UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ................ TO ...............
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-9311
PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 22-2754689
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
c/o PRIME-AMERICAN REALTY CORP.
P.O. BOX 230
HAWTHORNE, NJ 07507
(Registrant's Mailing Address)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (201) 791-6166
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Exchange On Which Registered
UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST OVER THE COUNTER BULLETIN BOARD
EVIDENCED BY DEPOSITORY RECEIPTS
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes _ No X .
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant
to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (X)
On November 16, 1999 there were 4,000,000 of registrant's units of
limited partnership interest outstanding, 2,450,819 of which are held by an
affiliate and 1,549,181 of which are held by non-affiliates. The aggregate
market value of such units held by non-affiliates on that date based on the
reported closing price on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board on that date,
was approximately $72,618. The Exhibit Index is located on pages 48 through
50.
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Prime Motor Inns Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") was formed
in October 1986 under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act
(the "Delaware Act"). AMI Operating Partners, L.P. ("Operating Partners"),
which until May 28, 1998 was a 99% owned subsidiary of the Partnership, was
also formed in October, 1986 under the Delaware Act. The Partnership and
Operating Partners are referred to collectively as the "Partnerships."
Prime-American Realty Corp. (the "General Partner"), a subsidiary of Prime
Hospitality Corporation ("Prime"), formerly Prime Motor Inns, Inc., is the
general partner of and holds a 1% partnership interest in the Partnership and,
until May 28, 1998, was the general partner of and held a 1% partnership
interest in Operating Partners. Until May 28, 1998, the business of the
Partnerships was to operate and maintain full-service hotels (the "Inns"),
which were franchised as part of the "Holiday Inn" system. On May 28, 1998,
Servico Acquisition Corp. ("SAC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Servico, Inc.
("Servico"), acquired the Partnership's 99% limited partnership interest in
Operating Partners (the "Interest"), subject to the outstanding indebtedness
and other obligations of Operating Partners, for $12,000,000 in cash. At the
same time, Servico acquired the General Partner's 1% general partnership
interest in Operating Partners. On May 28, 1998, the Partnership adopted a
Plan of Dissolution and Liquidation (the "Plan of Liquidation") and began to
wind up its affairs.
The Inns were purchased from subsidiaries of Prime in December, 1986,
with the proceeds of the public offering of 4,000,000 units of limited
partnership interest (the "Units") in the Partnership and of the issuance and
sale of $61,470,000 of mortgage notes (the "Mortgage Notes") of Operating
Partners. Until November 30, 1990, the Inns were leased to AMI Management
Corp. ("AMI Management"), a subsidiary of Prime, pursuant to a net lease
between AMI Management and Operating Partners (the "Lease"). On September 18,
1990, Prime and certain of its subsidiaries, including AMI Management, filed
for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the "Prime
Bankruptcy") and, effective November 30, 1990, AMI Management rejected the
Lease. At that time, Operating Partners, through Winegardner & Hammons, Inc.
("W&H"), a prominent hotel management company with operational experience with
"Holiday Inn" franchises, took control of the Inns and commenced operation of
the Inns for the account of the Partnerships.
In 1990, when Operating Partners and W&H took control of the Inns,
they found that the physical condition of the Inns, and customer satisfaction,
had deteriorated seriously. As a result of the physical condition of the Inns
and the level of operations at the Inns, the depressed economy in the
Northeast, the depressed state of the travel and hospitality industries, and
the depressed state of the real estate market, in 1991 Operating Partners was
required to write down the value of the Inns from more than $101 million to
approximately $55 million. The carrying value of the Inns after that
write-down was approximately $9 million less than the approximately $64
million outstanding balance of and accrued interest on the Mortgage Notes at
December 31, 1991.
The Board of the General Partner was of the opinion that occupancies
and cash flows at the Inns during 1991 and 1990 were adversely affected by,
among other things, international tensions in the Middle East and the economic
recession that began in 1990, and the resulting slowdown in travel, and AMI
Management's operation of the Inns, primarily in the period immediately prior
to and during its bankruptcy.
In 1991 the Partnership and Operating Partners asserted claims
against Prime and AMI Management in the Prime Bankruptcy with respect to
defaults under the Lease and Prime's guaranty of certain obligations under the
Lease (the "Guaranty"), the operation and maintenance of the Inns prior to and
following the commencement of the Prime Bankruptcy, and the rejection of the
Lease and the Guaranty. Operating Partners entered into an agreement under
which, among other things, Operating Partners assigned to the holders of the
Mortgage Notes (the "Mortgage Lenders") its claims (including claims in
connection with such disputes) against Prime and AMI Management and agreed
that amounts recovered on such claims would be allocated among financial
claims (the proceeds of which would be applied to the repayment of the
Mortgage Notes) and operating claims (the proceeds of which would be available
to finance capital improvements to the Inns). In July, 1992 the Florida
Bankruptcy Court approved a settlement (the "Prime Settlement"), under which
various claims of the holders of the Mortgage Notes against Prime and AMI
Management were allowed; Operating Partners did not make any payments to or
for the benefit of any other party; and Prime, AMI Management and Operating
Partners exchanged mutual releases.
Subsequent to the approval of the Prime Settlement, Operating
Partners and the Mortgage Lenders received a total of approximately $8,874,000
under the Prime Settlement. Of such proceeds, $8,827,000 was utilized to
reduce the principal amount of the Mortgage Notes and $47,000 was used to fund
capital improvements.
To conserve cash in order to provide funds to maintain and improve
the Inns and pay suppliers, Operating Partners suspended the monthly payments
of the principal and interest on the Mortgage Notes beginning with the
payments due on February 28, 1991, which constituted an event of default
under, and resulted in acceleration and demand for payment of the entire
outstanding balance of, the Mortgage Notes. After detailed and extended
negotiations among Operating Partners and its advisors and representatives of
the Mortgage Lenders and their advisors, the Mortgage Lenders agreed to
restructure the Mortgage Notes as part of a "prepackaged" reorganization of
Operating Partners and three of the Mortgage Lenders (the "Priming Lenders")
agreed to provide post-petition financing (the "Priming Loan") of up to an
aggregate of $14 million to finance the refurbishment and upgrading of the
Inns and to fund operating deficiencies.
On February 28, 1992, Operating Partners filed for reorganization
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and sought confirmation of the
prepackaged plan of reorganization consented to by the Mortgage Lenders (the
"Plan of Reorganization"). On May 28, 1992 the Plan of Reorganization was
confirmed.
To continue to operate the Inns as part of the "Holiday Inn" system,
beginning in July, 1991, Operating Partners paid fees to acquire franchise
agreements to replace those that had been held by AMI Management. Holiday
Hospitality Corporation, formerly Holiday Inns, Inc. and its affiliates
engaged in administering the "Holiday Inn" system (collectively, "HHC") issued
a new ten-year franchise agreement for the Baltimore Inner Harbor Inn to
December 2005, and extended to June 30, 1997 the term of the franchise
agreements that previously expired prior to June 30, 1997.
Operating Partners and W&H entered into a management agreement (the
"W&H Management Agreement") pursuant to which W&H managed the Inns through
1996, renewable for two two-year renewal terms. Under the W&H Management
Agreement, W&H was paid an annual base management fee of 2.25% of the gross
revenues of the Inns, an incentive management fee based on defined income in
excess of defined amounts, and was reimbursed for miscellaneous out-of-pocket
expenses allocated to the Inns, including salaries, accounting, legal,
computer services, royalties, marketing, advertising, public relations and
reservation services, subject to certain limitations.
The Plan of Reorganization provided for the Priming Loan to Operating
Partners, which was to be in the principal amount of up to $14,000,000, due
December 31, 1999, to bear interest at the rate of 11% per annum, and to be
secured by a security interest, lien and mortgage senior to all other liens on
the property of Operating Partners. Of the Priming Loan, $11,500,000 (the
"Tranche A Loan") was to be used to fund a capital improvement program, and to
be subject to a prepayment penalty of 2%, and the $2,500,000 balance of the
Priming Loan (the "Tranche B Loan") was a revolving credit facility to be used
to fund operating cash requirements.
All revenues in excess of budgeted or otherwise approved operating
and administrative expenses, debt service, a reserve for capital replacements
(the "FF&E Reserve," which amounted to 1 1/2% of gross revenues in 1993, 4% of
gross revenues in 1994 and 5% of gross revenues in 1995 and thereafter),
income taxes (if the Partnerships were taxable as corporations) and amounts
necessary to enable Operating Partners to maintain a working capital reserve
of $2 million, were required to be applied by Operating Partners to the
repayment of the Tranche B Loan, then to be deposited into an escrow account
held on behalf of the Lenders for payment of taxes and insurance, and then to
be applied to pay the Tranche A Loan. In the event of a default under the
Priming Loan, the agent for the Priming Lenders could, in addition to any
other remedies, cure any defaults of Operating Partners and/or declare the
entire outstanding balance of the Priming Loan to be due and payable. Default
provisions under the Priming Loan included, among others, (a) default for five
days in the payment of interest, (b) default for five days after notice in the
payment of any other amounts due under the Priming Loan documents, and (c)
acquisition by any person, without the consent of 75% in interest of the
Priming Lenders, of 50% or more of the Units, or the sale, without the consent
of 75% in interest of the Priming Lenders, of the Partnership's interest in
Operating Partners or of 50% or more of the stock of the General Partner.
The Plan of Reorganization also provided for the restatement of the
loan agreement for the Mortgage Notes (as restated, the "Mortgage Loan"),
under which $3,467,000 of accrued and unpaid interest at December 31, 1991
(the "Deferred Amount") was added to the principal amount of the Mortgage
Notes, but bore interest only from and after January 1, 1995; the Mortgage
Notes (not including the Deferred Amount) bore interest at the rate of 7% per
annum in 1992 and 1993 and 8% in 1994; the principal amount of the Mortgage
Notes (including the Deferred Amount) bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum
after 1994; and the maturity of the Mortgage Notes (including the Deferred
Amount) was extended to December 31, 1999. In addition, the Mortgage Loan
included a shared appreciation feature, pursuant to which, upon the sale of
any Inn and/or upon the maturity (by acceleration, at the stated maturity
date, or otherwise) of the Mortgage Loan, a portion of the appreciation, if
any, in the value of such Inn (in the case of sale of an Inn) or all of the
Inns (in the case of maturity of the Mortgage Loan) over the amount of the
Mortgage Loan allocated thereto would be payable as additional interest on the
Mortgage Loan. However, no amount was payable as shared appreciation until all
obligations under the Priming Loan had been met. During the term of the
Mortgage Loan, Operating Partners was permitted to retain $2 million of
working capital. All operating revenues in excess of the amount necessary to
maintain that working capital and to make the required payments described
above was required to be applied to repayment of the Mortgage Notes after the
Priming Loan had been paid. The Mortgage Notes could be repaid at any time
without penalty.
In addition, in consideration of the agreement of the Mortgage
Lenders to the restructuring of the Mortgage Notes, Operating Partners and the
Partnership deposited the deeds to the Inns and assignments of other assets of
Operating Partners in escrow. Under the terms of the escrow agreement, those
deeds and assignments were to be released from escrow to a designee of the
Mortgage Lenders if certain defaults occurred and continued uncured for 90
days. Such defaults included, among others, (a) non-payment when due, of any
principal, interest or other charges under the Priming or Mortgage Loans, (b)
failure to pay rent on any ground leases, (c) failure to pay real and personal
property taxes on the Inns, (d) failure to pay or provide for premiums for
insurance required under the Priming or Mortgage Loans, or the mortgages
securing them, and (e) failure to pay operating expenses for the Inns (subject
to certain rights to contest amounts claimed to be due). In the escrow
agreement, Operating Partners agreed not to interpose any defense or objection
to, or bring any lawsuit opposing, the Mortgage Lenders' exercise of their
rights under the escrow agreement, or, if Operating Partners filed another
bankruptcy case, contesting the lifting of any stay to permit the Mortgage
Lenders to exercise such rights.
Following its reorganization, Operating Partners made the capital
improvements, refurbishments and repairs necessary to render the condition of
the Inns suitable and adequate for Operating Partners' business, to satisfy
HHC quality standards, to correct deficiencies at the Inns, and to restore the
competitive position of the Inns. Operating Partners also substantially
upgraded the Baltimore Inner Harbor Inn. Improvements and refurbishments
totaling $13,000,872 were completed in 1994, $11,500,000 of which was funded
from the proceeds of the Tranche A Loan and $1,500,872 of which was funded
from the FF&E Reserve. Subsequent to the completion of that capital
improvement program, Operating Partners made additional improvements and
refurbishments totaling in excess of $7,500,000, funded from the FF&E Reserve,
in additional to ongoing maintenance and repairs.
Historically, the Inns experienced cash flow deficiencies in the
first quarter of each year, re-flecting reduced travel and high operating
costs in the winter months. Operating Partners made borrowings under the
Tranche B Loan during the first quarter of each of 1996, 1997 and 1998, and
repaid such borrowings in the second and third quarters of the year. There
were not been any unpaid balances under the Tranche B Loan at December 31,
1996, 1997 or 1998.
The "Holiday Inn" franchises of ten Inns (one of which was sold in
July, 1997) were to expire on June 30, 1997 and the "Holiday Inn" franchises
of an additional two Inns were to expire on December 31, 1997. Before the
renewal of an expiring franchise for any "Holiday Inn" property, the property
is inspected by HHC and that inspection forms the basis for a Property
Improvement Plan (a "PIP"), the completion of which is a condition to the
renewal of the franchise for the property. Prior to December 31, 1995, HHC had
inspected and prepared PIPs for ten of the Inns whose franchises were to
expire in 1997. Although HHC had previously indicated that it might not renew
the franchises for the remaining two Inns whose franchises were to expire in
1997 and, accordingly, had not prepared PIPs for those Inns, during the second
quarter of 1996, HHC inspected and prepared PIPs for those Inns. Based on the
PIPs, for the 12 Inns and on analyses of W&H, Operating Partners estimated the
cost of the capital expenditures required by those PIPs to be approximately
$13,000,000, although Operating Partners believed that the scope of work and
related costs would be subject to negotiation. In addition, the franchise
renewal fees for those Inns would have been approximately $884,000 ($500 per
room). Operating Partners engaged W&H to evaluate, for each Inn, the relative
benefits and costs of renewing the "Holiday Inn" franchise for the Inn,
operating the Inn under other franchises that may be available, and operating
the Inn without a franchise affiliation. Based on W&H's evaluation, Operating
Partners, determined that the Inns should remain franchised as "Holiday Inns".
On that basis, Operating Partners reached an agreement with HHC as to the
terms and conditions of the franchise renewals. At the same time, the General
Partner and Operating Partners continued to evaluate the improvements and
expenditures included in each of the PIPs, in order to identify those items
that Operating Partners believed would enhance the Inn's ability to continue
to compete in its market and would add value to the Inn, and those
improvements or expenditures that Operating Partners believed to be less
necessary or which would add little value. The General Partner also continued
negotiations with HHC as to the scope of work included in each PIP and the
length of time within which such improvements would be completed. Generally,
in connection with the renewal of the franchise for an Inn, Operating Partners
would have one year, which the General Partner thought might be negotiable,
from the expiration date of the old franchise to complete the capital
improvements included in the PIP.
Beginning in August, 1995, the General Partner began efforts to
arrange financing for the costs of renewal of those "Holiday Inn" franchises,
including seeking the consent of the holders of the Priming and Mortgage Loans
to utilize FF&E Reserves to fund the PIPs and seeking to refinance the Priming
and Mortgage Loans on terms that would provide (or enable Operating Partners
to generate internally) additional financing for franchise renewals. During
1996 the General Partner continued its efforts to arrange financing for the
franchise renewals and/or refinancing of the Priming and Mortgage Loans. At
the same time, the General Partner continued its negotiations with HHC as to
the scope and timing of work required for the PIPs, and entered into
negotiations with contractors to minimize the costs of capital improvements.
Effective January 4, 1997, the initial term of the W&H Management
Agreement was extended for four years, through 2000. However, in order to
facilitate financing of the PIPs, a provision was added to the W&H Management
Agreement which grants to either the Partnership or W&H the right to terminate
the agreement, without penalty, at any time without cause, upon at least 90
days prior written notification to the other party. However, under the Priming
and Mortgage Loans, approval by the Mortgage Lenders and Priming Lenders
(collectively the "Lenders") was required for the Partnership to elect to
terminate the W&H Management Agreement.
In 1996, the General Partner determined to sell the Glen Burnie South
and Baltimore Moravia Road Inns and in early 1997 entered into a contract for
sale of the Glen Burnie South Inn (which sale was completed on July 29, 1997).
In early 1997, the General Partner determined also to sell the Baltimore
Pikesville, Baltimore Belmont, Frederick MD, Lancaster Rt. 501, York Market
Street and Hazleton Inns, and subsequently entered into a contract for sale of
the Baltimore Pikesville Inn (which sale was completed on May 1, 1998). Those
Inns were either operating at a loss or would not produce a return to the
Partnership sufficient to justify the costs of renewal fees and PIPs. However,
the net proceeds from the sale of the Glen Burnie South and Baltimore
Pikesville Inns were, and the proceeds from the sale of the other Inns were
required to be, applied to pay the 2% prepayment penalty on, and to reduce the
outstanding principal balance of, the Priming Loan and, after repayment of the
Priming Loan, to reduce the outstanding principal balance of, and to pay the
shared appreciation, if any, under the Mortgage Notes. None of such proceeds
were available to finance the PIPs or franchise renewal fees (and the holders
of the Priming Loan and Mortgage Notes declined to permit the use of such
proceeds for such purpose or for the acquisition of other properties).
Beginning in December, 1996, and continuing through the early Spring
of 1997, the General Partner received correspondence from Dilworth, Paxson,
Kalish & Kaufman LLP (now Dilworth Paxson LLP) ("DP"), a law firm purporting
to represent five Unitholders. In that correspondence, DP broadly charged the
General Partner with breaches of fiduciary duty and gross negligence by reason
of the alleged failure of the General Partner to oversee W&H, as manager of
the Inns, and to make adequate provision for the PIPs. DP also requested that
the management agreement with W&H be terminated or renewed only on a short
term basis. The letters threatened filing of a derivative action on behalf of
the Partnership in the event these matters were not resolved to the
satisfaction of the five Unitholders and also requested a meeting with the
General Partner to discuss these and other matters relating to the
Partnership.
In subsequent correspondence, DP stated that its clients were
considering making a tender offer for the Units and requested that additional
information be provided to such clients. The General Partner declined to
provide any non-public information in the context of a tender offer, but did
offer to meet with the clients to discuss the operations and condition of the
Partnerships. In May, 1997, the General Partner met with Jerome Sanzo and
members of DP. Mr. Sanzo stated that he did not have any interest in suing the
General Partner and was not then considering a tender offer, but did want the
General Partner to support a transaction in which one or more persons
(including persons who were not then Unitholders) would contribute capital
and/or properties to the Partnership in exchange for an equity interest in the
Partnerships. Mr. Sanzo expressed the view that, with the additional resources
and some restructuring of its operations, the Partnership could become a
growing active real estate business. The General Partner stated that, while it
could not commit to support any proposed transaction without knowing the terms
of the transaction (particularly since the transaction summarized by Mr. Sanzo
appeared to involve dilution of the interest of the non-contributing
Unitholders), it would not impede presentation to the Unitholders of any
proposal that Mr. Sanzo and his associates chose to make.
In June, 1997, the General Partner requested that HHC extend the
franchise agreements expiring on June 30, 1997, to enable the General Partner
and Operating Partners to continue to seek financing for the PIPs and the
franchise renewal fees. In consideration of a $125,000 payment by Operating
Partners of franchise renewal fees, HHC agreed to extend the franchise
agreements for the ten Inns to July 31, 1997 (which was extended from time to
time thereafter). In June and July, 1997, HHC prepared revised PIPs for the
Inns based on HHC's current standards.
The renewal of the "Holiday Inn" franchises (or any change in the
franchise affiliation of the Inns), capital expenditures for improvements
required by the PIPs, and any financing for PIPs and franchise renewal fees
required the consent of the Lenders. Operating Partners submitted the
franchise renewal agreements to the Lenders for their review, but the Lenders
were unwilling to take action in the absence of firm indications of the source
and availability of financing. The Lenders did consent, however, to Operating
Partners making a $125,000 prepayment to HHC of franchise renewal fees in
consideration of HHC's extension of ten expiring franchises to enable the
General Partner and Operating Partners to continue to seek financing for the
PIPs and franchise renewal fees.
Through June, 1997, the General Partner had not received any
acceptable financing proposals. The holders of the Priming and Mortgage Loans
had indicated that they were not interested in providing any of the required
financing (and subsequently indicated that they would not permit the FF&E
Reserves to be utilized to finance the PIPs), and were not agreeable to the
refinancing proposals by the General Partner that called for a discount on the
Priming and Mortgage Loans. The General Partner approached a number of
investment banks and financial institutions recognized for arranging or
providing real estate financing (including through securitization of loan
portfolios). A number of those institutions were not interested in considering
a financing transaction. While some of those institutions were willing to
propose financing transactions, in each case the amount of financing that the
institution was prepared to consider arranging or providing was significantly
below the outstanding balance of the Priming and Mortgage Loans and did not
provide any financing for the PIPs. In addition, most of the proposals
received were contingent upon the Priming and Mortgage Loans being purchased
or refinanced at a discount and required that the new lenders receive a
substantial equity interest in the Partnership or Operating Partners. The
General Partner believed that such proposals were disadvantageous to the
Unitholders. The General Partner also received a number of proposals to assist
or advise the Partnership in proposals for the sale of interests in, or assets
or operations of, Operating Partners and/or to restructure Operating Partners
and the Partnership. However, none of those proposals provided any evidence of
the terms or sources of any financing or any indication of interest by any
party in proceeding with (much less a commitment of any party to complete) a
transaction.
On June 20, 1997, the General Partner received a communication from
DP stating it had been authorized by Unitholders holding 25% of the Units to
request a Special Meeting to remove Prime-American Realty Corp ("PARC") as
General Partner and to elect a new General Partner. The General Partner and DP
first planned to hold the Special Meeting on August 19, 1997 and then
rescheduled the Meeting for November 5, 1997. The Notice of Meeting for the
November 5 Special Meeting, mailed in September, 1997, called for the removal
of PARC, as General Partner and the election of Davenport Management Corp.
("DMC"), a corporation owned and controlled by Jerome Sanzo, as the substitute
General Partner. On October 29, 1997, at the request of DMC, the November 5,
Special Meeting was postponed to a date to be determined in the future.
In August, 1997, HHC advised the General Partner that it did not
desire to renew the franchises, that were to expire in 1997, for five Inns
(all of which were Inns that the General Partner had theretofore determined to
sell). HHC also indicated its unwillingness to extend the expiration of the
franchises if the General Partner and Operating Partners could not provide
realistic plans for financing the PIPs and the franchise renewal fees. HHC
extended the time within which the General Partner and Operating Partners were
required to present such plans, first to September 19, then to September 30,
October 15, and November 14, 1997. Operating Partners submitted a plan for the
completion of the PIPs (including the improvements to be made and the schedule
therefor) for five Inns whose franchises were to expire in 1997 and the sale
of seven of Inns (including six whose Holiday Inn franchises were to expire in
1997 and one whose franchise was to expire on December 31, 2001). The cost of
the PIPs for the five Inns that were to be retained whose franchises were to
expire in 1997 was estimated to be approximately $7,500,000 and the fees for
the renewal of the "Holiday Inn" franchises for those Inns would have been
approximately $438,500 ($500 per room).
In response to HHC's reluctance to provide further extensions of
expiring "Holiday Inns" franchises without a firm financing plan, commencing
in August, 1997 the General Partner accelerated its efforts to arrange
financing for the PIPs and the franchise renewal fees or to enter into another
transaction (including the sale of Inns) to preserve and protect the interests
of the Unitholders. Among other things, the General Partner solicited
proposals from each party that had approached the General Partner with
proposals to provide financing to, or acquire interests in, the Partnership,
or to acquire assets or operations of AMI. On September 26, 1997 Servico made,
and on September 29, 1997 publicly announced, an offer to acquire the
Interest. No other complete offers or proposals were submitted (nor was there
any proposal that contemplated a price, or return to the Unitholders, as high
as that provided by the Servico offer).
The General Partner believed that the physical condition and
attractiveness of the Inns had been enhanced by the capital improvement
program and the continuing capital improvements and refurbishments and that
the increased attractiveness of the Inns and increased marketing and sales
promotions had improved the market position and competitiveness of the Inns.
However, approximately one third of the Inns were "highway oriented"
properties (which, in general, had lagged behind in demand, compared to
midscale and urban, suburban and airport location properties). Highway
oriented properties, because they have exterior corridors and are older
properties, have a dated appearance. As a result, the General Partner
determined that it was unlikely that financing would be available on
acceptable terms to take the actions necessary to preserve the Unitholders'
interest in the Inns. After extensive analysis of the alternatives and of the
Servico offer, the General Partner began negotiations with Servico.
The General Partner and counsel to the Partnership engaged in
extensive and detailed negotiations with Servico and its counsel with respect
to the terms and conditions of the transaction and the acquisition agreement
embodying that transaction. Following the conclusion of such negotiations, the
General Partner approved the terms and conditions of, and executed and
delivered, an acquisition agreement dated as of November 7, 1997 (the
"Original Acquisition Agreement") pursuant to which SAC would purchase the
Interest, subject to Operating Partners' outstanding obligations, for $8
million in cash (the "Purchase Price") and Servico would make certain
undertakings and indemnifications. Thereafter, at the request of Servico and
the General Partner, HHC extended the franchises that were expiring in 1997 to
December 26, 1997 (which was extended from time to time, ultimately to June
10, 1998) in order to allow time for the Unitholders to consider the sale of
the Interest to SAC.
The General Partner retained Furman Selz ("Furman Selz") to render an
opinion (the "Fairness Opinion") to the Board of Directors as to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, of the Purchase Price to the Unitholders.
Furman Selz delivered its written opinion to the Board of Directors of the
General Partner to the effect that, as of November 7, 1997, the date of the
execution and delivery of the Original Acquisition Agreement, the Purchase
Price and the terms and conditions of the Original Acquisition Agreement were
fair, from a financial point of view, to the Unitholders.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Furman Selz among other
things: (i) reviewed the Original Acquisition Agreement; (ii) reviewed the
Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1996, and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q setting forth its financial
results for the periods ended March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997, and September 30,
1997; (iii) reviewed certain operating and financial information, including
projections, provided to Furman Selz by the General Partner relating to the
Partnership's business and prospects; (iv) reviewed the financial terms of the
Priming and Mortgage Loans; (v) met with certain members of the General
Partner's senior management to discuss the operations, historical financial
statements and future prospects of Operating Partners and the Inns; (vi) spoke
with certain employees of W&H familiar with the operations and prospects of
the Inns; (vii) reviewed the historical prices and trading volumes of the
Units; (viii) reviewed publicly available financial data and stock market
valuations of companies that it deemed generally comparable to the
Partnership; (ix) reviewed the terms of recent acquisitions of companies that
it deemed generally comparable to the Partnership; and (x) conducted other
such studies, analyses, inquiries, and investigations as it deemed
appropriate.
In November, 1997 DMC requested that the theretofore-postponed
Special Meeting be called, and DMC and the General Partner agreed on January
29, 1998 as the meeting date. In late December, 1997, DMC distributed a proxy
statement in which it solicited proxies for, among other things, the removal
of PARC as General Partner and the election of DMC as the replacement General
Partner. DMC's proxy statement also proposed a "Plan of Action," including,
(i) the renegotiation or refinancing of the Priming and Mortgage Loans, (ii)
the renegotiation of the "Holiday Inn" franchises and (iii) the sale of
underperforming Inns and the acquisition of additional properties. The General
Partner believed that some elements of the DMC "Plan of Action" were already
in place and other elements were neither practicable nor realistic. DMC's
proxy statement disclosed that Martin W. Field ("Field") supported and
provided financing for, and was a participant in, the DMC proxy solicitation.
Shortly before the January 29, 1998 Meeting, the principal lender
under the Priming and Mortgage Loans advised the General Partner that removal
and replacement of the general partner of the Partnership or Operating
Partners without the consent of the lenders under the Priming and Mortgage
Loans would constitute an event of default and that "while [the principal
lender has] not made a final determination, based upon the information
regarding the identity and background of the proposed substitute general
partner received to date, we would not at this time grant such consent." By
letter dated January 28, 1998, counsel to the Partnership advised DP that it
believed that the Special Meeting should not be held until DMC's proxy
statement had been supplemented to disclose the position of such lender or
otherwise to remove the threat to the Unitholders. DP advised counsel to the
Partnership that, the Meeting having been called and the Meeting being
imminent, there was no way to advise Unitholders of a change of schedule prior
to the meeting time and no mechanism for rescheduling the Meeting except by
convening the Meeting and adjourning the Meeting to a later date. DP proposed
that the Meeting be convened, that Jerome Sanzo, the President of DMC, make a
brief statement, and that the Meeting then be adjourned.
At the meeting on January 29, it was reported that the holders of
approximately 71% of the Units had submitted proxies to DMC to remove PARC as
General Partner and that the holders of approximately 63% of the Units had
submitted proxies to admit DMC as the replacement General Partner. Since
removal of PARC as General Partner required the consent of the holders of more
than 80% of the Units and the election of DMC as the replacement General
Partner was conditioned on, among other things, the removal of PARC, the DMC
proposals would not have been adopted at that time. Following a statement on
behalf of the Partnership, a statement by Mr. Sanzo and discussion by those
Unitholders present, the Meeting was adjourned without action to February 24,
1998. Following the adjournment of the Meeting, DMC supplemented its proxy
statement and continued its solicitation of proxies. At the February 24
Meeting, the vote was substantially unchanged and the meeting was again
adjourned to a date to be determined.
On February 12, 1998 HHC advised the General Partner that, as a
result of Operating Partners' failure timely to accept the license agreements
offered by HHC in July 1997 to renew Operating Partners' "Holiday Inn"
franchises that were to expire in 1997, HHC had withdrawn the offer. On
February 23, 1998, HHC advised the General Partner that it would not extend
such franchises when they expired on March 2, 1998. HHC subsequently advised
the Partnership that it would extend the "Holiday Inn" franchises for such
Inns for 60 days if an application by a "viable" applicant for franchises for
the six Inns that HHC was willing to keep in the "Holiday Inn" system were
submitted, and application fees in the amount of $517,000 were paid, by March
10, 1998. Because of Operating Partners' inability to arrange financing, HHC
did not consider Operating Partners a "viable" applicant. Servico filed an
application, and AMI paid the application fees (with the right to have the fee
transferred to any other viable applicant in the event that a transaction more
favorable to the Unitholders were subsequently proposed), prior to March 10,
1998. In order to permit the Proposal to be considered and voted on at the
Special Meeting, HHC further extended the "Holiday Inn" franchises for the
Inns to June 10, 1998.
Beginning in late February, 1998, Servico made open market and
privately negotiated purchases of Units and, as of the Record Date (referred
to below), owned and had the right to vote in excess of 2,000,000 Units.
Servico, SAC and Operating Partners then entered into an amendment dated as of
March 12, 1998 to the Original Acquisition Agreement (as so amended, the
"Acquisition Agreement") to, among other things, increase the Purchase Price
from $8,000,000 to $12,000,000. In early April 1998, Servico purchased 441,500
Units held by Field and certain related or associated persons. In connection
with those transactions, the Partnership agreed to pay Field or his designee a
fee of $500,000 (the "Field Payment") and all parties agreed to exchange
mutual releases. The Partnership understood that Field paid, or would pay or
reimburse, various fees, costs, expenses and expenditures in connection with
the DMC proxy solicitation.
On May 5, 1998, the General Partner gave notice of a Special Meeting
of Limited Partners of the Partnership to be held on May 28, 1998 to consider
and vote on (a) the sale of the Interest to SAC pursuant to the Acquisition
Agreement (the "Sale") and (b) the dissolution and liquidation of the
Partnership following the Sale, pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation (together,
the "Proposal"). Accompanying the notice of the Special Meeting was a Proxy
Statement dated May 5, 1998, which described the matters to be considered at
the Special Meeting. Persons who, at the close of business on March 16, 1998
(the "Record Date"), were the beneficial owners of Units were entitled to
notice of, and to vote on the Proposal. The making of the Field Payment was
not required to be, and was not, submitted to a vote at the Special Meeting,
but the Proxy Statement disclosed that if the Proposal was approved the Field
Payment would be made from the Purchase Price.
At the Special Meeting, there were 2,183,851 votes in favor, and
8,330 votes against, the Proposal and 4,310 votes abstaining (which was
equivalent to a vote against). On May 28, 1998, immediately following the
Special Meeting, the Partnership sold the Interest to SAC and adopted the Plan
of Liquidation. Simultaneously, the General Partner sold its 1% general
partnership interest in Operating Partners to Servico. In connection with the
sale of the General Partner's interest in Operating Partners, the General
Partner and its parent, Prime, waived any right they might have to receive any
distribution from the Partnership of the proceeds of the sale of the Interest.
Upon the consummation of the Sale and the adoption of the Plan of Liquidation,
the Partnership dissolved and began to wind up its affairs
Because Servico then owned 2,450,819 Units and would have been
entitled to liquidating distributions from the Partnership, Servico and the
Partnership agreed that Servico would transfer to the Partnership $5,700,000
in cash of the $12,000,000 Purchase Price (with the result that Servico in
effect retained a liquidating distribution of $2.57 per Unit owned by Servico)
and that Servico would pay to the Partnership any amount necessary to make
distributions to all holders of Units proportionate. In addition, Servico
would be entitled to share proportionately in any distributions in excess of
$2.60 per Unit to Unitholders other than Servico.
On August 6, 1998, the General Partner fixed the record date for
liquidating distributions by the Partnership. Only persons (other than
Servico, which, having already effectively received its liquidating
distribution, will not receive any liquidating distribution unless and until
the distributions to other holders of Units exceeds $2.60 per Unit) who, at
the close of business on August 7, 1998, were the holders of record of Units
(the "Record Holders") would be entitled to liquidating distributions.
Although transfers of Units after August 7, 1998 were not prohibited and were
recognized on the books of the Transfer Agent, only Record Holders would
receive liquidating distributions. As a result, transferees of Units after
August 7, 1998 would not receive any distributions from the Partnership. On
August 14, 1998, the Partnership made an initial liquidating distribution of
$2.00 per Unit.
Subsequent to the Partnership's sale of the Interest and receipt of
the Purchase Price, different creditors of Martin W. Field filed law suits in
New York and New Jersey, and served court papers in Ohio and Florida, seeking
to direct the Partnership to pay the Field Payment to them (to the exclusion
of Mr. Field and other creditors). Although the Partnership is merely a
stakeholder, it is subject to potentially conflicting directions by different
courts. Both the New Jersey court and the New York court issued orders
prohibiting the transfer by the Partnership of the funds representing the
Field Payment. The Partnership has had to appear in those proceedings (and to
expend Partnership funds in connection with those appearances) in order to
assure that the interests of, and assets distributable to, the Record Holders
were protected. In addition, the New Jersey and New York court orders
prohibiting the Partnership's transfer of the funds representing the Field
Payment effectively prevents the liquidation of the Partnership before
resolution of the dispute by Mr. Field's creditors or an agreement of those
creditors to an escrow of the funds representing the Field Payment.
The Partnership had expected to file its final tax return and pay all
entity level taxes payable by the Partnership, pay all remaining expenses of
the Partnership, prepare and distribute final reports to the holders of Units,
make the final liquidating distribution to the Record Holders, terminate the
registration of the Partnership under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
cancel the Partnership's Certificate of Limited Partnership under the Delaware
Act before the end of 1998. However, the Partnership was unable to complete
the preparation of its Federal income tax returns in 1998 because the Internal
Revenue Service had not completed or distributed before year end new form
required to be filed by "large partnerships," such as the Partnership.
On December 18, 1998, the Partnership deposited in escrow the
estimated amount of entity level taxes payable by the Partnership and a
reserve for legal and accounting expenses to complete the liquidation of the
Partnership and a reserve for contingencies and unforeseen expenses. At that
time, the Partnership distributed to the Record Holders an additional
liquidating distribution of $0.55 per Unit, with the balance, if any, of the
liquidating distributions to be made to the Record Holders when the
Partnership completed winding up its affairs and canceling its existence.
Until May 28, 1998, the operation of the Inns was supervised from
W&H's regional office at 301 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
and certain administrative functions were performed for the Partnership by W&H
from its principal offices at 4243 Hunt Road, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242.
Subsequent to that time, administrative functions were performed for the
Partnership by the General Partner.
In the transition of management and administrative responsibilities,
compounded by a misunderstanding by the effect on the reporting obligations of
the Partnership following the Sale and the dissolution of the Partnership, no
provision was made for the timely audit of the books and records of the
Partnerships. As a result, the Partnership has been late in filing the annual
report for the year ended December 31, 1998 and the quarterly reports for the
quarters ended March 31, 1999, June 30, 1999 and September 30, 1999.
The Transfer Agent for the Partnership is First Chicago Trust Company
of New York. Their address is P.O. Box 2536, Jersey City, New Jersey
07303-2536.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
At January 1, 1998, the properties of the Partnerships consisted of
15 Inns, each of which had been purchased by Operating Partners from
subsidiaries of Prime in December , 1986, as described under Item 1,
"Business." The Inns, each of which was franchised as a "Holiday Inn," were
located in Maryland, Pennsylvania and Connecticut. The franchises with HHC
expired, or were to have expired, on various dates as summarized in the
following table.
Each of the Inns was located near an interstate highway or major
traffic artery, or in a city's business district, providing both visibility
and accessibility to travelers. All of the Inns contained a full service
restaurant and lounge, which offered food and beverages throughout the day,
and meeting rooms with sound equipment and banquet facilities. Each of the
Inns had on-site parking and a swimming pool.
Operating Partners sold the Baltimore Pikesville Inn on May 1, 1998
for a gross sale price of $2,400,000. From that price, Operating Partners paid
customary expenses of sale (including survey costs, legal fees, transfer taxes
and brokerage commissions), the fee payable to W&H under the W&H Management
Agreement, expenses of asbestos remediation and clean-up, and expenses of the
removal of the "Holiday Inn" signs. The balance was applied to pay the 2%
prepayment penalty on, and to reduce the outstanding principal balance of, the
Priming Loan. No amount of the sale proceeds was available for distribution to
the holders of Units.
The following table presents certain information concerning the Inns:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER FRANCHISE STATUS OF OWNERSHIP
LOCATION YEAR OPENED OF ROOMS EXPIRATION DATE BY OPERATING PARTNERS
MARYLAND
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Baltimore Inner Harbor 1964 375 Dec. 31, 2005 Land and building lease
Baltimore Washington 1973(1) 259 June 30, 1997(2) Land and building lease
International Airport
Frederick 1963(3) 157 June 30, 1997(2) Fee
Baltimore-Cromwell 1972 139 Dec. 31, 1997(2) Fee
Bridge Rd.
Baltimore-Moravia Road(4) 1974 139 Dec. 31, 1997(2) Fee
Baltimore-Belmont Blvd. 1973 135 Dec. 31, 2001 Fee
Baltimore-Glen Burnie No. 1973 128 Dec. 31, 1999 Land Lease
PENNSYLVANIA
Lancaster-Route 30 1971 189 June 30, 1997(2) Land Lease and Fee
Lancaster-Route 501(4) 1964 160 June 30, 1997(2) Land Lease
York-Market Street(4) 1964 120 June 30, 1997(2) Land Lease
York-Arsenal Road 1970 100 Dec. 31, 1998 Fee
Hazleton(4) 1969 107 June 30, 1997(2) Fee
CONNECTICUT
New Haven 1965 160 June 30, 1997(2) Fee
East Hartford 1974 130 June 30, 1997(2) Land and building lease
SUB-TOTAL 2,298
Baltimore-Glen Burnie So. 1965 100 June 30, 1997 Sold July 29, 1997
Baltimore-Pikesville 1963 108 June 30, 1997 Sold May 1, 1998
TOTAL 2,506
</TABLE>
(1) 96 room addition completed in 1985
(2) Franchise extended to May 9, 1998
(3) 63 room addition completed in 1985
(4) Listed for sale
The terms of the leases (including options exercised) expired at
various dates ranging from 2000 through 2024. Some of the leases contained
purchase options to acquire title, with options to extend the leases for terms
varying from ten to forty years. Five of the leases were subject to rental
adjustments based upon inflation indexes. The leases generally required
Operating Partners to pay the cost of repairs, insurance, and real estate
taxes.
Each of the properties was subject to mortgage liens securing the
Priming Loan and the Mortgage Loan. Each Mortgage Note was
cross-collateralized and secured by all of the Inns. In addition, the land and
building under lease in the Baltimore Washington International Airport Inn was
subject to an additional mortgage held by the ground lessor.
On May 28, 1998, the Partnership sold the Interest, subject to the
outstanding indebtedness and other obligations of Operating Partners, to SAC
for $12,000,000 ($5,700,000 of which was paid in cash and $6,300,000 of which,
subject to adjustment, was credited to the account of Servico, as a holder of
Units). Since May 28, 1998, the only assets of the Partnership have been the
undistributed proceeds of the sale of the Interest.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Creditors of Martin W. Field filed law suits in New York and New
Jersey, and served court papers in Ohio and Florida, seeking to direct the
Partnership to pay the Fields Payment to them. Although the Partnership is
merely a stakeholder, it is subject to potentially conflicting directions by
different courts. The Partnership has appeared in those proceedings in order
to assure that the interests of, and assets distributable to, the Record
Holders were protected.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF UNITHOLDERS
On May 28, 1998, at the Special Meeting, the holders of Units
approved the Proposal by a vote of 2,183,851 to 12,640 (consisting of 8,330
votes against and 4,310 abstensions), as described in Item 1, "Business,"
above.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S UNITS AND RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS
(a) The Units were traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE")
from the initial public offering through June 19, 1997. Effective before the
opening of the market on June 20, 1997, the Units were delisted by the NYSE
because the aggregate market value of the Units, the three-year average net
income of the Partnership and the net tangible assets of the Partnership
available to the Units fell below the NYSE's continued listing criteria. From
June 20, 1997 through July 8, 1997, the Units were traded by brokers who made
a market in the Units and since July 9, 1997, the Units have been traded on
the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (the "OTCBB") under the ticker symbol
"PMPI". Set forth below for each quarter since January 1, 1996 are the high
and low reported sale price per Unit on the NYSE (as reported in the Wall
Street Journal) through June 19, 1997, the high and low reported price quoted
by brokers (as reported by National Quotation Bureau, Inc.) from June 20, 1997
through July 8, 1997, and the reported high ask and low bid price quoted on
the OTCBB (as reported by IDD Informational Services, Tradeline) since July 9,
1997.
High Low
1996:
First Quarter 13/16 7/16
Second Quarter 1-1/8 9/16
Third Quarter 1 5/8
Fourth Quarter 15/16 5/8
1997:
First Quarter 1 5/8
Second Quarter (through June 19) 1 9/16
Second Quarter (from June 20) 1 1/2
Third Quarter (through July 8) 1 3/4
Third Quarter (from July 9) 2-1/2 3/8
Fourth Quarter 2-15/16 1-3/4
1998:
First Quarter 3-1/2 1-15/16
Second Quarter 2-15/16 1-1/2
Third Quarter 2-7/16 3/16
Fourth Quarter 1/2 1/16
(b) On October 31, 1999, there were 1,326 holders of record of the
Partnership's Units.
(c) Prior to August 14, 1998, no dividends had been declared or
distributed since 1990. Prior to the sale of the Interest on May 28, 1998, the
Partnership's cash flow, which was dependent on revenues from operations of
the Inns, had been insufficient to maintain quarterly distributions. In
addition, under the Priming Loan Agreement and the Mortgage Loan Agreement,
the Partnership was prohibited from making any distributions to holders of
Units until the Priming Loan was repaid, Mortgage Note payments were
maintained and proper reserves had been funded as required. On August 14, 1998
the Partnership made a partial liquidating distribution to Record Holders of
$2.00 per Unit and on December 18, 1998 the Partnership made an additional
liquidating distribution to Record Holders of $0.55 per Unit. The balance, if
any, of the liquidating distributions to Record Holders will be made when the
Partnership has completed winding up its affairs and canceling its existence.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998(a) 1997 (b) 1996 (b) 1995 (b) 1994 (b)
Operating Data:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues (c) $19,256 $ 50,352 $ 49,584 $ 47,469 $ 44,173
Net income (loss) 31,585 (3,330) (2,188) (2,280) (4,673)
Net income (loss)
Allocated to limited
Partners 30,493 (3,297) (2,166) (2,257) (4,626)
Net income (loss)
Allocated to limited
Partners per Unit $ 7.62 $ (0.82) $ (0.54) $ (0.56) $ (1.16)
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets $ 1,739 $ 51,707 $ 53,972 $ 57,001 $ 60,673
Long-term debt, net
of current maturities $ -- 63,544 65,691 65,645 66,627
Partners' equity $ 134 $(21,251) $(17,921) $(15,733) $(13,453)
(deficit)
</TABLE>
(a) Operating Data and Balance Sheet Data for the year ended December 31,
1998 reflect operations of the Inns through May 28, 1998 (including
Operating Partners' sale of the Baltimore Pikesville Inn on May 1, 1998)
and the interim investment of the undistributed proceeds of the sale of
the Interest subsequent to May 28, 1998.
(b) W&H accounts for all properties under its management on a 52/53 week year
(1994, 1995 and 1997 were 52 week years and 1996 was a 53 week year) that
is closed for bookkeeping purposes on the Friday nearest to December 31
of any given year. As a result, the fiscal year of Operating Partners for
1997 ended January 2, 1998; for 1996 ended January 3, 1997; for 1995
ended December 29, 1995; and for 1994, December 30, 1994.
(c) Includes $310,000, $362,000, $361,000, $374,000 and $341,000 for the years
ended December 31, 1998 1997, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, of other
income (principally interest income). In addition, it includes $1,025,000
for the year ended December 31, 1995 of non-recurring revenue from the
settlement of claims by the Partnerships against Prime and AMI Management
in the Prime bankruptcy.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
The Inns' room statistics are as follows:
1998(a) 1997 1996 1995 1994
Average Average Average Average Average
Occupancy Daily Occupancy Daily Occupancy Daily Occupancy Daily Occupancy Daily
Percentage Room Rate Percentage Room Rate Percentage Room Rate Percentage Room Rate Percentage Room Rate
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1st Quarter 51.1% $71.08 48.9% $66.94 45.3% $63.76 $59.84 47.8% $56.33 48.0%
2nd Quarter 68.9% $77.98 70.0% $73.95 68.7% $69.50 $64.74 69.4% $61.79 69.4%
3rd Quarter - - 72.8% $75.01 72.4% $71.44 $67.06 72.2% $61.10 72.7%
4th Quarter - - 55.6% $72.64 57.2% $67.54 $62.51 56.8% $58.72 57.5%
Full Year NA NA 61.8% $72.56 60.8% $68.53 $63.95 61.6% $59.82 61.9%
</TABLE>
(a) Reflects operations of the Inns through May 28, 1998 (including
Operating Partners' sale of the Baltimore Pikesville Inn on May
1, 1998).
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating Partners sold the Glen Burnie South Inn in July, 1997, sold
the Baltimore Pikesville Inn in May 1998, had listed for sale the
Baltimore-Moravia Road, Lancaster-Rt. 501, York-Market Street and Hazleton
Inns, and had intended to sell (but, at the request of Servico, had taken off
the market) the Baltimore-Belmont and Frederick Inns. These Inns are "highway
oriented" properties that, having exterior corridors and being older
properties, have a dated appearance and were either losing money or, in the
opinion of the General Partner, would not produce a sufficient return to
justify the costs to complete the PIPs and the franchise fees for renewal of
their "Holiday Inn" franchises. The proceeds of the sale of the Glen Burnie
South and Baltimore Pikesville Inns were, and the net sale proceeds of these
Inns would have been applied to reduce the outstanding principal balance of
the Priming and Mortgage Loan, as required by the Priming and Mortgage Loan
Agreements.
So long as the Partnership owned the Interest, the Partnership's
investment in the Inns continued to be subject to the risks generally incident
to the ownership of real estate, including those relating to the uncertainty
of cash flow to meet fixed obligations, adverse changes in national economic
conditions, adverse changes in local market conditions, construction of new
hotels and/or the franchising by HHC of competitor hotels, changes in interest
rates, the availability of financing for operating or capital needs, the
availability of suitable franchise affiliations, changes in real estate tax
rates and other operating expenses, adverse changes in governmental rules and
fiscal policies, acts of God, condemnation and other factors beyond the
control of the General Partner, the Partnership, Operating Partners and W&H.
Until the end of September, 1997, it had been the intention of
Operating Partners to continue to operate the Inns as going concerns. In late
September, the General Partner entered into negotiations with Servico for the
sale of the Interest and, on November 7, 1997, following efforts to arrange
financing for the PIPs for the Inns or to otherwise protect the interests of
the holders of Units, the Partnership signed a definitive agreement (amended
on March 12, 1998) with Servico and SAC to sell the Interest to SAC. The
Acquisition Agreement was approved by the Unitholders at the Special Meeting
and, on May 28, 1998, pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, SAC paid $12
million to the Partnership ($5,700,000 of which was paid in cash and
$6,300,000 of which, subject to adjustment, was credited to the account of
Servico, as a holder of Units) and acquired the Interest subject to the
outstanding indebtedness and other obligations of Operating Partners. On May
28, 1998 Servico acquired the 1% general partnership interest of the General
Partner in Operating Partners. The General Partner and Prime waived all rights
that they might have had to receive any distributions by the Partnership of
the proceeds of the sale of the Interest ("Proceeds").
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Prior to May 29, 1998, the Partnership derived its income from its
Interest in Operating Partners, whose income was derived from the operations
of the Inns. Operating Partners received all lodging and other revenues
derived from, and was responsible for the payment of all expenses directly
attributable to, the operation of the Inns. Set forth below is information as
to lodging and food and beverage revenues and expenses generated from the
operations of the Inns (in thousands). : Operating revenues and direct
operating expenses of the Inns for 1997 reflect operations of fifteen Inns for
twelve months and operations of the Baltimore Glen Burnie South Inn for seven
months (prior to its sale on July 29, 1997), and for 1998 reflect operations
of fourteen Inns for five months (through the sale of the Interest on May 28,
1998) and operations of the Baltimore Pikesville Inn for four months (prior to
its sale on May 1, 1998).
1998 1997 1996
Operating revenues:
Lodging $ 15,266 $ 40,852 $ 39,488
Food & beverage 3,680 9,138 9,735
Totals 18,946 49,990 49,223
Direct operating expenses:
Lodging 3,672 9,622 9,462
Food & beverage 3,103 7,827 8,112
Marketing 1,406 3,521 3,500
Utilities 1,046 2,896 3,053
Repairs & maintenance 1,300 3,600 3,680
Rent 560 1,304 1,316
Insurance 365 771 705
Property taxes 551 1,395 1,382
Other 3,424 8,644 8,369
Totals 15,427 39,580 39,579
Operating revenues in excess
of direct operating expenses 3,519 $ 10,410 $ 9,644
Total revenues for 1998 were $19,256,000, as compared to $50,352,000
for 1997. The variance in revenues between the years is due to (a) 1998
including the operations of fourteen Inns for only five months (as a result of
the sale of the Interest on May 28, 1998), compared to twelve months in 1997,
(b) 1998 including the operations of the Baltimore Pikesville Inn for only
four months (as a result of the sale of that Inn on May 1, 1998), compared to
twelve months in 1997, and (c) 1998 not including any operations of the
Baltimore Glen Burnie South Inn (as a result of the sale of that Inn in July,
1997), compared to seven months in 1997. Total revenues increased to
$50,352,000 in 1997, from $49,584,000 in 1996. The increase in revenues in
1997 would have been larger but for the fact that operations for 1997
reflected only seven months of operations of the Baltimore Glen Burnie South
Inn, compared to twelve months in 1996.
The following table compares lodging revenues, occupancy percentage
levels and Average Daily Room Rate ("ADR") for 1998, 1997 and 1996 (lodging
revenues, occupancy percentage and ADR for 1997 reflect twelve months of
operations for fifteen Inns and seven months of operations for the Baltimore
Glen Burnie South Inn, and for 1998 reflect five months of operations of
fourteen Inns and four months of operations of the Baltimore Pikesville Inn).
1998 1997 1996
Lodging revenues (in thousands) $ 15,266 $ 40,852 $ 39,488
Occupancy percentage 57.8% 61.8% 60.8%
ADR $ 74.17 $ 72.56 $ 68.53
Because the Partnership engaged, through Operating Partners, in
operations for only the first five months in 1998 and the first three or four
months of the year have lower occupancies than later months, the occupancy of
the Inns in 1998 is not comparable to occupancies in earlier years. The
continued increase in the ADRs at the Inns had been accomplished by attracting
and maintaining the higher ADR market segments (hotel guests categorized as
individual business, leisure and government guests, etc. and groups such as
corporate, association, tours, crews, etc.). Attracting and maintaining the
higher ADR segments had been accomplished by increased marketing and sales
promotions and the increased attractiveness of the Inns as a result of the
capital improvement program completed in 1994 and the continuation of capital
improvements during 1995, 1996 and 1997. Occupancy at the Inns increased 1.0%,
to 61.8%, in 1997, compared to 60.8% in 1996. The increase in occupancy was
attributable in part to the of fair weather conditions in the first quarter of
1997, as compared to the harsh winter weather in the first quarter of 1996,
and to the stable and growing economic conditions and the increase in business
and leisure travel during 1997.
Because the Partnership engaged, through Operating Partners, in
operations for only first five months in 1998, the revenues in 1998 are not
comparable to revenues in earlier years. Food and beverage revenues declined
to $9,138,000 in 1997 from $9,735,000 in 1996. The decline was partially
attributable to the loss in food and beverage sales in the fourth quarter of
1997 (approximately $90,000) from the sale of the Glen Burnie South Inn.
During the third and fourth quarter of 1997, breakfast, lunch, dinner and
banquet revenues declined substantially, largely as a result of the Inns'
inability to retain their respective share of the food and beverage market,
due to increased restaurant and bar competition. The decline in banquet
revenues was partially offset by increased meeting room business, which tends
to generate more lodging business, reflected in increased occupancies (and the
increased revenues from that use) by the higher rated market segments that the
Inns have attracted.
Because of the Partnership's limited operations in 1998, there cannot
be any meaningful comparison of direct operating expenses or general and
administrative expenses in 1998 with those in 1997. Direct operating expenses
were $39,580,000 in 1997, as compared to $39,579,000 in 1996. Food and
beverage expenses decreased, primarily as a result of the decrease in food and
beverage sales. Increases in marketing expenses, such as advertising costs and
hotel promotions, were incurred in an effort to attract and maintain the
higher rated market segments. The utility costs decreased in 1997 as a result
of the milder weather as compared to 1996. The repair and maintenance costs
decreased in 1997 over 1996, although repair and maintenance costs generally
are reflective of the age of the Inns. Insurance costs increased due to
general liability and property insurance rate increases. The increases in
other expenses, included in direct operating expenses, reflect higher
administrative and general expenses directly incurred in the operations of the
Inns, such as administrative labor, employment and training costs, protection
expense, and in costs that vary with revenues, such as franchise fees paid to
HHC, management fees paid to W&H, and credit card commissions.
Other general and administrative costs increased in 1997 due to the
additional time and expense incurred with respect to the franchise renewals,
review and negotiation of the PIP's and related costs and financing, the
Servico transaction and other matters. Depreciation and amortization expense
decreased in 1997 due to assets becoming fully depreciated in 1997. In
addition, property and equipment expenditures decreased in 1997 as a result of
the negotiations with HHC over the PIPs. Interest expense decreased in 1997 as
a result of the lower principal amount of the Tranche A portion of the Priming
Loan following the application of the net proceeds from the sale of the Glen
Burnie South Inn in July, 1997 to reduction of the Tranche A Loan. For 1997,
the Partnerships recorded $4,500,000 as additional interest and incentive
management fees under the Mortgage Loan and the W&H Management Agreement.
The Partnership had net income of $31,585,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1998, as compared to a loss of $3,330,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1997 and a net loss of $2,188,000 for the year ended December 31,
1996. The 1998 net income includes a net gain of $35,621,000 on the sale of
the Interest to SAC, and a net gain of $805,000 on the sale of the Baltimore
Pikesville Inn. The Partnerships' net loss for the year ended December 31,
1997 included an expense for accrued shared appreciation of $4,500,000 and
$1,011,000 of gain on the sale of the Baltimore Glen Burnie South Inn. Net
income for 1997 before the expense for accrued shared appreciation and the
gain on sale of the Glen Burnie South Inn was $159,000.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The changes in cash and cash equivalents are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ (27) $ 2,807 $ 2,317
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 4,462 (456) (2,275)
Net cash used in financing activities (4,282) (2,196) --
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents $ 187 $ 155 $ 42
</TABLE>
In 1996, cash from operating activities exceeded cash used for
operating expenses of the Inns and of the Partnerships, which resulted in net
cash being provided by operating activities.
Cash used in investing activities was $2,275,000 in 1996, which
included $1,880,000 of additions to property and equipment, and $395,000 of
increases in restricted cash. The restricted cash accounts included the net
increase in the FF&E Reserve of $364,000 (funding plus interest earned of
$2,517,000, less capital expenditures of $2,153,000) and increases of $31,000
in the interest reserve and tax escrow accounts.
Operating Partners borrowed $1,600,000 under the Tranche B Loan to
supplement operating cash flow deficiencies during the first quarter of 1996.
The entire Tranche B Loan was repaid from excess working capital prior to the
end of the third quarter of 1996.
In 1997, cash from operating activities exceeded cash used for
operating expenses of the Inns and of the Partnerships, which resulted in net
cash being provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating
activities increased in 1997, as compared to 1996, as a result of increased
revenues from operations.
Cash used in investing activities was $456,000 in 1997, which
included additions to property and equipment of $1,519,000 and increases in
restricted cash of $1,176,000, offset by the net proceeds from the sale of the
Baltimore Glen Burnie South Inn of $2,239,000. The restricted cash accounts
included the net increase in the FF&E Reserve of $970,000 (funding plus
interest earned of $2,604,000 less capital expenditures of $1,634,000) and
increases of $206,000 in the interest reserve and tax escrow accounts.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $2,196,000 in 1997,
from the payment of a portion of the Tranche A Loan from the net proceeds of
the sale of the Baltimore Glen Burnie South Inn. Operating Partners borrowed
$1,600,000 under the Tranche B Loan to supplement operating cash flow
deficiencies during the first quarter of 1997. The entire Tranche B Loan was
repaid from excess working capital prior to the end of the second quarter of
1997.
In 1998, cash used for operating expenses exceeded cash from
operating activities of the Inns and of the Partnerships, which resulted in
net cash being used for operating activities.
Cash provided by investing activities in 1998 was $4,462,000, which
included $2,098,000 from the sale of the Baltimore Pikesville Inn and
$5,700,000 from the sale of the Interest, offset by $2,184,000 of cash of
Operating Partners acquired by SAC in the Sale, $87,000 of additions to
property and equipment, and $1,065,000 of increases in restricted cash.
Net cash used in financing activities in 1998 was $4,248,000, which
included $298,000 from the payment of a portion of the Tranche A Loan from the
net proceeds of the sale of the Baltimore Pikesville Inn and $3,950,000 of
liquidating distributions to Record Holders. Operating Partners borrowed
$1,800,000 under the Tranche B Loan to supplement operating cash flow
deficiencies during the first quarter of 1998. The entire Tranche B Loan was
repaid by May 29, 1998.
On May 28, 1998, the Partnership sold the Interest and, since that
time, its only assets have been the undistributed Proceeds. The Partnership
intends to file all applicable tax returns and to pay all entity level taxes,
to make the Field Payment (or conclude arrangements for the escrow of the
Field Payment and release by the creditors of Mr. Field), to pay all remaining
expenses of administration and liquidation of the Partnership, to terminate
its registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to distribute to
the Record Holders any funds remaining after paying the expenses of winding up
and liquidation, and to cancel its existence under the Delaware Revised
Uniform Limited Partnership Act. The Partnership has distributed $2.55 per
Unit to the Record Holders and there can be no assurance that there will be
any further liquidating distributions.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, a publicly traded partnership, such
as the Partnership, is taxable as a corporation unless it satisfies certain
conditions. However, subject to various limitations, publicly traded
partnerships in existence on December 17, 1987 were generally exempt from
taxation as a corporation until after 1997. However, a publicly traded
partnership which added a substantial new line of business was not eligible
for such exemption and it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service could
contend that the Partnership should have been taxed as a corporation after
November 29, 1990, the date of the termination of the Lease. The Partnership
did not receive any indication from the Internal Revenue Service that the
Partnership should have been taxed as a corporation. If the Partnership had
been taxable as a corporation, its operating losses would have eliminated any
tax liability.
Effective on January 1, 1998, the Partnership would have been treated
as a corporation for Federal income tax purposes, unless the Partnership had
made an election to be treated as an "electing partnership". The General
Partner made this election in 1998. As an electing partnership, the
Partnership was still treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes
but was subject to a 3.5% tax on all gross income earned by the Partnership.
At December 31, 1998, the Partnership had $1,739,000 of assets, all
of which were cash or cash equivalents and other current assets, and
liabilities of $1,605,000, of which $1,008,000 was income taxes payable and
$513,000 was the Field Payment and interest accrued thereon. At the beginning
of January, 1999, the Partnership segregated $513,000 for the Field Payment
and in April, 1999, the Partnership applied $1,008,000 to payment of its
Federal income taxes.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Schedules included in
Item 14(a).
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Certain information is set forth below concerning the directors and
officers of the General Partner, each of whom has been elected or appointed to
serve until his successor is duly elected and qualified. The Unitholders of
the Partnership do not have voting rights with respect to the election of
directors of the General Partner.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Present Position with the General Partner
Name Age and Business Experience for Past Five Years
<S> <C> <C>
S. Leonard Okin 65 Vice President and Director of the General Partner since inception;
Consultant under the Consulting Services Agreement since January 1, 1994
(1).
Robert A. Familant 47 Director of the General Partner since August 19, 1994; Treasurer and CEO
of Progressive Credit Union (credit union) since prior to 1989 (2).
Seymour G. Siegel 56 Director of the General Partner since November 21, 1994; President of
Siegel Rich, Inc. (consulting firm) since January 1, 1994; Senior Partner
of M.R. Weiser & Co. (accounting firm) from prior to 1989 (3).
</TABLE>
(1) In 1994, with the approval of the Lenders, Mr. Okin entered into a
Consulting Services Agreement (the "Consulting Services Agreement") with
the Partnerships and the General Partner, giving him authority to make
day to day operating decisions for the Inns.
(2) Mr. Familant was elected and approved as an outside Director of the
General Partner effective August 19, 1994.
(3) Mr. Siegel was elected and approved as an outside Director of the General
Partner effective November 21, 1994.
Under the Consulting Services Agreement, Mr. Okin, as an independent
contractor, performed on behalf of the Partnership, Operating Partners and the
General Partner, the services normally performed by, and exercised the
authority normally assumed or undertaken by, the chief executive officer of a
corporation. The Consulting Services Agreement was effective December 1, 1994
through December 31, 1995, and was extended automatically for successive
twelve-month periods thereafter unless, not less than 30 days prior to the end
of any year, the Partnership, Operating Partners or the General Partner gave
written notice to Mr. Okin of their election not to renew the agreement at the
expiration of the then term. The Consulting Services Agreement was also
terminable, among other things, by 60 days prior written notice from Mr. Okin
to the General Partner of Mr. Okin's election at any time to terminate the
agreement; and at any time by Mr. Okin if the Partnership, Operating Partners
and the General Partner for any reason were not able to maintain in place
specified liability insurance coverage for Mr. Okin.
Under the Acquisition Agreement, Servico assumed the compensation and
termination payment obligations of the Partnership under the Consulting
Services Agreement. The Consulting Services Agreement had been extended from
year to year through December 31, 1998 and, notice of termination not having
been received by Mr. Okin from the Partnership, the General Partner, Operating
Partners, Servico (as successor to Operating Partners) or Lodgian Inc.
("Lodgian") (as successor to Servico) on or prior to December 2, 1998, was
understood by Mr. Okin to have been extended to December 31, 1999. Mr. Okin
was advised by Lodgian that it believed that the Consulting Services Agreement
had been terminated and that it had no further payment obligations to Mr.
Okin. During 1999, Mr. Okin and Lodgian settled the dispute between them.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As the only person performing services to the Partnerships comparable
to the services of an officer, Mr. Okin was required to devote substantial
time and effort to manage the Partnerships. The following table sets forth Mr.
Okin's compensation paid in respect of the fiscal years ended December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996.
Summary Compensation Table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and Other Annual Long Term All Other
Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation Compensation Compensation
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
S. Leonard Okin 1998 $ 134,890 $ - $ - $ - $ -
(Consultant) 1997 $ 133,560 $ - $ - $ - $ -
1996 $ 126,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
</TABLE>
Mr. Okin receives compensation under the Consulting Services
Agreement. Of Mr. Okin's salary in 1998, $93,990 was paid by the Partnerships
and $40,900 was paid by or for the account of Servico (or Lodgian, as its
successor). In addition, Mr. Okin received reimbursement for out-of-pocket
expenses in 1998, 1997 and 1996 totaling approximately $46,540 ($33,160 of
which was paid by the Partnerships and $13,380 of which was paid by Servico
and Lodgian), $36,100 and $27,300, respectively (for office rent, secretarial
services, utilities, airfare, postage, office supplies, etc.) and $14,000,
$19,000 and $18,500, respectively, for attendance at board meetings.
Directors are currently paid a fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting
attended in New York and $1,500 for each meeting out of town, plus out of
pocket expenses incurred for attending meetings.
Beginning in 1996, the Partnerships have retained the services of
Siegel Rich, Inc., a consulting firm in which Seymour G. Siegel is a
shareholder. In 1997 and 1996, the Partnerships paid Siegel Rich, Inc.,
approximately $44,000 and $16,000, respectively. No amounts were paid to
Siegel Rich, Inc. in 1998.
ITEM 12. SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 1998, the number
of Units owned by the officers and directors of the General Partner and by all
persons owning of record or, to the knowledge of the Partnership, beneficially
more than 5% of the outstanding Units. The General Partner does not own any
Units.
Ownership of Units
Percentage
Number of Units
Name & Address of Owner of Units Held Outstanding
S. Leonard Okin
c/o Prime-American Realty Corp.
P.O. Box 230
Hawthorne, NJ 07507-0230 1,000 0.025%
Lodgian Inc.
345 Peachtree Road, N. E.
Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30326 2,450,819(1) 61.270%
- ----------------
(1) Includes 2,445,819 Units held in an account in the name of Servico,
and 5,000 Units held in an account in the name of by Jerome Sanzo,
which the Partnership understands are beneficially owned by Lodgian (as
successor to Servico).
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
During 1998, 1997 and 1996, Mr. Okin received $195,430 , $188,660 and
$171,800, respectively, from the Partnerships as cash compensation for his
services, and reimbursement of expenses, under the Consulting Services
Agreement. During 1997 and 1996, Siegel Rich, Inc., a consulting firm in which
Seymour G. Siegel is a shareholder, was paid approximately $44,000 and
$16,000, receptively, for services to the Partnerships. No amounts were paid
to Siegel Rich, Inc. in 1998. See Item 10 and 11 above.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
The Financial Statements and Schedules listed in the
accompanying index on page 27 to financial statements are filed as
part of this Form 10-K.
3. Exhibits
(2) (b) Agreed order of the
Florida Bankruptcy Court approving
rejection of the Lease, the Guarantee and
a related agreement included as Exhibit
(2) (b) to the Partnership's 1990 Annual
Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein
by reference.
(2) (c) Acquisition Agreement
among Servico, the Partnership, the
General Partner and SAC, dated as of
November 7, 1997 included as Exhibit 1 to
the Partnership's Current Report on Form
8-K dated November 21, 1997 is
incorporated herein by reference.
(2) (d) First Amendment to
Acquisition Agreement among Servico, the
Partnership, the General Partner and SAC,
dated as of March 12, 1998, included as
Appendix A to the Partnership's Proxy
Statement dated May 5, 1998 is
incorporated herein by reference.
(2) (e) Plan and Agreement of
Dissolution and Liquidation dated as of
May 28, 1998 of the Partnership included
as Appendix B to the Partnership's Proxy
Statement dated may 5, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(3) (a) Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership included as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 33-9595) (The "Registration
Statement") is incorporated herein by
reference.
(3) (b) Certificate of Limited
Partnership of the Partnership included as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement
is incorporated herein by reference.
(3) (c) Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Operating Partners, included as Exhibit
3.3 to the Registration Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
(3) (d) Certificate of Limited
Partnership of Operating Partners included
as Exhibit 3.6 to the Registration
Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
(4) (a) Form of Deposit Agreement
included as Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registration Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10) (a) Form of Lease included as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement
is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (b) Form of Management
Agreement included as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registration Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10) (c) Form of Purchase and Sale
Agreement included as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registration Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10) (d) Form of Note Purchase and
Loan Agreement included as Exhibit 10.4 to
the Registration Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10) (e) Form of Service Contract
included as Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registration Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10) (f) Form of Undertaking
included as Exhibit 10.6 to the
Registration Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10) (g) Form of Guaranty included
as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registration
Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (h) Management Agreement
among Operating Partners, Sixteen Hotels,
Inc., and W&H, dated January 4, 1990,
included as Exhibit (10) (h) to the
Partnership's 1990 Annual Report on Form
10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (i) Sixth Amendment to the
Replacement Management Agreement among
Operating Partners Sixteen Hotels, Inc.
and W&H, as Manager, to be effective
January 4, 1997 included as Exhibit 10( )
to the Partnership's 1996 Annual Report on
Form 10-K is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (j) Loan Agreement among
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
Company, Century Life of America and
Jackson National Life Insurance Company
(collectively, the "Priming Lenders"), as
lenders, Operating Partners, as borrower
and Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., Agent
(the "Agent") dated as of February 28,
1992 included as Exhibit (10) (i) to the
Partnership's 1992 Annual Report on Form
10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (k) Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement among the Priming Lenders,
Operating Partners and the Agent dated as
of June 12, 1992, as amended by letters of
consent agreements dated February 1993,
and March 17, 1993, included as Exhibit
(10) (j) to the Partnership's 1992 Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and a letter of
consent agreement dated January 31, 1994,
included as Exhibit (10) (j) to the
Partnership's 1994 Annual Report on Form
10-K, are incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (l) Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement among Operating Partners, the
Holders named in Exhibit A thereto
(collectively, the "Existing Lenders") and
IBJ Schroeder Bank and Trust Company,
Servicer, dated June 12, 1992, as amended
by letters of consent agreements dated
February 1993, included as Exhibit (10)
(k) to the Partnership's 1992 Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and a letter of
consent agreement dated January 31, 1994,
included as Exhibit (10)(k) to the
Partnership's 1994 Annual Report on Form
10-K, are incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (m) Escrow Agreement among
Operating Partners, the Existing Lenders
and Chicago Title Insurance Company, as
escrow agent and as title insurer, dated
June 12, 1992 included as Exhibit (10) (l)
to the Partnership's 1992 Annual Report on
Form 10-K is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (n) Consulting Services
Agreement among the Partnerships, the
General Partner and Mr. S. Leonard Okin
dated December 1, 1994 (the "Consulting
Services Agreement") included as Exhibit
(10) (m) to the Partnership's 1994 Annual
Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein
by reference.
(10) (o) Fourth Consent Agreement
among Operating Partners, the Priming
Lenders, and the Existing Lenders dated
March 17, 1995 included as Exhibit (10)
(n) to the Partnership's 1994 Annual
Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein
by reference.
(10) (p) First Amendment to the
Consulting Services Agreement among the
Partnerships, the General Partner and Mr.
S. Leonard Okin dated December 1, 1995.
(10) (q) Second Amendment to the
Consulting Services Agreement among the
Partnerships, the General Partner and
Mr. S. Leonard Okin dated December 1, 1996.
(10) (r) Consulting Agreement
among Operating Partners and Siegel Rich,
Inc., dated March 11, 1997, formalizing
previously agreed upon terms and
conditions, included as Exhibit 10(p) to
the Partnership's 1997 Annual Report on
Form 10-K is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (s) Amended and Restated
Third Amendment to the Consulting Services
Agreement among the Partnerships, the
General Partner and Mr. S. Leonard Okin
dated December 1, 1997.
(21) Subsidiaries of the
Partnership: Until May 28, 1998, AMI
Operating Partners, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership.
(27) Financial Data Schedules
(b) Reports on Form 8-K None.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Registrant)
By: Prime-American Realty Corp. General Partner
Date: December 15, 1999 By: /s/ S. Leonard Okin
-------------------
S. Leonard Okin
Vice President & Director
Date: December 15, 1999 By: /s/ Robert A. Familant
----------------------
Robert A. Familant
Director
Date: December 15, 1999 By: /s/ Seymour G. Siegel
---------------------
Seymour G. Siegel
Director
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GENERAL PARTNER
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Name Date
- --------- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
By: /s/ S. Leonard Okin Director and Vice President December 15, 1999
S. Leonard Okin of the General Partner; Consultant
under the Consulting Services Agreement
By: /s/ Robert A. Familant Director of the General Partner December 15, 1999
Robert A. Familant
By: /s/ Seymour G. Siegel Director of the General Partner December 15, 1999
Seymour G. Siegel
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AND SUBSIDIARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGES
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Accountants 32
Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets (in liquidation) as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 33-34
Consolidated Statements of Operations (in liquidation) for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 35
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Equity (Deficit) (in liquidation) for the
years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 36
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in liquidation) for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 37
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 38-47
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
August 23, 1999
To the Partners of
Prime Motor Inns Limited Partnership
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related
consolidated statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash
flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Prime Motor Inns Limited Partnership and Subsidiary Limited Partnership (the
"Partnership") at December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
As discussed in Note 1, the Partnership sold its 99% limited partnership
interest in AMI Operating Partners, L.P. on May 28, 1998. The Partnership has
dissolved and is winding up its affairs and distributing the net proceeds from
the sale to the limited partners in accordance with a Plan of Liquidation. It
is anticipated that the Partnership will complete its liquidation and
terminate its existence during 1999.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AND SUBSIDIARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN LIQUIDATION)
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1998 1997
----------------- ------------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,176 $ 989
Cash and cash equivalents restricted for Field payment 513 -
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts in 1997 of $22 - 823
Inventories - 205
Prepaid expenses - 719
Other current assets 50 90
----------------- ------------------
Total current assets 1,739 2,826
----------------- ------------------
Property and equipment:
Land - 7,130
Buildings and leasehold improvements - 54,156
Furniture and equipment - 39,227
----------------- ------------------
- 100,513
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization - (54,950)
----------------- ------------------
Net, property and equipment - 45,563
----------------- ------------------
Cash and cash equivalents restricted for:
Acquisition of property and equipment - 2,165
Interest and taxes - 728
Other assets, net - 425
----------------- ------------------
Total assets $ 1,739 $ 51,707
================= ==================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997
----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable $ 84 $ 481
Accrued payroll - 614
Accrued payroll taxes - 149
Accrued vacation - 453
Accrued utilities - 287
Sales tax payable - 265
Other current liabilities 513 486
Income taxes payable 1,008 -
----------------- -----------------
Total current liabilities 1,605 2,735
Long-term debt - 63,544
Deferred interest - 1,974
Accrued shared appreciation - 4,500
Other liabilities - 205
----------------- -----------------
Total liabilities 1,605 72,958
----------------- -----------------
Partners' equity (deficit):
General partner 308 (784)
Limited partners (174) (20,467)
----------------- -----------------
Total partners' equity (deficit) 134 (21,251)
----------------- -----------------
Total liabilities and partners' equity (deficit) $ 1,739 $ 51,707
================= =================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AND SUBSIDIARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN LIQUIDATION)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT AMOUNTS)
1998 1997 1996
-------------- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Direct operating revenues:
Lodging $ 15,266 $ 40,852 $ 39,488
Food and beverage 3,680 9,138 9,735
Other income 310 362 361
-------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total revenues 19,256 50,352 49,584
-------------- ---------------- ---------------
Direct operating expenses:
Lodging 3,672 9,622 9,462
Food and beverage 3,103 7,827 8,112
Marketing 1,406 3,521 3,500
Utilities 1,046 2,896 3,053
Repairs and maintenance 1,300 3,600 3,680
Rent 560 1,304 1,316
Insurance 365 771 705
Property taxes 551 1,395 1,382
Other 3,424 8,644 8,369
Other general and administrative expenses 1,821 887 701
Depreciation and amortization 1,580 3,838 5,423
Interest expense 2,386 5,888 6,069
Shared appreciation expense 1,875 4,500 -
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total expenses 23,089 54,693 51,772
Gain on sale of Inn 805 1,011 -
Gain on sale of AMI Operating Partners, L.P. 35,621 - -
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Net income (loss) before income tax provision 32,593 (3,330) (2,188)
Income tax provision 1,008 - -
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Net income (loss) 31,585 (3,330) (2,188)
Net income (loss) allocable to general partner 1,092 (33) (22)
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Net income (loss) allocable to limited partners $ 30,493 $ (3,297) $ (2,166)
=============== ================ ===============
Number of limited partner units outstanding 4,000 4,000 4,000
=============== ================ ===============
Net income (loss) allocable to limited partners per unit $ 7.62 $ (.82) $ (.54)
=============== ================ ===============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AND SUBSIDIARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (IN LIQUIDATION)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
GENERAL LIMITED
PARTNER PARTNERS TOTAL
-------------- -------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1995 $ (729) $ (15,004) $ (15,733)
Net loss (22) (2,166) (2,188)
-------------- -------------- -----------------
Balance at December 31, 1996 (751) (17,170) (17,921)
Net loss (33) (3,297) (3,330)
-------------- -------------- -----------------
Balance at December 31, 1997 (784) (20,467) (21,251)
Net income 1,092 30,493 31,585
Liquidating distributions - (10,200) (10,200)
-------------- -------------- -----------------
Balance at December 31, 1998 $ 308 $ (174) $ 134
============== ============== =================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AND SUBSIDIARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN LIQUIDATION)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
-------------- ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 31,585 $ (3,330) $ (2,188)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property 1,410 3,596 5,201
Amortization of other assets 170 242 222
Amortization of debt discount 20 49 46
Long-term borrowings prepayment penalty - (43) -
Gain on sale of Inn (805) (1,011) -
Gain on sale of AMI Operating Partners, L.P. (35,621) - -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (105) (49) (113)
Inventories - 17 40
Prepaid expenses 144 233 (11)
Other current assets (4) 16 7
Other assets (517) (125) -
Trade accounts payable (7) (3) (84)
Accrued expenses 160 (81) (189)
Sales tax payable - (9) 32
Income taxes payable 1,008 - -
Other current liabilities 221 (286) 101
Deferred interest (380) (898) (813)
Accrued shared appreciation 1,875 4,500 -
Other liabilities 819 (11) 66
-------------- ----------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (27) 2,807 2,317
-------------- ----------- --------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net proceeds from sale of Inn 2,098 2,239 -
Net proceeds from sale of AMI Operating Partners, L.P. 5,700 - -
Cash acquired by Servico Acquisition Corp. in connection (2,184) - -
with sale of AMI Operating Partners, L.P.
Additions to property and equipment (87) (1,519) (1,880)
Increase in restricted cash (1,065) (1,176) (395)
-------------- ----------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 4,462 (456) (2,275)
-------------- ----------- --------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term borrowings (298) (2,196) -
Borrowings under revolving credit facility 1,800 1,600 1,600
Repayment of revolving credit facility (1,800) (1,600) (1,600)
Liquidating distributions (3,950) - -
-------------- ----------- --------------
Net cash used in financing activities (4,248) (2,196) -
-------------- ----------- --------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 187 155 42
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 989 834 792
-------------- ----------- --------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 1,176 $ 989 $ 834
============== =========== ==============
Supplementary cash flow data:
Interest paid $ 4,360 $ 6,737 $ 6,836
Liabilities of AMI Operating Partners, L.P. subject to which Servico $ 74,515,000 $ $ -
Acquisition Corp. acquired AMI Operating Partners, L.P. -
============== =========== ==============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AND SUBSIDIARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION, OPERATIONS, BANKRUPTCY AND SALE OF AMI OPERATING PARTNERS,
L.P.:
Prime Motor Inns Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") and its
99%-owned subsidiary, AMI Operating Partners, L.P. ("AMI"), were formed
in October 1986 under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership
Act. The Partnership and AMI are referred to collectively as the
"Partnership". Prime-American Realty Corp. (the "General Partner"), a
subsidiary of Prime Hospitality Corporation ("Prime"), formerly Prime
Motor Inns, Inc., is the general partner of and holds as its principal
asset a 1% partnership interest in the Partnership and until May 29,
1998, a 1% general partnership interest in AMI.
In December 1986, the Partnership consummated an initial public offering
(the "Offering") of 4,000,000 units of limited partnership interest (the
"Units") in the Partnership, and used the funds received to acquire the
99% limited partnership interest in AMI. AMI commenced operations in
December 1986 when it used the Offering proceeds and issued mortgage
notes (the "Mortgage Notes") in the principal amount of $61,470,000 to
purchase 16 full service motor hotels (the "Inns") from subsidiaries of
Prime.
Profits and losses from operations and cash distributions of the
Partnerships combined were generally allocated 1.99% to the General
Partner and 98.01% to the limited partners. Any profits and losses from
operations in excess of certain specified annual and cumulative returns
on investments in limited partner shares, as defined (generally 12.5%),
were allocated approximately 30% to the General Partner and 70% to the
limited partners.
Until November 30, 1990, the Inns were operated by AMI Management Corp.
("AMI Management"), another subsidiary of Prime, under the terms of a
lease between AMI Management and AMI (the "Lease"), guaranteed by Prime
(the "Guaranty"). The Lease was a net lease that granted AMI Management
the right to use the Inns until December 31, 1991.
On September 18, 1990, Prime announced that it and certain of its
subsidiaries, including AMI Management but not the General Partner, had
filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
Florida. AMI Management defaulted on the payment of base rent due
November 1, 1990 under the Lease. On November 7, 1990, the Partnership
gave notice of default to, and demanded payment from, AMI Management and
Prime. AMI Management and Prime also filed a motion to reject the Lease
and Guaranty and, by order of the bankruptcy court dated December 7,
1990, the bankruptcy court approved such rejection and the Lease and
Guaranty were terminated, effective as of November 30, 1990 (see Note
3a).
AMI was in default under its mortgage loan agreement as of and prior to
December 31, 1990 as a result of, among other things, the bankruptcy
filing by Prime and AMI Management. On March 28, 1991, the Partnerships
received a notice of acceleration and demand for payment of the entire
outstanding balance of the Mortgage Notes along with certain conditions
under which the lenders would pursue discussions with respect to
restructuring the Mortgage Notes.
On February 28, 1992, AMI filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York a voluntary petition for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code,
seeking confirmation by the bankruptcy court of a prepackaged plan of
reorganization (the "Plan"). On May 28, 1992, the New York Bankruptcy
Court confirmed the Plan, which became effective as of June 12, 1992 (the
"Effective Date"). Upon confirmation of the Plan, the New York Bankruptcy
Court approved the Restated Loan Agreement (the "Restated Loan
Agreement") which, among other things, extended the maturity date of the
Mortgage Notes to December 31, 1999 (see Note 5 for a further discussion
of this matter).
At December 31, 1997, AMI owned and operated 15 Inns as part of the
"Holiday Inn" system. Franchises for several of the Inns were due to
expire in 1998 and would not have been renewed due to the General
Partner's inability to obtain the necessary financing for Product
Improvement Programs required in connection with renewal of the
franchises. The loss of the franchises would have resulted in a default
under the provisions of AMI's Priming Loan (see Note 5) and Mortgage and
it was believed the lenders would not have waived such default.
The Partnership entered into a definitive agreement dated as of November
7, 1997, as amended as of March 12, 1998, pursuant to which the
Partnership's 99% limited partnership interest in AMI (the "Interest")
was to be sold for $12,000,000 in cash to Servico Acquisition Corp.
("SAC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Servico, Inc. ("Servico"). The
General Partner and its parent entered into an agreement with Servico
pursuant to which Servico was to acquire the General Partner's 1% general
partnership interest in AMI in exchange for a five year warrant to
acquire 100,000 shares of Servico common stock at a price of $18 per
share.
