FIRST INVESTORS MULTISTATE INSURED TAX FREE FUND
485BPOS, 1997-05-15
Previous: FIDELITY LEASING INCOME FUND IV L P, 10-Q, 1997-05-15
Next: SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP INC, 10-Q, 1997-05-15




   
      As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 1997
    

                                                        Registration No. 33-4077
                                                                        811-4623
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   ----------

                                    FORM N-1A

             REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

   
                        Post-Effective Amendment No. 21                    X
                                                                           -
                                     and/or
    

               REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY
                                   ACT OF 1940

   
                               Amendment No. 21                            X
                                                                           -
    

                                   ----------

                FIRST INVESTORS MULTI-STATE INSURED TAX FREE FUND
               (Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)

                               Ms. Concetta Durso
                          Secretary and Vice President
                First Investors Multi-State Insured Tax Free Fund
                                 95 Wall Street
                            New York, New York 10005
                     (Name and Address of Agent for Service)


Approximate Date of Proposed Public Offering:  As soon as practicable  after the
effective date of this Registration Statement

   
It is proposed that this filing will become effective on May 16, 1997 pursuant
to paragraph (b) of Rule 485

Pursuant to Rule 24f-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940,  Registrant has
previously  elected to register  an  indefinite  number of shares of  beneficial
interest,  no par value,  under the Securities Act of 1933.  Registrant  filed a
Rule 24f-2  Notice for its fiscal year ending  December 31, 1996 on February 27,
1997.
    


<PAGE>

The sole purpose of this  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 21 is to  electronically
file certain  exhibits  previously  filed with the  Commission  in paper format.
Parts A and B of this  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 21 have been filed with the
Commission  on April 17, 1997 in  Registrant's  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 20
(File No. 33-4077).


<PAGE>


                                     PART C

                                OTHER INFORMATION

Item 24.  Financial Statements and Exhibits

      (a)  Financial Statements:

       Financial  Statements  are set forth in Part B,  Statement of  Additional
Information.

      (b)  Exhibits:

           (1)/2/     Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust

           (2)/2/     By-laws

           (3)        Not Applicable

           (4)        Shareholders'  rights are contained in (a) Articles III,
                      VIII, X, XI and XII of Registrant's Amended and Restated
                      Declaration  of Trust dated October 30, 1985, as amended
                      September 22, 1994, previously filed as Exhibit 99.B1 to
                      Registrant's Registration Statement and (b) Articles III
                      and  V of  Registrant's  By-laws,  previously  filed  as
                      Exhibit 99.B2 to Registrant's Registration Statement.

           (5)/2/     Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and First
                      Investors Management Company, Inc.

           (6)/2/     Underwriting Agreement between Registrant and First 
                      Investors Corporation.

           (7)        Not Applicable

           (8)a./2/   Custodian Agreement between Registrant and Irving Trust 
                      Company

              b./2/   Supplement to Custodian Agreement

   
           (9)a./2/   Administration Agreement between Registrant,  First 
                      Investors Management Company, Inc., First Investors 
                      Corporation and Administrative Data Management Corp.

              b.      Schedule A to Administration Agreement

           (10)a./1/  Opinion of Counsel
               b.     Opinion of Arizona tax counsel
               c.     Opinion of California tax counsel
               c.     Opinion of Colorado tax counsel
               d./3/  Opinion of Connecticut tax counsel
               e./3/  Opinion of Florida tax counsel
               f.     Opinion of Georgia tax counsel
               g./4/  Opinion of Maryland tax counsel
               h.     Opinion of Massachusetts tax counsel
               i.     Opinion of Michigan tax counsel
               j.     Opinion of Minnesota tax counsel
               k.     Opinion of Missouri tax counsel
               l./3/  Opinion of New Jersey tax counsel
               m.     Opinion of North Carolina tax counsel
               n.     Opinion of Ohio tax counsel
               o.     Opinion of Oregon tax counsel
               p.     Opinion of Pennsylvania tax counsel
               q.     Opinion of Virginia tax counsel

           (11)a.     Consent of independent accountants
               b./2/  Powers of Attorney
               c.     Consent of Arizona tax counsel
               d.     Consent of California tax counsel
               e.     Consent of Colorado and Georgia tax counsel
               f.     Consent of Connecticut tax counsel
               g.     Consent of Florida tax counsel
               h.     Opinion and Consent of Maryland tax counsel
               i.     Consent of Massachusetts tax counsel
               j.     Consent of Michigan tax counsel
               k.     Consent of Minnesota tax counsel
               l.     Consent of Missouri tax counsel
               m.     Consent of New Jersey tax counsel
               n.     Consent of North Carolina tax counsel
               o.     Consent of Ohio tax counsel
               p.     Consent of Oregon tax counsel
               q.     Consent of Pennsylvania tax counsel
               r.     Consent of Virginia tax counsel
    

<PAGE>

           (12)       Not applicable

   
           (13)       No undertaking in effect
    

           (14)       Not Applicable

           (15)a./2/  Amended and Restated Class A Distribution Plan

               b./2/  Class B Distribution Plan

   
           (16)/4/    Performance Calculations

           (17)       Not applicable
    

           (18)/2/    18f-3 Plan

   
- ----------
/1/     Incorporated  by reference from  Registrant's  Rule 24f-2 Notice for its
        fiscal year ending December 31, 1996 filed on February 27, 1997.
/2/     Incorporated  by  reference  from  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  19 to
        Registrant's  Registration  Statement  (File No. 33-4077) filed on April
        25, 1996.
/3/     Incorporated  by  reference  from  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  18 to
        Registrant's  Registration  Statement  (File No. 33-4077) filed on April
        25, 1996.
/4/     Incorporated  by  reference  from  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  20 to
        Registrant's  Registration  Statement  (File No. 33-4077) filed on April
        17, 1997.
    


Item 25.       Persons Controlled by or under common control with Registrant

               There are no persons  controlled by or under common  control with
the Registrant.

Item 26.       Number of Holders of Securities

   
                                                     Number of Record
                                                      Holders as of
               Title of Class                          May 2, 1997
               --------------                        ----------------

                                                Class A              Class B
               Arizona Fund                       354                  15
               California Fund                    433                   8
               Colorado Fund                      241                  13
               Connecticut Fund                   635                  63
               Florida Fund                       683                  40
               Georgia Fund                       144                  18
               Maryland Fund                      420                  33
               Massachusetts Fund                 888                  34
               Michigan Fund                     1,183                 34
               Minnesota Fund                     342                   2
               Missouri Fund                      117                   8
               North Carolina Fund                250                  13
               Ohio Fund                          810                  22
               New Jersey Fund                   1,677                 49
               Oregon Fund                        579                  26
               Pennsylvania Fund                 1,218                 45
               Virginia Fund                      853                  48
    

Item 27.  Indemnification

               Article  XI,  Section  1 of  Registrant's  Declaration  of  Trust
provides as follows:

               Section 1.

      Provided  they have  exercised  reasonable  care and have acted  under the
reasonable  belief that their actions are in the best interest of 

<PAGE>

the Trust,  the Trustees shall not be responsible for or liable in any event for
neglect or  wrongdoing  of them or any officer,  agent,  employee or  investment
adviser of the Trust,  but nothing  contained  herein shall  protect any Trustee
against  any  liability  to which he would  otherwise  be  subject  by reason of
willful  misfeasance,  bad faith,  gross negligence or reckless disregard of the
duties involved in the conduct of his office.

      Article XI,  Section 2 of  Registrant's  Declaration  of Trust provides as
follows:

               Section 2.

      (a)      Subject to the exceptions and limitations contained in Section 
(b) below:

      (i) every person who is, or has been, a Trustee or officer of the Trust (a
"Covered  Person")  shall be  indemnified  by the  Trust to the  fullest  extent
permitted by law against liability and against expenses  reasonably  incurred or
paid by him in connection with any claim,  action,  suit or proceeding  which he
becomes involved as a party or otherwise by virtue of his being or having been a
Trustee or officer and against amounts paid or incurred by him in the settlement
thereof;

      (ii) the words "claim,"  "action," "suit," or "proceeding"  shall apply to
all claims,  actions, suits or proceedings (civil,  criminal or other, including
appeals),  actual or threatened,  and the words "liability" and "expenses" shall
include, without limitation,  attorneys' fees, costs, judgments, amounts paid in
settlement, fines, penalties and other liabilities.

      (b)      No indemnification shall be provided hereunder to a Covered 
Person:

      (i) Who shall have been  adjudicated  by a court or body before  which the
proceeding  was  brought  (A) to be liable to the Trust or its  Shareholders  by
reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard
of the duties  involved in the conduct of his office or (B) not to have acted in
good faith in the reasonable  belief that his action was in the best interest of
the Trust; or

      (ii) in the event of a settlement,  unless there has been a  determination
that such Trustee or officer did not engage in willful  misfeasance,  bad faith,
gross negligence or reckless  disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of
his office,

               (A)    by the court or other body approving the settlement; or
               (B)    by at  least a  majority  or those  Trustees  who are
                      neither  interested  persons  of the  Trust  nor  are
                      parties to the matter  based upon a review of readily
                      available  facts  (as  opposed  to a full  trial-type
                      inquiry); or
               (C)    by written opinion of independent legal counsel based
                      upon a review of readily  available facts (as opposed
                      to a full  trial-type  inquiry);  provided,  however,
                      that  any  Shareholder  may,  by  appropriate   legal
                      proceedings,  challenge any such determination by the
                      Trustees, or by independent counsel.

      (c) The rights of  indemnification  herein provided may be insured against
by policies maintained by the Trust, shall be severable,  shall not be exclusive
of or affect any other  rights to which any Covered  Person may now or hereafter
be entitled,  shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be such Trustee or
officer  and  shall  inure  to  the   benefit  of  the  heirs,   executors   and
administrators  of such a person.  Nothing  contained  herein  shall  affect any
rights to  indemnification  to which Trust  personnel,  other than  Trustees and
officers,  and other persons may be entitled by contract or otherwise  under the
law.

<PAGE>

      (d) Expenses in connection  with the  preparation  and  presentation  of a
defense to any claim,  action,  suit or proceeding of the character described in
paragraph (a) of this Section 2 may be paid by the Trust from time to time prior
to final  disposition  thereof upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of
such Covered Person that such amount will be paid over by him to the Trust if it
is ultimately  determined that he is not entitled to indemnification  under this
Section 2;  provided,  however,  that either (a) such Covered  Person shall have
provided  appropriate  security for such  undertaking,  (b) the Trust is insured
against losses arising out of any such advance payments or (c) either a majority
of the Trustees who are neither  interested persons of the Trust nor are parties
to the matter,  or independent  legal counsel in a written  opinion,  shall have
determined, based upon a review of readily available facts (as opposed to a full
trial-type inquiry),  that there is a reason to believe that such Covered Person
will be found entitled to indemnification under this Section 2.

               The general effect of this  Indemnification  will be to indemnify
the officers and Trustees of the Registrant from costs and expenses arising from
any action,  suit or  proceeding  to which they may be made a party by reason of
their being or having been a Trustee or officer of the Registrant,  except where
such action is  determined  to have arisen out of the willful  misfeasance,  bad
faith,  gross  negligence  or reckless  disregard of the duties  involved in the
conduct of the Trustee's or officer's office.

      The Registrant's Investment Advisory Agreement provides as follows:

      The  Manager  shall not be liable for any error of  judgment or mistake of
law or for any loss suffered by the Company or any Series in connection with the
matters to which this Agreement  relate except a loss resulting from the willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on its part in the performance of its
duties or from reckless disregard by it of its obligations and duties under this
Agreement. Any person, even though also an officer, partner,  employee, or agent
of the Manager, who may be or become an officer, Board member, employee or agent
of the Company shall be deemed, when rendering services to the Company or acting
in any  business of the  Company,  to be  rendering  such  services to or acting
solely for the Company and not as an officer, partner, employee, or agent or one
under the control or direction of the Manager even though paid by it.

      The Registrant's Underwriting Agreement provides as follows:

      The  Underwriter  agrees to use its best efforts in effecting the sale and
public distribution of the shares of the Fund through dealers and to perform its
duties in  redeeming  and  repurchasing  the  shares of the  Fund,  but  nothing
contained in this  Agreement  shall make the  Underwriter or any of its officers
and directors or  shareholders  liable for any loss sustained by the Fund or any
of its officers, trustees, or shareholders, or by any other person on account of
any act done or  omitted  to be done by the  Underwriter  under  this  Agreement
provided that nothing herein contained shall protect the Underwriter against any
liability  to the Fund or to any of its  shareholders  to which the  Underwriter
would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross
negligence in the  performance  of its duties as Underwriter or by reason of its
reckless  disregard  of its  obligations  or duties as  Underwriter  under  this
Agreement.  Nothing in this  Agreement  shall protect the  Underwriter  from any
liabilities  which  they  may  have  under  the  Securities  Act of  1933 or the
Investment Company Act of 1940.

<PAGE>

      Insofar as  indemnification  for liabilities  arising under the Securities
Act of 1933 may be permitted to trustees,  officers or persons  controlling  the
Registrant  pursuant  to the  foregoing  provisions,  the  Registrant  has  been
informed that, in the opinion of the Securities  and Exchange  Commission,  such
indemnification  is  against  public  policy  as  expressed  in the  Act  and is
therefore unenforceable. See Item 32 herein.

Item 28.  Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser

      First Investors  Management  Company,  Inc., the  Registrant's  Investment
Adviser, also serves as Investment Adviser to:

      First Investors Cash Management Fund, Inc.
      First Investors Series Fund
      First Investors Series Fund II, Inc.
      First Investors Fund For Income, Inc.
      First Investors Government Fund, Inc.
      First Investors High Yield Fund, Inc.
      First Investors Insured Tax Exempt Fund, Inc.
      First Investors Global Fund, Inc.
      First Investors Life Series Fund
      First Investors New York Insured Tax Free Fund, Inc.
      First Investors Special Bond Fund, Inc.
      First Investors Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund, Inc.
      First Investors U.S. Government Plus Fund

      Affiliations  of the officers and directors of the Investment  Adviser are
set forth in Part B, Statement of Additional  Information,  under  "Directors or
Trustees and Officers."

Item 29.  Principal Underwriters

      (a)      First Investors Corporation, Underwriter of the Registrant, is 
also underwriter for:

               First Investors Cash Management Fund, Inc.
               First Investors Series Fund
               First Investors Series Fund II, Inc.
               First Investors Fund For Income, Inc.
               First Investors Government Fund, Inc.
               First Investors High Yield Fund, Inc.
               First Investors Insured Tax Exempt Fund, Inc.
               First Investors Global Fund, Inc.
               First Investors New York Insured Tax Free Fund, Inc.
               First Investors Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund, Inc.
               First Investors U.S. Government Plus Fund

      (b)      The following persons are the officers and directors of the 
Underwriter:

<PAGE>

                            Position and                  Position and
Name and Principal          Office with First             Office with
Business Address            Investors Corporation         Registrant
- ------------------          ---------------------         ------------

Glenn O. Head               Chairman                      President
95 Wall Street              and Director                  and Trustee
New York, NY 10005

Marvin M. Hecker            President                     None
95 Wall Street
New York, NY  10005

John T. Sullivan            Director                      Chairman of the
95 Wall Street                                            Board of Trustees
New York, NY 10005

Roger L. Grayson            Director                      Trustee
95 Wall Street
New York, NY  10005

Joseph I. Benedek           Treasurer                     Treasurer
581 Main Street
Woodbridge, NJ 07095

Robert Murphy               Comptroller                   None
581 Main Street
Woodbridge, NJ  07095

Lawrence A. Fauci           Senior Vice President         None
95 Wall Street              and Director
New York, NY 10005

Kathryn S. Head             Vice President,               Trustee
581 Main Street             Chief Financial
Woodbridge, NJ 07095        Officer and Director

Louis Rinaldi               Senior Vice                   None
581 Main Street             President
Woodbridge, NJ 07095

   
Frederick Miller            Senior Vice                   None
581 Main Street             President
Woodbridge, NJ 07095
    

Howard M. Factor            Vice President                None
95 Wall Street
New York, NY  10005

Larry R. Lavoie             Secretary and                 None
95 Wall Street              General Counsel
New York, NY  10005

Matthew Smith               Vice President                None
581 Main Street
Woodbridge, NJ 07095

Jeremiah J. Lyons           Director                      None
56 Weston Avenue
Chatham, NJ  07928

Anne Condon                 Vice President                None
581 Main Street
Woodbridge, NJ 07095

Jane W. Kruzan              Director                      None
232 Adair Street
Decatur, GA 30030

   
Elizabeth Reilly            Vice President                None
581 Main Street
Woodbridge, NJ 07095
    


               (c) Not applicable

<PAGE>

Item 30.  Location of Accounts and Records

               Physical  possession  of the books,  accounts  and records of the
Registrant  are  held  by  First  Investors  Management  Company,  Inc.  and its
affiliated  companies,  First  Investors  Corporation  and  Administrative  Data
Management Corp., at their corporate headquarters,  95 Wall Street, New York, NY
10005 and administrative offices, 581 Main Street,  Woodbridge, NJ 07095, except
for those  maintained by the  Registrant's  Custodian,  The Bank of New York, 48
Wall Street, New York, NY 10286.

Item 31.       Management Services

               Inapplicable

Item 32.       Undertakings

               The  Registrant  undertakes  to  carry  out  all  indemnification
provisions of its  Declaration  of Trust,  Advisory  Agreement and  Underwriting
Agreement in accordance with Investment Company Act Release No. 11330 (September
4, 1980) and successor releases.

               Insofar  as  indemnification  for  liability  arising  under  the
Securities  Act of 1933 may be permitted to trustees,  officers and  controlling
persons of the Registrant  pursuant to the provisions  under Item 27 herein,  or
otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  such  indemnification  is  against  public  policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim
for  indemnification  against  such  liabilities  (other than the payment by the
Registrant  of expenses  incurred or paid by a trustee,  officer or  controlling
person of the  Registrant  in the  successful  defense  of any  action,  suit or
proceeding)  is  asserted  by such  trustee,  officer or  controlling  person in
connection with the securities being registered,  the Registrant will, unless in
the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit  to a  court  of  appropriate  jurisdiction  the  question  whether  such
indemnification  by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will
be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

               The Registrant  hereby undertakes to furnish a copy of its latest
annual report to shareholders,  upon request and without charge,  to each person
to whom a prospectus is delivered.


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES


         Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Act of 1933 and the
Investment  Company Act of 1940, the Registrant  represents  that this Amendment
meets all the requirements for  effectiveness  pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the
Securities  Act of 1933,  and has duly caused this  Post-Effective  Amendment to
this  Registration  Statement  to be  signed on its  behalf by the  undersigned,
thereunto duly  authorized,  in the City of New York,  State of New York, on the
14th day of May, 1997.


                                                 FIRST INVESTORS MULTI-STATE
                                                 INSURED TAX FREE FUND
                                                 (Registrant)


                                                 By:  /s/ Glenn O. Head
                                                      -----------------
                                                      Glenn O. Head
                                                      President and Trustee

         Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Act of 1933 and the
Investment  Company Act of 1940, this Amendment to this  Registration  Statement
has been signed  below by the  following  persons in the  capacities  and on the
dates indicated.


/s/ Glenn O. Head                 Principal Executive            May 14, 1997
- -------------------------         Officer and Director
Glenn O. Head                     

/s/ Joseph I. Benedek             Principal Financial            May 14, 1997
- -------------------------         and Accounting Officer
Joseph I. Benedek                 

         *                        Director                       May 14, 1997
- -------------------------
Kathryn S. Head

         *                        Director                       May 14, 1997
- -------------------------
Roger L. Grayson

         *                        Director                       May 14, 1997
- -------------------------
Herbert Rubinstein

         *                        Director                       May 14, 1997
- -------------------------
Nancy Schaenen

         *                        Director                       May 14, 1997
- -------------------------
James M. Srygley

         *                        Director                       May 14, 1997
- -------------------------
John T. Sullivan

         *                        Director                       May 14, 1997
- -------------------------
Rex R. Reed

         *                        Director                       May 14, 1997
- -------------------------
Robert F. Wentworth


*By:     /s/ Larry R. Lavoie
         -------------------
         Larry R. Lavoie
         Attorney-in-fact

<PAGE>






                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS



Exhibit
Number                Description

99.B.9            Schedule A to Admin. Agreement
99.B10.1          Opinion of Arizona tax counsel
99.B10.2          Opinion of California tax counsel
99.B10.3          Opinion of Colorado tax counsel
99.B10.4          Opinion of Georgia tax counsel
99.B10.5          Opinion of Massachusetts tax counsel
99.B10.6          Opinion of Michigan tax counsel
99.B10.7          Opinion of Minnesota tax counsel
99.B10.8          Opinion of Missouri tax counsel
99.B10.9          Opinion of North Carolina tax counsel
99.B10.10         Opinion of Ohio tax counsel
99.B10.11         Opinion of Oregon tax counsel
99.B10.12         Opinion of Pennsylvania tax counsel
99.B10.13         Opinion of Virginia tax counsel



                            ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT

                                   SCHEDULE A

      Compensation  and charges of  Administrative  Data  Management  Corp.  for
services as Transfer Agent,  Dividend Disbursing Agent and Plan  Administration,
and for other services under the Administration Agreement.

           Opening New Account             $5.00 for each account

           Processing Payments             $0.75 for each payment*

           Processing Share Certificates   $3.00 per certificate issued

           General Account Maintenance     $0.65 per account per month

           Legal Transfers of Shares       $10.00 per transfer

           Dividend Processing             $0.45 per account per dividend
                                           declared

           Partial Withdrawals and
           Complete Liquidations           $5.00 per transaction

           Reports Required by
           Governmental Authorities        $1.00 for each account

           Exchange Fee                    $5.00 for each exchange of shares 
                                           into a Fund

           Systematic Withdrawal Plans     $1.00 for each SWP check*

OUT-OF-POCKET  EXPENSES:  In  addition  to the above  charges,  the Fund,  First
Investors  Management  Company,   Inc.  or  First  Investors  Corporation  shall
reimburse  Administrative  Data  Management  Corp. for all  out-of-pocket  costs
including but not limited to postage,  insurance, forms relating to shareholders
of the  Fund,  envelopes  and  other  similar  items,  and will  also  reimburse
Administrative  Data Management  Corp. for counsel fees,  including fees for the
preparation  of the  Administration  Agreement  and  review  of  prospectus  and
application forms.

THE ABOVE FEES AND OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES APPLY TO THE FOLLOWING FUNDS:

FIRST INVESTORS FUND FOR INCOME,  INC., FIRST INVESTORS GLOBAL FUND, INC., FIRST
INVESTORS  GOVERNMENT  FUND,  INC., FIRST INVESTORS HIGH YIELD FUND, INC., FIRST
INVESTORS INSURED TAX EXEMPT FUND, INC., FIRST INVESTORS MULTI-STATE INSURED TAX
FREE FUND, FIRST INVESTORS NEW YORK INSURED TAX FREE FUND, INC., FIRST INVESTORS
SERIES  FUND,  FIRST  INVESTORS  SERIES  FUND II,  INC.,  FIRST  INVESTORS  U.S.
GOVERNMENT PLUS FUND - 1st, 2nd & 3rd SERIES, EXECUTIVE INVESTORS TRUST

*Administrative  Data Management Corp. (ADM) bills the Fund. ADM is then paid by
the Fund, after which FIMCO reimburses the Fund.




                               The Law Offices of
        O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears
                           A Professional Association

                                  April 7, 1993


First Investors Multi-State Insured
 Tax Free Fund Arizona Series
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  We have acted as special  Arizona legal counsel to the Arizona
Series (the "Arizona  Series") of First Investors  Multi-State  Insured Tax Free
Fund (the  "Fund") in  connection  with the review of  certain  sections  of the
proposed  Prospectus (the "Prospectus") and Statement of Additional  Information
supplementing the Prospectus (the "Statement")  contained in the  Post-Effective
Amendment  No.  14 to the  Fund's  Registration  Statement  (File  No.  33-4077)
proposed  to be filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  You have
requested   our  opinion   regarding  the   taxability   under  Arizona  law  of
distributions  from the Arizona  Series that are received by Arizona  investors.
Unless  otherwise  defined in this opinion,  any  capitalized  words used herein
shall have the same meanings  assigned to such words in the  Prospectus  and the
Statement.

                  In rendering this opinion,  we have examined only the proposed
Prospectus and Statement.  In rendering the opinions set forth herein,  we have,
with  your  approval,  relied  upon  the  authenticity  and  genuineness  of the
foregoing documents and upon the following assumptions:

                  1.       The Arizona Series has operated and will continue to 
operate in the manner described in the Prospectus and Statement.

                  2. At the close of each  quarter of each  taxable  year of the
Arizona  Series,  at least 50  percent  of the  value of its total  assets  will
consist of bonds the  interest  on which is exempt  from  Arizona  state  income
taxation  under the  Arizona  Constitution  or the laws of  Arizona or under the
United States Constitution or the laws of the United States.

                  3.  During  the period  that the  Arizona  Series  seeks to be
eligible to pay Arizona  exempt-interest  dividends, it shall be classified as a
regulated investment company under Sections 851-855,  inclusive, of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

                  4. The state of  Arizona's  income  tax is  imposed on Arizona
"taxable  income"  consisting of the federal  taxable income adjusted by certain
additions  and  reduced by certain  

<PAGE>

subtractions,  including  the allowance of certain  deductions,  not relevant to
certain  opinions  stated herein.  Therefore,  in connection  with rendering the
opinions  expressed herein, we have relied on and assumed the correctness of the
descriptions  in the  Prospectus  and the  Statement  of the federal  income tax
treatment of the Arizona Series and investors in the Arizona Series.

                  You have not  requested,  and we do not  express,  an  opinion
concerning (i) any issues  relating to the federal or state tax treatment of the
Arizona  Series or its  investors  other than with respect to the Arizona  state
income tax  treatment  of the  Arizona  Series'  investors  or (ii)  whether the
Arizona  Series  has  qualified  or will  continue  to  qualify  to pay  Arizona
exempt-interest dividends.

                  Under  Arizona  law,  the  federal  adjusted  gross  income of
Arizona  taxpayers  becomes their Arizona gross income.  Arizona  taxpayers must
then add to their Arizona gross income all interest on  obligations of any state
(other than Arizona) or U.S. territory (or their political subdivisions) allowed
to be deducted in computing  federal  gross  income.  The interest  derived from
obligations  of the United  States may then be  subtracted  from  Arizona  gross
income to arrive at Arizona  adjusted  gross income.  The Arizona  Department of
Revenue has ruled that interest  derived from  obligations of the governments of
Puerto Rico,  the Virgin  Islands or Guam will also be  subtracted.  There is no
distinction  between  Arizona's tax  treatment of interest  received by a direct
investor as compared with a mutual fund investor.  The interest  retains it same
character  when  "flowed  through"  the mutual  fund and is subject to  taxation
accordingly.

                  Therefore,  in our  opinion,  distributions  from the  Arizona
Series  that  are  received  by  investors  in  the  Arizona   Series  that  are
individuals, corporations, estates and trusts subject to Arizona income taxation
will not be subject to Arizona income tax to the extent that those distributions
are  attributable  to  interest  on (i) tax exempt  obligations  of the State of
Arizona,  (ii)  obligations  of the United States and (iii)  obligations  of the
governments of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands or Guam. Other distributions from
the Arizona Series,  including those related to short-term and long-term capital
gains,  generally  will be taxable  under  Arizona law when  received by Arizona
investors.  Interest on  indebtedness  incurred  (directly and indirectly) by an
investor to purchase  or carry an interest in the Arizona  Series  should not be
deductible  for Arizona  income  purposes to the extent that the Arizona  Series
holds tax  exempt  obligations  of the State of Arizona  or  obligations  of the
United States,  Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands or Guam. It should be noted that
income  derived from interest on securities  which are merely  guaranteed by the
federal government or from repurchase agreements collateralized by United States
government obligations is not excluded and is subject to Arizona income tax.

<PAGE>

                  The  opinion  expressed  in  this  letter  is  subject  to the
assumptions,  conditions,  representations  and limitations  described above, is
limited to the laws of the state or  Arizona,  and is based upon an  analysis of
the relative Arizona statutes, court decisions, and administrative decisions and
pronouncements,  including  Ruling 84-10-5  issued by the Arizona  Department of
Revenue in 1984 and the policy  statement  issued by the Arizona  Department  of
Revenue in the March/April 1989 Arizona Taxes.

                  We have not considered, and express no opinion on the laws of,
any other  jurisdiction,  including the United States of America.  You should be
aware  that  the  foregoing   opinion  is  not  binding  on  Arizona  courts  or
administrative  agencies,  including the Arizona  Department  of Revenue,  and a
court or agency  may hold or act  contrary  to our  opinion.  In  addition,  our
opinion  represents  only  our  good-faith   evaluation  of  applicable  Arizona
statutes, administrative decisions and pronouncements,  and court decisions, any
of which could be changed or overruled at a future date with retroactive effect.
In rendering the  foregoing  opinion,  we have  reviewed only those  authorities
available  to us on the date  preceding  the date of this  letter;  we assume no
responsibility for changes in Arizona law occurring after such date.

                  This opinion is furnished by us as special  Arizona counsel to
the Fund and may not be  assigned,  used or quoted  without  our  prior  written
consent.  We hereby  consent to the filing of this  opinion as an exhibit to the
Post-Effective  Amendment No. 14 to the Fund's Registration  Statement (File No.
33-4077) and to the reference to our firm in such Registration  Statement and in
the Prospectus included therein.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson,
                                                Westover, Killinsworth &
                                                Beshears, P.A.



                   PARKER, MILLIKEN, CLARK, O'HARA & SAMUELIAN
                           A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
                                ATTORNEYS AT LAW
                        333 SOUTH HOPE STREET, 27TH FLOOR
                       LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-1488
                             TELEPHONE (213)683-6500

                                February 26, 1992



First Investors Multi-State
  Insured Tax-Free Fund
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

                     Re: California Insured Tax-Free Series

Gentlemen:

                  You have  requested  our  opinion  regarding  taxation  of the
California Insured Tax-Free Series ("California  Series") of the First Investors
Multi-State  Insured  Tax-Free Fund (the "Fund") and investors in the California
Series who are California resident individuals, estates, trusts and corporations
under the California personal income,  bank and corporation,  and state property
tax laws.

                  In  rendering  this  opinion,  we have relied  solely upon the
facts stated and representations  made in Post-Effective  Amendment Number 12 to
the Fund's  Registration  Statement to be filed on Form N-1A with respect to the
California  Series under the Securities  Act of 1933 and the Investment  Company
Act of 1940. The opinions  expressed herein represent our judgment regarding the
proper treatment of the California  Series and the  shareholders  thereof on the
basis of our analysis of the provisions of the  California  Revenue and Taxation
Code ("R&T Code"),  case law and the  regulations  and published  rulings of the
California  Franchise  Tax Board (the  "Board")  which exist as of the time this
opinion is  rendered,  all of which are subject to  prospective  or  retroactive
change.

                              FACTS AND ASSUMPTIONS
                           UPON WHICH OPINION IS BASED

                  Based  upon  such  facts  and the  representations  and  legal
conclusions  contained in the documents referred to in the preceding  paragraph,
we have  specifically  assumed  the  following  facts and legal  conclusions  in
rendering  this opinion and render no opinion with respect to the subject matter
thereof:

                  The Fund is a duly  organized  and validly  existing  business
trust under the laws of the  Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts  and has registered
with the Securities and Exchange  

<PAGE>

commission (the "Commission") as a diversified open-end management company under
the Investment company Act of 1940 (the "Act"). The investment  objective of the
California  Series is to provide  shareholders  with high current  income exempt
from federal income tax and California  personal income taxes. The term "federal
income tax" as used herein refers to the regular income tax and the  alternative
minimum tax.

                  The California  Series is properly  treated for federal income
tax purposes as an association taxable as a corporation under Section 7701(a)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "IRC"),  and that for each
of its  taxable  years,  the  California  Series  will  qualify  as a  regulated
investment company ("IRC") under Subchapter M of the IRC.

                  You have  specifically  represented  to us that  under  normal
market  conditions,  at least 80% of the value of the  assets of the  California
Series will be invested in obligations issued by the State of California and its
municipalities,   political   subdivisions   and   governmental   agencies   and
instrumentalities  the interest on which if held by  individuals  is exempt from
federal income tax and also from  California  personal  income tax  ("California
Municipal Instruments").  For federal income tax purposes, the California Series
will be eligible in each taxable year to  distribute  exempt-interest  dividends
under Section  852(b)(5) of the IRC, because at the close of each quarter of its
taxable  year, at least 50% of the value of its total assets will be invested in
obligations  the  interest  on which is exempt  from  federal  income  tax under
Section  103(a) of the IRC.  Therefore,  for federal  income tax  purposes,  the
California  Series  will  be  able  to  pass  through  to its  shareholders  the
tax-exempt  character of interest income on its holdings of California Municipal
Instruments.


Taxation of the California Series.

                  The California Bank and Corporation Tax Law (Part 11, Div. II,
of the R&T Code)  contains  provisions  largely  comparable to the provisions of
Subchapter  M of the IRC which  govern  the  taxation  of RICs.  The  California
provisions  governing  the taxation of RICs  contained in R&T Code Section 24412
differ from their federal counterparts in that:

         A. Under the IRC,  net capital  gains and  ordinary  income of RICs are
         differentiated,  and are  subject  to tax  separately  if they  are not
         distributed  as  dividends.  California  does not  compute  income from
         capital gains and ordinary income  separately nor does it characterize,
         for  purposes  of the  dividends  paid  deduction,  distributions  from
         capital gains any differently than those from ordinary income. Further,
         under  the IRC,  there is a limited  rate  above  which  net  long-term
         capital  gains  of  RICs  are  not  taxed.   California  law  does  not
         differentiate  between capital gains and ordinary 

<PAGE>

         income as to the rate of tax.

         B.  California  law  provides  for a more  limited net  operating  loss
         deduction  than under  federal  law.  Specifically  (and in addition to
         other more technical rules of limited  application),  no carrybacks are
         allowed  and   carryforwards  are  limited  to  fifty  percent  of  the
         California net operating loss.

         C. The denial of the  availability  to RICs of the  dividends  received
         deductions  under  the IRC is  modified  under the R&T Code to deny the
         comparable deductions otherwise available under California law.

         D.  California  allows to RICs a dividends  paid  deduction for amounts
         received by RICs which are exempt interest under the IRC, but which are
         included  in  the  RICs  gross  income  for  California   purposes  and
         distributed as dividends.

                  Accordingly,  based upon the  assumption  that the  California
Series is a RIC under federal law,  except as to those matters noted above,  the
California  Series  will not be subject to  California  tax on its income to the
same extent it is not subject to federal income tax.


Taxation of California Resident Individuals, Estates and Trusts

                  The California  Personal Income Tax Law,  codified as Part 10,
Div. II, of the R&T Code,  largely  incorporates by reference the IRC as amended
through January 1, 1991,  with certain  exclusions and  modifications.  Resident
individuals,  estates and trusts are subject to tax under Sections  17041(a) and
(e) on their taxable  income.  In all cases,  "taxable  income" is defined as in
Section 63 of the IRC with a few  exceptions not relevant here (R&T Code Section
17073).  Therefore,  taxable  income equals  adjusted gross income minus certain
deductions  (with certain  exceptions  noted in Section  17072).  Adjusted gross
income is in turn derived from gross income under Section 61 of the IRC.

                  R&T Code Section 17133 provides that  California  gross income
does not include  income  which the state is  prohibited  from taxing  under the
constitution  or laws of the United States of America or under the  Constitution
of the State.  Article  XIII,  Section  26(b),  of the  California  Constitution
states,  "Interest  on bonds  issued by the State or a local  government  in the
State is exempt  from  taxes on  income."  Therefore,  the  interest  on certain
California  income tax pursuant to which such  obligations  were  issued,  which
legislation  may also derive its ultimate  authority from Article XIII,  Section
26(b),  of the  Constitution.  In  both  cases,  the  exemption  applies  if the
obligations are held directly by resident individuals, estates and trusts.

<PAGE>

                  California has incorporated  provisions which have largely the
same effect as provisions  of the IRC  concerning  the taxation of  individuals,
estates and trusts on dividends of tax exempt income received from RICs,  except
as to the treatment of undistributed  capital gains of IRC Section  852(b)(3)(D)
which does not apply for California  purposes,  and the special California rules
for "exempt  interest  dividends."  R&T Code  Section  17088.  "Exempt  interest
dividends" may be paid to California  resident  individuals,  estates and trusts
without their inclusion in the taxable income of such taxpayers if they are paid
by a "management company" and certain tests are met.


                  Under  R&T  Code  Section  17145,  in order  for a  management
company (the  definition of which includes RICs qualified as such under R&T Code
Section 24412) to be eligible to pay "exempt interest dividends," at least fifty
percent  of the fair  market  value of its total  assets on the last day of each
quarter of its taxable year must be held in the form of obligations  which, when
held by an  individual,  the interest from them is exempt from  California  tax.
"Exempt interest  dividends" are dividends paid by a management company during a
taxable year,  properly  designated as such,  less certain  expenses  related to
exempt income,  and which do not exceed the interest  received by the management
company  which would be exempt from  California  tax if received by a California
resident  individual.  In order for exempt  interest  dividends  to be  properly
designated,  they must be designated as exempt interest  dividends by the paying
management company or series thereof in a written notice mailed to shareholders,
not later than sixty days after the close of the taxable year of the  management
company in which they are paid.

                  The expenses  that reduce  exempt  interest  dividends are the
expenses  relating to tax exempt income which would be  nondeductible if the RIC
were an individual,  such as interest on debts incurred to purchase or carry tax
exempt bonds,  and the amount of bond premium on tax exempt bonds which would be
nondeductible  if the RIC were an  individual.  The manner in which the expenses
are used to reduce otherwise  exempt interest  dividends is to limit the maximum
amount  of a  shareholder's  exempt  interest  dividends  to  the  shareholder's
allocable sum of 1) interest on obligations which is exempt under California law

<PAGE>

plus 2) interest on tax exempt  obligations of the United  States(1) less 3) the
amount of the expenses calculated under the preceding sentence.

                  Thus, only that portion of dividends  received by a California
individual,  trust or estate from a RIC will be exempt from California tax which
is  proportionate  to the  percentage  of  interest  received  by the  RIC  from
obligations  which are themselves exempt from California tax (Appeal of Smith, 5
SBE 42 (SBE,  October 9, 1991)).  Further,  only that portion of those dividends
will be exempt which is the same proportion as the designated dividends less the
nondeductible expenses, divided by the amount of the designated dividends.

                  Based upon the assumption that the California  Series is a RIC
under the IRC and the  further  assumption  that more than fifty  percent of its
assets at the end of each  quarter will be in the form of  California  Municipal
Instruments,  distributions,  less allocable nondeductible expenses as discussed
above, made by the California Series to individuals, estates and trusts resident
in California will be exempt from  California  Personal Income Tax to the extent
the  distributions are properly  designated as "exempt interest  dividends," and
are derived from California  Municipal  Instruments or instruments of the United
States  which would be exempt from the  California  Personal  Income Tax if such
instruments were held directly by an individual.

                  Capital  gain  dividends  and  other  dividends  derived  from
sources  other  than  those  referred  to in the  preceding  sentence  which are
distributed by the California  Series will be fully includable in the California
taxable income of such individuals, estates and trusts.

- ---------------------
         (1) There is  apparently  a  technical  error in the  drafting  of 1990
amendments  to  R&T  Code  Section  17145(b)  that  seemingly  limits,   through
application  of this formula,  the  exclusion  from  California  tax (apart from
interest  directly  exempt under the laws or Constitution of California) of only
federally tax-exempt interest of direct obligations of the United States and not
interest which is otherwise  exempt under federal law of  obligations  issued by
United  States  Possessions  (such as  Guam,  Puerto  Rico  and the U.S.  Virgin
Islands).  The remainder of the 1990 amendments  appear intended to exclude from
California tax interest on obligations of U.S Possessions otherwise exempt under
federal law.  Given the lack of official  authority,  however,  we are unable to
opine  that  exempt  interest   dividends  derived  from  otherwise   tax-exempt
obligations  of  United  States  Possessions  would be  exempt  from  California
Personal Income Tax.

<PAGE>

Taxation of California Corporations

                  The California  Bank and  Corporation Tax Law imposes taxes on
various classes of corporations,  all of which taxes are measured by net income.
The franchise tax is imposed by Section 23151 on all corporations doing business
in  California  and by  Section  23181 on all banks and  financial  corporations
located in California. The corporation income tax is imposed by Section 23501 on
corporations  which derive income from California sources but are not engaged in
business in California.

                  For purposes of the franchise tax, Section 24272 provides that
"gross income" includes all interest received from federal,  state, municipal or
other bonds.  Therefore,  even if  California  Municipal  Instruments  were held
directly by corporations subject to such tax, interest on such obligations would
nevertheless  be taxable to them.  For purposes of the  corporation  income tax,
Article  XIII,  Section  26(b),  of the  California  Constitution  would require
exclusion of interest on such  obligations from gross income if such obligations
were held directly by the corporation.

                  The California  Bank and Corporation Tax Law has no provisions
comparable  to  Sections  852(b)(3)  and (5) of the  Code  permitting  regulated
investment  companies to pass  through to their  shareholders  the  character of
their tax-free income and their capital gains. Therefore, all distributions made
by the  California  Series to  corporations  which  are  subject  to either  the
California  franchise tax or the California corporate income tax will be taxable
as ordinary income to such corporations.

Property Taxes

                  Section 212 of the  Revenue and  Taxation  Code  exempts  from
California property taxes "notes,  debentures,  shares of capital stock, solvent
credits, bonds, deeds of trust,  mortgages,  and any interest in such property."
We believe  that  shares of a  regulated  investment  company  which  invests in
Municipal  Instruments would be regarded as representing shares of capital stock
or an  interest  in bonds  held by the  shareholders.  Therefore,  shares of the
California Series will be exempt from California property taxes.

                  On the basis of the foregoing, it is our opinion that

         (1)      so long as the Fund  qualifies as a RIC under IRC Section 851,
                  the  California  Series will be subject to taxation  under the
                  California  Bank  and  Corporation  Tax Law  only to the  same
                  extent it is subject to tax under IRC Sections 851 through 855
                  and 860, except with respect to  undistributed  capital gains,
                  net operating loss carryforwards and carrybacks,  the dividend
                  received deductions and the dividends paid deduction;

<PAGE>

         (2)      if the Fund  qualifies  as a RIC,  and the  California  Series
                  operates so that at least 50% of the value of its total assets
                  is  invested  in  California   Municipal   Instruments  and/or
                  instruments of the United States exempt from  California  tax,
                  interest  distributions,  less allocable expenses, made by the
                  California   Series  to  shareholders   which  are  California
                  resident  individuals,  estates and trusts,  not exceeding the
                  interest  received  by the  California  Series  on  California
                  Municipal Instruments or on direct Federal obligations,  which
                  would  be  exempt  from  California  Personal  Income  Tax  if
                  received  by  an  individual,   and  which  distributions  are
                  properly   designated  by  the  Series  as  "exempt   interest
                  dividends,"  will  not be  includable  in the  income  of such
                  shareholders  for purposes of the California  Personal  Income
                  Tax. Capital gain  distributions and distributions  other than
                  "exempt interest dividends" made by the California Series will
                  be  taxable  to  such  shareholders  as  ordinary  income  and
                  potentially subject to the California alternative minimum tax;

         (3)      distributions  made  by the  California  Series  to  corporate
                  shareholders  subject to tax in California  will be subject to
                  the California franchise or corporate income taxes and will be
                  treated as ordinary income; and

         (4)      shares of the California Series will not be subject to the 
                  California property tax in the hands of the holders thereof.

                  We hereby  consent  to the  inclusion  of this  opinion  as an
Exhibit to  Post-Effective  Amendment  Number 12 to the  Registration  Statement
filed  on  behalf  of the Fund  with the  Commission  and the  applications  and
registration  statements  filed in accordance  with the  securities  laws of the
several states in which shares of the Fund are to be offered. We further consent
to the  references in the  Prospectus to our firm and the fact that this opinion
has been rendered.

                                          Very truly yours,

                          /s/Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian

                             Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian,
                                       A Professional Corporation




                                   KUTAK ROCK
                                  A PARTNERSHIP
                       INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
                                 2400 ARCO TOWER
                             707 SEVENTEENTH STREET

                           DENVER, COLORADO 80202-3424

                                February 15, 1992

First Investors Multi-State Insured
         Tax Free Fund - Colorado Series
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005-4297

         Re:  Certain Colorado Income Tax Matters

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as your  special tax counsel in  connection  with certain
matters  regarding  the First  Investors  Colorado  Insured Tax Free Series (the
"Fund"), a separate designated series of First Investors Multi-State Insured Tax
Free Fund.  Specifically,  you have asked us to  consider  the  characterization
under  the  laws of the  State  of  Colorado  of  certain  interest  income  and
anticipated  gain to be derived by the Fund.  The  opinions  set forth below are
based upon a review of the  provisions  of the  Colorado  Income Tax Act of 1987
(the "Act") and interpretations  thereof,  and the assumption that the Fund will
be  operated  in a manner  substantially  identical  to that  described  in that
certain  Prospectus  contained  in  Post-Effective   Amendment  No.  12  to  the
Registration  Statement  filed on  behalf  of the Fund  with the  United  States
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), which will be used in connection
with the offer and sale of interests in the Fund.

         We are of the opinion that dividend distributions from the Fund, to the
extent  attributable  to interest on obligations  exempt from federal income tax
under the provisions of Section 103 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended,  (the  "Code")  issued  by the  State  of  Colorado  or  any  political
subdivision thereof on or after May 1, 1980 may be excluded from the calculation
of income for  purposes of the Act by  individuals,  estates and trusts.  We are
further of the  opinion  that such  individuals,  estates and trusts may exclude
from the calculation of Colorado income tax dividend distributions from the Fund
to the extent  attributable to interest on obligations of the United States,  or
its  possessions.  We are, in addition,  of the opinion  that such  individuals,
estates and trusts,  will not be  entitled to exclude  from income any  dividend
distributions  from the Fund which are  attributable  to  interest  exempt  from
federal  income  tax  under  Section  103(a)  of the  Code and  attributable  to
obligations  

<PAGE>

issued by any other state or political subdivision thereof.  Moreover, it is our
opinion  that  individuals,  estates  and trusts will not be entitled to exclude
from income any net  short-term or long-term  capital gain  attributable  to the
sale of shares in the Fund or any capital gain dividend received from the Fund.

         Further,  it is our opinion  that  corporations  may  exclude  dividend
distributions  from the Fund which are  attributable  to interest  income exempt
from federal income tax under Section 103(a) of the Code from the calculation of
Colorado  income tax to the extent  attributable  to  obligations  issued by the
State of Colorado or any political  subdivision  thereof.  We are further of the
opinion that  corporations  may exclude from the  calculation of Colorado income
tax, dividend distributions from the Fund to the extent attributable to interest
on obligations of the United States or its possessions.  We are, in addition, of
the opinion  that  corporations  will not be entitled to exclude from income any
dividend  distributions  from the Fund which are attributable to interest exempt
from federal  income tax under Section  103(a) of the Code and  attributable  to
obligations  issued  by  any  other  state  or  political  subdivision  thereof.
Moreover,  it is our opinion that  corporations  will not be entitled to exclude
from income any net  short-term or long-term  capital gain  attributable  to the
sale of shares in the Fund or any capital gain dividend received from the Fund.

         Please note that this opinion is based upon the  provisions  of the Act
in  effect  as of the  date  hereof.  Subsequent  changes  in the  Act or in the
interpretations  thereof could preclude us from  rendering a similar  opinion in
the  future.  This  opinion is  intended  solely for your  benefit  and does not
constitute  personal tax advice to any investor in the Fund.  Moreover,  we have
rendered no opinion regarding the Fund, except as described herein.

         We hereby  consent to the  inclusion  of this  opinion as an Exhibit to
Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to the Registration Statement filed on behalf of
the Fund with the SEC (the  "Registration  Statement"),  and to the applications
and registration  statements filed in accordance with the securities laws of the
several states in which shares of the Fund are to be offered. We further consent
to the references in the Prospectus  accompanying the Registration  Statement to
our firm and the fact that this opinion has been rendered.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Kutak Rock

                                                Kutak Rock



                                   KUTAK ROCK
                                  A PARTNERSHIP
                       INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
                          4400 GEORGIA - PACIFIC CENTER
                           133 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.

                           ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1808


                                February 14, 1992



First Investors Multi-State Insured
         Tax Free Fund - Georgia Series
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005-4297

         Re:  Certain Georgia Income Tax Matters

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as your  special tax counsel in  connection  with certain
matters  regarding  the First  Investors  Georgia  Insured  Tax Free Series (the
"Fund"), a separate designated series of First Investors Multi-State Insured Tax
Free Fund.  Specifically,  you have asked us to  consider  the  characterization
under  the  laws  of the  State  of  Georgia  of  certain  interest  income  and
anticipated  gain to be derived by the Fund.  The opinions of the Georgia Public
Revenue Code (the "Act") and  interpretations  thereof,  and the assumption that
the Fund will be operated in a manner substantially  identical to that described
in that certain Prospectus  contained in Post-Effective  Amendment No. 12 to the
Registration  Statement  filed on  behalf  of the Fund  with the  United  States
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), which will be used in connection
with the offer and sale of interests in the Fund.

         We are of the opinion that dividend distributions from the Fund, to the
extent  attributable  to interest on obligations  exempt from federal income tax
under the provisions of Section 103 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended,  (the  "Code")  issued  by  the  State  of  Georgia  or  any  political
subdivision  thereof may be excluded from the calculation of income for purposes
of the Act by  individuals,  estates and  trusts.  We are further of the opinion
that such  individuals,  estates and trusts may exclude from the  calculation of
Georgia  income  tax  dividend   distributions  from  the  Fund  to  the  extent
arrtibutable to interest on obligations of the United States, its territories or
possessions or of any  authority,  commission or  instrumentality  of the United
States exempt from state income tax under  federal law. We are, in addition,  of
the opinion that such individuals,  estates and trusts,  will not be entitled to
exclude  from  income  any  dividend  distributions  from  the  Fund  which  are

<PAGE>

attributable  to interest exempt from federal income tax under Section 103(a) of
the Code and attributable to obligations  issued by any other state or political
subdivision thereof.  Moreover, it is our opinion that individuals,  estates and
trusts  will not be  entitled  to  exclude  from  income any net  short-term  or
long-term  capital  gain  attributable  to the sale of shares in the Fund or any
capital gain dividend received from the Fund.

         Although the application of the Georgia  intangible  personal  property
tax to the  ownership of shares in the Georgia  Series is not clear,  we believe
that  shares in the  Georgia  Series  will be deemed  to be  taxable  intangible
property  separate  from an  ownership  interest  in the  underlying  tax-exempt
Georgia  bonds.  Further,  we  believe  that the Fund will not be subject to the
Georgia intangible  personal property tax as a result of holding  obligations or
evidences of debt of Georgia, its political subdivisions and public institutions
because such obligations or evidences of debt are exempt from such tax.

         Further,  it is our opinion  that  corporations  may  exclude  dividend
distributions  from the Fund which are  attributable  to interest  income exempt
from federal income tax under Section 103(a) of the Code from the calculation of
Georgia income tax to the extent attributable to obligations issued by the State
of Georgia or any political  subdivision  thereof. We are further of the opinion
that  corporations  may  exclude  from the  calculation  of Georgia  income tax,
dividend  distributions from the Fund to the extent  attributable to interest on
obligations  of the United  States,  its  territories  or  possessions or of any
authority,  commission or instrumentality of the United States exempt from state
income  tax  under  federal  law.  We are,  in  addition,  of the  opinion  that
corporations   will  not  be  entitled  to  exclude  from  income  any  dividend
distributions  from the Fund which are  attributable  to  interest  exempt  from
federal  income  tax  under  Section  103(a)  of the  Code and  attributable  to
obligations  issued  by  any  other  state  or  political  subdivision  thereof.
Moreover,  it is our opinion that  corporations  will not be entitled to exclude
from income any net  short-term or long-term  capital gain  attributable  to the
sale of shares in the Fund or any capital gain dividend received from the Fund.

         Please note that this opinion is based upon the  provisions  of the Act
in  effect  as of the  date  hereof.  Subsequent  changes  in the  Act or in the
interpretations  thereof could preclude us from  rendering a similar  opinion in
the  future.  This  opinion is  intended  solely for your  benefit  and does not
constitute  personal tax advice to any investor in the Fund.  Moreover,  we have
rendered no opinion regarding the Fund, except as described herein.

         We hereby  consent to the  inclusion  of this  opinion as an Exhibit to
Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to the Registration Statement filed on behalf of
the Fund with the SEC (the  "Registration  Statement"),  and to the applications
and 

<PAGE>

registration  statements  filed in accordance  with the  securities  laws of the
several states in which shares of the Fund are to be offered. We further consent
to the references in the Prospectus  accompanying the Registration  Statement to
our firm and the fact that this opinion has been rendered.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Kutak Rock

                                                Kutak Rock


                                 PALMER & DODGE

                                One Beacon Street
                           Boston, Massachusetts 02108

                                 April 14, 1993

First Investors Multi-State Insured Tax Free Fund
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

Gentlemen:

         We have acted as special  Massachusetts tax counsel to you to determine
the  Massachusetts  personal income tax consequences of receipt of distributions
from  the  Massachusetts  Series  (the  "Massachusetts  Series")  of  the  First
Investors  Multi-State Insured Tax Free (the "Fund") by holders of shares of the
Massachusetts Series.

         In rendering this opinion, we have relied on your  representations that
the Fund is a corporate  trust within the meaning of chapter 62, section 1(j) of
Massachusetts  General laws and that the Massachusetts Series qualifies and will
continue  to qualify  as a  separate  regulated  investment  company  within the
meaning of section 851 of the  Internal  Revenue  Code of 1986,  as amended (the
"Code").

         Based on your  representations and our examination of relevant laws, we
are  of  the  opinion  that  under   existing  law  holders  of  shares  of  the
Massachusetts  Series who are subject to income  taxation under Mass. G.L. c. 62
will not be subject to tax on distributions  from the  Massachusetts  Series for
periods  during  which  the  Massachusetts   Series  qualifies  as  a  regulated
investment  company  under  section  851 of the Code,  to the extent  that these
distributions (1) qualify as exempt interest dividends of a regulated investment
company  within  the  meaning  of Code  section  852(b)(5)  which  are  directly
attributable to interest exempt from Massachusetts  taxation under any provision
of  law,  on  obligations  issued  by the  Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts,  its
instrumentalities  or its political  subdivisions,  by the  government of Puerto
Rico or by its authority,  by the government of Guam or by its authority,  or by
the government of the Virgin Islands or by its authority;  (2) are  attributable
to  interest  on  obligations  of the United  States  exempt  from state  income
taxation;  or (3) qualify as capital gain  dividends  within the meaning of code
section  852(b)(3)(C)  which are attributable to gain exempt from  Massachusetts
taxation under any provision of law, on obligations  issued by the  Commonwealth
of  Massachusetts,   its  instrumentalities  or  political   subdivisions.   The
Massachusetts  Series  must  identify  the items not subject to tax in a written
notice to the shareholders.  Holders of shares of 

<PAGE>

the Massachusetts  Series who are subject to income taxation under Mass. G.L. c.
62 will  generally  be subject to tax on  distributions  which are from  sources
other than those described above.

         The  material  set  forth  under  the  caption   "State  income  taxes.
Massachusetts"  in the prospectus is a fair summary of this opinion.  We consent
to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No.14 to
the Fund's Registration Statement on Form N-1A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended,  and to the  reference to us under the heading  "State income taxes.
Massachusetts".

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/Palmer & Dodge



                  DICKINSON, WRIGHT, MOON, VAN DUSEN & FREEMAN
                               COUNSELLORS AT LAW
                            25 NORTH WOODWARD AVENUE
                                  P.O. BOX 509
                      BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MICHIGAN 48303-0509


                                  April 1, 1993



First Investors Multi-State
  Insured Tax Free Fund
95 Wall Street
New York, New York, 10005

               Re: First Investors Tax Free Fund - Michigan Series

Ladies/Gentlemen:

                  We  have  acted  as  special  Michigan  counsel  to the  First
Investors  Multi-State Insured Tax Free Fund (the "Fund") and you have requested
our opinion with respect to certain  Michigan tax consequences of investments in
the Michigan Series shares of the Fund. We understand that you are preparing the
Post-Effective  Amendment No. 14 to the Registration  Statement on Form N-1A for
filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange   Commission   (the   "Registration
Statement")  with respect to the Fund.  We have  examined the text of the Fund's
most  recent  Prospectus  and  statement  of  additional  information  and  have
particularly  reviewed the portions of such documents relating to Michigan taxes
and the risk factors affecting the Michigan Series.

                  The  Fund  is a  diversified  open-end  management  investment
company  satisfying the  requirements for  qualification  for federal income tax
purposes as a regulated  investment  company under Part I of Subchapter M of the
Internal  Revenue Code of 1986,  as amended  (the  "Code").  The Fund  currently
consists of 12 separate  series,  one of which is the  Michigan  tax free series
(the "Michigan Series").

                  All of the Fund's  assets (other than  temporary  investments)
will consist of federally  tax-exempt  obligations  under Section  103(a) of the
Code and as a  consequence,  the Fund's  dividends  will be exempt from  federal
income tax under Section 852(b)(5)(B) of the Code.

                  The Michigan Series will invest primarily in  interest-bearing
obligations  issued  by or  on  behalf  of  the  State  of  Michigan,  political
subdivisions  thereof and  agencies  and  instrumentalities  of the state or its
political  subdivisions.  It may also  invest  in  interest-bearing  obligations
issued by or on behalf of  governments  the  securities  of which bear  interest
exempt from federal taxes and Michigan  income tax, such as the  

<PAGE>

governments of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam and their authorities or
municipalities.  We also understand that in certain circumstances,  the Michigan
Series may invest up to 20% of the value of its net assets in  instruments,  the
interest on which is exempt from federal income taxes but not Michigan state and
local income taxes. Furthermore, we understand that the Michigan Series may also
invest  from  time  to  time on a  temporary  basis  in  obligations  issued  or
guaranteed  by  the  United  States  and  its  agencies,   instrumentalities  or
authorities and corporate debt securities,  commercial paper and certificates of
deposit.

                  The investments of the Michigan  Series,  except any temporary
taxable investments,  are insured as to payment of principal and interest by the
issuer or under an insurance policy written by an independent insurance company.

                  The Michigan  Series will notify its  shareholders  by mail by
January  31  after  the  close  of the  calendar  year as to the tax  status  of
distributions made during the calendar year.

                  Based  upon  the  foregoing  and upon an  examination  of such
documents  and an  investigation  of such other matters of law as we have deemed
necessary,  we are  of  the  opinion  that  under  existing  law  applicable  to
shareholders of the Michigan Series:

                  1.  Shareholders  of the  Michigan  Series who are  subject to
Michigan  income  tax or  Michigan  single  business  tax will not be subject to
Michigan income tax or Michigan single business tax on Michigan Series dividends
to the extent that the distributions  qualify as exempt-interest  dividends of a
regulated  investment  company  under  Section  852(b)(5)  of the Code which are
attributable to interest on tax-exempt  obligations of the State of Michigan, or
its  political  or  governmental  subdivisions,  its  governmental  agencies  or
instrumentalities  (as well as certain other federally  tax-exempt  obligations,
the interest on which is exempt from Michigan tax, such as, for example, certain
obligations of Puerto Rico).  If, however,  distributions to shareholders of the
Michigan  Series are derived  from  sources  other than those  described  above,
including  long or short-term  capital  gains,  such  distributions  will not be
exempt from Michigan income tax or Michigan single business tax.

                  2. In late 1986, the Michigan Department of Treasury issued an
administrative  bulletin which  announced that holders of interests in regulated
investment  companies  who are subject to the Michigan  intangibles  tax will be
exempt from the  intangibles  tax to the extent that the  companies'  investment
portfolios  consist of United States obligations and obligations of the State of
Michigan or its  political  subdivisions.  In addition,  Michigan  Series shares
owned by certain  financial  institutions or by certain other persons subject to
the Michigan single business tax are exempt from the Michigan intangibles tax by
reason of the owners being subject to the single business tax.

<PAGE>

                  3. As respects a Michigan Series shareholder who is subject to
the  Michigan  single  business  tax (i.e.,  engages in  "business  activity" as
defined in the Michigan  single  business tax act),  the occurrence of a taxable
event for such  shareholder  for federal  income tax purposes  when the Michigan
Series  sells or exchanges  obligations  or the  shareholder  sells or exchanges
shares will affect the adjusted  tax base upon which the single  business tax is
computed.  Any capital gain or loss  realized  from such taxable event which was
includable in the computation of the shareholder's  federal taxable income, plus
the portion, if any, of such capital gain excluded in such computation and minus
the portion,  if any, of the capital loss not deducted in such  computation  for
the year the loss  occurred,  will be included  in the  adjusted  tax base.  The
adjusted tax base of any person other than a corporation is affected by any gain
or loss  realized  from the taxable  event only to the effect that the resulting
federal taxable income is derived from "business activity."

                  4. Under Michigan's  uniform city income tax ordinance,  which
authorizes  the only  income  tax  ordinance  which may be  adopted by cities in
Michigan,  distributions  from the  Michigan  Series  which are not  subject  to
Michigan  income tax will similarly not be subject to the Michigan  uniform city
income tax.

                  We hereby  consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to the  referenced  Registration  Statement  and to the reference to our Firm as
special  Michigan  counsel  in the  Registration  Statement  and in the  related
Prospectus.

                                             Very truly yours,

                              /s/ DICKINSON, WRIGHT, MOON, VAN DUSEN & FREEMAN

                                  DICKINSON, WRIGHT, MOON, VAN DUSEN & FREEMAN




                                 FAEGRE & BENSON
                              2300 Multifoods Tower
                              33 South Sixth Street
                        Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3694

                                 (612) 371-5300


                                November 17, 1986

First Investors Multi-State Insured
  Tax Free Fund
120 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

Gentlemen:

         We are Minnesota tax counsel to First Investors Multi-State Insured Tax
Free Fund, a trust created under the laws of the State of  Massachusetts  and of
the type commonly known as a Massachusetts business trust (the "Trust"). We have
been  informed  that the Trust  intends  to qualify  as a  regulated  investment
company as that term is defined  and  limited  in  section  851 of the  Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the  "Code"),  and that it intends to take all
other action to ensure that the Trust may pay exempt-interest  dividends as that
term is defined in section in section  852(b)(5)(A)  of the Code.  We understand
that it is the Trust's  intention to sell  separate  classes of shares,  as more
fully described below, each generally to residents of specified states,  for the
purpose of enabling such residents to receive exempt-interest dividends that are
exempt from the regular  federal  income tax as well as from the regular  income
tax imposed by the state of residence of the recipient shareholder.

         You have asked our opinion of the Minnesota  income tax consequences of
the receipt by a holder of shares of the  Minnesota  Insured  Tax-Free  Class of
Shares (the "Minnesota  Class of Shares") of  exempt-interest  dividends as that
term is  defined  in  section  852(b)(5)(A)  of the Code that are  payable  with
respect to the  Minnesota  Class of Shares that are proposed to be issued by the
Trust. In responding to your inquiry,  we have reviewed the Amended and Restated
Declaration  of Trust of the Trust,  (Declaration  made  October 30,  1985,  and
amended September 30, 1986, and October 30, 1986 (the  "Articles"),  and certain
other  materials  that you have  supplied to us. In addition,  we have  reviewed
certain of the laws of the State of  Minnesota,  and certain  provisions  of the
Code.

         The Trust provides,  in general, that it shall issue various classes of
shares, and that a "share" means the equal  proportionate units of interest into
which the  beneficial  interest  of each  class of shares in the Trust  shall be
divided.  (Article I, Section 2(f), of the  Articles).  As stated in Article IV,
section  8, of the  Articles,  each  shareholder  of a  class  of  shares  has a
proportionate  

<PAGE>

undivided  beneficial  interest in the assets belonging to such class of shares,
and  all  consideration  received  by the  Trust  from  the  issue  or sale of a
particular class of shares, together with all assets in which such consideration
is invested,  as well as all income,  earnings and proceeds  thereof,  including
proceeds from the sale thereof, shall irrevocably belong to that class of shares
for all  purposes,  subject  only to the  rights of  creditors  of that class of
shares, and shall be so recorded on the books of the Trust. General items, which
are those that are not readily  identifiable a belonging to any particular class
of shares,  shall be allocated  among the various  classes of shares in a manner
which the Board of Trustees  deems fair and  equitable,  and those items,  along
with the ones previously referred to, are deemed to be the assets belonging to a
particular class.

         Article  IV,  Section  9, of the  Articles  provides  that  the  assets
belonging to each particular  class shall be charged with the liabilities of the
Trust in  respect of that  class,  and with all  expenses,  costs,  charges  and
reserves attributable to that class, all of which shall be recorded on the books
of the Trust. In addition, it is provided that general items of liability, cost,
expense,  charge, or reserve, which are not readily identifiable as belonging to
any  particular  class of shares,  will be allocated by the Board of trustees to
the various classes in a fair and equitable manner.

         With  respect to  distributions,  Article X, section 1, of the Articles
provides that dividends and distributions to the holders of a class of shares of
the Trust may be paid only from the  income and gains and  assets  belonging  to
that class of shares, after providing for liabilities belonging to that class of
shares.  Article X,  section 2, of the Articles  provides  that in the case of a
redemption  of shares,  a  shareholder  of a  particular  class of shares  shall
receive  the net asset  value of such  shares  (which is  defined  in Article X,
section 3, of the  Articles as the assets  belonging  to a  particular  class of
shares less the liabilities  belonging thereto),  and reiterates that the rights
of a  shareholder  of a particular  class is limited in redemption to the assets
belonging to that particular of shares, less the liabilities  belonging thereto.
In the case of a  termination  of the  Trust,  or any class of  shares  thereof,
Article XII,  section 4, of the Articles  provides  that after  disposing of the
assets of the Trust or the assets  belonging to any affected  class of shares of
the Trust,  and upon  making  provisions  for the payment of  assumption  of all
outstanding obligations, the Trustees of the Trust will distribute the remaining
proceeds or assets ratably among the holders of the shares of any affected class
of shares then outstanding.

         Article VIII, section 1, of the Articles provides, in general, that the
shareholders  shall be entitled to vote on various  occasions,  including  those
that are authorized by the Articles,  the By-Laws,  or by virtue of any law, and
further provides that on any matter submitted to a vote of the shareholders, all
shares shall be 

<PAGE>

voted by each class of shares,  except that (i) when required by the  Investment
Company  Act of 1940,  shares  shall be voted in the  aggregate  and not by each
particular  class of shares,  and (ii) when the Trustees have  determined that a
matter  affects only the  interests of one or more classes of shares,  than only
the shareholders of such classes of shares will be entitled to vote thereon.  We
have noted that certain other provisions that are contained in other articles of
the Articles  and in the By-Laws  refer to a majority  shareholder  vote without
reference to a separate vote by classes of shares.  You have stated,  and we are
relying upon such statement,  that the legal effect of any of such provisions is
limited  by, and  subject  to, the  provisions  discussed  above that  appear in
Article VIII, section 1, of the Articles.

         In the case of  meetings,  Article  VIII,  section  2, of the  Articles
provides that a special  meeting of the  shareholders of any class of shares may
be called by the holders of  one-tenth  of the  outstanding  shares of the class
entitled  to vote.  With  respect to quorums,  it is  provided in Article  VIII,
section 3, of the  Articles  that a majority of shares of the Trust  outstanding
and entitled to vote shall  constitute a quorum,  except that where the Articles
or any  provision  of law permit or require  that holders of any class of shares
shall vote as a class, then a majority of the aggregate number of shares of that
class  entitled  to vote  shall be  necessary  to  constitute  a quorum  for the
transaction  of business by that class of shares.  In the case of  amendments to
the Articles, it is provided in Article XII, section 7, of the Articles,  that a
vote of a majority of the shares of the Trust is generally required, except that
where an amendment  affects that  shareholders of one or more classes of shares,
but not the  shareholders  of all outstanding  classes of shares,  the amendment
shall be  authorized  by a vote of the  shareholders  holding a majority  of the
shares entitled to vote of each class affected,  and not vote of shareholders of
a class of shares not affect shall be required.

         Other provisions of the Articles deal with rights to indemnity. Article
XI, section 2, of the Articles provides that a Trustee may be indemnified by the
appropriate class of shares of the Trust, and that expenses of a trustee related
to such  indemnity may be paid by the  appropriate  class of shares.  Similarly,
Article XI,  section 3, of the Articles  provides that if a shareholder  is held
liable  solely by reason of his being or having  been a  shareholder,  he may be
entitled to be indemnified out of the assets belonging to the appropriate  class
of shares.  With  respect to  reimbursement  of Trustee  expenses,  Article  VI,
section 1, of the Articles  provides that a Trustee shall be reimbursed from the
assets belonging to the appropriate class of shares.

         As described above, it is the intention of the Trust that each class be
treated separately from the others, and that the income,  gains, and losses that
relate to a particular class of shares be allocated to that class alone. We have
been  informed  that the  Trusts  will  attempt to invest the bulk of the assets
belonging to the  Minnesota  Class of Shares in any  combination  of  tax-exempt

<PAGE>

obligations   of  the  State  of  Minnesota,   its  political  or   governmental
subdivisions,   its   municipalities,   and   its   governmental   agencies   of
instrumentalities,  so as to generate as large a percentage of tax-exempt income
a is possible.  Accordingly,  except during defensive periods or when acceptable
investments  are  unavailable  to the  Minnesota  Class  of  Shares,  the  Trust
anticipates  that it will maintain at least 80% of its assets  belonging to that
class in debt  obligations  which are exempt from the regular Federal income tax
and,  in the case of  non-corporate  shareholders,  are exempt  from the regular
Minnesota income tax.

         As  indicated  above,  we have been told that,  for federal  income tax
purposes,   the  Trust   intends  to  qualify  so  as  to  be  eligible  to  pay
exempt-interest  dividends,  as defined in section  852(b)(5)(A) of the Code, to
its  shareholders,  and that pursuant to section  852(b)(5)(B) of the Code, such
exempt-interest  dividends  shall be treated by the  shareholders  as an item of
interest that is excludable  from gross income under section 103(a) of the Code.
Accordingly,  we have been informed that, to the extent that a  distribution  to
the non-corporate  shareholders of the Minnesota Class of Shares  constitutes an
exempt-interest  dividend, such shareholders will not pay regular federal income
tax with  respect to such  amounts,  and such  amounts will not be part of their
federal adjusted gross income or regular federal taxable income.

         For Minnesota income tax purposes,  it is provided in Minn. Stat.  
ss.290.01,  subd, 20, that in the case of individuals,  estates and trusts,  the
starting point for the computation of Minnesota  taxable income is gross income,
and gross income is defined as federal adjusted gross income, subject to various
modifications.  Pursuant to paragraph (4) of Minn. Stat. ss.290.01, subd. 20(a),
it is further  provided  that the following  shall be added to federal  adjusted
gross income:

         "Exempt-interest  dividends,  as defined in section 852(b)(5)(A) of the
         internal  Revenue Code of 1954, not included in federal  adjusted gross
         income pursuant to section 852(b)(5)(B) of the internal revenue code of
         954, except for that portion of exempt-interest  dividends derived from
         interest  income on obligations  of the State of Minnesota,  any of its
         political or governmental subdivisions,  any of its municipalities,  or
         any of its governmental agencies or instrumentalities;.."

Accordingly,  to the  extent  that the  exempt-interest  dividends  for  federal
purposes are  "derived"  from  interest  income on  obligations  of the State of
Minnesota  and  its  specified   subdivisions,   municipalities,   agencies  and
instrumentalities,  the  exempt-interest  dividends will likewise be exempt from
the regular Minnesota income tax, and only those exempt-interest dividends which
are derived from other  sources will be added to federal  adjusted  gross income
and subjected to the regular  Minnesota  income tax, in the case of individuals,
estates,  and trusts.  In this regard,  it should be noted that interest  income
that is derived from obligations held 

<PAGE>

through repurchase  agreements,  even though derived from Minnesota  obligations
the  interest  income from which would be exempt,  will not qualify  under these
rules, and any exempt interests dividends that are attributable to such interest
will be added to federal  adjusted  gross income and be subjected to the regular
Minnesota income tax in the case of individuals, estates, and trusts.

         While there is no  Minnesota  authority  directly in point,  we believe
that pursuant to the above provision of the Minnesota statutes, and the facts as
we have described them, the exempt-interest dividends that will be received with
respect to the Minnesota  Class of Shares by  individuals,  estates,  and trusts
that  are  holders  thereof,  will be  derived  from the  Minnesota  obligations
specified  above,  to the extent that such specified  obligations  represent the
obligations   of  the  Minnesota   Class  of  Shares  that  have  generated  the
exempt-interest  dividends.  Hence,  such  exempt-interest  dividends  should be
exempt from the regular Minnesota income tax with respect to such  shareholders.
To the extent that other  investments of the Minnesota  Class of Shares generate
exempt-interest  dividends as defined in section  852(b)(5)(A)  of the Code that
are  not  derived  from  the  Minnesota  obligations  referred  to  above,  such
exempt-interest  dividends  will  be  required  to  be  taken  into  account  in
determining the regular  Minnesota  taxable income of an individual,  estate, or
trust. In addition,  other income attributable to other sources,  including long
and short-term capital gain, that is received by an individual,  estate or trust
with  respect to the shares of the  Minnesota  Class of Shares will not e exempt
from the regular  Minnesota  income tax,  Finally,  in the case of a corporation
that is subject to the Minnesota excise tax on corporations  that is measured by
taxable net income, not even exempt-interest  dividends that are attributable to
the specified Minnesota obligations will be exempt from Minnesota tax.

         Our  conclusions  that  are  stated  above  are  based  on the  current
provisions  of  the   Minnesota   statutes  and  such  other   authorities   and
interpretations  as we have deemed  appropriate,  all of which,  of course,  are
subject to change or revision, and the facts and assumptions that we have stated
herein.  Moreover,  as  previously  indicated,  we  note  that  in  reaching  he
conclusion  that  exempt-interest  dividends  will be  exempt  from the  regular
Minnesota income tax when received with respect to the Minnesota Class of Shares
by holders thereof who are individuals,  estates and trusts,  to the extent such
exempt-interest  dividends are derived from the specified Minnesota  obligations
described above, we are not aware of any Minnesota  statute,  regulation or case
which  describes  when income from one trust,  with many  classes of shares,  is
treated as being  derived  from the assets  that are  deemed  attributable  to a
particular  class of shares  pursuant to the  provisions of the  Declaration  of
Trust of the particular trust.  However, we are also familiar with the fact that
the  Minnesota  Department of Revenue has issued a ruling in which it recognized
that provisions  similar to those described  herein were sufficient to treat the
income  from  one  series  of  a  regulated   investment  company  as  belonging
exclusively to the shareholders who owned the outstanding shares of that 

<PAGE>

series. While not binding on the State of Minnesota,  this ruling is nonetheless
informative.  Finally,  we are aware that under the recently enacted federal Tax
Reform Act of 1986, a new  subsection  has been added to section 851 of the Code
that provides that where a regulated  investment  company has more than on fund,
each  fund  shall  be  treated  as  a  separate  corporation,   except  for  the
definitional  requirement of section 851 (a) of the Code. A "fund" is defined in
the new provision as a "segregated portfolio of assets, the beneficial interests
of which are owned by the holders of a class or series of stock of the regulated
investment company that is preferred over all other classes or series in respect
of such portfolio of assets." This provision is effective, for federal purposes,
for  taxable  years  beginning  after  October 22,  1986,  the date of the law's
enactment.  If the State of  Minnesota  adopts this rule,  this will confirm the
conclusion reached in this letter as to the application of the regular Minnesota
income tax to exempt interest dividends that are received by shareholders of the
Minnesota class of Shares who are individuals, estates, or trusts.

         Apart from its regular  income tax,  Minnesota  imposes an  alternative
minimum tax (see Minn.  Stat.  ss.290.091) in the case of individuals,  estates,
and  trusts.  This  tax is  based,  in  part,  on such  taxpayers'  federal  tax
preference  items.  The federal Tax Reform Act of 1986  provides,  effective for
taxable  years  beginning  after  December 31, 1986,  that interest on specified
private activity bonds will be a federal tax preference item, and that an exempt
interest  dividend of a regulated  investment  company will constitute a federal
tax preference item to the extent of its proportionate  share of the interest on
such private activity bonds.  Accordingly,  if Minnesota  continues to impose an
alternative minimum tax that is based on federal tax preference items, and if no
exception is made for interest on specified  private  activity  bonds and exempt
interest dividends  attributable  thereto, then for taxable year beginning after
December 31, 1986, holders of the Minnesota Class of Shares who are individuals,
estates, or trusts may be subject to the Minnesota  alternative minimum tax as a
result of the receipt of exempt interest dividends that are attributable to such
private  activity bond interest,  even though they are also  attributable to the
Minnesota sources that would permit such exempt interest  dividends to be exempt
from the regular  Minnesota income tax. In addition,  as a result of legislation
enacted  in 1986 by the  Minnesota  legislature,  the  entire  portion of exempt
interest  dividends  that is  attributable  to sources other than such Minnesota
sources,  and that is received by holders of the  Minnesota  Class of Shares who
are  individuals,  estates or trusts,  is subject to the  Minnesota  alternative
minimum tax, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1985.

         We hereby  consent to the  filing of this  opinion as an exhibit to the
registration statement to be filed on November 17, 1986, with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission,  and to the reference to us under the heading  "Minnesota"
that deals with Minnesota taxes. 

<PAGE>

In giving such  consent,  we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of
persons whose consent is required under section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Faegre & Benson

                                            FAEGRE & BENSON


                                   LAW OFFICES

                            SHOOK, HARDY & BACON P.C.

                              ONE KANSAS CITY PLACE
                                1200 MAIN STREET
                        KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64105-2118
                                  (816)474-6550


                                  April 8, 1993



First Investors Multi-State Insured
  Tax Free Fund
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

         RE:  FIRST INVESTORS MULTI-STATE INSURED TAX FREE FUND-                
              MISSOURI SERIES

Gentlemen:

         We  have  acted  as  Missouri  tax  counsel  for  the  First  Investors
Multi-State  Insured  Tax Free  Fund (the  "Fund"),  which  was  organized  as a
Massachusetts  business trust on October 30, 1985. The Fund offers several state
series,  one of which  will be the First  Investors  Missouri  Insured  Tax Free
Series (the "Missouri Series").

         We understand  that the Missouri Series will invest at least 80% of its
assets in a portfolio of debt obligations  issued by the State of Missouri,  its
municipal  governments or public  authorities  ("Missouri  Obligations"),  or by
territories or possessions of the United States, the interest on which is exempt
from federal income  taxation and from income  taxation by the State of Missouri
and its municipal governments and public authorities.  Although the objective of
the Missouri Series is to provide income that is exempt from federal,  state and
local income  taxation for residents of Missouri,  the fund may invest up to 20%
of the assets of the Missouri  Series in debt  obligations the interest on which
is subject to taxation by the United  States  and/or the State of Missouri,  its
municipal governments and public authorities.

         You have  advised us that the Missouri  Series  intends to qualify as a
"regulated  investment  company,"  as such term is defined in Section 851 of the
Internal Revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). We specifically  refrain
from  expressing any opinion as to whether the Missouri Series will qualify as a
regulated  investment  company under Part I of Subchapter M of the Code,  and we
have not been furnished with any Internal Revenue

<PAGE>

Service  ruling  letter or opinion  of counsel as to the status of the  Missouri
Series as a regulated investment company.

         In rendering this opinion, we have assumed the following:

                  (1) That the Missouri Series will qualify as a "regulated
investment company," as such term is defined in Section 851 of the Code;

                  (2) That dividends paid by the Missouri  Series and designated
as "exempt-interest dividends" as required by Section 852(b)(5) of the Code will
qualify as interest  excludable  from a  shareholder's  gross income for federal
income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code;

                  (3) That  dividend   distributions  by  the  Missouri  Series
attributable to net short-term capital gain realized by the Missouri Series will
be taxed at the rates  that apply to  ordinary  income  for  federal  income tax
purposes;

                  (4)  That  dividend   distributions  by  the  Missouri  Series
attributable  to "net capital  gain" (as such term is used in Section  852(b) of
the Code)  realized  by the  Missouri  Series  will be taxable to the  recipient
shareholder as long-term capital gain for federal income tax purposes;

                  (5)  That   dividends   paid  by  the   Missouri   Series  and
attributable  to interest  earned on  obligations  of the United  States will be
includible  in a  shareholder's  adjusted  gross  income for federal  income tax
purposes;

                  (6) That the  Missouri  Series  will  notify its  shareholders
within 60 days after the close of its taxable year as to the amount of dividends
exempted from taxation by the State of Missouri;

                  Our analysis of Missouri law, as it relates to shareholders of
the Missouri Series, is set forth below:


I.       Application of Missouri State Income Tax

                  Under Mo. Rev.  Stat.  ss.  143.121,  the Missouri  adjusted  
gross income of an individual is the individual's federal adjusted gross income,
subject to certain modifications. Similarly, under Mo. Rev. Stat. ss.ss. 143.341
and 143.351,  the Missouri taxable income of an estate or trust is the estate or
trust's federal taxable income, subject to certain modifications. Finally, under
Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 143.431,  the Missouri  taxable income of a corporation is so
much of its federal  taxable  income  (subject to certain  modifications)  as is
derived from sources within Missouri. Under these provisions, exempt-interest

<PAGE>

dividends paid by the Missouri Series and excludable  from the federal  adjusted
gross income of a shareholder  under Sections  852(b)(5) and 103 of the Code are
exempt  from  income  taxation  by the  State  of  Missouri  absent  a  specific
modification provision to the contrary.

         A.  Dividends   attributable  to  interest  on  Missouri   Obligations.
Exempt-interest  dividends  paid by the  Missouri  Series  and  attributable  to
interest  earned by the  Missouri  Series  on  Missouri  Obligations  are not an
addition to the shareholder's  federal adjusted gross income and are, therefore,
exempt from Missouri income taxation.  Specifically,  regulations promulgated by
the Missouri  Department of Revenue (the  "Regulations")  state that a regulated
investment company may designate federal exempt-interest  dividends attributable
to interest  earned on  obligations  of the State of Missouri and its  political
subdivisions  as  dividends  that  need  not be  included  in the  shareholder's
Missouri taxable income. Mo. Code Regs. Title 12, ss. 10-2.155(4).

         B.       Dividends attributable to interests on obligations of other 
states.  To compute  Missouri income for individuals,  trusts and  corporations,
interest  on  obligations  of other  states  (or their  political  subdivisions)
excluded  from federal  adjusted  gross income under  Section 103 of the Code is
added to federal adjusted gross income. Mo Rev. Stat. ss. 143.121.2(a);  Mo. Rev
Stat. ss. 143.341.3; Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 143.351.2; Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 143.431.2.
Consistent  with the foregoing,  the  Regulations  provide that  exempt-interest
dividends  attributable to interest on obligations of states other than Missouri
(or  the  political   subdivisions   of  such  states)  are  includible  in  the
shareholder's Missouri taxable income. Mo. Code Regs. Title 12, ss. 10-2.155(4).

         C.       Dividends attributable to interest on obligations of 
territories  or  possessions  of the United  States.  Interest on obligations of
territories or possessions of the United States  excluded from federal  adjusted
gross income under  Section 103 of the Code is added to federal  adjusted  gross
income to compute Missouri income, unless exempted from Missouri income taxation
by federal law. Mo. Rev.  Stat.  ss.  143.121.2(b).  Under this  authority,  the
Regulations  provide that a regulated  investment  company may designate federal
exempt-interest  dividends  attributable  to interest  earned on  obligations of
territories  and possessions of the United States as dividends which need not be
included in the shareholder's Missouri taxable income,  provided the interest on
such  obligations  is exempted from  Missouri  taxation by federal law. Mo. Code
Regs.  Title 12, ss.  10-2.155(4).  All bonds  issued by Puerto  Rico (or by its
authority), the Virgin Islands (or any municipality thereof), or Guam (or by its
authority) are exempt from state taxation. 48 U.S.C. ss.ss. 745, 1403 and 1423a.
Accordingly,  exempt-interest  dividends  attributable  to  interest  earned  on
obligations issued by Puerto Rico (or by its authority),  the Virgin Islands (or
any  municipality  thereof),  or Guam  (or by its  authority)  are  exempt  

<PAGE>

from taxation by the State of Missouri  because such  dividends are not required
to be added back to the shareholder's  federal adjusted gross income pursuant to
Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 143.121.2(b).

         D.       Dividends attributable to interest on obligations of the 
United  States.  A taxpayer  subject to the  Missouri  income tax is entitled to
subtract  from federal  adjusted  gross income  interest on  obligations  of the
United States.  Mo. Rev. Stat. ss.  143.121.3(a).  The Regulations  provide that
this  reduction of federal  adjusted  gross income  applies also to any dividend
paid by a regulated  investment  company that is attributable to interest earned
on  obligations  of the  United  States  and  is  designated  by  the  regulated
investment company as a state income tax  exempt-interest  dividend in a written
notice mailed to its  shareholders not later than 60 days after the close of its
taxable year (a "U.S. Dividend"). Mo. Code Regs. Title 12, ss. 10-2.155(2). This
written notice must state the amount of interest paid or expense incurred by the
regulated investment company in the production of the U.S. Dividends. Id.

                  The Regulations also state that the amount of the reduction of
federal adjusted gross income for each shareholder is equal to the amount of the
shareholder's U.S. Dividends reduced by (1) interest paid or expense incurred to
produce  such  dividends,  to the extent the interest  paid or expense  incurred
exceeds $500 and (2) the federal corporate dividend received deduction,  if any,
attributable to such dividends.  Mo. Code Regs. Title 12, ss.  10-2.155(2).  the
Missouri  Department  of Revenue has  indicated,  however,  that the  provisions
relating to interest  and other  expenses do not apply if the  aggregate  amount
designated  as a U.S.  Dividend by the  regulated  investment  company  does not
exceed the amount of interest  received by the regulated  investment  company on
obligations  of the United States less the amount of interest and other expenses
incurred by the regulated investment company to produce such interest.




                  In order to qualify for the reduction of federal adjusted 
gross income  discussed  above,  a shareholder  is required to attach to his/her
Missouri  income  tax return a copy of a year-end  statement  received  from the
regulated  investment company either (a) identifying (by issuer) all obligations
of the United States held by the regulated  investment company or (b) indicating
the  percentage of dividends paid by the regulated  investment  company that are
attributable  to interest on obligations  of the United  States.  Mo. Code Regs.
Title 12, ss. 10-2.155(3).

         E.  Dividends  attributable  to gain from the sale of  obligations.  In
computing a shareholder's Missouri taxable income, Missouri law does not provide
an exclusion for dividend distributions from a regulated investment company that
are  attributable  to gain  realized by such  company on the sale or 

<PAGE>

exchange of exempt  obligations.  Thus, such distributions will be included in a
shareholder's  federal  adjusted  gross  income and subject to tax for  Missouri
income tax purposes.

         F. Gain from the sale of shares of the Missouri Series. Similarly, gain
realized by a shareholder  from the sale or other  disposition  of his shares of
the Missouri Series will be included in a shareholder's  federal  adjusted gross
income and thus subject to tax for Missouri income tax purposes.

II.      Application of City Earnings and Profits Tax

                  Missouri law authorizes the cities of St. Louis, Kansas City 
and St.  Joseph  to impose an  earnings  and  profits  tax (the  "City  Tax") on
individuals  and on certain  corporations,  associations,  businesses  and other
activities.  Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 92.110;  Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 92.210. The enabling
statutes provide that interest on Missouri Obligations, or on obligations of the
United States or its  possessions,  is exempt from the City Tax. Mo. Rev.  Stat.
ss. 92.130.2(5);  Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 92.220.2(5).  The taxing authorities in the
cities of St. Louis and Kansas City take the  position  that the portion of each
dividend paid by a regulated investment company, or on obligations of the United
States or its  possessions,  is exempt from the City Tax. St. Joseph has not yet
implemented a City Tax.

         A.       Certain individual taxpayers.  With respect to individuals who
are not engaged in a trade or  business,  the City Tax applies only to salaries,
wages,  commissions and other compensation.  Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 92.110; Mo. Rev.
Stat. ss. 92.210.  Thus, all dividends received by such individual  shareholders
of the Missouri Series should not be subject to the City Tax.

         B.  Business  taxpayers.  With  respect  to  taxpayers  other  than the
individuals described above ("Business Taxpayers"),  the City Tax of Kansas City
(the "Kansas City Tax")  applies only to income  arising from  activities in the
regular course of the taxpayer's  trade or business.  Mo. Rev. Stat. ss. 92.210.
Thus, if a Business  Taxpayer holds shares of the Missouri Series for investment
purposes  and not as part of its  ordinary  trade  or  business,  the  dividends
received  by such  Business  Taxpayer  from the  Missouri  Series  should not be
subject to the Kansas City Tax. However,  if a Business Taxpayer holds shares of
the  Missouri  Series  as part of its  ordinary  trade  or  business,  dividends
received by such taxpayer should be subject to the Kansas City Tax to the extent
such dividends are not attributable to interest earned on Missouri  Obligations,
or on obligations of the United States or its possessions.

                  In general, the City Tax of St. Louis (the "St. Louis Tax") 
applies to Business  Taxpayers  in the same  manner as the Kansas City Tax.  Mo.
Rev.  Stat.  ss.  92.110.  However,  in the case of a partnership or corporation
having its business domicile in

<PAGE>

St. Louis, the taxing authorities in St. Louis take the position that all income
recognized by such  partnership or  corporation  arises in the regular course of
the taxpayer's trade or business.

                  Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
that, under existing law:

                  1. If a dividend paid by the Missouri  Series  qualifies as an
exempt-interest  dividend  under Section  852(b)(5) of the Code,  the portion of
such  exempt-interest  dividend that is attributable to interest received by the
Missouri  Series on Missouri  Obligations,  or on  obligations of territories or
possessions of the United States (to the extent federal law exempts  interest on
such  obligations  from state  taxation),  will not be  subject to the  Missouri
income tax when received by a shareholder of the Missouri  Series,  provided the
Missouri  Series  properly  designates  such  portion as an exempt  dividend  (a
"Missouri Dividend" ) under Missouri law.

2.  Dividends  paid by the  Missouri  Series that are  attributable  to interest
received by the Missouri  Series on obligations of the United States will not be
subject  to the  Missouri  income  tax when  received  by a  shareholder  of the
Missouri Series,  provided (i) the Missouri Series sends a written notice to the
shareholder   within  60  days  after  the  close  of  its  taxable  year  which
specifically  designates as "state income tax  exempt-interest  dividends" those
dividends  attributable  to interest  earnd on obligations of the United States;
(ii) the notice  referred to in clause (i) specifies the amount of interest paid
or expense  incurred by the  Missouri  Series in the  production  of such "state
income tax exempt-interest  dividends" and indicates the percentage of dividends
paid by the  Missouri  Series  that  are  attributable  to  interest  earned  on
obligations  of the United States;  (iii) the amount of dividends  designated as
"state income tax  exempt-interest  dividends"  by the Missouri  Series does not
exceed the amount of interest  received by the Missouri Series on obligations of
the United States less the amount of interest and other expense  incurred by the
Missouri Series to produce such interest;  and (iv) the shareholder  attaches to
his/her Missouri income tax return a summary document  indicating the percentage
of  dividends  paid by the  Missouri  Series that are  attributable  to interest
earned on obligations of the United States.

                  3. Except as provided in  Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,  the State
of Missouri has no special exemption  provisions,  for (i) dividends received by
shareholders of a regulated investment company or (ii) capital gains realized by
shareholders  of a  regulated  investment  company  upon the sale or exchange of
shares of such company. Thus, in the case of shareholders who are subject to the
Missouri  income tax and who,  under  applicable  law,  are  required to include
capital gain, dividend and interest 

<PAGE>

income  in  their  Missouri  taxable  income,  all  dividends  (except  Missouri
Dividends and dividends properly designated as "state income tax exempt-interest
dividends" under Missouri law) paid by the Missouri Series to such shareholders,
and all gains realized by such  shareholders on the redemption or sale of shares
of the Missouri Series, will be subject to the Missouri income tax.

                  4.  Except  as set forth in  paragraph  (a)  below,  dividends
received by (i) an  individual  shareholder  of the  Missouri  Series who is not
engaged in a trade or business,  or (ii) a Business Taxpayer who holds shares of
the  Missouri  Series for  investment  purposes  and not as part of its ordinary
trade or  business,  will  not be  subject  to the City  Tax.  With  respect  to
dividends  received  by a  Business  Taxpayer  who  holds  shares as part of its
ordinary  trade or  business,  each  dividend (or portion  thereof)  paid by the
Missouri Series that is attributable to interest earned on Missouri Obligations,
or on obligations of the United States or its  possessions,  will not be subject
to the City Tax;  however,  except as set forth in  paragraph  (b) below,  other
dividends  received by such Business  Taxpayer will be subject to the applicable
City Tax, to the extent such Business Taxpayer is otherwise subject to such tax.


                           (a)      The taxing authorities in St. Louis take the
position  that all of the  assets of a  partnership  or  corporation  having its
business  domicile  in St.  Louis  should  be  treated  as  held as part of such
entity's ordinary trade or business. Under this position,  dividends received on
shares of the Missouri Series held by such  partnership or corporation,  whether
or not held for  investment  purposes,  could be subject  to the St.  Louis Tax.
There is no express  authority for this position,  and a taxpayer could take the
position that dividends  received by any  corporation or partnership  that holds
shares of the Missouri Series for investment purposes  ("Investment  Dividends")
should not be subject to the St. Louis Tax. Therefore,  we specifically  refrain
from  expressing  an opinion as to whether  Investment  Dividends  received by a
partnership  or  corporation  having its business  domicile in St. Louis (to the
extent such  Investment  Dividends are not  attributable  to interest  earned on
Missouri Obligations, or on obligations of the United States or its possessions)
are subject to St. Louis Tax.

                           (b)      The enabling statutes for the City Tax do 
not indicate  whether  obligations of territories (as opposed to possessions) of
the United  States  are exempt  from the City Tax.  Therefore,  we  specifically
refrain  from  expressing  an opinion as to whether  dividends  attributable  to
interest  earned on  obligations  of territories of the United States are exempt
from the City Tax.

                  We have not examined any of the  obligations to be acquired by
the Missouri  Series and express no opinion as to whether such  obligations,  or
the interest thereon, are in fact 

<PAGE>

exempt from any federal or Missouri taxes.

                  This opinion is furnished to you  specifically  in  connection
with the Missouri Series and solely for your information and benefit. It may not
be relied on by you in any other connection,  and it may not be relied on by any
other person for any purpose.

                  We do not express an opinion as to any matters governed by the
laws of any jurisdiction  other than the State of Missouri.  No expansion of our
opinion may be made by  implication  or  otherwise.  We express no opinion other
than as herein  expressly  set forth.  We do not  undertake to advise you of any
matter  within the scope of this  letter that comes to our  attention  after the
date of this  letter,  and we disclaim any  responsibility  to advise you of any
future changes in law or fact that may affect the above opinion.

                  We hereby  consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to the Post-Effective  Amendment No. 14 to the Fund's Registration  Statement on
Form N-1A and to the  reference to our firm in such  Registration  Statement and
the prospectus included therein.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ SHOOK, HARDY & BACON P.C.

                                            SHOOK, HARDY & BACON P.C.



                     WYRICK, ROBBINS, YATES & PONTON L.L.P.
                                ATTORNEYS AT LAW

                                   THE SUMMIT
                        4101 LAKE BOONE TRAIL, SUITE 300
                       RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607-7506

                                 MAILING ADDRESS
                            POST OFFICE DRAWER 17803
                          RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27619


                                 April 19, 1994




First Investors Multi-State Insured
  Tax Free Fund--North Carolina Series
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

         Re:  First Investors Multi-State Insured
                  Tax Free Fund - North Carolina Series

Gentlemen:

         We have acted as your special North  Carolina tax counsel in connection
with the First Investors  Multi-State Insured Tax Free Fund (the "Fund") and the
First  Investors  North  Carolina  Insured Tax Free Series (the "North  Carolina
Series") established as a part of the Fund.

         You  have  requested  our  opinion  regarding  (a)  the  taxability  of
distributions  from the North Carolina Series for purposes of the North Carolina
Individual  Income  Tax (in the  case of  individuals)  and the  North  Carolina
Corporation Income Tax (in the case of corporations), (b) the taxability of gain
upon  the  disposition  of  shares  of the  North  Carolina  Series  and (c) the
taxability  of property  held be the North  Carolina  Series for purposes of the
North Carolina Intangible Personal Property Tax.

         In furnishing  this opinion,  we have examined the  prospectus  for the
Fund  (the  "Prospectus")  and the  Statement  of  Additional  Information  (the
"Statement"),  each  relating to the North  Carolina  Series and  certain  other
series of the Fund; we have reviewed and considered the provisions of applicable
law as set forth in  Chapter  105 of the  General  Statutes  of North  Carolina,
particularly   those  of  Subchapter  I,  Article  4,  Schedule  D,  Division  I
(Corporation  Income  Tax),  Subchapter  I, Article 4,  Schedule D,  Division II
(Individual  Income Tax),  and  Subchapter  I, Article 7, Schedule H (Intangible
Personal  Property),  and  regulations,  income tax  bulletins  and  information
releases promulgated by the North Carolina Department of Revenue 

<PAGE>

thereunder;  and we have reviewed and considered applicable opinions rendered by
the  office  of the  Attorney  General  of North  Carolina  with  regard  to the
foregoing.   In  addition,   we  have  requested  and  received   statements  of
administrative  position  from the  Individual  Income Tax Division of the North
Carolina  Department  of Revenue  and from the  Intangibles  Tax  Section of the
Property  Tax  Division of the North  Carolina  Department  of Revenue,  and our
opinion is based in part on such statements of administrative position.

         We have assumed for  purposes of this  opinion that the North  Carolina
Series  intends to qualify  and will  continue  to be  qualified  as a regulated
investment  company as defined in Section 851 of the  Internal  Revenue  Code of
1986,  as amended (the  "Code"),  eligible to pay and  intending  to  distribute
"Exempt  Interest  Dividends"  as provided in Section  852(b)(5) of the Code. We
have also assumed that the Fund and the North  Carolina  Series will be operated
in the manner described in the Prospectus and the Statement.

         Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion under existing North Carolina
law that:

         (1) Shareholders of the North Carolina Series who are otherwise subject
to the North Carolina  individual or corporate income tax will not be subject to
either such tax on North Carolina Series  distributions  to the extent that such
distributions  qualify as Exempt Interest Dividends under the Code and represent
(a)  interest  on direct  obligations  of the United  States or its  possessions
(i.e., generally excluding obligations merely backed or guaranteed by the United
States government),  obligations of the State of North Carolina or its political
subdivisions,  or obligations of nonprofit educational institutions organized or
chartered  under the laws of the State of North  Carolina,  or (b) interest upon
obligations, and gain from the disposition of obligations, if the North Carolina
law under which the obligations were issued specifically exempts the interest or
gain  from such  taxes  (collectively,  "North  Carolina  Exempt  Obligations"),
subject to the  requirement  set forth in clause  (3)  below.  A list of certain
federal and North Carolina  obligations  which qualify as North Carolina  Exempt
Obligations is attach hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.

         (2) A shareholder of the North Carolina Series who is otherwise subject
to North  Carolina  income tax will generally  recognize  capital gain for North
Carolina  income tax  purposes  to the same  extent as a  shareholder  would for
federal income tax purposes when the North Carolina  Series makes a capital gain
distribution or a shareholder disposes of shares. However, North Carolina Series
capital gain distributions which are attributable to debt obligations  expressly
exempt from tax on gain under North  Carolina law are exempt from North Carolina
income taxation, subject to the requirement set forth in clause (3).

<PAGE>

         (3) In the absence of a supporting  statement  from the North  Carolina
Series setting forth amounts received which represent distributions attributable
to North Carolina Exempt Obligations, the total amount designated as exempt from
tax is fully subject to North Carolina income tax.

         (4)  Distributions  by the North Carolina Series of interest on federal
obligations  will not be treated as  dividends  for  purposes of the six percent
dividend   tax  credit  which  might   otherwise  be  available  to   individual
shareholders  because  such  interest  is  treated  as  flowing  through  to the
shareholders.

         (5)  Shareholders  of the  North  Carolina  Series,  who are  otherwise
subject  to the North  Carolina  intangible  personal  property  tax on the fair
market  value of shares of stock and mutual  funds held on  December  31 of each
year, will not be subject to such tax thereon to the extent that the share value
of the North  Carolina  Series is reduced by a percentage  equal to the ratio of
direct obligations of the United States government and direct obligations of the
State of North Carolina and its political  subdivisions to the total investments
held by the North  Carolina  Series as of December 31 of each year.  Such direct
obligations  generally  include  all North  Carolina  Exempt  Obligations.  Upon
request,  however, a shareholder must be able to provide  information to support
any percentage reduction in share value and thus sustain any deduction claimed.

         (6)  Indebtedness  owed to a broker,  bank or other  party  incurred to
purchase  shares of the North  Carolina  Series as listed on the  intangible tax
return  may be  deducted  from  the  taxable  value  of such  shares  owned  (as
determined  pursuant to (5) above),  subject to the following  requirements  and
limitations:  the indebtedness  must be incurred directly to purchase the shares
of the  North  Carolina  Series;  the  shares  purchased  with  proceeds  of the
indebtedness must be pledged as collateral; the amount of indebtedness allowable
is limited to the same  percentage  that the taxable  value of the shares of the
North Carolina Series purchased with the borrowed money (as determined  pursuant
to (5) above relates to the total value of such shares;  the amount of allowable
indebtedness  may not  exceed  the  taxable  value of the  shares  of the  North
Carolina  Series  purchased with proceeds of the  indebtedness;  and information
supporting a claim of allowable indebtedness must be furnished upon request.

         The North Carolina tax disclosure relating to the North Carolina Series
appearing in the Prospectus under the heading  "Taxes--State Income Taxes--North
Carolina,"  the   information  in  the  Prospectus   designated  as  "Investment
Objectives  and Policies -- State  Specific Risk Factors -- Risk Factors for the
North  Carolina  Series," and the  information  in the  Statement  designated as
"State Specific Rick Factors -- Risk Factors for the North Carolina Series," all
having been  prepared by us for inclusion  therein,  are accurate as of the date
hereof.  We  express  no opinion as to the  accuracy  or  adequacy  of any other
information in the Prospectus or the Statement.

<PAGE>

         We  consent  to  the  inclusion  of  this  opinion  as  an  exhibit  to
Post-Effective  Amendment  No. 15 to the Fund's  Registration  Statement on Form
N-1A as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("Post-Effective
Amendment No. 15") and the  applications  and  registration  statements filed in
accordance with the securities laws of the several states in which shares of the
North Carolina  Series are to be offered.  We further  consent to the use of our
name and the references to our firm in  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 15 and the
related  Prospectus  and the  reference in the  Prospectus to the fact that this
opinion has been rendered.

                                           Very truly yours,

                              /s/Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton L.L.P.

<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT A

         The Revenue  Department  considers net interest from obligations issued
under the borrowing  power of the following  entities to be interest from direct
obligations of the United States or its  possessions  and thus exempt from North
Carolina  income tax:  Puerto Rico,  the Virgin  Islands and Guam;  Federal Land
Banks;  Federal Home Loan Banks;  Federal  Intermediate  Credit Banks; Farm Home
Administration;  Export-Import  Bank  of the  United  States;  Tennessee  Valley
Authority;   Banks  for  Cooperatives;   U.S.  Treasury  bonds,   notes,  bills,
certificates and savings bonds; Student Loan Marketing  Association;  Production
Credit  Association;  Federal Farm Credit Bank;  Federal Financing Bank; Federal
Savings and Loan Insurance  Corporation;  Federal Deposit Insurance Fund; United
States Postal Service; Resolution Funding Corporation; and Financing Corporation
(chartered by the Federal Housing Finance Board - 12 USCS 12-1441).

         Examples of obligations on which interest and gain from disposition are
specifically  exempted by statute  include  obligations  issued  under  N.C.G.S.
131E-28 by the North Carolina Hospital  Authorities;  under N.C.G.S.  131A-21 by
the North  Carolina  Medical Care  Commission  under the Health Care  Facilities
Finance  Act;  under  N.C.G.S.  122A-19 by the North  Carolina  Housing  Finance
Agency; under N.C.G.S.  159B-26 by the Joint Municipal Electric Power and Energy
Act;  under  N.C.G.S.  116-183  and  116-196 by the boards of  trustees of State
supported  colleges and universities in North Carolina;  under N.C.G.S.  115E-21
under the  provisions  of the Higher  Education  Facilities  Finance Acct by the
North Carolina Educational Facilities Finance Agency; and under N.C.G.S. 122D-14
by the  North  Carolina  Agricultural  Finance  Authority;  and  under  N.C.G.S.
63A-9(1) by the North Carolina Air Cargo Airport Authority.

         Examples  of   obligations   on  which  interest  (but  not  gain  from
disposition)  are  specifically  exempted by statute  include  interest on bonds
issued by the North Carolina State Ports authority  under N.C.G.S.  143B-456(g);
interest on any  evidence of  indebtedness  issued by a North  Carolina  Housing
Authority  under N.C.G.S.  157-26;  interest on bonds issued by the  authorities
created under the  Industrial  and Pollution  Control  Facilities  Financing Act
under N.C.G.S.  159C-14; and income from securities,  evidences of indebtedness,
and shares of capital stock issued by corporations organized to promote, develop
and advance the prosperity  and economic  welfare of the State of North Carolina
under N.C.G.S. 53A-15.



                            SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY

                               Counsellors at Law
                            1800 Huntington Building
                              Cleveland, Ohio 44115


                                  July 19, 1988


First Investors Multi-State Tax Free Fund
120 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

                                 Re: Ohio Taxes

Gentlemen:

                  You have  requested  our opinion as to the Ohio tax aspects of
the Ohio Series which is part of the First  Investors  Multi-State Tax Free Fund
(the "Fund"). The Fund is an open-end  diversified  management company organized
as a business trust under the laws of Massachusetts.  The Fund's  declaration of
trust  authorizes  the Trustees to establish one or more classes or series of an
unlimited  number of shares,  without  par value,  of the Trust,  with each such
share representing an equal proportionate  interest in the class with each other
share of the class  outstanding.  One class of shares in the Fund  represent the
beneficial interest in the Ohio Series.

                  The Ohio  Series  will invest  primarily  in  interest-bearing
obligations issued by or on behalf of the State of Ohio, political  subdivisions
thereof  and  agencies  and  instrumentalities  of the  State  or its  political
subdivisions  (the "Ohio  Obligations"),  and by the governments of Puerto Rico,
the  Virgin   Islands  and  Guam  and  their   authorities   or   municipalities
("Territorial Obligations") (collectively, the "Obligations"). In the opinion of
bond counsel as to each issue of bonds in the Ohio Series,  rendered on the date
of  issuance,  interest on such bonds is excluded  from gross income for federal
income tax purposes under Section  103(a) of the Internal  Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the "Code"),  or other provisions of federal law, provided that with
respect to certain  Obligations,  certain continuing  covenants of the issuer or
other borrower are satisfied.

                  Dividends  on the Ohio Series  will be declared  daily and, at
each  shareholder's  option,  either reinvested in additional shares of the Ohio
Series on the last  business day of the month,  or paid in cash on the twentieth
day of the following month.

<PAGE>

                  You have advised us that the Fund and each series of the fund,
including the Ohio Series, intend to qualify as "regulated investment companies"
within  the  meaning  of  Section  851 of the Code  and to pay  "exempt-interest
dividends" within the meaning of Section 852(b)(5) of the Code, i.e.,  dividends
that are exempt from federal income tax in the hands of the Fund's shareholders.
We have  assumed for the  purposes of this opinion that at all times at least 50
percent of the value of the total assets of the Ohio Series will consist of Ohio
Obligations.

                  Based  upon  the  foregoing  and  upon an  examination  of the
Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 for the Fund and
such other  documents  and an  investigation  of such other matters of law as we
have deemed necessary,  we are of the opinion that under existing law applicable
to shareholders of the Ohio Series:

                  1. The Ohio Series is not subject to the Ohio personal  income
tax, the Ohio corporation franchise tax, or the Ohio dealers in intangibles tax.

                  2.  Shareholders of the Ohio Series  ("Shareholders")  who are
otherwise  subject to the Ohio personal  income tax imposed on  individuals  and
estates will not be subject to such tax on distributions  with respect to shares
of the Ohio Series to the extent that such  distributions  are  attributable  to
interest on Ohio Obligations and such  distributions  either (a) are received or
deemed received in a tax year of the Shareholder  ending after June 30, 1988, or
(b) represent "exempt-interest dividends" for federal income tax purposes.

                  3.   Shareholders  who  are  otherwise  subject  to  the  Ohio
corporation  franchise  tax computed on the net income basis will not be subject
to such tax on  distributions  with  respect to Shares of the Ohio Series to the
extent that such  distributions  either (a) are attributable to interest on Ohio
Obligations and are received or deemed received in a tax year of the Shareholder
ending after June 30, 1988, or (b)  represent  "exempt-interest  dividends"  for
federal  income tax  purposes.  Shares of the Ohio  Series will be included in a
Shareholder's tax base for purposes of computing the Ohio corporation  franchise
tax on the net worth basis.

                  4. Shareholders who are otherwise subject to the Ohio personal
income tax imposed on individuals and estates or the Ohio corporation  franchise
tax  computed  on the net  income  basis  will not be  subject  to such taxes on
distributions  of capital gains with respect to shares of the Ohio Series to the
extent  that such  distributions  are  attributable  to profit made on the sale,
exchange or other  disposition by the Ohio Series of Ohio  Obligations  and such
distributions  are received or deemed  received in a tax year of the Shareholder
ending after June 30, 1988.


<PAGE>

                  5.  Distributions  with  respect to the Ohio  Series  that are
attributable  to interest on obligations of the United States or its territories
or possessions or of any authority, commission, or instrumentality of the United
States  that is exempt  from  state  income  taxes  under the laws of the United
States (including the Territorial  Obligations) is exempt from the Ohio personal
income tax and Ohio  municipal  income taxes and is excluded from the net income
base of the Ohio corporation franchise tax.

                  6. Except as stated in the next sentence,  Ohio municipalities
may not  impose  income  taxes  on  interest  on or  profit  made on the sale of
intangible  property,  including  Obligations.  Municipalities that, pursuant to
local ordinance, taxed any type of intangible income on or before April 1, 1986,
may tax such intangible income that is distributed or deemed  distributed in tax
years of  Shareholders  ending in 1988, and may continue to tax such  intangible
income thereafter if approved by the electors of the municipality in an election
held on November 8, 1988;  however, it is not clear that such municipalities may
tax  interest on or profit made on the sale,  exchange or other  disposition  of
Ohio Obligations  that is distributed in tax years of Shareholders  ending after
June 30, 1988.

                  7. In addition to the above exemptions, specific Ohio statutes
authorizing the issuance of certain Ohio Obligations  generally provide that the
interest  on  and,  in some  cases,  gain  or  profit  from  the  sale or  other
disposition of such Ohio  Obligations are exempt from all taxation in the State.
Distributions with respect to shares of the Ohio Series attributable to interest
on and gain or profit from the sale or other  disposition of obligations  issued
pursuant to such statutes are exempt from the Ohio  personal  income tax and all
Ohio municipal income taxes (but not necessarily the net income base of the Ohio
corporation franchise tax).

                  8. Distributions with respect to the Ohio Series  attributable
to proceeds of  insurance  paid to the Ohio  Series that  represent  maturing or
matured  interest on defaulted  Obligations  held by the Ohio Series will not be
subject to State or  municipal  income taxes if, and to the same extent as, such
interest  would not have been subject to such taxes if paid in the normal course
by the issuer of such defaulted Obligations.

                  We have not examined any of the  obligations to be acquired by
the Fund and express no opinion as to whether such obligations, interest thereon
or gain from the sale or other  disposition  thereof are in fact exempt from any
federal or Ohio taxes.

                  We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to the Post-Effective  Amendment relating to the shares referred to above and to
the  reference to our Firm as special Ohio tax counsel in said  Amendment and in
the Prospectus contained therein.

                                            Respectfully submitted,

                                            /s/Squire, Sanders & Dempsey




                         WEISS, JENSEN, ELLIS & BOTTERI
                           A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
                                ATTORNEYS AT LAW

                             2300 U.S. BANCORP TOWER
                              111 S.W. FIFTH AVENUE
                             PORTLAND, OREGON 97204


                                February 13, 1992


First Investors Multi-State
 Insured Tax Free Fund
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

         Re:  First Investors Oregon Insured Tax Free Series ("Oregon           
              Series") - a Series of the First Investors Multi-State
              Insured Tax Free Fund ("Multi-State Fund")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         You have  requested  our opinion  regarding  the  taxability of certain
distributions  from the Oregon Series for purposes of the Oregon personal income
tax in the case of individual  investors and the Oregon  corporate excise tax in
the case of corporate investors.

         We understand the following:

         a.  The Oregon Series is one series of the Multi-State Fund.

         b. The Multi-State Fund was organized as a Massachusetts business trust
on October 30, 1985 and is a diversified open-end management investment company.

         c. The Oregon  Series  intends to qualify for  treatment as a regulated
investment  company under  Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code").

         d. The  Oregon  Series  intends to invest a  sufficient  portion of its
assets in a  diversified  portfolio  of  municipal  instruments  so that it will
qualify  to pay  "exempt-interest  dividends"  (within  the  meaning  of Section
852(b)(5)  of the  Code)  to  investors  holding  shares  in the  Oregon  Series
("Shareholders").

         e. The  municipal  instruments  held by the Oregon  Series will include
obligations  issued  by or on  behalf  of the  State  of  Oregon  and  municipal
governments  and  public  authorities  in  the  State  of  Oregon,  as  well  as
obligations  issued by territories  and possessions of the United States and the
District  of  Columbia   and  their   political   subdivisions,   agencies   and
instrumentalities,  if 


<PAGE>

the interest on such  obligations is statutorily  exempt from federal income tax
and the Oregon personal income tax.

         f. While the investment  objective of the Oregon Series is to provide a
high level of interest  income that is exempt  from  federal  income tax and the
Oregon personal income tax, the Oregon Series may invest a portion of its assets
(not to  exceed 20  percent)  from  time to time on a  temporary  basis in fixed
income assets that may be subject to federal income tax and the Oregon  personal
income tax.

         In rendering our opinion,  we have assumed that  dividends  paid by the
Oregon Series and designated as exempt-interest dividends as required by Section
852(b)(5) of the Code will qualify as interest  excludable  from a Shareholder's
gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code.

         Based  upon  and  subject  to  the   foregoing,   and  subject  to  any
qualifications  in the  paragraphs  below,  we are of  the  opinion  that  under
existing law:

         1. As long as the Oregon  Series  qualifies as a "regulated  investment
company"  under the Code,  and the dividend  distribution  is  designated by the
Oregon Series as a "state  exempt-interest  dividend" (within the meaning of ORS
316.683(2))  in a written notice mailed to  Shareholders  not later than 60 days
after  the  close  of the  Oregon  Series'  taxable  year,  the  portion  of any
distribution  from the Oregon Series that  represents  interest  received by the
Oregon Series on  obligations  (a) of Oregon or its political  subdivisions  and
authorities,  (b) of the United States  government,  or (c) of  territories  and
possessions  of  the  United  States  or  of  any  authority,   commission,   or
instrumentality of the United States (to the extent federal law exempts interest
on such obligations from state taxation) will be exempt from the Oregon personal
income tax when distributed to a Shareholder.

         2. Oregon has no special exemption provision for capital gain dividends
(defined in Section  852(b)(3) of the Code and excluded  from the  definition of
exempt-interest  dividends  in  Section  852(b)(5)  of the Code)  that  would be
available to a Shareholder.  Accordingly,  capital gain dividends distributed by
the Oregon Series to a Shareholder will be subject to the Oregon personal income
tax.

         3. If a Shareholder receives a state exempt-interest  dividend from the
Oregon Series with respect to shares in the Oregon  Series,  and such shares are
held by the Shareholder for less than six months, a loss, if any, on the sale of
such shares will be disallowed  for Oregon  personal  income tax purposes to the
extent of the amount of the state  exempt-interest  dividend  distributed to the
Shareholder with respect to such shares.

         4. A state exempt-interest dividend paid on shares of the Oregon Series
will be  subject  to the Oregon  personal  income  tax 


<PAGE>

to the extent  deductible  interest on  indebtedness  was incurred to carry such
shares.

         5.       Corporate Shareholders subject to the Oregon corporate excise 
tax must include in income distributions with respect to shares of the Oregon 
Series.

         We have not examined any of the  obligations  of the Oregon  Series and
express no opinion as to whether such  obligations,  interest  thereon,  or gain
from the sale or other  disposition  thereof are in fact exempt from the federal
income tax or the Oregon personal income tax.

         This opinion is furnished to you  specifically  in connection  with the
Oregon Series and it may not be relied upon by you in any other connection. This
opinion may not be assigned,  used or quoted without our prior written  consent.
We  hereby   consent  to  the  filing  of  this  opinion  as  an  exhibit  to  a
post-effective  amendment to the Registration  Statement on Form N-1A filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission  relating to the Multi-State Fund and to
the reference to our firm in such  post-effective  amendment to the Registration
Statement and in the Prospectus included therein. We undertake no responsibility
to update this opinion.

                                                     Very truly yours,

                                            Weiss, Jensen, Ellis & Botteri

                                            By:  /s/ Mark A. von Bergen
                                                     Mark A. von Bergen




                             KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART

                              1500 OLIVER BUILDING
                       PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15222-2312


                                  April 7, 1994



Trustees of the First Investors
Multi-State Insured Tax Free Fund
95 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

         Re:  First Investors Pennsylvania Insured Tax
              Free Series ("Pennsylvania Series") - a Series
              of the First Investors Multi-State Insured
              Tax Free Fund ("Multi-State Fund")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  You have requested our opinion regarding (i) the taxability of
distributions  from the  Pennsylvania  Series for purposes of the  "Pennsylvania
personal  income  tax"  (72 P.S.  ss.ss.  7301 to  7361)  and the  "Pennsylvania
corporate net income tax" (72 P.S. ss.ss.  7401 to 7410), (ii) the taxability of
shares of the  Pennsylvania  Series for  purposes  of the  "Pennsylvania  county
personal  property tax" (72 P.S. ss. 4821),  the "School  District of Pittsburgh
personal  property tax"  (enacted by  resolution  adopted by the Board of Public
Education  of the School  District of  Pittsburgh)  and the "City of  Pittsburgh
personal  property  tax"  (Chapter  261  of  Pittsburgh  Code),  and  (iii)  the
taxability of  distributions  from the  Pennsylvania  Series for purposes of the
"School  District of  Philadelphia  investment  net income tax" (ss.  19-1804 of
Philadelphia Code).

                  We understand  that the  Pennsylvania  Series is one series of
the Multi-State Fund, a business trust formed under the laws of the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts,  and that the Pennsylvania  Series is a "regulated  investment
company"  as defined in Section 851 of the  Internal  Revenue  Code of 1986,  as
amended (the "Code"), eligible to pay "Exempt-Interest Dividends" as provided in
Section  852(b)(5) of the Code. We also understand that the Pennsylvania  Series
invests  in, and intends to  continue  to invest in,  obligations  issued by the
Commonwealth  of  Pennsylvania,  public  authorities,   commissions,  boards  or
agencies created by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,  political subdivisions of
the  Commonwealth  of  Pennsylvania  or public  authorities  created by any such
political  subdivisions  and also  obligations  of the United States and certain
qualifying  agencies,  instrumentalities,  territories  and  possessions  of the
United States, the interest from which is statutorily free from state


<PAGE>

taxation in Pennsylvania under the laws of the Commonwealth or the United States
(collectively, "Exempt Obligations").

                  In furnishing  this opinion,  we have reviewed such provisions
of Pennsylvania  law, and such provisions of Pittsburgh and  Philadelphia law as
reported in standard compilations thereof, as we have deemed appropriate.

                  We have  assumed  for  purposes of this  opinion  that (i) the
Pennsylvania  Series  will  operate as a regulated  investment  company and that
earnings distributed by the Pennsylvania Series from its portfolio earnings will
constitute Exempt-Interest Dividends; (ii) the assets of the Pennsylvania Series
and of the Multi-State Fund will be held and managed outside of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania; (iii) a majority of the trustees of the Pennsylvania Series and
the Multi-State  Fund will not be residents of or domiciled in the  Commonwealth
of  Pennsylvania;  (iv) the  Pennsylvania  Series  reports to its  investors the
percentage of its income and gain that is attributable to Exempt Obligations and
the percentage of the  Pennsylvania  Series is and at all relevant times will be
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

                  We  have  also  relied  on  an  opinion  of  the  Pennsylvania
Department of Revenue  rendered in connection  with another  matter in which the
Department  of Revenue set forth its policy  that:  (i) a  regulated  investment
company is a separate  entity and the  characteristics  of income  received by a
regulated  investment  company,  to the extent  includable  in its  Pennsylvania
corporate taxable income,  will not flow through to a corporate  investor in the
regulated investment company, and (ii) Exempt-Interest  Dividends, to the extent
excluded  from federal  taxable  income,  are also  excluded  from  Pennsylvania
corporate taxable income.

                  We are opining herein only as to the laws of  Pennsylvania  as
in effect on the date hereof.  Accordingly, we are not opining on, and we assume
no  responsibility  as to, the  applicability to or effect on any of the matters
covered herein of any other laws or the laws of any other jurisdiction.

                  Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
that:

                  1. Individual  shareholders of the Pennsylvania Series who are
subject  to the  Pennsylvania  personal  income  tax,  as  either  residents  or
nonresidents of the  Commonwealth,  (i) will not be subject to the  Pennsylvania
personal income tax on distributions by the Pennsylvania Series of interest that
is  attributable  to  Exempt  Obligations,  and  (ii)  will  be  subject  to the
Pennsylvania  personal income tax on distributions by the Pennsylvania Series of
gains that are attributable to Exempt Obligations issued after February 4, 1994.

<PAGE>

                  2. Corporate  shareholders of the Pennsylvania  Series who are
subject to the Pennsylvania  corporate net income tax will not be subject to the
Pennsylvania  corporate  net income  tax on  distributions  by the  Pennsylvania
Series of interest that is  attributable  to Exempt  Obligations,  provided such
distributions constitute  Exempt-Interest Dividends and are not included in such
shareholders'  federal  taxable  income  determined  before net  operating  loss
carryovers and special  deductions.  Corporate  shareholders of the Pennsylvania
Series who are  subject  to the  Pennsylvania  corporate  net income tax will be
subject to the  Pennsylvania  corporate net income tax on  distributions  by the
Pennsylvania  Series of gains that are attributable to Exempt Obligations issued
after February 4, 1994.

                  3.  Shares  of the  Pennsylvania  Series  that  are  owned  by
investors  who are residents of the  Commonwealth  of  Pennsylvania  will not be
taxable for purposes of the  Pennsylvania  county  personal  property tax to the
extent that the Pennsylvania Series' portfolio consists of Exempt Obligations on
the annual assessment date.  Nonresidents of the Commonwealth are not subject to
the Pennsylvania county personal property tax.

                  4.  Shares  of the  Pennsylvania  Series  that  are  owned  by
investors who are residents of the City of Pittsburgh or the School  District of
Pittsburgh,  or both, will not be taxable for purposes of the City of Pittsburgh
personal  property tax, as the case may be, to the extent that the  Pennsylvania
Series' portfolio consists of Exempt Obligations on the annual assessment date.

                  5. Interest  attributable to Exempt Obligations will be exempt
from the School District of  Philadelphia  investment net income tax in the same
proportion as the Pennsylvania Series is invested in Exempt Obligations.

                  We point  out that the tax  treatment  of  distributions  made
after  February  4, 1994 by the  Pennsylvania  Series of gains  attributable  to
Exempt Obligations issued on or prior to February 4, 1994 (referred to herein as
"Existing  Portfolio Gains") is not entirely free from doubt. A new Pennsylvania
law (Act 68 of 1993  signed  on  December  3,  1993;  the  "Act")  exempts  from
Pennsylvania personal income taxation and Pennsylvania corporate income taxation
all distributions by the Pennsylvania Series of interest  attributable to Exempt
Obligations  for taxable years  beginning on or after  January 1, 1993.  The Act
also  subjects  to  Pennsylvania   personal  income  taxation  and  Pennsylvania
corporate income taxation all distributions by the Pennsylvania  Series of gains
on Exempt Obligations issued after February 4, 1994.

                  We understand that, prior to February 4, 1994 the Pennsylvania
Series  relied on a ruling from the  Pennsylvania  Department of Revenue to pass
through to its  shareholders  the tax-free  character of gains  attributable  to
Exempt Obligations (the "Private Ruling").  As you know, reliance on the Private
Ruling  was  permissible  only if the  Pennsylvania  Series  agreed  to  

<PAGE>

certain  restrictions  described  in the  Private  Ruling  and set  forth in the
Pennsylvania  Series'  governing  instrument  concerning  investments  in Exempt
Obligations.  We understand  that the  Pennsylvania  Series has abandoned  those
investment restrictions as of February 4, 1994.

                  The Act taxes  distributions  of gains  attributable to Exempt
Obligations issued after February 4, 1994. The Private Ruling in effect exempted
from  taxation  gains  distributed  on or prior to  February  4,  1994.  The tax
treatment of Existing Portfolio Gains (i.e., gains distributed after February 4,
1994 on Exempt obligations issued before February 4, 1994),  however, is unclear
now that the Pennsylvania Series no longer abides by the investment restrictions
referred to in the  Private  Ruling.  Under a  conservative  approach,  Existing
Portfolio  Gains would be subject to  Pennsylvania  personal income taxation and
Pennsylvania corporate income taxation,  because the Pennsylvania Series may not
rely on the  Private  Ruling  after  February  4,  1994.  Under  a more  liberal
approach,  Existing  Portfolio Gains, no matter when  distributed,  would not be
subject to  Pennsylvania  personal  income  taxation or  Pennsylvania  corporate
income taxation,  because the Pennsylvania  Series should be able to rely on the
Private  Ruling with respect to its existing  portfolio of assets as of February
4,  1994.  If the  Pennsylvania  Series  desires  certainty  regarding  the  tax
treatment of Existing Portfolio Gains, we recommend that the Pennsylvania Series
obtain a ruling from the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue.

                  Further,  as discussed  above,  the Act subjects gains on U.S.
obligations to Pennsylvania personal income taxation and Pennsylvania  corporate
net income taxation. We point out that under federal law,  obligations,  and the
interest  on such  obligations,  of the  United  States  may not be taxed by any
state. 31 U.S.C. ss. 3124(a). The Supreme Court of the United States in American
Bank and Trust vs. Dallas County, 463 U.S. 855 (1983) interpreted this exception
very  broadly  to extend to every  form of  taxation,  direct or  indirect.  Our
research has found no case that has ruled on the issue of whether  gains on U.S.
obligations may be taxed by a state, and we have made no separate legal analysis
concerning  the effect of American Bank and its progeny on the issue of taxation
of gains on U.S.  obligations.  We understand  that  numerous  states other than
Pennsylvania also impose income taxes on gains on U.S. obligations.  Despite the
apparent  common  practice  by states of taxing  gains on U.S.  obligations,  we
express no opinion  concerning the question  whether  Pennsylvania  is permitted
under federal law to impose income taxes on gains on U.S. obligations due to the
lack of judicial  guidance and the broad  interpretation by the Supreme Court of
the federal  statute  setting forth the  prohibition  on state  taxation of U.S.
obligations.

                  Although you have not  requested  our opinion  concerning  the
application of the Pennsylvania capital stock tax or the Pennsylvania  franchise
tax (72 P.S.  ss.ss.  7601 to 7606),  we point 


<PAGE>

out to you that the  Pennsylvania  Department  of Revenue has taken the position
that  shares of funds  similar to the  Pennsylvania  Series  are not  considered
exempt assets of a corporation  for the purpose of determining its capital stock
value subject to the Commonwealth's  capital stock tax or franchise tax. We also
point out to you that the Pennsylvania  Department of Revenue takes the position
that  interest or premiums  received as a result of  repurchase  agreements  are
taxable for Pennsylvania  income tax purposes on the basis that such interest or
premiums are  attributable  to the  repurchase  loan and not to federal or state
obligations.

                  This opinion is furnished to you  specifically  in  connection
with the Pennsylvania Series and solely for your information and benefit. It may
not be relied on by you in any other connection,  and it may not be relied on by
any other person for any purpose. It may not be assigned, used or quoted without
our prior  written  consent.  We  undertake  no  responsibility  to update  this
opinion.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/Kirkpatrick & Lockhart





                                   LAW OFFICES
                         SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER
                           A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

                                THE ROSS BUILDING
                              801 EAST MAIN STREET
                              POST OFFICE BOX 1998
                          RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23216-1998

                                February 20, 1990


First Investors Management Company, Inc.
120 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

                  Re:  First Investors Multi-State Insured
                       Tax Free Fund (Virginia Series)

Dear Sirs:

         We have acted as your special  Virginia tax counsel in connection  with
the First Investors Multi-State Insured Tax Free Fund (the "Fund") and the First
Investors  Virginia Insured Tax Free Series (the "Virginia  Series") proposed to
be established as a part of the Fund.

         As such counsel, we have examined the Prospectus (the "Prospectus") and
the Statement of Additional Information (the "Statement"),  each relating to the
Virginia  Series and certain  other series of the Fund; we have  considered  the
provisions of applicable  law,  particularly  those of Title 58.1 of the Code of
Virginia  (1950),  as  amended,  dealing  with the  subject of  taxation  in the
Commonwealth of Virginia, and the Individual Income Tax Regulations  promulgated
by the  Virginia  Department  of Taxation  (the  "Department")  thereunder,  and
certain informational bulletins and releases published by the Department; and we
have consulted  informally with certain  Department  personnel.  Based upon such
considerations,  and upon the assumptions set forth below, we are of the opinion
that:

         (a) Interest on exempt obligations  received by the Virginia Series and
         passed through to shareholders in a qualifying distribution, as defined
         in Section 852 of the  Internal  Revenue  Code,  will retain its exempt
         status in the hands of the shareholders,  subject to the qualifications
         set forth in clause (c) below.

                  (b) Exempt  distributions,  for Virginia  personal  income tax
         purposes,  include  distributions  that are exclusively (i) both exempt
         from federal  income  taxation and derived from interest on obligations
         of the  Commonwealth of Virginia or any of its political  subdivisions,
         or (ii)  without  regard to any  exemption  from  federal  income  tax,
         derived  from  obligations  of  a  Virginia  municipality,  commission,
         authority or similar  entity for which a Virginia  income tax exemption
         is independently  provided by the specific enabling  legislation.  Such
         independently  exempt obligations  include,  among others,  obligations
         issued under the Virginia Public Finance Act, certain revenue bonds for
         transportation  facilities,  and  obligations  issued  by the  Virginia
         Housing Development  Authority,  the Virginia Education Loan Authority,
         and industrial development authorities created pursuant to the Virginia
         Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act.

<PAGE>

                  (c) If a  distribution  includes  both taxable and  tax-exempt
         interest,  the  entire  distribution  is  presumed  to be  taxable  for
         Virginia  personal income tax purposes unless the exempt portion can be
         determined with reasonable  certainty and  substantiated.  In published
         pronouncements,  the Department  advises that it generally  requires an
         investor to provide an  allocation  between  taxable and exempt  income
         earned on a monthly  basis,  or in some other  reasonable  manner to be
         provided by the Fund (VR 630-2-322; PD 89-187).

                  (d) As a general rule, to the extent an individual shareholder
         of the Virginia  Series will recognize  capital gain for federal income
         tax  purposes  (whether  as a result of the sale of  securities  by the
         Virginia Series or the sale of securities by the Virginia Series by the
         shareholder), such gain will also be recognized for Virginia income tax
         purposes.  In  certain  instances,  however,  profit  on  the  sale  of
         obligations  is  expressly   exempt  from  Virginia   taxation  by  the
         legislation creating the issuing entity.

                  (e) Interest on indebtedness incurred (directly or indirectly)
         by shareholders to purchase or carry shares of the Virginia Series will
         not be deductible for Virginia income tax purposes.

         In rendering  this  opinion,  we have assumed that the Virginia  Series
intends to qualify and will  continue to be qualified as a regulated  investment
company;  that  distributions  to  shareholders  of the Virginia  Series will be
qualifying distributions as defined in Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code;
and the Fund and the Virginia Series will be operated in the manner described in
the Prospectus and the Statement.

         Except for the Virginia tax disclosure  relating to the Virginia Series
appearing  in the  Prospectus  under the heading  "Taxes,"  and the  information
appearing  in both the  Prospectus  and the  Statement  designated  as  "Special
Considerations  for the  Virginia  Series,"  all having been  prepared by us for
inclusion  therein,  we express no opinion as to the accuracy or adequacy of the
Prospectus or the Statement.


<PAGE>

         Our separate  consent to our designation as Virginia tax counsel to the
Fund, and to the use of a summary of this opinion in the Prospectus is furnished
to you concurrently herewith.

                                                    Respectfully yours,

                                             /s/Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission