UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 0-20638
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(formerly known as Prudential-Bache Tax Credit Properties L.P.)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 13-3519080
-------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
625 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022
- - -------------------------------------- -----
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (212) 421-5333
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Beneficial Unit Certificates
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ____
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
Index to exhibits may be found on page 48
Page 1 of 55
<PAGE>
PART I
Item 1. Business.
General
Patriot Tax Credit Properties L.P. (formerly known as Prudential-Bache Tax
Credit Properties L.P. and herein referred to as the "Registrant"), a Delaware
limited partnership, was formed on May 3, 1989 and will terminate on December
31, 2029 unless terminated sooner under the provisions of the Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement"). The
Registrant was formed to invest in low-income, multi-family residential
complexes ("Apartment Complexes" or "Properties") and, to a lesser extent, in
historic apartment complexes undergoing rehabilitation ("Historic Complexes" or
"Properties") through the acquisition of interests (the "Local Partnership
Interests") in local partnerships (the "Local Partnerships") that are the owners
of the Properties. These investments were made with proceeds from the initial
sale of 38,125 Beneficial Unit Certificates ("BUC$"). The Registrant's fiscal
year for tax and financial reporting purposes ends on December 31 and March 31,
respectively.
The primary objectives of the Registrant are to provide the limited partners
with low-income housing tax credits allowed under Section 42 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Housing Tax Credits") over the credit period
for each Property in which the Registrant has invested and to a lesser extent,
historic rehabilitation tax credits allowed under Section 48(g) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Registrant invested only in Local
Partnerships that owned Properties which qualified for Housing Tax Credits. No
properties were acquired from any entity in which Prudential-Bache Properties,
Inc. or any affiliate had an interest. The Registrant's investments are composed
of limited partnership interests in Local Partnerships owning then newly
constructed or existing structures that have undergone substantial
rehabilitation. The Local Partnerships in which the Registrant has invested must
be operated in accordance with the low-income housing rules and regulations to
protect the related tax credits. It is not expected that any of the Local
Partnerships in which the Registrant has invested will generate any significant
cash flow to provide distributions to the limited partners.
The Registrant expects that in order to avoid recapture of Housing Tax Credits,
its holding period with respect to each Local Partnership Interest will be at
least as long as the 15-year compliance period and may be substantially longer.
Each Property in which the Registrant invested is substantially mortgaged.
However, the aggregate indebtedness did not exceed 85% of the appraised fair
market value of any Property at the time of acquisition. The first mortgage
financing encumbering the Properties was arranged by the general partner of the
Local Partnership (the "Local General Partner") owning the Properties prior to
the time the Registrant became a limited partner therein.
The Registrant acquired its Local Partnership Interest in each Local Partnership
by purchasing it directly from the existing limited and/or general partner of
the Local Partnership. In each of the Registrant's investments, the Local
General Partner of the Local Partnership owning the complex was required to
provide personal guarantees and/or establish cash escrows, financial bonds
and/or letters of credit to protect the Registrant against, among other things,
the failure to meet certain operating criteria.
The Registrant is engaged solely in the business of investing in Local
Partnerships that own Properties; therefore, presentation of industry segment
information is not applicable. For more information regarding the Properties,
see Item 2 Properties. For more information regarding
2
<PAGE>
the Registrant's operations, see Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
One Property had rental income which exceeded 15% of the Registrant's total
revenue. Rental income from Palm Beach Apartments Ltd. ("Summer Creek Villas")
as a percentage of the Registrant's total revenue was 53.45%, 43.8% and 47.5%
during the years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. In September
1997, the Local General Partner for Summer Creek Villas decided to divide the
apartment complex into two individual entities called the Arbors and the
Crossings.
No single tenant accounted for 10% or more of the Registrant's total revenue for
any of the three years in the period ended March 31, 1998.
General Partner
On October 1, 1997, as part of the settlement of class action litigation known
as Prudential Securities Inc. Limited Partnership Litigation, MDL No. 1005,
Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. ("PBP") withdrew as the general partner and
transferred its general partner interest in the Partnership to RCC Partners 96,
L.L.C. (the "New GP"), an affiliate of Related Capital Company ("RCC") pursuant
to a purchase agreement dated as of December 19, 1996 among PBP and its
affiliates and RCC ("Purchase Agreement"). Affiliates of RCC have in the past
provided and currently provide services to the Partnership and also serve as
co-general partners of four of the eight Local Partnerships in which the
Partnership has an interest. The Partnership's agreement of limited partnership
(the "Partnership Agreement") was amended to reflect this withdrawal and
admission and authorized PBP to transfer and assign its interest in the
Partnership to the New GP and to withdraw from the Partnership. The terms of the
transaction are more fully described in the Partnership's Information Statement
dated June 18, 1997 (the "Information Statement"), which was previously
distributed to all partners of the Partnership.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, P-B Tax Credit S.L.P. ("PBSLP") withdrew as
special limited partner of each of the Local Partnerships and was replaced by
Independence SLP L.P. (the "New SLP"), an affiliate of RCC. All special limited
partnership interests in the Local Partnerships were transferred to the New SLP.
Also pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Prudential-Bache Investor Services II,
Inc. ("P-B II") withdrew as assignor limited partner of the Partnership and was
replaced by Related Insured BUC$ Associates, Inc., an affiliate of RCC, (the
"New ALP"). All assignor limited partnership interests in the Partnership were
transferred to the New ALP.
The New GP is a Delaware limited liability company which was formed in July
1996, and is owned and controlled by the partners of RCC. The New GP will only
have a specified net worth, if any, as may be necessary for the Partnership to
be treated as a Partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Affiliates of the New GP and RCC have had significant involvement with the
Partnership and the Local Partnerships, of which five are owned by RCC
affiliates. During the acquisition phase of the Partnership's operation, among
other services, affiliates of RCC provided various services to PBP pursuant to a
Real Estate Consulting Services Agreement. These services included the
identification, evaluation, negotiation and closing of certain of the
Partnership's investments for which RCC was paid a portion of the acquisition
fees and expenses paid to PBP.
RCC in the past provided, and will continue to provide ongoing monitoring
services with respect to the Partnership's investments pursuant to the Property
Investment Monitoring Agreement for which RCC in the past received from PBP a
portion of the partnership man-
3
<PAGE>
agement fee payable to PBP and an annual expense allowance of up to $1,300 per
site visit (after the initial four site visits).
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the following changes were made to the
Partnership Agreement:
(a) amended to change the name of the Partnership to "Patriot Tax Credit
Properties L.P.", a Delaware Limited Partnership. The Partnership's new place of
business is 625 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022.
(b) amended to confirm that PBP continues to be party to the indemnification
provisions set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(c) amended to reflect (1) the reduction in the General Partner's maximum
participating interest in cash flow from 0.5% annually of invested assets to
0.375% annually; (2) the reduction by 50% of the General Partner's residual
interest in the Partnership comprised of (i) subordinated interest in
disposition proceeds and (ii) interest in distributions of sale or refinancing
proceeds; and (3) corresponding reductions in the General Partner's interest in
profits and losses. Finally, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, PBP and PBSLP
forgave all deferred and unpaid fees due to them by the Partnership and the
Local Partnerships. The aggregate amount of such deferred and unpaid fees was
$1,034,498 as of September 30, 1997 and is reflected in the Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital as a capital contribution.
Competition
The General Partner has formed various entities to engage in businesses that may
be competitive with the Registrant.
The Registrant's business is affected by competition to the extent that the
underlying Properties from which it derives tax credits may be subject to
competition relating to rental rates and amenities from comparable neighboring
properties.
Employees
The Registrant has no employees. Management and administrative services for the
Registrant are performed by the General Partner and its affiliates pursuant to
the Partnership Agreement. See Notes 1, 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial
statements set forth in Item 8.
4
<PAGE>
Item 2. Properties.
As of March 31, 1998, the Registrant holds interests in Local Partnerships which
own the following Properties which continue to be operated in a manner to
qualify for Housing Tax Credits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Registrant's
Low-Income
Occupancy Housing Tax Credit
Number Rents as of Rate as of for the Year Ended
Property (a) of Units June 8, 1998 June 8, 1998 December 31, 1997
- - ------------ -------- ------------ ------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RMB Limited Partnership 196 $385-$549 88% $ 395,768
(Hubbard's Ridge)
Garland, TX
Cutler Canal II 216 352-609 92 896,700
Associates, Ltd.
Miami, FL
Diamond Street Venture 48 473-540 90 282,288
Philadelphia, PA
Papillion Heights 48 380-450 100 173,661
Apartments L.P.
Papillion, NE
Hill Top Homes 171 465-670 81 616,545
Apartments
Limited Partnership
Arlington, TX
Palm Beach 770 546-758 96 2,241,161
Apartments, Ltd.
(Summer Creek Villas)
West Palm Beach, FL
Brookland Park Plaza 77 516 96 429,237
Limited Partnership
Richmond, VA
Compton Townhouses 39 635 92 205,620
Limited Partnership ---------
Cincinnati, OH
$5,240,980
</TABLE>
(a) At March 31, 1998, the Registrant holds a 66.5% interest in Summer Creek
Villas, a 98% interest in Hubbard's Ridge, Hill Top Homes and Compton Townhouses
and a 98.99% interest in Cutler Canal II, Diamond Street, Papillion Heights and
Brookland Park Plaza.
Hubbard's Ridge is comprised of seven separate three-story buildings on
approximately 6.5 acres. The buildings are wood-framed structures on
post-tensioned flat slab on grade foundations and have white stucco exteriors
with asphalt shingles on sloped roofs. Each building contains an average of 28
units. The unit mix consists of 164 one-bedroom units ranging in size from 657
square feet to 783 square feet and 32 two-bedroom units ranging in size from
1,145 square feet to 1,167 square feet.
The Cutler Canal II property is comprised of 216 units in 13 two-story
garden-style residential buildings on approximately 9.4 acres. It borders on a
Metro-Dade Water Management District Canal on the east with approximately 1,200
square feet of frontage giving certain units waterfront views. Each building has
a laundry room and two storage rooms. There are three basic
5
<PAGE>
floor plans with sizes ranging from 700 square feet for a one-bedroom apartment
to 1,100 square feet for a three-bedroom unit.
The Diamond Street property consists of 48 units in 16 buildings. The buildings
are three-story brownstone row houses with historic features and similar
layouts. Of the 48 apartment units, 46 are two-bedroom apartment units and two
are efficiency apartment units.
The Papillion Heights property consists of two buildings, each containing 24
units. The buildings are 2 1/2 stories of wood frame and brick exterior with
pitched roofs. Of the total 48 apartment units, two are one-bedroom units and 46
are two-bedroom units.
The Hill Top Homes property is comprised of a two-story building surrounded by
13 one-story fourplexes which are brick with wood siding and pitched roofs. The
buildings are surrounded by a security gate of brick columns and wrought iron
fencing with a guard house at the entrance. The unit distribution mix includes
171 apartment units of which 18 are three-bedroom/one bath apartment units each
containing approximately 925 square feet, 52 two-bedroom/two bath apartment
units each containing approximately 1,100 square feet, 98 two-bedroom/one bath
apartment units each containing approximately 936 square feet and three
one-bedroom/one bath apartment units each containing approximately 1,000 square
feet.
Summer Creek Villas consists of 61 concrete block and stucco buildings housing
770 apartment units situated on approximately 60 acres of residential-planned
unit development zoned land. 182 of the units are one-bedroom/one-bath
apartments, each containing 570 square feet; 372 are two-bedroom/one-bath
apartments, each containing 773 square feet; 144 are three-bedroom/two-bath
apartments, each containing 980 square feet; and 72 are three-bedroom/two-bath
villa units, each containing 1,050 square feet. In September 1997, the Local
General Partner for Summer Creek Villas decided to divide the apartment complex
into two individual entities called the Arbors and the Crossings.
The Brookland Park Plaza property is an existing three-level brick building and
is a registered historic landmark. The building is comprised of stucco and brick
exterior and a sloped red glazed tile roof. It is a 77-unit development with
68,564 net rentable square feet. All 77 units are one-bedroom apartment units
each of which contains approximately 890 square feet. Each unit contains a
refrigerator, range, carpeting and air-conditioning. Brookland Park Plaza also
maintains a community room for tenants.
The Compton Townhouses consists of six two-story buildings containing a total of
39 townhouse units. Four of the buildings contain six units; one building has
seven units; and one has eight units. All units have three bedrooms and
two-and-one-half baths. Total gross building area is 52,595 square feet; net
rentable area is 47,814 square feet. The average net area of the subject units
is 1,226 square feet.
For additional information describing the Registrant's properties, see Item 7
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Limited Partners
None.
6
<PAGE>
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's BUC$ and Related Limited Partner Matters
As of June 1, 1998, there were 2,259 holders of record owning 38,125 BUC$.
Additionally, the General Partner holds one BUC. A significant secondary market
for BUC$ has not developed, and it is not expected that one will develop in the
future. There are also certain restrictions set forth in the Partnership
Agreement limiting the ability of a limited partner to transfer BUC$.
There are no material restrictions upon the Registrant's present or future
ability to make distributions in accordance with the provisions of the
Partnership Agreement; however, the Registrant has paid no distributions from
operations or otherwise since inception. No distributions are anticipated in the
foreseeable future.
7
<PAGE>
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table presents selected financial data of the Registrant. This
data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of
the Registrant and the notes thereto set forth in Item 8.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years ended March 31,
------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATIONS 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Rental and other $ 9,517,723 $ 9,775,005 $ 9,783,022 $ 9,031,174 $ 9,212,457
income =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Interest income $ 51,349 $ 41,291 $ 49,257 $ 47,693 $ 75,242
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Interest expense $ 4,362,919 $ 4,428,530 $ 4,448,986 $ 4,474,229 $ 4,462,589
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Depreciation and $ 2,448,723 $ 2,517,547 $ 2,549,449 $ 2,640,262 $ 2,615,469
amortization =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
expenses
Loss on impairment $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,700,000 $ 0
of assets =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Loss before $(3,101,859) $(2,920,508) $(2,587,393)$(6,271,864) $(3,341,362)
minority interest =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Minority interest $ 428,961 $ 409,993 $ 421,144 $ 608,088 $ 496,042
in loss of local =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
partnerships
Net loss $(2,672,898) $(2,510,515) $(2,166,249)$(5,663,776) $(2,845,320)
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Net loss per $ (69.55) $ (65.19) $ (56.25)$ (147.07) $ (73.89)
limited partner BUC =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Total assets $68,835,813 $70,502,375 $72,944,919 $76,174,392 $81,370,985
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Mortgage notes $45,632,851 $46,099,028 $46,387,992 $46,529,512 $46,661,471
payable =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
8
<PAGE>
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Patriot Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the "Partnership") invested in eight Local
Partnerships that are owners of affordable multi-family residential complexes.
The Local Partnerships are operated in accordance with the rules and regulations
under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code in order to protect the related
tax credits. The Partnership's primary sources of funds is rental revenues which
are fully utilized at the property level. A working capital reserve ($11,000 at
March 31, 1998) is maintained to fund Partnership level expenses. The
Partnership is dependent upon the support of the General Partner and certain of
its affiliates in order to meet its obligations at the Partnership level. The
General Partner and these affiliates have agreed to continue such support for
the foreseeable future. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, PBP and PBSLP
forgave all deferred and unpaid fees due to them by the Partnership and the
Local Partnerships (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for
further information). The aggregate amount of such deferred and unpaid fees
totaled $1,034,498 and is reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Partner's Capital as a capital contribution.
At the Local Partnership level, certain Local General Partners and/or their
affiliates have made guarantees with respect to the Local Partnerships which,
under certain circumstances, require their funding cash flow deficits pursuant
to deficit guaranty agreements. These operating deficit advances do not bear
interest and are repayable by the Local Partnership in accordance with the
respective Local Partnership agreement. As of March 31, 1998, there is still an
operating deficit guaranty agreement in effect at Papillion Heights.
The Summer Creek Villas Local Partnership continues to experience severe cash
flow deficits. The maximum funding obligation of the Local General Partner for
the initial guaranty period under the Summer Creek Villas operating deficit
guaranty agreement (which expired on December 31, 1996) was $3,392,000, of which
$2,742,460 was funded. Of the total funded, the Local General Partner has
elected to treat $1,933,000 as non-repayable advances. The Local General Partner
is also obligated to fund operating deficits during a second guaranty period
which commenced August 1996 and expires July 1999. The maximum funding
obligation during this second guaranty period is $924,000. Through March 31,
1998, the entire obligation has been funded pursuant to this second guaranty
period. As of March 31, 1998, the financial statements of the Partnership
include $809,460 as "Due to general partners and affiliates of local
partnerships" for the two guaranty periods under the Summer Creek Villas
operating deficit guaranty agreement due to the three-month lag in recording the
financial information of the Local Partnerships. The Local General Partner is
currently reviewing different alternatives to improve property cash flow and
reduce operating deficits. Also the management agent has been replaced so as to
implement a new strategy for increasing property performance.
The Papillion Heights operating deficit guaranty agreement is in effect until
such date that the net operating income is sufficient to cover 115% of the debt
service for twelve consecutive months, as defined. Of the $170,000 maximum
funding obligation, $40,000 has been funded to date. In addition, the
Partnership's financial statements as of March 31, 1998 also reflect payables of
$150,000 under operating deficit guaranty agreements at Hubbard's Ridge and Hill
Top Homes, which have expired.
The Local Partnerships have generated net operating income before debt service
of $4,182,000 $4,489,000 and $4,816,000 for each of the three years ended March
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Debt service payments (interest and
principal) made during the same periods were $4,752,000, $4,425,000 and
$4,468,000, respectively.
9
<PAGE>
Capital Improvements
To better market the property, the Local General Partner for Summer Creek Villas
has decided to divide the apartment complex into two individual entities called
the Arbors and the Crossings. Of the total of 770 units in the complex, the
Arbors has 362 apartments and the Crossings has 408 apartments. In addition to
splitting the property in two phases, other improvements have primarily
consisted of painting and pressure cleaning of roofs, landscaping and individual
unit upgrades. Capital improvements at Summer Creek Villas have amounted to
approximately $423,000 through March 31, 1998. A portion of these capitalized
costs were funded through operating deficit guaranty funding obligations of the
Local General Partner. The remainder of these capitalized costs will be funded
by the Local General Partner through additional loans to the Local Partnership.
Results of Operations
The operating results of the Local Partnerships consolidated herein are for the
twelve-month periods ended December 31. Information disclosed below with respect
to each Local Partnership is consistent with this method.
Fiscal 1998 vs. Fiscal 1997
Rental income decreased approximately $522,000 for the year ended March 31, 1998
as compared to 1997 primarily due to decreases of $452,000, $42,000 and $63,000
at Summer Creek Villas, Cutler Canal II and RMB, respectively, due to lower
occupancies.
Other income (consisting primarily of application fees, forfeited security
deposits and operating deficit guarantees) increased approximately $264,000 for
the year ended March 31, 1998 as compared to 1997. The variance was mainly due
to the election by the Summer Creek Villas Local General Partner to treat
$1,000,000 and $678,000 of the operating deficit guaranty payments it made to
the Local Partnership for the years ended March 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively,
as non-repayable advances. These amounts were recorded on the financial
statements as other income during the respective years.
General and administrative expenses increased approximately $426,000 for the
year ended March 31, 1998 as compared to 1997 primarily due to increases at
Cutler Canal II, Summer Creek Villas and Hill Top Homes of $81,000, $242,000 and
$61,000, respectively, as a result of increases in salaries, advertising and
office supplies.
Property management fees decreased approximately $97,000 for the year ended
March 31, 1998 as compared to 1997 primarily due to a change in the managing
agent during May 1997 at Summer Creek Villas resulting in a decrease in fees.
Fiscal 1997 vs. Fiscal 1996
Rental income decreased approximately $316,000 for the year ended March 31, 1997
as compared to 1996 primarily due to decreases of $225,000, $66,000 and $41,000
at Summer Creek Villas, Cutler Canal II and Diamond Street, respectively, due to
lower occupancies.
Other income (consisting primarily of application fees, forfeited security
deposits and operating deficit guarantees) increased approximately $308,000 for
the year ended March 31, 1997 as compared to 1996. The variance was mainly due
to the election by the Summer Creek Villas Local General Partner to treat
$678,000 and $255,000 of the operating deficit guaranty payments it made to the
Local Partnership for the years ended March 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, as
non-repayable advances. These amounts were recorded on the financial statements
as other income during the respective years. This increase was offset by the
decrease in other income at Papillion Heights of $106,000 mainly due to a
$94,000 adjustment recorded in the year ended March 31, 1996 relating to an
operating deficit guaranty agreement.
10
<PAGE>
Operating and other expenses increased approximately $95,000 for the year ended
March 31, 1997 as compared to 1996. The variance was primarily due to an
increase of bad debt expense relating to uncollected rents at Summer Creek
Villas.
Repairs and maintenance increased approximately $101,000 for the year ended
March 31, 1997 as compared to 1996 primarily due to increases at Hubbard's
Ridge, Cutler Canal II and Hill Top Homes of $47,000, $30,000 and $18,000,
respectively, as a result of an increase in general maintenance and carpet
replacement costs.
Results of Operation of a Certain Local Partnership
Summer Creek Villas Local Partnership
Summer Creek Villas Local Partnership has experienced declining occupancy levels
over the course of the last few years, which has resulted in recurring losses
from operations and has adversely affected the liquidity of Summer Creek Villas.
In addition to the decline in occupancy levels, the Summer Creek Villas'
operations are further impeded by the inability to raise rents sufficiently to
pay for the increase in operating costs. Summer Creek Villas has been unable to
obtain maximum rents due to the competitive market and the fact that the rents
in the surrounding area are at market rate, competitive to the project. This
problem is further compounded by the increased costs in marketing the property
to effectively compete in the sub market. Further, rent levels are restricted
based on countywide median income levels, which limit the maximum income that a
prospective resident can earn and the maximum rents that the project is allowed
to charge. Summer Creek Villas has been further obligated, beginning in 1996, to
repay significant amounts of principal on its mortgage.
During 1997, in an effort to improve occupancy, the Summer Creek Villas invested
approximately $423,000 to improve the physical condition of the property. Such
improvements primarily consisted of painting and pressure cleaning of roofs,
splitting the property in two phases with separate club houses and leasing
offices, landscaping and individual unit upgrades.
Through a portion of 1997, the Local General Partner has been obligated to fund
operating deficits under two separate operating deficit guaranty agreements.
Total advances made by the Local General Partner under the operating deficit
guarantees totaled $2,742,460. In addition, the Local General Partner has made
voluntary loans in excess of its obligations under the guarantees to fund
operations of $668,589. As of March 31, 1998, the Local General Partner is no
longer required to fund operations of Summer Creek Villas.
The Local General Partner plans to attempt a restructuring of Summer Creek
Villas' debt, and is also exploring the possibility of raising additional
capital. However, as of March 31, 1998, no definitive agreements have been
reached regarding these plans.
As of March 31, 1998, the consolidated financial statements include total assets
of $36,986,624, total liabilities of $29,291,620 and a minority interest of
$2,675,515 attributable to this subsidiary.
Summer Creek Villas' ability to continue its operations is dependent upon
management achieving the plans described in the foregoing paragraphs. The
accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Any adjustments would be
limited solely to this subsidiary's financial statements included herein.
11
<PAGE>
Property Information
The Partnership currently holds interest in eight Local Partnerships. The
following schedule gives specific details about the related Properties.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Partnership's
Gross Carrying Occupancy Low-Income
Value of Rate at Housing Tax Credit
Number Property at December 31 for the Year Ended
Property (a) of Units March 31, 1998 1997 (b) December 31, 1997
- - ------------ -------- -------------- ------------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RMB Limited Partnership 196 $ 5,015,137 89% $ 395,768
(Hubbard's Ridge)
Garland, TX
Cutler Canal II 216 11,124,427 95 896,700
Associates, Ltd.
Miami, FL
Diamond Street Venture 48 2,870,124 96 282,288
Philadelphia, PA
Papillion Heights 48 2,206,424 81 173,661
Apartments L.P.
Papillion, NE
Hill Top Homes 171 8,103,088 85 616,545
Apartments
Limited Partnership
Arlington, TX
Palm Beach 770 40,832,871 81 2,241,161
Apartments, Ltd.
(Summer Creek Villas)
West Palm Beach, FL
Brookland Park Plaza 77 6,449,682 97 429,237
Limited Partnership
Richmond, VA
Compton Townhouses 39 2,445,632 100 205,620
Limited Partnership ---------- ---------
Cincinnati, OH
$79,047,385 $5,240,980
========== =========
</TABLE>
(a) At March 31, 1998, the Partnership holds a 66.5% interest in Summer Creek
Villas, a 98% interest in Hubbard's Ridge, Hill Top Homes and Compton Townhouses
and a 98.99% interest in Cutler Canal II, Diamond Street, Papillion Heights and
Brookland Park Plaza.
(b) Occupancies are calculated by dividing occupied units by total available
units.
There were no significant changes in occupancies at the above properties as of
June 8, 1998, except for increases at Papillion Heights and Summer Creek Villas
to 100% and 96%, respectively.
12
<PAGE>
Net operating income before debt service of the Local Partnerships for each of
the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1998 was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
------------ ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Hubbard's Ridge $ 196,000 $ 192,000 $ 292,000
Cutler Canal II 418,000 471,000 560,000
Diamond Street 55,000 54,000 102,000
Papillion Heights 108,000 113,000 214,000
Hill Top Homes 243,000 328,000 357,000
Summer Creek Villas 2,687,000 2,796,000 2,793,000
Brookland Park Plaza 337,000 377,000 351,000
Compton Townhouses 138,000 158,000 147,000
---------- ---------- ----------
$4,182,000 $4,489,000 $4,816,000
========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
Year 2000 Compliance
As the year 2000 approaches, an issue has emerged regarding how existing
application software programs and operating systems can accommodate this date
value. Failure to adequately address this issue could have potentially serious
repercussions. The General Partner is in the process of working with the
Partnership's service providers to prepare for the year 2000. Based on
information currently available, the Partnership does not expect that it will
incur significant operating expenses or be required to incur material costs to
be year 2000 compliant.
13
<PAGE>
Item 8. Financial
and Supplementary Data.
Sequential
Page
----------
(a) 1. Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report 15
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
as of March 31, 1998 and 1997 32
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 33
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Partners' Capital for the years ended March
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 34
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 35
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 36
14
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners of
Patriot Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(formerly known as Prudential-Bache Tax Credit Properties L.P.)
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition
of Patriot Tax Credit Properties L.P. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 1998 and
1997 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners'
capital and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of the
consolidated subsidiaries, which statements reflect total assets of $68,716,116
and $70,274,405 as of March 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and total revenues
of $9,563,471, $9,809,626 and $9,821,070 for the years ended March 31, 1998,
1997 and 1996, respectively. These statements were audited by other auditors
whose reports thereon have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it
relates to the amounts included for the consolidated subsidiaries, is based
solely on the reports of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and
the reports of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of the other auditors, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Patriot Tax Credit Properties L.P.
and Subsidiaries at March 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The auditors' report on the 1997 financial statements of a subsidiary included
an explanatory paragraph describing conditions that raised substantial doubt
regarding its ability to continue as a going concern, as discussed in Note 8 to
the consolidated financial statements.
/s/ ANCHIN, BLOCK & ANCHIN LLP
ANCHIN, BLOCK & ANCHIN LLP
New York, New York
May 14, 1998
15
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Dickey & Wolf, LLC]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To The Partners
RMB Limited Partnership
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of RMB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (a
Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
statements of operations, partners' equity/(deficit) and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of RMB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Dickey & Wolf, LLC
DICKEY & WOLF, LLC
Certified Public Accountants
Harrisonville, MO
January 28, 1998
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Cutler Canal II Associates, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cutler Canal II
Associates, Ltd., as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related statements
of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Cutler Canal II Associates,
Ltd., as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations, and
its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 17
and 18 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required
part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to
the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements
and, in our opinion, if fairly stated in all material respects in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Atlanta, Georgia
February 9, 1998
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To The Partners
Cutler Canal II Associates, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cutler Canal II Associates,
Ltd. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Cutler Canal II Associates,
Ltd. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
/s/ REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
Charlotte, North Carolina
January 20, 1997
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Ziner & Company, P.C.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners of
Diamond Street Venture
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Diamond Street Venture
(a Pennsylvania limited partnership) as of December 31, 1997 and the related
statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the
year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit. The financial statements of Diamond Street Venture as of December 31,
1996, were audited by other auditors, whose report dated February 14, 1997,
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Diamond Street Venture as of
December 31, 1997, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ziner & Company, P.C.
February 1, 1998
Boston, Massachusetts
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of J.H. Williams & Co., LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To The Partners of
Diamond Street Venture (a Limited Partnership)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Diamond Street Venture (a
Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
statements of loss, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Diamond Street Venture (a
Limited Partnership) at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its
operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ J.H. WILLIAMS & CO., LLP
J.H. WILLIAMS & CO., LLP
Kingston, Pennsylvania
February 14, 1997
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Cohen, Covey and Schultz, P.C.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
January 30, 1998
To the Partners
Papillion Heights Apartments, L.P.
(A Limited Partnership)
Springfield, Missouri
We have audited the balance sheets of Papillion Heights Apartments, L.P. (a
limited partnership), as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Papillion Heights Apartments,
L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Cohen, Covey and Schultz, P.C.
Springfield, Missouri
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Cohen, Covey and Schultz, P.C.--Springfield, Missouri]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To The Partners
Papillion Heights Apartments, L.P.
(A Limited Partnership)
Springfield, Missouri
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Papillion Heights Apartments,
L.P. (a limited partnership), as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Papillion Heights Apartments, L.P.
(a limited partnership) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ COHEN, COVEY AND SCHULTZ, P.C.
COHEN, COVEY AND SCHULTZ, P.C.
January 31, 1997
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Dickey & Wolf, LLC]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Hill Top Homes Apartments Limited Partnership
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of HILL TOP HOMES APARTMENTS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, (a Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related statement of operations, partners' equity/(deficit) and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of HILL TOP HOMES APARTMENTS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Dickey & Wolf, LLC
DICKEY & WOLF, LLC
Certified Public Accountants
Harrisonville, MO
January 28, 1998
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Palm Beach Apartments, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Palm Beach Apartments, Ltd.
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Palm Beach Apartments, Ltd., as
of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations, and its cash
flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Partnership will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note B to the
financial statements, the Partnership has suffered recurring losses from
operations and has a capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt regarding
its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in connection
with these matters is also described in Note B. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 19
and 20 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required
part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to
the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements
and, in our opinion, if fairly stated in all material respects in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Atlanta, Georgia
February 19, 1998
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To The Partners
Palm Beach Apartments, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Palm Beach Apartments, Ltd.
as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Palm Beach Apartments, Ltd. as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
Charlotte, North Carolina
January 24, 1997, Except for Note F, as to which the
date is February 28, 1997
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Brookland Park Plaza
Limited Partnership as of December 31, 1997, and the related statements of
profit and loss (on HUD Form No. 92410), partners' equity and cash flows for the
year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 1997, and the results of its operations, the
changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 19
through 24 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial
statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
<PAGE>
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the "Consolidated
Audit Guide for Audits of HUD Programs," we have also issued reports dated
January 20, 1998 on our consideration of Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership's internal control and on its compliance with specific requirements
applicable to major HUD programs, fair housing and non-discrimination, and laws
and regulations applicable to the financial statements.
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Bethesda, Maryland Federal Employer
January 20, 1998 Identification Number:
52-1088612
Audit Principal: Renee G. Scruggs
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To The Partners
Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 1996, and the related statements of profit and
loss (on HUD Form No. 92410), partners' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 1996, and the results of its operations, the
changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 19 through 24
is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of
the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and,
in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the "Consolidated Audit
Guide for Audits of HUD Programs," we have also issued reports dated February 6,
1997 on our consideration of Brookland Park Plaza Limited Partnership's internal
control structure and on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to
major HUD programs, affirmative fair housing, and laws and regulations
applicable to the financial statements.
/s/ REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
Federal Employer
Identification Number
52-1088612
Bethesda, Maryland
February 6, 1997
Audit Principal: Renee G. Scruggs
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To The Partners
Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 1995, and the related statements of profit and
loss (on HUD Form No. 92410), partners' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 1995, and the results of its operations, the
changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 19 through 24
is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of
the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and,
in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports
dated February 8, 1996 on our consideration of Brookland Park Plaza Limited
Partnership's internal control structure and on its compliance with specific
requirements applicable to major HUD programs, affirmative fair housing, and
laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.
/s/ REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
Federal Employer
Identification Number
52-1088612
Bethesda, Maryland
February 8, 1996
Audit Principal: Renee G. Scruggs
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Spaeth & Batterberry, Ltd.]
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
To the Partners
Compton Townhouses Limited Partnership
(An Ohio Limited Partnership)
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Compton Townhouses
Limited Partnership (An Ohio Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital,
and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Compton Townhouses Limited
Partnership (An Ohio Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Spaeth & Batterberry, Ltd.
February 2, 1998
Cincinnati, Ohio
<PAGE>
[Letterhead of Spaeth & Batterberry, Ltd.-Cincinnati, Ohio]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To The Partners
Compton Townhouses Limited Partnership
(An Ohio Limited Partnership)
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Compton Townhouses Limited
Partnership (An Ohio Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the
years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Compton Townhouses Limited
Partnership (An Ohio Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the results of its operation and its cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ SPAETH & BATTERBERRY, LTD.
SPAETH & BATTERBERRY, LTD.
February 3, 1997
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31,
---------------------------
1998 1997
---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Investment in property:
Land $ 4,005,633 $ 4,005,633
Building and improvements 75,041,752 74,583,558
Accumulated depreciation (15,450,304) (13,283,832)
------------ ------------
Net investment in property 63,597,081 65,305,359
Cash and cash equivalents 573,775 839,134
Cash and cash equivalents held in escrow 1,550,131 903,486
Deferred financing costs, net 2,861,272 3,136,727
Other assets 253,554 317,669
------------ ------------
Total assets $ 68,835,813 $ 70,502,375
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Liabilities:
Mortgage notes payable $ 45,632,851 $ 46,099,028
Accrued interest payable 1,492,961 1,266,943
Other accrued expenses and liabilities 1,411,705 1,265,302
Due to general partners and affiliates of local partnerships 2,558,522 1,654,598
Development fees payable 1,579,709 1,579,709
Construction costs payable 605,358 605,358
Real estate taxes payable 498,390 118,195
Due to General Partner and its affiliates 59,930 848,543
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 53,839,426 53,437,676
------------ ------------
Minority interests in local partnerships 2,872,312 3,302,224
------------ ------------
Partners' capital:
Limited partners (38,125 BUC$ issued and outstanding) 11,314,733 13,966,449
General partner (1 BUC issued and outstanding) 809,342 (203,974)
------------ ------------
Total partners' capital 12,124,075 13,762,475
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and partners' capital $ 68,835,813 $ 70,502,375
============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
16
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended March 31,
-----------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues
Rental income $ 7,958,742 $ 8,480,496 $ 8,796,928
Other income 1,558,981 1,294,509 986,094
Interest income 51,349 41,291 49,257
----------- ----------- -----------
9,569,072 9,816,296 9,832,279
----------- ----------- -----------
Expenses
Interest 4,362,919 4,428,530 4,448,986
Depreciation and amortization 2,448,723 2,517,547 2,549,449
Operating and other 907,657 975,906 880,740
Taxes and insurance 1,134,224 1,210,641 1,180,035
Repairs and maintenance 1,297,005 1,399,907 1,299,154
General and administrative 1,855,565 1,429,859 1,355,389
Property management fees 385,127 481,839 445,054
Partnership management fees 279,711 292,575 260,865
----------- ----------- -----------
12,670,931 12,736,804 12,419,672
----------- ----------- -----------
Loss before minority interest (3,101,859) (2,920,508) (2,587,393)
Minority interest in loss of local partnerships 428,961 409,993 421,144
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss $(2,672,898) $(2,510,515) $(2,166,249)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net loss
Limited partners $(2,651,716) $(2,485,410) $(2,144,587)
=========== =========== ===========
General partner $ (21,182) $ (25,105) $ (21,662)
=========== =========== ===========
Net loss per limited partner BUC $ (69.55) $ (65.19) $ (56.25)
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
17
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Limited General
Total Partners Partner BUC$
----- -------- -------- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Partners' capital (deficit) -
March 31, 1995 $18,439,239 $18,596,446 $(157,207) 38,126
Net loss (2,166,249) (2,144,587) (21,662) 0
----------- ----------- --------- --------
Partners' capital (deficit) -
March 31, 1996 16,272,990 16,451,859 (178,869) 38,126
Net loss (2,510,515) (2,485,410) (25,105) 0
----------- ----------- --------- --------
Partners' capital (deficit) -
March 31, 1997 13,762,475 13,966,449 (203,974) 38,126
Capital contribution 1,034,498 0 1,034,498 0
Net loss (2,672,898) (2,651,716) (21,182) 0
----------- ----------- --------- --------
Partners' capital
March 31, 1998 $12,124,075 $11,314,733 $ 809,342 38,126
=========== =========== ========== ======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
18
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended March 31,
-----------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $(2,672,898) $(2,510,515) $(2,166,249)
---------- ---------- ----------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
(used in) provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization 2,448,723 2,517,547 2,549,449
Minority interest in loss of local partnerships (428,961) (409,993) (421,144)
Forgiveness of debt (154,500) (154,500) (154,500)
(Increase) decrease in cash held in escrow (646,645) (290,421) 662,504
Increase (decrease) in real estate taxes payable 380,195 30,906 (378,829)
Increase in accrued interest payable 226,018 222,831 54,071
Decrease (increase) in other assets 57,319 42,421 (172,003)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities 692,663 667,691 (121,302)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total adjustments 2,574,812 2,626,482 2,018,246
---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (98,086) 115,967 (148,003)
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investments in property (458,194) 0 0
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from financing activities
Payments on mortgage notes (466,177) (288,964) (141,520)
Advances from local general partners 758,049 100,000 100,000
Payments for loans from local general partners 0 (100,000) 0
Distribution to minority interest (951) 0 0
---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 290,921 (288,964) (41,520)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (265,359) (172,997) (189,523)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 839,134 1,012,131 1,201,654
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 573,775 $ 839,134 $1,012,131
========== ========== =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid $4,286,125 $ 4,136,059 $4,325,996
========== ========== =========
Noncash financing activity:
Capital contribution resulting from forgiveness
of debt by General Partner and its affiliates $1,034,498 $ 0 $ 0
========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
19
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
NOTE 1 - General
Patriot Tax Credit Properties L.P. (formerly known as Prudential-Bache Tax
Credit Properties L.P.), a Delaware limited partnership (the "Partnership"), was
formed on May 3, 1989, and will terminate on December 31, 2029, unless
terminated sooner under the provisions of the Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement"). The Partnership was formed to
invest as a limited partner in other partnerships ("Local Partnerships" or
"subsidiaries") owning apartment complexes ("Apartment Complexes" or
"Properties") that are eligible for the low-income housing tax credit or the
historic rehabilitation tax credit. The general partner of the Partnership, from
inception to September 30, 1997, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the "General
Partner" or "PBP"), is not affiliated with a general partner of any Local
Partnership ("Local General Partner"). P.B. Tax Credit S.L.P. ("PBSLP"), an
affiliate of PBP, acted as special limited partner of each Local Partnership
entitling it to certain rights with respect to the operation and management of
each Local Partnership. At March 31, 1998, the Partnership has investments in
eight Local Partnerships.
On October 1, 1997, as part of the settlement of class action litigation known
as Prudential Securities Inc. Limited Partnership Litigation, MDL No. 1005, PBP
withdrew as the General Partner and transferred its general partner interest in
the Partnership to RCC Partners 96, L.L.C. (the "New GP" or "General Partner"),
an affiliate of Related Capital Company ("RCC") pursuant to a purchase agreement
dated as of December 19, 1996 among PBP and its affiliates and RCC ("Purchase
Agreement"). Affiliates of RCC have in the past provided and currently provide
services to the Partnership and also serve as co-general partners of five of the
eight Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has an interest. The
Partnership's agreement of limited partnership (the "Partnership Agreement") was
amended to reflect this withdrawal and admission and authorized PBP to transfer
and assign its interest in the Partnership to the New GP and to withdraw from
the Partnership. The terms of the transaction are more fully described in the
Partnership's Information Statement dated June 18, 1997 (the "Information
Statement"), which was previously distributed to all partners of the
Partnership.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, PBSLP withdrew as special limited partner of
each of the Local Partnerships and was replaced by Independence SLP L.P. (the
"New SLP"), an affiliate of RCC. All special limited partnership interests in
the Local Partnerships were transferred to the New SLP. Also pursuant to the
Purchase Agreement, Prudential-Bache Investor Services II, Inc. ("P-B II")
withdrew as assignor limited partner of the Partnership and was replaced by
Related Insured BUC$ Associates, Inc., an affiliate of RCC, (the "New ALP"). All
assignor limited partnership interests in the Partnership were transferred to
the New ALP.
The New GP is a Delaware limited liability company which was formed in July
1996, and is owned and controlled by the partners of RCC. The New GP will only
have a specified net worth, if any, as may be necessary for the Partnership to
be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Affiliates of the New GP and RCC have had significant involvement with the
Partnership and the Local Partnerships, of which five are owned by RCC
affiliates. During the acquisition phase of the Partnership's operation, among
other services, affiliates of RCC provided various services to PBP pursuant to a
Real Estate Consulting Services Agreement. These services included the
identification, evaluation, negotiation and closing of certain of the
Partnership's
20
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
investments for which RCC was paid a portion of the acquisition fees and
expenses paid to PBP.
RCC in the past provided, and will continue to provide ongoing monitoring
services with respect to the Partnership's investments pursuant to the Property
Investment Monitoring Agreement for which RCC in the past received from PBP a
portion of the partnership management fee payable to PBP and an annual expense
allowance of up to $1,300 per site visit (after the initial four site visits).
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the following changes were made to the
Partnership Agreement:
(a) amended to change the name of the Partnership to "Patriot Tax Credit
Properties L.P.", a Delaware Limited Partnership.
(b) amended to confirm that PBP continues to be party to the indemnification
provisions set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(c) amended to reflect (1) the reduction in the General Partner's maximum
participating interest in cash flow from 0.5% annually of invested assets to
0.375% annually; (2) the reduction by 50% of the General Partner's residual
interest in the Partnership comprised of (i) subordinated interest in
disposition proceeds and (ii) interest in distributions of sale or refinancing
proceeds; and (3) the reduction by 50% of the General Partner's interest in
profits and losses. Finally, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, PBP and PBSLP
forgave all deferred and unpaid fees due to them by the Partnership and the
Local Partnerships. The aggregate amount of such deferred and unpaid fees was
$1,034,498 as of September 30, 1997 and is reflected in the Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital as a capital contribution.
NOTE 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
a) Basis of Accounting and Principles of Consolidation
The books and records of the Partnership are maintained on the accrual basis of
accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires the General Partner to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
All subsidiaries have fiscal years ending December 31. Intercompany transactions
have been eliminated.
Minority interest in local partnerships represents the minority partners' share
of the net assets of the Local Partnerships.
Certain balances for prior years have been reclassified to conform with the
current year's financial statement presentation.
21
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
b) Investment in Property
The impairment of properties to be held and used is determined to exist when
estimated amounts recoverable through future operations on an undiscounted basis
are below the properties' carrying value. If a property is determined to be
impaired, it is recorded at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated
fair value.
The determination of estimated fair value is based not only upon future cash
flows, which rely upon estimates and assumptions including expense growth,
occupancy and rental rates, and tax credits, but also upon market capitalization
and discount rates as well as other market indicators. The General Partner
believes that the estimates and assumptions used are appropriate in evaluating
the carrying amount of the Partnership's properties. However, changes in market
conditions and circumstances may occur in the near term which would cause these
estimates and assumptions to change, which, in turn, could cause the amounts
ultimately realized upon the sale or other disposition of the properties to
differ materially from their estimated fair value. Such changes may also require
write-downs in future years.
The cost of buildings and improvements is depreciated using the straight-line
method over their estimated useful lives which range from 27.5 to 40 years.
c) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include money market funds whose cost approximates
market value.
d) Cash and Cash Equivalents Held in Escrow
Cash and cash equivalents held in escrow include restricted funds held for
payment of real estate taxes and insurance, tenant security deposits and
replacement reserves.
e) Taxes
The Partnership is not required to provide for, or pay, any Federal or state
income taxes. Income tax attributes that arise from its operations are passed
directly to the partners. The Partnership may be subject to other state and
local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates. For income tax purposes, the
Partnership's year ends on December 31.
f) Profits and Loss Allocations/Distributions
Net income or loss was allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the
General Partner through September 30, 1997. As of October 1, 1997 net income or
loss is allocated 99.5% to the limited partners and .5% to the General Partner.
Distributions of cash may be made in accordance with the Partnership Agreement
and, if made, are allocated, as of October 1, 1997, 99.5% to the limited
partners and .5% to the General Partner. As of March 31, 1998, no distributions
have been paid.
22
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
g) Operating Deficit Guarantees
Pursuant to certain operating deficit guaranty agreements, Local General
Partners are required to fund operating deficits, as defined in the Local
Partnership agreements incurred during the period commencing with the break-even
date, as defined in the Local Partnership agreements, and ending on the third
anniversary of the break-even date. These advances are non-interest bearing.
NOTE 3 - Costs, Fees and Expenses
a) Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include amounts paid for services rendered in arranging
the financing for the Local Partnerships. These costs were capitalized and are
being amortized over the lives of the related debt. The accumulated amortization
as of March 31, 1998 and 1997 is $2,369,511 and $2,094,056, respectively.
b) Management Fees
Each individual property has a managing agent who performs the necessary
functions in operating the property. The property management fee is equal to a
percentage of the annual gross revenues of a property paid in consideration of
the property management services provided (See Note 7).
The General Partner was entitled to receive a management fee, payable from
operations and reserves, in an amount not to exceed the difference between .5%
per annum of Invested Assets (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) and the
local administrative fee payable to PBSLP through September 30, 1997. As of
October 1, 1997 the limitation amount for the management fee was reduced from
.5% annually to 0.375% annually. This management fee is for administering the
affairs of the Partnership (See Note 6). Unpaid portions of the management fee
for any year accrue without interest.
c) General and Administrative
The Partnership reimburses the General Partner and its affiliates for actual
Partnership operating expenses payable by or allocable to the Partnership (See
Note 6). The Partnership also pays amounts directly to unrelated third parties
for certain operating expenses.
23
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
NOTE 4 - Investment in Property
The Partnership's Properties and related debt at March 31 were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net Investment in Property Mortgage Notes Payable
-------------------------- --------------------------
Description (a) 1998 1997 1998 1997
- - --------------- ------------ ----------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Apartment Complexes:
RMB Limited Partnership $ 3,658,892 $ 3,798,138 $ 1,917,047 $ 1,934,623
(Hubbard's Ridge)
Garland, TX
Cutler Canal II 9,268,201 9,550,804 5,949,245 5,982,895
Associates, Ltd.
Miami, FL
Diamond Street Venture 1,995,454 2,081,026 3,003,370 3,017,829
Philadelphia, PA
Papillion Heights 1,754,649 1,803,229 1,023,273 1,033,084
Apartments L.P.
Papillion, NE
Hill Top Homes 6,644,019 6,849,012 3,586,339 3,643,632
Apartments
Limited Partnership
Arlington, TX
Palm Beach 33,869,344 34,475,494 26,322,682 26,614,668
Apartments, Ltd.
(Summer Creek Villas)
West Palm Beach, FL
Brookland Park Plaza 4,723,572 4,951,808 2,476,057 2,499,200
Limited Partnership
Richmond, VA
Compton Townhouses 1,682,950 1,795,848 1,354,838 1,373,097
Limited Partnership ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Cincinnati, OH
$63,597,081 $65,305,359 $45,632,851 $46,099,028
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(a) The Partnership holds a 66.5% interest in Summer Creek Villas, a 98%
interest in Hubbard's Ridge, Hill Top Homes and Compton Townhouses and a 98.99%
interest in Cutler Canal II, Diamond Street, Papillion Heights and Brookland
Park Plaza.
(b) The investment in property relating to the Diamond Street Venture was
reduced by $2,700,000 as of March 31, 1995 representing a loss on impairment of
the asset.
24
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
NOTE 5 - Mortgage Notes Payable
Mortgage notes are collateralized (on a recourse basis) by land, buildings and
improvements and leases related thereto. Annual principal payment requirements
for each of the next five years ending December 31, the date at which the Local
Partnerships are consolidated, and thereafter are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount
----------
<S> <C>
1998 $ 507,689
1999 558,840
2000 615,122
2001 678,063
2002 746,239
Thereafter 42,526,898
----------
$45,632,851
</TABLE>
Mortgage notes consist of both first mortgages and support loans (second and
third mortgages). First mortgages amounting to $40,692,851 bear interest at
rates ranging from 0% to 10.5% and have final maturities ranging from December
1, 2006 to May 1, 2031. First mortgages include $26,750,000 in the form of a
guaranteed bond bearing interest at 10.451% (including a .125% service fee
payable to an affiliate of the Local General Partner) maturing on June 20, 2008.
The support loans include two loans totaling $2,440,000 maturing on May 1, 2016
and December 15, 2029, the latter of which bears interest at 1%, and the former
being non-interest bearing, and a $2,500,000 loan bearing interest at a maximum
rate of 9% and maturing on January 16, 2005. The $2,500,000 loan includes a base
interest rate of 3% and an additional interest rate of 6%. The base interest
rate is payable annually from Project Income, as defined in the loan agreement,
and can be deferred if Project Income is inadequate. The additional interest is
payable from Project Income, if available, and only after payment of a
cumulative annual 12% return on capital to the limited partners of the Local
Partnership. Currently, only the base interest rate is being paid; however, the
additional interest of 6% continues to be accrued in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
At March 31, 1998 and 1997, the estimated fair values of the mortgage notes
payable were approximately $48,473,000 and $51,700,000, respectively. These
estimates were based upon the present value of expected cash flows discounted at
rates currently available to the Local Partnerships for similar loans. Fair
value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market
information, and are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters
of significant judgment. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Local Partnerships would pay upon
maturity or disposition of the loans.
NOTE 6 - Related Parties
During their respective ownership periods, the General Partners and their
affiliates perform services for the Partnership which include, but are not
limited to: accounting and financial management, registrar, transfer and
assignment functions, asset management, investor communications, printing and
other administrative services. The General Partners and their affili-
25
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
ates receive management fees and reimbursements for general and administrative
costs incurred in connection with these services, the amount of which is limited
by the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. In order to assist in the
transition from PBP to the New GP as General Partner, the New GP has engaged PBP
to perform certain of the forgoing services and paid PBP from amounts which
would otherwise be payable to the New GP pursuant to the terms of the
Partnership Agreement. These services terminated March 31, 1998. The costs and
expenses incurred to the General Partner (prior to October 1, 1997 PBP and
thereafter the New GP) were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended March 31,
-----------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Management fees $279,711 $292,575 $260,865
Local administrative fees 20,250 51,979 15,250
General and administrative 75,723 83,514 88,541
-------- -------- --------
$375,684 $428,068 $364,656
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, PBP and PBSLP forgave all deferred and
unpaid fees due to them by the Partnership and the Local Partnerships (see Note
1 for further information). The aggregate amount of such deferred and unpaid
fees totaled $1,034,498 and is reflected in the Consolidated Statement of
Changes in Partners' Capital as a capital contribution. PBP forgave $799,618
related to management fees that had been deferred since January 1, 1995 and
$104,400 of general and administrative fees that had been deferred since April
1, 1996. PBSLP, an affiliate of PBP, acting as a special limited partner for
each of the Local Partnerships and entitled to up to $2,750 per year as a local
administrative fee, forgave $130,480 of such fees. Partnership fees owed to the
General Partner and the New SLP amounting to approximately $43,000 were accrued
and unpaid as of March 31 1998.
The Partnership is dependent upon the support of the General Partner and certain
of its affiliates in order to meet its obligations at the Partnership level. The
General Partner and these affiliates have agreed to continue such support for
the foreseeable future.
See Note 1 with respect to certain changes in the fees payable to the General
Partner after October 1, 1997.
In May 1997, the management company for Summer Creek Villas and Cutler Canal II,
an affiliate of the Local General Partner, was sold to a third party.
Accordingly, at March 31, 1998, the properties owned by four of the Local
Partnerships are managed by a Local General Partner or its affiliates.
The Partnership maintained an account with the Prudential Tax Free Money Fund,
an affiliate of PBP, for investment of its available cash in short-term
instruments through October 31, 1997.
Prudential Securities Incorporated, an affiliate of PBP, owns 56 BUC$ at March
31, 1998.
26
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
NOTE 7 - General Partners and Affiliates of Local Partnerships
Certain Local General Partners and their affiliates provided services in
connection with the construction, financing and development of the Apartment
Complexes. Interest is accrued on certain loans made by two of the Local General
Partners. Additionally, during the years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
six of the Local Partnerships were managed by a Local General Partner or its
affiliates. The costs were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended March 31,
-----------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest $ 69,280 $ 69,280 $ 69,280
Management fees 202,448 394,228 394,719
-------- -------- --------
$271,728 $463,508 $463,999
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
Due to general partners and affiliates of local partnerships includes amounts
payable for accrued interest, advances, property management fees and operating
loans made in accordance with operating deficit guaranty agreements. During the
years ended March 31, 1998 and 1997, Summer Creek Villas received from its Local
General Partner $1,089,460 and $778,000, respectively, of operating deficit
guaranty payments. The Local General Partner elected to treat $1,000,000 and
$678,000 of the amount received during the years ended March 31, 1998 and 1997
as non-repayable advances and recorded the amounts as other income during the
respective years. Additionally, during the year ended March 31, 1996, Summer
Creek Villas received from its Local General Partner a $100,000 working capital
advance which was repaid in January 1996. As of March 31, 1998, one property,
Papillion Heights, remains subject to an operating deficit guaranty.
At March 31, 1998 and 1997, construction costs of $605,358 were payable to an
affiliate of one of the Local General Partners.
At March 31, 1998 and 1997, development fees of $1,579,709 were payable to
various Local General Partners.
NOTE 8 - Commitments and Contingencies
Subsidiary Partnership - Going Concern
Summer Creek Villas Local Partnership
Summer Creek Villas Local Partnership has experienced declining occupancy levels
over the course of the last few years, which has resulted in recurring losses
from operations and has adversely affected the liquidity of Summer Creek Villas.
In addition to the decline in occupancy levels, the Summer Creek Villas'
operations are further impeded by the inability to raise rents sufficiently to
pay for the increase in operating costs. Summer Creek Villas has been unable to
obtain maximum rents due to the competitive market and the fact that the rents
in the surrounding area are at market rate, competitive to the project. This
problem is further compounded by the increased costs in marketing the property
to effectively compete in the sub market. Further, rent levels are restricted
based on countywide median income levels, which limit the maximum income that a
prospective resident can earn and the maximum rents
27
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1998
that the project is allowed to charge. Summer Creek Villas has been further
obligated, beginning in 1996, to repay significant amounts of principal on its
mortgage.
During 1997, in an effort to improve occupancy, the Summer Creek Villas invested
approximately $423,000 to improve the physical condition of the property. Such
improvements primarily consisted of painting and pressure cleaning of roofs,
splitting the property in two phases with separate club houses and leasing
offices, landscaping and individual unit upgrades.
Through a portion of 1997, the Local General Partner has been obligated to fund
operating deficits under two separate operating deficit guaranty agreements.
Total advances made by the Local General Partner under the operating deficit
guarantees totaled $2,742,460. In addition, the Local General Partner has made
voluntary loans in excess of its obligations under the guarantees to fund
operations of $668,589. As of March 31, 1998, the Local General Partner is no
longer required to fund operations of Summer Creek Villas.
The Local General Partner plans to attempt a restructuring of Summer Creek
Villas' debt, and is also exploring the possibility of raising additional
capital. However, as of March 31, 1998, no definitive agreements have been
reached regarding these plans.
As of March 31, 1998, the consolidated financial statements include total assets
of $36,986,624, total liabilities of $29,291,620 and a minority interest of
$2,675,515 attributable to this subsidiary.
Summer Creek Villas' ability to continue its operations is dependent upon
management achieving the plans described in the foregoing paragraphs. The
accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Any adjustments would be
limited solely to this subsidiary's financial statements included herein.
28
<PAGE>
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
None
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
There are no directors or executive officers of the Registrant. The Registrant
is managed by the General Partner.
The Registrant, the Registrant's General Partner and its directors and executive
officers, and any persons holding more than ten percent of the Registrant's BUC$
are required to report their initial ownership of such BUC$ and any subsequent
changes in that ownership to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms 3,
4 and 5. Such executive officers, directors, and persons who own greater than
ten percent of the Registrant's BUC$ are required by Securities and Exchange
Commission regulations to furnish the Registrant with copies of all Forms 3, 4
and 5 they file. All of these filling requirements were satisfied on a timely
basis. In making these disclosures, the Registrant has relied solely on written
representations of the General Partner, if any, or copies of the reports they
have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission during and with respect
to its most recent fiscal year.
The members and executive officers of the General Partner and their positions
with regard to managing the Registrant are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Position
- - ---- --------
<S> <C>
J. Michael Fried Member, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Stuart J. Boesky Member, Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
Alan P. Hirmes Member, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Bruce H. Brown Senior Vice President
Denise L. Kiley Vice President
Mark J. Schlacter Vice President
Marc D. Schnitzer Vice President
Glenn F. Hopps Treasurer
Lynn A. McMahon Secretary
</TABLE>
J. MICHAEL FRIED, 54, is the sole stockholder of one of the general partners of
Related, the real estate finance affiliate of The Related Companies, L.P. In
that capacity, he is generally responsible for all of the syndication, finance,
acquisition and investor reporting activities of Related and its affiliates. Mr.
Fried practiced corporate law in New York City with the law
29
<PAGE>
firm of Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn from 1974 until he joined Related in
1979. Mr. Fried graduated from Brooklyn Law School with a Juris Doctor degree,
magna cum laude; from Long Island University Graduate School with a Master of
Science degree in Psychology; and from Michigan State University with a Bachelor
of Arts degree in History.
STUART J. BOESKY, 42, is the sole stockholder of one of the general partners of
Related, the real estate finance affiliate of The Related Companies, L.P. Mr.
Boesky practiced real estate and tax law in New York City with the law firm of
Shipley & Rothstein from 1984 until February 1986 when he joined Related. From
1983 to 1984 Mr. Boesky practiced law with the Boston law firm of Kaye, Fialkow,
Richmond & Rothstein (which subsequently merged with Strook & Strook & Lavan)
and from 1978 to 1980 was a consultant specializing in real estate at the
accounting firm of Laventhol & Horwath. Mr. Boesky graduated from Michigan State
University with a Bachelor of Arts degree and from Wayne State School of Law
with a Juris Doctor degree. He then received a Master of Laws degree in Taxation
from Boston University School of Law.
ALAN P. HIRMES, 43, is the sole stockholder of one of the general partners of
Related, the real estate finance affiliate of The Related Companies, L.P. Mr.
Hirmes has been a Certified Public Accountant in New York since 1978. Prior to
joining Related in October 1983, Mr. Hirmes was employed by Wiener & Co.,
certified public accountants. Mr. Hirmes graduated from Hofstra University with
a Bachelor of Arts degree.
BRUCE H. BROWN, 44, is a Senior Vice President of Related and is Director of the
Portfolio Management Group. He is responsible for overseeing the administration
of the firm's public debt and equity partnerships encompassing the monitoring of
the performance of each partnership and each investment. He is also responsible
for Related's loan servicing activities with respect to the firm's $600 million
participating and insured and co-insured mortgage portfolio. Prior to joining
Related in 1987, Mr. Brown was a real estate lending officer at U.S. Trust
Company of New York and previously held management positions in the hotel and
resort industry with Helmsley-Spear and Westin Hotels. Mr. Brown graduated from
Colgate University with a Bachelor of Arts degree.
DENISE L. KILEY, 38, is an Executive Vice President and Chief Underwriter for
Related, responsible for overseeing the investment underwriting and approval of
all multifamily residential properties invested in Related sponsored corporate,
public and private equity and debt funds. Ms. Kiley is also responsible for the
strategic planning and implementation of the firm's mortgage financing programs.
Prior to joining Related in 1990, Ms. Kiley had experience acquiring, financing,
and managing the assets of multifamily residential properties. From 1981 through
1985 she was an auditor with a national accounting firm. Ms. Kiley holds a
Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Boston College and is a Member of
the Affordable Housing Roundtable.
MARK J. SCHLACTER, 47, is a Vice President of Mortgage Acquisitions of Related,
and has been with Related since June 1989. Mr. Schlacter is responsible for the
origination of Related's taxable participating debt programs and low-income
housing tax credit debt programs. Prior to joining Related, Mr. Schlacter
garnered 16 years of direct real estate experience covering commercial and
residential construction, single and multifamily mortgage origination and
servicing, commercial mortgage origination and servicing, multifamily property
acquisition and financing, and multifamily mortgage lending program underwriting
and development. He was a Vice President with Bankers Trust Company from 1986 to
June 1989, and held prior positions with Citibank, Anchor Savings Bank and the
Pyramid Companies covering the 1972-1986 period. Mr. Schlacter holds a Bachelor
of Arts degree in Political Science from Pennsyl-
30
<PAGE>
vania State University and periodically teaches multifamily underwriting at the
New York University School of Continuing Education, Real Estate Institute.
MARK D. SCHNITZER, 37, is an Executive Vice President of Related and Director of
the firm's Tax Credit Acquisitions Group. Mr. Schnitzer received a Master of
Business Administration degree from The Wharton School of the University of
Pennsylvania in December 1987, and joined Related in January 1988. From 1983 to
1986, Mr. Schnitzer was a Financial Analyst in the Fixed Income Research
department of The First Boston Corporation in New York. Mr. Schnitzer received a
Bachelor of Science degree, summa cum laude, in Business Administration from the
School of Management at Boston University.
GLENN F. HOPPS, 35, joined Related in December, 1990, and prior to that date was
employed by Marks Shron & Company and Weissbarth, Altman and Michaelson,
certified public accountants. Mr. Hopps graduated from New York State University
at Albany with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting.
LYNN A. McMAHON, 42, has served since 1983 as assistant to J. Michael Fried.
From 1978 to 1983, she was employed at Sony Corporation of America in the
Government Relations Department.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The Registrant does not pay or accrue any fees, salaries or any other form of
compensation to directors and officers of the General Partner for its services.
Certain executive officers and directors of the General Partner receive
compensation from affiliates of the General Partner, not from the Registrant,
for services performed for various affiliated entities, which may include
services performed for the Registrant; however, the General Partner believes
that any compensation attributable to services performed for the Registrant is
immaterial. See Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions for
information regarding compensation to the General Partner.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
As of June 1, 1998, Messrs. Fried, Boesky, Hirmes and Ross own directly or
beneficially 100% of the interest in the voting securities of the General
Partner.
As of June 1, 1998, no director or executive officer of the General Partner owns
directly or beneficially any of the BUC$ issued by the Registrant.
As of June 1, 1998, no limited partner beneficially owns more than five percent
(5%) of the BUC$ issued by the Registrant.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The Registrant has and will continue to have certain relationships with the
General Partner and its affiliates. However, there have been no direct financial
transactions between the Registrant and the directors or executive officers of
the General Partner.
Reference is made to Notes 1, 3, 6 and 7, to the consolidated financial
statements in the Registrant's financial statements, which identify the related
parties and discuss the services provided by these parties and the amounts paid
or payable for their services.
31
<PAGE>
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
Sequential
Page
----------
(a) 1. Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report 15
Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition as of March 31, 1998 and 1997 32
Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996 33
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Partners' Capital for the years ended March
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 34
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
the years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996 35
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 36
(a) 2. Financial Statement Schedules and
Independent Auditors' Report on Schedules
Independent Auditors' Report on Schedules 52
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated
Depreciation 53
All other schedules have been omitted
because they are not required or because the
required information is contained in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
32
<PAGE>
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(continued)
Sequential
Page
----------
(a) 3. Exhibits
The Partnership's Agreement of Limited
Partnership as adopted on May 3, 1989 and
Amendments thereto dated May 25, 1989 and
June 21, 1989*
Amendment Number 1 to Prudential-Bache Tax
Credit Properties L.P. Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated
October 1, 1997***
Form of Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership (included in Prospectus
as Exhibit A)**
Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed
on May 3, 1989 and Amendments thereto dated
May 25, 1989 and June 21, 1989*
Amendment to Certificate of Limited
Partnership dated October 1, 1997***
Form of Purchase and Sale Agreement
pertaining to the Partnership's acquisition
of Local Partnership Interests**
Form of Amended and Restated Agreement of
Local Limited Partnership of Local
Partnerships**
Financial Statement Schedule (filed herewith) 55
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter.
*Filed as an exhibit to Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-11 Registration
Statement (No. 33-28571) and incorporated
herein by reference.
**Filed as an exhibit to Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 2 to Form S-11 Registration
Statement (No. 33-28571) and incorporated
herein by reference.
***Filed as an exhibit to Registrant's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated
October 1, 1997 and incorporated herein
by reference.
33
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(Registrant)
By: RCC PARTNERS 96, L.L.C.,
General Partner
Date: June 22, 1998 By: /s/ J. Michael Fried
--------------------
J. Michael Fried
Member, President and
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Member, President and
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ J. Michael Fried (principal executive officer)
- - -------------------- RCC Partners 96., L.L.C. June 22, 1998
J. Michael Fried
Member, Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
/s/ Stuart J. Boesky (principal operating officer) of
- - -------------------- RCC Partners 96., L.L.C. June 22, 1998
Stuart J. Boesky
Member, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
/s/ Alan P. Hirmes (principal financial officer) of
- - ------------------ RCC Partners 96., L.L.C. June 22, 1998
Alan P. Hirmes
Treasurer
/s/ Glenn F. Hopps (principal accounting officer) of
- - ------------------ RCC Partners 96., L.L.C. June 22, 1998
Glenn F. Hopps
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners of
Patriot Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(formerly known as Prudential-Bache Tax Credit Properties L.P.)
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Patriot
Tax Credit Properties L.P. and Subsidiaries included in this Form 10-K, we have
also audited supporting Schedule III for the year ended March 31, 1998. In our
opinion, based on our audit and the reports of the other auditors, the
consolidated schedule presents fairly, when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements, the financial data required to be set forth
therein.
/s/ ANCHIN, BLOCK & ANCHIN LLP
ANCHIN, BLOCK & ANCHIN LLP
New York, New York
May 14, 1998
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
MARCH 31, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Initial Cost to Partnership Costs Capitalized
--------------------------- Subsequent to Acquisition (7)
Buildings and -------------------------------
Description (4) (6) Encumbrances Land Improvements Improvements Carrying Costs
- - ------------------- ------------ ----------- ------------ -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Apartment Complexes:
RMB Limited Partnership
(Hubbard's Ridge) (1)
Garland, TX $ 1,917,047 $ 107,237 $ 965,136 $ 3,757,584 $ 185,180
Cutler Canal II
Associates, Ltd. (2)
Miami, FL 5,949,245 807,071 1,388,350 8,861,278 67,728
Diamond Street Venture (3)
Philadelphia, PA 3,003,370 9,729 234,465 2,352,712 273,218
Papillion Heights
Apartments L.P. (1)
Papillion, NE 1,023,273 63,329 1,816,598 259,995 66,552
Hill Top Homes
Apartments L.P. (1)
Arlington, TX 3,586,339 553,841 3,690,150 3,542,729 316,368
Palm Beach Apartments Ltd, (1)
(Summer Creek Villas)
West Palm Beach, FL 26,322,682 2,396,876 10,578,563 25,980,637 1,876,795
Brookland Park Plaza L.P. (1)
Richmond, VA 2,476,057 50,000 109,850 5,913,617 376,165
Compton Townhouses L.P. (1)
Cincinnati, OH 1,354,838 17,550 476,708 1,923,171 28,203
--------- -------- --------- -------- --------
$45,632,851 $4,005,633 $19,259,820 $52,591,723 $3,190,209
========== ========= ========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Gross Amounts Life on which
at which Carried At Close of Period (5) Depreciation in
--------------------------------------- Date Latest Income
Buildings and Accumulated Construction Date Statements are
Description (4) (6) Land Improvements Total Depreciation Completed Acquired Computed
- - ------------------- --------- ------------ --------- ----------- ----------- --------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Apartment Complexes:
RMB Limited Partnership
(Hubbard's Ridge) (1)
Garland, TX $ 107,237 $ 4,907,900 $ 5,015,137 $ 1,356,245 5/90 12/89 30
Cutler Canal II
Associates, Ltd. (2)
Miami, FL 807,071 10,317,356 11,124,427 1,856,226 1/91 1/90 40
Diamond Street Venture (3)
Philadelphia, PA 9,729 2,860,395 2,870,124 874,670 12/90 1/90 40
Papillion Heights
Apartments L.P. (1)
Papillion, NE 63,329 2,143,095 2,206,424 451,775 12/90 4/90 27.5
Hill Top Homes
Apartments L.P. (1)
Arlington, TX 553,841 7,549,247 8,103,088 1,459,069 12/90 6/90 30
Palm Beach Apartments Ltd, (1)
(Summer Creek Villas)
West Palm Beach, FL 2,396,876 38,435,995 40,832,871 6,963,527 8/91 6/90 40
Brookland Park Plaza L.P. (1)
Richmond, VA 50,000 6,399,682 6,449,682 1,726,110 12/90 7/90 27.5
Compton Townhouses L.P. (1)
Cincinnati, OH 17,550 2,428,082 2,445,632 762,682 6/92 1/92 40
-------- --------- --------- ---------
$4,005,633 $75,041,752 $79,047,385 $15,450,304
========= ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) First mortgage
(2) Includes first and second mortgages
(3) Includes first, second and third mortgages
(4) At March 31, 1998, the Registrant holds a 66.5% interest in the Local
Partnerships of Summer Creek Villas, a 98% interest in Hubbard's Ridge,
Hill Top Homes and Compton Townhouses and a 98.99% interest in Cutler
Canal II, Diamond Street, Papillion Heights and Brookland Park Plaza.
(5) The cost basis of Land and Buildings and Improvements for federal income
tax purposes as of December 31, 1997 is $79,949,367.
(6) The Registrant believes the properties are adequately insured.
(7) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition included a write-down of
$2,700,000 for Diamond Street Venture recorded as of March 31, 1995.
<PAGE>
PATRIOT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES L.P.
(a limited partnership)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
MARCH 31, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost of Property and Equipment Accumulated Depreciation
---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
Year Ended March 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note A - Reconciliation 1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996
- - ----------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year $78,589,191 $78,589,191 $78,589,191 $13,283,832 $11,073,281 $ 8,863,867
Additions during year:
Improvements 458,194 0 0
Depreciation expense (1) 2,166,472 2,210,551 2,209,414
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Balance at close of year $79,047,385 $78,589,191 $78,589,191 $15,450,304 $13,283,832 $11,073,281
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) Refer to Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary
financial information extracted from
the financial statements for Patriot
Tax Credit Properties L.P. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000850184
<NAME> Patriot Tax Credit Properties L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> MAR-31-1998
<CASH> 2,123,906
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 0
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 253,554
<PP&E> 79,047,385
<DEPRECIATION> 15,450,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 68,835,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 8,206,575
<BONDS> 45,632,851
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 12,124,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 68,835,813
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 9,569,072
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 8,308,012
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 4,362,919
<INCOME-PRETAX> (2,672,898)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 0
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (2,672,898)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (69.55)
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