In 1998, Davenport Management Company ("DMC") conducted a proxy
solicitation to remove Prime-American Realty Corp. as General Partner and
elect itself as the replacement General Partner. DMC proposed a plan to
dispose of certain Inns, to refinance AMI indebtedness, to renegotiate
the "Holiday Inn" franchises, and to acquire additional properties. In
resolution of the dispute with DMC and based on the understanding that
Martin W. Field had paid, or would pay or reimburse, expenses and
expenditures in connection with the DMC proxy solicitation, the
Partnership agreed to make a payment of $500,000 to Mr. Field (the "Field
Payment").
On May 28, 1998, the holders of the units of limited partnership interest
("Units") in the Partnership voted to approve the Partnership's sale of
the Interest to SAC and the dissolution and liquidation of the
Partnership. On May 28, 1998, the Partnership completed the sale of the
Interest to SAC and dissolved.
Because Servico owned approximately 2,450,000 of the 4,000,000 Units
outstanding at the time of the completion of the sale of the Interest,
Servico and the Partnership agreed that SAC would transfer to the
Partnership $5,700,000 in cash of the $12,000,000 purchase price, (with
the result that Servico in effect retained a liquidating distribution of
$2.57 per Unit owned by Servico) and that Servico would pay to the
Partnership any amount necessary to make distributions to all holders of
Units proportionate. Cash distributions to holders of Units other than
Servico aggregated approximately $3,950,000 ($2.55 per Unit) through
December 31, 1998. In addition, the Partnership incurred approximately
$623,000 in expenses resulting from liquidating activities in 1998, which
are classified as other general and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statement of operations.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the
financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The following is a summary of certain significant accounting policies
used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
a. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION: The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Partnership, and through May 28, 1998,
its 99%-owned subsidiary limited partnership, AMI. AMI operated on
the basis of a year ending on the Friday which was most proximate to
December 31 of any given year. All material intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
b. CASH EQUIVALENTS: Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with
a maturity of three months or less when acquired.
c. INVENTORIES: Inventories were stated at the lower of cost or market,
with cost determined on the first-in, first-out method. At December
31, 1998, there were no inventories. At December 31, 1997,
inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
Food $130
Beverage 64
Linen 11
--------------
$205
==============
d. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: Property and equipment were stated at the
lower of cost and fair market value. The net carrying value of
property and equipment as of December 31, 1991 was reduced to
estimated fair market value, through a charge to expenses in the
amount of $46,354,000. Expenditures for improvements and major
renewals were capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs,
which did not extend the useful life of the asset, were expensed as
incurred. For financial statement purposes, provision was made for
depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method over the
lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from 15
to 40 years for buildings and leasehold improvements and 3 to 10
years for furniture and equipment, and the terms of the related
leases. For federal income tax purposes, accelerated methods were
used in calculating depreciation.
e. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG LIVED ASSETS: The Partnership reviewed for
impairment and recoverability of property and equipment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying amount
of an asset might not be recoverable. If an evaluation was required,
the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the
asset were compared to the asset's carrying amount to determine if a
write-down to fair market value was required. Properties held for
sale were stated at the lower of cost and fair value less cost to
sell. No write-downs were recorded by the Company under the
provisions of SFAS 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets".
f. OTHER ASSETS: Franchise fees, deferred lease costs, and deferred debt
acquisition costs were amortized on a straight-line basis over the
estimated lives of the assets or the specific term of the related
agreement, lease or mortgage loan.
g. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT: Net income (loss) per Unit is calculated
based on the net income (loss) allocable to limited partners divided
by the 4,000,000 Units outstanding.
h. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: It was not practicable to
estimate the fair value of borrowings under the Partnerships' long
term debt due to the lack of quoted market prices for similar debt
issues and the lack of current rates which would have been offered to
the Partnerships for debt with similar terms.
3. OPERATIONS OF THE INNS:
a. LEASE AND GUARANTY: Prior to the rejection and termination of the
Lease and Guaranty effective as of November 30, 1990, the Lease
granted AMI Management the right to use the Inns for the operation of
hotels and related purposes.
AMI Management defaulted on the payment of $1,311,000 of base rent
due on November 1, 1990. Pursuant to the joint motion approved by
order of the bankruptcy court on January 8, 1991, the Partnerships,
AMI Management and Prime entered into an agreement providing for the
assumption by AMI of the operations of the Inns (the "Agreement").
The Partnership also effectively assumed control over certain
accounts receivable, supplies, equipment and other assets and
responsibility for certain accounts payable and other liabilities
arising from the operations of the Inns by AMI Management during the
term of the lease. Disputes between the parties existed at December
31, 1991 as to, among other things, the value of certain assets and
liabilities under the Agreement. AMI entered into an agreement in
1992 (the "Omnibus Agreement") under which, among other things, AMI
assigned to the holders of the Mortgage Notes its claims against
Prime and AMI Management and agreed that amounts recovered on such
claims would be allocated among financial claims (the proceeds of
which would be applied to the repayment of the Mortgage Notes) and
operating claims (the proceeds of which would be available to finance
capital improvements to the Inns).
In July 1992, the servicing agent for the holders of the Mortgage
Notes, Prime and AMI Management reached a settlement (the
"Settlement") of claims which was approved by the Florida Bankruptcy
Court. Under the Settlement, various claims of the holders of the
Mortgage Notes against Prime and AMI Management were allowed; AMI was
not required to make any payments to or for the benefit of any other
party; and Prime, AMI Management and AMI exchanged mutual releases.
Since 1992, AMI and the mortgage lenders received total proceeds as a
result of the Settlement of approximately $8,874,000, of which
$8,827,000 was utilized to reduce the principal amount of the
Mortgage Notes and $47,000 was used to fund capital improvements as
required by the Omnibus Agreement.
b. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS: The Inns were operated as part of the "Holiday
Inn" system which is administrated by Holiday Hospitality
Corporation, formerly Holiday Inns Inc., and its affiliates
(collectively "HHC").
During 1997, eleven of the Inns' franchise agreements expired and
were subsequently extended through May 28, 1998. For five of the
Inns, HHC advised the Partnership that they did not intend to renew
such franchises. However, HHC agreed that if, by March 10, 1998, it
received franchise license applications from a "viable" applicant for
the remaining six Inns and were paid application fees of $517,000, it
would extend the franchises for all eleven Inns for 60 days.
Applications were filed by Servico, and the fees were paid by the
Partnership, on or prior to March 10, 1998.
c. W&H MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT: Winegardner & Hammons, Inc. ("W&H") managed
the operations of the Inns through May 28, 1998 pursuant to its
management agreement with AMI which provided for an annual management
fee of 2.25% of the gross revenues of the Inns and certain incentive
management fees. W&H was also reimbursed for miscellaneous
out-of-pocket expenses allocated to the Inns, including expenses
incurred in providing certain administrative services for the
Partnership, royalties and marketing, advertising, public relations,
and reservation services, subject to certain limitations. At December
31, 1997, the Partnership had approximately $57,000 in receivables
from an entity controlled by W&H which managed certain of the Inns'
lounges.
D. PROPERTIES SOLD: In July 1997, the Partnership sold an Inn located in
Glen Burnie, Maryland for $2,400,000 in cash, which resulted in a
gain of approximately $1,011,000. Direct revenues of approximately
$945,000, and $1,724,000, and direct expenses of $813,000, and
$1,364,000, related to this Inn were included in the consolidated
statement of operations of the years ended December 31, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
On May 1, 1998, the Partnership sold an Inn located in Pikesville,
Maryland for $2,400,000 in cash, which resulted in a gain of
approximately $805,000. Direct revenues of approximately $486,000,
$1,794,000 and $1,715,000, and direct expenses of $461,000,
$1,511,000 and $1,492,000, related to this Inn were included in the
consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Effective May 28, 1998, the Partnership sold its Interest in AMI (see
Note 1) for $12,000,000 in cash (which amounted to the disposition of
the Partnership's interest in the remaining 14 Inns), which resulted
in a gain of approximately $35,621,000.
4. OTHER ASSETS:
The components of other assets at December 31, 1997 were as follows (in
thousands):
Deferred lease costs $ 21
Debt acquisition costs 2,839
Franchise fees 945
Other 4
--------------
3,809
Less accumulated amortization 3,384
--------------
$ 425
==============
In June 1997, the Partnership paid $125,000 to HHC to extend the Holiday
Inn franchises to July 31, 1997. Those franchises were subsequently
extended to May 28, 1998 (see Note 3b).
Amortization of debt acquisition costs charged to expense was $67,000,
$163,000, and $161,000 in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Amortization
of franchise fees charged to expense was $103,000, $79,000, and $61,000
in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
5. DEBT:
Long-term debt at December 31, 1997 consisted of (in thousands):
Mortgage notes, net of unamortized discount of $109 $54,240
Priming loan, interest at 11% 9,304
-----------------
$63,544
=================
In confirming the bankruptcy Plan of Reorganization on May 28, 1992, the
New York Bankruptcy Court approved a Restated Loan Agreement which called
for the following provisions: $3,467,127 of accrued and unpaid interest
at December 31, 1991 (the "Deferred Amount") was added to the principal
amount of the Mortgage Notes, but bore interest only from and after
January 1, 1995; the Mortgage Notes (not including the Deferred Amount)
bore interest payable at a rate of 8% per annum in 1994; the principal
amount of the Mortgage Notes (including the Deferred Amount) bore
interest at the rate of 10% per annum from January 1, 1995 until
maturity; and maturity of the Mortgage Notes (including the Deferred
Amount) was extended to December 31, 1999. In addition, the Restated Loan
Agreement provided for the deeds to the Inns and assignments of other
assets of AMI to be held in escrow until maturity of the Mortgage Notes.
Under the terms of the Restated Loan Agreement, the Mortgage Notes were
repayable at any time without penalty.
The Restated Loan Agreement was accounted for as a modification of terms
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15,
"Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings."
Accordingly, the carrying value of the Mortgage Notes and Deferred Amount
was not adjusted to reflect the terms of the Restated Loan Agreement. The
effect of the changes in the terms of the Mortgage Notes was recognized
prospectively over the life of the Mortgage Notes through an adjustment
of the effective interest rate on the Mortgage Notes and Deferred Amount
to approximately 8.5% per annum (the "Effective Rate"). The amount by
which interest payable at the Effective Rate exceeded the amount of
interest paid at the stated rate was accrued and was included in deferred
interest payable at December 31, 1997.
As part of the Plan, certain members of the lending group also agreed to
provide AMI post-petition financing (the "Priming Loan"). Borrowings
under the Priming Loan were used to finance capital improvements or to
fund operating cash requirements. The portion used for capital
improvements (defined as the Tranche A Loan), which could have been up to
the full amount of the $14,000,000 available, was due on December 31,
1999 and provided for a prepayment premium of 2%. The portion used for
operating cash requirements (defined as the Tranche B Loan), which could
not exceed the lesser of $2,500,000 and the amount remaining after
borrowings for capital improvements. Borrowings under the Tranche B Loan
were pursuant to a revolving facility, such that amounts repaid could
only be reborrowed up to the limits of availability. These revolving
credit borrowings were subject to the mandatory repayment provisions
described below. There were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving
facility at December 31, 1997.
The Priming Loan agreement placed certain restrictions on the use of
AMI's cash flow and sales proceeds. Operating cash flow could only be
used in accordance with the Priming Loan agreement, which called for,
among other things, monthly deposits into an escrow account held by or on
behalf of the lenders for the payment of a furniture, fixtures and
equipment reserve of 5% of gross revenues. The cash on hand from the
operation of the Inns less the current month projected cash deficiency,
if any, less a working capital reserve not to exceed $2,000,000, could be
utilized first to repay any outstanding borrowings under the Tranche B
Loan and then be paid into an escrow account held on behalf of the
lenders for the payment of taxes and insurance.
During 1997, the Partnership sold an Inn and received net proceeds of
approximately $2,239,000 (See Note 3d). As required by the Priming Loan,
the proceeds were used to repay approximately $2,196,000 of outstanding
borrowings under the Tranche A Loan and to pay a prepayment premium of
approximately $43,000. As of December 31, 1997, the outstanding balance
under the Priming loan was $9,304,000, and the entire amount represented
borrowings under the Tranche A Loan.
During 1998, the Partnership sold an Inn and received net proceeds of
approximately $2,098,000 (See Note 3d). As required by the Priming Loan,
the proceeds were used to repay approximately $1,800,000 of outstanding
borrowings under the Tranche B Loan and approximately $298,000 under the
Tranche A Loan.
On May 28, 1998, SAC acquired the Interest, and Servico acquired the
general partnership interest, in AMI subject to all indebtedness of AMI
then outstanding, including the Mortgage and the Priming Loan. From and
after May 28, 1998, the Partnership did not have liability under or with
respect to the Mortgage, the Priming Loan, or other indebtedness or
obligations of AMI.
6. SHARED APPRECIATION:
The Restated Loan Agreement and the W&H Management Agreement provided for
a shared appreciation feature that called for AMI to pay additional
interest and an additional incentive management fee to the lenders and
W&H, respectively, based on (i) in the case of any Inn sold prior to the
maturity date of the Mortgage Notes, the amount (if any) by which the net
sale price of the Inn exceeded the amount of the Mortgage Notes allocated
to it, and (ii) in the case of the Inns still owned by AMI at the
maturity date of the Mortgage Notes (December 31, 1999 or upon
acceleration), the amount (if any) by which the sale price or appraised
value of such Inns exceeded the then outstanding principal amount of the
Mortgage Notes, with such computations also being net of any obligations
under the Priming Loan. However, no amount was payable as additional
interest or incentive management fees until all obligations under the
Priming Loan were paid. For each reporting period, the Partnership
estimated the fair value of the Inns (based on the forecast sale proceeds
of Inns held for sale at the close of the reporting period and the
forecast fair value at December 31, 1999 of the other Inns) to determine
if an accrual was needed for future payments to the Lenders and W&H under
the shared appreciation feature. The Partnership did not provide for
additional interest or incentive management fees in 1996. For 1998 and
1997, the Partnership recorded $1,875,000 and $4,500,000, respectively,
as additional interest and incentive management fees under the Restated
Loan Agreement and the W&H Management Agreement. The additional interest
and incentive management fees for 1998 were recorded in the first
quarter, while the Partnership still owned a 99% interest in the Inns. On
May 28, 1998, SAC acquired the Interest, and Servico acquired the general
partnership interest, in AMI subject to all indebtedness and obligations
of AMI then outstanding, including the Mortgage and the management
agreement with W&H. From and after May 28, 1998, the Partnership did not
have liability for or with respect to additional interest or incentive
management fees.
7. COMMITMENTS:
Four of the Inns were held pursuant to land leases and three of the Inns
were held pursuant to land and building leases, which were accounted for
as operating leases. The leases had terms expiring at various dates from
2000 through 2024 and options to renew the leases for terms varying from
ten to forty years. Five of the leases were subject to an escalating rent
provision based upon inflation indexes, which adjusted the lease payment
every five to ten years depending on the respective lease. One of the
leases was a land lease with a subsidiary of Prime that was due to expire
in 2000 (with an option to extend 40 years) and required annual rentals
of $24,000. Rent expense under these leases totaled $560,000, $1,273,000
and $1,258,000 in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.
8. INCOME TAXES:
No federal or state income taxes were reflected in the financial
statements of the Partnership for periods prior to 1998. Based upon an
opinion of counsel of the Partnership obtained in 1986, which is not
binding upon the Internal Revenue Service, the Partnerships were not
taxable entities at their inception. The partners were required to report
their allocable shares of the profits and losses of the Partnership in
their respective income tax returns.
The Revenue Act of 1987 (the "1987 Act") added several provisions to the
Internal Revenue Code which affected publicly traded partnerships such as
the Partnership. Under these rules, a publicly traded partnership is
taxed as a corporation unless 90% or more of its income constitutes
"qualifying income," such as real property rents, dividends and interest.
The 1987 Act also provided certain transitional rules, however, which
generally exempted publicly traded partnerships in existence on December
17, 1987 from application of the new rules until after 1997, subject to
various limitations.
Publicly traded partnerships which add a substantial new line of business
are not eligible for relief under these transitional rules and it is
possible that the Internal Revenue Service could contend that the
Partnership should be taxed as a corporation after November 30, 1990, the
date of termination of the Lease. Also, it should be noted that with
respect to the partners, the 1987 Act also contained rules under which
the income of the Partnership will be treated, effectively, as "portfolio
income" for tax purposes and will not be eligible to offset losses form
other passive activities. Similarly, any losses of the Partnership will
not be eligible to offset any income from other sources.
Effective January 1, 1998, the Partnership elected to be treated as an
"electing partnership". As an electing partnership, the Partnership is
still treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, but is
subject to a 3.5% federal tax on all gross income of the Partnership from
the active conduct of a trade or business. Such gross income includes the
net gain on the sale of AMI and the Pikesville, Maryland Inn.
Differences between the federal statutory tax rate and the effective tax
rate are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT
(000'S) PERCENT
-------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Gross income tax at statutory rate $1,949 3.5%
Reduction in tax as a result of differences between book
and tax gains on the sale of AMI and the Pikesville, Maryland Inn (941) (1.7%)
-------------- -----------
$1,008 1.8%
============== ===========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT INDEX
Page
<S> <C>
(2) (b) Agreed order of the Florida Bankruptcy Court
approving rejection of the Lease, the Guarantee and a related agreement
included as Exhibit (2) (b) to the Partnership's 1990 Annual Report on Form
10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
(2) (c) Acquisition Agreement among Servico, the
Partnership, the General Partner and SAC, dated as of November 7, 1997
included as Exhibit 1 to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 21, 1997 is incorporated herein by reference.
(2) (d) First Amendment to Acquisition Agreement among
Servico, the Partnership, the General Partner and SAC, dated as of March 12,
1998, included as Appendix A to the Partnership's Proxy Statement dated May 5,
1998 is incorporated herein by reference.
(2) (e) Plan and Agreement of Dissolution and Liquidation
dated as of May 28, 1998 of the Partnership included as Appendix B to the
Partnership's Proxy Statement dated may 5, 1998 and incorporated herein by
reference.
(3) (a) Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of the Partnership included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-9595) (The "Registration
Statement") is incorporated herein by reference.
(3) (b) Certificate of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership included as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
(3) (c) Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Operating Partners, included as Exhibit 3.3 to the Registration
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
(3) (d) Certificate of Limited Partnership of Operating
Partners included as Exhibit 3.6 to the Registration Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
(4) (a) Form of Deposit Agreement included as Exhibit 10.8
to the Registration Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (a) Form of Lease included as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registration Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (b) Form of Management Agreement included as Exhibit
10.2 to the Registration Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
<PAGE>
(10) (c) Form of Purchase and Sale Agreement included as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (d) Form of Note Purchase and Loan Agreement included
as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (e) Form of Service Contract included as Exhibit 10.5
to the Registration Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (f) Form of Undertaking included as Exhibit 10.6 to the
Registration Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (g) Form of Guaranty included as Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registration Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (h) Management Agreement among Operating Partners,
Sixteen Hotels, Inc., and W&H, dated January 4, 1990, included as Exhibit (10)
(h) to the Partnership's 1990 Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10) (i) Sixth Amendment to the Replacement Management
Agreement among Operating Partners Sixteen Hotels, Inc. and W&H, as Manager,
to be effective January 4, 1997 included as Exhibit 10( ) to the Partnership's
1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (j) Loan Agreement among Massachusetts Mutual Life
Insurance Company, Century Life of America and Jackson National Life Insurance
Company (collectively, the "Priming Lenders"), as lenders, Operating Partners,
as borrower and Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., Agent (the "Agent") dated as of
February 28, 1992 included as Exhibit (10) (i) to the Partnership's 1992
Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (k) Amended and Restated Loan Agreement among the
Priming Lenders, Operating Partners and the Agent dated as of June 12, 1992,
as amended by letters of consent agreements dated February 1993, and March 17,
1993, included as Exhibit (10) (j) to the Partnership's 1992 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, and a letter of consent agreement dated January 31, 1994, included
as Exhibit (10) (j) to the Partnership's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, are
incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (l) Amended and Restated Loan Agreement among Operating
Partners, the Holders named in Exhibit A thereto (collectively, the "Existing
Lenders") and IBJ Schroeder Bank and Trust Company, Servicer, dated June 12,
1992, as amended by letters of consent agreements dated February 1993,
included as Exhibit (10) (k) to the Partnership's 1992 Annual Report on Form
10-K, and a letter of consent agreement dated January 31, 1994, included as
Exhibit (10)(k) to the Partnership's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, are
incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (m) Escrow Agreement among Operating Partners, the
Existing Lenders and Chicago Title Insurance Company, as escrow agent and as
title insurer, dated June 12, 1992 included as Exhibit (10) (l) to the
Partnership's 1992 Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (n) Consulting Services Agreement among the
Partnerships, the General Partner and Mr. S. Leonard Okin dated December 1,
1994 (the "Consulting Services Agreement") included as Exhibit (10) (m) to the
Partnership's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10) (o) Fourth Consent Agreement among Operating Partners,
the Priming Lenders, and the Existing Lenders dated March 17, 1995 included as
Exhibit (10) (n) to the Partnership's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K is
incorporated herein by reference.
(10) (p) First Amendment to the Consulting Services
Agreement among the Partnerships, the General Partner and Mr. S. Leonard Okin
dated December 1, 1995.
51
(10) (q) Second Amendment to the Consulting Services
Agreement among the Partnerships, the General Partner and Mr. S. Leonard Okin
dated December 1, 1996.
53
(10) (r) Consulting Agreement among Operating Partners and
Siegel Rich, Inc., dated March 11, 1997, formalizing previously agreed upon
terms and conditions, included as Exhibit 10(p) to the Partnership's 1997
Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
55
(10) (s) Amended and Restated Third Amendment to the
Consulting Services Agreement among the Partnerships, the General Partner and
Mr. S. Leonard Okin dated December 1, 1997.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10(p)
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement (the "First
Amendment") is made and entered into to be effective as of the 1st day of
December, 1995, by and between the Companies and S. Leonard Okin, the
Consultant.
Preliminary Statements
1. The Consultant and the Companies have previously entered into a
certain Consulting Services Agreement dated to be effective as of December 1,
1994 (the "Agreement").
2. All defined terms, noted in the First Amendment by being
capitalized, shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement unless
otherwise specifically defined in this First Amendment.
3. The parties desire to amend the provisions of the Agreement in
accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth below.
4. In consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants set
forth below the parties, intending to be legally bound, do hereby agree as
follows:
1. The second line of Paragraph 1(d) defining the term "Base
Compensation" shall be modified by replacing the word "$5,000" with the word
"$5,250".
2. The third line of Paragraph 1(n) defining the term "Initial Term"
shall be modified by replacing the words "December 31, 1995" with the words
"December 31, 1996".
3. Except as modified above, all other provisions set forth in the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto executed this First
Amendment to be effective as of the day and year set forth above.
WITNESS: PRIME-AMERICAN REALTY CORPORATION
____________________________ By: __________________________________
Its: Director
WITNESS: PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: Prime American Realty Corporation,
its general partner
____________________________ By: _____________________________
Its: Director
AMI OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P.
By: Prime American Realty Corporation,
its general partner
____________________________ By: _____________________________
Its: Director
____________________________ _____________________________
S. Leonard Okin
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10(q)
SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Second Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement (the "Second
Amendment") is made and entered into to be effective as of the 1st day of
December, 1996, by and between the Companies and S. Leonard Okin, the
Consultant.
Preliminary Statements
1. The Consultant and the Companies have previously entered into a
certain Consulting Services Agreement dated to be effective as of December 1,
1994 (the "Original Agreement").
2. The Consultant and the Companies have also previously entered
into a First Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement dated to be effective
as of December 1, 1995 (the "First Amendment").
3. For purposes hereof the Original Agreement and the First
Amendment are collectively referred to as the "Agreement".
4. All defined terms, noted in the Second Amendment by being
capitalized, shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Original
Agreement or First Amendment unless otherwise specifically defined in this
Second Amendment.
5. The parties desire to amend the provisions of the Agreement in
accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Preliminary
Statements, which shall be and are incorporated as a part of this Second
Amendment as is fully stated below, the performance by the parties of their
respective obligations under the Agreement, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties, intending to be legally bound, do now hereby agree as follows:
1. The second line of Paragraph 1(d) of the Original Agreement, is
subsequently modified by the provisions of Paragraph 1 of the First Amendment
(which provisions define the term "Base Compensation") shall be modified by
replacing the word "$5,250" with the word "$5,565". Thus, for purposes hereof
the Base Compensation shall now be in the amount of $5,565.
2. The third line of Paragraph 1(n) of the Original Agreement, as
modified by the provisions of Paragraph 2 of the First Amendment (which
provisions defined the term "Initial Term") shall again be modified so that
the words "December 31, 1996" shall be replaced in their entirety with the
words "December 31, 1997". Thus, the Initial Term shall be for the period
ending December 31, 1997.
3. Except as modified above, all other provisions set forth in the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto executed this Second
Amendment to be effective as of the day and year set forth above.
WITNESS: PRIME-AMERICAN REALTY CORPORATION
____________________________ By: __________________________________
Its: Director
WITNESS: PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: Prime American Realty Corporation,
its general partner
____________________________ By: _____________________________
Its: Director
AMI OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P.
By: Prime American Realty Corporation,
its general partner
____________________________ By: _____________________________
Its: Director
____________________________ _____________________________
S. Leonard Okin
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10(s)
AMENDED AND RESTATED
THIRD AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Amended and Restated Third Amendment to Consulting Services
Agreement (the "Third Amendment") is made and entered into to be effective as
of the 1st day of January, 1998, by and between the Companies and S. Leonard
Okin, the Consultant.
Preliminary Statements
1. The Consultant and the Companies have previously entered into a
certain Consulting Services Agreement dated to be effective as of December 1,
1994 (the "Original Agreement").
2. The Consultant and the Companies have previously entered into a
First Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement dated to be effective as of
December 1, 1995 (the "First Amendment").
3. The Consultant and the Companies have also previously entered
into a Second Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement dated to be effective
as of December 1, 1996 (the "Second Amendment").
4. For purposes hereof the Original Agreement, the First Amendment
and the Second Amendment are collectively referred to as the "Agreement".
5. All defined terms, noted in this Restated Third Amendment by
being capitalized, shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Original
Agreement, First Amendment or Second Agreement unless otherwise specifically
defined in this Restated Third Amendment.
6. The parties desire to amend the provisions of the Agreement in
accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth below.
7. The parties desire that this Restated Third Agreement replace, in
its entirety, the previously executed Third Amendment to Consulting Services
Agreement so that the following execution of this Restated Third Amendment,
the previously executed Third Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement shall
become immediately null and void and of no further force and effect.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Preliminary
Statements, which shall be and are incorporated as a part of this Restated
Third Amendment as is fully stated below, the performance by the parties of
their respective obligations under the Agreement, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties, intending to be legally bound, do now hereby agree as follows:
1. The second line of Paragraph 1(d) of the Original Agreement, as
subsequently modified by the provisions of Paragraph 1 of the Second Amendment
(which provisions define the term "Base Compensation") shall again be modified
by replacing the word "$5,656" with the word "$5,843". Thus, for purposes
hereof the Base Compensation shall now be in the amount of $5,843.
2. The third line of Paragraph 1(n) of the Original Agreement, as
modified by the provisions of Paragraph 2 of the Second Amendment (which
provisions defined the term "Initial Term") shall again be modified so that
the words "December 31, 1997" shall be replaced in their entirety with the
words "December 31, 1998". Thus, the Initial Term shall be for the period
ending December 31, 1998.
3. At Paragraph 1(y), the defined term "Termination Payment" shall
be rewritten and redefined in its entirety to read as follows:
"(y) The term "Termination Payment" shall mean an amount equal to
six (6) times the amount of the Base Compensation payable to Consultant as of
the Date of Termination."
4. Except as modified above, all other provisions set forth in the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto executed this Third
Amendment to be effective as of the day and year set forth above.
WITNESS: PRIME-AMERICAN REALTY CORPORATION
____________________________ By: __________________________________
Its: Director
WITNESS: PRIME MOTOR INNS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: Prime American Realty Corporation,
its general partner
____________________________ By: _____________________________
Its: Director
AMI OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P.
By: Prime American Realty Corporation,
its general partner
____________________________ By: _____________________________
Its: Director
____________________________ _____________________________
S. Leonard Okin
