<PAGE> 1
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
[ X ] Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 [fee required] for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 or
[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 [no fee required] for the transition period
from to
-------- -------
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-10319
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
OHIO 31-0875005
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1000 WARREN AVENUE, NILES, OHIO 44446
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
</TABLE>
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: 330-544-7700
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- -----------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share New York Stock Exchange
</TABLE>
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
------ ------
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. X
------
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of March 2, 1998: $302,025,759. The amount shown is based on the
closing price of the registrant's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
that date. Shares of common stock known by the registrant to be beneficially
owned by officers or directors of the registrant or persons who have filed a
report on Schedule 13D or 13G are not included in the computation. The
registrant, however, has made no determination that such persons are
"affiliates" within the meaning of Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at March 2, 1998: 20,490,077.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Selected Portions of the 1998 Proxy Statement--Part III of this Report.
================================================================================
<PAGE> 2
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
As used in this report, the terms "RMI", "Company", and "Registrant" mean
RMI Titanium Company, its predecessors and consolidated subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, unless the context indicates otherwise.
------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C> <C>
PART I
Item 1. Business.................................................... 1
Item 2. Properties.................................................. 9
Item 3. Legal Proceedings........................................... 9
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 11
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters......................................... 12
Item 6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 13
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................... 13
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 22
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.................................... 39
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 39
Item 11. Executive Compensation...................................... 39
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management.................................................. 39
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 39
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and
Reports on Form 8-K......................................... 39
Signatures............................................................ 40
Index to Exhibits..................................................... 41
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
THE COMPANY
RMI is a leading U.S. producer of titanium mill and fabricated titanium
products for the global market. The Company's mill products are processed by
RMI's customers to provide products for use in the aerospace industry,
industrial markets, and consumer goods. The Company's fabricated products are
used primarily in the aerospace, oil and gas, geothermal energy production and
chemical process industries as well as for a number of other industrial
applications. The Company also provides fabrication and conversion services for
titanium and other specialty metals producers.
The Company is a successor to entities that have been operating in the
titanium industry since 1958. In 1990, USX and Quantum Chemical Corporation
("Quantum") transferred their entire ownership interest in the Company's
immediate predecessor, RMI Company, an Ohio general partnership, to the Company
in exchange for shares of Common Stock (the "Reorganization"). Quantum sold its
shares of Common Stock to the public while USX retained ownership of its shares.
At December 31, 1997, USX owned approximately 27% of the outstanding Common
Stock.
In November, 1996, USX Corporation completed a public offering of its notes
exchangeable February, 2000, for 5,483,600 shares of RMI Common Stock owned by
USX (or for an equivalent amount of cash at USX's option). Such shares represent
all of the RMI Common Stock owned by USX, and 27% of the outstanding shares of
RMI.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Titanium is one of the newest specialty metals. Its physical
characteristics include high strength-to-weight ratio, high temperature
performance and superior corrosion and erosion resistance. The first major
commercial application of titanium occurred in the early 1950's when it was used
as a component in aircraft gas turbine engines. Subsequent applications were
developed to use the material in other aerospace component parts and in airframe
construction.
A majority of the U.S. titanium industry's output is used in aerospace
applications such as aircraft bulkheads, wing support and carry-through
structures and jet engine components. In recent years, increased quantities of
the industry's output have been used in nonaerospace applications, including oil
and gas, geothermal energy production, chemical process industries and other
industrial applications.
Aerospace demand originates from two aerospace sectors: commercial and
military. Since 1987, commercial aerospace has been the dominant factor in
titanium demand. The commercial aerospace sector is expected to continue to
dominate the demand for titanium as a result of the expected growth of worldwide
airline traffic and the need to repair and replace aging commercial airline
fleets. Domestically, Boeing programs consume the majority of titanium used in
the commercial aerospace sector.
Historically, the cyclical nature of the aerospace industry has been the
principal cause of fluctuations in performance of companies engaged in the
titanium industry. The commercial aerospace sector is currently enjoying a
period of increased demand, the strongest and most robust demand period in the
history of the industry. Beginning in the second half of 1995 and continuing
into 1998, most major domestic and international commercial airlines have been
reporting strong operating profits. As profits improved, these carriers began to
place orders for new aircraft to replace their older and less efficient
aircraft. As a result, aircraft manufacturers began announcing major orders for
new aircraft and increases in their backlogs and build rates. Recently, Boeing
Company announced record production schedules for certain aircraft. Boeing and
others have forecasted that this increase in commercial aerospace activity may
continue for several more years or longer. However, RMI can offer no assurances
regarding future commercial aerospace activity or demand. As of December 31,
1997, the leading manufacturers of commercial aircraft, Boeing Company
(including the former McDonnell Douglas Corporation which was acquired by Boeing
in 1997) and Airbus Industrie, reported an aggregate of 2,753 planes under firm
order, and deliverable over the next five years. The comparable backlogs as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995 were 2,370 planes and 1,869 planes, respectively.
Military aerospace demand has remained at a relatively constant level during
this same period.
1
<PAGE> 4
As a result of the increased aerospace demand, and based on data published
by the U.S. Geological Survey, RMI estimates that total mill product shipments
from the domestic titanium industry totaled approximately 62 million pounds in
1997, the largest single shipping year in the history of the industry. 1996
shipments were approximately 57 million, and 1995 approximately 43 million
pounds. RMI's own shipments have also closely followed this industry trend, with
mill product shipments totaling 18.8 million pounds in 1997, 18.5 million pounds
in 1996, and 14.4 million pounds in 1995. RMI broadly estimates that domestic
industry mill product shipments to the commercial aerospace markets were
approximately 36 million pounds in 1997 compared to 27.5 million pounds in 1996
and 20 million pounds in 1995.
The following table highlights the cyclical nature of the titanium industry
by setting forth the total pounds of U.S. mill products shipped during the years
1979 through 1997 and the Company's shipments and average mill product prices
during such period.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Measurement Period RMI Avg. RMI Industry
(Fiscal Year Covered) Price Shipments Shipments
<S> <C> <C> <C>
'79 8.1 13 33
'80 12.2 14 39.5
'81 15.7 15 35
'82 16.3 10 28
'83 10.5 8.5 23.5
'84 10.0 13.7 31.3
'85 10.2 13.7 31.3
'86 9.6 13 29
'87 9.3 13.7 30.3
'88 10.7 14.5 34.5
'89 12.2 16 38
'90 13.1 16.5 34.5
'91 12.2 11.5 21.5
'92 11.3 11.5 23.5
'93 10.6 11.3 24.7
'94 9.9 11.6 23.4
'95 10.9 14.4 28.4
'96 11.88 18.5 38.6
'97 14.23 18.8 43.3
</TABLE>
PRODUCTS AND MARKETS
Titanium mill products consist of products such as ingot, slab, bloom,
billet, bar, plate, sheet, strip and welded tube. Fabricated products include
pipe, engineered tubular products, hot-formed and superplastically formed parts
for aerospace application, cut shapes and titanium metal powders. Other services
include conversion and fabrication services for other titanium and specialty
metal producers and project management. In addition, the Company acts as
contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") for the remediation and
restoration of one of the Company's closed facilities in Ashtabula, Ohio. Galt
Alloys, Inc., in which RMI acquired a 90% ownership interest during 1997, is a
manufacturer of specialty alloys for the ferrous and nonferrous industries.
2
<PAGE> 5
The amount of sales and the Company's consolidated percentage of
consolidated sales represented by each class of product during each of the years
beginning in 1993 was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RMI SALES
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
Mill Products................ $233.1 73% $203.7 81% $138.1 81% $103.8 72% $ 96.5 76%
Fabricated Products and
Other Services............. 60.6 19 37.2 15 26.9 16 31.1 22 20.5 16
Other (1).................... 24.8 8 10.5 4 6.2 3 8.5 6 10.4 8
------ --- ------ --- ------ --- ------ --- ------ ---
Total...................... $318.5 100% $251.4 100% $171.2 100% $143.4 100% $127.4 100%
====== === ====== === ====== === ====== === ====== ===
</TABLE>
- ---------
(1) Includes DOE remediation and restoration contract for each year, and Galt
Alloys, Inc. effective July 3, 1997.
MILL PRODUCTS
The Company produces a full range of titanium mill products which are used
in both the aerospace and nonaerospace markets.
Aerospace Business. Approximately 83% of the Company's 1997 mill product
sales were aerospace related compared with approximately 78% in 1996 and 75% in
1995. The Company's products are certified and approved for use by all major
domestic and most international manufacturers of commercial and military
aircraft and jet engines. Products such as sheet, plate, strip, bar, billet and
ingot, as well as related products such as hot-formed or superplastically formed
parts, are utilized in aircraft bulkheads, tail sections, wing support and
carry-through structures and various engine components including rotor blades,
vanes, discs, rings and engine cases.
As of December 31, 1997, the leading manufacturers of commercial aircraft,
Boeing Company, (including the former McDonnell Douglas Corporation which was
acquired by Boeing in 1997), and Airbus Industrie, reported an aggregate of
2,753 planes under firm order and deliverable over the next five years. The
commercial aircraft segment of the aerospace industry is currently enjoying
perhaps the most robust demand cycle in the history of the industry. In order to
meet increasing passenger load demands and the need to replace older and less
inefficient aircraft, commercial airlines, both domestic and international, have
been placing orders for new and replacement aircraft at near record levels. The
comparable backlogs as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 were 2,370 planes, and
1,869 planes, respectively. Included in the backlog for December 31, 1997 are
364 firm orders for the new Boeing 777 wide-body aircraft, which requires more
titanium than any other commercial aircraft. Deliveries of commercial aircraft
by these manufacturers totaled 557 in 1997, 345 in 1996, and 380 in 1995.
Because it typically takes from 12 to 18 months from placement of an order until
delivery of a commercial aircraft, realized delivery rates generally lag behind
announced backlog estimates. In addition, changing global and industry economic
conditions in both the international and domestic commercial airline industries
could cause manufacturers to re-evaluate aircraft orders and options, thus
affecting realized aircraft delivery rates. On February 2, 1998, RMI signed an
agreement with Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group to supply up to 4.5 million
pounds of titanium products annually at fixed prices to Boeing and its family of
suppliers. The agreement, which begins in 1999, will have an initial term of
five years, and may be extended for an additional five years. Boeing will
receive firm prices in exchange for RMI receiving a minimum volume of 3.25
million pounds, or approximately 50% of 1997 Boeing related shipments.
Nonaerospace. Principal nonaerospace mill products include commercially
pure (unalloyed) strip, welded tube and plate used for chemical processing and
pulp and paper equipment. Bar is sold for the production of medical implants and
high-performance automotive engine parts. The Company is also a supplier of
commercially pure titanium plate and strip, which offers superior corrosion
resistance and ductility for critical forming and metal expansion required in
applications such as heat exchangers and anodes for the chlorine industry.
Nonaerospace sales accounted for 17% of the Company's mill product sales in
1997, 22% in 1996 and 25% in 1995.
3
<PAGE> 6
FABRICATED PRODUCTS AND OTHER SERVICES
Fabricated products include pipe, engineered tubular products for the oil
and gas and geothermal energy production industries, hot-formed and
superplastically formed parts and cut shapes for aerospace applications and
titanium metal powders. Titanium powders are used for alloy additions,
superconductors, grain refinement of other metals and titanium powder metal
parts. Other services include conversion and fabrication services for other
titanium and specialty metals producers and project management. Revenues from
fabricated products and other services accounted for 19% of RMI's sales in 1997,
15% in 1996 and 16% in 1995. Sales to the aerospace market represented 76%, 66%
and 51% of such revenues in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, with sales to the
nonaerospace market representing the balance.
The Company has, and continues to devote significant resources in
developing new applications and markets for titanium in the oil and gas and
geothermal energy production industries. Sales to the oil and gas and geothermal
energy production industries were 2% of RMI's sales in 1997, 1% of RMI's sales
in 1996 and 3% of RMI's sales in 1995.
The Company was awarded a contract to supply all of the seamless titanium
pipe required for a number of geothermal energy production facilities located in
the Imperial Valley of California. Deliveries under the contract are expected to
be made through the second quarter of 1998. RMI anticipates receiving additional
orders for seamless geothermal pipe.
During 1995, the Company completed and shipped the world's first
high-pressure titanium drilling riser for use in the Conoco Heidrun project, one
of the world's largest floating, deep-water oil and gas production platforms.
The Company has also received several orders to supply titanium stress joints
for use in the Oryx Energy Neptune Production Riser System in the Gulf of
Mexico. The success of these applications has prompted other worldwide energy
companies to consider a number of engineered all titanium and hybrid
titanium/steel systems.
The Company continues to work closely with several oil companies and
engineering concerns to develop other titanium projects or applications in the
oil and gas and geothermal energy production industries. RMI has entered into
several cooperative ventures to encourage and develop titanium products for use
in the oil and gas industry. For example, the Company has entered into an
agreement with Stolt Comex Seaway SA ("Stolt Comex"), a Norwegian-based
diversified contractor to the offshore oil and gas industry, to combine RMI's
and Stolt Comex's expertise to market, engineer, fabricate and install titanium
production risers, flow lines and other titanium subsea systems. RMI and Stolt
Comex recently initiated a joint industry project ("JIP") to provide definitive
data on the design, engineering, manufacture and installation of titanium riser
systems for offshore floating production platforms. This JIP will provide the
participants with a road map for the use of metallic riser systems utilizing
titanium. Due to their interest in these systems a number of major oil companies
are participating in and providing funding for this JIP. Another of the
Company's alliance partners, Energy Ventures, Inc., is working with RMI on the
development of titanium drill pipe for use in horizontal and extended reach
drilling applications.
RMI's new market efforts are also focusing on the emerging market for
lightweight titanium armor. With reduced force levels worldwide, it has become
increasingly important for the military to improve the transportability of its'
equipment. The use of titanium armor in place of steel is one way to
significantly reduce weight while maintaining good ballistic properties. RMI is
already supplying armor plate, under a long-term contract, for retrofit of armor
components on the Army's M1/A1 Abrams tank. This contract represents
approximately one-half of the titanium armor plate utilized in the United
States. RMI believes that applications such as this will increase in the future
and could represent a significant growth opportunity for titanium. Continued
realization and growth in this area will depend on a number of factors including
the affordability of titanium for these applications and future military
spending budgets.
In the first quarter of 1998, RMI announced an agreement with NKK Titanium
U.S.A., a subsidiary of NKK, Japan's second largest steel company, to develop,
produce and market titanium mill products from SP 700, NKK's patented alloy,
throughout North America, South America, and Europe. The SP 700 alloy has
superior forming characteristics compared to currently available titanium
alloys. The alloy can be fabricated or formed to near-net shape at low
temperatures, reducing the cost of producing the titanium component. This
4
<PAGE> 7
superior formability, combined with excellent strength properties, makes the
alloy attractive for applications ranging from golf clubs to critical airframe
structures and rotating jet engine fan blades.
OTHER
The Company has a long-term agreement with the DOE covering the remediation
and restoration of one of the Company's closed facilities in Ashtabula, Ohio,
for which the DOE is responsible as a result of work performed there by the
Company for the U.S. government. The Company is serving as the prime contractor
during the remediation and restoration period. Year-to-year revenues and the
time of completion of the project will depend on DOE funding. In 1997, the
Company recognized $13.2 million in such revenues compared to $10.5 million in
1996 and $6.2 million in 1995. As the prime contractor, the Company provides
management services necessary to complete assessment, clean-up and remediation
activities. In October, 1997, RMI announced the formation of a new company for
the purpose of offering such remediation and reclamation services to government,
industrial, and commercial markets. The new company, Earthline Technologies LLC
is a 50/50 joint venture with Geraghty & Miller, Inc. of Denver, Colorado. This
new company, which expects to begin operating in July, 1998, will focus on
deploying jointly developed and contributed processes and technologies to
environmental restoration and waste management markets that offer cost benefit,
waste minimization, and accelerated clean-up opportunity compared to traditional
methods.
On July 3, 1997, the Company acquired 90% of the common stock of Galt
Alloys, Inc., a manufacturer of ferro titanium and a producer and worldwide
distributor of specialty alloys to ferrous and nonferrous customers. In
connection with this transaction, Galt is undertaking a major expansion program
estimated to cost approximately $20 million, designed to enable Galt to better
serve the titanium industry and its customers. The expansion will include a new
scrap preparation facility, and plasma consolidation furnace, and a plasma
hearth furnace. Additionally, to meet increased demand for its products, in
October 1997 Galt undertook an expansion of its ferro alloy operations. Galt's
sales were included in RMI's consolidated sales effective with the date of the
acquisition.
Other sales amounted to approximately 8% of net sales in 1997, compared to
4% in 1996 and 3% in 1995.
EXPORTS
The majority of the Company's exports consist of titanium mill products
used in aerospace markets. Other exports include slab, commercially pure strip,
plate and welded tubing used in nonaerospace markets. The Company's export sales
were 19% of sales in 1997, compared to 17% and 18% of sales in 1996 and 1995,
respectively. Such sales were made primarily to the European market, where the
Company believes it is a leader in supplying alloy flat-rolled titanium mill
products as well as rotating-quality billet. Most of the Company's export sales
are made in U.S. dollars, which minimizes exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations.
As a leading supplier of alloy flat-rolled titanium mill products to the
European market, the Company has worked through its distributors to secure
contracts to furnish mill products to the major European aerospace
manufacturers. As a result, the Company has significant export sales to
customers in France, the United Kingdom and Germany. In order to enhance its
presence in the European market, in 1992 the Company acquired a 40% ownership
interest in its French distributor, Reamet, SA. In addition, the Company has
expanded its operations in the United Kingdom to include a distribution and
service center facility in Birmingham, England. Operations at the facility
commenced during the second quarter of 1995, and have exhibited steady growth
since that time. In 1996, the Company became a qualified supplier to Rolls Royce
Plc and has received orders to supply material from the Birmingham facility for
use in fan blades and other critical rotating parts in Rolls Royce's family of
jet engines. In January, 1998 RMI, through its French affiliate, Reamet, was
chosen by Aerospatiale as the major supplier of the titanium flat rolled
products required for its Airbus programs beginning in 1999 and extending
through 2001.
BACKLOG
For a discussion of order backlog, see "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
5
<PAGE> 8
RAW MATERIALS
The principal raw materials used in the production of titanium mill
products are titanium sponge, a porous metallic material; titanium scrap; and
alloying agents. RMI acquires its raw materials from a number of suppliers, both
domestic and foreign, under long-term contracts and other negotiated
transactions. The Company purchased approximately 20 million pounds of titanium
sponge in 1997 and approximately 15 million pounds of titanium sponge in 1996.
Based on current levels of customer demand and production schedules, the Company
estimates its 1998 sponge purchases will approximate 19-22 million pounds.
Requirements for sponge vary based upon product mix and the level of scrap
usage.
Following the closure of its sponge production facilities in 1992, the
Company began purchasing its titanium sponge from lower cost outside sources.
The Company has entered into two long-term sponge supply arrangements. In
addition, the Company supplements its metal requirements with additional sponge
and raw material purchases, including titanium scrap, from other U.S. and
foreign suppliers.
One of the sponge contracts, which is with a competing producer of mill
products, permits the Company to purchase up to seven million pounds per year at
specified prices per pound during 1998, and thereafter through 2003 at the
Company's option at either market price (but not below the supplier's cost) or
the price in effect under the contract plus adjustments for changes in certain
of the supplier's costs, such as labor, electricity and raw materials. The other
contract, which is with a Japanese supplier, permits the Company to purchase up
to four million pounds of sponge per year through 2005, either at market price
or the price in effect under the contract plus changes in certain of the
suppliers' costs, such as labor, electricity and raw materials. In addition,
this contract permits the Company to purchase up to an additional four million
pounds of sponge at negotiated prices. These contracts are subject to
renegotiation or termination under certain circumstances. The Company purchases
the balance of its sponge requirements pursuant to short-term agreements or at
negotiated prices. Prices for the Company's 1998 requirements have already been
set under these contracts and other short-term arrangements. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
In November 1996, the Company was notified that the Department of Commerce
had issued a final determination that dumping did not occur on sales of titanium
sponge made by Interlink, a major trading company for Russian produced titanium
sponge. The Company purchases nearly all of its Russian titanium sponge through
Interlink. These purchases previously carried an 84% dumping duty. The
no-dumping finding eliminated the duty, and has allowed the Company to purchase
a significant portion of its titanium sponge at lower prices.
On July 3, 1997, the Company acquired 90% of the common stock of Galt
Alloys, Inc., a manufacturer of ferro titanium and a producer and worldwide
distributor of specialty alloys to ferrous and nonferrous customers. In
connection with this transaction, Galt is undertaking a major expansion program
estimated to cost approximately $20 million, designed to enable Galt to better
serve the titanium industry and its customers, and to provide RMI with an
increased supply of scrap and consumable titanium electrodes for remelt at lower
cost and easier to use sizes and shapes. When completed, the expansion will
enable RMI to 1) increase the utilization of scrap (a strategic objective)
particularly the use of titanium turnings; 2) utilize available capacity in its
finish melting facilities thereby increasing RMI's ability to make and ship mill
products; and 3) reduce its purchase of higher cost hearth melting services from
third parties. The expansion will include a new scrap preparation facility, and
plasma consolidation furnace, and a plasma hearth furnace. RMI's investment in
Galt amounts to an initial cash investment of $3 million and an agreement to
invest an additional $17 million over the period required to complete the
expansion referred to above which is expected to be approximately 18-24 months.
Additionally, to meet increased demand for its products, in October, 1997, Galt
undertook an expansion of its own ferro alloy operations. Cost of the expansion
is estimated to be approximately $1.5 million which is expected to be funded
from operating cash flow.
The Company purchases titanium tetrachloride, the primary raw material used
in the manufacture of titanium sponge, from Millennium Inorganic Chemicals
pursuant to a long-term supply agreement expiring in 2003. Titanium
tetrachloride is shipped to one of the Company's long-term sponge suppliers
where it is used in providing sponge for the Company.
6
<PAGE> 9
The Company believes it has adequate sources for titanium sponge, scrap,
alloying agents and other raw materials.
COMPETITION AND OTHER MARKET FACTORS
The titanium metals industry is highly competitive on a worldwide basis.
Competition is primarily on the basis of price, quality and timely delivery.
Titanium also competes with other metals such as stainless steel and nickel
based corrosion resistant alloys. A metal manufacturing company with rolling and
finishing facilities could participate in the mill product segment of the
titanium industry. However, entry into the titanium industry at a greenfield
site would require a significant investment of capital and extensive technical
expertise.
Producers of titanium mill products are located primarily in the U.S.,
Japan, Russia, Europe and China. Currently, all domestic producers manufacture
mill products, at least in part, from purchased sponge, scrap or ingot. Oregon
Metallurgical Corporation (Oremet) (which is being acquired by Allegheny
Teledyne, Inc.) and Titanium Metals Corporation of America (Timet) produce a
portion of their own sponge.
Imports of titanium mill products from countries that receive the
most-favored-nation ("MFN") tariff rate are subject to a 15% tariff. The tariff
rate applicable to imports from countries that do not receive MFN treatment is
45%. Japanese producers, which benefit from MFN treatment, participate
significantly in the European market, but historically have not been a major
factor in the U.S. mill products market. The United States currently grants MFN
treatment to imports, including titanium mill product imports, from the former
Soviet Union countries, including Russia. Effective October 18, 1993, the U.S.
Government extended the benefits of the Generalized System of Preferences
("GSP") to Russia. Under GSP, the U.S. grants duty-free access to semifinished
and agricultural products from developing countries and territories. Certain
wrought titanium products are covered by GSP up to certain competitive needs
based limits, which effectively restrict the volume of imports for these
products. However, unwrought products such as titanium sponge, ingot and billet
have not yet been afforded GSP treatment. In 1995, a Russian producer began to
participate in the U.S. market for titanium mill products. This titanium
producer has the largest rated capacity in the world (although management
believes practical capacity is substantially less).
In the second half of 1997, this Russian producer filed two separate
petitions under the trade laws. The first seeks GSP treatment for unwrought
products from Russia (sponge, powders, ingot and billet). The second petition
seeks removal of the competitive needs limit for wrought products (plate, sheet,
pipe, etc.). The competitive needs limit was actually exceeded by this producer
in 1997.
The Company, together with others in the titanium industry, are vigorously
contesting the granting of these petitions. The ultimate outcome of the actions
cannot be accurately predicted at this time. A final decision is expected during
the middle of 1998. RMI believes that any significant increase in the imports of
titanium mill products from Russia could materially affect competition in the
domestic titanium industry.
MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
RMI markets its titanium mill products and related products and services
worldwide. Approximately 80% of the company's sales are made through its own
sales force and the balance through independent distributors. RMI's domestic
sales force has offices in Niles, Ohio; Houston, Texas; Brea, California;
Washington, Missouri; and Salt Lake City, Utah. RMI also distributes and
services its products in Europe from its Birmingham, UK facility and its French
affiliate, Reamet, SA. Technical marketing personnel are available to service
these offices and to assist in new product applications and development. In
addition, the Company's Customer Technical Service and Research and Development
Departments, both located in Niles, Ohio, provide extensive customer support.
RESEARCH, TECHNICAL AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
The Company conducts research, technical and product development activities
at facilities in Niles, Ohio. The principal goals of the Company's research
program are maintaining technical expertise in the production of titanium mill
and fabricated products and providing technical support in the development of
new markets and products. In addition to the Company's own funding, certain
major customers have assisted in
7
<PAGE> 10
funding the Company's development of specific titanium applications. Research,
technical and product development costs totaled $3.7 million in each of 1997 and
1996, and $3.4 million in 1995. Customer assisted funding, which is treated as a
reduction of research and development spending, reduced the Company's portion of
research and development expense to $3.1 million in 1997, $2.1 million in 1996
and $1.8 million in 1995.
The Company has research laboratories in Niles with melting, metal
processing and metal testing facilities and a corrosion laboratory for support
of nonaerospace markets.
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
The Company possesses a substantial body of technical know-how and trade
secrets and owns a number of U.S. patents applicable primarily to product
formulations and uses. The Company considers its know-how, trade secrets and
patents important to conduct its business, although no individual item is
considered to be material to the Company's current business.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1997, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 1,105
persons, 245 of whom were classified as administrative and sales personnel. At
December 31, 1997, 84 of the 1,105 employees were directly involved with the DOE
remediation and restoration contract at the Company's now closed facilities in
Ashtabula, Ohio.
The United Steelworkers of America ("USWA") represents 511 of the hourly
and clerical and technical employees at the Company's plant in Niles, Ohio, and
the hourly employees at the closed facilities in Ashtabula, Ohio. Other than six
hourly workers at the Ashtabula facilities, who are represented by the Oil,
Chemicals and Atomic Workers Union, the Company's other employees are not
represented by a union. In October 1995, following a five day work stoppage, a
three-year labor agreement was reached with the USWA represented employees at
Niles. The contract expires on September 30, 1998. The Company anticipates
entering into negotiations for a new labor agreement in the summer of 1998, and
is hopeful of reaching a mutually satisfactory agreement prior to expiration of
the contract. The hourly employees at the facilities in Ashtabula agreed to a
five-year contract on January 15, 1996.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Listed below are the executive officers of the Company together with their
ages, as of December 31, 1997, and titles.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE TITLE
---- --- -----
<S> <C> <C>
Dawne S. Hickton....................... 40 Vice President and General Counsel
John H. Odle........................... 55 Executive Vice President
Timothy G. Rupert...................... 51 Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Harry B. Watkins....................... 59 Vice President--Technical Marketing & Tubular Group
</TABLE>
Ms. Hickton was elected Vice President and General Counsel in June 1997.
She began her career in the Law Department of USX Corporation in 1983, and
served as General Attorney from 1992-1994. From 1994 to 1997, she was a Clinical
Professor of Law at The University of Pittsburgh School of Law and was
associated with the Pittsburgh firm of Burns, White and Hickton in an Of Counsel
capacity.
Mr. Odle was elected Executive Vice President in June 1996. He previously
was Senior Vice President-Commercial of RMI and its predecessor since 1989 and
served as Vice President-Commercial from 1981 until 1989. Prior to that, Mr.
Odle served as General Manager-Sales. He began his career as a commercial
management trainee in 1964 with USX. He is also a Director of the Company.
Mr. Rupert was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
in June 1996 and had served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since
September 1991. Prior to joining RMI, Mr. Rupert
8
<PAGE> 11
was employed by USX for 23 years in various accounting and finance positions. He
is also a Director of the Company.
Mr. Watkins was elected to his present position of Vice President on April
25, 1996. Previously, he held a number of managerial and sales positions with
RMI beginning in 1985. Mr. Watkins was employed by USX Corporation for 24 years.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
MANUFACTURING FACILITIES
The Company has over 750,000 square feet of manufacturing facilities
exclusive of office space, located primarily in Niles, Ohio. The Company's
principal manufacturing plants, the principal products produced at such plants
and their aggregate capacities are set forth below.
MANUFACTURING FACILITIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL RATED
LOCATION PRODUCTS CAPACITY
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Niles, Ohio Ingot (million pounds).................................... 36
Niles, Ohio Mill Products (million pounds)............................ 22
Hermitage, PA Tube (thousand pounds).................................... 780
Washington, MO Hot-Formed and Superplastically Formed Components
Sullivan, MO (thousand press hours).................................... 21
Salt Lake City, UT Powders (million pounds).................................. 1.5
Canton, Ohio Ferro titanium and specialty alloys (million pounds)...... 16
</TABLE>
The Company owns all of the foregoing facilities, except for the Canton,
Ohio and Sullivan, Missouri facilities and certain buildings and property at
Washington, Missouri, all of which are leased. The plants have been constructed
at various times over a long period, many of the buildings have been remodeled
or expanded and additional buildings have been constructed from time to time.
CONVERSION SERVICES
The Company utilizes third-party converters to melt and/or finish
approximately 35% of its mill products. The use of these converters raises the
Company's effective processing capacity. Certain mill products, such as hot band
and cold rolled strip and oversized plate, are produced entirely by such
converters using semi-finished titanium mill products supplied by the Company.
The Company, however, is responsible for inspecting and delivering these
products to customers. The Company maintains long-term relationships with many
of these conversion companies. The Company believes that, if necessary, it could
obtain alternative sources for conversion services.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims
arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. Given the
critical nature of many of the aerospace end uses for the Company's products,
including specifically their use in critical rotating parts of gas turbine
engines, the Company maintains aircraft products liability insurance of $250
million, which includes grounding liability.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The Company is subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and
regulations concerning environmental matters. In 1997 the Company spent
approximately $1.3 million on environmental-related expenditures. During each of
1996 and 1995, the Company spent approximately $0.6 million for
environmental-related expenditures. The Company broadly estimates
environmental-related expenditures, including capital items and compliance
costs, will total approximately $4.0 million during the 1998-2000 period.
In connection with the Reorganization, the Company assumed all
responsibility for environmental matters relating to RMI Company and its
immediate predecessor, Reactive Metals, Inc., which commenced
9
<PAGE> 12
business on April 1, 1964, and agreed to indemnify Quantum and USX against any
liability relating to such environmental matters. Quantum and USX have been
named as potentially responsible parties in connection with the Fields Brook
Superfund site discussed below. In addition, Quantum initially acquired the
Company's now closed Ashtabula facilities in 1950, which it owned until 1964,
when they were acquired by Reactive Metals, Inc. Although the Company believes
it may have claims with respect to possible remediation and other costs against
Quantum for the pre-1964 period, ultimate apportionment of any liability between
the Company and Quantum has not been finally agreed upon.
Active Investigative or Cleanup Sites. The Company is involved in
investigative or cleanup projects at certain waste disposal sites, including
those discussed below.
Fields Brook Superfund Site. The Company, together with 31 other
companies, has been identified by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency the
("EPA") as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") under Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") with respect
to a superfund site defined as the Fields Brook Watershed in Ashtabula, Ohio,
which includes the Company's now closed Ashtabula facilities. The EPA's 1986
estimate of the cost of remediation of the Fields Brook sediment operable unit
was $48 million. Recent studies, together with improved remediation technology
and redefined cleanup standards, have resulted in a more recent estimate of the
remediation cost of approximately $25 million. The actual cost of remediation
may vary from the estimate depending upon any number of factors.
The EPA, beginning in March 1989, ordered 22 of the PRPs to conduct a
design phase study for the sediment operable unit and a source control study.
These studies are nearly complete. The Company, working cooperatively with
fourteen others, is complying with the order and has accrued and has been paying
its portion of the cost of such compliance. It is anticipated that the studies
will be completed no earlier than mid 1998. Actual cleanup is not expected to
commence prior to 1999. The Company's share of the study costs has been
established at 9.95%. In June, 1995, the Company and twelve others entered into
a Phase 2 (actual cleanup) allocation agreement which assigns 9.44% of the cost
to RMI. However, actual percentages may be more or less based on contributions
from other parties which are not currently participating in the Phase 2
allocation agreement.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA")
Proceedings-Ashtabula Sodium Plant. The Company, through its independent
environmental consultant, has identified and reported to the EPA the presence of
metals and hazardous organic materials on portions of its closed facilities in
Ashtabula, Ohio. As to the organic material, the consultant has determined it
originates from an off-site source, and the Company does not anticipate it will
be required to clean up this material.
A Corrective Measures Study report prepared for the Company by the
consultant states that the presence of metals would not be expected to have an
adverse impact on humans or the environment, and, after conducting a detailed
analysis of cleanup alternatives, the study recommended that metals contaminated
material be consolidated at an on-site landfill and contained in place, at an
estimated cost of $1 million. The EPA has approved the Corrective Measures Study
but has not yet selected a cleanup alternative. The Company has accrued an
amount for this matter.
Ashtabula River. The Ashtabula River and Harbor has been designated one of
43 Areas of Concern on the Great Lakes by the International Joint Commission.
Fields Brook empties into the Ashtabula River, which in turn flows into Lake
Erie. The State of Ohio has appropriated $7 million in state funds to the
Ashtabula River dredging project to assist in securing federal funds needed to
conduct the dredging.
The Company believes it is most appropriate to use public funds to cleanup
a site with regional environmental and economic development implications such as
the Ashtabula River and Harbor. The Ashtabula River Partnership ("ARP"), a
voluntary group of public and private entities including, among others, the
Company, the EPA, and the Ohio EPA, was formed in July 1994 to bring about the
remediation of the river. The ARP is working both to design a cost-effective
remedy and to secure public funding. Phase 1, the Comprehensive Management Plan,
is well underway and is completely funded with public money. To fund Phase 2,
the Detailed Design, the Company and the 14 other PRPs who are cooperating at
the Fields Brook Superfund site collectively have pledged a voluntary
contribution of $1 million over two years, contingent upon
10
<PAGE> 13
receiving matching Federal funds. In 1996, $0.5 million in matching Federal
funds was granted. It is possible that the EPA could determine that the
Ashtabula River and Harbor should be designated as an extension of the Fields
Brook Superfund site, or, alternatively, as a separate Superfund site. It is not
possible at this time to predict the methods or responsibility for any
remediation and whether the Company will have any liability for any costs
incurred in cleaning up the Ashtabula River and Harbor. The Fields Brook PRP
group has indicated to the Ashtabula River Partnership the groups willingness to
participate in funding in exchange for a release from CERCLA liability.
With respect to each of the above sites, all of which are located in Ohio,
the State of Ohio may assert its interests and rights independent of those of
the EPA. The Company has notified all its insurers relative to the environmental
claims reported above and has demanded that the insurers assume the Company's
defense of such claims and indemnify the Company against such claims. During
1993, the Company settled a claim with one insurer for $0.4 million. None of the
remaining insurers have agreed to defend or indemnify the Company, and several
have denied coverage. However, the Company continues to pursue these claims with
its insurers.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of these sites, and the
evolving nature of environmental laws, regulations, and remediation techniques,
the Company's ultimate obligation for investigative and remediation costs cannot
be predicted. It is the Company's policy to recognize in its financial
statements environmental costs as an obligation becomes probable and a
reasonable estimate of exposure can be determined. At December 31, 1997, the
amount accrued for future environmental-related costs was $2.8 million. Based on
available information, RMI believes that its share of potential
environmental-related costs, before expected contributions from third parties,
is in a range from $3.9 to $6.7 million in the aggregate. The amount accrued is
net of expected contributions from third parties (which does not include any
amounts from insurers) of approximately $2.1 million which the Company believes
are probable. The Company has been receiving contributions from such third
parties for a number of years as partial reimbursement for costs incurred by the
Company. As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts in
excess of those already provided may be necessary to discharge the Company from
its obligations for these sites.
The ultimate resolution of the foregoing contingencies could, individually
or in the aggregate, be material to the consolidated financial statements.
However, management believes that RMI will remain a viable and competitive
enterprise even though it is possible these matters could be resolved
unfavorably.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
11
<PAGE> 14
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
COMMON STOCK DATA:
Principal market for common stock: New York Stock Exchange
Holders of record of common stock at January 31, 1998: 936
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS FOR 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DIVIDEND
QUARTER HIGH LOW DECLARED
------- ---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
First........................................... $28 $17 1/2 $--
Second.......................................... 28 20 --
Third........................................... 29 9/16 20 1/16 --
Fourth.......................................... 26 3/16 16 1/2 --
Year............................................ $29 9/16 $16 1/2 $--
</TABLE>
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS FOR 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DIVIDEND
QUARTER HIGH LOW DECLARED
------- ---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
First........................................... $16 1/2 $ 7 7/8 $--
Second.......................................... 24 3/4 14 --
Third........................................... 28 1/2 18 3/4 --
Fourth.......................................... 28 1/8 21 --
Year............................................ $28 1/2 $ 7 7/8 $--
</TABLE>
On May 7, 1996, the Company completed a Common Stock Offering of 4,600,000
shares at a price of $18.50 per share. Net proceeds to the Company, after
deducting underwriting fees and expenses, amounted to $80.3 million.
The Company has not paid dividends on its Common Stock since the second
quarter of 1991. The declaration of dividends is at the discretion of the Board
of Directors of the Company. The declaration and payment of future dividends and
the amount thereof will be dependent upon the Company's results of operations,
financial condition, cash requirements for its business, future prospects and
other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.
12
<PAGE> 15
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FIVE YEAR SUMMARY
Years Ended December 31
(Dollars in thousands except for per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Sales................................ $318,530 $251,357 $171,166 $143,392 $127,397
Operating income(loss)............... 56,315 33,730 (5,220)(1) (7,971) (10,764)
Income (loss) before cumulative
effect of a change in accounting
principle.......................... 57,317 31,659 (4,608)(3) (11,562) (11,955)
Net income (loss).................... 60,085(2) 31,759 (4,608)(3) (12,764)(4) (28,893)(5)
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
(at end of period)
Working Capital...................... $184,824 $132,136 $ 86,738 $ 74,694 $ 66,319
Total assets......................... 291,309 215,880 171,559 160,810 152,647
Long-term debt....................... -- 3,600 64,020 54,740 66,660
Equity............................... 221,173 158,736(6) 36,889 42,596(7) 27,861
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
(8)
Before change in accounting
principle.......................... $ 2.94 $ 1.71 $ (0.30) $ (1.45) $ (8.14)
Net income (loss):
Basic.............................. $ 2.94 $ 1.71 $ (0.30) $ (1.60) $ (19.67)
Diluted............................ 2.92 1.70 (0.30) (1.60) (19.67)
</TABLE>
- ---------
(1) Includes a $5.0 million charge reflecting the June 30, 1995 adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 121.
(2) Includes a $8.7 million income tax benefit. See Note 8 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
(3) Includes a $5.0 million charge reflecting the adoption of SFAS No. 121 and a
$7.2 million income tax benefit.
(4) Includes a $1.2 million charge reflecting the adoption of SFAS No. 112.
(5) Includes a $16.9 million charge reflecting the adoption of SFAS No. 106.
(6) Includes a $80.3 million increase resulting from the net proceeds of a
common stock offering.
(7) Includes a $26.4 million increase resulting from the net proceeds of a
rights offering.
(8) 1993 Common Share data has been adjusted to reflect a March 31, 1994
one-for-ten reverse stock split.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in connection with the information
contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Selected Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. The following information contains
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are subject to the safe harbor created by
that Act. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation,
statements regarding the future availability and prices of raw materials, the
competitiveness of the titanium industry, demand for the Company's products, the
historic cyclicality of the titanium and aerospace industries, uncertain defense
spending, long-term supply agreements, the ultimate determination of pending
trade petitions, global economic conditions, the Company's order backlog and the
conversion of that backlog into revenue, and other statements contained herein
that are not historical facts. Because such forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties there are important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. These and other risk factors are set forth below in
the "Outlook" section, as well as having been described in the Company's other
filings
13
<PAGE> 16
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") over the last 12 months,
copies of which are available from the SEC or may be obtained upon request from
the Company.
OVERVIEW
Historically, a majority of the U.S. titanium industry's output has been
used in aerospace applications. The cyclical nature of the aerospace industry
has been the principal cause of the fluctuations in performance of companies
engaged in the titanium industry. During the 19 year period from 1979 through
1997, the performance of the titanium industry has closely mirrored the cyclical
pattern of the aerospace industry. During the period, domestic titanium industry
mill product shipments have ranged from a low of approximately 32 million pounds
in 1983 to approximately 62 million pounds in 1997. RMI's mill product shipments
have also followed this trend, with shipments ranging from approximately 9
million pounds in 1983 to 18.8 million in 1997. The average realized selling
price for mill products during the period has also fluctuated based on demand,
lower in periods of reduced demand and higher in periods of peak demand.
During the last three years, commercial aerospace markets have shown a
significant increase in demand while military aerospace markets have stabilized
at the reduced build rate levels. In the 1995-1997 period, most major commercial
airlines reported stronger operating profits and, during this same period,
aircraft manufacturers increased build rates. As of December 31, 1997, the
leading manufacturers of commercial aircraft, Boeing Company and Airbus
Industrie, reported an aggregate of 2,753 planes under firm order and
deliverable over the next five years. The comparable backlogs as of December 31,
1996 and 1995 were 2,370 planes and 1,869 planes, respectively. The Company
estimates that industry mill products shipments to the commercial aerospace
market in 1997 were approximately 36 million pounds, an increase of
approximately 31% compared to 1996. Total industry shipments in 1997 were
approximately 62 million pounds, the largest single shipping year in the history
of the industry. RMI can give no assurance as to the extent or duration of the
recovery in the commercial aerospace market or the extent to which such recovery
will continue to result in increased demand for titanium products.
In response to adverse industry-wide conditions the Company closed its
sponge production facilities in early 1992, which allowed the Company to stem
immediately the significant losses generated at these plants, as well as achieve
the flexibility to purchase titanium sponge and other raw materials, such as
foreign or domestic scrap, at favorable prices. The Company entered into two
long-term titanium sponge supply arrangements which assure a supply of a
substantial portion of the Company's expected sponge requirements. Prices for
the Company's 1998 requirements have been set under these contracts and other
short term arrangements. Raw material prices are a significant factor in the
overall cost of production of the Company's titanium mill products. RMI has
instituted raw material escalator and surcharge clauses on most incoming orders,
with the exception of fixed price long term contracts containing minimum volume
commitments. These escalators and surcharges are linked to current raw material
prices for titanium sponge, alloys and scrap. However, because of the cyclical
nature of the titanium industry and the effect that overall demand for titanium
mill products may have on future pricing, the Company can give no assurances as
to the continuing ability to recover raw material cost increases.
RMI's strategy is to build on its leading position in the worldwide
titanium industry while maintaining a strong financial condition and stringent
quality, safety and environmental standards. RMI is emphasizing higher margin
products in its traditional markets, while continuing to develop new markets and
products such as seamless tubulars for oil and gas and geothermal energy
production.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Net Sales. Net sales in 1997 increased to $318.5 million from $251.4
million in 1996, an increase of $67.1 million or 27%. The increase in sales
results primarily from significantly higher demand and pricing for the Company's
aerospace related products such as titanium mill products and fabricated
products. Shipments of titanium mill products in 1997 amounted to 18.8 million
pounds compared to 18.5 million pounds in 1996. Average realized mill product
selling prices increased to $14.23 per pound in 1997 from $11.88 per pound in
1996, an increase of $2.35 per pound or approximately 20%. This increase results
primarily from a further
14
<PAGE> 17
increase in demand for higher valued added aerospace products, particularly flat
roll sheet and plate, as well as the imposition of metallic surcharges.
Approximately 83% of the Company's total mill product shipments were to the
aerospace industry compared to approximately 81% in 1996. Approximately 76% of
the Company's 1997 consolidated net sales were to aerospace customers compared
to approximately 73% in 1996. Sales of fabricated products and other services,
including oil and gas and geothermal energy extraction projects, amounted to
$60.6 million in 1997 compared to $37.2 million in 1996, an increase of $23.4 or
63%. This increase is attributable primarily to increased demand and pricing for
aerospace related components such as superplastically formed shapes and
cut-to-size parts. Other sales in 1997 increased to $24.8 million from $10.5
million in 1996. This increase results primarily from the inclusion of Galt
Alloys, Inc. sales beginning July 3, 1997 and an increase in government funding
under the DOE remediation and restoration contract.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for year ended December 31, 1997 amounted to
$72.8 million, or 22.9% of sales, compared to gross profit of $45.6 million, or
18.1% of sales in 1996. This increase results primarily from increased selling
prices for titanium mill products and fabricated products in the Company's
aerospace markets.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A"). SG&A expenses
amounted to $13.4 million in 1997 compared to $9.8 million in 1996. This
increase results primarily from increased levels of business activity and the
inclusion of Galt Alloys, Inc. Selling, general and administrative expenses
amounted to 4.2% of sales in 1997 compared to 3.9% in 1996.
Research, Technical and Product Development Expenses. The Company's gross
research spending amounted to $3.7 million in each of 1996 and 1997. The
Company's major research objectives are to maintain its technical expertise in
titanium production, provide customer technical support and develop new products
and markets. Certain major customers have assisted in funding the Company's
overall product development effort. Such funding, which is included as a
reduction of expense, reduced the Company's portion of research and development
expense to $3.1 million in 1997, $2.1 million in 1996.
Operating Income. Operating income in 1997 amounted to $56.3 million, or
17.7% of sales compared to $33.7 million, or 12.6% in 1996. This improvement
results primarily from increases in demand and pricing for the Company's
aerospace related products.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) in 1997 includes
approximately $1.0 million in interest income from short-term cash investments.
1996 amounts include a loss of $0.4 million on the disposal of fixed assets.
Interest Expense. Interest expense in 1997 amounted to $0.2 million
compared to $2.2 million in 1996. This improvement results primarily from
reduced levels of indebtedness during 1997 when compared to 1996.
Income Taxes. During 1997, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of
$2.8 million. This benefit is comprised of an income tax provision against
pretax income for the year of $5.9 million and an income tax benefit of $8.7
million resulting from an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance due to changes in the Company's expectations about the ultimate
realization of its deferred tax assets in years subsequent to 1997. Excluding
the $8.7 million valuation allowance adjustment, the effective tax rate for the
year ended December 31, 1997, was approximately 10.3%. The difference between
the statutory federal tax rate of 35% and the effective tax rate is principally
due to an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance which existed
at December 31, 1996 as it related to expected 1997 results. The effect of this
adjustment reduced the 1997 tax provision by approximately $14.2 million.
Net Income. Net income for the year ended December 31, 1997 amounted to
$60.1 million, or 18.9% of sales compared to $31.8 million in 1996. This
increase results primarily from improved operating margins in Company's
aerospace related markets.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Net Sales. Net sales in 1996 increased by $80.2 million to $251.4 million,
a 47% increase from net sales of $171.2 million in 1995. This increase resulted
primarily from increased titanium mill product shipments and higher average
selling prices. Mill products shipments in 1996 amounted to 18.5 million pounds
compared to
15
<PAGE> 18
14.4 million pounds in 1995, a 29% increase. Average realized mill product
selling prices increased to $11.88 per pound in 1996 compared to $10.23 per
pound during 1995, a 16% increase. The increase in both demand and pricing for
titanium mill products resulted primarily from increased aerospace demand.
Approximately 78% of the Company's 1996 mill product sales were aerospace
related compared to 75% in 1995. Sales related to the development of new
products and markets which includes long-term contracts for oil and gas and
geothermal energy production increased from $5.8 million in 1995 to $6.6 million
in 1996. Due to increased aerospace demand, sales of hot-formed parts and cut
shapes increased to $17.1 million in 1996 from $12.7 million in the same period
of 1995. As a result of increased funding under the DOE remediation and
restoration contract, other sales increased to $10.5 million in 1996 from $6.2
million in 1995.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for year ended December 31, 1996 amounted to
$45.6 million, or 18.1% of sales, compared to gross profit of $6.2 million, or
3.6% of sales in 1995. This increase results primarily from increased shipments
and selling prices for titanium mill products. Results in 1995 were adversely
impacted by a $5.0 million asset impairment charge following the adoption of
SFAS No. 121 and costs associated with stock appreciation rights amounting to
$0.8 million.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A"). Selling, general
and administrative expenses amounted to $9.8 million in 1996 compared to $9.6
million in 1995. SG&A expenses, together with research, technical and product
development expenses, discussed below, for the year 1995, include $0.6 million
of costs related to stock appreciation rights. As a percentage of sales, SG&A
expenses were 3.9% in 1996, compared to 5.6% in 1995.
Research, Technical and Product Development Expenses. The Company's total
research spending amounted to $3.7 million in 1996 and $3.4 million in 1995. The
Company's major research objectives are to maintain its technical expertise in
titanium production, provide customer technical support and develop new products
and markets. Customers assisted funding, which is included as a reduction of
research expense, reduced the Company's portion of research expense to a net of
$2.1 million in 1996 compared to $1.9 million in 1995.
Operating Income. Operating income in 1996 amounted to $33.7 million, or
13.4% of sales compared to a loss of $5.2 million in 1995. This improvement
results primarily from significant increases in mill product shipments and
average mill product selling prices. Results for the 1995 period were adversely
impacted by a $5.0 million asset impairment charge and costs associated with
stock appreciation rights.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) in 1996 includes a $0.4
million loss on disposal of fixed assets. 1995 amounts included a $1.9 million
charge for impairment of the Company's investment in a joint venture. In June
1995, the Company and Permascand AB of Sweden decided, for economic reasons, to
discontinue operations of Permipipe Titanium AS, a welded titanium pipe joint
venture in Norway.
Interest Expense. Interest expense in 1996 amounted to $2.2 million
compared to $5.0 million in 1995. This improvement resulted primarily from
reduced levels of indebtedness during 1996.
Income Taxes. In 1996, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $0.1
million. This amount is comprised of an income tax provision against pretax
income for the year of $2.5 million and an income tax benefit of $2.6 million
resulting from an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance due
to changes in the Company's expectations about the ultimate realization of its
deferred tax assets in years after 1996. Excluding the $2.6 million valuation
allowance adjustment, the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31,
1996, was approximately 7.9%. The difference between the statutory federal tax
rate of 35% and the effective tax rate is principally due to adjustments in the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance which existed at the previous year-end as
it related to expected 1996 results.
In 1995, an income tax benefit of $7.2 million was recorded to recognize a
portion of the Company's deferred tax assets believed more likely than not to be
realized under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes."
Net Income. Net income for the year ended December 31, 1996 amounted to
$31.8 million, or 12.6% of sales compared to a loss of $4.6 million in 1995.
Results for 1995 include the $5.0 million impairment charge following the
adoption of SFAS No. 121, a $1.9 million impairment of an investment in a joint
venture, and
16
<PAGE> 19
$1.5 million in costs incurred in connection with stock appreciation rights, and
a $7.2 million income tax benefit.
OUTLOOK
RMI's order backlog amounted to $383 million at December 31, 1997. The
comparative order backlog at December 31, 1996 and 1995 amounted to $328 million
and $134 million, respectively. The Company defines "order backlog" as firm
purchase orders generally subject, upon payment of specified charges, to
cancellation by the customer.
Beginning in 1995 and continuing into 1998, the Company has experienced a
significant increase in the volume of incoming orders at improving prices,
resulting in a steady increase in its order backlog. The Company's average
realized mill product selling price increased to $14.23 per pound in 1997,
compared to $11.88 per pound in 1996, a 20% increase. The Company estimates that
as of December 31, 1997, orders for approximately 95% of its anticipated 1998
shipments have been booked at average prices greater than $14 per pound. The
increase in demand has been driven primarily by the continuing recovery in the
commercial aerospace market. Because of competitive factors in the titanium
industry and the cyclical nature of the aerospace industry, there can be no
assurances that prices and demand will continue to improve. However, the long
term agreements discussed below are expected to mitigate the effects of
aerospace cyclicality, and provide RMI with a stable base load of business going
forward. The Company intends to continue its efforts to develop new markets and
products such as armor plate and seamless tubulars for oil and gas and
geothermal energy production.
The increase in worldwide demand for titanium products has put upward
pressure on prices for certain raw materials used by the Company. Prices for the
Company's 1998 titanium sponge requirements have been set under long-term supply
contracts and short-term arrangements. In the aggregate, average prices for the
Company's titanium sponge purchases in 1998 will approximate 1997 levels. Due to
the increase in demand for titanium mill products, the demand for titanium
scrap, which accounts for approximately 40% of the Company's raw material
requirements, has also increased, although prices have stabilized. Prices of
certain alloying agents have also increased as a result of increased demand. The
Company believes it has adequate sources for titanium sponge, scrap, alloying
agents and other raw materials. However, there can be no guarantee that these
materials will, at all times, be available in the required quantities, or at
advantageous prices. The Company has announced increased prices and the
implementation of metallic surcharges to recover increased raw material costs,
although there can be no assurances that the Company will continue to be able to
recover these increases. For additional information see "Business--Raw
Materials."
In November 1996, The Company was notified that the Department of Commerce
had issued a final determination that dumping did not occur on sales of titanium
sponge made by Interlink, a major trading company for Russian produced titanium
sponge. The Company purchases nearly all of its Russian titanium sponge through
Interlink. These purchases previously carried an 84% dumping duty. The
no-dumping finding eliminated this duty, thereby allowing the Company to
purchase a significant portion of its titanium sponge requirements at lower
cost.
In November 1997, one of the Company's competitors announced that it had
signed an agreement to become the principal titanium supplier to Boeing
Commercial Airplane Group. The intent, as reported, was to give Boeing and its
supply community access to titanium mill products at reduced prices and shorter
lead times in return for minimum order quantities and long-term pricing.
RMI has historically been a major supplier of aerospace quality titanium to
the Boeing supply community and 1998 orders for Boeing suppliers have already
been booked. Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group is not itself a major direct
purchaser of titanium acquiring most of its needs through semi-finished or
finished parts and components supplied by a large and diverse group of
fabricators and service centers.
On February 2, 1998, RMI entered into an agreement with Boeing Commercial
Airplane Group whereby RMI will supply Boeing and its family of commercial
suppliers with up to 4.5 million pounds of titanium products annually. The
agreement, beginning in 1999, will have an initial term of five years and,
subject to review by the parties in the fourth year, could be extended for an
additional five years. Under the accord,
17
<PAGE> 20
Boeing will receive firm prices in exchange for RMI receiving a minimum volume
commitment of 3.25 million pounds per year, or approximately 50% of its current
supply levels.
RMI has also been selected by military aircraft producers Boeing and
Northrop as the principal supplier of titanium alloy plate and alloy sheet
including just-in-time, cut-to-size products, for the C-17 Transport, F-15 Eagle
and the F/A-18 Hornet programs. The Hornet program includes the new E/F version
which utilizes considerably more titanium than earlier C/D models. The agreement
will begin with May 1999 requirements and runs through April 2001.
In addition to Boeing, RMI is a leading supplier of aerospace quality
titanium to most major domestic and international aerospace manufacturers. In
another accord, RMI, through its French affiliate, Reamet, has been chosen by
Aerospatiale as the major supplier of the titanium flat rolled products required
for its Airbus programs beginning in 1999 and extending through 2001.
Requirements are principally for flat-rolled products, including value added
cut-to-size shapes.
Assuming a continuing robust aerospace market, RMI expects to continue as a
significant participant in the aerospace markets, and together with its new
market development efforts and expected growth in nonaerospace application for
titanium believes, but cannot guarantee, it will be able to replace the reduced
Boeing supply community business. However, because of the titanium industry's
long-term supply and pricing arrangements with Boeing and others, aerospace
customers have become more resistant to significant price increases. While
higher average selling prices are anticipated for 1998, the Company does not
anticipate that the rate of pricing improvements in recent years can be
sustained indefinitely.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
In 1997, net cash flows from operating activities, totaled $38.4 million
compared to $13.7 million used in operations during 1996. The change in cash
flows from operating activities in 1997, compared to 1996, was due primarily to
significant improvements in results from operations partially offset by
increases in working capital. Working capital amounted to $184.8 million at
December 31, 1997, compared to $132.1 million at December 31, 1996. The increase
in working capital results primarily from increases in inventories and accounts
receivable partially offset by increases in accounts payable and other current
liabilities. The Company's working capital ratio was 4.87 to 1 at December 31,
1997 compared to 5.25 to 1 at December 31, 1996.
Net cash flows used in operating activities totaled $13.7 million in 1996
compared to $7.7 million in 1995. The significant improvement in operating
results in 1996 when compared to 1995 was offset by a $16.1 million contribution
to the Company's pension plans as well as significant increases in working
capital amounts, principally inventory and accounts receivable.
On May 7, 1996, the Company completed a public offering of 4,600,000 shares
of common stock at a price of $18.50 per share (the "Common Stock Offering").
Net proceeds to RMI after deducting underwriting fees and expenses amounted to
$80.3 million. The new proceeds were used to repay all outstanding indebtedness
(amounting to $65.5 million) under the then existing bank credit facilities, and
to contribute $10.2 million to certain of the company's defined benefit pension
plans (see below), and the balance was used for general corporate purposes.
In September 1996, the Company made a $16.1 million cash contribution to
certain of its defined benefit pension plans. This contribution was funded by
using $10.2 million of the net proceeds from the Common Stock Offering, and $5.9
million in borrowings under the Credit Facility.
During 1997, the Company's cash flow requirements for capital expenditures
were funded by internally generated funds. In 1996, the Company's cash flow
requirements for capital expenditures were funded primarily through proceeds
from the Common Stock Offering and borrowings.
During 1997, the Company funded working capital requirements and its
capital expenditures from funds generated by operations. In 1996, cash required
for increases in working capital and capital expenditures was provided primarily
from funds generated by operations, the Common Stock Offering, and to the extent
necessary, from borrowings under the Credit Facility. The Company anticipates
that it will be able to fund its
18
<PAGE> 21
1998 working capital requirements and its capital expenditures from funds
generated by operations. The Company may, however, undertake strategic
initiatives and make additional capital expenditures in 1998 which may require
additional financing. The Company's long-term liquidity requirements, including
capital expenditures, are expected to be financed by a combination of internally
generated funds, borrowings and other sources of external financing as needed.
Credit Facility. On April 15, 1996, the Company entered into a Credit
Facility with PNC Bank, N.A. as agent. The Credit Facility has a term of three
years and permits borrowings, on a revolving basis, of up to $50 million. There
are currently $1.2 million of outstanding standby letters of credit issued and
outstanding against the facility. The Company has the ability to borrow the
remaining $48.8 million at any time prior to maturity.
An event of default under the Credit Facility may occur, among other
things, if any person or group of persons other than USX shall have acquired
beneficial ownership of 25% or more of the voting stock of the Company, or
certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization occur. For further
information regarding the Credit Facility, see Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income," and SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information." SFAS No. 130 established standards for reporting and
display of comprehensive income and its components. The Company is required to
adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 130 beginning with its consolidated financial
statements for the three months ending March 31, 1998. SFAS No. 131 requires
certain disclosures about segment information in interim and annual financial
statements and related information about products and services, geographic areas
and major customers. The Company must adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 131 for
its consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 1998.
The results of adopting SFAS No. 130 are not expected to be significant.
The Company is currently studying the impact of applying the provisions of SFAS
No. 131. While SFAS No. 131 will not have any effect on financial position,
results of operations or cash flows, it may, depending on a number of factors,
require disclosure of certain segment information in notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
Section 382 Limitation. At December 31, 1997, the Company had net
operating loss carryforwards of approximately $43 million available to reduce
federal taxable income through at least 2006. If an "ownership change" were to
occur, the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards would be subject to
an annual limitation. Generally, an ownership change occurs with respect to a
corporation if shareholders who own, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the
capital stock of the corporation increase their aggregate percentage ownership
of such stock by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest percentage of
such stock owned by such shareholders at any time during a prescribed testing
period. An ownership change could result from equity transactions such as
exercises of stock options, purchases or sales of Common Stock by certain
stockholders, including USX, and other issuances of Common Stock by the Company.
If the annual limitation were to apply, the amount of the limitation would
generally equal the product of (i) the fair market value of the Company's equity
immediately prior to the ownership change, with certain adjustments, including a
possible adjustment to exclude certain capital contributions made in the two
years preceding the date of the ownership change, and (ii) a long-term tax
exempt bond rate of return published monthly by the Internal Revenue Service.
Should the annual limitation apply, the Company believes that it would not
materially affect the potential use of the net operating loss carryforwards to
reduce any future income tax liabilities over time; however, it is possible that
the Company's results in a particular year could exceed the annual limitation,
in which case such excess would not be reduced by the net operating loss
carryforward and the Company's tax liability would be correspondingly higher.
In November, 1996, USX Corporation completed a public offering of its notes
exchangeable February, 2000, for 5,483,600 shares of RMI Common Stock owned by
USX ("DECS"). Such shares represent all of the RMI Common Stock owned by USX and
27% of the outstanding shares of RMI. While not free from doubt, the Company
believes the sale of the DECS itself should not result in an ownership change.
USX has
19
<PAGE> 22
agreed to indemnify the company against any additional federal, state and local
taxes incurred if there is a determination that an ownership change has occurred
as a result of the sale by USX of the DECS (but not the exchange, at maturity,
of the Common Stock for the DECS, if USX delivers Common Stock), other than in
the event there is a determination that an ownership change had occurred prior
to the date of issuance of the DECS. If one or more events occur subsequent to
the issuance of the DECS which would have constituted an ownership change if the
sale of the DECS had not occurred, USX's indemnification obligation is limited
to the difference between the additional taxes payable as a result of an
ownership change resulting from the sale of the DECS and the additional taxes
payable assuming such ownership change had occurred as a result of one or more
such events. The Company is unable to determine whether an ownership change will
occur if Common Stock is exchanged for the DECS since such determination will be
dependent on the facts at the time of exchange.
SFAS No. 109 Effects. In 1997 and 1996, the Company recorded income tax
benefits of $2.8 and $0.1 million, respectively. The 1997 amount is comprised of
an income tax provision of $5.9 million against pretax income for the year and
an income tax benefit of $8.7 million resulting from an adjustment to the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to changes in the Company's
expectations about the ultimate realization of its deferred tax assets in years
after 1997. The 1996 tax benefit is comprised of a $2.5 million tax provision
against pretax income and a $2.6 million tax benefit resulting from adjustments
to the deferred tax valuation allowance.
SFAS 109 requires a valuation allowance when it is "more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized." It
further states that "forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not
needed is difficult when there is negative evidence such as cumulative losses in
recent years." The ultimate realization of this deferred income tax asset
depends on the Company's ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the
future. In the third quarter of 1997, the Company evaluated all available
evidence supporting the realization of future taxable income and, based upon
that evaluation, concluded it was more likely than not at that a portion of its
deferred tax assets would be realized, resulting in the $8.7 million tax credit.
A similar evaluation process was performed in the third quarter of 1996,
resulting in a $2.6 million tax credit. The remaining valuation allowance has
been retained, in light of the requirement in SFAS 109 to give weight to object
evidence such as recent losses and the historical titanium industry business
cycle.
At December 31, 1997, approximately $16 million of the remaining net
operating loss carryforwards have not yet been recognized for SFAS 109 purposes.
If the Company were to achieve operating results in 1998 similar to those
achieved in 1997, the remaining valuation allowance relating to net operating
loss carryforwards would be recognized in the effective rate calculation for the
year, resulting in an effective book tax rate below the statutory federal rate
of 35%, but higher than the 1997 effective rate of 10.3%. Should this occur, the
entire amount of the Company's net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized
for SFAS 109 purposes.
For federal income tax return purpose, the amount of remaining net
operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 1997 amounts to approximately $43
million, which are available to offset future taxable income. If the Company
were to generate sufficient taxable income, the currently available net
operating loss carryforwards could be fully utilized in 1998. Because of the
availability of these net operating loss carryforwards to offset taxable income,
the Company estimates that actual cash payments for federal income taxes in 1998
will be well below the level which could be expected by applying the statutory
federal tax rate of 35% to pretax income. Because of net operating loss
carryforwards, the amount of federal income taxes paid in 1997 represented
primarily alternative minimum taxes.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations as well as
various health and safety laws and regulations that are subject to frequent
modifications and revisions. While the costs of compliance for these matters
have not had a material adverse impact on RMI in the past, it is impossible to
predict accurately the ultimate effect these changing laws and regulations may
have on the Company in the future.
At December 31, 1997, the amount accrued for future environment-related
costs was $2.8 million. Based on available information, RMI believes its share
of potential environmental-related costs, before expected
20
<PAGE> 23
contributions from third parties, is in a range from $3.9 million to $6.7
million, in the aggregate. The amount accrued is net of expected contributions
from third parties (which does not include any amounts from insurers) of
approximately $2.1 million, which the Company believes are probable. The Company
has been receiving contributions from such third parties for a number of years
as partial reimbursement for costs incurred by the Company. As these proceedings
continue toward final resolution, amounts in excess of those already provided
may be necessary to discharge the Company from its obligations for these
projects.
The Company broadly estimates it could spend approximately $3-$4 million in
the 1998-2000 time frame on environmental matters including capital items,
compliance costs and the items referred to above. This amount could increase or
decrease depending on a number of factors, including changing environmental laws
and regulations, and the nature, extent or timing of actual clean-up and
remediation projects.
The ultimate resolution of these environmental matters could individually,
or in the aggregate, be material to the consolidated financial statements.
However, management believes that the Company will remain a viable and
competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these matters could be
resolved unfavorably.
For a further discussion of environmental matters see "Business--Legal
Proceedings--Environmental."
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
The Company has and will continue to make certain investments in its
application software to ensure the Company is Year 2000 compliant. In addition,
the Company is monitoring the compliance efforts of entities with which it
interacts. While it is not possible, at present, to accurately estimate the
incremental cost of this effort, the Company does not anticipate it will have a
material impact on the long-term results of operations, liquidity or
consolidated financial position of the Company. This discussion of RMI's efforts
and managements expectations relating to the effect of Year 2000 compliance on
operating results are forward looking statements. RMI's ability to achieve Year
2000 compliance and the level of incremental costs associated therewith could be
adversely impacted by, among other things, the availability and cost of
programming and testing resources, vendors' ability to modify proprietary
software and unanticipated problems identified in the ongoing compliance review.
In addition, RMI has limited or no control over the actions of proprietary
software vendors and other entities with which it interacts. Therefore, Year
2000 compliance problems experienced by these entities could adversely affect
the results of the Company. At December 31, 1997, the Company estimates that
approximately 85% of its internally developed proprietary software has been
modified to make it Year 2000 compliant.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Gross capital expenditures in 1997 amounted to $7.9 million compared to
$4.2 million in 1996. The Company currently estimates that its 1998 capital
expenditures will be in a range of $35.0 to $40.0 million including amounts for
the Galt expansion. Other planned capital projects are intended primarily to
renovate and improve existing facilities for the purposes of increasing
efficiency, improving product quality and increasing material throughput. The
Company may, however, undertake other strategic initiatives and make additional
capital expenditures in 1998. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" above.
21
<PAGE> 24
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Report of Management........................................ 23
Report of Independent Accountants........................... 23
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995....................... 24
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and
1996................................................... 25
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995....................... 26
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for the
years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995....................... 27
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ 28
</TABLE>
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
22
<PAGE> 25
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
RMI Titanium Company has prepared and is responsible for the consolidated
financial statements and other financial information included in this Annual
Report. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some
amounts based on the best judgments and estimates of management. Financial
information displayed in other sections of this Annual Report is consistent with
that in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company maintains a comprehensive formalized system of internal
accounting controls. Management believes that the internal accounting controls
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are executed and recorded in
accordance with Company policy and procedures and that the accounting records
may be relied on as a basis for preparation of the consolidated financial
statements and other financial information. In addition, as part of their audit
of the consolidated financial statements, the Company's independent accountants,
who are elected by the shareholders, review and test the internal accounting
controls selectively to establish a basis of reliance thereon in determining the
nature, extent and timing of audit tests to be applied.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of
directors who are not employees of the Company, meets regularly with the
independent accountants, management and internal auditors to discuss the
adequacy of internal accounting controls and the quality of financial reporting.
Both the independent accountants and internal auditors have full and free access
to the Audit Committee.
/s/ JOHN H. ODLE
- -------------------------
John H. Odle
Executive Vice President
/s/ T. G. RUPERT
- -------------------------
T. G. Rupert
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the
accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of RMI Titanium Company and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our
audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, in 1995 the Company
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of."
/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
- -------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
January 23, 1998
23
<PAGE> 26
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
-------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
---------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales.................................................. $ 318,530 $ 251,357 $ 171,166
Operating costs:
Cost of sales.......................................... 245,687 205,748 164,949
Selling, general and administrative expenses........... 13,397 9,785 9,576
Research, technical and product development expenses... 3,131 2,094 1,861
---------- ---------- ---------
Total operating cost............................ 262,215 217,627 176,386
---------- ---------- ---------
Operating income (loss)................................ 56,315 33,730 (5,220)
Other income (expense)--net............................ 1,246 110 (1,622)
Interest expense....................................... (244) (2,181) (4,966)
---------- ---------- ---------
Income (loss) before income taxes...................... 57,317 31,659 (11,808)
Provision (credit) for income taxes (Note 8)........... (2,768) (100) (7,200)
---------- ---------- ---------
Net income (loss)...................................... $ 60,085 $ 31,759 $ (4,608)
========== ========== =========
Net income (loss) per common share (Note 4)
Basic................................................ $ 2.94 $ 1.71 $ (0.30)
========== ========== =========
Diluted.............................................. $ 2.92 $ 1.70 $ (0.30)
========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
24
<PAGE> 27
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 30,211 $ 5,944
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,064
and $979.................................................. 70,898 57,702
Inventories................................................. 120,732 92,616
Deferred tax asset.......................................... 4,811 2,733
Other current assets........................................ 5,903 4,205
--------- ---------
Total current assets................................. 232,555 163,200
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation.............................................. 43,034 37,855
Noncurrent deferred tax asset............................... 5,157 4,467
Other noncurrent assets..................................... 10,563 10,358
--------- ---------
Total assets......................................... $ 291,309 $ 215,880
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current portion of long-term debt........................... $ -- $ 120
Accounts payable............................................ 25,346 15,288
Accrued wages and other employee costs...................... 8,024 6,299
Other accrued liabilities................................... 14,361 9,357
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities............................ 47,731 31,064
Long-term debt.............................................. -- 3,600
Accrued postretirement benefit cost......................... 19,376 19,442
Noncurrent pension liabilities.............................. -- 1,028
Other noncurrent liabilities................................ 3,029 2,010
--------- ---------
Total liabilities.................................... 70,136 57,144
--------- ---------
Contingencies (see Note 14).................................
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred Stock, no par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares outstanding..................................... -- --
Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
21,022,253 and 20,858,748 shares issued (Note 3).......... 210 208
Additional paid-in capital (Note 3)......................... 236,970 234,958
Accumulated deficit......................................... (11,682) (71,767)
Deferred compensation....................................... (1,100) (557)
Excess minimum pension liability............................ -- (1,028)
Treasury Common Stock at 575,485 and 568,198 shares......... (3,225) (3,078)
--------- ---------
Total shareholders' equity........................... 221,173 158,736
--------- ---------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity........... $ 291,309 $ 215,880
========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
25
<PAGE> 28
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
--------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH PROVIDED FROM (USED IN) OPERATIONS:
Net income (loss).......................................... $ 60,085 $ 31,759 $ (4,608)
Adjustment for items not affecting funds from operations:
Change in accounting principle........................ -- -- 5,031
Compensation expense for stock appreciation rights.... -- -- 1,465
Depreciation.......................................... 5,047 5,049 6,443
Deferred income taxes................................. (2,768) -- (7,200)
Impairment of joint venture investment................ -- -- 1,901
Other-noncash charges--net............................ 617 963 2,137
-------- -------- --------
62,981 37,771 5,169
-------- -------- --------
CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (NET OF EFFECTS OF
BUSINESS ACQUIRED):
Receivables................................................ (10,463) (16,731) (13,159)
Inventories................................................ (25,886) (18,563) (1,587)
Accounts payable........................................... 7,368 (2,358) (186)
Other current liabilities.................................. 5,259 1,125 2,469
Other assets and liabilities............................... (383) (11,520) (732)
Noncurrent pension liabilities............................. (1,028) (4,010) --
Other...................................................... 535 647 301
-------- -------- --------
(24,598) (51,410) (12,894)
-------- -------- --------
Cash provided from (used in) operating activities... 38,383 (13,639) (7,725)
-------- -------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of Galt Alloys, Inc. net of cash acquired.... (2,605) -- --
Proceeds from sale of facilities......................... -- 1,134 130
Capital expenditures..................................... (7,894) (4,194) (1,552)
-------- -------- --------
Cash used in investing activities................... (10,499) (3,060) (1,422)
-------- -------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Exercise of Employee Stock Options....................... 1,095 2,161 --
Net proceeds from issuance of Common Stock............... -- 80,393 --
Net borrowings under revolving credit agreements......... -- 2,900 9,400
Debt repayments.......................................... (4,565) (63,320) (120)
Treasury Common Stock repurchased........................ (147) -- (9)
-------- -------- --------
Cash (used in) provided from financing activities... (3,617) 22,134 9,271
-------- -------- --------
Increase in cash and cash equivalents...................... 24,267 5,435 124
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period........... 5,944 509 385
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period................. $ 30,211 $ 5,944 $ 509
======== ======== ========
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for:
Interest net of amounts capitalized................. $ 72 $ 2,579 $ 4,320
Income taxes........................................ $ 1,105 $ -- $ --
Non-cash financing activities:
Issuance of Common Stock for Restricted Stock awards..... $ 832 $ 682 $ 71
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
26
<PAGE> 29
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXCESS
ADDT'L. RETAINED TREASURY MINIMUM
SHARES COMMON DEFERRED PAID-IN EARNINGS COMMON PENSION
OUTSTANDING STOCK COMPENSATION CAPITAL (DEFICIT) STOCK LIABILITY
----------- ----- ------------ ------- --------- ----- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at
December 31, 1994....... 15,271,561 $ 158 $ -- $151,058 $ (98,918) $(3,069) $(6,633)
Shares issued for Directors'
compensation.............. 4,952 -- -- 38 -- -- --
Treasury Common Stock
purchased at cost......... (1,098) -- -- -- -- (9) --
Shares issued for Restricted
Stock Award Plans......... 10,000 -- -- 71 -- -- --
Shares issued from exercise
of employee stock
options................... 54,478 1 -- 548 -- -- --
Net loss.................... -- -- -- -- (4,608) -- --
Excess minimum pension
liability................. -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,748)
----------- ----- ------- -------- --------- ------- -------
Balance at
December 31, 1995........ 15,339,893 $ 159 $ -- $151,715 $(103,526) $(3,078) $(8,381)
Shares issued for Directors'
Compensation.............. 2,585 -- -- 56 -- -- --
Shares issued for Restricted
Stock Award Plans......... 51,000 -- (682) 682 -- -- --
Compensation expense
recognized................ -- -- 125 -- -- -- --
Shares issued as a result of
Common Stock Offering
(Note 3).................. 4,600,000 46 -- 80,347 -- -- --
Shares issued from exercise
of employee stock
options................... 297,072 3 -- 2,158 -- -- --
Net income.................. -- -- -- -- 31,759 -- --
Excess minimum pension
liability................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,353
----------- ----- ------- -------- --------- ------- -------
Balance at
December 31, 1996........ 20,290,550 $ 208 $ (557) $234,958 $ (71,767) $(3,078) $(1,028)
=========== ===== ======= ======== ========= ======= =======
Shares issued for Directors'
Compensation.............. 3,346 -- -- 87 -- -- --
Shares issued for Restricted
Stock Award Plans......... 34,950 -- (832) 832 -- -- --
Compensation expense
recognized................ -- -- 289 -- -- -- --
Treasury Common Stock
purchased at cost......... (7,287) -- -- -- -- (147) --
Shares issued from exercise
of employee stock
options................... 125,209 2 -- 1,093 -- -- --
Net income.................. -- -- -- -- 60,085 -- --
Excess minimum pension
liability................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,028
----------- ----- ------- -------- --------- ------- -------
Balance at
December 31, 1997......... 20,446,768 $ 210 $(1,100) $236,970 $ (11,682) $(3,225) $ --
=========== ===== ======= ======== ========= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
27
<PAGE> 30
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
NOTE 1--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS:
The consolidated financial statements of RMI Titanium Company (the
"Company") include the financial position and results of operations for the
Company and its subsidiaries.
The Company is a successor to entities that have been operating in the
titanium industry since 1958. In 1990, USX Corporation ("USX") and Quantum
Chemical Corporation ("Quantum") transferred their entire ownership interest in
the Company's immediate predecessor, RMI Company, an Ohio general partnership,
to the Company in exchange for shares of the Company's Common Stock (the
"Reorganization"). Quantum then sold its shares to the public. USX retained
ownership of its shares. At December 31, 1997 approximately 27% of the
outstanding common stock was owned by USX. For additional information on the
Company's capital structure see Note 4.
In November, 1996, USX Corporation completed a public offering of its notes
exchangeable February, 2000, for 5,483,600 shares of RMI Common Stock owned by
USX (or for an equivalent amount of cash at USX's option). Such shares represent
all of the RMI Common Stock owned by USX, and 27% of the outstanding shares of
RMI.
On July 3, 1997, the Company acquired 90% of the common stock of Galt
Alloys, Inc., a manufacturer of ferro titanium and a producer and worldwide
distributor of specialty alloys to ferrous and nonferrous customers. RMI's
investment in Galt amounts to an initial cash investment of $3 million and an
agreement to invest up to an additional $17 million to finance a major expansion
program at Galt, which is expected to be completed in the next 18 to 24 months.
The Company's operations are conducted primarily in one business segment,
the production and marketing of titanium metal and related products. In the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, export sales were $61.6 million,
$41.5 million, and $30.1 million, respectively, principally to customers in
Western Europe. The majority of the Company's export sales are made in U.S.
dollars, which minimizes exposure to foreign currency risk.
NOTE 2--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Principles of consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of RMI Titanium
Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions are eliminated.
Use of Estimates:
Generally accepted accounting principles require management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at year-end and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year.
Inventories:
Inventories are primarily valued at cost as determined by the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method which, in the aggregate, is lower than market. Inventory
costs generally include materials, labor costs and manufacturing overhead
(including depreciation).
