KEY PRODUCTION CO INC
S-4/A, EX-8.1, 2000-11-30
CRUDE PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS
Previous: KEY PRODUCTION CO INC, S-4/A, 2000-11-30
Next: KEY PRODUCTION CO INC, S-4/A, EX-23.1, 2000-11-30



<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 8.1

                    [LETTERHEAD OF SHERMAN & HOWARD L.L.C.]

                                                         November 29, 2000

Columbus Energy Corp.
1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 2400
Denver, CO 80264

Key Production Company, Inc.
707 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3300
Denver, CO 80202

  Re: Merger Pursuant to Agreement and Plan of Merger Among Company,
    Merger Sub and Key

Ladies and Gentlemen:

  We have acted as counsel to Columbus Energy Corp., a Colorado corporation
("Company") in connection with the proposed merger (the "Merger") of Key
Acquisition Two, Inc., a Colorado corporation ("Merger Sub"), with and into
the Company pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger ("Merger
Agreement") dated August 28, 2000, by and among Company, Merger Sub and Key
Production Company, Inc. a Delaware corporation ("Key"). Key owns all of the
outstanding stock of Merger Sub. This opinion is being delivered to you
pursuant to Section 7.02(e) of the Merger Agreement. Except as otherwise
provided, capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings set forth in
the Merger Agreement and the exhibits thereto or in the letters delivered to
Sherman & Howard L.L.C., by Key and Company containing certain representations
of Key and Company relevant to the opinion (the "Representation Letters"). All
section references, unless otherwise indicated, are to the United States
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").

  You have requested our opinion regarding certain federal income tax
consequences of the Merger. In our capacity as counsel to the Company in the
Merger, and for purposes of rendering this opinion, we have examined and
relied upon the Merger Agreement and the exhibits thereto, the Representation
Letters, and such other documents as we considered relevant for purposes of
this opinion. In our examination, we have assumed the authenticity of all
documents submitted to us as originals, the accuracy of all documents
submitted to us as copies and the authenticity of the originals of such
copies, the genuineness of signatures, and the legal capacity of signatories.

  We have assumed that all parties to the Merger Agreement and to any other
documents examined by us have acted, and will act, in accordance with the
terms of such Merger Agreement and documents and that the Merger will be
consummated at the Closing Date pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth
in the Merger Agreement without the waiver or modification of any such terms
and conditions. Furthermore, we have assumed that all representations
contained in the Merger Agreement, as well as those representations contained
in the Representation Letters, are, and at the Effective Date will be, true
and complete in all material respects, and that any representation made in any
of the documents referred to herein "to the best of the knowledge and belief"
(or similar qualification) of any person or party is correct without such
qualification. We have also assumed that as to all matters for which a person
or entity has represented that such person or entity does not have, or is not
aware of, any plan, intention, understanding, or agreement, there is no such
plan, intention, understanding, or agreement. We have not attempted to verify
independently such representations, but in the course of our representation,
nothing has come to our attention that would cause us to question the accuracy
of such representations.

  In rendering our opinion, we have considered the applicable provisions of
the Code, Treasury Regulations promulgated or proposed thereunder (the
"Regulations"), current published administrative positions of the Internal
Revenue Service ("Rulings"), and existing judicial authorities. New
developments in the Regulations, Rulings, judicial authorities or legislative
changes occurring after the Closing Date may have an adverse impact upon the
opinions expressed herein.
<PAGE>

  Our opinion represents our best judgment of how a court would decide if
presented with the issues addressed herein, but is not binding upon either the
Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") or any court. Thus, no assurances can be
given that a position taken in reliance on our opinion will not be challenged
by the IRS or rejected by a court.

  This opinion addresses only the specific United States federal income tax
consequences of the Merger set forth below, and does not address any other
federal, state, local, or foreign income, estate, gift, transfer, sales, use,
excise or other tax consequences that may result from the Merger or any other
transaction (including any transaction undertaken in connection with the
Merger). We express no opinion regarding the tax consequences of the Merger to
shareholders of Company that are subject to special tax rules, such as dealers
in securities, banks, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations and non-
United States persons.

  On the basis of, and subject to the foregoing, and in reliance upon the
representations and assumptions described above, we are of the opinion that:

  1. The Merger will constitute a reorganization within the meaning of
     Section 368(a)(1) of the Code, and Key, Merger Sub, and Company will be
     parties to such reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of
     the Code; and

  2.  Neither Key, Merger Sub, nor Columbus will recognize any gain or loss
      for United States federal income tax purposes as a result of the
      Merger.

  No opinion is expressed as to any other consequences of the Merger except as
specifically set forth herein, and this opinion may not be relied upon except
withrespect to the consequences specifically discussed herein. We expressly
consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement and to the reference of Sherman & Howard L.L.C. under the heading
"Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences" and "Legal Matters"
of the Proxy Statement. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we are in
the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          /s/ SHERMAN & HOWARD L.L.C.


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission