AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVI LTD PARTNERSHIP
PRER14A, 1997-11-21
REAL ESTATE
Previous: MUNICIPAL INVT TR FD INSURED SERIES 309 DEFINED ASSET FUNDS, 497, 1997-11-21
Next: AMERICREDIT CORP, SC 13D/A, 1997-11-21



                              

                              

                    SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
                                
            PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
             OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                
                                
Filed by the Registrant                     [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  [ ] 

Check the appropriate box:

[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by 
    Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to  240.14a-11(c) or 240.14a-12

          AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
        (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the
                           Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed 
    pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
    the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 5) Total fee paid:


[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
    Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
    offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing
    by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
    date of its filing.

 1) Amount Previously Paid:

 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 3) Filing Party:

 4) Date Filed:
   
          AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                        CONSENT STATEMENT
                                
    For Amendments to Limited Partnership Agreement to Permit
Reinvestment of Sales Proceeds and Change Unit Repurchase Provisions

     THIS CONSENT STATEMENT IS BEING MAILED TO INVESTORS ON OR ABOUT
DECEMBER  15,  1997.  TO BE COUNTED, A PROPERLY SIGNED CONSENT  FORM
MUST  BE  RECEIVED BY THE MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER AT 1300 MINNESOTA
WORLD  TRADE CENTER, 30 EAST 7TH STREET, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA  55101,
ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 30, 1998.

      AEI  Fund Management XVI, Inc., the Managing General  Partner,
and Robert P. Johnson, the Individual General Partner (together, the
"General  Partners") of AEI Real Estate Fund XVI Limited Partnership
(the  "Fund") are recommending two amendments (the "Amendments")  to
the Fund's Limited Partnership Agreement (the "Fund Agreement"):

     (a)      An  amendment  to  change  Section  5.4  of  the  Fund
       Agreement  (the "Reinvestment Amendment")  to allow  proceeds
       from  sale of Fund properties to be reinvested in replacement
       properties  until final liquidation of the  Fund.   The  Fund
       Agreement currently requires that reinvestments end  November
       6, 1997.
     
     (b)     An  amendment to Section 7.7 of the Fund Agreement (the
       "Repurchase  Amendment") to allow Unit repurchases  to  occur
       more   frequently  (quarterly)  and  to  allow  the  Managing
       General Partner to establish a repurchase price that will  be
       higher than the repurchase price under the current formula.

      The  General Partners believe that the Fund should be able  to
take  advantage  of  property sales, when  available  at  attractive
prices, without depleting the capital base of the Fund.  Approval of
the  Reinvestment Amendment would allow the Managing General Partner
to  continue  to  reinvest proceeds from the sale of  properties  in
replacement  properties until final liquidation  of  the  Fund.  The
General  Partners also believe that the Fund's current  formula  for
determining  the  purchase price of Units  no  longer  reflects  the
market  value  of Units, and that Investors should be  permitted  to
present  Units  for repurchase more frequently than once  per  year.
Approval  of  the  Repurchase Amendment would provide  an  alternate
valuation  formula that the General Partners believe more accurately
reflects the pricing of Units in the secondary market.  Accordingly,
THE   GENERAL  PARTNERS  RECOMMEND  A  VOTE  "FOR"   BOTH   PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS.

     THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS WILL AFFECT YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE FUND
IN A NUMBER OF WAYS AND INVOLVE A NUMBER OF RISKS THAT ARE DISCUSSED
IN  MORE  DETAIL UNDER THE CAPTION SUMMARY--RISKS OF THE  AMENDMENTS,
INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING:

     If the Reinvestment Amendment is approved:

bullet   Distributions of some sales proceeds will be delayed.

bullet   The reinvestments could cause extension of the life of  the
         Fund.

bullet   The  interests of the General Partners in approval  of  the
         Reinvestment  Amendment may conflict with  the  interests  of
         Investors.

bullet   Properties in which proceeds are reinvested will be subject
         to  many  of the same risks of nonperformance as the original
         properties.

bullet   Investors  will  not  be  able to  review  in  advance  the
         properties in which proceeds are reinvested.
     
     If the Repurchase Amendment is approved:
     
bullet   Limitations  in the Fund Agreement on the number  of  Units
         that  will  be repurchased will not be changed and there  may
         be  circumstances under which Fund cannot,  or  is  obligated
         not to, make repurchases.

bullet   Distributions to investors may decrease during the years of
         repurchase.

bullet   There  can be no assurance that the new formula price  will
         pay an Investor the market value of the Units.
      
      INVESTORS WILL NOT HAVE APPRAISAL OR DISSENTERS RIGHTS AND
  THEREFORE WILL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE THE FUND TO PAY THEM
  THE VALUE OF THEIR UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNER INTEREST IF THEY
  DISAGREE WITH THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS.                           

                                  -2-    

                             SUMMARY

The following summary is qualified by the more detailed discussion
set forth herein.
   
The Amendments

      The  General Partners are proposing an amendment to  Section
5.4  of  the  Fund Agreement (the "Reinvestment Amendment").   The
Reinvestment  Amendment will eliminate the  requirement  that  the
Fund  distribute  all proceeds from sale of properties  and  allow
reinvestment of such proceeds until final liquidation of the Fund.
Even if the Reinvestment Amendment is approved, however, most,  if
not all, gain from sales activity would continue to be distributed
to Investors.  The Reinvestment Amendment is intended primarily to
allow  the  Fund  to reinvest the portion of sales  proceeds  that
constitutes   the   original  investment  in  a  property,   while
distributing  the  "gain" (the excess of sales proceeds  over  the
original   investment).    Because   the   portion   of   proceeds
representing   the   original  investment  will   be   reinvested,
distributions  of sales proceeds will initially  decrease  if  the
Reinvestment  Amendment  is approved and  will  be  delayed  until
liquidation  of the Partnership. See "Reasons for and  Effects  of
the Amendments--Reinvestment Amendment."

      The  General  Partners are also proposing  an  amendment  to
Section  7.7  of the Fund Agreement (the "Repurchase  Amendment").
The  Repurchase Amendment will provide an alternative formula  for
valuation  of  Units of limited partner interest in the  Fund  for
purposes of the Fund Agreement's Unit repurchase provisions.   The
Repurchase Amendment is intended to increase the repurchase  price
over the existing formula, but the existing formula will remain as
an alternative, and Investors will be entitled to the higher price
yielded  by  either formula.  The Repurchase Amendment  will  also
increase the frequency of presentment opportunities from once  per
year to quarterly, commencing in calendar 1998.  See "Reasons  For
and Effects of the Amendments--Repurchase Amendment."

Reasons for the Amendments

      The  Fund may sell properties prior to final liquidation  of
the  Fund  due to favorable market conditions, exercise  of  lease
purchase options, tenant restructuring or other reasons.  Although
the  General Partners cannot guarantee returns, they believe  that
the  Fund can generate favorable returns to Investors through  the
acquisition  of  additional properties that can be  resold.   They
believe  that  the Fund should be in a position  to  reinvest  the
proceeds  from these and other sales into replacement  net  leased
properties.

      The  General Partners believe that the current  formula  for
determining the purchase price of Units under Section 7.7  of  the
Fund  Agreement no longer reflects a Unit valuation  that  closely
approximates  market  value.   The  current  formula   bases   the
repurchase  price  on  the  initial  capital  contribution  of  an
investor  less  50%  of distributions to the  investor.   The  new
formula  will provide an alternate valuation based on 90%  of  the
"net  value"  of  the Fund, after taking into account  the  market
value of units, the present value of future net cash flow from the
Fund  and  such other factors as the General Partners  may  apply.
The  provisions  of Section 7.7, as proposed to be  amended,  will
provide  that the formula yielding the highest value will control.
In addition, the new provisions will provide for the repurchase of
Units quarterly rather than once per year, thus increasing,  to  a
limited extent, the liquidity of an investment in the Units.

Benefits to Insiders

      The  General  Partners  may benefit  from  the  Reinvestment
Amendment  in  several respects. If the Reinvestment Amendment  is
approved,  the  Fund will retain more properties under  management
and the General Partners will receive more reimbursements from the
Fund.   Further, to the extent funds are reinvested and properties
perform  well,  the  likelihood that  the  General  Partners  will
receive  a  higher percentage of cash flow may be  increased.  See
"Reasons  for  the Amendments--The Reinvestment Amendment--Interests
of the General Partners."

Voting/Units Held by General Partners

      Each  Amendment will require the affirmative vote of holders
of a majority of the outstanding Units. There were 13,879.40 Units
outstanding at December 1, 1997.  The General Partners  and  their
affiliates held a total of 18 Units as of such date and intend  to
vote  all  such  Units  in  favor of the  Amendments.   See  "Unit
Ownership of Principal Holders and General Partners."        
                                   -3-
Risks of the Amendments
   
Reinvestment Amendment:

     1.Deferred Cash Distributions.  Rather than distributing  all
       net  cash  proceeds on sale of a property, the Reinvestment
       Amendment  will  allow  the Fund (if the  General  Partners
       determine, in their discretion, that it is advantageous  to
       the  Fund)  to  reinvest such proceeds  in  new  properties
       (subject  to  a  continuing  obligation  to  distribute  to
       Investors  cash  proceeds adequate to pay  the  income  tax
       liability   generated   by   sales   of   property).    The
       distribution  of  cash that is reinvested will  be  delayed
       until the Fund is finally liquidated.
     
     2.Risk  of  Extension  of  Fund Life.  The  General  Partners
       intend  to  reinvest sales proceeds in new properties  that
       could  be  sold again within a few years.  The Reinvestment
       Amendment  could render more difficult the  final  sale  of
       properties within the original intended life of  the  Fund.
       The  General Partners intend to commence liquidation of the
       Fund  by the year 2001, although the sale of any particular
       property   may  be  delayed  based  on  market  and   other
       conditions.   The  Reinvestment Amendment  could  have  the
       effect of extending the life of the Fund for several  years
       and  delaying the ultimate distribution of its assets.  The
       Fund  Agreement provides that the Fund must be  liquidated,
       in any event, by the year 2038 (an arbitrary date).
     
     3.Real  Estate  Risks  on  Reinvestment.   Proceeds  will  be
       reinvested  in new triple net leased commercial  properties
       that  are subject to the same risks of performance  as  the
       properties originally acquired by the Fund.  The  value  of
       real  estate is subject to a number of factors  beyond  the
       control   of   the   Fund,  including   national   economic
       conditions,  changes in interest rates, governmental  rules
       and  regulations  and  competition  from  other  forms   of
       financing.   If adverse changes in these general conditions
       negatively  affect market value, the final  disposition  of
       the  property and the distribution of cash to Investors may
       be  delayed  or the disposition may result in  a  loss,  or
       both.   The  value  of properties in which  the  Fund  will
       invest  will be affected by the financial condition of  the
       tenant.   If  a  tenant  is unable  to  perform  its  lease
       obligations, the Fund may not be able to sell the  property
       or  may be forced to sell the property at a loss.  Further,
       in  the  event of a bankruptcy of a tenant, the Fund  might
       not  be  able  to obtain possession of the property  for  a
       considerable period of time.  See "Reasons For and  Effects
       of the Amendments--Repurchase Amendment."
     
     4.Undesignated  Properties.  Investors will not  be  able  to
       review  in  advance the properties in which proceeds  would
       be reinvested.
     
     5.Conflicts  of  Interest.   The  interests  of  the  General
       Partners  in proposing the Reinvestment Amendment  conflict
       with  those of Investors because the General Partners  will
       receive  more reimbursements from the Fund if proceeds  are
       reinvested  than they will if proceeds are not  reinvested.
       The  Managing  General Partner is reimbursed at  its  cost,
       which   costs  includes  a  portion  of  salaries  of   its
       personnel  and other overhead, for services it provides  to
       the  Fund.   Such Reimbursements will decrease if  cash  is
       distributed  and fewer properties are under  management  in
       the   Fund.    See   "Reasons  For  and  Effects   of   the
       Amendments--Reinvestment Amendment--Interests of the General
       Partner in the Reinvestment Amendment."
     
Repurchase Amendment:

     1.Limitation  on  Repurchases.  The Fund is not  required  to
       repurchase  in  any  calendar  year  Units  aggregating  in
       excess of 5% of the Units outstanding in such year, and  is
       not  required to repurchase Units if doing so would  impair
       the  Fund's ability to continue operations.  The Repurchase
       Amendment will not alter these limitations.  There  may  be
       circumstances under which Fund revenues and borrowings  are
       insufficient to fully fund such repurchases.             
                                   -4-     
   
     2.Valuation   of  Units.   Although  the  Fund's   management
       believes that the new alternative repurchase price  formula
       will  generally yield a higher Unit price than the existing
       formula,  and  Investors  will be entitled  to  the  higher
       repurchase price determined under either formula, there  is
       no   assurance  that  either  formula  price  will  pay  an
       Investor  the  market value of the Investor's  Units.   The
       repurchase price  will be based on the value of the  Fund's
       assets  under the new formula, which will in turn be  based
       on  a  number of factors that are somewhat judgmental.   To
       the  extent  the General Partners overvalue the Units  that
       are   repurchased  through  such  formula,  the   remaining
       Investors and the General Partners will be disadvantaged.
     
     3.Effects  on Distributions.  The Fund will repurchase  Units
       out   of   capital  available  for  distribution  and   the
       Partnership interests represented by the repurchased  Units
       will effectively be allocated among, and will increase  the
       percentage  interests  of,  remaining  partners.    To  the
       extent  that  the  amendment  causes  more  Units   to   be
       repurchased,  it  may,  in  the  short-term,  decrease  the
       amount of distributions to Investors.
     
General:

      No  Appraisal Rights.  Investors will not have appraisal  or
dissenters  rights  as  a result of the Amendments.   Accordingly,
Investors  that  disagree with the Amendments will  not  have  the
right  to require the Fund to pay out the value of their Units  of
limited  partnership interest.  Instead, the  Amendments  will  be
effective with respect to all Investors if approved by holders  of
a  majority  of  the  Units  and a dissenting  Investor  would  be
required  to find a different method of disposing of  his  or  her
units, such as through the Fund's repurchase plan, or to hold  his
or her units until liquidation of the Fund.
                                
                                
            REASONS FOR AND EFFECTS OF THE AMENDMENTS
                                
Reinvestment Amendment

      General.   If Investors approve the Reinvestment  Amendment,
the  Fund  will  have  the opportunity, upon  the  sale  or  other
disposition of properties such as the properties described  below,
to  reinvest  the  Net Proceeds of Sale in additional  triple  net
leased  properties.   Under the terms of  the  Fund  Agreement  as
amended  in  1992,  the  Net Proceeds of Sale  from  the  sale  of
properties  cannot  be  reinvested after  November  6,  1997.   By
consenting  to the Reinvestment Amendment, Investors would  permit
the  Fund to acquire new properties with the Net Proceeds of  Sale
from  the  sale  of  the properties (net of any  distributions  to
Investors) that occur prior to the final liquidation of the  Fund.
Because  proceeds  will  be  reinvested,  distributions  of  sales
proceeds  will  be  decreased  until further  liquidation  of  the
properties  in  which  the  proceeds  are  reinvested,  or   until
liquidation of the Fund.

     The Reinvestment Amendment is not intended to extend the life
of the Fund.  The Prospectus pursuant to which the Units were sold
indicated  that  the General Partners expected that  most  of  the
properties would be sold or refinanced eight to twelve years after
acquisition. The Fund properties described below were acquired  in
1987,  1988  and 1990 and it remains the intention of the  General
Partners to commence liquidation of the Fund, depending on  market
conditions  and the benefits of continued ownership, by  the  year
2001.

      The Reinvestment Amendment is being proposed for a number of
reasons, including the following:

bullet   Without the Reinvestment Amendment, the Managing  General
         Partner  will be required to forgo all attractive proposals
         it  receives to sell Fund properties if it desires to avoid
         depleting the Fund's capital base.
     
bullet   If  the  Reinvestment Amendment is approved, the Fund will
         be  able  to  (i) take advantage of any favorable  purchase
         proposals  that are presented, (ii) seek out such proposals
         when  market conditions are favorable,  and  (iii)  retain
         adequate  capital  in the Fund to work  toward  the  Fund's
         investment objectives.          

                                   -5-
        
bullet   Without the Reinvestment Amendment, if a property is sold
         prior  to final liquidation of the Fund, the Fund's capital
         base,  and therefore its ability to generate the  level  of
         return  that was the objective when it was formed, will  be
         reduced.
     
bullet   If  the Reinvestment Amendment is approved, cash proceeds
         from  the   sale of a property may be reinvested in  a  new
         property  and,  subject to the same risks  of  real  estate
         investment  that  were assumed when the  Fund  was  formed,
         such  new property could generate continuing cash flow from
         rents and potential gain on sale.
     
bullet   Without the Reinvestment Amendment, an Investor wishing to
         apply  distributed  sales  proceeds  (which  constitute   a
         return  of  a portion of the Investor's original investment
         in  the  Fund) to a similar investment such as an AEI  fund
         would  be  forced  to purchase units in  a  new  fund  with
         distributed  cash. Real estate funds are initially  offered
         subject to sales commissions and organization expense  that
         decrease  the amount invested in properties and, therefore,
         the  asset  base  that  generates income  and  gain  on  an
         investment.                                          
     
bullet   If  the Reinvestment Amendment is approved, no securities
         brokerage commissions or other organizational expense  will
         be  applied to the reinvestment in new properties  of  cash
         from sale of properties.

      The  Fund  incurs  a significant amount of organization  and
syndication  expense at formation.  The General  Partners  believe
that the Fund can generate the most favorable returns to Investors
only  if  the costs of forming the Fund, including commissions  to
sales agents, filing fees and professional costs, can be amortized
against  cash  flow  (primarily  rents)  from  operation  of   all
properties  over  the intended life of the Fund (10  to  12  years
after  purchase of properties).  If a significant portion  of  the
real  property  assets  of the Fund are sold  in  advance  of  the
originally  intended liquidation date of the Fund, the income  and
gain,  if  any,  for the assets remaining may not be  adequate  to
generate the returns that were the original objective of the Fund.

      The General Partners believe, based on recent investments in
and  resales  of properties by other real estate funds  affiliated
with  the  General Partners, that the Fund can generate  favorable
returns   through  the  investment  of  sale  proceeds  in   newly
constructed  replacement properties that  the  Fund  purchases  at
construction  cost and resells within a few years.   When  a  fund
commits to purchase a property upon completion of construction  it
reduces  the  developer's  refinancing risk  and  facilitates  the
construction  of properties for operators, such as franchisees  of
restaurants,  whose  principal goal is  not  real  estate  capital
appreciation.   Because the property is purchased at  construction
cost,  the  risk of development and construction,  for  which  the
developer  is normally compensated, inures to the benefit  of  the
Fund--the market value of properties when purchased will  normally
exceed  the cost of development.  Because no securities  brokerage
commissions  will  be  paid in connection  with  capital  that  is
reinvested,  the  entire  amount of  reinvested  proceeds  can  be
applied  to  the  purchase price and acquisition  expense  and  no
additional  organizational costs that will affect  overall  return
will be incurred.  No assurances can be given, however, that a new
property acquired by the Fund will produce favorable rentals, that
such  rentals  will  not  be interrupted  by  events  outside  the
Managing  General Partner's control, or that the market  value  of
any  properties acquired will exceed their cost immediately  after
acquisition or within the several years the Fund proposes to  hold
the properties.

     The Managing General Partner is currently evaluating a number
of properties for acquisition.  Affiliates of the General Partners
have  managed 13 public and 11 private real estate  funds.   As  a
result  of  their activity in the sale-leaseback marketplace,  the
General Partners have developed relationships with companies that,
either  directly or through their franchisees, have  a  continuing
need  for  commercial real estate.  The Managing  General  Partner
will not be obligated to obtain the consent of Investors as to the
type  of  property  acquired  if  the  Reinvestment  Amendment  is
approved.   Nevertheless, any property acquired will  comply  with
the investment objectives and policies set forth in the Prospectus
pursuant  to which the Units were initially offered.  Any property
acquired  will  be an existing commercial property  that  will  be
acquired  on  a  debt-free basis and will likely be  leased  to  a
single tenant pursuant to a triple net lease.  No property will be
acquired from the General Partners or their affiliates.

                                  -6-

      Sales  of Properties.  The Reinvestment Amendment  is  being
proposed  at  this  time  to facilitate reinvestment  of  the  net
proceeds from possible sales of properties after November 6, 1997.
Although much of the proceeds have been distributed, the Fund  has
retained  some of the proceeds from the eight properties described
below.   The  sales price and certain information about  the  gain
generated by such sales is set forth below:
<TABLE>   
<CAPTION>
                       Applebee's     Applebee's      Jiffy Lube   Jiffy Lube       Sizzler           Super 8   
                    Charleston, SC    Columbia, SC    Dallas, TX   Garland, TX   Cincinnati, OH    Hot Springs, AK
<S>                 <C>               <C>            <C>          <C>           <C>                 <C>    
Purchase date            11/19/87         5/6/88       12/10/87      12/10/87       1/30/90           4/11/88

Percentage of Total(1)       100%         58.12%            25%           50%        30.81%               50%
  Ownership Interest

Sale date                12/15/94        7/28/95       10/25/95     10/25/95        1/23/97           3/29/96

Sales price           $ 1,626,781    $ 1,018,031    $   162,500  $   325,000    $   158,660       $   680,000

Selling expenses           13,494         27,578          1,282        2,558          9,459            16,614

Basis(2)
  Book                    921,762        552,537        125,513      241,943        365,501           448,369
  Tax                     935,628        568,603        128,325      248,096        367,890           464,919

Gain (loss)
  Book                    691,525        437,916         35,705       80,499       (216,300)          215,017
  Tax                     677,659        421,850         32,893       74,346       (218,689)          198,467

Tax gain (loss)
  per unit                     47             29              2            5            (15)               14
</TABLE>
(1) The Fund owns partial interests in title to certain of the
    properties, as indicated.  The remaining interest was  purchased
    by  an  affiliated  real  estate fund  managed  by  the  General
    Partners.

(2) Purchase price less depreciation.
    
      The  Fund  purchased  the Charleston  Applebee's  restaurant
property  in November 1987 and the Columbia property in May  1988.
Both of the Applebee's were newly constructed properties purchased
upon  completion of construction and leased under  20-year  triple
net  leases  to Apple South, Inc. simultaneous with the purchases.
Each  of  the  leases included an option to Apple South,  Inc.  to
purchase the properties commencing in the seventh lease year at  a
price equal to the greater of fair market value or an increase  of
5%  per year over the original purchase price.  Apple South,  Inc.
exercised the option with respect to both properties in 1995.  The
sale  price  listed in the table above represents the  contractual
purchase price based on the 5% escalation.

      The  two  Jiffy  Lube auto care centers  listed  above  were
purchased by the Fund in December 1987 and leased, under a 20 year
triple-net  lease, to Jiffy Lube International of  Maryland,  Inc.
Although  the  lease  did not specifically  provide  a  repurchase
option to the lessee, the Fund negotiated and completed a sale  of
these properties to the lessee in October 1995.

     The Super 8 Motel was purchased by the Fund in April 1988 and
simultaneously  leased  to  Motel  Developers,  Inc.   The   lease
included  an option to purchase the property, which was  exercised
by  the  lessee in July 1995.  Although the sale closed  in  March
1996,  a portion of the gain on sale was recognized in 1995  based
on  receipt  in that year of nonrefundable deposits in  connection
with the sale.
                                  -7-

      The  Sizzler Restaurant was purchased by the Fund in January
1990  and simultaneously leased to Triple S Restaurants, Inc.   In
January 1994, the restaurant was closed and listed for re-lease or
sale.   In  December  1996, the Fund accepted  an  offer  from  an
unaffiliated party to purchase the property at a price  below  the
Fund's basis.  The offer was accepted after a review of the market
conditions   in  the  area  and  the  property  management   costs
associated with continuing to seek a new tenant for the  property,
and the sale was completed in January 1997.

     The Fund has distributed an aggregate of $1,755,800 ($ 122.85
per  Unit)  from  the proceeds of these sales  to  cover  the  tax
liability  of  partners generated by the  gains  on  sale.   These
distributions  of Net Proceeds on Sale, in the aggregate,  reduced
the  Adjusted  Capital Contributions of Investors by  $122.85  per
outstanding Unit.

     In January 1996, the Fund also received $406,892 of insurance
proceeds,  net of demolition and other costs, resulting  from  the
destruction  by  fire  of a restaurant property  in  Indianapolis,
Indiana.  These proceeds resulted in recognition of $88,207 of net
gain  by  the Fund.  The Fund currently does not intend to rebuild
the  property and has listed the land (which has a cost  basis  of
$253,747) for sale.

      Properties  Currently Held by the Fund.  The Fund  currently
holds  interests  in 15 properties (excluding the  land  resulting
from the fire in Indianapolis, Indiana) as summarized below:
   
       Property                       Acquisition Cost   Annual Rental Payments

Creative Years Early Learning Center, 
  Houston,  TX                             $   483,128         $    45,529
Grand Rapids Teachers Credit Union, 
  Wyoming MI                                   626,239              32,370
Arby's Restaurant, Grand Rapids, MI            652,880              24,000
Fuddruckers Restaurant, Omaha, NE            1,151,543             145,081
Children's World Daycare Center, Sterling 
  Heights, MI                                  729,486             105,117
Jiffy Lube Auto Care Center, Dallas, TX        154,891              21,822
JEMCARE (Arkansas Lane), Arlington, TX         450,475              41,796
Zapata's Cantina and Cafe, Waco, TX(3)         674,285              29,752
J.T. McCord's Restaurant, Irving TX          1,147,333                  (1)
J.T. McCord's Restaurant, Mesquite TX(1)       520,109              17,500
JEMCARE (Matlock Avenue), Arlington, TX        603,641              45,907
Cheddar's Restaurant, Indianapolis, IN         253,747                  (2)
Fuddruckers Restaurant, St. Louis, MO          761,053              92,164
Applebee's Restaurant, Slidell, LA             746,465             111,288
Applebee's Restaurant, Victoria, TX          1,335,555             151,110
Caribou Coffee, Atlanta GA                   1,235,000             142,025
                                            -----------         -----------
            Total                          $11,525,830         $ 1,005,461
                                            ===========         ===========

(1) This property is vacant but is subject to a purchase offer
    of  $792,000.   The  purchase offer is  subject  to  the  buyers
    investigation  and  it is not anticipated  that  any  sale  wold
    occur until January 1998.

(2) This property was destroyed by fire and the vacant land is
    listed for sale.

(3) The Lessee of this property has notified the Fund that  it
    intends to vacate the property at expiration of the lease -
    December 31, 1997.

      Effects  of  Amendment.  In the event Investors approve  the
Reinvestment Amendment, a portion of the proceeds from  properties
sold  or  otherwise  disposed of will be  reinvested  rather  than
distributed.   The Fund will not change its investment  objectives
or  policies  and,  accordingly,  new  properties  in  which  such
proceeds  are  invested will consist primarily of  single  tenant,
triple   net   leased   properties  that  are  purchased   without
indebtedness,  many  of  which  are  leased  to  tenants  in   the
restaurant industry.  See "Reinvestment Amendment-General"  above.
If  the proceeds are reinvested, the rental revenues generated  
by the Fund would be increased and distributions from rental revenues
will  be  higher  than they will if proceeds are  not  reinvested.
Distribution  of sales proceeds would be reduced or delayed  until      

                                  -8-

liquidation  of  the  Fund.   Accordingly,  the  General  Partners
believe  approval of the Reinvestment Amendment will result  in  a
more  steady rate of distribution during the life of the Fund with
a large distribution at the end of the life of the Fund.
   
      Interests  of  the  General  Partners  in  the  Reinvestment
Amendment.  In accordance with, and subject to the limitations in,
the  Fund  Agreement, the General Partners will be reimbursed  for
any  costs  (including a proportionate amount of employee  salary,
benefit  and  overhead  expense)  they  incur  in  completing  any
property  acquisition  and in connection with  management  of  the
property.  Generally, costs are allocated to the Fund based on the
daily  time  sheets  of employees.  The Managing  General  Partner
establishes  an  hourly charge for each employee  based  on  their
salaries,  benefit expense and overhead expense  (the  portion  of
rental,  depreciation  and  other  office  charges  necessary   to
maintain  the employee) and the Fund is charged for the amount  of
time  spent by the employee on Fund activities multiplied  by  the
time  charge.  If the Reinvestment Amendment is not approved,  and
the  proceeds from the sale of the properties are not  reinvested,
the  amount  of  capital under management by the General  Partners
through the Fund, and the scope of the Fund's operations, will  be
reduced  and the Managing General Partner will have to deploy  its
employees  in  other activities.  Such reduced operations  can  be
expected  to reduce the amount of reimbursements that the  General
Partners  receive from the Fund.  Reimbursements  to  the  General
Partners   by  the  Fund  for  expenses  incurred  have   averaged
approximately  $213,000 per year during the  past  two  years  and
aggregated  approximately over $665,000  during  the  three  years
ended  December  31, 1996.  Such reimbursements will  decrease  if
cash  is distributed and fewer properties are under management  in
the Fund.

      Further, the General Partners receive more than 1%  of  Fund
cash  flow only to the extent the Fund has generated a 10%  return
to  Investors, and share in sales proceeds only to the extent  the
Fund has paid cumulative distributions to Investors equal to their
Adjusted  Capital Contributions plus a 14% cumulative return.   To
the  extent  that proceeds are reinvested, the properties  perform
well, and these returns can be achieved, the General Partners  may
receive up to 10% of the cash flow remaining after payment of  the
10%  return to Investors and up to 15% of sales proceeds remaining
after payment of the 14% cumulative return to Investors.

Repurchase Amendment

      General.  Over the period of time since the Fund was formed,
a  limited  secondary market has developed for  units  of  limited
partnership interest in real estate limited partnerships like  the
Fund.  Generally, this market is made by individuals and firms who
match  willing sellers with buyers by posting sale proposals  (but
not   prices)  and  by  maintaining  a  list  of  limited  partner
unitholders  who are willing to sell from time to time.   In  most
cases, these transactions are relatively time consuming and do not
represent an active market for such units.  Accordingly, they  may
not  represent actual market value for the Units.  In some  cases,
individuals acquire units of limited partnership interest with the
intent  to  acquire control of partnerships for  invested  amounts
significantly less than the liquidation value of the partnerships'
properties  and to then cause the liquidation of the  partnerships
at a profit to themselves.

      The  development  of  this market has given  Units  held  by
Investors a potential market value that may be different from and,
in   some  instances  greater  than,  the  Unit  values  currently
established  under the terms of the Unit repurchase provisions  of
Section  7.7  of  the Fund Agreement.  It has also  provided  some
liquidity  of  investment for holders of Units,  because  although
purchases  in  the secondary market remain subject to restrictions
under  the terms of the Fund Agreement (e.g., no more than  5%  of
the outstanding Units can change hands in any one year), sales are
not  subject  to the relatively limited annual presentment  period
(between  July 1 and October 1 of each year) provided in the  Fund
Agreement.

      In order to offer Investors the opportunity to present their
Units  to the Fund for repurchase more frequently, and at a  price
that  may  more  closely  reflect  the  prices  available  in  the
secondary  market, the General Partners propose to   amend Section 
7.7  of  the Fund  Agreement to  provide an alternative  valuation 
formula  and  to allow for  quarterly  presentment  of  Units  for 
repurchase, rather  than the  current annual   presentment period. 
The  repurchase formula currently contained in the Fund  Agreement 
bases the repurchase price on  the initial capital contribution of 
an investor less 50% of distributions  to the investor.   The  new
formula  will provide an alternate valuation based on 90%  of  the 
"net  value" of the Fund  (assets less liabilities and intervening 
distributions), after taking into account the market value of units, 
the present value of  future net  cash flow  from the Fund and such  
other factors as the General Partners   may  apply.  The provisions 
of  Section  7.7, as  proposed  to be  amended,  will  provide that 
Investors will be entitled to the price under the  formula yielding 
the highest value.  Because of changes  that must  be  made to  the
Partnership's information  processing  systems  if the Amendment is 
approved,  the Amendment  will be  effective commencing in calendar 
1998 for Units tendered for repurchase  during  that year.    

                                  -9-
   
      Effects of Amendment.  Although the General Partners believe
that  the  new alternative repurchase price formula will generally
yield a higher Unit price than the existing formula, and Investors
will  be entitled to the higher repurchase price determined  under
either  formula, there is no assurance that either  formula  price
will  pay  an  Investor the market value of the Investor's  Units.
Moreover,  the Fund is not required to repurchase in any  calendar
year Units aggregating in excess of 5% of the Units outstanding in
such  year,  and is not required to repurchase Units if  doing  so
would  impair  the  Fund's  ability to continue  operations.   The
Repurchase Amendment will not alter these limitations.  There  may
be  circumstances  under which Fund revenues  and  borrowings  are
insufficient  to fully fund such repurchases.    As  is  currently
the case, if more Units are tendered for purchase than the General
Partners  believe  are  prudent to repurchase  given  the  capital
resources  of  the Fund, tendered Units will be repurchased  on  a
first come, first served basis.

     Repurchases by the Fund, under either the existing or amended
repurchase  provisions,  are  made  out  of  cash  available   for
distribution  and  increase the percentage  interests  in  income,
gain,  deduction  and  distributions  of  the  Fund  of  remaining
Investors, pro rata among such Investors based on their  interests
before  the  repurchases.  Although the Repurchase Amendment  does
not  allow  the  General Partners to establish a repurchase  price
that  is  below the purchase price currently available  under  the
Fund Agreement, it does allow the General Partners to establish  a
repurchase  price  that  is  higher.   To  the  extent  that   the
repurchase  price established by the General Partners exceeds  the
actual economic value (a theoretical value) of the Units that  are
repurchased,  the  overall  economic value  afforded  the  General
Partners and the remaining Investors by their interest in the Fund
will be diminished.  The General Partners believe that the current
formula  establishes a price that is generally  below  the  actual
value  of  the  Units and that the price established  by  matching
services is also below the actual value.  Accordingly, the General
Partners   believe  that  the  Repurchase  Amendment  will   allow
repurchases at a higher price, thereby benefiting both withdrawing
and remaining Investors.                                   
                                  -10-
   
       UNIT OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL HOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT

      The following table sets forth information pertaining to the
ownership  of  the  Units by each person  known  by  the  Fund  to
beneficially  own  5%  or  more of  the  Units,  by  each  General
Partner,  and by each officer or director of the Managing  General
Partners as of December 1, 1997:

Name and Address                                 Number of          Percent
of Beneficial Owner                              Units Held         of Class

AEI Fund Management XVI, Inc.                         10               *
 1300 Minnesota World Trade Center
 30 East 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101

AEI Fund Management, Inc.**                            2               *
 1300 Minnesota World Trade Center
 30 East 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101

Robert P. Johnson                                      6               *
 1300 Minnesota World Trade Center
 30 East 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101

Mark E. Larson                                         0               0
 1300 Minnesota World Trade Center
 30 East 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101

*  Less than 1%
** A  corporation  controlled by Mr. Johnson  and  that  provides
   administrative services to the Fund.

The  persons  set  forth in the preceding table hold  sole  voting
power  and  power of disposition with respect to all of the  Units
set  forth opposite their names.  The General Partners know of  no
holders of more than 5% of the outstanding Units.
                                
             VOTE REQUIRED AND PROCEDURES FOR VOTING

      Voting by Investors with respect to an amendment of the Fund
Agreement  is  based  upon  ownership  of  limited  partner  Units
("Units").   As  of December 1, 1997, there were  13,879.40  Units
outstanding.   Each  Unit is entitled to one vote.   Fractions  of
Units will be included in the total.

      In order for of either the proposed Amendments to be adopted, 
a majority of  the Units must be voted in favor of  the  Amendment.
Because  an  abstention would not be counted  as  a  vote  for  an
amendment,  it  would  have  the  effect  of  a  vote  against  an
amendment.   The  General Partners intend to  vote  all  18  Units
controlled by them in favor of the Amendments.

      Accompanying  this Consent Statement is a Consent  Form  for
each  Investor with respect to his/her unit ownership in the Fund.
By  checking  the  appropriate box,  each  Investor  can  indicate
whether he/she votes FOR or AGAINST or ABSTAINS as to the proposed
Amendments.   IF ANY INVESTOR RETURNS A CONSENT FORM  DULY  SIGNED
WITHOUT CHECKING ANY BOX, HE/SHE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE VOTED  FOR
THE  AMENDMENTS.  An Investor who votes against, or abstains  with
respect  to,  the  Amendments does not have appraisal  or  similar
rights under Minnesota law.

      The Managing General Partner has fixed the close of business
on  December  1, 1997 as the record date for the determination  of
the  Investors  entitled  to vote on the proposed  Amendment,  the
close of business on January 30, 1998 as the date by which Consent
Forms must be received by the Managing General Partner in order to
be counted, and February 2, 1998 as the date on which the consents
are  to be counted.  An Investor may revoke his/her or its consent
at any time prior to January 30, 1998, provided written revocation
is received by the Managing General Partner prior to that date.      
                                  -11-
   
     The cost of solicitation of consents of the Investors will be
borne  by the Fund.  The solicitations will be made by the  mails.
This  Consent Statement is being first mailed to Investors  on  or
about  December  15, 1997.  Staff of the Managing General  Partner
will  be available by telephone to answer any questions concerning
this Consent.
                                
      INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE/FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

      The information included in the Fund's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996 and the FundOs 10-QSBs
for the quarters ended March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997 and September
30,  1997  is  hereby incorporated by reference.  Copies  of  such
Reports  are  being delivered to each Investor with  this  Consent
Statement.

      Such  incorporated  documents, and this  Consent  Statement,
contain   statements   that  are  intended   as   "forward-looking
statements"   within   the  meaning  of  the  Private   Securities
Litigation  Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act").  The words or  phrases
"expects",    "will   continue",   "should",   "is   anticipated",
"believes",  "estimate",  "hopes", or  expressions  of  a  similar
nature  denote  forward looking statements.  Those statements  are
subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to  differ  materially from the results presently  anticipated  or
projected.  The Fund cautions readers not to place undue  reliance
on such forward looking statements and all readers should consider
carefully   risks  that  may  effect  the  attainment   of   those
statements,   including   the   risks   summarized   above   under
"Summary--Risks of the Amendments."

                                 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                 OF  AEI FUND MANAGEMENT XVI, INC.

                                 Robert P. Johnson, President
                                  -12-

                             Exhibit A
   

                      PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF
                LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF
                    AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVI


      Changes  in  the  existing  provisions  of  the  Partnership
Agreement   that  would  be  made  by  the  proposed  Reinvestment
Amendment  and the proposed Repurchase Amendment are shown  below.
Existing  provisions proposed to be omitted are lined through  and
enclosed  in brackets.  New Provisions are printed in  bold  type.
Only  the  portion  of Section 5.4 that will  be  changed  by  the
Reinvestment  Amendment is shown.  If approved,  the  Reinvestment
Amendment  will  be  effective immediately, while  the  Repurchase
Amendment  will be effective for Units tendered in  calendar  1998
and after.

                     REINVESTMENT AMENDMENT
                                
        SECTION 5.4 DISTRIBUTION OF NET PROCEEDS OF SALE

   5.4  Distribution  of  Net  Proceeds  of   Sale.    Upon
        financing, refinancing, sale or other disposition  of  any
        of  the Properties, Net Proceeds of Sale may be reinvested
        in  additional properties until [a date 120  months  after
        the date on which the offer and sale of units pursuant  to
        the   Prospectus  is  terminated,]  THE  GENERAL   PARTNER
        DETERMINES  THAT IT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF  THE  FUND
        TO  BEGIN LIQUIDATION OF THE FUND; provided, however, that
        sufficient cash is distributed to the Limited Partners  to
        pay  state  and  federal  income taxes  (assuming  Limited
        Partners  are taxable at the lesser of (i) a 40%  rate  on
        ordinary  income and a 16% rate on capital gain income  or
        (ii)  the  maximum marginal rates then in effect)  created
        as a result of such transaction.
     
     
                      REPURCHASE AMENDMENT
                                
         SECTION 7.7--RIGHT TO PRESENT UNITS FOR PURCHASE
                                
    7.7 Right  to  Present Units for Purchase.  (a) [Beginning  in
        calendar  year 1988,] Each Limited Partner shall have  the
        right,  subject to the provisions of this Section 7.7,  to
        present  SUCH  PARTNER'S  Units  to  the  Partnership  for
        purchase  by  submitting to the Managing  General  Partner
        [written]  notice  [(postmarked after July  1  but  before
        October  1  of  such  year)] ON A  FORM  SUPPLIED  BY  THE
        PARTNERSHIP (A "REDEMPTION NOTICE") specifying the  number
        of  Units  he  OR  SHE wishes repurchased.   The  MANAGING
        GENERAL  PARTNER  SHALL ESTABLISH ON EACH  OF  JANUARY  1,
        APRIL  1, JULY 1, AND OCTOBER 1 OF EACH YEAR (THE "PRICING
        DATES"),  AND  SHALL  MAKE AVAILABLE TO  LIMITED  PARTNERS
        UPON  REQUEST, A REPURCHASE PRICE (THE "REPURCHASE PRICE")
        FOR  UNITS, DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORMULA  SET
        FORTH  BELOW,  THAT SHALL APPLY TO ALL UNITS TENDERED  FOR
        REPURCHASE  DURING  THE  CALENDAR QUARTER  FOLLOWING  SUCH
        PRICING  DATE.  [On November 1 of each year,]  SUBJECT  TO
        THE  LIMITATIONS  SET  FORTH BELOW, the  Managing  General
        Partner  shall  cause  the  Partnership  to  purchase   on
        JANUARY 1, APRIL 1, JULY 1, AND OCTOBER 1 OF EACH YEAR  (A
        "REPURCHASE  DATE"), AT A REPURCHASE PRICE  EQUAL  TO  THE
        REPURCHASE PRICE ESTABLISHED FOR THE QUARTER IN WHICH  THE
        REDEMPTION  NOTICE  WAS RECEIVED BY THE  PARTNERSHIP,  the
        Units  of Limited Partners [who have tendered their  Units
        to   the  Partnership]  FROM  WHICH  THE  PARTNERSHIP  HAS
        RECEIVED A NOTICE OF REDEMPTION AT LEAST SIXTY DAYS  PRIOR
        TO  SUCH  REPURCHASE  DATE.    The  [purchase]  REPURCHASE
        Price  shall be equal to [the tendering Limited  Partner's
        Adjusted Capital Contribution on October 1 of the year  of
        purchase  multiplied  by seventy-five  percent  (75%)  for
        purchases  in calendar year 1988 and ninety percent  (90%)
        for  purchases  in calendar year 1989.  For  purchases  in
        1990  and  in  each  year thereafter, the  purchase  price
        shall  be  equal  to]  THE GREATER OF (I)  NINETY  PERCENT
        (90%) OF THE NET VALUE OF THE PARTNERSHIP'S ASSETS ON  THE
        PRICING  DATE  DIVIDED BY THE NUMBER OF UNITS  OUTSTANDING
        ON  SUCH PRICING DATE, OR (II) one hundred percent  (100%)
        of   the  tendering  Limited  Partner's  Adjusted  Capital
        Contribution  on  [October 1,]  SUCH PRICING  DATE,   less
        fifty  percent  (50%) of  all  Net  Cash  Flow  previously 
        distributed to such Limited Partner throughout  he term of 
        the Partnership. The Partnership  will not be obligated to 
        purchase in any year more than five  percent  (5%) of  the
        total   number   of  Units  outstanding   on  January 1 of     

                                  -13-

        such  year.  In  the  event requests for purchase of Units
        received  in  any  given  year  exceed  the  five  percent
        (5%)  limitation,  the  Units  to  be  purchased  will  be
        determined  based  on  the postmark date  of  the  written
        notice  of Limited Partners tendering Units.  THE MANAGING
        GENERAL PARTNER MAY SUSPEND REPURCHASES DURING ANY  PERIOD
        AFTER  THE  PARTNERSHIP HAS DISTRIBUTED  NET  PROCEEDS  OF
        SALE   AND  DURING  WHICH  THE  MANAGING  GENERAL  PARTNER
        REASONABLY  BELIEVES THAT THE REPURCHASE  PRICE  DOES  NOT
        APPROPRIATELY  REFLECT THE NET VALUE OF THE  PARTNERSHIP'S
        REMAINING  ASSETS  LESS LIABILITIES.  Any  Units  tendered
        but  not  selected for purchase in any given year will  be
        considered  for purchase in subsequent years only  if  the
        Limited Partner retenders his OR HER  Units.  In no  event
        shall  the Partnership be obligated to purchase Units  if,
        in  the  sole discretion of the Managing General  Partner,
        such  purchase  would impair the capital or  operation  of
        the Partnership.
     
          (b)   For  purposes  of  all  calculations  pursuant  to
          Article  V of this agreement, any Net Cash Flow  or  Net
          Proceeds  of Sale used to repurchase Units or  to  repay
          borrowings that were used to repurchase Units  shall  be
          deemed  distributed  to the remaining  Limited  Partners
          pro  rata  based  on the ratio of the  number  of  Units
          owned  to  all Units outstanding after such  repurchase.
          FOR  PURPOSES  OF  THE  FORMULA  IN  SUBSECTION  (A)(II)
          ABOVE,  "NET  VALUE" MEANS THE AGGREGATE  VALUE  OF  THE
          PARTNERSHIP'S ASSETS LESS THE PARTNERSHIP'S  LIABILITIES
          AND  LESS  THE  MANAGING  GENERAL  PARTNER'S  REASONABLE
          ESTIMATE  OF DISTRIBUTIONS OF NET PROCEEDS OF  SALE  FOR
          THE  PERIOD  AFTER  THE  PRICING  DATE  BUT  BEFORE  THE
          REPURCHASE  DATE, AS DETERMINED BY THE MANAGING  GENERAL
          PARTNER.    IN   DETERMINING  NET  VALUE,  THE   GENERAL
          PARTNERS  MAY  ALSO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT  (I)  THE  PRESENT
          VALUE OF FUTURE NET CASH FLOW FROM RENTAL INCOME ON  THE
          FUND'S PROPERTIES, (II) THE PRICE AT WHICH UNITS OF  THE
          PARTNERSHIP  HAVE BEEN PURCHASED, AND (III)  SUCH  OTHER
          FACTORS AS THE GENERAL PARTNERS DEEM RELEVANT.

                                  -14-     
     
IMPORTANT                                              IMPORTANT
          AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                   CONSENT OF LIMITED PARTNERS
             This consent is solicited by the Board
         of Directors of AEI Fund Management XVI, Inc.,
                  The Managing General Partner

      The  undersigned, a Limited Partner of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVI  Limited  Partnership  (the "Fund"), hereby  consents  (unless
otherwise  directed  below) to the proposals identified  below  to
adopt  (i)  an Amendment to Section 5.4 of the Limited Partnership
Agreement   (the  "Partnership  Agreement")  of  the   Fund   (the
"Reinvestment Amendment"), and (ii) an Amendment to Section 7.7 of
the  Partnership Agreement (the "Repurchase Amendment"),  as  more
fully  described in the accompanying Consent Statement  (together,
the  "Amendments").  By voting for the Amendments,  or  either  of
them,  the  undersigned hereby appoints AEI Fund  Management  XVI,
Inc. as its attorney-in-fact with power to sign and acknowledge on
its behalf any instrument that may be necessary to evidence either
Amendment  to  the  Partnership Agreement  and  any  corresponding
Amendment to the Fund's Certificate of Limited Partnership.

      Please date and sign this Consent below and return it in the
enclosed, postage paid envelope.  To be counted, this Consent must
be  received  not later than the close of business on January  30,
1998.

      1.  Adoption of the Reinvestment Amendment to Section 5.4 of
the Partnership Agreement
      FOR    [ ]          AGAINST    [ ]          ABSTAIN     [ ]

      2.   Adoption of the Repurchase Amendment to Section 7.7  of
the Partnership Agreement
      FOR    [ ]          AGAINST    [ ]          ABSTAIN     [ ]

      The  Fund Units held by the signing Limited Partner will  be
voted as directed.  They will be voted "FOR" the Amendments if  no
box is checked.

      Please  sign exactly as your name appears below.  When  Fund
Units  are  held by joint tenants, both owners should sign.   When
signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian,
please give full title as such.  If a corporation, please sign  in
full corporate name by president or other authorized officer.   If
a  partnership,  please  sign in partnership  name  by  authorized
person.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THIS CONSENT.

Dated:          , 199_


Signature                                (if held jointly)

                                   -15-


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission