PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO
8-K, 1994-10-06
ELECTRIC & OTHER SERVICES COMBINED
Previous: PRICE T ROWE NEW INCOME FUND INC, 497, 1994-10-06
Next: PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO, S-3, 1994-10-06



<PAGE>
<PAGE> 1 

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

                           WASHINGTON, D. C.  20549 


                                FORM 8-K


                CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF 
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                         Date of Report      October 6, 1994


                   PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED
              (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


  New Jersey                    1-9120                      22-2625848
(State or other               (Commission                (I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction of               File Number)              Identification No.)
 incorporation) 
 

     80 Park Plaza, P. O. Box 1171 
           Newark, New Jersey                               07101-1171
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code) 
 
      Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  201-430-7000 


                    PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


 New Jersey                 1-973                           22-1212800 
(State or other          (Commission                     (I.R.S. Employer 
jurisdiction of          File Number)                    Identification No.) 
incorporation) 
 

      80 Park Plaza, P. O. Box 570 
           Newark, New Jersey                            07101-0570 
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code) 
 

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  201-430-7000 

                                       1 
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

Item 5.   Other Events.
- ------    ------------

     The following information updates certain matters previously reported
to the Securities and Exchange Commission under Item 1 - Business of Part I
of the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for 1993 and Part II of the Reports on
Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 1994 and June 30, 1994, of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) and its parent, Public
Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (Enterprise).  

Nuclear Operations
- ------------------

    Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1 (Salem 1) experienced an
automatic reactor shutdown which occurred on April 7, 1994 due to excessive
grass from the Delaware River clogging the station's water intake
structure. Subsequent to the shutdown a Precautionary Alert was declared at
1:16 p.m. and this emergency classification was terminated at 8:20 p.m.  No
abnormal releases of radiation to the environment occurred during the event
and there was no threat to the public health and safety.  Salem 1  remained
out of service while PSE&G and the NRC investigated the event and PSE&G
implemented remedial actions.  PSE&G agreed not to restart the unit until
approval was obtained from the NRC. 

    On April 7, 1994 the NRC sent an augmented inspection team (AIT) to
Salem to investigate the event.  The AIT completed its on-site
investigation on April 15, 1994 and presented its preliminary findings at a
public meeting held at the station site on April 26, 1994.  The AIT
concluded that the event had challenged the reactor coolant system pressure
boundary, that operator error had occurred which complicated the event,
that management had allowed equipment problems to exist which made
operations difficult for plant operators, and that some equipment was
degraded by the event, but overall the plant performed as designed.  The
AIT further concluded that operator use of emergency operating procedures
was good and that investigation and trouble-shooting efforts were good. 
PSE&G's investigation of the event resulted in conclusions similar to those
of the AIT.  On May 9, 1994, PSE&G and the NRC staff presented their
findings to the NRC Commissioners, and PSE&G described the actions it had
taken to prepare Salem 1 for restart.  On May 11, 1994, Senator Joseph
Biden, representing Delaware, wrote to the NRC expressing his concerns
regarding early restart of the unit and requested assurances "that all
outstanding mechanical and management problems have been resolved and that
a fine in the maximum amount will be levied upon the licensees".  The unit
returned to service on June 4, 1994.  





                                      2
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 3

Nuclear Operations (Continued)
- ------------------------------

     PSE&G has continued to address matters to improve Salem's operations
identified by itself, the NRC and the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
(INPO), an independent industry group consisting of utilities, including
PSE&G, that provides self critical analysis of nuclear operations to member
utilities.  Actions are being taken to improve the plant's materiel
condition, to upgrade procedures and to enhance personnel performance, as
well as other efforts to such end, including appointment of a new station
manager and senior plant staff.  In addition, PSE&G, effective September
29, 1994 established its nuclear operations as a separate business unit
reporting directly to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PSE&G and
hired Leon R. Eliason as its Chief Nuclear Officer and President of its new
Nuclear Business Unit.  

     On October 5, 1994, the NRC, as a result of the AIT inspection, as
well as a follow-up inspection, issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed
Imposition of Civil Penalty ("Notice") to PSE&G advising that it proposed
to impose an aggregate fine of $500,000 for violations relating to the
April 7, 1994 event, including:  the failure to identify and correct
significant conditions adverse to quality at the facility related to
spurious steam flow signals and inoperable atmospheric relief valves, both
of which, it concluded, led to unnecessary safety injections during the
event; the failure to identify and correct significant conditions adverse
to quality at the facility related to providing adequate training,
guidance, and procedures for the operators to cope with the event; and the
failure by supervisors to exercise appropriate command and control of the
operations staff and the reactor during the event.  In assessing its fine
the NRC advised PSE&G that it "expects an aggressive and prompt response to
this matter as neither PSE&G nor the NRC can accept (1) such performance in
the future, and (2) the large number of equipment related events that have
recently occurred at Salem."  The NRC has stated that, after reviewing
PSE&G's response to the Notice, including PSE&G's proposed corrective
actions and the results of future inspections, it will determine whether
further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC
regulatory requirements.  





                                        3
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 4


Nuclear Operations (Concluded)
- ------------------------------


    PSE&G's own assessments, as well as those by the NRC and INPO, indicate
that additional efforts are required to further improve operating
performance, and  PSE&G is committed to taking the necessary actions to
address Salem's performance needs.  PSE&G has indicated that the proposed
$500,000 fine will be paid without challenge.  No assurance can be given as
to what, if any, further or additional actions may be taken by NRC or what
further or additional actions may be taken by PSE&G, or required by the
NRC, to improve Salem's performance. 



Electric Levelized Energy Adjustment Clause (LEAC)
- --------------------------------------------------

     On July 1, 1994, PSE&G filed a Petition with the Board of Public
Utilities (BPU) requesting an increase its LEAC rates for the eight-month
period beginning October 1, 1994 to recover an additional $130 million of
electric energy costs.  The matter was assigned to the Office of
Administrative Law (OAL) for hearings.  Following a preliminary OAL
scheduling conference, which indicated that a final BPU decision on the
matter would not likely occur before March 1995, PSE&G filed a Motion for
Interim Relief (Motion) since such costs had increased to $170 million at
August 30, 1994 and were projected to be approximately $250 million at the
time of the scheduled final BPU decision in March 1995.  

     A significant part of the need for the increase is the larger
percentage of its power that PSE&G is obligated to purchase under prior
BPU-approved contracts with non-regulated power producers.

     The changes in the LEAC do not directly affect earnings, however,
pending recovery, PSE&G is required to finance such costs.  PSE&G cannot
predict what action that the BPU will take concerning the Motion or the 
Petition, however the BPU staff is opposing the interim relief requested. 
A decision on the Motion is expected later this month. 










                                      4<PAGE>
 <PAGE> 5
     

                                   SIGNATURE
                                   --------- 

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                              PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED
                                              (Registrant)

                                 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
                                              (Registrant) 



                          By                  R. EDWIN SELOVER
                              -------------------------------------------
                                              R. Edwin Selover
                                     Vice President and General Counsel 
                                       Public Service Enterprise Group
                                                Incorporated

                                  Senior Vice President and General Counsel
                                   Public Service Electric and Gas Company

Date:  October 6, 1994
                                                          
                                                          
                                                          
                                     5


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission