BIOJECT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
424B3, 2000-03-20
SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS
Previous: MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE INVESTORS INC, 424B5, 2000-03-20
Next: BIOJECT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC, S-3/A, 2000-03-20




                                                Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
                                                File Number 333-94907


                                   PROSPECTUS


                                 164,619 Shares
                        BIOJECT MEDICAL TECHNOLGIES INC.
                                  Common Stock


     Shares  of common  stock of  Bioject  Medical  Technolgies  Inc.  are being
offered by this  Prospectus.  The  shares  will be sold from time to time by the
selling  stockholders  named in this Prospectus.  We will not receive any of the
proceeds from the sale of the shares.

     Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq  SmallCap  Market under the symbol
"BJCT." On March 16,  2000,  the last sale price of our common stock as reported
on the Nasdaq National Market was $13.0625 per share.

                            ------------------------

     Investment in the common stock  involves a high degree of risk. See section
titled  "Risk  Factors"  beginning on page 7 to read about  certain  factors you
should consider before buying shares of common stock.

                            ------------------------

     Neither the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  nor any state  securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this
Prospectus  is truthful or  complete.  Any  representation  to the contrary is a
criminal offense.


The date of this Prospectus is March 17, 2000.


<PAGE>




                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

About This Prospectus.................................................2
Where You Can Find More Information...................................3
About Bioject Medical Technologies Inc. ..............................4
Forward-Looking Statements............................................7
Risk Factors..........................................................7
Use of Proceeds......................................................13
Selling Shareholders.................................................13
Plan of Distribution.................................................14
Legal Matters........................................................14
Experts..............................................................14



                              ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

     This Prospectus is part of a registration  statement that we filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the  "SEC").  The  Prospectus  relates to
164,619 shares (the "Shares") of our common stock which the selling stockholders
named in this  Prospectus  (the  "Selling  Stockholders")  may sell from time to
time. We will not receive any of the proceeds  from these sales.  We have agreed
to pay the expenses  incurred in  registering  the Shares,  including  legal and
accounting fees.

     The Shares have not been registered  under the securities laws of any state
or other  jurisdiction  as of the date of this  Prospectus.  Brokers  or dealers
should  confirm the existence of an exemption  from  registration  or effectuate
such registration in connection with any offer and sale of the Shares.

     This  Prospectus  describes  certain risk factors that you should  consider
before purchasing the Shares. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 3. You should
read this Prospectus  together with the additional  information  described under
the heading "Where You Can Find More Information."





                                       2
<PAGE>


                       WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

         Federal  securities  law requires us to file  information  with the SEC
concerning our business and  operations.  We file annual,  quarterly and special
reports,  proxy statements and other  information with the SEC. You can read and
copy these documents at the public reference  facility  maintained by the SEC at
Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Room 1024, Washington,  DC 20549. You can
also copy and inspect such reports,  proxy  statements and other  information at
the following regional offices of the SEC:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   New York Regional Office                 Chicago Regional  Office
   Seven World Trade Center                 Citicorp Center
          Suite 1300                        500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400
      New York, NY 10048                    Chicago, Illinois  60661
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public
reference  rooms.  Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC's
web  site at  http://www.sec.gov.  You  can  also  inspect  our  reports,  proxy
statements and other information at the offices of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

     The SEC allows us to  "incorporate  by reference"  the  information we file
with it,  which  means  that we can  disclose  important  information  to you by
referring  you to  those  documents.  The  information  that we  incorporate  by
reference is considered  to be part of this  Prospectus,  and later  information
that  we  file  with  the SEC  will  automatically  update  and  supersede  this
information.  We  incorporate  by reference the  documents  listed below and any
future filings made with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"):

1.   Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1999.
2.   Our  Quarterly  Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods  ended June 30,  1999,
     September  30, 1999 (and as amended on January 14, 2000 and March 15, 2000)
     and December 31, 1999 (as amended on March 15, 2000 and March 17, 2000).
3.   The  Definitive  Proxy  Statement for the Annual  Meeting of the Company on
     Schedule 14A, dated August 12, 1999.
4.   Our Current  Reports on Form 8-K filed on April 20, 1999, June 29, 1999,
     July 13, 1999 and March 3, 2000.
5.   The description of our Common Stock contained in our registration statement
     under  Section 12 of the Exchange  Act,  dated  January 29,  1987,  and any
     amendment  or  report   updating  such   description,   including   without
     limitation,  Amendment No. 1 thereto dated October 5, 1987, Amendment No. 2
     thereto dated October 26, 1987,  Amendment No. 3 thereto dated December 23,
     1987,  Amendment  No. 4 thereto  dated January 27, 1988 and Amendment No. 5
     thereto  dated  February  9, 1988,  our  Current  Reports on Form 8-K dated
     December 17, 1992, November 29, 1995 and December 14, 1995.

     This  Prospectus is part of a registration  statement we filed with the SEC
(Registration  No.  333-94907).  You may request a free copy of any of the above
filings by writing or calling:

                                  Chris Farrell
                                    Secretary
                             7620 SW Bridgeport Road
                             Portland, Oregon 97224
                                 (503) 639-7221

     You  should  rely only on the  information  incorporated  by  reference  or
provided in this  Prospectus or any supplement to this  Prospectus.  We have not
authorized  anyone else to provide you with different  information.  The Selling
Stockholders  should  not make an offer of these  Shares in any state  where the
offer is not  permitted.  You  should not assume  that the  information  in this
Prospectus or any supplement to this Prospectus is accurate as of any date other
than the date on the cover page of this Prospectus or any supplement.



                                       3
<PAGE>

                     ABOUT BIOJECT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.

We develop,  manufacture and market jet injection  systems for needle-free  drug
delivery. We sell our products directly to healthcare providers. We also license
our technology to leading  pharmaceutical and biotechnology  companies for whose
products our technology  provides  increased medical efficacy or enhanced market
acceptance.

Our needle-free operations are conducted by Bioject Inc., an Oregon corporation,
which is our wholly owned subsidiary. Bioject Inc. commenced operations in 1985.
Bioject  Medical  Technologies  Inc.  was formed in  December  1992 for the sole
purpose of acquiring  all the capital stock of Bioject  Medical  Systems Ltd., a
company   organized  under  the  laws  of  British   Columbia,   Canada,   in  a
stock-for-stock  exchange.  This stock acquisition  established  Bioject Medical
Technologies Inc., a U.S. domestic  corporation,  as the publicly-traded  parent
company of Bioject Inc. and Bioject Medical Systems Ltd. Bioject Medical Systems
Ltd.  was  then  terminated  in  fiscal  1997.  Our  blood  glucose   monitoring
development  operations  were conducted by Marathon  Medical  Technologies  Inc.
("Marathon   Medical")   (formerly   Bioject  JV  Subsidiary  Inc.),  an  Oregon
corporation,  which is our wholly owned subsidiary. The blood glucose monitoring
development  operation was  discontinued in June 1999. All references to Bioject
are to  Bioject  Medical  Technologies  Inc.  and its  subsidiaries,  unless the
context  requires  otherwise.  Bioject's  executive  offices and  operations are
located at 7620 SW Bridgeport  Road,  Portland,  Oregon 97224, and our telephone
number is (503) 639-7221.

We  manufacture  and market a professional  needle-free  injection  system,  the
Biojector(R)  2000, which allows healthcare  professionals to inject medications
through the skin, both  intramuscularly  and  subcutaneously,  without a needle.
Using this technology to administer  injections virtually eliminates the risk of
contaminated   needlestick  injuries  and  the  resulting  blood-borne  pathogen
transmission,  which is a major concern throughout the healthcare industry.  The
Biojector  2000  system  consists  of  two  components:  a  handheld,   reusable
jet-injector  (the  "Biojector  2000" or  "B-2000")  and a  sterile,  single-use
disposable syringe (the "Biojector  syringe").  We also manufacture and market a
device  that  allows the  Biojector  syringe to be filled  without a needle (the
"Vial  Adapter").  The Vial Adapter may be purchased  either  separately or as a
pre-packaged  component of the B-2000  system.  The B-2000  system is capable of
delivering  needle-free  injections in varying doses up to 1 ml. The Company has
also developed the B-2020 and B-4000 jet-injection systems. The B-2020 system is
similar  in design  and  intended  use to the B-2000  system  except  that it is
designed to deliver  injections in varying doses up to 1.5 ml. The B-4000 system
is intended to be used by  non-professionals  to  self-administer  injections of
various  medications  in  varying  doses up to 1 ml.  We have  not yet  received
regulatory  clearance to begin selling either the B-2020 or the B-4000  systems.
We  are  also  developing  a  single-use  disposable  and  multi-use  disposable
injector,   the  "Iject"  intended  to  be  used  by  both   professionals   and
non-professionals  to either administer or  self-administer  medications up to 1
ml. We have not yet applied for regulatory clearance for this product.

We also  market the  Vitajet 3  (R),("Vitajet")  a  spring-powered,  needle-free
self-injection  device,  the rights to which were acquired in a transaction with
Vitajet  Corporation  in  March  1998.  The  Vitajet  currently  has  regulatory
clearance for administering injections of insulin.

Our long-term  goal is to establish  our  needle-free  injection  systems as the
preferred drug delivery method for all medications administered by intramuscular
or subcutaneous injection. Bioject focuses its current product sales efforts for
the Biojector 2000 system on: i) flu  immunization  clinics and  providers;  ii)
healthcare providers in states such as California, where legislation is in place
that favors  alternatives  to  needle-syringes;  iii)  potentially  high volume,
national accounts that will use or distribute  Bioject's products across a large
region;  and iv) the U.S.  military.  We are also  focusing  efforts to sell the
B-2000 to multiple sclerosis patients through a distributor.

We  have   established   manufacturing   capability   for  the  Vitajet  at  our
manufacturing  facility in Portland,  Oregon,  and plan to enter into agreements
with  distributors  to sell the Vitajet to insulin users. We are also developing
various marketing strategies to sell the Vitajet directly to end-users.

We are actively pursuing  strategic  partnering  relationships  with a number of
pharmaceutical  and  biotechnology  companies  under  which  we  plan  to  grant
specified  rights  or  licenses  to some or all of our  products.  The  strategy
anticipates that the rights or licenses will allow strategic  partners to i) use
the licensed  products for specific  applications  or purposes or ii) market the
licensed products in conjunction with certain of their products.



                                       4
<PAGE>

Under a January 1995,  agreement  with Hoffman  LaRoche Inc.  ("Roche")  Bioject
agreed to develop a needle-free  injection  system for Roche to use with certain
of its products.  The B-2020 system was designed as a result of this  agreement.
Bioject  and Roche  intended  that Roche  would be granted  worldwide  rights to
distribute the B-2020 for a specific class of medications.  In June 1999,  Roche
advised  us that  because  of the  additional  time  and cost  required  to gain
regulatory  clearance to use the B-2020 in conjunction  with the Roche drugs and
because  of an  overall  change  in its  marketing  strategy  for the  drugs  in
question,   it  did  not  intend  to  pursue  distributing  the  B-2020  and  is
relinquishing its exclusive rights to the product.

In  September  1997,  we  entered  into a  joint  venture  agreement  with  Elan
Corporation  plc. for the  development  and  commercialization  of certain blood
glucose monitoring technology which the Company licensed from Elan. In May 1999,
rather  than  continue  to fund the cost of its  development,  we  entered  into
negotiations to sell Marathon's blood glucose monitoring technology, and certain
fixed assets related to developing the  technology,  to a third party.  The sale
was  completed  on June 30,  1999.  The  gross  proceeds  from the sale  were $4
million.  The gain realized on the sale was approximately  $2.9 million,  net of
associated  expenses of the transaction and a $500,000 provision for expenses to
wind-up Marathon's operations.

The terms of the sale of the blood glucose  monitoring  technology  also provide
for Bioject to receive a royalty on net sales of future products,  if any, which
may be developed in the future from the licensed technology. The agreement calls
for royalty  payments of three  percent of net sales until  Bioject has received
total royalty payments of $10 million. The agreement then calls for a royalty of
one  percent of net sales  thereafter.  There can be no  assurance  that  future
products  will be  successfully  developed  from the  blood  glucose  monitoring
technology or that such products, if developed, will be commercially successful.
In  connection  with the sale of the blood  glucose  monitoring  technology,  we
entered into an agreement  with Elan to purchase its 19.9% common stock interest
in Marathon.  We now own 100% of Marathon's stock.

In July 1998,  we entered into an  agreement  with Merck & Co.  ("Merck")  which
provided  Merck  limited-term  rights to use the  B-2000  needle-free  injection
system with selected  Merck  vaccines.  As part of the  agreement,  Bioject also
granted Merck  exclusive  rights to negotiate a long-term  license to the B-2000
for certain medical indications. We received $1.5 million in non-refundable fees
under this  agreement in the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999. In February 1999,
citing a refinement in its vaccine development  strategy,  Merck advised us that
it would  not  continue  discussions  to seek  long-term  license  rights to our
technology. No further fees are due to us from Merck pursuant to the agreement.

In June 1999, we entered into a binding  letter  agreement  with Amgen Inc. that
provided for an evaluation of Bioject's  jet injection  technology  for use with
certain  biopharmaceutical  products.  Terms of the agreement provided for up to
$500,000 in licensing and technology fees based upon meeting certain milestones.
On  February  29,  2000,  we entered  into a  development  and  clinical  supply
agreement  with Amgen for the delivery of an Amgen  product  with our  Iject(TM)
needle-free  injection  system.  In connection with the agreement,  Amgen made a
$1.5 million investment in Bioject's common stock.

In October 1999, Bioject announced a strategic alliance with AngioSense, Inc. to
jointly develop  innovative  delivery systems to treat  cardiovascular  disease.
Bioject's  needle-free  drug  delivery  systems will be modified for  delivering
bio-therapeutic  solutions  as a  surgical  instrument  for  minimally  invasive
surgical  procedures  with  several  proprietary  catheters  being  developed by
AngioSense for  catheter-based  cardiology  interventions.  The alliance  grants
AngioSense an exclusive license to Bioject's  Biojector 2000(R) and Vitajet 3(R)
jet  injectors,  as well as a  customized  version  of  Bioject's  Iject(TM),  a
single-use disposable jet injector with a self-contained,  pre-filled medication
cartridge to treat or diagnose cardiac or cardiovascular diseases.  According to
the terms of the agreement, Bioject received an equity position of approximately
10  percent  in  AngioSense  upon  completion  of  certain  product  development
milestones.  In addition to a long-term  manufacturing and supply agreement with
AngioSense,  Bioject will receive  royalties on future product  sales,  and will
receive  significant  funding  to  support  the  development  of the  disposable
injector portion of the AngioSense delivery system.

In December 1999, Bioject and Serono  Laboratories,  Inc., the U.S. affiliate of
Ares-Serono,  S.A., a leading  biotechnology  company  headquartered  in Geneva,
Switzerland,  announced an exclusive license agreement in the U.S. and Canada to
deliver Serono's  Saizen(R)  recombinant  human growth hormone with a customized
version of Bioject's  Vitajet(TM) 3 needle-free  delivery system.  In connection
with the agreement, Serono paid an undisclosed



                                       5
<PAGE>

license fee to Bioject and signed a definitive  supply  agreement that commences
upon FDA clearance.  Clinical studies evaluating the bioequivalence of Saizen(R)
when delivered with the Bioject needle-free delivery system have been completed.
A 510(k)  pre-market  notification  has been submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA).

A primary focus of our research  efforts is on clinical  research in the area of
DNA-based  vaccines  and  medications.  To the  best of our  knowledge,  our jet
injection  device is being used in two clinical  studies relating to development
of DNA-based medications.  Currently, to the best of our knowledge,  our devices
are being used in more than twenty  DNA-related  clinical research projects both
within and  outside of the United  States.  These  research  projects  are being
conducted by companies leading the development of DNA-based  medications as well
as by the leading universities and governmental institutions conducting research
in this  area.  Included  in these  studies  are a Phase I  clinical  trial of a
DNA-based lymphoma vaccine being conducted at Stanford  University and a Phase I
clinical trial of a DNA-based  malaria vaccine being conducted at the U.S. Naval
Medical  Research  Center.  Preliminary  data from clinical studies with animals
indicates  that  the  use of the  Biojector  technology  may  result  in  better
performance of some DNA-based  medications  than can be achieved  through use of
conventional  needle-syringes.  There can be no assurance that further  clinical
studies  will  prove  conclusively  that our  technology  is more  effective  in
delivering  DNA-based  medications  than  alternative  delivery systems that are
currently available or that may be developed in the future.

In  January  2000,  we filed a resale  registration  statement  on Form S-3,  to
register 169,619 shares of our common stock for resale by selling  shareholders.
We will not  receive  any  proceeds  from the sale of any of the shares  sold by
selling shareholders.

"Biojector," "Bioject," "Vitajet" and "Medivax" are registered trademarks of the
Company.






                                       6
<PAGE>

                           FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Registration Statement and the documents incorporated
by  reference  to  this  Registration   Statement  constitute   "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the Private  Securities  Litigation Reform Act
of 1995.  Any  statements  that express or involve  discussions  with respect to
predictions,  expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions
or future events or performance  (often, but not always,  using words or phrases
such as "expects" or "does not expect," "is  expected,"  "anticipates"  or "does
not  anticipate,"  "plans,"  "estimates"  or  "intends," or stating that certain
actions,  events or results "may," "could," "would," "might" or "will" be taken,
occur  or be  achieved)  are  not  statements  of  historical  fact  and  may be
"forward-looking  statements." Such forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown  risks,  uncertainties  and other  factors  which  may cause the  actual
results,  performance or achievements  of Bioject,  or industry  results,  to be
materially  different  from any future  results,  performance,  or  achievements
expressed   or  implied  by  such   forward-looking   statements.   Such  risks,
uncertainties  and factors  include,  among others,  those described under "Risk
Factors" and identified as risks or uncertainties in the documents  incorporated
by reference.

                                  RISK FACTORS

An investment in the Shares  involves a high degree of risk. You should consider
carefully the following  risk factors,  together with the other  information  in
this Prospectus, before buying any Shares. You should also be aware that certain
statements  contained  in this  Prospectus  that are not  related to  historical
results are forward-looking  statements.  These forward-looking statements, such
as statements of our strategies, plans, objectives, expectations and intentions,
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

If our  products are not accepted by the market,  our business  could fail.  Our
success  will depend on market  acceptance  of our  needle-free  injection  drug
delivery systems, the Biojector 2000 system and the Vitajet system and on market
acceptance of other products under  development.  If our products do not achieve
market acceptance,  our business could fail. Currently,  the dominant technology
used for intramuscular and subcutaneous injections is the hollow-needle syringe.
Needle-syringes,  while low in cost, have limitations,  particularly relating to
contaminated  needlestick  injuries.  Use  of  the  Biojector  2000  system  for
intramuscular  and  subcutaneous  injections  eliminates the associated  risk of
these injuries;  however,  the cost per injection is significantly  higher.  The
Biojector 2000, the Vitajet system or any of our products under  development may
be unable to compete successfully with  needle-syringes.  A previous needle-free
injection system  manufactured by us did not achieve market acceptance and is no
longer being  marketed.  The  Biojector  2000 was  introduced  in January  1993.
Failure of the  Biojector  2000  system to gain market  acceptance  would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We have reduced our sales force and may be unable to penetrate  targeted  market
segments. In late fiscal 1998 and early fiscal 1999, we dramatically reduced our
direct product sales force from one national and five district sales managers to
one  national  sales  manager  who is focused on  specifically  targeted  market
segments.  This  reduced  sales  force  may not  have  sufficient  resources  to
adequately  penetrate one or more of the targeted market segments.  Further,  if
the sales force is successful in penetrating  one or more of the targeted market
segments,  we are unable to assure you that our  products  will be  accepted  in
those segments or that product acceptance will result in product revenues which,
together with revenues from corporate  licensing and supply agreements,  will be
sufficient for us to operate profitably.

We may be  unable  to  enter  into  Strategic  Corporate  Licensing  and  Supply
Agreements,  which could cause our  business to suffer.  A key  component of our
sales and marketing strategy is to enter into licensing and supply  arrangements
with leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies whose products Bioject's
technology provides either increased medical effectiveness or a higher degree of
market  acceptance.  If we cannot enter into these agreements on terms favorable
to us or at all,  our business may suffer.  In January  1995,  Bioject and Roche
entered  into an  agreement,  whereby the parties  anticipated  that the product
development  phase of the agreement would develop into a supply and distribution
agreement  between Bioject and Roche. In June 1999, Roche advised us that due to
a longer and more costly than expected  regulatory  process to gain clearance to
use the B-2020 in  conjunction  with  Roche's  products,  Roche had  changed its
marketing strategy. In making that change in marketing




                                       7
<PAGE>

strategy,  Roche was abandoning its exclusive  distribution rights to the B-2020
and would not be  seeking a supply of the  B-2020  from  Bioject.  In July 1998,
Bioject  and  Merck  & Co.  entered  into  an  agreement,  whereby  the  parties
anticipated  that the  initial  July 1998,  agreement  would lead to a long-term
licensing and supply  agreement  between the two  companies.  In February  1999,
Merck & Co.  advised us that it would not  continue,  at the  present  time,  to
pursue exclusive license to or supply of our products.  Both of these agreements
resulted in significant short-term revenue. Neither agreement developed into the
long-term revenue stream anticipated by our strategic  partnering  strategy.  We
may be unable to enter into future  licensing  or supply  agreements  with major
pharmaceutical  or  biotechnology  companies.   Even  if  we  enter  into  these
agreements,  they may not result in sustainable  long-term  revenues which, when
combined with revenues from product sales, could be sufficient for us to operate
profitably.

An important  component of our corporate licensing and supply agreement strategy
is  specifically  targeted  at  entering  into  agreements  of this  nature with
pharmaceutical  and biotechnology  companies  developing  DNA-based vaccines and
medications. The component of the strategy which focuses on companies developing
DNA-based  therapies  arises in great part from  preliminary  data from clinical
studies with animals which  indicates  that use of the Biojector  technology may
result in better performance of some DNA-based  medications than can be achieved
through  the use of  traditional  needle-syringes.  We  cannot  assure  you that
further  clinical  studies will prove  conclusively  that our technology is more
effective in delivering DNA-based  medications than alternative delivery systems
that are either  currently  available  or that may be  developed  in the future.
Further,  should  our  technology  prove  to be  more  effective  in  delivering
DNA-based medications,  we may be unable to gain regulatory clearance to deliver
any DNA-based  medications  using our  products.  Further,  even if  intradermal
delivery of DNA-based  medications  is critical to  effective  delivery of those
compounds,  we may be  unable  to  gain  regulatory  clearance  for  intradermal
delivery of DNA-based medications with our products.  In addition,  there can be
no  assurance  that any company will be  successful  in  developing  one or more
DNA-based  therapies  or  successful  in  bringing  those  therapies  to market.
Further,  should  any  companies  be  successful  in  developing  and  marketing
DNA-based therapies,  we may be unable to enter into long-term license or supply
agreements with any such company,  which could cause our financial condition and
results of operations to suffer.

We may  never  receive  future  royalties  from  the  Blood  Glucose  Monitoring
Technology,  which could cause our financial  condition to suffer.  In May 1999,
rather  than  continue  to fund the cost of its  development,  we  entered  into
negotiations to sell Marathon's blood glucose monitoring technology, and certain
fixed assets related to developing the  technology,  to a third party.  The sale
was  completed  on June 30,  1999.  The terms of the sale of the  blood  glucose
monitoring technology provide for us to receive a royalty on net sales of future
products,  if any,  which  may be  developed  in the  future  from the  licensed
technology.  The  agreement  calls for a royalty  of three  percent of net sales
until we have received total royalty payments of $10 million. The agreement then
calls  for  royalty  payment  of one  percent  of net sales  thereafter.  Future
products may never be successfully  developed from the blood glucose  monitoring
technology,  and if  products  are  developed,  they  may  not  be  commercially
successful,  which would mean that we would receive no future royalties and this
could cause our financial condition to suffer.

We have a history or losses and may never be profitable.  Since our formation in
1985, we have incurred  significant  annual  operating  losses and negative cash
flow. At December 31, 1999, we had an  accumulated  deficit of $59 million.  $47
million of the accumulated deficit relates to losses incurred in the needle-free
segment of our  operations.  $12 million of the  accumulated  deficit relates to
losses from our operations to develop the blood glucose  monitoring  technology.
We may never be  profitable,  which  could have a  negative  effect on our stock
price. Historically, our revenues have been derived primarily from licensing and
technology  fees  and  from  limited  product  sales.  The  product  sales  were
principally  sales to dealers in order to stock  their  inventories  and to HMI.
More  recently,  we have sold our  products to  end-users,  primarily  to public
health  clinics  for   vaccinations  and  to  nursing   organizations   for  flu
immunizations.  We have not attained profitability at these sales levels. We may
never be able to generate significant revenues or achieve profitability. Because
of these  uncertainties  at March 31, 1999, our independent  public  accountants
qualified  their  opinion  with  respect to our  ability to  continue as a going
concern.

We will need  additional  financing in the future,  and if we cannot  obtain the
necessary  financing  our  business  could  fail.  To date,  our  revenues  from
operations have not been sufficient to meet our cash requirements.  As a result,
since our inception in 1985, we have financed our  operations,  working  capital
needs and capital expenditures  primarily from private placements of securities,
exercises of stock options,  proceeds  received from our initial public offering
in 1986,  proceeds  received from a public  offering of Common Stock in November
1993, licensing and technology revenues,  equity investments from Elan, proceeds
from the sale of the glucose monitoring technology


                                       8
<PAGE>

and more  recently  through  sales of products.  We plan to fund our future cash
requirements through revenues, debt, and sales of equity securities. However, we
may be unable to obtain the financing sufficient to fund our business activities
on favorable terms or at all. Failure to obtain adequate  financing would have a
material  adverse  impact  on our  business.  In  addition,  sale of our  equity
securities on unfavorable terms to meet our obligations could result in material
dilution to the existing shareholders.

We have  outstanding  convertible  preferred  stock,  which is convertible  into
common  stock at prices  which  may be lower  than  market  price at the time of
conversion which could result in dilution to existing common stock holders.  Our
Common  Stock is subject to the  rights  and  preferences  of the Series A and C
Convertible  Preferred Stock, which may be converted into common stock at prices
which  may be  lower  than  market  price  at the  time  of  conversion  causing
substantial  dilution  to  existing  holders  of  common  stock.  The  Series  A
Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible to Common Stock at a conversion price
of $7.50 per share.  The Series C Preferred Stock is convertible to Common Stock
at a  conversion  price of $3.0625  per share.  In October,  2004,  unless it is
converted earlier by the holders or redeemed by us, the shares of Series A and C
Convertible   Preferred   Stock  and  accrued  but  unpaid   dividends   convert
automatically into Common Stock.

We have  limited  manufacturing  experience,  and may be unable to  produce  our
products at the unit costs  necessary for the products to be  competitive in the
market,  which could cause our  financial  condition to suffer.  We have limited
experience manufacturing our products in commercially viable quantities. We have
increased  our  production  capacity  for  the  Biojector  2000  system  through
automation of, and changes in, production  methods,  in order to achieve savings
through  higher  volumes  of  production.  If we are  unable to do so,  then our
results of operations and financial condition could suffer. The current cost per
injection  of the  Biojector  2000 system is  substantially  higher than that of
traditional  needle-syringes,  our principal  competition.  A key element of our
business  strategy  has been to reduce the overall  manufacturing  cost  through
automating production and packaging.  This automation is substantially complete.
There can be no assurance that we will achieve sales and  manufacturing  volumes
necessary to realize cost savings from volume  production at levels necessary to
result in significant unit manufacturing cost reductions.  Failure to do so will
continue  to make  competing  with  needle-syringes  on the  basis of cost  very
difficult  and will  adversely  affect our  financial  condition  and results of
operations.  While we believe that our  experience  manufacturing  the Biojector
enhances the  probability of its success in  manufacturing  the Vitajet or other
devices we may develop, we have had limited experience manufacturing the Vitajet
and as of March 31, 1999, had only recently completed installing a manufacturing
line to produce the Vitajet.  We may be unable to  successfully  manufacture the
Vitajet or other  device at a unit cost that will  allow the  product to be sold
profitably.  Failure to do so would adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operation.

We are subject to extensive  government  regulation  and must continue to comply
with  these  regulations  or  our  business  could  suffer.   Our  products  and
manufacturing  operations are subject to extensive government regulation in both
the U.S.  and  abroad.  If we cannot  comply with these  regulations,  we may be
unable to distribute  our products,  which could cause our business to suffer or
fail.  In the U.S.,  the  development,  manufacture,  marketing and promotion of
medical devices are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration  ("FDA") under
the  Federal  Food,  Drug,  and  Cosmetic  Act  ("FD&C").  In 1987,  we received
clearance  from the FDA under  Section  510(k) of the FD&C to market a hand-held
CO2-powered  needle-free  injection system. The FD&C provides that new premarket
notifications  under  Section  510(k) of the FD&C are required to be filed when,
among other things,  there is a major change or modification in the intended use
of a device or a change or modification to a legally  marketed device that could
significantly  affect  its safety or  effectiveness.  A device  manufacturer  is
expected  to make the  initial  determination  as to  whether  the change to its
device or its intended use is of a kind that would  necessitate  the filing of a
new 510(k) notification. Although the Biojector 2000 system incorporates changes
from the system with respect to which our 1987 510(k)  marketing  clearance  was
received and expands its intended use, we made the determination that these were
not major changes or modifications in intended use or changes in the device that
could   significantly   affect  the  safety  or  effectiveness  of  the  device.
Accordingly, we further concluded that the 1987 510(k) clearance permitted us to
market the Biojector 2000 system in the U.S. In June 1994, we received clearance
from the FDA under 510(k) to market a version of its Biojector  2000 system in a
configuration targeted at high volume injection  applications.  In October 1996,
we received 510(k) clearance for a needle-free disposable vial access device. In
March 1997, we received additional 510(k) clearance for certain  enhancements to
our Biojector 2000 system.  We currently have an application  pending before the
FDA for 510(k) clearance for  modification to the Vitajet 3 device.  The FDA may
not concur with our  determination  that our current and future  products can be
qualified by means of a 510(k) submission.



                                       9
<PAGE>

Future  changes to  manufacturing  procedures  could  require that we file a new
510(k) notification.  Also, future products, product enhancements or changes, or
changes in product use may require  clearance under Section 510(k),  or they may
require FDA premarket approval ("PMA") or other regulatory clearances.  PMAs and
regulatory  clearances  other  than  510(k)  clearance  generally  involve  more
extensive  prefiling  testing  than a 510(k)  clearance  and a longer FDA review
process.  Under current FDA policy,  applications  involving pre-filled syringes
would be evaluated by the FDA as drugs rather than  devices,  requiring  FDA new
drug  applications  ("NDAS")  or ANDAs.  Depending  on the  circumstances,  drug
regulation can be much more extensive and time consuming than device regulation.

FDA regulatory processes are time consuming and expensive.  Product applications
submitted  by us may not be cleared or  approved by the FDA.  In  addition,  our
products must be manufactured in compliance  with Good  Manufacturing  Practices
("GMP")  as  specified  in  regulations  under  the FDA Act.  The FDA has  broad
discretion in enforcing the FDA Act, and noncompliance with the Act could result
in a variety of  regulatory  actions  ranging  from product  detentions,  device
alerts or field corrections, to mandatory recalls, seizures, injunctive actions,
and civil or criminal penalties.

If we  cannot  meet  international  product  standards,  we  will be  unable  to
distribute  our  products  outside of the United  States  which  could cause our
business to suffer.  Distribution  of our products in  countries  other than the
U.S. may be subject to regulation in those  countries.  Failure to satisfy these
regulations would impact our ability to sell our products in these countries and
could cause our business to suffer. In June 1998, we received certification from
TUV Product Services for our quality system, which meets the requirements of ISO
9001 and EN 46001. In June 1999, TUV Product Services audited our quality system
and found that it still meets the requirements of ISO 9001. In November 1999, we
received certification from TUV Product Services for the applicable requirements
of  EC-Directive   93/42/EEC  Annex.   II.3  Medical  Device   Directive.   This
certification  allows us to label our products with the CE Mark and sell them in
the European  Community.  We may be unable to continue to meet the  standards of
ISO 9001 or CE Mark certification.

If  the  healthcare  industry  limits  coverage  or  reimbursement  levels,  the
acceptance of our products could suffer.  The price of our products  exceeds the
price of  needle-syringes  and if coverage or reimbursement  levels are reduced,
market  acceptance of our products could be harmed.  The healthcare  industry is
subject to changing  political,  economic  and  regulatory  influences  that may
affect the procurement practices and operations of healthcare facilities. During
the past several years,  the  healthcare  industry has been subject to increased
government  regulation of reimbursement  rates and capital  expenditures.  Among
other  things,  third party  payers are  increasingly  attempting  to contain or
reduce  healthcare  costs by limiting both coverage and levels of  reimbursement
for healthcare products and procedures.  Because the price of the Biojector 2000
system exceeds the price of needle-syringe, cost control policies of third party
payers,  including government agencies,  may adversely affect acceptance and use
of the Biojector 2000 system.

We are highly  dependent on  third-party  relationships,  and our business could
suffer if we cannot  maintain  these  relationships.  We are  dependent on third
parties  for  distribution  of the  Biojector  2000  system  to  certain  market
segments,  for the manufacture of component  parts,  and for assistance with the
development  and  distribution  of future  application-specific  systems.  If we
cannot  maintain  these  relationships,  or if the third  parties  are unable to
provide the services we require, our business could suffer.

Our current  manufacturing  processes  for the  Biojector  2000 jet injector and
disposable  syringes as well as  manufacturing  processes to produce the Vitajet
consist primarily of assembling  component parts supplied by outside  suppliers.
Some of these components are currently  obtained from single sources,  with some
components  requiring  significant  production  lead times. In the past, we have
experienced  delays in the delivery of certain  components.  To date such delays
have not had a material  adverse  effect on our  operations.  We may  experience
delays in the future,  and these delays could have a material  adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.

In the past, we have entered into agreements  with certain major  pharmaceutical
or  biotechnology  companies for  development  and  distribution  of needle-free
injection  systems  and  for  use  of  our  needle-free   injection  systems  in
conjunction with the pharmaceutical  companies'  products.  In all cases to date
these  companies  have had the right to terminate  those  agreements  at certain
phases as defined in the agreements. In several instances, those agreements have
been terminated before yielding sustained  long-term  licensing or product sales
revenues. Entering into




                                       10
<PAGE>

agreements of this nature is an important part of our overall business strategy.
We may be unable to interest any major pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies
in entering into such  agreements.  If interested  parties are found,  we may be
unsuccessful  at negotiating  and entering into  long-term  licensing and supply
agreements with the interested parties.  Further, if such agreements are entered
into, there can be no assurance that the companies'  interest and  participation
in  the   agreements  and  projects  will  continue  and  result  in  long-term,
sustainable  revenues as  contemplated  by this  aspect of our overall  business
strategy.  Failure to enter into future licensing and product supply  agreements
with major pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies and failure of those future
agreements  to result  in  significant,  sustainable  long-term  revenues  could
adversely affect our financial condition.

If we are unable to manage our growth,  our results of operations  could suffer.
If our products  achieve  market  acceptance or if we are successful in entering
into  product  supply  agreements  with major  pharmaceutical  or  biotechnology
companies,  we expect to  experience  rapid  growth.  Such growth would  require
expanded customer service and support, increased personnel, expanded operational
and financial systems, and implementing new and expanded control procedures.  We
may be unable to attract sufficient  qualified  personnel or successfully manage
expanded operations.  As we expand, we may periodically  experience  constraints
that would adversely  affect our ability to satisfy  customer demand in a timely
fashion.  Failure  to manage  growth  effectively  could  adversely  affect  our
financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to compete in the medical  equipment  field,  which could cause
our business to fail. The medical  equipment  market is highly  competitive  and
competition  is likely to  intensify.  If we cannot  compete,  our business will
fail. Our products compete primarily with traditional  needle-syringes,  "safety
syringes"  and also with  other  alternative  drug  delivery  systems.  While we
believe our products  provide a superior drug delivery  method,  there can be no
assurance  that we will be able to compete  successfully  with existing or newly
developed drug delivery products.  Many of our competitors have longer operating
histories as well as substantially greater financial,  technical,  marketing and
customer  support  resources.  One or more of these  competitors  may develop an
alternative  drug delivery system that competes more directly with our products,
and our products may be unable to compete successfully with such a product.

We are dependent on a single technology, and if it cannot compete or find market
acceptance,  our  business  will  suffer.  Our  strategy  has been to focus  our
development and marketing efforts on our needle-free injection technology. Focus
on this  single  technology  leaves us  vulnerable  to  competing  products  and
alternative  drug  delivery  systems.  If  our  technology  cannot  find  market
acceptance or cannot compete against other  technologies,  business will suffer.
We  perceive  that  healthcare  providers'  desire  to  minimize  the use of the
traditional   needle-syringe   has  stimulated   development  of  a  variety  of
alternative  drug  delivery  systems such as "safety  syringes,"  jet  injection
systems,  nasal  delivery  systems  and  transdermal  diffusion  "patches".   In
addition,  pharmaceutical companies frequently attempt to develop drugs for oral
delivery instead of injection. While we believes that for the foreseeable future
there will  continue be a  significant  need for  injections,  alternative  drug
delivery methods may be developed which are preferable to injection.

We rely on patents and proprietary rights to protect our proprietary technology.
We rely on a  combination  of  trade  secrets,  confidentiality  agreements  and
procedures,  and patents to protect our proprietary  technologies.  We have been
granted a number of patents in the United  States and  several  patents in other
countries  covering  certain  technology  embodied in our current jet  injection
system and certain manufacturing  processes.  Additional patent applications are
pending in the U.S. and certain foreign  countries.  The claims contained in any
patent application may not be allowed, or any patent or our patents collectively
will not provide  adequate  protection for our products and  technology.  In the
absence of patent protection, we may be vulnerable to competitors who attempt to
copy our products or gain access to its trade secrets and know-how. In addition,
the laws of foreign  countries  may not protect our  proprietary  rights to this
technology  to the  same  extent  as the  laws of the U.S.  We  believe  we have
independently  developed our  technology and attempt to ensure that our products
do  not  infringe  the  proprietary  rights  of  others.  We  know  of  no  such
infringement claims. However, any claims could have a material adverse affect on
our financial condition and results of operations.

If our products fail or cause harm, we could be subject to  substantial  product
liability which could cause our business to suffer. Producers of medical devices
may face substantial liability for damages in the event of product failure or if
it is alleged the product caused harm. We currently  maintain product  liability
insurance and, to date, have experienced only one product liability claim. There
can be no assurance, however, that we will not be




                                       11
<PAGE>

subject to a number of such claims,  that our products liability insurance would
cover such claims,  or that adequate  insurance will continue to be available to
us on acceptable terms in the future.  Our business could be adversely  affected
by product liability claims or by the cost of insuring against such claims.

We are highly  dependent on our key employees,  and our business could suffer if
they were to leave.  Our  success  depends  on the  retention  of our  executive
officers and other key employees. Competition exists for qualified personnel and
our  success  will  depend,  in part,  on  attracting  and  retaining  qualified
personnel.  Failure in these efforts could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition or results of operations.

There are a large number of shares  eligible for sale into the public  market in
the near  future,  which may reduce the price of our  common  stock.  The market
price of our common  stock could  decline as a result of sales of a large number
of shares of our common stock in the market,  or the perception  that such sales
could occur.  We have a large number of shares of common stock  outstanding  and
available for resale  beginning at various  points in time in the future.  These
sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity  securities in the
future  at a time and at a price  that we deem  appropriate.  The  shares of our
common  stock  currently  outstanding  will  become  eligible  for sale  without
registration  pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act,  subject to certain
conditions  of Rule 144.  Certain  holders of our common stock also have certain
demand and piggyback  registration rights enabling them to register their shares
under the Securities Act for sale. We have registered  approximately 2.4 million
shares for resale on Form S-3  registration  statements as well as approximately
1.03 million  shares  issuable upon exercise of warrants.  In addition,  we have
approximately 3.7 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our
stock option plan.  As of December 31, 1999,  options to purchase  approximately
580,000 shares of common stock were outstanding and will be eligible for sale in
the public  market  from time to time  subject to vesting.  These stock  options
generally  have  exercise  prices  significantly  below the current price of our
common  stock.  The possible  sale of a  significant  number of these shares may
cause the price of our common stock to fall.

We may be unable to maintain our listing on Nasdaq,  which could cause our stock
price to fall and decrease the liquidity of our common  stock.  Our Common Stock
is quoted on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market. If we cannot comply with the continuing
requirements,  we may be delisted  which could cause the stock price to fall and
decrease the liquidity of our common stock for existing shareholders.  There are
a number of  continuing  requirements  that must be met in order for the  Common
Stock to remain  eligible  for  quotation on the NASDAQ  National  Market or the
NASDAQ  SmallCap  Market.  The failure to meet the  maintenance  criteria in the
future  could result in the  delisting of our Common Stock from NASDAQ.  In such
event, trading, if any, in the Common Stock may then continue to be conducted in
the non- NASDAQ  over-the-counter  market.  As a result, an investor may find it
more difficult to dispose of or to obtain  accurate  quotations as to the market
value of our Common Stock.  In addition,  if the Common Stock were delisted from
trading on NASDAQ and the trading price of the Common Stock were less than $5.00
per share, trading in the Common Stock would also be subject to the requirements
of certain rules  promulgated  under the Exchange Act, which require  additional
disclosure by  broker-dealers  in connection  with any trades  involving a stock
defined as a penny stock. The additional  burdens imposed on broker-dealers  may
discourage  broker-dealers  from effecting  transactions in penny stocks,  which
could  reduce the  liquidity  of the shares of Common  Stock and thereby  have a
material adverse effect on the trading market for the securities.

On April 9, 1999, we were advised by NASDAQ that we were out of compliance  with
the NASDAQ rule that  requires  companies  listed on the  exchange to maintain a
minimum bid price of $1.00 for their stock. On July 9, 1999, the last sale price
of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ  National  Market System was $0.50
per share. On October 13, 1999, a one-for-five reverse stock split was effected.
At July 15,1999,  29,011,236 shares of Common Stock were outstanding, as well as
options,  warrants  and  convertible  preferred  stock to acquire an  additional
24,378,928 shares of Common Stock. The Reverse Stock Split, decreased the number
of outstanding  shares of Common Stock to  approximately  5.8 million shares and
approximately  4.8 million  shares were  reserved for issuance  upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and the conversion of convertible preferred stock.
As of December 31, 1999,  approximately  89.1 million  shares are  available for
future issuances.

Our stock price may be highly  volatile,  which increases the risk of securities
litigation.  The  market for our Common  Stock and for the  securities  of other
early-stage,  small market-capitalization  companies has been highly volatile in
recent years. This increases the risk of securities  litigation relating to such
volatility.  We believe that factors such as quarter-to-quarter  fluctuations in
financial  results,  reduction  in the number of  outstanding  shares due to the
recent reverse stock split, new product  introductions by us or our competition,
public announcements,




                                       12
<PAGE>

changing  regulatory  environments,  sales of Common  Stock by certain  existing
shareholders,  substantial  product  orders and  announcement  of  licensing  or
product supply agreements with major  pharmaceutical or biotechnology  companies
could contribute to the volatility of the price of our Common Stock,  causing it
to fluctuate  dramatically.  General economic trends such as recessionary cycles
and changing  interest rates may also  adversely  affect the market price of our
Common Stock.


                                 USE OF PROCEEDS

The Shares  offered  hereby are being  registered for the account of the Selling
Shareholders and, accordingly,  we will not receive any of the proceeds from the
sale of the Shares.


                              SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

The Shares being  offered for resale by the Selling  Shareholders  were acquired
either in connection with the exercise by a Series "N" Warrant  Holder,  or will
be acquired upon exercise of warrants.  The term "Selling  Shareholder" includes
all persons  acquiring  securities  and persons  acquiring  such  securities  in
permitted  transfers  from the  original  holders  thereof in  transactions  not
requiring registration under the Securities Act.

The following  table sets forth  certain  information  regarding the  beneficial
ownership  of shares of Common Stock by the Selling  Shareholders  as of January
13, 2000, and as adjusted to reflect the sale of the Shares.

<TABLE>
                                          Number of Shares       Maximum Number of
                                           Owned Prior to        Shares to be Sold     Shares Owned After
Name                                          Offering         under this Prospectus   Offering (1) Number       Percent
- ----                                          --------         ---------------------   -------------------       -------
<S>                                       <C>                   <C>                     <C>                      <C>
Tower Rock Partners, LLC (2)                   2,326                 2,326                      0                   *
Richard Huson (3)                              3,488                 3,488                      0                   *
Summit Fund, LP                               11,628                11,628                      0                   *
Tiburon Fund, LP                              11,628                11,628                      0                   *
Amy Factor (4)                                   500                   500                      0                   *
Petkevich & Partners, LLC (5)                 16,000                16,000                      0                   *
Robert Gonnelli (6)                           96,049                96,049                      0                   *
Frederick Pierce (7)                          11,000                11,000                      0                   *
Sergio Landau(8)                              49,900                12,000                 37,900                   *
Total                                        202,519               164,619                 37,900                   *
- -----------------
</TABLE>

*    Less than 1%.
(1)  Assumes  that the  Selling  Shareholders  will sell all  Shares  during the
     effective period.
(2)  Includes  2,326 shares of Common Stock  issuable  upon exercise of a Series
     "N" warrant.
(3)  Includes  3,488 shares of Common Stock  issuable  upon exercise of a Series
     "N" warrant.
(4)  Includes 500 shares of Common Stock  issuable upon exercise of a Series "N"
     warrant.
(5)  Includes  16,000 shares of Common Stock  issuable upon exercise of a Series
     "O" warrant.
(6)  Includes  96,049  shares of Common Stock  issuable  upon exercise of Series
     "H," "I," "L" and "M" warrants.
(7)  Includes  (i) 3000 shares of Common  Stock and (ii) 8,000  shares of Common
     Stock issuable upon exercise of a Series "R" warrant.
(8)  Includes  3,000  shares of Common  Stock  held in the name of Mara  Landau,
     Sergio Landau's wife.

No  Selling  Shareholder  has held any  position  or office,  or other  material
relationship  with Bioject or any of its  predecessors or affiliates  within the
past three years with the exception of Amy Factor, Petkevich & Partners, LLC and
Robert Gonnelli,  who acted as financial advisors for Bioject , and Raphael LLC,
and Frederick Pierce who are currently acting as financial advisors to Bioject .




                                       13
<PAGE>

                              PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering the Shares on behalf of the Selling Stockholders.  As used in
this Prospectus,  the term "Selling  Stockholders"  includes donees and pledgees
selling Shares received from a named Selling  Stockholder after the date of this
Prospectus.  The  Selling  Stockholders  will offer and sell the Shares to which
this Prospectus relates for their own accounts. We will not receive any proceeds
from the  sale of the  Shares.  We will  bear all  costs,  expenses  and fees in
connection  with the  registration  of the  Shares.  Brokerage  commissions  and
similar selling expenses, if any, attributable to the sale of the Shares will be
borne by the Selling Stockholders.

The Selling  Stockholders may offer and sell the Shares from time to time in one
or more types of  transactions  (which may include  block  transactions)  on the
Nasdaq  SmallCap  Market,  in  transactions  directly  with market  makers or in
privately  negotiated  transactions,  through put or call options  transactions,
through  short  sales,  or a  combination  of such  methods  of sale,  at prices
relating to prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices.  Sales may be made
to or through  brokers or dealers  who may receive  compensation  in the form of
discounts,  concessions  or  commissions  from the Selling  Stockholders  or the
purchasers of the Shares. As of the date of this Prospectus, we are not aware of
any agreement, arrangement or understanding between any broker or dealer and the
Selling Stockholders regarding the sale of their Shares, nor are we aware of any
underwriter or  coordinating  broker acting in connection with the proposed sale
of Shares by the Selling  Stockholders.  There is no assurance  that the Selling
Stockholders will sell any or all of the Shares that they offer.

The Selling  Stockholders and any brokers or dealers who participate in the sale
of the  Shares  may be deemed to be  "underwriters"  within  the  meaning of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the  "Securities  Act"), and any commissions
received by them and any profits realized by them on the resale of Shares may be
deemed to be  underwriting  discounts or commissions  under the Securities  Act.
Because the Selling  Stockholders may be deemed to be "underwriters"  within the
meaning of the Securities Act, the Selling  Stockholders  will be subject to the
prospectus  delivery  requirements  of the Securities  Act. We have informed the
Selling  Stockholders  that the  anti-manipulative  provisions  of  Regulation M
promulgated under the Exchange Act may apply to their sales in the market.

The Selling  Stockholders may also resell all or a portion of the Shares in open
market transactions in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act, provided
it meets the criteria and conforms to the requirements of such Rule.

Upon notification to us by a Selling  Stockholder that any material  arrangement
has been entered  into with a broker or dealer for the sale of Shares  through a
block trade, special offering,  exchange distribution or secondary  distribution
or a purchase by a broker or dealer,  a supplement  to this  Prospectus  will be
filed, if required, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act, disclosing
(i) the name of each such Selling  Stockholder and of the participating  brokers
or dealers,  (ii) the number of Shares  involved,  (iii) the price at which such
Shares were sold, (iv) the commissions paid or discounts or concessions  allowed
to such brokers or dealers,  where applicable,  (v) that such brokers or dealers
did  not  conduct  any  investigation  to  verify  the  information  set  out or
incorporated  by reference in this  Prospectus  and (vi) other facts material to
the transaction.  In addition,  upon notification to us by a Selling Stockholder
that a donee or pledgee  intends to sell more than 500 Shares,  a supplement  to
this Prospectus will be filed.


                                  LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the issuance of the shares of Common Stock  offered  hereby will
be passed upon for us by Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Seattle, Washington.

                                     EXPERTS

The  consolidated  financial  statements   incorporated  by  reference  in  this
Prospectus  and  elsewhere in the  Registration  Statement  have been audited by
Arthur  Andersen  LLP,  independent  public  accountants,  as indicated in their
report  with  respect  thereto,  and are  incorporated  by  reference  herein in
reliance upon the  authority of said firm as experts in accounting  and auditing
in giving said report.



                                       14



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission