<PAGE>
===============================================================================
1995
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
-----------------------
(Mark One)
[x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
Commission file number 1-10145
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
------------------------
Delaware 95-4160558
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1221 McKinney Street, 77010
Suite 1600, Houston, Texas (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 652-7200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
------------------- -------------------
Common Stock ($1.00 par value) New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.
[x]
----------
There were 80,000,000 shares of the registrant's common stock
outstanding on December 31, 1995. The aggregate market value of the voting
stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on March 1, 1996 based on the
closing price on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape on that date, was
$981,828,924.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 1995
(incorporated by reference under Part III).
================================================================================
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Item Page
- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
1. and 2. Business and Properties............................ 1
The Company's Business............................. 1
Development of Business............................ 1
Summary Description of Business Segments........... 2
Petrochemical Segment.............................. 2
Overview........................................... 2
Feedstocks......................................... 4
Marketing and Sales................................ 5
Competition and Industry Conditions................ 6
Capital Program and Business Strategies............ 7
Properties......................................... 7
Employee Relations................................. 8
Refining Segment................................... 8
Overview........................................... 8
Upgrade Project.................................... 9
Management of LCR.................................. 10
Feedstocks......................................... 10
Marketing and Sales................................ 11
Other Agreements................................... 12
Competition and Industry Conditions................ 12
Capital Program.................................... 13
Properties......................................... 13
Employee Relations................................. 13
Related Party Transactions......................... 13
Research and Technology; Patents and Trademarks.... 14
Finance Matters.................................... 15
Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements.......... 15
Environmental Matters.............................. 17
3. Legal Proceedings.................................. 18
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 22
Executive Officers of the Registrant............... 22
Description of Capital Stock....................... 25
</TABLE>
PART II
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C>
5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters............................... 28
6. Selected Financial Data............................ 30
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations............... 30
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data........ 40
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure............... 61
</TABLE>
PART III
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<C> <S> <C>
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the
Registrant........................................ 61
11. Executive Compensation............................. 61
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management.................................... 61
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions..... 61
</TABLE>
PART IV
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<C> <S> <C>
14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and
Reports on Form 8-K............................... 62
</TABLE>
i
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEMS 1 AND 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS
Lyondell Petrochemical Company operates in two business segments: petrochemicals
and refining. As the context may require, all references hereafter to the
"Company" or "Lyondell" include Lyondell Petrochemical Company, its wholly-owned
subsidiaries and LYONDELL-CITGO Refining Company Ltd. ("LCR"). The Company
manufactures a wide variety of petrochemicals, including olefins (ethylene,
propylene, butadiene, butylenes and certain specialty products); polyolefins
(polypropylene and high- and low-density polyethylene); methanol; methyl
tertiary butyl ether ("MTBE") and aromatics. Through its interest in LCR, a
Texas limited liability company, the Company produces refined petroleum
products, including gasoline, heating oil, jet fuel, fuel oil, aromatics and
lubricants ("lube oils"). The Company's petrochemical products are used
primarily in the manufacture of other chemicals and products, which in turn are
used in the production of a wide variety of consumer and industrial products.
LCR sells its principal refined products primarily to CITGO Petroleum
Corporation ("CITGO").
DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS
Lyondell was formed in 1985 and was operated as a separate division ("Lyondell
Division") of Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO") through June 1988. Effective
July 1, 1988, ARCO transferred substantially all the assets and liabilities
relating to the integrated petrochemical and petroleum processing business of
the Lyondell Division, along with certain pipeline assets that were not formerly
a part of the Lyondell Division, to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lyondell
Petrochemical Company, a Delaware corporation. In exchange for the transfer of
such assets and liabilities, Lyondell issued additional shares of its Common
Stock to ARCO. On January 25, 1989, ARCO completed an initial public offering
of 43,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock.
In February 1990, the Company acquired a polypropylene plant and a low-density
polyethylene plant located in Pasadena, Texas ("Bayport Facility").
In July 1993, pursuant to agreements between the Company and CITGO (and its
affiliates), the Company contributed its refining business, including the
refinery ("the Refinery"), the lube oil blending and packaging plant in
Birmingport, Alabama and refining working capital to LCR, and retained a
participation interest in LCR through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lyondell
Refining Company. At December 31, 1995, the Company had an approximate 90
percent participation interest in LCR while CITGO held the remaining approximate
10 percent participation interest. The results of LCR's operations currently are
consolidated into the Company's financial statements. For further discussion of
this transaction, see "REFINING SEGMENT -- Overview".
In August 1994, ARCO completed an offering ("ARCO Note Offering") of three-year
debt securities ("Exchangeable Notes") exchangeable pursuant to the terms of the
Exchangeable Notes upon maturity, at ARCO's option, into Lyondell Common Stock
or cash with an equal value. If ARCO elects to deliver shares of Lyondell
Common Stock at the maturity of the Notes, ARCO's equity interest in Lyondell
will be substantially reduced or eliminated, depending on the price of Lyondell
Common Stock at such time. In connection with the ARCO Note Offering, the five
ARCO officers who were Directors of the Company resigned from the Company's
Board of Directors. Until the maturity of the Exchangeable Notes, ARCO has
indicated that it generally intends to vote its shares in proportion to the
votes of the non-ARCO stockholders, except under certain limited circumstances.
See "RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS". As of March 1, 1996, ARCO owned 39,921,400
shares of Lyondell Common Stock, representing 49.9 percent of the issued and
outstanding Common Stock of the Company.
In May 1995, the Company acquired Occidental Chemical Corporation's Alathon(R)
high-density polyethylene ("HDPE") business. Assets involved in this acquisition
included resin production facilities in Matagorda (the "Matagorda Facility") and
Victoria (the "Victoria Facility"), Texas, related research and development
activities and the rights to the ALATHON trademark.
1
<PAGE>
In August 1995, the Company announced commencement of an engineering study of
the planned construction of a worldscale olefins plant. The proposed 2 billion
pound per year plant would be jointly owned by the Company and three other
olefins producers. The project is contingent upon approval of definitive
agreements which are expected to be signed in 1996.
For additional information relating to certain continuing relationships and
potential conflicts of interest among Lyondell, LCR, ARCO and ARCO Chemical
Company ("ARCO Chemical"), an 83.3 percent owned subsidiary of ARCO, see
"RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS", included herein, and "Transactions Between the
Company and ARCO" and "Principal Stockholders" which are included in the
Company's 1995 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference as part of
Item 13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
See Note 19 of "NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS".
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS SEGMENTS
PETROCHEMICAL SEGMENT
OVERVIEW
PETROCHEMICAL OPERATIONS
Channelview Facility -- Lyondell's Channelview petrochemical complex (the
"Channelview Facility"), located in Channelview, Texas, 20 miles east of
Houston, includes two large olefins plants, a methanol plant, a butadiene
recovery unit, a product flexibility unit (which has the capability to convert
ethylene and other light hydrocarbon streams into propylene), an aromatics
(benzene and toluene) recovery unit, two MTBE units, a butylene isomerization
unit, an isoprene recovery unit and other petrochemical processing units. The
Channelview Facility is connected by multiple pipelines to LCR's Refinery which
is approximately 16 miles away. The Channelview Facility also is connected by a
comprehensive pipeline system to the Company's Mont Belvieu, Texas storage
facility ("Mont Belvieu Facility"), to leased storage terminals and to customers
along the Gulf Coast. Ethylene and propylene are shipped or exchanged through
this pipeline system. See "PETROCHEMICAL SEGMENT --Properties".
The Company's olefins plants and related processing units produce ethylene,
propylene, butadiene, butylenes, benzene, toluene, hydrogen and certain
specialty products, such as isoprene, dicyclopentadiene, resin oils and
piperylenes, along with gasoline blendstocks and heavy liquid fuels. The
Company's petrochemical products are used to manufacture intermediate chemicals,
which are primarily used in a variety of consumer and industrial products.
Petrochemicals are fundamental to many segments of the economy, including the
production of consumer products, housing components, automotive products and
other durable and non-durable goods. Ethylene is the most significant
petrochemical in terms of worldwide production volume and is the key building
block for a large number of chemicals. With the wide proliferation of end-use
products derived from ethylene during the past 20 years, especially as plastics
have developed into low cost, high performance substitutes for a wide range of
materials such as metals and paper, U.S. ethylene consumption has grown by an
average annual rate of approximately four percent.
Ethylene is used as a feedstock to manufacture polyethylene, which is used in
products such as trash bags, packaging film, toys, housewares and milk
containers. Ethylene also is used to produce ethylene oxide (used to produce
ethylene glycol which is used to produce antifreeze and polyester fibers),
ethylene dichloride (used to produce polyvinyl chloride for pipe and other vinyl
products), ethylbenzene (used to produce styrene, which in turn is used to
produce polystyrene for packaging and containers) and alpha olefins (used in the
manufacture of detergents, as well as other intermediate chemicals).
Propylene is used to manufacture polypropylene, which is used in products such
as carpets, food packaging, upholstery, automobile parts and plastic bottles.
Propylene is also used to manufacture acrylonitrile (used in clothing and high
impact plastics), propylene oxide (used in polyurethane foams for furniture and
insulation) and oxo products (used in industrial solvents, as well as other
intermediate chemicals).
2
<PAGE>
Butadiene is used to manufacture styrene butadiene rubber and polybutadiene
rubber, both of which are used in the manufacture of tires and other rubber
products. Butadiene is also used in the production of nylon and acrylonitrile-
butadiene-styrene plastics.
Aromatics products include benzene and toluene. Benzene is used to produce
styrene, phenol and nylon. Toluene is used as an octane enhancer, for benzene
production and in urethane chemicals. These products are used in the production
of plastics, rubber, fibers for carpet and apparel, in gasoline and in
polyurethane foams used in seat cushions.
Specialty products produced at the Channelview Facility include feedstocks for
the production of various types of hydrocarbon resins and unsaturated polyester
resins. These products are used in the production of inks, adhesives, paints
and varnishes, rubber and fiberglass.
The Company also produces methanol and MTBE. Methanol is used to produce MTBE
and a variety of chemical intermediates, including formaldehyde, acetic acid and
methyl methacrylate. These intermediates are used to produce bonding adhesives
for plywood as well as in polyester fibers and plastics. Other end uses include
solvents and antifreeze applications. MTBE is an octane enhancer and clean fuel
additive in reformulated gasoline. All MTBE produced at the Channelview
Facility and not produced for LCR for gasoline blending is sold to a single
customer. See "PETROCHEMICAL SEGMENT -- Competition and Industry Conditions",
"Properties" and "RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS".
The following table shows the current annual rated capacity for certain of the
Company's principal petrochemical products.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RATED CAPACITY (A)
AT DECEMBER 31,
1995
----
(MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
PETROCHEMICAL PRODUCT:
Ethylene (pounds)....... 3,720 (b)
Propylene (pounds)...... 2,170 (c)
Butadiene (pounds)...... 615
Methanol (gallons)...... 248 (d)
MTBE (gallons).......... 199
Aromatics (gallons)..... 130
- --------------
</TABLE>
(a) The term "rated capacity", as used in this table and throughout this report,
is calculated by estimating the number of days in a typical year that a
production unit of a plant is expected to operate, after allowing for
downtime for regular maintenance, and multiplying that number by an amount
equal to the unit's optimal daily output based on the design feedstock mix.
Because the rated capacity of a production unit is an estimated amount, the
actual production volumes may be more or less than rated capacity.
(b) The Company is undertaking a debottleneck project of its olefins units that
will increase ethylene capacity by approximately seven percent. A
turnaround and debottleneck on one unit was completed during the fourth
quarter of 1995, and the resulting increased capacity is reflected in the
table. This project is expected to be completed during the second quarter
of 1996 when the second unit will be taken down for a turnaround and
debottleneck. Upon completion, total ethylene capacity is expected to be
approximately 3.8 billion pounds.
(c) Does not include refinery grade material or production from the product
flexibility unit, which has a current rated capacity of one billion pounds
per year of propylene.
(d) Capacity as shown includes equivalent methanol that could be produced from
reformed gas, an intermediate in the production of methanol.
3
<PAGE>
POLYMERS OPERATIONS
Bayport Facility -- The Bayport Facility converts propylene and ethylene
supplied by the Channelview Facility into polypropylene and low-density
polyethylene that is sold into derivative markets. The Bayport Facility is
connected by pipeline to the Company's Mont Belvieu Facility for feedstock
supply.
Matagorda Facility -- The Matagorda Facility converts ethylene and small
amounts of comonomer into HDPE. Beginning in 1996, a significant portion of the
ethylene converted at the Matagorda Facility will be supplied by the Channelview
Facility via exchange agreements. The Matagorda Facility features three
independent reaction and finishing process lines that employ the Nissan slurry
polymerization technology. This enables Lyondell to produce a wide variety of
resins for blown film, blow molding and injection molding applications.
Victoria Facility -- The Victoria Facility converts ethylene and small amounts
of comonomer into HDPE resins. Beginning in 1996, a significant portion of the
ethylene converted at the Victoria Facility will be supplied by the Channelview
Facility via exchange agreements. The Victoria Facility features solution
polymerization technology that minimizes the presence of catalyst residues.
This feature results in resins with excellent organoleptic properties (no taste
or odor) and extremely low moisture vapor transmission rates. This enables
Lyondell to produce a wide variety of injection molding and film resins for use
in consumer products and industrial applications.
Polymers Technology Center -- Research and development is conducted in a
catalyst laboratory with state-of-the-art analytical capabilities in Alvin,
Texas (the "Technology Center"). The Technology Center provides product and
process technology support for the Company's polymers operations and its
customers.
The following table shows the current annual rated capacity for each of the
Company's principal polyolefins products.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RATED CAPACITY
AT DECEMBER 31,
1995
--------------
(MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
POLYOLEFINS PRODUCT:
High-density polyethylene (pounds)................... 1,500
Polypropylene (pounds)............................... 300*
Low-density polyethylene (pounds).................... 140
</TABLE>
________________
*The Company is undertaking a debottleneck project that will expand
polypropylene capacity by approximately 33% to 400 million pounds and is
scheduled to be completed in the second quarter of 1996.
FEEDSTOCKS
The primary feedstocks used in the production of olefins are natural gas liquids
feedstocks including ethane, propane and butane (collectively "NGLs") and
naphtha, condensates and gas oils (collectively "Petroleum Liquids"). Olefins
plants with the flexibility to consume a wide range of feedstocks are better
able to maintain higher levels of profitability during periods of changing
energy and petrochemical prices than olefins plants that are restricted in their
feedstock processing capability. Prior to the mid 1970's, the feedstocks used
at most ethylene plants in the United States consisted predominantly of NGLs.
As of January 1, 1996, approximately 40 percent of domestic ethylene plant
capacity was limited to NGL feedstocks, and the remaining approximately 60
percent could process to some extent both NGLs and Petroleum Liquids.
Petroleum Liquids have had a significant historical margin advantage over ethane
and propane. The industry margin differential between these feedstocks has been
typically between one and four cents per pound of ethylene. The Company has the
capability to capture this differential at the Channelview Facility due to its
feedstock flexibility. The Company's olefins plants can process 100 percent
Petroleum Liquids or up to 90 percent NGL feedstocks. The Company's olefins
plants use from 125,000 to 160,000 barrels per day of NGLs and/or Petroleum
Liquids feedstocks. The Company obtains a portion of its olefins feedstock
requirements from LCR (NGLs, naphtha and gas oil) and additional olefins
feedstock in the form of petroleum condensates pursuant to a contract
4
<PAGE>
with an affiliate of a foreign government. The remainder of its Petroleum
Liquids requirements are obtained under short-term contracts or on the spot
market from a variety of foreign and domestic sources. The Company also
purchases NGLs from a wide variety of domestic sources, many of which have
pipeline connections to the Company's facilities.
The Company's methanol plant generally processes natural gas feedstocks but also
has the ability to process NGL feedstocks. The Company purchases natural gas
from a variety of domestic sources for use as fuel at its facilities and as
feedstock for the methanol plant and is connected to a diverse natural gas
supply network.
All of the ethylene and propylene converted at the Bayport Facility is supplied
by the Channelview Facility. Under a supply agreement with Occidental Chemical
Company, portions of the Company's ethylene supply needs at the Victoria and
Matagorda Facilities are supplied by Occidental. Beginning in 1996, the Company
began using significant amounts of ethylene from its Channelview Facility to
partially supply feedstock requirements of the Victoria and Matagorda Facilities
in the production of HDPE via exchange arrangements.
MARKETING AND SALES
Lyondell sells a majority of its olefins products to customers with whom it has
long-standing relationships. Sales generally are made pursuant to written
agreements which typically provide for monthly negotiation of price based upon
current market prices for products sold under contract. The parties are
contractually committed to use their best efforts to agree monthly on price
terms. Nonetheless, if the parties fail to agree on a monthly price, in some
cases deliveries may be suspended for the month. The term of these contracts is
typically three to five years with automatic one year term extension provisions
which cause the contract to remain in effect after the initial term unless
expressly terminated by one of the parties. Some of these contracts are subject
to early termination if deliveries have been suspended for several months. The
contracts typically require the customer to purchase a specified minimum
quantity while establishing a quantity range whereby the customer has the right
to purchase additional quantities up to a specified maximum.
The Company sells substantially all of its methanol output and most of its
aromatics output under contracts that have initial terms ranging from two to
three years and that typically contain automatic one year term extension
provisions which cause the contracts to remain in effect after the initial term
expires unless expressly terminated by one of the parties. These contracts
generally provide for monthly or quarterly price adjustments based upon current
market prices. Aromatics produced at the Refinery, with the exception of
benzene, are marketed by Lyondell for LCR under contracts with similar terms to
its own. Benzene produced at the Refinery is sold directly to Lyondell at
market-related prices. Lyondell licenses MTBE technology from ARCO Chemical and
sells MTBE produced at one of its two units to ARCO Chemical at market-based
prices. The production from the second unit is produced for LCR for gasoline
blending. In addition, Lyondell has entered into a joint development and
licensing arrangement to accelerate commercialization of two isomerization
processes that produce feedstocks for MTBE and tertiary amyl methyl ether
("TAME") which are blending components for reformulated gasoline. See "RESEARCH
AND TECHNOLOGY; PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS".
The Company's polyolefins products are sold to established customers, many under
term contracts, typically having a duration of one to two years. The remainder
is generally sold without contractual term commitments. In either case, in most
of the continuous supply relationships, prices are subject to change at any time
upon mutual agreement between Lyondell and the customer.
Most of the Company's ethylene and propylene is shipped or exchanged via a
comprehensive pipeline system which has connections to numerous Gulf Coast
ethylene and propylene consumers. The pipeline system is owned by ARCO Pipe
Line Company, and substantially all of it is leased by the Company under long-
term leasing arrangements. See "PETROCHEMICAL SEGMENT -- Properties" and
"RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS". The Company has exchange agreements with other
olefins producers which allow access to customers who are not directly connected
to the pipeline system. Some propylene is shipped by ocean-going vessel.
Butadiene, methanol, aromatics and other petrochemicals are distributed by
pipeline, railcar, truck, barge or ocean-going vessel. Polyolefins are
primarily distributed via railcar. The Company owns or leases pursuant to long-
term lease arrangements approximately 3,200 railcars for use in its
petrochemicals business.
5
<PAGE>
COMPETITION AND INDUSTRY CONDITIONS
The basis for competition in Lyondell's petrochemical products is product
quality, product deliverability, service and price. Lyondell competes with
other large domestic producers of olefins and polyolefins, including Amoco
Chemical Company, Chevron Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Company, Exxon Chemical
Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Mobil Chemical Company, Phillips
Petroleum Company and Shell Chemical Company. Historically, petrochemical
industry profitability has been affected by vigorous price competition which may
intensify due to, among other things, new domestic and foreign industry
capacity. In general, weak economic conditions either in the United States or
in the world tend to reduce demand and put pressure on margins. Petrochemical
profitability can be affected by the level of demand for petrochemical and
petrochemical derivative exports to producing units throughout the world. It is
not possible to predict accurately how changes in feedstock costs, market
conditions or other factors will affect petrochemical industry margins in the
future.
The combined rated capacity of the Company's olefins units at January 1, 1996
was approximately 3.7 billion pounds of ethylene per year or approximately 7.3
percent of total domestic production capacity. Based on published rated
production capacities, the Company believes it is one of the six largest
producers of ethylene in the United States. Of the total ethylene production
capacity in the United States, approximately 91 percent is located along the
Gulf Coast, and approximately 75 percent is owned by ten manufacturers. Domestic
industry ethylene rated capacity at January 1, 1996 was approximately 51 billion
pounds per year. As a producer of olefins primarily for merchant supply to
unaffiliated customers, Lyondell has typically experienced greater variations in
its sales volumes and profitability when industry supply and demand
relationships are at extremes in comparison to more integrated competitors,
i.e., those with a higher proportion of captive demand for olefins derivatives
production. However, as a result of the acquisition of the ALATHON HDPE
business, a greater percentage of the Channelview Facility's annual ethylene
production will be converted at the Company's downstream facilities.
The petrochemical industry historically has experienced periods of high demand
and high capacity utilization which result in increasingly higher operating
margins and profitability. This generally has resulted in new capacity
investment until supply exceeds demand. The overcapacity in turn has resulted in
periods of decreasing capacity utilization and declining operating margins until
demand exceeds supply and the cycle has been repeated. For example, capacity
additions, combined with poor overall U.S. and world economic conditions and
further additions to supply in other parts of the world, generally outpaced
ethylene demand growth in 1990-1992 and caused the industry to experience a
decline in margins through 1993. However, during 1994 and through the first half
of 1995, domestic ethylene demand grew at an annual average rate of
approximately 5 percent, and the domestic olefins industry operated at close to
maximum available capacity, resulting in higher industry margins. In the second
half of 1995, capacity additions resulting from new plants and plant expansions
totaled approximately 3 billion pounds, putting pressure on industry margins.
However, anticipated ethylene capacity increases in 1996 and 1997 are expected
to be below recent average annual demand growth.
All of the Company's other major commodity chemical products experience cyclical
market conditions similar to (although not necessarily coincident with) those of
ethylene. In 1995, polyolefins markets tracked the olefins markets, beginning
the year with strong demand and prices, which declined in the second half of the
year. Much of the demand increase was attributed to inventory accumulations
during late 1994 and into 1995. Following the stabilization and decline of
ethylene prices in 1995, the polyolefins industry experienced inventory
reductions. In addition, new capacity in 1995 and 1996 has impacted industry
margins.
The provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (the "Clean Air Act")
require the manufacture and sale of alternative fuels, including reformulated
gasoline. There is strong competition between MTBE, ethanol and ethyl tertiary
butyl ether ("ETBE") for the oxygenate market, and it is difficult to predict
the outcome of this competition which will depend, in part, on the future of tax
subsidies and possible market share mandates for ethanol and consumer
preferences. The Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") specifically mandated
that the nine metropolitan areas in the United States with the most severe ozone
problems begin using reformulated gasoline year-round beginning in 1995 to
prevent ozone formation. In addition, a number of states opted to utilize
reformulated gasoline on a state-wide basis ("opting-in"). The EPA has
subsequently allowed certain areas to opt-out of the program and uncertainties
have developed with respect to the level of future use of reformulated
gasolines. Because of the uncertainties in the reformulated gasoline market, it
is difficult to predict the impact of this end-use on the future demands for
MTBE and methanol.
6
<PAGE>
CAPITAL PROGRAM AND BUSINESS STRATEGIES
The petrochemical segment's fixed asset capital expenditures totaled $121
million (excluding the acquisition of the ALATHON HDPE business) in 1995 and its
capital budget for 1996 is $79 million. Major scheduled capital projects
include continued work on the expansion of the butylene alkylation unit at the
Channelview Facility, completion of a debottleneck of the polypropylene plant at
the Bayport Facility and the completion of the debottleneck project of the two
olefins units at the Channelview Facility.
As part of its ongoing operations, the Company periodically conducts maintenance
turnarounds on its facilities. Although turnarounds on principal facilities are
usually scheduled well in advance, the timing of such turnarounds can be
accelerated or delayed because of numerous factors, many of which are beyond the
Company's control. The Company underwent a turnaround and debottleneck on one of
its two olefins units during the fourth quarter of 1995. The second olefins unit
is currently scheduled for a turnaround and debottleneck in the second quarter
of 1996.
When conducting a maintenance turnaround on a principal facility, capital
expenditures and maintenance expenditures as well as lost operating income are
typically incurred. In accordance with the Company's accounting policies,
repair and maintenance expenses associated with turnarounds exceeding $5 million
are capitalized when incurred and amortized on a straight-line basis until the
next planned turnaround, generally four to six years. Prior to 1993, all repair
and maintenance expenses associated with turnarounds were expensed as incurred.
The Company believes that the current method of accounting is preferable in that
it provides for a better matching of repair and maintenance expenses associated
with turnarounds with future product revenues. See Note 2 of "NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS".
The Company's business strategies are to maintain and improve its low-cost
position, reduce cyclicality and volatility and grow the business profitably.
Lyondell continually evaluates opportunities to expand or further diversify its
petrochemical operations through potential acquisitions, joint ventures and
other opportunities involving third parties. The acquisition of the ALATHON HDPE
business with its unique market advantages and integration benefits will be an
important olefins volume stabilizer in poor market conditions. Management
believes that industry trends may provide additional opportunities to enhance
shareholder value. This could be accomplished by applying the Company's
expertise in the efficient and low-cost operation of its facilities to a larger
asset base. Additional vertical integration with an ethylene or propylene
consumer could increase olefins plant operating rates during weak market periods
by providing captive outlets. Horizontal integration with another olefins
producer could improve operating efficiencies by spreading overhead costs across
larger volumes and enhancing operating flexibility. Consistent with the
Company's overall strategy, however, management's intent is to undertake such
transactions only if it expects that the transactions would produce both near-
term and long-term improved cash flow and produce returns in excess of the
Company's cost of capital.
Potential funding sources for significant capital projects, whether involving
transactions with third parties or otherwise, could include, without limitation,
the Company's current financial resources, potential earnings growth, future
borrowings and future issuance of equity securities, as well as possible
contractual arrangements such as joint ventures or partnerships. Both the
Company's ability to undertake and fund the particular strategies described
above and the level of the Company's capital commitments and expenditures from
period to period will be affected by a variety of factors including, without
limitation, the general business environment, as well as changes in applicable
government regulations and tax laws. See "FINANCE MATTERS".
PROPERTIES
The Company owns all of the plant and equipment that comprise its two olefins
plants at its Channelview Facility and owns the approximately 2,945 acre parcel
on which the complex is situated. The Company also owns the methanol plant and
other petrochemical processing units which are located at the Channelview
Facility. These include the product flexibility unit, two MTBE units, a butylene
isomerization unit, the butylene alkylation unit, the benzene and toluene
recovery unit, the butadiene recovery unit, the isoprene recovery unit and an
isopropyl alcohol unit. The isopropyl alcohol unit is used exclusively to
7
<PAGE>
process products for ARCO Chemical and all of the production from one of the
MTBE units is sold to ARCO Chemical. The Company also operates a styrene maleic
anhydride unit ("SMA") and a polybutadiene unit which are owned by a third party
and are located on property leased from the Company within the Channelview
Facility. A third party owns and operates a facility on land leased from the
Company that is used to purify hydrogen from the Company's methanol plant.
Lyondell owns several pipelines connecting the Channelview Facility, the
Refinery and the Mont Belvieu Facility, including six lines used to transport
heavy liquid feedstocks, butylenes, benzene, hydrogen, butane, MTBE and
unfinished gasolines between the Channelview Facility and the Refinery. The
Company also owns a barge docking facility capable of berthing eight barges and
its terminal equipment for loading and unloading. This facility is used for
loading methanol, pyrolysis fuel oil and pyrolysis gas oil into barges for
delivery to customers and unloading petroleum condensate barges for olefins
feedstocks.
At the Channelview Facility, the Company recovers and sells valuable
petrochemical components contained in a number of intermediate product streams.
The Channelview Facility includes units for butadiene recovery and aromatics
recovery. In addition, the Channelview Facility has recovered valuable
components such as high purity isoprene, piperylenes and dicyclopentadiene
("DCPD") and resin oils from its gasoline products since 1986. The Company uses
its proprietary butylene isomerization technology, known as ISOMPLUS(R), to
efficiently produce isobutylene from olefins plant butylene by-product streams.
In addition, in the first quarter of 1995, an MTBE unit debottleneck increased
the Company's MTBE production capacity by 19 percent. See "RESEARCH AND
TECHNOLOGY; PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS".
Lyondell also owns a storage facility, a brine pond facility and a tract of
vacant land at Mont Belvieu, Texas, located approximately 15 miles east of the
Channelview Facility. Storage capacity for up to 10 million barrels of NGL
feedstocks, ethylene, propylene and other products is provided in salt domes at
the Mont Belvieu Facility. The Company also owns an approximate 10 percent
undivided joint interest in much of the real property surrounding the Mont
Belvieu Facility. This property, which is owned jointly with several other
companies that operate storage or processing facilities at Mont Belvieu, is
maintained as a greenbelt for these facilities. The Company has a long-term
lease on product pipelines from the Mont Belvieu Facility to most olefins
customers.
The Company owns the real property, plant and equipment which comprise the
Bayport Facility located on approximately 187 acres in Pasadena, Texas. The
1995 acquisition of Occidental Chemical's ALATHON HDPE business included a 2,114
acre site 13 miles south of Bay City, Texas in Matagorda County which comprises
the Matagorda Facility. The Matagorda Facility also includes a pilot plant used
to enhance the Company's current product line as well as contribute to new
product and process developments. Lyondell also acquired the HDPE unit located
on a 33 acre site within the DuPont Chemical complex in Victoria, Texas which
comprises the Victoria Facility. The Company owns or leases pursuant to long-
term lease arrangements approximately 3,200 railcars for use in its
petrochemicals business.
Lyondell leases its executive offices and corporate headquarters in downtown
Houston. In addition, the Company leases facilities which house the Technology
Center in Alvin, Texas and storage facilities for the handling of products from
various third parties, primarily in the Gulf Coast area.
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
As of December 31, 1995, Lyondell, excluding LCR, employed approximately 1,500
full-time employees. The Company also uses the services of approximately 500
employees of independent contractors in the routine conduct of its business.
REFINING SEGMENT
OVERVIEW
The Refinery, located adjacent to the Houston Ship Channel in Pasadena, Texas,
includes a coker, a fluid catalytic cracking unit, three reformers, four crude
distillation units, two sulfur recovery plants and several hydrodesulfurization
units, as well as lube oil manufacturing and packaging facilities and an
aromatics recovery unit. It is connected by multiple pipelines to the
Channelview Facility and provides feedstocks to and receives production from
that facility.
Products manufactured at the Refinery include gasoline, heating oil, jet fuel,
aromatics (benzene, toluene, paraxylene and orthoxylene), lubricants (industrial
lubricants, motor oils, white oils, process oils and base oils) carbon black
oil, sulfur, residual fuel and petroleum coke fuel. Aromatics are used to
manufacture a variety of
8
<PAGE>
intermediate chemicals, including ethylbenzene, cumene, urethane foam components
and polyester intermediates for films, fibers and resins. End uses of these
products include packaging and containers, furniture, apparel and flooring.
LCR is undertaking a major upgrade project (the "Upgrade Project") at the
Refinery to enable the facility to process substantial additional volumes of
very heavy crude oil. LCR also has entered into a long-term crude supply
contract ("Crude Supply Contract") with Lagoven, S.A. ("LAGOVEN"), an affiliate
of CITGO. In addition, under the terms of a long-term product sales agreement
("Products Agreement"), CITGO purchases from LCR a majority of the refined
products produced at the Refinery. Both LAGOVEN and CITGO are direct or
indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. ("PDVSA"),
the national oil company of Venezuela.
Pursuant to agreements between the Company and CITGO (and their affiliates), the
Company contributed its refining assets (including the lube oil blending and
packaging plant in Birmingport, Alabama) and refining working capital to LCR in
July 1993. CITGO contributed $100 million to LCR in 1993 (excluding its
contribution towards the Upgrade Project described below) giving it an
approximate ten percent participation interest in LCR. Prior to the in-service
date for the Upgrade Project, CITGO has committed to reinvest its share of LCR's
operating cash flow and thereby increase its participation interest in LCR.
These contributions are used for ongoing LCR capital projects other than the
Upgrade Project and certain environmental capital projects for which liability
has been retained by the Company. Any additional ongoing LCR capital
requirements prior to the in-service date (for purposes other than the Upgrade
Project) are expected to be funded mostly by Lyondell, primarily in the form of
subordinated loans to LCR. In addition to the funding related to the Upgrade
Project described below, CITGO has one additional contribution commitment of $30
million to be made upon completion of the Upgrade Project and it has a one-time
option to make an additional equity contribution sufficient to increase its
participation interest in LCR to 50 percent.
The Company believes that the principal benefit from its participation in LCR
will be more stabilized earnings and cash flow from the refining business
resulting from the Upgrade Project as well as the long-term Crude Supply
Contract and the long-term Products Agreement, all of which are described below.
The expected benefits resulting from the agreement with CITGO will not be fully
realized until the projected completion of the Upgrade Project described below.
The Refinery began processing Venezuelan crude oil in the third quarter of 1992.
Since that time, improved operating efficiency has allowed the Refinery to
increase the volume of heavy Venezuelan crude oil processed, enabling LCR to
realize increased benefits associated with processing heavy Venezuelan crude
oil. Following the Upgrade Project, the earnings potential of LCR is expected
to be enhanced due to higher margins expected to be associated with the
resulting heavier crude oil mix and LCR's increased coking capability, enhanced
reformulated fuels and low sulfur diesel production capability and other yield
improvements. However, as described above, the Company's participation interest
following the Upgrade Project will decrease.
UPGRADE PROJECT
CITGO contributions and external borrowing have provided the majority of the
project funding for the Upgrade Project. Definitive cost engineering for the
Upgrade Project, previously estimated at $980 million, is currently undergoing
further study and could be increased. At the present time, it is anticipated
that any revised cost estimate for the project will not increase more than 10%.
The revised cost estimate will depend on a number of factors, including the
impact of scheduling decisions. The Upgrade Project, which is scheduled to be
operational in early 1997, is intended to increase the heavy crude oil
processing capability of the Refinery from 130,000 barrels per day of 22 degree
API gravity crude oil to 200,000 barrels per day of 17 degree API gravity crude
oil. The Upgrade Project is not intended to increase the total throughput of
the Refinery, but rather its ability to process heavier, higher margin, crude
oils. The Upgrade Project also includes expansion of the Refinery's
reformulated gasoline and low sulfur diesel production capability. Major
components of the Upgrade Project include new coking, crude distillation and
sulfur recovery units. Modifications to the Refinery's largest existing crude
distillation unit related to the Upgrade Project were completed in late 1994.
In addition, modifications have been completed on two existing hydrotreaters and
work is progressing on a third. A new gas oil hydrotreater and a new sulfur
plant are scheduled to be brought into service during 1996, followed by a new
crude oil distillation unit and modified sulfur recovery units. The final unit
to be commissioned will be a new coker, scheduled for early 1997.
Funding for the Upgrade Project has occurred in three phases. The first phase,
the initial $300 million, was funded by CITGO. The second phase was funded by
an LCR borrowing of $200 million. The third phase commenced in
9
<PAGE>
late 1995 and is being funded (i) 50 percent through an LCR borrowing, (ii) 25
percent through contributions from CITGO and (iii) 25 percent through
subordinated loans from the Company. Prior to completion of the Upgrade Project,
the financing costs for the Upgrade Project loans will be funded by CITGO. The
level of contributions from the Company and CITGO will be dependent upon the
total cost of the Upgrade Project. The current funding plan will apply for a
total Upgrade Project cost of up to $1 billion, and should result in Lyondell's
1996 share of approximately $100 million. Lyondell has funded approximately $25
million for the Upgrade Project, as of December 31, 1995, in the form of
subordinated loans. If total spending on the Upgrade Project exceeds $1 billion,
Lyondell expects to fund one-half of these additional costs in the form of
subordinated loans. In exchange for CITGO's Upgrade Project contributions
described above and an additional $30 million cash contribution at the in-
service date, CITGO's participation interest in LCR is expected to increase to
approximately 40 percent effective as of the in-service date. CITGO will have a
one-time option to increase its participation interest in LCR up to 50 percent
following the in-service date by making an additional equity contribution.
MANAGEMENT OF LCR
LCR is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the state of
Texas and has pass-through tax characteristics similar to those of a partnership
for federal income tax purposes. The Company owns its interest in LCR through a
wholly-owned subsidiary, Lyondell Refining Company. CITGO holds its interest
through CITGO Refining Investment Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CITGO
(together with Lyondell Refining Company, "the Owners"). The operative agreement
with respect to the rights of each of the Owners and their parent companies is
the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Regulations ("Regulations")
of LCR. The Regulations govern, among other things, ownership and cash
distribution rights. CITGO has committed to reinvest its share of operating cash
flow during the Upgrade Project which will increase its participation
percentage, while the Company has unrestricted access to its share of operating
cash flow from LCR. The initial term of the Regulations is 25 years, although
they may be terminated under certain circumstances, including insolvency of LCR
or either Owner and uncured material breaches by either Owner. Under the terms
of a reciprocal Performance Guarantee and Control Agreement ("Performance
Guarantee"), Lyondell and CITGO each unconditionally guarantee the obligations
and performance of their respective subsidiary-Owner under the terms of the
Regulations.
The Regulations provide that LCR is managed by an Owners Committee, which has
three representatives ("Representatives") from each Owner. Certain actions
require unanimous consent of the Representatives, including, without limitation,
amendment of the Regulations, borrowing money in excess of LCR's existing credit
facility, delegation of authority to committees, certain purchase commitments
and capital expenditures in excess of designated amounts and budgetary approval.
All actions not requiring unanimous consent can be determined by Lyondell so
long as it is the majority owner. The day-to-day operations of the Refinery are
managed by the executive officers of LCR. The results of LCR's operations are
currently consolidated into Lyondell's financial statements.
FEEDSTOCKS
The following table sets forth the Refinery's runs of blended crude oils (which
include crude oil and other petroleum liquids, unfinished oils and other
hydrocarbons) and unfinished stock.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
----------------------
1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ----
(THOUSAND BARRELS PER DAY)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REFINERY RUNS:
Blended crude oils................... 238 209 234
Unfinished stock..................... 48 64 50
--- --- ---
Total.................................. 286 273 284
=== === ===
</TABLE>
The Refinery can process a wide variety of domestic and foreign crude oil
feedstocks, including heavy (low API gravity, high viscosity) and sour (high
sulfur content) crude oils. In addition to 45,000 barrels per day of light
sweet crude oil for lubricants production, the Refinery can process up to (i)
approximately 220,000 barrels per day of light sour crude oil in a coking mode,
or (ii) in the mode in which it currently operates, approximately 130,000
barrels per day of heavy sour crude oil (22 degree API gravity) primarily in a
coking mode plus 80,000 barrels per day of light sour crude oil in a cracking
mode. It currently has a capacity rating of 265,000 barrels per day
10
<PAGE>
of crude oil and related feedstocks which is based on running West Texas Sour
("WTS") or equivalent crude oil in a "full conversion" mode. Full conversion
mode means processing crude oil feedstocks into a product output mix that
consists of a significant percentage of high value products, such as gasoline,
heating oil, jet fuel, aromatics, lube oils and olefins feedstocks which are
used by the Channelview Facility. The actual operating capability varies with
the type of crude oil it processes.
Prior to the completion of the Upgrade Project, LCR is required to purchase and
LAGOVEN is required to sell sufficient crude oil to satisfy LCR's coking
capacity, from a minimum of 125,000 barrels per day to a maximum of 135,000
barrels per day, of heavy Venezuelan crude oil. LAGOVEN has the right, but not
the obligation, to supply incremental amounts above 135,000 barrels per day.
Following completion of the Upgrade Project, that minimum is increased to
200,000 barrels per day (allowing for scheduled or unscheduled downtime).
The Crude Supply Contract incorporates a formula price based on the market value
of a slate of refined products deemed to be produced from each particular crude
oil or feedstock, less: (i) certain deemed refining costs, adjustable for
inflation; (ii) certain actual costs, including crude transportation costs,
import duties and taxes; and (iii) a deemed margin, which varies according to
the grade of crude oil or other feedstock delivered. Deemed margins and deemed
costs are adjusted periodically. These adjustments are based on, but less than,
the rate of inflation. Because deemed operating costs and the slate of refined
products deemed to be produced for a given barrel of crude oil or other
feedstock do not necessarily reflect the actual costs and yields in any period
and also because the market value of the refined products used in the pricing
formula does not necessarily reflect the actual price received for the refined
products, the actual refining margin earned by LCR under the Crude Supply
Contract will vary depending on, among other things, the efficiency with which
LCR conducts its operations during such period.
The heavy (22 degree API gravity) Venezuelan crude oil currently being processed
by LCR under the Crude Supply Contract contains heavy metals, naphthenic acids,
sulfur and residual fuels, which make it more difficult to process than lighter,
sweeter crude oils. The Refinery began processing Venezuelan crude oil in the
third quarter of 1992. Since that time, the Company and LCR have identified and
overcome certain obstacles inherent in processing high rates of heavy Venezuelan
crude oil, including making operational changes to the coker and physical
modifications to one of the crude distillation units. This has increased the
Refinery's capability of running high volumes of heavy Venezuelan crude oil up
to 130,000 barrels per day. The remainder of the Refinery's capacity is used to
process lighter crude oils and feedstocks.
There are risks associated with enforcing the provisions of contracts with an
affiliate of a foreign government such as LAGOVEN, including the risks
associated with enforcing judgments of United States courts against entities
whose assets may be located outside of the United States and whose management
does not reside in the United States. Depending on then current market
conditions, breach or termination of the Crude Supply Contract could adversely
affect the Company. Although the parties have negotiated alternative
arrangements in the event of certain force majeure conditions, including
governmental or other actions restricting or otherwise limiting LAGOVEN's
ability to perform its obligations, any such alternative arrangements may not be
as beneficial as the Crude Supply Contract. There can be no assurance that
alternative crude oils with similar margins would be available for purchase by
LCR. Furthermore, the breach or termination of the Crude Supply Contract would
require LCR to return to the practice of purchasing all of its crude oil
feedstocks in the merchant market and would again subject LCR to significant
volatility and price fluctuations. However, the Company believes that this
transaction holds substantial economic and other incentives for all parties to
perform their obligations. Lyondell believes that PDVSA has a strategic
interest in expanding its crude oil refining operations in the United States in
order to increase the markets for its heavy sour crude oil and that the
financial commitments of CITGO should provide an economic incentive for all
PDVSA affiliates to perform their obligations under the various agreements.
MARKETING AND SALES
The Refinery produces gasoline, heating oil, jet fuel, aromatics, lube oils and
certain industrial products. On a weekly basis, LCR evaluates and determines the
optimal product output mix for the Refinery, based on spot market prices and
conditions. Effective July 1, 1993, LCR and CITGO entered into a 25 year
Products Agreement. Pursuant to that agreement, CITGO is currently purchasing
100 percent of the gasoline, jet fuel and heating oil manufactured at the
Refinery. These products are purchased by CITGO at market-based prices. For
example, the price for gasoline is based on prices published by Platts Oilgram,
an industry trade publication.
11
<PAGE>
Lube oils are manufactured and sold by LCR directly to industrial consumers and
to distributors throughout the United States and international markets. Branded
lubricants marketed by LCR include both paraffinic and naphthenic oils, rubber
process oils, base oils used to blend into finished lubricant products, food-
grade white oils and an extensive variety of engine oils and industrial
lubricants. Lyondell is the sole marketing agent for LCR's aromatics (see
"PETROCHEMICAL SEGMENT -- Marketing and Sales") with the exception of benzene
which is sold directly to Lyondell at market-related prices.
OTHER AGREEMENTS
The Company and LCR have entered into multiple agreements designed to preserve
much of the synergy between the Refinery and the Channelview Facility. Economic
evaluations at the Channelview Facility and the Refinery are based on sending
products to the highest-value disposition, which may be local use, use at the
other site, or third party sales. Certain refinery products (propane, butane,
low-octane naphthas, heating oils, and gas oils) can be used as feedstocks for
olefins production, and certain Channelview Facility olefins by-products
(pyrolysis gasoline and pyrolysis gas oil) can be processed by the Refinery into
gasoline, jet fuel or heating oil. Butylenes from the LCR Refinery are tolled
through the Channelview Facility for the production of alkylate and MTBE for
gasoline blending. Hydrogen from the Channelview Facility is used at the
Refinery for sulfur removal and product stabilization.
Also effective July 1, 1993, the majority of the employees formerly employed by
Lyondell in its refining business became employees of LCR. Pursuant to the
terms of a number of service agreements, Lyondell has contracted with LCR to
continue to perform services in certain areas, including employee services,
administrative services and marketing services. Lyondell and LCR also entered
into a variety of contracts providing for the assignment or licensing of
intellectual property rights associated with the refining business.
COMPETITION AND INDUSTRY CONDITIONS
All of LCR's gasoline, heating oil and jet fuel are sold to CITGO under the
Products Agreement. LCR continues to sell lube oils directly to major
industrial consumers and through distributors in domestic and international
markets.
The refining business tends to be volatile as well as cyclical. Crude oil
prices, which are impacted by worldwide political events and the economics of
exploration and production in addition to refined products demand, are the
largest source of this volatility. Demand for refined products is influenced by
seasonal and short-term factors such as weather and driving patterns, as well as
by longer term issues such as energy conservation and alternative fuels.
Industry refined products supply is also dependent on industry operating
capabilities and on long-term refining capacity trends. However, management
believes that the combination of the Crude Supply Contract and the Products
Agreement have and will continue to stabilize future earnings and cash flows and
reduce the market driven aspects of such volatility. Prior to the completion of
the Upgrade Project, the keys to operational success for LCR continue to be
maximizing the amount of heavy Venezuelan crude oil processed in the coking
mode, optimizing the efficient utilization of the remaining cracking capacity
and low-cost operations.
Among LCR's refining competitors are major integrated petroleum companies that
have their own raw material resources and, in many cases, downstream markets,
both of which tend to decrease the impact of business cycles on these
competitor's sales volumes and profitability. Many of the domestic refiners are
owned by or affiliated with major integrated oil companies. Based on published
industry data, as of January 1, 1996, there were 169 crude oil refineries in
operation in the United States, and total domestic refinery capacity was
approximately 15 million barrels per day. During 1995, LCR processed an average
of 238,000 barrels per day of blended crude oil or approximately two percent of
domestic capacity.
12
<PAGE>
CAPITAL PROGRAM
The refining segment's capital expenditures for additions to fixed assets
(excluding spending on the Upgrade Project) totaled $47 million in 1995. The
refining segment's capital budget (excluding the Upgrade Project) for 1996 is
approximately $46 million. Of the total 1996 capital budget, approximately $25
million is expected to be spent on environmentally-related capital projects,
including a wastewater management plan developed in response to state
regulations regarding emissions. See "ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS". The funds
contributed by CITGO in the previous approximately three years (see "REFINING
SEGMENT -- Overview") were used for capital spending by LCR and reduced the
total capital expenditures that the Company otherwise would have been required
to make in connection with Refinery operations through 1995. (See "Upgrade
Project" for a discussion of spending on the Upgrade Project.)
As part of its ongoing operations, LCR periodically conducts maintenance
turnarounds on its facilities. Although turnarounds on principal facilities are
usually scheduled well in advance, the timing of such turnarounds can be
accelerated or delayed because of numerous factors, many of which are beyond
LCR's control. LCR has a planned turnaround scheduled for the Fluid Catalytic
Cracking Unit in 1996 to precede start-up of the new distillation unit and the
new coker that are part of the Upgrade Project.
When conducting a maintenance turnaround on a principal facility, capital
expenditures as well as repair and maintenance expenditures and lost operating
income are typically incurred. In accordance with the Company's accounting
policies, repair and maintenance expenses associated with turnarounds exceeding
$5 million are capitalized when incurred and amortized on a straight-line basis
until the next planned turnaround, generally four to six years. Prior to 1993,
all repair and maintenance expenses associated with turnarounds were expensed as
incurred. The Company believes that the current method of accounting is
preferable in that it provides for a better matching of repair and maintenance
expenses associated with turnarounds with future revenues. See Note 2 of "NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS".
The Company remains obligated to fund certain Refinery environmental projects
initiated prior to the creation of LCR as well as its share of a base level of
Refinery capital improvements; the total of these obligations is estimated to be
approximately $75 million through the completion of the Upgrade Project, of
which approximately $37 million has been spent through 1995. The level and
timing of these anticipated capital commitments and expenditures will be
affected by changes in applicable governmental regulations, including
environmental and tax laws.
PROPERTIES
LCR owns the real property, plant and equipment which comprise the Refinery,
located on an approximately 700 acre site in Houston, Texas. Units include the
fluid catalytic cracking unit, the coker, reformers, crude distillation units,
sulfur recovery plants and hydrodesulfurization units, as well as lube oil
manufacturing and packaging facilities and an aromatics recovery unit. LCR also
owns the real property, plant and equipment which comprise a lube oil blending
and packaging plant in Birmingport, Alabama. LCR owns a pipeline used to
transport gasoline, kerosene and heating oil from the Refinery to the GATX
Terminal to interconnect with common carrier pipelines.
Lyondell owns several pipelines connecting the Channelview Facility, the
Refinery and the Mont Belvieu Facility, including six lines used to transport
heavy liquid feedstocks, butylenes, benzene, hydrogen, butane, MTBE and
unfinished gasolines between the Channelview Facility and the Refinery.
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
At year-end, LCR employed approximately 1,250 full-time employees. LCR also
uses the services of approximately 250 employees of independent contractors in
the routine conduct of its business and, in addition, is using approximately
4,000 additional contractors currently working on the Upgrade Project. Certain
hourly workers at the Refinery are covered by collective bargaining agreements
between LCR and the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Union (approximately 775
employees).
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In connection with the transfer of assets and liabilities to Lyondell and the
initial public offering of Lyondell's common stock in January 1989, the Company
and ARCO entered into a number of agreements for the purpose of defining their
ongoing relationships. In addition, in July 1987, Lyondell and ARCO Chemical,
then a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARCO, entered into a number of agreements in
connection with the organization of ARCO Chemical. None of these agreements was
the result of arm's-length negotiations between independent parties. It was the
intention of Lyondell, ARCO and ARCO Chemical that such agreements and the
transactions provided for
13
<PAGE>
therein, taken as a whole, accommodate the parties' interests in a manner that
was fair to the parties, while continuing certain mutually beneficial
arrangements. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company,
whose members are not affiliated with the Company, ARCO or its affiliates, has
determined that such agreements, taken as a whole, were fair to the Company and
its stockholders. Because of the complexity of the various relationships between
Lyondell, ARCO, its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including ARCO Chemical
(together, "ARCO Affiliates"), there can be no assurance that each of such
agreements, or the transactions provided for therein, has been effected on terms
at least as favorable to the Company as could have been obtained from
unaffiliated parties.
The terms and provisions of many of these initial agreements have subsequently
been modified or supplemented and additional or modified agreements,
arrangements and transactions will be determined through negotiation among the
Company and ARCO Affiliates, and it is possible that conflicts of interest will
be involved. As long as ARCO remains a 49.9 percent stockholder, future
contractual relations between the Company and ARCO Affiliates will be subject to
certain provisions of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation. See
"Development of Business". In addition, the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company has adopted a set of guidelines for the review of all
agreements entered into between the Company and ARCO Affiliates. These
guidelines include a provision that, at least annually, the Audit Committee will
review such agreements or the transactions provided for therein to assure that
such agreements are fair to the Company and its stockholders.
During 1995, Lyondell purchased certain of its feedstock requirements from ARCO
Affiliates and paid them fees for transportation of product and for other
services. For the year ended December 31, 1995, Lyondell paid ARCO Affiliates
approximately $28 million. During 1995, Lyondell sold products to and provided
services for ARCO Affiliates, including sales of propylene, MTBE, benzene,
ethylene and methanol to ARCO Chemical and crude oil resales and sales of lube
oil to other ARCO Affiliates. For the year ended December 31, 1995, Lyondell
received approximately $325 million from sales to and services for ARCO
Affiliates, of which $321 million represented sales to and services for ARCO
Chemical. See Note 8 of "NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS".
In connection with the ARCO Note Offering, the Company and ARCO entered into
agreements governing their ongoing relationships, including a Registration
Rights Agreement that provides ARCO with rights under certain circumstances to
compel the Company to file a registration statement with the SEC with respect to
all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock held by ARCO. At the same time,
ARCO announced its intention to vote its shares in proportion to the votes of
the non-ARCO stockholders, except under certain limited circumstances.
For a summary of agreements, arrangements and transactions among the Company,
ARCO Chemical and ARCO see "TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND ARCO", which is
included in the 1996 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference as
part of Item 13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY; PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
The Company uses numerous patents in its operations, many of which are licensed
from third parties, including ARCO. See Item 13 -- "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions". Although the Company's licenses from ARCO and others are
significant to its operations, the Company is not dependent upon any particular
patent, trade secret or the like, and it believes that the loss of any
individual patent, trade secret or similar proprietary right would not have a
material adverse effect on the operations of the Company. The Company submitted
several new patent applications during 1995 to protect new processes it
developed.
In 1992, the Company introduced ISOMPLUS, a new technology for producing low-
cost isobutylene by isomerizing normal butylenes. Isobutylene is a key
ingredient in MTBE, and management believes that ISOMPLUS will play an important
role in the next increments of capacity that the industry will need to supply
the demand for MTBE in reformulated gasoline. In an effort to accelerate
worldwide commercialization of Lyondell's butylene isomerization process,
Lyondell has commercialized the technology through a joint development and
licensing relationship with CDTECH, a leading supplier of ethers technologies
used in reformulated fuels production and has entered into licensing
arrangements with third parties. The arrangement with CDTECH is intended to
commercialize two processes, isomerization and etherification, to produce
blending agents for cleaner burning gasolines. During the first quarter of
1995, the ISOMPLUS unit at the Channelview Facility became
14
<PAGE>
operational and commercial production of isobutylene using the new technology
began. In connection with this project, the existing MTBE unit at the
Channelview Facility was expanded. Development efforts are continuing on similar
technology to produce isoamylene, a feedstock used to produce TAME, another
oxygenate used in the production of reformulated gasoline.
The Company also has product development efforts aimed at tailoring products to
meet specific customer needs, especially in such areas as resins, fibers,
adhesives and sealants. Lyondell's research and development efforts have
resulted in the invention of KromaLon(R), an enhanced polyolefin fiber for the
carpet market. This advancement in fiber technology enables the production of a
recyclable fiber with advanced coloring capabilities. In addition to the
inherent stain resistance of polypropylene, the new fiber is dyeable and
printable, providing advantages for commercial and residential carpets.
Recent polymers industry announcements relate to the development of metallocene,
or single-site, catalysts. Successful development and commercialization of
these catalysts are expected to result in enhanced polymer properties. The
Company has undertaken a world-wide technology search and is concentrating in-
house research in an effort to identify and develop single-site catalysts in
connection with the production of polyolefins resins. The Company has filed
patent applications in connection with its research and development efforts in
this area.
Included in the acquisition of the HDPE business from Occidental Chemical
Corporation, were rights to the ALATHON trademark. The ALATHON name is
recognized by polymers customers as a leading supplier of quality HDPE resins.
The Company uses numerous trademarks in its marketing operations, a portion of
which are licensed from third parties, including ARCO. The Company submitted
several new trademark applications during 1995 to protect product line names and
to foster its marketing position. The Company is not dependent upon any
particular trademark, and it believes the loss of any individual trademark would
not have a material adverse effect on its operations.
FINANCE MATTERS
The Company uses cash flow to enhance total return to stockholders. The
Company's financial goals include maintaining investment-grade debt ratings
while maintaining sufficient liquidity and debt capacity through all phases of
the industry cycle to provide for what it deems to be sufficient capability to
invest in attractive capital projects and possible external business
opportunities. The Company continues to have an interest in pursuing external
business opportunities with returns in excess of its cost of capital and near-
term positive cash flow that would allow it to increase downstream integration
or leverage its operating expertise and increase operating flexibility across a
larger olefins asset base. See "Development of Business" and "PETROCHEMICAL
SEGMENT -- Capital Program and Business Strategies".
In the near term, the next priority for cash flow after such investments is to
build liquidity and reduce debt in order to progress toward these financial
goals. The Company intends that excess cash flow above the amounts needed to
fund its capital projects, external business opportunities and appropriate
liquidity needs, would be returned to the stockholders. The Company views its
current dividend as sustainable for the foreseeable future and intends that any
future dividend decisions be based on maintaining a sustainable dividend level.
See Item 5 -- "Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters". Substantial changes in business conditions or new opportunities may
also change cash flow priorities.
LONG-TERM DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
As of December 31, 1995, the Company had $807 million of long-term debt
consisting of: (i) $150 million of notes due in 1999; (ii) $200 million of notes
due 1997 and 2002; (iii) $207 million of medium-term notes due from 1997 to
2005; and (iv) $250 million of borrowings under LCR's credit facilities that
mature in 2000. In addition, the Company has $150 million of debt maturing in
June 1996. In February 1996, the Company issued $300 million of new debt
consisting of $150 million of notes due 2006 and $150 million of debentures due
2026. The Company intends to use the proceeds of this debt offering to pay off
short and long-term debt maturing over the next several years.
The Notes due 1996 and 1999 and the medium-term notes contain provisions that
would allow the holders to require the Company to repurchase the debt upon the
occurrence of certain events combined with specified declines
15
<PAGE>
in public ratings ("Put Rights"). Events which may trigger the Put Rights
include, among other things, acquisitions by persons other than ARCO or the
Company of more than 20 percent of the Company's Common Stock, any merger or
transfer of substantially all of the Company's assets in connection with which
the Company's Common Stock is changed into or exchanged for cash, securities or
other property and payment of "special" dividends. See Item 5 -- "Market for
Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters". The foregoing
summary of the Put Rights is not intended to be complete and it is subject to,
and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the terms of the Indenture for
the Notes due 1996 and 1999 which has been filed as an exhibit to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989 and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Company Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility -- The Company has a five-year,
$400 million revolving credit facility ("Facility") with a group of banks that
terminates in June 2000. Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at either
the eurodollar, certificate of deposit or prime rates or based on a competitive
auction feature wherein the interest rate can be established by competitive bids
submitted by the sponsoring banks, all at the Company's option. The Facility is
available for working capital and general corporate purposes as needed and
contains covenants relating to dividend payments, debt incurrence, liens,
disposition of assets, mergers and consolidations, fixed charge and leverage
ratios and certain payments to LCR. The Company used a portion of the Facility
to fund the acquisition of the ALATHON HDPE business in 1995. The Company does
not believe that the covenants or the other terms of the Facility described
below are reasonably likely to materially affect or restrict the future
operation of the Company's business or its ability to pay dividends on its
Common Stock. At December 31, 1995, no amounts were outstanding under the
Facility.
The Facility contains restrictive covenants regarding the incurrence of
additional debt, the maintenance of certain fixed charge coverage and leverage
ratios and the making of contributions to LCR, as well as the payment of
dividends to the extent the Company's net income after December 31, 1993
generally does not exceed, over time, dividends declared or paid after that
date. The Facility's debt incurrence covenant restricts the incurrence by the
Company of additional debt, including debt under the Facility, unless,
immediately after giving effect to the additional borrowing, the ratio of
earnings before depreciation, amortization, interest and income taxes, to
interest expense exceeds the limits set forth in the Facility.
In addition to other customary events of default, the Facility provides that an
event of default will occur (i) if the Company fails to pay when due (whether by
scheduled maturity, acceleration or otherwise) an aggregate amount of
indebtedness or interest thereon (other than with respect to loans under the
Facility) in excess of $15 million, or (ii) if the Company is determined (upon
exhaustion of all appeals and expiration of all cure periods) to be in default
of a material obligation under the LCR Regulations. The foregoing summary of
the Facility is not intended to be complete and it is subject to, and qualified
in its entirety by reference to, the terms of the Facility which has been filed
as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference.
As of December 31, 1995, the Company also had uncommitted lines of credit
totaling $265 million with banks and other financial institutions. These
uncommitted lines of credit provide the Company with additional borrowing
flexibility and potentially more competitive interest rates. The Company can
borrow money on these uncommitted lines of credit on such terms as may be
mutually agreed upon at the time amounts are borrowed. The lines of credit can
be terminated by the lenders, in their sole discretion, on short notice. As of
December 31, 1995, the Company had $103 million outstanding under these
uncommitted lines of credit.
LCR Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility -- Effective May 5, 1995, LCR entered
into two credit facilities totaling $520 million. The first facility is a $70
million, 364 day revolving credit facility, which replaced LCR's existing $70
million revolving credit facility, that will be utilized for general business
purposes, including letters of credit, unrelated to the Upgrade Project. The
second facility is a $450 million, five year term credit facility that will be
used in connection with the Upgrade Project. Interest for the facilities is
based on prime or eurodollar rates at LCR's option. Prior to the completion of
the Upgrade Project, all financing costs related to the $450 million credit
facility will be funded by CITGO Petroleum Corporation, the minority owner of
LCR. The facilities contain covenants which require LCR to maintain a minimum
net worth which increases each year until 1998 and maintenance of certain
financial ratios defined in the agreements. The facilities also contain other
customary covenants which limit LCR's ability to modify certain significant
contracts, incur additional debt or liens, dispose of assets, make restricted
payments as defined in the agreements or merge or consolidate with other
entities. As of December 31, 1995, no amounts were outstanding under the $70
million revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 1995, a total of $250
million was outstanding under the five year term credit facility. The foregoing
summary of the facilities is not intended to be complete and is subject to, and
qualified in its
16
<PAGE>
entirety by reference to, the terms of the facilities, which have been filed as
exhibits to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 1995 and are incorporated herein by reference.
For a further discussion of the Company's long-term debt and financing
arrangements, see Item 7 -- "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations -- FINANCIAL CONDITION" and Note 11 of
"NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS".
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Lyondell's production facilities are generally required to have permits and
licenses regulating air emissions, discharges to water and generation, storage,
treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes. Companies such as Lyondell that are
permitted to treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste and maintain underground
storage tanks pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA")
also are required to meet certain financial responsibility requirements. The
Company believes that it has all permits and licenses generally necessary to
conduct its business or, where necessary, is applying for additional, amended or
modified permits and that it meets applicable financial responsibility
requirements.
The Company's policy is to be in compliance with all applicable environmental
laws. The Company also is committed to Responsible Care(R), a chemical industry
initiative to enhance the industry's responsible management of chemicals. The
Company (together with the industries in which it operates) is subject to
extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations concerning
emissions to the air, discharges onto land or waters and the generation,
handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste materials.
Some of these laws and regulations are subject to varying and conflicting
interpretations. In addition, the Company cannot accurately predict future
developments, such as increasingly strict requirements of environmental laws,
inspection and enforcement policies and compliance costs therefrom, which might
affect the handling, manufacture, use, emission or disposal of products, other
materials or hazardous and non-hazardous waste. In particular, the ultimate
effect of the Clean Air Act on the Company's operations will depend on how the
law is interpreted and implemented pursuant to regulations that are currently
being developed and on additional factors such as the evolution of environmental
control technologies. For example, in April 1994, new regulations relating to
emission standards for a large number of petrochemicals such as methanol,
butadiene and toluene, were announced by the EPA (the "SOCMI HON Regulations"),
although enforcement of these regulations has been challenged by industry
groups. Some risk of environmental costs and liabilities is inherent in
particular operations and products of the Company, as it is with other companies
engaged in similar businesses, and there is no assurance that material costs and
liabilities will not be incurred. In general, however, with respect to the
capital expenditures and risks described above, the Company does not expect that
it will be affected differentially from the rest of the domestic petrochemical
and refining industry.
In some cases, compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations can only be achieved by capital expenditures. In the years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1994, the Company spent approximately $35 million and $48
million, respectively, for environmentally related capital expenditures at
existing facilities. In 1996, the Company currently estimates that
environmentally related capital expenditures at existing facilities will be
approximately $39 million, including a total of approximately $6 million for
compliance with the SOCMI HON Regulations. The Company does not anticipate that
environmentally related capital expenditures at its facilities in 1997 will be
materially different than for 1996. The timing and amount of these expenditures
are subject to the regulatory and other uncertainties described above as well as
obtaining of the necessary permits and approvals. For periods beyond 1997,
additional environmentally related capital expenditures will be required,
although the Company cannot accurately predict the levels of such expenditures
at this time.
The Refinery contains on-site solid-waste landfills which were used in the past
to dispose of waste generated at this facility. It is anticipated that
corrective measures will be necessary to comply with federal and state
requirements with respect to this facility. In addition, the Company negotiated
an order with the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission ("TNRCC") for
assessment and remediation of groundwater and soil contamination at the
Refinery. The Company is also responsible for a portion of the remediation of
certain off-site waste disposal facilities. The Company's policy is to accrue
remediation expenses when it is probable that such efforts will be required and
the related expenses can be reasonably estimated. Estimated costs for future
environmental compliance and remediation are necessarily imprecise due to such
factors as the continuing evolution of environmental laws and regulatory
requirements, the availability and application of technology, the identification
17
<PAGE>
of presently unknown remediation sites and the allocation of costs among the
responsible parties under applicable statutes. The Company has reserved an
amount (without regard to potential insurance recoveries or other third party
reimbursements) it believes to be sufficient to cover current estimates of the
cost for remedial measures at its manufacturing facilities and off-site waste
disposal facilities based upon its interpretation of current environmental
standards. In the opinion of management, there is no material range of loss in
excess of the amount recorded. Based on the establishment of such reserves, and
the status of discussions with regulatory agencies described in this paragraph,
and although the reserves are subject to increase, the Company does not
anticipate any material adverse effect upon its financial statements or
competitive position as a result of compliance with the laws and regulations
described in this or the preceding paragraphs. In the fourth quarter of 1992,
the Refinery underwent an EPA multi-media inspection. The Company is currently
in discussions with the EPA to resolve any matters that may have been raised as
a result of the inspection. See also Item 3 -- "Legal Proceedings -- Claims
Relating To Waste Disposal Sites", "Other Matters" and Item 7 -- "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
GENERAL
In connection with the transfer of assets and liabilities from ARCO to Lyondell,
Lyondell agreed to assume certain liabilities arising out of the operation of
the Company's integrated petrochemical and petroleum processing business prior
to July 1, 1988. At that time, the Company and ARCO entered into an agreement
("Cross-Indemnity Agreement") whereby the Company agreed to defend and indemnify
ARCO against certain uninsured claims and liabilities which ARCO may incur
relating to the operation of the business of the Company prior to July 1, 1988,
including liabilities which may arise out of certain of the legal proceedings
described in this Item 3. See Item 13 -- "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions". Prior to November 20, 1990, ARCO's insurance carriers had
assumed the defense of most of the lawsuits described in this Item 3. Since
that date, ARCO's insurance carriers have refused to advance defense costs in
those lawsuits relating to certain of the waste disposal sites. See "Claims
Relating To Waste Disposal Sites -- ARCO Insurance Litigation".
In addition to the proceedings specifically described in this Item 3, ARCO, the
Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in other suits, some of which are
not covered by insurance. Many of these additional suits involve smaller
amounts than the matters described herein, or make no specific claim for relief.
Although final determination of legal liability and the resulting financial
impact with respect to the litigation described in this Item 3, as well as the
other litigation affecting the Company, cannot be ascertained with any degree of
certainty, the Company does not believe that any ultimate uninsured liability
resulting from the legal proceedings in which it currently is involved (directly
or indirectly) will individually, or in the aggregate, have a material adverse
effect on the business or financial statements of the Company; however the
adverse resolution in any reporting period of one or more of the matters
discussed in this note could have a material impact on the Company's results of
operations for that period. See Note 18 of "NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS".
Although Lyondell is involved in numerous and varied legal proceedings, a
significant portion of its litigation arises in three contexts: (1) claims for
personal injury or death allegedly arising out of exposure to the Company's
products; (2) claims for personal injury or death, and/or property damage
allegedly arising out of the generation and disposal of chemical wastes at
"Superfund" and other waste disposal sites; and (3) claims for personal injury
and/or property damage and air and noise pollution allegedly arising out of the
operation of the Company's facilities. The following sections of this Item 3
describe these types of pending proceedings. Lyondell (either directly or
through ARCO as its indemnitee) is the real party at interest in these
proceedings.
CLAIMS RELATED TO COMPANY PRODUCTS
ARCO and the Company are involved in numerous suits arising in whole or in part
from the operation of the Company's petrochemical and petroleum processing
businesses and the assets related thereto in which the plaintiffs allege damages
arising from exposure to allegedly toxic chemical products, such as benzene and
butadiene. Plaintiffs in these cases usually worked at a manufacturing facility
as employees of one of Lyondell's customers, were employees of the Company's
contractors, or were employees of companies involved in the transportation of
the Company's products to its customers. These suits allege toxic effects of
exposure to chemicals sold in the ordinary course of business to third parties
by various industrial concerns, including ARCO or the Company, or
18
<PAGE>
allege toxic chemical exposures at the Company's manufacturing facilities.
Issues common to these cases include: (1) whether the plaintiff can identify a
specific product to which he was allegedly exposed; (2) whether the Company
supplied the identified product to which plaintiff claims he was exposed; (3)
whether the plaintiff has a medical condition which, based upon competent
scientific and medical evidence, is causally related to the identified product;
(4) whether, and under what conditions, the plaintiff was exposed to the
identified product; and (5) if the plaintiff was exposed, whether the Company
has any legal defenses to the plaintiff's claims and whether there are other
parties or defendants to whom the Company can turn for contribution or
indemnification. The Company believes that it has always followed a policy of
not only complying with all mandated standards related to product warnings and
exposure levels but also of complying with Company specific standards that were
more strict than those imposed by the law. As a result, the Company believes
that it has a basis to avail itself of legal defenses against claims regarding
its products due to exposures by employees and by claims of exposures from third
parties to whom the Company sold its products.
The vast majority of chemical exposure cases name a large number of industrial
concerns, in addition to the Company, as defendants and are at various stages of
discovery. Although the Company does not believe that the pending chemical
exposure cases will have a material adverse effect on its business or financial
statements, it is difficult to determine the potential outcome of this type of
case. The majority of the plaintiffs in chemical exposure legal proceedings
request relief in the form of unspecified monetary damages. Furthermore, when
specific amounts are requested they often bear no objective relation to the
merits of the case. It is possible that if one or more of the presently pending
chemical exposure cases were resolved against ARCO or the Company, the resulting
damage award could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations
for any reporting period, without giving effect to contribution or
indemnification obligations of co-defendants or others, or to the effect of any
insurance coverage that may be available to offset the effects of any such
award.
CLAIMS RELATING TO WASTE DISPOSAL SITES
Wastes generated from products produced by facilities transferred from ARCO and
now owned by the Company have, from time to time, been disposed of at third-
party landfills. Two of these facilities, known as the "French Ltd." and the
"Brio" sites, both of which are located near Houston, Texas, have been
classified as "Superfund" sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"). The EPA has named many
potentially responsible parties ("PRPs") at each site from whom wastes were
allegedly received. Based on the current law, the Company does not believe that
its obligation to ARCO related to ARCO's share of clean-up costs at either of
these sites will result in a liability that will have, individually or in the
aggregate, a material adverse effect on the business or financial statements of
the Company. It is possible, however, that the Company may be involved in
future CERCLA and comparable state law investigations and clean-ups. Although
the Superfund law was scheduled for reauthorization during 1995, no agreement
was reached and the Company is not able to determine with specificity what the
impact of a revised Superfund law would be on the Company.
French Ltd. Site Remediation -- At the French Ltd. site, ARCO and the other PRPs
have entered into a settlement agreement relating to the allocation of clean-up
costs. The EPA approved the clean-up plan and a Consent Decree was entered in
the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Texas in the first
quarter of 1990. An amendment to the Consent Decree relating to natural
resource damages has been negotiated and submitted to the court for approval.
The remediation work is expected to be completed in 1996. The Company believes
that its share of clean-up costs (as allocated pursuant to the Cross-Indemnity
Agreement) will be no more than five percent of total costs recovered without
giving effect to any insurance coverage which may be available to offset these
costs. The total costs associated with the Consent Decree are currently expected
to be approximately $90 million and the Company's total costs to date have been
approximately $3.4 million and should not exceed five percent of the total cost.
French Ltd. Site Litigation -- Approximately 2,500 plaintiffs have made claims
related to wastes in the French Ltd. site. In each of these cases, ARCO is one
of many defendants. These suits generally allege that unspecified chemical
waste sent to the site by the defendants caused a decrease in property value, a
decrease in plaintiffs' ability to enjoy their property, and unspecified adverse
effects on plaintiffs' health. Although some of the lawsuits request relief in
the form of unspecified monetary damages, the aggregate amount of actual damages
sought in those cases where damages are specified exceeds $5 billion. The
aggregate amount of punitive damages sought in those cases where damages are
specified exceeds $20 billion. In December 1992, after mediation, ARCO, along
19
<PAGE>
with several other defendants, entered into a preliminary agreement to settle
claims of approximately 2,200 plaintiffs. The remaining claims are in pretrial
discovery. The Company's obligation, if any, under the Cross-Indemnity
Agreement, to reimburse ARCO for a portion of its defense costs and settlements
related to the French Ltd. site has not been determined.
Brio Site Remediation -- At the Brio site, a definitive agreement allocating
these remedial costs among ARCO and the other PRPs was reached. The EPA
approved the plan and a Consent Decree between the Department of Justice and a
group of PRPs (including ARCO on behalf of its former divisions and
subsidiaries) was entered in Federal District Court for the Southern District of
Texas, in April 1991. The total clean-up cost under the original consent decree
is currently estimated to be approximately $60 million. Various objections have
been raised with respect to the provisions of the original remediation plan, and
the EPA and the PRP's have agreed to fund a new feasibility study to evaluate
alternatives for remediation. The Company believes that its share of the clean-
up costs (as allocated pursuant to the Cross-Indemnity Agreement) will be no
more than one percent of total costs without giving effect to any insurance
coverage which may be available to offset these costs.
Brio Site Litigation -- There currently are eight separate pending legal
proceedings filed against ARCO or its affiliates and numerous others in
connection with the Brio site. In these proceedings, there are approximately
600 plaintiffs, many of whom are suing in their capacity as next friend of minor
children. In each of these cases, ARCO is one of many defendants. Plaintiffs
allege personal injury as a result of exposure to various substances that were
disposed of or stored at the Brio site. These suits generally allege that
defendants were negligent in sending chemical substances to the site and also
contain allegations of nuisance and strict liability. The suits involve: a
school district alleging damages as a result of the closing of an elementary
school; employees of the various entities who operated the refining and
reprocessing facilities at the Brio site; and other plaintiffs. All of the
lawsuits request relief in the form of unspecified compensatory and exemplary
damages. These suits are in pretrial discovery. The Company's obligation, if
any, under the Cross-Indemnity Agreement, to reimburse ARCO for a portion of its
defense costs and settlements related to the Brio site has not been determined.
ARCO (or an affiliate) is the named defendant in the above proceedings. Under
the provisions of the Cross-Indemnity Agreement, Lyondell is not obligated to
indemnify ARCO for costs arising out of this litigation for which ARCO is
insured. Although ARCO is currently litigating the nature and extent of its
coverage with its insurance carriers (see "ARCO Insurance Litigation"), Lyondell
believes that the ultimate resolution of the above described lawsuits, ARCO's
insurance litigation and related issues will not result in any material
obligation on the part of Lyondell to ARCO with respect to the Brio and the
French Ltd. sites.
Other Waste Disposal Site Litigation -- The Company and ARCO are named
defendants in other waste disposal site litigation, including three presently
pending lawsuits filed on behalf of 73 plaintiffs in the state district court in
Galveston County, Texas involving the alleged release of toxic and hazardous
substances from the Hall's Bayou Ranch. LCR sends and, prior to July 1, 1993,
Lyondell and its predecessor, ARCO, sent, surface water runoff and process waste
water from the Refinery to Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority ("GCWDA"). Prior
to September, 1994, a portion of the solids output from GCWDA was sent for
storage to the Hall's Bayou Ranch site. Plaintiffs claim personal injury,
diminution of property value and loss of use and enjoyment of the property.
They are seeking $7 billion in actual damages and $28 billion in punitive
damages. In March 1994, the Company and ARCO entered a settlement agreement to
resolve these proceedings with all but seven of the plaintiffs. The remaining
plaintiffs' actions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business or financial statements.
ARCO Insurance Litigation -- On November 21, 1990, ARCO filed suit against
certain of its insurers with respect to insurance policies in effect at times
during past years. This litigation involves claims for reimbursement of defense
costs and environmental expenses incurred by ARCO in connection with ARCO's
activities at sites and locations throughout the United States. ARCO's insurers
had been participating in the defense of the Company and ARCO for the Mont
Belvieu proceedings (see "Claims Related To Company Operations -- Mont Belvieu
Litigation") as well as the litigation involving the French Ltd. and the Brio
sites; however, subsequent to the filing of ARCO's lawsuit, the insurers refused
to advance defense costs for these proceedings (and certain other proceedings
relating to the Company's products) until the coverage dispute has been
resolved. ARCO is currently paying the defense costs in the Mont Belvieu
proceedings, as well as the French Ltd. and Brio Site litigation, pending the
resolution of the coverage dispute. ARCO has reported that it has settled with
several of the insurance
20
<PAGE>
carrier defendants and that it expects the trial with the remainder of the
defendants will begin in 1996.
CLAIMS RELATED TO COMPANY OPERATIONS
Mont Belvieu Litigation -- Several organizations and groups of citizens who own
property in the vicinity of Mont Belvieu, Texas, have instituted suits for
monetary damages and injunctive relief against ARCO and others who own
underground storage and transportation facilities in the city of Mont Belvieu.
In September 1980, Warren Petroleum Company ("Warren") experienced a leak in one
of its underground hydrocarbon storage wells in Mont Belvieu. Three lawsuits
were filed by approximately 120 plaintiffs, naming Warren, ARCO and other
companies with operations in Mont Belvieu as defendants. These plaintiffs
claimed property damage, and, in some instances, personal injuries allegedly
resulting from storage operations in Mont Belvieu. In February 1986, ARCO was
granted a directed verdict as to all of the claims of the plaintiffs in the
first of the three lawsuits to be tried which had the effect of dismissing all
the pending claims without the ability to refile. Thereafter, the plaintiffs in
the two remaining cases dropped their claims against ARCO although ARCO remains
in these two cases as a result of cross claims for contribution filed by other
defendants. These suits have not been set for trial.
In 1986, a number of companies that operated facilities in Mont Belvieu,
including ARCO, instituted a program to purchase certain properties in Mont
Belvieu in order to give persons within a certain area the opportunity to move,
if they so desired. A number of residents and litigants participated in the
program. The implementation of the purchase program led to the filing of a new
set of lawsuits filed by persons outside the area designated by the purchase
program. There were two separate legal proceedings which resulted from eight
lawsuits filed in state and federal court against ARCO, the Company, and a
number of other companies that operate facilities in Mont Belvieu. The
defendants prevailed in all of these proceedings and no suits remain pending.
ARCO is paying all defense costs in all of the Mont Belvieu litigation and the
Company does not expect that a claim for reimbursement will be made under the
Cross-Indemnity Agreement.
OTHER MATTERS
In July 1994, the Company reported results of an independent investigation
conducted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors regarding the
compliance status of two process waste water streams under the applicable
Benzene National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants ("NESHAPS")
regulations and certain issues raised by an employee. Noncompliance with the
Benzene NESHAPS regulations and the related reporting requirements can result in
civil penalties and, under certain circumstances, substantial civil and,
potentially, criminal penalties. The Company received a notice of violation
from the TNRCC regarding the two streams and paid a fine of $10,200. In
addition, the Company incurred approximately $2 million in capital costs in
connection with these waste water streams to achieve on-going compliance with
the Benzene NESHAPS regulations. Although the Criminal Enforcement Division of
the EPA is conducting a formal investigation, the Company does not believe that
any aspects of the matters described above will subject the Company to criminal
liability or have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or
financial statements.
In addition to the matters reported in this Item 3, from time to time the
Company receives notices from federal, state or local governmental entities of
alleged violations of environmental laws and regulations pertaining to, among
other things, the disposal, emission and storage of chemical and petroleum
substances, including hazardous wastes. Although the Company has not been the
subject of significant penalties to date, such alleged violations may become the
subject of enforcement actions or other legal proceedings and may (individually
or in the aggregate) involve monetary sanctions of $100,000 or more (exclusive
of interest and costs). In the opinion of management, there is no material
range of loss in excess of the amount recorded.
21
<PAGE>
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of 1995.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Set forth below are the executive officers of Registrant(*) as of March 1, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME, AGE AND PRESENT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE DURING PAST
POSITION WITH LYONDELL FIVE YEARS AND PERIOD SERVED AS OFFICER(S)
- --------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
John R. Beard, 43.......... Mr. Beard became Vice President, Petrochemical
Vice President, Manufacturing on May 1, 1995. Previously, Mr.
Petrochemical Manufacturing Beard served as Vice President, Quality, Supply
and Planning from July 1993 to May 1995 and from
April 1992 to July 1993, he served as Vice
President, Planning and Evaluations. He served as
the Site Manager of Lyondell's Houston Refinery
from 1988 until April 1992. From 1985 until 1988,
he served in management assignments in
evaluations, marketing and manufacturing. Prior to
1985, he served in various management positions
for ARCO Products Company and the ARCO Chemical
Division.
Clifton B. Currin, Jr., 41. Mr. Currin became Vice President, Petrochemicals
Vice President, Business Management on May 1, 1995. Mr. Currin
Petrochemicals Business served as Vice President, Olefins, from October
Management 1994 to May 1995, with primary responsibility for
olefins marketing. Mr. Currin was previously
commercial manager for light olefins. From 1985
until 1990 he served in assignments in evaluations
and marketing. Prior to 1985 he served in various
engineering, health, safety and environmental,
manufacturing and evaluations positions for ARCO
Products Company.
Bob G. Gower, 58........... Mr. Gower was elected Chairman of the Board of
Chairman of the Board and Directors of the Company on August 31, 1994. Mr.
Chief Executive Officer Gower has served as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company since October 24, 1988 and has been a
Director of the Company since June 27, 1988. He
was President of Lyondell and its predecessor, the
Lyondell Division, from the formation of the
Lyondell Division in April 1985 until August 31,
1994. Prior thereto, Mr. Gower served in various
positions with ARCO, including Senior Vice
President of ARCO.
</TABLE>
22
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME, AGE AND PRESENT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE DURING PAST
POSITION WITH LYONDELL FIVE YEARS AND PERIOD SERVED AS OFFICER(S)
- --------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Richard W. Park, 56........ Mr. Park was elected Vice President, Human
Vice President, Resources on June 27, 1988. From February 1987 to
Human Resources June 1988 he served as Vice President of Employee
Relations of the Lyondell Division. From 1985 to
1987 he served as Manager of Personnel for the
Specialty Chemicals and International Units of the
ARCO Chemical Division. Prior to 1985 he held
other employee relations positions with divisions
of ARCO.
Jeffrey R. Pendergraft, 47. Mr. Pendergraft was named Senior Vice President on
Senior Vice President, May 6, 1993. Mr. Pendergraft was elected Vice
General Counsel and President and General Counsel on June 27, 1988 and
Secretary Secretary on October 24, 1988. From September
1985 to June 1988, he served as General Attorney
of the Lyondell Division. Prior thereto, he
served as an attorney for various operating
divisions and corporate units of ARCO at
increasing levels of responsibility.
W. Norman Phillips, Jr., 41 Mr. Phillips became Vice President, Petrochemical
Vice President, Sales and Marketing on May 1, 1995. Mr. Phillips
Petrochemical Sales and was Vice President, Channelview Operations from
Marketing May 1993 to May 1995 and Site Manager of
Channelview Operations from May 1992 until May
1993. He held the position of Manager, Planning
from August 1991 until May 1992. Prior to August
1991, he served in various positions in
manufacturing and marketing for ARCO and Lyondell,
including Sales Manager in the Petroleum Products
Marketing Department from September 1987 until
August 1991.
Joseph M. Putz, 55......... Mr. Putz was elected Vice President and Controller
Vice President on October 24, 1988. Previously he was Vice
and Controller President, Control and Administration of Lyondell,
and its predecessor, the Lyondell Division, from
June 1987 to October 1988. From 1986 to 1987 he
served as Director, Internal Control of ARCO.
From 1985 to 1986 he served as Manager of Special
Projects for ARCO. Prior to 1985, he held various
financial positions with divisions of ARCO.
</TABLE>
23
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME, AGE AND PRESENT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE DURING PAST
POSITION WITH LYONDELL FIVE YEARS AND PERIOD SERVED AS OFFICER(S)
- --------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Dan F. Smith, 49........... Mr. Smith was elected President of the Company on
President, August 31, 1994 and has been Chief Operating
Chief Operating Officer Officer since May 1993. Previously, Mr. Smith was
and Director Executive Vice President from May 1993 to August
1994. Mr. Smith was elected a Director of the
Company on October 24, 1988. He served as Vice
President Corporate Planning of ARCO from October
1991 until May 1993. He previously served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company from October 1988 to
October 1991 and as Senior Vice President of
Manufacturing of Lyondell, and its predecessor,
the Lyondell Division, from June 1986 to October
1988. From August 1985 to June 1986, Mr. Smith
served as Vice President of Manufacturing for the
Lyondell Division. He joined the Lyondell
division in April 1985 as Vice President, Control
and Administration. Prior to 1985, he served in
various financial, planning and manufacturing
management positions with ARCO.
Debra L. Starnes, 43....... Ms. Starnes became Senior Vice President, Polymers
Senior Vice President, on May 1, 1995 with the responsibility for the
Polymers entire polymers organization. She was named a
Senior Vice President on October 21, 1994. Ms.
Starnes previously served as Vice President,
Petrochemicals Business Management and Marketing
from July 1, 1993. From May 1992 to July 1993 she
served as Vice President, Petrochemicals Business
Management. She served as Vice President,
Corporate Planning from September 1991 until May
1992. From January 1989 to September 1991, she
served as Director, Planning. Prior to 1989, she
held various manufacturing, marketing and planning
positions with ARCO and Lyondell.
Russell S. Young, 47....... Mr. Young was elected Senior Vice President, Chief
Senior Vice President, Financial Officer and Treasurer on May 7, 1992.
Chief Financial Officer He held the position of Vice President and
and Treasurer Treasurer from November 1988 until May 1992. Mr.
Young served as Controller of the ARCO Products
Division from September 1986 to January 1989.
Prior to September 1986 he served in various
finance positions for ARCO including Assistant
Treasurer.
</TABLE>
* The By-Laws of the Company provide that each officer shall hold office until
the officer's successor is elected or appointed and qualified or until the
officer's death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors.
24
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The authorized capital stock of the Company currently consists of 250,000,000
shares of Common Stock, par value $1 per share and 80,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $.01 per share. The following summary description of
the capital stock of the Company is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and the Amended and Restated By-
Laws of the Company, as amended, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
COMMON STOCK
The Company is currently authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of Common Stock,
of which 80,000,000 shares of Common Stock are outstanding at the date hereof.
Holders of Common Stock ("Stockholders") are entitled (i) to receive such
dividends as may from time to time be declared by the Board of Directors of the
Company; (ii) to one vote per share on all matters on which the Stockholders are
entitled to vote; (iii) to act by written consent in lieu of voting at a meeting
of Stockholders; and (iv) to share ratably in all assets of the Company
available for distribution to the Stockholders, in the event of liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the Company. For additional information regarding
the Company's dividend policy, see Item 5 -- "Market for Registrant's Common
Equity and Related Stockholder Matters". The holders of a majority of the
shares of Common Stock represented at a meeting can elect all of the directors.
See Item 12 -- "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management"
which is incorporated herein by reference.
Shares of Common Stock are not liable to further calls or assessments by the
Company for any liabilities of the Company that may be imposed on its
Stockholders under the laws of the State of Delaware, the state of incorporation
of the Company. There are no preemptive rights for the Common Stock in the
Certificate of Incorporation.
The Transfer Agent, Registrar and Dividend Disbursing Agent for the Common Stock
is The Bank of New York.
PREFERRED STOCK
In July 1994, the Stockholders approved an amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company authorizing the issuance of up to 80,000,000 shares
of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share. Pursuant to the terms of the
amendment, the Board will be able to specify the precise characteristics of the
Preferred Stock to be issued, in light of current market conditions and the
nature of specific transactions, and will not be required to solicit further
authorization from Stockholders for any specific issue of Preferred Stock. The
Board of Directors has no present intention to issue any series of Preferred
Stock.
The Board of Directors has adopted a policy providing that no future issuance of
Preferred Stock will be effected without Stockholder approval unless the Board
of Directors (whose decision shall be conclusive) determines in good faith (i)
that such issuance is primarily for the purpose of facilitating a financing, an
acquisition or another proper corporate objective or transaction, and (ii) that
any anti-takeover effects of such issuance are not the Company's primary purpose
for effecting such issuance. The Board of Directors will not amend or revoke
this policy without giving written notice to the holders of all outstanding
shares of the Company's stock; however, no such amendment or revocation will be
effective, without Stockholder approval, to permit a subsequent issuance of
Preferred Stock for the primary purpose of obstructing a takeover of the Company
by any person who has, prior to such written notice to stockholders, notified
the Board of Directors of such person's desire to pursue a takeover of the
Company.
RIGHTS TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK
On December 8, 1995, the Board of Directors of Lyondell declared a dividend of
one right ("Right") for each outstanding share of the Company's Common Stock,
par value $1.00 per share, to stockholders of record at the close of business on
December 20, 1995. Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from
the Company one share of Common Stock at a purchase price of $80 per share of
Common Stock, subject to adjustment (the "Purchase Price"). The description and
terms of the Rights are set forth in a Rights Agreement dated as of
25
<PAGE>
December 8, 1995 as it may from time to time be supplemented or amended (the
"Rights Agreement") between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Rights
Agent.
Initially, the Rights will be attached to all certificates representing
outstanding shares of Common Stock, and no separate certificates for the Rights
("Rights Certificates") will be distributed. The Rights will separate from the
Common Stock and a "Distribution Date" will occur, with certain exceptions, upon
the earlier of (i) ten days following a public announcement of the existence of
an "Acquiring Person" (the date of the announcement being the "Stock Acquisition
Date"), or (ii) ten business days following the commencement of a tender offer
or exchange offer that would result in a person's becoming an Acquiring Person.
An "Acquiring Person" is any person or group of affiliated or associated persons
that has acquired or obtained the right to acquire beneficial ownership of 15%
or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, except that ARCO will not be
or become an Acquiring Person unless and until such time as ARCO or any person
affiliated or associated with ARCO acquires or becomes the beneficial owner of
(or ARCO becomes affiliated or associated with any person who, collectively with
ARCO, is the beneficial owner of) more than the lesser of (i) 1,000,000 shares
of Common Stock in addition to those ARCO beneficially owned as of December 8,
1995 (or in addition to any lesser number of shares ARCO beneficially owns from
time to time thereafter) and (ii) one share less than 50% of the shares of
Common Stock outstanding at any time. In certain circumstances prior to the
time a person has become an Acquiring Person, the Distribution Date may be
deferred by the Board of Directors. Certain inadvertent acquisitions will not
result in a person's becoming an Acquiring Person if the person promptly divests
itself of sufficient Common Stock. Until the Distribution Date, (a) the Rights
will be evidenced by the Common Stock certificates (together with this Summary
of Rights or bearing the notation referred to below) and will be transferred
with and only with such Common Stock certificates, (b) new Common Stock
certificates issued after December 20, 1995 will contain a notation
incorporating the Rights Agreement by reference and (c) the surrender for
transfer of any certificate for Common Stock (with or without a copy of this
Summary of Rights) will also constitute the transfer of the Rights associated
with the Common Stock represented by such certificate. The Rights are not
exercisable until the Distribution Date and will expire at the close of business
on December 8, 2005, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company as
described below.
In the event (a "Flip-In Event") that a person becomes an Acquiring Person
(except pursuant to a tender or exchange offer for all outstanding shares of
Common Stock at a price and on terms that a majority of the independent
directors of the Company determines to be fair to and otherwise in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders (a "Permitted Offer")), each
holder of a Right will thereafter have the right to receive, upon exercise of
such Right, a number of shares of Common Stock (or, in certain circumstances,
cash, property or other securities of the Company) having a Current Market Price
(as defined in the Rights Agreement) equal to two times the exercise price of
the Right. Notwithstanding the foregoing, following the occurrence of any Flip-
In Event, all Rights that are, or (under certain circumstances specified in the
Rights Agreement) were, beneficially owned by or transferred to such Acquiring
Person (or by certain related parties) will be null and void in the
circumstances set forth in the Rights Agreement.
In the event (a "Flip-Over Event") that, at any time from and after the time an
Acquiring Person becomes such, (i) the Company is acquired in a merger or other
business combination transaction (other than certain mergers that follow a
Permitted Offer), or (ii) 50% or more of the Company's assets or earning power
is sold or transferred, each holder of a Right (except Rights owned by such
Acquiring Person or certain related parties) shall thereafter have the right to
receive, upon exercise, a number of shares of common stock of the acquiring
company having a Current Market Price equal to two times the exercise price of
the Right.
At any time until the time a person becomes an Acquiring Person, the Company may
redeem the Rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $.0005 per Right,
payable, at the option of the Company, in cash, shares of Common Stock or such
other consideration as the Board of Directors may determine. At any time after
the occurrence of a Flip-In Event and prior to the occurrence of a Flip-Over
Event or a person becoming the beneficial owner of 50% or more of the shares of
Common Stock then outstanding, the Company may exchange the Rights (other than
Rights owned by an Acquiring Person or an affiliate or an associate of an
Acquiring Person, which will have become void), in whole or in part, at an
exchange ratio of one share of Common Stock, and/or other equity securities
deemed to have the same value as one share of Common Stock, per Right, subject
to adjustment.
Until a Right is exercised, the holder thereof, as such, will have no rights as
a stockholder of the Company, including, without limitation, the right to vote
or to receive dividends. While the distribution of the Rights should
26
<PAGE>
not be taxable to stockholders or to the Company, stockholders may, depending
upon the circumstances, recognize taxable income in the event that the Rights
become exercisable for Common Stock (or other consideration) of the Company or
for the common stock of the acquiring company as set forth above or are
exchanged as provided in the preceding paragraph.
The Purchase Price payable, and the number of shares of Common Stock or other
securities or property issuable, upon exercise of the Rights are subject to
adjustment from time to time to prevent dilution (i) in the event of a stock
dividend on, or a subdivision, combination or reclassification of, the Common
Stock, (ii) if holders of the Common Stock are granted certain rights or
warrants to subscribe for Common Stock or securities convertible into Common
Stock at less than the current market price of the Common Stock, or (iii) upon
the distribution to holders of the Common Stock of evidences of indebtedness or
assets (excluding regular quarterly cash dividends) or of subscription rights or
warrants (other than those referred to above).
Other than the redemption price, any of the provisions of the Rights Agreement
may be amended by the Board of Directors of the Company as long as the Rights
are redeemable. Thereafter, the provisions of the Rights Agreement (other than
the Redemption Price) may be amended by the Board of Directors in order to cure
any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency, to make changes that do not materially
adversely affect the interests of holders of Rights (excluding the interests of
any Acquiring Person), or to shorten or lengthen any time period under the
Rights Agreement; provided, however, that no amendment to lengthen the time
period governing redemption or amendment shall be made at such time as the
Rights are not redeemable.
The Rights have certain antitakeover effects. The Rights will cause substantial
dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire the Company on terms not
approved by its Board of Directors, except pursuant to an offer conditioned on a
substantial number of Rights being acquired. The Rights should not interfere
with any merger or other business combination approved by the Board of Directors
at a time when the Rights are redeemable.
A copy of the Rights Agreement is filed as an exhibit hereto. This summary
description of the Rights is qualified in its entirety by reference hereto.
27
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. ARCO has advised the
Company that, as of March 1, 1996, ARCO owned 39,921,400 shares of the Common
Stock, which represented 49.9 percent of the outstanding shares.
The reported high and low sale prices of the Common Stock on the New York Stock
Exchange (New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape) for each quarter from January
1, 1994 through December 31, 1995, inclusive, were as set forth below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERIOD HIGH LOW
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
1994:
First Quarter 23-7/8 20-5/8
Second Quarter 27 21-1/4
Third Quarter 32-7/8 23-5/8
Fourth Quarter 31-1/8 23
1995:
First Quarter 26-3/4 21-5/8
Second Quarter 26-3/4 22-5/8
Third Quarter 29-1/8 25-1/2
Fourth Quarter 26-1/4 21-1/8
</TABLE>
On March 1, 1996 the closing price of the Common Stock was $26-3/4, and there
were approximately 2,500 holders of record of the Common Stock.
During the last two years, Lyondell has declared per share quarterly cash
dividends (which were paid in the subsequent quarter) as follows.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1994.. $.225 $.225 $.225 $.225
1995.. $.225 $.225 $.225 $.225
</TABLE>
The declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. The future declaration and payment of dividends and the amount
thereof will be dependent upon the Company's results of operations, financial
condition, cash position and requirements, investment opportunities, future
prospects and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. Subject
to these considerations and to the legal considerations discussed in the
following paragraph, the Company currently intends to distribute to its
Stockholders cash dividends on its Common Stock at a quarterly rate of $.225 per
share.
In order to declare and pay dividends in the future, the Board of Directors will
have to make the determination that for purposes of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware ("Delaware Law") there is a sufficient amount of
surplus (the amount by which its assets exceed its liabilities and capital) at
that time or sufficient net profits. In determining the amount of surplus of
the Company for purposes of Delaware Law, the Company's assets, including the
stock of any of its subsidiaries, may be valued by the Board of Directors at
their current market value. In connection with each dividend declaration, the
Board of Directors makes a determination that, based upon its familiarity with
the Company's business, prospects and financial condition, the Company's recent
earnings history and forecast, an appraisal of the Company's assets and
discussions with the Company's executive officers, attorneys and accountants,
the dividend is a permitted dividend under Delaware Law.
As detailed herein, certain of the Company's debt instruments contain provisions
that generally provide that the holders of such debt may, under certain limited
circumstances, require the Company to repurchase the debt ("Put Rights"). In
addition to the occurrences described herein, the Put Rights may be triggered
by the making of
28
<PAGE>
certain unearned distributions to Stockholders, other than regular dividends,
that are followed by a specified decline in public ratings on such debt. See
"FINANCE MATTERS -- Long Term Debt and Financing Arrangements". Regular
dividends are those quarterly cash dividends determined in good faith by the
Board of Directors (whose determination is conclusive) to be appropriate in
light of the Company's results of operations and capable of being sustained.
The determinations described in the paragraphs above were made prior to the
declaration of $.225 per share dividend paid on March 15, 1996.
The Company's $400 million Facility also could limit the Company's ability to
pay dividends under certain circumstances. See Items 1 and 2 -- "Business and
Properties -- FINANCE MATTERS".
During 1995, the Company paid $72 million in dividends. All regular dividend
payments in 1995 represent taxable income.
The operation of certain of the Company's employee benefit plans may result in
the issuance of Common Stock upon the exercise of options granted to employees
of the Company, including its officers. Although the terms of these plans
provide that additional shares may be issued to satisfy the Company's
obligations under the options, the Company generally intends to cause Common
Stock to be repurchased in the market in order to satisfy these obligations.
29
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial information for the Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE ----------------------------------------
AMOUNTS 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
- ---------------------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and other operating revenues $4,936 $3,857 $3,850 $4,809 $5,735
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting changes 389 223 4 26 222
Net income (*) 389 223 26 16 222
Earnings per share before cumulative
effect of accounting changes 4.86 2.78 .06 .32 2.78
Earnings per share 4.86 2.78 .33 .20 2.78
Dividends per share .90 .90 1.35 1.80 1.75
Total assets 2,606 1,663 1,231 1,215 1,479
Capitalized lease obligations, less - - - - - - - - 156
current portion
Long-term debt, less current portion 807 707 717 725 554
</TABLE>
(*) The 1993 amount includes an increase in net income from the cumulative
effect of an accounting change for turnarounds of $22 million, or $.27 per
share. See Note 2 of "NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS." The 1992
amount includes a net decrease in net income of $10 million, or $.12 per
share, related to the cumulative effect of accounting changes for
postretirement benefits other than pensions and income taxes.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
Lyondell Petrochemical Company ("Company" or "Lyondell") operates in two
business segments: petrochemicals and refining. The petrochemical segment
consists of olefins including ethylene, propylene, butadiene, butylenes and
specialty products; polyolefins including polypropylene, low-density
polyethylene and high-density polyethylene ("HDPE"); aromatics produced at the
Channelview petrochemical facility ("Channelview Facility") including benzene
and toluene; methanol; methyl tertiary butyl ether ("MTBE"); and refinery
blending stocks.
On May 1, 1995, the Company acquired from Occidental Chemical Corporation resin
production facilities at Victoria and Matagorda, Texas, with a combined annual
production capacity of approximately 1.5 billion pounds of HDPE, associated
research and development activities and the rights to the Alathon(R) trademark
("ALATHON Business"). See Note 4 of "NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS."
The refining segment consists of refined petroleum products, including gasoline,
heating oil and jet fuel; aromatics produced at the full-conversion Houston,
Texas refinery ("Refinery"), including benzene, toluene, paraxylene and
orthoxylene; lubricants, including industrial and motor oils; olefins
feedstocks; and crude oil resales.
As discussed in Note 3 of "NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS", on July
1, 1993, Lyondell and CITGO Petroleum Corporation ("CITGO") announced the
commencement of operations of LYONDELL-CITGO Refining Company Ltd. ("LCR"), a
new entity owned by subsidiaries of the Company and CITGO. LCR owns and operates
the refining business formerly owned by the Company, including the Refinery. LCR
is undertaking a major upgrade project at the Refinery to enable the facility to
process substantial additional volumes of very heavy crude oil ("Upgrade
Project"). CITGO is providing a major portion of the funds for the Upgrade
Project which through December 31, 1995 totaled $328 million and has provided
$100 million for
30
<PAGE>
funding other capital projects. The Upgrade Project is expected to be
operational in early 1997. The cost estimate for the Upgrade Project, previously
estimated at $980 million, is currently undergoing further study and could be
increased. The revised cost estimate will depend on a number of factors,
including the impact of scheduling decisions. Any increase is expected to be
less than 10 percent.
On July 1, 1993, LCR entered into a long-term crude oil supply contract ("Crude
Supply Contract") with Lagoven, S.A.("LAGOVEN"), an affiliate of CITGO. In
addition, under terms of a long-term product sales agreement ("Products
Agreement"), CITGO is currently purchasing all of the light refined products
produced at the Refinery. Both LAGOVEN and CITGO are subsidiaries of Petroleos
de Venezuela, S.A., the national oil company of Venezuela.
Prior to completion of the Upgrade Project, LCR is required to purchase and
LAGOVEN is required to sell sufficient crude oil to satisfy the Refinery's
coking capacity from a minimum 125,000 barrels per day to a maximum of 135,000
barrels per day of heavy Venezuelan crude oil. LAGOVEN has the right, but not
the obligation, to supply incremental amounts above 135,000 barrels per day.
Following completion of the Upgrade Project, that minimum is increased to
200,000 barrels per day (allowing for scheduled or unscheduled downtime).
The Crude Supply Contract incorporates a formula price based on the market value
of a slate of refined products deemed to be produced from each particular crude
oil or feedstock, less: (i) certain deemed refining costs, adjustable for
inflation; (ii) certain actual costs, including crude transportation costs,
import duties and taxes; and (iii) a deemed margin, which varies according to
the grade of crude oil or other feedstock delivered. Deemed costs are adjusted
periodically based on inflation rates for specific deemed cost components.
Adjustments to margins track, but are less than, inflation rates. Because
deemed operating costs and the slate of refined products deemed to be produced
for a given barrel of crude oil or other feedstock do not necessarily reflect
the actual costs and yields in any period and also because the market value of
the refined products used in the pricing formula does not necessarily reflect
the actual price received for the refined products, the actual refining margin
earned by LCR under the Crude Supply Contract will vary depending on, among
other things, the efficiency with which LCR conducts its operations during such
period.
Notwithstanding the limitations discussed above, however, the Crude Supply
Contract is designed to reduce the inherent earnings and cash flow volatility of
the refining operations of LCR irrespective of market fluctuations of either
crude oil or refined products. Specifically, should the market value of refined
products "deemed" to be produced from the Venezuelan crude oil increase, the
"deemed" cost of crude oil to LCR will also increase. Alternatively, if the
market value of refined products "deemed" to be produced from the Venezuelan
crude oil decreases, the "deemed" cost of crude oil to LCR will also decrease.
This results in relatively stable "deemed" margins regardless of refined
products market volatility. If the actual yields, costs or volumes differ
substantially from those contemplated by the Crude Supply Contract, the benefits
of this agreement to LCR could be substantially different than anticipated.
Prior to commencement of LCR operations on July 1, 1993, the petrochemical and
refining operations of the Company were considered to be a single segment due to
the integrated nature of their operations. However, these operations are now
considered to be separate segments due to the formation of LCR and the related
separate management and operations of that entity. See Note 19 of "NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."
The following table sets forth sales volumes for the Company's major products
for the periods indicated. Sales volumes include production, purchases of
products for resale, propylene production from the product flexibility unit and
draws from inventory.
31
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31
----------------------------
1995 1994 1993
----------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SELECTED PETROCHEMICAL PRODUCTS
(MILLIONS) (EXCLUDING INTERSEGMENT SALES):
Ethylene, propylene and polymers
(pounds) 6,832 6,090 5,366
Other olefins (pounds) (a) 1,030 1,048 1,150
Methanol (gallons) (a) 199 169 225
Aromatics (gallons) 152 160 125
REFINED PRODUCTS (THOUSAND BARRELS PER
DAY) (EXCLUDING INTERSEGMENT SALES):
Gasoline 109 109 120
Heating oil (no. 2 distillate) 52 44 62
Jet fuel 29 24 30
Aromatics 8 8 10
Other refined products 56 46 41
-------- ----- ------
Total refined products volumes 254 231 263
======== ===== ======
</TABLE>
(a) Due to a change in a sales contract with a customer effective January 1,
1994, these products are now consumed in the manufacture of MTBE. The 1993
sales volumes, if restated in a manner consistent with 1994 and 1995, would be
797 million pounds and 195 million gallons for other olefins and methanol,
respectively.
The following table sets forth the Company's sales and other revenues for the
periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31
---------------------------
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994 1993
- ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PETROCHEMICAL PRODUCTS
(EXCLUDING INTERSEGMENT SALES):
Ethylene, propylene and polymers $1,790 $1,113 $ 808
Other olefins (a) 211 173 169
Methanol (a) 118 133 89
Aromatics 144 171 120
Other petrochemical products and 203 193 140
other revenues
-------- ----- ------
Total petrochemical products
sales $2,466 $1,783 $1,326
-------- ----- ------
REFINED PRODUCTS
(EXCLUDING INTERSEGMENT SALES):
Gasoline $ 879 $ 813 $ 950
Heating oil (no. 2 distillate) 375 311 481
Jet fuel 220 178 245
Aromatics 240 152 167
Other refined products and other
revenues 386 324 280
-------- ----- ------
Total refined products sales 2,100 1,778 2,123
-------- ----- ------
Crude oil resales (b) 370 296 401
-------- ----- ------
Total refined products and
crude oil sales $2,470 $2,074 $2,524
======== ====== ======
</TABLE>
(a) Due to a change in a sales contract with a customer effective January 1,
1994, these products are now consumed in the manufacture of MTBE. The 1993
sales values, if restated in a manner consistent with 1994 and 1995, would be
$126 million and $77 million for other olefins and methanol, respectively.
(b) Crude oil resales consist of revenues from the resale of previously
purchased crude oil and from locational exchanges of crude oil that are
settled on a cash basis. Crude oil exchanges and resales facilitate the
operation of the refining segment by allowing the Company to optimize the
crude oil feedstock mix in response to market conditions and refinery
maintenance turnarounds and also to reduce transportation costs.
32
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Net income for 1995 was $389 million or $4.86 per share compared with $223
million or $2.78 per share in 1994 and $26 million or $.33 per share in 1993.
The $166 million earnings increase in 1995 versus 1994 was primarily due to
higher petrochemical and aromatics sales margins and to higher polymers
earnings. Earnings for 1993 included a $22 million after-tax benefit for the
cumulative effect related to prior periods associated with a change in
accounting for major maintenance turnarounds. Excluding the effect of this
accounting change, the $219 million earnings increase in 1994 versus 1993 was
primarily due to higher petrochemical margins and higher olefins sales volumes,
partially offset by lower refining margins.
PETROCHEMICAL SEGMENT
REVENUES Sales and other operating revenues, including intersegment sales, were
$2.7 billion in 1995 compared to $2.0 billion in 1994 and $1.5 billion in 1993.
The 1995 increase of $684 million compared to 1994 was primarily due to sales of
HDPE resulting from the acquisition of the ALATHON Business effective May 1,
1995. Contributing to the increase were higher olefins sales prices reflecting
continued strong market conditions during the first half of 1995 for
petrochemicals that resulted from the high U.S. economic growth rate, an
improved worldwide economy and industry supply disruptions during the latter
part of 1994.
The 1994 increase in sales and other operating revenues of $467 million compared
to 1993 was primarily caused by higher petrochemical sales prices and volumes.
Higher demand for olefins and polyolefins was caused by an improved worldwide
economy, particularly in the U.S. automotive and construction sectors, which
created better market conditions for petrochemicals generally. Methanol sales
prices were higher due to higher demand caused by the improvement in the
worldwide economy and increased use of MTBE, of which methanol is a significant
component, as well as industry supply disruptions.
COST OF SALES Cost of sales was $1.9 billion in 1995 compared to $1.5 billion
in 1994 and $1.4 billion in 1993. The 1995 increase of $412 million compared to
1994 was primarily due to the operation of the ALATHON Business and to higher
olefins feedstock costs caused by higher raw material prices. Olefins raw
material prices were higher due to higher worldwide crude oil and petroleum
product prices.
The 1994 increase in cost of sales of $108 million compared to 1993 was
principally due to higher olefins feedstock costs resulting from higher
production rates, partially offset by lower feedstock prices.
Cost of sales was increased $1 million in 1995 and reduced $6 million in 1993
associated with reductions in inventories accounted for under the LIFO method of
accounting.
SELLING EXPENSES Selling expenses amounted to $84 million in 1995 compared to
$40 million in 1994 and $37 million in 1993. The $44 million increase in
selling expenses in 1995 compared to 1994 was primarily due to the operation of
the ALATHON Business which transports finished product to customers by rail and
classifies the charge as selling expense and, to a lesser extent, to higher
terminal expense partially due to logistical needs for a maintenance turnaround
on one of the olefins units.
The $3 million increase in selling expenses in 1994 compared to 1993 was
primarily due to higher terminal and freight expenses caused by higher
petrochemical sales volumes.
OPERATING INCOME Operating income amounted to $641 million in 1995 compared to
$413 million in 1994 and $57 million in 1993. The $228 million improvement in
operating income in 1995 compared to 1994 was primarily due to higher olefins
sales margins and the addition of the ALATHON Business, partially offset by
lower olefins sales volumes. Olefins sales margins were higher due to
significantly higher sales prices that more than offset increased raw material
prices. Olefins sales prices were higher due to supply and demand factors
resulting from
33
<PAGE>
the improved economy. Olefins sales volumes were lower due in part to the
shutdown of one of the olefins units during 1995 for a scheduled maintenance
turnaround and also to slower demand in the latter part of 1995 caused by
inventory corrections in olefins derivatives.
The $356 million operating income increase in 1994 compared to 1993 was
primarily due to higher petrochemical sales margins and higher olefins sales
volumes. Improved olefins sales margins resulted primarily from higher sales
prices and to a lesser extent lower feedstock prices. Olefins sales prices and
volumes were higher due to higher industry-wide demand caused by the improved
worldwide economies. Contributing to the improved operating income during 1994
compared to 1993 were higher methanol sales margins, partially offset by lower
methanol sales volumes. Methanol sales margins were higher primarily due to
higher sales prices caused in part by the improved worldwide economy. Methanol
sales volumes were lower due to scheduled and unscheduled downtime of the
methanol unit.
REFINING SEGMENT
REVENUES Sales and other operating revenues, including intersegment sales, were
$2.6 billion in 1995 compared to $2.3 billion in 1994 and $2.8 billion in 1993.
The 1995 increase of $370 million compared to 1994 primarily resulted from
higher sales prices and volumes for refined products and aromatics and higher
sales volumes and prices for crude oil resales. Refined products sales prices
were higher generally due to the higher worldwide crude oil prices. Aromatics
sales prices and volumes, specifically for paraxylene and orthoxylene, increased
because of improved market conditions. Paraxylene prices were positively
impacted by high worldwide growth of polyester, particularly in the polyethylene
terephthalate bottle sector, and prices continued to increase through all of
1995. Orthoxylene prices peaked and began to decline in mid-1995 due to
increased worldwide production and slower demand. Refined products sales
volumes were higher during 1995 compared to 1994 due to higher production rates
which was caused by less scheduled and unscheduled downtime of production units
during 1995 for repair and maintenance.
The 1994 decrease of $489 million compared to 1993 was primarily due to lower
resale volumes of purchased light products, lower sales prices for refined
products and lower crude oil resale volumes. The purchase and resale activity
for light refined products conducted for logistic and other reasons was
curtailed because, effective with the beginning of LCR operations on July 1,
1993, a majority of the refined products produced at the Refinery are now sold
to CITGO under the Products Agreement. Refined products sales prices were lower
primarily due to lower industry crude oil prices. Lower crude oil resale
volumes resulted from reduced logistical purchases required to meet refinery
feedstock requirements which was caused by a change in crude oil market supply
factors.
COST OF SALES Cost of sales was $2.5 billion in 1995 compared to $2.2 billion
in 1994 and $2.6 billion in 1993. The 1995 increase compared to 1994 of $293
million was primarily due to higher raw material costs and higher logistical
purchases of crude oil that were resold. Raw material costs were higher due to
higher crude oil and other feedstock prices and to higher raw material
consumption due to higher finished product production rates. Finished product
production rates were higher in 1995 compared to 1994 due to less scheduled and
unscheduled downtime of production units during 1995 for repair and maintenance.
The 1994 decrease compared to 1993 of $468 million was principally due to lower
purchases for resale of light refined products, lower feedstock costs primarily
due to lower crude oil prices and lower logistical purchases of crude oil that
were resold. Cost of sales was reduced by $3 million in 1995 and increased by
$1 million in 1994 associated with a reduction in LIFO inventories.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES Selling, general and
administrative expenses were $61 million in 1995 compared to $54 million in 1994
and $48 million in 1993. The $7 million increase in 1995 compared to 1994 was
primarily due to higher employee compensation and higher product transportation
expense due to higher sales volumes. The $6 million increase in 1994 compared
to 1993 primarily resulted from higher general and administrative expenses for
personnel and realignment expenses associated with ongoing operations of LCR
starting on July 1, 1993.
34
<PAGE>
OPERATING INCOME Operating income amounted to $124 million in 1995 compared to
$54 million in 1994 and $81 million in 1993. The $70 million increase in 1995
compared to 1994 resulted from higher sales margins for aromatics and refined
products, partially offset by higher refining period expenses and selling,
general and administrative expenses. Aromatics sales margins were higher due to
higher sales prices, particularly for paraxylene and orthoxylene. Refined
products sales margins were higher due to processing higher volumes of
Venezuelan crude oil purchased under the Crude Supply Contract in both the
coking and cracking modes. Period expenses were higher due to higher employee
compensation and higher scheduled and unscheduled repair and maintenance
expense.
The $27 million decrease in 1994 compared to 1993 was primarily due to lower
refined products margins and sales volumes and higher general and administrative
expenses, partially offset by improved profitability for aromatics. Refined
products earnings were negatively affected in 1994 by poor industry conditions
as well as lower volumes of heavy Venezuelan crude oil processed in the coking
mode which was caused by downtime for turnarounds on the coker and largest crude
distillation unit and operating problems prior to the turnarounds. Aromatics
earnings were higher in 1994 compared to 1993 primarily due to higher sales
prices.
UNALLOCATED
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES General and administrative expenses were
$59 million in 1995 compared to $43 million in 1994 and $45 million in 1993.
The $16 million increase in 1995 compared to 1994 was primarily due to higher
management incentive compensation related expenses, a significant portion of
which was for a management incentive compensation plan adopted in 1995.
INTEREST EXPENSE AND INTEREST INCOME Interest expense was $80 million in 1995
compared to $74 million in 1994 and $74 million in 1993. The $6 million
increase in interest expense in 1995 compared to 1994 resulted from amounts
borrowed to partially finance the acquisition of the ALATHON Business.
Interest income was $6 million in 1995 compared to $5 million in 1994 and $2
million in 1993. The $1 million increase resulted from higher levels of excess
cash invested at higher interest rates prior to the acquisition of the ALATHON
Business. The $3 million increase in 1994 compared with 1993 was principally
due to higher amounts of cash associated with LCR minority owner cash
contributions available for investment.
MINORITY INTEREST IN LYONDELL-CITGO REFINING COMPANY LTD. Minority interest was
$14 million in 1995 compared with $6 million in 1994 and $5 million in 1993,
representing the allocated share of LCR's net income to CITGO, the minority
owner of LCR.
INCOME TAX The effective income tax rate during 1995 from continuing operations
was 37.1 percent compared to 36.2 percent for 1994 and 73.1 percent for 1993.
State income tax was the primary difference between the effective tax rate and
the 35 percent federal statutory rate during 1995 and 1994. The difference for
1993 between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate was primarily
due to a charge to state deferred taxes related to Texas franchise taxes and the
unfavorable impact on federal deferred taxes of the increase in the federal tax
rate.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS Lyondell's cash flow from operations totaled $471
million during 1995, a strong improvement over the $155 million and $84 million
generated in 1994 and 1993, respectively. The increase in 1995 compared to 1994
was primarily attributable to the increase in net income and more favorable net
working capital changes in 1995.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES Excluding refinery upgrade expenditures totaling $458
million, the Company made capital expenditures totaling $524 million during
1995, of which $356 million was for the acquisition of the ALATHON Business, $35
million was related to environmental projects primarily at the Refinery and $133
million was for
35
<PAGE>
other projects primarily at the various petrochemical plant locations. Refinery
upgrade expenditures during 1995 were funded by $176 million of contributions
made during 1995 by CITGO, the minority owner of LCR, $250 million from external
borrowing by LCR, $25 million from Lyondell in the form of subordinated loans to
LCR and $7 million from the restricted cash balance.
The 1996 capital expenditures budget, excluding the Upgrade Project, has been
set at $125 million. The budget provides $46 million for Refinery projects, of
which approximately one-half is expected to be funded by Lyondell and the
remaining amount is to be funded by CITGO and a portion of the restricted cash
balance. The remaining $79 million is for petrochemical projects. About 25
percent of the 1996 petrochemical budget is for the completion of three
previously announced capacity expansion increases of approximately: seven
percent in olefins capacity at the Channelview Facility; 33 percent in
polypropylene capacity at the Bayport Facility; and 100 percent in alkylate
capacity at the Channelview Facility. Other major petrochemical projects
include process control upgrades at several operating units.
In addition to the 1996 capital expenditures budget, spending in the range of
$400 million is planned for the Upgrade Project designed to increase the
Refinery's ability to process larger volumes of very heavy Venezuelan crude oil,
of which 25 percent or approximately $100 million is to be funded by CITGO, 25
percent or approximately $100 million is to be funded by Lyondell in the form of
subordinated loans to LCR and the remainder is expected to be funded through an
LCR external borrowing. This current funding plan will continue for a total
Upgrade Project cost of up to $1 billion. If total spending on the Upgrade
Project exceeds $1 billion, Lyondell expects to fund one-half of these
additional costs in the form of subordinated loans.
As of December 31, 1995, $7 million of cash was restricted for use in LCR
capital projects, including the Upgrade Project and other expenditures as
determined by the LCR owners.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES Cash flows associated with financing activities during
1995 included: $72 million for dividend payments; $10 million for scheduled
repayments of Medium-Term Notes; $250 million proceeds from borrowings under
LCR's $450 million, five-year term credit facility, discussed below; and net $83
million proceeds from short-term borrowing discussed below consisting of $103
million net proceeds from borrowings under an uncommitted credit line and $20
million net repayments under LCR's $70 million working capital facility.
The total cash expenditure for the acquisition of the ALATHON Business was $420
million, including approximately $64 million for inventories. The Company
financed the acquisition with internal cash and $230 million of short-term
borrowings from its existing financing arrangements.
The Company has a five-year, $400 million revolving credit facility ("Facility")
with a group of banks expiring June 2000. Borrowings under the Facility bear
interest at either the eurodollar, certificate of deposit ("CD") or prime rates
or based on a competitive auction feature wherein the interest rate can be
established by competitive bids submitted by the sponsoring banks, all at the
Company's option. The Facility is available for working capital and general
corporate purposes as needed and contains covenants relating to dividend
payments, debt incurrence, liens, disposition of assets, mergers and
consolidations, fixed charge and leverage ratios and certain payments to LCR. At
December 31, 1995, no amounts were outstanding under this Facility. See Note 11
of "NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."
The Company also has uncommitted lines of credit totaling $265 million with
banks and other financial institutions. These uncommitted lines of credit
provide the Company with additional borrowing flexibility and potentially more
competitive interest rates. The Company can borrow money on these uncommitted
lines of credit on such terms as may be mutually agreed upon at the time amounts
are borrowed. The lines of credit can be terminated by the lenders, in their
sole discretion, on short notice. As of December 31, 1995, the Company had $103
million outstanding under these uncommitted lines of credit.
In May 1995, LCR entered into two credit facilities totaling $520 million with a
group of banks with The Bank of New York as agent. The first facility is a $70
million, 364-day revolving working capital facility, which replaced LCR's former
$70 million revolving working capital facility, that will be utilized for
general business purposes unrelated to the Upgrade Project and for letters of
credit. At December 31, 1995, no amounts were outstanding
36
<PAGE>
under this credit facility. The second facility is a $450 million, five-year
term credit facility that is being used in connection with the Upgrade Project.
Prior to the completion of the Upgrade Project, all financing costs related to
the $450 million credit facility will be funded by CITGO. At December 31, 1995,
$250 million was outstanding under this credit facility. Interest for both
facilities is based on prime or eurodollar rates at LCR's option. The facilities
also contain covenants which require LCR to maintain a minimum net worth which
increases each year until 1998 and maintenance of certain financial ratios
defined in the agreements. The facilities also contain other customary covenants
which limit LCR's ability to modify certain significant contracts, incur
additional debt or liens, dispose of assets, make restricted payments as defined
in the agreements or merge or consolidate with other entities. See Note 11 of
"NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."
In February 1996, the Company issued $300 million of debt securities ("Debt
Securities") consisting of $150 million of 6.5 percent notes due 2006 and $150
million of 7.55 percent debentures due 2026. Proceeds received from the sale of
the Debt Securities are intended to be used for retirement of maturing debt and
general corporate purposes. The Debt Securities will be unsecured obligations
and rank on a parity with all other unsecured and unsubordinated debt of the
Company.
On January 26, 1996, the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly
dividend in the amount of $.225 per share of common stock, payable March 15,
1996 to stockholders of record on February 23, 1996.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". SFAS No. 123 prescribes accounting
and reporting standards for all stock-based compensation plans, including
employee stock options, restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights. SFAS
No. 123 does not require companies to change their existing accounting for
employee stock options under Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (the intrinsic value method which
often results in no compensation expense) but requires pro forma disclosures of
what net income and earnings per share would have been had the new fair value
method been used. In addition, SFAS No. 123 requires all companies to make
significantly more general disclosures regarding employee stock options (beyond
the pro forma disclosures) than now are required. The optional recognition and
new disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, including the pro formas, are
effective for 1996. The Company has elected to continue following present
accounting rules under APB Opinion No. 25, and will adopt the new disclosure
provisions of SFAS No. 123 beginning in 1996.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Various environmental laws and regulations impose substantial requirements upon
the operations of the Company. The Company's policy is to be in compliance with
such laws and regulations, which include, among others, the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), as
amended, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") and the Clean Air
Act and Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. In connection with the transfer of
assets and liabilities from Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO") to the Company
at the time the Company was formed into a separate company, effective July 1,
1988, the Company and ARCO entered into an agreement ("Cross-Indemnity
Agreement") whereby the Company agreed to defend and indemnify ARCO against
certain uninsured claims and liabilities which ARCO may incur relating to the
operation of the business of the Company prior to July 1, 1988, including
certain liabilities which may arise out of pending and future lawsuits. ARCO,
along with many other companies, has been named a potentially responsible party
("PRP") under CERCLA in connection with the past disposal of waste at third
party waste sites. Pursuant to the Cross-Indemnity Agreement, the Company has an
obligation to reimburse ARCO for a portion of its uninsured remediation costs
for two of the sites for which it has been named a PRP.
37
<PAGE>
The Company reserves for contingencies, including those based upon unasserted
claims, that are probable and reasonably estimable. In connection with
environmental matters, the Company established reserves based upon known facts
and circumstances. Based on current environmental laws and regulations, the
Company believes that it has adequately reserved for the matters described above
and, based upon such reserves, does not anticipate any material adverse effect
upon its earnings, operations or competitive position, although the resolution
in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material
impact on the Company's results of operations for that period.
The environmental reserve on December 31, 1995 was $17 million. The
environmental reserve includes $.5 million of estimated future payments to ARCO
for remediation costs associated with CERCLA waste disposal sites and $16.5
million of estimated remediation costs related to waste disposal sites located
within the Company's facilities associated with RCRA. The Company spent $.4
million, $.5 million and $.6 million in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively,
relating to CERCLA matters. The Company also spent $.9 million, $6 million and
$2 million in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively, in conjunction with RCRA
matters. The Company estimates it will spend approximately $2 million in
conjunction with CERCLA and RCRA matters in 1996 which is included in the
December 31, 1995 environmental reserve.
CURRENT BUSINESS OUTLOOK
Lyondell's results through most of 1995 reflected a continuation of the strong
business environment for petrochemicals and polymers that began in 1994. During
the first nine months of 1995, the domestic olefins industry operated at close
to maximum available capacity. However, additional olefins and polymers
capacity that came onstream in 1995, slower economic growth and inventory
corrections in olefins derivatives caused a sharp market decline in the latter
part of the year. Operating rates and margins for both olefins and polymers
declined throughout the industry and for Lyondell during this time.
Despite this trend toward weaker business conditions, the ALATHON Business,
acquired in May of 1995, contributed significantly to 1995 results. It has a
strong market position in its product lines and will provide Lyondell with
ethylene integration benefits.
During 1996, the supply fundamentals in olefins are expected to be more
favorable than in the latter part of 1995, with fewer expected capacity
additions and less significant anticipated downstream inventory corrections.
Management believes that if demand growth in 1996 is sustained at average
historic levels, olefins market conditions should improve.
Lyondell's methanol business performed very well in 1995 largely on the strength
of very strong first quarter prices and margins. As industry supply disruptions
diminished and the strong growth of demand for methanol into MTBE subsided due
to reformulated gasoline uncertainties, methanol business conditions returned to
more typical levels. Although methanol demand growth is still good and is
expected to increase in 1996, substantial new capacity is expected in various
parts of the world over the next few years. While the Company expects its
methanol business to remain profitable, it is not likely that methanol
profitability will return to the high levels of late 1994 and early 1995.
The results from the refining segment improved in 1995 due to higher
profitability from aromatics and also from refined products, which benefited
from record processing rates of heavy Venezuelan crude oil. These factors more
than offset depressed Gulf Coast industry margins, which impacted about 40
percent of LCR's crude oil processed.
In 1995, the aromatics markets, specifically for paraxylene and orthoxylene,
were very strong. Paraxylene demand increased more than supply, driven by high
worldwide growth for polyester, particularly in the polyethylene terephthalate
bottle sector. Strength in orthoxylene was primarily due to strong overall
economic conditions in the first part of 1995. This led to very favorable
prices and margins in these products. As economic conditions slowed later in
1995, orthoxylene prices and margins declined, but paraxylene markets continued
to improve into the first
38
<PAGE>
part of 1996. New paraxylene capacity coming onstream later in 1996 may
negatively impact this market over the course of the year.
Management believes that the Company has improved its refining business with the
formation of LCR and the benefits of the Crude Supply Contract and Products
Agreement. These arrangements are designed to diminish the impact of market
volatility and stabilize cash flows at attractive levels relative to historic
performance. Management believes that the Venezuelan crude oil processing
performance achieved in 1995 could be maintained or improved in 1996, which
could result in improved operating performance for this portion of the refining
business. Until the Upgrade Project is operating in early 1997, about 40
percent of LCR's crude oil volume, which is not purchased under the Crude Supply
Contract, continues to be sensitive to market conditions. In early 1996, there
has been little change in the poor market conditions that have characterized the
Gulf Coast refining business for the past several years.
Profitability and cash flows for the petrochemical and refining businesses are
affected by industry product supply and demand, feedstock costs, capital
expenditures required to meet increasingly stringent environmental standards,
repair and maintenance costs and the related downtime of production units.
Turnarounds on major units can have significant financial impacts due to the
repair and maintenance expenditures incurred as well as the associated loss of
production which can result in lower profitability during the period of the
turnaround. A turnaround of one of the Company's two olefins units was performed
in the fourth quarter of 1995, during which work was completed to debottleneck
this unit, increasing its capacity by approximately seven percent or 120 million
pounds per year. The Company currently intends to perform a turnaround on the
other olefins unit during the first half of 1996 which will also incorporate
work to increase this units capacity by approximately the same amount. LCR is
planning a maintenance turnaround of its fluid catalytic cracking unit in the
fourth quarter of 1996.
Management believes that business conditions will be such that cash balances,
cash generated from operating activities and existing lines of credit will be
adequate to meet future cash requirements for scheduled debt repayments,
necessary capital expenditures and to sustain for the reasonably foreseeable
future the regular quarterly dividend. However, the Company continually
evaluates its cash requirements and allocates cash in order to maximize
stockholder returns.
_________________
Management cautions against projecting any future results based on present or
prior earnings levels because of the cyclical nature of the refining and
petrochemical industries and uncertainties associated with the United States and
worldwide economies and current and potential United States governmental
regulatory actions.
39
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C> <C>
Report of Independent Accountants 41
Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Income and Accumulated Earnings (Deficit) 42
Consolidated Balance Sheets......................................... 43
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows............................... 44
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.......................... 45
</TABLE>
40
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
of Lyondell Petrochemical Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lyondell
Petrochemical Company as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related
consolidated statements of income and accumulated earnings (deficit) and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Lyondell
Petrochemical Company as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1995 in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, during 1993
the Company changed its method of accounting for the cost of repairs and
maintenance incurred in connection with turnarounds of major units at its
manufacturing facilities.
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Houston, Texas
February 12, 1996, except as to the information presented
in Note 11, for which the date is February 21, 1996
41
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND ACCUMULATED EARNINGS (DEFICIT)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
--------------------------------
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT PER SHARE
AMOUNTS 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------------------ --------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SALES AND OTHER OPERATING REVENUES:
Unrelated parties $4,611 $3,543 $3,572
Related parties 325 314 278
------ ------ ------
4,936 3,857 3,850
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales:
Unrelated parties 3,801 3,066 3,359
Related parties 225 230 268
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 204 137 130
------ ------ ------
4,230 3,433 3,757
------ ------ ------
Operating income 706 424 93
Interest expense (88) (74) (74)
Interest income 6 5 2
Minority interest in LYONDELL-CITGO
Refining Company Ltd. (14) (6) (5)
------ ------ ------
Income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting
changes 618 349 16
Provision for income taxes 229 126 12
------ ------ ------
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF
ACCOUNTING CHANGES 389 223 4
Cumulative effect of accounting changes,
net of tax -- -- 22
------ ------ ------
NET INCOME $ 389 $ 223 $ 26
====== ====== ======
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting changes $ 4.86 $ 2.78 $ .06
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes -- -- .27
------ ------ ------
Net income $ 4.86 $ 2.78 $ .33
====== ====== ======
ACCUMULATED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) AT
BEGINNING OF YEAR $ (175) $ (326) $ (244)
Net income 389 223 26
Cash dividends (72) (72) (108)
------ ------ ------
ACCUMULATED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) AT
END OF YEAR $ 142 $ (175) $ (326)
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
----------------------
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------ --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3 $ 52
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 7 42
Accounts receivable:
Trade 340 331
Related parties 22 29
Inventories 265 229
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 41 14
------ ------
Total current assets 678 697
------ ------
Fixed assets:
Property, plant and equipment 3,804 2,810
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization 1,990 1,930
------ ------
1,814 880
Deferred charges and other assets 114 86
------ ------
Total assets $2,606 $1,663
====== ======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable:
Trade $ 358 $ 287
Related parties 1 1
Notes payable 103 20
Current maturities of long-term debt 150 10
Other accrued liabilities 138 115
------ ------
Total current liabilities 750 433
------ ------
Long-term debt 807 707
Other liabilities and deferred credits 95 83
Deferred income taxes 115 109
Commitments and contingencies
Minority interest 459 268
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value,
80,000,000 shares authorized, none
outstanding
Common stock, $1 par value, 250,000,000
shares authorized, 80,000,000 issued
and outstanding 80 80
Additional paid-in capital 158 158
Accumulated earnings (deficit) 142 (175)
------ ------
Total stockholders' equity 380 63
------ ------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $2,606 $1,663
====== ======
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
--------------------------------
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------------------ --------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 389 $ 223 $ 26
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes, net of tax -- -- (22)
Depreciation and amortization 86 65 58
Deferred taxes 3 10 7
(Increase) decrease in accounts
receivable (1) (156) 50
Increase in inventories (36) (38) (11)
Increase (decrease) in accounts
payable 54 59 (50)
Net change in other working capital
accounts (1) 28 16
Minority interest 14 6 5
Other (37) (42) 5
------ ------ ------
Net cash provided by operating
activities 471 155 84
------ ------ ------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to fixed assets (982) (252) (69)
Purchases of short-term investments -- (20) (9)
Proceeds from sales of short-term
investments -- 26 16
------ ------ ------
Net cash used in investing activities (982) (246) (62)
------ ------ ------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Minority owner contribution 176 136 116
Net proceeds from short-term debt 83 16 4
Proceeds from long-term debt 250 -- --
Repayments of long-term debt (10) (8) (29)
Dividends paid (72) (72) (108)
------ ------ ------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities 427 72 (17)
------ ------ ------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH, RESTRICTED
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (84) (19) 5
Cash, restricted cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period 94 113 108
------ ------ ------
Cash, restricted cash and cash
equivalents at end of period $ 10 $ 94 $ 113
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. FORMATION OF THE COMPANY AND OPERATIONS
Lyondell was formed in 1985 and was operated as a separate division ("Lyondell
Division") of Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO") through June 1988. Effective
July 1, 1988, ARCO transferred substantially all the assets and liabilities
relating to the integrated petrochemical and petroleum processing business of
the Lyondell Division, along with certain pipeline assets that were not formerly
a part of the Lyondell Division, to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lyondell
Petrochemical Company, a Delaware corporation. For financial reporting purposes,
the transfer of these assets and liabilities was recorded at the historical net
book value of $127 million as of July 1, 1988. As the context may require, all
references hereafter to the "Company" or "Lyondell" include Lyondell
Petrochemical Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and LYONDELL-CITGO Refining
Company Ltd. ("LCR").
On January 25, 1989, ARCO completed an initial public offering of 43,000,000
shares of the Company's 80,000,000 shares of common stock owned by ARCO. The
Company received none of the proceeds from the sale. As of December 31, 1995,
ARCO owned 39,921,400 shares of Lyondell common stock, representing 49.9 percent
of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company.
On August 8, 1994, ARCO completed an offering of three-year debt securities
("Exchangeable Notes") exchangeable upon maturity, at ARCO's option, into
Lyondell common stock or cash with an equal value ("ARCO Note Offering"). If
ARCO elects to deliver shares of Lyondell common stock at the maturity of the
Exchangeable Notes, ARCO's equity interest in Lyondell will be substantially
reduced or eliminated, depending on the price of Lyondell common stock at such
time. In connection with the ARCO Note Offering, the five ARCO officers who were
Directors of the Company resigned from the Company's Board of Directors;
however, ARCO did not limit its right to nominate and vote for candidates for
Lyondell's Board of Directors. Until the maturity of the Exchangeable Notes,
ARCO generally intends to vote its shares in proportion to the votes of the non-
ARCO stockholders, except under certain limited circumstances.
The Company operates in two business segments: petrochemicals and refining.
The petrochemicals segment manufactures a wide variety of petrochemicals
including olefins, polyolefins, methanol, MTBE and aromatics. The Company's
petrochemical products are used primarily in the manufacture of other chemicals
and products, which in turn are used in the production of a wide variety of
consumer and industrial products. The refining segment operates primarily
through the Company's interest in LCR, a Texas limited liability company, and
manufactures refined petroleum products, including gasoline, heating oil, jet
fuel, fuel oil, aromatics and lubricants. LCR sells its principal refined
products to CITGO Petroleum Corporation ("CITGO") (see Note 3). Although during
the previous five years the contribution to operating profits made by the
petrochemicals segment has been over two and one-half times greater than the
contribution to operating profits made by the refining segment, that trend could
be reversed in any particular year due to margin volatility within the
petrochemical and petroleum refining industries.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, including LCR. All significant
transactions between the entities of the Company have been eliminated from the
consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition - Revenue from product sales is generally recognized upon
delivery of products to the customer.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid debt
instruments such as certificates of deposit, commercial paper and money market
accounts purchased with an original maturity date of three months or less. The
Company's policy is to invest cash in conservative, highly rated instruments and
limit the amount of
45
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
credit exposure to any one institution. The Company performs periodic
evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions
which are considered in the Company's investment strategy.
The Company has no requirements for compensating balances in a specific amount
at a specific point in time. The Company does maintain compensating balances
for some of its banking services and products. Such balances are maintained on
an average basis and are solely at the Company's discretion, so that effectively
on any given date, none of the Company's cash is restricted with the exception
of cash held for use in connection with LCR capital projects and other
expenditures as determined by the LCR owners (see Note 6).
All investments in debt and equity securities are accounted for in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115, "Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" which the Company adopted
as of January 1, 1994. Management determines the appropriate classification of
investments in debt securities as trading, available-for-sale or held-to-
maturity at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each
balance sheet date. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, prior period financial
statements have not been restated to reflect the change in accounting principle.
The effect of adopting SFAS No. 115 had no impact on income.
Accounts Receivable - The Company sells its products primarily to companies in
the petrochemical and refining industries. The Company performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers' financial condition and in certain circumstances
requires letters of credit from them. The Company's allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable, which is reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as a
reduction in accounts receivable, totaled $3 million at December 31, 1995 and
1994.
Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined on the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") basis except for materials and
supplies, which are valued at average cost.
Fixed Assets - Fixed assets are recorded at cost. Depreciation of fixed assets
is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the related assets as follows.
Manufacturing facilities and equipment - 5 to 30 years
Leased assets and improvements - 5 to 20 years
Upon retirement or sale, the Company removes the cost of the assets and the
related accumulated depreciation from the accounts and reflects any resulting
gains or losses in income. The Company's policy is to capitalize interest cost
incurred on debt during the construction of major projects that exceed one year.
Turnaround Maintenance and Repair Expenses - In the first quarter of 1993,
effective January 1, 1993, the Company changed its method of accounting for the
cost of repairs and maintenance incurred in connection with turnarounds of major
units at its manufacturing facilities. Under the new method, turnaround costs
exceeding $5 million are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis until
the next planned turnaround, generally four to six years. In years prior to
1993, all turnaround costs were expensed as incurred. Management believes that
the new method of accounting is preferable in that it provides for a better
matching of turnaround costs with future product revenues. The cumulative
effect of this accounting change resulted in a benefit of $33 million ($22
million or $.27 per share after income taxes) and was included in first quarter
1993 income.
Environmental Remediation Costs - Expenditures related to investigation and
remediation of contaminated sites, which include operating facilities and waste
disposal sites, are accrued when it is probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount of that liability can reasonably be estimated.
Environmental remediation costs are expensed or capitalized in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Exchanges - Crude oil and finished product exchange transactions, which are of a
homogeneous nature of commodities in the same line of business, that do not
involve the payment or receipt of cash, are not accounted for as purchases and
sales. Any resulting volumetric exchange balances are accounted for as
inventory in accordance
46
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
with the normal LIFO valuation policy. Exchanges that are settled through
payment and receipt of cash are accounted for as purchases and sales.
Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the
recognition of revenues and expenses for tax and financial reporting purposes
and are calculated based upon cumulative book and tax differences in the balance
sheet in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes."
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Accounting Changes - In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB") issued SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." SFAS No. 121 addresses the
accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets, such as property, plant and
equipment, identifiable intangibles including patents and trademarks, and
goodwill related to those assets. SFAS No. 121 also requires that long-lived
assets and intangibles (except for assets of a discontinued operation) held for
disposal be accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell.
The Company elected to adopt SFAS No. 121 in 1995, the effect of which had no
impact on net income.
3. LYONDELL-CITGO REFINING COMPANY LTD.
The Company and CITGO announced, on July 1, 1993, the commencement of operations
of LCR, a new entity formed and owned by subsidiaries of the Company and CITGO
in order to own and operate the Company's refining business, including the full-
conversion Houston, Texas refinery ("Refinery"). LCR is a limited liability
company organized under the laws of the state of Texas. At December 31, 1995,
CITGO had an approximate 10 percent participation interest in LCR.
LCR is undertaking a major upgrade project at the Refinery to enable the
facility to process substantial additional volumes of very heavy crude oil
("Upgrade Project"). LCR also has entered into a long-term crude supply contract
("Crude Supply Contract") with Lagoven, S.A. ("LAGOVEN"), an affiliate of CITGO.
In addition, under the terms of a long-term product sales agreement ("Products
Agreement"), CITGO purchases from LCR all of the refined products produced at
the Refinery. Both LAGOVEN and CITGO are direct or indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. ("PDVSA"), the national oil company
of Venezuela.
Under the terms of the transaction, CITGO is providing a major portion of the
funds for the Upgrade Project and has provided $100 million for funding other
capital projects. Major components of the Upgrade Project include new coking,
crude distillation and sulfur recovery units. The Upgrade Project is expected
to be operational in early 1997. CITGO has committed to reinvest its share of
operating cash flow during the Upgrade Project, while the Company has
unrestricted access to its share of operating cash flow from LCR.
4. ACQUISITION OF ALATHON(R) HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE BUSINESS
On May 1, 1995, the Company acquired Occidental Chemical Corporations Alathon(R)
high-density polyethylene ("HDPE") business ("ALATHON Business") for $356
million including certain direct costs, plus approximately $64 million for
inventory. Assets involved in the purchase include resin production facilities
at Victoria and Matagorda, Texas, associated research and development activities
and the rights to the Alathon(R) trademark. These facilities have a combined
annual production capacity of approximately 1.5 billion pounds of HDPE. The
Company financed the acquisition from internal cash and $230 million of short-
term borrowings from its existing financing arrangements.
47
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following unaudited pro forma information combines the results of operations
of the Company and the ALATHON Business for the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1994 and assumes that the acquisition of the ALATHON Business occurred on
January 1, 1994. This unaudited pro forma information may not be indicative of
results that would have actually resulted if this transaction had occurred on
January 1, 1994 or which may be obtained in the future.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT PER SHARE
AMOUNTS 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Sales and other operating revenues $5,130 $4,289
Net income 409 240
Earnings per share 5.11 3.00
</TABLE>
5. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental cash flow information is summarized as follows.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------------ ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest:
Paid $ 83 $ 72 $ 76
Less amount capitalized 6 -- --
---------------------
Net $ 77 $ 72 $ 76
Income taxes $ 252 $ 90 $ 7
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, fixed assets included $53 million and $36
million, respectively of non-cash additions which related to accounts payable
accruals. As of December 31, 1993, fixed assets included $16 million of non-
cash additions of which $14 million related to accounts payable accruals.
6. RESTRICTED FUNDS
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $7
million and $42 million, respectively, were restricted for use in connection
with LCR capital projects, including the Upgrade Project and other expenditures
as determined by the LCR owners. Presented below is a reconciliation of changes
in restricted funds for the year ended December 31, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
- ----------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Restricted - cash and cash equivalents
at December 31, 1994 $ 42
Minority owner investments:
Contributions 176
Distributable cash reinvested 17
Lyondell loan to LCR - Upgrade Project 25
Proceeds from bank loan 250
Additions to fixed assets:
Upgrade Project (458)
Refining segment - other (45)
-----
Restricted - cash and cash equivalents
at December 31, 1995 $ 7
=====
</TABLE>
48
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
7. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair value of all financial instruments included in current assets and
current liabilities, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and notes payable, approximated their carrying value due to
their short maturity. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the
Company for debt with terms and average maturities similar to the Company's debt
portfolio, the fair value of the Company's long-term debt, including amounts due
within one year, was $1.017 billion at December 31, 1995.
At December 31, 1995, the Company had issued letters of credit totaling $18
million.
The Company is party to various unconditional purchase obligation contracts as a
purchaser for product and services. At December 31, 1995, future minimum
payments under these contracts with noncancelable contract terms in excess of
one year were as follows.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS AMOUNT
- --------------------------------- ------
<S> <C>
1996 $ 30
1997 35
1998 34
1999 35
2000 34
Thereafter 192
----
Total minimum contract payments $360
====
</TABLE>
The Company's total purchases under these agreements were $21 million in 1995.
8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related party transactions with ARCO, excluding sales to ARCO Chemical Company,
are summarized as follows.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------ ----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Costs
Crude oil purchases $ 2 $ 16 $ 53
Product purchases 3 4 4
Transportation fees 26 28 27
Other, net (3) (3) (4)
----- ----- -----
Total costs $ 28 $ 45 $ 80
===== ===== =====
Sales
Products $ 1 $ 1 $ 2
Crude oil 3 3 13
----- ----- -----
Total sales $ 4 $ 4 $ 15
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
Sales to ARCO Chemical Company, an ARCO affiliate, consisting of propylene,
MTBE, benzene, ethylene, methanol and other products and services, were $321
million, $310 million and $263 million for the years ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993, respectively.
9. INVENTORIES
The categories of inventory and their book values at December 31, 1995 and 1994
were as follows.
49
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994
- ---------------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Crude oil $ 55 $ 62
Refined products 33 30
Petrochemicals 135 102
Materials and supplies 42 35
----- -----
Total inventories $ 265 $ 229
===== =====
</TABLE>
For the year ended December 31, 1995, the Company reduced cost of sales by
approximately $2 million; for the year ended December 31, 1994, the Company
increased cost of sales by approximately $1 million; and for the year ended
December 31, 1993, the Company reduced cost of sales by approximately $6
million, all associated with the reduction in LIFO inventories. The excess of
the current cost of inventories over book value was approximately $110 million
and $105 million at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
10. FIXED ASSETS
The components of fixed assets and their gross value at December 31, 1995 and
1994 were as follows.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994
- ----------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Manufacturing facilities and equipment $2,958 $2,488
Construction projects in progress 808 293
Land 35 26
Leased assets and improvements 3 3
------ ------
Total fixed assets $3,804 $2,810
====== ======
</TABLE>
Repair and maintenance expenses for 1995, 1994 and 1993 were $133 million, $109
million and $101 million, respectively. The 1995, 1994 and 1993 amounts include
amortization of deferred turnaround costs of $13 million, $12 million and $15
million, respectively. Total interest cost incurred during 1995 was
approximately $86 million, of which approximately $6 million was capitalized.
11. LONG-TERM DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Long-term debt at December 31, 1995 and 1994 was comprised of the following.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994
- -----------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
9.95% Notes due in 1996 $ 150 $ 150
8.25% Notes due in 1997 100 100
10.00% Notes due in 1999 150 150
9.125% Notes due in 2002 100 100
LCR 5-year term credit facility 250 --
Medium-term notes 207 217
----- -----
957 717
Less current portion 150 10
----- -----
Total long-term debt $ 807 $ 707
===== =====
</TABLE>
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt during the five years subsequent to
December 31, 1995 are as follows: 1996-$150 million; 1997-$112 million; 1998-
$32 million; 1999-$150 million; 2000-$292 million.
In May 1995, LCR entered into two credit facilities totaling $520 million with a
group of banks with The Bank of New York as agent. The first facility is a $70
million, 364-day revolving working capital facility, which replaced LCR's former
$70 million revolving working capital facility, and is being utilized for
general business purposes
50
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
unrelated to the Upgrade Project and for letters of credit. At December 31,
1995, no amounts were outstanding under this credit facility. The second
facility is a $450 million, five-year term credit facility that is being used in
connection with the Upgrade Project. At December 31, 1995, $250 million was
outstanding under this credit facility with a weighted average interest rate of
6.4 percent. Interest for both facilities is based on prime or eurodollar rates
at LCR's option. The facilities contain covenants which require LCR to maintain
a minimum net worth which increases each year until 1998 and maintenance of
certain financial ratios defined in the agreements. The facilities also contain
other customary covenants which limit LCR's ability to modify certain
significant contracts, incur additional debt or liens, dispose of assets, make
restricted payments as defined in the agreements or merge or consolidate with
other entities.
The Company has a five-year, $400 million revolving credit facility ("Facility")
with a group of banks expiring June 2000. Borrowings under the Facility bear
interest at either the eurodollar, certificate of deposit ("CD") or prime rates
or based on a competitive auction feature wherein the interest rate can be
established by competitive bids submitted by the sponsoring banks, all at the
Company's option. The Facility is available for working capital and general
corporate purposes as needed and contains covenants relating to dividend
payments, debt incurrence, liens, disposition of assets, mergers and
consolidations, fixed charge and leverage ratios and certain payments to LCR. In
addition to other customary events of default, the Facility provides that an
event of default will occur (i) if the Company fails to pay when due an
aggregate amount of indebtedness or interest thereon (other than with respect to
loans under the Facility) in excess of $15 million, or (ii) if the Company is
determined to be in default of a material obligation under the amended and
restated limited liability company regulations of LCR. At December 31, 1995, no
amounts were outstanding under this Facility.
The Company retired $10 million of the medium-term notes during 1995 while the
remaining medium-term notes mature at various dates from 1997 to 2005 and have a
weighted average interest rate at December 31, 1995 and 1994 of 9.8 percent and
9.9 percent, respectively.
The Notes due 1996 and 1999, and the medium-term notes contain provisions that
would allow the holders to require the Company to repurchase the debt upon the
occurrence of certain events together with specified declines in public ratings
on the Notes due 1996 and 1999. Certain events include acquisitions by persons
other than ARCO or the Company of more than 20 percent of the Company's common
stock, any merger or transfer of substantially all of the Company's assets, in
connection with which the Company's common stock is changed into or exchanged
for cash, securities or other property and payment of certain "special"
dividends.
The Company also has uncommitted lines of credit totaling $265 million with
banks and other financial institutions. These uncommitted lines of credit
provide the Company with additional borrowing flexibility and potentially more
competitive interest rates. The Company can borrow money on these uncommitted
lines of credit on such terms as may be mutually agreed upon at the time amounts
are borrowed. The lines of credit can be terminated by the lenders, in their
sole discretion, on short notice. As of December 31, 1995, the Company had $103
million outstanding under these uncommitted lines of credit.
In February 1996, the Company issued $300 million of debt securities ("Debt
Securities") consisting of $150 million of 6.5 percent notes due 2006 and $150
million of 7.55 percent debentures due 2026. Proceeds received from the sale of
the Debt Securities are intended to be used for retirement of maturing debt and
general corporate purposes. The Debt Securities will be unsecured obligations
and rank on a parity with all other unsecured and unsubordinated debt of the
Company.
12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share were computed based on the weighted average number of shares
outstanding of 80,000,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993.
51
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
13. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Dividends - During 1995 and 1994, the Company paid regular quarterly dividends
of $.225 per share of common stock outstanding. During 1993, the Company paid a
regular dividend to stockholders in the amount of $.45 per share during the
first and second quarters and a regular dividend to stockholders in the amount
of $.225 per share during each of the remaining two quarters.
Rights to Purchase Common Stock - On December 8, 1995, the Board of Directors of
Lyondell declared a dividend of one right ("Right") for each outstanding share
of the Company's common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business
on December 20, 1995. The description and terms of the Rights are set forth in a
Rights Agreement dated as of December 8, 1995 as it may from time to time be
supplemented or amended ("Rights Agreement").
The Rights become exercisable upon the earlier of ten days following a public
announcement by another entity that it has acquired beneficial ownership of 15
percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock or ten business days
following the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer to acquire
beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of the outstanding shares of common
stock, excluding ARCO, except under certain circumstances.
The Rights expire at the close of business on December 8, 2005 unless earlier
redeemed at a price of $.0005 per Right or exchanged by the Company as described
in the Rights Agreement.
Preferred Stock - The Company has authorized 80,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $.01 par value, of which none were issued or outstanding at December 31,
1995.
Stock Options - The Company's Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTI Plan")
became effective November 7, 1988. The last stock options granted under the LTI
Plan were granted on March 4, 1994. No additional stock option grants will be
made under the LTI Plan. The LTI Plan provided, among other compensation
awards, for the granting to officers and other key management employees of non-
qualified stock options for the purchase of up to 1,295,000 shares of the
Company's common stock. The number of options exercisable each year is equal to
25 percent of the number granted after each year of continuous service starting
one year from the date of grant. The LTI Plan provided that the option price
per share was not less than 100 percent of the fair market value of the stock on
the effective date of the grant. As of December 31, 1995, options covering
948,256 shares were outstanding under the LTI Plan, of which 616,440 were
exercisable at a weighted average price of $22.82 per share. The following
summarizes stock option activity for the LTI Plan.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTION PRICE
NUMBER AVERAGE
OF SHARES PER SHARE TOTAL
---------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993 761,732 $23.39 $17,816,867
Granted 230,800 23.13 5,337,250
Exercised (7,036) 22.04 (155,091)
--------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1994 985,496 23.34 22,999,026
Exercised (2,743) 20.25 (55,546)
Canceled (34,497) 25.73 (887,531)
--------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1995 948,256 23.26 $22,055,949
========= ===========
</TABLE>
The Company's Incentive Stock Option Plan ("ISO Plan"), a tax qualified plan,
became effective January 12, 1989. The last stock options granted under the ISO
Plan were granted on March 5, 1993. No additional grants will be made under the
ISO Plan. All employees of the Company who were not on the executive payroll
were eligible to participate in the ISO Plan, subject to certain restrictions.
Various restrictions apply as to when and to the number of stock options that
may be exercised during any year. As of December 31, 1995, options covering
52
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
189,553 shares were outstanding at an average exercise price of $29.64 per
share. These options were held by 854 eligible employees. At December 31,
1995, 4,755 stock options were exercisable at an exercise price of $19.44. The
following summarizes stock option activity for the ISO Plan.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTION PRICE
NUMBER AVERAGE
OF SHARES PER SHARE TOTAL
--------- -------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993 214,519 $29.24 $6,273,421
Canceled/forfeited ( 9,804) 27.83 (272,799)
------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1994 204,715 29.31 6,000,622
Canceled/forfeited (11,120) 27.29 (303,472)
Exercised (4,042) 19.44 (78,576)
-------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1995 189,553 29.64 $5,618,574
======== ==========
</TABLE>
14. LEASES
At December 31, 1995, future minimum rental payments for operating leases with
noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year were as follows.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS AMOUNT
- ------------------------------- -------
<S> <C>
1996 $ 52
1997 51
1998 45
1999 33
2000 31
Thereafter 434
------
Total minimum lease payments $646
======
</TABLE>
Operating lease net rental expenses for 1995, 1994 and 1993 were $60 million,
$58 million and $47 million, respectively.
15. RETIREMENT PLANS
All Lyondell and LCR employees are covered by defined benefit pension plans.
Retirement benefits are based on years of service and the employee's highest
three consecutive years of compensation during the last ten years of service.
The funding policy for these plans is to make periodic contributions as required
by applicable law. Lyondell and LCR accrue pension costs based on an actuarial
valuation and fund the plans through contributions to pension trust funds
separate from Lyondell or LCR's funds. Lyondell and LCR also have unfunded
supplemental nonqualified retirement plans which provide pension benefits for
certain employees in excess of the tax qualified plans' limits.
The following table sets forth the funded status of Lyondell and LCR's
retirement plans and the amounts recognized in the Company's consolidated
balance sheets at December 31, 1995 and 1994.
53
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
---------------------------------------------------
PLANS WITH PLANS WITH PLANS WITH PLANS WITH
ASSETS IN ABO IN ASSETS IN ABO IN
EXCESS OF EXCESS OF EXCESS OF EXCESS OF
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ABO ASSETS ABO ASSETS
- ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of benefit
obligations:
Vested benefit obligation $ 64 $ 30 $ 46 $ 21
==== ===== ===== =====
Accumulated benefit obligation ("ABO") $ 65 $ 33 $ 49 $ 22
==== ===== ===== =====
Projected benefit obligation $100 $ 61 $ 77 $ 37
Plan assets at fair value, primarily
stocks and bonds 79 26 68 18
---- ----- ----- -----
Projected benefit obligation in excess
of plan assets (21) (35) ( 9) (19)
Unrecognized net loss 24 18 15 6
Prior service cost not yet recognized
in pension cost ( 3) 2 ( 3) 3
Remaining unrecognized net asset ( 3) -- ( 4) --
---- ----- ----- -----
Net pension liability $( 3) $ (15) $ ( 1) $ (10)
==== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
The Company's net pension cost for 1995, 1994 and 1993 included the following
components.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994 1993
- ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost - benefits earned during $ 8 $ 8 $ 5
the period
Interest cost on projected benefit 9 9 8
obligations
Actual (gain) loss on plan assets (20) 3 (14)
Net amortization and deferral 13 (10) 7
----- ----- -----
Net periodic pension cost $ 10 $ 10 $ 6
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
The assumptions used as of December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, in determining the
pension costs and pension liability shown above were as follows.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------------------ ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Discount rate 7.10 8.25 7.25
Rate of salary progression 5.00 5.00 5.00
Long-term rate of return on assets 9.50 9.50 9.50
</TABLE>
Effective July 1, 1995, Lyondell and LCR also maintain voluntary defined
contribution savings plans for eligible employees. Under provisions of the
plans, Lyondell and LCR contribute an amount equal to 160 percent of employee
contributions up to a maximum Lyondell or LCR contribution of eight percent of
the employee's base salary. Prior to July 1, 1995, Lyondell and LCR had similar
voluntary defined contribution plans. Lyondell and LCR contributions to all
plans totaled $9 million, $8 million and $8 million during the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
16. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
Lyondell and LCR sponsor unfunded postretirement benefit plans other than
pensions ("OPEB") for both salaried and non-salaried employees which provide
medical and life insurance benefits. The postretirement health care plans are
contributory while the life insurance plans are non-contributory. Currently,
Lyondell and LCR pay approximately 80 percent of the cost of the health care
plans, but reserve the right to modify the cost-sharing provisions at any time.
54
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following table sets forth the plans' separate postretirement benefit
liabilities as of December 31, 1995 and 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
-----------------------------------
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS MEDICAL LIFE MEDICAL LIFE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Retirees $ (4) $ (1) $ (3) $(1)
Fully eligible active plan participants (8) (5) (5) (1)
Other active plan participants (30) (7) (26) (5)
---- ---- ---- ---
(42) (13) (34) (7)
Unrecognized prior service cost (5) -- (5) --
Unrecognized net gain 3 4 2 --
---- ---- ---- ---
Accrued postretirement benefit liability $ (44) $ (9) $(37) $(7)
---- ---- ---- ---
</TABLE>
Net periodic postretirement benefit costs for 1995, 1994 and 1993 included the
following components.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994 1993
--------------- --------------------------------
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS MEDICAL LIFE MEDICAL LIFE MEDICAL LIFE
- ------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost - benefits
attributed to service $2 $2 $ 2
Interest cost on accumulated
postretirement obligation 2 $1 3 $ 1 3 $ 1
--- -- -- ---- ---- ---
Net periodic postretirement
benefit cost $4 $1 $5 $ 1 $ 5 $ 1
=== == == ==== ==== ===
</TABLE>
For measurement purposes, the assumed annual rate of increase in the per capita
cost of covered health care benefits as of December 31, 1995 was nine percent
for 1996, seven percent for 1997-2001 and five percent thereafter. The health
care cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the amounts
reported. To illustrate, increasing the assumed health care cost trend rates by
one percentage point in each year would increase the accumulated postretirement
benefit liability as of December 31, 1995 by $9 million and the net periodic
postretirement benefit cost for the year then ended by $1 million.
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was calculated utilizing a
weighted-average discount rate of 7.1 percent and 8.25 percent at December 31,
1995 and 1994, respectively, and an average rate of salary progression of five
percent in each year. Lyondell and LCR's current policy is to fund the
postretirement health care and life insurance plans on a pay-as-you-go basis.
17. INCOME TAXES
Significant components of the Company's provision for income taxes attributable
to continuing operations follow.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------ ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current
Federal $ 206 $ 106 $ 5
State 20 11 -
----- ----- ----
Total current 226 117 5
----- ----- ----
Deferred
Federal 4 13 2
State (1) (4) 5
----- ----- -----
Total deferred 3 9 7
----- ----- -----
$ 229 $ 126 $ 12
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
55
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of
the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 1995 and
1994 were as follows.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax liabilities:
Tax over book depreciation $ 139 $ 127
Deferred turnaround costs 10 10
LIFO inventory 5 7
----- ----
Total deferred tax liabilities 154 144
----- ----
Deferred tax assets:
OPEB obligation 16 14
Pension and other compensation 18 11
related obligations
Environmental reserve 6 6
Other 4 6
----- ----
Total deferred tax assets 44 37
----- ----
Net deferred tax liabilities $ 110 $ 107
===== =====
</TABLE>
The reconciliation of income tax attributable to continuing operations computed
at the U.S. federal statutory tax rates to the Company's effective tax rates
follows. During 1993, the Company increased its provision for deferred income
taxes by $3 million due to an increase in the federal corporate income tax rate
from 34 percent to 35 percent effective January 1, 1993.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994 1993
DESCRIPTION % % %
- ------------------------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. statutory income tax rates 35.0 35.0 35.0
State income taxes, net of federal 2.0 1.2 19.3
Company owned life insurance -- (.3) 3.8
Deferred tax liability rate change -- -- 15.6
Other, net .1 .3 (.6)
---- ---- ----
Effective income tax rate 37.1 36.2 73.1
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company has various purchase commitments for materials, supplies and
services incident to the ordinary conduct of business. In the aggregate, such
commitments are not at prices in excess of current market.
Depending on then current market conditions, breach or termination of the Crude
Supply Contract could adversely affect the Company. Although the parties have
negotiated alternative arrangements in the event of certain force majeure
conditions, including governmental or other actions restricting or otherwise
limiting LAGOVEN's ability to perform its obligations, any such alternative
arrangements may not be as beneficial as the Crude Supply Contract. There can
be no assurance that alternative crude oils with similar margins would be
available for purchase by LCR. Furthermore, the breach or termination of the
Crude Supply Contract would require LCR to return to the practice of purchasing
all of its crude oil feedstocks in the merchant market and would again subject
LCR to significant volatility and price fluctuations.
In connection with the transfer of assets and liabilities from ARCO to the
Company, the Company agreed to assume certain liabilities arising out of the
operation of the Company's integrated petrochemical and petroleum processing
business prior to July 1, 1988. In connection with the transfer of such
liabilities, the Company and ARCO entered into an agreement ("Cross-Indemnity
Agreement") whereby the Company agreed to defend and
56
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
indemnify ARCO against certain uninsured claims and liabilities which ARCO may
incur relating to the operation of the business of the Company prior to July 1,
1988, including certain liabilities which may arise out of pending and future
lawsuits.
ARCO indemnified the Company under the Cross-Indemnity Agreement with respect to
other claims or liabilities and other matters of litigation not related to the
assets or business included in the consolidated financial statements. ARCO has
also indemnified the Company for all federal taxes which might be assessed upon
audit of the operations of the Company included in the consolidated financial
statements prior to January 12, 1989, and for all state and local taxes for the
period prior to July 1, 1988.
In addition to lawsuits for which the Company has indemnified ARCO, the Company
is also subject to various lawsuits and proceedings. Subject to the uncertainty
inherent in all litigation, management believes the resolution of these
proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's financial
statements.
The Company's policy is to be in compliance with all applicable environmental
laws. The Company is subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations
concerning emissions to the air, discharges to surface and subsurface waters and
the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of
waste materials. Some of these laws and regulations are subject to varying and
conflicting interpretations. In addition, the Company cannot accurately predict
future developments, such as increasingly strict requirements of environmental
laws, inspection and enforcement policies and compliance costs therefrom which
might affect the handling, manufacture, use, emission or disposal of products,
other materials or hazardous and non-hazardous waste.
Subject to the terms of the Cross-Indemnity Agreement, the Company is currently
contributing funds to the cleanup of two waste sites (French Ltd. and Brio, both
of which are located near Houston, Texas) under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") as amended and the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. The Company is also subject to
certain assessment and remedial actions at the Refinery under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"). In addition, the Company has negotiated
an order with the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission ("TNRCC"),
formerly the Texas Water Commission, for assessment and remediation of
groundwater and soil contamination at the Refinery.
In July 1994, the Company reported results of an independent investigation
conducted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors regarding the
compliance status of two process waste-water streams under the applicable
Benzene National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants ("NESHAPS")
regulations and certain issues raised by an employee. Noncompliance with the
Benzene NESHAPS regulations and the related reporting requirements can result in
civil penalties and, under certain circumstances, substantial civil and,
potentially, criminal penalties. The Company has received a notice of violation
from the TNRCC regarding the two streams and paid a fine of $10,200. In
addition, the Company incurred approximately $2 million in capital costs in
connection with these waste water streams to achieve ongoing compliance with
the Benzene NESHAPS regulations.
The Company has accrued $17 million related to future CERCLA, RCRA and TNRCC
assessment and remediation costs, of which $2 million is included in current
liabilities while the remaining amounts are expected to be incurred over the
next two to seven years. In the opinion of management, there is currently no
material range of loss in excess of the amount recorded. However, it is
possible that new information about the sites for which the reserve has been
established, new technology or future developments such as involvement in other
CERCLA, RCRA, TNRCC or other comparable state law investigations, could require
the Company to reassess its potential exposure related to environmental matters.
In the opinion of management, any liability arising from the matters discussed
in this note will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated
financial statements or liquidity of the Company. However, the adverse
resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters discussed in
this note could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations
for that period without giving effect to contribution or
57
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
indemnification obligations of co-defendants or others, or to the effect of any
insurance coverage that may be available to offset the effects of any such
award.
19. SEGMENT INFORMATION
As discussed in Note 3, the refining operations of the Company were contributed
to LCR effective July 1, 1993. Prior to July 1, 1993, the petrochemical and
refining operations of the Company were considered to be a single segment due to
the integrated nature of their operations. However, these operations are now
considered to be separate segments due to the formation of LCR and the related
separate management and operations of that entity.
The petrochemical segment consists of olefins, including ethylene, propylene,
butadiene, butylenes and specialty products; polyolefins including
polypropylene, low-density polyethylene and HDPE; aromatics produced at the
Channelview petrochemical facility ("Channelview Facility"), including benzene
and toluene; methanol; and refinery blending stocks.
The refining segment, which is primarily composed of LCR operations, consists of
refined petroleum products including gasoline, heating oil and jet fuel;
aromatics produced at the Refinery, including benzene, toluene, paraxylene and
orthoxylene; lubricants, including industrial and motor oils; olefins
feedstocks; and crude oil resales. Crude oil resales consist of revenues from
the resale of previously purchased crude oil and from locational exchanges of
crude oil that are settled on a cash basis. Crude oil exchanges and resales
facilitate the operation of the Company's petroleum processing business by
allowing the Company to optimize the crude oil feedstock mix in response to
market conditions and refinery maintenance turnarounds and also to reduce
transportation costs. Crude oil resales amounted to $370 million, $296 million
and $401 million for years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
Consolidated sales to CITGO totaled $1.4 billion in 1995, $1.1 billion in 1994
and $864 million in 1993. No other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of
consolidated sales.
Summarized below is the segment data for the Company which includes certain pro
forma adjustments necessary to present the petrochemical and refining operations
as individual segments for periods prior to the commencement of LCR operations
on July 1, 1993. These adjustments relate principally to allocations of costs
and expenses between the two segments and are based on current operating
agreements between the Company and LCR. Intersegment sales between the
petrochemical and refining segments include olefins feedstocks produced at the
Refinery and gasoline blending stocks produced at the Channelview Facility and
were made at prices based on current market values.
58
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PETROCHEMICAL REFINING
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS SEGMENT SEGMENT UNALLOCATED ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1995
- ------------------------
Sales and other
operating revenues:
Customers $2,466 $2,470 $4,936
Intersegment 191 172 $(363) - -
------ ------ ------ -----
2,657 2,642 (363) 4,936
------ ------ ------ -----
Cost of sales 1,932 2,457 (363) 4,026
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses 84 61 $ 59 - - 204
------ ------ ----- ------ -----
Operating income $ 641 $ 124 $(59) - - $ 706
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Depreciation and
amortization expense $ 54 $ 30 $ 2 $ 86
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Capital expenditures $ 471 $ 505 $ 6 $ 982
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Identifiable assets $1,365 $1,212 $ 69 $ (40) $2,606
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
1994
- ------------------------
Sales and other
operating revenues:
Customers $1,783 $2,074 $3,857
Intersegment 190 198 $(388) - -
------ ------ ----- ------ -----
1,973 2,272 (388) 3,857
------ ------ ----- ------ -----
Cost of sales 1,520 2,164 (388) 3,296
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses 40 54 $ 43 - - 137
------ ------ ----- ------ -----
Operating income $ 413 $ 54 $(43) - - $ 424
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Depreciation and
amortization expense $ 44 $ 20 $ 1 $ 65
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Capital expenditures $ 39 $ 210 $ 3 $ 252
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Identifiable assets $ 925 $ 739 $ 49 $ (50) $1,663
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
1993
- ------------------------
Sales and other
operating revenues:
Customers $1,326 $2,524 $3,850
Intersegment 180 237 $(417) - -
------ ------ ----- ------ -----
1,506 2,761 (417) 3,850
------ ------ ----- ------ -----
Cost of sales 1,412 2,632 (417) 3,627
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses 37 48 $ 45 - - 130
------ ------ ----- ------ -----
Operating income $ 57 $ 81 $(45) - - $ 93
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Depreciation and
amortization expense $ 44 $ 13 $ 1 $ 58
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Capital expenditures $ 14 $ 54 $ 1 $ 69
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
Identifiable assets $ 719 $ 514 $ 37 $ (39) $1,231
====== ====== ===== ====== ======
</TABLE>
59
<PAGE>
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
20. UNAUDITED QUARTERLY RESULTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT PER SHARE ---------------------------------------------
AMOUNTS MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
- ---------------------------------------- -------- ------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1995
- ----------------------------------------
Sales and other operating revenues $1,174 $1,370 $1,249 $1,143
Operating income 222 237 183 64
Income before income taxes 202 215 159 42
Net income 127 135 100 27
Earnings per share 1.59 1.68 1.25 .34
1994
- ----------------------------------------
Sales and other operating revenues $ 824 $ 900 $1,037 $1,096
Operating income 54 71 124 175
Income before income taxes 34 51 105 159
Net income 22 32 66 103
Earnings per share .27 .40 .83 1.28
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information regarding executive officers of the Company is included in Part I.
For the other information called for by Items 10, 11, 12 and 13, reference is
made to the Registrant's definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, to be held on May 3, 1996, which will be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 1995, and which is
incorporated herein by reference.
61
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1 and 2 -- Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial
Statement Schedules: these documents are listed
in the Index to Consolidated Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.
EXHIBITS:
- --------
3.1 -- Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.*
3.1(a) -- Amendment No. 1 to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Registrant.+
3.2 -- Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant.+++
3.2(a) -- Amendment to the Amended and Restated By-Laws of
the Registrant.
4.1 -- Indenture, as supplemented by a First Supplemental
Indenture, between the Registrant and Texas
Commerce Bank National Association, as Trustee.**
4.2 -- Indenture, as supplemented by a First Supplemental
Indenture, between the Registrant and Continental
Bank, National Association, as Trustee.!
4.3 -- Indenture, as supplemented by a First Supplemental
Indenture, between the Registrant and Texas
Commerce Bank, as Trustee. [[[[
4.4 -- Specimen certificate.*
4.5 -- LYONDELL-CITGO Refining Company Ltd. $70,000,000
Credit Agreement.++++
4.6 -- LYONDELL-CITGO Refining Company Ltd. $450,000,000
Credit Agreement.++++
4.7 -- Lyondell Petrochemical Company $400,000,000 Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement.[
4.8 -- Rights Agreement between the Registrant and the
Bank of New York, as Rights Agent.[[[
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION:
10.1 -- Executive Supplementary Savings Plan.**
10.2 -- Amended and Restated Executive Long-Term Incentive
Plan.***
10.3 -- Supplementary Executive Retirement Plan.***
10.3(a) -- Amendment No. 1 to the Supplementary Executive
Retirement Plan.[
10.3(b) -- Amendment No. 2 to the Supplementary Executive
Retirement Plan.[[
10.4 -- Executive Medical Insurance Plan - Summary Plan
Description.***
10.5 -- Executive Deferral Plan.****
10.5(a) -- Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Deferral Plan.[
10.5(b) -- Amendment No. 2 to the Executive Deferral Plan.[[
10.6 -- Executive Long-Term Disability Plan.!
10.6(a) -- Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Long-Term
Disability Plan.[
10.7 -- Executive Life Insurance Plan.!
10.8 -- Supplemental Executive Benefit Plans Trust
Agreement.****
10.9 -- Restricted Stock Plan.+++
10.9(a) -- Amendment No. 1 to the Restricted Stock Plan.[[
10.10 -- Value Share Plan.+++
10.10(a) -- Amendment No. 1 to the Value Share Plan.[
10.10(b) -- Amendment No. 2 to the Value Share Plan.[[
10.11 -- Form of Executive Severance Agreement with
Executive Officers.+++
10.11(a) -- Form of Letter Amendment to the Executive Severance
Agreement.[
10.12 -- Form of Registrant's Indemnity Agreement with
Officers and Directors.*
10.13 -- Elective Deferral Plan for Outside Directors.****
10.14 -- Amended and Restated Retirement Plan for Outside
Directors.****
</TABLE>
62
<PAGE>
MATERIAL CONTRACTS WITH ARCO AFFILIATES:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
10.16 -- Joint Pipeline Use Agreement between ARCO
Chemical Company and the Registrant.*
10.17 -- MTBE Purchase, Transportation & Storage Agreement
between ARCO Chemical Company and the Registrant.*
10.18 -- Agreements Implementing Transfer of Pipeline
Rights from ARCO Pipe Line Company to Registrant.*
10.19 -- Conveyance (conformed without exhibits) between
the Registrant and ARCO.*
10.20(a) -- Cross-Indemnification Agreement between the
Registrant and ARCO and Amendment No. 1 to the
Cross-Indemnification Agreement.*
10.20(b) -- Dispute Resolution Agreement between the
Registrant, ARCO and ARCO Chemical Company.!!!
10.20(c) -- Employee Services Agreement between the
Registrant and ARCO.+
10.20(d) -- Investment Management Agreement between the
Registrant and ARCO.!!!
10.20(e) -- Form of Registration Rights Agreement between
the Registrant and ARCO.+
10.21(a) -- Immunity From Suit Agreement between ARCO and
the Registrant.*
10.21(b) -- Amendment to Immunity From Suit Agreement between
ARCO and the Registrant.***
10.22(a) -- License Agreement between ARCO
and the Registrant.*
10.22(b) -- License Agreement Amendment between ARCO
and the Registrant.***
10.23(a) -- Technology Agreement between ARCO
and the Registrant.**
10.23(b) -- Technology Agreement Amendment between
ARCO and the Registrant.***
10.24 -- Assignment of Patents and Patent Applications
between ARCO and the Registrant.**
10.25 -- Assignment of Technology Agreement, as amended,
between ARCO and the Registrant.**
OTHER MATERIAL CONTRACTS:
10.26 -- Asset Purchase Agreement (conformed without
exhibits) between the Registrant and Rexene
Products Company.**
10.27 -- Crystalline Polymers License and Block
Copolymer License between Phillips Petroleum
Co. and the Registrant.**
10.28 -- Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company
Regulations of LYONDELL-CITGO Refining Company
Ltd.!!
10.28(a) -- Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated
Limited Liability Company Regulations of
LYONDELL-CITGO Refining Company Ltd.++++
10.29 -- Contribution Agreement between Lyondell
Petrochemical Company and LYONDELL-CITGO
Refining Company Ltd.!!
10.30 -- Crude Oil Supply Agreement between
LYONDELL-CITGO Refining Company Ltd. and
Lagoven, S.A.!!
10.31 -- Asset Purchase Agreement between the
Registrant and Occidental Chemical Company. +++++
21 -- Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23 -- Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
24 -- Powers of Attorney.
27 -- Financial Data Schedule.
* Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-25407) and
incorporated herein by reference.
** Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K Report for the year
ended December 31, 1989 and incorporated
herein by reference.
*** Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K Report for the year
ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated
herein by reference.
**** Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K Report for the year
ended December 31, 1991 and incorporated
herein by reference.
! Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K Report for the year
ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated
herein by reference.
!! Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Interim
Report on Form 8-K dated as of July 1, 1993
and incorporated herein by reference.
</TABLE>
63
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
!!! Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1993 and incorporated herein
by reference.
+ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-3 dated as of May 5, 1994
and incorporated herein by reference.
++ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1994 and incorporated herein by
reference.
+++ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December, 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by
reference.
++++ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by
reference.
+++++ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Interim
Report on Form 8-K dated as of May 1, 1995
and incorporated herein by reference.
[ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1995 and incorporated herein by
reference.
[[ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1995 and incorporated herein by
reference.
[[[ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Interim
Report on Form 8-K dated December 8, 1995 and
incorporated herein by reference.
[[[[ Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-3 dated as of
January 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by
reference.
</TABLE>
64
<PAGE>
(b) Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial
Statements on page 40.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not
applicable or the required information is contained in the Financial
Statements or notes thereto.
Copies of exhibits will be furnished upon prepayment of 25 cents per page.
Requests should be addressed to the Secretary.
(c) Reports on Form 8-K:
The following Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter
ended December 31, 1995 through March 15, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date of Report Item No. Financial Statements
- ------------------------- -------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C>
December 8, 1995 5 None
January 31, 1996 5 None
February 6, 1996 7 Yes
February 15, 1996 7 None
</TABLE>
65
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY
THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
By: /s/ BOB G. GOWER
-----------------------------------------
Bob G. Gower
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS REPORT
HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND
IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ BOB G. GOWER Chairman of the Board and Chief March 15, 1996
- --------------------------- Executive Officer
(Bob G. Gower, Principal
Executive Officer)
/s/ WILLIAM T. BUTLER* Director March 15, 1996
- ---------------------------
(William T. Butler)
/s/ CURTIS J. CRAWFORD* Director March 15, 1996
- ---------------------------
(Curtis J. Crawford)
/s/ TRAVIS ENGEN* Director March 15, 1996
- ---------------------------
(Travis Engen)
/s/ STEPHEN F.
HINCHLIFFE, JR.* Director March 15, 1996
- ---------------------------
(Stephen F.
Hinchliffe, Jr.)
/s/ DUDLEY C. MECUM II* Director March 15, 1996
- ---------------------------
(Dudley C. Mecum II)
/s/ DAN F. SMITH President, Chief Operating Officer March 15, 1996
- --------------------------- and Director
(Dan F. Smith)
/s/ PAUL R. STALEY* Director March 15, 1996
- ---------------------------
(Paul R. Staley)
/s/ RUSSELL S. YOUNG Senior Vice President, Chief March 15, 1996
- --------------------------- Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Russell S. Young,
Principal Financial
Officer)
/s/ JOSEPH M. PUTZ Vice President and Controller March 15, 1996
- ---------------------------
(Joseph M. Putz, Principal
Accounting Officer)
*By: /s/ BOB G. GOWER March 15, 1996
----------------------
(Bob G. Gower, as
Attorney-in-fact)
</TABLE>
66
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES
Lyondell FSC, Inc.
Lyondell Mont Belvieu Corporation
Lyondell Petrochemical de Mexico, Inc.
Lyondell Refining Company
Lyondell Transportation Company
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Lyondell Petrochemical Company, Post Effective Amendment No. 4 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-26867), Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-31564), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-32683), and
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-60785) of our report dated February
12, 1996, except as to the information presented in Note 11, for which the date
is February 21, 1996 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Lyondell Petrochemical Company as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995, which report is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Houston, Texas
March 15, 1996
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 24
LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints
Bob G. Gower, Joseph M. Putz and Russell S. Young, and each of them, his or her
true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, in connection with any outstanding securities of
Lyondell Petrochemical Company (the "Company"), or any public offering or other
issuance of any securities of the Company authorized by the Board of Directors
of the Company, or by the Executive Committee thereof pursuant to due
authorization by such Board, (1) to execute and file, or cause to be filed, with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), (A)
Registration Statements and any and all amendments (including post-effective
amendments) thereto and to file, or cause to be filed, all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith as required by the Commission in
connection with such registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and (B) any report or other document required to be
1 of 4
<PAGE>
filed by the Company with the Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, (2) to execute and file, or cause to be filed, any
application for registration or exemption therefrom, any report or any other
document required to be filed by the Company under the Blue Sky or securities
law of any of the United States and to furnish any other information required in
connection therewith, (3) to execute and file, or cause to be filed, any
application for registration or exemption therefrom under the securities laws of
any jurisdiction outside the United States, including any reports or other
documents required to be filed subsequent to the issuance of such securities,
and (4) to execute and file, or cause to be filed, any application for listing
such securities on the New York Stock Exchange, or any other securities exchange
in any other jurisdiction where any such securities are proposed to be sold,
granting to such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act required to be done as he or she
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue of this power of attorney. Each person whose signature appears
below may at any time revoke this power of attorney as to himself or herself
only by an instrument in writing specifying that this power of attorney is
revoked as to him or her as of the date of execution of such instrument or at a
subsequent specified date. This power of
2 of 4
<PAGE>
attorney shall be revoked automatically with respect to any person whose
signature appears below effective on the date he or she ceases to be a member of
the Board of Directors or an officer of the Company. Any revocation hereof shall
not void or otherwise affect any acts performed by any attorney-in-fact and
agent named herein pursuant to this power of attorney prior to the effective
date of such revocation.
Dated: March 8, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
<S> <C>
/s/ Bob G. Gower Chairman, Chief Executive
- --------------------------- Officer and Director
Bob G. Gower
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Russell S. Young Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
- --------------------------- Officer and Treasurer
Russell S. Young
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Joseph M. Putz Vice President and Controller
- ---------------------------
Joseph M. Putz
(Principal Accounting Officer)
</TABLE>
3 of 4
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
<S> <C>
/s/ Dr. William T. Butler Director
- ---------------------------------
Dr. William T. Butler
/s/ Curtis J. Crawford Director
- ---------------------------------
Curtis J. Crawford
/s/ D. Travis Engen Director
- ---------------------------------
D. Travis Engen
/s/ Stephen F. Hinchliffe, Jr. Director
- ---------------------------------
Stephen F. Hinchliffe, Jr.
/s/ Dudley C. Mecum II Director
- ---------------------------------
Dudley C. Mecum II
/s/ Dan F. Smith Director
- ---------------------------------
Dan F. Smith
/s/ Paul R. Staley Director
- ---------------------------------
Paul R. Staley
</TABLE>
4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1995
<CASH> 10
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 340
<ALLOWANCES> 3
<INVENTORY> 265
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 678
<PP&E> 3,804
<DEPRECIATION> 1,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 750
<BONDS> 807
80
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 2,606
<SALES> 4,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 4,936
<CGS> 4,026
<TOTAL-COSTS> 4,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 204
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 80
<INCOME-PRETAX> 618
<INCOME-TAX> 229
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 389
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 389
<EPS-PRIMARY> 4.86
<EPS-DILUTED> 4.86
</TABLE>
