NAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC, 10KSB, 1997-03-31

NAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC
10KSB, 1997-03-31
PERSONAL CREDIT INSTITUTIONS

Previous: PRUDENTIAL ALLOCATION FUND, 497, 1997-03-31

Next: WORLDCORP INC, 10-K, 1997-03-31

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB

[ X ] Annual Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996

[ ] Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ________________ __, ____
to ___________________ __, ____

Commission File Number: 0-25476
-------

NAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
------------------------
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Delaware 23-24552194
-------- -----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

500 Cypress Creek Road West
Suite 590
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
---------------------------------------- -----
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number: (305) 938-8200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock $.15 par value
---------------------------
(Title of Class)

Check whether the Registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. (1) Yes X No ___ (2) Yes X No ___
--- ---

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and will not be contained, to
the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ X ]

<PAGE>

Registrant's revenues for the year ended December 31, 1996: $51,127,198.

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates
of the Registrant, as of March 25, 1997, was approximately $26,609,921 based
upon the closing sale price of the Registrant's Common Stock upon The NASDAQ
National Market(SM) of $3.375 per share of Common Stock on such date. See
Footnote (1) below.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's sole class of
Common Stock as of March 25, 1997 was 10,443,395 shares.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one)

Yes No X
---- ----

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None.
- ------------------

(1) The information provided shall in no way be construed as an admission that
any person whose holdings are excluded from the figure is not an affiliate
or that any person whose holdings are included is an affiliate and any such
admission is hereby disclaimed. The information provided is included solely
for recordkeeping purposes of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

<PAGE>

PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, the words "may," "will,"
"expect," "anticipate," "continue," "estimate," "intend," and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements with the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 regarding events, conditions and financial trends which may
affect the Company's future plans of operations, business strategy, operating
results and financial position. Such statements are not guarantees of future
performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results may
differ materially from those included within the forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors. Such factors include, among others: (i) the Company's
liquidity and the ability to finance its operations, including the suspension or
loss of excess servicing cash flows and servicing fees and the repayment of
outstanding debentures; (ii) the ability of the Company to obtain adequate
financing on satisfactory terms, including the ability to continue its
securitization program; (iii) the risks associated with the performance of its
lease and loan contracts, including defaults and prepayments thereof; (iv) the
risks associated with the ability of the Company to estimate the residual value
of its lease contracts; (v) the risks associated with the volatility of the
trading price of the Company's Common Stock; and (vi) the risks associated with
other economic, competitive, governmental and other regulatory factors affecting
the Company's financing, operations, markets and stock price. Additional factors
are described in the Company's other public reports and filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any
revision of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date they are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events.

<PAGE>

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

General

NAL Financial Group Inc. ("NAL" or the "Company") is a specialized
automobile finance company engaged in the purchase, securitization and servicing
of automobile finance contracts ("Contracts") originated by franchised and
select independent dealers ("Dealers") in connection with sales or leases of
used and new automobiles to consumers with non-prime credit. Consumers with
non-prime credit are perceived to be relatively high credit risks due to various
factors, including the manner in which they have handled previous credit, the
absence or limited extent of their prior credit history, and their limited
financial resources. The Company purchases Contracts relating principally to the
"C" credit segment of the automobile finance market. The Company is also engaged
in providing insurance and related products to its Dealers and customers through
its insurance subsidiary, NAL Insurance Services, Inc. ("NIS"). The Company has
a remarketing subsidiary, Performance Cars of South Florida, Inc. ("PCSF"), with
a J.D. Byrider car dealership franchise ("JDBR Franchise"), which provides a
cost-effective means of disposing of some of the Company's repossessed and
off-lease vehicles.

The Company purchases Contracts directly from Dealers through the
programs described below, namely the Dealer Program, Captive Program, Affinity
Program, Correspondent Program, Recourse Program and Wholesale Program (the
"Origination Programs"). See "Origination Sources." Participants in these
Origination Programs offer Contracts to the Company under a variety of
arrangements that allow it to increase the volume of Contracts purchased from
Dealers with whom the Company does not maintain a direct relationship. The
Company's main sources of Contracts are its Dealer Program and its Captive
Program. The Captive Program includes the Company's arrangements with Special
Finance, Inc. ("SFI"), which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company in
June 1996. Under its Affinity Program, the Company has an agreement with General
Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. ("GECAL") to purchase non-prime lease
Contracts through GECAL's network of Dealers in the Southeast region of the
United States. As of December 31, 1996, the Company's servicing portfolio
consisted of Contracts purchased through its Dealer Program (26%), Captive
Program (52%), Affinity Program (10%), Correspondent Program (2%), Recourse
Program (4%) and Wholesale Program (6%). Each of these programs, other than the
Recourse Program, is designed to purchase Contracts relating primarily to the
"C" credit segment of the market. The Recourse Program is designed to purchase
Contracts relating to the "D" credit segment.

The Company has experienced significant growth in its portfolio of
purchased and serviced Contracts since June 1994, when the acquisition of
Contracts became the principal focus of its business. Total Contracts purchased,
which includes both loan contracts ("Loan Contracts") and lease contracts
("Lease Contracts"), increased from approximately $28.1 million through December
31, 1994 and $165.7 million through December 31, 1995, to approximately $303.6
million through December 31, 1996. As a result, the Company's servicing
portfolio increased from approximately $44.4 million at December 31, 1994 and
$153.8 million at December 31, 1995, to approximately $335.9 million at December
31, 1996. The Company's overall growth during this period was attributable to an
increase in the Company's Dealer relationships from 909 Dealers at December 31,
1995 to 2,122 Dealers at December 31, 1996, and an expansion of the sources and
amounts of financing available to purchase Contracts. The Company currently
purchases Contracts from Dealers in 23 states, with a major

<PAGE>

concentration in Florida. More than 98% of all Contracts acquired by the Company
during the year ended December 31, 1996 were originated by franchised Dealers.

The Company has historically funded the purchase of its Contracts with
borrowings from banks and other lenders. Currently, the Company's primary
financing sources include a $100 million warehouse facility, $45 million of
revolving credit facilities, including a $25 million facility with General
Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC"), and a specialized borrowing facility.
Beginning in December 1995, the Company began securitizing the majority of its
portfolio of Loan Contracts to increase the Company's liquidity, provide for the
redeployment of capital, reduce risks associated with interest rate fluctuations
and provide the Company with access to a cost-effective, diversified source of
financing. During the last six fiscal quarters, the Company completed
securitization transactions aggregating approximately $370.8 million. During
this period, gains on sale from the securitization transactions have constituted
the principal source of the Company's revenues. The Company plans to continue to
employ its securitization program as an integral component of its funding
strategy and anticipates that it will generally complete securitization
transactions on a quarterly basis. The Company also generates revenues from
interest income and fees earned on Contracts held in portfolio, as well as
servicing fees from Loan Contracts sold in securitization transactions. In
addition, the Company receives revenues from the sale of insurance and related
products through its insurance subsidiary, NIS.

NAL was founded in February 1991 as a specialized consumer finance
company. It became publicly held by virtue of a merger (the "Merger") on
November 30, 1994 with a previously inactive public company which was
incorporated in Delaware on November 14, 1986. Effective upon completion of the
Merger, the Company assumed the historic operations of NAL and changed its name
to "NAL Financial Group Inc." The Company operates its business through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries: NAL Acceptance Corporation ("NAC"); NIS; PCSF; SFI;
Autorics, Inc., and Autoric II, Inc. Unless the context otherwise requires, the
"Company" or "NAL" refers to NAL Financial Group Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries.

Because of the opportunities presented by the insolvency and
reorganization of many financial institutions at the time, the Company's
principal activities until the second quarter of 1994 involved the bulk purchase
and servicing of seasoned and non-performing portfolios of consumer and mortgage
loans and automobile lease receivables that had been administered by the
Resolution Trust Corporation or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The
principal focus of the Company's business since June 1994 has shifted to the
purchase and servicing of automobile Loan and Lease Contracts originated by
Dealers in connection with the sale or lease of automobiles to consumers with
non-prime credit.

Business Strategy

The Company's business is to purchase, securitize and service non-prime
Loan and Lease Contracts through its Origination Programs. The Company's
principal objectives are to sustain controlled growth of its business and to
maximize its profit potential. To achieve these objectives, the Company is
currently employing the following key strategies:

Expanding and Strengthening Relationships with Origination
Sources. The Company plans to achieve a greater volume of business by
expanding its origination sources in existing markets, entering into new
geographic markets and strengthening current relationships. The Company
plans to expand its origination sources through strategic arrangements
with independent entities and relationships with individual Dealers and
networks of Dealers. The Company develops strong relationships with its
Dealers and other origination sources by

<PAGE>

providing a high level of service specifically tailored to meet their
needs. The Company typically responds to credit applications on the date
received, and in most cases, within two to four hours, and generally
pays the Dealer for Contracts purchased within twenty-four hours of
receipt of a complete funding package. In addition, the Company provides
training to Dealer personnel on the use of the Company's credit
underwriting and pricing guidelines.

Providing Diverse Products and Services to Dealers. In addition
to providing prompt, flexible service and a reliable source of
financing, the Company increases its volume of business from Dealers by
offering a "one-stop shop" service. This service includes purchasing
both Loan and Lease Contracts on used and new automobiles from a broad
range of credit profiles and offering insurance and related products.

Employing Detailed Underwriting Guidelines. In order to evaluate
and measure the risks associated with lending to consumers with
non-prime credit, the Company uses multi-tiered credit underwriting and
pricing guidelines for purchasing both Loan and Lease Contracts. These
guidelines balance, among other factors, the creditworthiness of the
borrower with the adequacy of the vehicle as collateral. These
guidelines are designed to enable Dealers to: (i) assess a borrower's
credit risk category; (ii) determine the maximum term of the loan or
lease for used and new automobiles; (iii) calculate the maximum payment
affordable by the borrower; and (iv) estimate their profit from selling
the Contracts to the Company.

Maintaining Effective Collection and Asset Disposition Systems.
To minimize delinquencies and losses, the Company employs aggressive
collection policies and procedures which typically include contacting a
borrower within 24 hours of a payment delinquency and managing accounts
based on geographic regions. In addition, the Company uses its
subsidiary, PCSF, and its JDBR Franchise, to maximize its recovery on
some of its repossessed and off-lease vehicles by providing an alternate
means of disposition. As geographic expansion requires, the Company
intends to establish regional centers. The Company has opened regional
centers in Orlando, Florida and Atlanta, Georgia.

Diversifying its Financing Sources. The Company plans to continue
to expand and diversify its financing sources, and to increase the
amount of financing available. The Company intends to continue to
securitize its Loan Contracts on a quarterly basis. Current financing
sources include a $100 million warehouse facility, $45 million of
revolving credit facilities, including the $25 million facility with
GECC (the "GECC Facility"), a securitization program and a specialized
borrowing facility.

Continuing the Growth of Related Businesses. The Company's
related businesses, through NIS and PCSF complement the purchasing and
servicing of Loan and Lease Contracts and enhance the Company's
profitability. For the year ended December 31, 1996, NIS generated
revenues of $2.9 million. The Company plans to continue to market its
insurance and related products to its Dealers and customers. For the
year ended December 31, 1996, PCSF generated revenues of $1 million. As
the volume of Contracts purchased increases, the Company plans to open
additional PCSF sites with JDBR Franchises in Georgia and other markets.
The Company is negotiating the acquisition a JDBR Franchise in Atlanta,
Georgia.

Recruiting and Retaining Experienced Management. Members of the
Company's management team have an average of over 20 years of experience
in automobile finance, consumer finance or banking. Management believes
that hiring experienced management

<PAGE>

personnel is critical to the formulation and implementation of its
strategies and the maintenance of its growth and profitability. The
Company intends to continue to provide incentive compensation
arrangements, including stock option plans, to retain members of the
management team.

Business

The Company's lines of business include the purchase, securitization and
servicing of Loan and Lease Contracts on used and new automobiles relating to
consumers with non-prime credit from Dealers and other origination sources, and
the sale of insurance and related products to its customers directly and through
Dealers.

Loan Contracts

The following table provides certain material information relative to
the Loan Contracts acquired by the Company during each of the last eight
quarters.

For the Quarters Ended
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dec 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996 1995 1995 1995 1995
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
(Dollars in thousands)

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Loans:(1)
Contracts purchased $77,898 $69,556 $50,971 $48,326 $46,593 $31,624 $21,364 $18,785
Weighted average
Contract amount $ 12.1 $ 12.3 $ 12.3 $ 12.1 $ 12.5 $ 12.0 $ 11.2 $ 12.2
Weighted average initial
term (months) 54.0 54.4 53.6 56.1 53.0 51.1 48.0 42.8
Weighted average APR 19.50% 19.50% 19.33% 19.60% 19.35% 19.90% 20.56% 19.05%
Weighted average discount 8.75% 8.24% 4.21% 4.73% 5.53% 5.93% 5.26% 4.82%
Percentage of Contracts
secured by new vehicles 12.56% 19.61% 29.72% 38.39% 34.62% 31.05% 21.30% 18.43%
Percentage of Contracts
secured by used vehicles 87.44% 80.39% 70.28% 61.61% 65.38% 68.95% 78.70% 81.57%
</TABLE>

- ---------------
(1) Excludes Loan Contracts purchased under the Company's Recourse
Program.

The Company purchases Loan Contracts, which are secured by used and new
automobiles, from diverse sources through its Origination Programs. Loan
Contracts relate to borrowers which, according to the Company's underwriting
guidelines, fall within the "C" credit segment of the automobile finance market,
except in the case of its Recourse Program which is designed for "D" credit
borrowers. Contracts generally have terms of 36 to 60 months and carry interest
rates ranging from 16% to 30% per year. A majority of the loans are based on the
Rule of 78's method; however, a small portion are simple interest loans and
actuarial loans.

The Company purchases Loan Contracts at discounts to the face amount.
The discounts are nonrefundable and vary depending upon the credit category of
the borrower, as determined by the Company's underwriting guidelines, and any
special arrangements between the Company and the origination source. In addition
to the discount, the Company generally charges an administration fee. The
purchase price of Loan Contracts are, therefore, reduced from their face amounts
by both the discount and the administration fee. The purchase price of Loan
Contracts generally range from 110% to 120% of the collateral value of the
underlying vehicle, except in the case of the Recourse Program where

<PAGE>

it ranges from 60% to 75% of the principal amount of the Loan Contracts, which
approximates the value of the vehicle.

The Company purchases Loan Contracts in 23 states with a concentration
in Florida (42% of the Company's Loan portfolio as of December 31, 1996). The
average size of Loan Contracts acquired for the year ended December 31, 1996 was
$12,200. The Company finances Loan Contracts on both a floating and fixed rate
basis through its credit facilities. The Company has sold, for the last five
quarters, a substantial majority of its Loan Contracts through securitization
transactions and services all Loan Contracts, including those sold through
securitization transactions.

In the event of a default by a borrower, the Company repossesses the
vehicle and remarkets the vehicle through one of the following four channels:
(i) wholesale auctions; (ii) on a wholesale basis through the Company's
subsidiary, PCSF; (iii) on a retail basis through the Company's subsidiary,
PCSF; or (iv) on a retail basis through the JDBR Franchise, depending on, among
other factors, the age and condition of the vehicle. To the extent that the net
proceeds from remarketing a vehicle exceed the Company's book value of the Loan
Contract, the Company recognizes a gain, and, to the extent such net proceeds
are less, the Company recognizes a loss. As a result, employing an efficient
remarketing channel for repossessed vehicles is an important aspect of the
Company's operations.

Lease Contracts

The following table provides certain material information relative to
the Lease Contracts acquired by the Company during each of the last eight
quarters.

For the Quarters Ended
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996 1995 1995 1995 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Leases:
Contracts purchased $ 10,157 $ 6,776 $ 3,609 $ 3,686 $ 3,989 $ 4,085 $ 5,241 $ 6,733
Weighted average
Contract amount $ 14.6 $ 15.9 $ 15.9 $ 15.8 $ 16.8 $ 16.5 $ 17.2 $ 20.2
Weighted average initial
term (months) 46.6 45.8 44.9 45.3 43.1 45.2 42.8 39.0
Weighted average yield 18.39% 17.93% 18.03% 18.36% 17.50% 18.09% 17.62% 14.49%
Percentage of Contracts
secured by new vehicles 35.54% 40.47% 43.61% 41.63% 54.43% 64.92% 67.11% 64.67%
Percentage of Contracts
secured by used vehicles 64.46% 59.53% 56.39% 58.37% 45.57% 35.08% 32.89% 35.33%
</TABLE>

The Company purchases substantially all of its Lease Contracts from its
Dealer Program and Affinity Program. Generally, Lease Contracts involve
customers with better credit than customers relating to Loan Contracts. Lease
Contracts relate to many makes and models of both used and new vehicles. As of
December 31, 1996, the Company's lease portfolio consisted of 57% new
automobiles and 43% used automobiles. The Leases are closed-end leases and
generally have terms of 24 to 60 months. A vast majority of the Lease Contracts
are amortized according to an interest method. The Lease Contracts also require
that the lessee pay all fees and expenses relating to the use and maintenance of
the vehicle.

The Company purchases Lease Contracts from its origination sources at
the implied principal amount of the Lease less an administration fee. The
administration fee is nonrefundable and varies depending upon the credit
category of the borrower, as determined by the Company's underwriting
guidelines, and any special arrangements between the Company and the origination
source. The

<PAGE>

purchase price of the Lease Contract ranges from 110% to 120% of the collateral
value of the underlying vehicle.

The Company purchases Lease Contracts in 23 states with a concentration
in Florida (65% of the Company's Lease portfolio as of December 31, 1996). The
average size of Lease Contracts is $17,600 for new automobiles and $14,400 for
used automobiles. The Company primarily uses its GECC Facility to finance its
Lease Contracts. Under this facility, GECC provides fixed-rate financing for the
full term of the Lease Contract and generally advances 90% or more of the
Company's investment in the Lease Contract. The Company currently holds all
Lease Contracts on its books and services them for their full term.

The Company purchases both direct finance leases and operating leases,
with the vast majority of the Lease Contracts being direct finance leases.
Generally, Lease Contracts having a term in excess of 48 months are classified
as direct finance leases, and Lease Contracts having a term of less than 48
months are classified as operating leases. The Company's sources of revenues
from Lease Contracts include: (i) an administration fee; (ii) interest income in
the case of direct finance leases and rental revenue in the case of operating
leases; and (iii) proceeds from the sale of the vehicle in excess of the
Residual Value at the end of the lease term.

In establishing the amount of the lease payments, the Company makes an
estimate of the Residual Value of the vehicle at the end of the lease term. The
Company's ability to realize proceeds approximating the Residual Value will be
substantially determined by the accuracy of the Residual Value previously
estimated and the Company's ability to effectively remarket its off-lease
vehicles. The Company uses Automobile Leasing Guide guidelines in estimating the
Residual Value, which are based on, among other things, the lease term, the
vehicle's make and model, the vehicle's remarketing and mechanical history, new
automobile price increases for the model and how the vehicle is equipped.

The Company, or the originating dealer, remarkets the vehicle at the end
of the lease term by attempting to sell the vehicle to the lessee. In the event
that the lessee does not purchase the vehicle, the Company remarkets the vehicle
through the same channels it uses for the disposition of its repossessed
vehicles under its loan program, which include wholesale auctions and the
Company's subsidiary, PCSF, and its JDBR Franchise. To the extent the proceeds
from remarketing a vehicle exceed the Residual Value of the vehicle, the Company
recognizes a gain, and, to the extent such proceeds are less than the Residual
Value, the Company recognizes a loss. As a result, the estimation of the
Residual Value at lease inception is an important aspect of the Company's
operations. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had a Residual Value exposure
of approximately $20.4 million, representing an average of 34% of the original
aggregate gross Lease Contracts receivable. Management believes that it
adequately reserves against exposure to risks associated with realizing the
underlying Residual Value. See "ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS."

In the event of an early termination of the Lease or default by the
lessee, the lessee is generally obligated to pay the remaining payments due
under the Lease, plus the Residual Value, less any unearned lease income
calculated using the Rule of 78's method, and less the proceeds received from
the disposition of the vehicle.

<PAGE>

Sales and Marketing

The Company focuses its sales and marketing efforts on developing strong
relationships with Dealers and expanding and diversifying its other origination
sources. Since Dealers represent the Company's primary source of Contracts
through the Company's Dealer Program and through SFI, the Company's sales and
marketing team focuses on increasing the number of Contracts purchased from
existing Dealers and developing relationships with new Dealers.
Management believes that it increases its Contract volume from Dealers by
providing both Loan and Lease financing alternatives and insurance and related
products. The Company develops strong relationships with its Dealers by
providing a high level of service specifically tailored to meet their needs. The
Company offers its Dealers fast turnaround of Contract approval and funding,
consistent and detailed credit underwriting and pricing guidelines and feedback
on the performance of their portfolios. The Company's offices are open six days
a week, plus sales and marketing personnel attend dealer-sponsored promotional
sales events to provide "on-site" financing approval. The Company's regional
sales representatives and senior management maintain an ongoing dialogue with
Dealers to enhance relationships.

The Company solicits business from Dealers through its sales and
marketing team, which principally consists of regional managers, area sales
managers and dealer service representatives. As of December 31, 1996, the sales
and marketing teams, including the staff of SFI, had 73 members. Each regional
sales manager manages approximately 6 area sales managers. The regional sales
managers, in conjunction with area sales managers, are responsible for
maintaining and expanding existing Dealer relationships and developing new
Dealer relationships, including educating Dealer personnel in the area of
non-prime automobile finance.

Origination Sources

The Company purchases Contracts directly from Dealers through its Dealer
Program and through select third-party entities that participate in its other
Origination Programs. Although the Dealer Program and the Captive Program are
the primary sources of Contracts, the other programs offer the Company the
opportunity to purchase Contracts with a minimal increase in sales and marketing
costs.

Dealer Program. In its Dealer Program, the Company enters into a
non-exclusive agreement with a Dealer, under which the Company purchases Loan
and Lease Contracts originated by the Dealer in accordance with the Company's
underwriting guidelines and procedures. Under this program, a Dealer submits
loan and lease applications that it believes would satisfy the Company's
underwriting guidelines. The Company applies its underwriting guidelines and
procedures to determine whether to approve or decline the applications. If the
Company approves an application, it will seek to purchase the Contract. The
Company's sales and marketing team establishes and maintains direct
relationships with Dealers, and when necessary, a member of the team works with
the Dealer throughout every stage of the application approval and the Contract
purchase process.

As of December 31, 1996, the Company purchased Contracts through its
Dealer Program in 23 states with concentrations in Florida (34%), Georgia (11%),
Louisiana (23%) and North Carolina (20%). For the year ended December 31, 1996,
the Dealer Program generated a volume of 5,646 Contracts, which represented 21%
of the Contracts purchased during the period.

Captive Program. In its Captive Program, the Company enters into an
exclusive agreement with an entity (the "Captive") whereby the Captive
originates, through its Dealer relationships, Loan and Lease Contracts in
accordance with the Company's underwriting guidelines; and the Company has the

<PAGE>

right of first refusal to purchase such Contracts. Under this program, the
Captive submits the Contracts and the Company verifies that each Contract meets
its underwriting guidelines prior to the purchase of such Contracts.

The Company currently has two Captive relationships, one with SFI and
the other with First Financial Acceptance, Inc. ("FFA"), a company which
originates Contracts exclusively from a network of Dealers who have ownership
interests in FFA.

SFI is the successor to the assets of Special Finance, Inc. ("PSFI"), a
Florida based finance company founded in 1987. SFI is engaged in originating and
selling non-prime automobile Loan Contracts. From September 1994 to August 1995,
the Company purchased Loan Contracts originated by PFSI with an aggregate volume
of $41.7 million. In August 1995, the Company entered into an exclusive
agreement with PSFI under its Captive Program, to originate, through PSFI's
dealer relationships, Loan Contracts in accordance with the Company's
underwriting guidelines, and the Company had the right of first refusal to
purchase such Contracts. In June 1996, the Company acquired the assets of PSFI
(including the name Special Finance, Inc), and created a wholly-owned subsidiary
to operate those assets under the name Special Finance, Inc. The Company entered
into a management agreement with the former principals of PSFI and retained
substantially all of the operating personnel of PSFI. SFI has continued to
operate the assets consistent with PSFI's historic practice and the Company has
accounted for the origination of Loan Contracts by SFI as part of its Captive
Program through December 31, 1996. SFI continues to maintain a strong
relationship with Dealers in coordination with the Company's own Dealer
relationships.

SFI has originated under the Captive Program an increasing volume of
Loan Contracts. During the period from October 1, 1994 to December 31, 1996, the
Company purchased an aggregate volume of $221.5 million of Loan Contracts
through PSFI / SFI, representing approximately 52% of the total volume of Loan
Contracts purchased by the Company during this period through all of its
Origination Programs. For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company's
Captive Program generated a volume of 13,324 Contracts, which represents 50% of
the Contracts purchased during the period.

Effective January 1, 1997, the Company integrated its program
with SFI into the Company's Dealer Program. As part of this process, the Company
is currently evaluating the operations of SFI to identify any redundancies in
order to reduce overall expenses. The Company expects to complete the
integration of SFI during 1997.

Affinity Program. In its Affinity Program, the Company enters into an
agreement with an independent entity (the "Affinity") which typically lends to
consumers with "A" and "B" credit. Under this program, the Affinity originates,
through its Dealer relationships, Loan and Lease Contracts that do not meet its
own underwriting guidelines but may satisfy the Company's underwriting
guidelines. The Company has the right of first refusal to purchase such
Contracts. The Affinity submits such Loan and Lease applications, and the
Company applies its underwriting guidelines and procedures to determine whether
to approve or decline the applications. Upon approval, the Company purchases the
Contract. The purpose of this program is primarily to develop strategic
relationships with third-party financing sources that do not otherwise finance
consumers with non-prime credit.

The Company currently has three Affinity relationships. One of the
relationships is with GECAL, an affiliate of GECC. In July 1995, the Company
entered into a two-year agreement, automatically renewable for successive
one-year periods thereafter, under which the Company is given the opportunity to
evaluate all applications that do not meet GECAL's underwriting criteria. The

<PAGE>

Company, utilizing its underwriting guidelines, then approves or declines the
submissions. While not an exclusive arrangement, management believes that the
Company continues to be the only non-prime company operating this program with
GECAL in the Southeast. The program currently includes all of GECAL's dealers in
Florida.

For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Affinity Program generated a
volume of 1,557 Contracts, which represented 6% of the Contracts purchased
during the period.

Correspondent Program. In its Correspondent Program, the Company enters
into an agreement with an independent entity (the "Correspondent") whereby the
Correspondent originates, through its Dealer relationships, Loan Contracts that
the Correspondent believes would satisfy the Company's underwriting guidelines;
the Company does not, however, have the right of first refusal to purchase such
Contracts. The Company applies its underwriting guidelines and procedures to
determine whether to approve or decline such applications. Upon approval, the
Company purchases the Contracts.

The Company currently has four Correspondent relationships. During the
year ended December 31, 1996, the Correspondent Program generated a volume of
540 Contracts, which represented 2% of the Contracts purchased during the
period.

Recourse Program. In its Recourse Program, the Company enters into an
arrangement with an independent entity (the "Originating Entity") that
originates, through its Dealer relationships, Loan Contracts that meet
pre-established credit criteria; and the Company purchases such Contracts with
full recourse to the Originating Entity. The Company accounts for the
arrangement as a financing to the Originating Entity. Under this program, the
Originating Entity submits the Contracts, and the Company verifies that each
Contract meets the pre-established credit criteria prior to the purchase of such
Contract. The Company purchases the Contracts typically at 60% to 75% of the
principal amount of the Contracts. The pre-established credit criteria generally
relate to "D" credit borrowers.

The Company currently has two Recourse relationships. Management
believes that the Recourse Program offers the Company the opportunity to
purchase Contracts outside its "C" credit target market and, at the same time,
to mitigate the credit risk through a large discount and full recourse. The
advance rate is determined based upon the credit of the Originating Entity and
the value of the underlying collateral. For the year ended December 31, 1996,
the Recourse Program generated a volume of 4,090 Contracts, which represented
15% of the Contracts purchased during the period.

Wholesale Program. The Company engages in opportunistic purchases of
portfolios of Loan Contracts that meet the Company's underwriting guidelines and
Contract documentation requirements. The Company purchases such portfolios at a
discount and subject to verification that: (i) a sample of the Contracts,
typically 10% to 15% of the portfolio, complies with the Company's underwriting
guidelines; and (ii) each Loan Contract in the portfolio satisfies the
documentation requirements of the Company.

For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company purchased one $15
million portfolio of Contracts as part of its Wholesale Program.

<PAGE>

Underwriting

The Company evaluates and purchases Loan and Lease Contracts in
accordance with its underwriting guidelines and procedures. The underwriting
guidelines focus on balancing the credit risk of the borrower or lessee with the
adequacy of the vehicle as collateral, as well as the purchase price of the
Contract on a case-by-case basis. The underwriting procedure focuses upon
ensuring the compliance of the Contract with the underwriting guidelines, the
completeness of the documentation required for the Contract and the timely
response of the Company's decision to the entity submitting the Contract (the
"Originator").

Underwriting Guidelines. The Company's basic criteria for assessing
credit risk takes into account principally the following factors: (i) Stability:
the applicant's history with regard to his or her residency, occupation and
employment; (ii) Credit History: the applicant's history with regard to timely
payments on his or her past and present obligations, defaults, bankruptcies and
repossessions; (iii) Affordability: a monthly debt service-to-gross income ratio
test not to exceed 50%, and a monthly payment not to exceed 20% of the monthly
gross income; (iv) Risk Exposure: the ratio of the principal amount of the
Contract net of the purchase discount and the administration fee to the market
value of the vehicle; and (v) Downpayment: the downpayment on the vehicle, which
is generally a minimum of 10% of the vehicle's sale price. The Company's
underwriting guidelines also incorporate certain criteria for the vehicle
underlying the Loan or Lease Contract, the maximum term of the Loan or Lease
Contract and the level of discount and administration fee required for the
purchase of such Contract.

Management believes that gradations exist with respect to the credit
profiles of non-prime consumers in the automobile finance market according to
the above generalized factors. The Company's underwriting guidelines provide for
three tiers of credit profiles: preferred, standard, and first time buyer (the
"Multi-tiered Underwriting Guidelines"). Furthermore, the Company believes that
its Multi-tiered Underwriting Guidelines provide a greater degree of specificity
to the Originator than its competition in assessing the credit risk of, and
developing the financing terms for, the applicant, enhancing the rapid execution
of the transaction for the Originator and enabling the Originator to provide
improved service to its customers.

Underwriting Procedure. The Company has an underwriting department with
an underwriting staff which is organized into teams based upon geographic
regions. Each team consists of a processor, a credit analyst, a funder and a
senior funder. Management believes that this regional team approach promotes
efficient communication and expedites the underwriting process, giving the
Company a competitive edge while maintaining consistent underwriting
performance. As geographic expansion requires, the Company intends to establish
full service regional centers which will include an underwriting department. The
underwriting procedure consists of three steps: Step I - Application Processing,
Step II - Credit Review, and Step III - Contract Funding, as described below.

STEP I - Application Processing: Upon receipt of an application from an
Originator, the processor enters the information into the Company's computer
system, which automatically provides for the tracking and processing of the
application. The application sets forth, among other things, the applicant's
income, liabilities, credit and employment history, proposed downpayment and a
description of the vehicle. Simultaneously with the processing of the
application, the processor obtains credit reports from Equifax, TransUnion
and/or TRW through its computer system, and immediately proceeds to: (i) verify
the employment of the applicant and his or her spouse/co-signer, if applicable,
with their respective employers; (ii) verify credit references, if applicable;
(iii) verify current residence and duration of current and past residence;
(iv) verify and evaluate the value of the vehicle as collateral

<PAGE>

through the use of the "Black Book" or NADA Book, as appropriate; and (v) review
a budget screen automatically produced by the computer system, which estimates
funds the applicant will have available for paying his or her monthly payment.
Once this process is completed, the application is passed on-line to the team's
credit analyst.

STEP II - Credit Review: The credit analyst reviews the application and
evaluates the applicant's credit risk with respect to the Company's Multi-tiered
Underwriting Guidelines. Regardless of the decision on the application, the
credit analyst will promptly respond to the Originator, typically within two to
four hours of receipt of the application, indicating that the application is
approved with or without stipulations, or declined. If the application is
declined, the credit analyst will give a detailed explanation as to what
circumstances dictated the rejection of the application and what, if any,
changes could be made in order to make a subsequent application more likely to
be approved. Typical items that the Company might require to be amended include
proving additional income, requiring a co-applicant, amending the length of the
proposed term, requiring additional downpayment, substantiating credit
information and requiring proof of the resolution of certain credit deficiencies
as noted on the customer's credit history. Approximately 36% of applications are
approved or conditionally approved, of which approximately 21% are ultimately
funded. Management believes that this direct contact between the credit analyst
and the Originator and the development of a relationship over time results in a
better understanding by the Originator of the underwriting guidelines and leads
to more accurate pre-screening by the Originator of applicants and higher
approval rates of Contracts.

STEP III - Contract Funding: If the credit analyst approves the
application, the Originator provides a funding package to the Company, which
includes legal documentation and the credit information. Upon receipt by the
Company, the funding package is referred to the team's funder. At that time, all
information concerning the funding package, including both legal documentation
and credit, are reverified by the funder. Any deficiencies are noted, and the
Originator is advised. The funder works directly with the Originator to complete
the funding package. While the funding package is being processed, the team's
interviewer conducts a customer telephone interview with the applicant to verify
the information provided in the application and the funding package. The
telephone interview with the applicant typically concentrates on verifying the
downpayment, the monthly payment amount, the payment due date, the Dealer
add-ons, and the make, model and mileage of the vehicle. If there are any
discrepancies, the file is referred back to the credit analyst who then contacts
the Originator and/or the applicant to see if the discrepancy is capable of
being resolved. If the problem is not capable of being resolved, the application
is terminated, and the file is returned to the dealer/originator.

Prior to final approval for funding the Contract, the computer system
automatically verifies the Contract information, such as the APR, verifies the
proceeds to be distributed to the Originator and alerts the funder to any
discrepancies between the calculations automatically performed by the computer
system and the information included in the funding package. Prior to issuance of
a check to the Originator, the team's senior funder reviews the entire funding
package including any discrepancies between the computer analysis and the
funding package, verifies the completeness of the legal and credit
documentation, confirms that the applicant has adequate insurance as verified by
NIS (see "NAL Insurance Services, Inc.") and that the telephone interview was
successfully completed. After approval by the senior funder, the Contract is
referred to the accounting department and the funds are delivered to the
Originator by check or wire transfer. The Company typically funds within 24
hours of receipt of a properly completed funding package.

Underwriting for Origination Programs. The Company applies the
Multi-tiered Underwriting Guidelines to each of the Origination Programs, except
in the case of the Recourse Program. The

<PAGE>

underwriting and pricing guidelines for the Recourse Program are pre-agreed upon
between the Originator of the Contracts under this program and the Company. The
terms of the Contract are based upon, among other factors, the credit history of
the borrower or lessee and the value of the underlying collateral. The Company
also applies its underwriting procedure to each of the Origination Programs as
appropriate, except in the case of the Wholesale Program. The underwriting
procedure for the Wholesale Program involves evaluating the overall quality of
the portfolio for compliance with the Company's underwriting guidelines based
upon a sample review of generally 10% to 15% of the Contracts in the portfolio
prior to purchase. In addition, the Company conducts a documentation review of
each Contract in the portfolio for accuracy and completeness prior to purchasing
the portfolio.

Quality Control

The Company's quality control group conducts a post-funding credit
review of its Contracts on a monthly basis. The staff reviews all of the
Contract files for completeness of documentation. The staff also conducts a
credit review of approximately 15% to 20% of the Contracts purchased each month
to determine whether the Contracts comply with the Company's underwriting
guidelines and procedures and records the nature and frequency of all exceptions
that were approved. In the event that a Contract contains unapproved exceptions
to the Company's underwriting guidelines, it is referred to management for
resolution. The quality control group also performs a monthly trend analysis to
determine whether any adjustments should be made to the Company's underwriting
guidelines based upon recurring approved exceptions and the performance of
Contracts with these exceptions.

Asset Servicing and Collections

The Company has a servicing and collections operation that utilizes
experienced staff and computer technology and software tailored to the Company's
specific needs. Servicing and collections functions are organized into
departments, which consist principally of Customer Service, Collections,
Repossession, Asset Management and Disposition, and Asset Recovery. To minimize
losses and delinquencies, the Company: (i) employs pro-active collection
policies and procedures based upon each collector managing the contract from
origination to settlement; (ii) manages the accounts based upon geographic
regions; (iii) employs experienced personnel with proven expertise whose
performance is continuously evaluated and rewarded based upon performance of the
Contracts serviced; and (iv) utilizes servicing and collection specialists to
provide technical expertise, as required, to address specific circumstances.

Customer Service. The Company's customer service department is
responsible for resolving customer problems, quoting customer pay-off amounts,
arranging substitutions of collateral, re-leasing vehicles at lease-end and
processing customer payments.

The Company also uses its customer service department to enhance the
efficiency of its account management by routing all incoming calls through the
collection department. Management believes that this procedure promotes
efficient account management through continuous updating of information prior to
the provision of other services to the customer. The Company facilitates
collections from customers by using Western Union "Quick Collect," which allows
a customer to make payments at numerous locations. The Company also accepts
walk-in payments. However, any delinquent customer making a walk-in payment must
be interviewed by a collector.

Collections. The collectors are organized into five regions consisting
of South Florida, North Florida, East Coast states, Central states and West
Coast states. Within each region, the collectors are

<PAGE>

organized into teams of four, which include three collectors and a team leader.
Management believes that this regional team approach enables the Company to
identify and efficiently tailor its servicing and collection activities to each
region, and permits accounts to be monitored more closely by management, thereby
enhancing collector performance and minimizing delinquencies and losses. The
collections staff has 62 persons, including collectors and collection
specialists, and management. As the volume of Contracts increases, the Company
continues to expand to maintain its collection and servicing staff at a level
that provides for approximately one collector for every 500 Contracts serviced.
As geographic expansion requires, the Company intends to establish regional
centers which will include asset servicing and collections departments. The
Company has opened regional centers in Orlando, Florida and Atlanta, Georgia.
See "ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES."

Collection Procedures. The collections staff uses its management
information systems to process and track the accounts in order to ensure that
data is immediately available for continuous evaluation and collection of
accounts. See "Management Information Systems." Within 24 hours of a
delinquency, a collector will telephone the customer to resolve the delinquency.
If the collector fails to reach the customer, the collector attempts to contact
the customer by calling the customer's employers and credit references. If the
delinquency is not resolved, the collector will send demand letters as
appropriate. The Company's policy permits Contracts to be extended or revised
payment schedules to be made no more than once a year on a case-by-case basis,
as determined by its collection supervisors. In the event that the delinquency
cannot be resolved, the collector typically recommends repossession within 45
days. Authorization for repossession typically requires the approval of the
collector, the team leader and the team supervisor. Management believes that
this team approach prevents premature repossession and prevents the collector
from improving the delinquency experience of his or her accounts through
repossession by terminating his or her responsibility for the account. Accounts
that are approved for repossession are turned over to outside agencies for
repossession. Repossession is typically accomplished within 72 hours of
repossession approval, and the vehicle is assigned to the Company's asset
management staff. See "Asset Management and Disposition."

Collector Training and Incentives. The Company's servicing and
collection program emphasizes continuous evaluation and training of its
collection staff plus a bonus compensation system for collectors, supervisors
and managers that rewards efficient management of accounts. The performance of
each collector's accounts is available on a daily basis. The performance and
compensation of the collector is evaluated on a monthly basis. The evaluations
and the bonus program are based upon a rating system that encompasses individual
delinquency rates, team delinquency rates, the delinquency mix, the repossession
rate and the volume of calls handled. Management believes that this incentive
compensation system motivates employees to effectively manage accounts, thus
increasing collections and minimizing delinquencies and losses.

Collection Specialists. The Company supports its collection teams by
providing collection specialists in the areas of bankruptcy, insurance claims,
skip-tracing and repossession. In the event that an account involves bankruptcy
issues, insurance issues, skip-tracing or repossession, the account remains the
responsibility of the collector, and a collection specialist in the relevant
area works with the collector providing technical expertise in order to use
efficiently the collector's time, maximize collections and minimize delinquency
and loss. The collector does not relinquish care, control or custody of the
account until the account is terminated by payment in full, repossession or is
charged off and assigned to the asset recovery department. Management believes
that the origination-to-settlement servicing approach (rather than a "roll-up"
approach that routes the account to different collectors as the

<PAGE>

account ages) provides continuity and enhances the accountability of the
collector for the performance of the accounts serviced.

Repossession. The Company's repossession department is responsible for
making a final attempt to collect the delinquent account, skip-tracing and
assigning the account to an approved repossession agent. The department is also
responsible for following up on delivery of the repossessed vehicle,
coordinating all customer redemptions of repossessed vehicles and maintaining
files on repossession agents, including proof of licenses, bonding and
insurance.

Asset Management and Disposition. When a vehicle is repossessed and not
redeemed by the customer in the prescribed time, or the vehicle is returned at
the end of a lease, the vehicle is assigned to the asset management department
for disposal. The vehicles are reviewed by management at the time of
repossession or return and at that time written down to their net realizable
value and a determination made as to the appropriate disposition channel. The
vehicle is typically: (i) disposed of at a wholesale auction; (ii) remarketed on
a wholesale basis through PCSF; (iii) remarketed on a retail basis through PCSF;
or (iv) remarketed on a retail basis through the JDBR Franchise. See "Related
Businesses." During 1996, the Company hired a staff of auction representatives
to monitor the disposal of vehicles at the used car auctions. These
representatives seek to maximize the amount realized on the vehicles through:
(i) inspecting the vehicles for reimbursable insurance damage; (ii) setting
auction price floors; and (iii) enforcing proper auction procedures. The
Company's auction representatives have significantly improved sales prices on
its vehicles.

Asset Recovery. The asset recovery department uses collection
specialists to collect on any loss the Company may incur on an account. Losses
may occur in several ways, including: (i) proceeds received upon liquidation of
the asset are less than the customer's balance on the account and liquidation
costs; (ii) the amount of insurance pay-off or settlement is less than the
customer's balance on the account, and (iii) delinquent accounts are charged off
upon 150-days delinquency. These balances are collected by various means,
including: (i) lump-sum settlement with the customer; (ii) reduced payment
plans; or (iii) referral to a collection agency or an attorney for action,
including wage garnishment, judgment and asset searches. Any amount received
after a contract has been charged off is recorded as a recovery. For the year
ended December 31, 1996, the Company's recoveries resulted in an annualized net
charge-off percentage of 8.07% in comparison to an annualized gross charge-off
percentage of 9.23%.

Management Information Systems

The Company employs information systems, including computer software
programs and a Voice Information Management System, which enable it to manage
more effectively its business activities. The Company's software programs, which
have been specifically modified for the Company, operate on a local area and
wide area network. The Company's COIN system expedites elements of the contract
purchase process, including entry and verification of credit application data,
credit analysis, communication to Dealers of credit decisions, contract
purchases, and contract-related cash disbursements. The Company's LeaseTek
system facilitates elements of asset servicing and management, including
monitoring account activities and maintaining customer contact, expediting
collection and referring delinquent accounts for repossession. The Company's
Voice Information Management System, through continuous routing of incoming
calls, maximizes the efficiency of the Company's asset servicing and collections
departments.

<PAGE>

These systems also provide functions that increase productivity, such as
computer faxing of credit decisions, automatic credit bureau retrieval,
automatic retrieval of NADA and "Black Book" values for financed vehicles,
on-line inquiry for all Contract information to aid in collections,
verification, processing, tracking and solicitation (as applicable) of insurance
and related products. These systems provide for the prompt collection and
retrieval of data concerning the composition of the receivables portfolio, the
characteristics and performance status of the underlying receivables and other
information necessary for management to increase Contract volume, maximize
Contract performance, evaluate and manage personnel and minimize delinquency and
losses.

To increase productivity through automation, the Company is in the
process of converting its asset servicing system to a new product operating on
an AS-400 computer.

Related Businesses

The Company continues to develop its related businesses consisting of
NIS, which offers insurance services and products, and PCSF, which principally
remarkets repossessed and off-lease vehicles. Management believes that these
businesses increase the efficiency of purchasing Loan and Lease Contracts and
provide independent sources of revenue to the Company.

NAL Insurance Services, Inc.

The Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, NIS, is a full service insurance
agency selling a variety of insurance and related products to Dealers as well as
to the Company's customers. The staff of NIS consists of 10 persons. The staff
uses specialized computer software to verify insurance in connection with the
Company's underwriting of Contracts, to track cancellation of existing insurance
policies and to solicit insurance and related products. See "Management
Information Systems." Management believes that these insurance and related
products complement its core business and enhance the Company's relationship
with its Dealers by enabling the Dealers to better service their customers.

Management believes that these products, which are as described below,
enhance its ability to provide a "one-stop shop" service to the Dealer and
thereby increase the efficiency of the Company's purchase of Loan and Lease
Contracts while establishing an additional revenue source. NIS generated
revenues of $2.9 million and $548,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively.

GAP Plan. The Company offers its customers an opportunity to participate
in the Company's guaranteed auto protection ("GAP") plan, a non-insurance
product. In the event of an insurance loss, the GAP plan pays the Company the
difference between the actual cash value protection afforded by the insurer and
the customer balance due the Company. The Company's risk in these transactions
is eliminated through reinsurance. The Company pays a flat premium per contract
to unaffiliated major insurers to reinsure this risk. The Company also pays the
Dealer a commission for each plan sold.

Primary Auto Insurance. As part of the Company's underwriting
procedures, NIS verifies the existence of insurance prior to funding of the
Contracts and also assures that the customer maintains adequate primary auto
insurance during the term of the Contract. The Company solicits sales of primary
auto insurance policies through brochures distributed to Dealers, on-site
training for Dealers and through Dealer personnel. However, the majority of the
Company's sales of primary auto insurance policies

<PAGE>

result from the cancellation of a customer's existing insurance policy, which
the Company tracks through its computer system.

Collateral Protection Insurance. If a customer does not continue to
carry primary auto insurance, the Company is authorized under the Loan or Lease
Contract to provide Collateral Protection Insurance ("CPI") upon notice of
cancellation of the existing insurance of the customer for which the Company
receives a 15% commission on each policy. CPI provides coverage for the actual
cash value of the vehicle in the event of physical damages to the vehicle up to
a total loss, which typically averages 84% of the loan balance. Payments are
automatically included in the monthly car payment on the customer's contract.

Extended Warranty. NIS also offers an extended warranty policy to its
customers directly or through Dealers. The extended warranty covers the customer
for repairs on his used vehicle where the manufacturer's warranty has expired.
Typically, an extended warranty covers the vehicle for an additional 12 months
or 12,000 miles, or for 24 months or 24,000 miles. NIS receives a commission on
all extended warranty policies sold.

Company Insurance Services. NIS provides the Company with internal
insurance services, such as workers compensation, employee dental and health
insurance, contingent and excess liability insurance coverage required in
connection with the Company's leasing operation, key employee life insurance,
and liability and casualty insurance. Management believes that by purchasing
these insurance products through NIS, the Company meets its insurance needs and
recoups commissions that would otherwise be paid in connection with such
products.

Performance Cars of South Florida, Inc.

The Company conducts a vehicle remarketing operation through PCSF, a
wholly-owned subsidiary, and its JDBR Franchise at a retail sales facility
located in Palm Beach County, Florida. The staff of PCSF and the JDBR Franchise
consists of 22 persons, including senior management with an average of over 40
years of experience in the retail automobile business. The Company commenced
this remarketing operation principally as a means of providing a more
cost-effective method of remarketing some of the Company's repossessed and
off-lease vehicles. PCSF operates the JDBR Franchise, pursuant to which the
Company licenses the J.D. Byrider name, trademarks and business system. This
franchise provides national brand name recognition, national advertising,
comprehensive operating systems, ongoing franchise support, as well as employee
and management training in the JDBR system.

Sales at the facility are conducted through either the JDBR Franchise or
directly through PCSF based upon the model, condition, age and mileage of the
vehicle. Some of the vehicles sold by the JDBR Franchise are financed through
its affiliate, Car Now Acceptance Corporation. Typically, less than 10% of the
vehicles sold by PCSF, independent of the JDBR Franchise, are financed through
the Company. Management believes that remarketing vehicles through PCSF offers
several advantages over wholesale auctions (which historically have been the
Company's principal method of disposing of vehicles), including the following:
(i) the vehicles receive an extended period of resale exposure, as the
remarketing operation is open seven days a week, as opposed to the limited
period (typically four days) available at auctions; (ii) the vehicles are
available for visible inspections for staff assessment rather than through
condition reports available from auctions; (iii) the vehicles may be resold at
retail or wholesale instead of at wholesale through auctions; (iv) the staff has
an opportunity to perform appearance and mechanical repairs at reduced prices;
and (v) auction fees of approximately $300 per vehicle are not incurred.
Management believes that PCSF provides a cost-effective alternative to wholesale
disposition

<PAGE>

of vehicles at auction. The Company currently disposes of an average of 32% of
its repossessed and off-lease vehicles through PCSF, including the JDBR
Franchise. In addition to increasing the efficiency of the Company's asset
management and disposition department, PCSF, and in particular the JDBR
Franchise, has been an additional source of revenue to the Company. For the year
ended December 31, 1996, PCSF generated revenues of $1 million.

As the Company's Contract volume increases, it plans to open additional
PCSF sites with JDBR Franchises based on geographic concentration. Currently,
the Company's management anticipates opening a PCSF site with a JDBR Franchise
in Atlanta, Georgia. However, there can be no assurances to that effect.
Management believes that the used car market is an expanding market and offers
the Company an opportunity to further the growth of its JDBR Franchise, increase
the recovery on its vehicles and obtain additional sources of revenue for the
Company.

Competition

Competition in the field of retail automobile finance is intense. The
market is highly fragmented and historically has been serviced by a variety of
financial entities, including the captive finance affiliates of major automobile
manufacturers, banks, savings associations, independent finance companies,
credit unions and leasing companies. Many of these competitors have greater
financial resources than the Company and may have significantly lower cost of
funds. Many of these competitors also have long-standing relationships with
automobile dealerships and may offer dealerships or their customers other forms
of financing or services not provided by the Company. Furthermore, during the
past two years, a number of automobile finance companies have completed public
offerings of common stock, the proceeds from which are to be used, at least in
part, to fund expansion.

The Company's ability to compete successfully depends largely upon its
relationships with its origination sources, particularly Dealers, and the
ability and willingness of such origination sources to offer Contracts that meet
the Company's underwriting criteria for purchase. Management believes that, by
diversifying its origination sources through its Origination Programs, the
Company increases the number of Contracts purchased without significantly
increasing its marketing costs. Management believes that its multi-tiered
underwriting guidelines which balance the creditworthiness of the borrower with
the value of the collateral, enable it to evaluate effectively and measure the
risks associated with lending to consumers with non-prime credit. The Company
also believes that its servicing and collection procedures, specialized
servicing functions and asset disposition enable it to manage its portfolio of
Contracts profitably and in a cost-effective manner. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to continue to compete successfully in
the markets that it serves.

Government Regulation

The Company and the origination sources are subject to regulation and
licensing under various federal, state and local statutes, regulations and
ordinances. Most states in which the Company operates: (i) require the Company
and/or the origination sources to obtain and maintain certain licenses and
qualifications; (ii) limit the interest rate and other charges that may be
imposed by, or prescribe certain other terms of, the Contracts that the Company
purchases; (iii) regulate the sale and type of insurance products offered by the
Company and the insurers for which it acts as agent; (iv) require the Company
and/or the origination sources to provide specified disclosures; and (v) define
the Company's rights to repossess and sell collateral. The Company's agreements
with its origination sources provide that the origination source must indemnify
the Company with respect to any loss or expense the Company incurs

<PAGE>

as a result of violations by the origination source of any federal, state or
local consumer credit and insurance laws, regulations or ordinances.

The Company is subject to numerous federal laws, including the Truth in
Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act
and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and certain rules of the
Federal Trade Commission. These laws require the Company to provide certain
disclosures to applicants, prohibit misleading advertising and protect against
discriminatory financing or unfair credit practices. The Truth in Lending Act
and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder require disclosure of, among other
things, the terms of repayment, the final maturity, the amount financed, the
total finance charge and the annual percentage rate charged on each retail
installment contract. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from
discriminating against loan applicants (including retail installment contract
obligors) on the basis of race, color, sex, age or marital status. Under the
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, creditors are required to make certain disclosures
regarding consumer rights and advise consumers whose credit applications are not
approved of the reasons for the rejection. The Fair Credit Reporting Act
requires the Company to provide certain information to consumers whose credit
applications are not approved on the basis of a report obtained from a consumer
reporting agency. The rules of the Federal Trade Commission limit the types of
property a creditor may accept as collateral to secure a consumer loan and its
holder-in-due-course rules provide for the preservation of the consumer's claims
and defenses when a consumer obligation is assigned to a subject holder. With
respect to used vehicles specifically, the Federal Trade Commission's Rule on
Sale of Used Vehicles requires that all sellers of used vehicles prepare,
complete and display a Buyer's Guide that explains any applicable warranty
coverage for such vehicles. The Credit Practices Rule of the Federal Trade
Commission imposes additional restrictions on loan provisions and credit
practices.

Certain of the states in which the Company operates prohibit Dealers
from charging a finance charge in excess of statutory maximum rates. Finance
charges include interest and any cash sale differential. The Company's
agreements and other communications with Dealers stress the importance of the
Dealers' compliance with all applicable laws and specifically prohibit the
Dealer from agreeing to a cash sale differential. The Company's contractual
agreements with Dealers obligate Dealers to comply with all applicable laws, and
provide that each Dealer must indemnify the Company for any violation of law
relating to a contract originated by the Dealer. Every borrower (as part of the
standard financing documentation) currently is required to sign a written
acknowledgment that (a) the borrower is aware, and approves, of the Dealer's
intended sale of the contract at a discount to the Company, and (b) the borrower
was not quoted a lower price for a cash purchase. Further, it is the Company's
policy to terminate its relationship with any Dealer where the Company becomes
aware of such incidents perpetrated either with the knowledge or tacit assent of
the Dealer, or by more than one salesperson at a particular Dealer. Dealers are
advised of this policy during the initial contacts with the Company's
representatives before the first contract is purchased. As of December 31, 1996,
no Dealer has been so terminated. To the knowledge of the Company, no action has
been brought or is currently threatened or contemplated alleging that Dealers
regularly charge cash sale differentials. Nevertheless, if it were determined
that a material number of the Contracts involved violations of applicable
lending laws by the Dealers, the Company's financial position could be
materially adversely affected and a widespread pattern of violation by Dealers
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's future prospects.

In the event of default by a borrower on a contract, the Company is
entitled to exercise the remedies of a secured party under the Uniform
Commercial Code ("UCC"). The UCC remedies of a secured party include the right
to repossession by self-help means, unless such means would constitute a breach
of peace. Unless the borrower voluntarily surrenders a vehicle, self-help
repossession by an

<PAGE>

independent repossession specialist engaged by the Company is usually employed
by the Company when a borrower defaults. None of the states in which the Company
presently does business has any law that would require the Company, in the
absence of a probable breach of peace, to obtain a court order before it
attempts to repossess a vehicle.

In most jurisdictions the UCC and other state laws require the secured
party to provide the obligor with reasonable notice of the date, time and place
of any public sale or the date after which any private sale of collateral may be
held. Unless the obligor waives his rights after default, the obligor has the
right to redeem the collateral prior to actual sale by paying the secured party
the unpaid installments (less any required discount for prepayment) of the
receivable plus reasonable expenses for repossessing, holding, and preparing the
collateral for disposition and arranging for its sale, plus in some
jurisdictions reasonable attorney's fees, or in some states by payment of
delinquent installments. Repossessed vehicles are generally resold by the
Company through wholesale auctions or remarketed through PCSF or its JDBR
Franchise.

Management believes that it is in compliance with all applicable laws
and regulations. The Company maintains an internal compliance staff to review
and inform management of changes in applicable law and to act as liaison between
the Company and the various attorneys it has retained in each of the states in
which it conducts business.

Employees

The Company employs personnel experienced in all areas of loan
origination, documentation, collection, administration and securitization. As of
December 31, 1996, the Company had 518 full-time employees.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES.

The Company's executive offices and operations occupy approximately
37,183 square feet of leased office space in The Uptown Office Park at 500
Cypress Creek Road West, Suite 590, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for which the
Company pays an aggregate of $72,200 of base rent and common area maintenance
per month pursuant to four leases, with annual increases of approximately 5%.
The leases expire in 2002.

The Company's lease agreements offer rights of first refusal on
available space adjacent to the original offices, which the Company has used to
accommodate the staff required for continued growth. There can be no assurance
that any additional space will be available on terms favorable to the Company.
Management believes that the Company's facilities are appropriate for its needs.

The Company leases approximately 8,825 square feet of office space in
Orlando, Florida, which the Company uses as a regional office. The Company pays
$5,661 per month pursuant to a fifteen-year lease that expires in October 2011.

The Company leases approximately 800 square feet of office space in
Atlanta, Georgia, which the Company uses as a temporary regional office. The
Company pays $4,779 per month for a six month lease that expired in February
1997 which was extended to May 1997.

<PAGE>

The Company through PCSF leases a used car lot in Palm Beach County,
Florida at a base rent of $11,600 per month. The lease expires on December 31,
2000. See "ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - Performance Cars of South Florida,
Inc."

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is currently not a party to any material litigation,
although it is involved from time to time in routine litigation incident to its
business.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Commencing December 1994, the Company's Common Stock was quoted on the
Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol "NALF." In May 1995, the
Company's Common Stock was included in the NASDAQ National Market under the same
symbol.

The following table sets forth the high and low market prices of the
Common Stock for the period from January 1995 through December 1996.

1995 High Low
- ---- ---- ---

First Quarter 12.00 9.50
Second Quarter 13.38 10.25
Third Quarter 18.38 11.25
Fourth Quarter 17.38 9.75

1996 High Low
- ---- ---- ---

First Quarter 14.75 10.63
Second Quarter 16.13 12.38
Third Quarter 14.88 11.75
Fourth Quarter 14.50 8.25

The closing price on March 25, 1997 was $3.375

Records of the Company's stock transfer agent indicate that as of March
25, 1997, the Company had 163 holders of record of its Common Stock. Since a
number of the shares of the Company are held by financial institutions in
"street name," it is likely that the Company has more stockholders than
indicated above. To date, the Company has been unable to accurately ascertain
this information.

Dividend Policy

<PAGE>

No dividends have been declared or paid by NAL since the Merger. The
declaration or payment of dividends is not contemplated in the foreseeable
future. Earnings are expected to be retained to finance and develop the
Company's business. The declaration or payment of future dividends will be
directly dependent upon the earnings of the Company, its financial needs and
other similarly unpredictable factors.

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements (including the notes thereto) and other
financial data included elsewhere in this Report.

The Company is a specialized automobile finance company engaged in the
purchase, securitization and servicing of Contracts originated by franchised and
select independent Dealers in connection with sales or leases of used and new
automobiles to consumers with non-prime credit. Consumers with non-prime credit
are perceived to be relatively high credit risks due to various factors,
including the manner in which they have handled previous credit, the absence or
limited extent of their prior credit history and their limited financial
resources. The Company purchases Contracts relating principally to the "C"
credit segment of the automobile finance market. The Company is also engaged in
offering insurance and related products to its Dealers and customers through its
insurance subsidiary, NIS. The Company has a remarketing subsidiary, PCSF, with
a car dealership franchise, JDBR, which provides a cost-effective means of
disposing of some of the Company's repossessed and off-lease vehicles.

Contract Acquisition

The Company acquires Loan and Lease Contracts from diverse sources. In
order to adjust for credit risk and achieve an acceptable rate of return, the
Company typically purchases Loan Contracts from Dealers at a discount from the
principal amounts of such Contracts. This discount is non-refundable to the
Dealer. Currently, the discount is being allocated to the reserves for credit
losses. See "Acquisition Discounts." During the past two years, the Company
purchased $426.1 million in Loan Contracts and $44.3 million in Lease Contracts.
In order to fund the purchase of Loan Contracts prior to securitization, the
Company utilizes its available cash balances and repurchase facilities. Until
such time as the loans are securitized, automobile loans held for sale by the
Company generate net interest income resulting in the difference between the
interest rate earned on automobile loans held for sale and the interest cost
associated with the Company's repurchase facilities.

The following table provides certain material information
relative to the Contracts acquired by the Company and its servicing portfolio
during each of the last eight quarters.

For the Quarters Ended
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30, Mar. 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996 1995 1995 1995 1995
--------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(Dollars in thousands)

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Data:
Loan Contracts $ 82,839 $ 69,556 $ 50,971 $ 48,326 $ 46,593 $ 31,624 $ 21,364 $ 18,785
Lease Contracts 10,154 6,776 3,609 3,686 3,989 4,085 5,241 6,733
Recourse Programs 4,835 7,091 10,568 5,206 6,696 8,203 6,554 5,838
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Contracts $ 97,828 $ 83,423 $ 65,148 $ 57,218 $ 57,278 $ 43,912 $ 33,159 $ 31,356
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Number of Dealers (at end of period) 2,122 1,594 1,381 1,271 909 787 406 296
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Servicing portfolio (at end of period):
Owned $ 91,934 $108,208 $111,928 $117,210 $113,830 $111,888 $ 87,938 $ 65,824
Serviced for securitization trusts 243,932 175,679 118,818 73,741 39,934 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total servicing portfolio $335,866 $283,887 $230,746 $190,951 $153,764 $111,888 $ 87,938 $ 65,824
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- -----------

<PAGE>

The Company's level of Contract acquisitions are impacted by a
combination of the Company's underwriting criteria, which is subject to change
from time to time, and the Company's ability to successfully market its Dealer
Program to new Dealers. The Company has experienced significant growth in the
volume of Contracts acquired during 1996. Contract volume has increased to
$303.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1996 from $165.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 1995, representing a growth rate of 83%. The growth in
Contract volume is attributable primarily to the increase in the number of
Dealers the Company has under contract, as well as an expansion of the sources
and amounts of financing available to purchase Contracts. The number of Dealers
the Company currently has under contract increased to 2,122 at December 31, 1996
from 909 at December 31, 1995, representing a growth rate of 133%. The increase
in volume during 1996 was partially offset by a strengthening of the Company's
underwriting criteria beginning with the second quarter of 1996. The change in
underwriting criteria was in response to analyses of the performance of the
Contracts originated in the nine months prior to this change which indicated
higher credit losses than originally anticipated. The Company continues to
monitor the performance of its Contracts and may make further adjustments to its
underwriting criteria in the future if the analyses warrant a modification.
Future levels of Contract acquisition may be affected by any such modifications.
The growth in Contract volume has resulted in an increase in the Company's
servicing portfolio, which at December 31, 1996 was $335.9 million compared to
$153.8 million at December 31, 1995, representing a growth rate of 118%.

Revenues

The increase in Contract volume and the servicing portfolio has led to
an increase in revenues as demonstrated in the following table:

For the Years Ended
----------------------------------------------
Dec. 31, 1996 Dec. 31, 1995
--------------------- ---------------------
(Dollars in thousands)

Revenue Data:
Interest income:
Loan Contracts $ 15,180 $ 9,376
Lease Contracts 4,958 2,524
Recourse Programs 2,588 2,417
-------- --------
Total interest income 22,726 14,317
Non-automobile interest
income 416 1,363
Gain on sale of Loan Contracts 19,872 4,601
Servicing fees, net 1,699 100
Insurance fees 2,916 548
Other fees 3,497 2,003
-------- --------
Total revenues $ 51,126 $ 22,932
======== ========

The Company generates revenues primarily through the purchase,
securitization and ongoing servicing of Contracts. The Company earns interest
income and fees on Contracts purchased and held in portfolio, including those
awaiting securitization. Interest income on the non-automobile portfolio
consists of interest earned on mortgage loans, marine loans, and other consumer
loans acquired by the Company through bulk purchases prior to June 30, 1994.
Upon the sale of Loan Contracts through the Company's securitization program,
the Company recognizes a gain on sale on the Loan Contracts. See "Gain on Sale
of Loan Contracts." The Company continues to service these Loan Contracts and
earns a servicing fee currently equal to three percent per year of the
outstanding principal balance of the Loan Contracts sold. The Company also
receives revenues from the sale of insurance and related products, and other
miscellaneous fees.

<PAGE>

Net Interest Income

Net interest income ("Net Interest Income") is the difference between
the interest earned on Contracts held in portfolio, including those awaiting
securitization, and the interest costs associated with the Company's borrowings
to finance such Contracts. Net Interest Income will fluctuate and be impacted by
the spread between the portfolio yield and the cost of the Company's borrowings,
changes in overall Contract acquisition volume and the timing of securitization
transactions. The following table illustrates the weighted average net interest
rate spread (expressed as a percentage) earned on Contracts acquired:

For the Years Ended
--------------------------------------
Dec. 31, 1996 Dec. 31, 1995
------------- -------------

Net Interest Spread:
Interest income:(1)
Loan Contracts 20.35% 20.65%
Lease Contracts 17.72% 15.89%
Recourse Program 18.57% 18.89%
----- -----
Total automobile
Contracts 19.51% 19.32%
Non-automobile Contracts 13.72% 23.06%
----- -----

Total 19.36% 19.60%
Interest expense(2) 10.17% 11.18%
----- -----
Net interest spread 9.19% 8.42%
===== =====

- ---------------------

(1) Represents interest income plus discount accretion (if any) and fees, less
amortization of capitalized costs, expressed as a percentage of average
receivables outstanding.

(2) Represents interest expense as a percentage of average total debt
outstanding.

The increase in net interest spread is primarily due to the benefits of
a lower-cost financing source obtained in the latter part of 1995. This includes
a warehouse facility (see "Warehouse Facility") used to warehouse Loan Contracts
prior to securitization. In addition, securitization transactions have also
contributed to a lower cost of funds as the rates paid to investors of these
transactions were lower than the rates charged on financing sources used during
1995.

<PAGE>

Gain on Sale of Loan Contracts

The Company has sold Loan Contracts through its securitization program
in each of the last six quarters. The Company recognizes a gain on sale of Loan
Contracts in an amount equal to: (i) the excess servicing receivable ("Excess
Servicing Receivable") expected from the trust during the life of the
securitization, plus (ii) the net proceeds received from the securitization less
the aggregate book value of the Loan Contracts transferred to the trust. The
Excess Servicing Receivable represents the estimated present value of excess
servicing cash flows ("Excess Servicing Cash Flows") based on the Company's
estimates for loss and prepayments during the life of the securitization
transaction. Quarterly, the Company reviews the assumptions made in determining
the Excess Servicing Receivable. If the present value of future aggregate Excess
Servicing Cash Flows is less than the aggregate capitalized amount, a valuation
adjustment would be recorded. Excess Servicing Cash Flows represent the
difference between the cash flows on Loan Contracts in a securitization trust
and the sum of (i) payments of principal and interest required to be made to
investors in the securitized pool, (ii) the contractual servicing fee, currently
at the rate of three percent per year, and (iii) other on-going expenses of such
trust. The Company is currently not receiving its distribution of servicing cash
flows associated with its securitization trusts. See "Liquidity and Capital
Resources - Securitization."

The gain on sale of Loan Contracts is affected by, among other things,
the amount of Loan Contracts sold in the securitization transaction, the net
spread on the transaction, the up-front costs of the transaction and estimated
losses and prepayments on the Loan Contracts. Net spread is the major component
of the total gain on sale. The following table illustrates the net spread for
each of the Company's securitization transactions:

Weighted Interest
Average Rate Paid
Securitized Contract to Gross Net
Securitization: Balance Rate Investors(1) Spread(2) Spread(3)
------- ---- --------- ------ ------
(Dollars In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996-4 Securitization Trust ....... $ 88,044 19.50% 7.02% 12.48% 9.48%
1996-3 Securitization Trust ....... 70,052 19.37% 7.42% 11.95% 8.95%
1996-2 Securitization Trust ....... 49,500 19.20% 7.58% 11.62% 8.62%
1996-1 Securitization Trust ....... 40,750 19.26% 7.47% 11.79% 8.79%
1995-1 Securitization Trust ....... 40,136 19.58% 7.10% 12.48% 9.48%
--------
Total ........................... $288,482
========
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Weighted average interest rate paid to investors in the securitization
transaction.
(2) Difference between weighted average Contract rate and weighted average
interest rate paid to investors.
(3) Difference between gross spread less contractual servicing fees at 3%.

The decrease in the net spread from the 1995-1 Securitization Trust to
the 1996-1 Securitization Trust, and the further decline in the net spread on
the 1996-2 Securitization Trust, was primarily due to an increase in the
interest rate paid to investors, due primarily to an increase in market interest
rates.

The increase in the net spread for the 1996-3 and 1996-4 securitization
transactions, compared to the prior two securitization transactions, was
attributable to a higher-weighted average coupon rate due primarily to the
Company's expansion outside the state of Florida. A corresponding decrease in

<PAGE>

the interest rate paid to investors, due primarily to a decrease in market
rates, also contributed to a higher net spread.

As of March 26, 1997, the Company closed on the sale of approximately
$82.3 million of automobile Loan Contracts through a 1997-1 Securitization
Trust. The securities issued in the transaction were rated "A" and "BBB" by
Fitch Investors Service, L.P. This transaction resulted in a weighted average
rate paid to investors of 8.32%, which was higher than the rate for the 1996-4
Securitization Trust, closed in December 1996, due primarily to higher market
interest rates and, to some extent, the effect of recent financial concerns
within the automobile finance industry.

Net Servicing Fee Income

Throughout the life of the Loan Contract, the Company earns a
contractual servicing fee from the securitization trust, currently equal to
three percent per year of the principal balance outstanding of the Loan
Contracts sold to the trust. Servicing fees are reported as income when earned,
net of the related amortization of servicing receivables. Net servicing fees may
be reduced from those that are contractually due if the Company believes that
estimated future cash flows would be insufficient to recover the carrying value
of the servicing receivables. Servicing costs are charged to expense as
incurred. Net servicing fee income increased from $100,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1995, representing one month's servicing income from the 1995-1
Securitization Trust, to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1996.

Net servicing fee income and the Excess Servicing Receivable may be
impacted by changes in the amount of losses and levels of prepayments from those
assumed by the Company at the time of the securitization. To the extent the
assumptions used are materially different from actual results, the amount of
Excess Servicing Cash Flows received by the Company over the remaining life of
the securitization could be significantly affected.

Other Income

The Company generates revenues from the sale of a variety of insurance
and related products to Dealers and its customers, acting as agent for
third-party insurance companies. The Company recognizes as revenue the
commissions or fees received upon the sale of these products to customers. Other
fees consist primarily of late fees earned on the Company's servicing portfolio.
Insurance and other fees have continued to increase due primarily to the
increase in the volume of Contracts purchased and the growth in the servicing
portfolio.

Results of Operations

The following table provides the principal components of the Company's
net income for the periods presented:

For the Years Ended
-------------------
Results of Operations: Dec 31, 1996 Dec 31, 1995
------------ ------------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Net interest income(1) $12,188 $8,319
Gain on sale of Loan Contracts 19,872 4,600
Net servicing fees and other income 8,113 2,651
------- ------
Total revenue 40,173 15,570
Provision for credit losses (5,477) (2,762)
Operating expenses (22,496) (7,805)
Non-cash charge for escrow shares (301) (280)
------- ------
Income before taxes 11,899 4,723
Provision for income taxes (4,631) (1,926)
------- ------
Net income $ 7,268 $2,797
======= ======
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Net of interest expense of $10,954 and $7,362 for the years
ended 1996 and 1995, respectively.

<PAGE>

Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the year ended December 31,
1996 was $12.2 million compared to $8.3 million for the year ended December 31,
1995, representing a 47% increase. This increase was primarily a result of the
growth in average Contracts held in portfolio and those awaiting securitization
from $84.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1995 to $119.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 1996.

Gain on Sale of Loan Contracts. Total gain on sale of Loan Contracts for
the year ended December 31, 1996 was $19.9 million compared to $4.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 1995. This increase was due to four additional
securitizations completed during 1996. The Company completed a $40 million
securitization during the fourth quarter of 1995 resulting in a $4.0 million
gain. In addition, the Company recognized a $600,000 gain from selling loan
portfolios through bulk sale arrangements during 1995.

Net Servicing Fees and Other Income. During the year ended December 31,
1996, the Company completed four securitization transactions aggregating $248.3
million. As a result, net servicing fee income was $1.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 1996 compared to $100,000 for the preceding year. Other
income, consisting primarily of insurance and late fees, increased from $2.6 for
the year ended December 31, 1995 to $6.4 million for the year ended December 31,
1996. These increases were primarily due to an increase in the volume of
Contracts purchased and the growth in the servicing portfolio to $335.9 million
at December 31, 1996 from $153.8 million at December 31, 1995. In addition, the
Company recorded $517,000 to other income relating to the settlement of
outstanding litigation during June 1996.

Provision for Credit Losses. The Company's provision for credit losses
for the year ended December 31, 1996 was $5.5 million compared to $2.8 for the
year ended December 31, 1995, a 98% increase. This increase related primarily to
provisions recorded for an estimate of possible losses that may be incurred in
connection with the acquisition of Contracts during 1996 and with the
performance of previously-purchased Contracts.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses increased to $22.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to $7.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 1995, a 188% increase. This increase was attributable to the hiring
of additional personnel in almost every area of the Company's operations to
support its growth. In addition, the acquisition of SFI in June 1996 contributed
significantly to the increase in operating expenses for the year ended December
31, 1996. As a result of the acquisition, the Company has absorbed all of the
overhead of SFI since July 1, 1996, amounting to $6.4 million. The Company is
currently reviewing the operations of SFI to determine if there are redundancies
which can be reduced during 1997. As a percentage of average total servicing
portfolio, operating expenses increased to 9.41% in 1996 from 8.41% in 1995.

<PAGE>

Non-Cash Charge For Escrow Shares. The Company recorded a charge to
earnings of $301,000 for the year ended December 31, 1996 for shares released
from the escrow arrangement that was established in connection with the Merger
compared to $280,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995.

Net Income. The Company reported net income of $7.3 million or $0.86 per
fully diluted share for the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to net income
of $2.8 million or $ 0.45 per fully diluted share, for the year ended December
31, 1995. Net income, excluding the non-cash charge for releasing escrow shares,
was $7.6 million, or $0.88 per fully diluted share, for the year ended December
31, 1996, in comparison to $3.0 million, or $0.50 per fully diluted share, for
the year ended December 31, 1995.

Delinquency and Credit Loss Experience

The Company's profitability depends largely upon its ability to
effectively manage delinquency and credit losses. The Company maintains a
reserve available to absorb future credit losses on Contracts that are held in
portfolio and on Loan Contracts while they are awaiting securitization. The
Company evaluates historical charge-off experience against the reserve and
performs analyses of portfolio performance and delinquency trends to determine
if the reserve is adequate to absorb estimated future losses.

Collection and Charge-off Procedures. Typically within 24 hours of an
account becoming delinquent, a collector establishes contact with the customer.
If the delinquency is not promptly resolved, the collector pursues a resolution
through additional telephone contacts with the customer followed by demand
letters as appropriate. In the event that a delinquency cannot be resolved, the
account is turned over for repossession of the vehicle by an outside agency,
typically within 45 days. When a vehicle is repossessed and not redeemed by the
customer within a period prescribed by statute, the vehicle is assigned for
disposal. At the time of repossession, the vehicle is reviewed by management and
its carrying value is written down, if necessary, to its net realizable value.
Write-downs of carrying value, which include costs of disposition, are charged
against the Company's reserves available for credit losses. Vehicles typically
are disposed of at wholesale auctions, or remarketed through PCSF or through the
JDBR Franchise. The Company may establish a dialogue with a delinquent borrower
and formulate a short-term payment arrangement that would allow the borrower to
retain the automobile beyond a delinquency of 45 days. Accounts that reach 90
days of delinquency are placed on non-accrual status and any previously-accrued
interest income is reversed. In the event that the Company is unable to locate
the customer or the vehicle by the time an account reaches 150 days of
delinquent status, the account is fully charged off against reserves available
for credit losses. If the customer declares bankruptcy, the account is charged
off to the lesser of any court-ordered settlement or the wholesale value of the
vehicle. The Company's collection staff continues to pursue customers, to locate
and repossess vehicles and to collect losses incurred. Any amount received after
a Contract has been charged off is recorded as a recovery and an increase in the
reserves available for credit losses.

Acquisition Discounts. The Company purchases Contracts from Dealers at
discounts from their stated principal amount to provide for credit risk. The
discounts typically range from 3% to 10%. The amount of the discount varies
primarily based on the credit risk and the terms of the Contract and the quality
of the collateral. See "ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - Underwriting." Any
discount that management considers necessary to absorb future credit losses is
allocated to the reserves available for credit losses. The remaining portion of
the discount, if any, is recognized as income using the level-yield method of
accretion. Currently, the Company allocates the entire discount to the reserves
available for credit losses and expects to do so for the foreseeable future.
However, the Company will continue to evaluate the ability to collect on its
Contracts in conjunction with the allocation of discounts.

Reserves Available for Credit Losses. In the event of a payment default,
proceeds from the liquidation of the vehicle may not cover the outstanding
Contract balance and costs of recovery. The Company maintains a reserve
available for credit losses in an amount that management believes is adequate to
absorb future credit losses on Contracts. The reserves available for credit
losses is

29
<PAGE>

comprised of the acquisition discounts, an allowance for credit losses and, in
limited cases, dealer reserves. On a monthly basis, the Company evaluates the
adequacy of the reserves available for credit losses by analyzing the Contract
portfolios in their entirety using a 'static pool analysis' method in which the
historical charge-offs are stratified according to the Contract origination
date. These Contracts are grouped together by calendar month of origination, and
the related historical charge-off experience on such Contracts is analyzed to
evaluate the reasonableness and adequacy of the reserves available for credit
losses. This analysis takes into consideration historical loss experience,
current economic conditions, levels of repossessed assets, delinquency
experience, seasoning of Contracts, and other relevant factors. Should
management deem the level of acquisition discounts and dealer reserves, in
limited cases, to be inadequate, an additional provision for credit losses will
be recorded to increase the allowance for credit losses and, therefore, increase
the overall level of the reserves available for credit losses.

The Company has prepared analyses of its Contracts, based on its credit
experience and available industry data, to identify the delinquency and default
rates at the various stages of a Contract's repayment term. The results of the
analyses suggest that the probability of a Contract becoming delinquent or going
into default is highest during the "seasoning period," which begins 3 to 4
months, and ends 12 to 14 months, after the origination date. If the volume of
Contracts purchased by the Company continues to grow, an increasingly greater
portion of the Company's portfolio is expected to fall into the "seasoning
period" described above, causing a rise in the overall portfolio delinquency and
default rates. Assuming no changes in any other factors that may affect
delinquency and default rates, the Company's management believes that this trend
should stabilize or reverse when the volume of mature Contracts (with lower
delinquency and default rates) is sufficient to offset the delinquency and
default rates on newer Contracts.

<PAGE>

The following table sets forth information regarding credit loss
experience of the total servicing portfolio for the periods presented:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended
-------------------
Credit Losses:(1) Dec. 31, 1996 Dec. 31, 1995
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Loan Contracts serviced:
Gross charge-off percentage(2) 10.35% 3.68%
Net charge-off percentage(3) 9.12% 3.68%

Lease Contracts serviced:
Gross charge-off percentage(2) 7.82% 4.19%
Net charge-off percentage(3) 6.35% 4.19%

Total Loan and Lease Contracts serviced:
Gross charge-off percentage(2) 10.03% 3.78%
Net charge-off percentage(3) 8.78% 3.78%

Recourse Contracts serviced:
Gross charge-off percentage(2) N/A N/A
Net charge-off percentage(3) N/A N/A

Total servicing portfolio:
Gross charge-off percentage(2) 9.23% 3.15%
Net charge-off percentage(3) 8.07% 3.15%
</TABLE>

- ----------
(1) This table excludes non-automobile bulk purchase contracts.
(2) Gross charge-offs are computed as principal balance less liquidation
proceeds received expressed as a percentage of average balance outstanding
during the period.
(3) Net charge-offs are computed as gross charge-offs less any
recoveries expressed as a percentage of average balance outstanding during
the period.

The increase in the level of credit losses was due primarily to two
factors: (i) the relative degree of seasoning of the Company's servicing
portfolio during the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to that for the year
ended December 31, 1995, and (ii) the level of credit losses experienced during
the year ended December 31, 1996 on Contracts purchased from July 1995 to March
1996 due to the relaxation of certain underwriting criteria during that period.

The Company started purchasing Contracts during the second half of 1994.
Consequently, the servicing portfolio through December 31, 1995 reflects a lower
degree of seasoning when compared to the servicing portfolio through December
31, 1996. At December 31, 1995, the weighted average seasoning of the Company's
Contracts was 5.04 months compared to an weighted average seasoning of 9.49
months for Contracts at December 31, 1996.

During the period July 1995 to March 1996, the Company relaxed certain
underwriting criteria. As a result, the Company has experienced higher than
expected credit losses on these Contracts. For the year ended December 31, 1996,
60% of the Company's net charge-offs were incurred on Contracts purchased during
this period on an average balance for the year which represented 44% of the
average servicing portfolio. In response to the higher level of credit losses,
management decided to strengthen its underwriting criteria beginning in March
1996.

Delinquency Experience. The following table reflects the Company's
delinquency experience for the periods presented:

As of December 31,
----------------------------
1996 1995
--------- ---------
Delinquency:(1) (Dollars in thousands)

<S> <C> <C>
Loan Contracts serviced: $ 273,549 $ 107,191
Delinquencies:
31-60 days 10.30% 8.83%
61-90 days 3.38% 2.99%
Greater than 90 days 1.52% 2.18%
--------- ---------
Total 15.20% 14.00%

Lease Contracts serviced: $ 36,308 $ 21,361
Delinquencies:
31-60 days 6.47% 7.51%
61-90 days 2.00% 1.90%
Greater than 90 days 2.54% 1.83%
--------- ---------
Total 11.01% 11.24%

Total Loan and Lease
Contracts serviced: $ 309,857 $ 128,552
Delinquencies:
31-60 days 9.85% 8.61%
61-90 days 3.13% 2.81%
Greater than 90 days 1.64% 2.12%
--------- ---------
Total 14.62% 13.54%

Recourse Contracts serviced: $ 14,107 $ 18,129
Delinquencies:
31-60 days 9.69% 16.99%
61-90 days(2) N/A N/A
Greater than 90 days(2) N/A N/A
--------- ---------
Total 9.69% 16.99%

Total Contracts serviced: $ 323,964 $ 146,681
Delinquencies:
31-60 days 9.85% 9.65%
61-90 days 2.99% 2.46%
Greater than 90 days 1.57% 1.86%
--------- ---------
Total 14.41% 13.97%
========= =========

</TABLE>

- ----------
(1) This table excludes non-automobile bulk purchase contracts. In addition,
this table excludes two automobile bulk purchase portfolios which were
non-performing at the time of purchase in 1994 and are accounted for on a
cost recovery basis, whereby income is recognized only to the extent that
the Company's investment in these portfolios has been fully recouped. As of
December 31, 1996, the combined investment in these portfolios totaled
$947,000.
(2) Contracts delinquent 61 days or more are repurchased by the originator of
the Contracts under the Recourse Program.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company's business requires substantial cash to support its growth
in the rate of acquisition of new Contracts and to fund its expenses. The
Company has historically operated on

<PAGE>

a negative operating cash flow basis and expects to continue to do so as long
as the volume of Contracts continues to grow. As a result of the historical
growth rate, the Company has used increasingly larger amounts of cash than it
has generated from its operating activities. The Company has funded these
negative operating cash flows by drawing against its available warehouse and
credit facilities. These facilities provide between 80% and 90% of the principal
balance of the Contracts. The Company funds the remainder of the purchase price
through its capital.

In connection with the securitization of Loan Contracts, the Company is
required to fund reserve accounts related to each transaction. The Company funds
these reserve accounts through a combination of an initial cash deposit and the
capture of contractual and excess servicing cash flows until such reserve
accounts reach predetermined levels. These levels may be increased depending on
the delinquency and loss experience of the trusts. Currently, all of the reserve
accounts related to the Company's securitizations are building to their required
levels, and, accordingly, the Company is not receiving its distributions of cash
flows.

The Company has experienced recent liquidity concerns due to a
combination of certain factors relating to the operation of its securitization
trusts and the acquisition of certain Contracts which are pending financing.
Recently, the Company has, in the normal course of its business, acquired Lease
Contracts and contracts under its Recourse Program which currently are not
financed through the Company's existing warehouse and credit facilities. The
Company intends to finance these assets and/or sell the assets to third parties.

The Company is actively pursuing sources to fully and efficiently
finance its Contracts and related assets. In addition, the Company continues to
explore alternative structures for securitization of its Loan Contracts in order
to achieve a lower cost of financing and to maximize the proceeds from the
securitization transactions. As the Company continues to increase the volume of
Contracts purchased, it must secure capital to support its growth. The Company's
growth has been facilitated by its ability to complete public and private
placements of debt and equity securities, although there can be no assurances
that the Company will be able to continue to generate capital through such
placements of debt and equity securities.

Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources:

Through December 31, 1996, the Company had secured its principal sources
of financing through senior indebtedness comprised of its warehouse facility,
revolving credit facilities and its specialized borrowing facility, as well as
subordinated indebtedness consisting of unsecured subordinated debentures. In
addition, the Company secures liquidity through the securitization of its Loan
Contracts. From December 1995 through March 1997, the Company has completed an
aggregate of approximately $370.8 million of securitization transactions.

As of December 31,
-----------------------
1996 1995
-------- -------
Sources of Financing: (Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Warehouse Facility:
Available line $100,000 $50,000
Outstanding balance 22,907 11,585

Revolving Credit Facilities:
Available line 45,000 45,000
Outstanding balance 24,384 21,844

Revolving Line of Credit Facility:
Available line 9,500 --
Outstanding balance 4,732 --

Specialized Borrowing Facility: 3,145 42,381

Subordinated Debentures:
Issued-cumulative 38,825 21,325
Converted to Common Stock-cumulative (13,825) (8,260)
-------- --------
Outstanding balance 25,000 13,065

Note due to Stockholder -- 2,919
-------- --------
Total outstanding borrowings $ 80,168 $ 91,974
======== ========
</TABLE>
- ----------

Warehouse Facility. During September 1995, the Company entered into a
$50 million warehouse facility (the "Warehouse Facility") with Greenwich Capital
Financial Products, Inc. ("Greenwich"). In November 1996, the Warehouse Facility
was increased to $100 million. This facility is structured as a reverse
repurchase agreement, which is characterized as a borrowing for financial-
reporting purposes. Under the terms of this facility, the Company receives an
advance of approximately 90% of the outstanding principal balance of the Loan
Contract at an interest rate of 2.25% over 30-day LIBOR. If at any time during
the financing period 90% of the market value of the Contract is less than the
amount advanced, Greenwich may require the Company to transfer funds or
additional Contracts to Greenwich until the deficiency ("margin") amount is
satisfied. Market value of Loan Contracts may be affected by such factors as
changes in interest rates, delinquency rates and credit losses. Although
management believes that this is unlikely to occur to any significant degree, a
margin call could require an allocation of certain of the Company's liquidity
and capital resources. The Warehouse Facility expires in September 1997 and is
renewable for an additional year subject to certain conditions. At December 31,
1996, the Company had $ 22.9 million outstanding under this facility.

The Warehouse Facility includes certain financial and operational
covenants, including the maintenance of a minimum net worth of $30 million, the
prohibition of a debt-to-equity ratio in excess of 8 to 1, and maintenance of
certain loan portfolio performance criteria. For the purpose of the Warehouse
Facility, net worth has been defined as total stockholders' equity plus
subordinated indebtedness not due within 90 days. At December 31, 1996, the
Company was in compliance with all relevant financial and operational covenants.
Management continues to monitor closely the performance of its Loan portfolios
in order to ensure compliance with all financial and operational covenants.

34
<PAGE>

An event of default is also deemed to occur under the Warehouse Facility
in the event of the death of two of the Company's executive officers (or if both
of these individuals cease serving as officers).

The Company uses the Warehouse Facility to purchase Loan Contracts with
the objective of selling such Contracts through securitization transactions.
Since the fourth quarter of 1995 and through March 1997, the Company has
completed in the aggregate the sale of approximately $370.8 million of Loan
Contracts through privately-placed securitization transactions. The proceeds
from the securitization transactions have been used to pay down the Warehouse
Facility, thereby making the Warehouse Facility available to fund purchases of
additional Contracts.

Revolving Credit Facilities. In March 1993, the Company entered into a
$20 million three-year revolving credit facility (the "Congress Facility") with
Congress Financial Corporation ("Congress"), which has been extended until March
1998. The Congress Facility bears interest at a floating rate of 2% over the
prime rate of CoreStates Bank, N.A., with interest payable monthly, and the
facility is secured by Loan and Lease Contracts. The facility can be utilized
for the financing of additional Contract purchases that meet certain credit
guidelines established by Congress, in its sole discretion. As of December 31,
1996, the Company had no borrowings under this facility.

During February 1994, the Company entered into a $5 million one-year
revolving credit facility with GECC (the "GECC Facility"). In September 1994 and
March 1995, the GECC Facility was increased to $10 million and $25 million,
respectively. The GECC Facility bears interest payable monthly at rates fixed at
the time of financing and is secured by certain Lease Contracts. Principal is
repaid monthly according to an agreed-upon schedule. At December 31, 1996, the
Company had drawn down approximately $24.4 million under the facility. The
Company has applied for an increase in this facility to accommodate the growth
in the Lease Contract portfolio. The GECC Facility is automatically renewed
annually unless GECC provides the Company with notice of termination 90 days
prior to such renewal date.

The Congress Facility and the GECC Facility (collectively, the
"Revolving Credit Facilities") are also subject to certain financial and
operational covenants that are similar to those imposed under the Warehouse
Facility.

Revolving Line of Credit Facility. During September 1996, the Company
entered into a one-year $3.5 million revolving line of credit (the "LOC
Facility") with a private third party. The LOC Facility was subsequently
increased to $9.5 million and is renewable at the lender's discretion for an
additional one-year period, provided that the Company meets certain conditions.
The LOC Facility bears interest at a fixed rate of 13% to 14% with interest
payable monthly. The LOC Facility is secured by certain Loan Contracts. As of
December 31, 1996, the Company had drawn down approximately $4.7 million under
this facility.

Specialized Borrowing Facility. The Company historically has secured a
significant amount of its financing through borrowings classified as debt
participation agreements in which the Company has sold an undivided interest,
typically 80% to 90%, in portfolios of receivables to financial institutions and
individual lenders on a full-recourse basis. As of December 31, 1996, the
Company had an existing series of borrowings under a specialized borrowing
facility (the "Specialized Borrowing Facility") with Fairfax Savings, a Federal
Savings Bank ("Fairfax") in the approximate amount of $3.1 million.
Approximately $2.6 million of the Fairfax financing has been used to acquire
Contracts. Borrowings under this facility are subject to interest at prime plus
2.5% fixed at the time of financing.

35
<PAGE>

Approximately $500,000 of the remaining advances under the Specialized Borrowing
Facility were used to acquire bulk purchase portfolios prior to 1995. These
amounts are subject to interest at fixed rates from 10% to 13.5%, respectively.

In general, under the terms of the participation agreements, the
lender's principal advance is repaid in proportion to the principal received
from the underlying collateral. Interest on the outstanding principal balance of
the advance is due monthly. Collections received in excess of the principal and
interest due Fairfax are allocated to a restricted cash reserve account on
deposit with Fairfax until certain specified balances are maintained, generally
calculated as a percentage of the outstanding balance of the advance. Any
remaining collections are paid to the Company.

Short-term Financing. During the fourth quarter of 1996, Mr. Robert R.
Bartolini, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, made advances to the Company in
an aggregate amount of $2,413,869, at a fixed interest rate of 11%. During
December 1996, the Company entered into a $2 million secured short-term note
with a private third party. Both short-term financings were repaid by December
31, 1996 from the net proceeds of an underwritten secondary offering of Common
Stock which was concluded in December 1996.

Private Placement of Convertible Subordinated Debentures, Warrants and
Common Stock. The Company has secured a significant component of its capital
through the private placement of equity and debt securities. During the period
from April 1995 through September 1996, the Company issued: (i) 176,500 shares
of its Common Stock, which yielded net proceeds of approximately $2.1 million;
(ii) $38.8 million principal amount of convertible subordinated debentures (the
"Debentures"); and (iii) 2,913,625 common stock purchase warrants (the
"Warrants"). The Warrants were issued to Debenture holders in connection with
the sale of the Debentures, to certain consultants and advisors in consideration
for financial advisory services, and to certain members of the Board of
Directors in connection with joining the Board.

Of the outstanding Debentures, the Company concluded institutional
placements of $10 million principal amount of 9% Debentures with 675,000
Warrants in April 1996, and $5 million principal amount of 10% Debentures with
62,500 Warrants in September 1996.

Through March 25, 1997, an aggregate of approximately $14.8 million
principal amount of the Debentures was converted into 1,644,669 shares of Common
Stock. The principal amount and accrued interest due under the remainder of the
Debentures is convertible into shares of Common Stock (at the option of the
holders thereof) at conversion prices ranging from $7.50 to $11.00. The
conversion price of certain Debentures is subject to decrease by virtue of price
protection and adjustment features contained in such Debentures.

The following table provides a summary of the Company's
outstanding Debentures.(1)

36
<PAGE>

Principal Maturity Interest Conversion Shares
Amount Issue Date Date Rate Price(2) Issuable(3)
------ ---------- ---- ---- -------- -----------

$ 1,800,000 Nov. 1995 May 1997 9% $11.00 185,727
1,700,000 Dec. 1995 Jun. 1997 9% 11.00 175,371
10,000,000 Apr. 1995 Oct. 1997 9% 7.50 1,513,333
2,000,000 Jul. 1995 Apr. 1998 9% 9.00 276,389
1,000,000 Aug. 1995 Apr. 1998 9% 9.00 137,333
5,000,000 Sep. 1996 Sep. 1998(4) 10%(4) 7.50 666,667
2,500,000 Jan. 1996 Jan. 1999 9% 11.00 288,637
- ----------- ---------
$24,000,000 3,243,457
=========== =========

- ----------
(1) Reflects information as of March 25, 1997.
(2) These Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company's Common Stock
at the lesser of the amount indicated and a discount to the market price of
the Company's Common Stock, which ranges from 75% to 85% pursuant to the
terms of the Debentures. If such Debentures were converted based upon a
market price of $3.375, the Company would be caused to issue up to an
additional 5,811,570 shares of Common Stock.
(3) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Debentures
(principal and interest at maturity) at their stated conversion price.
(4) These Debentures bear interest at a rate of 10% for 2 years and at a rate of
9% thereafter. Maturity is subject to extension by the holder.

As of March 25, 1997 the Company had $24 million principal amount of
Debentures outstanding with maturity dates as follows: (i) $1.8 million in May
1997; (ii) $1.7 million in June 1997; (iii) $10 million in October 1997; (iv) $3
million in April 1998; (v) 5.0 million in September 1998 (subject to extension
by holder); and (vi) $2.5 million in January 1999.

The Company's liquidity and capital resources are affected by the
trading price of the Company's Common Stock. In view of the recent adverse
publicity affecting the non-prime loan market and the decline in the trading
price of the Company's Common Stock, management is uncertain as to the
likelihood that the holders of the Debentures will convert at their scheduled
maturity date. If such Debenture holders decide not to convert, the Company
would be required to allocate $13.5 million in liquidity and capital resources
towards repayment of principal on such Debentures during 1997.

The Company has issued 2,913,625 Warrants at exercise prices between
$7.50 and $15.00. To date, none of the Warrants have been exercised. If
exercised, the Company would receive aggregate gross proceeds of approximately
$29.7 million. The exercise price of certain Warrants and the proceeds thereof
are subject to decrease by virtue of price protection and adjustment features
contained in such Warrants.

The following table provides a summary of outstanding Warrants.(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Proceeds to
Issue Date Expiration Date Exercise Price Issuable(2) the Company(3)
- ---------- --------------- -------------- ----------- --------------

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Apr.-Aug. 1995 Apr. 1998 $ 9.00 1,360,000 $12,240,000
Nov. 1995-Dec. 1995 Nov. 1998-Dec. 1998 13.50 87,500 1,181,250
Nov. 1995-Feb. 1996 Nov. 1998- Feb. 1999 14.00 to 14.38 282,500 3,962,500
Jul.-Aug. 1995 Jul.-Aug. 1998 12.00 to 12.30 62,500 765,000
Jul.-Dec. 1995 Jul.-Dec. 1998 15.00 363,625 5,454,375
Mar. 1996 Mar. 1999 11.50 20,000 230,000
Apr. 1996 Apr. 1999 7.50 615,000 4,612,500
Apr. 1996 Apr. 2001 7.50 60,000 450,000
Sep. 1996 Sep. 2001 7.50 113,500 851,250
--------- -----------
2,964,625(4) $29,746,875(5)
========= ===========

</TABLE>

- ----------
(1) Reflects information as of March 25, 1997.

37
<PAGE>

(2) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants.
(3) Represents proceeds to the Company upon the exercise of the Warrants.
(4) Includes 40,000 Warrants in the aggregate issued to Mr. DeVoe and Mr. Jones
in connection with joining the Board of Directors.
(5) Includes proceeds of $517,500 from Warrants issued to Mr. DeVoe and Mr.
Jones. See Footnote 4.

Exercise of the Warrants is largely a function of the spread between the
trading price of the Company's Common Stock and the exercise price of the
Warrants. Thus, there can be no assurances that the future trading prices of the
Company's Common Stock will be sufficient to encourage the exercise of a
material number of the Warrants in the near term, if at all.

Exercise of the Warrants is also a function of other factors such as the
term of the Warrant and any associated rights of redemption. Substantially all
of the outstanding Warrants remain outstanding until 1998 and 1999, and some
remain outstanding until 2001. In addition, certain of the Warrants contain
features that permit redemption (at $.001 per Warrant) based upon average
trading prices of the Company's Common Stock between $15 and $25. Any call for
redemption will have the likely effect of causing the exercise of these
Warrants.

Securitization of Loan Contracts. Securitization of Loan Contracts is
an integral part of the Company's continuing financing strategy. Securitization:
(i) provides a lower cost of financing; (ii) allows the Company to increase its
liquidity; (iii) provides for redeployment of capital; (iv) reduces risks
associated with interest rate fluctuations; (v) reduces credit risk; and (vi)
properly matches the duration of the financing to the assets financed. The
Company uses the net proceeds from a securitization to repay the advances
outstanding under its Warehouse Facility, thereby creating availability to
purchase additional Loan Contracts. Through March 26, 1997, the Company
completed six securitization transactions totaling approximately $370.8 million.
The following is a summary of the basic structure of the Company's
securitization transactions through March 1997. There can be no assurances,
however, that the Company will continue to use this structure for future
securitization transactions.

The Company transfers a pool of Loan Contracts to a trust (the "Trust"),
which simultaneously issues one or more classes of securities (the "Securities")
backed by the assets of the Trust. The assets of the Trust include the Loan
Contracts and a reserve account. Initially, the Company makes a deposit into the
reserve account; and thereafter it maintains the reserve account at certain
levels (the "Maintenance Level") during the life of the securitization by
depositing certain cash flows from the Trust that the Company would otherwise
have received. The Company continues to service the Loan Contracts and earns a
contractual servicing fee, currently equal to 3.0% per year (the "Contractual
Servicing Fee").

The Securities were rated "A", "BBB" and "BB" in the first three
securitization transactions and "A" and "BBB" in the last two securitizations by
Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co. and Fitch Investors Service, L.P., and are sold
to investors in a private offering. These Securities carry fixed interest rate
coupons, payable quarterly. Generally, all collections of interest and principal
from Loan Contracts are used to pay interest due on the Securities and to reduce
the principal balance of the Securities. Collections of interest in excess of
that required to pay for (i) the interest due on the Securities, (ii) ongoing
fees and expenses of the Trust, and (iii) the Contractual Servicing Fees (the
"Excess Servicing Cash Flows") are deposited into the reserve account only to
the extent necessary to maintain it at the required Maintenance Level. The
remaining Excess Servicing Cash Flows, if any, are paid to the Company. In the
event that the collections of interest and principal from the Loan Contracts are
not sufficient to cover the required distributions of interest and principal on
the Securities, the trustee may withdraw funds from the reserve account to make
up for the shortfall.

The Company recognizes a gain on sale of the Loan Contracts from the
securitization in an amount equal to (i) the Excess Servicing Receivable from
the Trust during the life of the securitization, plus (ii) the net proceeds
received from the securitization less the aggregate book value of the Loan
Contracts transferred to the Trust. The Excess Servicing Receivable represents
the present value of the Excess Servicing Cash Flows after taking into account
the Company's estimates for the net credit loss and prepayment on the Loan
Contracts in the Trust.

38
<PAGE>

The gain on sale through securitization has been a significant component
of the Company's revenues in each of the quarters in which the securitization
transactions have been completed. Management believes that such gain on sale
will continue to represent a significant source of the Company's revenues in all
financial reporting periods in which the Company completes a securitization. If,
for any reason whatsoever, the Company is unable to complete a securitization
during a quarter, the Company's revenues for such period would decline. Also,
failure to complete a securitization of the Loan Contracts or delays in
completing such securitization could further subject the Company to interest
rate risk since the Company finances the Loan Contracts through a floating
interest rate Warehouse Facility.

The Company continues to explore alternative structures for the
securitization of its Loan Contracts in order to achieve a lower cost of
financing and to maximize the net proceeds from the securitization. Management
believes that it would lower the cost of financing by structuring the
securitization in a manner that results in the issuance of triple-A rated
Securities backed by the assets of the Trust, and then by selling such
Securities in a public offering. However, there can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to achieve this in the near future.

Public Offering Of Common Stock. In December 1996, the Company
completed an underwritten, secondary public offering of 2,500,000 shares of
Common Stock at $7.50 per share, which yielded net proceeds of approximately
$17.6 million. In January 1997, the Company's underwriters exercised their over
allotment option to purchase an additional 375,000 shares of Common Stock at
$7.50 per share. The net proceeds to the Company from this sale was
approximately $2.6 million.

Uses of Liquidity and Capital Resources:

Purchase and Financing of Contracts. Purchasing of Contracts represents
the most significant cash requirement. The Company funds the purchase price of
Loan Contracts primarily through its warehouse and credit facilities. However,
because advance rates under the these facilities generally provide for
approximately 80% to 90% of the principal of Loan Contracts, the Company is
required to fund the remainder of the purchase price with other available cash
resources.

The Company funds the purchase price of Lease Contracts primarily
through the $25 million GECC Facility. At December 31, 1996, approximately $24.4
million was outstanding under the GECC Facility. The Company has applied for an
increase in this facility to accommodate the growth in the Lease Contract
portfolio. The Company has financed the acquisition of approximately $4 million
of new Lease Contracts through equity capital at March 25, 1997. In addition,
the Company is currently exploring other financing sources and alternatives
relative to the acquisition of new Lease Contracts.

39
<PAGE>

The Company has acquired loans under its Recourse Loan Program for which
it is arranging permanent financing. At March 25, 1997, the Company had loans
outstanding under the program totaling approximately $4.5 million which had been
acquired using the Company's equity capital and for which it is negotiating
permanent financing.

Securitization of Loan Contracts. In connection with the Company's
securitization of Loan Contracts, the Company is required to fund cash reserve
accounts as credit enhancements to the transactions. The Company funds the
reserve accounts through a combination of an initial cash deposit upon the close
of each transaction, and through the capture of servicing fees and excess
servicing cash flow until these reserve accounts reach predetermined levels. The
amount of time required to fully fund each reserve account is dependent on
numerous factors, including, but not limited to (i) the size of the initial
deposit, (ii) the net interest rate spread, (iii) delinquencies and defaults,
and (iv) liquidation of repossessed inventory. Currently, all of the reserve
accounts related to the Company's securitizations are building to their required
levels. Until such required level is achieved, however, the Company is
prohibited from receiving its distribution of contractual and excess servicing
cash flows. The Trusts had $14.1 million in restricted cash held in such reserve
accounts at December 31, 1996.

The predetermined level of each reserve account within the
securitization trusts may be increased upon the occurrence of certain trigger
events, which relate to delinquency, repossession or credit loss rates exceeding
certain levels. Under the terms of the securitization transactions, the
Company's right to receive cash flows is restricted until a higher level in the
reserve account is achieved and/or the events that cause the trigger events
cease to occur for a specified period. The occurrence of trigger events
adversely affects the Company's liquidity. Three of the Company's
securitizations have experienced trigger events. Accordingly, the Company's
rights to receive contractual and excess servicing cash flows have been
suspended from these three securitizations until such time as the trigger events
and/or the required level of reserve account is achieved.

Repossession Inventory. At December 31, 1996, the Company's level of
inventory held for sale, including inventory held for securitizations, was
approximately $5.9 million. The rate of liquidation of repossessed inventory
impacts cash available to fund the Company's operations. In addition, the
inventory turnover rate also impacts the ability to fund reserve accounts within
the securitizations, and consequently, the excess cash available for ultimate
distribution to the Company.

Acquisition of SFI. In June 1996, the Company purchased certain assets
constituting the business of SFI pursuant to the exercise of an option agreement
entered into on August 1, 1995 for the purchase price of $1,000,000, plus
125,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock and options to purchase 65,000
shares of Common Stock at $6.00 per share. The option price of $250,000 paid on
August 1, 1995 was credited against the purchase price. This acquisition was
recorded utilizing the purchase method of accounting and the Company recognized
goodwill in the amount of $3.8 million. In conjunction with the acquisition, the
Company entered into a management agreement with the former principals of SFI
and retained substantially all of its operating personnel. Since the
acquisition, SFI has continued to generate Loan Contract volume comparable to
historic levels. While management believes that such levels of Contract volume
will continue, there can be no assurances to that effect.

Stockholder Financing. During June and December 1996, the Company repaid
outstanding stockholder loans in the amount of approximately $2.9 million and
$2.4 million, respectively. See "ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS - Loans to the Company."

Effects of Inflation

40
<PAGE>

Inflationary pressures may have an effect on the Company's internal
operations and on its overall business. The Company's operating costs are
subject to general economic and inflationary pressures. Operating costs have
increased during the past years due primarily to the expansion of the Company's
operations. The Company's business is subject to risk of inflation. Significant
increases in interest rates that are normally associated with strong periods of
inflation may have an impact upon the number of individuals that are likely or
able to finance the purchase or lease of an automobile.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1996, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 125 ("SFAS No. 125"), "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 125 provides
accounting and reporting standards for transfers and servicing of financial
assets and extinguishment of liabilities based on a financial-components
approach that focuses on control. SFAS No. 125 is effective for transfers and
servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after
December 31, 1996 and is to be prospectively applied. However, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 127, "Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Provisions of SFAS No.
125 and amendment of FASB Statement No. 125", defers, for one year, certain
provisions of SFAS No. 125. This deferral does not include the provisions of
SFAS No. 125 which relate to securitizations. Management does not anticipate a
significant impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 125 on the Company's financial
position and results of operations.

In February 1997, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" ("SFAS No. 128") and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 129, "Disclosure of Information about Capital
Structure" ("SFAS No. 129"). SFAS No. 128 establishes standards for computing
and presenting earnings per share. SFAS No. 129 establishes standards for
disclosing information about an entity's capital structure. These statements are
effective for financial statements issued for periods ending after December 15,
1997. Management does not expect the adoption of these statements to have a
significant impact on the financial position and results of operations of the
Company.

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Financial Statements of the Company for the years ended December 31,
1996 and 1995, and specific supplementary financial information are included
within Item 13(A) and 13(B) of this Report and may be found at pages F-1 through
F-29.

<PAGE>

ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

There are no matters to be reported hereunder.

PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS COMPLIANCE
WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Positions with the Company
- ---- --- --------------------------

<S> <C> <C>
Robert R. Bartolini 53 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of NAL; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of NAC

John T. Schaeffer 50 Director and Executive Vice President of NAL;
Director, President and Chief Operating Officer of NAC

Robert J. Carlson 41 Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer of
NAL and NAC

Dennis R. LaVigne 52 Vice President and Treasurer of NAL and NAC

Ngaire E. Cuneo(1)(2) 45 Director

James F. DeVoe(1)(2) 52 Director

David R. Jones(1)(2) 48 Director

</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Member of Audit Committee.
(2) Member of Compensation Committee.

The Company's Certificate of Incorporation provides for the division of
the Board of Directors into three classes, with each class to be as nearly equal
in number of directors as possible. At each annual meeting of the stockholders,
the successors to the class of directors whose term expires at the time are
elected to hold office for a term of three years and until their respective
successors are elected and qualified, so that the term of one class of directors
expires at each such annual meeting. The terms of office expire as follows: Ms.
Cuneo and Mr. DeVoe, 1997; Mr. Jones and Mr. Schaeffer, 1998; and Mr. Bartolini,
1999.

Officers are elected by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board of
Directors. There are no family relationships among the directors or executive
officers. In August 1995 the Company established an Audit Committee, and in May
1996 the Company established a Compensation Committee.

The following is a summary of the business experience of the Company's
directors and executive officers during the past five years and their
directorships, if any, with companies with a class of securities registered with
the Securities and Exchange Commission:

Robert R. Bartolini. Mr. Bartolini has been Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company since its inception in 1991 and became President in
conjunction with the Merger in November 1994. Prior to founding NAL Financial
Group Inc., he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Financial Federal
Savings & Loan Association ("FinFed" - Miami, Florida), a $1.8 billion mutual
savings and loan. From 1984 to 1987, Mr. Bartolini was Executive Vice President
at CenTrust Savings Bank, an $11 billion institution based in Miami, Florida,
with 60 branches. Prior to 1984, Mr. Bartolini was with First Pennsylvania Bank,
NA (assets of $6 billion; 75 branches), where he served as Senior Vice
President. Mr. Bartolini serves as a member of the Board of Directors of J.D.
Byrider Systems, Inc., from which the Company operates the JDBR Franchise.

John T. Schaeffer. Mr. Schaeffer has been President and Chief Operating
Officer of NAC since its inception. He became a director of the Company in

42
<PAGE>

conjunction with the Merger and became Executive Vice President in May 1996.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Schaeffer was President and Chief Operating
Officer of FinancialFed Services, Inc., the automobile lease origination and
servicing unit of FinFed. From 1986 through 1989, Mr. Schaeffer was Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of CenTrust Leasing Corporation, the
leasing unit of CenTrust Savings Bank, where he was responsible for the overall
activities of the leasing subsidiary. Prior to 1986, he was with First
Pennsylvania Bank, N.A., where he served as Vice President for 16 years.

Robert J. Carlson. Mr. Carlson has been Vice President and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company since April 1992. Prior to joining the Company
in 1992, Mr. Carlson served four years as Senior Vice President - Controller of
FinFed. Prior to 1992, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Miami Savings Bank, a $175 million asset savings institution in
Miami, Florida. Mr. Carlson also served three years at CenTrust as Vice
President - Accounting Operations and Reporting, and six years as an auditor at
Deloitte Haskins & Sells (now Deloitte & Touche LLP). He is a certified public
accountant and holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in business administration
from the University of Florida.

Dennis R. LaVigne. Mr. LaVigne has been Vice President and Treasurer of
the Company since August 1995. Mr. LaVigne has substantial experience in the
automobile finance industry, having served as Senior Vice-President of Union
Acceptance Corporation (an automobile finance company) from December 1993 to
September 1994; an independent consultant to the industry from October 1994 to
August 1995; and having previously served as Senior Vice President
Asset/Liability Manager of Union Federal Savings Bank of Indianapolis from 1989
to December 1993. Prior to joining Union Federal, Mr. LaVigne held positions
with Columbia Savings, a federal savings and loan association, from 1981 to
1989, including Senior Vice President, Chief Investment Officer, Treasurer and
Asset/Liability Committee Chairman. Mr. LaVigne holds a Ph.D. in economics from
the University of Illinois.

Ngaire E. Cuneo. Ms. Cuneo has been a director of the Company since
April 1996. She has been Executive Vice President, Corporate Development, of
Conseco, Inc., a financial services holding company, since 1992. From 1986 to
1992, Ms. Cuneo was Senior Vice President and Corporate Officer of General
Electric Capital Corporation. Ms. Cuneo is also a director of Conseco, Inc.,
Bankers Life Holding Corporation, American Life Holdings, Inc., American Life
Holding Company and Duke Realty Investments, Inc. See "Material Stockholder
Arrangements."

James F. DeVoe. Mr. DeVoe has been a director of the Company since March
1996. He is the founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of J.D. Byrider Systems, Inc. ("J.D. Byrider"), a used
vehicle-operation franchiser since 1989 with 86 franchised and 4 company-owned
locations in 28 states. The Company operates the JDBR Franchise as a franchisee
of J.D. Byrider. Mr. DeVoe has been President and Chairman of the Board of DeVoe
Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc., an automobile dealership, since 1975. Mr. DeVoe holds
a Bachelor of Science Degree and a Masters Degree in business from Indiana
University.

David R. Jones. Mr. Jones has been a director of the Company since
February 1996. He has been President and Chief Executive Officer of DR Jones
Financial, Inc., a privately-held consulting firm since its formation in
September 1995. Prior to forming DR Jones Financial, Inc., Mr. Jones was Senior
Vice President - Asset Backed Finance of Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc. from
1989 to 1995. Mr. Jones served as a Managing Director of The First Boston
Corporation, an investment banking firm, from 1982 to 1989 and as Manager -
Product Development of General Electric Credit Corp., an asset-based lender and
financial services company, from 1981 to 1982. Mr. Jones is a graduate of
Harvard College and has a Masters Degree in business administration from The
Amos Tuck School of Business Administration.

<PAGE>

Directors' Fees

The employee-directors of the Company receive no fees or other
compensation in connection with their services as directors. Mr. Jones and Mr.
DeVoe were each granted Warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock in connection with joining the Board of Directors. See "ITEM 10.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION - Stock Option Plans." The non-employee directors each
receive $1,000 for each meeting of the Board and any committee meeting attended
in person and $500 for each meeting attended telephonically.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires directors
and certain officers of the Company, as well as persons who own more than 10% of
a registered class of the corporation's equity securities ("Reporting Persons"),
to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4, and 5 with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company believes that during the
year ended December 31, 1996 all Reporting Persons timely complied with all
filing requirements applicable to them.

<PAGE>
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE Annual Compensation(1) Long-Term Compensation
-------------------------------------------------------------
Awards Payouts
------------------------------
Securities
Salary Bonus Underlying All Other
Name and Position Year ($) ($) Options/SARs(#) Compensation
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert R. Bartolini 1996 $300,000 $0 0 $30,900(6)
Chairman of the Board, President and 1995 $300,000 $0 50,000(4) $30,900(6)
Chief Executive Officer of NAL; 1994 $281,916 $298,985 75,000(2) $30,900(6)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of NAC

John T. Schaeffer 1996 $160,000 $0 0 $10,300(6)
Director and Executive Vice President 1995 $160,000 $0 25,000(4) $10,300(6)
of NAL; President and Chief Operating 1994 $160,000 $0 40,000(3) $10,300(6)
Officer of NAC

Robert J. Carlson 1996 $80,000 $0 0 $0
Vice President and Principal Accounting 1995 $80,000 $0 15,000(4) $0
Officer of NAL and NAC 1994 $74,231 $86,015 15,000(3) $0

Dennis R. LaVigne 1996 $150,000 $0 0 $0
Vice President and Treasurer of NAL 1995 $48,461 $0 25,000(5) $0
and NAC

</TABLE>

- ----------

(1) Based upon the fiscal years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.

(2) Represents stock options granted as of December 15, 1994 pursuant to the
Company's Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "1994 Plan"), of
which 66,666 options vest pro-rata over four years commencing January 1,
1996 and 8,334 options vest pro-rata over three years commencing January 1,
1996.

(3) Represents stock options granted as of December 15, 1994 pursuant to the
1994 Plan, which vest pro-rata over three years commencing January 1, 1996.

(4) Represents stock options granted as of December 6, 1995 pursuant to the 1994
Plan, which vest pro-rata over three years commencing January 1, 1997.

(5) Represents stock options granted as of December 6, 1995 pursuant to the 1994
Plan, which vest on December 6, 1998.

(6) Represents insurance premiums on whole life insurance policies paid by the
Company for the benefit of the named executive officer.

The Company did not grant any options to purchase Common Stock to the
named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 1996.

45
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

AGGREGATED OPTIONS/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FY- END OPTIONS/SAR VALUES

Number of Securities Value
Underlying of Unexercised
Shares Unexercised Options/SARs In-the-Money Options/SARs
Acquired at FY-End (#) at FY-End($)
Name on Exercise(#) Value Realized Exercisable/Unexercisable(1) Exercisable/Unexercisable(1)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert R. Bartolini, -0- -0- 19,445(E)/105,555(U) $60,584(E)/$171,667(U)
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of NAL;
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of NAC

John T. Schaeffer -0- -0- 13,333(E)/51,667(U) $48,400(E)/$96,800(U)
Director and Executive Vice President
of NAL; President and Chief Operating
Officer of NAC

Robert J. Carlson -0- -0- 5,000(E)/25,000(U) $18,150(E)/$36,300(U)
Vice President and Principal Accounting
Officer of NAL and NAC

Dennis R. LaVigne -0- -0- 0(E)/25,000(U) $0(E)/$0(U)
Vice President and Treasurer of NAL
and NAC
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Based upon the closing price of the Company's Common Stock ($9.63 per share)
as of December 31, 1996 on the Nasdaq National Market.

Employment Arrangements

Effective November 30, 1994, the Company entered into an employment
agreement with Mr. Robert R. Bartolini. Such agreement, as subsequently amended,
provides for a base salary of $300,000 per year together with discretionary
bonuses, if any, to be declared by the Board of Directors. The agreement also
provides for certain benefits, including vacation, life and disability
insurance, use of an automobile and certain related expenses, certain other
expenses and stock option plan participation, as well as a confidentiality
agreement and a two-year noncompetition agreement in favor of the Company. This
agreement provides for an initial term of three years and is annually renewable
for successive three-year periods unless either Mr. Bartolini or the Company
provides at least 60 days' notice of an intent not to renew. The agreement
provides that the Company may terminate Mr. Bartolini's employment at any time
with or without cause and that Mr. Bartolini may terminate the agreement upon
written notice on the earlier of one year from the date of such notice or 90
days after his replacement is hired by the Company. If Mr. Bartolini's
employment were to be terminated by the Company without cause, he generally
would receive his base salary and benefits for the remainder of the term of the
agreement. If he were to be terminated because substantially all of the assets
of the Company are sold or a controlling interest in the
Company is sold, Mr. Bartolini would receive an additional payment of 299% of
his base salary unless the agreement is assumed by the buyer or Mr. Bartolini is
offered substantially identical duties and compensation with the buyer for at
least the remaining term of the agreement. Mr. Bartolini may not cause the
agreement to terminate prior to three years from the date of the agreement.

Stock Option Plans

The Company's Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "1994
Plan") covers 1,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. Under its terms,
officers, directors, key employees and consultants of the Company are eligible
to receive incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code, as well as non-qualified stock options and stock
appreciation rights ("SARs"). The 1994 Plan is administered by the Board of
Directors or a committee consisting of no less than three members designated by
the Board of Directors. Incentive stock options granted under the 1994 Plan are
exercisable for a period of up to 10 years from the date of grant and at an
exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the Common Stock
on the date of the grant, except that the term of an incentive stock option
granted under the 1994 Plan to a stockholder owning more than 10% of the
outstanding Common Stock may not exceed five years and the exercise price of an
incentive stock option granted to such stockholder may not be less than 110% of
the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of the grant.
Non-qualified stock options may be granted on terms determined by the Board of
Directors or a committee designated by the Board of Directors. SARs, which give
the holder the privilege of surrendering such rights for the appreciation in the
Company's Common Stock between the time of grant and the surrender, may be
granted on any terms determined by the Board of Directors or committee
designated by the Board of Directors.

Incentive stock options granted under the 1994 Plan are
non-transferable, except upon death, by will or by operation of the laws of
descent and distribution, and may be exercised during the employee's lifetime
only by the optionee. There is no limit on the number of shares with respect to
which options may be granted under the 1994 Plan to any participating employee.
However, under the terms of the 1994 Plan, the aggregate fair market value
(determined as of the date of grant) of the shares of Common Stock with respect
to which incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by an
employee during any calendar year (under all such plans of the Company and any
parent and subsidiary corporation of the Company) may not exceed $100,000.

Options granted under the 1994 Plan may be exercised within 12 months
after the date of an optionee's termination of employment by reason of his death
or disability, or within three months after the date of termination by reason of
retirement or voluntary termination approved by the Board of Directors, but only
to the extent the option was otherwise exercisable at the date of termination.

The 1994 Plan provides that, in general, the Board of Directors or the
Administrative Committee of the 1994 Plan, shall, consistent with the Plan,
determine the terms and conditions, including vesting provisions, of any option
granted under the 1994 Plan, and may accelerate the exercisability of any
option.

The 1994 Plan will expire on November 1, 2004, unless terminated earlier
by the Board of Directors. The 1994 Plan may be amended by the Board of
Directors without stockholder approval, except that, in general, no amendment
that increases the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued under
the 1994 Plan, decreases the minimum exercise price of options provided under
the Plan, or changes the class of employees who are eligible to participate in
the 1994 Plan, shall be made without the approval of a majority of the
stockholders of the Company.

As of March 25, 1997, the Company had 500,166 options outstanding. The
outstanding options include 245,000 options granted to executive officers. See
"Options/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year Table." The outstanding options do not
include 65,000 options granted by the Company in connection

47
<PAGE>

with the exercise of the SFI purchase option. See "ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS."

The Company's Directors' 1996 Stock Option Plan (the "Directors' Plan")
covers 250,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock and provides for the grant
of non-qualified stock options and related SARs to the Company's non-employee
directors. The Directors' Plan is administered by the Board of Directors or a
committee appointed by the Board of Directors consisting of at least three of
its members.

Options are granted at the discretion of and on such terms and
conditions as are determined by the Board of Directors at the time the option is
granted. Options granted under the Directors' Plan are exercisable at such
prices, times and in such amounts as the Board of Directors will determine, but
in no case will the exercise price be less than the fair market value of a share
of Common Stock on the date of grant. The Board of Directors may accelerate the
date or dates on which some or all of the options outstanding under the
Directors' Plan may be exercised.

Options granted under the Directors' Plan are non-transferable except
upon death, by will, or by operation of the laws of descent and distribution,
and may be exercised during the optionee's lifetime only by the optionee, or in
the case of the legal incapacity of the optionee, the optionee's legal
representative.

In the event a person ceases to be a director of the Company by reason
other than death, incapacity or for cause, options granted under the Directors'
Plan are exercisable only if and to the extent that they were exercisable on the
date of such termination, only within the 30-day period following such
termination and, in no event, after the expiration of the exercise period of the
particular option. If a director is terminated for cause, as determined by the
Board of Directors in its sole discretion, options granted under the Directors'
Plan shall be forfeited. Upon the death or legal incapacity of a director,
options previously granted under the Directors' Plan and exercisable on the date
of death or incapacity, as applicable, may be exercised within twelve months
after the date of death or in capacity, as applicable.

The Directors' Plan was approved by the Board of Directors of the
Company on November 20, 1996 and expires on November 20, 2006. The Directors'
Plan may be altered, suspended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any
time, provided that no change which would have a material adverse effect upon
any option previously granted will be made unless the consent of the optionee is
obtained. As of March 25, 1997, the Company had 40,000 options outstanding under
the Directors' Plan which were granted to Messrs. DeVoe (20,000) and Jones
(20,000).

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company
with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock as of
March 25, 1997 by: (i) each person (or group of affiliated persons) who is known
by the Company to own beneficially 5% or more of any class of the Company's
Common Stock; (ii) each of the Company's directors; (iii) the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and each of the named executive officers; and (iv) the
Company's directors and executive officers as a group.

48
<PAGE>

Shares Beneficially
Owned and of Record(1)
------------------------------
Name and Address Number Percent
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Robert R. Bartolini
500 Cypress Creek Road West, Suite 590 2,254,754(2) 21.48%
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

John T. Schaeffer
500 Cypress Creek Road West, Suite 590 331,581(3) 3.16%
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

Robert J. Carlson
500 Cypress Creek Road West, Suite 590 75,196(4) *
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

Dennis R. LaVigne
500 Cypress Creek Road West, Suite 590 --(5) *
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

Ngaire E. Cuneo
745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2700 --(6) *
New York, NY 10151

James F. DeVoe
5780 West 71st Street 20,000(7) *
Indianapolis, IN 46278

David R. Jones
2 Ocean Avenue 23,000(8) *
Scituate, MA 02066-1624

Conseco, Inc.
11815 N. Pennsylvania Street 2,028,333(9)(13) 16.26%
P.O. Box 1911
Carmel, IN 46032

Florence Karp
3418 Sansom Street 1,440,303(10) 12.25%
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Merrill Lynch Asset Management(13)
800 Scudders Mill Road 780,165(12)(13) 6.95%
Plainsboro, NJ 08536

All Directors and Officers
as a group (7 persons) 2,704,531 25.54%
</TABLE>

- ----------
*Represents less than 1%

(1) Except as otherwise indicated, includes total number of shares outstanding
and the number of shares that each person has the right to acquire within 60
days through the exercise of options, warrants or debentures, pursuant to
Item 403 of Regulation S-B and Rule 13d-3(d)(1), promulgated under the
Exchange Act. Percentage of ownership is based on 10,443,395 shares of
Common Stock outstanding as of March 25, 1997.

(2) Includes 1,886,245 shares held by Robert R. Bartolini and Marcia G.
Bartolini, Co-Trustees of the Robert R. Bartolini Revocable Trust dated July
27, 1992, 210,000 shares of which are subject to options granted by Mr.
Bartolini during May 1995. Also includes 48,931 shares presently held by
English, McCaughan & O'Bryan, P.A. pursuant to the terms of the Voting Trust
Agreement. See "Material Voting Arrangements." Includes 264,022 shares held
by Marcia G. Bartolini and Robert R. Bartolini, Co-Trustees of the Marcia G.
Bartolini Revocable Trust dated July 27, 1992. Does not include 50,000
shares owned beneficially by Edward M. Bartolini, the adult brother of
Robert R. Bartolini. Also does not include 264,022 shares held by George
Schnabel, Trustee of the Robert R. Bartolini and Marcia G. Bartolini
Irrevocable Trust dated July 27, 1992. Includes vested Incentive Stock
Options to purchase 55,556 shares of Common Stock granted in December 1994
and December 1995. Does not include Incentive Stock Options to purchase
69,444 shares of Common Stock granted in December 1994 and December 1995,
which have not vested. See "ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION."

(3) Includes 5,552 shares held by English McCaughan & O'Bryan, P.A. for the
benefit of Mr. Schaeffer pursuant to the terms of the Voting Trust
Agreement. See "Material Voting Arrangements." Includes

49
<PAGE>

35,001 vested Incentive Stock Options granted to Mr. Schaeffer in December
1994 and December 1995. Does not include 29,999 Incentive Stock Options
granted to Mr. Schaeffer in December 1994 and December 1995, which remain
subject to vesting. Includes 4,952 shares held by Mr. Schaeffer's spouse.
See "ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION".

(4) Includes 9,652 shares held by English, McCaughan & O'Bryan, P.A. for the
benefit of Mr. Carlson pursuant to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement.
See "Material Voting Arrangements." Includes 15,000 vested Incentive Stock
Options granted to Mr. Carlson in December 1994 and December 1995. Does not
include 15,000 Incentive Stock Options granted to Mr. Carlson in December
1994 and December 1995, which remain subject to vesting. See "ITEM 10.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION."

(5) Does not include 25,000 Incentive Stock Options granted to Mr. LaVigne in
December 1995, which remain subject to vesting. See "ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION."

(6) Ms. Cuneo joined the Board of Directors effective April 23, 1996 in
conjunction with the sale by the Company of certain Debentures. See
"Material Stockholder Arrangements."

(7) Includes Warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $11.50 per share granted to Mr. DeVoe in connection with his
appointment as a director on March 11, 1996.

(8) Includes 20,000 options granted to Mr. Jones in connection with his
appointment as a director on February 5, 1996, which have vested.

(9) Represents 515,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of Warrants held by
Conseco, Inc. Also includes 756,667 shares of Common Stock (666,667 shares
representing principal and 90,000 shares representing interest at maturity)
issuable upon conversion, if at all, of $5 million principal amount of
Debentures held by Great American Reserve Insurance Company ("GARCO") and
756,666 shares of Common Stock (666,666 shares representing principal and
90,000 shares representing interest at maturity) issuable upon the
conversion, if at all, of $5 million principal amount of Debentures held by
Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Company ("BSLIC"). GARCO and BSLIC are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Conseco, Inc. (the "Conseco Subsidiaries").
This table has been prepared assuming a fixed $7.50 conversion price for
the Debentures. Additional shares may be issued to the holders of the
Debentures upon conversion based on a conversion price equal to the lesser
of: (i) $7.50; and (ii) 80% of the closing bid price of the Company's
Common Stock on the date of conversion. If such Debentures were converted
based upon the closing price of $3.375 as of March 25, 1997, 2,690,370
additional shares would be issued to the holders.

(10) As custodian for Ms. Karp's minor grandchildren.

(11) Includes 103,333 shares of Common Stock. Also includes 625,000 shares of
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise, if at all, of Warrants. Includes
711,970 shares of Common Stock (560,606 shares representing principal and
151,364 shares representing interest at maturity) issuable upon the
conversion, if at all, of $5.5 million principal amount of Debentures. This
table has been prepared assuming a fixed $9.00 conversion price for $3.0
million principal amount of the Debentures. Additional shares may be issued
to the holder upon conversion based on a conversion price equal to the
lesser of: (i) $9.00 per share; and (ii) 75% of the closing bid price of
the Company's Common Stock on the date of conversion. If such Debentures
were converted on the basis of a market price of $3.375 as of March 25,
1997, 1,082,383 additional shares would be issued to the holder.

(12) Represents 366,667 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion, if at
all, of $2.75 million principal amount of Debentures and 62,425 shares of
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of Warrants held by Convertible
Holdings, Inc. Also represents 300,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
conversion, if at all, of $2.25 million principal amount of Debentures and
51,075 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of Warrants held
by Merrill Lynch World Income Fund, Inc. Convertible Holdings, Inc. is
advised by Merrill Lynch Asset Management, an investment adviser registered
under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("MLAM"). Merrill Lynch World
Income Fund, Inc. is advised by Fund Asset Management, Inc., an investment
adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("FAM"). FAM
and MLAM are affiliates and both disclaim beneficial ownership of the
Common Stock referred herein. This table has been prepared assuming a fixed
$7.50 conversion price for the Debentures. Additional shares may be issued
to the holders upon conversion based on a conversion price equal to the
lesser of: (i) $7.50 per share; and (ii) 80% of the closing bid price of
the Company's Common Stock on the date of conversion. If such Debentures
were converted based upon the closing price of $3.375 as of March 25, 1997,
1,185,185 additional shares would be issued to the holders.

50
<PAGE>

(13) In connection with the issuance of these Debentures and Warrants, the
Company granted price protection to the holder(s) such that in the event
the Company issues securities during the term of the Debentures and
Warrants at an issuance price of less than $7.50 per share, the conversion
price of such Debentures would be reduced to the lesser of: (i) the
issuance price of such securities; and (ii) 80% of the closing bid price of
the Company's Common Stock on the date of conversion. This provision may
result in the issuance of additional shares of Common Stock upon the
conversion of the Debentures and a decrease in the proceeds to the Company
upon the exercise of the Warrants. The exercise prices of the Warrants are
also adjustable on an immediate or cumulative basis, as applicable, based
upon the issuance price of such additional securities.

Material Voting Arrangements

Concurrent with the completion of the Merger, as of November 30, 1994,
Messrs. Bartolini, Schaeffer and Carlson entered into a Voting Trust Agreement
(the "Voting Trust Agreement") pursuant to which 400,000 shares were placed in a
voting trust. The Voting Trust Agreement provides that, on any matter requiring
stockholder vote, the trustee will vote such shares in the same percentage as
the other then issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are voted. Such
shares may be released from the Voting Trust Agreement pursuant to an earn-out
formula whereby for the years ended 1995, 1996 and 1997, 10,000 trust shares
will be released for each $150,000 of cumulative net income after taxes of the
Company up to $3,000,000 and 5,000 shares will be released for each $150,000 of
cumulative net income after taxes in excess of $3,000,000, less the number of
trust shares previously transferred to the stockholders under this formula. The
trust shares will be released pro rata in accordance with the number of trust
shares beneficially owned by each stockholder. As of September 30, 1996, all of
the shares had been earned. If the shares are not released pursuant to the
earn-out formula within three years, such shares will be canceled. The trustee
under the Voting Trust Agreement is English, McCaughan & O'Bryan, P.A., counsel
to the Company.

Material Stockholder Arrangements

In connection with the purchase of $10 million principal amount of
Debentures in April 1996, the Conseco Subsidiaries are entitled to designate a
nominee to the Company's Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors pursuant to the terms of the agreements governing such Debentures.
Ms. Ngaire E. Cuneo, an executive officer and director of Conseco and the
Conseco Subsidiaries, is the designated nominee. Pursuant to these arrangements,
Messrs. Bartolini and Schaeffer entered into a Stockholders' Agreement as of
April 23, 1996 with the Company, pursuant to which they agreed to certain
limitations upon the resale of their shares of Common Stock until October 1997.

51
<PAGE>

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Loans to the Company

Mr. Robert R. Bartolini, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, has on occasion provided advances at market interest rates to the
Company.

In order to provide it with additional working capital, Mr. Bartolini
advanced approximately $1.0 million to the Company on June 30, 1995 and later
increased this amount to approximately $2.9 million during December 1995. The
advance was repaid in full as of June 30, 1996. During November 1996, Mr.
Bartolini provided advances totaling $2,413,869 to the Company, which were
repaid as of December 31, 1996 from the proceeds of the Company's underwritten
secondary offering of Common Stock. These advances bore interest at a fixed rate
of 11%.

Transaction with Affiliate of Former Director

Mr. Andrew Panzo was a member of the Company's Board of Directors from
August 1995 until his resignation in March 1996. Following the Merger, American
Maple Leaf Financial Corporation ("AMLF"), an affiliate of Mr. Panzo, rendered
certain investment banking advisory services to the Company for which AMLF
received 33,000 common stock purchase warrants. The Warrants permit the purchase
of additional shares at an exercise price of $9.00 per share through the later
of May 1996 or the registration of the underlying shares of Common Stock.

During April 1995, AMLF purchased $1,200,000 principal amount of 9%
Convertible Subordinated Debenture Units for an aggregate purchase price of
$1,200,000. $810,000 principal amount of these Debenture Units, as well as the
accrued interest due thereon, was converted into 95,692 shares of the Company's
Common Stock during January 1996. The remaining principal amount of these
Debenture Units ($390,000) was converted in April 1996.

Sale of Boat to Executive Officer

In October 1994, the Company sold a repossessed boat to Mr. John T.
Schaeffer, a director of NAL and President and Chief Operating Officer of NAC,
in consideration for a note in the amount of $89,000, which bore interest at 10%
per annum for a period of one year, and the offset by the Company of $21,000
payable to Mr. Schaeffer. The note was repaid prior to June 30, 1995. In
management's opinion, the sale was at the approximate fair market value of the
boat.

Grant of Options and Warrants

In December 1994 and December 1995, the Company granted certain options
to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock to executive officers under the
Company's 1994 Plan. See "ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION." In conjunction with
the appointment of Mr. Jones to the Board of Directors on February 5, 1996, the
Company granted to him 20,000 options to purchase Common Stock purchase warrants
with an exercise price of $14.38 per share. In conjunction with the appointment
of Mr. DeVoe to the Board of Directors on March 11, 1996, the Company granted to
him 20,000 options to purchase Common Stock with an exercise price of $11.50 per
share. The options held by Messrs. DeVoe and Jones are covered by the Directors'
Plan.

52
<PAGE>

Relationship With J.D. Byrider Systems, Inc.

Mr. Bartolini, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
serves as a member of the Board of Directors of J.D. Byrider, from which the
Company operates the JDBR Franchise. Mr. James F. DeVoe, a director of the
Company, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of J.D. Byrider.

Travel Services

IYS Travel, Inc. ("IYS"), a travel agency of which the spouse of Mr.
Robert Bartolini is a principal stockholder, provides business and personal
travel services to the Company and its employees at prevailing market prices.
IYS receives customary industry commissions from airlines, hotels, and cruise
agencies for services provided. During the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995, the Company paid IYS approximately $217,000 and $105,000, respectively,
for airline tickets booked by IYS for travel by the Company's employees at the
prevailing prices charged by the airlines.

PART IV

ITEM 13. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS AND REPORT ON FORM 8-K.
<TABLE>

<S> <C> <C>
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report: Page

1. Financial Statements filed as part of this Report:

Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants............................. F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31,
1996 and December 31, 1995..................................................... F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years
Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995............................................... F-3

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years
Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995............................................... F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
1996 and 1995.................................................................. F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements..................................... F-7
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

(b) The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report:

Exhibit No. Description Method of Filing
----------- ----------- ----------------

<S> <C> <C>
2.1 Merger Agreement between the shareholders of Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
NAL Financial Group Inc., NAL Financial Registrant's Form 8-K filed under the Exchange Act on
Group Inc., and the Registrant dated October December 8, 1994 (the "Form 8-K")
4, 1994 and as amended, November 30, 1994

3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant, as amended December 1, 1994 Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed
under the Securities Act on January 31, 1995, Registration
No. 33-88966 (the "January 1995 Registration Statement")

3.2 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the
Incorporation of the Registrant dated May Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
31, 1996 ended June 30, 1996 ("June 1996 10-QSB")

3.3 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the June 1996
Registrant dated May 31, 1996 10-QSB

4.1 Copy of Specimen Common Stock Certificate Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the January
1995 Registration Statement

4.2 Form of 9% Subordinated Convertible Debenture Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Registration No.
33-97948, filed on October 25, 1995 (the "October 1995
Registration Statement")

4.3 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the October
1995 Registration Statement

4.4 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the October
1995 Registration Statement

54
<PAGE>

4.5 Securities Purchase Agreement between NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the
Financial Group Inc., Beneficial Standard Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
Life Insurance Company and Great American ended March 31, 1996 ("March 1996 10-QSB")
Reserve Insurance Company dated as of April
23, 1996

4.6 9% Subordinated Convertible Debenture in the Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the March 1996
principal amount of $5,000,000 payable to 10-QSB
Great American Reserve Insurance Company

4.7 9% Subordinated Convertible Debenture in the Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the March 1996
principal amount of $5,000,000 payable to 10-QSB
Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Company

4.8 Common Stock Purchase Warrant granted to Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the March 1996
Conseco, Inc. ($12.625) 10-QSB

4.9 Common Stock Purchase Warrant granted to Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the March 1996
Conseco, Inc. ($14.52) 10-QSB

4.10 Stockholders' Agreement entered into as of Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the March 1996
April 23, 1996 among NAL Financial Group 10-QSB
Inc., Beneficial Standard Life Insurance
Company and Great American Reserve Insurance
Company

4.11 Registration Rights Agreement between NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the March 1996
Financial Group Inc. and Conseco, Inc. 10-QSB

4.12 Registration Rights Agreement between NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the March 1996
Financial Group Inc., Beneficial Standard 10-QSB
Life Insurance Company and Great American
Reserve Life Insurance Company

4.13 Form of Amended and Restated Registration Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the June 1996
Rights Agreement 10-QSB

55
<PAGE>

4.14 Securities Purchase Agreement between NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the
Financial Group Inc. and Merrill Lynch World Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
Income Fund, Inc. and Convertible Holdings, ended September 30, 1996 ("September 1996 10-QSB")
Inc. dated September 12, 1996

4.15 10% Subordinated Convertible Debenture in Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the September
the principal amount of $2,250,000 payable 10-QSB
to Bridge Rope & Co.

4.16 10% Subordinated Convertible Debenture in Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to the September
the principal amount of $2,750,000 payable 10-QSB
to Kane & Co.

4.17 Common Stock Purchase Warrant granted to Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to the September
Bridge Rope & Co. 10-QSB

4.18 Common Stock Purchase Warrant granted to Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to the September
Kane & Co. 10-QSB

4.19 Registration Rights Agreement between NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to the September
Financial Group Inc. and Merrill Lynch World 10-QSB
Income Fund, Inc. and Convertible Holdings,
Inc. dated September 12, 1996

9.1 Voting Trust Agreement by and among English, Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Form 8-K
McCaughan & O'Bryan, P.A., John T.
Schaeffer, Robert J. Carlson and The
Robert R. Bartolini Trust, dated
November 30, 1994

10.1 Loan and Security Agreement between Congress Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the January
Financial Corporation and the Registrant 1995 Registration Statement
dated March 16, 1993

10.2 Program Agreement between NAL Acceptance Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the October
Corporation and General Electric Capital 1995 Registration Statement
Auto Lease, Inc. dated July 1, 1995

10.3 Amended and Restated Loan and Security Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the January
Agreement between General Electric Capital 1995 Registration Statement
Corporation and NAL Acceptance Corporation
dated September 28, 1994

56
<PAGE>

10.4 Loan Purchase Agreement between Fairfax Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the January
Savings Bank and the Registrant dated 1995 Registration Statement
October 6, 1994

10.5 Participation Agreement between Fairfax Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the January
Savings, FSB and NAL Acceptance Corporation 1995 Registration Statement
dated December 14, 1993

10.6 Employment Agreement by and between the Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the October
Registrant and Robert R. Bartolini dated 1995 Registration Statement
November 30, 1994

10.7 Lease Agreement by and between NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the October
Acceptance Corporation and The Northwestern 1995 Registration Statement
Mutual Life Insurance Company dated
October 2, 1991, as modified by Lease
Modification Agreement #1 dated February
18, 1994 and Lease Modification Agreement #2
dated January 20, 1995

10.8 Lease Agreement by and between NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the October
Acceptance Corporation and The Northwestern 1995 Registration Statement
Mutual Life Insurance Company dated June 7,
1994 as modified by Lease Modification
Agreement #1 dated June 28, 1994, Lease
Modification Agreement #2 dated December 1,
1994 and Lease Modification Agreement #3
dated January 20, 1995

10.9 Modification Agreement # 4 dated July 1, Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the October
1995 to Lease Agreement by and between NAL 1995 Registration Statement
Acceptance Corporation and the Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company dated June 7,
1994

10.10 Master Repurchase Agreement between Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the October
Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. 1995 Registration Statement
and Autorics, Inc. dated September 5, 1995

10.11 Option to Purchase Assets of Special Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the October
Finance, Inc. dated August 1, 1995 1995 Registration Statement

57
<PAGE>

10.12 Receivables Purchase Agreement among NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to
Acceptance Corporation, Autorics II, Inc. Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the October 1995
and Autorics, Inc. dated December 1, 1995 Registration Statement

10.13 Sale and Servicing Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to
Trust 1995-1 and Autorics II, Inc., NAL Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the October 1995
Acceptance Corporation and Bankers Trust Registration Statement
Company dated December 1, 1995

10.14 Indenture between NAL Auto Trust 1995-1 and Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to
Bankers Trust Company dated December 1, 1995 Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the October 1995
Registration Statement

10.15 Administration Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to
Trust 1995-1, NAL Acceptance Corporation, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the October 1995
and Bankers Trust Company dated December 1, Registration Statement
1995

10.16 Trust Agreement between Autorics II, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to
and Wilmington Trust dated December 1, 1995 Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the October 1995
Registration Statement

10.17 Certificate Purchase Agreement between Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
Autorics II, Inc. and NAL Acceptance Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the October 1995
Corporation dated December 20, 1995 Registration Statement

10.18 Note Purchase Agreement between Autorics II, Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to
Inc. and NAL Acceptance Corporation dated Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the October 1995
December 20, 1995 Registration Statement

10.19 Receivables Purchase Agreement among NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the March
Acceptance Corporation, Autorics, Inc. and 1996 10-QSB
Autorics II, Inc. dated as of March 8, 1996

10.20 Sales and Servicing Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the March
Trust 1996-1, Autorics II, Inc., NAL 1996 10-QSB
Acceptance Corporation and Bankers Trust
Company dated as of March 8, 1996

58
<PAGE>

10.21 Indenture between NAL Auto Trust 1996-1 and Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the March
Bankers Trust Company dated as of March 8, 1996 10-QSB
1996

10.22 Trust Agreement between Autorics II, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the March
and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of 1996 10-QSB
March 8, 1996

10.23 Administration Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the June 1996
Trust 1996-2, NAL Acceptance Corporation, 10-QSB
and Bankers Trust Company dated June 17, 1996

10.24 Receivables Purchase Agreement among NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the June 1996
Acceptance Corporation, Autorics, Inc. and 10-QSB
Autorics II, Inc. dated as of June 17, 1996

10.25 Sales and Servicing Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the June 1996
Trust 1996-2, Autorics II, Inc., NAL 10-QSB
Acceptance Corporation and Bankers Trust
Company dated as of June 17, 1996

10.26 Indenture between NAL Auto Trust 1996-2 and Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the June 1996
Bankers Trust Company dated as of June 17, 10-QSB
1996

10.27 Trust Agreement between Autorics II, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the June 1996
and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of 10-QSB
June 17, 1996

10.28 Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Registrant's
of the Registrant Proxy Statement filed under the Exchange Act on May 2, 1996

10.29 Administration Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the September
Trust 1996-3, NAL Acceptance Corporation and 1996 10-QSB
Bankers Trust Company dated as of September
11, 1996

10.30 Receivables Purchase Agreement among NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the September
Acceptance Corporation, Autorics, Inc. and 1996 10-QSB
Autorics II, Inc. dated as of September 11,
1996

59
<PAGE>

10.31 Sale and Servicing Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the September
Trust 1996-3, Autorics II, Inc., NAL 1996 10-QSB
Acceptance Corporation and Bankers Trust
Company dated as of September 11, 1996

10.32 Indenture between NAL Auto Trust 1996-3 and Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the September
Bankers Trust Company dated as of September 1996 10-QSB
11, 1996

10.33 Trust Agreement between Autorics II, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the September
and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of 1996 10-QSB
September 11, 1996

10.34 Form of Custody Agreement and Power of Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Pre-effective
Attorney between each Selling Stockholder, Amendment No. 1 to the November 1996 Registration Statement
Robert R. Bartolini as Attorney-in-Fact and
Stock Trans, Inc. as Custodian

10.35 Form of Lock-Up Agreement between certain Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Pre-effective
Debenture holders and certain Warrant Amendment No. 1 to the November 1996 Registration Statement
holders and Prudential Securities
Incorporated, Piper Jaffray Inc. and Sands
Brothers & Co., Ltd.

10.36 Directors' 1996 Stock Option Plan of the Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Pre-effective
Registrant Amendment No. 2 to the November 1996 Registration Statement

10.37 Administration Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Pre-effective
Trust 1996-4, NAL Acceptance Corporation and Amendment No. 2 to the November 1996 Registration Statement
Bankers Trust Company dated as of December
9, 1996

10.38 Receivables Purchase Agreement among NAL Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to Pre-effective
Acceptance Corporation, Autorics, Inc. and Amendment No. 2 to the November 1996 Registration Statement
Autorics II, Inc. dated as of December 9,
1996

10.39 Sale and Servicing Agreement among NAL Auto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Pre-effective
Trust 1996-4, Autorics II, Inc., NAL Amendment No. 2 to the November 1996 Registration Statement
Acceptance Corporation and Bankers Trust
Company dated as of December 9, 1996

60
<PAGE>

10.40 Indenture between NAL Auto Trust 1996-4 and Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to Pre-effective
Bankers Trust Company dated as of December Amendment No. 2 to the November 1996 Registration Statement
9, 1996

10.41 Trust Agreement between Autorics II, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to Pre-effective
and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of Amendment No. 2 to the November 1996 Registration Statement
December 9, 1996

11 Statement re: computation of per share Filed herewith
earnings

21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the November
1996 Registration Statement

23.1 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP Filed herewith

23.2 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP Filed herewith

27 Financial Data Schedule Filed herewith
</TABLE>

61
<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets
all the requirements of filing on Form 10-KSB, and has duly caused this Form
10-KSB to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized
on the 28th day of March, 1997.

NAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.

BY: /s/ Robert R. Bartolini
-----------------------------------------
Robert R. Bartolini
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Form 10-KSB has been signed by the following persons in the capacity and on
the dates indicated.

Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----

/s/ Robert R. Bartolini Chairman of the Board, March 28, 1997
- ---------------------------- President and Chief Executive
Robert R. Bartolini Officer of NAL; Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
of NAC

/s/ John T. Schaeffer Director and Executive Vice March 28, 1997
- ---------------------------- President of NAL; Director,
John T. Schaeffer President and Chief Operating
Officer of NAC

/s/ Robert J. Carlson Vice President and Principal March 28, 1997
- ---------------------------- Accounting Officer of NAL
Robert J. Carlson and NAC

/s/ James F. DeVoe Director March 28, 1997
- ----------------------------
James F. DeVoe

/s/ David R. Jones Director March 28, 1997
- ----------------------------
David R. Jones

/s/ Ngaire E. Cuneo Director March 28, 1997
- ----------------------------
Ngaire E. Cuneo

<PAGE>

Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of NAL Financial Group Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related
consolidated statements of operations, of changes in stockholders' equity and of
cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
NAL Financial Group Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed
above.

/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
February 24, 1997, except as to Note 17,
which is as of March 26, 1997

F-1
<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Finance receivables $ 73,627,307 $ 103,885,207
Less: reserves available for credit losses (5,851,595) (2,671,001)
------------- -------------
Finance receivables, net 67,775,712 101,214,206
------------- -------------
Cash 6,781,442 920,981
Restricted cash 1,237,065 1,031,734
Accrued interest receivable 619,858 1,014,500
Investment in operating leases, net 14,822,361 4,054,613
Automobile inventory, net 2,141,037 1,886,451
Property and equipment, net 2,513,405 1,802,889
Servicing receivables, net 41,598,078 5,544,553
Goodwill, net 3,535,258 --
Debt issue costs, net 2,114,337 856,736
Other assets 6,646,231 3,708,263
------------- -------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 149,784,784 $ 122,034,926
============= =============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Debt participation interests $ 3,145,186 $ 42,380,522
Credit and warehouse facilities 52,022,782 33,428,946
Convertible subordinated debt, net 24,873,440 12,924,379
Stockholder loans -- 2,919,000
Drafts payable 2,866,909 2,593,098
Deferred taxes 5,798,689 1,603,587
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 2,090,617 1,046,884
Other liabilities 2,609,052 1,278,594
------------- -------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 93,406,675 98,175,010
------------- -------------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) -- --
------------- -------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock - $1,000 par value:
10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued -- --
Common stock - $.15 par value:
50,000,000 shares authorized
1996 - 9,847,367 shares issued and outstanding
1995 - 6,699,987 shares issued and outstanding 1,477,105 1,004,998
Paid in capital 43,303,003 18,524,706
Retained earnings 11,598,001 4,330,212
------------- -------------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 56,378,109 23,859,916
------------- -------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 149,784,784 $ 122,034,926
============= =============
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.

F-2
<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
INTEREST INCOME
Finance charges and purchase discount accretion $ 23,142,086 $ 15,680,198
Interest expense (10,953,694) (7,361,527)
------------ ------------
Net interest income before provision for credit losses 12,188,392 8,318,671
Provision for credit losses (5,477,291) (2,762,273)
------------ ------------
Net interest income after provision for credit losses 6,711,101 5,556,398
------------ ------------
OTHER INCOME
Gain on sale of contracts 19,872,389 4,600,721
Servicing fees, net 1,699,493 100,288
Insurance fees 2,915,805 547,894
Other fees 3,497,425 2,003,315
------------ ------------
Total other income 27,985,112 7,252,218
------------ ------------

OPERATING AND OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits 10,238,865 2,551,486
Depreciation and amortization 1,867,181 1,298,866
Occupancy expense 1,086,939 448,625
Professional and consulting services 2,033,764 723,620
Telecommunications expense 1,084,658 343,568
Other operating expenses 6,185,301 2,439,066
Non-cash charge for the release of escrow shares 300,764 280,000
------------ ------------
Total operating and other expenses 22,797,472 8,085,231
------------ ------------
Income before income taxes 11,898,741 4,723,385
Provision for income taxes 4,630,952 1,926,321
------------ ------------
NET INCOME $ 7,267,789 $ 2,797,064
============ ============
Primary net income per common and common
equivalent share $ 0.94 $ 0.45
============ ============
Fully diluted net income per common and common
equivalent share $ 0.86 $ 0.45
============ ============

</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.

F-3
<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Preferred Stock Common Stock
------------------ ---------------------- Total
Par Par Paid in Retained Stockholders'
Shares Value Shares Value Capital Earnings Equity
------ ----- ------ ----- ------- -------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1994 -- $ -- 5,592,968 $ 838,945 $ 8,483,714 $ 1,533,148 $10,855,807
Issuance of stock -- -- 176,500 26,475 2,074,475 -- 2,100,950
Issuance of warrants -- -- -- -- 397,167 -- 397,167
Conversion of subordinated
debt -- -- 930,519 139,578 7,289,350 -- 7,428,928
Release of escrow shares -- -- -- -- 280,000 -- 280,000
Net income -- -- -- -- -- 2,797,064 2,797,064
------ ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1995 -- -- 6,699,987 1,004,998 18,524,706 4,330,212 23,859,916

Issuance of stock -- -- 2,500,000 375,000 16,492,352 -- 16,867,352

Issuance of warrants -- -- -- -- 162,750 -- 162,750

Acquisition of SFI -- -- 125,000 18,750 2,234,910 -- 2,253,660

Conversion of subordinated
debt -- -- 522,380 78,357 5,587,521 -- 5,665,878

Release of escrow shares -- -- -- -- 300,764 -- 300,764

Net income -- -- -- -- -- 7,267,789 7,267,789
------ ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Balance, December 31, 1996 -- $ -- $ 9,847,367 $ 1,477,105 $43,303,003 $11,598,001 $56,378,109
====== ========== =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.

F-4
<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 7,267,789 $ 2,797,064
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash used in operating activities:
Accretion of discount -- (654,124)
Provision for loan losses 5,477,291 2,762,273
Depreciation and amortization 2,820,138 1,120,109
Amortization of servicing receivables 4,916,158 --
Depreciation of vehicles under operating leases 1,003,139 325,040
Gain on sale of contracts (19,872,389) (4,600,721)
Purchase of automobile finance contracts (308,993,904) (154,866,844)
Proceeds from securitization of automobile finance contracts 278,765,614 37,511,237
Repayments of participations and credit facilities (305,794,625) (81,870,973)
Proceeds from participations and credit facilities 284,994,869 135,178,400
Proceeds from servicing receivables 3,009,972 --
Non-cash charge for the release of escrow shares 300,764 280,000
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in servicing receivables (10,339,809) (5,544,553)
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash (205,331) 29,307
Increase in other assets (2,611,375) (3,414,319)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable 394,642 (846,808)
Increase in drafts payable 273,811 2,593,098
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 873,918 825,631
Increase in other liabilities 1,276,437 627,505
Increase in deferred taxes 4,195,102 1,493,127
---------------- -----------------
Net cash used in operating activities (52,247,789) (66,255,551)
---------------- -----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Cash paid for purchase of Special Finance Inc. (750,000) (250,000)
Proceeds from sale of loan pools -- 12,514,061
Purchase of operating lease vehicles (13,184,671) (3,400,690)
Payments received on automobile finance contracts 33,811,083 22,042,555
Payments received on consumer finance contracts 713,751 1,996,335
Purchase of consumer finance contracts (10,402) (1,050,549)
Payments received on mortgage finance contracts 523,743 2,587,063
Proceeds from sale of automobile inventory 9,710,680 8,845,103
Purchase of property and equipment (1,008,773) (1,535,671)
---------------- -----------------
Net cash provided by investing activities 29,805,411 41,748,207
---------------- -----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 16,867,352 2,100,950
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures 17,500,000 21,338,728
Payment of debt issue costs (2,940,543) (1,532,707)
Net (repayments) borrowings from stockholder (3,123,970) 2,856,506
---------------- -----------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 28,302,839 24,763,477
---------------- -----------------
Increase in cash 5,860,461 256,133
Cash, beginning of year 920,981 664,848
---------------- -----------------
Cash, end of year $ 6,781,442 $ 920,981
================ =================
</TABLE>

(Continued)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Cont'd
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1996 1995

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the year for interest $ 9,251,670 $ 6,443,859
=========== ===========

Cash paid during the year for taxes $ 835,475 $ 491,558
=========== ===========
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing
and financing activities:

Conversion of subordinated debt $ 5,665,878 $ 7,428,928
=========== ===========

Net transfers to automobile inventory $ 9,428,192 $11,742,181
=========== ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.

F-6
<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Organization and Nature of Operations

NAL Financial Group Inc. (the "Company") is a consumer finance company,
specializing in the origination, purchase, securitization and servicing of
automobile loan and lease receivables from franchised and independent
automotive dealers in 23 states. The Company's borrowers generally would
not be expected to qualify for traditional financing such as that provided
by commercial banks or automobile manufacturers' captive finance
companies. Loans originated are subsequently sold through asset backed
securitization transactions.

The Company completed its initial securitization during December 1995. In
a securitization, the Company creates securities backed by automotive
finance contracts and sells these securities in privately placed
transactions. Purchasers of the securities receive a pass-through rate of
interest set at the time of sale and the Company receives a base servicing
fee for its servicing efforts. In addition, the Company is entitled to
certain excess servicing fees which represent collections on the contracts
in excess of those required to pay investor principal and interest and the
base servicing fee.

The Company operates its business through two wholly-owned subsidiaries,
NAL Acceptance Corporation ("NAC") and NAL Mortgage Corporation. The
principal operations of the Company are conducted through NAC; NAL
Mortgage Corporation is inactive.

2. Accounting Policies

A summary of the significant accounting policies followed in the
preparation of the accompanying financial statements is presented below:

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
transactions have been eliminated.

Revenue Recognition

Interest income consists of both contractual interest and purchase
discount accretion and is recognized over the contractual term of the
finance contracts using the interest method. Purchase discount represents
the differential, if any, between the amount financed on a loan contract
and the price paid by the Company to acquire the loan contract, net of any
acquisition costs. Any discount on loan contracts which management
considers necessary to absorb future credit losses is allocated to the
reserves available for credit losses. The remaining portion of the
discount, if any, is recognized as interest income as described above.

Revenue from operating leases is recognized as rental revenue on a
straight-line basis over the lease term.

F-7

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Accrual of interest income ceases the earlier of when a contract becomes
delinquent by 90 days or the underlying collateral is repossessed. At
December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had approximately $2,300,000 and
$2,800,000, respectively, in non-accrual finance contracts. Had these
contracts been on full accrual, approximately $195,000 and $236,000 would
have been recognized to earnings for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively.

Servicing fees are reported as income when earned, net of the related
amortization of servicing receivables. Net servicing fees may be reduced
from those that are contractually due if the Company believes that
estimated future cash flows would be insufficient to recover the carrying
value of the servicing receivables. Servicing costs are charged to expense
as incurred.

Late charges and other miscellaneous fees are credited to income as
earned. Fees from the resale of guaranteed asset protection ("GAP")
policies are non-rebatable and recognized as earnings in the current
period.

Finance Receivables and Reserves Available for Credit Losses

The Company purchases contracts from dealers at discounts pursuant to a
financing program that bases the level of discount on, among other things,
the credit risk of the borrower. As discussed above, the portion of the
discount on automobile finance contracts required to absorb future credit
losses, based on management's assessment, is allocated to the reserves
available for credit losses.

As part of the Company's financing program with dealers, agreements are
entered into whereby holdbacks are established to protect the Company from
potential losses. Pursuant to the agreements, when the Company acquires
contracts, it withholds a portion of the proceeds from the dealers to
absorb credit losses. Holdback amounts are refunded to the dealers if the
contract performs throughout its term.

In cases where the purchase discount and/or dealer holdbacks are not
adequate to cover potential losses, the Company establishes an allowance
for losses by charging a provision against earnings.

The combined allowance, discount and dealer holdbacks available for credit
losses are maintained at an amount considered by management to be adequate
to absorb potential credit losses based upon an evaluation of known and
inherent risks in the portfolios. Management's periodic evaluation is
based upon a "static pool analysis" which takes into consideration both
the timing and severity of losses experienced by both the Company and the
industry. Future adjustments to the reserve may be necessary if conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation.

The Company charges off delinquent automobile and consumer receivables
upon the earlier of repossession or 150 days of delinquency. Recovery of
charged off balances begins with the Company's collection specialists. If
results are not obtained within a reasonable time frame, the

F-8

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

account may be turned over to a collection agency or an attorney for
action, including wage garnishment, judgement and asset search.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of funds held in a deposit account pursuant to a
servicing agreement with Fairfax Savings Bank, a participant in certain
loan contracts. The restricted cash represents collections from customers
and is settled monthly with its participant.

Investment in Operating Leases

Operating automobile leases to third parties are originated by dealers and
acquired by the Company, which assumes ownership of the vehicle. Vehicles
held under operating lease agreements are recorded at cost and depreciated
on a straight-line basis over the lease term to the estimated residual
value.

Automobile Inventory

Vehicles acquired through repossession, or termination of a lease, are
valued at the lower of the unpaid principal balance or market value at the
date of repossession.

Debt Issue Costs

Debt issue costs are capitalized and amortized to operations on a straight
line basis over the life of the related debt, which currently approximates
one to three years.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets.

Servicing Receivables

Servicing receivables consist of excess servicing receivables, servicing
fee receivables and cash and cash equivalents in the trusts.

Excess servicing receivables ("ESR") result from the sale of loan
contracts on which the Company retains servicing rights and a portion of
the excess cash flows. ESR's are determined by computing the difference
between the weighted average yield of the contracts sold and the yield to
the purchaser, adjusted for the normal servicing fee based on the
agreements between the Company and the purchaser. The resulting
differential is recorded as a gain in the period of the sale equal to the
present value of the estimated cash flows, and adjusted for anticipated
prepayments, repossessions, liquidations and other losses. The excess
servicing cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the contracts
have been calculated using estimates for

F-9

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

prepayments, losses (charge-offs) and discount rates, which the Company
expects market participants would use for similar instruments.

Servicing fee receivables represent servicing fees earned but not yet paid
to the Company relating to the securitization trusts.

The Company is a party to agreements for the sale of the Company's loan
contracts through asset backed securitization transactions. The terms of
the agreements provide that the Company make cash contributions, as credit
enhancements, equal to a specified percentage of the aggregate principal
balance of the loans sold. The Company deposits the cash to an account
held by a trustee, which in turn invests the cash in high quality liquid
securities. Generally, all collections of interest and principal from loan
contracts are used to pay interest due on the notes and certificates (the
"Securities") and to reduce the principal balance of the Securities.
Collections of interest in excess of that required to pay for (i) the
interest due on the Securities, (ii) ongoing fees and expenses of the
securitization trust, and (iii) the contractual servicing fees (the
"Excess Servicing Cash Flows") are deposited into the reserve account only
to the extent necessary to maintain it at the required maintenance level.
The remaining Excess Servicing Cash Flows, if any, are paid to the
Company. In the event that the collections of interest and principal from
the loan contracts are not sufficient to cover the required distributions
of interest and principal on the Securities, the trustee may withdraw
funds from the reserve account to make up for the shortfall.

Goodwill

Goodwill relating to the acquisition of Special Finance, Inc. was recorded
for approximately $3.8 million. Amortization is computed on a straight
line basis over seven years. (See Note 11.)

Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax
return.

The Company utilizes an asset and liability approach to account for income
taxes on a current and deferred basis using current income tax rates.
Deferred income tax assets are recognized for temporary differences that
will result in deductible amounts in future years. Deferred income tax
liabilities are recognized for temporary differences that will result in
taxable amounts in future years.

F-10

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company considers its primary market area for automotive financing
activities to be the Southeast United States. The properties
collateralizing the other loan receivable portfolios are located primarily
throughout the eastern United States, Texas and California. Although the
Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its
debtors' abilities to honor their obligations to the Company is dependent
upon the economic stability of these areas.

Interest Rate Risk

Contract acquisitions are funded primarily through participations, credit
and warehouse facilities. The participations and credit facilities bear
interest at fixed rates tied to the prime rate at the time of borrowing
and the durations are determined by the durations of the related contracts
since the proceeds of the obligor payments are applied to the repayment of
the participations. The warehouse facility bears interest at a variable
rate tied to LIBOR and the duration is determined by the timing of the
Company's securitization transactions. Contract acquisitions financed by
this facility are warehoused pending securitization. Upon completion of a
securitization, any remaining amounts due associated with the contracts
securitized are repaid along with unpaid interest.

Liquidity

The Company's business requires substantial cash to support the growth of
loan production and operations. In general, the Company finances the
purchase of loans through various credit and warehouse facilities. The
Company funds through these facilities between 80% and 90% of the
principal balance of the loan contract and funds the remainder of the
purchase price through its capital. The Company generates negative cash
flow from operations and expects to continue to do so as long as it
continues to experience significant growth in its loan portfolio. As the
Company continues to increase the volume of loan contracts purchased, it
must secure additional capital to support its growth. The Company's
ability to continue to purchase new contracts is dependent on its
continued sale of contracts in the asset backed securities ("ABS") or
other markets. Failure to secure additional capital or to consummate
securitizations and other sales transactions may result in a significant
adverse effect on the Company's financial position and results of
operations.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings per common share are computed based on the weighted average
number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the
period. The weighted average number of shares of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding used to compute primary and fully diluted
earnings per share was 8,193,394 and 10,587,451, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 1996, and 6,200,362 for the year ended December
31, 1995.

F-11

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant
change in the near term are the adequacy of reserves available for credit
losses, prepayment and estimated losses related to the estimated future
cash flows utilized to calculate servicing receivables, the realization of
estimated residual values on direct finance leases and the realization of
automobile inventory.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1996, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 125 ("SFAS No. 125"), "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 125
provides accounting and reporting standards for transfers and servicing of
financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities based on a financial
components approach that focuses on control. SFAS No. 125 is effective for
transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of
liabilities occurring after December 31, 1996 and is to be prospectively
applied. However, the FASB issued SFAS No. 127, "Deferral of the Effective
Date of Certain Provisions of FASB Statement No. 125 and amendment of FASB
Statement No. 125" which defers, for one year, certain provisions of SFAS
No. 125. This deferral does not include the provisions of SFAS No. 125
which relate to securitizations. Management does not expect the adoption
of SFAS No. 125 to have a significant impact on its financial position and
results of operations of the Company.

In February 1997, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" ("SFAS No. 128") and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 129, "Disclosure of Information about
Capital Structure" ("SFAS No. 129"). SFAS No. 128 establishes standards
for computing and presenting earnings per share. SFAS No. 129 establishes
standards for disclosing information about an entity's capital structure.
These statements are effective for financial statements issued for periods
ending after December 15, 1997. Management does not expect the adoption of
these statements to have a significant impact on the financial position
and results of operations of the Company.

Reclassification

Certain 1995 amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year
presentation.

F-12

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Finance Receivables

Finance receivables at December 31, 1996 and 1995 consists of the
following:

December 31,
1996 1995

Automobile finance contracts:

Held in portfolio:
Direct finance lease payments $ 17,846,305 $ 16,361,733
Estimated residual values 11,992,264 9,170,719
------------- -------------
Total direct finance lease 29,838,569 25,532,452
Less: Unearned interest (8,089,922) (7,069,448)
------------- -------------
Total direct finance leases, net 21,748,647 18,463,004
------------- -------------
Loan contracts 6,843,094 17,080,482
Loan contracts with recourse 3,275,608 29,226,018
------------- -------------
Total loan contracts 10,118,702 46,306,500
------------- -------------
Total held in portfolio 31,867,349 64,769,504
Plus: Deferred costs (unearned fees) 133,897 (123,322)
------------- -------------
Total held in portfolio, net 32,001,246 64,646,182

Held for sale 27,800,892 21,685,000
Advances to dealers 10,984,503 13,459,454
------------- -------------
Total automobile finance contracts 70,786,641 99,790,636

Total consumer finance contracts, net 1,610,486 2,289,503
Total mortgage finance contracts, net 1,230,180 1,805,068
------------- -------------
Finance receivables $ 73,627,307 $ 103,885,207
============= =============

The Company has entered into arrangements with certain of its dealers and
other origination sources by which the Company may require a partial
reimbursement for credit losses sustained on contracts purchased from
these sources.

The Company services automobile finance contracts for others of
approximately $249 million and $48 million as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively.

Automobile finance contracts are collateralized primarily by the related
automobiles and the related security deposits on leases. These contracts
are pledged as security under various debt agreements.

F-13

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Loan contracts held in portfolio are stated at cost as the Company has the
ability and presently intends to hold the portfolio to maturity. Lease
contracts are also stated at cost as the Company has the ability to hold
them to maturity and currently has no plans for disposition prior to
maturity. Contracts held for sale are contracts pending securitization and
are stated at the lower of cost or estimated fair value on an aggregate
basis.

Advances to dealers represent amounts funded by the Company to automobile
dealerships which are collateralized by loan and lease receivables of the
dealers, totalling approximately $14,107,000 and $18,106,000 at December
31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. These advances bear interest at fixed
rates, or at variable rates subject to certain minimum percentages. The
duration of these advances is determined by the duration of the related
collateralized loan and lease receivables.

At December 31, 1996, contractual maturities of finance receivables are as
follows:

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Thereafter Total
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Automobile:
Direct
finance
leases $ 7,040,707 $11,332,947 $ 8,996,996 $ 2,437,755 $ 30,164 $ -- $29,838,569
Loan
contracts 2,873,634 2,865,786 2,439,310 1,459,887 471,943 8,142 10,118,702
Advances to
dealers 3,771,339 4,560,193 2,477,550 171,484 3,937 -- 10,984,503
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
13,685,680 18,758,926 13,913,856 4,069,126 506,044 8,142 50,941,774

Consumer 447,909 301,336 235,768 99,491 93,859 471,272 1,649,635

Mortgage 424,443 163,773 74,164 217,895 66,551 407,229 1,354,055
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
$14,558,032 $19,224,035 $14,223,788 $ 4,386,512 $ 666,454 $ 886,643 $53,945,464
=========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

Included in the total above are fully matured consumer and mortgage loans
totaling $104,314 and $287,884, respectively, at December 31, 1996 which were
purchased by the Company at a substantial discount and are considered
non-performing. The Company has a net investment of approximately $45,000 and
$142,000 in these loans at December 31, 1996, respectively. The mortgage loans
are pledged as security for the participations.

It is the Company's experience that generally a portion of the portfolios are
repaid before the contractual maturity dates. Accordingly, the above tabulation
is not to be regarded as a forecast of the timing of future cash collections.
Additionally, this tabulation assumes liquidation of the residual values upon
expiration of the leases.

F-14

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Reserves Available for Credit Losses

Changes in reserves available for credit losses for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, consisted of the following:

1996 1995

<S> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period $ 2,671,001 $ 305,000

Additions:
Provision charged to income 5,477,291 2,762,273
Purchase discount 11,324,197 3,935,752
Refundable dealer reserve 458,214 527,258
Reserve established from acquisition of SFI 686,000 --

Reductions:
Charge-offs, net of recoveries (10,061,715) (2,648,746)
Release of reserves upon
securitization of automobile contracts (4,628,083) (2,188,280)
Refund of dealer reserve (75,310) (22,256)
------------ -----------
Balance at end of period $ 5,851,595 $ 2,671,001
============ ===========
</TABLE>

The Company allocated approximately $11 million and $4 million in purchase
discount to the reserves available for credit losses during 1996 and 1995,
respectively, which represents management's estimate of the amount
necessary to absorb future credit losses on automobile finance contracts.

On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates the adequacy of the reserves
available for credit losses by analyzing loan and lease contracts using a
"static pool analysis" in which the historical charge-offs are stratified
according to origination date. This analysis takes into consideration
historical loss experience, seasoning of the contracts, and other relevant
factors. Should management deem the level of reserves for credit losses to
be inadequate, an additional provision for credit losses will be recorded
to increase the allowance for credit losses and, therefore, increase the
overall level of the reserves available for credit losses.

F-15

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Investment in Operating Leases

December 31,
1996 1995

<S> <C> <C>
Vehicles held under operating leases, at cost $ 16,021,996 $ 4,449,451
Less: Accumulated depreciation (1,199,635) (394,838)
------------ ------------
$ 14,822,361 $ 4,054,613
============ ============
</TABLE>

At December 31, 1996, future minimum rental revenue on operating leases
are as follows:

1997 $ 2,832,412
1998 2,623,758
1999 2,305,183
2000 1,421,775
------------
$ 9,183,128
============

6. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment at December 31, 1996 and 1995 consists of the
following:

Amount Estimated
1996 1995 useful life
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Furniture, fixtures, and office
equipment $ 3,305,994 $ 2,158,928 5-10 years
Less: Accumulated depreciation (792,589) (356,039)
----------- -----------
$ 2,513,405 $ 1,802,889
=========== ===========
</TABLE>

F-16

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. Servicing Receivables

The Company's servicing receivables at December 31, 1996 and 1995 consist
of the following projected cash flows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

1996 1995

<S> <C> <C>
Contractual principal and interest payments $ 236,583,036 $ 35,163,958
Estimated prepayments 79,193,816 16,878,386
Estimated future reinvestment income 3,694,207 195,079
------------- -------------
Cash inflows 319,471,059 52,237,423
------------- -------------
Scheduled principal and interest payments to investors (265,307,870) (43,591,916)
Reserve for estimated net losses (13,745,796) (2,006,891)
Deferred servicing income (11,949,935) (2,066,678)
Discount to present value (5,956,650) (832,561)
------------- -------------
Cash outflows (296,960,251) (48,498,046)
------------- -------------
Excess servicing receivables, net 22,510,808 3,739,377
Servicing fee receivables 5,041,966 100,288
Cash and cash equivalents 14,045,304 1,704,888
------------- -------------
Servicing receivables, net $ 41,598,078 $ 5,544,553
============= =============
</TABLE>

In analyzing projected cash flows, the Company uses estimates for total
unscheduled principal reductions ranging from 1.25 to 1.50 ABS, cumulative
loan losses up to 7.5% per trust based on industry and Company experience,
servicing fees of 3.0% per annum, and discount rates of up to 12%. Should
future estimated aggregate cash flows be insufficient to cover servicing
receivables, additional amortization will be recorded at that time.

F-17

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8. Debt Participation Interests

Debt participation interests at December 31, 1996 and 1995 consists of
the following:

1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Participation with Fairfax Savings, a Federal
Savings Bank ("Fairfax"), interest at fixed rates
ranging from 10% to 13.5%; principal and
interest due monthly, secured by undivided
interest in automobile finance contracts,
consumer finance contracts, and mortgage
finance contracts. $ 3,139,298 $ 41,845,372
----------- ------------
Participations with investors, secured by
undivided interest in automobile finance
contracts, consumer finance contracts and
mortgage finance contracts; interest at a
fixed rate of 18%. -- 470,432
----------- ------------
Participation with a stockholder, secured by
undivided interest in certain automobile finance
contracts and mortgage finance contracts;
interest at fixed rates of 11.5% to 18%. 5,888 64,718
----------- ------------

$ 3,145,186 $ 42,380,522
=========== ============
</TABLE>

In general, under the terms of the participation agreements, principal
payments on the agreements are tied to the payments received from the
contracts which secure the borrowings. Interest is due monthly. Proceeds
received from contracts financed by Fairfax are first paid to Fairfax to
the extent of any unpaid principal and interest due on participations.
Thereafter, proceeds are allocated to a reserve account until certain
balances are achieved and the remainder is paid to the Company.

Under the Company's participation agreements, collections received from
loans securing the participations are deposited into restricted, trust
bank accounts pending distributions to participation holders.
Distributions generally are disbursed to participants once each month for
the previous month's collections.

The Company services the loan and lease receivables collateralizing the
participation arrangements, including payment collection and posting,
contact with customers, and repossession and disposal of collateral on
defaulted contracts.

F-18
<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scheduled maturities of debt participation interests at December 31, 1996
are as follows:

1997 $ 1,024,342
1998 1,162,890
1999 630,616
2000 96,255
2001 34,986
Thereafter 196,097
-----------

$ 3,145,186
===========

9. Credit and Warehouse Facilities

Credit and warehouse facilities at December 31, 1996 and 1995 consists of
the following:

1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Note payable under a $25 million automobile
loan and lease financing facility, interest due
monthly at 5.5% over LIBOR established and
fixed at time of funding (weighted average rate
of 10.07% at December 31, 1996) with General
Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC"), secured
by certain automobile finance contracts. The
GECC facility automatically renews annually
unless GECC provides the Company with notice
of termination 90 days prior to renewal date $ 24,383,850 $21,844,149

Note payable under a $100 million repurchase
facility with Greenwich Capital secured by
automobile finance contracts. Interest due monthly
at 2.25% over LIBOR (weighted average rate of
7.87% at December 31, 1996) The term of the facility
is for one year, automatically renewable for an
additional year, subject to certain conditions. 22,906,860 11,584,797

Note payable under a $9.5 million revolving
line of credit facility with a third party,
interest due monthly at fixed rates of 13% to 14%,
secured by automobile finance contracts. The
facility is renewable at the lenders'
discretion for an additional one year period provided the
Company meets certain conditions. 4,732,072 --
------------ -----------

$ 52,022,782 $33,428,946
============ ===========
</TABLE>

F-19

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In March 1993, the Company entered into a $20 million three-year revolving
credit facility (the "Congress Facility") with Congress Financial
Corporation, which has been extended until March 1998. The Congress
Facility bears interest at a floating rate of 2% over the prime rate, with
interest payable monthly, and the facility is secured by loan and lease
contracts. As of December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had no borrowings
under the facility.

The repurchase facility is used to warehouse automobile finance contracts
pending securitization. Under the terms of the repurchase facility, the
Company agreed to engage the lender as investment underwriter on these
securitizations until such time that the Company has securitized a
cumulative $250 million in automobile finance contracts. As of December
31, 1996, the Company has securitized approximately $288 million in
automobile finance contracts with this lender.

Under the terms of the repurchase facility with Greenwich Capital, if the
market value of the finance contracts securing the advances declines below
specified levels, Greenwich may require the Company to provide cash or
additional contracts to cover the deficiency.

Scheduled maturities of credit and warehouse facilities at December 31,
1996 are as follows:

Upon securitization $ 22,906,860
1997 7,114,912
1998 6,910,733
1999 7,413,972
2000 7,397,159
2001 279,146
------------

$ 52,022,782
============

Since the repayment of the above debt is directly related to the timing of
the future cash collections of the related finance contracts, the above
schedule of maturities may not be representative of the actual repayments.
The above schedule of maturities excludes the balances held in the
restricted cash accounts.

Scheduled maturities of the repurchase financing facility are structured
to coincide with the securitization of the underlying automobile finance
contracts collateralizing the facility.

The Company must maintain covenants including, among other things,
maintenance of a minimum net worth, debt to equity ratios and maintenance
of certain loan performance criteria. As of December 31, 1996, the Company
was in compliance with relevant financial covenants.

F-20

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. Convertible Subordinated Debt

Convertible subordinated debt at December 31, 1996 and 1995 consists of
the following:

<TABLE>
1996 1995

<S> <C> <C>
Principal outstanding $ 25,000,000 $ 13,065,000
Value assigned to warrants on outstanding debt (126,560) (140,621)
------------ ------------
Convertible subordinated debt, net $ 24,873,440 $ 12,924,379
============ ============
</TABLE>

During 1996 and 1995, the Company completed the offering and sale in
private placement transactions of 9% and 10% Convertible Subordinated Debt
(the "Debentures"), respectively, along with detachable common stock
purchase warrants. The principal amount and accrued interest due under the
Debentures is convertible into shares of common stock at the option of the
holders at conversion prices equal to the lesser of 75% to 85% of the
average closing bid price of the Company's common stock for 10 trading
days prior to conversion and prices ranging from $7.50 to $11.00. In
addition, the Company may redeem the debt together with accrued interest,
at redemption prices ranges from $15 to $25, provided that the stock price
of the Company's common stock trades at the redemption price for twenty
consecutive trading days. During the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995, an aggregate of $5,565,000 and $8,260,000 of Debentures were
converted into 522,380 and 930,519 shares of common stock, respectively.

Scheduled maturities of convertible subordinated debt at December 31, 1996
are as follows:

1997 $ 14,500,000
1998 8,000,000
1999 2,500,000
------------
$ 25,000,000
============

From January 1, 1997 through February 24, 1997, approximately $1 million
of the $14.5 million of subordinated debt scheduled to mature in 1997 was
converted into common stock.

11. Stockholders' Equity

Escrow Share Agreement

On November 30, 1994, the Company merged with an inactive, public shell
company (the "Merger"). Under the terms of the Merger, of the 3,160,000
shares of common stock issued to the Company's stockholders, 400,000
shares issued to certain directors and officers were placed in a Voting
Trust under the terms of a Voting Trust Agreement. The Voting Trust
provides that, on any matter requiring stockholder vote, the trustee will
vote the shares in the same percentage as the other then issued and
outstanding shares of common stock are voted. Such shares may

F-21

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

be released from the Voting Trust pursuant to the following formula. Based
upon the Company's audited financial statements for the years ending
December 31, 1995, 1996, and 1997, 10,000 shares will be released for each
$150,000 of cumulative net income after taxes the Company earns up to
$3,000,000, and 5,000 shares will be released for each $150,000 of
cumulative net income after taxes in excess of $3,000,000, less the number
of shares previously released under this formula. Any shares not released
within three years will be canceled. Based upon the relevant facts and
circumstances, the Company has determined that the release of 340,000 of
the 400,000 shares placed into the Voting Trust will be considered
additional consideration of the Merger and not result in compensation
expense. The remaining 60,000 shares will be considered compensatory in
nature resulting in a charge to earnings for the fair market value at the
date earned. As of December 31, 1996, the Company has exceeded the target
in the escrow share agreement which provides for the release of all of the
remaining escrow shares not previously released in the prior year which
resulted in a non-cash charge for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995 of approximately $301,000 and $280,000, respectively. This non-cash
charge is offset by an increase in common stock. There is no impact on
total stockholders' equity on the Company's financial statements as a
result of the release of the escrow shares and the corresponding charge.

Secondary Stock Offering

In December 1996, the Company completed a secondary public offering of
2,500,000 shares of its common stock resulting in total net proceeds of
approximately $16.9 million. In January 1997, the underwriters of the
secondary offering exercised their overallotment option for 375,000 shares
of the Company's common stock resulting in additional net proceeds of
approximately $2.6 million.

Stock Option Plans

The Company's Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "1994
Plan") covers 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Under the
terms of the 1994 Plan, officers, directors, key employees and consultants
of the Company are eligible to receive incentive as well as non-qualified
stock options and stock appreciation rights ("SARs"). Incentive stock
options granted under the 1994 Plan vest entirely on the third anniversary
from the grant date and are exercisable for a period of up to 10 years
from the date of grant at an exercise price which is not less than the
fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant.
For any stockholder owning more than 10% of the outstanding common stock,
incentive stock options are exercisable for a period of up to five years
from the date of grant at an exercise price which is not less than 110% of
the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the
grant. Non-qualified stock options and stock appreciation rights vest
equally over three years beginning on the first anniversary of date of
grant and are granted on terms determined by the Company's Board of
Directors. Stock appreciation rights give the holder the privilege of
surrendering such rights for the appreciation in the Company's common
stock between the time of grant and surrender.

F-22

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Company's Directors' 1996 Stock Option Plan (the "Directors' Plan")
covers 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock and provides for the
grant of non-qualified stock options and related SARs to the Company's
non-employee directors. Stock options granted under the Directors' Plan
vest entirely on the first anniversary from the grant date and are
exercisable for a period of up to 10 years from the date of grant at an
exercise price which is not less than the fair market value of the
Company's common stock on the date of grant. The Directors' Plan is
administered by the Board of Directors or a committee appointed by the
Board of Directors consisting of at least three of its members.

The following table presents activity for the 1994 Plan and Directors'
Plan for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995:

Number of Weighted Average
Shares Exercise Price
------- --------------
Options Outstanding, December 31, 1994 215,000 $ 6.19

Options granted 328,500 $ 3.96

Options exercised -- --
Options canceled -- --
------- ------
Options Outstanding, December 31, 1995 543,500 $10.88

Options granted 125,000 $9.34
Options exercised -- --
Options canceled (51,334) $12.57
------- ------
Options Outstanding, December 31, 1996 617,166 $10.43
======= ======

Aggregate proceeds realizable upon the exercise of all options outstanding
approximate $6 million at December 31, 1996. Approximately 152,000 stock
options having a weighted average exercise price of $9.40 were exercisable
at December 31, 1996. No options were exercisable at December 31, 1995. As
of December 31, 1996, stock options outstanding under the 1994 Plan and
Directors' Plan have exercise prices ranging from $6.00 to $16.50 and a
weighted average remaining contractual term of 5 years. In addition, the
weighted average fair value of options granted were $6.53 and $4.07 for
the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.

The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee and non-employee director
stock options. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized
for the 1994 Plan or the Directors' Plan as the exercise price equals the
market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant.

F-23

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share had
compensation expense been recorded at the grant date for awards under the
Plan consistent with SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," has been determined as if the Company had accounted for the
employee and non-employee director stock options granted only in the years
ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 under the fair value method of SFAS No.
123. The fair value of each employee stock option grant has been estimated
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995:

1996 1995

Weighted average risk-free interest rate 6.25% 6.48%
Dividend yield 0.00% 0.00%
Volatility .47 .47
Weighted average expected option life 4 years 8 years

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating
the fair market value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require
the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock
price volatility. Because the above stock option plans have
characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect
the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do
not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the
above stock option plans.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized over the options' vesting period. The Company's pro
forma information, as if the Company had adopted the fair value accounting
provisions of SFAS No. 123 for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
is as follows:

1996 1995

Pro forma net income $ 6,980,000 $ 2,723,000
Pro forma fully diluted earnings per share $0.83 $0.44

Acquisition of Special Finance, Inc.

In August 1995, the Company acquired an option to purchase the assets of
Special Finance, Inc. ("SFI"), a Florida based automotive finance broker.
The option would have expired August 1, 2000 and gave the Company the
right to purchase certain assets of SFI for the purchase price of
$1,000,000, plus 125,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock and options
to purchase 65,000 shares of Common Stock at $6.00 per share. An option
price of $250,000 was paid to SFI on August 1, 1995 and was credited
against the purchase price. On June 30, 1996, the Company exercised the
option for the purchase of SFI assets. The acquisition has been accounted
for in 1996 as a purchase business combination and SFI's results of
operations have been included in the Company's statement of operations
since the date of acquisition.

F-24

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following information sets forth the pro forma unaudited results of
operations as if the acquisition with SFI had occurred on January 1, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Years Ended December 31,
1996 1995
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Net interest income after provision for losses $ 10,415,000 $ 7,590,000
Other income 27,985,000 7,252,000
Operating expenses 26,364,000 12,180,000
Net income 7,463,000 1,650,000
Pro forma fully diluted earnings per share $0.90 $0.26
</TABLE>

The unaudited pro forma statements of operations are presented for
comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the
actual results of the Company would have been for the periods presented
had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 1995, nor do they purport to
represent the results of future periods.

Stock Purchase Warrants

The Company has issued detachable stock purchase warrants (the "Warrants")
in connection with the private placement of convertible subordinated debt.
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had 2,913,625 and 1,961,125,
respectively, in Warrants outstanding at exercise prices ranging from
$7.50 to $15. The Warrants contain features that permit redemption at
$.001 per Warrant based on average trading prices ranging from $15 to $25
of the Company's common stock. The exercise prices of 737,500 Warrants are
subject to decrease by virtue of certain price protection and adjustment
features. These features generally provide for decreases in exercise
prices and increases in the number of Warrants exercisable if the Company
sells additional common stock at prices less than the initial exercise
prices of the Warrants.

12. Income Taxes

The components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, consist of the following:

1996 1995
----------- -----------
Current tax expense:
Federal $ 371,850 $ 360,243
State 64,000 72,951
----------- -----------
435,850 433,194
----------- -----------
Deferred tax expense:
Federal 3,581,946 1,349,092
State 613,156 144,035
----------- -----------
4,195,102 1,493,127
----------- -----------
Total provision for income taxes $ 4,630,952 $ 1,926,321
=========== ===========

F-25

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The income tax provision differs from the amount determined by multiplying
pre-tax income by the statutory federal income tax rate. The
reconciliation between the expected tax provision and the actual tax
provision for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 is as follows:

1996 1995

Income taxes at statutory rate $4,164,559 $1,653,185
State taxes 425,380 141,721
Other 41,013 131,415
---------- ----------
Provision for income taxes $4,630,952 $1,926,321
========== ==========

The net deferred income tax liability as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, is
comprised of the following temporary differences:

1996 1995

Deductible Temporary Differences
Amortization of servicing assets $ 1,849,950 $ --
Depreciation 3,151,639 5,850,659
Bad debt reserves 1,114,291 362,441
Discount accretion 752,600 --
Other 43,330 --
------------ -----------
Deferred income tax asset 6,911,810 6,213,100
------------ -----------
Taxable Temporary Differences
Direct financing leases (2,817,772) (6,685,591)
Gain on sale of contracts (7,520,334) (1,131,096)
Unearned interest (1,767,262) --
Other (605,131) --
------------ -----------
Deferred income tax liability (12,710,499) (7,816,687)
------------ -----------
Net deferred income tax liability $ (5,798,689) $(1,603,587)
============ ===========

13. Related Party Transactions

At December 31, 1995, the Company had a stockholder loan payable in the
amount of $2,919,000, interest at 9%, which was repaid during 1996.

14. Employee Benefits

The Company sponsors a 401(k) savings plan covering most employees.
Contributions made by the Company to the 401(k) plan are based on a
specified percentage of employee contributions. Total Company
contributions were approximately $116,000 and $48,000 for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.

F-26

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company leases office space and office equipment under agreements
which expire December 31, 2011. The future minimum non-cancelable
operating lease payments are as follows:

1997 $ 1,295,818
1998 1,355,291
1999 1,405,054
2000 1,448,283
2001 1,187,877
Thereafter 956,654
-----------
Total $ 7,648,977
===========

At December 31, 1996, the Company was committed to lease a computer system
and related software, not yet placed in service, for total payments of
approximately $852,000.

In November 1994, the Company entered into an employment agreement (the
"Agreement") with the president and chief executive officer of the
Company. The Agreement provides for a base salary of $300,000 per year
together with discretionary bonuses, as approved by the Board of
Directors, in addition to certain benefits. The Agreement is renewable
annually for successive three year periods; however, the president may
terminate the Agreement upon written notice the earlier of one year from
the date of such notice or 90 days after his replacement has been hired by
the Company. The president may not terminate the Agreement prior to three
years from the date of the Agreement.

The Company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the
normal course of business. Legal counsel's and management's assessment are
that none of these matters are anticipated to have a material adverse
impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value
of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to
estimate that value. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in
time using estimates of rates of return that the Company believes would be
required by independent third party investors. Accordingly, these
estimates may not be indicative of rates that would be required if actual
sales had taken place.

Finance Receivables

The fair value of finance receivables, other than those held for sale, is
computed by using estimated market rates of return desired by bulk
purchasers. The carrying value of finance receivables held for sale
approximates fair value.

F-27

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash and Restricted Cash

The carrying value approximates fair value.

Investment in Operating Leases

The carrying value approximates fair value.

Servicing Receivables

The carrying value of servicing receivables is determined by calculating
the estimated cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the
contracts using estimates for prepayments, losses and discount rates,
which the Company expects market participants would use for similar
instruments. Accordingly, the carrying amount approximates the fair value.

Periodically, the Company updates its carrying value by recalculating the
estimated remaining cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the
contracts using actual loss and prepayment experience. The estimated
remaining cash flows are then discounted using historical discount rates.
Accordingly, the carrying value at December 31, 1996 and 1995 approximates
the fair value.

Accrued Interest Receivables

The carrying value approximates fair value.

Debt Participation Interests; Credit and Warehouse Facilities; Convertible
Subordinated Debt

The fair value of existing debt is computed based on rates currently
available to the Company for debt with similar terms and maturities.

F-28

<PAGE>

NAL Financial Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Drafts Payable; Other Financial Liabilities

The fair value of other financial liabilities approximates carrying
amount.

The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 are as follows:

1996 1995
----------------------------- ----------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Assets:

Finance receivables,
excluding contracts
held for sale $ 45,826,000 $ 46,014,000 $ 82,200,000 $ 82,674,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total $ 45,826,000 $ 46,014,000 $ 82,200,000 $ 82,674,000
============ ============ ============ ============

Financial Liabilities:

Debt participation
interests $ 3,145,000 $ 3,158,000 $ 42,381,000 $ 42,306,000
Credit and warehouse
facilities 52,023,000 52,237,000 33,429,000 33,017,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total $ 55,168,000 $ 55,395,000 $ 75,810,000 $ 75,323,000
============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>

17. Subsequent Event

On March 26, 1997, the Company completed a securitization of automobile
finance contracts of approximately $82 million.

* * * *

F-29

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No. Description
- ----------- -----------

11 Statement re: computation of per share
earnings

23.1 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP

23.2 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP

27 Financial Data Schedule

NAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

For the years ended
-------------------
1996 1995
------- -------

Primary:

Weighted average shares outstanding 6,985 5,882
Net effect of dilutive stock options
based on the modified treasury stock method 1,208 318
------- -------
Total weighted average shares outstanding 8,193 6,200
======= =======
Net Income $ 7,268 $ 2,797

Income adjustment relating to reduction
of debt based on the modified treasury method 417 --
------- -------
Net income available to common
and common equivalent shares $ 7,685 $ 2,797
======= =======
Per share amount $ 0.94 $ 0.45
======= =======

Fully Diluted:

Weighted average shares outstanding 6,985 5,882
Net effect of dilutive stock options
based on the modified treasury stock method 1,208 322
Net effect of dilutive subordinated
debentures based on the if converted method 2,394 --
------- -------
Total weighted average shares outstanding 10,587 6,204
======= =======

Net Income $ 7,268 $ 2,797

Income adjustment relating to reduction
of debt based on the modified treasury method 417 --
Income adjustment relating to reduction
of debt based on the if converted method 1,364 --
------- -------
Net income available to common
and common equivalent shares $ 9,049 $ 2,797
======= =======
Per share amount $ 0.86 $ 0.45
======= =======

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-05397) of
NAL Financial Group Inc. of our report dated February 24, 1997, except as to
Note 17, which is as of March 26, 1997, appearing on page F-1 of this Form
10-KSB.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 31, 1997

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-22277) of NAL Financial Group Inc. of our report
dated February 24, 1997, except as to Note 17, which is as of March 26, 1997,
appearing on page F-1 of this Form 10-KSB.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 31, 1997

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1.000
<CASH> 8,018
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS> 0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD> 0
<TRADING-ASSETS> 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE> 0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING> 0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET> 0
<LOANS> 73,627
<ALLOWANCE> 5,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 149,785
<DEPOSITS> 0
<SHORT-TERM> 0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER> 93,407
<LONG-TERM> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 1,477
<OTHER-SE> 54,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY> 149,785
<INTEREST-LOAN> 23,142
<INTEREST-INVEST> 0
<INTEREST-OTHER> 0
<INTEREST-TOTAL> 23,142
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 10,954
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET> 12,188
<LOAN-LOSSES> 5,477
<SECURITIES-GAINS> 19,872
<EXPENSE-OTHER> 22,797
<INCOME-PRETAX> 11,899
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 7,268
<EPS-PRIMARY> .94
<EPS-DILUTED> .86
<YIELD-ACTUAL> 9.19
<LOANS-NON> 2,100
<LOANS-PAST> 0
<LOANS-TROUBLED> 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM> 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN> 2,671
<CHARGE-OFFS> 10,062
<RECOVERIES> 7,766
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE> 5,852
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC> 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN> 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED> 0

</TABLE>