ENSTAR INCOME GROWTH PROGRAM SIX A L P
8-K, 1997-07-29
CABLE & OTHER PAY TELEVISION SERVICES
Previous: INFORMATION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP, DEF 14A, 1997-07-29
Next: ENSTAR INCOME GROWTH PROGRAM SIX B L P, 8-K, 1997-07-29



                                
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K



                                 CURRENT REPORT
                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




                          Date of report: July 23, 1997
                        (Date of earliest event reported)


                    ENSTAR INCOME/GROWTH PROGRAM SIX-A, L.P.,
                          a Georgia limited partnership
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




            Georgia                   Commission File:            58-1755230
  (State or other jurisdiction           0-17687               (I.R.S. Employer
   of incorporation or                                       identification No.)
         organization)


                      10900 Wilshire Boulevard, 15th Floor
                          Los Angeles, California 90024
          (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)




                                 (310) 824-9990
                (Registrant's phone number, including area code)




<PAGE>


     Item 5. Other Events
        
          On or about July 11, 1997, Madison Partnership Liquidity Investors 36,
     L.L.C.  disseminated a letter stating its interest in acquiring up to 3,910
     units of limited  partnership  interests  in Enstar  Income/Growth  Program
     Six-A,  L.P. (the  "Registrant")  for a price of $40 per unit, less certain
     transaction  costs.  This offer was made without the consent or involvement
     of the  Registrant's  Corporate  General  Partner.  The  Corporate  General
     Partner has considered  this offer,  concluded  that it is inadequate  and,
     accordingly,  recommended  that  limited  partners  not  accept  the offer.
     Pursuant to Rule 14e-2  promulgated  under the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934,  as amended,  this  recommendation  and the General  Partner's  bases
     therefor were conveyed to limited  partners in a letter dated July 23, 1997
     which  is  filed as an  exhibit  hereto  and  incorporated  herein  by this
     reference.
          
          FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT ARE
     MADE  PURSUANT  TO  THE  SAFE  HARBOR  PROVISIONS  OF  SECTION  21E  OF THE
     SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.  INVESTORS ARE CAUTIONED THAT
     SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES INCLUDING,
     WITHOUT LIMITATION,  THE EFFECTS OF LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY CHANGES; THE
     POTENTIAL  OF  INCREASED   LEVELS  OF  COMPETITION  FOR  THE   PARTNERSHIP;
     TECHNOLOGICAL  CHANGES;  THE  PARTNERSHIP'S   DEPENDENCE  UPON  THIRD-PARTY
     PROGRAMMING;  THE ABSENCE OF UNITHOLDER PARTICIPATION IN THE GOVERNANCE AND
     MANAGEMENT OF THE PARTNERSHIP; THE MANAGEMENT FEES PAYABLE TO THE CORPORATE
     GENERAL PARTNER;  THE EXONERATION AND INDEMNIFICATION  PROVISIONS CONTAINED
     IN THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER; AND
     OTHER  POTENTIAL  CONFLICTS OF INTEREST  INVOLVING  THE  CORPORATE  GENERAL
     PARTNER AND ITS  AFFILIATES;  AND OTHER RISKS DETAILED FROM TIME TO TIME IN
     THE  PARTNERSHIP'S  ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND OTHER  PERIODIC  REPORTS
     FILED WITH THE COMMISSION.
        
        
     Item 7.   Financial Statements, Pro Forma 
               Financial Information and Exhibits
        
     (c) Exhibits
        
          5.1 Letter to Limited Partners dated July 23, 1997.
        
        
                                    * * * *

                                       2

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                              ENSTAR INCOME/GROWTH PROGRAM SIX-A, L.P.
                                  a Georgia limited partnership

                              By:  Enstar Communications Corporation
                                   General Partner



Date: July 23, 1997.          By:    /s/ Michael K. Menerey
                              ------------------------------
                              Michael K. Menerey
                              Chief Financial Officer








                                        3
<PAGE>
        
        
                                                     Sequentially
                                                       Numbered
               Exhibit           Description             Page
               -------           -----------             ----
                                                  
                                                  
                 5.1          Letter to Limited           5
                                Partners dated    
                                July 23, 1997     
 







                                                 
                                       4
 


                               (Enstar Letterhead)






July 23, 1997


Dear Limited Partner:

     Enstar  Income/Growth  Program Six-A, Ltd. (the  "Partnership")  has become
aware  that  an  unsolicited   offer  for  up  to   approximately   3,910  units
(representing  approximately  4.9% of the outstanding Units in the Partnership),
at a price of $40 per Unit,  was  commenced  by  Madison  Partnership  Liquidity
Investors 36, L.L.C. ("Madison") in a letter dated July 11, 1997. This offer was
made without the consent or the involvement of the Corporate General Partner.

     Pursuant to rule 14e-2 under the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  we are
required to furnish you with our position with respect to the Madison offer.  We
have  considered  this offer and,  based on the very  limited  information  made
available by Madison,  believe that it is inadequate,  not representative of the
inherent value of the Partnership's  cable systems and not in your best interest
to accept.  Accordingly,  the Corporate General Partner's recommendation is that
you  reject  the  Madison  offer.  We  urge  you not to sign  the  Agreement  of
Assignment  Form that  Madison sent to you and not tender your Units to Madison.
In evaluating the offer, the Corporate General Partner believes that its limited
partners should consider the following information:

*         The  offering  price for each  limited  partnership  unit  during  the
     offering period was $250 per unit. Cash  distributions of approximately $42
     per unit were paid from  formation  through  May 11,  1993,  at which  time
     distributions were terminated to preserve cash resources.  In contrast, the
     Madison  offer is only $40 per unit.  If  Madison is  successful  in buying
     Units at the bargain basement price in its offer, Madison will own units at
     much lower prices than  virtually  all of the current  partners and, in our
     view,  for much less than they are worth.  For example,  lLimited  partners
     should  note that the  Partnership's  cash flow  (operating  income  before
     depreciation  and  amortization)  for the twelve months ended September 30,
     1996 was  approximately  $16 per  unit.  The  Madison  offer  represents  a
     valuation of only  approximately 5.6 times said cash flow (after adjustment
     for the excess of total liabilities over current assets as of September 30,
     1996).

*         As of the date of this letter,  the Corporate General Partner believes
     that a  reasonable  range of  valuation  per  limited  partnership  unit is
     between $36 and $68 based on the factors noted below. The Corporate General
     Partner  did not  retain a third  party to  conduct  an  evaluation  of the
     Partnership's  assets or otherwise obtain any appraisals.  Rather,  the per
     unit  valuations  provided were derived by attributing a range of multiples
     to the Partnership's  cash flow (operating  income before  depreciation and
     amortization) for the twelve months ended September 30, 1996,  adjusted for
     the excess of total liabilities over current assets.  The Corporate General
     Partner has selected  market  multiples  based on, among other things,  its
     understanding  of the  multiples  placed  on other  transactions  involving
     comparable cable  television  properties and the securities of companies in
     that industry.  The Corporate  General Partner's belief as to the valuation
     range  provided is  necessarily  based on economic,  industry and financial
     market conditions as they exist as of the date of this letter, all of which
<PAGE>
     are subject to change, and there can be no assurance that the Partnership's
     cable  properties  could  actually  be sold at a price  within  this range.
     Additionally,  the valuations  provided do not give effect to any brokerage
     or other  transaction fees that might be incurred by the Partnership in any
     actual sale of the Partnership's system.

*         Based on the information  received by the Corporate  General  Partner,
     the $40 per unit offer by  Madison  is less than the price for which  units
     were  recently  sold on the  secondary  market.  Partnership  Spectrum,  an
     independent industry publication, has reported that between May 1, 1997 and
     June 30, 1997, 20 units were sold on the secondary  market at approximately
     $48 per unit. In the General Partner's  opinion,  the fact that the Madison
     offer is being made at a discount  from the most  recent  secondary  market
     price  available  to the  General  Partner  only serves to  underscore  the
     inadequacy of the Madison offer. In addition,  the General Partner believes
     that  the  price  for  units in the  secondary  market  is not an  accurate
     reflection  of the fair market value of such units due to the low volume of
     transactions  in that limited market and the legal and tax  restrictions on
     such transfers.  Should  unitholders wish to sell their units,  there are a
     number of independent firms that trade interests of limited  partnership on
     the secondary market, including:

          Napex                         American Partnership Services
          800-356-2739                  800-736-9797

          Cuyler & Associates           Nationwide Partnership Marketplace 
          800-274-9991                  800-969-8996

          DCC Securities                Chicago Partnership Board
          800-945-0440                  800-272-6273

     For the reasons  discussed  above,  the Corporate  General Partner believes
that the Madison offer is not in the best  interest of the limited  partners and
recommends  that you NOT  transfer,  agree to  transfer,  or tender any units in
response to Madison's offer.

     If you have any  questions  regarding  these  matters  or your  investment,
please call our Investor Services Department at (800) 433-4287.

Sincerely,

Enstar Income/Growth Program Six-A, Ltd.
A Georgia Limited Partnership


cc:  Account Representative


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission