<PAGE>
This form of prospectus is filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and relates to
Registration Statement No. 333-04499.
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
1001 WALNUT STREET
KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64106
(816) 474-9800
October 11, 1996
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders of
Sentinel Financial Corporation ("Sentinel"). The special meeting is scheduled
to be held at the downtown Kansas City office of Sentinel located at 1001
Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri, on Thursday, October 31, 1996 at 10:00
a.m., local time. Notice of the special meeting, a Proxy Statement/Prospectus
and a form of proxy are enclosed.
The special meeting has been called in connection with the proposed merger
of Sentinel and its principal subsidiary, Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan
Association of Kansas City, with Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. ("Roosevelt")
and its principal subsidiary, Roosevelt Bank. In the merger, each share of
Sentinel common stock outstanding at the time of the merger (other than shares
held by holders who perfect dissenters' rights and other excluded shares)
would be converted into 1.4231 shares of Roosevelt common stock, subject to
adjustment as provided in the merger agreement. Following the merger,
Roosevelt would be the resulting holding company. Consummation of the merger
is subject to certain conditions, including the approval of the stockholders
of Sentinel.
The terms of the merger agreement were negotiated by the Board of Directors
in light of various factors, including Sentinel's and Roosevelt's recent
operating results, current financial condition and future prospects.
Sentinel's financial advisor, Trident Financial Corporation, an investment
banking firm experienced in the valuation of financial institutions, has
advised your Board of Directors that in its opinion the exchange ratio is fair
from a financial point of view to Sentinel stockholders as of October 10,
1996.
At the special meeting, Sentinel stockholders will consider and vote upon
approval of the merger. The Board of Directors has approved the merger and
believes that the merger is in the best interests of Sentinel and its
stockholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends that
you vote FOR approval of the merger.
If any other matters are properly brought before the special meeting, the
persons named in the accompanying form of proxy will vote the shares
represented by such proxy in the manner determined by a majority of the Board
of Directors. You are urged to read the accompanying Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, which provides information regarding the merger and
related matters.
Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares you own. ON
BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, I URGE YOU TO SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE EVEN IF YOU CURRENTLY PLAN TO ATTEND THE
SPECIAL MEETING. This will not prevent you from voting in person but will
assure that your vote is counted if you do not attend the special meeting.
Sincerely,
/s/ Craig D. Laemmli
Craig D. Laemmli
President and Chief Executive
Officer
PLEASE DO NOT SEND IN ANY STOCK CERTIFICATES AT THIS TIME.
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
1001 WALNUT STREET
KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64106
(816) 474-9800
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD OCTOBER 31, 1996
Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of Stockholders (the "Special
Meeting") of Sentinel Financial Corporation ("Sentinel") is scheduled to be
held at the downtown Kansas City office of Sentinel located at 1001 Walnut
Street, Kansas City, Missouri, on Thursday, October 31, 1996 at 10:00 a.m.,
local time.
A Proxy Card and a Proxy Statement/Prospectus for the Special Meeting are
enclosed.
The Special Meeting is for the purpose of considering and acting upon:
1. The approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization,
dated as of March 22, 1996, by and among Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.
("Roosevelt"), Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel and Sentinel Federal Savings and
Loan Association of Kansas City ("Sentinel Federal"), a copy of which is
included in the accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Appendix I, and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger of Sentinel
into Roosevelt, pursuant to which each outstanding share of Sentinel common
stock (other than shares held by holders who perfect dissenters' rights and
other excluded shares) would be converted into 1.4231 shares of Roosevelt
common stock (with cash paid in lieu of fractional share interests),
subject to adjustment as provided in the merger agreement and the merger of
Sentinel Federal with Roosevelt Bank.
2. Such other matters as may properly come before the Special Meeting.
The Board of Directors is not aware of any other business to come before the
Special Meeting.
Any action may be taken on any of the foregoing proposals at the Special
Meeting on the date specified. Stockholders of record at the close of business
on September 27, 1996 are the stockholders entitled to vote at the Special
Meeting.
A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is
available for the examination by any stockholder, for any purpose germane to
the meeting, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the main office of Sentinel
located at the address set forth above, for a period of ten days prior to the
Special Meeting, as well as at the meeting.
You are requested to fill in, sign and date the enclosed form of proxy which
is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors, and to mail it promptly in
the enclosed envelope. The proxy will not be used if you attend and vote at
the Special Meeting in person.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ John C. Spencer
John C. Spencer
Secretary
Kansas City, Missouri
October 10, 1996
IMPORTANT: THE PROMPT RETURN OF PROXIES WILL SAVE SENTINEL THE EXPENSE OF
FURTHER REQUESTS FOR PROXIES IN ORDER TO ENSURE A QUORUM AT THE SPECIAL
MEETING. A SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. NO
POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND IN ANY STOCK CERTIFICATES AT THIS TIME.
<PAGE>
PROXY STATEMENT
OF
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 31, 1996
----------------
PROSPECTUS
OF
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
UP TO 850,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK,
PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE
TO BE ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
PROPOSED MERGER OF
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
WITH AND INTO
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
----------------
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus relates to the proposed merger of Sentinel
Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Sentinel"), with and into
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (referred to herein as
"Roosevelt," "Roosevelt Financial" and the "Company"), and the merger of
Sentinel's principal subsidiary, Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association
of Kansas City ("Sentinel Federal"), with Roosevelt's principal subsidiary,
Roosevelt Bank ("Roosevelt Bank" or the "Bank") (collectively, the "Merger"),
as contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated
as of March 22, 1996 (the "Merger Agreement"), by and among Roosevelt,
Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel and Sentinel Federal. The Merger Agreement is
included as Appendix I hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus is being furnished to the holders of shares
of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of Sentinel ("Sentinel Common
Stock") in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of
Directors of Sentinel (the "Sentinel Board") for use at a Special Meeting of
Stockholders (the "Special Meeting"), scheduled to be held at the downtown
Kansas City office of Sentinel located at 1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City,
Missouri, on October 31, 1996, at 10:00 a.m., local time.
At the Special Meeting, the holders of Sentinel Common Stock will consider
and vote upon a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
Subject to the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the Merger
Agreement, each share of Sentinel Common Stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time (as defined below) of the Merger
(other than shares held by holders who perfect dissenters' rights and other
excluded shares) will be converted into the right to receive 1.4231 shares
(the "Exchange Ratio") of the common stock, par value $.01 per share, of
Roosevelt ("Roosevelt Common Stock"), with cash paid in lieu of fractional
share interests. The Exchange Ratio is subject to adjustment, such that if the
weighted average sale price of all Roosevelt Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq
National Market during the ten trading day period ending on the date that is
three trading days prior to the Closing Date of the Merger (the "Average Pre-
Closing Trading Price") is less than $15.83 per share, the Exchange Ratio
shall be equal to $22.525 divided by the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in
which case a greater number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock would be
issued than if there were no adjustment to the Exchange Ratio), and if the
Average Pre-Closing Trading Price is greater than $21.42 per share, the
Exchange Ratio shall be equal to $30.475 divided by the Average Pre-Closing
Trading Price (in which case fewer shares of Roosevelt Common Stock would be
issued than if there were no adjustment to the Exchange Ratio). Based on
<PAGE>
the last reported sale price for Roosevelt Common Stock on the Nasdaq National
Market on October 10, 1996 ($17.75 per share), the value of 1.4231 shares of
Roosevelt Common Stock as of that date would have been approximately $25.26.
At the present time, there is no established market in which shares of
Sentinel Common Stock are regularly traded, nor are there any uniformly quoted
prices for such shares. The last trade of shares of Sentinel Common Stock
known by management of Sentinel occurred during April 1996. The closing bid
price for Sentinel Common Stock on October 10, 1996 was $21.00 per share, as
reported by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. As of March 21, 1996, the last
trading day preceding public announcement of the proposed Merger, the last
reported sale price for Roosevelt Common Stock was $18.50 per share.
Sentinel's financial advisor has rendered an opinion to the effect that as of
March 22, 1996, as confirmed on October 10, 1996, the Exchange Ratio is fair
from a financial point of view to the stockholders of Sentinel. The Merger is
subject to certain conditions, including approval by the stockholders of
Sentinel. For additional information regarding the Merger Agreement and the
terms of the Merger, see "The Merger."
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus also constitutes a prospectus of Roosevelt,
filed as part of the Registration Statement (defined below) with respect to up
to 850,000 shares of Roosevelt Common Stock to be issued upon consummation of
the Merger pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement.
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus, and the accompanying notice and form of
proxy, are first being mailed to stockholders of Sentinel on or about October
11, 1996.
----------------
THE SHARES OF ROOSEVELT COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED
OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, THE OFFICE OF THRIFT
SUPERVISION, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY,
AND NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, THE OFFICE OF THRIFT
SUPERVISION, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR ANY OTHER AGENCY HAS PASSED
UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
THE SHARES OF ROOSEVELT COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY ARE NOT SAVINGS
ACCOUNTS, DEPOSITS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF ANY BANK OR SAVINGS ASSOCIATION AND
ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE BANK
INSURANCE FUND, THE SAVINGS ASSOCIATION INSURANCE FUND OR ANY OTHER
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY.
----------------
The date of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus is October 10, 1996
ii
<PAGE>
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Roosevelt and Sentinel are subject to the informational reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act") and, in accordance therewith, file reports, proxy statements and other
information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Such
reports, proxy statements and other information filed by Roosevelt and
Sentinel can be obtained, upon payment of prescribed fees, from the Public
Reference Section of the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20549. Such information can be inspected and copied at the
public reference facilities of the SEC located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room
1024, Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the SEC's Regional Offices located at
Citicorp Center, Suite 1400, 500 West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois 60661
and 7 World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New York, New York 10048. In addition,
the SEC maintains a Web site that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding Roosevelt's and Sentinel's
electronic filing with the SEC. The address of the SEC's Web site is
"http://www.sec.gov."
Roosevelt has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-4
(together with all amendments, schedules, and exhibits thereto, the
"Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), with respect to the shares of Roosevelt Common Stock to be
issued pursuant to and as contemplated by the Merger Agreement. This Proxy
Statement/Prospectus does not contain all the information set forth in the
Registration Statement, certain parts of which have been omitted in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Registration Statement is
available for inspection and copying as set forth above. Statements contained
in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other
document are not necessarily complete, and in each instance reference is made
to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by
such reference.
----------------
All information contained in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus with respect to
Roosevelt and its subsidiaries has been supplied by Roosevelt, and all
information with respect to Sentinel and its subsidiaries has been supplied by
Sentinel.
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any
representation other than those contained in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
and, if given or made, such information or representation should not be relied
upon as having been authorized. This Proxy Statement/Prospectus does not
constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, the
securities offered by this Proxy Statement/Prospectus, or the solicitation of
a proxy, in any jurisdiction, to or from any person to whom or from whom it is
unlawful to make such offer, solicitation of an offer or proxy solicitation in
such jurisdiction.
----------------
iii
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
INTRODUCTION.............................................................. i
AVAILABLE INFORMATION..................................................... iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS......................................................... iv
SUMMARY................................................................... 1
The Parties to the Merger............................................... 1
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. and Roosevelt Bank.................... 1
Sentinel Financial Corporation and Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan
Association of Kansas City........................................... 1
The Special Meeting..................................................... 2
Meeting Date; Record Date............................................. 2
Matters to Be Considered.............................................. 2
Vote Required......................................................... 2
Security Ownership.................................................... 2
The Merger.............................................................. 3
General............................................................... 3
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Board of Directors...... 3
Merger Consideration.................................................. 3
Treatment of Sentinel Stock Options................................... 4
Opinion of Financial Advisor.......................................... 4
Effective Time and Closing Date....................................... 4
Appraisal Rights...................................................... 4
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger............................ 5
Conditions to the Merger.............................................. 5
Regulatory Approvals.................................................. 5
Waiver and Amendment; Termination..................................... 5
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger................................ 6
Expenses; Termination Fee............................................. 6
Accounting Treatment.................................................. 6
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger................. 7
Effects of the Merger on Rights of Stockholders....................... 8
Nasdaq Listing........................................................ 8
Management After the Merger............................................. 8
COMPARATIVE STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION......................... 9
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS....................................................... 11
Recent Legislation...................................................... 11
Amendment of Financial Statements....................................... 12
New Purchase of Mortgage Servicing Rights............................... 12
The Company Studies Balance Sheet Restructuring......................... 12
Early Results Regarding Credit Card Initiative.......................... 13
Roosevelt's Caution Regarding Near-Term Expectations.................... 13
Broad Based Growth in Roosevelt's Retail Franchise Continues............ 13
Pending Acquisitions of Mutual and Community Charter.................... 14
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL
GROUP, INC............................................................... 15
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL
CORPORATION.............................................................. 18
COMPARATIVE UNAUDITED PER SHARE DATA...................................... 19
</TABLE>
iv
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND ROOSEVELT BANK....................... 20
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc......................................... 20
Bank Holding Company Regulation........................................ 21
Roosevelt Bank......................................................... 23
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY.............................................. 24
Sentinel Financial Corporation......................................... 24
Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City........... 24
THE SPECIAL MEETING...................................................... 24
Place, Time and Date................................................... 24
Matters to Be Considered............................................... 24
Record Date; Vote Required............................................. 25
Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof........................ 26
Proxies................................................................ 27
THE MERGER............................................................... 28
General................................................................ 28
Background of the Merger............................................... 28
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Board of Directors....... 30
Merger Consideration................................................... 31
Treatment of Sentinel Stock Options.................................... 32
Opinion of Financial Advisor........................................... 32
Effective Time and Closing Date........................................ 37
Appraisal Rights....................................................... 37
Fractional Shares...................................................... 40
Exchange of Certificates............................................... 40
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger............................. 41
Effect on Employees and Employee Benefit Plans of Sentinel............. 42
Representations and Warranties......................................... 43
Conditions to the Merger............................................... 43
Regulatory Approvals................................................... 44
Waiver and Amendment; Termination...................................... 44
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger................................. 45
Expenses; Termination Fee.............................................. 46
Accounting Treatment................................................... 47
The Bank Merger Agreement.............................................. 47
Resales of Roosevelt Common Stock by Affiliates........................ 47
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.................. 48
Nasdaq Listing......................................................... 49
MANAGEMENT AFTER THE MERGER.............................................. 49
BUSINESS OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. ............................. 50
General................................................................ 50
Roosevelt's Philosophy and Operating Strategy.......................... 50
Acquisitions........................................................... 58
Lending Activities..................................................... 58
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities.............................. 62
Classified Assets, Loan Delinquencies and Defaults..................... 66
Provisions for Losses on Loans and Real-Estate Owned................... 66
Deposits and Other Sources of Funds.................................... 69
Asset/Liability Management............................................. 70
Subsidiaries........................................................... 71
Regulation............................................................. 71
</TABLE>
v
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Competition............................................................ 80
Employees.............................................................. 80
PROPERTIES OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC............................. 80
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND ROOSEVELT
BANK.................................................................... 80
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. ............... 82
COMPARISON OF YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994 AND 1993............... 82
General................................................................ 82
Results of Operations.................................................. 82
Financial Condition.................................................... 93
Asset Quality.......................................................... 93
Asset/Liability Management............................................. 95
Liquidity and Capital Resources........................................ 98
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices................................ 99
Accounting Developments................................................ 99
Selected Quarterly Financial Data...................................... 101
COMPARISON OF THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND 1995.......... 104
Results of Operations.................................................. 104
Financial Condition.................................................... 113
Asset Quality.......................................................... 113
Asset/Liability Management............................................. 115
Liquidity and Capital Resources........................................ 116
MANAGEMENT OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC............................. 117
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. ............... 119
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS OF ROOSEVELT
FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. .................................................. 123
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF OF ROOSEVELT
FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. .................................................. 124
BUSINESS OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION............................... 125
General................................................................ 125
Lending Activities..................................................... 125
Investment Activities.................................................. 132
Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds.......................... 134
Subsidiaries........................................................... 137
Competition............................................................ 137
Personnel.............................................................. 137
PROPERTIES OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION............................. 138
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SENTINEL
FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY..................... 138
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION......................... 139
General................................................................ 139
Operating Strategy..................................................... 139
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 1995 and 1996............ 140
Comparison of Operating Results for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
1995 and 1996......................................................... 140
Comparison of Operating Results for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
1995 and 1994......................................................... 142
Average Balances Interest and Average Yields/Cost...................... 144
Yields Earned and Rates Paid........................................... 145
Rate/Volume Table...................................................... 145
</TABLE>
vi
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Asset and Liability Management.......................................... 146
Liquidity and Capital Resources......................................... 147
New Accounting Standards................................................ 148
REGULATION OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS
AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY...................................... 149
General................................................................. 149
Federal Regulation of Savings Associations.............................. 149
Savings and Loan Holding Company Regulation............................. 155
Federal Taxation........................................................ 156
Missouri Taxation....................................................... 157
DESCRIPTION OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. COMMON STOCK............... 159
CERTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS.......................................... 159
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION....................................... 165
Introduction............................................................ 165
Capital Stock........................................................... 165
Special Meetings of Stockholders........................................ 165
Advance Notice Requirements for Nominations of Directors and
Presentation of New Business at Annual Meetings of Stockholders........ 165
Number and Term of Directors............................................ 166
Removal of Directors.................................................... 166
Business Combinations with Certain Persons.............................. 167
Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.................... 167
Control Share Acquisitions.............................................. 168
LEGAL MATTERS............................................................. 169
EXPERTS................................................................... 169
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS..................................................... 169
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS................................................... 169
OTHER MATTERS............................................................. 170
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. .................. RF-A
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION.................... F-1
</TABLE>
APPENDICES
I. Agreement and Plan of Merger (omitting schedules and exhibits)
II. Fairness Opinion of Trident Financial Corporation
III. Text of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
vii
<PAGE>
SUMMARY
The following is a brief summary of certain information contained elsewhere
in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Certain capitalized terms used in this
summary are defined elsewhere in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus. This summary
is not intended to be a complete description of all material facts regarding
Roosevelt, Sentinel and the matters to be considered at the Special Meeting and
is qualified in its entirety by, and reference is made to, the more detailed
information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus, and the
accompanying Appendices.
THE PARTIES TO THE MERGER
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND ROOSEVELT BANK
Roosevelt, a Delaware corporation, is the holding company for Roosevelt Bank,
a federally chartered savings bank headquartered in Chesterfield, Missouri. As
of June 30, 1996, Roosevelt had total consolidated assets of $9.3 billion,
deposits of $5.0 billion and stockholders' equity of $516 million. Roosevelt's
business has consisted primarily of the business of Roosevelt Bank and its
subsidiaries. The executive offices of Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank are located
at 900 Roosevelt Parkway, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, and the telephone
number at that address is (314) 532-6200.
Roosevelt Bank is a federally chartered savings bank with $9.3 billion in
consolidated total assets at June 30, 1996, making it the largest Missouri-
based thrift institution. Roosevelt Bank has 79 full-service offices, including
38 offices serving the St. Louis metropolitan area and nine offices serving the
Kansas City metropolitan area.
Roosevelt's business consists primarily of attracting deposits from the
general public and using those deposits, together with borrowings and other
funds, to originate and acquire real estate and consumer loans to acquire
mortgage-backed securities, to perform loan servicing functions for others, and
to provide other retail banking and financial services to consumers. The
principal elements of Roosevelt's business plan are (i) the origination of a
higher percentage of its assets; (ii) the diversification of its balance sheet
away from only mortgage and real estate related assets; (iii) the expansion of
its retail deposit base with a simultaneous shift within that deposit base
toward checking and transaction accounts; and (iv) growth in fee income by
providing other services such as insurance, brokerage and mortgage loan
servicing for other investors.
Since 1990, Roosevelt has pursued a program of acquiring other in-market and
adjacent market thrift institutions, and in April 1996 entered into agreements
to acquire two additional Missouri-based financial institution holding
companies and their subsidiary institutions. Following the acquisition of one
such institution, Missouri State Bank and Trust Company ("Missouri State
Bank"), Roosevelt, which is currently regulated as a savings and loan holding
company under the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933 (the "HOLA"), will no longer be
regulated as a savings and loan holding company but only as a bank holding
company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the "BHCA"). The
permissible activities of a bank holding company are more restrictive than
those afforded to a savings and loan holding company. See "Roosevelt Financial
Group, Inc. and Roosevelt Bank--Bank Holding Company Regulation."
For additional information concerning Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank, see
"Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. and Roosevelt Bank" and "Business of Roosevelt
Financial Group, Inc."
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY
Sentinel is a Delaware corporation formed in September 1993 to act as the
holding company for Sentinel Federal upon the completion of Sentinel Federal's
conversion from mutual to stock form of ownership (the "Conversion"). The
Conversion was completed on January 7, 1994. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel had
total
1
<PAGE>
consolidated assets of $143.8 million, deposits of $123.3 million and
stockholders' equity of $11.7 million. The executive offices of Sentinel and
Sentinel Federal are located at 1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri
64106, and the telephone number at that address is (816) 474-9800.
Sentinel Federal is a federally chartered savings and loan association
headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri. Sentinel Federal's principal business
consists of attracting deposits from the general public, originating loans
secured primarily by owner-occupied residential properties and purchasing
mortgage-related securities through the secondary market. To a significantly
lesser extent, Sentinel Federal also originates consumer, commercial real
estate and commercial business loans.
On December 20, 1989, Sentinel Federal entered into a Supervisory Agreement
with the Office of Thrift Supervision (the "OTS") as a result of OTS criticisms
of Sentinel Federal's policies and operations and its reduced capital position.
In May 1990, Sentinel Federal also signed a Capital Plan agreement as a result
of its low level of core capital. The Capital Plan was terminated on June 1,
1994 due to increases in capital levels primarily as a result of the initial
public offering completed as part of the Conversion. However, the Supervisory
Agreement remains in effect until terminated by the OTS. The Supervisory
Agreement requires Sentinel Federal to follow certain limitations primarily
relating to Sentinel Federal's internal operations, lending activities and
investments. For additional information concerning Sentinel and Sentinel
Federal, see "Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data of Sentinel
Financial Corporation" and "Business of Sentinel Financial Corporation."
THE SPECIAL MEETING
MEETING DATE; RECORD DATE
The Special Meeting is scheduled to be held at the downtown Kansas City
office of Sentinel, located at 1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri, on
Thursday, October 31, 1996 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and any and all
adjournments or postponements thereof. Only holders of record of Sentinel
Common Stock at the close of business on September 27, 1996 (the "Record Date")
are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED
At the Special Meeting, holders of shares of Sentinel Common Stock will vote
on a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby. Sentinel stockholders also may consider and vote upon such other
matters as are properly brought before the Special Meeting.
VOTE REQUIRED
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of Sentinel Common Stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is required
for approval of the Merger Agreement. As of the Record Date, there were 513,423
shares of Sentinel Common Stock entitled to be voted at the Special Meeting.
Approval of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Sentinel is a
condition to, and is required for, consummation of the Merger. See "The
Merger--Conditions to the Merger."
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
As of the Record Date, the directors and executive officers of Sentinel and
their affiliates beneficially owned in the aggregate 64,305 shares (excluding
44,620 underlying stock options, which shares may not be voted at the Special
Meeting), or 12.5% of the then outstanding shares of Sentinel Common Stock
entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. The directors of Sentinel have entered
into voting agreements with Roosevelt (the "Voting
2
<PAGE>
Agreements") whereby such directors have agreed to vote all shares of Sentinel
Common Stock owned by them (57,241 shares in the aggregate) for approval of the
Merger Agreement. As of the Record Date, directors and executive officers of
Roosevelt and their affiliates beneficially owned in the aggregate 1,000 shares
of Sentinel Common Stock.
For additional information, see "The Special Meeting."
THE MERGER
The following full text of the Merger Agreement, which is attached hereto as
Appendix I and is incorporated by reference herein.
GENERAL
The stockholders of Sentinel are being asked to consider and vote upon a
proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which Sentinel will be
merged with and into Roosevelt, with Roosevelt as the surviving entity, and
Sentinel Federal will be merged with Roosevelt Bank. The name of the surviving
entities following consummation of the Merger will be "Roosevelt Financial
Group, Inc." and "Roosevelt Bank," respectively. See "The Merger--General."
REASONS FOR THE MERGER; RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
At a meeting held on March 21, 1996, the Sentinel Board unanimously adopted
the Merger Agreement and approved the transactions contemplated thereby and
determined that the Merger would be in the best interests of Sentinel and its
stockholders. The Sentinel Board therefore recommends that stockholders vote
FOR approval of the Merger Agreement at the Special Meeting.
For a discussion of the factors considered by the Sentinel Board in reaching
its decision to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the transactions
contemplated thereby, see "The Merger--Background of the Merger" and "--Reasons
for the Merger; Recommendation of the Board of Directors."
MERGER CONSIDERATION
Subject to the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the Merger
Agreement, each share of Sentinel Common Stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time of the Merger (other than shares held
by holders who perfect dissenters' rights and other excluded shares) will be
converted into the right to receive 1.4231 shares of Roosevelt Common Stock
(the "Exchange Ratio" and the "Merger Consideration," respectively). See "The
Merger--Merger Consideration." Each share of Roosevelt Common Stock issued and
outstanding at the Effective Time will remain outstanding and unchanged as a
result of the Merger.
The Exchange Ratio is subject to adjustment, such that if the weighted
average sale price of all Roosevelt Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq National
Market during the ten trading day period ending on the date that is three
trading days prior to the Closing Date of the Merger (the "Average Pre-Closing
Trading Price") is less than $15.83 per share the Exchange Ratio shall be equal
to $22.525 divided by the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in which case a
greater number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock would be issued than if
there were no adjustment to the Exchange Ratio), and if the Average Pre-Closing
Trading Price is greater than $21.42 per share the Exchange Ratio shall be
equal to $30.475 divided by the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in which
case fewer shares of Roosevelt Common Stock would be issued than if there were
no adjustment to the Exchange Ratio). Based on the last reported sale price for
Roosevelt Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market on October 10, 1996
($17.75 per share), the value of 1.4231 shares of Roosevelt Common Stock as of
that date
3
<PAGE>
would have been approximately $25.26. At the present time, there is no
established market in which shares of Sentinel Common Stock are regularly
traded, nor are there any uniformly quoted prices for such shares. The last
trade of shares of Sentinel Common Stock known by management of Sentinel
occurred during April 1996. The closing bid price for Sentinel Common Stock on
October 10, 1996 was $21.00 per share, as reported by the National Quotation
Bureau, Inc. The market value of Roosevelt Common Stock to be received in the
Merger, however, is subject to fluctuation. Fluctuations in the market price of
Roosevelt Common Stock would generally result in an increase or decrease in the
value of the Merger Consideration to be received by Sentinel stockholders in
the Merger. An increase in the market value of Roosevelt Common Stock would
generally increase the market value of the Merger Consideration to be received
by Sentinel stockholders in the Merger. A decrease in the market value of
Roosevelt Common Stock would generally have the opposite effect. See "The
Merger--Merger Consideration." Sentinel Stockholders are urged to obtain
current market quotations for Roosevelt Common Stock.
TREATMENT OF SENTINEL STOCK OPTIONS
At the Effective Time, Sentinel's 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "Sentinel
Option Plan") and each outstanding option thereunder (including options granted
to non-employee directors of Sentinel pursuant to any amendment of the Sentinel
Option Plan) to purchase Sentinel Common Stock (the "Sentinel Stock Options")
will be assumed by Roosevelt. Upon such assumption, each Sentinel Stock Option
shall become an option to purchase the number of shares of Roosevelt Common
Stock equal to the product of the number of shares of Sentinel Common Stock
subject to the original option and the Exchange Ratio, with an appropriate
adjustment to the exercise price under each substituted option and otherwise
subject to the terms of the Sentinel Option Plan. See "The Merger--Treatment of
Sentinel Stock Options."
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR
Sentinel has retained Trident Financial Corporation ("Trident") as its
financial advisor in connection with the transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement to evaluate the financial terms of the Merger. See "The
Merger--Background of the Merger" and "--Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation
of the Board of Directors."
Trident has delivered an opinion that as of March 22, 1996, as confirmed on
October 10, 1996, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view,
to the holders of Sentinel Common Stock. A copy of Trident's opinion dated
October 10, 1996 is attached to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Appendix II
and is incorporated by reference herein. See "The Merger--Opinion of Financial
Advisor."
EFFECTIVE TIME AND CLOSING DATE
The Merger shall become effective at the time and on the date of the filing
of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware for the
Company Merger and articles of combination with the OTS for the Bank Merger
(the "Effective Time"). Such filings will occur as soon as practicable after
the satisfaction or waiver of all of the conditions to the Merger. The closing
of the Merger shall occur no later than 10:00 a.m. on the last business day of
the first calendar month following the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions
and obligations precedent of Roosevelt and Sentinel to consummate the Merger,
or at another time agreed to by Roosevelt and Sentinel (the "Closing Date").
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Under Delaware law, each holder of Sentinel Common Stock may dissent from the
Merger, and receive payment of the appraised value of his or her shares of
stock, provided the stockholder does not vote in favor of the Merger and
complies with certain statutory procedures set forth in Section 262 of the
Delaware General
4
<PAGE>
Corporation Law (the "DGCL"), the text of which is attached hereto as Appendix
III. The value determined in such appraisal could be more than, the same as, or
less than the value of the consideration to be received under the Merger
Agreement by holders of Sentinel Common Stock who do not dissent from the
Merger. A holder of Sentinel Common Stock who returns an executed proxy which
does not indicate either a vote against the Merger or an abstention will be
deemed to have voted in favor of the Merger and therefore will have waived his
or her appraisal rights. See "The Merger--Appraisal Rights" and Appendix III to
this Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
At the Closing, Roosevelt Bank will enter into an employment agreement (the
"Employment Agreement") with Craig D. Laemmli, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal, who will assume the position of Vice
President of Roosevelt Bank (for a six month term at an annual salary of
$61,559). If Mr. Laemmli's employment is terminated during the term of such
agreement for any reason, whether voluntarily by Mr. Laemmli or by Roosevelt
Bank (other than for cause, as defined in the Employment Agreement), he will be
entitled to receive payment of his salary for the remaining term of the
Employment Agreement, plus an amount of cash equal to 299 percent of his "base
amount" of compensation, in two installments, the first such installment
payable within 15 days after the date of termination and the second payable on
the first anniversary date of termination (the "Termination Payment"). It is
estimated that if paid, the amount of the Termination Payment would be
$162,644. The Sentinel Board was aware of this interest and others and
considered them, among other matters, in approving the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby. See "The Merger--Interests of Certain
Persons in the Merger."
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
The respective obligations of the parties to consummate the Merger are
subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions specified in the
Merger Agreement, including, among other things, the receipt of the requisite
regulatory and stockholder approvals, the accuracy of the representations and
warranties contained therein, the performance of all obligations imposed
thereby, the receipt by Roosevelt and Sentinel of an opinion with respect to
certain federal income tax consequences of the Merger and certain other
conditions. See "The Merger--Conditions to the Merger."
REGULATORY APPROVALS
The Merger is subject to the approval of the OTS. Roosevelt filed an
application for approval of the Merger with the OTS on May 13, 1996, and
received such approval on July 25, 1996.
It is a condition to the consummation of the Merger that all requisite
regulatory approvals be obtained without the imposition of any condition which
differs from conditions customarily imposed by the OTS in orders approving
acquisitions of the type contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The OTS approval
did not contain any such condition.
Under federal law a period of 15 days must expire following approval by the
OTS within which period the United States Department of Justice (the
"Department of Justice") may file objections to the Merger under the federal
antitrust laws. The Department of Justice did not file any objection during
this period. See "The Merger--Regulatory Approvals."
WAIVER AND AMENDMENT; TERMINATION
Prior to the Effective Time, the Boards of Directors of Roosevelt and
Sentinel may extend the time for performance of any obligations under the
Merger Agreement, waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties
contained in the Merger Agreement and waive compliance with any term, condition
or provision of the Merger Agreement.
5
<PAGE>
Subject to applicable law, the Merger Agreement may be amended by action of
the Roosevelt and Sentinel Boards at any time before or after approval of the
Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Sentinel, provided that, among other
things, after approval of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Sentinel,
no amendment may change the amount or form of the Merger Consideration to be
received by Sentinel stockholders in the Merger without their approval or
adversely affect the tax treatment to Sentinel stockholders of the Merger
Consideration. In addition, Roosevelt may cause an amendment to the Merger
Agreement to change the method of effecting the Merger, subject to certain
limitations set forth in the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective
Time, whether prior to or after approval of the matters presented herein by
Sentinel's stockholders, either by mutual consent of the parties in writing or
by either party if (i) the Merger is not consummated by January 31, 1997
(provided that the terminating party is not then in material breach of the
Merger Agreement); (ii) the required regulatory approvals are not obtained;
(iii) the required approval of Sentinel's stockholders is not obtained; or (iv)
the other party has materially breached any representation, warranty, covenant
or agreement set forth in the Merger Agreement and has failed to, or cannot,
cure in a timely manner such breach after receiving written notice of such
breach. In addition, the Sentinel Board may, in the exercise of its good faith
judgment in consultation with counsel, terminate the Agreement if it determines
that such termination is required by the occurrence of certain events;
provided, however, that such termination is permissible only upon the prior
payment to Roosevelt of a fee of $680,000 in cash. See "The Merger--Waiver and
Amendment; Termination." Sentinel has also agreed to pay Roosevelt this amount
in the event the Merger is not consummated and certain events occur by
September 22, 1997. See "The Merger--Expenses; Termination Fee."
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER
Each of Roosevelt and Sentinel has agreed to conduct its business prior to
the Effective Time only in the ordinary and usual course consistent with past
practices and use its best efforts to maintain and preserve its business
organization, employees and advantageous business relationships, and retain the
services of its officers and key employees. Sentinel also has agreed to certain
forbearances with respect to the conduct of its business prior to the Effective
Time. See "The Merger--Conduct of Business Pending the Merger."
EXPENSES; TERMINATION FEE
All expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the
consummation of the Merger are to be paid by the party incurring such expenses,
except that Roosevelt will pay all printing and mailing expenses and filing
fees associated with the Registration Statement and this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and all filings with the OTS for approval of the Merger
Agreement. In addition, Sentinel has agreed to pay Roosevelt a fee of $680,000
in the event the Merger is not consummated and certain events occur by
September 22, 1997. See "The Merger--Expenses; Termination Fee."
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
Roosevelt has not yet decided whether to account for the Merger under the
purchase method or the pooling of interests method. The decision will be based
on whether Roosevelt decides to issue shares in connection with the Merger from
authorized, but unissued shares, or to acquire shares in the open market for
issuance in connection with the Merger. If shares are acquired in the open
market, the pooling method will not be available. In addition, in order to
utilize the pooling method, Roosevelt would be required to, prior to
consummation of the Merger, rescind its existing stock repurchase plan, which
is described in Note 18 to the "Financial Statements of Roosevelt Financial
Group, Inc.--Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report
for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1994, and 1995." Under the purchase
method, which accounts for a business combination as the acquisition of one
enterprise by another, the value of the company's shares issued in the
transaction is included in stockholders' equity and any of such amount in
excess of net fair values of tangible
6
<PAGE>
and identifiable intangible assets of the acquired company is treated as an
intangible asset on the acquiring company's financial statements. Under the
pooling method, the financial statements of the combining enterprises are
combined as if the two were and had been a single entity and no intangible
asset is created. See "The Merger--Accounting Treatment."
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
Roosevelt has received an opinion of Silver, Freedman & Taff, L.L.P., counsel
to Roosevelt, in connection with the Registration statement to the effect that
if the Merger were consummated on the date hereof, the Merger would qualify as
a reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code") with the following consequences:
(i) the Company Merger and the Bank Merger would each qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code;
(ii) no gain or loss would be recognized by Roosevelt, Roosevelt Bank,
Sentinel or Sentinel Federal by reason of the Company Merger or the Bank
Merger;
(iii) no gain or loss would be recognized by any Sentinel stockholder
upon the exchange of Sentinel Common Stock solely for Roosevelt Common
Stock in the Merger (except in connection with the receipt of cash in lieu
of a fractional share of Roosevelt Common Stock or in connection with the
exercise of dissenter's rights, as discussed below);
(iv) the aggregate tax basis of the Roosevelt Common Stock received by
each stockholder of Sentinel who exchanged Sentinel Common Stock for
Roosevelt Common Stock in the Merger would be the same as the aggregate tax
basis of the Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor
(subject to any adjustments required as the result of receipt of cash in
lieu of a fractional share of Roosevelt Common Stock);
(v) the holding period of the shares of Roosevelt Common Stock received
by a Sentinel stockholder in the Merger would include the holding period of
the Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor (provided that
such shares of Sentinel Common Stock were held as a capital asset by such
stockholder at the Effective Time);
(vi) cash received in the Merger by a Sentinel stockholder in lieu of a
fractional share interest of Roosevelt Common Stock or by a Sentinel would
be treated as having been received as a distribution in full payment in
exchange for the fractional share interest of Roosevelt Common Stock which
such stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive, and would qualify
as capital gain or loss (assuming the Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in
exchange therefor were held as a capital asset by such stockholder at the
Effective Time); and
(vii) a Sentinel stockholder who received only cash as a result of the
exercise of appraisal rights would realize gain or loss for federal income
tax purposes (determined separately as to each block of Sentinel Common
stock exchanged) in an amount equal to the difference between (x) the
amount of cash received by such stockholder, and (y) such stockholder's tax
basis for the shares of Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in exchange
therefor, provided that the cash payment did not have the effect of
distribution of a dividend. Any such gain or loss would be recognized for
federal income tax purposes and would be treated as capital gain or loss.
However, if the cash payment did have the effect of the distribution of a
dividend, the amount of taxable income recognized generally would equal the
amount of cash received; such income generally would be taxable as a
dividend; and no loss (or the recovery of such stockholder's tax basis for
the shares of Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in the exchange) generally
would be recognized by such stockholder. The determination of whether a
cash payment has the effect of the distribution of a dividend would be made
pursuant to the provisions and limitations of Section 302 of the Code,
taking into account the constructive stock ownership rules of Section 318
of the Code.
7
<PAGE>
The opinion is subject to various assumptions and qualifications, including
that the Company Merger and the Bank Merger will be consummated in the manner
and in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement. However, the
financial accounting treatment of the transaction as a pooling or a purchase
will not impact the tax consequences described above. The opinion is based
entirely upon the Code, currently in effect or proposed thereunder, current
administrative rulings and practice and judicial authority, all of which are
subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Consummation of the Merger
is conditioned upon the receipt by Roosevelt and Sentinel of a closing tax
opinion setting forth the same tax consequences in the foregoing tax opinion.
See "--Conditions to the Merger." Sentinel stockholders are urged to consult
their tax advisors concerning the specific tax consequences to them of the
Merger, including the applicability and effect of various state, local and
foreign tax laws. For further discussion of the opinion of Silver, Freedman &
Taff, L.L.P. as to the material federal income tax consequences of the Merger,
as issued and delivered to the Board of Directors of Roosevelt (the "Roosevelt
Board"), see "The Merger--Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger."
EFFECTS OF THE MERGER ON RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS
As a result of the Merger, holders of Sentinel Common Stock who receive
shares of Roosevelt Common Stock in the Merger will become stockholders of
Roosevelt. For a comparison of the corporate charters and bylaws of Roosevelt
and Sentinel governing the rights of Roosevelt and Sentinel stockholders, see
"Comparison of Rights of Stockholders of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. and
Sentinel Financial Corporation."
NASDAQ LISTING
Roosevelt Common Stock (symbol: RFED) currently is quoted on the Nasdaq
National Market. It is a condition to consummation of the Merger that the
Roosevelt Common Stock to be issued to the stockholders of Sentinel in the
Merger and to be reserved for issuance under the Sentinel Stock Options assumed
by Roosevelt in the Merger also will be approved for listing on the Nasdaq
National Market. See "The Merger--Conditions to the Merger."
MANAGEMENT AFTER THE MERGER
As of the Effective Time, the Boards of Directors of Roosevelt and Roosevelt
Bank will consist of the current members of such Boards, and the executive
officers of Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank will include the current executive
officers of Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank. Craig D. Laemmli, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal, will assume the position of
Vice President of Roosevelt Bank pursuant to an employment agreement for a term
of six months as described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus. In
addition, for at least one year after the Effective Time, and for so long
thereafter as agreed to by Roosevelt Bank and the participating directors of
Sentinel, the directors of Sentinel who wish to do so may serve as regional
advisory directors of Roosevelt Bank, with a retainer fee for each such
advisory director of $500 per month. See also "The Merger--Interests of Certain
Persons in the Merger."
8
<PAGE>
COMPARATIVE STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
The Roosevelt Common Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol "RFED." At the present time, there is no established market in which
shares of Sentinel Common Stock are regularly traded, nor are there any
uniformly quoted prices for such shares. The last trade of shares of Sentinel
Common Stock known by management of Sentinel occurred during April 1996. The
closing bid price for Sentinel Common Stock on October 10, 1996 was $21.00 per
share, as reported by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. The following table
sets forth the market prices for Roosevelt Common Stock and the quarterly cash
dividends per share declared for Roosevelt Common Stock, for the periods
indicated. Sentinel has never paid dividends on its Common Stock. The market
prices of the Roosevelt Common Stock for the periods indicated represent
closing prices of such stock as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. Roosevelt
Common Stock prices and dividend amounts have been restated to give effect to
stock splits and stock dividends. The stock prices do not include retail mark-
ups, mark-downs or commissions.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ROOSEVELT COMMON STOCK
-----------------------
HIGH LOW DIVIDENDS
------ ------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1994 Calendar Year
First Quarter...................................... 15.833 13.917 0.10
Second Quarter..................................... 18.250 14.328 0.11
Third Quarter...................................... 17.375 16.000 0.11
Fourth Quarter..................................... 16.875 12.750 0.11
1995 Calendar Year
First Quarter...................................... 17.250 14.750 0.14
Second Quarter..................................... 18.625 15.750 0.14
Third Quarter...................................... 18.875 15.250 0.14
Fourth Quarter..................................... 19.375 15.875 0.14
1996 Calendar Year
First Quarter...................................... 19.250 17.000 0.155
Second Quarter..................................... 20.000 17.750 0.155
Third Quarter...................................... 18.875 15.625 0.155
Fourth Quarter (through October 10)................ 17.750 16.875 --
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth the last reported sale prices per share of
Roosevelt Common Stock and Sentinel Common Stock and the equivalent per share
price for Sentinel Common Stock giving effect to the Merger on (i) March 21,
1996, the last trading day preceding public announcement of the signing of the
Merger Agreement; and (ii) October 10, 1996, the last practicable date prior to
the mailing of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ROOSEVELT SENTINEL EQUIVALENT PRICE PER
COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK SENTINEL SHARE(1)
------------ ------------ --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
March 21, 1996................... $18.500 n/a(2) $26.327
October 10, 1996................. 17.750 n/a(2) 25.260
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) The equivalent price per share of Sentinel Common Stock at each specified
date was determined by multiplying (i) the last reported sale price of
Roosevelt Common Stock on such date and (ii) the Exchange Ratio of 1.4231.
(2) The last trade of shares of Sentinel Common Stock known by management of
Sentinel occurred during April 1996. The closing bid price for Sentinel
Common Stock on October 10, 1996 was $21.00 per share as reported by the
National Quotation Bureau, Inc.
9
<PAGE>
As of October 10, 1996, the 42,157,516 outstanding shares of Roosevelt Common
Stock were held by approximately 5,189 record owners and the 513,423
outstanding shares of Sentinel Common Stock by approximately 251 record owners.
The issuance of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock in connection with the
Merger will not affect the amount of, and will have an immaterial effect on the
percentage of, shares of Roosevelt Common Stock held by any current Roosevelt
shareholders, including 5% shareholders and Roosevelt directors and officers.
The number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock to be received for each share
of Sentinel Common Stock has been fixed at 1.4231. The Exchange Ratio is
subject to adjustment, such that if the weighted average sale price of all
Roosevelt Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq National Market during the ten
trading day period ending on the date that is three trading days prior to the
Closing Date of the Merger (the "Average Pre-Closing Trading Price") is less
than $15.83 per share, the Exchange Ratio shall be equal to $22.525 divided by
the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in which case a greater number of shares
of Roosevelt Common Stock would be issued than if there were no adjustment to
the Exchange Ratio), and if the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price is greater
than $21.42 per share, the Exchange Ratio shall be equal to $30.475 divided by
the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in which case fewer shares of Roosevelt
Common Stock would be issued than if there were no adjustment to the Exchange
Ratio). The market price of Roosevelt Common Stock may fluctuate between the
date of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the Effective Time. Fluctuations in
the market price of Roosevelt Common Stock would generally result in an
increase or decrease in the value of the Merger Consideration to be received by
holders of Sentinel Common Stock in the Merger. An increase in the market value
of Roosevelt Common Stock would generally increase the market value of the
Merger Consideration to be received in the Merger. A decrease in the market
value of Roosevelt Common Stock would generally have the opposite effect. The
market value of the Merger Consideration at the time of the Merger will depend
upon the market value of a share of Roosevelt Common Stock at such time. See
"The Merger--Merger Consideration." Sentinel stockholders are urged to obtain
current market quotations for Roosevelt Common Stock.
The timing and amount of the future dividends of Roosevelt will depend upon
earnings, cash requirements, Roosevelt's financial condition and other factors
deemed relevant by the Roosevelt Board. Dividends may also be limited by
certain regulatory restrictions.
10
<PAGE>
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
RECENT LEGISLATION
The deposits of Roosevelt Bank are presently insured by the Savings
Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF") which together with the Bank Insurance
Fund (the "BIF") are the two insurance funds administered by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"). As a result of the BIF reaching
its statutory reserve ratio, the FDIC revised the premium schedule for BIF
insured institutions to provide a range of .04% to .31% of deposits. The
revisions became effective in the third quarter of 1995. The BIF premium
schedule was further revised, effective January 1996, to provide a range of 0%
to .27%, essentially eliminating deposit insurance premiums for many BIF-
insured institutions. As a result of these adjustments, BIF insured
institutions now generally pay lower premiums than SAIF insured institutions.
At the time the FDIC revised the BIF premium schedule, it noted that, absent
legislative action (as discussed below), the SAIF would not attain its
designated reserve ratio until the year 2002. As a result, SAIF insured
members would continue to be generally subject to higher deposit insurance
premiums than BIF insured institutions until, all things being equal, the SAIF
attains its required reserve ratio.
In order to help eliminate this disparity and any competitive disadvantage
between BIF and SAIF member institutions with respect to deposit insurance
premiums, legislation to recapitalize the SAIF was enacted in September 1996.
The legislation provides for a one-time assessment to be imposed on all
deposits assessed at the SAIF rates, as of March 31, 1995, in order to
recapitalize the SAIF. It also provides for the merger of the BIF and the SAIF
on January 1, 1999 if no savings associations then exist. The FDIC has
announced that the special assessment rate is anticipated to be .657% and the
assessment will be payable by November 27, 1996. Based on Roosevelt Bank's
level of SAIF deposits at March 31, 1995 (including the effect of the
acquisitions of Kirksville Federal Savings Bank ("Kirksville Bank") and
Washington Savings Bank, FSB ("Washington Savings"), Roosevelt Bank's
assessment would be approximately $27.4 million on a pre-tax basis. If such
special assessment had been recorded as of June 30, 1996, on a pro forma
basis, the tangible, core and risk-based capital ratios would have been 5.33%,
5.35% and 13.76%, respectively. Accordingly, this special assessment will
significantly increase noninterest expense and adversely affect Roosevelt
Bank's results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
Prior to the enactment of the legislation, a portion of the SAIF assessment
imposed on savings associations was used to repay obligations issued by a
federally chartered corporation to provide financing ("FICO") for resolving
the thrift crisis in the 1980s. Although the FDIC has proposed that the SAIF
assessment be equalized with the BIF assessment schedule, effective October 1,
1996, SAIF-insured institutions will continue to be subject to a FICO
assessment as a result of this continuing obligation. Although the legislation
also now requires assessments to be made on BIF-assessable deposits for this
purpose, effective January 1, 1997, that assessment will be limited to 20% of
the rate imposed on SAIF assessable deposits until the earlier of December 31,
1999 or when no savings association continues to exist, thereby imposing a
greater burden on SAIF member institutions such as Roosevelt Bank. Thereafter,
however, assessments on BIF-member institutions will be made on the same basis
as SAIF-member institutions. The rates to be established by the FDIC to
implement this requirement for all FDIC-insured institutions is uncertain at
this time.
The United States Congress has also considered legislation that would
require all Federal thrift institutions, such as Roosevelt Bank, to either
convert to a national bank or a state chartered financial institution. If such
legislation were enacted, Roosevelt would no longer be regulated as a thrift
holding company, but rather as a bank holding company. The OTS would be
abolished and its functions transferred among the other federal banking
regulators. No assurance can be given as to whether or in what form the
legislation will be enacted or its effect on Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank.
In August 1996, legislation was enacted that repeals the reserve method of
accounting (including the percentage of taxable income method) used by many
thrifts to calculate their bad debt reserve for federal income tax purposes.
As a result, large thrifts such as Roosevelt Bank must recapture that portion
of the reserve that
11
<PAGE>
exceeds the amount that could have been taken under the specific charge-off
method for post-1987 tax years. The legislation also requires thrifts to
account for bad debts for federal income tax purposes on the same basis as
commercial banks for tax years beginning after December 31, 1995. The
recapture will occur over a six-year period, the commencement of which will be
delayed until the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 1997,
provided the institution meets certain residential lending requirements. The
management of Roosevelt does not believe that the legislation will have a
material impact on Roosevelt or Roosevelt Bank.
AMENDMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During August 1996, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Staff") performed a regular review of Roosevelt's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995 (the "1995 Form 10-K") in conjunction
with Registration Statements on Form S-4 filed by the Company related to the
Merger and the planned acquisitions of Mutual Bancompany, Inc. ("Mutual") and
Community Charter Corporation ("CCC").
As a result of this review, the Staff questioned the Company's original
accounting treatment surrounding the deferral and recognition of gains and
losses on financial futures contracts used to reduce the interest rate risk of
certain mortgage-backed securities in the Company's available for sale
portfolio. The Company originally recognized a $34.8 million charge to fourth
quarter 1995 earnings regarding the cessation of deferral accounting.
At issue was the Staff's contention that the financial futures contracts did
not meet the "high correlation" criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 80, Accounting for Futures Contracts, thus not qualifying for
deferral accounting from the inception of the hedge in March 1994 and
requiring the recognition of subsequent gains and losses in income. The
Company originally ceased deferral accounting when management concluded that
high correlation measured using the "cumulative dollar approach" was unlikely
to be achieved on a consistent basis.
Accordingly, at the Staff's request, the Company has restated its 1994 and
1995 consolidated financial statements to reflect the cessation of deferral
accounting, from the inception of the hedge, with respect to the
aforementioned financial futures contracts. The restatement had the effect of
increasing previously reported net income for the year ended December 31, 1994
and decreasing previously reported net income for the year ended December 31,
1995 by $18.0 million (on a fully-diluted per share basis an increase of $0.48
for 1994 and a decrease of $0.43 for 1995) for the period. This restatement is
one of the timing of recognition of gains and losses in the Statement of
Operations and has no impact on total stockholders' equity at any date since
both the futures contracts and the related mortgage-backed securities have
been previously marked to market through stockholders' equity at each
reporting period. Other appropriate conforming changes to reflect the
statement have been made throughout this Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
Subsequent to December 31, 1995, the Company terminated all of its futures
positions and maintained its interest rate risk management position by
principally redesigning existing interest rate exchange agreements to the
available for sale portfolio. Such interest rate exchange agreements were
utilized prior to the redesignation to manage the interest rate risk of
interest-bearing deposits and other short-term borrowings.
NEW PURCHASE OF MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
The Company recently agreed to acquire approximately $750 million of
mortgage servicing rights. The purchase is expected to settle prior to
December 31, 1996. The purchase is expected to expand the servicing portfolio
by approximately 10%. The Company anticipates that as of December 31, 1996 the
Company will be servicing more than $8 billion of mortgages and over 110,000
loans.
THE COMPANY STUDIES BALANCE SHEET RESTRUCTURING
The Company is currently studying a number of possible transactions to
accelerate the benefit to shareholders from the transition to a retail banking
operation. Such transactions being considered include, but
12
<PAGE>
are not limited to, share repurchases, reduction in the mortgage-backed
securities portfolio and pay downs of outside borrowings. Such transactions,
if or when completed, are not expected to have a material impact on core
profitability during the remainder of 1996.
Consistent with these efforts, the Company completed the early retirement of
$28.75 million of 9.5% subordinated debentures on August 1, 1996. Much of the
benefit to regulatory capital from having issued such debentures would have
been greatly diminished when the Company becomes a commercial bank holding
company later this year. See "Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. and Roosevelt
Bank--Bank Holding Company Regulation." Repaying such high cost outside
borrowings is consistent with the Company's strategic transition to a retail
orientation and to efforts to simplify its balance sheet while also improving
its net interest margin.
Similarly, the Company has defeased of all of its remaining previously
issued 10.125% mortgage-backed bonds. The bonds were originally scheduled to
mature during 2018. However, at issuance, the Company reserved its right to
retire the bonds at face value during 1998. The relatively near term call date
made this transaction an effective step in reducing high cost outside
borrowings in support of the Company's retail transition.
EARLY RESULTS REGARDING CREDIT CARD INITIATIVE
The Company's initiative regarding credit cards began to show results during
July and August 1996. During the period, the Company issued 72,469 cards,
which carried $28 million in balances at August 31, 1996. Credit cards are one
aspect of the Company's strategic initiatives to convert the balance sheet to
a more retail orientation with more whole loans, consumer loans and checking
accounts as well as generally fewer mortgage-backed securities and outside
borrowings.
The Company believes that such a shift in the balance sheet can be
accomplished without a meaningful change to its high asset quality position.
The Company believes that credit scoring techniques will help it maintain
overall quality on the credit cards. Based upon a review of recent industry
data, the Company believes the minimum score for a typical credit card program
during recent periods ranged from 640 to 660 on an 800 point Fair Isaac and
Company, Inc. scale, with 800 being the highest quality. The goal of the
Company is to develop a credit card portfolio with an average score of 720.
Based upon balances outstanding, Roosevelt's newest card holders have an
average score of 729. Based upon the average credit limit, those customers
have an average score of 745.
ROOSEVELT'S CAUTION REGARDING NEAR-TERM EXPECTATIONS
The widespread use of introductory rates on loans, including credit cards,
will limit near term earnings benefits of Roosevelt, while creating earnings
momentum for 1997. The retail initiatives of the Company will require
additional increases in expenses which may offset much of the near term
earnings benefit of the retail activities. However, such activities are
expected to further build the earnings momentum for 1997 and 1998 as the
various retail assets reprice up after their introductory periods and future
growth in fee income outpaces a more normalized growth in expenses.
BROAD BASED GROWTH IN ROOSEVELT'S RETAIL FRANCHISE CONTINUES
Retail activities for July and August suggest that growth in the scale and
quality of the overall retail franchise continues. Mortgage and consumer loan
production totalled $196 million and $38 million respectively, up sharply from
1995 levels. The Company also continues to convert the majority of its
mortgage customers into full service retail clients with checking accounts and
other financial service relationships.
The Company also opened 22,735 new checking accounts during July and August
1996, which is expected to result in a new quarterly record in net checking
account growth. The quality of the new accounts is underscored by an average
balance per account for the non-interest bearing portion of the retail
portfolio of $1,073 at August 31, 1996.
13
<PAGE>
The Company also anticipates growth in the areas of retail banking fees and
insurance and brokerage commissions.
Progress in the many retail areas has been a function of intensive training,
management focus and implementation of new management tools. Such progress can
best be measured in terms of sales per selling FTE (full time equivalent) per
day. For August 1996, sales topped ten per FTE per day, up from approximately
seven during the second quarter of 1996 and up from less than three per day at
the beginning of 1996. The Company's goal by year-end 1996 is to be operating
above 11 sales per selling FTE per day.
PENDING ACQUISITIONS OF MUTUAL AND COMMUNITY CHARTER
On April 9, 1996, Roosevelt entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to
which Mutual, Jefferson City, Missouri, the holding company for Mutual Bank,
will merge with and into Roosevelt, and Mutual Bank will merge with Roosevelt
Bank. Upon the consummation of the transactions, each Mutual stockholder will
become entitled to receive a number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock equal
to the quotient of (A) $23.00 divided by (B) the weighted average sale price
of all Roosevelt Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq National Market during the
ten trading days ending on the date that is three trading days prior to the
closing date of the transaction. As of March 31, 1996, Mutual had total
consolidated assets of $53 million, deposits of $46 million and stockholders'
equity of $6 million. Roosevelt filed an application with the OTS for approval
of the Mutual acquisition in May 1996, and received such approval in July
1996. Mutual commenced its solicitation of Mutual shareholders for approval of
the acquisition on September 24, 1996. Roosevelt anticipates that the
acquisition will close in the middle of the fourth quarter of 1996.
On April 16, 1996, Roosevelt entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to
which CCC, St. Louis, Missouri, the holding company for Missouri State Bank,
will be merged with Roosevelt, resulting in Missouri State Bank becoming a
stand-alone first tier subsidiary of Roosevelt. Upon the consummation of the
merger, each CCC stockholder will become entitled to receive 1.6 shares of
Roosevelt Common Stock. As of June 30, 1996, CCC had total consolidated assets
of $64.7 million, deposits of $56.8 million and stockholders' equity of $5.8
million. Roosevelt filed an application with the Missouri Division of Finance
(the "MDF") in June 1996 and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (the "FRB") in July 1996 for approval of the acquisition of Missouri
State Bank and received the approval of the MDF in July 1996 and the FRB in
August 1996. CCC commenced its solicitation of CCC shareholders for approval
of the acquisition on September 20, 1996. Roosevelt anticipates that the CCC
acquisition will close in the middle of the fourth quarter of 1996.
14
<PAGE>
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP,
INC.
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, certain summary
historical data for Roosevelt. Information at and for the years ended December
31, 1991 through 1993 have been restated to reflect an acquisition accounted
for as a pooling of interests. This information is derived in part from, and
should be read in conjunction with, the separate consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in "Financial Statements of Roosevelt
Financial Group, Inc."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT OR FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30,
-------------------------
1996 1995
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Summary of Financial Condition:
Total assets...................................... $ 9,327,772 $ 8,961,061
Securities available for sale..................... 1,353,760 1,726,044
Securities held to maturity....................... 3,534,341 3,641,954
Loans............................................. 4,016,699 3,264,735
Deposits.......................................... 4,995,371 4,785,619
Other borrowings.................................. 3,653,183 3,565,862
Stockholders' equity.............................. 516,317 452,350
Summary of Operations:
Total interest income............................. $ 328,423 $ 319,218
Total interest expense............................ 238,753 225,016
Provision for losses on loans..................... 600 600
------------ ------------
Net interest income after provision for losses on
loans............................................ 89,070 93,602
------------ ------------
Retail banking fees............................... 6,587 5,228
Insurance and brokerage sales commissions......... 3,718 4,116
Loan servicing fees (expenses), net............... 4,733 4,144
Net gain (loss) from financial instruments........ 862 (55,739)
Unrealized losses on impairment of mortgage-backed
securities held to maturity...................... -- (27,063)
Other............................................. 2,894 1,538
------------ ------------
Total noninterest income (loss)................. 18,794 (67,776)
------------ ------------
Total noninterest expense....................... 45,146 43,233
------------ ------------
Income before income tax expense, extraordinary
item, and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle............................. 62,718 (17,613)
Income tax expense (benefit)...................... 21,425 (7,298)
Extraordinary item, net........................... -- --
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle........................................ -- --
------------ ------------
Net income (loss)................................. $ 41,293 $ (10,315)
============ ============
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock.... $ 39,174 $ (12,444)
============ ============
Per Share Data:
Primary earnings per share:
Income (loss) before extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle $ 0.92 $ (0.31)
Extraordinary item................................ -- --
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles....................................... -- --
------------ ------------
Net income (loss)................................. $ 0.92 $ (0.31)
============ ============
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT OR FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Summary of Financial
Condition:
Total assets.............. $9,013,061 $8,431,866 $7,595,161 $6,038,732 $5,756,199
Securities available for
sale..................... 1,606,461 1,765,699 1,665,879 52,399 46,997
Securities held to
maturity................. 3,550,140 3,276,062 2,642,916 2,219,147 2,487,141
Loans..................... 3,577,892 3,072,151 2,671,810 2,349,771 2,259,867
Deposits.................. 4,907,497 4,899,389 5,081,496 4,300,981 4,184,323
Other borrowings.......... 3,507,475 2,963,449 1,975,661 1,319,154 1,222,457
Stockholders' equity...... 496,906 441,626 378,462 288,545 254,396
Summary of Operations:
Total interest income..... $ 647,316 $ 533,368 $ 486,940 $ 439,173 $ 503,801
Total interest expense.... 466,433 347,574 321,490 314,728 394,315
Provision for losses on
loans.................... 1,200 12,432 706 2,648 2,695
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net interest income after
provision for losses on
loans.................... 180,162 173,280 164,744 121,797 106,791
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Retail banking fees....... 10,706 8,682 6,260 4,870 3,150
Insurance and brokerage
sales commissions........ 7,506 6,538 5,737 4,347 3,159
Loan servicing fees
(expenses), net.......... 8,911 7,359 (11,145) 8,392 11,191
Net gain (loss) from
financial instruments.... (58,216) (10,660) 10,646 11,394 374
Unrealized losses on
impairment of mortgage-
backed securities held
to maturity.............. (27,063) -- -- -- --
Other..................... 3,016 5,337 2,759 1,790 5,337
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total noninterest income
(loss)................. (55,140) (17,256) 14,257 30,793 23,211
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total noninterest
expense................ 87,666 115,576 98,598 100,452 87,994
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income before income tax
expense, extraordinary
item, and cumulative
effect of change in
accounting principle..... 37,356 74,960 80,403 52,138 42,008
Income tax expense
(benefit)................ 10,258 25,384 27,134 17,887 14,612
Extraordinary item, net... -- (7,849) (1,908) (3,796) (1,662)
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle................ -- -- (6,489)(1) -- (16,321)(2)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss)......... $ 27,098 $ 41,727 $ 44,872 $ 30,455 $ 9,413
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) to
common stock............. $ 22,855 $ 36,543 $ 41,057 $ 28,866 $ 5,029
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Per Share Data:
Primary earnings per share
Income (loss) before
extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle................ $ .56 $ 1.17 $ 1.54 $ 1.09 $ 1.09
Extraordinary item........ -- (0.21) (0.06) (0.13) (0.06)
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principles............... -- -- (0.20) -- (0.65)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss)......... $ .56 $ 0.96 $ 1.28 $ 0.96 $ 0.38
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
16
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT OR FOR THE
SIX MONTHS AT OR FOR THE
ENDED JUNE 30, YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------- ---------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fully-diluted earnings
per share:
Income (loss) before
extraordinary item
and cumulative effect
of change in
accounting
principles............ $ 0.88 $ (0.31) $ 0.56 $ 1.17 $ 1.32 $ 0.99 $ 1.09
Extraordinary item..... -- -- -- (0.21) (0.05) (0.11) (0.06)
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principles............ -- -- -- -- (0.16) -- (0.65)
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ -------
Net income (loss).... $ 0.88 $ (0.31) $ 0.56 $ 0.96 $ 1.11 $ 0.88 $ 0.38
======= ======= ====== ====== ====== ====== =======
Pro Forma amount
assuming the change in
accounting principle is
applied
retroactively:(2)
Net income........... N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $25,734
======= ======= ====== ====== ====== ====== =======
Earnings per share... N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 1.03
======= ======= ====== ====== ====== ====== =======
Other Data:
Ratio of net interest
income to general and
administrative
expense............... 1.99x 2.17x 2.07x(4) 1.67x(3) 1.82x 1.55x 1.44x
Effective net spread
during the period..... 2.00% 2.14% 2.06% 2.29% 2.40% 2.32% 2.01%
Nonperforming assets
to total assets, end
of period............. 0.85% 0.75% 0.90 0.41 0.46 0.78 0.89
Return on assets
(ratio of net income
to average total
assets)............... 0.88% (0.23)(5) 0.30 (4) 0.49 (3) 0.61 0.54 0.16
Return on equity
(ratio of net income
to average
stockholders'
equity)............... 16.27% (4.61)(5) 5.97 (4) 10.30 (3) 12.86 11.11 3.55
Equity-to-assets ratio
(ratio of average
stockholders' equity
to average total
assets)............... 5.42% 4.91% 4.97 4.80 4.75 4.84 4.64
Cash dividends per
share of common
stock................. $ 0.31 $ 0.28 $ 0.56 $ 0.43 $ 0.31 $ 0.21 $ 0.20
Dividends on common
stock payout ratio
(dividends paid per
share of common stock
divided by primary
net income per
share)................ 33.70% N/M (5) 100.00%(4) 44.79%(3) 18.72% 18.63% 90.41%
Book value per share,
end of period......... $ 10.98 $ 10.01 $10.60 $ 9.79 $ 9.18 $ 9.29 $ 8.67
</TABLE>
- -------
(1) During December 1993, Roosevelt adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," on a prospective basis. As a
result, Roosevelt recorded a $6.5 million charge, net of applicable income
taxes, as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle to
reflect an other than temporary impairment of certain interest-only
stripped coupon mortgage-backed pass-through certificates and
collateralized mortgage obligation residual interests. See Note 2 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included "Financial Statements
of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.--Consolidated Financial Statements and
Independent auditor's Report for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1994
and 1995.
(2) During 1991, Roosevelt changed its method of amortizing cost in excess of
fair value of net assets acquired. Prior to 1991, Roosevelt amortized the
cost in excess of fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) on a
straight line basis over a 15 year life. On January 1, 1991, Roosevelt
adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
72, "Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking and Thrift
Institutions" (SFAS 72) and amortizes goodwill over the life of the long-
term interest-bearing assets acquired. Such adoption was allowed as a
result of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task
Force Consensus No. 89-19 which permitted retroactive application for
purchase business combinations that occurred prior to the issuance of SFAS
72. Roosevelt recorded a $16.3 million cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle in 1991.
(3) Includes a $57.3 million net expense (net of income tax benefit) of
merger-related expenses as a result of the acquisition of Farm & Home.
Such merger-related expenses included $11.4 million in provision for
losses on loans, $38.4 million of net loss from financial instruments,
$3.7 million in provision for real estate losses, $6.3 million in
compensation and employee benefits, occupancy expense of $5.9 million,
transaction related fees of $7.0 million, and $1.8 million of other
expenses. This amount was reduced by the income tax effect of $25.0
million. An extraordinary item totalling $7.8 million was recorded related
to the early extinguishment of debt. Also included are gains resulting
from the mark to market of Roosevelt's financial futures positions used to
reduce the interest rate risk of certain mortgage backed securities in the
available for sale portfolio totaling $39.5 million ($25.1 million, net of
income taxes). Not including the aforementioned charges and gains for
1994, the ratio of net interest income to general and administrative
expense would have been 2.08x, return on assets would have been 0.96%,
return on equity would have been 20.01%, and the dividend on common stock
payout ratio would have been 18.40%.
(4) Excluding the impact of the impairment charge related to certain mortgage-
backed securities of $27.1 million, losses resulting, from the mark to
market of Roosevelt's financial futures position used to reduce the
interest rate risk of certain mortgage-backed securities in the available
for sale portfolio totaling $71.0 million and merger-related expenses of
$1.6 million, the ratio of net interest income to general and
administrative expense would have been 2.11x, return on assets would have
been 0.95%, return on equity would have been 18.96% and the dividend on
common stock payout ratio would have been 27.59%.
(5) Excluding the impact of the impairment charges related to certain
mortgage-backed securities of $27.1 million, and losses resulting from the
mark to market of Roosevelt's financial futures positions used to reduce
the interest rate risk of certain mortgage-backed securities in the
available for sale portfolio totaling $61.7 million, return on assets
would have been 0.98%, return on equity would have been 19.94% and the
dividend on common stock payout ratio would have been 26.92%.
17
<PAGE>
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, certain summary
historical data for Sentinel. This information is derived in part from, and
should be read in conjunction with, the separate consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus. See "Financial Statements of Sentinel Financial
Corporation."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30,
-------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Selected Financial
Condition Data:
Total assets........... $ 143,842 $ 161,914 $ 154,560 $ 156,600 $ 161,054
Loans receivable,
net................... 82,693 80,956 72,278 80,043 95,529
Mortgage-backed
securities, net....... 51,520 68,941 73,096 60,725 31,982
Investment
securities............ 4,619 6,246 4,322 10,924 15,574
Securities and loans
available for sale.... 1,577 1,856 1,058 1,090 13,319
Savings deposits....... 123,253 126,440 131,504 138,585 144,685
Advances from Federal
Home Loan Bank........ 7,000 21,850 10,450 10,000 9,500
Stockholders'
equity/retained
earnings--
substantially
restricted............ 11,668 10,615 9,904 5,106 4,254
Selected Operations
Data:
Total interest and
dividend income....... $ 11,004 $ 10,422 $ 9,418 $ 10,793 $ 12,953
Total interest
expense............... 7,527 7,344 6,948 7,740 9,733
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net interest income.. 3,477 3,078 2,638 3,053 3,220
Provision for losses
on loans.............. -- -- 42 154 27
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net interest income
after provision for
losses on loans..... 3,477 3,078 2,596 2,899 3,193
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Service fee income..... 126 124 147 156 157
Gain on sale of
securities and loans,
net................... 129 30 35 275 124
Other noninterest
income................ 232 256 267 433 173
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total noninterest
income.............. 487 410 449 864 454
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
General and
administrative
expenses.............. 3,351 2,602 2,549 2,418 2,511
Provision for losses
on real estate
acquired through
foreclosure........... -- -- (43) 24 37
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before income
taxes and cumulative
effect of change in
accounting
principle........... 613 886 418 1,345 1,135
Income taxes........... (315) 283 45 548 426
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before
cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle........... 928 603 373 797 709
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle............. -- 27 191 55 49
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income........... $ 928 $ 630 $ 564 852 $ 758
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Earnings per share:
Income before
extraordinary item
and cumulative effect
of change in
accounting
principle............. $ 1.81 $ 1.25 $ 0.52(1) N/A N/A
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle............. -- 0.06 -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income........... $ 1.81 $ 1.31 $ 0.52(1) N/A N/A
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Other Data:
Average total assets.... $ 153,342 157,875 $ 155,206 $ 157,595 $ 159,404
Average total liabili-
ties................... 142,200 147,616 147,701 152,804 155,482
Interest rate spread in-
formation:
Average during year.... 1.81% 1.61% 1.33% 1.75% 1.89%
End of year............ 2.07 1.59 1.49 1.70 2.20
Net interest margin..... 2.28 1.98 1.61 1.97 2.06
Average interest-earning
assets to average in-
terest-bearing liabili-
ties................... 109.66 107.67 106.21 104.33 102.69
Nonperforming assets to
total assets at end of
year................... 0.12 0.08 0.18 0.39 0.92
Equity to total assets
at end of year......... 7.73 6.56 6.41 3.26 2.64
Return on assets (ratio
of net income to aver-
age total assets)...... 0.61 0.40 0.36 0.54 0.48
Return on equity (ratio
of net income to aver-
age equity)............ 8.33 6.14 7.51 17.78 19.33
Equity-to-assets ratio
(ratio of average eq-
uity to average total
assets)................ 7.27 6.50 4.84 3.04 2.46
General and administra-
tive expenses as a per-
cent of average total
assets................. 2.19 1.65 1.72 1.53 1.58
Ratio of net interest
income to general and
administrative ex-
penses................. 1.04 0.85 1.01 0.79 0.78
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) From January 7, 1994, the date of completion of the conversion of Sentinel
Federal from mutual to stock form of ownership.
18
<PAGE>
COMPARATIVE UNAUDITED PER SHARE DATA
The following table shows unaudited comparative per share data for Roosevelt
and Sentinel Common Stock on a historical basis, and on a pro forma combined
basis and a pro forma equivalent basis for Roosevelt and Sentinel giving
effect to the Merger accounted for under the pooling of interests method of
accounting. Roosevelt has not yet decided whether to account for the Merger
under the pooling of interests method or the purchase method of accounting.
The pro forma data under the pooling and purchase methods of accounting would
not be materially different. See "The Merger--Accounting Treatment."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HISTORICAL PRO FORMA
--------------------- ---------------------
EQUIVALENT
ROOSEVELT SENTINEL(1) COMBINED SHARES
--------- ----------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Book value per share at:
December 31, 1995............. $10.60 $20.68(2) $10.66(3) $15.17(4)
June 30, 1996................. 10.98 22.73 11.06(3) 15.74(4)
Cash dividends declared per
share:
Year Ended December 31, 1993.. 0.310 -- 0.310 0.441
Year Ended December 31, 1994.. 0.430 -- 0.430 0.612
Year Ended December 31, 1995.. 0.560 -- 0.560 0.797
Six Months Ended June 30,
1996......................... 0.310 -- 0.310 0.441
Income per share before
extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles:
Year Ended December 31, 1993.. 1.32 N/A 1.32 1.88(5)
Year Ended December 31, 1994.. 1.17 0.52(2) 1.17 1.67(5)
Year Ended December 31, 1995.. 0.56 1.31(2) 0.57 0.81(5)
Six Months Ended June 30,
1996......................... 0.88 1.16 0.87 1.24(5)
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Sentinel completed its initial public offering on January 7, 1994. As a
result, income per share before extraordinary items and cumulative effect
of change in accounting principles prior to such date is not applicable.
(2) In the case of Sentinel, the information presented at or for the year
ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 is at or for its fiscal year ended June
30, 1995 and 1994.
(3) Based on the combined stockholders' equity of Roosevelt and Sentinel,
including the effect of pro forma adjustments. The adjusted stockholders'
equity amounts are divided by the number of shares of Roosevelt Common
Stock outstanding at December 31, 1995 and June 30, 1996, respectively,
plus the product of the number of shares of Sentinel Common Stock
outstanding at June 30, 1995 and June 30, 1996, respectively, and the
Exchange Ratio. The number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock outstanding
at December 31, 1995 and June 30, 1996 includes 4,878,750 common stock
equivalents attributable to 1,301,000 shares of Roosevelt's 6 1/2% non-
cumulative convertible preferred stock outstanding as of such dates.
(4) Based on the pro forma combined book value per share amounts of Roosevelt
and Sentinel, respectively, multiplied by the Exchange Ratio.
(5) Based on the pro forma combined net income per share amounts before
extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles of Roosevelt and Sentinel, respectively, multiplied by the
Exchange Ratio.
19
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND ROOSEVELT BANK
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
General. Roosevelt is a Delaware corporation organized in 1988 to be the
thrift holding company for Roosevelt Bank. The principal asset of Roosevelt is
the outstanding stock of Roosevelt Bank. As of June 30, 1996, Roosevelt had
total consolidated assets of $9.3 billion, deposits of $5.0 billion and
stockholders' equity of $516 million. The executive offices of Roosevelt are
located at 900 Roosevelt Parkway, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017 and the
telephone number at that address is (314) 532-6200.
Roosevelt's business consists primarily of attracting deposits from the
general public and using those deposits, together with borrowings and other
funds, to originate and acquire real estate and consumer loans to acquire
mortgage-backed securities, to perform loan servicing functions for others and
to provide other retail banking and financial services to consumers. The
principal elements of Roosevelt's business plan are (i) the origination of a
higher percentage of its assets; (ii) the diversification of its balance sheet
away from only mortgage and real estate related assets; (iii) the expansion of
its retail deposit base with a simultaneous shift within that deposit base
toward checking and transaction accounts; and (iv) growth in fee income by
providing other services such as insurance, brokerage and mortgage loan
servicing for other investors. See also "Business of Roosevelt Financial
Group, Inc."
Acquisitions. Since the beginning of 1990, Roosevelt has pursued a program
of acquiring other in-market and adjacent-market thrift institutions.
Roosevelt expects to continue informal discussions with various financial
institutions regarding their acquisition by Roosevelt.
In 1990, Roosevelt expanded its franchise to the Illinois portion of the St.
Louis metropolitan area by acquiring Home Federal Savings, Alton, Illinois,
through the merger conversion acquisition of Home Federal Savings, which had
$110 million in assets and $104 million in savings deposits. In October 1991,
Roosevelt completed the merger conversion acquisition of Hannibal Mutual Loan
and Building Association, Hannibal, Missouri, which had $18 million in assets
and savings deposits. In November 1992, Roosevelt completed the merger
conversion acquisitions of Conservative Bank, FSB, St. Louis, Missouri, which
had $65 million in assets and $61 million in savings deposits, and First
Granite City Savings and Loan, Granite City, Illinois, which had $49 million
in assets and $42 million in savings deposits. In December 1992, Roosevelt
entered the Kansas City, Missouri market by completing the purchase of
Brookside Savings Bank, FSB, which had $219 million in assets and $146 million
in savings deposits.
In June 1993, Roosevelt completed the acquisition of the Missouri retail
banking network of First Nationwide Bank of San Francisco, California.
Roosevelt received net cash totaling $588 million. Gross proceeds totaled $595
million, which represented the amount of deposit accounts acquired by
Roosevelt Bank and accrued but unpaid interest on such accounts. This amount
was reduced by $7 million, which was paid by Roosevelt Bank for the
acquisition of certain loans and a tax deductible intangible asset related to
the deposit accounts.
In November 1993, Roosevelt completed the acquisition of the 17 eastern
Missouri retail banking branches of Home Savings of America, Los Angeles,
California. The transaction was structured as a purchase of deposits and
related branch locations and equipment. Roosevelt received net cash of $709
million. Gross proceeds totaled $733 million, which represented the amount of
deposit accounts acquired by Roosevelt and accrued but unpaid interest on such
accounts. This amount was reduced by $24 million, which was paid by Roosevelt
for the acquisition of certain loans and a tax deductible intangible asset
related to the deposit accounts.
On April 22, 1994, Roosevelt completed the acquisition of Home Federal
Bancorp of Missouri, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, which had total consolidated
assets of $533 million and savings deposits of $467 million.
On June 30, 1994, Farm & Home Financial Corporation ("Farm & Home"), Nevada,
Missouri, with total consolidated assets of $3.1 billion and savings deposits
of $2.1 billion, merged with and into Roosevelt and Farm
20
<PAGE>
& Home Savings Association, a Missouri chartered stock savings and loan
association and wholly owned subsidiary of Farm & Home, merged with and into
Roosevelt Bank. The transaction was accounted for as a pooling of interests
and, accordingly, the consolidated financial statements of Roosevelt have been
restated to include the results of Farm & Home for the periods presented. On
July 1, 1994, Roosevelt completed the sale of Farm & Home's construction
lending business for $75 million in cash.
On October 20, 1995, Roosevelt completed the acquisition of WSB Bancorp,
Inc. ("WSB"), Washington, Missouri, the holding company for Washington
Savings. Upon consummation of the merger, each WSB stockholder became entitled
to receive $22.75 in cash for each share of WSB common stock held. As of the
date of the acquisition, WSB had $97 million in total consolidated assets, $81
million in deposits and stockholders' equity of $19 million.
On December 29, 1995, Roosevelt completed the acquisition of Kirksville
Bancshares, Inc. ("Kirksville"), Kirksville, Missouri, the holding company for
Kirksville Bank. Upon consummation of the merger, each Kirksville stockholder
became entitled to receive 2.4437 shares of Roosevelt Common Stock. As of the
date of the acquisition, Kirksville had total consolidated assets of $131
million, deposits of $102 million and stockholders' equity of $21 million.
On April 9, 1996, Roosevelt entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to
which Mutual, Jefferson City, Missouri, the holding company for Mutual Bank,
will merge with and into Roosevelt, and Mutual Bank will merge with Roosevelt
Bank. Upon the consummation of the transactions, each Mutual stockholder will
become entitled to receive a number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock equal
to the quotient of (A) $23.00 divided by (B) the weighted average sale price
of all Roosevelt Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq National Market during the
ten trading days ending on the date that is three trading days prior to the
closing date of the transaction. As of March 31, 1996, Mutual had total
consolidated assets of $53 million, deposits of $46 million and stockholders'
equity of $6 million. Roosevelt filed an application with the OTS for approval
of the Mutual acquisition in May 1996, and received such approval in July
1996. Mutual commenced its solicitation of Mutual shareholders for approval of
the acquisition on September 24, 1996. Roosevelt anticipates that the
acquisition will close in the middle of the forth quarter of 1996.
On April 16, 1996, Roosevelt entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to
which "CCC", St. Louis, Missouri, the holding company for Missouri State Bank,
will be merged with Roosevelt, resulting in Missouri State Bank becoming a
stand-alone first tier subsidiary of Roosevelt. Upon the consummation of the
merger, each CCC stockholder will become entitled to receive 1.6 shares of
Roosevelt Common Stock. As of June 30, 1996, CCC had total consolidated assets
of $64.7 million, deposits of $56.8 million and stockholders' equity of $5.8
million. Roosevelt filed an application with the Missouri Division of Finance
(the "MDF") in June 1996 and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (the "FRB") in July 1996 for approval of the acquisition of Missouri
State Bank and received the approval of the MDF in July 1996 and the FRB in
August 1996. CCC commenced its solicitation of CCC shareholders for approval
of the acquisition on September 20, 1996. Roosevelt anticipates that the CCC
acquisition will close in the middle of the fourth quarter of 1996.
BANK HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION
General. Upon consummation of the acquisition of Missouri State Bank,
Roosevelt will become a bank holding company and register as such with the
FRB. As a result of recent legislation, Roosevelt will no longer be regulated
as a savings and loan holding company, but only as a bank holding company.
Bank holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FRB
under the BHCA and the regulations of the FRB. As a bank holding company,
Roosevelt will be required to file reports with the FRB and such additional
information as the FRB may require, and will be subject to regular
examinations by the FRB. The FRB also has extensive enforcement authority over
bank holding companies, including, among other things, the ability to assess
civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal orders and to
require that a holding company divest subsidiaries (including its bank
subsidiaries). In general, enforcement actions may be initiated for violations
of law and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
21
<PAGE>
Under FRB policy, a bank holding company must serve as a source of strength
for its subsidiary banks. Under this policy the FRB may require, and has
required in the past, a holding company to contribute additional capital to an
undercapitalized subsidiary bank.
Under the BHCA, a bank holding company must obtain FRB approval before: (i)
acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of any voting shares
of another bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, it would
own or control more than 5% of such shares (unless it already owns or controls
the majority of such shares); (ii) acquiring all or substantially all of the
assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (iii) merging or
consolidating with another bank holding company.
As a savings and loan holding company, Roosevelt is generally not subject to
any activity restrictions, but as a bank holding company will be subject to
more restrictive activity limitations imposed on bank holding companies. The
BHCA prohibits a bank holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring
direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares
of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company, or from engaging
directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or
controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal
exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain non-bank activities which, by
statute or by FRB regulation or order, have been identified as activities
closely related to the business of banking or managing or controlling banks.
The list of activities permitted by the FRB includes, among other things,
operating a savings institution (such as Roosevelt Bank), mortgage company,
finance company, credit card company or factoring company; performing certain
data processing operations; providing certain investment and financial advice;
underwriting and acting as an insurance agent for certain types of credit-
related insurance; leasing property on a full-payout, non-operating basis;
selling money orders, travelers' checks and United States Savings Bonds; real
estate and personal property appraising; providing tax planning and
preparation services; and, subject to certain limitations, providing
securities brokerage services for customers. The scope of permissible
activities may be expanded from time to time by the FRB. Such activities may
also be affected by federal legislation.
Interstate Banking and Branching. In 1994, the Riegle-Neal Interstate
Banking and Branching Act of 1994 (the "Act") was enacted to ease restrictions
on interstate banking. Effective September 29, 1995, the Act allows the FRB to
approve an application of an adequately capitalized and adequately managed
bank holding company to acquire control of, or acquire all or substantially
all of the assets of, a bank located in a state other than such holding
company's home state, without regard to whether the transaction is prohibited
by the laws of any state. The FRB may not approve the acquisition of a bank
that has not been in existence for the minimum time period (not exceeding five
years) specified by the statutory law of the host state. The Act also
prohibits the FRB from approving an application if the applicant (and its
depository institution affiliates) controls or would control more than 10% of
the insured deposits in the United States or 30% or more of the deposits in
the target bank's home state or in any state in which the target bank
maintains a branch. The Act does not affect the authority of states to limit
the percentage of total insured deposits in the state which may be held or
controlled by a bank or bank holding company to the extent such limitation
does not discriminate against out-of-state banks or bank holding companies.
Individual states may also waive the 30% state-wide concentration limit
contained in the Act.
Additionally, beginning on June 1, 1997, the federal banking agencies will
be authorized to approve interstate merger transactions without regard to
whether such transaction is prohibited by the law of any state, unless the
home state of one of the banks opts out of the Act by enacting a law after the
date of enactment of the Act and prior to June 1, 1997 which applies equally
to all out-of-state banks and expressly prohibits merger transactions
involving out-of-state banks. A state may also permit such transaction before
such time by enacting authorizing legislation. Interstate acquisitions of
branches will be permitted only if the law of the state in which the branch is
located permits such acquisitions. Interstate mergers and branch acquisitions
will also be subject to the nationwide and statewide insured deposit
concentration amounts described above.
The Act authorizes the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC")
and FDIC to approve interstate branching de novo by national and state banks,
respectively, only in states which specifically allow for such branching. The
Act also requires the appropriate federal banking agencies to prescribe
regulations by
22
<PAGE>
June 1, 1997 which prohibit any out-of-state bank from using the interstate
branching authority primarily for the purpose of deposit production. These
regulations must include guidelines to ensure that interstate branches
operated by an out-of-state bank in a host state are reasonably helping to
meet the credit needs of the communities which they serve. The State of
Missouri has not yet authorized interstate merger transactions or de novo
interstate branching.
Any future acquisitions of thrift institutions by Roosevelt will continue to
be subject to the HOLA only if they are merged with Roosevelt Bank. As a
federal thrift institution, Roosevelt Bank, subject to certain conditions, has
nationwide branching authority.
Dividends. The FRB has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash
dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the FRB's view that a
bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that its net
income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a
rate of earning retention that is consistent with the holding company's
capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB also
indicated that it would be inappropriate for a company experiencing serious
financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, under the
prompt corrective action regulations adopted by the FRB, the FRB may prohibit
a bank holding company from paying any dividends if the holding company's bank
subsidiary is classified as "undercapitalized. "
Bank holding companies are required to give the FRB prior written notice of
any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross
consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net
consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding
12 months, is equal to 10% or more of their consolidated net worth. The FRB
may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the
proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any
law, regulation, FRB order, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement
with, the FRB. This notification requirement does not apply to any company
that meets the well-capitalized standard for commercial banks, has a safety
and soundness examination rating of at least a "2" and is not subject to any
unresolved supervisory issues.
Capital Requirements. The FRB has established capital requirements for bank
holding companies that generally parallel the capital requirements for
national banks and federal thrift institutions such as Roosevelt Bank. As a
thrift holding company, Roosevelt is not subject to any minimum capital
requirements.
ROOSEVELT BANK
Roosevelt Bank is a federally chartered savings bank with $9.3 billion in
consolidated assets at June 30, 1996, making it the largest Missouri-based
thrift institution. Roosevelt Bank has 79 full-service offices with 38 offices
serving the St. Louis metropolitan area (including Alton and Granite City,
Illinois) and nine offices serving the Kansas City metropolitan area. The
remaining 32 offices are located in Staunton, Illinois and Pittsburg, Kansas
and the Missouri cities of Hannibal (2), Springfield (3), Columbia, Union,
Warrenton, St. James, Washington, Sikeston, Dexter, Malden, Poplar Bluff,
Hayti, Portageville, Cape Girardeau, Mexico, Jefferson City, Trenton,
Marshall, Sedalia, Clinton, Maryville, St. Joseph, Nevada, Lamar, Joplin (2)
and Kirksville. Incorporated as a Missouri chartered mutual savings and loan
in 1934, Roosevelt Bank converted to a federally chartered savings and loan in
1935. In 1987, Roosevelt Bank became a stock savings and loan and, one year
later, converted to a stock savings bank.
Roosevelt Bank is subject to examination and comprehensive regulation and
oversight by the OTS and the FDIC. Roosevelt Bank is further subject to
regulations of the FRB with respect to reserves required to be maintained
against transaction accounts. Roosevelt Bank is a member of the Federal Home
Loan Bank ("FHLB") of Des Moines, which is one of the 12 regional banks
constituting the FHLB system and its savings deposits are insured by the SAIF
to the maximum extent permitted by the FDIC.
For additional information, see "Selected Consolidated Financial and Other
Data of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc." and "Business of Roosevelt Financial
Group, Inc."
23
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Sentinel is a Delaware corporation formed in September 1993 to act as the
holding company for Sentinel Federal upon the completion of the conversion in
January 1994. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel had total consolidated assets of
$143.8 million, deposits of $123.3 million and stockholders' equity of $11.7
million. The executive offices of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal are located at
1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106, and the telephone number at
that address is (816) 474-9800.
SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY
Sentinel Federal is a federally chartered savings and loan association
headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri. Sentinel Federal was organized in 1919
as a Missouri mutual savings and loan association under the name "Baptist
Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City." In 1935, Sentinel Federal
converted to a federally chartered savings and loan association and changed
its name to "Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City."
Sentinel Federal is regulated by the OTS and its deposits are insured up to
applicable limits under the SAIF. Sentinel Federal also is a member of the
FHLB System.
Sentinel Federal's principal business consists of attracting deposits from
the general public, originating loans secured primarily by owner-occupied
residential properties and purchasing mortgage-related securities through the
secondary market. To a significantly lesser extent, Sentinel Federal also
originates consumer, commercial real estate, and commercial business loans.
On December 20, 1989, Sentinel Federal entered into a Supervisory Agreement
with the OTS as a result of OTS criticisms of Sentinel Federal's policies and
operations and its reduced capital position. In May 1990, Sentinel Federal
also signed a Capital Plan agreement as a result of its low level of core
capital. The Capital Plan was terminated on June 1, 1994 due to increases in
capital levels primarily as a result of the initial public offering completed
as part of the Conversion. However, the Supervisory Agreement remains in
effect until terminated by the OTS. The Supervisory Agreement requires
Sentinel Federal to follow certain limitations primarily relating to Sentinel
Federal's internal operations, lending activities and investments.
For additional information, see "Selected Consolidated Financial and Other
Data of Sentinel Financial Corporation" and "Business of Sentinel Financial
Corporation."
THE SPECIAL MEETING
PLACE, TIME AND DATE
The Special Meeting is scheduled to be held at the downtown Kansas City
Office of Sentinel located at 1001 Walnut Street Kansas City, Missouri, on
Thursday, October 31, 1996 at 10:00 a.m., local time. This Proxy
Statement/Prospectus is being sent to holders of record, and certain
beneficial owners, of Sentinel Common Stock as of the Record Date (as defined
below), and is accompanied by a form of proxy which the Sentinel Board
requests that stockholders execute and return to Sentinel for use at the
Special Meeting.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED
At the Special Meeting, holders of Sentinel Common Stock as of the Record
Date will vote upon a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby. Holders of Sentinel Common Stock also may
consider and vote upon such other matters as are properly brought before the
Special Meeting. As of the date hereof, the Sentinel Board knows of no
business that will be presented for consideration at the Special Meeting,
other than the matters described in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
24
<PAGE>
RECORD DATE; VOTE REQUIRED
The Sentinel Board has fixed the close of business on September 27, 1996
(the "Record Date") as the time for determining holders of Sentinel Common
Stock who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting. Only
holders of record of Sentinel Common Stock on the Record Date will be entitled
to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting. As of the Record Date, there
were 513,423 shares of Sentinel Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote
at the Special Meeting.
Each holder of record of shares of Sentinel Common Stock on the Record Date
will be entitled to cast one vote per share on each proposal at the Special
Meeting. Such vote may be exercised in person or by properly executed proxy.
The presence, in person or by properly executed proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Sentinel Common Stock entitled to vote
at the Special Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will be treated as shares present at the Special Meeting for
purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
Approval of the Merger Agreement at the Special Meeting will require the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Sentinel Common Stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. As a result,
abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against
the Merger Agreement.
As of September 27, 1996, the directors and executive officers of Sentinel
and their affiliates beneficially owned in the aggregate 44,620 shares
(excluding 64,305 shares underlying stock options, which shares may not be
voted at the Special Meeting), or 12.5% of the then outstanding shares of
Sentinel Common Stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. Each director
of Sentinel has entered into a Voting Agreement whereby each such director has
agreed to vote all his shares of Sentinel Common Stock owned by him (57,241
shares in the aggregate for all directors) for approval of the Merger
Agreement. As of August 1, 1996, the directors and executive officers of
Roosevelt and their affiliates beneficially owned in the aggregate 1,000
shares of Sentinel Common Stock.
25
<PAGE>
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF
The following table sets forth, as of September 27, 1996, certain
information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Sentinel Common Stock
by: (i) those persons who were known by the management of Sentinel to be
beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Sentinel Common
Stock; (ii) each director of Sentinel; and (iii) all directors and executive
officers of Sentinel as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AND AMOUNT AND NATURE PERCENT OF
ADDRESS OF OF BENEFICIAL COMMON STOCK
BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP(1) OUTSTANDING
---------------- ----------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
James F. Dierberg
Individual Retirement Account
39 Glen Eagles Drive
St. Louis, Missouri 63124..................... 51,105(2) 9.95%
Jeffrey S. Halis
500 Park Avenue
Fifth Floor
New York, New York 10022...................... 31,999(3) 6.23
Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association
Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust........... 25,500(4) 5.00
Craig D. Laemmli
1001 Walnut Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64106................... 32,739(5) 6.16
John H. Grow................................... 7,990 1.54
Glennon E. McFarland........................... 9,490 1.83
Willard S. Norton.............................. 11,740 2.27
Donald E. Kuenzi, M.D.......................... 17,890 3.46
Robert C. Taul................................. 11,490 2.22
Ron C. Castle.................................. 1,000 .19
All Officers and Directors as a Group (13
persons)...................................... 108,925 19.52
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes all shares held directly as well as by spouses, other immediate
family members, in trust and other forms of indirect ownership, over which
shares the named persons possess voting and investment power. This table
also includes shares of Sentinel Common Stock subject to outstanding
options exercisable within 60 days pursuant to the Sentinel Stock Option
Plan and shares allocated to participants' accounts under Sentinel
Federal's Management Recognition and Development Plan and the Sentinel
Federal Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the "ESOP").
(2) This information is based on records maintained by Sentinel and
information from a Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") in June 1994.
(3) This information is based on records maintained by Sentinel and
information from a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC in February 1994.
(4) The ESOP purchased 25,500 shares of the Sentinel Common Stock for the
exclusive benefit of participating employees with funds borrowed from
Sentinel in connection with the Conversion, ESOP shares are held in a
suspense account for allocation among participants on the basis of
compensation as the loan is repaid. A committee appointed by the Sentinel
Board (the "ESOP Committee") administers the ESOP. The Sentinel Board has
appointed Directors Laemmli, Grow and Norton, as trustees for the ESOP
(the "ESOP Trustee"). The Sentinel Board may instruct the ESOP Trustee
regarding investments of funds contributed to the ESOP. The ESOP Trustee
must vote all allocated shares held in the ESOP in accordance with the
instructions of the participating employees. Unallocated shares will be
voted by the ESOP Trustee as directed by the ESOP Committee. The ESOP
Committee is composed of Directors Laemmli, Grow and Norton.
(5) This information is based on records maintained by Sentinel and
information from a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC in September 1995.
26
<PAGE>
PROXIES
Shares of Sentinel Common Stock represented by properly executed proxies
received prior to or at the Special Meeting will, unless such proxies have
been revoked, be voted at the Special Meeting in accordance with the
instructions indicated in the proxies. If no instructions are indicated on a
properly executed proxy, the shares will be voted FOR the Merger Agreement.
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation or otherwise may be revoked by
the person giving it at any time before it is voted by delivering to John C.
Spencer, Secretary of Sentinel, at 1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri
64106 on or before the taking of the vote at the Special Meeting, a written
notice of revocation bearing a later date than the proxy or a later dated
proxy relating to the same shares of Sentinel Common Stock or by attending the
Special Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Special Meeting will
not in itself constitute the revocation of a proxy.
If any other matters are properly presented at the Special Meeting for
consideration, the persons named in the proxy or acting thereunder will have
discretion to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. As
of the date hereof, the Sentinel Board knows of no such other matters.
In addition to solicitation by mail, directors, officers, and employees of
Sentinel, who will not be specifically compensated for such services, may
solicit proxies from the stockholders of Sentinel, personally or by telephone,
telegram or other forms of communication. Brokerage houses, nominees,
fiduciaries and other custodians will be requested to forward soliciting
materials to beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable
expenses incurred in sending proxy material to beneficial owners. Sentinel
will generally bear its own expenses in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for the Special Meeting, except that Roosevelt will pay all printing
and mailing expenses associated with the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. In
addition, Roosevelt has retained Regan & Associates to assist Sentinel in the
proxy solicitation process. Roosevelt has agreed to pay Regant Associates a
fee of $5,000 for its services to be rendered.
HOLDERS OF SENTINEL COMMON STOCK ARE REQUESTED TO COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN
THE ACCOMPANYING FORM OF PROXY AND TO RETURN IT PROMPTLY TO SENTINEL IN THE
ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.
HOLDERS OF SENTINEL COMMON STOCK SHOULD NOT FORWARD STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH
THEIR PROXY CARDS.
27
<PAGE>
THE MERGER
The information in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus concerning the terms of
the Merger is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
Merger Agreement, which is attached hereto as Appendix I and incorporated by
reference herein. All stockholders are urged to read the Merger Agreement in
its entirety.
GENERAL
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Sentinel will be merged with and into
Roosevelt, with Roosevelt being the surviving entity (the "Company Merger")
and, immediately thereafter, Sentinel Federal will be merged with Roosevelt
Bank (the "Bank Merger" and, together with the Company Merger, the "Merger").
As soon as possible after the conditions to consummation of the Merger
described below have been satisfied or waived, and unless the Merger Agreement
has been terminated as provided below, Roosevelt and Sentinel will file a
certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware for the Company
Merger, and articles of combination with the OTS for the Bank Merger. The
Company Merger will become effective upon the filing of the certificate of
merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware. The Bank Merger will become
effective at the time the articles of combination are endorsed by the OTS. The
time at which the Company Merger becomes effective is referred to herein as
the "Effective Time."
Upon consummation of the Merger, each outstanding share of Sentinel Common
Stock (other than any share held by a holder who perfects dissenters' rights
or any other excluded share) shall be converted into 1.4231 shares of
Roosevelt Common Stock, subject to adjustment such that if the weighted
average sale price of all Roosevelt Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq National
Market during the ten trading day period ending on the date that is three
trading days prior to the Closing Date of the Merger (the "Average Pre-Closing
Trading Price") is less than $15.83 per share, the Exchange Ratio shall be
equal to $22.525 divided by the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in which
event a greater number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock would be issued
than if there were no adjustment to the Exchange Ratio), and if the Average
Pre-Closing Trading Price is greater than $21.42 per share, the Exchange Ratio
shall be equal to $30.475 divided by the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in
which event fewer shares of Roosevelt Common Stock would be issued than if
there were no adjustment to the Exchange Ratio). Each stockholder of Sentinel
shall be entitled to exchange Sentinel Common Stock certificates for Roosevelt
Common Stock certificates and thereupon shall cease to be a stockholder of
Sentinel, and the separate existence and corporate organization of Sentinel
shall cease.
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER
Effective January 4, 1994, Sentinel Federal converted from a federal mutual
savings and loan association to a federal stock savings and loan association.
At the same time, Sentinel Federal became a wholly owned subsidiary of
Sentinel, a newly formed savings and loan holding company. In connection with
the Conversion, Sentinel completed an initial public offering, selling 513,523
shares of Sentinel Common Stock at $10.00 per share.
Following the Conversion and consistent with Sentinel's business plan,
management of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal concentrated their efforts
primarily on the improvement of Sentinel Federal's core business of obtaining
deposits from the public and originating one- to four-family mortgage loans.
In addition, Sentinel Federal also pursued the objective of controlling
operating expenses as a means of improving overall profitability.
Throughout the period following the Conversion, Sentinel also considered its
strategic alternatives, taking into account its market area and size, in light
of the increased rate of consolidation in the financial services industry.
These alternatives included expansion into related businesses, expansion of
loan and deposit products offered to the public and raising Sentinel Federal's
profile in the local community through increased advertising and community
involvement. In addition, consistent with the overall objective of maximizing
the long-term value of shareholders' interests, in response to suggestions
from various parties, including shareholders, management and the Sentinel
Board considered engaging in a business combination.
28
<PAGE>
Since the Conversion, Sentinel management and the Sentinel Board have been
aware of the significant and rapid consolidation that has been occurring among
the providers of banking and financial services in Sentinel Federal's market.
Management and the Sentinel Board have also been aware that the larger
financial institutions that emerge from such consolidations may acquire
substantial competitive advantages, including greater diversity in their loan
portfolios, cost savings through the integration of redundant operations and
support functions, improved access to capital and funding and the ability to
spread the costs of developing new products and services over a wider customer
base.
Management and the Sentinel Board have also monitored other developments,
such as the uncertainty surrounding the thrift industry due to the deposit
insurance premium differential between institutions insured by the SAIF and
those insured by the BIF, the anticipated effects on the thrift industry of
regulatory agency consolidation and the attractiveness of thrift acquisition
premiums.
During the early part of 1996, management was approached by Roosevelt
regarding a possible business combination and preliminary discussions were
initiated regarding the terms and conditions of Roosevelt's proposal. Based
upon these preliminary discussions, the Sentinel Board authorized management
to pursue additional discussions with Roosevelt and to provide Roosevelt with
information to facilitate Roosevelt's review of the business, assets and
operations of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal.
Additional discussions occurred in February and early March 1996, during
which period Roosevelt also conducted a due diligence review of Sentinel and
Sentinel Federal. During the same period, management and the Sentinel Board
reviewed with special legal counsel, Breyer & Aguggia, the legal ramifications
of a business combination generally and initiated a survey of market data
regarding other business combinations involving community financial
institutions. Subsequently, on March 1, 1996, the Sentinel Board retained
Trident to render an opinion that the consideration to be received in the
Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to Sentinel's shareholders.
The Sentinel Board also evaluated whether the interests of the shareholders of
Sentinel Common Stock would be best served by remaining independent or by
pursuing a business combination with Roosevelt on the basis of the discussions
held to date. Specifically, the Sentinel Board considered whether the proposed
business combination would result in a return of value to Sentinel
shareholders that could not be achieved through Sentinel's continued operation
as an independent entity with continued emphasis on building shareholder value
through expansion of operations, increasing earnings and enhancing operating
efficiencies. The Sentinel Board concluded that the proposed business
combination with Roosevelt would result in a greater return to Sentinel
shareholders than could be achieved through Sentinal's continued independent
operation.
A draft definitive agreement was submitted by Roosevelt in March 1996 and
further negotiations were conducted with Roosevelt during March, with the
involvement of Breyer & Aguggia regarding the terms and conditions of the
definitive agreement, and Trident regarding the structure of the Merger
Consideration (as defined herein). These negotiations resulted in the
presentation of the Merger Agreement to the Sentinel Board on March 20, 1996.
At this meeting, the Board received a comprehensive report on the course of
the negotiations with Roosevelt and the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement were reviewed extensively with the Sentinel Board by Breyer &
Aguggia.
The meeting was adjourned and reconvened on March 22, 1996 whereupon Trident
reviewed with the Sentinel Board the proposed Merger Consideration, which was
derived through arms' length negotiations, and the adjustments to the Merger
Consideration in the event of potential movements in the price of Roosevelt
Common Stock, which have been established as described elsewhere in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus. See""--General" and the second paragraph of such
section. The Sentinel Board also extensively reviewed with legal counsel and
Trident (i) the proposed terms of the transaction compared to other comparable
transactions, (ii) financial information regarding Roosevelt, (iii) the
results of a due diligence analysis of Roosevelt, (iv) the proposed treatment
of Sentinel Federal employees and (v) alternative valuations of Sentinel. The
Sentinel Board also reviewed the prospects for realizing comparable
shareholder returns by remaining an independent entity. Finally, the Sentinel
Board reviewed and discussed the text of Trident's proposed opinion to the
effect that the
29
<PAGE>
Merger Consideration, as of such date, was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of Sentinel Common Stock. The Sentinel Board also
reviewed the anticipated tax consequences of the transaction. Thereafter, the
Sentinel Board unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and authorized
management, in consultation with legal counsel, to enter into and carry out
the Merger Agreement.
REASONS FOR THE MERGER; RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Sentinel Board believes that the terms of the Merger Agreement, which
are the product of arm's length negotiations between representatives of
Roosevelt and Sentinel, are fair and in the best interests of Sentinel and its
stockholders. Moreover, there is no affiliation between any of the directors
and officers of the respective companies. In the course of reaching its
determination, the Sentinel Board consulted with legal counsel with respect to
its legal duties, the terms of the Merger Agreement and the issues related
thereto, and with Trident with respect to the financial aspects and fairness
of the transaction and with senior management regarding, among other things,
operational matters.
In reaching its determination to approve the Merger Agreement, the Sentinel
Board considered all factors it deemed material, which include the following:
(a) The Sentinel Board analyzed information with respect to the financial
condition, results of operations, cash flow, businesses and prospects of
Sentinel. In this regard, the Sentinel Board analyzed the options of
selling Sentinel or continuing on a stand-alone basis. The range of values
on a sale of control basis were determined to generally exceed the present
value of Sentinel shares on a stand-alone basis under business strategies
which could be reasonably implemented by Sentinel.
(b) The Sentinel Board considered the written opinion of Trident that, as
of March 22, 1996, the Merger Consideration to be received by holders of
Sentinel Common Stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair to Sentinel
stockholders from a financial point of view. See "--Opinion of Financial
Advisor."
(c) The Sentinel Board considered the current operating environment,
including, but not limited to, the continued consolidation and increasing
competition in the banking and financial services industries, the prospect
for further changes in these industries, the controversy pertaining to the
BIF/SAIF deposit insurance premium differential and federal regulatory
agency consolidation and the importance of being able to capitalize on
developing opportunities in these industries. This information had been
periodically reviewed by the Sentinel Board at its regular meetings in the
months following the Conversion to stock form and was also discussed
between the Sentinel Board and Sentinel's various advisors.
(d) The Sentinel Board considered the other terms of the Merger Agreement
and exhibits thereto, including that the Merger would generally be income
tax free to Sentinel shareholders.
(e) The Sentinel Board considered detailed financial analyses, pro forma
and other information with respect to Sentinel and Roosevelt discussed by
Trident, as well as the Sentinel Board's own knowledge of Sentinel,
Roosevelt and their respective businesses. In this regard, the latest
publicly-available financial and other information for Sentinel and
Roosevelt were analyzed, including a comparison to publicly-available
financial and other information for other similar savings institutions. The
Sentinel Board also considered the relative liquidity of Sentinel Common
Stock and Roosevelt Common Stock.
(f) The Sentinel Board considered the value of Sentinel continuing as a
stand-alone entity compared to the effect of Sentinel combining with
Roosevelt in light of the factors summarized above and the current economic
and financial environment, including, but not limited to, other possible
strategic alternatives.
(g) The Sentinel Board considered the likelihood of the Merger being
approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities, including factors such
as market share analyses, Roosevelt's Community Reinvestment Act rating at
that time and the estimated pro forma financial impact of the Merger on
Roosevelt.
30
<PAGE>
(h) The Sentinel Board considered the fact that the Merger Agreement
prohibits Sentinel from initiating, soliciting, or encouraging discussions
with third parties relating to alternative transactions and requires the
payment of a termination fee of $680,000 to Roosevelt in certain events,
and the fact that Roosevelt required such provisions as a condition to
entering into the Merger Agreement.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the
Sentinel Board is not intended to be exhaustive, but constitutes the material
factors considered by the Sentinel Board. In reaching its determination to
approve and recommend the Merger Agreement, the Sentinel Board did not assign
any relative or specific weights to the foregoing factors, and individual
directors may have weighed factors differently. After deliberating with
respect to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement and considering, among other things, the matters discussed above and
the opinion of Trident referred to above, the Sentinel Board unanimously
approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby as being in the best interests of Sentinel and its stockholders.
FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH ABOVE, THE SENTINEL BOARD HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED
THE MERGER AGREEMENT AS ADVISABLE AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF SENTINEL AND
SENTINEL STOCKHOLDERS AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS OF SENTINEL VOTE
FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
MERGER CONSIDERATION
Subject to the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the Merger
Agreement, each share of Sentinel Common Stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Merger (other than shares held by holders who perfect
dissenters' rights, of Sentinel Common Stock held by Roosevelt or Sentinel and
other excluded shares) will be converted into 1.4231 shares (the "Exchange
Ratio") of Roosevelt Common Stock (the "Merger Consideration"). The Exchange
Ratio is subject to adjustment, such that if the weighted average sale price
of all Roosevelt Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq National Market during the
ten trading day period ending on the date that is three trading days prior to
the Closing Date of the Merger (the "Average Pre-Closing Trading Price") is
less than $15.83 per share, the Exchange Ratio shall be equal to $22.525
divided by the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in which case a greater
number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock would be issued than if there were
no adjustment to the Exchange Ratio), and if the Average Pre-Closing Trading
Price is greater than $21.42 per share the Exchange Ratio shall be equal to
$30.475 divided by the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price (in which case fewer
shares of Roosevelt Common Stock would be issued than if there were no
adjustment to the Exchange Ratio). The Exchange Ratio was determined through
arm's length negotiations between Roosevelt and Sentinel, which was advised
during such negotiations by Trident.
Each share of Roosevelt Common Stock issued and outstanding at the Effective
Time will remain outstanding and unchanged as a result of the Merger. No
fractional shares of Roosevelt Common Stock will be issued in the Merger, and
Sentinel stockholders who otherwise would be entitled to receive a fractional
share of Roosevelt Common Stock will receive a cash payment in lieu thereof.
See "--Fractional Shares."
The number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock to be received for each share
of Sentinel Common Stock is 1.4231, subject to adjustment as described above.
Based on the last reported sale price for Roosevelt Common Stock on the Nasdaq
National Market on October 10, 1996 ($17.75 per share), the value of 1.4231
shares of Roosevelt Common Stock as of that date would have been approximately
$25.26 At the present time, there is no established market in which shares of
Sentinel Common Stock are regularly traded, nor are there any uniformly quoted
prices for such shares. The last trade of shares of Sentinel Common Stock
known by management of Sentinel occurred during April 1996. The closing bid
price for Sentinel Common Stock on October 10, 1996 was $21.00 per share, as
reported by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. The market value of Roosevelt
Common Stock to be received in the Merger, however, is subject to fluctuation.
Fluctuations in the market price of Roosevelt Common Stock would generally
result in an increase or decrease in the value of the Merger Consideration to
be received by Sentinel stockholders in the Merger. An increase in the market
value of Roosevelt Common Stock would generally increase the market value of
the Merger Consideration to be received
31
<PAGE>
by Sentinel stockholders in the Merger. A decrease in the market value of
Roosevelt Common Stock would generally have the opposite effect. The market
value of the Merger Consideration at the time of the Merger will depend upon
various factors, including the market value of a share of Roosevelt Common
Stock at such time and any effect of the Merger itself. Sentinel stockholders
are urged to obtain a current price quotation of Roosevelt Common Stock. See
"--Waiver and Amendment; Termination."
TREATMENT OF SENTINEL STOCK OPTIONS
At the Effective Time, the Sentinel Option Plan and each outstanding
Sentinel Stock Option thereunder (including options granted to non-employee
directors of Sentinel pursuant to any amendment of the Sentinel Option Plan)
to purchase Sentinel Common Stock will be assumed by Roosevelt. Upon such
assumption, each Sentinel Stock Option will become an option to purchase the
number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock equal to the product of the number
of shares of Sentinel Common Stock subject to the original option and the
Exchange Ratio, with the exercise price under each substituted option equal to
the original exercise price of the corresponding Sentinel Stock Option divided
by the Exchange Ratio, and otherwise subject to the terms of the Sentinel
Option Plan.
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR
Sentinel retained Trident to act as its financial advisor and to render a
fairness opinion in connection with the Merger. As part of its engagement,
Trident performed a valuation analysis of Sentinel in an acquisition context.
On March 22, 1996, the day Sentinel executed the Merger Agreement, Trident
presented its valuation report (the "Valuation Report") to the Sentinel Board.
At that time, Trident reviewed the proposed terms of the Merger Agreement and
presented a report (the "Merger Analysis and Due Diligence Report")
summarizing the financial terms of the Merger and providing market information
with respect to thrift mergers and acquisitions. Trident also compared
Roosevelt's offer to the valuation of Sentinel set forth in the Valuation
Report. Trident further reported on its financial analysis and on-site due
diligence examination of Roosevelt. In addition, Trident rendered its written
opinion to the Sentinel Board to the effect that, as of that date, the
consideration to be received by Sentinel's stockholders pursuant to the Merger
Agreement was fair from a financial point of view.
Trident delivered its updated written opinion to the Sentinel Board as of
the date of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus stating that, as of such date, the
consideration to be received by the stockholders of Sentinel in the Merger is
fair from a financial point of view. Trident has consented to the inclusion of
such opinion and the related disclosure in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
which will be circulated to Sentinel's stockholders.
TRIDENT'S OPINION IS DIRECTED TO THE SENTINEL BOARD AND IS DIRECTED ONLY TO
THE FAIRNESS, FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW, OF THE CONSIDERATION TO BE
RECEIVED BY SENTINEL'S STOCKHOLDERS BASED ON CONDITIONS AS THEY EXISTED AND
COULD BE EVALUATED AS OF THE DATE OF THE OPINION. TRIDENT'S OPINION DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY SENTINEL STOCKHOLDER AS TO HOW SUCH
STOCKHOLDER SHOULD VOTE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, NOR DOES TRIDENT'S OPINION
ADDRESS THE UNDERLYING BUSINESS DECISION TO EFFECT THE MERGER. THIS SUMMARY OF
TRIDENT'S OPINION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FULL TEXT
OF SUCH OPINION, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AS
APPENDIX II. STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ TRIDENT'S OPINION IN ITS ENTIRETY
FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THE ASSUMPTIONS MADE AND MATTERS CONSIDERED AND THE
LIMITS ON THE REVIEW UNDERTAKEN IN RENDERING SUCH OPINION.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Trident reviewed and analyzed,
among other things, the following: (i) the Merger Agreement; (ii) this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus; (iii) certain publicly available information concerning
Sentinel, including the audited financial statements of Sentinel for each of
the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1995, and unaudited
financial statements for the six months ended December 31, 1994 and 1995; (iv)
certain publicly available information concerning Roosevelt, including the
audited financial
32
<PAGE>
statements of Roosevelt for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1995; (v) certain other internal information, primarily financial
in nature, concerning the business and operations of Sentinel and Roosevelt
furnished to Trident by Sentinel and Roosevelt for purposes of Trident's
analysis; (vi) certain information with respect to the pricing and trading of
Sentinel Common Stock; (vii) certain information with respect to the pricing
and trading of Roosevelt Common Stock; (viii) certain publicly available
information with respect to other companies that Trident believed to be
comparable to Sentinel and Roosevelt and the trading markets for such other
companies' securities; and (ix) certain publicly available information
concerning the nature and terms of other transactions that Trident considered
relevant to its inquiry. Trident also met with certain officers and employees
of Sentinel and Roosevelt to discuss the foregoing, as well as other matters
which it believed relevant to its inquiry.
In its review and analysis, and in arriving at its opinion, Trident assumed
and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and
other information provided to it or that was publicly available and did not
attempt independently to verify any such information. Trident did not conduct
a physical inspection of the properties or facilities of Sentinel or
Roosevelt, nor did it make or obtain any independent evaluations or appraisals
of any of such properties or facilities.
In conducting its analysis and arriving at its opinion, Trident considered
such financial and other factors as it deemed appropriate under the
circumstances, including, among others, the following: (i) the historical and
current financial condition and results of operations of Sentinel and
Roosevelt, including interest income, interest expense, net interest income,
net interest margin, interest sensitivity, non-interest expense, earnings,
dividends, book value, return on assets, return on equity, capitalization, the
amount and type of non-performing assets and the reserve for loan losses; (ii)
the business prospects of Sentinel and Roosevelt; (iii) the economies in
Sentinel's and Roosevelt's market areas; (iv) the historical and current
market for Sentinel Common Stock and Roosevelt Common Stock and for the equity
securities of certain other companies that Trident believed to be comparable
to Sentinel and Roosevelt; and (v) the nature and terms of certain other
acquisition transactions that Trident believed to be relevant. Trident also
took into account its assessment of general economic, market, financial and
regulatory conditions and trends, as well as its knowledge of the financial
institutions industry, its experience in connection with similar transactions,
and its knowledge of securities valuation generally. Trident's opinion
necessarily was based upon conditions in existence and subject to evaluation
on the respective dates of its opinion. Trident's opinion is, in any event,
limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration
to be received by the holders of Sentinel Common Stock in the Merger and does
not address Sentinel's underlying business decision to effect the Merger.
Trident met with the Sentinel Board on March 22, 1996 to present its
analyses, which serve as the basis for Trident's opinion. At this time,
Trident presented the Valuation Report and the Merger Analysis and Due
Diligence Report. The following is a brief summary of the Valuation Report
presented by Trident to the Sentinel Board on March 22, 1996.
Financial Analysis of Sentinel. Trident examined Sentinel's financial
performance for the period June 30, 1992 through December 31, 1995 by
analyzing the composition of its balance sheet, adjusting and normalizing its
earnings, and calculating a variety of operating and financial ratios for
Sentinel.
This analysis showed, among other things, that during the three and one half
year period ended December 31, 1995: (i) Sentinel's deposits decreased from
89.8% to 82.6% of assets; (ii) borrowed funds increased from 5.9% to 8.9% of
total assets; (iii) investment and mortgage-backed securities increased from
29.5% to 43.3%; and (iv) equity capital increased from 2.6% to 7.3% of assets
(primarily as a result of the Conversion). For the fiscal years ended June 30,
1993, 1994 and 1995 and the six months ended December 31, 1995 and 1996; (i)
the interest rate spread varied between 1.45% and 1.77%; (ii) operating
expenses varied between 1.52% to 1.67% of average assets; (iii) return on
average assets varied from 0.36% to 0.54% of average assets; and (iv) return
on average equity varied between 5.9% to 17.8%.
33
<PAGE>
Peer Group Analysis. Trident evaluated Sentinel's strengths and weaknesses
by comparing the financial performance of Sentinel to that of the following
groups of OTS-regulated thrift institutions insured by the SAIF the "OTS peer
groups": (i) all United States institutions; (ii) all institutions in the
Midwest; (iii) all Missouri institutions; (iv) all United States institutions
with total assets between $0 million and $250 million; and (v) Midwest
institutions with total assets between $0 million and $250 million (the
"Aggregates"). This analysis compared a number of Sentinel's historical
financial ratios to those of the Aggregates, including but not limited to: (i)
the balance sheet composition as a percentage of total assets at September 30,
1995; (ii) the loan portfolio as a percentage of total assets at September 30,
1995; (iii) the investment portfolio as a percentage of total assets at
September 30, 1995; and (iv) asset quality at September 30, 1995. Trident also
compared Sentinel's growth rates between December 31, 1992 and September 30,
1995, its yields on assets and costs of liabilities and its income and expense
data for 1994 and the nine months ended September 30, 1995 to those of the
Aggregates.
This comparison showed, among other things, for the eleven months ended
September 30, 1995: (i) the compound annual growth rate of deposits for
Sentinel was -3.8% whereas the same rate for the OTS peer groups ranged from
1.5% to 5.2%; and (ii) the compound annual growth rate in assets for Sentinel
was 1.4% whereas the same rate for OTS peer groups ranged from 3.3% to 13.0%.
At September 30, 1995: (i) Sentinel's loan portfolio represented 51.5% of
assets whereas the OTS peer groups ranged from 53.1% to 67.7% of assets;
(ii) the equity capital to total assets ratio was 6.4% for Sentinel and
between 7.2% and 10.8% for the OTS peer groups; (iii) assets per employee were
$4.4 million for Sentinel and ranged between $3.0 million and $4.9 million for
the OTS peer groups; and (iv) the non-performing assets to total assets ratio
was 0.01% for Sentinel and ranged between 0.50% and 1.18% for the OTS peer
groups. For the calendar year 1994 and the nine months ended September 30,
1995: (i) the interest rate spread was 1.68% and 1.68%, respectively, for
Sentinel and from 2.28% to 3.31%, respectively for the OTS peer groups (ii)
the operating expense to average asset ratio was 1.68% and 1.56%,
respectively, for Sentinel, and 1.52% to 2.52%, respectively for the OTS peer
groups; and (iii) the non-interest income to average assets ratio was 0.29%
and 0.21%, respectively, for Sentinel 0.39% to 0.64%, respectively for the OTS
peer groups. For the three calendar years ending with December 31, 1995 and
the nine months ended September 30, 1995: (i) the return on average assets
ratio ranged between 0.37% and 0.66% for Sentinel and between 0.53% and 1.09%
for the OTS peer groups. Based on an analysis of the above factors among other
things, Sentinel generally exhibited slower growth, higher liquidity and lower
profitability than the OTS peer groups.
Valuation of Sentinel. Trident estimated the fair market value of Sentinel
in an acquisition context. In valuing Sentinel, Trident considered three
different approaches to value: the asset approach, the income approach and the
market approach.
The asset approach considers the market value of a company's assets and
liabilities, as well as any intangible value the company may have. Trident
estimated Sentinel's net asset value by adjusting the carrying value of its
assets and liabilities to reflect current market values (rather than
liquidation values). In addition, the net asset value of Sentinel was adjusted
downward based on an estimate of the impact of the expected assessment to
recapitalize the SAIF and estimated transaction and other costs. Finally,
Trident increased Sentinel's net asset value for the expected reversal of
previously accrued taxes and for the assumed exercise of outstanding options
to purchase Sentinel Common Stock. Based on the adjustments discussed above,
Trident estimated Sentinel's fully-diluted net asset value to be approximately
$10.7 million or $18.97 per share. After determining Sentinel's net asset
value, Trident added an intangible premium to reflect the estimated value of
its customer relationships. According to the asset approach, the total value
of Sentinel is the sum of its net asset value and its intangible value. Based
on a branch purchase methodology and intangible ("core deposit") premiums
observed in the market for thrift acquisitions, as well as Trident's knowledge
of Sentinel, Trident applied premiums equal to 3% and 5% of core deposits to
Sentinel's estimated fully-diluted net asset value. Using the asset approach,
Trident established a reference range of $25.50 to $29.75 per share of
Sentinel Common Stock.
Trident also used an income approach in its valuation of Sentinel by
capitalizing Sentinel's previous 12 months, earnings (adjusted to exclude non-
recurring income) plus merger cost saving of 35% to 50% as a result
34
<PAGE>
of an assumed acquisition of Sentinel (the "normalized earnings"). The
normalized earnings were capitalized at rates of 10%, 11% and 12%. The
capitalization rates chosen were estimates of the required rates of return for
holders or prospective holders of shares of financial institutions similar to
Sentinel, based on a number of factors, including prevailing interest rates,
the pricing ratios of publicly traded financial institutions, the financial
condition and operating results of Sentinel, as well as Trident's general
knowledge of valuation, the securities markets, and acquisition values in
other mergers of financial institutions. Trident adjusted the resulting values
to reflect the expected assessment to recapitalize the SAIF, the recovery of
previously accrued taxes, and certain merger-related expenses. Using the
income approach, Trident established a reference range of $16.00 to $23.25 per
share of Sentinel Common Stock.
In using the market approach, Trident analyzed certain median pricing ratios
(e.g., price to book value, price to tangible book value, price to reported
earnings, price to assets, and the premium paid over tangible book value as a
percentage of core deposits) resulting from selected completed thrift merger
transactions, as well as recently announced pending transactions. In applying
the market approach, Trident considered the pricing ratios for the following
groups of thrift merger transactions: (i) all pending thrift merger
transactions (50 transactions); (ii) all pending thrift mergers announced
during the 90 days prior to March 15, 1996 (the date of the market data) (15
transactions); (iii) all pending thrift mergers involving thrifts located in
the Midwest (19 transactions); (iv) all pending thrift mergers involving
thrifts located in Missouri (two transactions); (v) all pending thrift mergers
in which the aggregate consideration was between $12 million and $18 million
(eight transactions); (vi) all pending thrift mergers in which the target
thrift had assets between $100 million and $250 million (nine transactions);
(vii) all pending thrift mergers in which the target thrift had a return on
assets of between 0.25% and 0.50% (eight transactions); (viii) all pending
thrift mergers in which the target thrift had a return on equity of between 5%
and 7% (nine transactions); (ix) all pending thrift mergers in which the
target thrift had a tangible equity ratio of between 6% and 8% of assets (nine
transactions); and (x) all pending thrift mergers in which the target thrift
had a nonperforming assets to assets ratio of between 0.00% and 0.50% (26
transactions). Trident also considered the pricing ratios for 14 pending or
completed thrift merger transactions in which the target thrift was of similar
size and capital structure as Sentinel, and in which the target thrift had
similar profitability and asset quality. Trident then performed a comparison
of a number of financial ratios for Sentinel to those of the target thrift
institutions. Based on Sentinel's financial condition and results of
operations, as well as other factors, relative to the groups of thrift mergers
noted above, Trident chose ranges of pricing ratios to apply to Sentinel.
Trident chose price to book value ratios of 120% to 130%, resulting in per
share values of $25.75 to $27.75; price to tangible book value ratios of 120%
to 130%, resulting in per share values of $25.75 to $27.75; price to earnings
multiples of 16.0 to 20.0 times earnings, resulting in per share values of
$21.50 to $27.00; price to assets ratios of 8% to 10%, resulting in per share
values of $23.50 to $29.50; and premiums over tangible book value as a
percentage of core deposits of 2% to 4%, resulting in per share values of
$26.00 to $30.75. Based on these derived ranges of value, Trident established
a reference range of $24.00 to $28.00 per share using the market approach.
Trident then reviewed the results from the three approaches, and after
consideration of all relevant facts, reconciled the acquisition values
generated by each approach and determined a final range of $23.00 to $27.00
per share for the acquisition value of Sentinel. Trident did not apply
specific weights to the three individual approaches, but rather applied its
judgment and experience in determining the final range of value for Sentinel.
Trident gave less consideration to the income approach given the large
disparity between this approach and the values derived under the asset and
market approaches. Trident's analysis suggested that, in addition to cost
savings, an acquiror would have to make significant changes to the composition
of Sentinel's assets and liabilities to improve Sentinel's level of earnings.
Although such changes could have been assumed in the income approach, they
would have been very subjective. Therefore, Trident chose not to make such
assumptions and instead decided to rely less on the income approach. However,
the low values derived under the income approach placed downward pressure in
estimating the final range of value for Sentinel because ultimately, the value
of a company is tied to its level of future earnings contribution. On March
22, 1996, the value of the Merger Consideration was $26.33 based on the
previous day's closing price of Roosevelt Common Stock ($18.19 per share),
which was near the high end of the final range of value.
35
<PAGE>
The following is a brief summary of the Merger Analysis and Due Diligence
Report presented to the Sentinel Board on March 22, 1996:
Summary of Proposed Transaction. Trident presented a summary of the
financial terms of the Merger. Trident also compared the pricing ratios for
the Merger with the median pricing ratios for the selected groups of pending
thrift mergers and acquisitions used in the market approach. On March 22, 1996
the value of the merger consideration of $26.33 represented: (i) a price to
book value ratio of 128.7%; (ii) a price to tangible book value ratio of
128.7%; (iii) a price to last twelve months earnings ratio of 22.7x; (iv) a
price to assets ratio of 9.7%; and (v) a premium over tangible book value
ratio of 2.7%. The selected groups of pending thrift mergers and acquisitions
exhibited median pricing ratios equal to; (i) 131.9% of book value; (ii)
141.8% of tangible book value; (iii) 20.2x earnings; (iv) 14.1% of assets; and
(v) a 5.8% premium over tangible book value. In comparison to mergers of other
thrift institutions, Trident concluded that the financial terms of the Merger
were below average based on book value measures, above average based on
earnings, below average based on assets and below average in terms of premiums
over tangible book value.
Review of Due Diligence Examination of Roosevelt. Trident presented a
summary of its on-site due diligence examination of Roosevelt. Roosevelt's
historical balance sheets and income statements were presented, along with a
variety of financial ratios that analyzed Roosevelt's financial condition and
operating results through December 31, 1995. Trident discussed Roosevelt's
current operating strategy, strengths and weaknesses, peer group comparisons,
profitability, dividends, financial condition, loan portfolio composition,
asset quality, loan loss reserve coverage, stock price, growth, Roosevelt's
previous mergers and acquisitions, recent regulatory examinations of
Roosevelt, recent analysts' reports on Roosevelt, and other issues. Trident
did not establish any valuation or reference range for Roosevelt. Trident
reported that during its investigation Trident did not discover any conditions
that would prevent it from rendering its fairness opinion to the Sentinel
Board. As discussed above, Trident relied, without independent verification,
upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other
information provided by Roosevelt.
Roosevelt's Stock Pricing. Trident examined the trading of activity of
Roosevelt Common Stock between March 20, 1995 and March 19, 1996, and compared
the performance of Roosevelt's Common Stock to the S&P 500 index and to an
index of all actively-traded thrifts published by SNL Securities, LP. Trident
also compared Roosevelt and the pricing of its common stock to median pricing
ratios for twelve actively-traded thrifts with financial characteristics
similar to Roosevelt, other actively-traded Midwest thrifts, actively-traded
thrifts with assets between $5.0 billion and $15.0 billion and all actively-
traded thrifts as of March 19, 1996. On March 19, 1996, Roosevelt Common Stock
closed at $18.19 per share, which represented 171.6% of book value, 182.3% of
tangible book value and 18.0 times the last twelve months' reported earnings.
At that date, Roosevelt Common Stock was generally trading above industry
averages on book value measures and reported earnings. These pricing levels
reflected Roosevelt's below-average capital levels and reduced profitability
during the last twelve months due to several large non-recurring charges.
However, after adjusting earnings to exclude the non-recurring charges,
Roosevelt Common Stock was trading at comparable levels to industry averages.
The summaries of Trident's Valuation Report, Merger Analysis and Due
Diligence Report, and opinion set forth above reflect all the material
analyses, factors and assumptions considered by Trident and the material
valuation methodologies used by Trident in arriving at its opinion as to
fairness described above. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial or summary description.
Trident believes that its analyses and the summary set forth above must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, without
considering all of the analyses, or all of the above summary, without
considering all factors and analyses, would create an incomplete view of the
processes underlying the analyses set forth in Trident's reports and its
opinion. Therefore, the ranges of valuations resulting from any single
analysis described above should not be taken to be Trident's view of the
actual value of Sentinel or the combined company. In performing its analyses,
Trident made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance,
general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are
beyond the control of Sentinel and Roosevelt. The results of the specific
analyses performed by Trident may differ from Sentinel's actual values
36
<PAGE>
or actual future results as a result of changing economic conditions, changes
in company strategy and policies, as well as a number of other factors. Such
analyses were prepared to provide valuation guidance solely as part of
Trident's overall valuation analysis and the determination of the fairness of
the consideration to be received by Sentinel's stockholders, and were provided
to the Sentinel Board in connection with the delivery of Trident's opinion.
The analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which
a company might actually be sold or the prices at which any securities may
trade at the present time or at any time in the future. In addition, as
described above, Trident's opinion and presentations to the Sentinel Board
were among the many factors taken into consideration by the Sentinel Board in
making its determination to approve the Merger Agreement.
Trident, as part of its investment banking business, is continually engaged
in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers
and acquisitions, negotiated underwriting, and valuations for corporate and
other purposes. Trident has extensive experience with the valuation of
financial institutions. The Sentinel Board selected Trident as its financial
advisor because of its previous experience with Trident, because Trident is a
nationally recognized investment banking firm specializing in financial
institutions and because of its substantial experience in transactions similar
to the Merger. Trident is not affiliated with either Sentinel or Roosevelt.
For its services as financial advisor, Sentinel paid Trident a retainer of
$7,500 and a fee of $10,000 upon the execution of the Merger Agreement. An
additional fee of $17,500 will be payable to Trident upon consummation of the
Merger. Sentinel has also agreed to reimburse Trident for its reasonable out-
of-pocket expenses and to indemnify Trident against certain liabilities,
including certain liabilities under federal securities laws.
EFFECTIVE TIME AND CLOSING DATE
The Company Merger will become effective at the time the certificate of
merger for such merger is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware and the Bank Merger will become effective at the time the articles of
combination of such merger are endorsed by the Secretary of the OTS. Such
filing and endorsement will occur only after the receipt of all requisite
regulatory approvals, the approval of the Merger Agreement by the requisite
vote of Sentinel's stockholders and the satisfaction or waiver of all other
conditions to the Merger. The closing of the Merger shall occur no later than
10:00 a.m. on the last business day of the first calendar month following the
satisfaction or waiver of all conditions and obligations precedent of
Roosevelt and Sentinel to consummate the Merger, or at another time agreed to
by Roosevelt and Sentinel (the "Closing Date").
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL, any holder of Sentinel Common Stock who
does not wish to accept the Merger Consideration may dissent from the Merger
and elect to have the fair value of his or her shares (exclusive of any
element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger)
judicially determined and paid in cash, provided that such stockholder
complies with the provisions of Section 262.
The following is a brief summary of the statutory procedures to be followed
by a holder of Sentinel Common Stock in order to dissent from the Merger and
perfect appraisal rights under the DGCL. This summary is not intended to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Section 262, the
text of which is attached as Appendix III to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus
and incorporated by reference herein.
If any holder of Sentinel Common Stock elects to exercise his or her right
to dissent from the Merger and demand appraisal, such stockholder must satisfy
each of the following conditions:
(i) such stockholder must deliver a written demand for appraisal of his
or her shares to Sentinel before the stockholder vote with respect to the
Merger Agreement (the written demand for appraisal must be in addition to
and separate from any proxy or vote against the Merger Agreement; neither
voting against, abstaining from voting nor failing to vote on the Merger
Agreement will constitute a demand for appraisal within the meaning of
Section 262);
37
<PAGE>
(ii) such stockholder must not vote in favor of the Merger Agreement (a
failure to vote will satisfy this requirement, but a vote in favor of the
Merger Agreement, by proxy or in person, or the return of a signed proxy
which does not specify a vote against approval and adoption of the Merger
Agreement or a direction to abstain, will constitute a waiver of such
stockholder's right of appraisal and will nullify any previously filed
written demand for appraisal); and
(iii) such stockholder must continuously hold such shares from the date
of the making of the demand through the Effective Time.
If any holder of Sentinel Common Stock fails to comply with any of these
conditions and the Merger occurs, he or she will be entitled to receive the
consideration provided in the Merger Agreement, and will have no appraisal
rights with respect to his or her shares of Sentinel Common Stock.
All written demands for appraisal should be addressed to Sentinel Financial
Corporation, 1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106, Attention: Craig
D. Laemmli, President, before the taking of the vote concerning the Merger
Agreement at the Special Meeting, and should be executed by, or on behalf of,
the holder of record. Such demand must reasonably inform Sentinel of the
identity of the stockholder and that such stockholder is thereby demanding
appraisal of his or her shares.
To be effective, a demand for appraisal must be executed by or for the
stockholder of record who held such shares on the date of making such demand,
and who continuously holds such shares through the Effective Time, fully and
correctly, as such stockholder's name appears on his stock certificate(s) and
cannot be made by the beneficial holder if he or she does not also hold the
shares of record. The beneficial holder, in such case, must have the
registered owner submit the required demand in respect of such shares.
If Sentinel Common Stock is owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, as by a
trustee, guardian or custodian, execution of a demand for appraisal should be
made in such capacity. If Sentinel Common Stock is owned of record by more
than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, such demand must
be executed by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent, including one of
two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a
stockholder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner or
owners and expressly disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, he or
she is acting as agent for the record owner. A record owner, such as a broker,
who holds Sentinel Common Stock as a nominee for others may exercise his or
her right of appraisal with respect to the shares held for one or more
beneficial owners, while not exercising such right for other beneficial
owners. In such case, the written demand should set forth the number of shares
as to which the record owner dissents. Where no number of shares is expressly
mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares of Sentinel Common
Stock in the name of such record owner.
Within ten days after the Effective Time, Roosevelt (as the surviving
corporation in the Merger) must give written notice that the Merger has become
effective to each former Sentinel stockholder who so filed a written demand
for appraisal and who did not vote in favor of the Merger Agreement. Any such
stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of
mailing of the notice, demand in writing from Roosevelt the appraisal of his
or her shares of Sentinel Common Stock. Within 120 days after the Effective
Time, but not thereafter, either Roosevelt or any holder of shares of Sentinel
Common Stock who has complied with the requirements of Section 262, may file a
petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the "Court of Chancery") demanding
a determination of the value of the shares of Sentinel Common Stock held by
all stockholders entitled to appraisal. Roosevelt does not presently intend to
file such a petition. Inasmuch as Roosevelt has no obligation to file such a
petition, the failure of a stockholder to do so within the period specified
could nullify such stockholder's previous written demand for appraisal. In any
event, at any time within 60 days after the Effective Time (or at any time
thereafter with the written consent of Roosevelt), any stockholder who has
demanded appraisal has the right to withdraw the demand and to accept payment
of the consideration provided in the Merger Agreement.
Within 120 days after the Effective Time, any stockholder who has complied
with the provisions of Section 262 to that point in time will be entitled to
receive from Roosevelt, upon written request, a statement setting
38
<PAGE>
forth the aggregate number of shares of Sentinel Common Stock not voted in
favor of the Merger Agreement and with respect to which demands for appraisal
have been received along with the aggregate number of holders of such shares.
Roosevelt must mail such statement to the stockholder within ten days of
receipt of such request.
If a petition for appraisal is duly filed by a stockholder and a copy
thereof is delivered to Roosevelt, Roosevelt will then be obligated within 20
days to provide the Court of Chancery with a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded an appraisal of
their shares and with whom agreement as to the value of such shares has not
been reached. After notice to such stockholders, the Court of Chancery is
empowered to conduct a hearing upon the petition to determine those
stockholders who have complied with Section 262 and who have become entitled
to appraisal rights thereunder. The Court of Chancery may require the
stockholders who demanded payment for their shares to submit their stock
certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency
of the appraisal proceedings, and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
After determination of the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court
of Chancery will appraise the shares of Sentinel Common Stock, determining
their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the Merger. When the value is so determined,
the Court will direct the payment by Roosevelt of such value, with interest
thereon, simple or compound, if the Court so determines, to the stockholders
entitled to receive the same, upon surrender to Roosevelt by such stockholders
of the certificates representing such Sentinel Common Stock.
In determining fair value, the Court of Chancery will take into account all
relevant factors, and may consider proof of value by any techniques or methods
which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and
otherwise admissible in court. Under Delaware law, the Court of Chancery must
consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature
of the enterprise and any other facts which could be ascertained as of the
date of the Merger that shed any light on future prospects of the merged
corporation.
Section 262 provides that fair value is to be "exclusive of any element of
value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger." The
Delaware Supreme Court has construed Section 262 to mean that "elements of
future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or
susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and are not the product of
speculation, may be considered." Stockholders who are considering seeking an
appraisal should bear in mind that the fair value of their shares of Sentinel
Common Stock determined under Section 262 could be more than, the same as or
less than the Merger Consideration, and that an opinion of an investment
banking firm as to fairness is not an opinion as to fair value under Section
262.
Costs of the appraisal proceeding may be assessed against the parties
thereto (i.e., Roosevelt and the stockholders participating in the appraisal
proceeding) by the Court of Chancery as the court deems equitable in the
circumstances. Upon the application of any stockholder, the Court of Chancery
may determine the amount of interest, if any, to be paid upon the value of the
stock of stockholders entitled thereto. Upon application of a stockholder, the
court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder
in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation,
reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged
pro rata against the value of all shares entitled to appraisal. Any
stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights will not be entitled, after the
Effective Time, to vote the stock subject to such demand for any purpose or to
receive payment of dividends or any other distribution with respect to such
shares (other than dividends or distributions, if any, payable to holders of
record as of a record date prior to the Effective Time) or to receive the
payment of the Merger Consideration. However, if no petition for an appraisal
is filed within 120 days after the Effective Time or if such stockholder
delivers to Roosevelt a written withdrawal of his demand for an appraisal and
an acceptance of the Merger, either within 60 days after the Effective Time or
thereafter with the written approval of Roosevelt, then the right of such
stockholder to an appraisal will cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no
appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery will be dismissed as to any
stockholder without the approval of the court, and such approval may be
conditioned upon such terms as the court deems just.
39
<PAGE>
Failure to comply strictly with these procedures may cause the stockholder
to lose his or her appraisal rights. Consequently, any stockholder who desires
to exercise his or her appraisal rights is urged to consult a legal advisor
before attempting to exercise such rights.
FRACTIONAL SHARES
No certificates or scrip representing fractional shares of Roosevelt Common
Stock will be issued upon the surrender for exchange of certificates
representing Sentinel Common Stock, no dividend or distribution of Roosevelt
will relate to any fractional shares, and such fractional share interests will
not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any rights of a stockholder of
Roosevelt. Each stockholder of Sentinel who otherwise would be entitled to a
fractional share of Roosevelt Common Stock in the Merger will receive a cash
payment in lieu thereof (without interest) in an amount determined by
multiplying (i) the closing sale price of one share of Roosevelt Common Stock
as reported on the Nasdaq National Market on the business day immediately
preceding the Effective Time by (ii) the fractional share interest to which
the holder would otherwise be entitled pursuant to the terms of the Merger
Agreement.
EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, an independent exchange
agent designated by Roosevelt (the "Exchange Agent") will deliver to each
Sentinel holder of record of a certificate or certificates, which immediately
prior to the Effective Time represented outstanding shares of Sentinel Common
Stock (the "Certificates"), a transmittal letter and instructions to be used
in surrendering Certificates in exchange for (i) certificates representing the
number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock into which their shares of Sentinel
Common Stock were converted pursuant to the Merger Agreement and (ii) a check
representing the amount of cash in lieu of fractional shares, if any, and
unpaid dividends and distributions, if any, which such stockholder has the
right to receive in respect of the Certificates surrendered in connection with
the Merger. No interest will be paid or accrued on the cash in lieu of
fractional shares or on the unpaid dividends and distributions, if any,
payable to holders of Sentinel Common Stock.
SENTINEL STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD NOT FORWARD THEIR SENTINEL STOCK CERTIFICATES
UNTIL THEY RECEIVE THE TRANSMITTAL LETTER AND INSTRUCTIONS.
Until such surrender and subject to the effect, if any, of applicable law,
the Certificates will as of the Effective Time represent ownership of the
number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock into which such shares were
converted in the Merger, and the holders will be entitled to all rights and
privileges of holders of Roosevelt Common Stock, except that holders of
Certificates will not be entitled to receive dividends or any other
distributions declared by Roosevelt until the Certificates are so surrendered.
Following surrender of the Certificates in accordance with the terms of the
Merger Agreement, the holders of newly issued Roosevelt certificates will be
paid, without interest, any dividends or other distributions with respect to
the shares of Roosevelt Common Stock the record date for which is after the
Effective Time (less any taxes that may have been imposed thereon).
Any Certificate representing shares of Roosevelt Common Stock to be issued
in a name other than that in which the Certificate is registered must be
properly endorsed and otherwise in proper form for transfer, and the holder
requesting such exchange must pay to the Exchange Agent in advance any
transfer or other taxes in connection therewith.
In the event any Certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the
mailing of an affidavit of that fact by the holder of such Certificate and the
posting of any bond required by Roosevelt or the Exchange Agent, Roosevelt or
the Exchange Agent will issue for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate,
the shares of Roosevelt Common Stock and deliver cash due to the holder of
such Certificate under the terms of the Merger Agreement.
40
<PAGE>
After the Effective Time, there will be no further transfers on the records
of Sentinel of the Certificates, and, if such Certificates are presented to
Roosevelt for transfer, they will be cancelled against delivery of
certificates for Roosevelt Common Stock.
After the Effective Time, holders of unsurrendered Certificates shall be
entitled to vote at any meeting of Roosevelt stockholders at which holders of
Roosevelt Common Stock are eligible to vote, regardless of whether such
holders have exchanged their Certificates.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
Set forth below are descriptions of interests of directors and executive
officers of Sentinel in the Merger in addition to their interests generally as
stockholders of Sentinel. The Sentinel Board was aware of these interests and
considered them in approving the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
Employment Agreements. At Closing, Roosevelt Bank will enter into an
employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement") with Craig D. Laemmli,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal, who
will assume the position of Vice President of Roosevelt Bank working at the
current or currently planned offices of Sentinel Federal in the Kansas City,
Missouri metropolitan area (for a six-month term at an annual salary of
$61,559, the same as his current salary). Pursuant to the Employment
Agreement, if Mr. Laemmli's employment is terminated during the term of such
agreement, whether voluntarily by Mr. Laemmli or by Roosevelt Bank for any
reason (other than for cause, as defined in the Employment Agreement), he will
be entitled to receive (i) payment of his salary for the remaining term of the
Employment Agreement plus (ii) an amount of cash equal to 299 percent of his
"base amount" of compensation (as defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code)
in two installments, the first such installment payable within 15 days after
the date of termination and the second payable on the first anniversary of the
date of termination (the "Termination Payment"). The amounts described in the
preceding sentence will be reduced to the extent necessary to prevent any
amount paid or benefit provided to Mr. Laemmli (including the amounts
described in the preceding sentence and any other payments or benefits
received by Mr. Laemmli in connection with a "change in control") from being
nondeductible by Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank for federal income tax purposes
pursuant to Section 280G of the Code. It is estimated that if paid, the amount
of the Termination Payment would be $162,644.
Upon execution and delivery of the Employment Agreement by Roosevelt Bank
and Mr. Laemmli, the Employment Agreement will replace and supersede in its
entirety the existing employment agreement, dated as of January 7, 1994,
between Mr. Laemmli and Sentinel and Sentinel Federal (the "1994 Agreement")
and any other agreement or similar arrangement to which Mr. Laemmli is a
party. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, however, if the substantive terms of
the form of the Employment Agreement agreed to by the parties to the Merger
Agreement at the time of execution of the Merger Agreement are modified in any
manner that would materially diminish the anticipated benefits of the
Employment Agreement to Mr. Laemmli, he and Roosevelt Bank will be under no
obligation to execute the Employment Agreement, and the 1994 Agreement will
remain in effect. In such event, under the 1994 Agreement, the consummation of
the Company Merger will constitute a "change in control," thereby entitling
Mr. Laemmli to receive, in cash, 299 percent of his "base amount" of
compensation (the same amount as the estimated amount of the Termination
Payment, as provided in the last sentence of the preceding paragraph),
provided that under the Merger Agreement, neither Roosevelt nor Roosevelt Bank
will be obligated to make any payment or provide any benefit under the 1994
Agreement or otherwise that would not be deductible for federal income tax
purposes pursuant to Section 280G of the Code.
Directors. For at least one year after the Effective Time, and for so long
thereafter as agreed to by Roosevelt Bank and the participating directors of
Sentinel, the directors of Sentinel who wish to do so may serve as regional
advisory directors of Roosevelt Bank with a retainer fee of $500 per month.
Indemnification; Insurance. Roosevelt has agreed that from and after the
Effective Time, it will indemnify, defend and hold harmless, to the fullest
extent permitted under Sentinel's certificate of incorporation and bylaws
(including provisions relating to the advancement of expenses incurred in the
defense of any litigation) and the
41
<PAGE>
DGCL, the present and former officers, directors and employees of Sentinel and
its subsidiaries against all liabilities, claims, losses, damages or judgments
or amounts paid in settlement with the approval of Roosevelt in connection
with any claim, action or suit arising out of actions or omissions occurring
at or prior to the Effective Time (including without limitation the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement) regardless of whether such
matter is asserted or claimed before or after the Effective Time. Roosevelt
has further agreed to use its reasonable best efforts, for a period of three
years after the Effective Time, to cause the persons serving as officers and
directors of Sentinel Federal immediately prior to the Effective Time to be
covered by single (one-time) premium tail coverage by Sentinel Federal's
current directors' and officers' liability insurance policy (provided that
Roosevelt may substitute therefor policies of at least the same coverage and
amounts containing terms and conditions which are not materially less
advantageous than such policy) with respect to acts or omissions occurring
prior to the Effective Time which were committed by such officers and
directors in their capacities as such; provided, however, that in no event
shall Roosevelt be required to expend more than 150% of the annual amount
currently extended by Sentinel Federal (the "Insurance Amount") to maintain or
procure such insurance coverage and further provided that if Roosevelt is
unable to maintain or obtain such insurance coverage, Roosevelt will use its
reasonable best efforts to obtain as much comparable insurance as is available
for the Insurance Amount.
EFFECT ON EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS OF SENTINEL
Employee Severance Benefits; Continuing Employees. Roosevelt Bank
anticipates retaining the employees of Sentinel Federal as employees of
Roosevelt Bank after the Effective Time, subject to the needs of Roosevelt
Bank and the qualifications of such employees. Those employees (other than
Craig D. Laemmli and possibly John C. Spencer, for the reasons discussed
below) who are not retained for at least six months after the Effective Time
will be offered a severance arrangement of (i) four weeks' pay plus (ii) an
additional week's pay for each year of service to Sentinel or any of its
subsidiaries. Pursuant to a letter agreement entered into between the parties
to the Merger Agreement subsequent to the date thereof, Roosevelt and
Roosevelt Bank have agreed that in the event that the employment of John C.
Spencer, Executive Vice President and Controller of Sentinel Federal, is
terminated more than six months after the Effective Time, Mr. Spencer will be
entitled to receive the severance arrangement described in the preceding
sentence reduced by any regular salary payments received by Mr. Spencer during
any period of employment with Roosevelt or Roosevelt Bank after the Effective
Time. If Mr. Spencer's employment is terminated less than six months after the
Effective Time, he will become entitled to receive the severance payments
described above without reduction for any salary received during any period of
employment with Roosevelt or Roosevelt Bank after the Effective Time.
Employees of Sentinel and its subsidiaries who continue in employment with
Roosevelt or any of its subsidiaries following the Effective Time shall be
credited for prior years of service with Sentinel and its subsidiaries for
purposes of eligibility and vesting (but not for the accrual of benefits)
under the benefit plans and policies of Roosevelt and its subsidiaries
(including, without limitation, vacation and sick leave policies), there shall
be no exclusion from medical coverage as the result of pre-existing conditions
that were covered under the medical plan of Sentinel or any applicable
subsidiary thereof and such employees shall be entitled to participate on an
equitable basis in the same benefit plans and policies as are generally
available to Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank employees of similar rank and status
not later than January 1, 1998.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan. At the Effective Time, all shares of Sentinel
Common Stock under the control of the Sentinel Federal Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (the "ESOP") will be converted into the right to receive the
Merger Consideration. Each ESOP participant will receive a number of shares of
Roosevelt Common Stock equal to the number of shares of Sentinel Common Stock
allocated to his or her account multiplied by the Exchange Ratio. In addition,
with respect to shares of Roosevelt Common Stock received by the ESOP in
exchange for shares of Sentinel Common Stock not allocated to accounts of
participants, the trustees of the ESOP as soon as practicable after the
Effective Time (but not prior to the publication of financial results covering
at least 30 days of combined operations after the Merger) will liquidate the
number of shares of such Roosevelt Common Stock necessary to retire the
outstanding ESOP debt and distribute the remaining shares to participants in
the ESOP in proportion to the account balances of such participants as they
existed as of the Effective Time.
42
<PAGE>
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
In the Merger Agreement, each of Sentinel and Roosevelt has made certain
representations and warranties relating to, among other things, the parties'
respective organization, capitalization, qualification to do business and
compliance with applicable law, authority relative to the Merger Agreement,
the timely filing of all regulatory reports, reliability of financial
statements, taxes, employee arrangements and benefits, Community Reinvestment
Act compliance, the truth and accuracy of information prepared and provided by
them in connection with the Merger and the absence of certain legal
proceedings and other events, including material adverse changes in the
parties' business, financial condition, operations or assets. For detailed
information on such representations and warranties, see Articles II and III of
the Merger Agreement attached hereto as Appendix I.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
The respective Obligations of Roosevelt, Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel and
Sentinel Federal to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or
waiver at or prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions: (i) the
Merger Agreement shall have been approved by the stockholders of Sentinel;
(ii) all requisite approvals of the Merger Agreement shall have been received
from the OTS and all other applicable regulatory authorities, if any, without
the imposition of any condition which differs from conditions customarily
imposed by such regulatory authorities in orders approving acquisitions of the
type contemplated by the Merger Agreement and compliance with which would
materially diminish the reasonably anticipated benefits of the merger to
Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank, and all applicable waiting periods
shall have expired; (iii) the Registration Statement shall have been declared
effective and shall not be subject to a stop order or any threatened stop
order; (iv) neither Roosevelt, Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel nor Sentinel Federal
shall be subject to any order, decree or injunction of a court or agency of
competent jurisdiction which enjoins or prohibits the consummation of the
Merger; (v) Roosevelt and Sentinel shall have received, from counsel or
independent certified accountants mutually acceptable to them, an opinion to
the effect that, among other things, the Merger will constitute a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Code and that no gain
or loss will be recognized by Roosevelt, Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel or Sentinel
Federal, or by the stockholders of Sentinel (except in connection with the
receipt of cash in lieu of a fractional share of Roosevelt Common Stock); and
(vi) the shares of Roosevelt Common Stock to be issued in the Merger and to be
reserved for issuance upon the exercise of Sentinel Stock Options after the
Merger shall have been approved for listing on the Nasdaq National Market,
subject to official notice of issuance. For additional information, see
Section 6.1 of the Merger Agreement attached hereto as Appendix I.
In addition, the obligations of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal to consummate
the Merger are subject to the satisfaction by Roosevelt or waiver by Sentinel
of the following conditions: (i) the representations and warranties of
Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank contained in the Merger Agreement shall be true
and correct as of the date of the Merger Agreement and as of the Effective
Time (as though made and as of the Effective Time except (A) to the extent
such representations and warranties are by their express provisions made as of
a specific date, (B) for the effect of the transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement and (C) where the failure to be true and correct would not
have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, assets, deposit
liabilities, results of operations, or business (collectively the "Condition")
of Roosevelt and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole) and Sentinel and Sentinel
Federal shall have received a certificate of the president and chief executive
officer of Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank to that effect; (ii) Roosevelt and
Roosevelt Bank shall have performed in all material respects all obligations
required to be performed by them under the Merger Agreement prior to the
Effective Time and Sentinel and Sentinel Federal shall have received a
certificate of the president and chief executive officer of Roosevelt and
Roosevelt Bank to that effect; (iii) Sentinel and Sentinel Federal shall have
received an opinion from counsel to Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank dated the
Closing Date regarding certain legal matters; and (iv) certificates for the
number of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock and cash for fractional share
interests necessary to effectuate the exchange of Sentinel Common Stock for
the Merger Consideration shall have been delivered to the Exchange Agent. For
additional information, see Section 6.2 of the Merger Agreement attached
hereto as Appendix I.
43
<PAGE>
In addition, the obligations of Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank to consummate
the Merger are subject to the satisfaction by Sentinel or waiver by Roosevelt
of the following conditions: (i) the representations and warranties of
Sentinel and Sentinel Federal contained in the Merger Agreement shall be true
and correct as of the date of the Merger Agreement and as of the Effective
Time (as though made on and as of the Effective Time except (A) to the extent
such representations and warranties are by their express provisions made as of
a specific date, (B) for the effect of the transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement and (C) where the failure to be true and correct would not
have a material adverse effect on the Condition of Sentinel and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole) and Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank shall have
received a certificate of the president and chief executive officer of
Sentinel and Sentinel Federal to that effect; (ii) Sentinel and Sentinel
Federal shall have performed in all material respects all obligations required
to be performed by them under the Merger Agreement prior to the Effective Time
and Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank shall have received a certificate of the
president and chief executive officer of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal to that
effect; (iii) Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank shall have received an opinion from
counsel to Sentinel and Sentinel Federal dated the Closing Date regarding
certain legal matters; (iv) simultaneous with the execution and delivery of
the Merger Agreement (and in the case of any person who becomes a director of
Sentinel after the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, promptly
upon becoming such a director) each of the directors of Sentinel shall have
executed and delivered to Roosevelt a Voting Agreement in the form attached to
the Merger Agreement as Exhibit A; (v) Sentinel and Sentinel Federal shall
have obtained all consents and approvals (other than regulatory approvals)
required to be obtained in connection with the Merger other than those which,
individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on
the Condition of Roosevelt as the surviving corporation; (vi) Roosevelt shall
have received a letter from its independent accountants to the effect that the
Merger will qualify for pooling of interests accounting treatment; (vii)
Roosevelt shall have received from the "affiliates" of Sentinel certain
letters with respect to the resale of shares of Roosevelt Common Stock
received by them in the Merger; and (viii) the Supervisory Agreement, dated
December 20, 1989, between Sentinel Federal and the OTS shall have been
terminated. For additional information, see Section 6.3 of the Merger
Agreement attached hereto as Appendix I. See also "--Accounting Treatment."
There can be no assurance that the conditions to consummation of the Merger
will be satisfied or waived. In the event the conditions to either party's
obligations become impossible of satisfaction in any material respect, the
other party may elect to terminate the Merger Agreement. See "Waiver and
Amendment; Termination."
REGULATORY APPROVALS
The Merger is subject to the approval of the OTS. Roosevelt filed an
application for approval of the Merger with the OTS on May 13, 1996, and
received such approval on July 25, 1996.
It is a condition to the consummation of the Merger that all requisite
regulatory approvals be obtained without the imposition of any condition which
differs from conditions customarily imposed by the OTS in orders approving
acquisitions of the type contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The OTS
approval did not contain any such condition.
Under federal law a period of 15 days must expire following approval by the
OTS within which period the Department of Justice may file objections to the
Merger under the federal antitrust laws. The Department of Justice did not
file any objection during this period.
WAIVER AND AMENDMENT; TERMINATION
The Boards of Directors of Roosevelt and Sentinel may waive compliance with
any term, condition or provision of the Merger Agreement at any time.
Subject to applicable law, the Merger Agreement may be amended by action of
the Roosevelt and Sentinel Boards at any time before or after approval of the
Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Sentinel; provided, however, that
after approval by the stockholders of Sentinel, no amendment may (i) alter or
change the amount
44
<PAGE>
or kind of consideration to be received by holders of Sentinel Common Stock as
provided in the Merger Agreement or (ii) adversely affect the tax treatment to
Sentinel stockholders of the stock portion of the Merger Consideration. In
addition, Roosevelt may cause the Merger Agreement to be amended to change the
method of effecting the Merger, to the extent permitted by applicable law. No
such amendment, however, may (i) alter or change the amount or kind of the
Merger Consideration or the treatment of Sentinel Stock Options and Restricted
Sentinel Common Stock as set forth in the Merger Agreement, (ii) diminish the
benefits to be received by the directors, officers or employees of Sentinel
and Sentinel Federal as set forth in the Merger Agreement or in any other
agreements between the parties made in connection with the Merger Agreement,
(iii) materially impede or delay the consummation of the Merger or (iv)
adversely affect the tax treatment of Sentinel stockholders as a result of
receiving the Merger Consideration.
The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective
Time, whether prior to or after approval of the matters presented herein by
Sentinel's stockholders, (i) by mutual consent of the parties, (ii) by either
party if the Merger is not consummated by January 31, 1997 (provided that the
terminating party is not then in material breach of the Merger Agreement);
(iii) by either party if the required regulatory approvals are not obtained;
(iv) by either party if the required approval of Sentinel's stockholders is
not obtained (provided that the terminating party is not then in material
breach of the Merger Agreement); or (v) by either party if the other party has
materially breached any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set
forth in the Merger Agreement and has failed to, or cannot, cure in a timely
manner such breach after receiving written notice of such breach. In addition,
the Sentinel Board may terminate the Merger Agreement if in the exercise of
its good faith judgment in consultation with counsel it determines that
termination is warranted upon the occurrence of certain events, provided a
prior payment of $680,000 in cash has been made to Roosevelt. See "The
Merger--Waiver and Amendment; Termination." Sentinel has also agreed to pay
Roosevelt this amount in the event the Merger is not consummated and certain
events occur by September 22, 1997. See "The Merger--Expenses; Termination
Fee" and Section 7.2 of the Merger Agreement attached hereto as Appendix I.
Subject to certain exceptions, the representations, warranties and
agreements of the parties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not survive
the Effective Time, and shall be terminated and extinguished at such time.
From and after the Effective Time, neither of the parties shall have any
liability to the other on account of any breach or failure of any of the
representations, warranties and agreements in the Merger Agreement, subject to
certain exceptions.
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER
Each of Roosevelt and Sentinel has agreed, with respect to it and its
subsidiaries, that, prior to the Effective Time, it will (i) conduct its
business only in the ordinary and usual course consistent with past practices,
and (ii) use its best efforts to maintain and preserve its business
organization, employees and advantageous business relationships and retain the
services of its officers and key employees.
In addition, Sentinel has agreed that, prior to the Effective Time, it and
its subsidiaries will not, without the prior written consent of Roosevelt: (i)
declare or pay any dividends or other distributions on its capital stock
(other than certain inter-company dividends), (ii) enter into or amend any
employment or similar agreement or arrangement, materially modify any employee
benefit plan or security acquisition loans relating thereto or grant any
salary or wage increase, other than increases (A) consistent with past
practice or required by applicable law or contract, (B) as provided for in
Section 5.8 of the Merger Agreement and (C) as to which Roosevelt does not
disapprove after written notification by Sentinel; (iii) except as required in
fulfillment of the fiduciary duties of the Sentinel Board (as determined in
consultation with counsel), authorize, recommend, propose or announce an
intention to authorize, so recommend or propose, or enter into an agreement in
principle with respect to, any merger, consolidation or business combination
(other than the Merger), any acquisition of a material amount of assets or
securities, any disposition of a material amount of assets or securities or
any release or relinquishment of any material contractual rights; (iv) propose
or adopt any amendments to its certificate of incorporation or other charter
document or bylaws, other than as required by law or regulation; (v) issue or
sell any shares of its capital stock other than pursuant to options
outstanding on the date of the Merger Agreement, or effect any stock
45
<PAGE>
split or otherwise change its capitalization as it existed on the date of the
Merger Agreement; (vi) purchase, exchange or otherwise acquire or dispose of
any shares of its capital stock; (vii) except as provided for in the Merger
Agreement or in honor of existing contractual obligations, enter into,
increase or modify certain loan or credit commitments, without first
consulting with Roosevelt or unless Roosevelt does not object after
notification by Sentinel, as applicable, or enter into any agreement or engage
in any transaction which reasonably could be construed as materially affecting
the asset/liability management or interest rate risk management position of
Sentinel or Sentinel Federal; (viii) directly or indirectly (A) initiate,
solicit or encourage any discussions or proposals relating to the disposition
of any significant portion of the business or assets of Sentinel or any
subsidiary thereof or the acquisition of 10% or more of the shares of any
class of capital stock of Sentinel or any subsidiary thereof or the merger of
Sentinel or any subsidiary thereof with any person (other than Roosevelt) or
any similar transaction or (B) except as required in fulfillment of the
fiduciary duties of the Sentinel Board, and in consultation with outside
counsel, provide any such person with information or assistance or negotiate
with any such person with respect to any such transaction; (ix) take any
action that would (A) materially impede or delay the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or the ability of Roosevelt
or Sentinel to obtain any required approval of any regulatory authority or to
perform its covenants and agreements under the Merger Agreement, (B) prevent
the Merger from qualifying as a pooling of interests for accounting purposes
or (C) prevent the Company Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code or the Bank Merger from
qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) or
(D) of the Code; (x) other than in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice, incur any indebtedness for borrowed money, assume,
guarantee, endorse or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible or
liable for the obligations of any other individual, corporation or other
entity; or (xi) agree in writing or otherwise take any of the foregoing
actions or engage in any activity, enter into any transaction or take or omit
to take any other act which would make any of the representations and
warranties of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal in the Merger Agreement untrue or
incorrect in any material respect if made anew after engaging in such
activity, entering into such transaction or taking or omitting such other act.
EXPENSES; TERMINATION FEE
All expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the
consummation of the Merger are to be paid by the party incurring such
expenses, except that Roosevelt will pay all printing and mailing expenses and
filing fees associated with this Proxy Statement/Prospectus and all filings
with the Regulatory Authorities for approval of the Merger Agreement.
If the Merger is not consummated by September 22, 1997 and a Fee Event (as
defined below) occurs prior thereto, Sentinel has agreed to pay Roosevelt on
demand a fee of $680,000 in recognition of the expenses of, and other
opportunities foregone by, Roosevelt in connection with the Merger Agreement.
A Fee Event shall occur if: (i) any person other than Roosevelt or an
affiliate of Roosevelt acquires beneficial ownership of 25% or more of the
then-outstanding shares of Sentinel Common Stock; (ii) without having received
Roosevelt's prior written consent, Sentinel or any of its affiliates enters
into an agreement to engage in, or the Sentinel Board recommends that
Sentinel's stockholders approve or accept, an Acquisition Transaction (as
defined below) with any person other than Roosevelt or any of its
subsidiaries; or (iii) Sentinel or any of its subsidiaries or stockholders
receives a proposal from a third party to engage in an Acquisition Transaction
and after such proposal (A) Sentinel willfully breaches the Merger Agreement
entitling Roosevelt to terminate the Merger Agreement, (B) Sentinel
stockholders do not approve the Merger Agreement at the Special Meeting, (C)
the Special Meeting is not held or is canceled prior to termination of the
Merger Agreement for reasons other than the fault of Roosevelt or (D) the
Sentinel Board withdraws or modifies its recommendation with respect to the
Merger Agreement in a manner adverse to Roosevelt. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Sentinel will not be obligated to pay such termination fee if,
prior to a Fee Event, the Merger Agreement is terminated by mutual consent of
the parties, or by Sentinel because a required regulatory approval is denied,
or Roosevelt commits a material breach of a representation, warranty, covenant
or agreement set forth in the Merger Agreement which Roosevelt fails to cure
in a timely manner after receiving written notice of such breach.
46
<PAGE>
Under the Merger Agreement, each of the following will be deemed an
Acquisition Transaction: (i) a merger or consolidation or similar transaction
involving Sentinel or Sentinel Federal; (ii) the purchase, lease or other
acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets of Sentinel or any if
its subsidiaries; or (iii) the purchase or other acquisition (including by way
of merger, consolidation, share exchange or otherwise) of securities
representing 10% or more of the voting power of Sentinel or Sentinel Federal.
The term "Acquisition Transaction" does not include any internal merger
involving only Sentinel Financial and or its subsidiaries.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
Roosevelt has not yet decided whether to account for the Merger under the
purchase method or the pooling of interests method. The decision will be based
on whether Roosevelt decides to issue shares in connection with the Merger
from authorized but unissued shares, or to acquire shares in the open market
for issuance in connection with the Merger. If shares are acquired in the open
market, the pooling method will not be available. In addition, in order to
utilize the pooling method, Roosevelt would be required prior to the
consummation of the Merger, to rescind its existing stock repurchase plan,
which is described in Note 18 to the "Financial Statements of Roosevelt Group,
Inc.--Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report for
the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995." Under the purchase method,
which accounts for a business combination as the acquisition of one enterprise
by another, the value of the company's shares issued in the transaction is
included in stockholders' equity and any of such amount in excess of net fair
values of tangible and identifiable intangible assets of the acquired company
is treated as an intangible asset on the acquiring company's financial
statements. Under the pooling method, the financial statements of the
combining enterprises are combined as if the two were and had been a single
entity and no intangible asset is created.
THE BANK MERGER AGREEMENT
In connection with the Merger, Roosevelt Bank and Sentinel Federal will
execute an agreement pursuant to which Sentinel Federal will merge with
Roosevelt Bank (the "Bank Merger Agreement"). Under the Bank Merger Agreement,
the Bank Merger will occur at the date and time specified on the endorsement
of the articles of combination that will be filed with the OTS by the parties
to the Merger Agreement as soon as practicable after the satisfaction or
waiver of the conditions of each party to effect the Merger. The name of the
surviving institution will be "Roosevelt Bank."
RESALES OF ROOSEVELT COMMON STOCK BY AFFILIATES
The shares of Roosevelt Common Stock to be issued in the Merger will be
registered under the Securities Act and will be freely transferable under the
Securities Act, except for shares issued to any stockholder who may be deemed
to be an "affiliate" of Roosevelt or Sentinel for purposes of Rule 145 under
the Securities Act as of the date of the Special Meeting. Affiliates of
Roosevelt or Sentinel may not sell their shares of Roosevelt Common Stock
acquired in connection with the Merger except pursuant to an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act covering such shares or in
compliance with Rule 145 or another applicable exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act. Persons who may be deemed to be affiliates
of Roosevelt or Sentinel generally include individuals or entities that
control, are controlled by or are under common control with Roosevelt or
Sentinel, and may include certain officers and directors of Roosevelt and
Sentinel as well as certain principal stockholders of Roosevelt and Sentinel.
SEC guidelines regarding qualifying for the pooling of interests method of
accounting also limit sales by affiliates of Roosevelt or Sentinel in the
Merger. SEC guidelines indicate that the pooling of interests method of
accounting generally will not be challenged on the basis of sales by
affiliates if they do not dispose of any of the shares of either combining
company they owned prior to the consummation of a merger or shares of the
surviving company received in connection with a merger during the period
beginning 30 days before the merger and ending when financial results covering
at least 30 days of post- merger operations of the surviving company have been
published.
47
<PAGE>
It is a condition to Roosevelt's obligation to consummate the Merger that
each person who may be deemed an affiliate (for purposes of Rule 145 and for
purposes of qualifying the Merger for pooling of interests accounting
treatment) of Sentinel execute and deliver to Roosevelt a written agreement
intended to ensure compliance with the Securities Act and to ensure that the
Merger will qualify as a pooling of interests. See also "--Accounting
Treatment."
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
Set forth below is a discussion of federal income tax consequences of the
Merger to Roosevelt, Sentinel and Sentinel stockholders who are citizens or
residents of the United States. The following discussion constitutes the
opinion of Silver, Freedmont & Taff, L.L.P., counsel to Roosevelt, as to the
material federal income tax consequences of the Merger, as issued and
delivered to the Roosevelt Board. The discussion does not purport to be a
complete analysis or listing of all potential tax effects relevant to a
decision whether to vote in favor of approval of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby. Further, the discussion does not address
the tax consequences that may be relevant to a particular Sentinel stockholder
subject to special treatment under certain federal income tax laws, such as
dealers in securities, banks, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations,
non-United States stockholders, and persons who acquired their shares as
compensation, nor any consequences arising under the laws of any state,
locality or foreign jurisdiction. The discussion is based upon the Code,
Treasury regulations thereunder and administrative rulings and court decisions
as of the date hereof. All of the foregoing are subject to change and any such
change could affect the continuing validity of this discussion.
HOLDERS OF SENTINEL COMMON STOCK ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISERS AS
TO THE PARTICULAR EFFECT OF THEIR OWN PARTICULAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES ON
THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO THEM, AND ALSO TO THE
EFFECT OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER FEDERAL TAX LAWS.
Under current federal income tax law, and based upon assumptions and
representations of Roosevelt and Sentinel to be made as of the Effective Time,
and assuming that the Company Merger and the Bank Merger are each consummated
in the manner set forth in the Merger Agreement, the following material
federal income tax consequences would result:
(i) the Company Merger and the Bank Merger would each qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code;
(ii) no gain or loss would be recognized by Roosevelt, Roosevelt Bank,
Sentinel or Sentinel Federal by reason of the Company Merger or the Bank
Merger;
(iii) no gain or loss would be recognized by any Sentinel stockholder
upon the exchange of Sentinel Common Stock solely for Roosevelt Common
Stock in the Merger (except in connection with the receipt of cash in lieu
of a fractional share of Roosevelt Common Stock or in connection with the
exercise of dissenter's rights, as discussed below);
(iv) the aggregate tax basis of the Roosevelt Common Stock received by
each stockholder of Sentinel who exchanged Sentinel Common Stock for
Roosevelt Common Stock in the Merger would be the same as the aggregate tax
basis of the Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor
(subject to any adjustments required as the result of receipt of cash in
lieu of a fractional share of Roosevelt Common Stock);
(v) the holding period of the shares of Roosevelt Common Stock received
by a Sentinel stockholder in the Merger would include the holding period of
the Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor (provided that
such shares of Sentinel Common Stock were held as a capital asset by such
stockholder at the Effective Time);
(vi) cash received in the Merger by a Sentinel stockholder in lieu of a
fractional share interest of Roosevelt Common Stock or by a Sentinel would
be treated as having been received as a distribution in full payment in
exchange for the fractional share interest of Roosevelt Common Stock which
such stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive, and would qualify
as capital gain or loss (assuming the Sentinel
48
<PAGE>
Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor were held as a capital asset
by such stockholder at the Effective Time); and
(vii) a Sentinel stockholder who received only cash as a result of the
exercise of appraisal rights would realize gain or loss for federal income
tax purposes (determined separately as to each block of Sentinel Common
Stock exchanged) in an amount equal to the difference between (x) the
amount of cash received by such stockholder, and (y) such stockholder's tax
basis for the shares of Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in exchange
therefor, provided that the cash payment did not have the effect of the
distribution of a dividend. Any such gain or loss would be recognized for
federal income tax purposes and would be treated as capital gain or loss.
However, if the cash payment did have the effect of the distribution of a
dividend, the amount of taxable income recognized generally would equal the
amount of cash received; such income generally would be taxable as a
dividend; and no loss (or the recovery of such stockholder's tax basis for
the shares of Sentinel Common Stock surrendered in the exchange) generally
would be recognized by such stockholder. The determination of whether a
cash payment has the effect of the distribution of a dividend would be made
pursuant to the provisions and limitations of Section 302 of the Code,
taking into account the constructive stock ownership rules of Section 318
of the Code.
Roosevelt has received an opinion of Silver, Freedman & Taff, L.L.P.,
counsel to Roosevelt, in connection with the Registration Statement to the
effect that if the Merger were consummated on the date hereof, the Merger
would qualify as a reorganization under the Code with the consequences set
forth above. The opinion is subject to various assumptions and qualifications,
including that the Company Merger and the Bank Merger will be consummated in
the manner and in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement. However,
the financial accounting treatment of the transaction as a pooling of
interests or a purchase will not impact the tax consequences described above.
The opinion is based entirely upon the Code, regulations in effect or proposed
thereunder, current administrative rulings and practice and judicial
authority, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive
effect. Consummation of the Merger is conditioned upon the receipt by
Roosevelt and Sentinel of a closing tax opinion setting forth the same tax
consequences in the foregoing tax opinion. See "--Conditions to the Merger."
No ruling has been or will be requested from the Internal Revenue Service
("IRS"), including any ruling as to federal income tax consequences of the
Merger to Roosevelt, Sentinel or Sentinel stockholders. Unlike a ruling from
the IRS, an opinion of counsel or independent certified accountants is not
binding on the IRS. There can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a
position contrary to the positions reflected in such opinion or that such
opinion would be upheld by the courts if challenged.
NASDAQ LISTING
Roosevelt Common Stock currently is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. It
is a condition to consummation of the Merger that the Roosevelt Common Stock
to be issued to stockholders of Sentinel in the Merger and to be reserved for
issuance under the Sentinel Stock Options assumed by Roosevelt in the Merger
also will be approved for listing on the Nasdaq National Market. See "--
Conditions to the Merger."
MANAGEMENT AFTER THE MERGER
As of the Effective Time, the Boards of Directors of Roosevelt and Roosevelt
Bank will consist of the current members of such Boards, and the executive
officers of Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank will include the current executive
officers of Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank. Craig D. Laemmli, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Sentinel and Sentinel Federal will assume the
position of Vice President of Roosevelt Bank pursuant to an employment
agreement for a term of six months as described elsewhere in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus Statement. See "The Merger--Interest of Certain Persons."
In addition, for at least one year after the Effective Time, and for so long
thereafter as agreed to by Roosevelt Bank and the participating directors of
Sentinel, the directors of Sentinel who wish to do so may serve as regional
advisory directors of Roosevelt Bank for a retainer fee of $500 per month. See
"The Merger--Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger."
49
<PAGE>
BUSINESS OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
GENERAL
Roosevelt is a Delaware corporation which was organized in 1988 by Roosevelt
Bank, for the purpose of becoming a thrift institution holding company for the
Bank. The Bank is a federally chartered stock savings bank with 79 full
service offices. The Bank has 38 offices serving the St. Louis metropolitan
area, including Alton and Granite City, Illinois and nine offices serving the
Kansas City metropolitan area. The remaining 32 offices are located in
Staunton, Illinois and Pittsburgh, Kansas and the Missouri cities of
Hannibal(2), Springfield(3), Columbia, Union, Warrenton, St. James,
Washington, Sikeston, Dexter, Malden, Poplar Bluff, Hayti, Portageville, Cape
Girardeau, Mexico, Jefferson City, Trenton, Marshall, Sedalia, Clinton,
Maryville, St. Joseph, Nevada, Lamar, Joplin(2) and Kirksville. Incorporated
as a Missouri chartered mutual savings and loan in 1924, the Bank converted to
a federally chartered savings and loan in 1935. In 1987, the Bank became a
stock savings and loan and, one year later, converted to a stock savings bank,
changing its name to Roosevelt Bank, a federal savings bank.
Effective December 30, 1988, the Bank completed the holding company
reorganization of the Bank and the Company acquired all of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock of the Bank. The principal asset of the
Company is the outstanding stock of the Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary. The
Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol
"RFED".
Roosevelt's business consists primarily of attracting deposits from the
general public and using those deposits, together with borrowings and other
funds, to acquire real estate and consumer loans and mortgage-backed
securities, to perform loan servicing functions for others, and to provide
other retail banking and financial services to consumers.
The Company and the Bank are subject to examination and comprehensive
regulation and oversight by the OTS and by the FDIC. The Bank is further
subject to regulations of the FRB governing reserves required to be maintained
against transaction accounts. The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Des Moines,
which is one of the 12 regional banks constituting the Federal Home Loan Bank
System (the FHLB System) and its deposits are insured by the SAIF to the
maximum extent permitted by the FDIC.
Roosevelt's executive offices are located at 900 Roosevelt Parkway,
Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, and its telephone number is (314) 532-6200.
Unless otherwise indicated, references herein to Roosevelt or the Company
include the Bank and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
ROOSEVELT'S PHILOSOPHY AND OPERATING STRATEGY
The Company's philosophies regarding the evolution of the composition of its
balance sheet, risk avoidance techniques utilized during times of significant
market volatility and current operating strategies are discussed in the
following paragraphs of this section.
Occasionally, over the past ten years, some observers have inaccurately
compared Roosevelt to wholesale companies which, by design, avoided the retail
business. By contrast, Roosevelt's capital markets activities were a prudent
and disciplined reaction to conditions and opportunities within its retail
markets. Roosevelt's Management strongly endorses a continued growth of its
diversified, yet retail-based, operation.
Because Roosevelt dealt successfully with so much excess liquidity over the
past ten years, the Bank has developed a core competency related to managing
interest rate risk and capital market instruments. Unlike many in the capital
markets, Roosevelt has only dealt with derivatives and securities as risk
reducing tools. None of Roosevelt's activities with derivatives have been a
business in and of itself wherein speculation or pursuit of profit was the
goal. Relative to other bank's Roosevelt's expertise in this area has enabled
it to lower its overall risk profile.
50
<PAGE>
Roosevelt's current liquidity position and its abilities in the capital
markets stand as strengths which can support and enhance its current and
future retail efforts.
Dating back to 1986, there is a deeply rooted preference toward retail
banking in all of Roosevelt's operating policies. Reading the various policies
together, one can envision that Roosevelt's Management believes the ideal
balance sheet has virtually all assets being comprised of high quality loans
originated within the Bank's retail markets. Also, ideally, this asset base
would be financed almost exclusively with core retail deposits and equity.
ASSET COMPOSITION
During the late 1980's, Roosevelt's Management was preoccupied with the
transformation from a traditional thrift. Significant changes included
increasing capital, reducing exposure to the commercial real estate market,
reducing interest rate risk, expanding asset generation capability to other
than merely residential mortgages and enhancing the physical plant and
technology platform to compete more effectively in the retail arena.
In pursuit of the ideal balance sheet, Roosevelt was only equipped to
originate real estate mortgages. On the single-family portion of the business,
Roosevelt's competition was dominated by thrifts which were technically
insolvent. The operations of these competitors drove down available loan
yields. The only hope for profitability was dependent upon funding the asset
with very short-term liabilities in order to play the yield curve. These
competitors did engage in such rate speculation. The only alternative would
have been to close their company and to surrender their keys to the
government. Roosevelt's discipline prevented it from joining in on what was
believed to be unsafe and unsound practices.
At that time, Roosevelt's alternatives also included commercial mortgage
originations. A review of that market showed that borrowers were demanding,
and receiving, loan terms which included thin single-family type margins, no
recourse to the borrower and no requirement of a down payment or a real equity
contribution to their project. Within such scenarios, the best a lender could
have hoped for was getting their money back with a very small return relative
to the risk. Unfortunately, as often as not, many of the projects failed.
Without a significant down payment to protect, borrowers were only too happy
to give their "white elephant" to the bank. Without legal recourse to the
borrower, the bankers could do little more than turn their attention to hiring
crews of REO workout specialists.
Roosevelt abstained from this activity as well. It was viewed that making
such loans would have been tantamount to the granting of free call and put
options. If the project succeeded, the borrower could call the value away by
paying the loan back but keeping all of the profit. If the project failed, the
borrower could Put the underwater project back to the lender by not repaying
the loan, whose balance would then be much greater than the value of the
collateral. Roosevelt believes that viewing financial transactions in terms of
such an options perspective is a very good beginning to managing risk.
Roosevelt tries to avoid situations wherein the downside greatly exceeds the
potential upside in a given transaction.
The discussion above explains why Roosevelt was uninterested in growing its
balance sheet with mortgage loans regardless of whether the loans were backed
by single-family or commercial real estate. Such circumstances caused
Roosevelt's liquidity to grow. Also, significant declines in interest rates
during 1986 and after the October 1987 stock market crash caused significant
prepayment of a lot of the Bank's existing mortgages. Accordingly, liquidity
grew even more.
The challenge for Roosevelt was to find ways to invest the liquidity without
taking significant credit risk, without taking material interest rate risk and
still preserving at least some spread. Roosevelt found part of the answer in
its knowledge of the mortgage market.
It appeared that "Wall Street" was oblivious to mortgage prepayment risk
until the mid-to-late 1980's. The first acknowledgement by institutional
investors was merely one of panic and avoidance. With every
51
<PAGE>
announcement of huge losses at several Wall Street firms--the market abandoned
the purchase of mortgages. As prices fell relative to Treasurys, the yield
spreads widened substantially. Roosevelt merely acknowledged that its huge
build up in liquidity had occurred during a time of great investment
opportunity in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) which promised wide risk-
adjusted spreads.
The decision to invest a portion of that liquidity in MBS was not a
difficult leap to make. Accordingly, Roosevelt moved a lot of its liquidity
into MBS and ended up with an asset base comprised of fewer loans and more
securities than typical for a bank. With every passing month, the existing
asset base (comprised of both loans and securities) threw off additional
liquidity. Accordingly, the new liquidity was invested in more securities.
Unfortunately, Management did not see the mortgage origination market become
rational until after Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement
Act of 1989 ("FIRREA") created the Resolution Trust Corporation ("RTC") and,
accordingly, supplied the money to shut down the thrifts during 1990. By that
time, this process had caused Roosevelt's loans to represent only about 20% of
assets.
LIABILITY COMPOSITION
During this time, Roosevelt also had difficulty growing its retail deposits.
To attract a new household, the Bank needed a competitive checking account
product. Being competitive meant providing the services expected by the
typical customer. Roosevelt's physical plant and technology platform were
inadequate. Not enough branches had drive-up windows, the lobbies were too
small and the Bank did not have a single ATM.
During the late 1980's through about 1991, Roosevelt attacked these problems
aggressively by installing an entirely new data processing system and putting
ATM's in every branch, by remodeling a number of branches and trying to make
sure every location had a drive-up facility, and by actually closing a couple
of offices and building some entirely new facilities for the first time in
over ten years. While these steps helped competitiveness prospectively, they
did nothing to impact the position in 1991 wherein both the loan and the
deposit portfolios were smaller than management had wished.
During the 1992-1994 era, the Company quadrupled in size to over $8 billion.
Such activities gave the Bank even more opportunities to improve its physical
plant and technology platform. Management thought the merger and acquisition
opportunities were historically attractive and exerted great effort in making
the most of the opportunities. At one point, both the First Nationwide and the
Savings of America deposit acquisitions were nearly lost. However, being
nimble and flexible made the difference. Roosevelt conveyed a willingness to
accept entirely cash on the asset side of the transactions. Both of the
California companies found real value in the proposal because they were having
difficulty finding loan growth.
With those two transactions, deposits grew $1.3 billion. The $1.3 billion in
cash increased Roosevelt's excess liquidity position. Being risk averse and
preoccupied with acquisition integration, the Company did not try to
substantially increase its loan purchase/origination program in desperation.
Management felt that the assets were kept safe and available for future
opportunities by buying MBS.
While much of the growth during that period of time also came in the form of
whole companies, most of the companies had limited asset generation capability
and excess liquidity. Management did not mind such scenarios because it was
easier to see how profitability could be improved quickly. Also, such
characteristics helped Management to control asset quality during a period of
rapid acquisition growth. However, every acquisition seemed to move the Bank
further away from more typical loan-to-deposit or loan-to-asset ratios.
Everyone at Roosevelt today believes that the primary opportunity in
building high returns is the conversion of the lower margin securities into
higher margin relationship-based retail assets. Such is the focus of
Roosevelt's stand-alone business plan. Such would undoubtedly be the focus in
either a "merger-of-equals" transaction or in the motivations of a straight
forward acquiror. Management does not believe it should make material
investments in mortgage securities on a held-to-maturity basis, unless there
is an insufficient supply of loans with superior risk-return opportunities.
52
<PAGE>
At December 31, 1995, Roosevelt owned $3.4 billion of MBS held to maturity.
The monthly cash flows from this portfolio can fund a great deal of loan
growth. If loan volumes are sufficient, this portfolio will be on an immediate
and steady decline from here forward.
THE PAST AS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF THE FUTURE
At December 31, 1995, Roosevelt had invested $1.4 billion in MBS carried as
available for sale ("AFS"). This portfolio should be looked at as the Bank's
typical liquidity/securities portfolio. The size of such holdings is likely to
be relatively constant and not decline with an increased ability to originate
loans. This investment represented approximately 16% of total assets at
December 31, 1995. At a similar point in time, the five largest Missouri
commercial banks owned securities positions averaging more than 25% of total
assets. Accordingly, Roosevelt's Management does not believe that its
portfolio of securities carried as available for sale constitutes either an
unusual activity for a bank or an unusually large concentration for a bank of
Roosevelt's size.
Roosevelt's approach within the AFS portfolio is also similar to the goals
of other conservative banks in that it seeks to minimize both credit risk and
interest rate risk. Regarding credit risk, Roosevelt seeks only government
agency-backed, AAA-rated or AA-rated paper. Regarding interest rate risk,
Roosevelt seeks to maintain a weighted average duration within the overall
portfolio of less than six months. On both an outright dollars basis and as a
percentage of the AFS portfolio, Roosevelt has experienced less in the way of
market value adjustments to equity pursuant to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115 (SFAS 115) than most other banks.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Roosevelt has a very simple philosophy regarding interest rate risk (IRR).
First and foremost--Roosevelt tries to avoid IRR. By definition, Roosevelt
believes IRR is the extent to which an entity can be negatively impacted by a
change in interest rates. Accordingly, Roosevelt endeavors to maintain a
position wherein it will not suffer any material impact from 1) a parallel
rise in interest rates; 2) a parallel decline in interest rates; 3) a
steepening of the yield curve; or 4) a flattening of the yield curve.
It is appropriate to tie this concept of seeking to avoid interest risk with
the concept discussed earlier regarding Management's "ideal balance sheet." If
the assets were all retail home equity lines of credit, wherein the rates were
not capped and fluctuated with the Prime rate; and, all of the liabilities
were core retail deposits, made up exclusively of transaction accounts without
maturities--then Management believes that there would be very little IRR.
However, based upon its recent history, Roosevelt does not enjoy an ideal
balance sheet. Transaction accounts make up only about 25% of total deposits.
Management is currently trying to grow its transaction account base as rapidly
as can be deemed prudent. Acquiring or merging with companies with large
amounts of transaction accounts is considered to be a prudent supplementary
strategy as long as the prices of the merger partners are not excessive.
Also, Roosevelt's asset base has a relatively small balance of home equity
lines of credit. In fact, Roosevelt's limited capabilities historically to
originate short term retail loans forced the Bank to buy mortgage- and asset-
backed securities to supplement its balance sheet.
WHAT ROOSEVELT BUYS AND WHEN
When looking for opportunities in the securities market, Roosevelt has tried
to follow a "keep it simple" strategy. Accordingly, all things being equal,
the Bank has sought high quality assets whose characteristics cause the
management of interest rate risk to be simple.
The asset owned by the Bank for several years which best fits that
description is an asset-backed security issued by a subsidiary of Navistar.
This particular security was rated AAA by the major rating agencies at
53
<PAGE>
issuance and has continued to enjoy such ratings since that time. Its rate
floats monthly at a fixed spread over one month LIBOR without any periodic or
life caps limiting possible rate adjustments. This investment has performed
extremely well for Roosevelt by providing at least a 1.00% spread over the
Bank's marginal borrowing costs and frequently providing over a 2.00% spread
over the Bank's marginal retail costs. There has been no level of interest
rates or slope in the yield curve which has challenged the profitability of
this investment.
Unfortunately, investments such as the one described above are sufficiently
rare that other types of assets had to be considered. The type of asset most
readily available and most similar to the Navistar security described above,
has been the floating-rate mortgage-backed security. These floating-rate MBS
have been either directly issued by FNMA or FHLMC, or, they have been
collateralized by such credits in sufficient magnitude to gain AAA ratings
from the major rating agencies. There has been a long enough history of such
securities, without credit downgrades, that Management is comfortable with its
assertion that, on a bond by bond basis, the credit risk has been diffused.
Regarding the IRR of owning such securities, the key is that the rates float
on a monthly or quarterly basis over LIBOR. Accordingly, the yield on such
securities can fluctuate without a periodic cap in order to mirror the Bank's
fluctuating short-term funding costs. The sole IRR of these securities is
related to them having a lifetime cap. Roosevelt typically buys such
securities when the particular lifetime cap is several hundred basis points
above the then current rate. Accordingly, properly managed, Roosevelt believes
that owning such securities is also a relatively low risk activity.
The remainder of Roosevelt's AFS portfolio is comprised of more typical
adjustable-rate MBS and, to a much more limited extent, fixed-rate MBS.
Roosevelt's daily purchase decisions are highly driven by assessing which
available security type is providing the highest risk-adjusted spread on that
day. However, Roosevelt has a strong preference for simplicity and safety.
Accordingly, if floating-rate, adjustable-rate and fixed-rate agency MBS are
all offering exactly 1.00% spreads over the yield on comparable duration
Treasurys, then Management would generally buy the floating-rate security.
If there was a so-called normal, upwardly sloping, yield curve on that day,
Management would be accepting the lowest outright yield. This is true because
floating-rate MBS typically are compared to the shortest (lowest yielding)
Treasurys; adjustable-rate MBS are typically compared to Treasurys whose
maturities are less short; and, fixed-rate MBS are typically compared to
longer duration (higher yielding) Treasurys. Such a fact demonstrates that
Roosevelt's Management is seldom interested in the outright yield of a
security in its AFS portfolio. By ignoring outright yields, Management begins
to demonstrate how it is different from the managements of certain other
banks. By being indifferent to outright yield--by focusing only on the risk-
adjusted spread over the yield of a comparable duration Treasury security--
Management becomes less vulnerable to skilled bond salesmen. A few extra basis
points in yield will not cause Roosevelt's Management to think the bond is a
better investment.
In order for Roosevelt to buy an adjustable-rate MBS in lieu of a floating-
rate MBS, the adjustable-rate security would need to promise a wider spread
over its comparable duration Treasury security than that promised by the
floating-rate security. In order for Roosevelt to buy a fixed-rate MBS in lieu
of an adjustable-rate MBS, it too would need to promise a yet wider spread
over its comparable duration Treasury. These facts illustrate two points.
First, all things being equal, Roosevelt will own the shortest term assets in
the AFS portfolio which accordingly will require the least effort to manage
the IRR. Secondly, Roosevelt's analysis reveals that fixed-rate MBS spreads
are seldom as wide as are adjustable-rate MBS spreads. Due to this second
point, fixed-rate MBS will generally represent a minority of the AFS
portfolio. This is also the reason why Roosevelt's MBS held to maturity
portfolio is also dominated by adjustable-rate securities--which typically
carry less inherent risk.
ASSESSING IRR
Due to all of the above, Roosevelt's management believes that its AFS
portfolio embodies less IRR than a typical bank's portfolio of agency and
corporate securities. In viewing the balance sheets of publicly traded bank
54
<PAGE>
holding companies, Roosevelt's Management has noticed significant changes in
the value of the securities portfolios at these other institutions when
interest rates change. Due to SFAS 115, such IRR can create considerable
volatility within stockholders' equity. With the benefit of a long track
record, Management's confidence is bolstered by noticing that the total market
value of all of Roosevelt's assets, and the assets within its AFS portfolio,
do not change materially with changes in interest rates. As noted earlier,
relatively few banks can make this claim.
Another key to Roosevelt's success is the manner in which it assesses IRR.
When evaluating either a security for purchase or a pre-existing portfolio of
securities, Roosevelt assesses risk by noting the current market value and the
predicted market values under eight different scenarios--wherein rates are
assumed to be 1%, 2%, 3% or 4% higher and 1%, 2%, 3% or 4% lower. Whenever the
value of a security varies in a material way with changes in rates of only 1%
or 2%, then Roosevelt deems that the security or the portfolio has material
risk and needs to be addressed accordingly.
This manner of assessing risk has enabled Roosevelt to maintain a stable and
relatively event-risk-free portfolio. As an example, during the early 1990's
the FHLB system issued various "structured notes". Most of these longer term
notes carried rates which adjusted over time pursuant to a predetermined
formula. Many portfolio managers heard "agency issuer" and "adjustable-rate"
and they felt that their risk assessment was completed. The "agency issuer"
status meant that credit risk should not be an issue. Thinking only about a
repricing "GAP" table, the "adjustable-rate" status meant that interest rate
risk must have been nil.
However, these bonds are not risk free. With many of the bonds, as with the
supposedly short-term CMO market, the effective maturity dates could change
dramatically based on the environment. The differing possible environmental
situations could cause the bonds to perform poorly by floating the rate
relative to the lowest of a number of indexes or by invoking structural caps
that meant that the rates effectively could only float down rather than up.
While the details of each situation were varied, the issuers were all
motivated by shifting the risks of volatility to unsuspecting portfolio
managers.
Usually, these bonds offered higher yields at issue than the yields of other
floating-rate agency paper. Roosevelt's multi-scenario value analysis revealed
that under various scenarios, the bonds could have declined in value
considerably. In short, the more volatile the scenario, the worse the bonds
would perform. Roosevelt's practice of evaluating risk versus reward over a
wide range of scenarios, prevented it from buying any of these securities.
MANAGING IRR
The preceding discussion explains conceptually what Roosevelt buys and how
it measures IRR. The next question is: How does Roosevelt mitigate or manage
the IRR? The answer lies in the same type of multi-scenario value analysis as
described above.
In a simple example, say the position is expected to lose $6 million in
unrecognized market value with a 1% permanent and parallel shift upward in the
yield curve. This is the type of situation which would exist if the portfolio
contained some longer dated assets which were not funded by longer dated
liabilities.
In this situation, the Bank may try to create a longer dated liability out
of a pool of short-term liabilities. This can be accomplished by entering into
a pay-fixed swap agreement. Such would entail Roosevelt agreeing to pay a
fixed rate of interest for a period of ten years to a very high quality
"primary dealer" in return for the receipt of a variable rate of interest on
the exact same notional amount of liability. This type of interest rate swap
will gain in value if rates rise. Depending upon the level of interest rates,
a $100 million pay-fixed swap may provide the desired $6 million gain if rates
move up 1.0%. This gain will offset the potential losses depicted earlier and
cause the net value of the Company to be unaffected by the potential rise in
interest rates.
55
<PAGE>
On a cash flow and accounting basis, the fixed-rate being paid on the swap
should match up advantageously with the fixed-rate being earned on the asset.
Also, the variable-rate being received on the swap should match up with the
variable-rate being paid on the underlying short-term liability. Accordingly,
a 1.0% rise in rates will cause the Bank's funding cost to rise, but, that
rise will be offset by the increase in the variable-rate received from the
swap counterparty.
PENCHANT FOR SIMPLICITY
The swap agreement described above clearly qualifies to be called a
"derivative." Long before "derivatives" became a dirty word, due to the misuse
by unwary practitioners, Roosevelt has limited its usage. Ideally, Roosevelt
would like to fund short-term assets with short-term liabilities. It would
like to fund intermediate-term assets with intermediate-term liabilities. And,
it would like to fund long-term assets with long-term liabilities. As much as
is possible, Roosevelt does just that.
Frequently, however, the assets with the richest risk-adjusted spreads do
not always come in the exact same volume and maturity as the liabilities with
the lowest risk-adjusted cost. Accordingly, mismatches of some magnitude are
usually present. The mismatches are typically mitigated by some instrument
which qualifies to be called a derivative. However, it is a primary goal of
Roosevelt to not only maintain a low risk profile, but, to utilize swaps and
other derivatives as little as possible. Growth in Roosevelt's retail business
is expected to lessen the necessity for swaps.
Underscoring Management's success in this regard is the fact that the total
swap portfolio at December 31, 1995 (when the Company had over $9 billion in
assets) is less than it was on December 31, 1990 (when the Company had barely
over $2 billion in assets). Also, as of January 31, 1996, Roosevelt had closed
out its financial futures positions which further underscores Management's
desire to simplify its position and to look more like a traditional bank.
Management believes that future successes in building its retail business can
lead to a continued decline in its use of derivatives without changing its low
risk profile.
IMBEDDED OPTIONS
It was discussed above how paying a fixed rate of interest on a swap might
offset the risk of owning longer term MBS in a scenario when rates rose 1%.
However, Roosevelt's multi-scenario analysis also considers other possible
outcomes--like a 3% decline in rates.
In this declining rate scenario, the Bank would still pay the same fixed
rate on the swap, short-term funding costs would decline to offset the decline
in the variable rate to be received from the swap counterparty, but, the fixed
rates being received on the mortgages would be in definite peril. With much
lower interest rates being available, the fixed-rate mortgages would likely
refinance.
This example explains the primary problem with owning mortgages. If rates
decline, the value of the mortgage goes up for obvious reasons. However,
prepayments will rise and the effective maturity of the mortgage will shorten.
Accordingly, the increase in value decelerates as rates decline. In this
scenario, your great yielding 7-year bond just became a 5-year bond thereby
blunting its value rise. If rates fall a full 3%, most of the MBS would be
expected to prepay inside of one year. No matter how low your funding costs
go, there will be no gain in value to offset the considerable loss in value on
the pay-fixed swap position.
This asymmetry is clearly skewed for the customer and against the mortgage-
holder. As rates rise, the values decline for obvious reasons. However, as
rates rise, prepayments slow down causing the effective maturity of the
mortgage to lengthen. Accordingly, the decline in value accelerates as rates
rise--because your underwater 7-year bond just became an underwater 8-year
bond. If rates rise further, it can become an underwater 10-year bond.
Roosevelt's strategy to avoid the scenarios just described is to buy options
to offset the options it essentially gives away when it makes or buys a
mortgage. The primary source of options bought by Roosevelt are floor and cap
agreements. These agreements are similar to swaps whereby they are negotiated
with counterparties.
56
<PAGE>
When 3-month LIBOR was approximately 9.5%, Roosevelt bought a floor from a
high quality counterparty that agreed to pay Roosevelt if LIBOR fell below an
8% "floor" rate. Roosevelt made one up-front premium payment to acquire the
option. That payment was then amortized over the life of the floor agreement.
With LIBOR at 10%, Roosevelt got no cash flow from the floor and the downside
was limited to what was paid for the protection (a cost of owning a mortgage
portfolio).
However, the upside for Roosevelt on this option was virtually unlimited. At
inception, Roosevelt would get no cash flow unless LIBOR (10%) declined more
than 2% to go below the floor rate of 8%. If LIBOR declined to 5%, Roosevelt
would enjoy a 3% spread on the predetermined notional amount of the contract.
LIBOR actually declined nearer to 3% during 1993 and the Bank's floor position
kept it from being hurt by prepayments.
The more LIBOR fell, the more cash flow Roosevelt would gain. On this
contract, Roosevelt had a limited downside (the premium) to match off against
a limited upside to the value of a mortgage. However, the contract had an
unlimited upside in value as LIBOR fell to offset the unlimited potential
decline in value of the swap as rates fell. Accordingly, this option (the
floor) offset the prepayment option imbedded in the mortgage.
Roosevelt also acknowledges the need for option protection as rates rise.
Such are needed to either offset the accelerating decline in the value of
mortgages as rates rise or to offset the periodic caps in adjustable-rate
mortgages which can prevent the full upward adjustment in the rates. Roosevelt
acquired cap agreements for this scenario.
With cap agreements, Roosevelt's downside is, again, limited to the premium
paid at execution. This premium is again amortized over the life of the
agreement as a cost of doing business. At December 31, 1995, LIBOR was a
little over 5%.
Roosevelt owns some caps with a 7% cap rate. With such agreements, Roosevelt
will receive a spread from the counterparty if LIBOR goes above 7%. As rates
begin to rise toward the cap rate, the value of Roosevelt's position begins to
rise. Roosevelt's upside is unlimited because the potential rise in LIBOR is
unlimited.
Roosevelt believes that whenever an investor owns a mortgage portfolio
(loans or securities), it should own some options to neutralize the prepayment
and cap risks. Roosevelt has perpetually owned options in a magnitude in
proportion to its mortgage holdings. An important factor in Roosevelt's
success is that it only buys options--it never sells or writes options (other
than to its mortgage customers via their ability to prepay). With Roosevelt's
options (caps, floors, etc.) the downside is limited and finite--just as is
the cost of buying fire insurance on your home. However, the potential upside
is unlimited. In this regard, these options are better than homeowners
insurance, because such insurance does have limits to its coverage or
potential payoff.
CURRENT OPERATING STRATEGIES
Roosevelt's Management believes that the long-term value of a financial
institution is related to having strong relationships with its customers
whereby a household seeks to derive most of its financial services from a
single vendor (like Roosevelt). To position itself in this manner, Roosevelt's
business plan emphasizes 1) the origination of a higher percentage of its
assets; 2) the diversification of the balance sheet away from only mortgage
and real estate related assets; 3) the expansion of its retail deposit base
with a simultaneous shift within that deposit base toward checking and
transaction accounts; and 4) growth in fee income by providing other services
such as insurance, brokerage and mortgage loan servicing for other investors.
57
<PAGE>
ACQUISITIONS
A substantial portion of the Company's growth since 1990 has occurred as a
result of acquisitions. The following table summarizes Roosevelt's
acquisitions since the formation of the Bank in 1987. The Company has entered
into definitive agreements to acquire two additional financial institution
holding companies and expects to continue informal discussions with other
banking and thrift institutions regarding their acquisition by the Company.
See "Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. and Roosevelt Bank--Roosevelt Financial
Group, Inc."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DATE
ACQUISITION NAME ACQUIRED LOANS DEPOSITS ASSETS BRANCHES
---------------- ----------------- ------- -------- ------- --------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Home Federal Savings of
Alton.................... March 19, 1990 $ 67.2 $ 12.1 $ 99.1 4
Hannibal Mutual Loan and
Building Association..... October 18, 1991 7.8 17.8 18.0 1
Conservative Bank, FSB.... November 9, 1992 41.5 61.2 64.5 4
First Granite City Savings
and Loan................. November 9, 1992 43.4 42.0 49.2 2
Brookside Savings Bank,
FSB...................... December 1, 1992 16.1 145.7 218.7 1
First Nationwide (branch
purchases)............... June 11, 1993 -- 591.1 -- 11
Home Savings of America
(branch purchases)....... November 8, 1993 -- 738.1 -- 13
Home Federal Bancorp of
Missouri, Inc. .......... April 22, 1994 480.7 466.5 532.7 9
Farm & Home Financial
Corporation.............. June 30, 1994 1,843.3 2,094.7 3,173.5 27
WSB Bancorp, Inc. ........ October 20, 1995 80.9 80.8 96.9 2
Kirsksville Bancshares,
Inc. .................... December 29, 1995 69.4 101.9 130.7 1
</TABLE>
LENDING ACTIVITIES
The Company's lending activities are principally conducted through the
origination and purchase of loans.
Residential Lending--The Company's origination activities are generally
focused on communities in Missouri, southern Illinois, and eastern Kansas in
which its branches are located and in other midwestern states through its
correspondent network. Primary emphasis is on mortgage loans secured by
existing one- to four- family residential properties. At December 31, 1995,
loans secured by residential real estate totaled $3.3 billion, which
represented 92.35% of the Company's loan portfolio.
The Company follows a residential loan pricing discipline that results in
loan yields comparable to investments of other Company assets. The methodology
takes into consideration duration of the loan, prepayment risks, servicing
costs, and credit risk. In underwriting residential real estate loans, the
Company evaluates both the borrower's ability to make monthly payments and the
value of the property securing the loan. Under Federal regulations, a real
estate loan may not exceed 100% of the appraised value of the property
securing the loan at the time of origination. The Company has adopted a policy
of generally limiting the loan-to-value ratio on originated loans and
refinanced loans, depending upon loan type, and generally requiring that all
loans exceeding 80% of the appraised value of the property or its purchase
price, whichever is less, be insured by a mortgage insurance company approved
by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) in an amount sufficient
to reduce the Company's exposure to no greater than such 80% level.
In addition to interest earned on loans, the Company receives fees in
connection with the origination of loans, loan commitments, late payments, and
other miscellaneous services. The amounts of such fees vary from time to time,
generally depending on competitive conditions in the mortgage market.
As described below, the Company currently offers several types of
residential loans.
Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Loans--The Company originates secured adjustable-
rate mortgage loans (ARMs) in principal amounts of up to $750,000, depending
upon loan type, loan-to-value ratio, and term. The majority of adjustable-rate
mortgage loans which have been originated by the Company are held in its
portfolio.
58
<PAGE>
ARM loans offered consist of a variety of types, with interest rate
adjustments ranging from one month to 10 years. The ARMs provide for
adjustments to the interest rate based upon the one or three year U.S.
Treasury Bill Index adjusted to constant maturity, plus a margin which is
determined at the time of application and remains constant for the life of the
loan. Interest rate adjustments are limited to a maximum of 2% per year and a
maximum of 6% over the life of the loan on both one-year and the three-year
adjustable mortgages.
Fixed-Rate Loans--The Company also originates secured fixed-rate mortgage
loans in principal amounts of up to $750,000, depending upon loan type, loan-
to-value ratio, and term. The Company's fixed-rate loans generally have terms
from 15 to 30 years with monthly payments which fully amortize the principal
and interest over the life of the loan. The Company may occasionally originate
balloon/interest reset mortgages that are fixed-rate.
FHA/VA Loans--The Company originates FHA insured and VA guaranteed single
family mortgage loans. Guidelines for processing, underwriting, and closing of
these loans, which typically have terms to maturity of 25 to 30 years, are
established by the FHA and the VA.
The types of loans which the Company may originate are restricted by the
HOLA and other laws and are regulated by the OTS. Federal regulations permit
Roosevelt to originate or purchase loans and loan participations secured by
real estate located in any part of the United States. Roosevelt's residential
lending is primarily concentrated in the geographical location of its branches
and in other midwestern states through the Company's correspondent network.
Commercial Real Estate and Construction Lending--Loans originated by the
Company generally are secured by first liens on the properties to which they
relate. The Company also purchases real estate loans and loan participations
from selected sellers. The Company focuses its originations on properties
located within its retail markets of Missouri, southern Illinois and eastern
Kansas.
At December 31, 1995, loans secured by commercial real estate (including
multi-family residential properties) and construction lending totaled $149.5
million of which loans secured by commercial real estate totaled $137.5
million, representing 3.83% of the Company's total loan portfolio. The
Company's portfolio of commercial real estate loans is secured by liens on
office buildings, apartments, land, and shopping centers.
Consumer Lending--Federal regulations permit federally chartered thrift
institutions to make secured and unsecured consumer loans up to a maximum of
35% of the institution's total assets less permissible investments in
commercial paper and corporate debt. In addition, federal thrift institutions
have lending authority above the 35% limit for certain consumer loans such as
home equity loans, property improvement loans and mobile home loans.
The Company offers various variable-rate and fixed-rate consumer loans,
including automobile, marine, recreational vehicle, home improvement,
unsecured personal, and home equity loans. The Company also offers loans to
its depositors on the security of their deposit accounts.
Substantially all consumer loans made directly to the borrower are
originated in branches within the states of Missouri and Illinois. Roosevelt
has placed a renewed emphasis on the origination of consumer loans due to
their generally higher yielding nature. During the second half of 1995,
Roosevelt began purchasing "A" quality indirect auto lease paper originated by
a leasing company. These loans are secured by the types of autos which
generally hold their value well and have good mechanical histories. Indirect
auto lease originations totaled $16.7 million during 1995.
At December 31, 1995, the Company's consumer loan balances totaled $125.6
million which represented 3.49% of the Company's total loan portfolio.
Loan Portfolio Composition--The following table sets forth information
concerning the composition of the Company's loan portfolio in dollar amounts
and in percentages by type of loan at the dates indicated.
59
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
------------------- ------------------- ------------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REAL ESTATE LOANS:
Residential........... $3,320,098 92.35% $2,887,992 92.48% $2,465,592 89.78%
Commercial............ 137,507 3.83 132,316 4.24 144,295 5.25
Construction.......... 11,969 0.33 18,489 0.59 95,550 3.48
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total real estate
loans held to
maturity........... 3,469,574 96.51 3,038,797 97.31 2,705,437 98.51
CONSUMER LOANS.......... 125,633 3.49 84,013 2.69 40,831 1.49
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total loans......... 3,595,207 100.0% 3,122,810 100.0% 2,746,268 100.0%
===== ===== =====
LESS:
Loans in process...... 4,266 28,348 59,146
Deferred fees and
discounts
(premiums)........... (8,806) (604) 6,256
Allowance for losses.. 21,855 22,915 9,056
---------- ---------- ----------
Loans, net.......... $3,577,892 $3,072,151 $2,671,810
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1992 1991
------------------ ------------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
---------- ------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REAL ESTATE LOANS:
Residential............................ $2,141,863 88.36% $2,074,657 88.56%
Commercial............................. 134,321 5.54 109,551 4.68
Construction........................... 109,627 4.52 121,877 5.20
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total real estate loans held to matu-
rity................................ 2,385,811 98.42 2,306,085 98.44
CONSUMER LOANS........................... 38,381 1.58 36,489 1.56
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total loans............................ 2,424,192 100.0% 2,342,574 100.0%
===== =====
LESS:
Loans in process....................... 41,833 44,928
Deferred fees and discounts
(premiums)............................ 21,835 29,443
Allowance for losses................... 10,753 8,336
---------- ----------
Loans, net........................... $2,349,771 $2,259,867
========== ==========
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE>
The following table shows the composition of the Company's fixed- and
adjustable-rate loans at the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
------------------- ------------------- ------------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FIXED-RATE LOANS:
Real estate:
Residential........... $1,226,691 34.12% $1,107,604 35.47% $1,171,453 42.66%
Commercial............ 74,271 2.07 77,164 2.47 82,209 2.99
Construction.......... 1,202 .03 -- -- -- --
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total fixed-rate
real estate loans.. 1,302,164 36.22 1,184,768 37.94 1,253,662 45.65
Consumer.............. 58,645 1.63 28,715 0.92 22,680 0.83
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total fixed-rate
loans.............. 1,360,809 37.85 1,213,483 38.86 1,276,342 46.48
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
ADJUSTABLE-RATE LOANS:
Real estate:
Residential........... 2,093,407 58.23 1,780,388 57.01 1,294,139 47.12
Commercial............ 63,236 1.76 55,152 1.77 62,086 2.26
Construction.......... 10,767 0.30 18,489 0.59 95,550 3.48
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total adjustable-
rate real estate
loans.............. 2,167,410 60.29 1,854,029 59.37 1,451,775 52.86
Consumer.............. 66,988 1.86 55,298 1.77 18,151 0.66
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total adjustable-
rate loans......... 2,234,398 62.15 1,909,327 61.14 1,469,926 53.52
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total loans......... 3,595,207 100.00% 3,122,810 100.00% 2,746,268 100.00%
====== ====== ======
LESS:
Loans in process....... 4,266 28,348 59,146
Deferred fees and
discounts (premiums).. (8,806) (604) 6,256
Allowance for losses... 21,855 22,915 9,056
---------- ---------- ----------
Loans, net.......... $3,577,892 $3,072,151 $2,671,810
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1992 1991
------------------ ------------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
---------- ------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FIXED-RATE LOANS:
Real estate:
Residential............................ $1,437,122 59.29% $1,261,219 53.84%
Commercial............................. 82,275 3.39 72,995 3.12
Construction........................... -- -- -- --
---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total fixed-rate real estate loans... 1,519,397 62.68 1,334,214 56.96
Consumer............................... 25,396 1.05 21,128 0.90
---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total fixed-rate loans............... 1,544,793 63.73 1,355,342 57.86
---------- ------ ---------- ------
ADJUSTABLE-RATE LOANS:
Real estate:
Residential............................ 704,741 29.07 813,438 34.73
Commercial............................. 52,046 2.15 36,556 1.56
Construction........................... 109,627 4.52 121,877 5.20
---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total adjustable-rate real estate
loans............................... 866,414 35.74 971,871 41.49
Consumer............................... 12,985 0.53 15,361 0.65
---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total adjustable-rate loans.......... 879,399 36.27 987,232 42.14
---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total loans.......................... 2,424,192 100.00% 2,342,574 100.00%
====== ======
LESS:
Loans in process........................ 41,833 44,928
Deferred fees and discounts (premiums).. 21,835 29,443
Allowance for losses.................... 10,753 8,336
---------- ----------
Loans, net........................... $2,349,771 $2,259,867
========== ==========
</TABLE>
61
<PAGE>
INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
The Company invests in short-term investments such as United States Treasury
securities and United States agency securities, commercial paper, short-term
corporate debt securities, and overnight federal funds. The Company is
required by federal regulations to maintain a minimum amount of liquid assets
that may be invested in specific securities and is also permitted to make
certain other securities investments. The balance of the investment securities
maintained by the Company in excess of regulatory requirements reflects
management's objective of maintaining liquidity at a level that assures the
availability of adequate funds, taking into account anticipated cash flows and
available sources of credit, for meeting withdrawal requests and loan
commitments and making other investments. See "Regulation--Liquidity."
The acquisition of mortgage-backed securities is designed to (i) generate
positive interest rate spreads on large principal balances with minimal
administrative expense, (ii) lower the credit risk of the Company's loan
portfolio, and (iii) enable the Company to use these mortgage-backed
securities as collateral for financings in the capital markets. Mortgage-
backed securities acquired by the Company for investment typically consist of
FHLMC mortgage participation certificates (FHLMC Certificates), FNMA mortgage
pass-through certificates (FNMA Certificates) and/or GNMA fully-modified,
pass-through mortgage-backed certificates (GNMA Certificates), and private
issue pass-through certificates, each of which is described below.
FHLMC Certificates--FHLMC Certificates represent undivided interests in
specified pools of fixed, variable, or adjustable rate, conventional
residential mortgage loans or participation interests in conventional
residential mortgage loans purchased by FHLMC. FHLMC guarantees to each
registered holder of a FHLMC Certificate the timely payment of interest. FHLMC
also guarantees to each registered holder of a FHLMC Certificate the ultimate
collection by such holder of principal thereof, but, except in certain cases,
does not guarantee the timely payment of principal thereof. The obligations of
FHLMC are not backed by, nor entitled to, the full faith and credit of the
United States. Neither the United States nor any agency or instrumentality of
the United States is obligated to finance the operations of FHLMC or to assist
FHLMC in any other manner. There is currently an active secondary market for
FHLMC Certificates, but there is no assurance that this market will continue
in the future.
FNMA Certificates--FNMA Certificates represent undivided interests in
specified pools of fixed, variable, or adjustable rate one- to four-family
residential mortgage loans. FNMA guarantees the timely payment of scheduled
principal and interest (at the applicable certificate rate). The obligations
of FNMA under its guarantees are obligations solely of FNMA and are not backed
by, nor entitled to, the full faith and credit of the United States. Neither
the United States nor any agency or instrumentality of the United States is
obligated to finance FNMA's operations or to assist FNMA in any other manner.
There is currently an active secondary market for FNMA Certificates, but there
can be no assurance that this market will continue in the future.
GNMA Certificates--GNMA Certificates are issued and serviced by a mortgage
banking company or financial institution approved by GNMA as a seller-servicer
of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured mortgage notes or Veterans
Administration (VA) guaranteed mortgage notes. The full and timely payment of
principal of, and interest on, each GNMA Certificate is guaranteed by GNMA,
which obligation is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.
Each GNMA Certificate evidences a fractional undivided interest in a pool of
FHA insured mortgage notes and VA guaranteed mortgage notes secured by
mortgages on single family dwellings. There is currently an active secondary
market for GNMA Certificates, but there is no assurance that this market will
continue in the future.
Private-Issue Certificates--Private pass-through certificates represent
primarily undivided interests in specified pools of fixed, variable or
adjustable rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Such
securities are issued by private entities such as commercial banks, thrifts,
and other financial entities. At December 31, 1995, the Company's $2.7 billion
portfolio of private pass-throughs was primarily comprised of adjustable rate
securities. The repricing characteristics of such securities were primarily
tied to the one year constant maturity treasury rate. These securities are not
guaranteed or insured by any government agency. Instead, the credit risk
62
<PAGE>
on such securities is lowered through mortgage pool insurance, letters of
credit, guarantees, or subordinated interests.
At December 31, 1995 there were approximately $1.3 billion of private issue
pass-through certificates with unrealized losses totaling $21.8 million. None
of the unrealized losses exceeded $2.0 million or 5% of the respective
security balance.
Since mortgage-backed securities are asset-backed, they are subject to
inherent risks based upon the future performance of the underlying collateral
(i.e., mortgage loans) for these securities. Among these risks, are prepayment
risk and interest-rate risk.
Should general interest-rate levels decline, the mortgage-backed securities
portfolio would be subject to i) prepayments as borrowers typically would seek
to obtain financing at lower rates, ii) a decline in interest income received
on adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities, and iii) an increase in fair
value of fixed rate mortgage-backed securities. Conversely, should general
interest rate levels increase, the mortgage-backed securities portfolio would
be subject to i) a longer term to maturity as borrowers would be less likely
to prepay their loans, ii) an increase in interest income received on
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities, iii) a decline in fair value of
fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities, and iv) a decline in fair value of
adjustable-rate mortgage- backed securities to an extent dependent upon the
level of interest-rate increases, the time period of the next interest rate
repricing date for the individual security and the applicable periodic (annual
and/or lifetime) cap which could limit the degree to which the individual
security could reprice within a given time period.
Unlike U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities which include a
full guarantee of principal and interest, private issuer mortgage-backed
securities are generally structured with a senior ownership position and
subordinate ownership position(s) providing credit support of the senior
position. In a limited number of cases, this support is provided through
letters of credit or cash reserves. Given the structure of the private issuer
mortgage-backed securities, the Company has credit risk in addition to
interest-rate and prepayment risk discussed above. In this regard, management
has instituted a monitoring system tracking the major factors affecting the
performance of a private issuer mortgage-backed security including i) a review
of delinquencies, foreclosures, repossessions and recovery rates relative to
the underlying mortgage loans collateralizing each security, ii) the level of
available subordination or other credit enhancement and iii) the rating
assigned to each security by independent national rating agencies.
63
<PAGE>
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
The following table sets forth information concerning the Company's
securities available for sale portfolio at the dates indicated, at fair value:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Investment securities:
U.S. Government and agency obligations..... $ 11,085 $ -- $ 46,317
Corporate securities....................... 16,763 -- --
FHLB stock................................. 132,009 109,136 81,352
---------- ---------- ----------
159,857 109,136 127,669
---------- ---------- ----------
Mortgage-backed Securities:
Mortgage-backed certificates............... 1,372,947 1,533,312 1,411,195
Other...................................... 60,701 59,703 147,870
Derivative financial instruments:
Interest rate exchange agreements.......... (6,528) 3,476 (27,242)
Interest rate cap agreements............... 8,738 57,897 4,144
Interest rate floor agreements............. 10,746 1,582 2,243
Exchange traded options.................... -- 593 --
---------- ---------- ----------
1,446,604 1,656,563 1,538,210
---------- ---------- ----------
$1,606,461 $1,765,699 $1,665,879
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
The following schedule illustrates the maturities of the Company's securities
available for sale portfolio at December 31, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DUE AFTER ONE DUE AFTER FIVE
DUE WITHIN BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN DUE AFTER NO STATED
ONE YEAR FIVE YEARS TEN YEARS TEN YEARS MATURITY TOTAL
---------- ------------- -------------- ---------- --------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
U.S. Government and
agency obligations... $1,493 $ 5,548 $ 3,025 $ 1,019 $ -- $ 11,085
Corporate securities.. 1,262 4,480 10,977 44 -- 16,763
FHLB stock............ -- -- -- -- 132,009 132,009
------ ------- ------- ---------- -------- ----------
2,755 10,028 14,002 1,063 132,009 159,857
------ ------- ------- ---------- -------- ----------
Mortgage-backed
Securities:
Mortgage-backed
certificates......... 689 1,814 498 1,369,946 -- 1,372,947
Other................. -- -- -- 60,701 -- 60,701
Derivative financial
instruments:
Interest rate ex-
change
agreements......... -- -- -- (6,528) -- (6,528)
Interest rate cap
agreements......... -- -- -- 8,738 -- 8,738
Interest rate floor
agreements......... -- -- -- 10,746 -- 10,746
------ ------- ------- ---------- -------- ----------
689 1,814 498 1,443,603 -- 1,446,604
------ ------- ------- ---------- -------- ----------
$3,444 $11,842 $14,500 $1,444,666 $132,009 $1,606,461
====== ======= ======= ========== ======== ==========
Weighted average yield.. 5.91% 6.92% 9.95% 7.94% 6.50% 7.83%
====== ======= ======= ========== ======== ==========
</TABLE>
64
<PAGE>
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
The following table sets forth information concerning the Company's
securities held to maturity portfolio at the dates indicated, at cost:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
U.S. Government and agency obligations....... $ 113,554 $ 115,500 $ 2,426
Corporate securities......................... 5,632 41,273 50,701
---------- ---------- ----------
119,186 156,773 53,127
---------- ---------- ----------
Mortgage-backed Securities:
Mortgage-backed certificates................. 384,795 459,190 417,165
Private pass-throughs........................ 2,705,311 2,271,272 2,172,624
Collateralized mortgage obligations.......... 340,848 388,827 --
---------- ---------- ----------
3,430,954 3,119,289 2,589,789
---------- ---------- ----------
$3,550,140 $3,276,062 $2,642,916
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995, the Company held certain mortgage-backed securities
classified as held to maturity (which are included in the preceding securities
held to maturity composition table) whose aggregate book value by issuer
exceeded ten percent of stockholders' equity. Such investments are detailed as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ISSUER CARRYING VALUE MARKET VALUE
- ------ -------------- ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Resolution Trust Corporation....................... $470,235 $464,871
Ryland Mortgage Securities Corporation............. 423,421 424,537
Saxon Mortgage Securities Corporation.............. 194,756 195,424
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.............. 186,175 185,374
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp....... 174,963 175,026
Capstead Securities Corporation.................... 165,716 164,782
Nomura Asset Capital Corporation................... 156,750 153,908
Securitized Asset Sales, Inc....................... 154,008 154,849
Greenwich Capital Acceptance, Inc.................. 135,595 139,503
Sears Mortgage Securities.......................... 120,012 118,879
Residential Funding Corporation.................... 90,721 90,421
ITT Federal........................................ 83,917 84,596
Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.................. 71,272 67,873
Guardian Savings & Loan Association................ 70,831 67,733
Salomon Brothers Mortgage Services................. 68,065 71,356
Bear Stearns Mortgage Acceptance................... 64,206 64,391
Paine Webber Mortgage Acceptance Corp.............. 61,209 62,711
Glendale Federal Bank.............................. 58,078 58,051
</TABLE>
65
<PAGE>
The following schedule illustrates the maturities of the Company's
securities held to maturity portfolio at December 31, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DUE AFTER ONE DUE AFTER FIVE
DUE WITHIN BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN DUE AFTER
ONE YEAR FIVE YEARS TEN YEARS TEN YEARS TOTAL
---------- ------------- -------------- ---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
U.S. Government and
agency obligations... $ 4,480 $109,074 $ -- $ -- $ 113,554
Corporate securities.. 5,632 -- -- -- 5,632
------- -------- ------ ---------- ----------
10,112 109,074 -- -- 119,186
------- -------- ------ ---------- ----------
Mortgage-backed
Securities:
Mortgage-backed
certificates......... 25,363 178,222 6,090 175,120 384,795
Private pass-
throughs............. -- 55,668 261 2,649,382 2,705,311
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations.......... -- -- -- 340,848 340,848
------- -------- ------ ---------- ----------
25,363 233,890 6,351 3,165,350 3,430,954
------- -------- ------ ---------- ----------
$35,475 $342,964 $6,351 $3,165,350 $3,550,140
======= ======== ====== ========== ==========
Weighted average yield.. 5.20% 6.25% 9.05% 7.52% 7.37%
======= ======== ====== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
CLASSIFIED ASSETS, LOAN DELINQUENCIES AND DEFAULTS
Federal regulations provide for the classification of loans, debt, equity
securities, and other assets considered to be of lesser quality as
"substandard", "doubtful" or "loss" assets. The regulations require
institutions to classify their own assets and to establish prudent general
allowances for losses for assets classified "substandard" or "doubtful." The
OTS may require the establishment of a general allowance for losses based on
assets classified as "substandard" and "doubtful" or based on the general
quality of the asset portfolio of an institution. For the portion of assets
classified as "loss," an institution is required to either establish specific
allowances of 100% of the amount classified or charge such amount off its
books. Assets which do not currently expose the institution to sufficient risk
to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess
potential weaknesses are required to be designated "special mention" by
management.
When a borrower fails to make a required payment on the loan, the Company
attempts to cause the delinquency to be cured by contacting the borrower. In
the case of residential loans, telephone contacts are normally made after a
payment is 19 days past due. In most cases, delinquencies are cured promptly.
If the delinquency is not cured by the 30th day, written contacts or personal
calls are made to the borrower. If the delinquency continues for a period of
90 days, the Company usually institutes appropriate action to foreclose the
property. If foreclosed, the property is sold at public auction and may be
purchased by the Company. Under Missouri law, subject to rights of redemption
and certain homestead and other exemptions, property normally may be
foreclosed after payments become more than 31 days past due, by publishing or
posting appropriate notices of the foreclosure action during a subsequent
period of 20 days. Delinquent consumer loans are generally handled in a
similar manner, except that initial telephone contacts are made when the
payment is five days past due. The Company's procedures for repossession and
sale of consumer collateral are subject to various requirements under Missouri
consumer protection laws.
PROVISIONS FOR LOSSES ON LOANS AND REAL ESTATE OWNED
The Company establishes valuation allowances for anticipated losses on
loans, foreclosed assets, and real estate acquired for development and sale,
as described below. Although management believes it uses the best available
information in establishing valuation allowances, future provisions for loss
charged to expense may be necessary if circumstances differ substantially from
the assumptions currently used.
66
<PAGE>
Loans--The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount considered
adequate to provide for losses. The provision for loan losses charged to
expense is based on periodic analysis of the loan portfolio by management. In
this regard, management considers various risk factors including, but not
limited to, general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, prior
loss experience, and independent appraisals. In addition to an allowance for
losses on identified problem loans, an overall unallocated allowance is
maintained to provide for unidentified credit losses. In estimating such
losses, management considers various risk factors including geographic
location, loan collateral, and prior loss experience.
The allowance for loan losses increased significantly during 1994 when
compared to prior years. After combining the Roosevelt, Farm & Home, and Home
Federal loan portfolios which resulted in a combined portfolio approximately
five times the size of Roosevelt's March 31, 1994 portfolio (approximately
$650 million to $3.0 billion), management determined it was necessary to
substantially increase the allowance for loan losses to achieve higher and
more conservative coverage levels. Factors considered by management in
determining the necessity and amount of the provision necessary to bring the
overall allowance to the desired level were i) the need to conform Farm &
Home's coverage ratio (ratio of allowance for loan losses to total gross
loans) of .24% at December 31, 1993, to that of Roosevelt's which was .61% at
the comparable date. This resulted in an additional required provision of
approximately $7.3 million, ii) the previously discussed five fold increase in
the size of the overall loan portfolio coupled with the fact that, at the
time, Roosevelt management had no previous track record of managing a
portfolio of that size, and iii) the Farm & Home and Home Federal mergers
effectively doubled the overall size of the entity resulting in the Company
moving up to a new peer group whose average allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of total loans far exceeded the allowances of the unadjusted
combined entity. Also, since just prior to the merger, both Farm & Home and
Roosevelt had recently been through examinations by the OTS, the Company
initiated conversations with the OTS to obtain their concurrence with the
planned addition to the allowance for loan losses. Such concurrence was
received and the resulting $11.4 million provision was recorded.
Real Estate Owned--Real estate owned includes properties acquired through
foreclosure and properties acquired for development and sale. Real estate
acquired through foreclosure is transferred to real estate owned at the lower
of cost or estimated fair value, which represents the new recorded basis of
the property. Subsequently, properties are evaluated and any additional
declines in value are provided for in an allowance for losses on real estate.
Real estate acquired for development and sale is carried at the lower of cost
or estimated fair value.
While the valuation allowances for losses on loans, foreclosed assets, and
real estate acquired for development and sale are considered adequate, the
Company's allowances are subject to review by the FDIC and OTS. In the course
of their periodic examinations the Company may be instructed to establish
additional general or specific reserves in addition to the amounts previously
established.
67
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Company's allowance for
loan losses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
------------------- ------------------- ---------------------------
CATEGORY'S CATEGORY'S CATEGORY'S
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL
AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT
------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of
period................. $22,915 $ 9,056 $10,753 $ 9,063
Charge-offs:
Residential........... 3,177 358 824 468
Commercial real
estate............... 155 696 1,535 1,611
Consumer.............. 114 33 169 66
Construction.......... 87 -- -- --
------- ------- ------- -------
3,533 1,087 2,528 2,145
------- ------- ------- -------
Recoveries:
Residential........... 3 16 -- --
Commercial real
estate............... 74 5 125 21
Consumer.............. 30 10 -- 184
Construction.......... -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- -------
107 31 125 205
------- ------- ------- -------
Net charge-offs..... 3,426 1,056 2,403 1,940
Additions charged to
operations............. 1,200 12,432 706 2,648
Additions acquired
through acquisitions... 1,166 2,483 -- 982
------- ------- ------- -------
Balance at end of
period................. $21,855 $22,915 $ 9,056 $10,753
======= ======= ======= =======
Ratio of net charge-offs
during the period to
average loans
outstanding during the
period................. .10% .04% .09% .13%
======= ======= ======= =======
Allowance distribution:
Residential........... $17,309 92.4% $17,570 92.5% $ 4,245 89.8% $ 4,208
Commercial real
estate............... 4,220 3.8 4,776 4.2 4,463 5.2 5,835
Consumer.............. 326 3.5 410 2.7 348 1.5 710
Construction.......... -- .3 159 .6 -- 3.5 --
------- ----- ------- ----- ------- ----- -------
$21,855 100.0% $22,915 100.0% $ 9,056 100.0% $10,753
======= ===== ======= ===== ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
68
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1992 1991
---------- ------------------
CATEGORY'S CATEGORY'S
PERCENT PERCENT
OF TOTAL OF TOTAL
LOANS AMOUNT LOANS
---------- ------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period.................. $8,107
Charge-offs:
Residential................................... 995
Commercial real estate........................ 743
Consumer...................................... 171
Construction.................................. --
------
1,909
------
Recoveries:
Residential................................... --
Commercial real estate........................ --
Consumer...................................... 29
Construction.................................. --
------
29
------
Net charge-offs............................. 1,880
Additions charged to operations................. 2,695
Additions acquired through acquisitions......... 141
------
Balance at end of period........................ $9,063
======
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to
average loans outstanding during the period.... .10%
======
Allowance distribution:
Residential................................... 88.4% $3,143 88.5%
Commercial real estate........................ 5.5 5,477 4.7
Consumer...................................... 1.6 443 1.6
Construction.................................. 4.5 -- 5.2
----- ------ -----
100.0% $9,063 100.0%
===== ====== =====
</TABLE>
DEPOSITS AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS
Deposit accounts have traditionally been a principal source of the Company's
funds for use in lending and for other general business purposes. In addition
to deposits, the Company derives funds from loan repayments, loan sales, cash
flows generated from operations (including interest credited to deposit
accounts), net deposit inflows, FHLB advances, and collateralized borrowings.
Borrowings may be used on a short-term basis to compensate for seasonal
reductions in deposits or for deposit inflows at less than projected levels
and may be used on a longer term basis to support expanded lending activities.
The availability of funds from loan sales is influenced by general interest
rates.
Deposits--The Company attracts both short-term and long-term deposits from
the general public by offering a wide assortment of accounts and rates. The
Company offers regular passbook accounts, checking accounts, various money
market accounts, fixed interest rate certificates with varying maturities,
negotiated rate certificates of deposit in minimum amounts of $100,000
("Jumbo" accounts), and individual retirement accounts. The Company does not
generally seek to attract Jumbo accounts or brokered deposits.
The Company's variety of deposit accounts has allowed it to remain
competitive and respond to changes in consumer demands. The Company has become
more subject to short-term fluctuations in deposit flows, as many customers
have become more interest rate conscious. The ability of the Company to
attract and maintain deposits, which affects its cost of funds, will continue
to be significantly affected by market conditions.
69
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the deposit flows of Roosevelt during the
periods indicated. Net withdrawals refers to the amount of deposits (exclusive
of interest credited) during a period less the amount of withdrawals during
the period. The net withdrawals during 1995, 1994, and 1993 reflect
management's strategy of conservatively pricing most deposits to better
control Roosevelt's cost of funds and a general trend in the industry of
deposit outflows caused by depositors seeking improved yields in a relatively
low interest rate environment. Deposit flows at savings institutions may also
be influenced by external factors such as governmental credit policies.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net withdrawals.......................... $ (346,551) $ (711,218) $ (580,974)
Deposits assumed from acquisitions....... 182,566 468,877 1,431,501
Deposits sold............................ -- (68,134) (277,182)
Deposit change from branch exchange...... -- -- 63,944
Interest credited........................ 172,774 132,330 147,989
Unearned discount on brokered
certificates............................ (117) -- --
Net adjustment related to purchase method
of accounting........................... (564) (3,962) (4,763)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net increase (decrease) in deposits...... 8,108 (182,107) 780,515
Beginning balance........................ 4,899,389 5,081,496 4,300,981
---------- ---------- ----------
Ending balance........................... $4,907,497 $4,899,389 $5,081,496
========== ========== ==========
Percent increase (decrease)............ 0.2% (3.6)% 18.1%
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
Borrowings--Roosevelt's other sources of funds include advances from the
FHLB of Des Moines, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and
longer-term borrowings such as its mortgage-backed bonds and subordinated
notes. These borrowings totaled $2.4 billion, $1.1 billion and $47.5 million
and $1.7 billion, $1.2 billion and $47.4 million at December 31, 1995 and
1994, respectively.
As a member of the FHLB of Des Moines, the Company is required to own
capital stock in the FHLB of Des Moines and is authorized to apply for
advances from the FHLB of Des Moines. All long-term FHLB advances must be for
the purpose of financing residential housing. Members must meet community
lending standards established by Federal Housing Finance Board ("FHFB")
regulations to have continued access to long-term FHLB advances. The Company
does not expect that these limitations will have a significant impact on its
access to long-term advances. Each FHLB credit program has its own interest
rate, which may be fixed or variable, and range of maturities. The FHLB of Des
Moines may prescribe additional acceptable uses to which these advances may be
put, as well as limitations on the size of the advances and repayment
provisions. See "Regulation--Federal Home Loan Bank System."
The form of agreement to repurchase securities sold used by the Company is a
sale of securities to primary dealers with a commitment to repurchase
securities at a predetermined price at a future date, typically ranging
between 30 days and 90 days from the date of the initial sale. The Company may
substantially increase its borrowings under agreements to repurchase
securities sold.
See Notes 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Notes to "Financial Statements of Roosevelt
Financial Group, Inc.--Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent
Auditor's Report for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995" for
further information regarding deposits and other borrowings.
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
The long-term profitability of the Company depends not only on the success
of the services it offers to its customers and the quality of its loans and
investments, but also the extent to which its earnings and net market value
are affected by changes in interest rates. Roosevelt's asset and liability
management strategy attempts to reduce the variability in net interest income
and net market value caused by interest rate changes.
70
<PAGE>
One means of reducing the effect of interest rate volatility on net interest
income is to shorten asset maturities. In recent years, Roosevelt has
attempted to do this by emphasizing the origination and purchase of
adjustable-rate mortgage loans and the purchase of adjustable-rate mortgage-
backed securities. In addition to the origination and purchase of adjustable-
rate loans and investments discussed above, the Company will also utilize
derivative financial instruments; such as interest exchange agreements,
interest rate cap and floor agreements and, to a much lesser extent, interest
rate futures contracts to help manage its interest rate risk.
At December 31, 1995, interest-sensitive assets of $6.1 billion and
interest-sensitive liabilities of $6.2 billion were scheduled to mature or
reprice within one year. A conventional measure of interest rate sensitivity
for thrift institutions is to divide the difference between assets maturing or
repricing within one year and total liabilities maturing or repricing within
one year by total assets--"one year gap". Such gap at December 31, 1995 was a
negative 0.50%. At December 31, 1995, Roosevelt had entered into interest rate
exchange agreements and interest rate cap and floor agreements with notional
values of $1.2 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively. Without these
instruments Roosevelt's one year gap at December 31, 1995 would have been a
negative 1.51%. See "Business--Roosevelt's Philosophy and Operating Strategy",
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.--Asset/Liability Management" and
Note 15 to "Financial Statements of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.--
Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report for the
Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995" for further information
regarding the Company's interest rate risk management practices.
SUBSIDIARIES
Roosevelt is permitted, through the Bank, to invest in the capital stock,
obligations, or other specified types of securities of subsidiaries (referred
to as "service corporations") and to make loans to such subsidiaries, and
joint ventures in which such subsidiaries are participants, in an aggregate
amount not exceeding 2% of the Bank's assets. The Bank may invest an
additional 1% of its assets in service corporation activities that serve
primarily specified community or inner-city developments. Federal regulations
also permit institutions to make specified types of loans to such service
corporation subsidiaries (other than special-purpose finance subsidiaries), in
which the institution owns more than 10% of the stock, in an aggregate amount
not exceeding 50% of the institution's regulatory capital. In addition,
federal savings associations are permitted to invest unlimited amounts in
subsidiaries that are engaged solely in activities that the association may
conduct. At December 31, 1995, the Bank's investment in service corporations
was approximately $2.3 million.
Roosevelt Financial Services, Inc. (prior to 1994 known as Roosevelt
Insurance Agency, Inc.) is a diversified general insurance agency. It provides
life, health, property, casualty, commercial insurance coverages, and tax
deferred annuities and other investment products to Roosevelt's customers and
the general public. Stocks and bonds are offered to the Bank's customers on a
discount basis through a clearing broker/dealer. Mutual funds are offered to
the Bank's customers and the general public by registered representatives
through an arrangement between Roosevelt Financial Services, Inc. and a
registered broker/dealer.
H.F.S. Corporation is a service corporation which was acquired through the
merger with Home Bancorp. H.F.S. Corporation has the authority to invest and
participate in various activities such as the acquisition and development of
property into residential building lots.
F&H Realty, a subsidiary of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc., is a Missouri-
chartered real estate investment company. It owns real estate held for
investment or for the purpose of developing and selling lots, primarily for
single-family dwellings. It was formed in December 1992 and was later
transferred to the Company under the name Farm & Home as a dividend-in-kind
from the Bank, previously known as Farm & Home Savings Association.
REGULATION
The Bank is a Federally chartered savings bank, the deposits of which are
Federally insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC and are backed by the
full faith and credit of the United States Government. Accordingly, the
71
<PAGE>
Bank is subject to broad Federal regulation and oversight extending to all its
operations. The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Des Moines and is subject to
certain limited regulation by the Federal Reserve Board. As the savings and
loan holding company of the Bank, Roosevelt is also subject to Federal
regulation and oversight. The purpose of this regulation of Roosevelt and
other holding companies is to protect subsidiary savings associations. Certain
of these regulatory requirements and restrictions are discussed below and
elsewhere in this document.
FEDERAL REGULATION OF SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS
The OTS, as the primary Federal regulatory agency, and the FDIC, as insurer
and back-up regulator, have extensive supervisory authority over the
operations of savings associations. The Bank is required to file periodic
reports with the OTS and may be examined periodically by the OTS and FDIC. The
Bank was most recently examined by the OTS and the FDIC in April, 1995. All
Federally insured savings associations are subject to an on-site, full-scope
examination by either the FDIC or the OTS at least once every 12 months. All
savings associations are subject to an annual assessment to fund the
operations of the OTS. The general assessment, to be paid on a semi-annual
basis, is computed based upon the savings association's total assets, as
reported in the association's latest quarterly thrift financial report. The
Bank's OTS assessment for 1995 was $1.2 million.
The OTS' pervasive regulatory authority is backed by extensive enforcement
authority over all savings associations and their holding companies, including
the Bank and Roosevelt. This enforcement authority includes among other
things, the ability to impose operational restrictions, to commence cease-and-
desist proceedings, to assess civil money penalties and to initiate
proceedings to remove individuals from their positions and prohibit them from
service with any savings association. Such actions may generally be initiated
to prevent, terminate or remedy violations of laws, regulations or unsafe or
unsound practices. Additional grounds include failure to file accurate and
timely reports with the OTS.
In addition, the investment, lending and branching authority of the Bank is
prescribed by Federal laws and regulations, and it is prohibited from engaging
in any activities not permitted by such laws and regulations. For instance, no
savings institution may invest in non-investment grade corporate debt
securities. In addition, the permissible level of investment by Federal
associations in loans secured by non-residential real property may not exceed
400% of regulatory capital, except with approval of the OTS. The Bank is in
compliance with each of these noted restrictions.
The Bank's general permissible lending limit for loans-to-one borrower is
equal to 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus (except for loans fully secured
by certain readily marketable collateral, in which case this limit is
increased to 25% of unimpaired capital and surplus). At December 31, 1995, the
Bank's lending limit under this restriction was $80.4 million. The Bank is in
compliance with the loans-to-one borrower limitation.
The OTS, as well as the other Federal banking agencies, have adopted
guidelines establishing safety and soundness standards. Any institution which
fails to comply with these standards must submit a compliance plan. A failure
to submit a plan or to comply with an approved plan will subject the
institution to further enforcement action. The OTS and the other Federal
banking agencies have also proposed additional guidelines on asset quality and
earnings standards. No assurance can be given as to the final form of the
proposed guidelines.
INSURANCE OF ACCOUNTS AND REGULATION BY THE FDIC
The Bank is a member of the SAIF, which is administered by the FDIC. Savings
deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC and such insurance is
backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. As
insurer, the FDIC assesses deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to
conduct examinations of and to require reporting by FDIC insured institutions.
It may also prohibit any FDIC insured institution from engaging in any
activity the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious risk to
the FDIC. The FDIC also has the authority to initiate enforcement actions
against savings associations, after giving the OTS an opportunity to take such
action, and may terminate the deposit insurance if it determines that the
institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, or is
in an unsafe or unsound condition.
72
<PAGE>
The FDIC's deposit insurance premiums are assessed through a risk-based
system under which all insured depository institutions are placed into one of
nine categories and assessed insurance premiums based on their level of
capital and supervisory evaluation. The assessment schedule for Bank Insurance
Fund (BIF) and SAIF insured institutions ranged from .23% to .31% of deposits
during the first half of 1995. Under this system, institutions classified as
well capitalized (i.e., a core capital ratio of at least 5%, a ratio of Tier 1
or core capital to risk-weighted assets (Tier 1 risk-based capital) of at
least 6% and a risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%) and considered
healthy would pay the lowest premium while institutions that are less than
adequately capitalized (i.e., core or Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios of less
than 4% or a risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%) and considered of
substantial supervisory concern would pay the highest premium. Risk
classification of all insured institutions will be made by the FDIC for each
semi-annual assessment period.
The FDIC is authorized to increase such assessment rates, on a semiannual
basis, if it determines that the reserve ratio of the SAIF will be less than
the designated reserve ratio of 1.25% of SAIF insured deposits. In setting
these increased assessments, the FDIC must seek to restore the reserve ratio
to that designated reserve level, or such higher reserve ratio as established
by the FDIC. In addition the FDIC may impose special assessments on SAIF
members to repay amounts borrowed from the United States Treasury or for any
other reason deemed necessary by the FDIC.
The deposits of Roosevelt Bank are presently insured by the SAIF, which
together with the BIF are the two insurance funds administered by the FDIC. As
a result of the BIF reaching its statutory reserve ratio, the FDIC revised the
premium schedule for BIF insured institutions to provide a range of .04% to
.31% of deposits. The revisions became effective in the third quarter of 1995.
The BIF premium schedule was further revised, effective January 1996, to
provide a range of 0% to .27% with an annual minimum assessment of $2,000,
essentially eliminating deposit insurance premiums for many BIF-insured
institutions. As a result of these adjustments, BIF insured institutions now
generally pay lower premiums than SAIF insured institutions. At the time the
FDIC revised the BIF premium schedule, it noted that, absent legislative
action (as discussed below), the SAIF would not attain its designated reserve
ratio until the year 2002. As a result, SAIF insured members would continue to
be generally subject to higher deposit insurance premiums than BIF insured
institutions until, all things being equal, the SAIF attains its required
reserve ratio.
In order to help eliminate this disparity and any competitive disadvantage
between BIF and SAIF member institutions with respect to deposit insurance
premiums, legislation to recapitalize the SAIF was enacted in September 1996.
The legislation provides for a one-time assessment to be imposed on all
deposits assessed at the SAIF rates, as of March 31, 1995, in order to
recapitalize the SAIF. It also provides for the merger of the BIF and the SAIF
on January 1, 1999 if no savings associations then exist. The FDIC has
announced that the special assessment rate is anticipated to be .657% and will
be payable by November 27, 1996. Based on Roosevelt Bank's level of SAIF
deposits at March 31, 1995 (including the effect of the acquisitions of
Kirksville Federal Savings Bank ("Kirksville Bank"), Washington Savings Bank,
FSB, ("Washington Savings"), Sentinel Federal and Mutual Savings Bank, f.s.b.
("Mutual Bank"), and assuming a special assessment of .657%, Roosevelt Bank's
assessment would be approximately $27.4 million on a pre-tax basis. If such
special assessment had been recorded as of June 30, 1996, on a pro forma basis
(including the effect of Sentinel Federal and Mutual Bank), the tangible, core
and risk-based capital ratios would have been 5.33%, 5.35% and 13.76%,
respectively. Accordingly, this special assessment will significantly increase
noninterest expense and adversely affect Roosevelt Bank's results of
operations for the quarter ended September 30, 1996. Prior to the enactment of
the legislation, a portion of the SAIF assessment imposed on savings
associations was used to repay obligations issued by a federally chartered
corporation to provide financing ("FICO") for resolving the thrift crisis in
the 1980s. Although the FDIC has proposed that the SAIF assessment schedule be
equalized with the BIF assessment schedule, effective October 1, 1996, SAIF-
insured institutions will continue to be subject to a FICO assessment as a
result of this continuing obligation. Although the legislation also now
requires assessments to be made on BIF-assessable deposits for this purpose,
effective January 1, 1997 that assessment will be limited to 20% of the rate
imposed on SAIF assessable deposits until the earlier of December 31, 1999 or
when no savings association continues to exist, thereby imposing a greater
burden on SAIF member institutions such as Roosevelt Bank.
73
<PAGE>
Thereafter, however, assessments on BIF-member institutions will be made on
the same basis as SAIF-member institutions. The rates to be established by the
FDIC to implement this requirement for all FDIC-insured institutions is
uncertain at this time.
The United States Congress has also considered legislation that would
require all Federal thrift institutions, such as Roosevelt Bank, to either
convert to a national bank or a state chartered financial institution. If such
legislation were enacted, Roosevelt would no longer be regulated as a thrift
holding company, but rather as a bank holding company. The OTS would be
abolished and its functions transferred among the other federal banking
regulators. No assurance can be given as to whether or in what form the
legislation will be enacted or its effect on Roosevelt and Roosevelt Bank.
REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Federally insured savings associations, such as the Bank, are required to
maintain a minimum level of regulatory capital. The OTS has established
capital standards, including a tangible capital requirement, a leverage ratio
(or core capital) requirement and a risk-based capital requirement applicable
to such savings associations. Under Federal law all three requirements must be
generally as stringent as the comparable capital requirements for national
banks.
Tangible Capital--The capital regulations require tangible capital of at
least 1.5% of adjusted total assets (as defined by regulation). Tangible
capital generally includes common stockholders' equity and retained income and
certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock. In addition, all intangible
assets, other than a limited amount of purchased mortgage servicing rights,
must be deducted from tangible capital.
The OTS regulations establish special tangible capital requirements for
savings associations that own subsidiaries. In determining compliance with the
capital requirements, all subsidiaries engaged solely in activities
permissible for national banks or engaged in certain other activities solely
as an agent for its customers, are "includable" subsidiaries that are
consolidated for capital purposes in proportion to the association's level of
ownership, including the assets of includable subsidiaries in which the
association has a minority interest that are not consolidated for generally
accepted accounting principles. For excludable subsidiaries, the debt and
equity investments in such subsidiaries must be deducted from assets and
capital. The Bank, at December 31, 1995, had a $2.3 million net investment in
subsidiaries which the Bank deducted from capital for the purpose of computing
its capital compliance.
At December 31, 1995, the Bank had tangible capital of approximately $474.7
million, or 5.26% of adjusted total assets, which is approximately $339.2
million above the minimum requirement of 1.50% adjusted total assets in effect
on that date.
Core Capital--The capital standards also require core capital equal to at
least 3% of adjusted total assets. Core capital generally consists of tangible
capital plus certain intangible assets. At December 31, 1995, the Bank had
$2.4 million of core deposit intangibles included in core capital under these
tests and had core capital equal to approximately $477.1 million, or 5.28% of
adjusted total assets, which is $206.1 million above the minimum leverage
ratio requirement of 3% in effect on that date. As a result of the prompt
corrective action provisions discussed below, however, a savings association
must maintain a core capital level of at least 4% to be considered adequately
capitalized unless its supervisory condition is such to allow it to maintain a
3% ratio.
Risk-Based Capital--The OTS risk-based requirement requires savings
associations to have total capital of at least 8% of risk-weighted assets.
Total capital consists of core capital, as defined above, and supplementary
capital. Supplementary capital consists of certain permanent and maturing
capital instruments that do not qualify as core capital and general valuation
loan and lease loss allowances up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted
assets. Supplementary capital may be used to satisfy the risk-based
requirement only to the extent of core capital. The OTS is also authorized to
require a savings association to maintain additional risk-based capital to
account for concentration of credit risk and the risk of non-traditional
activities. At December 31, 1995, the Bank did not
74
<PAGE>
have any capital instruments that qualified as supplementary capital and had
$18.6 million of general loss allowances, which was less than 1.25% of risk-
weighted assets.
Certain exclusions from capital and assets are required to be made for the
purpose of calculating risk-based capital, in addition to the adjustments
required for calculating core capital. Such exclusions consist of equity
investments (as defined by regulation) and that portion of land loans and
nonresidential construction loans in excess of an 80% loan-to-value ratio. In
addition, reciprocal holdings of qualifying capital instruments are excluded.
The Bank had no such exclusions from capital and assets at December 31, 1995.
In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including the
credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance sheet items, will be
multiplied by a risk weight ranging from 0% to 100% based on the risks
inherent in the type of asset. For example, the OTS has assigned a risk weight
of 50% for performing and prudently underwritten permanent one- to four-family
first mortgage loans not more than 90 days past due and with a loan-to-value
ratio of not more than 80% at origination unless insured to such ratio by an
insurer approved by the FNMA or FHLMC.
On December 31, 1995, the Bank had total risk-weighted capital of
approximately $495.7 million (including $18.6 million of general loss
allowances). The Bank had risk-weighted assets of $3.3 billion (including
$232.2 million in credit equivalent amounts of converted off-balance sheet
items) for total risk-weighted capital of 14.60% of risk-weighted assets. This
amount was approximately $224.1 million above the 8% requirement in effect on
that date.
Every savings association with more than normal interest rate risk is
required to deduct from its total capital, for purposes of determining
compliance with such requirement, an amount equal to 50% of its interest-rate
risk exposure multiplied by the present value of its assets. This exposure is
a measure of the potential decline in the net portfolio value of a savings
association, greater than 2% of the present value of its assets, based upon a
hypothetical 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates (whichever
results in a greater decline). Net portfolio value is the present value of
expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.
The regulation provides for a two quarter lag between calculating interest
rate risk and recognizing any deduction from capital. The OTS recently
announced that it will delay the effective date of the regulation until it
evaluates the process by which an association may appeal an interest-rate risk
capital deduction determination. If the regulation had been in effect at
December 31, 1995, the Bank would have had no such deduction from total
capital on such date.
The OTS and the FDIC are authorized and, under certain circumstances
required, to take certain actions against associations that fail to meet their
capital requirements. The OTS is generally required to take action to restrict
the activities of an "undercapitalized association" (generally defined to be
one with less than a 4% core and Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios and less
than an 8% risk-based capital ratio). Any such association must submit a
capital restoration plan and until such plan is approved by the OTS may not
increase it assets, acquire another institution, establish a branch or engage
in any new activities, and generally may not make capital distributions. The
OTS is authorized to impose the additional restrictions, discussed below, that
are applicable to significantly undercapitalized associations.
As a condition to the approval of the capital restoration plan, any company
controlling an undercapitalized association must agree that it will enter into
a limited capital maintenance guarantee with respect to the institution's
achievement of its capital requirements. In any bankruptcy proceedings by
Roosevelt, any claim against Roosevelt under such a guarantee would have
priority over the claims of unsecured creditors.
Any savings association that fails to comply with its capital plan or is
"significantly undercapitalized" (i.e., Tier 1 risk-based or core capital
ratios of less than 3% or a risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%) must be
subjected by the OTS to one or more of a number of additional specified
actions and operating restrictions which may cover all aspects of its
operations and include a forced merger or acquisition of the association. An
association that becomes "critically undercapitalized" (i.e., a tangible
capital ratio of 2% or less) is subject to
75
<PAGE>
further mandatory restrictions on its activities in addition to those
applicable to significantly undercapitalized associations. In addition, the
OTS must appoint a receiver (or conservator with the concurrence of the FDIC)
for a savings association, with certain limited exceptions, within 90 days
after it becomes critically undercapitalized.
The OTS is also generally authorized to reclassify an association into a
lower capital category and impose the restrictions applicable to such category
if the OTS determines that an association is in an unsafe or unsound condition
or is engaged in an unsafe or unsound practice.
The imposition by the OTS of any of these measures on the Bank may have
substantial adverse effect on the Bank's operations and profitability and the
value of Roosevelt's common and preferred stock. Roosevelt stockholders do not
have preemptive rights, and therefore, if Roosevelt is directed by the OTS or
the FDIC to issue additional shares of common or preferred stock, such
issuance may result in the dilution in the percentage of ownership of the
stockholders of Roosevelt.
LIMITATIONS ON DIVIDENDS AND OTHER CAPITAL DISTRIBUTIONS
OTS regulations impose various restrictions on associations, including the
Bank, with respect to their ability to make capital distributions, which
include dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers,
interest payments on certain convertible debt, and other transactions charged
to the capital account. As of December 31, 1995, the Bank would have been
permitted to pay dividends of $166.6 million consistent with these
restrictions, subject to giving the notice referred to below and receiving no
objection from the OTS.
Generally, associations such as the Bank that before and after the proposed
distribution meet or exceed their capital requirements, may make capital
distributions during any calendar year up to the greater of 100% of net income
for the year-to-date plus 50% of the amount by which the lesser of the
association's tangible, core, or risk-based capital exceeds its requirement
for such capital component, as measured at the beginning of the calendar year,
or 75% of net income for the most recent four quarter period. However, an
association deemed to be in need of more than normal supervision by the OTS
may have its dividend authority restricted.
Associations proposing to make any capital distribution must submit written
notice to the OTS 30 days prior to such distribution. Associations that do not
meet minimum capital requirements that propose to make any capital
distribution must obtain OTS approval prior to making such distributions. The
OTS may object to the distribution during that 30-day period based on safety
and soundness concerns.
Finally, OTS regulations prohibit an association from declaring or paying
any dividends or from repurchasing any of its stock, if as a result, the net
worth of the association would be reduced below the amount required to be
maintained for the liquidation account established in connection with its
mutual stock conversion.
The OTS has proposed regulations that would revise the current capital
distribution restrictions. Under the proposal a savings association may make a
capital distribution without notice to the OTS (unless it is a subsidiary of a
holding company) provided that it has a CAMEL 1 or 2 rating, is not of
supervisory concern and would remain adequately capitalized (as defined in the
OTS prompt corrective action regulations) following the proposed distribution.
Savings associations that would remain adequately capitalized following the
proposed distribution but do not meet the other noted requirements must notify
the OTS 30 days prior to declaring a capital distribution. The OTS stated,
however, it will generally regard as permissible that amount of capital
distributions that do not exceed 50% of the institution's excess regulatory
capital plus net income to date during the calendar year. A savings
association may not make a capital distribution without prior approval of the
OTS and the FDIC if it is undercapitalized before, or as a result of, such a
distribution. As under the current rule, the OTS may object to a capital
distribution if it would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. No
assurance may be given as to whether or in what form the proposed regulations
may be adopted.
76
<PAGE>
LIQUIDITY
Each savings association, including the Bank, is required to maintain an
average daily balance of liquid assets equal to a certain percentage of the
sum of its average daily balance of net withdrawable deposit accounts and
borrowings payable in one year or less. This liquid asset ratio requirement
may vary from time to time (between 4% an 10%) depending on the economic
conditions and savings flows of all savings associations. At the present time,
the minimum liquid asset ratio is 5%.
In addition, short-term liquid assets (e.g., cash, certain time deposits,
certain bankers' acceptances and short-term United States Treasury
obligations) currently must constitute at least 1% of an association's average
daily balance of net withdrawable deposit accounts and current borrowings.
Penalties may be imposed upon associations for violations of either liquid
asset ratio requirement. At December 31, 1995, the Bank was in compliance with
both requirements.
QUALIFIED THRIFT LENDER TEST
All savings associations, including the Bank, are required to meet a
qualified thrift lender (QTL) test to avoid certain restrictions on their
operations. The QTL test requires a savings association to have at least 65%
of its portfolio assets (which consist of total assets less intangibles,
properties used to conduct the savings association's business and liquid
assets not exceeding 20% of total assets) in qualified thrift investments and
to meet that test on a monthly average for nine out of every 12 months on a
rolling basis. Such assets primarily consist of residential housing related
loans and investments. As of December 31, 1995, the Bank had a QTL ratio of
97.8%, which was in compliance with the 65% QTL test, and has always been in
compliance with the QTL requirement.
Any savings association that fails to meet the test must convert to a
national bank charter, unless it requalifies as a QTL and thereafter remains a
QTL. If the association does not requalify and converts to a national bank
charter, it must remain SAIF insured until the FDIC permits it to transfer to
the BIF, which generally cannot occur until the SAIF reaches its designated
reserve ratio. If an association that fails the test has not yet requalified
and has not converted to a national bank, its new investments and activities
are limited to those permissible for a national bank and it is limited to
national bank branching rights in its home state. In addition, the association
is immediately ineligible to receive any new FHLB borrowings and is subject to
national bank limits for payment of dividends. If such association has not
requalified or converted to a national bank within three years after the
failure, it must divest of all investments and cease all activities not
permissible for a national bank. In addition, it must repay promptly any
outstanding FHLB borrowings, which may result in prepayment penalties. If any
association that fails the QTL test is controlled by a holding company, then
within one year after the failure, the holding company must register as a bank
holding company and become subject to all restrictions on bank holding
companies.
TRANSACTION WITH AFFILIATES
Transactions between a savings association, such as the Bank or any of its
subsidiaries, and its affiliates are subject to numerous restrictions.
Generally, such transactions must be on terms at least as favorable to the
Bank as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
nonaffiliated companies. Most transactions are also subject to quantitative
ceilings, and many must be secured by eligible collateral. In addition,
savings associations are prohibited from investing in the securities of an
affiliate (other than a subsidiary) or extending credit to an affiliate
engaged in activities not permissible for a bank holding company. For these
purposes, an affiliate is defined as a company that controls, or is under
common control with, the Bank but does not include a subsidiary of the Bank
unless specially determined by OTS or the Federal Reserve Board. None of the
Bank's subsidiaries have been so designated.
Certain transactions with directors, officers or controlling persons are
also subject to conflict of interest regulations enforced by the OTS. These
conflict of interest regulations and other statutes also impose restrictions
on loans to such persons and their related interests. Among other things, such
loans must be made on terms substantially the same as for loans to
unaffiliated individuals.
77
<PAGE>
HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION
Roosevelt is a unitary savings and loan holding company subject to
regulatory oversight by the OTS. As such, Roosevelt is required to register
and file reports with the OTS and is subject to regulation and examination by
the OTS. In addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over Roosevelt and its
non-savings association subsidiaries which also permits the OTS to restrict or
prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to any subsidiary
savings association, such as the Bank.
As a unitary savings and loan holding company, Roosevelt generally is not
subject to activity restrictions. If Roosevelt acquired control of another
savings association as a separate subsidiary, it would become a multiple
savings and loan holding company, and the activities of Roosevelt and any of
its subsidiaries (other than the Bank or any other SAIF insured savings
association) would become subject to such restrictions unless such other
associations each qualifies as a QTL and was acquired in a supervisory
acquisition.
If the Bank fails the QTL test, Roosevelt must obtain the approval of the
OTS prior to continuing after such failure, directly or through its other
subsidiaries, any business activity other than those approved for multiple
savings and loan holding companies or their subsidiaries. In addition, within
one year of such failure Roosevelt must register as, and will become subject
to, the restrictions applicable to bank holding companies. The activities
authorized for a bank holding company are more limited than are the activities
authorized for a unitary or multiple savings and loan holding company.
Roosevelt must obtain approval from the OTS before acquiring control of any
other SAIF insured association. Such acquisitions are generally prohibited if
they result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings
associations in more than one state. However, such interstate acquisitions may
be permitted based on specific state authorization or in a supervisory
acquisition of a failing savings association.
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAW
The stock of Roosevelt is registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Roosevelt is subject to the information, proxy solicitation,
insider trading restrictions and other requirements of the SEC under the
Exchange Act.
Roosevelt stock held by persons who are affiliates within the meaning of the
Exchange Act (generally officers, directors, and principal stockholders) of
Roosevelt may not be resold without registration or unless sold in accordance
with certain resale restrictions. If Roosevelt meets specified current public
information requirements, each affiliate of Roosevelt generally is able to
sell in the public market, without registration, a limited number of shares in
any three-month period.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
The Federal Reserve Board requires all depository institutions to maintain
non- interest-bearing reserves at specified levels against their transaction
accounts (primarily checking, NOW and Super NOW checking accounts). At
December 31, 1995 Roosevelt was in compliance with these reserve requirements.
The balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements imposed by the
Federal Reserve Board may be used to satisfy liquidity requirements that may
be imposed by the OTS.
Savings associations are authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank
"discount window," but Federal Reserve Board regulations require associations
to exhaust other reasonable alternative sources of funds, including FHLB
borrowings, before borrowing from the Federal Reserve Bank.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK SYSTEM
The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Des Moines which is one of 12 regional
FHLBs that regulate the home financing credit function of savings
associations. Each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its
78
<PAGE>
members within its assigned region. It is funded primarily from proceeds
derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB System. It makes
loans to members (i.e., advances) in accordance with policies and procedures
established by the board of directors of the FHLB. These policies and
procedures are subject to the regulation and oversight of the Federal Housing
Finance Board. All advances from the FHLB are required to be fully secured by
sufficient collateral as determined by the FHLB. In addition, all long-term
advances are required to provide funds for residential home financing.
As a member, the Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB
of Des Moines. At December 31, 1995 the Bank had approximately $132.0 million
in FHLB of Des Moines stock, which was in compliance with this requirement.
The FHLBs are required to provide funds for the resolution of troubled
savings associations and to contribute to low and moderately priced housing
programs through direct loans or interest subsidies on advances targeted for
community investment and low- and moderate-income housing projects. These
contributions have adversely affected the level of FHLB dividends paid and
could continue to do so in the future. For 1995 dividends paid by the FHLB of
Des Moines to the Bank totaled $8.6 million, $6.0 million paid as a cash
dividend and $2.6 million paid in the form of a stock dividend.
TAXATION
For Federal income tax purposes, Roosevelt reports its income and expenses
using the accrual method of tax accounting and uses the calendar year as its
tax year. Except for the bad debt reserve deduction Roosevelt is subject to
Federal income tax, under existing provisions of the Internal Revenue Service
Code, in generally the same manner as other corporations.
Missouri-based thrift institutions, such as the Bank, are subject to a
special financial institutions tax, based on net income without regard to net
operating loss carryforwards, at the rate of 7% of net income. This tax is in
lieu of all other state taxes on thrift institutions, on their property,
capital or income.
As a Delaware business corporation, Roosevelt is required to file annual
returns with and pay annual fees to the State of Delaware. Roosevelt is also
subject to an annual franchise tax imposed by the State of Delaware based on
the number of authorized shares of its common stock. If and to the extent
Roosevelt carries on activities in other states, it may in certain
circumstances be subject to such states' tax laws.
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT
The Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") requires financial institutions
regulated by the Federal financial supervisory agencies to ascertain and help
meet the credit needs of their delineated communities, including low-income
and moderate-income neighborhoods within those communities, while maintaining
safe and sound banking practices. The agencies evaluate an institution's CRA
performance based on a four-tiered descriptive rating system and are required
to make public an institution's rating and written evaluation. The four
possible ratings of meeting community credit needs are outstanding,
satisfactory, needs to improve, and substantial noncompliance.
Many factors play a role in assessing a financial institution's CRA
performance. The institution's regulator must consider its financial capacity
and size, legal impediments, local economic conditions and demographics,
including the competitive environment in which it operates. The evaluation
does not rely on absolute standards and the institutions are not required to
perform specific activities or to provide specific amounts or types of credit.
During 1995, the Bank received a satisfactory rating from the OTS. This
rating reflects Roosevelt's commitment to meeting the credit needs of the
communities it serves. The Bank maintains a CRA statement for public viewing,
as well as an annual CRA highlights document. These documents describe the
Bank's credit programs and services, community outreach activities, public
comments and other efforts to meet community credit needs.
79
<PAGE>
COMPETITION
The Company faces strong competition both in originating real estate and
other loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating real estate
loans comes primarily from other savings institutions, commercial banks, and
mortgage bankers making loans secured by real estate located in the Company's
market area. Commercial banks and finance companies, including finance company
affiliates of automobile manufacturers, provide vigorous competition in
consumer lending. The Company competes for real estate and other loans
principally on the basis of the interest rates and loan fees it charges, the
types of loans it originates, and the quality of services it provides to
borrowers.
The Company faces substantial competition in attracting deposits from other
savings institutions, commercial banks, money market and mutual funds, credit
unions, and other investment vehicles. The ability of the Company to attract
and retain deposits depends on its ability to provide investment opportunities
that satisfy the requirements of investors as to rate of return, liquidity,
risk, and other factors. The Company attracts a significant amount of deposits
through its branch offices, primarily from the communities in which those
branch offices are located; therefore, competition for those deposits is
principally from other savings institutions and commercial banks located in
the same communities. The Company competes for these deposits by offering a
variety of deposit accounts at competitive rates, convenient business hours,
and convenient branch locations with interbranch deposit and withdrawal
privileges at each.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 1995, the Company had a total of 1245 employees, including
171 part-time employees. None of the Company's employees are represented by a
collective bargaining group. Management considers its employee relations to be
good.
PROPERTIES OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
The Company's home office, which is a leased facility, is located in
Chesterfield, Missouri. The Company's mortgage loan servicing office is
located in Nevada, Missouri and is owned by the Company. In addition to these,
the company has an additional 77 branch offices, of which 73 are located in
the State of Missouri, three are located in the State of Illinois, and one is
located in the State of Kansas. 37 of these offices are located in the
St. Louis metropolitan area of which 28 branches are owned by the Company and
9 are leased. The leases expire from 1996 through 2010. Nine of these offices
are located in the Kansas City metropolitan area of which four branches are
owned by the Company and five are leased. The leases expire from 1997 to 2014.
The remaining 31 offices are located in Staunton, Illinois and Pittsburgh,
Kansas and the Missouri cities of Hannibal(2), Springfield(3), Columbia,
Union, Warrenton, St. James, Washington, Sikeston, Dexter, Malden, Poplar
Bluff, Hayti, Portageville, Cape Girardeau, Mexico, Jefferson City, Trenton,
Marshall, Sedalia, Clinton, Maryville, St. Joseph, Lamar, Joplin(2) and
Kirksville. 24 of these offices are owned by the Company and seven offices are
leased. The leases expire from 1996 through 2009. The Company's net investment
in its home and branch offices, premises, equipment, and leaseholds was $52.5
million at December 31, 1995.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND ROOSEVELT BANK
Roosevelt has certain litigation and claims in process resulting from
activities arising from normal operations. In the opinion of management, none
of these matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial
position.
Among the matters referred to above and as a result of the acquisition of
Farm & Home which was completed in June 1994, the Company has become successor
to certain legal proceedings which involved Farm & Home. The following is a
discussion of such proceedings. Prior to 1985, the Southbend Subdivision was
80
<PAGE>
developed by Farm & Home Savings and a co-developer on property owned by Farm
& Home Savings adjacent to a toxic waste disposal site near Houston, Texas
(the Brio Site). As a result of action by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (the EPA), a task force made up of eleven major corporations that
contributed waste to the site (the Brio Site Task Force) agreed in 1989 to
remediate the Brio Site, including any off-site contamination related to the
Brio Site. It is anticipated that once a final remediation plan is approved,
the Brio Site Task Force will be responsible for carrying out the planned
remediation. Neither Farm & Home, Farm & Home Savings nor the Company has ever
been a member of the Brio Site Task Force, nor has the EPA, to date,
designated any of them a "potentially responsible party" with respect to the
Brio Site or any remediation thereof.
Farm & Home Savings has been named in a number of lawsuits by various
parties claiming personal injury and property damage from exposure to the Brio
Site wastes as a result of Farm & Home's development of Southbend Subdivision.
These claims have involved homeowners and their children who lived in the
Southbend Subdivision as well as others who have visited the subdivision or
attended Weber Elementary School, which was located within the Southbend
Subdivision, and others who either played on ball fields that were in close
proximity to the subdivision or in some cases lived in neighboring
subdivisions (the Claims). Pursuant to a Release and Settlement Agreement
entered into in May 1987 (the 1987 Settlement Agreement), United States Fire
Insurance Company, North River Insurance Company and Commonwealth Lloyds
Insurance Company of Texas (the Insurance Companies) have been defending and
indemnifying Farm & Home Savings (and the Company as successor to Farm & Home
Savings) against the Claims. The 1987 Settlement Agreement provided that in
consideration of Farm & Home Savings' payment to the Insurance Companies of
$12.5 million the Insurance Companies would defend and pay on behalf of Farm &
Home Savings all damages and settlements (without limitation as to time frame
or dollar amount) arising out of past, present and future claims and demands
in connection with the Southbend Subdivision's proximity to the Brio Site, and
also arising out of, resulting from, or relating to the alleged hazardous
wastes at the Brio Site. In the course of defending Farm & Home Savings
against the Claims, a further dispute arose between Farm & Home Savings and
the Insurance Companies arising out of the Insurance Companies' demand that
Farm & Home Savings contribute toward the Insurance Companies' program of
purchasing all of the residential lots and homes in the Southbend Subdivision.
This dispute was resolved following litigation on March 30, 1993 pursuant to a
second settlement agreement (the 1993 Settlement Agreement, and, together with
the 1987 Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Agreements). Under the terms of
the 1993 Settlement Agreement the parties affirmed that the 1987 Settlement
Agreement remains in full force and effect and the Insurance Companies agreed
to assume the exclusive obligation and responsibility for acquiring the lots
and homes in the Southbend Subdivision. In addition, Farm & Home Savings
agreed to pay the Insurance Companies a total of $9.7 million over four years.
Farm & Home's costs associated with the 1993 Settlement Agreement have been
reflected in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 1992.
Thereafter, the Insurance Companies issued a reservation of rights with
respect to certain Claims filed in 1993. As a result of this reservation, Farm
& Home Savings initiated a declaratory judgement action regarding the
Insurance Companies' obligations under the 1987 Settlement Agreement. This
declaratory judgement action has been terminated pursuant to a further
settlement agreement between the Company and the Insurance Companies by which
the Insurance Companies have agreed to continue to defend and indemnify the
Company against all pending Claims, subject to the Insurance Companies' right
to reassert their reservation of rights in the future.
Currently, there are approximately nine hundred Claims pending against Farm
& Home Savings involving the Southbend Subdivision and/or the Brio Site, and
it is possible that in the future additional claims may be filed by others.
While the outcome of the Claims and any future claims cannot be predicted with
certainty, based upon consultation with outside counsel, it is the belief of
the Company that, pursuant to the Settlement Agreements, the Insurance
Companies are responsible for the payment of all Claims and that the risk of
significant loss to the Company related thereto would be remote.
81
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
COMPARISON OF YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994 AND 1993
GENERAL
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Roosevelt, and with
reference to the discussion of the operations and other financial information
presented elsewhere in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
The Company's consolidated financial statements have been significantly
impacted by its acquisition activity, particularly in 1994 and 1993. In 1995,
the Company completed two additional acquisitions which did not have a
significant impact on the 1995 consolidated financial statements. See Note 2
of "Financial Statements of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.--Consolidated
Financial Statements and Independent Auditors' Report for the Years Ended
December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995" and "Business of Roosevelt Financial Group,
Inc. --Acquisitions" for further discussion.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Roosevelt's operating results depend primarily upon its net interest income,
which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest
earning assets (loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities)
and the interest expense paid on its interest bearing liabilities (deposits
and borrowings). Operating results are also significantly affected by
provisions for losses on loans, noninterest income and noninterest expense.
Each of these factors is significantly affected not only by Roosevelt's
policies, but, to varying degrees, by general economic and competitive
conditions and by policies of Federal regulatory authorities.
Roosevelt reported net income of $27.1 million for 1995 compared with $41.7
million for 1994 and $44.9 million for 1993. Net income on a fully diluted per
share basis was $0.56 for 1995 compared with $.96 for 1994 and $1.11 for 1993.
Net income for 1995 was negatively impacted by losses resulting from the mark
to market of the Company's financial futures positions used to reduce the
interest rate risk of certain mortgage-backed securities in the available for
sale portfolio totaling $71.0 million ($45.1 million, net of income taxes) and
by a charge to earnings of $27.1 million ($17.8 million, net of income taxes)
for unrealized losses on the impairment of mortgage-backed securities. For
further discussion of financial futures, see "Results of Operations--Net Gain
(Loss) from Financial Instruments" and Note 15 to "Financial Statements of
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. --Consolidated Financial Statements and
Independent Auditor's Report for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and
1995."
Net income for 1994 was positively impacted by gains resulting from the mark
to market of the Company's financial futures positions used to reduce the
interest rate risk of certain mortgage-backed securities in the available for
sale portfolio totaling $39.5 million ($25.1 million, net of income taxes) and
negatively impacted by merger expenses related to the acquisition of Farm &
Home. The components of the merger related expenses (in millions) are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Provision for losses on loans....................................... $11.4
Net loss from financial instruments................................. 38.4
Provision for real estate losses.................................... 3.7
Compensation and employee benefits.................................. 6.3
Occupancy........................................................... 5.9
Transaction related fees............................................ 7.0
Other............................................................... 1.8
-----
Income before income tax expense and extraordinary item........... 74.5
Income tax expense.................................................. 25.0
-----
Income before extraordinary item.................................. 49.5
Extraordinary item (net of tax effect).............................. 7.8
-----
Total............................................................. $57.3
=====
</TABLE>
82
<PAGE>
In connection with the acquisition of Farm & Home and a review of the
combined loan portfolio, including the increased concentration of loans in
various geographic areas, and after discussion with the OTS regarding the
level of the allowance for loan losses as compared to a new peer group as a
result of the dramatic increase in size, management recorded an $11.4 million
addition to the allowance. Net loss from financial instruments totaled $38.4
million and included $25.6 million in loss from the sale of Farm & Home fixed-
rate mortgage- backed securities that did not meet Roosevelt's asset/liability
management objectives. In addition, $8.9 million of the loss on financial
instruments resulted from the cancellation of interest rate exchange
agreements of Farm & Home. As a result of Roosevelt's desire to accelerate the
disposition of Farm & Home's real estate owned portfolio, Roosevelt increased
its estimate of reserves required to record its real estate owned portfolio at
its estimated fair value which resulted in the additional $3.7 million
provision. Compensation and employee benefits expense totaling $6.3 million
related to the severance benefits for the Farm & Home executives and the
Missouri and Texas employees whose employment did not continue with the
combined entity after June 30, 1994. Occupancy expense totaled $5.9 million
and was comprised of losses on the termination of 11 facility leases,
including the write-off of leasehold improvements associated with the leases,
and anticipated losses on the sale of two closed branch facilities.
Transaction related fees totaled $7.0 million and included advisory, legal,
and accounting fees. Other expenses totaled $1.8 million and related to other
miscellaneous costs such as printing, travel and lodging. The extraordinary
item related to early extinguishment of debt and totaled $7.8 million, net of
applicable income taxes. Roosevelt recorded a $4.6 million loss due to the
retirement of $60.9 million of 10.125% mortgage-backed bonds. A loss of $2.6
million was recorded as a result of the redemption of Farm & Home's 13.0%
debentures. Additionally, a loss of $637,000 was recorded as a result of the
prepayment of $101.0 million of FHLB of Des Moines advances.
Net income for 1993 was impacted by $27.1 million of additional amortization
of purchased mortgage servicing rights as a result of significant loan
prepayments during the period.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income of $181.4 million for 1995 was down 2.3% from $185.7
million for 1994. The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result
of the average interest rates paid on interest bearing liabilities increasing
more than the average interest rates earned on interest earning assets. The
average rate earned on interest earning assets increased 77 basis points from
6.58% for 1994 to 7.35% for 1995. The average rate paid on interest bearing
liabilities increased 107 basis points from 4.41% for 1994 to 5.48% for 1995.
The effective net interest rate spread decreased 23 basis points from 2.29%
for 1994 to 2.06% for 1995, primarily as a result of severe retail deposit
pricing pressure (unrelated to the outright level of interest rates) in the
Company's market areas during 1995. The decrease in net interest income due to
the decreasing average spread was partially offset by a growth in interest
earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The average balance of
interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities increased 8.8% and
8.1%, respectively, during 1995 as compared to 1994.
Net interest income of $185.7 million for 1994 was up 12.2% from $165.5
million for 1993. Most of the growth in net interest income was the result of
internal growth in 1994 and the acquisition of Home Federal Bancorp of
Missouri, Inc. (Home Federal). The average balance of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities increased 17.7% and 17.6%, respectively,
during 1994 as compared to 1993. The effective net interest rate spread
decreased 11 basis points from 2.40% for 1993 to 2.29% for 1994, primarily as
a result of the narrower effective spread earned on the Company's asset growth
in 1994 compared to 1993.
83
<PAGE>
The following table presents Roosevelt's average consolidated balance sheets
and reflects the average yield on assets and the average cost of liabilities
for the periods indicated. Average rates earned and paid are derived by
dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets and liabilities,
respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------
INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST
AVERAGE INCOME/ AVERAGE AVERAGE INCOME/ AVERAGE AVERAGE INCOME/ AVERAGE
BALANCE EXPENSE RATE % BALANCE EXPENSE RATE % BALANCE EXPENSE RATE %
-------- -------- -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets
Cash equivalents....... $ 18.2 $ 1.0 5.49% $ 62.8 $ 2.4 3.82% $ 143.4 $ 4.6 3.21%
Securities held for
trading............... -- -- -- 120.6 6.5 5.39 389.6 19.5 5.01
Securities available
for sale(1)........... 1,815.2 135.4 7.46 2,035.1 137.9 6.78 716.4 47.1 6.57
Securities held to
maturity............... 3,683.1 259.3 7.04 2,939.5 179.1 6.09 2,964.1 205.7 6.94
Securities purchased
under agreement to
resell................. -- -- -- 21.7 0.9 4.15 57.5 2.1 3.65
Loans(2)(3)............. 3,301.8 252.1 7.64 2,922.9 206.5 7.06 2,611.6 207.9 7.96
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total interest-earning
assets................ 8,818.3 $647.8 7.35% 8,102.6 $533.3 6.58% 6,882.6 $486.9 7.08%
------ ----- ------ -----
Other assets............ 327.2 322.2 464.5
-------- -------- --------
$9,145.5 $8,424.8 $7,347.1
======== ======== ========
Liabilities
Deposits:
NOW and money market
accounts(4)........... $ 835.8 $ 24.5 2.93% $1,049.2 $ 25.3 2.41% $ 925.5 $ 23.7 2.56%
Passbook savings
deposits.............. 350.5 8.1 2.31 411.2 9.8 2.38 326.4 8.6 2.63
Time deposits(4)....... 3,615.7 210.3 5.82 3,552.6 173.6 4.89 3,277.6 192.2 5.86
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
4,802.0 242.9 5.06 5,013.0 208.7 4.16 4,529.5 224.5 4.96
Borrowings:
Securities sold under
agreements to
repurchase............ 1,426.1 84.5 5.93 1,193.7 53.3 4.47 1,277.5 47.8 3.74
Advances from FHLB..... 2,236.9 134.1 5.99 1,579.1 75.8 4.80 706.9 29.4 4.16
Other borrowings....... 47.4 4.9 10.34 90.5 9.8 10.83 185.0 19.7 10.65
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities........... 8,512.4 466.4 5.48 7,876.3 347.6 4.41 6,698.9 321.4 4.80
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
Other liabilities...... 178.9 143.8 299.3
-------- -------- --------
8,691.3 8,020.1 6,998.2
Stockholders' equity.... 454.2 404.7 348.9
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity.. $9,145.5 $8,424.8 $7,347.1
======== ======== ========
Net interest income..... $181.4 $185.7 $165.5
====== ====== ======
Interest rate
spread(5).............. 1.87% 2.17% 2.28%
===== ===== =====
Effective net
spread(6).............. 2.06% 2.29% 2.40%
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) The securities available for sale are included in the following table at
historical cost with the corresponding average rate calculated based upon
historical balances.
(2) Average balances include non accrual loans. Interest on such loans is
included in interest income upon receipt.
(3) Interest includes amortization of deferred loan fees.
(4) Includes the effect of interest rate exchange agreements.
(5) Equals average rate earned on all assets minus average rate paid on all
liabilities.
(6) Net interest income divided by average balance of all interest earning
assets.
At December 31, 1995, the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets
was 7.53% and the weighted average cost on interest-bearing liabilities was
5.62%.
84
<PAGE>
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income
and interest expense for major components of interest earning assets and
interest bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between changes related to
volume and those due to changes in interest rates. For each category of
interest income and interest expense, information is provided on changes
attributable to (i) changes in volume (i.e., changes in volume multiplied by
prior year rate) and (ii) changes in rate (i.e., changes in rate multiplied by
prior year volume). For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both
rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated to the change
due to rate.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1995 V. 1994 1994 V. 1993
------------------------------ ------------------------------
INCREASE TOTAL
(DECREASE) (INCREASE)
DUE TO TOTAL DUE TO TOTAL
------------------ INCREASE ------------------ INCREASE
VOLUME RATE (DECREASE) VOLUME RATE (DECREASE)
-------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Loans................. $ 26,763 $ 18,841 $ 45,604 $ 24,776 $(26,150) $ (1,374)
Securities held for
trading.............. (6,460) -- (6,460) (13,477) 415 (13,062)
Securities available
for sale............. (15,584) 13,095 (2,489) 91,067 (208) 90,859
Securities held to
maturity............. 45,560 34,534 80,094 (1,150) (25,388) (26,538)
Securities purchased
under agreements to
resell............... (887) -- (887) (1,325) 85 (1,240)
Other earning assets.. (1,792) 439 (1,353) (5,491) 3,192 (2,299)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total interest in-
come............... $ 47,600 $ 66,909 $114,509 $ 94,400 $(48,054) $ 46,346
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Interest expense:
Deposits.............. $ (8,427) $ 42,073 $ 33,646 $ 20,561 $(12,976) $ 7,585
Securities sold under
agreements to
repurchase........... 10,378 20,876 31,254 (3,137) 8,654 5,517
Advances from Federal
Home Loan Bank....... 31,582 26,685 58,267 36,335 10,019 46,354
Other borrowings...... (4,602) (326) (4,928) (9,694) (173) (9,867)
Interest rate exchange
agreements........... (1,015) 1,635 620 (6,026) (17,479) (23,505)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total interest ex-
pense.............. 27,916 90,943 118,859 38,039 (11,955) 26,084
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Change in net interest
income................. $ 19,684 $(24,034) $ (4,350) $ 56,361 $(36,099) $ 20,262
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON LOANS
The provision for losses on loans charged to earnings is based upon
management's judgement of the amount necessary to maintain the allowance for
loan losses at a level adequate to absorb probable losses. As part of the
process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses,
management performs quarterly detailed reviews to identify risks inherent in
the loan portfolio and to assess the overall quality of the portfolio as well
as to determine the amounts of allowances and provisions to be reported.
The provision for loan losses was $1.2 million for 1995, $12.4 million for
1994 and $706,000 for 1993. During the three month period ended June 30, 1994,
Roosevelt recorded an $11.7 million increase in the provision for losses on
loans. After combining the Roosevelt, Farm & Home and Home Federal loan
portfolios which resulted in a combined portfolio approximately five times the
size of Roosevelt's March 31, 1994 portfolio (approximately $650 million to
$3.0 billion), management determined it was necessary to substantially
increase the allowance for loan losses to achieve higher and more conservative
coverage levels. Factors considered by management in determining the necessity
and amount of the provision necessary to bring the overall allowance to the
desired level were i) the need to conform Farm & Home's coverage ratio (ratio
of allowance for loan losses to total gross loans) of .24% at December 31,
1993 to that of Roosevelt's which was .61% at the
85
<PAGE>
comparable date, ii) the previously discussed five fold increase in the size
of the overall loan portfolio coupled with the fact that, at the time,
Roosevelt management had no previous track record of managing a portfolio that
size and iii) the Farm & Home and Home Federal mergers effectively doubled the
overall size of the entity resulting in Roosevelt moving up to a new peer
group whose average allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans
far exceeded the allowances of the unadjusted combined entity. Also, since
just prior to the merger, both Farm & Home and Roosevelt had recently been
through examinations by the OTS, Roosevelt initiated conversations with the
OTS to obtain their concurrence with the planned addition to the allowance for
loan losses. Such concurrence was received and the resulting $11.4 million
provision was recorded.
The provision for 1995 of $1.2 million reflects a more normalized level of
provision compared to the large 1994 provision discussed above. The 1995
provision reflects the Company's strong level of reserves and overall strong
asset quality. See "Asset Quality."
NONINTEREST INCOME (LOSS)
Noninterest income (loss) was $(55.1) million for 1995 as compared to $17.3
million for 1994 and $14.3 million for 1993. The following is a discussion of
the major components of noninterest income (loss):
Retail Banking Fees--Retail banking fees are comprised of service charges
related to deposit accounts (principally returned checks and ATM fees); fees
for money orders, travelers checks, etc. and fees related to the telephone
bill paying service offered to the Bank's depositors. Retail banking fees
increased $2.0 million, or 23.0% from $8.7 million for 1994 to $10.7 million
for 1995 as a result of increases in fees for returned checks and ATM usage
driven primarily by an overall increase in the utilization of the retail
banking services offered by the Bank. Retail banking fees increased $2.4
million, or 38.7% from $6.3 million for 1993 to $8.7 million for 1994.
Approximately $2.0 million of this increase is the result of deposit
acquisitions which were integrated in the later part of 1993 and the
acquisition of Home Federal in April 1994. The remaining increase of
approximately $400,000 is attributable to an overall increase in the
utilization of the retail banking services offered by the Bank.
Insurance and Brokerage Sales Commissions--The Bank offers a broad range of
insurance and investment products, including tax deferred annuities, to the
general public and its customers through its wholly owned subsidiary,
Roosevelt Financial Services, Inc. Insurance and brokerage sales commissions
increased $968,000, or 14.8% from $6.5 million in 1994 to $7.5 million for
1995. This followed an increase of $801,000, or 14.0% from $5.7 million for
1993 to $6.5 million for 1994. The positive trend in insurance and brokerage
sales commissions is primarily the result of an increase in the sales volume
of commission generating products, principally annuities, as the Bank
successfully increases its penetration of its existing customer base as well
as attracts new customers.
Loan Servicing Fees (Expenses), Net--Loan servicing fees, which primarily
consists of loan servicing revenue, net of the amortization of purchased
mortgage servicing rights, increased $1.5 million, or 21.1% from $7.4 million
for 1994 to $8.9 million for 1995. This increase is primarily due to a gain of
$1.5 million in 1995 from the sale of $3.3 million book value of purchased
mortgage servicing rights (underlying mortgage loans had an unpaid principal
balance of approximately $471.0 million). Included in loan servicing fees for
1994 are gains from the sale of loans held for sale of $666,000. The
amortization of purchased mortgage servicing rights totaled $4.2 million and
$5.6 million for 1995 and 1994, respectively. During 1995, the balance of
mortgage loans serviced by Roosevelt for others decreased from approximately
$2.8 billion at December 31, 1994 to $2.0 billion at December 31, 1995. This
decrease resulted from the normal amortization of the principal balance of
mortgage loans outstanding and the sale of purchased mortgage servicing rights
discussed previously. Mortgage servicing operations continue to be an
important component of Roosevelt's operations and are expected to result in
increasing loan servicing fees in the future as a result of the planned
acquisition in early 1996 of several packages of mortgage servicing rights
which will add approximately $2.7 billion of mortgage loans to Roosevelt's
servicing portfolio.
86
<PAGE>
Loan servicing fees increased to $7.4 million for 1994 from an expense of
$11.1 million in 1993. The loan servicing expense for 1993 resulted from
amortization of purchased mortgage servicing rights totaling $36.2 million due
to significant prepayments of the mortgage loans being serviced. Loan
servicing fees included a gain from loans held for sale of $7.3 million for
1993.
Net Gain (Loss) from Financial Instruments--In the conduct of its business
operations, Roosevelt has determined the need to sell or terminate certain
assets, liabilities or off-balance sheet positions due to various unforeseen
events. Fundamental to the conduct of such sale or termination activities is
the effect such transactions will have on the future volatility of the
Company's net market value. Consequently, in pursuing such sale or termination
activities, Roosevelt does not seek net gains in a reporting period to the
detriment of earnings in future periods. Following is a discussion of the
assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items that were sold and/or
terminated during 1995, 1994 and 1993.
Net gain (loss) from financial instruments is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity...... $ -- $ (231) $ (663)
Investment securities held to maturity........... -- 209 --
Mortgage-backed securities held for trading...... -- (4,545) 2,668
Mark to market of financial futures contracts.... (71,022) 39,508 --
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale.... 23,885 (28,208) 14,659
Investment securities available for sale......... -- (115) 60
Cancellation cost of interest rate exchange
agreements...................................... -- (8,910) (4,496)
Options expense.................................. (11,079) (8,368) (1,582)
-------- -------- -------
$(58,216) $(10,660) $10,646
======== ======== =======
</TABLE>
The principal reasons for the net decrease of approximately $47.6 million
between 1995 and 1994 are discussed below. $71.0 million of the decrease
related to the mark to market of the Company's financial futures positions
which is discussed in more detail in the following paragraphs. In conjunction
with the Company's acquisition of Farm and Home in 1994, certain fixed-rate
mortgage-backed securities available for sale were sold at a net loss of $28.6
million. During 1995, the Company sold certain of its adjustable- and fixed-
rate mortgage-backed securities and recognized a net gain of $23.9 million on
these sales by taking advantage of option adjusted spread differentials
existing in the market place at the dates of the respective sales. The
principal reasons for the net change of approximately $21.3 million between
1994 and 1993 are discussed below. $39.5 million of the increase related to
the mark to market of the Company's financial futures positions which is
discussed in more detail in the following paragraphs. The year 1994 included a
net loss of $28.6 million related to portfolio restructuring in conjunction
with the Company's acquisition of Farm & Home as discussed earlier. During
1993, like 1995, the Company took advantage of the then existing option
adjusted spread differentials to recognize approximately $14.7 million in net
gains from sales from its mortgage-backed securities available for sale
portfolio.
During August 1996, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(Staff) performed a regular review of the Company's 1995 Form 10-K in
conjunction with Registration Statements on Form S-4 filed by the Company
related to three pending acquisitions.
As a result of this review, the Staff questioned the Company's original
accounting treatment surrounding the deferral and recognition of gains and
losses on financial futures contracts used to reduce the interest rate risk of
certain mortgage backed securities in the Company's available for sale
portfolio. The Company originally recognized a $34.8 million charge to fourth
quarter 1995 earnings regarding the cessation of deferral accounting.
87
<PAGE>
At issue was the Staff's contention that the financial futures contracts did
not meet the "high correlation" criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 80 "Accounting for Futures Contracts", thus not qualifying for
deferral accounting from the inception of the hedge in March 1994 and
requiring the recognition of subsequent gains and losses in income. The
Company originally ceased deferral accounting when management concluded that
high correlation measured using the "cumulative dollar approach" was unlikely
to be achieved on a consistent basis.
Accordingly, at the Staff's request, the Company has restated its 1994 and
1995 consolidated financial statements to reflect the cessation of deferral
accounting, from the inception of the hedge, with respect to the
aforementioned financial futures contracts. The restatement had the effect of
increasing previously reported 1994 net income and decreasing previously
reported 1995 net income by $18.0 million (on a fully-diluted per share basis,
an increase of $0.48 for 1994 and a decrease of $0.43 for 1995). This
restatement is one of the timing of recognition of gains and losses in the
Statement of Operations and has no impact on total stockholders' equity at any
date since both the financial futures contracts and the related mortgage-
backed securities have been previously marked to market through stockholders'
equity at each reporting period.
Subsequent to December 31, 1995, the Company terminated all of its financial
futures positions and maintained its interest rate risk management position by
principally redesignating existing interest rate exchange agreements to the
available for sale portfolio. Such interest rate exchange agreements were
utilized prior to the redesignation to manage the interest rate risk of
interest-bearing deposits and other short-term borrowings.
Unrealized Losses on Impairment of Mortgage-backed Securities--The Company
purchased ownership interests in ten pools of privately issued adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities issued in 1989 through 1991 by Guardian Savings and
Loan Association ("Guardian"). All of such Guardian pools in which the Company
purchased and currently holds an ownership interest were rated AA or AAA by
Standard & Poors and Aa2 or Aaa by Moodys, at the date of issuance of the
securities.
Guardian issued their securities with several classes available for
purchase. Certain classes are subordinate to the position of senior classes in
that such subordinate classes absorb all credit losses and must be completely
eliminated before any losses flow to senior position holders. The Guardian
securities purchased by the Company (the "Guardian Securities") were purchases
of the most senior positions, thus intended to be protected by the
subordination credit enhancement feature.
Guardian was placed in conservatorship on June 21, 1991 by the Office of
Thrift Supervision, which appointed the RTC as conservator. Subsequent to the
conservatorship, the RTC replaced Guardian as the servicer for the loans
underlying the securities. Effective November 1994, Bank of America assumed
servicing responsibilities from the RTC. Guardian was a niche player in the
California mortgage market whose lending decisions relied more on the value of
the mortgaged property and the borrower's equity in the property and less on
the borrower's income and credit standing. All collateral underlying the
Guardian Securities have the following loan pool characteristics:
. First lien, 30-year, six-month adjustable-rate loans tied to either the
cost of funds index, one-year constant maturity treasury rate, or LIBOR.
. 100% of the loans were originated in California.
. The weighted average loan-to-value ratio at origination was
approximately 66%.
Beginning in mid-1993 and continuing currently, the loan pools backing the
securities have been affected by high delinquency and foreclosure rates, and
higher than anticipated losses on the ultimate disposition of real estate
acquired through foreclosure (REO). This has resulted in rating agency
downgrades, principally in April and May, 1994 and again in July and
September, 1995 to the current ratings reflected in the tables on page 44 and
substantial deterioration in the amount of the loss absorption capacity
provided by the subordinated classes.
88
<PAGE>
At December 31, 1994 and March 31, 1995, the Guardian securities owned by
the Company were performing according to their contractual terms, and all
realized losses from the disposition of REO were being absorbed by the
subordinate classes (or in the case of Pool 1990-7 at March 31, 1995, by
unamortized purchase discounts). However, to the extent that subsequent to
March 31, 1995, the pools continue to realize losses on the disposition of REO
at levels comparable to the then current rate, the remaining balances of the
subordinate classes may not be adequate to protect the Company from incurring
some credit losses on certain of its ten pools. As a result of this
deterioration and the continuing receipt of subsequent information, the
Company has determined that the underlying investments represented by seven
pools in which, subsequent to March 31, 1995, the subordination protection has
been either totally eliminated or has become potentially inadequate should be
considered "other than temporarily" impaired under the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115. As a result of this determination,
the Company recorded a $22.0 million pre-tax write-down ($14.4 million after
tax or approximately $0.32 per share) for the three months ended March 31,
1995 to reflect the impairment of these seven pools. The amount of the write-
down was based on discounted cash flow analyses performed by management (based
upon assumptions regarding delinquency levels, foreclosure rates and loss
ratios on REO disposition in the underlying portfolio). Discounted cash flow
analyses were utilized to estimate fair value due to the absence of a ready
market for the Guardian Securities.
In addition to the Guardian Securities discussed above, the Company has an
investment of approximately $6.0 million at March 31, 1995 after the write-
down discussed below, in another private issuer mortgage-backed security, LB
Multifamily Mortgage Trust Series 1991-4 (Lehman 91-4), possessing similar
performance characteristics to the Guardian Securities that has also been
determined to be other than temporarily impaired. Accordingly, the Company has
recorded a $5.1 million pre-tax write-down ($3.4 million after tax or
approximately $0.08 per share) to reflect the impairment of this security at
March 31, 1995.
Management believes that these write-downs are adequate based upon its
evaluation.
As reflected in the following table, the Company's remaining investment at
December 31, 1995 in the Guardian Securities is approximately $70.8 million,
after the desecuritization of Guardian Pool 1990-9 discussed below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
Investment in Guardian
Securities, March 31,
1995................... $118.9
Purchase of remaining
senior position of Pool
1990-9................. .6
Net principal payments
received............... (15.1)
Desecuritization of
Guardian Pool 1990-9
(see discussion
below)................. (33.6)
------
Investment in Guardian
Securities, December
31, 1995............... $ 70.8
======
</TABLE>
Subsequent to March 31, 1995, the date of the impairment charge, through
December 31, 1995 the following events have occurred with respect to the
Guardian Securities and Lehman 91-4.
. During the quarter ended June 30, 1995, the Company completed its
planned desecuritization of Guardian Pool 1990-9 and has assumed
servicing of the underlying whole loans and REO properties received
through the desecuritization. As a result of this process, $1.1 million
representing principal, interest and servicing related funds advanced by
previous servicers to certificate holders on properties which were in
REO at the time of the desecuritization was reimbursed to the servicer,
$28.8 million was transferred to mortgage loans and $2.7 million (net of
$4.9 million of charge-offs discussed below) was transferred to
residential REO. REO properties and properties in foreclosure were
written down $4.9 million to their estimated fair values by charges to
existing unallocated REO reserves ($1.4 million) and loan loss reserves
($1.8 million) and to existing unamortized purchase discounts ($1.7
million).
. As expected, there were several additional rating agency downgrades,
principally related to those Guardian pools that are no longer protected
by remaining credit enhancement and which had been
89
<PAGE>
determined to be other than temporarily impaired and written down to
estimated fair value by the Company during the quarter ended March 31,
1995.
. As expected, based on the low levels remaining at March 31, 1995, the
subordination protection related to Guardian Pools 1990-2, 1990-4 and
1990-5 was fully absorbed.
. The remaining four pools (Guardian 89-11, 90-1, 90-8 and Lehman 91-4),
determined at March 31, 1995 to be other than temporarily impaired and
written down to estimated fair value, continue to perform according to
their contractual terms and are protected by remaining subordination
ranging from 3.79% to 11.66% of the remaining unpaid principal balances
of the pools. Such remaining subordination percentages compare to
original subordination percentages ranging from 8.50% to 23.00%.
. The two remaining Guardian pools (89-10 and 91-2), which are not
considered to be other than temporarily impaired, continue to perform
according to their contractual terms and are protected by remaining
subordination of 14.32% and 22.53%, respectively. These remaining
subordination levels compare to 8.50% and 17.00%, respectively, at the
date of issuance of the securities.
. In excess of $15.0 million in net principal payments have been received
since March 31, 1995.
Accordingly, at December 31, 1995, management continued to believe that the
recorded investment in the above mentioned Guardian and Lehman pools was
recoverable.
90
<PAGE>
Presented below is information at December 31, 1995 relating to Roosevelt's
investment in the Guardian pools, segregated between the seven pools
determined to be other than temporarily impaired and the two pools which, in
the opinion of management, continue to be adequately protected from loss
through substantial remaining subordination. The immediately succeeding table
also includes information related to Lehman 91-4 which has been determined to
be other than temporarily impaired.
POOLS DETERMINED TO BE OTHER THAN TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED
DECEMBER 31, 1995
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBORDINATION
AS A PERCENT OF
RATING POOL BALANCE REGARDING ROOSEVELT'S INTERESTS PERCENT OF POOLS
----------------------- ---------------- ----------------------------------- CURRENT OR
ORIGINAL LESS THAN
POOL ISSUE PAR REMAINING REMAINING 90 DAYS
NUMBER DATE AGENCY AT ISSUE CURRENT AT ISSUE CURRENT AT ISSUE PAR INVESTMENT DELINQUENT
------ -------- ------ -------- ------- -------- ------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
GUARDIAN POOLS
89-11.............. 11/30/89 S & P AA CCC 8.50% 11.66% $ 33,750 $ 8,494 $ 6,547 76%
Moody Aa2 B1
90-1............... 1/30/90 S & P AA CC 8.50% 3.79% 3,000 828 622 73%
Moody Aa2 B3
90-2............... 2/27/90 S & P AA D 8.50% -- 27,500 7,175 5,059 73%
Moody Aa2 Caa
90-4............... 4/30/90 S & P AA D 8.75% -- 46,428 14,133 10,459 68%
Moody Aa2 Caa
90-5............... 5/31/90 S & P AA D 8.75% -- 45,000 15,174 11,892 74%
Moody Aa2 Caa
90-7............... 7/25/90 S & P AA D 8.75% -- 68,025 22,035 16,018 71%
Moody Aa2 Caa
90-8............... 9/21/90 S & P AAA CCC 14.00% 9.86% 15,000 5,091 3,924 68%
----------- ---------- ----------
Moody Aaa B3
Total Guardian..... $ 238,703 $ 72,930 $ 54,521
=========== ========== ==========
LEHMAN POOL
91-4............... 7/30/91 S & P AA CCC 23.00% 3.44% $ 14,000 $ 10,404 $ 5,548 76%
=========== ========== ==========
Moody Aa3 Caa
</TABLE>
GUARDIAN POOLS DETERMINED TO BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY REMAINING CREDIT
ENHANCEMENT
DECEMBER 31, 1995
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBORDINATION
AS A PERCENT OF
RATING POOL BALANCE REGARDING ROOSEVELT'S INTERESTS PERCENT OF POOLS
----------------------- ---------------- ----------------------------------- CURRENT OR
ORIGINAL LESS THAN
POOL ISSUE PAR REMAINING REMAINING 90 DAYS
NUMBER DATE AGENCY AT ISSUE CURRENT AT ISSUE CURRENT AT ISSUE PAR INVESTMENT DELINQUENT
------ -------- ------ -------- ------- -------- ------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
89-10.............. 10/27/89 S & P AA BBB 8.50% 14.32% $ 9,000 $ 1,765 $ 1,784 71%
Moody Aa2 Ba3
91-2............... 3/28/91 S & P AA BBB 17.00% 22.53% 39,831 14,527 $ 14,526 71%
---------- ---------- ----------
Moody Aaa Baa3
Totals............. $ 48,831 $ 16,292 $ 16,310
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
91
<PAGE>
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
General and Administrative--General and administrative expense decreased
$23.3 million, or 21.0% to $87.7 million for 1995 as compared to $111.0
million for 1994. The major reasons for the decrease in 1995 are due to 1994
including $19.8 million of merger-related costs and the fact that 1995 general
and administrative expense was also positively impacted by efficiencies
totaling $6.3 million realized as a result of the Farm & Home merger. The
merger expenses related primarily to $5.2 million in severance expense
(included in "Compensation and employee benefits"), $5.3 million in costs to
dispose of excess facilities incident to the acquisition of Farm & Home
(included in "Occupancy") and $9.3 million of transaction costs (included in
"Other").
General and administrative expense increased $19.9 million, or 21.8% to
$111.0 million for 1994 as compared to $91.1 million for 1993. As discussed
previously, 1994 was negatively impacted by $19.8 million of merger related
expenses a result of the acquisition of Farm & Home. The increase in expenses
during 1994 due to the increased volume of savings transactions which were
integrated during late 1993 and in the Home Federal acquisition were offset by
efficiencies achieved as a result of cost savings subsequent to the
acquisition of Farm & Home.
Provision for Real Estate Losses--Provisions for real estate losses totaled
$4.6 million and $4.2 million for 1994 and 1993, respectively. During 1994, in
connection with the acquisition of Farm & Home, a provision of $3.7 million
was established. This provision represented a 25% reduction in net carrying
value of REO to accommodate a change in strategy whereby Roosevelt would
accelerate the disposition of Farm & Home's real estate portfolio.
Additionally, during 1994, a $839,000 provision was recorded related to six
non-residential real estate properties. The 1993 provision for real estate
losses includes $2.8 million recorded for specific losses on 11 non-
residential properties located in Texas and $1.4 million to increase the
general valuation allowance on certain real estate owned.
Litigation Settlements--During 1993, a $3.3 million charge was recorded
related to the execution of a settlement agreement of a lawsuit originally
filed against Farm & Home in 1989. Roosevelt, under the name of Farm & Home,
reached a settlement agreement with its insurance carriers regarding insurance
coverage for various claims and lawsuits arising from participation in the
development of the Southbend Subdivision. See also "Legal Proceedings
Involving Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. and Roosevelt Bank."
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes include Federal income taxes and applicable state income taxes.
Roosevelt's effective tax rates were 27.5%, 33.9% and 33.7% for 1995, 1994 and
1993, respectively. The principal reasons for the Company's effective tax rate
being below the statutory rate for each year are the resolution of Federal tax
issues after completion of examinations by the Internal Revenue Service.
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS
Roosevelt recorded losses on extraordinary items of $7.8 million and $1.9
million, net of income taxes, for 1994 and 1993, respectively. The $7.8
million loss for 1994 was the result of three transactions. First, Roosevelt
recorded a loss totaling $4.6 million relating to the retirement of the
10.125% mortgage-backed bonds. Second, Roosevelt recorded a loss totaling $2.6
million relating to the retirement of the 13.0% subordinated debentures
previously issued by Farm & Home. Third, Roosevelt recorded a loss totaling
$637,000 relating to the prepayment of advances from FHLB of Des Moines
originally entered into by Farm & Home.
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
Farm & Home adopted the provisions of SFAS 115 on January 1, 1994. Such
adoption by Farm & Home resulted in a pretax charge to operations of $9.8
million to reflect the other than temporary impairment of certain interest-
only stripped mortgage-backed pass-through certificates and collateralized
mortgage obligation residual
92
<PAGE>
interests. As Roosevelt had adopted SFAS 115 at December 31, 1993, the $6.5
million net of tax charge by Farm & Home was recorded as a cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle, and reflected in the consolidated
statement of operations of Roosevelt for 1993.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets increased $581.2 million or 6.9% to $9.0 billion at December
31, 1995 from $8.4 billion at December 31, 1994. The major source of such
increase was loans which increased $505.7 million. During 1995, the Company
focused on increasing loans by originating approximately $688.6 million and
purchasing $321.1 million in loans. Acquisitions during 1995 also added
approximately $150.3 million in loans. These increases were offset by
principal repayments totaling $699.3 million. The originations and purchases
during 1995 were primarily adjustable-rate loans. Securities available for
sale decreased $159.2 million due to sales and principal repayments of such
securities exceeding purchases. Securities held to maturity increased $274.1
million during 1995 as the Company was able to grow this portfolio and achieve
desirable yields on such growth. Purchases in this portfolio were also
primarily adjustable-rate securities.
Total liabilities increased $525.9 million or 6.6% to $8.5 billion at
December 31, 1995 from $8.0 billion at December 31, 1994. Deposits increased
$8.1 million during 1995. Deposits acquired through acquisitions during 1995
totaling $182.6 million and interest credited totaling $172.8 million were
almost totally offset by net withdrawals of $346.6 million. The principal
reasons for the net withdrawals were Roosevelt's strategy of conservatively
pricing most deposits to better control Roosevelt's cost of funds and a
general trend in the industry of deposit outflows caused by depositors seeking
improved yields in a relatively low interest rate environment. Securities sold
under agreements to repurchase decreased $125.3 million during 1995 as a
result of the Company being able to obtain lower funding costs from FHLB
advances which increased $669.2 million during 1995. Such increase funded the
asset growth of the Company during 1995.
ASSET QUALITY
Maintaining a low level of nonperforming assets is critical to the success
of a financial institution. As the percentage of assets that are classified as
nonperforming assets changes, so do expectations regarding interest income,
potential provisions for losses and operating expenses incurred to manage and
resolve these assets.
The following table sets forth the amounts and categories of nonperforming
assets. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when the collection of principal
and/or interest becomes doubtful. Troubled debt restructurings involve
forgiving a portion of interest or principal on any loans or making loans at a
rate materially less than that of market rates. Foreclosed assets include
assets acquired in settlement of loans. "Other than temporarily impaired"
mortgage-backed securities represent private issuer mortgage-backed securities
that have been determined to be "other than temporarily impaired" under the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 and for
which the previously existing credit enhancement support, in the form of
subordination, has been totally absorbed and therefore any future losses will
flow directly to the Company as a senior position holder. These securities
were issued with several classes available for purchase. Certain classes are
subordinate to the position of senior classes in that such subordinate classes
absorb all credit losses and must be completely eliminated before any losses
flow to senior position holders. The securities purchased by the Company were
purchases of the most senior positions, thus intended to be protected by the
subordination credit enhancement feature. In an attempt toward a conservative
presentation, the Company includes the entire estimated fair value of these
securities (approximately 74% of the unpaid principal balances at December 31,
1995) in this table when the credit enhancement, in the form of subordination,
is exhausted even though a substantial portion of the underlying loans
(approximately 71% at December 31, 1995) are either current or less than 90
days delinquent. In addition, the remaining amount of "other than temporarily
impaired" mortgage-backed securities that continue to be protected by
remaining credit enhancement, but for which the Company has concluded it is
probable that such credit enhancement will be absorbed before the duration of
the underlying security, are disclosed in the paragraphs following the table
as other potential problem assets. See "--Unrealized Losses on Impairment of
Mortgage-Backed Securities Held to Maturity."
93
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Nonperforming Assets
Nonaccruing loans:
Residential..................... $ 7,895 $ 5,666 $ 9,524 $12,249 $13,006
Commercial real estate.......... 1,415 1,626 985 7,988 2,471
Consumer........................ 193 269 217 217 278
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total......................... 9,503 7,561 10,726 20,454 15,755
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Accruing loans delinquent more
than 90 days:
Residential..................... 10,500 4,598 4,056 2,110 2,115
Commercial real estate.......... -- 482 -- -- --
Consumer........................ -- -- -- 4 14
Land............................ -- -- 360 394 141
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total......................... 10,500 5,080 4,416 2,508 2,270
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Troubled-debt restructurings:
Commercial real estate.......... 661 2,757 2,127 1,363 1,288
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Foreclosed/Repossessed assets:
Residential..................... 5,340 2,703 1,373 2,049 4,690
Commercial real estate.......... 11,483 16,085 15,998 20,500 26,320
Consumer........................ 11 -- -- 16 43
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total......................... 16,834 18,788 17,371 22,565 31,053
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total nonperforming loans and
REO.......................... 37,498 34,186 34,640 46,890 50,366
Total nonperforming loans and
REO as a percentage of total
assets....................... .42% .41% .46% .78% .89%
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Other than temporarily impaired
mortgage-backed securities with
approximately 71% of the
underlying loans either current
or less than 90 days delinquent.. 43,429 -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total "nonperforming assets"...... $80,927 $34,186 $34,640 $46,890 $50,366
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Total "nonperforming assets" as a
percentage of total assets....... .90% .41% .46% .78% .89%
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Nonperforming assets have increased $46.7 million to $80.9 million at
December 31, 1995 as compared to $34.2 millon at December 31, 1994. The
overall increase in non-performing assets is due primarily to the inclusion in
the table of $43.4 million of "other than temporarily impaired" private issuer
mortgage-backed securities where the Company's credit enhancement has been
fully absorbed. Non-accruing residential loans increased $1.4 million,
accruing residential loans delinquent more than 90 days increased $3.3 million
and foreclosed residential real estate assets increased $589,000 as a result
of the desecuritization (and related transfer of servicing of the underlying
collateral) of a private issuer mortgage-backed security pool completed in the
quarter ended June 30, 1995. See the caption entitled "Unrealized Losses on
Impairment of Mortgage-Backed Securities Held to Maturity" under the heading
"Results of Operations" for further details. In addition to the impact of the
desecuritization of the private issuer mortgage-backed security pool, non-
accruing residential loans, accruing residential loans delinquent more than 90
days and residential foreclosed assets increased $801,000, $2.6 million and
$2.0 million, respectively during 1995. Such increases are due primarily to a
larger loan portfolio and are not considered trends in the loan portfolio.
Commercial real estate troubled debt restructurings decreased $2.1 million as
a result of the repayment of the outstanding principal on a loan secured by a
nursing home. Commercial real estate foreclosed assets decreased $4.6 million
primarily as a result of sales of the properties during 1995.
94
<PAGE>
Not included in the preceding table are certain pools of private issuer
mortgage-backed securities with a carrying value of $16.6 million which were
performing according to their contractual terms at December 31, 1995. However,
these securities were determined by the Company to be "other than temporarily
impaired" and written down to fair value, since at March 31, 1995, the
subordination protection had been reduced to the point where the Company
concluded it was not probable that the securities would continue to perform to
100% of their contractual terms over the course of their remaining lives.
These securities will be included in the preceding non-performing asset table
in future periods when, and if, the remaining subordination is exhausted. The
following table is a reconciliation of the amount of currently performing,
other than temporarily impaired mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 1995
to such amount at December 31, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
Amount of currently performing, other than temporarily impaired
mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 1995................... $ 52.4
Principal payments received..................................... (6.4)
Addition of Guardian Pools 1990-2, 1990-4 and 1990-5 to the
nonperforming asset table as subordination protection was
absorbed between March 31, 1995 and December 31, 1995.......... (29.4)
------
Amount of currently performing, other than temporarily impaired
mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 1995................ $ 16.6
======
</TABLE>
To monitor the credit risk inherent in its private issuer mortgage-backed
security portfolio, the Company tracks the major factors effecting the
performance of its portfolio including i) a review of delinquencies,
foreclosures, repossessions, and recovery rates relative to the underlying
mortgage loans collateralizing each security, ii) the level of available
subordination or other credit enhancement and iii) the rating assigned to each
security by independent national rating agencies.
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
The Company's primary objective regarding asset/liability management is to
position the Company such that changes in interest rates do not have a
material adverse impact upon net interest income or the net market value of
the Company. See Note 3 to "Financial Statements of Roosevelt Financial Group,
Inc.--Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report for
the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995." for additional information
regarding the calculation of net market value. The Company's primary strategy
for accomplishing its asset/liability management objective is achieved by
matching the weighted average maturities of assets, liabilities, and off-
balance sheet items (duration matching). Integral to the duration matching
strategy is the use of derivative financial instruments such as interest rate
exchange agreements, interest rate cap and floor agreements and, to a much
more limited extent, financial futures contracts. The Company uses derivative
financial instruments solely for risk management purposes. None of the
Company's derivative instruments are what are termed leveraged instruments.
These types of instruments are riskier than the derivatives used by the
Company in that they have embedded options that enhance their performance in
certain circumstances but dramatically reduce their performance in other
circumstances. The Company is not a dealer nor does it make a market in such
instruments. The Company does not trade the instruments and the Board of
Directors' approved policy governing the Company's use of these instruments
strictly forbids speculation of any kind.
Net market value is calculated by adjusting stockholders' equity for
differences between the estimated fair values and the carrying values
(historical cost basis) of the Company's assets, liabilities, and off-balance
sheet items. Net market value, as calculated by the Company and presented
herein, should not be confused with the value of the Company's stock or of the
amounts distributable to stockholders in connection with a sale of the Company
or in the unlikely event of its liquidation. The economic net market value
(including the estimated value of demand deposits) as calculated by the
Company increased to approximately $481.5 million at December 31, 1995 as
compared to approximately $404.0 million at December 31, 1994. To measure the
impact of interest rate changes, the Company recalculates its net market value
on a pro forma basis assuming
95
<PAGE>
instantaneous, permanent parallel shifts in the yield curve, in varying
amounts both upward and downward. Larger increases or decreases in the
Company's net market value as a result of these assumed interest rate changes
indicate greater levels of interest rate sensitivity than do smaller increases
or decreases in net market value. The Company endeavors to maintain a position
whereby it experiences no material change in net market value as a result of
assumed 100 and 200 basis point increases and decreases in general levels of
interest rates.
The OTS issued a regulation, effective January 1, 1994, which uses a similar
methodology to measure the interest rate risk exposure of thrift institutions.
This exposure is a measure of the potential decline in the net portfolio value
of the institution based upon the effect of an assumed 200 basis point
increase or decrease in interest rates. "Net portfolio value" is the present
value of the expected net cash flow from the institution's assets,
liabilities, and off- balance sheet contracts. Under the OTS regulation, an
institution's "normal" level of interest rate risk in the event of this
assumed change in interest rates is a decrease in the institution's net
portfolio value in an amount not exceeding two percent of the present value of
its assets. The regulation provides for a two quarter lag between calculating
interest rate risk and recognizing any deduction from capital. The amount of
that deduction is one-half of the difference between (a) the institution's
actual calculated exposure to the 200 basis point interest rate increase or
decrease (whichever results in the greater pro forma decrease in net portfolio
value) and (b) its "normal" level of exposure which is two percent of the
present value of its assets. The OTS recently announced that it will delay the
effectiveness of the regulation until it adopts the process by which an
association may appeal an interest rate risk capital deduction determination.
Utilizing this measurement concept, the interest rate risk of the Company at
December 31, 1995 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Basis point changes in interest
rates................................ -200 -100 +100 +200
Change in net market value due to
changes in interest rates (Company
methodology)......................... $ (12,070) $(6,306) $(10,714) $ (40,127)
Interest rate exposure deemed "normal"
by the OTS........................... $(180,261) N/A N/A $(180,261)
</TABLE>
The Company's operating strategy is designed to avoid material negative
changes in net market value. As of December 31, 1995, the Company believes it
has accomplished its objectives as the pro forma changes in net market value
brought about by changes in interest rates are not material relative to the
Company's net market value. A net unrealized market value loss when rates
increase indicates the duration of the Company's assets is slightly longer
than the duration of the Company's liabilities. A loss when rates decrease is
due primarily to borrowers prepaying their loans resulting in the Company's
assets repricing down more quickly than the Company can reprice its
liabilities.
MATURITY GAP ANALYSIS
Thrift institutions have historically presented a Gap Table as a measure of
interest rate risk. The Gap Table presents the projected maturities and
periods to repricing of a thrift's rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The
OTS has concluded such an analysis has limitations, however, for reasons of
consistency the following discussion presents the Company's traditional
Maturity Gap Analysis.
The Company's one year cumulative gap, which represents the difference
between the amount of interest sensitive assets maturing or repricing in one
year and the amount of interest sensitive liabilities maturing or repricing in
the same period was (0.50)% at December 31, 1995. A negative cumulative gap
indicates that interest sensitive liabilities exceed interest sensitive assets
at a specific date. In a rising interest rate environment institutions with
negative maturity gaps generally will experience a more rapid increase in
interest expense paid on liabilities than the interest income earned on
assets. Conversely, in an environment of falling interest rates, interest
expense paid on liabilities will generally decrease more rapidly than the
interest income earned on assets. A positive gap will have the opposite
effect.
96
<PAGE>
The following table presents the projected maturities and periods to
repricing of the Company's rate sensitive assets and liabilities as of December
31, 1995, adjusted to account for anticipated prepayments.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OVER 3 OVER 1 OVER 3
MONTHS YEAR YEARS
UP TO 3 THROUGH THROUGH THROUGH OVER
MONTHS 1 YEAR 3 YEARS 5 YEARS 5 YEARS TOTAL
---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed
securities:
Balloon and adjustable
rate first mortgage
loans................. $2,572,916 $2,477,196 $ 603,266 $186,788 $ 27,509 $5,867,675
One to four family
residential first
mortgages and
contracts............. 303,270 254,786 700,181 398,074 579,684 2,235,995
Five or more family
residential and
nonresidential first
mortgages and
contracts............. 68,069 20,558 34,770 13,697 9,961 147,055
Second mortgages....... 165 128 265 68 18 644
Non-mortgage loans:
Consumer............... 80,726 10,595 22,513 6,386 2,358 122,578
Commercial............. 2,092 657 260 46 -- 3,055
Investments and
interest bearing
deposits.............. 266,705 5,696 4,836 2,009 12,935 292,181
Premiums (discounts) and
deferred loan fees,
net.................... 16,100 7,872 9,314 4,277 20,585 58,148
---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
Total rate sensitive
assets................. 3,310,043 2,777,488 1,375,405 611,345 653,050 8,727,331
---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
LIABILITIES:
Fixed maturity
deposits.............. 620,344 1,584,419 989,452 398,472 87,228 3,679,915
NOW, Super NOW, and
other transaction
accounts.............. 35,344 31,810 57,257 45,806 183,223 353,440
Money market deposit
accounts.............. 544,872 -- -- -- -- 544,872
Passbook accounts...... 32,927 29,634 53,342 42,673 170,694 329,270
FHLB advances.......... 1,899,950 361,932 113,256 -- 2,000 2,377,138
Other borrowings....... 986,064 96,750 -- -- 47,523 1,130,337
---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
Total rate sensitive
liabilities............ 4,119,501 2,104,545 1,213,307 486,951 490,668 8,414,972
Effect of interest rate
exchange agreements on
rate sensitive
liabilities............ (101,000) 10,000 (40,000) 210,000 (79,000) --
---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
Total rate sensitive
liabilities adjusted
for impact of interest
rate exchange
agreements............ 4,018,501 2,114,545 1,173,307 696,951 411,668 8,414,472
---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
Maturity gap............ $ (708,458) $ (662,943) $ 202,098 $(85,606) $241,382 $ 312,359
========== ========== ========== ======== ======== ==========
Gap as a percent of
total assets........... (7.86)% 7.36% 2.24% (.95)% 2.68%
========== ========== ========== ======== ========
Cumulative maturity
gap.................... $ (708,458) $ (45,515) $ 156,583 $ 70,977 $312,359
========== ========== ========== ======== ========
Cumulative gap as a
percent of total
assets................. (7.86)% (.50)% 1.74% .79% 3.47%
========== ========== ========== ======== ========
</TABLE>
97
<PAGE>
In preparing the table above, it has been assumed that (i) balloon and
adjustable-rate first mortgage loans will prepay at a rate of 18% per year,
(ii) fixed-rate first mortgage loans on residential properties of five or more
units and nonresidential properties will prepay at a rate of 10% per year,
(iii) fixed maturity deposits will not be withdrawn prior to maturity, (iv)
passbook and NOW accounts will be withdrawn at a rate of approximately 10% in
each of the first two periods and at other assumed rates ranging from 20% to
100% thereafter, (v) fixed-rate mortgage loans on one- to four-family
residences with terms to maturity of 10 years or less will prepay at a rate of
20% per year, (vi) second mortgage loans on one- to four-family residences
will prepay at a rate of 30% per year, and (vii) fixed-rate first mortgage
loans on one- to four-family residential properties with remaining terms to
maturity of over 10 years will prepay annually as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PREPAYMENT ASSUMPTIONS
--------------------------
MORTGAGE LOAN OVER 10 TO 20 YEARS
INTEREST RATE 20 YEARS AND OVER
------------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Less than 8%..................................... 20.00 20.00
8 to 10%......................................... 24.00 24.00
10 to 12%........................................ 23.00 23.00
12 to 14%........................................ 23.00 23.00
14 to 16%........................................ 23.00 23.00
16% and over..................................... 23.00 23.00
</TABLE>
The above assumptions do not necessarily indicate the impact of general
interest rate movements. Accordingly, certain assets and liabilities indicated
as repricing within a stated period may in fact reprice at different times and
at different rate levels.
The amounts in the table could be significantly effected by external
factors, such as prepayment rates other than those assumed, early withdrawals
of deposits, changes in the correlation of various interest-bearing
instruments, and competition. Additionally, decisions by the Company to sell
assets, retire debt, or cancel interest rate exchange arrangements early would
also change the maturity/repricing and spread relationships.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OTS regulations require federally insured savings institutions to maintain a
specified ratio (presently 5.0%) of cash and short-term United States
Government, government agency, and other specified securities to net
withdrawable accounts and borrowings due within one year. The Company has
maintained liquidity in excess of required amounts having had ratios of 5.64%,
5.91%, and 6.04% at December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively.
The Company's cash flows are comprised of cash flows from operating,
investing and financing activities. Cash flows provided by operating
activities, consisting primarily of interest received on investments
(principally loans and mortgage-backed securities) less interest paid on
deposits and other short-term borrowings, were $41.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 1995. Net cash related to investing activities, consisting
primarily of purchases of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity and
available for sale and originations and purchases of loans, offset by
principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities and loans and sales of
mortgage-backed securities available for sale, utilized $381.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 1995. Net cash related to financing activities,
consisting of proceeds, net of repayments, from FHLB advances, proceeds from
securities sold under agreements to repurchase and excess of savings deposits
withdrawals over receipts, provided $333.7 million for the year ended December
31, 1995.
At December 31, 1995, the Company had commitments outstanding to originate
fixed-rate mortgage loans of approximately $54.0 million and adjustable-rate
mortgages of approximately $45.5 million. At December 31, 1995, the Company
had outstanding commitments to purchase adjustable-rate mortgage loans of
approximately $123.3 million. At December 31, 1995, the Company had
outstanding commitments to purchase and sell mortgage-backed securities of
approximately $329.1 million and $178.9 million, respectively. The Company
expects to satisfy such commitments through its primary source of funds.
98
<PAGE>
OTS regulations impose various restrictions or requirements on associations
with respect to their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions of
capital. The OTS utilizes a three-tiered approach to permit associations,
based on their capital level and supervisory condition, to make capital
distributions which include dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-
out mergers, interest payments on certain convertible debt, and other
transactions charged to the capital account. Tier 1 associations, which are
associations that before and after the proposed distribution meet or exceed
their fully phased-in capital requirements, may make capital distributions
during any calendar year up to the greater of 100% of net income for the year-
to-date plus 50% of the amount by which the lesser of the association's
tangible, core, or total capital exceeds its fully phased-in capital
requirement, as measured at the beginning of the calendar year. As of December
31, 1995, the Bank's excess capital over its fully phased-in core capital
requirement was approximately $206.1 million. The Company is also subject to
Delaware law which limits dividends to an amount equal to the excess of a
corporation's net assets over paid-in capital or, if there is no excess, to
its net profits for the current and immediately preceding fiscal year. See
"Business of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.--Regulation--Limitations on
Dividends and Other Capital Distributions."
Certain liquidity risks are inherent in asset/liability management. Such
risks include, among others, changes in interest rates, which can cause margin
calls or collateral calls on reverse repurchase agreements and mortgage-backed
bonds, respectively, as a result of changes in the value of collateral, and
timing delays when the receipt of interest, principal or repayments on loans
and mortgage-backed securities does not correspond with the timing of the
funding of the related liability. The Company has implemented policies through
which it endeavors to manage these liquidity risks. Liquidity is maintained at
levels which exceed the amounts required for regulatory purposes. In addition,
a majority of the mortgage-backed bonds issued by the Company utilize a
defeasance structure. This feature reduces and stabilizes the amount of
collateral that the Company is required to maintain as security for the bonds.
IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and
liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result,
interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution's
performance than do the general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not
necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the price
of goods and services. In the current interest rate environment, liquidity and
the maturity structure of the Company's assets and liabilities are critical to
the maintenance of acceptable performance levels.
The consolidated financial statements and related financial data presented
herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating
results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the
relative purchasing power over time due to inflation.
ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
During October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-
Based Compensation" (SFAS 123). SFAS 123 establishes financial accounting and
reporting standards for stock-based employee compensation plans and also
applies to transactions in which an entity issues its equity instruments to
acquire goods or services from nonemployees. SFAS 123 defines a fair value-
based method of accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity
instruments and encourages all entities to adopt that method of accounting.
However, it also allows an entity to continue to measure compensation cost for
those plans using the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" (APB 25). SFAS 123 is effective for transactions entered into in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995. Pro forma disclosures required
for entities that elect to continue to measure compensation cost using APB 25
must include the effect of all awards granted in fiscal years that begin after
December 15, 1994. Roosevelt plans to continue to measure compensation cost
using APB 25, therefore the adoption of SFAS No. 123 will not have any impact
on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
99
<PAGE>
During May 1995, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 122, "Accounting for Mortgage Servicing Rights" (SFAS 122). SFAS 122
requires that an institution which sells or securitizes loans it has
originated or purchased and maintains the servicing rights to capitalize the
cost of the rights to service such loans. As the Company is not currently
selling or securitizing any loans that is has originated or purchased, the
aforementioned provision of SFAS 122 will not have any impact on the Company's
financial statements. SFAS 122 also requires that an enterprise assess its
capitalized mortgage servicing rights for impairment based on the fair value
of those rights. SFAS No. 122 should be applied prospectively for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1995. The Company adopted SFAS No. 122 on January
1, 1996. The Company does not anticipate that this provision will have a
significant impact on its financial statements.
During March 1995, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" (SFAS 121). SFAS 121 provides guidance
for the recognition and measurement of impairment of long-lived assets,
certain identifiable intangibles, and goodwill related both to assets to be
held and used and assets to be disposed of. SFAS 121 requires entities to
perform separate calculations for assets to be held and used to determine
whether recognition of an impairment loss is required and, if so, to measure
the impairment. SFAS 121 requires long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles to be disposed of to be reported at the lower of carrying amount
or fair value less costs to sell, except for assets covered by the provisions
of APB Opinion No. 30. SFAS 121 is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995. The Company does not
anticipate that the adoption of SFAS 121 will have a significant impact on its
financial statements.
100
<PAGE>
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
QUARTERS ENDED IN 1996
-----------------------
MARCH 31 JUNE 30
----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C>
Total interest income................................. $ 166,143 $ 162,280
Total interest expense................................ 119,769 118,984
----------- -----------
Net interest income.................................. 46,374 43,296
Provision for losses on loans........................ 300 300
Noninterest income (loss) excluding net gain from
financial instruments................................ 8,177 9,755
Net gain from financial instruments................... 341 521
Noninterest expense................................... 21,718 23,428
----------- -----------
Income before income tax expense and extraordinary
item................................................. 32,874 29,844
Income tax expense (benefit).......................... 11,309 10,116
----------- -----------
Net income............................................ $ 21,565 $ 19,728
=========== ===========
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock........ $ 20,508 $ 18,671
=========== ===========
Primary earnings (loss) per share..................... $ 0.48 $ 0.44
=========== ===========
Fully-diluted earnings (loss) per share............... $ 0.46 $ 0.42
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
101
<PAGE>
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
QUARTERS ENDED IN 1995
--------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPT. 30 DEC. 31
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total interest income..... $ 156,436 $ 162,576 $ 163,920 $ 164,863
Total interest expense.... 108,123 116,893 120,700 120,717
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income..... 48,313 45,683 43,220 44,146
Provision for losses on
loans.................... (300) (300) (300) (300)
Noninterest income (loss)
excluding net gain (loss)
from financial
instruments.............. (19,480) 7,443 8,872 6,241
Net gain (loss) from
financial instruments.... (32,804) (22,935) 1,620 (4,097)
Noninterest expense....... (21,493) (21,740) (20,875) (23,558)
Income (loss) before
income tax expense and
extraordinary item....... (25,764) 8,151 32,537 22,432
Income tax expense
(benefit)................ (9,589) 2,291 11,040 6,516
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss)......... $ (16,175) $ 5,860 $ 21,497 $ 15,916
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss)
attributable to common
stock.................... $ (17,247) $ 4,803 $ 20,440 $ 14,859
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Primary earnings (loss)
per share................ $ (0.43) $ 0.12 $ 0.50 $ 0.37
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Fully-diluted earnings
(loss) per share......... $ (0.43) $ 0.12 $ 0.47 $ 0.35
=========== =========== =========== ===========
<CAPTION>
QUARTERS ENDED IN 1994
--------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPT. 30 DEC. 31
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total interest income..... $ 120,246 $ 129,990 $ 138,263 $ 144,787
Total interest expense.... 76,705 82,879 90,712 97,278
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income..... 43,541 47,111 47,551 47,509
Provision for losses on
loans.................... (150) (11,682) (300) (300)
Noninterest income
excluding net gain (loss)
from financial
instruments.............. 5,559 7,612 7,249 7,496
Net gain (loss) from
financial instruments.... 1,627 (33,485) 2,553 18,645
Noninterest expense....... (23,634) (45,711) (20,731) (20,919)
Provision for real estate
losses................... (839) (3,742) -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income (loss) before
income tax expense and
extraordinary item....... 26,104 (39,897) 36,322 52,431
Income tax expense
(benefit)................ 9,039 (13,165) 12,393 17,117
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income (loss) before
extraordinary item....... 17,065 (26,732) 23,929 35,314
Extraordinary item........ -- (7,849) -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss)......... $ 17,065 $ (34,581) $ 23,929 $ 35,314
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss)
attributable to common
stock.................... $ 15,866 $ (35,484) $ 22,987 $ 34,243
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Primary earnings per
share:
Income (loss) before
extraordinary item..... $ 0.49 $ (0.71) $ 0.57 $ 0.84
Extraordinary item...... -- (0.20) -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss)..... $ 0.49 $ (0.91) $ 0.57 $ 0.84
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Fully-diluted earnings per
share:
Income (loss) before
extraordinary item..... $ 0.42 $ (0.71) $ 0.53 $ 0.77
Extraordinary item...... -- (0.20) -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss)..... $ 0.42 $ (0.91) $ 0.53 $ 0.77
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
102
<PAGE>
See above discussion of impairment charge on certain mortgage-backed
securities during the quarter ended March 31, 1995 in "Results of Operations."
See above discussion of the merger-related expenses recorded during the
quarter ended June 30, 1994 in connection with the Farm & Home acquisition in
"Results of Operations."
Selected Quarterly Financial Data for all quarters of 1994 and 1995 have
been restated to reflect the cessation of deferral accounting, from the
inception of the hedge in March 1994, with respect to then existing financial
futures contracts utilized to reduce the interest rate risk of certain
mortgage-backed securities in the Company's available for sale portfolio. See
Note 15 of "Financial Statements of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.--
Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report for the
Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995"and "--Results of Operations" for
further discussion.
103
<PAGE>
COMPARISON OF THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND 1995
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Income
The Company recorded net income totaling $19.7 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 1996 as compared to $5.9 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 1995. Net income on a fully diluted per share basis was
$0.42 for the three month period ended June 30, 1996 as compared to $0.12 for
the same period in 1995. Net income for the three month period ended June 30,
1995 was impacted by the recognition of losses resulting from the mark to
market of the Company's financial futures positions used to reduce the
interest rate risk of certain mortgage-backed securities in the available for
sale portfolio totaling $27.8 million.
The Company recorded net income totaling $41.3 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 1996 as compared to a net loss totaling $10.3 million
for the six month period ended June 30, 1995. Net income on a fully diluted
per share basis was $0.88 for the six month period ended June 30, 1996 as
compared to a loss on a fully diluted per share basis of $0.31. Net income for
the six month period ended June 30, 1995 was impacted by the recognition of
losses resulting from the mark to market of the Company's financial futures
positions used to reduce the interest rate risk of certain mortgage-backed
securities in the available for sale portfolio to totaling $61.7 million. Net
income for June 30, 1995 was also negatively impacted by $27.1 million of
unrealized losses on impairment of certain mortgage-backed securities. For a
discussion of the issues relating to financial futures positions see Note 1 of
"Financial Statements of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.--Consolidated
Financial Statements for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 1996. For a
discussion of the issues relating to the unrealized losses see "--Unrealized
Losses on Impairment of Mortgage-Backed Securities Held to Maturity".
Interest Income
Interest income decreased $296,000 to $162.3 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 1996 as compared to $162.6 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 1995. Interest income on loans increased $11.5 million
primarily as a result of an increase in the average balance of loans from $3.2
billion for the three months ended June 30, 1995 to $3.9 billion for the three
months ended June 30, 1996 which was partially offset by a decline in the
average yield on such loans from 7.68% for the three months ended June 30,
1995 to 7.54% for the three months ended June 30, 1996. The increase in the
average balance of loans is primarily attributable to the Company's continuing
efforts to originate a greater portion of its assets in the form of mortgage
and consumer loans, as well as strong demand for such loans in the Company's
retail markets. The slight decrease in the average yield of the Company's loan
portfolio resulted from continuing prepayments of higher yielding loans with
such loans being replaced with loans carrying low introductory rates, which
until they adjust provide a relatively low spread to the marginal cost of
funds. Interest income on securities available for sale decreased $9.3 million
primarily as a result of a decrease in the average balance of such securities
outstanding by approximately $477.0 million when comparing the 1996 period to
the 1995 period. The decrease of the Company's available for sale portfolio to
partially fund the above mentioned loan growth is consistent with the
Company's retail strategy. Interest income from securities held to maturity
decreased $2.5 million when comparing the three month period ended June 30,
1996 period to the same 1995 period primarily due to declining yields received
on such securities to 6.91% for the 1996 period from 7.12% for the 1995
period. The decrease in yields received on the Company's held to maturity
portfolio was primarily attributable to heavy prepayments which not only
claimed some of the portfolios higher yielding assets but also resulted in
accelerated premium amortization.
Interest income increased $9.4 million to $328.4 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 1996 as compared to $319.0 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 1995. Interest income on loans increased $24.5 million
primarily as a result of an increase in the average balances of loans from
$3.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 1995 to $3.8 billion for the
six months ended June 30, 1996 and to a lesser extent because of a slight
increase in the average yields received on such loans from 7.58% to 7.63%. The
increase in the
104
<PAGE>
average balances of loans is primarily attributable to the Company's
continuing efforts to originate a greater portion of its assets in the form of
mortgage and consumer loans, as well as strong demand for such loans in the
Company's retail markets. Interest income on securities available for sale
decreased $17.2 million primarily as a result of a decrease in the average
balance of such securities outstanding by approximately $477.7 million when
comparing the six month period ended June 30, 1996 to the same period in 1995.
The decrease of the Company's available for sale portfolio to partially fund
the above mentioned loan growth is consistent with the Company's retail
strategy. Interest income from securities held to maturity increased $1.9
million when comparing the six month period ended June 30, 1996 to the same
period in 1995. Such increase was due primarily to an increase in the yields
received on such securities from 6.96% to 7.04%.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $2.1 million to $119.0 million for the three
month period ended June 30, 1996 as compared to $116.9 million for the same
period in 1995. Interest expense on deposits increased $2.7 million when
comparing the three month period ended June 30, 1996 to the same 1995 period.
Such increase was a result of an increase in the average balance of deposits
from $4.8 billion for the three months ended June 30, 1995 to $4.9 billion for
the three months ended June 30, 1996 and an increase in the average rates paid
on those deposits for the same time periods from 5.03% to 5.39%. The increase
in the average balance of deposits is consistent with and results from the
Company's retail strategy, while the increase in the average rates paid on
such deposits is necessitated by intense competition in the Company's market
areas. Despite this intense competition, retail deposits remain an
attractively priced source of funds compared to non-retail alternatives.
Interest expense on other borrowings, which is mainly comprised of securities
sold under agreements to repurchase and advances from the Federal Home Loan
Bank, decreased overall $3.8 million when comparing the three month period
ended June 30, 1996 to the same period in 1995. Such decrease resulted from a
decrease in the average rates paid on these borrowings from 6.04% to 5.48% and
was partially offset by a slight increase in the average balances of these
borrowings of $98.1 million during the period. The decrease in the average
rates paid on the Company's other short-term borrowings is primarily
attributable to the Federal Reserve Board's reduction of short-term interest
rates in December 1995 and January 1996. Interest expense on interest rate
exchange agreements increased $3.2 million for the 1996 period when compared
to the 1995 period. Approximately $1.7 million of such increase was the result
of decreased amortization in the current period of deferred gains on
terminated interest rate exchange agreements. Such deferred gains which were
being amortized in the three month period ended June 30, 1995, thus reducing
interest expense, were fully amortized prior to the current three month
period, thereby causing interest expense on a comparative quarter over quarter
basis to increase. The remaining $1.5 million increase in interest rate
exchange agreement expense for 1996 when compared to 1995 is due primarily to
a decrease of approximately 40 basis points in the variable rates received on
such agreements resulting principally from the Federal Reserve Board's
decision to reduce short-term interest rates in December 1995 and January
1996.
Interest expense increased $13.7 million to $238.8 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 1996 as compared to $225.0 million for the same period
in 1995. Interest expense on deposits increased $9.5 million when comparing
the six month period ended June 30, 1996 to the same 1995 period. Such
increase was primarily the result of an increase in the average rates paid on
deposits from 4.78% for the six moths ended June 30, 1995 to 5.42% for the six
months ended June 30, 1996 and to a lesser extent an increase in the average
balances of such deposits for the same time periods from $4.8 billion to $4.9
billion. The explanations of the increases in both average rates paid and
average balances for the six month periods are the same as those described
above for the three month periods. Interest expense on other borrowings, which
is mainly comprised of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, decreased overall $3.7 million when
comparing the six month period ended June 30, 1996 to the same period in 1995.
Such decrease resulted from a decrease in the average rates paid on such
borrowings from 5.96% to 5.52%, partially offset by a slight increase in the
average balances of these borrowings of $149.1 million during the period. The
decrease in the average rates paid on the Company's other short-term
borrowings is primarily attributable to the Federal Reserve Board's reduction
of short-term interest rates in December 1995 and January 1996. Interest
expense on interest
105
<PAGE>
rate exchange agreements increased $8.0 million for the 1996 period when
compared to the 1995 period. Approximately $4.0 million of such increase was a
result of decreased amortization of deferred gains in the current period on
terminated interest rate exchange agreements. Such deferred gains which were
being amortized in the six month period ended June 30, 1995, thus reducing
interest expense, were fully amortized prior to the current six month period,
thereby causing interest expense on a comparative six month period to
increase. The remaining $4.0 million increase in interest rate exchange
agreement expense for 1996 when compared to 1995 is due primarily to a
decrease of approximately 60 basis points in the variable rates received on
such agreements resulting principally from the Federal Reserve Board's
reduction in short-term interest rates in December 1995 and January 1996.
Average Balances, Interest Rates and Yields
The following table presents at the date and for the periods indicated the
Company's average interest-earning assets, average interest-bearing
liabilities, interest income and expense and average rates earned and paid.
Average rates earned and paid are derived by dividing income or expense by the
average balance of assets and liabilities, respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
------------------------- -------------------------
INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE
AVERAGE INCOME/ RATE AVERAGE INCOME/ RATE
BALANCE EXPENSE % BALANCE EXPENSE %
-------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash equivalents......... $ 27.0 $ 0.3 5.01% $ 17.6 $ 0.3 5.79%
Securities available for
sale(1)................. 1,424.0 25.6 7.19 1,901.0 34.9 7.34
Securities held to
maturity................ 3,647.1 63.1 6.91 3,685.1 65.6 7.12
Loans(2)(3).............. 3,886.4 73.3 7.54 3,219.1 61.8 7.68
-------- ------ -------- ------
Total interest-earning
assets................ 8,984.5 $162.3 7.22% 8,822.8 $162.6 7.37%
------ ------ -----
Other assets............. 427.2 313.1
-------- --------
$9,411.7 $9,135.9
======== ========
Liabilities:
Deposits:
NOW and money market
accounts(4)............. $ 984.1 $ 8.4 3.40% $ 828.3 $ 5.9 2.86%
Passbook savings
deposits................ 309.4 1.8 2.30 355.5 2.0 2.29
Time deposits(4)......... 3,640.2 56.3 6.19 3,636.4 52.7 5.79
-------- ------ -------- ------
4,933.7 66.5 5.39 4,820.2 60.6 5.03
Borrowings:
Securities sold under
agreement to
repurchase.............. 1,055.3 14.2 5.39 1,523.4 23.0 6.03
Advances from FHLB......... 2,691.9 37.1 5.51 2,125.7 32.1 6.05
Other borrowings........... 47.6 1.2 10.25 47.5 1.2 10.28
-------- ------ -------- ------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities........... 8,728.5 $119.0 5.45% 8,516.8 $116.9 5.49%
------ ----- ------ -----
Other liabilities.......... 170.5 174.1
-------- --------
8,899.0 8,690.9
Stockholders' equity: 512.7 445.0
-------- --------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity.. $9,411.7 $9,135.9
======== ========
Net interest income........ $ 43.3 $ 45.7
====== ======
Interest rate spread....... 1.77% 1.88%
===== =====
Effective net spread....... 1.93% 2.07%
===== =====
</TABLE>
106
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
------------------------- -------------------------
INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE
AVERAGE INCOME/ RATE AVERAGE INCOME/ RATE
BALANCE EXPENSE % BALANCE EXPENSE %
-------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash equivalents......... $ 25.5 $ 0.6 5.07% $ 18.1 $ 0.5 5.66%
Securities available for
sale(1)................. 1,493.6 55.0 7.36 1,971.3 72.1 7.31
Securities held to
maturity................ 3,623.2 127.5 7.04 3,606.5 125.6 6.96
Loans(2)(3).............. 3,808.9 145.3 7.63 3,185.8 120.8 7.58
-------- ------ -------- ------
Total interest-earning
assets................ 8,951.2 $328.4 7.34% 8,781.7 $319.0 7.27%
------ ----- -----
Other assets............. 405.5 305.9
-------- --------
$9,356.7 $9,087.6
======== ========
Liabilities
Deposits:
NOW and money market
accounts(4)............. $ 944.5 $ 16.0 3.38% $ 838.6 $ 11.3 2.69%
Passbook savings
deposits................ 315.2 3.6 2.28 368.0 4.2 2.28
Time deposits(4)......... 3,641.7 113.3 6.22 3,627.9 100.0 5.51
-------- ------ -------- ------
4,901.4 132.9 5.42 4,834.5 115.5 4.78
-------- ------ -------- ------
Borrowings:
Securities sold under
agreement to
repurchase.............. 1,109.5 30.4 5.49 1,526.9 45.1 5.91
Advances from FHLB......... 2,634.5 73.0 5.54 2,068.0 62.0 6.00
Other borrowings........... 47.6 2.4 10.26 47.5 2.4 10.29
-------- ------ -------- ------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities........... 8,693.0 $238.7 5.49% 8,476.9 $225.0 5.31%
------ ----- ------ -----
Other liabilities.......... 156.3 164.2
-------- --------
Stockholder's equity: 8,849.3 8,641.1
507.4 446.5
-------- --------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity.. $9,356.7 $9,087.6
======== ========
Net interest income........ $ 89.7 $ 94.0
====== ======
Interest rate spread(5).... 1.85% 1.96%
===== =====
Effective net spread(6).... 2.00% 2.14%
===== =====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) The securities available for sale are included in the following table at
historical cost with the corresponding average rate calculated upon
historical balances.
(2) Average balances include non accural loans. Interest on such loans is
included in interest income upon receipt.
(3) Interest includes amortization of deferred loan fees.
(4) Includes the effect of interest rate exchange agreements.
(5) Equals average rate earned on all assets minus average rate paid on all
liabilities.
(6) Net interest income annualized divided by average balances of all interest
earning assets.
At June 30, 1996, the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets was
7.26% and the weighted average cost on interest-bearing liabilities was 5.40%.
107
<PAGE>
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income
and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between changes related to
volume and those due to changes in interest rates. For each category of
interest income and interest expense, information is provided on changes
attributed to (i) changes in volume (i.e., changes in volume multiplied by
prior year rate) and (ii) changes in rate (i.e., changes in rate multiplied by
prior year volume). For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both
rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated to the change
due to rate.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
1996 VS. 1995 1996 VS. 1995
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
INCREASE (DECREASE) INCREASE (DECREASE)
DUE TO TOTAL DUE TO TOTAL
-------------------- INCREASE -------------------- INCREASE
VOLUME RATE (DECREASE) VOLUME RATE (DECREASE)
---------- --------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Loans................. $ 12,816 $ (1,341) $11.475 $ 23.618 $ 927 $24,545
Securities available
for sale............. (8,747) (587) (9,334) (17,404) 194 (17,210)
Securities held to
maturity............. (663) (1,858) (2,521) 631 1,311 1,942
Other earning assets.. 136 (52) 84 210 (76) 134
--------- --------- ------- --------- --------- -------
Total interest
income............. $ 3,542 $ (3,838) $ (296) $ 7,055 $ 2,356 $ 9,411
========= ========= ======= ========= ========= =======
Interest expense:
Deposits.............. $ 1,372 $ 1,343 $ 2,715 $ 1,557 $ 7,931 $ 9,488
Securities sold under
agreements to
repurchase........... (7,053) (1,672) (8,725) (12,341) (2,342) (14,683)
Advances from Federal
Home Loan Bank....... 8,560 (3,625) 4,935 16,988 (6,041) 10,947
Interest rate exchange
agreements........... (354) 3,520 3,166 (571) 8,556 7,985
--------- --------- ------- --------- --------- -------
Total interest
expense............ $ 2,525 $ (434) $ 2,091 $ 5,633 $ 8,104 $13,737
--------- --------- ------- --------- --------- -------
Change in net interest
income................. $ 1,017 $ (3,404) $(2,387) $ 1,422 $ (5,748) $(4,326)
========= ========= ======= ========= ========= =======
</TABLE>
PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON LOANS
The provision for losses on loans charged to earnings is based upon
management's judgement of the amount necessary to maintain the allowance for
loan losses at a level adequate to absorb probable losses. As part of the
process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses,
management performs quarterly detailed reviews to identify risks inherent in
the loan portfolio and to assess the overall quality of the portfolio as well
as to determine the amounts of allowances and provisions to be reported.
Based on the above mentioned analysis, the provision for losses on loans
recorded for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 1996 remained
unchanged from the same 1995 periods in the amounts of $300,000 and $600,000,
respectively.
NONINTEREST INCOME (LOSS)
Retail Banking Fees
Retail banking fees increased $759,000 to $3.5 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 1996 compared to $2.7 million for the three month period
ended June 30, 1995. Retail banking fees increased $1.4 million to $6.6
million for the six month period ended June 30, 1996 compared to $5.2 million
for the six month period ended June 30, 1995. The increases resulted from
increased levels of transaction account activities, primarily ATM fees,
returned check fees and telephone banking fees.
108
<PAGE>
Insurance and Brokerage Sales Commissions
Insurance and brokerage sales commissions decreased to $2.0 million for the
three month period ended June 30, 1996 when compared to $2.1 million for the
three month period ended June 30, 1995. Insurance and brokerage sales
commissions decreased to $3.7 million for the six month period ended June 30,
1996 when compared to $4.1 million for the six month period ended June 30,
1995. The decreases resulted from a decline in the sales of fixed annuities
and a resultant change in the mix of sales from principally fixed annuities to
a more equal blend of mutual funds and fixed annuities. While overall
investment product sales volumes are comparable on a year over year basis, the
change in mix, driven by market conditions, to mutual funds, with lower
resulting commissions, away from fixed annuity sales caused overall
commissions to decline.
Loan Servicing Fees, Net
Loan servicing fees, net increased to $2.7 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 1996 compared to $2.1 million for the three month period
ended June 30, 1995. Loan servicing fees, net increased to $4.7 million for
the six month period ended June 30, 1996 compared to $4.1 million for the six
month period ended June 30, 1995. Such increases were primarily the result of
the acquisition of approximately $2.2 billion of GNMA mortgage servicing
during the second quarter of 1996. This purchase increased the total size of
Roosevelt's servicing portfolio by greater than 40% to approximately $7.5
billion, or approximately 110,000 loans.
Net Gain (Loss) from Financial Instruments
In the conduct of its business operations, the Company has determined the
need to sell or terminate certain assets, liabilities, or off-balance sheet
positions due to various unforeseen events. Fundamental to the conduct of such
sale or termination activities is the effect such transactions will have on
the future volatility of the net market value of the Company. Consequently, in
pursuing these sale or termination of activities, the Company does not seek
net gains in a reporting period to the detriment of earnings in future
periods.
Net gain from financial instruments is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
----------------- -------------------
1996 1995 1996 1995
------- -------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mark to market of financial futures
contracts............................ $ -- $(27,752) $ -- $ (61,704)
Mortgage-backed securities available
for sale............................. 4,342 7,567 7,432 11,545
Options expense....................... (3,821) (2,750) (6,570) (5,580)
------- -------- -------- ---------
$ 521 $(22,935) $ 862 $ 55,739
======= ======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
MARK TO MARKET OF FINANCIAL FUTURES CONTRACTS
During the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 1995 losses of
$27.8 million and $61.7 million, respectively resulted from the mark to market
of the Company's financial futures positions used to reduce the interest rate
risk of certain mortgage-backed securities in the available for sale
portfolio. For further discussion see Note 1 of "Financial Statements of
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.--Consolidated Financial Statements for the
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 1996."
UNREALIZED LOSSES ON IMPAIRMENT OF MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
The Company purchased ownership interests in ten pools of privately issued
adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities issued in 1989 through 1991 by
Guardian Savings and Loan Association ("Guardian"). All of such Guardian pools
in which the Company purchased and currently holds an ownership interest were
rated AA or AAA by Standard & Poors and Aa2 or Aaa by Moodys, at the date of
issuance of the securities.
109
<PAGE>
Guardian issued their securities with several classes available for
purchase. Certain classes are subordinate to the position of senior classes in
that such subordinate classes absorb all credit losses and must be completely
eliminated before any losses flow to senior position holders. The Guardian
securities purchased by the Company (the "Guardian Securities") were purchases
of the most senior positions, thus intended to be protected by the
subordination credit enhancement feature.
Guardian was placed in conservatorship on June 21, 1991 by the Office of
Thrift Supervision, which appointed the Resolution Trust Corporation ("RTC")
as conservator. Subsequent to the conservatorship, the RTC replaced Guardian
as the servicer for the loans underlying the securities. Effective November
1994, Bank of America assumed servicing responsibilities from the RTC.
Guardian was a niche player in the California mortgage market whose lending
decisions relied more on the value of the mortgaged property and the
borrower's equity in the property and less on the borrower's income and credit
standing. All collateral underlying the Guardian Securities have the following
loan pool characteristics:
. First lien, 30 year, six month adjustable rate loans tied to either the
cost of funds index, one year constant maturity treasury rate, or LIBOR.
. 100% of the loans were originated in California.
. The weighted average loan to value ratio at origination was
approximately 66%.
Beginning in mid-1993 and continuing currently, the loan pools backing the
securities have been affected by high delinquency and foreclosure rates, and
higher than anticipated losses on the ultimate disposition of real estate
acquired through foreclosure ("REO"). This has resulted in rating agency
downgrades, principally in 1994 and again in 1995 and 1996 to the current
ratings reflected in the tables below and substantial deterioration in the
amount of the loss absorption capacity provided by the subordinated classes.
At December 31, 1994 and March 31, 1995, the Guardian securities owned by
the Company were performing according to their contractual terms, and all
realized losses from the disposition of REO were being absorbed by the
subordinate classes (or in the case of Pool 1990-7 at March 31, 1995, by
unamortized purchase discounts). However, to the extent that subsequent to
March 31, 1995, the pools continue to realize losses on the disposition of REO
at levels comparable to the then current rate, the remaining balances of the
subordinate classes may not be adequate to protect the Company from incurring
some credit losses on certain of its ten pools. As a result of this
deterioration and the continuing receipt of subsequent information, the
Company determined that the underlying investments represented by seven pools
in which, subsequent to March 31, 1995, the subordination protection has been
either totally eliminated or has become potentially inadequate should be
considered "other than temporarily" impaired under the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115. As a result of this determination,
the Company recorded a $22.0 million pre-tax write-down ($14.4 million after
tax or approximately $0.32 per share) for the three months ended March 31,
1995 to reflect the impairment of these seven pools. The amount of the write-
down was based on discounted cash flow analyses performed by management (based
upon assumptions regarding delinquency levels, foreclosure rates and loss
ratios on REO disposition in the underlying portfolio). Discounted cash flow
analyses were utilized to estimate fair value due to the absence of a ready
market for the Guardian Securities.
In addition to the Guardian Securities discussed above, the Company has an
investment of approximately $4.9 million at June 30, 1996 after the write-down
discussed below, in another private issuer mortgage-backed security, LB
Multifamily Mortgage Trust Series 1991-4 ("Lehman 91-4"), possessing similar
performance characteristics to the Guardian Securities that has also been
determined to be other than temporarily impaired. Accordingly, the Company
recorded a $5.1 million pre-tax write-down ($3.4 million after tax or
approximately $0.08 per share) to reflect the impairment of this security at
March 31, 1995.
Management believes that these write-downs are adequate based upon its
evaluation.
110
<PAGE>
As reflected in the following table, the Company's remaining investment at
June 30, 1996 in the Guardian Securities is approximately $62.3 million, after
the desecuritization of Guardian Pool 1990-9 discussed below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
Investment in Guardian Securities, March 31, 1995............ $118.9
Purchase of remaining senior position of Pool 1990-9......... .6
Net principal payments received.............................. (23.6)
Desecuritization of Guardian Pool 1990-9 (see discussion on
following page)............................................. (33.6)
------
Investment in Guardian Securities, June 30, 1996............. $ 62.3
======
</TABLE>
Subsequent to March 31, 1995, the date of the impairment charge, through
June 30, 1996 the following events have occurred with respect to the Guardian
Securities and Lehman 91-4.
. During the quarter ended June 30, 1995, the Company completed its
planned desecuritization of Guardian Pool 1990-9 and has assumed
servicing of the underlying whole loans and REO properties received
through the desecuritization. As a result of this process, $1.1 million
representing principal, interest and servicing related funds advanced by
previous servicers to certificate holders on properties which were in
REO at the time of the desecuritization was reimbursed to the servicer,
$28.8 million was transferred to mortgage loans and $2.7 million (net of
$4.9 million of charge-offs discussed below) was transferred to
residential REO. REO properties and properties in foreclosure were
written down $4.9 million to their estimated fair values by charges to
existing unallocated REO reserves ($1.4 million) and loan loss reserves
($1.8 million) and to existing unamortized purchase discounts ($1.7
million).
. As expected, there were several additional rating agency downgrades,
principally related to those Guardian pools that are no longer protected
by remaining credit enhancement and which had been determined to be
other than temporarily impaired and written down to estimated fair value
by the Company during the quarter ended March 31, 1995.
. As expected, based on the low levels remaining at March 31, 1995, the
subordination protection related to Guardian Pools 1990-1, 1990-2, 1990-
4, 1990-5 and Lehman 1991-4 was fully absorbed.
. The remaining two pools Guardian 89-11, and 90-8, determined at March
31, 1995 to be other than temporarily impaired and written down to
estimated fair value, continue to perform according to their contractual
terms and are protected by remaining subordination of 10.44% and 5.62%,
respectively, of the remaining unpaid principal balances of the pools.
Such remaining subordination percentages compare to original
subordination percentages of 8.50% and 14.00%, respectively.
. The two remaining Guardian pools (89-10 and 91-2), which are not
considered to be other than temporarily impaired, continue to perform
according to their contractual terms and are protected by remaining
subordination of 11.70% and 20.89%, respectively. These remaining
subordination levels compare to 8.50% and 17.00%, respectively, at the
date of issuance of the securities.
. $23.6 million in net principal payments have been received since March
31, 1995.
Accordingly, at June 30, 1996, management continues to believe that the
recorded investment in the above mentioned Guardian and Lehman pools is
recoverable.
Presented below is information at June 30, 1996 relating to the Company's
investment in the Guardian pools, segregated between the seven pools
determined to be other than temporarily impaired and the two pools which, in
the opinion of management, continue to be adequately protected from loss
through substantial remaining subordination. The immediately succeeding table
also includes information related to Lehman 91-4 which has been determined to
be other than temporarily impaired.
111
<PAGE>
POOLS DETERMINED TO BE OTHER THAN TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED
JUNE 30, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBORDINATION AS A
PERCENT OF REGARDING ROOSEVELT'S
RATING POOL BALANCE INTERESTS
----------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------------------
PERCENT OF
POOLS
CURRENT OR
LESS THAN
ISSUE ORIGINAL PAR REMAINING REMAINING 90 DAYS
POOL NUMBER DATE AGENCY AT ISSUE CURRENT AT ISSUE CURRENT AT ISSUE PAR INVESTMENT DELINQUENT
- ----------- -------- ------ -------- ------- --------- --------- ------------ --------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
GUARDIAN POOLS
89-11................. 11/30/89 S & P AA CCC 8.50% 10.44% $ 33,750 $ 7,626 $ 5,670 72%
Moody Aa2 B1
90-1.................. 1/30/90 S & P AA CC 8.50% -- 3,000 725 529 74%
Moody Aa2 B3
90-2.................. 2/27/90 S & P AA D 8.50% -- 27,500 6,271 4,489 78%
Moody Aa2 Caa
90-4.................. 4/30/90 S & P AA D 8.75% -- 46,428 12,173 9,097 69%
Moody Aa2 Caa
90-5.................. 5/31/90 S & P AA D 8.75% -- 45,000 13,623 10,989 75%
Moody Aa2 Caa
90-7.................. 7/25/90 S & P AA D 8.75% -- 68,025 19,042 14,031 71%
Moody Aa2 Caa
90-8.................. 9/21/90 S & P AAA CCC 14.00% 5.62% 15,000 4,436 3,266 71%
Moody Aaa B3
-------- ------- -------
Total Guardian........ $238,703 $63,896 $48,071
======== ======= =======
LEHMAN POOL
91-4.................. 7/30/91 S & P AA CCC- 23.00% -- $ 14,000 $ 9,483 $ 4,898 78%
Moody Aa3 Caa
======== ======= =======
</TABLE>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
GUARDIAN POOLS DETERMINED TO BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY REMAINING CREDIT
ENHANCEMENT
JUNE 30, 1996
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBORDINATION
AS A PERCENT OF
PERCENT OF REGARDING POOLS
RATING POOL BALANCE ROOSEVELT'S INTERESTS CURRENT OR
----------------------- ---------------- --------------------------------- LESS THAN
ISSUE ORIGINAL PAR REMAINING REMAINING 90 DAYS
POOL NUMBER DATE AGENCY AT ISSUE CURRENT AT ISSUE CURRENT AT ISSUE PAR INVESTMENT DELINQUENT
- ----------- -------- ------ -------- ------- -------- ------- ------------ --------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
89-10................... 10/27/89 S & P AA BBB- 8.50% 11.70% $ 9,000 $ 1,571 $ 1,587 75%
Moody Aa2 B3
91-2.................... 3/28/91 S & P AA BBB 17.00% 20.89% 39,831 12,675 12,675 73%
Moody Aaa Baa3
------- ------- -------
Totals.................. $48,831 $14,246 $14,262
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense
increased $1.7 million to $23.4 million for the three month period ended June
30, 1996 as compared to $21.7 million for the three month period ended June
30, 1995. Such increase was due primarily to a $2.1 million increase in
compensation and employee benefits and a $481,000 increase in other
noninterest expense which was partially offset by a $945,000 decrease in
federal insurance premiums. The increases in compensation and employee
benefits and other noninterest expense is primarily attributable to increased
costs associated with the mobilization of the Bank's retail efforts. The
decrease in Federal insurance premiums resulted from reductions in the rates
charged by the Federal Deposit
112
<PAGE>
Insurance Corporation on the Company's deposits insured by both the Bank
Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund.
General and administrative expense increased $1.9 million to $45.1 million
for the six month period ended June 30, 1996 as compared to $43.2 million for
the six month period ended June 30, 1995. Such increase was due primarily to a
$3.3 million increase in compensation and employee benefits and a $688,000
increase in other noninterest expense which was partially offset by a $1.8
million decrease in federal insurance premiums. The explanations of the
fluctuations are the same as those described above for the three month
periods.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets increased $314.7 million or 3.5% to $9.3 billion at June 30,
1996 from $9.0 billion at December 31, 1995. As a result of the Company's
focus on retail asset generation loans increased $438.8 million. During the
six month period ended June 30, 1996 the Bank originated $661.0 million in
loans and purchased $273.0 million in loans. These increases were offset by
principal repayments totaling $486.0 million. Securities available for sale
decreased $252.7 million primarily as a result of principal repayments and
sales of such securities totaling $667.8 million exceeding purchases which
totaled $432.2 million. Securities held to maturity decreased approximately
$15.8 million as a result of principal repayments exceeding purchases. Other
assets increased primarily as a result of payments for purchased mortgage
servicing rights totaling $36.1 million and fees paid for interest rate cap
agreements totaling $49.3 million.
Total liabilities increased $295.3 million or 3.5% to $8.8 billion at June
30, 1996 from $8.5 billion at December 31, 1995, principally the result of
increases in retail deposits and other short-term borrowings (Federal Home
Loan Bank advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase) of
$87.9 million and $233.6 million, respectively.
On July 31, 1996, the Company redeemed early, at par, its 9.5% subordinated
debentures in the amount of $28,750,000. The debentures which were issued in
1992 were otherwise set to mature August 1, 2002. As a result of such
redemption the Company will record an extraordinary charge to net income, net
of taxes, of approximately $500,000 in the three month period ended September
30, 1996. Such extraordinary loss relates to the write-off of the remaining
unamortized discount attributable to the issuance of the subordinated
debentures.
ASSET QUALITY
The following table sets forth the amounts and categories of non-performing
assets. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when the collection of
principal and/or interest becomes doubtful. Troubled debt restructurings
involve forgiving a portion of interest or principal on any loans or making
loans at a rate materially less than that of market rates. Foreclosed assets
include assets acquired in settlement of loans. "Other than temporarily
impaired" mortgage-backed securities represent private issuer mortgage-backed
securities that have been determined to be "other than temporarily impaired"
under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115
and for which the previously existing credit enhancement support, in the form
of subordination, has been totally absorbed and therefore any future losses
will flow directly to the Company as a senior position holder. These
securities were issued with several classes available for purchase. Certain
classes are subordinate to the position of senior classes in that such
subordinate classes absorb all credit losses and must be completely eliminated
before any losses flow to senior position holders. The securities purchased by
the Company were purchases of the most senior positions, thus intended to be
protected by the subordination credit enhancement feature. In an attempt
toward a conservative presentation, the Company includes the entire estimated
fair value of these securities (approximately 77% of the unpaid principal
balances at June 30, 1996) in this table when the credit enhancement, in the
form of subordination, is exhausted even though a substantial portion of the
underlying loans (approximately 72% at June 30, 1996) are either current or
less than 90 days delinquent. In addition, the remaining amount of "other than
temporarily impaired" mortgage-backed securities that continue to be protected
by remaining credit enhancement, but for which the Company has concluded it is
probable that such credit enhancement will be absorbed before the duration of
the underlying security, are
113
<PAGE>
disclosed in the paragraphs following the table as other potential problem
assets. See "--Unrealized Losses on Impairment of Mortgage-Backed Securities
Held to Maturity."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995
-------- ------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
NONACCRUING LOANS:
Residential............................................ $ 7,563 $ 7,895
Commercial real estate................................. 1,933 1,415
Consumer............................................... 304 193
------- -------
Total................................................ 9,800 9,503
------- -------
ACCRUING LOANS DELINQUENT MORE THAN 90 DAYS:
Residential............................................ 10,160 10,500
------- -------
TROUBLED-DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS:
Commercial real estate................................. 58 661
------- -------
FORECLOSED ASSETS:
Residential............................................ 4,403 5,340
Commercial real estate................................. 10,765 11,483
Consumer............................................... 119 11
------- -------
Total................................................ 15,287 16,834
------- -------
Sub-total............................................ 35,305 37,498
------- -------
SUB-TOTAL NONPERFORMING ASSETS AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL ASSETS........................................ .38% .42%
======= =======
"OTHER THAN TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED" MORTGAGE-BACKED
SECURITIES WITH APPROXIMATELY 72% OF THE UNDERLYING
LOANS EITHER CURRENT OR LESS THAN 90 DAYS DELINQUENT.... 44,033 43,429
------- -------
Total non-performing assets.............................. $79,338 $80,927
======= =======
TOTAL AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ASSETS.................... .85% .90%
======= =======
</TABLE>
Not included in the preceding table are certain pools of private issuer
mortgage-backed securities with a carrying value of $8.9 million which were
performing according to their contractual terms at June 30, 1996. However,
these securities were determined by the Company to be "other than temporarily
impaired" and written down to fair value, since at March 31, 1995, the
subordination protection had been substantially reduced to the point where the
Company concluded it was probable that the securities would not continue to
perform to 100% of their contractual terms over the course of their remaining
lives. These securities will be included in the preceding non-performing asset
table in future periods when, and if, the remaining subordination is
exhausted.
The following table is a reconciliation of the amount of currently
performing, other than temporarily impaired mortgage-backed securities at
March 31, 1995 to such amount at June 30, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IN MILLIONS
-----------
<S> <C>
Amount of currently performing, other than temporarily impaired
mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 1995.................. $ 52.4
Principal payments received.................................... (8.6)
Addition of Guardian Pools 1990-1, 1990-2, 1990-4 and 1990-5
and Lehman Pool 91-4 to the non-performing asset table as
subordination protection was absorbed since March 31, 1995.... (34.9)
------
Amount of currently performing, other than temporarily impaired
mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 1996................... $ 8.9
======
</TABLE>
114
<PAGE>
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
The Company's primary objective regarding asset/liability management is to
position the Company such that changes in interest rates do not have a
material adverse impact upon net interest income or the net market value of
the Company. The Company's primary strategy for accomplishing its
asset/liability management objective is achieved by matching the weighted
average maturities of assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet items
(duration matching). Integral to the duration matching strategy is the use of
derivative financial instruments such as interest rate exchange agreements and
interest rate cap and floor agreements. The Company uses derivative financial
instruments solely for risk management purposes. None of the Company's
derivative instruments are what are termed leveraged instruments. These types
of instruments are riskier than the derivatives used by the Company in that
they have embedded options that enhance their performance in certain
circumstances but dramatically reduce their performance in other
circumstances. The Company is not a dealer nor does it make a market in such
instruments. The Company does not trade the instruments and the Board of
Directors' approved policy governing the Company's use of these instruments
strictly forbids speculation of any kind.
Net market value is calculated by adjusting stockholders' equity for
differences between the estimated fair values and the carrying values
(historical cost basis) of the Company's assets, liabilities, and off-balance
sheet items. Net market value, as calculated by the Company and presented
herein, should not be confused with the value of the Company's stock or of the
amounts distributable to stockholders in connection with a sale of the Company
or in the unlikely event of its liquidation. The economic net market value
(including the estimated value of demand deposits) as calculated by the
Company increased to approximately $504.3 million at June 30, 1996 as compared
to approximately $481.5 million at December 31, 1995. To measure the impact of
interest rate changes, the Company recalculates its net market value on a pro
forma basis assuming instantaneous, permanent parallel shifts in the yield
curve, in varying amounts both upward and downward. Larger increases or
decreases in the Company's net market value as a result of these assumed
interest rate changes indicate greater levels of interest rate sensitivity
than do smaller increases or decreases in net market value. The Company
endeavors to maintain a position whereby it experiences no material change in
net market value as a result of assumed 100 and 200 basis point increases and
decreases in general levels of interest rates.
The OTS issued a regulation, effective January 1, 1994, which uses a similar
methodology to measure the interest rate risk exposure of thrift institutions.
This exposure is a measure of the potential decline in the net portfolio value
of the institution based upon the effect of an assumed 200 basis point
increase or decrease in interest rates. "Net portfolio value" is the present
value of the expected net cash flow from the institution's assets,
liabilities, and off-balance sheet contracts. Under the OTS regulation, an
institution's "normal" level of interest rate risk in the event of this
assumed change in interest rates is a decrease in the institution's net
portfolio value in an amount not exceeding two percent of the present value of
its assets.
Utilizing this measurement concept, the interest rate risk of the Company at
June 30, 1996 is as follows and reflects that the Company's level of interest
rate risk is far below that which is considered "normal" by the OTS in its
regulation.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(UNAUDITED)
----------------------------------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Basis point changes in interest
rates............................... -200 -100 +100 +200
Changes in net market value due to
changes in interest rates (Company
methodology)........................ $ (30,813) $(5,133) $(15,005) $ (47,126)
Interest rate exposure deemed
"normal" by the OTS................. $ (186,555) N/A N/A $(186,555)
</TABLE>
The Company's operating strategy is designed to avoid material changes in
net market value as a result of fluctuations in interest rates. As of June 30,
1996, the Company believes it has accomplished its objectives as the pro forma
changes in net market value brought about by changes in interest rates are not
material relative to the Company's net market value. A net loss when rates
increase indicates the duration of the Company's assets is slightly longer
than the duration of the Company's liabilities. A loss when rates decrease is
due primarily to
115
<PAGE>
borrowers prepaying their loans resulting in the Company's assets repricing
down more quickly than the Company can reprice its liabilities.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OTS regulations require federally insured savings institutions to maintain a
specified ratio (presently 5.0%) of cash and short-term United States
Government, government agency, and other specified securities to net
withdrawable accounts and borrowings due within one year. The Company has
maintained liquidity ratios in excess of the required amounts during the six
month period ended June 30, 1996 and during 1995.
The Company's cash flows are comprised of cash flows from operating,
investing and financing activities. Cash flows provided by operating
activities, consisting primarily of interest received on investments
(principally loans and mortgage-backed securities) less interest paid on
deposits and other short-term borrowings, were $45.7 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 1996. Net cash related to investing activities,
consisting primarily of purchases of mortgage-backed securities held to
maturity and available for sale and originations and purchases of loans,
offset by principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities and loans and
sales of mortgage-backed securities available for sale, utilized $236.8
million for the six month period ended June 30, 1996. Net cash related to
financing activities, consisting of proceeds, net of repayments, from FHLB
advances, proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
excess of deposit receipts over withdrawals flows provided $239.9 million for
the six month period ended June 30, 1996.
At June 30, 1996, the Company had commitments outstanding to originate
fixed-rate mortgage loans of approximately $39.4 million and adjustable-rate
mortgages of approximately $106.4 million. At June 30, 1996, the Company had
outstanding commitments to purchase adjustable-rate mortgage loans of
approximately $24.7 million. At June 30, 1996, the Company had outstanding
commitments to purchase mortgage-backed securities of approximately $91.6
million. The Company expects to satisfy such commitments through its primary
source of funds.
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989
(FIRREA) requires that an institution meet three specific capital
requirements: a leverage ratio of core capital to total adjusted assets, a
tangible capital ratio expressed as a percent of total tangible assets and a
risk-based capital standard expressed as a percent of risk-adjusted assets. As
of June 30, 1996, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital standards as
follows (dollars in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
REQUIREMENT ACTUAL EXCESS CAPITAL
-------------- -------------- --------------
CAPITAL STANDARD AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
---------------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tangible Capital................ $139.5 1.50% $511.9 5.50% $372.4 4.00%
Core Capital.................... $279.0 3.00% $514.0 5.53% $235.0 2.53%
Risk-based Capital.............. $293.2 8.00% $533.1 14.55% $239.9 6.55%
</TABLE>
116
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each
executive officer of the Company and the Bank.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION HELD
---- --- -------------
<C> <C> <S>
Stanley J. Bradshaw................... 38 Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
Anat Bird............................. 44 Director, Senior Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating
Officer
Gary W. Douglass...................... 45 Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
</TABLE>
The following is a description of the principal occupation and employment of
the executive officers of the Company and the Bank during at least the last
five years. Except as otherwise indicated, all officers of the Company have
held their positions since the formation of the Company in 1988.
Stanley J. Bradshaw. Mr. Bradshaw joined Roosevelt in 1985 as Vice President
and Chief Landing Officer and in 1987 was elected Senior Vice President and
Chief Investment Officer. During 1988, he was elected Executive Vice President
and became Roosevelt's Chief Operating Officer. He joined the Board of
Directors and became President and Chief Executive Officer in 1991 and
Chairman of the Board in April 1996.
Anat Bird. Mrs. Bird joined the Company and the Bank as Senior Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in July 1995. In January 1991, Mrs.
Bird founded the Financial Institutions Consulting Group (FICG) at BDO
Seidman, New York, New York and developed and managed FICG through June 1994.
In June 1994, Mrs. Bird Founded SCB Forums, LTD. (SCB), a financial
institutions consulting firm located in New York City and the successor to
FinExc Group, L.L.C.
Gary W. Douglass. Mr. Douglass joined the Company and the Bank as Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on March 9, 1995. Prior to joining
the Company and the Bank, Mr. Douglass was a partner for Deloitte & Touche
LLP, a big six international accounting firm where he was the partner in
charge of the accounting and auditing function and financial institution
practice of the firm's St. Louis office.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each
director of the Company who is not an executive officer of the Company and the
Bank.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR FIRST TERM TO
NAME AGE POSITION ELECTED EXPIRE
---- --- -------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Douglas T. Breeden.............................. 45 Director 1990 1998
Richard E. Beumer............................... 57 Director 1986 1999
Bradbury Dyer III............................... 53 Director 1994 1999
Alvin D. Vitt................................... 60 Director 1981 1999
Robert M. Clayton II............................ 55 Director 1974 1998
Patricia M. Gammon.............................. 46 Director 1994 1997
Hiram S. Liggett, Jr. .......................... 63 Director 1978 1997
Clarence M. Turley, Jr.......................... 67 Director 1968 1997
</TABLE>
The business experience of each director for at least the past five years
who is not also an executive officer of the Company is as follows:
Dr. Douglas T. Breeden. Dr. Breeden is Chairman of the Board of Smith
Breeden Associates, Inc., a money management firm that manages money for and
advises mutual funds, pension funds, municipalities, private entities and
banks, including Roosevelt Bank. Dr. Breeden is also a Research Professor of
Finance at the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Dr. Breeden also
served as Vice Chairman of the Board from May 1992 to June 1995 and as
Chairman of the Board of the Company from June 1995 to April 1996.
117
<PAGE>
Richard E. Beumer. Mr. Beumer is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Sverdrup Corporation, an international engineering, design, development and
construction company headquartered in St. Louis.
Bradbury Dyer III. Mr. Dyer is managing agent of Paragon Joint Venture and a
general partner of Paragon Associates and Paragon Associates II, private
investment partnerships in Dallas, Texas, positions he has held since 1972.
Mr. Dyer is also a Director of Great American Management & Investment, Inc.,
Capsure Holdings Corp. and Falcon Building Products.
Alvin D. Vitt. Mr. Vitt is Chairman and President of Alvin D. Vitt &
Company, a real estate development company in St. Louis.
Robert M. Clayton II. Mr. Clayton is a partner in the law firm of Clayton,
Curl & Clayton in Hannibal, Missouri.
Patricia M. Gammon. Ms. Gammon is Vice President of Blackstone Alternative
Asset Management, an investment management firm located in New York, New York.
From 1978 to December 1995, Ms. Gammon served as Director of Investments for
Yale University.
Hiram S. Liggett, Jr. Mr. Liggett is President of Liggett Consulting
Services, Inc. From December 1989 to August 1992, Mr Liggett served as a
special consultant to Keystone Consulting Group. From August 1987 to November
1988, he served as a special consultant to Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Missouri.
Mr. Liggett retired in August 1986 as Vice President of Brown Group, Inc., a
shoe manufacturing and sales company in St. Louis.
Clarence M. Turley, Jr. Mr. Turley is Vice Chairman of the Board of Colliers
Turley Martin Company, a commercial real estate company in St. Louis.
118
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation for
services in all capacities to the Company and the Bank for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
the other four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company and
the Bank, whose respective salaries and bonuses exceeded $100,000 in 1995 (the
"named officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM
ANNUAL COMPENSATION COMPENSATION
---------------------------- ------------
OTHER
ANNUAL
COMPEN- SECURITIES
NAME AND PRINCIPAL SATION UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS ($) OPTIONS COMPENSATION
------------------ ---- -------- -------- ------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Stanley J. Bradshaw,
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief
Executive Officer...... 1995 $400,000 $125,000 $ -- 25,000 $ 9,846(2)
1994 335,000 251,250 -- 75,000 9,843(2)
1993 290,000 174,000 -- 60,000(1) 15,008(2)
Anat Bird, Senior
Executive Vice
President and Chief
Operating Officer(3)... 1995 137,500 35,000 196,663(4) 40,000 24(5)
1994 -- -- -- -- --
1993 -- -- -- -- --
Gary W. Douglass,
Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer(3)... 1995 162,179 50,000 -- 35,000 56(5)
1994 -- -- -- -- --
1993 -- -- -- -- --
Dennis M. Kiefer,
Executive Vice
President(6)........... 1995 158,033 -- -- -- 9,088(7)
1994 165,000 123,750 -- 30,000 9,843(7)
1993 150,000 90,000 -- 24,000(1) 13,715(7)
Daniel P. Sneed, Senior
Vice President(3)...... 1995 116,375 31,255(8) -- 4,000 3,363(9)
1994 69,962 -- -- -- 48(9)
1993 -- -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) As adjusted for the Company's three-for-one stock split in the form of a
200% stock dividend effective May 18, 1994.
(2) Matching contributions to Mr. Bradshaw's account in the Bank's 401(k)
Plan, contributions under the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the
"ESOP") and life insurance premiums, respectively, for (i) 1995--$9,000,
$750, and $96; (ii) 1994--$9,000, $750 and $93; and (iii) 1993--$14,150,
$750 and $108.
(3) Mrs. Bird, Mr. Douglass and Mr. Sneed assumed their positions with the
Company and the Bank on July 17, 1995, March 9, 1995 and April 23, 1994,
respectively.
(4) Value adjustment on prior home, reimbursement for taxes, relocation
expenses and employee benefit expenses of $89,500, $79,528, $25,535 and
$2,100, respectively.
(5) Life insurance premiums paid on the officer's behalf.
(6) Mr. Kiefer retired from his positions with the Company and the Bank as of
November 30, 1995.
(7) Matching contributions to Mr. Kiefer's account in the Bank's 401(k) Plan,
contributions under the ESOP and life insurance premiums, respectively,
for (i) 1995--$9,000, $0 and $88; (ii) 1994--$9,000, $750 and $93; and
(iii) 1993--$12,857, $750 and $108; and (iii) 1992--$9,900, $750 and $0.
(8) Represents the fair market value on November 21, 1995 of 1,866 shares of
restricted Common Stock awarded to Mr. Sneed on such date. The restricted
Common Stock vested on December 21, 1995.
(9) Matching contributions to Mr. Sneed's account in the Bank's 401(k) Plan,
contributions under the ESOP and life insurance premiums, respectively,
for (i) 1995--$2,517, $750 and $96; and (ii) 1994--$0, $0 and $48.
119
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of
stock options pursuant to the Stock Option Plan to the named officers in 1995.
No stock appreciation rights ("SARs") were granted in 1995.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
-------------------------
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL
SECURITIES OPTIONS
UNDERLYING GRANTED PER SHARE GRANT DATE
OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES EXERCISE EXPIRATION PRESENT
NAME GRANTED(1) IN FISCAL YEAR PRICE DATE VALUE(2)
---- ---------- -------------- --------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Stanley J. Bradshaw..... 25,000 10.37% $18.000 12/19/00 $102,000
Anat Bird............... 35,000 16.59 15.500 07/27/00 117,250
5,000 -- 16.750 11/21/00 18,550
Gary W. Douglass........ 20,000 14.52 16.625 03/09/00 76,400
15,000 16.750 11/21/00 55,650
Dennis M. Kiefer........ -- -- -- -- --
Daniel P. Sneed......... 4,000 1.66 16.750 11/21/00 14,840
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Five-year options which are exercisable immediately.
(2) Based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model adapted for use in valuing
stock options. The actual value, if any, an executive may realize will
depend on the excess of the stock price over the exercise price on the
date the option is exercised, so there is no assurance that the value
realized by an executive will be at or near the value estimated by the
Black-Scholes model. The estimated values under that model are based on
various assumptions, as discussed below.
The Black-Scholes option pricing model used for purposes of the table
above reflects an implied price volatility of 32.92%. In making this
assumption, the Stock Option Committee of the Company noted that the
Company exhibited a beta of less than 1 and that the implied volatility of
the S&P 500 Index Options was approximately 12%. The Stock Option
Committee further assumed that the term of the options was five years and
that the then dividend yield of approximately 3.40% would remain constant.
The risk free rate was assumed to be above 4.83% for all relevant periods.
No diminution of value was considered due to the option holder's inability
to transfer his rights under the option agreements.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the exercise
of options during 1995 and the number and value of unexercised stock options
at December 31, 1995 held by the named officers. None of the named officers
held any SARs at December 31, 1995 or exercised any SARs during 1995.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FY-END OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
OPTIONS AT FY-END AT FY-END(2)
-------------------------- -------------------------
SHARES
ACQUIRED VALUE
NAME ON EXERCISE REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- ----------- ---------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Stanley J. Bradshaw..... 7,500 $ 97,815 332,500(1) -- $3,185,553 $--
Anat Bird............... -- -- 40,000 -- 148,750 --
Gary W. Douglass........ -- -- 35,000 -- 94,375 --
Dennis M. Kiefer........ 119,116 1,593,177 76,500(1) -- 568,140 --
Daniel P. Sneed......... -- -- 11,500 -- 53,625 --
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) As adjusted for the Company's three-for-one stock split in the form of a
200% stock dividend effective May 18, 1995.
(2) The difference between the aggregate option exercise price and the fair
market value of the underlying shares at December 31, 1995.
120
<PAGE>
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERFORMANCE
OR OTHER
NUMBER OF PERIOD UNTIL
SHARES MATURATION
NAME (#)(1) OR PAYOUT (1)
---- --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Stanley J. Bradshaw.................................... 35,000 10 years
Anat Bird.............................................. 30,000 10 years
Gary W. Douglass....................................... 20,000 10 years
Dennis M. Kiefer....................................... -- --
Daniel P. Sneed........................................ -- --
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Awards consist of shares of restricted Common Stock which will vest, if
not earlier forfeited due to termination or separation from the Company,
on June 22, 2005, if and only if the Common Stock has experienced 20
consecutive days of trading at a price equal to or above $56.64 per share.
In addition, the vesting of Mr. Bradshaw's restricted shares may be wholly
or partially accelerated, at the option of the Stock Option Committee,
upon a change in control of the Company. Restricted shares awarded to Mrs.
Bird and Mr. Douglass will vest immediately upon a change in control of
the Company.
PENSION PLANS
The Bank's employees are eligible to participate in the Financial
Institutions Retirement Fund (the "FIRF"), a multiple employer pension plan.
Annual benefits under the FIRF cannot exceed the Internal Revenue Service
maximum annual benefit for 1995 of $109,091 under the standard form elected by
the Bank. Benefits in excess of this amount are provided to certain executive
officers through a supplemental retirement plan (together with the FIRF, the
"Pension Plans"). The following table sets forth annual pension benefits
payable upon retirement under the Pension Plans.
PENSION PLAN TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS OF SERVICE
-----------------------------------
COMPENSATION 15 20 25 30
- ------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$125,000.................................... $ 37,500 $ 50,000 $ 62,500 $ 75,000
150,000..................................... 45,000 60,000 75,000 90,000
175,000..................................... 52,500 70,000 87,500 105,000
200,000..................................... 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000
225,000..................................... 67,500 90,000 112,500 135,000
250,000..................................... 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000
300,000..................................... 90,000 120,000 150,000 180,000
350,000..................................... 105,000 140,000 175,000 210,000
400,000..................................... 120,000 160,000 200,000 240,000
450,000..................................... 135,000 180,000 225,000 270,000
500,000..................................... 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000
550,000..................................... 165,000 220,000 275,000 330,000
600,000..................................... 180,000 240,000 300,000 360,000
650,000..................................... 195,000 260,000 325,000 390,000
700,000..................................... 210,000 280,000 350,000 420,000
750,000..................................... 225,000 300,000 375,000 450,000
</TABLE>
The Pension Plans are non-contributory, defined benefit retirement plans.
For purposes of the Pension Plans, compensation means salary, cash bonus
awards and other forms of cash compensation. Cash compensation does not
include employer contributions pursuant to the Company's and the Bank's
retirement and benefit plans and amounts attributable to other miscellaneous
benefits received by executive officers. Accordingly, the covered compensation
set forth in the table above relates only to salary and bonus as reported in
the Summary Compensation Table. Benefits under the Pension Plans are based on
the average of the lifetime highest three years of compensation and years of
service, with the payment being computed on the basis of straight life annuity
benefits. Such benefits are not offset by the recipient's primary Social
Security benefits. At December 31, 1995, Mr. Bradshaw had ten years of
creditable service under the Pension Plans. Mrs. Bird, Mr. Douglass and
Mr. Sneed had no years of service under the Pension Plans at December 31,
1995. Mr. Kiefer retired on November 30, 1995 with 25 years of creditable
service under the Pension Plans.
121
<PAGE>
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Fees. Directors' fees are paid to non-employee directors only, in the amount
of $2,083 per month plus an additional $500 for each regular meeting attended,
and $1,000 per special board meeting attended in person or $450 for
participation in a special meeting by telephone. Non-employee members of the
Bank's Audit and Compensation Committees and the Company's Stock Option
Committee (except for the chairman of each such committee) receive $1,000 per
meeting attended in person and $300 for participation by telephone. The
chairman of each committee receives $1,250 for each meeting attended in person
and $300 for participation by telephone. The Chairman of the Company's
Executive Committee receives $2,500 for each meeting attended while each other
committee member receives $1,250 for each meeting attended in person and $300
for participation by telephone.
Retirement Pension Plan for Outside Directors. The Board of Directors has
adopted a non-qualified unfunded Retirement Pension Plan for Outside Directors
(the "Retirement Plan"), which was ratified by stockholders at the Company's
1989 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Retirement Plan provides for payment
of a pension to former non-employee directors beginning at the later of age 65
or the date upon which service as a director ceases.
Under the terms of the Retirement Plan, benefits are payable in monthly
installments to the retired director (or such director's surviving spouse) for
15 years. In order to be eligible to receive the pension benefit, the director
must have served as a member of the Board of Directors for not less than ten
years.
Directors having ten years of service are entitled to an annual benefit
equal to 40% of the average annual director's fees (exclusive of any special
meeting fees or committee fees) for the three consecutive years in which such
average is greater than the average of any other three consecutive years. The
benefit level increases by an additional 6% of average annual director's fees,
as previously defined, for each additional year of service, provided that the
maximum benefit to any participant will not exceed 70% of such participant's
average annual director's fees. Accordingly, maximum benefits under the
Retirement Plan are earned and vested after 15 years of service. Messrs.
Turley, Liggett and Clayton have more than 15 years of service. The years of
service applicable to Messrs. Beumer, Vitt, Breeden, Dyer and Gammon are ten,
fourteen, five, one and one, respectively.
122
<PAGE>
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS OF
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Prior to the enactment on August 9, 1989, of the Financial Institutions
Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"), the Bank, like many
savings associations, followed a policy of granting loans with favorable
interest rates to eligible officers, directors and employees, generally for
the financing of their personal residences and for consumer purposes. Under
FIRREA, all loans and extensions of credit to the executive officers and
directors of the Bank and their related entities must be on substantially the
same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at
the time for comparable transactions with other persons. The Bank has
continued its policy of granting loans with favorable interest rates only for
employees other than executive officers and directors. The balance at December
31, 1995 of all loans by the Company or its subsidiaries to the directors,
executive officers and other affiliated persons of the Company or of its
subsidiaries totaled $421,052, or .08% of stockholders' equity at that date.
In addition, all loans and other comparable transactions between the Bank or
the Company and its executive officers, directors, controlling persons, or
affiliated interests of any of the foregoing are subject to approval of a
majority of the disinterested directors of the Bank or Company, as the case
may be.
Set forth below is certain information as of December 31, 1995 as to loans
made by the Bank to each of its directors and executive officers whose
aggregate indebtedness to the Bank exceeded $60,000 at any time since January
1, 1995. The loans designated in the table below as residential loans are
first mortgage loans secured by the borrower's current principal place of
residence.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LARGEST
AGGREGATE
AMOUNT
OUTSTANDING BALANCE INTEREST
DATE NATURE OF SINCE AS OF RATE AS OF
NAME AND POSITION OF LOAN INDEBTEDNESS 01/01/95 12/31/95 12/31/95
----------------- -------- ------------ ----------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Hiram S. Liggett, Jr. ... 12/01/86 Residential $100,180 $ 89,363 8.56%
Director
Ronald L. Cawood......... 09/16/92 Residential 192,669 189,929 6.13
Senior Vice President
Terry F. Grzina.......... 12/01/93 Residential 77,236 75,914 4.51
Senior Vice President
Gerald M. Klug........... 06/01/87 Home Equity 12,961 12,172 9.00
Senior Vice President 12/09/93 Residential 102,312 -- --
and Controller
John R. Mason............ 06/08/89 Residential 54,444 53,674 8.75
Senior Vice President
</TABLE>
In 1990, the Bank entered into consulting agreements with Vitt & Company to
provide consulting services to the Bank in connection with the acquisition and
development of real estate and the construction and relocation of certain
branch office facilities. Mr. Vitt also is a partner in the Kirkwood Housing
Partnership, which owns property leased by the Bank for a branch office.
During 1995, the aggregate amount of fees and expenses paid to Vitt & Company
and the Kirkwood Housing Partnership pursuant to the consulting arrangements
and lease agreement was $96,516.
Douglass T. Breeden, a director of Roosevelt, is also Chairman of the Board
of Smith Breeden Associates, Inc. ("Smith Breeden"). Smith Breeden is a money
management firm that provides the Bank with certain investment consulting
services, including advice on asset/liability management and analysis.
Approval of the retention of Smith Breeden is reviewed annually by the Board,
in accordance with the terms of the Bank's Director and Officer Conflict of
Interest Policy, without the participation of Dr. Breeden. For the year ended
December 31, 1995, Smith Breeden received approximately $1.3 million in fees
and expenses from the Bank.
123
<PAGE>
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF
OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
As of October 1, 1996, the Company had 42,157,516 shares of Common Stock
issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth, as of December 31,
1995, certain information as to (i) those persons who were known by management
to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock, (ii) the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the executive
officers named below, (iii) the shares beneficially owned by directors who are
not Executive Officers, and (iv) the shares beneficially owned by all
directors and executive officers as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK PERCENT OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED CLASS
---------------- ------------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Jurika & Voyles, Inc............................. 3,035,779(1) 7.23%
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 700
Oakland, California 94612
NAMED OFFICERS(2)
Stanley J. Bradshaw.............................. 601,473 1.43
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer
Anat Bird........................................ 72,772 .17
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer
Gary W. Douglass................................. 60,500 .13
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Daniel P. Sneed.................................. 29,500 .07
Senior Vice President
DIRECTORS WHO ARE NOT NAMED OFFICERS(2)
Douglas T. Breeden............................... 280,468 .67
Richard E. Beumer................................ 46,075 .11
Bradbury Dyer III................................ 281,096 .67
Alvin D. Vitt.................................... 60,606 .14
Robert M. Clayton II............................. 50,066 .12
Patrick M. Gammon................................ 9,150 .02
Hiram S. Liggett, Jr............................. 42,330 .10
Clarence M. Turley, Sr........................... 43,920 .10
All directors and executive officers as a group
(18 persons).................................... 1,716,419 4.07
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) As reported by Jurika & Voyles, Inc. ("Jurika"), a registered investment
advisor, in Amendment No. One to a statement as of December 31, 1995 on
Schedule 13G under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Jurika reported shared voting power as to 2,885,779
shares, shared dispositive power as to 3,035,779 shares and sole voting
and dispositive powers as to no shares.
(2) Includes shares held directly, in retirement accounts, in a fiduciary
capacity or by certain affiliated entities or members of the named
individuals' families, as well as 332,500, 40,000, 35,000, 11,500, 6,000,
18,500, 9,000, 16,500, 9,000, 9,000, 19,500 and 9,000 and 583,000 shares,
which Mr. Bradshaw, Mrs. Bird, Mr. Douglass, Mr. Sneed, Mr. Breeden, Mr.
Beumer, Mr. Dyer, Mr. Vitt, Mr. Clayton, Ms. Gammon, Mr. Liggett, Mr.
Turley and all directors and executive officers as a group, respectively,
have the right to purchase pursuant to stock options granted under the
Company's Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the
"Stock Option Plan") or the Company's 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan (the "Director Plan"), with respect to which shares the named
individuals and group may be deemed to have sole voting and dispositive
powers.
124
<PAGE>
BUSINESS OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
GENERAL
Sentinel was incorporated on September 23, 1993 for the purpose of becoming
the holding company for Sentinel Federal upon completion of the Conversion.
The Conversion was completed on January 7, 1994. Sentinel has not engaged in
any significant activity other than holding the stock of Sentinel Federal.
Accordingly, the information set forth in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
including financial statements and related data, relates primarily to Sentinel
Federal and its subsidiaries.
Sentinel Federal was organized in 1919 as a Missouri mutual savings and loan
association under the name "Baptist Savings and Loan Association of Kansas
City." In 1935, Sentinel Federal converted to a federally chartered savings
and loan association and changed its name to "Sentinel Federal Savings and
Loan Association of Kansas City." Sentinel Federal is regulated by the OTS and
its deposits are insured up to applicable limits under the SAIF of the FDIC.
Sentinel Federal also is a member of the FHLB system.
At June 30, 1996, Sentinel had total assets of $143.8 million, deposits of
$123.3 million and stockholders' equity of $11.5 million.
Sentinel Federal's principal business consists of attracting deposits from
the general public, originating loans secured primarily by owner-occupied
residential properties and purchasing mortgage-related securities through the
secondary market. Approximately 96.2% of Sentinel Federal's first mortgage
loans are secured by properties located within Missouri. Sentinel Federal's
residential real estate mortgage loans amounted to $78.5 million or 95.0% of
Sentinel Federal's net loan portfolio at June 30, 1996. To a significantly
lesser extent, Sentinel Federal also originates consumer, commercial real
estate, and commercial business loans.
On December 20, 1989, Sentinel Federal entered into a Supervisory Agreement
with the OTS as a result of OTS criticisms of Sentinel Federal's policies and
operations and its reduced capital position. In May 1990, Sentinel Federal
also signed a Capital Plan agreement as a result of its low level of core
capital. The Capital Plan was terminated on June 1, 1994 due to increases in
capital levels primarily as a result of the initial public offering in
connection with the Conversion. However, the Supervisory Agreement remains in
effect until terminated by the OTS. The Supervisory Agreement requires
Sentinel Federal to follow certain limitations primarily relating to Sentinel
Federal's internal operations, lending activities and investments.
LENDING ACTIVITIES
General. The primary lending activity of Sentinel Federal is originating
one- to four-family adjustable and fixed-rate residential loans, based on
Sentinel Federal's and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
("FHLMC")/Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") underwriting
standards.
The types of loans historically originated by Sentinel Federal include
single-family and multi-family residential loans, residential lot and
construction loans, home equity loans, commercial real estate loans and
savings account loans. Sentinel Federal attracts retail deposits from the
general public and invests those deposits, together with funds generated from
operating income, primarily in one- to four-family mortgage loans and
mortgage-related securities. Sentinel Federal's revenues are derived
principally from interest on its mortgage loan and mortgage-related securities
portfolios. Sentinel Federal's primary sources of funds are proceeds from
deposits, FHLB advances and from principal and interest payments on loans and
mortgage-related securities.
Sentinel Federal requires that mortgage loans be secured by first or second
liens on one- to four-family residential dwellings. The primary purpose of the
loans is for the purchase or refinancing or construction of these properties.
As of June 30, 1996, $75.9 million, or 91.8% of Sentinel Federal's loan
portfolio, consisted of loans secured by one- to four-family residential
properties, $3.1 million, or 3.7% of loans, consisted of commercial real
estate and $2.7 million, or 3.2%, consisted of multi-family permanent loans.
125
<PAGE>
Loan Portfolio Analysis. The following table sets forth the composition of
Sentinel Federal's loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30,
-----------------------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
--------------- --------------- ---------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
(DOLLARSD IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Conventional mortgage......... $64,162 88% $70,680 85% $71,025 84%
Federal Housing Administration
and Veterans'
Administration............... 7,098 10 6,377 8 6,333 8
Commercial.................... 604 1 2,195 3 2,576 3
Construction.................. 267 -- 1,235 2 1,627 2
------- --- ------- --- ------- ---
Total mortgage loans...... 72,131 99 80,487 98 81,561 97
------- --- ------- --- ------- ---
Other Loans:
Home equity and second mort-
gage loans................... 286 -- 864 1 1, 951 3
Automobile loans.............. 47 -- 47 -- 138 --
Other......................... 386 1 477 1 396 --
------- --- ------- --- ------- ---
Total other loans......... 719 1 1,388 2 2,485 3
------- --- ------- --- ------- ---
Total loans............... 72,850 100% 81,875 100% 84,046 100%
======= === ======= === ======= ===
Less:
Undisbursed loan funds...... 121 452 943
Unearned loan fees, net..... 132 148 91
Allowance for loan losses... 319 319 319
------- ------- -------
Total loans receivable,
net...................... $72,278 $80,956 $82,693
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
One- to Four-Family Residential Loans. The primary lending activity of
Sentinel Federal is the origination of mortgage loans to enable borrowers to
purchase, refinance or construct single family homes. Management believes that
the policy of focusing on one- to four-family residential mortgage loans has
been successful in contributing to interest income while keeping delinquencies
and losses to a minimum. At June 30, 1996, approximately $75.9 million, or
91.8%, of Sentinel Federal's total loan portfolio consisted of loans secured
by one-to four-family residential real estate.
Sentinel Federal presently originates both fixed and adjustable rate
mortgage loans secured by one- to four-family properties with loan terms of 15
to 30 years. In 1985, Sentinel Federal began originating adjustable rate
mortgage ("ARM") loans indexed to various indices. Until 1989 Sentinel Federal
used primarily the monthly media cost of funds index. Since 1989, all ARMs
have been indexed to the U.S. Treasury Index, with margins ranging from 250%
to 300% over the index, repricing annually with no negative amortization.
Sentinel Federal also originates adjustable rate loans that adjust after
either the third or fifth year and thereafter adjust annually. Minimum and
maximum lifetime rates are established based on competitive factors at the
time of origination and collateral type. Borrower demand for ARMs versus fixed
rate mortgage loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the
expectations of changes in the level of interest rates and the difference
between the interest rates and loan fees offered for fixed rate mortgage loans
and the first year interest rates and loan fees for ARMs. The relative amount
of fixed rate mortgage loans and ARMs that can be originated at any time is
largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment.
Additionally, all of Sentinel Federal's adjustable rate loans using the U.S.
Treasury one year constant maturity index contain provisions allowing
conversion of the loan to a fixed rate loan, subject to certain qualifying
conditions. While this particular feature permits the borrower to convert to a
fixed rate loan, Sentinel Federal has not experienced significant prepayment
as a result of this option. Converted loans that do not meet Sentinel
Federal's yield requirements are sold to the FHLMC to limit interest rate
risk.
126
<PAGE>
During the year ended June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal's total mortgage loan
originations were $29.3 million, of which 18.2% were subject to periodic
interest rate adjustments and 81.8% were long-term, fixed rate loans. See "--
Loan Originations, Sales and Purchases."
Sentinel Federal's long-term, fixed-rate loans are originated with terms of
15 to 30 years, amortized on a monthly basis with principal and interest due
each month. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal had $38.4 million of long-term,
fixed-rate mortgage loans in its portfolio, or 46.4% of its total loan
portfolio.
Sentinel Federal also engages in mortgage banking activities. These
activities include the origination and sale of whole loans to investors and
the FHLMC. Loans are sold to generate fee income and maintain market share.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996, Sentinel Federal
sold $6.6 million, $3.6 million and $11.5 million of originated loans,
respectively.
Sentinel Federal offers ARMs at market rates that may be below the fully
indexed rate. At June 30, 1996, the initial interest rate being offered on
Sentinel Federal's ARMs ranged from 5.25% to 5.75% per annum. The periodic
interest rate cap (the maximum amount by which the interest rate may be
increased or decreased in a given period) on Sentinel Federal's ARMs is
generally 200 basis points annually and the lifetime interest rate cap is
generally 600 basis points over the initial interest rate of the loan.
Sentinel Federal underwrites ARMs based on the borrower's ability to repay the
loan using the first year adjusted rate to qualify the borrower or second year
adjusted rate to qualify the borrower at fully indexed rates based on various
underwriting criteria. As a result, the potential for delinquencies and
defaults on ARMs is lessened.
Sentinel Federal's fixed rate loan portfolio contains due-on-sale clauses
providing that Sentinel Federal may declare the unpaid amount due and payable
upon the sale of the property securing the loan. Sentinel Federal enforces
these due-on-sale clauses to the extent permitted by law. Thus, average loan
maturity (which Sentinel Federal estimates is between eight to ten years) is a
function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in
the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates
payable on outstanding loans.
Sentinel Federal requires title insurance insuring the status of its lien on
all of the real estate secured loans, and also requires that fire and extended
coverage casualty insurance (and, if appropriate, flood insurance) be
maintained in an amount at least equal to the lesser of the loan balance or
the replacement cost of the improvements. Where the value of the land,
exclusive of the improvements, exceeds the amount of the loan on the real
estate, Sentinel Federal may make exceptions to its property insurance
requirements.
Multi-Family Loans. In addition to originating single-family residential
real estate loans, Sentinel Federal also originates loans secured by multi-
family dwelling units (five or more units). At June 30, 1996, Sentinel
Federal's total multi-family loans were $2.7 million, or 3.2% of Sentinel
Federal's total loan portfolio, secured by multi-family dwelling units located
in Sentinel Federal's primary market area. The loan-to-value and equity
standards imposed by Sentinel Federal are determined on a case-by-case basis.
Loans secured by multi-family residential real estate are generally larger and
involve a greater degree of risk than single-family residential mortgage
loans.
Certain types of lending are considered to be more risk adverse than others
and, in determination of an institution's capital ratios, are accorded a lower
risk weight. The effect of applying this lower rate of risk is to reduce the
capital requirements for the amount of the particular loan. For instance, a
loan with a 100% risk weight requires that the institution satisfy the full
capital requirement for such lending; whereas a loan with a 50% risk weight
needs only one-half the capital of the 100% weighted loan. Since the lower
risk weights are accorded to more secure lending, this weighting encourages
safe, non-speculative lending.
Multi-family housing loans are normally assigned a 100% risk weight by
federal regulations. However, OTS regulations assign a 50% risk weight to
"qualifying multi-family mortgage loans," i.e., loans with an existing
property having five to 36 dwelling units with an initial loan-to-value ratio
of not more than 80% where an average annual occupancy rate of 80% or more has
existed for at least one year. See "Regulation--Federal Regulation of Savings
Associations--Capital Requirements."
127
<PAGE>
Multi-family lending is generally considered to involve a higher degree of
risk than permanent residential one- to-four family lending. Such lending
typically involves large loan balances concentrated in a single borrower or
groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment experience on loans
secured by income-producing properties is typically dependent on the
successful operation of the related real estate project and thus may be
subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions in the real estate market or
in the economy generally. Sentinel Federal generally attempts to mitigate the
risks associated with multi-family lending by, among other things, lending on
collateral located in its market area and generally to individuals who reside
in its market.
Construction Loans. Sentinel Federal originates residential construction
mortgage loans to residential owner-occupants (custom construction loans) and
to local contractors building residential properties for resale (speculative
construction loans). At June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal had construction loans
of $1.6 million outstanding.
Construction lending is generally considered to involve a higher degree of
credit risk than long-term financing of residential properties. An
institution's risk of loss on a construction loan is dependent largely upon
the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property's value at completion of
construction or the borrower's ability to absorb additional expenses in the
event that costs to complete construction are in excess of the initial cost
estimate. If the estimate of construction cost and the marketability of the
property upon completion of the project prove to be inaccurate, the
institution may be compelled to advance additional funds to complete the
structure. If estimated costs or value proves to be inaccurate, the
institution may be confronted with a property as collateral which is
insufficient to assure full repayment.
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Sentinel Federal had $2.6 million in
commercial real estate loans at June 30, 1996. Sentinel Federal's commercial
loan activity is limited in scope and activity at this time.
Loan Maturity and Repricing. The following table sets forth certain
information at June 30, 1996 regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing or
repricing in Sentinel Federal's portfolio based on their contractual terms to
maturity, but does not include scheduled payments or potential prepayments.
Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated
maturity, and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less. Loan
balances do not include undisbursed loan proceeds, unearned discounts,
unearned income and allowance for loan losses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AFTER 3 YEARS
WITHIN AFTER ONE YEAR THROUGH AFTER 5 YEARS
ONE YEAR THROUGH 3 YEARS 5 YEARS THROUGH 10 YEARS BEYOND 10 YEARS TOTAL
-------- --------------- ------------- ---------------- --------------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate mortgage.... $ 2 $1,622 $ 701 $5,343 $69,751 $77,419
Commercial real estate.. -- 500 -- 1,312 764 2,576
Construction............ 893 -- -- -- 734 1,627
Automobile.............. 3 35 100 -- -- 138
Savings account loans... 220 91 24 -- -- 335
Other................... 6 126 390 1,115 314 1,951
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
Total loans........... $1,124 $2,374 $1,215 $7,770 $71,563 $84,046
====== ====== ====== ====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
128
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans due after June
30, 1997 which have fixed interest rates and have floating or adjustable
interest rates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FLOATING--OR
FIXED-RATES ADJUSTABLE-RATES
----------- ----------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Real estate mortgage............................ $33,986 $43,431
Commercial real estate.......................... 1,939 637
Construction.................................... 140 594
Automobile...................................... 135 --
Savings account loans........................... 115 --
Other........................................... 1,945 --
------- -------
Total......................................... $38,260 $44,662
======= =======
</TABLE>
Loan Solicitation and Processing. Sentinel Federal's primary sources of
loans include referrals, brokers, contractors, repeat business from existing
and former borrowers.
Once an application for a mortgage loan is received by Sentinel Federal, a
credit and property analysis is completed, including obtaining a credit report
from reporting agencies, verification of income and deposits, and asset and
liabilities. An appraisal of the property offered as collateral is undertaken
by a fee appraiser approved by Sentinel Federal and licensed or certified by
the State of Missouri.
The completed loan file is then submitted for underwriting. Once
underwritten, the loan is submitted to the appropriate committee for review
and approval. Single-family residential loans up to $250,000 may be approved
by the Loan Committee. Approval of the Board of Directors is required for
Sentinel Federal to make a loan in excess of $250,000.
Loan Originations, Sales and Purchases. Sentinel Federal originates fixed-
and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans that meet or exceed the
applicable underwriting requirements of Sentinel Federal or FNMA and FHLMC. In
addition, as a portfolio lender, Sentinel Federal also originates fixed and
adjustable-rate loans that are underwritten to Sentinel Federal's standards,
but may not immediately qualify for sale in the secondary market.
The following table shows total loans originated, purchased, sold and repaid
during the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
---------------------------
1994 1995 1996
-------- ------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total loans at beginning of period............ $ 80,563 $72,850 $ 81,875
Loans originated:
Single-family residential................... 18,364 19,121 28,120
Multi-family residential and commercial real
estate..................................... -- 1,491 500
Other loans................................. 129 578 676
-------- ------- --------
Total loans originated.................... 18,493 21,190 29,296
Loans sold.................................... (6,518) (3,636) (11,482)
Loan principal repayments..................... (19,688) (8,529) (15,643)
-------- ------- --------
Net loan activity............................. (7,713) 9,025 2,171
-------- ------- --------
Total loans at end of period.............. $ 72,850 $81,875 $ 84,046
======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
Loan Commitments. Sentinel Federal issues commitments for fixed- and
adjustable-rate single-family residential mortgage loans conditioned upon the
occurrence of certain events. Such commitments are made on
129
<PAGE>
specified terms and conditions and are honored for up to 180 days from
approval. Sentinel Federal had outstanding net loan commitments of
approximately $1.2 million at June 30, 1996.
Loan Origination and Other Fees. Sentinel Federal, in most instances,
receives loan origination fees which are a percentage of the principal amount
of the mortgage loan charged to the borrower for funding the loan. The amount
of points charged by Sentinel Federal varies, though the range generally is
between one and two and one half points. Current accounting standards require
fees received (net of certain loan origination costs) for originating loans to
be deferred and amortized into interest income over the contractual life of
the loan. Net deferred fees associated with loans that are sold are recognized
as an adjustment to gain or loss at the time of sale. On loans not sold,
Sentinel Federal had $91,400 of net deferred loan fees at June 30, 1996.
Delinquencies. A report containing delinquencies of all loans is reviewed
monthly by the Board of Directors of Sentinel Federal. Procedures taken with
respect to delinquent loans differ depending on the particular circumstances
of the loan. Sentinel Federal's procedures provide that when a loan becomes
delinquent, the borrower is contacted, usually by phone, within 15 to 30 days.
When the loan is over 30 days delinquent, the borrower is contacted in
writing. Typically, Sentinel Federal will initiate foreclosure action against
the borrower when principal and interest become 90 days or more delinquent. In
any event, interest income is reduced by the full amount of accrued and
uncollected interest on most loans once they become 90 days delinquent, go
into foreclosure or are otherwise determined to be uncollectible. An allowance
for loss is established when, in the opinion of management, the net fair value
of the property collateralizing the loan is less than the outstanding
principal and the collectibility of the loan's principal becomes uncertain. In
some instances, the collateral underlying residential and commercial real
estate loans in Sentinel Federal's portfolio has been insufficient to cover
the book value and cost of selling the property. As of June 30, 1996, Sentinel
Federal had $168,000 of loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis (i.e., loans
upon which management believes the future collectibility of interest is
uncertain).
The following table sets forth information with respect to Sentinel
Federal's nonperforming assets at the dates indicated. At the dates shown,
Sentinel Federal had no restructured loans within the meaning of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 15, Accounting by Debtors and Creditors of
Troubled Debt Restructurings.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30,
----------------------------------
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
------ ----- ----- ----- -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis:
Real estate--Residential................ $ 657 $ 508 $ 243 $ 14 $ 168
------ ----- ----- ----- -----
Total................................. 657 508 243 14 168
Accruing loans which are contractually
past due 90 days or more:
Real estate--Residential................ 82 -- 28 121 47
------ ----- ----- ----- -----
Total................................. 82 -- 28 121 47
------ ----- ----- ----- -----
Total of nonaccrual and 90 days past due
loans.................................... 739 508 271 135 215
Real estate owned (net)................... 741 104 -- -- --
------ ----- ----- ----- -----
Total nonperforming assets............ $1,480 $ 612 $ 271 $ 135 $ 215
====== ===== ===== ===== =====
Total loans delinquent 90 days or more to
net loans................................ 0.77% 0.64% 0.14% 0.17% 0.26%
Total loans delinquent 90 days or more to
total assets............................. 0.46% 0.32% 0.07% 0.08% 0.15%
Total nonperforming assets to total as-
sets..................................... 0.92% 0.39% 0.18% 0.08% 0.12%
</TABLE>
Interest income that would have been recorded for the year ended June 30,
1996 had nonaccruing loans been current in accordance with their original
terms amounted to approximately $168,100. The amount of interest included in
the results of operations on such loans for the year ended June 30, 1996
amounted to approximately $6,300.
130
<PAGE>
Asset Classifications. The OTS has adopted regulations that require each
insured savings association to review and classify its assets on a regular
basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions,
OTS examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate,
require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem
assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. Substandard assets must have one or
more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that
the insured institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Doubtful assets have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the
additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation
in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values
questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified
loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance
as an asset of the institution is not warranted. Assets classified as
substandard or doubtful require the institution to establish general
allowances for these asset losses. If an asset or portion thereof is
classified loss, the insured institution must either establish specific
allowances for the portion of the asset classified as loss in the amount of
100% of the portion of the asset classified loss or charge off such amount. A
portion of general loss allowances established to cover possible losses
related to assets classified substandard or doubtful may be included in
determining an institution's regulatory capital, while specific valuation
allowances for loan losses generally do not qualify as regulatory capital.
At June 30, 1995 and 1996 the aggregate amounts of Sentinel Federal's
classified assets, and of Sentinel Federal's general and specific loss
allowances and charge-offs for the period then ended, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30,
-----------
1995 1996
----- -----
(IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Doubtful........................................................ $ -- $ --
Substandard assets.............................................. -- --
Special mention................................................. 58 --
General loss allowances......................................... 318 319
Specific loss allowances........................................ -- --
</TABLE>
Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired by Sentinel Federal as a result of
foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate
owned until it is sold. When property is acquired it is recorded at the lower
of the cost or fair value. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal had no
properties classified as real estate owned.
Allowance for Loan Losses. It is management's policy to maintain adequate
allowances for estimated losses on known and inherent risks in the loan
portfolio. Generally, the allowances are based on, among other things, the
size and composition of the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience,
evaluation of economic conditions in general and in various sectors of
Sentinel Federal's customer base, detailed analysis of individual loans for
which collectibility may not be assured and determination of the existence and
realizable value of the collateral and guarantees securing the loan.
Sentinel Federal's management evaluates the need to establish an allowance
for loan losses based on a review of all loans for which full collectibility
may not be reasonably assured and considers, among other matters, the
estimated market value of the underlying collateral of problem loans, prior
loss experience, economic conditions and overall portfolio quality. These
provisions for losses are charged against income in the year they are
established.
Sentinel Federal believes it has established its existing allowance for loan
losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") as
of June 30, 1996. However, there can be no assurance that the loan portfolio
in the future will not require Sentinel Federal to increase its allowance for
loan losses, thereby adversely affecting the financial condition and earnings.
131
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan
losses by loan category at the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30,
-----------------------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
--------------- --------------- ---------------
% OF % OF % OF
LOANS IN LOANS IN LOANS IN
EACH EACH EACH
CATAGORY CATAGORY CATAGORY
TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL
AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS
------ -------- ------ -------- ------ --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate -- mortgage:
Residential.................. $ 51 98% $ 38 94% $ 37 92%
Commercial................... 17 1 49 3 52 3
Construction................. 1 -- 12 1 16 2
Consumer..................... 2 1 5 2 10 3
Unallocated.................. 247 N/A 214 N/A 204 N/A
---- --- ---- --- ---- ---
Total allowance for loan
losses.................... $318 100% $318 100% $319 100%
==== === ==== ====
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth an analysis of Sentinel Federal's gross
allowance for possible loan losses for the periods indicated. Where specific
loan loss reserves have been established, any difference between the loss
reserve and the amount of loss realized has been charged or credited to
current income.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
---------------------------------
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance at beginning of period........... $ 155 $ 147 $ 278 $ 318 $ 318
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Provision for loan losses.................. 27 154 42 -- --
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Recoveries:
Residential real estate.................... -- -- -- -- 1
Commercial real estate..................... -- -- -- -- --
Consumer................................... -- -- -- -- --
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total recoveries....................... -- -- -- -- 1
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Charge-offs:
Residential real estate.................. 27 23 2 -- --
Commercial real estate................... -- -- -- -- --
Construction............................. -- -- -- -- --
Consumer................................. 8 -- -- -- --
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total charge-offs...................... 35 23 2 -- --
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Net charge-offs........................ 35 23 2 -- (1)
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Balance at end of period............... $ 147 $ 278 $ 318 $ 318 $ 319
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
Ratio of allowance to total loans
outstanding at the end of the period...... 0.15% 0.15% 0.44% 0.39% 0.39%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans
outstanding during the period............. 0.08 0.04 -- -- --
</TABLE>
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
Federally chartered savings institutions have authority to invest in various
types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of
various federal agencies and of state and municipal governments, deposits at
the FHLB, certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions, certain
bankers' acceptances and federal
132
<PAGE>
funds. Subject to various restrictions, such savings institutions may also
invest a portion of their assets in commercial paper, corporate debt
securities and mutual funds, the assets of which conform to the investments
that federally chartered savings institutions are otherwise authorized to make
directly. Savings institutions are also required to maintain minimum levels of
liquid assets which vary from time to time. See "Regulation of Sentinel
Financial Corporation and Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association of
Kansas City--Federal Regulation of Savings Associations--Federal Home Loan
Bank System." Sentinel Federal may decide to increase its liquidity above the
required levels depending upon the availability of funds and comparative
yields on investments in relation to return on loans.
The Board of Directors of Sentinel Federal sets the investment policy of
Sentinel Federal. This policy dictates that investments will be made with the
intent of holding them to maturity and will be made based on the safety of the
principal amount, liquidity requirements of Sentinel Federal and the return on
the investments. Sentinel Federal's policy does not permit investment in non-
investment grade bonds. It permits investment in various types of liquid
assets permissible under OTS regulation, which include U.S. Treasury
obligations, securities of various federal agencies, certain certificates of
deposits of insured banks, repurchase agreements and federal funds.
To supplement lending activities in periods of deposit growth, declining
loan demand or significant prepayments, Sentinel Federal has invested in
residential mortgage-related securities. Although such securities are held for
investment, they can serve as collateral for borrowings and, through
repayments, as a source of liquidity. For information regarding the carrying
and market values of Sentinel Federal's mortgage-related securities portfolio,
see Note 4 of "Financial Statements of Sentinel Financial Corporation--
Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditors' Report for the
years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996." Sentinel Federal generally invests
in mortgaged-backed securities guaranteed by the FHLMC and the FNMA.
As of June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal's portfolio included $51.5 million of
mortgage-related securities purchased as investments to supplement Sentinel
Federal's mortgage lending activities. All mortgage-related securities are
comprised of adjustable-rates. As of June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal owned no
collateralized mortgage obligations.
Sentinel Federal also invests in government bonds and agency securities
insured by a government-sponsored agency. Since 1989, Sentinel Federal has
focused its investment activity on the purchase of short-term or adjustable-
rate instruments. Management intends to continue to concentrate investments in
adjustable rate products subject to adequate liquidity and investment margins.
As a result of this activity, as of June 30, 1996, over 97.5% of Sentinel
Federal's mortgage-related investments, including portfolio single-family
loans, were adjustable in nature.
Sentinel Federal's investment portfolio is an important component of
Sentinel Federal's overall operations. The portfolio is segregated by the
intended holding period of a particular investment in accordance with Sentinel
Federal's policy, GAAP and applicable federal regulations. As of June 30,
1996, all of Sentinel Federal's mortgage-related portfolio were classified as
held to maturity. Sentinel Federal has also invested from time to time in
assets classified as available for sale. Such securities are generally
adjustable rate in nature or have relatively short maturities. All investments
are extensively monitored on a regular basis with current market valuation
reviewed at least quarterly. By internal policy, Sentinel Federal limits
assets available for sale to 15% of total assets and a stop loss limit of
$250,000 applies to all assets in this category.
Investment decisions are approved by the Asset Liability Committee of the
Board of Directors of Sentinel Federal which meets on a regular basis. The
Asset Liability Committee acts within policies established by the Board of
Directors of Sentinel Federal.
133
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth Sentinel Federal's investment securities
portfolio at carrying value at the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30,
-----------------------------------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
CARRYING PERCENT OF CARRYING PERCENT OF CARRYING PERCENT OF
VALUE(1) PORTFOLIO VALUE(1) PORTFOLIO VALUE(1) PORTFOLIO
-------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Held to maturity:
FNMA.................. $45,648 59.55% $44,159 60.89% $32,838 60.13%
FHLMC................. 27,331 35.66 24,714 34.08 18,629 34.11
U.S. Government
treasury and
obligations of U.S.
Government agencies.. 2,494 3.25 2,498 3.44 2,000 3.66
Other................. 117 0.15 67 0.09 53 0.10
------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------
Total held to matu-
rity............... 75,590 98.62 71,439 98.51 53,520 98.00
Available for sale:
U.S. Government trea-
sury and obligations
of U.S. Government
agencies............. 1,058 1.38 1,083 1.49 1,093 2.00
Other................. 3 -- -- -- -- --
------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------
Total available for
sale............... 1,061 1.38 1,083 1.49 1,093 2.00
------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------
Total............. $76,651 100.00% $72,522 100.00% $54,613 100.00%
======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ======
</TABLE>
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the carrying value,
weighted average yields and maturities or periods to repricing of Sentinel
Federal's investment and mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT DUE OR REPRICING WITHIN:
-----------------------------------
OVER ONE TO
ONE YEAR OR LESS FIVE YEARS
----------------- -----------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
CARRYING AVERAGE CARRYING AVERAGE
VALUE YIELD VALUE YIELD
-------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Held to maturity:
FNMA..................................... $32,838 6.95% $ -- -- %
FHLMC.................................... 17,352 6.86 1,277 5.23
U.S. Government treasury and obligations
of U.S. Government agencies............. 2,000 4.78 -- --
Other.................................... 53 3.17 -- --
------- ---- ------ ----
Total held to maturity................. 52,243 6.84 1,277 5.23
Available for sale:
U.S. Government treasury and obligations
of U.S. Government agencies............. 1,093 4.58 -- --
------- ---- ------ ----
Total available for sale............... 1,093 4.58 -- --
------- ---- ------ ----
Total................................ $53,336 6.79% $1,277 5.23%
======= ==== ====== ====
</TABLE>
DEPOSIT ACTIVITIES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS
General. Sentinel Federal's primary sources of funds are deposits, FHLB
advances, proceeds from principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-
related securities and proceeds from loan sales. Deposits and loan repayments
are the major source of Sentinel Federal's funds for lending and other
investment purposes. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds,
while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly
influenced by general level of interest rates and money market conditions.
Borrowings may be
134
<PAGE>
used on a short-term basis to compensate for reductions in the availability of
funds from other sources, or on a longer term basis for interest rate risk
management.
Deposit Accounts. Sentinel Federal's goal for savings activity is to retain
its current deposit base while attempting to reduce the overall cost of the
current deposit base. Any deposit growth is limited to not more than interest
credited or the total balance sheet projection in Sentinel Federal's original
Capital Plan and the amount of interest credited as required under the
Supervisory Agreement, each of which are discussed above. See "--General."
Sentinel Federal offers a variety of deposit accounts having a range of
interest rates and terms. Sentinel Federal's deposits consist of passbook,
money market, and certificate accounts. The flow of deposits is influenced
significantly by general economic conditions, changes in the money market and
prevailing interest rates, and competition. The interest rates Sentinel
Federal pays on its deposits is determined at least weekly and is based on
market conditions. Sentinel Federal relies primarily on customer service and
long-standing relationships with customers to attract and retain these
deposits. Individual certificate accounts in excess of $100,000 are not
actively solicited by Sentinel Federal or by any agent or broker acting on
behalf of Sentinel Federal nor does Sentinel Federal pay substantially higher
interest rates on such accounts.
In the unlikely event Sentinel Federal is liquidated, depositors will be
entitled to full payment of their deposit accounts prior to any payment being
made to the shareholders. The majority of Sentinel Federal's depositors are
residents of the State of Missouri.
The following table sets forth information concerning Sentinel Federal's
time deposits and other interest-bearing deposits at June 30, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE
INTEREST MINIMUM OF TOTAL
RATE TERM CATEGORY AMOUNT BALANCE DEPOSITS
-------- ---- -------- ----------- -------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<C> <C> <S> <C> <C> <C>
2.50% None NOW Accounts $ 100 $ 2,985 2.42%
4.40 None Money Market and Super
NOW Accounts 1,000 19,051 15.46
2.72 None Statement, Christmas
Club, Passbook 50, 20, 50 8,817 7.15
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
2.72 90 Days 90-day passbook 500 -- --
5.14 4-6 Months Fixed term, fixed rate 500 10,609 8.61
5.30 7-12 Months Fixed term, fixed rate 500 19,443 15.77
5.30 13-24 Months Fixed term, fixed rate 500 10,967 8.90
5.87 25-48 Months Fixed term, fixed rate 500 20,121 16.33
5.63 49-120 Months Fixed term, fixed rate 500 31,261 25.36
-------- ------
$123,253 100.00%
======== ======
</TABLE>
As of June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal did not have any "jumbo" certificates
of deposit (i.e., certificate of deposits with minimum balances of $100,000
and negotiable interest rates).
135
<PAGE>
Deposit Flow. The following table sets forth the balances of savings
deposits in the various types of savings accounts offered by Sentinel Federal
at the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
---------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF OF INCREASE OF INCREASE
AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL (DECREASE) AMOUNT TOTAL (DECREASE)
-------- ------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- ------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Non-interest-bearing.... $ -- --% $ -- --% $ -- $ -- --% $ --
NOW checking............ 3,178 2.42 3,236 2.56 58 2,985 2.42 (251)
Regular savings ac-
counts................. 11,751 8.66 10,395 8.22 (1,356) 8,817 7.15 (1,578)
Money market deposit.... 20,385 15.50 18,564 14.68 (1,821) 19,051 15.46 487
Fixed-rate certificates
which mature in the
year ending:
Within 1 year.......... 47,548 36.43 43,807 34.65 (3,741) 54,495 44.21 10,688
After 1 year, but
within 2 years........ 18,691 14.21 23,759 18.79 5,068 20,219 16.40 (3,540)
After 2 years, but
within 5 years........ 29,480 22.42 22,760 18.00 (6,720) 14,653 11.89 (8,107)
Certificates maturing
thereafter............ 471 0.36 3,919 3.10 3,448 3,033 2.46 (886)
-------- ------ -------- ------ ------- -------- ------ -------
Total.................. $131,504 100.00% $126,440 100.00% $(5,064) $123,253 100.00% $(3,187)
======== ====== ======== ====== ======= ======== ====== ======= ===
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth the savings activities of Sentinel Federal
for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------------
1994 1995 1996
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Beginning balance................................. $138,585 $131,504 $126,440
-------- -------- --------
Net (decrease) before interest credited........... (13,219) (10,189) (8,275)
Interest credited................................. 6,138 5,125 5,088
-------- -------- --------
Net (decrease) in savings deposits................ (7,081) (5,064) (3,187)
-------- -------- --------
Ending balance.................................... $131,504 $126,440 $123,253
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
Time Deposits by Rates. The following table sets forth the time deposits in
Sentinel Federal classified by rates as of the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30,
-----------------------
1994 1995 1996
------- ------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
5.00% and below........................................ $56,679 $22,064 $ 6,256
5.01-- 6.00%........................................... 10,585 25,583 49,134
6.01-- 7.00%........................................... 12,032 32,519 26,750
7.01--11.00%........................................... 16,848 14,078 10,260
11.01--13.00%........................................... 46 -- --
------- ------- -------
Total................................................. $96,190 $94,244 $92,400
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time deposits at
June 30, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT DUE
-----------------------------------------------
LESS THAN 1-2 2-3 3-4 AFTER
ONE YEAR YEARS YEARS YEARS 4 YEARS TOTAL
--------- ------- ------ ------ ------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
5.00% and below................ $ 5,677 $ 362 $ 217 $ -- $ -- $ 6,256
5.01-- 6.00%................... 32,454 9,663 4,858 937 1,222 49,134
6.01-- 7.00%................... 13,835 6,426 820 2,460 3,209 26,750
7.01--11.00%................... 2,529 3,768 2,537 619 807 10,260
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ -------
Total......................... $54,495 $20,219 $8,432 $4,016 $5,238 $92,400
======= ======= ====== ====== ====== =======
</TABLE>
136
<PAGE>
Borrowings. Savings deposits are the primary source of funds for Sentinel
Federal's lending and investment activities and for its general business
purposes. Sentinel Federal has in the past, however, relied upon advances from
the FHLB-Des Moines to supplement its supply of lendable funds and to meet
deposit withdrawal requirements. The FHLB-Des Moines has served as one of
Sentinel Federal's primary borrowing sources. Advances from the FHLB-Des
Moines are typically secured by Sentinel Federal's mortgage-backed securities
which is held by Sentinel Federal. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal had $7.0
million in advances from the FHLB-Des Moines.
The FHLB functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for savings
and loan associations and certain other member financial institutions. As a
member, Sentinel Federal is required to own capital stock in the FHLB and is
authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of
its mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are
obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States) provided certain
standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made
pursuant to several different programs. Each credit program has its own
interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations
on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an
institution's net worth or on the FHLB's assessment of the institution's
creditworthiness. The FHLB-Des Moines determines specific lines of credit for
each member institution.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding borrowed funds
for the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT OR FOR THE YEAR
ENDED JUNE 30,
-------------------------
1994 1995 1996
------- ------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
FHLB-Des Moines advances:
Average balance outstanding........................ $ 9,471 $16,150 $13,483
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end during
the period........................................ 11,000 21,850 21,450
Balance outstanding at end of period............... 10,450 21,850 7,000
Weighted average interest rate during the period... 6.77% 6.48% 5.44%
Weighted average interest rate at the end of peri-
od................................................ 5.42 6.26 6.11
</TABLE>
SUBSIDIARIES
Sentinel Insurance Agency, Inc. ("Sentinel Insurance") is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Sentinel Federal. As of June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal's equity
investment in the subsidiary was approximately $5,000. Currently, the only
activity of Sentinel Insurance is the sale of tax deferred annuities. Sentinel
Insurance sold its remaining book of property and casualty insurance during
fiscal 1993, which represented an insignificant portion of its insurance
operations. For the years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996 sales of
annuities resulted in additional income from insurance commissions of
$163,000, $101,000 and $39,000, respectively.
Claywood Financial Services, Sentinel Federal's other wholly-owned
subsidiary, is inactive.
COMPETITION
Sentinel Federal competes for both loans and deposits. The Kansas City area
has a high density of financial institutions, some of which are larger and
have greater financial resources than Sentinel Federal, and all of which are
competitors of Sentinel Federal to varying degrees. Sentinel Federal faces
significant competition both in making mortgage loans and attracting deposits.
Sentinel Federal's competition for loans comes principally from savings and
loan associations, savings banks, mortgage banking companies, insurance
companies and commercial banks. Its most direct competition for deposits has
historically come from savings and loan associations, commercial banks, and
credit unions. Sentinel Federal faces additional competition for deposits from
short-term money market funds and other corporate and government securities.
PERSONNEL
As of June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal had 32 full-time employees and 1 part-
time employees. Sentinel Federal believes that employees play a vital role in
the success of a service company and that Sentinel Federal's relationship with
its employees is good. The employees are not represented by a collective
bargaining unit.
137
<PAGE>
PROPERTIES OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Sentinel Federal's main office is owned by Sentinel Federal and is located
at 1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Sentinel Federal has one
branch office in North Kansas City, Missouri, which is leased. The lease
expires on December 31, 1997. At June 30, 1996, the net book value of Sentinel
Federals property, fixtures, furniture and equipment was $363,000.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND
SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY
Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving Sentinel
or Sentinel Federal as a defendant, such as claims to enforce liens,
condemnation proceedings on properties in which Sentinel or Sentinel Federal
holds security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real
property loans and other issued incident to Sentinel Federal's business. In
the opinion of management of Sentinel and Sentinel and Sentinel Federal's
legal counsel, no significant loss is expected from any of such pending claims
or lawsuits.
138
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND
SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY
GENERAL
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and
results of operations of Sentinel. The information contained in this section
should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of
Sentinel and the accompanying notes contained in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
OPERATING STRATEGY
The primary goal of management is to enhance operations through increased
profitability, while minimizing risk factors. Sentinel's results of operations
are dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the difference
between the income earned on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and
investments, and the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities, consisting of
deposits and borrowings. Sentinel's net income is also affected by, among
other items, fee income, insurance commissions, provisions for loan losses and
operating expenses. Sentinel's results of operations are also significantly
impacted by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes
in market interest rates, government policies and local housing activity.
In guiding the operations of Sentinel, Sentinel's management has implemented
various strategies designed to continue its profitability while maintaining
the safety and soundness of Sentinel. These strategies include:
(i) emphasizing increased production of one- to four-family loans; (ii)
controlling operating expenses; and (iii) improving customer service.
Historically, Sentinel has been predominately a one- to four-family lender. As
such, it has developed expertise in mortgage loan underwriting and
origination. Sentinel has established methods to expand its loan origination
through contacts with realtors, and past and present customers. Sentinel also
uses advertising and community involvement to gain exposure within the
communities it operates. Sentinel emphasizes the origination of adjustable
rate mortgage ("ARM") and fixed rate loans. Loan originations are primarily
concentrated in Sentinel's local community.
At June 30, 1996, Sentinel's ratio of non-performing assets to total assets
was 0.12%. Sentinel continues to remain focused on maintaining acceptable
asset quality through sound underwriting and effective collection procedures.
Managing the Balance Sheet. Historically, Sentinel has sought to maintain a
stable growth pattern. Since 1989, and the implementation of the Supervisory
Agreement, growth has been significantly restricted. As a result, Sentinel
incurred shrinkage of total assets between June 30, 1988 and June 30, 1996 of
15.5%. This lack of asset growth coupled with improved earnings and the
January 7, 1994 stock conversion has allowed total capital to increase from
1.51% to 7.73% of total assets as of June 30, 1996.
Controlling Operating Expenses. Sentinel monitors its operating expenses and
seeks to control them while maintaining the necessary personnel to service its
customers through its two office locations. Historically, operating expenses
have been kept at or below 1.70% of average assets. During the year ended June
30, 1996, non-interest expenses averaged 2.19% of average assets.
Managing Interest-Rate Risk. In order to reduce the impact of fluctuating
interest rates on Sentinel's net interest income, Sentinel's management
utilizes several techniques. These techniques include (i) emphasizing the
origination of adjustable rate loans; (ii) maintaining a short-term investment
portfolio; (iii) investing primarily in adjustable rate mortgage- related
securities; and (iv) lengthening deposit maturities when warranted.
This business strategy is consistent with an operating philosophy that
includes: (i) increasing lending department production and efficiency; (ii)
increasing market share; (iii) and improving customer services; and (iv)
improving Sentinel's retail marketing strategy.
139
<PAGE>
COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT JUNE 30, 1995 AND 1996
Total assets decreased $18.1 million from $161.9 million at June 30, 1995 to
$143.8 million at June 30, 1996. Sentinel's asset size primarily reflects
management's focus on mortgage loan production and managed reduction in the
mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Sentinel's net loans receivable
increased $1.7 million from $81.0 million at June 30, 1995 to $82.7 million at
June 30, 1996. During this period, mortgage-related securities decreased $17.4
million.
Total deposits declined moderately during fiscal year 1996 as compared to
June 30, 1995. At June 30, 1995, total deposits were $126.4 million, compared
to $123.3 million at June 30, 1996. This reduction was primarily the result of
management's efforts to reduce the overall cost of deposits, and capital
growth during the period. During fiscal 1996, total account withdrawals
exceeded deposits by $8.3 million. Approximately $5.1 million of interest was
credited to accounts resulting in a net decrease of $3.2 million in total
deposits. Advance balances from the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") decreased
from $21.9 million at June 30, 1995 to $7.0 million at June 30, 1996.
COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1995 AND
1996
General. Net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 was $928,000,
compared with $630,000 for fiscal year 1995, representing a 47.3% increase.
The increase was primarily attributable to an income tax benefit relating to
the treatment of net operating loss carry forwards recorded during the third
quarter. Non-interest expense increased $749,000, or 28.7%, during the year
ended June 30, 1996. The increase in non-interest expense was the result of
several unusual items, including merger-related expenses, litigation expenses,
and the recording of a loss reflecting the difference between the amortized
cost and the current fair market value of Sentinel's downtown office building.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $399,000 to $3.5 million
for the year ended June 30, 1996, compared with $3.1 million for fiscal 1995.
The increase in net interest income reflects an increase in Sentinel's net
interest margin from 1.98% for the year ended June 30, 1995 to 2.28% for the
year ended June 30, 1996. The increase in net interest income is primarily the
result of two areas of operations. First, yields on adjustable-rate loans and
mortgage-related securities repriced upward during the period. Second, a
portion of Sentinel's higher costing longer-term certificates of deposits
matured while the overall deposit mix shifted away from long-term certificates
to intermediate- and shorter-term certificates of deposit, slowing the overall
rise in interest expense.
Interest Income. Interest income for the year ended June 30, 1996 was $11.0
million, compared with $10.4 million for fiscal 1995, representing an increase
of $600,000, or 5.6%. The average yield on interest-earning assets increased
from 6.69% for the year ended June 30, 1995 to 7.23% for fiscal year 1996. Net
loans receivable increased $1.7 million for the year ended June 30, 1996 as a
result of higher origination levels. Portfolio loan repayments increased from
$8.5 million during fiscal year ended June 30, 1995 to $16.0 million during
the year ended June 30, 1996. During these same periods, total loan production
increased significantly, while portfolio loan production rose slightly from
$17.6 million during the year ended June 30, 1995 to $17.8 million for the
year ended June 30, 1996.
Interest on mortgage-related securities decreased $271,000, or 6.5%, as a
result of a significant decline in the overall balance of the portfolio. The
balance of mortgage-related securities declined from $68.9 million as of June
30, 1995 to $51.5 million as of June 30, 1996. During the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1996, no additional mortgage-related securities were purchased by
Sentinel.
Income from the investment portfolio decreased $177,000, or 56.9%, from
$312,000 in fiscal 1995 to $134,000 in fiscal 1996, primarily due to the
maturity of a portion of the portfolio.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $183,000, or 2.5%, for the year
ended June 30, 1996, from the amount of such expense as of June 30, 1995. The
increase was the net effect of a decline in interest expense
140
<PAGE>
relating to FHLB advances and a rise in interest expense relating to savings
and certificate accounts. Average interest-bearing liabilities were $138.8
million for the year ended June 30, 1996 compared with $144.7 million for
fiscal 1995. The average rate paid increased from 5.07% in the year ended June
30, 1995 to 5.42% in the year ended June 30, 1996. The rise in interest
expense was less than the increase in interest income due to Sentinel's
efforts to reduce deposit costs and the increased use of intermediate-term
certificates of deposit and shorter term FHLB advances.
Provisions for Loan Losses. Provisions for loan losses are charged to
earnings to bring the total loss allowance to a level considered adequate by
management to provide for losses based on prior loss experience, volume and
type of lending conducted by Sentinel, industry standards and past due loans
in Sentinel's portfolio. Management also considers general economic conditions
and other factors relating to the collectability of Sentinel's loan portfolio.
During the year ended June 30, 1996, Sentinel provided no additional
allowance for loan losses. The provision for loan losses was $1,000 in fiscal
1995. As a result of recoveries of $1,000 during fiscal 1996, at June 30,
1996, the total allowance for loan losses was $319,000, or .39% of total loans
outstanding. Provisions are made based on management's analysis of the various
factors which affect the loan portfolio and management's desire to hold the
allowance at a level considered adequate to provide for losses and fleet
industry standards. Management performs a detailed analysis of Sentinel's loan
portfolio, including reviews of Sentinel's write-off history and an analysis
of Sentinel's allowance for losses as compared with industry and peer
averages. At June 30, 1996, the allowance for possible loan losses was
$319,000 and represented 189.7% of total non-accrual loans and loans past due
more than 90 days. At June 30, 1995, the allowance for loan losses was
$318,000 and represented 235.56% of total non-accrual loans and loans past due
more than 90 days. While management believes the allowance for loan losses at
June 30, 1996 is adequate to cover all losses inherent in the loan portfolio,
there can be no assurance that in the future Sentinel's allowance will not
require further increases.
Other Income. Other income increased $77,000 from $410,000 for the year
ended June 30, 1995 to $487,000 for the year ended June 30, 1996. This
increase was principally the result of increased income from loan sales and
increased fee income on loans originated for Sentinel's loan portfolio. During
the period, Sentinel also experienced increased rental income through
increased occupancy at its downtown office facility. Conversely, Sentinel
experienced reduced commissions earned on the sales of tax deferred annuity
products by Sentinel's second-tier subsidiary, Sentinel Insurance Agency, Inc.
Other Expense. Other expenses increased from $2.6 million as of June 30,
1995 to $3.4 million as of June 30, 1996. This $749,000 increase was the
result of several unusual items during the period.
Sentinel recorded a $242,000 loss provision to reflect the difference
between the current fair market value and the recorded book value of the 1001
Walnut Street Office Building. This activity reflected Sentinel Federal's
intent to close this facility after completion of a new North Kansas City
Office.
During the year ended June 30, 1996, a former employee of Sentinel filed a
sexual harassment suit against Sentinel. The suit was settled resulting in an
expense of $145,000 to Sentinel.
In connection with the Merger, Sentinel has incurred expenses relating to
the evaluation and negotiation of the transaction. During the fiscal year
ending June 30, 1996, total merger-related expenses were approximately
$135,000.
Income Taxes. During fiscal 1996, Sentinel reversed previously established
accruals relating to a tax position taken in prior years. Sentinel's 1991 and
1992 tax returns were filed with appropriate disclosure of the use of the
positions taken. As of March 15, 1996, the three year statute of limitations
expired. As a result of the reversal of previously established tax
liabilities, Sentinel recorded an after-tax benefit of $601,000. Income taxes
payable of June 30, 1996, without consideration of the benefit derived from
the statue expiration, were $112,000.
141
<PAGE>
COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1995 AND
1994
General. Net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995 was $630,000,
compared with $564,000 for fiscal year 1994, representing a 11.70% increase.
The increase was primarily attributable to Sentinel's efforts to reduce
overall liability costs and increase loan balances during the period. Non-
interest expense increased $142,000, or 5.38%, during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1995.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $608,000 to $3.1 million
for the year ended June 30, 1995, compared with $2.4 million for fiscal year
1994. The increase in net interest income reflects an increase in Sentinel's
net interest margin from 1.61% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 to
1.98% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995. The increase in net interest
income is primarily the result of two areas of operations. First, portfolio
loan balances have increased $8.7 million or 12.01%. Second, lower rate, ARM
mortgage-backed securities balances declined $4.2 million or 5.68%. While
interest expense increased during the period, Sentinel was less aggressive in
pricing retail deposits and utilized lower cost, FHLB advances, including an
open line of credit, to lessen the impact of a rising interest rate
environment during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995.
Interest Income. Interest income for the year ended June 30, 1995 was $10.4
million compared with $9.4 million for fiscal year 1994, representing a
increase of $1.0 million, or 10.64%. The average yield on interest-earning
assets increased from 6.15% for the year ended June 30, 1994 to 6.69% for
fiscal year 1995. Net loans receivable increased $8.7 million for the year
ended June 30, 1995 as a result of higher origination levels and significantly
lower loan prepayments during the period. Portfolio loan prepayments declined
from $19.7 million during fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 to $8.5 million
during the period ended June 30, 1995. During these same periods, total
portfolio loan production rose from $12.0 million during fiscal year ended
June 30, 1994 to $17.6 million for the year ended June 30, 1995.
Interest on mortgage-related securities increased $963,000 or 29.84%, as a
result of increased interest rates during the period. While the average
balance of mortgage-related securities increased approximately $3.5 million,
in the year ended June 30, 1995, the actual balance declined from $73.1
million as of June 30, 1994 to $68.9 million as of June 30, 1995. Sentinel
continued to purchase mortgage-related securities through the first half of
the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995. Subsequent to the first six months of the
fiscal year, no additional purchases have been made and the actual balance
declined during the remainder of the period.
Income from the investment portfolio increased $58,000 or 22.75% from
$253,941 in 1994 to $311,710 in 1995 primarily as the result of the purchase
of United States Treasury securities in February and March 1994.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $396,000, or 5.70%, for the
year ended June 30, 1995, compared with fiscal year 1994. The increase is
primarily attributable to increased interest rates during the period. Average
interest-bearing liabilities were $144.7 million for the year ended June 30,
1995 compared with $144.3 million for fiscal year 1994. The average rate paid
increased from 4.82% in the year ended June 30, 1994 to 5.07% in the year
ended June 30, 1995. The rise in interest expense was less than the increase
in interest income due to Sentinel's efforts to reduce deposit costs and the
increased use of shorter term FHLB advances.
Provisions for Loan Losses. For June 30, 1995 and 1994, Sentinel provided $0
and $42,000, respectively, for losses. During the fiscal year ended June 30,
1995, Sentinel provided no additional allowance for loan losses. Thus the
total allowance for loan losses remained $318,000, or .39% of total loans
outstanding. These provisions were made based on management's analysis of the
various factors which affect the loan portfolio and management's desire to
hold the allowance at a level considered adequate to provide for losses and
meet industry standards. Management performs a detailed analysis of Sentinel's
loan portfolio, including reviews of Sentinel's write-off history and an
analysis of Sentinel's allowance for losses as compared with industry and peer
averages. At June 30, 1995, the allowance for possible loan losses was
$318,000 and represented 235.56% of total non-accrual loans and loans past due
more than 90 days. At June 30, 1994, the allowance for loan losses was
$318,000 and represented 117.34% of total non-accrual loans and loans past due
more than 90 days.
142
<PAGE>
Other Income. Other income decreased $39,000 from $449,000 for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1994 to $410,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995.
This decrease was principally the result of reduced commissions earned on the
sales of tax deferred annuity products by Sentinel's second-tier subsidiary,
Sentinel Insurance Agency Inc. Gains on sales of assets held for sale and
securities available for sale, net were $84,000 in the year ended June 30,
1995 as compared to $35,000 in the year ended June 30, 1994. As of June 30,
1995, Sentinel's available for sale portfolio included one $1.1 million
adjustable rate FHLB agency debenture.
Other Expense. Other expenses increased from $2.5 million for the year ended
June 30, 1994 to $2.6 million for the year ended June 30, 1995. This $142,000
increase was primarily attributable to a $113,000 increase in salaries and
employee benefits attributable to a full year of amortization of deferred
compensation on Sentinel's Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") and
Management Recognition and Development Plans ("MRDP").
Income Taxes. Income tax expense increased $238,000 from $45,000 for fiscal
year ended June 30, 1994 to $283,000 for fiscal year ended June 30, 1995 as a
result of increased taxable income from $418,000 for fiscal year ended June
30, 1994 to $886,000 for fiscal year ended June 30, 1995, a reduction in the
utilization of Missouri intangible tax credit carry forwards, and a reduction
in the amount of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Management
expects to resolve certain income tax issues during fiscal 1996 which may
substantially reduce Sentinel's income tax expense for 1996. However, there
can be no assurance that such income tax benefit will occur.
143
<PAGE>
AVERAGE BALANCES, INTEREST AND AVERAGE YIELDS/COST
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information
regarding average balances of assets and liabilities as well as the total
dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and
interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, resultant yields,
interest rate spread, net interest margin, and ratio of average interest-
earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities. Average balances for a
period have been calculated using the average of month-end balances during
such period. Management does not believe that the use of month-end balances
instead of daily balances has caused any material difference in the
information presented.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST
AVERAGE AND YIELDS AVERAGE AND YIELD/ AVERAGE AND YIELD/
BALANCE DIVIDENDS COST BALANCE DIVIDENDS COST BALANCE DIVIDENDS COST
-------- --------- ------ -------- --------- ------ -------- --------- ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest-earning as-
sets(1):
Mortgage loans......... $ 73,552 $5,682 7.73% $ 74,249 $ 5,698 7.67% $ 79,341 $6,281 7.92%
Consumer loans......... 710 51 7.18 1,045 79 7.56 2,173 168 7.73
Commercial business
loans................. 739 57 7.71 978 78 7.98 2,623 210 8.01
-------- ------ ------ -------- ------- ------ -------- ------ ------
Total net loans........ 75,001 5,790 7.72 76,272 5,855 7.68 84,137 6,659 7.91
Mortgage-related secu-
rities................ 69,289 3,227 4.66 72,510 4,190 5.78 60,230 3,919 6.51
Investment securities.. 3,585 147 4.10 3,624 168 4.64 3,281 158 4.82
Interest-bearing
deposits in other
banks................. 3,519 103 2.93 1,592 66 4.15 2,681 134 5.00
Other earning assets... 1,848 151 8.17 1,848 143 7.74 1,867 134 7.18
-------- ------ ------ -------- ------- ------ -------- ------ ------
Total interest-earning
assets................ 153,242 $9,418 6.15% 155,846 $10,422 6.69% 152,196 11,004 7.23
====== ====== ======= ======
Non-interest-earning as-
sets:
Premises and equipment,
net................... 878 $ 810 663
Real estate owned,
net................... 52 0 --
Other non-interest-
earning assets........ 1,034 1,219 483
-------- -------- --------
Total assets........... $155,206 $157,875 $153,342
======== ======== ========
Interest-bearing liabil-
ities:
Passbook accounts...... $ 12,298 $ 326 2.65 $ 10,831 $ 297 2.74 $ 8,798 $ 252 2.86
Negotiable order of
withdrawal ("NOW")
accounts.............. 3,585 81 2.26 3,061 72 2.35 3,416 69 2.02
Money market accounts.. 20,286 596 2.94 19,168 785 4.10 19,644 909 4.63
Certificates of
deposit............... 98,637 5,136 5.21 95,533 5,144 5.38 93,453 5,563 5.95
-------- ------ ------ -------- ------- ------ -------- ------ ------
Total deposits......... 134,806 6,139 4.55 128,593 6,298 4.90 125,311 6,793 5.42
Other interest-bearing
liabilities........... 9,471 641 6.77 16,150 1,046 6.48 13,483 734 5.44
Termination of interest
rate swaps............ -- 168 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- ------ ------ -------- ------- ------ -------- ------ ------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities........... 144,277 6,948 4.82 144,743 7,344 5.07 138,794 7,527 5.42
------ ------- ------
Non-interest-bearing
liabilities:
Non-interest-bearing
deposits............... -- -- --
Other liabilities...... 3,424 2,873 3,406
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities...... 147,701 147,616 142,200
Stockholders' equity.... 7,505 10,259 11,142
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity.. $155,206 $157,875 $153,342
======== ======== ========
Net interest income..... $2,470 $ 3,078 $3,477
====== ======= ======
Interest rate spread.... 1.33% 1.61% 1.81%
Net interest margin..... 1.61% 1.98% 2.28%
Ratio of average
interest-earning assets
to average interest-
bearing liabilities.... 106.21% 107.67% 109.66%
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Does not include interest on nonaccrual loans or loans 90 days or more
past due.
144
<PAGE>
YIELDS EARNED AND RATES PAID
The following table sets forth (on a consolidated basis) for the periods and
at the date indicated, the weighted average yields earned on Sentinel
Federal's assets and the weighted average interest rates paid on Sentinel
Federal's liabilities, together with the net interest margin.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------
1994 1995 1996
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted average yield on:
Loan portfolio...................................... 7.72% 7.68% 7.92%
Mortgage-related securities......................... 4.67 5.78 6.51
Investment portfolio................................ 4.10 4.64 4.82
All interest-earning assets......................... 6.15 6.69 7.23
Weighted average rate paid on:
Deposits............................................ 4.55 4.90 5.42
Advances from FHLB.................................. 6.77 6.48 5.44
All interest-bearing liabilities.................... 4.82 5.07 5.42
Interest rate spread (spread between weighted average
rate on all interest-earning assets and all interest-
bearing liabilities)................................. 1.33 1.61 1.81
Net interest margin (net interest income (expense) as
a percentage of average interest-earning assets)..... 1.61 1.98 2.28
</TABLE>
RATE/VOLUME TABLE
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on
net interest income of Sentinel Federal. Information is provided with respect
to (i) effects on interest income attributable to changes in volume (changes
in volume multiplied by prior rate); (ii) effects on interest income
attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume);
and (iii) changes in rate/volume (change in rate multiplied by change in
volume).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 COMPARED TO 1994 1996 COMPARED TO 1995
-------------------------------- ---------------------------
INCREASE (DECREASE) INCREASE (DECREASE)
DUE TO DUE TO
------------------------ ---------------------------
RATE/ RATE/
RATE VOLUME VOLUME NET RATE VOLUME VOLUME NET
------ ------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------ -----
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest-earning assets:
Mortgage loans(1)....... $ (44) $ 54 $ 6 $ 16 $ 186 $ 391 $ 6 $ 583
Consumer loans(1)....... 3 24 1 28 2 85 2 89
Commercial business
loans(1)............... 2 18 1 21 -- 131 1 132
------ ------ ------- ----- ----- ----- ---- -----
Total loans(1).......... (39) 96 8 65 188 607 9 804
Mortgage-related securi-
ties................... 766 164 32 962 529 (710) (90) (271)
Investment and trading
securities............. 19 2 45 66 7 (16) (1) (10)
Interest-bearing depos-
its.................... 43 (56) (68) (81) 14 45 9 68
Other earning assets.... (8) -- -- (8) (10) 1 -- (9)
------ ------ ------- ----- ----- ----- ---- -----
Total net change in
income on interest-
earning assets......... 781 206 17 1,004 728 (73) (73) 582
------ ------ ------- ----- ----- ----- ---- -----
Interest-bearing liabil-
ities:
Interest-bearing depos-
its.................... 472 (283) (30) 159 669 (161) (13) 495
FHLB advances........... (28) 452 (19) 405 (168) (173) 29 (312)
Termination of interest
rate swaps............. -- -- (168) (168) -- -- -- --
------ ------ ------- ----- ----- ----- ---- -----
Total net change in
expense on interest-
bearing liabilities.... 444 169 (217) 396 501 (334) 16 183
------ ------ ------- ----- ----- ----- ---- -----
Net change in net inter-
est income............. $ 337 $ 37 $ 234 $ 608 $ 227 $ 261 ($89) $ 399
====== ====== ======= ===== ===== ===== ==== =====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Does not include interest on loans 90 days or more past due.
145
<PAGE>
ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the
extent to which such assets and liabilities are "interest rate sensitive" and
by monitoring an institution's interest rate sensitivity "gap." An asset or
liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period
if it will mature or reprice within that time period. The interest rate
sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest-
earning assets anticipated, based upon certain assumptions, to mature or
reprice within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing
liabilities anticipated, based upon certain assumptions, to mature or reprice
within that time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of
interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive
liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate
sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets.
During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to
adversely affect net interest income while a positive gap would tend to result
in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest
rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest
income while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest
income.
Prior to June 30, 1991, Sentinel Federal had typically maintained a negative
one-year gap position. This position had generally resulted in a positive
impact during a declining rate environment and a negative impact during a
rising rate environment. Since that period the association has typically
maintained a positive gap position. The one-year gap can be described as the
difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
that reprice during a one-year time frame. Sentinel Federal's one-year
adjusted gap position has moved from a negative 3.4% as of June 30, 1991, to a
positive 11.03% as of June 30, 1996. The change from a negative to a positive
gap position was the result several factors including among other items,
substantially increased capital levels, significant prepayment of fixed rate
mortgage loans and investment in adjustable rate mortgage related securities.
Although the one-year gap ratio is used as a measure of interest rate risk,
Sentinel Federal also employs other asset liability techniques including
measuring the market value of Sentinel Federal's portfolio equity position and
the use of a planning model to project Association activities under a given
interest rate environment. The use of several separate techniques helps reduce
the risks associated with using one monitoring tool. There can be no assurance
that any of Sentinel Federal's monitoring techniques can or will reflect
market conditions due to the impact of external events such as market
competition, the Treasury yield curve and other market forces. The models are
used, however, to assist management in evaluating the risks relative to net
income expectations. Mortgage prepayment rates and core deposit decay rates
are based on OTS tables with some variance based on Sentinel Federal's
portfolio experience.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the
following table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have
similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different
degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on
certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in
market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind
changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as ARM loans, have
features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis over
the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates,
prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from
those assumed in calculating the table. Finally, the ability of many borrowers
to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.
Sentinel Federal's analysis of its interest-rate sensitivity incorporates
certain assumptions concerning the amortization of loans and other interest-
earning assets and the withdrawal of deposits. The interest-rate sensitivity
of Sentinel Federal's assets and liabilities illustrated in the table could
vary substantially if different assumptions were used or if actual experience
differs from the assumptions used. Sentinel Federal relies upon an internal
gap report and an internal market value of portfolio equity ("MVPE") analysis
which utilize OTS and management assumptions. These assumptions include a
fixed rate mortgage loan constant prepayment rate approximating 12.50%.
Adjustable-rate mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities are also
assigned constant prepayment rates, however, these instruments generally
reprice in one year or less and appear in the appropriate gap column.
146
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth Sentinel Federal's interest sensitivity gap
between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at June 30,
1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WITHIN OVER
SIX 6 MONTHS 1-3 3-5 6-10 10
MONTHS TO ONE YEAR YEARS YEARS YEARS YEARS TOTAL
------- ----------- -------- ------- ------ ------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest-earning assets:
Fixed-rate mortgage
loans(1)............. $ 1,534 $ 1,569 $ 10,439 $ 9,850 $7,260 $ 5,240 $ 35,892
ARM loans(1).......... 17,494 16,689 4,911 5,266 366 -- 44,726
Mortgage-related
securities........... 32,269 18,158 1,093 -- -- -- 51,520
Other loans(1)........ 166 110 167 2,014 28 -- 2,485
Investment securities
and interest-bearing
deposits............. 3,809 2,000 -- -- -- -- 5,809
------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------- --------
Total rate sensitive
assets............. 55,272 38,526 16,610 17,130 7,654 5,240 140,432
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
Deposits:
Regular savings and
NOW accounts......... 1,737 1,359 3,298 2,620 1,608 1,181 11,802
Money market deposit
accounts............. 7,252 7,252 2,835 1,468 197 46 19,051
Certificates of
deposit.............. 32,021 22,124 26,186 9,519 2,551 -- 92,400
Other................. 2,500 2,000 2,500 -- -- -- 7,000
------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------- --------
Total rate sensitive
liabilities........ 43,510 32,735 34,819 13,607 4,356 1,227 130,253
------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------- --------
Excess (deficiency) of
interest sensitive
assets over interest
sensitive liabilities.. $11,762 $ 5,791 $(18,209) $ 3,523 $3,298 $ 4,013 $ 10,179
======= ======= ======== ======= ====== ======= ========
Cumulative excess
(deficiency) of
interest sensitive
assets................. $11,762 $17,554 $ (655) $ 2,868 $6,166 $10,179 $ 10,179
======= ======= ======== ======= ====== ======= ========
Cumulative ratio of
interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing
liabilities............ 1.27% 1.23% 0.99% 1.02% 1.05% 1.08% 1.08
Interest sensitivity gap
to total assets........ 8.18 4.03 -12.66 2.45 2.29 2.79 7.08
Ratio of interest-
earning assets to
interest-bearing
liabilities............ 1.27 1.18 0.48 1.26 1.76 4.27 1.08
Ratio of cumulative gap
to total assets........ 8.18 12.20 -0.46 2.00 4.29 7.08 7.08
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Excludes undisbursed loan funds, unearned loans fees, net and allowance
for loan losses.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sentinel Federal's primary sources of funds are customer deposits, proceeds
from principal and interest payments on loans, interest payments on mortgage-
related and investment securities, proceeds from sales of loans, maturing
securities and FHLB advances. While maturities and scheduled amortization of
loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage
prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic
conditions and competition.
147
<PAGE>
Sentinel Federal must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the
availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth and deposit
withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of
investment opportunities. Sentinel Federal generally maintains sufficient cash
and short-term investments to meet short-term liquidity needs. At June 30,
1996, cash (including interest-bearing deposits) and securities available for
sale totalled $3.7 million, or 2.5% of total assets, and mortgage-related and
investment securities that matured in one year or less totalled $2.0 million,
or 1.3% of total assets. In addition, Sentinel Federal maintains a credit
facility with the FHLB-Des Moines, which provides for immediately available
advances. Advances under this credit facility totalled $7.0 million at June
30, 1996.
The OTS requires a savings institution to maintain an average daily balance
of liquid assets (cash and eligible investments) equal to at least 5.0% of the
average daily balance of its net withdrawable deposits and short-term
borrowings. In addition, short-term liquid assets currently must constitute
1.0% of the sum of net withdrawable deposit accounts plus short-term
borrowings. Sentinel Federal's actual short- and long-term liquidity ratios at
June 30, 1996 were 2.6% and 6.1%, respectively. Sentinel Federal consistently
maintains liquidity levels in excess of regulatory requirements, and believes
this is an appropriate strategy for proper asset and liability management.
The primary investing activity of Sentinel Federal is the origination of
mortgage loans and the purchase of mortgage-related securities. During the
years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996, Sentinel Federal originated loans in
the amounts of $18.5 million, $21.2 million, and $29.3 million, respectively,
and purchased mortgage-related securities in the amounts of $31.0 million,
$10.0 million and $0, respectively. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal had
loan commitments and undisbursed equity lines of credit totalling $1.2 million
and undisbursed loans in process totalling $943,000. Sentinel Federal
anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current
loan origination commitments. Certificates of deposit that are scheduled to
mature in less than one year from June 30, 1996 totalled $54.5 million.
Historically, Sentinel Federal has been able to retain a significant amount of
its deposits as they mature. In addition, management of Sentinel Federal
believes that it can adjust the offering rates of savings certificates to
retain deposits in changing interest rate environments.
Recently enacted federal legislation to recapitalize the SAIF would require
savings associations like Sentinel Federal to pay a one-time assessment to
increase the SAIF's reserves to $1.25 per $100 of deposits. Such assessment
will be approximately .657% of the amount of deposits held by a SAIF-member
institution as of March 31, 1995. Based on Sentinel Federal's level of
assessable deposits, a one-time assessment of .657%, would equal approximately
$845,000 on a pre-tax basis. Sentinel Federal believes that it has adequate
resources to pay such assessment from cash and other liquid investments,
including short-term investment securities. For further discussion of the
recently enacted legislation, see "Recent Developments."
Sentinel Federal is required to maintain specific amounts of capital
pursuant to OTS requirements. As of June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal was in
compliance with all regulatory capital requirements which were effective as of
such date with tangible, core and risk-based capital ratios of 7.73%, 7.73%
and 20.52%, respectively. For a detailed discussion of regulatory capital
requirements, see "Regulation of Sentinel Financial Corporation and Sentinel
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City--Federal Regulation of
Savings Associations--Capital Requirements"
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See Note 1 of "Financial Statements of Sentinel Financial Corporation--
Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditors' Report for the
Years Ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996" for a discussion of new accounting
standards.
148
<PAGE>
REGULATION OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY.
GENERAL
Sentinel Federal is subject to extensive regulation, examination and
supervision by the OTS as its chartering agency, and the FDIC, as the insurer
of its deposits. The activities of federal savings institutions are governed
by the HOLA and, in certain respects, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act
("FDIA") and the regulations issued by the OTS and the FDIC to implement these
statutes. These laws and regulations delineate the nature and extent of the
activities in which federal savings associations may engage. Lending
activities and other investments must comply with various statutory and
regulatory capital requirements. In addition, Sentinel Federal's relationship
with its depositors and borrowers is also regulated to a great extent,
especially in such matters as the ownership of deposit accounts and the form
and content of Sentinel Federal's mortgage documents. Sentinel Federal must
file reports with the OTS and the FDIC concerning its activities and financial
condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals prior to entering into
certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other financial
institutions. There are periodic examinations by the OTS and the FDIC to
review Sentinel Federal's compliance with various regulatory requirements. The
regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive
discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and
examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of
assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory
purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by the OTS, the FDIC or the
United States Congress, could have a material adverse impact on Sentinel,
Sentinel Federal and their operations. Sentinel, as a savings and loan holding
company, is also required to file certain reports with, and otherwise comply
with the rules and regulations of, the OTS.
FEDERAL REGULATION OF SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS
Office of Thrift Supervision. The OTS is an office in the Department of the
Treasury subject to the general oversight of the Secretary of the Treasury.
The OTS generally possesses the supervisory and regulatory duties and
responsibilities formerly vested in the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. Among
other functions, the OTS issues and enforces regulations affecting federally
insured savings associations and regularly examines these institutions.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. The FHLB System, consisting of 12 FHLBs, is
under the jurisdiction of the FHFB. The designated duties of the FHFB are to
supervise the FHLBs, to ensure that the FHLBs carry out their housing finance
mission, to ensure that the FHLBs remain adequately capitalized and able to
raise funds in the capital markets, and to ensure that the FHLBs operate in a
safe and sound manner.
Sentinel Federal, as a member of the FHLB-Des Moines, is required to acquire
and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB-Des Moines in an amount equal to
the greater of (i) 1.0% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of
residential mortgage loans, home purchase contracts and similar obligations at
the beginning of each year, or (ii) 1/20 of its advances (borrowings) from the
FHLB-Des Moines. Sentinel Federal is in compliance with this requirement with
an investment in FHLB-Des Moines stock of $1.9 million at June 30, 1996.
Among other benefits, the FHLB provides a central credit facility primarily
for member institutions. It is funded primarily from proceeds derived from the
sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB System. It makes advances to
members in accordance with policies and procedures established by the FHFB and
the Board of Directors of the FHLB-Des Moines.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The FDIC is an independent federal
agency established originally to insure the deposits, up to prescribed
statutory limits, of federally insured banks and to preserve the safety and
soundness of the banking industry. In 1989 the FDIC also became the insurer,
up to the prescribed limits, of the deposit accounts held at federally insured
savings associations and established two separate insurance funds: the
149
<PAGE>
BIF and the SAIF. As insurer of deposits, the FDIC has examination,
supervisory and enforcement authority over all savings associations.
Sentinel Federal's accounts are insured by the SAIF. The FDIC insures
deposits at Sentinel Federal to the maximum extent permitted by law. Sentinel
Federal currently pays deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC based on a risk-
based assessment system established by the FDIC for all SAIF-member
institutions. Under applicable regulations, institutions are assigned to one
of three capital groups that are based solely on the level of an institution's
capital--"well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," and
"undercapitalized"--which are defined in the same manner as the regulations
establishing the prompt corrective action system, as discussed below. These
three groups are then divided into three subgroups which reflect varying
levels of supervisory concern, from those which are considered to be healthy
to those which are considered to be of substantial supervisory concern. The
matrix so created results in nine assessment risk classifications, with rates
currently ranging from .23% for well capitalized, financially sound
institutions with only a few minor weaknesses to .31% for undercapitalized
institutions that pose a substantial risk of loss to the SAIF unless effective
corrective action is taken. Until the second half of 1995, the same matrix
applied to BIF-member institutions. The FDIC is authorized to raise assessment
rates in certain circumstances. Sentinel Federal's assessments expensed for
the year ended June 30, 1996 totalled $367,000.
Effective January 1, 1996, the FDIC substantially reduced deposit insurance
premiums for well-capitalized, well-managed financial institutions that are
members of the BIF. Under the new assessment schedule, rates were reduced to a
range of 0 to 27 basis points, with approximately 92% of BIF members paying
the statutory minimum annual assessment rate of $2,000. With respect to SAIF
member institutions, the FDIC has retained the existing rate schedule of 23 to
31 basis points.
The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository
institution if it determines after a hearing that the institution has engaged
or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound
condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law,
regulation, order or any condition imposed by an agreement with the FDIC. It
also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for
the permanent termination of insurance, if the institution has no tangible
capital. If insurance of accounts is terminated, the accounts at the
institution at the time of termination, less subsequent withdrawals, shall
continue to be insured for a period of six months to two years, as determined
by the FDIC. Management is aware of no existing circumstances that could
result in termination of the deposit insurance of Sentinel Federal.
Liquidity Requirements. Under OTS regulations, each savings institution is
required to maintain an average daily balance of liquid assets (cash, certain
time deposits and savings accounts, bankers' acceptances, and specified U.S.
Government, state or federal agency obligations and certain other investments)
equal to a monthly average of not less than a specified percentage (currently
5.0%) of its net withdrawable accounts plus short-term borrowings. OTS
regulations also require each savings institution to maintain an average daily
balance of short-term liquid assets at a specified percentage (currently 1.0%)
of the total of its net withdrawable savings accounts and borrowings payable
in one year or less. Monetary penalties may be imposed for failure to meet
liquidity requirements.
Prompt Corrective Action. Under the FDIA, each federal banking agency is
required to implement a system of prompt corrective action for institutions
that it regulates. The federal banking agencies have promulgated substantially
similar regulations to implement this system of prompt corrective action.
Under the regulations, an institution shall be deemed to be (i) "well
capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or more, has
a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or more, has a leverage ratio of
5.0% or more and is not subject to specified requirements to meet and maintain
a specific capital level for any capital measure; (ii) "adequately
capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or more, a
Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or more and a leverage ratio of 4.0%
or more (3.0% under certain circumstances) and does not meet the definition of
"well capitalized;" (iii) "undercapitalized" if it has a total risk-based
capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio that
is less than 4.0% or a leverage ratio that is less than 4.0% (3.0% under
certain circumstances); (iv) "significantly undercapitalized" if it has a
total risk-based capital ratio
150
<PAGE>
that is less than 6.0%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio that is less than
3.0% or a leverage ratio that is less than 3.0%; and (v) "critically
undercapitalized" if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is
equal to or less than 2.0%.
A federal banking agency may, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing,
reclassify a well capitalized institution as adequately capitalized and may
require an adequately capitalized institution or an undercapitalized
institution to comply with supervisory actions as if it were in the next lower
category if the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or has
received in its most recent examination, and has not corrected, a less than
satisfactory rating for asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity. The
OTS may not, however, reclassify a significantly undercapitalized institution
as critically undercapitalized.
An institution generally must file a written capital restoration plan that
meets specified requirements, as well as a performance guaranty by each
company that controls the institution, with the appropriate federal banking
agency within 45 days of the date that the institution receives notice or is
deemed to have notice that it is undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized. Immediately upon becoming
undercapitalized, an institution shall become subject to various mandatory and
discretionary restrictions on its operations.
At June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal was categorized as "well capitalized"
under the prompt corrective action regulations of the OTS.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. The FDIA requires the federal banking
regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation, standards for all insured
depository institutions relating to: (i) internal controls, information
systems and internal audit systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit
underwriting; (iv) interest rate risk exposure; (v) asset growth; and (vi)
compensation, fees and benefits. The federal banking agencies have adopted
regulations and the Interagency Guidelines Prescribing Standards for Safety
and Soundness ("Guidelines") to implement safety and soundness standards
required by the FDIA. The federal banking agencies use these standards to
identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before
capital becomes impaired. The agencies have also proposed asset quality and
earnings standards which, if adopted, would be added to the Guidelines. If the
OTS determines that Sentinel Federal fails to meet any standard prescribed by
the Guidelines, the agency may require Sentinel Federal to submit to the
agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard, as required
by the FDIA. OTS regulations establish deadlines for the submission and review
of such safety and soundness compliance plans.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. All savings associations are required to meet
a qualified thrift lender ("QTL") test to avoid certain restrictions on their
operations. A savings institution that fails to become or remain a QTL shall
either become a national bank or be subject to the following restrictions on
its operations: (i) the association may not make any new investment or engage
in activities that would not be permissible for national banks; (ii) the
association may not establish any new branch office where a national bank
located in the savings institution's home state would not be able to establish
a branch office; (iii) the association shall be ineligible to obtain new
advances from any FHLB; and (iv) the payment of dividends by the association
shall be subject to the rules regarding the statutory and regulatory dividend
restrictions applicable to national banks. Also, beginning three years after
the date on which the savings institution ceases to be a QTL, the savings
institution would be prohibited from retaining any investment or engaging in
any activity not permissible for a national bank and would be required to
repay any outstanding advances to any FHLB. In addition, within one year of
the date on which a savings association controlled by a company ceases to be a
QTL, the company must register as a bank holding company and become subject to
the rules applicable to such companies. A savings institution may requalify as
a QTL if it thereafter complies with the QTL test.
Currently, the QTL test requires that 65% of an institution's "portfolio
assets" consist of certain housing and consumer-related assets on a monthly
average basis in nine out of every 12 months. At June 30, 1996, the qualified
thrift investments of Sentinel Federal were approximately 96.0% of its
portfolio assets.
151
<PAGE>
Capital Requirements. Under OTS regulations, a savings association must
satisfy three minimum capital requirements: core capital, tangible capital and
risk-based capital.
OTS regulations establish a 3% core capital or leverage ratio (defined as
the ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets) requirement. Core capital
is defined to include common stockholders' equity, noncumulative perpetual
preferred stock and any related surplus, and minority interests in equity
accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less (i) any intangible assets, except
for certain qualifying intangible assets; (ii) certain mortgage servicing
rights; and (iii) equity and debt investments in subsidiaries that are not
"includable subsidiaries," defined as subsidiaries engaged solely in
activities not impermissible for a national bank, engaged in activities
impermissible for a national bank but only as an agent for its customers, or
engaged solely in mortgage-banking activities. In calculating adjusted total
assets, adjustments are made to total assets to give effect to the exclusion
of certain assets from capital and to account appropriately for the
investments in and assets of both includable and nonincludable subsidiaries.
Institutions that fail to meet the core capital requirement would be required
to file with the OTS a capital plan that details the steps they will take to
reach compliance. In addition, the OTS's prompt corrective action regulation
provides that a savings institution that has a leverage ratio of less than 4%
(3% for institutions receiving the highest CAMEL examination rating) will be
deemed to be "undercapitalized" and may be subject to certain restrictions.
See "--Federal Regulation of Savings Associations--Prompt Corrective Action."
As required by federal law, the OTS has proposed a rule revising its minimum
core capital requirement to be no less stringent than that imposed on national
banks. The OTS has proposed that only those savings associations rated a
composite one (the highest rating) under the CAMEL rating system for savings
associations will be permitted to operate at or near the regulatory minimum
leverage ratio of 3%. All other savings associations will be required to
maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 4% to 5%. The OTS will assess each
individual savings association through the supervisory process on a case-by-
case basis to determine the applicable requirement. No assurance can be given
as to the final form of any such regulation, the date of its effectiveness or
the requirement applicable to Sentinel Federal.
A savings association also must maintain "tangible capital" not less than
1.5% of its adjusted total assets. "Tangible capital" is defined generally as
core capital minus any "intangible assets" other than purchased mortgage
servicing rights.
Each savings institution must maintain total risk-based capital equal to at
least 8% of risk-weighted assets. Total risk-based capital consists of the sum
of core and supplementary capital, provided that supplementary capital cannot
exceed core capital, as previously defined. Supplementary capital includes (i)
permanent capital instruments such as cumulative perpetual preferred stock,
perpetual subordinated debt and mandatory convertible subordinated debt, (ii)
maturing capital instruments such as subordinated debt, intermediate-term
preferred stock and mandatory convertible subordinated debt, subject to an
amortization schedule, and (iii) general valuation loan and lease loss
allowances up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets.
The risk-based capital regulation assigns each balance sheet asset held by a
savings institution to one of four risk categories based on the amount of
credit risk associated with that particular class of assets. Assets not
included for purposes of calculating capital are not included in calculating
risk-weighted assets. The categories range from 0% for cash and securities
that are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government to 100%
for repossessed assets or assets more than 90 days past due. Qualifying
residential mortgage loans (including multi-family mortgage loans) are
assigned a 50% risk weight. Consumer, commercial, home equity and residential
construction loans are assigned a 100% risk weight, as are nonqualifying
residential mortgage loans and that portion of land loans and nonresidential
construction loans that does not exceed an 80% loan-to-value ratio. The book
value of assets in each category is multiplied by the weighing factor (from 0%
to 100%) assigned to that category. These products are then totalled to arrive
at total risk-weighted assets. Off-balance sheet items are included in risk-
weighted assets by converting them to an approximate balance sheet "credit
equivalent amount" based on a conversion schedule. These credit equivalent
amounts are then assigned to risk categories in the same manner as balance
sheet assets and included risk- weighted assets.
152
<PAGE>
The OTS has incorporated an interest rate risk component into its regulatory
capital rule. Under the rule, savings associations with "above normal"
interest rate risk exposure are subject to a deduction from total capital for
purposes of calculating their risk-based capital requirements. A savings
association's interest rate risk is measured by the decline in the net
portfolio value of its assets (i.e., the difference between incoming and
outgoing discounted cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet
contracts) that would result from a hypothetical 200 basis point increase or
decrease in market interest rates divided by the estimated economic value of
the association's assets, as calculated in accordance with guidelines set
forth by the OTS. A savings association whose measured interest rate risk
exposure exceeds 2% must deduct an interest rate risk component in calculating
its total capital under the risk-based capital rule. The interest rate risk
component is an amount equal to one-half of the difference between the
institution's measured interest rate risk and 2%, multiplied by the estimated
economic value of the association's assets. That dollar amount is deducted
from an association's total capital in calculating compliance with its risk-
based capital requirement. Under the rule, there is a two quarter lag between
the reporting date of an institution's financial data and the effective date
for the new capital requirement based on that data. A savings association with
assets of less than $300 million and a risk-based capital ratio in excess of
12% is not subject to the interest rate risk component, unless the OTS
determines otherwise. The rule also provides that the Director of the OTS may
waive or defer an association's interest rate risk component on a case-by-case
basis. Under certain circumstances, a savings association may request an
adjustment to its interest rate risk component if it believes that the OTS-
calculated interest rate risk component overstates its interest rate risk
exposure. In addition, certain "well-capitalized" institutions may obtain
authorization to use their own interest rate risk model to calculate their
interest rate risk component in lieu of the OTS-calculated amount. The OTS has
postponed the date that the component will first be deducted from an
institution's total capital until savings associations become familiar with
the process for requesting an adjustment to its interest rate risk component.
The following table sets forth Sentinel Federal's capital levels as of June
30, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30, 1996
--------------------------
PERCENT OF
AMOUNT ASSETS
------------ -------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Tangible capital.................................... $ 11,144 7.73%
Minimum required tangible capital................... 2,161 1.50
------------ ----------
Excess.............................................. $ 8,983 6.23%
============ ==========
Core capital........................................ $ 11,144 7.73%
Minimum required core capital....................... 4,323 3.00
------------ ----------
Excess.............................................. $ 6,821 4.73%
============ ==========
Risk-based capital.................................. $ 11,463 20.52%
Minimum risk-based capital requirement.............. 4,469 8.00
------------ ----------
Excess.............................................. $ 6,994 12.52%
============ ==========
</TABLE>
Limitations on Capital Distributions. OTS regulations impose uniform
limitations on the ability of all savings associations to engage in various
distributions of capital such as dividends, stock repurchases and cash-out
mergers. In addition, OTS regulations require Sentinel Federal to give the OTS
30 days' advance notice of any proposed declaration of dividends, and the OTS
has the authority under its supervisory powers to prohibit the payment of
dividends. The regulation utilizes a three-tiered approach which permits
various levels of distributions based primarily upon a savings association's
capital level.
A Tier 1 savings association has capital in excess of its fully phased-in
capital requirement (both before and after the proposed capital distribution).
Tier 1 savings association may make (without application but upon prior notice
to, and no objection made by, the OTS) capital distributions during a calendar
year up to 100% of its net income to date during the calendar year plus one-
half its surplus capital ratio (i.e., the amount of capital in excess
153
<PAGE>
of its fully phased-in requirement) at the beginning of the calendar year or
the amount authorized for a Tier 2 association. Capital distributions in
excess of such amount require advance notice to the OTS. A Tier 2 savings
association has capital equal to or in excess of its minimum capital
requirement but below its fully phased-in capital requirement (both before and
after the proposed capital distribution). Such an association may make
(without application) capital distributions up to an amount equal to 75% of
its net income during the previous four quarters depending on how close the
association is to meeting its fully phased-in capital requirement. Capital
distributions exceeding this amount require prior OTS approval. Tier 3
associations are savings associations with capital below the minimum capital
requirement (either before or after the proposed capital distribution). Tier 3
associations may not make any capital distributions without prior approval
from the OTS.
Sentinel Federal currently meets the criteria to be designated a Tier 1
association and, consequently, could at its option (after prior notice to, and
no objection made by, the OTS) distribute up to 100% of its net income during
the calendar year plus 50% of its surplus capital ratio at the beginning of
the calendar year less any distributions previously paid during the year.
Loans to One Borrower. Under the HOLA, savings institutions are generally
subject to the same limit on loans to one borrower as are national banks.
Generally, this limit is 15% of a savings association's unimpaired capital and
surplus, plus an additional 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if such
loan is secured by readily-marketable collateral, which is defined to include
certain financial instruments and bullion. The OTS by regulation has amended
its loans to one borrower rule to permit savings associations meeting certain
requirements, including capital requirements, to extend loans to one borrower
in excess of the general limitation in the case of loans to develop or
complete residential housing units. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal's limit
on loans to one borrower was $1.8 million. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel
Federal's highest amount of loans to one borrower was $1.1 million.
Activities of Associations and Their Subsidiaries. When a savings
association establishes or acquires a subsidiary or elects to conduct any new
activity through a subsidiary that the association controls, the savings
association must notify the FDIC and the OTS 30 days in advance and provide
certain information required by applicable regulations. Savings associations
also must conduct the activities of subsidiaries in accordance with existing
regulations and orders.
The OTS may determine that the continuation by a savings association of its
ownership control of, or its relationship to, the subsidiary constitutes a
serious risk to the safety, soundness or stability of the association or is
inconsistent with sound banking practices or with the purposes of the FDIA.
Based upon that determination, the FDIC or the OTS has the authority to order
the savings association to divest itself of control of the subsidiary. The
FDIC also may determine by regulation or order that any specific activity
poses a serious threat to the SAIF. If so, it may require that no SAIF member
engage in that activity directly.
Transactions with Affiliates. Savings associations must comply with Sections
23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act ("Sections 23A and 23B") relative to
transactions with affiliates in the same manner and to the same extent as if
the savings association were a Federal Reserve member bank. A savings and loan
holding company, its subsidiaries and any other company under common control
are considered affiliates of the subsidiary savings association under the
HOLA. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B: (i) limit the extent to which the
insured association or its subsidiaries may engage in certain covered
transactions with an affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such institution's
capital and surplus and place an aggregate limit on all such transactions with
affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital and surplus, and (ii)
require that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at
least as favorable to the institution or subsidiary, as those provided to a
non-affiliate. The term "covered transaction" includes the making of loans,
the purchase of assets, the issuance of a guarantee and similar types of
transactions.
Three additional rules apply to savings associations: (i) a savings
association may not make any loan or other extension of credit to an affiliate
unless that affiliate is engaged only in activities permissible for bank
holding companies; (ii) a savings association may not purchase or invest in
securities issued by an affiliate (other
154
<PAGE>
than securities of a subsidiary); and (iii) the OTS may, for reasons of safety
and soundness, impose more stringent restrictions on savings associations but
may not exempt transactions from or otherwise abridge Section 23A or 23B.
Exemptions from Section 23A or 23B may be granted only by the Federal Reserve
Board, as is currently the case with respect to all FDIC-insured banks.
Sentinel Federal has not been significantly affected by the rules regarding
transactions with affiliates.
Sentinel Federal's authority to extend credit to executive officers,
directors and ten percent shareholders, as well as entities controlled by such
persons, is currently governed by Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal
Reserve Act, and Regulation O thereunder. Among other things, these
regulations require that such loans be made on terms and conditions
substantially the same as those offered to unaffiliated individuals and not
involve more than the normal risk of repayment. Regulation O also places
individual and aggregate limits on the amount of loans Sentinel Federal may
make to such persons based, in part, on Sentinel Federal's capital position,
and requires certain board approval procedures to be followed. The OTS
regulations, with certain minor variances, apply Regulation O to savings
institutions.
SAVINGS AND LOAN HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION
General. Sentinel Financial is a unitary savings and loan holding company
within the meaning of the HOLA. As such, Sentinel is registered with the OTS
and subject to OTS regulations, examinations, supervision and reporting
requirements. Sentinel is required to file certain reports with, and otherwise
comply with the regulations of, the OTS and the SEC. As a subsidiary of a
savings and loan holding company, Sentinel Federal is subject to certain
restrictions in its dealings with Sentinel and with other companies affiliated
with Sentinel and also are subject to regulatory requirements and provisions
as federal institutions.
Holding Company Acquisitions. The HOLA and OTS regulations issued thereunder
generally prohibit a savings and loan holding company, without prior OTS
approval, from acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of any other savings
association or savings and loan holding company or controlling the assets
thereof. They also prohibit, among other things, any director or officer of a
savings and loan holding company, or any individual who owns or controls more
than 25% of the voting shares of such holding company, from acquiring control
of any savings association not a subsidiary of such savings and loan holding
company, unless the acquisition is approved by the OTS.
Holding Company Activities. As a unitary savings and loan holding company,
Sentinel generally is not subject to activity restrictions. If Sentinel
acquires control of another savings association as a separate subsidiary other
than in a supervisory acquisition, it would become a multiple savings and loan
holding company. There generally are more restrictions on the activities of a
multiple savings and loan holding company than on those of a unitary savings
and loan holding company. The HOLA provides that, among other things, no
multiple savings and loan holding company or subsidiary thereof which is not
an insured association shall commence or continue for more than two years
after becoming a multiple savings and loan association holding company or
subsidiary thereof, any business activity other than: (i) furnishing or
performing management services for a subsidiary insured institution, (ii)
conducting an insurance agency or escrow business, (iii) holding, managing, or
liquidating assets owned by or acquired from a subsidiary insured institution,
(iv) holding or managing properties used or occupied by a subsidiary insured
institution, (v) acting as trustee under deeds of trust, (vi) those activities
previously directly authorized by regulation as of March 5, 1987 to be engaged
in by multiple holding companies or (vii) those activities authorized by the
Federal Reserve Board as permissible for bank holding companies, unless the
OTS by regulation, prohibits or limits such activities for savings and loan
holding companies. Those activities described in (vii) above also must be
approved by the OTS prior to being engaged in by a multiple holding company.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. The HOLA requires any savings and loan holding
company that controls a savings association that fails the QTL test, as
explained under "--Federal Regulation of Savings Associations--Qualified
Thrift Lender Test," must, within one year after the date on which the
association ceases to be a QTL, register as and be deemed a bank holding
company subject to all applicable laws and regulations.
155
<PAGE>
FEDERAL TAXATION
General. Sentinel and Sentinel Federal report their income on a fiscal year
basis using the accrual method of accounting and will be subject to federal
income taxation in the same manner as other corporations with some exceptions,
including particularly Sentinel Federal's reserve for bad debts discussed
below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary
and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules
applicable to Sentinel Federal or Sentinel.
Tax Bad Debt Reserves. For taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 1996,
savings institutions such as Sentinel Federal which met certain definitional
tests primarily relating to their assets and the nature of their business
("qualifying thrifts") were permitted to establish a reserve for bad debts and
to make annual additions thereto, which additions may, within specified
formula limits, have been deducted in arriving at their taxable income.
Sentinel Federal's deduction with respect to "qualifying loans," which are
generally loans secured by certain interests in real property, may have been
computed using an amount based on Sentinel Federal's actual loss experience,
or a percentage equal to 8% of Sentinel Federal's taxable income, computed
with certain modifications and reduced by the amount of any permitted
additions to the nonqualifying reserve. Sentinel Federal's deduction with
respect to nonqualifying loans was computed under the experience method, which
essentially allows a deduction based on Sentinel Federal's actual loss
experience over a period of several years. Each year Sentinel Federal selected
the most favorable way to calculate the deduction attributable to an addition
to the tax bad debt reserve. Sentinel Federal used the percentage of taxable
income method bad debt deduction for the taxable years ended December 31,
1995, 1994 and 1993. However, the use of the percentage of taxable income
method for the taxable year ended December 31, 1995 resulted in no bad debt
deduction because of other limitations in the computation.
Recently enacted legislation repealed the reserve method of accounting for
bad debt reserves for tax years beginning after December 31, 1995. As result,
savings associations will no longer be able to calculate their deduction for
bad debts using the percentage of taxable income method. Instead, savings
associations will be required to compute their deduction based on specific
charge-offs during the taxable year or, if the savings association or its
controlled group had assets of less than $500 million, based on actual loss
experience over a period of years. This legislation also requires savings
associations to recapture into income over a six-year period their post-1987
additions to their bad debt tax reserves, thereby generating additional tax
liability. At June 30, 1996, Sentinel Federal's post-1987 reserves totalled
approximately $61,000. The recapture may be suspended for up to two years if,
during those years, the institution satisfies a residential loan requirement.
Sentinel Federal anticipates that it will meet the residential loan
requirement for the taxable year ending December 31, 1996.
Under prior law, if Sentinel Federal failed to satisfy the qualifying thrift
definitional tests in any taxable year, it would be unable to make additions
to its bad debt reserve. Instead, Sentinel Federal would be required to deduct
bad debts as they occur and would additionally be required to recapture its
bad debt reserve deductions ratably over a multi-year period. At June 30,
1996, Sentinel Federal's total bad debt reserve for tax purposes was
approximately $1.9 million. Among other things, the qualifying thrift
definitional tests required Sentinel Federal to hold at least 60% of its
assets as "qualifying assets." Qualifying assets generally include cash,
obligations of the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
certain obligations of a state or political subdivision thereof, loans secured
by interests in improved residential real property or by savings accounts,
student loans and property used by Sentinel Federal in the conduct of its
banking business. Under current law, a savings association will not be
required to recapture its pre-1988 bad debt reserves if it ceases to meet the
qualifying thrift definitional tests.
Distributions. To the extent that Sentinel Federal makes "nondividend
distributions" to Sentinel that are considered as made: (i) from the reserve
for losses on qualifying real property loans, to the extent the reserve for
such losses exceeds the amount that would have been allowed under the
experience method; or (ii) from the supplemental reserve for losses on loans
("Excess Distributions"), then an amount based on the amount distributed will
be included in Sentinel Federal's taxable income. Nondividend distributions
include distributions in excess of Sentinel Federal's current and accumulated
earnings and profits, distributions in redemption of stock,
156
<PAGE>
and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. However, dividends paid
out of Sentinel Federal's current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
calculated for federal income tax purposes, will not be considered to result
in a distribution from Sentinel Federal's bad debt reserve. Thus, any
dividends to Sentinel that would reduce amounts appropriated to Sentinel
Federal's bad debt reserve and deducted for federal income tax purposes would
create a tax liability for Sentinel Federal. The amount of additional taxable
income attributable to an Excess Distribution is an amount that, when reduced
by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the
distribution. Thus, if, Sentinel Federal makes a "nondividend distribution,"
then approximately one and one-half times the amount so used would be
includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 35%
corporate income tax rate (exclusive of state and local taxes). See "--
Limitations on Capital Distributions" for limits on the payment of dividends
by Sentinel Federal. Sentinel Federal does not intend to pay dividends that
would result in a recapture of any portion of its tax bad debt reserve.
Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax. The Code imposes a tax on alternative
minimum taxable income ("AMTI") at a rate of 20%. The excess of the tax bad
debt reserve deduction using the percentage of taxable income method over the
deduction that would have been allowable under the experience method is
treated as a preference item for purposes of computing the AMTI. In addition,
only 90% of AMTI can be offset by net operating loss carryovers. AMTI is
increased by an amount equal to 75% of the amount by which Sentinel Federal's
adjusted current earnings exceeds its AMTI (determined without regard to this
preference and prior to reduction for net operating losses). For taxable years
beginning after December 31, 1986, and before January 1, 1996, an
environmental tax of .12% of the excess of AMTI (with certain modification)
over $2.0 million is imposed on corporations, including Sentinel Federal,
whether or not an Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT") is paid.
Dividends-Received Deduction and Other Matters. Sentinel may exclude from
its income 100% of dividends received from Sentinel Federal as a member of the
same affiliated group of corporations. The corporate dividends-received
deduction is generally 70% in the case of dividends received from unaffiliated
corporations with which Sentinel and Sentinel Federal will not file a
consolidated tax return, except that if Sentinel or Sentinel Federal owns more
than 20% of the stock of a corporation distributing a dividend, then 80% of
any dividends received may be deducted.
Other Federal Tax Matters. Other recent changes in the federal tax system
could also affect the business of Sentinel Federal. These changes include
limitations on the deduction of personal interest paid or accrued by
individual taxpayers, limitations on the deductibility of losses attributable
to investment in certain passive activities and limitations on the
deductibility of contributions to individual retirement accounts. Sentinel
Federal does not believe these changes will have a material effect on its
operations.
There have not been any Internal Revenue Service audits of Sentinel
Federal's Federal income tax returns or audits of Sentinel Federal's state
income tax returns during the past five years.
MISSOURI TAXATION
Missouri-based thrift institutions, such as Sentinel Federal, are subject to
a special financial institutions tax, based on net income without regard to
net operating loss carryforwards, at the rate of 7% of net income. This tax is
in lieu of certain other state taxes on thrift institutions, on their
property, capital or income, except taxes on tangible personal property owned
by Sentinel Federal and held for lease or rental to others and on real estate,
contributions paid pursuant to the Unemployment Compensation Law of Missouri,
social security taxes, sales taxes and use taxes. In addition, Sentinel
Federal is entitled to credit against this tax all taxes paid to the State of
Missouri or any political subdivision except taxes on tangible personal
property owned by Sentinel Federal and held for lease or rental to others and
on real estate, contributions paid pursuant to the Unemployment Compensation
Law of Missouri, social security taxes, sales and use taxes, and taxes imposed
by the Missouri Financial Institutions Tax Law. Missouri thrift institutions
are not subject to the regular state corporate income tax.
157
<PAGE>
Sentinel Federal, along with several other savings and loans located in the
State of Missouri, challenged the constitutionality of the state intangible
tax as applied to savings and loans. In 1981, the Missouri Supreme Court
upheld Sentinel Federal's prior claim to refund the state intangible taxes
paid to the state. The Supreme Court's decision paved the way for Sentinel
Federal to pursue reimbursement of the taxes previously paid totalling
approximately $523,500 including accrued interest on the remaining balance due
from the state. Beginning in the 1987 tax year, Sentinel Federal utilized an
offset against state taxes due to reduce Sentinel Federal's total claim.
According to management, substantially all the offset amount has been utilized
and an estimated total offset of approximately $8,000 remains for future use.
For additional information regarding taxation, see Note 11 of "Financial
Statements of Sentinel Financial Corporation" contained in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
158
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. COMMON STOCK
The Roosevelt Financial Certificate authorizes the issuance by Roosevelt
Financial of up to 90,000,000 shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock (par
value $.01 per share), of which 42,157,516 shares were issued and outstanding
as of October 10, 1996. The Roosevelt Financial Common Stock is quoted on the
Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol "RFED." See "Comparative Stock Prices and
Dividend Information." Roosevelt Financial's stock transfer agent and
registrar is the Harris Trust & Savings Bank.
Each share of the Roosevelt Financial Common Stock has the same relative
rights and is identical in all respects with each other share of the Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock. The Roosevelt Financial Common Stock represents non-
withdrawable capital, is not of an insurable type and is not insured by the
FDIC or any other government agency.
Subject to any prior rights of any preferred stock of Roosevelt Financial
then outstanding, holders of the Roosevelt Financial Common Stock are entitled
to receive such dividends as are declared by the Roosevelt Financial Board out
of funds legally available therefor. Full voting rights are vested in the
holders of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock, each share being entitled to one
vote, subject to the rights of any Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock then
outstanding. The Roosevelt Financial Certificate authorizes the Roosevelt
Financial Board to issue authorized shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock
without stockholder approval. However, Roosevelt Financial Common Stock is
included for quotation on the Nasdaq Stock Market, which requires stockholder
approval of the issuance of additional shares of Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock under certain circumstances. Subject to any prior rights of any such
preferred stock, in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of
Roosevelt Financial, holders of shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock are
entitled to receive pro rata, any assets distributable to stockholders in
respect of shares held by them. Holders of shares of Roosevelt Financial
Common Stock do not have any preemptive rights to subscribe for any additional
securities which may be issued by Roosevelt Financial. The outstanding shares
of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock are fully paid and non-assessable.
Certain provisions of the Roosevelt Financial Certificate may have the
effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Roosevelt
Financial pursuant to an extraordinary corporate transaction involving
Roosevelt Financial, including a merger, reorganization, tender offer,
transfer of substantially all of its assets or a liquidation. See "Certain
Anti-takeover Provisions--Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws."
CERTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS
This section sets forth a brief discussion of the reasons for, and the
operation and effects of, certain provisions of the Roosevelt Financial
Certificate and Bylaws (the "Roosevelt Financial Bylaws") which may have
certain anti-takeover effects. This section also summarizes certain provisions
of federal law and Delaware law which may have anti-takeover effects.
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS
General. A number of provisions of the Roosevelt Financial Certificate and
the Roosevelt Financial Bylaws pertain to matters of corporate governance and
certain rights of stockholders. Certain of those provisions may be deemed to
have and may have the effect of making more difficult, costly or time
consuming, and thereby discouraging, a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or
other attempt to assume control of Roosevelt Financial and/or change incumbent
management and in certain circumstances may prevent a change in control of
Roosevelt Financial even if such a change in control is desired by a majority
of Roosevelt Financial's stockholders. The following discussion focuses on
certain of such provisions.
Authorized Shares of Capital Stock. The Roosevelt Financial Certificate
permits the Roosevelt Financial Board to issue, without the approval of
stockholders but subject to the Board's fiduciary duties and the availability
of authorized but unissued shares, additional shares of Roosevelt Financial
Common Stock, or
159
<PAGE>
additional shares of Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock with such rights and
preferences as the Roosevelt Financial Board may determine. While the
availability of such shares provides Roosevelt Financial with flexibility in
structuring financings and acquisitions and meeting other corporate needs, it
may also, as more fully described below, impede the completion of a
transaction to which the Roosevelt Financial Board or management is opposed.
Uncommitted authorized but unissued shares of Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock and Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time
to such persons and for such consideration as the Roosevelt Financial Board
may determine and holders of the then-outstanding shares of Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock or Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock may or may not
be given the opportunity to vote thereon, depending upon the nature of any
such transactions, applicable law, the rules and policies of the Nasdaq Stock
Market and the judgment of the Roosevelt Financial Board regarding the
submission of such issuance to Roosevelt Financial's stockholders. Roosevelt
Financial stockholders have no preemptive rights to subscribe to newly issued
shares.
Moreover, it is possible that additional shares of Roosevelt Financial
Common Stock or Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock would be issued for the
purpose of making an acquisition by an unwanted suitor of a controlling
interest in Roosevelt Financial more difficult, time-consuming or costly or to
otherwise discourage an attempt to acquire control of Roosevelt Financial.
Under such circumstances, the availability of authorized and unissued shares
of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock and Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock
may make it more difficult for Roosevelt Financial stockholders to obtain a
premium for their shares. Such authorized and unissued shares could be used to
create voting or other impediments or to frustrate a person seeking to obtain
control of Roosevelt Financial through a merger, tender offer, proxy contest
or other means. Such shares could be privately placed with purchasers who
might cooperate with Roosevelt Financial in opposing such an attempt by a
third party to gain control of Roosevelt Financial. The issuance of new shares
of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock or Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock
could also be used to dilute ownership of a person or entity seeking to obtain
control of Roosevelt Financial. Although Roosevelt Financial does not
currently contemplate taking such action, shares of Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock or one or more series of Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock could be
issued for the purposes and effects described above and the Roosevelt
Financial Board reserves its rights (if consistent with its fiduciary
responsibilities) to issue such stock for such purposes.
Classified Board of Directors and Removal of Directors. The Roosevelt
Financial Certificate states that the Roosevelt Financial Board is to be
divided into three classes, which shall be as nearly equal in number as
possible. The directors of Roosevelt Financial in each class hold office for a
term of three years. The Roosevelt Financial Certificate provides that a
director may be removed only for cause and then only by the affirmative vote
of (i) the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled
to vote in an election of directors, voting as a single class and (ii) not
less than a majority of the directors then in office. If less than the entire
Board is to be removed, no one of the directors may be removed if the votes
cast against the removal would be sufficient to elect a director if such votes
were cumulatively voted at an election of the class of directors of which such
director is a part.
A classified board of directors could make it more difficult for
stockholders, including those holding a majority of the outstanding shares, to
force an immediate change in the composition of a majority of the Roosevelt
Financial Board. Since the terms of approximately one-third of the incumbent
directors expire each year, at least two annual elections are necessary for
the stockholders to replace a majority of the board, whereas a majority of a
non-classified board may be replaced in one year.
Management of Roosevelt Financial believes that the staggered election of
directors helps to promote the continuity of management because approximately
one-third of the Roosevelt Financial Board is subject to election each year.
Staggered terms help to assure that in the ordinary course of business
approximately two-thirds of the directors, or more, at any one time have had
at least one year's experience as directors, and moderate the pace of changes
in the Roosevelt Financial Board by extending the minimum time required to
elect a majority of directors from one to two years.
160
<PAGE>
Stockholder Vote Required to Approve Business Combinations with Principal
Stockholders. In connection with certain "Business Combinations" (as defined
below) and related transactions between Roosevelt Financial and a "Related
Person" (as defined below), the Roosevelt Financial Certificate requires the
approval of the holders of at least 75% of Roosevelt Financial's outstanding
shares of voting stock voting as a single class unless the transaction is
approved by the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the directors who are not
affiliated with the Related Person and who were directors at the time the
Related Person became such or unless certain fair price criteria are met. The
Roosevelt Financial Certificate defines the term "Related Person" generally to
include any individual or entity which, together with its "Affiliates" (as
that term is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) owns
beneficially or controls, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the
outstanding shares of voting stock of Roosevelt Financial.
The Roosevelt Financial Certificate defines Business Combination as: (i) any
merger or consolidation of Roosevelt Financial or any of its subsidiaries with
or into any Related Person; (ii) any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge,
transfer, or other disposition other than in the ordinary course of business
to or with a Related Person of any assets of Roosevelt Financial having an
aggregate fair market value of $1,000,000 or more; (iii) the issuance or
transfer by Roosevelt Financial of any shares of its voting stock or
securities convertible into such shares (other than by way of a pro rata
distribution to all stockholders) to a Related Person; (iv) the adoption of
any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of Roosevelt Financial
or any of its subsidiaries proposed, directly or indirectly, by or on behalf
of a Related Person; (v) any recapitalization, merger or consolidation that
would have the effect of increasing the voting power of a Related Person; (vi)
any merger or consolidation of Roosevelt Financial with another person
proposed, directly or indirectly, by or on behalf of a Related Person unless
the surviving or resulting entity has a provision in its governing instrument
which is substantially identical to this provision of the Roosevelt Financial
Certificate; and (vii) any agreement, contract or other arrangement or
understanding providing, directly or indirectly, for any of the transactions
described in this paragraph.
Under Delaware law, absent such a supermajority voting provision, business
combinations, including mergers, consolidations and sales of substantially all
of the assets of Roosevelt Financial must be approved by the vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock, subject to certain exceptions. See "--Delaware Law." The increased
stockholder vote required to approve a Business Combination may have the
effect of foreclosing mergers and other business combinations which a majority
of stockholders deem desirable and may place the power to prevent such a
merger or combination in the hands of a minority of stockholders.
Provisions Relating to Meetings of Stockholders. The Roosevelt Financial
Certificate and Roosevelt Financial Bylaws provide that special meetings of
stockholders may only be called by the chairman of the board or the president
and shall be called by either individual at the written request of a majority
of the directors then in office. The Roosevelt Financial Certificate also
provides that stockholder action may be taken only at a special or an annual
meeting of stockholders and not by written consent. Although management of
Roosevelt Financial believes that these provisions will discourage stockholder
attempts to disrupt the business of Roosevelt Financial between annual
meetings of stockholders, an additional effect may be to deter hostile
takeovers by making it more difficult for a person or entity to obtain
immediate control of Roosevelt Financial between annual meetings. These
provisions may also prevent stockholders from using a special meeting as a
forum to address certain other matters and may discourage takeovers which are
desired by stockholders.
Restriction of Maximum Number of Directors and Filling Vacancies on
Roosevelt Financial's Board of Directors. The Roosevelt Financial Certificate
provides that the number of directors of Roosevelt Financial shall be not less
than six nor more than 18, as set forth in the Roosevelt Financial Bylaws. The
power to fill vacancies, whether occurring by reason of an increase in the
number of directors or by resignation, is vested in the Roosevelt Financial
Board acting by a vote of a majority of directors then in office, even if less
than a quorum. An increase or decrease in the numerical range limitations on
directors of Roosevelt Financial may only be accomplished through an amendment
of the Roosevelt Financial Certificate, which amendment must be
161
<PAGE>
approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then
in office and by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the
total votes eligible to be cast at a meeting duly called for that purpose. An
increase or decrease in the number of directors within the numerical range
limitations prescribed by the Roosevelt Financial Certificate requires an
amendment to the Roosevelt Financial Bylaws, which requires an affirmative
vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office or an affirmative
vote of at least 75% of the outstanding capital stock entitled to vote for
that purpose. The overall effect of such provisions may be to prevent a person
or entity from immediately acquiring control of Roosevelt Financial through an
increase in the number of Roosevelt Financial directors followed by election
of that person's or entity's nominees to fill the newly created vacancies.
Furthermore, the ability of the Roosevelt Financial Board to fill vacancies
resulting from newly created directorships could allow the Board to retain
control of Roosevelt Financial by creating new directorships and filling the
vacancies created thereby.
Advance Notice Requirements for Presentation of New Business and Nominations
of Directors at Meetings of Stockholders. The Roosevelt Financial Bylaws
generally provide that any stockholder desiring to make a proposal for new
business at a meeting of stockholders must submit written notice which must be
received at the executive offices of Roosevelt Financial at least 20 days in
advance of the meeting. The Roosevelt Financial Bylaws also provide that
stockholders wishing to nominate candidates for election as directors must
deliver written notice to the secretary of Roosevelt Financial at least 15
days prior to the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. Adequate advance
notice of stockholder proposals and nominations gives management time to
evaluate such proposals and nominations and to determine whether to recommend
to the stockholders that such proposals be adopted. In certain instances, such
provisions could make it more difficult to oppose management's proposals or
nominations if stockholders believe such proposals or nominations are not in
their best interests.
Supermajority Voting Requirement for Amendment of Certain Provisions of the
Certificate of Incorporation. The Roosevelt Financial Certificate may be
amended only if first approved by two-thirds of the directors then in office
at a duly constituted meeting called expressly for that purpose and thereafter
approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock, except that the provisions of the Roosevelt
Financial Certificate governing (i) Roosevelt Financial's internal affairs,
(ii) call of special meetings, (iii) indemnification, (iv) limitation on the
personal liability of directors, (v) approval for acquisitions of control and
offers to acquire control and (vi) amending the Roosevelt Financial
Certificate must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least 75% of the total votes eligible to be cast on such matters, and the
provisions of the Roosevelt Financial Certificate governing Business
Combinations may be amended, added to, changed or repealed only as provided
for therein. This provision is intended to prevent the holders of less than
75% of the outstanding shares of Roosevelt Financial from circumventing any of
the foregoing provisions by amending the Certificate of Incorporation to
delete or modify any one of such provisions. This provision would enable the
holders of more than 25% of Roosevelt Financial's voting stock to prevent
amendments to the Roosevelt Financial Certificate even if they were favored by
the holders of a majority of the voting stock.
Control Acquisitions. The Roosevelt Financial Certificate provides that, for
as long as Roosevelt Bank remains a majority-owned subsidiary of Roosevelt
Financial, no person shall acquire beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the
voting stock of Roosevelt Financial unless (i) the acquisition received prior
approval, either by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds
of the outstanding voting stock or, if first approved by two-thirds of the
directors then in office at a meeting of the directors called for such
purpose, then by the affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the
outstanding voting stock (in either case at a stockholder meeting called for
such purpose); and (ii) the acquisition received prior approval by the proper
federal regulatory agencies as provided in the Control Act and the Holding
Company Act.
In the event that beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock of
Roosevelt Financial is acquired by any person in violation of the
aforementioned provisions, (i) Roosevelt Financial may institute a private
right of action to enforce the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions
under the Control Act and the Holding Company Act, and (ii) all voting stock
of Roosevelt Financial held by such person in excess of 10% of the
162
<PAGE>
outstanding voting stock of Roosevelt Financial shall no longer, from and
after the date of its acquisition (A) be entitled to vote on any matter, (B)
be entitled to take other stockholder action, (C) be counted in determining
the total outstanding shares of Roosevelt Financial for purposes of any
stockholder action, or (D) be transferable except with the approval of the
Roosevelt Financial Board or of an independent trustee appointed thereby (with
the proceeds of such sale to be paid (x) first, to the trustee, for its
reasonable fees and expenses, (y) second, to the acquiring person to cover its
tax liability upon such sale, and (z) third, to Roosevelt Financial as to any
remaining balance).
This provision would make it impractical for a third party to acquire
beneficial ownership of more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock of
Roosevelt Financial without first receiving stockholder and regulatory
approvals, since any party who acquired shares in excess of the 10% threshold
would lose all significant rights associated with the voting and transfer of
such shares.
FEDERAL LAW
Federal law provides that no person or company, directly or indirectly or
acting in concert with one or more persons or companies, or through one or
more subsidiaries, or through one or more transactions, may acquire "control"
of a savings association (which for these purposes includes a holding company
thereof) at any time without the prior approval of, or, in the case of
individuals, written notice to, the OTS. Any company that acquires such
control becomes a "savings and loan holding company" subject to registration,
examination and regulation as a savings and loan holding company. Control of a
savings association or any other company under federal statute includes,
generally, ownership of, control of or holding irrevocable proxies (or any
combination of irrevocable proxies and voting stock) representing more than
25% of any class of voting stock, control in any manner of the election of a
majority of the savings association's directors, or a determination by the OTS
that the acquiror has the power to direct, or directly or indirectly to
exercise a controlling influence over, the management or policies of the
institution. Among other things, direct or indirect acquisition of more than
10% of any class of a savings association's voting stock, if the acquiror also
is subject to any one of eight "control factors," constitutes a rebuttable
determination of control under the OTS regulations. Such control factors
include, among other things, the acquiror being one of the two largest
stockholders of any class of voting stock. The determination of control may be
rebutted by submission to the OTS, prior to the acquisition of stock or the
occurrence of any other circumstances giving rise to such determination, of a
statement setting forth facts and circumstances which would support a finding
that no control relationship will exist and containing certain undertakings.
Thus, any person or company that intends to acquire more than 25% of the
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock, or that is subject to a "control factor" as
described in the federal regulations and intends to acquire more than 10% of
the Roosevelt Financial Common Stock, may need to notify the OTS and seek
prior approval, non-objection or acceptance of a rebuttal statement.
In applying the "control" test to holders of the Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock, Federal law treats the Roosevelt Financial Series A and Series F
Preferred Stock, which is convertible at any time at the option of the holder
into Roosevelt Financial Common Stock, as Roosevelt Financial Common Stock on
an as-converted basis for purposes of the 10% or 25% limits on voting stock.
Consequently, any person that intends to acquire ownership or control of some
combination of Roosevelt Financial Series A and/or Series F Preferred Stock
and Roosevelt Financial Common Stock, such that the 10% or 25% limits
described above are met, may need to notify the OTS and seek prior approval,
non-objection or acceptance of a rebuttal statement.
The OTS could take the position that the Roosevelt Financial Preferred Stock
constitutes separate classes of voting stock from the Roosevelt Financial
Common Stock in circumstances where and for such periods as the holders have
the right to elect two directors following nonpayment of dividends.
Consequently, any holder of 10% or more of the Roosevelt Financial Series A
and/or Series F Preferred Stock at such time might, if it had a "control
factor" as described above, need to notify the OTS to seek approval, non-
objection or acceptance of a rebuttal statement. Where conversion into voting
stock occurs as the result of the action of a third party not within the
control of the acquiror, OTS regulations provide for the filing of an
application, notice, or rebuttal within 90 days and subject the holder's
exercise of rights associated with that stock to restrictions pending action
by OTS.
163
<PAGE>
DELAWARE LAW
Section 203 of the DGCL may have the effect of significantly delaying a
purchaser's acquisition of the entire equity interest in Roosevelt Financial,
and accordingly, could delay or discourage certain takeover attempts. In
general, Section 203 of the DGCL prevents an "Interested Stockholder" (defined
generally as a person with 15% or more of a corporation's outstanding voting
stock) from engaging in a "Business Combination" (defined to include a variety
of transactions, including mergers, as set forth below) with a Delaware
corporation such as Roosevelt Financial for three years following the date
such person became an Interested Stockholder unless: (i) before such person
became an Interested Stockholder, the board of directors of the corporation
approved either the Business Combination or the transaction in which the
Interested Stockholder became an Interested Stockholder; (ii) upon
consummation of the transaction which resulted in the Interested Stockholder
becoming an Interested Stockholder, the Interested Stockholder owned at least
85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the
transaction commenced (excluding stock owned by directors who are also
officers and employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have
the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan
will be tendered); or (iii) at the time of or following the transaction in
which such person became an Interested Stockholder, the Business Combination
is (A) approved by the board of directors of the corporation and (B)
authorized at a meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of the holders
of 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation not owned by the
Interested Stockholder. The restrictions imposed on Interested Stockholders
under DGCL Section 203 do not apply under certain limited circumstances set
forth therein, including certain Business Combinations proposed by an
Interested Stockholder following the announcement or notification of certain
extraordinary transactions involving the corporation and a person who had not
been an Interested Stockholder during the previous three years or who became
an Interested Stockholder with the approval of a majority of the corporation's
directors.
Section 203 of the DGCL provides that during such three-year period, the
corporation may not merge or consolidate with an Interested Stockholder or any
affiliate or associate thereof, and also may not engage in certain other
transactions with an Interested Stockholder or any affiliate or associate
thereof, including, without limitation, (i) any merger or consolidation of the
corporation or a direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the
corporation with (A) the Interested Stockholder, or (B) with any other
corporation partnership, unincorporated association or other entity if the
merger or consolidation is caused by the Interested Stockholder and as a
result of such merger or consolidation the above limitations of Section 203
are not applicable to the surviving entity; (ii) any sale, lease, exchange,
mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (except proportionately as a
stockholder of the corporation) to or with the Interested Stockholder of
assets having an aggregate market value equal to 10% or more of the aggregate
market value of all assets of the corporation determined on a consolidated
basis or the aggregate market value of all the outstanding stock of a
corporation; (iii) any transaction which results in the issuance or transfer
by the corporation or by any majority owned subsidiary thereof of any stock of
the corporation of such subsidiary to the Interested Stockholder, except,
among other things, pursuant to a transaction which effects a pro rata
distribution to all stockholders of the corporation; (iv) any transaction
involving the corporation or any majority owned subsidiary thereof which has
the effect of increasing the proportionate share of the stock of any class or
series, or securities convertible into the stock of any class or series, of
the corporation or any such subsidiary which is owned by the Interested
Stockholders (except, among other things, as a result of immaterial changes
due to fractional share adjustments); or (v) any receipt by the Interested
Stockholder of the benefit (except proportionately as a stockholder of such
corporation) of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial
benefits provided by or through the corporation.
164
<PAGE>
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
INTRODUCTION
Upon the consummation of the Merger, holders of Sentinel Common Stock, whose
rights are presently governed by Delaware law and Sentinel's certificate of
incorporation and bylaws (the "Sentinel Certificate" and "Sentinel Bylaws,"
respectively) and, indirectly, Sentinel Federal's charter and bylaws, will
become stockholders of Roosevelt, also a Delaware corporation. Accordingly,
their rights will be governed by the DGCL and the certificate of incorporation
and bylaws of Roosevelt (the "Roosevelt Certificate" and "Roosevelt Bylaws,"
respectively) and, indirectly, Roosevelt Bank's charter and bylaws. Certain
differences arise from the differences between the Sentinel Certificate and
Bylaws and the Roosevelt Certificate and Bylaws and between the charter and
bylaws of Sentinel Federal and Roosevelt Bank. The following discussion
summarizes material differences affecting the rights of stockholders but is
not intended to be a complete statement of all differences and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the DGCL, the Roosevelt Certificate and Bylaws,
the Sentinel Certificate and Bylaws and the respective charters and bylaws of
Sentinel Federal and Roosevelt Bank.
Each Sentinel stockholder should carefully consider these differences in
connection with the decision to vote for or against the adoption and approval
of the Merger Agreement.
CAPITAL STOCK
The Sentinel Certificate authorizes the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of
common stock, $.01 par value per share, and 500,000 shares of serial preferred
stock, $.01 par value per share, and provides that the Sentinel Board may
issue such preferred stock in one or more series, may fix the designations,
powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions with
respect to such shares and may specify the number of shares of any such
series, all without stockholder action. As of October 10, 1996 there were a
total of 513,423 shares of Sentinel Common Stock and no shares of Sentinel
preferred stock issued and outstanding.
The Roosevelt Certificate authorizes the issuance of 90,000,000 shares of
common stock, $.01 par value per share, 1,000,000 shares of Class I serial
preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, and 2,000,000 shares of Class II
serial preferred stock, no par value, and provides that the Roosevelt Board
may issue any authorized shares from time to time and may fix the rights and
preferences of the serial preferred stock, all without stockholder action. At
October 10, 1996, there were 42,157,516 shares of Roosevelt Common Stock,
999,100 shares of 6 1/2% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A
(Class I) and 301,000 shares of 6 1/2% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series F (Class II) issued and outstanding.
SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS
The Sentinel Certificate and Sentinel Bylaws provide that special meetings
of stockholders of Sentinel may be called only by a majority of the Sentinel
Board or by a committee of the Sentinel Board which has been duly designated
by the Sentinel Board, upon a resolution adopted by a majority of the Board.
The Roosevelt Certificate and the Roosevelt Bylaws provide that special
meetings of stockholders of Roosevelt may be called only by the chairman of
the board or the president and shall be called by either individual at the
written request of a majority of the directors of Roosevelt then in office.
Such request must state the purpose or purposes of the proposed meeting.
ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR NOMINATIONS OF DIRECTORS AND PRESENTATION OF
NEW BUSINESS AT ANNUAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS
The Sentinel Certificate provides that if a stockholder of Sentinel desires
to make nominations for the election of directors or proposals for new
business at any annual or special meeting of stockholders, he must give notice
in writing to the secretary of Sentinel not less than thirty days nor more
than sixty days prior to any such meeting; provided however, that if less than
31 days' notice of the meeting is given to stockholders, such
165
<PAGE>
written notice by a stockholder must be provided to the secretary of Sentinel
not later than the close of the tenth day following the day on which notice of
the meeting was given to the stockholders. The stockholder's notice with
respect to nominations for elections of directors must include (i) the name,
age, business address and, if known, residence address of each nominee
proposed in such notice, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of each
such nominee, (iii) the number of shares of stock of Sentinel which are
beneficially owned by each such nominee, (iv) such other information required
under the Exchange Act to be disclosed in proxy solicitation materials and (v)
the stockholder's name and address as they appear on Sentinel's books and the
class and a number of shares which are beneficially owned by such stockholder.
A stockholder's notice of a business proposal must set forth (i) a brief
description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and the
reasons therefor, (ii) the name and address, as they appear on Sentinel's
books, of the stockholder proposing such business, (iii) the class and number
of shares which are beneficially owned by the stockholder and (iv) a
disclosure of any material interest of the stockholder in such business.
The Roosevelt Bylaws provide that Roosevelt stockholders may make
nominations for the election of directors by delivering written notice of such
nominations to the secretary of Roosevelt at least 15 days prior to the date
of the annual meeting of stockholders. Furthermore, if the Roosevelt Board
fails to nominate candidates for the board at least 20 days prior to the
annual meeting, then nominations may be made at the meeting by any stockholder
entitled to vote and such nominations shall be voted upon. The Roosevelt
Bylaws generally provide that any stockholder desiring to make a proposal for
new business at the annual meeting of stockholders must submit a written
statement of the proposal which must be received by the secretary of Roosevelt
at least 20 days in advance of the meeting; provided, however, if less than 30
days notice of the date of the meeting is given to stockholders, notice by the
stockholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of
business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date
of the annual meeting was mailed. The stockholder's notice must include a
brief description of the proposal, the stockholder's name and address and the
class and number of shares owned of record by the stockholder. If a
stockholder fails to comply with these advance notice requirements, no action
will be taken on the proposal at the meeting.
NUMBER AND TERM OF DIRECTORS
The Sentinel Certificate provides that the number of directors shall consist
of not less than five nor more than 25 members, as set forth in the Sentinel
Bylaws. The Sentinel Bylaws presently set the number of directors at six
persons. The Roosevelt Certificate provides that the Roosevelt Board shall
consist of not less than six nor more than 18 members, as set forth in the
Roosevelt Bylaws. The Roosevelt Bylaws presently set the number of directors
at ten persons.
The Sentinel Certificate and Sentinel Bylaws and the Roosevelt Certificate
and Roosevelt Bylaws require the Boards of Directors of Sentinel and
Roosevelt, respectively, to be divided into three classes as nearly equal in
number as possible and that the members of each class shall be elected for a
term of three years and until their successors are elected and qualified, with
one class being elected annually.
REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS
The DGCL provides that directors serving on a classified board may be
removed only for cause unless the corporation's charter provides otherwise.
The Sentinel Certificate provides that the entire Sentinel Board, or any
individual director or directors, may be removed, but only for cause, by the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote generally in an election of directors. Under the Roosevelt
Certificate, a member of the Roosevelt Board may be removed, but only for
cause as defined under OTS regulations, by the affirmative vote of (i) not
less than a majority of the directors then in office and (ii) the holders of
not less than a majority of the then outstanding shares of capital stock
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting as a single
class. If less than the entire Roosevelt Board is to be removed, no individual
director may be removed from office if the votes cast against the removal
would be sufficient to elect a director if the shares were cumulatively voted
at an election for the class of directors of which such director is a part.
166
<PAGE>
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS WITH CERTAIN PERSONS
The Sentinel Certificate provides that the affirmative vote of 80% of the
total outstanding shares of voting stock of Sentinel is required to approve
any of the following transactions, each of which is deemed a "Business
Combination" under the Sentinel Certificate: (i) any merger or consolidation
of Sentinel or any subsidiary thereof with a Related Person (generally any
person or entity controlling more than 10% of the outstanding shares of the
common stock of Sentinel or any affiliate of such person or entity); (ii) any
sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition to a
Related Person of all or any substantial part (generally more than 25%) of the
assets of Sentinel; (iii) any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge,
transfer or other disposition to Sentinel or any subsidiary thereof of all or
any substantial part of the assets of a Related Person; (iv) the issuance of
any securities of Sentinel or any subsidiary thereof to any Related Person;
(v) the acquisition by Sentinel or any subsidiary thereof of any securities of
a Related Person; (vi) any reclassification of or involving the common stock
of Sentinel; or (vii) any agreement, contract or other arrangement providing
for any of the transactions described above. The supermajority voting
provision will become inapplicable if the Business Combination is approved by
a two-thirds vote of the Continuing Directors (generally those directors who
are unaffiliated with the Related Person and were members of the Board prior
to the time the Related Person became a Related Person).
In connection with certain "Business Combinations" (as defined below) and
related transactions between Roosevelt and a "Related Person" (generally any
person or entity who, together with affiliates, controls 10% or more of the
outstanding shares of voting stock of Roosevelt), the Roosevelt Certificate
requires the approval of the holders of at least 75% of Roosevelt's
outstanding shares of voting stock voting as a single class unless the
transaction is approved by the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the
directors who are not affiliated with the Related Person and who were
directors at the time the Related Person became a Related Person unless
certain fair price criteria are met. The Roosevelt Certificate defines
"Business Combination" as: (i) any merger or consolidation of Roosevelt or any
of its subsidiaries with or into any Related Person; (ii) any sale, lease,
exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer, or other disposition other than in the
ordinary course of business to or with a Related Person of any assets of
Roosevelt having an aggregate fair market value of $1,000,000 or more; (iii)
the issuance or transfer by Roosevelt of any shares of its voting stock or
securities convertible into such shares (other than by way of a pro rata
distribution to all stockholders) to a Related Person; (iv) the adoption of
any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of Roosevelt or any of
its subsidiaries proposed, directly or indirectly, by or on behalf of a
Related Person; (v) any recapitalization, merger or consolidation that would
have the effect of increasing the voting power of a Related Person; (vi) any
merger or consolidation of Roosevelt with another person proposed, directly or
indirectly, by or on behalf of a Related Person unless the surviving or
resulting entity has a provision in its governing instrument which is
substantially identical to this provision of the Roosevelt Certificate; and
(vii) any agreement, contract or other arrangement or understanding providing,
directly or indirectly, for any of the transactions described in this
paragraph.
AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS
The DGCL provides that the certificate of incorporation of a Delaware
corporation may be amended only if first approved by the corporation's board
of directors and thereafter by a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to
vote thereon, and, if applicable, a majority of each class of shares entitled
to vote thereon as a class. The Sentinel Certificate states that Sentinel
reserves the right to amend or repeal any provision in the Sentinel
Certificate as provided by Delaware law, and that any rights given to
stockholders therein are granted subject to this reservation. Notwithstanding
such reservation, the Sentinel Certificate requires the affirmative vote of
the holders of at least 80% of the total votes eligible to be cast by Sentinel
stockholders for approval of any amendment of provisions set forth in the
Sentinel Certificate governing (i) action without a meeting of stockholders,
(ii) the calling of special meetings of stockholders, (iii) notice for
nomination for elections of directors and proposals for business, (iv) the
number of members of, vacancies on and structure of the Sentinel Board (v)
removal of directors, (vi) certain acquisitions of the capital stock of
Sentinel, (vii) the approval of certain business combinations with principal
stockholders and the evaluation of business combinations generally, (viii)
indemnification of directors, officers, employees and certain agents of
Sentinel, (ix) elimination of directors' liability, (x) amendment of the
Sentinel Bylaws and (xi) amendment of the Sentinel Certificate.
167
<PAGE>
The Roosevelt Certificate may be amended only if first approved by two-
thirds of the directors then in office at a duly constituted meeting called
expressly for that purpose and if thereafter approved by the affirmative vote
of a majority of the total votes eligible to be cast at a duly constituted
meeting of stockholders called expressly for that purpose, except that the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the total votes eligible to
be cast at such meeting shall be required to amend, add to, change or repeal
the provisions of the Roosevelt Certificate governing (i) Roosevelt's internal
affairs, (ii) the calling of special meetings of stockholders, (iii)
indemnification, (iv) limitation on the personal liability of directors, (v)
approval for acquisitions of control and offers to acquire control, and (vi)
amendment of the Roosevelt Certificate, and that the provisions of the
Roosevelt Certificate governing Business Combinations may be amended, added
to, changed or repealed only as set forth therein.
The Sentinel Certificate provides that the Sentinel Bylaws may be amended or
repealed by either the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the Sentinel
Board or by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the stock
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. The Roosevelt
Certificate provides that the Roosevelt Bylaws may be amended or repealed by a
two-thirds vote of the entire Roosevelt Board then in office at a meeting
called expressly for such purpose or by the holders of at least 75% of the
outstanding capital stock of Roosevelt entitled to vote thereon at a meeting
called expressly for such purpose.
CONTROL SHARE ACQUISITIONS
The Sentinel Certificate provides that, with certain exceptions, for a
period of five years from the effective date of the mutual-to-stock conversion
of Sentinel Federal, no person may directly or indirectly offer to acquire or
acquire beneficial ownership of more than 10% of any class of stock of
Sentinel, unless such offer or acquisition has been approved in advance by a
two-thirds vote of the Continuing Directors. If such provision is violated,
the securities in excess of the 10% limit may not be voted or counted as
shares entitled to vote.
In addition, the Sentinel Certificate provides that if, any time after five
years from the effective date of the conversion of Sentinel Federal, any
person acquires the beneficial ownership of more than 10% of any class of
stock of Sentinel, without the prior approval by a two-thirds vote of the
Continuing Directors, then with respect to each vote in excess of 10% of the
outstanding voting power of such stock, the acquiring person shall be entitled
to cast only one-hundredth of a vote.
The Roosevelt Certificate provides that, for as long as Roosevelt Bank
remains a majority-owned subsidiary of Roosevelt, no person shall acquire
beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock of Roosevelt unless
(i) the acquisition received prior approval, either by the affirmative vote of
the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock or, if
first approved by two-thirds of the directors then in office at a meeting of
the directors called for such purpose, then by the affirmative vote of holders
of at least a majority of the outstanding voting stock (in either case at a
stockholder meeting called for such purpose); and (ii) the acquisition
received prior approval by the proper federal regulatory agencies as provided
under federal law.
In the event that beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock of
Roosevelt is acquired by any person in violation of the aforementioned
provisions, (i) Roosevelt may institute a private right of action to enforce
the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions under federal law, and (ii)
all voting stock of Roosevelt held by such person in excess of 10% of the
outstanding voting stock of Roosevelt shall no longer, from and after the date
of its acquisition (A) be entitled to vote on any matter, (B) be entitled to
take other stockholder action, (C) be counted in determining the total
outstanding shares of Roosevelt for purposes of any stockholder action, or (D)
be transferable except with the approval of the Roosevelt Board or of an
independent trustee appointed thereby (with the proceeds of such sale to be
paid (x) first, to the trustee, for its reasonable fees and expenses, (y)
second, to the acquiring person to cover its tax liability upon such sale, and
(z) third, to Roosevelt as to any remaining balance).
168
<PAGE>
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of Roosevelt Common Stock offered hereby will be
passed upon for Roosevelt by Silver, Freedman & Taff, L.L.P. (a limited
liability partnership including professional corporations), Washington, D.C.
Certain other legal matters in connection with the Merger will be passed upon
for Roosevelt by Silver, Freedman & Taff, L.L.P., and for Sentinel by Breyer &
Aguggia, Washington, D.C.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Roosevelt as of December 31, 1995
and 1994, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1995, included in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus have been audited by
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent certified public accountants, as stated in
their report appearing herein (which report expresses an unqualified opinion),
and have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Sentinel as of June 30, 1996 and
1995, and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1996,
included in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report appearing herein
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory
paragraphs referring to the operation of Sentinel Federal under a Supervisory
Agreement with the OTS and changes in methods of accounting for certain
investments in debt and equity securities during the year ended June 30, 1995
and income taxes during the year ended June 30, 1994 and to Sentinel's
entering into the Merger Agreement), and have been so included in reliance
upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Sentinel will hold a 1996 Annual Meeting of Stockholders only if the Merger
is not consummated before the time of such meeting. In such event, as
disclosed in the proxy materials for Sentinel's 1995 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, in order to be eligible for inclusion in Sentinel's proxy
materials for the 1996 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, any stockholder
proposal to take action at such meeting must have been received at the main
office of Sentinel, 1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106, no later
than May 31, 1996. However, if such 1996 Annual Meeting is held after late-
October 1996, any stockholder proposal must be received by Sentinel a
reasonable time before the solicitation of proxies for such Annual Meeting is
made. Any such proposal shall be subject to the requirements of the proxy
rules adopted under the Exchange Act.
As disclosed in the proxy materials for Roosevelt's 1996 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, in order to be eligible for inclusion in Roosevelt's proxy
materials for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, any stockholder
proposal to take action at such meeting must be received at the main office of
Roosevelt, 900 Roosevelt Parkway, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, no later than
November 26, 1996. Any such proposal shall be subject to the requirements of
the proxy rules adopted under the Exchange Act.
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Sentinel's independent
accountants, are expected to be present at the Special Meeting. They will be
afforded the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are
expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
169
<PAGE>
OTHER MATTERS
The Sentinel Board is not aware of any business to come before the Special
Meeting other than those matters described above in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus. However, if any other matter should properly come before
the Special Meeting, it is intended that holders of the proxies will act in
accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Directors
of Sentinel Financial Corporation
/s/ John C. Spencer
John C. Spencer
Secretary
170
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page Number
-----------
<S> <C>
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994 AND 1993
Independent Auditors' Report of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP (January 16, 1996,
except for Note 15 as to which the date is September 6, 1996)....................................... RF-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets at the Years Ended December 31, 1995 and 1994............................. RF-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993............ RF-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993.................................................................... RF-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31 1995, 1994 and 1993............. RF-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993....... RF-7
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR
THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 1996 (unaudited) and December 31, 1995........................ RF-36
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 1996 and 1995 (unaudited).................................................................. RF-37
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 1996 and 1995 (unaudited).................................................................. RF-39
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1996
and 1995 (unaudited)................................................................................ RF-41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 1996 (unaudited)........................................................................... RF-43
</TABLE>
RF-A
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.
Chesterfield, Missouri:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Roosevelt
Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 1995 and
1994, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1995. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Roosevelt Financial
Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, as of
December 31, 1993, the Company changed its method of accounting for certain
investments in debt securities to conform with the Financial Accounting
Standards Board's Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115,
"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities."
We have also audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the supplemental fair value consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of
December 31, 1995 and 1994. As described in Note 3, the supplemental fair value
consolidated balance sheets have been prepared by management to present relevant
financial information that is not provided by the historical cost consolidated
balance sheets and is not intended to be a presentation in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the supplemental fair
value consolidated balance sheets do not purport to present the net realizable,
liquidation, or market value of the Company as a whole. Furthermore, amounts
ultimately realized by the Company from the disposal of assets may vary
significantly from the fair values presented. In our opinion, the supplemental
fair value consolidated balance sheets referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
As described in Note 15, the Consolidated Financial Statements have been
restated.
/S/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
January 16, 1996, except for
Note 15 as to which the date
is September 6, 1996
RF-1
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------------------------
1995 1994
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents........................................ $ 15,433 $ 22,106
Securities available for sale:
Investment securities.......................................... 159,857 109,136
Mortgage-backed securities..................................... 1,446,604 1,656,563
Securities held to maturity:
Investment securities.......................................... 119,186 156,773
Mortgage-backed securities..................................... 3,430,954 3,119,289
Loans............................................................ 3,577,892 3,072,151
Real estate owned................................................ 15,433 15,315
Office properties and equipment, net............................. 52,466 53,483
Other assets..................................................... 195,236 227,050
--------- ---------
$ 9,013,061 $ 8,431,866
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits......................................................... $ 4,907,497 $ 4,899,389
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase................... 1,082,814 1,208,127
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank............................. 2,377,138 1,707,938
Other borrowings................................................. 47,523 47,384
Other liabilities................................................ 101,183 127,402
--------- ---------
Total liabilities......................................... 8,516,155 7,990,240
--------- ---------
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock - $.01 par value, $50 preference value, 6.5%
non-cumulative perpetual convertible; aggregate preference
value of $65,050 and $69,950 at December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively, 3,000,000 shares authorized and 1,301,000 and
1,319,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
1995 and 1994, respectively.................................. 13 13
Common stock - $.01 par value; 90,000,000 shares authorized;
41,991,701 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
1995 and 40,173,527 shares and 40,163,527 shares issued
and outstanding, respectively, at December 31, 1994.......... 420 402
Paid-in capital................................................ 262,381 255,655
Retained earnings - subject to certain restrictions............ 223,606 209,379
Treasury stock, at cost; 10,000 shares at December 31, 1994.... -- (150)
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale,
net of taxes................................................. 12,019 (23,673)
Unamortized restricted stock awards............................ (1,533) --
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity................................ 496,906 441,626
--------- ---------
$ 9,013,061 $ 8,431,866
========= =========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RF-2
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except per share information)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Loans....................................................................... $252,071 $206,467 $207,841
Securities available for sale............................................... 135,444 137,933 47,074
Securities held to maturity................................................. 259,262 179,168 205,706
Securities held for trading................................................. -- 6,460 19,522
Other....................................................................... 1,018 3,258 6,797
------- ------- -------
Total interest income.................................................... 647,795 533,286 486,940
------- ------- -------
Interest expense:
Deposits.................................................................... 233,836 200,190 192,605
Other borrowings............................................................ 223,508 138,915 96,911
Interest rate exchange agreements, net...................................... 9,089 8,469 31,974
------- ------- -------
Total interest expense................................................. 466,433 347,574 321,490
------- ------- -------
Net interest income.................................................. 181,362 185,712 165,450
Provision for losses on loans................................................. 1,200 12,432 706
------- ------- -------
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans.............. 180,162 173,280 164,744
------- ------- -------
Noninterest income (loss):
Retail banking fees......................................................... 10,706 8,682 6,260
Insurance and brokerage sales commissions................................... 7,506 6,538 5,737
Loan servicing fees (expenses), net......................................... 7,401 7,359 (11,145)
Net gain (loss) from financial instruments.................................. (58,216) (10,660) 10,646
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for development and sale.............. 1,656 3,414 746
Gain on sale of loan servicing rights....................................... 1,510 -- --
Unrealized losses on impairment of mortgage-backed securities............... (27,063) -- --
Other....................................................................... 1,360 1,923 2,013
------- ------- -------
Total noninterest income (loss)......................................... (55,140) 17,256 14,257
------- -------- -------
Noninterest expense:
General and administrative:
Compensation and employee benefits........................................ 34,780 42,570 38,970
Occupancy................................................................. 18,758 23,939 17,385
Federal deposit insurance premiums........................................ 11,743 12,018 9,896
Other..................................................................... 22,385 32,468 24,857
------- ------- -------
Total general and administrative........................................ 87,666 110,995 91,108
Provision for real estate losses............................................ -- 4,581 4,238
Litigation settlements...................................................... -- -- 3,252
------ ------- ------
Total noninterest expense............................................... 87,666 115,576 98,598
------ -------- ------
Income before income tax expense, extraordinary item,
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle............. 37,356 74,960 80,403
Income tax expense............................................................ 10,258 25,384 27,134
------ ------ ------
Income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle................................... 27,098 49,576 53,269
Extraordinary item, net of income tax effect.................................. -- (7,849) (1,908)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle........................... -- -- (6,489)
------ ------ ------
Net income........................................................... $ 27,098 $ 41,727 $ 44,872
====== ====== ======
Net income attributable to common stock.............................. $ 22,855 $ 36,543 $ 41,057
====== ====== ======
Per share data:
Primary earnings per share:
Income before extraordinary item and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle................................ $ .56 $ 1.17 $ 1.54
Extraordinary item, net of income tax effect.............................. -- (0.21) (0.06)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle....................... -- -- (0.20)
----- ----- -----
Net income........................................................... $ .56 $ .96 $ 1.28
===== ===== =====
Fully diluted earnings per share:
Income before extraordinary item and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle................................ $ .56 $ 1.17 $ 1.32
Extraordinary item, net of income tax effect.............................. -- (.21) (0.05)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle....................... -- -- (0.16)
----- ----- -----
Net income........................................................... $ .56 $ .96 $ 1.11
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RF-3
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994, AND 1993
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Preferred stock Common stock Paid-in Retained
------------------------ ---------------------- ----------- ------------
Shares Amount Shares Amount capital earnings
----------- --------- ---------- -------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1992. 1,526,049 $ 15 8,823,507 $ 88 $ 135,084 $ 153,424
Net income (including pooled company)............. -- -- -- -- -- 44,872
Issuance of 920,000 shares of 6.5%
non-cumulative perpetual
convertible preferred stock..................... 920,000 9 -- -- 44,176 --
Exchange of common stock for preferred stock...... 80,000 1 (119,025) (1) (28) --
Exercise of incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options...................... -- -- 72,775 1 649 --
Amortization of restricted stock awards........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Cash dividends declared (including
pooled company):
Common stock.................................. -- -- -- -- -- (7,686)
Preferred stock............................... -- -- -- -- -- (3,815)
Unrealized gain on securities available
for sale, net (including pooled company)........ -- -- -- -- -- --
Other pre-merger transactions of
pooled company................................... (33,609) -- 1,514,665 15 98 (15)
----------- --------- ---------- -------- ----------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1993........................ 2,492,440 25 10,291,922 103 179,979 186,780
Net income (including pooled company)............. -- -- -- -- -- 41,727
Issuance of 319,000 shares of 6.5%
non-cumulative perpetual convertible
preferred stock................................ 319,000 3 -- -- 21,270 --
Issuance of common stock
in the acquisition of Home Federal
Bancorp of Missouri, Inc......................... -- -- 1,121,142 11 48,220 --
Issuance of common stock through stock
options and employee stock plans................. -- -- 1,294,991 13 5,932 --
Three-for-one stock split.. -- -- 25,157,436 252 (252) --
Cash dividends declared (including
pooled company):
Common stock.................................. -- -- -- -- -- (13,944)
Preferred stock............................... -- -- -- -- -- (5,184)
Purchase of common stock
for treasury..................................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Unrealized loss on securities available
for sale, net (including pooled company......... -- -- -- -- -- --
Other pre-merger transactions of
pooled company.................................... (1,492,440) (15) 2,308,036 23 506 --
----------- --------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1994........................ 1,319,000 13 40,173,527 402 255,655 209,379
Net income........................................ -- -- -- -- -- 27,098
Purchase of common stock for treasury............. -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock through stock
options and employee stock plans................ -- -- 243,763 3 1,531 (1,572)
Issuance of common stock in the acquisition of
Kirksville Bancshares, Inc...................... -- -- 1,521,435 15 5,426 15,475
Exchange of preferred stock for common stock...... (18,000) -- 52,976 -- (231) --
Amortization of restricted stock awards........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock.................................... -- -- -- -- -- (22,531)
Preferred stock................................. -- -- -- -- -- (4,243)
Unrealized gain on securities available
for sale, net.................................... -- -- -- -- -- --
----------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1995........................ 1,301,000 $ 13 41,991,701 $ 420 $ 262,381 $ 223,606
========== ======== ========== ======== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unrealized
gain (loss) on
securities
available for Unamortized Total
Treasury stock sale, net restricted stockholders'
-------------------------- ----------- -------------- --------------
Shares Amount of taxes stock awards equity
--------- ---------- ------------ -------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1992............................. -- $ -- $ -- $ (66) $ 288,545
Net income (including pooled company).................. -- -- -- -- 44,872
Issuance of 920,000 shares of 6.5% non-cumulative
perpetual convertible preferred stock................. -- -- -- -- 44,185
Exchange of common stock for preferred stock........... -- -- -- -- (28)
Exercise of incentive stock options and non-qualified
stock options......................................... -- -- -- -- 650
Amortization of restricted stock awards................ -- -- -- 66 66
Cash dividends declared (including pooled company):
Common stock....................................... -- -- -- -- (7,686)
Preferred stock.................................... -- -- -- -- (3,815)
Unrealized gain on securities available
for sale, net (including pooled company)............. -- -- 11,575 -- 11,575
Other pre-merger transactions of pooled company........ -- -- -- -- 98
--------- ------- -------- --------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1993............................. -- -- 11,575 -- 378,462
Net income (including pooled company).................. -- -- -- -- 41,727
Issuance of 319,000 shares of 6.5% non-cumulative
perpetual convertible preferred stock................ -- -- -- -- 21,273
Issuance of common stock in the acquisition of
Home Federal Bancorp of Missouri, Inc................ -- -- -- -- 48,231
Issuance of common stock through stock options and
employee stock plans................................. -- -- -- -- 5,945
Three-for-one stock split.............................. -- -- -- -- --
Cash dividends declared (including pooled company):
Common stock....................................... -- -- -- -- (13,944)
Preferred stock.................................... -- -- -- -- (5,184)
Purchase of common stock for treasury.................. (10,000) (150) -- -- (150)
Unrealized loss on securities available
for sale, net (including pooled company)............. -- -- (35,248) -- (35,248)
Other pre-merger transactions of pooled company........ -- -- -- -- 514
--------- ------- -------- --------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1994............................. (10,000) (150) (23,673) -- 441,626
Net income............................................. -- -- -- -- 27,098
Purchase of common stock for treasury.................. (214,500) (3,426) -- -- (3,426)
Issuance of common stock through stock options and
employee stock plans................................. 209,976 3,345 -- (1,621) 1,686
Issuance of common stock in the acquisition of
Kirksville Bancshares, Inc............................ -- -- -- -- 20,916
Exchange of preferred stock for common stock........... 14,524 231 -- -- --
Amortization of restricted stock awards................ -- -- -- 88 88
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock......................................... -- -- -- -- (22,531)
Preferred stock...................................... -- -- -- -- (4,243)
Unrealized gain on securities available for
sale, net............................................. -- -- 35,692 -- 35,692
--------- ------- -------- --------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1995............................. -- $ -- $ 12,019 $ (1,533) $ 496,906
========= ======= ======== ========= ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RF-4
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income................................................................... $ 27,098 $ 41,727 $ 44,872
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt........................ -- 12,165 2,963
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle....................... -- -- 9,831
Depreciation and amortization............................................. 4,294 5,814 4,260
Amortization of discounts and premiums, net............................... 9,900 16,383 23,463
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable........................ (7,645) (2,310) 2,401
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable........................... 11,119 (1,023) (3,943)
Provision for losses on loans and real estate............................. 1,200 17,013 4,944
Unrealized losses on impairment of mortgage-backed securities............. 27,063 -- --
(Increase) decrease in securities held for trading, net................... -- (87,138) 28,729
Decrease in securities held for sale, net................................. -- -- 58,688
Decrease (increase) in loans receivable held for sale, net................ -- 86,579 (59,536)
Decrease in outstanding checks, net....................................... -- -- (37,416)
Other, net................................................................ (31,514) 18,358 (27,400)
------------ ------------ -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities................................ 41,515 107,568 51,856
------------ ------------ -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Principal payments and maturities of securities available for sale.......... 126,291 313,775 --
Principal payments and maturities of securities held to maturity............ 835,059 783,067 917,679
Principal payments on loans................................................. 699,307 727,348 1,191,068
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale........................ 945,941 2,633,590 --
Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity.......................... -- -- 25,021
Proceeds from sales of loans................................................ -- -- 34,447
Purchase of securities available for sale................................... (737,735) (2,905,255) --
Purchase of securities held to maturity..................................... (1,234,320) (1,385,293) (2,336,020)
Purchase of loans........................................................... (321,097) (146,772) (684,807)
Originations of loans....................................................... (688,576) (680,794) (783,211)
Fees paid for interest rate cap and floor agreements available for sale..... -- (20,638) --
Net proceeds from sales of real estate...................................... 10,889 9,253 22,771
Purchase of office properties and equipment................................. (2,402) (7,556) (10,005)
Sale (purchase) of purchased mortgage servicing rights, net................. 3,971 -- (14,660)
Cash and cash equivalents from acquisition, net of cash paid................ (19,201) 31,087 1,401,792
Payments on sales or exchanges of branch deposits, net...................... -- (67,337) (206,405)
Proceeds from sale of loan production facilities............................ -- 75,150 --
------------ ------------ -----------
Net cash used in investing activities.................................... (381,873) (640,375) (442,330)
------------ ------------ -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of mortgage-backed bonds.......................................... -- (60,820) (521)
Repayment of FHLB advances.................................................. -- (100,980) --
Redemption of subordinated notes............................................ -- (31,022) --
Proceeds from FHLB advances................................................. 15,513,000 14,551,256 4,142,700
Principal payments on FHLB advances......................................... (14,851,000) (14,015,000) (3,285,700)
Fees paid for interest rate cap and floor agreements........................ -- (14,440) (39,023)
Excess of deposit withdrawals over receipts................................. (173,894) (578,888) (437,748)
(Decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, net.. (125,313) 617,726 (59,571)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock................................... -- 21,273 44,185
Proceeds from exercise of stock options..................................... 1,107 6,459 748
Purchase of treasury stock.................................................. (3,426) (150) --
Cash dividends paid......................................................... (26,789) (18,056) (11,501)
------------ ------------ -----------
Net cash provided by financing activities................................. 333,685 377,358 353,569
------------ ------------ -----------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents.................................... (6,673) (155,449) (36,905)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year............................... 22,106 177,555 214,460
------------ ------------ -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year..................................... $ 15,433 $ 22,106 $ 177,555
============ ============ ===========
</TABLE>
RF-5
<PAGE>
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES RELATED TO THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
The Company paid interest of $455.3 million, $348.6 million, and $325.4 million
during 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. The Company paid income taxes of
$37.1 million, $6.5 million, and $10.9 million during 1995, 1994, and 1993,
respectively.
Cash and cash equivalents obtained from acquisitions, net of cash paid, are
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fair value of assets purchased.............................................. $ (98,763) $ (556,990) $ (34,560)
Liabilities assumed......................................................... 73,731 491,755 1,436,352
Issuance of common stock.................................................... -- 48,231 --
-------- --------- ----------
Cash (paid) received from acquisition....................................... (25,032) (17,004) 1,401,792
Cash and cash equivalents acquired.......................................... 5,831 48,091 --
-------- --------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents from acquisition,
net of cash paid........................................................... $ (19,201) $ 31,087 $ 1,401,792
======== ========= ==========
</TABLE>
Noncash investing and financing activities are summarized below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Noncash transfers from securities held for trading to:
Securities available for sale.............................................. $ -- $ 242,429 $ --
Securities held for sale................................................... -- -- 221,760
Noncash transfers from securities available for
sale to securities held to maturity........................................ -- 107,318 --
Noncash transfers from securities held for
sale to securities available for sale...................................... -- -- 744,962
Noncash transfers from securities held to maturity to
securities available for sale.............................................. 85,165 26,368 830,172
Desecuritization resulting in transfer of mortgage-backed
securities held to maturity to loans and real estate owned................. 33,603 -- --
Redesignation of interest rate swap to securities available for sale........ 4,369 -- --
Defeasance of mortgage-backed bonds......................................... -- -- 72,375
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RF-6
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994, AND 1993
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Roosevelt
Financial Group, Inc. (the Company); its two wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Roosevelt Bank (the Bank) and F & H Realty (Realty), a Missouri-chartered real
estate investment company; and the Bank's wholly owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1994 and 1993
consolidated financial statements to conform to the 1995 presentation. Results
of operations of companies acquired and accounted for as purchases are included
from their respective dates of acquisition. When acquired in a pooling of
interests transaction, current and prior period financial statements are
restated to include the accounts of the acquired companies, if significant.
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities
Effective December 31,1993, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities" (SFAS 115). This statement requires investments in debt and
equity securities to be segregated into the following three categories: trading,
held to maturity, and available for sale.
Trading securities are purchased and held principally for the purpose of
reselling them within a short period of time. Their unrealized gains and losses
are included in earnings.
Securities classified as held to maturity are accounted for at cost, adjusted
for the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts which are recognized
in interest income over the period to maturity for investment securities, or the
estimated life of mortgage-backed securities using the level-yield method,
because the Company has both the intent and the ability to hold such securities
to maturity. Unrealized losses in the debt securities portfolio are recognized
if any market valuation differences are deemed to be other than temporary.
Securities not classified as either trading or held to maturity are considered
to be available for sale. Gains and losses realized on the sale of these
securities are based on the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and
losses on available for sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported
as a net amount in a separate component of stockholders' equity until realized.
Unrealized losses on all debt securities are recognized if any market valuation
differences are deemed to be other than temporary.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to reduce its exposure to
interest rate risk. These instruments include interest rate exchange agreements,
interest rate cap and floor agreements, and to a much lesser extent, interest
rate collar agreements and financial futures contracts, including options on
such futures contracts. The interest rate exchange agreements and the interest
rate cap and floor agreements have the effect of changing the interest rate
characteristics of the assets or liabilities to which they are designated. The
financial futures contracts
RF-7
<PAGE>
are entered into to achieve a position whereby the estimated exposure of a
certain position to interest rate movements is offset by approximately equal,
but opposite, results in the financial futures contracts.
Interest rate exchange agreements, interest rate cap, floor and collar
agreements and financial futures contracts are designated against either
securities available for sale or short-term borrowings or deposits. Agreements
or contracts designated against securities available for sale are included at
their market value in the securities available for sale portfolio. Any mark to
market adjustments are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity,
net of tax. The changes in market value of such agreements or contracts
designated against short term borrowings or deposits are not reported on the
consolidated balance sheets.
The interest differential paid or received on interest rate exchange agreements
is recorded as a component of interest expense, net. The purchase premium of
interest rate cap, floor, and collar agreements is capitalized and amortized on
a straight line basis over the original term of the respective agreement. No
purchase premium is paid at the time an interest rate exchange agreement is
entered into. Gains and losses from terminated interest rate exchange agreements
and interest rate cap, floor and collar agreements are recognized, consistent
with the gain or loss on the asset or liability it is designated against. Where
the asset or liability was not sold or paid off, the gains or losses are
deferred and amortized on a straight line basis as an increase or decrease to
expense over the original term of the agreements or the remaining life of the
asset or liability, whichever is less.
Gains or losses on financial futures contracts which qualify as hedges are
deferred. The unamortized balance of such deferred gains or losses is applied to
the carrying value of the hedged items. Amortization of the net deferred gains
or losses is applied to the interest component of the hedged items using the
level-yield method. Gains or losses in the market value of financial futures
contracts which do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized currently.
Loans
Loans are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred loan fees,
allowance for losses, and any discounts or premiums on purchased loans. The
deferred fees, discounts, and premiums are amortized using the level-yield
method over the estimated life of the loan.
Generally, a loan is classified as nonaccrual and the accrual of interest on
such loan is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest
has become more than 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about
further collectibility of principal or interest, even though the loan is
currently performing. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, accrued but
unpaid interest is reversed. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status
when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the
contractual terms for a reasonable period of time, and the ultimate
collectibility of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in
doubt.
Effective January 1, 1995, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan", as
amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 118, "Accounting by
Creditors for Impairment of a Loan - Income Recognition and Disclosures"
(collectively SFAS 114). SFAS 114 addresses the accounting by creditors for
impairment of certain loans by specifying how the allowance for loan losses
related to such loans should be determined. As SFAS 114 does not apply to
residential mortgage and consumer loans which are collectively evaluated for
impairment and represent in excess of 95% of the Company's total loan portfolio,
the initial and continuing application of SFAS 114 has had no significant impact
on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Relative to the Company's
commercial real estate loan portfolio, a loan is considered to be impaired when
it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according
to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based on
the underlying value of the collateral.
RF-8
<PAGE>
Loans Serviced for Others
Servicing fees related to loans serviced for others are recognized when loan
payments are received. Ancillary income from loan servicing is recorded when
received. Operational costs to service such loans are charged to expense as
incurred and are included in general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The costs of purchased mortgage servicing rights are capitalized and are
amortized over the estimated remaining lives of the underlying loans using the
level-yield method. The carrying value of purchased mortgage servicing rights is
periodically evaluated in relation to estimated future servicing revenues.
Amortization of purchased mortgage servicing rights is recorded as a component
of "Loan servicing fees (expenses), net" in the consolidated statements of
operations.
During May 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No.122, "Accounting for Mortgage Servicing
Rights" (SFAS 122). SFAS 122 requires that an institution which sells or
securitizes loans it has originated or purchased, and maintains the servicing
rights, to capitalize the cost of the rights to service such loans. As the
Company is not currently selling or securitizing any loans that it has
originated or purchased, the aforementioned provision of SFAS 122 will not have
any impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. SFAS 122 also
requires that an enterprise assess its capitalized mortgage servicing rights for
impairment based on the fair value of those rights. When adopted, effective
January 1, 1996, the Company does not anticipate that this provision will have a
significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate Owned
Real estate owned includes properties acquired through foreclosure and
properties acquired for development and sale. Real estate acquired through
foreclosure is transferred to real estate owned at the lower of cost or
estimated fair value, which represents the new recorded basis of the property.
Subsequently, properties are evaluated and any additional declines in value are
provided for in an allowance for losses on real estate. Real estate acquired for
development and sale is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value.
Allowances for Losses
Allowances for losses on loans and real estate owned are established when a loss
is probable and can be reasonably estimated. These allowances are provided based
on past experience and the prevailing market conditions. Management's evaluation
of loss considers various factors including, but not limited to, general
economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, prior loss experience,
estimated sales price, and holding and selling costs. Provisions for loan losses
are recorded to maintain the Company's overall allowance for loan losses within
an acceptable range to cover probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio as
of the respective balance sheet dates.
Management believes that the allowances for losses on loans and real estate
owned are adequate. While management uses available information to recognize
losses, future additions to the allowances may be necessary based on changes in
economic conditions.
Office Properties and Equipment
Office properties and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation and leasehold amortization. Depreciation of office buildings and
improvements and furniture and equipment is computed on the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements
are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the term of
the related lease.
RF-9
<PAGE>
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the
period that includes the enactment date.
Earnings Per Share
Net income for primary earnings per share is adjusted for the dividends on
convertible preferred stock. The average number of common shares and common
equivalent shares outstanding for 1995, 1994, and 1993 was 40,620,932,
37,943,933, and 32,049,577, respectively.
Fully diluted earnings per share has been computed using the weighted average
number of common shares and common equivalent shares, including the effect of
the assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock into common stock. The
average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding for
1995, 1994, and 1993 for the purpose of calculating fully diluted earnings per
share was 45,541,197, 39,005,360, and 40,395,649, respectively.
Cash Flows
For the purpose of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash
on hand, amounts due from banks and other highly liquid debt instruments with an
initial maturity of three months or less.
(2) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
During the fourth quarter of 1995, the Company completed the acquisitions of
Kirksville Bancshares, Inc. (Kirksville) and WSB Bancorp, Inc. (WSB). A total of
1,521,435 shares of the Company's common stock was issued in connection with the
Kirksville transaction, which was accounted for as a pooling of interests. The
Company paid a total cash consideration of approximately $25.0 million in a
purchase transaction to acquire WSB. Total assets of the acquired institutions
were approximately $227.6 million. The effect of these transactions were not
material to the consolidated financial statements and operating results of the
acquired entities are included since the respective acquisition dates.
RF-10
<PAGE>
On June 30, 1994, the Company completed the acquisition of Farm & Home Financial
Corporation (Farm & Home) whose assets totaled $3.1 billion. As a result of this
transaction, the Company issued 17,993,838 shares of common stock. The
transaction was accounted for as a pooling of interests and, accordingly, the
consolidated financial statements of the Company have been restated to include
the results of Farm & Home for all periods presented. Total income,
extraordinary items, and net income for the Company and Farm & Home after the
effect of the restatement for SFAS 115 (discussed further below) and prior to
the combination were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1993
----
(in thousands)
<S> <C>
COMPANY
Total income (1)........................ $ 94,528
Extraordinary items (net of income tax
effect)................................ (1,908)
Net income.............................. 36,190
FARM & HOME
Total income (1)........................ 85,179
Net income.............................. 8,682
COMBINED
Total income (1)........................ 179,707
Extraordinary items (net of income tax
effect)................................ (1,908)
Net income.............................. 44,872
</TABLE>
(1) Net interest income and noninterest income.
Farm & Home adopted the provisions of SFAS 115 on January 1, 1994. Such adoption
by Farm & Home resulted in a pretax charge to operations of $9.8 million ($6.5
million net of tax) to reflect an other than temporary impairment of certain
interest-only stripped coupon mortgage-backed pass-through certificates and
collateralized mortgage obligation residual interests. As the Company had
adopted SFAS 115 at December 31, 1993, the $6.5 million net of tax charge by
Farm & Home, which was recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, was reflected in the consolidated statement of operations of the
Company for 1993.
On April 22, 1994, the Company completed the acquisition of Home Federal Bancorp
of Missouri, Inc. (Home Bancorp). Each holder of the common stock of Home
Bancorp received 0.4945 of a share of common stock of the Company on a pre-split
basis and $7.50 in cash for each share of Home Bancorp common stock held for a
total consideration of $68.3 million. Home Bancorp's total consolidated assets
were $532.7 million and savings deposits were $466.5 million. The transaction
was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and resulted in an
intangible asset related to the deposit accounts of approximately $13.8 million.
On November 8, 1993, the Company completed the acquisition of the 17 eastern
Missouri retail banking branches of Home Savings of America. The Company
received net cash totaling approximately $709.4 million. Gross proceeds totaled
$733.3 million, which represented the amount of deposit accounts acquired by the
Company and accrued but unpaid interest on such accounts. This amount was
reduced by approximately $23.9 million, which was paid by the Company for the
acquisition of certain loans made by Savings of America primarily secured by
deposit accounts, real property, furniture and fixtures related to the branch
locations, and a tax deductible intangible asset related to the deposit accounts
of approximately $7.7 million.
On June 11, 1993, the Company completed the acquisition of the Missouri retail
banking franchise of First Nationwide Bank of San Francisco, California (First
Nationwide). The Company received net cash totaling approximately $588.1
million. Gross proceeds totaled $595.1 million, which represented the amount of
deposit accounts acquired by the Company and accrued but unpaid interest on such
accounts. This amount was reduced by approximately $7.0 million, which was paid
by the Company for the acquisition of certain loans made by First Nationwide
primarily secured by deposit accounts, real property, furniture and fixtures
related to the branch locations, and a tax deductible intangible asset related
to the deposit accounts of approximately $75,000.
Other acquisition and sale activity of Farm & Home during 1994 and 1993 is
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nature Items Sold,
Date of Transactions Purchased or Exchanged Cash Consideration
- ---- --------------- ---------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
July 1, 1994 Sale of loan production $75.2 million of Texas home builder Received $75.2 million
business in Texas lines of credit and six land acquisition
and development/rehab loans
June 24, 1994 Sale of Corpus Christi, Texas $54.8 million of branch deposits Paid $53.9 million
branch facility and deposit and $927,000 of related deposit
accounts account loans and furniture and
fixtures
June 3, 1994 Sale of deposit accounts $13.6 million of branch deposits Paid $13.4 million
of branch and $177,000 of related deposit
account loans
December 17, 1993 Sale of two Austin, Texas $260.0 million of branch deposits Paid $251.0 million
and four San Antonio, Texas and $9.0 million of branch facilities
branch facilities and deposit accounts and deposit related deposit account
loans and furniture and fixtures
November 19, 1993 Purchase of two retail banking $107.5 million of branch deposits Received $104.3 million
branches in Springfield, Missouri and $1.0 million of related deposit
loans, furniture and fixtures, and a
$2.2 million tax deductible core
deposit intangible
April 12, 1993 Sale of Harrisonville, Texas $18.7 million of branch deposits and Paid $18.5 million
branch facility and deposits $190,000 of related deposit account loans
and furniture and fixtures
March 5, 1993 Exchange of two branch facilities $133.9 million of branch deposits and Received $63.1 million
and deposit accounts from three related deposit account loans and
branch facilities in Texas furniture and fixtures exchanged for
for two branch facilities and $198.1 million of branch deposits, $863,000
accounts and five branch facilities of related deposit account loans, and a
in Missouri $711,000 tax deductible core deposit
intangible
</TABLE>
RF-11
<PAGE>
(3) FAIR VALUE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The Company's primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to position
the Company such that changes in interest rates do not have a material adverse
impact upon the net market value of the Company. Net market value considers
the fair value of financial instruments (assets, liabilities, and off-balance-
sheet items), in contrast to the accompanying consolidated balance sheets which
are historical cost based. The estimated fair values of the Company's assets
and liabilities, and the related carrying amounts from the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1995 DECEMBER 31, 1994
------------------------ -----------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
---------- --------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents............................................$ 15,433 $ 15,433 $ 22,106 $ 22,106
Securities available for sale:
Investment securities.............................................. 159,857 159,857 109,136 109,136
Mortgage-backed securities......................................... 1,433,648 1,433,648 1,593,015 1,593,015
Interest rate exchange, cap, and floor agreements.................. 12,956 12,956 62,955 62,955
Options............................................................ -- -- 593 593
Securities held to maturity:
Investment securities.............................................. 119,186 120,517 156,773 156,170
Mortgage-backed securities......................................... 3,430,954 3,431,341 3,119,289 2,996,829
Loans................................................................ 3,577,892 3,708,014 3,072,151 2,995,981
Office properties and equipment, net................................. 52,466 53,262 53,483 52,980
Deferred losses on interest rate exchange agreements................. 20,831 -- 21,243 --
Unamortized fees on interest rate
caps, floors, and collar........................................... 38,049 37,302 43,318 18,913
Other assets......................................................... 151,789 159,548 177,804 220,530
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$ 9,013,061 $ 9,131,878 $ 8,431,866 $ 8,229,208
========= ========= ========= =========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Deposits.................. $ 4,907,497 $ 4,954,183 $ 4,899,389 $ 4,815,151
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase....................... 1,082,814 1,083,048 1,208,127 1,206,478
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank................................. 2,377,138 2,378,419 1,707,938 1,687,847
Other borrowings..................................................... 47,523 50,260 47,384 46,876
Deferred gains on interest rate exchange agreements.................. 5,661 -- 16,673 --
Interest rate exchange agreements.................................... -- 108,698 -- 18,487
Other liabilities.................................................... 95,522 95,292 110,729 102,668
Total liabilities.................................................. 8,516,155 8,669,900 7,990,240 7,877,507
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net market value..................................................... -- 461,978 -- 351,701
Stockholders' equity................................................. 496,906 -- 441,626 --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$ 9,013,061 $ 9,131,878 $ 8,431,866 $ 8,229,208
========= ========= ========= =========
NON-FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
Demand deposits.....................................................$ -- $ 19,552 $ -- $ 52,231
Commitments to extend credit........................................$ 225,324 $ 225,752 $ 57,422 $ 57,201
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
RF-12
<PAGE>
Net market value is not intended to represent the value of the Company's stock
or the amounts distributable to stockholders in connection with a sale of the
Company or in the unlikely event of its liquidation. Such amounts ascribe no
value to intangible assets or to the going concern value of the enterprise.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating
fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents - Due to the short-term nature of these financial
instruments, carrying value approximates fair value.
Investment securities and mortgage-backed securities - Fair values are based on
quoted market prices or dealer quotes. Where such quotes are not available,
fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar agreements and
securities, or in limited instances discounted cash flow analyses. Stock in the
Federal Home Loan Bank is valued at cost, which represents redemption value and
approximates fair value.
Loans - The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows at
market interest rates for loans of similar credit risk, terms and maturities,
taking into consideration repricing characteristics and prepayment risk.
Office properties and equipment - The fair value of office properties is
estimated based upon in-house appraised values for the Company's properties.
The net book value of office equipment is assumed to approximate its fair value.
Other assets and liabilities - The estimated fair value of other assets, which
includes intangibles and real estate owned and other liabilities represents the
sum of all contractual financial receivables or obligations adjusted for the tax
effects.
Deposits with defined maturities - The fair value of certificates of deposit
accounts is based on the discounted values of contractual cash flows using rates
currently offered in the marketplace for accounts of similar remaining
maturities.
Deposits without defined maturities - For the purposes of calculating "Net
Market Value," no consideration is given to the economic value of the Bank's
long-term relationships with its depositors. For deposit liabilities without
defined maturities, fair value is assumed to be the amount payable on demand at
the reporting date. By ignoring what is commonly referred to as a core deposit
intangible, no consideration is given to the present value of the Company's
expected future profitability derived from those customer relationships.
However, such value as calculated by the Company is disclosed, net of applicable
income taxes, under the heading "Non-Financial Instruments." The aforementioned
value has been calculated by comparing the rates paid on deposits to a rate paid
on a wholesale borrowing having a maturity equal to the expected maturity of the
deposits reduced by the cost to service and insure such deposits.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - Fair values are based on the
discounted value of contractual cash flows using dealer quoted rates for
agreements of similar terms and maturities.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank - The fair value of advances from the
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) is based on discounted values of contractual cash
flows using rates currently offered in the marketplace for instruments with
similar terms and maturities.
Other borrowings - Fair values are based on quoted market prices, dealer quotes,
or on the discounted values of contractual cash flows using market derived
spreads.
Interest rate exchange agreements - The fair values of interest rate exchange
agreements, which includes swaps, caps, and floors, are estimated by comparing
the contractual rates the Company is paying or receiving to market rates quoted
on new agreements with similar maturities by counterparties of similar
creditworthiness. Changes in
RF-13
<PAGE>
the fair values and carrying values of existing agreements are included in
the fair values of the assets or liabilities being hedged.
Commitments to extend credit - The fair value of commitments is estimated
using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present
creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments,
fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest
rates and the committed rates.
Income taxes - The estimated income tax effects arising from the
differences between fair values and tax bases of financial instruments is
calculated and included in the fair value disclosure of other assets or
other liabilities. The effect of the restoration to taxable income of the
Bank's bad debt reserves for income tax purposes resulting from the
unlikely event of liquidation has not been included.
(4) SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
The amortized cost and market value of securities available for sale at December
31, 1995 are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
U.S. Government and agency obligations.. $ 10,671 $ 439 $ (25) $ 11,085
Corporate securities.................... 14,882 1,887 (6) 16,763
--------- --------- --------- ----------
25,553 2,326 (31) 27,848
FHLB stock.............................. 132,009 -- -- 132,009
--------- --------- --------- ----------
157,562 2,326 (31) 159,857
--------- --------- --------- ----------
Mortgage-backed Securities:
Mortgage-backed certificates:
GNMA................................... 694,541 17,996 (538) 711,999
FNMA................................... 342,405 4,440 (313) 346,532
FHLMC.................................. 308,839 6,380 (803) 314,416
Other................................... 59,512 3,090 (1,901) 60,701
Derivative financial instruments:
Interest rate exchange agreements...... (4,294) -- (2,234) (6,528)
Interest rate cap agreements........... 23,997 -- (15,259) 8,738
Interest rate floor agreements......... 4,271 6,475 -- 10,746
--------- --------- --------- ----------
1,429,271 38,381 (21,048) 1,446,604
--------- --------- --------- ----------
$ 1,586,833 $ 40,707 $ (21,079) $ 1,606,461
========= ========= ========= ==========
</TABLE>
RF-14
<PAGE>
The amortized cost and market value of securities available for sale at December
31, 1994 are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
FHLB stock........................... $ 109,136 $ -- $ -- $ 109,136
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Mortgage-backed Securities:
Mortgage-backed certificates:
GNMA.............................. 693,362 68 (30,698) 662,732
FNMA.............................. 493,412 41 (18,002) 475,451
FHLMC............................. 408,640 8 (13,519) 395,129
Other................................ 60,584 2,105 (2,986) 59,703
Derivative financial instruments:
Interest rate exchange agreements.. -- 3,476 -- 3,476
Interest rate cap agreements....... 31,426 26,471 -- 57,897
Interest rate floor agreements..... 5,191 -- (3,609) 1,582
Exchange traded options............ 81 512 -- 593
--------- --------- --------- ---------
1,692,696 32,681 (68,814) 1,656,563
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$1,801,832 $ 32,681 $ (68,814) $1,765,699
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The amortized cost and market value of debt securities available for sale at
December 31, 1995, by contractual maturity, are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMORTIZED MARKET
COST VALUE
----------- -----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Due in one year or less................. $ 2,753 $ 2,755
Due after one year through five years... 9,866 10,028
Due after five years through ten years.. 11,889 14,002
Due after ten years..................... 1,045 1,063
--------- ---------
25,553 27,848
Mortgage-backed securities.............. 1,429,271 1,446,604
--------- ---------
$ 1,454,824 $ 1,474,452
========= =========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, accrued interest receivable on securities
available for sale totaled $8.0 million and $7.3 million, respectively.
Securities available for sale with an amortized cost and approximate market
value of $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion at December 31,1995 and 1994,
respectively were pledged to secure deposits, securities sold under agreements
to repurchase, other borrowings and interest rate exchange agreements.
Gross realized gains on the sale of or early redemption by the issuer of
securities available for sale totaled $25.0 million, $15.4 million and $25.9
million for 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Gross realized losses on such
securities totaled $1.1 million, $43.6 million, and $11.2 million for 1995, 1994
and 1993, respectively.
RF-15
<PAGE>
(5) SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
The amortized cost and market value of securities held to maturity at December
31,1995 are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
U.S. Government and agency obligations.. $ 113,554 $ 1,242 $ -- $ 114,796
Corporate securities.................... 5,632 89 -- 5,721
--------- -------- -------- ---------
119,186 1,331 -- 120,517
--------- -------- -------- ---------
Mortgage-backed Securities:
Mortgage-backed certificates:
GNMA.................................. 13,895 177 (243) 13,829
FNMA.................................. 131,874 1,919 (422) 133,371
FHLMC................................. 239,026 3,287 (742) 241,571
Private pass-throughs.................. 2,705,311 21,618 (21,758) 2,705,171
Collateralized mortgage obligations.... 340,848 2,556 (6,005) 337,399
--------- -------- -------- ---------
3,430,954 29,557 (29,170) 3,431,341
--------- -------- -------- ---------
$ 3,550,140 $ 30,888 $ (29,170) $ 3,551,858
========= ======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
The amortized cost and market value of securities held to maturity at December
31, 1994 are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
U.S. Government and agency obligations.. $ 115,500 $ 208 $ (1,814) $ 113,894
Corporate securities.................... 41,273 1,127 (124) 42,276
--------- -------- -------- ---------
156,773 1,335 (1,938) 156,170
--------- -------- -------- ---------
Mortgage-backed Securities:
Mortgage-backed certificates:
GNMA.................................. 16,595 20 (722) 15,893
FNMA.................................. 169,820 677 (4,194) 166,303
FHLMC................................. 272,775 1,191 (6,991) 266,975
Private pass-throughs.................. 2,271,272 678 (96,423) 2,175,527
Collateralized mortgage obligations.... 388,827 906 (17,602) 372,131
--------- -------- -------- ---------
3,119,289 3,472 (125,932) 2,996,829
--------- -------- -------- ---------
$ 3,276,062 $ 4,807 $ (127,870) $ 3,152,999
========= ======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
RF-16
<PAGE>
The amortized cost and market value of securities held to maturity at December
31, 1995, by contractual maturity, are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMORTIZED MARKET
COST VALUE
------------ ------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Due in one year or less................. $ 10,112 $ 10,204
Due after one year through five years... 109,074 110,313
Due after five years through ten years.. -- --
Due after ten years..................... -- --
--------- ---------
119,186 120,517
Mortgage-backed securities 3,430,954 3,431,341
--------- ---------
$ 3,550,140 $ 3,551,858
========= =========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, accrued interest receivable on securities held to
maturity totaled $23.1 million and $19.3 million, respectively.
Securities held to maturity with an amortized cost and approximate market value
of $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion at December 31,1995 and 1994, respectively,
were pledged to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase, other
borrowings and interest rate exchange agreements.
During 1995, certain private issuer mortgage-backed securities held by the
Company were determined to be other than temporarily impaired. As a result, the
Company recorded a $27.1 million pre-tax write-down ($17.8 million after tax)
to reflect the impairment of such securities. The amount of the write-down was
based on discounted cash flow analyses performed by management (based upon
assumptions regarding delinquency levels, foreclosure rates, and loss ratios on
REO disposition in the underlying portfolio). Discounted cash flow analyses
were utilized to estimate fair value due to the absence of a ready market for
the securities.
On November 15, 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a special
report, "A Guide to Implementation of Statement 115 on Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, Questions and Answers" (the Report).
The Report was issued as an aid in understanding and implementing SFAS 115. The
Report provided transition guidance for an enterprise that adopted SFAS 115
prior to the issuance of the Report. The guidance allowed a one-time
reassessment of the classification of securities as of a single measurement date
without tainting the classification of the remaining held to maturity debt
securities. Such reassessment and transfers were to be completed no later than
December 31, 1995. On December 31, 1995, the Company transferred into the
available for sale portfolio from the held to maturity category mortgage-backed
securities with a recorded and market value of $67.5 million and investment
securities with a recorded and market value of $17.6 million.
Effective December 31, 1993, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 115 on a
prospective basis. As a result, mortgage-backed and investment securities with
an amortized cost of approximately $1.6 billion were transferred into the
available for sale portfolio. At December 31, 1993, these securities were
adjusted to reflect the excess market value over amortized cost of $18.3
million. Additionally, a tax liability of $6.7 million was recorded to reflect
the tax effect of the adjustment to market. The net increase of $11.6 million
was recorded as an unrealized gain and included as a separate component of
stockholders' equity. In addition, the Company recorded a pretax charge to
operations of $9.8 million to reflect an other than temporary impairment of
certain interest-only stripped coupon mortgage-backed pass-through certificates
and collateralized mortgage obligation residual interests. The resultant $6.5
million impairment was recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of tax, in the consolidated statement of operations of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 1993.
RF-17
<PAGE>
(6) LOANS
Loans are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1995 1994
----------- -----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Real Estate:
Residential................................... $ 3,320,098 $ 2,887,992
Construction.................................. 11,969 18,489
Commercial.................................... 137,507 132,316
Consumer loans................................. 125,633 84,013
---------- ----------
3,595,207 3,122,810
Add (Deduct):
Loans in process.............................. (4,266) (28,348)
Purchased loan premiums....................... 17,359 10,848
Unearned discounts............................ (9,105) (9,369)
Deferred loan costs (fees).................... 552 (875)
Allowance for losses.......................... (21,855) (22,915)
---------- ----------
$ 3,577,892 $ 3,072,151
========== ==========
Weighted average interest rate at end of year.. 7.58% 7.43%
==== ====
</TABLE>
Gross loans at December 31, 1995, by contractual maturity or repricing date,
were as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION CONSUMER TOTAL
----------- ---------- ------------ -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Adjustable-rate loans:
Due within one year........................... $ 555 $ 14,816 $ 9,039 $ 409 $ 24,819
After one but within five years............... 38,857 19,399 1,451 9,258 68,965
After five but within ten years............... 28,272 13,840 -- 56,923 99,035
After ten years............................... 2,025,723 15,181 277 398 2,041,579
--------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
2,093,407 63,236 10,767 66,988 2,234,398
--------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
Fixed-rate loans:
Due within one year........................... 3,598 11,343 1,202 11,065 27,208
After one but within five years............... 46,081 39,747 -- 42,918 128,746
After five but within ten years............... 97,540 20,260 -- 3,853 121,653
After ten years............................... 1,079,473 2,920 -- 809 1,083,202
--------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
1,226,692 74,270 1,202 58,645 1,360,809
--------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
$3,320,099 $137,506 $ 11,969 $125,633 $3,595,207
========= ======= ======= ======= =========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, accrued interest receivable on loans totaled
approximately $22.3 million and $18.4 million, respectively.
Nonaccrual loans totaled $9.5 million and $7.6 million at December 31, 1995 and
1994, respectively. If interest on these loans had been recognized, such income
would have been $1.1 million and $686,000 for 1995 and 1994, respectively.
During 1995 and 1994, these nonaccrual loans contributed $203,000 and $221,000
to interest income,respectively. In addition, at December 31, 1995 and 1994, the
Company had troubled debt restructurings aggregating $661,000 and $2.8 million,
respectively. During 1995 and 1994, these troubled debt restructurings
contributed $175,000 and $184,000 to interest income, respectively. Had these
loans not been restructured interest income would have been $211,000 and
$222,000 for 1995 and 1994, respectively.
As of December 31, 1995, the Company had outstanding commitments to originate
fixed-rate mortgage loans of approximately $54.0 million, adjustable-rate
mortgage loans of approximately $45.5 million, fixed-rate residential
construction loans of approximately $1.9 million, and adjustable-rate
residential construction loans of approximately $300,000. The Company also had
outstanding commitments to purchase adjustable-rate mortgage loans of
approximately $123.3 million. Commitments to extend credit may involve, to
varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the
amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of credit loss
in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the commitment is
represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. Interest rate risk on
commitments to extend credit results from the possibility that interest rates
may have moved unfavorably from the position of the Company since the time the
commitment was made.
RF-18
<PAGE>
The Company services loans for its own account and also services loans for
third-party investors under loan servicing agreements. Pursuant to these
agreements, the Company typically collects from the borrower monthly payments of
principal and interest on mortgage loans and additional amounts towards payment
of real estate taxes and insurance. The Company retains its servicing fee from
such payments and remits the balance of the principal and interest payments to
the investors in the mortgage loans or associated mortgage-backed securities.
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the Company serviced 78,698 loans totaling $5.0
billion and 83,537 loans totaling $5.3 billion, respectively. Of these amounts,
$3.0 billion and $2.5 billion were serviced on the Company's own behalf at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Activity in purchased mortgage servicing rights, which is recorded in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, is summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year.................................. $ 22,556 $ 28,117 $ 49,647
Purchases................................................... 812 -- 14,660
Sales....................................................... (3,273) -- --
Amortization................................................ (4,233) (5,561) (36,190)
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year........................................ $ 15,862 $ 22,556 $ 28,117
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
(7) REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate owned is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1995 1994
-------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Acquired through foreclosure................................ $ 19,098 $ 19,282
Acquired for development and sale........................... 705 2,517
------ ------
19,803 21,799
Less allowance for losses................................... (4,370) (6,484)
------ ------
$ 15,433 $ 15,315
====== ======
</TABLE>
(8) ALLOWANCE FOR LOSSES ON LOANS AND REAL ESTATE
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year.................................. $ 22,915 $ 9,056 $ 10,753
Provision charged to expense................................ 1,200 12,432 706
Additions acquired through acquisitions..................... 1,166 2,483 --
Charge-offs, net............................................ (3,426) (1,056) (2,403)
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year........................................ $ 21,855 $ 22,915 $ 9,056
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
RF-19
<PAGE>
Activity in the allowance for losses on real estate owned is summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
---------- -------- -------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year.......................................... $ 6,484 $ 3,737 $ 4,776
Provision for real estate losses.................................... -- 4,581 4,238
Additions acquired through acquisitions............................. -- 197 --
Charge-offs......................................................... (2,114) (2,031) (5,277)
------ ------ ------
Balance, end of year................................................ $ 4,370 $ 6,484 $ 3,737
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
(9) OFFICE PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Office properties and equipment are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1995 1994
--------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Land, office buildings and improvements............... $ 53,601 $ 53,463
Furniture and equipment............................... 23,056 20,085
Leasehold improvements................................ 4,349 4,339
------- -------
81,006 77,887
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization........ 28,540 24,404
------- -------
$ 52,466 $ 53,483
======= =======
</TABLE>
Depreciation and amortization expense on office properties and equipment totaled
$4.3 million, $5.8 million, and $4.3 million for 1995, 1994, and 1993,
respectively.
The Company and its subsidiaries lease certain premises and equipment under
operating leases which expire through the year 2014, with certain lease
agreements containing renewal options. Minimum lease payments (in thousands) for
the years ending December 31 are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1996................................................................$ 2,839
1997................................................................ 2,658
1998................................................................ 2,349
1999................................................................ 1,115
2000................................................................ 669
2001 through 2014................................................... 2,647
-------
$ 12,277
=======
</TABLE>
Rent expense totaled $2.8 million, $4.7 million, and $4.3 million for 1995,
1994, and 1993, respectively.
RF-20
<PAGE>
(10) INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets and fair value in excess of cost of net assets acquired
(negative goodwill), included in other assets and other liabilities,
respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1995 1994
-------- -------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Intangible assets:
Goodwill............................................... $ 671 $ 671
Core deposit intangibles............................... 33,457 27,380
------ -------
34,128 28,051
Less accumulated amortization.......................... 4,896 2,569
------ -------
29,232 25,482
Negative goodwill, net of accumulated amortization....... (4,173) (5,281)
------ ------
$ 25,059 $ 20,201
====== ======
</TABLE>
The presentation of intangible assets in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles does not recognize the future economic benefits associated
with certain of the Company's intangible assets whose amortization is tax
deductible. Such intangible assets approximated $9.0 million at December 31,
1995. The future benefits associated with such tax deductible intangibles is
approximately $3.2 million.
Goodwill (including negative goodwill) and core deposit intangibles resulted
from business combinations which were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting and from branch deposit acquisitions. These intangibles are amortized
on a straight line basis over the period that it is expected to be benefited,
not to exceed ten years. Intangible assets are periodically reviewed for
possible impairment when events or changed circumstances affect the underlying
basis of the assets.
(11) DEPOSITS
Deposits are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994
-------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
PERCENT AVERAGE PERCENT AVERAGE
AMOUNT OF TOTAL RATE AMOUNT OF TOTAL RATE
----------- -------- ------ ----------- --------- -------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Demand deposits:
NOW................................ $ 343,036 7.0% 0.96% $ 335,261 6.8% 1.12%
Passbook........................... 327,219 6.7 2.31 396,002 8.1 2.29
Money market demand................ 555,277 11.3 4.12 558,991 11.4 3.06
--------- ----- ---------- -----
Total demand deposits 1,225,532 25.0 2.75 1,290,254 26.3 2.32
--------- ----- ---------- -----
Certificates of deposit:
2.00% to 4.00%..................... 44,903 .9 3.78 787,244 16.1 3.72
4.00% to 6.00%..................... 2,278,911 46.4 5.40 1,976,308 40.3 4.89
6.00% to 8.00%..................... 1,324,401 27.0 6.53 719,146 14.7 6.76
8.00% to 10.00%.................... 33,207 .7 9.03 121,448 2.5 8.63
10.00% & above..................... 674 -- 11.16 4,439 .1 11.05
--------- ---- --------- -----
Total certificates of deposit 3,682,096 75.0 5.82 3,608,585 73.7 5.14
--------- ----- ---------- -----
Unearned discount on brokered
certificates....................... (117) -- -- -- -- --
Net adjustment related to purchase
method of accounting............... (14) -- -- 550 -- --
--------- ----- --------- ----
$ 4,907,497 100.0% 5.05% $ 4,899,389 100.0% 4.38%
========= ===== ==== ========== ===== =====
</TABLE>
RF-21
<PAGE>
The scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994
---------------------------- --------------------------
PERCENT PERCENT
AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL
-------------- -------- ----------- --------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Due within:
One year...................................... $ 2,204,654 59.9% $ 1,998,163 55.4%
Two years..................................... 741,149 20.1 725,953 20.1
Three years................................... 250,594 6.8 406,549 11.3
Four years.................................... 279,177 7.6 174,495 4.8
Five years.................................... 119,912 3.3 230,928 6.4
Thereafter.................................... 86,610 2.3 72,497 2.0
--------- ----- --------- -----
$ 3,682,096 100.0% $ 3,608,585 100.0%
========= ===== ========= =====
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, accrued interest payable on deposits totaled $7.2
million and $6.7 million, respectively.
Certificate of deposit accounts with balances of $100,000 or greater totaled
$262.8 million and $207.4 million at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
At December 31, 1995, $48.0 million will mature within three months, $59.3
million will mature in three to six months, $66.8 million will mature in six
months to one year, and $88.7 million will mature after one year.
Interest expense on deposits by type is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1995 1994 1993
---- ------ ----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Passbook..................................................... $ 8,063 $ 9,821 $ 8,527
NOW and money market demand.................................. 22,782 23,706 21,933
Certificates of deposit...................................... 202,991 166,663 162,145
------- ------- --------
$ 233,836 $ 200,190 $ 192,605
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
(12) SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Mortgage-backed securities sold under agreements to repurchase are treated as
financings. The securities underlying the agreements are book entry securities
and are delivered, by appropriate entry, to the major investment banking firms
(dealers) used in the transactions. The dealers may have sold, loaned, or
otherwise disposed of such securities to other parties in the normal course of
their operations, and have agreed to resell to the Company the same securities
or substantially identical securities at the maturities of the agreements.
The carrying value and market value of securities sold under agreements to
repurchase are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994
------------------------------------------------------------------
CARRYING MARKET CARRYING MARKET
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
----- ----- ----- -----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Agreements involving:
Same securities...................................... $ 897,261 $ 928,600 $1,056,386 $1,147,100
Substantially identical securities................... 185,553 186,600 151,741 152,400
--------- --------- --------- ---------
1,082,814 1,115,200 1,208,127 1,299,500
Accrued interest payable............................ 5,534 -- 5,388 --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$1,088,348 $1,115,200 $1,213,515 $1,299,500
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
RF-22
<PAGE>
The scheduled maturities of securities sold under agreements to repurchase are
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1995 1994
----------- -----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Maturing within 30 days............................................... $ 951,602 $ 1,158,127
30 - 90 days.......................................................... 34,462 --
Over 90 days.......................................................... 96,750 50,000
--------- ---------
$ 1,082,814 $ 1,208,127
========= =========
</TABLE>
Financial data pertaining to the weighted average cost, the level of securities
sold under agreements to repurchase, and the related interest expense were as
follows (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted average interest rate at end of year............... 5.84% 5.96% 3.42%
Weighted daily average interest rate during the year........ 5.93 4.47 3.74
Daily average of securities sold under
agreements to repurchase................................ $1,426,101 $1,193,671 $1,277,514
Maximum securities sold under agreements to
repurchase at any month end............................. 1,685,869 1,650,963 1,493,445
Interest expense during the year............................ 84,557 53,303 47,786
</TABLE>
RF-23
<PAGE>
(13) ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Advances from the FHLB are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE
DUE IN AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT RATE
- ------ ---------- ------- ---------- --------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1995.................................... $ -- --% $ 738,000 5.95%
1996.................................... 2,077,000 5.74 420,000 5.42
1997.................................... 165,756 6.57 415,756 6.32
1998.................................... 57,500 5.73 57,500 5.55
2000.................................... 75,000 5.76 75,000 5.97
2003.................................... 2,000 6.39 2,000 6.39
--------- ---------
2,377,256 5.80 1,708,256 5.90
Net adjustment related to purchase
method of accounting (118) (318)
---------- -- ---------- --
$ 2,377,138 5.80% $ 1,707,938 5.90%
========== ==== ========== ====
</TABLE>
Financial data pertaining to the weighted average cost, the level of FHLB
advances and the related interest expense were as follows (dollars in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted average interest rate at end of year.................. 5.80% 5.90% 4.13%
Weighted daily average interest rate during the year........... 5.99 4.80 4.17
Daily average of FHLB advances................................. $2,236,899 $1,579,100 $ 706,900
Maximum FHLB advances at any month end......................... 2,460,000 1,857,000 1,050,000
Interest expense during the year............................... 134,073 75,800 29,452
</TABLE>
The Company is required to maintain mortgage-backed securities with a market
value of 100% of outstanding collateralized advances and qualifying loans with
principal balances aggregating 150% of outstanding noncollateralized advances.
FHLB stock is also pledged as collateral for these advances.
During April 1994, the Company terminated a $100.0 million advance from the FHLB
while restructuring its portfolio in order to maintain the Company's then
existing interest rate position. This resulted in a pretax loss totaling
approximately $980,000 in 1994, which has been recorded, net of its tax effect,
as an extraordinary item.
RF-24
<PAGE>
(14) OTHER BORROWINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Other borrowings are summarized as follows: DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1995 1994
------------ -----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Mortgage-backed bonds (net of unamortized discounts
of $92,000 and $96,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively), 10.125% due April 15, 2018.................. $ 19,664 $ 19,660
Subordinated notes, 9.5% due August 1, 2002.................. 27,859 27,724
------ ------
$ 47,523 $ 47,384
====== ======
</TABLE>
The payment of principal and interest on the 9.5% notes is subordinated at all
times to any indebtedness of the Company outstanding or incurred after the date
of issuance. The subordinated notes are callable at the option of the Company
after August 1, 1995 at par plus accrued interest. In the indenture relating to
the subordinated notes, the Company is restricted as to the amounts of
additional indebtedness it may incur and the amount of dividends and other
distributions it may pay to its stockholders.
During 1994 and 1993, the Company repurchased and defeased mortgage-backed bonds
totaling $54.3 million and $72.9 million, respectively. This resulted in pretax
losses totaling approximately $7.2 million and $3.0 million in 1994 and 1993,
respectively, which have been recorded, net of their tax effect, as an
extraordinary item.
During 1991, the Company, under the name Farm & Home, issued $31.0 million of
13.0% subordinated debentures in exchange for all of its then existing 13.0%
Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Preferred Stock. The debentures, which were
recorded net of discount of $4.0 million, had a net book value of $27.0 million
at December 31, 1993, were scheduled to mature in 2016, and had an effective
interest rate of 13.58%. In June 1994, using the proceeds from the issuance of
319,000 shares of preferred stock and cash reserves, these debentures were
called at par. This resulted in a pretax loss totaling $4.0 million which has
been recorded, net of its tax effect, as an extraordinary item.
(15) INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
The Company's primary objective regarding asset and liability management is to
position the Company such that changes in interest rates do not have a material
adverse effect on net interest income or the net market value of the Company.
The Company's primary strategy for accomplishing its asset and liability
management objectives is achieved by matching the weighted average maturities of
assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet items (duration matching). Integral
to the duration matching strategy is the use of derivative financial instruments
such as interest rate exchange agreements, interest rate cap and floor
agreements and, to a much lesser extent, interest rate collar agreements and
financial futures contracts.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments solely for risk management
purposes. None of the Company's derivative instruments are what are termed
leveraged instruments. These types of instruments are riskier than the
derivatives used by the Company in that they have embedded options that enhance
their performance in certain circumstances but dramatically reduce their
performance in other circumstances. The Company is not a dealer nor does it make
a market in such instruments. The Company does not trade the instruments and
the Board of Directors' approved policy governing the Company's use of these
instruments strictly forbids speculation of any kind.
RF-25
<PAGE>
The risks generally associated with interest rate exchange agreements are also
the same as for interest rate cap, floor, and collar agreements. Such risks are
the risk that the counterparty in the agreement may default ("credit risk"), the
risk that at the time of any such default, interest rates may have moved
favorably from the perspective of the nondefaulting party ("market risk") and
the risk that interest accrued and due to the Company previously reflected in
the consolidated balance sheets may not be received as a result of the default.
The Company's interest rate exchange agreements and interest rate cap and floor
agreements have been entered into with nationally recognized commercial and
investment banking firms or the FHLB. As such, the Company does not anticipate
nonperformance by the counterparties. Financial futures contracts are subject to
similar market risks as are interest rate exchange agreements; however, credit
risk is substantially mitigated due to the requirement that participants settle
changes in the value of their positions daily.
Interest rate exchange agreements are summarized as follows (dollars in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1995
---------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTIONAL AVERAGE AVERAGE WEIGHTED
PRINCIPAL RATE RATE AVERAGE FAIR
AMOUNT RECEIVED PAID MATURITY VALUE
------ -------- ---- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Available for sale:
Fixed interest paid........... $ 260,000 5.84% 6.27% 4.25 yrs $ (6,528)
------- ------
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Fixed interest paid........... 795,000 5.88 8.99 5.82 yrs (122,468)
Variable interest
rate paid................... 159,000 7.36 5.94 6.05 yrs 13,770
------- --------
954,000 6.13 8.48 (108,698)
------- ---------
Total....................... $ 1,214,000 6.06% 8.01% $ (115,226)
========= ==== ==== =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1994
--------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTIONAL AVERAGE AVERAGE WEIGHTED
PRINCIPAL RATE RATE AVERAGE FAIR
AMOUNT RECEIVED PAID MATURITY VALUE
------ -------- ---- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Available for sale:
Fixed interest rate paid $ 275,000 5.61% 4.81% 9 mos $ 3,476
------- -----
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Fixed interest rate paid...... 1,140,000 6.09 8.12 5.10 yrs (11,921)
Variable interest
rate paid................... 159,000 7.36 5.57 7.05 yrs (6,566)
--------- -------
1,299,000 6.25 7.81 (18,487)
--------- -------
Total........................ $ 1,574,000 6.13% 7.28% $ (15,011)
========= ==== ==== =======
</TABLE>
Typically, the Company pays a fixed rate of interest for a fixed period of time
and receives a variable rate of interest indexed to the three month London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Changes in the variable rates in the Company's
interest rate exchange agreements are designed to offset changes in the
Company's yield received on securities available for sale and the cost of short-
term deposits and other borrowings.
RF-26
<PAGE>
Interest rate cap, floor and collar agreements are summarized as follows
(dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NOTIONAL AVERAGE CURRENT WEIGHTED
OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL CAP INDEX AVERAGE CARRYING FAIR
DECEMBER 31, AMOUNT RATE RATE MATURITY VALUE VALUE
- ------------ --------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CAPS:
1995 Available for sale $ 2,152,500 8.15% 5.85% 3.40 yrs $ 23,997 $ 8,738
Interest-bearing
liabilities......... 400,000 9.63 5.88 8.93 yrs 12,876 6,135
------- ------ ------
Total ............... $ 2,552,500 8.38% 5.85% 4.26 yrs $ 36,873 $ 14,873
========= ==== ==== ====== ======
1994 Available for sale $ 2,152,500 8.15% 5.93% 4.40 yrs $ 31,426 $ 57,897
Interest-bearing
liabilities......... 400,000 9.63 6.19 9.93 yrs 14,320 13,278
------- ------ ------
Total................ $ 2,552,500 8.38% 5.97% 5.26 yrs $ 45,746 $ 71,175
========= ==== ==== ====== ======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NOTIONAL AVERAGE CURRENT WEIGHTED
PRINCIPAL FLOOR INDEX AVERAGE CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT RATE RATE MATURITY VALUE VALUE
--------- -------- ------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FLOORS:
1995 Available for sale $ 615,000 5.12% 4.76% 5.06 yrs $ 4,271 $ 10,746
Interest-bearing
liabilities.............. 955,000 5.32 5.01 6.27 yrs 25,035 31,116
------- ------- -------
Total..................... $ 1,570,000 5.24% 4.91% 5.80 yrs $ 29,306 $ 41,862
========== ==== ==== ======= =======
1994 Available for sale...... $ 615,000 5.12% 4.67% 6.06 yrs $ 5,191 $ 1,582
Interest-bearing
liabilities.......... 955,000 5.32 5.02 7.27 yrs 28,788 5,584
------- ------- -------
Total................. $ 1,570,000 5.24% 4.88% 6.80 yrs $ 33,979 $ 7,166
========== ==== ==== ======= =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NOTIONAL AVERAGE CURRENT WEIGHTED
PRINCIPAL FLOOR/CAP INDEX AVERAGE CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT RATE RATE MATURITY VALUE VALUE
--------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
COLLAR:
1995 Interest-bearing
liabilities.......... $ 25,000 5.25%/ 5.88% 2.84 yrs $ 138 $ 51
10.25%
1994 Interest-bearing
liabilities.......... $ 25,000 5.25%/ 6.06% 3.84 yrs $ 210 $ 51
10.25%
</TABLE>
RF-27
<PAGE>
Changes in the notional amounts of interest rate exchange, cap, floor and collar
agreements were as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST
RATE EXCHANGE RATE CAP RATE FLOOR RATE COLLAR
AGREEMENTS AGREEMENTS AGREEMENTS AGREEMENTS
-------------- ----------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Notional balance at December 31, 1993 $ 1,605,250 $ 1,846,500 $ 1,670,000 $ 25,000
Purchases -- 706,000 -- --
Terminations and maturities (31,250) -- (100,000) --
---------- ---------- ---------- -------
Notional balance at December 31, 1994 1,574,000 2,552,500 1,570,000 25,000
Maturities (360,000) -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- -------
Notional balance at December 31, 1995 $ 1,214,000 $ 2,552,500 $ 1,570,000 $ 25,000
========== ========== ========== =======
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995, unamortized fees related to the purchase of interest rate
cap, floor, and collar agreements totaled $62.0 million. The annual
amortization of the unamortized fees is summarized as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INTEREST-
AVAILABLE BEARING
FOR SALE LIABILITIES TOTAL
---------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1996................................................. $ 7,421 $ 5,269 $ 12,690
1997................................................. 5,441 5,263 10,704
1998................................................. 3,335 5,020 8,355
1999................................................. 2,178 4,502 6,680
2000................................................. 1,552 4,502 6,054
2001 through 2005.................................... 4,047 13,493 17,540
------ ------ ------
$ 23,974 $ 38,049 $ 62,023
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
The Company has terminated interest rate exchange and floor agreements which
have resulted in deferred gains and losses. At December 31, 1995, net deferred
losses totaled approximately $15.2 million. The annual amortization of the
deferred net losses is summarized as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
1996.................................................. $ 1,764
1997.................................................. 2,484
1998.................................................. 3,570
1999.................................................. 2,765
2000.................................................. 2,503
2001 through 2002..................................... 2,084
------
$ 15,170
======
</TABLE>
The Company also utilizes short positions in financial futures contracts to
reduce the interest rate risk of certain mortgage backed securities in the
available for sale portfolio. Each short position is a contract representing a
commitment to sell a $1.0 million, ninety day maturity Eurodollar deposit.
Futures contract price changes settle on a daily basis whereby the Company
either makes or receives a cash payment.
RF-28
<PAGE>
Futures contracts utilized to reduce the interest rate risk of certain mortgage
backed securities in the available for sale portfolio are summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Contracts
--------------------------------------------------
Face Recognized
Number Amount Gain (Loss)
------ ------ ----------
(dollars in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1995 4,115 $ 4,115 $(71.0)
December 31, 1994 11,072 $11,072 $ 39.5
</TABLE>
During August 1996, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Staff)
performed a regular review of the Company's 1995 Form 10-K in conjunction with
Registration Statements on Form S-4 filed by the Company related to three
pending acquisitions.
As a result of this review, the Staff questioned the Company's original
accounting treatment surrounding the deferral and recognition of gains and
losses on financial futures contracts used to reduce the interest rate risk of
certain mortgage backed securities in the Company's available for sale
portfolio. The Company originally recognized a $34.8 million charge to fourth
quarter 1995 earnings regarding the cessation of deferral accounting.
At issue was the Staff's contention that the financial futures contracts did not
meet the "high correlation" criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 80, "Accounting for Futures Contracts", thus not qualifying for
deferral accounting from the inception of the hedge in March 1994 and requiring
the recognition of subsequent gains and losses in income. The Company originally
ceased deferral accounting when management concluded that high correlation
measured using the "cumulative dollar approach" was unlikely to be achieved on a
consistent basis.
Accordingly, at the Staff's request, the Company has restated its 1994 and 1995
consolidated financial statements to reflect the cessation of deferral
accounting, from the inception of the hedge, with respect to the aforementioned
financial futures contracts. The restatement had the effect of increasing
previously reported 1994 net income and decreasing previously reported 1995 net
income by $18.0 million (on a fully-diluted per share basis, an increase of
$0.48 for 1994 and a decrease of $0.43 for 1995). This restatement is one of the
timing of recognition of gains and losses in the Statement of Operations and has
no impact on total stockholders' equity at any date since both the financial
futures contracts and the related mortgage-backed securities have been
previously marked to market through stockholders' equity at each reporting
period.
Subsequent to December 31, 1995, the Company terminated all of its financial
futures positions and maintained its interest rate risk management position by
principally redesignating existing interest rate exchange agreements to the
available for sale portfolio. Such interest rate exchange agreements were
utilized prior to the redesignation to manage the interest rate risk of
interest-bearing deposits and other short-term borrowings.
(16) NET GAIN (LOSS) FROM FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Net gain (loss) from financial instruments is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity....................... $ -- $ (231) $ (663)
Investment securities held to maturity............................ -- 209 --
Mortgage-backed securities held for trading....................... -- (4,545) 2,668
Mark to market of financial futures contracts..................... (71,022) 39,508 --
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale..................... 23,885 (28,208) 14,659
Investment securities available for sale.......................... -- (115) 60
Cancellation cost of interest rate exchange agreements............ -- (8,910) (4,496)
Options expense................................................... (11,079) (8,368) (1,582)
------- ------- ------
$ (58,216) $(10,660) $ 10,646
======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
(17) INCOME TAXES
If certain conditions are met, savings and loan associations and savings banks
are allowed special bad debt deductions in determining taxable income based on
either specified experience formulas or on a percentage of taxable income before
such deduction. Bad debt deductions in excess of actual losses are tax-
preference items, and are subject to a minimum tax. The Company used the
percentage of taxable income method for 1995, 1994, and 1993 in determining the
bad debt deduction for tax purposes.
RF-29
<PAGE>
Income tax expense (benefit) before extraordinary item and the cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal.................................................... $ (437) $ 38,520 $ 11,186
1,743
State...................................................... (21) 2,699
Deferred: 12,994
Federal.................................................... 10,309 (14,805) 1,211
State...................................................... 407 (1,030)
------- -------- -------
$ 10,258 $ 25,384 $ 27,134
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The reasons for the difference between the expected income taxes, computed at
the statutory rate of 35% and the actual income taxes are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- ------ ------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computed "expected" income tax.......................... $ 13,075 $ 26,236 $ 28,141
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit.......... 278 1,085 1,920
Resolution of federal tax issues........................ (2,188) (3,110) (1,709)
Nondeductible acquisition costs......................... 101 2,469 --
Other, net.............................................. (1,008) (1,296) (1,218)
------ ------ ------
$ 10,258 $ 25,384 $ 27,134
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
The components of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1995 1994
------ ------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Unrealized losses on securities.............. $ 12,506 $ 18,270
Litigation settlement........................ 1,604 2,365
Purchased mortgage service rights............ 3,704 2,241
Provision for losses on loans................ 7,412 9,456
Other........................................ 4,278 6,325
------ ------
Total deferred tax assets................... 29,504 38,657
------ ------
Deferred tax liabilities:
FHLB stock dividends......................... 8,203 7,210
Purchase accounting adjustments.............. 2,294 --
Bad debt reserves in excess of base year..... 4,792 3,755
Deferred income.............................. 7,275 8,876
Other........................................ 2,346 3,506
------ ------
Total deferred tax liabilities.............. 24,910 23,347
------ ------
Net deferred tax asset.................... $ 4,594 $ 15,310
====== ======
</TABLE>
Retained earnings at December 31, 1995 included earnings of approximately $93.0
million representing tax bad debt deductions, net of actual bad debts and bad
debt recoveries, for which no provision for Federal income taxes has been made.
If these amounts are used for any purpose other than to absorb loan losses, they
will be subject to Federal income taxes at the then prevailing corporate rate.
RF-30
<PAGE>
(18) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred Stock
On March 2, 1993, the Company completed the public offering of 920,000 shares of
6.5% non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock with a liquidation
preference of $50 per share. The net proceeds from the issuance totaled $44.2
million. Each share of preferred stock is convertible, at the option of the
holder, into shares of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share at a
conversion price of $40 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment in
certain events. The preferred stock is redeemable, at the option of the
Company, in whole at any time or in part, from time to time, on or after May 16,
1997 at $50 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
On August 17, 1993, the Company issued 80,000 additional shares of 6.5% non-
cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock. These newly issued shares
were exchanged for 119,025 shares of common stock of the Company. The market
value of the preferred stock issued was equal to that of the common stock being
exchanged.
On June 30, 1994, the Company completed the offering of 319,000 shares of 6.5%
non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock. The net proceeds from the
issuance totaled $21.3 million. The net proceeds from the offering, together
with other cash on hand, were used for the early retirement of 13.0%
subordinated debentures issued by the Company under the name Farm & Home.
Stock Repurchase Program
On December 15, 1994, the Board of Directors of Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.
authorized the Company to acquire up to 1,750,000 shares of its own common
stock, subject to market conditions, prior to December 31, 1997. The stock
repurchased is to be held in treasury in order to fund, from time to time, the
Company's benefit programs. Shares of stock repurchased may also be retired,
from time to time, if not needed for other corporate purposes. Through December
31, 1995, 224,500 shares of common stock of the Company have been repurchased
pursuant to the stock repurchase program at a weighted average price of $15.93.
Common Stock Split
On March 29, 1994, the Company declared a three-for-one common stock split in
the form of a 200% common stock dividend payable on May 18, 1994 to stockholders
of record on May 2, 1994. Under the terms of the stock split, stockholders
received a dividend of two shares for every one share held on the record date.
Common shares outstanding for the periods presented, average shares utilized in
computing earnings per share and all stock option information has been adjusted
to reflect the split.
RF-31
<PAGE>
(19) REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA)
requires that an institution meet three specific capital requirements: a
leverage ratio of core capital to total adjusted assets, a tangible capital
ratio expressed as a percent of total tangible assets and a risk-based capital
standard expressed as a percent of risk-adjusted assets. As of December 31,
1995, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital standards, as follows (dollars in
millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTUAL REQUIREMENT EXCESS CAPITAL
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tangible Capital......................... $ 474.7 5.26% $ 135.5 1.50% $ 339.2 3.76%
Core Capital............................. 477.1 5.28 271.0 3.00 206.1 2.28
Risk-based Capital....................... 495.7 14.60 271.6 8.00 224.1 6.60
</TABLE>
A reconciliation at December 31, 1995 of stockholders equity and regulatory
risk-based capital follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Stockholders' equity of the Bank......... $ 515,355
Unrealized gains on available for sale
securities............................. (10,986)
General valuation allowances............. 18,622
Assets required to be deducted - intangible assets and
nonincludable subsidiaries............. (29,638)
Qualifying intangible assets............. 2,369
-------
Regulatory risk-based capital of the Bank $ 495,722
=======
</TABLE>
The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has adopted a rule incorporating an
interest rate risk component into its risk-based capital requirements which
utilizes a methodology to measure the interest rate risk exposure of
institutions. This exposure is a measure of the potential decline in the net
portfolio value of the institution based upon the effect of an assumed 200 basis
point increase or decrease in interest rates. "Net portfolio value" is the
present value of the expected net cash flow from the institution's assets,
liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. Under the OTS regulation, an
institution's "normal" level of interest rate risk in the event of this assumed
change in interest rates is a decrease in the institution's net portfolio value
in an amount not exceeding two percent of the present value of its assets. The
amount of the required deduction is one-half of the difference between (a) the
institution's actual calculated exposure to the 200 basis point interest rate
increase or decrease (whichever results in the greater pro forma decrease in net
portfolio value) and (b) its "normal" level of exposure which is two percent of
the present value of its assets. The OTS recently announced that it will delay
the effectiveness of the regulation until it adopts the process by which an
institution may appeal an interest rate risk capital deduction determination.
Utilizing this measurement concept, the Bank's interest rate risk at December
31, 1995 would not be greater than normal as defined by the OTS, thus not
requiring any additional risk-based capital.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) was
signed into law on December 19, 1991. Regulations implementing the prompt
corrective action provisions of FDICIA became effective on December 19, 1992.
In addition to the prompt corrective action requirements, FDICIA includes
significant changes to the legal and regulatory environment for insured
depository institutions, including reductions in insurance coverage for certain
kinds of deposits, increased supervision by the Federal regulatory agencies,
increased reporting requirements for insured institutions, and new regulations
concerning internal controls, accounting, and operations. The prompt corrective
action regulations define specific capital categories based on an institution's
capital ratios. The capital categories, in declining order, are "well
capitalized", "adequately capitalized", "undercapitalized", "significantly
undercapitalized" and "critically undercapitalized". To be considered "well
capitalized", an institution must generally have a leverage (core) ratio of at
least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6%, and a total risk-
based capital ratio of at least 10%. At December 31, 1995, the Bank's capital
levels would result in a determination of "well capitalized" under the prompt
corrective action regulations of FDICIA.
The Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend on, or repurchase, any of its
common stock if the effect thereof would cause the capital of the Bank to be
reduced below either the amount required for its liquidation account established
at the time of its conversion from mutual to stock form of ownership or the
capital requirements imposed by the OTS. As of December 31, 1995, the Bank was
in compliance with these requirements.
RF-32
<PAGE>
(20) STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
The 1986 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (Plan) was adopted to enable the
Company to attract and retain key personnel. The Plan provides for the granting
of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards,
and stock appreciation rights. The Plan authorizes the issuance of up to
4,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock. In addition, the 1994 Non-
Employee Director Stock Option Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 150,000
shares of the Company's common stock.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the Plan in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" and, accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense as the exercise
price of the Company's employee stock options equal the market price of the
underlying stock on the date of grant. In October 1995, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS 123). Upon adoption in
1996, the Company will elect the pro forma disclosure alternative provided in
SFAS 123. Thus, such adoption will not have any impact on the Company's
financial condition or results of operations.
Information on the Company's stock options are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE PRICE PER SHARE OPTION
SHARES PER SHARE PRICE RANGE
-------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1992 2,483,380 $ 5.61
Granted 138,000 13.73
Exercised (249,366) 3.33
Cancelled (7,539) 3.66
------
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1993 2,364,475 15.77 $3.00-13.75
Granted 205,500 13.89
Exercised (1,420,347) 4.63
Cancelled -- --
-------
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1994 1,149,628 7.67 $3.00-15.50
Assumed in merger 93,506 4.09
Granted 150,000 16.54
Forfeited (9,000) 16.08
Exercised (349,680) 4.53
--------
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1995 1,034,454 $ 9.62 $3.00-18.00
========= =======
</TABLE>
(21) EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PROGRAMS
Substantially all employees are included in a trusted defined benefit pension
plan. Benefits contemplated by the plan are funded through payments of the
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund, which operates a multi-employer plan and
does not report relative plan assets and actuarial liabilities of the individual
participating companies. The cost of funding is charged to current operations.
There is no unfunded liability for past service. In addition, the Company
maintains a retirement plan for outside directors. Pension expense totaled
$1,367,000, $359,000, and $205,000 for 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively.
The Company maintains a thrift savings plan, qualify under Section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code, administered by the Financial Institutions Thrift Plan,
and covering substantially all employees. Participants may designate up to 15%
of their annual compensation as their contribution to the plan. Contributions
by employees of up to 6% of their annual compensation are partially or fully
matched by the Company based on each employee's number of years of service.
Matching contribution by the Company totaled $936,000, $866,000, and $779,000
for 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively.
The Company also sponsors an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) which covers
substantially all employees with more than one year of employment who have
attained the age of twenty-one. The ESOP provides for a grant of the Company's
stock equal to 1% of the annual compensation of each eligible employee up to
annual compensation of $75,000. Contributions are made on December 31 of each
year of all eligible employees on that date. Dividends on shares held in each
employees's account are reinvested. Contributions made to the ESOP by the
Company totaled $247,000, $448,000, and $842,000 for 1995, 1994 and 1993,
respectively.
RF-33
<PAGE>
In addition, the Company sponsors an unfunded retiree medical, dental, and death
benefits plan covering eligible employees who retired prior to July 1, 1990 and
retired directors from Farm & Home. The plan is contributory with retiree
contributions adjusted from time to time. The Company accounts for the plan in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, "Employers
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions" (SFAS 106). The
plan's impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements are not
material, therefore the disclosures required by SFAS 106 are not presented.
(22) LITIGATION
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to a number of lawsuits and claims,
some of which involve substantial amounts arising out of the conduct of its
business. Management, after review and consultation with outside legal counsel,
is of the opinion that the ultimate disposition of such litigation and claims
will not have a material adverse effect of the Company's consolidated financial
statements.
(23) PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------
1995 1994
---------- ----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
Cash...................................................................... $ 2,616 $ 2,090
Investment in subsidiaries................................................ 517,080 465,192
Investment securities available for sale.................................. 2,531 --
Other assets.............................................................. 4,946 4,172
-------- --------
$ 527,173 $ 471,454
======== ========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Subordinated notes....................................................... $ 27,859 $ 27,724
Other liabilities........................................................ 2,408 2,104
Stockholders' equity..................................................... 496,906 441,626
-------- --------
$ 527,173 $ 471,454
======== ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest income............................................................. $ 82 $ 241 $ 431
Interest expense............................................................ 2,867 5,276 7,079
------- ------- -------
Net interest expense....................................................... (2,785) (5,035) (6,648)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries.......................................... 29,368 54,568 50,021
General and administrative expenses......................................... (683) (7,469) (1,543)
------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes and extraordinary item.......................... 25,900 42,064 41,830
Income tax (benefit)........................................................ (1,198) (2,280) (3,042)
------- ------- -------
Income before extraordinary item........................................... 27,098 44,344 44,872
Extraordinary item, net of income tax effect................................ -- (2,617) --
------- ------- -------
Net income................................................................. $ 27,098 $ 41,727 $ 44,872
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
RF-34
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income.............................................. $ 27,098 $ 41,727 $ 44,872
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries...................... (29,368) (54,568) (50,021)
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt...... -- 3,965 --
Other, net.............................................. 1,317 270 (9,456)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used in operating activities................ (953) (8,606) (14,605)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Dividends received...................................... 52,050 45,650 7,500
Additional investment in subsidiary.................... (21,463) (19,036) (44,613)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.. 30,587 26,614 (37,113)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Redemption of subordinated notes........................ -- (31,022) --
Cash dividends paid..................................... (26,789) (18,056) (11,501)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock............... -- 21,273 44,185
Costs from exchange of stock............................ -- -- (28)
Purchase of treasury stock.............................. (3,426) (150) --
Exercise of stock options............................... 1,107 6,459 748
-------- -------- --------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities.. (29,108) (21,496) 33,404
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash...................... 526 (3,488) (18,314)
Cash at beginning of year............................... 2,090 5,578 23,892
-------- -------- --------
Cash at end of year..................................... $ 2,616 $ 2,090 $ 5,578
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
RF-35
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995
---------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents............................. $ 64,253 $ 15,433
Securities available for sale:
Investment securities............................... 159,783 159,857
Mortgage-backed securities.......................... 1,193,977 1,446,604
Securities held to maturity:
Investment securities............................... 113,570 119,186
Mortgage-backed securities.......................... 3,420,771 3,430,954
Loans................................................. 4,016,699 3,577,892
Real estate owned..................................... 14,920 15,433
Office properties and equipment, net.................. 51,732 52,466
Other assets.......................................... 292,067 195,236
---------- -----------
$9,327,772 $ 9,013,061
========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Deposits.............................................. $4,995,371 $ 4,907,497
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase........ 994,852 1,082,814
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank.................. 2,610,738 2,377,138
Other borrowings...................................... 47,593 47,523
Other liabilities..................................... 162,901 101,183
---------- -----------
Total Liabilities................................. 8,811,455 8,516,155
---------- -----------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock -- $.01 par value; $50 preference
value; 6.5% noncumulative perpetual convertible;
aggregate preference value of $65,050; 3,000,000
shares authorized and 1,301,000 issued and
outstanding........................................ 13 13
Common stock -- $.01 par value; 90,000,000 shares
authorized; 42,145,561 and 41,991,701 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 1996 and December 31,
1995, respectively................................. 421 420
Paid-in capital..................................... 264,216 262,381
Retained earnings -- subject to certain
restrictions....................................... 249,730 223,606
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale,
net of taxes....................................... 3,389 12,019
Unamortized restricted stock awards................. (1,452) (1,533)
---------- -----------
Total Stockholders' Equity........................ 516,317 496,906
---------- -----------
$9,327,772 $ 9,013,061
========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
RF-36
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
------------------- -----------------
1996 1995 1996 1995
--------- --------- -------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Loans................................ $ 73,297 $ 61,822 $145,307 $120,762
Securities available for sale........ 25,597 34,931 54,945 72,155
Securities held to maturity.......... 63,048 65,569 127,525 125,583
Other................................ 338 254 646 512
--------- --------- -------- --------
Total interest income.............. 162,280 162,576 328,423 319,012
--------- --------- -------- --------
Interest expense:
Deposits............................. 60,955 58,240 122,119 112,631
Other borrowings..................... 52,514 56,304 105,860 109,596
Interest rate exchange agreements,
net................................. 5,515 2,349 10,774 2,789
--------- --------- -------- --------
Total interest expense............. 118,984 116,893 238,753 225,016
--------- --------- -------- --------
Net interest income................ 43,296 45,683 89,670 93,996
Provision for losses on loans.......... 300 300 600 600
--------- --------- -------- --------
Net interest income after provision
for losses on loans............... 42,996 45,383 89,070 93,396
--------- --------- -------- --------
Noninterest income (loss):
Retail banking fees.................. 3,455 2,696 6,587 5,228
Insurance and brokerage sales commis-
sions............................... 2,020 2,105 3,718 4,116
Loan servicing fees, net............. 2,714 2,102 4,733 4,144
Net gain (loss) from financial in-
struments........................... 521 (22,935) 862 (55,739)
Unrealized losses on impairment of
mortgage-backed
securities held to maturity......... -- -- -- (27,063)
Other................................ 1,566 540 2,894 1,538
--------- --------- -------- --------
Total noninterest income (loss).... 10,276 (15,492) 18,794 (67,776)
--------- --------- -------- --------
Noninterest expense:
Compensation and employee benefits... 10,637 8,578 20,519 17,211
Occupancy............................ 4,469 4,376 8,391 8,657
Federal insurance premiums........... 2,267 3,212 4,606 6,423
Other................................ 6,055 5,574 11,630 10,942
--------- --------- -------- --------
Total noninterest expense.......... 23,428 21,740 45,146 43,233
--------- --------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income tax ex-
pense............................. 29,844 8,151 62,718 (17,613)
Income tax expense..................... 10,116 2,291 21,425 (7,298)
--------- --------- -------- --------
Net income (loss).................. $ 19,728 $ 5,860 $ 41,293 $(10,315)
========= ========= ======== ========
Net income (loss) attributable to
common stock...................... $ 18,671 $ 4,803 $ 39,179 $(12,444)
========= ========= ======== ========
Earnings per share:
(loss) Primary....................... $ 0.44 $ 0.12 $ 0.92 $ (0.31)
========= ========= ======== ========
Fully-diluted........................ $ 0.42 $ 0.12 $ 0.88 $ (0.31)
========= ========= ======== ========
Dividends Paid......................... $ 0.155 $ 0.14 $ 0.31 $ 0.28
========= ========= ======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
RF-37
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK
------------------ -------------------- PAID-IN RETAINED
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS
--------- ------- ---------- -------- --------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31,
1994................... 1,319,000 $ 13 40,173,527 $ 402 $ 255,655 $209,379
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- -- 27,098
Purchase of common stock
for treasury........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock
through stock options
and employee stock
plans.................. -- -- 243,763 3 1,531 (1,572)
Issuance of common stock
in the acquisition of
Kirksville Bancshares,
Inc.................... -- -- 1,521,435 15 5,426 15,475
Exchange of preferred
stock for common
stock.................. (18,000) -- 52,976 -- (231) --
Amortization of re-
stricted stock awards.. -- -- -- -- -- --
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock........... -- -- -- -- -- (22,531)
Preferred stock........ -- -- -- -- -- (4,243)
Unrealized gains on se-
curities available for
sale, net.............. -- -- -- -- -- --
--------- ------- ---------- -------- --------- --------
Balance, December 31,
1995................... 1,301,000 13 41,991,701 420 262,381 223,606
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- -- 41,293
Issuance of common stock
through stock options
and employee stock
plans.................. -- -- 153,860 1 1,835 --
Amortization of re-
stricted stock awards.. -- -- -- -- -- --
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock........... -- -- -- -- -- (13,055)
Preferred stock........ -- -- -- -- -- (2,114)
Unrealized losses on se-
curities available for
sale, net.............. -- -- -- -- -- --
--------- ------- ---------- -------- --------- --------
Balance, June 30, 1996.. 1,301,000 13 42,145,561 421 264,216 $249,730
========= ======= ========== ======== ========= ========
Balance, December 31,
1994................... (10,000) (150) (23,673) -- 441,626
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- 27,098
Purchase of common stock
for treasury........... (214,500) (3,426) -- -- (3,426)
Issuance of common stock
through stock options
and employee stock
plans.................. 209,976 3,345 -- (1,621) 1,686
Issuance of common stock
in the acquisition of
Kirksville Bancshares,
Inc.................... -- -- -- -- 20,916
Exchange of preferred
stock for common
stock.................. 14,524 231 -- -- --
Amortization of re-
stricted stock awards.. -- -- -- 88 88
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock........... -- -- -- -- (22,531)
Preferred stock........ -- -- -- -- (4,243)
Unrealized gains on se-
curities available for
sale, net.............. -- -- 35,692 -- 35,692
--------- ------- ---------- -------- ---------
Balance, December 31,
1995................... -- -- 12,019 (1,533) 496,906
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- 41,293
Issuance of common stock
through stock options
and employee stock
plans.................. -- -- -- -- 1,836
Amortization of re-
stricted stock awards.. -- -- -- 81 81
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock........... -- -- -- -- (13,055)
Preferred stock........ -- -- -- -- (2,114)
Unrealized losses on se-
curities available for
sale, net.............. -- -- (8,630) -- (8,630)
--------- ------- ---------- -------- ---------
Balance, June 30, 1996.. -- $ -- 3,389 $ (1,452) $ 516,317
========= ======= ========== ======== =========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
RF-38
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
----------------------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income............................................. $ 41,293 $ (10,315)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash pro-
vided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization......................... 2,201 2,069
Amortization of discounts and premiums, net........... 15,921 1,815
Increase in accrued interest receivable............... (3,281) (5,299)
Decrease in accrued interest payable.................. (7,422) (201)
Provision for losses on loans......................... 600 600
Unrealized losses on impairment of mortgage-backed se-
curities held to maturity............................ -- 27,063
Other, net............................................ (3,632) (29,459)
---------- ----------
Net cash provided by operating activities............. 45,680 (13,727)
---------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments and maturities of securities avail-
able for sale........................................ 106,606 49,163
Principal payments and maturities of securities held
to maturity.......................................... 581,993 315,337
Principal payments on loans........................... 485,980 227,485
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale.. 561,202 738,622
Purchase of securities available for sale............. (432,202) (688,704)
Purchase of securities held to maturity............... (573,971) (746,243)
Purchase of loans..................................... (273,006) (171,623)
Originations of loans................................. (661,037) (198,877)
Net proceeds from sales of real estate................ 5,231 4,917
Purchase of mortgage servicing rights................. (36,069) --
Purchase of office properties and equipment........... (1,521) (999)
---------- ----------
Net cash used in investing activities................. (236,794) (470,922)
---------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from FHLB advances........................... 9,622,500 8,718,000
Principal payments on FHLB advances................... (9,389,000) (8,263,000)
Proceeds received from termination of interest rate
exchange agreements.................................. 14,185 --
Fees paid for interest rate cap agreements............ (49,290) --
Excess of deposit receipts over withdrawals (withdraw-
als over receipts)................................... 87,634 (113,726)
(Decrease) increase in securities sold under agree-
ments to repurchase, net............................. (87,962) 147,243
Proceeds from exercise of stock options............... 1,070 427
Purchase of treasury stock............................ -- (2,653)
Cash dividends paid................................... (15,169) (13,389)
Net increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and
insurance............................................ 55,966 40,755
Net cash provided by financing activities............. 239,934 513,657
---------- ----------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents.............. 48,820 29,008
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period....... 15,433 22,106
---------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period............. $ 64,253 $ 51,114
========== ==========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Payments during the period for:
Interest.............................................. $ 246,175 $ 225,217
Income taxes.......................................... 17,678 23,850
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Desecuritization resulting in transfer of mortgage-
backed securities held to maturity to loans receiv-
able held to maturity and real estate owned.......... -- 33,603
Redesignation of interest rate exchange and cap agree-
ments to securities available for sale............... 3,235 --
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
RF-39
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1--BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Roosevelt
Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Roosevelt
Bank (the Bank) and F & H Realty (Realty) and the Bank's wholly-owned
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and December 31, 1995 and for the three month
and six month periods ended June 30, 1996 and 1995.
In the opinion of management, the preceding unaudited consolidated financial
statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals
and the other than temporary impairment write-down of certain private issuer
mortgage-backed securities discussed further in Note 7 and under the heading
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations") necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition of
the Company as of June 30, 1996 and December 31, 1995 and the results of its
operations for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 1996 and
1995.
The preceding unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include
all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. The following material under the heading
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" is written with the presumption that the users of the interim
financial statements have read, or have access to, the Company's latest
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations as of December 31, 1995 and for the three year period then ended.
Therefore, only material changes in financial condition and results of
operations are discussed in the remainder of Part I.
When necessary, reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to
conform to the current period presentation.
During August 1996, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(Staff) performed a regular review of the Company's 1995 Form 10-K in
conjunction with Registration Statements on Form S-4 filed by the Company
related to three pending acquisitions.
As a result of this review, the Staff questioned the Company's original
accounting treatment surrounding the deferral and recognition of gains and
losses on financial futures contracts used to reduce the interest rate risk of
certain mortgage backed securities in the Company's available for sale
portfolio. The Company originally recognized a $34.8 million charge to fourth
quarter 1995 earnings regarding the cessation of deferral accounting.
At issue was the Staff's contention that the financial futures contracts did
not meet the "high correlation" criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 80, "Accounting for Futures Contracts", thus not qualifying for
deferral accounting from the inception of the hedge in March 1994 and
requiring the recognition of subsequent gains and losses in income. The
Company originally ceased deferral accounting when management concluded that
high correlation measured using the "cumulative dollar approach" was unlikely
to be achieved on a consistent basis.
Accordingly, at the Staff's request, the Company has restated its 1995
consolidated financial statements to reflect the cessation of deferral
accounting, from the inception of the hedge, with respect to the
aforementioned financial futures contracts. The restatement had the effect of
decreasing previously reported net income for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 1995 by $15.2 million and $37.1 million, respectively. This
restatement is one of the timing of recognition of gains and losses in the
Statement of Operations and had no impact on total stockholders' equity since
both the financial futures contracts and the related mortgage-backed
securities had been previously marked to market through stockholders' equity.
RF-40
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Subsequent to December 31, 1995, the Company terminated all of its financial
futures positions and maintained its interest rate risk management position by
principally redesignating existing interest rate exchange agreements to the
available for sale portfolio. Such interest rate exchange agreements were
utilized prior to the redesignation to manage the interest rate risk of
interest-bearing deposits and other short-term borrowings.
NOTE 2--ACQUISITIONS
On April 16, 1996, the Company announced the execution of a definitive
agreement to acquire Community Charter Corporation (CCC), a commercial bank
holding company, in a stock-for-stock transaction. CCC is the parent company
of Missouri State Bank and Trust Company (MSB), which serves the St. Louis
metropolitan area. The Company does not plan to merge MSB into its existing
wholly-owned subsidiary, Roosevelt Bank. Instead, the Company will own MSB as
a separate legal entity, which will continue to be regulated by the Missouri
Division of Finance. In the transaction each holder of the common stock of CCC
will receive 1.6 shares of the Company common stock for each share of CCC. The
transaction is subject to the approval of the stockholders of CCC and federal
banking regulators. It is currently anticipated that the transaction will be
accounted for under the pooling of interests method of accounting. CCC's
consolidated total assets were $62 million at March 31, 1996.
On April 9, 1996, the Company announced the execution of a definitive
agreement with Mutual Bancompany, Inc. (Mutual), the holding company for
Mutual Savings Bank. The transaction will result in the merger of Mutual
Savings Bank with Roosevelt Bank. At March 31, 1996, Mutual had total assets
of approximately $53 million. In the transaction, each holder of the common
stock of Mutual will receive $23 in value of common stock of the Company based
on the market price of such stock prior to closing. The transaction is subject
to the approval of the stockholders of Mutual and federal banking regulators.
The transaction is structured to qualify as a tax-free reorganization;
however, it has not been determined whether the transaction will be accounted
for under the pooling of interests method or the purchase method of
accounting.
On March 22, 1996, the Company announced the execution of a definitive
agreement with Sentinel Financial Corporation (Sentinel), the holding company
for Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association. The transaction will result
in the merger of Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association into Roosevelt
Bank. At March 31, 1996, Sentinel had total assets of approximately $149
million. In the transaction each holder of the common stock of Sentinel will
receive 1.4231 shares of common stock of the Company (subject to adjustment)
for each share of Sentinel. The transaction is subject to the approval of the
stockholders of Sentinel and federal banking regulators. The transaction is
structured to qualify as a tax-free reorganization; however, it has not been
determined whether the transaction will be accounted for under the pooling of
interests method or purchase method of accounting.
In order to apply pooling of interests accounting to any of the above
described transactions, the Company would be required to rescind its existing
stock repurchase plan described in Note 6 prior to consummation of the
respective transactions.
RF-41
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 3--SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
The amortized cost and market value of securities available for sale at June
30, 1996 are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
U.S. Government and agency
obligations.................... $ 1,204 $ 273 $ -- $ 1,477
Corporate securities............ 12,979 1,201 (12) 14,168
---------- ------- -------- ----------
14,183 1,474 (12) 15,645
FHLB stock...................... 144,138 -- -- 144,138
---------- ------- -------- ----------
158,321 1,474 (12) 159,783
---------- ------- -------- ----------
Mortgage-backed Securities:
Mortgage-backed certificates:
GNMA.......................... 667,178 6,300 (2,167) 671,311
FNMA.......................... 212,438 540 (4,117) 208,861
FHLMC......................... 234,671 738 (4,440) 230,969
Other........................... 53,051 2,084 (1,526) 53,609
Derivative financial
instruments:
Interest rate exchange
agreements................... (13,393) 16,201 (149) 2,659
Interest rate cap agreements.. 31,643 1,595 (9,325) 23,913
Interest rate floor
agreements................... 3,811 180 (1,336) 2,655
---------- ------- -------- ----------
1,189,399 27,638 (23,060) 1,193,977
---------- ------- -------- ----------
$1,347,720 $29,112 $(23,072) $1,353,760
========== ======= ======== ==========
</TABLE>
Gross realized gains and gross realized losses on sales of securities
available for sale are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------
1996 1995
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Gross realized gains....................................... $11,005 $12,573
Gross realized losses...................................... (3,573) (1,028)
------- -------
$ 7,432 $11,545
======= =======
</TABLE>
RF-42
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 4--SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
The amortized cost and market value of securities held to maturity at June
30, 1996 are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Securities:
U.S. Government and agency
obligations..................... $ 109,902 $ 962 $ -- $ 110,864
Corporate securities............. 3,668 28 -- 3,696
---------- ------- -------- ----------
113,570 990 -- 114,560
---------- ------- -------- ----------
Mortgage-backed Securities:
Mortgage-backed certificates:
GNMA........................... 11,819 123 (190) 11,752
FNMA........................... 73,879 1,280 (261) 74,898
FHLMC.......................... 84,481 2,306 (363) 86,424
Private pass-throughs............ 2,771,936 18,190 (27,898) 2,762,228
Collateralized mortgage
obligations..................... 478,656 3,630 (7,099) 475,187
---------- ------- -------- ----------
3,420,771 25,529 (35,811) 3,410,489
---------- ------- -------- ----------
$3,534,341 $26,519 $(35,811) $3,525,049
========== ======= ======== ==========
</TABLE>
NOTE 5--COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
On July 17, 1996, the Board of Directors declared the Company's thirty
fourth common stock cash dividend in the amount of 15.5 cents per share
payable August 30, 1996 to stockholders of record on August 15, 1996. On June
27, 1996, the Board of Directors declared the regular quarterly cash dividend
on the Company's Series A and Series F 6.5% non-cumulative perpetual
convertible preferred stock in the amount of 81.25 cents per share payable
August 15, 1996 to stockholders of record on August 5, 1996.
NOTE 6--STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On December 15, 1994, the Board of Directors of Roosevelt Financial Group,
Inc. authorized the Company to acquire up to 1,750,000 shares of its own
common stock or common equivalents, subject to market conditions, prior to
December 31, 1997. The stock repurchased is to be held in treasury in order to
fund, from time to time, the Company's benefit programs. Shares of stock
repurchased may also be retired, from time to time, if not needed for other
corporate purposes. Through June 30, 1996, 224,500 shares of common stock of
the Company have been repurchased at market prices pursuant to the stock
repurchase program.
NOTE 7--IMPAIRMENT OF MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
At March 31, 1995, certain private issuer mortgage-backed securities held by
the Company were determined to be other than temporarily impaired, as defined
in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115 "Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities". As a result, the Company
recorded a $27.1 million pre-tax write-down ($17.8 million after tax or $0.40
per share) for the three months ended March 31, 1995, to reflect the
impairment of such securities. The amount of the write-down was based on
discounted cash flow analyses performed by management (based upon assumptions
regarding delinquency levels, foreclosure rates and loss ratios on REO
disposition in the underlying portfolio). Discounted cash flow analyses were
utilized
RF-43
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
to estimate fair value due to the absence of a ready market for the
securities. Each of the securities deemed to be impaired were rated CCC by
Standard & Poors and Ba1, Ba2 or Ba3 by Moodys at March 31, 1995. Refer to the
caption entitled "Unrealized Losses on Impairment of Mortgage-Backed
Securities Held to Maturity" under the heading "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for further
information regarding the affected mortgage-backed securities and related
write-down.
NOTE 8--EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net income for primary earnings per share is adjusted for the dividends on
convertible preferred stock. Primary earnings per share have been computed
based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common
stock equivalents arising from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock
options unless their effect would be anti-dilutive. Common stock equivalents
are computed under the treasury stock method. Average common and common stock
equivalents outstanding, for the three month periods ended June 30, 1996 and
1995 were 42,447,558 and 40,571,773, respectively. Average common and common
stock equivalents outstanding, for the six month periods ended June 30, 1996
and 1995 were 42,410,480 and 40,572,321, respectively.
Fully-diluted earnings per share have been computed using the weighted
average number of common shares and common stock equivalents, which include
the effect of the assumed conversion of the 6.5% non-cumulative convertible
preferred stock into common stock. Net income has not been adjusted for the
preferred stock dividend for the purposes of the fully-diluted earnings per
share calculation. Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding,
for the purpose of calculating fully-diluted earnings per share, for the three
month periods ended June 30, 1996 and 1995 were 47,347,319 and 45,444,773,
respectively. Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding, for the
purpose of calculating fully-diluted earnings per share, for the six month
periods ended June 30, 1996 and 1995 were 47,302,878 and 45,478,751.
NOTE 9--ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
During June 1996, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" (SFAS
125). SFAS 125 provides accounting and reporting standards for transfers and
servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities based on
consistent application of a financial components approach that focuses on
control. It distinguishes transfers of financial assets that are sales from
transfers that are secured borrowings. Under the financial components
approach, after a transfer of financial assets, an entity recognizes all
financial and servicing assets it controls and liabilities it has incurred and
derecognizes financial assets it no longer controls and liabilities that have
been extinguished. The financial components approach focuses on the assets and
liabilities that exist after the transfer. Many of these assets and
liabilities are components of financial assets that existed prior to the
transfer. If a transfer does not meet the criteria for a sale, the transfer is
accounted for as a secured borrowing with pledge of collateral.
SFAS 125 extends the "available-for-sale" or "trading" approach in Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 (SFAS 115) to nonsecurity financial
assets that can contractually be prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way
that the holder of the asset would not recover substantially all of its
recorded investment. Thus, nonsecurity financial assets (no matter how
acquired) such as loans, other receivables, interest-only strips or residual
interests in securitization trusts that are subject to prepayment risk that
could prevent recovery of substantially all of the recorded amount are to be
reported at fair value with the change in fair value accounted for depending
on the asset's classification as "available-for-sale" or "trading". SFAS 125
also amends SFAS 115 to prevent a security from being classified as held-to-
maturity if the security can be prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way
that the holder of the security would not recover substantially all of its
recorded investment.
RF-44
<PAGE>
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
SFAS 125 is effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities occurring after December 31, 1996, and is to be
applied prospectively. Earlier or retroactive application is not permitted.
Also, the extension of the SFAS 115 approach to certain nonsecurity financial
assets and the amendment to SFAS 115 is effective for financial assets held on
or acquired after January 1, 1997. Reclassifications that are necessary
because of the amendment do not call into question an entity's intent to hold
other debt securities to maturity in the future. Due to the timing of the
issuance of this pronouncement, management is currently reviewing SFAS 125 to
determine the effect, if any, it will have on the financial statements of
Roosevelt.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" and, accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense as the
exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equal the market price
of the underlying stock on the date of grant. In October 1995, the FASB issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-
Based Compensation" (SFAS 123). Upon adoption in 1996, the Company elected the
pro forma disclosure alternative provided in SFAS 123. Such adoption did not
have any impact on the Company's financial statements.
During May 1995, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 122, "Accounting for Mortgage Servicing Rights" (SFAS 122). SFAS 122
requires that an institution which sells or securitizes loans it has
originated or purchased and maintains the servicing rights to capitalize the
cost of the rights to service such loans. As the Company has not retained
servicing on any loans that have been originated and subsequently sold, the
aforementioned provision of SFAS 122 does not have any impact on the Company's
financial statements. SFAS 122 also requires that an enterprise assess its
capitalized mortgage servicing rights for impairment based on the fair value
of those rights. SFAS 122 should be applied prospectively for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1995. The Company's adoption of SFAS 122,
effective January 1, 1996, did not have a significant impact on the Company's
financial statements.
During March 1995, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" (SFAS 121). SFAS 121 provides guidance
for the recognition and measurement of impairment of long-lived assets,
certain identifiable intangibles, and goodwill related both to assets to be
held and used and assets to be disposed of. SFAS 121 requires entities to
perform separate calculations for assets to be held and used to determine
whether recognition of an impairment loss is required and, if so, to measure
the impairment. SFAS 121 requires long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles to be disposed of to be reported at the lower of carrying amount
or fair value less costs to sell, except for assets covered by the provisions
of APB Opinion No. 30 "Reporting the Results of Operations--Reporting the
Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and
Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions". SFAS 121 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
1995, although earlier application is encouraged. The Company's adoption of
SFAS 121, effective January 1, 1996, did not have a significant impact on the
Company's financial statements.
RF-45
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page Number
-----------
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT FOR THE
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995, AND 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Independent Auditors' Report.............................................. F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets for the Years Ended June 30, 1995 and 1996.... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended June 30, 1994, 1995
and 1996................................................................. F-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended June
30, 1994, 1995 and 1996.................................................. F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 1993,
1995 and 1996............................................................ F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30,
1994, 1995 and 1996...................................................... F-10
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
Board of Directors
Sentinel Financial Corporation
Kansas City, Missouri
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sentinel
Financial Corporation and subsidiary (the Company ) as of June 30, 1995 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1996.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company s management.
Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 1995 and
1996, and the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended June 30, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Sentinel
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City (the Association ), a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is operating under a supervisory
agreement with the Office of Thrift Supervision ( OTS ) dated December 20, 1989
restricting the Association, without prior written consent of OTS, from entering
into certain types of transactions as described in Note 2. Any failure on the
part of the Association to comply with the provisions of the agreement may
subject the Association to further regulatory actions.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for certain investments in debt and equity
securities for the year ended June 30, 1995 and changed its method of accounting
for income taxes for the year ended June 30, 1994.
As discussed in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
entered into an Agreement and Plan of a Merger and Reorganization with a holding
company of another Federal savings bank that would result in a merger of the
Company subject to certain approvals.
/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
August 15, 1996
Kansas City, Missouri
F-2
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, 1995 AND 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ASSETS 1995 1996
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions $ 2,775,381 $ 913,558
Interest bearing deposits in other banks 922,738 1,655,753
Federal funds sold 50,000 50,000
----------- -----------
Total cash and cash equivalents 3,748,119 2,619,311
INVESTMENTS SECURITIES (Market value of $2,468,435
and $1,987,500) 2,498,094 1,999,639
CAPITAL STOCK OF FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK, At cost 1,848,300 1,885,500
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
(Cost of $1,100,000 in both years) 1,082,814 1,093,125
MORTGAGE-RELATED SECURITIES (Market value of
$68,663,736 and $51,172,581) 68,940,693 51,519,619
ASSETS HELD FOR SALE, (Cost of $773,026 and $484,350) 773,026 484,350
LOANS RECEIVABLE, (Less allowance for loan losses
of $318,114 and $319,160) 80,956,440 82,692,873
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, net 790,241 363,461
ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE:
Loans receivable 444,221 527,115
Mortgage-related securities 535,371 414,493
Investment securities 54,704 49,465
----------- -----------
Total accrued interest receivable 1,034,296 991,073
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 77,000 73,494
OTHER ASSETS 165,147 119,716
----------- -----------
TOTAL ASSETS $161,914,170 $143,842,161
============ ============
</TABLE>
(Continued)
F-3
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, 1995 AND 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY 1995 1996
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
DEPOSITS $126,439,826 $123,253,063
ADVANCE PAYMENTS BY BORROWERS FOR TAXES AND
INSURANCE 1,352,340 1,141,976
INCOME TAXES PAYABLE 751,426 112,332
ACCRUED AND OTHER LIABILITIES 905,345 666,445
ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 21,850,000 7,000,000
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 151,298,937 132,173,816
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
Serial preferred stock, $.01 par value; 500,000
shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
Common stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares
authorized, 513,423 shares issued 5,134 5,134
Additional paid-in capital 4,602,678 4,627,459
Unearned compensation - Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (206,114) (163,929)
Unearned compensation - Management Recognition Plan (76,500) (25,500)
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net (9,433) (2,628)
Retained earnings, substantially restricted 6,299,468 7,227,809
------------ ------------
Total stockholders equity 10,615,233 11,668,345
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY $161,914,170 $143,842,161
============ ============
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements. (Concluded)
F-4
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
----------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans receivable $5,789,923 $5,854,921 $6,659,344
Mortgage-related securities 3,227,457 4,189,699 3,918,647
Investment securities 253,941 311,710 134,216
Other interest - cash and cash equivalents 146,900 66,164 291,903
---------- ---------- ----------
Total interest income 9,418,221 10,422,494 11,004,110
---------- ---------- ----------
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits 6,138,725 6,298,360 6,792,882
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 641,329 1,045,895 734,118
Termination of interest rate swap agreements 168,361
---------- ---------- ----------
Total interest expense 6,948,415 7,344,255 7,527,000
---------- ---------- ----------
NET INTEREST INCOME 2,469,806 3,078,239 3,477,110
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 41,778
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER ---------- ---------- ----------
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 2,428,028 3,078,239 3,477,110
OTHER INCOME:
Loan servicing and other fees, net 146,711 123,874 125,553
Insurance commissions 163,494 101,120 39,457
Gain on sale of securities available
for sale 53,509
Gain on sale of assets held for sale, net 35,094 30,281 128,564
Other 103,757 101,481 193,344
---------- ---------- ----------
Total other income 449,056 410,265 486,918
---------- ---------- ----------
OTHER
EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits 1,184,376 1,297,531 1,397,087
Federal insurance premiums 472,302 412,059 366,656
Professional and other outside services 299,249 309,541 437,329
Occupancy of premises 279,762 265,916 252,886
Office supplies and related expenses 123,867 132,236 135,967
Recovery of losses on real estate owned (42,677)
Impairment loss on building 242,000
Loss from settlement of litigation 145,000
Merger related expenses 135,000
Other 142,670 184,946 238,931
---------- ---------- ----------
Total other expenses 2,459,549 2,602,229 3,350,856
---------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
(Continued)
F-5
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
1994 1995 1996
-------- -------- ---------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
(BENEFIT), AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
OF CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES $417,535 $886,275 $ 613,172
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) 45,000 283,448 (315,169)
-------- -------- ---------
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF
CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES 372,535 602,827 928,341
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES 191,000 27,000 0
-------- -------- ---------
NET INCOME $563,535 $629,827 $ 928,341
======== ======== =========
EARNINGS PER SHARE
(FROM JANUARY 7, 1994):
Income before cumulative effects of changes
in accounting principles $ 0.52 $ 1.25 $ 1.81
======== ======== =========
Net income $ 0.52 $ 1.31 $ 1.81
======== ======== =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements. (Concluded)
F-6
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unearned Net
Compensation- Unearned Unrealized
Employee Compensation- Loss on Retained
Additional Stock Management Securities Earnings, Total
Common Stock Paid-In Ownership Recognition Available Substantially Stockholders
Shares Amount Capital Plan Plan for Sale Restricted Equity
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, JULY 1, 1993 $5,106,106 $5,106,106
Issuance of
common stock 472,623 $4,726 $4,189,261 4,193,987
Common stock
issued to
Employee Stock
Ownership Plan 25,500 255 254,745 ($255,000)
Common stock
issued to
Management
Recognition
Plan 15,300 153 152,847 ($153,000)
Common stock
committed to
be released
for allocation
- Employee
Stock Ownership
Plan 14,375
Amortization of
unearned
compensation -
Management
Recognition
Plan 25,500
Net income 563,535 563,535
BALANCE, JUNE 30,
------- ----- --------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ---------
1994 513,423 5,134 4,596,853 (240,625) (127,500) 5,669,641 9,903,503
Common stock
committed to be
released for
allocation -
Employee Stock
Ownership Plan 34,511 34,511
Amortization of
unearned
compensation -
Management
Recognition
Plan 51,000 51,000
Cumulative effect
of change in
accounting
principle
for securities
available for
sale, net ($27,000) (27,000)
Decrease in
unrealized loss
on securities
available for
sale, net 17,567 17,567
Increase in fair
market value of
Employee Stock
Ownership
Plan shares
committed to be
released for
allocation 5,825 5,825
Net income 629,827 629,827
BALANCE, JUNE 30,
------- ----- --------- ------- ------ ----- --------- ----------
1995 513,423 5,134 4,602,678 (206,114) (76,500) (9,433) 6,299,468 10,615,233
Common stock
committed to
be released
for allocation -
Employee Stock
Ownership Plan 42,185 42,185
Amortization of
unearned
compensation -
Management
Recognition
Plan 51,000 51,000
Decrease in
unrealized
loss on
securities
available
for sale,
net 6,805 6,805
Increase in
fair market
value of
Employee
Stock
Ownership
Plan shares
committed
to be
released
for
allocation 24,781 24,781
Net income 928,341 928,341
BALANCE, JUNE 30,
------- ------ ---------- -------- ------- ------ ---------- -----------
1996 513,423 $5,134 $4,627,459 ($163,929) ($25,500) ($2,628) $7,227,809 $11,668,345
======= ====== ========== ======== ======= ====== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 563,535 $ 629,827 $ 928,341
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Impairment loss on building 242,000
Cumulative effects of changes in
accounting principles (191,000) (27,000)
Amortization of premiums and
discounts on mortgage-
related securities and
investment securities, net 462,845 300,107 341,954
Common stock committed to be
released for allocation - ESOP 14,375 34,511 42,185
Increase in fair market value of
ESOP shares committed to be
released for allocation 5,825 24,781
Amortization of unearned
compensation related to
Management Recognition Plan 25,500 51,000 51,000
Depreciation and amortization 135,310 114,903 103,301
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
dividends (37,200)
Provision for loan losses 41,778
Recovery of losses on real estate owned (42,677)
Net loan origination fees capitalized 166,861 48,396 132,200
Amortization of net deferred loan
origination fees (58,188) (29,334) (194,888)
Gain on sale of assets held for
sale, net (35,094) (30,281) (128,564)
Gain on sale of securities available
for sale, net (53,509)
Gain on sale of real estate owned (33,572)
Unrealized losses on assets held for
sale 32,141
Provision (benefit) for deferred
income taxes (78,000) 40,000 3,506
Origination of loans held for sale (6,518,000) (4,066,850) (10,768,992)
Proceeds from sale of loans held
for sale 6,553,094 3,293,824 11,482,668
Changes in:
Accrued interest receivable (76,457) (109,893) 43,223
Other assets 5,052 (78,483) 45,431
Income taxes payable (61,908) 12,234 (639,094)
Accrued and other liabilities 117,648 208,436 (238,900)
Other, net (7,014) (3,506)
---------- ---------- -----------
Net cash provided by
operating activities 1,023,243 336,699 1,429,446
---------- ---------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from maturities of investment
securities 396,000 500,000
Proceeds from sale of securities
available for sale 56,940
Purchases of investment securities (2,492,266)
Principal collected on mortgage-
related securities 18,159,956 13,849,776 17,077,575
Purchases of mortgage-related
securities (30,994,557) (9,999,383)
Principal collected on loans
receivable, net of loan
originations 7,614,890 (8,777,320) (1,545,181)
Purchases of land, premises and
equipment (39,629) (74,723) (343,521)
Proceeds from sales of real
estate owned 180,265 109,882
Net cash provided by ----------- ---------- ----------
(used in) investing
activities (7,175,341) (4,834,828) 15,688,873
------------ ----------- -----------
(Continued)
</TABLE>
F-8
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
1994 1995 1996
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payments for deposits, net ($7,081,191) ($5,063,864) ($3,186,763)
Net (decrease) increase in advance
payments by borrowers for taxes
and insurance (109,900) 85,163 (210,364)
Proceeds from advances from Federal
Home Loan Bank 19,900,000 66,935,500 24,050,000
Repayments on advances from Federal
Home Loan Bank (19,450,000) (55,535,500) (38,900,000)
Issuance of common stock 4,193,987
---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash (used in) provided
by financing activities (2,547,104) 6,421,299 (18,247,127)
---------- ---------- ----------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS (8,699,202) 1,923,170 (1,128,808)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of year 10,524,151 1,824,949 3,748,119
---------- ---------- ----------
End of year $ 1,824,949 $3,748,119 $2,619,311
=========== ========== ==========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH
FLOW INFORMATION:
Income tax payments $55,920 $231,214 $256,887
=========== ========== ==========
Interest payments $ 6,785,874 $7,201,278 $6,814,775
=========== ========== ==========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock issued to Employee
Stock Ownership Plan $255,000
========
Issuance of common stock for
noncash consideration to
Management Recognition Plan Trust $153,000
========
Loans transferred to real estate owned $109,882
========
Transfer of land and building to assets
held for sale $425,000
========
Change in unrealized loss on
securities available for sale, net $17,567 $6,805
======= ======
See notes to consolidated financial statements. (Concluded)
F-9
<PAGE>
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Organization - Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association is a community
oriented savings bank engaged primarily in the business of attracting
customer deposits and originating mortgage loans. In September 1993,
Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City ("the
Association") formed Sentinel Financial Corporation ("the Company") to
acquire 100% of the common stock of the Association upon its conversion
from the mutual-to-stock form of ownership. The Association's conversion
and an initial public offering of the Company's common stock were completed
on January 7, 1994 with the sale of 513,423 shares of the Company's common
stock (inclusive of 25,500 and 15,300 shares acquired by the Company's
employee stock ownership plan - ESOP and the Company's management
recognition plan - MRP, respectively). The Company received net proceeds of
$4,601,987 (inclusive of $408,000 associated with the shares issued to the
ESOP and MRP), of which $4,093,987 was simultaneously transferred to the
Association in exchange for all of the Association's common stock. As a
result, the Company is a holding company which owns 100% of the Association
s common stock.
On January 7, 1994, the Association segregated and restricted $5,000,179 of
retained earnings, which was the amount of its regulatory capital at March
31, 1993, in a liquidation account for the benefit of eligible savings
account holders who continue to maintain their accounts at the Association
after the conversion. In the event of a complete liquidation of the
Association (and only in such an event), each eligible account holder will
be entitled to receive a distribution from the liquidation account in an
amount proportionate to the current adjusted balances of all qualifying
deposits then held. The liquidation account will be reduced annually to the
extent that eligible account holders have reduced their qualifying
deposits.
Subsequent to the conversion, the Company or the Association may not
declare or pay cash dividends on any of its shares of common stock if the
effect would be to reduce stockholders equity below either the amount
required for the liquidation account discussed above or the applicable
regulatory capital requirements or if such declaration and payment would
otherwise violate regulatory requirements. In addition, the supervisory
agreement described in Note 2 further restricts the payment of dividends by
the Association.
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sentinel
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City. The Association has
two wholly owned subsidiaries, Claywood Financial Services, Inc. and
Sentinel Insurance Agency, Inc. Significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
F-10
<PAGE>
Estimates - The preparation of the financial statements in conformity
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Specifically, management has made
assumptions in estimating the fair value of financial instruments,
estimates regarding loan losses, an impairment loss on building and in the
amortization/accretion of premiums/discounts on investments subject to
prepayment risk. Actual results could differ from estimates made based on
management assumptions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand,
amounts due from depository institutions, federal funds sold and interest
bearing deposits in other banks purchased with an original maturity of
three months or less.
The Association is required by regulation to maintain liquid assets in the
form of cash and securities approved by Federal regulations, at a monthly
average of not less than 5% of customer deposits and short-term borrowings.
Securities Available for Sale - On July 1, 1994, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. This Statement addresses
the accounting and reporting treatment for certain investments in debt and
equity securities by requiring such investments to be classified in
held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading categories. Securities
classified as available-for-sale are carried at market with unrealized
gains (losses) included as a separate component of equity, net of income
taxes. The adoption of the Statement resulted in a decrease to stockholders
equity of $27,000 (net of deferred income taxes) which is reflected as a
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the consolidated
statement of income for the year ended June 30, 1995.
Assets Held for Sale - Management has designated certain loans receivable
as held for sale as management does not intend to hold such assets to
maturity. Accordingly, loans receivable are carried at the lower of
amortized cost (outstanding principal, adjusted for unamortized premiums,
and unaccreted discounts) or market value. Interest on these assets
(including amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts) is
included in interest income on loans receivable.
Land and building have been designated as assets held for sale based on
management's pending sale of its Kansas City office (Note 8).
Securities Held to Maturity:
Investment Securities - Securities of the United States Government and
agencies are recorded at amortized cost based on management s intention,
and the Company s ability to hold them to maturity. Related premiums and
discounts are accreted and amortized into income over the lives of the
securities using the level-yield method.
Mortgage-Related Securities - Mortgage-related securities are recorded at
amortized cost based on management s intention, and the Company s ability
to hold them to maturity. The related premiums and discounts are accreted
and amortized over the estimated lives of the underlying securities using
the level-yield method.
F-11
<PAGE>
New Statements of Financial Accounting Standards - In June 1996, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board ( FASB ) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard ( SFAS ) No. 125, Accounting for Transfer of Financial
Assets, which will become effective for the Company beginning January 1,
1997. This Statement supersedes SFAS No. 122, Accounting for Mortgage
Servicing Rights, which requires an assessment of capitalized mortgage
servicing rights for impairment based on the fair value of those rights.
This Statement requires that after transfer of financial assets, an entity
recognizes the financial and servicing assets for which it has retained
control and any liabilities it has retained or incurred, derecognizes
financial assets for which control has been surrendered and derecognizes
liabilities when extinguished. Management believes that the implementation
of this Statement will have a minimal effect on the Company.
In March 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 121, Accounting for Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of, which will
become effective for the Company beginning July 1, 1996. It requires a
review of long-lived assets, certain intangibles and goodwill to be held
and used by an entity for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In
performing the review for recoverability, the entity should estimate the
future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its
eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived
assets and identifiable intangibles that an entity expects to hold and use
should be based on the fair value of the asset. Management believes that
the implementation of this Statement will not have a significant effect on
the Company.
In October 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation, which will become effective for the Company beginning July 1,
1996. This Statement requires the disclosure of the estimated fair value of
stock based compensation arrangements with employees and encourages but
does not require, the recognition of such expense. The Company does not
intend to adopt the recognition provisions of this Statement. Therefore,
the adoption of this Statement will have no effect on the Company s
financial condition or results from operations.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements - The Association utilized interest rate swap
agreements as part of its asset and liability management strategy. The
swaps were matched with a group of short-term deposits. The Association
utilized settlement accounting relative to the interest differential on the
swaps. Net settlements, on a quarterly or semi-annual basis, were accrued
over the term of the swap agreement and the net interest differential was
recorded as an adjustment to interest expense on deposits. During 1994, the
Association terminated the interest rate swap agreements due to the
liquidation of the matched liabilities. The losses incurred as a result of
the termination of these swaps were charged to interest expense.
Loans Receivable - Loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal less
an allowance for loan losses, undisbursed loan funds and unearned loan
fees, net of certain direct loan origination costs. Interest on loans is
credited to income as earned and accrued only if deemed collectible. Loans
are placed on nonaccrual status when, in the opinion of management, the
full timely collection of principal or interest is in doubt. As a general
rule, the accrual of interest is discontinued when principal or interest
payments become 90 days past due or earlier if conditions warrant. When a
loan is placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued but unpaid interest
is reversed against current income. Subsequent collections of cash may be
applied as reductions to the principal balance or recorded as income,
depending on management s assessment of the ultimate collectibility of the
loan. Nonaccrual loans may be restored to accrual status when principal and
interest become current and full payment of principal and interest is
expected. Nonaccrual loans are insignificant to the Company. The Company
has no impaired loans.
F-12
<PAGE>
Net loan origination and commitment fees are amortized as a yield
adjustment to interest income using the level-yield method over the
contractual lives of the related loans.
The Association is principally engaged in single family home lending in the
state of Missouri. The Association also makes consumer loans depending on
the demand and management's assessment as to the quality of such loans.
Provision for Losses on Real Estate Owned - Real estate owned represents
foreclosed assets held for sale and is recorded at fair value as of the
date of foreclosure or transfer and is subsequently carried at the lower of
the new basis (fair value at foreclosure or transfer) or fair value, less
costs of disposal. Subsequently, properties are evaluated and any
additional declines which reduce the fair value to less than carrying value
are provided for as an allowance for losses on real estate owned. Costs and
expenses related to major additions and improvements are capitalized while
maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the lives of the
assets are expensed currently.
Provision for Loan Losses - Provision for loan losses include charges to
reduce the recorded balances of loans receivable to their estimated net
realizable value. Such provisions are based on management s estimates of
the net realizable value of the collateral, which take into consideration
current and anticipated future operating or sales conditions. These
estimates are susceptible to changes that could result in a material
adjustment to operations. Recovery of the carrying value of such loans is
dependent to a great extent upon economic, operating and other conditions
that may be beyond the Company s control.
Effective July 1, 1995, the Company adopted SFAS No. 114 and subsequent
amendment SFAS No. 118, both entitled Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan, which prescribes criteria for recognition of loan
impairment as well as methods to measure impairment of certain loans,
including loans whose terms were modified in troubled debt restructurings.
The adoption of these Statements did not have a material effect on the
Company s financial statements.
Premises and Equipment - Premises and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization
are computed primarily on the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets. The following represents a summary of
estimated useful lives:
Years
Building and improvements 7- 14
Furniture and fixtures 5- 7
Leasehold improvements 10
Computer equipment and software 3- 5
Capital Stock of Federal Home Loan Bank - Capital stock of Federal Home
Loan Bank is carried at cost. Dividends received on such stock is reflected
as interest income on investment securities in the consolidated statements
of income.
Income Taxes - The Company, the Association and its subsidiaries file a
consolidated Federal income tax return. State income tax returns are
individually filed for each of the entities. On July 1, 1993, the Company
changed its method of accounting for income taxes to conform to the
requirements of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which specifies
the asset and liability
F-13
<PAGE>
method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for the
temporary differences between the financial accounting basis and tax basis
of the Company s assets and liabilities at the current statutory tax rates.
A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when their
realization is in doubt based on a more likely than not analysis. The
cumulative effect of the change in accounting for income taxes was to
increase net income by $191,000 for the year ended June 30, 1994. The
Company reflected this cumulative effect in operations during the year
ended June 30, 1994.
The Association is permitted under the Internal Revenue Code to deduct an
annual addition to a reserve for bad debts in determining taxable income,
subject to certain limitations. This addition differs from the bad debt
experience used for financial accounting purposes. Bad debt deductions for
income tax purposes are included in taxable income of later years only if
the bad debt reserve is used subsequently for purposes other than to absorb
bad debt losses. Under SFAS No. 109, a deferred tax liability is provided
only to the extent the tax bad debt reserve exceeds the base year reserve.
The base year reserve is the tax bad debt reserve as of June 30, 1988.
Retained earnings as of June 30, 1996 includes approximately $1,887,000
representing such bad debt reserve as of the base year for which no
deferred income taxes have been provided.
The Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (the "Act") was enacted into
legislation. The Act repeals the special bad debt reserve method for thrift
institutions. The Act requires thrifts to recapture only reserves
accumulated after 1987, but forgives taxes owed on reserves accumulated
prior to 1988. Thrift institutions will be given six years to account for
the recaptured excess reserves, beginning with the last taxable year
beginning after 1995, and will be permitted to delay the timing of this
recapture for one or two years subject to whether they meet certain
residential loan tests. The Act will not have a material impact on the
Association's consolidated financial statements as a deferred tax liability
has been provided on the excess reserves.
Earnings Per Share - The Company completed its initial stock offering on
January 7, 1994, and, accordingly, earnings per share for 1994 was computed
on net income and common stock outstanding from that date. Earnings per
share for 1994 was calculated by dividing net income since January 7, 1994,
aggregating $254,388 by the weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding. The weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding include the vested shares held in the
management recognition plan and shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive
options outstanding. The Company accounts for the 25,500 shares acquired by
its ESOP in accordance with Statement of Position 93-6; shares controlled
by the ESOP are not considered in the weighted average shares outstanding
until the shares are committed for allocation to an employee s individual
account. The weighted number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding for the period January 7, 1994 through June 30, 1994 and the
years ended June 30, 1995 and 1996 were 487,923, 480,886 and 512,318,
respectively.
Reclassifications - Certain items in the 1994 and 1995 financial
statements have been reclassified to conform with the 1996 presentation.
F-14
<PAGE>
2. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act
of 1989 ( FIRREA ), the Office of Thrift Supervision ( OTS )
established capital regulations requiring savings associations to
maintain: (i) core capital equal to 3% of adjusted total assets, (ii)
tangible capital equal to 1.5% of adjusted total assets and (iii) risk
based capital equal to 8.0% of risk-weighted assets. Any savings
association that is not in compliance with the capital standards shall
have 60 days from the date the savings association falls out of
compliance to submit a capital plan acceptable to OTS demonstrating
that the savings association can meet applicable capital standards.
Any savings association that files and adheres to a capital plan that
is acceptable to OTS and receives approval of a capital exception or
exemption shall not be subject to sanctions or penalties for failure
to meet its statutory capital standards, provided that the association
complies with its plan. The Company's wholly owned subsidiary,
Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City was
operating under an OTS approved capital plan through May 31, 1994. As
a result of the completion of a stock conversion and capital infusion
during fiscal 1994, OTS terminated the capital plan requirement as of
June 1, 1994, however the Association continues to operate under a
supervisory agreement.
The Association meets all of the minimum capital requirements as of
June 30, 1996. The Association's capital amounts (in thousands) and
ratios as of June 30, 1996 are as follows:
Required Actual Excess
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
Tangible capital to
adjusted
total assets $2,161 1.5% $11,144 7.7% $8,983 6.2%
Core capital to
adjusted
total assets 4,323 3.0 11,144 7.7 6,821 4.7
Total capital to risk-
weighted assets 4,469 8.0 11,463 20.5 6,994 12.5
Reconciliation of stockholders equity of the Association under
generally accepted accounting principles to risk based regulatory
capital as of June 30, 1996 is as follows:
(in thousands)
Stockholders equity $11,168
Unallowed management recognition plan (27)
Unrealized loss on certain available for sale securities 3
-------
Tangible/core capital 11,144
General loan loss reserves 319
-------
Risk-based capital $11,463
=======
As a result of an OTS review of operations and financial condition, the
Board of Directors of the Association executed a supervisory agreement with
OTS dated December 20, 1989 restricting the Association, without prior
written consent of OTS, from entering into certain types of transactions
including, among others, the origination or refinancing of certain types of
consumer loans in excess of $25,000, commercial and mortgage loans in
excess of $500,000, and restricted the nature of
F-15
<PAGE>
investments in certain assets, the disposition of certain assets, the
borrowing of money other than from a Federal Home Loan Bank, increases in
certain liabilities and the involvement in leases and other contracts with
affiliated parties. Sanctions would be imposed if the Association is unable
to continue to comply with the provisions of the agreement as approved.
Such actions may involve the appointment of a conservator to manage and
direct the future operations of the Association. Exceptions to the above
restrictions have been allowed under prior written approval of OTS.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA )
required each federal banking agency to implement prompt corrective actions
for institutions that it regulates. In response to this requirement, OTS
adopted rules based upon FDICIA s five capital tiers. The rules provide
that a savings association is well capitalized if its total risk-based
capital ratio is 10% or greater, its Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio is 6%
or greater, its leverage is 5% or greater and the institution is not
subject to a capital directive. Under this regulation, the Association
would be deemed to be well capitalized as of June 30, 1996.
3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
1995
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
U.S. Treasury
Notes
maturing
within
one year $ 499,029 $1,214 $497,815
U.S. Treasury
Notes
maturing
after
one year
through
two years 1,999,065 28,445 1,970,620
---------- ------ ----------
$2,498,094 $29,659 $2,468,435
========== ======= ==========
1996
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
U.S. Treasury
Notes
maturing
within
one year $1,999,63 $12,139 $1,987,500
========== ======= ==========
F-16
<PAGE>
4. MORTGAGE-RELATED SECURITIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Pass-through
certificates:
Federal
National
Mortgage
Association -
adjustable
rate $44,159,151 $204,395 $294,624 $44,068,922
Federal
Home
Loan
Mortgage
Corporation -
adjustable
rate 24,714,380 86,365 271,530 24,529,215
Small
Business
Adminis-
tration 67,162 1,563 65,599
----------- -------- -------- -----------
$68,940,693 $290,760 $567,717 $68,663,736
=========== ======== ======== ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Pass-through
certificates:
Federal
National
Mortgage
Association -
adjustable
rate $32,837,920 $152,862 $304,540 $32,686,242
Federal
Home
Loan
Mortgage
Corporation-
adjustable
rate 18,628,503 43,608 236,971 18,435,140
Small
Business
Adminis-
tration 53,196 1,997 51,199
----------- -------- -------- -----------
$51,519,619 $196,470 $543,508 $51,172,581
----------- -------- -------- -----------
</TABLE>
Certain mortgage-related assets have been pledged as collateral for
deposits and advances from Federal Home Loan Bank (see Notes 10 and 12).
The adjustable rate securities have interest rate adjustment limitations
and are generally indexed to the 1-year U.S. Treasury rate or a cost of
funds index.
Market prices are determined from independent sources and reflect
estimated selling prices.
5. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S.
Government
agency
securities,
maturing on
October 1,
1996 $ 1,100,000 $ 17,186 $ 1,082,814
=========== ======== ===========
</TABLE>
F-17
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S.
Government
agency
securities,
maturing on
October 1,
1996 $1,100,000 $ 6,875 $1,093,125
========== ======= ==========
</TABLE>
Market prices are determined from independent sources and reflect
estimated selling prices.
During fiscal 1995, the Association recorded a realized gain of
$53,509 on the sale of a security available for sale.
6. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Loans $ 773,026 $ 773,026
========= =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Loans $ 59,350 $ 59,350
Land and
building
(Note 3) 425,000 425,000
---------- ---------
$ 484,350 $ 484,350
========== =========
</TABLE>
Market prices are determined from independent sources and reflect
estimated selling prices.
A summary of gross realized gains (losses) on sales of assets held for
sale for the years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Gross realized gains -
loans receivable $ 36,847 $30,281 $ 128,564
Gross realized losses -
loans receivable (1,753)
---------- --------- ----------
$ 35,094 $30,281 $ 128,564
========== ========= ==========
</TABLE>
F-18
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
7. LOANS RECEIVABLE
1995 1996
<S> <C> <C>
Real estate mortgage loans:
Residential - one to four
units $74,444,100 $74,768,598
Residential -
five or more units 2,736,506 2,650,631
Construction 1,234,970 1,627,450
Commercial properties 2,195,008 2,575,687
----------- -----------
80,610,584 81,622,366
Other installment
loans:
Property improvements,
automobile and other 909,547 2,088,581
Deposits 354,619 335,456
__________ __________
1,264,166 2,424,037
Less:
Undisbursed loan funds 452,511 942,970
Unearned loan fees 147,685 91,400
Allowance for loan losses 318,114 319,160
----------- -----------
$80,956,440 $82,692,873
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
There were no commercial loans purchased during the three years in the
period ended June 30, 1996. There were no commercial loans originated
during 1994. During 1995 and 1996, commercial loan originations aggregated
approximately $1,675,000 and $500,000, respectively.
As of June 30, 1995 and 1996, loans totaling approximately $14,000 and
$168,100, respectively, were on nonaccrual status. The balance of the
reserve for uncollectible interest on nonaccrual status loans was
approximately $300 and $6,300 as of June 30, 1995 and 1996, respectively.
As of June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996, the Association was servicing loans for
others aggregating $12,877,460, $11,918,417 and $11,416,101, respectively.
Such loans are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting
mortgage payments, maintaining escrow accounts, disbursing payments to
investors and foreclosure processing. Loan servicing income includes
servicing fees from investors and certain charges collected from borrowers,
such as late payment fees. The Association held borrowers escrow balances
of $324,829, $302,777 and $259,447 as of June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996,
respectively, related to loans serviced for others.
F-19
<PAGE>
The Association originates and purchases both adjustable and fixed interest
rate loans. As of June 30, 1996, the composition of these loans was as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fixed Rate Adjustable Rate
Term to Term to Rate
Maturity Book Value Adjustment Book Value
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1 mo. - 1 yr. $548,425 1 mo. - 1 yr. $25,595,525
1 yr. - 3 yrs. 2,351,004 1 yr. - 3 yrs. 13,214,828
3 yrs. - 5 yrs. 1,116,017 3 yrs. - 5 yrs. 5,527,475
5 yrs. - 10 yrs. 6,084,527 5 yrs. - 7 yrs. 388,092
10 yrs. - 20 yrs.13,508,797
Over 20 years 14,768,743
----------- -----------
$38,377,513 $44,725,920
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The adjustable rate loans have interest rate adjustment limitations and are
generally indexed to the national monthly median cost of funds to Savings
Association Insurance Fund (SAIF)-insured institutions or the weekly average
yield on United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity
of 1 year.
The Association is subject to numerous lending-related regulations. Under
FIRREA, the Association may not make real estate loans to one borrower in
excess of the greater of 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus or
$500,000, whichever is greater. This limitation is further restricted by the
Association's supervisory agreement as described in Note 2. As of June 30,
1996, management of the Association believes it is in compliance with this
limitation.
Under FIRREA, a federally-chartered savings and loan association's aggregate
commercial real estate loans may not exceed 400% of its capital as
determined under the capital standard provisions of FIRREA. The Association
is federally-chartered and subject to this limitation. This limitation is
further restricted by the Association s supervisory believes it is in
compliance with this limitation.
A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year $277,712 $318,114 $318,114
Provision charged to expense 41,778
Recoveries (losses)
credited (charged) to the
allowance (1,376) 1,046
-------- -------- --------
Balance, end of year $318,114 $318,114 $319,160
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
F-20
<PAGE>
Aggregate loans to officers, directors and employees are summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year $ 590,866 $ 596,470 $ 733,370
New loans 317,100 279,131 8,000
Principal payments (311,496) (142,231) (37,940)
--------- --------- ----------
Balance, end of year $ 596,470 $ 733,370 $ 703,430
========= ========= ==========
</TABLE>
Management believes such loans were made under terms and conditions
substantially the same as loans made to parties not affiliated with the
Company.
The Company did not engage in any troubled debt restructuring during the
years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996.
8. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996
<S> <C> <C>
Land $429,525 $ 274,275
Building and improvements 1,057,971 48,265
Furniture and fixtures 221,310 223,389
Leasehold improvements 241,079 239,793
Computer equipment and software 227,698 238,916
-------- ----------
2,177,583 1,024,638
Less accumulated depreciation 1,387,342 (661,177)
-------- ----------
$790,241 $ 363,361
======== ==========
</TABLE>
During the year ended June 30, 1996, OTS approved the Company's application
to relocate the Company s North Kansas City office and merge the Company's
home office into its new location. As a result of OTS approval and the
pending sale of the Company's Kansas City office, management recorded a
$242,000 impairment loss, in accordance with SFAS No. 5, to reflect the
difference between the current market value of the Kansas City office and
its amortized cost. The adjusted basis of land and building has been
reclassified to assets held for sale.
9. REAL ESTATE OWNED
A summary of the activity in the allowance for losses on real estate owned
is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994
<S> <C>
Balance, beginning of year $119,433
Recovery of losses (42,677)
Losses charged against
the allowance (76,756)
--------
Balance, end of year $
========
</TABLE>
F-21
<PAGE>
10. DEPOSITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996
Amount % Amount %
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Passbook and checking accounts:
Passbook 2.72% and 2.75% as of
June 30, 1995 and 1996 $ 10,394,792 8 8,817,061 7
NOW 2.50% and 2.52% as of
June 30, 1995 and 1996 3,236,496 3 2,984,822 3
Money market demand deposits
with an average rate of
4.95% and 4.59% as of June 30,
1995 and 1996, respectively 18,563,814 15 19,051,156 15
----------- --- ---------- ---
32,195,102 26 30,853,039 25
----------- --- ---------- ---
Certificate accounts:
3.00% to 4.00% 5,185,334 4 346,558
4.01 to 5.00 16,878,626 13 5,910,423 5
5.01 to 6.00 25,582,590 20 49,133,334 40
6.01 to 7.00 32,519,483 26 26,749,612 22
7.01 to 8.00 8,725,578 7 6,713,609 5
8.01 to 9.00 4,647,321 4 3,195,265 3
9.01 to 10.00 605,792 351,223
10.01 to 11.00 100,000
----------- --- ---------- ---
94,244,724 74 92,400,024 75
------------ --- ------------ ---
$126,439,826 100 $123,253,063 100
============ === ============ ===
</TABLE>
Weighted average interest rate
paid on deposits during the year 5.47% 5.96%
==== ====
As of June 30, 1995 and 1996, individual customer's deposits were
collateralized by mortgage-related securities with an amortized cost of
approximately $275,946 and $222,157 and a market value of approximately
$273,684 and $213,698, respectively.
Certificate accounts mature as follows:
Fiscal Year Amount
1997 $54,496,028
1998 20,218,920
1999 8,431,515
2000 4,015,947
2001 2,204,312
Thereafter 3,033,302
----------
$92,400,024
===========
F-22
<PAGE>
A summary of interest expense by deposit type is as follows:
1994 1995 1996
Passbook savings deposits $ 326,080 $ 296,669 $ 251,754
NOW accounts and money market
demand deposits 677,188 857,681 977,893
Certificate accounts 5,135,457 5,144,010 5,563,235
---------- ---------- ----------
$6,138,725 $6,298,360 $6,792,882
========== ========== ==========
11. INCOME TAXES
1994 1995 1996
Currently paid or payable $ 123,000 $ 243,448 ($311,663)
Deferred (78,000) 40,000 (3,506)
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 45,000 $ 283,448 ($315,169)
========== ========== ==========
Income tax expense (benefit) has been provided at effective rates of 10.8%,
32.0% and (51.0%) for the years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996,
respectively. The differences between such effective rates and the
statutory Federal income tax rate computed on income before income tax
expense and extraordinary items result from the following:
1994 1995 1996
Amount % Amount % Amount %
Federal income tax
expense computed at
statutory rate $141,962 34.0 $301,334 34.0 $208,478 34.0
Increases (decreases)
in taxes resulting
from:
Reversal of excess
tax accrual (601,245) (98.0)
Allowance for bad
debts (25,610) (6.1) (21,418) (2.4)
State income taxes
(net of federal
benefit) 21,597 5.2 40,788 4.6 27,938 4.6
Change in deferred
tax asset valuation
allowance (99,807) (23.9) (54,584) (6.2) (848)
Acquisition costs 53,720 9.1
Other 6,858 1.6 17,328 2.0 (3,212) (0.7)
------- ---- ------- ---- --------- ------
$45,000 10.8 $382,448 32.0 $(315,169) (51.0)
======= ==== ======== ==== ========= ======
During the year, the Company reversed previously established accruals
relating to a tax position taken in prior years. The Company s 1991 and
1992 tax returns were filed with appropriate disclosure of the use of the
positions taken. As of March 15, 1996, the three year statue of limitations
expired. As a result of the reversal of previously established tax
liabilities, the Company recorded an after tax benefit of $601,245. Income
taxes payable as of June 30, 1996, without consideration of the benefit
derived from the statute expiration, is $112,332.
F-23
<PAGE>
Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from temporary differences in the
recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement
purposes. The sources of these differences and the tax effect of each were
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Accrued liabilities $(88,560) $ 44,600 $ 98,139
Unrealized loss on assets held
for sale (16,300) 16,300 3,506
Missouri intangible tax credit
carryforward 49,146 6,286
Valuation allowance (54,584) 848
Impairment loss on building (94,380)
Depreciation (2,899) (2,903)
Allowance for loan losses 30,820
Other (3,960) (12,563) (15,002)
-------- -------- --------
$(78,000) $ 40,000 $ (3,506)
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 1995
and 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses $124,060 $124,060
Accrued liabilities 105,190 7,051
Deferred compensation 17,733 49,725
Missouri intangible tax credit
carryforward 17,556 11,270
Provision for loss on regulatory matter 12,120 12,120
Unrealized loss on securities available
for sale 7,753 4,247
Impairment loss on building 94,380
Other 604
-------- --------
284,412 303,457
Valuation allowance (12,118) (11,270)
-------- --------
Deferred tax asset 272,294 292,187
-------- --------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends 157,870 157,870
Depreciation 30,431 33,334
Prepaid expenses 5,940 4,424
Other 1,053 23,065
-------- --------
Deferred tax liability 195,294 218,693
-------- --------
Deferred tax asset, net $ 77,000 $ 73,494
======== ========
</TABLE>
The State of Missouri and the Association reached a settlement agreement
during 1989 concerning the Association s claim for refund of intangible
taxes. The settlement agreement provided for the Association to recover its
initial claim of $523,500 through cash payments from a special fund or
credits against future state tax liabilities (without expiration).
F-24
<PAGE>
In 1994, 1995 and 1996, the Association received cash refunds of $84,180,
$40,662 and $5,300, respectively. Additionally, the Association applied
$15,627 and $32,600 of the remaining credits against current state income
tax liabilities in 1994 and 1995, respectively. As of June 30, 1996, there
were no remaining state tax credits to be received in cash or to offset
future state tax liabilities. As a result, in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
the Missouri intangible tax credit carryforward is considered a temporary
difference for which a 100% valuation allowance has been provided as of
June 30, 1996.
12. ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
A summary of advances is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 1995 June 30, 1996
Weighted Weighted
Fiscal Average Fiscal Average
Year Interest Year Interest
Maturity Amount Rate Maturity Amount Rate
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996 $14,850,000 6.33% 1997 $2,500,000 6.52%
1997 2,500,000 6.52 1998 2,000,000 5.80
1998 2,000,000 5.80 2000 2,500,000 5.95
2000 2,500,000 5.95
----------- ---- ---------- ----
$21,850,000 6.26% $7,000,000 6.11%
=========== ==== ========== ====
</TABLE>
The advances are collateralized as of June 30, 1995 and 1996 by the pledge
of certain mortgage-related securities with an amortized cost of
approximately $32,009,840 and $22,668,209 and a market value of
approximately $31,720,215 and $22,123,956, respectively.
During 1994, the Association entered into a line-of-credit agreement with
the Federal Home Loan Bank wherein the Association can borrow up to
$7,000,000. As of June 30, 1995, included in advances was an outstanding
balance on the line of credit of $2,850,000. There was no outstanding
balance as of June 30, 1996. The interest rate related to the line-of-
credit reprices daily and had a weighted average rate of 5.56% and 5.98%
during the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1996. The line of credit agreement
expires January 25, 1997.
13. BENEFIT PLANS
Investment Plan Under Section 401(k) - The Association sponsors an
investment Plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code which is
available to eligible employees. Employees may contribute up to a specified
percentage of their annual salary and the Association will match the
employee contributions in an amount equal to 75% of the first 3% of annual
compensation contributed by the employees. The Association's contributions
under the Plan for the years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996 were
$19,343, $19,317 and $19,436, respectively.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan - The Company has an ESOP for the benefit of
Association employees who meet certain eligibility requirement which
include having completed 1,000 hours of service within a 12 month period
with the Company and having attained age 21. The ESOP Trust purchased
25,500 shares of common stock in the Company's initial public offering with
proceeds from a loan from the Company. The Association makes cash
contributions to the ESOP on a quarterly basis sufficient to enable the
ESOP to make the required loan payments to the Company.
F-25
<PAGE>
The note payable referred to above bears interest at prime rate adjustable
annually with interest payable annually and principal payable in equal
annual installments over seven years. The loan is secured by the shares of
the stock purchased.
As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral and allocated to
qualified employees based on the proportion of debt service paid in the
year. The Company accounts for its ESOP in accordance with AICPA Statement
of Position 93-6. Accordingly, the shares pledged as collateral are
reported as a reduction of stockholders' equity in the consolidated balance
sheet. As shares are released from collateral, the Company reports
compensation expense equal to the current market price of the shares, and
the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations.
Dividends on allocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of retained
earnings; dividends on unallocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction
of debt.
Compensation expense for the ESOP was $14,375, $34,511 and $42,185 for the
years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996
<S> <C> <C>
Shares released for allocation 1,913 3,643
Allocated shares 2,976 3,643
Unreleased shares 20,611 18,214
-------- --------
Total ESOP shares 25,500 25,500
======== ========
Fair value of unreleased shares $252,485 $368,843
======== ========
</TABLE>
Management Recognition Plan - The Association has adopted an MRP for
officers and directors to enable the Association to attract and retain
experienced and capable personnel in key positions of responsibility. A
total of 15,300 shares of restricted stock were allocated to the Plan on
January 7, 1994. As of June 30, 1995 and 1996, 14,025 and 14,620 shares,
respectively have been awarded and 1,275 and 680 shares, respectively
remain unallocated. The MRP shares purchased in the conversion are excluded
from stockholders equity until the shares vest to the participants. The
Association recognizes compensation expense in the amount of the fair
market value of the common stock, which was fixed at the grant date
(January 7, 1994), pro rata over the three years during which the shares
vest and records an addition to stockholders equity. Compensation expense
attributable to the MRP was $25,500 in 1994 and $51,000 in 1995 and 1996,
respectively. The shares are entitled to all voting and other stockholder
rights, except that the shares, while restricted, cannot be sold, pledged
or otherwise disposed of, and are required to be held in escrow.
If a holder of restricted stock under the MRP terminates employment for
reasons other than death, disability, retirement or change of control in
the Company, such employee forfeits all rights to any allocated shares
which are still restricted. If termination is caused by death, disability,
retirement or change in control of the Company, all allocated shares become
unrestricted.
Stock Option and Incentive Plan - In connection with the conversion, the
Company s Board of Directors adopted the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan (the Plan ). Pursuant to the Plan, stock options for 51,342 shares of
common stock have been reserved and may be granted to employees and
F-26
<PAGE>
nonemployee directors of the Company and its subsidiary. Options granted
under the Plan may be either incentive stock options as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code or options that do not so qualify. Options issued
under the Plan are exercisable for a ten year period (five years under
certain circumstances) and the exercise price may not be less than 100%
(110% under certain circumstances) of the market value of the shares at the
date of grant.
Information relative to the Plan is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Shares under option at beginning
of period 38,453 38,453
Granted:
$10 per share exercise price 38,453
$13 per share exercise price 8,000
$14 per share exercise price 2,000
------ ------ ------
Shares under option at end of
period 38,453 38,453 48,453
====== ====== ======
Options exercisable at end of period 33,050 38,453 48,453
====== ====== ======
Options available for grant at end
of period 12,889 12,889 2,889
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
As of June 30, 1996, the Association had commitments to originate loans
approximating $1,183,900 of which approximately $521,950 were fixed-rate
(interest ranging from 7.50% to 8.50%) and $661,950 were floating rate
commitments. As of June 30, 1995, the Association had commitments to
originate loans approximating $1,674,865 of which approximately $924,800
were fixed-rate (interest ranging from 7.625% to 9.25%) and $750,082 were
floating rate commitments. These commitments are agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in
the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Certain of the
commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn upon; the
total commitments amount disclosed above does not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. The Association evaluates each customer's
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained
if considered necessary by the Association upon extension of credit is
based on management s credit evaluation of the counterparty.
During the year ended June 30, 1996, a former employee of the Company filed
a sexual harassment suit against the Company. The suit was settled
resulting in an expense of $145,000 to the Company.
15. INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS
The Association was a party to two interest rate swap agreements which were
undertaken to manage the Association s exposure to interest rate risk with
respect to a group of short-term deposits.
F-27
<PAGE>
As of July 1, 1994, the Association had two interest rate swap agreements
outstanding with aggregate notional amounts of $5,000,000. The Association
was the fixed rate payor on both interest rate swap agreements. The
weighted average fixed rate payable was 6.74% and the weighted average
variable rate receivable was 3.125% as of June 30, 1993 on these interest
rate swap agreements. The swaps had a weighted average maturity of four
years and two months at inception and had a remaining weighted average
maturity of two years and seven months as of June 30, 1993.
During 1994, the Association terminated both of the swap agreements and
incurred related losses of $168,361. Such losses have been reflected as
interest expense in the consolidated statement of income during the year
ended June 30, 1994.
16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using
available market information and a selection from appropriate valuation
methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required to
interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly,
the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amount the
Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different
market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect
on the estimated fair value amounts.
The estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments as of June
30, 1995 and 1996 are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash and cash
equivalents $ 3,748 $ 3,748 $ 2,619 $ 2,619
Investment securities 2,498 2,468 2,000 1,988
Capital stock of
Federal Home Loan
Bank 1,848 1,848 1,886 1,886
Securities available
for sale 1,083 1,083 1,093 1,093
Mortgage-related
securities 68,941 68,664 51,520 51,173
Assets held for sale 773 773 484 484
Loans receivable 80,956 84,034 82,693 83,852
Liabilities:
Deposits 126,440 127,145 123,253 126,467
Accrued and other
liabilities 905 905 666 666
Advances from Federal
Home Loan Bank 21,850 21,780 7,000 6,913
</TABLE>
F-28
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 1995 June 30, 1996
Contract Estimated Contract Estimated
or Unrealized or Unrealized
Notional Gain Notional Gain
Amount (Loss) Amount (Loss)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Off-balance sheet
financial
instruments:
Commitments to
originate loans $1,675 $1,184
</TABLE>
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value
of the financial instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Accrued and Other Liabilities - The carrying
amounts of these items are a reasonable estimate of their fair value.
Investment Securities, Mortgage-Related Securities and Assets Available for
Sale - Estimated fair values of investments, mortgage-related securities
and assets available for sale are based on quoted market prices where
available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are
estimated using quoted market prices for similar instruments.
Capital Stock of Federal Home Loan Bank - The carrying value of capital
stock of Federal Home Loan Bank approximates its fair value. Transactions
in capital stock of FHLB have historically been settled at par value.
Loans Receivable - Fair values are estimated for portfolios with similar
financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type, such as single
family residential mortgage, multi-family residential mortgage,
nonresidential, commercial business and installment. Each loan category is
further segmented into fixed and variable interest rate categories. Future
cash flows of these loans are discounted using the current rates at which
similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and
for the same remaining maturities.
Deposits - The estimated fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts
is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The estimated fair
value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting
the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of
similar remaining maturities.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank - The estimated fair value of advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank is determined by discounting the future cash
flows of existing advances using rates currently available on advances from
Federal Home Loan Bank having similar characteristics.
Commitments to Originate Loans - The estimated fair value of commitments to
originate fixed-rate loans is determined based on the fees currently
charged to enter into similar agreements and the difference between current
levels of interest rates and the committed rates. Based on that analysis,
the estimated fair value of such commitments is a reasonable estimate of
the loan commitments at par.
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent
information available to management as of June 30, 1996 and 1995. Although
management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the
estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively
F-29
<PAGE>
revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date.
Therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from
the amounts presented herein.
17. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Parent Company Only)
Sentinel Financial Corporation was organized in September 1994 and began
operations on January 7, 1995. The Company s balance sheets as of June 30,
1995 and 1996 and the related statements of income and cash flows for years
ended June 30, 1995 and 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Condensed Balance Sheets
June 30, 1995 and 1996 1995 1996
<S> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash $ 227,183 $ 326,000
Due from subsidiary 282,614 189,429
Investment in Sentinel Federal Savings and
Loan Association of Kansas City 10,192,590 11,169,434
----------- ----------
Total assets $10,702,387 $11,684,863
=========== ===========
Liability and stockholders' equity:
Liability - income taxes payable $ 1,221 $ 1,221
Stockholders equity:
Serial preferred stock, $.01 par value;
500,000 shares authorized, no shares
issued or outstanding
Common stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000
shares authorized, 513,423 shares issued 5,134 5,134
Additional paid-in capital 4,602,678 4,627,459
Unearned compensation -
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (206,114) (163,929)
Retained earnings, substantially
restricted 6,299,468 7,214,978
----------- -----------
Total stockholders' equity 10,701,166 11,683,642
----------- -----------
Total liability and stockholders' equity $10,702,387 $11,684,863
=========== ===========
Condensed Statements of Income
For the Years Ended June 30, 1994,
1995 and 1996 1994 1995 1996
Interest income $ 8,717 $ 16,750 $ 16,940
General and administrative expenses (4,742) (20,149) (11,308)
----------- ----------- -----------
Income (loss) before equity in
undistributed earnings of Sentinel
Federal Savings and Loan Associa-
tion of Kansas City 3,975 (3,399) 5,632
Equity in undistributed earnings of
Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan
Association of Kansas City 559,560 633,226 922,708
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income $ 563,535 $ 629,827 $ 928,340
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
F-30
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended June 30, 1994,
1995 and 1996
1994 1995 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 563,535 $ 629,827 $ 928,340
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Equity in undistributed earnings
of Sentinel Federal Savings and
Loan Association of Kansas City (559,560) (633,226) (922,708)
Change in income taxes payable 2,000 (779)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities 5,975 (4,178) 5,632
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of Sentinel Federal
Savings and Loan Association of
Kansas City common stock (4,093,987)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of common stock 4,193,987
Reimbursement related to ESOP 14,375 34,511 42,185
Reimbursement related to Manage-
ment Recognition Plan 25,500 51,000 51,000
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing
activities 4,233,862 85,511 93,185
--------- --------- ---------
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 145,850 81,333 98,817
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning
of year 145,850 227,183
--------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 145,850 $ 227,183 $ 326,000
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
These statements should be read in conjunction with the other notes related
to the consolidated financial statements.
18. PROPOSED FEDERAL LEGISLATION
Legislation proposing a comprehensive reform of the banking and thrift
industries is under consideration by the U.S. Congress. The proposed
legislation would (i) impose a one-time assessment on thrift deposits of
approximately 0.68% of qualifying deposits to recapitalize the SAIF, the
fund which insures thrift deposits; (ii) merge the Bank Insurance Fund
("BIF") and the SAIF on January 1, 1998 at which time banks and thrifts
would pay the same deposit insurance premiums; (iii) require federal
savings associations to convert to a national bank or a state-chartered
thrift by January 1, 1998; and (iv) abolish the OTS. While there can be no
assurance that this proposed legislation will be effected, a one-time
assessment could have an adverse impact on the Company s results of
operations. Based on the estimated assessment of 0.68% and an assessment
date of June 30, 1996, the assessment could result in expense to the
Company of approximately $838,000.
F-31
<PAGE>
19. ACQUISITION
On March 22, 1996, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger
and Reorganization (the Agreement ) to merge with Roosevelt Financial
Group, Inc., the holding company of Roosevelt Bank ("Roosevelt"), a Federal
savings bank. The transaction would result in the merger of the Association
into Roosevelt Bank. Under the Agreement, the Association's shareholders
will receive 1.4231 shares of Roosevelt stock for each share of the
Company's common stock. The transaction is subject to Company shareholder
and regulatory approvals. The consolidated financial statements do not
reflect any purchase accounting adjustments that may result from the merger
transaction.
******
F-32
<PAGE>
APPENDIX I
------------------------
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND REORGANIZATION
by and among
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
ROOSEVELT BANK,
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
and
SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY
------------------------
----------------
MARCH 22, 1996
----------------
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
<C> <S> <C>
RECITALS ............................................................ 1
ARTICLE I. THE MERGER AND RELATED MATTERS.............................. 1
1.1 Merger; Resulting Institution.............................. 1
1.2 Effective Time of the Merger................................ 2
1.3 Company Merger.............................................. 2
1.4 Closing..................................................... 6
1.5 Reservation of Right to Revise Transaction.................. 6
ARTICLE II. REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS OF
SENTINEL FINANCIAL AND SENTINEL FEDERAL..................... 6
2.1 Organization and Authority.................................. 6
2.2 Subsidiaries................................................ 7
2.3 Capitalization.............................................. 7
2.4 Authorization............................................... 8
2.5 Sentinel Financial Statements............................... 9
2.6 Sentinel Reports............................................ 9
2.7 Properties and Leases....................................... 9
2.8 Taxes....................................................... 10
2.9 Material Adverse Change..................................... 10
2.10 Commitments and Contracts................................... 11
2.11 Litigation and Other Proceedings............................ 12
2.12 Insurance................................................... 12
2.13 Compliance with Laws........................................ 12
2.14 Labor....................................................... 14
2.15 Material Interests of Certain Persons....................... 14
2.16 Allowance for Loan Losses; Nonperforming Assets............. 14
2.17 Employee Benefit Plans...................................... 15
2.18 Conduct to Date............................................. 17
2.19 Prospectus/Proxy Statement, etc............................. 17
2.20 Registration Obligations.................................... 18
2.21 Takeover Provisions Not Applicable.......................... 18
2.22 Regulatory, Tax and Accounting Matters...................... 18
2.23 Brokers and Finders......................................... 18
2.24 Community Reinvestment Act Compliance....................... 19
2.25 Fairness Opinion............................................ 19
ARTICLE III. REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS OF
ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL AND ROOSEVELT BANK...................... 19
3.1 Organization and Authority.................................. 19
3.2 Capitalization of Roosevelt Financial....................... 19
3.3 Authorization............................................... 20
3.4 Roosevelt Financial Statements.............................. 21
3.5 Roosevelt Reports........................................... 21
3.6 Material Adverse Change..................................... 21
3.7 Litigation and Other Proceedings............................ 22
3.8 Compliance with Laws........................................ 22
3.9 Registration Statement, etc................................. 23
3.10 Brokers and Finders......................................... 24
3.11 Community Reinvestment Act Compliance....................... 24
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
ARTICLE IV. CONDUCT OF BUSINESSES PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME........... 24
4.1 Conduct of Businesses Prior to the Effective Time........... 24
4.2 Forbearances................................................ 24
ARTICLE V. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS....................................... 26
5.1 Access and Information...................................... 26
5.2 Registration Statement; Regulatory Matters.................. 27
5.3 Stockholder Approval........................................ 27
5.4 Current Information......................................... 28
5.5 Agreements of Affiliates.................................... 28
5.6 Expenses.................................................... 28
5.7 Miscellaneous Agreements and Consents....................... 28
5.8 Employee Agreements and Benefits............................ 29
5.9 Press Releases.............................................. 32
5.10 D&O Indemnification and Insurance........................... 32
5.11 Third Parties............................................... 32
5.12 Schedule 13D or 13G Filings................................. 32
5.13 Dissenting Shareholders' Appraisal Rights................... 33
5.14 Reservation of Shares....................................... 33
5.15 Nasdaq Listing.............................................. 33
5.16 Assistance with Third-Party Agreements...................... 33
5.17 Notices and Communications.................................. 33
5.18 Insurance Policies Assignment............................... 33
ARTICLE VI. CONDITIONS.................................................. 34
6.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the Merger.. 34
6.2 Conditions to Obligations of Sentinel Financial and
Sentinel Federal to Effect the Merger....................... 35
6.3 Conditions to Obligations of Roosevelt Financial and
Roosevelt Bank to Effect the Merger......................... 36
ARTICLE VII. TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER........................... 37
7.1 Termination................................................. 37
7.2 Effect of Termination....................................... 37
7.3 Amendment................................................... 38
7.4 Severability................................................ 39
7.5 Waiver...................................................... 39
ARTICLE VIII. GENERAL PROVISIONS.......................................... 39
8.1 Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements.. 39
8.2 Notices..................................................... 39
8.3 Miscellaneous............................................... 40
</TABLE>
Exhibit A - Form of Voting Agreement (intentionally omitted)
Exhibit B - Subsidiary Agreement and Plan of Merger (intentionally omitted)
ii
<PAGE>
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND REORGANIZATION
-----------------------------------------------
THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND REORGANIZATION (this "Agreement"),
dated March 22, 1996, is by and among ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., a
Delaware corporation ("Roosevelt Financial"), ROOSEVELT BANK, a federally
chartered savings bank and a wholly owned subsidiary of Roosevelt Financial
("Roosevelt Bank"), SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
("Sentinel Financial"), and SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF
KANSAS CITY, a federally chartered savings association and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Sentinel Financial ("Sentinel Federal").
A. Roosevelt Financial, Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
Federal wish to provide for the terms and conditions of the following described
business combination in which Sentinel Financial will be merged with Roosevelt
Financial (the "Company Merger"), followed immediately by the merger of Sentinel
Federal with Roosevelt Bank (the "Bank Merger") pursuant to the Subsidiary
Agreement and Plan of Merger, attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Subsidiary
Merger Agreement"). The surviving entity of the Bank Merger shall sometimes be
referred to herein as the "Surviving Bank." The Company Merger and the Bank
Merger are collectively referred to herein as the "Merger."
B. For federal income tax purposes, it is intended that the Company
Merger shall qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section
368(a)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the
Bank Merger shall qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section
368(a)(1)(A) or (D) of the Code and this Agreement shall constitute a plan of
reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code.
C. For accounting purposes, it is intended that the Merger shall be
accounted for as a pooling of interests.
D . The parties hereto desire to make certain representations, warranties,
covenants and agreements in connection with the Merger and also to prescribe
various conditions to the Merger.
E. Concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, and as
a condition and inducement to Roosevelt Financial's willingness to enter into
this Agreement, Roosevelt Financial and each of the directors of Sentinel
Financial have entered into voting agreements in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A (the "Voting Agreements").
Accordingly, and in consideration of the representations, warranties,
covenants, agreements and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER AND RELATED MATTERS
1.1 Merger; Resulting Institution. Subject to the terms and conditions of
-----------------------------
this Agreement, and pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware General
Corporation Law (the "DGCL"), the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the "FDIA"),
the Home Owners' Loan Act (the "HOLA") and the rules and regulations promulgated
under the HOLA (the "Thrift Regulations"), (a) at the Effective Time (as
hereinafter defined), Sentinel Financial shall be merged with and into Roosevelt
Financial pursuant to the
I-1
<PAGE>
terms and conditions set forth herein and (b) thereafter, at the Bank Merger
Effective Time (as hereinafter defined), Sentinel Federal shall be merged with
Roosevelt Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Subsidiary
Merger Agreement. Upon the consummation of the Company Merger, the separate
corporate existence of Sentinel Financial shall cease and Roosevelt Financial
shall continue as the surviving corporation. The name of Roosevelt Financial,
as the resulting institution of the Company Merger shall remain "Roosevelt
Financial Group, Inc." From and after the Effective Time, Roosevelt Financial,
as the surviving corporation of the Company Merger, shall possess all of the
properties and rights and be subject to all of the liabilities and obligations
of Roosevelt Financial and Sentinel Financial, all as more fully described in
the DGCL. The Bank Merger will be consummated pursuant to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Subsidiary Merger Agreement.
1.2 Effective Time of the Merger. As soon as practicable after each of
----------------------------
the conditions set forth in Article 6 hereof have been satisfied or waived, the
parties will file, or cause to be filed, with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware and the Office of Thrift Supervision (the "OTS") such
certificates of merger, articles of combination and other documents as they may
deem necessary or appropriate for the Company Merger and the Bank Merger, which
certificates of merger, articles of combination and other documents shall in
each case be in the form required by and executed in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the DGCL and the Thrift Regulations, respectively. The
Company Merger shall become effective at the time the certificate of merger for
such merger is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the
"Effective Time"), which, if practicable, shall be on the same day as the
Closing (as defined in Section 1.4 hereof) or at such other date and time as may
be agreed to by the parties and specified in the certificate of merger in
accordance with applicable law. The Bank Merger shall become effective at the
time the articles of combination for such merger are endorsed by the Secretary
of the OTS pursuant to the Thrift Regulations (the "Bank Merger Effective
Time"). The parties shall cause the Company Merger to become effective
immediately prior to the Bank Merger.
1.3 Company Merger.
--------------
(a) Conversion of Sentinel Financial Common Stock. At the Effective
---------------------------------------------
Time:
(i) Each share of common stock of Sentinel Financial, $.01 par
value per share (the "Sentinel Financial Common Stock"), issued and
outstanding immediately prior thereto (except for Dissenting Shares,
if applicable, as defined in Section 1.3(c) hereof) shall, by virtue
of the Company Merger and without any action on the part of the holder
thereof, but subject to Section 1.3(e) hereof, be converted into the
right to receive from Roosevelt Financial 1.4231 shares (the "Exchange
Ratio") of common stock of Roosevelt Financial, par value $.01 per
share ("Roosevelt Financial Common Stock"). The foregoing sentence
notwithstanding:
(A) if the weighted average sale price of all Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq National Market during
the ten trading days ending on the date that is three trading days
prior to the Closing Date (the "Average Pre-Closing Trading
Price") is less than $15.83 per share (the "Minimum Average
Price"), the Exchange Ratio shall be equal to $22.525 divided by
the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price; and
(B) if the Average Pre-Closing Trading Price is greater
than $21.42 per share (the "Maximum Average Price"), the Exchange
Ratio shall be equal to $30.475 divided by the Average Pre-Closing
Trading Price.
I-2
<PAGE>
In the event, subsequent to the date of this Agreement but prior
to the Effective Time, of a reclassification, recapitalization, stock
dividend, stock split or reverse stock split with respect to the
outstanding shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock, a conversion of
the outstanding shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock into other
securities, or the establishment of a date during such period as the
record date for determining holders of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock
with respect to any of the foregoing, then the Exchange Ratio, the
Minimum Average Price and/or the Maximum Average Price, as appropriate,
shall be appropriately adjusted.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, any shares
of Sentinel Financial Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time which are then owned beneficially or of
record by Roosevelt Financial, Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel Financial,
Sentinel Federal or by any direct or indirect Subsidiary (as
hereinafter defined) of any of them or held in the treasury of Sentinel
Financial (other than any shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock
held (A) directly or indirectly in trust accounts, managed accounts and
the like, or otherwise held in a fiduciary capacity, that are
beneficially owned by third parties or (B) in respect of a debt
previously contracted) shall, by virtue of the Company Merger, be
canceled without payment of any consideration therefor and without any
conversion thereof.
(ii) Each share of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock issued and
outstanding or held in treasury immediately prior to the Effective
Time shall remain issued and outstanding or held in treasury and
continue to be an identical issued and outstanding or treasury share
of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock after the Effective Time.
(iii) The holders of certificates representing shares of Sentinel
Financial Common Stock shall cease to have any rights as stockholders
of Sentinel Financial, except such rights, if any, as they may have
pursuant to the DGCL. Except as provided above, until certificates
representing shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock are surrendered
for exchange, each such certificate shall, after the Effective Time,
represent for all purposes only the right to receive the number of
whole shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock into which their
shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock shall have been converted by
the Company Merger as provided above and the right to receive the cash
value of any fraction of a share of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock
as provided below (collectively, the "Merger Consideration").
(b) Reservation of Shares. Prior to the Effective Time, the Board of
---------------------
Directors of Roosevelt Financial shall reserve for issuance a sufficient
number of shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock for the purpose of
issuing its shares to Sentinel Financial's stockholders in accordance
herewith.
(c) Dissenting Shares. Any shares of Sentinel Financial Common
-----------------
Stock held by a holder who shall not have voted such shares in favor of the
Company Merger and who shall have complied with the applicable procedures
of Section 262 of the DGCL (if applicable) and becomes entitled to obtain
payment for the appraised value of such shares pursuant to Section 262 of
the DGCL (if applicable) shall be herein called "Dissenting Shares."
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, any Dissenting
Shares shall not, after the Effective Time, be entitled to vote for any
purpose or receive any dividends or other distributions and shall be
entitled only to such rights as are afforded in respect of Dissenting
Shares pursuant to the DGCL. All
I-3
<PAGE>
payments in respect of Dissenting Shares shall be from funds of Roosevelt
Financial and not from the acquired assets of Sentinel Financial.
(d) Exchange of Sentinel Financial Common Stock
-------------------------------------------
(i) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Time,
but in no event later than ten days after the Effective Time, holders
of record of certificates formerly representing shares of Sentinel
Financial Common Stock (the "Certificates") shall be instructed to
tender such Certificates to an independent exchange agent to be
selected by Roosevelt Financial (the "Exchange Agent") pursuant to a
letter of transmittal that Roosevelt Financial shall deliver or cause
to be delivered to such holders. Such letter of transmittal shall
specify that risk of loss and title to Certificates shall pass only
upon acceptance of such Certificates by the Exchange Agent.
(ii) After the Effective Time, each holder of a Certificate that
surrenders such Certificate to the Exchange Agent will, upon
acceptance thereof by the Exchange Agent, be entitled to the Merger
Consideration payable in respect of the shares represented thereby.
(iii) The Exchange Agent shall accept Certificates upon compliance
with such reasonable terms and conditions as Roosevelt Financial or
the Exchange Agent may impose to effect an orderly exchange thereof in
accordance with customary exchange practices. Certificates shall be
appropriately endorsed or accompanied by such instruments of transfer
as Roosevelt Financial or the Exchange Agent may reasonably require.
(iv) Each outstanding Certificate, other than those representing
Dissenting Shares, shall, until duly surrendered to Roosevelt
Financial or the Exchange Agent, be deemed to evidence the right to
receive the Merger Consideration.
(v) After the Effective Time, holders of Certificates shall
cease to have rights with respect to the Sentinel Financial Common
Stock previously represented by such Certificates, and their sole
rights (other than the holders of Certificates representing Dissenting
Shares) shall be to exchange such Certificates for the Merger
Consideration. After the Effective Time, there shall be no further
transfer on the records of Sentinel Financial of Certificates, and if
such Certificates are presented to Sentinel Financial for transfer,
they shall be canceled against delivery of the Merger Consideration.
Roosevelt Financial shall not be obligated to deliver the Merger
Consideration to any holder of Sentinel Financial Common Stock until
such holder surrenders the Certificates as provided herein. No
dividends declared will be remitted to any person entitled to receive
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock under this Agreement until such
person surrenders the Certificate representing the right to receive
such Roosevelt Financial Common Stock, at which time such dividends
shall be remitted to such person, without interest and less any taxes
that may have been imposed thereon. Certificates surrendered for
exchange by any person constituting an "affiliate" of Sentinel
Financial for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act of 1933
and the rules and regulations thereunder (the "Securities Act") shall
not be exchanged for certificates representing Roosevelt Financial
Common Stock until Roosevelt Financial has received a written
agreement from such person as specified in Section 5.5. Neither the
Exchange Agent nor any party to this Agreement nor any affiliate
thereof shall be liable to any holder of Sentinel Financial Common
Stock
I-4
<PAGE>
represented by any Certificate for any consideration paid to a public
official pursuant to applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar
laws. Roosevelt Financial and the Exchange Agent shall be entitled to
rely upon the stock transfer books of Sentinel Financial to establish
the identity of those persons entitled to receive consideration
specified in this Agreement, which books shall be conclusive with
respect thereto. In the event of a dispute with respect to ownership
of stock represented by any Certificate, Roosevelt Financial and the
Exchange Agent shall be entitled to deposit any consideration in
respect thereof in escrow with an independent third party and
thereafter be relieved with respect to any claims thereto.
(e) No Fractional Shares. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
--------------------
Agreement, neither certificates nor scrip for fractional shares of
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock shall be issued in the Company Merger.
Each holder who otherwise would have been entitled to a fraction of a share
of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock shall receive in lieu thereof cash
(without interest) in an amount determined by multiplying the fractional
share interest to which such holder would otherwise be entitled by the
Roosevelt Share Price on the last business day preceding the Effective
Time. The "Roosevelt Share Price" shall mean the closing sale price of one
share of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq
National Market. No such holder shall be entitled to dividends, voting
rights or any other rights in respect of any fractional shares interest.
(f) Stock Options. The Sentinel Financial Corporation 1994 Stock
-------------
Option Plan and all amendments thereto included in Schedule 2.3 (the
"Sentinel Financial Option Plan") and each option granted thereunder
outstanding on the date hereof (including options granted to the non-
employee directors of Sentinel Financial pursuant to any amendment of the
Sentinel Financial Option Plan), included in Schedule 2.3, and remaining
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, at the Effective
Time, be assumed by Roosevelt Financial and each such option shall be
converted automatically into an option to purchase shares of Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock in an amount and at an exercise price determined as
provided below (and otherwise subject to the terms of the Sentinel
Financial Option Plan):
(i) The number of shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock to
be subject to the new option shall be equal to the product of the
number of shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock subject to the
original option and the Exchange Ratio, provided that any fractional
shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock resulting from such
multiplication shall be rounded to the nearest share; and
(ii) The exercise price per share of Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock under the new option shall be equal to the exercise price per
share of Sentinel Financial Common Stock under the original option
divided by the Exchange Ratio, provided that such exercise price shall
be rounded to the nearest cent.
The adjustment provided herein with respect to any options which are
"incentive stock options" (as defined in Section 422 of the Code) shall be
and is intended to be effected in a manner which is consistent with Section
424(a) of the Code. The duration and other terms of the new option shall be
the same as the original option, except that all references to Sentinel
Financial shall be deemed to be references to Roosevelt Financial.
(g) Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Surviving
--------------------------------------------------------
Corporation. The Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws of Roosevelt
-----------
Financial, as in effect immediately prior to
I-5
<PAGE>
the Effective Time, shall be the Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws of
Roosevelt Financial, as the surviving corporation of the Company Merger,
until either is thereafter amended in accordance with applicable law.
(h) Directors and Officers of the Surviving Corporation. The
---------------------------------------------------
directors and officers of Roosevelt Financial immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be the directors and officers of Roosevelt Financial,
as the surviving corporation of the Company Merger, until their respective
successors shall be duly elected and qualified or otherwise duly selected.
1.4 Closing. Subject to the provisions of Article 6 hereof, the closing
-------
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the "Closing") shall take
place as soon as practicable after satisfaction or waiver of all of the
conditions to Closing, and shall occur no later than 10:00 a.m. on the last
business day of the first calendar month following the satisfaction of all of
the conditions to Closing, at the executive offices of Roosevelt Financial or at
such other date, time and location as is mutually agreed to by Roosevelt
Financial and Sentinel Financial. The date on which the Closing actually occurs
is herein referred to as the "Closing Date".
1.5 Reservation of Right to Revise Transaction. Roosevelt Financial shall
------------------------------------------
have the unilateral right to change the method of effecting the Merger
(including without limitation the provisions of this Article I), to the extent
permitted by applicable law and to the extent it deems such change to be
desirable, provided, however, that no such change shall (a) alter or change the
amount or kind of the Merger Consideration or the treatment of stock options as
set forth in Section 1.3(f) and shares subject to forfeiture restrictions as set
forth in Section 5.8(b) hereof, (b) diminish the benefits to be received by the
directors, officers or employees of Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal as
set forth in this Agreement or in any other agreements between the parties made
in connection with this Agreement, (c) materially impede or delay the
consummation of the Company Merger or (d) adversely affect the tax treatment of
Sentinel Financial stockholders as a result of receiving the Merger
Consideration. Roosevelt may exercise this right of revision by giving written
notice thereof in the manner provided in Section 8.2 of this Agreement.
Roosevelt Financial may make, and Sentinel Financial's Board of Director's shall
approve and its duly authorized representative shall execute, such amendments as
are permitted by this Section 1.5.
ARTICLE II
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS
OF SENTINEL FINANCIAL AND SENTINEL FEDERAL
Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal represent and warrant to and
covenant with Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank as follows:
2.1 Organization and Authority. Sentinel Financial is a corporation duly
--------------------------
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Delaware, is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in all
jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or the conduct of its
business requires it to be so qualified, except where the failure to be so
qualified would not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition,
assets, deposit liabilities, results of operations or business (collectively,
the "Condition") of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, and has the corporate power and authority to own its
properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted.
The term "Subsidiary" when used with respect to any party means any entity
(including without limitation any corporation, partnership, joint venture or
other organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated) which is
consolidated with such party
I-6
<PAGE>
for financial reporting purposes. Sentinel Financial is registered as a savings
and loan holding company with the OTS under the HOLA. True and complete copies
of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Sentinel Financial and of the
Charter and Bylaws of Sentinel Federal, each as in effect on the date of this
Agreement, are set forth in Schedule 2.1 hereto.
2.2 Subsidiaries. Set forth in Schedule 2.2 is a complete and correct
------------
list of all Subsidiaries of Sentinel Financial (each a "Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary" and collectively the "Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries"). Other than
the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, there are no entities in which Sentinel
Financial has a five percent or greater direct or indirect equity or ownership
interest. All outstanding Equity Securities (as defined in Section 2.3) of each
Sentinel Financial Subsidiary, except as set forth on Schedule 2.2, are owned
directly or indirectly by Sentinel Financial. Except as set forth on Schedule
2.2, all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and are owned
directly or indirectly by Sentinel Financial free and clear of any lien, claim,
charge, option, encumbrance, agreement, mortgage, pledge, security interest or
restriction (each a "Lien") with respect thereto. Each of the Sentinel
Financial Subsidiaries is a corporation, savings association, or other entity
duly incorporated or organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the
laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation or organization, and has the corporate
power and authority to own or lease its properties and assets and to carry on
its business as it is now being conducted. Each of the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries is duly qualified to do business in each jurisdiction where its
ownership or leasing of property or the conduct of its business requires it so
to be qualified, except where the failure to be so qualified, individually or in
the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on the Condition of
Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Except as set forth on Schedule 2.2 and except for shares of stock of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (the "FHL Bank"), Sentinel Financial does
not own beneficially, directly or indirectly, any shares of any class of Equity
Securities or similar interests of any corporation, bank, business trust,
association or similar organization. Sentinel Federal is a federally chartered
stock savings association. The deposits of Sentinel Federal are insured up to
applicable limits by the Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF") of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"). Sentinel Federal is a
member of the FHL Bank. Sentinel Federal is a "domestic building and loan
association" as defined in Section 7701(a)(19) of the Code. Except as set forth
on Schedule 2.2, neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary holds any interest in a partnership or joint venture of any kind.
2.3 Capitalization. The authorized capital stock of Sentinel Financial
--------------
consists of (i) 2,000,000 shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock, of which,
as of the date hereof, 513,423 shares are issued and outstanding (exclusive of
shares that are held in the treasury of Sentinel Financial and not subject to
conversion pursuant to Section 1.3(a)(i) hereof) and (ii) 500,000 shares of
preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, of which none are issued or
outstanding. As of the date hereof, Sentinel Financial had reserved 51,342
shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock for issuance under the Sentinel
Financial Option Plan, pursuant to which options covering 48,453 shares of
Sentinel Financial Common Stock are outstanding as of the date hereof (including
6,000 options granted to non-employee directors of Sentinel Financial on October
18, 1995). Schedule 2.3 includes a copy of the Sentinel Financial Option Plan,
each form of agreement entered into by Sentinel Financial with respect thereto
and a list of the names of all optionees and the numbers of shares, exercise
prices and vesting and expiration dates of their respective options. Since June
30, 1995, no Equity Securities of Sentinel Financial have been issued, other
than shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock which may have been issued
pursuant to the Sentinel Financial Option Plan. Except as set forth above,
there are no other Equity Securities of Sentinel Financial outstanding. "Equity
Securities" of an issuer means capital stock or other equity securities of such
issuer, options, warrants, scrip, rights to subscribe to, calls or commitments
of any character whatsoever relating to, or securities or rights convertible
into, shares of any capital stock or other equity securities of such issuer, or
contracts, commitments, understandings or arrangements by which such issuer is
or may become bound
I-7
<PAGE>
to issue additional shares of its capital stock or other equity securities of
such issuer, or options, warrants, scrip or rights to purchase, acquire,
subscribe to, calls on or commitments for any shares of its capital stock or
other equity securities. All of the issued and outstanding shares of Sentinel
Financial Common Stock are validly issued, fully paid, and nonassessable, and
have not been issued in violation of any preemptive right of any stockholder of
Sentinel Financial.
2.4 Authorization.
-------------
(a) Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal have the corporate power
and authority to enter into this Agreement and, subject to the approval of
this Agreement by the stockholders of Sentinel Financial, to carry out
their obligations hereunder. The only stockholder vote required for
Sentinel Financial to approve this Agreement is the affirmative vote of the
holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Sentinel
Financial Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. The execution, delivery
and performance of this Agreement by Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
Federal and the consummation by Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal of
the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by the
Boards of Directors of Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal. Subject to
the approval of Sentinel Financial's stockholders and subject to the
receipt of such approvals of Regulatory Authorities (as defined in Section
2.6) as may be required by statute or regulation, this Agreement is a valid
and binding obligation of Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal
enforceable against Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal in accordance
with its terms, subject as to enforcement to bankruptcy, insolvency and
other similar laws of general applicability affecting creditors' rights and
to general equity principles.
(b) Neither the execution, delivery or performance by Sentinel
Financial and Sentinel Federal of this Agreement, nor the consummation by
Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal of the transactions contemplated
hereby, nor compliance by Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal with any
of the provisions hereof, will (i) violate or conflict with any term,
condition or provision of its certificate of incorporation, charter or
bylaws, (ii) violate, conflict with, or result in a breach of any
provisions of, or constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or
lapse of time or both, would constitute a default) under, or result in the
termination of, or accelerate the performance required by, or result in a
right of termination or acceleration of, or result in the creation of any
Lien upon any of the properties or assets of Sentinel Financial or any
Sentinel Financial Subsidiary under any of the terms, conditions or
provisions of, any note, bond, mortgage, indenture, deed of trust, license,
lease, agreement or other instrument or obligation to which Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary is a party or by which it
may be bound, or to which Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary or any of their properties or assets may be subject, or (iii)
subject to compliance with the statutes and regulations referred to in
subsection (c) of this Section 2.4, to the best knowledge of Sentinel
Financial and of each Sentinel Financial Subsidiary (collectively, the
"Best Knowledge of Sentinel"), violate any judgment, ruling, order, writ,
injunction, decree, statute, rule or regulation applicable to Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary or any of their respective
material properties or assets.
(c) Other than in connection or in compliance with the provisions of
the DGCL, the Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules and regulations thereunder (the "Exchange Act"), the securities or
blue sky laws of the various states or filings, consents, reviews,
authorizations, approvals or exemptions required under the Savings and Loan
Holding Company Act (the "Holding Company Act"), the FDIA, the HOLA, the
Thrift Regulations, the Bank Merger Act (the "BMA") and the Hart-Scott-
Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act"), no notice to,
filing with, exemption or review by, or authorization, consent or approval
of,
I-8
<PAGE>
any public body or authority is necessary on the part of Sentinel Financial
or Sentinel Federal for the consummation by them of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
2.5 Sentinel Financial Statements. The consolidated balance sheets of
-----------------------------
Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1995
and 1994 and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and
changes in stockholders' equity for each of the three years in the three-year
period ended June 30, 1995, together with the notes thereto, audited by Deloitte
& Touche LLP and included in Sentinel Financial's annual report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended June 30, 1995 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC"), and the unaudited consolidated condensed balance sheets
of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries as of September 30
and December 31, 1995, and the related unaudited consolidated condensed
statements of income and cash flows for the periods then ended, included in
Sentinel Financial's quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the periods then ended
(each, a "Sentinel Financial Form 10-QSB") as filed with the SEC (collectively,
the "Sentinel Financial Statements"), have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis ("GAAP")
(except for the omission of notes to unaudited statements and except for the
adoption of FASB 115 for the year ended June 30, 1994), present fairly the
consolidated financial position of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries at such dates, and the consolidated results of operations, cash
flows and changes in stockholders' equity of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel
Financial Subsidiaries for the periods stated therein and are derived from the
books and records of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries,
which are complete and accurate in all material respects and have been
maintained in accordance with good business practices. Neither Sentinel
Financial nor any of the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries has any material
contingent liabilities that are not described in the financial statements
described above.
2.6 Sentinel Reports. Since June 30, 1995, each of Sentinel Financial and
----------------
the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries has filed all material reports,
registrations and statements, together with any required material amendments
thereto, including, but not limited to, Forms 10-KSB (including Sentinel
Financial's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30,
1995), Forms 10-QSB, Forms 8-K and proxy statements, that it was required to
file with (i) the SEC, (ii) the OTS, (iii) the FHL Bank and the Federal Home
Loan Bank System, (iv) the FDIC and (v) any other federal, state, municipal,
local or foreign government, securities, banking, savings and loan, insurance
and other governmental or regulatory authority and the agencies and staffs
thereof (the entities in the foregoing clauses (i) through (v) being referred to
herein collectively as the "Regulatory Authorities" and individually as a
"Regulatory Authority"). All such reports and statements filed with any such
Regulatory Authority are collectively referred to herein as the "Sentinel
Reports." As of its respective date, each Sentinel Report complied in all
material respects with all of the rules and regulations promulgated by the
applicable Regulatory Authority and did not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading.
2.7 Properties and Leases. Except (i) as may be reflected in the Sentinel
---------------------
Financial Statements, (ii) any Lien for current taxes not yet delinquent and
(iii) with respect to assets classified as real estate owned, Sentinel Financial
and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries have good title free and clear of any
material Lien to all the real and personal property reflected in Sentinel
Financial's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1995 included in the
most recent Sentinel Financial Form 10-QSB and, in each case, all real and
personal property acquired since such date, except such real and personal
property as has been disposed of in the ordinary course of business. All leases
material to Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary, pursuant to
which Sentinel Financial or the Sentinel Financial Subsidiary is a lessee or
lessor of real or personal property, are valid and effective in accordance with
their respective terms, and there is not, under any of such leases, any material
existing default by
I-9
<PAGE>
Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary or any event which, with
notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute a material default by Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary. Substantially all of Sentinel
Financial's and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries' buildings, structures and
equipment in regular use are in good and serviceable condition, normal wear and
tear excepted. To the Best Knowledge of Sentinel, none of the buildings,
structures and equipment of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary violates or fails to comply in any material respect with any
applicable health, fire, environmental, safety, zoning or building laws or
ordinances or any restrictive covenant pertaining thereto.
2.8 Taxes. Except as set forth on Schedule 2.8, Sentinel Financial and
-----
each Sentinel Financial Subsidiary have timely filed or will timely (including
extensions) file all tax returns and reports required to be filed at or prior to
the Closing Date ("Sentinel Financial Returns"). Each of Sentinel Financial and
the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries has paid, or set up adequate reserves on the
Sentinel Financial Statements for the payment of, all taxes required to be paid
in respect of the periods covered by such returns and reports. To the Best
Knowledge of Sentinel, neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary will have any liability material to the Condition of Sentinel
Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, for any
such taxes in excess of the amounts so paid or reserves so established and no
deficiencies for any tax, assessment or governmental charge have been proposed,
asserted or assessed (tentatively or definitely) against any of Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary which would not be covered by
existing reserves. Except as set forth on Schedule 2.8, neither Sentinel
Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary is delinquent in the payment of
any tax, assessment or governmental charge, nor has it requested any extension
of time within which to file any tax returns in respect of any fiscal year which
have not since been filed and no requests for waivers of the time to assess any
tax are pending. No federal and state income tax returns of Sentinel Financial
and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries have been audited by the Internal
Revenue Service (the "IRS") or appropriate state tax authorities for the five
most recent full calendar years. There is no deficiency or refund litigation or
matter in controversy with respect to Sentinel Financial's Returns. Except as
set forth on Schedule 2.8, neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary (i) has extended or waived any statute of limitations on the
assessment of any tax due; (ii) is a party to any agreement providing for the
allocation or sharing of taxes (other than the allocation of federal income
taxes as provided by regulation 1.1552-1(a)(1) under the Code); (iii) is
required to include in income any adjustment pursuant to Section 481(a) of the
Code, by reason of a voluntary change in accounting method (nor has the IRS has
proposed any such adjustment or change of accounting method) or (iv) has filed a
consent pursuant to Section 341(f) of the Code or agreed to have Section
341(f)(2) of the Code apply.
2.9 Material Adverse Change. Except as set forth on Schedule 2.9, since
-----------------------
June 30, 1995, there has been no material adverse change in the Condition of
Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
provided however, that in determining whether a material adverse change has
occurred there shall be excluded any effect the cause of which is: (i) any
change in banking, tax and similar laws of general applicability or
interpretations thereof by courts or governmental authorities, (ii) any change
in GAAP or regulatory accounting requirements applicable to savings associations
or their holding companies generally, (iii) any changes in general economic
conditions affecting financial institutions generally, including, but not
limited to, changes in interest and deposit rates, (iv) a special assessment on
SAIF members or other action taken by the FDIC in connection with the funding of
the SAIF, or (v) any action or omission of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary taken pursuant to the written request of Roosevelt
Financial.
I-10
<PAGE>
2.10 Commitments and Contracts.
-------------------------
(a) Except as set forth on Schedule 2.10 (and with a true and
correct copy of the document or other item in question attached to such
Schedule), neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
is a party or subject to any of the following (whether written or oral,
express or implied):
(i) any agreement, arrangement or commitment (A) not made in the
ordinary course of business, (B) by virtue of which the consent or
approval of any third party (other than a Regulatory Authority) is
required for or in connection with the execution, delivery and
performance of this Agreement or the consummation of the Merger or (C)
pursuant to which Sentinel Financial or any of the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries is or may become obligated to invest in or contribute
capital to any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary or any other entity;
(ii) any agreement, indenture or other instrument not disclosed
in the Sentinel Financial Statements relating to the borrowing of
money by Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary or
the guarantee by Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary of any such obligation (other than trade payables or
instruments related to transactions entered into in the ordinary
course of business by any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary, such as
deposits, Fed Funds borrowings, FHL Bank advances and repurchase
agreements);
(iii) any contract, agreement or understanding with any labor
union or collective bargaining organization;
(iv) any contract containing covenants which limit the ability of
Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary to compete in
any line of business or with any person or containing any restriction
of the geographical area in which, or method by which, Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary may carry on its
business (other than as may be required by law or any applicable
Regulatory Authority);
(v) any off-balance sheet financial instruments, including without
limitation letters of credit, unfunded commitments (other than
unfunded commitments made in the ordinary course of business and
consistent with past practice) and derivative financial instruments;
(vi) any contract or agreement which is a "material contract"
within the meaning of Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K promulgated by
the SEC that is not listed under Item 13 of Sentinel Financial's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1995; or
(vii) any contract or agreement (A) not terminable by Sentinel
Financial or any of its Subsidiaries on 30 or fewer days' notice or
(B) involving annual payments by or to them aggregating $25,000 or
more.
(b) Neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
is in violation of its certificate of incorporation, charter or bylaws or
in default under any agreement, commitment, arrangement, lease, insurance
policy, or other instrument, and there has not occurred any event that,
with the lapse of time or giving of notice or both, would constitute such a
default, except in
I-11
<PAGE>
each case where such violation or default would not have a material adverse
effect on the Condition of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
2.11 Litigation and Other Proceedings. Other than as set forth on Schedule
--------------------------------
2.11, there is no claim, action, suit, investigation or proceeding, pending or,
to the Best Knowledge of Sentinel, threatened against Sentinel Financial or any
Sentinel Financial Subsidiary, nor are they subject to any order, judgment or
decree, except for matters which do not involve a claim for damages for more
than $50,000 or for non-monetary relief, but not excepting any actions, suits or
proceedings which purport or seek to enjoin or restrain the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, except as set forth on Schedule 2.11, there are no actions, suits, or
proceedings pending or, to the Best Knowledge of Sentinel, threatened against
Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary or any of their
respective officers or directors by any stockholder of Sentinel Financial or any
Sentinel Financial Subsidiary (or by any former stockholder of Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary relating to or arising out of
such person's status as a stockholder or former stockholder) or involving claims
under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the Community Reinvestment Act of
1977 (the "CRA") or the fair lending laws.
2.12 Insurance. Each of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial
---------
Subsidiaries has taken or will timely take all requisite action (including
without limitation the making of claims and the giving of notices) pursuant to
its directors' and officers' liability insurance policy or policies in order to
preserve all rights thereunder with respect to all matters (other than matters
arising in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby) occurring prior to the Effective Time that are known to Sentinel
Financial. Set forth on Schedule 2.12 is a list of all insurance policies
(excluding policies maintained on one- to four-family residential properties
acquired through foreclosure) maintained by or for the benefit of Sentinel
Financial or any of the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries or their respective
directors, officers, employees or agents. Neither Sentinel Financial nor any
of the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries has, during the past three years, had an
insurance policy canceled or been denied insurance coverage for which any of
such companies has applied.
2.13 Compliance with Laws.
--------------------
(a) Sentinel Financial and each of the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries have all material permits, licenses, authorizations, orders
and approvals of, and have made all material filings, applications and
registrations with, all Regulatory Authorities that are required in order
to permit them to own or lease their properties and assets and to carry on
their business as presently conducted, except where the failure to have all
such permits, licenses, authorizations, orders and approvals or to have
made all such filings would not have a material adverse effect on the
Condition of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole; all such permits, licenses, authorizations, orders and
approvals are in full force and effect and, to the Best Knowledge of
Sentinel, no suspension or cancellation of any of them is threatened; and
all such filings, applications and registrations are current.
(b) (i) Each of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries has complied with all laws, regulations and orders (including
without limitation zoning ordinances, building codes, the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), and securities, tax,
environmental, civil rights, and occupational health and safety laws and
regulations, and including without limitation, in the case of any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary that is a savings bank or savings and loan
association, banking organization, banking corporation or trust company,
all statutes, rules, regulations and policy statements pertaining to the
conduct of a banking, deposit-taking, lending or related business, or to
the exercise of trust powers) and governing
I-12
<PAGE>
instruments applicable to them and to the conduct of their business, except
such noncompliance as, individually and in the aggregate, would not have a
material adverse effect on the Condition of Sentinel Financial and the
Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and (ii) neither
Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary is in default
under, and no event has occurred which, with the lapse of time or notice or
both, could result in a default under, the terms of any judgment, order,
writ, decree, permit, or license of any Regulatory Authority or court,
whether federal, state, municipal, or local and whether at law or in
equity, except such defaults as, individually and in the aggregate, would
not have a material adverse effect on the Condition of Sentinel Financial
and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. Except as set
forth in Schedule 2.13B, neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary is subject to or reasonably likely to incur a
liability as a result of its past or present ownership, operation, or use
of any Property (as defined below) of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary (whether directly or, to the Best Knowledge of
Sentinel, as a consequence of such Property being part of the investment
portfolio of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary) (A)
that is contaminated by or contains any hazardous waste, toxic substance,
or related materials, including without limitation asbestos, PCBs,
pesticides, herbicides, and any other substance or waste that is hazardous
to human health or the environment (collectively, a "Toxic Substance"), or
(B) on which any Toxic Substance has been stored, disposed of, placed, or
used in the construction thereof; and which, in any such case or in the
aggregate, reasonably could be expected to have a material adverse effect
on the Condition of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. "Property" of a person shall include all
property (real or personal) owned, leased or controlled by such person,
including without limitation property under foreclosure, property held by
such person or any Subsidiary of such person in its capacity as a trustee
and property in which any venture capital or similar unit of such person or
any Subsidiary of such person has an interest. No claim, action, suit, or
proceeding is pending against Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary relating to Property of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary before any court or other Regulatory Authority or
arbitration tribunal relating to hazardous substances, pollution, or the
environment, and there is no outstanding judgment, order, writ, injunction,
decree, or award against or, to the Best Knowledge of Sentinel, materially
adversely affecting Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
with respect to the same. Except for statutory or regulatory restrictions
of general application, no Regulatory Authority has placed any restriction
on the business of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
which reasonably could be expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Condition of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole.
(c) Since June 30, 1995, except as set forth on Schedule 2.13C,
neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary has
received any notification or communication as to any matter which has not
been resolved from any Regulatory Authority (i) asserting that Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary is not in substantial
compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances that such
Regulatory Authority enforces, except with respect to matters which
reasonably could not be expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Condition of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, (ii) threatening to revoke any license, franchise, permit
or governmental authorization that is material to the Condition of Sentinel
Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
including without limitation Sentinel Federal's status as an insured
depositary institution under the FDIA, or (iii) requiring or threatening to
require Sentinel Financial or any of the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries,
or indicating that Sentinel Financial or any of the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries may be required, to enter into a cease and desist order,
agreement or memorandum of understanding or any other agreement restricting
or limiting or purporting to direct, restrict or
I-13
<PAGE>
limit in any manner the operations of Sentinel Financial or any of the
Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, including without limitation any
restriction on the payment of dividends. No such cease and desist order,
agreement or memorandum of understanding or other agreement is currently in
effect.
(d) Except as a result of the conversion of Sentinel Federal from
mutual to stock form or the acquisition of control of Sentinel Federal by
Sentinel Financial, neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary is required by Section 32 of the FDIA to give prior notice to
any federal banking agency of the proposed addition of an individual to its
board of directors or the employment of an individual as a senior executive
officer.
2.14 Labor. No work stoppage involving Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel
-----
Financial Subsidiary is pending or, to the Best Knowledge of Sentinel,
threatened. Neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary is
involved in, or, to the Best Knowledge of Sentinel, threatened with or affected
by, any labor dispute, arbitration, lawsuit or administrative proceeding which
reasonably could be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Condition
of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
No employees of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary are
represented by any labor union or any collective bargaining organization.
2.15 Material Interests of Certain Persons.
-------------------------------------
(a) Except as set forth in Sentinel Financial's Proxy Statement for
its 1995 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to the Best Knowledge of Sentinel,
no officer or director of Sentinel Financial or any Subsidiary of Sentinel
Financial, or any "associate" (as such term is defined in Rule 14a-1 under
the Exchange Act) of any such officer or director, has any material
interest in any material contract or property (real or personal, tangible
or intangible), used in or pertaining to the business of Sentinel Financial
or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary, which in the case of Sentinel
Financial is required to be disclosed by Item 404 of Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC or in the case of any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
would be required to be so disclosed if such Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
had a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
(b) Except as set forth in Sentinel Financial's Proxy Statement for
its 1995 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or on Schedule 2.15, there are no
loans in excess of $100,000 from Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary to any present officer, director, employee or any
associate or related interest of any such person which was or would be
required under any rule or regulation to be approved by or reported to
Sentinel Financial's or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary's Board of
Directors ("Insider Loans"). All outstanding Insider Loans from Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary were approved by or reported
to the appropriate board of directors in accordance with applicable law and
regulations.
2.16 Allowance for Loan Losses; Nonperforming Assets.
-----------------------------------------------
(a) The allowances for loan losses contained in the Sentinel Financial
Statements were established in accordance with the past practices and
experiences of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries,
and the allowance for loan losses shown on the consolidated condensed
balance sheet of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries
contained in the most recent Sentinel Financial Form 10-QSB is, in the
opinion of management of Sentinel Financial, in compliance in all material
respects with the requirements GAAP and the rules, regulations and policies
of the OTS and is, in the opinion of management of Sentinel Financial,
I-14
<PAGE>
adequate to provide for possible losses on loans (including without
limitation accrued interest receivable) and credit commitments (including
without limitation stand-by letters of credit) outstanding as of the date
of such balance sheet.
(b) Except as set forth on Schedule 2.16B, the sum of the aggregate
amount of all Nonperforming Assets (as defined below) and all troubled debt
restructurings (as defined under GAAP) on the books of Sentinel Financial
and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries does not exceed $500,000 at the
date hereof. "Nonperforming Assets" shall mean (i) loans and leases
classified as nonperforming, (ii) assets classified as real estate owned
and other assets acquired through foreclosure, including in-substance
foreclosed real estate, and (iii) loans and leases that are on non-accrual
status, in each case under the definitions applied by the SEC, the OTS and
under GAAP, as appropriate.
2.17 Employee Benefit Plans.
----------------------
(a) Schedule 2.17A lists all pension, retirement, supplemental
retirement, stock option, restricted stock, stock purchase, stock
ownership, savings, stock appreciation right, profit sharing, employment,
deferred compensation, consulting, bonus, medical, disability, workers'
compensation, vacation, group insurance, severance and other material
employee benefit, incentive and welfare policies, contracts, plans and
arrangements, and all trust or loan agreements or arrangements related
thereto, maintained, sponsored or contributed to by Sentinel Financial or
any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary in respect of any of the present or
former directors, officers, or other employees of and/or consultants to
Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary (collectively,
"Sentinel Financial Employee Plans"). The following documents with respect
to each Sentinel Financial Employee Plan are included in Schedule 2.17A:
(i) a true and complete copy of all written documents comprising such
Sentinel Financial Employee Plan (including amendments and individual
agreements relating thereto) or, if there is no such written document, an
accurate and complete description of the Sentinel Financial Employee Plan;
(ii) the most recent Form 5500 or Form 5500-C (including all schedules
thereto), if applicable; (iii) the most recent financial statements and
actuarial reports, if any; (iv) the summary plan description currently in
effect and all material modifications thereof, if any; and (v) the most
recent IRS determination letter, if any. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, Sentinel Financial has furnished Roosevelt Financial with
true and complete copies of each form of stock option grant or stock option
agreement that is outstanding under any stock option plan of Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary. Craig D. Laemmli has
heretofore acknowledged to and agreed with Roosevelt Financial, in
consideration of its execution of this Agreement that, provided the
employment agreement referred to in Section 5.8(a) has superseded the
Existing Employment Arrangements (as defined below), (i) for purposes of
any employment contract or similar agreement of Mr. Laemmli with Sentinel
Financial or any of its Subsidiaries (an "Existing Employment
Arrangement"), neither the Merger nor his employment by Roosevelt Bank
after the Effective Time pursuant to the employment agreement referred to
in Section 5.8(a) hereof will constitute either an involuntary termination
or a change in control and neither will otherwise trigger, accelerate or
increase the amount of any compensation, benefits or other consideration
under any Existing Employment Arrangement and (ii) as of the Effective Time
all such employment contracts or similar agreements shall terminate without
any payment or penalty obligation and be superseded and replaced in their
entirety by the employment agreement referred to in Section 5.8(a) hereof.
(b) All Sentinel Financial Employee Plans have been maintained and
operated materially in accordance with their terms and with the material
requirements of all applicable
I-15
<PAGE>
statutes, orders, rules and final regulations, including without limitation
ERISA and the Code. All contributions required to be made to Sentinel
Financial Employee Plans have been made.
(c) With respect to each of the Sentinel Financial Employee Plans
which is a pension plan (as defined in Section 3(2) of ERISA) (the "Pension
Plans"): (i) each Pension Plan which is intended to be "qualified" within
the meaning of Section 401(a) of the Code is so qualified and, to the
extent a determination letter has been received from the IRS with respect
to any such Pension Plan, such determination letter may still be relied
upon, and each related trust is exempt from taxation under Section 501(a)
of the Code; (ii) the present value of all benefits vested and all benefits
accrued under each Pension Plan which is subject to Title IV of ERISA,
valued using the assumptions in the most recent actuarial report, did not,
in each case, as of the last applicable annual valuation date (as indicated
on Schedule 2.17A), exceed the value of the assets of the Pension Plan
allocable to benefits on a plan termination basis; (iii) there has been no
"prohibited transaction," as such term is defined in Section 4975 of the
Code or Section 406 of ERISA, which could subject any Pension Plan or
associated trust, or, to the Best Knowledge of Sentinel, Sentinel Financial
or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary, to any material tax or penalty; (iv)
no Pension Plan or any trust created thereunder has been terminated, nor
have there been any "reportable events" with respect to any Pension Plan,
as that term is defined in Section 4043 of ERISA since January 1, 1986; and
(v) no Pension Plan or any trust created thereunder has incurred any
"accumulated funding deficiency", as such term is defined in Section 302 of
ERISA (whether or not waived). No Pension Plan is a "multiemployer plan" as
that term is defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA. With respect to each
Pension Plan that is described in Section 4063(a) of ERISA (a "Multiple
Employer Pension Plan"): (i) neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary would have any liability or obligation to post a bond
under Section 4063 of ERISA if Sentinel Financial and all Sentinel
Financial Subsidiaries were to withdraw from such Multiple Employer Pension
Plan; and (ii) neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary would have any liability under Section 4064 of ERISA if such
Multiple Employer Pension Plan were to terminate.
(d) Neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
has any liability for any post-retirement health, medical or similar
benefit of any kind whatsoever, except as required by statute or
regulation.
(e) Neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
has any material liability under ERISA or the Code as a result of its being
a member of a group described in Sections 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the
Code.
(f) Neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary
has any material liability under the continuation of health care provisions
of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 or any
comparable state law.
(g) Except as set forth on Schedule 2.17G, neither the execution nor
delivery of this Agreement, nor the consummation of any of the transactions
contemplated hereby, will (i) result in any material payment (including
without limitation severance, unemployment compensation or golden parachute
payment) becoming due to any director or employee of Sentinel Financial or
any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary from any of such entities, (ii)
materially increase any benefit otherwise payable under any of the Sentinel
Financial Employee Plans or (iii) result in the acceleration of the time of
payment of any such benefit. No holder of an option to acquire stock of
Sentinel Financial has or will have at any time through the Effective Time
the right to receive any cash or other payment (other than as contemplated
by Section 1.3(f) hereof) in exchange for
I-16
<PAGE>
or with respect to all or any portion of such option. Sentinel Financial
shall use its best efforts to ensure that no amounts paid or payable by
Sentinel Financial, Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries or Roosevelt Financial
to or with respect to any employee or former employee of Sentinel Financial
or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary will fail to be deductible for federal
income tax purposes by reason of Section 280G of the Code or otherwise. No
such option has an associated "Additional Option Right" or other "re-load"
or "replacement option" feature.
2.18 Conduct to Date. From and after June 30, 1995 through the date of
---------------
this Agreement, except as set forth on Schedule 2.18 or in Sentinel Financial
Statements: (i) Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries have
conducted their respective businesses in the ordinary and usual course
consistent with past practices; (ii) neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary has issued, sold, granted, conferred or awarded any of its
Equity Securities (except shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock issued
pursuant to the exercise of options granted prior to the date hereof under the
Sentinel Financial Option Plan), or any corporate debt securities which would be
classified under GAAP as long-term debt on the balance sheets of Sentinel
Financial; (iii) Sentinel Financial has not effected any stock split or
adjusted, combined, reclassified or otherwise changed its capitalization; (iv)
Sentinel Financial has not declared, set aside or paid any dividend or other
distribution in respect of its capital stock, or purchased, redeemed, retired,
repurchased, or exchanged, or otherwise acquired or disposed of, directly or
indirectly, any of its Equity Securities, whether pursuant to the terms of such
Equity Securities or otherwise; (v) neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary has incurred any material obligation or liability (absolute
or contingent), except normal trade or business obligations or liabilities
incurred in the ordinary course of business, or subjected to Lien any of its
assets or properties other than in the ordinary course of business, (vi) neither
Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary has discharged or
satisfied any material Lien or paid any material obligation or liability
(absolute or contingent), other than in the ordinary course of business; (vii)
neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary has sold,
assigned, transferred, leased, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of any of its
properties or assets other than for a fair consideration (in the reasonable
opinion of management) and in the ordinary course of business; (viii) except as
required by contract or law, neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary has (A) increased the rate of compensation of, or paid any
bonus to, any of its directors, officers, or other employees, except merit or
promotion increases applicable to individual employees and annual increases
applicable to employees generally, all in accordance with past practice, or (B)
entered into any new, or amended or supplemented any existing, employment,
management, consulting, deferred compensation, severance, or other similar
contract, (C) entered into, terminated, or substantially modified any of the
Sentinel Financial Employee Plans or (D) agreed to do any of the foregoing; (ix)
neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary has suffered
any material damage, destruction, or loss, whether as the result of fire,
explosion, earthquake, accident, casualty, labor trouble, requisition, or taking
of property by any Regulatory Authority, flood, windstorm, embargo, riot, act of
God or war, or other casualty or event, and whether or not covered by insurance;
(x) other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary has canceled or
compromised any debt; (xi) other than in the ordinary course of business,
neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary has entered
into any material transaction, contract or commitment and (xii) neither Sentinel
Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary has made or guaranteed any loan
to any of the Sentinel Financial Employee Plans.
2.19 Prospectus/Proxy Statement, etc. None of the information regarding
--------------------------------
Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary supplied or to be
supplied in writing by Sentinel Financial for inclusion in (i) the registration
statement on Form S-4 to be filed with the SEC by Roosevelt Financial for the
purpose of registering the shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock to be
exchanged for shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement (the "Registration Statement"), (ii) the
prospectus/proxy statement to be mailed to stockholders in accordance with
Section
I-17
<PAGE>
5.3 (the "Prospectus/Proxy Statement") or (iii) any other documents to be filed
with any Regulatory Authority in connection with the transactions contemplated
hereby will, at the respective times such documents are filed with any
Regulatory Authority and, in the case of the Registration Statement, when it
becomes effective and, with respect to the Prospectus/Proxy Statement, when
mailed, be false or misleading with respect to any material fact, or omit to
state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein not
misleading or, in the case of the Prospectus/Proxy Statement or any amendment
thereof or supplement thereto, at the time of the meeting of Sentinel
Financial's stockholders referred to in Section 5.3, be false or misleading with
respect to any material fact, or omit to state any material fact necessary to
correct any statement in any earlier communication with respect to the
solicitation of any proxy for such meeting. All documents, if any, which
Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary is responsible for
filing with any Regulatory Authority in connection with the Merger will comply
as to form in all material respects with the provisions of applicable law.
2.20 Registration Obligations. Except as set forth on Schedule 2.20,
------------------------
neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary is under any
obligation, contingent or otherwise, which will survive the Effective Time by
reason of any agreement to register any of its securities under the Securities
Act or other federal or state securities laws or regulations.
2.21 Takeover Provisions Not Applicable. The transactions contemplated by
----------------------------------
this Agreement and the Voting Agreements are exempt from Section 203 of the DGCL
or any other Delaware takeover law. The Board of Directors of Sentinel
Financial has determined pursuant to Section E of Article XIV of Sentinel
Financial's Certificate of Incorporation, and hereby represents to Roosevelt
Financial, that (i) neither Roosevelt Financial nor any of the Roosevelt
Financial Subsidiaries are 10% or more "beneficial owners" of Sentinel Financial
Common Stock for purposes of such Article by virtue of the Voting Agreements,
this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby; and
(ii) Sentinel Financial has taken all steps necessary so that (a) neither
Roosevelt Financial nor any of its Subsidiaries will be deemed a "Related
Person" under Article XV of Sentinel Financial's Certificate of Incorporation
and (b) any takeover or similar provisions in the charter documents or bylaws of
Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal, including without limitation any
provisions thereof restricting the ownership, acquisition or voting of
securities or imposing any "fair price" or supermajority director or stockholder
vote requirements, will not apply to the Voting Agreements, this Agreement or
any of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.
2.22 Regulatory, Tax and Accounting Matters. Sentinel Financial has not
--------------------------------------
taken or agreed to take any action, nor does it have knowledge of any fact or
circumstance, that would (i) materially impede or delay the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the ability of the parties to
obtain any approval of any Regulatory Authority required for the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or to perform their covenants and agreements
under this Agreement or (ii) prevent the Merger from qualifying as a pooling of
interests for accounting purposes, the Company Merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code or the
Bank Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section
368(a)(1)(A) or (D) of the Code.
2.23 Brokers and Finders. Except as set forth in the agreement with
-------------------
Trident Financial Corporation ("Trident") dated March 1, 1996, which has not
been amended since such date, neither Sentinel Financial nor any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary nor any of their respective officers, directors or
employees has employed any broker or finder or incurred any liability for any
financial advisory fees, brokerage fees, commissions or finder's fees, and no
other broker or finder has acted directly or indirectly for Sentinel Financial
or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary, in connection with this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby.
I-18
<PAGE>
2.24 Community Reinvestment Act Compliance. Except as set forth on
-------------------------------------
Schedule 2.24, Sentinel Federal is in material compliance with the applicable
provisions of the CRA and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and, as of the
date hereof, Sentinel Federal has a CRA rating of satisfactory or better from
the OTS. To the Best Knowledge of Sentinel, there is no fact or circumstance or
set of facts or circumstances which would cause Sentinel Financial or any
Sentinel Financial Subsidiary to fail to comply with such provisions or cause
the CRA rating of Sentinel Federal to fall below satisfactory.
2.25 Fairness Opinion. Sentinel Financial has received from Trident a
----------------
fairness opinion, dated as of the date of this Agreement, to the effect that the
consideration to be received by the holders of Sentinel Financial Common Stock
pursuant to this Agreement is fair to such holders from a financial point of
view.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS
OF ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL AND ROOSEVELT BANK
Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank represent and warrant to and
covenant with Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal as follows:
3.1 Organization and Authority. Roosevelt Financial and each of its
--------------------------
Subsidiaries (each a "Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary" and collectively the
"Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries") is a corporation, savings bank or other
entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of
its jurisdiction of organization, is duly qualified to do business and is in
good standing in all jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or
the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified, except where the
failure to be so qualified would not have a material adverse effect on the
Condition of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, and has the corporate power and authority to own its properties and
assets and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. Roosevelt
Financial is registered as a savings and loan holding company with the OTS under
the HOLA. True and complete copies of the Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws of Roosevelt Financial and of the Charter and Bylaws of Roosevelt Bank,
each as in effect on the date of this Agreement, are set forth in Schedule 3.1.
3.2 Capitalization of Roosevelt Financial. The authorized capital stock
-------------------------------------
of Roosevelt Financial consists of (i) 90,000,000 shares of Roosevelt Financial
Common Stock, of which, as of December 31, 1995, 41,991,701 shares were issued
and outstanding and (ii) 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock, issuable in
series, of which 1,301,000 shares of 6 1/2% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock (the "Convertible Preferred") were issued or outstanding on such date, and
as of such date Roosevelt Financial had reserved 4,946,250 shares of Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock for issuance upon conversion of the Convertible
Preferred. As of the date hereof, Roosevelt Financial had reserved 4,650,000
shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock for issuance upon the exercise of
options ("Roosevelt Stock Options") under the Roosevelt Financial stock option
and incentive plans. Since December 31, 1994 through the date of this
Agreement, no other Equity Securities of Roosevelt Financial have been issued,
excluding any Roosevelt Stock Options and shares of Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock which may have been issued upon exercise of Roosevelt Stock Options or
conversion of the Convertible Preferred, any Restricted Stock and any shares of
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock issued in connection with the acquisition of
Kirksville Bancshares, Inc. Roosevelt Financial and its Subsidiaries
continually evaluate possible business combinations and may prior to the
Effective Time enter into one or more agreements providing for, and may
consummate, business combinations with other savings and loan holding companies
or other
I-19
<PAGE>
companies (or acquisitions of the assets thereof) for consideration that may
include Equity Securities. In addition, prior to the Effective Time, Roosevelt
Financial and its Subsidiaries may, depending on market conditions and other
factors, otherwise determine to issue equity, equity-linked or other securities
for financing purposes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as heretofore
disclosed to Sentinel Financial, Roosevelt Financial has not taken and will not
take any action and does not have knowledge of any fact or circumstance, that
would (i) materially impede or delay the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or the ability of Roosevelt Financial or Sentinel
Financial to obtain any approval of any Regulatory Authority required for the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or to perform its covenants and
agreements under this Agreement, (ii) prevent the Merger from qualifying as a
pooling of interests for accounting purposes, the Company Merger from qualifying
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code or
the Bank Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a)(1)(A) or (D) of the Code or (iii) make any of the representations
and warranties in Article III of this Agreement untrue or incorrect in any
material respect if made anew after engaging in such activity, entering into
such transaction, or taking such other act. Except as set forth above, there
are no other Equity Securities of Roosevelt Financial outstanding on the date
hereof. All of the issued and outstanding shares of Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock are validly issued, fully paid, and nonassessable, and have not been
issued in violation of any preemptive right of any stockholder of Roosevelt
Financial. At the Effective Time, the Roosevelt Financial Common Stock to be
issued in the Company Merger will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid
and non-assessable, and will not be issued in violation of any preemptive right
of any stockholder of Roosevelt Financial.
3.3 Authorization.
-------------
(a) Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank have the corporate power
and authority to enter into this Agreement and to carry out their
obligations hereunder. The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement by Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank and the consummation by
Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank of the transactions contemplated
hereby have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action of
Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank. Subject to the receipt of such
approvals of the Regulatory Authorities as may be required by statute or
regulation, this Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of Roosevelt
Financial and Roosevelt Bank enforceable against Roosevelt Financial and
Roosevelt Bank in accordance with its terms, subject as to enforcement to
bankruptcy, insolvency and other similar laws of general applicability
affecting creditors' rights and to general equity principles.
(b) Neither the execution, delivery or performance by Roosevelt
Financial and Roosevelt Bank of this Agreement, nor the consummation by
Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank of the transactions contemplated
hereby, nor compliance by Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank with any
of the provisions hereof, will (i) violate or conflict with any term,
condition or provision of its certificate of incorporation, charter or
bylaws, (ii) violate, conflict with or result in a breach of any provisions
of, or constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of
time or both, would constitute a default) under, or result in the
termination of, or accelerate the performance required by, or result in a
right of termination or acceleration of, or result in the creation of any
Lien upon any of the material properties or assets of Roosevelt Financial
or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary under any of the terms, conditions or
provisions of, (x) its articles or certificate of incorporation, charter or
bylaws, or (y) any material note, bond, mortgage, indenture, deed of trust,
license, lease, agreement or other material instrument or obligation to
which Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary is a party
or by which it may be bound, or to which Roosevelt Financial or any
Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary or any of their material property or assets
may be subject, or (ii) subject to compliance with the
I-20
<PAGE>
statutes and regulations referred to in subsection (c) of this Section 3.3,
to the Best Knowledge of Roosevelt Financial and of each Roosevelt
Financial Subsidiary (collectively, the "Best Knowledge of Roosevelt"),
violate any judgment, ruling, order, writ, injunction, decree, statute,
rule or regulation applicable to Roosevelt Financial or any of the
Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries or any of their respective material
properties or assets.
(c) Other than in connection with or in compliance with the
provisions of the DGCL, the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the
securities or blue sky laws of the various states or filings, consents,
reviews, authorizations, approvals or exemptions required under the Holding
Company Act, the FDIA, the HOLA, the Thrift Regulations, the BMA and the
HSR Act, or any required approvals of any other Regulatory Authority, no
notice to, filing with, exemption or review by, or authorization, consent
or approval of, any public body or authority is necessary on the part of
Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt Bank for the consummation by them of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
3.4 Roosevelt Financial Statements. The consolidated balance sheets of
------------------------------
Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries as of December 31,
1994 and related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in
stockholders' equity for each of the three years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1994, together with the notes thereto, audited by KPMG Peat Marwick
LLP and included in Roosevelt Financial's annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1994 as filed with the SEC, and the unaudited
consolidated condensed balance sheets of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt
Financial Subsidiaries as of September 30, 1995, and the related unaudited
consolidated condensed statements of income and cash flows for the periods then
ended included in Roosevelt Financial's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1995 as filed with the SEC (collectively, the
"Roosevelt Financial Statements"), have been prepared in accordance with GAAP
(except for the omission of notes to unaudited statements), present fairly the
consolidated financial position of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt
Financial Subsidiaries at such dates, and the consolidated results of
operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders' equity of Roosevelt
Financial and the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries for the periods stated
therein and are derived from the books and records of Roosevelt Financial and
the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries, which are complete and accurate in all
material respects and have been maintained in accordance with good business
practices. Neither Roosevelt Financial nor any of the Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiaries has any material contingent liabilities that are not described in
the financial statements described above.
3.5 Roosevelt Reports. Since December 31, 1994, each of Roosevelt
-----------------
Financial and the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries has filed all material
reports, registrations and statements, together with any required material
amendments thereto, that it was required to file with any Regulatory Authority.
All such reports and statements filed with any such Regulatory Authority are
collectively referred to herein as the "Roosevelt Reports." As of its
respective date, each Roosevelt Report complied in all material respects with
all of the applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the applicable
Regulatory Authority and, in the case of Roosevelt Reports filed pursuant to the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, did not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading.
3.6 Material Adverse Change. Except as set forth on Schedule 3.6, since
-----------------------
December 31, 1994, there has been no material adverse change in the Condition of
Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
except as may have resulted or may result from changes to laws and regulations,
generally accepted accounting principles or regulatory accounting principles or
changes in economic conditions applicable to depositary institutions generally.
I-21
<PAGE>
3.7 Litigation and Other Proceedings. Except as to matters set forth in
--------------------------------
the Roosevelt Reports, there is no claim, action, suit, investigation or
proceeding, pending or, to the Best Knowledge of Roosevelt, threatened against
Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary, nor are they subject
to any order, judgment or decree, except for matters which, in the aggregate,
will not have, or reasonably could not be expected to have, a material adverse
effect on the condition of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiaries, taken as whole, but not excepting any actions, suits or
proceedings which purport or seek to enjoin or restrain the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, except as to matters set forth in the Roosevelt Reports, there are no
actions, suits, or proceedings pending or, to the Best Knowledge of Roosevelt
Financial, threatened against Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiary or any of their respective officers or directors by any stockholder
of Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary (or by any former
stockholder of Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary
relating to or arising out of such person's status as a stockholder or former
stockholder) or involving claims under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the
CRA or the fair lending laws.
3.8 Compliance with Laws.
--------------------
(a) Roosevelt Financial and each of the Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiaries have all material permits, licenses, authorizations, orders
and approvals of, and have made all material filings, applications and
registrations with, all Regulatory Authorities that are required in order
to permit them to own or lease their properties and assets and to carry on
their business as presently conducted, except where the failure to have all
such permits, licenses, authorizations, orders and approvals or to have
made all such filings would not have a material adverse effect on the
Condition of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole; all such permits, licenses, authorizations, orders and
approvals are in full force and effect and, to the Best Knowledge of
Roosevelt, no suspension or cancellation of any of them is threatened and
all such filings, applications and registrations are current.
(b) Each of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiaries has complied with all laws, regulations and orders (including
without limitation zoning ordinances, building codes, ERISA, and
securities, tax, environmental, civil rights, and occupational health and
safety laws and regulations, and including without limitation, in the case
of any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary that is a savings bank, banking
organization, banking corporation or trust company, all statutes, rules,
regulations and policy statements pertaining to the conduct of a banking,
deposit-taking, lending or related business, or to the exercise of trust
powers) and governing instruments applicable to them and to the conduct of
their business, except as to matters set forth in the Roosevelt Reports or
where such failure to comply would not have a material adverse effect on
the Condition of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. Neither Roosevelt Financial nor any
Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary is in default under, and no event has
occurred which, with the lapse of time or notice or both, could result in a
default under, the terms of any judgment, order, writ, decree, permit, or
license of any Regulatory Authority or court, whether federal, state,
municipal, or local and whether at law or in equity, except such defaults
as, individually and in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse
effect on the Condition of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. Except as to matters set forth in the
Roosevelt Reports, neither Roosevelt Financial nor any Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiary is subject to or reasonably likely to incur a liability as a
result of its past or present ownership, operation, or use of any Property
of Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary (whether
directly or, to the Best Knowledge of Roosevelt Financial, as a consequence
of such Property being part of the investment portfolio of Roosevelt
Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary) (A) that is contaminated
by or contains
I-22
<PAGE>
any Toxic Substance, or (B) on which any Toxic Substance has been stored,
disposed of, placed, or used in the construction thereof; and which, in any
such case or in the aggregate, reasonably could be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Condition of Roosevelt Financial and the
Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. No claim, action, suit,
or proceeding is pending against Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt
Financial Subsidiary relating to Property of Roosevelt Financial or any
Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary before any court or other Regulatory
Authority or arbitration tribunal relating to hazardous substances,
pollution, or the environment, and there is no outstanding judgment, order,
writ, injunction, decree, or award against or materially adversely
affecting Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary with
respect to the same. Except for statutory or regulatory restrictions of
general application, no Regulatory Authority has placed any restriction on
the business of Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary
which reasonably could be expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Condition of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole.
(c) Except as previously disclosed to Sentinel Financial, since
December 31, 1994, neither Roosevelt Financial nor any Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiary has received any notification or communication as to any matter
which has not been resolved from any Regulatory Authority (i) asserting
that Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary is not in
substantial compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances
that such Regulatory Authority enforces, except with respect to matters
which reasonably could not be expected to have a material adverse effect on
the Condition of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (ii) threatening to revoke any license,
franchise, permit or governmental authorization that is material to the
Condition of Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, including without limitation Roosevelt Bank's status as
an insured depositary institution under the FDIA, or (iii) requiring or
threatening to require Roosevelt Financial or any of the Roosevelt
Financial Subsidiaries, or indicating that Roosevelt Financial or any of
the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries may be required, to enter into a cease
and desist order, agreement or memorandum of understanding or any other
agreement restricting or limiting or purporting to direct, restrict or
limit in any manner the operations of Roosevelt Financial or any of the
Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries, including without limitation any
restriction on the payment of dividends. No such cease and desist order,
agreement or memorandum of understanding or other agreement is currently in
effect.
3.9 Registration Statement, etc. None of the information regarding
---------------------------
Roosevelt Financial or any of the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries supplied or
to be supplied by Roosevelt Financial for inclusion or included in (i) the
Registration Statement, (ii) the Prospectus/Proxy Statement or (iii) any other
documents to be filed with any Regulatory Authority in connection with the
transactions contemplated hereby will, at the respective times such documents
are filed with any Regulatory Authority and, in the case of the Registration
Statement, when it becomes effective and, with respect to the Prospectus/Proxy
Statement, when mailed, be false or misleading with respect to any material
fact, or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the
statements therein not misleading or, in the case of the Prospectus/Proxy
Statement or any amendment thereof or supplement thereto, at the time of the
meeting of stockholders referred to in Section 5.3, be false or misleading with
respect to any material fact, or omit to state any material fact necessary to
correct any statement in any earlier communication with respect to the
solicitation of any proxy for such meeting. All documents which Roosevelt
Financial or any of the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries are responsible for
filing with any Regulatory Authority in connection with the Merger will comply
as to form in all material respects with the provisions of applicable law.
I-23
<PAGE>
3.10 Brokers and Finders. Neither Roosevelt Financial nor any of the
-------------------
Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries nor any of their respective officers, directors
or employees has employed any broker or finder or incurred any liability for any
financial advisory fees, brokerage fees, commissions or finder's fees, and no
broker or finder has acted directly or indirectly for Roosevelt Financial or any
of the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries, in connection with this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby.
3.11 Community Reinvestment Act Compliance. Roosevelt Bank is in material
-------------------------------------
compliance with the applicable provisions of the CRA and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, and Roosevelt Bank currently has a CRA rating of
satisfactory or better from the OTS. To the Best Knowledge of Roosevelt, there
is no fact or circumstance or set of facts or circumstances which would cause
Roosevelt Financial or any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary to fail to comply with
such provisions or cause the CRA rating of Roosevelt Bank to fall below
satisfactory.
ARTICLE IV
CONDUCT OF BUSINESSES PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME
4.1 Conduct of Businesses Prior to the Effective Time. During the period
-------------------------------------------------
from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, each of Roosevelt
Financial and Sentinel Financial shall, and shall cause each of their respective
Subsidiaries to, conduct its business only in the ordinary and usual course
consistent with past practices (including in the case of Roosevelt Financial and
its Subsidiaries the matters set forth in the fourth and fifth sentences of
Section 3.2 hereof) and shall, and shall cause each such Subsidiary to, use its
best efforts to maintain and preserve its business organization, employees and
advantageous business relationships and retain the services of its officers and
key employees.
4.2 Forbearances. Except as provided herein, during the period from the
------------
date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, Sentinel Financial shall not and
shall not permit any of the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries to, without the
prior written consent of Roosevelt Financial:
(a) declare, set aside or pay any dividends or other distributions,
directly or indirectly, in respect of its capital stock (other than
ordinary, normal dividends from a wholly owned Subsidiary of Sentinel
Financial to Sentinel Financial or another wholly owned Subsidiary of
Sentinel Financial);
(b) enter into or amend any employment, severance or similar
agreement or arrangement with any director or officer or employee, or
materially modify any of the Sentinel Financial Employee Plans or security
acquisition loans relating thereto (or prepay in whole or in part any such
loans) or grant any salary or wage increase or materially increase any
employee benefit (including incentive or bonus payments), except (i) normal
individual bonuses and increases in compensation to employees, in each case
and in the aggregate consistent with past practice or to the extent
required by law or contract, (ii) as set forth in Section 5.8 of this
Agreement and (iii) such increases of which Sentinel Financial notifies
Roosevelt Financial in writing and which Roosevelt Financial does not
disapprove in writing within ten days of the receipt of such notice;
(c) except to the extent that the fulfillment of the fiduciary duties
of Sentinel Financial's directors requires such action, as so advised in
writing by Sentinel Financial's outside counsel, authorize, recommend,
propose or announce an intention to authorize, so recommend or
I-24
<PAGE>
propose, or enter into an agreement in principle with respect to, any
merger, consolidation or business combination (other than the Merger), any
acquisition of a material amount of assets or securities, any disposition
of a material amount of assets or securities or any release or
relinquishment of any material contract rights;
(d) except as may be required by law or regulation, propose or adopt
any amendments to its certificate of incorporation or other charter
document or bylaws;
(e) issue, sell, grant, confer or award any of its Equity Securities
(except shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock issued pursuant to
options that were granted under the Sentinel Financial Option Plan and are
outstanding on the date of this Agreement) or effect any stock split or
adjust, combine, reclassify or otherwise change its capitalization as it
exists on the date of this Agreement;
(f) purchase, redeem, retire, repurchase, or exchange, or otherwise
acquire or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any of its Equity
Securities, whether pursuant to the terms of such Equity Securities or
otherwise;
(g) (i) without first consulting with Roosevelt Financial, enter into
or increase any loan or credit commitment (including stand-by letters of
credit) to, or invest or agree to invest in, any person or entity or modify
any of the material provisions or renew or otherwise extend the maturity
date of any existing loan or credit commitment (collectively, "Lend to") in
an amount in excess of $100,000, provided no such consultation shall be
required in respect of single-family residential loans or credits not
exceeding $350,000 that are made in compliance with Sentinel Federal's
lending policies as in effect on the date hereof; (ii) enter into, or
increase in an amount in excess of $350,000 any commercial or multi-family
real estate loan or credit commitment (including stand-by letters of
credit) to, or invest or agree to invest in, any commercial or multi-family
real estate project or entity, or Lend to any person other than in
accordance with lending policies as in effect on the date hereof, provided
that Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary may make any
such loan in the event (A) Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary has delivered to Roosevelt Financial or its designated
representative a notice of its intention to make such loan and such
information as Roosevelt Financial or its designated representative may
reasonably require in respect thereof and (B) Roosevelt Financial or its
designated representative shall not have objected to such loan by giving
written or facsimile notice of such objection within two business days
following the delivery to Roosevelt Financial of the notice of intention
and information as aforesaid; (iii) Lend to any person or entity, any of
the loans or other extensions of credit to which or investments in which
are on a "watch list" or similar internal report of Sentinel Financial or
any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary (except those denoted "pass" or similar
notation thereon), in an amount in excess of $100,000; or (iv) enter into
any agreement or engage in any transaction which reasonably could be
construed as materially affecting the asset/liability management or
interest rate risk management position of Sentinel Financial or Sentinel
Federal (in this regard, Sentinel Financial shall promptly telecopy to
Roosevelt Financial copies of all Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal
loan and deposit pricing reports as well as summaries of any proposed asset
sales and secondary market transactions as soon as they are identified);
provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall prohibit Sentinel
Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary from honoring any
contractual obligation in existence on the date of this Agreement or, with
respect to loans described in clause (i) above, making such loans after
consulting with Roosevelt Financial in accordance with the provisions of
that clause.
I-25
<PAGE>
(h) directly or indirectly (including, without limitation, through its
officers, directors, employees or other representatives) (i) initiate,
solicit or encourage any discussions, inquiries or proposals with any third
party relating to the disposition of any significant portion of the
business or assets of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary or the acquisition of 10% or more of any class of Equity
Securities of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary or
the merger of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary with
any person (other than Roosevelt Financial) or any similar transaction
(each such transaction being referred to in this Section 4.2(h) as an
"Acquisition Transaction") or (ii) except to the extent that the
fulfillment of the fiduciary duties of Sentinel Financial's directors
requires such action, as so advised in writing by Sentinel Financial's
outside counsel, directly or indirectly, (including through its officers,
directors, employees or other representatives), provide any such person
with information or assistance or negotiate with any such person with
respect to an Acquisition Transaction, and Sentinel Financial shall
immediately notify Roosevelt Financial orally and in reasonable detail of
all the relevant facts relating to all inquiries, indications of interest
and proposals which it may receive with respect to any Acquisition
Transaction and promptly confirm the same to Roosevelt Financial in
writing;
(i) take any action that would (A) materially impede or delay the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the
ability of Roosevelt Financial or Sentinel Financial to obtain any approval
of any Regulatory Authority required for the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement or to perform its covenants and agreements under this
Agreement or (B) prevent the Merger from qualifying as a pooling of
interests for accounting purposes, the Company Merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code or
the Bank Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a)(1)(A) or (D) of the Code;
(j) other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, incur any indebtedness for borrowed money, assume, guarantee,
endorse or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible or liable for
the obligations of any other individual, corporation or other entity; or
(k) agree in writing or otherwise to take any of the foregoing
actions or engage in any activity, enter into any transaction or take or
omit to take any other act which would make any of the representations and
warranties in Article II of this Agreement untrue or incorrect in any
material respect if made anew after engaging in such activity, entering
into such transaction, or taking or omitting such other act.
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
5.1 Access and Information. Roosevelt Financial and the Roosevelt
----------------------
Financial Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel
Financial Subsidiaries, on the other hand, shall each afford to each other, and
to the other's accountants, counsel and other representatives, reasonable access
during the period prior to the Effective Time, to all their respective
properties, books, contracts, commitments and records and, during such period,
each shall furnish promptly to the other (i) a copy of each report, schedule and
other document filed or received by it during such period pursuant to the
requirements of federal and state securities laws and (ii) all other information
concerning its business,
I-26
<PAGE>
properties and personnel as such other party may reasonably request. Except as
may be required by law, each party hereto shall, and shall cause its advisors
and representatives to, (A) hold confidential all information obtained in
connection with any transaction contemplated hereby with respect to the other
party which is not otherwise public knowledge, (B) return all documents
(including copies thereof) obtained hereunder from the other party to such other
party and (C) use its best efforts to cause all information obtained pursuant to
this Agreement or in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement to be
treated as confidential and not use, or knowingly permit others to use, any such
information unless such information becomes generally available to the public.
5.2 Registration Statement; Regulatory Matters.
------------------------------------------
(a) Roosevelt Financial, in cooperation with Sentinel Financial,
shall prepare and, subject to the review and consent of Sentinel Financial
with respect to matters relating to Sentinel Financial (which consent shall
not be unreasonably withheld), file with the SEC as soon as reasonably
practicable, but in no event later than 90 days from the date of this
Agreement, the Registration Statement (or the equivalent in the form of
preliminary proxy material), with respect to the shares of Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock to be issued in the Merger. Roosevelt Financial
shall use its best efforts to cause the Registration Statement to become
effective. Roosevelt Financial shall also take any reasonable action
required to be taken under any applicable state blue sky or securities laws
in connection with the issuance of such shares, and Sentinel Financial and
the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries shall furnish Roosevelt Financial all
information concerning Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries and the stockholders thereof as Roosevelt Financial may
reasonably request in connection with any such action. Sentinel Financial
authorizes Roosevelt Financial to utilize in the Registration Statement the
information concerning Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel Financial
Subsidiaries provided to Roosevelt Financial for inclusion in the
Prospectus/Proxy Statement. Roosevelt Financial shall advise Sentinel
Financial promptly when the Registration Statement has become effective and
of any supplements or amendments thereto, and shall furnish Sentinel
Financial with copies of all such documents.
(b) Sentinel Financial and Roosevelt Financial shall cooperate and
use their respective best efforts to promptly prepare all documentation, to
effect all filings and to obtain all permits, consents, approvals and
authorizations of all third parties and Regulatory Authorities necessary to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and, as and if
directed by Roosevelt Financial, to consummate such other mergers,
consolidations or asset transfers or other transactions by and among the
Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries
concurrently with or following the Effective Time, provided that such
actions do not materially impede or delay the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
5.3 Stockholder Approval. Sentinel Financial shall call a meeting of its
--------------------
stockholders to be held as soon as practicable on a mutually agreeable date for
the purpose of voting upon the Merger. In connection with such meeting,
Roosevelt Financial and Sentinel Financial shall cooperate in the preparation of
the Prospectus/Proxy Statement and, with the approval of each of Roosevelt
Financial and Sentinel Financial, which approvals will not be unreasonably
withheld, the Prospectus/Proxy Statement shall be mailed to the stockholders of
Sentinel Financial. The Board of Directors of Sentinel Financial shall submit
for approval of Sentinel Financial's stockholders the matters to be voted upon
at such meeting. The Board of Directors of Sentinel Financial hereby does and
(except to the extent that the fulfillment of the fiduciary duties of Sentinel
Financial's directors so requires, as so advised in writing by Sentinel
Financial's outside counsel) will (i) recommend this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby to the stockholders of Sentinel Financial and
(ii) use its best efforts to obtain any
I-27
<PAGE>
vote of Sentinel Financial's stockholders necessary for the approval and
adoption of this Agreement and the Merger.
5.4 Current Information. During the period from the date of this
-------------------
Agreement to the Effective Time, each party shall promptly furnish the other
with copies of all monthly and other interim financial statements as the same
become available and shall cause one or more of its designated representatives
to confer on a regular and frequent basis with representatives of the other
party. Each party shall promptly notify the other party of any material change
in its business or operations, of any fact, omission or condition which makes
untrue or misleading or shows to have been untrue or misleading the information
supplied by it for inclusion in the Registration Statement or the
Prospectus/Proxy Statement, and of any governmental complaints, investigations
or hearings (or communications indicating that the same may be contemplated), or
the institution or the threat of material litigation involving such party, and
shall keep the other party fully informed of such events.
5.5 Agreements of Affiliates. As soon as practicable after the date of
------------------------
this Agreement, Sentinel Financial shall deliver to Roosevelt Financial a
letter, reviewed by its counsel, identifying all persons whom Sentinel Financial
believes to be "affiliates" of Sentinel Financial for purposes of Rule 145 under
the Securities Act or for purposes of qualifying for pooling of interests
accounting treatment for the Merger. Sentinel Financial shall use its best
efforts to cause each person who is so identified as an "affiliate" to deliver
to Roosevelt Financial, as soon as practicable thereafter, a written agreement,
in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Roosevelt Financial, providing
that from the date of such agreement each such person will agree not to sell,
pledge, transfer or otherwise dispose of any shares of stock of Sentinel
Financial held by such person or any shares of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock
to be received by such person in the Merger (i) during the period commencing 30
days prior to the Merger and ending at the time of publication of financial
results covering at least 30 days of combined operations after the Merger and
(ii) at any time, except in compliance with the applicable provisions of the
Securities Act and other applicable laws and regulations. Prior to the Effective
Time, Sentinel Financial shall amend and supplement such letter and use its best
efforts to cause each additional person who is identified as an "affiliate" to
execute a written agreement as set forth in this Section 5.5.
5.6 Expenses. Each party hereto shall bear its own expenses incident to
--------
preparing, entering into and carrying out this Agreement and to consummating the
Merger, provided, however, that Roosevelt Financial shall pay all printing and
mailing expenses and filing fees associated with the Registration Statement and
the Prospectus/Proxy Statement and all filings with Regulatory Authorities for
approval of this Agreement.
5.7 Miscellaneous Agreements and Consents. Subject to the terms and
-------------------------------------
conditions herein provided, and except to the extent required for the
fulfillment of the fiduciary duties of Sentinel Financial's directors as so
advised in writing by Sentinel Financial's outside counsel, each of the parties
hereto agrees to use its respective best efforts to take, or cause to be taken,
all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or
advisable under applicable laws and regulations to consummate and make effective
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement as expeditiously as possible,
including without limitation using its respective best efforts to lift or
rescind any injunction or restraining order adversely affecting the ability of
the parties to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. Subject to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, each party shall, and shall cause each
of its respective Subsidiaries to, use its best efforts to obtain consents of
all third parties and Regulatory Authorities necessary or, in the reasonable
opinion of Roosevelt Financial, desirable for the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
I-28
<PAGE>
5.8 Employee Agreements and Benefits.
--------------------------------
(a) Following the Effective Time, Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt
Bank shall honor in accordance with its terms the employment agreement to
be entered into between Roosevelt Bank and Craig D. Laemmli in the form set
forth in Schedule 5.8, which agreement shall be executed at the Closing. As
of the Effective Time, all employment contracts or similar agreements
theretofore existing between Sentinel Financial or any of its Subsidiaries
and Craig D. Laemmli shall terminate without any payment or penalty
obligation and be superseded and replaced in its entirety by the employment
agreement referred to in the immediately preceding sentence of this Section
5.8(a). In the event that the substantive terms of the employment agreement
between Craig D. Laemmli and Roosevelt Bank in the form set forth in
Schedule 5.8 are modified in any manner that would materially diminish the
anticipated benefits of such employment agreement to Mr. Laemmli, he and
Roosevelt Bank shall be under no obligation to execute said agreement and
Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank agree that, at and following the
Effective Time, Craig D. Laemmli's existing employment agreement dated
January 7, 1994 shall remain in effect. Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt
Bank further agree that, notwithstanding any other provision herein, in the
event Mr. Laemmli's existing employment agreement remains in effect
pursuant to the preceding sentence, the Company Merger shall constitute a
change in control within the meaning of Section 5(a) of said agreement.
Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank agree, and Mr. Laemmli has
heretofore acknowledged and agreed with Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt
Bank, that upon the Company Merger, in the event that Mr. Laemmli's
existing employment agreement remains in effect pursuant to the second
preceding sentence, Mr. Laemmli shall be entitled to receive in full
satisfaction of the obligations of Roosevelt Financial, Roosevelt Bank,
Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal under such existing employment
agreement, in cash, 299 percent of Mr. Laemmli's "base amount" of
compensation, as defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code; provided,
however, that Mr. Laemmli has heretofore acknowledged and agreed that in no
event shall Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt Bank be obligated to make any
payment or provide any benefits under his existing employment agreement or
otherwise that would be nondeductible by Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt
Bank for federal tax purposes pursuant to Section 280G of the Code. Neither
Sentinel Financial nor Sentinel Federal shall make, and neither Roosevelt
Financial nor Roosevelt Federal shall be in any manner obligated to make,
any payment whatsoever to any other Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal
director or employee under any circumstance in which such payment is not or
will not be deductible under Section 162(m) or Section 280G of the Code.
For at least one year after the Effective Time, and for so long thereafter
as the participating directors and Roosevelt Bank deem the relationship to
be mutually beneficial and subject to compliance with the Thrift
Regulations, the directors of Sentinel Financial who wish to do so may
serve as regional Advisory Directors of Roosevelt Bank with a retainer fee
for each such Advisory Director of $500 per month.
(b) Except to the extent provided in Sections 1.3(f) and 5.8(d)
hereof: (i) the provisions of each plan, program or arrangement providing
for the issuance or grant of any interest in respect of the capital stock
of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary shall be
terminated as of the Effective Time and (ii) Sentinel Financial shall
ensure that following the Effective Time no participant in any Sentinel
Financial Employee Plan shall have any right thereunder to acquire any
securities of Sentinel Financial, any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary,
Roosevelt Financial, any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary, or any successor
in interest to any of such entities.
Shares of Sentinel Financial Common Stock issued pursuant to the
Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City Management
Recognition and Development
I-29
<PAGE>
Plan and Trust Agreement for Officers and Key Employees and the Sentinel
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City Management Recognition
and Development Plan and Trust Agreement for Outside Directors (together,
the "MRP Plans") that are subject to forfeiture restrictions shall no
longer be subject to such restrictions upon the Effective Time and the
certificates for Roosevelt Financial Common Stock issued in the exchange
shall not contain any legend relating to the MRP Plans.
(c) Roosevelt Bank anticipates retaining the employees of Sentinel
Federal as employees of Roosevelt Bank after the Effective Time, subject to
the needs of Roosevelt Bank and the qualifications of such employees. Those
employees (other than Craig D. Laemmli) who are not retained for at least
six months after the Effective Time will be offered a severance arrangement
of (i) four weeks' pay plus (ii) an additional week's pay for each year of
service to Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel Financial Subsidiary (and
shall be entitled to receive in cash the value of their unused accrued
vacation leave to the extent it has been expensed and accrued in the
regular course of business for financial reporting purposes during the
periods it was earned). Employees of Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary who continue in employment with Roosevelt Financial or
any Roosevelt Financial Subsidiary following the Effective Time shall be
credited for prior years of service with Sentinel Financial or any Sentinel
Financial Subsidiary for purposes of eligibility and vesting (but not for
the accrual of benefits) under Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Financial
Subsidiary benefit plans and policies (including, without limitation,
vacation and sick leave policies), there shall be no exclusion from medical
coverage as the result of pre-existing conditions that were covered under
the medical plan of Sentinel Financial or the applicable Sentinel Financial
Subsidiary, and such employees shall be entitled to participate on an
equitable basis in the same benefit plans and policies as are generally
available to Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank employees of similar
rank and status not later than January 1, 1998.
In the event that the combined benefits allocable under the Sentinel
Qualified Plans (as hereinafter defined) and any qualified retirement plans
of Roosevelt Financial or the Roosevelt Financial Subsidiaries, as
applicable (the "Roosevelt Qualified Plans"), by virtue of the allocation
under Section 5.8(d)(ii) hereof or otherwise, exceed the applicable
limitations of Section 415 of the Code, any required reductions in
allocations necessary to meet such limitations will be made first to the
benefits allocable under the Roosevelt Qualified Plans.
(d) Prior to the Effective Time, and except to the extent necessary to
effectuate the intent of subparagraphs (i) and (ii) below, Sentinel
Financial shall make no amendments to the Sentinel Federal Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (the "Sentinel Federal ESOP") or any other tax-qualified
retirement plan maintained by Sentinel Financial or any of its Subsidiaries
(together with the Sentinel Federal ESOP, the "Sentinel Qualified Plans")
without the prior written approval of Roosevelt Financial and shall make no
additional contributions to the Sentinel Federal ESOP except for
contributions that are (x) made on or before the earlier of June 30, 1996
or the Effective Time, at levels and with a frequency that is not in excess
of prior practice, and (y) applied to the repayment of ESOP indebtedness
("Debt"); provided, however, that the Sentinel Federal ESOP may be amended
--------- --------
to provide for full vesting of participant accounts at the Effective Time.
(i) As soon as practicable after the Effective Time (but not
prior to the publication of financial results covering at least 30
days of combined operations after the Merger) and without adversely
affecting the qualified status of the Sentinel Federal ESOP, the
trustees of the Sentinel Federal ESOP shall convert to cash a portion
of the
I-30
<PAGE>
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock received by the Sentinel Federal ESOP
in the Company Merger with respect to unallocated Sentinel Financial
Common Stock in order to repay the entire outstanding balance of the
Sentinel Federal ESOP loan.
(ii) As soon as practicable after the retirement of the Sentinel
Federal ESOP loan as provided in subparagraph (i) above (but not later
than 120 days after the publication of financial results covering at
least 30 days of combined operations after the Merger) and without
adversely affecting the qualified status of the Sentinel Federal ESOP,
the trustees of the Sentinel Federal ESOP shall allocate the remaining
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock received by the Sentinel Federal ESOP
in the Company Merger with respect to unallocated shares of Sentinel
Financial Common Stock to the accounts of all participants in the
Sentinel Federal ESOP (whether or not such participants are then
actively employed) and beneficiaries in proportion to the account
balances of such participants and beneficiaries as they existed as of
the Effective Time (and, if required, to the accounts of former
participants or their beneficiaries) as investment earnings of the
Sentinel Federal ESOP (except to the extent that any such allocations
would be subject to the limitations of Section 415 of the Code for
such year). Sentinel Financial, at its expense, may make an
Application for Determination to the appropriate District Office of
the Internal Revenue Service for a determination letter or ruling,
relating to whether unallocated employer securities (or proceeds)
remaining after full payment of the Sentinel Federal ESOP loan can be
allocated as ESOP earnings to participants or former participants of
the Sentinel Federal ESOP as of the Effective Time without any amount
thereof being subject to limitation on allocation under Section 415 of
the Code. In the event that a favorable determination or ruling is
received by Sentinel Financial on or prior to 90 days following the
Effective Time relating to the matters set forth in the preceding
sentence, then the Sentinel Federal ESOP shall make allocation of
unallocated employer securities in a manner consistent with the
favorable determination letter or ruling. If a favorable determination
letter or ruling is not received within the time period specified in
the preceding sentence, then in that event, after full payment of the
Sentinel Federal ESOP loan, unallocated employer securities shall be
allocated as of the Effective Time subject to the limitation on
allocation under Section 415 of the Code. No allocation of employer
securities (or proceeds) shall be made under the Sentinel Federal ESOP
relating to periods after the Effective Time and no employer
contribution shall be made to the Sentinel Federal ESOP relating to
periods after the Effective Time.
(iii) As of the Effective Time, the administrative and other
authority previously exercised with respect to the Sentinel Federal
ESOP by the Board of Directors of Sentinel Financial shall be
exercised solely by a Committee appointed and selected by the Board of
Directors of Sentinel Financial and in place under the terms of the
Sentinel Federal ESOP ("Committee"), which authority shall include the
authority to appoint and remove trustees of the Sentinel Federal ESOP.
(iv) Subject to Roosevelt Financial waiting 120 days after the
publication of financial results covering at least 30 days of combined
operations after the Merger with respect to the Sentinel Federal ESOP
only to permit allocations to be made pursuant to subparagraph (ii),
Roosevelt Financial may terminate the Sentinel Qualified Plans,
continue the Sentinel Qualified Plans, or merge the Sentinel Qualified
Plans with other tax-qualified retirement plans maintained by
Roosevelt Financial or its Subsidiaries, all in its sole discretion,
but in a manner consistent with the requirements of ERISA and the
applicable provisions of the Code. The vested
I-31
<PAGE>
accrued benefits of participants in the Sentinel Qualified Plans shall
not be reduced by virtue of any such termination, continuation or
merger of the Sentinel Qualified Plans. Any such termination or merger
may be effective as of the Effective Time.
(v) Neither Roosevelt Financial nor any of its Subsidiaries
shall have any obligation to make any contributions to the Sentinel
Qualified Plans.
5.9 Press Releases. The initial press release announcing this Agreement
--------------
shall be as previously agreed upon by Roosevelt Financial and Sentinel
Financial. Except as deemed by Sentinel Financial, after consultation with its
outside counsel, to be necessary to comply with applicable law, Sentinel
Financial and its Subsidiaries shall not issue any press releases or written
statements for general public circulation relating to this Agreement or any of
the transactions contemplated hereby without the prior consent of Roosevelt
Financial, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
5.10 D&O Indemnification and Insurance. Roosevelt Financial (and any
---------------------------------
successor) shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the present and former
directors, officers and employees of Sentinel Financial and the Sentinel
Financial Subsidiaries against all liabilities, claims, losses, damages or
judgments, or amounts paid in settlement with the approval of Roosevelt
Financial (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) of any claim,
action, or suit, arising out of actions or omissions occurring at or prior to
the Effective Time (including, without limitation, the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement) regardless of whether such matter is asserted or claimed
prior to, at or after the Effective Time, to the fullest extent such persons are
indemnified under the DGCL and Sentinel Financial's Certificate of Incorporation
and Bylaws as in effect on the date hereof, including provisions relating to the
advancement of expenses incurred in the defense of any litigation. Roosevelt
Financial shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the persons serving as
officers and directors of Sentinel Federal immediately prior to the Effective
Time to be covered for a period of three years from the Effective Time by single
(one-time) premium tail coverage under the directors' and officers' liability
insurance policy maintained by Sentinel Federal (provided that Roosevelt
Financial may substitute therefor policies of at least the same coverage and
amounts containing terms and conditions which are not materially less
advantageous than such policy) with respect to acts or omissions occurring prior
to the Effective Time which were committed by such officers and directors in
their capacity as such; provided, however, that in no event shall Roosevelt
Financial be required to expend in the aggregate more than 150% of the annual
amount currently expended by Sentinel Federal (the "Insurance Amount") to
maintain or procure insurance coverage pursuant hereto and further provided that
if Roosevelt Financial is unable to maintain or obtain the insurance called for
by this Section 5.10, Roosevelt Financial shall use its reasonable best efforts
to obtain as much comparable insurance as is available for the Insurance Amount.
5.11 Third Parties. Sentinel Financial and each Sentinel Financial
-------------
Subsidiary, as applicable, shall immediately terminate all negotiations or
discussions concerning any Acquisition Transaction with parties other than
Roosevelt Financial and enforce the terms of all confidentiality agreements with
such other parties; provided, however, that nothing in this Section 5.11 is
intended to preclude, after such termination, the ability of Sentinel Financial
and the Sentinel Financial Subsidiaries to engage in the actions set forth in
Section 4.2(h)(ii), but only under the circumstances and to the extent permitted
thereby.
5.12 Schedule 13D or 13G Filings. Sentinel Financial shall immediately
---------------------------
advise Roosevelt Financial of the receipt (and, to the Best Knowledge of
Sentinel, the filing) after the date hereof of all Schedules 13D or 13G (and all
Schedule 13D or 13G amendments) under the Exchange Act with respect to Sentinel
Financial Common Stock, and shall provide Roosevelt Financial with a copy of
each such Schedule 13D or 13G or Schedule 13D or 13G amendment promptly after
receipt thereof.
I-32
<PAGE>
5.13 Dissenting Shareholders' Appraisal Rights. Roosevelt Financial and
-----------------------------------------
Sentinel Financial, as applicable, will comply with all applicable notification
and other provisions of regulations or statutes relating to Dissenting Shares.
5.14 Reservation of Shares. Roosevelt Financial shall take all corporate
---------------------
action necessary to reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock for delivery upon exercise of Sentinel
Financial stock options assumed by it in accordance with Section 1.3(f) hereof.
As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, Roosevelt Financial shall file
an appropriate registration statement with respect to the shares of Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock subject to such options and shall use its best efforts to
maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement or registration
statements (and maintain the current status of the prospectus or prospectuses
contained therein) for so long as such options remain outstanding.
5.15 Nasdaq Listing. Roosevelt Financial shall use all reasonable efforts
--------------
to cause the securities to be issued in the Merger, and to be reserved for
issuance upon exercise of Sentinel Financial stock options, to be approved for
listing on the Nasdaq Stock Market (or such other national securities exchange
or stock market on which such securities shall then be traded), subject to
official notice of issuance, prior to or as of the Closing.
5.16 Assistance with Third-Party Agreements. Sentinel Financial and
---------------------------------------
Sentinel Federal shall cooperate with, and use all reasonable efforts to assist,
Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank in (i) gaining access to all of Sentinel
Financial's and Sentinel Federal's third-party vendors, and the landlords of all
of Sentinel Financial's and Sentinel Federal's leased properties, promptly after
the date of this Agreement, and (b) obtaining the cooperation of such third-
parties in a smooth transition in accordance with Roosevelt Financial's and
Roosevelt Federal's timetable at or after the Effective Time. Sentinel
Financial and Sentinel Federal shall also, at Roosevelt Financial's or Roosevelt
Bank's request, give notice of termination of third-party contracts to be
effective at or after the Effective Time, and take such additional action as may
be necessary or reasonably appropriate to ensure that such contracts are
terminated at the date requested.
5.17 Notices and Communications. Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal
--------------------------
shall, if requested to do so by Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt Bank following
receipt of all approvals of governmental authorities to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, but prior to the expiration of any statutory
waiting periods, cooperate with Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank by
sending necessary or appropriate customer notifications and communications to
advise such customers of the impending transaction and of Roosevelt Financial's
and Roosevelt Bank's plans for following the Effective Time.
5.18 Insurance Policies Assignment. Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
-----------------------------
Federal agree to make commercially reasonable efforts to obtain consent to
assignment of any insurance policies of Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal
if requested to do so by Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt Bank. Sentinel
Financial and Sentinel Federal shall also inform Roosevelt Financial and
Roosevelt Bank no later than the Effective Time of any material unfiled
insurance claims of which they have knowledge and for which they believe
coverage exists.
I-33
<PAGE>
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS
6.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the Merger. The
----------------------------------------------------------
respective obligations of each party to effect the Merger shall be subject to
the fulfillment or waiver at or prior to the Effective Time of the following
conditions:
(a) This Agreement and the Merger shall have received the requisite
approval of the stockholders of Sentinel Financial at the meeting of
stockholders called pursuant to Section 5.3 of this Agreement;
(b) All requisite approvals of this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby shall have been received from the OTS and all other
Regulatory Authorities, if any, having approval authority with respect to
the Merger, without the imposition of any condition which differs from
conditions customarily imposed by such Regulatory Authorities in orders
approving acquisitions of the type contemplated hereby and compliance with
which would materially diminish the reasonably anticipated benefits of the
Merger to Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt Bank, and all applicable waiting
periods shall have expired.
(c) The Registration Statement shall have been declared effective and
shall not be subject to a stop order or any threatened stop order.
(d) Neither Roosevelt Financial, Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel Financial
nor Sentinel Federal shall be subject to any order, decree or injunction of
a court or agency of competent jurisdiction which enjoins or prohibits the
consummation of the Merger.
(e) A tax opinion addressed to both Roosevelt Financial and Sentinel
Financial by counsel or independent certified accountants mutually
acceptable to Roosevelt Financial and Sentinel Financial shall have been
obtained with respect to the Merger, based on customary reliance and
subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that for federal income
tax purposes:
(i) The Company Merger and the Bank Merger will each qualify as a
"reorganization" under Section 368(a) of the Code.
(ii) No gain or loss will be recognized by Roosevelt Financial,
Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal by reason of
the Company Merger or the Bank Merger.
(iii) No gain or loss will be recognized by any Sentinel Financial
shareholder (except in connection with the receipt of cash in lieu of
a fractional share of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock) upon the
exchange of Sentinel Financial Common Stock solely for Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock in the Merger .
(iv) The basis of the Roosevelt Financial Common Stock received
by a Sentinel Financial shareholder who exchanges Sentinel Financial
Common Stock for Roosevelt Financial Common Stock will be the same as
the basis of the Sentinel Financial Common Stock surrendered in
exchange therefor (subject to any adjustments required as
I-34
<PAGE>
the result of receipt of cash in lieu of a fractional share of
Roosevelt Financial Common Stock).
(v) The holding period of the Roosevelt Financial Common Stock
received by a Sentinel Financial shareholder receiving Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock will include the period during which the
Sentinel Financial Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefore was
held (provided that such Common Stock of such Sentinel Financial
shareholder was held as a capital asset at the Effective Time).
(vi) Cash received by a Sentinel Financial shareholder in lieu
of a fractional share interest of Roosevelt Financial Common Stock
will be treated as having been received as a distribution in full
payment in exchange for the fractional share interest of Roosevelt
Financial Common Stock which he would otherwise be entitled to receive
and will qualify as capital gain or loss (assuming the Sentinel
Financial stock was a capital asset in his hands at the Effective
Time).
(f) Listing of Shares. The securities to be issued in the Merger shall
-----------------
be approved for listing as contemplated by Section 5.15 hereof, subject to
official notice of issuance.
6.2 Conditions to Obligations of Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
------------------------------------------------------------
Federal to Effect the Merger. The obligations of Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
- ----------------------------
Federal to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment or waiver at or
prior to the Effective Time of the following additional conditions:
(a) Representations and Warranties. The representations and
------------------------------
warranties of Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank set forth in
Article III of this Agreement shall be true and correct in all
material respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of the
Effective Time (as though made on and as of the Effective Time except
(i) to the extent such representations and warranties are by their
express provisions made as of a specified date, (ii) for the effect of
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (iii) where the
failure to be true and correct would not have a material adverse
effect on the Condition of Roosevelt Financial and its Subsidiaries
taken as a whole) and Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal shall
have received a certificate of the president and chief executive
officer of Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank to that effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations. Roosevelt Financial and
--------------------------
Roosevelt Bank shall have performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by them under this Agreement
prior to the Effective Time, and Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
Federal shall have received a certificate of the president and chief
executive officer of Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank to that
effect.
(c) Opinion of Counsel. Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
------------------
Federal shall have received an opinion from Silver, Freedman & Taff,
L.L.P., counsel to Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank, dated the
Closing Date, in form and substance substantially as heretofore
provided to Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal.
(d) Delivery of Merger Consideration. Roosevelt Financial shall
--------------------------------
have provided to the Exchange Agent (i) certificates representing at
least the aggregate number of shares of Roosevelt Financial Common
Stock to be issued to the shareholders of Sentinel Financial pursuant
to the provisions of Section 1.3(a) hereof and (ii) sufficient cash to
pay to Sentinel Financial shareholders their fractional share interest
as provided in Section 1.3(e) hereof.
I-35
<PAGE>
6.3 Conditions to Obligations of Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank
-------------------------------------------------------------------
to Effect the Merger. The obligations of Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt
- ---------------------
Bank to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment or waiver at or
prior to the Effective Time of the following additional conditions:
(a) Representations and Warranties. The representations and
------------------------------
warranties of Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal set forth in Article
II of this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of this
Agreement and as of the Effective Time (as though made on and as of the
Effective Time except (i) to the extent such representations and warranties
are by their express provisions made as of a specific date, (ii) for the
effect of transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (iii) where the
failure to be true and correct would not have a material adverse effect on
the Condition of Sentinel Financial and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole)
and Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank shall have received a
certificate of the president and chief executive officer of Sentinel
Financial and Sentinel Federal to that effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations. Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
--------------------------
Federal shall have performed in all material respects all obligations
required to be performed by them under this Agreement prior to the
Effective Time, and Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank shall have
received a certificate of the president and chief executive officer of
Sentinel Financial and Sentinel Federal to that effect.
(c) Opinion of Counsel. Roosevelt Financial and Roosevelt Bank shall
------------------
have received an opinion from Breyer & Aguggia, special counsel to Sentinel
Financial and Sentinel Federal, dated the Closing Date, in form and
substance substantially as heretofore provided to Roosevelt Financial and
Roosevelt Bank.
(d) Voting Agreements. Simultaneous with the execution and delivery
-----------------
of this Agreement (and in the case of any person who becomes a director of
Sentinel Financial after the execution and delivery of this Agreement,
promptly upon becoming such a director), each of the directors of Sentinel
Financial shall have executed and delivered to Roosevelt Financial a Voting
Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
(e) Third Party Consents. All consents or approvals of all persons
--------------------
(other than Regulatory Authorities) required for or in connection with the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement or the consummation
of the Merger shall have been obtained and shall be in full force and
effect, except only such consents and approvals the failure to obtain which
would not, individually and in the aggregate, have a material adverse
effect on the Condition of Roosevelt Financial as the surviving
corporation.
(f) Pooling of Interests. Roosevelt Financial shall have received from
--------------------
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP a letter, in the form then customarily issued by such
accountants in transactions of this type, to the effect that the Merger
will qualify for pooling of interests accounting treatment.
(g) Agreements of Affiliates. Roosevelt Financial shall have received
------------------------
the written affiliates' agreements described in Section 5.5 hereof.
(h) Supervisory Agreement The Supervisory Agreement, dated December
---------------------
20, 1989, between Sentinel Federal and the OTS shall have been terminated
prior to the Effective Time.
I-36
<PAGE>
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior
-----------
to the Effective Time, whether before or after any requisite stockholder
approval:
(a) by mutual consent of the Board of Directors of Roosevelt
Financial and the Board of Directors of Sentinel Financial;
(b) by the Board of Directors of Roosevelt Financial or the Board of
Directors of Sentinel Financial at any time after January 31, 1997 if the
Company Merger shall not theretofore have been consummated (provided that
the terminating party is not then in material breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or other agreement contained herein);
(c) by the Board of Directors of Roosevelt Financial or the Board of
Directors of Sentinel Financial if (i) any Regulatory Authority denies
approval of the Merger, or (ii) the stockholders of Sentinel Financial do
not approve this Agreement and the Merger at the meeting referred to in
Section 5.3 (provided that the terminating party is not then in material
breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement
contained herein);
(d) by the Board of Directors of Roosevelt Financial in the event of a
material breach by Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal of any
representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in this
Agreement, which breach is not cured within 30 days after written notice
thereof to Sentinel Financial by Roosevelt Financial;
(e) by the Board of Directors of Sentinel Financial in the event of a
material breach by Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt Bank of any
representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in this
Agreement, which breach is not cured within 30 days after written notice
thereof is given to Roosevelt Financial by Sentinel Financial.
(f) by the Board of Directors of Sentinel Financial if in the exercise
of good faith judgment as to fiduciary duties to stockholders imposed by
law, as advised in writing by special counsel, the Board of Directors of
Sentinel Financial determines that such termination is required by the
occurrence of any of the events set forth in subparagraphs (i), (ii) or
(iii) of Section 7.2(a), provided that Sentinel Financial's ability to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to this paragraph is conditioned upon the
prior payment by Sentinel Financial of the Third-Party Fee (as defined in
Section 7.2(a).
7.2 Effect of Termination. In the event of termination of this Agreement
---------------------
as provided in Section 7.1 hereof, this Agreement shall forthwith become void
and there shall be no liability under this Agreement on the part of Roosevelt
Financial or Sentinel Financial or their respective officers or directors except
as set forth in the second sentence of Section 5.1, in Section 5.6, in the last
sentence of Section 8.1 or in this Section 7.2.
(a) Third-Party Fee In recognition of the expenses of, and other
---------------
opportunities forgone by, Roosevelt Financial in connection with this
Agreement and the Merger, the parties agree that Sentinel Financial shall
pay to Roosevelt Financial a fee of $680,000 in cash (the
I-37
<PAGE>
"Third-Party Fee") on demand if, within 18 months after the date hereof,
the Merger has not been completed and there occurs any of the events set
forth in subparagraphs (i), (ii) or (iii) below.
(i) Any person other than Roosevelt Financial or an affiliate of
Roosevelt Financial acquires beneficial ownership of 25% or more of
the then-outstanding Sentinel Financial Common Stock;
(ii) Sentinel Financial or any of its affiliates, without having
received Roosevelt Financial's prior written consent, enters into an
agreement to engage in an Acquisition Transaction (as defined below)
with any person (the term "person" for purposes of this Agreement
having the meaning assigned thereto in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3)
of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder) other
than Roosevelt Financial or any of its Subsidiaries, or Sentinel
Financial's Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders of
Sentinel Financial approve or accept any Acquisition Transaction with
any person other than Roosevelt Financial or any of its Subsidiaries.
For purposes of this Section, "Acquisition Transaction" shall mean (i)
a merger or consolidation, or any similar transaction, involving
Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal, (ii) a purchase, lease or
other acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets of
Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal, or (iii) a purchase or other
acquisition (including by way of merger, consolidation, share exchange
or otherwise) of securities representing 10% or more of the voting
power of Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal; provided, that the
term "Acquisition Transaction" does not include any internal merger or
consolidation involving only Sentinel Financial and/or its
Subsidiaries; or
(iii) A bona fide proposal is made by a third party to Sentinel
Financial or any of its Subsidiaries or shareholders to engage in an
Acquisition Transaction and after such proposal is made any of the
following events occurs: Sentinel Financial willfully breaches this
Agreement and such breach entitles Roosevelt Financial to terminate
this Agreement; the holders of Sentinel Financial Common Stock do not
approve this Agreement at the meeting referred to in Section 5.3; such
meeting is not held or is canceled prior to termination of this
Agreement for reasons other than the fault of Roosevelt Financial; or
Sentinel Financial's Board of Directors withdraws or modifies in a
manner adverse to Roosevelt Financial the recommendation of Sentinel
Financial's Board of Directors with respect to this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Sentinel Financial shall not be
obligated to pay to Roosevelt Financial the Third-Party Fee if, prior to
the occurrence any of the events set forth in subparagraphs (i), (ii) or
(iii) above, Sentinel Financial validly terminates this Agreement pursuant
to Sections 7.1(a), (c)(i) or (e).
7.3 Amendment. This Agreement and the Schedules hereto may be
---------
amended by the parties hereto, by action taken by or on behalf of their
respective Boards of Directors, at any time before or after approval of this
Agreement by the stockholders of Sentinel Financial; provided, however, that
after any such approval by the stockholders of Sentinel Financial no such
modification shall (i) alter or change the amount or kind of consideration to be
received by holders of Sentinel Financial Common Stock as provided in this
Agreement or (ii) adversely affect the tax treatment to Sentinel Financial
stockholders of the stock portion of the Merger Consideration. This Agreement
may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each
of Roosevelt Financial and Sentinel Financial.
I-38
<PAGE>
7.4 Severability. Any term, provision, covenant or restriction contained
------------
in this Agreement held by a court or a Regulatory Authority of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, shall be ineffective to the
extent of such invalidity, voidness or unenforceability, but neither the
remaining terms, provisions, covenants or restrictions contained in this
Agreement nor the validity or enforceability thereof in any other jurisdictions
shall be affected or impaired thereby. Any term, provision, covenant or
restriction contained in this Agreement that is so found to be so broad as to be
unenforceable shall be interpreted to be as broad as is enforceable.
7.5 Waiver. Any term, condition or provision of this Agreement may be
------
waived in writing at any time by the Board of Directors of the party which is,
or whose stockholders are, entitled to the benefits thereof.
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
8.1 Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements. No
----------------------------------------------------------
investigation by the parties hereto made heretofore or hereafter shall affect
the representations and warranties of the parties which are contained herein and
each such representation and warranty shall survive such investigation. Except
as set forth below in this Section 8.1, all representations, warranties and
agreements in this Agreement of the parties or in any instrument delivered by a
party pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement shall not survive at the
Effective Time or the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its
terms. In the event of consummation of the Merger, the agreements contained in
or referred to in Sections 5.2, 5.8 and 5.10 shall survive the Effective Time.
In the event of termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, the
agreements contained in or referred to in the second sentence of Section 5.1,
in Sections 5.6 and 7.2 and in the last sentence of this Section 8.1 shall
survive such termination. Nothing herein shall relieve a breaching party from
liability to a non-breaching party in the event of a proper termination of this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(d) or Section 7.1(e).
8.2 Notices. All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in
-------
writing and shall be deemed to be duly received (i) on the date given if
delivered personally or (ii) upon confirmation of receipt if by facsimile
transmission or (iii) on the date received if mailed by registered or certified
mail (return receipt requested), in each case to the parties at the following
addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like
notice):
(i) if to Roosevelt Financial or Roosevelt Bank, or both:
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.
900 Roosevelt Parkway
Chesterfield, Missouri 63017
Attention: Stanley J. Bradshaw
President and Chief
Executive Officer
Telecopy: (314) 532-6292
I-39
<PAGE>
Copies to:
Gary W. Douglass
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.
900 Roosevelt Parkway
Chesterfield, Missouri 63017
Telecopy: (314) 532-6641
and
Silver, Freedman & Taff, L.L.P.
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Attention: Christopher R. Kelly, P.C.
Telecopy: (202) 682-0354
(ii) if to Sentinel Financial or Sentinel Federal, or both:
Sentinel Financial, Inc.
1001 Walnut Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64106
Attention: Craig D. Laemmli
President and Chief
Executive Officer
Telecopy: (816) 472-0045
Copy to:
Breyer & Aguggia
Suite 470 East
1300 I Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Attention: John F. Breyer, Jr., Esq.
Telecopy: (202) 737-7979
8.3 Miscellaneous. This Agreement (including the Schedules referred to
-------------
herein) (i) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all other prior
agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties, or any
of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof, including any
confidentiality agreement between the parties hereto, (ii) except as expressly
provided herein, is not intended to confer upon any person not a party hereto
any rights or remedies hereunder, (iii) shall be binding upon and shall inure to
the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns
and (iv) shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Delaware,
except as otherwise specifically provided herein or required by federal law or
regulation. The table of contents and headings contained in this Agreement are
for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts which together shall constitute a single agreement.
I-40
<PAGE>
Roosevelt Financial, Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel Financial and Sentinel
Federal have caused this Agreement to be duly executed by their authorized
representatives on the date first above written.
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION ROOSEVELT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
By: /s/ Craig D. Laemmli By: /s/ Stanley J. Bradshaw
----------------------- ------------------------
Name: Craig D. Laemmli Name: Stanley J. Bradshaw
Title: President and Chief Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer Executive Officer
Attested by: /s/ John C. Spencer Attested by: /s/ Gary W. Douglass
----------------------- ------------------------
Name: John C. Spencer Name: Gary W. Douglass
Title: Executive Vice President, Title: Executive Vice President and
Controller and Secretary Chief Financial Officer
SENTINEL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ROOSEVELT BANK
ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY
By: /s/ Craig D. Laemmli By: /s/ Stanley J. Bradshaw
----------------------- ------------------------
Name: Craig D. Laemmli Name: Stanley J. Bradshaw
Title: President and Chief Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer Executive Officer
Attested by: /s/ John C. Spencer Attested by: /s/ Gary W. Douglass
----------------------- ------------------------
Name: John C. Spencer Name: Gary W. Douglass
Title: Executive Vice President, Title: Executive Vice President and
Controller and Secretary Chief Financial Officer
I-41
<PAGE>
APPENDIX II
[LETTERHEAD OF TRIDENT FINANCIAL CORPORATION]
October 10, 1996
Board of Directors
Sentinel Financial Corporation
1001 Walnut Street
Kansas City, MO 64106
Gentlemen:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, to the holders of shares of common stock (the "Sentinel Common Stock")
of Sentinel Financial Corporation ("Sentinel") of the consideration to be
received by such stockholders in the Merger (the "Merger") of Sentinel with
Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc. ("Roosevelt"), pursuant to the Agreement and
Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated March 22, 1996 (the "Agreement").
As more specifically set forth in the Agreement, and subject to a number of
conditions and procedures described in the Agreement, in the Merger each of the
issued and outstanding shares of Sentinel Common Stock shall be converted into
1.4231 shares (the "Exchange Ratio") of Roosevelt Common Stock. All unexercised
options for the right to purchase shares of Sentinel Common Stock shall be
exchanged for Roosevelt options using the Exchange Ratio applicable to the
holders of Sentinel Common Stock.
Trident Financial Corporation ("Trident") is a financial consulting and
investment banking firm experienced in the valuation of business enterprises
with considerable experience in the valuation of thrift institutions. Since
1975, Trident has valued hundreds of thrift institutions in connection with
mutual-to-stock conversions, mergers and acquisitions, as well as other
transactions. Trident is not affiliated with Sentinel or Roosevelt.
In connection with rendering our opinion, we have reviewed and analyzed,
among other things, the following: (i) the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (ii) the
Agreement; (iii) certain publicly available information concerning Sentinel,
including the audited financial statements of Sentinel for each of the years in
the three year period ended June 30, 1996; (iv) certain publicly available
information concerning Roosevelt, including the audited financial statements of
Roosevelt for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1995
and unaudited financial statements for each of the six month periods ended
June 30, 1995 and 1996; (v) certain other internal information, primarily
financial in nature, concerning the business and operations of Sentinel and
Roosevelt furnished to us by Sentinel and Roosevelt for purposes of our
analysis; (vi) information with respect to the trading market for Sentinel
Common Stock; (vii) information with respect to the trading market for
Roosevelt Common
<PAGE>
Board of Directors
October 10, 1996
Page 2
Stock; (viii) certain publicly available information with respect to other
companies that we believe to be comparable to Sentinel and Roosevelt and the
trading markets for such other companies' securities; and (ix) certain publicly
available information concerning the nature and terms of other transactions that
we believe relevant to our inquiry. We have also met with certain officers and
employees of Sentinel and Roosevelt to discuss the foregoing as well as other
matters we believe relevant to our inquiry.
In our review and analysis and in arriving at our opinion, we have assumed
and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other
information provided to us or publicly available. We have not attempted
independently to verify any such information. We have not conducted a physical
inspection of the properties or facilities of Sentinel or Roosevelt, nor have we
made or obtained any independent evaluations or appraisals of any of such
properties or facilities. We did not specifically evaluate Sentinel's or
Roosevelt's loan portfolio or the adequacy of Sentinel's or Roosevelt's reserves
for possible loan losses.
In conducting our analysis and arriving at our opinion as expressed herein,
we have considered such financial and other factors as we have deemed
appropriate under the circumstances including, among others, the following: (i)
the historical and current financial condition and results of operations of
Sentinel and Roosevelt, including interest income, interest expense, net
interest income, net interest margin, interest sensitivity, non-interest
expenses, earnings, dividends, book value, return on assets, return on equity,
capitalization, the amount and type of non-performing assets and the reserve for
loan losses; (ii) the business prospects of Sentinel and Roosevelt; (iii) the
economies in Sentinel's and Roosevelt's market areas; (iv) the historical and
current market for Sentinel Common Stock and Roosevelt Common Stock and for the
equity securities of certain other companies that we believe to be comparable to
Sentinel and Roosevelt; and (v) the nature and terms of certain other
acquisition transactions that we believe to be relevant. We have also taken
into account our assessment of general economic, market, financial and
regulatory conditions and trends, as well as our knowledge of the thrift
industry, our experience in connection with similar transactions, and our
knowledge of securities valuation generally. Our opinion necessarily is based
upon conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date hereof. Our
opinion is, in any event, limited to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the consideration to be received by the holders of Sentinel Common
Stock in the Merger and does not address Sentinel's underlying business decision
to effect the Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the
consideration to be received by the holders of Sentinel Common Stock in the
Merger is fair, as of the date hereof, from a financial point of view, to such
holders.
This opinion is being delivered to the Board of Directors of Sentinel and
is not to be reproduced, disseminated or delivered to any third party without
the express written consent of Trident Financial Corporation, except as required
by law; provided, however, that we hereby consent to the inclusion of this
opinion as Appendix II to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus of Roosevelt and
Sentinel, dated October 10, 1996.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Trident Financial Corporation
TRIDENT FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<PAGE>
APPENDIX III
DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
SECTION 262
APPRAISAL RIGHTS.--(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to
subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who continuously
holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who
has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither
voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing
pursuant to Section 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the
Court of Chancery of the fair value of his shares of stock under the
circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in
this section, the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a
stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the
words "stock" and "share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those
words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock
corporation; and the words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other
instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in one or more
shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is
deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or
series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be
effected pursuant to Sections 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 or 264 of this title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this section
shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock which
stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed
to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at
the meeting of stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or
consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national securities exchange or
designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation
system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or (ii) held
of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no
appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of the
constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require
for its approval the vote of the holders of the surviving corporation as
provided in subsections (f) or (g) of Section 251 of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, appraisal rights
under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock of a constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required
by the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
Sections 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this title to accept for
such stock anything except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting
from such merger or consolidation, or depository receipts in respect
thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock or depository
receipts at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a
national market system security on an interdealer quotation system by
the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record
by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository
receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a. and b. of this
paragraph; or
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository receipts
and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts
described in the foregoing subparagraphs a., b. and c. of this
paragraph.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under Section 253 of this title is
not owned by the parent corporation immediately prior to the merger,
appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of the subsidiary
Delaware corporation.
<PAGE>
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that
appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any
class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of
incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of
the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision,
the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and
(e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which appraisal rights
are provided under this section is to be submitted for approval at a
meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to
the meeting, shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the
record date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal
rights are available pursuant to subsections (b) or (c) hereof that
appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the
constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a copy of this
section. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of his shares
shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of the vote on the
merger or consolidation, a written demand for appraisal of his shares. Such
demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to
demand the appraisal of his shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or
consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as herein
provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of such merger or
consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each
stockholder of each constituent corporation who has complied with this
subsection and has not voted in favor of or consented to the merger or
consolidation as of the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to Section
228 or 253 of this title, the surviving or resulting corporation, either
before the effective date of the merger or consolidation or within 10 days
thereafter, shall notify each of the stockholders entitled to appraisal
rights of the effective date of the merger or consolidation and that
appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the
constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy of this
section. The notice shall be sent by certified or registered mail, return
receipt requested, addressed to the stockholder at his address as it
appears on the records of the corporation. Any stockholder entitled to
appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of mailing of the
notice, demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation the
appraisal of his shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably
informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the
stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of his shares.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has
complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to
appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a
determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective
date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to
withdraw his demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the
merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger
or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of
subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to
receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the
consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted
in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for
appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares.
Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after
his written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or
resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for
delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) hereof, whichever is
later.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a
copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which
shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in
Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their
shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been
reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be
filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so
ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the
hearing of such petition by registered
III-2
<PAGE>
or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the
stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice
shall also be given by 1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of
the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of
Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The
forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court,
and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the
stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to
appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an
appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation
thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder
fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to
such stockholder.
(h) After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court
shall appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element
of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or
consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon
the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the
Court shall take into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair
rate of interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the
rate of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would have had to
pay to borrow money during the pendency of the proceeding. Upon application by
the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to
participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion,
permit discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the
appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an
appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section
and who has submitted his certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if
such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally
determined that he is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares,
together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the
stockholders entitled thereto. Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court
may direct. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of
holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares
represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the
certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as
other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving
or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed
upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon
application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the
expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal
proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the
fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all
the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no
stockholder who has demanded his appraisal rights as provided in subsection
(d) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to
receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date
which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided,
however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time
provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver
to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of his demand for
an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within 60
days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in
subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the
corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery
shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and
such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the
shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they
assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and
unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.
III-3
<PAGE>
REVOCABLE PROXY
SENTINEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
October 31, 1996
The undersigned hereby appoints the Board of Directors of Sentinel
Financial Corporation ("Sentinel"), and its survivor, with full power of
substitution, to act as attorneys and proxies for the undersigned to vote all
shares of common stock of Sentinel which the undersigned is entitled to vote at
the Special Meeting of Stockholders (the "Meeting"), to be held on Thursday,
October 31, 1996, at the downtown Kansas City office of Sentinel, located at
1001 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri at 10:00 a.m., local time, and at any
and all adjournments thereof, as follows:
The approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated
as of March 22, 1996, by and among Roosevelt Financial Group, Inc.,
Roosevelt Bank, Sentinel and Sentinel Federal Savings and Loan Association
of Kansas City (the "Merger Agreement"), and the transactions contemplated
thereby.
[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN
The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR"
the listed proposals.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, BUT IF NO INSTRUCTIONS ARE SPECIFIED, THIS
PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE PROPOSALS STATED. IF ANY OTHER BUSINESS IS
PRESENTED AT SUCH MEETING, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED BY THOSE NAMED IN THIS PROXY
IN THEIR BEST JUDGEMENT. AT THE PRESENT TIME, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS KNOWS OF
NO OTHER BUSINESS TO BE PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE
PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE ON ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME
BEFORE THE MEETING. HOWEVER, PROXIES INSTRUCTED TO VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSAL TO
APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY WILL NOT
BE VOTED FOR A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ADJOURNMENT OF THE MEETING IN THE EVENT THAT
THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT SHARES PRESENT IN PERSON OR BY PROXY AT THE MEETING TO
APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Should the undersigned be present and elect to vote at the Meeting or
at any adjournment thereof, and after notification to the Secretary of Sentinel
at the Meeting of the stockholder's decision to terminate this proxy, then the
power of such attorneys and proxies shall be deemed terminated and of no further
force and effect.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt from Sentinel, prior to the
execution of this proxy, of Notice of the Meeting and a Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
Dated:
---------------------- -------------------------------
PRINT NAME OF STOCKHOLDER
-------------------------------
SIGNATURE OF STOCKHOLDER
-------------------------------
PRINT NAME OF STOCKHOLDER
-------------------------------
SIGNATURE OF STOCKHOLDER
Please sign exactly as your name
appears on this card. When
signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give your full
title. If shares are held
jointly, each holder should
sign.
-------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE PROMPTLY COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY IN
THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE
-------------------------------------------------------------
