AMERICAN ITALIAN PASTA CO
8-K, 1997-10-31
MISCELLANEOUS FOOD PREPARATIONS & KINDRED PRODUCTS
Previous: SYMANTEC CORP, S-8, 1997-10-31
Next: URBAN IMPROVEMENT FUND LIMITED 1972, 10-Q, 1997-10-31




                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                Washington, D.C. 20549

                                       FORM 8-K

                                    CURRENT REPORT

                  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
                                 Exchange Act of 1934


          Date  of Report  (Date of earliest  event reported):  October 29,
          1997

                            American Italian Pasta Company
                (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                   Delaware              001-13403         84-1032638
          (State or other jurisdiction  (Commission    (IRS Employer
               of incorporation)        File Number)   Identification No.)


          Address of principal executive offices: 1000 Italian Way
                                                  Excelsior   Springs,   MO
          64024

          Registrant's telephone number,  including area code:   (816) 502-
          6000 

          <PAGE> 

          ITEM 1.   CHANGES IN CONTROL OF REGISTRANT.

                         Not applicable.

          ITEM 2.   ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF ASSETS.

                         Not applicable.

          ITEM 3.   BANKRUPTCY OR RECEIVERSHIP.

                         Not applicable.

          ITEM 4.   CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT.

                         Not applicable.

          ITEM 5.   OTHER EVENTS.

               In  accordance  with  provisions  included  in  the  Private
          Securities  Litigation Reform Act of 1995, American Italian Pasta
          Company (the "Company") is filing  this Current Report on Form 8-
          K,  which  sets   forth  on  Exhibit  99   cautionary  statements
          identifying  significant factors that  could cause  the Company's
          actual  operating results  or  management's  plans to  materially
          differ from  those projected in  any forward-looking  statements,
          whether oral or written, made by or on behalf of the Company.

          ITEM 6.   RESIGNATIONS OF REGISTRANT'S DIRECTORS.

                         Not applicable.

          ITEM 7.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

            Exhibit No.  Document

              99         Certain cautionary statements for purposes of  the
                         "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities
                         Litigation Reform  Act of 1995 is  attached hereto
                         as Exhibit 99.

          ITEM 8.   CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR.

                         Not applicable.

          ITEM 9.   SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES PURSUANT TO REGULATION S.

                         Not applicable.



                                      SIGNATURE

               Pursuant  to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report  to be signed
          on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. 

                                        American Italian Pasta Company


          Date:  October 29, 1997       /s/  David E. Watson
                                             Executive  Vice  President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer

          


               The  Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform   Act  of  1995
          provides a "safe harbor"  for certain forward-looking  statements
          when such  statements  are accompanied  by meaningful  cautionary
          statements.  The management  of  American  Italian Pasta  Company
          ("Company";   "AIPC")  may   occasionally  make   forward-looking
          statements and estimates  (such as forecasts and  projections) of
          the Company's  future  financial  performance  or  statements  of
          management's   plans   and  objectives.   These   forward-looking
          statements may be contained in,  among other things, filings with
          the Securities and Exchange Commission and press releases made by
          the Company,  or  may  be made  orally  by the  officers  of  the
          Company. THE  COMPANY IS,  HOWEVER, UNDER NO  DUTY TO  UPDATE ANY
          FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT.

               Actual results of the Company's  operations could materially
          differ from  those indicated  in the forward-looking  statements.
          Therefore, no assurances  can be given that the matters indicated
          in such forward-looking statements  will be realized. Significant
          factors that could cause the  Company's actual results to  differ
          from those  indicated in the forward-looking  statements include,
          but are  not limited  to, the  factors  discussed below.  PERSONS
          EVALUATING   SUCH  FORWARD-LOOKING   COMMENTS  SHOULD   CAREFULLY
          CONSIDER THESE FACTORS, AND ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS HERETO,
          IN  ADDITION TO THE OTHER INFORMATION  CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S
          PUBLIC DOCUMENTS.

          DEPENDENCE ON MAJOR CUSTOMERS

               Historically, a limited  number of customers have  accounted
          for a substantial portion of the Company's revenues. During 1994,
          1995, the nine-month fiscal period  ended September 27, 1996, and
          the  year  ended  October 3,  1997,  Sysco  Corporation ("Sysco")
          accounted  for approximately 38%, 33%, 27% and 27%, respectively,
          and  sales to Sam's  Wholesale Club ("Sam's  Club") accounted for
          approximately  12%,  23%,  19%  and  22%,  respectively,  of  the
          Company's revenues. The Company expects  it will continue to rely
          on a limited number of  major customers for a substantial portion
          of  its  revenues  in  the  future.  Management  believes  that a
          majority of  the Company's fiscal  1998 revenues will  be derived
          from combined  sales to Sysco,  Sam's Club and  CPC International
          Inc. ("CPC"). The Company  has an exclusive supply  contract with
          Sysco  (the  "Sysco  Agreement") through  June  2000,  subject to
          renewal  by  Sysco  for two  additional  three-year  periods. The
          Company  recently entered  into  a  long-term  manufacturing  and
          distribution  agreement  with  CPC  (the  "CPC  Agreement")  that
          requires CPC to purchase a minimum of 175 million pounds of pasta
          annually  for  nine  years.  The  Company  does  not  have supply
          contracts with a  substantial number of its  customers, including
          Sam's  Club. Accordingly,  the  Company  is  dependent  upon  its 
          customers  to  sell the  Company's  products  and to  assist  the
          Company  in promoting market  acceptance of, and  creating demand
          for, the Company's products. An adverse change in, or termination
          or  expiration without  renewal  of, the  Company's relationships
          with or  the financial  viability  of one  or more  of its  major
          customers could have  a material adverse effect  on the Company's
          business, financial condition and results of operations.

               In addition,  certain  exclusivity provisions  of the  Sysco
          Agreement  and  CPC  Agreement prevent  AIPC  from  producing and
          supplying  competitors  of  Sysco  and  CPC  with  certain  pasta
          products.  Under the Sysco  Agreement, the Company  is restricted
          from  supplying pasta products  to food service  businesses other
          than  Sysco. Without CPC's consent,  AIPC may not produce branded
          retail pasta for Borden, Hershey Foods Corporation ("Hershey") or
          Barilla  Alimentare S.p.A.  ("Barilla"), and  is  limited to  the
          production of an aggregate of  12 million pounds of branded pasta
          products annually for other producers.

          MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CPC BUSINESS

               The  Company  has  experienced rapid  growth  and management
          expects  significant additional growth  in the future. Successful
          management of any such future  growth will require the Company to
          continue to invest in and enhance its  operational, financial and
          management information resources and  systems, attract and retain
          management  personnel  to  manage  such  resources  and  systems,
          accurately forecast sales demand and meet such demand, accurately
          forecast  retail sales, control its overhead, and attract, train,
          motivate and  manage its employees  effectively. There can  be no
          assurance that the Company will continue to grow, or that it will
          be effective  in  managing  its future  growth.  Any  failure  to
          effectively manage growth could have a material adverse effect on
          the  Company's  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations. 

               During  1998,  the  Company  will  be  required  to  produce
          substantially  all  of  CPC's Mueller's  brand  pasta,  which has
          averaged  approximately 200 million pounds of pasta annually over
          the last  five years.  To meet its  significant volume  and other
          obligations  under the  CPC  Agreement  and  provide  for  future
          growth,  the  Company must  successfully  complete  its 1997-1998
          capital  expansion  program  to  increase  its  overall  milling,
          production  and  distribution  capacity  by  approximately  100%.
          Implementation of the CPC Agreement may also adversely affect the
          Company's financial,  operational and human  resources. There can
          be  no  assurance that  the  Company's planned  expansion  of its
          production  facilities  will   be  completed  in  a   timely  and
          cost-effective manner or at all, or that such expanded facilities
          will  be adequate  to meet  the CPC  volume requirements  and any
          future  growth. Failure to complete the Company's planned capital
          expansion in a timely and cost-effective manner and implement the
          CPC  Agreement  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on the
          Company's  business,   financial   condition   and   results   of
          operations. 

          SUBSTANTIAL  PLANNED   INVESTMENTS  IN  MILLING   AND  PRODUCTION
          FACILITIES

               The Company has  begun a major expansion of  its durum wheat
          milling  and  pasta   production  and  distribution   facilities,
          budgeted to  cost approximately $86  million during the  1997 and
          1998  fiscal years, which  is planned to  increase AIPC's overall
          milling, production  and distribution  capacity by  approximately
          100%. There can  be no assurance that the Company will be able to
          complete this  expansion on  schedule, within  budget or  at all,
          that  the  expanded  facilities will  result  in  the anticipated
          increase  in production  capacity or  that  future revenues  from
          products produced at  the expanded facilities will  be sufficient
          to   recover  the  Company's  investment  in  the  expansion.  In
          addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able
          to calibrate its production capacity to future  changes in demand
          for its products  or that any future additions  to, or expansions
          of,  its facilities  will  be completed  on  schedule and  within
          budget. Any significant delay or cost overrun in the construction
          or  acquisition  of  new  or  expanded facilities  could  have  a
          material  adverse  effect on  the  Company's  business, financial
          condition and results of operations. 

          RAW MATERIALS

               The  principal raw  material in  the  Company's products  is
          durum wheat.  Durum wheat  is used  almost  exclusively in  pasta
          production and  is a narrowly  traded, cash only  commodity crop.
          The Company attempts to minimize  the effects of durum wheat cost
          fluctuations through forward purchase contracts and  raw material
          cost-based pricing  agreements with  many of  its customers.  The
          Company's  commodity  procurement   and  pricing  practices   are
          intended  to reduce  the risk  of durum  wheat cost  increases on
          profitability,  but  also may  temporarily  affect the  Company's
          ability to benefit from possible durum wheat cost decreases.  The
          supply and price  of durum wheat is subject  to market conditions
          and is influenced  by numerous factors beyond the  control of the
          Company, including general economic conditions, natural disasters
          and weather  conditions, competition,  and governmental  programs
          and regulations. The supply and cost  of durum wheat may also  be
          adversely affected  by  insects,  plant  diseases  and  funguses,
          including the karnal bunt fungus, which infected a portion of the
          durum  wheat produced in  the southwestern United  States in 1996
          and in  central Texas  in 1997. The  Company also  relies on  the
          supply  of plastic, corrugated and other packaging materials. The
          costs of durum  wheat and packaging materials  have varied widely
          in recent  years and future changes  in such costs may  cause the
          Company's  results  of   operations  and  margins   to  fluctuate
          significantly. A  large,  rapid  increase  in  the  cost  of  raw
          materials  could have a material  adverse effect on the Company's
          operating profit and margins unless  and until the increased cost
          can  be  passed  along  to  customers.  Following   a  period  of
          relatively stable prices  during the nine  months ended June  30,
          1997, the  market price of durum wheat increased by approximately
          23% from $5.60 per  bushel to $6.90  per bushel between June  30, 
          1997 and October 29, 1997. Historically, changes in prices of the
          Company's pasta  products have  lagged changes  in the  Company's
          materials costs. Competitive pressures may also limit the ability
          of  the Company  to raise  prices  in response  to increased  raw
          material costs  in  the  future. Accordingly,  there  can  be  no
          assurance as to whether, or the extent to which, the Company will
          be able  to  offset raw  material cost  increases with  increased
          product prices.

          COMPETITION

               The  Company operates  in  a highly-competitive  environment
          against numerous well-established  national, regional and foreign
          companies,  and many smaller companies  in the procurement of raw
          materials,  the development  of new  pasta  products and  product
          lines, the  improvement  and expansion  of previously  introduced
          pasta  products and product  lines and the  production, marketing
          and  distribution of pasta  products. Several of  these companies
          have   longer  operating   histories,   broader  product   lines,
          significantly greater  brand recognition  and greater  production
          capacity and financial and other resources than the  Company. The
          Company's   direct  competitors   include  large   multi-national
          companies  such as food industry  leader Hershey with brands such
          as San Giorgio(R) and Ronzoni(R),  and Borden with brands such as
          Prince(R) and Creamette(R), regional U.S. producers of retail and
          institutional pasta such as Dakota Growers Pasta Company ("Dakota
          Growers"),  a   farmer-owned   cooperative   in   North   Dakota,
          Philadelphia Macaroni Co.  Inc. ("Philadelphia Macaroni") and  A.
          Zerega's Sons, Inc. ("Zerega's"),  each an independent  producer,
          and foreign  companies such as  Italian pasta producers  De Cecco
          ("De Cecco") and Barilla.

               The   Company's  competitive   environment   depends  to   a
          significant extent on the aggregate industry capacity relative to
          aggregate  demand  for  pasta  products. Several  domestic  pasta
          producers have  recently completed production  facility additions
          or announced  their  intention to  increase  domestic  production
          capacity.  In  addition  to  AIPC's  planned  capital  expansion,
          management believes that these capacity additions represent  more
          than 200  million pounds  in aggregate.  Dakota Growers  recently
          increased the capacity of its  durum wheat mill and has announced
          plans to complete a pasta production capacity expansion in excess
          of 100 million pounds by the end of 1997.  Hershey recently added
          approximately 50 million pounds of pasta capacity to its facility
          in  Winchester, Virginia.  In September  1997, Barilla  announced
          plans to build a  pasta plant near Ames,  Iowa with an  estimated
          annual pasta capacity of over 200 million pounds. Two major pasta
          producers  have  also recently  announced  planned reductions  in
          pasta production capacity. Borden announced that it will close or
          sell five of  its ten North American  pasta plants by the  end of
          1997, and CPC intends to  eliminate its capacity of approximately
          180  million pounds  by the  end of  1997. Increases  in industry
          capacity levels  above demand  for  pasta products  could have  a
          material  adverse effect  on  the  Company's business,  financial
          condition and results of operations. 

               Several foreign  producers, based  principally in Italy  and
          Turkey,  have  aggressively  targeted the  U.S.  pasta  market in
          recent   years.  In   1996,  a   U.S.   Department  of   Commerce
          investigation revealed that several Italian and Turkish producers
          were engaging in unfair trade  practices by selling pasta at less
          than  fair  value  in  the  U.S.  markets  and  benefitting  from
          subsidies from their respective governments. Effective July 1996,
          the  U.S.   International  Trade   Commission  ("ITC"),   imposed
          anti-dumping and  countervailing  duties on  Italian and  Turkish
          imports.  While  such  duties  may enable  the  Company  and  its
          domestic competitors  to compete more  favorably against  Italian
          and Turkish producers in the  U.S. pasta market, there can  be no
          assurance that  the duties will  be maintained for any  length of
          time,  or that  these or  other foreign  producers will  not sell
          competing products in the United States at prices less than those
          of the Company. Such practices, if continued  or increased, could
          have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company's  business,
          financial  condition and  results  of operations.  Bulk  imported
          pasta,  and pasta  produced in  the  U.S. by  foreign firms,  are
          generally not  subject to  such  anti-dumping and  countervailing
          duties. Foreign pasta  producers generally may avoid  such duties
          by importing bulk pasta into the United States and repackaging it
          in  U.S. facilities for  distribution. A leading  branded Italian
          producer,   Barilla,  opened   a  bulk   pasta  repackaging   and
          distribution facility in Syracuse, New York in  1996 and recently
          announced plans to  build a pasta production plant  in Ames, Iowa
          for completion in mid-1998. In  addition, on August 28, 1997, the
          Department  of  Commerce  announced  that  it  is  conducting  an
          administrative review of its anti-dumping and countervailing duty
          orders  of July  1996 relating  to three  Turkish and  16 Italian
          pasta producers, including  Barilla and De Cecco.  The Department
          of Commerce indicated that it  intends to complete its review not
          later than July 31, 1998.  The Company cannot predict the outcome
          of the Department of Commerce's review.

          RELIANCE ON PASTA; PRODUCT LINE CONCENTRATION

               Since commencing operations in 1988, the Company has focused
          exclusively  on the  dry  pasta  industry.  For  the  foreseeable
          future,  AIPC expects to continue to receive substantially all of
          its  revenues from the sale  of pasta and pasta-related products.
          Because of this product concentration,  any decline in the demand
          or pricing for dry pasta,  any shift in consumer preferences away
          from dry  pasta, or any  other factor that adversely  affects the
          pasta market, could have a more significant adverse effect on the
          Company's business, financial condition and results of operations
          than on pasta  producers which  also produce  other products.  In
          addition,  the  Company's pasta  production  equipment is  highly
          specialized and is  not adaptable to the production  of non-pasta
          food products. 

          RELIANCE ON KEY PERSONNEL

               The  Company's operations and prospects depend in large part
          on the performance of its senior management team, including Horst
          W.   Schroeder,  Chairman  of  the  Board,  Timothy  S.  Webster,
          President and Chief Executive Officer, David E. Watson, Executive
          Vice  President and  Chief Financial  Officer,  Norman F.  Abreo,
          Executive  Vice  President  of Operations  and  David  B. Potter,
          Senior Vice President of  Procurement. No assurance can be  given
          that the Company would be able to find qualified replacements for
          any  of  these  individuals  if  their services  were  no  longer
          available. The loss of the services of one or more members of the
          Company's  senior management team  could have a  material adverse
          effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results
          of  operations. The  Company does  not maintain  key person  life
          insurance on any of its key employees. The Company has employment
          agreements  with Messrs.  Schroeder, Webster,  Watson, Abreo  and
          Potter.

          TRANSPORTATION

               Durum  wheat is shipped to the Company's production facility
          in Missouri directly  from North Dakota, Montana and Canada under
          a long-term rail contract with its most significant rail carrier,
          the  Canadian  Pacific  Rail System.  Under  such  agreement, the
          Company is obligated to transport specified wheat volumes and, in
          the event  such volumes are  not met, the Company  must reimburse
          the carrier for certain of its costs. The Company currently is in
          compliance with such volume  obligations. The Company also  has a
          rail  contract to  ship  semolina, milled  and  processed at  the
          Missouri  facility, to the  South Carolina facility.  An extended
          interruption  in the  Company's ability  to ship  durum  wheat by
          railroad  to the  Missouri plant,  or semolina  to the  Company's
          South Carolina facility, could have a material  adverse affect on
          the  Company's  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations. The Company experienced a significant interruption in
          railroad shipments  in 1994 due  to a railroad strike.  While the
          Company  would attempt to transport such materials by alternative
          means if  it  were  to  experience another  interruption  due  to
          strike, natural disasters or otherwise, there can be no assurance
          that the Company would be able to do so or be successful in doing
          so in a timely and cost-effective manner.

          PRODUCTION AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT

               Most  of  the  Company's  customers  use,  to  some  extent,
          inventory  management systems  which  track  sales of  particular
          products  and rely on reorders being  rapidly filled by suppliers
          to  meet consumer demand  rather than on  large inventories being
          maintained  by  retailers.  Although   these  systems  reduce   a
          retailer's investment  in  inventory, they  increase pressure  on
          suppliers  like the Company  to fill orders  promptly and thereby
          shift a portion  of the retailer's  inventory management cost  to
          the supplier.  The Company's  production of  excess inventory  to
          meet  anticipated retailer demand  could result in  markdowns and 
          increased  inventory carrying costs for the Company. In addition,
          if the Company underestimates the demand for its products, it may
          be  unable to  provide  adequate supplies  of  pasta products  to
          retailers in a timely fashion, and may consequently lose sales.

          POTENTIAL VOLATILITY OF FUTURE QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS

               The  Company's  results  of operations  may  fluctuate  on a
          quarterly basis  as a  result of a  number of  factors, including
          total  sales  volumes,  the  timing and  scope  of  new  customer
          volumes, the timing and amounts of price adjustments due to durum
          wheat  and  other  cost  changes,  the  cost  of  raw  materials,
          including durum wheat  (see the discussion under  "Raw Materials"
          above), plant expansion costs and interest expenses.

          RISK OF PRODUCT LIABILITY

               Although the  Company has never  been involved in  a product
          liability   lawsuit,  the  sale   of  food  products   for  human
          consumption involves the risk of  injury to consumers as a result
          of tampering by unauthorized third parties, product contamination
          or  spoilage,   including  the   presence  of  foreign   objects,
          substances,  chemicals, aflatoxin and  other agents,  or residues
          introduced   during    the   growing,   storage,    handling   or
          transportation phases. While the Company is subject  to U.S. Food
          & Drug Administration inspection and regulations and believes its
          facilities  comply in all  material respects with  all applicable
          laws and regulations, there can  be no assurance that consumption
          of the Company's products will not cause a health-related illness
          in the future or that the  Company will not be subject to  claims
          or  lawsuits  relating  to such  matters.  The  Company maintains
          product  liability insurance  in  an  amount  which  the  Company
          believes to be adequate. However,  there can be no assurance that
          the Company  will not incur claims or liabilities for which it is
          not insured or that exceed the amount of its insurance coverage.

          SUBSTANTIAL INFLUENCE OF CURRENT PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDER

               The  Morgan  Stanley  Leveraged Equity  Fund  II,  L.P. (the
          "MSLEF")  and Morgan  Stanley  Capital  Partners  III,  L.P.  and
          certain affiliated  funds (the  "MSCP Funds"  and with MSLEF  the
          "Morgan Stanley Stockholders") currently own approximately  32.5%
          of the  Company's  outstanding Class  A common  stock, par  value
          $0.001  per share  (the "Common  Stock").  The Company's  Charter
          provides that, if at any time after consummation of the Offering,
          the  Morgan Stanley  Stockholders own  in  excess of  49% of  the
          outstanding  Class  A Common  Stock, such  excess shares  will be
          automatically converted into an equal number of shares of Class B
          Common Stock. The  Morgan Stanley Stockholders are  affiliates of
          Morgan  Stanley,  Dean  Witter,  Discover  &  Co.  ("MSDWD"),  an
          affiliate  of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, a representative
          of the U.S. Underwriters, and Morgan Stanley  & Co. International
          Limited, a representative of the International Underwriters. Upon
          consummation of  the Offering,  three of  nine  directors of  the
          Company will be employees of  a wholly-owned subsidiary of MSDWD. 
          Pursuant to the  Stockholders Agreement (as amended  and restated
          effective upon the consummation of the Offering) among the Morgan
          Stanley Stockholders, the Company, and certain other stockholders
          of the  Company,  one of  the  Morgan Stanley  Stockholders,  The
          Morgan  Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund  II, L.P. ("MSLEF II"), has
          the  right to  designate two  director  nominees so  long as  the
          Morgan Stanley Stockholders own at  least 25% of the  outstanding
          Common  Stock or  one  director  nominee so  long  as the  Morgan
          Stanley Stockholders own  at least 10% but  less than 25% of  the
          outstanding  Common Stock.  In addition,  another Morgan  Stanley
          Stockholder, Morgan Stanley Capital Partners III, L.P.  ("MSCP"),
          has the right to designate  two director nominees so long  as the
          Morgan Stanley Stockholders  own at least 35% of  the outstanding
          Common  Stock or  one  director  nominee so  long  as the  Morgan
          Stanley  Stockholders own at  least 10% but less  than 35% of the
          outstanding   Common   Stock.   Whenever   the   Morgan   Stanley
          Stockholders collectively  own at least  5% but less than  10% of
          the outstanding Common Stock,  they shall jointly be entitled  to
          designate  one   director  nominee.   The  number   of  directors
          designated by  the  Morgan  Stanley  Stockholders  will  increase
          proportionately  if  the  size  of  the  Board  of  Directors  is
          increased  in the  future. In  addition,  so long  as the  Morgan
          Stanley  Stockholders own at least  25% of the outstanding shares
          of  Common  Stock,  certain  significant  corporate  actions  are
          subject to the approval of the  Board of Directors and the Morgan
          Stanley Stockholders. As a result of their ownership interest  in
          the  Company and their  rights under the  Stockholders Agreement,
          the  Morgan  Stanley   Stockholders  will  continue  to   have  a
          substantial influence over  the affairs of the  Company following
          the  consummation  of  the Offering,  including  with  respect to
          mergers  or other business combinations involving the Company and
          the   acquisition  or  disposition  of  assets  by  the  Company.
          Similarly, the Morgan Stanley Stockholders will have the power to
          prevent  or, by  selling their  Common Stock,  cause a  change of
          control of the Company and could take other actions that might be
          favorable to the  Morgan Stanley Stockholders. In  such instances
          or otherwise, various  conflicts of interest between  the Company
          and the Morgan Stanley Stockholders could arise. Stockholders may
          be prevented  from receiving  a premium for  their shares  if the
          Morgan Stanley Stockholders were to  act in concert to oppose any
          takeover attempt.

          FINANCIAL  LEVERAGE; SENSITIVITY  TO INTEREST  RATE FLUCTUATIONS;
          COVENANT RESTRICTIONS

               The Company  has reduced its  outstanding bank  indebtedness
          from approximately  $86 million on  June 30, 1997 to  $11 million
          representing   approximately   7%   of   the   Company's    total
          capitalization  as of the  date of this  current report. However,
          the Company intends to  substantially increase such  indebtedness
          in the future to finance its capital expenditure plan. The degree
          to  which the  Company is  financially  leveraged following  such
          borrowings and the terms of the Company's indebtedness could have
          important  consequences  to  stockholders,  including:  (i)   the
          Company's  ability to obtain  additional financing in  the future 
          for working  capital, capital expenditures, and general corporate
          purposes  may  be impaired;  (ii)  a substantial  portion  of the
          Company's cash flow  from operations may have to  be dedicated to
          the payment of the principal of and interest on its indebtedness;
          (iii)  the terms of such  indebtedness may restrict the Company's
          ability to pay dividends; and (iv) the Company may be more highly
          leveraged than  many  of its  competitors,  which may  place  the
          Company at a competitive disadvantage.

               As  of  the  date  of this  current  report,  the  Company's
          indebtedness had a  weighted average  interest rate  of 7.9%  and
          approximately  61%, or $11 million, of the Company's indebtedness
          bore  interest at variable  rates. Although the  Company used the
          net  proceeds of the Offering  to substantially reduce the amount
          of such indebtedness, the Company may incur additional amounts of
          variable-rate indebtedness in the future. If this  were to occur,
          and  if interest rates were to significantly increase thereafter,
          the Company's  operating results and  its ability to  satisfy its
          debt  service   obligations  may  be  materially   and  adversely
          affected.  The Company has  obtained an interest  rate protection
          agreement covering $20  million of variable rate  indebtedness to
          effectively limit  the Company's  exposure to  variable rates  by
          fixing the Company's base interest rate at 6.03%. There can be no
          assurance, however, that  in the future the Company  will be able
          to enter into such agreements.

               The  limitations contained in the agreements relating to the
          Company's credit facility,  together with the leveraged  position
          of the Company,  restrict the Company  from paying dividends  and
          could limit the  ability of the Company to effect  future debt or
          equity   financings   and   may  otherwise   restrict   corporate
          activities,  including the  ability  to  avoid  defaults  and  to
          respond  to competitive market conditions, to provide for capital
          expenditures  beyond  those  permitted or  to  take  advantage of
          business opportunities. 



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission