SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (Fee Required) For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
or
[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (No Fee Required) For the transition period from
__________ to __________.
Commission File Number 0-16109
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 94-2875566
-------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization)
3696 Haven Avenue, Redwood City, California 94063
- ------------------------------------------- -----
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (415) 366-2626
--------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None
----
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
Common Stock ($.01 par value)
-----------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (ss.229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will
not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy
or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock of the registrant held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant as of February 28, 1997, was $149,602,066. (1)
As of February 28, 1997, 18,412,562 shares of registrant's Common Stock, $.01
par value, were outstanding.
Exhibit Index at Page 35
Total Pages 35
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Excludes 5,668,132 shares held by directors, officers and shareholders
whose ownership exceeds 5% of the outstanding shares at February 28,
1997. Exclusion of such shares should not be construed as indicating
that the holders thereof possess the power, direct or indirect, to
direct the management or policies of the registrant, or that such person
is controlled by or under common control with the registrant.
<PAGE>
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document
-------- Form
10-K
Part
----
Definitive Proxy Statement to be used III
in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
i
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item Page
---- ----
PART I
1. Business ___________________________________________________________ 1
2. Properties _________________________________________________________ 9
3. Legal Proceedings __________________________________________________ 9
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ________________ 9
PART II
5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Shareholder Matters _______________________________________________ 9
6. Selected Financial Data ____________________________________________10
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations __________________________________________10
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ________________________14
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure ___________________________________________29
PART III
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant _________________29
11. Executive Compensation _____________________________________________29
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management _____29
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions _____________________29
PART IV
14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K ___30
Signatures _________________________________________________________32
ii
<PAGE>
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION-FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
To the extent that this report discusses future financial projections,
information or expectations about our products or markets, or otherwise makes
statements about future events, such statements are forward-looking and are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from the statements made. These include, among others,
uncertainty associated with timely approval, launch and acceptance of new
products, the costs associated with new product introductions, as well as other
factors described below under the headings "APS Technology", "Products",
"Manufacturing", "Marketing", "Government Regulation", "Patents and Trade
Secrets" and "Competition". In addition, such risks and uncertainties also
include the matters discussed under Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 below.
THE COMPANY
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries ("APS" or the "Company") is
using its patented Microsponge(R) delivery systems and related proprietary
technologies to enhance the safety, effectiveness and aesthetic quality of
topical prescription, over-the-counter ("OTC") and personal care products. The
Company is currently manufacturing and selling Microsponge systems for use by
corporate customers in almost 100 different cosmetic and personal care products
sold worldwide. APS holds 188 issued U.S. and foreign patents on its technology
and has over 68 other patent applications pending.
The Company, founded in February 1983 as a California corporation under the name
AMCO Polymerics, Inc., changed its name to Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. in
1984 and was reincorporated in Delaware in 1987.
Products under development or in the marketplace utilize the Company's
Microsponge systems in three primary ways: 1) as reservoirs releasing active
ingredients over an extended period of time, 2) as receptacles for absorbing
undesirable substances, such as excess skin oils, or 3) as closed containers
holding ingredients away from the skin for superficial action. The resulting
benefits include extended efficacy, reduced skin irritation, cosmetic elegance,
formulation flexibility and improved product stability.
In February 1997, the Company received FDA approval for the first ethical
pharmaceutical product based on its patented Microsponge technology - Retin
A(R)-Micro(TM) - which has been licensed to Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical
Corporation, a member of the Johnson & Johnson ("J&J") family of companies. This
product was launched in March 1997. In September 1994, the Company submitted a
New Drug Application (NDA) for a melanin-Microsponge sunscreen. The NDA was
found to be non-approvable pending additional information which the Company is
continuing to provide.
APS has established several alliances with multinational corporations including
J&J and Rhone-Poulenc Rorer to develop products which incorporate Microsponge
systems. In general, these alliances provide for the client companies to pay the
costs of product development, clinical testing, regulatory approval and
commercialization. In return, the clients receive certain marketing rights to
the products developed. APS typically receives an initial cash infusion in the
form of license fees, future payments contingent on the achievement of certain
milestones, revenues from the manufacture of Microsponge systems, and royalty
payments based on third party product sales. J&J and Rhone-Poulenc Rorer also
have made equity investments in the Company. APS and Dow Corning Corporation
formed a joint venture alliance in 1992 to develop and commercialize Polytrap(R)
and Microsponge systems for use in the manufacture of cosmetics and personal
care products. In the first quarter of 1996, APS acquired all rights to the
Polytrap technology from Dow Corning in exchange for 200,000 shares of APS
common stock.
Effective January 1997, the Company licensed its consumer products to Lander
Company in the United States and Canada in return for guaranteed minimum
royalties, revenues from the sale of Microsponge systems and research and
development funding for new consumer products. Lander will be responsible for
all aspects of commercialization including selling, marketing, manufacturing,
distribution and customer service. Also as part of its long-term strategic plan
to move away from the direct marketing of consumer products, the Company plans
to discontinue the marketing of its in-licensed suncare products.
1
<PAGE>
To maintain quality control over manufacturing, APS has committed significant
resources to its production processes and polymer systems development programs.
The Company's manufacturing facility in Lafayette, Louisiana, is responsible for
large-scale production of Microsponge systems and related technologies. All
products are manufactured according to Current Good Manufacturing Practices
guidelines ("CGMPs") established by the FDA. In addition, APS has a process
development pilot plant in its Louisiana facility. APS also has established
relationships with contract manufacturers, which provide second-source
production capabilities to handle growing product demand. The Company's
objective is to utilize these third parties selectively, so that it can maintain
its flexibility and direct the bulk of APS' capital resources to other areas
such as product and technology development.
APS TECHNOLOGY
The fundamental appeal of the Company's Microsponge technology stems from the
difficulty experienced with conventional formulations in releasing active
ingredients over an extended period of time. Cosmetics and skin care
preparations are intended to work only on the outer layers of the skin. Yet, the
typical active ingredient in conventional products is present in a relatively
high concentration and, when applied to the skin, may be rapidly absorbed. The
common result is over-medication, followed by a period of under-medication until
the next application. Rashes and more serious side effects can occur when the
active ingredients rapidly penetrate below the skin's surface. APS' Microsponge
technology is designed to allow a prolonged rate of release of the active
ingredients, thereby offering potential reduction in the side effects while
maintaining the therapeutic efficacy.
Microsponge Systems. The Company's Microsponge systems are based on microscopic,
polymer-based microspheres that can bind, suspend or entrap a wide variety of
substances and then be incorporated into a formulated product, such as a gel,
cream, liquid or powder. A single Microsponge is as tiny as a particle of talcum
powder, measuring less than one-thousandth of an inch in diameter. Like a true
sponge, each microsphere consists of a myriad of interconnecting voids within a
non-collapsible structure that can accept a wide variety of substances. The
outer surface is typically porous, allowing the controlled flow of substances
into and out of the sphere. Several primary characteristics, or parameters, of
the Microsponge system can be defined during the production phase to obtain
spheres that are tailored to specific product applications and vehicle
compatibility.
Polymeric (R) Systems. In January 1996, the Company signed a definitive
agreement with Dow Corning Corporation, one of the world's largest suppliers of
ingredients used in cosmetics and personal care products, to acquire full rights
to Dow Corning's Polytrap(R) technology and full responsibility for the
continuing commercialization of Polytrap systems in exchange for 200,000 shares
of APS common stock. Polytrap systems are designed to: 1) absorb skin oils and
eliminate shine, 2) provide a smooth and silky feel to product formulations, 3)
entrap and deliver various ingredients in personal care products and 4) convert
liquids into powders.
Microsponge and Polytrap systems are made of biologically inert polymers.
Extensive safety studies have demonstrated that the polymers are non-irritating,
non-mutagenic, non-allergenic, non-toxic and non-biodegradable. As a result, the
human body cannot convert them into other substances or break them down.
Furthermore, although they are microscopic in size, these systems are too large
to pass through the stratum corneum (skin surface) when incorporated into
topical products.
Colon-specific Systems. A Microsponge system offers the potential to hold active
ingredients in a protected environment and provide controlled delivery of oral
medication to the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, where it will be released
upon exposure to specific enzymes in the colon. This approach if successful,
should open up entirely new opportunities for APS.
2
<PAGE>
Bioerodible Systems. The Company is also developing systems based on new
bioerodible polymers for the delivery of small and large molecule drugs,
including proteins and peptides, which, if successful, should open up new fields
of opportunity in systemic drug delivery arenas.
PRODUCTS
APS is focusing its efforts primarily on the ethical dermatology, OTC skin care
and personal care markets in which Microsponge systems can provide substantial
advantages. Certain additional applications for the Company's technology are
also under development, as noted below.
Ethical Dermatology
APS defines "ethical dermatology" products as prescription and non-prescription
drugs that are promoted primarily through the medical profession for the
prevention and treatment of skin problems or diseases. The Company is developing
several ethical dermatology products which will require approval of the FDA
before they can be sold in the United States. Although these pharmaceuticals are
likely to take longer to reach the marketplace than OTC and personal care
products, due to the regulatory approval process, the Company believes that the
benefits offered by Microsponge delivery systems will allow valuable product
differentiation in this large and potentially profitable market. Results from
various human clinical studies reaffirm that this technology offers the
potential to reduce the drug side effects, maintain the therapeutic efficacy and
potentially increase patient compliance with the treatment regimen. The
following ethical dermatology products have been developed or are under
development by APS:
Tretinoin Acne Medication. In February 1997, the Company received FDA approval
for Microsponge-entrapped tretinoin for improved acne treatment. This submission
to the FDA represented the culmination of an intensive research and clinical
development program involving approximately 1,150 patients. Tretinoin has been
marketed in the U.S. by Ortho Dermatological, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary,
under the brand name RETIN-A(R) since 1971. It has proven to be a highly
effective topical acne medication. However, skin irritation among sensitive
individuals can limit patient compliance with the prescribed therapy. The
Company believes its patented approach to drug delivery reduces the potentially
irritating side effects of tretinoin. Ortho Dermatological began marketing this
product in March 1997.
Melanin-Microsponge Sunscreen. Concern about the sun's harmful effects and its
role in aging and skin cancer has resulted in heightened awareness of
preventative measures in the sunscreen market. APS has developed a sun
protectant designed to provide the highest-available protection against the
sun's UVA rays as well as protection from the burning UVB rays. This unique APS
product candidate incorporates the Company's melanin-Microsponge system
containing genetically engineered melanin, a natural pigment found in skin.
The Company filed its NDA in September 1994 for marketing clearance. Since it
involves an entirely new ethical pharmaceutical ingredient and application, the
regulatory review process is lengthier and more complex. The NDA was found to be
non-approvable pending additional information which the Company is continuing to
provide. There can be no assurance that FDA approval will be received. If
approval is received, the Company plans to market this product through a
strategic partner.
5-Fluorouracil. Another ethical dermatology product candidate,
Microsponge-entrapped 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), was the subject of an
Investigational New Drug ("IND") filing in early 1995. 5-FU is an effective
chemotherapeutic agent for treating actinic keratosis, a pre-cancerous,
hardened-skin condition caused by excessive exposure to sunlight. However,
3
<PAGE>
patient compliance with the treatment regimen is poor, due to significant,
adverse side effects. Through a joint agreement with Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, the
Company is developing a Microsponge-enhanced topical formulation that
potentially offers a less irritating solution for treating actinic keratosis.
Phase II clinical studies have been completed and Phase III clinical studies
are scheduled to commence in mid-1997.
Tretinoin Photodamage Treatment. Initial product development was undertaken in
1994 to develop a Microsponge system product for the treatment of photodamage,
which contributes to the premature aging of skin and has been implicated in skin
cancer. Should an IND be filed for this product, funding for this second
tretinoin treatment indication will be provided by J&J's Ortho-McNeil
Pharmaceutical subsidiary.
Cosmeceutical Products
Retinol. Retinol is a highly pure form of vitamin A which has demonstrated a
remarkable ability for maintaining the skin's youthful appearance. However, it
has been available only on a limited basis because it becomes unstable when
mixed with other ingredients. APS has been able to stabilize retinol in a
formulation which is cosmetically elegant and which has a low potential for skin
irritation. The Company has executed agreements with three companies, each of
which have marketing strength in a particular channel of distribution. The
channels for which the Company has licensed retinol are direct marketing (Avon),
dermatologists (Medicis) and salons and spas (Sothys). The Company retains full
rights to alternate channels of distribution, including department stores and
other mass merchandisers.
Personal Care and OTC Products
APS technologies are ideal for skin and personal care products. They can retain
several times their weight in liquids, respond to a variety of release stimuli,
and absorb large amounts of excess skin oil, all while retaining an elegant feel
on the skin's surface. In fact, APS technologies are currently employed in
almost 100 products sold by major cosmetic and toiletry companies worldwide.
Among these products are skin cleansers, conditioners, oil control lotions,
moisturizers, deodorants, razors, lipstick, makeup, powders, and eye shadows.
Entrapping cosmetic ingredients in APS' proprietary Microsponge delivery systems
offers several advantages, including improved physical and chemical stability,
greater available concentrations, controlled release of the active ingredients,
reduced skin irritation and sensitization, and unique tactile qualities.
Other Product Applications
While not the principal focus of APS development efforts, other products could
benefit from the value-added application of the Company's polymer technology. To
date, the Company has chosen to apply its technology to the following
non-skin-care field:
Analytical Standards. APS initially developed microsphere precursors to the
Microsponge for use as a testing standard for gauging the purity of municipal
drinking water. Marketed by APS nationwide, these microspheres are suspended in
pure water to form an accurate, stable, reproducible turbidity standard for the
calibration of turbidimeters used to test water purity.
APS believes its Analytical Standards technology has much broader applications
than testing the turbidity of water. The Company has begun to develop standards
for industrial use for the calibration of spectrophotometers and colorimeters.
4
<PAGE>
MANUFACTURING
Polymer Raw Material. Raw materials for the Company's polymers are
petroleum-based monomers which are widely available at low cost. The monomers
have not been subject to unavailability or significant price fluctuations. Raw
material costs generally account for less than a third of the total cost of the
Company's products.
Process Engineering and Development. The Company employs chemical engineers and
operates a pilot-plant facility for developing production processes. The
equipment used for manufacturing and process development is commercially
available in industrial sizes and is installed in the Company's production
facility in Lafayette, Louisiana.
Microsponge Production. APS has committed significant resources to the
production process and polymer systems development required to commercialize its
products. The Company has to date manufactured most Microsponge systems in
company-owned and operated facilities.
The Company's manufacturing facility in Lafayette, Louisiana, is responsible for
large-scale production of Microsponge systems and related technologies. APS also
has established relationships with contract manufacturers which provide
second-source production capabilities. The Company's objective is to utilize
these third parties selectively, so that it can maintain its flexibility and
direct the bulk of APS' capital resources to other areas, such as product
development and marketing. All products are manufactured according to CGMP. In
addition, APS has a process development pilot plant in its Louisiana facility.
MARKETING
A key part of APS' business strategy is to ally the Company with major marketing
partners. The Company has therefore negotiated several agreements for the
development of Microsponge delivery systems, the supply of entrapped
ingredients, and the marketing of formulated products. To create an incentive
for APS to develop products as quickly as possible, these development and
license agreements provide, in some cases, for substantial payments by the
client companies during the period of product development and test marketing.
Additionally, some agreements provide for non-refundable payments on the
achievement of certain key milestones, royalties on sales of formulated
products, and minimum annual payments to maintain exclusivity. APS has, in some
product areas, retained co-marketing rights.
In general, APS grants limited marketing exclusivity in defined markets to
client companies, while retaining the right to manufacture the Microsponge
delivery systems it develops for these clients. However, after development is
completed and a client commercializes a formulated product utilizing the
Company's delivery systems, APS can exert only limited influence
5
<PAGE>
over the manner and extent of the client's marketing efforts. APS' client
companies may cancel their agreements without penalty.
The Company's material agreements and relationships are set forth below:
Johnson & Johnson Inc. In May 1992, APS and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical
Corporation ("Ortho"), a subsidiary of J&J, entered into a licensing agreement
related to tretinoin-based products incorporating APS' Microsponge technology.
As part of the agreement, in 1992, license fees of $6,000,000 were paid to APS.
In addition, Johnson & Johnson purchased 723,006 shares of newly issued APS
common stock for $8,000,000. In 1994, J&J purchased 1,000,000 additional shares
of newly issued common stock for $5,000,000. J&J also received 200,000 warrants
that expired in 1996. The number of shares issuable to J&J was increased by
432,101 pursuant to an agreed upon formula tied to the trading price of APS
stock prior to January 1996. The license fee provides Ortho with exclusive
distribution or license rights for all Ortho tretinoin products utilizing the
APS Microsponge system. Ortho's exclusivity will continue as long as certain
annual minimum payments are made. In addition, Ortho will pay license fees and
milestone payments over time to APS. APS will also receive royalty payments on
net product sales worldwide.
In February 1997, APS received FDA approval for the first product covered by
this agreement, Microsponge-entrapped tretinoin. This product will be marketed
by Ortho Dermatological beginning March 1997. APS received a milestone payment
of $3,000,000 from Ortho upon receipt of the approval.
In December 1996, the Company purchased the Take-Off(R) trademark from Johnson &
Johnson Consumer Products, Inc. for a royalty of 3% on net sales of Take-Off
products with annual minimums for five years. Effective January, 1997, this
product was licensed to Lander Company.
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer. In March 1992, APS and Rhone-Poulenc Rorer ("RPR")
restructured their 1989 joint venture agreement to give APS more freedom in
developing products. Under the new terms, APS has regained from RPR worldwide
marketing rights to products in the prescription dermatology field, including
the melanin-based sunscreen product in which RPR had invested approximately
$4,000,000 in development costs. APS also gained ownership of a
partially-completed manufacturing facility in Vacaville, California, which the
Company sold in December 1995. Also under the new terms, RPR invested $2,000,000
in cash in APS and relieved APS of the obligation to repay a $1,500,000 advance.
In return, RPR received 705,041 shares of APS stock and maintains a minority
share in the potential net profits of the melanin-based sunscreen product.
Furthermore, RPR has agreed to continue funding the exploration and development
of certain dermatology applications of APS' technology in which APS shares
marketing rights. Product applications include a 5-FU treatment for
pre-cancerous actinic keratosis. In 1995, RPR filed an IND application to begin
human clinical testing of 5-FU. Phase II clinical trials for 5-FU have been
completed and Phase III clinical trials are scheduled to commence in mid 1997.
Dow Corning. In July 1991, APS and Dow Corning Corporation formed a
collaborative alliance to manufacture and sell both APS' Microsponge and Dow
Corning's Polytrap technologies worldwide in the cosmetics and toiletries field.
Under the agreement, Dow Corning provided financial assistance in this venture,
as well as worldwide sales and support services; APS contributed its technology,
research and development, technical support and manufacturing capability for
both the Microsponge and Polytrap products. In the first quarter of 1996, APS
acquired full rights to the Polytrap technology and full responsibility for the
continuing commercialization in exchange for 200,000 shares of APS common stock.
Lander Company. In March 1996, the Company formed a collaboration with Lander
Company, Inc. to develop and provide premium quality, store-brand personal care
products based on the Company's patented delivery system technology. Under terms
of the agreement, the Company received a $3 million equity investment and
license fees and will receive additional licensing fees, royalties on product
sales and research and development funding for new consumer products. APS and
Lander will collaborate on product formulations and marketing preparations and
Lander will be responsible for sales, manufacturing and distribution to
retailers.
Effective January 1997, APS established a new strategic alliance with Lander
under which Lander was granted full marketing rights in the United States and
Canada to Microsponge-based Exact(R) acne medications, Take-Off(R) facial
6
<PAGE>
cleansers, Everystep(R) Foot Powder, as well as in-licensed consumer products.
Under terms of the agreement, Lander will be responsible for all aspects of
commercialization including selling, marketing, manufacturing, distribution and
customer service. APS will receive guaranteed minimum royalties, revenues from
the sale of Microsponge systems and research and development funding for new
branded consumer products.
Avon. In August 1996, APS signed a license and supply agreement with Avon under
which APS is providing Avon with a formulation incorporating Microsponge
delivery systems and retinol, an ingredient developed to improve the appearance
of aging skin. Under terms of the agreement, APS received upfront licensing fees
and will receive manufacturing revenues on supply of product.
Medicis. In October 1996, APS entered into an agreement with Medicis
Pharmaceutical Corporation for the commercialization of dermatology products.
Medicis will initially be responsible for marketing two newly developed APS
products in the United States. In return, APS received an upfront licensing fee,
and will receive an additional licensing fee and a share of revenues, with
guaranteed minimums.
Procter & Gamble. In the first quarter of 1992, after having been one of APS'
original licensees in 1987, Scott Paper Company began the regional U.S. launch
of Baby Fresh with Ultra Guard baby wipes. Ultra Guard is Scott's trademark for
an APS Microsponge system that contains dimethicone to help protect a baby's
skin from diaper rash. In early 1993, Scott achieved national distribution for
Baby Fresh with Ultra Guard. In the first quarter of 1996, Kimberly-Clark
completed its acquisition of Scott Paper Company. One of the conditions of the
acquisition imposed by the Federal Trade Commission was that Kimberly-Clark
divest the acquired baby wipe business. Procter & Gamble bought the baby wipe
business in 1996 and now markets the product under the Pampers brand name.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
Ethical Products
In order to clinically test, produce and sell products for human therapeutic
use, mandatory procedures and safety evaluations established by the FDA and
comparable agencies in foreign countries must be followed. The procedure for
seeking and obtaining the required governmental clearances for a new therapeutic
product includes pre-clinical animal testing to determine safety and efficacy,
followed by human clinical testing, and can take many years and require
substantial expenditures. In the case of third-party agreements, APS expects
that the corporate client will fund the testing and the approval process with
guidance from APS. The Company intends to seek the necessary regulatory
approvals for its proprietary dermatology products as they are being developed.
APS' facilities, where the Company manufactures pharmaceutical raw materials,
are subject to periodic governmental inspections. If violations of applicable
regulations are noted during these inspections, significant problems may arise
affecting the continued marketing of any products manufactured by the Company.
The Company's plant in Lafayette, Louisiana operates according to CGMP
prescribed by the FDA. This compliance has entailed modifying certain
manufacturing equipment, as well as implementing certain record keeping and
other practices and procedures which are required of all pharmaceutical
manufacturers. The Company believes it is in compliance with federal and state
laws regarding occupational safety, laboratory practices, environmental
protection and hazardous substance control.
Personal Care Products
Under current regulations, the market introduction of non-medicated cosmetics,
toiletries and skin care products does not require prior formal registration or
approval by the FDA or regulatory agencies in foreign countries, although this
situation could change in the future. The cosmetics industry has established
self-regulating procedures and most companies perform their own toxicity and
consumer tests.
7
<PAGE>
PATENTS AND TRADE SECRETS
As part of the Company's strategy to protect its current products and to provide
a foundation for future products, APS has filed a number of United States patent
applications on inventions relating to specific products, product groups, and
processing technology. The Company also has filed foreign patent applications on
its polymer technology with the European Union, Japan, Australia, South Africa,
Canada, Korea and Taiwan. The Company received U.S. patent protection for its
basic Microsponge system in 1987 and now has a total of 40 issued U.S. patents
and an additional 148 issued foreign patents. The Company has over 68 pending
patent applications worldwide.
Although the Company believes the bases for these patents and patent
applications are sound, they are untested, and there is no assurance that they
will not be successfully challenged. There can be no assurance that any patent
already issued will be of commercial value, or that any patent applications will
result in issued patents of commercial value, or that APS' technology will not
be held to infringe on patents held by others.
APS relies on unpatented trade secrets and know-how to protect certain aspects
of its production technologies. APS' employees, consultants, advisors and
corporate clients have entered into confidentiality agreements with the Company.
These agreements, however, may not necessarily provide meaningful protection for
the Company's trade secrets or proprietary know-how in the event of unauthorized
use or disclosure. In addition, others may obtain access to, or independently
develop, these trade secrets or know-how.
COMPETITION
Although Microsponge and Polytrap systems, by virtue of their highly porous
structure, are unique delivery systems, there are many alternate delivery
systems available. However, in the cosmetic and cosmeceutical fields,
Microsponge and Polytrap systems are particularly versatile at allowing the
entrapment of active agents and controlled release by simple changes in
vehicles.
Other delivery systems based on microparticulate materials could compete with
Microsponge and Polytrap systems. Among these are liposomes, microcapsules and
microspheres. Liposomes are small phospholipid vesicles capable of entrapping
and releasing active agents. However, they are significantly more expensive to
manufacture, less versatile and their stability is a concern. While they are
primarily used in systemic applications, they are also used in the cosmetic
arena.
The most closely related systems are microcapsules and microspheres.
Microcapsules are spherical particles containing an active agent in the core,
surrounded by a polymeric membrane. Microspheres are spherical particles
containing the active agent dispersed in a polymeric matrix. The major
distinguishing feature between Microsponge and Polytrap systems and
microcapsules, or microspheres is that the structure of Microsponge and Polytrap
systems is highly porous, while microspheres or microcapsules are solid
particles with no internal voids.
Thus, while only one type if Microsponge system can be used to entrap a variety
of active agents and release these at desired rates by vehicle changes,
different active agents and different release profiles can only be achieved with
microcapsules or microspheres by a complete change in polymer and fabrication
methods.
HUMAN RESOURCES
As of February 28, 1997, the Company had 84 full-time employees, 3 of whom hold
PhDs. There were 15 employees engaged in research and development, 34 in
manufacturing and production activities, 8 in quality control, and 27 working in
sales, finance, marketing, human resources and administration.
The Company considers its relations with employees to be satisfactory. None of
the Company's employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
8
<PAGE>
Item 2. PROPERTIES
The Company currently occupies 23,040 square feet of laboratory, office and
warehouse space in Redwood City, California and 4,800 square feet of office
space in Greenwich, Connecticut. Rent expense for these facilities in 1996 was
$254,184 and $109,936, respectively.
The Company occupies a production facility and warehouse in Lafayette,
Louisiana, with a current annual capacity, depending upon the application, to
produce 500,000 to 750,000 pounds of entrapped materials. The existing plant,
with contiguous acreage, has been designed to allow significant expansion. In
1995 the Company sold this facility and warehouse along with certain other
assets and subsequently leased them back for a certain fixed monthly rent over a
period of forty-eight months. The Company reported this transaction as a
financing transaction.
The construction of the facility in 1986 was financed primarily by 15-year
tax-exempt industrial development bonds. In 1990, the bonds were refinanced. The
maturity date of the bonds occurs in installments beginning June 30, 1993, and
ending December 31, 2000. The bonds bear a fixed interest rate of 10%. In 1995,
the Company extinguished the bond liability through an "insubstance defeasance"
transaction by placing U.S. government securities in an irrevocable trust to
fund all future interest and principal payments.
The Company's existing research and development and administrative facilities
are not yet being used at full capacity and management believes that such
facilities are adequate and suitable for its current and anticipated needs.
Additional manufacturing capacity could be required as APS expands commercial
production. It is anticipated that any additional production facilities would be
built on land the Company presently occupies in Lafayette, Louisiana.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Shares of the Company's common stock trade on the Nasdaq National Market, under
the symbol APOS. As of February 28, 1997, there were 595 holders of record of
the Company's common stock.
The Company has never paid cash dividends and does not anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. The following table sets forth for the
fiscal periods indicated, the range of high and low closing sales prices for the
Company's common stock on the NASDAQ National Market System.
1996 High Low 1995 High Low
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Quarter 9 1/4 5 1/4 First Quarter 6 4
Second Quarter 11 1/4 7 7/8 Second Quarter 5 7/8 4 1/16
Third Quarter 9 5/8 5 7/8 Third Quarter 8 3/8 5 1/8
Fourth Quarter 8 7/8 6 3/8 Fourth Quarter 7 1/2 4 7/8
9
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except per share data)
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statements of Operations
Total revenues $18,665 $16,108 $15,884 $19,932 $15,527
Research and
development, net 3,506 4,139 6,334 7,343 3,726
Selling, marketing and
advertising 8,455 6,560 5,669 6,237 4,013
General and administrative 2,984 3,082 2,844 2,988 3,468
Loss on purchase commitment,
including related inventory 1,400 600 685 950 -
Net loss (9,378) (9,359) (9,759) (9,877) (5,545)
Loss per common share $ (0.52) $ (0.57) $ (0.65) $ (0.73) $ (0.43)
Weighted average common
shares outstanding 17,987 16,459 15,018 13,527 12,805
December 31 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance Sheets
Working capital $3,800 $4,976 $5,641 $4,555 $14,428
Total assets 18,444 23,082 23,508 24,378 31,115
Long-term debt, excluding
current portion 5,579 6,355 979 3,355 3,672
Shareholders' equity 5,010 5,233 11,786 10,501 20,143
</TABLE>
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
(Dollar amounts are rounded to nearest $1,000)
To the extent that this report discusses financial projections, information or
expectations about our products or markets, or otherwise makes statements about
future events, such statements are forward-looking and are subject to a number
of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from the statements made. These include, among others, uncertainty associated
with timely approval, launch and acceptance of new products, establishment of
new corporate alliances, progress in research and development programs and other
risks listed from time to time in the Company's Securities and Exchange
Commission filings.
The Company's revenues are derived principally from product sales, license fees
and royalties. The Company is currently manufacturing and selling Microsponge(R)
delivery systems for use by customers in almost 100 different cosmetic and
personal care products. Under strategic alliance arrangements entered into with
certain multinational corporations, APS generally receives an initial cash
infusion, future milestone payments, royalties based on third party product
sales and revenues from the supply of Microsponge systems.
As of January 1, 1997, the Company licensed its over the counter consumer
products to the Lander Company in return for royalties on future product sales.
Also as part of its long-term strategic plan to move away from the direct
marketing of consumer products, the Company plans to discontinue the marketing
of its in-licensed suncare products.
Past results are not indicative of future results.
The following tables summarize highlights from the statements of operations
expressed as a percentage change from the prior year and as a percentage of
product revenues.
10
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31, Annual % Change
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS 1996 1995 1994 96/95 95/94
- ----------------------------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- -----
$000 $000 $000
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Product revenues $17,490 $15,203 $14,787 15% 3%
Licensing revenues 1,175 905 1,097 30% -18%
-------- --------- --------
Total revenues 18,665 16,108 15,884 16% 1%
Cost of sales 10,772 11,047 10,149 -2% 9%
Research and development, net 3,506 4,139 6,334 -15% -35%
Selling and marketing 5,405 4,756 4,012 14% 19%
Advertising and promotion 3,050 1,805 1,657 69% 9%
General and administrative 2,984 3,082 2,844 -3% 8%
Loss on purchase commitments, including
related inventory 1,400 600 685 133% -12%
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS 1996 1995 1994
- ----------------------------------- ---- ---- ----
Expenses expressed as a percentage of product revenues:
Cost of sales 62% 73% 69%
Research and development, net 20% 27% 43%
Selling and marketing 31% 31% 27%
Advertising and promotion 17% 12% 11%
General and administrative 17% 20% 19%
Loss on purchase commitments, including
related inventory 8% 4% 5%
</TABLE>
Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
Total revenues for 1996 totalled $18,665,000 compared to $16,108,000 in the
prior year, an increase of $2,557,000 or 16%. Product sales amounted to
$17,490,000, an increase of $2,287,000 or 15% over the prior year, and licensing
revenues amounted to $1,175,000, an increase of $270,000 or 30% over the prior
year. Revenues derived from products which incorporate the Microsponge
technology totalled $11,682,000, an increase of $559,000 or 5% over the prior
year.
The increase in product revenues over 1995 was due primarily to increased
shipments of Microsponge systems to manufacturers of cosmetics and personal care
products of $856,000 or 18% and increased sales of consumer products of
$1,363,000 or 15%. The Company anticipates an increase in sales of Microsponge
systems in 1997 as a result of agreements signed with major corporate customers
who are launching new products during the year. These partners include Ortho
Dermatological, Avon, Medicis, Lander and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products,
Inc. These increases will be offset by the absence of sales of consumer products
due to the licensing of products to the Lander Company effective January 1,
1997, in return for a royalty stream and the Company's plans to discontinue the
marketing of its in-licensed suncare products.
The increase in licensing fee revenue during 1996 relates to the receipt of fees
received from the Company's new corporate partners as part of the agreements
executed in 1996.
Gross profit on product revenues for the year increased by $2,562,000 or 62% to
$6,718,000 due to increased manufacturing efficiencies resulting from the higher
volume and the sales mix of consumer products.
Research and development expense decreased by $633,000 or 15% due primarily to a
change in estimate. Additionally, there was a continuing reduction in outside
services as external costs are being borne principally by corporate partners.
Selling and marketing expense increased by $649,000 or 14% to $5,405,000 due
mainly to an increased focus on opening new markets for Microsponge systems and
increased distribution expense attributable to higher sales volume.
Advertising and promotion expense increased by $1,245,000 or 69% due to a
consumer products sampling program and expenditures relating to a full year's
advertising for the Neet(R) depilatory product line which was licensed from
Reckitt and Colman in September, 1995. These costs, together with selling
expenses, will decrease significantly in 1997 as a result of the licensing
arrangement for the Company's consumer product lines.
General and administrative expense decreased by $98,000 or 3% to $2,984,000 due
mainly to reduced spending on external services.
The loss on purchase commitment relates to a contractual commitment for the
purchase of melanin in excess of
11
<PAGE>
current estimated requirements. Melanin is the key ingredient in the manufacture
of the APS-developed UVA/UVB sun protection cream for which an NDA was filed.
This amount includes the final amount due under the contractual commitment.
The Company's operating loss decreased by $869,000 or 9% to $8,452,000 as a
result of the factors discussed above.
Interest income was essentially flat between 1996 and 1995, but interest expense
increased by $778,000 to $1,223,000 in 1996 as a result of the debt financing
arranged in the second half of 1995.
The net loss for the year of $9,378,000 was essentially flat with the loss in
the prior year, with the increased gross profit being offset by increases in
selling and promotional expense, interest expense and the increased loss on the
purchase commitment.
Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994
Total revenues for 1995 amounted to $16,108,000 compared to $15,884,000 in the
prior year, an increase of $224,000 or 1%. This consisted of product sales of
$15,203,000, an increase of $416,000 or 3% over the prior year, and licensing
revenues of $905,000, a decrease of $192,000 or 18% from the prior year.
Revenues from products which incorporate the Microsponge technology totalled
$10,458,000, an increase of $3,787,000 or 57% over the prior year.
The increase in product revenues over 1994 resulted from increased shipments of
Microsponge systems to a variety of personal care and specialty customers,
primarily manufacturers of cosmetics and toiletries through the alliance with
Dow Corning Corporation. This increase was offset by a slight decrease in sales
of consumer products. While sales of the Exact(R) acne line increased by 71%
over the prior year and the addition of the line of Neet(R) products under a
licensing agreement with Reckitt & Colman also contributed to sales of consumer
products, this was offset by an anticipated decrease in sales of in-licensed
suncare products which do not incorporate the Company's technology.
The decrease in licensing fees was due mainly to the fact that the prior year
included $894,000 of revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion
method on now-completed clinical trials, offset by a milestone payment of
$1,500,000 paid to the Company by Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Corporation upon
the filing of the New Drug Application for Microsponge-enhanced tretinoin acne
cream in February 1995, of which $750,000 was recognized as revenues.
The gross profit on product revenues for the year decreased to 27% from 31% due
to a higher percentage of close-out sales of suncare products, partially offset
by improved gross profit on the supply of Microsponge systems.
Research and development expense decreased significantly from $6,334,000 to
$4,139,000, or by 35%, due to the fact that the prior year included significant
external expenses associated with clinical trials for NDAs which have now been
filed.
Selling and marketing expense increased by $744,000 or 19% to $4,756,000 due
mainly to the Company's investment in the initiation of its ethical
pharmaceutical marketing effort. Advertising and promotion expense increased by
$148,000 or 9% to $1,805,000 largely due to a sampling program related to the
Company's consumer products, the benefits of which should be realized in 1996,
partially offset by reduced spending on print media.
General and administrative expense increased by $238,000 or 8% to $3,082,000 due
mainly to increased spending on a variety of outside services.
The loss on purchase commitment primarily relates to a contractual commitment
for the purchase of melanin in excess of current estimated requirements. Melanin
is the key ingredient in the manufacture of the APS-developed UVA/UVB sun
protection cream for which an NDA was filed in the third quarter of 1994.
Interest income decreased by $38,000 or 11% to $318,000 due mainly to lower
average cash balances. Interest expense increased by $167,000 or 60% to $446,000
due to the debt financing arranged by the Company in the third quarter.
The net loss for the year of $9,359,000 was lower by $400,000 or 4% than the
prior year, with reduced research and development expense being offset by
increased selling and marketing expense and reduced gross profit.
12
<PAGE>
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Total assets as of December 31, 1996 were $18,444,000 compared with $23,082,000
at December 31, 1995. Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 1996 increased
to $5,395,000 from $5,173,000 at December 31, 1995. The Company's primary
investment objectives for those assets are the preservation of capital and the
maintenance of a high degree of liquidity. In the same period, working capital
decreased to $3,800,000 from $4,976,000, primarily due to the discontinuation of
the direct marketing of consumer products which resulted in reduced inventory.
The Company has financed its operations, including product research and
development, from amounts raised in debt and equity financings; the sale of
consumer products, Microsponge delivery systems and Analytical Standard
products; payments received under licensing agreements; and interest earned on
short-term investments.
In prior years, cash was expended on Phase III clinical tests of tretinoin
entrapped in a Microsponge delivery system for the treatment of acne which have
now been completed, and of APS' melanin-Microsponge sun protectant product,
together with related research and development costs. Additionally, the Company
is contractually obligated to purchase minimum annual quantities of melanin. The
final amounts due under the contractual commitment are included in current
liabilities.
In the first quarter of 1996, the Company formed a collaborative agreement with
the Lander Company under which the Company received $2,961,000 in net proceeds
from the sale of 356,761 shares of common stock. In addition, the Company will
receive license fees, royalties on product sales and research and development
funding.
In the second quarter of 1996, the Company entered into an agreement for the
sale of up to $5,000,000 of its common stock and warrants, which can be
initiated at the Company's sole discretion. In May 1996, the Company exercised
its right to sell common stock and warrants totalling $2,000,000 under this
agreement.
During 1996, Company operations used approximately $6,117,000 of cash.
Approximately $3,506,000 was invested in product research and development and
$3,050,000 was invested in advertising and promoting products.
In February 1997, upon receipt of approval from the FDA to market Retin-A(R)
Micro(TM) (tretinoin gel) microsphere for the treatment of acne, APS received
$3,000,000 from J&J as a milestone payment and prepaid royalties.
Also in February 1997, the Company received $653,000 from Lander Company,
representing payment for a third of the assets held for sale pursuant to the
agreement between the two companies. The final two installments are due on March
31 and April 30, 1997.
The Company's existing cash and cash equivalents, collections of trade accounts
receivable, together with interest income and other revenue producing activities
including licensing fees and milestone payments, are expected to be sufficient
to meet the Company's cash requirements for the foreseeable future, assuming no
changes to existing business plans.
13
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $5,394,509 $5,172,809
Accounts receivable less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$47,527 and $68,650 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively 1,666,148 2,436,815
Accrued interest receivable 3,963 16,473
Inventory 2,085,073 7,858,584
Prepaid expenses and other 324,065 985,199
Assets held for sale 2,181,004 --
----------- -----------
Total current assets 11,654,762 16,469,880
Property and equipment, net 4,681,292 5,027,034
Deferred loan costs, net 616,958 832,324
Prepaid license fees, net 165,752 303,638
Goodwill and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $763,424
and $483,668 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively 1,265,801 345,557
Other long-term assets 59,603 103,809
----------- --------------
Total Assets $18,444,168 $23,082,242
=========== =============
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $1,543,143 $3,240,807
Accounts payable, Johnson & Johnson 814,509 4,229,637
Accrued expenses 1,456,512 1,819,541
Accrued melanin purchase commitments 1,800,000 600,000
Current portion - long-term debt 1,490,779 853,987
Deferred revenue 750,000 750,000
----------- ------------
Total current liabilities 7,854,943 11,493,972
Long-term debt 5,578,849 6,354,969
----------- ------------
Total Liabilities 13,433,792 17,848,941
----------- ------------
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, authorized 2,500,000 shares; none issued or
outstanding at December 31, 1996 and 1995 -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 50,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 18,359,744 and 16,594,565 at
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively 183,597 165,946
Common stock to be issued, $.01 par value, 432,101 shares
issuable in 1996 -- 4,321
Warrants, issued and outstanding: 1,431,974 at December 31, 1996
and 1,628,611 at December 31, 1995 2,457,692 2,653,076
Additional paid-in capital 73,950,092 64,600,516
Unrealized gain on securities -- 12,348
Accumulated deficit (71,581,005) (62,202,906)
----------- -------------
Total Shareholders' Equity 5,010,376 5,233,301
----------- -------------
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $18,444,168 $23,082,242
=========== =============
<FN>
See accompanying notes.
</FN>
</TABLE>
14
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Product revenues $17,489,907 $15,203,196 $14,787,048
Licensing revenues 1,175,000 905,000 1,097,402
------------- ------------- -------------
Total revenues 18,664,907 16,108,196 15,884,450
Expenses:
Cost of sales 10,771,766 11,047,399 10,149,302
Research and development, net 3,506,161 4,139,441 6,334,168
Selling and marketing 5,404,774 4,755,788 4,011,752
Advertising and promotion 3,050,180 1,804,540 1,657,178
General and administrative 2,984,213 3,081,900 2,844,282
Loss on purchase commitment, including related inventory 1,400,000 600,000 685,000
------------- ------------- ------------
Operating loss (8,452,187) (9,320,872) (9,797,232)
Interest expense (1,223,303) (445,501) (278,988)
Interest income 322,986 317,948 355,837
Other income (expense), net (25,595) 89,895 (38,593)
------------- ------------- ------------
Net loss $(9,378,099) $(9,358,530) $(9,758,976)
============= ============= ============
Loss per common share $(0.52) $(0.57) $(0.65)
============= ============= ============
Weighted average common shares outstanding 17,987,153 16,459,446 15,017,753
============= ============= ============
<FN>
See accompanying notes.
</FN>
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Common Stock Additional Unrealized
Common Stock Warrants Paid-In Holding
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Gain
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance December 31, 1993 13,646,657 $136,467 1,161,500 $ 2,300,000 $ 51,077,341 $--
Options exercised 471,306 4,713 -- -- 1,881,821 --
Agreement with Johnson &
Johnson, net of $30,201
in offering costs 1,000,000 10,000 200,000 285,000 4,674,799 --
Private placement,
net of $353,183 in
offering costs 925,158 9,251 925,158 1,474,500 2,663,066 --
Unrealized holding gain -- -- -- -- -- 113,166
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
Distributions -- -- -- -- -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994 Total 2,396,464 23,964 1,125,158 1,759,500 9,219,686 113,166
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance December 31, 1994 16,043,121 $160,431 2,286,658 $ 4,059,500 $ 60,297,027 $ 113,166
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options exercised 236,992 2,370 -- -- 1,078,929 --
Private placement,
net of $112,383 in
offering costs 310,278 3,103 310,278 485,591 898,923 --
Securities issued in debt
financing arrangements 4,174 42 193,175 407,985 29,958 --
Common stock to be issued in
connection with the agreement
with Johnson & Johnson 432,101 4,321 -- -- (4,321) --
Warrants expired -- -- (1,161,500) (2,300,000) 2,300,000 --
Change in unrealized holding gain -- -- -- -- -- (100,818)
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 Total 983,545 9,836 (658,047) (1,406,424) 4,303,489 (100,818)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance December 31, 1995 17,026,666 $170,267 1,628,611 $ 2,653,076 $ 64,600,516 $ 12,348
======================================================================================
Options exercised 416,219 4,162 -- -- 1,993,017 --
Shares retired (12,836) (128) -- -- (97,747) --
Private Placement,
net of $62,149 in
offering costs 201,922 2,019 86,538 295,751 1,640,081 --
Common stock to be issued in
connection with the agreement
with Johnson & Johnson (432,101) (4,321) -- -- 4,321 --
Common stock issued in
connection with the agreement
with Johnson & Johnson 432,101 4,321 -- -- (4,321) --
Common stock issued in connection
with the agreement with Lander
Company, net of $39,547 in
offering costs 356,761 3,567 -- -- 2,956,976 --
Common stock issued to Dow Corning,
net of $4,000 in offering costs 200,000 2,000 -- -- 1,194,000 --
Common stock issued to Biosource 94,000 940 -- -- 599,060 --
Securities issued in debt financing
arrangements 10,675 107 4,325 (50,935) 78,353 --
Fair value of stock options
issued to non-employees -- -- -- -- 161,299 --
Warrants exercised 66,337 663 (87,500) (155,200) 539,537 --
Warrants expired -- -- (200,000) (285,000) 285,000 --
Change in unrealized holding gain -- -- -- -- -- (12,348)
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 Total 1,333,078 13,330 (196,637) (195,384) 9,349,576 (12,348)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance December 31, 1996 18,359,744 $183,597 1,431,974 $ 2,457,692 $ 73,950,092 $--
======================================================================================
<FN>
See accompanying notes.
</FN>
</TABLE>
For the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Total
Accumulated Shareholders'
Deficit Equity
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance December 31, 1993 $(43,012,400) $ 10,501,408
Options exercised -- 1,886,534
Agreement with Johnson &
Johnson, net of $30,201
in offering costs -- 4,969,799
Private placement,
net of $353,183 in
offering costs -- 4,146,817
Unrealized holding gain -- 113,166
Net loss (9,758,976) (9,758,976)
Distributions (73,000) (73,000)
------------ ------------
1994 Total (9,831,976) 1,284,340
------------ ------------
Balance December 31, 1994 $(52,844,376) $ 11,785,748
============ ============
Options exercised -- 1,081,299
Private placement,
net of $112,383 in
offering costs -- 1,387,617
Securities issued in debt
financing arrangements -- 437,985
Common stock to be issued in
connection with the agreement
with Johnson & Johnson -- --
Warrants expired -- --
Change in unrealized holding gain -- (100,818)
Net loss (9,358,530) (9,358,530)
------------ ------------
1995 Total (9,358,530) (6,552,447)
------------ ------------
Balance December 31, 1995 $(62,202,906) $ 5,233,301
============ ============
Options exercised -- 1,997,179
Shares retired -- (97,875)
Private Placement,
net of $62,149 in
offering costs -- 1,937,851
Common stock to be issued in
connection with the agreement
with Johnson & Johnson -- --
Common stock issued in
connection with the agreement
with Johnson & Johnson -- --
Common stock issued in connection
with the agreement with Lander
Company, net of $39,547 in
offering costs -- 2,960,543
Common stock issued to Dow Corning
net of $4,000 in offering costs -- 1,196,000
Common stock issued to Biosource -- 600,000
Securities issued in debt financing
arrangements -- 27,525
Fair value of stock options
issued to non-employees -- 161,299
Warrants exercised -- 385,000
Warrants expired -- --
Change in unrealized holding gain -- (12,348)
Net loss (9,378,099) (9,378,099)
------------ ------------
1996 Total (9,378,099) (222,925)
------------ ------------
Balance December 31, 1996 $(71,581,005) $ 5,010,376
============ ============
See accompanying notes.
16
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $(9,378,099) $(9,358,530) $(9,758,976)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,393,805 1,377,614 1,243,906
Provision for loss on purchase commitments, including inventory 1,400,000 600,000 685,000
Change in allowance for doubtful accounts (21,123) 2,086 (69,456)
Accretion of pledged long-term marketable securities -- (121,572) (150,498)
(Gain) loss on sale of equipment and assets held for sale -- 125,764 (868)
Gain on sale of pledged marketable securities -- (234,319) --
Provision for deferred compensation 161,299 -- --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 791,790 (1,130,448) 908,738
Accrued interest receivable 12,510 9,570 6,981
Inventory 5,573,511 (856,558) 1,291,126
Prepaid expenses and other 661,134 20,931 (575,003)
Assets held for sale (2,181,004) -- --
Deferred loan costs 215,366 (439,824) --
Other long-term assets 129,425 (10,856) 17,895
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (1,460,693) 87,394 517,005
Accounts payable, Johnson & Johnson (3,415,128) 659,112 (1,852,753)
Deferred revenue -- 750,000 (894,000)
------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in operating activities (6,117,207) (8,519,636) (8,630,903)
------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment (719,640) (901,288) (645,899)
Proceeds from sale of equipment and assets held for sale -- 797,672 2,290
Purchases of marketable securities (512,513) (4,458,891) (1,448,467)
Maturities and sales of marketable securities 500,165 5,935,087 1,216,394
------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided from (used in) investing activities (731,988) 1,372,580 (875,682)
------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment to Dow Corning -- -- (274,208)
Repayment of long-term debt (870,598) (258,304) (200,000)
Proceeds from long-term debt and warrants 758,795 7,367,259 --
Proceeds from private placements, net of offering costs 1,937,851 1,387,617 4,146,817
Proceeds from stock issued to Lander Company, net of offering costs 2,960,543 -- --
Proceeds from agreement with Johnson & Johnson -- -- 4,969,799
Distributions -- -- (73,000)
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and warrants,
net of common stock retired 2,284,304 1,081,299 1,886,534
------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided from financing activities 7,070,895 9,577,871 10,455,942
------------------------------------------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 221,700 2,430,815 949,357
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 5,172,809 2,741,994 1,792,637
------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $5,394,509 $5,172,809 $2,741,994
================================================
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing transactions:
During the first quarter of 1996, the Company acquired all rights to the
Polytrap technology from Dow Corning Corporation ("DCC") in exchange for
200,000 shares of common stock valued at $1,200,000.
During the first quarter of 1996, the Company paid Biosource for the 1995
purchase commitment totalling $600,000 by issuing 94,000 shares of common
stock.
The Company offset a deposit of approximately $188,000 and $755,000 for 1996
and 1995, respectively, with a creditor against a loan from the same creditor
(Note 8).
In September, 1995, the Company offset its note payable to Dow Corning
Corporation against its receivable from DCC. This resulted in a decrease in
long-term debt, short-term debt and accounts receivable of $478,935, $100,000
and $578,935, respectively.
In 1995, the Company extinguished a debt through an insubstance defeasance
transaction by placing U.S. government securities in an irrevocable trust to
fund all future scheduled payments on the debt.
<FN>
See accompanying notes.
</FN>
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE>
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Note 1 Business
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. ("APS" or the "Company") develops, manufactures
and sells patented delivery systems that allow for the controlled release of
active ingredients which have benefits in the ethical dermatology, cosmetic and
personal care areas. Certain projects are conducted under development and
licensing arrangements with large companies, others are part of joint ventures
in which APS is a major participant, and a number of projects are exclusive to
APS. APS also marketed and distributed a range of consumer products for personal
care through its subsidiary, Premier, Inc. ("Premier"). Effective January 1997,
APS licensed the consumer products to a third party (Note 6).
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the
financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Premier,
Advanced Consumer Products, Inc. ("ACP") and APS Analytical Standards. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities: For purposes of the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows and Consolidated Balance Sheets, the Company considers
all short-term investments that have original maturities of less than three
months to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments consist primarily of
certificates of deposit, commercial paper, master notes and repurchase
agreements. Investments which have original maturities longer than three months
are classified as marketable securities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The Company has classified its investments in certain debt and equity
securities as "available-for-sale". Such investments are recorded at fair value
with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a separate component of
stockholders' equity.
Inventory: Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value, utilizing
the average cost method (Note 5).
Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation
is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets, not exceeding twenty years (Note 7).
Prepaid License Fees: The fee paid to Biosource Technologies, Inc. ("Biosource")
in 1992 is being amortized over a seven-year period consistent with the term of
the agreement (Note 3). Amortization of prepaid license fees totalled $137,880,
$137,868 and $124,057 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Deferred Loan Costs: Deferred charges relate to costs incurred in obtaining
certain loans. These charges are being amortized over the life of the loans
using the effective interest method (Note 8).
Long-Lived Assets, Including Goodwill and Other Intangibles: In accordance with
SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of", the Company evaluates whether changes have
occurred that would require revision of the remaining estimated lives of
recorded long-lived assets, including goodwill, or render those assets not
recoverable. If such circumstances arise, recoverability is determined by
comparing the undiscounted net cash flows of long-lived assets to their
respective carrying values. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based
on the projected discounted cash flows using an appropriate discount rate. At
this time, the Company believes that no significant impairment of long-lived
assets, including goodwill, has occurred and that no reduction of the estimated
useful lives of such assets is warranted.
In the first quarter of 1996, APS acquired all patents and rights to the
Polytrap technology from Dow Corning Corporation in exchange for 200,000 shares
of its common stock. APS recorded intangible assets totalling $1,200,000
relating to this transaction. The intangible assets are being amortized on a
straight line basis over a period of approximately 10 years, which is the
remaining life of the main patent acquired.
In 1992, APS acquired for 157,894 shares of its common stock, the outstanding
25% interest in ACP, APS' over-the-counter consumer products subsidiary. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Excess of cost over net assets
acquired
18
<PAGE>
arising from the purchase is being amortized over five years on a straight-line
basis.
Amortization of intangible assets totalled $279,756, $188,875 and $160,796, in
1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123: Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," encourages, but does not require companies to record compensation
cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has
chosen to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method
prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for "Stock
Issued to Employees" and related interpretations. Accordingly, except for stock
options issued to non-employees, no compensation cost has been recognized for
the Company's fixed stock option plans (Note 10).
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and related notes to financial statements. Changes in such estimates
may affect amounts in future periods.
Advertising and Promotion Costs: Advertising and promotion costs are expensed as
incurred.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share: Earnings (loss) per common share are based on the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. The
computation assumes that no outstanding stock options and warrants were
exercised as they would be anti-dilutive.
Licensing Agreements: The Company has several licensing agreements that
generally provide for monthly payments, periodic minimum payments and royalties
for exclusivity. Revenue is recorded as services are performed. The agreements
do not contain any financial obligations with respect to the Company at the
expiration or earlier termination of the agreements. Certain agreements also
require the remittance of non-refundable license fees.
Deferred Revenue: Prepaid royalties paid to APS by Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical
Corporation ("Ortho"), a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson Inc. ("J&J"), as part
of the retinoid licensing agreement are reported as deferred revenues (Note 13).
Concentrations of Credit Risk: Financial instruments which potentially expose
the Company to concentrations of credit risk, as defined by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 105, consist primarily of trade accounts
receivable. As of December 31, 1996, approximately 53% of the recorded trade
receivables were concentrated with two customers in the cosmetic and personal
care industries. To reduce credit risk, the Company performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers' financial conditions. The Company does not
generally require collateral.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year
financial statements to conform with the presentation in 1996.
Note 3 Related Party Transactions
APS has entered into agreements with Biosource. One director serves on the Board
of Directors of both Biosource and APS. All agreements between APS and Biosource
have been, and will continue to be, considered and approved by a vote of the
disinterested directors. The agreements provide APS worldwide rights to use and
sell Biosource's biologically-synthesized melanin in Microsponge systems for all
sun protection, cosmetic, ethical dermatology and over-the-counter skin care
purposes. In return, APS is required to make annual minimum purchases of
melanin, pay royalties on sales of APS melanin-Microsponge products and was
required to prepay $500,000 of royalties. For estimated losses on purchase
commitments and related inventory, the Company accrued $1,400,000, $600,000 and
$685,000 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. During 1994, the Company paid
Biosource $263,403 for the supply of melanin. All minimum financial commitments
under the current agreements have been expensed by APS.
In 1996, APS paid Biosource the 1995 minimum purchase commitment by issuing
Biosource 94,000 shares of APS common stock.
19
<PAGE>
Note 4 Cash Equivalents
All investments in debt securities have been classified as cash equivalents in
the accompanying balance sheets as they mature in less than three months.
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the amortized cost and estimated market value of
investments in debt securities are set forth in the tables below:
December 31, 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate debt securities $3,556,052 -- -- $3,556,052
Other debt securities 214,790 -- -- 214,790
-------------------------------------------------
Totals $3,770,842 -- -- $3,770,842
=================================================
December 31, 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate debt securities $3,273,602 $12,348 -- $3,285,950
Other debt securities 164,425 -- -- 164,425
-------------------------------------------------
Totals $3,438,027 $12,348 -- $3,450,375
==================================================
Note 5 Inventory
The major components of inventory are as follows: December 31, December 31,
1996 1995
---------------------------
Raw materials and work-in-process $604,852 $1,006,847
Finished goods 1,480,221 6,851,737
---------------------------
Total inventory $2,085,073 $7,858,584
===========================
Consumer products inventory is classified as Assets Held for Sale in the
accompanying December 31, 1996 balance sheet (Note 6). J&J has a security
interest in the Company's Sundown(R) and Johnson's Baby Sunblock(R) inventory.
Inventory subject to their security interest totalled approximately $4,400,000
at December 31, 1995 (Note 14).
Note 6 Assets Held for Sale
As part of the Company's long-term strategic plan to move away from the direct
marketing of consumer products, APS entered into an agreement with Lander
Company under which Lander will commercialize the APS consumer products. Under
the terms of the agreement, certain consumer products inventory, manufacturing
equipment and prepaid advertising credits were sold to Lander in January 1997 at
the December 31, 1996 book value. In addition, APS will receive revenue from
royalties on consumer product sales and the supply of Microsponge systems to
Lander. Also, the Company plans to discontinue the marketing of the suncare
products licensed from J&J; the related inventory, in which J&J has a security
interest, amounted to approximately $198,000 at December 31, 1996. For financial
reporting purposes, these consumer product assets are classified as Assets Held
for Sale in the accompanying balance sheet and consist of the following at
December 31, 1996:
Inventory $1,703,764
Prepaid Asset 388,021
Property Plant and Equipment 89,219
-------------
$2,181,004
=============
20
<PAGE>
Note 7 Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following:
December 31, December 31,
1996 1995
--------------------------------
Building $1,611,039 $1,610,339
Land and improvements 163,519 163,519
Leasehold improvements 571,223 571,223
Furniture and equipment 11,119,307 10,623,203
--------------------------------
Total property and equipment $13,465,088 $12,968,284
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization (8,783,796) (7,941,250)
--------------------------------
Property and equipment, net $4,681,292 $5,027,034
================================
Depreciation expense amounted to $976,163, $980,779 and $920,871 for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, respectively.
Certain consumer products manufacturing equipment is classified as Assets Held
for Sale in the accompanying December 31, 1996 balance sheet (Note 6).
Note 8 Long-Term Debt
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-term debt consists of the following: December 31, December 31,
1996 1995
-----------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Bank loan, interest payable monthly, principal due in non-equal installments
commencing December 1, 1996 through March 1, 1999, secured by the assets and
operating cash flow of a subsidiary of the Company and guaranteed by the Company $2,950,000 $3,000,000
Term loan, subordinated to bank loan, interest payable quarterly, principal due
in non-equal installments commencing December 1, 1996 through March 1, 1999,
secured by the assets and operating cash flows of a subsidiary of the Company
and guaranteed by the Company 1,622,500 1,500,000
Term loan, principal and interest due in equal monthly installments commencing
October 1996 through December 1999, secured by certain real and personal property 2,497,128 2,708,956
-----------------------------
Total $7,069,628 $7,208,956
Less current portion 1,490,779 853,987
-----------------------------
Long-term debt $5,578,849 $6,354,969
=============================
</TABLE>
Maturities of the long-term debt are as follows:
Years ending December 31: Amount
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 $ 1,490,779
1998 2,523,389
1999 3,055,460
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 7,069,628
================================================================================
In 1995, the Company received an aggregate amount of $8,122,334 from three
financing arrangements.
The first financing arrangement was a $3,000,000 bank loan with an interest rate
equal to two percentage points above the
21
<PAGE>
Prime Rate (8.25% as of December 31, 1996). The loan is secured by the assets
and operating cash flows of a subsidiary of the Company and guaranteed by the
Company.
The second financing arrangement was originally a $1,500,000 term loan with a
syndicate of lenders and a fixed interest rate of 14%. In January 1996, an
incremental $150,000 was received under this financing arrangement. The loan is
also secured by the assets and operating cash flows of a subsidiary of the
Company and guaranteed by the Company. The security interest of the debt holders
is subordinated to the bank loan's security interest.
In the third quarter of 1995, the Company consummated a transaction whereby
certain real and personal properties were sold to a third party and subsequently
leased back for a fixed rental stream over a period of forty-eight months. The
Company has the option either to purchase all the properties at the expiration
of the term of the lease or extend the term of the lease. The Company reported
this transaction as a financing transaction since the requirements for
consummation of a sale were not met. A deposit of $188,000 and $755,000 with the
lender was offset against the loan balance as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
respectively. In 1996, the Company received a refund of $567,000 of the deposit
upon satisfaction of certain conditions identified in the financing agreement.
This transaction has been reflected in the table above as a term loan.
The terms of certain financing agreements contain, among other provisions,
requirements for a subsidiary of the Company to maintain defined levels of
earnings, net worth and various financial ratios, including debt to net worth.
In conjunction with the debt financing agreements, APS issued a total of 197,500
warrants with an exercise price of $7.00 per share of common stock.
All costs incurred in obtaining the financing arrangements have been capitalized
as deferred charges, and are being amortized over the life of the loans using
the effective interest method. Interest paid in 1996, 1995 and 1994 approximated
interest expense reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In September 1995, the Company extinguished $2,500,000 of Industrial Revenue
Bonds through an "insubstance defeasance" transaction by placing approximately
$2,500,000 of U.S. government securities in an irrevocable trust to fund all
future interest and principal payments. The purchase of the government
securities was achieved through the sale of the Company's pledged marketable
security. The debt extinguishment did not have a material impact on the
Company's earnings. The debt balance outstanding as of December 31, 1996 was
$2,500,000.
Note 9 Commitments
Lease Commitments: Total rental expense for property and equipment was $655,283,
$639,807 and $558,086 for 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
The Company's future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating
leases for facilities as of December 31, 1996, are as follows:
Minimum
Years Ending December 31, Payments
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 $ 443,442
1998 132,186
1999 100,043
2000 80,869
2001 75,600
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 832,140
===============================================================================
Note 10 Shareholders' Equity
Private Placements and Common Stock Warrants: In 1994, the Company raised
$9,116,616 net of offering costs through two private placements. In the first
private placement, APS issued 1,000,000 shares of newly issued common stock to
Johnson & Johnson ("J&J") in consideration for $5,000,000. In addition, J&J
received 200,000 warrants exercisable for two years at $12.00 per share. In
January 1996, in accordance with the 1994 private placement agreement, APS
issued J&J 432,101 shares of common stock as a result of the APS stock price not
achieving certain
22
<PAGE>
predetermined levels. The 200,000 warrants issued to J&J in conjunction with
this private placement expired in 1996 (Note 13).
The second private placement was pursuant to an agreement for the sale of up to
$8,000,000 of common stock and warrants in six installments beginning in June,
1994 and ending on September 29, 1995. The Company sold $6,000,000 of common
stock and warrants through March 30, 1995. The remaining two optional
installments in June and September 1995 totalling $2,000,000 of common stock and
warrants were not sold by the Company. In accordance with the agreement, the
following shares of common stock and warrants were issued:
Number of shares Number of Exercise Price
Date Issued of Common Stock Issued Warrants Issued of Warrants
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 30, 1994 294,314 294,314 $5.61
September 30, 1994 299,066 299,066 $5.52
December 31, 1994 331,778 331,778 $4.97
March 30, 1995 310,278 310,278 $5.32
The warrants issued are exercisable over a three-year period. The value of the
warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model.
In conjunction with certain debt financing agreements made in 1995 (Note 8), APS
issued a total of 197,500 warrants with an exercise price of $7.00 per share of
common stock. These warrants expire on March 27, 2000.
In the first quarter of 1995, 1,161,500 warrants issued in a 1992 private
placement expired.
In the first quarter of 1996, the Company formed a collaborative agreement with
the Lander Company under which the Company received $2,961,000 in net proceeds
from the sale of 356,761 shares of common stock. In addition, the Company will
receive licensing fees, research and development funding and royalties on
product sales in the future.
In 1996, APS acquired all patents and rights to the Polytrap technology from Dow
Corning in exchange for 200,000 shares of APS common stock (Note 2).
During the second quarter of 1996, APS received $1,937,851 net of offering
costs, through a private placement and sale of 201,922 shares of common stock
and 86,538 warrants exercisable over a three-year period. The warrants are
exercisable at the following prices:
Number of Shares Exercise Price
---------------- --------------
28,846 $7.43
28,846 $9.90
28,846 $12.38
The private placement was pursuant to an agreement for the sale of up to
$5,000,000 of common stock and warrants, which can be initiated at the Company's
sole discretion.
Shareholders Rights Plan: On August 19, 1996, the Board of Directors approved a
Shareholders Rights Plan under which shareholders of record on September 3, 1996
received a dividend of one Preferred Stock purchase right ("Rights") for each
share of common stock outstanding. The Rights are not generally exercisable
until 10 business days after a person or group acquires 20% or more of the
outstanding shares of common stock or announces a tender offer which could
result in a person or group beneficially owning 20% or more of the outstanding
shares of common stock (an "Acquisition") of the Company. Each Right, should it
become exercisable, will entitle the holder (other than acquirer) to purchase
company stock at a discount. The Board of Directors may terminate the Rights
plan or, under certain circumstances, redeem the rights.
In the event of an Acquisition without the approval of the Board, each Right
will entitle the registered holder, other than an acquirer and certain related
parties, to buy at the Right's then current exercise price a number of shares of
common stock with a market value equal to twice the exercise price.
23
<PAGE>
In addition, if at the time when there was a 20% shareholder, the Company were
to be acquired by merger, shareholders with unexercised Rights could purchase
common stock of the acquirer with a value of twice the exercise price of the
Rights.
The Board may redeem the Rights for $0.01 per Right at any time prior to
Acquisition. Unless earlier redeemed, the Rights will expire on August 19, 2006.
Stock Options: The Company has various stock option plans for employees,
officers, directors and consultants. The options are granted at fair market
value and expire no later than ten years from the date of the grant. The options
are exercisable in accordance with vesting schedules that generally provide for
them to be fully exercisable four years after the date of grant.
The Company has adopted the disclosure only provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, ("SFAS No. 123") "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." Accordingly, except for stock options issued to non-employees, no
compensation cost has been recognized for the fixed stock option plans. The
compensation cost that has been charged against income for the stock options
issued to non-employees was $161,000, $0 and $0 for 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. Had compensation cost for the Company's fixed stock option plans
been determined consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company's
net loss and loss per common share would have increased to the pro-forma amounts
indicated below:
1996 1995
---- ----
Net loss - as reported $( 9,378,099) $(9,358,530)
Net loss - pro-forma $(10,462,871) $(9,815,235)
Loss per common share - as reported $ (0.52) $ (0.57)
Loss per common share - pro-forma $ (0.58) $ (0.60)
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions used for grants in 1996 and 1995: dividend yield of 0; expected
volatility of 85%; risk-free interest rate of 6.1 percent; and expected life of
four years for all the stock option plans.
The amounts disclosed above under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123 include
compensation costs and fair values for options granted since January 1, 1995 and
may not be representative of the effects in future years.
<TABLE>
The following table summarizes option activity for 1996, 1995 and 1994:
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Exercise Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at beginning of year 2,972,324 $5.98 2,677,162 $6.14 2,588,940 $6.21
Granted 502,500 $7.89 636,500 $5.31 723,500 $5.13
Exercised (416,219) $4.80 (236,992) $4.59 (471,306) $4.00
Expired or Cancelled (157,165) $6.25 (104,346) $9.14 (163,972) $9.00
--------- --------- ---------
Outstanding at end of year 2,901,440 $6.46 2,972,324 $5.98 2,677,162 $6.14
========= ========= =========
Options exercisable at year-end 1,945,056 1,877,295 1,529,574
Shares available for future grant at
year end 569,984 167,819 709,973
Weighted-average fair value of options
granted during the year $7.89 $5.31 $5.13
</TABLE>
24
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding
at December 31, 1996:
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
Weighted Avg.
Range of Number Remaining Number
Exercise Outstanding Contractual Weighted Avg. Exercisable Weighted Avg.
Prices 12/31/96 Life Exercise Price at 12/31/96 Exercise Price
- ------ ------- ---- -------------- ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$3.44-$5.25 922,760 6.6 years $ 4.65 613,035 $ 4.39
$5.38-$5.75 727,180 7.1 $ 5.45 581,772 $ 5.46
$6.13-$8.13 729,500 8.1 $ 7.15 308,249 $ 6.97
$9.25-$11.13 522,000 5.9 $ 10.11 442,000 $ 10.08
--------- ---------
$3.44-$11.13 2,901,440 7.0 $ 6.46 1,945,056 $ 6.42
</TABLE>
Distributions: Distributions presented in the Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders' Equity represent payments to the shareholders of Premier, which
was a subchapter S Corporation. Premier's S Corporation election was terminated
in conjunction with the merger.
Note 11 Defined Contribution Plan
The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan covering substantially all of
its employees. In 1996 and 1995, the Company made matching contributions equal
to 50% of each participant's contribution during the plan year up to a maximum
amount equal to the lesser of 3% of each participant's annual compensation or
$4,750 and $4,500 for the 1996 and 1995 calendar years, respectively. In 1994
the maximum matching contribution made by the Company was equal to the lesser of
1.5% of each participant's salary or $1,000 per calendar year. The Company may
also contribute additional discretionary amounts as it may determine. For the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company contributed to the
plan approximately $110,000, $89,000 and $55,000, respectively. No discretionary
contributions have been made to the plan since its inception.
Note 12 Income Taxes
A reconciliation of the Federal statutory rate of 34% to the Company's effective
tax rate is as follows:
December 31
1996 1995 1994
-----------------------------------
U.S. Federal statutory rate (benefit) (34.0)% (34.0)% (34.0)%
Net losses without tax benefits 33.75 33.5 34.0
State income taxes, net of U.S.
Federal income tax effect -- -- --
Nondeductible expenses 0.25 0.5 --
----------------------------------
Total tax expense -- -- --
==================================
At December 31, 1996, the Company had net Federal operating loss carryforwards
of approximately $72,500,000 for income tax reporting purposes and California
operating loss carryforwards of approximately $8,400,000. The Federal net
operating loss carryforwards expire beginning in 1998 through the year 2011. The
California net operating loss carryforwards expire beginning in 1997 through the
year 2001. A California net operating loss carryforward from 1989 in the
approximate amount of $2,000,000 expired December 31, 1996.
Due to the "change in ownership" provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986,
approximately $32,000,000 and $5,500,000 of the Company's Federal and California
net operating loss carryforwards, respectively, are subject to an annual
limitation against taxable income. The balance of the Federal and California
loss carryforwards of approximately $40,500,000 and $2,900,000, respectively,
which arose subsequent to the Company's change in ownership will be fully
available to offset taxable income in excess of the annual limitation until
fully utilized or there is another ownership change.
25
<PAGE>
The Company also has investment tax credits and research and experimental tax
credits aggregating approximately $1,692,000 and $673,000 for Federal and
California purposes, respectively. The Federal credit carryforwards expire
beginning in 1998 through the year 2011. The California credits carryover
indefinitely until utilized.
There are also California credit carryforwards for qualified manufacturing and
research and development equipment of approximately $11,000; these credits
expire beginning in 2005 through the year 2006.
<TABLE>
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions
of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 1996 and
1995 are presented below:
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---- -----
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred research expenditures $1,445,000 $1,443,000
Accruals and reserves not currently deductible
for tax purposes 1,771,000 1,197,000
Net operating loss carryforwards 25,407,000 22,283,000
Credit carryforwards 2,377,000 2,274,000
Other 406,000 572,000
-------------- --------------
Gross deferred tax assets 31,406,000 27,769,000
Less valuation allowance (31,182,000) (27,426,000)
-------------- --------------
Total deferred tax assets $224,000 $343,000
-------------- --------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment $(224,000) $(343,000)
-------------- --------------
Total deferred tax liabilities (224,000) (343,000)
-------------- --------------
Net deferred taxes $ -- $ --
============== ==============
</TABLE>
The net change in the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994 was an increase of approximately $3,756,000, $4,534,000 and
$3,627,000, respectively. Management believes that sufficient uncertainty exists
regarding the realizability of these items and, accordingly, a valuation
allowance is required.
Gross deferred tax assets as of December 31, 1996 include approximately
$2,594,000 relating to the exercise of stock options, for which any related tax
benefits will be credited to equity when realized.
Note 13 Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Corporation
In May 1992, APS entered into development, and licensing and investment
agreements with Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Corporation ("Ortho") for the
development of retinoid products. The first product is a Microsponge system
entrapment of tretinoin (trans-retinoic acid or "t-RA"), a prescription acne
drug for which FDA approval was received in February 1997. A second product
licensed to Ortho is a Microsponge entrapment of a retinoid to be used for the
treatment of photodamaged skin.
The terms of the agreements included an $8,000,000 investment in APS for 723,006
newly issued shares of APS common stock and the payment to APS of $6,000,000 in
licensing fees by J&J. The licensing fees were recognized as revenues according
to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting whereby income was
recognized based on the estimated stage of completion of the related project.
Cash payments received in advance of being earned were classified as deferred
revenue. Revisions of estimated profits were included in earnings by the
reallocation method which spread the change in estimate over the current and
future periods. As of December 31, 1994, the project had been completed and all
associated revenues had been recognized.
J&J made a second equity investment in the Company in May 1994. Under this
agreement, J&J purchased 1,000,000 shares of newly issued common stock in
consideration for $5,000,000. In January 1996, APS issued J&J 432,101 shares of
common stock as a result of the APS stock price not achieving certain
predetermined levels. The 200,000 warrants issued in 1994 to J&J in conjunction
with this equity investment expired in 1996. As of December 31, 1996, J&J owns
approximately 12% of the APS common shares outstanding.
In February 1995, APS received $750,000 in prepaid royalties and an additional
$750,000 as a milestone payment on the submission to the FDA of its New Drug
Application for the tretinoin prescription acne treatment. The milestone payment
26
<PAGE>
was recognized as revenue upon receipt. The prepaid royalties of $750,000 were
recorded as deferred revenues. In February 1997, upon receipt of approval from
the FDA to market Retin-A(R) Micro(TM) (tretinoin gel) microsphere for the
treatment of acne, APS received $3,000,000 from Ortho of which one half is a
milestone payment which will be recognized as revenue in 1997 and half is
prepaid royalties which will be recorded as deferred revenues. APS will earn a
mark-up on Microsponge systems supplied to Ortho and Ortho will pay APS a
royalty on product sales, subject to certain minimums. Should these minimums not
be achieved, Ortho would lose its exclusivity and APS would regain marketing
rights to the retinoid products. APS has the ability to earn an additional
$4,750,000 in fees if certain research milestones are achieved.
Note 14 Johnson & Johnson
Licensing Agreement: The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Premier, licensed
from J&J the exclusive right to manufacture and distribute a product, Take-Off,
in the U.S. The agreement provided for Premier to remit royalty payments to J&J
based on net sales, with minimum payments of $375,000 per year. In December
1996, the Company purchased the rights to Take-Off from J&J for a 3% royalty on
net sales for the five year period ending December 31, 2001. In January 1997, as
part of its long-term strategic plan to move away from the marketing of consumer
products, the Company sub-licensed the right to manufacture and distribute
Take-Off to Lander Company.
Distribution Arrangement: Premier obtained the rights to market and distribute
two suncare products, Sundown and Johnson's Baby Sunblock, in the U.S. Premier &
J&J share the profits or losses on sales of suncare products. Premier performs a
reconciliation of the payable to J&J annually to determine the portion that is
currently due. The portion of the payable that relates to inventory sold during
a contract year is due at the end of that contract year, which begins on January
1 and ends on December 31.
As part of the Company's long-term strategic plan to move away from the direct
marketing of consumer products, this distribution arrangement with J&J will be
terminated in 1997. The remaining inventory on hand as of December 31, 1996 will
be sold in 1997.
27
<PAGE>
Independent Auditors' Report
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Advanced Polymer
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996. In
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also
have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in Item 14(a)2. These
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Advanced Polymer
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Francisco, California
March 5, 1997
28
<PAGE>
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Part III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
APS incorporates by reference the information set forth under the
captions "Nomination and Election of Directors" and "Executive Compensation" of
the Company's Proxy Statement (the "Proxy Statement") for the annual meeting of
shareholders to be held on June 4, 1997.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
APS incorporates by reference the information set forth under the caption
"Executive Compensation" of the Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The Company incorporates by reference the information set forth under the
caption "Beneficial Stock Ownership" of the Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The Company incorporates by reference the information set forth under the
caption "Certain Transactions" of the Proxy Statement.
29
<PAGE>
Part IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements
The financial statements and supplementary data set forth on
pages 14-27 of Part II of the 10-K Annual Report are
incorporated herein by reference.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II Valuation Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted because the information is not
required or is not so material as to require submission of the
schedule, or because the information is included in the financial
statements or the notes thereto.
3. Exhibits
3-A -Copy of Registrant's Certificate of Incorporation. (1)
3-B -Copy of Registrant's Bylaws. (1)
10-B -Lease Agreement between the Registrant and White Properties
Joint Venture for lease of Registrant's executive offices
in Redwood City, dated as of August 1, 1992. (3)
10-C -Registrant's 1992 Stock Plan dated August 11, 1992. (2)*
10-N -Agreement with Johnson & Johnson dated April 14, 1992. (3)
10-P -Warrant to Purchase Common Stock. (5)
10-S -Lease Agreement between Registrant and Financing for
Science International dated September 1, 1995 (6)
10-T -Security and Loan Agreement between Registrant and Venture
Lending dated September 27, 1995 (6)
10-U -Asset Purchase Agreement with Dow Corning Corporation dated
January 23, 1996 (7)
10-V -Investment Agreement between Registrant and the Lander
Company. (8)
10-W -License, Assignment and Supply Agreement between Registrant
and Lander Company.
21 -Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. (4)
23 -Consent of Independent Auditors.
27 -Financial Data Schedules
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The Company hereby files as part of this Form 10-K the exhibits
listed in Item 14(a)3. As set forth above.
(d) Financial Statement Schedules
See Item 14(a)2. of this Form 10-K.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-15429) and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as Exhibit No. 28.1 to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33- 50640), and
incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992, and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) To be filed supplementally.
(5) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3
and 4.4 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration No.33-82562) and incorporated herein by
reference.
(6) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 1995.
(7) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Deccember 31, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 1996, and incorporated herein by
reference.
* Management Contract or Compensatory plans.
30
<PAGE>
For purposes of complying with the amendments to the rules governing
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (effective July 13, 1990) under the
Securities Act of 1933 ("the Act"), as amended, the undersigned registrant
hereby undertakes as follows, which undertaking shall be incorporated by
reference into Part II of the registrant's Registration Statements on Form S-8
Nos. 33-18942, 33-21829, 33-29084 and 33-50640 filed on December 8, 1987, May
13, 1988, June 6, 1989 and August 11, 1992, respectively.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.
31
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.
By: /S/John J. Meakem, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
John J. Meakem, Jr.
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE>
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed by the following person in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
/S/ John J. Meakem, Jr. Chairman, President,
- --------------------------- Chief Executive Officer March 28, 1997
John J. Meakem, Jr. ---------------
/S/ Michael O'Connell Executive Vice President, Chief
- --------------------------- Administrative Officer and
Michael O'Connell Chief Financial Officer March 28, 1997
--------------
/S/ Carl Ehmann Director March 28, 1997
- --------------------------- --------------
Carl Ehmann
/S/ Jorge Heller Director March 28, 1997
- --------------------------- --------------
Jorge Heller
/S/ Peter Riepenhausen Director March 28, 1997
- --------------------------- --------------
Peter Riepenhausen
/S/ Toby Rosenblatt Director March 28, 1997
- --------------------------- --------------
Toby Rosenblatt
/S/ Gregory H. Turnbull Director March 28, 1997
- --------------------------- --------------
Gregory H. Turnbull
/S/ C. Anthony Wainwright Director March 28, 1997
- --------------------------- --------------
C. Anthony Wainwright
/S/ Dennis Winger Director March 28, 1997
- --------------------------- --------------
Dennis Winger
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE>
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.
<TABLE>
Schedule II
<CAPTION>
Valuation Accounts
Additions
Beginning Charged to Ending
Balance Expense Deductions Balance
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1994
Accounts receivable, allowance
for doubtful accounts $136,020 $5,833 $75,289 $66,564
December 31, 1995
Accounts receivable, allowance
for doubtful accounts $66,564 $29,464 $27,378 $68,650
December 31, 1996
Accounts receivable, allowance
for doubtful accounts $68,650 $9,331 $30,454 $47,527
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc.:
We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-18942, 33-21829, 33-29084 and 33-50640) on Forms S-8 of Advanced Polymer
Systems, Inc. and in the Registration Statements (Nos. 33-47399, 33-51326,
33-82562, 33-88972 and 333-759) on Forms S-3 of Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc.
of our report dated March 5, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1996, and the related schedule, which report appears in the
December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Francisco, California
March 26, 1997
34
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
Form 10-K Annual Report
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.
3-A -Copy of Registrant's Certificate of Incorporation. (1)
3-B -Copy of Registrant's Bylaws. (1)
10-B -Lease Agreement between the Registrant a nd White Properties
Joint Venture for lease of Registrant's executive offices in
Redwood City, dated as of August 1, 1992. (3)
10-C -Registrant's 1992 Stock Plan dated August 11, 1992. (2)*
10-N -Agreement with Johnson & Johnson dated April 14, 1992. (3)
10-P -Warrant to Purchase Common Stock. (5)
10-S -Lease Agreement between Registrant and Financing for Science
International dated September 1, 1995 (6)
10-T -Security and Loan Agreement between Registrant and Venture
Lending dated September 27, 1995 (6)
10-U -Asset Purchase Agreement with Dow Corning Corporation dated
January 23, 1996. (7)
10-V -Investment Agreement between Registrant and Lander Company.
(8)
10-W -License, Assignment and Supply Agreement between Registrant
and Lander Company.
21 -Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. (4)
23 -Consent of Independent Auditors.
27 -Financial Data Schedules
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-15429) and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as Exhibit No. 28.1 to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-50640), and
incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992, and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) To be filed supplementally.
(5) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3
and 4.4 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration No.33-82562) and incorporated herein by
reference.
(6) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 1995, and incorporated herein by
reference.
(7) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 1996, and incorporated herein by
reference.
* Management Contract or Compensatory plans.
Exhibit 10W
LICENSE, ASSIGNMENT AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT effective January 1, 1997, by and between PREMIER CONSUMER
PRODUCTS, INC. ("PCP") and ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC. ("SYSTEMS") and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, PREMIER, INC. ("PREMIER"), (PREMIER and SYSTEMS are
hereafter collectively referred to as "APS").
RECITAL
A. APS is the owner of or possesses a license to the right in the
Territory to make, use and sell in all fields the ExAct(R), Every Step(R),
Neet(R) and Take-Off(R) Products (the "Licensed Products"), subject to certain
obligations.
B. APS is the owner of the Microsponge(R) System technology which is
useful in the development of consumer products.
C. PCP desires to obtain the right to manufacture, use, market and sell
the Licensed Products, and APS is willing to grant to PCP such right on the
terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED as follows:
1. Definitions.
The terms defined in this Article 1 shall, for all purposes of this
Agreement, have the following meanings:
"Affiliate" shall mean any corporation or other entity that directly, or
indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is
under common control with the designated party but only for so long as such
relationship exists. For the purposes of this section, "Control" shall mean
<PAGE>
ownership of at least fifty percent (or such lesser percent as may be the
maximum that may be owned by foreign interests pursuant to the laws of the
country of incorporation) of the shares of stock entitled to vote for directors
in the case of a corporation and at least fifty percent (or such lesser percent
as may be the maximum that may be owned by foreign interests pursuant to the
laws of the country of domicile) of the interests in profits in the case of a
business entity other than a corporation.
"Effective Date" shall mean January 1, 1997.
"ExAct Products" shall mean the acne treatment products currently sold
by APS under the ExAct trademark and any and all improvements to the Microsponge
System, Patent Rights or Know-How included therein that are made by or on behalf
of APS or PCP prior to December 31, 2003.
"Every Step Product" shall mean the foot powder product currently sold
by APS under the Every Step trademark and any and all improvements in the
Microsponge System, Patent Rights or Know-How included therein that are made by
or on behalf of APS or PCP prior to December 31, 2003.
"Know-How" shall mean all inventions, discoveries, trade secrets, and
information, whether or not patented or patentable, together with all data,
formulas, procedures and results, and improvements thereon, now or hereafter
developed or acquired prior to December 31, 2003, by or on behalf of APS or PCP
and proprietary or licensed with right to sublicense to APS, which relate to or
are used in conjunction with the development,
-2-
<PAGE>
manufacture or use of the Microsponge System and Licensed Products.
"Licensed Products" shall mean the ExAct, Every Step, Neet and Take-Off
Products.
"Manufacturing Equipment and Tooling" means the manufacturing equipment
and tooling listed on Schedule I, which schedule shall not include any
Microsponge System manufacturing equipment or tooling.
"Microsponge System" shall mean a delivery system comprising highly
cross-linked copolymer beads with a mean particle size between 15 and 30 microns
and a loading capacity between 40 and 50 percent, having a network of pores and
capable of containment and release as exemplified in U.S. Patents No. 4,690,825
and No. 5,145,675 and any and all improvements thereof.
"Neet Agreement" shall mean the Trademark License and Product
Development Agreement dated August 31, 1995, by and between Reckitt & Colman
(Overseas) and Reckitt & Colman SA as the first party and PREMIER and SYSTEMS as
the second party, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement.
"Neet Products" shall mean the cosmetic depilatory products included in
"Licensed Products" as defined in the Neet Agreement.
"Net Sales" shall mean amounts invoiced on sales of a Licensed Product
or any other product described in Section 4.3 and subject to royalties
thereunder by PCP, its Affiliates, sublicensees and permitted assigns to
independent, unrelated third parties in bona fide arms-length transactions, less
the following deductions actually allowed and taken by such third
-3-
<PAGE>
parties and not otherwise recovered by or reimbursed to PCP, its Affiliates, or
permitted assigns: (i) cash and quantity discounts in such amounts as are
customary in the trade to the extent deducted from the invoiced price and set
forth separately in the invoice; (ii) taxes on sales (such as sales or use
taxes) to the extent added to the sales price and set forth separately as such
in the total amount invoiced; (iii) value added taxes when included as part of
the sales price and not refunded to tie payor; (iv) freight, insurance, and
other transportation charges to the extent added to the sales price and set
forth separately as such in the total amount invoiced; and (v) amounts repaid or
credited by reason of rejections, defects or returns. Net Sales shall not
include sales of a Licensed Product between or among PCP, its Affiliates,
sublicensees and permitted assigns.
"Patent Rights" shall mean any and all patent application or issued
patent relating to the Microsponge System or to the Licensed Products or to
methods for making or using such System or Licensed Product, which rights are
owned or acquired by or licensed to APS and which are filed or have issued prior
to or during the term of this Agreement in the United States or any foreign
country or territory thereof, including any and all additions, continuations,
continuations-in-part, or division thereof or any substitute application
thereof, any reissue or extension of any such patent, and any confirmation
patent or registration patent or patent of addition based on any such patent.
All United States patents and patent applications and all foreign patents and
applications currently within this
-4-
<PAGE>
paragraph and applicable to this Agreement are set forth in Exhibit B, which
Exhibit shall be amended as necessary to reflect changes or additions to the APS
Patent Rights.
"Supply Agreement" shall mean the Supply Agreement referred to in
Article 7 for the supply of this Microsponge System containing an active
ingredient by APS to PCP, its Affiliates, sublicensees, and assigns.
"Take-Off Products" shall mean disposable cloths integrated with a
cleanser and primarily intended for removing make-up that have been formulated
by APS and are currently sold by APS under the Take-Off trademark and any and
all improvements to the Microsponge System, Patent Rights or Know-How included
therein made by or on behalf of APS or PCP prior to December 31, 2003.
"Territory" shall mean the United States and its possessions and Canada
in the case of the ExAct and Every Step Products and the United States in the
case of the Take-off and Neet Products.
2. Disclosure of Information.
2.1 Upon execution of this Agreement and thereafter during the
term hereof, each party shall disclose to the other, in confidence under the
terms of Article 3 hereof, relevant technical information as the same shall
become available, including information relating to the safety of the
Microsponge System and any active ingredient incorporated therein to the extent
necessary or useful to develop or manufacture a Licensed Product. APS shall, at
the request of PCP and on a confidential basis subject to Article 3, allow PCP's
personnel to visit its manufacturing and research facilities and to consult with
its
-5-
<PAGE>
personnel, at mutually agreeable times, to discuss and review the technical
information. All technical information heretofore or hereafter disclosed by APS
to PCP relating to a Licensed Product shall be deemed to have been disclosed
pursuant to this Agreement including, but not limited to, Article 3 hereof.
3. Confidentiality. Except as specifically authorized by this Agreement,
each party shall, for the term of this Agreement and for five years after its
expiration or termination, keep confidential, not disclose to others and use
only for the purposes authorized herein all technical information provided by
the other under this Agreement; provided, however, that the foregoing
obligations of confidentiality shall not apply to the extent that any
information is (i) already known to the recipient at the time of disclosure as
evidenced by its prior written records; (ii) published or publicly known prior
to or after disclosure other than through unauthorized acts or omissions of the
recipient; (iii) disclosed in good faith to the recipient by a third party
entitled to make such disclosure; or (iv) independently developed by or on
behalf of the recipient without recourse to the disclosure herein as documented
in writing. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, the recipient may disclose
information to governmental agencies as required by law, and to vendors having a
need to know and as may be necessary for the recipient to perform its
obligations hereunder and to actual and prospective acquirors of substantially
all of a party's business of which this Agreement is a part, but only if such
disclosure to vendors and prospective acquirors, including an APS
-6-
<PAGE>
toll manufacturer provided by APS pursuant to Section 7.3, is in accordance with
a written agreement imposing essentially the same obligation of confidentiality
on such party as is imposed upon the recipient hereunder.
4. Product and Trademark Licenses; Royalties.
4.1 APS hereby grants to PCP a license to make, have made, use
and sell under the Patent Rights and Know-How (i) the ExAct and Every Step
Products and respective trademarks in the United States and its possessions and
Canada under their respective trademarks and (ii) the Take-Off Products under
the Take-Off trademark in the United States; excluding, however, the Microsponge
System included in any such Product which shall be separately supplied by APS to
PCP and as to which the right to make and have made is specifically not licensed
to PCP pursuant to this Section 4.1.
4.2 APS hereby assigns to PCP all of its rights under the Neet
Agreement, including the right to make, have made, use and sell the Neet Product
under the Neet trademark in the United States pursuant to the Neet Agreement.
4.3 Notwithstanding Sections 4.1 and 4.2 above, PCP may use the
Every Step, ExAct, Neet (subject to the Neet Agreement) and/or Take-Off
trademarks in connection with the sale of other products in the respective
Territories in consideration of the payment of an earned royalty on Net Sales of
any such other product as set forth in Section 4.6 through 4.10 hereof.
4.4 The licenses set forth in Section 4.1 shall include the right
to grant sublicensees and shall be exclusive in
-7-
<PAGE>
all fields of distribution in the respective Territories, provided,
nevertheless, that APS may grant licenses in the applicable Territory to the
ExAct Products but not to the ExAct trademark (i) to one other company such as
Mary Kay for distribution in the market serviced by a distribution system
utilizing representatives selling products directly to the general public, and
(ii) to other companies that promote the ExAct Products primarily through
doctors and other medical professionals. Any such licenses by APS other than to
PCP shall be subject to the condition that PCP shall have the first right of
negotiation to manufacture the Product (but not the Microsponge System) for APS
to supply the other licensees. Except as set forth in this Section 4.4, APS
agrees that during the term of this Agreement it will not license or make
available to any third party any rights in the Territory to make (other than to
a subcontractor of APS), use or sell a Microsponge System containing benzoyl
peroxide in or for use in a product for treatment of acne.
4.5 If PCP's manufacturing rights become effective pursuant to
Section 7.3 hereof, APS also hereby grants to PCP, and consents to PCP having, a
license in its Territories, with the right to grant sublicenses, under APS
Patent Rights and Know-How to make and have made the Microsponge System for
inclusion only in a Licensed Product sold under the licensed trademark for such
Product.
4.6 In consideration for the licenses granted, and that may be
granted for no additional royalty or consideration
-8-
<PAGE>
other than as set forth below in this Section 4.6, PCP will (i) pay to APS an
earned royalty of ten percent of Net Sales of each Licensed Product other than
the Neet Product and each other product described in Section 4.3 hereof and an
earned royalty of seven percent of Net Sales of the Neet Product for a period of
seven years from the Effective Date, provided, that the total cumulative
royalties payable by PCP to APS on cumulative Net Sales as of the end of each
twelve-month period beginning on the Effective Date shall be not less than the
amounts set forth on Schedule II and provided, further, that if there should be
an underpayment of minimum royalties in any twelve-month period, it may be made
up by royalty-bearing Net Sales in the succeeding twelve-month period to the
extent that such Net Sales exceed the level of Net Sales required to make the
minimum royalty payment applicable to such succeeding twelve-month period, and,
if not so made up, payment of the shortfall in royalties for the earlier
twelve-month period shall be made with the first quarterly report after the end
of the succeeding twelve-month period; and (ii) assume and timely perform all
the obligations of PREMIER under the Neet Agreement accruing after the Effective
Date, including but not limited to the payment of royalties under Article 6 of
said agreement.
4.7 Earned royalty payments under section 4.6 shall be made
within 45 days following the end of each calendar quarter, and each payment
shall include royalties which shall have accrued during said calendar quarter.
Such quarterly payments shall be accompanied by a report setting forth
separately the Net Sales of
-9-
<PAGE>
each Licensed Product sold during said calendar quarter in each country and the
calculation of royalties payable for such calendar quarter. In addition, any
underpayment of the minimum royalties set forth on Schedule II and not
subsequently made up as set forth above shall be paid with the report for the
last quarter of the twelve-month period following the twelve-month period in
which the shortfall occurred.
4.8 The remittance of royalties payable on Net Sales outside the
United States shall be made to APS to the extent permitted by law in United
States dollars at the free market rate of exchange of the currency, as published
in the most recent issue of the Wall Street Journal, of the country from which
the royalties are payable on the particular date the particular United States
dollars are transmitted for payment as royalties, less any withholding or
transfer taxes which are applicable. PCP shall supply APS with proof of payment
of such taxes deducted from the royalties payable to APS and paid on APS'
behalf.
4.9 If the transfer or the conversion of all or a part of the
remittance into the United States dollar equivalent in any such instance is not
lawful or possible, the payment of such part of the royalties shall be made by
the deposit thereof, in the currency of the country where the sale on which the
royalty was based was made, to the credit and account of APS or its nominee in
any commercial bank or trust company of APS' choice located in that country.
Notification of such choice of bank or trust company shall be given to PCP at
least thirty days prior to the date that any payment is due. Prompt notice of
deposits by PCP
-10-
<PAGE>
shall be given to APS. APS also agrees that any tax burden levied by any country
on payments due or made by PCP to APS under this Agreement shall be borne by
APS.
4.10 PCP and its Affiliates, licensees and permitted assigns
shall keep and maintain records of Net Sales. Such records shall be open to
inspection at any mutually agreeable time during normal business hours within
two years after the royalty period to which such records relate by an
independent certified public accountant (or the equivalent in countries other
than the United States) reasonably acceptable to PCP but selected by APS. Said
accountant shall have the right to examine the records kept pursuant to this
Agreement and report findings of said examination of records to APS only insofar
as it is necessary to evidence any error on the part of PCP. This right of
inspection shall be exercised only once with respect to each country of sale for
any calendar year. The cost of such inspection shall be borne by APS unless the
result of such examination is the determination that Net Sales in a particular
country have been understated by at least three percent for any calendar year in
which event PCP shall bear the reasonable cost of such inspection for such
country.
5. Assignments; Returns.
5.1 APS hereby assigns, transfers and sells to PCP all of its
right, title and interest to:
(a) All ExAct, Every Step, Take-Off and Neet raw
material, work-in-process, finished product and packaging inventories to be
listed on Schedule III promptly after
-11-
<PAGE>
December 31, 1996, that are owned by APS and have a shelf life of at least
twelve months on the Effective Date, which inventories shall not include any
Microsponge System inventories.
(b) The Manufacturing Equipment and Tooling.
(c) All prepayments and credits for advertising and
promotional materials.
(d) All of APS' rights to use the name "Premier, Inc." as
a corporate name, and as part of this Agreement APS agrees to change the name of
"Premier, Inc." forthwith upon the closing.
5.2 In consideration of the assignments and transfers made by APS
pursuant to Section 5.1, PCP agrees to pay to APS, in three equal installments
on January 31, 1997, March 31, 1997, and April 30, 1997, the book value of the
inventories, Machinery Equipment and Tooling and prepayments and credits for
advertising and promotional materials so assigned and transferred, as shown on
the books of APS maintained in accordance with generally-accepted accounting
principles consistently applied, including write-offs and write-downs of
obsolete and unmarketable inventories and other materials.
5.3 Without limitation of any other rights PCP may have
hereunder, APS agrees that if any Licensed Products are returned to PCP (i)
which were sold by or for the account of APS prior to January 1, 1997 or (ii) as
a result of a manufacturing or packaging defect existing when shipped from the
APS warehouse, APS shall reimburse PCP in an amount equal to the payment or
credit that PCP provides in respect of such returned Licensed
-12-
<PAGE>
Products; provided, however, that in no case shall the amount of APS'
reimbursement obligation hereunder exceed the sum of the invoice price of such
returned Licensed Products plus reasonable costs associated with their return;
and provided further that PCP shall use commercially reasonable efforts to
resolve disputes with customers so as to minimize the amount and frequency of
such returns. The amount to be reimbursed to PCP will be adjusted for all
saleable finished Products which can be taken into inventory and valued in
accordance with the prices set forth in Schedule III hereto.
6. PCP Purchase Option.
6.1 PCP shall have the exclusive option to purchase from APS all
rights to make, have made, use and sell the Licensed Products (but not any
Microsponge System included therein) and to the ExAct, Every Step and Take-Off
trademarks in the Territories on December 31, 2003, by (i) payment to APS on
December 31, 2003, of the excess, if any, of $7,000,000 over the total royalties
paid by PCP to APS with respect to Net Sales (including minimum royalty
payments) from the Effective Date through December 31, 2003, and (ii) PCP's
agreement to pay to APS royalties as set forth in Section 4.6 on Net Sales of
the Licensed Products and other products described in Section 4.3 hereof for an
additional three years through December 31, 2006.
6.2 PCP shall exercise the foregoing option by giving notice in
writing to APS of its decision to do so not later than June 30, 2003. In the
event PCP exercises the foregoing option, the parties shall enter into an asset
purchase agreement
-13-
<PAGE>
containing seller representations, covenants and warranties equivalent to those
contained in Article 12 hereof.
6.3 In the event that PCP does not exercise the foregoing option,
(i) all of the licenses granted to PCP by APS under this Agreement shall
terminate on December 31, 2003 and all such rights shall revert to APS and (ii)
effective on such date PCP shall reassign to APS the right to make, have made,
use and sell the Neet Product under the Neet trademark in the United States
pursuant to the Neet Agreement.
7. Manufacture and Supply.
7.1 APS agrees to manufacture and supply to PCP, its Affiliates,
sublicensees and any permitted assignee, and PCP, its Affiliates, sublicensees
and any permitted assignee shall purchase from APS, their entire Microsponge
System requirements for inclusion in Licensed Products including Licensed
Products as to which PCP has purchased the rights pursuant to Section 6 above.
Manufacturing by APS will be conducted to conform with good manufacturing
practices as may be required from time to time by governmental regulations. It
is intended that the items to be supplied shall be limited to Microsponge
Systems shipped in bulk, unless otherwise requested by PCP for good business
reasons and within the reasonable capabilities of APS.
7.2 The parties shall enter into one or more appropriate Supply
Agreements covering the manufacture and supply of Microsponge Systems for
incorporation in Licensed Products. Each Supply Agreement shall include warranty
of merchantability or fitness for use, appropriate provisions relating to price,
-14-
<PAGE>
minimum purchase requirements, specifications, record keeping, term, compliance
with specifications and applicable governmental requirements, rights to audit
and review cost, quality assurance procedures including optional on-site
inspections, aid and assistance to PCP to set up its own manufacturing facility
(either within or outside the United States) if permitted, provisions for
reasonable notice to APS of supply requirements, and other appropriate terms for
agreements of this type. With respect to price, APS will sell all items at no
greater than 100 percent of its fully burdened cost of manufacture, calculated
on the basis of manufacturing operations at 80 percent capacity and in
accordance with generally-accepted accounting principles and other supply
agreements between APS and PCP. Such agreement shall provide for the continuing
purchase and supply of all of PCP'S, its Affiliates', sublicensees' and
permitted assignees' requirements of such items. Each Supply Agreement shall be
negotiated in an atmosphere of good faith and reasonableness.
7.3 If APS is unable or shall otherwise fail to supply all of
PCP's and its Affiliates', sublicensees' and permitted assignees' requirements
of a particular Microsponge System as contemplated in the Supply Agreement
described in Section 7.2 above, APS shall use its best efforts to provide for
supply from third parties capable of supplying such items. Any such third party
shall be a toll manufacturer who has agreed to essentially the same obligations
of confidentiality as provided in Section 3 hereof. Such third parties shall
demonstrate to PCP's satisfaction that they can supply PCP and its Affiliates',
and
-15-
<PAGE>
permitted assignees' requirements for such Microsponge Systems for a continuous
period of 90 days. The 180-day period referred to below shall commence only
after such third parties shall fail to supply PCP's and its Affiliates' and
permitted assignees' requirements after such 90-day period. In the event of APS
supplying such items from such third parties, APS shall cause such items to be
supplied to PCP at a price not to exceed 100 percent of APS' fully burdened cost
of manufacture in its own manufacturing facility, calculated on the basis of
manufacturing at 80 percent of capacity and in accordance with generally-
accepted accounting principles. APS hereby grants to PCP, effective upon such
failure continuing for 180 days, and PCP shall thereafter have a license under
APS Patent Rights and Know-How to manufacture, or have manufactured, the
particular Microsponge System. Such right and license shall continue without
regard to whether APS shall thereafter become able or willing to supply all such
requirements. Further, APS shall notify PCP of its inability or unwillingness to
supply PCP with all of PCP's requirements of the Microsponge Systems as soon as
APS is aware of such facts. The 90-day and 180-day periods referred to in this
Section 7.3 shall not be extended by the force majeure provisions of Section 18
hereof.
8. Transitional Support. APS agrees that through April 30, 1997, it will
make available to PCP its facilities and personnel to promote and distribute the
Licensed Products in the same fashion as promoted and distributed prior to the
Closing Date in order to provide an orderly transition of the business.
-16-
<PAGE>
In consideration of such transition services, PCP will pay to APS monthly in
advance the estimated fully-loaded cost to APS of such services. At the end of
the transition period, the actual fully-loaded costs of such services will be
computed by the parties and any underpayment will forthwith be paid to APS by
PCP and any overpayment will forthwith be refunded by APS to PCP.
9. Additional Products. At the option of PCP, APS agrees to negotiate in
good faith from time to time for the development on behalf of PCP by APS, at
APS' fully-loaded development cost, of additional 0-T-C consumer products for
foot care or benzoyl peroxide products for treatment of acne that utilize APS'
Microsponge System and any improvements thereof. Such obligation of APS shall be
subject to any preexisting agreements of APS. In addition, APS shall consider at
its option any request by PCP that APS develop on behalf of PCP other O-T-C
consumer products that utilize APS' Microsponge System and any improvements
thereof.
10. Patents, Trademarks, Infringement.
10.1 If in the opinion of either party any issued patent
contained in APS Patent Rights has been infringed in the Territory by a product
in competition with a Licensed Product or any trademark licensed hereunder has
been infringed in the Territory by a third party, such party shall give to the
other party notice of such alleged infringement, in which event APS may at its
discretion take such steps as it may consider necessary to prosecute such
infringement. If APS, after such notice, elects to bring suit, it shall be
entitled to all damages recovered as a
-17-
<PAGE>
result of said infringement. If APS brings suit, other than with respect to the
ExAct trademark in Canada, and is unable to terminate the infringement within
two years from the date of original notice by PCP of the infringement, Licensed
Product covered by such APS Patent Rights or trademark shall thereafter be
treated for royalty purposes as if it were not covered by such APS Patent Rights
or trademark for so long as the infringement continues. PCP shall have the
right, at its own expense, to be represented by counsel in any such litigation.
If APS, after such notice from PCP, elects not to bring suit, it shall notify
PCP of such election within 30 days after receipt of such notice and PCP shall
then have the right to bring suit at its own expense or, if APS does not
diligently prosecute such suit in a manner reasonably necessary to protect the
rights of PCP hereunder, PCP shall similarly have the right to assume
prosecution of the suit at its own expense. PCP shall also have the right to
bring suit if APS fails to institute suit within six months from the date of the
original notice of infringement by PCP. In any litigation brought by PCP, PCP
shall have the right to use and sue in APS' name, and APS shall have the right,
at its own expense, to be represented by counsel. If PCP brings such suit, other
than with respect to the ExAct trademark in Canada, all royalty obligations with
respect to the Licensed Product competitive with the product reasonably believed
to be infringing, on a country-by-country basis, shall be suspended and
royalties permitted to accrue in a special account on PCP's books for that
purpose. APS shall be entitled to be paid such
-18-
<PAGE>
royalties on termination of any such suit reduced by reasonablE litigation
expenses incurred by PCP. If PCP receives any recovery or damages, said recovery
or damages shall be retained by PCP. Neither party shall settle any such suit
without the written consent of the other party if such settlement would impair
or prejudice the rights of the other party.
10.2 In the event PCP is sued by a third party charging
infringement of a patent resulting from the manufacture, use or sale of a
Microsponge System in a Licensed Product or an infringement of a third party's
rights resulting from the use of a trademark pursuant to the license of a
trademark hereunder (excluding, however, the use of the ExAct trademark in
Canada), PCP shall promptly notify APS. During the pendency of such suit, PCP
shall have the right to apply up to 50% of the royalties on such product in the
country of suit due to APS from the alleged infringing Licensed Product against
its litigation expenses reasonably incurred in such suit.
10.3 In the event that, pursuant to a judgment in any suit
claiming infringement of a patent or trademark of a third party by a Microsponge
System incorporated in a Licensed Product, PCP is required to pay damages or a
royalty to, grant a sublicense to, or enter into a cross-licensing arrangement
with a third party as a result of such claimed infringement or in the event of a
settlement of such suit consented to by APS (which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld) requiring damages or royalty payments to be made,
sublicenses to be granted, or cross-licenses to be entered into, APS shall pay
one-half of such
-19-
<PAGE>
damages or royalty payments.
10.4 APS warrants that it is presently not aware of (i) any
patents or patent applications owned by a third party and not licensed to APS
and licensed or to be licensed to PCP hereunder which would be infringed by the
practice of the presently existing Know-How or Patent Rights that are or may be
licensed or sublicensed to PCP hereunder or by the manufacture, use or sale of
the Microsponge System based thereon to be incorporated in a Licensed Product
or, (ii) except for the right to use the ExAct trademark in Canada, any
trademark owned by a third party and not licensed to APS that would be infringed
by the sale in the Territory of a Licensed Product under its present trademark,
nor has APS received any claims by third parties with respect to such matters.
11. Ownership of Technology. The Microsponge System, including but not
limited to Know-How as applicable to the Microsponge System, conceived or
reduced to practice during the term of this Agreement or within one year after
the term of this Agreement by Employees or agents of APS or PCP shall be the
sole property of APS and may be licensed or transferred by APS for any purpose
that is not inconsistent with its obligations under this Agreement but subject
to the rights of PCP set forth herein.
12. Warranties and Representations.
12.1 APS warrants and represents that, to its knowledge, it has
full right, title, and interest in and to or the right to practice all Know-How
and Patent Rights relating to the Microsponge System and that it has the right
to enter into
-20-
<PAGE>
the licenses and assignment set forth herein; that there are no outstanding
written or oral agreements inconsistent with this Agreement; and that it is
empowered to enter into this Agreement and grant the licenses and make the
assignments provided herein without burdens, encumbrances, restraints, or
limitations of any kind which could adversely affect the rights of PCP under
this Agreement except as may be set forth herein.
12.2 APS warrants and represents that it will prosecute and
maintain the patent applications and patents included in APS Patent Rights and
any federal and state trademark registrations set forth in Exhibit C hereto to
the extent that they cover Licensed Products.
12.3 APS warrants and represents that it knows of no rights of
others that would impede PCP's ability to sell any Licensed Product except as
provided in the Neet Agreement, provided that APS has approved in writing any
claims to be made for the Licensed Products.
12.4 APS warrants and represents that this Agreement covers
substantially all of PREMIER's business of which the Licensed Products are a
part, that the assignment is valid under the Neet Agreement and that by virtue
of such assignment PCP will acquire all of PREMIER's rights under such
Agreement. APS will promptly inform Reckitt & Colman Overseas and Reckitt &
Colman S.A. of the assignment and secure an acknowledgement from them of the
assignment and of PCP as the assignee.
12.5 APS warrants and represents that any filings with and
consents and approvals of any governmental agencies,
-21-
<PAGE>
including but not limited to the United States Food and Drug Administration, to
the extent required in connection with the offer, shipment and sale of Licensed
Products where presently sold in the applicable Territory have been obtained and
are in full force and effect and will not expire or be adversely affected as a
result of this Agreement.
13. Indemnification. APS agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless
PCP from and against any and all claims, costs, expenses, damages, losses,
actions or liabilities in connection with injuries to persons and property
caused or alleged to be caused by defects in or relating to Licensed Products
manufactured or sold prior to the Effective Date or sold by APS to PCP hereunder
for resale.
14. Term. Unless sooner terminated as herein provided, this Agreement
shall become effective on the Effective Date and shall continue in effect
thereafter until terminated in accordance with the terms hereof.
15. Termination.
15.1 Either PCP or APS may terminate this Agreement and any
licenses granted herein upon breach of any of the material terms herein by the
other party (including failure to pay earned royalties when due) upon 45-days'
prior written notice; provided that if during said 45 days the party so notified
cures the breach complained of then this Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect.
15.2 Termination of this Agreement shall not terminate the
obligations of PCP to make any payments pursuant to Sections
-22-
<PAGE>
4.6 and 6.1 or the obligations of confidentiality imposed on either party.
16. Publicity. Neither party will originate any publicity, news release,
public comment or other public announcement, written or oral, whether to the
press, to stockholders, or otherwise, relating to this Agreement, without the
written consent of the other party (which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld), except for such announcement which in accordance with the advice of
legal counsel to the party making such announcement is required by law. The
party making any announcement which is required by law will, unless prohibited
by law, give the other party an opportunity to review the form and content of
such announcement and comment before it is made. Either party shall have the
right to make such filings with governmental agencies as to the contents and
existence of this Agreement as it shall reasonably deem necessary or
appropriate.
17. Assignability.
17.1 This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without
the prior written consent of the other, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld, provided, that in any event either party may assign this Agreement an
Affiliate or to any party that acquires substantially all of such party's
business of which this Agreement may be a part.
17.2 No assignment permitted by this Article 17 shall serve to
release either party from liability for the performance of its obligations
hereunder.
-23-
<PAGE>
18. Notices. All notifications, demands, approvals and communications
required to be made under this Agreement shall be validly given if and when made
by mail prepaid and registered or certified (return receipt requested) addressed
to the address of the party to whom directed (as herein set forth or the latest
change thereof notified to the addressor). The parties hereto shall have the
right to notify each other of changes of address during the life of this
Agreement.
If to APS, ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.
3696 Haven Avenue
Redwood City, California 94063
Attention: President
If to PCP, PREMIER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.
106 Grand Avenue
P. O. Box 9610
Englewood, New Jersey 07631
Attention: Chairman
Any such notice mailed as aforesaid shall be deemed to have been
received by and given to the addressee on the date specified on the notice of
receipt and delivery returned to the sender.
19. Force Majeure. In the event of any failure or delay in the
performance by a party of any provision of this Agreement due to acts beyond the
reasonable control of such party (such as, for example, fire, explosion, strike
or other difficulty with workmen, shortage of transportation equipment,
accident, act of God, or compliance with or other action taken to carry out the
intent or purpose of any law or regulation), then such party shall have such
additional time to perform as shall be reasonably necessary under the
circumstances. In the event of such failure or delay, the affected party will
use its best efforts, consonant with sound business judgment and to the extent
permitted by law,
-24-
<PAGE>
to correct such failure or delay as expeditiously as possible.
20. Miscellaneous.
20.1 This Agreement is intended to define the full extent of the
legally enforceable undertakings of the parties hereto with respect to the
subject matter hereof, and no promise or representation, written or oral, which
is not set forth explicitly in this Agreement is intended by either party to be
legally binding. Both parties acknowledge that in deciding to enter into this
Agreement and to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby neither has
relied upon any statements or representations, written or oral, other than those
explicitly set forth in this Agreement.
20.2 It is the desire and intent of the parties that the
provisions of this Agreement shall be enforced to the extent permissible under
the laws and public policies applied in each jurisdiction in which enforcement
is sought. Accordingly, if any particular provision of this Agreement which
substantially affects the commercial basis of this Agreement shall be determined
to be invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be amended as hereinafter
provided to delete therefrom or revise the portion thus determined to be invalid
or unenforceable, such amendment to apply only with respect to the operation of
such provision of this Agreement in the particular jurisdiction for which such
determination is made. In such event, the parties agree to use reasonable
efforts to agree on substitute provisions, which, while valid, will achieve as
closely as possible the same economic effects or commercial basis as the
-25-
<PAGE>
invalid provisions, and this Agreement otherwise shall continue in full force
and effect. If the parties cannot agree to such revision within 60 days after
such invalidity or unenforceability is established, the matter may be submitted
by either party to arbitration as provided in this Agreement to finalize such
revision.
20.3 The waiver by a party of any single default or breach or
succession of defaults or breaches by the other shall not deprive either party
of any right under this Agreement arising out of any subsequent default or
breach.
20.4 All matters affecting the interpretation, validity, and
performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
California without regard to the conflicts of laws principles of such state.
20.5 Nothing in this Agreement authorizes either party to act as
agent for the other party as to any matter. The relationship between APS and PCP
is that of independent contractors.
20.6 Any and all disputes between the parties relating in any way
to the entering into of this Agreement and/or the validity, construction,
meaning, enforceability, or performance of this Agreement or any of its
provisions, or the intent of the parties in entering into this Agreement, or any
of its provisions, or any dispute relating to patent validity or infringement
arising under this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration. Such arbitration
shall be conducted at New York, New York, if initiated by APS, or at Palo Alto,
California, if
-26-
<PAGE>
initiated by PCP, in accordance with the rules then pertaining of the American
Arbitration Association with a panel of three arbitrators. Each party shall
select one arbitrator and the two selected arbitrators shall select the third
arbitrator. If the two selected arbitrators cannot agree on a third arbitrator
then the American Arbitration Association shall select said arbitrator from the
National Panel of Arbitrators. Reasonable discovery as determined by the
arbitrators shall apply to the arbitration proceeding. Judgment upon the award
rendered by the arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction
thereof. The successful party in such arbitration, in addition to all other
relief provided, shall be entitled to an award of all its reasonable costs and
expenses including attorney costs. Both parties agree to waive, and the
arbitrators shall have no right to award, punitive or consequential damages in
connection with an arbitration proceeding hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed by their duly authorized officers on the date first above written.
PREMIER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.
By:________________________________
Title:_____________________________
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.
-27-
<PAGE>
By:________________________________
Title:_____________________________
PREMIER, INC.
By:________________________________
Title:_____________________________
The undersigned hereby guarantees the performance by Premier Consumer
Products, Inc. of all of its obligations under the agreement set forth above.
LANDER CO., INC.
By: _______________________________
Title: ____________________________
-28-
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT B
Patent Rights
USA Issued Patents -
#4,690,825
#5,145,675
Canadian Issued Patents -
#128,355
-29-
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT C
Trademarks
Microsponge 1,481,281
EveryStep 1,788,744
ExAct Design 1,971,569
ExAct 1,782,010
Take-Off 1,304,541
-30-
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE I
Manufacturing Equipment and Tooling
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE II
Minimum Royalty Schedule
Cumulative Total
Minimum Royalties
------------------
Year I $ 525,000
Year II 1,050,000
Year III 1,700,000
Year IV 2,350,000
Year V 3,175,000
Year VI 4,000,000
Year VII 5,000,000
In the event that the Neet Agreement should be terminated by Reckitt &
Colman (Overseas) Limited and Reckitt & Colman SA in accordance with the
provisions of Section 11.2 of the Neet Agreement:
(i) the Minimum Royalties for Years IV through VII set forth
above shall be reduced as follows:
Year IV $ 2,150,000
Year V $ 2,775,000
Year VI $ 3,400,000
Year VII $ 4,200,000
and in consideration of such reduction
(ii) APS shall be entitled to retain any termination payments
made by Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited or Reckitt &
Colman SA pursuant to Section 11.3 of the Neet Agreement.
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE III
Inventories
(To be prepared promptly after December 31, 1996)
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 5,394,509
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 1,666,148
<ALLOWANCES> 47,527
<INVENTORY> 2,085,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 11,654,762
<PP&E> 13,465,088
<DEPRECIATION> 8,783,796
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 18,444,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 7,854,943
<BONDS> 5,578,849
<COMMON> 183,597
0
0
<OTHER-SE> 4,826,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 18,444,168
<SALES> 17,252,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 18,664,907
<CGS> 10,771,766
<TOTAL-COSTS> 10,771,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 16,345,328
<LOSS-PROVISION> 9,331
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 1,223,303
<INCOME-PRETAX> (9,378,099)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (9,378,099)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (9,378,099)
<EPS-PRIMARY> ($0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED> ($0.52)
</TABLE>
