UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1998 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-26968
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
NEVADA 94-3094580
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
26460 CORPORATE AVENUE, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA 94545
(Address and Zip Code of Principal Executive Offices)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (510)783-9210
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: COMMON STOCK,
$0.01 PAR VALUE
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [_]
The aggregate market value of the Registrant's Common Stock held by
nonaffiliates on October 19, 1998 (based upon the average of the high and low
sales prices of such stock as of such date) was approximately $378,260,000.
For purposes of this disclosure, Common Stock held by persons who hold
more than 5% of the outstanding voting shares and Common Stock held by
executive officers and directors of the Registrant have been excluded in that
such persons may be deemed to be "affiliates" as that term is defined under
the rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of
1933. This determination is not necessarily conclusive.
As of October 19, 1998, 21,154,294 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock
were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on December 8, 1998 (the "Proxy Statement") is
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent stated
herein.
<PAGE>
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1998
PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Executive Officers of the Registrant
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
MEBES(R), CORE(R), Etec(R), the Etec logo, Polyscan(TM), and ALTA(R) are
trademarks of the Company. This Annual Report also includes trademarks and
trade names of other companies.
<PAGE>
PART I
Item 1. Business
This item contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. The Company's actual results may differ significantly from the
results discussed in the forward-looking statements. In addition to other risks
and uncertainties described in this document, certain risks and uncertainties
that could affect the Company's financial results include the following:
potential delays in shipments; cyclicity of the maskmaking and semiconductor
equipment industries; the capital spending decisions of customers and potential
customers; the development, market acceptance and successful production of new
products and enhancements; competitors' product introductions and enhancements;
risks associated with acquisitions, including the Company's ability to
successfully integrate acquired businesses, products, or technologies; risks
associated with stock market volatility; risks associated with a reduction in
cooperative development funding; and risks associated with foreign operations,
such as foreign exchange risk, import-export controls, and political risks.
See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations ("MD&A") - Other Factors Affecting Company Results.
Etec Systems, Inc. ("Etec" or the "Company") is a world leader in the
production of photomask pattern generation equipment for the semiconductor
industry. Etec designs, develops, manufactures and markets equipment that
produces high precision photomasks ("masks"), which are used to print circuit
patterns onto semiconductor wafers.
Etec was incorporated in 1989 under the laws of Nevada to effect a leveraged
buyout in 1990 of the former Electron Beam Technology Division of The
Perkin-Elmer Corporation, which was itself the continuation of a business
commenced in 1970.
Products and Services
Etec's products consist of electron beam and laser beam lithography systems.
The Company sells its maskmaking products as part of its Semiconductor Products
Group ("SPG"), and has established its Interconnect Products Group ("IPG") to
begin selling its direct imaging systems to printed circuit board ("PCB")
manufacturers. The Company's systems are designed to provide a low cost of
production through high performance, reliability, and ease of maintenance. In
addition, many of the Company's systems have modular designs to facilitate
retrofitting. The Company is the only maskmaking equipment manufacturer
currently offering both electron beam and laser beam systems. The Company
believes that this represents an important competitive advantage, as the
different performance and cost characteristics of electron beam and laser beam
systems permit it to cover a broad range of technical requirements and cost
sensitivities for its SPG customers. Etec sells its MEBES(R) electro beam
systems and its ALTA(R) laser beam systems at prices currently ranging from
approximately $6.0 million to approximately $13.0 million each, and accessories
and upgrades at prices currently ranging from approximately $1.0 million to
approximately $9.0 million each. The Company also derives significant revenues
from service and support of its installed base of systems. The Company believes
that approximately 315 commercial electron beam and laser beam mask pattern
generation systems are currently installed worldwide, of which approximately
215 have been produced by Etec.
The different characteristics of electron beam and laser beam systems address
different segments of the mask pattern generation market. Electron beam systems
have a much smaller beam spot size than laser beam systems and are best suited
for leading- edge market segments that require the highest resolution and
accuracy. The Company's MEBES electron beam systems also have an open control
and software architecture, which offers maximum flexibility to the maskmaker.
The primary advantage of laser beam systems is their relative simplicity and
lower cost of ownership compared to electron beam systems. Another advantage of
laser beam systems is the use of optical resists for the maskmaking process,
which are easier to use than electron beam resists. The Company also
manufactures and sells the DigiRiteT 2000 laser direct imaging system through
its IPG. The DigiRite 2000 system allows a PCB manufacturer to transfer
computer generated patterns directly to printed circuit boards, eliminating the
intermediate steps associated with printing patterns on masks. This allows the
manufacturer to print more complex patterns, eliminate set-up time, and reduce
cost for low volume, high complexity advanced PCB products. The Company is in
the initial stages of establishing its IPG product in the PCB industry. There
can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in this effort. In
fiscal 1998 revenue from the IPG was immaterial. Please see the discussion in
MD&A - Other Factors Affecting Company Results - Successful Integration of
Acquired Businesses.
The Company's future success depends upon the market's acceptance of new
generations of its systems, as follows:
o The Company commenced shipment of its MEBES 4500S in April 1997 and its ALTA
3500 system in October 1997. The MEBES 4500S is a 0.18-micron development
pattern generation ("PG") tool that offers significant performance
improvements over its predecessor, the MEBES 4500 such as higher throughput
and improved printing quality. The ALTA 3500 system is the next generation
of scanned-laser systems to produce masks for production of 0.25-micron
devices.
o In June 1998 the Company shipped the first MEBES 5000 beta system, which
allows pilot production of complex masks for 0.18 micron devices. The
throughput of the MEBES 5000 is as much as eight times faster than the MEBES
4500.
o In March 1998, the Company announced the shipment of the first Digirite(TM)
2000 production laser direct imaging system for the PCB industry. This
system eliminates 80% of the steps previously used in primary imaging.
The Company also sells a variety of hardware and software packages, which are
designed to enhance the performance of previously installed systems. For
example, the Company markets retrofit "suites" that upgrade MEBES III and IV
systems to higher performance systems, such as MEBES 4000, MEBES 4500, or
MEBES 4500S systems. In addition, the Company sells accessories to enhance the
performance of the MEBES 4500 system itself, such as MPG software to
significantly reduce mask writing time, a robotic loading module to automate
mask loading, and a two- cassette load chamber to permit faster evacuation of
the finished mask from the load chamber. From time to time, the Company also
repurchases, refurbishes, and resells a limited number of systems.
The Company's warranty obligations for its SPG systems generally cover a
12-month period beginning upon final customer acceptance. However, most
customers have requested service and support beyond the warranty period, and
Etec has historically derived significant revenues from annual service and
maintenance for its installed base of systems. Approximately 150 of the
Company's systems are currently serviced under one-year contracts with Etec.
Most customers request a package of service and support that includes a
variety of spare parts and support from an on-site Etec field engineer.
Service revenues were approximately $37.2 million, $34.4 million, and $32.7
million, in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Customers
The Company's SPG customers include both captive and commercial (or
"merchant") mask shops. Semiconductor manufacturers employ their captive
capabilities largely to supply portions of their own requirements for masks,
while merchant mask shops sell masks to a variety of semiconductor device
manufacturers. Repeat sales to existing customers represent a significant
portion of the Company's product revenues, and the Company believes that its
installed base of approximately 215 systems represents a significant
competitive advantage.
Historically, the Company has sold a significant proportion of its systems to
a limited number of customers. In fiscal 1998, sales to one customer, Dai
Nippon Printing Company Limited, accounted for approximately 17% of total
revenues. Financial information about customer concentration is set forth in
Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements titled "Geographic Reporting
and Customer Concentration" in Part II, Item 8. The Company expects that sales
to relatively few customers will continue to account for a high percentage of
the Company's revenues in any accounting period in the foreseeable future. A
reduction in orders from any one customer or the cancellation or delay of any
significant order could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Sales and Marketing
Etec markets and distributes its products directly into its primary geographic
markets, which consist of North America, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and
Europe. The Company maintains sales offices in California, Japan, France,
Germany, South Korea and Taiwan. The Company also uses sales representatives
for certain products in Taiwan and Europe. The Company's agreements with its
sales representatives are terminable upon 90 days' notice by either party.
Because of the significant investment required to purchase Etec's systems and
their highly technical nature, the sales cycle is complex, requiring
interaction with several levels of the customer's organization and extensive
technical exchanges, product demonstrations and commercial negotiations. As a
result, the sales cycle can be as long as 12 to 18 months. Installing and
integrating maskmaking equipment requires a substantial investment by a
customer. Purchase decisions are generally made at a high level within the
customer's organization, and the sales process involves broad participation
across the Etec organization, from the Chief Executive Officer to the
engineers who designed the product.
Backlog
The Company's backlog for products was approximately $128.8 million, $158.6
million, and $147.6 million, at July 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.
Etec defines backlog to include only those systems, accessories and upgrades
with respect to which a written purchase order or agreement has been received
and a delivery schedule has been specified for product shipment within the
next 12 months. Backlog is not necessarily representative of actual future
sales in any given period, because customers have historically been able to
reschedule shipments.
Product Development
Etec invests heavily in research and development for all of its products.
Research and development expenses, net of funding under cooperative
development agreements, were $53.4 million, $34.4 million, and $17.4 million,
in fiscal 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively, representing 19%, 14%, and 12%
of revenues, respectively.
Historically, governmental and private sources have funded a significant
portion of Etec's product development efforts. Governmental and quasi
governmental agencies such as the Department of Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA) and SEMATECH have supported Etec as a primary supplier
of pattern-generation technologies to the U.S. semiconductor industry,
although such funding declined significantly from fiscal 1994 to fiscal 1997,
due to the completion of major development projects. For the years ended July
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, $5.6 million, $2.0 million and $0.7 million,
respectively, of funds received under cooperative development agreements were
applied against research, development and engineering expenses. Included in
the $5.6 million during fiscal 1998 was $3.8 million of funding that was
recognized following completion of the second to sixth milestones under a
research and development agreement with SEMATECH. Excluding these cost
reimbursements and other credits, gross research, development and engineering
spending was $59.5 million, $36.4 million and $18.1 million in the years ended
July 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The increase reflects the
Company's continued commitment to higher levels of product development effort.
Manufacturing
Although the Company manufactures some of the components and subassemblies
used in its systems, many are purchased from unaffiliated subcontractors,
typically to the Company's specifications. None of the Company's suppliers is
obligated to provide the Company with any specific quantity of components or
subassemblies over any specific period. Most of the components and
subassemblies included in the Company's products are obtained from a single
supplier or a limited group of suppliers. In particular, the Company relies on
sole-source suppliers for its MEBES systems' electron beam sources,
high-voltage power supplies, certain lasers, lenses, and other critical
components, each of which is required for the production of the Company's
systems. To date, the Company has generally been able to obtain adequate,
timely delivery of critical subassemblies and components, although it has
experienced occasional delays. However, the manufacture of certain components
and subassemblies is very complex and requires long lead times. Any inability
to obtain adequate, timely deliveries of subassemblies and components could
prevent the Company from meeting scheduled shipment dates, which could damage
relationships with current and prospective customers and, as a result,
materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Competition
The maskmaking equipment industry is highly competitive. The Company believes
that the principal competitive factors in this industry are product
performance, service, technical support, system price, speed, reliability,
ease of upgrade, and the customer's cost of production as a result of these
and other factors. The Company believes that it presently competes favorably
with respect to each of these factors. Management also believes that the size
of Etec's installed base and the compatibility of its various products provide
a significant competitive advantage due to customers' desire for compatible
mask layers and common data formats. However, the Company believes that, to
remain competitive, it will require significant investment of financial
resources in new product development, in expansion and upgrading of its
manufacturing capacity, and in maintaining customer service and support
centers worldwide.
The Company currently experiences competition worldwide from a number of U.S.
and foreign manufacturers, including Hitachi, Ltd., JEOL, Ltd. ("Japan
Electron Optical Laboratory") and Leica, some of whom have substantially
greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, and customer service and support
capabilities. There can be no assurance that competitive pressures will not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition,
or results of operations.
Patents and Other Proprietary Rights
Etec holds over 60 United States patents expiring on various dates from 2001
through 2016, with corresponding patents and patent applications claiming
prior right from U.S. patent applications for most such patents in Japan,
South Korea, the European Community, and Canada. In the field of electron beam
lithography, Etec owns patents directed to electron guns, precision stages,
particle beam systems, deflection assemblies, calibration and measurement
processes, and addressing and writing schemes. In the field of laser beam
lithography, Etec owns patents directed to scanning optics, laser pattern
generation, and rasterization schemes. Etec also has a number of pending U.S.
and foreign patent applications. There can be no assurance that any of these
applications will be allowed or that any of the allowed applications will be
issued as patents.
Etec has five registered U.S. trademarks. In addition to patent and trademark
protection, the Company relies on the laws of unfair competition, copyright,
and trade secrets to protect its proprietary rights. The Company has entered
into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with its employees
and consultants that are designed to limit access to, and disclosure or use
of, the Company's proprietary information.
Semiconductor-related industries have experienced substantial litigation
regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. As is typical in the
industry, the Company has from time to time received, and may in the future
receive, communications from third parties alleging infringements of patents
and other intellectual property rights. In the future, protracted litigation
may be necessary to defend the Company against alleged infringement of others'
rights. Any such litigation, even if the Company is ultimately successful in
its defense, could result in substantial cost and diversion of time and
effort by management, which by itself could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Further, adverse determinations in such litigation could result in the
Company's loss of proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant
liabilities (including treble damages under certain circumstances), require
the Company to seek licenses from third parties, or prevent the Company from
manufacturing or selling its systems, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Governmental Regulations and Industry Standards
The Company is subject to a variety of governmental regulations relating to
the use, storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, manufacture, and
disposal of toxic or other hazardous substances. In addition, in Europe the
Company is subject to certain packaging and take- back packaging requirements.
The Company believes that it is currently in compliance in all material
respects with such regulations and that it has obtained or is in the process
of obtaining all material environmental permits necessary to conduct its
business. Nevertheless, the failure to comply with current or future
regulations could result in substantial fines being imposed on the Company,
suspension of production, alteration of its manufacturing process or cessation
of operations. Such regulations could require the Company to acquire expensive
remediation or abatement equipment, or to incur substantial expenses to comply
with environmental regulations. Any failure by the Company to control the use,
disposal, or storage of, or adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous or
toxic substances could subject the Company to significant liabilities.
The Company's products and worldwide operations are also subject to numerous
governmental regulations designed to protect the health and safety of
operators of manufacturing equipment. In particular, recent European Union
("EU") regulations relating to electromagnetic fields, electrical power, and
human exposure to laser radiation require Conformite Europeenne ("CE") mark
certification for shipments of electronic products to Europe. This includes CE
marking of shipments of products into the 15 European Union countries. All of
the Company's SPG products are currently eligible for the CE mark. The Company
has completed NRTL (National Recognized Testing Laboratory) certification for
Product Safety on its ALTA 3000/3500 product lines. All SPG products currently
comply with the SEMI (Semiconductor Equipment Manufacturers International) S2
and S8 Guidelines for Ergonomic and Product Safety Standards. In addition,
numerous domestic semiconductor manufacturers and independent mask shops,
including certain of the Company's customers, have subscribed to voluntary
health and safety standards and decline to purchase equipment not meeting such
standards.
The Company believes that its SPG products currently comply with all material
governmental health and safety regulations and with the voluntary industry
standards currently in effect. The Company is currently qualifying its IPG
product, the DigiRite 2000, for the CE mark and NRTL certification, both of
which it expects to complete in calendar 1998. In part because the scope of
future regulations and standards cannot be predicted, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to comply with any future regulations
or industry standards. Noncompliance could result in governmental restrictions
on sales or reductions in customer acceptance of the Company's products.
Compliance may also require significant product modifications, potentially
resulting in increased costs and impaired product performance.
Certain of the Company's products may not be sold outside of the United States
except pursuant to an export license from the United States Department of
Commerce. While the Company has not experienced significant delays in
obtaining such licenses for major markets, there can be no assurance that
future sales will not be subject to delay due to export license or other
regulatory requirements.
Employees
As of September 25, 1998, Etec had 1,119 full- time employees. None of the
U.S. employees are governed by a collective bargaining agreement. The
Company's financial performance will depend significantly upon the continued
contributions of its officers and key management, technical, sales and support
personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting or retaining
qualified personnel.
Financial information about industry segments
Financial information about industry segments is set forth in Note 10 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements titled "Geographic Reporting and Customer
Concentration" in Part II, Item 8, which information is incorporated by
reference into this Part I, Item 1.
Financial information about foreign and domestic operations and export sales
Financial information regarding geographic operations is set forth in Note 10
to the Consolidated Financial Statements titled "Geographic Reporting and
Customer Concentration" in Part II, Item 8, which information is incorporated
by reference into this Part I, Item 1. Discussion concerning risks attendant
to foreign operations is set forth in the MD&A - Other Factors Affecting
Company Results in Part II, Item 7, which information is incorporated by
reference into this Part I, Item 1.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company currently leases the major facilities described below:
Approximate
Square
Location Footage Use
- --------------------- ---------- --------------------------------------------
Hayward, California.. 210,000 Design, development and manufacture of
electron beam systems; corporate offices.
Beaverton, Oregon.... 70,000 Design, development and manufacture of laser
systems.
Tucson, Arizona...... 44,000 Design and development of ultraviolet laser
direct imaging systems.
Munich, Germany...... 16,000 Office, warehouse and manufacturing space for
Etec EBT (development of electron beam test
systems) and offices for sales and service
operations in Germany.
The Company also leases sales and service offices in France, Japan, South
Korea, and Taiwan.
The Company has completed the purchase of approximately 15.2 acres of land in
Hillsboro, Oregon and is having a new facility constructed to meet development
and manufacturing requirements for its advanced laser mask pattern generation
products. The new 176,800 square foot building is scheduled to be in use in
the spring of 1999 and is intended to replace the facility in Beaverton,
Oregon.
The Company is also having a new 130,000 square foot building constructed at
its Hayward site to modernize and expand its production, research, and
manufacturing facilities. This is the fourth building on the 21-acre Hayward
campus, and is scheduled to be in use in the spring of 1999.
During fiscal year 1998, the Company productively utilized the space in its
facilities. The Company believes its existing and planned facilities provide
adequate capacity to meet its projected business activities.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company is not currently involved in any material legal proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 1998.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table lists the names, ages and positions held with the Company
of all executive officers of the Company. There are no family relationships
between any director or executive officer and any other director or executive
officer of the Company.
The executive officers of the Company, who are elected by and serve at the
discretion of the Board of Directors are as follows:
Name Age Position
- ---------------------- ---- -----------------------------------------------
Stephen E. Cooper..... 52 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer
Paul A. Warkentin..... 45 Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
William D. Snyder..... 54 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
William D. Cole....... 43 Vice President, Worldwide Sales
Trisha A. Dohren...... 52 Vice President, Corporate Services
Mark A. Gesley........ 43 Vice President, Technology Development
James L. Herd......... 46 Vice President, Business Development
W. Russell Wayman..... 54 Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Mr. Cooper joined Etec as President and Chief Operating Officer in January
1993 and was named Chief Executive Officer in July 1993. He was initially
appointed to the Board of Directors in March 1993 and became Chairman of the
Board in April 1995. He is also a director of Vivid Semiconductor.
Dr. Warkentin was appointed Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, in
September 1997. From July 1995 to August 1997, Dr. Warkentin was Vice
President, Marketing. From 1993 to 1995, Dr. Warkentin was Beaverton site
manager.
Mr. Snyder was appointed Vice President, Chief Financial Officer when he
joined Etec in August 1997. From 1990 to 1997, Mr. Snyder was Chief Financial
Officer of Integrated Device Technology, a semiconductor manufacturing
company.
Mr. Cole, Vice President, Worldwide Sales, joined Etec as Vice President,
Sales and Customer Support in August 1996. Before coming to Etec, Mr. Cole
served as Vice President, Sales for Genus, Inc., a manufacturer of ion
implementation and chemical vapor deposition systems, since 1993.
Ms. Dohren has been Vice President, Corporate Services since September 1997.
Prior to that, she served as Vice President, Human Resources and
Administration from August 1993 to September 1997.
Dr. Gesley was appointed Vice President, Technology Development in 1996. Prior
to that he held the position of Vice President, Engineering from 1995 to 1996.
He previously held a variety of engineering management roles at Etec
directing special development teams and other projects.
Mr. Herd was appointed Vice President, Business Development when he joined the
Company in January 1998. Mr. Herd joined Etec from Silicon Valley Group, a
semiconductor equipment manufacturer, where he served as Vice President of
Business Development from 1996 to January 1998 and as Vice President of
Operations, Track Systems Division from 1995 to 1996. Prior to joining Silicon
Valley Group, from 1992 to 1995 he was Director of Global Operations and
Deputy General Manager for a division of Applied Materials, a semiconductor
equipment company.
Mr. Wayman, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, joined Etec in June
1998. From 1990 to 1998 Mr. Wayman served as Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary of Storage Technology Corporation, a computer storage equipment
manufacturing company.
<PAGE>
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The Company's Common Stock has been traded on the Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol "ETEC" since October 24, 1995. As of September 21, 1998, there were
252 holders of record of the Company's outstanding Common Stock. The following
table sets forth the range of quarterly high and low closing sale prices of the
Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
High Low
--------- ---------
Fiscal 1998:
First Quarter............................... $67.125 $41.500
Second Quarter.............................. 51.250 35.875
Third Quarter............................... 61.375 42.375
Fourth Quarter.............................. 49.375 29.250
Fiscal 1997:
First Quarter............................... $38.250 $23.125
Second Quarter.............................. 44.750 25.407
Third Quarter............................... 45.125 27.500
Fourth Quarter.............................. 54.250 33.375
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Company has never declared or paid dividends on its capital stock and does
not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company
currently intends to retain its earnings, if any, for the development of its
business. Currently, the Company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from
paying dividends under the terms of its $50.0 million financing facility. In
addition, the lease of the Company's Hayward, California property restricts the
Company from paying cash dividends under certain conditions.
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA.
(in thousands except per share amounts):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended July 31,
-------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue........................ $288,327 $240,914 $145,645 $82,916 $68,710
Research, development and
engineering expenses............. $53,439 $34,373 $17,402 $10,497 $5,102
Income before extraordinary items.. $46,767 $34,439 $37,791 $4,524 $1,612
Net income ........................ $46,767 $34,439 $36,861 $9,936 $1,612
Net income per share-basic......... $2.13 $1.66 $2.22 $11.84 $2.32
Net income per share-diluted....... $2.05 $1.57 $2.02 $0.68 $0.12
Shares used in per share
calculation-basic................ 21,922 20,746 16,575 839 694
Shares used in per share
calculation-diluted.............. 22,789 22,003 18,296 14,594 14,008
Total assets....................... $358,514 $284,543 $208,871 $85,984 $62,782
Working capital.................... $195,112 $156,303 $111,199 $23,215 $6,184
Mandatorily redeemable convertible
preferred stock................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $76,397 $54,362
Long-term debt, including capital
lease obligations............... $ -- $ -- $6,939 $16,866 $31,251
Stockholders' equity(deficit)...... $246,669 $197,461 $115,877 ($67,415) ($76,341)
</TABLE>
Factors Affecting Comparability
Fiscal 1997 net income
o reflects the inclusion of a $1.2 million discrete release of a valuation
allowance previously recorded against deferred tax assets.
o reflects the write-off of $3.9 million of in-process technology acquired.
See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal 1996 net income
o reflects the inclusion of an extraordinary loss of $0.9 million recorded as
a result of the early extinguishment of debt.
o reflects the write-off of $6.3 million of in-process technology acquired.
See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
o reflects a $23.0 million tax benefit realized as a result of the discrete
release of a portion of the valuation allowance previously recorded
against deferred tax assets.
Fiscal 1995 net income
o reflects the inclusion of an extraordinary gain of $5.4 million recorded as
a result of the early extinguishment of $19.7 million of subordinated notes
payable and accrued interest.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
Overview of 1998
In fiscal 1998 Etec Systems, Inc. reported a year- over-year increase of
approximately 20% in revenue and a 21% increase in diluted earnings per share
after adjustments for nonrecurring charges in the prior year. These results
were achieved despite the difficult period experienced by the semiconductor
industry and its suppliers. The industry has seen the impacts of a dramatic
downturn in DRAM pricing, the Asian financial crisis and an unsettled personal
computer market driven by new market dynamics, including the below $1000 PC.
Numerous semiconductor device and equipment manufacturers announced layoffs,
plant closings and restructurings Etec's success in light of these events is
due to its ability to provide critical enabling technology. The semiconductor
industry requires technology from Etec, which allows smaller design rules and
integration of increasingly complex functions, to keep up with Moore's Law
projections that device performance will double every two years. In addition to
enabling increased performance, advanced masks from Etec machines allow new
users for semiconductors in a vast array of products. Fiscal 1998 brought
continued strong demand for Etec's advanced products. The ALTA(R) 3500 laser
beam production tool, introduced in July of 1997, has proven to be the most
accepted solution for 0.25 micron production maskwriting applications. The
MEBES 5000, an electron-beam raster scan system for high-throughput pilot
production of 0.18 micron devices, was introduced in fiscal 1998, and Etec
shipped its first system prior to the year end. A second new product
introduction, the DigiRite 2000 laser direct imaging system for printed circuit
board manufacturing, has been well received by the PCB industry, and the
product is entering volume production.
Etec designs, develops and manufactures these systems in state-of-the-art
facilities. With new facilities scheduled to be on line in California and
Oregon in the spring of 1999 and a new process laboratory in Arizona, Etec is
expanding its production capabilities and ensuring it maintains the most modern
manufacturing and research facilities available.
In addition to these achievements, Etec increased its cash position to $100
million, while at the same time repurchasing approximately $5.6 million of its
common stock.
Results of Operations
Years Ended July 31, 1998 and July 31, 1997
Revenue. Revenues comprise primarily sales of the Company's MEBES(R), CORE(R),
and ALTA(R) mask pattern generation systems, accessories and upgrades, and the
provision of technical support, maintenance and other services on such
products. Product sales, as a percentage of total revenue, increased from 86%
in fiscal 1997 to 87% in fiscal 1998, while service revenues decreased from 14%
to 13% of total revenue over the same period. Service revenue has not increased
at the same rate as product revenue, because average sales prices for the
Company's product offering have risen faster than the prices that the Company
has been able to negotiate on service contracts. Moreover, revenue from service
contracts does not begin until after the expiration of the product warranty
period, which is typically one year. The Company derives most of its revenues
from the sale of a small number of systems and upgrades. As such, any delay in
the recognition of revenue for a single system or upgrade can have a material
adverse effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations in a
particular period.
Product revenue increased 22% to $251.2 million from $206.6 million for the
years ended July 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. This increase primarily
reflects a change in mix towards new products, which have higher selling
prices because of the significant improvements that they offer. The
semiconductor business is currently experiencing some difficulty. Weak demand
for semiconductors could translate into reduced demand for masks and cause a
softening of the demand for the Company's products, which could materially
reduce revenue for fiscal 1999.
Service revenue increased 8% to $37.2 million from $34.4 million for the years
ended July 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively, due primarily to an increase in
the number of systems under service contracts.
Gross Profit. The Company's gross profit on product revenue increased 34% to
$144.6 million from $108.1 million for the years ended July 31, 1998 and 1997,
respectively. The increase results from an increase in product revenue and the
higher product gross margin, which increased to 58% from 52% for the years
ended July 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The increase in product gross
margin is primarily attributable to changes in product mix towards the
Company's newer products, which generally have higher gross margins than older
products. The Company anticipates that gross margin will remain relatively
constant or potentially decline in fiscal 1999. Margins could be negatively
impacted by a number of factors, including lower than expected volume,
especially if coupled with costs associated with new manufacturing facilities
starting in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999. Margins could also be adversely
affected by product mix skewing toward older, less expensive mask pattern
generation equipment or lower than anticipated margins in the laser direct
imaging business (the Company's Interconnect Products Group) where the Company
does not have significant past experience. Additional pressure on margins
could come from continued deterioration of Asian currencies relative to the
dollar, which would increase the effective cost of the Company's products to
its customers in that region. A combination of some or all of these factors
may have a material adverse effect on margins in fiscal 1999.
The Company's gross profit on service revenue increased 1% to $8.6 million
from $8.5 million for the years ended July 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Gross margin on service revenue was 23% and 25% for the years ended July 31,
1998 and 1997, respectively. The static gross profit and decreased gross
margin reflect higher revenues from an increase in the number of systems under
service contracts, offset by higher costs due to increased personnel required
to service the growing installed base and to improve customer satisfaction.
Research, Development and Engineering. The Company's research, development and
engineering expenses continue to reflect its commitment to higher levels of
product development effort. These expenses, net of third-party funding under
cooperative development agreements, increased to $53.4 million, representing
19% of revenue, from $34.4 million, representing 14% of revenue, for the years
ended July 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The increase is primarily due to
expenses incurred in the development of future generation ALTA and MEBES
systems, together with costs associated with preparing the initial "beta"
versions of the Company's new DigiRite? 2000 laser direct imaging system for
shipment from the Interconnect Products Group. Funding received under
cooperative development contracts was $5.6 million and $2.0 million for the
years ended July 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The increase is primarily
attributable to the achievement of milestones under the 1997 cost
reimbursement agreement with a private consortium, SEMATECH. In July 1998 the
Company was awarded a new four-year contract to develop advanced multiple
electron beam microcolumns for nanolithography. This award, from the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Naval Air Systems Command
(NAVAIR), will amount to approximately $4 million. Research and development
expense in fiscal 1999 could be higher than expected to the extent that the
Company is unable to meet milestones necessary to secure funding under its
cooperative development contracts.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased 17% to $32.6 million, representing 11% of revenue, from
$27.9 million, representing 12% of revenue, for the years ended July 31, 1998
and 1997, respectively. Fluctuations in selling, general and administrative
expenses were primarily due to increased headcount, offset by reduced sales
commissions payable on sales into Asia due to the expiration of some
agreements during fiscal 1998. For fiscal 1999 selling, general and
administrative expenses can be expected to increase due to a number of
factors, including higher distribution overhead for the direct laser imaging
products. The extent of this additional cost is not certain due to the
Company's limited past experience in this field.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the years ended July 31, 1998 and 1997
was $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The decrease in interest
expense is attributable to the repayment of term debt during fiscal year 1997.
Interest Income and Other, Net. Interest and other income was $4.5 million for
the year ended July 31, 1998, compared with $3.8 million in the year ended
July 31, 1997. This includes $4.3 million of interest income generated by the
Company's investment portfolio for the year ended July 31, 1998, compared with
$3.3 million for the year ended July 31, 1997. This increase is due to the
growth of the Company's investment portfolio and to the achievement of higher
average interest rates.
Income Tax Provision. The Company recorded provisions for income taxes for the
years ended July 31, 1998 and 1997 of $24.1 million and $18.8 million,
respectively. The Company's effective tax rate decreased from 35.5% in fiscal
1997 to 34% in fiscal 1998 primarily due to increased research and development
tax credits and increased benefits from the use of a foreign sales corporation.
Years Ended July 31, 1997 and July 31, 1996
Revenue. From fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997, product revenues increased faster
than service revenues, resulting in an increase in product revenues as a
percentage of total revenues from 78% in fiscal 1996 to 86% in fiscal 1997.
Product revenue increased 83% to $206.6 million from $112.9 million for the
years ended July 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. This increase reflected the
sale of thirteen additional systems, higher average selling prices, changes in
product mix and an increase in the sales of accessories and upgrades.
Service revenue increased 5% to $34.4 million from $32.7 million for the years
ended July 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. This increase primarily reflected
generally higher service activity caused by an increase in the number of
systems under service contracts.
Gross Profit. The Company's gross profit on product revenue increased 92% to
$108.1 million from $56.3 million for the years ended July 31, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. The increase in gross profit on product revenue was due both to
increased product shipments and a higher gross profit margin on product
revenue, which increased to 52% from 50% for the years ended July 31, 1997 and
1996, respectively. The increase in product gross margin was primarily
attributable to generally higher selling prices for the Company's products and
an increase in the level of sales of accessories (which tend to have higher
gross margins), as well as efficiencies resulting from improvements in
manufacturing.
The Company's gross profit on service revenue decreased 9% to $8.5 million
from $9.3 million for the years ended July 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Gross margin on service revenue was 25% and 28% for the years ended July 31,
1997 and 1996, respectively. The decreases in gross profit and gross margin
reflected an investment in service personnel and training to support the
increasing number of systems serviced.
Research, Development and Engineering. Research, development and engineering
expenses, net of third- party funding under cooperative development
agreements, increased to $34.4 million, representing 14.3% of revenue, from
$17.4 million, representing 12% of revenue, for the years ended July 31, 1997
and 1996, respectively. This increase primarily reflected the Company's
increased commitment to product development. In July 1997, the Company entered
into an agreement with a private consortium, SEMATECH, to develop a maskmaking
system for 0.15 micron device generation production and 0.13 micron device
development. Under the terms of this contract, the Company is entitled to
receive up to $12 million. In July 1997, the Company fulfilled the first
milestone under the contract and received $1.5 million. In addition, in June
1997, the Company entered into a cost-reimbursement research and development
agreement with the United States Department of Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA). No funding was recognized under the DARPA agreement
during fiscal 1997.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased to $27.9 million, representing 12% of revenue, from $21.3
million, or 15% of revenue, for the years ended July 31, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily due to market development fees on certain laser beam systems sold in
Asia, costs resulting from an increase in staffing, rent for the Company's
additional facilities, costs associated with being a public company and
increased profit sharing.
Write-Off of In-Process Technology Acquired. In the third quarter of fiscal
1997, the Company acquired all of the shares of Ebetech Electron Beam
Technology GmbH from VCB, the Venture Capital Company of Siemens AG, MRS
Technology, Inc. and a group of founding employees for $5.1 million. The
amount allocated to in-process technology of $3.9 million was written off in
the third quarter of fiscal 1997 because of the uncertainty as to realization.
In the third quarter of fiscal 1996, the Company acquired substantially all of
the assets and assumed certain specified liabilities of Polyscan, Inc. in
exchange for 350,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. The excess of the
purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of $6.3 million was
allocated to in-process technology acquired, which the Company wrote off in
the third quarter of fiscal 1996 because of the uncertainty as to realization.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the years ended July 31, 1997 and 1996
was $1.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively. The decrease in interest
expense was attributable to the reduction and refinancing of debt during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1996 and to the early repayment of a $10.0 million
term note. This repayment occurred in May 1997.
Interest Income and Other, Net. Interest and other income was $3.8 million for
the year ended July 31, 1997, compared with $2.7 million in the year ended
July 31, 1996. This includes $3.3 million of interest income generated by the
Company's investment portfolio for the year ended July 31, 1997. Included in
this category for the year ended July 31, 1996 were approximately $1.8 million
of interest earned on the investment of the proceeds from Etec's initial
public offering (the "IPO"), as well as $0.8 million of transaction gains on
the redemption of the minority interest in Etec Japan.
Income Tax Provision (Benefit). During the year ended July 31, 1997, the
Company recorded an income tax provision of $18.8 million. For the year ended
July 31, 1996, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $16.3 million.
The Company's provision for income taxes for the year ended July 31, 1997
reflected the discrete release of valuation allowances and the utilization of
tax credits and tax benefits from the use of a foreign sales corporation,
partially offset by foreign earnings taxed at higher rates and the write-off
of in- process technology related to the acquisition of Ebetech for which the
Company will not receive a tax benefit. The benefit for income taxes for the
year ended July 31, 1996 primarily reflected taxes payable by the Company's
foreign subsidiaries offset by a change in the valuation allowance.
Extraordinary Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. During the year ended July
31, 1996, the Company paid $18.7 million of its 10.65% senior secured notes
before their due dates. As a result of this full repayment of the senior
secured notes, the Company recorded an extraordinary loss of approximately
$0.9 million related to unamortized debt issuance costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In addition to its operational cash flows, in fiscal 1998 the Company entered
into agreements with its landlords under which they agreed to make investments
of up to $121.0 million for the construction of additional manufacturing
facilities under operating lease arrangements. The Company has used $27
million of the $121.0 million total in fiscal 1998 and believes that
approximately $92 million will be used in fiscal 1999 and $2 million in fiscal
2000 under these agreements. In fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1996 the Company raised
approximately $108.0 million from sales of its common stock in an initial
public offering, two additional public offerings, and a private placement. In
fiscal 1997, the Company received $5.0 million from the sale and leaseback of
its headquarters campus.
The Company has spent approximately $42.8 million for net capital expenditures
in fiscal 1998, including $27.0 million in facility construction that was
subsequently converted to a construction allowance under an operating lease.
The remaining $15.8 million of net capital expenditures in fiscal 1998 was
spent primarily to purchase land and testing and process equipment. The
Company has budgeted capital expenditures of approximately $38.0 million for
fiscal 1999, some of which may be financed.
In October 1997, the Company purchased approximately 4.2 acres of land in
Hayward, California for $0.9 million. This site provides the Company
flexibility for future expansion of its Hayward-based operations. In addition,
in November 1997, the Company completed the purchase of approximately 15.2
acres of land in Hillsboro, Oregon for approximately $2.4 million. The
Company is having a new facility constructed on this site to meet development
and manufacturing requirements for its laser mask pattern generation products
and to back up its electron-beam manufacturing capabilities in Hayward,
California. The new facilities in Hayward and Hillsboro are scheduled to be
completed in the middle of calendar year 1999. The amortization of the cost of
these facilities will increase the Company's manufacturing costs, starting in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999. There can be no assurance that revenue
growth and maintenance of product price levels will be adequate to completely
offset these costs.
As of July 31, 1998, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities of $100.3 million. The Company believes that existing cash balances
(including cash equivalents and marketable securities), together with other
sources of liquidity, including cash flows from operating activities and
amounts available under the existing $50.0 million revolving line of credit
(all of which was available at July 31, 1998), will provide adequate cash to
fund its operations for at least the next twelve months. The Company also
believes that success in its industry requires substantial capital in order to
maintain the flexibility to take advantage of opportunities as they arise. As
such, the Company may effect additional equity or debt financings from time to
time in the future.
Cash Flows from Operations
Net cash provided by operations for the fiscal years ended July 31, 1998,
1997, and 1996 was $13.5 million, $19.0 million, and $3.5 million,
respectively.
Cash flows from operating activities in fiscal 1998 primarily reflected net
income of $46.8 million, depreciation and amortization of $9.0 million and
deferred taxes of $5.1 million, offset by increases in accounts receivable of
$39.6 million, increases in factored accounts receivable of $11.4 million,
increases in inventory of $18.9 million and increases in other assets of $13.3
million.
Cash flows from operations in fiscal 1997 primarily reflected net income of
$34.4 million, decreased by noncash items (which include $2.1 million of
deferred taxes, the write-off of in-process technology acquired of $3.9
million, and depreciation and amortization of $4.6 million); increases in
accounts receivable of $18.5 million and inventory of $14.9 million; and
increases in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities of $9.5
million.
Cash flows from operations in fiscal 1996 primarily reflected net income of
$36.9 million, decreased by noncash items (which include $23.6 million of
deferred taxes, partially offset by an extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million, the write-off of in-process technology
acquired of $6.3 million, and depreciation and amortization of $1.6 million);
increases in accounts receivable of $15.7 million and inventory of $25.4
million; increases in other assets of $0.6 million; and increases in accounts
payable and accrued and other liabilities of $23.1 million.
Fluctuations in accounts receivable, inventory and current liabilities for all
of the above periods were caused primarily by the timing of system orders, the
timing of revenue recognition, the increase in unit shipments and the timing
of payments to vendors. The increases in accounts receivable are due to a
higher sales volume in comparison to the prior periods; a higher ratio of
sales in Asia, where payment terms are usually longer than for domestic
customers; and shipments of newer technology machines, where customer
acceptance is often extended. The increases in inventory are due to the
purchase of raw materials in anticipation of a higher order level than was
actually achieved and to an increased level of service parts. Any of these
events could recur in fiscal 1999. Also, in fiscal 1999 there is risk that
receivables could increase disproportionately to increased revenue due to
continued difficulties for the Company's Asian customers, as well as adverse
credit and collection experience for sales of direct laser imaging products,
which is a new business for the Company. Inventories in fiscal 1999 could be
adversely affected by the inability of the Company to achieve its expected
unit sale volume, due to the same factors discussed under Revenue, above,
coupled with inability to cancel or delay orders for raw materials.
Prior to the shipment of a system, the Company generally receives payment for
a portion of the system sales price. Such payments are generally received when
the Company accepts an order and at various points while the system is being
installed and thereafter. Therefore, the amount of customer advances at each
reporting period fluctuates based on the number of systems that are on order,
the timing of order acceptance, and the status of each system within the
manufacturing cycle. Advances from customers decreased to $10.3 million at
July 31, 1998 from $11.5 million at July 31, 1997. The backlog for products
decreased to $128.8 million at July 31, 1998, from $158.6 million at July 31,
1997.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the fiscal years ended July 31,
1998, 1997, and 1996 was $18.2 million, $40.4 million, and $37.9 million,
respectively.
Cash flows from investing activities in fiscal 1998 comprised net purchases of
marketable securities of $2.4 million and net capital expenditures of $26.8
million, offset by cash received from the sale of $11.0 million of building
improvements, which were leased back.
In February 1998, the Company entered into an agreement to amend the existing
lease on its Hayward facilities to accommodate a $50.0 million planned
expansion of production, research and development facilities and renovation of
existing production facilities via construction lease allowances. The lease
amendment also included the leaseback of an additional $11.0 million of
building improvements on existing facilities sold to the lessor via the lease
amendment. The initial term of the lease expires in May 2014, and, if not
cancelled by the Company, will be automatically extended for three five-year
renewal periods and one additional eight-month renewal period.
Cash flows from investing activities for fiscal 1997 primarily comprised net
capital expenditures of $27.1 million and net purchases of marketable
securities of $10.1 million, offset by proceeds from the sale and leaseback of
a new administrative building for $5.0 million. The Company sold the building
to its existing landlord and entered into a 15-year lease that is subject to
rental adjustments every three years.
Cash flows from investing activities for fiscal 1996 consisted mainly of net
purchases of marketable securities of $24.2 million and net capital
expenditures of $11.7 million.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal years ended July 31,
1998, 1997, and 1996 was $12.9 million, $33.5 million, and $56.2 million,
respectively.
Cash flows from financing activities for fiscal 1998 primarily reflected
receipts of $10.3 million from a third-party financing intermediary and
proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock of $8.2 million, offset by open
market purchases of the Company's stock totaling $5.6 million.
Cash flows from financing activities for fiscal 1997 primarily reflected
proceeds from issuance of common stock of $42.2 million, offset by repayments
of debt and capital leases of $10.2 million.
Cash flows from financing activities for fiscal 1996 consisted mainly of
proceeds from issuance of common stock of $67.6 million and from issuance of
debt of $10.0 million, offset by repayments of debt and capital leases of
$21.6 million.
During fiscal 1997, the Company repaid its outstanding term debt. In April
1997, the Company entered into an amendment to its existing credit agreement
with ABN-AMRO Bank, N.V. to expand its $20.0 million revolving credit line
expiring May 31, 1998 to a $50.0 million line of credit expiring May 31, 1999.
In April 1998, the term of this credit line was further extended to November
1999, and the covenants were revised to be substantially the same as those
under the Hillsboro, Oregon lease agreement (see Note 10 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). Indebtedness under the revolving credit facility and
term note is unsecured and bears interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate
(5.66% on July 31, 1998) plus 0.95%. The terms of the financing facility
require the Company to comply with certain financial and restrictive
covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios and minimum net
worth criteria, restrictions on incurring indebtedness, and certain dividend
restrictions. These covenants are substantially the same as those under the
Hillsboro, Oregon lease agreement. On May 31, 1996, the Company drew down the
$10.0 million term note to repay in full its senior secured notes, and in May
1997 repaid its term note in full. No prepayment penalties or debt issuance
costs were incurred. No amounts have been drawn under the revolving credit
facility.
During fiscal 1996, the Company repaid $18.7 million of its senior secured
indebtedness (which amount includes the $8.8 million referred to below), and
repaid $3.6 million of senior subordinated notes out of the proceeds of the
IPO. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996, the Company extinguished the
remaining $8.8 million of its senior secured indebtedness with the proceeds of
the $10.0 million term loan from ABN-AMRO Bank referred to above.
Other Factors Affecting Company Results
Potential Delays in Shipments
The Company derives most of its annual revenues from the sale of a small
number of systems and upgrades at prices currently ranging from approximately
$6.0 million to $13.0 million each for MEBES and ALTA systems, and from
approximately $1.0 million to $9.0 million each for upgrades. As a result, any
delay in the recognition of revenue for a single system or upgrade could have
a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations for a given
accounting period. For example, two system shipments planned for the second
and third quarters of fiscal 1998 were delayed, due to the failure of a
critical subassembly and to a problem in meeting a specification, and were
shipped instead in the third and fourth quarters, respectively. These delays
caused the Company to miss its revenue and earnings plan for the second
quarter of fiscal 1998.
Cyclicity of the Maskmaking and Semiconductor Industries and Dependence on the
Capital Spending Decisions of Customers
The Company's operating results depend on capital expenditures by maskmakers,
which in turn depend on the current and anticipated demand for masks,
integrated circuits made from masks, and products that use such integrated
circuits. The overall semiconductor industry has been, and is likely to
continue to be, cyclical with periods of oversupply. The current downturn in
the demand for semiconductors may reduce the demand for masks and could reduce
the demand for the Company's maskmaking equipment. The Company's ability to
reduce expenses in response to any such downturn is limited by its need for
continued investment in research and development and in customer service and
support. Previous downturns in capital investment by the maskmaking industry
have materially adversely affected the Company's business, financial
condition, and results of operations, and future downturns may have similar
material adverse effects. In addition, due to changes in semiconductor
manufacturing technology, the demand for maskmaking equipment has at times
been depressed while the demand for semiconductor devices has remained strong.
A downturn in demand for maskmaking equipment would have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Development of New Products and Enhancements
The semiconductor industry in general, and the maskmaking industry in
particular, are characterized by rapid technological change and evolving
industry standards. The failure or significant delay in the development,
manufacture or marketing of new products, or in the enhancement of existing
products, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that
the Company will continue to be successful in selecting, developing,
manufacturing and marketing new products or enhancements of existing products.
Damage to Manufacturing Facilities
The Company conducts all of its manufacturing activities for its core products
at its leased facilities in Hayward, California and Beaverton, Oregon. The
Company's Hayward campus, which includes the corporate headquarters, is
located in a seismically active area. Although the Company maintains business
interruption insurance, a major catastrophe (such as an earthquake or other
natural disaster) at the Hayward or Beaverton sites could result in a
prolonged interruption of the Company's business. All of the Company's MEBES
electron-beam systems are produced in Hayward, and all of its ALTA laser-beam
systems are produced in Beaverton. Neither facility is currently equipped to
produce the type of system produced by the other.
Competition
The Company has a number of competitors, including companies that have
significantly greater resources, such as Hitachi Ltd. While the Company
belives that its products benefit from a superior technical approach to mask
lithography, there can be no assurance that competitors will not develop
future generations of products that are superior in features, cost, or other
factors to the Company's product offerings at that time. Development of a
clearly superior competitive product for pattern generation mask lithography
would have a materially adverse impact on the Company.
Successful Integration of Acquired Businesses
The Company's business strategy includes expanding its product lines and
markets through acquisitions. Any acquisition may result in potentially
dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent
liabilities, potential reductions in income due to losses incurred by the
acquired business, and amortization expense related to intangible assets
acquired, any of which could materially adversely affect the Company's
financial condition and results of operations.
In March 1997, the Company acquired Ebetech Electron Beam Technology GmbH,
renamed Etec EBT. This subsidiary (which is part of the Display Products
Group) is engaged in the development of focused electron-beam test systems for
flat panel displays. These products are currently in the preliminary
development stage and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able
to introduce them successfully into the market.
In February 1996, the Company acquired Polyscan, Inc. a development-stage
company based in Tucson, Arizona that designs and develops laser direct
imaging systems for printed circuit board and multichip module applications.
Polyscan, Inc. has subsequently been merged into the Company's operations and
has become the Company's Interconnect Products Group (IPG). IPG has recognized
revenue on one system in fiscal 1998 and has incurred losses since its
inception. The Company expects that IPG will continue to incur losses for the
foreseeable future. The Company has never operated in the market segments
targeted by IPG.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to integrate IPG
successfully into its current business operations or will be able to integrate
the technology into the Company's product development strategy or to
manufacture, market, and sell its products successfully, or that its business
will ever become profitable. There can be no assurance of the effect of any
future acquisition on the Company's business or operating results.
International Sales and Operations
Sales to customers in countries other than the United States accounted for
74%, 72%, and 66% of revenues in fiscal 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.
The Company anticipates that international sales will continue to account for
a significant portion of revenues for the foreseeable future. Sales and
operations outside of the United States are subject to certain inherent risks,
including fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign
currencies, tariffs, quotas, taxes and other market barriers, political and
economic instability, restrictions on the export or import of technology,
potentially limited intellectual property protection, difficulties in staffing
and managing international operations, and potentially adverse tax
consequences. There can be no assurance that any of these factors will not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition
or results of operations. In particular, although the Company's international
sales are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars, currency exchange
fluctuations in countries where the Company does business, such as those
experienced recently in certain Asian countries, could materially adversely
affect the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Year 2000 Issue
Computer programs and systems that make use of dates represented by only two
digits (98 rather than 1998) may not operate properly after the year 2000.
Two- digit fields can cause problems with sorting, mathematical calculations
and comparisons when working with years outside the range of 1900 through
1999. The problem also potentially extends to any systems or devices that
include embedded technology, such as microchips.
The Company has established a formal project with a project office and project
team to address this issue and achieve Year 2000 (Y2K) readiness. The Company
has chosen the U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) Program Management
Model, as modified, to manage and measure its progress. The project focuses on
four key readiness areas: 1) Product readiness, addressing product
functionality; 2) Supplier readiness, addressing the preparedness of our
suppliers; 3) Internal infrastructure readiness, addressing mission-critical
internal information technology (IT) and non-IT systems; and 4) Customer
readiness, addressing customer preparedness and the Company's customer
support. For each readiness area, the Company is systematically performing an
enterprise-wide risk assessment, implementing the GAO Program Management Model
as a project, and developing contingency plans to mitigate unknown risk. The
Company is also communicating with its customers, suppliers, employees, and
other third- party business partners to reinforce awareness and to inform them
of its progress toward Year 2000 readiness. The Company is doing this through
a variety of media, including regular updates to the Y2K area of the corporate
web site. The Awareness and Assessment phases of the project have been
substantially completed and the Renovation phase commenced in May 1998. The
Company has engaged a third party to assist in its effort to ensure a
comprehensive effort is made to address the Y2K issue.
Product Readiness: A single test suite is used to test all of the Company's
products. This provides a complete assessment of potential Y2K impacts and
precludes inefficient use of resources that would result from the performance
of individual customer test suites. Etec is performing its testing in
accordance with SEMATECH Year 2000 Test Scenarios. The Company has
communicated to its customers the current status for each of its products, as
well as a proposed remediation plan and schedule.
Customer Readiness: The Company plans to commence making Year 2000 compliant
updates to its customers' systems through its standard Service Update Plan
process by January 1999, with completion planned by June 1999. A Monitoring
phase of the program is planned as well, which provides for the contingency of
customers experiencing issues with the validation and implementation phases of
the project.
Supplier Readiness: This aspect of the program is focused on minimizing risk
associated with the Company's suppliers in two areas: first, the supplier's
capability to provide Y2K compliant products and second, the supplier's
business capability to continue to provide the required products and services.
The Company is using the SEMATECH Year 2000 Readiness Supplier Questionnaire
as an aid in assessing risk. A supplier action list and contingency plans are
being developed based upon this assessment. Supplier issues that potentially
affect the Company's products are targeted to be resolved by December 1998.
Internal Infrastructure Readiness: The Company has completed an assessment of
its IT and non-IT applications and its business processes. Some applications
and processes have already been made Y2K compliant, while others are being
prioritized and assigned resources based upon their importance to the
Company's ability to conduct business. All implementations are scheduled to be
completed no later than July 1999.
The Company estimates that the total Year 2000 costs will range from $5 to $8
million, with the majority of these costs to be incurred over the next six
fiscal quarters. The Company is continuing its assessment and developing
alternatives that will result in a further refinement of this estimate over
time. There can be no assurance that actual costs will not differ materially
from the current estimate.
If computer systems used by the Company or its suppliers, or the software
applications used in systems manufactured and sold by the Company, fail or
experience significant difficulties, the Company's results of operations could
be materially affected.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this report that are prefaced with words such as "expects,"
"anticipates," "believes," or similar words and other statements of similar
sense are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the
Company's current expectations and estimates as to prospective events and
circumstances that may or may not be within the Company's control and as to
which there can be no firm assurances given. These forward-looking statements,
like any other forward-looking statements, involve risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or
anticipated.
Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" (SFAS
130). SFAS 130 establishes standards for reporting and display of
comprehensive income and requires the Company to report additional information
on comprehensive income to supplement the reporting of income. SFAS 130 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. Comparative
financial statements must be provided for all periods presented and require
reclassification adjustments. The Company will adopt SFAS 130 in the first
quarter of fiscal 1999.
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS 131). SFAS 131 establishes standards
for reporting information about operating segments in annual and interim
financial statements and also establishes standards for related disclosures
about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. SFAS 131
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company
will adopt SFAS 131 in the first quarter of fiscal 1999.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133). SFAS 133 establishes new standards of
accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
SFAS 133 requires that all derivatives be recognized at their fair value in
the statement of financial position and the corresponding gains or losses be
either reported in the statement of operations or as a component of
comprehensive income, depending on the type of hedging relationship that
exists. The Company will adopt SFAS 133 in fiscal 2000 and does not expect its
provisions to have a material effect on the Company's presentation of its
consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk. As of July 31, 1998, the Company's cash and investment
portfolio includes fixed-income securities. These securities are subject to
interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. Due
to the short duration of the Company's investment portfolio, an immediate 10%
increase in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair market
value of the Company's portfolio. The Company has the ability to hold its
fixed income investments until maturity, and therefore the Company would not
expect its operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant
degree by the effect of a sudden change in market interest rates on its
securities portfolio.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. The majority of the Company's sales are
denominated in U.S. dollars and as a result, the Company has relatively little
exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. However, the Company enters into
forward exchange contracts to hedge certain intercompany exposures denominated
in foreign currencies. These forward exchange contracts are denominated in the
same currency as the underlying transaction. The Company does not use
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The
effect of an immediate 10% change in exchange rates on the forward contracts
would not have a material impact on the Company's future operating results or
cash flows.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ETEC SYSTEMS INC.
Report of Independent Accountants
Consolidated Balance Sheets at July 31, 1998 and 1997
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended July 31, 1998, 1997, 1996
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended July 31,
1998,1997, and 1996
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended July 31, 1998, 1997,
and 1996
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, are not
applicable, or the information is included in the financial statements or notes
thereto.
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Etec
Systems, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the
Index appearing under Item 14(a)1 on page 42 present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Etec Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries
at July 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 1998, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards, which require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by the management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
San Jose, California
August 24, 1998
<PAGE>
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
July 31,
----------------------
1998 1997
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................... $63,600 $55,975
Marketable securities............................... 36,689 34,262
Accounts receivable, less allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1,226 and $1,136............. 84,529 54,879
Inventory........................................... 86,512 67,202
Deferred tax assets................................. 17,902 22,822
Other current assets................................ 11,322 3,322
---------- ----------
Total current assets.............................. 300,554 238,462
Property, plant, and equipment, net................... 48,970 42,013
Other assets.......................................... 8,990 4,068
---------- ----------
$358,514 $284,543
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.................................... $26,506 $20,830
Accrued and other liabilities....................... 60,804 53,028
Taxes payable....................................... 18,132 8,301
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities......................... 105,442 82,159
Deferred gain on sale of asset........................ 2,649 2,871
Other liabilities..................................... 3,754 1,872
---------- ----------
Total liabilities................................. 111,845 86,902
---------- ----------
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share;
10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
and outstanding.................................... -- --
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share;
60,000,000 and 40,000,000 shares authorized;
21,977,070 and 21,679,636 issued and outstanding... 220 217
Warrants............................................ 600 631
Additional paid-in capital.......................... 201,327 198,758
Notes receivable from stockholders.................. -- (201)
Cumulative translation adjustments.................. (1,200) (719)
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)............. 45,722 (1,045)
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity........................ 246,669 197,641
---------- ----------
$358,514 $284,543
========== ==========
</TABLE>
See the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements
<PAGE>
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended July 31,
-------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Products...................................... $251,154 $206,561 $112,940
Services...................................... 37,173 34,353 32,705
--------- --------- ---------
288,327 240,914 145,645
--------- --------- ---------
Cost of revenue:
Cost of products.............................. 106,585 98,416 56,632
Cost of services.............................. 28,585 25,871 23,410
--------- --------- ---------
135,170 124,287 80,042
--------- --------- ---------
Gross profit.................................... 153,157 116,627 65,603
--------- --------- ---------
Operating expenses:
Research, development, and engineering........ 53,439 34,373 17,402
Selling, general, and administrative.......... 32,596 27,939 21,269
Write-off of in-process technology acquired... -- 3,874 6,269
--------- --------- ---------
86,035 66,186 44,940
--------- --------- ---------
Income from operations.......................... 67,122 50,441 20,663
Interest expense................................ (765) (988) (1,824)
Other income (expense), net..................... 4,503 3,821 2,669
--------- --------- ---------
Income before income tax provision (benefit)
and extraordinary items........................ 70,860 53,274 21,508
Income tax provision (benefit).................. 24,093 18,835 (16,283)
--------- --------- ---------
Income before extraordinary items............... 46,767 34,439 37,791
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment
of debt........................................ -- -- (930)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income...................................... 46,767 34,439 36,861
Accretion of mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred stock.................... -- -- 1,078
--------- --------- ---------
Net income attributable to Common Stockholders.. $46,767 $34,439 $35,783
========= ========= =========
Net income per share data-basic:
Income before extraordinary items............. $2.13 $1.66 $2.28
Extraordinary loss............................ -- -- ($0.06)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income.................................... $2.13 $1.66 $2.22
========= ========= =========
Shares used in per-share calculation-basic...... 21,922 20,746 16,575
========= ========= =========
Net income per share data-diluted:
Income before extraordinary items............. $2.05 $1.57 $2.07
Extraordinary loss............................ -- -- ($0.05)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income.................................... $2.05 $1.57 $2.02
========= ========= =========
Shares used in per-share calculation-diluted.... 22,789 22,003 18,296
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements
<PAGE>
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Retained
Earnings
Common Stock Additional Cumulative (Accumu-
------------------ Paid-in Notes Translation lated
Shares Amount Warrants Capital Receivable Adjustments Deficit) Total
----------- ------ --------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at July 31,
1995................... 910,402 $9 $562 $400 ($55) $2,936 ($71,267) ($67,415)
Stock offerings......... 5,374,167 54 -- 56,903 -- -- -- 56,957
Shares and warrants
issued to equity
investor............... 500,000 5 600 9,895 -- -- -- 10,500
Shares issued in
connection with the
Polyscan acquisition... 350,000 4 -- 3,496 -- -- -- 3,500
Issuance of warrants.... -- -- 1,031 -- -- -- -- 1,031
Exchange of ATEQ stock
for Common Stock....... 66,915 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Accretion of Mandatorily
Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock
redemption value....... -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,078) (1,078)
Conversion of
Mandatorily Redeemable
Convertible Preferred
Stock.................. 11,747,057 118 -- 77,357 -- -- -- 77,475
Payments on notes
receivable............. -- -- -- -- 38 -- -- 38
Issuance under stock
plans.................. 227,415 2 -- 731 -- -- -- 733
Exercise of warrants.... 435,008 4 (1,097) 1,093 -- -- -- --
Cumulative translation
adjustments............ -- -- -- -- -- (2,725) -- (2,725)
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- -- -- 36,861 36,861
----------- ------ --------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------
Balance at July 31,
1996................... 19,610,964 196 1,096 149,875 (17) 211 (35,484) 115,877
Stock offering.......... 1,254,487 13 -- 39,264 -- -- -- 39,277
Payments on notes
receivable............. -- -- -- -- 116 -- -- 116
Issuance of notes
receivable............. -- -- -- -- (300) -- -- (300)
Issuance under stock
plans.................. 633,921 6 -- 2,908 -- -- -- 2,914
Exercise of warrants.... 180,264 2 (465) 683 -- -- -- 220
Tax benefit of stock
option transactions.... -- -- -- 6,028 -- -- -- 6,028
Cumulative translation
adjustments............ -- -- -- -- -- (930) -- (930)
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,439 34,439
----------- ------ --------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------
Balance at July 31,
1997................... 21,679,636 217 631 198,758 (201) (719) (1,045) 197,641
Payments on notes
receivable............. -- -- -- -- 201 -- -- 201
Issuance under stock
plans.................. 389,743 4 -- 5,859 -- -- -- 5,863
Exercise of warrants.... 72,691 1 (31) 30 -- -- -- --
Shares repurchased...... (165,000) (2) -- (5,581) (5,583)
Tax benefit of stock
option transactions.... -- -- -- 2,261 -- -- -- 2,261
Cumulative translation
adjustments............ -- -- -- -- -- (481) -- (481)
Net income.............. -- -- -- -- -- -- 46,767 46,767
----------- ------ --------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------
Balance at July 31,
1998................... 21,977,070 $220 $600 $201,327 $ -- ($1,200) $45,722 $246,669
=========== ====== ========= ========== ========== =========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
See the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements
<PAGE>
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended July 31,
-----------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income..................................... $46,767 $34,439 $36,861
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt...................... -- -- 930
Write-off of in-process technology acquired.. -- 3,874 6,269
Depreciation and amortization................ 8,999 4,632 1,629
Deferred taxes............................... 5,058 2,103 (23,564)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable........................ (39,625) (18,502) (15,743)
Factoring of accounts receivable .......... 11,400 -- --
Inventory.................................. (18,928) (14,911) (25,393)
Other assets............................... (13,335) (2,139) (579)
Accounts payable........................... 5,676 6,772 7,724
Accrued and other liabilities.............. 7,512 2,712 15,348
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities...... 13,524 18,980 3,482
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures for property and
equipment, net................................ (26,765) (27,075) (11,673)
New building construction costs................ -- (3,555) (1,445)
Purchase of marketable securities, net......... (2,427) (10,109) (24,153)
Loan to Polyscan, Inc., net and other.......... -- -- (637)
Payment for purchase of Ebetech, net of cash
acquired...................................... -- (4,682) --
Proceeds from sale of facilities............... 11,000 5,000 --
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities.................................... (18,192) (40,421) (37,908)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of debt and capital leases........... (132) (10,171) (21,631)
Issuance of long-term debt..................... -- -- 10,000
Financing from intermediary, net of repayments. 10,260 3,796 159
Repurchase of warrants......................... (31) (2,633) --
Issuance of notes payable...................... -- 500 --
Issuance(payment)of notes receivable to stockhol 201 (184) --
Repurchase of Common Stock (5,583) -- --
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock......... 8,155 42,171 67,628
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities...... 12,870 33,479 56,156
--------- --------- ---------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash........ (577) (535) (896)
--------- --------- ---------
Net change in cash and cash equivalents........ 7,625 11,503 20,834
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
the year...................................... 55,975 44,472 23,638
--------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of
the year...................................... $63,600 $55,975 $44,472
========= ========= =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow
information:
Cash paid during the period for interest....... $697 $982 $2,001
========= ========= =========
Cash paid during the period for income taxes... $5,263 $8,229 $2,972
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements
<PAGE>
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1-THE COMPANY AND ITS SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Etec Systems, Inc. (the "Company") designs, develops, manufactures, markets,
and services electron-beam and laser-beam pattern generation equipment for the
semiconductor industry. The Company has operations in the United States, Japan,
Korea, Taiwan, Germany, and France. The Company operates in one industry
segment.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
all of its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated
in consolidation. Accounts denominated in foreign currencies are translated
using the foreign currencies as the functional currencies. Assets and
liabilities of foreign operations are translated to U.S. dollars at current
rates of exchange; revenues and expenses are translated using weighted average
rates. Gains and losses from foreign currency translation are included as a
separate component of stockholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains
and losses are included as a component of other income (expense), net.
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles, requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could vary materially from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Product revenue is generally recognized upon shipment. Billing takes place in
accordance with the contract terms. Typically a portion of the total equipment
sales price is billable at the time of taking the order, on customer's
acceptance at the company's manufacturing facility and on final acceptance at
the customer's facility. A provision for installation costs and estimated
future warranty costs is recorded at the time revenue is recognized. Revenue
associated with retrofitting certain models is recognized upon completion of
the retrofit. Service revenue is deferred and is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the period of service.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being
determined under the first- in, first-out method.
Property and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years
for machinery and equipment. Assets held under capital leases are amortized
using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the
estimated useful lives of the assets of three to five years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of
the lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvement.
Capitalization of Internal Use Software
The Company capitalizes certain costs related to the purchase of software for
internal use and its implementation, which include purchased software,
consulting fees, and the use of certain specified Company resources. As of
July 31, 1998 and 1997, $10.6 and $9.8 million of costs, respectively, (net of
accumulated depreciation) associated with internal use software had been
capitalized.
Research, Development and Engineering
Research, development and engineering costs are expensed as incurred. The
Company is party to certain contracts that provide for partial funding of
certain research, development and engineering costs. Amounts funded under
these contracts are recognized as costs are incurred.
Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations
of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash investments, marketable
securities, and accounts receivable. The Company places its temporary cash
investments and marketable securities with financial institutions and other
creditworthy issuers, and it limits the amount of credit exposure to any one
party.
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses if factored receivables become
uncollectible; however, collectibility issues are not expected with any
outstanding customer balances because factoring was on a non recourse basis.
The Company's accounts receivable are derived primarily from sales to
customers located in the United States, Europe, and the Far East. The Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers. Additionally, prior to
shipment of systems, the Company generally receives payment for a portion of
the system sales price. Write-offs during the periods presented have been
insignificant.
At July 31, 1998, receivables from one customer represented 15% of the
Company's accounts receivable. At July 31, 1997, outstanding receivables from
four customers represented 22%, 17%, 14% and 11%, respectively, of the
Company's accounts receivable.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has elected to follow the Accounting Principles Board's Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (APB 25) and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options and stock purchase
plan. Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is
disclosed as required by the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS 123), which
also requires that the information be determined as if the Company accounted
for its stock-based compensation subsequent to July 31, 1995 under the fair
value method of that Statement (see Note 7-Benefit Plans).
Net Income Per Share
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS
128), "Earnings Per Share," in the second fiscal quarter of 1998. Under the
provisions of SFAS 128, primary earnings per share have been replaced by basic
net income per share, which does not include the dilutive effect of stock
options in its calculation. In addition, fully diluted earnings per share have
been replaced by diluted net income per share. All prior period earnings per
share amounts have been restated to reflect the requirements of SFAS 128. Basic
net income per share has been computed using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share has
been computed using the weighted average number of common shares and
equivalents (representing the dilutive effect of stock options) outstanding
during the period. Net income has not been adjusted for any period presented
for purposes of computing basic and diluted net income per share.
For purposes of computing diluted net income per share, weighted average
potential common shares do not include stock options with an exercise price
that exceeds the average fair market value of the Company's common stock for
the period. The number of shares excluded from the computation for fiscal 1998,
1997, and 1996 were 262,700, 702,060, and 353,280 at an average price of
$47.75, $35.38, and $14.55, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" (SFAS
130). SFAS 130 establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive
income and requires the Company to report additional information on
comprehensive income to supplement the reporting of income. SFAS 130 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. Comparative
financial statements must be provided for all periods presented and require
reclassification adjustments. The Company will adopt SFAS 130 in the first
quarter of fiscal 1999.
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS 131). SFAS 131 establishes standards
for reporting information about operating segments in annual and interim
financial statements and also establishes standards for related disclosures
about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. SFAS 131 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company will
adopt SFAS 131 in the first quarter of fiscal 1999.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133). SFAS 133 establishes new standards of
accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
SFAS 133 requires that all derivatives be recognized at their fair value in the
statement of financial position and the corresponding gains or losses be either
reported in the statement of operations or as a component of comprehensive
income, depending on the type of hedging relationship that exists. The Company
has not yet determined the effect of adopting SFAS 133, which will be effective
for the Company's fiscal year 2000.
NOTE 2 - CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments having a maturity of
three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
The Company has classified all investments as available for sale. Investments
classified as available for sale are recorded at fair value and any temporary
difference between an investment's cost and fair value is recorded as a
separate component of stockholders' equity. Temporary differences between cost
and fair value for the years ended July 31, 1998 and July 31, 1997 were not
material.
Information about the types of cash equivalents and marketable securities held
is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
July 31,
-------------------
1998 1997
--------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash ................................. $6,966 $24,995
Money market funds ................... 38,683 8,810
Municipal obligations ................ 17,951 13,077
Corporate debt obligaitons ........... -- 7,092
Obligations of U.S. government agencies -- 2,001
--------- ---------
$63,600 $55,975
========= =========
Marketable securities:
Municipal obligations ................ 30,565 5,158
Obligations of U.S. government agencies 2,043 6,905
Corporate debt securities ............ 4,081 22,199
--------- ---------
$36,689 $34,262
========= =========
$100,289 $90,237
========= =========
</TABLE>
Information about the contractual maturities of marketable securities at July
31, 1998 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Due in Due after
one year one year
or through
less five years
--------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Municipal obligations ................ 19,778 10,787
Obligations of U.S. government agencies -- 2,043
Corporate debt obligaitons ........... 4,081 --
--------- ---------
$23,859 $12,830
========= =========
</TABLE>
NOTE 3--CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
July 31,
-------------------
1998 1997
--------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Inventory:
Purchased parts........................ $30,407 $20,325
Work-in-process........................ 35,554 35,972
Spares................................. 20,551 10,905
--------- ---------
$86,512 $67,202
========= =========
Property, plant, and equipment:
Buildings.............................. $9,882 $8,142
Machinery and equipment................ 62,624 48,599
--------- ---------
72,506 56,741
Less accumulated depreciation............ (23,536) (14,728)
--------- ---------
$48,970 $42,013
========= =========
Accrued and other liabilities:
Customer advances...................... $10,268 $11,451
Accrued employee costs................. 10,973 9,133
Accrued warranty and installation...... 11,220 11,121
Payable to financing intermediary...... 18,718 8,458
Other accrued liabilities.............. 9,625 12,865
--------- ---------
$60,804 $53,028
========= =========
</TABLE>
- ---------
NOTE 4-LONG-TERM DEBT
During fiscal 1997, the Company repaid its outstanding term debt. In April
1997, the Company entered into an amendment to its existing credit agreement
with ABN-AMRO Bank, N.V. to expand its $20.0 million revolving credit line
expiring May 31, 1998 to a $50.0 million line of credit expiring May 31, 1999.
In April 1998, the term of this credit line was further extended to November
1999, and the covenants were revised to be substantially the same as those
under the Hillsboro, Oregon lease agreement (see Note 9). Indebtedness under
the revolving credit facility and term note is unsecured and bears interest at
the London Interbank Offered Rate (5.66% on July 31, 1998) plus 0.95%. The
terms of the financing facility require the Company to comply with certain
financial and restrictive covenants, including maintenance of certain
financial ratios and minimum net worth criteria, restrictions on incurring
indebtedness, and certain dividend restrictions. On May 31, 1996, the Company
drew down the $10.0 million term note to repay in full its senior secured
notes, and in May 1997 repaid its term note in full. No prepayment penalties
or debt issuance costs were incurred. No amounts have been drawn under the
revolving credit facility.
NOTE 5-STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common and Preferred Stock
In October 1995, the Company completed the initial public offering (the "IPO")
of 4,200,000 shares of Common Stock, of which 3,841,667 shares were issued and
sold by the Company and 358,333 shares were sold by stockholders. The IPO
raised approximately $35.7 million before deducting offering expenses. In
November 1995, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an
additional 630,000 shares of Common Stock from the Company at $10.00 per share
before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. Net proceeds to the
Company in connection with this purchase totaled approximately $5.9 million.
In connection with the IPO, holders of mandatorily redeemable convertible
preferred stock converted their shares into 11,747,057 shares of Common Stock.
In June 1996, the Company completed an additional public offering of 4,350,000
shares of Common Stock, of which 250,000 shares were issued and sold by the
Company and 4,100,000 shares were sold by stockholders. The offering raised
approximately $5.0 million before deducting offering expenses. In July 1996,
in connection with this offering, the underwriters exercised their option to
purchase an additional 652,500 shares of Common Stock from the Company at
$20.00 per share before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. Net
proceeds to the Company in connection with this purchase totaled approximately
$12.4 million.
In June 1996, the Company issued and sold 500,000 shares of Common Stock in a
private transaction for a price of $10.0 million.
In December 1996, the Company completed a public offering of 5,029,916 shares
of Common Stock, of which 500,000 shares were issued and sold by the Company
and 4,529,916 shares were sold by stockholders. In December 1996, the
underwriters of the public offering exercised their option to purchase an
additional 754,487 shares of Common Stock from the Company. All of these
shares were sold at $33.25 per share before deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions. Net proceeds to the Company from the offering totaled
approximately $39.3 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and
estimated offering expenses.
In January 1997, the Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan.
Under the plan, the Board of Directors issued rights to acquire Series A
Participating Preferred Stock. The number of shares constituting such series
is equal to the number of shares of authorized Common Stock divided by 100.
The holders of the Series A Participating Preferred Stock would have 100 votes
for each share held by them. Holders of the Series A Participating Preferred
Stock would be entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Board of
Directors of the Registrant, commencing after the close of business on January
31, 1997, a dividend of $1,600 per share. No shares of Series A Participating
Preferred Stock have yet been issued, as the conditions necessary for the
exercise of rights have not yet occurred.
The Company's Articles of Incorporation were amended on January 30, 1997 to
increase the authorized stock to 50,000,000 shares. Such shares include
40,000,000 shares of Common Stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and
10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.
The Company's Articles of Incorporation were further amended on December 30,
1997 to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 60,000,000
shares with a par value of $0.01 per share.
In June 1998, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30
million of Common Stock. Shares may be repurchased at prevailing market prices
from time to time. In fiscal 1998, the Company repurchased 165,000 shares of
Common Stock for approximately $5.6 million at an average price of $33.84 per
share.
NOTE 6-INCOME TAXES
The components of income before income tax provision (benefit) and
extraordinary items are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended July 31,
-----------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Domestic................................. $62,793 $49,604 $15,870
Foreign.................................. 8,067 3,670 5,638
--------- --------- ---------
$70,860 $53,274 $21,508
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended July 31,
-----------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal.................................. $12,660 $9,906 $2,179
State.................................... 1,248 1,869 1,187
Foreign.................................. 5,127 4,957 3,915
--------- --------- ---------
19,035 16,732 7,281
--------- --------- ---------
Deferred:
Federal.................................. 5,090 2,441 (20,623)
State.................................... 464 267 (2,357)
Foreign.................................. (496) (605) (584)
--------- --------- ---------
5,058 2,103 (23,564)
--------- --------- ---------
Income tax provision (benefit)............. $24,093 $18,835 ($16,283)
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The income tax provision (benefit) differs from the amount computed by
applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended July 31,
-----------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income tax provision at U.S. statutory rate. $24,800 $18,646 $7,563
State income taxes, net of federal income
tax benefit................................ 2,036 1,389 1,187
Credits .................................... (4,762) -- --
Purchase accounting non-taxable write-offs.. -- 2,014 2,194
Foreign earnings taxed at higher rates...... 720 2,349 2,103
Foreign sales corporation................... (3,089) (1,370) --
Realized deferred tax assets previously
reserved................................... -- -- (7,160)
Change in valuation allowance........... 3,034 (3,921) (22,980)
Other....................................... 1,354 (272) 810
--------- --------- ---------
Total..................................... $24,093 $18,835 ($16,283)
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The Company's effective tax rate decreased from 35.5% in fiscal 1997 to 34% in
fiscal 1998 primarily due to increased research and development tax credits
and increased benefits from the use of a foreign sales corporation.
The components of deferred taxes are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
July 31,
-------------------
1998 1997
--------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Current:
Nondeductible accruals and reserves............. $14,656 $17,865
Uniform capitalization adjustment to inventory.. 1,121 1,892
Revenue recognized for tax return purposes and
deferred for financial statements.............. 806 --
Net operating loss carryforwards................ -- 2,297
Other........................................... 2,390 768
Valuation allowance............................. (1,071) --
--------- ---------
Net current deferred tax asset.................. 17,902 22,822
--------- ---------
Noncurrent:
Deferred gain on sale of asset.................. 1,129 1,213
Other........................................... 2,047 138
Valuation allowance............................. (3,176) (1,213)
--------- ---------
Net noncurrent deferred tax asset............... -- 138
--------- ---------
Net deferred tax asset.......................... $17,902 $22,960
========= =========
</TABLE>
The Company has included in its deferred tax assets a valuation allowance for
the years ended July 31, 1998 and 1997 of $4.2 million and $1.2 million,
respectively. The valuation allowance has been recorded against certain
foreign deferred tax assets and certain noncurrent tax assets as the
realizability is not assured at the balance sheet date.
NOTE 7-BENEFIT PLANS
Stock Option Plans
The Company grants options to employees and non- employee directors to
purchase shares of its Common Stock. As of July 31, 1998, the Company had an
aggregate of 4,996,836 common shares reserved for issuance under its employee
equity plans (Employee Plans). There were 478,641 shares available for grant
under the Employee Plans as of July 31, 1998. Currently the only plan under
which the Company grants options to employees is the 1995 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. Options to non-employee directors are granted under the 1995 Directors'
Plan (the Directors' Plan). As of July 31, 1998, the company had 150,000
shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Directors' Plan, of
which 47,000 shares were available for grant. All options granted under any of
the plans have been for a term of ten years, with an exercise price equal to
the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant of the option. For
grants to employees, the vesting period has generally been 25% per year over
the four years following the date of grant. Grants to directors vest over a
period of between one and two years after the date of grant.
Following is a summary of the activities in the Employee and Directors' Plans
for the past three years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted
Average
Options Exercise
Outstanding Price
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding, July 31, 1995............ 1,144,932 $1.53
Granted............................. 760,382 $15.52
Canceled............................ (19,409) $3.18
Exercised........................... (165,695) $0.47
-----------
Outstanding, July 31, 1996............ 1,720,210 $7.71
Granted............................. 888,964 $38.61
Canceled............................ (148,637) $9.15
Exercised........................... (565,854) $2.59
-----------
Outstanding, July 31, 1997............ 1,894,683 $23.30
Granted............................. 1,134,116 $41.25
Canceled............................ (55,935) $29.31
Exercised........................... (289,188) $9.32
-----------
Outstanding, July 31, 1998............ 2,683,676 $32.26
===========
</TABLE>
At July 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, options were exercisable for 589,927;
345,773; and 508,376 shares, respectively.
Significant option groups outstanding at July 31, 1998, related weighted
average exercise price per share of options granted and contractual life
information are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
----------------------------------- -----------------------
Weighted
Average Weighted Weighted
Remaining Average Average
Range of Contractual Exercise Exercise
Exercise Prices Shares Life (Years) Price Shares Price
- ----------------- ------------ ----------- ---------- ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0.01 - $ 4.00 292,838 6.29 $2.39 215,934 $2.02
$ 4.88 - $ 31.19 559,066 7.90 $19.45 176,859 $19.60
$ 31.50 - $ 34.38 624,550 9.80 $34.30 3,374 $32.22
$ 34.75 - $ 42.50 782,230 8.84 $40.39 186,754 $40.24
$ 42.75 - $67.13 424,992 9.33 51.72 7,006 44.46
------------ ------------
Total 2,683,676 589,927
============ ============
</TABLE>
As described in Note 1, the Company has adopted the disclosure provisions as
required by SFAS 123. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in
the Company's statements of operations, as all options were granted at an
exercise price per share equal to the market value of the Company's common
stock on the date of grant.
As required by SFAS 123 for pro forma disclosure purposes only, the Company
has calculated the estimated grant date fair value using the Black- Scholes
model. The Black-Scholes model, as well as other currently accepted option
valuation models, was developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable,
fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly
differ from the Company's stock option awards. These models also require
highly subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and
expected time until exercise, which greatly affect the calculated grant date
fair value.
The following weighted average assumptions are included in the estimated grant
date fair value calculations for the Company's stock option awards:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected life (years)................. 5 5 5
Risk-free interest rate............... 5.6% 6.4% 6.0%
Volatility............................ 56% 53% 53%
Dividend yield........................ -- -- --
</TABLE>
The weighted average estimated grant date fair value, as defined by SFAS 123,
for options granted during 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $19.37, $17.44, and $7.35
per share subject to option, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Since July 1995, the Company has offered an Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) under which rights are granted to purchase shares of Common Stock at
85% of the lesser of the market value of such shares at the beginning of an
eighteen-month offering period or at the end of each six-month segment within
the offering period. Under the ESPP, the Company is authorized to grant
options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. During
fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, 100,555; 68,067; and 39,189 shares, respectively,
were purchased at prices ranging from $8.57 to $34.21 per share. Shares
available for future purchase under the ESPP totaled 292,189 at July 31, 1998.
The following weighted average assumptions are included in the estimated grant
date fair value calculations under the ESPP:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected life (years)................. 0.5 0.5 0.5
Risk-free interest rate............... 5.6% 6.4% 6.0%
Volatility............................ 56% 53% 53%
Dividend yield........................ -- -- --
</TABLE>
Compensation cost (included in pro forma net income and net income per share
amounts only) for the grant date fair value, as defined by SFAS 123, of the
purchase rights granted under the ESPP was calculated using the Black-Scholes
model. Included in the pro forma net income for fiscal 1998, 1997, and 1996 is
compensation expense related to purchase rights granted during fiscal 1998.
The weighted average estimated grant date fair value per share for rights
granted under the ESPP, as defined by SFAS 123, for stock purchased under the
ESPP during fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $10.66; $6.07; and $6.68 per share,
respectively.
Pro forma results
Had the Company recorded compensation costs based on the estimated grant date
fair value (as defined by SFAS 123) for awards granted under its stock option
plans and employee stock purchase plan, the pro forma effect on net income and
net income per share would be as set forth below. These pro forma statements
take into consideration pro forma compensation related only to grants made
after December 15, 1995. Consequently, the pro forma effect on net income and
net income per share for fiscal 1998, 1997, and 1996 is not necessarily
representative of the pro forma effect on net income in future years.
Pro forma results for fiscal 1998, 1997, and 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(in thousands, except share amounts)
Pro forma net income.................. $38,403 $31,447 $35,320
Pro forma net income per share-basic.. $1.75 $1.52 $2.13
Pro forma net income per share-diluted $1.72 $1.49 $2.07
</TABLE>
401(k) Plan
On June 15, 1990, the Company adopted a 401(k) savings plan that covers all
eligible employees. The Company contributed approximately $0.5 million, $0.4
million and $0.2 million to the Plan during the years ended July 31, 1998,
1997, and 1996, respectively.
NOTE 8-RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Sales to related parties included in product and service revenue in fiscal
1996 were approximately $21.6 million. Sales to related parties during fiscal
1997 and 1998 were insignificant were $176.2 million, $138.5 million, and
$72.7 million for the years ended July 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.
NOTE 9-COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In November 1997, the Company completed the purchase of approximately 15.2
acres of land in Hillsboro, Oregon at a cost of approximately $2.4 million.
The Company is having a new facility constructed on this site to meet
development and manufacturing requirements for its laser mask pattern
generation products.
In December 1997, the Company entered into an agreement to lease the facility
to be constructed on the land described above. The lessor of the buildings has
committed to spend up to $60.0 million for construction and the Company will
act as construction agent for the lessor. The lease term begins upon
completion of construction (which is expected in the middle of calendar year
1999) and ends in November 2004. With the approval of the lessor, the Company
may extend the lease term for up to three one-year periods. The Company has
the option to purchase the facility at any time during the lease term at the
lessor's capitalized cost. If the Company does not elect to purchase the
property at the end of the lease term, the Company is required to guarantee
the minimum residual value, not to exceed $49.8 million. Management believes
that the contingent liability relating to this residual value guarantee does
not currently have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position or results of operations. The agreement also requires the Company to
comply with certain financial covenants. At July 31, 1998, the Company was in
compliance with these covenants.
In February 1998, the Company entered into an agreement to amend the existing
lease on its Hayward facilities to accommodate a $50.0 million planned
expansion of production and research and development facilities and renovation
of existing production facilities via construction lease allowances. The lease
amendment also included the leaseback of $11.0 million of building
improvements on existing facilities sold to the lessor via the lease
amendment. The initial term of the lease expires in May 2014 and, if not
canceled by the Company, will be automatically extended for three five-year
renewal periods and one additional eight-month renewal period. The agreement
requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants. At July 31,
1998, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
In addition to the leases discussed above, the Company leases certain other
facilities and equipment under operating lease agreements. Rent expense under
all operating leases for the years ended July 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, was
$8.6 million, $5.5 million, and $3.5 million, respectively. Future minimum
lease commitments, excluding property taxes, maintenance and insurance, under
leases having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year are as follows
(in thousands) for the fiscal year ending July 31:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1999........................................ $9,304
2000........................................ 16,609
2001........................................ 16,504
2002........................................ 14,500
2003........................................ 13,205
Thereafter.................................. 99,047
---------
$169,169
=========
</TABLE>
NOTE 10-GEOGRAPHIC REPORTING AND CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
The Company operates in one industry sector: the design, development,
manufacture, and marketing of photomask pattern generation equipment for the
semiconductor industry. Etec also provides service and support to its
installed base of systems under warranty obligations and service contracts.
The Company generally markets and distributes its products directly and also
uses sales representatives for certain products in Taiwan and Europe. The
following is a summary of the Company's geographic operations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Japan
United and
States Far East Europe Total
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues to unaffiliated custoemrs
for the year ended:
July 31, 1998 .................. $74,565 $169,677 $44,085 $288,327
========= ========= ========= =========
July 31, 1997 .................. $67,991 $132,268 $40,655 $240,914
========= ========= ========= =========
July 31, 1996 .................. $49,913 $81,553 $14,179 $145,645
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Japan
United and
States Far East Europe Total
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating income (loss) for the
year ended:
July 31, 1998..................... $59,014 $8,109 ($1) $67,122
========= ========= ========= =========
July 31, 1997..................... $45,430 $7,647 ($2,636) $50,441
========= ========= ========= =========
July 31, 1996..................... $15,340 $5,174 $149 $20,663
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Japan
United and
States Far East Europe Total
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Identifiable assets at:
July 31, 1998..................... $312,978 $45,210 $326 $358,514
========= ========= ========= =========
July 31, 1997..................... $243,870 $39,057 $1,616 $284,543
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
Export sales of products shipped from the United States, which are included in
the revenue of the Japan/Far East and Europe segments shown above, were $176.2
million, $138.5 million, and $72.7 million for the years ended July 31, 1998,
1997, and 1996 respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended July 31,
-----------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Customers comprising 10% or more
of the Company's total revenue
for the periods indicated:
A.......................... 7% 16% 8%
B.......................... 17% 6% 13%
C.......................... 6% 14% 17%
</TABLE>
NOTE 11-ACQUISITIONS
Ebetech
In the third quarter of fiscal 1997, the Company's wholly owned subsidiary,
Etec Systems GmbH, acquired substantially all of the assets, properties and
business of Ebetech Electron Beam Technology GmbH ("Ebetech," which was
subsequently renamed "Etec EBT" and is part of the Company's Display Products
Group) from VCB (the Venture Capital Company of Siemens AG), MRS Technology,
Inc. and a group of founding employees in exchange for $4.7 million, net of
cash acquired, and the issuance of a note payable of $0.5 million. The
allocation of the Company's purchase price to tangible and identifiable
intangible assets and liabilities assumed was as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Inventory..................................... $368
Other current assets.......................... 328
Other assets.................................. 674
In-process technology......................... 3,874
Accounts payable and accrued expenses......... (128)
---------
$5,116
=========
</TABLE>
Management's estimate of the value of the in-process technology and the
existing technology was prepared using an income approach methodology that
considered the present value of the cash flows expected to be generated over
the estimated useful life of the technology. Approximately $3.9 million of the
excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired
was allocated to in-process technology acquired and written off in the third
quarter of fiscal 1997 because of the uncertainty as to realization.
Polyscan
In the third quarter of fiscal 1996, Etec Polyscan, Inc. ("Etec Polyscan"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired substantially all of the
assets and assumed certain specified liabilities of Polyscan, Inc.
("Polyscan," which has subsequently become the Company's Interconnect Products
Group) in exchange for 350,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock with an
agreed-upon market value of $3.5 million. The excess of the purchase price
over the fair value of the net assets of $6.3 million was allocated to
in-process technology acquired, which because of the uncertainty as to
realization, the Company wrote off in fiscal 1996.
The purchase price for book purposes was allocated by the Company
approximately as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Inventory..................................... $733
Other current assets.......................... 69
Other assets.................................. 65
In-process technology......................... 6,269
Accounts payable and accrued expenses......... (3,636)
---------
$3,500
=========
</TABLE>
Pro forma results of the acquisitions
The operating results of the acquisitions of Ebetech and Polyscan are included
in the Company's consolidated results of operations from the date of
acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the
consolidated results of operations as if the Ebetech acquisition had occurred
at the beginning of fiscal 1997, after giving effect to certain adjustments.
Additionally, the fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1996 pro forma information excludes
the $3.9 million and $6.3 million write-offs of in-process technology
acquired, respectively. Ebetech results of operations included in the pro
forma presentation for fiscal 1997 are for July 31, 1996 to July 31, 1997; no
pro forma results are presented for comparative purposes for fiscal 1996
because Ebetech did not commence operations until July 31, 1996. Polyscan's
results of operations are included in the pro forma presentation for year
ended July 31, 1996. These pro forma results have been prepared for
comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of what would
have occurred had the acquisitions taken place at the beginning of the periods
presented or of the results that may occur in the future.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended July 31,
-------------------
1997 1996
--------- ---------
(in thousands except
per share data)
<S> <C> <C>
(UNAUDITED)
Net income ........................... $38,171 $42,207
Net income per share-basic............ $1.84 $2.55
Net income per share-diluted.......... $1.73 $2.31
</TABLE>
UNAUDITED QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY JAN. OCT. JULY JAN. OCT.
31, APRIL 30, 31, 31, 31, APRIL 30, 31, 31,
1998 1998 1998 1997 1997 1997 1997 1996
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue................. $87,766 $70,028 $62,168 $68,365 $72,646 $69,701 $53,680 $44,887
Gross profit............ $50,196 $35,750 $33,677 $33,534 $35,804 $34,725 $25,315 $20,783
Income from operatons... $26,284 $15,332 $12,026 $13,480 $18,030 $13,094 $10,910 $8,407
Net income.............. $18,214 $10,674 $8,651 $9,228 $12,263 $7,606 $7,586 $6,984
Net income per share-basic $0.83 $0.49 $0.39 $0.42 $0.57 $0.36 $0.37 $0.35
Net income per share-dilute $0.80 $0.47 $0.38 $0.41 $0.54 $0.34 $0.35 $0.33
</TABLE>
Fiscal 1997 results
o Third quarter fiscal 1997 net income reflects the inclusion of a $1.2
million discrete release of a valuation allowance previously recorded
against deferred tax assets.
o Third quarter fiscal 1997 net income reflects the write-off of in-process
technology acquired of $3.9 million. See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from the
Company's definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the
Company's 1998 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement") within
120 days of fiscal 1998 year end.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
Information relating to Directors required by this section is incorporated by
reference from the information in the section entitled, "Election of
Directors-Nominees" in the Proxy Statement. Information with respect to
executive officers of the Company is contained in the section entitled
"Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I of this Form 10-K, which
information is incorporated by reference into this Part III, Item 10.
Item 405 of Regulation S-K calls for disclosure of any known failure to file
or late filing by an insider to file a report required by Section 16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This disclosure is contained in the section
entitled "Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act" in the Proxy
Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this section is incorporated herein by reference
from the information in the sections entitled "Election of Directors -
Directors' Compensation" and "Executive Compensation" in the Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
The information required by this section is incorporated by reference from the
information in the section entitled "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information required by this section is incorporated by reference from the
information in the section entitled "Certain Transactions" in the Proxy
Statement.
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules,
and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this
report:
1. Financial Statements-See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements at
page 21 of this Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules-All other schedules are omitted because
they are not required, are not applicable, or the information is included in
the financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits-See Index to Exhibits at page 43 of this Form 10-K.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K-No reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1998.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No. Note* Description
- ------- -------- -------------------------------------------------------
2.1 (3) Agreement and Plan of Reorganization among the Registrant,
Etec Polyscan, Inc. Polyscan, Inc. and the shareholders of
Polyscan, Inc. dated January 30, 1996.
2.2 (7) Share Purchase Agreement dated March 13/14, 1997 by and
between Registrant, SXR-2 Vermogensverwaltungsgesellschaft
GmbH, Ebetech Electron-Beam Technology Vertiebs GmbH and
the Selling Shareholders named therein.
3.1 (6) Eighth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.
3.2 (2) Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended.
3.3 (10) Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated
December 2, 1997.
4.1 (1) Series C Shareholders' Rights Agreement by and among the
Registrant and Certain Former Holders of Capital Stock of
ATEQ Corporation and Warrants to Purchase Capital Stock of
ATEQ Corporation dated as of November 8, 1991, as amended
December 1991 and January 14, 1994.
4.2 (3) Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 5, 1996
among the Registrant, Polyscan, Inc. and the stockholders
of Polyscan, Inc.
4.3 (5) Investor Agreement dated June 28, 1996 by and among the
Registrant and Intel Corporation.
4.4 (6) Rights Agreement, dated as of January 15, 1997, by and
between Registrant and Bank of Boston, Rights Agent.
10.1 (1) 1990 Stock Plan of Registrant.
10.2 (1) 1990 Executive Stock Plan of Registrant.
10.3 (1) 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan of Registrant.
10.4 (11) 1995 Omnibus Incentive Plan of Etec Systems, Inc.
10.5 (1) 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Registrant.
10.6 (1) 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan of Registrant.
10.8 (1) Lease Agreement between Beaverton-Redmond Tech Properties
and ATEQ Corporation dated June 18, 1985, as amended May
15, 1987 and September 20, 1989.
10.10 (1),* EBES Information Agreement dated October 1, 1975 between
Western Electric Company, Inc. and Etec, as amended April
1, 1976, August 3, 1976, July 1, 1980, November 22, 1983
and December 20, 1983.
10.11 (1) Consent to Assignment by AT&T to assignment by Perkin-Elmer
to Etec of the EBES Information Agreement dated October 1,
1975 between Western Electric Company, Inc. and Etec.
10.12 (1) Agreement on Officer's Retirement between the Registrant
and John Suzuki dated as of January 25, 1994.
10.13 (1) Form of Indemnity Agreements.
10.15 (4) Amendment Three dated April 3, 1996 to Lease Agreement
dated June 18, 1985 and as amended May 15, 1987 and
September 20, 1989 between Beaverton-Redmond Tech
Properties and the Registrant.
10.17 (4) Credit Agreement among Registrant and the Lenders named
therein and ABN-AMRO Bank, N.V. as agent for Lenders, dated
May 24, 1996.
10.18 (1) Amendment and Assumption Agreement dated May 14, 1992 by
and between the Registrant, SEMATECH, INC. and ATEQ
Corporation.
10.21 (6) Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated January 31,
1997, by and between Registrant and ESI(CA) QRS 12-6, Inc.
10.22 (7) First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated April 23, 1997 by
and between Registrant, the Lenders named therein, and
ABN-AMRO Bank, N.V. amending Credit Agreement dated May 24,
1996.
10.23 (8) Agreement to Purchase Real Property dated May 22, 1997 by
and between Registrant and Royal Neighbors of America.
10.24 (8) Letter Agreement dated as of June 30, 1997 between
Registrant and Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated and ESI (CA) QRS 12-6, Inc.
10.25 (9) Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Registrant and
Standard Insurance Corporation dated August 13, 1997.
10.26 (9) Purchase Agreement by and between Registrant and Comerica
Bank-California dated October 31, 1997.
10.27 (10) Lease Agreement by and between Registrant and Lease Plan
North America and the Participants Named Therein and ABN
Amro N.V. dated December 5, 1997.
10.28 (10) Participation Agreement by and between Etec Systems, Inc.
and Lease Plan North America, Inc. and the Participants
Name Herein and ABN Amro Bank N.V., as Agent for the
Participants dated December 5, 1997
10.29 (10) Amendment dated November 12, 1997 to Purchase and Sale
Agreement by and between Registrant and Standard Insurance
Corporation dated August 13, 1997.
10.30 (11) Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement by and between
ET LLC, a Delaware limited liability company d/b/a ET QRS
LLC as Landlord and Etec Systems, Inc., a Nevada
corporation, as Tenant of the Hayward, California premises
dated February 2, 1998.
10.31 (11) First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Lease
Agreement by and between ET LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company d/b/a ET QRS LLC as Landlord and Etec
Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation, as Tenant of the
Hayward, California premises dated March 31, 1998.
10.32 (11) Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Lease
Agreement by and between ET LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company d/b/a ET QRS LLC as Landlord and Etec
Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation, as Tenant of the
Hayward, California premises dated May 8, 1998.
10.33 (11) Second Amendment to Credit Agreement between Etec Systems,
Inc., each of the financial institutions currently a party
to the Credit Agreement, and ABN Amro Bank N.V.
10.34 (11) 1995 Omnibus Incentive Plan of Etec System, Inc. (As Amended
and Restated Effective December 2, 1997).
10.35 Employment Agreement between Registrant and Stephen E. Cooper
dated December 3, 1992.
10.36 Employment Agreement between Registrant and Trisha Dohren
dated August 8, 1993.
21 List of Subsidiaries
23 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
24 Power of Attorney
27 Financial Data Schedule
- ---------
(1) Incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-1(File No. 33-95648).
(2) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 1996.
(3) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 2.1 and 2.2, respectively,
to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 5, 1996.
(4) Incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (File No. 333-04363).
(5) Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1996.
(6) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 2, 10.2, and 10.1,
respectively, to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended January 31, 1997
(7) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2, respectively,
to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
May 2, 1997.
(8) Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1997.
(9) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 10.1, and 10.2,
respectively, to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 31, 1997.
(10) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 2, 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3,
respectively, to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended January 31, 1998.
(11) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 10.2, 10.1, 10.3, 10.4,
and 10.5, respectively, to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 30, 1998.
* Confidential treatment has been previously granted.
Etec Systems, Inc.
26460 Corporate Avenue
Hayward, CA 94545 USA
(510) 783-9210
Fax (510) 887-2870
December 3, 1992
Stephen E. Cooper
110 Via Novella
Aptos, CA 95003
Dear Steve:
This will confirm our discussions regarding Etec's formal offer of
employment to you.
The following summarizes the provisions of Etec's offer:
Position
Upon confirmation by the Board of Directors of this offer, you will be
appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of Etec. I intend,
however, that you initially concentrate your efforts in the Programs
Directorate, learning the technology and working with key employees of
the Company. This will place both you and I in close personal and
professional contact on a daily basis.
Compensation
Your starting salary will be $6,346.15 biweekly ($165,000 annualized).
In addition to base salary, you will receive a 25% bonus based on
specific evaluation of your performance goals, which will be provided
to you.
Stock
Subject to Board of Directors approval, you will be entitled to 50,000
shares of Etec common stock valued at $.45 per share. Also, you will
receive an option to purchase an additional 50,000 shares of Etec
common stock at $.45 per share, which will vest annually over 3-year
period beginning with your employment date.
Car Allowance
An executive officer, you qualify for a car allowance of $420 per
month.
Termination of Employment
Assuming you do not terminate your employment by your own action, you
will be entitled to six months severance pay if your termination is at
the discretion of the company.
Benefits
You qualify for our standard employee benefits of insurance and our
401(k) Program, details of which are provided under separate cover.
The terms of this offer are subject to Board of Directors approval.
Steve, I believe you will agree that your employment with Etec will
yield excellent professional and personal satisfaction and rewards.
For my part, I believe Etec currently has a solid business with
excellent, exciting opportunities for growth. I truly hope you will
decide in adding your talents to the Etec team.
If you have any questions regarding our offer, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Charles E. Minihan
Charles E. Minihan
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
CEM/atm
Accept: /s/ Stephen E. Cooper Date: 12-28-92
----------------- ---------
ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
BENEFITS SUMMARY
STEPHEN E. COOPER
You qualify for our standard employee benefits which currently consist
of the following:
Medical Insurance: Choice of Indemnity Plan or HMO
Dental Insurance: Choice of Indemnity Plan or HMO or option
to forego dental coverage completely.
Basic Life Insurance: Equivalent to amount of annual salary.
Supplemental Life Ins: Additional insurance of up to 3 times annual
salary.
Income Protection Plan: Monthly payments of 66 2/3% of base earnings
after first 180 days of disability.
Vacation: First calendar year of service - prorata
share of four weeks.
Educational Assist.
Program: Tuition Reimbursement of job-related
courses.
Travel Accident
Insurance: Protection in the event of accidental loss
of life, limb while traveling on company
business. Coverage is five times base
salary.
Savings & Retirement
Plan: You may contribute up to 15% of base pay in
401(k) plan not to exceed the IRS cap
($8,475 for 1992). Company matches 25% of
your contribution, with a cap of 1% of your
base pay.
Employee Assistance
Program: Two personal sessions with professional
care provider. Company pays full cost.
Holidays: Eleven paid holidays a year.
Etec Systems, Inc. INTEROFFICE MEMO
TO:C.E. Minihan DATE: Jan, 15, 1993
FROM: S.E. Cooper
SUBJECT: RELOCATION
Per your request, I am documenting our discussion regarding my
possible future relocation and possible reimbursement by Etec Systems,
Inc.
Today my commute is 70 miles each direction and takes an average
of ninety (90) minutes. This totals fifteen hours per week, depending
on traffic, and could be reduced by more than ten hours with relocation
to the East Bay. As we discussed, it is not economically feasible for
the company to consider relocation at this time.
However, after twelve (12) months at Etec, assuming the Company
is satisfied with my performance and that business improves, I would
like to revesit the issue of relocation and possible reimbursement by
Etec Systems, Inc.
I appreciate your consideration in allowing me to reopen this
issue in January 1994.
Approved: /s/ C.E. Minihan
01/18/93
Etec Systems, Inc.
26460 Corporate Avenue
Hayward, CA 94545 USA
(510) 783-9210
Fax (510) 887-2870
August 8, 1993
Ms. Trisha Dohren
1453 Willow Lake Road
Byron, CA 94514
Dear Ms. Dohren:
Etec Systems, Inc. is pleased to present you with this offer of
employment to be Vice President of Human Resources. The following
summarizes the provisions of Etec's offer:
Position
The position is Vice President of Human Resources with corporate
responsibility for all activities normally covered by the human resource
function. Your responsibilities would include employee relations,
staffing, salary administration, stock administration, employee
benefits, training and development, and employee safety and health. In
addition, you will initially be responsible for security and corporate
facilities. As a member of the Etec corporate staff you will report
directly to Stephen E. Cooper, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Compensation
Your starting salary will be $3076.92 biweekly ($80,000 annualized).
During your first three months of employment you will be responsible for
drafting a performance based key employee bonus plan to be submitted to
the Board of Directors for their approval at their December 7, 1993
meeting. It is intended that you will participate in this plan together
with the other key members of the corporate staff.
Stock
Subject to Board of Directors approval, you will receive an option
through the Employee Stock Option Plan to purchase 20,000 shares of Etec
common stock at $.45 per share, which will vest over a three year period
beginning with your employment date.
Termination of Employment
Should your employment with Etec Systems, Inc. be terminated by the
company for other than cause, you will be entitled to thirteen weeks
(13) salary continuance following the termination date.
Benefits
You qualify for our standard employee benefits of insurance and our 401K
Program, details of which are provided under separate cover. As a Vice
President you will be entitled to four weeks vacation per calendar year
with the first year calculated on a pro rata basis.
Your appointment as a vice president and the terms of your stock offer
are subject to Board of Directors approval and will be addressed at the
September 8, 1993 board meeting.
I believe you will agree that your employment with Etec will provide an
excellent opportunity for both professional and personal satisfaction
and growth. I look forward to your joining the team and helping Etec
become the worldwide leader in providing pattern generation solutions to
the electronics industry.
This offer is valid until August 23, 1993. If you have any questions
regarding this offer, please do not hesitate to contact me. To accept
this offer please return one copy signed and dated.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Steven E. Cooper
Stephen E. Cooper
President and CEO
Accepted: /s/ Trisha Dohren Date: 8/19/93
----------------- ---------
Trisha Dohren
My start date will be: 8/30/93
-------
<PAGE>
Etec Systems, Inc.
Hayward, CA 94545 USA
(510) 783-9210
Fax (510) 887-2870
July 28, 1995
Ms. Trisha Dohren
1453 Willow Lake Road
Byron, CA 94514
Re: Employment Offer Letter dated August 8, 1993
Dear Trisha:
Per our discussion following the offer and acceptance of employment by
Phil Koen, the paragraph Termination of Employment in my letter of
August 8, 1993 is amended to read as follows:
" Should your employment with Etec Systems, Inc. be
terminated by the company for other than cause, you will be
entitled to twenty six (26) weeks salary continuance
following the termination date."
Please acknowledge this correction by signing below and attaching
a copy to the original letter.
Best regards,
/s/ Stephen E. Cooper
Stephen E Cooper
Chairman,
President and CEO
SEC/mhr
Accepted by: /s/ Trisha Dohren 7/28/95
------------- -------
Trisha Dohren Date
EXHIBIT 21
Etec Systems, Inc.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Name State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation
Etec Systems Japan, Ltd Japan
Etec Systems SARL(France) France
Etec Systems GmbH(Germany) Germany
Etec Systems Korea Corp Korea
Etec Systems Ltd. United Kingdom
Etec Systems International inc. Nevada, USA
Etec EBT GmbH(Germany) Germany
Etec Holding GmbH(Germany) Germany
Etec Systems Foreign Sales Corp Barbados
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-33645, 333-00390, 333-00386, 333-00352,
333-00388, and 333-00392) of Etec Systems, Inc. of our report dated August 24,
1998 appearing on page 22 of this Form 10-K.
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
San Jose, California
October 23, 1998
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, on October 16, 1998.
By /s/ William D. Snyder
_____________________________________
William D. Snyder
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and
appoints jointly and severally, Stephen E. Cooper
and William D. Snyder, and each of them, his or her
true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with the
power of substitution, for him in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same,
with exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming
all that each said attorneys-in-fact, or his
substitute, may do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant in the capacities.
/s/ Stephen E. Cooper President, Chief Executive October 16, 1998
- -------------------------- Officer (Principal Executive
Stephen E. Cooper Officer) and Chairman of the
Board.
/s/ William D. Snyder Vice President and Chief October 16, 1998
- -------------------------- Financial Officer (Principal
William D. Snyder Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting
Officer)
/s/ Edward L. Gelbach Director October 16, 1998
- --------------------------
Edward L. Gelbach
William Ryan Director October 16, 1998
- --------------------------
William Ryan
/s/ William T. Siegle Director October 16, 1998
- --------------------------
William T. Siegle
/s/ John McBennett Director October 16, 1998
- --------------------------
John McBennett
/s/ John Suzuki Director October 16, 1998
- --------------------------
John Suzuki
/s/ Thomas Michael TrenDirector October 16, 1998
- --------------------------
Thomas Michael Trent
/s/ Robert L. Wehrli Director October 16, 1998
- --------------------------
Robert L. Wehrli
/s/ W. Russell Wayman
*By -----------------------
Attorney-in-Fact
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000
<S> <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> Jul-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> Aug-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> Jul-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<CASH> 63,600
<SECURITIES> 36,689
<RECEIVABLES> 85,755
<ALLOWANCES> 1,226
<INVENTORY> 86,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 300,554
<PP&E> 72,506
<DEPRECIATION> 23,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 358,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 105,442
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 220
<OTHER-SE> 246,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 358,514
<SALES> 251,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 288,327
<CGS> 106,585
<TOTAL-COSTS> 135,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 53,439 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 765
<INCOME-PRETAX> 70,860
<INCOME-TAX> 24,093
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 46,767
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 46,767
<EPS-PRIMARY> $2.13
<EPS-DILUTED> $2.05
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SG&A AS SG&A IS PART OF 5-03(b)(4).
</FN>
</TABLE>
