SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, (Amendment No. )
Filed by the registrant [x]
Filed by a party other than the registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary proxy statement
[ ] Confidential, for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
[x] Definitive proxy statement
[ ] Definitive additional materials
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
AMCOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
AMCOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
[x] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(i)(2) or
Items 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: N/A
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transactions applies: N/A
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): N/A (4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: N/A
(5) Total fee paid: N/A
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee is
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount previously paid: N/A
(2) Form, schedule or registration statement number: N/A
(3) Filing party: N/A
(4) Date filed: N/A
<PAGE>
AMCOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 7, 1996
To the Stockholders of
AMCOL International Corporation:
Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of stockholders of AMCOL
International Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), will be held
at the Arlington Park Hilton, 3400 West Euclid Avenue, Arlington Heights,
Illinois, 60005, on Tuesday, May 7, 1996, at 11:00 A.M., Central Daylight
Savings Time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect three (3) directors for a three-year term or until their
successors are elected and qualified;
2. To ratify the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as independent
accountants for 1996; and
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
Stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 29, 1996,
will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Shares should be represented as
fully as possible, since a majority is required to constitute a quorum.
Please mark, sign, date and mail the accompanying proxy in the enclosed
self-addressed, postage-paid envelope, whether or not you expect to attend the
meeting in person. You may revoke your proxy at the meeting should you be
present and desire to vote your shares in person, and you may revoke your proxy
for any reason at any time prior to the voting thereof, either by written
revocation prior to the meeting or by appearing at the meeting and voting in
person. Your cooperation is respectfully solicited.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Clarence O. Redman
Secretary
Arlington Heights, Illinois
April 8, 1996
<PAGE>
AMCOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
One North Arlington
1500 West Shure Drive, Suite 500
Arlington Heights, Illinois 60004-7803
(847) 394-8730
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held on May 7, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of
AMCOL International Corporation (the "Company") in connection with the annual
meeting of stockholders to be held on Tuesday, May 7, 1996, at 11:00 A.M.,
Central Daylight Savings Time, and any adjournment thereof ("Annual Meeting"),
at the Arlington Park Hilton, 3400 West Euclid Avenue, Arlington Heights,
Illinois, 60005.
The cost of proxy solicitation will be borne by the Company. In
addition to the solicitation of proxies by the use of the mails, certain
officers and other regular employees of the Company may devote part of their
time (but will not be specifically compensated therefore) to solicitation by
facsimile, telephone or in person. Proxies may be revoked at any time prior to
voting. Revocation may be done prior to the meeting by written revocation sent
to the Secretary of the Company, AMCOL International Corporation, One North
Arlington, 1500 West Shure Drive, Suite 500, Arlington Heights, Illinois,
60004-7803; or it may be done personally upon oral or written request at the
Annual Meeting.
This proxy statement was first mailed or delivered to stockholders on
or about April 8, 1996.
RECORD DATE; VOTING SECURITIES OUTSTANDING
The close of business on March 29, 1996 is the record date for
determining the holders of Common Stock, $.01 par value ("Common Stock"), of the
Company entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
As of March 29, 1996, the Company had outstanding voting securities
consisting of 19,132,941 shares of Common Stock, each of which shares is
entitled to one vote. Each holder of record of outstanding Common Stock at the
close of business on March 29, 1996, will be entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting. Presence in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock will constitute a quorum at the Annual
Meeting. A broker non-vote is not counted in determining voting results. If a
stockholder, present in person or by proxy, abstains on any matter, the
stockholder's shares will not be voted on such matter. Thus, an abstention from
voting on a matter has the same legal effect as a vote "AGAINST" the matter.
<PAGE>
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth, with respect to the Company's Common
Stock, all persons known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
Company's Common Stock as of February 21, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
Shares and
Nature of
Name and Address of Beneficial Percent
Beneficial Owner Ownership(1) of Class
<S> <C> <C>
Harris Trust and Savings Bank..................................... 2,167,834 (2) 11.31%
Paul Bechtner Trust
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60690
Everett P. Weaver................................................. 2,179,834 (3)(4) 11.37%
c/o AMCOL International Corporation
1500 West Shure Drive, Suite 500
Arlington Heights, Illinois 60004-7803
William D. Weaver................................................. 2,906,566 (3)(5) 15.17%
c/o AMCOL International Corporation
1500 West Shure Drive, Suite 500
Arlington Heights, Illinois 60004-7803
<FN>
- -----------------------
(1) Nature of beneficial ownership is direct unless otherwise indicated by
footnote. Beneficial ownership as shown in the table arises from sole
voting and investment power unless otherwise indicated by footnote.
(2) Voting and investment power are shared by the trustees of this trust. See
note (3) below.
(3) Includes 2,167,834 shares held in the Paul Bechtner Trust as to which
Messrs. Everett P. Weaver, William D. Weaver and the Harris Trust and
Savings Bank are co-trustees and share voting and investment power.
(4) Includes 12,000 shares in a trust as to which voting and investment power
are shared with Mr. Weaver's wife.
(5) Includes 521,732 shares held in a living trust as to which Mr. Weaver
exercises sole voting and investment power. Also includes 150,000 shares
held by his wife and 30,000 shares held by his wife as trustee for the
benefit of her brother and 28,000 shares held by his wife for the benefit
of their grandchildren as to which Mr. Weaver may be deemed to share voting
and investment power.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth, as of February 21, 1996, with respect
to the Common Stock, shares beneficially owned by: (i) each director; (ii) the
Chief Executive Officer; (iii) the four other most highly compensated executive
officers; and (iv) as a group, such persons and other executive officers.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
Shares and
Nature of
Beneficial Percent
Beneficial Owner Ownership(1) of Class
<S> <C> <C>
Arthur Brown...................................................... 16,146 (2) *
Robert E. Driscoll, III........................................... 310,200 (3) 1.62%
Raymond A. Foos................................................... 68,413 (4) *
John Hughes....................................................... 508,629 (5) 2.64%
Robert C. Humphrey................................................ 53,704 (6) *
Jay D. Proops..................................................... 2,000 *
C. Eugene Ray..................................................... 94,146 (7) *
Clarence O. Redman................................................ 69,301 (8) *
Paul G. Shelton................................................... 281,832 (9) 1.47%
Dale E. Stahl..................................................... 3,000 *
Paul C. Weaver.................................................... 251,588 (10) 1.31%
Lawrence E. Washow................................................ 296,757 (11) 1.54%
Robert C. Steele.................................................. 16,406 (12) *
Roger P. Palmer .................................................. 35,344 (13) *
All of the above and other executive
officers as a group (15 persons)................................ 1,664,981 (14) 8.50%
<FN>
- --------------------
* Percentage represents less than 1% of the total shares of Common Stock
outstanding as of February 21, 1996.
(1) Nature of beneficial ownership is direct unless otherwise indicated by
footnote. Beneficial ownership as shown in the table arises from sole
voting and investment power unless otherwise indicated by footnote.
(2) Includes 16,146 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days.
(3) Includes 160,200 shares held as co-trustee under a living trust for a
family member.
(4) Includes 16,146 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days.
(5) Includes 13,929 shares held in trusts for his children; 312 shares held as
custodian for his son; 15,218 shares owned by his wife; 819 shares held as
co-trustee under the Company's Savings Plan which are not allocated to
participants' accounts pursuant to the Plan and as to which voting and
investment power are shared; 403 shares are held by the Company's Savings
Plan on his behalf; 175,000 shares held as co-trustee under the Company's
Pension Plan, as to which voting and investment power are shared; and
110,400 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days.
</FN>
<PAGE>
<FN>
(6) Includes 16,500 shares held by Mr. Humphrey's wife; 8,380 shares held by
Mr. Humphrey's son; 26,460 shares held as trustee for family trusts; and
2,364 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days.
(7) Includes 13,500 shares held by Mr. Ray's wife; 3,000 shares held in an
Individual Retirement Account; and 64,146 shares subject to options
exercisable within 60 days.
(8) Includes 9,251 shares held in the Clarence O. Redman, P.C. Savings Plan;
26,450 shares held jointly with his wife; and 33,600 shares subject to
options exercisable within 60 days.
(9) Includes 19,501 shares held jointly with Mr. Shelton's wife; 9,984 shares
held as custodian for his children; 602 shares held by his children;
175,000 shares held as co-trustee under the Company's Pension Plan, as to
which voting and investment power are shared; 59,800 shares subject to
options exercisable within 60 days; 819 shares held as co-trustee under the
Company's Savings Plan which are not allocated to participants' accounts
pursuant to the Plan and as to which voting and investment power are
shared; and 12,626 shares are held by the Company's Savings Plan on his
behalf.
(10) Includes 21,041 shares held by Mr. Weaver's wife, 6,252 shares held by his
wife as custodian for their daughters, 11,360 shares held as co-trustee for
his daughters and 703 shares held by Mr. Weaver as custodian for his
daughter.
(11) Includes 13,736 shares held jointly with Mr. Washow's wife; 1,100 shares
held by his wife; 175,000 shares held as co-trustee under the Company's
Pension Plan, as to which voting and investment power are shared; 86,560
shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days; 819 shares held as
co-trustee under the Company's Savings Plan which are not allocated to
participants' accounts pursuant to the Plan and as to which voting and
investment power are shared; 6,000 shares as custodian for his children;
and 13,542 shares are held by the Company's Savings Plan on his behalf.
(12) Includes 9,536 shares held by the Company's Savings Plan on his behalf; and
6,800 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days.
(13) Includes 2,940 shares held jointly with Mr. Palmer's wife; 2,100 shares
held by his son; 9,860 shares held by the Company's Savings Plan on his
behalf; and 19,620 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days.
(14) Includes 62,627 shares held jointly with a spouse; 224,200 shares held in
various trusts; 16,998 shares held as custodian; 819 shares held as
co-trustee under the Company's Savings Plan which are not allocated to
participants' accounts pursuant to the Plan and as to which voting and
investment power are shared; 46,419 shares vested in officers' and
directors' accounts pursuant to the Company's Savings Plan; 175,000 shares
held as co-trustee under the Company's Pension Plan, as to which voting and
investment power are shared; 84,692 shares held by family members; and
417,982 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
ITEM 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
It is intended that the shares represented by the enclosed proxy will
be voted, unless votes are withheld in accordance with the instructions
contained in the proxy, for the election of the three (3) nominees for Director
named below. In the event that any nominee for Director should become
unavailable, which is not anticipated, the Board of Directors in its discretion
may designate substitute nominees, in which event such shares will be voted for
such substitute nominees. Provided a quorum is present, the affirmative vote by
the holders of a plurality of the shares of the Common Stock represented at the
Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required for the election of each
nominee.
INFORMATION CONCERNING NOMINEES
CLASS I
(Term expiring in 1999)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Director
Name Age Since Principal Occupation for Last Five Years
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Raymond A. Foos................ 67 1981 Retired President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Brush Wellman, Inc.
(manufacturer of beryllium and specialty materials)
since April 1, 1990; prior thereto, President and
Chief Operating Officer
Clarence O. Redman*............ 53 1989 Secretary since 1982. Also, Chief Executive Officer
and a Partner of Keck, Mahin & Cate, the law firm
that serves as Corporate Counsel to the Company
Paul G. Shelton*............... 46 1988 Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of the
Company since 1994; prior thereto, Vice
President-Chief Financial Officer of the Company
</TABLE>
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR EACH OF THE
NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
<PAGE>
INFORMATION CONCERNING MEMBERS OF THE BOARD
CLASS II
(Term expiring in 1997)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Director
Name Age Since Principal Occupation for Last Five Years
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Robert E. Driscoll, III........ 57 1985 Retired Dean and Professor of Law, University of
South Dakota
Robert C. Humphrey*............ 77 1977(1) Retired Chairman of the NBD Bank Evanston N.A.
C. Eugene Ray*................. 63 1981 Chairman of the Board of the Company since 1988;
prior thereto, Executive Vice President- Finance and
director of Signode Industries, Inc., a manufacturer
of industrial strapping products
Dale E. Stahl* ................ 48 1995 President and Chief Operating Officer of Gaylord
Container Corporation since 1988
</TABLE>
CLASS III
(Term expiring in 1998)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Director
Name Age Since Principal Occupation for Last Five Years
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Arthur Brown................... 55 1990 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Hecla Mining Company since 1987
John Hughes*................... 53 1984 President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since 1985
Jay D. Proops* ................ 54 1995 Private investor and former Vice Chairman and
co-founder of The Vigoro Corporation
Paul C. Weaver* ............... 33 1995 Senior Corporate Account Manager for Nielsen Marketing
Research, a provider of marketing information services,
since 1992; prior thereto an Account Executive
<FN>
- --------------------
* Member of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors
(1) Except for a three-month period in 1989.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The Board of Directors held seven meetings during the 1995 fiscal year.
During their term as Director, all Directors attended at least 75% of the
aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the
total number of meetings held by each committee of the Board on which such
Directors served. In addition to the Executive Committee, the Board of Directors
of the Company has standing Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Option
Committees.
The Audit Committee held three meetings during the 1995 fiscal year.
This Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Company's financial
management and its independent auditors, the proposed audit program for each
fiscal year, the results of the audits and the adequacy of the Company's systems
of internal accounting control. The Committee recommends to the Board of
Directors the appointment of the independent auditors for each fiscal year.
Directors Brown, Driscoll, Foos, Ray and Weaver are members of this Committee.
The Compensation Committee held five meetings during the 1995 fiscal
year. This Committee is responsible for annually reviewing the salaries and
bonuses of all executive officers. This Committee also oversees the Company's
compensation, incentive and employee benefit programs. This Committee is
comprised of non-employee directors. Directors Foos, Humphrey, Proops, Ray and
Stahl are members of this Committee.
The Nominating Committee held three meetings during the 1995 fiscal
year. This Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors,
at the request of the Board of Directors, nominees who are deemed by the
Committee to be qualified for Board of Directors' membership. This Committee
does not consider nominees recommended by stockholders. Directors Humphrey and
Ray are members of this Committee.
The Option Committee held two meeting during the 1995 fiscal year. This
Committee is responsible for the selection of those officers, directors and key
employees who are eligible to receive options and determines the number of
options to be awarded and the period during which options may be exercised under
the terms of the Company's various option plans. This Committee is comprised of
persons who do not participate in any option plans. Directors Driscoll and
Redman, and Mr. Everett P. Weaver are members of this Committee.
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT
Summary Compensation Table
The Summary Compensation Table below includes, for each of the fiscal
years ended December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, individual compensation for
services to the Company and its subsidiaries of those persons who were, at
December 31, 1995: (i) the Chief Executive Officer; and (ii) the four other most
highly compensated executive officers of the Company (collectively, the "Named
Officers").
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual Compensation (1)(2) Long Term Compensation Awards
Securties All Other
Bonus Underlying Compensation
Name & Principal Position......... Year Salary ($) ($)(3) Options (#) ($)(4)
- ------------------------- ---- ---------- ------------ ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
John Hughes....................... 1995 345,000 100,000 18,550 6,000
President and 1994 300,000 75,000 21,000 6,000
Chief Executive Officer 1993 240,803 235,000 42,000 15,831
Lawrence E. Washow................ 1995 185,105 29,600 300 6,644
Senior Vice President of 1994 170,000 19,975 1,350 6,325
the Company and President 1993 141,667 91,404 40,950 11,713
of Chemdal International
Corporation
Paul G. Shelton................... 1995 175,000 23,100 7,950 6,000
Senior Vice President and 1994 155,000 18,213 9,000 6,000
Chief Financial Officer of 1993 135,333 88,994 18,000 7,592
the Company and President
of Ameri-Co Carriers, Inc.
and Nationwide Freight
Service, Inc.
Robert C. Steele.................. 1995 165,000 19,800 7,950 6,350
Senior Vice President of 1994 144,754 18,000 6,000 6,000
the Company and President 1993 114,666 73,631 12,000 6,996
of American Colloid Company
Roger P. Palmer................... 1995 140,000 18,480 7,950 6,000
Senior Vice President of 1994 112,500 14,688 6,000 5,824
the Company and President 1993 96,666 66,782 12,000 8,007
of Colloid Environmental
Technologies Company
<FN>
- --------------------
(1) Includes deferred compensation under the Company's Savings Plan and the
Company's Deferred Compensation Plan.
(2) The incremental cost of noncash compensation and other personal benefits
during any year presented did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of
the total of annual salary and bonus reported for any individual named
above.
</FN>
<PAGE>
<FN>
(3) The figures in this column reflect bonuses from the Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan and the Bonus Plan as described in the Board Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation.
(4) The figures in this column include Company matching contributions under the
Company's Savings Plan. Pursuant to the Company's Savings Plan, the named
executive officers received contributions in 1995, 1994 and 1993,
respectively, as follows: Mr. Hughes, $6,000, $6,000, $8,994; Mr. Washow,
$6,000, $6,000, $8,782; Mr. Shelton, $6,000, $6,000, $7,592; Mr. Steele,
$6,000, $6,000, $6,996; and Mr. Palmer, $6,000, $5,824, $5,929. The figures
in this column also include amounts received in connection with the
surrender of certain travel benefits and for years of service awards.
Pursuant to this arrangement, the Named Officers received the following
amounts in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively: Mr. Hughes, $0, $0, and
$6,837; Mr. Washow, $644, $325, and $2,931; Mr. Shelton, $0, $0 and $0; Mr.
Steele, $350, $0 and $0; and Mr. Palmer, $0, $0, and $2,078.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
Shown below is information on grants of incentive stock options during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, to the Named Officers which are
reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on Page 7.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed
Individual Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation
Grants in 1995 for 10-Year Option Term
------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Number of 5% 10%
Securities ------------------ ------------------
Underlying %of Total Present
Options Options Value at Stock Stock
Options Granted To Exercise Expiration Grant Price Dollar Price Dollar
Name Granted(5) Employees(1) Price(2) Date Date(3) (4) Gains (4) Gains
- --------------------- --------- ----------- --------- --------- -------- ------- -------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
John Hughes......... 18,550 13.80% $12.375 2/7/05 $87,742 $20.17 $ 144,505 $32.11 $365,992
Lawrence E. Washow.. 300 .22% $12.375 2/7/05 $ 1,419 $20.17 $ 2,337 $32.11 $ 5,919
Paul G. Shelton..... 7,950 5.91% $12.375 2/7/05 $37,604 $20.17 $ 61,931 $32.11 $156,854
Robert C. Steele.... 7,950 5.91% $12.375 2/7/05 $37,604 $20.17 $ 61,931 $32.11 $156,854
Roger P. Palmer..... 7,950 5.91% $12.375 2/7/05 $37,604 $20.17 $ 61,931 $32.11 $156,854
<FN>
(1) Based on 134,450 options granted to all employees.
(2) Fair market value on the date of grant.
(3) The estimated grant date present value reflected in the above table is
determined using the Black-Scholes model. The material assumptions and
adjustments incorporated in the Black-Scholes model in estimating the value
of the options reflected in the above table include the following: an
exercise price on the option of $12.375, equal to the fair market value of
the underlying stock on the date of grant; an option term of ten years; an
interest rate of 7.47% that represents the interest rate on a U.S. Treasury
security on the date of grant with a maturity date corresponding to that of
the option term; volatility of 48.33% calculated using daily stock prices
for the six-month period prior to the grant date; dividends at the rate of
$0.24 per share representing the annualized dividends paid with respect to
a share of common stock at the date of grant; and reductions of
approximately 12.15% to reflect the probability of forfeiture due to
termination prior to vesting, and approximately 18.92% to reflect the
probability of a shortened option term due to termination of employment
prior to the option expiration date. The ultimate values of the options
will depend on the future market price of the Company's stock, which cannot
be forecast with reasonable accuracy. The actual value, if any, an optionee
will realize upon exercise of an option will depend on the excess of the
market value of the Company's common stock over the exercise price on the
date the option is exercised.
<PAGE>
(4) The share price represents the price of the Common Stock if the assumed
annual rates of stock price appreciation are achieved.
(5) These Incentive Stock Options ("ISO's") were issued pursuant to the
Company's 1993 Stock Plan (the "1993 Plan") and may not be exercised until
they vest. These ISO's vest 40% after two years, 60% after three years, 80%
after four years and 100% after five years, provided that on death or
retirement under specified conditions, these ISO's become fully vested. The
exercise price may not be less than the fair market value of the shares
subject to the option on the date of grant. The exercise price may not be
less than 110% of such fair market value if the purchaser is a holder of
more than 10% percent of the Company's outstanding voting securities.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates
of Stock Price Appreciation for 10-Year Option Term
5% (1) 10%(1)
--------------------------------- -----------------------------
Stock Dollar Stock Dollar
Price Gains Price Gains
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
All Stockholders............................ $20.17 $149,055,504 $32.11 $377,517,983
Named Executive Officers' Gains
as a % of All Stockholders' Gains......... 0.223% 0.223%
<FN>
- --------------------
(1) Total dollar gains based on the assumed annual rates of appreciation shown
here and calculated on 19,134,211 outstanding shares __ the number of
shares outstanding on December 31, 1995. The analysis above illustrates
the gains all stockholders would realize under these same assumed rates of
appreciation and the proportion of executive gains to all stockholders'
gains.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values
Shown below is information with respect to (i) options exercised by the
Named Officers pursuant to the 1983 Plan during fiscal 1995; and (ii)
unexercised options granted in fiscal 1995 and prior years under the 1983 Plan
and the 1993 Plan to the Named Officers and held by them at December 31, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
Securities Value of
Underlying Unexercised
Unexercised In-the-Money
Options at Options at
Shares 12/31/95 12/31/95 ($)
Acquired on Value Exercisable/ Exercisable/
Name Exercise (#) Realized ($) Unexercisable(#) Unexercisable (1)
- ------------------------------- ------------- ------------ ---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
John Hughes.................. 52,766 514,745 90,690/88,150 806,788/354,573
Lawrence E. Washow........... 8,000 88,828 76,420/42,900 790,711/109,560
Paul G. Shelton.............. 4,500 44,811 46,000/36,150 428,432/133,503
Robert C. Steele............. 14,500 154,608 3,200/28,650 8,000/114,904
Roger P. Palmer.............. 0 0 11,520/25,950 83,273/ 84,305
<FN>
- --------------------
(1) Based on the closing sale price as quoted on NASDAQ National Market on that
date.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Retirement Plan Table
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Annual Retirement Benefits for Years of Service Indicated
Remuneration 15 20 25 30 35 40
- ------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$125,000................ $ 28,125 $ 37,500 $ 46,875 $ 56,250 $ 65,625 $ 70,312
$150,000................ 33,750 45,000 56,250 67,500 78,750 84,375
$200,000................ 45,000 60,000 75,000 90,000 105,000 112,500
$250,000................ 56,250 75,000 93,750 112,500 131,250 140,625
$300,000................ 67,500 90,000 112,500 135,000 157,500 168,750
$350,000................ 78,750 105,000 131,250 157,500 183,750 196,875
$400,000................ 90,000 120,000 150,000 180,000 210,000 225,000
$450,000................ 101,250 135,000 168,750 202,500 236,250 253,125
$500,000................ 112,500 150,000 187,500 225,000 262,500 281,250
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Retirement Plans
The above table shows the estimated annual retirement benefits payable
on a straight life annuity basis to participating employees, including officers,
in the earnings and years of service classifications indicated, under the
Company's retirement plans which cover substantially all of its domestic
employees on a non-contributory basis. The estimated benefits as disclosed below
assume (i) that the plans will be continued and (ii) that the employee will
continue employment until normal retirement age. The table below does not
reflect the reduction in an individual's final monthly compensation due to the
social security monthly covered compensation.
This reduction is based upon the retirement year for a particular individual.
Covered compensation includes a participant's base salary, overtime,
commissions, bonuses and salary reductions under the Company's Savings Plan and
Deferred Compensation Plan. The calculations of retirement benefits under the
plans generally is based upon the average earnings for the highest five
consecutive calendar years of compensation preceding the participant's
termination of employment. The number of years of credited service under the
plans as of March 15, 1996, for each of the Named Officers is: Mr. Hughes, 31
years; Mr. Washow, 17 years; Mr. Shelton, 14 years; Mr. Steele, 20 years; and
Mr. Palmer, 14 years. The qualified compensation and estimated annual retirement
benefit as of March 15, 1996, for each of the Named Officers are: Mr. Hughes,
$368,381 and $156,232; Mr. Washow, $196,633 and $41,640; Mr. Shelton, $183,990
and $32,464; Mr.Steele, $161,966 and $38,785; and Mr. Palmer, $137,283 and
$24,787.
Sections 401(a)(17) and 415 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, limit the annual benefits which may be paid from a tax-qualified
retirement plan. As permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, the Company has a supplemental plan which authorizes the payment out of
general funds of the Company, any benefits calculated under provisions of the
Company's pension plan which may be above the limits under these sections. The
accrued, unfunded liability of the supplemental plan at September 30, 1995, was
$251,144.
Director Compensation
The Company has a standard arrangement whereby directors who are not
full-time officers of the Company receive an annual fee of $12,000, plus a
meeting fee of $1,215 per day. In addition, Mr. Ray receives an $14,025 annual
fee for his services as Chairman of the Board. The committee chairman of the
audit, compensation and executive committees receives an additional fee of
$1,600 per year. The committee chairman of the nominating, option and planning
committees receives an additional fee of $1,024 per year. Members of each
committee receive $130 per hour as compensation for service as a committee
member. Directors who are also full-time officers of the Company are not paid
for their services as directors or for attendance at meetings.
Pursuant to the 1987 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, Directors Brown,
Foos, Humphrey, Ray and Weaver were granted 1,000 options each in 1995.
Directors Proops and Stahl were each granted 6,000 options in 1995. All option
grants were at $15.75 per share. Director Driscoll received an additional fee of
$7,635 in lieu of 1,000 options.
<PAGE>
Change In Control Arrangements
Each of Messrs. Hughes, Shelton, Steele, Washow and Palmer (the
"Individual(s)") has an Agreement with the Company which provides that, upon a
change in control of the Company, each of them is to be employed by the Company
for a period of time after the change in control (three years in the case of
Messrs. Hughes and Shelton and two years for Messrs. Steele, Washow and Palmer).
A change in control is defined as a change in legal or beneficial ownership of
51% of the Company's Common Stock within a six-month period, other than by death
or operation of law, or the sale of 90% or more of the Company's assets.
After a change in control, the Company may not terminate the employment
of any of the Individuals except for just cause, and any of the following will
be considered to be a termination for other than just cause: (i) the assignment
of duties of lesser status, dignity and character than the Individual's duties
immediately prior to the date of his Agreement or substantial reduction in the
nature or status of responsibilities; (ii) a reduction in annual base salary or
bonus or incentive plans in effect as of the date of the Agreement or as
increased from time to time; (iii) a relocation to an office more than 35 miles
from the location where the Individual principally works, or substantially
greater travel requirements; and (iv) the failure to provide certain fringe
benefits substantially equal to those enjoyed by the Individual as of the date
of the Agreement. In addition, any termination of employment following
discussions by a stockholder or group of stockholders beneficially owning more
than 20% of the Company's Common Stock or a designated representative of the
Board of Directors with a third party that results in a change in control of the
Company within 180 days shall be deemed to be a termination of employment after
a change in control for purposes of the Agreements (unless the termination is
for cause or wholly unrelated to such discussions).
If termination of employment occurs within a specified period after a
change in control for just cause (three years in the case of Messrs. Hughes and
Shelton and two years in the case of Messrs. Steele, Washow and Palmer), the
Individual will receive all accrued sums and benefits required by contract or by
law. If termination occurs within such period for other than just cause, through
either actual termination or constructive termination as described above, they
will receive, in addition, base period compensation (defined as current annual
salary plus the average of the last two years in the case of Messrs. Steele,
Washow and Palmer and three years in the case of Messrs. Hughes and Shelton of
incentive bonus payments) less any compensation received from the date of change
in control to the termination date, provided that the amounts payable under the
Agreement may not exceed an amount equal to two times in the case of Messrs.
Steele, Washow and Palmer and three times in the case of Messrs. Hughes and
Shelton the Individual's average annual compensation payable by the Company
during the five calendar years prior to the date of change in control. They will
also receive continued medical, health and disability benefits for one year
after termination.
The Agreements do not require any of the Individuals to seek other
employment, but the amounts of payments or benefits thereunder are to be reduced
by up to 50% by any compensation earned from other employment. For a period of
years (three years in the case of Messrs. Hughes and Shelton and two years in
the case of Messrs. Steele, Washow and Palmer) from the date of termination of
employment with or without cause, before or after a change in control, each of
the Individuals is prohibited from owning, managing, operating, controlling or
otherwise engaging in any business that competes with any business conducted by
the Company and from inducing or attempting to influence any employee of the
Company to leave its employ.
The Agreements are dated, and their terms commence, as follows: Messrs.
Hughes and Shelton, April 1, 1994; Messrs. Steele, Palmer, and Washow, February
7, 1996.
<PAGE>
BOARD COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Company's mission is to supply high-quality performance products
and innovative technologies for minerals, absorbent polymers and environmental
markets worldwide. To accomplish this objective, the Company has developed
comprehensive business and reward strategies that emphasize maximizing
stockholder value and growth in sales and earnings. The compensation program has
been designed to reinforce and support the Company's business goals and to help
the organization both attract and retain the highest quality executive talent.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is comprised of
five non-employee directors whose objectives are to approve the design, assess
the effectiveness, and administer compensation programs in support of
compensation policies. The Compensation Committee also evaluates executive
performance and reviews and approves all salary arrangements and other
remuneration for the officer group.
The Option Committee of the Board of Directors is comprised of two
non-employee directors whose objectives are to select those officers, directors
and key employees who are eligible to receive options and the number of options
to be awarded and the period during which the options may be exercised. The
members of this Committee do not participate in any option plans.
The Compensation Committee is committed to implementing and
administering a compensation program that supports and underscores the Company's
mission and values. The policies underlying the Compensation Committee's
compensation decisions are enumerated more fully below:
Compensation opportunities should strengthen the Company's ability to
attract, retain, and encourage the growth and development of the
highest caliber executive talent upon whose efforts the success of the
Company largely depends.
A substantial portion of pay for senior executives should be comprised
of at-risk, variable compensation whose payout is dependent on the
achievement of specific corporate and individual performance
objectives. In addition, the at-risk components of pay will have a
significant equity-based element to ensure appropriate linkage between
executive behavior and stockholder interests.
Each compensation component targets pay opportunities at the median of
compensation paid to executives included in the Company's compensation
peer group. The Company's comparative compensation group is not the
same as the corporations which make up the peer group in the stock
price performance graph included in this proxy statement. In order to
provide an appropriate basis for compensation analysis, a group larger
than the stock price graph's peer group was used. Note, however, that a
significant number of the peer group companies are included in the
comparative compensation group.
Components of Compensation
The Company's total compensation program consists of several
components, each of which plays a role in supporting overall business goals and
pay philosophy. In assessing the competitiveness of the Company's senior
executive compensation programs, available salary data consisting of general
manufacturing companies is used for comparison purposes. Pay decisions are based
upon pay data for comparable positions. The total compensation program consists
of base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives.
<PAGE>
Base Pay
Base salaries are set at median levels (50th percentile) relative to
competitive market data levels for comparable positions based upon available
survey data from general manufacturing and durable and nondurable goods
manufacturing industries. The Compensation Committee annually reviews each
executive's base salary and makes adjustments based upon varying levels of
responsibility, breadth of knowledge, internal equity issues, as well as market
pay practices. Salary adjustments are based primarily upon individual
performance which is evaluated based on individual contributions to the Company.
As reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on Page 7, the Chief
Executive Officer's base salary was increased in 1995 by $45,000 (15%). In
arriving at Mr. Hughes' base salary, the Compensation Committee considered his
individual performance and his long-term contributions to the financial success
of the Company. The Committee also compared Mr. Hughes' base salary to the base
salaries of chief executive officers from appropriate salary surveys.
Annual Incentives
The Executive Incentive Compensation Plan ("Incentive Plan")
underscores the Company's pay-for-performance philosophy by rewarding executives
for meaningful contributions toward predetermined financial performance goals.
The annual incentive opportunity provides a mechanism that allows the Company to
communicate specific goals that are paramount during the ensuing year and
motivates executives toward achievement of those goals. The aggregate amount to
be distributed is determined pursuant to a profit-related formula tied to return
on stockholders' equity for the year. However, no payouts are made until the
Company first achieves a designated level of Company profitability.
In keeping with the Company's pay-for-performance philosophy, incentive
payouts may be further increased or decreased based upon varying levels of
profitability. Corporate performance in 1995 exceeded the designated profit
level, and bonuses were paid accordingly.
In 1995, the Chief Executive Officer's annual bonus payment represented
29% of his base salary, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page
7. Under the Incentive Plan, Mr. Hughes was paid $100,000 in connection with
1995 performance, representing an 89% level of achievement of the predetermined
financial goals.
Long-Term Incentives
Long-term incentives are provided annually in the form of incentive
stock options (ISO's). Options under the Company's 1993 Stock Plan are granted
by the Option Committee. ISO's are granted at a price not less than the fair
market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Hence, the options only
will have value when and if the stock price appreciates above the grant date
price. ISO's are the only long-term incentive compensation vehicle currently
used by the Company.
The option program serves to focus executives on long-term stockholder
value creation and foster an ownership mentality among the executive management
team. In keeping with the Company's commitment to provide a total compensation
package that focuses on at-risk pay components, long-term incentives will
continue to comprise a large portion of the value of an executive's total
compensation package. Currently, approximately 16 percent of the value of total
compensation is comprised of equity incentives.
<PAGE>
When determining award sizes, the Option Committee considers the
executive's responsibility level, prior experience, historical award data, and
ability to impact long-term stockholder value creation. The Option Committee
also strives to deliver market competitive long-term incentive award
opportunities to executives based on the dollar value of the award delivered.
Consequently, the number of shares underlying the option awards varies and is
dependent upon the grant date stock price.
In 1995, the Chief Executive Officer received options to purchase
18,550 shares with an exercise price of $12.375, as provided in the Option Grant
Table on page 8. The Option Committee believes the equity incentive program
provides a strong linkage between management behavior and stockholder interests.
Policy with Respect to the $1 Million Deduction Limit
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits the corporate
deduction for compensation paid to executive officers named in the proxy to $1
million unless certain requirements are met. The Compensation Committee has
carefully considered the impact of Section 162(m), and because of the current
executive compensation levels, has determined that the provision would have no
effect on compensation paid to executive officers. Therefore, no modifications
to executive compensation programs are warranted at this time.
Compensation Committee Option Committee
---------------------- ----------------
Robert C. Humphrey, Chairman Robert E. Driscoll, III, Chairman
Raymond A. Foos Clarence O. Redman
Jay D. Proops
C. Eugene Ray
Dale E. Stahl
Performance Graph
The following graph sets forth a five year comparison of cumulative
total returns for: (i) the Company (which is traded on NASDAQ); (ii) S&P
SmallCap 600 Index; and (iii) a custom peer group of publicly traded companies
(the "Peer Group").
In identifying the Peer Group, the Company reviewed a list of public
companies designated under the Standard Industrial Classification Code (the "SIC
Code") for "Mining, Quarry, and Nonmetal Materials" and "Plastics, Materials and
Resins." Upon a review of these designated companies, the Company selected the
Peer Group which consists of companies whose businesses, sales sizes and market
capitalization were similar to that of the Company.
All returns were calculated assuming dividend reinvestment on a
quarterly basis. The returns of each company in the Peer Group have been
weighted according to market capitalization.
The Peer Group consists of the following companies: CalMat Co., The
Dexter Corporation, Dow Corning Corporation, Dravo Corporation, Electrochemical
Industries, Hercules Incorporated, Nalco Chemical Company, Oil-Dri Corporation
of America1, Ozite Corporation, Penn Virginia Corporation, Potash Import and
Chemical Corporation, Quantum Chemical Corporation, Rexene Corporation, Rohm and
Haas Co., A. Schulman Inc., Urethane Technologies Inc., Vista Chemical Co.,
Vulcan Materials Company and Zemex Corporation.
--------------------
(1) Oil-Dri Corporation of America is not designated under the SIC Codes
referenced above but is comparable to the Company and, therefore, is
included in the Peer Group
<PAGE>
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return*
AMCOL International Corporation, S&P SmallCap 600 and Peer Group
EDGAR REPRESENTATION OF DATA POINTS USED IN PRINTED GRAPHIC
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Dec-91 Dec-92 Dec-93 Dec-94 Dec-95
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AMCOL International 143.8 319.1 810.8 509.2 523.0
S&P SmallCap 600 148.4 179.7 213.5 203.3 264.1
Peer Group 135.0 158.5 208.0 223.3 302.9
</TABLE>
Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1990, in
AMCOL International Corporation Common Stock, S&P SmallCap 600
and Peer Group.
* Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Mr. Redman is a member of the Company's Option Committee and as such
determined the terms of the options awarded to each of the Named Officers. Mr.
Redman is a partner of Keck, Mahin & Cate, the principal law firm engaged by the
Company.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
Under the securities laws of the United States, the Company's
directors, its executive officers, and any persons holding more than ten percent
of the Company's Common Stock are required to report their initial ownership of
the Company's Common Stock and any subsequent changes in that ownership to the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Specific due dates for these reports have
been established and the Company is required to disclose in this proxy statement
that Form 3's for the following directors of the Company were filed late: Mr.
Jay D. Proops, Mr. Dale E. Stahl, and Mr. Paul C. Weaver. Additionally, Mr.
Robert C. Steele, an executive officer of the Company, filed one late report
covering 24 shares of Common Stock, Mr. Raymond A. Foos, a director of the
Company, filed one late report covering 1,000 shares of Common Stock, Mr. C.
Eugene Ray, a director of the Company, filed one late report covering 1,000
shares of Common Stock, Mr. Robert C. Humphrey, a director of the Company, filed
one late report covering 1,000 shares of Common Stock and Mr. Arthur Brown, a
director of the Company, filed one late report covering 1,000 shares of Common
Stock. In making these disclosures, the Company has relied solely on written
representations of its directors and executive officers and copies of the
reports that they have filed with the Commission.
<PAGE>
ITEM 2
PROPOSED RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Upon the recommendation of its Audit Committee, the Board of Directors
retained KPMG Peat Marwick LLP to examine the financial statements of the
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 and appointed KPMG Peat
Marwick LLP as independent accountants for the Company to audit its consolidated
financial statements for 1996 and to perform audit-related services. Such
services include review of the Company's quarterly interim financial
information; review of periodic reports and registration statements filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission; issuance of special-purpose
reports covering such matters as employee benefit plans, management incentive
compensation and submissions to various governmental agencies; and consultation
in connection with various accounting and financial reporting matters, as well
as computer software matters.
The Board has directed that the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP be
submitted to the stockholders for approval. If the stockholders should not
approve, the Audit Committee and the Board will reconsider the appointment.
The Company has been advised by KPMG Peat Marwick LLP that it expects
to have a representative present at the Annual Meeting and that such
representative will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Such
representative will also have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she
desires to do so.
Proxies will be voted for or against approval of this proposed
ratification in accordance with the specifications marked thereon, and will be
voted in favor of approval if no specification is made. Approval requires the
favorable vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock
represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, assuming that a quorum
is present.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP AS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS.
OTHER MATTERS
Stockholder Proposals
Stockholder proposals intended to be included in the Company's proxy
statement and form of proxy relating to, and to be presented at, the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held in 1997 must be received by
the Company on or before December 9, 1996.
Pursuant to a recent amendment to the Company's by-laws, stockholder
proposals for business, including director nominations, to be conducted at any
annual meeting of stockholders (but which will not be included in the Company's
proxy materials) must comply with the notice procedures set forth in the
by-laws. Generally, such proposals must be delivered to the Company not later
than the 60th day nor earlier than the 90th day prior to the first anniversary
of the preceding year's annual meeting. For example, stockholder proposals for
business to be presented at the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held in 1997 must be received by the Company between February 6, 1997 and March
8, 1997. The Company will be pleased to make its by-laws available to
stockholders without charge, upon written request to the Corporate Secretary.
<PAGE>
Voting Proxies
The enclosed proxy card confers authority to vote, in accordance with
the instructions contained in the proxy, with respect to the election of the
nominees for director specified in this Proxy Statement and the ratification of
the independent accountants, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP. The proxy will be voted in
accordance with the choices indicated thereon. If no specifications are made,
proxies will be voted "FOR ALL NOMINEES" for director, and "FOR" the
ratification of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as independent accountants.
Other Business
The Board of Directors knows of no other business that will be
represented at the meeting. Should any other business come before the meeting,
it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy form to vote in
accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Clarence O. Redman
Secretary
Arlington Heights, Illinois
April 8, 1996
<PAGE>
AMCOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 7, 1996
The undersigned stockholder of AMCOL International Corporation does
hereby acknowledge receipt of Notice of said Annual Meeting and accompanying
Proxy Statement and constitutes and appoints John Hughes, Paul G. Shelton and
Paul C. Weaver, or any one of them, with full power of substitution, to vote all
shares of stock of AMCOL International Corporation which the undersigned is
entitled to vote, as fully as the undersigned could do if personally present, at
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of said Corporation to be held on Tuesday,
May 7, 1996, at 11:00 A.M., Central Daylight Savings Time, and at any
adjournments thereof, at the Arlington Park Hilton, 3400 West Euclid Avenue,
Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005.
<PAGE>
1. The election of Raymond A. Foos, Clarence O. Redman and Paul G. Shelton as
Class I Directors:
[ ] FOR ALL NOMINEES EXCEPT NOMINEE(S) WRITTEN IN THE SPACE BELOW:
--------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ALL NOMINEES
2. The proposal to ratify KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as independent accountants for
1996:
[ ]FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
3. As such proxies may in their discretion determine upon such other matters
as may properly come before the meeting.
THIS PROXY SHALL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN AND IN THE
ABSENCE OF SUCH INSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE VOTED FOR ALL OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES
DESCRIBED IN ITEM (1) AND FOR ITEM (2). IF OTHER BUSINESS IS PRESENTED AT SAID
MEETING, THIS PROXY SHALL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BEST JUDGMENT OF THE
PROXIES ON THOSE MATTERS.
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
You are urged to mark, sign and return your proxy without delay in the
return envelope provided for that purpose, which requires no postage if mailed
in the United States.
Dated , 1996
---------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE OF STOCKHOLDER
---------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE OF STOCKHOLDER
When signing the proxy, please date it and take care
to have the signature conform to the stockholder's
name as it appears on this side of the proxy. If
shares are registered in the names of two or more
persons, each person should sign. Executors,
administrators, trustees and guardians should so
indicate when signing.
