BORG WARNER SECURITY CORP
DEFC14A, 1995-03-07
DETECTIVE, GUARD & ARMORED CAR SERVICES
Previous: SELIGMAN PORTFOLIOS INC/NY, 24F-2NT, 1995-03-07
Next: NATIONAL REALTY L P, SC 13D/A, 1995-03-07



                     SCHEDULE 14A
                SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant [ ]

Filed by a Party Other than the Registrant   [X ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement

[X] Definitive Proxy Statement   

[ ] Definitive Additional Materials

[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or
Section
        240.14a-12


Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter:  

Borg-Warner Security Corporation

Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement:  

Borg-Warner Shareholders Committee

Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box)

[X] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or
    14a-6(j)(2).
[ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange
Act 
    Rule 14a-6(i)(3).
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(4)
    and 0-11.
    1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
       ______________________________________________________

    2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies:
       ______________________________________________________

    3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed
       pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11: (1)
       ______________________________________________________

    4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
       ______________________________________________________

(1) Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated 
and state how it was determined.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting
fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by
registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
    1) Amount previously paid:
       _____________________
    2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
       _____________________
    3) Filing Party: ____________________

    Date Filed: _____________
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                        DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT
                   BORG-WARNER SHAREHOLDERS COMMITTEE   
                            25 Louisiana Avenue
                          Washington, D.C.  20001
                           Tel:  (202) 624-8100
                           Fax:  (202) 624-6833

                   INDEPENDENT SHAREHOLDER SOLICITATION
                     Re: Borg-Warner Security Corp..  
                      ANNUAL MEETING: APRIL 25, 1995
                                10:00 a.m.
                           200 S. Michigan Ave.
                               Chicago, Ill.

 
                                    Released to shareholders
                                    March 7, 1995

Dear fellow Borg-Warner Security Corp. shareholder, 

     You may well be disappointed in the performance of Borg-
Warner Security Corp.  We are writing to offer what we believe is
a necessary reform in turning around our company:  establishing
an independent director as a chairman of the board.

     Here is the record under the tenure of the current Chairman
and CEO Donald Trauscht:

     * The company stock slid from a high of nearly $22 in
January 1994 to $7, which it reached February 1, 1995. 

     * The company reported earnings of 3 cents a share for the  
fourth quarter of 1994, compared with 48 cents a share in the    
same quarter last year.  Before accounting for tax accruals,     
the company actually lost $10 million in the forth quarter. 

     * In January, 1995, Borg-Warner attributed its problems, in 
part, to "an unusually high rate of external theft, which     
caused unusually high cargo losses and higher insurance     
premiums," explained company spokesman Joe Allen to Reuters.     
in January 1995  (emphasis added).  We feel this is a disquieting
admission for a security company. 
 
     * After disclosing disappointing earnings in the third
quarter of 1994, the company said that "the escalating rate of
violent armed attacks against armored and automated-teller-
machine personnel is dramatically increasing security costs and  
insurance premiums throughout the industry." (emphasis added)

[GRAPH OF STOCK HISTORY FROM IPO TO 2/95:]

Date           Borg-Warner closing price

2/93           21
3/93           20.6
4/93           21.25
5/93           20.8
6/93           20.6
7/93           19.25
8/93           21.4
9/93           19.75
10/93          20
11/93          20.25
12/93          20.5
1/94           21.8
2/94           18.5
3/94           16.8
4/94           14.8
5/94           14.25
6/94           11.25
7/94           11.25
8/94           12.1
9/94           10.8
10/94          10.4
11/94          9.4
12/94          9.75
1/95           8.12
2/95           6.6

     * Similar problems plagued the company in 1993, when a memo
to all Wells Fargo Armored/ATM associates pointed out that its 
$18 million in claims and insurance premiums associated with     
theft, negligence, worker's compensation, vehicle accidents     
and general liability claims "is almost double the profit     
income of the company."

     * Crain's Chicago Business identified the company as
"biggest loser" of the week in stock trading between Jan. 30 and
Feb. 3.

     * Competitor Brinks reported an 18% increase in its 4th     
quarter earnings, compared with the 4th quarter of 1993.     
Brinks reported record operating profit in 1994.  Brinks     
competes with Borg-Warner's guard and armored truck units. 

[GRAPH COMPARING STOCK PRICES:]

Date      Borg-Warner closing price          Dow Jones Index and
          (Indexed to 100)                   Commercial Services
                                             (Indexed to 100)

2/93      100                                457.797   100
3/93      98.09524                           457       99.82591
4/93      101.1905                           434       94.80184
5/93      99.04762                           443       96.76778
6/93      98.09524                           498       108.7818  
7/93      91.66667                           493       107.6897
8/93      101.9048                           487       106.379
9/93      94.04762                           484       105.7237
10/93     95.2381                            474       103.5393
11/93     96.42857                           477       104.1947
12/93     97.61905                           491       107.2528
1/94      103.8095                           516       112.7137
2/94      88.09524                           496       108.345
3/94      80                                 456       99.60747  
4/94      70.47619                           470       102.6656
5/94      67.85714                           472       103.1025
6/94      53.57143                           455       99.38903
7/94      53.57143                           465       101.5734
8/94      57.61905                           496       108.345
9/94      51.42857                           481       105.0684
10/94     49.52381                           477       104.1947
11/94     44.7619                            457       99.82591
12/94     46.42857                           463       101.1365
1/95      38.66667                           470       102.6656
2/95      31.42857                           498       108.7818

This graph compares the percentage change in share prices        
of Borg-Warner Security Corp. and the Dow Jones Industrial &
Commercial Services Index. This index was used by the company in
its 1994 proxy, where it is described as tracking "the price
performance of equity securities of companies that provide
services to other commercial enterprises." This graph illustrates
what would have happened if $100 were invested in Borg-Warner   
in February 1993, compared with $100 invested in the index. 

     In November, 1994, Standard & Poors along with Duff & Phelps
placed Borg-Warner on "watch" for a possible downgrade of its
long-term debt. In February, 1995, Standard & Poors reiterated
that it held the company on "CreditWatch" with "negative
implications." S&P explained that the "potential for covenant
violations at future periods remains due to continued subpar
financial performance."  (emphasis added)

     * On November 21, 1994 Reuters reported that "Due to lower  
than expected earnings from the company's transportation and     
alarm units, Borg-Warner expects that at year end it may not     
be in compliance with all of its bank covenants."

     * Major shareholders have abandoned their positions,
including Ariel, the second largest shareholder which sold its
entire 9% stake of the company, Hartford Fire Insurance, National
City Bank/Columbus, and Prudential Insurance Co. In the fourth   
quarter of 1994, Wood Island Associates, Delphi Management,      
and Russell Frank each reduced their positions by at least     
100,000 shares.

     These are critical times for Borg-Warner.  As the cascading
stock price, credit-rating alerts and loan renegotiations attest,
our company's own security is on the line.  Shareholders deserve
careful, independent scrutiny over the decisions that will
determine the fate of our company. 

                               THE PROPOSAL:

     We question whether the board's current structure allows it
to exercise the oversight necessary to steer this company on a
path of earnings growth.   The company's governance rules include
measures that we believe frustrate shareholder accountability,
including a classified board, an 80% supermajority voting
requirement to make changes, and restrictions of shareholders
calling a special meeting. 

     In reforming what we believe to be board insulation from
shareholder accountability, we maintain that the first step is
establishing an independent chairman.  

     We have alerted company management that we intend to bring
the following resolution to shareholders at the company's annual
meeting:

     Resolved: That the Chairman of the Board of directors must
be an independent director who does not also hold the position of
Chief Executive Officer. 

     We do not know whether the company will include this
proposal in its proxy materials, but regardless, we will present
this proposal at the meeting. If the proposal is approved by a
majority of shares, we hope the board will select a chairman who
is not a company manager.  Because this resolution does not amend
the bylaws, the Board may lawfully view this proposal as
precatory under Delaware law, where the company is incorporated. 
This means that even if a majority of shares approves the
proposal, it may not have any effect unless the board acts on it;
just because it is approved does not mean the board must act on
it.

     We urge you to support this proposal. 
 
                    BORG-WARNER SHAREHOLDERS COMMITTEE

     The sole members of the shareholder committee at this time
are William B. Patterson, Director of Corporate Affairs,
International Brotherhood of Teamsters ("IBT"), and Thomas
Metzinger, IBT Director of Investments. 

                         MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION-
        SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL
                              SHAREHOLDERS      

     The committee incorporates herein by reference the
discussion of these subjects in the Company's 1994 proxy
statement and the forthcoming 1995 proxy statement.


                            PROPOSALS FOR 1996 MEETINGS

     Stockholders who wish to have their proposals considered for
inclusion in the Company's proxy statement should deliver their
proposals in writing to the Company at 200 South Michigan Avenue,
Chicago, Ill., 60604, by a date that will be identified in the
Company's upcoming proxy statement.

           IMPORTANT INFORMATION RE:  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND  
                            VOTING RIGHTS

     We have not supplied you with a proxy card at this time
because at the 1995 meeting, shareholders will be also asked to
vote in the election for board of directors and may be asked to
vote on other matters (currently unknown to the Committee).  Once
those nominees have been announced, we will revise our proxy
materials to include the nominees and any other matters to be
voted upon.  We will make these revised materials available to
shareholders so they may direct our votes on these other matters.

The Committee does not know of any contest for the board of
directors and does not intend to engage in one.  Giving the
Committee a proxy will not give the Committee any discretionary
voting authority.

     We incorporate by reference the additional information about
voting requirements contained in the Company's 1995 proxy
statement, such as the record date and outstanding shares. 
According to the company's 1994 proxy statement, there were
21,731,057 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. Each
share of Common Stock entitled the holder to one vote. Holders of
the Company's Series I Non-Voting Common Stock are not entitled
to notice of, or to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Last year, the
record date was March 15, 1994. 

                             REVOCATION RIGHTS

     A proxy card is revocable at any time prior to being voted
by (1) executing a new proxy card; or (2) attending and voting at
the meeting; or (3) delivering written notice of revocation to
the Company or to the authorized agents of the employee benefit
plan through which your stock is held.  Only your latest-dated
proxy card will be counted.

                          SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

  We expect to solicit proxies by mail, telephone, telecopier and
personal interviews.  We will ask trustees, brokers, custodians
and other nominees to forward solicitation materials to the
beneficial owners of common stock, and reimburse them for their
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.  Proxies will be solicited by
Committee members and by members and employees of IBT, who do not
receive any additional compensation for such solicitations.  No
other specially engaged employees have been employed to solicit
shareholders.
     
     The Committee is sponsored by the IBT, which owns 100 shares
of Borg-Warner's common stock.  Other shareholders are invited to
join the Committee.  The cost of solicitation is being borne by
IBT.  While the exact cost of the solicitation is not at this
time known, it is estimated at $1,000.  About 4,000 employees of
the Pony Express Courier Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Borg-Warner Security Corp., are represented by IBT.  Pony Express
has never entered into a collective bargaining agreement, and in
the past 12 months, Pony Express employees have gone on strike at
several locations. 
 
*  *  *

For more information contact:

Borg-Warner Shareholders Committee
25 Louisiana Avenue
Washington, DC  20001
Fax 202-624-6833
Telephone: 202-624-8100

 






© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission