MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC /DE/, 10-K/A, 1997-01-31

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC /DE/
10-K/A, 1997-01-31
SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS

Previous: AMERICAN CONSOLIDATED LABORATORIES INC, DEFS14C, 1997-01-31

Next: MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC /DE/, 10-Q/A, 1997-01-31

<PAGE> 1

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

--------------

FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For fiscal year ended MARCH 31, 1996
----------------------------------

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For transition period from to
------------ ------------

Commission File Number 0-16594

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware 59-27404462
-------- -----------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)

12920 Automobile Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 34622
- - - - ------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(813) 576-6311
--------------
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
NONE NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01
----------------------------
(Title of Class)

COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS
------------------------------
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K/A or any amendment to
this Form 10-K/A. [ ]

Aggregate market value of voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates was
$3,700,000 as of July 1, 1996.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court. [x] Yes [ ] No

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock, $.01 par
value, was 5,444,335 as of July 1, 1996.

Documents Incorporated by Reference
-----------------------------------
NONE

Total number of pages, including cover page - 65 (excluding exhibits)

<PAGE> 2

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.

CLEARWATER, FLORIDA

INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PART I PAGE
----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-11

2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

3. Legal proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-12

4. Submission of matters to a vote of security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

PART II
5. Market for registrant's common equity and related
stockholder matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-15

6. Selected financial data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

7. Management's discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-24

8. Financial statements and supplementary data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

9. Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting
and financial disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

PART III

10. Directors and executive officers of the Registrant . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-27

11. Executive compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28-31

12. Security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32-33

13. Certain relationships and related transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33-36

PART IV
14. Exhibits, financial statements, schedules and reports on Form 8-K . . . . . 37

SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
</TABLE>

<PAGE> 3

PART I

This report contains certain forward-looking statements regarding future
financial condition and results of operations and the Company's business
operations. The words "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," "predict" and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such
statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including industry and
economic conditions, customer actions and other factors discussed in this
report and in the Company's other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or
should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary
materially from those indicated.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Introduction

Medical Technology Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
was incorporated in March 1984. The Company is a holding Company operating
through a number of separate subsidiaries. MTS Packaging Systems, Inc., Medical
Technology Laboratories, Inc., Performance Pharmacy Systems, Inc., and MTS
Sales and Marketing, Inc. These subsidiaries provide a diverse line of
proprietary medication dispensing systems, other medical products and clinical
diagnostic services to the health care industry.

MTS Packaging Systems, Inc. ("MTS Packaging"), primarily manufactures and
sells disposable medication punchcards, packaging equipment and allied
ancillary products. Its customers are predominantly pharmacies that supply
nursing home and assisted living patients with prescription medications. This
subsidiary manufactures its proprietary disposable punchcards and packaging
equipment in its own facilities. This manufacturing process utilizes technology
advanced integrated machinery for manufacturing the disposable medication
punchcards.

The disposable medication punchcards and packaging equipment are designed
to provide a cost effective and customized method for pharmacies dispensing
medications at competitive prices. The Company's medication dispensing systems
and products are relatively new and innovative for dispensing medications in
disposable packages.

Medical Technology Laboratories, Inc. ("MTL") was formed as a result of
the acquisition of Clearwater Medical Services and Clinical Diagnostic Centers
during the third quarter of fiscal year 1992. MTL conducts clinical laboratory
services and testing for hospitals, physicians and other health care providers
in the State of Florida. On March 17, 1995, MTL purchased the rights and
interests in certain clinical laboratory services of Tampa Pathology Laboratory,
including the right, title and interest in the customer accounts associated with
Tampa Pathology Laboratory and the right to service and continue sales of
clinical laboratory services to these customers. The purchase agreement provided
for a purchase price of approximately $1,400,000. As part of its plan of
reorganization, which was approved by the Bankruptcy Court on September 4, 1996
(the "Plan of Reorganization"), the Company negotiated to reduce the purchase
price to $500,000. See "Item 3. Legal Proceedings."

The Company acquired all of the Common Stock of Vangard Labs, Inc.
("Vangard") on June 1, 1992. Vangard suspended operations in January 1996.
Vangard, now identified as a discontinued operation for reporting purposes,
previously packaged and sold oral solid unit-dose generic drugs to hospital and
nursing home institutional pharmacies. The machinery used to fill the
medication punchcards was supplied by MTS Packaging.

The Company, in cooperation with its lenders, intends to sell the assets
of Vangard and use the proceeds to retire debt. A small number of employees
have been retained and an independent consulting firm has been engaged to
assist in the effort to sell the business. The principal assets of Vangard are
comprised of an inventory of generic pharmaceuticals, certain machinery and
equipment and two buildings. The buildings are currently encumbered by a
mortgage held by the City of Glasgow, a local government agency.

<PAGE> 4

The Company acquired a majority of the Common Stock of Performance
Pharmacy Systems, Inc. ("Performance Pharmacy") on November 9, 1992. This
subsidiary develops and sells pharmaceutical software systems for hospitals and
nursing homes to use in their in-house pharmacies.

On November 3, 1993, the Company signed a joint venture agreement to
create Glasgow Pharmaceutical Corporation ("GPC") for the purpose of marketing
and selling pharmaceutical products to the long-term health care industry. GPC
is owned 50% by Vangard and 50% by Creighton Pharmaceuticals Corporation
("Creighton"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
The GPC joint venture was created in the belief that it might provide the
Company with a competitive price advantage in the acquisition cost of its
pharmaceuticals as well as provide additional product lines. The principal
product of GPC is MedCard, which is a medication punchcard that can be
prefilled with oral solid generic and brand name drugs. Operations of GPC did
not commence until May 1994.

The Company formed Medication Management Systems, Inc. ("MMS") during
fiscal year 1995. The Company formed MMS to expand its hospital pharmacy
management software (known as Performance) which has been sold to approximately
120 hospitals throughout the United States. MMS has further developed its
MedServ product line of mobile computerized medication dispensing systems to
interface with the Performance Pharmacy System. The MedServ product line
consists of MedServ FS(TM) (inventory control of floor stocked items) and
MedServ EMAR(TM) (electronic charting of patients scheduled medications). The
Company believes it has developed a comprehensive solution to enhanced
documentation of medication use within the hospital environmental. The Company
is not aware of any other products that address this important healthcare need
with the same level of system integration. As a result of the Company's current
financial condition, the necessary capital to continue development of this
product might not be available and the Company is at risk of losing this unique
business opportunity.

On March 10, 1995, the Company established MTS Sales and Marketing, Inc.
("MTS Sales"). This subsidiary was established to provide administrative
support and services to the other subsidiaries.

The principal executive offices and manufacturing facilities of the
Company are located at 12920 Automobile Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 34622,
and its telephone number is (813) 576-6311.

Segments

The Company maintains two business segments, medication dispensing systems
and clinical laboratory services. MTS Packaging, MMS, Performance Pharmacy and
MTS Sales contribute to the revenues generated by the medication dispensing
systems business segment. MTL contributes to the clinical laboratory services
business segment revenues.

The following is operating information for these industry segments for the
years ended March 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
-------- ------- --------
(In Thousands, except Percentages)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue of each Segment:
Medication Dispensing Systems $ 11,900 $11,252 $ 9,018
Clinical Laboratory Services 5,152 3,578 3,283
-------- ------- -------
Total Revenue $ 17,052 $14,830 $12,301
======== ======= =======

Operating Profit (Loss) of each Segment:
Medication Dispensing Systems $(12,530) $ 347 $ 2,761
Clinical Laboratory Services (4,411) 307 985
-------- ------- -------
Total Operating Profit (Loss) $(16,941) $ 654 $ 3,746
======== ======= =======
</TABLE>

2
<PAGE> 5

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Depreciation and Amortization Expense of
each Segment:
Medication Dispensing Systems $ 2,103 $ 877 $ 657
Clinical Laboratory Services 579 183 161
------- ------- -------
Total Depreciation and Amortization $ 2,682 $ 1,060 $ 818
======= ======= =======

Identifiable Assets of each Segment:
Medication Dispensing systems $12,118 $26,611 $19,182
Clinical Laboratory Services 2,551 5,887 5,411
------- ------- -------
Total Assets $14,669 $32,498 $24,593
======= ======= =======

Capital Expenditures of each Segment:
Medication Dispensing Systems $ 795 $ 2,403 $ 2,442
Clinical Laboratory Services 2 600 581
------- ------- -------
Total Capital Expenditures $ 797 $ 3,003 $ 3,023
======= ======= =======

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
Medication Dispensing Systems $12,662 $ 3,471 $ -0-
Clinical Laboratory Services 3,759 800 -0-
------- ------- -------
$16,421 $ 4,271 $ -0-
======= ======= =======
Percentage of Revenue
Generated by Subsidiary:
MTS Packaging Systems, Inc. 63% 66% 63%
Medical Technology Laboratories, Inc. 30% 24% 27%
Medication Management Systems, Inc. 3% 4% 0%
Performance Pharmacy Systems, Inc. 4% 6% 10%
------- ------- -------
100% 100% 100%
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

Events Leading to the Company's Chapter 11 Filing

During the second quarter of fiscal 1996, the Company recorded losses and
write-downs which impacted its earnings. These adjustments included a $1.2
million charge relating to the obsolescence of an early version of its
computerized medication dispensing product and an additional charge of
approximately $500,000 relating to the valuation of certain inventory and
project development costs.

On November 21, 1995, Creighton terminated its relationship with the GPC
joint venture. The revenues attributable to the joint venture for the fiscal
years ending March 31, 1995 and 1996 were $258,000 and $1,127,000,
respectively. There were no revenues attributable to the joint venture during
the fiscal year ended March 31, 1994. The Company's interest in this joint
venture has been treated as a discontinued operation for financial reporting
purposes. As a result of the termination, the Company recorded a $4.6 million
write-off of its investment in GPC. In addition to the terminated joint venture
expense, the Company recorded a related valuation allowance in the amount of
approximately $505,000 on inventory carried in Vangard, which had been acquired
for the joint venture. As a direct result of the joint venture termination, the
Company re-evaluated its position in the medication packaging market. The
Company determined that the automated packaging equipment associated with the
core packaging business should be more fully utilized in order to remain
competitive. The early retirement of portions of the existing packaging
equipment resulted in a $3.0 million charge against earnings.

As a result of these significant losses, the Company was in violation of
certain financial covenants in borrowing agreements with its principal lenders.
The Company was unable to reach an agreement with its lenders to amend or
restructure the debt. The extended negotiations with the Company's lenders
created substantial uncertainty which led to management's decision to file for
protection under Chapter 11 ("Chapter 11") of Title 11 of the United States

3
<PAGE> 6

Bankruptcy Code in the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division (the
"Bankruptcy Court") for certain of its subsidiaries.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996, the Company filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 for four of its subsidiaries, MTS
Packaging, MTL, Vangard and MTS Sales (collectively, the "MTS debtors").
Trading of the Company's Common Stock on NASDAQ was discontinued on February 8,
1996 for failure to meet the requirements for continued inclusion in the
NASDAQ. On September 4, 1996, subsequent to the end of the fiscal period
covered by this report, the Bankruptcy Court approved a plan of reorganization
(the "Plan of Reorganization").

Because of the events described above, the Company's working capital and
borrowing capacity were extremely limited. The Company ultimately decided to
suspend most project development activities, incurring substantial write-offs
of the suspended project costs.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company
incurred losses during the current year of approximately $34.6 million and its
total liabilities exceeded its total assets by approximately $18.5 million as
of March 31, 1996. The Company also had negative cash flows from operations
during fiscal 1996 of approximately $0.9 million and loans in the amount of
approximately $29 million are past due. These conditions raised substantial
doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern as of March
31, 1996. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
resulting from the Bankruptcy Court's approved plan of reorganization.

Resolution of Claims

Schedules were filed with the Bankruptcy Court setting forth the assets
and liabilities of the MTS debtors as of the petition date. The ultimate amount
and settlement terms for any prepetition liabilities are subject to a plan of
reorganization (see "Plans of Reorganization" below).

Plans of Reorganization

Plans of reorganization for MTS Packaging and MTL were submitted to the
Bankruptcy Court on May 16, 1996. A plan of reorganization was submitted for
Vangard on July 15, 1996. As part of the Plan of Reorganization, the Bankruptcy
Court approved both plans of reorganization at a confirmation hearing on
September 4, 1996.

Inherent in a successful plan of reorganization is a capital structure
that permits a debtor to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its restructured
obligations and fund its current obligations. Under the Bankruptcy Code, the
rights of and ultimate payment to prepetition creditors and stockholders were
substantially altered.

In connection with the filings of the MTS debtors, the Company entered
into a Bankruptcy Court approved agreement with its lenders to permit continued
use of cash collateral, primarily accounts receivables and inventories, to
conduct its business. The Bankruptcy Court protection provided by the filings
for the MTS debtors allowed the resumption of normal business operations, which
have continued after confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization.

Products/Services

MTS Packaging manufactures proprietary medication dispensing systems and
related products for use by medication prescription service providers. These
systems utilize disposable medication punchcards and specialized machines that
automatically or semi-automatically assemble, fill and seal into medication
punchcard: 30, 60 or 90 tablets or capsules, representing a 30 day supply of a
patient's medication.

The Company's machinery for dispensing medication in disposable packages
automatically places tablets or capsules (the amount of medication required by
a patient during one month) into a blistered punchcard. The use of

4
<PAGE> 7

these cards and machines provides a cost effective customized package at
competitive prices. The punchcard medication dispensing system can provide
tamper evident packaging for products dispensed in the Company's package.

The retail price of the Company's medication packaging machinery ranges
from $650 to $120,000 depending upon the degree of automation and options
requested by a customer. The Company's punchcards typically sell from $155 to
$225 per 1,000 cards, depending upon the size, design, quality and volume of
cards ordered by a customer. To date, the Company has placed approximately 850
medication dispensing systems with pharmacy clientele. MTS Packaging also sells
prescription labels and medication carts. These products and ancillary supplies
are designed to complement sales of disposable medication punchcards.

Through MMS, the Company offers a proprietary computer-based pharmacy
management system for hospitals called Performance Pharmacy System. The primary
emphasis of this system is to provide the hospital pharmacist with a
comprehensive collection of automated tools for completing day-to-day
activities in an efficient manner. The system performs important medication
management responsibilities and sophisticated drug therapy monitoring and
documentation. The system also provides hospital pharmacists with the ability
to process physicians' medication orders quickly and accurately. The
organization of screens, use of overlapping windows, in-process access to
multiple files and other user friendly techniques makes the Performance
Pharmacy System an attractive and functional hospital pharmacy software system.
Performance Pharmacy System pricing starts at approximately $30,000 which
includes hardware, software, training and pre-loaded drug files. To date,
approximately 120 Performance Pharmacy Software Systems have been installed
with users. The Company believes that the market for such systems is favorable.
However, the Company has reduced the carrying value of such assets due to the
lack of financing and other uncertainties that might preclude further
development of the system.

Also within MMS, the Company has developed the MedServ product line which
consists of MedServ FS (inventory control of floor stocked items) and MedServ
EMAR (electric charting of patients scheduled medications). The MedServ
Medication Cart has been specifically designed for use in hospital and nursing
home facilities. With its unique hardware and customized software programs, the
MedServ system objective is to introduce controls and audit trails to reduce
the likelihood of medication errors while helping to provide high levels of
security within the hospital. This mobile computer based system automatically
logs all activity and allows integration with existing information systems. As
nurses make rounds, the MedServ Cart moves with them providing finger tip
"touch screen" access to vital patient and prescription information. The
benefits include accurate patient billing, reduced probability of missed
dosages and medication errors, and adherence to pharmacy and nursing drug
administration policies. Further benefits include improved drug accountability,
curtailed pilferage and better inventory control through "proof-of-use"
management. It also supports the clinical pharmacist's activities by
identifying dosing compliance.

Currently, the MedServ FS product has not been made widely available to
the healthcare industry. MedServ FS has been installed in 14 hospitals, and the
MedServ EMAR system is due to be installed in fiscal year 1997. The continued
development of MedServ EMAR contemplates a successful reorganization of the
Company and the availability of capital.

Vangard, now identified as a discontinued operation for financial
reporting purposes, bought generic drugs (including analgesics,
anti-arthritics, antibiotics, cardiovascular, laxatives, nutritionals and
psychotropics) from leading manufacturers of generic drugs. The drugs were
repackaged predominantly in a unit-dose format and sold to wholesalers. These
pharmaceutical products were, in turn, resold to individual hospitals and
nursing home pharmacies.

MTL provides clinical laboratory testing services. The analytical tests
that it provides are typical of diagnostic laboratories and the facilities
presently have no particular specialization in any of its testing procedures
and services. This Company performs in-house over 95% of the testing routinely
ordered by physicians for their patients, which typically includes chemistry,
hematology, serology, urinalysis and bacteriology.

5
<PAGE> 8

Research and Development

Research and development activities during the past three years have not
been significant and, therefore, have not been separately classified in the
financial statements. The Company has dedicated substantially all of its
resources to the development of products that have been determined to be
technologically feasible in an effort to realize a return on the investment
made as quickly as possible.

Product Development

The Company had a significant number of projects underway to develop new
products during fiscal year 1996. These projects were primarily being developed
within the medication dispensing system business segment. The most significant
projects were as follows:

Performance Pharmacy Systems, Inc.
Performance Pharmacy Windows Based Software Systems
Medication Management Systems, Inc.
MedServe EMAR
MTS Packaging Systems, Inc.
Approximately 12 new punchcard packaging and dispensing systems

Due to the uncertainties surrounding the Company's financial condition,
and its ability to attract and retain qualified employees, the completion of
these projects is in doubt.

Management is currently implementing the Plan of Reorganization which was
approved by the Bankruptcy Court. If and when profitable operations are
restored, the Company intends to utilize the cash generated from operations to
assist in the further development of its products.

The amount of capital required to complete these projects is significant.
The Company's ability to obtain capital from sources outside of cash generated
from operations is contingent in part on its ability to exhibit a return to
profitability on a consistent basis.

The Company's inability to complete these projects may have a material
impact on its ability to remain competitive and could have a significant impact
on its future operations.

The Company has continued to develop the Performance Pharmacy System
with a limited staff of programmers. The MedServe EMAR system is currently in
the testing phase and is not being marketed. It is anticipated that at least
one trial installation will be made within fiscal 1997. The cost of further
development of Pharmacy and EMAR systems may be significant and is partly
dependent on the results of the testing sites.

The punchcard packaging systems may require substantial additional
investment. As each product becomes marketable, the Company will evaluate the
amount of capital required to successfully market them. The additional costs to
do so may be significant.

6
<PAGE> 9

Manufacturing Processes

MTS Packaging has developed an integrated punchcard assembly machine which
will accomplish the various punchcard manufacturing steps in a single-line,
automated process. The Company believes that its advanced automation gives it
certain speed, cost and flexibility advantages over conventional punchcard
manufacturers. The Company's equipment produces finished cards in one eight
hour shift that previously took one week using conventional methods. This
represents a substantial reduction in time over conventional punchcard
manufacturing systems. The Company has two machines capable of producing
punchcards in this manner. In addition to the manufacturing of punchcards, this
subsidiary manufactures machines, which are utilized by its customers to fill
punchcards with medication. The majority of these machines are sold to
customers; however, from time to time, customers are provided or rented
machines in conjunction with an agreement to purchase certain quantities of
punchcards over a specified time period.

During 1996, the Company disposed of all production equipment and tooling
it no longer was utilizing in its manufacturing processes due to the exclusive
use of automated equipment resulting in a charge of $8.3 million. The Company
uses automated fabrication equipment to produce its medication packaging
machinery. All essential components of the machines are manufactured by the
Company without reliance on outside vendors.

MTS Packaging is dependent on the number of suppliers for the raw
materials and distribution essential in the production of its products. The
Company believes that relations are adequate with its existing vendors.
However, there can be no assurance that such relations will be adequate in the
future or that shortages of any of these raw materials will not arise, causing
production delays. The inability to obtain raw materials on a timely basis and
on acceptable terms may have an impact on the future performance of the
Company.

MMS integrates computer hardware into its MedServ mobile medication carts
and then installs its proprietary software. All hardware is purchased from
outside vendors but is common to many suppliers. The Company believes its
proprietary software adds substantial value to the product, primarily because
of the Company's extensive knowledge of hospital pharmacy management practices
derived from the more than 120 installations of its Performance Pharmacy
Systems.

MTL primarily relies upon sophisticated diagnostic testing equipment to
evaluate bodily fluid samples. The Company has upgraded its laboratory
equipment through the acquisition of automated analyzers. Each analyzer is
capable of performing 36 different tests on up to 160 patients per hour. The
testing categories performed by such machinery include bacteriology, chemistry,
hematology, serology and urinalysis. This laboratory subsidiary provides
services and as a result, is not dependent upon a supply of raw materials;
however, certain disposable supplies are utilized to perform services. Revenue
derived from services is dependent upon referrals by physicians.

Performance Pharmacy develops and sells software systems. This subsidiary
is not dependent upon a supply of raw materials; however, the development and
software support services provided are dependent upon the subsidiary's ability
to attract and retain qualified personnel who are experienced in computer
software matters.

As a result of the Company's financial condition, as well as the Chapter
11 filings of the MTS debtors, many of the suppliers of raw materials to the
Company's subsidiaries have required that purchases be made on a COD basis or
payment in advance. The Company's ability to obtain raw materials is,
therefore, dependent upon the amount of cash that the Company has available.

MTS Packaging is required to maintain an inventory of materials and
finished products which allows for customer orders to be shipped within the
industry standard of 10 - 15 days.

MMS maintains an inventory of raw materials, which are assembled at the
time an order is received from customers. Systems are made to order;
accordingly, raw materials are ordered when needed. The Company believes this
is standard in the industry.

7
<PAGE> 10

The services provided by MTL and Performance Pharmacy do not require these
companies to maintain inventory.

Markets and Customers

MTS Packaging's products are sold throughout the United States, primarily
through its sales organization and independent sales representatives. The
Company also participates in trade shows and training seminars. Although the
Company has been able to market its products, there is no assurance that its
sales efforts will continue to be successful.

The primary customers for MTS Packaging's proprietary packaging machinery
and the related disposable punchcards, labels and ancillary supplies are
pharmacies that supply prescription medication to nursing homes. Such
pharmacies generally serve from 250 to 5,000 nursing home beds per location and
many serve the home health care marketplace as well.

The Company has begun commercializing its MedServ product line, which is a
mobile computerized medication dispensing system, to hospitals throughout the
United States. This technology is attractive to hospitals because it provides
the opportunity for the hospital to reduce medication dispensing and
administration errors. Approximately 2,000 of the more than 6,000 acute care
and specialty care hospitals throughout the United States currently have
computerized medication dispensing systems. Most of those 2,000 hospitals
utilize floor stock systems for inventory control in primarily the emergency
room, operating room or in areas where narcotic floor stock was previously
stored. Thus, there is an opportunity within most of those 2,000 hospitals for
systems, such as the Company's MedServ EMAR, that can adequately handle a
patient's regularly scheduled medications. The systems that have been installed
are primarily justified by reducing inventory shortages and decreasing "lost
billings" rather than reducing or eliminating medication errors. As of July 1,
1996, the Company had 14 MedServ hospital installations within the U.S. The
Company anticipates that pricing for MedServ products will range from $25,000
to $500,000 for a hospital installation depending on the number of beds and
service level requirements. The Company believes that the market for such
systems is favorable. However, the Company has reduced the carrying value of
such assets due to the lack of financing and other uncertainties that might
preclude further development of the product line.

The Company believes that as more nursing home and hospital pharmacy
providers learn of the cost effectiveness of the Company's medication
dispensing and information systems, the number of nursing home and hospital
pharmacies using these systems will continue to increase, although there can be
no assurance of any such increase.

The additional markets for other assisted care facilities, such as
sub-acute care and assisted living facilities, are relatively new. Although the
Company has no specific data for these markets, it believes that the extension
of the health care market from nursing homes and hospitals into sub-acute care,
assisted living facilities and other health care facilities represents a
potential to expand the customer base for its products. Although the Company is
optimistic that it will be able to generate additional revenues from the
growing assisted care facilities market, there is no assurance that it can
significantly penetrate such markets.

The primary market and customers for the services offered by MTL are
doctors and hospitals in the State of Florida.

The Company presently has no customers that account for greater than 10%
of its consolidated sales.

Competition

The pharmacies that supply prescription medicines to nursing homes and
hospitals are the primary market for the Company's products. This market is
highly competitive. There are several competitors that presently market other
systems utilizing punchcards. The Company believes it is the industry leader in
the automation of packaging and sealing of solid medications into punchcards.
The products developed by the Company's competitors are not as

8
<PAGE> 11

efficient as the Company's systems because they are not as automated. The
Company's method of dispensing medication replaces more traditional dispensing
methods such as prescription vials. The principal methods of competition in
supplying medication dispensing systems to prescription service providers are
price, customization and product performance. Many of the Company's competitors
have been in business longer and have substantially greater resources than the
Company. The Company's medication dispensing systems are relatively new and
there is no assurance that the Company will be able to compete effectively with
traditional methods of dispensing medication or other punchcard systems.

The Company's primary competitors for medication dispensing systems are
Drug Package, Inc., PCI/Trans Aid, Inc. and RX Systems, Inc. The Company
believes that its automated proprietary packaging machinery distinguishes MTS
Packaging from its competitors' manual systems which are capable of only
filling and sealing 30-45 disposable medication punchcards per hour. The
Company's new automated packaging machinery can fill and seal up to 600
disposable medication cards per hour.

Vangard, which has been identified as a discontinued business unit held
for sale, has faced competition from numerous packagers of generic oral solid
unit dose medications for hospitals and nursing homes. This market is highly
competitive and includes companies such as Schein, Inc., UDL, Inc.,
Zenith/Goldline, Inc., Roxanne Corp. and Medirex, Inc. The principal methods of
competition for unit dose repackagers are price, quality of product and
reputation. Vangard had numerous competitors who had been in business longer
and had greater financial and marketing resources.

MMS faces intense competition within the hospital marketplace for both its
Performance Pharmacy management systems and its MedServ products. For pharmacy
management systems, competitors include dominant hospital information system
vendors such as HBO & Company, SMS Corporation, MEDITECH, Inc. and other such
major corporations. Also included are pharmacy management systems providers
such as Megasource, Inc., Cerner Corporation, Continental Healthcare Systems,
Inc. and Health Care Services, Inc. Among suppliers of automated dispensing
systems to hospitals, the Company will be competing with such major companies
as Pyxis Corporation, Baxter International, Inc., Diebold Incorporated and
others for its new MedServ product line. Although the Company believes it
provides superior technological systems, there is no assurance that it will be
able to effectively compete with companies that have more financial resources
or established market distribution channels.

MTL conducts its business in a very competitive marketplace. There are a
number of diagnostics laboratories in the Tampa Bay area that compete with the
Company's facilities. In addition, hospitals are offering their own diagnostic
clinical laboratory services which places additional competitive pressure on
the Company. Although management of MTL believes it provides a high level of
service and quality, there can be no assurance that competitors, governmental
regulators, or reductions in Medicare reimbursement rates will not erode its
business prospects.

Proprietary Technology

The Siegel Family QTIP Trust (the "Trust") is the holder of certain
patents and other proprietary rights for the equipment and processes that MTS
Packaging uses and sells. The Trust is the assignee of all such proprietary and
patent rights used in the Company's business that were invented or developed by
Harold B. Siegel, the founder of the Company. The Trust and the Company are
parties to a license agreement whereby the Company is granted an exclusive and
perpetual license from the Trust to utilize the know-how and patent rights in
the manufacture and sale of the Company's medication dispensing systems. MTS
Packaging is heavily dependent upon the continued use of the proprietary rights
associated with these patents. The patents begin to expire in 2001 and continue
to expire through 2006. The license agreements are co-extensive with the
patents.

There are numerous patent applications and patent license agreements for
products that have been sold and that have been in development within MMS;
however, its business is not materially dependent upon its ownership of any one
patent or group of patents.

9
<PAGE> 12

There is no assurance that any additional patents will be granted with
respect to the Company's medication dispensing or information systems and
products or that any patent issued, or that may be issued in the future, will
ultimately provide meaningful protection from competition.

MTL does not presently benefit from any proprietary technology. The
Company has completed a program to upgrade to more technologically advanced
equipment, its analytical services and the delivery of diagnostic information
to its customers.

Regulation

MTS Packaging's products are governed by federal regulations concerning
components of packaging materials which are in contact with food. The Company
has obtained assurances from its vendors that the packaging materials used by
the Company are in conformity with such regulations. However, there can be no
assurance that significant changes in the regulations applicable to MTS
Packaging's products will not occur in the foreseeable future. Any such changes
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The operations of MTL are subject to extensive federal, state, and local
regulation. Specifically, MTL is licensed by the State of Florida Department of
Health and Rehabilitation Services ("HRS") and is certified by the Health Care
Financial Administration ("HCFA"), a federal governmental agency. The Company
believes MTL is operated in compliance with HRS and HCFA licensing and
certification requirements.

The operations of MTL are subject to Medicare reimbursement requirements
and restrictions imposed by the Social Security Act as administered by HCFA.
Recent regulatory changes directly affect the way Medicare reimburses for
laboratory services. Commencing September 1, 1992, Medicare no longer pays for
laboratory services unless the lab facility is certified under the Clinical
Laboratory Improvement Act of 1988. The Company's operation of MTL complies
with this federal legislation.

Most clinical laboratory procedures are paid from laboratory fee schedules
issued by individual Medicare carriers or intermediaries. Since January 1,
1992, laboratory services have been paid based upon a national fee schedule
modified by local economic factors. Medicare carriers pay laboratory claims on
a reasonable fee basis. In the case of laboratory tests, the recommended fee is
the lesser of the fee schedule, or the national caps on the actual billed
amounts. Most laboratory tests must be billed on an assigned basis. This means
that the provider must accept the Medicare reimbursement as payment in full for
a laboratory test. Medicare patients are not billed for the additional amount.
In addition, the State of Florida has adopted legislation which limits billing
for laboratory services to 120% of the allowable Medicare reimbursement.

The operations of Vangard (treated as discontinued for reporting purposes)
were subject to the Good Manufacturing Practice regulations promulgated by the
FDA as codified in 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211. The operations of Vangard were
also subject to field inspections by regional offices of the FDA and DEA for
compliance with regulations dealing with drug manufacturers. The Company
believes it has instituted sufficient quality control procedures and has taken
such other steps so as to be in compliance with FDA and DEA regulations and
requirements as currently in effect. The Company is currently in compliance
with applicable FDA and DEA regulations.

It is impossible for the Company to predict the extent to which its
operations will be effected under the laws and regulations described above or
any new regulations which may be adopted by regulatory agencies.

Employees

As of July 1, 1996, the Company employed 197 persons full time, including
30 at Vangard. None of the Company's employees are covered by a collective
bargaining agreement.

10
<PAGE> 13

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company leases a 62,000 square foot plant consisting of office space
and air-conditioned manufacturing and warehousing space near the Clearwater/St.
Petersburg International Airport at 12920 Automobile Boulevard. The Company's
corporate administrative and marketing offices, MMS and Performance Pharmacy
and the manufacturing facilities for MTS Packaging are located at this address.
The lease had an initial term of five years commencing on April 1, 1987 and now
expires on April 15, 1999. The Company's current monthly lease payments are
approximately $21,000. Due to reductions in personnel, which were made by the
Company in connection with the Chapter 11 filings, the amount of space required
by the Company was less than the amount of space leased. The premises are
generally suited for light manufacturing and/or distribution. The landlord
agreed to decrease the space leased by 20% to approximately 50,000 square feet.
Currently, the Company is operating at two-thirds of actual capacity.

The Company leases approximately 5,200 square feet at approximately $2,500
per month for office and warehouse space at 21530 Drake Road, Cleveland, Ohio.
This space is used by the Ohio Label business acquired by the Company in 1989.
This business is now part of MTS Packaging.

The Company leases approximately 3,300 square feet of space for MTL
located in Pinellas County, Florida. This lease expires on April 1, 1997, with
monthly rents not in excess of $5,046.

In connection with the ownership of Vangard, the Company owns two
buildings in Glasgow, Kentucky, which are used for administration and
warehousing. These facilities, together with a leased building used for
manufacturing, contain approximately 46,000 square feet. The monthly payments
for the Vangard leased facilities are approximately $3,950. The Company agreed
to assume certain obligations related to this property from Owens and Minor,
Inc., an unrelated third party, from whom the Company purchased Vangard. The
obligations include a promissory note payable to the City of Glasgow with an
unpaid balance of approximately $284,000 at the time the obligation was
assumed, with a 3% interest rate and monthly payments of approximately $2,400.
As security for this note, the Company granted a first mortgage on the Vangard
real estate.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company was not involved in any litigation which, in the opinion of
management, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position. As more fully described in the last paragraph of Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company is disputing a proposed
assessment by the State of Florida, Department of Revenue.

On January 3, 1996, three of the Company's subsidiaries, MTS Packaging,
MTL and MTS Sales, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 in the
United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division. On February 22, 1996, Vangard filed
a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 in the same court.

On September 4, 1996, the Plan of Reorganization for the MTS debtors was
confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court. As a part of the Plan of Reorganization for
the MTS debtors, certain liabilities have been compromised by creditors of the
Company as follows:

Secured Claims (Bank) - Bank notes payable to SouthTrust (the "Bank"),
line of credit, accrued interest and other charges and expenses, in the amount
of approximately $28.0 million, have been combined and restructured into two
separate promissory notes ("Plan Note I" and "Plan Note II").

Plan Note I, in the stated principal amount of approximately $27.0
million, provides for a portion of the principal amount, $15.0 million, to be
due and payable as follows:

a) Interest at the rate of 7.5% for a period of (2) years ending
September 1, 1998.

11
<PAGE> 14

b) Installments of principal and interest at the rate of 7.5% payable
monthly for a period of ten years ending September 1, 2006. At which time, the
then outstanding principal amount is due and payable in full. The monthly
installments of principal and interest are calculated based on the principal
amount amortized in level monthly payments over twenty years.

Plan Note I further provides that the net sales proceeds from the sale of
one of the MTS debtors, Vangard, will be paid to the Bank. In addition, certain
other mandatory prepayments of the stated principal amount are required upon
the occurrence of a capital transaction in which any of the Company's
subsidiaries are sold, as well as upon the receipt of any proceeds resulting
from certain causes of action commenced by the Company. Plan Note I also
provides that the full stated principal amount shall be due and payable upon
the occurrence of specified major events of default.

Plan Note II, in the stated principal amount of $1,000,000 provided for
payment of $750,000 on or about the date of the confirmation of the Plan of
Reorganization of the MTS debtors. The Company made the payment of $750,000 on
or about September 5, 1996 and in accordance with the terms of Plan Note II,
the stated principal amount was deemed fully satisfied. The repayment of Plan
Notes I and II is guaranteed personally by Todd E. Siegel.

As noted above, there exists the possibility that additional prepayments
and payments will be made towards the bank debt. At present, the quantification
of these amounts, if any, cannot be determined. The amount of debt forgiveness
currently recognizable cannot be determined until any additional payments, if
any, are known and it is determined to be highly unlikely that certain events
of default, as defined in the amended and restated loan agreement, will occur.
In addition, no amounts of interest expense will be recorded until it is
determined that the principal payments, the additional prepayments and the
interest payments in the aggregate exceed the carrying value of the Company's
bank debt.

Unsecured Claims (Trade Creditors) - The holders of approximately
$2,300,000 of trade and other miscellaneous claims elected to receive payment
of their claims under one of the three options which were provided for in the
plans of reorganization.

Unsecured Claims (Other) - In March 1995, the Company entered into an
agreement relating to the acquisition of certain clinical laboratory accounts
for MTL. The Company reached a compromise with the seller, which reduced the
acquisition indebtedness to $500,000.

The adjustment of unsecured claims resulted in a reduction of the amount
of these claims in the amount of $2,441,000. This amount has been classified as
an extraordinary gain in the Company's consolidated statement of operations and
statement of cash flow for the six months ended September 30, 1996.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

12
<PAGE> 15

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS

The authorized capital stock consists of 25,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, $.01 par value ("Common Stock"), and 7,500,000 shares of Preferred
Stock, $0.0001 par value ("Voting Preferred Stock"), issuable in series. On
January 6, 1992, the Company declared a reverse 1 for 4 split of its Common
Stock to obtain entry into the NASDAQ-NMS. Trading of the Company's Common
Stock on NASDAQ was discontinued on February 9, 1996 for failure to meet the
requirements for continued inclusion in the NASDAQ.

Common Stock

Holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on
all matters to be voted on by stockholders, including the election of
directors. There is no right to cumulate votes in the election of directors.
However, Todd E. Siegel through the JADE Partnership (the "Partnership") and
the Trust, which maintains ownership of the Voting Preferred Stock, controls
the affairs of the Company, including the election of directors. The holders of
Common Stock are entitled, upon liquidation or dissolution of the Company, to
receive pro rata all assets remaining available for distribution to
stockholders after payment of $10,000 to the holders of the Preferred Stock.
The Common Stock has no preemptive or other subscription rights, and there are
no conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to
such shares. All the outstanding shares of Common Stock, are validly issued,
fully paid and non-assessable.

The holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive such dividends, if
any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors, at its
discretion, from such funds as are legally available. The Company's financing
agreements include restrictions on the payment of dividends. The Company has
never paid cash dividends on its Common Stock, however, and it currently
intends to retain all earnings for use in its business. Accordingly, it is
anticipated that no dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future. During
1996, an Employee Stock Purchase Plan was initiated which provided
approximately $400,000 in equity with a corresponding expense in exchange for
the issuance of approximately 1.4 million of the 2 million shares of Common
Stock reserved for this plan.

As of July 1, 1996, there were approximately 1,300 registered holders of
the common shares of the Company's outstanding Common Stock.

Preferred Stock

The Company has outstanding 6,500,000 shares of Voting Preferred Stock,
all of which are held by the Partnership. The Voting Preferred Stock has the
right to cast two votes per share on each and any matter on which the Common
Stock is entitled to vote. In addition to preferential voting rights, the
Voting Preferred Stock is entitled to receive upon dissolution or liquidation
of the Company, the first $10,000 of proceeds distributed to stockholders of
the Company upon such events. Thereafter, the Voting Preferred Stock is
entitled to no additional amounts upon dissolution or liquidation of the
Company. The Voting Preferred Stock has no dividend rights, redemption
provisions, sinking fund provisions or conversion, or preemptive or exchange
rights. The Voting Preferred Stock issued to the Partnership is not subject to
further calls or assessments by the Company.

Options

Four hundred thousand shares of Common Stock are reserved for issuance to
employees under the Company's Employee Stock Option Plan. Of these options
80,484, at various prices, which range from $4.00 to $10.00 per share, were
outstanding at March 31, 1996.

13
<PAGE> 16

During fiscal year 1996, options to acquire 59,000 shares of Common Stock
at an exercise price of $1.63 were issued to certain officers, directors, and
former directors of the Company.

As of March 31, 1996, approximately 320,250 options, at $1.63 per share,
were outstanding and held by certain officers, directors, and former directors
of the Company.

The options currently outstanding expire on various dates commencing in
April 1998 and ending in March 2006.

Warrants

The Company has 1,200,000 outstanding warrants exercisable to purchase one
share of Common Stock at $7.00 per share that were issued in connection with
its July 1991 public offering. In addition, the Company has 120,000 outstanding
warrants that were issued to the underwriter of the July 1991 offering,
exercisable to purchase one share of Common Stock at $7.00 per share. These
warrants were originally to expire on July 9, 1996, but have been extended to
July 17, 1997. These warrants are callable by the Company, upon 30 days'
written notice, at $.05 per warrant.

The above warrants contain anti-dilution provisions providing for
adjustment of the exercise price upon the occurrence of certain events,
including the issuance of any Common Stock or other securities convertible into
or exercisable for Common Stock at a price per share less than the exercise
price, or in the event of any recapitalization, reclassification, stock
dividend, stock split, stock combination or similar transaction. The
outstanding warrants do not confer upon the holders thereof any voting
preemptive rights, or any other rights of the shareholders of the Company.

Reports to Stockholders

The Company will furnish its stockholders with annual reports containing
audited financial statements that have been examined and reported on by
independent certified public accountants and quarterly reports for the first
three quarters of each fiscal year containing unaudited financial statements.

Transfer Agent And Warrant Agent

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York, is the
registrar and transfer agent for all of the Company's securities.

14
<PAGE> 17

Price Range of the Company's Securities

Prior to February 9, 1996, the Company's Common shares traded on the
NASDAQ National Market. Trading of the Company's Common Stock on NASDAQ was
discontinued on February 9, 1996 for failure to meet the requirements for
continued inclusion in the NASDAQ. Since that time, the Company's Common Stock
has traded on the over-the-counter market. The table below sets forth the range
of high and low sale prices for the Company's Common Shares for the period
indicated, as reported by NASDAQ quotation system for each quarter through the
third quarter of fiscal year 1996 and by the NASD OTC Bulletin Board for the
fourth quarter of 1996. Over-the-counter market quotations reflect interdealer
prices without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not necessarily
represent actual transactions.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
High Low
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
1995 Fiscal Year
First Quarter 9 1/4 7 5/8
Second Quarter 8 1/8 6 5/8
Third Quarter 7 3/8 5 1/2
Fourth Quarter 7 3/4 5 1/8

1996 Fiscal Year
First Quarter 9 1/8 4 5/8
Second Quarter 6 1/16 4 5/8
Third Quarter 6 3/4
Fourth Quarter 1 3/16 3/16
</TABLE>

The table below sets forth the range of high and low sales prices for the
Company's warrants for the period indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

High Low
------ -----
<S> <C> <C>
1995 Fiscal Year
First Quarter 3 5/16 2 1/4
Second Quarter 2 5/8 1 11/16
Third Quarter 2 1/4 1 1/4
Fourth Quarter 2 1/2 1 5/16

1996 Fiscal Year
First Quarter 3 7/8
Second Quarter 1 1/2 11/16
Third Quarter 1 1/8 1/32
Fourth Quarter 1/32 1/32
</TABLE>

Historically, the Company has not paid dividends on its Common Stock and
has no present intention of paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment
of dividends are subject to the prior approval by the Company's secured lender,
SouthTrust Bank.

15
<PAGE> 18

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables set forth selected financial and operating data
regarding the Company. This information should be read in conjunction with
"MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS" and the Company's Financial Statements and Notes thereto. See
"FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
(In Thousands, Except Earnings Per Share Amounts)
Income Statement Data: 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- - - - --------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 17,052 $14,830 $12,301 $10,858 $ 7,500
Cost of Sales and Other Expenses. . . . . . . . . 41,669 16,946 9,367 8,052 5,185
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change . (22,717) (1,272) 1,856 1,740 1,476
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations. . . . (6,634) 16 762 552 -0-
Estimated Loss on Disposal of Discontinued
Operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5,229) -0- -0- -0- -0-
Cumulative Effect of Accounting
Change for FASB No. 109 . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- -0- 543 -0- -0-
Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (34,580) (1,256) 3,161 2,292 1,476
Primary Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
From Continuing Operations. . . . . . . . . . . (5.60) (.32) .48 .46 .45
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations. . . . (2.92) .00 .20 .15 .00
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
For FASB No. 109. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .00 .00 .14 .00 .00
-------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share $ (8.52) $ (0.32) $ .82 $ .61 $ .45
======== ======= ======= ======= =======

Average Common Shares and Common Share
Equivalents Outstanding* 4,059 3,974 3,879 3,789 3,306
</TABLE>

* No dividends were declared or paid during periods presented.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT MARCH 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
(In Thousands)
Balance Sheet Data: 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- - - - --------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Working Capital* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,406 $ 5,410 $ 1,695 $ 1,899 $ 513
Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,669 44,243 33,018 25,527 17,217
Short-Term Debt* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 1,165 979 654 1,658
Long-Term Debt* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 23,224 10,588 7,227 1,541
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) . . . . . . . . . (18,546) 15,640 16,853 13,655 10,487
</TABLE>

* Excluding liabilities subject to compromise of $30,457 in 1996.

16
<PAGE> 19

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

During fiscal year 1996, operating losses and limited working capital
necessitated a thorough review of all operations and an assessment of the
carrying value of all assets. Stringent measures were taken in the fourth
quarter to preserve the Company's assets and core businesses. Management
believes that the ultimate result will be a profitable and growing company
refocused on its core businesses.

As described below, during the fourth quarter, the Company's principal
operating subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court approved the plan of
reorganization on September 4, 1996. The Company's intent in such filings was a
reorganization of its underlying businesses, the restructuring of indebtedness
with its principal lenders and protection of interests of its stockholders.

CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION

During fiscal year 1996, the Company experienced disappointing operating
results from its new MedServ product and operating losses at Vangard. On
January 4, 1996, the Company received notice from its lenders that its failure
to make a scheduled mandatory principal amortization and interest payment of
approximately $307,000 on December 5, 1995 was an event of default under its
credit agreement.

On January 3, 1996, three of the Company's subsidiaries, MTS Packaging,
MTL and MTS Sales, filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11. At that time,
the Company also suspended production operations at Vangard to avert further
operating losses.

On February 22, 1996, a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 was filed for
Vangard. Vangard is presented as a discontinued operation in the consolidated
financial statements of the Company. It is the intent of management, with the
cooperation of its lenders, to sell the Vangard assets and use the proceeds to
retire debt. The GPC joint venture was highly dependent upon the production
capability of Vangard to manufacture, package and distribute medication cards
filled with pharmaceuticals to long-term care pharmacy and other health care
facilities. MedCard was the pre-filled medication card provided through this
joint venture with Creighton. The marketing and distribution of MedCard to the
long-term care industry began in fiscal year 1995. The significant expansion
anticipated in 1996 did not materialize when Creighton withdrew its support
from this joint venture. This event necessitated a reappraisal of the carrying
costs of this venture and an assessment of its viability. Divesting Vangard
makes the viability of GPC tenuous, accordingly, it also is treated as a
discontinued operation.

The Company determined that it was prudent to consider the impact of the
bankruptcy filings and the unavailability of additional funding on the
realization of the carrying values of its assets. Management has decided to
reduce the carrying value of its joint venture, inventory, goodwill, project
development and fixed assets. The Company assessed the carrying values of these
assets in accordance with the recently enacted FASB No. 121 and adjusted them
based upon the estimated future discounted cash flow to be derived from them.
The result was a write-off of more than $23.5 million which included a $5.2
million investment in joint ventures and Vangard, $4.6 million in project
development costs, $8.3 million in fixed asset revaluations, $2.9 million in
goodwill, $1.5 million in inventory revaluation to the lower of cost or market,
and $1.0 million in other charges. These substantial adjustments had a
significant negative impact on the Company's operating results for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1996.

17
<PAGE> 20

Secured Claims (Bank) - Bank notes payable, line of credit, accrued
interest and other charges and expenses, in the amount of approximately $28.0
million, have been combined and restructured into two separate promissory
notes.

Plan Note I, in the stated principal amount of approximately $27.0
million, provides for a portion of the principal amount, $15.0 million, to be
due and payable as follows:

a) Interest at the rate of 7.5% for a period of (2) years ending
September 1, 1998.

Unsecured Claims (Other) - In March 1995, the Company entered into an
agreement relating to the acquisition of certain clinical laboratory accounts
for MTL. The Company reached a compromise with the seller which reduced the
acquisition indebtedness to $500,000.

18
<PAGE> 21

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 1996 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR 1995

During the second and third quarters of fiscal year 1996, the Company
incurred significant operating losses, which resulted primarily from
expenditures for personnel and services which the Company made for each of its
subsidiaries in anticipation of a growth in revenue. As a result of these
losses, the Company's ability to meet its financial obligations as they became
due was adversely affected. In addition, certain product development projects
had been undertaken which were funded entirely with bank borrowings, which
required substantial debt service payments. The Company began to delay
payments, where possible, to its suppliers and vigorously attempted to expedite
payments from its customers. In addition, in order to conserve cash, the
Company requested that its employees take a voluntary reduction in compensation
in exchange for receiving shares of Common Stock in the Company at a later
date. Also, certain officers of the Company elected not to be paid amounts to
which they were entitled according to their employment agreements.

Additionally, on June 15, 1996, the Company entered into a Severance
Agreement with its former Chief Financial Officer, Gerald Couture. As part of
that agreement, the Company acknowledged that it owed Mr. Couture past-due
compensation in the amount of $32,789. Pursuant to the Severance Agreement, the
parties agreed that the Company would deliver to Mr. Couture furniture valued
at $4,886 in partial settlement of the past-due compensation. Additionally, the
Company paid Mr. Couture $14,883 and applied $13,000 against amounts Mr.
Couture owed to the Company to fully satisfy the past due compensation
obligation. The Company also agreed to pay Mr. Couture severance compensation
in the amount of $450,000, payable in sum certain amounts through June 16,
1998. The Company, in its sole discretion, has the option of paying such
severance compensation in Common Stock of the Company.

The consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis
that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of
assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.
Subsequent to the MTS debtors filing petitions for relief under Chapter 11, the
Bankruptcy Court approved an agreement between the Company and its lenders that
permits the Company to continue to use cash collateral, primarily accounts
receivable and inventories, to conduct its business. The Bankruptcy Court
protection provided by the filings for the MTS debtors allowed the resumption
of normal business operations.

Revenues

Net sales for continuing operations for the fiscal year ending March 31,
1996 increased 15% to $17.1 million from $14.8 million in the prior fiscal
year. The increase was primarily attributable to a 44% increase in revenues
experienced by the clinical laboratory business segment which resulted from
improved sales and marketing efforts, as well as the acquisition of additional
accounts from Tampa Pathology Laboratory. The Company's medication dispensing
system business segment experienced a 6% increase in revenue primarily as a
result of the Company's decision to focus its sales and marketing efforts
through the wholesale distribution channel.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1996, increased 37% to
$10.7 million from $7.8 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily
due to increased revenues experienced by both the clinical laboratory and
medication dispensing business segments. Cost of sales, as a percentage of
sales increased from 52% in fiscal year 1995 to 62% in fiscal year 1996. Cost
of sales for the clinical laboratory segments increased to 62.8% in 1996 from
47.9% the prior year. The costs incurred by the clinical laboratory relating to
the testing of patient specimens which are performed by outside contractors, as
well as the operating costs of the patient service centers, increased in fiscal
year 1996. The clinical laboratory was not able to pass on these additional
costs to the insurance providers, primarily Medicare. In addition, the cost of
manufacturing punchcards and medication dispensing systems increased due to
increases in raw material and labor costs. The cost of sales increased 62% from
53.8% for this segment.

19
<PAGE> 22

Sales, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A")

SG&A expenses for the year ended March 31, 1996, increased to $8.5 million
from $2.4 million in the prior year. The increase in revenue experienced by the
clinical laboratory resulted in a significant increase in the number of patient
specimens processed. The increase in specimens required additional personnel to
process and bill for the services provided. In addition, the increased sales
and marketing efforts resulted in additional costs and expenses. The increase
in SG&A expenses for this business segment was approximately $1.1 million.

During the first and second quarters of fiscal year 1996, the Company
added administrative and sales personnel to accommodate anticipated growth in
its medication dispensing system business segment. The increase in SG&A
expenses for this business segment was approximately $3.2 million. Also,
additions were made in the staff and information systems of the holding company
to improve the administrative, accounting, and information support systems. The
increase in SG&A expenses for the holding company was $1.2 million. In
addition, the Company incurred one-time charges for severance and related
employee separation costs of approximately $0.6 million.

Product Development

Due to the uncertainties surrounding the Company's financial condition,
the filing of Chapter 11, the ultimate outcome of the plan of reorganization,
and its ability to attract and obtain qualified employees, the completion of
these projects is in doubt.

The Company's inability to complete these projects may have a material
impact on its ability to remain competitive and could have a significant impact
on its future operations.

The impact on the future operations of the Company and its inability to
complete these projects may be significant. The projects related to
Performance Pharmacy and MMS form the core of these businesses. The projects
related to the development of new dispensing systems and machines are critical
to allowing MTS Packaging to keep pace with its competitors.

20
<PAGE> 23

Restructuring Charges

The Chapter 11 filings, together with the limitation on the Company's
financing alternatives, necessitated a comprehensive review of the Company's
operations. As a result of this review, during the fiscal year ended March 31,
1996, the Company recognized the following restructuring charges (In
Thousands):

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Loss on Early Retirement of Fixed Assets $ 8,329
Loss on Inventory Valuation 1,510
-------
9,839

Chapter 11 Reorganization Charges:
Product Development and Software Costs 4,605
Goodwill Write-down 2,937
Terminated Joint Venture 550
Professional Fees 103
-------
8,195
-------

Total From Continuing Operations, including
$16,421 of impairment losses 18,034
-------

Loss on Disposal of Discontinued Operations 5,229
-------

Total Restructuring Charges $23,263
=======
</TABLE>

The Company considered the fact that there was uncertainty as to its
ability to continue as a going concern in making a determination of the
carrying value of its assets.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $1.6 million (153%) to
$2.7 million in 1996 as compared to $1.1 million in 1995. The increase resulted
from the fact that the Company reduced the estimated useful lives of its
property and equipment to reflect technological changes. Although the Company
believes that certain machinery and equipment utilized in its manufacturing
process are technologically advanced, depreciation rates are estimates and are
determined as accurately as possible based upon past experience and other
pertinent information. Due to the fact that the technology inherent in much of
the medication dispensing system equipment is changing rapidly, the Company
continually evaluates its estimates and adjusts them accordingly. These changes
resulted in additional depreciation expense in 1996 in the amount of $589,000.
In addition, depreciation and amortization increased due to the acquisition of
equipment and other assets in 1995. In accordance with the Company's policy,
these assets were depreciated or amortized for one-half year in 1995 and a full
year in 1996.

Loss from Discontinued Operations

The Company has elected to treat Vangard as a discontinued operation
because of management's decision to dispose of the business. The loss incurred
by Vangard was $6.6 million 1996; there was no loss from discontinued
operations in 1995.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1996 increased 22%
to approximately $1.7 million from $1.4 million in the prior year. This
increase primarily resulted from an increase in debt. The Company discontinued
accruing interest on its secured debt effective January 3, 1996 due to Chapter
11. The amount of interest which was not accrued was $609,000.

21
<PAGE> 24

Income Taxes

The Company realized an income tax benefit of $1.9 million for the year
ended March 31, 1996, primarily as a result of the net operating loss compared
to an income tax benefit of approximately $0.8 million in 1995. A portion of
this loss has been carried back to recover taxes paid in previous years. In
addition, the unused portion of $17.8 million will be carried forward to offset
future taxable income. The Company recorded a valuation allowance in the amount
of approximately $6.9 million to offset entirely the deferred tax asset related
to the net operating loss carryforward.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 1995 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR 1994

Revenues

Net revenues for the year ended March 31, 1995 increased to approximately
$14.8 million, 20% from $12.3 million the previous year. The increase resulted
primarily from increased revenues in the medication dispensing system business
segment, which increased 26% as a result of increased sales and marketing
efforts. Revenues for the clinical laboratory were essentially unchanged from
1995 to 1996.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1995, increased 40% to
$7.8 million from $5.5 million. The increase was primarily due to increase in
revenue experienced by the medication dispensing system business segment, as
well as increases in raw material and labor costs. Cost of sales as a
percentage of sales increased from 45% in fiscal year 1994 to 52% in fiscal
year 1995.

Selling, General and Administrative

SG&A expenses were constant at about $2.4 million in fiscal year 1995
which was 6% lower than the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of revenues,
these expenses were 16% and 21% for fiscal years 1995 and 1994, respectively.
The reduction of these expenses as a percentage of revenues is primarily
attributed to the decline of fixed expenses as a percentage of revenues on
higher sales recorded.

Interest Expense

Net interest expense increased to approximately $1.4 million as compared
to approximately $0.4 million in the prior year due to the increased debt
incurred primarily for expenditures for development projects, acquisition of
fixed assets and the higher interest rates in effect this fiscal year.

Other Items

In this period, the Company had increased depreciation and amortization
expenses of approximately $1.1 million as compared to approximately $0.8
million in the prior fiscal year, while project and development expenses
increased to approximately $4.3 million compared to no charge in the prior
fiscal year, as a result of management's decision to focus its resources to
better realize the potential of its new MedServ product line of computerized
medication dispensing carts. As a consequence, the Company elected to expense
all other project and product development costs except those related to
MedServ.

22
<PAGE> 25

Net Loss

The Company incurred a loss of approximately $1.3 million for the fiscal
year ending March 31, 1995 compared to net income of approximately $3.2 million
in the previous year. This loss is attributed to increased interest expense as
described above, the write-off of certain project and product development costs
and increased depreciation and amortization expense. During the prior fiscal
year, an accounting charge benefited income by $0.5 million as a result of the
cumulative effect of the adoption of FASB No. 109 for income taxes.

On a per share basis, net loss for the period was $0.32 compared to a net
profit of $0.82 for the same period last year.

Income Taxes

As a result of the loss, the Company had a tax benefit of approximately
$0.8 million which the Company carried forward to offset future taxes compared
to the provision for taxes of $1.1 million for fiscal 1994. During fiscal year
1994, the applied tax rate was 37%. The application of such a tax rate was
appropriate for that year and included provisions for both federal and state
taxes.

LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND CASH FLOW

The Company incurred a net loss from continuing operations for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1996 of $22.7 million versus $1.3 million in 1995. Cash
used by operating activities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996 was
$0.9 million versus $0.4 million provided in 1995.

The increase in the cash used by operating activities resulted primarily
from the operating loss incurred in 1996. The operating loss, exclusive of
depreciation, amortization, losses incurred relative to the impairment of
certain assets, and the issuance of Common Stock was $943,000. In addition,
accounts receivable increased $458,000 as a result of increased sales.
Inventory decreased $297,000 due to the Company's efforts to reduce quantities
on hand in order to conserve cash. Accounts payable increased $1,724,000
primarily due to increased business activity, as well as the Company's efforts
to delay payments to suppliers.

Investing activities utilized $2.9 million for the year ended March 31,
1996 versus $9.8 million in 1995. The decrease resulted primarily from the fact
that the Company significantly reduced its capital equipment and project
development activities in 1996. Purchases of equipment were $797,000 and
expenditures for product development were $484,000 in fiscal year 1996. The
Company invested $1,453,000 in acquisitions, primarily the acquisition of Tampa
Pathology Laboratory.

Financing activities provided $4.2 million for the year ended March 31,
1996 versus $12.8 million in 1995. The decrease resulted primarily from the
fact that the Company significantly reduced its capital equipment and project
development activities which had been funded in 1995 primarily with long-term
debt. Borrowing on bank lines of credit was $2,162,000 in fiscal year 1996.
Additional borrowing on long-term debt was $3,021,000 and repayments of
long-term debt were $947,000.

The Company had working capital as of March 31, 1996 and March 31, 1995 of
$5.4 million. Current liabilities do not include $30 million of liabilities
associated with the Plan of Reorganization for the MTS debtors, which was
ultimately approved by the Bankruptcy Court.

The Company's short-term and long-term liquidity is dependent upon a
successful reorganization under Chapter 11 and the Company's ability to
generate cash flow from operations. Other than cash flow from operations, the
Company does not currently have any other source of liquidity.

23
<PAGE> 26

No assurances can be given that additional equity capital will be made
available to the Company. In the event the Company is able to raise additional
equity, the raising of such equity will likely dilute the interests of existing
stockholders.

The Company's lender has a first security interest in and lien upon
substantially all of the Company's assets. The Company did not file a
bankruptcy petition for the parent corporation.

As of March 31, 1996, the Company had $16,862,000 outstanding on its bank
line of credit and $10,398,000 outstanding on a note payable to its bank. Both
the line of credit and the note payable are due and payable as a result of
violations of certain financial covenants in the borrowing agreements with the
bank. The Bankruptcy Court has approved the Plan of Reorganization, which
provides for satisfaction of these debts. These debts will be satisfied out of
cash flow generated by operations.

The Company's requirements for working capital will be based in part upon
its ability to reorganize its affairs under Chapter 11. Accounts receivable and
inventory are not expected to increase based on the current level of
operations. There are no major capital equipment expenditures anticipated. Cash
flow from operations is the only source of additional working capital.

The Company's continued existence as a going concern is dependent upon the
Plan of Reorganization restoring profitable operations. The Plan of
Reorganization provides for the following significant matters:

(a) A reduction in the amount of the existing bank indebtedness, as well
as the interest rate on the indebtedness.

(b) A restructuring of the repayment terms of the bank indebtedness,
which provides for interest payments only for a certain period and
principal payments over an extended period of time.

(c) A reduction in the amount payable pursuant to the acquisition of
Tampa Pathology Laboratory, as well as modification of the method of
calculating the repayment.

(d) A restructuring of the amounts and repayment terms for the unsecured
creditors of the MTS debtors.

(e) A restructuring of the management of the Company.

(f) The disposal of Vangard and GPC.

In addition to the Plan of Reorganization, management has instituted cost
reduction measures, including significant reductions in personnel in each of
its subsidiaries.

Management believes that the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization,
and the effect of cost reduction measures will restore profitability and
provide for adequate cash to support its operation during the next fiscal year.
However, there can be no assurance that this will occur.

24
<PAGE> 27

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See the audited financial statements of the Company and related
supplementary data attached at the end of this Form 10-K/A.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENT WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None

25
<PAGE> 28

PART III

ITEM 10: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The Bylaws of the Company provide that its Board of Directors shall
consist of not more than two nor more than seven members, as may be fixed from
time to time by action of the Board of Directors or of the shareholders. The
Board was comprised of two members prior to the 1996 Annual Meeting. At the
1996 Annual Meeting, the number of directors was increased to four. Each
director serves a one-year term expiring upon the occurrence of the next annual
meeting of shareholders and the election and qualification there of his
successor.

The directors and executive officers, their ages and the year each person
became a director or officer of the Company are shown below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Director or
Officer
Name Age Company Position Held Since
- - - - ---------------------------------- ------- ---------------------------------------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Todd E. Siegel 38 Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, 1986
Chief Executive Officer

David Kazarian 58 Director 1988

Michael Conroy 48 Director, Chief Financial Officer and Vice 1996
President

John Stanton 48 Director, Vice Chairman of the Board of 1996
Directors

Ronald Rhodes 48 Principal Accounting Officer and Controller 1991

Robert A. Capalbo 38 Vice President of Finance 1996
</TABLE>

Todd E. Siegel became President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
in 1993 and became a Vice President, Secretary and a Director of the Company in
1986. Mr. Siegel received a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration from
Fort Lewis College. Before joining MTS, Mr. Siegel was an account executive for
American Medical International Diagnostic Service of Culver City, California.
He also spent over four years as the Sales Management and Sales Representative
for the Chamberlin Corporation in Largo, Florida, a manufacturer of generic
liquid unit dose medications.

David Kazarian has served as a Director of the Company since 1988. Prior
to its sale in December 1990, Mr. Kazarian and his wife owned and operated
Kazarian Pharmacy. In March 1991, Mr. Kazarian founded Infuserve America, Inc.,
a firm involved in the home health care business. Currently, Mr. Kazarian is
President of Infuserve America, Inc.

Michael Conroy has served as a Director of the Company since 1996. Mr.
Conroy was selected as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President by the board
of directors in August 1996. Mr. Conroy also is a principal in the firm of CFO
Financial Services, Inc. ("CFO"). See "Certain Relationships." Mr. Conroy has
experience in assisting companies in financial restructuring, negotiations with
lenders and financial reporting. From 1990 through 1994,

26
<PAGE> 29

Mr. Conroy was the Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Grant Group of Companies. Since February 1996, Mr. Conroy has been devoting
substantially all of his full time to the affairs of the Company. Mr. Conroy is
a certified public accountant.

John Stanton has served as a director of the company since 1996. Mr.
Stanton has an extensive background in corporate crisis management. He is
currently the president of Florida Engineered Construction Products Corp.
("FECP"), which is a privately owned company he assisted in successfully
reorganizing. He has been an officer of that company since 1981. See "Certain
Relationships."

Ronald Rhodes has served as the Principal Accounting Officer and
Controller of the Company since 1991. Prior to his employment with the Company,
Mr. Rhodes served as a consultant to various businesses regarding accounting,
finance, and tax issues. In addition, from 1983 to 1988, Mr. Rhodes served as
Vice President of Finance of Porpoise Pool and Patio, Inc., a retail and
wholesale supplier of pool and patio products.

Robert A. Capalbo was selected by the board of directors to be the
Company's Vice President of Finance in July 1996. From 1991 to 1993, Mr.
Capalbo served as vice president of Maxfax Services, Inc. In 1993, Mr. Capalbo
became a vice president with Barnett Banks, Inc. Mr. Capalbo was promoted to
senior vice president of Barnett Banks, Inc. in 1995 and continued in that
position until 1996.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

No officers or directors of the Company filed any Forms 3, 4 or 5 during
the fiscal year 1996. Management of the Company has implemented a Section 16
compliance program in conformity with the recently enacted amendments to Item
402 of Regulation S-K.

During the fiscal year 1996, Todd E. Siegel elected to receive 160,769
shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash compensation pursuant to his employment
agreement. The Company issued to Mr. Siegel 110,769 of these shares on
February 13, 1996 and the remaining 50,000 shares on August 2, 1996. In
addition, Mr. Siegel has been issued options to acquire 60,000 shares under his
employment agreement and long-term incentive agreement. A delinquent filing has
been made to reflect these transactions. In addition, during 1994, shares of
the Company's Common Stock were transferred from the Siegel Family Limited
Partnership to the JADE Family Partnership to facilitate estate tax planning. A
delinquent filing has been made to reflect this transfer. No sales or other
dispositions of the Company's Common Stock were effected by Todd E. Siegel
during fiscal year 1996.

The Company considers the non-compliance with Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act Reporting Requirements as a deviation from its standard practices,
due to the bankruptcy proceedings of its significant subsidiaries during fiscal
year 1996. The Company does not expect that it will have significant
Section 16(a) reporting violations in the future. The Company does not believe
that any insiders disposed of their shares during the current fiscal year or
that any insider trading or profit taking occurred. The non-compliance was
limited to the failure to file timely Form 4s for additional acquisitions of
shares pursuant to employment arrangements or transfer of shares between
entities for estate tax purposes.

27
<PAGE> 30

ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table shows, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996, and
the two preceding fiscal years, the cash compensation paid by the Company, as
well as certain other compensation paid or accrued for the year, to the
Company's chief executive officers. None of the Company's other executive
officers had total annual compensation exceeding $100,000 for such periods.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long Term Compensation
-------------------------------------
Annual Compensation Awards Payouts
-------------------------------- --------------------------- ---------
Other Restricted Securities
Name and Year Salary Bonus Annual Stock Underlying LTIP All Other
Principal ($) ($) Compensation Award(s) Options/SARs Payouts Compensation
Position ($)(4) ($) (#) ($) ($)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Todd E. Siegel, 1996 $157,462(2) -0- $22,538 -0- 60,000(3) -0- -0-
President and Chief 1995 $129,064 -0- -0- -0- 40,000 -0- -0-
Executive Officer(1) 1994 $ 95,492 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerald Couture, 1996 $156,054(5) -0- $21,941 -0- 20,000(6) -0- -0-
Chief Financial 1995 $ 90,518 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
Officer and Director 1994 $ 44,770 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

- - - - -------------

(1) Mr. Siegel did not have an employment agreement or rights to such
compensation prior to September 1, 1994. Effective September 1, 1994, Mr.
Siegel entered into an employment agreement with the company. See "Employment
Agreements."

(2) Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Siegel elected to receive
160,769 shares of the Company's common stock , at a price of $0.25 per share, in
lieu of cash compensation in the amount of $42,692. The Company issued Mr.
Siegel 110,769 of these unregistered shares on February 13, 1996 and the
remaining 50,000 shares on August 2, 1996. At the time of Mr. Siegel's
election, the closing bid price was $0.44 and the closing ask price was $0.56.
The board of directors valued these shares at $0.25 per share because they were
not freely tradeable. The fair market value of the 160,769 shares has been
included in the 1996 salary figure of $157,462 to reflect the value of the
compensation Mr. Siegel elected to receive.

(3) Consists of 40,000 options repriced in 1996 and 20,000 options
granted in 1996. For year ended March 31, 1995, Mr. Siegel was issued options
to acquire 40,000 shares of Common Stock at $7.00 per share (fair market value
as of grant date) with a ten-year exercise period. In 1996, the Company reduced
the exercise price for these options to $1.625. In addition, Mr. Siegel
receives options to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock per
year pursuant a long-term incentive agreement. The options granted in 1996
have an exercise price of $1.625 per share. See "Employment Agreements." Mr.
Siegel is also entitled to SARs based upon certain criteria relating to the
market value of the Company. No SARs were issued under this agreement for year
ended March 31, 1996.

(4) Includes automobile expenses, hospitalization and life insurance paid
by the Company for the benefit of the named individual. The automobile expenses
for Mr. Siegel and Mr. Couture for 1996 were $12,888 and $17,394, respectively,
which represented 57% and 80%, respectively, of the total "Other Annual
Compensation" received by each.

28
<PAGE> 31

(5) Mr. Couture is the former chief financial officer and director of the
Company. Mr. Couture received 160,165 unregistered shares of the Company's
common stock in lieu of cash compensation. The Company issued Mr. Couture these
shares, at a price of $0.25 per share, in lieu of paying him cash in the amount
of $40,154. At the time the shares were issued, the closing bid price was $0.44
and the closing ask price was $0.56. The board of directors valued these shares
at $0.25 per share because they were not freely tradeable. This value is
included in Mr. Couture's salary figure of $156,054 to reflect the fair market
value of the compensation received by Mr. Couture.

(6) In the year ended March 31, 1996, Mr. Couture was issued options to
acquire 20,000 shares of Common Stock at $1.625, with a ten year exercise
period.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

Effective September 1, 1994, the Company entered into an Employment
Agreement with Mr. Siegel (the "Employment Agreement"). The Employment
Agreement is for a five year term. Mr. Siegel's base salary for the period
September 1, 1994 through August 31, 1995, is $150,000, and increases 6% per
year to approximately $189,000 for the fifth year of his agreement ending
August 31, 1999. The Employment Agreement also provides for bonuses, expense
reimbursement, and other performance-based incentive compensation arrangements.

The Employment Agreement provides Mr. Siegel the right to receive
compensation in the form of common stock of the Company in lieu of cash. For
fiscal year end March 31, 1996, Mr. Siegel elected to receive 160,769
unregistered shares of the Company's common stock pursuant to this provision.
The Company issued 110,769 of these shares on February 13, 1996 and the
remaining 50,000 shares on August 2, 1996. The value of these shares has been
included in Mr. Siegel's salary in the Summary Compensation Table.

In connection with the execution of the Employment Agreement, Mr. Siegel
was granted the right to acquire 40,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at
an exercise price of $7.00 per share which was the fair market value of such
shares as of the date of grant. In 1996, this exercise price was reset to
$1.625. The options are "non-qualified" and have an exercise period of ten
years.

The Employment Agreement provides for severance payments equal to a lump
sum payment of 299% of his then current base salary in the event of (i) a
change of control and a subsequent termination without cause of Mr. Siegel or
(ii) a material reduction in his compensation. The Employment Agreement
contains a restrictive covenant not to compete, solicit or disclose
confidential information during the term of such agreements.

The Company and Mr. Siegel have entered into an Executive Stock
Appreciation Rights and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (the "Long-Term
Incentive Agreement") to provide for the long-term incentive of Mr. Siegel and
the alignment of his interest with those of the Company's shareholders. The
Long-Term Incentive Agreement grants Mr. Siegel a stock appreciation right
("SAR") equal to 3.25% of the incremental increase in the value of the Company
between successive fiscal years. Originally, value was defined to mean the
difference between the total market capitalization of the Company between
successive fiscal year ends. Now that the Common Stock has been delisted from
NASDAQ, value will be determined by the average of the high bid and ask price
for the Common Stock as quoted on the NASD OTC bulletin board. The total
market capitalization means the total number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding multiplied by the closing price of the Common Stock traded on the
NASDAQ (or other exchange).

Mr. Siegel has the option of receiving his rights to such SARs in the form
of cash or the Company's Common Stock equal to the cash value. The shares of
Common Stock issued to Mr. Siegel shall be valued at one-half of the fair
market value of the Company's Common Stock as of the March 31 in the year for
which the SARs are granted (the "Valuation Date"). In the event of a change of
control or sale of the Company's business, Mr. Siegel's rights under his SARs
are accelerated and immediately vested.

29
<PAGE> 32

Pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Agreement, the Company granted Mr.
Siegel the right to acquire up to 20,000 shares of its Common Stock on an
annual basis at a purchase price equal to the fair market value of such shares
as of the end of each fiscal year during the term of this agreement. Such
options are non-qualified and have a ten year term. The options granted in
1996 had an exercise price of $1.625 per share.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

In 1995, the Company instituted an employee stock purchase plan. Due to
changes in its financial condition, the Company filed a Form S-8 on March 21,
1996 and restated the employee stock purchase plan (the "New Plan"). Under the
New Plan, employees who agreed to salary reductions and certain consultants and
advisors are eligible to participate. The New Plan entitles employees to
purchase the Company's Common Stock for $0.25 per share and allows consultants
and advisors to purchase such stock for $0.50 per share.

STOCK OPTIONS

The following table contains information concerning grants of stock
options to Messrs. Siegel and Couture for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.

STOCK OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Grants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent of Total Exercise or
Number of Securities Options Granted to Base Price
Underlying Options Employees in Fiscal per Share Expiration
Name Granted in 1996 (1) Year 1996 (5) Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
20,000(2) 20.9% $1.625 2006(7)
Todd E. Siegel 40,000(3) 40.0% $1.625 2005(6)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerald Couture 20,000(4) 20.0% $1.625 2006(7)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(1) See "Employment Agreements."

(2) Pursuant to a long-term incentive agreement with Mr. Siegel, in 1996,
the Company granted him options to acquire 20,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock. The options granted in 1996 have an exercise price of $1.625 and
have an exercise period of ten years.

(3) These shares represent the 40,000 shares underlying the options that
the Company granted to Mr. Siegel in 1995. The Company reset the exercise price
of such options from $7.00 to $1.625 in 1996.

(4) In 1996, the Company granted Mr. Couture options to purchase 20,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock. The options have an exercise price of
$1.625 and are exercisable for a period of ten years.

(5) Options granted are exercisable for a period of ten years. Currently,
the exercised price of such shares is $1.625. The exercise price of such
options may be reduced by a resolution of the board of directors.

(6) Refers to fiscal year of expiration. Actual expiration date is August
31, 2004.

(7) Refers to actual and fiscal year of expiration.

30
<PAGE> 33

OPTION HOLDINGS

The named executive officers did not exercise any options during the
fiscal year ended March 31, 1996. The following table sets forth information
with respect to unexercised options held as of the end of the fiscal year.

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND
FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised in-the-Money Options/SARS at
Shares Options/SARS at Fiscal Year-End Fiscal Year-End
Acquired on Value (#) ($)
Name Exercise(#) Realized($) Exercisable/Unexercisable Exercisable/Unexercisable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Todd E. Siegel -0- -0- 60,000(1) -0-(2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerald Couture -0- -0- 20,000 -0-(3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(1) Represents stock options issued in 1996 and 1995. See "Employment
Agreements." All such options are exercisable.

(2) Value is based on the bid price of a share of the Company's Common
Stock as of March 29, 1996 ($0.31), the last trading day of the fiscal year,
minus the exercise price ($1.625) multiplied by 60,000, which yields a negative
figure.

(3) Value is based on the bid price of a share of the Company's Common
Stock as of March 29, 1996 ($0.31), the last trading day of the fiscal year,
minus the exercise price ($1.625) multiplied by 20,000, which yields a negative
figure.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Prior to 1994, the company did not pay the directors any fees for serving
as directors. Directors were reimbursed out-of-pocket costs for attending board
meetings. Commencing at the 1994 Annual Meeting, directors, who are not
otherwise employees of the Company, are paid a $750 fee for attending meetings.
The fee is $350 if a meeting is held telephonically. In addition, as of 1994,
directors are issued options to acquire 2,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of such shares at the
date of issuance for each year that an individual serves as a director.
Directors' options are issued as of the date of each annual meeting of
directors. Directors must serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders
to vest their options issued in the prior year. Directors are also issued
options to acquire 1,000 shares of Common Stock for serving on a committee and
options to acquire an additional 1,000 shares of Common Stock if they are the
chairperson of a committee. The options shall expire 10 years from their
issuance date.

31
<PAGE> 34

ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table enumerates, as of October 25, 1996, the name, address,
and ownership, both by numerical holding and percentage of interest of each
beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the Company's outstanding
Common Stock or Preferred Stock, the directors and executive officers of the
Company, individually, and outstanding as a group. As of October 25, 1996,
approximately 5,903,788 shares were issued and outstanding.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount and
Nature of
Name and Address of Title of Beneficial Common Stock Percentage of
Beneficial Owner Class Ownership Percentage Voting Shares (5)
- - - - ------------------------------------ -------------- -------------- ------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Todd E. Siegel, individually and Common 636,082 (3) 10.8% 72.1%
through the Siegel Family Limited Preferred 6,500,000
Partnership(1)(2)
10043 Windtree Blvd.
Seminole, FL 34642

David Kazarian(4) Common 31,000 0.5% 0.2%
1340 Gulf Blvd.
Clearwater, FL 34630

Michael Conroy(6) Common 100,000 1.7% 0.5%
100 N. Tampa St., Suite 2150
Tampa, FL 33602

John Stanton Common 100,000 1.7% 0.5%

Robert A. Capalbo(7) Common 25,000 0.4% 0.1%

Ronald Rhodes(8) Common 20,808 0.4% 0.1%

All Officers and Directors Common 912,890 15.5% 73.5%
as a Group (4 persons) Preferred 6,500,000
</TABLE>

(1) Todd E. Siegel is the trustee of the Siegel Family QTIP Trust, established
pursuant to the Siegel Family Revocable Trust (the "Trust"), during his
lifetime and accordingly controls the shares owned of record by the Trust.
The Trust is the managing partner of the JADE Family Partnership (the
"Partnership") and accordingly controls the Partnership. Currently, Todd
Siegel owns 185,769 shares of Common Stock individually. The Partnership
owns 390,313 shares of Common Stock.

(2) The Partnership is the owner of record of 6,500,000 Shares of the
Company's Voting Preferred Stock (100% of the outstanding Preferred
Stock). Each share of Voting Preferred Stock has the power to cast two
votes per share on any matter on which the Common Stock is entitled to
vote.

(3) Includes options to acquire 60,000 shares of Common Stock at $1.625 per
share granted in connection with his employment arrangements. This figure
also includes the 160,769 unregistered shares of common stock Mr. Siegel
received in lieu of salary. See "Executive Compensation - Employment
Agreements."

32
<PAGE> 35

(4) Includes options to acquire 6,000 shares at $1.625 and includes 25,000
shares of Common Stock held by his wife for which Mr. Kazarian disclaims
beneficial ownership.

(5) Includes 6,500,000 shares of Preferred Stock held of record by the
Partnership, of which Todd E. Siegel may be deemed to be the beneficial
owner.

(6) Since 1996, Mr. Conroy has been the Company's Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President. Mr. Conroy was selected to be Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President by the board of directors in August 1996. Currently, Mr.
Conroy does not have an employment agreement with the Company.

(7) Represents options to acquire 25,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock.
Upon becoming Vice President of Finance in July 1996, Mr. Capalbo received
options to acquire 25,000 shares. The options are currently exercisable at
an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The exercise period of the options
is ten years. Mr. Capalbo was also granted the option to acquire an
additional 25,000 shares, which becomes exercisable in July 1997.

(8) Represents shares received by Mr. Rhodes, at a price of $0.25 per share,
in lieu of salary.

Other than as set forth above, the Company is not aware of any other
shareholders who beneficially own, individually or as a group, 5% or more of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock.

Effective June 15, 1996, the Company entered into a severance agreement
(the "Severance Agreement") with Mr. Couture, its former director and chief
financial officer. The Severance Agreement superseded Mr. Couture's employment
agreement, dated September 1, 1994.

As part of the Severance Agreement, the Company acknowledged that it owed
Mr. Couture past due compensation in the amount of $32,789 that it had been
unable to pay. Pursuant to the Severance Agreement, the parties agreed that the
Company would deliver to Mr. Couture furniture valued at $4,886 in partial
settlement of the past-due compensation. Additionally, the Company paid Mr.
Couture $14,883 and applied $13,000 against amounts Mr. Couture owed to the
Company to fully satisfy the past due compensation obligation. See "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."

ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The JADE Family Partnership ("Partnership") is currently the holder of
6,500,000 shares of Voting Preferred Stock. The Siegel Family QTIP Trust,
established pursuant to the terms of the Siegel Family Revocable Trust (the
"Trust"), which originally acquired the shares of Voting Preferred Stock in
1986 for the aggregate par value of the shares ($650.00), transferred the
shares to the Siegel Family Limited Partnership in 1993. The Siegel Family
Limited Partnership transferred the shares to the Partnership in 1994. Mr.
Siegel is the trustee of the Trust, which is the managing general partner of
the Partnership, and accordingly, controls the shares held by the Partnership.

The Voting Preferred Stock has two votes per share on all matters
submitted to a vote of other holders of Common Stock. In addition to
preferential voting rights, the Voting Preferred Stock is entitled to receive
upon dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the first $10,000 of proceeds
distributed to stockholders of the Company upon such events. Thereafter, the
Voting Preferred Stock is entitled to no additional amounts upon dissolution or
liquidation of the Company. The Voting Preferred Stock has no dividend rights,
redemption provisions, sinking fund provisions or conversion, or preemptive or
exchange rights. The Voting Preferred Stock is not subject to further calls or
assessments by the Company.

The Voting Preferred Stock was issued to assure complete and unfettered
control of the Company. The issuance of the Voting Preferred Stock constitutes
an anti-takeover device since the approval of any merger or acquisition of the
Company will be completely dependent upon the approval of the Trust.

33
<PAGE> 36

Harold B. Siegel was the inventor of the patents and other proprietary
rights for the equipment and processes that the Company uses and sells. The
Trust is the assignee of all such proprietary and patent rights used in the
Company's business. In October 1986, the Company was granted rights to an
exclusive perpetual license from the Trust to utilize the know-how and patent
rights assigned to the Trust by Harold B. Siegel in the manufacture and sale of
the Company's medication dispensing systems.

The license granted to the Company by the Trust may only be terminated by
the Trust in the event the Company: (i) ceases to utilize the know-how created
by the Trust; (ii) defaults in making any royalty payment and fails to remedy
such default within 40 days after written notice by the Trust; or (iii) becomes
insolvent, makes any assignment for the benefit of creditors, is adjudged
bankrupt, or if a receiver or trustee of the Company's property is appointed.
Under such circumstances, the license will automatically terminate. In
addition, the Trust has granted the Company the right to sublicense the rights
granted under the license agreement between the Company and the Trust.

The Trust was originally entitled to receive a royalty of 2% of the gross
revenues realized from the sale of the Company's products. The license
agreement further provided that the Trust would waive any royalty fees owed by
the Company in the event the Company did not generate a pretax profit in any
fiscal year.

In September 1990, the Company, the Trust and Harold B. Siegel entered
into an agreement whereby the Company issued the Trust 1,500,000 shares of
Common Stock and the Trust and Harold B. Siegel agreed to reduce future
royalties due under the license agreement from 2% to 1%. For fiscal year 1996,
the Company owed the Trust royalties in the amount of $62,608. The Company paid
the Trust $30,000 in fiscal year 1996 and paid the remaining $32,608 in
December 1996.

Todd E. Siegel is a guarantor of the Company's outstanding restructured
credit facility with SouthTrust Bank. On September 4, 1996, the Bankruptcy
Court confirmed the Company's restructured indebtedness to the Bank in the
amount of approximately $28.0 million. The 28.0 million has been separated into
two notes, Plan Note I and Plan Note II, and is scheduled to be repaid as
follows:

Plan Note I, in the stated principal amount of approximately $27.0
million, provides for a portion of the principal amount, $15.0 million, to be
due and payable as follows:

a) Interest at the rate of 7.5% for a period of two years ending
September 1, 1998.

Plan Note II, in the stated principal amount of $1,000,000 provided for
payment of $750,000 on or about the date of the confirmation of the plans of
reorganization of the MTS debtors. The Company made the payment of $750,000 on
or about September 5, 1996 and in accordance with the terms of Plan Note II,
the stated principal amount was deemed fully satisfied.

Mr. Siegel agreed to unconditionally guarantee the full and timely payment
of the above payment schedule. Should the Company default on any of the above
payments, Mr. Siegel agreed to immediately cure such default on

34
<PAGE> 37

demand of the Bank. If Mr. Siegel fails to cure the default, the Bank may
proceed directly against Mr. Siegel for payment in a court of competent
jurisdiction. In addition, Todd E. Siegel, as trustee of the Siegel Family
QTIP Trust, which is managing general partner of the JADE partnership, has
pledged 100,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock held by the JADE
Partnership to SouthTrust Bank to secure repayment of the Partnership's
obligations in the amount of $300,000.

As of March 31, 1996, Mr. Siegel had outstanding indebtedness to the
Company of approximately $12,000. This debt represents advances made by the
Company to Mr. Siegel for travel related expenses. In January 1997, Mr. Siegel
signed a promissory note payable to the Company agreeing to cure his $12,000
indebtedness plus 8% interest per annum on January 31, 1998.

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its
directors (including Todd E. Siegel). Such indemnification agreements authorize
indemnification of such directors or officers to the full extent authorized or
permitted by law.

On February 29, 1996, the Company retained the services of CFO Financial
Services, Inc. This entity and its representatives have substantial experience
in assisting entities such as the Company in restructuring and work out
arrangements. Mr. Conroy is affiliated with CFO Financial Services, Inc. The
Company pays CFO Financial Services, Inc. $8,500 a month for Mr. Conroy's
services.

In the same time frame, the Company also retained Octofoil, Inc., an
entity affiliated with Mr. Stanton. The Company pays Octofoil, Inc. $7,500 a
month for Mr. Stanton's services.

Mr. Conroy and Mr. Stanton assisted the Company in the negotiation of a
restructured loan agreement with its principal lenders, a restructured purchase
agreement relating to the acquisition of Tampa Pathology Laboratory,
preparation of the plans of reorganization and disclosure statements for
consideration by the bankruptcy court. In addition, Mr. Conroy has provided
ongoing services in supervising and reorganizing the Company's accounting
staff, as well as implementing financial reporting systems. He has devoted
substantially his full time efforts to the Company. Mr. Stanton and Mr. Conroy
were each issued 100,000 shares under the Company's employees' stock purchase
program for their services.

Mr. Stanton has provided significant time and effort in assisting the
Company in strategic planning and ongoing relationship matters with the
Company's principal lenders.

The Company paid $16,750 to Couture and Company, a consulting firm which
is owned by Mr. Gerald R. Couture. The amount was paid to Couture and Company
for services provided to the Company in connection with the refinancing of the
Company's debt with its principal bank. At the time, Mr. Couture was the Chief
Financial Officer and a Director of the Company.

Pursuant to the terms of the Severance Agreement, the Company agreed to
employ Mr. Couture as Executive Vice President through June 15, 1996. The
parties agreed that, in that capacity, Mr. Couture would perform assigned
executive management, accounting, and administrative tasks as directed by the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company. During this period, Mr. Couture agreed
to a monthly salary at an annualized rate of $148,400.

From June 16, 1996 through June 15, 1997 (the "Consulting Period"), the
Company agreed to employ Mr. Couture as a consultant to the Company. Mr.
Couture agreed that during the Consulting Period, he would render services
consisting of executive-type and management advisory and administrative
services requested by the Company. Mr. Couture agreed to render such services
for not less than 85 hours per each consecutive quarterly period. During

35
<PAGE> 38

the Consulting Period, Mr. Couture agreed to a monthly salary of $4,000 plus
$150 per hour for any hours in excess of 85 per quarterly period.

Unless terminated for cause as defined in the Severance Agreement, the
Company also agreed to pay Mr. Couture severance compensation in the amount of
$450,000, payable in sum certain amounts through June 16, 1998. The Company, in
its sole discretion, has the option of paying such severance compensation in
Common Stock of the Company.

In addition, under the Severance Agreement, the Company acknowledged that
Mr. Couture owned options to purchase 222,500 shares of the Company's Common
Stock. The parties agreed that for a period of ten years from the date the
option was granted or five years from the date of the Severance Agreement,
whichever is longer, the exercise price of the options would be the lowest of:
(i) the purchase price for the option being exercised; (ii) $1.625; or (iii)
the price reset by the Company with respect to any other executive of the
Company.

A final provision of the Severance Agreement entitled Mr. Couture to
purchase up to $43,500 of Common Stock by payroll deduction.

36
<PAGE> 39

PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
(a)1. Financial Statements - See attached
2. Financial Statements - See attached
3. Exhibits - See Index attached and Exhibits included, as appropriate
(b) The following reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the quarter ended March 31,
1996:
1. 8K - Dated January 3, 1996, relating to filing of Chapter 11.
2. 8K - Dated March 14, 1996, relating to issuance of stock to Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(c) Exhibits required by 601 are attached.
*1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement
*1.1(a) Form of Agreement between Underwriters
*1.3 Form of Representative's Warrant
*1.4 Form of Warrant Agent Agreement
**2.1 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Southwest Resources, Inc. and DRG
Consultants, Inc.
**3.1 Articles of Incorporation and Amendments thereto
*3.1(a) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation increasing authorized Common Stock to 25,000,000
from 15,000,000 shares
**3.2 Bylaws of the Company
*4.1 Form of Warrant from July 1992 Offering
**4.1(a) Form of Initial Offering Warrant from January 1988 Offering
**4.2 Designation of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of Voting Preferred Stock
**10.1 Business Lease between Leslie A. Rubin, Limited, as Lessor and the Company as Lessee
dated March 1987
**10.2 Agreement between Ascot Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Travenol Laboratories, Inc. and DRG
Consultants, Inc. (expired)
**10.3 Sales Representation Agreement between DRG Consultants, Inc. and Euclid Medical Systems,
Inc. (expired)
**10.4 Line of Credit Agreement (paid)
**10.5 Equipment Loan Agreement (paid)
**10.6 Siegel Family Revocable Trust Agreement
(8)10.6(a) Amendment and Restated Siegel Family Revocable Trust Agreement
(8)10.6(b) Siegel Family Limited Partnership Agreement
**10.7(a) Agreements and Assignments of Patent Rights between Harold B. Siegel and the Siegel
Family Revocable Trust
**10.7(b) License Agreement between the Company and the Siegel Family Revocable Trust
**10.7(c) Assignment of Trade Names, Licenses, and Accounts Receivable from DRG Consultants, Inc.
to the Company
**10.8 [RESERVED]
**10.9 Promissory Note to Lawrence E. Steinberg dated April 27, 1987, in the amount of $50,000
(paid)
**10.10 [RESERVED]
**10.11 Promissory Note to Overseas Group dated May 8, 1987, in the amount of $75,000 (paid)
</TABLE>

37
<PAGE> 40

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
**10.12 Agreement for Sale of Stock between Lawrence E. Steinberg and the Company dated
April 27, 1987
**10.13 Warrant Agreement between Lawrence E. Steinberg and the Company dated April 27, 1987
**10.14 Warrant Agreement between Overseas Group and the Company dated May 8, 1987
**10.15 Modification of Promissory Note and Warrant Agreement between Overseas Group and the
Company dated December 19, 1987 (paid)
**10.16 Modification of Promissory Note and Warrant Agreement between Lawrence E. Steinberg and
the Company dated December 18, 1987 (paid)
**10.17 Option Agreement between the Siegel Family Revocable Trust and Lawrence E. Steinberg
dated December 18, 1987
**10.18 Promissory Note dated November 30, 1987 in the amount of $31,850.00 (paid)
**10.19 Promissory Note dated November 30, 1987 in the amount of $50,000.00 (paid)
**10.20 Convertible Subordinate Notes issued to unaffiliated investors (paid)
**10.21 Letter Agreement between Gerald L. Couture and the Company (expired)
**10.22 $450,000 Commitment Letter from Florida National Bank (paid)
**10.23 Agreements with Vendor Funding for Sale/Leaseback of Equipment (paid)
**10.24 First Florida Bank $450,000 Revolving Line and $150,000 Equipment Line, Loan Commitment
(paid)
***10.25 Pilot Project and Option Agreement between Sandoz and the Company
****10.26 Documents relating to the acquisition of the business of Ohio Label & Packaging Inc.
dated November 3, 1989
*****10.27 Loan Agreement and other related documents between the Company and Southeast Bank, N.A.
for $3,195,000 credit facility dated March 26, 1990 (paid)
*10.28 Loan Agreement and other related documents related to First Florida Bank, N.A. borrowing
dated November 7, 1990 (paid)
*10.30 Agreement among Company, Trust and Harold B. Siegel regarding modification to royalty
arrangements and issuance of Common Stock and retirement of preferred stock dated
September 2, 1990
(1)10.31 Acquisition and financing documents relating to Clearwater Medical Services, Inc.
(2)10.32 Acquisition and financial documents relating to Clearwater Diagnostic Center, Inc.
(3)10.33 Stock Purchase Agreement for Vangard Labs, Inc.
(4)10.34 Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with First Florida Bank, N.A.
relating to the acquisition of Vangard Labs, Inc. (paid)
(5)10.35 Warrant Agreement between Ladenburg Thalman & Co. and the Company
(6)10.36 Loan and Security Agreement dated December 1, 1992 with Daiwa Bank, Limited
(7)10.37 Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated September 28, 1993 with
SouthTrust Bank of Alabama
(8)10.38 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated April 25, 1994
with SouthTrust Bank of Alabama
(8)10.39 Addendum to Lease dated September 30, 1993 with Leslie A. Rubin for facilities located
at 12920 and 12900 Automobile Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida
(8)10.40 Lease dated August 1, 1993 between Vangard Labs, Inc. and E.P. Vann and Daryl B. Vann
for Glasgow Kentucky facilities
(8)10.41 Lease effective August 2, 1993 by and between C & C Park Building and Medical Technology
Systems, Inc. for property located at 21540 Drake Road, Strongville, Ohio
(8)10.42 Form of 1994 Stock Option Plan
(8)10.43 Form of Employment Agreement for Todd Siegel and Gerald Couture
(8)10.44 Form of Executive Stock Appreciation Rights and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement
</TABLE>

38
<PAGE> 41

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
(8)10.45 Form of Director's Stock Option Agreement
(8)10.46 Form of Directors' Consulting Agreement
(8)10.47 Form of Director/Officer Indemnification Agreement
(8)10.48 Joint Venture Agreement between MedVantage, Inc. and the Company dated January 5, 1995
(8)10.49 Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement effective March 28,
1995
(9)11. Computation of Earnings Per Share
(9)22. List of Subsidiaries
(9)23. Form of Executive Director's Agreement for Gerald Couture
(10)27. Financial Data Schedule
* Incorporated herein by reference to same Exhibit(s), respectively, Registration
Statement No. 33-40678 filed with the Commission on May 17, 1991
** Incorporated herein by reference to same Exhibit(s), respectively, Registration
Statement (SEC File No. 33-17852)
*** Incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 18, 1988
**** Incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 16, 1989
***** Incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for fiscal year end March 31, 1990
(1) Incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K for event dated November 8, 1991
(2) Incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K for event dated November 14, 1991
(3) Incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K for event dated May 27, 1991
(4) Incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for year ended March 31, 1992
(5) Incorporated herein by reference to Form S-3 filed April 16, 1993
(6) Incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for year ended March 31, 1993
(7) Incorporated herein by reference to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 (File No.
33-40678) dated October 14, 1993
(8) Incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for year ended March 31, 1995
(9) Previously filed
(10) Filed herewith
</TABLE>

39
<PAGE> 42

Independent Auditors' Report

Board of Directors
Medical Technology Systems, Inc.
and Subsidiaries
Clearwater, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Medical
Technology Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the management of the Company. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based upon our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. These standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the 1996, 1995, and 1994 consolidated financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Medical Technology Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
March 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 and the results of its operations and cash flows
for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully discussed in
Note 1, the Company incurred losses during the current year of approximately
$34.6 million and its total liabilities exceed its total assets by
approximately $18.5 million as of March 31, 1996. The Company also had negative
cash flows from operations during the current year of approximately $.9 million
and loans in the amount of approximately $29 million are past due. In addition,
the major operating subsidiaries of the Company have filed for protection under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. These conditions raise substantial
doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

We previously issued a report dated June 20, 1996. These financial statements
include additional dislosures found in Notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 18, 19, and 20, which
the Company believes more fully describe activities in which they were
involved. Certain reclassifications have been made in the Company's Statement
of Operations.

Pender Newkirk & Company
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
June 20, 1996, except for Notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 18, 19 and 20
as to which the date is January 28, 1997

40
<PAGE> 43

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
(In Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ASSETS

1996 1995 1994
--------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current Assets:
Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 965 $ 613 $ 473
Accounts Receivable, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,260 3,575 2,676
Income Taxes Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 808 -0-

Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,445 4,252 2,710
Prepaids and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 164 102
--------- -------- --------
Total Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,814 9,412 5,961

Property and Equipment, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,917 13,876 11,645

Other Assets:
Software Development Costs, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- 1,306 1,253
Goodwill, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 971 2,613 2,640
Product Development, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- -0- 1,517
MedServ Development and Related Software, Net . . . . . . . . 170 3,012 1,043
Development Costs of Joint Ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- 463 -0-
Patents, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 565 760 352
Net Assets of Discontinued Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- 11,745 8,425
Other, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 1,056 182
--------- -------- --------
Total Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,938 20,955 15,412
--------- -------- --------

Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,669 $ 44,243 $ 33,018
========= ======== ========

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 168 $ 1,165 $ 979
Accounts Payable-Trade and Accrued Liabilities . . . . . . . . 2,240 2,837 2,076
Income Taxes Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- -0- 1,211
--------- -------- --------
Total Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,408 4,002 4,266

Liabilities Subject to Compromise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,457 -0- -0-

Long-Term Debt, Less Current Maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 23,224 10,588
Deferred Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- 1,377 1,311
--------- -------- --------
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,215 28,603 16,165
--------- -------- --------
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):

Voting Preferred Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1
Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 40 40
Capital In Excess of Par Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,320 7,941 7,898
Retained Earnings (Deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (26,591) 7,989 9,245
Less: Treasury Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (331) (331) (331)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . (18,546) 15,640 16,853
--------- -------- --------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,669 $ 44,243 $ 33,018
========= ======== ========

a) Liabilities Subject to Compromise consist of the following:
Secured Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 28,158
Trade and Other Miscellaneous Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,299
---------
$ 30,457
=========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

41
<PAGE> 44

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
(In Thousands; except Earnings Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
--------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Net Sales and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 17,052 $ 14,830 $ 12,301

Costs and Expenses:
Cost of Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,665 7,756 5,548

Selling, General and Administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,549 2,429 2,577
Loss on Early Retirement of Fixed Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,329 -0- -0-
Product Development and Software Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- 4,271 -0-
Loss on Inventory Revaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,510 -0- -0-
Depreciation and Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,682 1,060 818
Interest, Net (Contractual Interest $2,348) . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,739 1,430 424
--------- -------- --------
Total Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,474 16,946 9,367
--------- -------- --------

Reorganization items:
Product Development and Software Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,605 -0- -0-
Goodwill Write-down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,937 -0- -0-
Terminated Joint Venture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550 -0- -0-
Professional Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 -0- -0-
8,195 -0- -0-
--------- -------- --------
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before
Income Taxes, Discontinued Operations and
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (24,617) (2,116) 2,934

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,900) (844) 1,078
--------- -------- --------
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before
Discontinued Operations and Cumulative Effect
of Accounting Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (22,717) (1,272) 1,856
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations,
Net of Income Tax Benefit ($554) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6,634) 16 762
Estimated (Loss) on Disposal of Discontinued Operations . . . . . . (5,229) -0- -0-
--------- -------- --------

Income (Loss) Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change . . . . . (34,580) (1,256) 2,618

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change for
Adoption of FASB No. 109 on Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- -0- 543
--------- -------- --------

Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (34,580) $ (1,256) $ 3,161
========= ======== ========

Primary Net Earnings (Loss) per Common Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (5.60) $ (.32) $ .48
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2.92) .00 .20
Cumulative Effect of FASB No. 109 Accounting Change . . . . . . . . .00 .00 .14

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (8.52) $ (.32) $ .82
========= ======== ========

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding, Primary . . . . . . . . 4,059 3,974 3,879
========= ======== ========

Assuming Fully Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) per Common Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . $ (5.60) $ (.32) $ $.43
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations . . . . . . . . . . (2.92) .00 .17
Cumulative Effect of FASB No. #109 Accounting Change . . . . . .00 .00 .12

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (8.52) $ (.32) $ .72
========= ======== ========
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding,
Assuming Fully Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,059 3,974 4,595
========= ======== ========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

42
<PAGE> 45

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
(in Thousands Except Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital in
Number $.01 Excess of Retained Treasury
of Shares Par Value Par Value Earnings Stock Total
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, March 31, 1993 . . 3,896,519 $ 39 $ 7,862 $ 6,084 $ (331)$ 13,654
Exercise of Common Stock
Warrants . . . . . . . . . 111,813 1 36 37
Net Income for Year
Ended March 31, 1994 . . . 3,161 3,161
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -------------
Balance, March 31, 1994 . . 4,008,332 40 7,898 9,245 (331) 16,852
Stock Issued . . . . . . . 18,500 43 43
Net Loss For Year Ended
March 31, 1995 (1,256) (1,256)
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -------------
Balance, March 31, 1995 . . 4,026,832 40 7,941 7,989 (331) 15,639
Stock Issued . . . . . . . 1,458,503 15 379 394
Net Loss for Year Ended
March 31, 1996 . . . . . . (34,580) (34,580)
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -------------
Balance, March 31, 1996 . . 5,485,335 $ 55 $ 8,320 $ (26,591) $ (331)$ (18,547)
============ =========== =========== =========== ============= =============

<CAPTION>
VOTING PREFERRED STOCK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number $.0001
of Shares Par Value
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, March 31, 1994 6,500,000 $ 1 $ 1
------------ ----------- -------------
Balance, March 31, 1995 6,500,000 $ 1 $ 1
------------ ----------- -------------
Balance, March 31, 1996 6,500,000 $ 1 $ 1
------------ ----------- -------------
Total Stockholders' Equity
(Deficit), March 31, 1996 $ (18,546)
=============
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

43
<PAGE> 46

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
(In Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
-------- ------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(22,717) $(1,272) $ 2,399
-------- ------- ---------
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash
Provided (Used) by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,682 1,060 818
Product Development and Software Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,605 4,271 -0-

Goodwill Write-down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,937 -0- -0-
Loss on Early Retirement of Fixed Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,329 -0- -0-
Loss on Inventory Revaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,510 -0- -0-
Write-off of Accounts Receivable and Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,323 -0- -0-
Stock Issued from Stock Compensation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388 -0- -0-
(Increase) Decrease in:
Accounts Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (458) (899) (288)
Income Taxes Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (72) (808) -0-
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297 (1,542) (305)

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (100) (62) (10)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,724 761 743
Income Taxes Payable and Deferred Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,347) (1,145) (175)
-------- ------- ---------
Total Adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,818 1,636 783
-------- ------- ---------
Net Cash Provided (used) by Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (899) 364 3,182
-------- ------- ---------
Net Cash used by Discontinued Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (117) (3,304) (2,085)
-------- ------- ---------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expended for Property and Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (797) (3,003) (3,023)
Expended for Software Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (30) (201) (505)
Expended for Product Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (484) (4,739) (1,241)
Expended for Patents and Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (109) (1,127) -0-
Expended for Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,453) (682) -0-
-------- ------- ---------
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,873) (9,752) (4,769)
-------- ------- ---------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payments on Notes Payable, Long-Term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (947) (1,048) (10,057)

Net Proceeds from Line of Credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,162 12,183 4,225
Issuance of Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 10 38
Proceeds from Borrowing on Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt . . . . . . . . . 3,021 1,687 9,558
-------- ------- ---------
Net cash Provided by Financing Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,241 12,832 3,764
-------- ------- ---------
NET INCREASE IN CASH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 140 92
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 613 473 381
-------- ------- ---------
CASH AT END OF PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 965 $ 613 $ 473
======== ======= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,570 $ 1,409 $ 557
======== ======= =========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

44
<PAGE> 47

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Medical Technology Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, incorporated in
March of 1984, provides products and services to pharmacies that dispense
prescription pharmaceuticals to nursing homes, hospitals and other health
assisted care facilities. The Company's principal businesses consist of the
following product lines: (i) the core business of manufacturing and selling
proprietary medication dispensing systems which include punchcards for use by
pharmacies in dispensing prescription medicines; (ii) the computerized pharmacy
information and dispensing systems business which consists of the Performance
hospital pharmacy management software and the MedServ(TM) mobile computerized
medication dispensing systems for hospitals and nursing homes and (iii) the
clinical laboratory service business of supplying diagnostic testing services
to the medical profession.

During the second quarter of 1996, the Company received notice from
Creighton Pharmaceuticals Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sandoz
Pharmaceuticals Corporation, that it intended to terminate its relationship
with the Company in the Glasgow Pharmaceutical Corporation ("GPC") joint
venture which packaged and distributed pharmaceutical products. As a result of
this termination, the Company recorded a $4.6 million dollar write-off of its
investment in GPC. In addition to the terminated joint venture expense, the
Company recorded a related valuation allowance in the amount of approximately
$505,000 on inventory carried in its drug packaging subsidiary, which had been
acquired for the joint venture. The GPC joint venture was created to provide
the Company with a competitive price advantage in the acquisition cost of its
pharmaceuticals as well as provide additional product lines. As a direct
result of the joint venture termination, the Company re-evaluated its position
in the medication packaging market. It was determined that the automated
packaging equipment associated with the core packaging business should be more
fully utilized in order to remain competitive. The early retirement of
portions of the existing packaging equipment resulted in a $3.0 million charge.

During the same quarter, the Company recorded other losses and write-downs
which impacted its earnings. These adjustments included a $1.2 million charge
relating to the obsolescence of an early version of its computerized medication
dispensing product and an additional charge of approximately $500,000 relating
to the valuation of certain inventory and project development costs.

As a result of these significant losses in the second quarter of fiscal
1996, the Company was in violation of certain financial covenants in the
borrowing agreements with its principal lenders. The Company was unable to
reach an agreement with its lenders to amend or restructure the debt. The
extended negotiations with the Company's lenders created substantial
uncertainty which led to management's decision to file for protection under
Chapter 11 for certain of its subsidiaries.

During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 ("Chapter 11") of Title 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code in the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division (the
"Bankruptcy Court") for four of its subsidiaries ("MTS debtors"). The MTS
debtors are presently operating their businesses as debtors-in-possession under
the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and intend to reorganize pursuant to
Chapter 11. As debtors-in-possession, these subsidiaries may engage in
transactions within the ordinary course of business without approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.

Liabilities subject to compromise in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets represent the Company's estimate of liabilities as of the filing date
subject to adjustment in the reorganization process. Under Chapter 11,

45
<PAGE> 48

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

actions to enforce certain claims against the MTS debtors are stayed if the
claims arose, or are based on events that occurred, on or before the petition
date. The ultimate terms of settlement of these labilities and claims will be
determined in accordance with a plan of reorganization which requires the
approval of prepetition creditors and confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court.
Other liabilities may arise or be subject to compromise as a result of
rejection of executory contracts, including leases, or the Bankruptcy Court's
resolution of claims for contingencies and other disputed amounts. The
ultimate resolution of such liabilities will be part of a plan of
reorganization. Claims secured by the debtor's assets ("secured claims") also
are stayed, although the creditors of such claims have the right to move the
court for relief from the stay.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company
incurred losses during the current year of approximately $34.6 million and its
total liabilities exceed its total assets by approximately $18.5 million as of
March 31, 1996. The Company also had negative cash flows from operations
during the current year of approximately $.9 million and loans in the amount of
approximately $29 million are past due. In addition, the major operating
subsidiaries of the Company have filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
these uncertainties.

The Company's continued existence as a going concern is dependent upon the
plan of reorganization restoring profitable operations. Management has
developed a plan of reorganization that has been approved by the Bankruptcy
Court. The plan provides for the following significant matters:

(a) A reduction in the amount of the existing bank indebtedness, as well
as the interest rate on the indebtedness.

(b) A restructuring of the repayment terms of the bank indebtedness,
which provides for interest payments only for a certain period and
principal payments over an extended period of time.

(c) A reduction in the amount payable pursuant to the acquisition of
Tampa Pathology Laboratory, as well as modification of the method of
calculating the repayment.

(d) A restructuring of the amounts and repayment terms for the unsecured
creditors of the MTS debtors.

(e) A restructuring of the management of the Company.

(f) The disposal of Vangard Labs, Inc. and GPC.

In addition to the plan of reorganization management has instituted cost
reduction measures, including significant reductions in personnel in each of
its subsidiaries.

Management believes that the implementation of the plan of reorganization,
and the effort in cost reduction measures will restore profitability and
provide for adequate cash to support its operation during the next fiscal year.
However, there can be no assurances that this will occur.

NOTE 2 - RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES

In December 1995, the Company initiated a cost reduction strategy that
focused upon reducing operating expenses and returning the Company to
profitability. This plan included the filing on January 3, 1996 of voluntary
petitions under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the Middle
District of Florida for three of the

46
<PAGE> 49

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

Company's subsidiaries: MTS Packaging Systems, Inc., Medical Technology
Laboratories, Inc. and MTS Sales and Marketing, Inc. On February 22, 1996, the
Company also filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 for its generic drug
repackaging subsidiary, Vangard Labs, Inc.

These Chapter 11 filings, together with the limitation on the Company's
financing alternatives, necessitated a comprehensive examination of the
Company's business operations. Because of the numerous development projects
that the Company had underway, and the limited opportunity that existed for
completion of these projects, it was decided by management that, without
additional capital, virtually none of the existing development projects could
be successfully completed.

The following restructuring charges were incurred during the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1996 (In Thousands):

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Loss on Early Retirement of Fixed Assets $ 8,329
Loss on Inventory Valuation . . . . . . . . . . . 1,510
---------
9,839

Chapter 11 Reorganization Charges:
Product Development and Software Costs . . 4,605
Goodwill Write-down . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,937
Terminated Joint Venture . . . . . . . . . 550
Professional Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
---------
8,195
---------

Total From Continuing Operations, including
$16,421 of impairment losses . . . . . . . . 18,034
---------

Loss on Disposal of Discontinued Operations . . . 5,229
---------

Total Restructuring Charges . . . . . . . . . . . $ 23,263
=========
</TABLE>

NOTE 3 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

As part of a corporate restructuring strategy, the Company plans to
concentrate its resources on its medication card business and the medication
dispensing technology products which have been developed and are presently
marketable. Although the clinical diagnostic laboratory business has been
identified as a non-core business, its operations are a source of cash to
support future debt obligations of the Company. The Company's generic drug
repackaging subsidiary, Vangard Labs, Inc., whose production operations were
suspended on January 3, 1996 and subsequently filed a voluntary petition under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the Middle District of
Florida on February 22, 1996, will be divested. In addition, the GPC joint
venture with Creighton Pharmaceutical Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., is considered a discontinued operation primarily
because of its dependence upon Vangard production capabilities. A pre-tax
charge of approximately $5.2 million for a loss on disposal of these
discontinued operations was recorded in fiscal year 1996 and is shown in the
Statement of Operations as estimated loss on disposal of discontinued
operations.

47
<PAGE> 50

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

At the time of the Chapter 11 filing, the Company committed itself to a
formal plan to dispose of Vangard Labs, Inc. and GPC. In that regard, the
Company, in cooperation with its lenders, engaged an independent third party to
assist in the sale of all of the assets of the business.

As part of the plan, the Company anticipates that any proceeds realized
from the sale will be used to retire existing bank indebtedness and that the
fair value of the assets, less the costs of selling the assets, does not exceed
the liabilities associated with those assets and, as a result, the carrying
value of the assets has been reduced to zero.

The Company anticipates that a sale will be consummated within the next
fiscal year.

In addition, the net assets and operating results of the discontinued
operations were segregated in the consolidated financial statements for all
periods presented.

A summary of unusual charges which are included in loss from discontinued
operations during the current year is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31,
1996
---------------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C>
Product Development and Software $ 2,320
Inventory Revaluation 570
Other 237
-----------
$ 3,127
===========
</TABLE>

At fiscal year end, the investment in net assets of the discontinued
operations consisted of:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
------------------------------------------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,136 $ 4,388 $ 2,529
Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,387 1,783 1,849
Non-Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,032 9,769 7,757
Non-Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 781 629 12
------------ ----------------------------
$ -0- $ 11,745 $ 8,425
============ ============= ==============
</TABLE>

Net revenues of discontinued operations were $5,968, $6,045 and $5,942 in
fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

48
<PAGE> 51

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 4 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Medical
Technology Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries, MTS Packaging, Inc., Medical
Technology Laboratories, Inc., Clearwater Medical Services, Inc., Clinical
Diagnostic Center, Inc., Performance Pharmacy Systems, Inc., Medication
Management Systems, Inc., Medication Management Technologies, Inc., MTS Sales &
Marketing, Inc., and Systems Professionals, Inc. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain minor
reclassifications have been made in the Company's prior years consolidated
financial statements for comparability to the current year's statements.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Vangard Labs, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and Glasgow
Pharmaceutical Corporation, a 50% joint venture with Creighton Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., are treated as discontinued operations for all periods presented as set
forth in Note 3.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined
by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue as follows: when products are shipped by
MTS Packaging Systems, Inc.; when medication dispensing systems are placed into
service by Medication Managements Systems, Inc.; when pharmacy management
systems are placed into service by Performance Pharmacy Systems, Inc; when
services are performed by Medical Technology Laboratories, Inc. The company
recognizes revenues from the clinical laboratory services net of estimated
contractual adjustments resulting from the unpaid portion of the assigned
insurance billings and other third party payers, as services are performed.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Additions to and major
improvements of property and equipment are capitalized. Maintenance and
repair expenditures are charged to expense as incurred. As property and
equipment is sold or retired, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation
is eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss recorded. Depreciation
and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method based upon the
assets' estimated useful lives as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years
-----
<S> <C>
Transportation Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Computer Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Furniture and Fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Leasehold Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Machinery Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
</TABLE>

49
<PAGE> 52

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

Effective April 1, 1995, the Company reduced the estimated useful lives of
its property and equipment to reflect technological changes. The effect of
this change was to increase the net loss for 1996 by $589,000 ($.15 per share).

Software Development Cost

The Company capitalizes software development costs in accordance with the
guidelines set forth in FASB Statement No. 86. All costs associated with the
software development from the point of technological feasibility to its general
distribution to customers are capitalized and, subsequently, amortized.
Annually, the Company re-examines its amortization policy relating to its
software development cost. The Company has determined that a five-year period
is appropriate. This represents a change in estimates which does not have a
material effect on the Company's results of operations.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents amounts paid in excess of fair market value of assets
acquired by the Company in the purchase of other companies. These amounts are
amortized over a ten-year period.

Other Assets

Other assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization, which is
being provided on a straight-line basis over a five to seventeen year period.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Primary earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share and
earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share assuming full dilution
were computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted
for the incremental share attributed to outstanding warrants and options to
purchase Common Stock, if dilutive.

Income Taxes

Effective April 1, 1993, the Company adopted FASB No. 109, "Accounting for
Income Taxes." Under FASB No. 109, income taxes are provided for under the
liability method, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible
temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and
deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.
Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by
a valuation allowance when,

50
<PAGE> 53

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on
the date of enactment.

Treasury Stock

The Company records its treasury stock at cost.

Impact of New Accounting Standards

In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." With respect to stock
options granted to employees, SFAS No. 123 permits companies to continue using
the accounting method promulgated by the Accounting Principle's Board Opinion
No. 25 ("APB No. 25"), "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," to measure
compensation or to adopt the fair value based method prescribed by SFAS No.
123. If APB No. 25's method is continued, pro forma disclosures are required
as if SFAS No. 123's accounting provisions were followed. Management has
determined not to adopt SFAS No. 123's accounting recognition provisions
related to stock options granted to employees and accordingly, will continue
following APB No. 25's accounting provisions. All other requirements of SFAS
No. 123 will be implemented on April 1, 1996, the effect of which has not been
determined by management.

Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed of:

Effective fiscal year 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of." SFAS No. 121
requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held
and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of theses assets may not be
recoverable. In performing the review for recoverability, the Company estimates
the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their
eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows
(undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of
the assets, an impairment loss is recognized. Long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles to be disposed of are to be reported at the lower of
the carrying amount or the fair value less cost to sale, except for assets that
are related to discontinued operations which are reported at the lower of
carrying value or net realizable value.

If an impairment loss condition exists, the loss is determined as the
difference between the assets' carrying value and: (1) for assets held and used
- - - - - the discounted (at an interest rate commensurate with the related risk)
estimated cash flows over the expected recovery period of the related
investment (asset) determined at the Company's business unit or product line
level; (2) for assets to be disposed of - the fair value of the asset(s) less
the cost to sell.

Since the accounting methodology promulgated by SFAS No. 121 was similar to that
used prior to the Company's adoption of SFAS No. 121, there was no significant
effect to the Company's financial statements upon SFAS No. 121's adoption.

The Company's recognized impairment losses of $16,421,000 in fiscal 1996 and
$4,271,000 in fiscal 1995. These losses related to the early retirement of
certain production equipment and tooling, product development projects which
where suspended, and goodwill related to the acquisition of various businesses.

51
<PAGE> 54

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 5 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The Company maintains an allowance for potential losses on individual and
commercial accounts receivable. Management considers the allowances provided
to be reasonable.

Accounts Receivable consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ -------------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Accounts Receivable at Gross $ 3,788 $ 3,742 $ 2,686
Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (528) (167) (10)
------------ ------------ -------------
$ 3,260 $ 3,575 $ 2,676
============ ============ =============
</TABLE>

Substantially all of the Company's accounts receivable are pledged as
collateral on bank notes.

NOTE 6 - INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ -------------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Raw Material $ 661 $ 993 $ 716
Finished Goods and Work in Process 1,784 3,259 1,994
------------ ------------ -------------
$ 2,445 $ 4,252 $ 2,710
============ ============ =============
</TABLE>

Substantially all of the Company's inventories are pledged as collateral on
bank notes.

NOTE 7 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ -------------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Property and Equipment $ 7,273 $ 16,041 $ 13,144
Leasehold Improvements 806 817 687
------------ ------------ -------------
$ 8,079 $ 16,858 $ 13,831

Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization (3,162) (2,982) (2,186)
------------ ------------ -------------
$ 4,917 $ 13,876 $ 11,645
============ ============ =============
</TABLE>

Substantially all of the Company's property and equipment are pledged as
collateral on bank notes.

52
<PAGE> 55

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 8 - PRODUCT AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS, GOODWILL AND OTHER ASSETS

Software development costs, goodwill and other assets consists of the
following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- ----------
(In Thousands)

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Software Development Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ -0- $ 1,555 $ 1,353
Less: Accumulated Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- (249) (100)
----------- ----------- ----------
$ -0- $ 1,306 $ 1,253
=========== =========== ==========

Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,204 $ 2,943 $ 2,738
Less: Accumulated Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (233) (330) (98)
----------- ----------- ----------
$ 971 $ 2,613 $ 2,640
=========== =========== ==========

Product Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ -0- $ -0- $ 1,790
Less: Accumulated Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- -0- (273)
----------- ----------- ----------
$ -0- $ -0- $ 1,517
=========== =========== ==========

MedServ(TM) Development and Related Software . . . . . . . . . $ 212 $ 3,027 $ 1,043
Less: Accumulated Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (42) (15) -0-
----------- ----------- ----------
$ 170 $ 3,012 $ 1,043
=========== =========== ==========

Patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 873 $ 853 $ 416
Less: Accumulated Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (308) (93) (64)
----------- ----------- ----------
$ 565 $ 760 $ 352
=========== =========== ==========

Other Assets:
Acquisition of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 192 $ 219 $ -0-
Finance Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- 337 176
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 583 56
Less: Accumulated Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (23) (83) (50)
----------- ----------- ----------
$ 232 $ 1,056 $ 182
=========== =========== ==========
</TABLE>

Substantially all of the Company's intangible assets are pledged as collateral
on bank notes.

53
<PAGE> 56

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 9 - LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
----------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Note payable; interest at bank prime plus 1/2%; or LIBOR rate plus
2 1/4%; payable $93,000 per month plus interest, maturing
September, 1998, past due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,398 $ 9,595 $ 9,342

Bank line of credit, interest at bank prime plus 1/2%, or LIBOR
rate plus 2%; interest payable monthly; principal maturing
September, 1996, past due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,862 14,699 2,216

Seller Financing Under Tampa Pathology Acquisition Agreement,
face value of $971,000 discounted at 10%, with variable monthly
payments until satisfied, past due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 -0- -0-

Other Notes and Agreements; interest and principal payable monthly
and annual at various amounts through June 1998 . . . . . . . . . 545 95 9
----------- ---------- ----------
Total Long-Term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,676 24,389 11,567
Less Current Portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (168) (1,165) (979)
Subject to Compromise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (28,158) -0- -0-
----------- ---------- ----------
LONG-TERM DEBT DUE AFTER 1 YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 350 $ 23,224 $ 10,588
=========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>

The following is a schedule by year of the principal payments required on
these notes payable and long-term debts exclusive of debt subject to compromise
as of March 31, 1996:

(In Thousands)

The above bank loans and line of credit are collateralized by the
Company's accounts receivables, inventory, equipment and intangibles. The
prime rate at March 31, 1996 was 8.25%.

The Company has reported approximately $1.7 million in interest expense
for the year ended March 31, 1996. this excludes $.6 million that was not
accrued subsequent to filing Chapter 11, as required by generally accepted
accounting principles.

54
<PAGE> 57

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 10 - LEASE COMMITMENTS

The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental payments
required under operating leases that have an initial or remaining
non-cancelable lease term in excess of one year as of March 31, 1996.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In Thousands)
<S> <C>
1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 340
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 279
1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 279
2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ -0-
2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ -0-
</TABLE>

Rent expense amounted to $504,000, $422,000, and $236,000 for the years
ended March 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

NOTE 11 - 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN

During the year ended March 31, 1994, the Company established a 401(K)
profit sharing plan. The Plan covers substantially all of its employees.
Contributions are at the employees discretion and may be matched by the Company
up to certain limits. For the years ended March 31, 1995 and 1996, the Company
made no contributions to the Plan. The Company contributed $7,000 to the Plan
for the year ended March 31, 1994.

NOTE 12 - SELF INSURANCE PLAN

During the year ended March 31, 1993, the Company established a medical
health benefit self-insurance plan for substantially all of its employees. The
Company is reinsured for claims which exceed $30,000 per participant and has an
annual maximum aggregate limit of approximately $390,000.

NOTE 13 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Todd E. Siegel ("Siegel") is the Trustee of the Siegel Family QTIP Trust
(the "Trust") which is the general partner in JADE Partners, a significant
shareholder of the Company. The Trust has entered into an exclusive Technology
and Patent Licensing Agreement with the Company or certain technologies and
patents on machine and product designs.

Under the terms of the amended agreement, the Company is required to pay
to the Trust royalties of one percent of sales on licensed products. In
addition, the agreement states that there are no minimum royalty payments due
and the agreement would expire if the Company abandons or ceases to use the
technologies.

Siegel, through his beneficial interest in the Trust, owns approximately
10 percent of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company. In addition, Siegel
beneficially owns 6,500,000 shares of voting preferred stock which have two
votes per share for all matters submitted to the holders of the Common Stock of
the Company.

55
<PAGE> 58

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

Siegel had outstanding indebtedness to the Company at March 31, 1996 and
March 31, 1995 of approximately $12,000 and $8,000 respectively. The Company
expects to collect the full balance of this indebtedness.

During 1995, the Company paid a related company $16,750 for services
rendered in connection with the refinancing of the Company's debt.

NOTE 14 - TAXES

Loss from continuing operations of consolidated companies before income
tax benefit was approximately $24.6 million and $2.1 million during the years
ended March 31, 1996 and March 31, 1995 respectively. Income from continuing
operations of consolidated companies before income taxes was approximately $2.9
million during the year ended March 31, 1994. The components of related income
taxes provided on continuing operations were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended March 31,
---------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current Tax (Benefit) Due:
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (635) $ (1,277) $ 813
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -0- (208) 111
----------- ---------- ----------
(635) (1,485) 924
----------- ---------- ----------

Deferred Tax:
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,132) 547 100
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (133) 94 54
----------- ---------- ----------
(1,265) 641 154
----------- ---------- ----------
$ (1,900) $ (844) $ 1,078
=========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>

Total income tax (benefit) expense for 1996, 1995 and 1994 from continuing
operations resulted in effective tax rates of 7.7%, 39.9% and 36.7%,
respectively. The reasons for the differences between these effective tax
rates and the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% on the continuing operations are as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended March 31,
---------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Tax (Benefit) Expense at U.S. statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . $ (8,616) $ (741) $ 1,027
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,877
State and local income tax, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (543) (75) 109
Difference between marginal and U.S. statutory rate . . . . . . . . 246 21 (29)
Other (net) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 (49) (29)
----------- ---------- ----------
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (1,900) $ (844) $ 1,078
=========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>

56
<PAGE> 59

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 14 - TAXES (Cont'd)

Income taxes receivable as of March 31, 1996 and March 31, 1995 in the
amount of $880,000 and $808,000 represent refunds of federal and state taxes
previously paid.

During the year ended March 31, 1995, the Company had a tax net operating
loss of approximately $3.2 million. The Company elected to forgo carryback of
the loss so that the full amount of the net operating loss would be available
to offset future taxable income. This net operating loss carry forward will
expire in 2010 which included income from discontinued operations. In the
current year, the Company has a net operating loss of $21 million. A portion
of this loss has been carried back, and a receivable of $820,000 has been
recorded to reflect the anticipated refund. The unused loss of $17.8 million,
which will expire in 2011, plus the carryforward loss from the prior year of
$3.2 million will be available to offset future taxable income.

Effective April 1, 1993, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." The
cumulative effect of this accounting change on years prior to April 1, 1993,
was a benefit of approximately $543,000, which is included in the year ended
March 31, 1994 results of operations.

Deferred taxes and deferred tax asset resulted from differences in timing
of deductions recognized for tax and financial reporting purposes.

Deferred taxes for continuing operations consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
----------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Depreciation/Amortization Gross Deferred Tax Liability . . . . . . $ 379 $ 2,909 $ 1,366
----------- ---------- ----------

Depreciation/Amortization Temporary Difference . . . . . . . . . . (1,386) -0- -0-

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (73) (73) (55)

Inventory Valuation Allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (163) -0- -0-

Tax Loss Carry Forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5,525) (1,459) -0-

Reserves and Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (109) -0- -0-
----------- ---------- ----------

Gross Deferred Tax Asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7,256) (1,532) (55)
----------- ---------- ----------

Net Deferred Tax (asset) Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6,877) 1,377 1,311

Less Valuation Allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6,877) -0- -0-
----------- ---------- ----------

Deferred Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ -0- $ 1,377 $ 1,311
=========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>

57
<PAGE> 60

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 14 - TAXES (Cont'd)

The Internal Revenue Service has completed its examination of the
Company's consolidated federal income tax returns for the years ended March 31,
1993 and 1992. No deficiencies were proposed. No other income tax returns
have been examined by taxing authorities.

The Florida State Department of Revenue is examining the Company's sales
and use tax and intangible tax returns for the period January 1988 through
December 1993. The State Department of Revenue has proposed a suggested
assessment of $1,375,000 including taxes, penalties and interest. Although a
proposed assessment has been made, the Company has filed a request for
reconsideration which was granted. The Company believes the amount of
additional tax owed, if any, is substantially less than the State has proposed,
and intends to vigorously defend its position should a final assessment be
made.

NOTE 15 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) consists of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- -----------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Voting Preferred Stock:
Par value $.0001 per share
Authorized Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,500,000 7,500,000 7,500,000
Issued Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,500,000 6,500,000 6,500,000
Outstanding Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,500,000 6,500,000 6,500,000

Common Stock:
Par value $.01 per share
Authorized Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,000,000 25,000,000 25,000,000
Outstanding Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,445,335 3,986,832 3,968,332
Issued Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,485,335 4,026,832 4,008,332
</TABLE>

58
<PAGE> 61

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 15 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Cont'd)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
STOCK OPTIONS

Activity related to options is as follows:
Number of Shares Price Per Share
---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at March 31, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130,500 $1.00 - $6.00
Granted in Fiscal 1994:
Officers & Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,000 $1.63
Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,200 $4.00 - $10.00
---------------- ---------------

Outstanding at March 31, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220,700
Granted in Fiscal 1995:
Officers & Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99,000 $1.63
Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,226 $6.00 - $7.75
---------------- ---------------

Outstanding at March 31, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332,926
Granted in Fiscal 1996:
Officers & Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,000 $1.63
Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,808 $6.00 - $8.00
---------------- ---------------

Outstanding at March 31, 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,734 $1.00 - $10.00
================ ===============
</TABLE>

WARRANTS

Activity related to warrants is as follows:

<TABLE>
<Capiton>
Number of Shares Price Per Share
---------------- ---------------

<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at March 31, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,320,000 $7.00
Granted in Fiscal 1994 through Fiscal 1996 . . . . . . . -0-
---------------- ---------------
Outstanding at March 31, 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,320,000 $7.00
---------------- ---------------
</TABLE>

All of the warrants outstanding at March 31, 1996 expire in July 1997.
The options outstanding at March 31, 1996 expire on various dates commencing in
April 1998 and ending in March 2006.

During fiscal year 1995, the company entered into a stock appreciation
rights agreement with its Chief Executive Officer. The agreement, which is for
a term of 10 years, calls for additional compensation payable annually equal to
6.5% of the total of the incremental increase in the value of the Company's
outstanding stock.

No dividends have ever been paid on either the Company's Common or Preferred
Stock.

59
<PAGE> 62

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994

NOTE 16 - ACQUISITIONS

In March 1995, the Company acquired the rights and interests in certain
clinical laboratory services of Tampa Pathology Laboratory. The purchase
agreement provided that the total purchase price to be paid by the Company for
the rights and interests was determined based upon the actual revenues
associated with the services performed for designated customer accounts of
Tampa Pathology Laboratory for a period of time in 1996. The purchase price is
payable monthly based upon 25% of the actual revenues of former Tampa Pathology
Laboratory customer accounts.

The Company has estimated the total present value of the purchase price to
be approximately $971,000, based upon an estimated amortization period of 96
months discounted at 10%.

During 1996, the Company made payments, under the terms of the purchase
agreement, of approximately $131,000.

NOTE 17 - CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

The business of Medical Technology Laboratories, Inc. is primarily with
individuals located in the State of Florida, many of whom routinely assign to
the Company payment by their medical insurance providers. As of March 31,
1996, Medical Technology Laboratories, Inc.'s patient accounts receivable from
individuals and commercial medical insurance providers was approximately
$310,000. As of March 31, 1996, Medical Technology Laboratories, Inc.'s
accounts receivable from Medicare and Medicaid was approximately $467,000.

NOTE 18 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 16, 1996, the Company filed plans of reorganization with the
bankruptcy court for MTS Packaging Systems, Inc. and Medical Technology
Laboratories, Inc. On July 5, 1996, a reorganization plan was also filed by
the Company for Vangard Labs, Inc. On September 4, 1996, the Bankruptcy Court
approved the plan of reorganization.

NOTE 19 - SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company manufactures, markets and distributes medication dispensing
systems and supplies used by pharmacies in packaging medication in "punchcards"
for nursing homes and hospitals. The Company also supplies medical labels and
forms to this same industry. During November 1991, through two acquisitions,
the Company entered the clinical laboratory service business, which primarily
provides its diagnostic testing services to the medical profession. The
medication dispensing system segment provides all products and services other
than laboratory services, which is included in the Company's second business
segment, clinical laboratory services.

On June 1, 1992, the Company acquired all of the Common Stock of Vangard
Labs, Inc., which packages generic pharmaceuticals in individual unit doses for
the hospital market. This business segment of the Company, is reported as a
discontinued operation.

60
<PAGE> 63

The following is operating information for these industry segments for the
years ended March 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---------- ----------- -------------
(In Thousands, except Percentages)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue of each Segment:
Medication Dispensing Systems $ 11,900 $ 11,252 $ 9,018
Clinical Laboratory Services 5,152 3,578 3,283
---------- ----------- -------------
Total Revenue $ 17,052 $ 14,830 $ 12,301
========== =========== =============

Operating Profit (Loss) of each Segment:
Medication Dispensing Systems $ (12,530) $ 347 $ 2,761
Clinical Laboratory Services (4,411) 307 985
---------- ----------- -------------
Total Operating Profit (Loss) $ (16,941) $ 654 $ 3,746
========== =========== =============

Depreciation and Amortization Expense of
each Segment:
Medication Dispensing Systems $ 2,103 $ 877 $ 657
Clinical Laboratory Services 579 183 161
---------- ----------- -------------
Total Depreciation and Amortization $ 2,682 $ 1,060 $ 818
========== =========== =============

Identifiable Assets of each Segment:
Medication Dispensing systems $ 12,118 $ 26,611 $ 19,182
Clinical Laboratory Services 2,551 5,887 5,411
---------- ----------- -------------
Total Assets $ 14,669 $ 32,498 $ 24,593
========== =========== =============

Capital Expenditures of each Segment:
Medication Dispensing Systems $ 795 $ 2,403 $ 2,442
Clinical Laboratory Services 2 600 581
---------- ----------- -------------
Total Capital Expenditures $ 797 $ 3,003 $ 3,023
========== =========== =============

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
Medication Dispensing Systems $ 12,662 $ 3,471 $ -0-
Clinical Laboratory Services 3,759 800 -0-
---------- ----------- -------------
$ 16,421 $ 4,271 $ -0-
========== =========== =============

Percentage of Revenue
Generated by Subsidiary:
MTS Packaging Systems, Inc. 63% 66% 63%
Medical Technology Laboratories, Inc. 30% 24% 27%
Medication Management Systems, Inc. 3% 4% 0%
Performance Pharmacy Systems, Inc. 4% 6% 10%
---------- ----------- -------------
100% 100% 100%
========== =========== =============
</TABLE>

61
<PAGE> 64

NOTE 20 - CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following condensed combined financial information represents the
financial position and results of operation of the MTS debtors, MTS Packaging,
Inc., MTS Laboratories, Inc. and MTS Sales and Marketing, Inc.:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MTS Debtors
--------------------------------------------
(In Thousands)
March 31, March 31, March 31,
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,799 $ 5,848 $ 5,370
Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,574 2,257 4,867
Non-Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,309 15,206 19,520
Non-Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 26 11,687
Intercompany Payable (Receivable) . . . . . . . 12,659 13,853 (6,872)
Stockholders Equity (Deficit) . . . . . . . . . (6,022) 4,918 15,208

Income Statement Data:
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15,896 $ 13,411 $ 11,076
Cost of Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,918 7,006 5,043
Selling, General and Administrative . . . . . . 3,908 1,214 2,372
Product Development and Software Costs . . . . 473 800 -0-
Loss on Early Retirement of Fixed Assets . . . 8,049 -0- -0-
Loss on Inventory Revaluation . . . . . . . . . 431 -0- -0-
Goodwill Write-down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,902 -0- -0-
Depreciation and Amortization . . . . . . . . . 1,225 622 722
Interest, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 124 411
------------ ------------ ------------
Total Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . 26,942 9,766 8,548
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before
Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (11,046) $ 3,645 $ 2,528
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>

62
<PAGE> 65

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K/A to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.

Dated: January 29, 1997 By: /s/ Todd E. Siegel
-----------------------------------------
Todd E. Siegel (Chief Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

<TABLE>
<Capiton>
Signature Title Date
- - - - ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Todd E. Siegel Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, January 29, 1997
- - - - ---------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer
Todd E. Siegel

/s/ David Kazarian Director January 29, 1997
- - - - ----------------------------------
David Kazarian

/s/ Michael Conroy Director, Chief Financial Officer and Vice January 29, 1997
- - - - ---------------------------------- President
Michael Conroy

/s/ John Stanton Director and Vice Chairman of the Board of January 29, 1997
- - - - ---------------------------------- Directors
John Stanton

/s/ Ronald Rhodes Principal Accounting Officer and Controller January 29, 1997
- - - - ----------------------------------
Ronald Rhodes
</TABLE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END> MAR-31-1996
<CASH> 965
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 3,788
<ALLOWANCES> 528
<INVENTORY> 2,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 7,814
<PP&E> 8,079
<DEPRECIATION> 3,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 14,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2,408
<BONDS> 0
0
1
<COMMON> 55
<OTHER-SE> 8,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 14,669
<SALES> 17,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 17,052
<CGS> 10,665
<TOTAL-COSTS> 41,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 1,739
<INCOME-PRETAX> (24,617)
<INCOME-TAX> (1,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (22,717)
<DISCONTINUED> (11,863)
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (34,580)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (8.52)
<EPS-DILUTED> (8.52)

</TABLE>