RJR NABISCO HOLDINGS CORP
DEFA14A, 1996-02-20
COOKIES & CRACKERS
Previous: RJR NABISCO HOLDINGS CORP, DEFA14A, 1996-02-20
Next: RJR NABISCO HOLDINGS CORP, PREC14A, 1996-02-20



				 SCHEDULE 14A
				(Rule 14a-101)
		    INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
			   SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

		   Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
		    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Filed by the Registrant  [x]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  [  ]

Check the appropriate box:
[ ]      Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]      Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
	 14a-6(e)(2)
[ ]      Definitive Proxy Statement
[X]      Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]      Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section
	 240.14a-12


			  RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp.

	       (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

			  RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp.

		  (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ]      $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2)
	 or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[ ]      $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
	 14a-6(i)(3).
[ ]      Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
	 0-11.

	 (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


	 (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


	 (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
	       computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:


	 (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:


	 (5)   Total fee paid:


[x]      Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ]      Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
	 Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
	 fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by
	 registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date
	 of its filing.

	 (1)   Amount Previously Paid:


	 (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:


	 (3)   Filing Party:


	 (4)   Date Filed:


			      [RJR Nabisco logo]
RJR Nabisco Logo

						   News Release

	 Contact:    Carol Makovich
		     (212) 258-5785


			    RJR NABISCO COMMENT ON
			     CONSENT SOLICITATION


	 NEW YORK, NEW YORK -- February 20, 1996 -- RJR Nabisco Holdings
Corp.  (NYSE:RN) said today, that pursuant to the procedures set forth in
its by-laws, an independent inspector of elections will review Brooke
Group's assertion that it received consents from shareholders representing
a majority of the company's voting stock on the spin-off and by-law
proposals.  The results of that review will be announced promptly upon
completion, which may take up to three weeks.

	       In addition, the company released the following statement from
Steven F. Goldstone, president and chief executive officer, regarding the
results of the consent solicitation:

		     "Whatever the final vote tally, what's clear to us is
	       that our shareholders have reiterated their support for what we
	       are already committed to: a spin-off of Nabisco.  It's a
	       message we take seriously.  We are committed to achieving a
	       spin-off as soon as we think we can be successful and we are
	       working towards that goal.  In the meantime, our management and
	       board of directors will seek to strengthen the company's
	       fundamentals and continue to explore other ways to make use of
	       RJR Nabisco's earnings and cash flows to reward our
	       shareholders.

		     "The vote does not change the board's fiduciary
	       obligation to protect all shareholders' interests.  In our
	       view, effecting an immediate spin-off is inconsistent with that
	       obligation.

		     "It's also important to keep in mind that an affirmative
	       vote on a non-binding referendum does not mean our shareholders
	       want to be bound to Bennett LeBow.

		     "As for the by-law vote, many of our institutional
	       shareholders have established voting policies regarding
	       corporate governance issues and we certainly understand their
	       reasons for supporting the by-law proposal.  We are confident
	       that these same shareholders will not allow LeBow or another
	       minority group to use this by-law to take advantage of the
	       company or its shareholders."

				     # # #


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission