<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
-----------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
Commission File No. 0-17809
-------------------------------------------------------------
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3; A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts 04-3005973
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
225 Franklin Street, 25th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(617) 261-9000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Units of Limited Partnership Interest
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
No voting stock is held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
-----------------------------------
None
Page 1 of ____ pages (including exhibits). Exhibit Index on Page ____.
<PAGE>
PART I
------
Item 1. Business.
--------
Copley Realty Income Partners 3; A Limited Partnership (the
"Partnership") was organized under the Uniform Limited Partnership Act of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts on February 17, 1988, to invest primarily in newly
constructed and existing income-producing real properties.
The Partnership was initially capitalized with contributions of
$2,000 in the aggregate from Third Income Corp. (the "Managing General Partner")
and GCOP Associates Limited Partnership (the "Associate General Partner")
(collectively, the "General Partners") and $10,000 from Copley Real Estate
Advisors, Inc. (the "Initial Limited Partner"). The Partnership filed a
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (the "Registration Statement") with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 1988, with respect to a
public offering of 40,000 units of limited partnership interest at a price of
$1,000 per unit (the "Units") with an option to sell up to an additional 60,000
Units (an aggregate of $100,000,000). The Registration Statement was declared
effective on May 23, 1988.
The first sale of Units occurred on October 13, 1988, at which
time the Initial Limited Partner withdrew its contribution from the Partnership.
Investors were admitted to the Partnership thereafter at monthly closings; the
offering terminated and the last group of initial investors was admitted to the
Partnership on June 6, 1989. As of June 6, 1989, a total of 27,641 Units had
been sold, a total of 1,703 investors had been admitted as limited partners (the
"Limited Partners") and a total of $27,140,580 had been contributed to the
capital of the Partnership. The remaining 72,359 Units were de-registered on
June 27, 1989.
As of December 31, 1996, the Partnership is invested in the three
real property investments described below. The Partnership has no current plan
to renovate, improve or further develop any of its real property. In the opinion
of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, the properties are
adequately covered by insurance.
The Partnership has no employees. Services are performed for the
Partnership by the Managing General Partner and affiliates of the Managing
General Partner.
A. Research and Development Building in San Jose, California
---------------------------------------------------------
("South Bay Associates").
- ------------------------
On May 18, 1989, the Partnership acquired a 65% interest in a
joint venture formed with an affiliate of South Bay Construction and Development
Co., Inc. As of December 31, 1995, the Partnership had contributed $2,528,247 to
the capital of the joint venture, pursuant to a maximum commitment of
$2,250,000. As a result of the overfunding, the Partnership's ownership interest
in the venture was increased to 71.1%. The joint venture agreement entitled the
Partnership to receive a monthly preferred return on its capital contribution at
the rate of 10.5% per annum. The joint venture agreement also entitled the
Partnership to receive 71.1% of remaining cash flow and 71.1% of sale and
refinancing proceeds following the return of the partnership's equity. The
Partnership also committed to make a mortgage loan to the joint venture in the
maximum amount of $4,500,000, all of which was funded. The loan had a term of
seven years and was secured by a first mortgage on the property described below.
Interest only was payable monthly at the rate of 10% per annum; however,
interest on the mortgage loan was not kept current. Effective January 1, 1996,
the joint venture was restructured and ownership of the joint venture assets was
assigned to the Partnership.
The Partnership owns approximately 6.7 acres of land, improved
with an approximately 90,000 square foot research and development building in
San Jose, California. In 1994, the former tenant of the building paid a
termination fee and the building was released in its entirety to a new tenant
for a term expiring in September 2001. The Partnership funded all of the costs
associated with this transaction. During the first lease year, the tenant was
only required to pay rent on 83% of the building. The tenant
<PAGE>
began paying rent on 100% of the space effective May 1995. As of December 31,
1996, the building is 100% leased.
B. Industrial Building in Brea, California ("Brea West")
-----------------------------------------------------
On April 28, 1989, the Partnership acquired a 60% interest in
a joint venture formed with an affiliate of The Muller Company. The Partnership
committed to contribute $8,250,000 to the capital of the joint venture, all of
which was funded. On December 20, 1990, the Partnership increased its investment
in the joint venture by committing to make a deficit loan to the venture in the
maximum amount of $900,000, of which $828,799 was funded. Because the
Partnership's joint venture partner was unable to fund its share of deficits,
the Partnership assumed 100% ownership of the joint venture's assets, effective
June 30, 1991. The property consists primarily of approximately 7.51 acres of
land in Brea, California and an approximately 184,000 square foot industrial
facility located thereon. As of December 31, 1996, the facility was 100% leased
to one tenant until September 2000.
C. Industrial Building in Simi Valley, California ("Shasta Way")
-------------------------------------------------------------
On September 29, 1989, the Partnership acquired a 34.8%
interest in a joint venture formed with Copley Realty Income Partners 4; A
Limited Partnership, an affiliate of the Partnership (the "Affiliate") with a
25.2% interest, and an affiliate of The Hewson Company (the "Developer"). As of
December 31, 1996, the Partnership had contributed $7,111,757 to the capital of
the joint venture out of a maximum commitment of $7,612,500. Effective January
1, 1996, the joint venture was restructured whereby the Developer withdrew, and
the ownership interests of the Partnership and its Affiliate increased to 58%
and 42%, respectively. The joint venture agreement entitled the Partnership and
the Affiliate to receive a preferred return on their respective invested capital
at the rate of 10% per annum. The joint venture agreement also entitles the
Partnership to receive 58% of remaining cash flow and 58% of sale and
refinancing proceeds following the return of the Partnership's and the
Affiliate's equity.
The joint venture owns approximately 12.13 acres of land in
Simi Valley, California and in June 1991 completed construction thereon of an
approximately 235,080 square foot industrial building. As of December 31, 1996,
the facility was 100% leased to one tenant until December 1998. The lease
includes two five-year renewal options.
<PAGE>
Item 2. Properties.
----------
The following table sets forth the annual realty taxes for the
Partnership's properties and information regarding tenants who occupy 10% or
more of gross leasable area (GLA) in the Partnership's properties:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
1997 Annual
Property Annual Number of Contract
Realty Tenants with 10% Name(s) of Square Feet of Rent Lease
Taxes or More of GLA Tenant(s) Each Tenant Per S. F. Expiration
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R&D Building in San Jose, CA $72,401 1 Media Arts Group 90,000 $5.10 9/2001
Industrial Building in Brea, CA $83,356 1 Nature's Best 184,000 $5.24 9/2000
Industrial Building in Simi $74,316 1 Bugle Boy 235,080 $4.87 12/1998
Valley, CA Industries
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
Renewal Line of Business
Options of Principal Tenants
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
R&D Building in San Jose, CA One 2-year option Artwork Distributor
Industrial Building in Brea, CA None Health Food Distributor
Industrial Building in Simi Two 5-year Apparel Manufacturer
Valley, CA options
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth for each of the last five years the
gross leasable areas, occupancy rates, rental revenue and net effective rent for
the Partnership's properties:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net
Rental Effective
Gross-Leasable Year-End Revenue Rent
Property Area Occupancy Recognized ($/sf/yr)*
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R&D Building in San Jose, CA
- ----------------------------
1992 90,000 100% $674,436 $7.49
1993 90,000 100% $742,100 $8.25
1994 90,000 83% $555,526 $6.96
1995 90,000 100% $532,939 $6.28
1996 90,000 100% $534,178 $5.94
Industrial Building in Brea, CA
- -------------------------------
1992 184,000 100% $950,352 $5.16
1993 184,000 100% $977,076 $5.31
1994 184,000 100% $995,209 $5.41
1995 184,000 100% $1,001,985 $5.45
1996 184,000 100% $1,023,187 $5.56
Industrial Building in Simi Valley, CA
- --------------------------------------
1992 235,080 0% $0 $0.00
1993 235,080 80% $863,430 $6.12
1994 235,080 100% $1,157,494 $5.28
1995 235,080 100% $1,163,851 $4.95
1996 235,080 100% $1,208,205 $5.14
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
* Net Effective Rent calculation is based on average occupancy during the
respective year.
<PAGE>
Set forth below is a schedule of lease expirations for each of the
next ten years for the Partnership's properties based on the annual contract
rent in effect at December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TENANT AGING REPORT
Property # of Lease Total Total Percentage of
Expirations Square Feet Annual Gross Annual
Contract Rent* Rental
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R&D Building in San Jose, CA
- ----------------------------
1997 0 0 $0 0%
1998 0 0 $0 0%
1999 0 0 $0 0%
2000 0 0 $0 0%
2001 1 90,000 $459,000 100%
2002 0 0 $0 0%
2003 0 0 $0 0%
2004 0 0 $0 0%
2005 0 0 $0 0%
2006 0 0 $0 0%
Industrial Building in Brea, CA
- -------------------------------
1997 0 0 $0 0%
1998 0 0 $0 0%
1999 0 0 $0 0%
2000 1 184,000 $963,700 100%
2001 0 0 $0 0%
2002 0 0 $0 0%
2003 0 0 $0 0%
2004 0 0 $0 0%
2005 0 0 $0 0%
2006 0 0 $0 0%
Industrial Building in Simi Valley, CA
- --------------------------------------
1997 0 0 $0 0%
1998 1 235,080 $1,144,191 100%
1999 0 0 $0 0%
2000 0 0 $0 0%
2001 0 0 $0 0%
2002 0 0 $0 0%
2003 0 0 $0 0%
2004 0 0 $0 0%
2005 0 0 $0 0%
2006 0 0 $0 0%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
* Does not include expenses paid by tenants.
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth for each of the Partnership's
properties the: (i) federal tax basis, (ii) rate of depreciation, (iii) method
of depreciation, (iv) life claimed, and (v) accumulated depreciation, with
respect to each property or component thereof for purposes of depreciation:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depreciable Assets
Rate of Life Accumulated
Entity / Property Tax Basis Depreciation Method in years Depreciation
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
South Bay Associates
- ----------------------------------------------
Building & Building Improvements $3,710,736 2.50% SL 40 $647,657
----------- ----- --------
Total Depreciable Assets 3,710,736 647,657
Brea West
- ----------------------------------------------
Building & Improvements 5,673,186 3.17% SL 31.5 1,094,814
Land Improvements 70,337 6.67% SL 15 24,466
------- ----- ------
Total Depreciable Assets 5,743,523 1,119,280
Shasta Way
- ----------------------------------------------
Building & Improvements 6,643,803 3.17% SL 31.5 1,076,551
---------- ----- ---------
Total Depreciable Assets 6,643,803 1,076,551
Total Depreciable Assets $16,098,062 $2,843,488
============ ==========
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
SL = Straight-Line
<PAGE>
Following is information regarding the competitive market
conditions for each of the Partnership's properties. This information has been
gathered from sources deemed reliable. However, the Partnership has not
independently verified the information and, as such, cannot guarantee its
accuracy or completeness:
A. Industrial Building in Simi Valley, CA.
---------------------------------------
This property is located within the greater Los Angeles
industrial market, consisting of 957 million square feet. More specifically, the
property is located within the San Fernando Valley industrial market, which
consists of 72 million square feet, or 8% of the total greater Los Angeles
industrial market. As of September 30, 1996, the San Fernando Valley industrial
vacancy rate was approximately 7.3%, reflecting a small improvement from the
vacancy rate reported as of September 30, 1995, but representing a significant
improvement from the 20% vacancy rate reported as of December 31, 1993. Similar
to other areas of southern California, some speculative construction occurred in
1996, although most of the construction related to build-to-suit contracts. Low
vacancy and limited speculative construction have resulted in the stabilization
of rental rates. Rental rates on quality buildings are increasing.
B. R&D Building in San Jose, CA.
-----------------------------
This property is located within the city of San Jose and is
part of the light industrial/ R & D market of the Silicon Valley in Santa Clara
County. At September 30, 1996, the Silicon Valley R & D market had an overall
estimated inventory of 112 million square feet, with a vacancy rate of 4.4%,
down from 8.8% reported one year ago. San Jose is the largest submarket within
Silicon Valley with a total inventory of approximately 30 million square feet,
or 27% of the total Silicon Valley market. Vacancy in San Jose was 3.8% at
September 30, 1996, down from 9.6% a year earlier. New construction in Silicon
Valley over the last year has totaled approximately 3.7 million square feet,
670,000 of which was on a speculative basis. New construction in San Jose
accounted for 890,000 square feet or approximately 25% of Silicon Valley's
total.
C. Industrial Building in Brea, CA.
--------------------------------
This property is located with the Orange County industrial
market, consisting of 228 million square feet. Brea is a desirable industrial
location due to its close proximity to Los Angeles County and the central
portion of Orange County. At September 30, 1996, overall vacancy was 7.8%, down
from 9.3% twelve months earlier. The property more specifically is located
within the North Orange County industrial submarket, which has an inventory of
101 million square feet, or 44% of the total Orange County market. As of
September 30, 1996, the North Orange County vacancy rate was 6.6%, down from the
8.1% vacancy rate reported one year ago and 11% two years ago. Approximately 3.7
million square feet of new industrial space was either under construction or had
been completed as of September 30, 1996.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
-----------------
The Partnership is not a party to, nor are any of its properties
subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
---------------------------------------------------
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
<PAGE>
PART II
-------
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
-------------------------------------------------------------
Matters.
-------
There is no active market for the Units. Trading in the Units is
sporadic and occurs solely through private transactions.
As of December 31, 1996, there were 1,748 holders of Units.
The Partnership's Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership dated October 13, 1988, as amended to date (the "Partnership
Agreement"), requires that any Distributable Cash (as defined therein) be
distributed quarterly to the Partners in specified proportions and priorities.
There are no restrictions on the Partnership's present or future ability to make
distributions of Distributable Cash. For the year ended December 31, 1996, cash
distributions paid in 1996, or distributed after year end with respect to 1996
to the Limited Partners as a group totaled $1,658,460. For the year ended 1995,
cash distributions paid in 1995, or distributed after year end with respect to
1995 to the Limited Partners as a group totaled $1,589,358.
Cash distributions exceeded net income in 1996 and 1995 and,
therefore, resulted in a reduction of partners' capital. Distributions, however,
were less than cash provided by operating activities in both years. Reference is
made to the Partnership's Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital (Deficit)
and Statement of Cash Flows in Item 8 hereof.
<PAGE>
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
-----------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For Year For Year For Year For Year For Year
Ended or Ended or Ended or Ended or Ended or
As of: As of: As of: As of: As of:
12/31/96 12/31/95 12/31/94(1) 12/31/93 12/31/92
-------- -------- ----------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 1,993,178 $ 1,749,606 $ 1,650,992 $1,411,498 $1,580,815
Net Income (Loss) $ 1,058,287 $ 1,025,324 $(1,451,876) $ 681,269 $828,898
Net Income (Loss)
per Limited
Partnership Unit $ 37.90 $ 36.72 $ (52.00) $ 24.40 $ 29.69
Total Assets $ 19,622,775 $ 20,250,786 $20,750,350 $23,600,717 $ 24,317,981
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
Total Cash
Distributions
per Limited
Partnership Unit,
including amounts
distributed after
year end with
respect to the
previous year $ 60.00 $ 57.50 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------
</TABLE>
(1) Net Income (Loss) in 1994 includes a charge of $2,400,000 related to
impairment of the carrying value of an investment.
<PAGE>
Item 7.
- -------
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operations
- ----------
Liquidity and Capital Resources
- -------------------------------
The Partnership completed its offering of units of limited partnership
interest in June 1989 and a total of 27,641 units were sold. The Partnership
received proceeds of $24,458,317, net of selling commissions and other offering
costs, which have been used for investment in real estate and to pay related
acquisition costs or are being retained as working capital reserves. The
Partnership made the real estate investments described in Item 1 hereof.
At December 31, 1996, the Partnership had $2,301,896 in cash, cash
equivalents, and short-term investments, of which $418,803 was used for cash
distributions to partners on January 30, 1997; the remainder is being retained
for working capital reserves. The source of future liquidity and cash
distributions to partners will be cash generated by the Partnership's real
estate and short-term investments. Distributions of cash from operations
relating to all four quarters of 1996 were made at the annualized rate of 6.0%
on a capital contribution of $1,000 per unit. The annualized distribution rate
for the first quarter of 1995 was 5.0%. The increase in the distribution rate to
6.0% in the second quarter of 1995 was the result of increased cash flow from
the lease-up of the South Bay property in May 1995.
The carrying value of real estate investments in the financial
statements at December 31, 1996 is at depreciated cost, or if the investment's
carrying value is determined not to be recoverable through expected undiscounted
future cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to estimated fair market value.
The fair market value of such investments is further reduced by the estimated
costs of sale for properties held for sale. Carrying value may be greater or
less than current appraised value. At December 31, 1996, the aggregate appraised
value of the Partnership's investments was approximately $1,700,000 greater than
their aggregate carrying value. The current appraised value of real estate
investments has been estimated by the Managing General Partner and is generally
based on a combination of traditional appraisal approaches performed by the
Partnership's advisor and independent appraisers. Because of the subjectivity
inherent in the valuation process, the current appraised value may differ
significantly from that which could be realized if the real estate were actually
offered for sale in the marketplace.
Results of Operations
Form of Real Estate Investments
The Brea West investment is a wholly-owned property. The South Bay
investment was structured as a joint venture with a real estate
management/development firm. Effective January 1, 1996, however, the venture was
restructured and the venture partner's ownership interest was assigned to the
Partnership. Accordingly, as of that date, this investment has been accounted
for as a wholly-owned property. The Shasta Way investment had been structured as
a joint venture with a real estate management/development firm and an affiliate
of the Partnership. As of January 1, 1996, the ownership was restructured, and
the management/development firm's interest was assigned to the Partnership and
its affiliate in proportion to their respective ownership interests. The
Partnership's ownership percentage increased to 58%.
<PAGE>
Operating Factors
The Brea West property was 100% leased to a single tenant at December
31, 1996, 1995 and 1994. Base rent increased in October 1995, in accordance with
the terms of the lease agreement.
The South Bay property is 100% leased to a single tenant. The lease
term began in May, 1994 for 83% of the building for the first year, and 100% of
the building thereafter through September, 2001. During 1994, the Managing
General Partner determined that the Partnership will likely not recover the
carrying value of this investment over the projected holding period.
Accordingly, the carrying value was reduced to estimated net realizable value,
with a charge to operations of $2,400,000.
The Shasta Way venture completed the construction of its industrial
facility in 1991. A lease was executed for 80% of the building commencing April
1, 1993, and as of May 1, 1994, the tenant leased the entire building through
December 31, 1998.
Three tenants each contributed more than 10% of the rental revenue from
the Partnership's investments (collectively 100%) for 1996. These tenants were
current with regard to lease payments at December 31, 1996; management is not
aware of any impairment in the tenants' ability to continue to perform in
accordance with the terms of their respective leases.
Investment Results
1996 Compared to 1995
Aggregate operating results from real estate investments were
$1,222,744 and $1,176,705 in 1996 and 1995, respectively. Operating income
increased at each of the three properties. Brea West increased by $10,000, as an
increase in rental income was partially offset by increased operating expenses.
South Bay increased by $18,000 due to a decrease in operating expenses. At
Shasta Way, operating income increased by $16,000, primarily due to a rental
increase in October 1995, partially offset by higher operating expenses.
Interest on cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased by
$12,000 or 10%, primarily due to a decrease in short-term yields, partially
offset by higher average invested balances.
Cash flow provided by operations increased by approximately $171,000
primarily due to improved investment results and the timing of cash
distributions from Shasta Way and South Bay, together with changes in property
working capital.
1995 Compared to 1994
Exclusive of the valuation allowance at South Bay in 1994, aggregate
operating results from real estate investments were $1,176,705 and $1,105,417 in
1995 and 1994, respectively. The increase primarily resulted from Shasta Way,
where operating income increased by $78,000 largely due to the cost of
earthquake repairs incurred in 1994. At Brea West, operating income increased by
$8,000 due the rental increase in October 1995. Income from operations at South
Bay decreased by $15,000 since 1994 revenue included a lease termination fee and
expense reimbursements totaling approximately $176,000 related to the settlement
with a former tenant, although operating expenses in 1994 included approximately
$90,000 related to roof repairs.
Interest on cash equivalents and short-term investments increased by
$28,000 or 31%, due primarily to higher short-term yields.
<PAGE>
Cash flow from operations increased by approximately $227,000 between
1995 and 1994. The increase is primarily due to the improved investment results
and the timing of distributions from South Bay.
Portfolio Expenses
General and administrative expenses primarily consist of real estate
legal, appraisal, printing, accounting, legal and servicing agent fees. These
expenses decreased $6,000 or 5% between 1995 and 1996 primarily due to decreases
in legal and professional fees. General and administrative expenses were
virtually unchanged between 1994 and 1995, as an increase in professional fees
was offset by a decrease in printing costs. The Partnership management fee is 9%
of distributable cash flow from operations after any increase or decrease in
working capital reserves, as determined by the Managing General Partner.
Management fees increased in 1995 and 1996 due to the increases in distributable
cash flow.
Inflation
- ---------
By their nature, real estate investments tend not be adversely affected
by inflation. Inflation may result in appreciation in the value of the
Partnership's real estate investments over time, if rental rates and replacement
costs increase. Declines in real property values during the period of
Partnership operations, due to market and economic conditions, have overshadowed
the positive effect inflation may have on the value of the Partnership's
investments.
<PAGE>
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
-------------------------------------------
See the Financial Statements of the Partnership included as a part
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Disagreements on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
----------------------------------------------------
The Partnership has had no disagreements with its accountants on
any matters of accounting principles or practices or financial statement
disclosure.
PART III
--------
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
--------------------------------------------------
(a) and (b) Identification of Directors and Executive Officers.
The following table sets forth the names of the directors and
executive officers of the Managing General Partner and the age and position held
by each of them as of December 31, 1996, as well as subsequent changes through
January 24, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Position(s) with the Managing General Partner Age
<S> <C> <C>
Joseph W. O'Connor President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 50
Daniel J. Coughlin Managing Director and Director 44
Peter P. Twining (1) Managing Director, General Counsel and Director 50
Wesley M. Gardiner, Jr. Vice President 38
Daniel C. Mackowiak Principal Financial and Accounting Officer 45
James J. Finnegan (2) Managing Director, General Counsel and Director 36
</TABLE>
(1) Through January 24, 1997 only
(2) As of January 25, 1997
Mr. O'Connor and Mr. Coughlin have served in an executive capacity
since the organization of the Managing General Partner on February 17, 1988. Mr.
Gardiner and Mr. Twining have served in their capacities since June 1994, and
Mr. Mackowiak has served in his capacity since January 1, 1996. All of these
individuals will continue to serve in such capacities until their successors are
elected and qualify.
(c) Identification of Certain Significant Employees.
None.
(d) Family Relationships.
None.
(e) Business Experience.
The Managing General Partner was incorporated in Massachusetts
on February 17, 1988. The background and experience of the executive officers
and directors of the Managing General Partner are as follows:
Joseph W. O'Connor has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a
Director of AEW Real Estate Advisors, Inc. ("AEW"), formerly Copley Real Estate
Advisors, since January, 1982. He was a
<PAGE>
Principal of AEW from 1985 to 1987 and has been a Managing Director of AEW since
January 1, 1988. He has been active in real estate for 28 years. From June,
1967, until December, 1981, he was employed by New England Mutual Life Insurance
Company ("The New England"), which has been merged with and into Metropolitan
Life Insurance Company, most recently as a Vice President in which position he
was responsible for The New England's real estate portfolio. He received a B.A.
from Holy Cross College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Daniel J. Coughlin was a Principal of AEW from 1985 to 1987 and has
been a Managing Director of AEW since January 1, 1988 and a Director of AEW
since July 1994. Mr. Coughlin has been active in financial management and
control for 22 years. From June, 1974 to December, 1981, he was Real Estate
Administration Officer in the Investment Real Estate Department at The New
England. Since January, 1982, he has been in charge of the asset management
division of AEW. Mr. Coughlin is a Certified Property Manager and a licensed
real estate broker. He received a B.A. from Stonehill College and an M.B.A. from
Boston University.
Peter P. Twining was a Managing Director and General Counsel of AEW
until January 24, 1997 when he resigned from all offices and directorships. As
such, he was responsible for general legal oversight and policy with respect to
AEW and its investment portfolios. Before being promoted to this position in
January 1994, he was a Vice President/Principal and senior lawyer responsible
for assisting in the oversight and management of AEW's legal operations. Before
joining AEW in 1987, he was a senior member of the Law Department at The New
England and was associated with the Boston law firm, Ropes and Gray. Mr. Twining
is a graduate of Harvard College and received his J.D. in 1979 from Northeastern
University.
Wesley M. Gardiner, Jr. joined AEW in 1990 and has been a Vice
President at AEW since January, 1994. From 1982 to 1990, he was employed by
Metric Realty, a nationally-known real estate investment advisor and syndication
firm, as a portfolio manager responsible for several public and private limited
partnerships. His career at AEW has included asset management responsibility for
the company's Georgia and Texas holdings. Presently, as a Vice President and
Team Leader, Mr. Gardiner has overall responsibility for all the partnerships
advised by AEW whose securities are registered under the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934. He received a B.A. in Economics from the University of California
at San Diego.
Daniel C. Mackowiak has been a Vice President of AEW since January 1989
and has been a Vice President and the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
of the Managing General Partner since January 1996. Mr. Mackowiak previously
held the offices of Chief Accounting Officer of AEW from January 1989 through
April 1994 and Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of
the Managing General Partner between January 1989 and May 1994. From 1975 until
joining AEW, he was employed by the public accounting firm of Price Waterhouse,
most recently as a Senior Audit Manager. He is a certified public accountant and
has been active in the field of accounting his entire business career. He
received a B.S. from Nichols College and an M.B.A. from Cornell University.
James J. Finnegan is the Assistant General Counsel of AEW Capital
Management, L.P. ("AEW Capital Management") and has succeeded Peter Twining as
Managing Director, General Counsel and Director of AEW, a subsidiary of AEW
Capital Management. Mr. Finnegan served as Vice President and Assistant General
Counsel of Aldrich, Eastman & Waltch, L.P., a predecessor to AEW Capital
Management. Mr. Finnegan has over ten years of experience in real estate law,
including seven years of experience in private practice with major New York City
and Boston law firms. Mr. Finnegan also serves as the firm's securities and
regulatory compliance officer. Mr. Finnegan is a graduate of the University of
Vermont (B.A.) and Fordham University School of Law (J.D.).
<PAGE>
Mr. O'Connor is a director of Evans Withycombe Residential, Inc., a
Maryland corporation organized as a real estate investment trust which is listed
for trading on the New York Stock Exchange. None of the other directors of the
Managing General Partner is a director of a company with a class of securities
registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All of
the directors and officers of the Managing General Partner also serve as
directors and officers of one or more corporations which serve as general
partners of publicly-traded real estate limited partnerships which are
affiliated with the Managing General Partner.
(f) Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings.
None.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
----------------------
Under the Partnership Agreement, the General Partners and their
affiliates are entitled to receive various fees, commissions, cash
distributions, allocations of taxable income or loss and expense reimbursements
from the Partnership. See Notes 1 and 6 of Notes to Financial Statements.
The following table sets forth the amounts of the fees and cash
distributions and reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses which the Partnership
paid to or accrued for the account of the General Partners and their affiliates
for the year ended December 31, 1996. Cash distributions to General Partners
include amounts distributed after year-end with respect to 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Receiving Entity Type of Compensation Amount of Compensation
- ---------------- -------------------- and Reimbursement
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
AEW Real Estate Advisors, Inc. Management Fees and Reimbursement of $ 177,680
(formerly known as Copley Real Expenses
Estate Advisors, Inc.)
General Partners Share of Distributable Cash 16,752
New England Securities Corporation Servicing Fees and Reimbursement of 2,702
Expenses
Back Bay Advisors, L.P. Servicing Fee 1,808
---------
TOTAL $ 198,942
==========
</TABLE>
For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Partnership allocated $13,302
of taxable income to the General Partners.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
--------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.
-----------------------------------------------
As of December 31, 1996, Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Company
of America, whose address is 2700 Sanders Road, Prospect Heights, IL., 60070,
owned 5,000 Units, approximately 18% of the total number of Units outstanding.
No other person or group is known by the Partnership to be the beneficial owner
of more than 5% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 1996. Under the
Partnership
<PAGE>
Agreement, the voting rights of the Limited Partners are limited and, in some
circumstances, are subject to the prior receipt of certain opinions of counsel
or judicial decisions.
Except as expressly provided in the Partnership Agreement, the
right to manage the business of the Partnership is vested exclusively in the
Managing General Partner.
(b) Security Ownership of Management.
--------------------------------
The General Partners of the Partnership owned no Units at
December 31, 1996.
(c) Changes in Control.
------------------
There exists no arrangement known to the Partnership the
operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the
Partnership.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
----------------------------------------------
The Partnership has no relationships or transactions to report
other than as reported in Item 11, above.
PART IV
-------
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statements, and Reports on Form 8-K.
-------------------------------------------------------
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements--The Financial Statements listed on
the accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Schedule and Financial
Statements Index No. 2 are filed as part of this Annual Report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules--The Financial Statement
Schedule listed on the accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Schedule
is filed as part of this Annual Report.
(3) Exhibits--The Exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit
Index are filed as a part of this Annual Report and incorporated in this Annual
Report as set forth in said Index.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. No Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed
during the fourth quarter of 1996.
<PAGE>
Copley Realty Income Partners 3;
A Limited Partnership
Financial Statements
* * * * * * *
December 31, 1996
<PAGE>
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page #
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Accountants.......................................
Financial Statements:...................................................
Balance Sheet - December 31, 1996 and 1995......................
Statement of Operations - For the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994...............................
Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital (Deficit) - For the
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994..................
Statement of Cash Flows - For the Years Ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994..................................................
Notes to Financial Statements...................................
Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation at
December 31, 1996...............................................
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Report of Independent Accountants
---------------------------------
To the Partners
Copley Realty Income Partners 3;
A Limited Partnership
In our opinion, based upon our audits and the reports of other auditors for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Copley Realty Income Partners 3; A Limited Partnership (the
"Partnership") at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These
financial statements are the responsibility of Third Income Corp., the Managing
General Partner of the Partnership; our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the
financial statements of the Partnership's Shasta Way joint venture investee for
the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 which results of operations are
recorded using the equity method of accounting in the Partnership's financial
statements. Equity in joint venture income for Shasta Way was $328,348, $312,772
and $234,834 for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
We also did not audit the financial statements of the Partnership's investment
in South Bay Associates for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995.
Operating income for this investment totaled $431,682 for the year ended
December 31, 1996 and equity in joint venture income was $315,789 for the year
ended December 31, 1995. We also did not audit the financial statements of Brea
West, a wholly-owned property, for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995,
which statements reflect operating income of $891,127 and $880,763 for the years
then ended. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports
thereon have been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as
it relates to the amounts included for the equity in joint venture income for
Shasta Way for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, for the
operating income and equity in joint venture income for South Bay Associates for
the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for operating income for Brea
West for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, is based solely on the
reports of the other auditors. We conducted our audits of these statements in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by the Managing General Partner, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other
auditors for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 provide a
reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Partnership changed its
method of accounting for impaired long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to
be disposed of effective January 1, 1995 in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of".
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
- -------------------------
Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 1997
<PAGE>
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BALANCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
----------------------------------------------
1996 1995
------------------ -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Real estate investments:
Joint ventures $ 5,531,652 $ 10,041,168
Property, net 11,789,227 7,910,129
----------------- ------------------
17,320,879 17,951,297
Cash and cash equivalents 1,798,785 1,695,180
Short-term investments 503,111 604,309
----------------- ------------------
$ 19,622,775 $ 20,250,786
================= ==================
Liabilities and Partners' Capital
Accounts payable $ 45,692 $ 56,778
Accrued management fee 41,420 41,420
----------------- ------------------
Total liabilities 87,112 98,198
----------------- ------------------
Partners' capital (deficit):
Limited partners ($1,000 per unit,
100,000 units authorized; 27,641
units issued and outstanding) 19,582,641 20,193,397
General partners (46,978) (40,809)
----------------- ------------------
Total partners' capital 19,535,663 20,152,588
----------------- ------------------
$ 19,622,775 $ 20,250,786
================= ==================
</TABLE>
(See accompanying notes to financial statements)
<PAGE>
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------------ ----------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Activity
Property rentals $ 1,559,843 $ 1,003,979 $ 995,952
Property operating expenses (237,034) (123,216) (123,421)
Depreciation and amortization (428,413) (332,619) (332,619)
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
894,396 548,144 539,912
Joint venture earnings 328,348 628,561 565,505
Investment valuation allowance - - (2,400,000)
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total real estate operations 1,222,744 1,176,705 (1,294,583)
Interest on cash equivalents
and short-term investments 104,987 117,066 89,535
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total investment activity 1,327,731 1,293,771 (1,205,048)
------------------ ----------------- -------------------
Portfolio Expenses
Management fee 165,680 158,777 138,067
General and administrative 103,764 109,670 108,761
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
269,444 268,447 246,828
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
Net Income (Loss) $ 1,058,287 $ 1,025,324 $ (1,451,876)
================== ================= ==================
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership unit $ 37.90 $ 36.72 $ (52.00)
================= ================ ==================
Cash distributions per limited
partnership unit $ 60.00 $ 55.00 $ 50.00
================= ================ =================
Number of limited partnership
units outstanding during the year 27,641 27,641 27,641
================== ================= ==================
</TABLE>
(See accompanying notes to financial statements)
<PAGE>
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
------------------------------------ ----------------------------------
General Limited General Limited
Partners Partners Partners Partners
--------------- ----------------- --------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year $ (40,809) $ 20,193,397 $ (35,706) $ 20,698,581
Cash distributions (16,752) (1,658,460) (15,356) (1,520,255)
Net income (loss) 10,583 1,047,704 10,253 1,015,071
-------------- ---------------- -------------- -----------------
Balance at end of year $ (46,978) $ 19,582,641 $ (40,809) $ 20,193,397
============== ================ ============== =================
Year ended December 31,
------------------------------------
1994
------------------------------------
General Limited
Partners Partners
----------------- ------------------
$ (7,227) $ 23,517,988
(13,960) (1,382,050)
(14,519) (1,437,357)
----------------- ------------------
$ (35,706) $ 20,698,581
================= ==================
</TABLE>
(See accompanying notes to financial statements)
<PAGE>
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 1,058,287 $ 1,025,324 $ (1,451,876)
Adjustments to reconcile net
income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 428,413 332,619 332,619
Investment valuation allowance - - 2,400,000
Equity in joint venture net income (328,348) (628,561) (565,505)
Cash distributions from joint ventures 694,437 939,499 732,650
Increase (decrease) in net operating
liabilities (11,766) 4,284 3,471
Decrease in property working capital 22,751 19,149 14,438
----------------- ------------------ -------------------
Net cash provided by operating
activities 1,863,774 1,692,314 1,465,797
----------------- ------------------ -------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in property (186,836) - -
Investment in joint ventures - (68,687) (215,000)
Decrease (increase) in short-term
investments, net 101,879 (597,870) 1,409,067
----------------- ------------------ -------------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (84,957) (666,557) 1,194,067
----------------- ------------------ -------------------
Cash flows from financing activity:
Distributions to partners (1,675,212) (1,535,611) (1,396,010)
----------------- ------------------ -------------------
Net cash used in financing activity (1,675,212) (1,535,611) (1,396,010)
----------------- ------------------ -------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents 103,605 (509,854) 1,263,854
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of year 1,695,180 2,205,034 941,180
----------------- ------------------ -------------------
End of year $ 1,798,785 $ 1,695,180 $ 2,205,034
================= ================== ===================
</TABLE>
Non-cash transaction:
Effective January 1, 1996, the Partnership's joint venture investment
in South Bay/CRIP 3 Associates was converted to a wholly-owned property. The
carrying value of this investment at conversion was $4,180,704.
(See accompanying notes to financial statements)
<PAGE>
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
- ----------------------------------
General
- -------
Copley Realty Income Partners 3; A Limited Partnership (the
"Partnership") is a Massachusetts limited partnership organized for the purpose
of investing primarily in newly constructed and existing income-producing real
properties. The Partnership commenced operations in October 1988, and acquired
the three real estate investments it currently owns prior to the end of 1989. It
intends to dispose of its investments within nine years of their acquisition,
and then liquidate.
The Managing General Partner of the Partnership is Third Income Corp.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEW Real Estate Advisors, Inc. ("AEW"), formerly
known as Copley Real Estate Advisors. The associate general partner is GCOP
Associates Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership, the general
partners of which are managing directors of AEW and/or officers of the Managing
General Partner. Subject to the Managing General Partner's overall authority,
the business of the Partnership is managed by AEW pursuant to an advisory
contract.
On December 10, 1996, Copley's parent, New England Investment
Companies, Limited Partnership ("NEIC"), a publicly traded master limited
partnership, acquired certain assets subject to then existing liabilities from
Aldrich, Eastman & Waltch, Inc. and its affiliates and principals (collectively
"the AEW Operations"). Simultaneously, a new entity, AEW Capital Management L.P.
was formed, into which NEIC contributed its interests in Copley and its
affiliates. As a result, the AEW Operations were combined with Copley to form
the business operations of AEW Capital Management, L.P. This transaction is not
expected to have a material effect on the operations of the Partnership.
Prior to August 30, 1996, New England Mutual Life Insurance Company
("The New England") was NEIC's principal unit holder and owner of all the
outstanding stock of NEIC's general partner. On August 30, 1996, The New England
merged with and into Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("Met Life"). Met Life
is the surviving entity and, therefore, through a wholly-owned subsidiary,
became the owner of the units of partnership interest previously owned by The
New England and of the stock of NEIC's general partner. This transaction is not
expected to have a material effect on the operations of the Partnership.
Management
- ----------
AEW, as advisor, is entitled to receive stipulated fees from the
Partnership in consideration of services performed in connection with the
management of the Partnership and acquisition and disposition of Partnership
investments in real property. Partnership management fees are 9% of
distributable cash flow from operations, as defined, before deducting such fees.
AEW is also reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with administering
the Partnership ($12,000 in 1996, $11,646 in 1995, and $10,072 in 1994).
Acquisition fees were based on 3% of the gross proceeds from the offering and
paid at the time commitments were initially funded. Disposition fees are
generally 3% of the selling price of the property, but are subject to the prior
receipt by the limited partners of their capital contributions plus a stipulated
return thereon.
<PAGE>
New England Securities Corporation, an indirect subsidiary of Met Life,
is engaged by the Partnership to act as its unit holder servicing agent. Fees
and out-of-pocket expenses for such services totaled $2,702, $2,437 and $3,388
in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Fees to Back Bay Advisors, L.P., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of NEIC, for short-term investment advisory services
totaled $1,808, $1,795 and $1,739 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
- ---------------------------------------------------
Accounting Estimates
- --------------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires the Managing General Partner to make
estimates affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and of
revenues and expenses. In the Partnership's business, certain estimates require
an assessment of factors not within management's control, such as the ability of
tenants to perform under long-term leases and the ability of the properties to
sustain their occupancies in changing markets. Actual results, therefore, could
differ from those estimates.
Real Estate Joint Ventures
- --------------------------
Investments in joint ventures, including loans made to joint ventures,
which are in substance real estate investments, are stated at cost, plus (minus)
equity in undistributed joint venture income (losses). Allocations of joint
venture income (losses) were made to the Partnership's venture partners as long
as they had substantial economic equity in the project. Economic equity is
measured by the excess of the appraised value of the property over the
Partnership's total cash investment plus accrued preferential returns and
interest thereon. Currently, the Partnership records an amount equal to 100% of
the operating results of the property, after the elimination of all inter-entity
transactions, except for the venture which includes an affiliate of the
Partnership, which has substantial economic equity in the project. Joint
ventures are consolidated with the accounts of the Partnership if, and when, the
venture partner no longer shares in the control of the business.
Property
- --------
Property includes land and buildings and improvements, which are stated
at cost less accumulated depreciation, plus other operating assets and
liabilities. The Partnership's initial carrying value of a property previously
owned by a joint venture equals the Partnership's carrying value of the
predecessor investment on the conversion date.
Capitalized Costs, Depreciation and Amortization
- ------------------------------------------------
Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred; significant
improvements and renewals are capitalized. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the buildings and
improvements. Leasing costs are also capitalized and amortized over the related
lease terms.
Acquisition fees have been capitalized as part of the cost of real
estate investments. Amounts not related to land are being amortized using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the underlying real
property.
Certain tenant leases provide for rent concessions at the beginning of
the lease terms and for rental increases over the lease terms. Rental revenue is
being recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease terms.
<PAGE>
Realizability of Real Estate Investments
- ----------------------------------------
The Partnership considers a real estate investment to be impaired when
it determines the carrying value of the investment is not recoverable through
expected undiscounted cash flows from the operations and disposition of the
property. The impairment loss is based on the excess of the investment's
carrying value over its estimated fair market value. For investments being held
for sale, the impairment loss also includes estimated costs of sale. Property
held for sale is not depreciated during the holding period. Prior to the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 as of January 1,
1995, the reduction in the investment carrying value was to estimated net
realizable value.
The carrying value of an investment may be more or less than its
current appraised value. At December 31, 1996, the appraised value of each
investment exceeded its carrying value; the aggregate excess was approximately
$1,700,000. At December 31, 1995, the appraised value of one of the investments
exceeded its related carrying value by $260,000; the appraised values of the two
other investments were less than the related carrying values by an aggregate
$160,000.
The current appraised value of real estate investments has been
estimated by the Managing General Partner and is generally based on a
combination of traditional appraisal approaches performed by the Partnership's
advisor and independent appraisers. Because of the subjectivity inherent in the
valuation process, the current appraised value may differ significantly from
that which could be realized if the real estate were actually offered for sale
in the marketplace.
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
- -------------------------------------------
Cash equivalents are stated at cost, plus accrued interest. The
Partnership considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a
maturity of ninety days or less to be cash equivalents; otherwise, they are
classified as short-term investments.
The Partnership has the positive intent and ability to hold all
short-term investments to maturity; therefore, short-term investments are
carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates market value. At
December 31, 1996 and 1995, all investments are in commercial paper with less
than one month and five months, respectively, remaining to maturity.
Income Taxes
- ------------
A partnership is not liable for income taxes and, therefore, no
provision for income taxes is made in the financial statements of the
Partnership. A proportionate share of the Partnership's income is reportable on
each partner's tax return.
Per Unit Computations
- ---------------------
Per unit computations are based on the number of units of limited
partnership interest outstanding during the year. The actual per unit amount
will vary by partner depending on the date of admission to, or withdrawal from,
the Partnership.
<PAGE>
NOTE 3 - REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES
- -----------------------------------
The Partnership was invested in two real estate joint ventures
organized as general partnerships with a real estate management/development firm
and, in one case, with an affiliate of the Partnership. The ownership of both
ventures was restructured in 1996, as described below. The Partnership made
capital contributions to the ventures, which are subject to preferential cash
distributions at a specified rate and to priority distributions with respect to
sale or refinancing proceeds. The Partnership also made a mortgage loan to one
of the ventures. The joint venture agreements provide for the funding of cash
flow deficits by the venture partners in proportion to ownership interests, and
for the dilution of ownership share in the event a venture partner does not
contribute proportionately.
The respective real estate management/development firm is responsible
for day-to-day development and operating activities, although overall authority
and responsibility for the business is shared by the venturers. The real estate
management/development firms, or their affiliates, also provide various services
to the joint ventures for a fee.
The following is a summary of cash invested in joint ventures, net of
returns of capital and excluding investment acquisition fees:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
Rate of Ownership --------------------------------
Investment/Location Return/Interest Interest 1996 1995
- ------------------- --------------- ------------- ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
South Bay Associates 10.0% (L) 1995-71.1% - $ 4,500,000
San Jose, CA 10.5% (C) - $ 2,528,247
Shasta Way
Simi Valley, CA 10.0% (C) 1995-34.8% $ 6,726,051 $ 6,726,051
1996-58%
(C) Capital contribution
(L) Loan
</TABLE>
Shasta Way
- ----------
On September 29, 1989, the Partnership entered into a joint venture
with an affiliate of the Partnership, and with an affiliate of The Hewson
Company, to construct and operate an industrial facility in Simi Valley,
California. The Partnership committed to make capital contributions of up to
$7,612,500, of which $7,111,757 was funded at December 31, 1996 and 1995. The
venture owns land on which it completed construction of an industrial building
in 1991. Effective January 1, 1996, the joint venture was restructured, and the
Hewson interest was assigned to the Partnership and its affiliate in proportion
to their respective ownership interests. The Partnership's ownership percentage
increased from 34.8% to 58%; its affiliate's interest was increased to 42%.
The aggregate minimum rents due to the venture under a non-cancelable
lease are: 1997 - $1,144,000, 1998 - $1,188,000.
South Bay Associates
- --------------------
Effective January 1, 1996, this joint venture was restructured and the
joint venture partner's ownership interest was assigned to the Partnership. The
investment is now being accounted for as a wholly-owned property. (See Note 4).
<PAGE>
Summarized Financial Information
- --------------------------------
The following summarized financial information is presented in the aggregate for
ventures:
Assets and Liabilities
----------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------------------------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Real property, at cost less
accumulated depreciation
of $1,709,771 and $1,829,810 $ 7,988,613 $ 14,326,926
Other 515,758 1,037,209
------------- -------------
8,504,371 15,364,135
Liabilities 74,585 99,956
------------- -------------
Net assets $ 8,429,786 $ 15,264,179
============= =============
</TABLE>
Results of Operations
---------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------------- ----------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue
Rental income $ 1,208,205 $ 1,696,790 $ 1,712,720
Lease termination fee - - 100,000
Other 3,636 4,934 11,706
--------------- ----------------- ---------------
1,211,841 1,701,724 1,824,426
--------------- ----------------- ---------------
Expenses
Operating expenses 183,211 314,583 401,225
Earthquake repair expense - - 109,610
Depreciation and amortization 460,785 529,694 575,638
--------------- ----------------- ---------------
643,996 844,277 1,086,473
--------------- ----------------- ---------------
Net income $ 567,845 $ 857,447 $ 737,953
=============== ================= ===============
</TABLE>
Liabilities and expenses exclude amounts owed and attributable to the
Partnership and (with respect to one joint venture) its affiliate on behalf of
their various financing arrangements with the joint ventures.
Amounts for 1996 relate only to the Shasta Way joint venture. Real
property in 1995 excludes a valuation allowance of $2,400,000 on the South Bay
investment recorded in 1994 by the Partnership.
<PAGE>
NOTE 4 - INVESTMENT IN PROPERTY
- -------------------------------
The following is a summary of the Partnership's investment in property:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Land $ 5,771,144 $ 2,991,854
Buildings and improvements 9,601,263 5,978,755
Accumulated depreciation (1,758,213) (1,402,497)
Investment valuation allowance (2,400,000) -
Deferred costs, net 445,638 402,230
Other net assets (liabilities) 129,395 (60,213)
------------------ ------------------
Net carrying value $ 11,789,227 $ 7,910,129
================== ==================
</TABLE>
The net carrying value at December 31, 1996 was comprised of Brea West
and South Bay at $7,561,745 and $4,227,482, respectively.
South Bay Associates
--------------------
On May 18, 1989, the Partnership entered into a joint venture with an
affiliate of South Bay Construction and Development Co. Inc., to acquire and
operate a research and development facility in San Jose, California. The
Partnership invested $7,028,247 in the joint venture in the form of capital
contributions and a mortgage loan. Effective January 1, 1996, the joint venture
was restructured and the joint venture partner's ownership interest was assigned
to the Partnership. The carrying value of the joint venture investment at
conversion ($4,180,704) was allocated to land, building and improvements, an
investment valuation allowance, and other net operating assets.
The Managing General Partner determined in 1994 that the carrying value
of the South Bay investment was impaired and should be reduced to net realizable
value, resulting in a charge to operations of $2,400,000.
The buildings and improvements of South Bay are being depreciated over
30 years, beginning January 1, 1996. The aggregate minimum rents due under a
non-cancelable lease are: 1997 -$459,000, 1998 -$491,550, 1999 -$513,000, 2000
- -$513,000, 2001 -$374,776.
Brea West
---------
On April 28, 1989, the Partnership entered into a joint venture
agreement to construct and operate an industrial facility in Brea, California.
The Partnership contributed $9,078,799 to the capital of the venture. The
venture partner was unable to fund its proportionate share of the cost overruns
and, effective June 30, 1991, the venture partner's ownership share was reduced
to zero and the property became wholly-owned by the Partnership.
The building is being depreciated over 30 years. Tenant improvements
are being depreciated over the term of the lease, which expires in September
2000. Minimum annual future rent payments are as follows: 1997 -$963,694, 1998 -
$963,694, 1999 - $963,694, 2000 - $722,770.
<PAGE>
NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES
- ---------------------
The Partnership's income for federal income tax purposes differs from
that reported in the accompanying statement of operations as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-------------- --------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income (loss) per financial
statements $ 1,058,287 $ 1,025,324 $ (1,451,876)
Timing differences:
Joint venture earnings 167,259 156,936 114,979
Rental revenue 24,517 19,318 18,578
Expenses 7,096 10,456 -
Depreciation 73,015 76,416 86,218
Valuation allowance - - 2,400,000
---------------- ------------------ -----------------
Taxable income $ 1,330,174 $ 1,288,450 $ 1,167,899
================ ================== =================
</TABLE>
NOTE 6 - PARTNERS' CAPITAL
- --------------------------
Allocation of net income (losses) from operations and distributions of
distributable cash from operations, as defined, are in the ratio of 99% to the
limited partners and 1% to the general partners. Cash distributions are made
quarterly.
Net sales proceeds and financing proceeds will be allocated first to
the limited partners to the extent of their contributed capital plus a
stipulated return thereon, as defined, second to pay disposition fees, and then
85% to the limited partners and 15% to the general partners. Income from sales
will be allocated in proportion to the distribution of related proceeds,
provided that the general partners are allocated at least 1%. Income or losses
from sales, if there are no residual proceeds after the repayment of the related
debt, will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the general
partners.
NOTE 7 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT
- -------------------------
Distributions of cash from operations relating to the quarter ended
December 31, 1996 were made on January 30, 1997 in the aggregate amount of
$418,803 ($15.00 per limited partnership unit).
<PAGE>
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Initial Cost to Costs Capitalized
the Partnership Subsequent to Acquisition
------------------------------------ ---------------------------------
Encum - Buildings & Other Carrying Improve-
Description brances Land Improvements (Net) Costs ments Other
- ----------- ------- ----------- ------------ --------- --------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
A single-story industrial Notes A
building on 7.51 acres in and B $2,917,098 $5,974,055 ($81,193) $74,756 $4,700 $353,790
Brea California.
A single-story industrial Notes A
building on 6.7 acres and B $1,699,290 $2,115,672 $365,742 $0 $186,836 ($63,306)
in San Jose, California.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Wholly-Owned $4,616,388 $8,089,727 $284,549 $74,756 $191,536 $290,484
==============================================================================
<CAPTION>
Gross amount at which
Carried at Close of Period
---------------------------------
Buildings & Accumulated Date of Date Depreciable
Description Land Improvements Other Total Depreciation Construction Acquired Life
- ----------- --------- ------------ -------- ----- ------------ ------------ -------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
A single-story industrial
building on 7.51 acres in $2,991,854 $5,978,755 $272,597 $9,243,206 $1,681,461 1990 06/30/91 30 Years
Brea California.
A single-story industrial
building on 6.7 acres $1,699,290 $2,302,508 $302,436 $4,304,234 $76,752 1976 05/18/89 30 Years
in San Jose, California.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Total Wholly-Owned $4,691,144 $8,281,263 $575,033 $13,547,440 $1,758,213
==============================================================
58% Interest in Hewson Shasta
Way Joint Venture. Owners of
an industrial building on 12.13 --------See Note B-------- $5,531,652 N/A 1991 9/29/89 31.5 Years
acres in Simi Valley, California.
----------
Total Joint Ventures $5,531,652
==========
</TABLE>
Note (A) Brea West investment restructured from joint venture to
wholly-owned property effective 6/30/91.
South Bay/CRIP 3 investment restructured from joint venture
to wholly-owned property effective 1/1/96.
<PAGE>
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SCHEDULE III - NOTE B
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
Reconciliation of Real INVESTMENT IN WHOLLY-OWNED
Estate Owned ---------------------------
ACCUMULATED
NET CHANGES IN BALANCE AMORTIZ'N AND
COST CAPITALIZED OTHER NET AS OF DEPRECIATION
DESCRIPTION AS OF 12/31/95 IMPROVEMENTS ASSETS AS OF 12/31/96 AS OF 12/31/95
--------------- -------------- ------------ ---------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Brea West, California $9,536,293 $0 ($26,221) $9,510,072 $1,626,164
South Bay/Crip 3 Associates $0 $4,367,540 ($40,904) $4,326,636 $0
<CAPTION>
1996 ACCUMULATED
AMORTIZ'N AND AMORTIZATION AND PROPERTY
DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION NET
EXPENSE AS OF 12/31/96 AS OF 12/31/96
------------- ---------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Brea West, California $322,163 $1,948,327 $7,561,745
South Bay/Crip 3 Associates $99,154 $99,154 $4,227,482
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1996 CASH
1996 CASH EQUITY IN RECEIVED
PERCENT OF BALANCE INVESTMENTS IN INCOME/ FROM
DESCRIPTION OWNERSHIP @ 12/31/95 JOINT VENTURES (LOSS) JOINT VENTURES
--------------- ---------- ---------- -------------- --------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
South Bay/Crip 3 Associates 100% $4,180,704 $0 $0 $0
Hewson Shasta Way 58% 5,860,464 0 328,348 (650,064)
----------- ------------ --------- ------------
$10,041,168 $0 $328,348 ($650,064)
=========== ============ ========= ============
<CAPTION>
1996
1996 CONVERSION TO
AMORTIZATION OF WHOLLY-OWNED BALANCE
ACQUISITION FEES PROPERTY @ 12/31/96
---------------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
South Bay/Crip 3 Associates $0 ($4,180,704) $0
Hewson Shasta Way (7,096) 0 5,531,652
---------------- ----------- ----------
($7,096) ($4,180,704) $5,531,652
================ =========== ==========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX NO. 2
Independent Auditor's Report and Financial Statements
of Hewson Shasta Way Associates
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page #
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Auditors from Ernst & Young LLP.........................................
Balance Sheet - December 31, 1996 and 1995....................................................
Statement of Operations - For the Years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.............................................................
Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital - For the Years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.............................................................
Statement of Cash Flows - For the Years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.............................................................
Notes to Financial Statements.................................................................
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Financial Statements
Shasta Way Associates
(A California General Partnership)
December 31, 1996 and 1995
<PAGE>
[LETTERHEAD OF ERNST AND YOUNG LLP APPEARS HERE]
Report of Independent Auditors
To the Partners
Shasta Way Associates
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Shasta Way Associates (a
California general partnership) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Shasta Way Associates as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Ernst & Young LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
January 14, 1997
1
<PAGE>
Shasta Way Associates
(A California General Partnership)
Balance Sheets
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31
1996 1995
-------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Cash $ 166,413 $ 103,331
Tenant receivables 270,294 421,532
Rental property
Land 2,977,867 2,977,867
Buildings 6,803,913 6,803,913
Accumulated depreciation (1,721,687) (1,296,422)
-------------------------------------
8,060,093 8,485,358
-------------------------------------
Other assets - net of accumulated amortization of $315,164 in 1996 and
$276,996 in 1995 79,051 117,219
-------------------------------------
$ 8,575,851 $ 9,127,440
=====================================
Liabilities and partners' capital
Security deposit $ 62,400 $ 62,400
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 12,185 8,171
Due to partners
CRIP 3 1,694,054 1,475,792
CRIP 4 1,226,586 1,068,589
Partners' capital 5,580,626 6,512,488
-------------------------------------
$ 8,575,851 $ 9,127,440
=====================================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
2
<PAGE>
Shasta Way Associates
(A California General Partnership)
Statements of Operations
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31
1996 1995 1994
---------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues
Rental income $ 1,045,432 $ 1,012,427 $ 1,001,425
Tenant reimbursements 162,773 151,424 156,069
Interest and other income 3,636 3,992 11,520
---------------------------------------------------------
1,211,841 1,167,843 1,169,014
---------------------------------------------------------
Expenses
Rental operating expenses 160,800 155,744 156,069
General and administrative 22,411 11,272 10,746
Depreciation and amortization 463,433 462,485 488,623
Guaranteed payments
CRIP 3 868,326 844,281 816,734
CRIP 4 628,733 611,374 591,428
Earthquake repairs - - 109,610
---------------------------------------------------------
2,143,703 2,085,156 2,173,210
---------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (931,862) $ (917,313) $(1,004,196)
=========================================================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes. 3
<PAGE>
Shasta Way Associates
(A California General Partnership)
Statements of Partners' Capital
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Hewson Copley Copley
Shasta Realty Realty
Way Income Income
L.P. Partners 3 Partners 4 Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Partners' capital - (deficit)
December 31, 1993 $ (604,984) $ 5,242,608 $ 3,796,373 $ 8,433,997
Net loss - 1994 - (582,434) (421,762) (1,004,196)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' capital - (deficit)
December 31, 1994 (604,984) 4,660,174 3,374,611 7,429,801
Net loss - 1995 - (532,041) (385,272) (917,313)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' capital - (deficit)
December 31, 1995 (604,984) 4,128,133 2,989,339 6,512,488
Transfer of interest 604,984 (350,891) (254,093) -
Net loss - 1996 - (540,480) (391,382) (931,862)
=====================================================================
Partners' capital -
December 31, 1996 $ - $ 3,236,762 $ 2,343,864 $ 5,580,626
=====================================================================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes. 4
<PAGE>
Shasta Way Associates
(A California General Partnership)
Statements of Cash Flows
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31
1996 1995 1994
---------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss $ (931,862) $ (917,313) $ (1,004,196)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization 463,433 462,485 488,623
Decrease (increase) in tenant receivables 151,238 74,093 (27,957)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and
accrued expenses 4,014 (672) 8,843
Increase in due to partners 376,259 480,655 540,662
---------------------------------------------------------
Total adjustments 994,944 1,016,561 1,010,171
---------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 63,082 99,248 5,975
---------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to rental property - (9,482) -
Deletions from other assets - - 3,356
---------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities - (9,482) 3,356
---------------------------------------------------------
Net increase in cash 63,082 89,766 9,331
Cash at beginning of year 103,331 13,565 4,234
=========================================================
Cash at end of year $ 166,413 $ 103,331 $ 13,565
=========================================================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes. 5
<PAGE>
Shasta Way Associates
(A California General Partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 1996 and 1995
1. Organization and Other Matters
Shasta Way Associates, formerly Hewson Shasta Way Associates (the Partnership),
was formed September 29, 1989 as a California general partnership for the
purpose of developing and operating a commercial industrial property in Simi
Valley, California. The percentage ownership interests through December 31, 1995
were as follows:
Hewson Shasta Way L.P., a California limited
partnership (Hewson) 40.0%
Copley Realty Income Partners 3 (CRIP 3) 34.8%
Copley Realty Income Partners 4 (CRIP 4) 25.2%
CRIP 3 and CRIP 4 were committed to contribute an aggregate of approximately
$13,125,000 to the Partnership; subsequently, the Partnership Agreement provides
for pro rata contributions by all partners. CRIP 3 and CRIP 4 contributed
$7,111,757 and $5,149,893, respectively, through December 31, 1996.
CRIP 3 and CRIP 4 are entitled to preferential cash payments to the extent of a
stipulated return on their invested capital (Note 4). Prior to 1992, for
financial reporting purposes, income and losses were allocated to the partners
in accordance with their respective ownership interests, based on the long-term
substance of the business enterprise and the requirement for all partners to
fund capital, as described above. For the years ended December 31, 1995 and
1994, losses were allocated entirely to CRIP 3 and CRIP 4.
On January 1, 1996, the partners executed an Amended and Restated Statement of
Partnership Agreement whereby Hewson transferred all of its right, title and
interest in and to the Partnership to CRIP 3 and CRIP 4. The percentage
ownership interests are as follows:
Copley Realty Income Partners 3 (CRIP 3) 58.0%
Copley Realty Income Partners 4 (CRIP 4) 42.0%
In 1996, income and losses are allocated to CRIP 3 and CRIP 4 in accordance with
the ownership interests.
6
<PAGE>
Shasta Way Associates
(A California General Partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Rental Property
Rental properties are stated at cost. In 1996, the Partnership adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of. SFAS No. 121
requires that real estate assets be evaluated for impairment if impairment
indicators are present. An impairment writedown to fair value would occur only
if the estimated undiscounted cash flows from the asset were less than the
carrying amount of the asset. At December 31, 1996, the Partnership does not
hold any assets that meet the impairment criteria of SFAS No. 121.
Income Recognition
The Partnership's rental property is leased to a tenant under an operating
lease. The lease includes a provision whereby the tenant is not responsible for
rental payments for specified occupancy periods. Rental income is recognized
over the lease term on a straight-line basis. Included in tenant receivables are
$197,519 and $296,278 of deferred rent receivable at December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
Income Taxes
Federal and state income taxes are not payable by the Partnership, since the
partners report their proportionate share of taxable income or loss on their
separate tax returns.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated lives of
the assets, which are 31.5 years for the building and the term of the tenant's
lease for tenant improvements.
Included in other assets are leasing commissions, which are amortized over the
term of the related tenant's lease.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
<PAGE>
Shasta Way Associates
(A California General Partnership)
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
3. Rental Property
At December 31, 1989 the rental property under development consisted of
approximately 12 acres of land, with two existing buildings. During 1990, the
existing buildings were demolished and construction of a 235,080 square-foot
industrial building commenced. Construction was completed in June 1991.
The Partnership's property is being leased to a tenant under an operating lease
which expires in December 1998. The lease provides for the tenant to reimburse
the Partnership for operating expenses.
The following is a schedule of approximate minimum lease payments as of December
31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997 $ 1,144,000
1998 1,188,000
Thereafter -
==================
$ 2,332,000
==================
</TABLE>
4. Related Party Transactions
Under the terms of the Partnership agreement, as amended, Hewson Properties,
Inc. (HPI), an affiliate of Hewson, was paid a development overhead fee of
$272,428. CRIP 3 and CRIP 4 were paid development overhead fees of $48,370 and
$35,026, respectively. These fees were paid beginning on the first day of the
month following the start of demolition of the existing buildings and were
capitalized to the rental property.
The Partnership agreement provides that CRIP 3 and CRIP 4 will be paid
guaranteed payments of 10% per annum on invested capital (as defined). The
cumulative unpaid guaranteed payments are included in due to partners in the
accompanying balance sheets.
Included in rental operating expenses are $40,783, $36,933 and $34,250 of
management fees paid to HPI in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. These fees are
paid at a rate of 3% of gross rental income received.
8
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
-------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Number Page Number
- -------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
10A. Joint Venture Agreement of South Bay/CRIP 3 *
Associates Joint Venture dated as of March 27,
1989 by and between Copley Realty Income Partners 3;
A Limited Partnership and SBC and D Co., Inc.
10B. General Partnership Agreement of Brea West *
Associates dated as of April 28, 1989 between BW
Partners and Copley Realty Income Partners 3; A
Limited Partnership.
10C. First Amendment to Brea West Associates General *
Partnership Agreement dated as of April 28, 1989
by and between Copley Realty Income Partners 3;
A Limited Partnership and BW Partners.
10D. Pledge and Security Agreement for Brea West *
Associates dated as of April 28, 1989 by and
among BW Partners, Copley Realty Income Partners
3; A Limited Partnership, and Tar Partners.
10E. General Partnership Agreement of Hewson Shasta Way *
Associates dated as of September 29, 1989 between
Hewson/Shasta Way L.P., Copley Realty Income
Partners 3; A Limited Partnership and Copley Realty
Income Partners 4; A Limited Partnership.
10F. Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instruction *
and Railroad Spur Agreement dated as of
May 17, 1991 by and between NI Industries, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, and Brea West Associates.
10G. Agreement for Dissolution, Distribution and *
Winding-Up of Brea West Associates dated
May 31, 1991 by and between BW Partners, a
California general partnership, and the
Registrant.
10H. Incentive Property Management Agreement *
effective as of May 31, 1991 by and between
TRI-Partners, a California general partnership,
and the Registrant.
10I. Lease between South Bay/CRIP 3, a California *
general partnership ("Landlord"), and Media Arts
Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Tenant)"
dated February 7, 1994.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
10J. First Amendment to Lease by and between *
South Bay/CRIP 3, a California
general partnership ("Landlord"), and Media Arts Group,
Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Tenant)" dated
April 15, 1994.
10K. Second Amendment to Lease by and between *
South Bay/CRIP 3, a California
general partnership ("Landlord"), and Media Arts Group,
Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Tenant)" dated
June 23, 1994.
10L. Promissory Note dated May 1, 1994 by and between *
South Bay/CRIP III Associates Joint Venture,
a California general partnership, as Holder,
and CXR Telcom Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation, as Maker.
10M. Assignment and Assumption and Indemnity Agreement *
dated January 1, 1996, by and between Hewson/Shasta
Way L.P., a California limited partnership ("Assignor"),
Copley Realty Income Partners 3; a Limited Partnership,
a Massachusetts limited partnership ("CRIP 3"), and
Copley Realty Income Partners 4; a Limited Partnership,
a Massachusetts limited partnership ("CRIP 4").
10N. First Amendment to General Partnership Agreement dated *
January 1, 1996, as amended to date (the "Partnership
Agreement") of Hewson Shasta Way Associates, a
California general partnership, by and among
Hewson/Shasta Way L.P., a California limited partnership,
Copley Realty Income Partners 3; a Limited Partnership,
a Massachusetts limited partnership ("CRIP 3"), and
Copley Realty Income Partners 4; a Limited Partnership,
a Massachusetts limited partnership ("CRIP 4").
</TABLE>
- -------------------------------------------------------
* Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
----------
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COPLEY REALTY INCOME PARTNERS 3;
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Date: March 31, 1997 By: /s/ Joseph W. O'Connor
----------------------
Joseph W. O'Connor
President of the
Managing General Partner
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
President, Principal
Executive Officer and
Director of the
/s/ Joseph W. O'Connor Managing General Partner March 31, 1997
- ------------------------------------
Joseph W. O'Connor
Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of the
/s/ Daniel C. Mackowiak Managing General Partner March 31, 1997
- ------------------------------------
Daniel C. Mackowiak
Director of the
/s/ Daniel J. Coughlin Managing General Partner March 31, 1997
- ------------------------------------
Daniel J. Coughlin
Director of the
/s/ James J. Finnegan Managing General Partner March 31, 1997
- ---------------------------
James J. Finnegan
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 1,798,785
<SECURITIES> 503,111
<RECEIVABLES> 0
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 2,301,896
<PP&E> 17,320,879
<DEPRECIATION> 1,758,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 19,622,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 87,112
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 19,535,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 19,622,775
<SALES> 1,888,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 1,993,178
<CGS> 237,034
<TOTAL-COSTS> 237,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 697,857
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> 1,058,287
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 1,058,287
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 1,058,287
<EPS-PRIMARY> 37.90
<EPS-DILUTED> 37.90
</TABLE>
