HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA
10KSB, 2000-02-25
INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS
Previous: OPPENHEIMER WORLD BOND FUND, 497, 2000-02-25
Next: VERSUS TECHNOLOGY INC, SC 13G, 2000-02-25



                                 FORM 10-KSB

                   U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
 [X]   ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
           SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

 [  ]  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
           SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission File Number 0-17321
                        Hitox Corporation of America
               (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

              Delaware                            74-2081929
  (State or other jurisdiction of    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   incorporation or organization)

        722 Burleson Street                         78402
       Corpus Christi, Texas                      (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

                  Issuer's telephone number: (361) 882-5175
        Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:  None.

            Securities registered under section 12(g) of the Act:
                        Common Stock, $0.25 par value

<PAGE>                               1

Check  whether  the  issuer (1) filed all reports required  to  be  filed  by
Section  13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months  (or  for
such  shorter period that the registrant was required to file such  reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
                           Yes    X       No
                                 ---              ---

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item  405
of  Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure  will  be
contained,  to  the  best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive  proxy  or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-
KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year:  $11,582,720

State  the aggregate market value of the voting stock (which consists  solely
of  shares  of Common Stock) held by non-affiliates of the registrant  as  of
February  14,  2000, computed by reference to the closing sale price  of  the
registrant's  Common Stock on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market tier of  the  Nasdaq
Stock Market on such date: $4,675,431

Number  of shares of the registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of February
14, 2000
                                  4,773,187

                    Documents incorporated by reference:

1.   Certain portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement
     to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the Annual
     Meeting of Stockholders of the registrant to be held May 5, 2000,
     are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
2.   Certain portions of the registrant's S-1 registration statement
     (File No. 33-25354) exhibits are incorporated by reference into
     Part IV of this report.

Transitional Small Business          Yes          No    X
Disclosure Format (check one):             ---         ---

<PAGE>                                 2

                                   PART I

ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

GENERAL

   Hitox  Corporation of America ("Hitox" or the "Company")  is  a  specialty
chemical  company  engaged  in  the business of manufacturing  and  marketing
mineral  products  for  use as pigments and pigment  extenders  used  in  the
manufacture  of  paints,  industrial coatings and  plastics.   The  Company's
principal   product,  HITOX  (Registered  trademark)  (high  grade   titanium
dioxide),  is  a  unique color pigment with a high titanium dioxide  content.
Titanium  dioxide  is  the primary pigment used by manufacturers  of  paints,
plastics  and paper to impart opacity and durability to the finished product.
HITOX  enjoys  a unique marketing niche as a lower cost, high  quality,  buff
color  pigment that can replace some of the other color pigments and some  or
all  of  the  white  titanium dioxide in customer's  formulations,  providing
significant  cost  savings.  HITOX is chemically inert and non-toxic.   HITOX
accounted for 74% of net sales in both 1999 and 1998.  The Company's strategy
includes  offering additional products to its HITOX customers.  To this  end,
Hitox  also manufactures and sells a line of barium sulfate pigment extenders
under the brand name BARTEX (Registered trademark) , alumina trihydrate under
the name HALTEX (Registered trademark) which is a filler used in plastics for
its  flame retardant properties, and sells iron oxide pigments under the name
OSO  (Registered trademark) which are used in primers, color concentrates and
other  specialty coatings for its color properties.  The Company manufactures
HITOX,  BARTEX  and  HALTEX at its manufacturing facility located  in  Corpus
Christi, Texas, U.S.A.

   The Company's products are currently marketed in the United States and  in
approximately 35 other countries.  The Company sells its products  through  a
network  of  direct  sales  representatives  employed  by  the  Company   and
independent  stocking  distributors  in  the  United  States,  as   well   as
distributors and agents overseas.  The Company's former Malaysian  subsidiary
manufactures  HITOX  pigment  under a licensing  agreement  and  sells  HITOX
pigment in Asia and in Europe.  Hitox receives royalties on sales made  under
this license agrrangement.  The Company's sales representatives sell directly
to  end  users  and provide marketing support and guidance for the  Company's
independent distribution network.  The Company has historically relied on  an
independent  distributor network to sell its products, supported  by  an  in-
house sales staff.

   The  Company was organized by Benilite Corporation of America ("Benilite")
in 1973.  Benilite, which was incorporated in Delaware in 1969, developed the
then  patented "Benilite process" for producing synthetic rutile ("SR"),  the
principal  ingredient used in the manufacture of HITOX,  from  ilmenite  ore.
Benilite  licensed and helped design several synthetic rutile plants  located
throughout the world which utilize this process (including a plant located in
Ipoh, Malaysia, which until September 21, 1994, was owned by the Company,  as
discussed below).  Benilite concluded that synthetic rutile produced  by  the

<PAGE>                                  3

Benilite  process  could  be further processed into a  buff-colored  titanium
dioxide pigment having many of the characteristics of standard white titanium
dioxide  at a significant cost savings.  These efforts by Benilite  were  the
beginning  of  the Company's business.  In 1980, the subsidiary  of  Benilite
engaged  in  the  development  of HITOX was  spun  off  by  Benilite  to  its
shareholders.  In December 1988, the Company became a publicly owned  company
after  completing  a  public offering of 1.38 million shares  of  its  common
stock.

   The  proceeds  of  the  public offering in 1988  were  used  to  purchase,
refurbish  and  operate a Malaysian synthetic rutile plant located  in  Ipoh,
Malaysia (the "Plant"). The Plant is owned and operated by Malaysian Titanium
Corporation Sdn. Bhd. ("MT").  The Company held a majority ownership position
in  MT  until  September 21, 1994, when it sold its entire  78.27%  ownership
interest   to   its  minority  partner,  Airtrust  International  Corporation
("Airtrust")  who  simultaneously sold a majority  interest  to  a  Malaysian
company.  The Company had acquired and refurbished the Plant in an attempt to
procure  a long term, reliable, reasonably priced source of synthetic rutile,
the  vital  raw material for producing HITOX pigment.  Though the  effort  to
refurbish  the Plant was successful, the Plant output exceeded the  Company's
needs for synthetic rutile to produce HITOX pigment.  The financial burden of
supporting MT was not sustainable and the Company was forced to sell  MT  and
recorded  a  loss on the sale in 1994.  As part of the sale transaction,  the
Company  entered into a supply agreement with MT, and MT continues to provide
the  Company with its vital raw material.  See "Subsequent Event" on page  11
for information regarding the Company's plans to reacquire MT.

RAW MATERIALS

   Titanium  dioxide pigment can be produced using ilmenite,  natural  rutile
or synthetic rutile and titanium slag.  Ilmenite is a black material found in
natural mineral deposits and typically has a titanium dioxide content ranging
from  44%  to 60%.  Ilmenite is found throughout the world, including  China,
India,  Australia and North America.  In Malaysia, ilmenite historically  has
been  recovered incidental to tin mining, but as tin mining has decreased  in
Malaysia,  that source of ilmenite has been declining.  Synthetic  rutile  is
produced  from ilmenite and typically has a titanium dioxide content  ranging
from  92%  to 95%.  There are ample sources of ilmenite and several producers
of  synthetic  rutile worldwide.  Natural rutile, a mineral with  a  titanium
dioxide  content  in the range of 95%, is less prevalent  than  ilmenite  and
existing reserves are being depleted.

   HITOX,  a  light  buff-colored  titanium dioxide  pigment,  is  made  from
synthetic  rutile.   The Company currently purchases  all  of  its  synthetic
rutile  from its former subsidiary MT.  The Company sold its entire ownership
interest  in  MT  in  1994 to its minority partner.   As  part  of  the  sale
transaction, a supply agreement for the supply of synthetic rutile by  MT  to
the Company (the "Supply Agreement") became effective December 15, 1994.  The
Supply Agreement had an initial term of five years and expired in December of
1999.

<PAGE>                               4

   A  new five-year supply contract (the "New Supply Agreement") was executed
with  the  existing supplier on September 28, 1999, and became  effective  on
December  16,  1999.  The New Supply Agreement has a take or pay  arrangement
but  reduces the quantity of material the Company is required to purchase and
continues with the pricing formula under the original Supply Agreement.   The
New  Supply Agreement provides that either party may terminate the  agreement
with twelve months prior notice.

   BARTEX  is  produced  from high grade barytes (barium  sulfate)  mined  in
China,  India, Turkey and Mexico.  The Company has not experienced  and  does
not  anticipate  having  difficulty in acquiring adequate  supplies  of  this
material.  Alumina trihydrate, the raw material used to manufacture HALTEX is
acquired domestically.  Some tightening of the supplies of alumina trihydrate
has  occurred  recently,  though  to this point  the  Company  has  not  been
adversely  affected.   The Company also has an adequate  supply  of  products
purchased from other companies for resale.

MANUFACTURING

HITOX Manufacturing Process

   HITOX   is   manufactured  from  synthetic  rutile  in  a  process   which
incorporates  fluid energy milling.  In this process, particles of  synthetic
rutile  mechanically abrade each other to form the end product,  which  after
other  processing,  including  testing and  quality  control  procedures,  is
collected for bagging and shipping.  The Company currently uses five  of  its
seven  fluid energy milling lines to manufacture HITOX pigment at its  Corpus
Christi plant.

   The  manufacturing  process for producing HITOX  is  not  simple  and  the
details  of the process and the operating parameters of the systems  are  not
widely known.  The HITOX manufacturing process is not patented.

Other Products

   BARTEX is a pigment extender or filler line which is used to increase  the
efficiency  of titanium dioxide pigment required for a particular application
and  because of its high specific gravity to add weight and strength  to  the
end product.  The Company's best selling BARTEX product is produced using the
fluid energy milling process using one dedicated fluid energy milling line.

   HALTEX  is  a  pigment filler line that is used primarily  for  its  flame
retardant  and  smoke suppressant properties in plastics and  coatings.   The
HALTEX   product  line  is  being  expanded  using  some  of  the  production
technologies  of  the Company's other products.  In 1999, one  of  the  fluid
energy milling lines was dedicated to the production of a small particle size
HALTEX pigment.

<PAGE>                               5

   OSO  iron  oxides  are  pigments that are used for  applications  such  as
primers,  pigment dispersions, color concentrates and other  coatings.   Iron
oxide  pigments are primarily used for their color contribution and  opacity.
The Company purchases OSO iron oxides from third parties for resale.

New Licensee

   A  license  agreement  was  executed in July  of  1999  with  MT  for  the
production by MT of HITOX pigment in Malaysia.  One fluid energy milling line
was installed in Malaysia in 1999, with plans for a second line in 2000.  The
Company receives royalty payments on sales of HITOX pigment produced and sold
by MT.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

   A  5,000  square  foot technical center was constructed at  the  Company's
plant location in Corpus Christi, Texas in 1992, that houses process control,
quality assurance, technical service, and research and development functions.
The  technical  services group was expanded in 1998 and focused  on  customer
service and development.  The Company did not incur significant research  and
development expense in 1999.

MANAGEMENT

   Mr.  Bernard Paulson, a director of the Company since 1992, was  appointed
President  and  Chief Executive Officer by the Board on June  1,  1999.   Mr.
Paulson had served as Acting Chief Executive Officer since November 1,  1998.
Mr.  Richard  L.  Bowers  was  appointed to the position  of  Executive  Vice
President/Director  of Sales and Marketing on June 1,  1999.   Mr.  Kelso  C.
Brooks,  Jr., the Company's Director of Technology since 1994, was  appointed
to the newly created position of Acting General Manager in late 1997, and was
appointed Senior Vice President on March 3, 1998.

MARKETING AND CUSTOMERS

Sales and Marketing Department Organization

   The  Company's sales effort is directed from Corpus Christi,  Texas,  with
all personnel reporting to the Executive Vice President/Director of Sales and
Marketing.  The Company has five regional sales managers who live and work in
their  respective territories, which include the Eastern, Western,  Southern,
Southeastern and Southwestern United States.  A sixth regional sales  manager
who  lives near Houston was responsible for Asia until his retirement at  the
beginning of 1999.  He will continue to act as a consultant for the  Company.
The  Company's  sales efforts for Asia are now directed by  its  licensee  in
Malaysia, MT.

<PAGE>                               6

   The Company's Corpus Christi sales and marketing department consists of  a
sales  service  representative  and  a  sales  and  marketing  administrative
coordinator.   The Company also has one sales agent whose territory  includes
the Central United States and whose focus is the PVC pipe market.

Technical Services Group Participation

   The  technical services group is located in Corpus Christi.  The group was
expanded  in  1998  and is involved in various aspects of  customer  service,
problem  solving  and product development, and actively participates  in  the
sales  effort.   The group has adapted by investing in advanced  technologies
and equipment which allow the technical services staff to assist customers in
formulating the Company's products into their applications.

Domestic Distributors and Agents

   The  Company's products are currently marketed by 18 independent  stocking
distributors and one agent located in 18 states with a combined  sales  force
of over 200 people.  Domestic distributors accounted for approximately 28% of
total net sales in 1999.

Foreign Distributors, Licensees and Agents

   There  are approximately 19 independent distributors selling the Company's
products  abroad.  The sales and marketing effort for all areas of the  world
except  Europe,  Israel and the Asia/Pacific region is directed  from  Corpus
Christi, Texas.  In 1997, the Company strengthened its relationship with  its
former  subsidiary by appointing MT master distributor for  the  Asia/Pacific
region,  as  well  as  Europe.  MT has established  a  sales  team  which  is
responsible   for  managing  the  distributor  relationships  in   individual
countries in the region, as well as directing the overall sales and marketing
effort.  With the addition of a HITOX milling line in Malaysia in 1999  under
a  new  license  agreement,  MT will both produce  and  sell  HITOX  pigment.
Foreign  sales through distributors accounted for approximately 4%  of  total
net sales in 1999 and 1998.

Customers

   End  use  customers of the Company's products include, among others,  such
companies  as PPG, Uponor, Dunn Edwards, J-M Manufacturing Co., The  Sherwin-
Williams  Company, Morton International, and Formosa Plastics.   The  top  10
direct  customers accounted for 42% of total net sales in  1999  and  39%  of
total sales in 1998.  The direct foreign customers accounted for 10% of total
net  sales  in  1999  and  7% of total net sales in 1998.   The  Company  has
historically maintained a relatively stable customer and distributor base.

<PAGE>                                  7

Geographic Distribution

   The  Company sells its products in the United States and markets  them  to
customers  located  in  approximately 35 foreign  countries.   The  Company's
foreign sales are made in U.S. dollars to avoid foreign currency risks.

   The  Company  maintains records reflecting the geographic distribution  of
its products, regardless of whether the sale was made directly by the Company
or  through  its  distributors from the Company's warehouse.   The  following
table  reflects  the  estimated  geographic  distribution  of  the  Company's
products for the periods shown.  Sales of the Company's products purchased by
distributors  for  resale are expressed in terms of the  price  paid  to  the
Company for its products by the distributors.


          Estimated Geographic Distribution     1999        1998
          ---------------------------------   --------     --------
          (in thousands of dollars)
          United States                       $  9,956     $ 10,280
          Canada & Mexico                        1,329        1,186
          South & Central America                   86            2
          Asia-Australia                           181           79
          Africa-Middle East                        31          172
          Europe                                    --           28
                                              --------     --------
             Total                            $ 11,583     $ 11,747
                                              ========     ========

Competition

   The  Company experiences competition with respect to each of its products.
Each  product sold by the Company is in direct competition in the market with
products which are similar.  In order to maintain sales volumes, the  Company
must  rely  on  its  ability  to  manufacture  and  distribute  products   at
competitive prices.  The Company believes that quality, delivery on  schedule
and price are the principal competitive factors.

   Competitors  range from large corporations with a full line of  production
capabilities  and products to small local firms specializing in  one  or  two
products.   A  number of these competitors are owned and  operated  by  large
diversified corporations.  Many of these competitors, such as E.I. DuPont  de
Nemours & Co., Inc., Millenium Chemical Inc., Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation
and  Kronos, Inc., have substantially greater financial and other  resources,
and their share of industry sales is substantially larger than the Company's.

   The  primary  competition  for HITOX is white  titanium  dioxide  pigment.
However,  HITOX historically has had a distinct price advantage  compared  to
white  titanium dioxide pigments.  The domestic white titanium  dioxide  list
price  is  approximately $1.01 per pound delivered while the truck load  list
price  of  HITOX, FOB Corpus Christi is $0.68 per pound.  HITOX is  primarily

<PAGE>                                  8

sold  FOB  plant, and white titanium dioxide manufacturers sell on a  freight
prepaid  basis.  Freight costs range from $0.01 to $0.05 per pound, depending
on destination.  During 1992, an imported buff-colored product was introduced
in the domestic market by a domestic distributor.  This direct competition is
not  believed  to  have had a material adverse impact on sales  of  HITOX  to
existing customers.

   It  is  possible  that  one  or more of the large,  diversified  companies
currently producing white titanium dioxide could at some future time endeavor
to enter the buff-colored titanium dioxide market.  The Company believes that
it  is  unlikely  that these companies would enter the buff-colored  titanium
dioxide market since (i) none of them has done so to date; (ii) under current
market   conditions,  they  can  sell  white  titanium  dioxide   at   prices
substantially above that for HITOX; (iii) in order to produce a  buff-colored
titanium  dioxide, they would have to incur the capital investment  costs  to
build  a  plant suitable to produce buff-colored titanium dioxide, since  the
production  process for the two products are very different;  and  (iv)  this
would  require  them to divert their resources to a product competitive  with
their  white  titanium dioxide, for which they have already made  substantial
capital investments.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND PRODUCT SAFETY

   The   Company's  plant  in  Corpus  Christi  is  subject  to   regulations
promulgated by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and  state
and  local authorities with respect to the discharge of substances  into  the
environment.   The  Company  believes that the Corpus  Christi  plant  is  in
compliance  with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations
relating to the discharge of substances into the environment, and it does not
expect  that  any  material  capital expenditures for  environmental  control
facilities will be necessary in order to continue such compliance.

   HITOX and the ingredient from which it is produced, synthetic rutile,  are
non-toxic  and  non-hazardous.  HITOX complies with all applicable  laws  and
regulations  enforced by the United States Food and Drug Administration  (the
"FDA")  and is an acceptable component of packaging materials used in  direct
contact  with  meat,  poultry  and other food products;  of  paints  used  in
incidental contact with such products; and of other packaging materials, such
as  paper  and  paperboard.  HITOX also complies with current color  additive
regulations promulgated by the FDA.  In addition, HITOX has been  tested  for
compliance  with  the  applicable  standards  promulgated  by  the   National
Sanitation  Foundation  (the "NSF"), and the Company  is  authorized  to  use
applicable NSF seals and/or logos in connection with the marketing of  HITOX.
This  authorization  is  significant in that end users  of  titanium  dioxide
pigments  who  wish  their  products to be NSF approved  must  use  component
materials that also meet NSF standards.

<PAGE>                                9

BACKLOG

   The  Company  normally manufactures its pigment products  in  anticipation
of, and not in response to, customer orders and generally fills orders within
a  short  time  after receipt.  Consequently, the Company seeks  to  maintain
adequate  inventories of its pigment products in order to permit it  to  fill
orders promptly after receipt.  As of February 14, 2000, the Company does not
have a significant backlog of customer orders.

SEASONALITY

   The  Company's  pigment  business has generally experienced  higher  sales
during  the  second  and third calendar quarters.  This  is  associated  with
increased activity in construction and maintenance during warm weather  which
increases demand for materials which use pigments such as paints and  plastic
pipe.

PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS

   The  Company currently holds no patents on the processes for manufacturing
any  of  its products.  Six of the Company's products, HITOX, BARTEX, HALTEX,
OSO,  UTOX and TITOX are marketed under names which have been registered with
the  United States Patent and Trademark Office.  Efforts have also been  made
to register trademarks in certain foreign countries.

   EMPLOYEES

   As  of  December  31,  1999,  the Company had  a  total  of  50  full-time
employees,  all  in the U.S.  None of the Company's employees  are  currently
covered by a collective bargaining agreement with a union.

ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

     From  1988  through  1997,  the  Company's corporate  headquarters  were
located  in  the  Furman Plaza Building ("the Building") in  downtown  Corpus
Christi,  Texas,  U.S.A.   The Company purchased the  Building  in  1988  for
$755,844.   In December of 1997, the Board of Directors approved  a  plan  to
sell the Building and move its personnel located there to the Company's plant
location.  The Company completed the sale of the Building on March  1,  1999,
for approximately its carrying value.

     The Company operates a plant in Corpus Christi, Texas which manufactures
HITOX,  BARTEX, and HALTEX.  The facility is located in the Rincon Industrial
Park  on approximately 14.86 acres of land, with 12.86 acres leased from  the
Port  of  Corpus Christi Authority (the "Port") and approximately  two  acres
owned  by  the Company.  The first lease, which covers 10 acres of the  plant
site, has a term of 30 years and expires in July 2017.  The lease payment  is
subject to adjustment every 5 years for what the Port calls the "equalization
valuation".   This is used as a means of equalizing rentals on  various  Port
lands  and  is determined solely at the discretion of the Port.   The  second
lease  with  the Port, which covers 2.86 acres, was renewed for its  final  5
year option term effective January 1, 1998.  The Company has an agreement  in

<PAGE>                               10

principal  with the Port to amend the current leases so that they  expire  no
earlier  than the year 2027.  As part of that agreement, the Company  intends
to  sell  the parcel of land that it owns to the Port and enter  into  a  new
lease  for  that property that expires in the same year as the  existing  two
leases.

     The  Company owns the improvements on the plant site, including a  3,400
square-foot  office, a 5,000 square-foot laboratory building,  a  maintenance
shop  and several manufacturing and warehousing buildings containing a  total
of  approximately  90,000 square feet of space.  The leased premises  include
approximately 350 lineal feet of bulkheaded industrial canal frontage,  which
provides  access to the Gulf of Mexico intercoastal waterway  system  through
the  Corpus  Christi  ship channel.  This property  also  is  serviced  by  a
railroad spur which runs through the Company's property to the canal.

     Management  believes  that all of the facilities and  equipment  of  the
Company are adequately insured.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     The  Company  is  involved  in  routine  litigation  incidental  to  its
business.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     No  matters  were  submitted to a vote of security  holders  during  the
fourth quarter of the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     The names  of  the  members  of the  Company's executive officers at
December 31, 1999, each of whom is elected annually, are set forth below:

        Name          Age               Position             Hitox Since
        ----          ---               --------             -----------
Bernard Paulson        71   President and Chief                  1992
                            Executive Officer

Richard L. Bowers      57   Executive Vice President and         1999
                            Director of Sales and Marketing

Kelso C. Brooks, Jr.   52   Senior Vice President                1991

Craig Schkade          45   Chief Financial                      1989
                            Officer and Treasurer

Elizabeth Morgan       58   Secretary                            1988

<PAGE>                               11

     Bernard  Paulson was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer  by
the Board on June 1, 1999.  He has been a director of the Company since 1992.
Mr.  Paulson  was Chief Executive Officer of Inspection Group,  Inc.  and  is
retired President of Koch Refining Company with over 40 years experience with
other companies in the refining and petrochemical industries, including Kerr-
McGee Corporation.

     Richard Bowers was appointed Executive Vice President/Director of  Sales
and  Marketing on June 1, 1999.  He joined Benilite in 1969 and was stationed
in  Singapore and Malaysia.  In 1971 Mr. Bowers joined the staff of the Hitox
Division of Benilite in Corpus Christi and was employed until the spin-off of
the  Company  in 1980.  From 1980 until 1994 he held positions of  President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company.  From  1994
to June 1999, Mr. Bowers was a Director and Owner of Environmental Analytics,
Inc., an environmental services business based in Houston, Texas.  Mr. Bowers
has a Bachelors of Arts degree from Furman University.

     Kelso  C.  Brooks, Jr., was appointed Senior Vice President on March  3,
1998.   Mr.  Brooks  joined  Hitox in 1991 and  has  served  as  Director  of
Technology  since  1994.  Prior to joining Hitox, Mr. Brooks  has  served  as
Operations  Manager,  Process Control Manager, Plant Manager,  and  in  other
managerial  positions  with Cities Service Company  and  Columbian  Chemicals
Company.   He  received  his  Bachelor  of  Chemical  Engineering  from   the
University of Arkansas.

     Craig Schkade was named Treasurer in 1993 and Chief Financial Officer in
January  of 1994.  Mr. Schkade joined Hitox in 1989, and served as Controller
until  transferring to the Company's Malaysian subsidiary in 1990,  where  he
was  General  Manager.  He returned to Corpus Christi  in  1991,  and  became
Director  of  Corporate Development.  Prior to joining Hitox,  he  was  Chief
Accountant at the Port of Corpus Christi, and prior to that, worked in public
accounting  with KPMG Peat Marwick.  Mr. Schkade holds a Master  of  Business
Administration degree from Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi  and  Bachelor
of Business Administration degrees from the University of Texas at Austin and
the University of Texas at Tyler.  He is a Certified Public Accountant.

     Elizabeth  Morgan  has served as Secretary since November  1988  and  as
Assistant  to  the  President since September 1988.   Prior  to  joining  the
Company, she served as Administrative Assistant to the President of Carl  Oil
&  Gas  Co., an independent oil and gas exploration company based  in  Corpus
Christi, Texas.

     No executive officer of the Company has any family relationship with any
other director or executive officer of the Company.

<PAGE>                                12

                                   PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

   The  Company became a publicly owned company in December, 1988.  Prior  to
that  time,  the  Company's  stock was not listed  or  traded  on  any  stock
exchange.  From February 7, 1989, to February 10, 1995, the Company's  common
stock  was  listed and traded on the National Market System of  the  National
Association  of  Securities  Dealers  Automated  Quotation  System   (Nasdaq)
(symbol:  HTXA), and since February 10, 1995, has been listed and  traded  on
the  Nasdaq SmallCap Market System.  The table below sets forth the high  and
low  closing  sales  price  of the Company's common  stock  for  the  periods
indicated, according to published sources.


          Quarter Ended  March 31  June 30  Sept. 30  Dec. 31
          -------------  --------  -------  --------  -------
            1999 High    $ 2.188   $ 3.313  $ 2.375   $ 2.000
                 Low       1.438     2.000    2.000     1.375

            1998 High      2.125     2.438    2.125     2.125
                 Low       1.469     1.688    1.000     1.250

   The  reduction  in  net tangible assets occasioned  by  the  sale  of  the
Company's  two foreign operating subsidiaries, MT and FME, along with  annual
net  losses,  required the Company's securities to be moved from  the  Nasdaq
National  Market  System  to  the  Nasdaq SmallCap  Market  System  effective
February 10, 1995.

   No  cash dividends have ever been paid on the Company's Common Stock.  The
Company  is  prohibited from paying cash dividends under its  loan  agreement
with  Bank of America (formerly NationsBank, N.A.).  (See Note 5 of Notes  to
Financial Statements.)

   The  approximate number of holders of record of the Company's Common Stock
as  of  December 31, 1999 was 101.  In addition, there are approximately  750
beneficial shareholders.

ITEM 6.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
         AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

   Net  Sales:   Net sales for 1999 were $11,582,720, a decrease of  $164,314
or  1.4%  compared with 1998 net sales of $11,747,034.  Total 1999  sales  of
HITOX  pigment accounted for 73.9% or $8,556,122 of total sales  in  1999,  a
decrease  of  2.1%, as compared with $8,736,653, or 74.4% of total  sales  in
1998.   The  decrease in HITOX pigment sales was partially  offset  by  a  3%
increase in the sale of BARTEX pigments.  The Company's financial performance
continues to be dependent on sales of the single product line, HITOX pigment.

<PAGE>                                13

   The  Company's  net sales in the U.S. decreased by 3.2%, to $9,955,616  in
1999  from  $10,279,597  in  1998.  Net sales for use  in  foreign  countries
increased  by  $159,667 or 10.9% to $1,627,104 in 1999,  from  $1,467,437  in
1998.   Sales  increased in 1999 to Mexico, South America and  Asia  compared
with 1998.

   Cost  of  Sales:  Total cost of sales in 1999 decreased $194,822  or  2.4%
from  1998.   Accompanying  the lower 1999 sales  volumes,  production  costs
decreased  in  1999  due  to higher production volumes  and  a  corresponding
increase  in  finished goods inventory.  Gross profit increased to  30.2%  in
1999 compared with 29.6% for 1998.

   General,    Administrative   and   Selling   Expenses:    Total   general,
administrative and selling expenses for 1999 were $2,606,791, an increase  of
$201,725  or  8.4%, compared with 1998.  This increase is  due  primarily  to
higher selling expenses resulting from an increase in the number of sales and
marketing  employees in 1999.  As a percentage of sales, these expenses  were
22.5%  in  1999, and 20.5% in 1998.  Bad debt expense has been  insignificant
during both periods.

   Adjustment  of  Asset Held for Sale to Fair Market  Value:   In  1998  the
Company  consolidated  all  of  its Corpus Christi  personnel  at  its  plant
location  and  placed its former corporate headquarters building  located  in
downtown  Corpus Christi for sale.  The Company recorded a charge of  $90,600
in  the  fourth  quarter of 1997 to reduce the building to  fair  value.   An
additional charge of $120,000 was recorded in the first quarter of 1998 based
on  an  offer  it  accepted for purchase of the building.  The  sale  of  the
building  was  completed  on  March 1, 1999, for approximately  its  carrying
value.

   Interest  Income:   Interest  income was $88,745  in  1999  compared  with
$78,904  in 1998, an increase of 12.5% which resulted from higher daily  cash
balances in 1999 available for investment.

   Interest  Expense:   Interest expense in 1999 decreased  $45,909  compared
with 1998.  The decrease was the result of pre-paying the Company's term note
in the first quarter of 1999.

   Income  Taxes:  The Company has net operating loss and other carryforwards
available  to  offset  the Company's regular taxable  income.   However,  the
Company is subject to alternative minimum tax, and a provision for income tax
of $17,000 was recorded in 1999 and $13,000 in 1998.

   Cash  and  Cash  Equivalents:  The balance in cash  and  cash  equivalents
increased  $592,478 from the end of 1998 to the end of 1999.   This  increase
was  the  result of positive cash flow from operations, net of cash  used  in
investing and financing activities.

<PAGE>                                14

   Inventories:   Inventories increased $1,185,490 from the end  of  1998  to
the  end  of  1999.   The primary reason for the increase  was  required  raw
material  purchases  under  a  supply agreement  with  the  Company's  former
subsidiary,  Malaysian  Titanium  Corporation.   Also  contributing  to   the
increase  was planned higher finished goods inventory at year end 1999  as  a
precaution against year 2000 related production problems.

   Accounts  Payable:  The accounts payable increased $602,786 from  the  end
of  1998 to the end of 1999.  The increase is due primarily to an increase in
raw material accounts payable for goods in transit.

   Notes  Payable  to  Banks:   There was no outstanding  balance  under  the
Company's bank line of credit at the end of 1998 or 1999.

   Accrued  Expenses:  The increase in accrued expenses of $51,671  from  the
end  of  1998  to the end of 1999 is primarily the result of an  increase  in
accrued inventory costs, primarily for ocean freight.

   Current  Maturities of Long-term Debt: The Company prepaid one of its  two
term  loans  in the first quarter of 1998.  The remaining term  note  was  to
mature  at  the  end of 1999.  The Company prepaid this remaining  term  note
effective January 15, 1999, leaving the Company debt free.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

   The  Company  has  a  strong  balance sheet  at  the  end  of  1999,  with
significant cash and no debt.  Working capital increased $1,440,939 or 21% to
$8,306,506  at  December 31, 1999 compared with $6,865,567  at  December  31,
1998.   In 1999, cash increased $592,478, with operating activities providing
$1,009,378, while $51,688 was used in investing activities, and $365,212  was
used in financing activities.

   The  Company  on an ongoing basis will finance its operations  principally
through cash flow generated by operations, through bank financing and through
cash  on  hand.   The  Company has a continuing need for working  capital  to
finance  raw  material  purchases,  primarily  synthetic  rutile,  which   is
purchased  under a supply agreement (the "Supply Agreement") with its  former
subsidiary, Malaysian Titanium Corporation.  The Supply Agreement, which  had
an  initial  term  of five years, expired in December 1999.   A  shipment  is
planned  in  the first quarter of year 2000 that will fullfill the  Company's
purchase obligations under the Supply Agreement.

   A  new five-year supply contract (the "New Supply Agreement") was executed
with  the  existing supplier on September 28, 1999, and became  effective  on
December  16,  1999,  with the same pricing formula as  the  original  Supply
Agreement.  The New Supply Agreement is a take or pay arrangement but reduces
the  quantity  of  material the Company is required to  purchase.    The  New
Supply  Agreement  can  be terminated by either party with  one  years  prior
notice.

<PAGE>                                15

   As  discussed in the section titled "Subsequent Events" below, the Company
may  acquire a controlling ownership interest in MT, and up to 100% ownership
of  MT.   Such a transaction could affect the purchases under the New  Supply
Agreement.   MT's  liquidity is dependent upon the purchases  of  SR  by  the
Company.   Any  adjustment  in the terms of the New  Supply  Agreement  would
consider  the  liquidity needs and resources of both MT and the Company,  and
would attempt to balance the needs of both companies.

   The  Company has a loan agreement with Bank of America (the "Bank"), which
provides  the Company with a $2,000,000 line of credit.  The Company  had  no
balance outstanding under the line of credit during 1999.  The loan agreement
was renewed (the "Renewal") effective July 17, 1998, and reduced the interest
rate  from  the Bank's prime rate plus 0.75% to the Bank's prime  rate.   The
line  of credit is secured by accounts receivable and inventory.  The Renewal
included one term loan which had a balance of $389,249 at December 31,  1998,
an  interest rate of 8.17%, and monthly payments of $31,415.  The  term  loan
was  scheduled  to  mature  in January 31, 2000, but  was  prepaid  effective
January  15,  1999.  The Renewal expires on April 30, 2000  and  the  Company
believes  that a new agreement will be reached with the Bank or another  bank
on terms at least as favorable as the expiring agreement.

OTHER MATTERS

Inflation

   Inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company's business,  and
it is not expected to have a major impact in the foreseeable future.

Change in Management

   Mr.  Bernard  Paulson was appointed President and Chief Executive  Officer
by  the  Board on June 1, 1999.  Prior to this appointment, Mr.  Paulson  had
served  in  a  part-time  capacity as Acting Chief  Executive  Offcier  since
November  1,  1997.   Mr.  Richard L. Bowers  was  appointed  Executive  Vice
President/Director  of Sales and Marketing on June 1,  1999.   Mr.  Kelso  C.
Brooks,  Jr., the Company's Director of Technology since 1994, was  appointed
to the newly created position of Acting General Manager in late 1997, and was
appointed Senior Vice President on March 3, 1998.

   Several  changes have been made under Mr. Paulson, including consolidation
of  all  corporate and finance personnel at the Company's plant  location  in
early  1998  to  provide better efficiency and communication.  The  Company's
former  corporate headquarters building was listed for sale.  After being  on
the  market  for  over a year, the building was sold on March  1,  1999,  for
approximately its carrying value.

<PAGE>                                16

Impact of the Year 2000

   In  prior  years,  the Company discussed the nature and  progress  of  its
plans  to become Year 2000 ready.  The Company's primary computer system  and
most other peripheral equipment was substantially Year 2000 ready by the  end
of  1998.  In 1999, the Company completed the testing of its systems.   As  a
result  of those planning and implementation efforts, the Company experienced
no significant disruptions in mission critical information technology and non-
information  technology  systems  and  believes  those  systems  successfully
responded  to  the  Year 2000 date change.  The Company  did  not  incur  any
material  expense  in 1999 in connection with remediating its  systems.   The
Company  is  not  aware  of any material problems resulting  from  Year  2000
issues,  either with its products, its internal systems, or the products  and
services of third parties.  The Company will continue to monitor its  mission
critical  computer  applications  and those  of  its  suppliers  and  vendors
throughout the year 2000 to ensure that any latent Year 2000 matters that may
arise are addressed promptly.

Forward Looking Information

   Certain  portions of this report contain forward-looking statements  about
the  business, financial condition and prospects of the Company.  The  actual
results  of the Company could differ materially from those indicated  by  the
forward-looking  statements  because  of  various  risks  and   uncertainties
including, without limitation, changes in demand for the Company's  products,
changes in competition, economic conditions, fluctuations in market price for
TiO2  pigments,  interest rate fluctuations, changes in the capital  markets,
changes  in  tax  and  other  laws  and governmental  rules  and  regulations
applicable  to  the  Company's business, and other  risks  indicated  in  the
Company's filing with the Security and Exchange Commission.  These risks  and
uncertainties are beyond the ability of the Company to control, and, in  many
cases,  the  Company  cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties  that
could  cause its actual results to differ materially from those indicated  by
the  forward-looking  statements.   When  used  in  this  report,  the  words
"believes,"  "estimates,"  "plans,"  "expects,"  "anticipates"  and   similar
expressions  as they relate to the Company or its management are intended  to
identify forward-looking statements.

Subsequent Events

   On  January  3,  2000,  the Company signed a Memorandum  of  Understanding
(Letter  of  Intent) with Megamin Ventures Sdn. Bhd. to acquire a controlling
interest  (up  to  100% of the shares) in the Malaysian Titanium  Corporation
("MT"),  subject  to  completion  of  a satisfactory  due  diligence  review,
negotiation  and execution of a definitive acquisition agreement between  the
parties,  receipt  of  regulatory approvals and  receipt  of  an  appropriate
fairness opinion.  The parties are continuing efforts towards negotiating the
terms of a definitive acquisition agreement.

<PAGE>                                  17

   MT  is  the Company's sole supplier of Synthetic Rutile, the raw  material
for  the Company's proprietary titanium pigment HITOXr.  MT is also producing
and selling HITOX pigment in Asia under a license from the Company.

   MT  was  previously  a subsidiary of Hitox Corporation  and  was  sold  to
Megamin  Ventures  Sdn  Bhd  and other investors in  1994.   The  acquisition
provides the opportunity to control the raw material supply for the Company's
primary  product,  HITOX pigment, and represents both a low  cost  production
site for HITOX pigment and marketing opportunities outside the U.S. market.

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   The  Financial Statements are set out in this annual report on Form 10-KSB
commencing on page F-1.

ITEM 8.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
         AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

   No  disagreements  between the Company and its accountants  have  occurred
within  the  24-month period prior to the date of the Company's  most  recent
financial statements or during any subsequent interim period.


                                  PART III

ITEM 9.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
         COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

   Information  which  will  be  contained under  the  caption  "Election  of
Directors"  in the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement for its  2000  Annual
Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated by reference in response to this Item
9.   See  Item  4,  Part  I  of this Form 10-KSB for the  caption  "Executive
Officers" for information concerning executive officers.

ITEM 10.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   Information  under  the caption "Executive Compensation",  which  will  be
contained  in  the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement for its  2000  Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

   Information   under  the  caption  "Executive  Compensation   -   Security
Ownership of Management", which will be contained in the Company's Definitive
Proxy  Statement for its 2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, is incorporated
herein by reference.

<PAGE>                               18

ITEM 12.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

   The  discussion under the caption "Certain Transactions",  which  will  be
contained  in  the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement for its  2000  Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, is incorporated herein by reference.


                                   PART IV

ITEM 13.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)  The following documents are being filed as part of this annual
     report on Form 10-KSB:
   1.  Financial Statements - The financial statements filed as part of
       this report are listed in the
       "Index to Financial Statements" on page F-1 hereof.
   2.  Exhibits - The Exhibits listed below are filed as part of, or
       incorporated by reference into, this report.


Exhibit No.                          Description
- -----------                          -----------

3.1(1)       Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as amended
             through January 28, 1988
3.2(2)       Certificate of Amendment to the Company's Certificate of
             Incorporation, filed May 28, 1991
3.3(1)       By-laws of the Company
3.4(4)       Amendment to the By-laws of the Company dated June 1, 1994
3.5(7)       Amendment to the By-laws of the Company dated February 28,
             1995
4.1(1)       Form of Common Stock Certificate
4.2(3)       Form of Convertible Subordinated Debenture of the Company
             dated June 15, 1992 and related purchase agreements
4.3(4)       Form of First Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement
             covering the Convertible Subordinated Debenture of the
             Company dated September 30, 1994
4.4(5)       Form of Second Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement
             covering the Convertible Subordinated Debenture of the
             Company dated February 28, 1995
4.5(5)       Form of Warrant Agreement for issuance of 50,000 warrants
             dated September 30, 1994
4.6(5)       Form of Warrant Agreement for issuance of 50,000 warrants
             dated February 28, 1995
4.7(5)       Form of Warrant Agreement for issuance of 1,111,111 warrants
             dated February 28, 1995

<PAGE>                                  19

10.1(6)      Loan Agreement with NationsBank dated August 31, 1995
10.2(8)      First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated July 31, 1996
10.3(1)      Lease from Port of Corpus Christi Authority dated April 14,
             1987
10.4(1)      Lease from Port of Corpus Christi Authority dated January
             12, 1988 as amended on December 24, 1992
10.5(9)      Second Amendment to Loan Agreement with NationsBank dated
             July 17, 1998
10.6(1)      Summary Plan Description for the Hitox Profit Sharing Plan &
             Trust
21           Subsidiaries of Registrant:  No significant subsidiaries
23           Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
24           Supply Agreement with Malaysian Titanium Corporation
             Sdn. Bhd. dated September 28, 1999

_________________________________

(1) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant's
    Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-25354) filed November 3,
    1988, which registration statement became effective December 14,
    1988.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the 1991 Form 10-K.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K dated June 15, 1992.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the 1994 Form 10-KSB.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the March 31, 1995 Form 10-QSB.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the September 30, 1995 Form 10-QSB.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the 1995 Form 10-KSB.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the June 30, 1996 Form 10-QSB.
(9) Incorporated by reference to the 1998 Form 10-KSB.


(b)    Reports on Form 8-K.  No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the
       Company during the quarter ended December 31, 1999.

<PAGE>                               20

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant  to  the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                   HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                                   (Registrant)

                               By             BERNARD A. PAULSON
                                    -------------------------------------
Date:  February 25, 2000            (Bernard A. Paulson, President & CEO)


     Pursuant  to  the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934,
this  report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of  the
registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.


        Signatures         Capacity with the Company         Date
        ----------         -------------------------         ----

    BERNARD A. PAULSON           President and         February 25, 2000
- --------------------------  Chief Executive Officer
   (Bernard A. Paulson)             Director


      CRAIG SCHKADE         Chief Financial Officer    February 25, 2000
- --------------------------       and Treasurer
     (Craig Schkade)        (Principal Financial and
                              Accounting Officer)

 CHRISTOPHER J. McGOUGAN     Chairman of the Board     February 25, 2000
- --------------------------
(Christopher J. McGougan)

    RICHARD L. BOWERS       Executive Vice President   February 25, 2000
- --------------------------        and Director
   (Richard L. Bowers)

    W. CRAIG EPPERSON               Director           February 25, 2000
- --------------------------
   (W. Craig Epperson)

     THOMAS W. PAUKEN               Director           February 25, 2000
- --------------------------
    (Thomas W. Pauken)

<PAGE>                                21

                        HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA

                        ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

                                   ITEM 7



INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                                                                      Page
                                                                      ----
Hitox Corporation of America

    Report of Independent Auditors                                     23

    Balance Sheets - December 31, 1999 and 1998                        24

    Statements of Income - Years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998      26

    Statements of Shareholders' Equity-Years ended
       December 31, 1999 and 1998                                      27

    Statements of Cash Flows-Years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998    28

    Notes to Financial Statements                                      29

<PAGE>                               22

                Report of Ernst & Young Independent Auditors



Board of Directors and Shareholders
Hitox Corporation of America
Corpus Christi, Texas


   We  have  audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hitox Corporation  of
America  as  of  December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the  related  statements  of
income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on these financial statements  based
on our audits.

   We  conducted  our audits in accordance with auditing standards  generally
accepted  in  the United States.  Those standards require that  we  plan  and
perform  the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements  are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes  examining,
on  a  test  basis,  evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures  in  the
financial  statements.   An  audit  also includes  assessing  the  accounting
principles  used  and significant estimates made by management,  as  well  as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

   In  our  opinion,  the  financial statements  referred  to  above  present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hitox Corporation
of  America  at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations
and  its  cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with  accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.




ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Antonio, Texas
February 18, 2000

<PAGE>                                  23

                        HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                               BALANCE SHEETS

                                                   December 31,
                                           ----------------------------
                                               1999            1998
                                           ------------    ------------
                  ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
  Cash and cash equivalents                $  2,329,877    $  1,737,399
  Receivables:
    Trade accounts receivable; no
      allowance for doubtful accounts
      considered necessary                    1,333,680       1,310,663
    Other                                        11,802          40,258
                                           ------------    ------------
      Total Receivables                       1,345,482       1,350,921
  Inventories                                 6,489,840       5,304,350
  Other current assets                           41,937          44,869
                                           ------------    ------------
      Total current assets                   10,207,136       8,437,539

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net            2,709,868       2,502,748
ASSET HELD FOR SALE                                  --         651,055
OTHER ASSETS                                     43,200          25,175
                                           ------------    ------------
                                           $ 12,960,204    $ 11,616,517
                                           ============    ============



                           See accompanying notes

<PAGE>                                 24

                        HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                               BALANCE SHEETS

                                                   December 31,
                                           ----------------------------
                                               1999            1998
                                           ------------    ------------
   LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
  Accounts payable                         $    578,224    $    196,123
  Accounts payable - MT                         810,920         590,235
  Accrued expenses                              511,486         396,365
  Current maturities of long-term debt               --         389,249
                                           ------------    ------------
      Total current liabilities               1,900,630       1,571,972

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
  Preferred stock $.01 par value:
    authorized, 5,000,000 shares;
    no shares outstanding                            --              --
  Common stock $.25 par value:
    authorized, 10,000,000 shares;
    4,773,187 shares outstanding at
    12/31/99;  and  4,657,487 shares
    outstanding after deducting 88,240
    shares held in treasury at 12/31/98       1,193,297       1,186,432
  Additional paid-in capital                 14,315,410      14,341,193
  Accumulated deficit                        (4,449,133)     (5,440,125)
                                           ------------    ------------
                                             11,059,574      10,087,500
  Less:  cost of treasury stock                      --         (42,955)
                                           ------------    ------------
      Total shareholders' equity             11,059,574      10,044,545
                                           ------------    ------------
                                           $ 12,960,204    $ 11,616,517
                                           ============    ============




                           See accompanying notes

<PAGE>                               25

                        HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                            STATEMENTS OF INCOME


                                               Years Ended December 31,
                                            -------------------------------
                                                1999               1998
                                            -------------     -------------
NET SALES                                   $  11,582,720     $  11,747,034
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
  Cost of sales                                 8,080,883         8,275,705
  General, administrative
    and selling expenses                        2,606,791         2,405,066
  Adjustment of asset held for sale
    to fair market value                               --           120,000
                                            -------------     -------------
OPERATING INCOME                                  895,046           946,263

OTHER INCOME  (EXPENSE):
  Interest expense                                 (3,853)          (49,762)
  Interest income                                  88,745            78,904
  Other, net                                       28,054             7,728
                                            -------------     -------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX                        1,007,992           983,133

  Current income tax expense                       17,000            13,000
                                            -------------     -------------
NET INCOME                                  $     990,992     $     970,133
                                            =============     =============

Earnings per Common Share
  Basic                                     $        0.21     $        0.21
                                            =============     =============

  Diluted                                   $        0.21     $        0.21
                                            =============     =============

Weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding
  Basic                                         4,718,093         4,657,487
                                            =============     =============
  Diluted                                       4,765,002         4,688,374
                                            =============     =============


                           See accompanying notes

<PAGE>                                26


<TABLE>
                          HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                       STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<CAPTION>
                           COMMON STOCK       ADDITIONAL                TREASURY STOCK
                       --------------------    PAID-IN   ACCUMULATED   ------------------
                        SHARES     AMOUNT      CAPITAL     DEFICIT      SHARES    AMOUNT      TOTAL
                       --------- ---------- ------------  ------------ -------- ---------  -----------
<S>                    <C>       <C>        <C>           <C>           <C>     <C>        <C>
BALANCE AT
  JANUARY 1, 1998      4,745,727 $1,186,432 $14,341,193   $(6,410,258)   88,240 $(42,955)  $ 9,074,412

  Net Income                  --         --          --       970,133        --       --       970,133
                       --------- ---------- -----------   -----------   -------  -------   -----------
BALANCE AT
  DECEMBER 31, 1998    4,745,727  1,186,432  14,341,193    (5,440,125)   88,240  (42,955)   10,044,545

  Issuance of shares
   in exchange
   for warrants           11,760      2,940      (2,940)           --        --       --            --

  Issuance of treasury
   stock in exchange
   for warrants               --         --     (42,955)           --   (88,240)  42,955            --

  Exercise of
   stock options          15,700      3,925      20,112            --        --       --        24,037

  Net Income                  --         --          --       990,992        --       --       990,992
                       --------- ---------- -----------   -----------   -------  -------   -----------
BALANCE AT
  DECEMBER 31, 1999    4,773,187 $1,193,297 $14,315,410   $(4,449,133)       --  $    --   $11,059,574
                       ========= ========== ===========   ===========   =======  =======   ===========
</TABLE>
                             See accompanying notes

<PAGE>                                27

                        HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                           STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

                                                Years Ended December 31,
                                               ----------------------------
                                                   1999            1998
                                               -----------      -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
  Net Income                                   $   990,992      $   970,133
  Adjustments to reconcile net income
    to net cash provided by (used in)
    operating activities:
    Depreciation                                   505,877          522,337
    Gain on sale of property,
      plant and equipment                          (10,255)          (1,799)
    Adjustment of asset held for sale
      from cost to fair market value                    --          120,000
    Other assets                                   (18,025)           2,409
 Changes in working capital:
    Receivables                                      5,439         (245,600)
    Inventories                                 (1,185,490)        (404,778)
    Other current assets                             2,932          (13,907)
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses          717,907           41,344
                                               -----------      -----------
        Net cash provided by
          operating activities                   1,009,377          990,139

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
  Additions to property, plant and equipment      (718,076)        (332,078)
  Proceeds from sales of property,
    plant and equipment                            666,389            2,125
                                               -----------      -----------
    Net cash used in investing activities          (51,687)        (329,953)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
  Payments on long-term debt                      (389,249)        (642,429)
  Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
    and exercise of common stock options            24,037               --
                                               -----------      -----------
    Net cash used in financing activities         (365,212)        (642,429)

NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS          592,478           17,757
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS BEGINNING OF YEAR      1,737,399        1,719,642
                                               -----------      -----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS END OF YEAR          $ 2,329,877      $ 1,737,399
                                               ===========      ===========
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
   Income taxes paid                           $    17,000      $    13,000
   Interest paid                                     3,853           49,762


                           See accompanying notes

<PAGE>                                 28

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business Description

   Hitox  Corporation  of  America ("Hitox" or  the  "Company"),  a  Delaware
Corporation,  is engaged in a single industry, the manufacture  and  sale  of
mineral  products  for  use  as  pigments and  extenders,  primarily  in  the
manufacture of paints, industrial coatings and plastics.  Until their sale in
September  1994,  the  Company's  subsidiaries  included  Malaysian  Titanium
Corporation  Sdn. Bhd ("MT") and Fluid Minerals Espanola, S.A. ("FME").   MT,
located in Ipoh, Malaysia, manufactures synthetic rutile which is sold to the
Company  as a raw material for the manufacture of its principal product.   MT
is also a master distributor for HITOX pigment in the Asia/Pacific region, as
well  as  Europe.   MT has established a sales team which is responsible  for
managing the distributor relationships in individual countries in the region,
as well as directing the overall sales and marketing effort.  In 1999, MT and
the  Company  entered into a license agreement under which  MT  will  produce
HITOX  pigment  using the fluid energy milling process.  MT  began  producing
HITOX pigment in the third quarter of 1999.

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

   In  preparing  financial statements in conformity with generally  accepted
accounting   principles,  management  is  required  to  make  estimates   and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the  financial
statements  and  revenues and expenses during the reporting  period.   Actual
results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

   The  Company  considers all highly liquid investments readily  convertible
to known cash amounts and with a maturity of three months or less at the date
of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Inventories

   Inventories  are  stated  at  the lower of  cost  or  market;  cost  being
determined  principally by use of the average-cost method, which approximates
the first-in, first-out method.

Property, Plant and Equipment

   Property,  plant  and  equipment  are  stated  at  cost  less  accumulated
depreciation.   Depreciation  is  based on  the  estimated  useful  lives  of
depreciable  assets,  ranging from 3 to 35 years, and is  generally  provided
using the straight-line method.  Maintenance and repair costs are charged  to
expense as incurred.

<PAGE>                                 29

Assets Held for Sale

   The  Company  records  the value of assets held for sale  under  Financial
Accounting  Standards Board Statement No. 121, Accounting for the  Impairment
of  Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of.  Statement
121 requires that assets held for disposal be valued at the lower of carrying
amount or fair value less cost to sell.  Following the initial write-down  of
an  asset  to fair value less cost to sell, the Statement requires subsequent
revisions  to  the  carrying amount of the asset to be  disposed  of  if  the
estimate  of  fair  value less the cost to sell changes  during  the  holding
period.   In  addition, depreciation is not recorded during the period(s)  in
which  the  assets  are being held for disposal.  For further  discussion  on
assets held for sale and the impact of Statement 121, see Note 4 of Notes  to
the Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

   Sales  are  recognized when the product is shipped and customers  have  no
right  of  return.  The Company's pigment business has generally  experienced
higher  sales during the second and third calendar quarters, due to increased
activity  in  construction  and  maintenance  during  warm  weather  and  the
associated increase in demand for materials which use pigments such as paints
and  plastic  pipe.   The Company's principal product line,  HITOX  pigments,
accounted for 73.9% and 74.4% of total sales in 1999 and 1998, respectively.

Income Taxes

   The  Company  records  income taxes under Financial  Accounting  Standards
Board  Statement  No. 109, using the liability method.   Under  this  method,
deferred  tax  assets  and liabilities are determined  based  on  differences
between  financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and  are
measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse.

Stock Based Compensation

   The  Company  grants  stock  options for  a  fixed  number  of  shares  to
employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the
date  of  grant.   The  Company  has accounted for  stock  option  grants  in
accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and,  accordingly, recognized no compensation expense for  the  stock  option
grants.   The Company will continue to account for stock option grants  under
APB  Opinion  No. 25, while applying the requirements of FASB  Statement  No.
123,  Accounting  for  Stock Based Compensation.  See  Note  7  of  Notes  to
Financial Statements.

<PAGE>                                30

Earnings Per Share

   Basic  earnings  per  share  is based on the weighted  average  number  of
shares  outstanding  and excludes any dilutive effects of options,  warrants,
and  convertible securities.  Diluted earnings per share reflects the  effect
of all dilutive items.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

   In  June  1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued  Statement
No.  133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.   The
Statement  requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on  the  balance
sheet  at  fair value.  Derivatives that are not hedges must be  adjusted  to
fair  value through income.  If the derivative is a hedge, depending  on  the
nature  of  the  hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives  are  either
offset  against  the  change in fair value of assets,  liabilities,  or  firm
commitments  through  earnings or recognized in  other  comprehensive  income
until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.  The ineffective portion  of
a  derivative's  change  in  fair value will  be  immediately  recognized  in
earnings.   Because of the Company's minimal use of derivatives,  instruments
or  hedging activities, the adoption of Statement No. 133 on January 1,  1999
did  not  have a significant effect on earnings or the financial position  of
the company.

Cost of Computer Software

   In  March 1998, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the  AICPA
issued  Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for Costs of Computer Software
Developed For or Obtained for Internal use.  SOP 98-1 requires the Company to
expense  training costs incurred in connection with developing  or  obtaining
internal software.  The adoption of this SOP on January 1, 1999 did not  have
an effect on the net income or earnings per share for the twelve months ended
December 31, 1999.

2. INVENTORIES

   A summary of inventories follows:
                                                 December 31,
                                           --------------------------
                                              1999           1998
                                           -----------    -----------
Raw materials                              $ 5,229,330    $ 4,694,575
Work in progress                                92,044         72,627
Finished goods                               1,085,238        434,650
Supplies                                        83,228        102,498
                                           -----------    -----------
Total Inventories                          $ 6,489,840    $ 5,304,350
                                           ===========    ===========

   See Note 10 regarding purchase commitments for synthetic rutile.

<PAGE>                               31

3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

   Major  classifications and expected lives of property, plant and equipment
are summarized below:


                                                         December 31,
                                 Expected           -----------------------
                                   Life                1999         1998
                               ------------         ----------   ----------
Land and Office building         35 years           $   42,922   $   42,922
Production facilities          10, 20 years          3,943,342    3,383,687
Machinery and equipment         5, 7 years           4,182,094    4,103,420
Furniture and fixtures    3, 5, 7, 10, 20 years        738,170      666,289
                                                    ----------   ----------
Total                                                8,906,528    8,196,318
Less accumulated depreciation                       (6,196,660)  (5,693,570)
                                                    ----------   ----------
Property, Plant and Equipment, net                  $2,709,868   $2,502,748
                                                    ==========   ==========

   The  amounts of depreciation expense calculated on the Company's property,
plant  and equipment for the years ending December 31, 1999 and December  31,
1998 were $505,877, and $522,337, respectively.

4. ADJUSTMENT OF ASSETS FOR SALE TO FAIR VALUE

   The  Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.  121,
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived  Assets
to  be Disposed of, effective January 1, 1995.  This Statement addresses  the
accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and long-lived  assets  to
be  disposed of.  The Statement requires that the carrying amount  of  assets
held  for  sale be reduced to the fair value of the asset less  the  cost  to
sell.

   In  1998  the Company consolidated all of its Corpus Christi personnel  at
its  plant  location  and placed its former corporate  headquarters  building
located  in downtown Corpus Christi for sale.  The Company recorded a  charge
of  $90,600  in  the fourth quarter of 1997 to reduce the  building  to  fair
value.  An additional charge of $120,000 was recorded in the first quarter of
1998 based on an offer it accepted for purchase of the building.  The sale of
the  building was completed on March 1, 1999, for approximately its  carrying
value.

<PAGE>                                  32

5. LONG-TERM DEBT AND NOTES PAYABLE TO BANKS

   A summary of long-term debt follows:
                                                        December 31,
                                                   -----------------------
                                                      1999         1998
                                                   ---------     ---------
8.17% term note payable to a U.S. bank,
incorporated into the Loan
Due January 31, 2000, principal balance
prepaid January 15, 1999                           $      --     $ 389,249
                                                   ---------     ---------
Total                                                     --       389,249
Less current maturities                                   --       389,249
                                                   ---------     ---------
Total long-term debt                               $      --     $      --
                                                   =========     =========

   The  Company  has  a  loan agreement with Bank of America,  (the  "Bank"),
which provides the Company with a $2,000,000 line of credit.  The Company had
no  balance  outstanding  under the line of credit  during  1999.   The  loan
agreement  was renewed (the "Renewal") effective July 17, 1998.  The  Renewal
matures  on  April 30, 2000, with an interest rate of the Bank's prime  rate.
The  line  of  credit is secured by accounts receivable and  inventory.   The
Renewal  included one term loan, which had a balance of $389,249 at  December
31,  1998,  an interest rate of 8.17%, and monthly payments of $31,415.   The
term  loan  was  scheduled to mature on January 31,  2000,  but  was  prepaid
effective  January 15, 1999.  The Company is prohibited from paying dividends
without the prior approval of the Bank.

6. INCOME TAXES

   A  reconciliation between the Company's effective tax rate and the Federal
statutory rate on earnings is as follows:
                                                         December 31,
                                                   ----------------------
                                                      1999         1998
                                                   ---------    ---------
Expense computed at statutory rates                $ 342,717    $ 334,265
Other, net                                             7,790        4,986
Change in valuation allowance                      ( 333,507)   ( 326,251)
                                                   ---------    ---------
                                                   $  17,000    $  13,000
                                                   =========    =========

   Deferred  income  taxes  reflect the effects of (a) temporary  differences
between  the  carrying  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  for  financial
reporting  purposes  and the amounts used for income tax  purposes,  and  (b)

<PAGE>                               33

operating  loss and tax credit carryforwards.  The tax effects of significant
items comprising the Company's net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 1999
and 1998 are as follows:
                                                      December 31,
                                               ------------------------
                                                   1999          1998
                                                 Rounded       Rounded
                                               -----------   -----------
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
- ------------------------
Book - tax difference of U.S. property,
  plant & equipment                            $  136,400    $  156,300
                                               ----------    ----------
     Total deferred liabilities                   136,400       156,300
                                               ----------    ----------
Deferred Tax Assets:
- -------------------
Net operating loss carryforwards                3,430,300     3,743,600
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward        64,700        58,300
Other deferred assets                              38,200        84,900
                                               ----------    ----------
     Total deferred assets                      3,533,200     3,886,800
                                               ----------    ----------
Net deferred tax assets before
  valuation allowance                           3,396,800     3,730,500
                                               ----------    ----------
Valuation allowance                            (3,396,800)   (3,730,300)
                                               ----------    ----------
Net deferred tax liability                     $       --    $       --
                                               ==========    ==========

   As   of  December  31,  1999,  the  Company  has  a  net  operating   loss
carryforward of $10,100,000, which expires in 2009.

7. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Stock Options

   The  Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25,   Accounting  for  Stock  Issued  to  Employees  (APB  25)  and   related
interpretations  in  accounting for its employee stock  options  because,  as
discussed  below,  the alternative fair value accounting provided  for  under
FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, requires use
of  option  valuation  models  that were not developed  for  use  in  valuing
employee  stock  options.  Under APB 25, because the exercise  price  of  the
Company's  employee stock options equals the market price of  the  underlying
stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.

<PAGE>                               34

   The  Company's 1990 Incentive Plan for Hitox Corporation of  America  (the
"Plan")  provides  for  the  award  of a variety  of  incentive  compensation
arrangements  to  such  employees and directors as may  be  determined  by  a
Committee  of  the Board (the "Committee").  The original Plan provided  that
options or awards for as many as 175,000 shares of the Company's common stock
may be granted by the Committee.  In 1995, the Board of Directors approved an
amendment  to  the  Plan increasing the number of shares available  to  grant
thereunder  to  625,000.  The Plan also provides for the  automatic  granting
annually  of  options  for  2,500  shares of  common  stock  to  non-employee
directors  of the Company.  Options must be exercised within ten  years  from
the  date of grant or forfeited.  All options are issued at an exercise price
equal  to  the  stock's market value on the date of grant.   Options  may  be
issued  subject  to  a vesting schedule at the discretion  of  the  Board  of
Directors' Compensation Committee.

   In  addition, during 1991, 75,000 non-qualified stock options were granted
to  the officers of the Company at an exercise price of $9.75 per share which
expired  during  1998.   There  also were 3,000 non-qualified  stock  options
granted in 1989 at $9.00, which expired in 1996.  During 1995, another 50,000
options were issued outside the plan at an exercise price of $2.625.  In 1999
an  additional  75,000 options were issued outside the Plan  at  an  exercise
price of $2.125.

   Exercise  prices on options outstanding at December 31, 1999  ranged  from
$1.531 to $10.625 per share.  The weighted-average remaining contractual life
of  those  options  is  8.25  years.  The number of  options  exercisable  at
December   31,   1999  and  December  31,  1998  was  277,000  and   219,475,
respectively.   In  1998  the  Board  of  Directors  offered  employees   the
opportunity to have their existing options reissued at a lower price in order
to  restore  the  incentive  represented by the options.   The  options  were
reissued at the market price of $1.531 on March 3, 1998.  Most employees  who
chose to have their options reissued forfeited options which were immediately
exercisable in exchange for options subject to a multi-year vesting schedule.
Of  the  total  of 223,500 options shown granted in 1998 in the table  below,
196,400  were  forfeited by employees and then reissued  effective  March  3,
1998.

<PAGE>                                  35

   The following table summarizes certain information regarding stock
options granted:

                                                  Options
                                 ------------------------------------------
                                               Weighted
                                                Average
                        Total                  Exercise        Range of
                      Reserved   Outstanding     Price     Exercise Prices
                      --------   -----------  ----------  -----------------
Balances at
  December 31, 1997     675,000     426,275     $5.041     $1.750 - $10.625

      Granted                --     223,500     $1.567     $1.531 - $ 2.063
      Forfeited              --    (279,500)    $5.570     $1.531 - $ 9.750
                        -------     -------
Balances at
  December 31, 1998     675,000     370,275     $2.530     $1.531 - $10.625

      Granted            75,000     257,200     $2.264     $2.000 - $ 2.921
      Exercised              --     (15,700)    $1.531          $1.531
      Forfeited              --    (110,375)    $4.047     $1.531 - $10.625
                        -------     -------
Balances at
  December 31, 1999     750,000     501,400     $2.095     $1.531 - $10.625
                        =======     =======

   Pro  forma  information  regarding net income and earnings  per  share  is
required  by  Statement  123, which also requires  that  the  information  be
determined  as  if the Company has accounted for its employee  stock  options
granted  subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of  that
Statement.   The fair value for these options was estimated at  the  date  of
grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-
average  assumptions  for  1998 and 1999, respectively:   risk-free  interest
rates of 5.73% and 5.88%; a dividend yield of zero; volatility factors of the
expected market price of the Company's common stock of .576 and .596;  and  a
weighted-average expected life of the option of 5 years in 1998 and in  1999.
The weighted-average fair value of options granted during 1999 was $1.54.

   The  Black-Scholes  option  valuation  model  was  developed  for  use  in
estimating   the  fair  value  of  traded  options  which  have  no   vesting
restrictions  and  are  fully  transferable.  In addition,  option  valuation
models  require  the  input  of highly subjective assumptions  including  the
expected  stock price volatility and expected lives.  Because  the  Company's
employee  stock  options  have characteristics significantly  different  from
those  of  traded  options,  and  because changes  in  the  subjective  input
assumptions  can  materially affect the fair value estimate, in  management's
opinion,  the  existing models do not necessarily provide a  reliable  single
measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

<PAGE>                                  36

   For  purposes  of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value  of  the
options  is  amortized  to  expense over the options'  vesting  period.   The
Company's pro forma information follows:

                                           1999        1998
                                         ---------   ---------
         Pro forma net income            $ 802,481   $ 822,605
         Pro forma earnings per share
         Basic                           $    0.17   $    0.18
         Diluted                         $    0.17   $    0.18

Stock Warrants

   During  the  year,  warrants to purchase 100,000 shares  of  common  stock
expired.   In addition, the Company issued 100,000 shares of it common  stock
in  exchange  for the 1,111,111 outstanding warrants which were scheduled  to
expire on June 15, 2000.  The shares issued included 88,240 shares which were
held in Treasury.

   In  connection with all of the Company's stock options, 750,000 shares  of
the Company's common stock have been reserved.

8. PROFIT SHARING PLAN

   The  Company  has  a  profit  sharing  plan  that  covers  all  employees.
Contributions  to the plan are determined by the Board of Directors  and  are
limited  to  the maximum amount deductible by the Company for Federal  income
tax  purposes.  For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company contributed
$51,356  to  the profit sharing plan and $51,183 for the year ended  December
31, 1998.

   The  Company  also  offers  a  401(k)  savings  plan  administered  by  an
investment  services company.  Employees are eligible to participate  in  the
plan  after  completing six months of service with the Company.  The  Company
matches  contributions up to 2% of the employee's eligible earnings  or  $400
per  year, which ever is greater.  Total Company contributions to the  401(k)
plan for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 were $32,354 and $14,795,
respectively.

<PAGE>                               37

9. CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

   The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share:
                                                        1999         1998
                                                      ---------    ---------
NUMERATOR:

     Net Income                                       $ 990,992    $ 970,133

     Numerator for basic earnings per share  -
       income available to common stockholders          990,992      970,133
                                                      ---------    ---------
     Effect of dilutive securities                           --           --
                                                      ---------    ---------
     Numerator for diluted earnings per share -
       income available to common stockholders
       after assumed conversions                      $ 990,992    $ 970,133
                                                      =========    =========
DENOMINATOR:
     Denominator for basic earnings per share  -
       weighted-average shares                        4,718,093    4,657,487

     Effect of dilutive securities
       Employee stock options                            46,909       30,887
                                                      ---------    ---------

Dilutive potential common shares                         46,909       30,887
                                                      ---------    ---------
     Denominator for diluted earnings per share  -
       adjusted weighted-average shares
       and assumed conversions                        4,765,002    4,688,374
                                                      =========    =========
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

     Basic                                            $    0.21    $    0.21
                                                      =========    =========
     Diluted                                          $    0.21    $    0.21
                                                      =========    =========

   Excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share were  a  total
of  317,200 options and warrants in 1999 and 1,360,486 in 1998.  The  options
and  warrants  were not included in the computation of diluted  earnings  per
share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of
the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.

<PAGE>                               38

10.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Purchase Commitments

   The   Company  sold  its  entire  ownership  interest  in  its   Malaysian
subsidiary in 1994.  As part of that transaction, the Company entered into an
agreement  for  the  supply of synthetic rutile by MT  to  the  Company  (the
"Supply  Agreement") which became effective December 15,  1994.   The  Supply
Agreement  expired  in December of 1999. The fifth year  purchase  commitment
will be completed with the first shipment in 2000, as mutually agreed between
the  Company  and  MT,  thereby satisfying the 1999 purchase  requirement  of
$4,257,330.  The Company's 1998 purchases from MT totaled $4,310,773.

   The  second  negotiated  price  adjustment  under  the  Supply  Agreement,
effective  for  orders placed in 1998, resulted in a price decrease  compared
with  orders  placed  in  1997  due to favorable  exchange  rates  and  other
adjustments.   For  orders  placed in 1999, the  final  year  of  the  Supply
Agreement, the Company negotiated an additional price decrease.

   A  new five-year supply contract (the "New Supply Agreement") was executed
with  the  existing supplier on September 28, 1999, and became  effective  on
December  16,  1999  and continues with the pricing formula  used  under  the
original  contract.  The New Supply Agreement has a take or  pay  arrangement
but  reduces  the  quantity of material the Company is required  to  purchase
compared with the agreement that expired.

   Should  quantities  of  synthetic rutile above  the  minimum  quantity  be
required, the Company may seek alternative sources and price quotes.  MT will
have  the  right  to supply the additional requirement on a meet  or  release
basis.  The Supply Agreement provides for the payment of damages in the event
that  MT is not able to supply the minimum quantity of synthetic rutile,  and
likewise,  in  the event that the Company does not take the minimum  quantity
and MT cannot sell the shortfall of synthetic rutile on the open market at  a
comparable price.

Leases

   The  Company  operates a plant in Corpus Christi, Texas.  The facility  is
located  in  the  Rincon Industrial Park on approximately 13  acres  of  land
leased  under non-cancelable operating leases from the Port of Corpus Christi
Authority (the "Port").  The first lease, which covers 10 acres of the  plant
site, has a term of 30 years and expires in July 2017.  The lease payment  is
subject to adjustment every 5 years for what the Port calls the "equalization
valuation".   This is used as a means of equalizing rentals on  various  Port
lands  and  is determined solely at the discretion of the Port.   The  second
lease  with  the Port, which covers 2.86 acres, was renewed for its  final  5
year option term effective January 1, 1998.  The Company has an agreement  in
principal  with the Port to amend the current leases so that they  expire  no
earlier than the year 2027.  As part of the agreement, the Company intends to

<PAGE>                                  39

sell  the parcel of land that it owns to the Port and enter into a new  lease
for that property that expires in the same year as the existing leases.

   Minimum future rental payments under these leases as of December 31,  1999
are as follows:

   Years Ending December 31,
   ------------------------
          2000                                $  53,400
          2001                                   53,400
          2002                                   53,400
          2003                                   24,000
          2004                                   24,000
          Later years                           300,000
                                              ---------
          Total minimum lease payments        $ 508,200
                                              =========

   Rent  expense  under  these leases was $53,400 per year  during  1999  and
1998.  It is expected that as these leases expire, the Company will renew  or
replace them with leases on similar assets, at potentially higher rates.

Contingencies

   The  Company believes that the Corpus Christi plant is in compliance  with
all  applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the
discharge of substances into the environment, and it does not expect that any
material  capital expenditures for environmental control facilities  will  be
necessary in order to continue such compliance.

11.  PRINCIPAL CUSTOMER INFORMATION AND EXPORT SALES

   One  customer  provided 18.6% and 16% of total revenue  during  the  years
ended  December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.  No other customer  provided
10% or more of total revenue during those years.

   Revenues from export sales were as follows:

                                      Years Ended December 31,
                                    ----------------------------
       Geographic Region                 1999            1998
       -----------------            ------------    ------------
       Canada and Mexico            $  1,328,573    $  1,186,335
       South and Central America          86,540           1,575
       Asia- Australia                   180,796          78,690
       Africa-Middle East                 31,195         172,356
       Europe                                 --          28,481
                                    ------------    ------------
       Total                        $  1,627,104    $  1,467,437
                                    ============    ============

<PAGE>                                 40

   The  Company  sells  its  products  both  directly  to  end-users  and  to
distributors.   The top 10 direct customers accounted for 42%  of  total  net
sales  in  1999  and  39%  in  1998.   Domestic  distributors  accounted  for
approximately 28% of total net sales in 1999 and 30% in 1998.

12.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

   On  January  3,  2000,  the Company signed a Memorandum  of  Understanding
(Letter  of  Intent) with Megamin Ventures Sdn. Bhd. to acquire a controlling
interest  (up  to  100% of the shares) in the Malaysian Titanium  Corporation
("MT"),  subject  to  completion  of  a satisfactory  due  diligence  review,
negotiation  and execution of a definitive acquisition agreement between  the
parties,  receipt  of  regulatory approvals and  receipt  of  an  appropriate
fairness opinion.  The parties are continuing efforts towards negotiating the
terms of a definitive acquisition agreement.

   MT  is  the Company's sole supplier of Synthetic Rutile, the raw  material
for the Company's proprietary titanium pigment HITOXr.  MTC is also producing
and selling HITOX pigment in Asia under a license from the Company.

   MT  was  previously  a subsidiary of Hitox Corporation  and  was  sold  to
Megamin  Ventures  Sdn  Bhd  and other investors in  1994.   The  acquisition
provides the opportunity to control the raw material supply for the Company's
primary  product,  HITOX pigment, and represents both a low  cost  production
site for HITOX pigment and marketing opportunities outside the U.S. market.

<PAGE>                               41

                              INDEX TO EXHIBITS



 Exhibit No.                         Item                          Page
 -----------                         ----                          ----

     23        Consent of Ernst & Young LLP                         43

     24        New Supply Agreement with Malaysian Titanium         44
               Corporation Sdn. Bhd. Dated September 28, 1999

     27        Financial Data Schedule                              59

<PAGE>                               42

                                 EXHIBIT 23



                        CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.  33-39755) pertaining to the 1990 Incentive  Plan  for  Hitox
Corporation of America of our report dated February 18, 2000, with respect to
the financial statements of Hitox Corporation of America included in the Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.


ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Antonio, Texas
February 25, 2000

<PAGE>                                  43

                              SUPPLY AGREEMENT


THIS AGREEMENT is made the 28th day of September, 1999.

                                   Between

HITOX  CORPORATION  OF  AMERICA, a company incorporated  under  the  laws  of
Delaware,  United States of America and having its business  address  at  722
Burleson  Street,  Corpus  Christi, Texas 78402,  United  States  of  America
(hereinafter called the "Purchaser") of the one part;

                                     And

MALAYSIAN  TITANTIUM CORPORATION SDN BHD, a company incorporated in  Malaysia
and  having its business address at 4-1/2Mile Jalan Lahat, 30200 Ipoh in  the
State of Perak, Malaysia (hereinafter called the "Seller") of the other part.

WHEREAS

(1) The   Seller  is  in  the  business  of  manufacturing  synthetic  rutile
     (hereinafter referred to as the "Product") at its plant located at 4-1/2
     Mile  Jalan Lahat, 30200 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia (hereinafter referred  to
     as the "Plant").

(2)  The  Purchaser is in the business of manufacturing, inter alia,  a  buff
     colored  titanium  dioxide pigment called HITOX (Registered  trademark),
     and requires the Product in its manufacturing process.

(3)  The  Purchaser desires to purchase the Product from the Seller  and  the
     Seller  has  agreed to sell the same subject to and upon the  terms  and
     conditions hereinafter appearing.

NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:

1.  CONSIDERATION

In  consideration of the sum of One United States Dollar (USD1.00)  only  now
paid  by  the  Seller  to the Purchaser (the receipt of which  the  Purchaser
hereby  acknowledges)  the Seller hereby agrees to  sell  and  the  Purchaser
hereby  agrees to purchase from the Seller, the Product subject to  and  upon
the  terms  and  conditions set out herein for a period  of  five  (5)  years
(hereinafter referred to as the "Principal Period") commencing from  December
16,  1999,  and  thereafter from year to yar unless terminated in  accordance
with  Clause  14 hereof.  The Purchaser or Seller may terminate  this  Supply
Agreement  at  any  time during the Term of the Agreement  with  twelve  (12)
months' written notice.

<PAGE>                                 44

2.  PURCHASER'S COVENANT TO BUY

During  the  subsistence of this Agreement, the Purchaser shall purchase  the
Product  exclusively from the Seller for the term of this Agreement  provided
always  that  the Purchaser shall be entitled to purchase test quantities  of
synthetic  rutile from third parties for sampling and testing purposes.   The
Purchaser agrees to share with the Seller pertinent information learned  from
such purchases so long as it does not breach any confidentiality agreements.

3.  SPECIFICATIONS

The  Product shall be manufactured in accordance with the specifications  set
by  the Purchaser, details of which are set out in the First Schedule hereto.
Product to be pre-approved by Purchaser before shipment.

4.  QUANTITIES

4.1  The Purchaser guarantees that it shall purchase the minimum quantity  of
     6,000  MT  per  annum from the Seller during Principal  Period  of  this
     Agreement  (hereinafter the minimum amount required to be  purchased  by
     the  Purchaser  under  this  Agreement  shall  be  referred  to  as  the
     "Purchaser's minimum annual quantity").

4.2  During the subsistence of this Agreement, the Seller guarantees that  it
     shall  have  available for sale to the Purchaser a minimum  quantity  of
     12,000  MT  per annum (hereinafter referred to as the "Seller's  minimum
     annual  quantity") commencing from the date of this Agreement and  shall
     not be required to supply more than the Seller's minimum annual quantity
     unless  the  Seller  at  its sole and absolute  discretion  opts  to  do
     otherwise.

The parties hereto agree that the Purchaser's minimum quantity of the Product
referred  to  in Clause 4.1 hereof shall be in the approximate proportion  of
90%  "Standard" grade and 10% "Ultralight" grade.  The Purchaser  may  change
the  proportion of the "Standard" versus "Ultralight" grades by giving notice
in sufficient time to the Seller to enable the Seller to produce the required
quantities  provided  that such change in the proportion  shall  be  mutually
agreed upon.

In  the  event that that the Purchaser shall wish to purchase a  quantity  in
excess  of  the Purchaser's minimum annual quantity during the term  of  this
Agreement, the Purchaser shall purchase the excess amount from the Seller  at
prices  to  be  mutually  agreed upon provided that  the  obligation  of  the
Purchaser to purchase from the Seller any amount in excess of the Purchaser's
minimum annual quantity shall be on a "meet or release" basis, that is to say
if  the  Purchaser is able to obtain an offer from a third party to  purchase
synthetic  rutile similar in quality (in terms of the Purchaser's ability  to
use  the  alternative synthetic rutile in place of the Product) in quantities
at  least equal to the amount required by the Purchaser at a price lower than
that  offered  by the Seller and otherwise on terms not less  favorable  than

<PAGE>                                  45

those  of  the Seller hereunder, and if the Purchaser notifies the Seller  of
its  interest  in such offer and produces satisfactory evidence thereof,  the
Seller  shall  meet such lower price or will release the Purchaser  from  its
obligations  to purchase the Product exclusively from the Seller  during  the
term of the offer.

5.  SUPPLY PRICE

5.1  The  supply  price of the Product on f.o.b. (Incoterms  1994)  Malaysian
     port  basis  in  this Agreement shall be determined annually  using  the
     formula  set  out  in  the Second Schedule hereto.   The  Seller  hereby
     undertakes  to  give the Purchaser a minimum of four (4) weeks'  written
     notification  of any revised supply price before implementation  of  the
     same.

5.2  In  the  event that the Purchaser shall require quantities in excess  of
     the  Purchaser's minimum quantity of the Product referred to  in  Clause
     4.1  in  this Agreement, the Purchaser shall give the Seller  eight  (8)
     weeks  notice  of its requirements for such excess amount provided  that
     the supply price shall be determined in the following manner:

5.2.1  During  the  Principal Period, the supply price for  the  said  excess
       amount  of  the Product shall be separately negotiated and  agreed  to
       between the parties hereto provided that such supply price agreed upon
       shall apply only in respect of the said excess amount; and

5.2.2  For the years subsequent to the Principal Period, the supply price for
       the  entire quantity of the Product shall be negotiated and agreed  to
       between the parties hereto.

6.  DELIVERY/INSPECTION PRIOR TO SHIPMENT

6.1  The  Purchaser shall forward to the Seller every Year a forecast  master
     schedule  with  the preestimates of the supply of the  Product  required
     from  the  Seller for the year which schedule shall be  updated  by  the
     Purchaser  from  time  to time.  To ensure to the extent  feasible  that
     delivery  of  the Product shall result in an even flow of deliveries  of
     the  Product  consistent  with the Seller's  production  schedules,  the
     Purchaser  shall  confirm on or before the tenth  (10th)  day  bimonthly
     (once  every two months) and shall furnish written shipping instructions
     for  the  quantity required during the next succeeding  months  provided
     always  that  the  Purchaser shall not order more  than  2,500  MT  each
     bimonthly  period unless otherwise agreed to between the  parties.   The
     parties hereto agree that shipments of the Product shall be in bulk  and
     the  Purchaser need not take delivery of the Product bimonthly  provided
     that  where the Purchaser has confirmed the amount required but has  not
     taken  delivery, any storage costs incurred by the Seller shall be borne
     by  the Purchaser.  It is hereby agreed between the parties that if  the
     Purchaser  fails  to take any such bimonthly amount its  total  purchase
     obligation  shall not be reduced unless the Seller elects to cancel  the

<PAGE>                                  46

     quantity  not  taken.  Upon agreement by Purchaser and  Seller,  a  bulk
     shipment  of about 3,000 MT to 5,000 MT in the "hold" of a ship  may  be
     scheduled from time to time.

6.2  Prior to issuing the Quality Certificates in respect of each consignment
     of  the Product to be shipped to the Purchaser, the Seller shall courier
     to  the  Purchaser  or  the Purchaser's representative  samples  of  the
     Product to enable the Purchaser to test and confirm that the Product  is
     in  order  prior to shipment but in no case shall the samples  be  later
     than  fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduled date of shipment.  Prior
     to the scheduled date of shipment, the Purchaser shall inform the Seller
     of  the results or as soon as possible after the receipt of the samples,
     in any case, no later than seven (7) days after receipt.  If the Product
     does not meet Purchaser's specifications, then Seller shall not ship the
     Product  but  shall  properly  remedy the Product  to  meet  Purchaser's
     required specifications at Seller's expense.

6.3  The Seller  shall  issue  the  Quality Certificates  for  each  shipment
     confirming that the Product is in accordance with the Specifications  as
     set out in First Schedule.

7.  FAILURE TO PURCHASE GUARANTEED QUANTITIES

7.1  In the event that the Purchaser's offtake shall fail to meet the minimum
     quantity  as stated in Clause 3.1 hereof, the Purchaser shall be  liable
     to  pay  as agreed liquidated damages to the Seller, and the quantum  of
     damages shall be calculated as follows:

7.1.1  in  the  event that the Seller is forced to sell the quantity  of  the
       shortfall  of the Purchaser's minimum quantity to a third party  at  a
       lower price than the supply price as setforth under the provisions  of
       Clause 5 hereof (having made all reasonable attempts to sell the  same
       at  a  higher  price), the measure of damages shall be the  difference
       between  the supply price specified in Clause 5 and the sale price  to
       the third party multiplied by the quantity of the shortfall (or a part
       thereof) sold to the third party;

7.1.2  in  the  event  that the Seller is unable, having made all  reasonable
       attempts  to do so, to sell the quantity of the shortfall (or  a  part
       thereof) to a third party, the measure of damages shall be the  supply
       price  (as  determined  under  the  provisions  of  Clause  5  hereof)
       multiplied by the quantity of the shortfall.

8.  FAILURE TO SUPPLY GUARANTEED QUANTITIES

8.1. In the event that the Seller fails to supply the minimum quantity of the
     Products for which the supply price has been agreed to, the Seller shall
     be  liable to pay as agreed liquidated damages to the Purchaser and  the
     quantum of damages shall be calculated as follows:

<PAGE>                               47

8.1.1  in  the event that the Purchaser is forced to purchase the quantity of
       the  shortfall of the quantity required by the Purchaser from a  third
       party at a higher price than the supply price as determined under  the
       provisions  of this Agreement (having made all reasonable attempts  to
       purchase  at a favorable price), the measure of damages shall  be  the
       difference multiplied by the shortfall plus the difference between the
       normal charges associated with shipment from the Seller and the actual
       freight charges incurred by the Purchaser (if any).

8.1.2  in  the event that the Purchaser is unable, having made all reasonable
       attempts  to  do so, to purchase the quantity of the shortfall  (or  a
       part thereof) from a third party, the measure of damages shall be  the
       difference  between  the  supply  price  (as  determined   under   the
       provisions  of this Agreement) plus freight charges to the Purchaser's
       premises  and the average price of comparable unit of the  Purchaser's
       HITOX  pigment  calculated for the 30-day period  just  prior  to  the
       default multiplied by the quantity of the shortfall.

9.   PAYMENT

     Unless  otherwise  agreed between the parties hereto, payment  for  each
     consignment  of  the Product supplied hereunder shall be  made  by  wire
     transfer  sixty  (60) days after the bill of lading date.   All  amounts
     payable by the Purchaser to the Seller shall be in the currency  of  the
     United States of America.

10.  SELLER NOT LIABLE FOR LOSSES/SPECIFICATIONS

10.1 Save  that the Product shall conform with the specifications set out  in
     the   First   Schedule  hereto  the  Seller  makes  no   warranties   or
     representations that the Product shall be merchantable or  suitable  for
     any  particular  purpose  or  for  use  under  any  specific  conditions
     notwithstanding  that such purpose or condition may  be  known  or  made
     known to the Seller.

10.2 Subject  to Clause 10.1, the Seller shall not be liable for any loss  or
     damage  of  any  kind  whatsoever (including but  without  limiting  the
     generality  of the foregoing all incidental and consequential  loss  and
     damage)  however caused inter alia directly or indirectly by or  arising
     wholly or partly out of or in connection with:

10.2.1 unsuitability for any purpose of the Product; and/or

10.2.2 any claim or demand by any third party at any time out of or otherwise
       in  connection  with the manufacture supply or use of the  Product  or
       things in which the Product is a component of part.

<PAGE>                                48

11.  WEIGHT READING

     With  each shipment or vessel loading, the Seller shall contract with  a
     reputable independent surveyor to view the loading of the Product and to
     provide a cargo and draft survey that will be deemed conclusive evidence
     of the quantity of the cargo.

12.  CORPORATE GUARANTEE

     The  Seller  shall procure such parties acceptable to the Purchaser,  to
     issue  a  corporate/personal  guarantee to  the  Purchaser  guaranteeing
     continuous  supply of the contracted quantities of the  Product  by  the
     Seller  in form acceptable to both parties.  The Seller undertakes  that
     any  successors in title and any subsequent major shareholder(s) of  the
     Seller shall provide a similar guarantee to the Purchaser.

13.  FORCE MAJEURE

13.1 Neither  party hereto shall have any right of action whatsoever  against
     the  other in respect of any loss whatsoever occurring to such party  by
     reason  of any non-performance under this Agreement occasioned by  major
     plant  breakdowns  or delays in transit or delays caused  by  accidents,
     strikes  or  force majeure.  For the purposes of this  clause,  a  force
     majeure  event  includes  (without  limiting  the  generality   of   the
     foregoing),   inter   alia,  enemy  action,  riots,  civil   commotions,
     accidents,  fire,  major  plant breakdowns, interferences  by  labor  or
     strikes  or  lockout  of  employees, Acts of God  or  any  restrictions,
     regulations,  orders, acts or omissions or operations by  any  local  or
     municipal  authority or government department or any causes  beyond  the
     control of the party concerned.

13.2 If  at  any  time during the continuance of this Agreement either  party
     shall be hindered or prevented from performing its obligations hereunder
     by  the  occurrence  of  an event set out in Clause  13.1  hereof,  this
     Agreement  shall  be  suspended during the period  the  aforesaid  event
     continues  to  operate and such party shall not be liable to  the  other
     party for any loss or damage whatsoever suffered by that party by virtue
     of  the delay or failure to perform its obligations hereunder.  Upon the
     aforesaid event ceasing to operate, performance of this Agreement  shall
     resume.

13.3 The parties hereto hereby agree that in the event that any change in the
     statutory  law,  by-law,  rule or regulation  (hereinafter  collectively
     referred to as the "laws") of the state or country where a party resides
     in  affects the party (hereinafter referred to as the "affected  party")
     in such a way that the Agreement cannot be carried on without infringing
     or  breaching the laws, the other party shall be given reasonable period
     of time to try and accommodate the change in the law in such a way as to
     enable  the Agreement to be carried on without the affected party  being
     in  breach of the laws.  What constitutes a "reasonable period of  time"

<PAGE>                                 49

     shall be as determined by the parties but shall not in any event be less
     than  sixty  (60)  days  provided always that this  Agreement  shall  be
     suspended during this said period of time.  In the event that the  other
     party  cannot,  after  the said period of time  given,  accommodate  the
     change  in the laws then any monies owing by either party shall be  paid
     forthwith to the other and thereafter this Agreement shall terminate and
     be null and void and of no legal effect and neither party shall have any
     claim whatsoever against the other in connection with or arising out  of
     this Agreement save for any antecedent breaches thereof.

14.  TERMINATION/LIQUIDATED DAMAGES

14.1 Without  prejudice to any other remedies which either party  hereto  may
     have against the other, either party hereto shall have the right at  any
     time to terminate this Agreement forthwith if the other party commits  a
     material breach of any of the terms of this Agreement, and, in the  case
     of  a material breach capable of remedy, fails to remedy the same within
     fourteen  (14)  days  after  receipt of a  written  notice  giving  full
     particulars of the material breach and requiring it to be remedied.  For
     the  purposes of this Clause 14.1, a material breach shall be considered
     capable  of  being remedied if the party in breach can comply  with  the
     provision  in  questions in all respects other than as to  the  time  of
     performance (provided that time of performance is not of the essence).

14.2 Upon  the  expiry  of  the  Principal Period  of  this  Agreement,  this
     Agreement  shall  automatically  be  renewed  each  year  provided  that
     notwithstanding  there  has been no breach or default  by  either  party
     hereto of its obligations under this Agreement, either party hereto  may
     terminate  this Agreement without having to give any reason therefor  by
     giving  twelve (12) months prior notice in writing to the other  of  its
     intention to terminate this Agreement.  Upon expiry of such twelve-month
     period,  this Agreement shall be terminated and be null and void  of  no
     legal  effect  and neither party hereto shall have any claim  whatsoever
     against  the  other in connection with or arising out of this  Agreement
     save for any antecedent breaches thereof.

14.3 In  the  event that a party (hereinafter referred to as the  "defaulting
     party")  shall commit a breach of any of the terms of this Agreement  at
     any  time  during the Principal Period of this Agreement and  the  other
     party  (hereinafter referred to as the "non-defaulting party") exercises
     its  right  of termination of this Agreement in accordance  with  Clause
     14.1 hereof, the defaulting party will:

14.3.1 (if  the non-defaulting party is the Seller) be at liberty to sell the
        Product in any such way as it deems fit to such person or persons  as
        it  shall  think fit without being liable to account to the Purchaser
        for any profit made on such sale;

<PAGE>                               50

14.3.2 (if  the  non-defaulting  party is the Purchaser)  be  at  liberty  to
        purchase  synthetic  rutile from any party as it  deems  fit  without
        being liable to account to the Seller in any way whatsoever.

15.  TIME

     Time wherever mentioned herein is of the essence of this Agreement.

16.  ARBITRATION

16.1 Any  dispute,  difference  or  question which  may  arise  at  any  time
     hereafter touching the true construction of this Agreement or the rights
     and  liabilities  of  the parties hereto shall unless  otherwise  herein
     expressly  provided be settled by the parties hereto  amicably,  failing
     which  all questions or differences whatsoever must be referred  by  the
     parties  to  be  determined by arbitration under  the  UNCITRAL  (United
     Nations  Commission  on International Trade Law)  Arbitration  Rules  as
     interpreted by the Kuala Lumpur Regional Arbitration Centre by a  single
     arbitrator  mutually appointed by the parties hereto in accordance  with
     the  said  rules.  The arbitration is to be conducted in  Malaysia.   An
     award  given by the arbitrator is final and binding, and judgment on  it
     may  be  entered  in any court having jurisdiction in  relation  to  the
     subject matter of the arbitration.  The costs and expenses in appointing
     the arbitrator shall be jointly borne by the parties.

16.2 Any  notice of proceedings or other notices in connection with or  which
     would  give effect to any such proceedings may without prejudice to  any
     other method of service be served on any party in accordance with Clause
     21.

17.  INDULGENCE

     No  relaxation forbearance delay or indulgence by either party hereto in
     enforcing  any  of  the terms and conditions of this  Agreement  or  the
     granting of time by either party to the other shall prejudice affect  or
     restrict  the  rights and powers either party hereunder  nor  shall  any
     waiver  by either party of any breach hereof operate as a waiver of  any
     subsequent or any continuing breach hereof.

18.  KNOWLEDGE OR ACQUIESCENCE

     Knowledge or acquiescence by either party of or in any breach of any  of
     the conditions or covenants herein contained shall not operate as or  be
     deemed  to be waiver of such conditions or covenants or any of them  and
     notwithstanding  such  knowledge or acquiescence  each  party  shall  be
     entitled to exercise its respective rights under this Agreement  and  to
     require  strict  performance by the other of the  terms  and  conditions
     herein.

<PAGE>                                 51

19.  NO ASSIGNMENT

19.1 Neither  party to this Agreement shall assign or purport to assign  this
     Agreement  or any of its rights under this Agreement without  the  prior
     written consent of the other party.

19.2 In the event that one party consents to the assignment of this Agreement
     by  the  other  party  the  terms, provisions, covenants,  undertakings,
     agreements,  obligations  and conditions  of  this  Agreement  shall  be
     binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the assignee of the other
     party  as  if  the  assignee was an original party  to  this  Agreement.
     Notwithstanding such assignment, the other party shall  continue  to  be
     bound  by  the  terms  and  conditions of  this  Agreement  jointly  and
     severally with the assignee.

20.  GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION

     This  Agreement takes effect, is governed by and shall be construed,  in
     accordance wit the laws from time to time in force in Malaysia  and  the
     parties  hereto expressly agree that the courts of Malaysia  shall  have
     sole jurisdiction in respect thereof.

21.  NOTICES

21.1 All  notices  hereunder  shall be in writing and  be  given  by  express
     courier service, or facsimile to be served addressed as follows:

            SELLER:     Malaysian Titanium Corporation Sdn Bhd
                        4-1/2 Miles, Jalan Lahat
                        30200 Ipoh, Perak Darul Ridzuan
                Fax     (605) 322-2535

            PURCHASER:  Hitox Corporation of America
                        722 Burleson Street
                        P. O. Box 2544
                        Corpus Christi, TX 78403 USA
                        Attn:  President
                Fax     (361) 888-8279

        Such  notices  so addressed to the recipient shall be  deemed  to  be
        received.

21.1.1  in  the  case  of  express courier service, five (5) days  after  the
        notice  has  been  sent regardless of whether the  same  is  actually
        received or not; and

21.1.2  in the case of facsimile, at the time of transmission provided that a
        confirmation  copy thereof is sent by express courier within  twenty-
        four (24) hours of the transmission.

<PAGE>                               52

22.  SCHEDULES

     The  Schedules hereto shall be taken, read and construed as an essential
     part of this Agreement.

23.  HEADINGS

     The  captions  an  headings to the Clauses of  this  Agreement  are  for
     reference  only and do not affect the interpretation and/or  enforcement
     of the provisions of this Agreement.

24.  GOOD FAITH

     In  entering  this Agreement, the parties hereto recognize  that  it  is
     impracticable to make provision for every contingency that may arise  in
     the  course  of  performance thereof.  Accordingly  the  parties  hereto
     hereby  declare  it  to  be their intention that  this  Agreement  shall
     operate  between them with fairness and if in the course of  performance
     of  this Agreement, there are any disagreements or disputes arising from
     situations  which were not anticipated by either parties, then  ten  the
     parties hereto shall use their best endeavours to agree upon such course
     of  action  as may be necessary and equitable to both parties to  settle
     the disputes or disagreements.

25.  INTERPRETATION

25.1 Wherever  used  in  this  Agreement unless the context  shall  otherwise
     require, the following expressions shall have the following meanings:

25.1.1  the  "Seller" includes its successors-in-title and permitted  assigns
        and  when  there are two or more persons included in  the  term  "the
        Seller"  their liabilities under this Agreement shall  be  joint  and
        several;

25.1.2  "Year"  means  the  period of twelve months from  the  date  of  this
        Agreement  and  each consecutive period of twelve  months  thereafter
        during the period of this Agreement;

25.1.3  the   "Purchaser"  includes  its  successors-in-title  and  permitted
        assigns  and when there are two or more persons included in the  term
        "the Purchaser" their liabilities under this Agreement shall be joint
        and several;

25.1.4  words  importing the masculine gender shall be deemed  and  taken  to
        include the feminine and neuter genders and vice versa;

25.1.5  words importing the singular number only include the plural and  vice
        versa; and

25.1.6  words importing persons include corporations.

<PAGE>                               53

26.  AGREEMENT BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS-IN-TITLE

     This  Agreement  shall  be  binding  upon  the  successors-in-title  and
     permitted assigns of the parties hereto.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set their hands.


For and on behalf of the Purchaser the said
HITOX CORPORATION OF AMERICA

                                                BERNARD A. PAULSON
                                         ------------------------------
                              Signed By:        Bernard A. Paulson


For and on behalf of the Seller the said
MALAYSIAN TITANIUM CORPORATION SDN BHD

                                                    LEE HEE CHEW
                                         ------------------------------
                              Signed By:            Lee Hee Chew

<PAGE>                                54

                              FIRST SCHEDULE

                         Specification of Product

Synthetic Rutile, Rutile Crystal Structure, Specific Gravity 4.1

Ti02 content      Min.     94.50%  Sulfur content      Max.     900 ppm
Fe203             Max.      2.00   Chloride            Max.     260 ppm
Si02              Max.      1.50   Phosphorus          Max.     0.10%
A1203             Max.      0.50   Uranium             Max.      90 ppm
Cr203             Max.      0.10   Thorium             Max.     150 ppm
V205              Max.      0.20
Nb205             Max.      0.70
Mg0               Max.      0.10
Ca0               Max.      0.10
Mn0               Max.      0.10
Zr02              Max.      0.20
Sn02              Max.      0.10
As203             Max.    260 ppm


No Black float when slurried with water, by Test Method JT-36.
No natural Rutile to be added to ilmenite feedstock.
Magnetic particles - Max. 0.03% by hand magnet, by Test Method JT-35
pH - 6.0 - 7.0
Moisture - Max. 0.5%
Conductivity - Max. 200 micromhoes (siemens)
Free from foreign contaminants


Ti02 Analysis is by ASTM D1394
Screen Analysis

U.S. Standard Sieve, range %
  +35 Mesh         0 - 4
     +45           4 - 12
     +70           55-72
    +100           15-28
    +140           1 - 7
    +200           0 - 2
    -200            0.1


Grindability
            Standard SR - Min. equal to MTC-23 by Test Method JOET-34.
            Ultralight SR - Min. equal to MTC-23 by Test Method JOET-34.

<PAGE>                                55

Color:  Aqueous ball mill color evaluation.

In  order to evaluate the color of the synthetic rutile, MTC will  use  the
following synthetic rutile granule, ball mill color evaluation method:

      Formula A:
                     Grind Paste                         grams
                     -----------                         -----
                     Water                             2793.00
                     Triton X-100                        26.60
                     Tamol 731                          129.01
                     Colloid 681-F                       13.30
                     Dowcil 75                           13.30
                     ER 4400                             53.20
                     KTPP                                 6.65
                                                       -------
                                                       3035.06

(121  grams of grind is weighed into lacquer lined cans and set  aside  for
testing).

      Formula B:
                     Let Down                            grams
                     --------                            -----
                     Water                               89.99
                     Ammonia 26%                          5.99
                     Propylene Glycol                   461.36
                     Texanol                            107.85
                     Colloid 681-F                       11.98
                     Ac 507-46%                        2828.09
                                                       -------
                                                       3505.15

(105 grams of let down is weighed into lacquer lined cans and set aside for
testing)


Procedure:  Ball Milling of Synthetic Rutile

1.  Weigh 200 grams of Synthetic Rutile under analysis into a pre-prepared
    pint can containing 121 grams of "grind paste" (Formula A).

2.  Pour solution of Synthetic Rutile and grind paste into a 1.8 Liter Ball
    Mill and secure the ball mill lid.

3.  Place the ball mill on a ring roller and grind solution for 24 hours.

<PAGE>                                 56

4.  After the 24 hours have elapsed, remove the ball mill and pour 75.0 g
    of the milled solution into a pre-prepared 1/2 pint can containing 105.0
    grams of Let Down (Formula B).

5.  Stir for 5 minutes at low speed using a laboratory mixer to uniform
    consistency.

6.  Make a drawdown of the paint on an opacity chart using a 10 mil
    drawdown blade.

7.  Allow paint to air dry for approximately 24 hours, and then evaluate
    color.

   A. Standard SR       Maximum Delta E of 1.0 from the color standard
                       coordinates which are:

                       L* 80.95       a* 3.28        b* 21.69

   B. Ultralight SR     Maximum Delta E of 1.0 from the color standard
                       coordinates which are:

                       L*83.01        a* 2.19        b* 21.70

   C. Color Uniformity  Maximum Delta E of 0.5 color variation from sample
                       to sample taken within an SR shipment.

8.  Both parties will work diligently to achieve delta E of 0.5.

Supplier  shall  not  significantly  change  their  process,  manufacturing
methods, manufacturing sites, or substitute raw materials, or changes  made
in  the  physical or chemical properties of this material without  the  due
notification in writing to Hitox Corporation in advance.

<PAGE>                                57

                              SECOND SCHEDULE

                          Price Revision Formula



Base Price (P) = USD550 per MT (f.o.b. Malaysian Port)

New Supply Price (PN) in USD/MT
(PN) = (1.02N x P) + [1.75 (IN - IO) + 0.75 (FN - FO) + 700 (EN - EO)]

Where:-

     N     =   4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 for each year of the Supply Agreement
     IN    =   Average ilmenite price in USD/MT (60% Ti02 basis)
               over 3-month period prior to price adjustment
     IO    =   Ilmenite price of USD59/MT (60% Ti02 basis)]
     FN    =   Average fuel oil price in USD/MT over 3 month
               period prior to price adjustment
     FO    =   Fuel oil price of USD124/MT (being the current
               fuel oil price)
     EN    =   Average electricity price in USD/Kwh over 3-month
               period prior to price adjustment
     EO    =   USD0.063/Kwh (being the current electricity price)


Both  parties agree to negotiate the benefit of improvements in  production
efficiencies  and possible increased throughput in good faith  and  reflect
them in the supply price accordingly.

The  exchange rate used to convert the price of the ilmenite, fuel oil  and
electricity  from  Malaysian Ringgit (RM) to United  States  Dollars  (USD)
shall  be the exchange rate as quoted by Malayan Banking Berhad for the  3-
month period prior to the commencement of the Year in question.

<PAGE>                               58


<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           $2330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1334
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       6490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10207
<PP&E>                                            8907
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1901
<BONDS>                                              0
                                0
                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1193
<OTHER-SE>                                        9866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     12960
<SALES>                                          11583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 11583
<CGS>                                             8081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1008
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       991
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.21



</TABLE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission