SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant [x]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission
[x] Definitive Proxy Statement Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
Microchip Technology Incorporated
---------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
[x] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
________________________________________________________________________
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
________________________________________________________________________
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined:
________________________________________________________________________
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
________________________________________________________________________
(5) Total fee paid:
________________________________________________________________________
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid: _______________
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: ________________
(3) Filing Party: ________________
(4) Date Filed: __________________
<PAGE>
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
August 10, 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Microchip Technology Incorporated, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), will be held at 9:00 a.m. local time on
Monday, August 10, 1998, at the Company's facility at 1200 South 52nd Street,
Tempe, Arizona, for the following purposes:
1. To elect directors to serve until the next annual meeting of
stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified;
2. To ratify the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as the independent
auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1999; and
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting
or any adjournment thereof.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy
Statement accompanying this Notice.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on June 12, 1998 are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.
All stockholders are cordially invited to personally attend the meeting.
To assure your representation at the meeting, however, you are urged to mark,
sign, date and return the enclosed proxy as promptly as possible in the
postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose. Any stockholder attending
the meeting may vote in person even if he or she previously has returned a
proxy.
Sincerely,
/s/ C. Philip Chapman
C. Philip Chapman
Secretary
Chandler, Arizona
July 6, 1998
<PAGE>
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
2355 West Chandler Boulevard
Chandler, Arizona 85224-6199
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROXY STATEMENT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOTING AND OTHER MATTERS
General
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of Microchip Technology
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), by the Company's board of
directors (the "Board of Directors") for use at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m. local time on Monday, August 10, 1998 (the
"Meeting"), or at any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in this
Proxy Statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. The Meeting will be held at the Company's facility at 1200 South
52nd Street, Tempe, Arizona.
These proxy solicitation materials were first mailed on or about July 6,
1998, to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Meeting.
Voting Securities and Voting Rights
Stockholders of record at the close of business on June 12, 1998 (the
"Record Date") are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting. On the
Record Date, 50,779,101 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding.
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the
total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date
constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Meeting. Shares
that are voted "FOR," "AGAINST," or "WITHHELD FROM" a matter are treated as
being present at the Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum and are also
treated as shares entitled to vote at the Meeting (the "Votes Cast") with
respect to such matter. Each stockholder voting at the Meeting, either in
person or represented by proxy, may cast one vote per share of Common Stock
held on all matters to be voted on at the Meeting. Assuming that a quorum is
present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the Votes Cast is required for
the ratification of the appointment of the Company's independent auditors. In
the election of directors, the four nominees receiving the highest number of
affirmative votes shall be elected as directors. Votes withheld from any
director are counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but
have no other legal effect under Delaware law.
Voting of Proxies; Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes
Votes cast in person or by proxy at the Meeting will be tabulated by the
election inspector(s) appointed for the Meeting. When a proxy is properly
executed and returned, the shares it represents will be voted at the Meeting as
directed. Any proxy that is returned using the form of proxy enclosed and that
is not marked as to a particular item will be voted: (i) "FOR" the election of
each of the nominees set forth in this Proxy Statement; (ii) "FOR" approval of
each of the other matters presented to stockholders in this Proxy Statement;
and (iii) as the proxy holders deem advisable on other matters that may come
before the Meeting. A stockholder may indicate on the enclosed proxy or its
substitute that it is abstaining from voting on a particular matter (an
"abstention"). A broker may indicate on the enclosed proxy or its substitute
that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on a
particular matter (a "broker non-vote"). Abstentions and broker non-votes are
each tabulated separately. The election
<PAGE>
inspector(s) will determine whether a quorum is present at the Meeting. In
general, Delaware law provides that a majority of the shares entitled to vote,
present in person or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum. Abstentions
and broker non-votes of shares that are entitled to vote are treated as shares
that are present in person or represented by proxy for purposes of determining
the presence of a quorum. In determining whether a proposal has been approved,
abstention of shares that are entitled to vote are treated as Votes Cast with
respect to such proposal, but not as voting for such proposal and hence have
the same effect as votes against such proposal; broker non-votes of shares that
are entitled to vote are not treated as Votes Cast with respect to the
particular proposal on which the broker has expressly not voted, and hence have
no effect on the outcome of the voting on a proposal that requires a majority
of the Votes Cast. However, with respect to a proposal that requires a majority
of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, a broker non-vote has the same
effect as a vote against the proposal.
Revocability of Proxies
Any person giving a proxy may revoke the proxy at any time before its use
by delivering to the Company written notice of revocation or a duly executed
proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Meeting and voting in person.
Solicitation
The Company will pay all expenses of this solicitation. In addition, the
Company may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial
owners of shares for expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation materials to
such beneficial owners. Proxies also may be solicited by certain of the
Company's directors and officers, personally or by telephone, without
additional compensation. The Company may also, at its sole expense, retain a
proxy solicitation firm to assist in the distribution of proxy solicitation
materials and in the collection of proxies. If so, the Company believes that
the expense will not exceed $15,000.
2
<PAGE>
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees
A board of four directors is to be elected at the Meeting. Unless
otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them
for each of the nominees named below. All of the nominees are currently
directors of the Company. In the event that any such nominee is unable or
declines to serve as a director at the time of the Meeting, the proxies will be
voted for any nominee designated by the current Board of Directors to fill the
vacancy. It is not expected that any nominee will be unable or will decline to
serve as a director. The term of office of each person elected as a director at
the Meeting will continue until the next annual meeting of stockholders and
until a successor has been elected and qualified.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the nominees
for director of the Company:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Position(s) Held
- ---- --- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Steve Sanghi ........................... 42 Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Albert J. Hugo-Martinez(l)(2) .......... 52 Director
L.B. Day(1) ............................ 53 Director
Matthew W. Chapman(2) .................. 47 Director
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) Member of the Compensation Committee
(2) Member of the Audit Committee
Mr. Sanghi is currently, and has been since August, 1990, President of the
Company, since October, 1991, Chief Executive Officer and since October, 1993,
Chairman of the Board of Directors. He has served as a director of the Company
since August, 1990. He served as the Company's Chief Operating Officer from
August, 1990 through October, 1991 and as Senior Vice President of Operations
from February, 1990 through August, 1990. Mr. Sanghi is also a director of
ADFlex Solutions, Inc., a U.S. supplier of flexible circuit-based interconnect
solutions.
Mr. Hugo-Martinez has served as a director of the Company since October,
1990. Since March, 1996, he has served as President and Chief Executive Officer
and a member of the Board of Directors of GTI Corporation, a manufacturer of
ISDN and local area network subcomponents. From 1987 to 1995, he served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation, a
manufacturer of high-performance bipolar and biCMOS gate arrays.
Mr. Day has served as a director since December, 1994. Since 1976, he has
served as President of L.B. Day & Company, Inc. (formerly Day-Floren
Associates, Inc.), a management consulting firm specializing in organizational
structure, development and strategic planning.
Mr. Chapman has served as a director since May, 1997. Since 1988, he has
served as Chief Executive Officer of CFI ProServices, Inc., a supplier of
integrated software solutions and services to financial institutions throughout
the United States ("CFI"), and since 1991, he has also served as Chairman of
CFI. Mr. Chapman served as a director of Phoenix Gold International, a
Portland, Oregon-based manufacturer of automotive audio equipment through
November 24, 1997.
------------
The Company wishes to express its gratitude and appreciation for the
contributions of Mr. Jon H. Beedle, who has served as a director of the Company
since October, 1993. Mr. Beedle has decided not to stand for re-election to the
Board of Directors. In 1995, Mr. Beedle retired as President of IN-STAT, Inc.,
a leading high technology market research firm, a position in which he had
served since 1981. During Mr. Beedle's tenure on the Board of Directors, he
provided valuable guidance and insight to the Company during a period of
substantial growth.
3
<PAGE>
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors
The Company's By-Laws authorize the Board of Directors to appoint from
among its members one or more committees comprised of one or more directors.
The Board of Directors has appointed a standing Audit Committee, currently
comprised of directors Hugo-Martinez, Chapman and Jon H. Beedle, and a standing
Compensation Committee, currently comprised of directors Hugo-Martinez and Day.
The Company does not have a nominating committee or any committee that performs
the functions of a nominating committee. The Audit Committee is primarily
responsible for appointing the Company's independent accounting firm and for
reviewing and evaluating the Company's accounting principles and its systems of
internal controls. The Audit Committee also reviews the annual financial
statements, significant accounting and tax issues and the scope of the annual
audit with the Company's independent auditors. The Compensation Committee
reviews and acts on all matters relating to compensation levels and benefit
plans for the Company's key executives. See "Board Compensation Committee
Report on Executive Compensation," below.
The Board of Directors met seven times during the fiscal year ended March
31, 1998. The Company's Audit Committee met twice, and the Company's
Compensation Committee met five times, during the fiscal year ended March 31,
1998. Mr. Chapman was appointed to the Board of Directors on May 19, 1997. Mr.
Chapman has attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate number of Board of
Directors' and Audit Committee meetings held during the fiscal year ended March
31, 1998 subsequent to his appointment to the Board of Directors.
Director Compensation and Other Information
Director Fees
Directors receive a $10,000 annual retainer, paid in quarterly
installments, and $1,000 per meeting for each regular and special Board of
Directors meeting. No compensation is paid for telephonic meetings of the Board
of Directors or for meetings of committees of the Board of Directors.
Stock Options
Under the terms of the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan, each non-employee
director is automatically granted an option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common
Stock upon his or her first election to the Board of Directors, and an
additional option to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock as of the first
business day of the month in which the annual stockholders' meeting is held. On
July 1, 1997, each of directors Hugo-Martinez, Day, Chapman and Jon H. Beedle
was granted an option to acquire 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $29.875, such options to vest in a series of 12 equal and successive
monthly installments commencing one month after the grant date.
4
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary of Cash and Other Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation for the three fiscal years
ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 earned by the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and each of the Company's five other most highly compensated executive
officers whose salary plus bonus for fiscal 1998 exceeded $100,000 for services
rendered in all capacities to the Company (collectively, the "Named Executive
Officers"):
Summary Compensation
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual Compensation
-------------------------------- Long-Term
Compensation
------------
Awards
------
Securities All Other
Bonus Underlying Compensation
Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($) ($)(1) Options/SARs (#) ($)(2)
- --------------------------- ---- ---------- ------ ---------------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Steve Sanghi, 1998 $365,548 $40,607 85,000 $191,166
President and Chief 1997 342,693 11,346 165,000 272,542
Executive Officer 1996 329,423 9,807 75,000 168,723
Robert A. Lanford, 1998 190,338 37,091 22,000 37,560
Vice President, 1997 176,632 46,489 39,000 37,267
Worldwide Sales(3) 1996 170,985 50,886 18,000 28,958
Timothy B. Billington, 1998 181,490 59,695 24,000 0
Vice President, 1997 171,267 72,681 56,250 0
Manufacturing 1996 165,790 50,554 22,500 0
Operations
George P. Rigg, 1998 175,350 5,396 20,000 38,587
Vice President, 1997 172,299 5,692 47,250 63,540
Advanced 1996 166,730 4,952 22,500 49,148
Microcontroller and
Technology Division
C. Philip Chapman, 1998 165,449 5,107 24,000 51,336
Vice President, 1997 155,097 5,145 45,750 62,683
Chief Financial Officer 1996 148,240 4,414 19,500 37,125
Mitchell R. Little, 1998 164,996 27,953 24,000 25,825
Vice President, 1997 154,760 33,237 45,000 33,785
Americas Sales(4) 1996 148,077 4,423 18,000 40,350
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) Includes portion of MICP bonus and cash bonus payments under the Company's
cash bonus plan earned in year shown but not paid until the following
year. See "Board Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation,"
below for descriptions of the MICP bonus program and the cash bonus plan.
(2) Except as otherwise noted, consists of: (i) the Company-matching
contributions to the Company's 401(k) retirement savings plan, which were
$2,557 for Mr. Sanghi, $2,920 for Mr. Lanford, $0 for Mr. Billington,
$2,838 for Mr. Rigg, $2,828 for Mr. Chapman, and $2,837 for Mr. Little;
and (ii) an additional payment by the Company in connection with a
split-dollar life insurance program which is distributable to the
individual executive officer when he is no longer an employee of the
Company, in the amount of $188,609 for Mr. Sanghi, $34,640 for Mr.
Lanford, $0 for Mr. Billington, $35,749 for Mr. Rigg, $48,508 for Mr.
Chapman and $22,988 for Mr. Little. See "Board Compensation Committee
Report on Executive Compensation," below for a description of the
split-dollar life insurance program.
(3) Mr. Lanford retired from the Company effective March 31, 1998.
(4) Mr. Little became Vice President, Americas Sales as of April 1, 1998.
Immediately prior, Mr. Little served as Vice President of the Company's
Standard Microcontroller and ASSP Division.
5
<PAGE>
Equity Compensation Plans
The 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan
(the "Plans")
Under the Plans, the Company's primary equity incentive program, key
employees, non-employee members of the Board of Directors and independent
contractors who provide valuable services to the Company may be granted
incentive stock options or non-statutory stock options to purchase shares of
Common Stock at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the
option shares on the grant date. Options granted under the Plans vest over the
period determined by the Board of Directors at the date of grant, at periods
generally ranging from one year to four years. Generally, if the Company is
acquired by merger, consolidation or asset sale, outstanding options that are
not assumed by the successor corporation or otherwise replaced with a
comparable option will automatically accelerate and become exercisable in full.
Any options so assumed may be accelerated if the optionee's employment is
terminated within a designated period following the acquisition. In connection
with a change in control of the Company by tender offer or proxy contest for
board membership, the Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors can
accelerate outstanding options. At March 31, 1998, options to acquire 6,204,294
shares of Common Stock were outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of
$14.84 per share, and options to acquire 4,887,709 shares of Common Stock were
available for grant under the Plans.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan")
The Purchase Plan allows eligible employees of the Company to purchase
shares of Common Stock at semi-annual intervals through periodic payroll
deductions. The purchase price per share for an eligible employee who
participates in the Purchase Plan is the lower of (i) 85% of the fair market
value of a share of Common Stock on the employee's entry date into the
then-current offering period under the Purchase Plan or (ii) 85% of the fair
market value of a share of Common Stock on the semi-annual purchase date.
Option Grants
The following table contains information concerning the grant of stock
options to the Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended March 31,
1998:
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants
-------------------------------------------------------- Potential Realizable
Percent Value at Assumed
Number of of Total Annual Rates of Stock
Securities Options Price Appreciation for
Underlying Granted to Option Term
Options Employees Exercise or ---------------------------
Granted in Fiscal Base Price Expiration
Name (#)(1) Year ($/sh) Date 5% ($)(2) 10% ($)(2)
- ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Steve Sanghi .............. 85,000 5.3% $ 30.25 4/17/07 $1,617,045 $4,097,910
Robert A. Lanford ......... 22,000 1.4% 30.25 4/17/07 418,529 1,060,636
Timothy B. Billington ..... 24,000 1.5% 30.25 4/17/07 456,578 1,157,057
George P. Rigg ............ 20,000 1.2% 30.25 4/17/07 380,481 964,214
C. Philip Chapman ......... 24,000 1.5% 30.25 4/17/07 456,578 1,157,057
Mitchell R. Little ........ 24,000 1.5% 30.25 4/17/07 456,578 1,157,057
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) Each stock option becomes exercisable over a one-year vesting period, in 12
successive monthly installments commencing on July 1, 2001, and has a
maximum term of 10 years from the date of grant. Vesting may be
accelerated under certain circumstances in connection with an acquisition
of the Company or a change of control. The exercise price may be paid in
cash, in shares of Common Stock valued at fair market value on the
exercise date or through a cashless exercise procedure involving a
same-day sale of the purchased shares.
(2) No assurance can be given that the actual stock price appreciation over the
10-year option term will be at the assumed 5% and 10% levels or at any
other defined level. The rates of appreciation are specified by rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and are for
illustrative purposes only; they do not represent the Company's estimate
of future stock price. Unless the market price of the Common Stock does,
in fact, appreciate over the option term, no value will be realized from
the option grant. The exercise price of each of the options was equal to
the closing sales price of the Common Stock as quoted on the NASDAQ Stock
Market on the date of grant.
6
<PAGE>
Option Exercises and Holdings
The following table provides information on option exercises in the fiscal
year ended, and option holdings at, March 31, 1998, by the Named Executive
Officers and the value of such officers' unexercised options at March 31, 1998:
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year
and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Value of Unexercised
Shares Options In-The-Money Options
Acquired on Value At March 31, 1998 (#) At March 31, 1998 ($)(2)
Name Exercise (#) Realized ($)(1) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable(1) Unexercisable
- ---- ------------ --------------- ----------- ------------- -------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Steve Sanghi .............. 50,000 $1,610,900 598,750 475,000 $8,220,054 $1,772,993
Robert A. Lanford ......... 40,196 1,059,848 21,095 0 153,538 0
Timothy B. Billington ..... 39,045 797,923 32,621 147,750 420,240 560,025
George P. Rigg ............ 50,000 1,362,830 31,075 134,750 282,853 522,522
C. Philip Chapman ......... 35,000 1,181,428 45,385 119,250 701,724 407,352
Mitchell R. Little ........ 36,000 835,578 4,688 124,500 34,123 458,937
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) Calculated based on the market price per share of the Common Stock at date
of exercise multiplied by the number of shares issued upon exercise less
the total exercise price of the options exercised.
(2) Calculated based on $21.00 per share, which was the closing sales price per
share of the Common Stock as quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market on March
31, 1998, multiplied by the number of applicable shares in-the-money less
the total exercise price for such shares.
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements
The Company has not entered into employment contracts with any of the
Named Executive Officers. Each of the Named Executive Officers has entered into
an Executive Officer Severance Agreement with the Company (the "Severance
Agreement"). The Severance Agreement provides for the automatic acceleration in
vesting of all unvested stock options upon the first to occur of any of the
following events: (i) as of the date immediately preceding a change of control
in the event any such stock options are or will be terminated or canceled
(except by mutual consent) or any successor to the Company fails to assume and
agree to perform all such stock option agreements at or prior to such time as
any such person becomes a successor to the Company; (ii) as of the date
immediately preceding such change of control in the event the executive does
not or will not receive upon exercise of such executive's stock purchase rights
under any such stock option agreement the same identical securities and/or
other consideration as is received by all other stockholders in any merger,
consolidation, sale, exchange or similar transaction occurring upon or after
such change of control; (iii) as of the date immediately preceding any
involuntary termination of such executive occurring upon or after any such
change of control; or (iv) as of the date six months following the first such
change of control, provided that the executive shall have remained an employee
of the Company continuously throughout such six-month period. For purposes of
the Severance Agreement, "change of control" means the occurrence of any of the
following events: (a) any "person" (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and
14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended [the "Exchange Act"]),
is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the
Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company
representing 50% or more of the total voting power represented by the Company's
then outstanding voting securities; or (b) a change in the composition of the
Board of Directors as a result of which fewer than a majority of the directors
are "Incumbent Directors." "Incumbent Directors" means directors who either (A)
are directors of the Company as of the date the Severance Agreement was entered
into, or (B) are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board of Directors
with the affirmative votes (either by a specific vote or by approval of the
proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for
election as a director without objection to such nomination) of at least
three-quarters of the Incumbent Directors at the time of such election or
nomination (but shall not include an individual whose election or nomination is
in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the
election of directors of the Company); or (c) the
7
<PAGE>
stockholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company
with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would
result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior
thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being
converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 50% of the
total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such
surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or
the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the
Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or
substantially all the Company's assets.
Board Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee; General
The Board of Directors maintains a Compensation Committee (the
"Committee") comprised of one or more outside directors. The Committee is
presently comprised of Messrs. Hugo-Martinez and Day. The Committee, with input
from directors Chapman, Sanghi and Jon H. Beedle, conducted performance reviews
for fiscal 1998, and made compensation decisions for fiscal 1999, with respect
to the Company's executive officers other than Mr. Sanghi. The Committee, with
input from directors Chapman and Jon H. Beedle, conducted the performance
review for fiscal 1998, and made compensation decisions for fiscal 1999, with
respect to Mr. Sanghi. Mr. Sanghi does not participate in deliberations
relating to his own compensation.
The Stock Option Committee
The Board of Directors also maintains a Stock Option Committee comprised
of two or more outside directors. The Stock Option Committee administers the
Plans and determines, within the confines of the Plans, the timing, amount and
vesting of stock options to be granted to the Company's executive officers.
Messrs. Hugo-Martinez and Day currently comprise the Stock Option Committee.
Compensation Policy
The Company bases its compensation policy on a pay-for-performance
philosophy for all corporate officers and key employees. This philosophy
emphasizes variable compensation, primarily by setting base salaries after a
review of average base salary levels of comparable companies in the
semiconductor industry, with an opportunity to enhance total compensation
through various incentives. The Company believes that this philosophy
successfully aligns an executive's total compensation with the Company's
business objectives and performance and the interests of the stockholders, and
serves to attract, retain and reward individuals who contribute both to the
Company's short-term and long-term success. Compensation decisions also include
subjective determinations and a consideration of various factors with the
weight given to a particular factor varying from time to time and in various
individual cases. The Company believes that its overall pay-for-performance
philosophy fosters a team environment among the Company's management that
focuses their energy on achieving the Company's financial and performance
objectives, consistent with the Company's guiding values.
The Committee believes that the overall compensation levels for the
Company's executive officers for fiscal 1998 are consistent with the Company's
pay-for-performance philosophy and are reasonable in light of the Company's
fiscal 1998 performance. Fiscal 1998 was marked by continued overcapacity in the
semiconductor industry and severe financial crises in numerous Asian economies.
The combination of industry overcapacity and the Asian financial crisis affected
the semiconductor industry as a whole, and manifested itself in disappointing
revenue and earnings performances by many such companies. Overall, the
semiconductor industry achieved a revenue growth rate of only 0.5%(1) for the
period ended December 31, 1997. Despite industry conditions, the Company's net
sales increased 19% and 17% fiscal 1998 and 1997, respectively; its net income
increased 26% and 17% in fiscal 1998 and 1997, respectively; and its return on
average equity was 20.5% and 23.0% in fiscal 1998 and 1997, respectively.
- ------------
(1)Source -- Semiconductor Industry Association.
8
<PAGE>
Elements of Compensation
There are currently four major elements of the Company's executive
compensation program: annual base salary, incentive cash bonuses and long-term
compensation programs, stock options, and compensation and employee benefits
generally available to all Company employees.
Base Salaries. The Committee establishes annual base salaries for the
Company's executive officers at the beginning of each fiscal year, primarily by
considering the salaries of executive officers in similar positions with
comparably-sized companies (the "Reference Group"). The Reference Group
currently consists of six companies that have annual sales of $300 million to
$1.0 billion, have market capitalizations of between $400 million and $4.0
billion, and operate in recognized market segments, such as logic, memory and
mixed-signal, within the semiconductor industry. Monitoring the Reference Group
provides a stable and continuing frame of reference for reviewing and setting
base salary compensation. The composition of the Reference Group is subject to
change from year to year based on the Committee's assessment of comparability,
including the extent to which the Reference Group reflects changes occurring
within the Company and in the semiconductor industry as a whole. The six
Reference Group companies also comprise the Peer Group used in the performance
graph. See "Performance Graph," below. In addition, consistent with the
Company's pay-for-performance philosophy, the Committee reviews the performance
objectives for the Company as a whole for the immediately preceding fiscal year
and the upcoming fiscal year, as well as the performance objectives for each of
the individual officers relative to their respective areas of responsibility
for both periods. Performance objectives are initially developed by the
individual officers, in conjunction with their respective operating units, and
then discussed with and approved by the Chief Executive Officer to generate the
Company's annual operating plan ("AOP"). The Board of Directors then reviews
and approves the AOP. In setting base salaries, the Committee also considers
subjective factors such as an executive's experience and tenure in the industry
and perceived value of the executive's position to the Company as a whole.
After consideration of all of the above-described factors, average base
salaries for the Company's executive officers increased 6% in fiscal 1998.
Incentive Cash Bonuses and Long-Term Compensation Programs. Incentive cash
bonuses may be payable to the Company's officers, managers and other key
employees under the Company's Management Incentive Compensation Plan ("MICP").
The Board of Directors approved the MICP for fiscal 1998 as part of the fiscal
1998 AOP at the beginning of fiscal 1998. The MICP is an aggregate bonus pool
derived from a percentage of the Company's annual operating profit. This bonus
pool may then be allocated among the eligible participants based upon the
achievement of individual performance objectives and various subjective
determinations, with no particular weight being assigned to any one factor. The
Board of Directors and the Committee generally give Mr. Sanghi wide discretion
with respect to the designation of employees eligible to participate in the
MICP and the amount of any MICP bonus to be awarded to each participant,
including executive officers other than himself. The Committee determines the
amount of the MICP bonus, if any, to be awarded to Mr. Sanghi. In fiscal 1998,
approximately 210 employees, including the executive officers and the Chief
Executive Officer, participated in the MICP.
In conjunction with the MICP, the executive officers are eligible to
participate in a program designed to provide longer term compensation to the
executive officers. In light of the importance of retaining the executive
officers in the Company's long-term employ and in order to provide an
alternative to immediately taxable cash bonuses, in fiscal 1995 the Committee
created a longer term benefit for key executives in the form of a split-dollar
life insurance program. The split-dollar life insurance program provides key
officers with an incentive to remain in the long-term employ of the Company, an
insurance benefit, and a cash value benefit payable in the future when the
executive is no longer in the Company's employ. The Committee determines what
portion of an executive's overall MICP cash bonus will be paid in cash or into
the split-dollar life insurance program. During fiscal 1998, five of the
executive officers, including Mr. Sanghi, participated in the split-dollar life
insurance program. See the "Summary Compensation Table" and the footnotes
thereto, above.
Numerous objective and subjective factors were considered in establishing
the total MICP bonus compensation for fiscal 1998, including the Company's
sales and net income growth, and return on equity. MICP bonuses for fiscal 1998
were paid at the rate of 64% of the total MICP bonus pool established in
9
<PAGE>
the fiscal 1998 AOP. As a result, the average MICP bonus for the Company's six
executive officers, excluding Mr. Sanghi, was approximately 24.9% of base
salary, a percentage decrease of approximately 26.1% in fiscal 1998 as compared
to fiscal 1997 when the average MICP bonus for such officers, excluding Mr.
Sanghi, was approximately 33.7% of base salary. See the "Summary Compensation
Table" and footnotes thereto, above. The Committee believes that the MICP bonus
compensation for fiscal 1998 is consistent with the Company's
pay-for-performance philosophy and is commensurate with the Company's overall
performance, as well as the fiscal 1998 AOP objectives.
Stock Options. The Company believes that executive officers, other
corporate officers and key employees should hold substantial, long-term equity
stakes in the Company so that their collective interests will coincide with the
interests of the stockholders. Thus, stock options constitute a significant
portion of the Company's incentive compensation program. At March 31, 1998,
approximately 51% of the Company's employees worldwide held options to purchase
Common Stock. In granting stock options to executive officers, the Stock Option
Committee considers numerous factors, such as the individual's position and
responsibilities with the Company, the individual's future potential to
influence the Company's mid- and long-term growth, the vesting schedule of the
options awarded and the number of options previously granted. See the table
under "Option Grants -- Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year," above, for
information regarding options to purchase Common Stock granted to the Named
Executive Officers during fiscal 1998.
As described above, the grant of stock options to employees is a critical
element in the Company's pay-for-performance, variable compensation-based
philosophy that provides a competitive incentive to remain in the Company's
service. During the latter half of fiscal 1998, primarily due to the Asian
financial crisis described above, the stock market performance of the Common
Stock was highly volatile, as the U.S. financial markets reacted to the
disappointing performances announced by numerous companies, including the
Company. In March, 1998, the Committee reviewed the terms of stock option
grants to employees and determined that a large portion of such grants were of
little or no incentive value to the affected employees because the exercise
prices were well in excess of the then-current value of the Common Stock. The
Committee concluded that a significant and serious competitive disadvantage
would result to the Company if that situation were not remedied. To counteract
this competitive disadvantage, the Committee adopted an option exchange program
(the "Exchange Program"). The Named Executive Officers, all corporate officers,
certain corporate directors and non-employee directors were not eligible to
participate in the Exchange Program. Under the Exchange Program, eligible
employees were given the opportunity to exchange options with an exercise price
in excess of $25.00 per share for a stock option grant dated March 9, 1998 at
an exercise price of $21.50 per share, the fair market value of the Common
Stock on March 9, 1998. If an employee elected to exchange his or her options
under the Exchange Program, the vesting commencement date was extended by 90
days from the original vesting date. Options covering 534,522 shares of Common
Stock were exchanged under the Exchange Program.
Other Compensation and Employee Benefits Generally Available to Company
Employees. The Company maintains compensation and employee benefits that are
generally available to all Company employees, including medical, dental and
life insurance benefits, the Purchase Plan, a 401(k) retirement savings plan, a
supplemental retirement savings plan (an unfunded, non-qualified deferred
compensation plan maintained primarily for the purpose of providing deferral of
compensation for a select group of management employees as defined in ERISA
Sections 201, 301 and 401), and a cash bonus plan. The cash bonus plan awards
each eligible employee with up to two and one-half days of pay, based on base
salary, every quarter, if the Company meets certain operating profitability
objectives established by the Board of Directors. For fiscal 1998, each
eligible employee received 80% of the maximum cash bonus payment permitted
under the cash bonus plan.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
The Committee uses the same factors and criteria described above in making
compensation decisions regarding the Chief Executive Officer. For fiscal 1998,
Mr. Sanghi's base salary was increased by 6.67%. The Committee believes this is
an appropriate increase considering the base salaries of chief executive
officers in the Reference Group, and the Company's sales growth and performance
in an unprecedented
10
<PAGE>
and difficult industry environment. Mr. Sanghi's aggregate MICP bonus for
fiscal 1998 was determined after considering numerous objective and subjective
factors, including the Company's performance as compared to that of the
semiconductor industry as a whole, and resulted in a total MICP bonus payment
for fiscal 1998 (which was made as a contribution to the split-dollar life
insurance program) of approximately 59.6% of his base salary. As a result, Mr.
Sanghi's fiscal 1998 MICP bonus represented a percentage decrease of
approximately 24.0% in fiscal 1998 as compared to fiscal 1997 when Mr. Sanghi's
MICP bonus was approximately 78.4% of his base salary. See the "Summary
Compensation Table" and footnotes thereto, above. The Committee believes that
Mr. Sanghi's fiscal 1998 MICP bonus was (i) consistent with the Company's
pay-for-performance philosophy and is commensurate with the Company's overall
performance, as well as the fiscal 1998 AOP objectives; and (ii) reasonable
based on the Company's overall performance in fiscal 1998, its performance as
compared to the Reference Group and Mr. Sanghi's leadership and influence over
the Company's performance. On April 17, 1997, Mr. Sanghi was granted an option
to acquire 85,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $30.25 per
share. This grant becomes exercisable over a one-year vesting period in 12
successive monthly installments commencing July 1, 2001. The amount of the
grant and the vesting term was determined to provide an appropriate long-term
incentive for Mr. Sanghi. See the table under "Option Grants in Last Fiscal
Year," above.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), limits the deductibility by the Company for federal income tax
purposes of compensation paid to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and to
each of the Company's other four most highly compensated executive officers to
$1 million each, subject to certain exceptions. The Company anticipates that a
substantial portion of each executive officer's compensation will be "qualified
performance-based compensation," that is not limited under Code Section 162(m).
The Committee, therefore, does not currently anticipate that any executive
officer's compensation will exceed that limitation of deductibility in fiscal
1999. The Committee intends to review the deductibility of executive
compensation from time to time to determine whether any additional actions are
advisable to maintain deductibility.
By The Compensation and Stock Option Committees of the Board of Directors:
Albert J. Hugo-Martinez L.B. Day
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Board of Directors maintains a Compensation Committee, which is
currently comprised of Messrs. Hugo-Martinez and Day. Neither of Messrs.
Hugo-Martinez or Day had any contractual or other relationship or transaction
with the Company during fiscal 1998 except as a director and neither has ever
served as an officer or employee of the Company.
11
<PAGE>
Performance Graph
The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total stockholder
return for: (i) the Common Stock; (ii) a self-constructed Peer Group Index
comprised of six companies that operate in recognized market segments, such as
logic, memory and mixed-signal, within the semiconductor industry and that have
annual sales between $300 and $1.0 billion and a market capitalization of
between $400 million and $4.0 billion (the "Peer Group"); and (iii) the CRSP
Total Return Index for the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.). The Peer Group is
comprised of Altera Corporation, Atmel Corporation, Linear Technology
Corporation, Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Xilinx, Inc., and Zilog, Inc.
The Peer Group is identical to the Reference Group used by the Committee
in reviewing executive compensation. See "Board Compensation Committee Report
on Executive Compensation," above.
In preparing the following graph, it was assumed that $100 was invested in
the Common Stock at the initial offering price on March 22, 1993, the date on
which shares of Common Stock were first publicly traded. No cash dividends have
been declared or paid with respect to the Common Stock.
Note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative
of future stock performance.
FY 1998 Relative Stock Price Performance Data
Among Microchip Technology Inc., Peer Group Index and Broad Market Index
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
03/31/93 04/30/93 05/28/93 06/30/93 07/30/93 08/31/93 09/30/93 10/29/93
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Microchip Technology 100.00 131.77 144.18 181.38 176.73 288.35 322.46 396.87
Peer Group Index 100.00 98.36 115.21 118.07 123.69 139.01 152.44 139.12
Broad Market Index 100.00 95.73 103.51 103.99 104.11 109.49 112.75 115.29
<CAPTION>
11/30/93 12/31/93 01/31/94 02/28/94 03/31/94 04/29/94 05/31/94 06/30/94
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Microchip Technology 396.87 483.69 492.99 551.90 474.39 520.88 576.69 655.77
Peer Group Index 136.20 157.51 168.39 178.55 169.42 186.99 172.02 161.07
Broad Market Index 111.85 114.97 118.45 117.35 110.13 108.70 108.97 104.98
<CAPTION>
07/29/94 08/31/94 09/30/94 10/31/94 11/30/94 12/30/94 01/31/95 02/28/95
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Microchip Technology 595.30 683.68 730.17 863.33 830.18 767.39 624.38 704.61
Peer Group Index 152.62 178.53 186.83 209.38 202.86 211.37 203.61 232.96
Broad Market Index 107.13 113.96 113.67 115.91 112.06 112.38 113.01 118.98
<CAPTION>
03/31/95 04/30/95 05/31/95 06/30/95 07/29/95 08/31/95 09/29/95 10/31/95
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Microchip Technology 784.84 788.32 830.18 1015.05 1074.35 1060.40 1056.91 1107.50
Peer Group Index 244.22 276.10 292.26 333.84 399.93 429.94 443.85 433.86
Broad Market Index 122.51 126.37 129.63 140.13 150.43 153.47 157.01 156.11
<CAPTION>
11/30/95 12/29/95 01/31/96 02/29/96 03/29/96 04/30/96 05/31/96 06/28/96
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Microchip Technology 1130.16 1018.54 927.85 774.37 767.39 711.58 718.56 690.65
Peer Group Index 401.82 360.53 416.85 417.78 367.43 397.70 377.16 315.51
Broad Market Index 159.77 158.94 159.76 165.89 166.35 180.15 188.43 179.93
<CAPTION>
07/31/96 08/30/96 09/30/96 10/31/96 11/29/96 12/31/96 01/31/97 02/28/97
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Microchip Technology 889.48 1023.79 1042.96 1011.57 1332.48 1419.68 1595.83 1564.44
Peer Group Index 320.33 337.39 366.40 358.34 469.72 440.45 541.09 505.02
Broad Market Index 163.91 173.09 186.34 184.30 195.72 195.50 209.36 194.01
<CAPTION>
03/31/97 04/30/97 05/30/97 06/30/97 07/31/97 08/29/97 09/30/97 10/31/97
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Microchip Technology 1255.74 1308.06 1485.95 1245.27 1559.21 1692.63 1890.13 1669.08
Peer Group Index 470.58 510.86 541.36 531.52 627.32 609.23 623.18 522.76
Broad Market Index 181.12 186.53 207.60 214.04 236.37 235.77 250.54 237.03
<CAPTION>
11/28/97 12/31/97 01/30/98 02/27/98 03/31/98
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Microchip Technology 1465.03 1255.74 966.67 1012.46 879.02
Peer Group Index 531.40 473.40 497.21 576.69 516.32
Broad Market Index 237.52 233.53 240.67 263.61 273.68
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE>
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS,
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of the Common Stock, as of April 26, 1998 by: (i) each
director and nominee for director; (ii) each of the Named Executive Officers;
(iii) all directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) each person who
is known to the Company to own beneficially more than five percent of the
Common Stock:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Shares Percent of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Beneficially Owned(1)(2) Common Stock
------------------------------------ ------------------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Fidelity Management & Research (3) ......... 6,520,550 12.32%
Capital Group Companies (4) ................ 6,306,520 11.91%
AMVESCAP PLC. (5) .......................... 4,358,875 8.23%
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (6) ......... 3,957,425 7.48%
J. & W. Seligman & Co., Inc. (7) ........... 3,490,100 6.59%
The Kaufman Fund, Inc. (8) ................. 3,346,700 6.32%
Pilgrim Baxter & Associates (9) ............ 3,021,208 5.71%
Steve Sanghi (10) .......................... 1,297,426 2.42%
George P. Rigg (11) ........................ 141,451 *
Robert A. Lanford .......................... 79,536 *
C. Philip Chapman (12) ..................... 53,393 *
Timothy B. Billington (13) ................. 41,060 *
Albert J. Hugo-Martinez (14) ............... 40,973 *
L.B. Day (15) .............................. 28,583 *
Matthew W. Chapman (16) .................... 12,194 *
Jon H. Beedle (17) ......................... 12,083 *
Mitchell R. Little (18) .................... 11,720 *
All directors and executive officers as a
group (ten persons) (19) .................. 1,718,419 3.19%
</TABLE>
- ------------
* Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock
(1) Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant
to applicable community property laws, the persons named in this table
have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common
Stock.
(2) Includes shares of Common Stock issuable to the identified person pursuant
to stock options and stock purchase rights that may be exercised within 60
days of April 26, 1998. In calculating the percentage of ownership, such
shares are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage of shares of Common Stock owned by such person but are not
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of
shares of Common Stock owned by any other stockholder.
(3) One Federal Street, Boston, MA 02109. Information is based on a Schedule
13G filed with the SEC by Fidelity Management and Research dated April 10,
1998. Such Schedule 13G indicates that various persons have the right to
receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the
proceeds from the sale of Common Stock, but that no one person's interest
in the Common Stock is more than five percent of the outstanding Common
Stock.
(4) 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071. Information is based on a
Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by The Capital Group Companies, Inc. dated
May 8, 1998. The Capital Group Companies, Inc. is the parent holding
company of a group of investment management companies that hold investment
power and, in some cases, voting power over the securities reported in the
referenced Schedule 13G. The investment management companies, which
include a "bank" as defined in Section 3(a)6 of the Exchange Act and
several investment advisers registered under Section 203 of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940, provide investment advisory and management services
for their respective clients which include registered investment companies
and institutional accounts. The Capital Group Companies, Inc. does not
have investment power or voting power over any of the securities reported
in such Schedule 13G; however, the Capital Group Companies, Inc. may be
deemed to "beneficially own" such securities by virtue of Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act.
13
<PAGE>
Capital Research and Management Company, an investment adviser registered
under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and wholly owned
subsidiary of The Capital Group Companies, Inc., is the beneficial owner of
5,727,100 shares of Common Stock as a result of acting as investment
adviser to various investment companies registered under Section 8 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940. The Growth Fund of America, Inc., an
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940,
which is advised by Capital Research and Management Company, is the
beneficial owner of 2,675,000 shares of Common Stock. The remaining shares
reported as being beneficially owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc.
are beneficially owned by other subsidiaries of The Capital Group
Companies, Inc., none of which by itself owns five percent or more of the
outstanding securities.
(5) 11 Devenshire Squire, London, EC2M 4YR, England. Information is based on a
Schedule 13G filed with the SEC dated February 9, 1998. Such Schedule 13G
indicates that AMVESCAP PLC has shared power to vote or direct the vote
and to dispose of and direct the disposition of such Common Stock.
(6) 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. Information is based on a
Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. dated
February 12, 1998. Such Schedule 13G indicates that T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc. has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and to
dispose of and direct the disposition of such Common Stock.
(7) 100 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017. Information is based on a Schedule
13G filed with the SEC by J. & W. Seligman & Co., Inc. dated February 13,
1998. Such Schedule 13G indicates that J & W. Seligman & Co., Inc. has the
shared power to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of and direct the
disposition of such Common Stock.
(8) 140 East 45th Street, 43rd Floor, New York, NY 10017. Information is based
on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by The Kaufman Fund, Inc. dated
December 31, 1997. Such Schedule 13G indicates that The Kaufman Fund, Inc.
has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of and direct
the disposition of such Common Stock.
(9) 825 Duportail Road, Wayne, PA 19087. Information is based on a Schedule
13G filed with the SEC by Pilgrim Baxter & Associates. dated January 20,
1998. Such Schedule 13G indicates that Pilgrim Baxter & Associates has the
shared power to vote or direct the vote of 3,021,208 shares of Common
Stock and the sole power to dispose of and direct the disposition of such
Common Stock.
(10) Includes 626,875 shares issuable upon exercise of options. Also includes
312,369 shares held of record by Steve Sanghi and Maria Sanghi as joint
tenants, 296,666 held individually by Steve Sanghi, and 61,646 shares held
of record by Steve Sanghi and Maria T. Sanghi as Trustees of Declaration
of Trust.
(11) Includes 39,513 shares issuable upon exercise of options.
(12) Includes 51,010 shares issuable upon exercise of options.
(13) Includes 40,059 shares issuable upon exercise of options.
(14) Includes 40,973 shares issuable upon exercise of options.
(15) Includes 28,583 shares issuable upon exercise of options.
(16) Includes 8,194 shares issuable upon exercise of options.
(17) Includes 12,083 shares issuable upon exercise of options. Mr. Beedle has
decided not to stand for re-election to the Board of Directors. See
"Election of Directors," above.
(18) Includes 11,720 shares issuable upon exercise of options.
(19) Includes 859,010 shares issuable upon exercise of options.
14
<PAGE>
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors and
executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a class of the
Company's equity securities registered under the Exchange Act to file reports
of securities ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers,
directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to
furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on the Company's review of the copies of such forms received
by it during the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998, and written representations
that no other reports were required, the Company believes that each person who,
at any time during fiscal 1998, was a director, officer or beneficial owner of
more than 10% of the Common Stock, complied with all Section 16(a) filing
requirements.
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors has appointed KPMG Peat Marwick LLP ("KPMG"),
independent certified public accountants, to audit the consolidated financial
statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1999. KPMG has
audited the Company's financial statements since fiscal 1993. The Board of
Directors recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the ratification of
such appointment. In the event of a negative vote on such ratification, the
Board of Directors will reconsider its selection. The Board of Directors
anticipates that representatives of KPMG will be present at the Meeting, will
have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire, and will be available
to respond to appropriate questions.
DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDERS PROPOSALS
Pursuant to Rule 14a-5(e) of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange
Act, stockholder proposals that are intended to be presented by such
stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company for the
fiscal year ending March 31, 1999 must be received by the Company no later than
March 8, 1999 in order to be considered for possible inclusion in the proxy
statement and form of proxy relating to such meeting.
OTHER MATTERS
The Company knows of no other matters to be submitted to the Meeting. If
any other matters properly come before the Meeting, it is the intention of the
persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote the shares they represent as the
Board of Directors may recommend.
For business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a
stockholder, the Company's By-Laws require that the Company's secretary must
have received notice in writing from the stockholder not less than 30 days nor
more than 60 days prior to the meeting; provided, however, that if less than 35
days' notice of the meeting is given to stockholders, such notice must be
received by the secretary not later than the close of business on the seventh
day following the day on which the notice of meeting was mailed. The written
notice to the secretary shall set forth, as to each matter the stockholder
proposes to bring before the annual meeting: (i) a brief description of the
business, (ii) the name and address, as they appear on the Company's books, of
the stockholder proposing such business, (iii) the number of shares of Common
Stock beneficially owned by such stockholder, and (iv) any material interest of
such stockholder in such business.
Dated: July 6, 1998
15
<PAGE>
PROXY PROXY
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
This Proxy is Solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
1998 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The undersigned stockholder of MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice
of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement of the Company, each dated
July 6, 1998 and hereby appoints Steve Sanghi and C. Philip Chapman, and each of
them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on
behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the
1998 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, to be held on August 10,
1998, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Company's facility at 1200 South 52nd
Street, Tempe, Arizona, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, and to
vote all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote
if then and there personally present, in the matters set forth below:
A majority of such attorneys or substitutes as shall be present and
shall act at said meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof (or if only
one shall be present and act, then that one) shall have and may exercise all of
the powers of said attorneys-in-fact hereunder.
(Continued and to be signed on reverse side.)
<PAGE>
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
PLEASE MARK VOTE IN CIRCLE IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER USING DARK INK ONLY. 0
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
[ ]
<S> <C>
1. Election of Directors: For Withhold For All 2. Proposal to ratify the appointment For Against Abstain
Nominees: Steve Sanghi; All All Except of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as the 0 0 0
Albert J. Hugo-Martinez; 0 0 0 independent auditors of the Company
L. B. Day;
Matthew W. Chapman
_____________________________________
(Except nominee(s) written above
This Proxy will be voted as directed or, if no contrary direction is
indicated, will be voted for the Election of Directors; for the
ratification of the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as the
independent auditors of the Company; and as said proxies deem advisable
on such other matters as may come before the meeting.
Dated:_________________________, 1998
Signature(s)___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
(This Proxy should be dated, signed by the stockholder(s) exactly as
his or her name appears hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed
envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should so indicate.
If shares are held by joint tenants or as community property, both
stockholders should sign.)
</TABLE>
^ FOLD AND DETACH HERE ^
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY
USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
