<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
- ---------- Registration No. 333-56247
374,804 SHARES
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
COMMON STOCK
This Prospectus relates to 374,804 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01
per share (the "Common Stock"), of Eastern Environmental Services, Inc. (the
"Company") currently outstanding (the "Shares"). The Shares are being offered
for sale pursuant to this Prospectus (the "Offering"), from time to time, by or
for the account of the stockholders named herein (the "Registered
Stockholders"). See "Registered Stockholders." The Company will not receive
any of the proceeds of the Offering.
All of the Shares were issued by the Company in connection with
acquisitions of solid waste management businesses since March 1998, and all of
the Shares are included in this Prospectus pursuant to the exercise of
registration rights granted the holders thereof in connection with such
acquisitions.
The Registered Stockholders, either directly, through agents designated or
to be designated from time to time by them, or through underwriters or dealers,
may sell the Shares from time to time on terms to be determined by the
Registered Stockholders at the time of sale. The Registered Stockholders may
also seek, to the extent permitted by applicable laws, to sell the Shares in
transactions under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act").
All expenses of the Offering, other than commissions or discounts of
broker-dealers, will be borne by the Company. It is estimated that such
expenses to be borne by the Company will approximate $15,000.
The Registered Stockholders and any broker-dealers, agents, underwriters or
dealers that participate with the Registered Stockholders in the distribution of
the Shares may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning of the
Securities Act, and any commissions received by them and any profit on the
resale of the Shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting
commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.
The Common Stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol "EESI." The closing sale price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq
National Market on June 22, 1998 was $31 1/4 per share.
__________________
THESE SECURITIES INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON
PAGE 5 OF THIS PROSPECTUS FOR INFORMATION THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY
PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS.
__________________
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS
A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
__________________
The date of this Prospectus is June 22, 1998
<PAGE>
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and in accordance
therewith files reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Such reports, proxy
statements and other information may be inspected and copied at the public
reference facilities maintained by the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the Commission's Regional Offices at Seven World
Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New York 10048 and Citicorp Center, 500 West
Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661. Copies of such material
also can be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the Commission, at 450
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. The Commission
maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and
information statements and other information regarding registrants, like the
Company, that file electronically with the Commission. The Company's Common
Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market, and reports, proxy statements and
other information concerning the Company may be inspected at the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. at 1735 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20006-1500.
The Company has filed with the Commission a Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (together with any amendments thereto, the "Registration Statement") under
the Securities Act with respect to the securities offered hereby. As permitted
by the rules and regulations of the Commission, this Prospectus does not contain
all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement and exhibits
thereto. Statements contained in this Prospectus or in any document
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus as to the contents of any contract
or other document referred to herein or therein are not necessarily complete,
and in each instance where such contract or document has been filed as an
exhibit to the Registration Statement, or other document incorporated by
reference, reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document,
each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents have been previously filed by the Company with the
Commission and are hereby incorporated by reference in this Prospectus as of
their respective dates:
(i) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1997 (as amended on Form 10-K/A filed October 28, 1997),
excluding the financial statements and notes thereto, selected
consolidated financial data, and the information contained under
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations which have been superseded by the financial
statements and notes thereto, the selected consolidated financial
data, and the information contained under Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 20, 1998.
(ii) The Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended
September 30, 1997 (filed November 13, 1997), December 31, 1997 (filed
February 17, 1998) and March 31, 1998 (filed May 15, 1998); the
financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 1997 and
December 31, 1997 are deemed to be outdated as they are not on a basis
consistent with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May
20, 1998 as they do not reflect:
(a) pooling of interests accounting for an acquisition that occurred
subsequent to December 31, 1997; and
(b) as it relates to the quarter ended September 30, 1997, earnings
per share information calculated in accordance with the recently
issued pronouncement FASB 128, Earnings Per Share.
------------------
2
<PAGE>
(iii) The following Current Reports on Form 8-K of the Company:
(a) five Forms 8-K/A filed on July 10, 1997, for the purpose
of: (1) amending the Company's Form 8-K/A dated July 2,
1996; (2) amending the Company's Form 8-K dated September
27, 1996; (3) amending the Company's Form 8-K dated
December 10, 1996; (4) amending the Company's Form 8-K
dated January 31, 1997; and (5) amending the Company's
Form 8-K dated March 31, 1997;
(b) Form 8-K dated May 12, 1997 (as amended on Form 8-K/A
filed July 11, 1997 and as amended on Form 8-K/A filed
July 25, 1997);
(c) Form 8-K dated August 15, 1997 (as amended on Form 8-K/A
filed October 10, 1997);
(d) Form 8-K dated August 20, 1997 (as amended on Form 8-K/A
filed November 3, 1997);
(e) Form 8-K dated October 17, 1997;
(f) Form 8-K dated October 27, 1997;
(g) Form 8-K dated December 1, 1997 (as amended on Form 8-K/A
filed February 17, 1998);
(h) Form 8-K dated December 1, 1997 (as amended on Form 8-K/A
filed February 13, 1998);
(i) Form 8-K dated February 12, 1998 (as amended on Form 8-K/A
filed April 27, 1998);
(j) Form 8-K dated February 27, 1998;
(k) Form 8-K dated March 9, 1998 (as amended on Form 8-K/A
filed April 8, 1998);
(l) Form 8-K dated March 31, 1998 (as amended on Form 8-K/A
filed April 24, 1998);
(m) Form 8-K dated March 31, 1998;
(n) Form 8-K dated April 1, 1998;
(o) Form 8-K dated April 20, 1998 (as amended on Form 8/K
filed May 20, 1998);
(p) Form 8-K dated April 24, 1998;
(q) Form 8-K dated May 1, 1998;
(r) Form 8-K dated May 20, 1998; and
(s) Form 8-K dated May 27, 1998.
(iv) The description of the Common Stock contained in the
Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 0-16102),
including all amendments and reports filed for the purpose of
updating such description prior to the termination of the
Offering.
3
<PAGE>
Additionally, all documents and reports filed by the Company with the
Commission pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
subsequent to the date of this Prospectus and prior to termination of the
Offering shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and
to be a part hereof from the date of filing of such documents or reports. Any
statement or information contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be
incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded
for purposes of this Prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein
or in any subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed to be
incorporated by reference herein modifies or supersedes such statement. Any
statement or information so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except
as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this Prospectus.
The Company will provide without charge to each person to whom a copy of
this Prospectus is delivered, upon written or oral request, a copy of any or all
of the documents that have been incorporated by reference in this Prospectus,
other than exhibits to such documents, unless such exhibits are specifically
incorporated by reference into the documents that this Prospectus incorporates.
Requests for such copies should be submitted in writing to Eastern Environmental
Services, Inc., 1000 Crawford Place, Suite 400, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054,
Attention: Investor Relations, or by telephone to (609) 235-6009.
4
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the shares of Common Stock being offered by this
Prospectus involves a high degree of risk. In addition, this Prospectus and the
Company's reports under the Exchange Act incorporated herein by reference (the
"Incorporated Documents") contain forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may
be found under "Risk Factors," as well as in this Prospectus and the
Incorporated Documents generally. The Company's actual results could differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of certain factors, including those set forth in the following Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Prospectus and the Incorporated Documents.
Accordingly, prospective investors should consider carefully the following Risk
Factors, in addition to the other information concerning the Company and its
business contained in this Prospectus and in the Incorporated Documents, before
purchasing shares of Common Stock offered hereby.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLETING PENDING ACQUISITIONS
The Company has entered into definitive agreements to acquire additional
waste management businesses, the completion of which are subject to customary
closing conditions, including due diligence and the requirements of obtaining
certain governmental and other third party consents. No assurances can be given
that the closing conditions will be satisfied or that the parties will be able
to obtain such governmental and other third party consents. Accordingly, there
can be no assurance that any of these pending acquisitions will occur.
HISTORY OF LOSSES; WORKING CAPITAL DEFICITS; CONTINUING CHARGES
The Company has reported net losses in prior fiscal years, including a net
loss to common stockholders of approximately $2.8 million (including $3.0
million in unusual items principally related to the Company's June 1996 change
of control) during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996. Additionally, the
Company has reported working capital deficits, including $0.5 million and $1.6
million at June 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively. In connection with the
financing of its acquisitions and business growth, the Company has incurred, and
anticipates that it will continue to incur, significant debt and interest
charges under its revolving credit facility. In addition, the Company will
continue to recognize a significant amount of goodwill amortization charges in
connection with its acquisitions of collection and transportation businesses and
transfer stations that are accounted for under the "purchase" method of
accounting. Such goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 40 years
depending on the business acquired, resulting in an annual non-cash charge to
earnings during that period. As the Company continues to pursue its acquisition
program, its financial position and results of operations may fluctuate
significantly from period to period.
LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY IN REGARD TO SIGNIFICANT ASSETS
The Company's acquisition of solid waste collection, transportation and
disposal businesses from July 1, 1996 through March 31, 1998 contributed
approximately $139 million or 95% of the Company's revenues for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1997 and approximately $158 million or 86% of the Company's
assets at June 30, 1997. Because of the Company's relatively limited operating
history with respect to these recently acquired businesses, no assurances can be
given that the Company will be able to replicate or improve upon their
historical financial performance.
ABILITY TO MANAGE GROWTH
The Company's strategy of growing primarily through acquisitions has
placed, and is expected to continue to place, significant burdens on the
Company's management and on its operational and other resources. The Company
will need to attract, train, motivate, retain and supervise its senior managers,
technical professionals and other employees. Any failure to expand its
management information system capabilities, to implement and improve its
operational and financial systems and controls or to recruit appropriate
additional personnel in an efficient manner and at a pace consistent with the
Company's business growth, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business and results of operations.
5
<PAGE>
DEPENDENCE ON ACQUISITIONS FOR GROWTH
The rate of future growth and profitability of the Company is largely
dependent on its ability to identify and acquire additional solid waste
collection, transportation, and disposal businesses. This strategy involves
risks inherent in assessing the values, strengths, weaknesses, risks and
profitability of acquisition candidates, including adverse short-term effects on
the Company's reported operating results, diversion of management's attention,
dependence on retaining, hiring and training key personnel, and risks associated
with unanticipated problems or latent liabilities. There can be no assurance
that acquisition opportunities will be available, that the Company will have
access to the capital required to finance potential acquisitions, that the
Company will continue to acquire businesses, or that any business acquired by
the Company will be integrated successfully into the Company's operations or
prove profitable.
AVAILABILITY OF ACQUISITION TARGETS
Increased competition for acquisition candidates may result in fewer
acquisition opportunities being made available to the Company as well as less
advantageous acquisition terms which may increase acquisition costs to levels
that are beyond the Company's financial capability or that may have an adverse
effect on the Company's business and results of operations. Accordingly, no
assurance can be given as to the number or timing of the Company's acquisitions
or as to the availability of financing necessary to complete an acquisition.
The Company also believes that a significant factor in its ability to consummate
acquisitions following the Offering will be the attractiveness of the Common
Stock as an investment to potential acquisition candidates. Such attractiveness
may, in large part, be dependent upon the market price and capital appreciation
prospects of the Common Stock compared to the equity securities of the Company's
competitors. Many of the Company's competitors for acquisitions are larger,
more established companies with significantly greater capital resources than the
Company and whose equity securities may be more attractive than the Common
Stock. To the extent the Common Stock is less attractive to acquisition
candidates, the Company's acquisition program may be adversely affected.
ABILITY TO INTEGRATE ACQUIRED BUSINESSES AND ACHIEVE OPERATING EFFICIENCIES
The Company is in the process of combining the businesses and assets that
it has recently acquired into an integrated operating structure. This process
may require, among other things, changes in the operation methods and strategies
of these separate businesses. The future growth and profitability of the
Company will be substantially dependent upon its ability to operate recently
acquired companies as well as additional businesses that may be acquired in the
future, and integrate them in the Company's operations. The Company's strategy
is to achieve economies of scale and operating efficiencies through increases in
its size resulting from acquisitions. There can be no assurance that the
Company's efforts to integrate acquired operations will be effective or that
expected efficiencies and economies of scale will be realized. The failure to
achieve any of these results could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business and results of operations.
POTENTIAL LIABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUISITIONS
The businesses acquired by the Company may have liabilities that the
Company does not discover or may be unable to discover during its preacquisition
investigations, including liabilities arising from environmental contamination
or noncompliance by prior owners with environmental laws or regulatory
requirements, and for which the Company, as a successor owner or operator, may
be responsible. Certain environmental liabilities, even if not expressly
assumed by the Company, may nonetheless be imposed on the Company under certain
legal theories of successor liability, including the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended. The businesses
acquired by the Company handled and stored petroleum, motor oil, and other
hazardous substances at their facilities. In the past, there may have been
releases of these hazardous substances into the soil or groundwater. The
Company may be required under federal, state, or local law to investigate and
remediate this contamination, if any. Any indemnities or warranties, due to
their limited scope, amount, duration, the financial limitations of the
indemnitor or warrantor, or other reasons, may not fully cover such liabilities.
NEED FOR ADDITIONAL CAPITAL; POTENTIAL DILUTION
The Company's acquisition program required a steady increase in capital,
which is expected to continue in the future as the Company pursues its strategy.
The Company has used with respect to completed acquisitions and intends to use
with respect to future acquisitions a combination of Common Stock, cash and the
assumption of debt as consideration. In the event the Company issues Common
Stock to make future acquisitions, the Company's stockholders may experience
dilution in the net tangible book value per share of Common Stock and a regular
infusion of additional Common Stock into the capital
6
<PAGE>
markets. To the extent the Company is unable to use Common Stock to make future
acquisitions, its ability to grow may be adversely affected. The Company's
capital requirements also include working capital needs to maintain daily
operations and significant capital expenditures for cell construction and
expansion of its landfills, closure and post-closure care costs associated with
its landfills, equipment purchases, and debt repayment obligations and/or
financial assurance obligations. To the extent that generated cash is not
sufficient to meet the Company's capital needs, the Company will be required to
raise additional funds through bank borrowings (such as its existing credit
facility) and significant additional equity and/or debt financings. No assurance
can be given that additional funding will be available on terms favorable to the
Company.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL
The Company's operations are substantially dependent upon the services of
its executive officers, particularly Louis D. Paolino, Jr., the Chairman of the
Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President of the Company. The loss of the
services of Mr. Paolino or one or more of the other executive officers of the
Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and
results of operations. The Company does not maintain key-man life insurance
policies on its executive officers.
DEPENDENCE ON THIRD PARTY LANDFILLS
A substantial portion of the solid waste collected by the Company is
delivered to third party landfills under informal arrangements or without long-
term contracts. If these third parties increase their disposal fees and the
Company is unable to pass along the increase to its customers, or if these third
parties discontinue their arrangements with the Company and the Company is
unable to locate alternative disposal sites, the Company's business and results
of operations would be materially adversely affected.
EXTENSIVE PERMITTING AND LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
The Company is required to obtain and maintain in effect various federal,
state and local permits and licenses in connection with its solid waste
collection and transportation operations. The Company also is required to
obtain and maintain in effect various facility permits and other governmental
approvals, including those related to environmental, zoning and land use, in
order to develop and operate a landfill, a transfer station or a waste hauling
operation, and is required to obtain additional permits and approvals to expand
its existing landfill operations. These permits and approvals are difficult,
time consuming, and costly to obtain, may be subject to community opposition,
opposition by various local elected officials or citizens, regulatory delays and
other uncertainties, and may be dependent upon the Company's facilities being
included in state or local solid waste management plans and the Company's
entering into satisfactory host agreements with local communities. In addition,
operating permits may be subject to modification, renewal or revocation by the
issuing agencies after issuance, which may increase the Company's obligations
and reopen opportunities for opposition relating to the permits. Moreover, from
time to time, regulatory agencies may impose moratoria on, or otherwise delay,
the review or granting of these permits or approvals or such agencies may modify
the procedures or increase the stringency of the standards applicable to the
review or granting of such permits or approvals.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining
and maintaining in effect the permits and approvals required for the successful
operation and growth of its business, including permits and approvals required
for the development of additional disposal capacity needed to replace existing
capacity that becomes exhausted. The failure of the Company to obtain or
maintain in effect a permit or approval significant to its business would have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.
POTENTIAL PENNSYLVANIA LANDFILL RESTRICTIONS
One of the Company's Pennsylvania landfill operations, acquired by the
Company in December 1996, has been in existence since 1972. From 1972 to 1988,
the 110-acre area of the landfill which received waste or was authorized by
state permits to receive waste had either received all necessary local zoning
approvals or was not required by local ordinance to receive a zoning permit or
other approval to operate. In 1988, the Company received a state expansion
permit for a 32-acre lined expansion area increasing the size of the permitted
disposal area to 142 acres as well as a conditional use zoning approval from the
local township. However, in 1990, the township adopted a new zoning ordinance
which limited the height of municipal waste landfills to 35 feet above the
original land contour. The landfill, as permitted in 1988 and as currently
designed and permitted, exceeds the height limit in certain areas. The Company
has maintained that the current permitted area is an existing nonconforming use
and is not subject to the 35 foot height limitation imposed by the 1990
ordinance. If the
7
<PAGE>
township seeks to impose this limitation, and is successful, the existing
permitted capacity of the landfill would be materially reduced resulting in
significant costs to the Company.
KENTUCKY LANDFILL OBLIGATIONS
The Company ceased operations at its Somerset, Kentucky landfill on June
30, 1995 because the existing permitted disposal area did not meet current state
law design requirements. From June 30, 1995 to June 30, 1996, the Company
operated a transfer station at the landfill site and disposed of waste at an
alternate location. The Company simultaneously pursued a final state permit for
an expansion area designed to meet the new state standards. The suspension of
landfill operations and the diversion of waste to an alternate location had an
adverse effect on the Company's operating results and the Company discontinued
its transfer station operation on July 1, 1996. On July 1, 1997, the Company
recommenced operation of its transfer station to fulfill the obligations of the
disposal franchise until the Company's expansion area is completed. The Company
received a final permit to construct its expansion area on October 14, 1996
(reissued February 26, 1997). The final permit issued for the Kentucky landfill
expansion area incorporated the requirements contained in an October 8, 1996
Agreed Order which settled an administrative appeal filed by the Somerset
Pulaski County Concerned Citizens Group. Prior to actual construction of the
expansion area, the Company was required to complete an additional hydrogeologic
investigation to confirm the adequacy of the groundwater monitoring program
approved in the final permit. These studies are complete and indicate that the
groundwater monitoring program is adequate. The Company, however, has not yet
received final approval from the state regulatory authority with respect to the
final permit.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The Company is subject to extensive and evolving federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations that have become increasingly stringent in
recent years as a result of greater public interest in protecting the
environment. These laws and regulations affect the Company's business in many
ways and will continue to impose substantial costs on the Company.
The design, operation and closure of landfills is extensively regulated.
These regulations include, among others, the regulations establishing minimum
federal requirements adopted by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (the "EPA") in October 1991 under Subtitle D (the "Subtitle D
Regulations") of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA").
The Subtitle D Regulations, which generally became effective in October 1993,
include location restrictions, facility design standards, operating criteria,
closure and post-closure requirements, financial assurance requirements,
groundwater monitoring requirements, groundwater remediation standards, and
corrective action requirements. In addition, the Subtitle D Regulations require
that new landfill units meet more stringent liner design criteria (typically,
composite soil and synthetic liners or two or more synthetic liners) designed to
keep leachate out of groundwater and have extensive collection systems to
collect leachate for treatment prior to disposal. Groundwater monitoring wells
must also be installed at virtually all landfills to monitor groundwater quality
and, indirectly, the effectiveness of the leachate collection system operation.
The Subtitle D Regulations also require, where threshold test levels are
present, that methane gas generated at landfills be controlled in a manner that
protects human health and the environment. Each state is required to revise its
landfill regulations to meet these requirements or such requirements will be
automatically imposed upon it by the EPA. Each state is also required to adopt
and implement a permit program or other appropriate system to ensure that
landfills within the state comply with Subtitle D Regulations' criteria. Most
states have adopted extensive landfill regulations that have been updated or
replaced with new regulations consistent with, or more stringent than, the
Subtitle D Regulations. Failure to comply with these regulations could require
the Company to undertake investigatory or remedial activities, to curtail or
modify operations, or to close a landfill temporarily or permanently. Future
changes in federal or state regulations may require the Company to modify,
supplement or replace equipment or facilities at costs that may be substantial.
The failure of regulatory agencies to enforce these regulations vigorously or
consistently may give an advantage to competitors of the Company whose
facilities do not comply with the Subtitle D Regulations or its state
counterparts. The Company's ultimate financial obligations related to any
failure to comply with these regulations could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business and results of operations.
The Company is also regulated under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
of 1972 (the "Clean Water Act") and the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (the
"Clean Air Act"). The Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of pollutants
from a variety of sources, including landfills, into streams or other surface
waters. If runoff or collected leachate from the Company's landfills or
transfer stations is discharged into surface waters, the Clean Water Act would
require the Company to apply for and obtain a discharge permit, conduct sampling
and monitoring and, under certain circumstances, reduce the quantity of
pollutants in such discharge. Also, virtually all landfills are required to
comply with federal storm water regulations issued in November 1990, which are
designed to prevent contaminated landfill storm water runoff from flowing into
surface
8
<PAGE>
waters. The Clean Water Act also requires permits for discharges of fill
material into wetlands. These permits, which are occasionally required for
landfill construction or expansion, can take the form of categorical "nationwide
permits," for which little paperwork is required, or site specific permits,
which require detailed applications and extensive administrative review. Site-
specific permits are issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, with input from the
relevant state, pursuant to criteria developed by the U.S. EPA, and may require
mitigation measures such as the creation of substitute wetlands.
The Clean Air Act, including the 1990 amendments, provides for federal,
state and local regulation of emissions of air pollutants into the atmosphere,
including emissions resulting from landfill operations. The EPA recently
promulgated new standards regulating air emissions of certain regulated
pollutants from municipal solid waste landfills. The EPA and the states in
which the Company has operated also have adopted regulations under Title V of
the Clean Air Act requiring permits for certain disposal facilities. These
standards, combined with the new permitting programs established under the 1990
Clean Air Act amendments, will subject many of the Company's landfills to new
permitting requirements and may require the installation of gas recovery
systems. Landfills located in areas with air pollution problems may be subject
to even more extensive air pollution controls and emissions limitations. The
Company's continued compliance with these existing and future regulations may
impose a significant expense upon the Company which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, as amended ("OSHA"),
authorizes the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to promulgate
occupational safety and health standards. Various of those promulgated
standards, including standards for notices of hazards, safety in excavation and
the handling of asbestos, may apply to certain of the Company's operations.
OSHA regulations set forth requirements for the training of employees handling,
or who may be exposed in the work place to, concentrations of asbestos-
containing materials that exceed specified action levels. The OSHA regulations
also set standards for employee protection, including medical surveillance, the
use of respirators, protective clothing and decontamination units, during
asbestos demolition, removal, or encapsulation as well as its storage,
transportation, and disposal. In addition, OSHA specifies a maximum permissible
exposure level for airborne asbestos in the workplace. The Company has no
direct involvement in asbestos removal or abatement projects. However,
asbestos-containing waste materials are accepted at certain of the Company's
landfills that are authorized to accept such materials, and some of the
Company's collection businesses receive asbestos-containing waste materials
which have already been packaged and labeled. These packages are loaded onto
the Company's vehicles by employees of the asbestos abatement contractors for
transportation to and disposal at the Company's authorized landfills.
Accordingly, OSHA regulations designed to minimize employees' exposure to
airborne asbestos fibers and provide employees with proper training and
protection generally apply to the Company's operations in the transportation,
handling and disposal of asbestos waste.
In addition, most states and municipalities in which the Company operates
or may operate have adopted laws or requirements which limit or ban certain
categories of waste or mandate the disposal or recycling of local refuse. These
recycling laws and requirements have the effect of reducing landfill disposal
tonnage. Additionally, certain permits and approvals, as well as state and
local regulations, may seek to limit a landfill to accepting waste that
originates from specified geographic areas or seek to restrict the importation
of out-of-state waste. Legislative or regulatory restrictions generally have
not withstood judicial challenges. However, from time to time, federal
legislation is proposed which would allow individual states to prohibit the
disposal of out-of-state waste or to limit the amount that could be imported for
disposal. This legislation would also authorize in certain instances local
governmental units to mandate the flow of waste to certain designated facilities
or impose other flow control restrictions. Although no such federal legislation
has been enacted to date, if such federal legislation should be enacted in the
future, states in which the Company operates landfills could act to limit or
prohibit the importation of out-of-state waste or require the Company's
collection operations to utilize certain designated sites. Such federal or
state actions could have an adverse effect on the Company's landfills that
receive a significant portion of waste originating from other states and on the
Company's collection operations. A restriction on out-of-state waste also could
result in higher disposal costs for the Company's collection operations. If the
Company were unable to pass such higher costs through to its customers, the
Company's business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
9
<PAGE>
Each state in which the Company currently operates, or may operate in the
future, also has laws and regulations governing the generation, storage,
treatment, handling, transportation and disposal of solid waste, water and air
pollution and, in most cases, the siting, design, operation, maintenance,
closure and post-closure maintenance of landfills and other solid waste
management facilities. Many states also have programs that require
investigation and clean-up of sites containing hazardous materials in a manner
comparable to or more stringent than CERCLA. These statutes impose requirements
for investigation and clean-up of contaminated sites and liability for costs and
damages associated with such sites. Some of the state laws provide for the
imposition of liens on property owned by responsible parties. Many
municipalities also have ordinances, local laws and regulations affecting the
Company's operations. These include zoning and health measures that limit solid
waste management activities to specified sites or activities.
REGULATION BY NEW YORK CITY TRADE WASTE COMMISSION
In 1996, the New York City Council enacted Local Law 42 ("Local Law 42") in
order to control the corrupting influence of organized crime on the waste
hauling industry. Local Law 42 created the Trade Waste Commission (the "TWC")
and established rules for licensing and regulating the operations of the
commercial and industrial waste industry in New York City. The law prohibits
the collection, disposal or transfer of commercial and industrial waste without
a license issued by the TWC and requires TWC approval of all acquisitions or
other business combinations in New York City proposed by all licensees. Each
such acquisition or sale transaction generally must be submitted for review by
the TWC 30 days before the transaction takes effect, although the amount of time
required for review depends on the complexity of the transaction and the need to
investigate the background of the principals involved. In September 1997, one
of the Company's subsidiaries received a license from the TWC which enables it
to conduct New York City collections operations. The license, like all TWC
licenses, has a term of two years. The TWC also sets maximum rates for the
industry and establishes operational requirements. The Company's New York City
collection operations are subject to Local Law 42, which could preclude or
materially impact the Company's operations in this region, the time and cost of
completing future acquisitions in this region, and the rates which may be
charged for collection services.
PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATION
The rates that the Company may charge at its West Virginia landfill for the
disposal of municipal solid waste are regulated by the West Virginia Public
Service Commission. Rate regulation in West Virginia and the adoption of rate
regulation in other states in which the Company owns landfills could have an
adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.
POSSIBLE LEGAL ACTION
Companies in the solid waste management business, including the Company,
are frequently subject in the normal course of business to judicial and
administrative proceedings involving federal, state or local agencies or citizen
groups. These governmental agencies may seek to impose fines or penalties on
the Company, to revoke or deny renewal of the Company's operating permits or
licenses for violations or alleged violations of environmental laws or
regulations, or require that the Company make expenditures to remediate
potential environmental problems relating to waste disposed of or stored by the
Company or its predecessors, or resulting from its or its predecessors'
transportation and collection operations. Any adverse outcome in these
proceedings could have an adverse effect on the Company's business and results
of operations and may subject the Company to adverse publicity. The Company may
also be subject to actions brought by local governments, individuals or
community groups in connection with the permitting or licensing of its
operations, any alleged violation of such permits or licenses, or other
matters.
POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY
GENERAL. The Company is subject to liability for any environmental damage
that its solid waste facilities may cause to neighboring landowners,
particularly as a result of the contamination of drinking water sources or soil,
including damage resulting from the conditions existing prior to the acquisition
of such facilities by the Company. The Company also may be subject to liability
from any off-site environmental contamination caused by pollutants or hazardous
substances whose transportation, treatment or disposal was arranged by the
Company or its predecessors. Any substantial liability for environmental damage
incurred by the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business and results of operations.
10
<PAGE>
CERCLA imposes strict, joint, and several liability on the present owners
and operators of facilities from which a release of hazardous substances into
the environment has occurred, as well as any party that owned or operated the
facility at the time of disposal of the hazardous substances regardless of when
the hazardous substance was first detected. Similar liability is imposed upon
the generators of waste that contains hazardous substances and hazardous
substance transporters that select the treatment, storage, or disposal site.
All such persons, who are referred to as potentially responsible parties
("PRPs"), generally are jointly and severally liable for the expense of
investigation, clean-up and natural resource damages relating to environmental
contamination, regardless of whether they exercised due care or complied with
all relevant laws and regulations. These costs can be substantial. Liability
can be based upon the existence of even very small amounts of the more than 700
"hazardous substances" listed by the EPA and is not limited to the disposal of
"hazardous wastes," as statutorily defined. It is likely that hazardous
substances have in the past come to be located in landfills which the Company
has been associated as an owner or operator or as a result of its solid waste
collection operations. Moreover, the Company's solid waste collection
operations may have transported hazardous substances in the past and may do so
on occasion in the future.
The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ("NESHAPs")
regulate the collection, packaging, transportation and disposal of asbestos-
containing material. NESHAPs regulate visible emissions of asbestos fibers to
outside air and require emissions controls and appropriate work practices.
Asbestos is listed as a hazardous substance under CERCLA. A few states have
classified asbestos as hazardous waste and require appropriate handling and
disposal practices. The Company transports and disposes of asbestos-containing
materials. There can be no assurance that the Company will not face claims
resulting from environmental liabilities relating to these and other materials
in its solid waste management operations.
PENNSYLVANIA LANDFILL. Prior to 1990, one of the Company's Pennsylvania
landfills disposed of municipal solid waste in an unlined disposal area. This
unlined area was operated by the former owner and has caused localized
groundwater contamination. As a condition to a recent permit modification, the
Company has agreed to remove all waste from unlined areas to remove the source
of contamination and relocate the waste to a Subtitle D approved disposal area
at the landfill. For the period of trash relocation, the Company will operate a
groundwater removal and treatment system which has received a permit for the
associated surface water discharge. Relocation of solid waste began in April
1997 and is scheduled to be completed over a 12-year period in connection with
new pad construction. At December 31, 1997, the Company had accrued
approximately $5.4 million for such relocation. An additional condition of the
permit modification requires groundwater monitoring of five private water supply
wells off-site. Low levels of volatile organic compounds have been detected in
two of these private water supply wells. The Company has not established a
specific financial reserve for potential costs relating to this remediation or
any additional potential liabilities associated with this contamination, but it
is not expected to be significant. The Company currently believes that ultimate
resolution of these matters should not be material to it and should not have a
material adverse effect on its business or results of operations. However,
there can be no assurance that the Company's ultimate financial obligations
related to these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business and results of operations.
SUPERFUND LIABILITY. One of the Company's solid waste collection
subsidiaries is a party to a Superfund litigation, which has been settled by
substantially all of the defendants. The Company is being defended in this
action by one of its insurance carriers, which did not accept a $13,000
settlement offer. Because the settlement offer was not accepted, the Company
could be subject to claims for any deficiency between the amount contributed by
all settling parties and the actual costs of remediating the site. While the
Company has no reason to believe that any such claims will be asserted and has
no meaningful basis to estimate the amount of such claims, no assurances can be
given that they would not be brought or that the amount claimed would not be
substantial. Were any such claim to be asserted, the Company would expect to
vigorously defend them and believes that its liability, if any, would be either
covered by insurance or, under applicable law, the responsibility of the carrier
because of its failure to accept settlement. However, no assurances can be
given that insurance proceeds would cover the entire amount of the claim or that
the Company would prevail in any action against the carrier. Accordingly, there
can be no assurance that the Company's ultimate financial obligations related to
this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business
and results of operations.
POTENTIAL INADEQUACY OF ACCRUALS FOR CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE COSTS
The Company has material financial obligations relating to closure and
post-closure costs of the landfills it operates. While the precise amounts of
these future obligations cannot be determined, the Company estimated the total
costs to be approximately $27 .8 million for final closure of its landfills, of
which $8.5 million had been accrued at March 31, 1998. The Company makes an
accrual for these costs based on consumed airspace in relation to the
management's estimate of total available airspace of the landfills. Post-
closure monitoring costs pursuant to applicable regulations (generally for a
term of 30 to 40 years after final closure) are estimated at $17.1 million. At
March 31, 1998, the Company had accrued $5.5 million for
11
<PAGE>
such projected post-closure costs. The Company will provide additional accruals
based on engineering estimates of consumption of permitted landfill airspace
over the useful lives of its landfills. There can be no assurance that the
Company's ultimate financial obligations for actual closing or post-closing
costs will not exceed the amount then accrued and reserved or amounts otherwise
receivable pursuant to insurance policies or trust funds. Such a circumstance
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of
operations.
ABILITY TO MEET BONDING REQUIREMENTS
The Company is required to post a form of financial assurance at its
landfills to ensure proper closure and post-closure monitoring and maintenance.
Additionally, some of the Company's collection and transportation contracts
require performance and payment bonds to guarantee project completion and
certain states may require collateral bonds to secure compliance with hazardous
waste transportation requirements. The Company's ability to meet these bonding
requirements is contingent upon the Company's performance record and
creditworthiness. Any inability by the Company to maintain bonding capacity or
a sizable increase in payment could have a material adverse impact on the
Company's business and results of operations.
LIMITS ON INSURANCE COVERAGE
The Company carries insurance covering its assets and operations, including
pollution liability coverage. Specifically, each of the Company's landfills has
pollution liability coverage of $5.0 million per occurrence or $5.0 million in
the aggregate subject to a $500,000 deductible per occurrence. Nevertheless,
there can be no assurance that the Company's insurance will provide sufficient
coverage in the event an environmental claim is made against the Company or that
the Company will be able to maintain in place such insurance at reasonable
costs. An uninsured or underinsured claim against the Company of sufficient
magnitude could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and
results of operations. The Company also is subject to the risk of claims by
employees and others made after the expiration of the policy coverage period,
including asbestos-related illnesses (such as asbestosis, lung cancer,
mesothelioma and other cancers), which may not become apparent until many years
after exposure. From May 15, 1985 through April 28, 1988, the Company carried
claims-made general liability coverage. Any claims presented on the basis of
exposure during that period may not be covered by insurance and any liability
resulting therefrom could, consequently, have an adverse effect on the Company's
business and results of operations.
WASTE REDUCTION PROGRAMS
Alternatives to landfill disposal, such as recycling, incineration and
composting, are increasingly being used. There also has been an increasing
trend at the state and local levels to mandate recycling and waste reduction at
the source and to prohibit the disposal of certain types of wastes at landfills.
Many states (including states in which the Company operates) have enacted laws
that require counties to adopt comprehensive plans to reduce the volume of solid
waste deposited in landfills through waste planning, composting, recycling or
other programs. Some states (including most states in which the Company
operates) have adopted legislation that prohibits the disposal of yard waste,
tires, and other items in landfills. These developments could result in a
reduction in the volume of waste destined for landfills in certain areas, which
may affect the Company's ability to operate its landfills at their full capacity
and/or affect the prices that can be charged for landfill disposal services.
Such effects could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and
results of operations.
COMPETITION
The solid waste management industry is highly competitive and the Company
believes that industry consolidation will increase competitive pressures. The
Company competes with several large national waste management companies,
including Waste Management, Inc. (formerly WMX Technologies, Inc.), Browning
Ferris Industries, Inc., U.S.A. Waste Services, Inc., and Allied Waste
Industries, Inc. A number of these competitors have significantly greater
financial, technical, marketing and other resources than the Company. The
Company also competes with numerous well-established smaller, local or regional
firms. In addition, municipalities that operate their own waste collection and
disposal facilities often enjoy the benefits of tax-exempt financing and may
control the disposal of waste collected within their jurisdictions. Increased
competition from these companies or municipalities could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business and results of operations.
The Company provides residential collection services under municipal
contracts with terms ranging from one to five years. As is customary in the
waste management industry, such contracts come up for competitive bidding
periodically and
12
<PAGE>
there is no assurance that the Company will be the successful bidder or will be
able to retain such contracts. If the Company is unable to replace any contract
lost through the competitive bidding process with a comparable contract within a
reasonable time period or to use any surplus equipment in other service areas,
the Company's business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
SEASONALITY; ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
The Company's revenues tend to be somewhat lower in the winter months.
This is primarily attributable to the fact that the volume of waste relating to
construction and demolition activities tends to increase in the spring and
summer months and the volume of industrial and residential waste in the regions
in which the Company operates tends to decrease during the winter months. In
addition, particularly harsh weather conditions may affect the Company's
operations by interfering with collection, transportation and disposal
operations, delaying the development of landfill capacity, and/or reducing the
volume of waste generated by the Company's customers, which could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.
The Company's business is affected by general economic conditions, both
nationally and in the geographic regions in which the Company's operations are
currently located. There can be no assurance that a national or local economic
downturn will not result in a reduction in the volume of waste being collected,
transported and disposed of by the Company and/or the prices that the Company
can charge for its services.
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS; CHANGE IN CONTROL PROVISIONS
The Company's Certificate of Incorporate authorizes the issuance of up to
50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. No shares of preferred stock are
outstanding as of the date of this Prospectus. It is not possible to state the
precise effect of preferred stock upon the rights of the holders of the
Company's Common Stock until the Board of Directors determines the respective
preferences, limitations and relative rights of the holders of one or more
series or classes of the preferred stock. However, such effect might include:
(i) reduction of the amount otherwise available for payment of dividends on
Common Stock, to the extent dividends are payable on any issued shares of
preferred stock, and restrictions on dividends on Common Stock if dividends on
the preferred stock are in arrears; (ii) dilution of the voting power of the
Common Stock to the extent that the preferred stock has voting rights; and (iii)
the holders of Common Stock not being entitled to share in the Company's assets
upon liquidation until satisfaction of any liquidation preference granted to the
preferred stock.
The preferred stock may be viewed as having the effect of discouraging an
unsolicited attempt by another person or entity to acquire control of the
Company and may therefore have an anti-takeover effect. Issuances of authorized
preferred shares can be implemented and have been implemented by some companies
in recent years with voting or conversion privileges intended to make
acquisition of the Company more difficult or costly. Such an issuance could
discourage or limit the stockholders' participation in certain types of
transactions that might be proposed (such as a tender offer), whether or not
such transactions were favored by the majority of the stockholders, and could
enhance the ability of officers and directors to retain their positions.
In addition, certain of the Company's executive officers that have entered
into employment agreements with the Company will be entitled to receive certain
bonuses in cash or Common Stock upon a change in control of the Company in such
amounts that, in the aggregate, could have an adverse effect on the Company's
liquidity and capital resources. Accordingly, such provisions could discourage
or prevent bids to take over the Company and decrease values that would
otherwise be obtained by stockholders for their Common Stock.
The Company is subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits the Company from engaging
in a "business combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a period of
three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an
interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner. The application of Section 203 also could have the effect of
delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company without further action
by the stockholders.
CONTROL BY MANAGEMENT
Executive officers and directors of the Company as a group beneficially own
a significant amount of the outstanding Common Stock. As a result, these
existing stockholders, if acting together, will be able to influence
significantly the election of individuals to the Board of Directors and the
outcome of other matters submitted for stockholder consideration.
13
<PAGE>
VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE
The market price of the Common Stock has been and is likely to continue to
be highly volatile. Factors such as fluctuations in the Company's quarterly
revenues and operating results, the Company's ongoing acquisition program,
governmental regulations, market conditions for waste management Stocks in
general, and economic conditions generally may have a significant impact on the
market price of the Common Stock. In addition, as the Company pursues its
acquisition program, it may agree to issue shares of Common Stock that will
generally become available for resale which may have an impact on the market
price of the Common Stock.
LACK OF CASH DIVIDENDS ON COMMON STOCK
The Company does not expect to pay any cash dividends on the Common Stock
in the foreseeable future. Any cash otherwise available for such dividends will
be reinvested in the Company's business. In addition, the Company's current
credit facility agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends without prior
bank approval.
YEAR 2000 DISCLOSURE
Currently, there is significant uncertainty regarding the impact of the
Year 2000 on information systems, such as those used by the Company. The
Company does not currently believe that the effects of any Year 2000 non-
compliance on the Company's information systems should have any material adverse
impact on the Company's business or results of operations; however, there can be
no assurance that the Company will not incur expenses or experience business
disruption as a result of system problems associated with the century change.
USE OF PROCEEDS
All of the Shares offered hereby are being offered for the account of the
Registered Stockholders. The Company will not receive any of the proceeds of
the Offering.
THE COMPANY
The Company is a non-hazardous solid waste management company specializing
in the collection, transportation and disposal of residential, industrial,
commercial and special waste, principally in the eastern United States. In June
1996, the Company's Board of Directors and management team implemented an
aggressive acquisition program in the solid waste industry.
The Company believes that significant opportunities exist to acquire solid
waste collection, transportation and disposal businesses in the eastern United
States and to develop within its existing markets. As part of its acquisition
program, the Company reviews acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis and
is currently in various stages of negotiating the acquisition of additional
solid waste management businesses. There can be no assurance that any of such
acquisition negotiations will result in the actual acquisition of additional
solid waste management businesses.
The Company's principal executive offices are located at 1000 Crawford
Place, Suite 400, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, and its telephone number is
(609) 235-6009.
14
<PAGE>
REGISTERED STOCKHOLDERS
All of the 374,804 Shares included in this Prospectus were issued by the
Company in connection with acquisitions of solid waste management businesses
since March 1998, and all of the Shares are included in this Prospectus pursuant
to the exercise of registration rights granted the holders thereof in connection
with such acquisitions.
The following table lists the names of the persons whose Shares are covered
by this Prospectus (the "Registered Stockholders"), and for each, the number of
Shares beneficially owned at the commencement of the Offering, the number of
Shares being offered for sale and the number of Shares and percentage interest
of the Company to be beneficially owned after the Offering.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
SHARES
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED AT NUMBER OF SHARES OWNED
COMMENCEMENT SHARES BEING AFTER OFFERING
--------------
REGISTERED STOCKHOLDERS OF OFFERING OFFERED NUMBER PERCENT
- ----------------------- ----------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Michael Colombino 140,099 70,050 70,049 *
Phyllis B. Fidati 54,188(1) 48,241 300 *
Keith C. Fidati 47,104 47,104 -- --
Recycling Center of New Jersey, Inc. 43,769 43,769 -- --
Haulaway, Inc. 41,337 41,337 -- --
Larry Holgate 38,648 38,648 -- --
Kevin Holgate 38,648 38,648 -- --
Golden Gate Carting Co., Inc. 27,331 27,331 -- --
Sunrise Sanitation, Inc. 9,852 6,245 3,607 *
Anthony Rizzo, Jr. 7,783 3,892 3,891 *
Darren Rizzo 7,783 3,892 3,891 *
David and Phyllis Fidati, as tenants
by the entireties 5,657 5,647 -- --
</TABLE>
_______
* Less than 1%
1. Includes 5,647 shares held by David and Phyllis Fidati, as tenants by the
entireties, all of which are included in the Offering.
15
<PAGE>
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The Shares may be sold from time to time to purchasers directly by any of
the Registered Stockholders or by pledgees, donees, transferees or other
successors in interest, or, alternatively, any of the Registered Stockholders
may from time to time offer the Shares through dealers or agents, who may
receive compensation in the form of underwriting discounts, concessions or
commissions from a Registered Stockholder and/or the purchasers of the Shares
for whom they may act as agent. Any discounts, commissions or concessions
received by any such dealers or agents and any profits on the sale of Shares by
them may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the
Securities Act. This Prospectus may be used by any such pledgee, donee,
transferee or other successor in interest to offer and sell the Shares, provided
this Prospectus is appropriately supplemented to disclose the name and the
number of shares beneficially owned by such person.
The Shares may be sold from time to time in one or more transactions at a
fixed offering price, which may be changed, at varying prices determined at the
time of sale, or at negotiated prices. Such prices will be determined by a
Registered Stockholder or by agreement between a Registered Stockholder and/or
dealers. The Shares are listed on the Nasdaq National Market and may be sold in
transactions on the Nasdaq National Market. In addition, the Shares may be
sold, to the extent permitted, from time to time in transactions effected in
accordance with the provisions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
In connection with the offer and sale of the Shares, various state
securities laws and regulations require that any such offer and sale should be
made only through the use of a broker-dealer registered as such in any state
where a Registered Stockholder engages such broker-dealer and in any state where
such broker-dealer intends to offer and sell the Shares.
Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person
engaged in a distribution of the Shares may not bid for or purchase the Shares
until after such person has completed his or her participation in such
distribution, including the period of five business days prior to the
commencement of such distribution. In addition to and without limiting the
foregoing, the Registered Stockholders and any other person participating in
such distribution will be subject to other applicable provisions of the Exchange
Act and the Rules and Regulations thereunder, including without limitation
Regulation M, which provisions may affect the timing of purchases and sales of
any of the Shares by the Registered Stockholders and any such other person. All
of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the Shares and the ability of
any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the
Shares.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the securities offered hereby will be passed upon for the
Company by Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, counsel for
the Company.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of the Company as of June 30, 1997
and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1997
appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (dated May 20, 1998),
which are incorporated by reference herein, have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon included therein
and incorporated by reference herein which, as to each of the two years in the
period ended June 30, 1996, is based in part on the reports of Bardall,
Weintraub P.C. and Paternostro, Callahan, & DeFreitas, LLP, independent
auditors. Such financial statements are incorporated by reference herein in
reliance upon such reports given upon the authority of such firms as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of Allied Environmental Services, Inc.
and affiliates as of and for the period ended June 30, 1996 and 1995 and at and
for the years then ended appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated July 2, 1996, as amended by its Form 8-K/A dated July 10, 1997, which are
incorporated by reference herein, have been audited by BDO Seidman LLP,
independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon included therein and
incorporated by reference herein. Such financial statements are incorporated by
reference herein in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such
firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
16
<PAGE>
The combined financial statements of Allied Environmental Services, Inc.,
Allied Environmental Services, West, Inc., Allied Mid-Atlantic, Inc. and Allied
Waste Management, Inc. as of June 30, 1994 and for the year then ended appearing
in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 1996, as amended by
its Form 8-K/A dated July 10, 1997, which are incorporated by reference herein,
have been audited by B.J. Klinger & Co., P.C., independent auditors, as set
forth in their report thereon included therein and incorporated by reference
herein. Such financial statements are incorporated by reference herein in
reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of Super Kwik, Inc. and Waste Maintenance
Services, Inc. appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
September 27, 1996, as amended by its Form 8-K/A dated July 10, 1997, which are
incorporated by reference herein, have been audited by Bardall, Weintraub P.C.,
independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon included therein and
incorporated by reference herein. Such financial statements are incorporated by
reference herein in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such
firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of R&A Bender, Inc. and R&A Property, Ltd.
appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 1996,
as amended by its Form 8-K/A dated July 10, 1997, which are incorporated by
reference herein, have been audited by Boyer & Ritter, CPAs, independent
auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon included therein and
incorporated by reference herein. Such financial statements are incorporated by
reference herein in reliance upon such reports given upon the authority of such
firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of Donno Company, Inc. and affiliates
appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 1997, as
amended by its Form 8-K/A dated July 10, 1997, which are incorporated by
reference herein, have been audited by Paternostro, Callahan & DeFreitas, LLP,
independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon included therein and
incorporated by reference herein. Such financial statements are incorporated by
reference herein in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such
firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Apex Waste Services, Inc. appearing in the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 1997, as amended by its
Form 8-K/A dated July 10, 1997, which are incorporated by reference herein, have
been audited by Daniel P. Irwin & Associates, P.C., independent auditors, as set
forth in their report thereon included therein and incorporated by reference
herein. Such financial statements are incorporated by reference herein in
reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of Waste Services, Inc. and affiliates as
of December 31, 1996 and for the year then ended appearing in the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 12, 1997, as amended by its Forms 8-K/A
dated July 11, 1997 and July 25, 1997, which are incorporated by reference
herein, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set
forth in their report thereon included therein and incorporated herein by
reference. Such financial statements are incorporated herein by reference in
reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Pappy, Inc. as of October 31, 1996 and 1995 and
for the years then ended appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated August 15, 1997, as amended by its Form 8-K/A filed October 10, 1997,
which are incorporated by reference herein, have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon included therein
and incorporated by reference herein. Such financial statements are
incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon such report given upon the
authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Soil Remediation of Philadelphia, Inc. and USA
Waste of Fairless Hills, Inc. appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K dated August 20, 1997 as amended by its Form 8-K/A dated November 3, 1997,
which are incorporated by reference herein, have been audited by Daniel P. Irwin
& Associates, P.C., independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon
included therein and incorporated by reference herein. Such financial
statements are incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon such report
given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Pine Grove, Inc. as of December
31, 1996 and for the year then ended appearing in the Company's Current Report
on Form 8-K dated December 1, 1997 as amended by its Form 8-K/A dated February
17, 1998, which are incorporated by reference herein, have been audited by Ernst
& Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon included
therein and incorporated herein by reference. Such financial
17
<PAGE>
statements are incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon such report
given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Bluegrass Containment, Inc. appearing in the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 9, 1998, as amended by its Form
8-K/A dated April 8, 1998, which are incorporated by reference herein, have been
audited by Strothman & Company PSC, independent auditors, as set forth in their
report thereon included therein and incorporated by reference herein. Such
financial statements are incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon such
reports given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The combined financial statements of Hudson Jersey Sanitation Co. and
affiliates appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31,
1998, as amended by its Form 8-K/A dated April 24, 1998, which are incorporated
by reference herein, have been audited by Mills & DeFilippis, independent
auditors, as set forth in their report thereon included therein and incorporated
by reference herein. Such financial statements are incorporated by reference
herein in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Atlantic Waste Disposal, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and 1996 and for the years then ended
incorporated in this Prospectus by reference from the Company's Current Report
on Form 8-K dated April 20, 1998, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP,
independent auditors, as stated in their report, which is incorporated herein by
reference, and have been so incorporated in reliance upon the report of such
firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
18
<PAGE>
_______________
NO DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION NOT CONTAINED IN OR INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR
REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY,
THE REGISTERED STOCKHOLDERS OR ANY OTHER PERSON. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY OF THE
SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY IN ANY JURISDICTION TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS
UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH AN OFFER IN SUCH JURISDICTION. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF
THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES,
CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME
SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE HEREOF OR THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF
THE COMPANY SINCE SUCH DATE.
_______________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Available Information....................................................... 2
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference............................. 2
Risk Factors................................................................ 5
Use of Proceeds............................................................. 14
The Company................................................................. 14
Registered Stockholders..................................................... 15
Plan of Distribution........................................................ 16
Legal Matters............................................................... 16
Experts..................................................................... 16
</TABLE>
374,804 SHARES
COMMON STOCK
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
_______________
PROSPECTUS
JUNE 22, 1998
_______________
