<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1999
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-18108
FINET.COM, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
DELAWARE 94-3115180
(State or other (IRS Employer
jurisdiction of Identification
incorporation or No.)
organization)
</TABLE>
2527 Camino Ramon, San Ramon CA 94583
(Address of principal executive offices)
(925) 242-6600
(Registrant's telephone number)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: NONE
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
$.01 PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK Nasdaq
</TABLE>
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/
No. / /
Check if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. / /
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock, as of
June 30, 1999 was 90,312,005.
At that date, the aggregate market value of voting common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing price for the common stock
on Nasdaq was approximately $502,134,748.
Documents incorporated by reference: Items 10 (as to directors), 11, 12, and
13 of Part III incorporate by reference information from the registrant's proxy
statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection
with the solicitation of proxies for the registrant's 1999 annual meeting of
stockholders which is expected to be held on September 30, 1999.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
PART I
Item 1 Description of Business...................................................... 3
Item 2 Description of Property...................................................... 25
Item 3 Legal Proceedings............................................................ 25
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.......................... 26
PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters........ 27
Item 6 Selected Financial Data...................................................... 29
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations................................................................. 30
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.................... 50
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.................................. 51
Item 9 Changes in or Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure................................................................. 84
PART III
Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant........................... 85
Item 11 Executive Compensation....................................................... 85
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management............... 85
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............................... 85
Item 14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.............. 85
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
FINET.COM, INC.
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Readers are cautioned that actual results could differ
materially from those indicated in such statements as a result of certain
factors, including those set forth under "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Factors That May Affect Future
Results" and elsewhere in, or incorporated by reference into, this report.
CORPORATE HISTORY AND NEW MANAGEMENT
CORPORATE HISTORY
We were incorporated in 1989 to pursue a line of business unrelated to our
current business. We acquired Finex Corporation, a private technology-oriented
mortgage broker and discontinued our unrelated lines of business in 1990. In
December 1996, we acquired Monument Mortgage, a technology-oriented private
mortgage banking company, and since then, have made several additional
acquisitions to expand our technology and broaden our services. In April 1998,
we acquired Coastal Federal Mortgage Company, a sub-prime mortgage banker with
lending offices in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Florida, and, in May 1998, we
acquired Mical Mortgage, a mortgage banker with offices in San Diego and Las
Vegas that specialized in the origination of FHA and VA loans. As a result of
operational and loan underwriting problems discovered after these acquisitions,
we discontinued our Coastal and Mical business units in April 1999. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and "Factors That May Affect Future Performance"--We may incur
additional losses from the discontinued businesses of Coastal Federal Mortgage
and Mical Mortgage.
We currently operate our mortgage businesses through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Monument Mortgage.
NEW MANAGEMENT
We believe that a strong, talented and experienced management team is
critical to our success. Accordingly, since October 1998, we have reshaped our
management by hiring a new president and Chief Executive Officer, Mark Korell,
and a new executive team. Our new executive team includes individuals with
experience in mortgage banking, Internet technology, financial management, sales
and marketing and secondary mortgage market transactions. In addition to Mark
Korell, our executive management team now includes: Michael Conway as our
Executive Vice President--Capital Markets, Gary Palmer as our Executive Vice
President--Chief Financial Officer, Kevin Gillespie as our Executive Vice
President--Sales and Marketing, Thomas Porter as our Executive Vice President--
Administration, and Chris Skeadas as our Executive Vice President--Chief
Technology Officer. Our new management has discontinued the operations of
several unprofitable acquisitions made by prior management and has focused on
expanding the on-line mortgage origination business.
BUSINESS
FINET.COM
FiNet.com is a full service, on-line mortgage banker that offers an
easy-to-use, one-stop mortgage source for consumers and mortgage brokers. We
operate one of the first sites on the Internet that enables the consumer to
apply for and receive credit approval on-line, and to electronically search,
3
<PAGE>
analyze and select from a wide variety of mortgage loan products and rates
offered by us and other lenders. We make the mortgage process easier and more
understandable, while maintaining quality service by controlling the consumer's
entire mortgage lending experience. We also provide on-line and e-commerce
technologies and loan process management tools to mortgage broker businesses to
enable them to compete more effectively with on-line and other national lenders
and brokers and help their customers make better informed borrowing decisions.
We generate revenues by providing services to two primary customer groups:
consumers and mortgage broker businesses. We market or intend to market our
mortgage services to consumers primarily through:
- branded arrangements, where our services are offered through rapidly
growing websites such as XOOM.com and Ask.com, using our Interloan.com
brand;
- co-branded arrangements, where our services are offered through specialty
real estate websites such as Homeseekers.com and Homehunter.com, using
both our brand and our partner's brand; and
- private label arrangements, where we plan to design and operate electronic
mortgage centers for third party websites using our partner's brand.
We provide our consumers with a fast and easy to use on-line method to get
their loans approved through our award-winning iQualify.com technology.
Consumers can then use our Interloan.com website technology to search, analyze
and select from a wide variety of mortgage loan products and rates offered by
leading lenders, including our Monument Mortgage subsidiary. We allow each
consumer to choose between automated service and personalized assistance at any
time in the loan process. Consumers are assisted by our mortgage professionals
throughout the loan application process. We recently began offering our
consumers additional choices by allowing them to submit their processed mortgage
loan applications for auction to interested lenders. We refer to these services
to consumers as our business-to-consumer channel.
We offer mortgage broker businesses the opportunity to use the on-line
technology and automated underwriting systems of our full service mortgage
banking operation to expand and improve service to their local customers and
compete with on-line mortgage originators, while maintaining the flexibility to
control their own businesses. As a full service mortgage banker, we fund loans
originated by mortgage brokers, which we then sell to institutional investors in
the secondary mortgage market. We also plan to design private label websites for
mortgage broker businesses that will emphasize user-friendly access to on-line,
automated underwriting systems and other e-commerce services. We refer to these
services to mortgage brokers as our business-to-business channel.
During fiscal 1999, we originated and/or funded over $1.3 billion in
mortgage loans directly or through our mortgage broker customers, including
approximately $484 million which we originated using on-line technology as part
of the loan process. During our most recent fiscal quarter ended April 30, 1999,
on-line loan technology was used in 52% of our business-to-consumer loan
originations and 59% of our business-to-business loan originations. In our
business-to-consumer channel, we earn our revenues from origination points and
fees charged to consumers. In our business-to-business channel, we primarily
earn revenues from the sale of loans and related servicing rights in the
secondary mortgage market.
We offer a full range of loan products, including fixed and adjustable rate
first mortgage loans with a variety of maturities, conforming loans (loans that
meet the purchase standards of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac), jumbo loans (loans
that meet those standards except they exceed the maximum loan amount), and loans
to borrowers who do not meet one or more of the other credit or documentation
standards of the government-sponsored mortgage programs.
4
<PAGE>
Since October 1998, we have reshaped our management by hiring a new
president and Chief Executive Officer , Mark Korell, formerly the chief
executive officerfor Norwest Mortgage, Inc., and a new executive team. Our new
executive team includes individuals with experience in mortgage banking,
Internet technology, financial management, sales and marketing and secondary
mortgage market transactions. Under our new management, we have discontinued the
operations of several unprofitable acquisitions made by prior management and
have focused on expanding our on-line mortgage origination business.
THE UNITED STATES MORTGAGE MARKET
The United States residential mortgage market is a substantial and growing
part of the U.S. economy. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association,
outstanding consumer mortgage debt exceeded $4.3 trillion at the end of 1998.
Loan origination volume in the U.S. reached a record high of $1.5 trillion in
1998, compared to $834 billion in 1997. The residential mortgage market is
fragmented, with the largest mortgage lender, Norwest Mortgage, accounting for
only 7.7% of funded loans in 1998.
Consumers generally seek mortgage loans to finance a home purchase or to
refinance existing mortgage debt. In some cases, a borrower may refinance for
more than the existing mortgage amount and use the cash generated for other
purposes. Mortgage loans are originated through two primary lending channels,
frequently referred to as retail and wholesale. These terms correspond to our
business-to-consumer and business-to-business channels. Traditional retail
originators generate loans through direct contact with the consumer. Retail
originators work through local branch offices or telemarketing centers.
Wholesale originators pay loan origination fees to mortgage brokers or purchase
closed loans from other lenders, who, in either case, work directly with
consumers from local offices.
Typically, the traditional mortgage loan process involves the following
steps:
- meeting with lender or broker to complete the lengthy paper application;
- gathering extensive supporting documentation for the application;
- entering the application information/data into the broker's or lender's
processing system;
- ordering appraisals, title and credit reports and verifying deposit and
other factual matters;
- submitting the paper loan file to an underwriter to determine loan
eligibility;
- receiving conditions to approval of loan by the underwriter;
- collecting additional information and complying with the conditions;
- resubmitting the revised paper file for approval;
- preparing loan documents and closing instructions;
- reviewing and approving the loan for funding; and
- closing of the transaction.
This paper intensive process generally takes at least three weeks to
complete.
CONSUMERS
The traditional mortgage loan application and closing process described
above is complex, time-consuming, paper-intensive and costly. We believe that
this process causes many consumers to feel:
- uncertain that lenders and brokers are providing unbiased advice and
recommending the most suitable mortgage products;
5
<PAGE>
- skeptical that rates initially quoted will ultimately be available;
- intimidated by the number and variety of mortgage products available;
- pressured to commit to a particular mortgage product before they have
researched and compared alternative products to their satisfaction;
- aggravated by the amount and types of loan fees they are required to pay;
and
- frustrated by the substantial time and effort that it takes to complete a
mortgage loan.
MORTGAGE BROKER BUSINESSES
In 1998, approximately 70% of all mortgages in the United States were
originated through mortgage brokers. The mortgage broker industry is highly
fragmented with approximately 36,000 mortgage broker businesses operating in the
United States according to Wholesale Access. Mortgage broker businesses are
typically small, local enterprises that increasingly lack the financial
resources and technological capability to compete with financially stronger and
better-organized mortgage lenders, including on-line mortgage originators. In
particular, they generally lack access to the technology necessary to determine
borrower eligibility quickly and to search and analyze available mortgage
products to find the best match for their customers. Because local practices and
customs in the mortgage industry vary significantly from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction, and many consumers will continue to prefer face-to-face local
contact, we believe that nationwide lenders will not be able to meet the needs
of local mortgage consumers. Mortgage brokers will thus continue to be an
integral and important part of the mortgage lending process for the foreseeable
future. However, as technological advances make it easier for consumers to deal
directly with lenders, we believe that mortgage brokers will need to find new
ways to compete more effectively for the consumers' business.
ON-LINE MORTGAGE ORIGINATION
With the advent of on-line and e-commerce technologies, loan originations
can be made electronically, resulting in cost and time savings to consumers and
the mortgage brokers who assist those consumers. Although the on-line mortgage
industry is still relatively new, it is expected to grow rapidly. According to
Forrester Research, the market for on-line mortgage originations is expected to
grow from an estimated $18.7 billion in 1999 to over $91.2 billion in 2003,
representing an increase in on-line mortgage originations from 1.5% of the
existing market in 1999 to 9.6% of the projected market in 2003.
THE FINET.COM SOLUTION
We are a pioneer in offering on-line mortgage services to consumers and
mortgage broker businesses. The FiNet.com solution focuses on both consumers and
the mortgage brokers who assist many consumers in the mortgage loan process. We
believe that by using on-line and e-commerce technologies to streamline and
automate the process of making residential mortgage loans, we can help consumers
and mortgage broker businesses save time and money, and improve access to
mortgage credit. We also believe that we can help mortgage brokers expand their
business and withstand the competitive threat posed by on-line lenders.
The FiNet.com solution provides the following key advantages in our
business-to-consumer channel:
- CONVENIENCE AND SERVICE. We provide our consumers with a fast and
easy-to-use on-line method to get a mortgage loan approved using our
award-winning iQualify.com technology. By clicking on our Interloan.com
website, consumers can easily and efficiently search, analyze and compare
mortgage products and rates, and make loan decisions based on their
personal financial situation
6
<PAGE>
and needs. In addition, our customers are able to choose either an
automated process to complete their mortgage transaction or, at any point,
choose to receive the personalized assistance of a mortgage professional.
We aim to make our fees and costs competitive with other on-line mortgage
originators, who typically charge .625% for conforming loan products.
- UNBIASED ADVICE WITH NO SALES PRESSURE. Because our mortgage lending
process is automated, the consumer will not feel pressured to commit to
any particular mortgage product or lender. In addition, by having the
ability to search, compare and analyze different mortgage products and
rates without having to consult with a mortgage broker or lender, the
consumer will not be susceptible to receiving biased advice from the
mortgage broker or lender. We also give the consumer the ability to lock
in an interest rate when the application is approved, assuring the
consumer that the rate initially quoted will be available at closing.
- WIDE CHOICE OF MORTGAGE LENDERS AND MORTGAGE LOANS. Through Interloan.com
we provide consumers with a wide choice of mortgage products and rates
offered by Monument Mortgage and by more than 50 additional lenders
nationwide. In addition, we offer the consumer the ability to submit their
processed mortgage applications for bid by lenders in the auction process.
We continuously review the mortgage products and rates offered by other
lenders in order to select new mortgage products to provide our on-line
consumers.
The FiNet.com solution provides the following key advantages in our
business-to-business channel:
- EMPOWERING BROKERS WITH TECHNOLOGY. We help mortgage brokers reduce the
cost of their mortgage originations by supplying them with on-line and
e-commerce technologies and loan processing management tools. We believe
that on-line and e-commerce technologies can enable traditional mortgage
brokers to compete more effectively in their local markets with new
on-line mortgage originators and large retail loan originators. We enable
our business-to-business channel customers to provide the benefits of
automated, on-line mortgage services to their local customers while
maintaining personal contact with and controlling the customer
relationship. We are also developing private label websites for our
business-to-business customers. Our private label website services will
enable mortgage broker businesses to send their customers to a FiNet.com
website displaying that broker's name. The website will offer a full range
of mortgage products provided by our Monument Mortgage subsidiary and
other lenders. By using their own name and mortgage professionals through
this private label service, mortgage broker businesses will be able to
match the product offerings of on-line loan mortgage originators.
- OFFERING BROKERS CHOICE AND ASSISTANCE. As a full service mortgage banker,
we provide our business-to-business channel customers the ability to place
a loan with us either electronically or in the traditional paper format.
We believe that our on-line underwriting services provide exceptional
value to our business-to-business channel customers by greatly reducing
the time it takes to determine customer loan eligibility. Our
business-to-business channel customers have access to a range of on-line
underwriting software, including Fannie Mae's Desktop Underwriter and
Freddie Mac's Loan Prospector for loans that conform to the guidelines of
these agencies, as well as to GMAC/RFC's AssetWise and GE Capital
Mortgage's Good Decisions for loans that do not conform to agency
guidelines.
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
We intend to implement our business strategy by offering fully-automated
on-line mortgage services to consumers through Interloan.com and to mortgage
broker businesses through Monument Mortgage. We believe that our on-line
mortgage services offer distinct advantages over the traditional loan process
which is paper intensive, slow and cumbersome.
7
<PAGE>
INTERLOAN.COM
Through our Interloan.com website, consumers can fill out an on-line loan
application and request an automated underwriting analysis of their application.
The Interloan.com process requires the borrower to complete an application which
consists of only 32 fields, in contrast to the extensive, multi-page traditional
paper mortgage application. Our iQualify.com technology electronically obtains a
credit report on the borrower, combines and reformats the credit and application
information and submits the information through Monument Mortgage to an
automated underwriting system for a comprehensive credit analysis. If the system
returns an "approved" status, the consumer can be confident that a lender will
make the consumer a mortgage loan on the terms submitted, subject to
verification of the information provided by the customer. We have utilized
Fannie Mae's Desktop Underwriter system extensively in our mortgage lending
activities.
We are developing interfaces from Interloan.com to other automated
underwriting systems from Freddie Mac (Loan Prospector), GMAC/RFC (AssetWise)
and GE Capital Mortgage (Good Decisions) to increase the number and type of
loans processed by us that receive an automated approval, including jumbo loans
which have loan amounts greater than the $240,000 Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac limit,
and so-called Alternative A mortgage loans and sub-prime loans, which are loans
to borrowers with credit histories unacceptable for one or more reasons to
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We believe that approximately 80% of consumers
seeking loans are eligible to get their applications approved in our fully
automated process. Approximately 56% of our closed loans during fiscal 1999 were
approved on-line.
After receiving automated underwriting approval, the consumer will be able
to select from and compare multiple loan options offered by Interloan.com.
Consumers will be able to choose from loan products offered by more than 50
lenders nationwide and many comparable products offered through Monument
Mortgage, or they will be able to submit their loans for auction to interested
lenders.
Interloan.com also offers consumers the option to exit the fully automated
process and continue to complete the loan process with the personal assistance
of mortgage professionals. In many cases, the mortgage professionals use our
on-line tools to assist those consumers whose applications fall outside the
parameters of the fully-automated process. These consumers include borrowers who
are self-employed or have credit problems, or who are purchasing investment
property. In addition, if the automated underwriting system is unable to approve
an application, the consumer is provided with a detailed and understandable list
of the reasons why the mortgage application was not approved, which is intended
to facilitate re-application.
MONUMENT MORTGAGE
Although a mortgage broker is generally more familiar with the mortgage
lending process, the broker must still contend with many time consuming and
paper-intensive tasks involved in the mortgage lending process. To assist the
mortgage broker, we provide the mortgage broker with access to our automated,
on-line mortgage approval process. A mortgage broker can access our services
either through the submission of traditional paper files to our loan processors
or electronically through automated underwriting software. In either case, we
use our automated technology to process the mortgage broker's loan application
quickly and efficiently. We are developing an on-line monitoring system that
will enable the mortgage broker to monitor in real time the status of loans
submitted to us.
We are also currently developing private label websites incorporating our
iQualify.com technology that will provide mortgage broker businesses with the
benefits of the latest e-commerce technologies based on the specific needs of
the mortgage broker. We believe that this will enable mortgage broker businesses
to offer competitive on-line mortgage origination services to their local
customers. By providing these on-line services to mortgage broker businesses, we
believe that we will be able to increase the number of loans that these mortgage
broker businesses place with us through Monument Mortgage.
8
<PAGE>
TECHNOLOGY
We are building our technology systems by combining our own proprietary
technologies with the commercially licensed Internet technologies such as:
- GHR Systems' PremierWare software components for pricing, product searches
and analysis;
- Tuttle & Co.'s LockPoint Xtra for interest rate risk management; and
- GMAC/RFC's RFConnects for warehouse line management.
SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS
Through our proprietary iQualify.com we are directly linked to the
underwriting systems of the investors who will eventually purchase the closed
loans from us. Therefore, any loan which is approved through iQualify.com is
also approved by the investor who will ultimately purchase it from us.
iQualify.com also tracks mortgage rates and e-mails consumers when their target
rate has been reached.
We are configuring our commercially licensed software to:
- search qualifying product information from more than 50 lenders following
approval;
- provide the correct pricing for the combination of mortgage features
selected;
- perform a variety of mortgage-related computations, such as maximum
affordable sale price, minimum required cash, specified cash investment
and specified monthly payment computations;
- complete a "checklist document" based on the requirements of specific
transactions;
- access an independently maintained, comprehensive closing cost database of
fees for all 50 states on a county-by-county basis; and
- provide automated tracking status of a loan, or loans in the case of our
mortgage broker business customers, through the lending process.
PRIVATE LABEL TEMPLATES
We are currently developing a template system that will allow us to the
develop and deploy a customized private-label website quickly and easily. These
websites can have all the functionality of our Interloan.com website, with a
unique brand and appearance for each private-label partner.
NEW IMPLEMENTATION OF LOAN PROSPECTOR
We are one of the lenders selected by Freddie Mac to pilot a new version of
its Loan Prospector automated underwriting system with mortgage broker
businesses. We intend to be a significant "sponsoring lender" in the use of the
new Internet-based Loan Prospector technology by mortgage broker businesses.
SERVER HOSTING AND BACK-UP
Our website's hardware systems are housed at our facilities in Walnut Creek,
California, where we have redundant power back-up and redundant communications
lines. Our routers are configured for load balancing and fault tolerance. We
have a strict maintenance schedule for our hardware and are not required to take
our website off-line to perform scheduled maintenance.
9
<PAGE>
SECURITY
Through a Linux firewall we are able to maintain the integrity of our system
by blocking unauthorized traffic. The firewall is accessible only via the
console which is housed in a secure cage at our facility. In addition, all
sensitive transmissions between the client and server are encrypted.
MARKETING
We intend to selectively pursue strategic alliances and business
partnerships in order to leverage our current market position, increase our
on-line visibility and accelerate distribution of our services. In addition to
the marketing strategies described below, we anticipate making large general
advertising expenditures to promote our brand name.
BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER CHANNEL
In our business-to-consumer channel, we intend to market our services
through branding arrangements with high-traffic general interest websites,
co-branding arrangements with specialty real estate and financial websites, and
private label arrangements.
Our primary marketing strategy is to become affiliated with general interest
websites where we will be the preferred mortgage provider for their repeat
customer base. We have entered into marketing arrangements with the following
websites:
- XOOM.COM. We entered into a strategic marketing alliance agreement with
XOOM.com in April 1999. Under the XOOM.com agreement, we have a fixed
button on XOOM.com's homepage and we have a premier position within the
real-estate/mortgages section of XOOM.com's Shopping Guide area.
- ASKJEEVES. AskJeeves is a leading provider of questions and answer based
searches for Internet products and services. We entered into a marketing
agreement with Ask.com in April 1999. Under the terms of the agreement, we
own certain words and when they are used in a question by a user, an
Interloan.com banner will appear along with a hyperlink to our website.
For these keyword searches, we have the exclusive rights to the "Shop"
button.
We also target websites catering to homebuyers and real estate agents. We
have entered into partnering agreements, which include operating a mortgage or
finance center, with the following real estate related websites:
- HOMESEEKERS.COM. We entered into a marketing agreement with Homeseekers in
April 1999. Under our agreement with Homeseekers, we are the exclusive
operator of the Homeseekers Finance Center.
- HOMEHUNTER.COM. Homehunter.com is the official real estate website for
Classified Ventures, a consortium of newspaper publishers. We entered into
an exclusive marketing agreement with Homehunter.com in February 1999 to
create and operate an electronic finance center, which can be accessed
through Homeseekers.com public site, Homeseekers.com/citynet private
realtor site and Realty 2000 real estate agent productivity software.
- COXINTERACTIVE MEDIA. CoxInteractive Media is the Internet division of Cox
Communications and is comprised of local portals in 15 cities in the
United States. In May 1999, we entered into an agreement with
CoxInteractive Media that gives us the exclusive sponsorship of a mortgage
center, exclusive rights to certain mortgage related key word search
terms, and a fixed position on several real estate related web pages.
In private label arrangements, we will create websites to prominently
display our partner's name and logo with a unique appearance and operate the
websites.
10
<PAGE>
BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS CHANNEL
We intend to increase our brand awareness with mortgage broker businesses
by:
- building a strong in-house sales force to market our services by personal
contact and to assist mortgage brokers in adopting on-line technologies;
- traditional marketing strategies, including participation in trade shows
and conferences, advertising in industry publications, flyers and broker
loyalty programs; and
- introducing new Internet-oriented services.
Key elements of our business-to-business channel marketing strategy will be
to offer co-branded or private-label sites operated by mortgage broker
businesses and to build a strong in-house sales force.
MORTGAGE OPERATIONS
While we currently make loans primarily in California, we are licensed to
originate mortgage loans in 29 other states and the District of Columbia. We
have entered into a partnering arrangement with a nationwide mortgage lender to
provide for mortgage lending services in the states which we are not currently
licensed. Through this arrangement we are currently able to provide mortgage
services in all 50 states. We intend to become licensed in all states where we
are not currently licensed and expect that the proportion of loans we make
outside of California will increase.
LOAN PRODUCT TYPES
Interloan.com offers consumers a variety of new and traditional mortgage
products through its nationwide network of lenders, which includes our Monument
Mortgage subsidiary. Monument Mortgage offers consumers and mortgage broker
businesses a wide array of first mortgage products, including 15 and 30-year
fixed rate loans, balloon loans and adjustable rate loans. Monument Mortgage
also offers second mortgages and home equity lines of credit. The following is a
description of the types of mortgage loans currently offered by Monument
Mortgage.
CONFORMING MORTGAGE LOANS
Conforming mortgage loans are mortgage loans that conform to the
underwriting standards established by one of the government-sponsored mortgage
entities, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, and are originated and generally sold by us
directly to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
JUMBO MORTGAGE LOANS
Jumbo mortgage loans do not satisfy the criteria to be conforming loans
solely because they exceed the maximum loan size, currently $240,000 for
single-family homes. We sell all the jumbo mortgage loans we originate to
institutional investors or privately sponsored mortgage conduits such as GE
Capital Mortgage and GMAC/RFC, among others.
ALTERNATIVE A MORTGAGE LOANS
Alternative A mortgage loans fail to satisfy one or more elements of the
jumbo or Fannie Mae/ Freddie Mac loan underwriting criteria, such as those
relating to documentation, employment history, income verification,
loan-to-value ratios, credit history, qualifying ratios or borrower net worth.
We originate mortgage loans that do not satisfy one or more of the underwriting
criteria but which, in our estimation, based primarily on the borrower's credit
score and loan-to-value ratios for the property, present a risk profile
comparable to conforming loans. We generally sell these loans to GMAC/RFC and
IndyMac.
11
<PAGE>
HOME EQUITY AND SECOND MORTGAGE LOANS
Home equity and second mortgage loans are secured by second liens on the
related property. Home equity mortgage loans take the form of a line of credit
while second mortgage loans are "closed-end" loans. Both types of loans are
designed primarily for high credit quality borrowers and are underwritten
according to the standards of the investor to which the loans will be sold. Home
equity lines generally provide for either a 5-year or 15-year draw period,
during which the borrower may make cash withdrawals, and a 10-year repayment
period during which the amount outstanding at the end of the draw period is
amortized. Only interest payments are made during the draw period. Second
mortgage loans are "closed-end," that is they are fixed in amount at the time of
origination and typically amortize over the term of the loan or have a balloon
payment feature. Home equity lines generally bear adjustable interest rates
while second mortgage loans typically bear fixed interest rates. Both types of
loans are frequently originated in conjunction with our origination of a
first-lien mortgage loan on the related property. We generally sell these loans
to Homecomings, a GMAC/RFC subsidiary.
SUB-PRIME MORTGAGE LOANS
This category consists of mortgage loans for borrowers who have impaired or
limited credit profiles or higher debt-to-income ratios than would be acceptable
for sale of such loans to one of the agencies or private-sponsored mortgage
conduits. Such mortgage loans may also fail to satisfy the underwriting criteria
of the government-sponsored entities in other ways. We categorize these mortgage
loans based on the borrower's credit profile as "A-" or "B" or loans which are
generally considered "non-prime" mortgage loans in the secondary mortgage
market. We do not originate mortgage loans that our automated underwriting
system would categorize as "C" or "D" loans. We currently sell the "A-" or "B"
loans we originate to investors such as GMAC/RFC.
12
<PAGE>
LOAN ORIGINATION
The following table summarizes our originations for the categories of
mortgage loans by type in the periods indicated for our ongoing businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
-------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CONFORMING MORTGAGE LOANS
Number of loans...................................................................... 1,903 2,530 4,660
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 247.8 $ 359.6 $ 705.6
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 84%
% of total loan volume............................................................... 72% 70% 75%
JUMBO MORTGAGE LOANS
Number of loans...................................................................... 183 164 415
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 55.9 $ 52.7 $ 148.7
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 51%
% of total loan volume............................................................... 16% 10% 16%
ALTERNATIVE A MORTGAGE LOANS
Number of loans...................................................................... 203 340 279
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 33.2 $ 69.2 $ 55.0
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 100%
% of total loan volume............................................................... 10% 13% 6%
HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE LOANS
Number of loans...................................................................... 297 412 311
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 10.5 $ 15.3 $ 11.8
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 100%
% of total loan volume............................................................... 3% 3% 1%
SUB-PRIME MORTGAGE LOANS
Number of loans...................................................................... 32 128 104
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 4.2 $ 19.3 $ 17.2
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 100%
% of total loan volume............................................................... 1% 4% 2%
FHA/VA
Number of loans...................................................................... 6 2 4
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 0.6 $ 0.3 $ 0.5
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 100%
% of total loan volume............................................................... * * *
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Less than one percent
13
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes originations for the categories of mortgage
loans by type in the periods indicated for our discontinued businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
-------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CONFORMING MORTGAGE LOANS
Number of loans....................................................................... -- -- 551
Volume (in millions of dollars)....................................................... -- -- $ 63.5
% of category volume we funded........................................................ -- -- 100%
% of total loan volume................................................................ -- -- 16%
SUB-PRIME MORTGAGE LOANS
Number of loans....................................................................... 500 1,335 801
Volume (in millions of dollars)....................................................... $ 35.4 $ 93.4 $ 64.7
% of category volume we funded........................................................ 100% 100% 100%
% of total loan volume................................................................ 100% 100% 17%
FHA/VA
Number of loans....................................................................... -- -- 2,702
Volume (in millions of dollars)....................................................... -- -- $ 260.1
% of category volume we funded........................................................ -- -- 100%
% of total loan volume................................................................ -- -- 67%
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes our originations of mortgage loans by purpose
in the periods indicated for our ongoing businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
-------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PURCHASE
Number of loans...................................................................... 1,171 1,080 1,405
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 180.4 $ 167.7 $ 233.2
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 90%
% of total loan volume............................................................... 51% 32% 25%
REFINANCING
Number of loans...................................................................... 1,126 2,010 4,018
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 160.6 $ 330.4 $ 691.6
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 76%
% of total loan volume............................................................... 46% 64% 74%
HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE LOANS
Number of loans...................................................................... 327 486 380
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 11.2 $ 18.3 $ 14.0
% of category volume we funded....................................................... 100% 100% 99%
% of total loan volume............................................................... 3% 4% 1%
</TABLE>
14
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes our originations of mortgage loans by purpose
in the periods indicated for our discontinued businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
-------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PURCHASE
Number of loans........................................................................ 182 463 1,725
Volume (in millions of dollars)........................................................ $ 10.1 $ 27.1 $ 165.0
% of category volume we funded......................................................... 100% 100% 100%
% of total loan volume................................................................. 29% 29% 42%
REFINANCING
Number of Loans........................................................................ 318 872 2,329
Volume (in millions of dollars)........................................................ $ 25.3 $ 66.3 $ 223.3
% of category volume we funded......................................................... 100% 100% 100%
% of total loan volume................................................................. 71% 71% 58%
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Less than one percent
The following table summarizes our originations of mortgage loans by channel
in the periods indicated for our ongoing businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
-------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CONSUMER CHANNEL
ON-LINE
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... -- -- $ 151.3
% of total loan volume............................................................... -- -- 16%
TRADITIONAL
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 13.5 $ 24.7 $ 114.0
% of total loan volume............................................................... 4% 5% 12%
BUSINESS CHANNEL
ON-LINE
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 1.3 $ 139.4 $ 332.4
% of total loan volume............................................................... * 27% 36%
TRADITIONAL
Volume (in millions of dollars)...................................................... $ 337.4 $ 352.3 $ 341.1
% of total loan volume............................................................... 96% 68% 36%
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Less than one percent
15
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes our originations of mortgage loans by channel
in the periods indicated for our discontinued businesses. Our discontinued
businesses made no on-line originations in the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
-------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CONSUMER CHANNEL
TRADITIONAL
Volume (in millions of dollars)........................................................ -- $ 9.1 $ 49.8
% of total loan volume................................................................. -- 10% 13%
BUSINESS CHANNEL
TRADITIONAL
Volume (in millions of dollars)........................................................ $ 35.4 $ 84.3 $ 338.5
% of total loan volume................................................................. 100% 90% 87%
</TABLE>
GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION
The following table summarizes our loan originations by state in the periods
indicated for our ongoing businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
---------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CALIFORNIA
Number of loans................................................................... 1,846 2,826 4,856
Volume (in millions of dollars)................................................... $ 264.2 $ 428.1 $ 820.7
% of total loan volume............................................................ 75% 83% 87%
WASHINGTON
Number of loans................................................................... 147 46 211
Volume (in millions of dollars)................................................... $ 18.3 $ 5.9 $ 26.1
% of total loan volume............................................................ 5% 1% 3%
COLORADO
Number of loans................................................................... 136 231 319
Volume (in millions of dollars)................................................... $ 17.5 $ 28.0 $ 42.5
% of total loan volume............................................................ 5% 5% 5%
OREGON
Number of loans................................................................... 146 213 139
Volume (in millions of dollars)................................................... $ 14.2 $ 23.3 $ 18.1
% of total loan volume............................................................ 4% 5% 2%
NEVADA
Number of loans................................................................... 119 83 22
Volume (in millions of dollars)................................................... $ 14.0 $ 10.1 $ 4.1
% of total loan volume............................................................ 4% 2% *
ALL OTHER STATES
Number of loans................................................................... 230 177 256
Volume (in millions of dollars)................................................... $ 24.0 $ 21.0 $ 27.3
% of total loan volume............................................................ 7% 4% 3%
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Less than one percent
16
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes our originations of mortgage loans by state
in the periods indicated for our discontinued businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
-----------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- ------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CALIFORNIA
Number of loans.................................................................... -- -- 1,261
Volume (in millions of dollars).................................................... -- -- $ 142.2
% of total loan volume............................................................. -- -- 36%
GEORGIA
Number of loans.................................................................... -- -- 474
Volume (in millions of dollars).................................................... -- -- $ 45.6
% of total loan volume............................................................. -- -- 12%
FLORIDA
Number of loans.................................................................... 80 210 388
Volume (in millions of dollars).................................................... $ 4.7 $ 14.5 $ 33.8
% of total loan volume............................................................. 13% 16% 9%
NEVADA
Number of loans.................................................................... -- -- 299
Volume (in millions of dollars).................................................... -- -- $ 39.0
% of total loan volume............................................................. -- -- 10%
PENNSYLVANIA
Number of loans.................................................................... 114 360 228
Volume (in millions of dollars).................................................... $ 6.3 $ 20.5 $ 14.5
% of total loan volume............................................................. 18% 22% 4%
NEW JERSEY
Number of loans.................................................................... 123 275 145
Volume (in millions of dollars).................................................... $ 10.0 $ 23.3 $ 13.0
% of total loan volume............................................................. 28% 25% 3%
ALL OTHER STATES
Number of loans.................................................................... 183 490 1,259
Volume (in millions of dollars).................................................... $ 14.4 $ 35.1 $ 100.2
% of total loan volume............................................................. 41% 37% 26%
</TABLE>
UNDERWRITING
If a consumer using Interloan.com chooses to have a loan funded and closed
by a lender other than Monument Mortgage, that lender is responsible for
underwriting the loan and may choose to re-underwrite the loan. If a consumer
chooses to have a loan funded and closed by Monument Mortgage, we continue using
the streamlined underwriting process by accepting the consumer's automated
underwriting results. Because we do not hold mortgage loans for investment, we
underwrite each mortgage loan to criteria provided by the investor we expect to
purchase the loan. By using automated underwriting systems accepted by our
investors, we reduce the risk of an investor rejecting the loan for underwriting
reasons.
Mortgage investors' underwriting criteria generally include such items as
the borrower's mortgage, installment loan payments and credit history,
employment history, capacity to pay, outstanding judgments, charge-offs and
repossessions involving the borrower, and involvement in bankruptcies by the
borrower and foreclosures. Since loans are secured by a mortgage lien, an
appraisal of the property securing the loan is also required.
17
<PAGE>
To maintain the integrity of the underwriting process, we do not permit our
loan production personnel, including loan originators and Internet service
representatives, to underwrite the mortgage loans which they originate. All
underwriting reviews and decisions for loans underwritten by us are conducted by
separate underwriters who have no other involvement with the loans.
COMPLIANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
COMPLIANCE
Our legal/compliance team is responsible for compliance and licensing. This
centralized compliance function allows us to control and supervise regulatory
compliance and offer consistency to our customers. Additionally, the compliance
group develops loan documents for new products and maintains lending and broker
licenses.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Prior to funding a loan, we perform a pre-closing audit to ensure the loan
meets investor requirements. The pre-closing audit includes the following items:
- a new credit report is obtained;
- a cross reference check is performed to determine if the borrower or
property has been previously submitted for a loan;
- a verbal verification of current employment is completed; and
- for most self-employed borrowers, the IRS is contacted to confirm annual
income.
QUALITY CONTROL
Our quality control personnel continuously sample closed loans to verify
their compliance with legal documentation requirements and for accuracy and
potential fraud. These quality control reviews enable us to monitor, evaluate
and improve the overall quality of loan production and to identify and
communicate to the legal/compliance team and management existing and potential
underwriting problems.
We currently utilize the services of an independent quality control
provider. Each month our quality control provider reviews a random 10% sample of
loans funded by us. The review includes:
- a credit underwriting review;
- a complete loan package re-verification;
- a loan program compliance review; and
- a federal regulatory compliance review.
Every loan selected for review undergoes a complete re-verification of
employment, deposit, mortgage and rental history. A new residential mortgage
credit report is ordered on 10% of the selected loans, while a new review
appraisal is ordered on another 10% of the selected loans. This review also
includes procedures intended to detect evidence of fraudulent documentation
and/or imprudent activity during the processing, funding, servicing or selling
of the mortgage loan. Verification of occupancy and applicable information is
made by regular mail. Over each 12-month period, our quality control provider is
required to include loans of all product types, all states of operation and all
loans with high-risk characteristics. Its quality control reports include
individual loan overviews, loan group overviews and key trends or patterns
summarized on a monthly and year-to-date basis. We evaluate our provider's
quality control reports on a regular basis and address any deficiencies
specified in the reports. To date, these quality control reviews have not
uncovered any material deficiencies.
18
<PAGE>
REPURCHASES
Our agreements to sell loans to institutional lenders generally require us
to repurchase any loan if the representations made in the agreement are
materially inaccurate. Such representations are customary in sales agreements
and generally relate to the qualification of the borrower. See "Risk Factors--If
we have to repurchase loans originated for or sold to lenders, our operating
results could be materially adversely affected."
FINANCING AND SALE OF LOANS AND SERVICING RIGHTS
WAREHOUSE FINANCING
We use our secured revolving credit facility to fund loan originations and
finance originated loans until they are sold. In February 1999, Fannie Mae
reinstated our ability to use their ASAP Plus repurchase program for funding
loans held for sale. In fiscal 1999, 66% of our loans funded by Monument
Mortgage were sold to Fannie Mae. In June 1999, we received a commitment for a
new facility from Residential Funding Corporation, which we expect to close in
July 1999. Under the proposed terms of this facility, we will have available a
$75 million revolving line of credit secured by the mortgage loans we close. We
will be required to comply with various operating and financial covenants
including covenants relating to:
- net worth;
- maximum debt limits;
- debt to equity ratio;
- restrictions on changes in our executive management; and
- continued quotation on Nasdaq.
In accordance with industry practice, this facility will be renewable by the
lender annually. At April 30, 1999, the outstanding balance under our facilities
was $33 million.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Prior to the sale of originated mortgage loans, we bear the market risk on
the value of the loans. If market interest rates rise between the time we commit
to originate a loan at a specific rate and the time such loans are priced for
sale, the market price of the loan declines, resulting in a loss on the sale of
the loan. To protect against such losses, we attempt to manage our interest rate
risk exposure through hedging transactions using a combination of forward sales
of mortgage-backed securities and forward whole-loan sales to fix the sales
price of loans we expect to close. Forward sales means sales of loans with
settlement dates more than five days in the future. Before entering into forward
sales, forward commitments or hedging, we perform an analysis of our loans with
committed interest rates, taking into account such factors as the estimated
portion of such loans that will ultimately be funded, note rate, interest rates,
inventories of loans and applications and other factors to determine the type
and amount of forward commitment and hedging transactions. We attempt to make
forward commitments for or hedge substantially all of our estimated interest
rate risk on our loans. We do not believe that hedging our interest rate risk
with respect to our non-prime loans is cost effective because these loans
generally have higher interest spreads and generally lack sensitivity to
interest rate changes due to their credit characteristics and the short period
of time we hold them. We believe that we have implemented a cost-effective
hedging program to provide a level of protection against changes in the market
value of our fixed-rate mortgage loans held for sale. We utilize the services of
a nationally known risk management consultant, Tuttle & Co., to assist us. An
effective hedging strategy is complex, and no hedging strategy can completely
insulate us against interest rate changes.
19
<PAGE>
LOAN SALES
We customarily sell all loans we fund to one of the government-sponsored
mortgage entities, to an institutional investor, or to one of the national
privately sponsored mortgage conduits. A primary component of our business
strategy is to seek the most efficient method of selling our mortgage loans. We
evaluate the sale of each mortgage loan type and compare prices available for
each alternative method of sale, given current market conditions at the time and
the risk characteristics of the mortgage loan type to determine which method of
sale to utilize.
We currently sell our conforming loans through concurrent transactions or
assignments of trade or whole-loan sales. Concurrent transactions involve a sale
of the underlying mortgage loan directly to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac with a
concurrent sale of the servicing rights to an independent servicer. Assignment
of trade sales are sales of conforming loans to a third party along with an
assignment of the associated mortgage backed security commitment/trade. The
third party then exchanges the loans with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac for mortgage
backed securities issued by them which are then delivered against the assigned
trade. In a whole-loan sale, individual loans are underwritten to the standards
of and sold to a specific buyer on a forward commitment or over-the-counter
basis. Jumbo and Alternative A mortgage loans are currently sold in whole-loan
sales on a forward commitment basis. We sell our non-prime loans and home equity
lines and closed-end second mortgage loans through whole-loan sales.
The sale of mortgage loans may generate a cash and accounting gain or loss.
Gains or losses result primarily from two factors. First, we may originate a
loan at a price that may be higher or lower than we would receive if we
immediately sold the loan in the secondary market. These pricing differences
occur principally as a result of competitive pricing conditions in the primary
loan origination market. Second, gains or losses may result from changes in
interest rates that cause changes in the market value of the loans from the time
the price commitment is given to the customer until the time that the loan is
sold to the investor. We apply interest rate risk management techniques to
reduce the net effect of interest rate changes on the gain or loss on loan
sales.
We sell some of our loans on a forward commitment or other deferred delivery
and payment basis and have credit risk exposure to the extent purchasers are
unable to meet the terms of their forward purchase contracts. As is customary in
the marketplace, none of the forward payment obligations of any of our
counterparties is currently secured or subject to margin requirements, although
we attempt to limit our credit exposure on forward sales arrangements by
entering into forward sales contracts exclusively with institutions that we
believe are sound credit risks, and by limiting our exposure to any single
counterparty.
SALES OF SERVICING RIGHTS
When a loan is originated, a corresponding right to service the loan is
created. Although we currently have a small loan servicing portfolio, our
current strategy is to realize the value of this right by selling our loans
without retaining the right to service the loan or by selling the servicing
rights separately from the loan. As a result, we minimize risk associated with
defaults and early prepayments of those loans. However, we service the loans we
close between the date of funding the loan and the date we sell the loan and the
related servicing in the secondary market. We have no plans for retaining
servicing rights on loans we underwrite, fund and close.
RECOURSE
By selling all the loans we close, we reduce our exposure to default risk
(other than first-payment defaults by customers) and most of the prepayment risk
normally inherent in the mortgage lending business. However, in connection with
whole-loan sales and exchanges, we make representations and warranties to the
buyers of the loans relating to, among other things, compliance with laws,
regulations
20
<PAGE>
and program standards and accuracy of information. In the event of a breach of
these representations and warranties, we may be required to repurchase these
mortgage loans and indemnify the investors for damages caused by the breach. If
a repurchase request is made, we would either attempt to remedy the deficiency
and have the investors rescind the rejection of the mortgage loan or refinance
or sell the mortgage loan, sometimes at a loss. In addition, in connection with
some non-prime loan sales, we may be required to return a portion of the premium
received upon the sale of the loan if the loan is prepaid by the borrower within
the first year after sale. We have been able to minimize the risks of loan
rejection and repurchase of loans made by Monument Mortgage by using automated
underwriting systems and by implementing a stringent quality assurance program
that monitors the most important stages of the mortgage loan closing process. We
may be obligated, however, to repurchase loans made by some of the companies we
acquired. See "Risk Factors--If we have to repurchase loans originated for or
sold to lenders, our operating results could be materially adversely affected."
SERVICING
We currently hold the rights to process the monthly payments on certain
mortgage loans and we collect a servicing fee from the monthly mortgage payments
for doing this work. We plan to discontinue this line of business by the third
quarter of fiscal 2000. As of April 30, 1999, the total principal amount of
loans serviced by us was approximately $390 million.
MORTGAGE BANKING REGULATION
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation by federal and state
authorities. For example, the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development, or HUD, regulates certain aspects of the mortgage lending business,
as do the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Trade Commission. The Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974, or RESPA, and the Truth in Lending
Act, Federal statutes, require that certain disclosures, such as good faith
estimates of settlement charges, a Truth-in-Lending Statement and a HUD-1
settlement statement be provided to borrowers and that certain information, such
as the HUD Settlement Costs booklet, also be provided to borrowers. The Federal
Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibit discrimination
and various state statutes prohibit unfair and deceptive trade practices, and
impose disclosure and other requirements in connection with the mortgage loan
origination process. If we fail to comply with such regulations, possible
consequences could include loss of approved status, demands for indemnification,
class action lawsuits and administrative enforcement actions.
Additionally, RESPA contains certain prohibitions regarding the giving or
taking of a fee, kickback, or anything of value for the referral of business to
any specific person or organization. However, the payment of reasonable
compensation for the provision of goods, services and facilities is generally
not prohibited.
In California, regulation and licensing of mortgage brokers and lenders
falls under the California Department of Real Estate or the California
Department of Corporations. Other than banking industry employees and other
persons who are exempt from the licensing requirements of the California
Department of Real Estate and California Department of Corporations, individuals
engaged directly in the origination of loans or the dissemination of certain
information are required to be licensed by the California Department of Real
Estate or the California Department of Corporations. We and some of our
subsidiaries are also required to be licensed in other states in which we have
offices or operate. Although we have the licenses required in California and
several other states and believe that we will be able to obtain licenses
required in other states from time to time, we cannot be sure that we will
successfully comply with the many government regulations and licensing
requirements to which we are subject. If we fail to comply with these legal
requirements, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
21
<PAGE>
COMPETITION
The e-commerce market is new, rapidly evolving and intensely competitive,
and we expect competition to intensify in the future. Barriers to entry are
minimal, and current and new competitors can launch new sites on the Internet at
relatively low cost. In addition, the residential mortgage loan business is
intensely competitive. We currently compete with a variety of other companies
offering mortgage services including:
- various on-line mortgage brokers, including E-LOAN, Inc., iOwn.com,
Mortgage.com, QuickenMortgage.com, Lendingtree and Keystroke Financial;
- a number of indirect competitors that derive a substantial portion of
their revenues from on-line commerce, including Yahoo! and Microsoft
Corporation, through which other on-line mortgage companies may offer
products;
- mortgage banking companies, commercial banks, savings associations, credit
unions and other financial institutions which originate mortgage loans;
and
- mortgage brokers.
Many of our mortgage banking and mortgage brokerage competitors have
significant competitive advantages including the following:
- longer operating histories;
- greater name recognition and more extensive customer bases; and
- substantially greater financial, marketing, technical and other resources.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Trademarks and other proprietary rights are important to our success and our
competitive position. We currently hold a number of trademarks, service marks,
patents and copyrights. Although we seek to protect our trademarks and other
proprietary rights through a variety of means, we may not have taken adequate
steps to protect these rights. We will continue to license content from third
parties in the future and it is possible that we could be subjected to
infringement actions based upon the content licensed from these third parties.
Any claims brought against us, regardless of their merit, could result in costly
litigation and the diversion of our financial resources and technical and
management personnel. Further, if such claims are proved valid, through
litigation or otherwise, we may be required to change our trademarks or other
proprietary marks and pay financial damages, which could adversely affect our
business.
We currently enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our new
employees, consultants and corporate partners to control access to and
distribution of our technologies, documentation and other proprietary
information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights from
unauthorized use or disclosure, parties may attempt to disclose, obtain or use
our proprietary rights. The steps we have taken may not prevent misappropriation
of our proprietary rights, particularly in foreign countries where laws or law
enforcement practices may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the
United States.
EMPLOYEES
As of June 30, 1999, we had 144 full-time and 12 part-time employees.
Thirty-seven employees comprise the business-to-consumer division and 63
employees comprise the business-to-business division. Four employees comprise
the marketing department, and 52 employees comprise technology, administration
and support areas. None of our employees is represented by a union. Management
believe that its relations with employees are good.
22
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding FiNet.com's
executive officers and directors as of May 31, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ----------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Mark L. Korell....................................... 51 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer
L. Daniel Rawitch.................................... 40 Vice Chairman of the Board
Thomas L. Porter..................................... 52 Executive Vice President--Administration
Michael G. Conway.................................... 50 Executive Vice President--Capital Markets
Gary A. Palmer....................................... 45 Executive Vice President--Chief Financial Officer
Kevin Gillespie...................................... 41 Executive Vice President--Sales and Marketing
Christos Skeadas..................................... 52 Executive Vice President--Chief Technology Officer
Jan C. Hoeffel....................................... 62 Director
S. Lewis Meyer(1)(2)................................. 54 Director
Stephen J. Sogin, Ph.D.(2)........................... 57 Director
Richard E. Wilkes(1)(2).............................. 53 Director
Antonio P. Falcao(1)................................. 27 Director
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Member of the Audit Committee
(2) Member of the Compensation Committee
MARK KORELL has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of FiNet.com since October 1998, and as President since May 1999. Prior to
joining FiNet.com, Mr. Korell served as the Chief Executive Officer of IMX,
Inc., an e-commerce software firm, from 1997 to 1998; the Chief Executive
Officer of Norwest Mortgage, Inc., the nation's largest mortgage lender and loan
servicer, from 1995 to 1997; and the Chief Executive Officer of GMAC Mortgage
Group and its Residential Funding Corp. subsidiary, from 1986 to 1995. He also
served as assistant to the Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board and
Deputy Director of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Mr. Korell received a
B.S. degree in engineering from the University of Wisconsin and an M.B.A. degree
from Stanford University.
DANIEL RAWITCH has served as Vice Chairman of the Board since May 1999. He
also served us in various other positions, including as President of FiNet.com
from October 1998 to May 1999 and as its Chief Executive Officer from May 1995
to October 1998. Prior to joining FiNet.com, he served as Chief Executive
Officer of Residential Pacific Mortgage, Inc., from 1989 until it was acquired
by FiNet.com in August 1994.
THOMAS PORTER has served as FiNet.com's Executive Vice
President--Administration since August 1998. Prior to joining FiNet.com, he was
Vice President--Financial Planning and Analysis with Medaphis Corporation, a
health services provider, from December 1996 to August 1998. From June 1994 to
June 1996, Mr. Porter served as Senior Vice President--Finance for McKesson's
Drug Company.
MICHAEL CONWAY has served as FiNet.com's Executive Vice President--Capital
Markets since October 1998. Prior to joining FiNet.com, Mr. Conway was Executive
Vice President--Marketing for North American Mortgage Company (formerly IMCO
Realty Services, Inc. and Wells Fargo Mortgage) from August 1985 to
October 1997 where he was responsible for product development and pricing,
hedging, and selling residential loan production. Mr. Conway received his M.B.A.
degree from the University of California, Los Angeles.
23
<PAGE>
GARY PALMER has served as FiNet.com's Executive Vice President--Chief
Financial Officer since December 1998. Prior to joining FiNet.com, he was an
independent financial consultant from January 1997 to December 1998. From
October 1995 to December 1997, he served as Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary of Southern Pacific Funding Corporation. Prior
to that, Mr. Palmer served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Gentra
Capital Corporation. Mr. Palmer received his B.S. degree in Business
Administration from the University of Vermont and his M.B.A. degree from the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
KEVIN GILLESPIE has served as FiNet.com's Executive Vice President--Sales
and Marketing since March 1999. From April 1998 until joining FiNet.com, he
served as Executive Vice President of Standard Financial Corporation, a
California subprime mortgage lender. He was an Executive Vice President at
Weyerhaeuser Mortgage Corporation from 1996 to 1997. Mr. Gillespie received his
A.A. degree from Owens College.
CHRIS SKEADAS has served as FiNet.com's Executive Vice President--Chief
Technology Officer since April 1999. Prior to joining FiNet.com, he was Chief
Information Officer for GMAC Mortgage Corporation from 1996 to 1999. From 1993
to 1995, he served as Senior Vice President--Technical Services at Galileo
International Partnership. Mr. Skeadas received his B.A. degree in Mathematics
from Columbia University and his M.S. degree in Mathematics from Renssealaer
Polytechnic Institute.
JAN C. HOEFFEL has served as a director since November 1995. Mr. Hoeffel was
the founder and president of Finex Corporation, a technology-oriented mortgage
broker which was acquired by FiNet.com in December 1991. After the acquisition,
Mr. Hoeffel served as FiNet.com's Executive Vice President until mid-1992. He
rejoined FiNet.com in mid-1995 and became President and a director in
November 1995; Mr. Hoeffel served as President until October 1998.
LEWIS MEYER has served as a director since January 1997. Since June 1993,
Dr. Meyer has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Imatron Inc., a
company engaged in designing, manufacturing and marketing a high performance
tomography scanner. From April 1991 until joining Imatron, Dr. Meyer was Vice
President, Operations of Otsuka Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc. From August 1990 to
April 1991, he was a founding partner of Medical Capital Management, a company
engaged in providing consulting services to medical equipment manufacturers,
imaging services providers and related medical professionals. Before that, he
was Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Health Services
Corp. (now Insight Health Services), a developer and operator of diagnostic
imaging and treatment centers. Dr. Meyer is also a director of BSD Medical
Corporation. Dr. Meyer received his B.S. degree in Physics from the University
of the Pacific and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Physics from Purdue University.
STEPHEN SOGIN has served as a director since March 1990. Dr. Sogin is a
venture capitalist. From December 1984 until January 1995, he was a general
partner of Montgomery Medical Ventures. In July 1997, Dr. Sogin consented to a
cease and desist order issued by the SEC involving his late filing of Forms 3, 4
and 5 which he was required to file in his capacity as a general partner of
Montgomery Medical Ventures II. None of the SEC's findings involve charges that
Dr. Sogin received improper gains or personal benefits as a result of these
violations. Dr. Sogin has advised FiNet.com that the trades in question were
conducted by the partnership (Montgomery Medical Ventures II) and none of these
trades were executed by him personally. Dr. Sogin is also a director of
Osteotech, Inc. Dr. Sogin received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
microbiology from the University of Illinois.
RICHARD WILKES has served as a director since November 1998. Since
April 1999 he has been President and Chief Executive Officer of IMX, Inc., a
company engaged in the business of electronic trading of mortgages. Prior to
that he was a principal in Mortgage Outsource Services, a provider of pre- and
post-closing services to the residential mortgage industry. In October 1995,
Mr. Wilkes founded Group Millennium, a consulting company specializing in
mergers and acquisitions and strategic
24
<PAGE>
planning for the mortgage banking industry. From 1989 to 1995, Mr. Wilkes was
employed by MacAndrews and Forbes Holdings, Inc.
ANTONIO FALCAO has served as a director since February 1999. Since 1994,
Mr. Falcao has been the Chief Financial Officer for several companies of the
A. Amorim Group, a business group based in Portugal that owns Banco Nacional de
Credito Imobiliario, a Portuguese real estate bank. The A. Amorim Group, which
is affiliated with Americo Ferreira Amorim, one of our largest stockholders,
also has interests in the cork, textile, hotel, oil, finance and
telecommunications industries. Mr. Falcao received his degree in Finance and
Economics from the University of Oporto.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT BUSINESS SEGMENTS
See the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for financial
information of the two business segments or channels we operate in: the
business-to-business channel and the business-to-consumer channel.
BUSINESS RISKS
See Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations."
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
We are headquartered in Walnut Creek, California, where our current facility
occupies approximately 17,042 square feet of space. In addition to housing the
administrative offices, this facility also houses the operations of the
business-to-business segment. The lease for this facility expires in February
2001. We also lease 9,719 square feet of space in San Ramon, California, where
the business-to-consumer segment is operated. In June 1999, we leased an
additional facility, also located in San Ramon, California. We plan to
consolidate our Northern California facilities into the new facility.
During fiscal 1999, Coastal leased facilities in Manalapan, New Jersey and
Mical leased facilities in San Diego, California. Our Coastal and Mical business
units have been closed, and we expect to sublease any excess facilities created
by these closures.
We believe that our facilities are adequate to support anticipated
operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On January 14, 1998, prior to our acquisition of Mical, a lawsuit was filed
against Mical in the United States District Court for the Middle District of
Georgia. The complaint alleges, among other things, that in connection with
residential mortgage loan closings, Mical made certain payments to mortgage
brokers in violation of the RESPA and induced mortgage brokers to breach their
alleged fiduciary duties to their customers. The plaintiffs seek unspecified
compensatory and punitive damages as to certain claims.
We believe that our compensation programs for mortgage brokers comply with
applicable laws and with long standing industry practices. We intend to defend
vigorously against this action and believe that the ultimate resolution will not
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
On April 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of San Francisco by a former director and officer of
FiNet.com against FiNet.com and one of its current directors. The complaint
alleges, among other things, that the plaintiff and our current director entered
into an oral contract, wherein they agreed to share all profits from bonus
shares that were issued to either party under certain specific circumstances. It
is further alleged that we issued to our current
25
<PAGE>
director 1,800,000 shares of stock and that our current director failed to
provide the plaintiff one-half of the stock, or 900,000 shares. The plaintiff
seeks to recover 900,000 shares of our common stock and punitive damages as to
certain of the claims. We have filed in the Superior Court a general denial of
all claims and a motion to strike portions of the plaintiff's complaint.
FiNet.com and certain subsidiaries are defendants in various legal
proceedings involving matters generally incidental to their business. We do not
expect that the aggregate liability or loss, if any, resulting therefrom or from
the matters described above will have a material adverse effect on our business
results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On April 23, 1999, FiNet.com solicited the written consent of stockholders
to approve a resolution authorizing an amendment to its restated certificate of
incorporation to change its name from Finet Holdings Corporation to FiNet.com,
Inc. The necessary affirmative written consent representing a majority of the
issued and outstanding shares was received. Effective June 1, 1999, the Company
name was changed to FiNet.com, Inc.
On December 21, 1998 a definitive proxy statement was filed to solicit the
written consent of the stockholders of FiNet.com to approve the issuance,
offering and sale by the Company of up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock in a
private placement at a price of $0.60 per share. FiNet.com solicited the
stockholders' consent, as the offering, if fully subscribed, would result in the
issuance in excess of 20% of FiNet.com's outstanding common stock. The offering
was previously presented to and approved by the stockholders of the Company at
the 1998 Annual Meeting. However, to ensure that FiNet.com had obtained the
informed consent of its stockholders to the offering, the consent clarified the
price at which the shares of common stock were expected to be sold. FiNet.com
received the requisite consent necessary to complete the offering.
26
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market since June 1, 1999
under the symbol "FNCM". Prior to that, our common stock traded on the Nasdaq
SmallCap Market under the symbol "FNHC." The following table sets forth the high
and low sale prices of our common stock on Nasdaq for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HIGH LOW
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
FISCAL 1998
Fourth quarter.............................................................. $ 4.25 $ 2.88
Third quarter............................................................... 7.63 3.50
Second quarter.............................................................. 8.00 2.57
First quarter............................................................... 6.38 2.19
FISCAL 1999
Fourth quarter.............................................................. 18.25 0.81
Third quarter............................................................... 1.75 0.63
Second quarter.............................................................. 3.03 0.41
First quarter............................................................... 4.19 2.13
</TABLE>
As of June 30, 1999, there were approximately 479 holders of record of our
common stock. On June 30, 1999, the last reported sale price of our common stock
on the Nasdaq Market was $5.56.
DIVIDENDS
We have not paid, and we do not currently intend to pay, cash dividends on
our common stock. The current policy of our Board of Directors is to retain
earnings, if any, to provide funds for operation and expansion of our business.
The payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the
Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our earnings,
capital requirements and financial position. In addition, our ability to pay
dividends may be limited under future loan agreements which restrict or prohibit
the payment of dividends.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During fiscal 1999, FiNet.com issued the securities set forth below which
were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Except for sales pursuant to Regulation S, which were made in compliance
with Regulation S, the sales of the following securities were made in reliance
upon the exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act under
Section 4(2) thereof or Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering. The purchasers of the securities
described below acquired them for their own account and not with a view toward
distribution thereof to the public. The certificates evidencing the securities
bear legends stating that the shares may not be offered, sold or otherwise
transferred other than pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act, or an exemption from such registration requirements.
In March and May of 1998, FiNet.com issued $7,000,000 principal amount of
the Company's 3% Subordinated Convertible Debentures and warrants to purchase
175,000 shares of common stock to accredited investors in a private placement.
In a restructuring of this transaction in January 1999, the debentures were
converted into 9,533,333 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 840,000
shares of common stock.
27
<PAGE>
In September 1998, FiNet.com issued 250 shares of its Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $1.00 per share to accredited investors in a private placement
for an aggregate purchase price of $2,500,000. The Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock was redeemed in January 1999 and February 1999.
In November 1998, FiNet.com issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock in a
private placement to an accredited investor for an aggregate purchase price of
$2,000,000.
In January 1999, FiNet.com issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to an
existing stockholder pursuant to an indemnity agreement.
During the third quarter of its 1999 fiscal year, FiNet.com issued
22,740,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 122,675 shares of
common stock to accredited investors in a series of private placements for an
aggregate purchase price of $12,431,000. In addition, FiNet.com issued warrants
to purchase 2,449,867 shares of common stock to the placement agents for such
transactions. One such placement agent received placement agent fees of $812,358
in connection with the transactions.
28
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes to our
consolidated financial statements and with "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," which appear elsewhere in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table provides selected
historical consolidated financial information of FiNet.com. We prepared this
information using the consolidated financial statements of FiNet.com as of the
dates indicated and for each of the fiscal years in the five year period ended
April 30, 1999. We derived the consolidated statement of operations and balance
sheet data as of and for each of the fiscal years in the five year period ended
April 30, 1999 from FiNet.com's financial statements audited by Ernst & Young,
LLP (1999), Reuben E. Price (1998, 1997), Deloitte & Touche (1996, 1995),
independent public accountants for FiNet.com.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED APRIL 30,
-------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999 1998 1997 1996(2) 1995(2)
---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenues.................................................... $ 22,413 $ 15,160 $ 12,344 $ 6,375 $ 5,237
Cost of revenues............................................ 35,064 14,718 9,316 4,591 3,068
---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------
Gross profit................................................ (12,651) 442 3,028 1,784 2,169
Operating expenses.......................................... 20,906 9,175 5,775 1,444 1,923
---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) from operations............................... (33,557) (8,733) (2,747) 340 246
---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss)........................................... (36,538) (9,379) (2,778) 326 237
In-substance preferred stock dividend....................... 705 -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) for common stockholders................... $ (37,243) $ (9,379) $ (2,778) $ 326 $ 237
Per Share Data:
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share.......... $ (0.79) $ (0.31) $ (0.19) $ 0.04 $ 2.37
Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding(1)...... 46,867 30,433 14,313 8,400 100
Cash dividends per common share............................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 4.45 $ 2.10
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 4,202 $ 1,993 $ 1,147 $ 672 $ 392
Mortgage loans held for sale, net........................... 33,438 63,034 24,244 10,675 3,196
Total assets................................................ 45,255 101,468 33,070 25,215 15,091
Warehouse and other lines of credit......................... 33,038 86,659 26,902 19,732 11,109
Total liabilities........................................... 38,567 98,109 30,596 22,629 12,184
Stockholders' equity........................................ $ 6,688 $ 3,359 $ 2,474 $ 2,587 $ 2,908
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for an explanation of
the determination of the number of shares used in computing per share data.
(2) Selected financial data for the fiscal years ended April 30, 1996 and 1995
do not include data for our Coastal subsidiary which was acquired in a
pooling transaction on April 30, 1998, because its inclusion is not
meaningful in assessing trends of FiNet.com and its business was
discontinued in fiscal 1999.
29
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
WE HAVE MADE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
THAT ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INCLUDE
INFORMATION CONCERNING OUR POSSIBLE OR ASSUMED FUTURE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
ALSO, WHEN WE USE SUCH WORDS AS "BELIEVE," "EXPECT," "ANTICIPATE," "PLAN,"
"COULD," "INTEND" OR SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS, WE ARE MAKING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS. YOU SHOULD NOTE THAT AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES INVOLVES
CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD AFFECT OUR FUTURE FINANCIAL RESULTS.
OUR ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED IN THESE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF CERTAIN FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE SET
FORTH IN "FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE PERFORMANCE" AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
OVERVIEW
FiNet.com is a full service, on-line mortgage banker that offers an
easy-to-use, one stop mortgage source for consumers and mortgage brokers. We
operate one of the first sites on the Internet that enables the consumer to
apply for and receive credit approval on-line, and to electronically search,
analyze and select from a wide variety of mortgage loan products and rates
offered by us and other lenders. We make the mortgage process easier and more
understandable, while maintaining quality service by controlling the consumer's
entire mortgage lending experience. We also provide on-line and e-commerce
technologies and loan process management tools to mortgage broker businesses to
enable them to compete more effectively with on-line and other national lenders
and brokers, and help their customers make better informed borrowing decisions.
We earn revenues through both the origination and sale of mortgage loans. As
a retail originator of loans, we generate loan origination income and
loan-related fees through loans funded and brokered by us. Our loan origination
income consists of origination points paid to us by borrowers or discount points
paid to us by wholesale lenders. Our loan-related fees consist of application,
documentation and processing fees paid by borrowers.
On the loans that we sell, we generate revenues from net premium income and
interest income. Net premium income consists of the net gain on the sale of
mortgage loans and mortgage servicing rights. This net gain is recognized based
upon the difference between the combined selling price of the loans and their
related servicing rights, on the one hand, and the carrying value of the
mortgage loans and servicing rights sold, on the other. Interest income consists
of the interest we receive on our mortgage loans held for sale.
Our costs and expenses consist largely of:
- interest paid under our warehouse credit facilities;
- loan-related expenses, consisting of fees paid to third parties for
appraisal and credit report services and reserves for potential loan
repurchase and premium recapture obligations;
- salaries, commissions and benefits paid to employees;
- general and administrative expenses such as occupancy costs, office
expenses and professional services; and
- depreciation and amortization expense related principally to our
facilities, computers and goodwill associated with our acquisitions.
Seasonality affects the mortgage industry because loan originations are
typically at their lowest levels during the first and fourth calendar quarters
due to a reduced level of home buying activity during the winter months. Loan
originations generally increase during the warmer months beginning in March and
continuing through October. As a result, we may report earnings in our fiscal
third and fourth quarters that are generally lower than that of the first and
second quarters. However, due to
30
<PAGE>
significant refinance activity during 1997 and 1998, which was generally
affected more by changes in interest rates than by seasons, the expected
seasonal patterns are not evident in our historical financial statements. In the
future, our expenses are also likely to vary quarter-to-quarter based upon
fluctuations in the volume of loans we originate due to seasonality and other
factors.
Economic and interest rate cycles also affect the mortgage industry, as loan
originations typically fall in rising interest rate environments. During such
periods, refinancing originations decrease as higher interest rates provide
reduced economic incentives for borrowers to refinance their existing mortgages.
Due to stable and decreasing interest rate environments over recent years, our
historical performance may not be indicative of results in rising interest rate
environments. In addition, our recent and rapid growth may distort some of our
ratios and financial statistics and may make period-to-period comparisons
difficult. In light of this growth, our historical earnings performance may be
of little relevance in predicting future performance. Furthermore, our financial
statistics may not be indicative of our results in future periods.
On April 30, 1998, we acquired Coastal Federal Mortgage ("Coastal") in a
transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests. Our results of operations
and financial position for the fiscal years ended April 30, 1998 and 1997 have
been restated to include Coastal's results. Coastal's results for years prior to
fiscal 1997 have not been included in our consolidated results, as they are not
meaningful in assessing our historical trends. On May 19, 1998, we acquired
Mical Mortgage, ("Mical") in a transaction accounted for as a purchase. Mical's
results of operations are included in our financial statements since the date of
acquisition. Due to significant operating problems and losses at Coastal and
Mical, our new management elected to close both units during fiscal 1999.
IMPACT OF OUR DISCONTINUED UNITS--MICAL, COASTAL AND OUR SERVICING BUSINESS
We incurred significant losses at both our Mical and Coastal subsidiaries
during fiscal 1999. New management elected to discontinue the businesses of both
of these subsidiaries in the last half of fiscal 1999. In addition, management
determined that servicing loans would not be a part of on-going operations and
began preparing our servicing portfolios for sale. The following table
summarizes the impact these discontinued business units had on our consolidated
operating results for the last three fiscal years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
--------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
---------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues................................................................. $ 10,865 $ 9,344 $ 7,623
Cost of revenues......................................................... 21,165 2,200 1,124
---------- --------- ---------
Gross profit............................................................. (10,300) 7,144 6,499
Other expenses
General and administrative............................................. 2,945 5,011 3,519
Marketing and advertising.............................................. 434 288 307
Special charges........................................................ 4,236 -- --
Depreciation and amortization.......................................... 180 139 106
Other.................................................................. 434 926 853
---------- --------- ---------
Total expenses........................................................... 8,229 6,364 4,785
---------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) from operations............................................ (18,529) 780 1,714
Other interest expense................................................... 207 6 9
---------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before income taxes.................................... (18,736) 774 1,705
Income tax expense....................................................... 1 226 225
---------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss).................................................... $ (18,737) $ 548 $ 1,480
========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FISCAL 1999 COMPARED TO FISCAL 1998
REVENUES
Loan volume increased by $718 million, or 118%, to $1,328 million in fiscal
1999 from $610 million in fiscal 1998 as a result of a significant increase in
the number of loans funded through our mortgage banking subsidiaries, volume
attributable to acquired operations, and significant refinancing activity
stimulated by relatively low interest rates. Refinancings accounted for 69% of
our loan volume in fiscal 1999, compared to 65% in fiscal 1998.
Revenues for fiscal 1999 increased by $7.2 million, or 47%, to
$22.4 million from $15.2 million in fiscal 1998. This increase resulted
primarily from the incremental volume of funded loans from Mical and increased
volumes of originated loans generated by our Interloan.com website, both of
which were purchased in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Loans originated by
mortgage brokers and funded by us accounted for $4.4 million in additional
revenues, or 61% of the increase for the year. Loans we originated, most of
which were funded by other lenders, accounted for $2.5 million in additional
revenues, or 34% of the increase for the year.
COST OF REVENUES
Cost of revenues for fiscal 1999 increased by $20.4 million, or 139%, to
$35.1 million from $14.7 million in fiscal 1998. This increase resulted
primarily from an increase in direct costs associated with increased volumes of
funded loans from the purchase of Mical, increased indirect production expenses
from the purchases of the Interloan.com website and Mical, and provisions for
losses on mortgages held for sale and receivables. Increased volumes of funded
loans accounted for $7.7 million in additional costs, or 38% of the increase for
the year. Indirect production expenses accounted for $5.9 million in additional
costs, or 29% of the increase for the year.
Provisions for losses increased by $5.8 million to $6.5 million in fiscal
1999 from $718,000 in fiscal 1998. The Company records provisions for losses to
reflect market valuation allowances on mortgages held for sale and mortgage
loans previously sold (off-balance sheet risk) and provisions for doubtful
accounts receivable. The Company evaluates the collectibility of its accounts
receivable primarily on a receivable by receivable basis, as accounts receivable
is composed of amounts that do not necessarily carry similar risk
characteristics, such as amounts heldback by purchasers on sales of mortgage
loans and amounts heldback on sales of servicing rights. Additionally, the
Company maintains communications with such purchasers and others from whom
receivables are due and in certain circumstances, determines the allowance
necessary based on agreed upon amounts.
The Company determines its market valuation allowance relating to mortgages
held for sale and mortgages that have been sold primarily on a loan by loan
basis. The allowance is based on factors such as market values, bids received,
industry loss experience and the Company's prior loss experience, if any, as
well as risk characteristics of the loan portfolio.
$2.2 million, or 38%, of the increase in provision for losses was
attributable to the provision for doubtful accounts recorded at the Company's
Mical Mortgage subsidiary. Mical was acquired by the Company in a business
combination accounted for as a purchase in May 1998. Accordingly, the provision
for doubtful accounts of Mical is included in the Company's results of
operations only subsequent to the acquisition date--only for fiscal 1999, and
accounts for the entire increase. The remaining increase in the provision for
losses relates to increased provisions for losses on mortgages held for sale and
mortgages previously sold (off-balance sheet risk). This increase was
attributable primarily to the Mical Mortgage subsidiary but additionally to
provisions for loan losses recorded by the Coastal Federal Mortgage subsidiary.
Loans originated at Mical and at Coastal, acquired in May and April 1998, had
risk characteristics and loss recourse provisions that were dissimilar from the
risk characteristics and sale recourse provisions of the Company prior to their
acquisitions.
32
<PAGE>
GROSS PROFIT/LOSS
Gross profit for fiscal 1999 decreased by $13.1 million to a loss of
$12.7 million from a profit of $442,000 in fiscal 1998 as a result of the
increase in our cost of revenues.
OPERATING EXPENSES
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses for fiscal
1999 increased by $5.8 million, or 98%, to $11.7 million from $5.9 million in
fiscal 1998. This increase resulted primarily from the acquisition of Mical and
increased expenses.
MARKETING AND ADVERTISING. Marketing and advertising expenses for fiscal
1999 increased by $1.3 million, or 141%, to $2.2 million from $921,000 in fiscal
1998. This increase resulted primarily from Internet advertising expenses.
SPECIAL CHARGES. Special charges of $4.9 million were established in fiscal
1999 and include $3.8 million of goodwill writeoff and restructuring charges
associated with the discontinuance of the business of Mical, a $690,000
writedown of purchased software and $405,000 to liquidate certain assets and
liabilities in connection with the discontinuance of the business of Coastal.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expenses for
fiscal 1999 increased by $164,000, or 34%, to $646,000 from $482,000 in fiscal
1998. The increase was due primarily to the increase in assets acquired with the
purchase of Mical.
OTHER. Other operating expense for fiscal 1999 increased by $625,000, or
71%, to $1.5 million from $875,000 in fiscal 1998. This increase resulted
primarily from charges recorded to value warrants issued when our 3% Convertible
Debentures were converted to common stock.
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE
Other interest expense for fiscal 1999 increased by $2.6 million, or 619%,
to $3.0 million from $420,000 for fiscal 1998. The increase was primarily the
result of amortization of the imputed interest and debt issuance costs on our 3%
Convertible Subordinated Debentures, which were issued in March and May 1998.
The debt was redeemed in January 1999 and the discount has been fully amortized.
INCOME TAXES
As of April 30, 1999, we had approximately $49 million of federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards for tax reporting purposes available to offset
future taxable income. Our federal net operating loss carryforwards begin to
expire in 2004. A valuation allowance has been recorded for the entire deferred
tax asset at April 30, 1999 as a result of uncertainties regarding the
realization of the asset due to the lack of our earnings history.
NET LOSS
Net loss for fiscal 1999 increased by $27.1 million, or 288%, to
$36.5 million from $9.4 million for fiscal 1998, primarily due to the purchases
of Mical and Coastal, increased marketing expenses associated with the purchase
of Interloan.com, and expenses associated with financing transactions.
FISCAL 1998 COMPARED TO FISCAL 1997
REVENUES
Loan volume increased by $222 million, or 53%, to $610 million in fiscal
1998 from $388 million in fiscal 1997 as a result of a significant increase in
the number of loans funded through our mortgage banking subsidiaries and
significant refinancing activity stimulated by relatively low interest rates.
Refinancings accounted for 65% of our origination volume in fiscal 1998 compared
to 48% in fiscal 1997.
33
<PAGE>
Revenues for fiscal 1998 increased by $2.9 million, or 24%, to
$15.2 million from $12.3 million in fiscal 1997. This increase resulted
primarily from increased volumes of funded loans. Loans originated by mortgage
brokers and funded by us accounted for $2.0 million in additional revenues, or
69% of the increase for the year. The volume of loans we originated and funded
accounted for $200,000 in additional revenues, or 7% of the increase for the
year.
COST OF REVENUES
Cost of revenues for fiscal 1998 increased by $5.4 million, or 58%, to
$14.7 million from $9.3 million in fiscal 1997. This increase resulted primarily
from an increase in direct and indirect costs due to increased volumes of funded
loans. Funded loans accounted for $1.3 million in additional costs, or 24% of
the increase for the year. Indirect production expenses accounted for
$3.6 million in additional costs, or 67% of the increase for the year.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit for fiscal 1998 decreased by $2.6 million to $442,000 from
$3.0 million in fiscal 1997 as a result of an increase in our cost of revenues.
OPERATING EXPENSES
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses for fiscal
1998 increased by $1.4 million, or 31%, to $5.9 million from $4.5 million in
fiscal 1997. This increase resulted primarily from the addition of new employees
in our technology and customer service departments.
MARKETING AND ADVERTISING. Marketing and advertising expenses for fiscal
1998 increased by $254,000, or 38%, to $921,000 from $667,000 in fiscal 1997.
This increase resulted primarily from increased advertising expenses associated
with the increased level of loan fundings and the introduction of new products.
SPECIAL CHARGES. In fiscal 1998, we recorded special charges of
$1.0 million to writeoff intangible assets that we determined would no longer be
employed in future operations.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expenses for
fiscal 1998 increased by $377,000 to $482,000 from $105,000, in fiscal 1997. The
increase was primarily due to depreciation of fixed assets acquired to support
increased business activity and staff expansion.
OTHER. Other operating expense for fiscal 1998 increased by $323,000, or
59%, to $875,000 from $552,000 in fiscal 1997. This increase resulted primarily
from expenses related to the acquisition of Mical and Coastal.
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE
Other interest expense for fiscal 1998 increased by $302,000, or 256%, to
$420,000 from $118,000 in fiscal 1997. This increase was the result of
amortization of the imputed interest and debt issuance costs on our 3%
Convertible Subordinated Debentures, which were issued in March 1998.
INCOME TAXES
As of April 30, 1998, we had approximately $31 million of federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards for tax reporting purposes available to offset
future taxable income. Our federal net operating loss carryforwards begin to
expire in 2004. A valuation allowance has been recorded for the entire deferred
tax asset at April 30, 1998 as a result of uncertainties regarding the
realization of the asset due to the lack of our earnings history.
NET LOSS
Net loss for fiscal 1998 increased by $6.6 million, or 236%, to
$9.4 million from $2.8 million for fiscal 1997, primarily due to an increase in
the number of employees and office space in anticipation of
34
<PAGE>
growing the business, consulting expenses related to the acquisition of Monument
in the prior fiscal year, expenses in anticipation of the Mical and Coastal
acquisitions, and intangible asset write downs.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
During our recent operating history we have experienced operating losses and
have relied on external sources of debt and equity financing to fund operations,
to service debt and to complete acquisitions and capital investments. Capital
increases, primarily from private placements of common stock, conversion of debt
to equity, and warrant exercises, partially offset by operating losses have
increased stockholders' equity to $6.7 million at April 30, 1999 from
$3.4 million at April 30, 1998.
In response to our negative operating trends, we have hired new management,
including a new chairman and chief executive officer. The management team's
charter is to improve operations and to take full advantage of our technology
capabilities, ultimately improving our results from operations and our financial
position. Improvement in our financial condition is dependent on our ability to
grow our loan origination volumes, to achieve highly efficient operating
processes and procedures, and to manage interest expense. As of March 1, 1999,
we returned to more favorable borrowing terms as our primary warehouse lender
removed the incremental default interest rates. Our financial condition is
further dependent on economic conditions such as the general health of the
economy and demand for mortgage loans.
Total assets decreased by $56.2 million, or 55%, to $45.3 million at
April 30, 1999 from $101.5 million at April 30, 1998. This decrease was due
primarily to discontinuing our Mical and Coastal units and liquidating the
mortgages held for sale at both units. Mical was acquired in a purchase
transaction in fiscal 1999, and therefore Mical's balance sheet was not included
in our consolidated balance sheet in fiscal 1998. However certain transactions
were entered into in anticipation of the acquisition which increased our
mortgages held for sale and warehouse borrowing liabilities at April 30, 1998.
Therefore, year over year changes are affected by fluctuations in mortgages held
for sale balances at Mical. The decrease in assets is also due to improved
turnover of mortgages held for sale.
Warehouse borrowings decreased by $53.7 million to $33.0 million at
April 30, 1999 from $86.7 million at April 30, 1998 as proceeds from loan sales
were used to reduce the warehouse lines of credit. $5.5 million of our 3%
Convertible Subordinated Debentures were converted to common stock in fiscal
1999. As a result, liabilities decreased by $59.5 million to $38.6 million at
April 30, 1999 from $98.1 million at April 30, 1998.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The nature of the mortgage lending business requires us to advance cash on a
daily basis to fund newly originated loans to our customers. The majority of
these funds are provided through conventional mortgage warehouse lines of credit
and repurchase agreements. We use cash from our operating activities to invest
in mortgages held for sale, to fund ongoing expenses such as administration and
marketing, to invest in product development and geographic expansion, and to
satisfy debt and other obligations as they come due.
Although new operating revenue sources were developed during fiscal 1997,
1998 and 1999, cash generated by operations has been insufficient to meet our
on-going requirements. Therefore, we have employed servicing-secured credit
facilities and private placements of debentures, common stock and preferred
stock as additional resources to meet our operating and investing cash needs.
In fiscal 1999, operating activities used $25.2 million in cash compared to
cash used by operations of $4.3 million during fiscal 1998.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, Mical ceased originating loans.
Coastal ceased originating loans in the first quarter of fiscal 2000. We expect
that the remaining loans held for sale at Mical and Coastal will be sold in the
first quarter of fiscal 2000.
35
<PAGE>
We expect that cash flow from the sale of mortgage loans will increase as we
intend to increase both fundings and sales through additional marketing and
sales efforts in both our business-to-consumer and business-to-business
segments.
Adequate credit facilities and other sources of funding, which permit us to
fund mortgage loans, are essential to our ability to close loans through our
mortgage banking subsidiaries. We borrow money to fund our loan closings and
repay these borrowings as the loans and the accompanying servicing rights are
sold. Upon the sale of loans and servicing rights and the subsequent repayment
of the borrowings, our credit facilities become available to fund additional
loan closings. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 1999, loan funding
was curtailed to reduce the balance of loans held for sale and reduce warehouse
line borrowings in response to a default on our warehouse facilities with
GMAC/RFC. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, sales of loans were accelerated
and the warehouse defaults were cured. Warehouse borrowings were reduced to
below the committed amounts in accordance with the terms of the warehouse
lending extension agreement.
On April 30, 1999, we had two revolving warehouse facilities which were used
to finance loans providing us with up to $45 million of demand loans secured by
loans held for sale. Loans under the warehouse facilities bear interest at rates
that vary from LIBOR plus 2.25% to LIBOR plus 2.75% depending on the type of
underlying loan, and the loans are subject to sublimits, advance rates and terms
that vary depending on the type of underlying loan. These warehouse facilities
require us to comply with various operating and financial covenants. As of
April 30, 1999, our borrowings under our warehouse facilities decreased to
$33.0 million from $86.7 million as of April 30, 1998. At April 30, 1999, our
loans held for sale were $33.4 million compared to $63.0 million at April 30,
1998.
We have also maintained uncommitted purchase and sale agreements, such as
repurchase agreements to fund our mortgages held for sale. These facilities
permit us to diversify our borrowing resources and permit greater origination
volumes. These agreements are not committed facilities and may be terminated at
the discretion of the repurchase investor. Under the terms of these agreements,
we pledged mortgage loans to obtain additional liquidity pending their sale.
Amounts outstanding under these agreements at April 30, 1999 and April 30, 1998
were $1.1 million and zero, respectively.
Our available credit lines also include Fannie Mae's "As Soon as
Pooled/Early Purchase Option" (the "ASAP Plus" program). Under the ASAP Plus
program, Fannie Mae funds us on the loans we deliver to them upon receipt of
appropriate mortgage collateral. Fannie Mae subsequently purchases the mortgage
loans for cash upon receipt of complete and accurate mortgage pool and other
documentation. While approximately 66% of loans funded by Monument Mortgage in
fiscal 1999 were sold to Fannie Mae, we have not used the ASAP Plus program
since Fannie Mae reinstituted our eligibility on February 1, 1999 after a period
of ineligibility due to our financial condition and management structure.
On June 3, 1999, we signed a letter of intent with GMAC/RFC for a
$75 million committed revolving warehouse facility. Our new facility will
replace our existing $35 million extended facility with GMAC/RFC, which we will
continue to use until the new facility is available; we received an extension of
our current facility which expires on August 9, 1999. The new facility may be
used for the origination or acquisition of residential mortgage loans and
expires 364 days from closing. The facility is secured by mortgage loans, which
it funds. Funds borrowed under the facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%.
Our facility agreement contains a number of covenants that, among other things,
require us to maintain a minimum current ratio, a minimum ratio of total
liabilities to tangible net worth and maintain a minimum level of tangible net
worth. The letter of intent agreement also contains covenants that limit our
ability to:
- change executive management;
- transfer or sell assets;
- rapidly grow liabilities;
- pay dividends;
36
<PAGE>
- enter into transactions with our affiliates; or
- enter into a merger, consolidate or sell substantially all of our assets.
Our revolving warehouse facility provides for events of default typical of
facilities of its type.
Cash used in financing activities was $26.6 million for fiscal 1999.
Increased net repayments of warehouse borrowings, repayments of other debt, the
partial redemption of our convertible subordinated debentures and the redemption
of our preferred stock were offset by the issuance of convertible debt and the
issuance of common stock through private placements and through warrant
exercises.
In May 1998, we received $1.4 million, net of expenses, from the issuance of
the final tranche of our 3% Convertible Subordinated Debenture private
placement. In September 1998, we issued 250 shares of our Series A Preferred
Stock in a private placement generating $2.3 million of proceeds, net of
expenses.
During fiscal 1999, we received $27.8 million from the issuance of common
stock in private placements. The proceeds were used to repay debt and other
obligations, to redeem $1.5 million of our 3% Subordinated Convertible
Debentures, to redeem $2.5 million of our Series A Preferred Stock and to fund
operations.
The net proceeds of private placements of common stock completed in the
first quarter of fiscal 2000, approximately $43.0 million, together with cash
flows from operations, our existing cash balances and funds available under our
revolving warehouse facilities and Fannie Mae ASAP Program, are expected to be
sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements for the next 12 months. We do,
however, expect to continue our expansion and expect that eventually we will
need to arrange for additional sources of capital through the issuance of debt
or equity or additional warehouse facilities. We have no commitments for any
additional financings, and we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain any
such additional financing at the times required and on terms and conditions
acceptable to us. In such event, our growth could slow and operations could be
adversely affected.
See also Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
Investing activities provided cash of $875,000, consisting primarily of a
reduction in the balance of mortgage servicing rights through sales of
$1.5 million in fiscal 1999. We do not intend to purchase additional mortgage
servicing rights and have entered into agreements to sell our remaining
servicing rights portfolios. These sales will generate cash for general
operating purposes.
Our capital expenditures totaled $819,000 for fiscal 1999. We expect our
level of capital spending for fiscal 2000 to increase significantly as we
improve our information systems investments to support our infrastructure and
ensure we are Year 2000 compliant.
POTENTIAL FOR NASDAQ DELISTING
There are several requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap
Market ("Nasdaq"), including a minimum stock price of $1.00 per share. If our
common share price closes below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive days, we may
receive notification from Nasdaq that our common stock will be delisted from the
Nasdaq unless the stock closes at or above $1.00 per share for at least 10
consecutive days during the 90 day period following such notification.
Delisting from the Nasdaq and inclusion of our common stock on the OTC
Bulletin Board or similar quotation system could adversely affect the liquidity
and price of our common stock and make it more difficult for investors to obtain
quotations or trade this stock.
In December 1998, we received notice from Nasdaq that we had not met
required financial ratio criteria for continued listing on the Nasdaq. Nasdaq
requested that we maintain a minimum net worth of $2 million and complete and
submit for its review certain periodic financial reporting until July 1999.
Nasdaq could initiate delisting procedures if we fail to comply. We have
subsequently complied and intend to comply with all special financial reporting
requests and ratio criteria required by Nasdaq.
37
<PAGE>
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
The Year 2000 issue concerns the ability of automated applications to
process date-dependent processes, calculations and information by properly
interpreting the year. The year 2000 issue could potentially impact our
business-critical computerized applications relating to, among others, loan
origination, servicing, pipeline management, hedging, payroll, financing and
financial accounting and reporting. In addition, other non business-critical
systems and services may also be affected. We have assembled a project team
composed of consultants, executive personnel and personnel from the information
systems, operations and finance departments to:
- assess the readiness of our systems, and the systems of our vendors and
suppliers, third-party service providers, customers and financial
institutions;
- replace or correct through program changes all our non-compliant
applications; and
- develop contingency plans in the event that systems and services are not
compliant.
The readiness assessment phase of the project is complete and consisted of a
detailed assessment and testing of substantially all internal computer systems.
In addition, we have received, or are seeking, documentation from many external
parties indicating their year 2000 readiness. Because our loan processing and
accounting software are more than two years old and have not been certified as
year 2000 compliant, we expect to spend up to $1.6 million on new software,
consultants and staff to replace these key systems. In addition, we expect to
spend up to $560,000 on testing and remedying our desktop computers and network.
We do not expect any additional costs of making our computer systems year 2000
compliant.
The actual cost to become year 2000 compliant is subject to certain risks
and uncertainties including, among others, our ability to timely identify all
affected business-critical systems, and the readiness of service providers,
vendors and suppliers, financial institutions and significant customers. We have
not been required to defer any information technology projects due to the year
2000 issue. If we are unsuccessful in correcting our business-critical systems
and processes affected by the year 2000 issue, our results of operations or
financial condition could be materially affected. If our service providers,
vendors and suppliers or our financial institutions and significant customers
are adversely affected by the year 2000 issue, our operations could face
substantial interruptions and our business and financial condition could be
materially and adversely affected. These third party risks include possible
interruptions in our ability to fund loans utilizing our warehouse facilities,
our ability to sell loans to Fannie Mae and other investors, our ability to
originate mortgages over the Internet and our hedging systems' ability to link
to financial data. We have contacted each of these parties and are seeking
assurance from them that their systems are year 2000 compliant.
Although we are in the process of developing contingency plans, in the event
our key service providers, vendors or suppliers experience year 2000 issues,
such contingency plans may not be effective. We do not expect the cost of
developing such plans to exceed $100,000, although no assurance to that effect
can be given.
38
<PAGE>
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE PERFORMANCE
IF WE CONTINUE TO EXPERIENCE LOSSES IN THE FUTURE, OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND GROWTH PROSPECTS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
We have had net losses in each fiscal year since fiscal 1997, and we expect
that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future on both an
annual and quarterly basis. We expect to continue to incur losses because of our
plans to invest over the near term in information systems, sales and marketing,
recruiting and training, customer support and administrative infrastructure.
Because of these expected losses, we may not be able to implement our business
plans, and our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth
prospects could be materially adversely affected.
As of April 30, 1999, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately
$47.9 million. Prior to December 31, 1995, our year-end financial statements
contained a qualification from our independent accountants regarding the
uncertainty of our ability to continue as a going concern. We believe that it is
likely that we will experience losses and accumulate deficits for the
foreseeable future.
WE MAY INCUR ADDITIONAL LOSSES FROM THE DISCONTINUED BUSINESSES OF COASTAL
FEDERAL MORTGAGE AND MICAL MORTGAGE.
In April 1998, we acquired Coastal Federal Mortgage Company, and in
May 1998, we acquired Mical Mortgage Inc., both of which have incurred losses
since we acquired them. In April 1999, we discontinued our Coastal and Mical
business units, and we substantially liquidated their assets. We recorded a
special charge to operations of approximately $4.2 million associated with these
discontinued units. We reported a net loss associated with their acquisition and
operation of $16.9 million in fiscal 1999. We may incur additional unanticipated
losses in connection with these discontinued business units.
IF OUR NEW MANAGEMENT IS NOT ABLE TO IMPROVE AND EXPAND OUR OPERATIONS, OUR
BUSINESS COULD SUFFER.
We recently replaced most of our management team by hiring, among others,
Mark Korell, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Gary Palmer, our
Executive Vice President--Chief Financial Officer, Michael Conway, our Executive
Vice President--Capital Markets, Thomas Porter, our Executive Vice
President--Administration, Kevin Gillespie, our Executive Vice President--Sales
and Marketing, and Chris Skeadas, our Executive Vice President--Chief Technology
Officer. These employees have not previously worked together, and we cannot be
sure that they will be able to work together effectively to improve and expand
our operations. If these employees are not able to improve and expand our
operations, our financial condition, profitability and growth prospects could be
materially adversely affected.
THE LOSS OF ANY OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OR KEY PERSONNEL WOULD LIKELY HAVE AN
ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS.
We believe that our future success will depend to a significant extent on
the continued services of our senior management and other key personnel,
including, among others: Mark Korell, Gary Palmer, Michael Conway, Thomas
Porter, Kevin Gillespie and Chris Skeadas. We do not maintain "key person" life
insurance for any of our personnel. The loss of the services of any of these
employees, or other key employees, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RETAIN AND ATTRACT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL, OUR BUSINESS COULD
SUFFER.
Our ability to grow and our future success depend on our ability to
identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate other highly skilled
technical, managerial, sales and marketing, customer service
39
<PAGE>
and professional personnel. Competition for such employees is intense,
especially in the e-commerce sector, and there is a risk that we will not be
able to successfully attract, assimilate or retain sufficiently qualified
personnel. If we fail to retain and attract the necessary technical, managerial,
sales and marketing, customer service personnel and experienced professionals,
our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially
adversely effected.
IF CONSUMERS AND MORTGAGE BROKER BUSINESSES DO NOT EMBRACE ON-LINE MORTGAGE
FINANCING AND SALES, OUR BUSINESS WILL BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
Our success depends upon the acceptance of on-line mortgage financing by
consumers, mortgage brokers and other real estate service providers. If these
groups do not embrace our model for mortgage finance, our business, results of
operations and financial condition will be materially adversely affected. The
market for electronic mortgage financing, particularly over the Internet, is at
an early stage of development and is evolving rapidly. Rapid growth in the use
of and interest in the Internet is a recent development and we cannot be sure
Internet usage will continue to grow or that a sufficiently broad base of
consumers and businesses will adopt, and continue to use, the Internet as a
medium by which to communicate and obtain services traditionally provided in
person-to-person and paper transactions. Our business prospects must be
considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently
encountered by companies in the new and rapidly evolving market for Internet
products and services.
We believe that acceptance of our products and services will depend on the
following factors, among others:
- the growth of the Internet as a medium for commerce generally, and as a
market for financial products and services in particular;
- development of the necessary Internet network infrastructure to support
new technologies and handle the demands placed upon the Internet;
- government regulation of the Internet;
- our ability to successfully and efficiently develop on-line products and
services that are attractive to a sufficiently large number of consumers
and mortgage brokers; and
- a change in the perception among many consumers and real estate service
providers that obtaining a mortgage on-line is less dependable than
obtaining a mortgage through a more traditional method.
There is a risk that on-line mortgage financing will not gain market
acceptance and that consumers will not significantly increase their use of the
Internet for obtaining loans. If the market for on-line mortgage financing fails
to develop, or develops more slowly than expected, our business, results of
operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected. In
addition, if there are insufficient communications services to support the
Internet, it could result in slower response times which would adversely affect
usage of the Internet. Even if the Internet gains acceptance, we may be unable,
for technical or other reasons, to develop and introduce new products and
services or enhancements of existing products and services in a timely manner,
and such products and services and enhancements may not gain widespread market
acceptance. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, because the market for on-line mortgage lending is at an early
stage of development, the volume of loans that we originate or sell in any given
period is difficult to predict. If the volume of loans that we originate or sell
falls below our expectations or the expectations of financial analysts, our
business, results of operation and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.
40
<PAGE>
IF THERE IS A RECESSION, NATURAL DISASTER OR OTHER DISRUPTION IN THE CALIFORNIA
ECONOMY, OUR BUSINESS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
Approximately 87% of Monument's loans that we originated and/or funded in
fiscal 1999 were for properties located in California. No other state
represented more than 6% of our loan volume during such period. Because a high
concentration of our business is in California, we are particularly vulnerable
to recessions and conditions affecting the economy of California. Although we
seek to originate more loans in other states, we are likely to continue to be
dependent on originating loans for properties located in California for the
foreseeable future. There have been times in the past, most recently in 1991 and
1992, when the California economy suffered a recession more severe than the rest
of the country. If such a recession were to occur again, our business, results
of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
In addition, California historically has been vulnerable to natural
disasters, such as earthquakes and mudslides, which are not typically covered by
standard hazard insurance policies that homeowners typically maintain. Uninsured
disasters may reduce a borrower's ability to repay the mortgage loans we close
and sell. A sustained period of increased delinquencies or defaults resulting
from natural disasters could adversely affect the pricing of our future loan
sales and our overall ability to sell loans. The occurrence of any such natural
disasters in California could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
IF THERE IS A DECREASE IN THE DEMAND FOR MORTGAGES, OUR BUSINESS COULD SUFFER.
Demand for mortgages is typically adversely affected by periods of economic
slowdown or recession, which can be accompanied by rising interest rates and
declining demand for consumer credit, home sales, real estate values and ability
of borrowers to make loan payments. These factors tend to decrease demand for
mortgage loans of the types we originate and could increase the rates of
delinquencies and foreclosures on loans we hold. These changes would likely have
a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Over the last several years we have operated in an environment of relatively
low interest rates, relatively high demand for consumer credit and increasing
home sales and real estate values. We cannot be sure that we will be able to
grow our business in an atmosphere of higher interest rates, lower consumer
credit demand and real estate value and fewer home sales.
IF INTEREST RATES RISE, OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY
AFFECTED.
Our residential mortgage business depends upon overall levels of sale and
refinancing of residential real estate as well as on mortgage loan interest
rates. Any fluctuation in interest rates or an adverse change in residential
real estate or general economic conditions, both of which are outside our
control, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. The residential real estate industry is
highly cyclical. Shifts in the economy and residential real estate values
generally affect the number of home sales and new housing starts. The demand for
mortgage loan financing increases as the number of home sales increases.
Declining interest rates generally increase mortgage loan financing activity
because homeowners refinance existing mortgage loans to obtain more favorable
interest rates. Rising interest rates, in contrast, discourage refinancing
activities and generally reduce the number of home sales that occur.
Approximately 69% of the loans we originated and/or funded in fiscal 1999
were loans to refinance mortgage debt. The effect of interest rate changes tends
to be greater on the market for refinancing loans than it is on the market for
purchase loans, since refinancing a mortgage loan is voluntary and motivated
primarily by a homeowner's desire to lower financing costs, whereas new home
purchasers are motivated by a need or desire for a new home. Accordingly, the
annual volume of new mortgage
41
<PAGE>
refinance loans is quite volatile. We cannot predict future interest rate
trends, their impact on our business, or our ability to manage this business
mix.
The value of the loans we make is based, in part, on market interest rates,
and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be
materially adversely affected if interest rates change rapidly or unexpectedly.
If interest rates rise after we fix a price for a loan but before we sell the
loan into the secondary market, the value of that loan will decrease. If we
delay in selling our loans into the secondary market, our interest rate exposure
increases and we could incur a loss on the sale. While we use various hedging
strategies to provide some protection against interest rate risks, no hedging
strategy can protect us completely. The nature and timing of hedging
transactions influences the effectiveness of hedging strategies and poorly
designed strategies or improperly executed transactions may increase rather than
decrease risk. In addition, hedging strategies involve transaction and other
costs. There is a risk that our hedging strategy and the hedges that we make
will not adequately offset the risks of interest rate volatility and that our
hedges will result in losses.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE OURSELVES FROM COMPETITION IN OUR INDUSTRY,
OUR BUSINESS PROSPECTS COULD BE HARMED.
The e-commerce market is new, rapidly evolving and intensely competitive. We
expect competition to intensify in the future. Barriers to entry are minimal, so
our competitors can launch new Internet sites at relatively low cost. In
addition, the residential mortgage loan business is highly competitive. We
currently compete with a variety of other companies offering mortgage services,
including:
- various on-line mortgage brokers, including E-LOAN Inc., iOwn.com,
Mortgage.com, Quicken Mortgage.com and Keystroke Financial;
- mortgage companies that offer products through on-line search engines,
such as Yahoo! and Microsoft Corporation's Home Advisor website;
- mortgage banking companies, commercial banks, savings associations, credit
unions and other financial institutions which still originate the vast
majority of mortgage loans; and
- mortgage brokers.
Many of our mortgage banking and mortgage brokerage competitors have longer
operating histories or significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and
other resources than we do. Some of our on-line competitors are spending
substantial funds on mass marketing and branding their mortgage services. In
addition, some of our competitors offer a wider range of services and financial
products to customers and have the ability to respond more quickly to new or
changing opportunities. As a result, many have greater name recognition and more
extensive customer bases and can offer more attractive terms to customers and
adopt more aggressive loan pricing policies. We cannot be sure that we will be
able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. If we are
unable to do so it will have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
IF OUR QUARTERLY REVENUES AND OPERATING RESULTS FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY, THE
PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK IS LIKELY TO BE VOLATILE.
Our quarterly revenues and operating results are likely to continue to vary
substantially from quarter to quarter. Fluctuation in our quarterly results may
cause the price of our common stock to be volatile. We believe that the
following factors, among others, could affect our quarterly results:
- fluctuations in mortgage loan interest rates;
- seasonal or other economic factors affecting demand for mortgage credit;
- the volume of our mortgage loan originations;
42
<PAGE>
- the size and timing of our loan sales;
- our ability to offer competitive mortgage rates;
- changes in our pricing policies or our competitors' pricing policies for
mortgage origination and processing fees;
- the proportion of our mortgage originations which are used to purchase
homes or refinance existing debt;
- the introduction of new products and services by us or our competitors;
- the level of consumer interest and confidence in the Internet as a means
of accessing financial products and services;
- the timing of releases of enhancements to our products and services;
- our ability to upgrade and develop our information systems and operational
infrastructure to accommodate growth;
- the timing and rate at which we increase our expenses to support projected
growth;
- the cost of compliance with federal and state government laws and
regulations, including any changes in our historic business practices that
could result from legal interpretations;
- any termination or restructuring of any strategic alliances or agreements
with key service providers, such as the Federal National Mortgage
Association, commonly known as Fannie Mae, or the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation, commonly known as Freddie Mac;
- our announcement of new marketing initiatives or strategic alliances with
other Internet-based companies, or termination of any such initiative or
alliance;
- the volume of business resulting from collaborative marketing efforts with
our strategic partners;
- technical difficulties or service interruptions affecting our Internet
websites or operational data processing systems;
- changes in our operating expenses and investment in our infrastructure;
- general economic conditions in the United States and economic conditions
which particularly affect e-commerce industries; and
- additions or departures of key executives and operating personnel.
These factors make a substantial decline in our stock price possible at any
time. For example, our common stock traded between $0.41 and $18.25 per share
between May 1, 1998 and June 30, 1999.
In addition, the trading prices of Internet and e-commerce stocks have
recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations
often appear to be unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
Internet and e-commerce companies. The valuations of many Internet and
e-commerce stocks are extraordinarily high based on conventional valuation
standards such as price-to-earnings and price-to-sales ratios. These trading
prices and valuations may not be sustained. Any negative change in the public's
perception of the prospects of Internet or e-commerce companies could depress
our stock price regardless of our results. In the past, securities class action
litigation often has been brought against companies following declines in the
market price of their securities. If litigation of this type were brought
against us, it could be very costly and could divert management's attention and
resources from our business plan.
We anticipate that as the on-line mortgage origination industry matures, our
business will also be increasingly susceptible to the same seasonal and cyclical
factors that affect the mortgage industry as a
43
<PAGE>
whole. Accordingly, we believe period-to-period comparisons of our operating
results are not meaningful and our results for any period should not be relied
upon as an indication of future performance. Our operating results may fail to
meet our expectations or those of analysts who follow us. Any such failure could
cause our stock price to decline substantially.
We are aware that from time to time chat groups may develop on the Internet
and that participants in those groups may post statements about us. These
statements may influence the market price of our common stock. We do not monitor
statements about us that appear on the Internet, except for authorized
statements made by us. We undertake no obligation of any kind whatsoever to
monitor, correct, comment on or respond to statements on the Internet or
elsewhere by others, and it is our policy not to monitor, correct, comment on or
respond to such statements.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO MANAGE GROWTH IN OUR BUSINESS, OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MAY
NOT IMPROVE.
We anticipate that we will need to rapidly expand our employee base,
facilities and infrastructure in order to be able to compete successfully and
take advantage of market opportunities. We expect this expansion to place
significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. Our
current personnel, systems, procedures and controls are not adequate to support
anticipated growth of our operations. To manage this expected growth, we will
need to improve our mortgage processing, operational and financial systems,
information processing capacity, procedures and controls. We may be unable to
hire, train, retain or manage necessary personnel, or to identify and take
advantage of existing and potential strategic relationships and market
opportunities. If we are unable to manage expansion of our business effectively,
our business, results of operations and financial condition may not improve and
could deteriorate.
PROBLEMS AND RISKS RELATED TO POTENTIAL ACQUISITIONS AND ALLIANCES MAY HARM OUR
BUSINESS.
Our growth strategy includes acquisitions of or alliances with companies
with complementary services, technologies and businesses. In connection with any
such acquisition, we may fail to successfully integrate the operations of the
acquired company. For example, as described more completely above under "We may
incur additional losses from the discontinued businesses of Coastal Federal
Mortgage and Mical Mortgage," we incurred significant losses following our
acquisitions of Mical and Coastal, and have discontinued their operations. Any
future acquisitions or alliances we pursue may not be completed or successful.
Also, acquisitions or alliances could divert our management's attention from
other business matters, or we could lose key employees of acquired companies or
alliance businesses.
IF WE LOSE KEY MORTGAGE LENDER RELATIONSHIPS, OUR BUSINESS COULD BE MATERIALLY
ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
We rely on lenders to make loans in cases where we act as a broker. These
lenders are under no obligation to continue their relationships with us or to
make a loan to any potential borrower we present to them. Approximately 65% of
the loans we originated in fiscal 1999 were closed by five lenders. Our reliance
on a small group of lenders makes our origination volume more susceptible to
changes in the rates, services and products such lenders offer. The loss of our
relationship with any of these lenders, or the failure of these lenders to offer
competitive terms, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
THE DISCONTINUATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS THAT PURCHASE LOANS OR ANY CHANGE IN OUR
ELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN SUCH PROGRAMS WOULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT
ON OUR BUSINESS.
We fund our mortgage loan operations in part by selling the mortgage loans
that we fund to entities such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Government
National Mortgage Association, commonly known as Ginnie Mae, which pool those
mortgage loans into mortgage-backed securities. Our ability to sell mortgage
loans depends upon the continuation of programs administered by these
44
<PAGE>
entities, as well as our continued eligibility to participate in these programs.
If these programs, or our eligibility to participate in them, were terminated or
significantly curtailed, our business, results of operations and financial
condition would be materially adversely affected. In addition, the mortgage
products offered under these federal programs may change from time to time. The
profitability of specific mortgage products may vary depending on a number of
factors, including our administrative costs of originating these products.
We also depend upon private mortgage investors, such as GMAC/RFC, GE Capital
Mortgage and IndyMac, to purchase mortgage loans that we originate which do not
qualify for inclusion in the federal programs described above. If private
investors reduce their purchases of these mortgage loans, the market and price
for such mortgage loans will be adversely affected, which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on automated underwriting and other services offered by government
sponsored and other mortgage investors, including Fannie Mae's Desktop
Underwriter, or DU, Freddie Mac's Loan Prospector, GMAC/RFC's AssetWise and GE
Capital Mortgage's Good Decisions. These services help ensure that our mortgage
services can be offered efficiently and timely. We currently have an agreement
with Fannie Mae that allows us to use their automated underwriting services and
enables us to sell qualified first mortgages to Fannie Mae. During fiscal 1999,
approximately 66% of loans funded by Monument Mortgage were sold to Fannie Mae.
We expect to continue to process a significant portion of our conforming loans
using the Fannie Mae system. However, our agreements with Fannie Mae and other
mortgage investors can be terminated by either party immediately upon the
delivery of a written termination notice. There is a risk that we will not
remain in good standing with Fannie Mae and other mortgage investors or that
Fannie Mae and other mortgage investors will terminate our relationship. The
termination of our agreement with Fannie Mae would materially adversely impact
our ability to originate loans.
IF OUR NEW MARKETING RELATIONSHIPS ARE UNSUCCESSFUL, OUR LOAN ORIGINATIONS COULD
SUFFER.
We have entered into a majority of our marketing relationships within the
past four months. We expect our new marketing relationships to direct a
significant number of prospective customers to our websites. Our agreements with
marketing partners are typically short term, lasting as little as 90 days, and,
in some cases, can be unilaterally terminated by either party. If any of these
agreements were terminated or lapsed without extension, we could lose an
important new source of loan applications.
Among our new marketing relationships are those with Ask.com,
CoxInteractive, GetSmart.com, Homehunter, Homeseekers and XOOM.com. If our
relationship with these marketing partners or future marketing partners are not
successful, or if they are successful but are discontinued for any reason, we
could experience a material reduction in the number of loans we are able to
originate. We cannot predict whether any or all of these agreements will be
terminated or will be renewed or extended past their current expiration dates.
In addition, if we fail to establish relationships with future website operators
or to anticipate and make adjustments in our marketing strategy to access other
potential customers, our business, results of operations and financial condition
could be materially adversely affected.
IF WE HAVE TO REPURCHASE LOANS ORIGINATED FOR OR SOLD TO LENDERS, OUR OPERATING
RESULTS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
Under agreements with some of our lenders, they may require us to repurchase
loans that we originate for them, or they purchase from us, in the event of
material misrepresentations by us or inaccuracies in the borrowers' loan
documents. In fiscal 1999, we were required to repurchase approximately $0,
$9.9 million and $124,000 principal amount of loans sold by Coastal, Mical and
Monument Mortgage, respectively. It is possible that future demands will be made
to repurchase loans sold by these subsidiaries. There is a risk that we will not
have sufficient funds to repurchase loans
45
<PAGE>
upon demand or that such repurchases will have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
As a result of repurchases, we occasionally are required to hold foreclosed
residential real estate in inventory until it can be resold. If interest rates
rise and the economy declines, the rate of mortgage loan foreclosures may rise.
Depending on the circumstances of the transaction, we may or may not be able to
sell the property for more than the outstanding loan balance. As of April 30,
1999, our Mical Mortgage subsidiary held approximately $1 million aggregate
principal amount of loans in foreclosure. Future foreclosures could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
IF WE LOSE ACCESS TO CREDIT FACILITIES TO FINANCE OUR MORTGAGE LENDING
ACTIVITIES, OUR GROWTH PROSPECTS COULD BE SEVERELY LIMITED.
We act as a lender for many of the loans we originate. Because we are not a
bank, we are dependent upon specialized mortgage credit facilities from other
lenders to finance our mortgage lending activities. We previously maintained
warehouse credit facilities with Residential Funding Corporation, and at times,
we have defaulted under such lines of credit. These warehouse lines have
expired; however, we were granted monthly extensions on one of these lines. The
current monthly extension under this line ends on August 9, 1999.
We cannot assure you that financing will continue to be available on
favorable terms or at all. To the extent that we are unable to access adequate
capital to fund loans, we may have to curtail or cease our loan funding
activities entirely. This would have a material adverse effect on our ability to
execute our growth and operating strategies as well as on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
IF THERE ARE INTERRUPTIONS OR DELAYS IN OBTAINING APPRAISAL, CREDIT REPORTING,
TITLE SEARCHING AND OTHER UNDERWRITING SERVICES FROM THIRD PARTIES, WE MAY
EXPERIENCE CUSTOMER DISSATISFACTION AND DIFFICULTIES CLOSING LOANS.
We rely on other companies to perform certain aspects of the loan
underwriting process, including appraisals, credit reporting and title searches.
If the provision of these ancillary services were interrupted or delayed, it
could cause delays in the processing and closing of loans for our customers. The
value of the service we offer and the ultimate success of our business are
dependent on our ability to secure the timely provision of these ancillary
services by the third parties with whom we have business relationships. If we
are unsuccessful in securing the timely delivery of these ancillary services we
will likely experience increased customer dissatisfaction and our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely
affected.
IF WE FAIL TO COMPLY WITH EXTENSIVE FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REGULATING OUR
INDUSTRY, WE COULD BE SUBJECT TO PENALTIES, DISQUALIFICATIONS, LAWSUITS OR
ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS THAT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE AFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation by federal and state
authorities. For example, the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development, or HUD, regulates certain aspects of the mortgage lending business,
as do the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Trade Commission. The Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974, or RESPA, the Truth in Lending Act and
federal statutes require that certain disclosures, such as good faith estimates
of settlement charges, a Truth-in-Lending Statement and a HUD-1 settlement
statement be provided to borrowers and that certain information, such as the HUD
Settlement Costs booklet, also be provided to borrowers. The Federal Fair
Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibit discrimination and
various state statutes prohibit unfair and deceptive trade practices, and impose
disclosure and other
46
<PAGE>
requirements in connection with the mortgage loan origination process. If we
fail to comply with such regulations, possible consequences could include loss
of approved status, demands for indemnification, class action lawsuits, and
administrative enforcement actions.
In addition, RESPA contains certain prohibitions regarding the giving or
taking of a fee, kickback, or anything of value for the referral of business to
any specific person or organization. However, the payment of reasonable
compensation for the provision of goods, services and facilities is generally
not prohibited.
In September 1998, HUD cited Mical for various alleged violations of HUD/FHA
regulations. Thereafter, HUD withdrew Mical's HUD/FHA Title I & II approvals and
imposed a civil penalty against Mical in the amount of $500,000.
In California, regulation and licensing of mortgage brokers and lenders
falls under the California Department of Real Estate or the California
Department of Corporations. Other than banking industry employees and other
persons who are exempt from California Department of Real Estate and California
Department of Corporations licensing requirements, individuals engaged directly
in the origination of loans or the dissemination of certain information are
required to be licensed by the California Department of Real Estate or the
California Department of Corporations. We and some of our subsidiaries are also
required to be licensed in other states in which we have offices or operate.
Although we have the licenses required in California and several other states
and believe that we will be able to obtain licenses required in other states
from time to time, we cannot be sure that we will successfully comply with the
many government regulations and licensing requirements to which we are subject.
If we fail to comply adequately, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
IF LEGISLATION OR REGULATION SURROUNDING THE USE OF THE INTERNET RESTRICTS OUR
ABILITY TO ORIGINATE MORTGAGES OVER THE INTERNET, OUR BUSINESS WOULD BE
MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
Laws and regulations directly applicable to the Internet and e-commerce may
become more prevalent in the future. In the event the Federal Trade Commission
or other governmental authorities adopt or modify laws or regulations relating
to the Internet, our business, results of operations and financial condition
could be materially adversely affected. Such legislation and regulation could
dampen the growth in Internet usage generally and decrease the acceptance of the
Internet as a commercial medium. The laws and regulations governing the Internet
remain largely unsettled, even in areas where there has been some legislative or
regulatory action. It may take years to determine whether and how existing laws
and regulations such as those governing intellectual property, privacy and
taxation apply to the Internet. In addition, the growth and development of the
market for e-commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection
laws and regulations, both in the United States and abroad, that may impose
additional burdens on companies conducting business over the Internet.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RESPOND TO RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE IN E-COMMERCE AND
IMPROVE OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, OUR BUSINESS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY
AFFECTED.
The Internet and e-commerce are characterized by rapid technological change,
changes in user and customer requirements and preferences, frequent new product
and service introductions embodying new technologies and the emergence of new
industry standards and practices that could render existing technology and
systems obsolete. To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve
the responsiveness, functionality and features of our on-line services. We have
little proprietary computer software, information databases or applications. We
cannot be sure that others will not develop and offer superior products and
services, or, if so offered, that they will not gain a greater acceptance among
potential customers. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to both
license and internally develop leading technologies useful in our business,
enhance our existing services, develop
47
<PAGE>
new services and technology that address the increasingly sophisticated and
varied needs of our customers, and respond to technological advances and
emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis.
The development of websites and other proprietary technology entails
significant technical and business risks. There can be no assurance that we will
successfully use new technologies effectively or adapt our websites, technology
and transaction-processing systems to customer requirements or emerging industry
standards. If we are unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons,
to adapt in a timely manner to changing market conditions, customer requirements
or emerging industry standards, our business, results of operations and
financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
IF OUR COMPUTER SYSTEMS FAIL, OUR BUSINESS WOULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY
AFFECTED.
A key element of our strategy is to generate a high volume of traffic on,
and use of, our websites. Accordingly, the satisfactory performance, reliability
and availability of our websites, transaction-processing systems and network
infrastructure are critical to our reputation and ability to attract and retain
customers and maintain adequate customer service levels. Our revenues depend in
part on the number of potential customers who visit our websites. Any system
interruption that results in the unavailability of our websites would reduce the
volume and attractiveness of our product and service offerings. Our
communications hardware and some of our other computer hardware operations are
located at our facilities in Walnut Creek, California. The hardware for our
internal loan and product database, as well as our loan processing operations,
is also maintained in our Walnut Creek facility. Fires, floods, earthquakes,
power losses, telecommunications failures, breaches and similar events could
damage these systems. Computer viruses, electronic breaches or other similar
disruptive problems could also adversely affect our websites. Our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if our
systems were affected by any of these occurrences. Our insurance policies may
not adequately compensate us for losses that may occur in the event of a failure
of our computer systems or other interruptions in our business.
Our websites must accommodate a high volume of traffic and deliver
frequently updated information, the accuracy and timeliness of which is critical
to our business. In the past, we have experienced periodic system interruptions,
which we believe will continue to occur from time to time. Any substantial
increase in the volume of traffic on our websites will require us to expand and
upgrade further our technology, transaction-processing systems and network
infrastructure. We cannot be sure that we will be able to accurately project the
rate or timing of increases, if any, in the use of our websites or expand and
upgrade our systems and infrastructure to accommodate such increases in a timely
manner. In addition, our users depend on Internet service providers, on-line
service providers and other website operators for access to our websites. Many
of them have experienced significant outages in the past, and could experience
outage delays and other difficulties due to system failures unrelated to our
systems. Moreover, the Internet infrastructure may not be able to support
continued growth in its use. Any of these problems would materially adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
IF OUR ELECTRONIC SECURITY DEVICES ARE BREACHED, OUR BUSINESS WOULD BE
MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
The secure transmission of confidential information through e-commerce is
critical to our underwriting process. We rely on certain encryption and
authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide secure
transmission of confidential information, such as consumers' financial
statements. There can be no assurance that advances in computer capabilities,
new discoveries in the field of cryptography, or other events or developments
will not result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms we use to protect
customer transaction data. If any such compromise were to occur, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
48
<PAGE>
We may be required to spend significant capital and other resources to
protect against such security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such
breaches. Concerns over the security of transactions conducted on the Internet
and the privacy of users may also inhibit the growth of the Internet generally,
and e-commerce in particular. To the extent that our activities involve the
storage and transmission of proprietary information, such as consumers'
financial statements and profile information, security breaches could damage our
reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability.
There can be no assurance that our security measures will prevent security
breaches or that a failure to prevent such security breaches will not have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY ADDRESS YEAR 2000 ISSUES, OUR BUSINESS COULD BE
MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
Many currently installed computer systems and software programs only accept
two digits to identify the year in any date. Any system or program which cannot
accept four digits to identify the year in any date may not distinguish dates
falling on or after January 1, 2000 from dates falling before January 1, 2000.
As a result, many computer systems and software programs may need to be upgraded
or replaced to ensure they comply with Year 2000 requirements.
The actual cost we incur to become Year 2000 compliant is subject to certain
risks and uncertainties including, among others, our ability to timely identify
all affected business-critical systems, and the readiness of service providers,
vendors and suppliers, and our financial institutions and significant customers.
If we are unsuccessful in correcting our business-critical systems and processes
affected by the Year 2000 issue, our, business, results of operations and
financial condition could be materially affected. In addition, if our service
providers, vendors and suppliers or our financial institutions and significant
customers are adversely affected by the Year 2000 issue, our operations could
face substantial interruptions and our business, results of operations and
financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. These third
party risks include possible interruptions in our ability to fund loans
utilizing our warehouse facilities, our ability to sell loans to Fannie Mae and
other investors, originate mortgages over the Internet and our hedging systems'
ability to link to financial data.
FUTURE ISSUANCES OF ADDITIONAL SECURITIES WILL BE DILUTIVE TO EXISTING
STOCKHOLDERS.
Pursuant to contractual obligations to file a registration statement with
the SEC covering shares of common stock held by some of our existing
stockholders, we may be obligated to issue additional shares to such
stockholders for failing to file the registration statement within the time
specified in the agreements under which the shares were purchased. If we are
required to issue such additional shares, it will result in dilution to the
interests of our other stockholders.
In addition, Mr. Korell's employment agreement has an anti-dilution
provision pursuant to which he has the right to maintain a four percent equity
position in FiNet.com. The issuance of options to Mr. Korell pursuant to this
provision will result in dilution to the interests of our other stockholders.
MATERIAL SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to April 30, 1999, we received approximately $43.0 million from
the issuance of approximately 11.0 million shares of our common stock in private
placements.
We received an extension of our lending agreement from our primary warehouse
lender, GMAC/ RFC. The extension expires on August 9, 1999.
49
<PAGE>
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSUE ABOUT MARKET RISK
FiNet's primary market risk of loss is interest rate risk. From the time we
extend an interest rate commitment to the borrower until the loan is priced for
sale to an investor, we are subject interest rate risk. If interest rates rise
during that period, the price at which the loan can be sold to an investor
declines, resulting in a loss on the sale of the loan. We attempt to mitigate
such losses and manage our interest rate risk exposure through hedging
transactions using a combination of forward sales of mortgage-backed securities
and forward whole-loan sales to fix the sales price of loans we expect to fund.
Before entering into hedging transactions, we analyze our loans with committed
interest rates (pipeline loans). We consider factors such as the estimated
portion of loans that will ultimately be funded, note rates, interest rates,
inventory of loans and applications and other factors to determine the type and
amount of forward commitment and hedging transactions.
FiNet attempts to make forward commitments for, or hedge substantially, all
of its estimated interest rate risk on the loans. We have mandatory and optional
forward commitments at April 30, 1999 and 1998 aggregating $43.8 million and
$46.4 million, respectively. These commitments covered the market risk
associated with mortgage loans held for sale to investors of $33.4 million and
$63.0 million, respectively, and our pipeline loans for which interest rates
were committed at April 30, 1999 and 1998 of $25.6 million and $87.3 million,
respectively. We attempt to limit our credit exposure on forward sales
arrangements by entering into forward sales contracts exclusively with
institutions that we believe are sound credit risks and by limiting exposure to
any single institution.
50
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Reports.......................................................... 52
Report of Management................................................................... 55
Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 30, 1999 and 1998................................. 56
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended April 30, 1999 and 1998 and
1997................................................................................. 57
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended April 30, 1999 and
1998 and 1997........................................................................ 58
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended April 30, 1999 and 1998...... 59
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................................. 60
</TABLE>
51
<PAGE>
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FiNet.com, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
FiNet.com, Inc., and subsidiaries as of April 30, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1999. These financial statements are
the responsibility of FiNet.com, Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of FiNet.com, Inc. at
April 30, 1999 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1999, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Francisco, California
June 11, 1999, except for Note 20, as to
which the date is June 28, 1999
52
<PAGE>
REUBEN E. PRICE & CO.
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
703 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
FiNet.com, Inc.
Walnut Creek, CA
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of FiNet.com,
Inc. (formerly Finet Holdings Corporation) and subsidiaries as of April 30,
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the fiscal years ended April 30, 1998 and 1997. The
consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the merger of
FiNet.com, Inc. and Coastal Federal Mortgage Company on April 30, 1998, which
has been accounted for using the pooling of interests method as described in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We did not audit the 1998 and 1997 financial statements of Coastal
Federal Mortgage Company, which statements reflect total assets and revenues of
approximately 10 percent and 53 percent, respectively, of the related
consolidated totals as of April 30, 1998. Those statements were audited by other
auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it
relates to data included for Coastal Federal Mortgage Company, is based solely
on the report of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the
consolidated statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of FiNet.com, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April
30, 1998, the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for
the fiscal years ended April 30, 1998 and 1997 in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ REUBEN E. PRICE & CO.
San Francisco, CA
August 12, 1998
53
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors
Coastal Federal Mortgage Company
We have audited the balance sheet of Coastal Federal Mortgage Company as of
April 30, 1998, and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the two year period then ended (not
presented separately herein). These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements enumerated above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Coastal Federal Mortgage
Company as of April 30, 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the years in the two year period then ended, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
July 9, 1998
With respect to Note C
July 31, 1998
54
<PAGE>
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
To Our Stockholders:
Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation, integrity and
objectivity of the consolidated financial statements, and the other financial
information presented in the annual report. To meet these responsibilities we
maintain a system of internal control that is designed to provide reasonable
assurance as to the integrity and reliability of the financial statements, the
protection of Company and customer assets from unauthorized use, and the
execution and recording of transactions in accordance with management's
authorization. The system is augmented by careful selection of our managers, by
organizational arrangements that provide an appropriate division of
responsibility and by communications programs aimed at assuming that employees
adhere to the highest standards of personal and professional integrity. Although
no cost-effective internal control system will preclude all errors and
irregularities, we believe the Company's system of internal control is adequate
to accomplish the objectives set forth above.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some amounts
that are based on estimates and our best judgments. The financial statements
have been audited by the independent accounting firm of Ernst & Young, LLP, who
were given unrestricted access to all the Company's financial records and
related data. We believe that all representations made to Ernst & Young LLP
during their audit were valid and appropriate.
The Board of Directors through its Audit Committee, which is comprised
entirely of nonmanagement directors, has an oversight role in the area of
financial reporting and internal control. The Audit Committee periodically meets
with Ernst & Young, LLP, our internal auditors and Company management to discuss
accounting, auditing, internal controls over financial reporting and other
matters.
55
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
APRIL 30
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents................................................................. $ 4,202 $ 1,993
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $2,150 and $36.................................. 2,245 26,186
Mortgages held for sale, net.............................................................. 33,438 63,034
Mortgage servicing rights................................................................. 2,693 5,478
Furniture, fixtures & equipment, net...................................................... 1,575 1,441
Other assets.............................................................................. 1,102 3,336
---------- ----------
Total assets............................................................................ $ 45,255 $ 101,468
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Warehouse and other lines of credit....................................................... $ 33,038 $ 86,659
Accounts payable.......................................................................... 517 2,951
Notes payable and capitalized leases...................................................... 481 860
Accrued expenses and other liabilities.................................................... 4,531 2,139
Convertible subordinated debentures....................................................... -- 5,500
---------- ----------
Total liabilities......................................................................... 38,567 98,109
Commitments and contingencies............................................................. -- --
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, par value $.01 per share (150,000 shares authorized, 78,638 and 32,052
shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively)................. 786 321
Additional paid-in capital................................................................ 53,782 13,675
Accumulated deficit....................................................................... (47,880) (10,637)
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity.............................................................. 6,688 3,359
---------- ----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity................................................ $ 45,255 $ 101,468
========== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
56
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
---------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues........................................................................ $ 22,413 $ 15,160 $ 12,344
Cost of revenues................................................................ 35,064 14,718 9,316
---------- --------- ---------
Gross profit.................................................................... (12,651) 442 3,028
Operating expenses
General and administrative.................................................... 11,661 5,887 4,451
Marketing and advertising..................................................... 2,205 921 667
Special charges (Note 13)..................................................... 4,926 1,010 --
Depreciation and amortization................................................. 646 482 105
Other......................................................................... 1,468 875 552
---------- --------- ---------
Total expenses.............................................................. 20,906 9,175 5,775
---------- --------- ---------
Loss from operations............................................................ (33,557) (8,733) (2,747)
Other interest expense.......................................................... 2,976 420 118
---------- --------- ---------
Loss before income taxes and extraordinary gain................................. (36,533) (9,153) (2,865)
Income tax expense.............................................................. 5 226 225
---------- --------- ---------
Loss before extraordinary gain.................................................. (36,538) (9,379) (3,090)
Extraordinary gain on liabilities subject to compromise......................... -- -- 312
---------- --------- ---------
Net loss........................................................................ (36,538) (9,379) (2,778)
In-substance preferred dividend................................................. 705 -- --
---------- --------- ---------
Net loss available to common stockholders....................................... $ (37,243) $ (9,379) $ (2,778)
========== ========= =========
Loss per share available to common stockholders:
Basic and diluted net loss per share before extraordinary item................ $ (0.79) $ (0.31) $ (0.21)
Extraordinary gain on liabilities subject to compromise....................... -- -- .02
---------- --------- ---------
Basic and diluted net loss per common share................................... $ (0.79) $ (0.31) $ (0.19)
========== ========= =========
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per
common share.................................................................. 46,867 30,433 14,313
========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
57
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK PAID COMMON RETAINED
--------------------------- IN STOCK EARNINGS TOTAL
SHARES AMOUNT SUBSCRIBED CAPITAL SUBSCRIPTION (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
------ ------ ---------- ------- ------------ --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance April 30, 1996............................ 9,650 $ 97 $ -- $ 1,478 $ -- $ 2,261 $ 3,836
Issue of common shares:
Common stock offerings.......................... 11,992 80 40 7,233 (2,693) -- 4,660
Reverse acquisition............................. 6,412 64 -- (3,455) -- -- (3,391)
Debt & note payable conversion.................. 2,314 23 -- 1,136 -- -- 1,159
Liabilities subject to compromise settlements... 230 2 -- 113 -- -- 115
Common stock rights............................. 2,403 24 -- (24) -- -- --
Stock option exercise........................... 3 -- -- -- -- -- --
Repurchase of common shares....................... (3,000) (30) -- (150) -- -- (180)
Distributions to stockholders..................... -- -- -- -- -- (741) (741)
Net loss.......................................... -- -- -- -- -- (2,778) (2,778)
------ ---- ---- ------- ------- -------- --------
Balance April 30, 1997............................ 30,004 260 40 6,331 (2,693) (1,258) 2,680
Proceeds of subscription receivable............... -- 40 (40) -- 2,693 -- 2,693
Issue of common shares:
In connection with acquisitions:
Real Estate Office Software................... 150 2 -- 373 -- -- 375
iQualify, Inc................................. 50 1 -- 180 -- -- 181
NDS........................................... 202 2 -- 806 -- -- 808
Private placement............................... 1,300 13 -- 3,887 -- -- 3,900
Settlement of liabilities....................... 232 2 -- 355 -- -- 357
Employee bonuses................................ 9 -- -- 35 -- -- 35
Warrants exercised................................ 105 1 -- 157 -- -- 158
Paid in capital related to imputed interest on
issue of convertible debt....................... -- -- -- 1,551 -- -- 1,551
Net loss.......................................... -- -- -- -- -- (9,379) (9,379)
------ ---- ---- ------- ------- -------- --------
Balance April 30, 1998............................ 32,052 321 -- 13,675 -- (10,637) 3,359
Issue of common shares:
Private placements of common shares............. 34,138 341 -- 28,196 -- -- 28,537
Costs of equity offerings....................... -- -- -- (762) -- -- (762)
In connection with acquisitions:
Mical Mortgage, Inc........................... 465 5 -- 1,798 -- -- 1,803
Interloan.com................................. 100 1 -- 74 -- -- 75
Real Estate Office Software................... 50 -- -- 246 -- -- 246
Conversion of convertible subordinated
debentures.................................... 9,533 95 -- 5,405 -- -- 5,500
Warrants exercised.............................. 1,122 11 -- 1,410 -- -- 1,421
Stock options exercised......................... 378 4 -- 22 -- -- 26
Employee/other compensation..................... 800 8 -- 1,120 -- -- 1,128
Paid in capital related to imputed interest on
issue of convertible debentures................. -- -- -- 423 -- -- 423
Paid in capital and in-substance dividend on
preferred stock................................. -- -- -- 705 -- (705) --
Warrants issued with subordinated convertible
debentures...................................... -- -- -- 269 -- -- 269
Warrants issued upon conversion of debentures..... -- -- -- 739 -- -- 739
Issue of preferred stock.......................... -- -- -- 2,500 -- -- 2,500
Costs of preferred stock issue.................... -- -- -- (214) -- -- (214)
Redemption of preferred stock..................... -- -- -- (2,500) -- -- (2,500)
Warrants issued for services...................... -- -- -- 676 -- -- 676
Net loss.......................................... -- -- -- -- -- (36,538) (36,538)
------ ---- ---- ------- ------- -------- --------
Balance April 30, 1999............................ 78,638 $786 $ -- $53,782 $ -- $(47,880) $ 6,688
====== ==== ==== ======= ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
58
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss....................................................................... $ (36,538) $ (9,379) $ (2,778)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization................................................ 2,476 1,549 543
Imputed interest from convertible debentures................................. 2,502 287 --
Write down of goodwill and other asset valuation adjustments................. 4,958 1,728 164
Gain on sale of mortgage servicing rights.................................... (420) -- --
Expenses paid by issuance of common stock or warrants........................ 1,804 392 52
Expense from warrants issued upon conversion of debentures................... 739 -- --
Extraordinary gain on liabilities subject to compromise...................... -- -- (312)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in mortgage loans held for sale.......................... 71,596 (38,562) (6,130)
(Increase) decrease in receivables from sales of mortgage loans, servicing
rights and other receivables............................................... 23,911 (20,496) 8,412
(Increase) decrease in originated mortgage servicing rights.................. 382 (1,248) (876)
(Increase) decrease in other assets.......................................... 724 317 (498)
Net increase (decrease) in warehouse borrowings.............................. (91,494) 58,357 (345)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses................. (6,175) 3,006 106
Other operating.............................................................. 309 (229) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in operating activities...................................... (25,226) (4,278) (1,662)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of mortgage servicing rights.......................................... -- (4,515) (287)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights................................ 1,509 497 --
Acquisition of mortgage loans held for investment.............................. -- -- (87)
Purchase of furniture, fixtures and equipment.................................. (338) (647) (265)
Acquisition of purchased technology and intangibles............................ (481) (1,007) (67)
Cash acquired in acquisition................................................... 185 -- --
Pre-acquisition advances to affiliates, net of payments........................ -- (1,930) (717)
Other.......................................................................... -- 110 234
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities........................ 875 (7,492) (1,189)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock......................................... 27,775 6,582 4,438
Proceeds from issuance of convertible preferred stock.......................... 2,286 -- --
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt..................................... 1,384 5,058 --
Repurchase of common stock..................................................... -- -- (180)
Proceeds from advances on note payable and line of credit...................... 1,400 2,550 1,950
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock warrants and options................ 1,447 219 --
Redemption of convertible debt................................................. (1,500) -- --
Redemption of convertible preferred stock...................................... (2,500) -- --
Repayment of note payable, capitalized leases and line of credit............... (3,732) (1,665) (2,305)
Repayments of loans and distributions to former stockholders................... -- (129) (1,707)
Proceeds from notes payable to officers........................................ -- -- 625
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities.................................. 26,560 12,615 2,821
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash.................................................. 2,209 845 (30)
Cash at beginning of period...................................................... 1,993 1,148 1,178
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of period............................................................ $ 4,202 $ 1,993 $ 1,148
========= ========= =========
Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid.................................................................. $ 6,812 $ 1,877 $ 1,966
Taxes paid..................................................................... $ 2 $ 57 $ 351
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
59
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 1. THE COMPANY
ORGANIZATION
FiNet.com ("FiNet" or "the Company") is a provider of mortgage services to
consumers and mortgage broker businesses, including online mortgage services.
The Company primarily markets its consumer mortgage services through marketing
agreements with general interest websites and co-branding arrangements with
financial services websites. FiNet operates its business-to-consumer and
business-to-business segments through Monument Mortgage, Inc. ("Monument"),
which is licensed to originate loans in 30 states and the District of Columbia,
and is licensed to fund and close mortgage loans in 32 states and the District
of Columbia. The majority of Monument's business activity is carried out in
California.
Effective June 1, 1999, the Company changed its name from Finet Holdings
Corporation to FiNet.com, Inc.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The Company has a limited operating history under its current business
model, and its prospects are subject to the risks, expenses and uncertainties
frequently encountered by companies in the new and rapidly evolving markets for
Internet products and services. These risks include the failure to develop and
extend the Company's online service brands, the rejection of the Company's
services by consumers, vendors and/or advertisers, and the inability of the
Company to maintain and increase the levels of traffic on its online services,
as well as other risks and uncertainties.
FiNet is substantially dependent on its mortgage finance partners, and the
termination of one or more of these relationships would adversely affect FiNet's
business. Through Monument Mortgage, Inc., the Company funds and closes mortgage
loans. As a non-depository mortgage banker, Monument Mortgage is dependent on
specialized mortgage credit facilities to finance its mortgage lending
activities. The Company defaulted on both its warehouse credit lines with
Residential Funding Corporation ("RFC") during fiscal 1999, and both warehouse
lines have expired. However, RFC continues to provide warehouse credit
facilities through a month-to-month extension of credit as a new agreement is
being negotiated and potential additional warehouse financing resources are
sought. Management expects that RFC will continue to extend the facility monthly
until the agreement is finalized; however, there can be no assurance that such
extensions will be granted.
The Company experienced losses for fiscal 1999, 1998, and 1997 and had an
accumulated deficit at April 30, 1999. Net losses are expected for the
foreseeable future. Equity capital has been raised in fiscal 1999, 1998 and
1997, and $43,020,000 was raised subsequent to fiscal 1999. In addition, the
Company's cash on hand at April 30, 1999 was $4,202,000. Future capital
requirements depend on many factors including the Company's ability to execute
its business plan. The Company may need to raise additional capital through the
issuance of debt or equity to execute its business plan. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional capital, or that
such capital will be available at all on satisfactory terms. Failure to raise
additional capital when needed could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.
60
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FiNet and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been
eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial
statements to conform to the fiscal 1999 presentation.
USE OF ESTIMATES IN PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash balances and instruments with
maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase.
MORTGAGE LOANS HELD FOR SALE
Mortgage loans held for sale, net of related discounts and premiums, are
carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Market valuation
adjustments of $3,851,000 and $396,000 at April 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively,
were required and recorded in a valuation allowance by charges to revenues.
Pursuant to the mortgage terms for the loans, the borrowers have pledged the
underlying real estate as collateral for the loans.
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
Originated loan servicing is recorded based on its relative fair value when
separated from the underlying loan and retained by the Company. Purchased loan
servicing is recorded at cost, which is not in excess of the future net cash
flows related to the servicing profile. Impairment of mortgage servicing rights
is determined using the estimated fair value of the servicing rights based on
third party appraisals or written bids. The appraisals use a discounted cash
flow analysis on a disaggregated portfolio basis stratified by loan type,
investor type, and interest rate to determine fair value. Any indicated
impairment is recorded using a valuation allowance.
FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, including furniture and equipment under
capital leases, are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization, which
includes the amortization of assets recorded under capital leases, is computed
straight-line over their estimated useful lives of three to seven years. The
cost of repairs and maintenance of furniture, fixtures and equipment is charged
to operating expense.
61
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Lending transaction fees are deferred until the related loan is sold. Upon
sale of the loan, deferred transaction fee income is recognized and included in
gain on sale of mortgage loans. Discounts and premiums from the origination of
mortgage loans held for sale are deferred and recognized as adjustments to gain
or loss upon sale.
Loan servicing fees represent fees earned for servicing loans for various
investors. The fees are either based on a contractual percentage of the
outstanding principal balance or a fixed dollar amount per loan. Fees are
credited to income when the related payments are received.
Loan brokerage fees represent fees earned by the Company's
business-to-consumer segment for processing of mortgage loan applications for
third party lenders. The fees for providing these services are recognized at
such time as the loans are funded by the lender.
Direct loan origination costs and other production costs attributable to
inventory as well as other costs associated with revenues earned during the
period are included in "Cost of revenues" in the Company's Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
The Company's revenue components are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CURRENT PRESENTATION
-------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1999 1998 1997
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Warehouse interest income.................................. $ 6,009 $ 3,247 $ 2,433
Gain on sale of servicing rights and mortgage loans........ 11,847 10,187 9,022
Loan servicing fees........................................ 1,319 823 589
Loan brokerage fees........................................ 2,895 418 94
Marketing services......................................... 106 367 60
Other...................................................... 237 118 146
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenues........................................... $ 22,413 $ 15,160 $ 12,344
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
In fiscal 1998 and fiscal 1997, direct loan origination costs were included
in the computation of the gain or loss on sale of the related loans. The
components of fiscal 1998 and fiscal 1997 statements of operations have been
reclassified and condensed in the fiscal 1999 statement of operations to conform
62
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
to the fiscal 1999 presentation. Following are the Company's revenues consistent
with the fiscal 1998 and fiscal 1997 classifications:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIOR PRESENTATION
-------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1999 1998 1997
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Warehouse interest income.................................. $ 6,009 $ 3,247 $ 2,433
Gain on sale of servicing rights and mortgage loans........ 8,591 7,543 6,827
Loan servicing fees........................................ 1,319 868 589
Loan brokerage fees........................................ 2,895 418 94
Marketing services......................................... 106 367 60
Other...................................................... 237 118 146
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenues........................................... $ 19,157 $ 12,561 $ 10,149
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
MARKETING AND ADVERTISING COSTS
All marketing and advertising costs are charged to operating expenses as
incurred.
INCOME TAXES
The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated federal and separate or
combined tax returns for certain states. State and local income taxes are filed
according to the taxable activities of the Company.
In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," the Company uses the
liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of existing differences between financial reporting and tax
reporting bases of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating losses and
tax credit carry-forwards, using enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets
are recognized to the extent that management believes, based on available
evidence, that it is more likely than not that they will be realized. Deferred
tax expense represents the net change in the deferred tax asset or liability
balance during the year. This amount, together with income taxes currently
payable or refundable for the current year, represents the total income tax
expense for the year.
LOSS PER SHARE
The Company computes basic net loss and diluted net loss per share in
accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." Under the provisions of SFAS
No. 128 basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available
to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by
dividing the net loss available to common stockholders for the period by the
weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
during the period, to the extent such common equivalent shares are dilutive.
Since the common equivalent shares for all years were antidilutive (i.e. reduce
net loss per share), basic and diluted loss per share are the same.
63
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
The Company has excluded all outstanding warrants and options to purchase
common stock and shares potentially issuable upon conversion of convertible
subordinated debentures existing at April 30, 1998 from the calculation of loss
per share, because their inclusion would be antidilutive (i.e. reduce the net
loss per share) for all periods presented. The number of options to purchase
common stock that were excluded are 7,512,494, 737,875, and 558,875 for 1999,
1998 and 1997, respectively. Warrants to purchase common stock of 16,421,000,
10,596,000 and 6,907,000 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and 2,659,000
shares potentially issuable upon conversion of subordinated debentures at
April 30, 1998 were also excluded.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The Company adopted SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" at
April 30, 1999. The Company is required to display comprehensive income (loss)
and its components as part of the financial statements. Other comprehensive
income (loss) includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from net
income (loss). The Company has no material components of other comprehensive
loss, and, accordingly, the comprehensive loss is the same as the net loss for
all periods presented.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in
accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principals Board ("APB") Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and complies with the
disclosure provision of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation."
Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is based on the excess of the estimated
fair value of the Company's stock over the exercise price, if any, on the grant
date.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 1998 the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS
No. 133"). However, the effective date for this pronouncement was delayed for
one year from the original required date of fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 1999. SFAS No. 133 will require the Company to record all derivatives
on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in derivative fair values will
either be recognized in earnings as offsets to the changes in fair value of
related hedged assets, liabilities and firm commitments or, for forecasted
transactions, deferred and recorded as a component of comprehensive income in
stockholders' equity until the hedged transactions occur and are recognized in
earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedging derivative's change in fair value
will be immediately recognized in earnings. The Company anticipates engaging in
hedging activity in the future, and therefore expects to be impacted by the
pronouncement. The impact of FAS No. 133 on the Company's consolidated financial
statements, however, will depend on a variety of factors, including the level of
future hedging activity, the types of hedging instruments used and the
effectiveness of such instruments.
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
On May 19, 1998 the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding
shares of Mical Mortgage, Inc. ("Mical"), a non-public mortgage banker with
offices in San Diego, California and Las Vegas, Nevada, in exchange for 552,000
shares of FiNet's common stock. At the purchase date, 431,930
64
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS (CONTINUED)
of these shares were issued and were valued at $1,674,000. The remaining shares
are issuable upon the resolution of specified contingencies related to the
acquisition and will be recognized as additional purchase price if and when the
contingencies are resolved. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase.
Accordingly, the results of Mical's operations have been included in the
Company's consolidated financial statements subsequent to the acquisition date.
The $3,332,000 excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the acquired
net assets, net of purchase accounting adjustments, was recorded as goodwill.
The Company discontinued the operations of Mical during fiscal 1999. (See
Note 13.)
On April 30, 1998 FiNet acquired all the issued and outstanding common
shares of Coastal Federal Mortgage Company ("Coastal"), a non-public, sub prime
mortgage banker with offices in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Florida, in
exchange for 1,250,000 shares of its common stock. This transaction was
accounted for as a pooling of interests and, consequently, the consolidated
financial statements of FiNet have been restated to include the balance sheet
and statements of operations of Coastal for all periods reported. The Company
discontinued the operations of Coastal during fiscal 1999 and recorded $405,000
in "Special charges" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations related to
liquidating the assets and satisfying the liabilities of Coastal.
On February 9, 1998 the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding
stock of iQualify, Inc., a software developer whose principal asset is the
iQualify software currently used by FiNet, for a consideration of 50,000 shares
of FiNet common stock valued at $180,000, plus certain future usage-based
payments. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase.
In December 1997, the Company completed the purchase of substantially all of
the assets of Real Estate Office Software, Inc. ("REOS"), a Nevada corporation.
REOS is a software development and marketing company whose primary product is a
proprietary realtor productivity tool called the Real Estate Office. The total
price paid was $1,261,000. Cash of $641,000 was paid and the remaining $620,000
was settled with 200,000 shares of FiNet's common stock. The acquisition cost
was recorded as purchased technology. In fiscal 1999, management determined that
REOS no longer fit the strategic direction of the Company and that the purchased
technology was permanently impaired based on projected future cash flows.
Accordingly, the Company expensed the remaining recorded value of REOS of
$690,000 in "Special charges" in the Company's Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
On December 31, 1996, FiNet acquired all of the outstanding common stock of
Monument Mortgage, Inc. ("Monument") in exchange for 8.4 million common shares
of the Company and a cash payment of $1,000,000. For accounting purposes, the
cash payment was deemed a dividend payment to Monument stockholders and the
common shares issued in the acquisition have been treated as a recapitalization
of Monument, with Monument as the reverse acquisition acquirer. The historical
financial statements prior to December 31, 1996 are those of Monument and are
deemed to be those of the reporting entity. Since the Company's operations were
minimal or dormant during the year ended December 31, 1996, the reverse
acquisition was considered a capital transaction rather than a business
combination. Following the reverse acquisition, the Company changed its fiscal
year end from December 31 to April 30 to conform to the fiscal year end of
Monument.
65
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 4. MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
Mortgage servicing rights and the related valuation allowance activity for
fiscal 1999, 1998, and 1997 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
--------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year....................................... $ 5,478 $ 579 $ 156
Additions.......................................................... 1,192 5,763 463
Sales.............................................................. (1,825) (268) --
Scheduled amortization............................................. (1,199) (596) (40)
Impairment additions charged to operations......................... (1,703) -- --
Impairment reductions credited to operations....................... 750 -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Ending balance..................................................... $ 2,693 $ 5,478 $ 579
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
In connection with mortgage servicing activities, the Company segregates
escrow and custodial funds in a separate trust account and excludes this balance
of $3.7 million and $16.0 million at April 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively, from
its balance sheet.
NOTE 5. FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT
Furniture, fixtures and equipment consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
APRIL 30
--------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1999 1998
--------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Furniture and fixtures.................................................... $ 315 $ 1,010
Computer equipment........................................................ 2,650 1,855
Office equipment.......................................................... 1,622 225
Leasehold improvements.................................................... 243 205
--------- ---------
Total cost................................................................ 4,830 3,295
Less: accumulated depreciation............................................ (3,255) (1,854)
--------- ---------
Net furniture, fixtures and equipment..................................... $ 1,575 $ 1,441
========= =========
</TABLE>
66
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 6. BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS
Borrowing arrangements consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
APRIL 30
--------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1999 1998
--------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
WAREHOUSE AND OTHER LINES OF CREDIT
Warehouse lines of credit:
$35 and $55 million committed at April 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively, bearing interest
at LIBOR + variable spread, expired December 31, 1998 with monthly extensions......... $ 30,906 $ 55,000
$25 million uncommitted gestation, bearing interest at LIBOR + 2.5%, expired December
31, 1998.............................................................................. -- 22,552
$10 and $24 million committed at April 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively, bearing interest
at LIBOR + 2.5%, expired December 31, 1998............................................ 1,001 7,707
Purchase/Repurchase agreements:
$10 million, bearing interest at prime.................................................. 138 --
$10 million, bearing interest at prime.................................................. 993 --
--------- ---------
33,038 85,259
Servicing acquisition financing............................................................. -- 400
Revolving line of credit.................................................................... -- 1,000
--------- ---------
$ 33,038 $ 86,659
========= =========
NOTES PAYABLE AND CAPITALIZED LEASES:
$1.0 million original note................................................................ $ -- $ 500
Notes and capital leases (various rates).................................................. 481 360
--------- ---------
481 860
========= =========
3% CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES...................................................... $ -- $ 5,500
========= =========
</TABLE>
67
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 6. BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED)
WAREHOUSE LINES OF CREDIT
The Company's continuing operations employ an uncommitted $35 million
revolving warehouse facility. The remaining facilities were used by the
Company's discontinued operations, and, after the balances are liquidated, will
not be renegotiated. The $35 million warehouse facility has expired. However,
the warehouse lender has provided month-to- month extensions as a new agreement
is being negotiated and potential additional warehouse financing resources are
sought. Management expects that the lender will continue to extend the facility
monthly until the agreement is finalized; however, there can be no assurance
that such extensions will be granted. At April 30, 1999, and 1998, LIBOR was
4.90%, and 5.69%, respectively, and the prime rate was 7.75% and 8.5%,
respectively. For fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company recorded warehouse
interest expense of $6,587,000, $2,710,000, and $1,874,000, respectively.
WAREHOUSE FACILITY COVENANTS
The agreement for the warehouse line of credit (the "Agreement") contains
various financial covenants including minimum net worth, current ratio, tangible
net worth, and leverage ratio requirements. Should an event of default occur, as
defined in the Agreement, outstanding principal and interest are due on demand.
At April 30, 1998, the Company was in violation of a tangible net worth debt
covenant for which the lender subsequently issued a formal waiver letter.
In the second quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company's primary warehouse
lender, General Motors Acceptance Corporation/Residential Funding Corporation
("GMAC/RFC" or "RFC"), notified the Company that it was in default of its
lending agreements, as the required interest and debt service obligations were
not met as they became due. The Company was also in violation of certain
financial covenants. As of April 30, 1999, the Company had cured all defaults
with RFC and was current on the required interest and debt service payments. The
warehouse lines of credit with RFC expired on December 31, 1998. RFC and the
Company have executed monthly extension agreements to these warehouse lines,
with the most recent extension expiring on June 30, 1999.
At April 30, 1999, the Company was in violation of various financial
covenants related to its non-primary warehouse lenders. The Company is
negotiating the closure of these warehouse lines.
NOTES AND CAPITAL LEASES
At April 30, 1999 and 1998, the Company had notes payable of $300,000 and
$500,000, respectively. The note representing the fiscal 1998 balance had an
interest rate of prime + .625%. The note representing the fiscal 1998 balance
has been paid. In fiscal 1999 the notes bore interest rates of 10% and 15%. The
Company incurred interest expense relating to these notes of $147,000, $82,000
and $121,000 for 1999, 1998, and 1997, respectively.
At April 30, 1999 and 1998, the Company had capitalized lease obligations of
$181,000 and $360,000, respectively. These lease obligations are payable in
monthly installments through 2002. The Company incurred interest expense of
$19,000, $36,000 and $26,000 for fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997,
68
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 6. BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED)
respectively, on these lease obligations. The equipment financed serves as
collateral for the capitalized leases.
3% SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
The Company issued $7,000,000 3% Subordinated Convertible Debentures in a
private placement with interest payable in common stock of FiNet when converted,
or in cash at maturity, redemption or retirement. The Company also issued
175,000 detachable warrants for purchase of the Company's common stock in
connection with the debenture issuance. These debentures were issued in three
separate tranches with the first two tranches issued in fiscal 1998 totaling
$5,500,000 and the third tranch issued in fiscal 1999 totaling $1,500,000. The
debentures were convertible into the Company's common stock at the lesser of
$5.00 per common share or 78% of the determined market price prior to
conversion.
The Company recorded $1,974,000 as additional paid in capital for the
discount deemed related to imputed interest for the preferential conversion
feature on the debentures. This discount was amortized to interest expense over
the period from the date of issue to the date debentures first became
convertible. Interest expense of $1,687,000 and $287,000 in fiscal 1999 and
1998, respectively, was recognized in connection with the discount amortization
and is included in other interest expense. Additionally, the Company recorded
$269,000 in fiscal 1999 as a discount and additional paid in capital for the
deemed fair value of 175,000 detachable warrants. This discount was fully
amortized to interest expense during fiscal 1999.
In January 1999, $1,100,000 of the total $7,000,000 debentures were
converted into 2,200,000 common shares at a conversion price of fifty cents per
share, and an additional $4,400,000 of debentures were converted into 7,333,333
common shares at a conversion price of sixty cents per share. The remaining
$1,500,000 of debentures were redeemed for cash at 100 percent of face value. In
connection with the redemption, the Company also issued 840,000 5-year warrants
exercisable at $1.50 per share, to the debenture holders. Expense of $739,000
was recorded for the deemed fair value of these warrants and is included in
"Other expense" in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Additionally, capitalized debt issuance costs of $546,000 were expensed in
fiscal 1999 and are included in "Other interest expense" on the Company's
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
NOTE 7. LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE
Prior to the December 31, 1996 reverse acquisition, FiNet had incurred
$969,000 of unsecured trade creditor accounts payable. The Company had settled a
majority of these claims by April 30, 1997. The creditors agreed to accept, on
average, 33.8% of what they were owed. The payments were made in the form of
cash and shares of the Company's common stock. The reduction of this liability
gave rise to extraordinary gain of $312,000 for the year ended April 30, 1997.
The balance of liabilities subject to compromise was $438,000 at April 30, 1999
and April 30, 1998.
69
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment under non-cancelable
operating and capital leases. Future minimum payments consist of the following
at April 30, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR OPERATING CAPITAL
- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
2000................................................................ $ 600 $ 138
2001................................................................ 494 54
2002................................................................ 152 8
2003................................................................ 92 --
2004................................................................ 3 --
--------- ---------
Total minimum lease payments........................................ $ 1,341 200
=========
Less amount representing interest................................... (19)
---------
Present value of minimum lease payments............................. $ 181
=========
</TABLE>
Rental expense for fiscal 1999, 1998, and 1997, was $867,000, $601,000 and
$514,000, respectively.
LITIGATION
Prior to the Mical acquisition a lawsuit was filed which alleges, among
other things, that Mical made certain payments in violation of the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act and induced mortgage brokers to breach their alleged
fiduciary duties. The plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory and punitive
damages. Management believes that its compensation programs comply with
applicable laws and with long standing industry practices and that it has
meritorious defenses to the action. The Company intends to defend vigorously
against the action and believes that the ultimate resolution will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
The Company and certain subsidiaries are defendants in various legal
proceedings. Although it is difficult to predict the outcome of such cases,
after reviewing with counsel all such proceedings, management does not expect
the aggregate liability, if any, resulting therefrom, will have a material
adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations
of the Company and its subsidiaries.
NOTE 9. MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES AND RELATED RISKS
In the normal course of business, companies in the mortgage banking industry
encounter certain economic and regulatory risks including: interest rate risk,
market risk, credit risk and repurchase risk.
The Company's commitments to extend credit (pipeline loans) for which
interest rates were committed to borrowers, subject to loan approval, totaled
approximately $25,604,000 and $87,300,000 as of April 30, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. Until a rate commitment is extended by the Company to a borrower,
there is no market risk to the Company. If market interest rates rise between
the time the Company commits to originate a loan at a specific rate and the time
such loans are priced for sale, the market price of the loan declines, resulting
in a loss on the sale of the loan.
70
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 9. MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES AND RELATED RISKS (CONTINUED)
To protect against such losses, the Company attempts to manage its interest
rate risk exposure through hedging transactions using a combination of forward
sales of mortgage-backed securities and forward whole-loan sales to fix the
sales price of loans the Company expects to fund. Forward sales are sales of
loans with settlement dates more than five days in the future. Before entering
into hedging transactions, the Company performs an analysis of the loans with
committed interest rates. This analysis includes taking into account such
factors as the estimated portion of such loans that will ultimately be funded,
note rate, interest rates, inventory of loans and applications and other factors
to determine the type and amount of forward commitment and hedging transactions.
The Company attempts to make forward commitments for, or hedge substantially,
all of its estimated interest rate risk on the loans. The Company does not
believe that hedging its interest rate risk with respect to the non-prime loans
is cost effective because these loans generally have higher interest rate
spreads and generally lack sensitivity to interest rate changes due to their
credit characteristics and the short period of time held by the Company. The
Company had mandatory and optional forward commitments at April 30, 1999 and
1998 aggregating $43,829,000 and $46,400,000, respectively. These commitments
covered the market risk associated with the mortgage loans held for sale to
investors of $33,438,000 and $63,034,000 respectively, and the pipeline loans
for which interest rates were committed of $25,604,000 and $87,300,000,
respectively.
As is customary in the marketplace, none of the forward payment obligations
of any of the Company's counterparties are currently secured or subject to
margin requirements. The Company attempts to limit its credit exposure on
forward sales arrangements by entering into forward sales contracts exclusively
with institutions that the Company believes are sound credit risks, and by
limiting its exposure to any single counterparty.
Fees paid to investors are deferred and subsequently expensed as the loans
are delivered to the investor in proportion to the percentage relationship of
loans delivered to the total commitment amount. Any remaining fee is recognized
as a period expense at the expiration of its commitment period or earlier if
exercise of the commitment is deemed remote.
The Company reduces its exposure to default risk (other than first-payment
defaults by customers) and most of the prepayment risk normally inherent in the
mortgage lending business by selling all funded loans. However, in connection
with loan sales and bulk servicing sales, the Company makes representations and
warranties relating to credit information, loan documentation and collateral. To
the extent that the Company does not comply with such representations and
warranties, or there are early payment defaults, the Company may be required to
repurchase the loans or indemnify the purchasers for any losses. For fiscal
1999, 1998, and 1997, the Company repurchased loans totaling $10,034,000,
$347,000, and zero, respectively, which resulted in losses of $759,000, $347,000
and zero, respectively.
NOTE 10. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following disclosures of the estimated fair values of financial
instruments are made in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107,
"Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments." The estimated fair
value amounts have been determined by using available market information and
appropriate methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily
required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value.
Accordingly, the estimates presented herein may not be indicative of the amounts
that could be realized in a current market exchange. The
71
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 10. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a
material effect on the estimated fair value amounts disclosed in the following
paragraph.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value
of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate
such value:
- Cash, accounts receivable, and warehouse and other lines of credit. The
carrying amounts of these assets and liabilities approximate fair value
because of the short maturity of those instruments.
- Mortgages held for sale. Fair values for mortgages held for sale are based
on management's estimate of the ultimate realizable value.
- Mortgage servicing rights. Fair values for mortgage servicing rights are
based on third party appraisals and written bids to purchase the servicing
portfolios.
- Notes payable. The carrying value is considered to be a reasonable
estimate of fair value based on interest rates of similar financial
instruments in the marketplace.
- Loan commitments to fund (locked pipeline) and loan commitments to sell.
The fair value for the locked pipeline, allowing for estimated fallout
based on historical experience, and loan commitments to sell, are based on
quoted market prices.
The carrying values and the estimated fair values of our financial
instruments at April 30, 1999 and 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---------------------- ----------------------
CARRYING ESTIMATED CARRYING ESTIMATED
VALUE FAIR VALUE VALUE FAIR VALUE
--------- ----------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
Assets:
Mortgages held for sale....................... $ 33,438 $ 33,438 $ 63,034 $ 63,363
Mortgage servicing rights..................... 2,693 2,693 5,478 5,478
Liabilities:
Notes payable................................. 300 300 860 860
Off Balance Sheet:
Loan commitments to fund...................... -- 395 -- (34)
Loan commitments to sell...................... -- 98 -- 43
</TABLE>
NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
In September 1998, the Company issued 250 shares of its $2,500,000 Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock ("Preferred") in a private placement generating
$2,286,250 of proceeds, net of expenses. In addition, the Company issued
Warrants to the Preferred investors to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's
common stock at $1.00 per share. The Company recorded a preferred stock discount
of $705,000 upon issuance of the preferred stock. This discount was amortized to
the date the preferred stock first became convertible. The entire discount has
been amortized and is reported as "In-substance preferred dividend" on the
Company's 1999 Consolidated Statement of Operations. In
72
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 1999, the $2,500,000 Series A
Convertible Preferred stock was redeemed at face value.
In November 1998, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock at
eighty cents per share, for proceeds of $2,000,000 in a private placement. Per
the agreement, an additional 1,000,000 shares were issued, bringing the total
issuance to 3,500,000 shares and the price per share to fifty-seven cents per
share, as adjusted. In connection with the issuance, the Company agreed to
reduce the exercise price of 1,000,000 common stock purchase warrants owned by
the investor from $5.00 to the then fair market value of $1.00 per share.
WARRANTS
As of April 30, 1999, the Company had outstanding warrants as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXERCISE
NUMBER OF PRICE YEAR OF
WARRANTS ISSUED PER SHARE EXPIRATION
- --------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
(THOUSANDS)
13,293 $ 0.50--1.50 2001--2008
2,747 1.50--3.00 2000--2004
25 3.00--4.50 2003
356 4.50--5.00 2001--2003
---------
16,421
=========
</TABLE>
NOTE 12. STOCK OPTIONS
1989 STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Company's 1989 Stock Option Plan (the "1989 Plan") provides for the
grant of options to officers, directors, other key employees and consultants of
the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,750,000 shares of common stock.
The 1989 Plan is administered by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors
is authorized to determine the terms of options granted under the 1989 Plan,
including the number of shares subject to the option, exercise price, term and
exercisability. Options granted under the 1989 Plan may be incentive stock
options or nonqualified stock options.
The exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than 100% of
the fair market value of the common stock as of the date of grant (110% of the
fair market value in the case of an optionee who owns more than 10% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of the Company's capital stock). Options
may not be exercised more than ten years after the date of grant (five years in
the case of 10% stockholders).
Upon termination of employment, the optionee generally has the right to
exercise, for 90 days following the termination date, any outstanding option to
the extent it is exercisable on the date of termination, after which all
unexercised options lapse. In the event of an optionee's death or disability,
the optionee may exercise any outstanding option, to the extent it is
exercisable, for one year following the termination date.
73
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 12. STOCK OPTIONS (CONTINUED)
As of April 30, 1999 and 1998, there were 8,051 and 999,958 shares,
respectively, available for grant under the 1989 Plan. The 1989 Plan expires in
June of 1999.
1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Company's 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "1998 Plan") provides for the
grant of options to officers, directors, other employees and consultants of
FiNet.com to purchase up to an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of common stock.
The 1998 Plan is administered by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors
determines the terms of options granted under the 1998 Plan, including the
number of shares subject to the option, exercise price, term and exercisability.
Options granted under the 1998 Plan may be incentive stock options or
nonqualified options. In general, the 1998 Plan has the same terms and
conditions as the 1989 Plan. As of April 30, 1999 and 1998, 419,544 and
4,000,000 options, were available for grant under the 1998 plan, respectively.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Company's 1998 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan (the
"Directors' Plan") provides for an automatic grant of an option to purchase
40,000 shares of common stock to non-employee directors upon their election or
appointment to the Board of Directors and for subsequent annual grants. The
aggregate number of shares that can be purchased under this plan is 500,000. The
exercise price of the options is 85% of the fair market value of the common
stock on the date of grant. The Directors' Plan is administered by the Board of
Directors. Options granted under the Directors' Plan become exercisable in four
equal annual installments, commencing on the first anniversary of the date of
grant. To the extent that an option is not exercisable on the date that a
director ceases to be a director of the Company, the unexercisable portion
lapses. As of April 30, 1999 and 1998, 300,000 and 500,000 options,
respectively, were available for grant under this plan.
STOCK BONUS INCENTIVE PLAN
The Company's Stock Bonus Incentive Plan (the "Stock Bonus Plan") provides
for the grant of bonus shares to any of the Company's employees, directors,
officers and to consultants or advisers to the Company. The Board of Directors
has authorized up to an aggregate of 875,000 shares of common stock for issuance
as bonus awards under the Stock Bonus Plan. The Stock Bonus Plan is currently
administered by the Board of Directors. Each grant of bonus shares becomes
exercisable according to a schedule to be established by the Board of Directors
at the time of grant.
OTHER AGREEMENT
The Company has an employment agreement with an executive officer which
provides a 4% anti-dilution provision through the term of his employment
contract (October 2002). This Agreement provides that upon the issuance of new
shares of FiNet common stock, options are granted to the executive officer with
an exercise price equal to the fair market value at the date of the grant.
During fiscal 1999, the Company granted an option to purchase 2,376,291 shares
of common stock at $1.03 per share pursuant to this Agreement.
74
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 12. STOCK OPTIONS (CONTINUED)
OTHER
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related
interpretations in accounting for its stock options. Accordingly, compensation
expense is only recognized if the option price is below the fair market value at
the date of grant. Had compensation expense been determined for stock options
granted in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997 based on the fair value at grant dates
consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company's condensed Pro Forma Statement of
Operations for fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997 would have been as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FISCAL 1999 FISCAL 1998 FISCAL 1997
- -------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE
DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Estimated stock-based compensation................ $ 1,715 $ 200 $ 125
Net (loss) as reported............................ (36,538) (9,379) (2,778)
Pro forma net (loss).............................. (38,253) (9,579) (2,903)
(Loss) per share as reported...................... (0.79) (0.31) (0.19)
Pro forma (loss) per share........................ (0.83) (0.32) (0.20)
</TABLE>
The pro forma amounts were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following assumptions for fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997,
respectively: risk-free interest rates of 4.78% to 5.53%; 5.5%; and 6.6% to
6.7%; volatility factor of the expected market price of FiNet's common stock of
141%, 50% and 50%; no dividend growth rate since FiNet does not intend to pay
dividends on its common stock; and expected lives equal to one year over the
vesting period for fiscal 1999, and equal to the remaining option terms for
fiscal 1998 and 1997.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value and exercise price of options
granted during fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997 are summarized below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED-
OF AVERAGE AVERAGE
FISCAL YEAR OPTIONS FAIR VALUE EXERCISE PRICE
- ------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ----------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1999
Stock Price = Exercise Price.......................... 7,533,020 $ .88 $ .99
Stock Price > Exercise Price.......................... 80,000 1.08 1.35
Stock Price < Exercise Price.......................... 7,500 .85 1.13
1998
Stock Price = Exercise Price.......................... 148,000 2.85 4.44
Stock Price > Exercise Price.......................... 40,000 2.83 .50
1997
Stock Price > Exercise Price.......................... 120,000 .80 .50
</TABLE>
75
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 12. STOCK OPTIONS (CONTINUED)
OTHER (Continued)
The following table summarizes stock option plan activity for fiscal 1999,
1998 and 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
EXERCISE AVERAGE
EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION SUMMARY OPTIONS PRICE EXERCISE PRICE
- --------------------------------------------------- ---------- ------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at May 1, 1996 (Plan inception)........ 468,042 $ 0.06--0.50 $ 0.06
Granted............................................ 120,000 0.50--0.50 0.50
Exercised.......................................... (3,167) 0.06--0.06 0.06
Expired / Canceled................................. (26,000) 0.06--0.06 0.06
----------
Outstanding at May 1, 1997......................... 558,875 0.06--0.50 0.15
Granted............................................ 188,000 0.50--5.50 4.18
Exercised.......................................... -- -- --
Expired / Canceled................................. (9,000) 3.00 2.81
----------
Outstanding at May 1, 1998......................... 737,875 0.06--5.50 1.15
Granted............................................ 7,620,520 0.50--3.25 .99
Exercised.......................................... (383,035) 0.06--0.75 .07
Expired / Canceled................................. (462,866) 0.50--3.25 1.19
----------
Outstanding at April 30, 1999...................... 7,512,494 $ 0.06--5.50 $ 1.03
==========
</TABLE>
76
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 12. STOCK OPTIONS (CONTINUED)
OTHER (Continued)
Exercise prices for stock options outstanding as of April 30, 1999, 1998,
and 1997, the number of options exercisable, and the weighted average remaining
contractual lives are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
SHARES NUMBER AVERAGE REMAINING
EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE CONTRACTUAL LIFE
- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ---------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(YEARS)
April 30, 1997
$0.06............................................................. 438,875 438,480 8.39
0.50............................................................. 120,000 120,000 5.75
--------- ----------
558,875 558,480
========= ==========
April 30, 1998
$ .06............................................................. 438,875 438,638 7.50
.50............................................................. 120,000 120,000 3.50
3.00............................................................. 24,000 16,000 4.33
3.25............................................................. 40,000 40,000 4.20
4.50............................................................. 75,000 18,750 4.75
5.50............................................................. 40,000 40,000 4.47
--------- ----------
737,875 673,388
========= ==========
April 30, 1999
$ .06............................................................. 65,634 65,555 6.50
.50............................................................. 160,000 160,000 2.84
.56............................................................. 1,300,000 325,000 9.45
.64............................................................. 40,000 40,000 9.57
.66............................................................. 475,000 109,375 9.46
.72............................................................. 80,000 5,000 9.53
.75............................................................. 1,389,488 303,949 9.46
.88............................................................. 25,000 8,334 9.51
.94............................................................. 10,812 4,000 9.75
1.00............................................................. 2,813 351 9.50
1.03............................................................. 2,781,247 400,258 9.76
1.06............................................................. 120,000 -- 9.67
1.06............................................................. 50,000 12,500 9.71
1.13............................................................. 7,500 -- 9.61
1.97............................................................. 500,000 100,000 9.86
2.07............................................................. 40,000 40,000 9.80
2.25............................................................. 350,000 -- 9.84
4.50............................................................. 75,000 75,000 3.75
5.50............................................................. 40,000 40,000 3.47
--------- ----------
7,512,494 1,689,322
========= ==========
</TABLE>
77
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 12. STOCK OPTIONS (CONTINUED)
OTHER (Continued)
FiNet has elected to follow APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations
in accounting for its employee and director stock-based awards. Under APB
Opinion No. 25, the Company does not recognize compensation expense with respect
to such awards if the exercise price equals or exceeds the fair value of the
underlying security on the date of grant and other terms are fixed.
NOTE 13. SPECIAL CHARGES
The Company recorded nonrecurring charges associated with discontinued
business units during fiscal 1999. During the third quarter of fiscal 1999, the
Company's Board of Directors approved a plan to cease Mical's operations and
close its facilities. The Company assessed the remaining goodwill balance and
determined that the amount had no future economic value. Goodwill of $3,189,000,
net of purchase accounting adjustments and recorded amortization, was expensed
as part of these special charges. Approximately 130 employees were terminated
during fiscal 1999 as a result of the Mical closure. The Company also recorded a
special charge expense of $642,000 during the third quarter to recognize exit
costs primarily for severance and occupancy lease costs net of recovery from
subleases.
Except for the items detailed above totaling $642,000, all other financial
statement effects of winding down Mical are included in results from operations
as incurred. At April 30, 1999, the balance of the special charge accrual was
$202,000, which represents lease costs of vacated space that the Company expects
to incur subsequent to April 30, 1999.
The Company also recorded nonrecurring expenses of $405,000 to liquidate
certain assets and settle certain liabilities in connection with closing its
Coastal Federal Mortgage subsidiary, and $690,000 to expense the unamortized
balance of its Real Estate Office Software (REOS) technology. Management closed
Coastal Federal Mortgage and expensed the remaining balance of REOS upon
determining that the Company would no longer employ these assets in its future
strategic direction.
In fiscal 1998, the Company wrote off $1,010,000 of intangible assets.
Management determined that these assets were permanently impaired, as they did
not fit the Company's strategic plans and would no longer be employed in future
operations.
NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES
The provisions for income taxes for fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, consist of
the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
--------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current Federal...................................................... $ -- $ 236 $ 219
Current State........................................................ 5 80 71
--------- --------- ---------
5 316 290
Deferred Federal..................................................... -- (70) (50)
Deferred State....................................................... -- (20) (15)
--------- --------- ---------
-- (90) (65)
--------- --------- ---------
Total................................................................ $ 5 $ 226 $ 225
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
78
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The Company's effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal rate for
fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997 primarily due to increases in the valuation allowance
and non-deductible goodwill.
The significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and
assets as of April 30, 1999 and 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
--------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax liabilities
Originated mortgage servicing rights................................... $ 47 $ 460
Depreciation........................................................... 126 113
--------- ---------
Total deferred tax liabilities......................................... 173 573
--------- ---------
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards....................................... 18,736 12,366
Loan loss and other reserves........................................... 2,597 --
Goodwill and other intangibles......................................... 310 1,116
Deferred revenue....................................................... 202 --
Other.................................................................. 90 432
--------- ---------
Total deferred tax assets................................................ 21,935 13,914
Valuation allowance...................................................... (21,762) (13,341)
Net deferred tax asset................................................... 173 573
--------- ---------
Total net deferred tax liabilities and assets............................ $ -- $ --
========= =========
</TABLE>
Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that management believes,
based on available evidence, that it is more likely than not that they will be
realized. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the Company's ability to realize
the benefits associated with its net operating losses, a valuation allowance was
established against its net deferred tax asset. During fiscal 1999, the
valuation allowance was increased by $8,421,000. A portion of the valuation
allowance relates to deductions from the exercise of stock options. If realized,
the benefit from the reduction of that portion of the valuation allowance will
be credited to equity.
At April 30, 1999, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards
(NOLS) of approximately $49 million. The NOLs expire in the years 2004 through
2018. The Company has smaller state carryforwards. Due to ownership changes,
these carryforwards are subject to substantial annual limitations as provided by
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The
annual limitation could result in the expiration of a significant portion of the
NOLS before full utilization.
79
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 15. NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The following table presents non-cash investing and financing information
for fiscal 1999 and 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
--------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Common stock and warrants issued for expenses............................ $ 1,804 $ 392
Common stock issued for purchased
technology and intangibles............................................... 320 1,364
Warrants issued upon conversion of convertible debt...................... 739 --
Common stock issued upon debenture conversion............................ 5,500 --
In-substance dividend on preferred stock discount........................ 705 --
3% convertible debenture discount........................................ 423 --
Acquired in acquisition:
Furniture, fixtures & equipment.......................................... 505 --
Mortgages held for sale.................................................. 84,598
Other assets............................................................. 3,995 --
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses.............................. 9,829 --
Debt..................................................................... 82,634 --
</TABLE>
NOTE 16. SEGMENT DATA
The Company has adopted SFAS No. 131 "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information" which requires certain disclosures about
operating segments in a manner that is consistent with how management evaluates
the performance of the segment. The Company has
80
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 16. SEGMENT DATA (CONTINUED)
identified two reportable business segments: business-to-business and
business-to-consumer. Information related to the Company's reportable operating
segments is shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue
Business-to-business......................................................... $ 19,411 $ 14,394 $ 12,189
Business-to-consumer......................................................... 3,002 766 155
---------- ---------- ---------
Segment Revenue................................................................ $ 22,413 $ 15,160 $ 12,344
========== ========== =========
Operating income
Business-to-business......................................................... $ (17,455) $ (508) $ (1,061)
Business-to-consumer......................................................... (4,642) (4,485) (683)
---------- ---------- ---------
Segment operating income....................................................... (22,097) (4,993) (1,744)
Corporate.................................................................... (11,460) (3,740) (1,003)
---------- ---------- ---------
$ (33,557) $ (8,733) $ (2,747)
========== ========== =========
Capital expenditures
Business-to-business......................................................... $ 116 $ 1,486 $ 128
Business-to-consumer......................................................... 75 55 83
---------- ---------- ---------
Segment Capital expenditures................................................... 191 1,541 211
Corporate.................................................................... 703 113 121
---------- ---------- ---------
$ 894 $ 1,654 $ 332
========== ========== =========
Identifiable assets
Business-to-business......................................................... $ 22,147 $ 91,174 $ 5,505
Business-to-consumer......................................................... (3,782) 3,362 3,544
---------- ---------- ---------
Segment Identifiable assets.................................................... 18,365 94,536 9,049
Corporate.................................................................... 26,890 6,932 5,201
---------- ---------- ---------
$ 45,255 $ 101,468 $ 14,250
========== ========== =========
Long-lived assets
Business-to-business......................................................... $ 624 $ 783 $ 424
Business-to-consumer......................................................... 311 452 273
---------- ---------- ---------
Segment long-lived assets...................................................... 935 1,235 697
Corporate.................................................................... 640 206 400
---------- ---------- ---------
$ 1,575 $ 1,441 $ 1,097
========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
The remaining differences from the segment amounts to the consolidated
amounts relate principally to the corporate functions including administrative
costs, corporate cash and related interest income.
81
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
MICAL MORTGAGE, INC.
During fiscal 1998 and in anticipation of the May 19, 1998 acquisition of
Mical, FiNet advanced $1.9 million to Mical and utilized the Company's available
warehouse lines of credit to fund $42.8 million of loans originated by Mical.
Subsequently, these loans were sold and the proceeds used to repay the
associated warehouse debt.
IQUALIFY
On February 9, 1998, the Company purchased the outstanding common stock of
iQualify, Inc., a software developer, from T. Lee Decker and James Noack, former
employees and officers of FiNet, for a consideration of 50,000 shares of the
Company's common stock.
CONSULTING AGREEMENTS
The Company entered into a consulting agreement with James Umphryes, a
former Monument Mortgage stockholder. The contract term is 3 years beginning
January 1, 1997 at a monthly fee of $15,000 for a total contract cost of
$540,000. For fiscal 1999, 1998, and 1997, the Company incurred consulting fee
expense relating to this agreement of $180,000, $180,000 and $60,000,
respectively.
The Company and Dr. Lewis Meyer, a director of the Company, entered into a
consulting agreement in June 1998. Pursuant to the agreement, Dr. Meyer received
$25,000. In addition, Dr. Meyer paid FiNet $10,000 for warrants to purchase
1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. Twenty
percent of the shares became exercisable on the date of grant, and the remaining
shares become exercisable in quarterly installments over four years, so long as
Dr. Meyer's service with FiNet continues.
FACILITY LEASE
The Company leases a 3,500 square foot storage facility from James Noack,
former President of Monument Mortgage. The facility is utilized by the Company
to store excess office furniture. The monthly lease payment is $600 and the term
of the lease is on a month-to-month basis. For fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, rent
expense related to lease was $7,200 per year.
OTHER
During fiscal 1999, warrants to purchase 700,000 common shares at $1.25 per
share were purchased by three officers for cash consideration of $7,000.
In April 1999, the Company entered into a Lender Subscriber Agreement with
IMX, Inc. of which Richard Wilkes, a director of the Company, is president and
chief executive officer and of which FiNet's chief executive officer, Mark
Korell, is a minority shareholder. Pursuant to the agreement, IMX will provide
to the Company certain software and brokerage services.
On February 3, 1999, the Company and Jan C. Hoeffel, a current director and
the Company's former president, entered into a letter agreement concerning the
termination of his employment as a corporate officer. Pursuant to the agreement,
Mr. Hoeffel's employment terminated as of February 28, 1999. In consideration
for the issuance to him of 300,000 restricted shares of common stock,
Mr. Hoeffel agreed to forfeit any and all anti-dilution rights previously
granted him by the Company, and to surrender to the Company a warrant entitling
him to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock. The Company will continue to
make car lease payments on an automobile provided to Mr. Hoeffel for as long as
he serves as a director.
82
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
NOTE 18. VALUATION ALLOWANCES
Valuation allowances consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
BEGINNING COSTS AND ACQUIRED END OF
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES BUSINESS DEDUCTIONS PERIOD
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
MARKET VALUATION ALLOWANCE:
Year ended April 30, 1999........................... $ 396 $ 4,344 $ 542 $ (1,431) $ 3,851
Year ended April 30, 1998........................... 311 718 -- (633) 396
Year ended April 30, 1997........................... 135 226 -- (50) 311
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:
Year ended April 30, 1999........................... $ 36 $ 2,150 $ -- $ (36) $ 2,150
Year ended April 30, 1998........................... 56 -- -- (20) 36
Year ended April 30, 1997........................... 20 36 -- -- 56
</TABLE>
NOTE 19. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
The Company has a salary reduction 401(k) retirement savings plan (the
"Plan") covering all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements.
Employees may contribute up to 15% of their eligible compensation, subject to an
annual limit. The Plan provides that, at the Company's discretion, the Company
may make employer contributions. There were no employer contributions for fiscal
1999, 1998 or 1997.
NOTE 20. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to April 30, 1999, the Company received approximately
$43.0 million from the issuance of approximately 11.0 million shares of the
Company's stock in private placements.
The Company received an extension of its lending agreement from its primary
warehouse lender, RFC. The extension expires on July 9, 1999.
83
<PAGE>
FINET.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
APRIL 30, 1999
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN OR DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
On February 12, 1999, FiNet dismissed Reuben E. Price & Co. as its
independent accountant and, on February 12, 1999, appointed Ernst & Young LLP to
that position.
The reports of Reuben E. Price on FiNet's financial statements for the past
two fiscal years contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer, or were qualified
as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
The change in accountants was made in light of the recently expanded scope
of our operations and the attendant requirement for the accounting services of a
larger firm of national scope and stature. The decision to change independent
accountants was recommended by management and was approved by FiNet's Audit
Committee and Board of Directors.
During the Company's most recent two fiscal years and the subsequent interim
period there were no disagreements with Reuben E. Price on any matter of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing
scope or procedure.
84
<PAGE>
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference
from our definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference
from our definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference
to our definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference
to our definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(A)1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The information required by this Item appears in Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
(A)2 FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
See the Note 18 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for the
required information about Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. All other
schedules are omitted because they are not applicable.
(A)3 EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- -------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
3.1(1) Certificate of Amendment to the registrant's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated as of
October 29, 1997
3.2(2) Certificate of Amendment to the registrant's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated as of
May 28, 1999
3.3(3) Bylaws, as amended to date
4.1(4) Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao, dated
December 16, 1996
4.2(4) Form of Warrant Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
December 16, 1996
4.3(4) Form of Warrant issued to Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated December 16, 1996
4.4(4) Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors in the private placement
concluded December 31, 1996
</TABLE>
85
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- -------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
4.5(4) Form of Warrant Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
December 30, 1996
4.6(4) Form of Warrant issued to Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated December 30, 1996
4.7(4) Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
March 21, 1997
4.8(4) Form of Warrant Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
March 21, 1997
4.9(4) Form of Warrant issued to Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated March 21, 1997
4.10(4) Form of Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors in the private placement
concluded April 30, 1997
4.11(4) Form of Warrant Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
April 30, 1997
4.12(4) Form of Warrant Issued to investors in the private placement concluded April 30, 1997
4.13(4) Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors in the private placement
concluded October 31, 1997
4.14(4) Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to investors in the private placement concluded
October 31, 1997
4.15(5) Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors in the private placement
concluded December 23, 1998
4.16(5) Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to investors in the private placement concluded
December 23, 1998
4.17(6) Restructuring Agreement and Amendment, dated January 15, 1999, among the registrant and the investors
in the debenture offering concluded May 26, 1998
4.18(7) Form of Registration Rights Agreement between the registrant and investors in the debenture offering
concluded May 26, 1998
4.19(8) Form of Warrant issued to the investors in the debenture offering concluded May 26, 1998
4.20(5) Form of Stock Purchase Agreement among the registrant and the investors in the private placement
concluded on May 10, 1999 and May 20, 1999
4.21(5) Form of Stock Purchase Agreement among the registrant and the investors in the private placement
concluded on June 28, 1999
10.1(4) Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between the registrant and Monument Mortgage, Inc., dated
December 20, 1996
10.2(4) Consulting Agreement between the registrant and James Umphryes, dated January 1, 1997
10.3(5) 1989 Stock Option Plan
10.4(4) Asset Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Real Estate Office Software, Inc., dated
August 30, 1997
10.5(4) Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Coastal Federal Mortgage Company, dated
April 30, 1998
10.6(4) Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and MICAL Mortgage, Inc., dated May 19, 1998
10.7(5) 1998 Stock Option Plan
</TABLE>
86
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- -------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
10.8(5) 1998 Stock Bonus Incentive Plan
10.9(5) 1998 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
10.10(5) 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.11(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and L. Daniel Rawitch, as amended to date
10.12(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Michael G. Conway, as amended to date
10.13(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Gary A. Palmer, dated February 25, 1999
10.14(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Christos Skeadas, dated April 19, 1999
10.15(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Kevin Gillespie, dated March 5, 1999
10.16(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Thomas L. Porter, as amended to date
10.17(5) Employment Termination Agreement between the registrant and Jan C. Hoeffel, dated February 3, 1999
10.18(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Mark L. Korell, as amended to date
16.1(9) Letter from Former Certifying Accountant
21.1(5) List of Subsidiaries
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
23.2 Consent of Reuben E. Price & Co.
* 24.1 Power of Attorney
* 27.1 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Previously filed.
(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1998, filed on
August 13, 1998.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the registrant's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on June 2, 1999.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit of the same number filed with the
registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 1998, filed on August 13, 1998.
(5) Filed with the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on
July 2, 1999.
(6) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7.1 of the registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 1999.
(7) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 6, 1998.
(8) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7.2 of the registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 1999.
(9) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 of the registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 19, 1999.
87
<PAGE>
(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
During the quarter ended April 30, 1999, we filed one Current Report on Form
8-K announcing the change in our certifying accountants:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DATE ITEM DESCRIPTION
- -------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
February 19, 1999 5 Change in Registrant's Certifying Accountants
</TABLE>
88
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant, FiNet.com, Inc., a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, has duly caused this
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of San Ramon, State of California, on the
20th day of March 2000.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
FINET.COM, INC.
By: /s/ GARY A. PALMER
------------------------------------------
Gary A. Palmer
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- -------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
3.1(1) Certificate of Amendment to the registrant's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated as of
October 29, 1997
3.2(2) Certificate of Amendment to the registrant's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated as of
May 28, 1999
3.3(3) Bylaws, as amended to date
4.1(4) Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao, dated
December 16, 1996
4.2(4) Form of Warrant Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
December 16, 1996
4.3(4) Form of Warrant issued to Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated December 16, 1996
4.4(4) Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors in the private placement
concluded December 31, 1996
4.5(4) Form of Warrant Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
December 30, 1996
4.6(4) Form of Warrant issued to Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated December 30, 1996
4.7(4) Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
March 21, 1997
4.8(4) Form of Warrant Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
March 21, 1997
4.9(4) Form of Warrant issued to Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated March 21, 1997
4.10(4) Form of Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors in the private placement
concluded April 30, 1997
4.11(4) Form of Warrant Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Jose Maria Salema Garcao dated
April 30, 1997
4.12(4) Form of Warrant Issued to investors in the private placement concluded April 30, 1997
4.13(4) Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors in the private placement
concluded October 31, 1997
</TABLE>
89
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- -------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
4.14(4) Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to investors in the private placement concluded
October 31, 1997
4.15(5) Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors in the private placement
concluded December 23, 1998
4.16(5) Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to investors in the private placement concluded
December 23, 1998
4.17(6) Restructuring Agreement and Amendment, dated January 15, 1999, among the registrant and the investors
in the debenture offering concluded May 26, 1998
4.18(7) Form of Registration Rights Agreement between the registrant and investors in the debenture offering
concluded May 26, 1998
4.19(8) Form of Warrant issued to the investors in the debenture offering concluded May 26, 1998
4.20(5) Form of Stock Purchase Agreement among the registrant and the investors in the private placement
concluded on May 10, 1999 and May 20, 1999
4.21(5) Form of Stock Purchase Agreement among the registrant and the investors in the private placement
concluded on June 28, 1999
10.1(4) Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between the registrant and Monument Mortgage, Inc., dated
December 20, 1996
10.2(4) Consulting Agreement between the registrant and James Umphryes, dated January 1, 1997
10.3(5) 1989 Stock Option Plan
10.4(4) Asset Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Real Estate Office Software, Inc., dated
August 30, 1997
10.5(4) Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and Coastal Federal Mortgage Company, dated
April 30, 1998
10.6(4) Stock Purchase Agreement between the registrant and MICAL Mortgage, Inc., dated May 19, 1998
10.7(5) 1998 Stock Option Plan
10.8(5) 1998 Stock Bonus Incentive Plan
10.9(5) 1998 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
10.10(5) 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.11(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and L. Daniel Rawitch, as amended to date
10.12(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Michael G. Conway, as amended to date
10.13(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Gary A. Palmer, dated February 25, 1999
10.14(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Christos Skeadas, dated April 19, 1999
10.15(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Kevin Gillespie, dated March 5, 1999
10.16(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Thomas L. Porter, as amended to date
10.17(5) Employment Termination Agreement between the registrant and Jan C. Hoeffel, dated February 3, 1999
10.18(5) Employment Agreement between the registrant and Mark L. Korell, as amended to date
</TABLE>
90
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- -------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
16.1(9) Letter from Former Certifying Accountant
21.1(5) List of Subsidiaries
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
23.2 Consent of Reuben E. Price & Co.
* 24.1 Power of Attorney
* 27.1 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Previously filed.
(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1998, filed on
August 13, 1998.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the registrant's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on June 2, 1999.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit of the same number filed with the
registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 1998, filed on August 13, 1998.
(5) Filed with the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on
July 2, 1999.
(6) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7.1 of the registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 1999.
(7) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 6, 1998.
(8) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7.2 of the registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 1999.
(9) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 of the registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 19, 1999.
91
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the use of our report dated June 11, 1999 (except Note 20, as
to which the date is June 28, 1999), included in the Form 10-K of FiNet.com,
Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended April 30, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements, as amended, included in this Form 10-K/A.
[LOGO]
San Francisco, California
March 14, 2000
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.2
CONSENT OF REUBEN E. PRICE & CO., INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the use of our report dated August 12, 1998 included in the
Form 10-K/A of FiNet.com, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended April 30,
1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements, as amended, included
in this Form 10_K/A.
/s/ Reuben E. Price & Co.
San Francisco, California
March 18, 2000
