OFFICE DEPOT INC
8-K, 1998-08-14
MISCELLANEOUS SHOPPING GOODS STORES
Previous: ARGONAUT GROUP INC, 10-Q, 1998-08-14
Next: JANEX INTERNATIONAL INC, NT 10-Q, 1998-08-14



======================================================================





                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549



                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT
                        Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



      Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  August 13, 1998



                              Office Depot, Inc.                  
            (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



      Delaware                       1-10948                 59-2663954   
   (State or Other                 (Commission             (IRS Employer 
   Jurisdiction of                 File Number)           Identification 
    Incorporation)                                             Number)





    2200 Old Germantown Road                                   33445     
      Delray Beach, Florida                                  (Zip Code)
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)  
             




                               (561) 266-4800                        
             (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


                                     None                                     
         (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)






======================================================================<PAGE>
ITEM 5.   Other Events.

          On August 13, 1998, Office Depot, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Office Depot"), reached an agreement in principle for the settlement of the
action entitled Szymczak v. Helford et al., Case No. BC191390, pending in the
Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles (the
"Action").  The settlement agreement provides that the measures set forth
below shall be taken in connection with the merger (the "Merger") of VK
Acquisition Corp., a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Office Depot ("Merger Sub"), with and into Viking Office Products, Inc., a
California corporation ("Viking").  The terms of the Merger are set forth in
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") dated as of May 18,
1998 among Office Depot, Merger Sub and Viking.  

     1.   Viking will cause its investment bankers, Merrill Lynch, Pierce
Fenner & Smith Incorporated and SBC Warburg Dillon Read Inc. to update each
investment banker's written opinion to the Viking board of directors, dated
May 17, 1998, regarding the fairness of the merger consideration to Viking
stockholders from a financial point of view.  The fairness opinions will be
dated as of July 23, 1998, the date on which the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus on Form S-4 (the "Proxy Statement") was filed with the
Securities & Exchange Commission, or such other date as the parties may
agree.  

     2.   The Merger Agreement provides that Viking shall pay Office Depot a
termination fee (the "Termination Fee") and Office Depot may terminate the
Merger Agreement in the event that (i) the Viking stockholders do not approve
the Merger, (ii) the Viking board of directors withdraws or modifies its
recommendation that the Merger be approved, (iii) after receipt by Viking of
an acquisition proposal from a party other than Office Depot, Office Depot
requests in writing that the Viking board of directors reconfirms its
recommendation of the Merger and the Viking board fails to do so, (iv) the
Viking board of directors has recommended an alternative transaction in which
an entity other than Office Depot would acquire more than 25% of the
outstanding shares of Viking common stock or would acquire control of
Viking's assets, (v) a tender offer or exchange for 25% or more of the
outstanding shares of Viking common stock is commenced and the Viking board
of directors recommends that the Viking stockholders tender their shares or
fails to recommend that the stockholders reject such tender or exchange
offer, or (vi) Viking fails to call or hold a special meeting of stockholders
by November 30, 1998.  The Termination Fee is $30 million and, if an
alternative transaction described in clause (iv) above is consummated with
twelve months after the termination of the Merger Agreement, an additional
$50 million.  Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the parties to the
Merger Agreement have entered into an amendment to the Merger Agreement that
provides that the Termination Fee payable by Viking is reduced by 5% to
$28,500,000, and $47,500,000, respectively.

     3.   The parties to the Action will attempt in good faith to negotiate
and execute the stipulation of settlement and any other documents required to
obtain the approval of the settlement.  The stipulation of settlement will
expressly provide that the defendants in the Action continue to deny that
they violated any law and are settling the Action to avoid the expense of
further litigation.  The parties will use their best efforts to obtain final
court approval of the settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the Action. 
The consummation of the settlement is subject to the completion by plaintiff
of discovery and the drafting of the stipulation of settlement.  
<PAGE>
     4.   The settlement will not be binding until the Merger is consummated,
an appropriate stipulation of settlement has been signed, and the dismissal
of the Action with prejudice and without costs other than reasonable out-of-
pocket attorneys fees and expenses not exceeding $300,000 has been obtained. 
Office Depot or Viking will pay plaintiff's counsel such attorneys' fees and
expenses as may be awarded by the court, and will not oppose the application
for award of such fees and expenses, up to $300,000.  

          The foregoing summary of the settlement agreement, the Merger
Agreement and the amendment to the Merger Agreement is qualified in its
entirety by reference to (i) the Merger Agreement, which is filed as Annex I 
to the Proxy Statement and which is incorporated herein by reference, (ii) 
the Amendment to the Merger Agreement, which is filed as an exhibit hereto 
and (iii) the Memorandum of Understanding, which also is filed as an Exhibit 
hereto.


ITEM 7.   Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits  


          (a) - (b)  Not Applicable.

          (c)  Exhibits.

          2.1  Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 18, 1998 among
               Office Depot, Inc., VK Acquisition Corp. and Viking Office
               Products, Inc. (filed as Annex I to the Joint Proxy
               Statement/Prospectus on Form S-4 dated July 22, 1998 and
               incorporated by reference herein). 

          2.2  First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of 
               August 13, 1998, among Office Depot, Inc., VK
               Acquisition Corp. and Viking Office Products, Inc.

          2.3  Memorandum of Understanding, dated August 13, 1998, among
               counsel for plaintiff Thaddeus Szymczak and the Class, Office
               Depot, Inc., Viking Office Products, Inc., Irwin Helford, M.
               Bruce Nelson, Lee A. Ault, III, Neil R. Austrian, Charles P.
               Durkin, Jr. and Joan D. Manley.  
           
          99.1 Text of joint press release dated August 14, 1998, issued by
               Office Depot, Inc. and Viking Office Products, Inc.

<PAGE>
                                  SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


Dated:  August 13, 1998   By:  /s/ Barry Goldstein               
                               ------------------------------
                          Name:   Barry Goldstein
                          Title:  Executive Vice President 
                                  and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number                     Description of Exhibit

    2.1        Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 18, 1998 among
               Office Depot, Inc., VK Acquisition Corp. and Viking Office 
               Products, Inc. (filed as Annex I to the Joint Proxy Statement/
               Prospectus on Form S-4 dated July 22, 1998 and incorporated by
               reference herein).

    2.2        First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of 
               August 13, 1998, among Office Depot, Inc., VK
               Acquisition Corp. and Viking Office Products, Inc.

    2.3        Memorandum of Understanding, dated August 13, 1998, among 
               counsel for plaintiff Thaddeus Szymczak and the Class, 
               Office Depot, Inc., Viking Office Products, Inc., Irwin Helford, 
               M. Bruce Neslon, Lee A. Ault, III, Neil R. Austrian, Charles P.
               Durkin, Jr. and Joan D. Manley. 

   99.1        Text of joint press release dated August 14, 1998, issued by 
               Office Depot, Inc. and Viking Office Products, Inc.



                                                                   Exhibit 2.2

                FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER


          First Amendment (the "First Amendment"), dated as of August 13,
1998, by and among Office Depot, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Depot"), VK
Acquisition Corp., a California corporation and a direct, wholly-owned
subsidiary of Depot ("Sub"), and Viking Office Products, Inc., a California
corporation ("Viking") to Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger
Agreement"), dated May 18, 1998, between Depot, Sub and Viking.

                                   RECITALS

          The Board of Directors of each of Depot, Sub and Viking have
approved the terms of this First Amendment to the Merger Agreement.  Depot,
Sub and Viking desire to enter into this First Amendment, and the proposed
First Amendment is in compliance with the terms of Section 8.04 of the Merger
Agreement relating to amendments to the Merger Agreement.  This amendment
precedes approval by the stockholders of Viking and Depot of the matters
presented in connection with the Merger (as defined in the Merger Agreement).

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
agreements herein set forth, the parties hereby agree as follows:

                                   ARTICLE I

                 CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT

          Section 1.1 Amendment of Section 3.17 and the Viking Disclosure
Schedule.

          (a)  Section 3.17 of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended to
delete the word "Neither" in the first line thereof and to substitute in its
place "Except as disclosed in Section 3.17 of the Viking Disclosure Schedule,
neither".

          (b)  The Viking Disclosure Schedule to the Merger Agreement is
hereby amended to add the following to the end of such schedule:

                                "Schedule 3.17

          1.  Employees of Viking Direct France, S.A.R.L., a subsidiary of
Viking, are party to a collective bargaining agreement.

          2.  Employees of Viking Office Products Pty Limited are members of
a labor union as prescribed by Australian law.  Such union activity is
ordinary course for like businesses in Australia."

          Section 1.2.  Amendment of Section 8.03(c).  Section 8.03(c) of the
Merger Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

          "(c) Upon the earliest to occur of the following events:

               (i)  the termination of this Agreement by Depot pursuant to
     Section 8.01(d), if prior to the Viking Stockholders' Meeting a proposal
<PAGE>
     for an Alternative Transaction (as defined below) reasonably capable of
     being performed involving Viking or which is a Superior Proposal shall
     have been made; or

              (ii)  the termination of this Agreement by Depot pursuant to
     Section 8.01(e),

Viking shall pay to Depot a termination fee of $28,500,000 and, in the event
an Alternative Transaction involving Viking is consummated within 12 months
after such termination, Viking shall pay to Depot an additional fee of
$47,500,000.

          Viking's payment of a termination fee pursuant to this subsection
shall be the sole and exclusive remedy of Depot against Viking and any of its
Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents,
advisors or other representatives with respect to the occurrences giving rise
to such payment (other than as set forth in the Viking Stock Option
Agreement); provided such limit shall not limit liability for a willful
breach of this Agreement."

                                  ARTICLE 11

                                 MISCELLANEOUS

          Section 2.1 Terms and Conditions.  Except as specifically modified
herein, all other terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.

          Section 2.2 Binding, Effect of Amendment to Merger Agreement.  This
First Amendment is an amendment to the Merger Agreement and, as provided
therein, will be binding on all the parties thereto.

          Section 2.3 Counterparts.  This First Amendment may be executed in
two or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same
agreement and shall become effective when two or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties, it being
understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart.

                           (signature page follows)
<PAGE>
          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First
Amendment to be signed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized
as of the date first written above.

Office Depot, Inc.


                                               By:  /s/ David I. Fuente   
                                                    ---------------------
                                               Name:  David I. Fuente
                                               Title: Chairman of the Board


                                               By:  /s/ Barry J. Goldstein
                                                    ----------------------
                                               Name:  Barry J. Goldstein
                                               Title: Secretary


                                               VK Acquisition Corp.


                                               By:  /s/ David I. Fuente
                                                    ----------------------    
                                               Name:  David I. Fuente
                                               Title: President


                                               By:  /s/ Barry J. Goldstein
                                                    ----------------------
                                               Name:  Barry J. Goldstein
                                               Title: Secretary


                                               Viking Office Products, Inc.


                                               By:   /s/ Irwin Helford
                                                    ----------------------
                                               Name:  Irwin Helford
                                               Title: Chairman of the Board


                                               By:  /s/ Charlotte Wiethoff
                                                    ----------------------
                                               Name:  Charlotte Wiethoff
                                               Title: Secretary



                                                             Exhibit 2.3
                    MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING


          The parties to the action entitled Szymczak v. Helford et al., Case

No. BC191390, pending in the Superior Court of the State of California,

County of Los Angeles (the "Action") have reached an agreement in principle

for the settlement of the Action on the terms and subject to the conditions

set forth below:

          1.   As a result of the negotiations between the undersigned

attorneys for the parties, the following measures shall be taken in

connection with the proposed merger provided for in the Agreement and Plan of

Merger, dated as of May 18, 1998, among VK Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned

subsidiary of Office Depot, Inc. ("Office Depot"), and Viking Office

Products, Inc. ("Viking"), (the "Merger Agreement"):

               a.   Viking will cause its investment bankers, Merrill Lynch,

Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch") and SBC Warburg Dillon

Read Inc. ("Warburg Dillon Read") (collectively, the "financial advisors") to

update each's written opinion to the Viking board of directors, dated May 17,

1998 (collectively, the "fairness opinion"), in which Merrill Lynch and

Warburg Dillon Read each opined that as of that date the exchange ratio

provided for in the Merger Agreement of one share of Office Depot common

stock for each share of Viking common stock was fair from a financial point

of view to the holders of shares of Viking common stock.  The updated

fairness opinion will reflect the financial advisors' opinion of the fairness

of the exchange ratio from a financial point of view to the holders of shares

of Viking common stock as of the date the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus on

Form S-4 (the "Proxy Statement") was filed with the United States Securities

Exchange Commission in final form (July 22, 1998), or such other date as the

parties may agree.  Viking will promptly publicly disclose through a press
<PAGE>
release the conclusion reached by its financial advisors in the updated

fairness opinion;

               b.   The Merger Agreement will be modified to provide that the

termination fee ("Termination Fee") payable, under certain circumstances, by

Viking to Office Depot pursuant to Section 8.03 of the Merger Agreement shall

be reduced by five percent.  Viking will promptly disclose through a press

release the reduction in the Termination Fee.

          2.   The parties to the Action will attempt in good faith to agree

upon and execute a Stipulation of Settlement and such other documentation as

may be required in order to obtain the approval of the California State Court

of the settlement and the dismissal of the Action upon the terms set forth in

this Memorandum of Understanding.  The Stipulation of Settlement will

expressly provide, inter alia, that Defendants in the Action have denied, and

continue to deny, that they have committed or have threatened to commit any

violations of law and that they are entering into the Stipulation because the

proposed settlement would eliminate the burden and expense of further

litigation.

          3.   The parties to the Action will present the settlement to the

California State Court for approval following appropriate notice to the class

members on whose behalf the Action was instituted, and will use their best

efforts to obtain final court approval of the settlement, and the dismissal

with prejudice of the Action, as against the named plaintiff and the class

members on whose behalf the Action was brought.

          4.   The consummation of the settlement is subject to the

completion by Plaintiff of such discovery as is deemed necessary by

Plaintiff's Counsel (subject to appropriate objections), the drafting and

execution of an appropriate Stipulation of Settlement and such other

documentation as may be required to obtain final court approval of the

settlement and the dismissal of the Action with prejudice as to all claims
<PAGE>
asserted therein as against the named Plaintiff and the class of Viking

shareholders on whose behalf the Action was brought and without costs to any

party [except as provided for in paragraph 6 below].

          5.   The Settlement contemplated by this Memorandum of

Understanding will not be binding upon any party until the transaction

referred to in paragraph 1 is consummated, discovery referred to in paragraph

4 is completed, an appropriate Stipulation of Settlement has been signed,

final court approval of the settlement and the dismissal of the Action with

prejudice and without costs (except as provided in paragraph 6 below) has

been obtained.  This Memorandum of Understanding shall be null and void and

of no force and effect should any of these conditions not be met or should

Plaintiff's Counsel determine based upon discovery or otherwise, that the

settlement is not fair and reasonable and, in that event, this Memorandum of

Understanding shall not be admissible in any proceeding or be deemed to

prejudice in any way the positions of the parties with respect to any action.

          6.   Plaintiff's Counsel in the Action intend to apply to the

California State Court for an award of attorneys' fees and reasonable out-of-

pocket disbursements in an aggregate amount not to exceed $300,000 (together,

the "Fees").  Subject to the terms and conditions of this Memorandum of

Understanding and the Stipulation of Settlement contemplated hereby, Office

Depot or Viking and/or their successors in interest will pay Plaintiff's

Counsel the Fees, up to such amount of $300,000 as may be awarded by the

California State Court.  Office Depot and Viking and/or their successors in

interest shall pay the costs and expenses relating to providing notice of the

settlement to members of the plaintiff class in the Action.  Office Depot and

Viking and/or their successors in interest agree not to oppose Plaintiff's

Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of

expenses to the California State Court.
<PAGE>
          7.   The parties shall agree to extensions of time with respect to

pleadings and other court filings as are appropriate in the context of this

agreement in principle.

          8.   This Memorandum of Understanding may be executed in any number

of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties hereto had executed

the same document.  All such counterparts shall be construed together and

shall constitute one instrument.

Dated:    August __, 1998


                                  MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES
                                         & LERACH LLP


                                  By:  ______________________________
                                       Counsel for Plaintiff Thaddeus
                                       Szymczak and the Class
                                       355 South Grand Avenue
                                       Suite 4170
                                       Los Angeles, CA 90071
                                       Telephone:  (213) 617-9007
                                                  and
                                       One Pennsylvania Plaza
                                       New York, NY 10119-0165
                                       Telephone:  (212) 594-5300
<PAGE>
                                  BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD & LIFSHITZ


                                  By:                                        
                                       Counsel for Plaintiff Thaddeus
                                       Szymczak and the Class
                                       274 Madison Avenue
                                       New York, NY 10016
                                       Telephone:  (212) 779-1414


                                  SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT

                                  By:  _________________________        
                                       Counsel for Defendant,
                                       Office Depot, Inc.
                                       101 Universal City Plaza
                                       Suite 852
                                       Universal City, CA 91608
                                       Telephone:  (818) 755-7000
                                                      and
                                       425 Lexington Avenue
                                       New York, NY 10017
                                       Telephone:  (212) 455-2000


                                  LATHAM & WATKINS


                                  By:                                        
                                       Counsel for Defendants,
                                       Viking Office Products Inc.,
                                       Irwin Helford, M. Bruce Nelson,
                                       Lee A. Ault, III, Neil R. Austrian, 
                                       Charles P. Durkin, Jr., and Joan D.
                                       Manley
                                       633 West Fifth Street
                                       Suite 4000
                                       Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007
                                       Telephone:  (213) 485-1234



                                                                  Exhibit 99.1


                              PRESS RELEASE



Office Depot Contacts                        Viking Office Products Contacts
- ---------------------                        -------------------------------
Barry Goldstein                              Frank R. Jarc
Executive Vice President & CFO               Executive Vice President & CFO
561/265-4237                                 310/225-4466

Gary Schweikhart                             Charlotte Wiethoff
Vice President Public Relations              Vice President Administration & 
Secretary                                    Secretary
561/265-4399                                 310/225-4263


              Office Depot, Inc. and Viking Office Products, Inc.
                         Settle Shareholder Litigation


AUGUST 14, 1998 (Delray Beach, FL and Los Angeles, CA) - OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
(NYSE: ODP) and VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. (Nasdaq: VKNG) today announced
the settlement of Viking shareholder litigation in connection with the
companies' May 18, 1998 agreement to merge into a single company.  

On August 13, 1998, Office Depot, Viking and the individual defendants,
reached an agreement in principle for the settlement of the action entitled
Szymczak v. Helford et al., Case No. BC191390, pending in the Superior Court
of the State of California, County of Los Angeles.  The terms of the
settlement agreement are set forth in a Form 8-K filed today with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, which is attached.  

Various statements in this release may constitute forward-looking statements. 
Actual results may differ materially from those indicated as a result of
various important factors, which are discussed in Viking's and Office Depot's
most recent Annual Reports or Forms 10-K and 10-Q, which are on file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission