FORM 8-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------------------------
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
February 16, 2000
----------------
(Date of earliest event reported)
DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL INC
--------------------------
(Exact name of Company as specified in charter)
Delaware 0-16211 39-1434669
-------- --------- ----------
(State of Incorporation) (Commission (IRS Employer
File Number) Identification No.)
570 West College Avenue, York, Pennsylvania 17405
- ------------------------------------------------------ -----
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Company's telephone number including area code ..............(717) 845-7511
Page 1 of 7
Exhibit Index on Page 6
<PAGE>
Item 4. Changes in Company's Certifying Accountant.
(a) Previous independent accountants
(i) On February 9,2000 DENTSPLY International(the Company) engaged
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its independent accountants for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2000 and chose not to renew the engagement of KPMG LLP,
which is currently serving as the Company's independent auditors.
(ii) The audit reports of KPMG LLP on the consolidated financial statements
of DENTSPLY International for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1998 and
December 31, 1997 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of
opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or
accounting principles.
(iii)The Company's Audit Committee participated in and recommended the
decision to change independent accountants which was approved by the Board of
Directors.
(iv) In connection with its audits for the two fiscal years ended December
31, 1998 and the subsequent interim period through February 9, 2000, there
were no disagreements with KPMG LLP on any matter of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure,
which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG LLP, would
have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in
connection with its report, except as described below. There was a
disagreement involving the Company's reporting of sales, cost of sales,
receivables and inventories for the third quarter of 1998. This disagreement
was discussed with the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
and the Company has authorized KPMG LLP to respond fully to the inquiries of
PricewaterhousCoopers LLP concerning the subject matter of the disagreement.
Management of the Company believed it had certain exposures relating to
receivables from dealers located in Asia and the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS) caused by the economic crisis in those geographic areas.
Accordingly, management recorded a $4,450,000 reduction in third quarter
sales and a related $1,980,000 reduction in cost of sales to reflect the fact
that the dealers may not be able to sell all of their inventories due to the
depressed economic environment and that higher than usual levels of product
returns would be received. Management believed that the anticipated returns
should be reflected as a reduction in sales and cost of goods sold with a
reduction in operating income of $2,470,000.
KPMG LLP concluded that the reduction in sales and related cost of sales in
the third quarter were not supportable by the facts presented by management
of the Company and, therefore, disagreed with the management on this matter.
KPMG LLP recommended to management that the reductions in sales and cost of
sales be reversed and that they reasonably estimate any additional bad debt
provisions that may be necessary for the Asian and CIS receivables.
Management agreed to reverse its recorded entries related to these matters
and decided to record an additional bad debt provision for $2,470,000 related
to receivables due from the dealers in Asia and the CIS.
(v) Not applicable.
(vi) The Company has requested that KPMG LLP furnish a letter stating whether
or not it agrees with the above statements. A copy of this letter dated
March 1, 2000 is filed as Exhibit 16 to this Amended Form 8-K.
(b) New independent accountants
The Company engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its new independent
accountants as of February 9, 2000. During the two most recent fiscal years
and through February 9, 2000, the Company has not consulted with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP regarding
2
<PAGE>
(i) the application of accounting principles to a specified
transaction, either completed or proposed;
(ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's
financial statements, and in no case was a written report provided to the
Company nor was oral advice provided that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a
decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or
(iii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as that term
is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related
instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, or a reportable event, as that
term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
3
<PAGE>
Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits
(c) Exhibits:
(16) Letter re change in certifying accountant
4
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
----------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.
DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL INC
--------------------------
(Company)
/s/William R. Jellison
------------------
William R. Jellison
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 1, 2000
5
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
--------------
Number Description Sequential Page No.
- ------ ----------- -------------------
16 Letter re change in 7
certifying accountant
6
EXHIBIT 16 - CHANGE IN CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Dear Sirs:
Dentsply International Inc.
On February 10, 2000, we were informed that Dentsply International Inc. had
engaged new principal auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2000, and
chose not to renew our engagement, which will cease upon completion of the audit
of Dentsply International Inc.'s consolidated financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 1999, and the issuance of our report thereon. We
have read Dentsply International Inc.'s statements included under Item 4 of its
Form 8-K dated February 16, 2000, and we agree with such statements, except
that:
Regarding Item 4(a) (i and iii), we are not in a position to agree or disagree
with Dentsply International Inc.'s statements that on February 9, 2000, Dentsply
International Inc. engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its independent
accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2000, and that Dentsply
International Inc.'s Audit Committee participated in and recommended the
decision to change independent accountants, which was approved by the Board of
Directors.
Regarding Item 4 (a) (iv), second paragraph, we are not in a position to agree
or disagree with management statements as to what management believed concerning
certain exposures related to receivables and anticipated returns. Additionally,
regarding Item 4 (a) (iv), third paragraph, KPMG LLP's disagreement related to
the entry recorded by management to reduce sales and cost of sales.
Mangagement's subsequent decision to establish a bad debt provision was not the
subject of our disagreement.
Regarding Item 4(b), we are not in a position to agree or disagree with Dentsply
International Inc.'s statement that during the two most recent fiscal years and
through February 9, 2000, Dentsply International Inc. has not consulted with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP regarding the application of accounting principles to
a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; the type of audit opinion
that might be rendered on Dentsply International Inc.'s financial statements;
that in no case was a written report provided nor was oral advice provided to
Dentsply International Inc. that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP concluded was an
important factor considered by Dentsply International Inc. in reaching a
decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or any
matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as that term is defined in
Item 304 (a) (1) (iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304
of Regulation S-K or a reportable event as that term is defined in Item 304 (a)
(1) (v) of Regulation S-K.
Very truly yours,
/s/KPMG LLP
7