CIM HIGH YIELD SECURITIES
PRE 14A, 2000-08-03
Previous: METROBANCORP, 4, 2000-08-03
Next: DELTA PETROLEUM CORP/CO, 8-K, 2000-08-03





                                 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION


Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by Registrant [ X ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ] Check the appropriate box:

[ X ]    Preliminary Proxy Statement
[    ]   Definitive Proxy Statement
[    ]   Definitive Additional Materials
[    ]   Soliciting Material Pursuant to Sec. 240.14a-11(c) or Sec. 240.14a-12

 ..............................................CIM High Yield Securities........
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 ..............................................Gail A. Hanson, Secretary.......
                   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[ X ]    No fee required.

[     ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

         1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

         2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

         3)       Per  unit  price  or other  underlying  value  of  transaction
                  computed  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
                  amount on which the filing fee is calculated  and state how it
                  was determined):

         4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

         5) Total fee paid:

[    ]   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[        ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as  provided  by  Exchange
         Act Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting
         fee was paid  previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration
         statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

         1)       Amount Previously Paid:

         2)       Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

         3)       Filing Party:

         4)       Date Filed:





<PAGE>




                            CIM HIGH YIELD SECURITIES
                               101 Federal Street
                           Boston, Massachusetts 02110


                    NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                         To be held on October 11, 2000


To the Shareholders of CIM HIGH YIELD SECURITIES:

         Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of  Shareholders  of CIM
High Yield Securities (the "Fund"), a Massachusetts business trust, will be held
at the offices of Bingham  Dana LLP,  150 Federal  Street,  25th Floor,  Boston,
Massachusetts  02110,  on October 11,  2000,  at 10:00 a.m.,  for the  following
purposes:

         1.       To elect one (1) Trustee of the Fund (Proposal 1).

         2.       To ratify the  selection of KPMG LLP as  independent  auditors
                  for the Fund for the fiscal  year  ending  December  31,  2000
                  (Proposal 2).

         3.       To approve or  disapprove  the  conversion  of the Fund from a
                  closed-end fund to an open-end fund (Proposal 3).

         4.       To transact  such other  business as may properly  come before
                  the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

         The Board of  Trustees  has fixed the close of  business  on August 14,
2000 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice
of and to vote at the meeting.

                                            By order of the Board of Trustees,


                                                              GAIL A. HANSON
                                                              Secretary

August 28, 2000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         SHAREHOLDERS  WHO DO NOT EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING ARE  REQUESTED TO
PROMPTLY COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE
WHICH NEEDS NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES.  INSTRUCTIONS
FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF PROXIES ARE SET FORTH ON THE INSIDE COVER.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>




                      Instructions for Signing Proxy Cards

         The  following  general  rules  for  signing  proxy  cards  may  be  of
assistance  to you and  avoid  the time and  expense  to the  Fund  involved  in
validating your vote if you fail to sign your proxy card properly.

1. Individual Accounts: Sign your name exactly as it appears in the registration
on the proxy card.

         2. Joint  Accounts:  Either  party may sign,  but the name of the party
signing should conform exactly to a name shown in the registration.

         3. All Other Accounts: The capacity of the individual signing the proxy
should be  indicated  unless it is reflected  in the form of  registration.  For
example:


         Registration                                           Valid Signature

         Corporate Accounts

         (1)      ABC Corp.                                 ABC Corp.
         (2)      ABC Corp.                                 John Doe, Treasurer
         (3)      ABC Corp.
                  c/o John Doe, Treasurer                   John Doe
         (4)      ABC Corp. Profit Sharing Plan             John Doe, Trustee

         Trust Accounts

         (1)      ABC Trust                                 Jane B. Doe, Trustee
         (2)      Jane B. Doe, Trustee
                  u/t/d 12/28/78                            Jane B. Doe

         Custodial or Estate Accounts

         (1)      John B. Smith, Cust.
                  f/b/o John B. Smith, Jr. UGMA         John B. Smith
         (2)      John B. Smith                    John B. Smith, Jr., Executor


                            Telephone/Internet Voting

[Shares held through various brokerage firms may offer the convenience of voting
via telephone or the Internet. If available, instructions are included with this
Proxy Statement and proxy card.]



<PAGE>



                                                       -18-

                            CIM HIGH YIELD SECURITIES

                               101 Federal Street
                           Boston, Massachusetts 02110
                                            ---------------------------

                         ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                                October 11, 2000
                                            ---------------------------

                                 PROXY STATEMENT

         This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection  with the  solicitation
of  proxies  by  the  Board  of  Trustees  of  CIM  High  Yield  Securities,   a
Massachusetts  business  trust (the  "Fund"),  for use at the Annual  Meeting of
Shareholders  of the Fund to be held on October 11, 2000,  at 10:00 a.m., at the
offices  of  Bingham  Dana  LLP,  150  Federal  Street,   25th  Floor,   Boston,
Massachusetts  02110,  and  at  any  adjournments  thereof  (collectively,   the
"Meeting").  A  Notice  of  Annual  Meeting  of  Shareholders  and a proxy  card
accompany this Proxy Statement.

         Proxy  solicitations will be made,  [beginning on or about ____, 2000,]
primarily  by  mail,  but  such  solicitations  may  also be made by  telephone,
telegraph,  [Internet] or personal interviews conducted by officers or employees
of the Fund; INVESCO, Inc. ("INVESCO" or the "Adviser"),  the investment adviser
of the Fund;  and PFPC Inc.  (formerly  known as First  Data  Investor  Services
Group,  Inc.),  the  administrator  and  transfer  agent  of  the  Fund  [and  a
wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Bank], or any of their affiliates.  [In addition,
the Fund has engaged/retained  ____ to assist in the solicitation of proxies for
the Meeting. ____ will receive a fee of $____ for its solicitation services plus
reimbursement  of out-of-pocket  expenses.] The costs of proxy  solicitation and
expenses incurred in connection with the preparation of this Proxy Statement and
its enclosures will be paid by the Fund. The Fund will also reimburse  brokerage
firms and others for their expenses in forwarding  solicitation  material to the
beneficial owners of Fund shares.

         The Fund's most recent  annual and  semi-annual  reports are  available
upon request,  without charge, by writing to PFPC Inc., 101 Federal Street,  6th
Floor,  Boston,  Massachusetts  02110,  or  calling  1-800-331-1710.  This Proxy
Statement and the enclosed proxy card will first be mailed to shareholders on or
about August 28, 2000.

         If the enclosed proxy card is properly executed and returned in time to
be  voted  at the  Meeting,  the  shares  represented  thereby  will be voted in
accordance with the instructions  marked thereon.  If no instructions are marked
on the  enclosed  proxy card,  shares  represented  thereby will be voted in the
discretion  of  the  persons  named  on  the  proxy  card.  Accordingly,  unless
instructions to the contrary are marked  thereon,  a proxy will be voted FOR the
election of the nominee as  Trustee,  FOR the  selection  of  auditors,  AGAINST
conversion  of the Fund from a  closed-end  investment  company  to an  open-end
investment  company,   and  FOR  any  other  matters  deemed  appropriate.   Any
shareholder  who has given a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time  prior
to its exercise  either by attending the Meeting and voting his or her shares in
person,  or by submitting a letter of  revocation or a later-dated  proxy to the
Fund at the above address prior to the date of the Meeting.

         Proxies that reflect  abstentions or broker "non-votes"  (i.e.,  shares
held by brokers or nominees as to which (i) instructions  have not been received
from the beneficial  owners or the persons  entitled to vote and (ii) the broker
or nominee does not have discretionary voting power on a particular matter) will
be counted as shares  that are  present  and  entitled to vote on the matter for
purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.  For this reason,  abstentions
and  broker  "non-votes"  will have the  effect of a "no" vote for  purposes  of
obtaining the requisite  approval of Proposals 1 through 3. Under the By-Laws of
the Fund, a quorum is  constituted  by the presence in person or by proxy of the
holders of more than 50% of the outstanding  shares of the Fund entitled to vote
at the Meeting.

         The close of  business  on August 14, 2000 has been fixed as the record
date for the determination of shareholders  entitled to notice of and to vote at
the Meeting and all adjournments thereof.

         The Fund has one class of shares of beneficial interest, par value $.01
per share.  On the  record  date,  August 14,  2000,  there were  ______  shares
outstanding  (the "Shares").  Each of such Shares is entitled to one vote at the
Meeting, and fractional Shares are entitled to proportionate shares of one vote.
To the  knowledge  of the Board of Trustees,  as of August 14,  2000,  no single
shareholder  or "group" (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act"))  beneficially  owned more than 5% of the
Fund's outstanding  Shares.  Information as to beneficial  ownership is based on
reports  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") by such
holders.  As of  August  14,  2000,  Cede & Co.,  a nominee  partnership  of The
Depository Trust Company, located at 7 Hanover Square, New York, New York 10004,
held ______ or ____% of the Fund's Shares.

         As of August 14, 2000,  the Trustees and officers as a group owned less
than [1]% of the Fund's outstanding Shares.

         In order that your Shares may be  represented  at the Meeting,  you are
requested to:

         --   indicate your instructions on the proxy card;

         --   date and sign the proxy card;

         --   mail the  proxy  card  promptly  in the  enclosed  envelope  which
              requires no postage if mailed in the  continental  United  States;
              and

-- allow sufficient time for the proxy to be received on or before 5:00 p.m., on
October 10, 1999.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF TRUSTEES.

         At the  Meeting,  one (1) of the  four  Trustees  of the  Fund is to be
elected,  to hold office for a period of three years and until his  successor is
elected and qualified. The Board of Trustees is divided into three classes. Each
year the term of office of one class will  expire.  The  nominee is  currently a
Trustee of the Fund and has indicated that he will serve, if elected,  but if he
should  be  unable to  serve,  the  proxy  will be voted  FOR any  other  person
determined by the persons named in the proxy in accordance  with their judgment.
[The  business  address of each  Trustee is 1166  Avenue of the  Americas,  27th
Floor, New York, NY 10036.]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>              <C>                                         <C>                              <C>

          Name, Age, Principal Occupation                                                   Shares of the Fund
             and Other Directorships*                       Served as a                  Beneficially Owned as of
            During the Past Five Years                      Trustee Since                     August 14, 2000
            --------------------------                      -------------                     ---------------

JOHN F. NICKOLL, age 65                                         1987                                 [6,196]
Trustee;  Director,  Chairman,  President
And Chief  Executive  Officer  of The
Foothill Group Inc., a commercial finance
and asset management company; Chairman
of Wells Fargo Business Credit.

The  following  Trustees  of the Fund  will  continue  to serve in such
capacity  until their terms of office expire and the  successors are elected and
qualified:

          Name, Age, Principal Occupation                                                   Shares of the Fund
             and Other Directorships*                       Served as a                  Beneficially Owned as of
            During the Past Five Years                      Trustee Since                     August 14, 2000
            --------------------------                      -------------                     ---------------

DR. BRUCE H. OLSON, age 64                                      1987                                 [1,656]
Trustee; Professor of Finance, Miami
University (Ohio); Trustee, Olde
Custodian Fund; Trustee, Summit
Investment Trust; term expires
2001.

DR. DONALD RATAJCZAK, age 57                                    1987                                [17,340]
Chairman of the Board of Trustees;
Former Director, Economic Forecasting
Center, Georgia State University;  Professor,
Georgia State University (retired
June 30,  2000);  Director,  Ruby  Tuesday,  Inc.;
Director,  Morgan,  Keegan &
Company;  Director, TBC Corporation;
President, Auric Metals (a publicly traded
investment company); term expires 2002


*    Directorships or Trusteeships of companies required to report to the SEC.


<PAGE>



Name, Age, Principal Occupation                                                             Shares of the Fund
             and other Directorships*                       Served as a                  Beneficially Owned as of
            During the Past Five Years                      Trustee Since                     August 14, 2000
            --------------------------                      -------------                     ---------------

ROBERT G. WADE, JR., age 72**                                   1987                             [2,984.597]
Trustee; Consultant to INVESCO, Inc.
from November 1996 to December 1998;
Chairman of the Board of Chancellor
Capital Management, Inc. and its
subsidiaries from January 1995 to
November 1996; President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board of Chancellor
Capital Management, Inc. and its
subsidiaries from 1988 to January 1995;
term expires 2002.


*    Directorships or Trusteeships of companies required to report to the SEC.
**   "Interested person" of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
</TABLE>

         The  principal  executive  officers of the Fund are listed in the table
below, along with certain additional information.  Each officer of the Fund will
hold such office  until a successor  has been  elected by the Board of Trustees.
[The business  address of each of these officers is 1166 Avenue of the Americas,
27th Floor, New York, NY 10036, except for Ms. Hanson, whose business address is
101 Federal Street, 6th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02110.]

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>          <C>                                    <C>

          Name, Age, Principal Occupation
            During the Past Five Years             Office (Year First Elected)

MICHAEL S. HYLAND, age 54                            President (2000)
Global Partner and Product Manager,
INVESCO, Inc. (since 1999); President
of Salomon Brothers Asset Management
(from 1989 to 1999);
Managing Director of Salomon
Brothers Inc. (from 1989 to 1999);
Managing Director, First Boston Corporation
from 1977 to 1989.

MARGARET RILEY, age 36                                        Treasurer (1997)
Chief Financial Officer, INVESCO, Inc.
(since September 1996); prior to
September, 1996 held various management
positions at Chancellor Capital
Management and its successor
corporations since 1989.

GAIL A. HANSON, age 58                                        Secretary (1997)
Vice President, PFPC Inc. (since December
1999); prior to December 1999, Counsel,
First Data Investor Services Group,
Inc.
</TABLE>

         The Fund pays each  Trustee  not  affiliated  with the  Adviser  or its
affiliates  an annual fee of $6,000 plus $1,000 as  compensation  for each board
meeting and each  committee  meeting  attended.  Each Trustee is reimbursed  for
travel and out-of-pocket  expenses associated with attending board and committee
meetings.  The Board of Trustees held five meetings (three of which were held by
telephone conference call) during the 1999 fiscal year, and each of the Trustees
attended  at least  75% of the  meetings.  The  aggregate  remuneration  paid to
Trustees by the Fund for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 1999  amounted to
$45,227 (including reimbursement for travel and out-of-pocket expenses).

         The Board of  Trustees  has an Audit  Committee  consisting  of Messrs.
Nickoll,  Olson and  Ratajczak.  The Audit  Committee met once during the fiscal
year ended  December  31,  1999,  and all member  Trustees  were  present at the
meeting.  The Audit Committee reviews the scope and results of the Fund's annual
audit with the Fund's independent auditors and recommends the engagement of such
independent  auditors.  The  Board  of  Trustees  performs  the  functions  of a
nominating committee.

         The  following  table  sets forth  certain  information  regarding  the
compensation of the Fund's Trustees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
The  officers of the Fund receive no  compensation  from the Fund for serving in
such capacity.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                <C>                            <C>                     <C>

                               Compensation Table

                                                                  Pension or              Total Compensation
                                      Aggregate               Retirement Benefits            From the Fund
       Name of Person               Compensation              Accrued as Part of            Complex Paid to
        and Position                From the Fund                Fund Expenses                 Trustees

Dr. Donald Ratajczak,                  $11,000                       $0                         $11,000
Chairman of the Board
of Trustees

Dr. Bruce H. Olson,                    $11,000                       $0                         $11,000
Trustee

John F. Nickoll,
Trustee                                $11,000                       $0                         $11,000

Robert G. Wade, Jr.,
Trustee                                $10,000                       $0                         $10,000

</TABLE>


<PAGE>


Required Vote

         Election of Mr. Nickoll for Trustee  requires the  affirmative  vote of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding  shares of the Fund  represented at
the Meeting in person or by proxy.

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL
1.

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.

         KPMG LLP ("KPMG"), 1600 Market Street, Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania, has
served as independent auditors for the Fund since its commencement of operations
on November 18, 1987,  and has been  selected to serve in such  capacity for the
Fund's  fiscal  year  ending  December  31,  2000 by the  Trustees  of the Fund,
including  a  majority  of those  members of the Board of  Trustees  who are not
"interested  persons" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or INVESCO.  KPMG
has  informed  the Fund  that it has no direct or  indirect  material  financial
interest in the Fund or INVESCO.  [It is expected that  representatives  of KPMG
will not attend the  Meeting,  but will be  available by telephone to respond to
appropriate questions/A representative of KPMG is expected to attend the Meeting
and to have the  opportunity  to make a  statement  and  respond to  appropriate
questions from the shareholders.]

Required Vote

         Ratification  of the selection of KPMG as independent  auditors for the
Fund  requires  the  affirmative  vote  of  the  holders  of a  majority  of the
outstanding shares of the Fund represented at the Meeting in person or by proxy.

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL
2.

PROPOSAL 3: TO CONVERT THE FUND FROM A CLOSED-END FUND TO AN OPEN-END FUND.

**THE  BOARD OF  TRUSTEES  DOES NOT FAVOR  THIS  PROPOSAL  AND  RECOMMENDS  THAT
SHAREHOLDERS VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL**

Introduction

         The Fund has operated as a diversified,  closed-end  investment company
since the  commencement of its investment  operations on November 18, 1987. As a
closed-end  fund,  the Fund's  shares are bought and sold on the American  Stock
Exchange at prevailing prices, which may be equal to, less than, or greater than
its net asset value.  The Fund's  Prospectus  provides that in each year, if the
Fund's shares have traded on the principal  securities  exchange where listed at
an average  discount  from net asset value of more than 10%,  determined  on the
basis of the average  percentage  discount from net asset value as of the end of
the last trading day in each week during the twelve calendar weeks preceding the
beginning  of such year,  the Fund will submit to its  shareholders  at the next
succeeding  annual meeting of shareholders a proposal to convert the Fund from a
closed-end fund to an open-end fund.

         For the twelve  calendar  week  period from  October  11, 1999  through
December 31, 1999, the Fund's shares traded on the American Stock Exchange at an
average  discount from net asset value of 16.44%,  determined in accordance with
the provisions of the Fund's  Prospectus.  As a result,  the Fund is required to
submit Proposal 3 for its shareholders' consideration at the Meeting.

Consideration and Recommendation of the Board of Trustees

         At meetings  held on April 5, 2000 and July 12, 2000,  the Fund's Board
of Trustees reviewed detailed  information  concerning the legal and operational
differences  between  closed-end and open-end funds, the Fund's performance as a
closed-end  fund,  the historical  relationship  between the market price of the
Fund's  shares and their net asset value and the possible  effects of conversion
on the Fund.  ALTHOUGH THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES  RECOGNIZES THAT THIS PROPOSAL MUST
BE MADE, THE TRUSTEES HAVE UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED NOT TO SUPPORT THIS PROPOSAL.

         The  Trustees  believe  that the  Fund's  status as a  closed-end  fund
provides  significant  investment  benefits not  available in an open-end  fund.
Because  the  Fund's  shares are not  redeemable,  the Fund is not  required  to
maintain  short-term   investments  in  anticipation  of  possible  redemptions.
Therefore,  the  Fund's  assets can be fully  invested  in pursuit of the Fund's
investment  objectives.  As an open-fund,  the Fund's investment strategy may be
hampered as the Adviser will be more  strictly  limited in its ability to invest
in less liquid securities.  Furthermore, as a closed-end fund, the Fund does not
experience the cash flows associated with sales and redemptions of open-end fund
shares.  As a result,  the Adviser does not have to invest  additional cash from
new sales at times when market  conditions are unfavorable or sell securities at
inopportune times to meet redemptions.

         The Fund's  operating  expenses are expected to increase if the Fund is
converted to an open-end  fund. As an open-end fund, the Fund would be required,
as a practical  matter,  to make a continuous  public  offering of its shares in
order to offset redemptions and maintain the economies of scale available at its
current size. All  shareholders  would bear the  transactional  costs associated
with  purchases and sales of securities in response to the sale or redemption of
shares if the Fund were converted to an open-end fund (except to the extent that
the Trustees decide to impose a temporary  redemption fee, as described  below).
Furthermore,  the Trustees may,  following the  conversion to an open-end  fund,
recommend that  shareholders  approve the adoption of a distribution  plan under
Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act.  Under a Rule 12b-1 plan, the Fund would pay for the
distribution and marketing of its shares.

         Open-end  funds,  since they  continually  issue new  shares,  have the
ability to increase in size.  This growth could result in  efficiencies as fixed
costs are spread  over a larger pool of assets.  Alternatively,  since they also
continually  redeem  shares,  open-end  funds can also decrease in size. In that
case, expense ratios may increase. The Adviser has advised the


<PAGE>


Trustees  that  it is  possible  that  the  Fund  might  experience  significant
redemptions  following any conversion,  thereby shrinking in size.  Depending on
the size of the  redemptions  and any  sales of new  shares,  increased  expense
ratios could result.

         The need to sell securities as an open-end fund to meet redemptions may
have adverse tax consequences to shareholders remaining in the Fund. If the Fund
sells securities to meet  redemptions and realizes a gain for tax purposes,  the
Fund will be required to allocate  the tax gain to  remaining  shareholders.  In
order to retain its  qualification as a regulated  investment  company under the
Internal Revenue Code and thus be relieved of taxation at the investment company
level,  the Fund is required to  distribute  net realized  capital  gains to its
shareholders who do not redeem their shares and remain shareholders of the Fund.
This would have two negative  consequences.  First,  non-redeeming  shareholders
would recognize and be required to pay taxes on a greater amount of capital gain
than would otherwise be the case. Secondly, the Fund may need to sell additional
portfolio  securities  in order to make the  required  distribution  of realized
capital  gains,  thereby  further  reducing  the size of the  Fund and  possibly
causing the  realization  of additional  net capital  gains.  As of December 31,
1999,   the  Fund  had  a  tax  loss  carry   forward  of   $5,447,958.   As  of
[________,2000], the Fund had net unrealized depreciation of [$_______].

         While  conversion  would eliminate the possibility of the Fund's shares
ever  trading at a discount  from net asset value,  the Board of Trustees  noted
that, from inception  through  December 31, 1999, the Fund's shares from time to
time  have  traded  at a  premium,  and that,  notwithstanding  the more  recent
discounts during the last 12 calendar weeks of 1999, the shares have traded from
inception through __________,  2000 at an average [premium/discount] discount of
___%. The Fund's average annual premium/discount by year is as follows:

     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    Year                         Premium/Discount
     ---------------------------------- -------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1988                               2.45%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1989                              -3.87%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1990                              -14.20%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1991                              -7.06%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1992                              -0.45%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1993                               2.51%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1994                               2.65%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1995                               3.88%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1996                               2.73%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1997                               1.62%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1998                               2.32%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
                    1999                              -8.83%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
           2000 thru [_____, 2000]                     ___%
     ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------

         [The Trustees  also noted that,  when compared to the Fund's peer group
(as defined by Lipper  Analytical  Services) the Fund's discount is in line with
the discounts at which the shares of its peer group trade.]

                       [Insert chart showing comparison.]

         On __________,  2000, the closing price of a Fund share on the American
Stock Exchange was ___% below its net asset value.

         In  deciding  whether to  recommend  the  conversion  of the Fund,  the
Trustees  noted  that the  performance  of the Fund was an  important  factor to
consider.  In light of the Fund's  long-term  performance,  the  Trustees do not
believe that eliminating the possibility of a discount justifies the fundamental
changes which would result from a conversion to an open-end fund,  including the
loss of the  investment  advantages of a closed-end  fund and the  likelihood of
increased operating expenses and taxable gains.

         The Fund  leverages by borrowing  funds from a bank and investing  such
borrowed funds in high-yield fixed income securities. The Fund's use of leverage
has benefited  shareholders  because the average cost of such borrowed funds has
been less than the interest  income of the  high-yield  securities.  If the Fund
converts to an open-end fund it will be less  practical to maintain the benefits
of  leveraging.  Because  the net assets of an  open-end  fund change on a daily
basis,  the Fund will have to  increase or decrease  its  borrowings  on a daily
basis to remain leveraged to the extent it is as a closed-end fund.

         The Trustees believe that most shareholders of the Fund purchased their
shares with a  long-term  investment  perspective  that  recognizes  the special
advantages of the closed-end structure. In addition, many shareholders purchased
their Fund  shares at a discount  and have not been  adversely  affected  by the
discount.  Consequently,  the Trustees do not believe that the recent history of
greater  discounts,  which may be  temporary,  should be viewed as  grounds  for
depriving shareholders of the advantages of the closed-end fund structure.

FOR ALL OF THE  FOREGOING  REASONS,  THE  TRUSTEES  UNANIMOUSLY  RECOMMEND  THAT
SHAREHOLDERS VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.

Differences Between Closed-End and Open-End Investment Companies

         In  evaluating  this  Proposal,  shareholders  may wish to consider the
following differences between closed-end and open-end funds:

         CHANGES IN CAPITAL.  Closed-end  funds raise their  capital  through an
initial  public  offering  and  rights  offerings  and  generally  do not  raise
additional  capital after that time.  Closed-end  funds  therefore  have limited
opportunities to gain additional economies of scale through growth of assets. At
the same time,  because shares of closed-end funds cannot be redeemed,  the risk
of higher expense ratios resulting from a decline in assets is also limited.

         Open-end funds, in contrast,  generally  engage in a continuous  public
offering of their shares,  which provides the  opportunity  for growth of assets
and reduced  expense  ratios.  However,  because  shares of  open-end  funds are
generally  redeemable  at any time,  such funds face the risk of higher  expense
ratios if significant redemptions are not offset by sales of new shares.

          If the Fund were to convert to an open-end fund, it is likely that the
Adviser would be subject to pressure to sell portfolio  securities at times when
the Adviser believes that it should be investing, and to invest in new portfolio
securities  when the  Adviser  believes  that it should be  reducing  the Fund's
exposure  to the market.  As the  manager of a  closed-end  fund,  however,  the
Adviser  currently is able to ride through market swings without being pressured
to invest new money or liquidate  portfolio  holdings at inopportune  times, and
can manage the Fund with a greater emphasis on long-term considerations.

         As stated above,  significant  redemptions following a conversion would
require the Fund to sell portfolio securities,  significantly reducing the asset
size of the Fund.  These  transactions  involve  costs  and could  result in the
recognition  of capital gains for federal  income tax  purposes.  Such costs and
liabilities would be borne by all remaining  shareholders,  except to the extent
that the  Trustees  decide to impose a temporary  redemption  fee, as  described
below.

         REDEMPTIONS OF SHARES.  Shares of open-end funds may be redeemed at any
time at their net asset value (subject only to the right of the Fund to withhold
payment  for up to seven days or to impose a temporary  redemption  fee or, with
the permission of the SEC, to suspend  redemptions under emergency  conditions).
In contrast,  shares of closed-end funds are not redeemable and can generally be
bought and sold at current  market  prices on the  exchanges on which such funds
are listed. The shares' current market price may reflect a discount (when shares
are trading  below net asset value) or a premium  (when shares are trading above
net asset value).  Currently, the Fund's shares are trading at a discount to net
asset value. If the Fund is converted to an open-end fund, shareholders who wish
to realize the value of their shares  would be able to do so by redeeming  their
shares at net asset value (less any redemption  fee imposed by the Trustees,  as
discussed  below).  As a result,  the discount from net asset value at which the
Fund's  shares  currently  trade  would be  eliminated.  Conversion  would  also
eliminate,  however,  the  possibility  that the Fund's  shares might trade at a
premium in the future.

         REGULATORY  REQUIREMENTS.   Both  closed-end  and  open-end  funds  are
registered  with the SEC under the  Investment  Company Act of 1940,  as amended
(the "1940 Act") and, with certain differences  relating largely to the sale and
redemption of shares, are generally subject to the same regulatory  requirements
of that Act.  The Fund's  shares are listed for  trading on the  American  Stock
Exchange.  That listing  would be  terminated in the event of a conversion to an
open-end  fund.  Since open-end funds  generally  engage in a continuous  public
offering of their shares,  they are required to maintain  current  registrations
under federal and state securities laws, which involve additional costs.

         ANNUAL  SHAREHOLDER  MEETINGS.  The Fund is  currently  required by the
rules of the American Stock Exchange to hold annual meetings of shareholders for
the purpose of electing  Trustees and ratifying  the  selection of auditors.  As
noted  above,  conversion  of the  Fund to an  open-end  fund  would  result  in
termination of the Fund's listing on the American Stock Exchange with the result
that the Fund  would no longer be  required  to hold  annual  meetings.  In such
event,  the Fund  expects  that  shareholder  meetings  would be held only on an
as-needed basis.

         By not having to hold annual shareholder meetings,  the Fund would save
the costs of preparing proxy materials and soliciting  shareholder  votes on the
proposals  contained  therein.  Based on the  number of  outstanding  shares and
shareholders   of  the  Fund  as  of  the  record  date,  such  costs  aggregate
approximately  [$_________]  per  year.  These  savings,  however,  would not be
expected to materially affect the Fund's expense ratio.  Under the 1940 Act, the
Fund would be required to hold a  shareholder  meeting if, among other  reasons,
the number of Trustees elected by the shareholders  were less than a majority of
the total  number of  Trustees  or if  changes  were  sought in the  fundamental
investment  policies of the Fund.  In  addition,  holders of at least 10% of the
Fund's outstanding shares may require the Fund to hold a shareholder meeting for
the purpose of voting on the removal of any Trustee or for any other purpose.

         INVESTMENT FLEXIBILITY.  As noted above, the cash flows associated with
sales and  redemptions of open-end fund shares,  as well as the need to maintain
cash  reserves  in  anticipation  of  possible  redemptions,  tend to reduce the
investment flexibility of open-end funds.

         LEVERAGE.  Closed-end  funds are  permitted to issue senior  securities
representing debt (i.e. bonds,  debentures,  notes and other similar securities)
or  preferred  stock,  subject to  certain  conditions.  In the case of debt,  a
closed-end  fund  must  have  asset  coverage  of 300%  immediately  after  such
issuance,  and no dividends on shares may be paid unless the debt  generally has
an asset  coverage  of 300% at that time.  A  closed-end  fund is not limited to
borrowing from banks. Open-end funds are prohibited by the 1940 Act from issuing
senior securities representing debt, other than indebtedness to banks when there
is  asset  coverage  of at  least  300% for all  borrowings,  and may not  issue
preferred  stock.  At  present,  a  fundamental  investment  policy  of the Fund
prevents the Fund from borrowing amounts in excess of 25% of its gross assets.

         SHAREHOLDER  PRIVILEGES.  Shareholders  of the Fund  currently have the
option of  participating in the Fund's Dividend  Reinvestment  Plan, under which
cash  distributions  paid by the  Fund  are  generally  reinvested  through  the
purchase of additional Fund shares at market prices (which  currently  reflect a
discount from net asset value). At times when the Fund's shares are trading at a
premium over their net asset value, such reinvestments are made at the higher of
net  asset  value or 95% of  market  value.  For the three  year  period  ending
December  1999,  19.47%  of  the  Fund's  shareholders  have  re-invested  their
distributions  and are  purchasing  more than a dollar of net  assets  for every
dollar  re-invested  while paying no brokerage  commission.  If the Fund were to
convert to an open-end  fund,  shareholders  would no longer be able to reinvest
dividends at a price below net asset value per share.



<PAGE>


Measures to be Adopted in the Event  Shareholders Vote to Convert the Fund to an
Open-End Fund

         In the  event  that  shareholders  vote  to  convert  the  Fund  from a
closed-end  fund to an open-end fund, a number of additional  actions would need
to be taken not only to effect the  conversion  of the Fund to an open-end  fund
but also to allow the Fund to operate effectively as an open-end fund.

         REDEMPTION  FEE.  In order to reduce the number of  redemptions  of the
Fund's shares immediately  following conversion (thereby reducing any disruption
of the  Fund's  normal  portfolio  management),  and to offset the costs of such
redemptions,  the Trustees are likely to approve the  implementation of a fee of
up to [_____]% of the redemption proceeds payable by the Fund on all redemptions
(whether  in  cash  or in  kind)  for a  certain  period  following  the  Fund's
conversion. The Trustees will approve the imposition of this fee if they believe
that  immediately   following  conversion  to  an  open-end  fund,   significant
redemptions of shares would disrupt long-term  portfolio  management of the Fund
and dilute the  interests of the  remaining  shareholders.  Any  imposition of a
redemption  fee will be intended to deter  certain  redemptions  and  compensate
remaining  long-term  shareholders  for  the  costs  of  the  liquidation  of  a
significant percentage of the Fund's portfolio.

         REDEMPTIONS  IN KIND.  The Board of  Trustees  may reserve the right to
meet redemptions occurring during the first year following the Fund's conversion
to an  open-end  fund by  delivering  the  Fund's  portfolio  securities  to the
redeeming shareholder in kind, rather than paying cash. Such redemptions in kind
would shift the cost of liquidating  the portfolio  securities  from the Fund to
the  redeeming  shareholder,  and,  to the extent  appreciated  securities  were
delivered, would avoid the recognition of capital gains by the Fund.

         MINIMUM  INVESTMENT  AND  INVOLUNTARY  REDEMPTIONS.   If  the  Fund  is
converted to an open-end  investment company, it will adopt requirements that an
initial  investment in Fund shares and any  subsequent  investment  must be in a
specified minimum amount in order to reduce the administrative burdens and costs
incurred in  monitoring  numerous  small  accounts.  The Fund  expects  that the
minimum  initial  investment   requirement  will  be  [$____]  and  the  minimum
subsequent  investment  requirement will be [$____]. The Fund also would reserve
the right to redeem,  upon notice,  the shares of any shareholder  whose account
has a net asset value of less than  [$____],  other than an account  which is an
IRA or other tax-deferred retirement plan.

         UNDERWRITING  AND  DISTRIBUTION.  If  conversion to an open-end fund is
approved,  the Board of Trustees  will consider the details of and enter into an
appropriate  distribution  agreement for the  distribution of the Fund's shares.
Pursuant  to any such  distribution  agreement,  Fund shares will be offered and
sold  directly by the  distributor  itself and other  broker-dealers  which have
entered  into selling  agreements  with the  distributor.  There is no assurance
however,  that  the  distributor  or any  such  broker-dealer  would  be able to
generate  sufficient  sales of Fund shares to offset  redemptions,  particularly
during the initial months following conversion.

         The  distribution  and marketing of open-end  funds involve  additional
costs.  These costs may be paid either by purchasers (in the case of a front-end
sales charge) or by current  shareholders (in the case of a plan of distribution
adopted  under Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act),  which would require the approval of
shareholders.  In the event that  conversion  to an open-end fund is approved by
Fund  shareholders,  it is expected that the Board of Trustees will consider the
implementation  of a Rule 12b-1 plan  providing for payments by the Fund for the
distribution and marketing of its shares at an annual rate of .25% of the Fund's
average net assets.

         AMENDMENT OF THE FUND'S  DECLARATION  OF TRUST.  Conversion of the Fund
from a closed-end  fund to an open-end fund will require  certain changes to the
Fund's  Declaration  of Trust.  The  Declaration  of Trust  would be  amended to
require the Fund to purchase all shares  offered to it for redemption at a price
equal to the net asset value of the shares next determined,  less any redemption
charge fixed by the Trustees.  Notwithstanding this provision,  all shares would
be redeemable at a shareholder's option.

         The  Declaration  of Trust would also be amended to include  provisions
commonly found in the governing documents of open-end funds.  Specifically,  the
Declaration  of Trust would be amended to authorize  the issuance of  additional
series of shares and classes  thereof from time to time as the Trustees in their
discretion may determine.  Each series would have its own investment  objective,
policies and restrictions and shares of each series would represent interests in
separate investment portfolios,  each of which would be accounted for separately
on the books of the Fund with respect to income,  earnings,  profits,  proceeds,
assets and liabilities  attributable to that series. Shares of each series would
be  entitled  to vote  separately  to approve  investment  advisory  agreements,
changes in fundamental  investment  restrictions  and  distribution  plans,  but
shares of all series  would vote  together on the  election of Trustees  and the
ratification  of the  selection of  accountants.  Classes of a series would have
such preferences or special or relative  rights,  and privileges as the Trustees
may  determine,  and each class  would vote  separately  on issues  that  relate
exclusively to that class.

         The Fund's Declaration of Trust would also be amended to declassify the
Board of Trustees.  Currently,  the Fund's Declaration of Trust provide that the
Board of Trustees be divided into three classes of Trustees. Each Trustee serves
for three years with one class being elected each year. The classified Board was
intended, in part, to reduce the Fund's vulnerability to an unsolicited takeover
proposal  or similar  action that does not  contemplate  an  acquisition  of all
outstanding shares of the Fund by making it more difficult and time-consuming to
change majority control of the Board of Trustees without its consent.

         Finally,   the  Trustees   would  also  make  certain   technical   and
non-material  changes to the Declaration of Trust and conforming  changes to the
Fund's By-Laws if the  shareholders  vote in favor of the conversion of the Fund
to an open-end fund.

         Therefore,  a vote in favor of converting  the Fund to an open-end fund
would also  authorize the Trustees to amend the Fund's  Declaration  of Trust to
reflect such changes.

         AMENDMENT  TO  MANAGEMENT  AGREEMENT.  If Proposal 3 is  approved,  the
Fund's  Investment  Advisory  Agreement  with INVESCO would be amended to delete
certain expenses payable by the Fund which are inapplicable to an open-end fund,
such as those  relating to listing the Fund's common stock on the American Stock
Exchange and administering the Fund's Dividend Reinvestment Plan.

         CHANGING  CERTAIN  FUNDAMENTAL  INVESTMENT  POLICIES.  If Proposal 3 is
approved,  the Fund's investment  objective,  which is to provide current income
while protecting its shareholders'  capital to the extent possible,  will remain
unchanged.  However,  if the proposal to convert the Fund to an open-end fund is
approved it is likely that  shareholders  will be asked to approve certain other
changes to the Fund's fundamental  investment  policies.  Some of the changes to
the Fund's fundamental  investment policies (like the policy regarding borrowing
as described  above) will be necessitated by certain  requirements  for open-end
funds under the 1940 Act.  Other  changes will be  recommended  so that the Fund
will have the full flexibility permitted by applicable law.

If the Conversion is Not Approved

         In the event that  shareholders  do not approve the  conversion  of the
Fund to an open-end  fund,  the Fund will  continue as a closed-end  fund and no
changes will be made to the Fund's Declaration of Trust.

THE TRUSTEES  BELIEVE THAT THE  CONTINUED  OPERATION OF THE FUND AS A CLOSED-END
FUND  IS IN THE  BEST  LONG-TERM  INTERESTS  OF  SHAREHOLDERS,  AND  UNANIMOUSLY
RECOMMEND A VOTE AGAINST THE  CONVERSION OF THE FUND TO AN OPEN-END FUND AT THIS
TIME.

Required Vote

         Approval of the conversion of the Fund to an open-end fund and approval
of the related  amendments to the Fund's  Declaration of Trust each requires the
affirmative  vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding  shares of the
Fund.

         If such conversion is approved,  the conversion  would become effective
following  compliance with all necessary  regulatory  requirements under federal
and  state  law.  The  Fund  would  seek to  complete  this  process  as soon as
reasonably  practicable,  but it is  estimated  that this process may require at
least several months.

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES  UNANIMOUSLY  RECOMMENDS  THAT  SHAREHOLDERS  VOTE AGAINST
PROPOSAL 3.

                      DATE TO SUBMIT SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

         All proposals by shareholders  that are intended to be presented at the
Fund's next Annual Meeting of  Shareholders  to be held in 2001 must be received
by the Fund on or  before  [April  25,  2001],  in order  to be  considered  for
inclusion  in the Fund's  proxy  statement  and form of proxy  relating  to that
meeting.



<PAGE>


                             ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Investment Adviser and Administrator

         INVESCO,  Inc. serves as the Fund's investment adviser and its business
address is 1166 Avenue of the Americas,  27th Floor,  New York,  NY 10036.  PFPC
acts as the  Fund's  administrator  and is located at 101  Federal  Street,  6th
Floor, Boston,  Massachusetts 02110. [PFPC is a leading provider of full service
mutual fund shareholder and record keeping  services.  In addition to its mutual
fund transfer  agent and record  keeping  service,  PFPC provides  complimentary
services through its own subsidiary business units.]

Compliance with the 1934 Act

         Section  16(a)  of the  1934  Act  requires  the  Fund's  officers  and
Trustees,  certain  persons  affiliated  with  INVESCO,  Inc.  and  persons  who
beneficially own more than 10% of the Fund's shares to file reports of ownership
and changes of ownership with the SEC and the American Stock Exchange, Inc. [and
to furnish  the Fund with copies of all  Section  16(a) forms they file.]  Based
solely  upon its review of the copies of such forms  received  by it and written
representations  from certain of such persons, the Fund believes that during its
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, all such filing requirements  applicable to
such persons were [complied with/met.]

OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING

         No business other than the matters  described above is expected to come
before the Meeting, but should any other matter requiring a vote of shareholders
arise,  including  any  question as to an  adjournment  or  postponement  of the
Meeting,  the  persons  named on the  enclosed  proxy  card  will  vote  thereon
according to their best judgment in the interests of the Fund.


August 28, 2000



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IT IS  IMPORTANT  THAT  PROXIES BE RETURNED  PROMPTLY.  SHAREHOLDERS  WHO DO NOT
EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING ARE  THEREFORE  URGED TO COMPLETE,  SIGN,  DATE AND
RETURN THE PROXY CARD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



<PAGE>


                            CIM HIGH YIELD SECURITIES
                    PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES


         The undersigned  hereby appoints Margaret Riley and Gail A. Hanson, and
each of them,  attorneys  and  proxies for the  undersigned,  with full power of
substitution and revocation,  to represent the undersigned and to vote on behalf
of the undersigned all shares of CIM High Yield Securities which the undersigned
is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Fund to be held
at the offices of Bingham  Dana LLP,  150 Federal  Street,  25th Floor,  Boston,
Massachusetts  02110 on October 11, 2000,  at 10:00 a.m.,  and any  adjournments
thereof.  The undersigned hereby  acknowledges  receipt of the Notice of Meeting
and Proxy  Statement,  and hereby  instructs  said attorneys and proxies to vote
said shares as indicated hereon. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized
to vote upon such other  business as may  properly  come before the  Meeting.  A
majority  of the  proxies  present  and  acting at the  Meeting  in person or by
substitute  (or, if only one shall be so present,  then that one) shall have and
may exercise  all of the power and  authority  of said  proxies  hereunder.  The
undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously given.


CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE                   SEE REVERSE SIDE


<PAGE>



  X Please mark votes as in this example.

This proxy,  if properly  executed,  will be voted in the manner directed by the
undersigned  shareholder.  IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR
ELECTION OF THE NOMINEE AS TRUSTEE AND FOR PROPOSAL 2, BUT AGAINST PROPOSAL 3.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>     <C>                                                     <C>             <C>                   <C>

1.   ELECTION OF TRUSTEE:
     Nominee:
     John F. Nickoll                                          ___  FOR       ___ WITHHELD

2. To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP
     as independent auditors for the Fund.                    ___  FOR       ___  AGAINST          ___  ABSTAIN

3.    To approve the conversion of the Fund
     from a closed-end fund to an open-end fund               ___  FOR       ___  AGAINST          ___  ABSTAIN

</TABLE>

MARK HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE AND NOTE BELOW ______


PLEASE SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Note:  Please sign exactly as your name appears on this Proxy.  If joint owners,
EITHER may sign this Proxy. When signing as attorney,  executor,  administrator,
trustee, guardian or corporate officer, please give your full title.


Signature:                                           Date:


Signature:                                           Date:



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission