
Percentage of total revenues.................................... 4% 5%
</TABLE>
Interest and other income, net, primarily represented interest income earned
on Red Brick's cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. Interest and
other income, net, decreased during the nine
162
<PAGE>
month period ended September 30, 1998 compared to the year earlier period
primarily because of the decrease in cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
-----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 CHANGE 1997
--------- ------------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Provision for income taxes........................................... $ 413 35% $ 305
</TABLE>
The income tax provisions for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and
1997, of $413,000 and $305,000, respectively, are attributable to current income
taxes, and consist principally of foreign withholding taxes and other foreign
income taxes and state minimum taxes. No income tax benefits have been
recognized for the losses incurred in the first nine months of 1998 and 1997.
As of December 31, 1997, Red Brick had federal and state net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $12.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively, and
federal and state research credit carryforwards of $650,000 and $450,000,
respectively. Utilization of approximately $1.5 million of the net operating
loss carryforwards is limited to approximately $100,000 per year, due to the
ownership change provisions provided by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and similar
state provisions. These carryforwards will expire from 1999 to 2012.
MINORITY INTEREST, NET LOSS AND NET LOSS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
-----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 CHANGE 1997
---------- ----------- ----------
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Minority interest........................................ $ -- * $ 96
Percentage of total revenues............................. * *
Net loss................................................. $ (15,006) (19%) $ (18,437)
Percentage of total revenues............................. (60%) (64%)
Basic loss per share..................................... $ (1.20) (25%) $ (1.61)
Diluted loss per share................................... $ (1.20) (25%) $ (1.61)
</TABLE>
-------------------------------
* Not meaningful
Net loss per share for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 was
primarily the result of the revenue shortfall for the nine months ended
September 30, 1998. Software license revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 1998, decreased from the year earlier period. As noted in "Risks
Relating to Red Brick" above, the Company's expense levels are relatively fixed
and are based, in part, on expectations regarding future revenues.
163
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
REVENUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
1997 CHANGE 1996 CHANGE 1995
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Software license.................................... $ 29,234 0% $ 29,242 86% $ 15,742
Percentage of total revenues........................ 67% 81% 76%
Maintenance and service............................. $ 14,081 107% $ 6,793 40% $ 4,863
Percentage of total revenues........................ 33% 19% 24%
Total revenues...................................... $ 43,315 20% $ 36,035 75% $ 20,605
</TABLE>
SOFTWARE LICENSE REVENUES. Red Brick derived substantially all of its
software license revenues from licenses of Red Brick Warehouse, a relational
database management system that is specifically designed for enabling data
warehouse applications, and prior to 1998 had an average selling price in excess
of $150,000. Software license revenues were flat from 1996 to 1997. Red Brick's
software license revenue in the first quarter of 1997 was significantly less
than financial analysts' expectations when license revenue declined 31% for the
quarter ended March 31, 1997, from that of the same period in the prior year and
declined 56% from the sequential quarter. Software license revenue increased
over the comparable period in the prior year 15% and 11% for the quarters ended
June 30, 1997 and September 30, 1997, respectively and was flat for the quarter
ended December 31, 1997. In both the second and third quarters of 1997, one
customer accounted for 16% and 12% of total revenue for the quarter,
respectively. In the fourth quarter of 1997, two transactions accounted for 43%
of the software license revenue. There can be no assurance that Red Brick will
continue to receive such significant customer orders in the future.
The increase in software license revenue in 1996 from 1995 was primarily
attributable to an increase in the number of units sold.
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE REVENUES. The growth in maintenance and service
revenues in 1997 and 1996 was primarily attributable to the renewal of
maintenance contracts after the initial one-year term and additional
professional services engagements. Following an investment in its consulting
staff and consulting capabilities, Red Brick also received several significant
consulting assignments during 1997.
For the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, sales to no one customer
accounted for more than 10% of total revenues. For the year ended December 31,
1995, sales to one customer accounted for 21% of total revenues.
Red Brick's international revenues for the years ended December 31, 1997,
1996, and 1995, were 17%, 10%, and 8% of total revenues, respectively.
COST OF REVENUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
1997 CHANGE 1996 CHANGE 1995
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Software license.............................. $ 1,503 32% $ 1,136 66% $ 685
Percentage of total revenues.................. 3% 3% 3%
Maintenance and service....................... $ 8,438 151% $ 3,357 108% $ 1,615
Percentage of total revenues.................. 19% 9% 8%
Total cost of revenues........................ $ 9,941 121% $ 4,493 95% $ 2,300
Percentage of total revenues.................. 23% 12% 11%
</TABLE>
164
<PAGE>
COST OF SOFTWARE LICENSE REVENUES. The increase in cost of software
licenses in 1997 over 1996 was primarily related to increased shipping costs as
Red Brick expanded internationally, increased printing and duplication costs as
its products become more complex to include more functionality and were ported
to more operating systems, and royalties to third parties related to increased
sales of the data mining products. These increases in cost of software licenses
were partially offset by decreases in the amount of royalties Red Brick paid to
Sybase in 1997 due to the termination of the license agreement. The increase in
cost of software license revenues in 1996 over 1995 reflected the higher volume
of product shipped.
COST OF MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE REVENUES. Cost of maintenance and service
revenues has increased each year from the year ended December 31, 1995 through
the year ended December 31, 1997 as a result of increased personnel-related
costs as Red Brick continued to expand its customer service organizations to
support the increase in service revenue.
OPERATING EXPENSES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
1997 CHANGE 1996 CHANGE 1995
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and marketing........................................... $ 26,955 32% $ 20,410 85% $ 11,011
Percentage of total revenues.................................. 62% 57% 53%
Research and development...................................... $ 9,960 59% $ 6,256 24% $ 5,033
Percentage of total revenues.................................. 23% 17% 24%
General and administrative.................................... $ 4,192 48% $ 2,839 69% $ 1,682
Percentage of total revenues.................................. 10% 8% 8%
In-process technology......................................... $ 10,984 * $ 500 * $ --
Percentage of total revenues.................................. 25% 1% *
Total operating expenses...................................... $ 52,091 74% $ 30,005 69% $ 17,726
Percentage of total revenues.................................. 120% 83% 86%
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Not meaningful
SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses increased in 1997 over
1996 primarily due to increased staffing of Red Brick's sales and marketing
operations, costs associated with the infrastructure of Red Brick, educational
seminars to generate leads, and design and other fees related to Red Brick's
efforts to reposition itself as a leading provider of an integrated
high-performance end-to-end data warehouse solution. The 1996 over 1995 increase
in sales and marketing expenses was primarily due to the expansion of Red
Brick's sales operations and increased marketing activities, including
promotional expenses.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. The increase in research and development expenses
in 1997 over 1996 was primarily attributable to the increased staffing of
software engineers and the purchase of software licenses required to expand and
enhance Red Brick's product line. The increase in 1996 over 1995 research and
development expenses was primarily related to increased staffing of software
engineers.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. The increase in general and administrative
expenses in 1997 and 1996 over the prior years was primarily attributable to
increased staffing and professional fees necessary to manage and support Red
Brick.
IN-PROCESS TECHNOLOGY. On August 29, 1997, Red Brick executed a technology
purchase agreement with CMGI and Engage whereby Red Brick acquired the source
code and related documentation to the Engage software technology "Engage.Fusion"
and "Engage.Discover," and such products' shared, object-oriented, metadata
facility, all of which are currently technology under development. In the third
quarter of 1997 Red Brick recorded a charge of approximately $11.0 million for
in-process technology based upon
165
<PAGE>
an independent appraisal. Red Brick paid CMGI $9.5 million in cash and issued to
CMGI 238,160 shares of unregistered common stock. As of the time of its
acquisition, the acquired technology had not yet reached technological
feasibility and did not have alternative future uses.
In the second quarter of 1996 Red Brick acquired in-process technology
associated with a $500,000 licensing arrangement. At the time of acquisition,
the acquired in-process technology had not yet reached technological feasibility
and did not have alternative future uses.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
1997 CHANGE 1996 CHANGE 1995
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest and other income (expense), net.......................... $ 1,767 17% $ 1,509 * $ (128)
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Not meaningful
Interest and other income for 1997, 1996 and 1995 was $1.9 million, $1.7
million and $94,000, respectively. The increase in interest and other income in
1997 from 1996 primarily relates to compounding of interest on higher cash and
investments balances throughout the year prior to the use of cash to purchase
certain assets and technology from Engage. Interest and other income increased
during 1996 due to the investment of the proceeds received from Red Brick's
initial public offering. Interest and other expense for 1997, 1996 and 1995 was
$124,000, $234,000 and $222,000, respectively. The decrease in interest and
other expense in 1997 over 1996 was primarily due to paying down capital lease
lines.
Red Brick has experienced virtually no gains or losses on foreign currency
translation since substantially all of its international sales to date have been
billed and collected in U.S. dollars. Red Brick pays the expenses of its
international operations in local currencies and does not engage in hedging
transactions with respect to such obligations.
PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
1997 CHANGE 1996 CHANGE 1995
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes........................... $ 1,203 * $ (687) * $ 143
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Not meaningful
The 1997 income tax provision of $1.2 million included approximately
$203,000 in current income taxes, consisting principally of foreign withholding
taxes and other foreign income taxes, and a $1.0 million deferred tax provision
to establish a valuation allowance with respect to the net deferred tax assets.
The 1996 income tax benefit reflected the original recognition of the $1.0
million in deferred tax assets. Red Brick has provided a full valuation
allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 1997 due to
uncertainties surrounding its realization.
After adjusting for the deferred tax assets, the tax provisions recorded in
1997, 1996 and 1995 have primarily consisted of foreign withholding taxes,
current foreign income taxes and domestic minimum taxes.
As of December 31, 1997, Red Brick had federal and state net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $12.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively, and
federal and state research credit carryforwards of $650,000 and $450,000,
respectively. Utilization of approximately $1.5 million of the net operating
166
<PAGE>
loss carryforwards is limited to approximately $100,000 per year, due to the
ownership change provisions provided by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and similar
state provisions. These carryforwards will expire from 1999 through 2012.
MINORITY INTEREST, NET INCOME (LOSS), AND EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
1997 CHANGE 1996 CHANGE 1995
----------- ------ ------ ------ -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE
AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Minority Interest............. $ 130 53% $ 85 * $--
Percentage of total
revenues.................... * * *
Net income (loss)............. $ (18,023) * $3,818 1,140% $ 308
Percentage of total
revenues.................... (42%) 11% 1%
Basic earnings (loss) per
share....................... $ (1.55) * $ 0.37 68% $0.22
Diluted earnings (loss) per
share....................... $ (1.55) * $ 0.30 650% $0.04
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Not meaningful
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
SEPTEMBER ----------------
30, 1998 1997 1996
------------ ------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Working capital............... $11,681 26,132 $40,308
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments...... 17,132 26,909 35,151
</TABLE>
Working capital decreased at September 30, 1998 compared to that at December
31, 1997, primarily due to a decrease in cash, short-term investments and
accounts receivable. Working capital decreased at December 31, 1997 from that at
December 31, 1996 primarily due to decreases in cash related to the acquisition
of in-process technology and other assets from CMGI, and increases in deferred
revenue and accrued expenses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------- --------------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities.............. $ (8,512) $ 1,549 $ 1,083 $ (158) $ 796
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities.............. 2,336 (3,760) (5,338) (22,357) (112)
Cash provided by financing activities........................ 1,175 2,127 2,061 34,069 356
</TABLE>
For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, net cash used in operating
activities resulted primarily from the net loss adjusted for non-cash items
partially offset by the decrease in accounts receivable. For the nine months
ended September 30, 1997, net cash provided by operating activities resulted
primarily from decreases in accounts receivable and increases in accrued
expenses and compensation, accounts payable, and deferred revenue, partially
offset by the net loss adjusted for non-cash items including the in-process
technology. For the year ended December 31, 1997, net cash provided by operating
activities resulted primarily from an increase in deferred revenue, partially
offset by the net loss adjusted for non-cash items, including the in-process
technology. For the year ended December 31, 1996, net cash used in operating
activities resulted primarily from an increase in accounts receivable and
deferred tax asset partially offset by increases in accrued expenses and
compensation and deferred revenue, and by net income adjusted for non-cash
items. For the year ended December 31, 1995, net cash provided by operations was
primarily from net income adjusted for non-cash items and increases in accrued
expenses and compensation, deferred revenue, and accounts payable partially
offset by an increase in accounts receivable. In addition, the Company agreed to
pay to Engage minimum nonrefundable royalties of $3.1 million in connection with
the parties' cross-licensing agreement, of which $1.5 million has been paid as
of October 30, 1998.
167
<PAGE>
For the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, Red Brick's investing
activities consisted of net sales of investment grade, interest-bearing
securities, offset by purchases of property and equipment. For the year ended
December 31, 1997, Red Brick's investing activities consisted of the acquisition
of certain assets and in-process technology and purchases of property and
equipment, offset by net sales of investment grade, interest-bearing securities.
For the year ended December 31, 1996, Red Brick's investing activities consisted
of net purchases of investment grade, interest-bearing securities, as well as
purchases of property and equipment. Red Brick's 1995 investing activities
consisted primarily of purchases of property and equipment. Red Brick's
principal commitments consist primarily of leases on facilities and equipment.
Capital expenditures were $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
1998, compared to $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 1997. For
the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, capital expenditures were $1.7
million, $1.7 million and $85,000, respectively.
The cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended
September 30, 1998 and 1997, was primarily from the issuance of common stock
through Red Brick's employee stock purchase plan and stock option plans,
partially offset by principal payments on capital lease obligations. The cash
provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 1997, was
primarily from the issuance of common stock partially offset by principal
payments on capital lease obligations. The cash provided by financing activities
during the year ended December 31, 1996, was primarily from the initial public
offering in January 1996. The cash provided by financing activities during the
year ended December 31, 1995, was primarily from the sale of preferred and
common stock, partially offset by principal payments made on capital lease
obligations.
Red Brick has experienced a reduction in license revenues, continued losses
from operations and substantial cash used in operating activities. Red Brick's
future success depends on its ability to enhance its current products, to
develop and introduce new products that keep pace with technological
developments and emerging industry standards on a timely basis and to
successfully market and license such products. Red Brick believes that its
current cash and investment balances are sufficient to meet anticipated working
capital and capital expenditure requirements through at least December 31, 1998.
Thereafter, Red Brick's ability to meet its goals above will depend upon the
ability of management to raise additional capital to fund operations, increase
revenues by introducing new products and increasing marketing efforts, and
reduce spending. Red Brick may not be able to raise additional capital, increase
revenues or reduce spending. Red Brick's inability to raise additional capital,
increase revenues or reduce spending would have a material adverse affect on Red
Brick's financial condition and results of operations.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Red Brick is aware of the issues associated with existing computer systems
as the Year 2000 approaches. Year 2000 issues are pervasive and complex, as
virtually every computer operation will be affected in some way by the rollover
of the two-digit year value to 00. The question is whether computer systems will
properly recognize date sensitive information when the year changes to 2000.
Systems that do not properly recognize such information could generate erroneous
data or cause a system to fail. In 1996, Red Brick began a complete Year 2000
compliance review for all products then shipping. Red Brick has extended this
review to new products developed and released since that time. Red Brick also
extended this review to the in-process technology acquired in 1997 from Engage
and the SQL-Backtrack for Red Brick Warehouse product that was co-developed with
a third party.
Red Brick defines Year 2000 compliance for its products as follows:
- INTERNAL FORMATS: Products store and manage all dates internally in full
four-digit year format;
- CALCULATIONS AND CONVERSIONS: Date calculations are performed correctly.
All operations are performed on whole dates, and conversions between
internal formats and external representations are implemented correctly.
No date value can cause improper operation. Year 2000 is recognized as a
leap year;
168
<PAGE>
- IMPLICIT CENTURY REPRESENTATION: All product features and interfaces have
explicit mechanisms to indicate unambiguously how to interpret two-digit
years; and
- USER INTERFACES: When displayed in a user interface, dates are presented
with four digits.
Red Brick's internal review established that all Red Brick products on all
supported platforms are Year 2000 compliant by design. This compliance has been
confirmed by appropriate testing. Red Brick has incorporated ongoing testing for
compliance into Red Brick's standard test suites used to qualify new or updated
product releases before shipment. Red Brick regularly provides formal statements
of compliance to existing and prospective customers.
Despite design review and ongoing testing, Red Brick's products may contain
undetected errors or defects associated with Year 2000 date handling. Known or
unknown errors or defects in Red Brick's products could result in:
- Delay or loss of revenue;
- Diversion of development resources;
- Damage to reputation; and
- Increased service and warranty costs.
Any of the above conditions could materially adversely affect Red Brick's
business, operating results or financial condition. Some commentators have
stated that a significant amount of litigation will arise out of Year 2000
compliance issues. Because of the unprecedented nature of such litigation, Red
Brick is uncertain whether or to what extent it may be affected by such issues.
Year 2000 issues may also affect the computer systems used internally by Red
Brick to manage and operate its business. Red Brick recently completed assessing
its current systems and working with its software vendors to confirm that
systems purchased by Red Brick are prepared for Year 2000 issues. Red Brick is
not currently aware of any material costs or operational issues associated with
Year 2000 issues affecting internal systems. Red Brick does not believe that it
will incur significant operating expenses or be required to invest heavily in
computer systems improvements to be Year 2000 compliant. Specifically, Red Brick
estimates such costs will not exceed $60,000, of which $46,000 has been spent
through November 4, 1998. However, Red Brick may experience significant
unanticipated problems and costs caused by undetected errors or defects in
internal systems. The worst-case scenario if such problems occur would be Red
Brick's inability to ship products and record revenue. Red Brick does not
currently have any information concerning the Year 2000 compliance status of its
customers or prospective customers. If current or future customers fail to
achieve Year 2000 compliance or if they divert technology expenditures
(especially technology expenditures that were reserved for data
warehousing-related software and services) to address Year 2000 compliance
issues, Red Brick's business, results of operation, or financial condition could
be materially adversely affected.
Red Brick has funded its Year 2000 activities from available cash and has
not separately accounted for these costs in the past. To date, these costs have
not been material. Red Brick will incur additional costs for administrative,
customer support, internal IT, and product engineering activities to address
ongoing internal and product-related Year 2000 issues. In addition, Red Brick
may experience problems and costs with Year 2000 compliance that could
materially adversely affect its business, results of operations, and financial
condition. Red Brick has not yet fully developed a contingency plan to address
situations that may result if it is unable to achieve Year 2000 readiness of
critical operations. The cost of developing and implementing such a plan may
itself be material. Finally, Red Brick is also subject to external forces that
might generally affect industry and commerce, such as utility or transportation
company Year 2000 compliance failures and related service interruptions.
169
<PAGE>
RED BRICK MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth certain information concerning executive
officers and directors of Red Brick and their ages as of September 30, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ----------------------------------------------------- --- -----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Christopher G. Erickson(1)........................... 50 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board
Phillip M. Fernandez................................. 37 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Kristi L. Smith...................................... 32 Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
Lawrence L. Howard................................... 54 Vice President, North American Sales
Peggy DeLeon......................................... 39 Vice President, Human Resources
Andrew W. Priest..................................... 35 Vice President, Solutions and Services
Ron Barale, Jr....................................... 39 Vice President, Platform Products Group
Paul Rodwick......................................... 35 Vice President, Marketing
Andrew K. Ludwick(2)(3).............................. 51 Director
John F. Shoch(2)(3).................................. 49 Director
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Member of Stock Option Committee
(2) Member of Audit Committee
(3) Member of Compensation Committee
MR. ERICKSON joined Red Brick in February 1993 as President and Chief
Executive Officer and as a director. In September 1995, Mr. Erickson was also
elected Chairman of the Board of Red Brick. From November 1980 to January 1993,
Mr. Erickson was employed by Tandem Computers Incorporated ("Tandem"), a
manufacturer of computers and related products. From 1985 to 1989, as Director
of Software Product Management, he was responsible for the planning and
marketing of Tandem software products, including NonStop SQL(TM), the software
industry's first specialized RDBMS. From 1989 to 1993, Mr. Erickson served as
President of Tandem Telecommunications Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Tandem, and most recently as Vice President and General Manager, Tandem
Telecom Division. Prior to joining Tandem, Mr. Erickson was employed by Wells
Fargo Bank, N.T. & S.A., a banking institution, Burroughs Computer Corporation,
a manufacturer of computers and related products, and Data Point Corporation, a
computer products and services company. Mr. Erickson holds a B.A. in economics
from the University of California, Santa Barbara and an M.B.A. from the
University of California, Berkeley.
MR. FERNANDEZ joined Red Brick in December 1991 as Vice President,
Engineering. In November 1996, Mr. Fernandez was promoted to Senior Vice
President, Products and Services. In July 1998, Mr. Fernandez was promoted to
Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President. From March 1989 to
November 1991, Mr. Fernandez was employed by Metaphor Computer Systems, a
computer software company, most recently as Director, Systems Software
Development. Mr. Fernandez holds a B.A. in history from Stanford University.
MS. SMITH joined Red Brick in February 1998 as Corporate Controller and, in
July 1998, was promoted to Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary. From September 1994 to February 1998, Ms. Smith served as Director of
Planning and Analysis and Assistant Corporate Controller at Sybase, Inc. From
July 1988 to September 1994, Ms. Smith was employed by Arthur Andersen L.L.P.,
most recently as a
170
<PAGE>
Manager. Ms. Smith is a certified public accountant and holds an M.B.A. from the
University of California, Berkeley, and a B.B.A. in Finance from Iowa State
University.
MR. HOWARD joined Red Brick in January 1998 as Vice President, North
American Sales. From January 1996 to January 1998, Mr. Howard was the President
and Chief Executive Officer of OrbitSoft 2000, Inc., a software development
services company. From January 1995 to January 1996, Mr. Howard was employed by
Ascent Logic Corporation, a systems engineering software company, as the General
Manager, C/S Strategic Business Unit. From March 1994 to January 1995, Mr.
Howard was an independent consultant working with various software companies.
From May 1992 to March 1994, Mr. Howard was employed by Unify Corporation, a
client/server software company, as Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing.
Mr. Howard holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Kansas
and an MBA from the University of Florida.
MS. DELEON joined Red Brick in August 1995 as Vice President of Human
Resources. From May 1993 to August 1995, Ms. DeLeon served as Vice President of
Worldwide Human Resources at Spectrum HoloByte. She holds a B.S. in
Organizational Behavior from the University of San Francisco.
MR. PRIEST joined Red Brick in March 1997 as Director of Professional
Services. In July 1998, Mr. Priest was promoted to Vice President, Solutions and
Services. From May 1991 to March 1997, Mr. Priest served in consulting practice
management and account and channel sales at Information Builders, Inc. From July
1988 to May 1991, Mr. Priest managed accounts at Hewlett-Packard Company. Mr.
Priest has also worked at Norden Systems and Litton Guidance and Control Systems
in a software engineering capacity. Mr. Priest holds a B.S. in Computer Science
from State University of New York.
MR. BARALE joined Red Brick in September 1994 as Director, Customer Support.
In October 1997, Mr. Barale was promoted to Vice President, Services and
Support. In July 1998, Mr. Barale was promoted to Vice President, Platform
Products Group. From October 1991 to August 1994, Mr. Barale was Director of
Post-Sales Support at Compuware-Uniface Corporation. Mr. Barale attended San
Jose State University where he majored in Computer Science.
MR. RODWICK joined Red Brick in January 1996 as Senior Director of Product
Management. In July 1998, Mr. Rodwick was promoted to Vice President of
Marketing. From October 1994 to December 1995, Mr. Rodwick was Senior Product
Manager at Sybase, Inc. From February 1992 to October 1994, Mr. Rodwick was
Manager of Product Development and Manager of DIS Products at Metaphor, Inc.
From May 1990 to August 1990, Mr. Rodwick served as Project Coordinator for
Tandem Computer's European Development Lab. Mr. Rodwick holds a B.S. in Computer
Engineering from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
MR. LUDWICK became a director of Red Brick in October 1996. From October
1994 to October 1996, Mr. Ludwick served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Bay Networks, Inc. ("Bay Networks"), created in October 1994 by the
merger of SynOptics Communications, Inc., which he co-founded in July 1985, and
Wellfleet Communications, Inc. Prior to co-founding SynOptics Communications,
Inc., Mr. Ludwick worked for Xerox Corporation, a document management company,
in a variety of positions in marketing, market planning, and sales operations.
Mr. Ludwick serves on the Board of Directors of Bay Networks. Mr. Ludwick holds
a B.A. from Harvard College and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.
DR. SHOCH became a director of Red Brick in October 1989. Since 1985, Dr.
Shoch has been a general partner at Asset Management Company, a venture capital
management firm. From 1971 to 1985, Dr. Shoch was employed by the Xerox
Corporation, a document management company, most recently as President of the
Office Systems Division. Dr. Shoch is also a director of Conductus, Inc., Remedy
Corporation and several private companies. Dr. Shoch holds a B.S. in political
science and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in computer science from Stanford University.
171
<PAGE>
Each director holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or
until his successor is duly elected and qualified. The officers serve at the
discretion of the Red Brick Board. There are no family relationships among the
directors and officers of Red Brick.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The Red Brick Board has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the
Compensation Committee, and the Stock Option Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews, acts on, and reports to the Red Brick Board
with respect to various auditing matters, including the selection of Red Brick's
auditors, the scope of the annual audits, fees to be paid to Red Brick's
auditors, the performance of Red Brick's auditors, and the accounting practices
of Red Brick. The current members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Ludwick and Dr.
Shoch.
The Compensation Committee reviews the performance and sets the compensation
of the Chief Executive Officer of Red Brick, and approves the compensation of
the other executive officers of Red Brick and reviews the compensation programs
for other key employees, including salary and cash bonus levels as recommended
by the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee administers the 1995
Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The current members
of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Ludwick and Dr. Shoch.
The Stock Option Committee approves stock option grants (up to a maximum
number of shares set by the Red Brick Board) to employees and consultants of Red
Brick who are not officers. Mr. Erickson is the sole member of the Stock Option
Committee.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Except for grants of stock options, directors of Red Brick do not receive
compensation for services provided as directors. Red Brick also does not pay
compensation for committee participation or special assignments of the Red Brick
Board.
Non-employee Board members are eligible for option grants pursuant to the
provisions of the Automatic Option Grant Program under Red Brick's 1995 Stock
Option Plan (the "1995 Plan"). Under the Automatic Option Grant Program, each
individual who first becomes a non-employee Board member after the date of Red
Brick's initial public offering will be granted an option to purchase 15,000
shares on the date such individual joins the Red Brick Board, provided such
individual has not been in the prior employ of Red Brick. In addition, at each
annual meeting of stockholders, each individual who continues to serve as a
board member after such annual meeting and has served as a non-employee board
member for at least six months prior to such annual meeting will receive a
non-statutory option grant to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock.
Accordingly, on October 18, 1996, Mr. Ludwick was granted an option to purchase
15,000 shares at an exercise price of $25.25, on May 21, 1997 Mr. Ludwick and
Dr. Shoch were granted an option to purchase 1,000 shares at an exercise price
of $8.625 per share, and on May 15, 1998 Mr. Ludwick and Dr. Shoch were granted
an option to purchase 1,000 shares at an exercise price equal to the fair market
value on that date.
Board members who are also employees of Red Brick are eligible to receive
discretionary options under the 1995 Plan, and employee-directors, other than
Mr. Erickson, are also eligible to participate in Red Brick's 1998 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee of the Red Brick Board was formed in October 1993
and was comprised of Mr. Ludwick and Dr. Shoch. None of these individuals was at
any time during 1997, or at any other time, an officer or employee of Red Brick.
No member of the Compensation Committee of Red
172
<PAGE>
Brick serves as a member of the Red Brick Board or compensation committee of any
entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Red
Brick Board or Compensation Committee.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
The members of the Red Brick Board, the executive officers of Red Brick, and
persons who hold more than 10% of Red Brick's outstanding common stock are
subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which require them to file reports with
respect to their ownership of Red Brick's common stock and their transactions in
such common stock. Based upon (i) the copies of Section 16(a) reports that Red
Brick received from such persons for their fiscal 1997 transactions in the
common stock and their common stock holdings and (ii) the written
representations received from one or more of such persons that no annual Form 5
reports were required to be filed by them for the 1997 fiscal year, Red Brick
believes that all reporting requirements under Section 16(a) for such fiscal
year were met in a timely manner by its executive officers, board members, and
greater than 10% stockholders, except that Dr. Shoch filed late a Form 4 for
November 1997 reporting one transaction.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the compensation earned
by Red Brick's Chief Executive Officer and the three other most highly
compensated executive officers who were serving as such at the end of fiscal
1997, each of whose aggregate compensation for fiscal 1997 exceeded $100,000 for
services rendered in all capacities to Red Brick and its subsidiaries for that
fiscal year, and one other individual who was not serving as an executive
officer at the end of the fiscal year but whose salary and bonus exceeded
$100,000 (collectively, the "Named Officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS
---------------------------------------- ------------- SECURITIES
FISCAL OTHER ANNUAL RESTRICTED UNDERLYING
NAME AND PRESENT PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION(1) STOCK AWARDS OPTIONS
- ------------------------------------------ ----------- ---------- --------- ----------------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Christopher G. Erickson................... 1997 $ 204,750 $ 33,735 $ 4,056 0 40,000
President, Chief Executive Officer 1996 $ 188,750 $ 65,869 $ 5,643 0 0
and Chairman of the Board 1995 $ 170,000 $ 61,520 $ 5,711 110,145 84,956
Phillip M. Fernandez...................... 1997 $ 185,000 $ 99,876 $ 1,365 0 25,000
Executive Vice President 1996 $ 156,820 $ 55,675 $ 2,117 0 0
and Chief Operating Officer 1995 $ 137,280 $ 54,226 $ 2,104 39,652 46,079
Anthony W. Layzell(2)..................... 1997 $ 80,881 $ 46,001 0 0 150,000
Former Sr. Vice President, 1996 --
Sales & Marketing 1995 --
Robert C. Hausmann(3)..................... 1997 $ 120,714 $ 18,113 0 0 25,000
Former Vice President, Finance 1996 $ 133,000 $ 50,757 $ 863 0 0
and Administration, Chief 1995 $ 111,627 $ 44,366 $ 1,204 26,435 34,886
Financial Officer and Secretary
Alexander Wilson(4)....................... 1997 $ 210,756(5) $ 15,000 0 0 35,000
Former Vice President, 1996 $ 223,201(6) $ 46,202 0 0 0
Worldwide Sales 1995 $ 148,693(7) $ 24,000 0 0 0
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Represents imputed interest on outstanding loans.
173
<PAGE>
(2) Mr. Layzell commenced employment on July 15, 1997 and terminated employment
on July 3, 1998.
(3) Mr. Hausmann terminated employment on September 15, 1997.
(4) Mr. Wilson terminated employment on January 7, 1998.
(5) Includes commissions of $70,756.
(6) Includes commissions of $103,201.
(7) Includes commissions of $57,978.
As of the last day of the 1997 fiscal year, the Named Officers held the
number of shares of restricted common stock set forth below. Also, see "Red
Brick Certain Transactions" below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF VALUE OF
NAME UNVESTED SHARES UNVESTED SHARES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Christopher G. Erickson........................................................ 29,831 $ 199,271
Phillip M. Fernandez........................................................... 10,739 $ 71,737
Anthony W. Layzell............................................................. 0 $ 0
Robert C. Hausmann............................................................. 0 $ 0
Alexander Wilson............................................................... 0 $ 0
</TABLE>
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR 1997
The following table contains information concerning the stock option grants
made to each of the Named Officers in the fiscal year ended 1997. No stock
appreciation rights were granted to these individuals during such year.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS(1) POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
-------------------------------------------------------- VALUE AT ASSUMED
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF TOTAL ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK
SECURITIES OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE APPRECIATION
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO OR BASE FOR OPTION TERM(4)
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES IN PRICE EXPIRATION ------------------------
NAME GRANTED(1) 1997(2) ($/SH)(3) DATE 5%($) 10%($)
- ----------------------------------- ----------- ----------------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Christopher G. Erickson............ 40,000 1.80% 6.625 4/18/07 $ 166,657 $ 422,341
Phillip M. Fernandez............... 25,000 1.13% 6.625 4/18/07 104,161 263,964
Anthony W. Layzell................. 100,000 4.50% 8.125 7/16/07 510,977 1,294,916
5,000 0.23% 8.125 7/16/07 25,549 64,746
30,000 1.35% 7.25 11/19/07 136,785 346,639
15,000 0.68% 7.25 11/19/07 68,392 173,320
Robert C. Hausmann................. 25,000 1.13% 6.625 4/18/07 104,161 263,964
Alexander Wilson................... 35,000 1.58% 6.625 4/18/07 145,825 369,549
</TABLE>
(1) Each of the options listed in the table granted to Messrs. Erickson,
Fernandez, Hausmann and Wilson were granted on April 18, 1997 and become
exercisable with respect to 50% of the Option Shares after one year of
service from the grant date and for the balance in 24 equal monthly
installments thereafter. The first two options granted to Mr. Layzell were
granted on July 16, 1997 and the third option was granted on November 19,
1997; each becomes exercisable to the extent of 25% of the shares after one
year from the vesting commencement date and for the balance in 36 equal
monthly installments thereafter. The fourth option was granted on November
19, 1997 and becomes exercisable with respect to 50% of the shares after one
year from the grant date and the remainder in 24 equal monthly installments
thereafter. The plan administrator has the discretionary authority to
reprice the options through the cancellation of those options and the grant
of replacement options with an exercise price based on the fair market value
of the option shares on the regrant date. The options have a maximum term of
10 years measured from the option grant date, subject to earlier termination
174
<PAGE>
in the event of the optionee's cessation of service with Red Brick. Under
each of the options, the option shares will vest upon an acquisition of Red
Brick by merger or asset sale, unless the acquiring entity or its parent
corporation assumes the outstanding options. Any options that are assumed or
replaced in the transaction and do not otherwise accelerate at that time
shall automatically accelerate (and any unvested option shares which do not
otherwise vest at that time shall automatically vest) in the event the
optionee's service terminates by reason of an involuntary or constructive
termination within 12 months following the transaction.
(2) Based on a total of 2,220,650 options granted to employees in 1997.
(3) The exercise price for each option may be paid in cash, in shares of common
stock valued at fair market value on the exercise date or through a cashless
exercise procedure involving a same-day sale of the purchased shares. Red
Brick may also finance the option exercise by loaning the optionee
sufficient funds to pay the exercise price for the purchased shares,
together with any federal and state income tax liability incurred by the
optionee in connection with such exercise.
(4) In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC"), the table sets forth the hypothetical gains or "option spreads"
that would exist for the options at the end of their respective ten-year
terms based on assumed annualized rates of compound stock price appreciation
of 5% and 10% from the dates the options were granted to the end of the
respective option terms. Actual gains, if any, on option exercises are
dependent on the future performance of Red Brick's common stock and overall
market conditions. There can be no assurance provided to any executive
officer or any other holder of Red Brick's securities that the actual stock
price appreciation over the 10-year option term will be at the assumed 5%
and 10% levels or at any other defined level. Unless the market price of the
common stock appreciates over the option term, no value will be realized
from the option grants made to the executive officers.
AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table sets forth information concerning exercises of options
by the Named Officers and option holdings as of the end of fiscal 1997 with
respect to each of the Named Officers. No stock appreciation rights were
exercised during such year or were outstanding at the end of that year.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE- MONEY OPTIONS AT
OPTIONS AT FISCAL FISCAL
SHARES YEAR-END(#) YEAR-END($)(2)
ACQUIRED ON VALUE -------------------------- --------------------------
NAME EXERCISE(#) REALIZED(1) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ------------------------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Christopher G. Erickson........ 325,750 2,079,914 $ 42,478 82,477 $ 27,478 $ 42,477
Phillip M. Fernandez........... 0 0 144,491 48,739 825,081 20,614
Anthony W. Layzell............. 0 0 0 150,000 0 0
Robert C. Hausmann............. 9,818 31,909 0 0 0 0
Alexander Wilson............... 5,000 112,950 26,955 104,607 0 21,843
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Market price at exercise less exercise price.
(2) Market value of underlying securities at fiscal year end, December 31, 1997
($7.00), minus the exercise price.
175
<PAGE>
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
The Compensation Committee of the Red Brick Board, as plan administrator of
the 1995 Plan, has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of the
shares of common stock subject to outstanding options held by the Named Officers
and any other officer or any shares actually held by such individual in
connection with certain changes in control of Red Brick or the subsequent
termination of the officer's employment following the change in control event.
None of Red Brick's executive officers have employment agreements with Red
Brick, and their employment may be terminated at any time.
Red Brick has adopted a severance plan for executive officers that provides
that upon an involuntary termination of an officer's employment, he or she shall
be entitled to six months of salary (one year of salary in the case of the Chief
Executive Officer) and certain benefits and, upon an involuntary termination of
an officer's employment following certain acquisitions or changes in control of
Red Brick, he or she shall be entitled to one year of salary and accelerated
vesting of option shares or restricted stock as if the officer remained employed
for one additional year. See "The Plan of Merger and Related
Transactions--Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger."
LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes a court to
award or a corporation's Board of Directors to grant indemnification to
directors and officers in terms sufficiently broad to permit such
indemnification under certain circumstances for liabilities (including
reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the "1933 Act"). The Registrant's Bylaws provide for mandatory
indemnification of its directors and officers and permissible indemnification of
employees and other agents to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware
General Corporation Law. The Registrant's Certificate of Incorporation provides
that, pursuant to Delaware law, its directors shall not be liable for monetary
damages for breach of their fiduciary duty as directors to the Registrant and
its stockholders. This provision in the Certificate of Incorporation does not
eliminate the fiduciary duty of the directors, and, in appropriate
circumstances, equitable remedies such as injunctive or other forms of non-
monetary relief will remain available under Delaware law. In addition, each
director will continue to be subject to liability for breach of the director's
duty of loyalty to the Registrant for acts or omissions not in good faith or
involving intentional misconduct, for knowing violations of law, for actions
leading to improper personal benefit to the director and for payment of
dividends or approval of stock repurchases or redemptions that are unlawful
under Delaware law. The provision also does not affect a director's
responsibilities under any other law, such as the federal securities laws or
state or federal environmental laws. The Registrant has entered into
Indemnification Agreements with its officers and directors. The Indemnification
Agreements provide the Registrant's officers and directors with further
indemnification to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law.
STOCK PLANS
1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Red Brick 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "1995 Plan") was adopted by the
Red Brick Board on September 20, 1995 as the successor to the 1991 Stock Option
Plan ("1991 Plan"). Red Brick has reserved 2,265,976 shares for issuance under
the 1995 Plan, plus an additional number of shares equal to 5% of the number of
shares of common stock outstanding on the first day of each of 1997 and 1998.
The 1995 Plan was amended to increase the share reserve to 3,310,217 shares of
common stock and to provide that the number of shares issuable under the 1995
Plan would increase automatically on January 1, 1999 by an additional number of
shares equal to 5% of the number of shares of common stock and common stock
equivalents outstanding on December 31, 1998. The amendment was approved by the
Red Brick Board on March 18, 1998 and by the Red Brick stockholders on May 15,
1998. As of September 30, 1998, 1,801,537
176
<PAGE>
shares had been issued under the 1995 Plan (including options incorporated from
the 1991 Plan), options for 2,645,800 shares were outstanding (including options
incorporated from the 1991 Plan), and 28,359 shares remained available for
future grant. Shares of common stock subject to outstanding options, including
options granted under the 1991 Plan, which expire or terminate prior to exercise
will be available for future issuance under the 1995 Plan.
Under the 1995 Plan, employees (including officers) and independent
consultants may, at the discretion of the plan administrator, be granted options
to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price not less than 85% of the
fair market value of such shares on the grant date. Non-employee members of the
Red Brick Board are eligible solely for automatic option grants under the 1995
Plan.
The 1995 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board.
The Compensation Committee has complete discretion to determine which eligible
individuals are to receive option grants, the number of shares subject to each
such grant, the status of any granted option as either an incentive option or a
non-statutory option under the Federal tax laws, the vesting schedule to be in
effect for each option grant and the maximum term for which each granted option
is to remain outstanding. No one person participating in the 1995 Plan may
receive options for more than 300,000 shares of common stock per calendar year
or 500,000 shares of common stock in the calendar year in which an individual
first commences service.
The exercise price for options granted under the 1995 Plan may be paid in
cash or in outstanding shares of common stock. Options may also be exercised on
a cashless basis through the same-day sale of the purchased shares. The
Compensation Committee may also permit the optionee to pay the exercise price
through a promissory note payable in installments over a period of years. The
amount financed may include any federal or state income and employment taxes
incurred by reason of the option exercise.
Each option granted to an officer of Red Brick subject to the short-swing
profit restrictions of the Federal securities laws includes a special stock
appreciation right that provides that, upon the acquisition of 50% or more of
Red Brick's outstanding voting stock pursuant to a hostile tender offer, such
option, if outstanding for at least six months, may be surrendered to Red Brick
in exchange for a cash distribution to the officer based upon the tender offer
price.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to effect, from time to time,
the cancellation of outstanding options under the 1995 Plan in return for the
grant of new options for the same or different number of option shares with an
exercise price per share based upon the fair market value of the common stock on
the new grant date.
In the event Red Brick is acquired by merger, consolidation or asset sale,
options granted under the 1995 Plan and shares of unvested stock will
immediately vest in full, unless such options are assumed or replaced with a
comparable cash incentive program and unless the right to repurchase unvested
shares is assigned. An option that is assumed will also accelerate if the
optionee's employment or service is terminated within the twelve month period
following a merger, consolidation or asset sale. The Compensation Committee has
the discretion to provide for automatic acceleration of one or more options upon
a merger, consolidation or asset sale, whether or not the options are assumed.
These provisions of the 1995 Plan may have the effect of discouraging or
deterring a change of control of Red Brick.
Under the automatic grant program, each individual serving as a non-employee
director received on the effective date of the initial public offering, and each
individual who first joins the Board as a non-employee director on or after the
effective date of the 1995 Plan will receive at that time, an automatic option
grant for 15,000 shares of common stock. In addition, at each annual
stockholders meeting, beginning in 1997, each non-employee director will
automatically be granted at that meeting, whether or not he or she is standing
for re-election at that particular meeting, a stock option to purchase 1,000
shares of common stock, provided such individual has served on the Board for at
least six months prior to such meeting. Each option will have an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the
177
<PAGE>
automatic grant date and a maximum term of ten years, subject to earlier
termination following the optionee's cessation of Board service. Each option
will be immediately exercisable for all of the shares but the shares will be
subject to repurchase at original cost. The repurchase right shall lapse and the
optionee vest in a series of four annual installments over the optionee's period
of Board service, beginning one year from the grant date. However, vesting of
the shares will automatically accelerate upon (i) an acquisition of Red Brick by
merger, consolidation or asset sale, (ii) a hostile take-over of Red Brick
effected by tender offer for more than 50% of the outstanding voting stock or
proxy contest for Board membership or (iii) the death or disability of the
optionee while serving as a Board member.
In the event that more than 50% of Red Brick's outstanding voting stock were
to be acquired pursuant to a hostile tender offer, each automatic option grant
that has been outstanding for at least six months will automatically be canceled
by Red Brick in return for a cash distribution from Red Brick based upon the
tender offer price per share of common stock at the time subject to the canceled
option.
The Board may amend or modify the 1995 Plan at any time. The 1995 Plan will
terminate on September 19, 2005, unless sooner terminated by the Board.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Red Brick adopted the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase
Plan"), and the Purchase Plan was approved by the stockholders on May 15, 1998.
A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the
Purchase Plan. The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the
Internal Revenue Code and was implemented beginning June 1, 1998 with an initial
offering period of 26 months. After this initial offering period, the Purchase
Plan is implemented through a series of 24-month offerings with purchases
occurring at six-month intervals. The Purchase Plan is administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board. Employees are eligible to participate if
they are employed by Red Brick for more than 20 hours per week and have been
employed by Red Brick for at least sixty days. The Purchase Plan permits
eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions, which
may not exceed 10% of an employee's cash compensation, nor more than 1,000
shares per participant on any purchase date. The price of stock purchased under
the Purchase Plan is 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common
stock at the beginning of the 24-month offering period or on the applicable
semi-annual purchase date. Employees may end their participation in the offering
at any time during the offering period, and participation ends automatically on
termination of employment with Red Brick. Each outstanding purchase right will
be exercised immediately prior to a merger or consolidation. The Board may amend
or terminate the Purchase Plan immediately after the close of any purchase date.
However, the Board may not, without stockholder approval, materially increase
the number of shares of common stock available for issuance. The Purchase Plan
will in all events terminate after the scheduled purchase date in January 2008.
However, if the Merger is consummated then the Purchase Plan will terminate
immediately following the purchase at the time of consummation of the Merger.
178
<PAGE>
RED BRICK STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth as of September 30, 1998, certain information
with respect to shares beneficially owned by (i) each person who is known by Red
Brick to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of Red Brick's
outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each of the executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table above, (iii) each of Red Brick's directors, and
(iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial
ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange
Act. Under this rule, certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by
more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the
power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be
beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire shares
(for example, upon exercise of an option or warrant) within 60 days of the date
as of which the information is provided; in computing the percentage ownership
of any person, the amount of shares is deemed to include the amount of shares
beneficially owned by such person by reason of such acquisition rights. As a
result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in the
following table does not necessarily reflect the person's actual voting power at
a particular date.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1998(1)(2)
---------------------------
NUMBER OF PERCENTAGE OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER SHARES CLASS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Cowen & Company and affiliated entities(3) ............................................ 738,600 5.9%
Financial Square, Thirty-first Floor
New York, NY 10005-3597
New Valley Corporation and affiliated entities(4) ..................................... 634,015 5.1%
International Place, 100 Southeast Second Street
Miami, FL 33131
Christopher G. Erickson(5) ............................................................ 861,522 6.8%
485 Alberto Way
Los Gatos, CA 95032
Phillip M. Fernandez(6)................................................................ 195,958 1.5%
Robert C. Hausmann(7).................................................................. 139,423 1.1%
Anthony W. Layzell..................................................................... -- *
Alexander Wilson....................................................................... 9,751 *
Andrew K. Ludwick(8)................................................................... 16,000 *
John F. Shoch(9)....................................................................... 239,874 1.9%
All current directors and executive officers as a group ............................... 1,433,278 11.1%
(10 persons, including any listed above)(10)
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock
(1) Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to
applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole
voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock. To
Red Brick's knowledge, the entities named in the table have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as
beneficially owned by them except as otherwise disclosed below.
(2) The number of shares of common stock deemed outstanding includes shares
issuable pursuant to stock options that may be exercised within 60 days
after September 30, 1998, as well as outstanding common stock held as of
September 30, 1998.
(3) Includes shares owned directly by Cowen & Company, Cowen Incorporated and
Joseph M. Cohen. Information regarding ownership by Cowen & Company, Cowen
Incorporated and Joseph M. Cohen
179
<PAGE>
is stated as of December 31, 1997, and was obtained from a Schedule 13G
filed by such owners with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
18, 1998. According to SEC filings, Cowen Incorporated is a parent holding
company of Cowen & Company under Rule 13d-1(b)(ii)(G) and Joseph M. Cohen
may be deemed to control Cowen Incorporated. Red Brick is not responsible
for any errors or omissions in such information.
(4) Includes shares owned directly by Bennett S. Lebow, BGLS, Inc., Brooke
Group, N.V. Holdings, Inc., and New Valley Corporation. Information
regarding ownership by Bennett S. Lebow, BGLS, Inc., Brooke Group, N.V.
Holdings, Inc., and New Valley Corporation is stated as of September 25,
1998, and was obtained from a Schedule 13D filed by such owners with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 1998 and amended on
October 9, 1998. Red Brick is not responsible for any errors or omissions in
such information.
(5) Includes options exercisable into 92,152 shares of common stock.
(6) Includes options exercisable into 171,197 shares of common stock.
(7) Includes all Red Brick shares held by the Robert C. Hausmann and Lori Anne
Hausmann Revocable Living Trust dated November 21, 1991.
(8) Represents options exercisable into 16,000 shares of common stock.
(9) Includes 17,918 shares owned by Asset Management Associates 1989, L.P.
("Asset Management"). Dr. Shoch, a director of Red Brick, is a general
partner of AMC Partners 89 L.P. ("AMC Partners"), which is the general
partner of Asset Management. Dr. Shoch disclaims beneficial ownership of the
shares held by Asset Management except to the extent of his pecuniary
interest therein arising from his interests in Asset Management and AMC
Partners. Dr. Shoch's shares include 2,000 shares held by his spouse and
options exercisable into 16,000 shares of common stock.
(10) Includes options exercisable into 403,991 shares of common stock.
180
<PAGE>
RED BRICK CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
Christopher G. Erickson purchased shares of restricted common stock awarded
on January 18, 1995, at a purchase price of $0.32 by delivery of a promissory
note on February 14, 1995 in the principal amount of $35,247. The 1995 loan is
full recourse, bears interest at the rate of 7.96% per annum, is due February
14, 1999, and is secured by the shares of common stock purchased with the
proceeds of the loan. Mr. Erickson's remaining indebtedness under the 1995 loan
as of September 30, 1998 was $7,345.
Red Brick's Certificate of Incorporation limits the liability of its
directors for monetary damages arising from a breach of their fiduciary duty as
directors, except to the extent otherwise required by the Delaware General
Corporation Law. Such limitation of liability does not affect the availability
of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.
Red Brick's Bylaws provide that Red Brick shall indemnify its directors and
officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, including in
circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise discretionary under Delaware
law. Red Brick has also entered into indemnification agreements with its
officers and directors containing provisions that may require Red Brick, among
other things, to indemnify such officers and directors against certain
liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or
officers, and to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding
against them as to which they could be indemnified.
181
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF RED BRICK CAPITAL STOCK
As of the date of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the authorized capital
stock of Red Brick consists of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $.0001 par
value, and 2,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value. The following
description of Red Brick's capital stock does not purport to be complete and is
subject to and qualified in its entirety by Red Brick's Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws and by the provisions of applicable Delaware law.
COMMON STOCK
As of September 30, 1998, there were 12,558,738 shares of common stock
outstanding. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on
all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders. Holders of Red Brick common
stock do not have cumulative voting rights, and, therefore, subject to the
applicable provisions of Delaware law, holders of a majority of the shares
entitled to vote for the election of directors can elect all of the directors
and take other stockholder actions. Subject to preferences that may be
applicable to any outstanding Preferred Stock, the holders of common stock are
entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time
to time by the Red Brick Board out of funds legally available therefor. In the
event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Red Brick, the holders of
common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment
of liabilities, subject to prior distribution rights of Preferred Stock, if any,
then outstanding. The common stock has no preemptive or conversion rights or
other subscription rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions
applicable to the common stock. All outstanding shares of common stock are fully
paid and nonassessable.
PREFERRED STOCK
Red Brick's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes 2,000,000 shares of
Preferred Stock, none of which are currently issued or outstanding. The Red
Brick Board has the authority to issue the Preferred Stock in one or more series
and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof,
including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights,
terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number
of shares constituting any series or the designation of such series, without
further vote or action by the stockholders. The issuance of Preferred Stock may
have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Red
Brick without further action by the stockholders. For example, the Red Brick
Board could issue Preferred Stock that has the power to prevent a change of
control transaction. The issuance of Preferred Stock with voting and conversion
rights may adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock,
including the loss of voting control to others. Red Brick currently has no plans
to issue any of the Preferred Stock.
RIGHTS AGREEMENT
Red Brick adopted a Rights Agreement, dated July 21, 1997 (the "Red Brick
Rights Agreement"), and declared a dividend distribution of one Preferred Share
Purchase Right (for purposes of this subsection, a "Right") on each outstanding
share of Red Brick's common stock. The non-taxable dividend distribution was
made on August 25, 1997 to stockholders of record on that date. After the record
date, Red Brick mailed to each stockholder a summary of the Red Brick Rights
Agreement. The Rights will expire on July 20, 2007.
Each of the Rights, which are not presently exercisable, entitles the holder
to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Red Brick's Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $65.00 per one
one-thousandth of a share. In the event that any person acquires 15% or more of
Red Brick's outstanding common stock, each holder of a Right (other than the
acquiring person or group) will be entitled to receive, upon payment of the
exercise price, that number of shares of common stock having a market value
equal to twice the exercise price. In addition, following the acquisition by a
person or group
182
<PAGE>
of 15% or more of Red Brick's common stock and prior to an acquisition of 50% or
more of Red Brick's common stock, each Right will entitle its holder to purchase
shares of the acquiring company's common shares having a market value equal to
twice the exercise price. The Rights may be redeemed for one-tenth of a cent per
Right at the option of the Red Brick Board prior to the acquisition by a person
or group of beneficial ownership of 15% or more of Red Brick's common stock.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Red Brick Rights Agreement was amended
on October 7, 1998, to (i) render the Rights Plan inapplicable to the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and related
agreements; (ii) ensure that (A) neither Informix nor Merger Sub, nor any of
their affiliates shall be deemed to have become an acquiring person under the
Red Brick Rights Agreement by virtue of entering into the Merger Agreement and
related agreements and (B) a distribution date, trigger date or shares
acquisition date (as such terms are defined in the Red Brick Rights Agreement)
or similar event does not occur by reason of Informix, Merger Sub and/or Red
Brick entering into the Merger Agreement or related agreements, or by the
consummation of the other transactions contemplated thereby; (iii) provide that
the exercise of Rights under the Red Brick Rights Agreement shall expire
immediately prior to the Effective Time; and (iv) provide that such amendment of
the Red Brick Rights Agreement may not be further amended by Red Brick without
the prior written consent of Informix.
ANTITAKEOVER EFFECTS OF PROVISIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND
DELAWARE LAW
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
Red Brick's Bylaws provide that all stockholder actions must be effected at
a duly called meeting and not by a consent in writing. Red Brick's Bylaws
provide that special meetings of the stockholders can only be called by the
President, or by the President or Secretary upon written request of a majority
of the members of the Red Brick Board. In addition, Red Brick's Bylaws establish
an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an
annual meeting of stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for
election to the Red Brick Board. Stockholders at an annual meeting may only
consider proposals or nominations specified in the notice of meeting or brought
before the meeting by or at the direction of the Red Brick Board or by a
stockholder who was a stockholder of record on the record date for the meeting,
who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has delivered timely written
notice in proper form to Red Brick's secretary of the stockholder's intention to
bring such business before the meeting. The foregoing provisions of Red Brick's
Bylaws are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the
composition of the Red Brick Board and in the policies formulated by the Red
Brick Board and to discourage certain types of transactions which may involve an
actual or threatened change of control of Red Brick. Such provisions are
designed to reduce the vulnerability of Red Brick to an unsolicited acquisition
proposal and, accordingly, could discourage potential acquisition proposals and
could delay or prevent a change in control of Red Brick. Such provisions are
also intended to discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights but
could, however, have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers
for Red Brick's shares and, consequently, may also inhibit fluctuations in the
market price of Red Brick's shares that could result from actual or rumored
takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of preventing
changes in the management of Red Brick.
DELAWARE TAKEOVER STATUTE
Red Brick is subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation law
("Section 203"), which, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits a Delaware
corporation from engaging in any business combinations with any interested
stockholder for a period of three years following the date that such stockholder
became an interested stockholder, unless: (i) prior to such date, the Board of
Directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the
transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
(ii) upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least
85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the
transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining
183
<PAGE>
the number of shares outstanding those shares owned (x) by persons who are
directors and also officers and (y) by employee stock plans in which employee
participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares
held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
(iii) on or subsequent to such date, the business combination is approved by the
Board of Directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least
66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested
stockholder.
Section 203 defines business combination to include: (i) any merger or
consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder; (ii) any
sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more of the assets of the
corporation involving the interested stockholder; (iii) subject to certain
exceptions, any transaction that results in the issuance or transfer by the
corporation of any stock of the corporation to the interested stockholder; (iv)
any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of increasing the
proportionate share of the stock of any class or series of the corporation
beneficially owned by the interested stockholder; or (v) the receipt by the
interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees,
pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation. In
general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder as any entity or person
beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the
corporation and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or
controlled by such entity or person.
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
Certain holders of outstanding Red Brick common stock are entitled to
certain rights with respect to the registration of such shares under the
Securities Act ("Registration Rights"). Registration Rights were granted (i) to
certain holders of Red Brick common stock ("private company investors") that
purchased shares of Red Brick Preferred Stock prior to the time of Red Brick's
initial public offering, which such shares were automatically converted into Red
Brick common stock upon the consummation of such offering, (ii) to certain
present and former officers of Red Brick, and (iii) to Engage in conjunction
with the purchase of certain technology. Registration Rights granted to the
private company investors and certain present and former officers prior to the
initial public offering of Red Brick terminate after the later of (a) two (2)
years following the date of the initial public offering, or (b) the date such
stockholder is able to sell all of the common stock held by such stockholder in
a three-month period pursuant to Rule 144, under the Securities Act ("Rule
144"), or a successor rule. Registration Rights granted to Engage terminate on
August 29, 2000, or with respect to the sale of any of the common stock held by
Engage pursuant to Rule 144 or an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act.
To the extent that a stockholder's Registration Rights still survive, if Red
Brick proposes to register any of its securities under the Securities Act,
either for its own account or for the account of other security holders
exercising Registration Rights, such holders are entitled to notice of such
registration and are entitled to include shares of such common stock therein.
Certain of such stockholders benefiting from these rights may also require Red
Brick to file a registration statement under the Securities Act at Red Brick's
expense with respect to their shares of common stock. With respect to the
private company investors and former and current officers holding Registration
Rights, Red Brick is required to use its diligent reasonable efforts to effect
such registration and holders may require Red Brick to file additional
registration statements on Form S-3 at Red Brick's expense. The Registration
Rights are subject to certain conditions and limitations, among them the right
of the underwriters of an offering to limit the number of shares included in
such registration in certain circumstances.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The Transfer Agent and Registrar for the common stock is Harris Trust and
Savings Bank.
184
<PAGE>
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of Informix common stock to be issued in
connection with the Merger will be passed upon for Informix by Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, Palo Alto, California. Certain
legal matters in connection with the Merger will be passed upon for Red Brick by
Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian, LLP, Menlo Park,
California.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Informix Corporation at December
31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1997, appearing in this Prospectus and Registration Statement have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report
thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such
report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Red Brick Systems, Inc. at December
31, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1997, included in this Proxy Statement/ Prospectus have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon
(which contains an emphasis paragraph describing Red Brick's reduction in
license revenues, continued losses from operations and substantial cash used in
operating activities which adversely affect Red Brick's current results of
operations and liquidity as described in the second paragraph of Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements) appearing elsewhere herein, and are included
in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
185
<PAGE>
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
---------
<S> <C>
INFORMIX
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997............. F-2
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
1998 and September 28, 1997.............................................................................. F-3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
1998 and September 28, 1997.............................................................................. F-4
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements............................................. F-5
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.......................................................... F-16
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996............................................... F-17
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................. F-18
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................. F-19
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995....... F-20
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................................................. F-21
RED BRICK
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997............. F-48
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
1998 and 1997............................................................................................ F-49
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
1998 and 1997............................................................................................ F-50
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements............................................. F-51
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.......................................................... F-55
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996............................................... F-56
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................. F-57
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................. F-58
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995....... F-59
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................................................. F-60
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
INFORMIX CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents......................................................... $ 144,852 $ 139,396
Short-term investments............................................................ 11,562 16,069
Accounts receivable, net.......................................................... 151,637 142,048
Deferred taxes.................................................................... 45,717 12,249
Other current assets.............................................................. 24,182 26,243
------------- ------------
Total current assets............................................................ 377,950 336,005
Property and equipment, net......................................................... 75,864 96,012
Software costs, net................................................................. 37,972 40,854
Deferred taxes...................................................................... 18,046 56,345
Intangible assets, net.............................................................. 6,615 8,277
Other assets........................................................................ 21,897 25,751
------------- ------------
Total assets.................................................................... $ 538,344 $ 563,244
------------- ------------
------------- ------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.................................................................. $ 24,693 $ 36,155
Accrued expenses.................................................................. 44,681 64,538
Accrued employee compensation..................................................... 47,891 49,154
Income taxes payable.............................................................. 4,947 3,031
Deferred maintenance revenue...................................................... 115,485 100,828
Advances from customers and financial institutions................................ 139,304 180,048
Accrued restructuring costs....................................................... 9,085 26,597
Other liabilities................................................................. 6,334 15,802
------------- ------------
Total current liabilities......................................................... 392,348 476,153
Other liabilities................................................................... 4,467 6,311
Deferred taxes...................................................................... 14,895 21,716
Stockholders' equity:
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock.............................................. -- 2
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock.............................................. -- 1
Common stock; par value........................................................... 1,723 1,526
Additional paid-in capital........................................................ 373,136 347,582
Accumulated deficit............................................................... (245,001) (278,144)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax.................................. (3,224) (11,903)
------------- ------------
Total stockholders' equity........................................................ 126,634 59,064
------------- ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity...................................... $ 538,344 $ 563,244
------------- ------------
------------- ------------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-2
<PAGE>
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
INFORMIX CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
-----------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997
---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Net Revenues:
Licenses............................................................................... $ 265,731 $ 273,081
Services............................................................................... 254,680 209,532
---------- -----------
520,411 482,613
Costs and expenses:
Cost of software distribution.......................................................... 26,661 52,860
Cost of services....................................................................... 113,404 128,197
Sales and marketing.................................................................... 193,716 347,906
Research and development............................................................... 107,673 108,420
General and administrative............................................................. 50,549 72,110
Write-off of goodwill and other long-term assets....................................... -- 30,473
Write-off of acquired research and development......................................... -- 7,000
Restructuring.......................................................................... (7,255) 109,356
---------- -----------
484,748 856,322
---------- -----------
Operating income (loss).................................................................. 35,663 (373,709)
Interest income........................................................................ 6,359 3,691
Interest expense....................................................................... (4,582) (6,839)
Other income/(expense), net............................................................ (2,396) 17,596
---------- -----------
Income (loss) before income taxes........................................................ 35,044 (359,261)
Income taxes............................................................................. 1,900 6,800
---------- -----------
Net income (loss)........................................................................ $ 33,144 $ (366,061)
Preferred stock dividend............................................................... (1,816) --
Value assigned to warrants............................................................. (1,982) --
---------- -----------
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders...................................... $ 29,346 $ (366,061)
---------- -----------
---------- -----------
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic.................................................................................. $ 0.18 $ (2.41)
---------- -----------
---------- -----------
Diluted................................................................................ $ 0.17 $ (2.41)
---------- -----------
---------- -----------
Shares used in per share calculation:
Basic.................................................................................. 165,711 151,708
---------- -----------
---------- -----------
Diluted................................................................................ 171,406 151,708
---------- -----------
---------- -----------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
INFORMIX CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
---------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997
--------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Operating Activities:
Net income (loss).......................................................................... $ 33,144 $ (366,061)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash and cash equivalents used in
operating activities:
License fees received in advance......................................................... (48,561) (51,025)
Depreciation and amortization............................................................ 35,279 51,491
Amortization of capitalized software..................................................... 15,841 15,923
Write-off of capitalized software........................................................ 771 14,749
Write-off of long term assets............................................................ -- 6,799
Write-off of intangibles................................................................. -- 20,033
Write-off of acquired research & development............................................. -- 7,000
Foreign currency transaction losses...................................................... 152 855
(Gain) loss on sales or write-downs of strategic investments............................. 880 (4,445)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment............................................... 1,736 8,272
Provisions for losses on accounts receivable............................................. (5,569) 12,962
Restructuring charges, net of adjustments................................................ (7,255) 91,873
Stock-based employee compensation........................................................ 715 --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable.................................................................... (7,462) 53,444
Other current assets................................................................... 3,357 3,193
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities......................................... (57,405) (11,417)
Deferred maintenance revenue........................................................... 11,406 2,392
--------- ----------
Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities................................. (22,971) (143,962)
Investing Activities:
Investments of excess cash:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities............................................... (24,908) (25,553)
Maturities of available-for-sale securities.............................................. 5,119 13,468
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities...................................... 24,300 37,482
Proceeds from sale of strategic investments................................................ 1,500 10,002
Purchases of strategic investments......................................................... (1,000) (2,250)
Purchases of property and equipment........................................................ (13,152) (94,176)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment........................................... 693 2,644
Additions to software costs................................................................ (13,728) (17,188)
Business combinations, net of cash acquired................................................ -- (8,817)
Other...................................................................................... (239) 8,846
--------- ----------
Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities................................. (21,415) (75,542)
Financing Activities:
Advances from customers and financial institutions......................................... 10,092 21,787
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net................................................ 12,752 9,010
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net............................................. 14,100 37,600
Principal payments on capital leases....................................................... (3,349) (1,268)
--------- ----------
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities........................... 33,595 67,129
--------- ----------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents............................. 16,247 4,802
--------- ----------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents......................................... 5,456 (147,573)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period......................................... 139,396 226,508
--------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period............................................... $ 144,852 $ 78,935
--------- ----------
--------- ----------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE A--PRESENTATION OF INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements. All
significant adjustments, in the opinion of management, which are normal,
recurring in nature and necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
position and results of the operations of the Company, have been consistently
recorded. The operating results for the interim periods presented are not
necessarily indicative of expected performance for the entire year. The
unaudited information should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements of Informix Corporation ("Informix" or "the
Company") and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 1997 included in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Effective January 1, 1998, the Company elected to change from the 4-4-5 week
quarterly convention previously followed to a calendar quarter convention. The
change resulted in an additional three days of operations for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the same period in the previous
year. The impact on the Company's financial statements for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 1998 was to increase license revenue by $17.4 million, or 7%
percent. In addition, accounts receivable increased approximately $17.4 million
and accrued expenses increased approximately $2.7 million.
NOTE B--RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL 1996, 1995 AND 1994 AND THE
FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 1997
Subsequent to the filing of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 30, 1997 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
Company became aware of errors and irregularities that ultimately affected the
timing and dollar amount of reported earned revenues from license transactions
for all periods in the three years ended December 31, 1996 and the quarter ended
March 30, 1997. The irregularities took numerous forms and were primarily the
result of lack of compliance with or circumvention of the Company's procedures
and controls.
These errors and irregularities included unauthorized and undisclosed
arrangements or agreements between Company personnel and resellers, recognition
of revenue on certain transactions in reporting periods prior to contract
acceptance, the recording of certain transactions that lacked economic substance
and the recording of maintenance revenue as license revenue. The unauthorized
and undisclosed agreements with resellers introduced acceptance contingencies,
permitted resellers to return unsold licenses for refunds, extended payment
terms or committed the Company to assist resellers in selling the licenses to
end-users. Accordingly, license revenue from these transactions that was
recorded at the time product was delivered to resellers should have instead been
recorded at the time all conditions on the sale lapsed. Because of the
pervasiveness of the unauthorized arrangements with resellers in the 1994, 1995
and 1996 accounting periods, the Company concluded that all revenue from license
agreements with resellers in these accounting periods, except for those licenses
sold and billed on a per copy basis, should be recognized only when the licenses
were resold or utilized by resellers and all related obligations had been
satisfied. Amounts received from resellers as prepayments of software license
fees in advance of revenue recognition have been recorded as advances from
customers and financial institutions. This revised application of accounting
policy has been followed for all transactions with resellers, other than those
licenses sold and billed on a per-copy basis.
F-5
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE B--RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In response to the errors and irregularities discussed above, a number of
conditions which collectively represented a material weakness in the Company's
internal accounting controls were identified. These conditions included a
deterioration in the Company's internal accounting controls at corporate and
regional management levels, and a related failure to stress the importance of
these controls, an inappropriate level of influence, principally by the
Company's sales organization, over the revenue recognition process and an
apparent lack of clarity and consistent understanding within the Company
concerning the application of the Company's revenue recognition policies to
large, complex reseller license transactions. The Company is implementing a plan
to strengthen the Company's internal accounting controls. This plan includes
updating the Company's policies regarding accounting and reporting for large,
complex reseller license transactions, developing and conducting educational
programs to implement such policies, changing the Company's corporate and
regional accounting and reporting structure, and re-establishing an internal
audit function reporting to the Company's Board of Directors.
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 1998
On May 20, 1998, the Company announced that it had restated its financial
results for the first quarter ended March 31, 1998. The restatement of the
Company's financial results for the first quarter occurred in connection with
the Company's accounting treatment for license transactions with industrial
manufacturers ("IMs").
In connection with the restatement of its financial statements for fiscal
1994, 1995, 1996 and the first quarter of fiscal 1997, the Company examined
both: (1) agreements where customers committed to purchase up to a designated
dollar amount of software licenses ("Commitment Agreements"); and (2) agreements
where customers purchased licenses on a per copy basis ("Straight Purchase
Agreements"). The Company determined that unauthorized and undisclosed
agreements (which included the introduction of acceptance contingencies,
permission to return unsold licenses for refunds and extended payment terms) had
been made to certain customers in connection with Commitment Agreements, but not
in connection with Straight Purchase Agreements.
The Company had entered into Commitment Agreements with end users, IMs and
other resellers during such prior periods, all of which were initially accounted
for on a sell-in basis (I.E., recognizing revenue upon the initial shipment of
the Company's software to the customer). Upon further examination of its
Commitment Agreements in connection with the restatement process, the Company
determined that the unauthorized and undisclosed agreements had been made with
certain resellers, but not with end users. As a result: (1) the Company did not
restate revenue resulting from Commitment Agreements with end users; and (2) the
Company restated all revenue resulting from Commitment Agreements with all
resellers from a sell-in to a sell-through basis (I.E., recognizing revenue only
when the reseller resold or utilized the licenses and all related obligations
were satisfied).
Some of the Company's software license agreements with IMs were Commitment
Agreements and some were Straight Purchase Agreements. Instead of analyzing
every Commitment Agreement with IMs to determine whether unauthorized and
undisclosed agreements had been made, the Company conservatively treated all
Commitment Agreements with IMs as reseller agreements for accounting purposes
and restated that IM revenue to a sell-through basis. The total amount of
revenue resulting from all Commitment Agreements with IMs was not material in
fiscal 1994, 1995, 1996 or the first quarter of fiscal 1997. Straight Purchase
Agreements with IMs were not restated.
F-6
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE B--RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The Company initially decided to recognize revenue from IM transactions
after December 31, 1997 on a sell-in basis. The Company's license transactions
with IMs and end users are substantially similar in that upon the delivery of
the Company's software to the IM: (1) all obligations of the Company under the
software license agreement are fully performed; and (2) the Company believes the
earnings process with regard to these transactions to be complete. Accordingly,
in its original report of the financial results for the quarter ended March 31,
1998, the Company had recognized approximately $6.2 million in license revenue
resulting from software license agreements with IMs in the same manner as
revenue resulting from agreements with end users.
The Company subsequently decided to change its initial decision and to
recognize revenue resulting from all license transactions with IMs on a
sell-through basis upon the advice of the Company's former independent
accountants, Ernst & Young LLP. Accordingly, approximately $6.2 million in
license revenue previously recognized has been deferred and will be recognized
only when the related software licenses are resold to end user customers over a
period which the Company expects to be approximately two years.
The effects of the restatement of the Company's financial reports for the
quarter ended March 31, 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS REPORTED RESTATED
----------- ---------
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998
----------------------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT
PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C>
Net revenues:
Licenses............................................ $ 89,462 $ 83,431
Services............................................ 77,720 77,568
----------- ---------
$ 167,182 $ 160,999
----------- ---------
Operating income...................................... $ 9,137 $ 3,870
Income tax............................................ $ 1,900 $ 1,900
Net income............................................ $ 7,078 $ 1,811
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders... $ 4,881 $ (386)
Net income (loss) per share
Basic............................................... $ 0.03 $ (0.00)
Diluted............................................. $ 0.03 $ (0.00)
Accumulated deficit................................... $(271,066) $(276,333)
Advances from customers and financial institutions.... $ 156,505 $ 156,505
</TABLE>
In connection with its audit of the Company's fiscal 1997 consolidated
financial statements, the Company's former independent accountants determined
that a material weakness existed, based on the lack of appropriate resources in
the Finance Department of the Company and other conditions. To address these
conditions, the Company has hired, and plans to continue to hire, additional
finance personnel to serve in the Finance Department. In addition, the Company
has hired a number of consultants to assist the Finance Department.
F-7
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE C--REVENUE RECOGNITION POLICY
In October 1997, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
issued Statement of Position 97-2 (SOP 97-2), "Software Revenue Recognition"
which superseded SOP 91-1 and provides guidance on generally accepted accounting
principles for recognizing revenue on software transactions. SOP 97-2 requires
that revenue recognized from software arrangements be allocated to each element
of the arrangement based on the relative fair values of the elements, such as
software products, upgrades, enhancements, post contract customer support,
installation, or training. Under SOP 97-2, the determination of fair value is
based on objective evidence which is specific to the vendor. If such evidence of
fair value for each element of the arrangement does not exist, all revenue from
the arrangement is deferred until such time that evidence of fair value does
exist or until all elements of the arrangement are delivered. SOP 97-2 was
amended in February 1998 by Statement of Position 98-4 (SOP 98-4) "Deferral of
the Effective Date of a Provision of SOP 97-2" which deferred for one year the
specification of what was considered vendor specific objective evidence of fair
value for the various elements in a multiple element arrangement. The Company
has adopted the provisions of these SOP's as of January 1, 1998 and as a result,
changed certain business practices. The adoption has, in certain circumstances,
resulted in the deferral of software license revenues that would have been
recognized upon delivery of the related software under preceding accounting
standards. Neither the changes in certain business practices nor the deferral of
certain revenues have resulted in a material impact on the Company's operating
results, financial position or cash flows for the period ended September 30,
1998.
The Company's revenue recognition policy as of January 1, 1998 is as
follows:
LICENSE REVENUE. The Company recognizes revenue from sales of software
licenses to end users upon persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of
the software to a customer, determination that there are no significant
post-delivery obligations and collection of a fixed or determinable license fee
is considered probable. Revenue for transactions with resellers and industrial
manufacturers ("IMs"), except for those licenses sold and billed on a per-copy
basis, is currently recognized as earned when the licenses are resold or
utilized by the reseller and all related obligations of the Company have been
satisfied. The Company provides for sales allowances on an estimated basis. The
Company accrues royalty revenue through the end of the reporting period based on
reseller royalty reports or other forms of customer-specific historical
information. In the absence of customer-specific historical information, royalty
revenue is recognized when the customer-specific objective information becomes
available. Any subsequent changes to previously reported royalties are reflected
in the period when the updated information is received for the reseller.
SERVICE REVENUE. Maintenance contracts generally call for the Company to
provide technical support and software updates and upgrades to customers.
Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance
contract, generally on a straight-line basis. Other service revenue, primarily
training and consulting, is generally recognized at the time the service is
performed and it is determined that the Company has essentially fulfilled its
obligations resulting from the services contract, or on a contract accounting
basis. When the fee for maintenance and service is bundled with the license fee
and not separately stated, it is unbundled from the license fee using the
Company's objective evidence of the fair value of the maintenance and/or
services represented by the Company's customary pricing for such maintenance
and/or services, and deferred for revenue recognition purposes.
ADVANCES FROM CUSTOMERS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. Amounts received in
advance of revenue being recognized are recorded as a liability on the
accompanying financial statements. These amounts may be
F-8
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE C--REVENUE RECOGNITION POLICY (CONTINUED)
received either from the customer or from a financing entity to whom the
customer payment streams are sold.
The Company's license arrangements with some of its customers provide
contractually for a non-refundable fee payable by the customer in single or
multiple installment(s) at the initiation or over the term of the license
arrangement. If the Company fails to comply with certain contractual terms of a
specific license agreement, the Company could be required to refund the
amount(s) received to the customer or the financial institution in the event of
an assignment of receivables.
The Company's arrangements for financing of license contracts with customers
frequently took the form of a non-recourse sale of the future payment streams.
When such customer contracts were sold to a third-party financing entity, they
were typically sold at a discount which represented the financing cost. Such
discounts offset revenues in cases where the license was recorded as a sale. For
transactions where the financing was received prior to the recognition of
revenue, the financing discount has been charged ratably to interest expense
over the financing period, which approximates the "interest method."
NOTE D--DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS POLICY
The Company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to
reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk due to fluctuations in exchange
rates underlying the value of accounts receivable and accounts payable
denominated in foreign currencies (primarily European and Asian currencies)
until such receivables are collected and payables are disbursed. A forward
foreign currency exchange contract obligates the Company to exchange
predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at specified exchange
rates on specified dates or to make an equivalent U.S. dollar payment equal to
the value of such exchange. These forward foreign exchange contracts, to qualify
as hedges of existing assets or liabilities, are denominated in the same
currency in which the underlying foreign receivables or payables are denominated
and bear a contract value and maturity date which approximate the value and
expected settlement date of the underlying transactions. For contracts that are
designated and effective as hedges, discounts or premiums (the difference
between the spot exchange rate and the forward exchange rate at inception of the
contract) are accreted or amortized to other expenses over the contract lives
using the straight-line method while unrealized gains and losses on open
contracts at the end of each accounting period resulting from changes in the
spot exchange rate are deferred and recognized in earnings in the same period as
gains and losses on the underlying foreign denominated receivables or payables
are recognized and generally offset. Contract amounts in excess of the carrying
value of the Company's foreign denominated accounts receivable or payable
balances are marked to market, with changes in market value recorded in earnings
as foreign exchange gains or losses.
In addition, in the quarter ended March 31, 1998, the Company initiated a
program whereby it enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts that
do not qualify as hedges. These forward exchange contracts are marked to market
and comprise a significant portion of the Company's net foreign currency losses
of $2.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998.
NOTE E--COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
As of January 1, 1998, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board Statement No. 130 (FAS 130), "Reporting Comprehensive Income." FAS 130
establishes new rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and
its components; however, the adoption of this Statement had no impact on the
Company's net income/(loss) or stockholders' equity. FAS 130 requires unrealized
gains or
F-9
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE E--COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (CONTINUED)
losses on the Company's available-for-sale securities and foreign currency
translation adjustments, which prior to adoption were reported separately in
stockholders' equity, to be included in other comprehensive income.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
-----------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997
----------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Net income (loss)......................................................... $ 33,144 $ (366,061)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities.............. 3,850 (12,123)
Foreign currency translation adjustment................................. 4,828 (7)
----------- ----------
Comprehensive income (loss)............................................... $ 41,822 $ (378,191)
----------- ----------
----------- ----------
</TABLE>
NOTE F--NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net
income (loss) per common share:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
---------------------
SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28,
1998 1997
--------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT
PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C>
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share-- net
income (loss) applicable to common stockholders........................ $ 29,346 $ (366,061)
--------- ----------
--------- ----------
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per common share--weighted
average common shares outstanding...................................... 165,711 151,708
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options.......................................................... 2,696 --
Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants.................... 2,999 --
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants...................... -- --
--------- ----------
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per common share............... 171,406 151,708
--------- ----------
--------- ----------
Basic net income (loss) per common share................................. $ 0.18 $ (2.41)
Diluted net income (loss) per common share............................... $ 0.17 $ (2.41)
</TABLE>
The Company excluded potentially dilutive securities for each period
presented from its diluted EPS computation because either the exercise price of
the securities exceeded the average fair value of the Company's common stock or
the Company had net losses, and, therefore, these securities were anti-
F-10
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE F--NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (CONTINUED)
dilutive. A summary of the excluded potential dilutive securities and the
related exercise/conversion features as of September 30, 1998 follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Potential dilutive securities:
Stock options........................................................ 9,938
Stock warrants
Common Stock....................................................... 1,002
Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock............................. --
Convertible Preferred Stock
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock............................... --
</TABLE>
The stock options have per share exercise prices ranging from $5.75 to
$33.25 and are exercisable through June 2007.
The warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company (the "Series
B Warrants") were issued in connection with the conversion of certain shares of
the Company's Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series B Preferred")
into shares of Common Stock of the Company in accordance with the provisions
described below. Shares of the Company's Common Stock are purchasable under the
Series B Warrants at a per share exercise price of $7.84 and the Series B
Warrants are exercisable through November 2002.
Warrants to purchase shares of the Company's Series A-1 Preferred Stock (the
"Series A Preferred") are exercisable into shares of Series A-1 Preferred at a
per share price of $250 through August 15, 1999. Each Series A-1 Preferred share
is convertible into shares of the Company's Common Stock at a per share price
equal to 101% of the average price of the Company's Common Stock for the thirty
trading days ending five trading days prior to conversion, but not greater than
the lesser of (i) 105% of the Company's Common Stock's average price of the
first five trading days of such thirty-day period, or (ii) $12. If not converted
earlier, the Series A-1 Preferred Stock will generally convert automatically
into shares of the Company's Common Stock 18 months after their issuance.
Each Series B Preferred share is convertible, at the election of the holder,
into the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock at a per share price
equal to the lowest of (i) the average of the closing bid prices for the
Company's Common Stock for the 22 days immediately prior to the 180th day
following the initial issuance date, (ii) 101% of the average closing bid price
for the 22 trading days ending five days prior to the date of actual
conversions, or (iii) 101% of the lowest closing bid price for the Company's
Common Stock during the five trading days immediately prior to the date of
actual conversions. The conversion price of the Series B Preferred is subject to
modification and adjustment upon occurrence of certain events. If not converted
earlier, the Series B Preferred will automatically convert into shares of Common
Stock three years following the date of issuance. Upon conversion of the Series
B Preferred, the holders will receive Series B Warrants to purchase that number
of shares of the Company's Common Stock equal to 20% of the shares of the
Company's Common Stock into which the Series B Preferred is convertible, but not
less than an aggregate of 748,109 at a per share exercise price of $7.84.
F-11
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE G--SENIOR SECURED CREDIT AGREEMENT
In December 1997, Informix Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation and the
Company's principal operating subsidiary, entered into a Senior Secured Credit
Agreement with a syndicate of commercial banks, including BankBoston, N.A. as
administrative agent and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce as syndication
agent, providing for a revolving credit facility of up to $75 million (the
"Credit Facility"). Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility bear interest
at a premium over one of two alternative variable rates selected by the Company.
The "Base Rate" equals the greater of (i) the rate of interest announced by
BankBoston, N.A. as its "base rate" and (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate
plus 1/2 of 1% per year. The "Adjusted LIBOR Rate" equals (i) the London
Interbank Offered Rate divided by (ii) one minus the applicable reserve
requirement under Regulation D of the Federal Reserve Board. The maximum premium
over the Base Rate is 1.25%, and the maximum premium over the LIBOR Rate is
2.50%, subject to downward adjustment based on the Company's realizing certain
financial thresholds. The actual amount available under the Credit Facility, for
either direct borrowings or issuances of letters of credit, is based on 80% of
the eligible domestic accounts receivable and 50% of the eligible foreign
accounts receivable, which are measured on a revolving basis. As of September
30, 1998, the Company was able to borrow $50.3 million, subject to compliance
with certain covenants. During the quarter ended September 30, 1998, the lenders
under the Credit Facility waived the Company's non-compliance with certain
financial covenants as of June 30, 1998 and amended the Credit Facility so that
it now includes less restrictive financial covenants.
At September 30, 1998, the Company was in compliance with all of the
covenants under the amended Credit Facility. At September 30, 1998, no
borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility.
NOTE H--STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
In December 1997, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a second stock
option repricing which was effective January 9, 1998 (the "Second Repricing
Effective Date") based upon the closing sales price of the Company's Common
Stock as of the Second Repricing Effective Date. Under the terms of the second
repricing, each employee, excluding officers and directors of the Company, could
exchange any option granted and outstanding as of May 1, 1997 for a new option
with an exercise price equal to the closing sales price on the Second Repricing
Effective Date and with terms consistent with those of the original option,
except that options exchanged in the second repricing could not be exercised for
a period of one year from the Second Repricing Effective Date. Employees elected
to reprice 3,128,524 options at a price of $5.094, the closing sales price of
the Company's Common Stock on the Second Repricing Effective Date.
On February 13, 1998, the holders of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock
exercised warrants to purchase 60,000 additional shares of Series A-1 Preferred
at $250 per share resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $14.1 million. In
addition, pursuant to the Series A-1 Subscription Agreement, the Series A-1
Preferred stockholders converted 220,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred into
12,769,908 shares of the Company's Common Stock.
On June 10, 1998, a holder of the Series B Preferred Stock converted 500
shares of Series B Preferred into 80,008 shares of the Company's Common Stock.
In connection with such conversion, the Company also issued such Series B
Preferred Stockholder a warrant to purchase up to 66,000 shares of Common Stock
at a purchase price of $7.84 per share. Also, during the quarter ended June 30,
1998, the Company issued a warrant pursuant to the provisions of the Series B
Preferred to purchase up to an additional
F-12
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE H--STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
50,000 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $7.84 per share to a
financial advisor of the Company because, as of May 15, 1998, the closing sales
price of the Company's common stock was less than $12.50. Such warrant was
issued in connection with services provided by such financial advisor related to
the sale of shares of the Series B Preferred in November 1997.
In July 1998, the Company adopted its 1998 Non Statutory Stock Option Plan
under which it reserved 5,500,000 shares of its Common Stock for issuance to
employees and consultants of the Company other than executive officers and
directors.
During September 1998, holders of the Series B Preferred Stock converted a
total of 13,500 shares of Series B Preferred into 3,679,472 shares of the
Company's Common Stock. In connection with such conversions, the Company also
issued such Series B Preferred Stockholders warrants to purchase up to 885,891
shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $7.84 per share and paid cash
dividends in the amount of $549,178 to such stockholders.
Reconciliation of outstanding common shares:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Shares outstanding at December 31, 1997........................ 152,587,051
Shares issued upon exercises of stock options.................. 2,209,479
Shares sold and issued to employees under ESPP................. 984,828
Shares issued upon conversion of Series A-1 Preferred.......... 12,769,908
Shares issued upon conversion of Series B Preferred............ 3,759,480
----------
Shares outstanding at September 30, 1998....................... 172,310,746
----------
----------
</TABLE>
NOTE I--RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In June and September 1997, the Company approved plans to restructure its
operations to bring expenses in line with forecasted revenues. In connection
with the restructuring, the Company substantially reduced its worldwide
headcount and operations to improve efficiency. The following analysis sets
forth the significant components of the restructuring charge included in current
liabilities at September 30, 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RESTRUCTURING
EXPENSE
AT DEC. 31, NON-CASH CASH ACCRUAL BALANCE
1997 COSTS PAYMENTS ADJUSTMENTS AT SEPT. 30, 1998
--------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- -------------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Severance and benefits.................... $ 21.9 $ -- $ 19.6 $ 2.2 $ 0.1
Write-off of assets....................... 48.2 48.2 -- -- --
Facility charges.......................... 34.7 9.4 11.7 5.1 8.5
Other..................................... 3.4 2.7 0.2 -- 0.5
------ ----- ----- --- ---
$ 108.2 $ 60.3 $ 31.5 $ 7.3 $ 9.1
------ ----- ----- --- ---
------ ----- ----- --- ---
</TABLE>
Severance and benefits represent the reduction of approximately 670
employees, primarily sales and marketing personnel, on a worldwide basis. As of
September 30, 1998, the Company had substantially completed this component of
its restructuring plan. Write-off of assets included write-off or write-down in
carrying value of equipment as a result of the Company's decision to reduce the
number of Information
F-13
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE I--RESTRUCTURING CHARGES (CONTINUED)
Superstores throughout the world, as well as the write-off of equipment
associated with headcount reductions. The equipment subject to write-offs and
write-downs consisted primarily of computer servers, workstations, and personal
computers that are no longer utilized in the Company's operations. Facility
charges include early termination costs associated with the closing of certain
domestic and international sales offices.
Total restructuring expense decreased by $7.3 million during the nine-month
period ended September 30, 1998. This decrease was primarily due to adjusting
the estimated severance and facility charges to actual costs incurred. The
Company has substantially completed actions associated with its restructuring
except for subleasing or settling its remaining long-term operating leases
related to vacated properties.
NOTE J--LITIGATION
Commencing in April 1997, a series of class action lawsuits purportedly by
or on behalf of stockholders and a separate but related stockholder action were
filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
These actions name as defendants the Company, certain of its present and former
officers and directors and in some cases, its former independent auditors. The
complaints allege various violations of the federal securities laws and seek
unspecified but potentially significant damages. Similar actions were also filed
in California state court, Utah state court, federal court in the Southern
District of New York and in Newfoundland, Canada.
Stockholder derivative actions, purportedly on behalf of the Company and
naming virtually the same individual defendants and the Company's former
independent auditors, were also filed, commencing in August 1997, in California
state court. While these actions allege various violations of state law, any
monetary judgments in the derivative actions would accrue to the benefit of the
Company.
Pursuant to Delaware law and certain indemnification agreements between the
Company and each of its current and former officers and directors, the Company
is obligated to indemnify its current and former officers and directors for
certain liabilities arising from their employment with or service to the
Company. This includes the costs of defending against the claims asserted in the
above-referenced actions and any amounts paid in settlement or other disposition
of such actions on behalf of these individuals. The Company's obligations do not
permit or require it to provide such indemnification to any such individual who
is adjudicated to be liable for fraudulent or criminal conduct. Although the
Company has purchased directors' and officers' liability insurance to reimburse
it for the costs of indemnification for its directors and officers, the coverage
presumes that 100 percent of the costs incurred in defending claims asserted
jointly against the Company and its current and former directors and officers
are allocable to the individuals' defense. With respect to the claims described
above, the Company does not have insurance to cover the costs of its own defense
or to cover any liability for any claims asserted against it.
The pending federal and state securities actions are in the early stages of
discovery. Consequently, at this time it is not reasonably possible to estimate
the damages, or the range of damages, that the Company might incur in connection
with such actions. Therefore, the Company has not set aside any financial
reserves relating to any of the above-referenced actions.
In addition, in July 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a
formal order of investigation of the Company and certain unidentified
individuals associated with the Company with respect to non-specified accounting
matters, public disclosures and trading activity in the Company's
F-14
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
NOTE J--LITIGATION (CONTINUED)
securities. The Company is cooperating with the investigation and is providing
all information subpoenaed by the Commission.
On June 9, 1998, the Company filed a Post-Effective Amendment to its
Registration Statement on Form S-1 pertaining to the Company's sale of its
Series B Preferred stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
reviewed the Post-Effective Amendment and declared it effective on August 13,
1998. The Series B Preferred stockholders have claimed that during August 1998
they were prevented from selling shares of Series B Preferred stock until the
SEC completed its review of the Post-Effective Amendment and, as a result, the
Company had failed to comply with certain terms of a Registration Rights
Agreement between the Series B Preferred stockholders and the Company. The
Company is currently involved in discussions with the Series B Preferred
stockholders and expects to resolve this matter before the end of the current
fiscal year. The Company will account for any cost associated with the
resolution of this matter as an additional dividend to the Series B Preferred
stockholders. The Company is unable to estimate the amount, if any, of such
dividend.
In the ordinary course of business, various other lawsuits and claims are
filed from time to time against the Company. It is the Company's opinion that
the resolution of these disputes or such other litigation will not have a
material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
NOTE K--NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARD
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No.
133 (FAS 133), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities"
which establishes standards for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities.
It requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments
at fair value. FAS 133 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
1999. Earlier application of FAS 133 is encouraged but should not be applied
retroactively to financial statements of prior periods. The Company is currently
evaluating the requirements and impact of FAS 133.
NOTE L--SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In October 1998, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement
(the "Agreement") to acquire Red Brick Systems, Inc. ("Red Brick"), a company
that designs, develops, markets and supports data warehousing software. Under
the terms of the agreement, each share of Red Brick common stock will be
exchanged for 0.6 share of Informix common stock. The transaction will be
accounted for as a purchase. The transaction is subject to the satisfaction of
several conditions, including regulatory approval, the approval of Red Brick
stockholders and completion of an independent audit of Red Brick's financial
results for the first three quarters of 1998.
Subsequent to September 30, 1998, holders of the Series B Preferred
converted an additional 9,350 shares of Series B Preferred into 2,130,069 shares
of common stock. In connection with such conversions, Informix also issued such
Series B Preferred stockholders Warrants to purchase up to 426,010 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $7.84 per share and paid cash dividends in
the amount of $442,863 to such stockholders.
F-15
<PAGE>
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS--
INFORMIX CORPORATION
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Informix
Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Informix
Corporation at December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
March 2, 1998
F-16
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
1997 1996
--------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT SHARE
AND PER SHARE
AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.................................................................. $ 139,396 $ 226,508
Short-term investments..................................................................... 16,069 34,512
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $33,807 in 1997 and $21,429 in
1996..................................................................................... 142,048 194,499
Deferred taxes............................................................................. 12,249 42,133
Other current assets....................................................................... 26,243 35,662
--------- ---------
Total current assets......................................................................... 336,005 533,314
--------- ---------
Property and equipment, at cost
Computer equipment......................................................................... 189,985 225,336
Office equipment and leasehold improvements................................................ 73,084 67,982
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization........................................... (167,057) (106,591)
--------- ---------
96,012 186,727
Software costs, less accumulated amortization of $22,786 in 1997 and $41,559 in 1996......... 40,854 54,486
Deferred taxes............................................................................... 56,345 10,542
Long-term investments........................................................................ -- 6,639
Intangible assets, net....................................................................... 8,277 34,693
Other assets................................................................................. 25,751 55,597
--------- ---------
Total Assets................................................................................. $ 563,244 $ 881,998
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable........................................................................... $ 36,155 $ 65,446
Accrued expenses........................................................................... 64,538 59,723
Accrued employee compensation.............................................................. 49,154 57,626
Income taxes payable....................................................................... 3,031 5,757
Deferred maintenance revenue............................................................... 100,828 94,981
Advances from customers and financial institutions......................................... 180,048 239,506
Accrued restructuring costs................................................................ 26,597 --
Other current liabilities.................................................................. 15,802 7,138
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities.................................................................... 476,153 530,177
--------- ---------
6,311 2,359
Other non-current liabilities................................................................ 21,716 24,158
Deferred taxes...............................................................................
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share--5,000,000 shares authorized
Series A-1 convertible preferred stock, 160,000 shares issued and outstanding, aggregate
liquidation preference of $40,000....................................................... 2 --
Series B convertible preferred stock, 50,000 shares issued and outstanding, aggregate
liquidation preference of $50,301....................................................... 1 --
Common stock, par value $.01 per share--500,000,000 shares authorized, 152,587,000 and
150,782,000 shares issued and outstanding in 1997 and 1996, respectively................. 1,526 1,508
Additional paid-in capital................................................................. 347,582 243,564
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit).................................................... (278,144) 78,723
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.................................. (11,903) 1,509
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity................................................................... 59,064 325,304
--------- ---------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity................................................... $ 563,244 $ 881,998
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-17
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE
DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Revenues
Licenses................................................................. $ 378,164 $ 502,730 $ 462,061
Services................................................................. 285,728 231,810 174,486
------------ ---------- ----------
663,892 734,540 636,547
Costs and Expenses
Cost of software distribution............................................ 63,027 46,786 37,593
Cost of services......................................................... 166,916 144,850 91,540
Sales and marketing...................................................... 417,162 413,689 301,932
Research and development................................................. 139,310 120,211 85,643
General and administrative............................................... 87,498 64,416 51,114
Write-off of goodwill and other long-term assets......................... 30,473 -- --
Write-off of acquired research and development........................... 7,000 -- --
Restructuring charges.................................................... 108,248 -- --
Expenses related to Illustra merger...................................... -- 5,914 --
------------ ---------- ----------
1,019,634 795,866 567,822
------------ ---------- ----------
Operating income (loss).................................................... (355,742) (61,326) 68,725
Interest income.......................................................... 5,623 9,868 8,148
Interest expense......................................................... (9,405) (12,475) (6,299)
Other income, net........................................................ 10,474 2,899 120
------------ ---------- ----------
Income (loss) before income taxes.......................................... (349,050) (61,034) 70,694
Income taxes............................................................. 7,817 12,531 32,094
------------ ---------- ----------
Net income (loss).......................................................... (356,867) (73,565) 38,600
Preferred stock dividend................................................... (301) -- --
Value assigned to warrants................................................. (1,601) -- --
------------ ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders $ (358,769) $ (73,565) $ 38,600
------------ ---------- ----------
------------ ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic.................................................................... $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.27
------------ ---------- ----------
------------ ---------- ----------
Diluted.................................................................. $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.26
------------ ---------- ----------
------------ ---------- ----------
Shares used in per share calculations:
Basic.................................................................... 151,907 149,310 145,062
------------ ---------- ----------
------------ ---------- ----------
Diluted.................................................................. 151,907 149,310 150,627
------------ ---------- ----------
------------ ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-18
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)................................................................ $(356,867) $ (73,565) $ 38,600
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash and cash equivalents provided
by
(used in) operating activities:
License fees received in advance............................................... (64,797) (58,206) (34,237)
Depreciation and amortization.................................................. 65,639 47,207 28,949
Amortization of capitalized software........................................... 21,437 14,626 12,041
Write-off of capitalized software.............................................. 14,749 -- --
Write-off of long term assets.................................................. 6,799 -- --
Write-off of intangibles....................................................... 20,033 -- --
Write-off of acquired research and development................................. 7,000 -- --
Foreign currency transaction losses (gains).................................... 3,243 (5,349) (4,609)
Gain on sales of strategic investments......................................... (5,007) (3,856) --
Loss on disposal of property and equipment..................................... 10,815 2,393 605
Deferred tax expense........................................................... (328) (3,965) (16,577)
Provisions for losses on accounts receivable................................... 19,929 14,983 8,508
Restructuring charges.......................................................... 77,196 -- --
Stock-based employee compensation.............................................. 7,501 -- --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable.......................................................... 42,596 (45,426) (47,045)
Other current assets......................................................... 40,530 89 (8,441)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses........................................ (58,867) 52,077 64,294
Deferred maintenance revenue................................................. 3,618 29,590 17,197
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities....... (144,781) (29,402) 59,285
--------- --------- ---------
Investing Activities
Investments of excess cash:
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities....................................... -- -- (144,517)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities..................................... (35,255) (152,179) (4,303)
Maturities of held-to-maturity securities...................................... -- -- 83,159
Maturities of available-for-sale securities.................................... 14,468 126,137 6,104
Sales of available-for-sale securities......................................... 45,957 83,696 27,261
Purchases of strategic investments............................................... (3,250) (12,737) (1,000)
Proceeds from sales of strategic investments..................................... 10,454 7,299 --
Purchases of land, and property and equipment.................................... (93,786) (148,270) (56,500)
Proceeds from disposal of land, and property and equipment....................... 62,371 1,929 288
Additions to software costs...................................................... (20,776) (32,381) (23,977)
Business combinations, net of cash acquired...................................... (9,749) (4,340) (38,413)
Other............................................................................ (33,500) (14,434) (5,757)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities....................... (63,066) (145,280) (157,655)
--------- --------- ---------
Financing Activities
Advances from customers and financial institutions............................... 21,787 207,218 109,338
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net...................................... 9,239 24,357 27,898
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net................................... 87,600 -- --
Principal payments on capital leases............................................. (3,388) (1,025) (442)
Acquisition of common stock...................................................... -- (2,388) --
Reissuance of treasury stock..................................................... -- 578 --
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities................... 115,238 228,740 136,794
--------- --------- ---------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents..................... 5,497 8,145 (6,402)
--------- --------- ---------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents................................. (87,112) 62,203 32,022
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year................................... 226,508 164,305 132,283
--------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year......................................... $ 139,396 $ 226,508 $ 164,305
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-19
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PREFERRED STOCK
---------------------------------
SERIES A-1 SERIES B COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL TREASURY STOCK
--------------- --------------- ---------------- PAID-IN ---------------
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL SHARES AMOUNT
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at December 31,
1994........................ -- $-- -- $-- 140,154 $1,400 $153,343 $-- $--
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net income....................
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
reclassification
adjustments(1)............
Foreign currency translation
adjustments...............
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Other comprehensive income
(loss)....................
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Comprehensive income (loss)...
Exercise of stock options..... 4,377 44 13,712
Sale of stock to employees
under employee stock
purchase plan............... 349 3 6,603
Issuance of stock, net of
costs....................... 2,571 28 7,508
Tax benefits related to stock
options..................... 21,291
Acquisition of STG............ 533 5 1,991
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Balances at December 31,
1995........................ -- -- -- -- 147,984 1,480 204,448 -- --
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net loss......................
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
reclassification
adjustments(1)............
Foreign currency translation
adjustments...............
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Other comprehensive income
(loss)....................
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Comprehensive income (loss)...
Exercise of stock options..... 2,182 22 13,343
Sale of stock to employees
under employee stock
purchase plan............... 616 6 10,986
Acquisition of treasury
stock....................... (100) (2,388)
Reissuance of treasury
stock....................... 100 2,388
Tax benefits related to stock
options..................... 14,787
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Balances at December 31,
1996........................ -- -- -- -- 150,782 1,508 243,564 -- --
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net loss......................
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
reclassification
adjustments(1)............
Foreign currency translation
adjustments...............
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Other comprehensive income
(loss)....................
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Comprehensive income (loss)...
Exercise of stock options..... 1,132 11 3,563
Sale of stock to employees
under employee stock
purchase plan............... 573 6 5,659
Stock-based compensation
expense resulting from stock
options..................... 7,501
Issuance of Series A-1
convertible preferred stock
and warrants, net........... 160 2 37,598
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred stock
and warrants, net........... 50 1 49,196
Common stock issued for
services rendered in
connection with the Series B
convertible preferred stock
offering.................... 100 1 802
Accrual of 5% cumulative
preferred dividends on
Series B convertible
preferred stock............. (301)
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
Balance at December 31,
1997........................ 160 $ 2 50 $ 1 $152,587 $1,526 $347,582 -- $--
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
------ ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------ ------
<CAPTION>
RETAINED ACCUMULATED
EARNINGS OTHER
(ACCUMULATED COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE
DEFICIT) INCOME (LOSS) (LOSS) TOTALS
------------ ------------- ------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at December 31,
1994........................ $ 115,668 $ (1,011) $ 269,400
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net income.................... 38,600 38,600 38,600
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
reclassification
adjustments(1)............ 3,399 3,399
Foreign currency translation
adjustments............... (4,667) (4,667)
------------ -------------
Other comprehensive income
(loss).................... (1,268) (1,268)
------------ -------------
Comprehensive income (loss)... 37,332
-------------
-------------
Exercise of stock options..... 13,756
Sale of stock to employees
under employee stock
purchase plan............... 6,606
Issuance of stock, net of
costs....................... 7,536
Tax benefits related to stock
options..................... 21,291
Acquisition of STG............ (170) 1,826
------------ ------------- ---------
Balances at December 31,
1995........................ 154,098 (2,279) 357,747
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net loss...................... (73,565) (73,565) (73,565)
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
reclassification
adjustments(1)............ 7,626 7,626
Foreign currency translation
adjustments............... (3,838) (3,838)
------------ -------------
Other comprehensive income
(loss).................... 3,788 3,788
------------ -------------
Comprehensive income (loss)... (69,777)
-------------
-------------
Exercise of stock options..... 13,365
Sale of stock to employees
under employee stock
purchase plan............... 10,992
Acquisition of treasury
stock....................... (2,388)
Reissuance of treasury
stock....................... (1,810) 578
Tax benefits related to stock
options..................... 14,787
------------ ------------- ---------
Balances at December 31,
1996........................ 78,723 1,509 325,304
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net loss...................... (356,867) (356,867) (356,867)
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
reclassification
adjustments(1)............ (12,457) (12,457)
Foreign currency translation
adjustments............... (955) (955)
------------ -------------
Other comprehensive income
(loss).................... (13,412) (13,412)
------------ -------------
Comprehensive income (loss)... (370,279)
-------------
-------------
Exercise of stock options..... 3,574
Sale of stock to employees
under employee stock
purchase plan............... 5,665
Stock-based compensation
expense resulting from stock
options..................... 7,501
Issuance of Series A-1
convertible preferred stock
and warrants, net........... 37,600
Issuance of Series B
convertible preferred stock
and warrants, net........... 49,197
Common stock issued for
services rendered in
connection with the Series B
convertible preferred stock
offering.................... 803
Accrual of 5% cumulative
preferred dividends on
Series B convertible
preferred stock............. (301)
------------ ------------- ---------
Balance at December 31,
1997........................ $(278,144) $(11,903) $ 59,064
------------ ------------- ---------
------------ ------------- ---------
</TABLE>
- ----------------------------------------
(1) Disclosure of reclassification amount for the years ended:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------------- ------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net unrealized gain
(loss) on
available-for-sale
securities arising
during period.......... $ (3,599) $ 9,006 $ 3,399
Less: reclassification
adjustment for net
(gains) losses included
in net income (loss)... (8,858) (1,380) --
------------- ------------- ---------
Net unrealized gain
(loss) on
available-for-sale
securities............. $(12,457) $ 7,626 $ 3,399
------------- ------------- ---------
------------- ------------- ---------
</TABLE>
F-20
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 1--RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Subsequent to the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company
became aware of errors and irregularities that ultimately affected the timing
and dollar amount of reported earned revenues from license transactions in 1996,
1995 and 1994. The irregularities took numerous forms and were primarily the
result of lack of compliance with or circumvention of the Company's procedures
and controls.
These errors and irregularities included unauthorized and undisclosed
arrangements or agreements between Company personnel and resellers, recognition
of revenue on certain transactions in reporting periods prior to contract
acceptance, the recording of certain transactions that lacked economic substance
and the recording of maintenance revenue as license revenue. The unauthorized
and undisclosed agreements with resellers introduced acceptance contingencies,
permitted resellers to return unsold licenses for refunds, extended payment
terms or committed the Company to assist resellers in selling the licenses to
end-users. Accordingly, license revenue from these transactions that was
recorded at the time product was delivered to resellers should have instead been
recorded at the time all conditions on the sale lapsed. Because of the
pervasiveness of the unauthorized arrangements with resellers in the 1994, 1995
and 1996 accounting periods, the Company concluded that all revenue from license
agreements with resellers in these accounting periods, except for those licenses
sold and billed on a per copy basis, should be recognized only when the licenses
were resold or utilized by resellers and all related obligations had been
satisfied. Amounts received from resellers as prepayments of software license
fees in advance of revenue recognition have been recorded as advances from
customers and financial institutions. This revised application of accounting
policy has been followed for all transactions with resellers, other than those
licenses sold and billed on a per-copy basis, for 1996, 1995 and 1994.
Accordingly, such financial statements have been restated as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
AS REPORTED RESTATED AS REPORTED RESTATED AS REPORTED RESTATED
----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues
Licenses................................... $ 708,035 $ 502,730 $ 539,733 $ 462,061 $ 364,661 $ 346,518
Services................................... 231,276 231,810 174,486 174,486 105,451 105,451
----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
939,311 734,540 714,219 636,547 470,112 451,969
Operating income (loss)...................... 137,344 (61,326) 145,826 68,725 95,091 77,229
Income taxes................................. 50,391 12,531 55,164 32,094 34,074 29,250
Net income (loss)............................ 97,818 (73,565) 97,644 38,600 61,948 48,293
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic...................................... $ 0.66 $ (0.49) $ 0.67 $ 0.27 $ 0.45 $ 0.35
Diluted.................................... $ 0.63 (0.49) $ 0.65 $ 0.26 $ 0.43 $ 0.34
Retained earnings............................ $ 322,805 $ 78,723 $ 226,797 $ 154,098 $ 129,323 $ 115,668
Advances from customers and financial
institutions............................... $ -- $ 239,506 $ -- $ 83,553 $ -- $ 18,556
</TABLE>
The nature of the Company's business in 1992 and 1993 was such that there
was not a material amount of revenues recorded under prepaid software license
transactions conducted with resellers during these years. Additionally, as a
result of the Company's extended procedures, there were no material errors
F-21
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 1--RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
or irregularities identified affecting revenues recognized prior to the third
quarter of 1994. The Company concluded based on those circumstances that it was
not necessary to restate the financial statements for 1992 and 1993.
In response to the errors and irregularities discussed above, a number of
conditions which collectively represented a material weakness in the Company's
internal accounting controls were identified. These conditions included a
deterioration in the Company's accounting controls at corporate and regional
management levels, and a related failure to stress the importance of these
controls, an inappropriate level of influence, principally by the Company's
sales organization, over the revenue recognition process and an apparent lack of
clarity and consistent understanding within the Company concerning the
application of the Company's revenue recognition policies to large, complex
reseller license transactions. The Company is implementing a plan to strengthen
the Company's internal accounting controls. This plan includes updating the
Company's policies regarding accounting and reporting for large, complex
reseller license transactions, developing and conducting educational programs to
help implement such policies, changing the Company's corporate and regional
accounting and reporting structure and re-establishing an internal audit
function reporting to the Company's Board of Directors.
NOTE 2--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS. The Company is a multinational supplier of
high-performance, parallel processing database technology for open systems. The
Company's products also include application development tools for creating
client/server production applications, decision-support systems, ad-hoc query
interfaces and software that allows information to be shared transparently from
personal computers to mainframes within the corporate computing environment. In
addition to software products, the Company offers training, consulting and
post-contract support to its customers.
The principal geographic markets for the Company's products are North
America, Europe, Asia/ Pacific, and Latin America. Customers include large-,
medium- and small-sized corporations in the manufacturing, financial services,
telecommunications, retail/wholesale, hospitality and government services
sectors.
USE OF ESTIMATES. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with general accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION. The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Informix Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All
material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION. For foreign operations with the local
currency as the functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at
year-end exchange rates, and statements of operations are translated at the
average exchange rates during the year. Exchange gains or losses arising from
translation of foreign entity financial statements are included as a component
of stockholders' equity.
F-22
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 2--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
For foreign operations with the U.S. dollar as the functional currency,
certain assets and liabilities are remeasured at the year-end or historical
exchange rates as appropriate. Statements of operations are remeasured at the
average exchange rates during the year. Gains and losses resulting from the
remeasurement of the entity's financial statements and other foreign currency
transaction gains and losses are included in other income, net. Foreign currency
transaction gains, net of losses, were $8.0 million, $0.3 million and $0.2
million for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. The Company enters into forward foreign
currency exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk due
to fluctuations in exchange rates underlying the value of firm accounts
receivable and accounts payable denominated in foreign currencies (primarily
European and Asian currencies) until such receivables are collected and payables
are disbursed. A forward foreign currency exchange contract obligates the
Company to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at
specified exchange rates on specified dates or to make an equivalent U.S. dollar
payment equal to the value of such exchange. These forward foreign exchange
contracts, to qualify as hedges of firm commitments, are denominated in the same
currency in which the underlying foreign receivables or payables are denominated
and bear a contract value and maturity date which approximate the value and
expected settlement date of the underlying transactions. For contracts that are
designated and effective as hedges, discounts or premiums (the difference
between the spot exchange rate and the forward exchange rate at inception of the
contract) are accreted or amortized to other expenses over the contract lives
using the straight-line method while unrealized gains and losses on open
contracts at the end of each accounting period resulting from changes in the
spot exchange rate are deferred and recognized in earnings in the same period as
gains and losses on the underlying foreign denominated receivables or payables
are recognized and generally offset. Contract amounts in excess of the carrying
value of the Company's foreign denominated accounts receivable or payable
balances are marked to market, with changes in market value recorded in earnings
as foreign exchange gains or losses. The Company does not enter into forward
foreign currency exchange contracts for speculative or trading purposes. If an
underlying hedged transaction is terminated earlier than initially anticipated,
the offsetting gain or loss on the related forward foreign currency exchange
contract is recognized in earnings in the same period. Subsequent gains or
losses on the related contract would be recognized in earnings in each period
until the contract matures, is terminated, or sold. The Company operates in
certain countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia Pacific where there
are limited forward currency exchange markets and thus the Company has limited
unhedged transaction exposures in these currencies. However, such exposures are
not material to the Company's financial statements for any period presented.
LICENSE REVENUE. The Company recognizes revenue from sales of software
licenses to end-users upon delivery of the software product to a customer when
there are no significant post-delivery obligations and collection of the license
fee is considered probable. Revenue from license agreements with resellers,
except for those licenses sold and billed on a per-copy basis, is recognized as
earned when the licenses are resold or utilized by the reseller and all related
obligations have been satisfied. The Company provides for sales allowances on an
estimated basis.
SERVICE REVENUE. Maintenance contracts generally call for the Company to
provide technical support and software updates to customers. Maintenance
contract revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance
contract, generally on a straight-line basis. Where maintenance revenue is not
separately
F-23
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 2--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
invoiced, it is unbundled from license fees and deferred for revenue recognition
purposes. Other service revenue, primarily training and consulting, is generally
recognized at the time the service is performed.
ADVANCES FROM CUSTOMERS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. At December 31, 1997
and 1996, "advances on unearned license revenue" reflect amounts received from
customers and third-party financial institutions in advance of revenue being
recognized. The Company may receive cash, either from the customer, or from a
financing entity to whom the customer payment streams are sold, prior to the
time the license fee is recognized as earned revenue.
The Company's license agreements with customers provide contractually for a
non-refundable fee payable by the customer in single or multiple installment(s)
at the initiation or over the term of the license arrangement. If the Company
fails to comply with the contractual terms of a specific license agreement, the
Company could be required to refund to the customer or the financial institution
the amount(s) received. These terms require the Company to meet all of its
obligations under the license agreement; to have rights to the software it
licenses; to deliver software that is fully functional according to agreement
specifications; and to represent that the accounts receivable or payment streams
sold to the financial institution are payment obligations under a valid,
authorized, and legally enforceable contract between the Company and customer.
The refund of amounts received would not, however, have a material effect on the
Company's results of operation as revenue has not been recognized for amounts
recorded as "Advances from customers and financial institutions."
SALES OF RECEIVABLES. The Company often finances amounts due from customers
with financial institutions on a non-recourse basis. The Company accounts for
these transactions in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 77, "Reporting by Transferors for Transfers of Receivables with
Recourse" (FAS 77). Effective January 1, 1998 these transactions will be
accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishment of Liabilities" (FAS 125). If at the time of the transfer the
amounts due from the customer have been recognized as revenue and a receivable,
the transfer is accounted for as the sale of a receivable and the receivable is
removed from the books and the financing fees are charged to operations
immediately as interest expense.
SALES OF FUTURE REVENUE STREAMS. If at the time of transfer the amounts due
from the customers have not been recognized as revenue or a receivable, the
transfer is accounted for as the sale of a future revenue stream in accordance
with EITF 88-18. Accordingly, the receipt of cash is treated as a borrowing and
recorded as "advances from customers and financial institutions" and the
financing fees are amortized to interest expense over the term of the financing
arrangement. The Company does not expect to finance amounts due from customers
subsequent to December 31, 1997.
CONCURRENT TRANSACTIONS. Principally during 1996, the Company entered into
software license agreements with certain computer and service vendors where the
Company concurrently committed to acquire goods and services in the aggregate of
approximately $130 million. If the agreement is with a reseller, revenue is
recognized as earned on these transactions as the licenses are resold by the
customer. If the agreement is with an end user, revenue is generally recognized
as earned upon delivery of software. The computer equipment and services are
recorded at their fair value. These concurrent transactions for 1996 included
license agreements of approximately $170 million and commitments to acquire
goods and services in the aggregate of approximately $130 million. Concurrent
transactions in 1997 included software license
F-24
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 2--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
agreements of approximately $21 million and commitments by the Company to
acquire goods and services in the aggregate of approximately $50 million (see
Note 13).
INVENTORIES. Inventories, which consist primarily of software product
components, finished software products, and marketing and promotional materials,
are carried at the lower of cost (first in, first out) or market value, and are
included in other current assets.
SOFTWARE COSTS. The Company capitalizes software development costs incurred
in developing a product once technological feasibility of the product has been
determined. Software costs also include amounts paid for purchased software and
outside development on products which have reached technological feasibility.
All software costs are amortized as a cost of software distribution either on a
straight-line basis over the remaining estimated economic life of the product or
on the basis of each product's projected revenues, whichever results in greater
amortization. Capitalized software costs are generally amortized over three
years. The Company recorded amortization of $21.4 million, $14.6 million, and
$12.0 million of software costs in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, in cost of
software distribution.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT. Depreciation of property and equipment is
calculated using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life,
generally the shorter of the applicable lease term or three-to-seven years for
financial reporting purposes.
BUSINESSES ACQUIRED. The purchase price of businesses acquired, accounted
for as purchased business combinations, is allocated to the tangible and
specifically identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated
fair values with any amount in excess of such allocations being designated as
goodwill. Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives,
which to date have been five to seven years. The carrying values of goodwill and
specified intangible assets are reviewed if the facts and circumstances suggest
that they may be impaired. If this review indicates that the asset will not be
recoverable, as determined based on the undiscounted cash flows of the acquired
business over the remaining amortization period, the Company's carrying value is
reduced to net realizable value. During 1997, the Company wrote down $30.5
million of impaired long-term assets related to the shortfall in business
activity of its Japanese subsidiary (see Note 13). There were no writedowns of
intangible assets in 1996 or 1995. As of December 31, 1997 and 1996, the Company
had $19.2 million and $50.6 million of intangible assets, with accumulated
amortization of $10.9 million and $15.9 million respectively, as a result of
these acquisitions.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK. The Company designs, develops, manufactures,
markets, and supports computer software systems to customers in diversified
industries and in diversified geographic locations. The Company performs ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally requires
no collateral.
No single customer accounted for 10% or more of the consolidated revenues of
the Company in 1997, 1996 or 1995.
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS, AND LONG-TERM
INVESTMENTS. The Company considers liquid investments purchased with a maturity
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company considers
investments with a maturity of more than three months but less than one year to
be short-term investments. Investments with an original maturity of more than
one year are considered long-term
F-25
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 2--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
investments. Short-term and long-term investments are classified as
available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Cash equivalents are carried
at amortized cost.
The Company invests its excess cash in accordance with its short-term and
long-term investments policy, which is approved by the Board of Directors. The
policy authorizes the investment of excess cash in government securities,
municipal bonds, time deposits, certificates of deposit with approved financial
institutions, commercial paper rated A-1/P-1 (a small portion of the portfolio
may consist of commercial paper rated A-2/P-2), and other specific money market
instruments of similar liquidity and credit quality. The Company has not
experienced any significant losses related to these investments.
SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY AND AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE. Management determines
the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and
re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Debt securities are
classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and the
ability to hold the securities until maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are
stated at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts to maturity. Such amortization, as well as any interest on the
securities, is included in interest income.
Marketable equity securities and debt securities not classified as
held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale
securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net
of tax, reported in a separate component of stockholders' equity. The amortized
cost of debt securities in this category is adjusted for amortization of
premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included
in interest income. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be
other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in other
expense, net. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific
identification method. Interest on securities classified as available-for-sale
are included in interest income. The Company realized gross gains of
approximately $8.5 million and $5.2 million and gross losses of approximately
$1.2 million and $1.3 million on the sale of available-for-sale equity
securities during 1997 and 1996, respectively. Realized gains and losses were
not material in 1995.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. Fair values of cash, cash equivalents,
short and long term investments, other assets, and currency forward contracts
are based on quoted market prices.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME. As of January 1, 1998, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 130 (FAS 130), "Reporting Comprehensive
Income." FAS 130 establishes new rules for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components; however, the adoption of this Statement
had no impact on the Company's net income (loss) or stockholders' equity. FAS
130 requires unrealized gains or losses on the Company's available-for-sale
securities and the foreign currency translation adjustments, which prior to
adoption were reported separately in stockholders' equity, to be included in
other comprehensive income. The accompanying financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the requirements of FAS 130.
RECLASSIFICATIONS. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to
conform to the current period presentation.
F-26
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 3--FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following is a summary of available-for-sale debt and equity securities:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES
------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
UNREALIZED UNREALIZED ESTIMATED
COST GAINS LOSSES FAIR VALUE
---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
DECEMBER 31, 1997
U.S. treasury securities......................................... $ 3,701 $ 1 $ -- $ 3,702
Commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes.......... 49,664 18 -- 49,682
Municipal bonds.................................................. 11,903 -- (3) 11,900
Repurchase agreements............................................ 23,262 -- -- 23,262
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
Total debt securities.......................................... $ 88,530 $ 19 $ (3) $ 88,546
U.S. equity securities........................................... 13,309 -- (851) 12,458
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
$ 101,839 $ 19 $ (854) $ 101,004
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents.................... $ 72,460 $ 18 $ (1) $ 72,477
Amounts included in short-term investments....................... 16,070 1 (2) 16,069
Amounts included in other assets................................. 13,309 -- (851) 12,458
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
$ 101,839 $ 19 $ (854) $ 101,004
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
DECEMBER 31, 1996
U.S. treasury securities......................................... $ 61,308 $ -- $ (20) $ 61,288
Commercial paper................................................. 15,872 14 (2) 15,884
Municipal bonds.................................................. 27,317 10 (48) 27,279
Auctioned preferred stock........................................ 4,504 -- (4) 4,500
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
Total debt securities.......................................... 109,001 24 (74) 108,951
U.S. equity securities........................................... 15,404 18,490 -- 33,894
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
$ 124,405 $ 18,514 $ (74) $ 142,845
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents.................... 67,806 -- (6) 67,800
Amounts included in short-term investments....................... 34,548 19 (55) 34,512
Amounts included in long-term investments........................ 6,647 5 (13) 6,639
Amounts included in other assets................................. 15,404 18,490 -- 33,894
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
$ 124,405 $ 18,514 $ (74) $ 142,845
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
---------- ----------- ----- ----------
</TABLE>
NOTE 4--DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts primarily to
hedge the value of accounts receivable or accounts payable denominated in
foreign currencies against fluctuations in exchange rates until such receivables
are collected or payables are disbursed. The purpose of the Company's foreign
exchange exposure management policy and practices is to attempt to minimize the
impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the value of the foreign currency
denominated assets and liabilities being hedged.
F-27
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 4--DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
Substantially all forward foreign exchange contracts entered into by the Company
have maturities of 360 days or less. The Company's practice is to settle all
foreign exchange contracts within ten calendar days of year end and thus there
is no material difference between the contract value and the fair value of the
contracts at December 31, 1997 and 1996. At December 31, 1997 and 1996, the
Company had approximately $102.7 and $168.6 million of forward foreign currency
exchange contracts outstanding, respectively. The table below summarizes by
currency the contractual amounts of the Company's forward foreign exchange
contracts at December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996.
The restatement of the 1996, 1995 and 1994 financial statements resulted in
a change in the Company's foreign currency denominated intercompany accounts
payable and accounts receivable balances. As a result, certain foreign currency
transaction gains and losses realized due to fluctuation in the related asset
and liability currency exchange rates were not offset by underlying gains and
losses on forward foreign currency exchange contracts used to hedge those
foreign currency exposures. The Company recorded net foreign currency
transaction gains and (losses) of approximately $7.5 million, $(0.7) million,
$0.1 million and $(0.5) million in 1997, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, due
to the restatement.
FORWARD CONTRACTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNREALIZED
CONTRACT VALUE GAIN/(LOSS) FAIR VALUE
-------------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
AT DECEMBER 31, 1997
- -----------------------------------------------------
Forward currency contracts sold:
British Pound...................................... $ 55,740 $ 28 $ 241
Deutsche Mark...................................... 17,050 13 (75)
French Franc....................................... 14,139 9 (66)
Italian Lira....................................... 3,901 4 4
Spanish Peseta..................................... 3,166 1 (7)
Swedish Krona...................................... 1,682 2 (3)
Other (individually less than $1 million).......... 2,090 41 47
-------------- ----- -----
Total................................................ $ 97,768 $ 98 $ 141
-------------- ----- -----
-------------- ----- -----
Forward currency contracts purchased:
Swiss Franc........................................ $ 1,636 $ (1) $ 16
Dutch Guilder...................................... 1,096 -- 5
Other (individually less than $1 million).......... 2,208 15 12
-------------- ----- -----
Total................................................ $ 4,940 $ 14 $ 33
-------------- ----- -----
-------------- ----- -----
Grand Total.......................................... $ 102,708 $ 112 $ 174
-------------- ----- -----
-------------- ----- -----
</TABLE>
F-28
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 4--DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNREALIZED
CONTRACT VALUE GAIN/(LOSS) FAIR VALUE
-------------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------
Forward currency contracts sold:
Deutsche Mark...................................... $ 55,815 $ (24) $ 209
Japanese Yen....................................... 41,384 (143) 329
British Pound...................................... 16,051 (12) (42)
French Franc....................................... 8,252 -- 38
Malaysian Ringgit.................................. 5,914 1 (21)
Taiwanese NT....................................... 5,609 (2) (17)
Italian Lira....................................... 4,555 (9) (24)
Singapore Dollar................................... 3,600 (8) 5
Dutch Guilder...................................... 3,558 1 19
Swedish Krona...................................... 2,246 1 8
Swiss Franc........................................ 1,622 1 --
Portuguese Escudo.................................. 1,574 -- (3)
Other (individually less than $1 million).......... 2,240 (1) 1
-------------- ----- -----
Total................................................ $ 152,420 $ (195) $ 502
-------------- ----- -----
-------------- ----- -----
Forward currency contracts purchased:
British Pound...................................... $ 10,501 $ (192) $ (149)
Deutsche Mark...................................... 4,198 6 (16)
Other (individually less than $1 million).......... 1,472 (7) (10)
-------------- ----- -----
Total................................................ $ 16,171 $ (193) $ (175)
-------------- ----- -----
-------------- ----- -----
Grand Total.......................................... $ 168,591 $ (388) $ 327
-------------- ----- -----
-------------- ----- -----
</TABLE>
While the contract amounts provide one measure of the volume of these
transactions, they do not represent the amount of the Company's exposure to
credit risk. The amounts (arising from the possible inabilities of
counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts) are generally limited to
the amounts, if any, by which the counterparties' obligations exceed the
obligations of the Company. The Company controls credit risk through credit
approvals, limits and monitoring procedures.
As of December 31, 1997, other than foreign forward exchange contracts
discussed immediately above, the Company does not currently invest in or hold
any other derivative financial instruments.
NOTE 5--NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (FAS 128), "Earnings per Share." FAS
128 supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15 (APB 15), "Earnings
per Share," and other related Interpretations and is effective for the periods
ending after December 15, 1997. Under FAS 128, basic earnings per share are
computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings per common
F-29
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 5--NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE (CONTINUED)
share includes the incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of
stock options, warrants, and convertible preferred stock, when the effect is
dilutive. As required by FAS 128, all prior year net income (loss) per share
amounts have been restated.
The following table sets forth computation of basic and diluted net income
(loss) per common share:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)......................... $ (356,867) $ (73,565) $ 38,600
Preferred stock dividends................. (301) -- --
Value assigned to warrants................ (1,601) -- --
-------------- -------------- --------------
Numerator for basic and diluted net income
(loss) per common share................. $ (358,769) $ (73,565) $ 38,600
-------------- -------------- --------------
Denominator:
Denominator for basic net income (loss)
per common share-- weighted-average
shares.................................. 151,907,041 149,310,000 145,062,000
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options.................. -- -- 5,565,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
Denominator for diluted net income (loss)
per common share--adjusted
weighted-average shares and assumed
conversions............................. 151,907,041 149,310,000 150,627,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
-------------- -------------- --------------
Basic net income (loss) per common share.... $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.27
Diluted net income (loss) per common
share..................................... $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.26
-------------- -------------- --------------
-------------- -------------- --------------
</TABLE>
Weighted average employee stock options to acquire 4,776,124 and 6,263,000
were outstanding in fiscal 1997 and 1996, respectively, but were not included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was
antidilutive. In addition, at December 31, 1997, 8,341,238 shares of convertible
preferred stock were also excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per
share because the effect was antidilutive. See Notes 6 and 7.
NOTE 6--PREFERRED STOCK
In August 1997, the Company sold 160,000 shares of newly issued Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock, face value $250 per share, which shares are
generally not entitled to vote on corporate matters, to a private investor for
aggregate net proceeds of $37.6 million and issued a warrant to the same
investor to purchase up to an additional 140,000 shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock at an aggregate purchase price of up to $35 million. In November
1997, the Company canceled the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange
for the same number of shares of a substantially identical Series A-1
F-30
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 6--PREFERRED STOCK (CONTINUED)
Convertible Stock (the "A-1 Preferred") issued to the same investor, with a
corresponding change to the warrant shares. The warrant may be exercised from
August 13, 1997 through April 15, 1999.
The Series A-1 Preferred shares are convertible into common shares at any
time, at the holder's option, at a per share price equal to 101% of the average
price of the Company's common stock for the 30 days ending five trading days
prior to conversion, but not greater than the lesser of (i) 105% of the common
stock's average price of the first five trading days of such thirty day period,
or (ii) $12 per share. If not converted prior, the A-1 Preferred will
automatically convert into common shares eighteen months after their issuance,
subject to extension of the automatic conversion date in certain defined
circumstances of default. However, if at the time of conversion, the aggregate
number of shares of common stock already issued and to be issued as a result of
the conversion of the shares of the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock were
to exceed 19.9% of the total number of shares of then outstanding common stock,
then such excess does not convert unless or until stockholder approval is
obtained.
The mandatory redemption provisions of the new A-1 Preferred differ from the
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The redemption provisions in the A-1
Preferred effectively preclude the Company from having to redeem the preferred
stock except by actions solely within its control. Accordingly, the Consolidated
Balance Sheet reflects the A-1 Preferred under stockholder's equity. On February
13, 1998, the Series A-1 convertible preferred stockholders exercised their
conversion privileges. See Note 17-- Subsequent Events.
In November 1997, the Company sold 50,000 shares of newly issued Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred"), face value $1,000 per share,
which shares are generally not entitled to vote on corporate matters, to private
investors for aggregate proceeds of $50.0 million (excluding a $1.0 million fee
paid to a financial advisor of the Company). In connection with the sale, the
Company also agreed to issue a warrant to such investors upon conversion of such
Series B Preferred to purchase 20% of the shares of Common Stock but no less
than 1,500,000 shares at a per share exercise price which is presently
indeterminable and will depend on the trading price of the Common Stock of the
Company in the period prior to the conversion of the Series B Preferred. The
Company also agreed to issue additional warrants to purchase up to an aggregate
of 200,000 shares at a per share exercise price which is presently
indeterminable and will depend on the trading price of the Common Stock of the
Company in the period prior to the conversion of the Series B Preferred. The
Series B Preferred is convertible at the election of the holder into shares of
Common Stock beginning six months after issuance, and upon the occurrence of
certain events, including a merger. The Series B Preferred will automatically
convert into Common Stock three years following the date of its issuance. Each
Series B Preferred share is convertible into the number of shares of Common
Stock at a per share price equal to the lowest of (i) the average of the closing
prices for the Common Stock for the 22 days immediately prior to the 180th day
following the initial issuance date, (ii) 101% of the average closing price for
the 22 trading days prior to the date of actual conversions, or (iii) 101% of
the lowest closing price for the Common Stock during the five trading days
immediately prior to the date of actual conversion. The conversion price of the
Series B Preferred is subject to modification and adjustment upon the occurrence
of certain events. The Series B Preferred accrues cumulative dividends at an
annual rate of 5% of per share face value. The dividend is generally payable
upon the conversion or redemption of the Series B Preferred, and may be paid in
cash or, at the holder's election, in shares of Common Stock. The Series B is
junior to the Company's outstanding Series A-1 Preferred in respect to the right
to receive dividend payments and liquidation preferences.
F-31
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 6--PREFERRED STOCK (CONTINUED)
The Company reserved 26.0 million shares of Common Stock for issuance upon
conversion of the A-1 Preferred (including shares of A-1 Preferred issuable upon
exercise of the Series A-1 Warrant). Of those 26.0 million shares, the Company
issued 12.8 million shares in February 1998 in connection with the conversion of
220,000 shares of A-1 Preferred (see Note 17). The Company has reserved 22.8
million shares of Common Stock for issuance upon conversion of the Series B
Preferred and upon exercise of the Series B Warrants.
The fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the A-1 Preferred
and Series B Preferred are deemed to be a discount to the conversion price of
the respective equity instruments available to the preferred stockholders. The
discounts are being recognized as a return to the preferred stockholders
(similar to a dividend) over the minimum period during which the preferred
stockholders can realize this return, immediate for the A-1 Preferred and six
months for the Series B Preferred. The portion of the discount applicable to
fiscal 1997 has been accreted to additional paid in capital (accumulated
deficit) in the Company's December 31, 1997 financial statements and has been
disclosed as a decrease in the amount available to common stockholders on the
face of the statement of operations and for purposes of computing net income
(loss) per share. The fair value assigned to the warrants is based on an
independent appraisal performed by a nationally recognized investment banking
firm. The appraisal was completed utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model.
This model requires assumptions related to the remaining life of the warrant,
the risk free interest rate at the time of issuance, stock volatility, and an
illiquidity factor associated with the security. These assumptions and the
values assigned to the Series A-1 and Series B Warrants were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SERIES A-1 SERIES B
------------------------------ ------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Volatility.................... 0.4 0.6
Expected life................. 18 months 24 months
Risk free interest rate....... 5.6% 5.6%
Dividend yield................ 0% 0%
Illiquidity discount.......... 33% 33%
Exercise price................ $7.59 $9.73
Assigned value................ $0.9 million $2.7 million
</TABLE>
In connection with the issuance of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
in November 1997, the Company paid a fee of $1,000,000 for financial advisory
services provided in connection with such financing. In addition, the Company
issued 100,000 shares of its Common Stock, and also agreed to issue a warrant to
purchase an additional 50,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock to the
service provider in the event that, as of May 17, 1998, the trading price of the
Company's Common Stock is less than $12.50 per share. Such warrant will be
exercisable according to the same terms as the warrants issued in connection
with the issuance of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.
NOTE 7--STOCK-BASED BENEFIT PLANS
OPTION PLANS
Under the Company's 1986 Employee Stock Option Plan, options are granted at
fair market value on the date of the grant. Options are generally exercisable in
cumulative annual installments over three to five
F-32
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 7--STOCK-BASED BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
years. Payment for shares purchased upon exercise of options may be by cash or,
with Board approval, by full recourse promissory note or by exchange of shares
of the Company's common stock at fair market value on the exercise date.
Unissued options under the 1986 Plan expired on July 29, 1996, which was 10
years after adoption of the plan.
Additionally, 1,600,000 shares were authorized for issuance under the 1989
Outside Directors Stock Option Plan, whereby non-employee directors are
automatically granted non-qualified stock options upon election or re-election
to the Board of Directors. At December 31, 1997, 645,000 shares were available
for grant under this Plan.
In April 1994, the Company adopted the 1994 Stock Option and Award Plan;
8,000,000 shares were authorized for grant under this Plan. Options can be
granted to employees on terms substantially equivalent to those described above.
The 1994 Stock Option and Award Plan also allows the Company to award
performance shares of the Company's common stock to be paid to recipients on the
achievement of certain performance goals set with respect to each recipient. In
May 1997, the Company's stockholders approved an additional 8,000,000 shares to
be reserved for issuance under the Company's 1994 Stock Option and Award Plan.
At December 31, 1997, 4,009,476 shares were available for grant under this Plan.
In July 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved a resolution
authorizing the grant of a maximum of 500,000 non-statutory stock options to
executives and other employees, as determined by the Board, under the newly
created 1997 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan ("the 1997 Stock Plan"). The
authorization of such shares for grant under the 1997 Stock Plan is not subject
to stockholder approval. Terms of each option are determined by the Board or
committee delegated such duties by the Board. Concurrent with the authorization
of the 1997 Stock Plan, the Board granted the Company's current chief executive
officer 500,000 options to purchase the Company's common stock thereunder. Such
options vest ratably over five years beginning with the first anniversary of the
date of grant.
In September 1997, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repricing
of outstanding options to purchase Common Stock under the Company's stock option
plans. Employees were eligible to participate only if they remained actively
employed at the effective date of the repricing and were only permitted to
exchange options granted and outstanding prior to May 1, 1997. The
repricing/option exchange was effective November 21, 1997 (the "Repricing
Effective Date"). The repricing program offered eligible employees the
opportunity to exchange eligible outstanding options with exercise prices in
excess of the closing sales price of the Company's Common Stock on the Repricing
Effective Date for a new option with an exercise price equal to such price.
Other than the exercise price, each new option issued upon exchange has terms
substantially equivalent to the surrendered option, including the number of
shares, vesting terms and expiration except that options issued in connection
with the exchange may not be exercised for a period of one year from the
Repricing Effective Date. In addition, officers of the Company participating in
the option exchange were required to forfeit 20% of the shares subject to each
option being surrendered. The exercise price for repriced options was $7.1563,
the closing sales price of the Company's Common Stock on the Repricing Effective
Date.
F-33
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 7--STOCK-BASED BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
Following is a summary of activity for all stock option plans for the three
years ended December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OPTIONS
OF SHARES PRICE PER SHARE
------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at December 31, 1994............................ 15,013,772 $ 0.06 to $14.44
Options granted and assumed................................. 5,456,927 0.19 to 34.00
Options exercised........................................... (3,852,697) 0.19 to 13.88
Options canceled............................................ (864,920) 0.06 to 32.75
------------- -----------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1995............................ 15,753,082 $ 0.06 to $34.00
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
PRICE
------------
<S> <C> <C>
Options granted and assumed..................................... 5,850,225 $ 24.3456
Options exercised............................................... (2,927,260) 4.6069
Options canceled................................................ (1,561,800) 17.1483
------------- ------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1996................................ 17,114,247 $ 13.4495
Options granted and assumed..................................... 13,137,338 8.5926
Options exercised............................................... (1,132,484) 2.9266
Options canceled................................................ (10,008,150) 18.8573
------------- ------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1997................................ 19,110,951 $ 7.9906
------------- ------------
------------- ------------
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at
December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NUMBER
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED EXERCISABLE WEIGHTED
NUMBER AVERAGE AVERAGE AT AVERAGE
OUTSTANDING AT REMAINING EXERCISE DECEMBER 31, EXERCISE
RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES DECEMBER 31, 1997 CONTRACTUAL LIFE PRICE 1997 PRICE
- ----------------------------- ----------------- ------------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------
$0.2000-$0.3900.............. 843,276 7.19 $ 0.2927 843,275 $ 0.2927
$0.4844-$1.7800.............. 942,176 2.40 $ 0.7486 942,176 $ 0.7486
$1.8906-$4.2188.............. 1,711,539 4.35 $ 3.6708 1,707,139 $ 3.6696
$4.2500-$7.1563.............. 5,531,029 8.43 $ 7.0768 58,728 $ 5.6288
$7.2500-$7.5000.............. 1,350,140 7.19 $ 7.4560 845,890 $ 7.4929
$7.5625-$8.6250.............. 1,577,025 5.34 $ 8.6010 1,541,875 $ 8.6050
$8.6875-$9.7813.............. 4,148,565 9.33 $ 9.0885 158,500 $ 9.7069
$9.9063-$18.2500............. 2,438,057 8.61 $ 12.7550 779,961 $ 16.1924
$18.5625-$24.5000............ 489,921 8.24 $ 23.4102 342,310 $ 23.4008
$24.6250-$34.2500............ 79,223 7.97 $ 30.4673 67,723 $ 30.6235
----------------- --- ------------- ------------- ---------------
$0.2000-$34.2500............. 19,110,951 7.58 $ 7.9906 7,287,577 $ 7.0538
----------------- --- ------------- ------------- ---------------
----------------- --- ------------- ------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
In connection with all stock option plans, 23,765,427 shares of Common Stock
were reserved for issuance as of December 31, 1997, and 7,287,577 options were
exercisable. At December 31, 1996, 18,750,708 shares of common stock were
reserved for issuance, and 7,988,176 options were exercisable.
F-34
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 7--STOCK-BASED BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company also has a qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) under
which 7,600,000 shares of common stock, in the aggregate, have been authorized
for issuance. Under the terms of the Plan, employees may contribute, through
payroll deductions, up to 10 percent of their base pay and purchase up to 500
shares per quarter (with the limitation of purchases of $25,000 annually in fair
market value of the shares). Employees may elect to withdraw from the Plan
during any quarter and have their contributions for the period returned to them.
Also, employees may elect to reduce the rate of contribution one time in each
quarter. The price at which employees may purchase shares is 85 percent of the
lower of the fair market value of the stock at the beginning or end of the
quarter. The Plan is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended. During 1997, 1996 and 1995 the Company issued 573,343 shares,
616,128 shares and 347,743 shares, respectively, under this Plan. The Plan was
terminated on July 1, 1997, which was 10 years after the offering date for the
Plan's first offering period.
In May 1997, the Company's stockholders approved the 1997 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the "1997 ESPP"). The Company has reserved 4,000,000 shares of
Common Stock for issuance under the 1997 ESPP. The 1997 ESPP permits
participants to purchase Common Stock through payroll deductions of up to 15
percent of an employee's compensation, including commissions, overtime, bonuses
and other incentive compensation. The price of Common Stock purchased under the
1997 ESPP is equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of the
Common Stock at the beginning or at the end of each quarter in which an eligible
employee participates. The Plan qualifies as an employee stock purchase plan
under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As of
December 31, 1997, the Company has not issued any shares of Common Stock under
the 1997 ESPP.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
As permitted under FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" (FASB 123), the Company has elected to continue to follow
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" (APB 25) in accounting for stock-based awards to employees. Under APB
25, the Company generally recognizes no compensation expense with respect to
such awards.
Pro forma information regarding the net income (loss) and earnings per share
(loss) is required by FASB 123 for awards granted or modified after December 31,
1994 as if the Company had accounted for its stock based awards to employees
under the fair value method of FASB 123. The fair value of the Company's
stock-based awards to employees was estimated using a Black-Scholes option
pricing model.
The fair value of the Company's stock-based awards was estimated assuming no
expected dividends and the following weighted-average assumptions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS ESPP
--------------------------------- ----------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1997 1996 1995
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Expected life (years)............................... 4.5 years 4.5 years 4.5 years .25 years .25 years .25 years
Expected volatility (percent)....................... .7900 .5822-.6327 .5642-.6239 .5066-.8954 .5765-.9662 .4170-.7295
Risk-free interest rate (percent)................... 5.71 5.20-6.09 5.82-7.72 5.23-5.40 5.01-5.85 5.49-6.07
</TABLE>
For pro forma purposes, the estimated fair value of the Company's stock
based awards is amortized over the award's vesting period (for options) and the
three month purchase period (for stock purchases
F-35
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 7--STOCK-BASED BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
under the ESPP). The Company's pro forma information follows (in thousands
except for per share information):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income (loss)..................................................... As reported $(358,769) $ (73,565) $ 38,600
Pro forma (387,594) (94,196) 28,652
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic............................................................... As reported $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.27
Pro forma (2.55) (0.63) 0.20
Diluted............................................................. As reported $ (2.36) $ (0.49) $ 0.26
Pro forma (2.55) (0.63) 0.19
</TABLE>
Calculated under FASB 123, the weighted-average fair value of the options
granted during fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995 was $5.26, $13.04 and $10.39 per
share, respectively. The weighted average fair value of employee stock purchase
rights granted under the ESPP during 1997, 1996 and 1995 were $3.83, $7.47 and
$5.27, respectively.
401(K) PLAN
The Company has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all of its U.S.
employees. Under this plan, participating employees may defer up to 15 percent
of their pre-tax earnings, subject to the Internal Revenue Service annual
contribution limits. In fiscal 1997, the Company matched 50 percent of each
employee's contribution up to a maximum of $2,000. The Company's matching
contributions to this 401(k) plan for 1997, 1996 and 1995 were $4.2 million,
$3.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively.
NOTE 8--COMMITMENTS
The Company leases certain computer and office equipment under capital
leases having terms of three-to-five years. Amounts capitalized for such leases
are included on the consolidated balance sheets as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1997 1996
------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
Computer equipment............................................... $ 6,939 $ 8,825
Office equipment................................................. 349 2,474
------ ------------
7,288 11,299
1,489 8,985
------ ------------
Less: accumulated amortization................................... $ 5,799 $ 2,314
------ ------------
------ ------------
</TABLE>
During fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995, the Company financed approximately $10.5
million, $1.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of equipment purchases
under capital lease arrangements. Amortization with respect to leased equipment
is included in depreciation expense.
F-36
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 8--COMMITMENTS (CONTINUED)
The Company leases certain of its office facilities and equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases and total rent expense was $34.7 million, $42.4
million and $19.7 million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
In November 1996, the Company leased approximately 200,000 square feet of
office space in Santa Clara, California. The lease term is for fifteen years and
minimum lease payments amount to $96.0 million over the term. The minimum lease
payments increase within a contractual range based on changes in the Consumer
Price Index. In the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company assigned the lease to an
unrelated third party. The Company remains contingently liable for minimum lease
payments under this assignment.
Future minimum payments, by year and in the aggregate, under the capital and
non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 1997, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NON-CANCELABLE
CAPITAL OPERATING
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 LEASES LEASES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
1998............................................................... $ 4,838 $ 34,329
1999............................................................... 3,904 26,944
2000............................................................... 1,887 21,430
2001............................................................... -- 17,427
2002............................................................... -- 12,875
Thereafter......................................................... -- 4,364
--------- --------------
Total payments..................................................... 10,629 $ 117,369
--------------
--------------
Less: amount representing interest................................. 1,185
---------
Present value of minimum lease payments............................ 9,444
Less current portion............................................... 3,627
---------
$ 5,817
---------
---------
</TABLE>
As of December 31, 1997, the Company was contractually obligated to purchase
approximately $4.4 million of various computer equipment.
The Company has several active software development and service provider
contracts with third-party technology providers. These agreements contain
financial commitments by the Company of $15.1 million, $11.4 million, $10.4
million, $7.3 million and $3.5 million in fiscal 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and
2002, respectively.
F-37
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 9--GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Net revenues, operating income, and identifiable assets for the Company's
North American, European, Asia/Pacific and Latin American operations are
summarized below by year:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LATIN
NORTH AMERICA EUROPE ASIA/PACIFIC AMERICA ELIMINATIONS TOTAL
-------------- ---------- ----------- --------- ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
1997:
Net revenues.............................. $ 358,532 $ 220,654 $ 81,129 $ 50,064 $ (46,487) $ 663,892
Operating income (loss)................... (227,783) (78,005) (49,067) 3,541 (4,428) (355,742)
Identifiable assets....................... 555,476 130,174 61,875 38,948 (223,229) 563,244
1996:
Net revenues.............................. $ 413,604 $ 233,224 $ 93,622 $ 50,829 $ (56,741) $ 734,538
Operating income (loss)................... (35,276) (20,520) (11,576) 4,693 1,353 (61,326)
Identifiable assets....................... 734,852 218,196 101,203 44,803 (217,058) 881,996
1995:
Net revenues.............................. $ 367,373 $ 201,762 $ 80,667 $ 39,549 $ (52,804) $ 636,547
Operating income (loss)................... 70,971 (537) (3,005) 2,045 (749) 68,725
Identifiable assets....................... 579,306 216,530 85,158 25,618 (224,699) 681,913
</TABLE>
Sales and transfers between geographic areas are accounted for at prices
which the Company believes are arm's length prices, and which in general are in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the respective governing tax
authorities.
Export revenues consisting of sales from the Company's U.S. operating
subsidiary to non-affiliated customers were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
Canada........................................................ $ 2,033 $ 7,521 $ 6,299
Latin America................................................. 4,494 6,556 6,817
Asia/Pacific.................................................. 11 3,391 5,887
Other......................................................... 364 3,437 1,301
--------- --------- ---------
Total......................................................... $ 6,902 $ 20,905 $ 20,304
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
F-38
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 10--INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes applicable to income (loss) before income
taxes consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
--------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
Currently payable:
Federal................................................... $ (2,264) $ 1,540 $ 40,582
State..................................................... -- 565 6,463
Foreign................................................... 10,415 6,216 9,325
--------- ---------- ----------
$ 8,151 $ 8,321 $ 56,370
--------- ---------- ----------
--------- ---------- ----------
Deferred:
Federal................................................... $ (3,857) $ (1,748) $ (13,747)
State..................................................... (189) (2,983) (1,204)
Foreign................................................... 3,712 8,941 (9,325)
--------- ---------- ----------
(334) 4,210 (24,276)
--------- ---------- ----------
$ 7,817 $ 12,531 $ 32,094
--------- ---------- ----------
--------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
In 1996 and 1995, the Company recognized tax benefits related to stock
option plans of $14.8 million and $21.3 million, respectively. Such benefits
were recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. Income (loss) before
income taxes consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
----------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
Domestic................................................. $ (227,266) $ (26,510) $ 83,937
Foreign.................................................. (121,784) (34,524) (13,243)
----------- ---------- ----------
$ (349,050) $ (61,034) $ 70,694
----------- ---------- ----------
----------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying
the federal statutory income tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. The
sources and tax effects of the differences are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---------------------- ---------------------- ------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Computed tax at federal statutory rate................. $(122,167) (35.0)% $ (21,362) (35.0)% $ 24,743 35.0%
Valuation allowance.................................... 116,978 33.5% 41,192 67.5% 4,239 6.0%
Research and development credits....................... -- -- (1,457) (2.4)% (935) (1.3)%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit......... -- -- (1,572) (2.6)% 3,418 4.8%
Foreign taxes.......................................... 10,415 3.0% -- -- -- --
Other, net............................................. 2,591 0.7% (4,270) (7.0)% 629 0.9%
--------- ----- --------- ----- ----------- ---
$ 7,817 2.2% $ 12,531 20.5% $ 32,094 45.4%
--------- ----- --------- ----- ----------- ---
--------- ----- --------- ----- ----------- ---
</TABLE>
F-39
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 10--INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of
the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 1997 and
1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:
Reserves and accrued expenses........................................ $ 13,457 $ 7,703
Deferred revenue..................................................... 34,786 33,875
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards............................. 77,149 38,067
Domestic net operating loss carryforwards............................ 93,003 9,800
Foreign taxes in excess of taxes at U.S. rate........................ 7,682 9,014
Valuation of investment portfolio under FAS 115...................... 307 --
Other................................................................ 1,632 555
----------- ----------
Total deferred tax assets............................................ 228,016 99,014
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.......................... (178,353) (46,339)
----------- ----------
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance...................... 49,663 52,675
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES:
Capitalized software................................................. 14,051 17,704
Revenue recognition.................................................. 1,612 1,612
Valuation of investment portfolio FAS 115............................ -- 6,454
----------- ----------
Total deferred tax liabilities....................................... 15,663 25,770
----------- ----------
Net deferred tax assets.............................................. $ 34,000 $ 26,905
----------- ----------
----------- ----------
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1997, the Company had approximately $220.4 million, $237.2
million and $159.3 million of foreign, federal and state net operating loss
carryforwards. The foreign and state net operating loss carryovers expire at
various dates beginning in 1999. The federal net operating loss carryovers
expire at various dates beginning in 2007. Income taxes paid amounted to $11.3
million, $22.7 million and $18.6 million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased by $132.0 million,
$41.2 million and $4.2 million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
NOTE 11--BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
In February 1996, the Company acquired Illustra Information Technologies,
Inc. (Illustra), a company that provides dynamic content management database
software and tools for managing complex data in the Internet,
multimedia/entertainment, financial services, earth sciences and other markets.
Approximately 12.7 million shares of Informix common stock were issued to
acquire all outstanding shares of Illustra common stock. An additional 2.3
million shares of Informix common stock were reserved for issuance in connection
the assumption of Illustra's outstanding stock options and warrants. The
transaction has been accounted for as a pooling of interests, and accordingly,
the consolidated financial statements for all prior periods presented have been
restated to include the accounts and operations of Illustra as if the merger
F-40
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 11--BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (CONTINUED)
was consummated at the beginning of the earliest period presented. Merger fees
of approximately $5.9 million were recorded in the first quarter of 1996. The
following table presents the separate operating results for Informix Corporation
and Illustra for the periods prior to the acquisition date (because the
operating results of Illustra for the period January 1, 1996 to the effective
date of the merger were immaterial to the combined Company, for the purposes of
this table an acquisition date of January 1, 1996 is assumed).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
(IN
THOUSANDS)
-------------
<S> <C>
Income Statement
Net revenues
Informix..................................................................... $ 631,313
Illustra..................................................................... 5,234
-------------
Combined..................................................................... $ 636,547
-------------
-------------
Net income (loss)
Informix..................................................................... $ 46,289
Illustra..................................................................... (7,689)
-------------
Combined..................................................................... $ 38,600
-------------
-------------
</TABLE>
In January 1995, the Company acquired a 90 percent interest in the database
division of ASCII Corporation ("ASCII"), a distributor of its products in Japan.
The Company acquired the remaining 10 percent interest in January 1996. The
total purchase price, which consisted of cash and direct acquisition costs, was
approximately $46.0 million, of which approximately $35.4 million exceeded the
net tangible assets acquired. Intangible assets acquired included customer
lists, sales and marketing workforce, business tradenames, and goodwill. These
intangible assets are being amortized over seven years.
In April 1995, the Company acquired an 80 percent interest in the database
division of Daou Corporation ("Daou"), a distributor of its products in Korea.
The Company acquired the remaining 20 percent interest in January 1997. The
total purchase price, which consisted of cash and direct acquisition costs, was
approximately $7.6 million, of which approximately $7.0 million exceeded the net
tangible assets acquired. Intangible assets acquired included customer lists,
sales and marketing workforce, business tradenames, and goodwill. These
intangible assets are being amortized over seven years.
In February 1997, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of CenterView Software, Inc. ("CenterView"), a privately-owned company which
develops and sells software application development tools. The aggregate
purchase price paid was approximately $8.7 million, which included cash plus
direct costs of acquisition. The transaction has been accounted for as a
purchase and, based on an independent appraisal of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, the purchase price has been allocated to the net tangible
and intangible assets acquired including developed software technology, acquired
workforce, in-process technology, and goodwill. The in-process technology, which
based on the independent appraisal has been valued at $7 million, had not, at
the date of acquisition, reached technological feasibility and had no
alternative future uses in other research and development projects.
Consequently, its value was charged to operations in the period the acquisition
was consummated (the first quarter of 1997). The remaining identifiable
intangible assets are being amortized over three to five years.
F-41
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 11--BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (CONTINUED)
The operating results of these businesses have not been material in relation
to those of the Company and are included in the Company's consolidated results
of operations from the date of acquisition.
NOTE 12--LITIGATION
Commencing in April 1997, a series of class action lawsuits purportedly by
or on behalf of stockholders and a separate but related stockholder action were
filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California. These actions name as defendants the Company, certain of its present
and former officers and directors and, in some cases, its former independent
accountants. The complaints allege various violations of the federal securities
laws and seek unspecified but potentially significant damages. Similar actions
were also filed in California state court and in Newfoundland, Canada.
Stockholder derivative actions, purportedly on behalf of the Company and
naming virtually the same individual defendants and the Company's independent
accountants, were also filed, commencing in August 1997, in California state
court. While these actions allege various violations of state law, any monetary
judgments in these derivative actions would accrue to the benefit of the
Company.
Pursuant to Delaware law and certain indemnification agreements between the
Company and each of its current and former officers and directors, the Company
is obligated to indemnify its current and former officers and directors for
certain liabilities arising from their employment with or service to the
Company. This includes the costs of defending against the claims asserted in the
above-referenced actions and any amounts paid in settlement or other disposition
of such actions on behalf of these individuals. The Company's obligations do not
permit or require it to provide such indemnification to any such individual who
is adjudicated to be liable for fraudulent or criminal conduct. Although the
Company has purchased directors' and officers' liability insurance to reimburse
it for the costs of indemnification for its directors and officers, the coverage
under its policies is limited. Moreover, although the directors' and officers'
insurance coverage presumes that 100 percent of the costs incurred in defending
claims asserted jointly against the Company and its current and former directors
and officers are allocable to the individuals' defense, the Company does not
have insurance to cover the costs of its own defense or to cover any liability
for any claims asserted against it. The Company has not set aside any financial
reserves relating to any of the above-referenced actions.
The pending federal and state securities actions are in the early stages of
discovery. Consequently, at this time it is not reasonably possible to estimate
the damages, or the range of damages, that the Company might incur in connection
with such actions.
In addition, in July 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a
formal order of investigation of the Company and certain unidentified
individuals associated with the Company with respect to non-specified accounting
matters, public disclosures and trading activity in the Company's securities.
The Company is cooperating with the investigation and is providing all
information subpoenaed by the Commission.
NOTE 13--NONRECURRING CHARGES
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 121
(FAS121), "Accounting for the Impairment of Long Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to be Disposed of", the Company records impairment losses on long-lived
assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate
F-42
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 13--NONRECURRING CHARGES (CONTINUED)
that the assets might be impaired and the estimated future undiscounted cash
flows to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying
amounts. During the first quarter of 1997, the Company's Japanese subsidiary
experienced a significant shortfall in business activity compared to historical
levels. Accordingly, the Company evaluated the ongoing value of the subsidiary's
long-lived assets (primarily computer and other equipment) and related goodwill.
Based on this evaluation, the Company determined that the subsidiary's assets
had been impaired and wrote them down by $30.5 million to their estimated fair
values. Fair value was determined using estimated future discounted cash flows
and/or resale market quotes as appropriate.
In February 1997 the Company acquired CenterView Software (see Note 11) and,
as a direct result, revised its database application tool business strategy to
incorporate CenterView's developed technology and "Data Director" product. This
revision to the tools business strategy significantly altered the Company's
current and future marketing plans for its own NewEra family of application
tools including projected future NewEra product revenues. As a result, the
Company reevaluated the net realizable value of its NewEra products and found it
to be significantly below the net balance of related capitalized software
development costs. Accordingly, the Company recorded a charge during the first
quarter 1997 of $14.7 million to reduce the carrying value of these capitalized
product development costs to the revised estimated net realizable value of the
NewEra products.
In June and again in September 1997, the Company approved plans to
restructure its operations to bring expenses in line with forecasted revenues.
In connection with the restructurings, the Company substantially reduced its
worldwide headcount and consolidated facilities and operations to improve
efficiency. The following analysis sets forth the significant components of the
restructuring reserve at December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RESTRUCTURING NON-CASH CASH ACCRUAL BALANCE AT
EXPENSE COSTS PAYMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1997
------------- ----------- ----------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
Severance and benefits................................... $ 21.9 $ -- $ 19.5 $ 2.4
Write-off of assets...................................... 48.2 48.2 -- --
Facility charges......................................... 34.7 7.7 3.8 23.2
Other.................................................... 3.4 2.2 .2 1.0
------ ----- ----- -----
$ 108.2 $ 58.1 $ 23.5 $ 26.6
------ ----- ----- -----
------ ----- ----- -----
</TABLE>
Severance and related costs represented the reduction of approximately 670
employees, primarily sales and marketing personnel, on a worldwide basis.
Temporary employees and contractors were also reduced. Write-off of assets
include the write-off or write-down in carrying value of equipment as a result
of the Company's decision to reduce the number of Information Superstores
throughout the world, as well as the write-off of equipment associated with
headcount reductions. The equipment subject to the write-offs and write-downs
consists primarily of computer servers, workstations, and personal computers
that will no longer be utilized in the Company's operations. These assets were
written down to their fair value less cost to sell. The carrying value at
December 31, 1997, of computer equipment included in the restructuring
activities during the second and third quarters of 1997 and intended to be
disposed of, is approximately $2.2 million. Facility charges included early
termination costs associated with the closing of certain domestic and
international sales offices.
F-43
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 13--NONRECURRING CHARGES (CONTINUED)
The total restructuring expense decreased by $1.2 million during the fourth
quarter of 1997 primarily due to adjusting the original estimate of the loss to
be incurred on the sale of land to the actual loss.
The Company expects to complete most of the actions associated with its
restructuring by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 1998.
NOTE 14--SENIOR SECURED CREDIT AGREEMENT
In December 1997, the Company entered into a Senior Secured Credit Agreement
with a syndicate of commercial banks, providing for a revolving credit facility
of up to $75 million (the "Credit Facility"). The actual amount available under
the Credit Facility, for either direct borrowings or issuances of letters of
credit, is based on certain eligibility criteria. As a result, the aggregate
amount available under the Credit Facility will vary from time to time based on
the amount and eligibility of the Company's receivables. As of December 31,
1997, no borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility, the Company's
net accounts receivable totaled $142 million and its borrowing base under the
Credit Facility was $47 million. The term of the Credit Facility is two years
and is secured by all of the assets of Informix Software and the capital stock
of the Company's domestic subsidiaries. The availability of the Credit Facility
is subject to the Company's compliance with certain covenants, including the
following financial covenants requiring the Company to: (a) maintain a ratio of
1.25 to 1.00 in respect of the sum of cash and accounts receivable to the
difference of current liabilities less deferred and unearned revenues, (b)
maintain quarterly revenues of $150 million through June 1998 and $160 million
thereafter, (c) maintain quarterly operating loss of no more than $10 million
through the quarter ending March 31, 1998 and a quarterly operating profit of at
least $10 million for the quarter ending June 30, 1998 and a quarterly operating
profit of at least $15 million thereafter, (d) maintain, for the quarter ending
June 30, 1998 and each quarter thereafter, a positive quarterly cash flow
consisting of operating income which does not include any restated revenue
resulting from the Company's November 1997 restatement of its financial
statements, capitalized software costs, capital expenditures or cash outlays in
respect of accrued expenses arising from restructuring charges (but which income
figure does take into account depreciation and amortization expenses), (e)
maintain an interest coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00 in respect of quarterly
operating cash flow to interest expense plus scheduled amortization of debt, (f)
refrain from making additional investments in fixed or capital assets, in any
fiscal year, in excess of $15 million, plus any carry forward amount which carry
forward amount cannot exceed $5 million and (g) refrain from entering into any
merger, consolidation, reorganization or other transaction resulting in a
fundamental change. At December 31, 1997, the Company was in compliance with all
financial covenants under the Credit Facility.
F-44
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 15--SUMMARY QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER (3) THIRD QUARTER (3) FOURTH QUARTER (3)
---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AS REPORTED RESTATED AS REPORTED RESTATED AS REPORTED RESTATED AS REPORTED RESTATED
----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year ended December 31, 1997
Net revenues............... $ 133,664 $ 149,902 $ 182,012 $ 182,527 $ 149,911 $ 150,184 $ 181,152 $ 181,279
Gross profit (2)........... 63,185 79,616 123,527 124,042 97,625 97,898 132,266 132,393
Net income (loss) (1)(2)... (140,107) (144,161) (111,377) -- (110,523) -- 9,194 --
Preferred stock dividend... -- -- -- -- -- -- (301) --
Value assigned to
warrants................. -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,601) --
----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
Net income (loss)
applicable to common
stockholders............. (140,107) (144,161) (111,377) -- (110,523) -- 7,292 --
Net income (loss) per
common share:
Basic.................... $ (0.93) $ (0.95) $ (0.73) $ -- $ (0.73) $ -- $ 0.05 $ --
Diluted.................. (0.93) (0.95) (0.73) -- (0.73) -- 0.04 --
Year ended December 31, 1996
Net revenues............... $ 204,021 $ 164,985 $ 226,282 $ 160,290 $ 238,180 $ 190,600 $ 270,828 $ 218,665
Gross profit............... 160,584 121,758 178,474 113,041 189,003 141,619 218,342 166,486
Net income (loss).......... 15,891 (15,377) 21,628 (34,083) 26,181 (17,095) 34,118 (7,010)
Net income (loss) per
share:
Basic.................... $ 0.11 $ (0.10) $ 0.15 $ (0.23) $ 0.17 $ (0.11) $ 0.23 $ (0.05)
Diluted.................. 0.10 (0.10) 0.14 (0.23) 0.17 (0.11) 0.22 (0.05)
Year ended December 31, 1995
Net revenues............... $ 148,037 $ 146,325 $ 164,068 $ 142,381 $ 182,701 $ 168,002 $ 219,413 $ 179,839
Gross profit............... 121,839 120,343 134,042 112,432 150,183 137,668 178,396 136,971
Net income (loss).......... 17,646 16,177 20,184 (2,731) 23,896 7,759 35,918 17,372
Net income (loss) per
share:
Basic.................... $ 0.12 $ 0.11 $ 0.14 $ (0.02) $ 0.16 $ 0.05 $ 0.24 $ 0.12
Diluted.................. 0.12 0.11 0.14 (0.02) 0.16 0.05 0.23 0.11
Year ended December 31, 1994
Net revenues............... $ 96,242 $ 92,763 $ 106,214 $ 96,217 $ 117,081 $ 111,428 $ 150,575 $ 151,561
Gross profit............... 81,429 77,950 89,765 79,768 98,106 92,453 129,520 130,506
Net income (loss).......... 11,540 8,922 12,210 4,686 15,446 11,191 22,752 23,494
Net income (loss) per
share:
Basic.................... $ 0.09 $ 0.07 $ 0.09 $ 0.03 $ 0.11 $ 0.08 $ 0.16 $ 0.17
Diluted.................. 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.03 0.11 0.08 0.16 0.16
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) The Company recorded in the second quarter and again in the third quarter of
1997, restructuring charges of $59.6 million and $49.7 million,
respectively. The total restructuring expense decreased by $1.2 million
during the fourth quarter of 1997 primarily due to adjusting the original
estimate of the loss to be incurred on the sale of land to the actual loss.
(See Note 13)
(2) In the first quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a charge of $30.5 million
to write down the carrying values of certain of its Japanese subsidiary's
long-lived assets to their fair values. During the same quarter, the Company
also recorded a charge of $14.7 million to write down the carrying value of
capitalized software development costs for certain products to their net
realizable values.
(3) The second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 1997 were restated for the
reclassification of interest expense on sold receivables to interest expense
from net revenues.
F-45
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 16--RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
In 1997, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued
Statement of Position 97-2 (SOP 97-2), "Software Revenue Recognition" as amended
by Statement of Position 98-4 (SOP 98-4). The Company will be required to adopt
the provisions of the SOPs' as of January 1, 1998. The adoption may, in certain
circumstances, result in the deferral of software license revenues that would
have been recognized upon delivery of the related software under preceding
accounting standards. In response to these SOPs', the Company will likely change
its business practices, and, consequently, the Company cannot quantify the
effect the SOPs' will have on its operating results, financial position or cash
flows.
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No.
131, Disclosures About Segments of An Enterprise and Related Information (FAS
No. 131). FAS No. 131 will require the Company to use the "management approach"
in disclosing segment information. The statement is effective for the Company
during 1998. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FAS No. 131 will
have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
NOTE 17--SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
In December 1997, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a second
option repricing to be effective January 9, 1998 (the "Second Repricing
Effective Date") based upon the closing sales price of the Company's Common
Stock as of the Second Repricing Effective Date. Under the terms of the second
repricing, each employee, excluding officers and directors of the Company, could
exchange any option outstanding as of May 1, 1997 for a new option with an
exercise price equal to the closing sales price on the Second Repricing
Effective Date. Options exchanged in the second repricing may not be exercised
for a period of one year from the Second Repricing Effective Date. The exercise
price for repriced options was $5.094, the closing sales price of the Company's
Common Stock on the Repricing Effective Date.
On February 13, 1998, the A-1 Preferred Stockholders exercised warrants to
purchase 60,000 additional shares of A-1 Preferred at $250 per share for net
proceeds to the Company of $14.1 million, and simultaneously converted 220,000
shares of A-1 Preferred into 12,769,908 shares of the Company's common stock.
On June 10, 1998, a holder of the Series B Preferred Stock converted 500
shares of Series B Preferred into 80,008 shares of the Company's Common Stock.
In connection with such conversion, the Company also issued such Series B
Preferred Stockholder a warrant to purchase up to 66,000 shares of Common Stock
at a purchase price of $7.84 per share. Also, during the quarter ended June 30,
1998, the Company issued a warrant pursuant to provisions of the Series B
Preferred to purchase up to an additional 50,000 shares of Common Stock at a
purchase price of $7.84 per share to a financial advisor of the Company because,
as of May 15, 1998, the closing sales price of the Company's common stock was
less than $12.50. Such warrant was issued in connection with services provided
by such financial advisor related to the sale of shares of the Series B
Preferred in November 1997.
In July 1998, the Company adopted its 1998 Non-Statutory Option Plan under
which it reserved 5,500,000 shares of its Common Stock for issuance to employees
and consultants of the Company other than executive officers and directors.
During September 1998, holders of the Series B Preferred Stock converted a
total of 13,500 shares of Series B Preferred into 3,679,472 shares of the
Company's Common Stock. In connection with such
F-46
<PAGE>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
NOTE 17--SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
conversions, the Company also issued such Series B Preferred Stockholders
warrants to purchase up to 885,891 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of
$7.84 per share.
During October 1998, holders of the Series B Preferred converted an
additional 3,850 shares of Series B Preferred into 974,461 shares of common
stock of Informix. In connection with such conversions, Informix also issued
such Series B Preferred stockholders warrants to purchase up to 194,890 shares
of common stock of Informix, at an exercise price of $7.84 per share and paid
cash dividends in the amount of $174,945 to such stockholders.
F-47
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents......................................................... $ 7,357 $ 12,358
Short-term investments............................................................ 9,775 14,551
Accounts receivable, net.......................................................... 6,443 12,291
Prepaid expenses and other current assets......................................... 1,238 955
------------- ------------
Total current assets............................................................ 24,813 40,155
Property and equipment, net......................................................... 3,734 2,677
Intangible assets, net.............................................................. 224 361
Deposits and other assets........................................................... 399 372
------------- ------------
Total assets.................................................................. $ 29,170 $ 43,565
------------- ------------
------------- ------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:................................................................
Accounts payable.................................................................. $ 353 $ 518
Accrued expenses.................................................................. 3,378 3,719
Accrued compensation.............................................................. 2,343 2,031
Deferred revenue.................................................................. 6,895 7,370
Capital lease obligations due within one year..................................... 163 385
------------- ------------
Total current liabilities....................................................... 13,132 14,023
Capital lease obligations........................................................... 21 60
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock...................................................................... 1 1
Additional paid-in capital........................................................ 57,562 56,055
Accumulated deficit............................................................... (41,536) (26,530)
Accumulated other comprehensive income............................................ 4 26
------------- ------------
16,031 29,552
Notes receivable from stockholders................................................ (14) (70)
------------- ------------
Total stockholders' equity...................................................... 16,017 29,482
------------- ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................................... $ 29,170 $ 43,565
------------- ------------
------------- ------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
F-48
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1998 1997
---------- ----------
Revenues:
Software license........................................................................ $ 11,860 $ 19,189
Maintenance and service................................................................. 13,296 9,434
---------- ----------
Total revenues........................................................................ 25,156 28,623
---------- ----------
Cost of revenues:
Software license........................................................................ 1,457 1,139
Maintenance and service................................................................. 7,616 6,164
---------- ----------
Total cost of revenues................................................................ 9,073 7,303
---------- ----------
Gross margin........................................................................ 16,083 21,320
---------- ----------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing..................................................................... 19,061 19,813
Research and development................................................................ 9,503 7,130
General and administrative.............................................................. 3,104 3,019
In-process technology................................................................... -- 10,984
---------- ----------
Total operating expenses.............................................................. 31,668 40,946
---------- ----------
Loss from operations................................................................ (15,585) (19,626)
Interest and other income (expense), net.................................................. 992 1,398
---------- ----------
Loss before provision for income taxes and minority interest............................ (14,593) (18,228)
Provision for income taxes................................................................ 413 305
---------- ----------
Loss before minority interest........................................................... (15,006) (18,533)
Minority interest......................................................................... -- 96
---------- ----------
Net loss............................................................................ $ (15,006) $ (18,437)
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
Basic loss per share...................................................................... $ (1.20) $ (1.61)
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
Diluted loss per share.................................................................... $ (1.20) $ (1.61)
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
Shares used to compute basic loss per share............................................... 12,473 11,463
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
Shares used to compute diluted loss per share............................................. 12,473 11,463
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
F-49
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1998 1997
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss................................................................................ $ (15,006) $ (18,437)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
Depreciation.......................................................................... 1,461 1,269
Amortization.......................................................................... 137 --
In-process technology................................................................. -- 10,984
Minority interest in subsidiary....................................................... -- (36)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable................................................................. 5,848 5,365
Prepaid expenses and other current assets........................................... (283) 418
Accounts payable.................................................................... (165) 716
Accrued expenses and compensation................................................... (29) 717
Deferred revenue.................................................................... (475) 553
---------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities............................... (8,512) 1,549
---------- ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments..................................................... (10,658) (18,990)
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments........................................... 15,434 25,978
Acquisition of property and equipment................................................... (2,413) (1,109)
Acquisition of certain assets and technology............................................ -- (9,543)
Deposits and other assets............................................................... (27) (96)
---------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities............................... 2,336 (3,760)
---------- ----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs........................... 1,507 2,662
Proceeds from notes receivable.......................................................... 56 33
Principal payments on capital lease obligations......................................... (366) (555)
Change in other accumulated comprehensive income........................................ (22) (13)
---------- ----------
Net cash provided by financing activities......................................... 1,175 2,127
---------- ----------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents................................................. (5,001) (84)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period.......................................... 12,358 14,552
---------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period................................................ $ 7,357 $ 14,468
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
F-50
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein
reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, which in
the opinion of management are necessary to fairly present the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the
periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the Company's audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The consolidated results of operations for the
nine months ended September 30, 1998, are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for any subsequent period or for the year ended December
31, 1998.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Such estimates are related to the useful lives of fixed
assets, allowances for doubtful accounts, other reserves, and income tax
valuation allowances. Actual results inevitably will differ from those
estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 1998
presentation.
2. NET LOSS PER SHARE
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards board issued Statement
No. 128, "Earnings per Share" ("SFAS 128"), which is effective for both interim
and annual financial periods ended after December 15, 1997. SFAS 128 replaced
the previously reported primary and fully diluted earnings per share with basic
and diluted earnings per share. Unlike primary earnings per share, basic
earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and
convertible securities. Due to the Company's net loss in each period presented,
diluted loss per share does not include stock options and warrants as they are
antidilutive. Diluted earnings per share is similar to the previously reported
fully diluted earnings per share. All earnings per share amounts for all periods
have been presented, and where necessary, restated to conform to the SFAS 128
requirements.
3. RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS
As of January 1, 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" ("FAS 130"). FAS 130
establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and
its components; however, the adoption of FAS 130 had no material impact on the
Company's net loss or stockholders' equity. Total comprehensive loss for the
nine month period ended September 30, 1998, amounted to approximately $15.0
million. Total comprehensive loss for the nine month period ended September 30,
1997, amounted to approximately $18.5 million.
As of January 1, 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information" ("FAS 131"). FAS 131 changes the way companies report selected
segment information in annual financial statements and also requires those
companies to report selected segment information in interim financial reports to
stockholders. The Company has not yet reached a conclusion as to the appropriate
segments, if any, it will be required to report to comply with FAS 131.
In October 1997, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
issued Statement of Position No. 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition" ("SOP
97-2"), which superseded SOP 91-1 and provides
F-51
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)
guidance on generally accepted accounting principles for recognizing revenue on
software transactions. SOP 97-2 requires that revenue recognized from software
arrangements be allocated to each element of the arrangement based on the
relative fair values of the elements, such as software products, upgrades,
enhancements, post contract customer support, installation, or training. Under
SOP 97-2, the determination of fair value is based on objective evidence which
is specific to the vendor. If such evidence of fair value for each element of
the arrangement does not exist, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred
until such time that evidence of fair value does exist or until all elements of
the arrangement are delivered. SOP 97-2 was amended in February 1998 by
Statement of Position 98-4 (SOP 98-4) "Deferral of the Effective Date of a
Provision of SOP 97-2" which deferred for one year the specification of what was
considered vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for the various
elements in a multiple element arrangement. The Company has adopted the
provisions of these SOPs as of January 1, 1998.
4. LITIGATION
On March 25, 1998, certain Red Brick stockholders acting on behalf of
themselves and other persons who purchased Red Brick's common stock between
January 15, 1997 and April 15, 1997, filed two purported class action lawsuits
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On
May 28, 1998, the Court consolidated the two lawsuits into one action. On
September 2, 1998, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Class Action Complaint for
the consolidated action (the "Amended Complaint"). The Amended Complaint names
as defendants, among others, Red Brick and certain of its present and former
officers and directors. The complaint alleges violations of the federal
securities laws and seeks unspecified monetary damages. Red Brick believes that
the Amended Complaint is without merit and, on October 7, 1998, Red Brick filed
a motion to dismiss the complaint. A hearing on the motion to dismiss is
tentatively scheduled for December 15, 1998. The pending litigation against Red
Brick, and any future litigation against Red Brick or its employees, may result
in substantial costs and expenses to Red Brick, even if Red Brick prevails in
its case or settles the litigation. Such costs may include a significant
diversion of time and effort by Red Brick's technical and management personnel.
Red Brick could be materially adversely affected by an unfavorable resolution of
such litigation. Depending on their breadth and timing, pending litigation and
any future litigation against Red Brick could have a material adverse effect on
Red Brick's business, future results of operation, cash flows, or financial
condition.
From time to time, the Company may be a party to litigation and claims
incident to the ordinary course of its business. Although the results of
litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes
that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect
on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
5. PURCHASE OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND TECHNOLOGY
On August 29, 1997, the Company executed a technology purchase agreement
with CMG Information Services, Inc. ("CMGI") and its wholly owned subsidiary,
Engage Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Engage"), whereby the
Company acquired the source code and related documentation to the Engage
software technology "Engage.Fusion" and "Engage.Discover," and such products'
shared, object-oriented, metadata facility, all of which were then technology
under development. In the third quarter of 1997 the Company recorded a charge of
approximately $11.0 million for in-process technology based upon independent
appraisal. The Company paid CMGI $9.5 million in cash and issued to CMGI 238,160
shares
F-52
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. PURCHASE OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND TECHNOLOGY (CONTINUED)
of unregistered common stock. As of the time of its acquisition, the acquired
technology had not yet reached technological feasibility and did not have
alternative future uses.
6. ROYALTIES
In July 1998, the Company signed a five-year, mutual reseller and cross-
licensing agreement with Engage, including its parent company CMGI and CMGI's
majority-owned subsidiaries. The cross-license is royalty bearing for the Engage
products that are sublicensed by the Company. The terms of the agreement
required the Company to pay Engage minimum nonrefundable royalties during the
years 1998 through 2000. See also Note 9.
In addition, the Company is obligated to make minimum license royalty
payments under the terms of its developer/reseller agreement with BMC Software,
Inc. ("BMC"). The license is royalty bearing for the products that are
sublicensed by the Company. The Company is required to make these minimum
royalty payments during the years 1998 through 1999.
7. RED BRICK AUSTRALASIA PTY. LTD.
Prior to September 16, 1998, the Company held a controlling interest in Red
Brick Australasia Pty. Ltd., ("RBA") and RBA's financial results were
consolidated with the Company's financial statements. On September 16, 1998, the
Company terminated the joint venture agreement between the Company and
Productivity Software Group Limited ("PSG") dated July 1, 1996, sold capital
shares of RBA to PSG and entered into an International Distributor Agreement
with RBA. The Company currently holds ordinary shares in RBA equivalent to
approximately 10% of RBA's outstanding capital stock. Accordingly, the Company
will no longer consolidate the financial results of RBA. In addition, the
Company agreed with RBA that RBA, which is majority owned by PSG, would satisfy
its outstanding debt obligations to the Company.
8. REPRICING
In August 1998, the Company offered employees, excluding executive officers,
the option to exchange options to purchase 1,038,691 shares of common stock with
an aggregate exercise price of $7,683,236 for new options to purchase 1,038,691
shares with an exercise price of $2.31 per share and an aggregate exercise price
of $2,401,973. All options that were repriced begin vesting six months after the
vesting start date under the original terms of the option grant.
9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In October 1998, the Company and Engage mutually agreed to terminate the
mutual reseller agreement. In addition, the Company agreed to pay additional
minimum nonrefundable royalties in connection with the cross-licensing
agreement. The total amount of minimum nonrefundable royalties to be paid to
Engage, including amounts from the July agreement discussed in Note 6, is $3.1
million. As of October 30, 1998, $1.5 million has been paid.
In October 1998, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization with Informix Corporation ("Informix") providing for the merger
of the Company with a subsidiary of Informix such that the Company would become
a wholly owned subsidiary of Informix. Under the terms of the agreement, upon
the consummation of the merger, each share of the Company's common stock will be
exchanged for
F-53
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (CONTINUED)
0.6 share of Informix common stock. The transaction will be accounted for as a
purchase. Consummation of the merger is conditional on regulatory and
stockholder approval and the satisfaction of other closing conditions.
The Company has experienced a reduction in license revenues, continued
losses from operations and substantial cash used in operating activities. The
Company's future success depends on its ability to enhance its current products,
to develop and introduce new products that keep pace with technological
developments and emerging industry standards on a timely basis and to
successfully market and license such products. The Company believes that its
current cash and investment balances are sufficient to meet anticipated working
capital and capital expenditure requirements through at least December 31, 1998.
Thereafter, the Company's ability to meet its goals above will depend upon the
ability of management to raise additional capital to fund operations, increase
revenues by introducing new products and increasing marketing efforts, and
reduce spending. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
raise additional capital, increase revenues or reduce spending. The Company's
inability to raise additional capital, increase revenues or reduce spending
would have a material adverse affect on the Company's financial condition and
results of operations.
F-54
<PAGE>
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Red Brick
Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Since the date of completion of our audit of the accompanying financial
statements and initial issuance of our report thereon dated January 13, 1998,
the Company, as discussed in the second paragraph of Note 12, has experienced a
reduction in license revenues, continued losses from operations and substantial
cash used in operating activities which adversely affect the Company's current
results of operations and liquidity. The second paragraph of Note 12 describes
management's plans to address these issues.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Red Brick Systems, Inc. at December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
January 13, 1998, except for the second
paragraph of Note 12, as to which
the date is November 16, 1998
F-55
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1997 1996
---------- ---------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................................................ $ 12,358 $ 14,552
Short-term investments................................................................... 14,551 20,599
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,553 in 1997 and $958 in 1996................ 12,291 13,106
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................................................ 955 1,213
Deferred tax assets...................................................................... -- 850
---------- ---------
Total current assets................................................................... 40,155 50,320
Property and equipment, net................................................................ 2,677 2,693
Intangible assets, net..................................................................... 361 --
Other assets............................................................................... 372 205
Deferred tax assets........................................................................ -- 150
---------- ---------
Total assets........................................................................... $ 43,565 $ 53,368
---------- ---------
---------- ---------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable......................................................................... $ 518 $ 316
Accrued expenses......................................................................... 3,719 2,565
Accrued compensation..................................................................... 2,031 2,191
Deferred revenue......................................................................... 7,370 4,180
Capital lease obligations due within one year............................................ 385 760
---------- ---------
Total current liabilities.............................................................. 14,023 10,012
Capital lease obligations.................................................................. 60 396
Minority interest.......................................................................... -- 36
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding........ -- --
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000 shares authorized; 12,233 and 11,346 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively............................ 1 1
Additional paid-in capital............................................................... 56,055 51,570
Accumulated deficit...................................................................... (26,530) (8,507)
Deferred compensation.................................................................... -- (36)
Translation adjustment................................................................... 26 4
---------- ---------
29,552 43,032
Notes receivable from stockholders....................................................... (70) (108)
---------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity............................................................. 29,482 42,924
---------- ---------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............................................. $ 43,565 $ 53,368
---------- ---------
---------- ---------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-56
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1997 1996 1995
---------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Software License.............................................................. $ 29,234 $ 29,242 $ 15,742
Maintenance and service....................................................... 14,081 6,793 4,863
---------- --------- ---------
Total revenues.............................................................. 43,315 36,035 20,605
Cost of revenues:
Software license.............................................................. 1,503 1,136 685
Maintenance and service....................................................... 8,438 3,357 1,615
---------- --------- ---------
Total cost of revenues...................................................... 9,941 4,493 2,300
---------- --------- ---------
Gross margin.............................................................. 33,374 31,542 18,305
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing........................................................... 26,955 20,410 11,011
Research and development...................................................... 9,960 6,256 5,033
General and administrative.................................................... 4,192 2,839 1,682
In-process technology......................................................... 10,984 500 --
---------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses.................................................... 52,091 30,005 17,726
---------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) from operations............................................. (18,717) 1,537 579
Interest and other income (expense), net........................................ 1,767 1,509 (128)
---------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes and minority
interest.................................................................... (16,950) 3,046 451
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes....................................... 1,203 (687) 143
---------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before minority interest........................................ (18,153) 3,733 308
Minority interest in net loss of consolidated subsidiary........................ 130 85 --
---------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss)............................................................. $ (18,023) $ 3,818 $ 308
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
Basic earnings (loss) per share................................................. $ (1.55) $ 0.37 $ 0.22
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
Diluted earnings (loss) per share............................................... $ (1.55) $ 0.30 $ 0.04
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
Shares used to compute basic earnings (loss) per share.......................... 11,663 10,357 1,407
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
Shares used to compute diluted earnings (loss) per share........................ 11,663 12,643 8,635
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-57
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1997 1996 1995
---------- ---------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)............................................................. $ (18,023) $ 3,818 $ 308
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Depreciation................................................................ 1,692 1,433 857
Amortization................................................................ 45 -- --
Deferred taxes.............................................................. 1,000 (1,000) --
In-process technology....................................................... 10,984 -- --
Minority interest in subsidiary............................................. (36) 36 --
Other....................................................................... -- -- 36
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable....................................................... 815 (7,595) (2,871)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................................. 258 (920) (219)
Accounts payable.......................................................... 202 (342) 495
Accrued expenses and compensation......................................... 956 2,247 1,318
Deferred revenue.......................................................... 3,190 2,165 872
---------- ---------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities................... 1,083 (158) 796
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments........................................... (22,295) (50,906) --
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments................................. 28,343 30,307 --
Acquisition of property and equipment......................................... (1,676) (1,748) (85)
Acquisition of certain assets................................................. (9,543) -- --
Deposits and other assets..................................................... (167) (10) (27)
---------- ---------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities............................... (5,338) (22,357) (112)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs................. 2,712 35,300 320
Principle payments on capital lease obligations............................... (711) (1,271) (713)
Other......................................................................... 60 40 749
---------- ---------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities........................... 2,061 34,069 356
---------- ---------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents............................ (2,194) 11,554 1,040
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year.................................. 14,552 2,998 1,958
---------- ---------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year........................................ $ 12,358 $ 14,552 $ 2,998
---------- ---------- ---------
---------- ---------- ---------
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest...................................................................... $ 90 $ 233 $ 222
Income taxes.................................................................. $ 163 $ 114 $ 54
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Property and equipment acquired under capital lease financings.................. $ -- $ 385 $ 1,082
Common stock issued in purchase of certain assets and technology................ $ 1,773 $ -- $ --
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-58
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED
STOCK COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL
------------------------ ------------------------ PAID- IN ACCUMULATED
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1994................. 5,450 $ 1 1,378 $ -- $ 15,018 $ (12,633)
Issuance of Common Stock................... -- -- 220 -- 70 --
Exercise of stock options.................. -- -- 1,017 -- 250 --
Repurchase of common stock................. -- -- (59) -- (12) --
Sale of preferred stock on exercise of
warrants................................. 413 -- -- -- 859 --
Deferred compensation...................... -- -- -- -- 55 --
Amortization of deferred compensation...... -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock warrants in
connection with the sale of note
receivable............................... -- -- -- -- 30 --
Note receivable payment.................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Net income................................. -- -- -- -- -- 308
----------- ----- ----------- --- ------- ------------
Balance at December 31, 1995................. 5,863 1 2,556 -- 16,270 (12,325)
Conversion of preferred stock to common
stock.................................... (5,863) (1) 5,863 1 -- --
Net exercise of warrants................... -- -- 264 -- -- --
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance
costs.................................... -- -- 2,070 -- 33,684 --
Exercise of stock options, net of
repurchases.............................. -- -- 217 -- 244 --
ESPP distribution.......................... -- -- 90 -- 1,372 --
Sale of common stock on exercise of
warrants................................. -- -- 286 -- -- --
Amortization of deferred compensation...... -- -- -- -- -- --
Translation adjustment..................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Note receivable payment.................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Net income................................. -- -- -- -- -- 3,818
----------- ----- ----------- --- ------- ------------
Balance at December 31, 1996................. -- -- 11,346 1 51,570 (8,507)
Exercise of stock options, net of
repurchases.............................. -- -- 435 -- 566 --
ESPP distribution.......................... -- -- 214 -- 2,146 --
Issuance of common stock for purchase of
technology............................... -- -- 238 -- 1,773 --
Amortization of deferred compensation...... -- -- -- -- -- --
Translation adjustment..................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Note receivable payment.................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss................................... -- -- -- -- -- (18,023)
----------- ----- ----------- --- ------- ------------
Balance at December 31, 1997................. -- $ -- 12,233 $ 1 $ 56,055 $ (26,530)
----------- ----- ----------- --- ------- ------------
----------- ----- ----------- --- ------- ------------
<CAPTION>
NOTES TOTAL
DEFERRED TRANSLATION RECEIVABLE FROM STOCKHOLDERS'
COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
--------------- --------------- ----------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1994................. $ -- $ -- $ (124) $ 2,262
Issuance of Common Stock................... -- -- (70) --
Exercise of stock options.................. -- -- -- 250
Repurchase of common stock................. -- -- -- (12)
Sale of preferred stock on exercise of
warrants................................. -- -- -- 859
Deferred compensation...................... (55) -- -- --
Amortization of deferred compensation...... 6 -- -- 6
Issuance of common stock warrants in
connection with the sale of note
receivable............................... -- -- -- 30
Note receivable payment.................... -- -- 17 17
Net income................................. -- -- -- 308
----- --- ----- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1995................. (49) -- (177) 3,720
Conversion of preferred stock to common
stock.................................... -- -- -- --
Net exercise of warrants................... -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance
costs.................................... -- -- -- 33,684
Exercise of stock options, net of
repurchases.............................. -- -- -- 244
ESPP distribution.......................... -- -- -- 1,372
Sale of common stock on exercise of
warrants................................. -- -- -- --
Amortization of deferred compensation...... 13 -- -- 13
Translation adjustment..................... -- 4 -- 4
Note receivable payment.................... -- -- 69 69
Net income................................. -- -- -- 3,818
----- --- ----- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1996................. (36) 4 (108) 42,924
Exercise of stock options, net of
repurchases.............................. -- -- -- 566
ESPP distribution.......................... -- -- -- 2,146
Issuance of common stock for purchase of
technology............................... -- -- -- 1,773
Amortization of deferred compensation...... 36 -- -- 36
Translation adjustment..................... -- 22 -- 22
Note receivable payment.................... -- -- 38 38
Net loss................................... -- -- -- (18,023)
----- --- ----- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1997................. $ -- $ 26 $ (70) $ 29,482
----- --- ----- -------------
----- --- ----- -------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-59
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ORGANIZATION
Red Brick Systems, Inc. (the Company), a Delaware corporation, was
originally incorporated in California in July 1986. The Company designs,
develops, markets and supports a high performance client/ server relational
database management system and related software and services specifically
designed for data warehouse applications.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, as well as Red Brick Systems
Australasia Pty. Ltd. ("RBA"). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Such estimates are related to the useful lives of fixed
assets, allowances for doubtful accounts and customer returns, other reserves,
and income tax valuation allowances. Actual results inevitably will differ from
those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial
statements.
RED BRICK SYSTEMS AUSTRALASIA PTY. LTD.
On July 1, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with Productivity
Software Group Limited ("PSG") to form a joint venture to distribute the
Company's products and services in Australia and New Zealand. The Company owns
approximately 50.1% of the voting stock of the joint venture and is
consolidating this entity. The minority interest shown on the financial
statements represents PSG's proportionate share in the net assets and operating
activity of the Australian subsidiary. Beginning in 1999, the Company may be
obligated to purchase the remaining stock owned by PSG at a pre-determined price
based on 1998 revenue for the joint venture, not to exceed $5 million.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The functional currency of the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries is the
U.S. dollar. Subsidiary financial statements are remeasured into U.S. dollars
for consolidation. Foreign currency translation gains and losses are included in
other income (expense) and were immaterial for all periods presented. The
functional currency of RBA is the Australian dollar. Translation gains or losses
are shown as a component of stockholders' equity.
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Management determines the appropriate classifications of debt securities at
the time of purchase. All of the Company's debt securities are classified as
available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value,
with the unrealized gains and losses reported in a separate component of
stockholders' equity. The fair value of the Company's available for sale
securities is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet dates. As of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, unrealized gains or losses on such investments were
not significant. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be
other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in interest
income. The cost of securities sold is based on the
F-60
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
specific identification method. Interest on securities classified as
available-for-sale is included in interest income.
All cash equivalents, by contractual maturity, mature in three months or
less. Short-term investments mature in three to fifteen months. The fair value
of the Company's investments held at December 31, 1997 and 1996, is summarized
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FAIR VALUE AT
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1997 1996
--------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Money market............................................................ $ 37 $ 52
Corporate bonds and notes............................................... 6,115 15,412
Commercial paper........................................................ 5,757 12,195
Certificates of deposit................................................. 3,001 --
Government debt securities.............................................. 8,211 4,200
International bond...................................................... 999 750
--------- ---------
Total investments................................................... $ 24,120 $ 32,609
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
The following is a reconciliation of the Company's investments to the
balance sheet classifications:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FAIR VALUE AT
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1997 1996
--------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents........................... $ 9,569 $ 12,010
Short-term investments.................................................. 14,551 20,599
--------- ---------
Total investments................................................... 24,120 32,609
Demand deposits......................................................... 2,789 2,542
--------- ---------
Total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments................ $ 26,909 $ 35,151
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1997, $16,997,000 of the investments were due in one year or
less, with the remainder due in one year to fifteen months.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, generally three to five years. Assets acquired under
capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line
method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the terms
of the leases.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets related to the technology purchase agreement with CMGI and
Engage in August 1997, include an assembled workforce and goodwill. The
intangible assets are being amortized on a
F-61
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
straight-line basis over periods ranging from 2 to 3 years. Accumulated
amortization was approximately $45,000 at December 31, 1997.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position No. 91-1, "Software Revenue
Recognition." Revenue from product licensing and the portion of royalty revenues
not subject to future obligations is generally recognized after execution of a
licensing agreement and shipment of the product, provided that no significant
vendor obligations remain and the resulting receivable is deemed collectible by
management. Maintenance and service revenue includes maintenance, training, and
consulting. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the
contract. Service revenues, primarily consulting and training, are recognized at
the time the service is performed. Revenue under software development agreements
is recognized using the percentage-of-completion method based on the ratio that
incurred costs bear to total estimated costs.
In 1997, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued
Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition." SOP 97-2
will be effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 1998. SOP 97-2 supersedes
SOP 91-1, and addresses software revenue recognition matters primarily from a
conceptual level and does not include specific implementation guidance. Detailed
implementation guidelines have not yet been issued. The Company is evaluating
the requirements of the new SOP and potential implementation guidelines and the
effects, if any, on the Company's current revenue recognition policy.
WARRANTY
The Company provides for the costs of warranty when specific problems are
identified. The Company has not experienced significant warranty claims to date.
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Software development costs have been accounted for in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, "Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed" ("FAS 86"). Under
the standard, capitalization of software development costs begins upon the
establishment of technological feasibility, subject to net realizable value
considerations. In the Company's case, capitalization would begin upon
completion of a working model as the Company does not prepare detail program
designs as part of the development process. As of December 31, 1997, such
capitalizable costs were insignificant. Accordingly, the Company has charged all
such costs to research and development expenses in the accompanying statements
of operations.
ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock-based awards because, as
discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," ("FAS 123") requires use of option valuation models that were not
developed for use in valuing employee stock-based awards. Under APB 25, the
Company generally recognizes no compensation expense with respect to such
awards.
F-62
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
ADVERTISING COSTS
The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred. Advertising
expenses for 1997, 1996 and 1995 were $1,164,000, $668,000, and $349,000,
respectively.
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" ("FAS 128"). FAS 128 replaced the calculation of
primary and fully diluted earnings per share with basic and diluted earnings per
share. Unlike primary earnings per share, basic earnings per share excludes any
dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted
earnings per share is very similar to the previously reported fully diluted
earnings per share. Also in 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 98 ("SAB 98"). SAB 98 affected the treatment of
certain stock and warrants ("cheap stock") issued within a one-year period prior
to an initial public offering. Earnings (loss) per share amounts for all periods
have been presented and where appropriate, restated to conform to the FAS 128
and SAB No. 98 requirements.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
---------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE
DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Numerator:
Net Income (loss)................................. $ (18,023) $ 3,818 $ 308
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding........ 11,663 10,357 1,407
---------- --------- ---------
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share... 11,663 10,357 1,407
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options and warrants............... -- 1,644 979
Convertible preferred stock....................... -- 337 5,450
Unvested outstanding shares....................... -- 305 799
---------- --------- ---------
Dilutive potential common shares.................... -- 2,286 7,228
---------- --------- ---------
Denominator of diluted earnings (loss) per
share--adjusted weighted-average shares and
assumed conversions............................... 11,663 12,643 8,635
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
Basic earnings (loss) per share..................... $ (1.55) $ 0.37 $ 0.22
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
Diluted earnings (loss) per share................... $ (1.55) $ 0.30 $ 0.04
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
For additional disclosures regarding the outstanding preferred stock, the
employee stock options, and the warrants, see Note 6--Stockholders Equity.
Options to purchase 246,462, 40,217, and 140,899 shares of common stock were
outstanding at December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively, but were not
included in the computation of diluted
F-63
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
earnings (loss) per share because the options exercise price was greater than
the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would
be antidilutive.
Additionally, potential common shares of 1,081,945, using the treasury stock
method, were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for 1997
because the Company had a loss for the period and, therefore, the effect would
be antidilutive.
CONCENTRATIONS
CREDIT RISK/CUSTOMER
The Company operates in one business segment, the development and licensing
of data warehousing software, which it sells to various companies across several
industries. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and
generally requires no collateral. A relatively small number of customers and
resellers account for a significant percentage of the Company's revenues. The
Company expects that licenses of its products to a limited number of customers
and resellers may continue to account for a high percentage of revenues for the
foreseeable future. The loss of a major customer or reseller would adversely
affect operating results. In 1997 and 1996, sales to no one customer accounted
for more than 10% of total revenues. In 1995, one customer accounted for 21% of
total revenues.
PRODUCT
Substantially all of the Company's revenues have been attributable to sales
of Red Brick Warehouse and the related maintenance and service contracts. This
product is currently expected to account for a significant part of the Company's
license revenues for the foreseeable future. As a result, a decline in demand
for, or failure to achieve broad market acceptance of, Red Brick Warehouse would
adversely affect operating results.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
In June 1997, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" ("FAS 130"). FAS 130 establishes
standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its
components in a full set of general purpose financial statements and is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company
believes that adoption of FAS 130 will not have a material impact on the
Company's consolidated financial statements.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
In June 1997, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information"
("FAS 131"). FAS 131 will change the way companies report selected segment
information in annual financial statements and also requires those companies to
report selected segment information in interim financial reports to
stockholders. FAS 131 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
1997. The Company has not yet reached a conclusion as to the appropriate
segments, if any, it will be required to report to comply with FAS 131.
F-64
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. NOTE RECEIVABLE SALE
In September 1995, the Company recognized product revenue of $1,710,000 and
recorded deferred maintenance revenue of $90,000 in connection with a license
agreement with efficient market services, inc. ("ems"), a related party. The
license agreement stated that if the Company granted a similar license for an
equivalent application to A.C. Nielsen, who was a major provider of data to ems
and a stockholder of ems, then ems could elect to terminate the agreement and
cease making future payments. The event that caused the cancellation privilege
was under the control of the Company and the Company believed that the
likelihood of cancellation was remote. As part of this transaction, the Company
recorded a long-term note receivable. In December 1995, the Company sold, on a
non-recourse basis, the remaining balance on the note receivable of $1,652,830
to Comdisco, Inc. ("Comdisco") for approximately $1,362,136 and issued a warrant
valued at $30,000 to purchase shares of the Company's common stock. The Company
recorded a loss on sale of the note receivable of $320,694, which was included
in general and administrative expenses. In addition, the Company signed a
remarketing agreement with Comdisco that provided that the Company would assist
Comdisco on a best efforts basis in the remarketing of the software under
license to ems should ems default on the note. The Company sold the note
receivable primarily to provide cash for operations.
3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1997 1996
--------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Computer equipment and software...................................... $ 5,218 $ 3,846
Furniture and equipment.............................................. 1,455 1,240
Leasehold improvements............................................... 616 567
--------- ---------
7,289 5,653
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization....................... 4,612 2,960
--------- ---------
$ 2,677 $ 2,693
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
4. PURCHASED TECHNOLOGY
On August 29, 1997, the Company executed a technology purchase agreement
with CMGI and Engage whereby the Company acquired the in-process source code and
related documentation to certain software technology. In the third quarter of
1997 the Company recorded a charge of approximately $11.0 million for in-process
technology based upon an independent appraisal. The Company paid CMGI $9.5
million in cash and issued to CMGI 238,160 shares of unregistered common stock.
The acquired in-process technology had not yet reached technological feasibility
and did not have alternative future uses.
The Company acquired in-process technology associated with a $500,000
licensing arrangement during the second quarter of 1996. At the time of
acquisition, the acquired in-process technology had not yet reached
technological feasibility and did not have alternative future uses.
F-65
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
CAPITAL AND OPERATING LEASES
The Company leases its facilities under operating leases expiring at various
dates through March 2005. In addition to base rent, the Company is responsible
for certain taxes, utilities, and maintenance costs.
The Company leases certain equipment under noncancelable lease agreements
that are accounted for as capital leases. Equipment under capital lease
arrangements, and included in property and equipment, aggregated approximately
$3,032,000 and $3,579,000 at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Related
accumulated amortization was approximately $2,627,000 and $2,338,000 at December
31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The capital leases are secured by the related
equipment, and the Company is required to maintain liability and property damage
insurance.
Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases and
capital leases are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1997
------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
CAPITAL OPERATING
LEASES LEASES
----------- -----------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
1998..................................................................... $ 429 $ 1,731
1999..................................................................... 61 1,810
2000..................................................................... -- 1,780
2001..................................................................... -- 1,736
2002..................................................................... -- 1,643
2003 and thereafter...................................................... -- 168
----- -----------
Total minimum lease payments............................................. 490 $ 8,868
-----------
-----------
Less amount representing interest........................................ 45
-----
Present value of minimum lease payments.................................. 445
Less current obligations................................................. 385
-----
Long-term obligations.................................................... $ 60
-----
-----
</TABLE>
Total rental expense for 1997, 1996, and 1995 was approximately $1,804,000
$1,005,000, and $515,000, respectively.
CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the Company may be a party to litigation and claims
incident to the ordinary course of its business. Although the results of
litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes
that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect
on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
6. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
On January 23, 1996, the Company commenced its initial public offering and
its Common Stock began trading on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol
REDB. The Company sold 2,070,000 shares in the offering and generated
approximately $33.7 million of cash net of underwriting discounts and
F-66
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
commissions and other offering costs. Upon completion of the offering, all
outstanding shares of Series A, Series B, Series C, and Series D Preferred Stock
(a total of approximately 5,863,000 shares) were converted into shares of Common
Stock on a one-for-one basis.
PREFERRED STOCK
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes 2,000,000 shares of
preferred stock. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue the preferred
stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, and
restrictions thereof, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion
rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation
preferences, and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation
of such series without further vote or action by the stockholders.
WARRANTS
In February 1993 and November 1993, the Company sold warrants to purchase
908,805 shares of Series D preferred stock at an exercise price of $2.08 per
share. In connection with the Company's initial public offering, such warrants
became warrants to purchase common stock. In 1995, warrants to purchase 340,465
shares of Series D preferred stock were exercised. Warrants to purchase 378,834
shares of the Company's common stock were exercised in connection with the
initial public offering of the Company's common stock in January 1996. At
December 31, 1997, warrants to purchase 189,506 shares of common stock were
outstanding, of which the majority expire in November 1998.
In December 1995, as part of the sale of the ems note receivable, the
Company issued a warrant to Comdisco for the purchase of the Company's common
stock and recorded additional expense of $30,000. The number of shares to be
issued under the warrant agreement is 15,556 at an exercise price of $18 per
share. At December 31, 1997, the warrant to purchase 15,556 shares of common
stock was outstanding and expires January 22, 1999.
NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM STOCKHOLDERS
During January 1994 and February 1995, certain officers of the Company were
provided cash advances totaling $194,488 for the purpose of purchasing the
Company's common stock. The underlying full recourse notes are due in January
1998 and February 1999, bear interest at 5.32% and 7.96% per annum,
respectively, and are secured by the purchased common stock. The common stock
sold in January 1994 and February 1995 vests at a rate of 25% one year after the
commencement date (January 1, 1993 and January 1, 1995, respectively) and
ratably over thirty-six months thereafter. Unvested shares may be repurchased by
the Company within 60 days of termination. As of December 31, 1997, a total of
40,570 shares of this common stock is unvested.
COMMON STOCK
At December 31, 1997, common stock was reserved for issuance as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Stock options........................................................ 3,012
Warrnts.............................................................. 205
Purchase Plan........................................................ 197
---------
3,414
---------
---------
</TABLE>
F-67
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
STOCKHOLDERS RIGHTS PLAN
On July 21, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a dividend
of one preferred share purchase right (a "Right") for each outstanding share of
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding on August 25, 1997. Each
Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one
one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par
value $0.0001 per share, of the Company, at a price of $65.00 per one
one-thousandth of a Preferred Share, subject to adjustment. The rights are not
exercisable until a person or group of affiliated or associated persons makes or
intends to make an announcement to acquire beneficial ownership of 15% or more
of the Company's outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Rights will expire on
July 20, 2007, unless extended.
7. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "1995 Plan") was adopted by the
Board of Directors on September 20, 1995, as the successor to the 1991 Stock
Option Plan (the "1991 Plan"). Under the 1995 Plan, employees (including
officers) and independent consultants may, at the discretion of the Plan
Administrator, be granted options to purchase shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price not less than 85% of the fair market value of such shares on the
grant date. Non-employee members of the Board of Directors are eligible solely
for automatic option grants under the 1995 Plan. Post-IPO options are
exercisable upon vesting. Pre-IPO options granted under the 1991 Plan are
immediately exercisable for all the option shares outstanding; however, any
unvested shares purchased under the Plan are subject to repurchase by the
Company at the original exercise price per share upon the employees cessation of
service. At December 31, 1997, a total of 91,223 shares are subject to
repurchase. Options expire ten years from the date of grant (five years in
certain instances). The options generally vest at a rate of 25% one year after
the date of grant and ratably over thirty-six months thereafter.
The Company has entered into agreements with certain officers of the Company
that provide for acceleration of vesting of certain option shares or restricted
stock as if the officer remained employed for up to an additional two years in
the event the officer's employment is involuntarily terminated following certain
acquisitions or changes in control of the Company.
At December 31, 1997, the maximum number of common shares available under
the 1995 Plan was approximately 386,000. The 1995 Plan also incorporates special
provisions (such as stock appreciation rights) which may be provided in the
future as additional employee benefits without requiring shareholder approval.
In 1995, the Company granted options to purchase 133,750 shares of common
stock at $8.00 per share outside of the 1995 Plan. In 1997, the Company granted
options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $8.13 per share and
120,000 at $7.56 per share outside of the 1995 Plan. These options vest at a
rate of 25% one year after the date of grant and ratably over thirty-six months
thereafter. At December 31, 1997, options to purchase 247,500 shares of common
stock outside of the 1995 Plan were outstanding.
SUPPLEMENTAL STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Company's Supplemental Stock Option Plan (the "Supplemental Plan") was
adopted by the Board of Directors on March 19, 1997. Under the Supplemental
Plan, employees (excluding officers) and
F-68
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (CONTINUED)
independent consultants may, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be
granted non-statutory stock options to purchase shares of common stock at an
exercise price not less than 85% of the fair market value of such shares on the
grant date. Non-employee members of the Board of Directors are not eligible for
grants under the Supplemental Plan. Options granted under the Supplemental Plan
generally vest at a rate of 25% one year after the date of grant and ratably
over thirty-six months thereafter. The Supplemental Plan will in all events
terminate on March 18, 2007. An aggregate of 600,000 shares of common stock have
been reserved for issuance under the Supplemental Plan. In 1997, the Company
granted options to purchase 521,750 shares of common stock, net of
cancellations, at a range of $6.63 to $10.06 per share that vest 100% one year
after date of grant. At December 31, 1997, options to purchase 521,750 shares of
common stock were outstanding under the Supplemental Plan.
REPRICING
In April 1997, the Company offered employees, excluding executive officers,
the option to exchange options to purchase 489,775 shares of common stock with
an aggregate exercise price of $10,782,088 for new options to purchase 489,775
shares with an exercise price of $6.00 per share and an aggregate exercise price
of $4,193,475. All options that were repriced began vesting six months after the
vesting start date under the original terms of the option grant.
In July 1996, the Company offered employees, excluding executive officers,
the option to exchange options to purchase 164,450 shares of common stock with
an aggregate exercise price of $7,093,288 for new options to purchase 164,450
shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $25.50 per share and an
aggregate exercise price of $2,938,650. All options that were repriced generally
began vesting three months after the vesting start date under the original terms
of the option grant.
A summary of the Company's stock option activity, and related information
for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
OPTIONS EXERCISE OPTIONS EXERCISE OPTIONS EXERCISE
(000) PRICE (000) PRICE (000) PRICE
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Outstanding--beginning of year.................... 1,875 $ 8.50 1,696 $ 2.94 1,766 $ 0.22
Options granted................................... 2,225 $ 8.02 728 $ 27.94 1,307 $ 3.83
Options exercised................................. (465) $ 1.17 (224) $ 1.09 (1,237) $ 0.26
Options canceled.................................. (1,009) $ 15.35 (325) $ 28.14 (140) $ 0.59
----------- ----- -----------
Outstanding--end of year.......................... 2,626 $ 6.75 1,875 $ 8.50 1,696 $ 2.94
----------- ----- -----------
----------- ----- -----------
Exercisable at end of year........................ 815
-----------
-----------
</TABLE>
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
In 1995, the Board of Directors and stockholders approved an Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"). The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify
under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and is administered over offering
periods of 24 months each, with purchases occurring at six-month intervals.
Under the Purchase Plan, eligible employees are entitled to purchase shares at
85% of the lower of fair market value of the common stock at the beginning of
the 24-month offering period or on the
F-69
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (CONTINUED)
applicable semi-annual purchase date. Under the Purchase Plan, 196,640 shares of
common stock are reserved for issuance under the plan at December 31, 1997.
Under the Purchase Plan, 213,636, 89,724, and no shares were issued in 1997,
1996, and 1995, respectively. The weighted average fair values of shares granted
under the Purchase Plan during 1997 and 1996 were $5.87 and $7.59, respectively.
ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) per share is required by
FAS 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its
employee stock-based awards granted subsequent to December 31, 1994, under the
fair value method of that Statement. The fair value for these awards was
estimated at the date of grant using the minimum value method prior to the
Company's initial filing with the SEC in connection with the IPO and,
subsequently to the IPO, the Black-Scholes options pricing model. The
Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because
the Company's stock-based awards have characteristics significantly different
from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input
assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of its stock-based awards.
The weighted average fair value of options granted in 1997 and 1996 was
$4.82 and $15.13, respectively. The weighted average fair value of purchase
rights granted under the Purchase Plan in 1997 and 1996 was $5.87 and $7.59,
respectively. The fair value of the Company's stock-based awards to employees
was estimated using no expected dividends and the following weighted-average
assumptions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PURCHASE
OPTIONS PLAN
--------------------------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
JAN. 1- SEPT. 27-
SEPT. 26, DEC. 31,
1997 1996 1995 1995 1997 1996
---- ---- --------- --------- ---- ----
Expected life (years)................... 5 5 5 5 0.50 0.50
Expected volatility..................... 0.65 0.55 0.00 0.55 1.04 0.79
Risk-Free Interest Rate................. 6.19% 6.18% 5.69% 5.69% 6.03% 5.08%
</TABLE>
If compensation cost for the employee stock-based awards was determined
based on the fair value at the grant date for awards in 1997, 1996 and 1995,
consistent with the provisions of FAS 123, the Company's net income (loss) and
net income (loss) per share for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997, 1996
and 1995 would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE
DATA)
Pro forma net income (loss)......................................................... $ (24,155) $ 1,268 $ 199
Pro forma earnings (loss) per share:
Basic............................................................................. $ (2.07) $ 0.13 $ 0.14
Diluted........................................................................... $ (2.07) $ 0.10 $ 0.02
</TABLE>
F-70
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (CONTINUED)
Because FAS 123 is applicable only to options granted subsequent to December
31, 1994, its pro forma effects will not be fully reflected until the year 2000.
In addition the effects of applying FAS 123 for providing pro forma disclosures
are not likely to be representative of the effects on reported net income (loss)
for future years.
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 1997, and
weighted-average remaining contractual life is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
----------------------------------------------- OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
WEIGHTED ------------------------------
NUMBER AVERAGE WEIGHTED NUMBER WEIGHTED
RANGE OF OUTSTANDING REMAINING AVERAGE EXERCISABLE AVERAGE
EXERCISE AT 12/31/97 CONTRACTUAL LIFE EXERCISE AT 12/31/97 EXERCISE
PRICES (000) (YEARS) PRICE (000) PRICE
- ----------------------- ------------- ----------------- ------------- --------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0.16 - $ 0.32 262 6.54 $ 0.21 262 $ 0.21
$ 0.80 - $ 1.20 64 6.35 $ 0.89 64 $ 0.89
$ 1.92 - $ 2.80 24 7.44 $ 2.24 24 $ 2.24
$ 4.80 - $ 7.20 1,270 9.14 $ 6.27 313 $ 5.93
$ 7.25 - $10.06 926 9.61 $ 8.68 87 $ 8.03
$18.00 - $25.25 80 8.48 $ 19.55 65 $ 19.73
----- ----- ------ --- ------
$ 0.16 - $25.25 2,626 8.77 $ 6.75 815 $ 4.91
----- ----- ------ --- ------
----- ----- ------ --- ------
</TABLE>
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
In October 1991, the Company adopted a plan to provide retirement and
incidental benefits for its employees, known as the Red Brick Systems 401(k)
Retirement Savings Plan. As allowed under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code, the plan provides tax-deferred salary deductions for eligible employees.
Employees are eligible to participate after a sixty day service requirement.
Participants may make salary deferral contributions to the plan of up to 20% of
their compensation. The plan permits for company contributions; however, none
have been made as of December 31, 1997.
9. INCOME TAXES
The components of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes consist of
the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal.......................................................... $ -- $ 75 $ 98
State............................................................ -- 86 28
Foreign.......................................................... 203 152 17
--------- --------- ---------
Total current.................................................. 203 313 143
--------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
F-71
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Deferred:
Federal.......................................................... 900 (900) --
State............................................................ 100 (100) --
Foreign.......................................................... -- -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Total deferred................................................. 1,000 (1,000) --
--------- --------- ---------
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes.................... $ 1,203 $ (687) $ 143
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
The difference between the provision for (benefit from) income taxes and the
amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate of 34% to
income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes is explained
below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income tax (benefit) computed at the federal statutory rate..... $ (5,763) $ 1,036 $ 153
State taxes..................................................... -- 86 28
Foreign taxes................................................... 203 152 --
Losses for which no tax benefit was recognized.................. 1,981 -- --
Tax benefits of net operating loss carryforwards................ -- (1,015) (773)
Adjustment of the valuation allowance........................... 1,000 (1,000) 717
In-process research & development............................... 3,734 -- --
Other........................................................... 48 54 18
--------- --------- ---------
Provision (benefit) for income taxes........................ $ 1,203 $ (687) $ 143
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
The 1997 income tax provision of $1,203,000 includes approximately $203,000
in current income taxes, consisting principally of foreign withholding taxes and
other foreign income taxes, and a $1,000,000 deferred tax provision to establish
a valuation allowance with respect to the net deferred tax assets. The 1996
income tax benefit reflected the original recognition of the $1,000,000 in
deferred tax assets. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against
its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 1997 due to uncertainties
surrounding their realization.
F-72
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of
the Company's deferred tax assets are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1997 1996
---------- ---------
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards...................................... $ 4,358 $ 2,092
Tax credit carryforwards.............................................. 1,217 618
Reserves and accruals................................................. 1,056 703
Intangible assets..................................................... 4,233 --
Other................................................................. 461 196
---------- ---------
Total deferred tax assets............................................... 11,325 3,609
Valuation allowance..................................................... (11,325) (2,609)
---------- ---------
Net deferred tax assets................................................. $ -- $ 1,000
---------- ---------
---------- ---------
</TABLE>
The valuation allowance increased by $8,716,000 during 1997 and decreased by
$1,583,000 during 1996. Approximately $1,052,000 of the valuation allowance at
December 31, 1997, is attributable to the tax benefits of disqualifying
dispositions of stock received through incentive stock options and the Company's
employee stock purchase plan, the benefit of which will be credited to
additional paid in capital when realized.
At December 31, 1997, the Company has federal and state net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $12,000,000 and $5,500,000, respectively, and
federal and state tax credit carryforwards of approximately $650,000 and
$450,000, respectively. These carryforwards will expire beginning in the years
1999 through 2012. Utilization of approximately $1,500,000 of the net operating
loss carryforwards is limited to approximately $100,000 per year due to the
ownership change provisions provided by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and similar
state provisions.
10. RELATED PARTY REVENUES
During 1995, the Company recorded revenue of approximately $1,720,000 for
sales to ems. ems is a related party of the Company due to the fact that venture
capital funds affiliated with Asset Management Associates 1989, L.P. and Menlo
Ventures IV, L.P., two principal stockholders of the Company at the time of the
transactions, were also principal stockholders of ems. Gross margins realized on
related party transactions have not been materially different from the gross
margins realized on similar types of transactions with unaffiliated customers.
11. EXPORT REVENUES
The Company markets its products in the United States and foreign countries
through its sales personnel, value added resellers, and subsidiaries. Sales
between geographic areas are accounted for at prices that provide a profit and
are in accordance with the rules and regulations of the respective governing
F-73
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. EXPORT REVENUES (CONTINUED)
authorities. Total export revenues by geographic region for the three years
ended December 31, 1997 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
Asia Pacific..................................................... $ 3,732 $ 901 $ 596
Europe........................................................... 1,202 1,253 --
Other............................................................ 2,438 1,504 1,084
--------- --------- ---------
$ 7,372 $ 3,658 $ 1,680
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
On March 25, 1998, two purported class action lawsuits were filed in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California by or on
behalf of persons who purchased the Company's Common Stock between January 15,
1997 and April 15, 1997. These actions name as defendants, among others, the
Company and certain of its present and former officers and directors. The
complaints allege various violations of the federal securities laws and seek
unspecified monetary damages. The Company believes both complaints are without
merit and will vigorously defend itself against both complaints.
The Company has experienced a reduction in license revenues, continued
losses from operations and substantial cash used in operating activities. The
Company's future success depends on its ability to enhance its current products,
to develop and introduce new products that keep pace with technological
developments and emerging industry standards on a timely basis and to
successfully market and license such products. The Company believes that its
current cash and investment balances are sufficient to meet anticipated working
capital and capital expenditure requirements through at least December 31, 1998.
Thereafter, the Company's ability to meet its goals above will depend upon the
ability of management to raise additional capital to fund operations, increase
revenues by introducing new products and increasing marketing efforts, and
reduce spending. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
raise additional capital, increase revenues or reduce spending. The Company's
inability to raise additional capital, increase revenues or reduce spending
would have a material adverse affect on the Company's financial condition and
results of operations.
F-74
<PAGE>
ANNEX A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION
BY AND AMONG
INFORMIX CORPORATION,
IC MERGER CORPORATION
AND
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
Dated as of October 7, 1998
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<C> <C> <S> <C>
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER ....................................................... A-1
1.1 The Merger ................................................. A-1
1.2 Effective Time; Closing .................................... A-1
1.3 Effect of the Merger ....................................... A-2
1.4 Certificate of Incorporation; Bylaws ....................... A-2
1.5 Directors and Officers ..................................... A-2
1.6 Effect on Capital Stock .................................... A-2
1.7 Surrender of Certificates .................................. A-3
1.8 No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common Stock ........ A-4
1.9 Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Certificates ..................... A-4
1.10 Tax and Accounting Consequences ............................ A-5
1.11 Taking of Necessary Action; Further Action ................. A-5
ARTICLE II
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF COMPANY ........................ A-5
2.1 Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries ............... A-5
2.2 Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws .................... A-5
2.3 Capitalization ............................................. A-5
2.4 Authority Relative to this Agreement ....................... A-6
2.5 No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents ................. A-6
2.6 Compliance; Permits ........................................ A-7
2.7 SEC Filings; Financial Statements .......................... A-8
2.8 No Undisclosed Liabilities ................................. A-8
2.9 Absence of Certain Changes or Events ....................... A-8
2.10 Absence of Litigation ...................................... A-9
2.11 Employee Benefit Plans ..................................... A-9
2.12 Labor Matters .............................................. A-11
2.13 Registration Statement; Proxy Statement .................... A-11
2.14 Restrictions on Business Activities ........................ A-11
2.15 Title to Property .......................................... A-11
2.16 Taxes ...................................................... A-11
2.17 Environmental Matters ...................................... A-12
2.18 Brokers .................................................... A-12
2.19 Intellectual Property ...................................... A-12
2.20 Agreements, Contracts and Commitments ...................... A-14
2.21 Company Rights Plan ........................................ A-15
2.22 Insurance .................................................. A-15
2.23 Opinion of Financial Advisor ............................... A-16
2.24 Board Approval ............................................. A-16
2.25 Vote Required .............................................. A-16
2.26 State Takeover Statutes .................................... A-16
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB . A-16
3.1 Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries ............... A-16
3.2 Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws .................... A-17
3.3 Capitalization ............................................. A-17
3.4 Authority Relative to this Agreement ....................... A-17
3.5 No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents ................. A-17
3.6 SEC Filings; Financial Statements .......................... A-18
</TABLE>
A-i
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<C> <C> <S> <C>
3.7 Absence of Certain Changes or Events ....................... A-19
3.8 Absence of Litigation ...................................... A-19
3.9 Registration Statement; Proxy Statement .................... A-19
3.10 Board Approval ............................................. A-19
3.11 Interim Operations of Merger Sub ........................... A-19
3.12 Parent Ownership of Company Common Stock ................... A-19
ARTICLE IV
CONDUCT PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME .............................. A-19
4.1 Conduct of Business by Company ............................. A-19
4.2 Conduct of Business by Parent .............................. A-21
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS ............................................ A-22
5.1 Proxy Statement/Prospectus; Registration Statement; Other
Filings; Board Recommendations ........................... A-22
5.2 Meeting of Company Stockholders ............................ A-22
5.3 Confidentiality; Access to Information ..................... A-23
5.4 No Solicitation ............................................ A-24
5.5 Public Disclosure .......................................... A-25
5.6 Reasonable Efforts; Notification ........................... A-25
5.7 Third Party Consents ....................................... A-26
5.8 Stock Options and Employee Benefits ........................ A-26
5.9 Form S-8 ................................................... A-27
5.10 Indemnification ............................................ A-27
5.11 Nasdaq Listing ............................................. A-28
5.12 Company Affiliate Agreement ................................ A-28
5.13 Regulatory Filings; Reasonable Efforts ..................... A-28
5.14 Comfort Letter ............................................. A-28
5.15 Company Audit .............................................. A-28
5.16 No Rights Plan Amendment ................................... A-29
5.17 Noncompetition Agreements .................................. A-29
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER ......................................... A-29
6.1 Conditions to Obligations of Each Party to Effect the
Merger ................................................... A-29
6.2 Additional Conditions to Obligations of Company ............ A-30
6.3 Additional Conditions to the Obligations of Parent and
Merger Sub ............................................... A-30
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER ................................ A-31
7.1 Termination ................................................ A-31
7.2 Notice of Termination; Effect of Termination ............... A-32
7.3 Fees and Expenses .......................................... A-32
7.4 Amendment .................................................. A-33
7.5 Extension; Waiver .......................................... A-33
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................... A-33
8.1 Non-Survival of Representations and Warranties ............. A-33
8.2 Notices .................................................... A-33
8.3 Interpretation; Knowledge .................................. A-34
8.4 Counterparts ............................................... A-34
8.5 Entire Agreement; Third Party Beneficiaries ................ A-34
</TABLE>
A-ii
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<C> <C> <S> <C>
8.6 Severability ............................................... A-35
8.7 Other Remedies; Specific Performance ....................... A-35
8.8 Governing Law .............................................. A-35
8.9 Rules of Construction ...................................... A-35
8.10 Assignment ................................................. A-35
8.11 Waiver of Jury Trial ....................................... A-35
</TABLE>
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Exhibit A Form of Voting Agreement
Exhibit B Form of Stock Option Agreement
Exhibit C Form of Affiliate Agreement
Exhibit D-1 Persons to Sign Noncompetition Agreement
Exhibit D-2 Form of Noncompetition Agreement
</TABLE>
A-iii
<PAGE>
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION
This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION is made and entered into as of
October 7, 1998, among Informix Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Parent"),
IC Merger Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Red Brick Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Company").
RECITALS
A. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement (as
defined in Section 1.2 below) and in accordance with the Delaware General
Corporation Law ("Delaware Law"), Parent and Company intend to enter into a
business combination transaction.
B. The Board of Directors of Company (i) has determined that the Merger (as
defined in Section 1.1) is consistent with and in furtherance of the long-term
business strategy of Company and fair to, and in the best interests of, Company
and its stockholders, (ii) has approved this Agreement, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (iii) has determined to
recommend that the stockholders of Company adopt and approve this Agreement and
approve the Merger.
C. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, and as a condition
and inducement to Parent's willingness to enter into this Agreement, certain
affiliates of Company are entering into Voting Agreements in substantially the
form attached hereto as EXHIBIT A (the "Company Voting Agreements").
D. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, and as a condition
and inducement to Parent's willingness to enter into this Agreement, Company
shall execute and deliver a Stock Option Agreement in favor of Parent in
substantially the form attached hereto as EXHIBIT B (the "Company Stock Option
Agreement"). The Board of Directors of Company has approved the Company Stock
Option Agreement.
E. The parties intend, by executing this Agreement, to adopt a plan of
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code").
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, promises and
representations set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree
as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER
1.1 THE MERGER. At the Effective Time (as defined in Section 1.2) and
subject to and upon the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the
applicable provisions of Delaware Law, Merger Sub shall be merged with and into
Company (the "Merger"), the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall
cease and Company shall continue as the surviving corporation. Company as the
surviving corporation after the Merger is hereinafter sometimes referred to as
the "Surviving Corporation."
1.2 EFFECTIVE TIME; CLOSING. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement,
the parties hereto shall cause the Merger to be consummated by filing a
Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in
accordance with the relevant provisions of Delaware Law (the "Certificate of
Merger") (the time of such filing (or such later time as may be agreed in
writing by Company and Parent and specified in the Certificate of Merger) being
the "Effective Time") as soon as practicable on or after the Closing Date (as
herein defined). Unless the context otherwise requires, the term "Agreement" as
used herein refers collectively to this Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and
the Certificate of Merger. The closing of the Merger (the "Closing") shall take
place at the offices of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional
Corporation, at a time and date to be specified by the parties, which shall be
no later than the
A-1
<PAGE>
second business day after the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth
in Article VI, or at such other time, date and location as the parties hereto
agree in writing (the "Closing Date").
1.3 EFFECT OF THE MERGER. At the Effective Time, the effect of the Merger
shall be as provided in this Agreement and the applicable provisions of Delaware
Law. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, and subject thereto, at
the Effective Time all the property, rights, privileges, powers and franchises
of Company and Merger Sub shall vest in the Surviving Corporation, and all
debts, liabilities and duties of Company and Merger Sub shall become the debts,
liabilities and duties of the Surviving Corporation.
1.4 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION; BYLAWS.
(a) At the Effective Time, the Certificate of Incorporation of Merger Sub,
as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall be the Certificate
of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until thereafter amended as
provided by law and such Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving
Corporation; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that at the Effective Time the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation shall be amended so that the name of
the Surviving Corporation shall be "Red Brick Systems, Inc."
(b) The Bylaws of Merger Sub, as in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time, shall be, at the Effective Time, the Bylaws of the Surviving
Corporation until thereafter amended.
1.5 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. The initial directors of the Surviving
Corporation shall be the directors of Merger Sub immediately prior to the
Effective Time, until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed
and qualified. The initial officers of the Surviving Corporation shall be the
officers of Merger Sub immediately prior to the Effective Time, until their
respective successors are duly appointed.
1.6 EFFECT ON CAPITAL STOCK. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the
Merger and without any action on the part of Merger Sub, Company or the holders
of any of the following securities:
(a) CONVERSION OF COMPANY COMMON STOCK. Each share of Common Stock,
$0.0001 par value per share, of Company (the "Company Common Stock") (including,
with respect to each such share of Company Common Stock, the associated Rights
(as defined in that certain Rights Agreement (the "Company Rights Plan") dated
as of July 21, 1997 between the Company and Harris Trust and Savings Bank as
Rights Agent) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time,
other than any shares of Company Common Stock to be canceled pursuant to Section
1.6(b), will be canceled and extinguished and automatically converted (subject
to Sections 1.6(e) and (f)) into the right to receive 0.600 (the "Exchange
Ratio") shares of Common Stock of Parent (the "Parent Common Stock") upon
surrender of the certificate representing such share of Company Common Stock in
the manner provided in Section 1.7 (or in the case of a lost, stolen or
destroyed certificate, upon delivery of an affidavit (and bond, if required) in
the manner provided in Section 1.9).
(b) CANCELLATION OF PARENT-OWNED STOCK. Each share of Company Common Stock
held by Company or owned by Merger Sub, Parent or any direct or indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Company or of Parent immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be canceled and extinguished without any conversion
thereof.
(c) STOCK OPTIONS; EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLANS. At the Effective Time,
all options to purchase Company Common Stock then outstanding under Company's
1995 Stock Option Plan (including options granted under the predecessor 1991
Stock Option Plan) and the Company's Supplemental Stock Option Plan
(collectively, the "Company Stock Option Plans"), as well as those options
described in Section 2.3 (viii) hereof, shall be assumed by Parent in accordance
with Section 5.8 hereof. Rights outstanding under Company's 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the "ESPP") shall be treated as set forth in Section 5.8.
(d) WARRANTS. At the Effective Time, (i) those certain warrants to
purchase Common Stock of the Company, under which 69,416 shares remain
exercisable (the "Common Warrants") and (ii) that certain warrant issued to
Comdisco, Inc. for the purchase of 15,555 shares of Company Common Stock (the
A-2
<PAGE>
"Comdisco Warrant") shall be assumed by Parent in accordance with the terms
thereof. In this regard, the Company agrees to provide the holders of the Common
Warrants and the Comdisco Warrants (collectively the "Company Warrants") with
any and all notices required as a result of the Merger and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
(e) CAPITAL STOCK OF MERGER SUB. Each share of Common Stock, $0.001 par
value per share, of Merger Sub (the "Merger Sub Common Stock") issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into one
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of Common Stock, $0.0001 par
value per share, of the Surviving Corporation. Each certificate evidencing
ownership of shares of Merger Sub Common Stock shall evidence ownership of such
shares of capital stock of the Surviving Corporation.
(f) ADJUSTMENTS TO EXCHANGE RATIO. The Exchange Ratio shall be adjusted to
reflect appropriately the effect of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock
dividend (including any dividend or distribution of securities convertible into
Parent Common Stock or Company Common Stock), reorganization, recapitalization,
reclassification or other like change with respect to Parent Common Stock or
Company Common Stock occurring on or after the date hereof and prior to the
Effective Time.
(g) FRACTIONAL SHARES. No fraction of a share of Parent Common Stock will
be issued by virtue of the Merger, but in lieu thereof each holder of shares of
Company Common Stock who would otherwise be entitled to a fraction of a share of
Parent Common Stock (after aggregating all fractional shares of Parent Common
Stock that otherwise would be received by such holder) shall receive from Parent
an amount of cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) equal to the product of
(i) such fraction, multiplied by (ii) the average closing price of one share of
Parent Common Stock for the five (5) most recent days that Parent Common Stock
has traded ending on the trading day immediately prior to the Effective Time, as
reported on the Nasdaq National Market System ("Nasdaq").
1.7 SURRENDER OF CERTIFICATES.
(a) EXCHANGE AGENT. Parent shall select a bank or trust company reasonably
acceptable to Company to act as the exchange agent (the "Exchange Agent") in the
Merger.
(b) PARENT TO PROVIDE COMMON STOCK. Promptly after the Effective Time (but
in no event later than three (3) business days thereafter), Parent shall make
available to the Exchange Agent for exchange in accordance with this Article I,
the shares of Parent Common Stock issuable pursuant to Section 1.6 in exchange
for outstanding shares of Company Common Stock, and cash in an amount sufficient
for payment in lieu of fractional shares pursuant to Section 1.6(g) and any
dividends or distributions to which holders of shares of Company Common Stock
may be entitled pursuant to Section 1.7(d).
(c) EXCHANGE PROCEDURES. Promptly after the Effective Time (but in no
event later than five (5) business days thereafter), Parent shall cause the
Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of record (as of the Effective Time) of a
certificate or certificates (the "Certificates"), which immediately prior to the
Effective Time represented outstanding shares of Company Common Stock whose
shares were converted into shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to Section
1.6, cash in lieu of any fractional shares pursuant to Section 1.6(g) and any
dividends or other distributions pursuant to Section 1.7(d), (i) a letter of
transmittal in customary form (which shall specify that delivery shall be
effected, and risk of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon
delivery of the Certificates to the Exchange Agent and shall contain such other
provisions as Parent may reasonably specify) and (ii) instructions for use in
effecting the surrender of the Certificates in exchange for certificates
representing shares of Parent Common Stock, cash in lieu of any fractional
shares pursuant to Section 1.6(g) and any dividends or other distributions
pursuant to Section 1.7(d). Upon surrender of Certificates for cancellation to
the Exchange Agent or to such other agent or agents as may be appointed by
Parent, together with such letter of transmittal, duly completed and validly
executed in accordance with the instructions thereto, the holders of such
Certificates shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor certificates
representing the number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock into which their
shares of Company Common Stock were converted at the Effective
A-3
<PAGE>
Time, payment in lieu of fractional shares which such holders have the right to
receive pursuant to Section 1.6(g) and any dividends or distributions payable
pursuant to Section 1.7(d), and the Certificates so surrendered shall forthwith
be canceled. Until so surrendered, outstanding Certificates will be deemed from
and after the Effective Time, for all corporate purposes, subject to Section
1.7(d) as to the payment of dividends, to evidence only the ownership of the
number of full shares of Parent Common Stock into which such shares of Company
Common Stock shall have been so converted and the right to receive an amount in
cash in lieu of the issuance of any fractional shares in accordance with Section
1.6(g) and any dividends or distributions payable pursuant to Section 1.7(d).
(d) DISTRIBUTIONS WITH RESPECT TO UNEXCHANGED SHARES. No dividends or
other distributions declared or made after the date of this Agreement with
respect to Parent Common Stock with a record date after the Effective Time will
be paid to the holders of any unsurrendered Certificates with respect to the
shares of Parent Common Stock represented thereby until the holders of record of
such Certificates shall surrender such Certificates. Subject to applicable law,
following surrender of any such Certificates, the Exchange Agent shall deliver
to the record holders thereof, without interest, certificates representing whole
shares of Parent Common Stock issued in exchange therefor along with payment in
lieu of fractional shares pursuant to Section 1.6(g) hereof and the amount of
any such dividends or other distributions with a record date after the Effective
Time payable with respect to such whole shares of Parent Common Stock.
(e) TRANSFERS OF OWNERSHIP. If certificates representing shares of Parent
Common Stock are to be issued in a name other than that in which the
Certificates surrendered in exchange therefor are registered, it will be a
condition of the issuance thereof that the Certificates so surrendered will be
properly endorsed and otherwise in proper form for transfer and that the persons
requesting such exchange will have paid to Parent or any agent designated by it
any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the issuance of certificates
representing shares of Parent Common Stock in any name other than that of the
registered holder of the Certificates surrendered, or established to the
satisfaction of Parent or any agent designated by it that such tax has been paid
or is not payable.
(f) NO LIABILITY. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section
1.7, neither the Exchange Agent, Parent, the Surviving Corporation nor any party
hereto shall be liable to a holder of shares of Parent Common Stock or Company
Common Stock for any amount properly paid to a public official pursuant to any
applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar law.
1.8 NO FURTHER OWNERSHIP RIGHTS IN COMPANY COMMON STOCK. All shares of
Parent Common Stock issued in accordance with the terms hereof (including any
cash paid in respect thereof pursuant to Section 1.6(g) and 1.7(d)) shall be
deemed to have been issued in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such
shares of Company Common Stock, and there shall be no further registration of
transfers on the records of the Surviving Corporation of shares of Company
Common Stock which were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If
after the Effective Time Certificates are presented to the Surviving Corporation
for any reason, they shall be canceled and exchanged as provided in this Article
I.
1.9 LOST, STOLEN OR DESTROYED CERTIFICATES. In the event that any
Certificates shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, the Exchange Agent shall
issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificates, upon the
making of an affidavit of that fact by the holder thereof, certificates
representing the shares of Parent Common Stock into which the shares of Company
Common Stock represented by such Certificates were converted pursuant to Section
1.6, cash for fractional shares, if any, as may be required pursuant to Section
1.6(g) and any dividends or distributions payable pursuant to Section 1.7(d);
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that Parent may, in its discretion and as a condition
precedent to the issuance of such certificates representing shares of Parent
Common Stock, cash and other distributions, require the owner of such lost,
stolen or destroyed Certificates to deliver a bond in such sum as it may
reasonably direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against
Parent, the Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent with respect to the
Certificates alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed.
A-4
<PAGE>
1.10 TAX AND ACCOUNTING CONSEQUENCES.
(a) It is intended by the parties hereto that the Merger shall constitute a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Code. The parties hereto
adopt this Agreement as a "plan of reorganization" within the meaning of
Sections 1.368-2(g) and 1.368-3(a) of the United States Income Tax Regulations.
(b) It is intended by the parties hereto that the Merger shall be treated as
a purchase for accounting purposes.
1.11 TAKING OF NECESSARY ACTION; FURTHER ACTION. If, at any time after the
Effective Time, any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the
purposes of this Agreement and to vest the Surviving Corporation with full
right, title and possession to all assets, property, rights, privileges, powers
and franchises of Company and Merger Sub, the officers and directors of Company
and Merger Sub will take all such lawful and necessary action. Parent shall
cause Merger Sub to perform all of its obligations relating to this Agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby.
ARTICLE II
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF COMPANY
Company represents and warrants to Parent and Merger Sub, subject to such
exceptions as are set forth in the Company SEC Reports (as defined in Section
2.7.1 or specifically disclosed in the disclosure letter (referencing the
appropriate section and paragraph numbers) delivered by Company to Parent on or
prior to the date of this Agreement (the "Company Disclosure Letter"), as
follows:
2.1 ORGANIZATION AND QUALIFICATION; SUBSIDIARIES. Each of Company and its
subsidiaries is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation and has the
requisite corporate power and authority to own, lease and operate its assets and
properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. Each of
Company and its subsidiaries is in possession of all franchises, grants,
authorizations, licenses, permits, easements, consents, certificates, approvals
and orders ("Approvals") necessary to own, lease and operate the properties it
purports to own, operate or lease and to carry on its business as it is now
being conducted, except where the failure to have such Approvals would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in
Section 8.3(c)) on the Company. Each of Company and its subsidiaries is duly
qualified or licensed as a foreign corporation to do business, and is in good
standing, in each jurisdiction where the character of the properties owned,
leased or operated by it or the nature of its activities makes such
qualification or licensing necessary, except for such failures to be so duly
qualified or licensed and in good standing that would not, either individually
or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Other than
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Company does not directly or indirectly own any
equity or similar interest in, or any interest convertible or exchangeable or
exercisable for, any equity or similar interest in, any corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other business, association or entity.
2.2 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS. Company has previously
furnished to Parent a complete and correct copy of its Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws as amended to date. Such Certificate of Incorporation,
Bylaws and equivalent organizational documents of each of its subsidiaries are
in full force and effect. Neither Company nor any of its subsidiaries is in
violation of any of the provisions of its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws
or equivalent organizational documents.
2.3 CAPITALIZATION. The authorized capital stock of Company consists of
50,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock and 2,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock ("Company Preferred Stock"), each having a par value of $0.0001 per share.
At the close of business on September 30, 1998, (i) 12,558,738 shares of Company
Common Stock were issued and outstanding all of which are validly issued, fully
paid and nonassessable, (ii) no shares of Company Common Stock were held in
treasury by Company or by subsidiaries of Company, (iii) 1,500,000 shares of
Company Common Stock were available for future
A-5
<PAGE>
issuance pursuant to Company's employee stock purchase plan, (iv) 2,645,800
shares of Company Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of
outstanding options to purchase Company Common Stock under the 1995 Option Plan,
(v) 28,359 shares of Company Common Stock were available for future grant under
the 1995 Option Plan, (vi) 1,856,050 shares of Company Common Stock were
reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding options to purchase Company
Common Stock under the Supplemental Stock Option Plan, (vii) 191,512 shares of
Company Common Stock were available for future grant under the Supplemental
Stock Option Plan; (viii) 27,500 shares of Company Common Stock were reserved
for issuance upon exercise of options to purchase Company Common Stock not made
under the 1995 Stock Option Plan or the Supplemental Stock Option Plan, (ix)
205,163 shares of Company Common Stock were reserved for future issuance upon
conversion of Company Warrants (as described in Section 1.6(d)) and (x) a
sufficient number of shares of Company Common Stock were reserved for future
issuance pursuant to the Company Option Agreement. As of the date hereof, no
shares of Company Preferred Stock were issued or outstanding and 30,000 shares
of Company Series A Preferred were reserved for issuance upon exercise of the
Company Rights. No change in such capitalization has occurred between September
30, 1998 and the date hereof except (x) the issuance of shares of Company Common
Stock pursuant to the exercise of outstanding options or warrants or (y) the
cancellation of unvested options for Common Stock held by, or the repurchase of
unvested shares of Common Stock from, directors employees, consultants or other
service providers of the Company pursuant to the terms of their stock option,
stock purchase or stock restriction agreements. Except as set forth in this
Section 2.3, as of the date of this Agreement, there are no options, warrants or
other rights, agreements, arrangements or commitments of any character relating
to the issued or unissued capital stock of Company or any of its subsidiaries or
obligating Company or any of its subsidiaries to issue or sell any shares of
capital stock of, or other equity interests in, Company or any of its
subsidiaries. All shares of Company Common Stock subject to issuance as
aforesaid, upon issuance on the terms and conditions specified in the
instruments pursuant to which they are issuable, shall be duly authorized,
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. There are no obligations,
contingent or otherwise, of Company or any of its subsidiaries to repurchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of Company Common Stock or the capital
stock of any subsidiary or to provide funds to or make any investment (in the
form of a loan, capital contribution or otherwise) in any such subsidiary or any
other entity other than guarantees of obligations of subsidiaries entered into
in the ordinary course of business. All of the outstanding shares of capital
stock of each of Company's subsidiaries are duly authorized, validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable and all such shares are owned by Company or another
subsidiary free and clear of all security interests, liens, claims, pledges,
agreements, limitations in Company's voting rights, charges or other
encumbrances of any nature whatsoever.
2.4 AUTHORITY RELATIVE TO THIS AGREEMENT. Company has all necessary
corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and the
Company Option Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder and thereunder
and, subject to obtaining the approval of the stockholders of Company of the
Merger, to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby. The
execution and delivery of this Agreement and the Company Option Agreement by
Company and the consummation by Company of the transactions contemplated hereby
and thereby have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate
action on the part of Company and no other corporate proceedings on the part of
Company are necessary to authorize this Agreement, the Company Option Agreement
or to consummate the transactions so contemplated (other than, with respect to
the Merger, the approval and adoption of this Agreement by holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock in accordance with the
Delaware General Corporation Law and Company's Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws). This Agreement and the Company Option Agreement have been duly and
validly executed and delivered by Company and, assuming the due authorization,
execution and delivery by Parent and Merger Sub, constitute legal and binding
obligations of Company, enforceable against Company in accordance with their
respective terms.
2.5 NO CONFLICT; REQUIRED FILINGS AND CONSENTS.
A-6
<PAGE>
2.5.1 The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the Company Option
Agreement by Company do not, and the performance of this Agreement and the
Company Option Agreement by Company shall not, (i) conflict with or violate the
Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws or equivalent organizational documents of
Company or any of its subsidiaries, (ii) subject to obtaining the approval of
Company's stockholders of the Merger and compliance with the requirements set
forth in Section 2.5.2 below, conflict with or violate any law, rule,
regulation, order, judgment or decree applicable to Company or any of its
subsidiaries or by which its or any of their respective properties is bound or
affected, or (iii) result in any breach of or constitute a default (or an event
that with notice or lapse of time or both would become a default) under, or
impair Company's rights or alter the rights or obligations of any third party
under, or give to others any rights of termination, amendment, acceleration or
cancellation of, or result in the creation of a lien or encumbrance on any of
the properties or assets of Company or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to, any
material note, bond, mortgage, indenture, contract, agreement, lease, license,
permit, franchise or other instrument or obligation to which Company or any of
its subsidiaries is a party or by which Company or any of its subsidiaries or
its or any of their respective properties are bound or affected (except, in the
case of end-user license agreements not relating to the Company's fifty largest
accounts measured in terms of revenue generated during the two-year period prior
to the date hereof (but not with respect to any other agreements, end-user or
otherwise), where such breach, default, impairment of rights, alteration of
rights or obligations, right of termination, amendment, acceleration or
cancellation, or creation of a lien or encumbrance (i) would not prevent
consummation of the Merger or otherwise prevent Company from performing its
obligations under this Agreement or (ii) could not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company).
2.5.2 The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the Company Option
Agreement by Company do not, and the performance of this Agreement by Company
shall not, require any consent, approval, authorization or permit of, or filing
with or notification to, any court, administrative agency, commission,
governmental or regulatory authority, domestic or foreign (a "Governmental
Entity"), except (A) for applicable requirements, if any, of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act"), state securities laws ("Blue Sky Laws"), the
pre-merger notification requirements (the "HSR Approval") of the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act")
and of foreign Governmental Entities and the rules and regulations thereunder,
the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and the filing and
recordation of the Certificate of Merger as required by the Delaware General
Corporation Law and (B) where the failure to obtain such consents, approvals,
authorizations or permits, or to make such filings or notifications, (i) would
not prevent consummation of the Merger or otherwise prevent Company from
performing its obligations under this Agreement or (ii) could not, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company.
2.6 COMPLIANCE; PERMITS.
2.6.1 Neither Company nor any of its subsidiaries is in conflict with, or
in default or violation of, (i) any law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or
decree applicable to Company or any of its subsidiaries or by which its or any
of their respective properties is bound or affected, or (ii) any note, bond,
mortgage, indenture, contract, agreement, lease, license, permit, franchise or
other instrument or obligation to which Company or any of its subsidiaries is a
party or by which Company or any of its subsidiaries or its or any of their
respective properties is bound or affected, except for any conflicts, defaults
or violations which could not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. To the knowledge of
Company, no investigation or review by any governmental or regulatory body or
authority is pending or threatened against Company or its subsidiaries, nor has
any governmental or regulatory body or authority indicated an intention to
conduct the same, other than, in each such case, those the outcome of which
could not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
A-7
<PAGE>
2.6.2 Company and its subsidiaries hold all permits, licenses, variances,
exemptions, orders and approvals from governmental authorities which are
material to operation of the business of Company and its subsidiaries taken as a
whole (collectively, the "Company Permits"). Company and its subsidiaries are in
compliance in all respects with the terms of the Company Permits, except where
failure to comply could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company.
2.7 SEC FILINGS; FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
2.7.1 Company has made available to Parent a correct and complete copy of
each report, schedule, registration statement and definitive proxy statement
filed by Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") since
January 1, 1996 (the "Company SEC Reports"), which are all the forms, reports
and documents required to be filed by Company with the SEC since January 1,
1996. The Company SEC Reports (A) were prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and
(B) did not at the time they were filed (or if amended or superseded by a filing
prior to the date of this Agreement then on the date of such filing) contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. None of
Company's subsidiaries is required to file any reports or other documents with
the SEC.
2.7.2 Each set of consolidated financial statements (including, in each
case, any related notes thereto) contained in the Company SEC Reports was
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP")
(including, without limitation, in accordance with the revenue recognition
principles thereof) applied on a consistent basis throughout the periods
involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto or, in the case of
unaudited statements, do not contain footnotes as permitted by Form 10-Q of the
Exchange Act) and each fairly presents the consolidated financial position of
Company and its subsidiaries as at the respective dates thereof and the
consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the periods indicated,
except that the unaudited interim financial statements were or are subject to
normal adjustments which were not or are not expected to be material in amount.
2.7.3 Company has previously furnished to Parent a complete and correct
copy of any amendments or modifications, which have not yet been filed with the
SEC but which are required to be filed, to agreements, documents or other
instruments which previously had been filed by Company with the SEC pursuant to
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
2.8 NO UNDISCLOSED LIABILITIES. Neither Company nor any of its
subsidiaries has any liabilities (absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise) of
a nature required to be disclosed on a balance sheet or in the related notes to
the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP
(including, without limitation, in accordance with the revenue recognition
principles thereof) which are, individually or in the aggregate, material to the
business, results of operations or financial condition of Company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole, except (i) liabilities provided for in Company's
balance sheet as of June 30, 1998, (ii) liabilities incurred since June 30, 1998
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices or (iii)
banking, accounting, legal and printing fees associated with the Merger.
2.9 ABSENCE OF CERTAIN CHANGES OR EVENTS. Since June 30, 1998, there has
not been: (i) any Material Adverse Effect on Company, (ii) any declaration,
setting aside or payment of any dividend on, or other distribution (whether in
cash, stock or property) in respect of, any of Company's or any of its
subsidiaries' capital stock, or any purchase, redemption or other acquisition by
Company of any of Company's capital stock or any other securities of Company or
its subsidiaries or any options, warrants, calls or rights to acquire any such
shares or other securities except for repurchases from employees following their
termination pursuant to the terms of their pre-existing stock option or purchase
agreements, (iii) any split, combination or reclassification of any of Company's
or any of its subsidiaries' capital stock, (iv) any granting by Company or any
of its subsidiaries of any increase in compensation or fringe benefits, except
for normal increases of cash compensation in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, or any payment by Company or any of its
subsidiaries of any bonus, except for bonuses made in the
A-8
<PAGE>
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, or any granting by
Company or any of its subsidiaries of any increase in severance or termination
pay or any entry by Company or any of its subsidiaries into any currently
effective employment, severance, termination or indemnification agreement or any
agreement the benefits of which are contingent or the terms of which are
materially altered upon the occurrence of a transaction involving Company of the
nature contemplated hereby, (v) entry by Company or any of its subsidiaries into
any licensing or other agreement with regard to the acquisition or disposition
of any material Intellectual Property (as defined in Section 2.19) other than
licenses in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or any
amendment or consent with respect to any licensing agreement filed or required
to be filed by Company with the SEC, (vi) any material change by Company in its
accounting methods, principles or practices, except as required by concurrent
changes in GAAP, or (vii) any revaluation by Company of any of its assets,
including, without limitation, writing down the value of capitalized inventory
or writing off notes or accounts receivable other than in the ordinary course of
business.
2.10 ABSENCE OF LITIGATION. There are no material claims, actions, suits
or proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of Company, threatened (or, to the
knowledge of Company, any governmental or regulatory investigation pending or
threatened) against Company or any of its subsidiaries as to which Company or
any of its subsidiaries has received any written notice or assertion, or any
properties or rights of Company or any of its subsidiaries, before any court,
arbitrator or administrative, governmental or regulatory authority or body,
domestic or foreign.
2.11 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
2.11.1 All employee compensation, incentive, fringe or benefit plans,
programs, policies, commitments or other arrangements (whether or not set forth
in a written document and including, without limitation, all "employee benefit
plans" within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA")) covering any active, former
employee, director or consultant of Company, any subsidiary of Company or any
trade or business (whether or not incorporated) which is a member of a
controlled group or which is under common control with Company within the
meaning of Section 414 of the Code, or with respect to which Company has or may
in the future have liability, are listed in Section 2.11.1 of the Company
Disclosure Letter (the "Plans"). Company has provided to Parent: (i) correct and
complete copies of all documents embodying each Plan including (without
limitation) all amendments thereto, all related trust documents, and all
material written agreements and contracts relating to each such Plan; (ii) the
three (3) most recent annual reports (Form Series 5500 and all schedules and
financial statements attached thereto), if any, required under ERISA or the Code
in connection with each Plan; (iii) the most recent summary plan description
together with the summary(ies) of material modifications thereto, if any,
required under ERISA with respect to each Plan; (iv) all IRS determination,
opinion, notification and advisory letters; (vi) all correspondence to or from
any governmental agency relating to any Plan; (vii) all COBRA forms and related
notices and (viii) all discrimination tests for each Plan for the most recent
plan year.
2.11.2 Each Plan has been maintained and administered in all material
respects in compliance with its terms and with the requirements prescribed by
any and all statutes, orders, rules and regulations (foreign or domestic),
including but not limited to ERISA, and the Code, which are applicable to such
Plans. No suit, action or other litigation (excluding claims for benefits
incurred in the ordinary course of Plan activities) has been brought, or to the
best knowledge of Company is threatened, against or with respect to any such
Plan. All contributions, reserves or premium payments required to be made or
accrued as of the date hereof to the Plans have been timely made or accrued.
Section 2.11.2 of the Company Disclosure Letter includes a listing of the
accrued vacation liability of Company as of October 1, 1998. Any Plan intended
to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code and each trust intended to
qualify under Section 501(a) of the Code (i) has either obtained a favorable
determination, notification, advisory and/or opinion letter, as applicable, as
to its qualified status from the Internal Revenue Service or still has a
A-9
<PAGE>
remaining period of time under applicable Treasury Regulations or Internal
Revenue Service pronouncements in which to apply for such letter and to make any
amendments necessary to obtain a favorable determination, and (ii) incorporates
or has been amended to incorporate all provisions required to comply with the
Tax Reform Act of 1986 and subsequent legislation. Company has furnished or made
available to Parent copies of the most recent Internal Revenue Service letters
and three (3) years of Form 5500 with respect to any such Plan. Company does not
have any plan or commitment to establish any new Plan, to modify any Plan
(except to the extent required by law or to conform any such Plan to the
requirements of any applicable law, in each case as previously disclosed to
Parent in writing, or as required by this Agreement), or to enter into any new
Plan. Except as provided in Section 5.8(e), each Plan can be amended, terminated
or otherwise discontinued after the Effective Time in accordance with its terms,
without liability to the Parent, Company or any of its Affiliates (other than
ordinary administration expenses).
2.11.3 Neither Company nor any Affiliate has at any time ever maintained,
established, sponsored, participated in, or contributed to any plan subject to
Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code and at no time has Company
contributed to or been requested to contribute to any "multiemployer plan," as
such term is defined in ERISA. Neither Company nor any officer or director of
Company is subject to any liability or penalty under Section 4975 through 4980B
of the Code or Title 1 of ERISA. There are no audits, inquiries or proceedings
pending or, to the knowledge of Company, threatened by the IRS or DOL with
respect to any Company Employee Plan. No "prohibited transaction," within the
meaning of Section 4975 of the Code or Sections 406 and 407 of ERISA, and not
otherwise exempt under Section 408 of ERISA, has occurred with respect to any
Company Employee Plan.
2.11.4 Neither Company nor any Affiliate has, prior to the Effective Time
and in any material respect, violated any of the health care continuation
requirements of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as
amended ("COBRA"), the requirements of FMLA or any similar provisions of state
law applicable to Company employees. None of the Plans promises or provides
retiree medical or other retiree welfare benefits to any person except as
required by applicable law, including but not limited to, COBRA, and Company has
never represented, promised or contracted (whether in oral or written form) to
provide such retiree benefits to any employee, former employee, director,
consultant or other person, except to the extent required by statute.
2.11.5 Company is not bound by or subject to (and none of its respective
assets or properties is bound by or subject to) any arrangement with any labor
union. No employee of Company is represented by any labor union or covered by
any collective bargaining agreement and, to the best knowledge of Company, no
campaign to establish such representation is in progress. There is no pending
or, to the best knowledge of Company, threatened labor dispute involving Company
and any group of its employees nor has Company experienced any labor
interruptions over the past three years, and Company considers its relationship
with its employees to be good. Company is in compliance in all material respects
with all applicable material foreign, federal, state and local laws, rules and
regulations respecting employment, employment practices, terms and conditions of
employment and wages and hours.
2.11.6 Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will (i) result in any
payment (including severance, unemployment compensation, golden parachute, bonus
or otherwise) becoming due to any stockholder, director or employee of Company
under any Plan or otherwise, (ii) materially increase any benefits otherwise
payable under any Plan, or (iii) result in the acceleration of the time of
payment or vesting of any such benefits.
A-10
<PAGE>
2.12 LABOR MATTERS. (i) There is no litigation pending or, to the
knowledge of each of Company and its respective subsidiaries, threatened,
between Company or any of its subsidiaries and any of their respective
employees; (ii) as of the date of this Agreement, neither Company nor any of
subsidiaries is a party to any collective bargaining agreement or other labor
union contract applicable to persons employed by Company or its subsidiaries nor
does Company or its subsidiaries know of any activities or proceedings of any
labor union to organize any such employees; and (iii) as of the date of this
Agreement, neither Company nor any of its subsidiaries has any knowledge of any
strikes, slowdowns, work stoppages or lockouts, or threats thereof, by or with
respect to any employees of Company or any of its subsidiaries.
2.13 REGISTRATION STATEMENT; PROXY STATEMENT. None of the information
supplied or to be supplied by Company for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in (i) the registration statement on Form S-4 to be filed with the SEC
by Parent in connection with the issuance of the Parent Common Stock in or as a
result of the Merger (the "S-4") will, at the time the S-4 becomes effective
under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading; and (ii) the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (the
"Proxy Statement/Prospectus") to be filed with the SEC by Company pursuant to
Section 5.1(a) hereof will, at the dates mailed to the stockholders of Company,
at the times of the stockholders meeting of Company (the "Company Stockholders'
Meeting") in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby and as of the
Effective Time, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made,
not misleading. The Proxy Statement/Prospectus will comply as to form in all
material respects with the provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated by the SEC thereunder.
2.14 RESTRICTIONS ON BUSINESS ACTIVITIES. There is no material agreement,
judgment, injunction, order or decree binding upon Company or any of its
subsidiaries which has or could reasonably be expected to have the effect of
prohibiting or materially impairing any business practice of Company or any of
its subsidiaries, any acquisition of property by Company or any of its
subsidiaries or the conduct of business by Company or any of its subsidiaries as
currently conducted.
2.15 TITLE TO PROPERTY. Company owns no material real property. Company
and each of its subsidiaries have good and defensible title to all of their
material properties and assets, free and clear of all liens, charges and
encumbrances except liens for taxes not yet due and payable and such liens or
other imperfections of title, if any, as do not materially detract from the
value of or interfere with the present use of the property affected thereby; and
all leases pursuant to which Company or any of its subsidiaries lease from
others material amounts of real or personal property are in good standing, valid
and effective in accordance with their respective terms, and there is not, under
any of such leases, any existing material default or event of default (or any
event which with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a material
default and in respect of which Company or subsidiary has not taken adequate
steps to prevent such default from occurring). All the plants, structures and
equipment of Company and its subsidiaries, except such as may be under
construction, are in good operating condition and repair, in all material
respects. For the purposes of this Section 2.15, the word "property" or
"properties" does not include Intellectual Property.
2.16 TAXES. Company and each of its subsidiaries, and any consolidated,
combined, unitary or aggregate group for Tax purposes of which Company or any of
its subsidiaries is or has been a member has timely filed all Tax Returns
required to be filed by it (other than those that are not, individually or in
the aggregate, material), has paid all Taxes shown thereon to be due and has
provided adequate accruals in all material respects in accordance with GAAP in
its financial statements for any Taxes that have not been paid, whether or not
shown as being due on any returns. In addition, (i) no material claim for unpaid
Taxes that are currently, or will be prior to the Effective Time, due and
payable has become a lien against the property of Company or any of its
subsidiaries or is being asserted against Company or any of its
A-11
<PAGE>
subsidiaries, (ii) no audit of any material Tax Return of Company or any of its
subsidiaries is being conducted by a Tax authority, (iii) no extension of the
statute of limitations on the assessment of any Taxes has been granted by
Company or any of its subsidiaries and is currently in effect and (iv) there is
no agreement, contract or arrangement to which Company or any of its
subsidiaries is a party that may result in the payment of any amount that would
not be deductible pursuant to Sections 280G, 162(a) (by reason of being
unreasonable in amount), 162(b) through (p) or 404 of the Code. As used herein,
"Taxes" shall mean all taxes of any kind, including, without limitation, those
on or measured by or referred to as income, gross receipts, sales, use, ad
valorem, franchise, profits, license, withholding, payroll, employment, excise,
severance, stamp, occupation, premium, value added, property or windfall profits
taxes, customs, duties or similar fees, assessments or charges of any kind
whatsoever, together with any interest and any penalties, additions to tax or
additional amounts imposed by any governmental authority, domestic or foreign.
As used herein, "Tax Return" shall mean any return, report or statement required
to be filed with any governmental authority with respect to Taxes.
2.17 ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. Company and each of its subsidiaries to their
respective knowledge (i) have obtained all applicable permits, licenses and
other authorizations which are material to the business of Company and required
under Federal, state or local laws relating to pollution or protection of the
environment, including laws relating to emissions, discharges, releases or
threatened releases of pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous or toxic materials
or wastes into ambient air, surface water, ground water, or land or otherwise
relating to the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage,
disposal, transport, or handling of pollutants, contaminants or hazardous or
toxic materials or wastes by Company or its subsidiaries (or their respective
agents); (ii) are in material compliance with all terms and conditions of such
required permits, licenses and authorizations, and also are in compliance with
all other limitations, restrictions, conditions, standards, prohibitions,
requirements, obligations, schedules and timetables contained in such laws or
contained in any regulation, code, plan, order, decree, judgment, notice or
demand letter issued, entered, promulgated or approved thereunder; (iii) as of
the date hereof, are not aware of nor have received notice of any event,
condition, circumstance, activity, practice, incident, action or plan which is
reasonably likely to interfere with or prevent continued material compliance or
which would give rise to any material common law or statutory liability, or
otherwise form the basis of any claim, action, suit or proceeding, based on or
resulting from Company's or any of its subsidiaries (or any of their respective
agents) manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage,
disposal, transport, or handling, or the emission, discharge, or release into
the environment, of any pollutant, contaminant, or hazardous or toxic material
or waste; and (iv) have taken all actions necessary under applicable
requirements of Federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations to register
any products or materials required to be registered by Company or its
subsidiaries (or any of their respective agents) thereunder.
2.18 BROKERS. No broker, finder or investment banker (other than Morgan
Stanley & Co., Incorporated) is entitled to any brokerage, finder's or other fee
or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of Company.
2.19 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. For the purposes of this Agreement, the
following terms have the following definitions:
"INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" shall mean any or all of the following and all
rights in, arising out of, or associated therewith: (i) all United
States, international and foreign patents and applications therefor and
all reissues, divisions, renewals, extensions, provisionals,
continuations and continuations-in-part thereof; (ii) all inventions
(whether patentable or not), invention disclosures, improvements, trade
secrets, proprietary information, know how, technology, technical data
and customer lists, and all documentation relating to any of the
foregoing; (iii) all copyrights, copyrights registrations and
applications therefor, and all other rights corresponding thereto
throughout the world; (iv) all industrial designs and any registrations
and applications therefor throughout the world; (v) all trade names,
logos, common law trademarks and service marks, trademark and service
mark registrations and applications therefor throughout the world; (vi)
all
A-12
<PAGE>
databases and data collections and all rights therein throughout the
world; (vii) all moral and economic rights of authors and inventors,
however denominated, throughout the world, and (viii) any similar or
equivalent rights to any of the foregoing anywhere in the world.
"COMPANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" shall mean any Intellectual Property
that is owned by, or exclusively licensed to, Company.
"REGISTERED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" means all United States,
international and foreign: (i) patents and patent applications
(including provisional applications); (ii) registered trademarks,
applications to register trademarks, intent-to-use applications, or
other registrations or applications related to trademarks; (iii)
registered copyrights and applications for copyright registration; and
(iv) any other Intellectual Property that is the subject of an
application, certificate, filing, registration or other document issued,
filed with, or recorded by any state, government or other public legal
authority.
"COMPANY REGISTERED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" means all of the Registered
Intellectual Property owned by, or filed in the name of, Company.
2.19.1 No material Company Intellectual Property or material product or
material service of Company is subject to any proceeding or outstanding decree,
order, judgment, agreement, or stipulation restricting in any manner the use,
transfer, or licensing thereof by Company, or which is reasonably likely to
affect the validity, use or enforceability of such Company Intellectual
Property.
2.19.2 Each material item of Company Registered Intellectual Property is
valid and subsisting, all necessary registration, maintenance and renewal fees
currently due in connection with such Registered Intellectual Property have been
made and all necessary documents, recordations and certificates in connection
with such Registered Intellectual Property have been filed with the relevant
patent, copyright, trademark or other authorities in the United States or
foreign jurisdictions, as the case may be, for the purposes of maintaining such
Registered Intellectual Property.
2.19.3 Company owns and has good and exclusive title to, or has license
(sufficient for the conduct of its business as currently conducted and as
proposed to be conducted) to, each material item of Company Intellectual
Property free and clear of any lien or encumbrance (excluding licenses and
related restrictions); and Company is the exclusive owner of all trademarks and
trade names used in connection with the operation or conduct of the business of
Company, including the sale of any products or the provision of any services by
Company.
2.19.4 Company owns exclusively, and has good title to, all copyrighted
works that are Company products or which Company otherwise expressly purports to
own.
2.19.5 To the extent that any material Intellectual Property has been
developed or created by a third party for Company, Company has a written
agreement with such third party with respect thereto and Company thereby either
(i) has obtained ownership of, and is the exclusive owner of, or (ii) has
obtained a license (sufficient for the conduct of its business as currently
conducted) to all such third party's Intellectual Property in such work,
material or invention to the extent it is necessary to do so.
2.19.6 Company has not transferred ownership of, or granted any exclusive
license with respect to, any Intellectual Property that is or was material
Company Intellectual Property, to any third party.
2.19.7 Section 2.19.7 of the Company Disclosure Letter lists all material
contracts, licenses and agreements to which Company is a party (i) with respect
to Company Intellectual Property licensed or transferred to any third party
(other than end-user licenses in the ordinary course); or (ii) pursuant to which
a third party has licensed or transferred any material Intellectual Property to
Company.
2.19.8 All material contracts, licenses and agreements relating to Company
Intellectual Property (other than those that, by their terms, have expired or
been terminated) are in full force and effect. The consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement will neither violate nor result in
the
A-13
<PAGE>
breach, modification, cancellation, termination, or suspension of such
contracts, licenses and agreements. Company is in material compliance with, and
has not materially breached any term of any such contracts, licenses and
agreements and, to the knowledge of Company, all other parties to such
contracts, licenses and agreements are in compliance with, and have not
materially breached any term of, such contracts, licenses and agreements.
Following the Closing Date, the Surviving Corporation will be permitted to
exercise all of Company's rights under such contracts, licenses and agreements
to the same extent Company would have been able to had the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement not occurred and without the payment of any
additional amounts or consideration other than ongoing fees, royalties or
payments which Company would otherwise be required to pay.
2.19.9 The operation of the business of Company as such business currently
is conducted, including the Company's design, development, manufacture,
marketing and sale of the products or services of Company (including products
currently in beta release) has not, does not and, to the Company's knowledge,
will not infringe or misappropriate the Intellectual Property of any third party
(provided that with respect to patent rights and trademarks and service mark
rights, such representation is limited in all cases to the Company's knowledge)
or, to its knowledge, constitute unfair competition or trade practices under the
laws of any jurisdiction.
2.19.10 Company has not received notice from any third party that the
operation of the business of Company or any act, product or service of Company,
infringes or misappropriates the Intellectual Property of any third party or
constitutes unfair competition or trade practices under the laws of any
jurisdiction.
2.19.11 To the best knowledge of Company, no person has or is infringing or
misappropriating any Company Intellectual Property.
2.19.12 Company has taken reasonable steps to protect Company's rights in
Company's confidential information and trade secrets that it wishes to protect
or any trade secrets or confidential information of third parties provided to
Company, and, without limiting the foregoing, Company has and enforces a policy
requiring each employee and contractor to execute a proprietary
information/confidentiality agreement substantially in the form provided to
Parent (or a form providing substantially the same protection) and all current
and former employees and contractors of Company have executed such an agreement,
except where the failure to do so is not reasonably expected to be material to
Company.
2.20 AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS AND COMMITMENTS. Neither Company nor any of its
subsidiaries is a party to or is bound by:
2.20.1 any employment or consulting agreement, contract or commitment with
any officer, director or member of Company's Board of Directors, other than
those that are terminable by Company or any of its subsidiaries on no more than
thirty days notice and which do so with no express (whether by contract or by
policy) liability or financial obligation to the Company;
2.20.2 any agreement or plan, including, without limitation, any stock
option plan, stock appreciation right plan or stock purchase plan, any of the
benefits of which will be increased, or the vesting of benefits of which will be
accelerated, by the occurrence of any of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement or the value of any of the benefits of which will be calculated on the
basis of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
2.20.3 any agreement of indemnification or any guaranty currently in force
other than any agreement of indemnification entered into in connection with the
sale or license or distribution or marketing of software products or services in
the ordinary course of business;
2.20.4 any agreement, contract or commitment containing any covenant
limiting in any respect the right of Company or any of its subsidiaries to
engage in any line of business or to compete with any person or granting any
exclusive distribution rights;
A-14
<PAGE>
2.20.5 any agreement, contract or commitment currently in force relating to
the disposition or acquisition by Company or any of its subsidiaries after the
date of this Agreement of a material amount of assets not in the ordinary course
of business or pursuant to which Company has any material ownership interest in
any corporation, partnership, joint venture or other business enterprise other
than Company's subsidiaries;
2.20.6 any material joint marketing or development agreement currently in
force under which Company or any of its subsidiaries have continuing material
obligations to jointly market any product, technology or service and which may
not be canceled without penalty upon notice of 90 days or less, or any material
agreement pursuant to which Company or any of its subsidiaries have continuing
material obligations to jointly develop any intellectual property that will not
be owned, in whole or in part, by Company or any of its subsidiaries and which
may not be canceled without penalty upon notice of 90 days or less;
2.20.7 any agreement, contract or commitment currently in force to provide
source code to any third party for any product or technology that is material to
Company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole; or
2.20.8 any agreement, contract or commitment currently in force to license
any third party to manufacture or reproduce any Company product, service or
technology except as a distributor in the normal course of business.
Neither Company nor any of its subsidiaries, nor to Company's knowledge any
other party to a Company Contract (as defined below), is in breach, violation or
default under, and neither Company nor any of its subsidiaries has received
written notice that it has breached, violated or defaulted under, any of the
material terms or conditions of any of the agreements, contracts or commitments
to which Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or by which it is bound
that are required to be disclosed in the Company Disclosure Letter pursuant to
this Section 2.20 hereof (any such agreement, contract or commitment, a "Company
Contract") in such a manner as would permit any other party to cancel or
terminate any such Company Contract, or would permit any other party to seek
material damages or other remedies (for any or all of such breaches, violations
or defaults, in the aggregate).
2.21 COMPANY RIGHTS PLAN. The Company Rights Plan has been amended to (i)
render the Company Rights Plan inapplicable to the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement,
the Company Affiliate Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements, (ii) ensure
that (y) neither Parent nor Merger Sub, nor any of their affiliates shall be
deemed to have become an Acquiring Person (as defined in the Company Rights
Plan) pursuant to the Company Rights Plan solely by virtue of the execution of
this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement, the Company Affiliate
Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements of the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby or thereby and (z) a Distribution Date, a
Section 11(a)(ii) Trigger Date or a Shares Acquisition Date (as such terms are
defined in the Company Rights Plan) or similar event does not occur by reason of
the execution of this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement, the Company
Affiliate Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements, the consummation of the
Merger, or the consummation of the other transactions, contemplated hereby and
thereby, (iii) provide that the exercise of rights under the Company Rights Plan
shall expire immediately prior to the Effective Time, and (iv) that such
amendment may not be further amended by the Company without the prior consent of
Parent in its sole discretion.
2.22 INSURANCE. Company maintains insurance policies and fidelity bonds
covering the assets, business, equipment, properties, operations, employees,
officers and directors of Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, the
"Insurance Policies") which are of the type and in amounts customarily carried
by persons conducting businesses similar to those of Company and its
subsidiaries. There is no material claim by Company or any of its subsidiaries
pending under any of the material Insurance Policies as to which coverage has
been questioned, denied or disputed by the underwriters of such policies or
bonds.
A-15
<PAGE>
2.23 OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR. Company has been advised in writing by
its financial advisor, Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, that in its opinion,
as of the date of this Agreement, the Exchange Ratio is fair to the stockholders
of Company from a financial point of view.
2.24 BOARD APPROVAL. The Board of Directors of Company has, as of the date
of this Agreement (i) approved, subject to stockholder approval, this Agreement
and the Company Option Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and
thereby, (ii) determined that the Merger is in the best interests of the
stockholders of Company and is on terms that are fair to such stockholders and
(iii) recommended that the stockholders of Company approve this Agreement and
the Merger.
2.25 VOTE REQUIRED. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes that
holders of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock are entitled to vote
thereon is the only vote of the holders of any class or series of Company's
capital stock necessary to approve this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby.
2.26 STATE TAKEOVER STATUTES. The Board of Directors of the Company has
approved the Merger, this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement, the
Company Affiliate Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements, and such
approval is sufficient to render inapplicable to the Merger, this Agreement, the
Company Stock Option Agreement, the Company Affiliate Agreements and the Company
Voting Agreements and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the
Company Stock Option Agreement, the Company Affiliate Agreements and the Company
Voting Agreements, the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law to the extent, if any, such Section is applicable to the Merger,
this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement, the Company Affiliate
Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements and the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement, the Company Affiliate
Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements (assuming that Parent and its
"affiliates" and "associates" (as defined under both Section 203 of the Delaware
Statute and Rule 405 under the Securities Act), collectively beneficially own
and have beneficially owned at all times during the three-year period prior to
the date hereof less than 1% of the shares of Company Common Stock outstanding,
other than shares of Company Common Stock issuable pursuant to the Company
Option Agreement to be entered into concurrently herewith). To the Company's
knowledge after consultation with the Company's outside counsel, no other state
takeover statute or similar statute or regulation applies to or purports to
apply to the Merger, this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement, the
Company Affiliate Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement,
the Company Affiliate Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Parent and Merger Sub jointly and severally represent and warrant to
Company, subject to such exceptions as are set forth in the Parent SEC Reports
(as defined in Section 3.6 or specifically disclosed in the disclosure letter
(referencing the appropriate section and paragraph number) delivered by Parent
and Sub to Company on or prior to the date of this Agreement (the "Parent
Disclosure Letter"), as follows:
3.1 ORGANIZATION AND QUALIFICATION; SUBSIDIARIES. Each of Parent and its
subsidiaries is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation and has the
requisite corporate power and authority to own, lease and operate its assets and
properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. Each of
Parent and its subsidiaries is in possession of all Approvals necessary to own,
lease and operate the properties it purports to own, operate or lease and to
carry on its business as it is now being conducted, except where the failure to
have such Approvals would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material
Adverse Effect on Parent. Each of Parent and its subsidiaries is duly qualified
or licensed as a foreign corporation to do business, and is in good standing, in
each jurisdiction where the character of the properties owned, leased or
operated by it or the nature of its
A-16
<PAGE>
activities makes such qualification or licensing necessary, except for such
failures to be so duly qualified or licensed and in good standing that would
not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on
Parent.
3.2 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS. Parent has previously
furnished to Company a complete and correct copy of its Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws as amended to date. Such Certificate of Incorporation,
Bylaws and equivalent organizational documents of each of its subsidiaries are
in full force and effect. Neither Parent nor any of its subsidiaries is in
violation of any of the provisions of its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws
or equivalent organizational documents.
3.3 CAPITALIZATION. The authorized capital stock of Parent consists of (i)
500,000,000 shares of Parent Common Stock and of (ii) 5,000,000 shares of
Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share ("Parent Preferred Stock"), 440,000 of
which have been designated as Series A-1 Preferred Stock and 80,000 of which
have been designated as Series B Preferred Stock. At the close of business on
September 30, 1998 (i) 172,310,746 shares of Parent Common Stock were issued and
outstanding, all of which are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, (ii)
248,975 shares of Parent Common Stock were held in treasury by Parent or by
subsidiaries of Parent, (iii) 2,837,759 shares of Parent Common Stock were
reserved for future issuance pursuant to Parent's employee stock purchase plan,
(iv) 18,140,543 shares of Parent Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon
the exercise of outstanding options ("Parent Options") to purchase Parent Common
Stock. As of the date hereof, no shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock and 32,000
shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued or outstanding. A warrant to
purchase 80,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 951,891 shares of Parent Common Stock, associated with the exercise
of Series B Preferred Stock, were outstanding as of the date hereof. The
authorized capital stock of Merger Sub consists of 1,000 shares of common stock,
par value $0.001 per share, all of which, as of the date hereof, are issued and
outstanding. All of the outstanding shares of Parent's and Merger Sub's
respective capital stock have been duly authorized and validly issued and are
fully paid and nonassessable. All shares of Parent Common Stock subject to
issuance as aforesaid, upon issuance on the terms and conditions specified in
the instruments pursuant to which they are issuable, shall, and the shares of
Parent Common Stock to be issued pursuant to the Merger will be, duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. All of the outstanding
shares of capital stock (other than directors' qualifying shares) of each of
Parent's subsidiaries is duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable and all such shares (other than directors' qualifying shares) are
owned by Parent or another subsidiary free and clear of all security interests,
liens, claims, pledges, agreements, limitations in Parent's voting rights,
charges or other encumbrances of any nature whatsoever.
3.4 AUTHORITY RELATIVE TO THIS AGREEMENT. Each of Parent and Merger Sub
has all necessary corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this
Agreement and the Company Option Agreement, and to perform its obligations
hereunder and thereunder, subject to obtaining the approval of Parent's
stockholders of the issuance of Parent Common Stock in the Merger, to consummate
the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby. The execution and delivery of
this Agreement and the Company Option Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub and the
consummation by Parent and Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby
and thereby have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate
action on the part of Parent and Merger Sub and no other corporate proceedings
on the part of Parent or Merger Sub are necessary to authorize this Agreement
and the Company Option Agreement, or to consummate the transactions so
contemplated. This Agreement and the Company Option Agreement have been duly and
validly executed and delivered by Parent and Merger Sub and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by Company, constitute legal and binding
obligations of Parent and Merger Sub, enforceable against Parent and Merger Sub
in accordance with their respective terms.
3.5 NO CONFLICT; REQUIRED FILINGS AND CONSENTS.
3.5.1 The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub
and the Company Option Agreement by Parent do not, and the performance of this
Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub and the Company Option Agreement by Parent
shall not, (i) conflict with or violate the Certificate of
A-17
<PAGE>
Incorporation, Bylaws or equivalent organizational documents of Parent or any of
its subsidiaries, (ii) subject to compliance with the requirements set forth in
Section 3.5.2 below, conflict with or violate any law, rule, regulation, order,
judgment or decree applicable to Parent or any of its subsidiaries or by which
it or their respective properties are bound or affected, or (iii) result in any
breach of or constitute a default (or an event that with notice or lapse of time
or both would become a default) under, or impair Parent's or any such
subsidiary's rights or alter the rights or obligations of any third party under,
or give to others any rights of termination, amendment, acceleration or
cancellation of, or result in the creation of a lien or encumbrance on any of
the properties or assets of Parent or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to, any
material note, bond, mortgage, indenture, contract, agreement, lease, license,
permit, franchise or other instrument or obligation to which Parent or any of
its subsidiaries is a party or by which Parent or any of its subsidiaries or its
or any of their respective properties are bound or affected.
3.5.2 The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub
and the Company Option Agreement by Parent do not, and the performance of this
Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub shall not, require any consent, approval,
authorization or permit of, or filing with or notification to, any Governmental
Entity except (i) for applicable requirements, if any, of the Securities Act,
the Exchange Act, Blue Sky Laws, the pre-merger notification requirements of the
HSR Act and of foreign governmental entities and the rules and regulations
thereunder, the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and the filing
and recordation of the Certificate or Merger as required by the Delaware General
Corporation Law and (ii) where the failure to obtain such consents, approvals,
authorizations or permits, or to make such filings or notifications, (i) would
not prevent consummation of the Merger or otherwise prevent Parent or Sub from
performing their respective obligations under this Agreement or (ii) could not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on Parent.
3.6 SEC FILINGS; FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
3.6.1 Parent has made available to Company a correct and complete copy of
each report, schedule, registration statement and definitive proxy statement
filed by Parent with the SEC on or after January 1, 1997 and prior to the date
of this Agreement (the "Parent SEC Reports"), which are all the forms, reports
and documents required to be filed by Parent with the SEC since January 1, 1997.
The Parent SEC Reports (A) were prepared in accordance with the requirements of
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and (B) did not at
the time they were filed (or if amended or superseded by a filing prior to the
date of this Agreement then on the date of such filing) contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. None of Parent's
subsidiaries is required to file any reports or other documents with the SEC.
3.6.2 Each set of consolidated financial statements (including, in each
case, any related notes thereto) contained in the Parent SEC Reports was
prepared in accordance with GAAP (including, without limitation, in accordance
with the revenue recognition provisions thereof) applied on a consistent basis
throughout the periods involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto
or, in the case of unaudited statements, do not contain footnotes as permitted
by Form 10-Q of the Exchange Act) and each fairly presents the consolidated
financial position of Parent and its subsidiaries as at the respective dates
thereof and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the
periods indicated, except that the unaudited interim financial statements were
or are subject to normal adjustments which were not or are not expected to be
material in amount.
3.6.3 Parent has previously furnished to Company a complete and correct
copy of any amendments or modifications, which have not yet been filed with the
SEC but which are required to be filed, to agreements, documents or other
instruments which previously had been filed by Parent with the SEC pursuant to
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
3.6.4 Parent has filed all the reports required to be filed under the
Exchange Act during the preceding twelve months.
A-18
<PAGE>
3.7 ABSENCE OF CERTAIN CHANGES OR EVENTS. Since June 30, 1998, Parent and
its subsidiaries have conducted their businesses only in the ordinary course and
in a manner consistent with past practice and, since such date, there has not
been (i) any Material Adverse Effect on Parent or (ii) any material change by
Parent in its accounting methods, principles or practices except as required by
concurrent changes in GAAP.
3.8 ABSENCE OF LITIGATION. Except as set forth in the Parent SEC Reports,
there are no material claims, actions, suits or proceedings pending or, to the
knowledge of Parent, threatened (or to the knowledge of Parent, any governmental
or regulatory investigation pending or threatened) against Parent or any of its
subsidiaries as to which Parent or any of its subsidiaries has received any
written notice or assertion, or any properties or rights of Parent or any of its
subsidiaries, before any court, arbitrator or administrative, governmental or
regulatory authority or body, domestic or foreign.
3.9 REGISTRATION STATEMENT; PROXY STATEMENT. None of the information
supplied or to be supplied by Parent for inclusion or incorporation by reference
in (i) the S-4 will, at the time the S-4 becomes effective under the Securities
Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not
misleading; and (ii) the Proxy Statement/Prospectus will, at the dates mailed to
the stockholders of Company, at the time of the Company Stockholders Meeting and
as of the Effective Time, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading. The S-4 will comply as to form in all material
respects with the provisions of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC thereunder.
3.10 BOARD APPROVAL. The Board of Directors of Parent has, as of the date
hereof, (i) approved this Agreement, the Merger Agreement, the Company Option
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby and (ii)
determined that the Merger is in the best interests of the stockholders of
Parent and is on terms that are fair to such stockholders.
3.11 INTERIM OPERATIONS OF MERGER SUB. Merger Sub was formed solely for
the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated hereby, has engaged in
no other business activities and has conducted its operations only as
contemplated hereby.
3.12 PARENT OWNERSHIP OF COMPANY COMMON STOCK. Parent and, to the best
knowledge of Parent, its "affiliates" and "associates" (as defined under both
Section 203 of the Delaware Statute and Rule 405 under the Securities Act),
collectively beneficially own and have beneficially owned at all times during
the three-year period prior to the date hereof less than 1% of the shares of
Company Common Stock outstanding (other than shares of Company Common Stock
issuable pursuant to the Company Option Agreement to be entered into
concurrently herewith).
ARTICLE IV
CONDUCT PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME
4.1 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS BY COMPANY. During the period from the date of
this Agreement and continuing until the earlier of the termination of this
Agreement pursuant to its terms or the Effective Time, Company and each of its
subsidiaries shall, except to the extent that Parent shall otherwise consent in
writing, carry on its business, in all material respects, in the usual, regular
and ordinary course, in substantially the same manner as heretofore conducted
and in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, pay its debts and
taxes when due subject to good faith disputes over such debts or taxes, pay or
perform other material obligations when due, and use its commercially reasonable
efforts consistent with past practices and policies to (i) preserve intact its
present business organization, (ii) keep available the services of its present
officers and employees and (iii) preserve its relationships with customers,
suppliers, distributors, licensors, licensees, and others with which it has
business dealings.
A-19
<PAGE>
In addition, except as permitted by the terms of this Agreement, and except
as provided in Section 4.1 of the Company Disclosure Letter, without the prior
written consent of Parent, during the period from the date of this Agreement and
continuing until the earlier of the termination of this Agreement pursuant to
its terms or the Effective Time, Company shall not do any of the following and
shall not permit its subsidiaries to do any of the following:
(a) Waive any stock repurchase rights, accelerate, amend or change the
period of exercisability of options or restricted stock, or reprice options
granted under any employee, consultant, director or other stock plans or
authorize cash payments in exchange for any options granted under any of such
plans;
(b) Grant any severance or termination pay to any officer or employee except
pursuant to written agreements outstanding, or policies existing, on the date
hereof and as previously disclosed in writing or made available to Parent, or
adopt any new severance plan;
(c) Transfer or license to any person or entity or otherwise extend, amend
or modify in any material respect any rights to the Company Intellectual
Property, or enter into grants to transfer or license to any person future
patent rights, other than non-exclusive licenses in the ordinary course of
business and consistent with past practice;
(d) Declare, set aside or pay any dividends on or make any other
distributions (whether in cash, stock, equity securities or property) in respect
of any capital stock or split, combine or reclassify any capital stock or issue
or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or
in substitution for any capital stock;
(e) Purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any
shares of capital stock of Company or its subsidiaries, except repurchases of
unvested shares at cost in connection with the termination of the service
relationship with any employee or consultant pursuant to stock option or
purchase agreements in effect on the date hereof;
(f) Issue, deliver, sell, authorize, pledge or otherwise encumber or propose
any of the foregoing of, any shares of capital stock or any securities
convertible into shares of capital stock, or subscriptions, rights, warrants or
options to acquire any shares of capital stock or any securities convertible
into shares of capital stock, or enter into other agreements or commitments of
any character obligating it to issue any such shares or convertible securities,
other than (x) the issuance delivery and/or sale of (i) shares of Company Common
Stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options or warrants therefor outstanding
as of the date of this Agreement, and (ii) shares of Company Common Stock
issuable to participants in the ESPP consistent with the terms thereof and (y)
the granting of stock options (and the issuance of Common Stock upon exercise
thereof), in the ordinary course and consistent with past practices, in an
amount not to exceed options to purchase (and the issuance of Common Stock upon
exercise thereof) 60,000 shares in the aggregate;
(g) Cause, permit or propose any amendments to its Certificate of
Incorporation, Bylaws or other charter documents (or similar governing
instruments of any of its subsidiaries);
(h) Acquire or agree to acquire by merging or consolidating with, or by
purchasing any equity interest in or a portion of the assets of, or by any other
manner, any business or any corporation, partnership, association or other
business organization or division thereof, or otherwise acquire or agree to
acquire any assets which are material, individually or in the aggregate, to the
business of Company or enter into any material joint ventures, strategic
partnerships or alliances;
(i) Sell, lease, license, encumber or otherwise dispose of any properties or
assets which are material, individually or in the aggregate, to the business of
Company, except sales or licenses of product or inventory in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice;
(j) Incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantee any such
indebtedness of another person, issue or sell any debt securities or options,
warrants, calls or other rights to acquire any debt
A-20
<PAGE>
securities of Company, enter into any "keep well" or other agreement to maintain
any financial statement condition or enter into any arrangement having the
economic effect of any of the foregoing other than (i) in connection with the
financing of ordinary course trade payables consistent with past practice or
(ii) pursuant to existing credit facilities in the ordinary course of business;
(k) Adopt or amend any employee benefit plan or employee stock purchase or
employee stock option plan, or enter into any employment contract or collective
bargaining agreement (other than offer letters and letter agreements entered
into in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice with
employees who are terminable "at will,"), pay any special bonus or special
remuneration to any director or employee, or increase the salaries or wage rates
or fringe benefits (including rights to severance or indemnification) of its
directors, officers, employees or consultants other than in the ordinary course
of business, consistent with past practice, or change in any material respect
any management policies or procedures;
(l) Make any individual or series of related payments outside of the
ordinary course of business in excess of $100,000, other than banking,
accounting, legal and printing fees associated with the Merger;
(m) except in the ordinary course of business, modify, amend or terminate
any material contract or agreement to which Company or any subsidiary thereof is
a party or waive, release or assign any material rights or claims thereunder;
(n) enter into any contracts, agreements, or obligations relating to the
distribution, sale, license or marketing by third parties of Company's products
or products licensed by Company other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, but in no event shall Company enter into any
exclusive distribution arrangement;
(o) materially revalue any of its assets or, except as required by GAAP,
make any change in accounting methods, principles or practices;
(p) Engage in any action that could reasonably be expected to cause the
Merger to fail to qualify as a "reorganization" under Section 368(a) of the
Code;
(q) Engage in any action with the intent to directly or indirectly adversely
impact any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; or
(r) Agree in writing or otherwise to take any of the actions described in
Article 4 (a) through (q) above.
4.2 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS BY PARENT. During the period from the date of this
Agreement and continuing until the earlier of the termination of this Agreement
pursuant to its terms or the Effective Time, except as permitted by the terms of
this Agreement and except as provided in Section 4.2 of the Parent Disclosure
Letter, without the prior written consent of Company (which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld), during the period from the date of this Agreement and
continuing until the earlier of the termination of this Agreement pursuant to
its terms or the Effective Time, Parent shall not do any of the following:
(a) Declare, set aside or pay any dividends on or make any other
distributions (whether in cash, stock, equity securities or property) in respect
of any capital stock or split, combine or reclassify any capital stock or issue
or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or
in substitution for any capital stock; or
(b) Engage in any action that could reasonably be expected to cause the
Merger to fail to qualify as a "reorganization" under Section 368(a) of the
Code.
A-21
<PAGE>
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
5.1 PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS; REGISTRATION STATEMENT; OTHER FILINGS;
BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS. As promptly as practicable after the execution of this
Agreement, Company and Parent will prepare, and file with the SEC, the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and Parent will prepare and file with the SEC the
Registration Statement in which the Proxy Statement/Prospectus will be included
as a prospectus. Each of Company and Parent will respond to any comments of the
SEC, will use its respective commercially reasonable efforts to have the
Registration Statement declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly
as practicable after such filing and Company will cause the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus to be mailed to its stockholders at the earliest
practicable time after the Registration Statement is declared effective by the
SEC. As promptly as practicable after the date of this Agreement, each of
Company and Parent will prepare and file any other filings required to be filed
by it under the Exchange Act, the Securities Act or any other Federal, foreign
or Blue Sky or related laws relating to the Merger and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (the "Other Filings"). Each of Company and Parent
will notify the other promptly upon the receipt of any comments from the SEC or
its staff or any other government officials and of any request by the SEC or its
staff or any other government officials for amendments or supplements to the
Registration Statement, the Proxy Statement/Prospectus or any Other Filing or
for additional information and will supply the other with copies of all
correspondence between such party or any of its representatives, on the one
hand, and the SEC, or its staff or any other government officials, on the other
hand, with respect to the Registration Statement, the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, the Merger or any Other Filing. Each of Company and Parent
will cause all documents that it is responsible for filing with the SEC or other
regulatory authorities under this Section 5.1(a) to comply in all material
respects with all applicable requirements of law and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. Whenever any event occurs which is required to be set
forth in an amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the
Registration Statement or any Other Filing, Company or Parent, as the case may
be, will promptly inform the other of such occurrence and cooperate in filing
with the SEC or its staff or any other government officials, and/or mailing to
stockholders of Company, such amendment or supplement.
5.2 MEETING OF COMPANY STOCKHOLDERS.
(a) Promptly after the date hereof, Company will take all action necessary
in accordance with the Delaware Law and its Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws to convene the Company Stockholders' Meeting to be held as promptly as
practicable, and in any event (to the extent permissible under applicable law)
within 45 days after the declaration of effectiveness of the Registration
Statement, for the purpose of voting upon this Agreement and the Merger. Company
will use its commercially reasonable efforts to solicit from its stockholders
proxies in favor of the adoption and approval of this Agreement and the approval
of the Merger and will take all other action necessary or advisable to secure
the vote or consent of its stockholders required by the rules of Nasdaq or
Delaware Law to obtain such approvals. Notwithstanding the anything to the
contrary contained in this Agreement, Company may adjourn or postpone the
Company Stockholders' Meeting to the extent necessary to ensure that any
necessary supplement or amendment to the Prospectus/Proxy Statement is provided
to Company's stockholders in advance of a vote on the Merger and this Agreement
or, if as of the time for which Company Stockholders' Meeting is originally
scheduled (as set forth in the Prospectus/Proxy Statement) there are
insufficient shares of Company Common Stock represented (either in person or by
proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the business of the Company's
Stockholders' Meeting. Company shall ensure that the Company Stockholders'
Meeting is called, noticed, convened, held and conducted, and subject to Section
5.2(c) that all proxies solicited by the Company in connection with the Company
Stockholders' Meeting are solicited, in compliance with the Delaware Law, its
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, the rules of Nasdaq and all other
applicable legal requirements. Company's obligation to call, give notice of,
convene and hold the Company Stockholders' Meeting in accordance with this
Section 5.2(a) shall not be limited to or otherwise affected by the
commencement, disclosure, announcement or submission to Company of any
Acquisition
A-22
<PAGE>
Proposal, or by any withdrawal, amendment or modification of the recommendation
of the Board of Directors of Company with respect to the Merger.
(b) Subject to Section 5.2(c): (i) the Board of Directors of Company shall
unanimously recommend that Company's stockholders vote in favor of and adopt and
approve this Agreement and the Merger at the Company Stockholders' Meeting; (ii)
the Prospectus/Proxy Statement shall include a statement to the effect that the
Board of Directors of the Company has unanimously recommended that Company's
stockholders vote in favor of and adopt and approve this Agreement and the
Merger at the Company Stockholders' Meeting; and (iii) neither the Board of
Directors of Company nor any committee thereof shall withdraw, amend or modify,
or propose or resolve to withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to
Parent, the unanimous recommendation of the Board of Directors of Company that
Company's stockholders vote in favor of and adopt and approve this Agreement and
the Merger. For purposes of this Agreement, said recommendation of the Board of
Directors shall be deemed to have been modified in a manner adverse to Parent if
said recommendation shall no longer be unanimous.
(c) Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the Board of Directors of
Company from withholding, withdrawing, amending or modifying its unanimous
recommendation in favor of the Merger, or from endorsing or recommending to its
stockholders a Superior Offer (as defined below) if (i) a Superior Offer is made
to the Company and is not withdrawn, (ii) neither Company nor any of its
representatives shall have violated any of the restrictions set forth in Section
5.4 with respect to such Superior Offer or the party making such offer (or any
affiliate or associate of such party), and (iii) the Board of Directors of
Company or any committee thereof concludes in good faith, after consultation
with its outside counsel, that, in light of such Superior Offer, the
withholding, withdrawal, amendment or modification of such recommendation, and
the endorsement or recommendation of such Superior Offer, is required in order
for the Board of Directors of Company or any committee thereof to comply with
its fiduciary obligations to Company's stockholders under applicable law.
Subject to applicable laws, nothing contained in this Section 5.2 shall limit
Company's obligation to hold and convene the Company Stockholders' Meeting
(regardless of whether the unanimous recommendation of the Board of Directors of
the Company shall have been withdrawn, amended or modified). For purposes of
this Agreement ("Superior Offer") shall mean an unsolicited, bona fide written
offer made by a third party to consummate any of the following transactions: (i)
a merger, consolidation, business combination, recapitalization, liquidation,
dissolution or similar transaction involving Company pursuant to which the
stockholders of Company immediately preceding such transaction hold less than
50% of the equity interest in the surviving or resulting entity of such
transaction; (ii) a sale or other disposition by Company of assets (excluding
inventory and used equipment sold in the ordinary course of business)
representing in excess of 50% of the fair market value of Company's business
immediately prior to such sale, or (iii) the acquisition by any person or group
(including by way of a tender offer or an exchange offer or issuance by
Company), directly or indirectly, of beneficial ownership or a right to acquire
beneficial ownership of shares representing in excess of 50% of the voting power
of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company, on terms that
the Board of Directors of Company determines, in its reasonable judgment, after
consultation with its financial advisor, to be more favorable to the Company
stockholders than the terms of the Merger; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that any such
offer shall not be deemed to be a "Superior Offer" if any financing required to
consummate the transaction contemplated by such offer is not committed and is
not likely in the judgment of Company's Board of Directors to be obtained by
such third party on a timely basis.
5.3 CONFIDENTIALITY; ACCESS TO INFORMATION.
(a) The parties acknowledge that Company and Parent have previously executed
a Confidentiality Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1998 (the "Confidentiality
Agreement"), which Confidentiality Agreement will continue in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms.
(b) Access to Information. Company will afford Parent and its accountants,
counsel and other representatives reasonable access during normal business hours
to the properties, books, records and personnel of Company during the period
prior to the Effective Time to obtain all information concerning
A-23
<PAGE>
the business, including the status of product development efforts, properties,
results of operations and personnel of Company, as Parent may reasonably
request. No information or knowledge obtained by Parent in any investigation
pursuant to this Section 5.3 will affect or be deemed to modify any
representation or warranty contained herein or the conditions to the obligations
of the parties to consummate the Merger.
5.4 NO SOLICITATION.
(a) From and after the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time or
termination of this Agreement pursuant to Article V5, Company and its
subsidiaries will not, nor will they authorize or permit any of their respective
officers, directors, affiliates or employees or any investment banker, attorney
or other advisor or representative retained by any of them to, directly or
indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate, encourage or induce the making, submission or
announcement of any Acquisition Proposal (as hereinafter defined), (ii)
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any
person any nonpublic information with respect to, or take any other action to
facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes or may
reasonably be expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal, (iii) engage in
discussions with any person with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, except as
to the existence of these provisions, (iv) subject to Section 5.2(c), approve,
endorse or recommend any Acquisition Proposal or (v) enter into any letter of
intent or similar document or any contract agreement or commitment contemplating
or otherwise relating to any Acquisition Transaction; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that
prior to the approval of this Agreement by the required Company Stockholder
Vote, this Section 5.4(a) shall not prohibit Company from (A) furnishing
nonpublic information regarding Company and its subsidiaries to, entering into a
confidentiality agreement with or entering into discussions or negotiations
with, any person or group in response to a Superior Offer submitted by such
person or group (and not withdrawn) if (1) neither Company nor any
representative of Company and its subsidiaries shall have violated any of the
restrictions set forth in this Section 5.4 with respect to such person or group
making such Superior Offer (or any affiliate or associate of such person or
group), (2) the Board of Directors of Company concludes in good faith, after
consultation with its outside legal counsel, that such action is required in
order for the Board of Directors of Company to comply with its fiduciary
obligations to Company's stockholders under applicable law, (3) prior to
furnishing any such nonpublic information to, or entering into discussions or
negotiations with, such person or group, Company gives Parent written notice of
the identity of such person or group and of Company's intention to furnish
nonpublic information to, or enter into discussions or negotiations with, such
person or group and the Company receives from such person or group an executed
confidentiality agreement containing customary limitations on the use and
disclosure of all nonpublic written and oral information furnished to such
person or group by or on behalf of the Company, and (4) contemporaneously with
furnishing any such nonpublic information to such person or group, Company
furnishes such nonpublic information to Parent (to the extent such nonpublic
information has not been previously furnished by the Company to Parent) or (B)
complying with Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act with
regard to an Acquisition Proposal. Company and its subsidiaries will immediately
cease any and all existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any
parties conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. Without
limiting the foregoing, it is understood that any violation of the restrictions
set forth in the preceding two sentences by any officer or director of Company
or any of its subsidiaries or any investment banker, attorney or other advisor
or representative (excluding non-officer employees) of Company or any of its
subsidiaries shall be deemed to be a breach of this Section 5.4 by Company. In
addition to the foregoing, the Company shall (i) provide Parent with at least 24
hours prior notice (or such lesser prior notice as provided to the members of
Company's Board of Directors but in no event less than eight hours) of any
meeting of Company's Board of Directors at which Company's Board of Directors is
reasonably expected to consider a Superior Offer and (ii) provide Parent with at
least two (2) business days or forty-eight (48) hours prior written notice of a
meeting of Company's Board of Directors at which Company's Board of Directors is
reasonably expected to recommend a Superior Offer to its stockholders and
together with such notice a copy of the definitive documentation relating to
such Superior Offer, to the extent available.
A-24
<PAGE>
For purposes of this Agreement, "Acquisition Proposal" shall mean any offer
or proposal (other than an offer or proposal by Parent) relating to any
Acquisition Transaction. For the purposes of this Agreement, "Acquisition
Transaction" shall mean any transaction or series of related transactions other
than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement involving: (A) any
acquisition or purchase from the Company by any person or "group" (as defined
under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder) of more than a 15% interest in the total outstanding voting
securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or any tender offer or
exchange offer that if consummated would result in any person or "group" (as
defined under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder) beneficially owning 15% or more of the total outstanding voting
securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or any merger,
consolidation, business combination or similar transaction involving the Company
pursuant to which the stockholders of the Company immediately preceding such
transaction hold less than 85% of the equity interests in the surviving or
resulting entity of such transaction; (B) any sale, lease (other than in the
ordinary course of business), exchange, transfer, license (other than in the
ordinary course of business), acquisition or disposition of more than 50% of the
assets of the Company; or (C) any liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
(b) In addition to the obligations of Company set forth in paragraph (a) of
this Section 5.4, Company as promptly as practicable shall advise Parent orally
and in writing of any request for nonpublic information which Company reasonably
believes would lead to an Acquisition Proposal or of any Acquisition Proposal,
or any inquiry with respect to or which Company reasonably should believe would
lead to any Acquisition Proposal, the material terms and conditions of such
request, Acquisition Proposal or inquiry, and the identity of the person or
group making any such request, Acquisition Proposal or inquiry. Company will
keep Parent informed in all material respects of the status and details
(including material amendments or proposed amendments) of any such request,
Acquisition Proposal or inquiry.
5.5 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Parent and Company will consult with each other,
and to the extent practicable, agree, before issuing any press release or
otherwise making any public statement with respect to the Merger, this Agreement
or an Acquisition Proposal and will not issue any such press release or make any
such public statement prior to such consultation, except as may be required by
law or any listing agreement with a national securities exchange or Nasdaq. The
parties have agreed to the text of the joint press release announcing the
signing of this Agreement.
5.6 REASONABLE EFFORTS; NOTIFICATION.
(a) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement, each of the parties agrees to use all reasonable efforts to take, or
cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist
and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary, proper or
advisable to consummate and make effective, in the most expeditious manner
practicable, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including using reasonable efforts to accomplish the following: (i)
the taking of all reasonable acts necessary to cause the conditions precedent
set forth in Article VI to be satisfied, (ii) the obtaining of all necessary
actions or nonactions, waivers, consents, approvals, orders and authorizations
from Governmental Entities and the making of all necessary registrations,
declarations and filings (including registrations, declarations and filings with
Governmental Entities, if any) and the taking of all reasonable steps as may be
necessary to avoid any suit, claim, action, investigation or proceeding by any
Governmental Entity, (iii) the defending of any suits, claims, actions,
investigations or proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging
this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby,
including seeking to have any stay or temporary restraining order entered by any
court or other Governmental Entity vacated or reversed and (iv) the execution or
delivery of any additional instruments necessary to consummate the transactions
contemplated by, and to fully carry out the purposes of, this Agreement. In
connection with and without limiting the foregoing, Company and its Board of
Directors shall, if any state takeover statute or similar statute or regulation
is or becomes applicable to the Merger, this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, use all reasonable efforts to
ensure that the Merger and the other transactions
A-25
<PAGE>
contemplated by this Agreement may be consummated as promptly as practicable on
the terms contemplated by this Agreement and otherwise to minimize the effect of
such statute or regulation on the Merger, this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, nothing in
this Agreement shall be deemed to require Parent or Company or any subsidiary or
affiliate thereof to agree to any divestiture by itself or any of its affiliates
of shares of capital stock or of any business, assets or property, or the
imposition of any material limitation on the ability of any of them to conduct
their businesses or to own or exercise control of such assets, properties and
stock.
(b) Company shall give prompt notice to Parent of any representation or
warranty made by it contained in this Agreement becoming untrue or inaccurate,
or any failure of Company to comply with or satisfy in any material respect any
covenant, condition or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it under
this Agreement, in each case, such that the conditions set forth in Section
6.3(a) or 6.3(b) would not be satisfied, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that no such
notification shall affect the representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements of the parties or the conditions to the obligations of the parties
under this Agreement.
(c) Parent shall give prompt notice to Company of any representation or
warranty made by it or Merger Sub contained in this Agreement becoming untrue or
inaccurate, or any failure of Parent or Merger Sub to comply with or satisfy in
any material respect any covenant, condition or agreement to be complied with or
satisfied by it under this Agreement, in each case, such that the conditions set
forth in Section 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) would not be satisfied, PROVIDED, HOWEVER,
that no such notification shall affect the representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements of the parties or the conditions to the obligations of
the parties under this Agreement.
5.7 THIRD PARTY CONSENTS. As soon as practicable following the date
hereof, Parent and Company will each use its commercially reasonable efforts to
obtain any consents, waivers and approvals under any of its or its subsidiaries'
respective agreements, contracts, licenses or leases required to be obtained in
connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
5.8 STOCK OPTIONS AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS.
(a) At the Effective Time, each outstanding option to purchase shares of
Company Common Stock (each, a "Company Stock Option") under Company's 1995 Stock
Option Plan (including options granted under the predecessor 1991 Stock Option
Plan) and Supplemental Stock Option Plan or as described in Section 2.3(viii)
hereof, whether or not exercisable, whether or not vested, shall by virtue of
the Merger and without any further action on the part of Company or the holder
thereof, be assumed by Parent in such manner that Parent (i) is "assuming a
stock option in a transaction to which Section 424(a) applied" within the
meaning of Section 424 of the Code, or (ii) to the extent that Section 424 of
the Code does not apply to any such Company Stock Options, would be a
transaction within Section 424 of the Code. Each Company Stock Option so assumed
by Parent under this Agreement will continue to have, and be subject to, the
same terms and conditions of such options immediately prior to the Effective
Time (including, without limitation, any repurchase rights or vesting
provisions), except that (1) each Company Stock Option will be exercisable (or
will become exercisable in accordance with its terms) for the number of whole
shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the product of the number of shares of
Company Common Stock that were issuable upon exercise of such Company Stock
Option immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the Exchange Ratio,
rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of Parent Common Stock and
(2) the per share exercise price for the shares of Parent Common Stock issuable
upon exercise of such assumed Company Stock Option will be equal to the quotient
determined by dividing the exercise price per share of Company Common Stock at
which such Company Stock Option was exercisable immediately prior to the
Effective Time by the Exchange Ratio, rounded up to the nearest whole cent. In
addition, each Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company or an
Affiliate and an employee of such entity shall be assumed by Parent, and the
number of shares subject to such Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement will be
adjusted as described above.
A-26
<PAGE>
(b) It is intended that Company Stock Options assumed by Parent shall
qualify following the Effective Time as incentive stock options as defined in
Section 422 of the Code to the extent Company Stock Options qualified as
incentive stock options immediately prior to the Effective Time and the
provisions of this Section 5.8 shall be applied consistent with such intent.
(c) Outstanding purchase rights under the ESPP shall be exercised upon the
earlier of January 29, 1999 or immediately prior to the Effective Time, provided
that if the Effective Time is later than January 31, 1999, then a new Purchase
Period (as defined in the ESPP) will commence on February 1, 1999 and will end
upon the earlier of July 31, 1999 or immediately prior to the Effective Time,
and each participant in the ESPP shall accordingly be issued shares of Company
Common Stock at that time pursuant to the terms of the ESPP and each share of
Company Common Stock so issued shall by virtue of the Merger, and without any
action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into the right to receive
the Common Stock of the Parent pursuant to Section 1.6(a).
(d) From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall grant all employees
credit for all service (to the same extent as service with Parent is taken into
account with respect to similarly situated employees of Parent) with Company
prior to the Effective Time for (i) eligibility and vesting purposes and (ii)
for purposes of vacation accrual after the Effective Time as if such service
with Company was service with Parent. Parent and Company agree that where
applicable with respect to any medical or dental benefit plan of Parent, Parent
shall, to the extent permitted under its plans, waive any pre-existing condition
exclusion and actively-at-work requirements (provided, however, that no such
waiver shall apply to a pre-existing condition of any employee of Company who
was, as of the Effective Time, excluded from participation in a plan by virtue
of such pre-existing condition).
(e) Any Company employee whose employment is involuntarily terminated
without cause within 90 days following the Effective Time will receive severance
benefits in accordance with the existing terms of the Company Officers Severance
Plan or Company Employee Severance Plan, to the extent such individual is
eligible under each such plan. In addition, any person who is a Company officer
on the date hereof whose employment is voluntarily terminated within ninety (90)
days following the Effective Time will receive severance benefits in accordance
with the existing terms of the Company Officers Severance Plan, to the extent
such officer is eligible under such plan.
5.9 FORM S-8. Parent agrees to file a registration statement on Form S-8
for the shares of Parent Common Stock issuable with respect to assumed Company
Stock Options as soon as is reasonably practicable after the Effective Time (but
in any event within five (5) business days of the Effective Time) and intends to
maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement thereafter for so long
as any of such options or other rights remain outstanding.
5.10 INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, Parent will cause the Surviving
Corporation to fulfill and honor in all respects the obligations of Company
pursuant to any indemnification agreements between Company and its present and
former directors and officers in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time
(the "Indemnified Parties") and any indemnification provisions under Company's
Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws as in effect on the date hereof. The
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation will
contain provisions with respect to exculpation and indemnification that are at
least as favorable to the Indemnified Parties as those contained in the
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Company as in effect on the date
hereof, which provisions will not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified for
a period of four years from the Effective Time in any manner that would
adversely affect the rights thereunder of individuals who, immediately prior to
the Effective Time, were directors, officers, employees or agents of Company,
unless such modification is required by law.
(b) For a period of four years after the Effective Time, Parent will cause
the Surviving Corporation to use its commercially reasonable efforts to maintain
in effect, if available, directors' and officers' liability insurance covering
those persons who are currently covered by Company's directors' and officers'
liability
A-27
<PAGE>
insurance policy on terms substantially similar to those applicable to the
current directors and officers of Company; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that in no event
will Parent or the Surviving Corporation be required to expend in excess of 150%
of the annual premium currently paid by Company for such coverage (or such
coverage as is available for such 150% of such annual premium).
(c) The provisions of this Section 5.10 are intended to be in addition to
the rights otherwise available to the Indemnified Parties by law, charter,
statute, bylaw, resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company or
agreement, and shall operate for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by,
each of the Indemnified Parties, their heirs and their representatives.
5.11 NASDAQ LISTING. Parent agrees to authorize for listing on Nasdaq the
shares of Parent Common Stock issuable, and those required to be reserved for
issuance, in connection with the Merger, upon official notice of issuance.
5.12 COMPANY AFFILIATE AGREEMENT. Set forth in the Company Disclosure
Letter is a list of those persons who may be deemed to be, in Company's
reasonable judgment, affiliates of Company within the meaning of Rule 145
promulgated under the Securities Act (each a "Company Affiliate"). Company will
provide Parent with such information and documents as Parent reasonably requests
for purposes of reviewing such list. Company will use its commercially
reasonable efforts to deliver or cause to be delivered to Parent, as promptly as
practicable on or following the date hereof, from each Company Affiliate an
executed affiliate agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as
EXHIBIT C (the "Company Affiliate Agreement"), each of which will be in full
force and effect as of the Effective Time. Parent will be entitled to place
appropriate legends on the certificates evidencing any Parent Common Stock to be
received by a Company Affiliate pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and to
issue appropriate stop transfer instructions to the transfer agent for the
Parent Common Stock, consistent with the terms of the Company Affiliate
Agreement.
5.13 REGULATORY FILINGS; REASONABLE EFFORTS. As soon as may be reasonably
practicable, Company and Parent each shall file with the United States Federal
Trade Commission (the "FTC") and the Antitrust Division of the United States
Department of Justice ("DOJ") Notification and Report Forms relating to the
transactions contemplated herein as required by the HSR Act, as well as
comparable pre-merger notification forms required by the merger notification or
control laws and regulations of any applicable jurisdiction, as agreed to by the
parties. Company and Parent each shall promptly (a) supply the other with any
information which may be required in order to effectuate such filings and (b)
supply any additional information which reasonably may be required by the FTC,
the DOJ or the competition or merger control authorities of any other
jurisdiction and which the parties may reasonably deem appropriate.
5.14 COMFORT LETTER. Prior to the Closing, Company shall cause Ernst &
Young LLP, certified public accountants to Company, to provide a letter
reasonably acceptable to Parent, relating to their audit of the financial
statements relating to Company contained in or incorporated by reference in the
Registration Statement.
5.15 COMPANY AUDIT; ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT. Company shall cause Ernst &
Young LLP, certified public accountants to the Company, by a target date of
November 15, 1998 but in no event later than November 30, 1998; (i) to complete,
and to communicate to Parent the results of, an audit of the Company's financial
statements (A) for each of the three calendar quarters of 1998 which have been
completed as of the date hereof (the "Quarterly Audit") and (B) as of and for
the nine-month period ending September 30, 1998 (the "Nine-Month Audit"); and
(ii) to provide, upon request, an accountants' consent for the inclusion, in the
Proxy Statement/Prospectus, of audit report(s) for the periods required to be
included in such Proxy Statement/Prospectus as well as for the nine-month period
ending September 30, 1998 (irrespective of whether an audit for such period is
required under SEC rules) (the "Accountants' Consent"). The inclusion of a going
concern qualification in the Nine-Month Audit or any Quarterly Audit shall not
be deemed to result in a breach of the covenant set forth in this Section 5.15.
A-28
<PAGE>
5.16 NO RIGHTS PLAN AMENDMENT. Except as required by Section 6.3(e), prior
to the Closing, Company shall not amend or modify the Company Rights Plan in any
manner or take another action so as to (i) render the Company Rights Plan
inapplicable to any transaction(s) other than the Merger and other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, the Company Stock Option Agreement, the Company
Affiliate Agreements and the Company Voting Agreements, or (ii) permit any
person or group who would otherwise be an Acquiring Person (as defined in the
Company Rights Plan) not to be an Acquiring Person, or (iii) provide that a
Distribution Date, a Section II(a)(ii) Trigger Date or a Shares Acquisition Date
(as such terms are defined in the Company Rights Plan) or similar event does not
occur by reason of the execution of any agreement or transaction other than this
Agreement and the Merger and the agreements and transactions contemplated hereby
and thereby, or (iv) except as specifically contemplated by this Agreement,
otherwise affect the rights of holders of Company Rights.
5.17 NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENTS. The Company will encourage the persons set
forth on Exhibit D-1 hereto to enter into Noncompetition Agreements
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D-2.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
6.1 CONDITIONS TO OBLIGATIONS OF EACH PARTY TO EFFECT THE MERGER. The
respective obligations of each party to this Agreement to effect the Merger
shall be subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the Closing Date of the
following conditions:
(a) COMPANY STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL. This Agreement shall have been approved
and adopted, and the Merger shall have been duly approved, by the requisite vote
under applicable law, by the stockholders of Company.
(b) REGISTRATION STATEMENT EFFECTIVE; PROXY STATEMENT. The SEC shall have
declared the Registration Statement effective. No stop order suspending the
effectiveness of the Registration Statement or any part thereof shall have been
issued and no proceeding for that purpose, and no similar proceeding in respect
of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, shall have been initiated or threatened in
writing by the SEC.
(c) NO ORDER; HSR ACT. No Governmental Entity shall have enacted, issued,
promulgated, enforced or entered any statute, rule, regulation, executive order,
decree, injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent)
which is in effect and which has the effect of making the Merger illegal or
otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Merger. All waiting periods, if any,
under the HSR Act relating to the transactions contemplated hereby will have
expired or terminated early and all material foreign antitrust approvals
required to be obtained prior to the Merger in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby shall have been obtained.
(d) TAX OPINIONS. Parent and Company shall each have received written
opinions from their respective tax counsel (Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation, and Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villenueve Franklin &
Hachigan, LLP, respectively), in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to
them, to the effect that the Merger will constitute a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and such opinions shall not have been
withdrawn; provided, however, that if the counsel to either Parent or Company
does not render such opinion, this condition shall nonetheless be deemed to be
satisfied with respect to such party if counsel to the other party renders such
opinion to such party. The parties to this Agreement agree to make such
reasonable representations as requested by such counsel for the purpose of
rendering such opinions.
(e) NASDAQ LISTING. The shares of Parent Common Stock issuable to
stockholders of Company pursuant to this Agreement and such other shares
required to be reserved for issuance in connection with the Merger shall have
been authorized for listing on Nasdaq upon official notice of issuance.
A-29
<PAGE>
6.2 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS TO OBLIGATIONS OF COMPANY. The obligation of
Company to consummate and effect the Merger shall be subject to the satisfaction
at or prior to the Closing Date of each of the following conditions, any of
which may be waived, in writing, exclusively by Company:
(a) REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. Each representation and warranty of
Parent and Merger Sub contained in this Agreement (i) shall have been true and
correct as of the date of this Agreement and (ii) shall be true and correct on
and as of the Closing Date with the same force and effect as if made on the
Closing Date except, (A) in each case, or in the aggregate, as does not
constitute a Material Adverse Effect on Parent and Merger Sub, (B) for changes
contemplated by this Agreement and (C) for those representations and warranties
which address matters only as of a particular date (which representations shall
have been true and correct except as does not constitute a Material Adverse
Effect on Parent and Merger Sub as of such particular date) (it being understood
that, for purposes of determining the accuracy of such representations and
warranties, (i) all "Material Adverse Effect" qualifications and other
qualifications based on the word "material" or similar phrases contained in such
representations and warranties shall be disregarded and (ii) any update of or
modification to the Parent Disclosure Letter made or purported to have been made
after the date of this Agreement shall be disregarded). Company shall have
received a certificate with respect to the foregoing signed on behalf of Parent
by an authorized officer of Parent.
(b) AGREEMENTS AND COVENANTS. Parent and Merger Sub shall have performed
or complied in all material respects with all agreements and covenants required
by this Agreement to be performed or complied with by them on or prior to the
Closing Date, and Company shall have received a certificate to such effect
signed on behalf of Parent by an authorized officer of Parent.
(c) MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT. No Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Parent shall have occurred since the date of this Agreement.
6.3 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB. The
obligations of Parent and Merger Sub to consummate and effect the Merger shall
be subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the Closing Date of each of the
following conditions, any of which may be waived, in writing, exclusively by
Parent:
(a) REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. Each representation and warranty of
Company contained in this Agreement (i) shall have been true and correct as of
the date of this Agreement and (ii) shall be true and correct on and as of the
Closing Date with the same force and effect as if made on and as of the Closing
Date except (A) in each case, or in the aggregate, as does not constitute a
Material Adverse Effect on Company (B) for changes contemplated by this
Agreement and (C) for those representations and warranties which address matters
only as of a particular date (which representations shall have been true and
correct except as does not constitute a Material Adverse Effect on Company as of
such particular date) (it being understood that, for purposes of determining the
accuracy of such representations and warranties, (i) all "Material Adverse
Effect" qualifications and other qualifications based on the word "material" or
similar phrases contained in such representations and warranties shall be
disregarded and (ii) any update of or modification to the Company Disclosure
Letter made or purported to have been made after the date of this Agreement
shall be disregarded). Parent shall have received a certificate with respect to
the foregoing signed on behalf of Company by an authorized officer of Company.
(b) AGREEMENTS AND COVENANTS. Company shall have performed or complied in
all material respects with all agreements and covenants required by this
Agreement to be performed or complied with by it at or prior to the Closing
Date, and Parent shall have received a certificate to such effect signed on
behalf of Company by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of Company.
(c) MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT. No Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Company and its subsidiaries shall have occurred since the date of this
Agreement.
(d) AFFILIATE AGREEMENTS. Each of the Company Affiliates shall have
entered into the Company Affiliate Agreement and each of such agreements will be
in full force and effect as of the Effective Time.
A-30
<PAGE>
(e) COMPANY RIGHTS PLANS. All actions necessary to extinguish and cancel
all outstanding Rights under the Company Rights Plan or render such rights
inapplicable to the Merger shall have been taken.
(f) COMPANY AUDIT. (i) On or before November 30, 1998, the Quarterly Audit
and the Nine-Month Audit shall have been completed by Ernst & Young LLP and the
results of such audits shall have been communicated to Parent; and (ii) the
revenues and other financial results of the Quarterly Audit for each of the
three calendar quarters included in such audit shall not be materially different
from the revenues and other financial results disclosed by the Company for each
of such three calendar quarters in the Form 10-Q filed by the Company with
respect to each such quarter; and (iii) if requested, Ernst & Young LLP shall
have provided the Accountants' Consent on or before November 30, 1998.
(g) NO ADJUSTMENT TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. No material restatement or
adjustment shall have occurred or been made to any audited financial statements
of the Company which were contained in any Company SEC Reports filed by the
Company on or before the date hereof.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
7.1 TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
Effective Time, whether before or after the requisite approvals of the
stockholders of Company or Parent:
(a) by mutual written consent duly authorized by the Boards of Directors of
Parent and Company;
(b) by either Company or Parent if the Merger shall not have been
consummated by April 30, 1999 for any reason; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the right
to terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.1(b) shall ont be available to
any party whose action or failure to act has been a principal cause of or
resulted in the failure of the Merger to occur on or before such date and such
action or failure to act constitutes a breach of this Agreement;
(c) by either Company or Parent if a Governmental Entity shall have issued
an order, decree or ruling or taken any other action, in any case having the
effect of permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the
Merger, which order, decree, ruling or other action is final and nonappealable;
(d) by either Company or Parent if the required approval of the stockholders
of Company contemplated by this Agreement shall not have been obtained by reason
of the failure to obtain the required vote at a meeting of Company stockholders
duly convened therefor or at any adjournment thereof (PROVIDED that the right to
terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.1(d) shall not be available to
Company where the failure to obtain Company stockholder approval shall have been
caused by the action or failure to act of Company and such action or failure to
act constitutes a breach by Company of this Agreement);
(e) by Parent if a Triggering Event (as defined below) shall have occurred;
(f) by Parent (at any time prior to the adoption and approval of this
Agreement and the Merger by the required vote of the stockholders of Company) if
a Termination Event (as defined below) shall have occurred;
(g) by Company, upon a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement on the part of Parent set forth in this Agreement, or if any
representation or warranty of Parent shall have become untrue, in either case
such that the conditions set forth in Section 6.2(a) or Section 6.2(b) would not
be satisfied as of the time of such breach or as of the time such representation
or warranty shall have become untrue, PROVIDED that if such inaccuracy in
Parent's representations and warranties or breach by Parent is curable by Parent
through the exercise of its commercially reasonable efforts, then Company may
not terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.1(g) for thirty days after
delivery of written notice from Company to Parent of such breach, provided
Parent continues to exercise commercially reasonable efforts to cure such breach
(it being understood that Company may not terminate this Agreement pursuant to
this
A-31
<PAGE>
paragraph (g) if it shall have materially breached this Agreement or if such
breach by Parent is cured during such thirty day period); or
(h) by Parent, upon a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement on the part of Company set forth in this Agreement, or if any
representation or warranty of Company shall have become untrue, in either case
such that the conditions set forth in Section 6.3(a) or Section 6.3(b) would not
be satisfied as of the time of such breach or as of the time such representation
or warranty shall have become untrue, PROVIDED, that if such inaccuracy in
Company's representations and warranties or breach by Company is curable by
Company through the exercise of its commercially reasonable efforts, then Parent
may not terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.1(h) for thirty days after
delivery of written notice from Parent to Company of such breach, provided
Company continues to exercise commercially reasonable efforts to cure such
breach (it being understood that Parent may not terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this paragraph (h) if it shall have materially breached this
Agreement or if such breach by Company is cured during such thirty day period).
For the purposes of this Agreement, a "Termination Event" shall be deemed to
occur if Company shall not have used commercially reasonable efforts to hold the
Company Stockholders' Meeting as promptly as practicable and in any event within
forty-five (45) days after the Registration Statement is declared effective
under the Securities Act.
For the purposes of this Agreement, a "Triggering Event" shall be deemed to
have occurred if: (i) the Board of Directors of Company or any committee thereof
shall for any reason have withdrawn or shall have amended or modified in a
manner adverse to Parent its unanimous recommendation in favor of, the adoption
and approval of the Agreement or the approval of the Merger; (ii) Company shall
have failed to include in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus the unanimous
recommendation of the Board of Directors of Company in favor of the adoption and
approval of the Agreement and the approval of the Merger; (iii) Board of
Directors of Company fails to reaffirm its unanimous recommendation in favor of
the adoption and approval of the Agreement and the approval of the Merger within
seven (7) business days after Parent requests in writing that such
recommendation be reaffirmed at any time following the public announcement of an
Acquisition Proposal; (iv) the Board of Directors of Company or any committee
thereof shall have approved or publicly recommended any Acquisition Proposal;
(v) Company shall have entered into any letter of intent of similar document or
any agreement, contract or commitment accepting any Acquisition Proposal; or
(vi) a tender or exchange offer relating to securities of Company shall have
been commenced by a Person unaffiliated with Parent and Company shall not have
sent to its securityholders pursuant to Rule 14e-2 promulgated under the
Securities Act, within ten (10) business days after such tender or exchange
offer is first published sent or given, a statement disclosing that Company
recommends rejection of such tender or exchange offer.
7.2 NOTICE OF TERMINATION; EFFECT OF TERMINATION. Any termination of this
Agreement under Section 7.1 above will be effective immediately upon the
delivery of written notice of the terminating party to the other parties hereto.
In the event of the termination of this Agreement as provided in Section 7.1,
this Agreement shall be of no further force or effect, except (i) as set forth
in this Section 7.2, Section 7.3 and Article 8 (miscellaneous), each of which
shall survive the termination of this Agreement, and (ii) nothing herein shall
relieve any party from liability for any willful breach of this Agreement. No
termination of this Agreement shall affect the obligations of the parties
contained in the Confidentiality Agreement, all of which obligations shall
survive termination of this Agreement in accordance with their terms.
7.3 FEES AND EXPENSES. Except as set forth in this Section 7.3, all fees
and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses whether
or not the Merger is consummated; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that Parent and Company
shall share equally all fees and expenses, other than attorneys' and accountants
fees and expenses, incurred in relation to the printing and filing (with the
SEC) of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus
A-32
<PAGE>
(including any preliminary materials related thereto) and the Registration
Statement (including financial statements and exhibits) and any amendments or
supplements thereto.
7.4 AMENDMENT. Subject to applicable law, this Agreement may be amended by
the parties hereto at any time by execution of an instrument in writing signed
on behalf of each of Parent and Company.
7.5 EXTENSION; WAIVER. At any time prior to the Effective Time any party
hereto may, to the extent legally allowed, (i) extend the time for the
performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other parties hereto,
(ii) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties made to such
party contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto and (iii)
waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions for the benefit of
such party contained herein. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any
such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in
writing signed on behalf of such party. Delay in exercising any right under this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
8.1 NON-SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. The representations
and warranties of Company, Parent and Merger Sub contained in this Agreement
shall terminate at the Effective Time, and only the covenants that by their
terms survive the Effective Time shall survive the Effective Time.
8.2 NOTICES. All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be deemed given if delivered personally or by commercial
delivery service, or sent via telecopy (receipt confirmed) to the parties at the
following addresses or telecopy numbers (or at such other address or telecopy
numbers for a party as shall be specified by like notice):
(a) if to Parent or Merger Sub, to:
Informix Corporation
4100 Bohannon Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Attention: Gary Lloyd, Vice President, General Counsel
Telephone No.: (650) 926-6300
Telecopy No.: (650) 926-6562
with a copy to:
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304-1050
Attention: Martin W. Korman, Esq./Jeffrey A. Herbst, Esq.
Telephone No.: (650) 493-9300
Telecopy No.: (650) 493-6811
(b) if to Company, to:
Red Brick Systems, Inc.
485 Alberto Way
Los Gatos, CA 95032
Attention: Chris Erickson, President
Telephone No.: (408) 399-3200
Telecopy No.: (408) 399-7264
A-33
<PAGE>
with a copy to:
Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villenueve
Franklin & Hachigan, LLP
155 Constitution Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Attention: Daniel E. O'Connor, Esq.
Telephone No.: (650) 321-2400
Telecopy No.: (650) 321-2800
8.3 INTERPRETATION; KNOWLEDGE.
(a) When a reference is made in this Agreement to Exhibits, such reference
shall be to an Exhibit to this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. When a
reference is made in this Agreement to Sections, such reference shall be to a
Section of this Agreement. Unless otherwise indicated the words "include,"
"includes" and "including" when used herein shall be deemed in each case to be
followed by the words "without limitation." The table of contents and headings
contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect
in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. When reference is
made herein to "the business of" an entity, such reference shall be deemed to
include the business of all direct and indirect subsidiaries of such entity.
Reference to the subsidiaries of an entity shall be deemed to include all direct
and indirect subsidiaries of such entity.
(b) For purposes of this Agreement the term "knowledge" means with respect
to a party hereto, with respect to any matter in question, that any of the Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel or Controller of
such party, has actual knowledge of such matter.
(c) For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Material Adverse Effect" when
used in connection with an entity means any change, event, violation,
inaccuracy, circumstance or effect that is materially adverse to the business,
assets (including intangible assets), capitalization, financial condition or
results of operations of such entity and its parent (if applicable) or
subsidiaries taken as a whole; provided, however, that the following shall not
be considered a "Material Adverse Effect": (i) changes, events, violations,
inaccuracies, circumstances and effects that are caused by conditions affecting
the United States economy as a whole or affecting the industry in which such
entity completes as a whole, which conditions do not affect such entity in a
disproportionate manner, (ii) a shortfall in revenues of such entity as a result
of delays in customer orders (including any effects on such entity's operating
income which result directly from such revenue shortfall), which delays result
from the announcement and pendency of the Merger, or (iii) the loss of employees
resulting from the announcement and pendency of the Merger.
(d) For purposes of this Agreement, the term "person" shall mean any
individual, corporation (including any non-profit corporation), general
partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, joint venture,
estate, trust, company (including any limited liability company or joint stock
company), firm or other enterprise, association, organization, entity or
Governmental Entity.
(e) For purposes of this Agreement, the term "subsidiary" or "subsidiaries"
shall not include Red Brick Australasia Pty Ltd.
8.4 COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of
the parties and delivered to the other party, it being understood that all
parties need not sign the same counterpart.
8.5 ENTIRE AGREEMENT; THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and the
documents and instruments and other agreements among the parties hereto as
contemplated by or referred to herein, including the Company Disclosure Letter
and the Parent Disclosure Letter (a) constitute the entire agreement among the
parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior
agreements and
A-34
<PAGE>
understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof, it being understood that the Confidentiality Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect until the Closing and shall survive any
termination of this Agreement; and (b) are not intended to confer upon any other
person any rights or remedies hereunder, except as specifically provided in
Section 5.10.
8.6 SEVERABILITY. In the event that any provision of this Agreement or the
application thereof, becomes or is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be illegal, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement will
continue in full force and effect and the application of such provision to other
persons or circumstances will be interpreted so as reasonably to effect the
intent of the parties hereto. The parties further agree to replace such void or
unenforceable provision of this Agreement with a valid and enforceable provision
that will achieve, to the extent possible, the economic, business and other
purposes of such void or unenforceable provision.
8.7 OTHER REMEDIES; SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Except as otherwise provided
herein, any and all remedies herein expressly conferred upon a party will be
deemed cumulative with and not exclusive of any other remedy conferred hereby,
or by law or equity upon such party, and the exercise by a party of any one
remedy will not preclude the exercise of any other remedy. The parties hereto
agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the
provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their
specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the
parties shall be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions
hereof in any court of the United States or any state having jurisdiction, this
being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in
equity.
8.8 GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, regardless of the laws that
might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of law thereof;
provided that issues involving the corporate governance of any of the parties
hereto shall be governed by their respective jurisdictions of incorporation.
Each of the parties hereto irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of
any state or federal court within the Northern District of California, in
connection with any matter based upon or arising out of this Agreement or the
matters contemplated herein, other than issues involving the corporate
governance of any of the parties hereto, agrees that process may be served upon
them in any manner authorized by the laws of the State of California for such
persons and waives and covenants not to assert or plead any objection which they
might otherwise have to such jurisdiction and such process.
8.9 RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. The parties hereto agree that they have been
represented by counsel during the negotiation and execution of this Agreement
and, therefore, waive the application of any law, regulation, holding or rule of
construction providing that ambiguities in an agreement or other document will
be construed against the party drafting such agreement or document.
8.10 ASSIGNMENT. No party may assign either this Agreement or any of its
rights, interests, or obligations hereunder without the prior written approval
of the other parties. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall be
binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their
respective successors and permitted assigns.
8.11 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF PARENT, COMPANY AND MERGER SUB HEREBY
IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR
COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE ACTIONS OF PARENT, COMPANY OR MERGER SUB IN
THE NEGOTIATION, ADMINISTRATION, PERFORMANCE AND ENFORCEMENT HEREOF.
*****
A-35
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized respective officers as of the date first
written above.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
By: /s/ ROBERT J. FINOCCHIO, JR.
-----------------------------------------
Name: Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.
Title: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
IC MERGER CORPORATION
By: /s/ ROBERT J. FINOCCHIO, JR.
-----------------------------------------
Name: Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.
Title: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER G. ERICKSON
-----------------------------------------
Name: Christopher G. Erickson
Title: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
</TABLE>
**** MERGER AGREEMENT ****
A-36
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT A TO MERGER AGREEMENT
Form of Voting Agreement
<PAGE>
VOTING AGREEMENT
This Voting Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of October
7, 1998, between Informix Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), and
the undersigned stockholder ("Stockholder") of Red Brick Systems, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company").
RECITALS
A. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Parent, Company and IC
Merger Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent ("Merger Sub"), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization
of even date herewith (the "Merger Agreement") which provides for the merger
(the "Merger") of Merger Sub with and into the Company. Pursuant to the Merger,
shares of Common Stock of the Company will be converted into Common Stock of
Parent on the basis described in the Merger Agreement.
B. The Stockholder is the record holder and beneficial owner (as defined in
Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act")) of such number of shares of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company
as is indicated on the final page of this Agreement (the "Shares").
C. Parent desires the Stockholder to agree, and the Stockholder is willing
to agree, not to transfer or otherwise dispose of any of the Shares, or any
other shares of capital stock of the Company acquired hereafter and prior to the
Expiration Date (as defined in Section 1.1 below, except as otherwise permitted
hereby), and to vote the Shares and any other such shares of capital stock of
the Company so as to facilitate consummation of the Merger.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, promises and
representations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. AGREEMENT TO RETAIN SHARES.
1.1 TRANSFER AND ENCUMBRANCE. Stockholder agrees not to transfer (except
as may be specifically required by court order), sell, exchange, pledge or
otherwise dispose of or encumber any of the Shares or any New Shares as defined
in Section 1.2 below, or to make any offer or agreement relating thereto, at any
time prior to the Expiration Date. As used herein, the term "Expiration Date"
shall mean the earlier to occur of (i) such date and time as the Merger shall
become effective in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Merger
Agreement and (ii) such date as the Merger Agreement shall be terminated
pursuant to Article VII thereof.
1.2 ADDITIONAL PURCHASES. Stockholder agrees that any shares of capital
stock of the Company that Stockholder purchases or with respect to which
Stockholder otherwise acquires beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in
Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) after the execution of this Agreement and
prior to the Expiration Date ("New Shares") shall be subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement to the same extent as if they constituted Shares.
2. AGREEMENT TO VOTE SHARES. At every meeting of the stockholders of the
Company called with respect to any of the following, and at every adjournment
thereof, and on every action or approval by written consent of the Stockholders
of the Company with respect to any of the following, Stockholder shall vote the
Shares and any New Shares: (i) in favor of approval of the Merger Agreement and
the Merger and any matter that could reasonably be expected to facilitate the
Merger; and (ii) against approval of any proposal made in opposition to or
competition with consummation of the Merger and against any merger,
consolidation, sale of assets, reorganization or recapitalization, with any
party other than with Parent and its affiliates and against any liquidation or
winding up of the Company (each of the foregoing is hereinafter referred to as
an "Opposing Proposal"). Stockholder agrees not to take any actions contrary to
Stockholder's obligations under this Agreement.
A-A-1
<PAGE>
3. IRREVOCABLE PROXY. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement,
Stockholder agrees to deliver to Parent a proxy in the form attached hereto as
EXHIBIT A (the "Proxy"), which shall be irrevocable, with the total number of
shares of capital stock of the Company beneficially owned (as such term is
defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) by Stockholder set forth therein.
4. REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS OF THE
STOCKHOLDER. Stockholder hereby represents, warrants and covenants to Parent as
follows:
4.1 OWNERSHIP OF SHARES. Stockholder (i) is the beneficial owner of the
Shares, which at the date hereof and at all times up until the Expiration Date
will be free and clear of any liens, claims, options, charges or other
encumbrances; (ii) does not beneficially own any shares of capital stock of the
Company other than the Shares (excluding shares as to which Stockholder
currently disclaims beneficial ownership in accordance with applicable law); and
(iii) has full power and authority to make, enter into and carry out the terms
of this Agreement and the Proxy.
4.2 NO PROXY SOLICITATIONS. Stockholder will not, and will not permit any
entity under Stockholder's control to: (i) solicit proxies or become a
"participant" in a "solicitation" (as such terms are defined in Regulation 14A
under the Exchange Act) with respect to an Opposing Proposal or otherwise
encourage or assist any party in taking or planning any action that would
compete with, restrain or otherwise serve to interfere with or inhibit the
timely consummation of the Merger in accordance with the terms of the Merger
Agreement; (ii) initiate a Stockholders' vote or action by consent of the
Company Stockholders with respect to an Opposing Proposal; or (iii) become a
member of a "group" (as such term is used in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act)
with respect to any voting securities of the Company with respect to an Opposing
Proposal. This provision shall not in any manner limit the Company's ability
through its officers and directors to take action specifically permitted by the
provisions of Section of the Merger Agreement.
5. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. Stockholder hereby covenants and agrees to
execute and deliver any additional documents necessary or desirable, in the
reasonable opinion of Parent and Stockholder, as the case may be, to carry out
the intent of this Agreement.
6. CONSENT AND WAIVER. Stockholder hereby gives any consents or waivers
that are reasonably required for the consummation of the Merger under the terms
of any agreements to which Stockholder is a party or pursuant to any rights
Stockholder may have.
7. TERMINATION. This Agreement and the Proxy delivered in connection
herewith shall terminate and shall have no further force or effect as of the
Expiration Date.
8. MISCELLANEOUS.
8.1 SEVERABILITY. If any term, provision, covenant or restriction of this
Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or
unenforceable, then the remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and
restrictions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall
in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated.
8.2 BINDING EFFECT AND ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement and all of the
provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns, but, except as
otherwise specifically provided herein, either this Agreement nor any of the
rights, interests or obligations of the parties hereto may be assigned by either
of the parties without prior written consent of the other.
8.3 AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATION. This Agreement may not be modified,
amended, altered or supplemented except upon the execution and delivery of a
written agreement executed by the parties hereto.
8.4 SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE; INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. The parties hereto
acknowledge that Parent will be irreparably harmed and that there will be no
adequate remedy at law for a violation of any of the covenants
A-A-2
<PAGE>
or agreement of Stockholder set forth herein. Therefore, it is agreed that, in
addition to any other remedies that may be available to Parent upon any such
violation, Parent shall have the right to enforce such covenants and agreements
by specific performance, injunctive relief or by any other means available to
Parent at law or in equity.
8.5 NOTICES. All notices, requests, claims, demands and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and sufficient if delivered in
person, by cable, telegram or telex, or sent by mail (registered or certified
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested) or overnight courier (prepaid)
to the respective parties as follows:
If to Parent:
Informix Corporation
4100 Bohannon Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Attn: General Counsel
With a copy to:
Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Attn: Martin W. Korman, Esq.
Jeffrey A. Herbst, Esq.
If to the Stockholder:
At the address provided by Stockholder to Parent in writing
With a copy to:
Gunderson Dettmer
155 Constitution Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Attn: Daniel E. O'Connor, Esq.
or to such other address as any party may have furnished to the other in
writing in accordance herewith, except that notices of change of address shall
only be effective upon receipt.
8.6 GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and
enforced in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of California.
8.7 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of
the parties in respect of the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior
negotiations and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject
matter.
8.8 COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts,
each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same agreement.
8.9 EFFECT OF HEADINGS. The section headings herein are for convenience
only and shall not affect the construction of interpretation of this Agreement.
A-A-3
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Voting Agreement to be duly
executed on the date and year first above written.
INFORMIX CORPORATION
By:
-----------------------------------
Name: Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.
Title: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
STOCKHOLDER
--------------------------------------
Name:
Stockholder's Address for Notice:
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Shares beneficially owned:
shares of Common Stock
***VOTING AGREEMENT***
A-A-4
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT A
IRREVOCABLE PROXY
The undersigned Stockholder of Red Brick Systems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Company"), hereby irrevocably appoints the directors on the Board
of Directors of Informix Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), and
each of them, as the sole and exclusive attorneys and proxies of the
undersigned, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to the full
extent of the undersigned's rights with respect to the shares of capital stock
of Company beneficially owned by the undersigned, which shares are listed on the
final page of this Proxy (the "Shares"), and any and all other shares or
securities issued or issuable in respect thereof on or after the date hereof,
until such time as that certain Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of
October 7, 1998 (the "Merger Agreement"), among Parent, IC Merger Corporation, a
Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and
Company, shall be terminated in accordance with its terms or the Merger (as
defined in the Merger Agreement) is effective. Upon the execution hereof, all
prior proxies given by the undersigned with respect to the Shares and any and
all other shares or securities issued or issuable in respect thereof on or after
the date hereof are hereby revoked and no subsequent proxies will be given.
This proxy is irrevocable, is granted pursuant to the Voting Agreement dated
as of October 7, 1998 between Parent and the undersigned Stockholder (the
"Voting Agreement"), and is granted in consideration of Parent entering into the
Merger Agreement. The attorneys and proxies named above will be empowered at any
time prior to termination of the Merger Agreement to exercise all voting and
other rights (including, without limitation, the power to execute and deliver
written consents with respect to the Shares) of the undersigned at every annual,
special or adjourned meeting of Company stockholders, and in every written
consent in lieu of such a meeting, or otherwise, in favor of approval of the
Merger and the Merger Agreement and any matter that could reasonably be expected
to facilitate the Merger, and against any proposal made in opposition to or
competition with the consummation of the Merger and against any merger,
consolidation, sale of assets, reorganization or recapitalization of Company
with any party other than Parent and its affiliates and against any liquidation
or winding up of Company.
The attorneys and proxies named above may only exercise this proxy to vote
the Shares subject hereto at any time prior to termination of the Merger
Agreement at every annual, special or adjourned meeting of the Stockholders of
Company and in every written consent in lieu of such meeting, in favor of
approval of the Merger and the Merger Agreement and any matter that could
reasonably be expected to facilitate the Merger, and against any merger,
consolidation, sale of assets, reorganization or recapitalization of Company
with any party other than Parent and its affiliates, and against any liquidation
or winding up of Company, and may not exercise this proxy on any other matter.
The undersigned Stockholder may vote the Shares on all other matters.
Any obligation of the undersigned hereunder shall be binding upon the
successors and assigns of the undersigned.
This proxy is irrevocable.
Dated: October 7, 1998
Signature of Stockholder: __________________________________________________
Print Name of Stockholder: _________________________________________________
Shares beneficially owned:
____________________________ shares of Common Stock
A-A-5
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT B TO MERGER AGREEMENT
Form of Stock Option Agreement
<PAGE>
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
THIS STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT dated as of October 7, 1998 (the "AGREEMENT") is
entered into by and between Red Brick Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("RED BRICK") and Informix Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("INFORMIX").
Capitalized terms used in this Agreement but not defined herein shall have the
meanings ascribed thereto in the Merger Agreement (as defined below).
RECITALS
A. Concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, Red
Brick, Informix and IC Merger Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly
owned subsidiary of Informix ("SUB"), are entering into an Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization (the "MERGER AGREEMENT"), which provides that, among other
things, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Red Brick and
Informix will enter into a business combination transaction (the "MERGER").
B. As a condition to Informix's willingness to enter into the Merger
Agreement, Informix has requested that Red Brick agree, and Red Brick has so
agreed, to grant to Informix an option to acquire shares of Red Brick's Common
Stock, $0.0001 par value, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
herein.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
covenants and agreements set forth herein and in the Merger Agreement and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. GRANT OF OPTION
Red Brick hereby grants to Informix an irrevocable option (the "OPTION") to
acquire up to a number of shares of the Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, of Red
Brick ("RED BRICK SHARES"), including the associated rights (the "Rights") to
purchase shares of Red Brick Preferred Stock pursuant to the Rights Agreement,
dated as of July 21, 1997, between Red Brick and Harris Trust and Savings Bank,
as Rights Agent (the "Rights Agreement"), equal to 19.9% of the issued and
outstanding shares of capital stock of Red Brick as of the first date, if any,
upon which an Exercise Event (as defined in Section 2(a) below) shall occur (the
"OPTION SHARES"), in the manner set forth below by paying cash at a price of
$2.40 per share (the "EXERCISE PRICE"). All references in this Agreement to Red
Brick Shares issued to Informix hereunder shall be deemed to include the Rights
(subject to the terms of the Rights Agreement).
2. EXERCISE OF OPTION; MAXIMUM PROCEEDS
(a) For all purposes of this Agreement, an "EXERCISE EVENT" shall have
occurred (i) immediately prior to the earlier of (x) the consummation of, or (y)
the record date, if any, for a meeting of Red Brick's stockholders with regard
to, an Acquisition Proposal for an Acquisition Transaction with respect to Red
Brick with any party other than Informix (or an affiliate of Informix), (ii)
immediately prior to the effectiveness of a Change of Control (as defined below)
of the Red Brick Board of Directors as a result of an election contest within
the meaning of Rule 14a-11 of the Exchange Act; or (iii) upon termination of the
Merger Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(b), (e) or (f). For purposes of this
Agreement, a "Change of Control" of the Red Brick Board of Directors shall mean
a change in the composition of such Board as a result of which fewer than a
majority of the incumbent directors are directors who either (A) had been
directors of Red Brick at least eighteen (18) months prior to such change or (B)
were elected or nominated for election to the Red Brick Board with the
affirmative votes of at least a majority of the directors who had been directors
of Red Brick at least eighteen (18) months prior to such change and who were
still serving as directors at the time of the election or nomination.
(b) Informix may deliver to Red Brick a written notice (an "EXERCISE
NOTICE") specifying that it wishes to exercise and close a purchase of Option
Shares upon the occurrence of an Exercise Event and
A-B-1
<PAGE>
specifying the total number of Option Shares it wishes to acquire (i) upon
public disclosure of an Acquisition Proposal for an Acquisition Transaction with
respect to Red Brick, with any party other than Informix (or an affiliate of
Informix) (ii) upon the commencement of an election contest within the meaning
of Rule 14a-11 of the Exchange Act with the purpose of seeking to effect a
Change of Control of the Red Brick Board of Directors, or (iii) upon termination
of the Merger Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(b), (e) or (f) (the events
specified in clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) of this sentence being referred to
herein as "CONDITIONAL EXERCISE EVENTS"). At any time after delivery of an
Exercise Notice, unless such Exercise Notice is withdrawn by Informix, the
closing of a purchase of Option Shares (a "CLOSING") specified in such Exercise
Notice shall take place at the principal offices of Red Brick upon the
occurrence of an Exercise Event or at such later date prior to the termination
of the Option as may be designated by Informix in writing. In the event that no
Exercise Event shall occur prior to termination of the Option, such Exercise
Notice shall be void and of no further force and effect.
(c) The Option shall terminate upon the earliest of (i) the Effective Time,
(ii) 12 months following the termination of the Merger Agreement; PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, that if the Option is exercisable but cannot be exercised by reason of
any applicable government order or because the waiting period related to the
issuance of the Option Shares under the HSR Act shall not have expired or been
terminated, or because any other condition to closing has not been satisfied,
then the Option shall not terminate until the tenth business day after such
impediment to exercise shall have been removed or shall have become final and
not subject to appeal.
(d) If Informix receives proceeds in connection with any sales or other
dispositions of Option Shares, plus any dividends received by Informix declared
on Option Shares (including by exercising the Informix Put described in Section
6(a) hereof), of more than the sum of (x) $2,000,000 plus (y) the Exercise Price
multiplied by the number of Red Brick Shares purchased by Informix pursuant to
the Option, then all proceeds to Informix in excess of such sum shall be
remitted by Informix to Red Brick.
3. CONDITIONS TO CLOSING
The obligation of Red Brick to issue Option Shares to Informix hereunder is
subject to the conditions that (a) any waiting period under the HSR Act
applicable to the issuance of the Option Shares hereunder shall have expired or
been terminated; (b) all material consents, approvals, orders or authorizations
of, or registrations, declarations or filings with, any Federal, state or local
administrative agency or commission or other Federal state or local governmental
authority or instrumentality, if any, required in connection with the issuance
of the Option Shares hereunder shall have been obtained or made, as the case may
be; and (c) no preliminary or permanent injunction or other order by any court
of competent jurisdiction prohibiting or otherwise restraining such issuance
shall be in effect. It is understood and agreed that at any time during which
Informix shall be entitled to deliver to Red Brick an Exercise Notice, the
parties will use their respective best efforts to satisfy all conditions to
Closing, so that a Closing may take place as promptly as practicable, and in any
event, upon the occurrence of an Exercise Event.
4. CLOSING
At any Closing, (a) Red Brick shall deliver to Informix a single certificate
in definitive form representing the number of Red Brick Shares designated by
Informix in its Exercise Notice consistent with this Agreement, such certificate
to be registered in the name of Informix and to bear the legend set forth in
Section 10 hereof, against delivery of (b) payment by Informix to Red Brick of
the aggregate purchase price for the Red Brick Shares so designated and being
purchased by delivery of a certified check or bank check in immediately
available funds.
5. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF RED BRICK
Red Brick represents and warrants to Informix that (a) Red Brick is a
corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws
of the State of Delaware and has the corporate power and authority to enter into
this Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder; (b) the execution
A-B-2
<PAGE>
and delivery of this Agreement by Red Brick and consummation by Red Brick of the
transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of Red Brick and no other corporate proceedings on
the part of Red Brick are necessary to authorize this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated hereby; (c) this Agreement has been duly executed and
delivered by Red Brick and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of
Red Brick and, assuming this Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding
obligation of Informix, is enforceable against Red Brick in accordance with its
terms; (d) except for any filings required under the HSR Act, Red Brick has
taken all necessary corporate and other action to authorize and reserve for
issuance and to permit it to issue upon exercise of the Option, and at all times
from the date hereof until the termination of the Option will have reserved for
issuance, a sufficient number of unissued Red Brick Shares for Informix to
exercise the Option in full and will take all necessary corporate or other
action to authorize and reserve for issuance all additional Red Brick Shares or
other securities which may be issuable pursuant to Section 8(a) upon exercise of
the Option, all of which, upon their issuance and delivery in accordance with
the terms of this Agreement, will be validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable; (e) upon delivery of the Red Brick Shares and any other
securities to Informix upon exercise of the Option, Informix will acquire such
Red Brick Shares or other securities free and clear of all material claims,
liens, charges, encumbrances and security interests of any kind or nature
whatsoever, excluding those imposed by Informix; (f) the execution and delivery
of this Agreement by Red Brick do not, and the performance of this Agreement by
Red Brick will not, (i) violate the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of
Red Brick, (ii) conflict with or violate any order applicable to Red Brick or
any of its subsidiaries or by which they or any of their property is bound or
affected or (iii) result in any breach of or constitute a default (or an event
which with notice or lapse of time or both would become a default) under, or
give rise to any right of termination, amendment, acceleration or cancellation
of, or result in the creation of a lien or encumbrance on any property or assets
of Red Brick or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to, any contract or agreement
to which Red Brick or any of its subsidiaries is a party or by which Red Brick
or any of its subsidiaries or any of their property is bound or affected,
except, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii) above, for violations, conflicts,
breaches, defaults, rights of termination, amendment, acceleration or
cancellation, liens or encumbrances which would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Red Brick; and (g) the execution
and delivery of this Agreement by Red Brick does not, and the performance of
this Agreement by Red Brick will not, require any consent, approval,
authorization or permit of, or filing with, or notification to, any Governmental
Entity except pursuant to the HSR Act.
6. CERTAIN RIGHTS
(a) INFORMIX PUT. Informix may deliver to Red Brick a written notice (a
"PUT NOTICE") at any time during which Informix may deliver an Exercise Notice
specifying that it wishes to sell the Option, to the extent not previously
exercised, at the price set forth in subparagraph (i) below (as limited by
subparagraph (iii) below), and the Option Shares, if any, acquired by Informix
pursuant thereto, at the price set forth in subparagraph (ii) below (as limited
by subparagraph (iii) below) (the "PUT"). At any time after delivery of a Put
Notice, unless such Put Notice is withdrawn by Informix, the closing of the Put
(the "PUT CLOSING") shall take place at the principal offices of Red Brick upon
the occurrence of an Exercise Event or at such later date prior to the
termination of the Option as may be designated by Informix in writing. In the
event that no Exercise Event shall occur prior to termination of the Option,
such Put Notice shall be void and of no further force and effect.:
(i) The difference between the "MARKET/TENDER OFFER PRICE" for Red Brick
Shares as of the date Informix gives notice of its intent to exercise its rights
under this Section 6(a) (defined as the higher of (A) the highest price per
share offered as of such date pursuant to any Acquisition Transaction which was
made prior to such date and not terminated or withdrawn as of such date and (B)
the highest closing sale price of Red Brick Shares on the Nasdaq National Market
during the twenty (20) trading days ending on the trading day immediately
preceding such date) and the Exercise Price, multiplied by the number of Red
Brick Shares purchasable pursuant to the Option, but only if the Market/Tender
Offer Price is greater than the Exercise Price. For purposes of determining the
highest price offered pursuant to any Acquisition
A-B-3
<PAGE>
Transaction which involves consideration other than cash, the value of such
consideration shall be equal to the higher of (x) if securities of the same
class of the proponent as such consideration are traded on any national
securities exchange or by any registered securities association, a value based
on the closing sale price or asked price for such securities on their principal
trading market on such date and (y) the value ascribed to such consideration by
the proponent of such Acquisition Transaction, or if no such value is ascribed,
a value determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of Red Brick.
(ii) The Exercise Price paid by Informix for Red Brick Shares acquired
pursuant to the Option PLUS the difference between the Market/Tender Offer Price
and such Exercise Price (but only if the Market/ Tender Offer Price is greater
than the Exercise Price) multiplied by the number of Red Brick Shares so
purchased. If Informix issued Informix Shares in connection with any exercise of
the Option, the Exercise Price in connection with such exercise shall be
calculated as set forth in the last sentence of Section 1 as if Informix had
exercised its right to pay cash instead of issuing Informix Shares.
(iii) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (i) and (ii) above, pursuant to this
Section 6 Red Brick shall not be required to pay Informix in excess of an
aggregate of (A) (x) $2,000,000 PLUS (y) the Exercise Price paid by Informix for
Red Brick Shares acquired pursuant to the Option and put to Red Brick pursuant
to Section 6 minus (B) the gain received by Informix on sale(s) of Option Shares
to third parties. The parties intend Informix profit received pursuant to this
Option not to exceed $2,000,000 and Section 3(d) and Section 6(a)(iii) shall be
read collectively to achieve such purpose.
(b) PAYMENT AND REDELIVERY OF OPTION OR SHARES. At the Put Closing, Red
Brick shall pay the required amount to Informix in immediately available funds
and Informix shall surrender to Red Brick the Option and the certificates
evidencing the Red Brick Shares purchased by Informix pursuant thereto.
7. REGISTRATION RIGHTS
(a) Following the termination of the Merger Agreement, Informix (sometimes
referred to herein as a "HOLDER") may by written notice (sometimes referred to
herein as the "REGISTRATION NOTICE") to Red Brick (the "REGISTRANT") request the
Registrant to register under the Securities Act all or any part of the shares
acquired by such Holder pursuant to this Agreement (the "REGISTRABLE
SECURITIES") in order to permit the sale or other disposition of such shares
pursuant to a BONA FIDE firm commitment underwritten public offering in which
the Holder and the underwriters shall effect as wide a distribution of such
Registrable Securities as is reasonably practicable and shall use reasonable
efforts to prevent any person or group from purchasing through such offering
shares representing more than 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of
the Registrant on a fully diluted basis (a "PERMITTED OFFERING"); PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, that any such Registration Notice must relate to a number of shares
equal to at least 2% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Registrant
on a fully diluted basis and that any rights to require registration hereunder
shall terminate with respect to any shares that may be sold pursuant to Rule
144(k) under the Securities Act. The Registration Notice shall include a
certificate executed by the Holder and its proposed managing underwriter, which
underwriter shall be an investment banking firm of internationally recognized
standing reasonably acceptable to the Company (the "MANAGER"), stating that (i)
the Holder and the Manager have a good faith intention to commence a Permitted
Offering and (ii) the Manager in good faith believes that, based on the then
prevailing market conditions, it will be able to sell the Registrable Securities
at a per share price equal to at least 80% of the per share average of the
closing sale prices of the Registrant's Common Stock on the Nasdaq National
Market for the twenty trading days immediately preceding the date of the
Registration Notice. The Registrant shall thereupon have the option exercisable
by written notice delivered to the Holder within ten business days after the
receipt of the Registration Notice, irrevocably to agree to purchase all or any
part of the Registrable Securities for cash at a price (the "OPTION PRICE" equal
to the product of (i) the number of Registrable Securities so purchased and (ii)
the per share average of the closing sale prices of the Registrant's Common
Stock on the Nasdaq National Market for the twenty trading days immediately
preceding the date of the Registration Notice. Any such purchase of Registrable
Securities by the Registrant hereunder shall take place at a closing to be held
at the principal executive offices of the Registrant or its counsel at any
reasonable date and time designated by
A-B-4
<PAGE>
the Registrant in such notice within 10 business days after delivery of such
notice. The payment for the shares to be purchased shall be made by delivery at
the time of such closing of the Option Price in immediately available funds.
(b) If the Registrant does not elect to exercise its option to purchase
pursuant to Section 7(a) with respect to all Registrable Securities, the
Registrant shall use all reasonable efforts to effect, as promptly as
practicable, the registration under the Securities Act of the unpurchased
Registrable Securities requested to be registered in the Registration Notice;
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that (i) the Holder shall not be entitled to more than an
aggregate of two effective registration statements hereunder and (ii) the
Registrant will not be required to file any such registration statement during
any period of time (not to exceed 40 days after a Registration Notice in the
case of clause (A) below or 90 days after a Registration Notice in the case of
clauses (B) and (C) below) when (A) the Registrant is in possession of material
nonpublic information which it reasonably believes would be detrimental to be
disclosed at such time and, in the written opinion of counsel to such
Registrant, such information would have to be disclosed if a registration
statement were filed at that time; (B) such Registrant is required under the
Securities Act to include audited financial statements for any period in such
registration statement and such financial statements are not yet available for
inclusion in such registration statement; or (C) such Registrant determines, in
its reasonable judgment, that such registration would interfere with any
financing, acquisition or other material transaction involving the Registrant.
If consummation of the sale of any Registrable Securities pursuant to a
registration hereunder does not occur within 180 days after the filing with the
SEC of the initial registration statement therefor, the provisions of this
Section 7 shall again be applicable to any proposed registration, it being
understood that neither party shall be entitled to more than an aggregate of two
effective registration statements hereunder. The Registrant shall use all
reasonable efforts to cause any Registrable Securities registered pursuant to
this Section 7 to be qualified for sale under the securities or blue sky laws of
such jurisdictions as the Holder may reasonably request and shall continue such
registration or qualification in effect in such jurisdictions; PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, that the Registrant shall not be required to qualify to do business in,
or consent to general service of process in, any jurisdiction by reason of this
provision.
(c) The registration rights set forth in this Section 7 are subject to the
condition that the Holder shall provide the Registrant with such information
with respect to such Holder's Registrable Securities, the plan for distribution
thereof, and such other information with respect to such Holder as, in the
reasonable judgment of counsel for the Registrant, is necessary to enable the
Registrant to include in a registration statement all material facts required to
be disclosed with respect to a registration thereunder.
(d) A registration effected under this Section 7 shall be effected at the
Registrant's expense, except for underwriting discounts and commissions and the
fees and expenses of counsel to the Holder, and the Registrant shall use all
reasonable efforts to provide to the underwriters such documentation (including
certificates, opinions of counsel and "comfort" letters from auditors) as are
customary in connection with underwritten public offerings and as such
underwriters may reasonably require. In connection with any registration, the
Holder and the Registrant agree to enter into an underwriting agreement
reasonably acceptable to each such party, in form and substance customary for
transactions of this type with the underwriters participating in such offering.
(e) INDEMNIFICATION
(i) The Registrant will indemnify the Holder, each of its directors and
officers and each person who controls the Holder within the meaning of Section
15 of the Securities Act, and each underwriter of the Registrant's securities,
with respect to any registration, qualification or compliance which has been
effected pursuant to this Agreement, against all expenses, claims, losses,
damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof), including any of the
foregoing incurred in settlement of any litigation, commenced or threatened,
arising out of or based on any untrue statement (or alleged untrue statement) of
a material fact contained in any registration statement, prospectus, offering
circular or other document, or any amendment or supplement thereto, incident to
any such registration, qualification or compliance, or based on any
A-B-5
<PAGE>
omission (or alleged omission) to state therein a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances in which they were made, not misleading, or any violation by the
Registrant of any rule or regulation promulgated under the Securities Act
applicable to the Registrant in connection with any such registration,
qualification or compliance, and the Registrant will reimburse the Holder and,
each of its directors and officers and each person who controls the Holder
within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, and each underwriter for
any legal and any other expenses reasonably incurred in connection with
investigating, preparing or defending any such claim, loss, damage, liability or
action, provided that the Registrant will not be liable in any such case to the
extent that any such claim, loss, damage, liability or expense arises out of or
is based on any untrue statement or omission or alleged untrue statement or
omission, made in reliance upon and in conformity with written information
furnished to the Registrant by such Holder or director or officer or controlling
person or underwriter seeking indemnification.
(ii) The Holder will indemnify the Registrant, each of its directors and
officers and each underwriter of the Registrant's securities covered by such
registration statement and each person who controls the Registrant within the
meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, against all claims, losses, damages
and liabilities (or actions in respect thereof), including any of the foregoing
incurred in settlement of any litigation, commenced or threatened, arising out
of or based on any untrue statement (or alleged untrue statement) of a material
fact contained in any such registration statement, prospectus, offering circular
or other document, or any omission (or alleged omission) to state therein a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein not misleading, or any violation by the Holder of any rule or regulation
promulgated under the Securities Act applicable to the Holder in connection with
any such registration, qualification or compliance, and will reimburse the
Registrant, such directors, officers or control persons or underwriters for any
legal or any other expenses reasonably incurred in connection with
investigating, preparing or defending any such claim, loss, damage, liability or
action, in each case to the extent, but only to the extent, that such untrue
statement (or alleged untrue statement) or omission (or alleged omission) is
made in such registration statement, prospectus, offering circular or other
document in reliance upon and in conformity with written information furnished
to the Registrant by the Holder for use therein, provided that in no event shall
any indemnity under this Section 8(e) exceed the gross proceeds of the offering
received by the Holder.
(iii) Each party entitled to indemnification under this Section 7(e) (the
"INDEMNIFIED PARTY") shall give notice to the party required to provide
indemnification (the "INDEMNIFYING PARTY") promptly after such Indemnified Party
has actual knowledge of any claim as to which indemnity may be sought, and shall
permit the Indemnifying Party to assume the defense of any such claim or any
litigation resulting therefrom, provided that counsel for the Indemnifying
Party, who shall conduct the defense of such claim or litigation, shall be
approved by the Indemnified Party (whose approval shall not unreasonably be
withheld), and the Indemnified Party may participate in such defense at such
party's expense; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Indemnifying Party shall pay such
expense if representation of the Indemnified Party by counsel retained by the
Indemnifying Party would be inappropriate due to actual or potential differing
interests between the Indemnified Party and any other party represented by such
counsel in such proceeding, and PROVIDED FURTHER that the failure of any
Indemnified Party to give notice as provided herein shall not relieve the
Indemnifying Party of its obligations under this Section 7(e) unless the failure
to give such notice is materially prejudicial to an Indemnifying Party's ability
to defend such action. No Indemnifying Party, in the defense of any such claim
or litigation shall, except with the consent of each Indemnified Party, consent
to entry of any judgment or enter into any settlement which does not include as
an unconditional term thereof the giving by the claimant or plaintiff to such
Indemnified Party of a release from all liability in respect to such claim or
litigation. No Indemnifying Party shall be required to indemnify any Indemnified
Party with respect to any settlement entered into without such Indemnifying
Party's prior consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld).
A-B-6
<PAGE>
(f) NO CONFLICT. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Informix
hereby agrees that the rights granted by this Section 7 shall not conflict with
the limitation on subsequent registration rights contained in Section 1.14 of
the Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as of November 5, 1993.
8. ADJUSTMENT UPON CHANGES IN CAPITALIZATION; RIGHTS PLANS
(a) In the event of any change in the Red Brick Shares by reason of stock
dividends, stock splits, reverse stock splits, mergers (other than the Merger),
recapitalizations, combinations, exchanges of shares and the like, the type and
number of shares or securities subject to the Option and the Exercise Price
shall be adjusted appropriately, and proper provision shall be made in the
agreements governing such transaction so that Informix shall receive, upon
exercise of the Option, the number and class of shares or other securities or
property that Informix would have received in respect of the Red Brick Shares if
the Option had been exercised immediately prior to such event or the record date
therefor, as applicable.
(b) At any time during which the Option is exercisable, and at any time
after the Option is exercised (in whole or in part, if at all), Red Brick shall
not amend its Rights Agreement nor adopt a new stockholders rights plan that
contains provisions for the distribution of rights thereunder as a result of
Informix being the beneficial owner of shares of Red Brick by virtue of the
Option being exercisable or having been exercised (or as a result of such other
party beneficially owning shares issuable in respect of any Option Shares).
9. RESTRICTIVE LEGENDS
Each certificate representing Option Shares issued to Informix hereunder
shall include a legend in substantially the following form:
THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY BE REOFFERED OR
SOLD ONLY IF SO REGISTERED OR IF AN EXEMPTION FROM SUCH REGISTRATION IS
AVAILABLE. SUCH SECURITIES ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS
ON TRANSFER AS SET FORTH IN THE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT DATED AS OF
OCTOBER 7, 1998, A COPY OF WHICH MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE ISSUER.
10. LISTING AND HSR FILING
Red Brick, upon the request of Informix, shall promptly file an application
to list the Red Brick Shares to be acquired upon exercise of the Option for
quotation on the Nasdaq National Market and shall use its reasonable efforts to
obtain approval of such listing as soon as practicable. Promptly after the date
hereof, each of the parties hereto shall promptly file with the Federal Trade
Commission and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice
all required premerger notification and report forms and other documents and
exhibits required to be filed under the HSR Act to permit the acquisition of the
Red Brick Shares subject to the Option at the earliest possible date.
11. BINDING EFFECT
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Nothing contained
in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any person
other than the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted
assigns any rights or remedies of any nature whatsoever by reason of this
Agreement. Certificates representing shares sold in a registered public offering
pursuant to Section 7 shall not be required to bear the legend set forth in
Section 9.
A-B-7
<PAGE>
12. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The parties recognize and agree that if for any reason any of the provisions
of this Agreement are not performed in accordance with their specific terms or
are otherwise breached, immediate and irreparable harm or injury would be caused
for which money damages would not be an adequate remedy. Accordingly, each party
agrees that in addition to other remedies the other party shall be entitled to
an injunction restraining any violation or threatened violation of the
provisions of this Agreement. In the event that any action shall be brought in
equity to enforce the provisions of the Agreement, neither party will allege,
and each party hereby waives the defense, that there is an adequate remedy at
law.
13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement and the Merger Agreement (including the appendices and
exhibits thereto) constitute the entire agreement between the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all other prior agreements
and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to
the subject matter hereof.
14. FURTHER ASSURANCES
Each party will execute and deliver all such further documents and
instruments and take all such further action as may be necessary in order to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
15. VALIDITY
The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall
not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions of this
Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. In the event any
Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction holds any provision of this
Agreement to be null, void or unenforceable, the parties hereto shall negotiate
in good faith and shall execute and deliver an amendment to this Agreement in
order, as nearly as possible, to effectuate, to the extent permitted by law, the
intent of the parties hereto with respect to such provision.
16. NOTICES
All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall
be deemed given if delivered personally or by commercial delivery service, or
sent via telecopy (receipt confirmed) to the parties at the following addresses
or telecopy numbers (or at such other address or telecopy numbers for a party as
shall be specified by like notice):
(a) if to Red Brick, to:
Red Brick Systems, Inc.
485 Alberto Way
Los Gatos, CA 95032
Telephone: (408) 399-3200
Facsimile: (408) 399-7264
Attn: President and Executive Officer
with a copy to:
Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve
Franklin & Hachigian, LLP
155 Constitution Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 321-2400
Facsimile: (650) 321-2800
Attn: Daniel E. O'Connor, Esq.
A-B-8
<PAGE>
(b) if to Informix, to:
Informix Corporation
4100 Bohannon Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 926-6300
Facsimile: (650) 322-1239
Attn: President and Executive Officer
with a copy to:
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
Attn: Martin W. Korman, Esq/Jeffrey A. Herbst, Esq.
17. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed
entirely within such State.
18. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in two counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed to be an original, but both of which, taken together, shall constitute
one and the same instrument.
19. EXPENSES
Except as otherwise expressly provided herein or in the Merger Agreement,
all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses.
20. AMENDMENTS; WAIVER
This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto and the terms and
conditions hereof may be waived only by an instrument in writing signed on
behalf of each of the parties hereto, or, in the case of a waiver, by an
instrument signed on behalf of the party waiving compliance.
21. ASSIGNMENT
Red Brick may not sell, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of any of its
rights or obligations under this Agreement or the Option created hereunder to
any other person, without the express written consent of Informix. The rights
and obligations hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon any
successor of a party hereto.
A-B-9
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date first above
written.
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
By:
--------------------------------------
Name: Christopher G. Erickson
Title: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
INFORMIX CORPORATION
By:
--------------------------------------
Name: Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.
Title: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
A-B-10
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT C TO MERGER AGREEMENT
FORM OF AFFILIATE AGREEMENT
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
AFFILIATE AGREEMENT
This AFFILIATE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of
October 7, 1998, between Informix Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Parent"), and the undersigned stockholder (the "Affiliate") of Red Brick
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").
RECITALS
A. The Parent, the Company, and IC Merger Corporation, a Delaware
corporation ("Sub"), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization
(the "Merger Agreement") dated as of October , 1998 pursuant to which Sub will
merge with and into the Company (the "Merger"), and the Company will become a
subsidiary of Parent (capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have
the meanings ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement);
B. Pursuant to the Merger, at the Effective Time, outstanding shares of
Company Common Stock, including any shares owned by Affiliate, will be converted
into the right to receive shares of Parent Common Stock;
C. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Affiliate is a
material inducement to Parent to enter into the Merger Agreement;
D. It is intended that the Merger will constitute a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended
(the "Code"), and that it will be a condition to the effectiveness of the Merger
that legal counsel for each of the Company and Parent deliver written opinions
to such effect;
E. The Affiliate has been advised that Affiliate may be deemed to be an
"affiliate" of the Company, as the term "affiliate" is used for purposes of
paragraphs (c) and (d) of Rule 145 of the Rules and Regulations (the "Rules and
Regulations") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), as
amended, although nothing contained herein shall be construed as an admission by
Affiliate that Affiliate is in fact an "affiliate" of the Company.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereby agree as
follows:
1. COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 145 AND THE SECURITIES ACT.
(a) The Affiliate has been advised that (i) the issuance of shares of Parent
Common Stock in connection with the Merger is expected to be effected pursuant
to a Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be filed with the Commission to
register the shares of Parent Common Stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"), and as such will not be deemed "restricted
securities" within the meaning of Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act,
and resale of such shares will not be subject to any restrictions other than as
set forth in Rule 145 under the Securities Act (which will not apply if such
shares are otherwise transferred pursuant to an effective registration statement
under the Securities Act or an appropriate exemption from registration), and
(ii) the Affiliate may be deemed to be an "affiliate" of the Company within the
meaning of the Securities Act and, in particular, Rule 145 promulgated
thereunder. Affiliate accordingly agrees not to sell, transfer, or otherwise
dispose of any Parent Common Stock issued to the Affiliate in the Merger unless
(i) such sale, transfer or other disposition is made in conformity with the
requirements of Rule 145(d) promulgated under the Securities Act; (ii) such
sale, transfer or other disposition is made pursuant to an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act; or (iii) the Affiliate delivers
to Parent a written opinion of counsel, reasonably acceptable to Parent in form
and substance, that such sale, transfer, or other disposition is otherwise
exempt from registration under the Securities Act. In connection with the
obligations of the Affiliate hereunder, Parent agrees to file all
A-C-1
<PAGE>
reports required under the Exchange Act to satisfy the requirements of Rule
144(c) as long as the Affiliate shall be subject to the requirements of Rule
145.
(b) Parent will give stop transfer instructions to its transfer agent with
respect to any Parent Common Stock received by Affiliate pursuant to the Merger,
and there will be placed on the certificates representing such Common Stock, or
any substitutions therefor, a legend stating in substance:
"The shares represented by this certificate were issued in a transaction to
which Rule 145 applies and may only be transferred in conformity with Rule
145(d), pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or in accordance with a written opinion of counsel,
reasonably acceptable to the issuer in form and substance, that such
transfer is exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended."
The foregoing legend shall be removed (by delivery of a substitute
certificate without such legend) if the Affiliate delivers to Parent (i)
satisfactory written evidence that the shares have been sold in compliance with
Rule 145 (in which case, the substitute certificate will be issued in the name
of the transferee) or (ii) an opinion of counsel, in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to Parent, to the effect that public sale of the shares
by the holder thereof is no longer subject to Rule 145.
2. SHARE OWNERSHIP. The Affiliate is the beneficial owner of that number
of shares of Company Common Stock (including shares issuable upon exercise of
stock options and warrants) as set forth on the signature page hereto (the
"Company Securities"). Except for the Company Securities, the Affiliate does not
beneficially own any shares of Company Common Stock or any other equity
securities of the Company or any options, warrants, or other rights to acquire
any equity securities of the Company.
3. MISCELLANEOUS.
(a) For the convenience of the parties hereto, this Agreement may be
executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,
but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
(b) This Agreement shall be enforceable by, and shall inure to the benefit
of and be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective successors and
assigns. As used herein, the term "successors and assigns" shall mean, where the
context so permits, heirs, executors, administrators, trustees and successor
trustees, and personal and other representatives.
(c) This Agreement shall be governed by and construed, interpreted and
enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of California.
(d) If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that any provision of
this Agreement is not enforceable or enforceable only if limited in time or
scope, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect with such
provision stricken or so limited.
(e) Counsel to the parties to the Merger Agreement shall be entitled to rely
upon this Agreement as appropriate.
(f) This Agreement shall not be modified or amended, or any right hereunder
waived or any obligation excused, except by a written agreement signed by both
parties.
[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
A-C-2
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Affiliate Agreement as of
the date set forth on the first page of this Agreement.
INFORMIX CORPORATION
By:___________________________________
Name: Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.
Title: President and Chief Executive
Office
AFFILIATE
______________________________________
Name:
Title:
Company shares beneficially owned:
______________ shares of Common Stock
Company shares subject to outstanding
options:
______________ shares of Common Stock
Company shares subject to outstanding
warrants:
______________ shares of Common Stock
***AFFILIATE AGREEMENT***
A-C-3
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT D-1 TO MERGER AGREEMENT
PERSONS TO SIGN NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Ron Barale
Peggy DeLeon
Lawrence Howard
Andrew W. Priest
Paul Rodwick
Kristi L. Smith
</TABLE>
A-D-1-1
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT D-2 TO MERGER AGREEMENT
FORM OF NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT
<PAGE>
NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT
This NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT is being executed and delivered as of October
7, 1998 by (the "Stockholder") in favor of and for the
benefit of Informix Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), and Red
Brick Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").
RECITALS
A. As an employee and stockholder and/or optionholder of the Company,
Stockholder has obtained and will obtain extensive and valuable knowledge and
information concerning the business of the Company (including confidential
information relating to the Company and its operations, assets, contracts,
customers, personnel, plans and prospects).
B. Contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Noncompetition
Agreement, the Company is entering into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization
with Parent and a subsidiary of Parent (the "Reorganization Agreement"), which
provides (subject to the conditions set forth therein) for the merger of
Parent's subsidiary into the Company (the "Merger"). It is contemplated that, as
a result of the Merger, the Company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Parent, and Stockholder will receive shares of common stock of Parent in
exchange for Stockholder's shares of common stock of the Company.
C. In connection with the Merger (and as a condition to entering into the
Reorganization Agreement and consummating the Merger), and to more fully secure
unto Parent the benefits of the Merger, Parent has requested that Stockholder
enter into this Noncompetition Agreement; and Stockholder is entering into this
Noncompetition Agreement in order to induce Parent to enter into the
Reorganization Agreement and consummate the Merger.
D. The Company has conducted, is conducting and will continue to conduct
its businesses on a worldwide basis.
AGREEMENT
In order to induce Parent to enter into the Reorganization Agreement and
consummate the Merger, and in consideration of the issuance and delivery to
Stockholder of shares of common stock of Parent pursuant to the Reorganization
Agreement, Stockholder agrees as follows:
1. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BY STOCKHOLDER. Stockholder acknowledges that the
promises and restrictive covenants that Stockholder is providing in this
Noncompetition Agreement are reasonable and necessary to the protection of
Parent's legitimate interests in its acquisition of the Company (including the
Company's goodwill) pursuant to the Reorganization Agreement. Stockholder
acknowledges that, in connection with the consummation of the Merger, all of the
Stockholder's shares of stock of the Company will be exchanged for shares of
common stock of Parent.
2. NONCOMPETITION. During the Restriction Period (as defined below),
Stockholder shall not (other than in connection with employment with the
Company, Parent, their successors, or assigns):
(a) be or become an officer, director, stockholder, owner, affiliate,
salesperson, co-owner, partner, trustee, promoter, technician, engineer,
analyst, employee, agent, representative, supplier, consultant, advisor or
manager of or to, or otherwise acquire or hold any interest in, any person or
entity that competes in the market for data warehousing software applications
(including, without limitation, related client/server relational database
management applications) for or on behalf of Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, Sybase,
Teradata/NCR, Broadbase, Platinum Software, Information Advantage,
Arbor/Hyperion or Microstrategy; or
(b) provide any service (as an employee, consultant or otherwise), support,
product or technology to any person or entity, if such service, support, product
or technology involves or relates to software development in the market for data
warehousing software applications (including, without limitation,
A-D-2-1
<PAGE>
related client/server relational database management applications) for or on
behalf of Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, Sybase, Teradata/NCR, Broadbase, Platinum
Software, Information Advantage, Arbor/Hyperion or Microstrategy;
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that nothing in this Section 2 shall prevent Stockholder from
owning as a passive investment less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the
capital stock of a publicly-held Company if (A) such shares are actively traded
on an established national securities market in the United States and (B)
Stockholder is not otherwise associated directly or indirectly with such
corporation or any affiliate of such corporation; PROVIDED, FURTHER, that
nothing in this Section 2 shall prevent Stockholder from continuing a
previously-established employment relationship following the acquisition of the
employer by an entity identified in subsections 2(a) and 2(b) above; and
PROVIDED, FURTHER, that nothing in this Section 2 shall prevent Stockholder from
entering into arms length reseller or marketing transactions with an entity
identified in subsections 2(a) and 2(b) above.
"Restriction Period" as used herein shall mean the period commencing on the
Effective Date and ending on the date that is 12 months from the Effective Date.
3. NONSOLICITATION. Stockholder further agrees that Stockholder will not:
(a) personally or through others, encourage, induce, attempt to induce,
solicit or attempt to solicit (on Stockholder's own behalf or on behalf of any
other person or entity) during the Restriction Period any employee of the
Company, Parent or any of Parent's subsidiaries to leave his or her employment
with the Company, Parent or any of Parent's subsidiaries;
(b) employ, or permit any entity over which Stockholder exercises voting
control to employ, during the Restriction Period any person who shall have
voluntarily terminated his or her employment with the Company, Parent or any of
Parent's subsidiaries, provided, however, that any such person may be so
employed six months following that individual's termination of employment with
the Company, Parent or any of Parent's subsidiaries; or
(c) personally or through others, interfere or attempt to interfere in a
material manner (other than through legitimate business competition) with the
relationship or prospective relationship of the Company, Parent or any of
Parent's subsidiaries with any person or entity that is, was or is expected to
become a customer or client of the Company, Parent or any of Parent's
subsidiaries.
4. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Stockholder agrees that in the event of any
breach by Stockholder of any covenant, obligation or other provision contained
in this Noncompetition Agreement, Parent and the Company shall be entitled (to
the extent permitted by applicable law in addition to any other remedy that may
be available to them including but not limited to a claim for damages based on
the stock and cash consideration paid to Stockholder by Parent) to the extent
permitted by applicable law (a) a decree or order of specific performance to
enforce the observance and performance of such covenant, obligation or other
provision, and (b) an injunction restraining such breach or threatened breach.
5. NON-EXCLUSIVITY. The rights and remedies of Parent and the Company
hereunder are not exclusive of or limited by any other rights or remedies which
Parent or the Company may have, whether at law, in equity, by contract or
otherwise, all of which shall be cumulative (and not alternative). Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rights and remedies of Parent and
the Company hereunder, and the obligations and liabilities of Stockholder
hereunder, are in addition to their respective rights, remedies, obligations and
liabilities under the law of unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets and the like.
6. NOTICES. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be
delivered to Stockholder, the Company or Parent under this Noncompetition
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly delivered, given and
received when delivered (by hand, by registered mail, by courier or express
delivery service or by facsimile) to the address or facsimile telephone number
set forth beneath the
A-D-2-2
<PAGE>
name of such party below (or to such other address or facsimile telephone number
as such party shall have specified in a written notice delivered in accordance
with this Section 7):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
IF TO PARENT: Informix Corporation
4100 Bohannon Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Attention: General Counsel
Facsimile No.: (650) 926-6300
IF TO At the address provided by
STOCKHOLDER: Stockholder to Parent in writing.
</TABLE>
7. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Noncompetition Agreement or any
part of any such provision is held under any circumstances to be invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then (a) such provision or part thereof
shall, with respect to such circumstances and in such jurisdiction, be deemed
amended to conform to applicable laws so as to be valid and enforceable to the
fullest possible extent, (b) the invalidity or unenforceability of such
provision or part thereof under such circumstances and in such jurisdiction
shall not affect the validity or enforceability of such provision or part
thereof under any other circumstances or in any other jurisdiction, and (c) such
invalidity of enforceability of such provision or part thereof shall not affect
the validity or enforceability of the remainder of such provision or the
validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Noncompetition
Agreement. Each provision of this Noncompetition Agreement is separable from
every other provision of this Noncompetition Agreement, and each part of each
provision of this Noncompetition Agreement is separable from every other part of
such provision.
8. GOVERNING LAW. This Noncompetition Agreement shall be construed in
accordance with, and governed in all respects by, the laws of the State of
California (without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws).
9. WAIVER. No failure on the part of Parent or the Company to exercise any
power, right, privilege or remedy under this Noncompetition Agreement, and no
delay on the part of Parent or the Company in exercising any power, right,
privilege or remedy under this Noncompetition Agreement, shall operate as a
waiver of such power, right, privilege or remedy; and no single or partial
exercise of any such power, right, privilege or remedy shall preclude any other
or further exercise thereof or of any other power, right, privilege or remedy.
Neither Parent nor the Company shall be deemed to have waived any claim arising
out of this Noncompetition Agreement, or any power, right, privilege or remedy
under this Noncompetition Agreement, unless the waiver of such claim, power,
right, privilege or remedy is expressly set forth in a written instrument duly
executed and delivered on behalf of such party; and any such waiver shall not be
applicable or have any effect except in the specific instance in which it is
given.
10. CAPTIONS. The captions contained in this Noncompetition Agreement are
for convenience of reference only, shall not be deemed to be a part of this
Noncompetition Agreement and shall not be referred to in connection with the
construction or interpretation of this Noncompetition Agreement.
11. FURTHER ASSURANCES. Stockholder shall execute and/or cause to be
delivered to the Company and Parent such instruments and other documents and
shall take such other actions as Company and Parent may reasonably request to
effectuate the intent and purposes of this Noncompetition Agreement.
12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Noncompetition Agreement, and the other
agreements referred to herein set forth the entire understanding of Stockholder,
the Company and Parent relating to the subject matter hereof and thereof and
supersede all prior agreements and understandings between any of such parties
relating to the subject matter hereof and thereof.
A-D-2-3
<PAGE>
13. AMENDMENTS. This Noncompetition Agreement may not be amended,
modified, altered, or supplemented other than by means of a written instrument
duly executed and delivered on behalf of Parent and Stockholder.
14. ASSIGNMENT. This Noncompetition Agreement and all obligations
hereunder are personal to Stockholder and may not be transferred or assigned by
Stockholder at any time. Parent may assign its rights under this Noncompetition
Agreement to any entity in connection with any sale or transfer of all or
substantially all of Parent's assets to such entity.
15. BINDING NATURE. Subject to Section 15, this Noncompetition Agreement
will be binding upon Stockholder and Stockholder's representatives, executors,
administrators, estate, heirs, successors and assigns, and will inure to the
benefit of Parent and the Company and their respective successors and assigns.
16. ARBITRATION.
(a) ARBITRATION Except as noted in 16(b) below, the Stockholder and Parent
agree that any and all past or present dispute or controversy arising out of or
relating to this Agreement shall be subject to binding arbitration held in San
Mateo County, California, under the Arbitration Rules set forth in California
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280 through 1294.2, including Section 1283.05
(the "Rules") and pursuant to California law. Each party shall be allowed to
take three (3) depositions and to make a reasonable request for documents. The
arbitrator shall be knowledgeable in the industry and shall be mutually agreed
upon by the Stockholder and the Parent. If an arbitrator cannot be mutually
agreed upon, each party shall select an arbitrator and the two arbitrators shall
select a third to constitute an arbitration panel. Any arbitration shall take
place within sixty (60) days of the intial demand or, if the parties are unable
to agree on a mutual arbitrator, then within sixty (60) days of the date the
three person panel is chosen, except if the arbitrator(s) are unable to hold the
arbitration within such time period then the arbitration shall be held based
upon the availability and schedule of such arbitrator(s).
(b) SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND EQUITABLE REMEDIES. Stockholder agrees that if
he breaches any Section of this Agreement, Parent will have available, in
addition to any rights under this Arbitration Provision, the right to obtain an
injunction from a Court of competent jurisdiction restraining such breach or
threatened breach and to specific performance, as noted in Paragraph 4 above.
Stockholder further agrees that no bond or other security shall be required in
obtaining such equitable relief and hereby consents to the issuance of such
injunction and to the ordering of specific performance.
17. EFFECTIVENESS. This Agreement shall become effective upon the Closing,
as defined in the Merger Agreement, and, if the Closing does not occur prior to
Feburary 28, 1999, this Agreement shall immediately terminate and be of
nofurther force or effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Noncompetition
Agreement as of the date first above written.
______________________________________
Name:
A-D-2-4
<PAGE>
ANNEX B
MORGAN STANLEY
MORGAN STANLEY & CO.
INCORPORATED
2725 SAND HILL ROAD
BUILDING C - SUITE 200
MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA
94025
October 7, 1998
Board of Directors
Red Brick Systems, Inc.
485 Alberto Way
Los Gatos, CA 95032
Members of the Board:
We understand that Red Brick Systems, Inc. ("Red Brick" or the "Company"),
Informix Corporation ("Informix") and IC Merger Corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Informix ("Merger Sub") propose to enter into an Agreement and
Plan of Reorganization, substantially in the form of the draft dated October 5,
1998 (the "Agreement"), which provides, among other things, for the merger (the
"Merger") of Merger Sub with and into Red Brick. Pursuant to the Merger, Red
Brick will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Informix and each issued and
outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the "Red Brick
Common Stock") of Red Brick, other than shares held in treasury or held by
Informix or Red Brick or their affiliates, shall be converted into the right to
receive 0.6 shares (the "Exchange Ratio") of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share (the "Informix Common Stock") of Informix, subject to adjustment in
certain circumstances. The terms and conditions of the Merger are more fully set
forth in the Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Exchange Ratio pursuant to the
Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of shares of the
Red Brick Common Stock.
For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have
(i) reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and other
information of the Company and Informix;
(ii) reviewed certain internal financial statements and other financial and
operating data concerning the Company prepared by the management of
the Company;
(iii) discussed the past and current operations and financial condition and
the prospects of the Company and Informix, including information
relating to certain strategic, financial and operational benefits
anticipated from the Merger, with senior executives of the Company and
Informix respectively;
(iv) reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for the Red Brick
Common Stock and Informix Common Stock;
(v) reviewed the pro forma impact of the Merger on Informix's earnings per
share;
(vi) compared the financial performance of the Company and the prices and
trading activity of the Red Brick Common Stock and Informix Common
Stock with that of certain other comparable publicly-traded companies
and their securities;
B-1
<PAGE>
(vii) reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of
certain comparable transactions;
(viii) reviewed and discussed with the managements of the Company and
Informix and their outside advisors certain contingent liabilities of
Informix;
(ix) participated in discussions and negotiations among representatives of
Red Brick and Informix and their financial and legal advisors;
(x) reviewed the draft Agreement and certain related documents; and
(xi) considered such other factors and performed such other analysis as we
have deemed appropriate.
We have assumed and relied upon without independent verification the accuracy
and completeness of the information reviewed by us for the purposes of this
opinion. With respect to the financial and operating data, including information
relating to the strategic, financial and operational benefits anticipated from
the Merger, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the future
financial performance of the Company. We have also relied upon, without
independent verification, the assessment by the managements of Red Brick and
Informix of the strategic and other benefits expected to result from the Merger.
We have also relied upon, without independent verification, the assessment by
the managements of Red Brick and Informix of Red Brick's and Informix's
technologies and products, and the risks associated with Red Brick's and
Informix's existing and future products and technologies. Additionally, we have
assumed that the Merger will be consummated in accordance to the terms set forth
in the Agreement, including, among other things, that the Merger will be treated
as a tax-free reorganization and/or exchange, each pursuant to the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986. We have not made any independent valuation or appraisal of
the assets or liabilities of the Company, nor have we been furnished with any
such appraisals. In addition, with your consent, we have relied upon the
assessment by the managements of the Company and Informix and their outside
advisors with respect to certain contingent liabilities of Informix. Our opinion
is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in
effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of the Company in
connection with this transaction and will receive a fee for our services. In the
past, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and its affiliates have provided
financial advisory and financing services for the Company and Informix and have
received fees for the rendering of these services.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the Board of
Directors of the Company, except that this opinion may be included in its
entirety in any filing made by the Company in respect of the transaction with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, this opinion does not in
any manner address the prices at which the Informix Common Stock will trade
following consummation of the Merger, and Morgan Stanley expresses no opinion or
recommendation as to how the shareholders of the Company should vote at the
shareholders' meeting held in connection with the Merger.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion as of the date
hereof that the Exchange Ratio pursuant to the Agreement is fair from a
financial point of view to the holders of shares of the Red Brick Common Stock.
Very truly yours,
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
By: /s/ MARK S. MENELL
-----------------------------------
Mark S. Menell
Principal
B-2
<PAGE>
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 20. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits a corporation to
include in its charter documents, and in agreements between the corporation and
its directors and officers, provisions expanding the scope of indemnification
beyond that specifically provided by the current law.
Article Eight of the Registrant's Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation provides for the indemnification of directors to the fullest
extent permissible under Delaware law.
Article VI of the Registrant's Bylaws provides for the indemnification of
officers, directors and third parties acting on behalf of the corporation if
such person acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in and
not opposed to the best interest of the corporation, and, with respect to any
criminal action or proceeding, the indemnified party had no reason to believe
his conduct was unlawful.
The Registrant has entered into indemnification agreements with its
directors and executive officers, in addition to indemnification provided for in
the Registrant's Bylaws, and intends to enter into indemnification agreements
with any new directors and executive officers in the future.
ITEM 21. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- -------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
3.1 (4) Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended
3.2 (a)(4) Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended
3.2 (b)(2) Amendment to Bylaws, dated June 19, 1998
3.2 (c)(2) Amendment to Bylaws, dated July 15, 1998
3.3 (5) Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
3.4 (6) Certificate of Designation of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
3.5 (6) Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
4.1 (7) First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of August 12, 1997, between the Registrant and
BankBoston N.A., including the form of Rights Certificate attached thereto as Exhibit A
4.2 (8) Amendment, dated as of November 17, 1997, to the First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement between
the Registrant and BankBoston, N.A.
5.1 (1) Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation regarding legality of the
securities being registered (See Page II-8)
10.1 (2) Form of Change of Control Agreement
10.2 (10) Form of Indemnity Agreement
10.3 (11) 1989 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan
10.4 (3) Amendment to the 1989 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan
10.5 (2) Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant's 1989 Outside Director's Stock
Option Plan
10.6 (12) 1986 Stock Option Plan, as amended
10.7 (13) 1994 Stock Option and Award Plan
</TABLE>
II-1
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- -------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
10.8 (3) Form of Stock Option Agreement and Performance Award Agreement under the Registrant's 1994 Stock
Option and Award Plan
10.9 (13) Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant's 1994 Stock Option Plan
10.10 (14) 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.11 (2) Enrollment/Change Form under the Registrant's 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.12 (15) Employment Agreement, dated July 18, 1997, between the Registrant and Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.
10.13 (15) Offer of Employment Letter, dated September 18, 1997, from the Registrant to Wes Raffel
10.14 (15) Offer of Employment Letter, dated September 24, 1997, from the Registrant to Jean-Yves Dexmier
10.15 (2) Separation Agreement, dated April 18, 1987, between the Registrant and Ronald M. Alvarez
10.16 (2) Separation Agreement, dated May 12, 1997, between the Registrant and Edwin C. Winder
10.17 (16) Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 1989, between the Registrant and Phillip E. White
10.18 (2) Contract of Employment, dated December 5, 1996, between the Registrant and Kenneth Coulter
10.19 (2) Employment Letter Agreement, dated November 25, 1996, between the Registrant and Kenneth Coulter
10.20 (5) Subscription Agreement, dated August 12, 1997, between the Company and Fletcher International
Limited
10.21 (17) Exchange Agreement, dated as of November 17, 1997, between the Company and Fletcher International
Limited
10.22 (17) Amendment No. 1 to Subscription Agreement, dated as of November 17, 1997, between the Company and
Fletcher International Limited
10.23 (6) Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 17, 1997, between the Company and the purchasers
listed therein
10.24 (6) Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 17, 1997, between the Company and the purchasers
listed therein
10.25 (9) Menlo Oaks Corporate Center Standard Business Lease, dated May 16, 1985, between the Registrant and
Amarok Bredero Partners for office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.26 (9) Lease Amendment #1, dated July 2, 1986, between the Registrant and Amarok Bredero Partners for
office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.27 (18) Second Amendment to Lease, dated November 7, 1986 between the Registrant and Amarok Bredero Partners
for office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.28 (19) Third Amendment to Lease, dated June 18, 1991, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.29 (2) Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated June 30, 1997, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.30 (10) Menlo Oaks Corporate Center Standard Business Lease, dated September 4, 1987 between the Registrant
and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P. for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.31 (2) Side Letter Agreement, dated August 31, 1987, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.32 (2) Side Letter Agreement, dated October 27, 1987, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.33 (19) First Amendment to Lease, dated June 18, 1991, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
</TABLE>
II-2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- -------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
10.34 (20) Second Amendment to Lease, dated July 17, 1992, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.35 (2) Third Amendment to Lease, dated June 8, 1993 between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.36 (21) Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated February 10, 1994, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners,
L.P. for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.37 (2) Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated June 30, 1997 between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.38 (21) Menlo Oaks Corporate Center Standard Business Lease, dated February 10, 1994 between the Registrant
and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P. for office space at 4600/4700 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.39 (21) First Amendment to Lease, dated March 17, 1994, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4600/4700 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.40 (2) Second Amendment to Lease, dated September 22, 1994, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners,
L.P. for office space at 4600/4700 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.41 (2) Third Amendment to Lease, dated December 28, 1994, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners,
L.P. for office space at 4600/4700 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.42 (10) Office Lease, dated August 15, 1987, between the Registrant and Southlake Partners #1 for office
space at 15961 College Blvd. and 11170 Lakeview Avenue, Lenexa, Kansas
10.43 (2) First Amendment to Office Lease, dated April 15, 1988, between the Registrant and Southlake Partners
#1 for office space at 15901 College Blvd., Lenexa, Kansas
10.44 (2) Amendment to Office Lease, dated October 20, 1997, between the Registrant and Southlake Partners #1
for office space at 15901 College Blvd. (now 16011 College Blvd) Lenexa, Kansas
10.45 (2) Office Lease, dated October 20, 1997, between the Registrant and Southlake Partners #1 for office
space at 11170 Lakeview Avenue, Lenexa, Kansas
10.46 (2) Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, among Informix Software, Inc., certain
banks and other financial institutions that either now or in the future are parties to the
agreement, BankBoston, N.A. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
10.47 (2) Pledge Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, by and between the Registrant and BankBoston, N.A.
10.48 (2) Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1997, between Informix Software, Inc. and
BankBoston, N.A.
10.49 (2) Continuing Guaranty, dated as of December 31, 1997, by the Registrant
10.50 (3) 1997 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder
10.51 (3) Offer of Employment Letter, dated January 23, 1998, from the Registrant to Susan T. Daniel
10.52 (3) Offer of Employment Letter, dated January 19, 1998, from the Registrant to Gary Lloyd
10.53 (3) Offer of Employment Letter, dated March 11, 1998, from the Registrant to Diane L. Fraiman
10.54 (3) Office Lease, dated November 10, 1994, between WVP Income Plus III and Siebel Systems, L.P.
(assigned to Informix Corporation) for office space at 4005 Bohannon Drive, including addenda and
amendments thereto
10.55 (3) Office Lease, dated April 10, 1995, between the Registrant and 3905 Bohannon Partners for office
space at 3905 Bohannon Drive, including addenda thereto
10.56 (2) 1998 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder
16.1 (24) Letter regarding change in certifying accountants
21.1 (22) Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 (1) Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors (see page II-9)
</TABLE>
II-3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- -------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
23.2 (1) Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditor (see page II-10)
24.1 (1) Power of Attorney (see page II-7)
24.2 (1) Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation (included in Exhibit 5.1)
99.1 Form of Proxy Card for Red Brick Systems, Inc. Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held December
30, 1998.
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Filed herewith
(2) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrants'
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-43991)
(3) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
(4) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 1995
(5) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 25, 1997
(6) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 4, 1997
(7) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the amendment to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A (File No. 000-15325) filed
with the Commission on September 3, 1997
(8) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the amendment to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A (File No. 000-15325) filed
with the Commission on December 3, 1997
(9) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-8006)
(10) Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with the Registrant's annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988
(11) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-31116)
(12) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos: 33-22862, 33-31117 and 33-506-10)
(13) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31369) filed with the
Commission on July 16, 1997
(14) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31371) filed with the
Commission on July 16, 1997
(15) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 1997
(16) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989
(17) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 2, 1997
(18) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1986
(19) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991
II-4
<PAGE>
(20) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992
(21) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993
(22) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
(23) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's annual
report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997
(24) Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant's report on Form
8-K/A filed with the Commission on June 2, 1998
SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
INFORMIX CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONS
--------------------------
BALANCE CHARGED TO
AT CHARGED TO OTHER BALANCE AT
BEGINNING COSTS AND ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS END OF
OF PERIOD EXPENSES (1) (2) PERIOD
----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Year ended December 31, 1997........................ $ 21,429 $ 19,929 $ -- $ 7,551 $ 33,807
Year ended December 31, 1996........................ $ 12,854 $ 15,329 $ (346) $ 6,408 $ 21,429
Year ended December 31, 1995........................ $ 6,049 $ 8,247 $ 261 $ 1,703 $ 12,854
</TABLE>
- --------------------------
(1) Charged (credited) to net revenues
(2) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries
II-5
<PAGE>
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE AT BALANCE AT
BEGINNING END OF PERIOD
OF PERIOD ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS OF PERIOD
----------- ----------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Year ended December 31, 1995.............................. $ 125 $ 545 $ -- $ 670
Year ended December 31, 1996.............................. $ 670 $ 519 $ (231)(1) $ 958
Year ended December 31, 1997.............................. $ 958 $ 658 $ (63)(1) $ 1,553
Nine months ended September 30, 1998...................... $ 1,553 $ -- $ (76)(2) $ 1,477
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Uncollectible accounts written off
(2) Uncollectible accounts written off of $1 and reduction in allowance of $75
ITEM 22. UNDERTAKINGS
(1) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes as follows: that prior to
any public offering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a
prospectus which is a part of this Registration Statement, by any person or
party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the
undersigned Registrant undertakes that such offering prospectus will contain the
information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to
reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other Items of the applicable form.
(2) The Registrant undertakes that every prospectus (i) that is filed
pursuant to paragraph (1) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet
the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Act and is used in connection with
an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an
amendment to the Registration Statement and will not be used until such
amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be
deemed to be a new Registration Statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) Insofar as the indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to Directors, officers and controlling
persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise,
the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in
the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will
be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
II-6
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, THE
REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS
BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED, ON THE 20TH DAY OF
NOVEMBER 1998.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
INFORMIX CORPORATION
By: /s/ ROBERT J. FINOCCHIO
------------------------------------------
Robert J. Finocchio
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
</TABLE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL THESE PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Robert J. Finocchio and Jean-Yves Dexmier
and each of them, jointly and severally, as his attorneys-in-fact, each with
full power of substitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any and
all amendments to this Registration Statement, and to file the same, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
each said attorneys-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, THIS
REGISTRATION STATEMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE
CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE CAPACITY DATE
- ------------------------------ -------------------------- -------------------
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ ROBERT J. FINOCCHIO
- ------------------------------ Chairman of the Board and November 20, 1998
(Robert J. Finocchio) Chief Executive Officer
/s/ JEAN-YVES DEXMIER
- ------------------------------ Executive Vice President, November 20, 1998
(Jean-Yves Dexmier) Chief Financial Officer
/s/ LESLIE G. DENEND
- ------------------------------ Director November 20, 1998
(Leslie G. Denend)
/s/ ALBERT F. KNORP, JR.
- ------------------------------ Director November 20, 1998
(Albert F. Knorp, Jr.)
/s/ JAMES L. KOCH
- ------------------------------ Director November 20, 1998
(James L. Koch)
/s/ THOMAS A. MCDONNELL
- ------------------------------ Director November 20, 1998
(Thomas A. McDonnell)
/s/ GEORGE REYES
- ------------------------------ Director November 20, 1998
(George Reyes)
/s/ CYRIL J. YANSOUNI
- ------------------------------ Director November 20, 1998
(Cyril J. Yansouni)
</TABLE>
II-7
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 5.1
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 PAGE MILL ROAD
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94304-1050
TELEPHONE 650-493-9300 FACSIMILE 650-493-6811
November 20, 1998
Informix Corporation
4100 Bohannon Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
RE: REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-4
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be filed by
Informix Corporation (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on November 20, 1998 (the "Registration Statement") in connection with the
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of 8,043,057 shares
of the Company's Common Stock (the "Shares"). As your counsel in connection with
this transaction, we have examined the proceedings taken and are familiar with
the proceedings proposed to be taken by you in connection with the sale and
issuance of the Shares.
It is our opinion that the Shares will be, as or when issued and sold in the
manner described in the Registration Statement and in accordance with the
resolutions of the Company's Board of Directors and upon completion of the
proceedings being taken in order to permit such transactions to be carried out
in accordance with the securities laws of the various states where required,
legally and validly issued. It is our further opinion, subject to the
assumptions set forth in the preceding sentence, that the Shares will be fully
paid and nonassessable.
We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement, and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in the
Registration Statement, including the proxy statement/ prospectus constituting a
part thereof, and any amendment thereto.
Very truly yours,
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
/s/ WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
II-8
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-4) and related Prospectus of Informix Corporation
for the registration of shares of its common stock in connection with the
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of October 7, 1998, by and among
Informix Corporation, IC Merger Corporation, and Red Brick Systems, Inc., and to
the use of our report dated March 2, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Informix Corporation included in the Registration
Statement.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Informix
Corporation included in the Registration Statement. This schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
November 13, 1998
II-9
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.2
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Proxy Statement/ Prospectus included in the Registration Statement (Form S-4) of
Informix Corporation for the registration of shares of its common stock in
connection with the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of October 7,
1998, by and among Informix Corporation, IC Merger Corporation and Red Brick
Systems, Inc., and to the use of our report dated January 13, 1998 (except for
the second paragraph of Note 12, as to which the date is November 16, 1998),
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Red Brick Systems, Inc.
included in the Registration Statement.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Red Brick
Systems, Inc. included in the Registration Statement. This schedule is the
responsibility of Red Brick's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
November 16, 1998
II-10
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- -------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
3.1 (4) Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended
3.2 (a)(4) Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended
3.2 (b)(2) Amendment to Bylaws, dated June 19, 1998
3.2 (c)(2) Amendment to Bylaws, dated July 15, 1998
3.3 (5) Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
3.4 (6) Certificate of Designation of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
3.5 (6) Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
4.1 (7) First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of August 12, 1997, between the Registrant and
BankBoston N.A., including the form of Rights Certificate attached thereto as Exhibit A
4.2 (8) Amendment, dated as of November 17, 1997, to the First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement between
the Registrant and BankBoston, N.A.
5.1 (1) Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation regarding legality of the
securities being registered (See Page II-8)
10.1 (2) Form of Change of Control Agreement
10.2 (10) Form of Indemnity Agreement
10.3 (11) 1989 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan
10.4 (3) Amendment to the 1989 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan
10.5 (2) Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant's 1989 Outside Director's Stock
Option Plan
10.6 (12) 1986 Stock Option Plan, as amended
10.7 (13) 1994 Stock Option and Award Plan
10.8 (3) Form of Stock Option Agreement and Performance Award Agreement under the Registrant's 1994 Stock
Option and Award Plan
10.9 (13) Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant's 1994 Stock Option Plan
10.10(14) 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.11(2) Enrollment/Change Form under the Registrant's 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.12(15) Employment Agreement, dated July 18, 1997, between the Registrant and Robert J. Finocchio, Jr.
10.13(15) Offer of Employment Letter, dated September 18, 1997, from the Registrant to Wes Raffel
10.14(15) Offer of Employment Letter, dated September 24, 1997, from the Registrant to Jean-Yves Dexmier
10.15(2) Separation Agreement, dated April 18, 1987, between the Registrant and Ronald M. Alvarez
10.16(2) Separation Agreement, dated May 12, 1997, between the Registrant and Edwin C. Winder
10.17(16) Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 1989, between the Registrant and Phillip E. White
10.18(2) Contract of Employment, dated December 5, 1996, between the Registrant and Kenneth Coulter
10.19(2) Employment Letter Agreement, dated November 25, 1996, between the Registrant and Kenneth Coulter
10.20(5) Subscription Agreement, dated August 12, 1997, between the Company and Fletcher International Limited
10.21(17) Exchange Agreement, dated as of November 17, 1997, between the Company and Fletcher International
Limited
10.22(17) Amendment No. 1 to Subscription Agreement, dated as of November 17, 1997, between the Company and
Fletcher International Limited
10.23(6) Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 17, 1997, between the Company and the purchasers
listed therein
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- -------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
10.24(6) Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 17, 1997, between the Company and the purchasers
listed therein
10.25(9) Menlo Oaks Corporate Center Standard Business Lease, dated May 16, 1985, between the Registrant and
Amarok Bredero Partners for office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.26(9) Lease Amendment #1, dated July 2, 1986, between the Registrant and Amarok Bredero Partners for office
space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.27(18) Second Amendment to Lease, dated November 7, 1986 between the Registrant and Amarok Bredero Partners
for office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.28(19) Third Amendment to Lease, dated June 18, 1991, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.29(2) Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated June 30, 1997, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.30(10) Menlo Oaks Corporate Center Standard Business Lease, dated September 4, 1987 between the Registrant
and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P. for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.31(2) Side Letter Agreement, dated August 31, 1987, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.32(2) Side Letter Agreement, dated October 27, 1987, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.33(19) First Amendment to Lease, dated June 18, 1991, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.34(20) Second Amendment to Lease, dated July 17, 1992, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.35(2) Third Amendment to Lease, dated June 8, 1993 between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P. for
office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.36(21) Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated February 10, 1994, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners,
L.P. for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.37(2) Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated June 30, 1997 between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4300/4400 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.38(21) Menlo Oaks Corporate Center Standard Business Lease, dated February 10, 1994 between the Registrant
and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P. for office space at 4600/4700 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.39(21) First Amendment to Lease, dated March 17, 1994, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners, L.P.
for office space at 4600/4700 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.40(2) Second Amendment to Lease, dated September 22, 1994, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners,
L.P. for office space at 4600/4700 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.41(2) Third Amendment to Lease, dated December 28, 1994, between the Registrant and Menlo Oaks Partners,
L.P. for office space at 4600/4700 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, California
10.42(10) Office Lease, dated August 15, 1987, between the Registrant and Southlake Partners #1 for office
space at 15961 College Blvd. and 11170 Lakeview Avenue, Lenexa, Kansas
10.43(2) First Amendment to Office Lease, dated April 15, 1988, between the Registrant and Southlake Partners
#1 for office space at 15901 College Blvd., Lenexa, Kansas
10.44(2) Amendment to Office Lease, dated October 20, 1997, between the Registrant and Southlake Partners #1
for office space at 15901 College Blvd. (now 16011 College Blvd) Lenexa, Kansas
10.45(2) Office Lease, dated October 20, 1997, between the Registrant and Southlake Partners #1 for office
space at 11170 Lakeview Avenue, Lenexa, Kansas
10.46(2) Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, among Informix Software, Inc., certain
banks and other financial institutions that either now or in the future are parties to the
agreement, BankBoston, N.A. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- -------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
10.47(2) Pledge Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, by and between the Registrant and BankBoston, N.A.
10.48(2) Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1997, between Informix Software, Inc. and
BankBoston, N.A.
10.49(2) Continuing Guaranty, dated as of December 31, 1997, by the Registrant
10.50(3) 1997 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder
10.51(3) Offer of Employment Letter, dated January 23, 1998, from the Registrant to Susan T. Daniel
10.52(3) Offer of Employment Letter, dated January 19, 1998, from the Registrant to Gary Lloyd
10.53(3) Offer of Employment Letter, dated March 11, 1998, from the Registrant to Diane L. Fraiman
10.54(3) Office Lease, dated November 10, 1994, between WVP Income Plus III and Siebel Systems, L.P. (assigned
to Informix Corporation) for office space at 4005 Bohannon Drive, including addenda and amendments
thereto
10.55(3) Office Lease, dated April 10, 1995, between the Registrant and 3905 Bohannon Partners for office
space at 3905 Bohannon Drive, including addenda thereto
10.56(2) 1998 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder
16.1 (24) Letter regarding change in certifying accountants
21.1 (22) Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 (1) Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors (see page II-9)
23.2 (1) Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditor (see page II-10)
24.1 (1) Power of Attorney (see page II-7)
24.2 (1) Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation (included in Exhibit 5.1)
99.1 Form of Proxy Card for Red Brick Systems, Inc. Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held December
30, 1998.
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Filed herewith
(2) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrants'
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-43991)
(3) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
(4) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 1995
(5) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 25, 1997
(6) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 4, 1997
(7) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the amendment to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A (File No. 000-15325) filed
with the Commission on September 3, 1997
(8) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the amendment to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A (File No. 000-15325) filed
with the Commission on December 3, 1997
(9) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-8006)
(10) Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with the Registrant's annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988
(11) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-31116)
(12) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos: 33-22862, 33-31117 and 33-506-10)
<PAGE>
(13) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31369) filed with the
Commission on July 16, 1997
(14) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31371) filed with the
Commission on July 16, 1997
(15) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 1997
(16) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989
(17) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 2, 1997
(18) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1986
(19) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991
(20) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992
(21) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with Registrant's annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993
(22) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
(23) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's annual
report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997
(24) Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant's report on Form
8-K/A filed with the Commission on June 2, 1998
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1
PROXY PROXY
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
485 ALBERTO WAY, LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA 95032
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 30, 1998
The undersigned hereby appoints Christopher G. Erickson, Chairman of
the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Red Brick Systems, Inc.
(the "Company"), and Kristi L. Smith, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary of the Company, and each of them proxies for the undersigned,
each with the full power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby
authorizes each of them, to represent and to vote as designated on this Proxy
Card, all the shares of Common Stock of the Company held of record by the
undersigned on November 19, 1998 and entitled to be voted at the Special
Meeting of Stockholders to be held at Hyatt Rickeys, 4219 El Camino Real,
Palo Alto, California, at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, December 30, 1998, or any
adjournment or postponement thereof.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE MERGER PROPOSAL.
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY PROMPTLY
IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE.)
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
PLEASE MARK VOTE IN OVAL IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER USING DARK INK ONLY / /
1. Approval of the merger agreement between Red Brick Systems, Inc. and
Informix Corporation and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the
merger of Red Brick Systems, Inc. with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Informix
Corporation, as set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus (the
"Merger Proposal").
/ / For / / Against / / Abstain
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed
herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, this Proxy
will be voted FOR the Merger Proposal.
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other
business as may properly come before the Special Meeting.
The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of Special Meeting of
Stockholders and of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
Dated: ____________________,1998
Signature(s) _________________________________
_________________________________
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name or names appear hereon. Joint owners should
each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in
full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