28
<PAGE> 31
Depreciation and amortization:
In general, depreciation and amortization of properties is determined using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes
of assets. For financial accounting purposes, depreciation and amortization are
provided over the following useful lives:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Building and improvements.................................. 20-25 years
Machinery and equipment.................................... 10-14 years
Furniture and fixtures..................................... 3-10 years
</TABLE>
Retirement and disposal of properties:
The cost of properties retired or otherwise disposed of, together with the
accumulated depreciation provided thereon, is eliminated from the accounts. The
net gain or loss is recognized in other income and expense.
Maintenance and repairs:
Routine maintenance, repairs and replacements are charged to operations.
Expenditures that materially increase values, change capacities or extend useful
lives are capitalized.
Long-lived assets:
Effective June 30, 1995, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 121 ("SFAS No. 121"), "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." The standard
requires that certain long-lived and intangible assets be written down to fair
value whenever an impairment review indicates that the carrying value of the
asset cannot be recovered.
Revenue and cost recognition:
Revenues from the sale of commercial products are recognized upon passage
of title to the customer, which in most cases coincides with shipment. Revenues
from long-term, fixed-price contracts are recognized on the
percentage-of-completion method, measured based on the achievement of certain
milestones in the production and fabrication process. Such milestones have been
weighted based on the critical nature of the operation performed, which
management believes is the best available measure of progress on these
contracts. Revenues related to cost-plus-fee contracts are recognized on the
basis of costs incurred during the period plus the fee earned.
Contract costs comprise all direct material and labor costs, including
outside processing fees, and those indirect costs related to contract
performance. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made
in the period in which such losses are determined.
Contract costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts, net of
progress billings, are included in the consolidated balance sheet under
"Inventories."
Pensions:
The Company and its subsidiaries have a number of noncontributory pension
plans which cover substantially all employees. Most employees are covered by
defined benefit plans in which benefits are based on years of service and annual
compensation. Contributions to the defined benefit plans, as determined by an
independent actuary in accordance with regulations, provide not only for
benefits attributed to date but also for those expected to be earned in the
future.
The Company's policy is to fund pension costs at amounts equal to the
minimum funding requirements of ERISA plus additional amounts as may be approved
from time to time.
29
<PAGE> 32
Postretirement benefits:
The Company provides certain health care benefits and life insurance
coverage for certain of its employees and their dependents. Under the Company's
current plans, certain of the Company's employees will become eligible for those
benefits if they reach retirement age while working with the Company.
The Company does not prefund postretirement benefit costs, but rather pays
claims as presented.
Income tax:
In connection with the Reorganization, the tax basis of the Company's
assets at that time reflected the fair market value of the common stock then
issued by the Company. The new tax basis was allocated to all assets of the
Company based on federal income tax rules and regulations, and the results of an
independent appraisal. For financial statement purposes, the Company's assets
are carried at historical cost. As a result, the tax basis of a significant
portion of the Company's assets exceeds the related book values and depreciation
and amortization for tax purposes exceeds the corresponding financial statement
amounts. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates which will be in effect when
these differences reverse.
Stock-based compensation:
Effective January 1, 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." The statement established standards for accounting for
stock-based compensation but also allows companies to continue to account for
stock-based compensation under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and make certain
additional disclosures in the notes to financial statements. The Company
continues to account for stock-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion
No. 25.
Cash flows:
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all
highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less
to be cash equivalents.
NOTE 3--COMMON STOCK OFFERING:
On May 7, 1996, the Company completed a Common Stock Offering of 4,600,000
shares at a price of $18.50 per share. Net proceeds of RMI after deducting
underwriting fees and expenses amounted to $80.3 million. The proceeds were used
to repay all outstanding indebtedness under the existing bank credit facilities
amounting to $65.5 million, $10.2 million was contributed to the Company's
pension plans and the balance used for general corporate purposes. Concurrent
with the Company's Stock Offering, USX Corporation sold 2,300,000 shares of its
investment in RMI Common Stock at the same price. RMI did not receive any of the
proceeds from the sale of RMI Common Stock by USX. As a result of these
transactions, USX's percentage of ownership in RMI was reduced from
approximately 51% to approximately 27%.
NOTE 4--EARNINGS PER SHARE:
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, "Earnings per
Share," which establishes new requirements for computing and presenting earnings
per share. The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 128 for the year
ended December 31, 1997, and has restated per share amounts for all prior annual
and quarterly periods presented as required by the new standard.
30
<PAGE> 33
A reconciliation of the income and common stock share amounts used in the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December
31, 1997 and 1996 follows. Diluted earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 1995 is antidilutive and therefor, not presented (net income in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET PER SHARE
INCOME SHARES AMOUNT
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1997
Basic EPS................................................ $60,085 20,401,601 $2.94
Effect of dilutive securities:
Exercise of stock options.............................. -- 165,254 .02
------- ---------- -----
Diluted EPS.............................................. $60,085 20,566,855 $2.92
======= ========== =====
For the year ended December 31, 1996
Basic EPS................................................ $31,759 18,516,645 $1.71
Effect of dilutive securities:
Exercise of stock options.............................. -- 166,959 .01
------- ---------- -----
Diluted EPS.............................................. $31,759 18,683,604 $1.70
======= ========== =====
</TABLE>
NOTE 5--INVENTORIES:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
----------------------
1997 1996
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials and supplies.................................. $ 55,542 $ 33,126
Work-in-process and finished goods.......................... 95,462 88,326
Adjustment to LIFO values................................... (30,272) (28,836)
--------- ---------
$ 120,732 $ 92,616
========= =========
</TABLE>
NOTE 6--ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
----------------------
1997 1996
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Trade and commercial customers.............................. $ 66,090 $ 55,386
Progress billings on uncompleted contracts.................. 3,437 2,380
U. S.Government-DOE......................................... 2,435 915
--------- ---------
71,962 58,681
Less allowance for doubtful accounts........................ (1,064) (979)
--------- ---------
$ 70,898 $ 57,702
========= =========
</TABLE>
NOTE 7--PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost and consists of the
following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
----------------------
1997 1996
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Land........................................................ $ 770 $ 659
Buildings and improvements.................................. 36,637 36,429
Machinery and equipment..................................... 89,702 83,517
Other....................................................... 18,246 13,905
Construction in progress.................................... 2,838 1,894
--------- ---------
148,193 136,404
Less--Accumulated depreciation.............................. (105,159) (98,549)
--------- ---------
$ 43,034 $ 37,855
========= =========
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE> 34
NOTE 8--INCOME TAXES:
Deferred taxes result from the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
--------------------
1997 1996(1)
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Loss carryforwards ($43,000 and 95,000 at December 31,
1997 and 1996 respectively, expiring in 2006 through
2010).................................................. $ 15,551 $ 33,685
Inventories............................................... 6,004 5,945
Property, plant and equipment............................. 2,308 3,620
Intangible assets......................................... 1,478 1,496
Other postretirement benefit costs........................ 6,846 6,702
Other employment costs.................................... 1,636 1,443
Tax credits............................................... 1,714 315
Environmental related costs............................... 1,222 607
Other..................................................... 1,019 975
Valuation allowance....................................... (22,752) (43,212)
-------- --------
Total deferred tax assets.............................. 15,026 11,576
-------- --------
Deferred tax liabilities....................................
Pension costs.......................................... (5,058) (4,376)
-------- --------
Net deferred taxes.......................................... $ 9,968 $ 7,200
======== ========
</TABLE>
- ---------
(1) Certain 1996 amounts have been reclassified for presentation purposes.
In 1997 and 1996, the Company recorded income tax benefits of $2.8 and $0.1
million, respectively. The 1997 amount is comprised of an income tax provision
of $5.9 million against pretax income for the year and an income tax benefit of
$8.7 million resulting from an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance due to changes in the Company's expectations about the ultimate
realization of its deferred tax assets in years after 1997. Excluding the $8.7
million valuation allowance adjustment, the effective tax rate for the year
ended December 31, 1997 was approximately 10.3%. The 1996 tax benefit is
comprised of a $2.5 million tax provision against pretax income and a $2.6
million tax benefit resulting from adjustments to the deferred tax valuation
allowance. The difference between the statutory federal tax rate of 35% and the
effective tax rate in both 1997 and 1996 results principally from adjustments to
the deferred tax asset valuation allowance as it relates to actual results for
each year, when compared to the expectations inherent in the valuation allowance
at the beginning of the year.
SFAS 109 requires a valuation allowance when it is "more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized." It
further states that "forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not
needed is difficult when there is negative evidence such as cumulative losses in
recent years." The ultimate realization of this deferred income tax asset
depends on the Company's ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the
future. The Company has evaluated the available evidence supporting the
realization of future taxable income and, based upon that evaluation, believes
it is more likely than not at this time that a portion of its deferred tax
assets will be realized. The remaining valuation allowance has been retained, in
light of the requirement in SFAS 109 to give weight to objective evidence such
as recent losses and the historical titanium industry business cycle.
At December 31, 1997, approximately $16 million of the remaining net
operating loss carryforwards have not yet been recognized for SFAS 109 purposes.
For federal income tax return purposes, the amount of remaining net operating
loss carryforwards at December 31, 1997 amounts to approximately $43 million,
which are available to offset future taxable income.
If an "ownership change" were to occur within the meaning of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 as amended, the utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards would be subject to an annual limitation. Should the annual
limitation apply, the Company believes that it would affect the timing of the
use of, but not the ultimate ability of the Company to use, the net operating
loss carryforwards to reduce future income tax
32
<PAGE> 35
liabilities. Application of the limitation (if any) is not expected to affect
the income tax provision (benefit) reported for financial accounting purposes.
NOTE 9--LONG-TERM DEBT:
In connection with the Common Stock Offering referred to in Note 4 above,
the Company entered into a credit agreement, dated April 15, 1996 (the "Credit
Facility"), to replace the Company's prior credit facilities. The Credit
Facility has a term of three years and permits borrowings, on a revolving basis,
of up to the lesser of $50 million or a borrowing base equal to the sum of 85%
of qualified accounts receivable and 50% of qualified inventory. At December 31,
1997, no amounts were outstanding under the facility. $1.2 million of letters of
credit were issued against the Credit Facility.
Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company, at its option, is able
to borrow at (a) a base rate (which is the higher of PNC Bank's prime rate or
the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 1/2% per annum), or (b) LIBOR or the
Federal Funds Effective Rate, plus a spread (ranging from 1/2% to 1%)
determined by the ratio of the Company's consolidated earnings before interest
and taxes to consolidated interest expense.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility were initially secured by the
Company's accounts receivable, inventory, other personal property and cash and
cash equivalents. Borrowings became unsecured at June 30, 1997.
An event of default under the Credit Facility shall occur if, among other
things, any person or group of persons other than USX shall have acquired
beneficial ownership of 25% or more of the voting stock of the Company. The
Credit Facility contains additional terms and financial covenants which are
typical for other similar facilities.
As of December 31, 1997, the Company was in compliance with the covenants
and terms of the Credit Facility. The available and unused portion of the
facility (after deducting outstanding letters of credit) amounted to $48.8
million at December 31, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
--------------------
1997 1996
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Revolving Credit Facility dated April 15, 1996, maturing
April 14, 1999, bearing interest at 6.76% at December 31,
1996...................................................... $ -- $ 2,900
Industrial revenue bond bearing interest at floating rates
based on weekly tax exempt market rates (3.75% at December
31, 1996) in annual sinking fund payments of $120 over 15
years from October, 1988.................................. -- 820
Current portion of long-term debt........................... $ -- (120)
-------- --------
$ -- $ 3,600
======== ========
</TABLE>
NOTE 10--PENSION PLANS:
Pension expense was determined assuming an expected rate of return on plan
assets of 9% for 1997, 1996 and 1995. The components of pension expense for the
three years ended December 31, 1997 is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
----------------- ---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Service Cost........................ $ 1,252 $ 1,358 $ 1,063
Interest cost....................... 5,166 5,055 5,064
Return on plan assets:
Actual............................ (14,066) (7,537) (10,598)
Deferred gain..................... 7,907 (6,159) 2,410 (5,127) 6,095 (4,503)
------- ------ -------
Net amortization and deferral....... 821 1,043 606
------- ------- -------
Pension expense..................... $ 1,080 $ 2,329 $ 2,230
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE> 36
Funds' status--The benefit obligations at December 31, 1997 and 1996 were
determined using discount rates of 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively, and an assumed
rate of compensation increase of 5.75% for both years.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
----------------------------------------------------
1997 1996
------------------------ ------------------------
OVERFUNDED UNDERFUNDED OVERFUNDED UNDERFUNDED
PLANS PLANS PLANS PLANS
---------- -------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fair value of plan assets............. $ 84,073 $ 624 $ 62,369 $ 11,232
Projected benefit obligation (PBO).... (75,855) (774) (59,626) (12,207)
---------- -------- ---------- --------
Plan assets greater (less) than PBO... 8,218 (150) 2,743 (975)
Unrecognized net loss................. 1,988 110 4,444 1,233
Unrecognized transition obligation.... 884 (14) 1,415 (239)
Unrecognized prior service cost....... 2,928 84 3,366 92
Adjustment required to recognize
minimum liability................... -- (61) -- (1,028)
---------- -------- ---------- --------
Prepaid (accrued) pension expense..... $ 14,018 $ (31) $ 11,968 $ (917)
========== ======== ========== ========
Accumulated benefit obligation........ $ (71,936) $ (655) $ (56,354) $(12,150)
========== ======== ========== ========
Vested benefit obligation............. $ (67,954) $ (506) $ (52,531) $(12,031)
========== ======== ========== ========
</TABLE>
As of December 31, 1997, approximately 50% of the plans' assets are
invested in equity securities, 22% in government debt instruments, and the
balance in cash equivalents or debt securities.
Pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 87 "Employers Accounting for Pensions," the Company recorded in other
noncurrent liabilities an additional minimum pension obligation of $0.01 and
$1.0 as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, representing the amount by
which the accumulated benefit obligation for certain of the Company's plans
exceeded the fair value of plan assets plus accrued amounts previously recorded.
NOTE 11--POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH CARE BENEFITS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost............................................. $ 260 $ 303 $ 266
Interest cost............................................ 1,405 1,492 1,543
Net amortization and deferrals........................... 130 163 119
------ ------ ------
$1,795 $1,958 $1,928
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth the plans' status reconciled with the amount
reported in the Company's balance sheet at December 31, 1997 and 1996 (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation
("APBO") Attributable to:
Retirees............................................... $(10,565) $(11,523)
Active participants......................................... (8,662) (7,744)
-------- --------
Total APBO............................................. $(19,227) $(19,267)
======== ========
Accrued liability included in balance sheet, including
transition obligation..................................... $(19,021) $(18,618)
Unrecognized net loss....................................... (206) (649)
-------- --------
Total APBO............................................. $(19,227) $(19,267)
======== ========
</TABLE>
The ultimate costs of certain of the Company's retiree health care plans
are capped at predetermined out-of-pocket spending limits. The annual rate of
increase in the per capita costs for these plans is limited to the predetermined
spending cap. As of December 31, 1997, the predetermined limits had been reached
and, as a
34
<PAGE> 37
result, increases in claim cost rates will have no impact on the reported
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or net periodic expense. The
discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation at December 31, 1997 and 1996 was 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively.
NOTE 12--OPERATING LEASES:
The Company and its subsidiaries have entered into various operating leases
for the use of certain equipment, principally office equipment and vehicles. The
leases generally contain renewal options and provide that the lessee pay
insurance and maintenance costs. The total rental expense under operating leases
amounted to $1.9 million in 1997 and $1.3 million in each of 1996, and 1995.
Future commitments under operating leases are considered to be immaterial.
NOTE 13--TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES:
The Company, in the ordinary course of business, purchases goods and
services, including conversion services, from USX and related companies. The
cost of such transactions to the Company amounted to $1.2 million in 1997, $0.6
million in 1996, and $1.3 million in 1995. The cost of these transactions were
on terms no less favorable to the Company than those obtained from other
parties. The United States Steel and Carnegie Pension Fund (the "Pension Fund")
is the trustee of the Company's pension plans. The Pension Fund is a registered
investment advisor under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, and receives a
negotiated fee for such services. Other transactions with related parties are
incidental to the Company's business and are not significant.
NOTE 14--CONTINGENCIES:
In connection with the Reorganization, the Company has agreed to indemnify
USX and Quantum against liabilities related to their ownership of the Company
and its immediate predecessor, Reactive Metals, Inc., which was formed by USX
and Quantum in 1964.
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims
arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. Given the
critical nature of many of the aerospace end uses for the Company's products,
including specifically their use in critical rotating parts of gas turbine
engines, the Company maintains aircraft products liability insurance of $250
million, which includes grounding liability.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to pervasive
environmental laws and regulations concerning the production, handling, storage,
transportation, emission, and disposal of waste materials and is also subject to
other federal and state laws and regulations regarding health and safety
matters. These laws and regulations are constantly evolving, and it is not
currently possible to predict accurately the ultimate effect these laws and
regulations will have on the Company in the future.
The Company is involved in investigative or cleanup projects under federal
or state environmental laws at a number of waste disposal sites, including the
Fields Brook Superfund Site. Given the status of the proceedings with respect to
these sites, ultimate investigative and remediation costs cannot presently be
accurately predicted, but could, in the aggregate be material. Based on the
information available regarding the current ranges of estimated remediation
costs at currently active sites, and what the Company believes will be its
ultimate share of such costs, provisions for environmental-related costs have
been recorded. These provisions are in addition to amounts which have previously
been accrued for the Company's share of environmental study costs.
With regard to the Fields Brook Superfund Site, the Company, together with
31 other companies, has been identified by the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency ("EPA") as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") with respect to a
superfund site defined as the Fields Brook Watershed in Ashtabula, Ohio, which
includes the Company's now closed Ashtabula facilities. The EPA's 1986 estimate
of the cost of remediation of the Fields Brook operable sediment unit was $48
million. However, recent studies show the volume of sediment to be substantially
lower than projected in 1986. These studies, together with improved remediation
35
<PAGE> 38
technology and redefined cleanup standards have resulted in a more recent
estimate of the remediation cost of approximately $25 million. The actual cost
of remediation may vary from the estimate depending upon any number of factors.
The EPA, in March 1989, ordered 22 of the PRPs to conduct a design phase
study for the sediment operable unit and a source control study, which studies
are nearly complete. The Company, working cooperatively with fourteen others, is
complying with the order and has accrued and has been paying its portion of the
cost of complying with the cost of such compliance. It is currently anticipated
that the studies will be completed no earlier than mid 1998. Actual cleanup is
not scheduled to commence prior to 1999. The Company's share of the study costs
have been established at 9.95%. In June 1995, the Company and twelve others
entered into a Phase 2 (actual cleanup) allocation agreement which assigns 9.44%
of the cost to RMI. However, the actual percentage may be more or less based on
contributions from other parties which are not currently participating in the
Phase 2 allocation agreement.
At December 31, 1997, the amount accrued for future environmental-related
costs was $2.8 million. Based on available information, RMI believes its share
of potential environmental-related costs, before expected contributions from
third parties, is in a range from $3.9 million to $6.7 million, in the
aggregate. The amount accrued is net of expected contributions from third
parties (other than insurers) of approximately $2.1 million, which the Company
believes are probable. The Company has been receiving contributions from such
third parties for a number of years as partial reimbursement for costs incurred
by the Company. As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to discharge the Company
from its obligations for these projects.
For further information on environmental matters see Part I, Item 3, Legal
Proceedings, "Environmental."
Other
The Company is also the subject of, or a party to, a number of other
pending or threatened legal actions involving a variety of matters incidental to
its business.
Concentration of Credit
Substantially all of the Company's sales and operating revenues are
generated from its U.S. and European operations. A significant portion of the
Company's sales are made to customers in the aerospace industry. The
concentration of aerospace customers may expose the Company to cyclical, credit
and other risks generally associated with the aerospace industry. In the three
years ended December 31, 1997, no single customer accounted for as much as 10%
of consolidated sales. Trade accounts receivable are generally not secured or
collateralized.
The ultimate resolution of these foregoing contingencies could,
individually or in the aggregate, be material to the consolidated financial
statements. However, management believes that the Company will remain a viable
and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these matters could
be resolved unfavorably.
NOTE 15--STOCK OPTION AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD PLANS:
1995 STOCK PLAN
The RMI Titanium Company 1995 Stock Plan, which was approved by a vote of
the Company's shareholders at the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, replaced
both the 1989 Stock Option Incentive Plan and the 1989 Employee Restricted Stock
Award Plan. The Plan permits the grant of any or all of the following types of
awards in any combination: a) Stock Options; b) Stock Appreciation Rights; and
c) Restricted Stock. A committee appointed by the Board of Directors administers
the Plan, and determines the type or types of grants to be made under the Plan
and sets forth in each such Grant the terms, conditions and limitations
applicable to it, including, in certain cases, provisions relating to a possible
change in control of the Company.
36
<PAGE> 39
During 1997, 109,500 option shares were granted at a price of $25.5625. In
1996, 215,000 option shares were granted at a price of $21.62. Options are
granted at the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of the
grant. The 1997 and 1996 options are for a term of ten years from the date of
the grant, and vest ratably over three year periods beginning with the date of
the grant. All 1997 grants were outstanding at December 31, 1997. No option
grants were made in 1995.
During 1997 and 1996, 34,950 shares and 51,000 shares, respectively, of
restricted stock were granted under the 1995 Stock Plan at the fair market value
on the date of the grant. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the
vesting period of each grant which is typically five years.
The following table presents a summary of stock option activity under the
plans described above for the years ended December 31, 1995 through 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES PRICE
-------- -----
<S> <C> <C>
Balance December 31, 1994.............................. 687,744 $ 2.80 - 13.32
Granted................................................ -- --
Exercised.............................................. (54,478) 2.80 - 6.91
Forfeited.............................................. (18,094) 2.80 - 13.32
-------- ----------------
Balance December 31, 1995.............................. 615,172 $ 2.80 - 13.32
Granted................................................ 215,000 21.62
Exercised.............................................. (297,072) 2.80 - 13.32
Forfeited.............................................. -- --
-------- ----------------
Balance December 31, 1996.............................. 533,100 $ 2.80 - 13.32
-------- ----------------
Granted................................................ 109,500 25.5625
Exercised.............................................. (125,209) 2.80 - 21.62
Forfeited.............................................. -- --
-------- ----------------
Balance December 31, 1997.............................. 517,391 $ 2.80 - 25.5625
======== ================
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1997, the weighted average exercise price and weighted
average remaining contractual life for all outstanding options was $16.21 and
7.6 years, respectively. At December 31, 1997, options covering 133,491 shares
were exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $9.26.
For the purposes of the fair value requirements of SFAS No. 123, a widely
accepted option pricing model was used. If compensation expense for the
Company's stock options granted in 1997 and 1996 had been determined based on
the fair value at the grant date for the awards in accordance with SFAS No. 123,
the effect on the Company's net income and earnings per share for the years
ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 would have been $1.1 million, $0.05 per share
and $0.8 million, $0.04 per share, respectively.
NOTE 16--SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED):
The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial data for 1997
and 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH
1997 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER(1) QUARTER
---- ------- ------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales......................................... $73,708 $75,034 $86,438 $83,350
Gross profit.................................. 15,776 16,721 19,814 20,532
Operating income.............................. 12,346 13,218 15,213 15,538
Net income.................................... 10,918 12,090 22,542 14,535
Net income per share:
Basic....................................... 0.54 0.59 1.10 0.71
Diluted..................................... 0.52 0.57 1.08 0.69
</TABLE>
37
<PAGE> 40
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH
1996 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER(1) QUARTER
---- ------- ------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales......................................... $54,597 $58,310 $64,479 $73,971
Gross profit.................................. 9,347 10,280 11,625 14,357
Operating income.............................. 6,432 7,410 8,660 11,228
Net income.................................... 4,556 5,981 10,838 10,384
Net income per share:
Basic....................................... 0.30 0.33 0.54 0.51
Diluted..................................... 0.29 0.32 0.53 0.50
</TABLE>
- ---------
(1) Net income was favorably affected by the recognition of a $8.7 million
income tax benefit in 1997 and a $2.6 million tax benefit in 1996.
38
<PAGE> 41
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
In addition to the information set forth under the caption "Executive
Officers of the Registrant" in Part I, Item 1 of this report, information
concerning the directors of the Company is incorporated by reference to
"Election of Directors" on pages 5 through 8 of the 1998 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to "The
Board of Directors--Compensation of Directors" on page 5 and Executive
Compensation" on pages 11 through 13, of the 1998 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to "Other
Information--Security Ownership" on page 10 of the 1998 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to "Other
Information--Certain Transactions" on page 17 of the 1998 Proxy Statement.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(A) (1) AND (2) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See "Financial Statements."
(3) SEE INDEX TO EXHIBITS.
(B) REPORT ON FORM 8-K FILED IN THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 1997
None.
(C) EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed on the Index to Exhibits are filed herewith or are
incorporated by reference.
39
<PAGE> 42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
By /s/ TIMOTHY G. RUPERT
--------------------------------------
Timothy G. Rupert
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
Dated: March 25, 1998
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE AND TITLE DATE
------------------- ----
<S> <C>
CRAIG R. ANDERSSON, Director;
NEIL A. ARMSTRONG, Director;
DANIEL I. BOOKER, Director;
RONALD L. GALLATIN, Director;
CHARLES C. GEDEON, Director;
ROBERT M. HERNANDEZ, Director;
DANA J. JOHNSON, Director;
JOHN H. ODLE, Director;
TIMOTHY G. RUPERT, Director;
WESLEY W. VON SCHACK, Director
By /s/ TIMOTHY G. RUPERT March 25, 1998
---------------------------------------------------------
T. G. Rupert
Director and Attorney-in-Fact
/s/ TIMOTHY G. RUPERT March 25, 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------
T. G. Rupert
Executive Vice President
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ JOHN H. ODLE March 25, 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------
John H. Odle
Executive Vice President
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ TIMOTHY G. RUPERT March 25, 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------
T. G. Rupert
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
</TABLE>
40
<PAGE> 43
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEQUENTIAL
EXHIBIT PAGE
NO. DESCRIPTION NUMBER
--- ----------- ------
<C> <S> <C>
2.0 Amended and Restated Reorganization Agreement, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-30667 Amendment No. 1.
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended March
31, 1994, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 1994.
3.2 Amended Code of Regulations of the Company, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
4.1 Credit Agreement between RMI Titanium Company and PNC Bank,
National Association dated as of April 15, 1996,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 333-01553 Amendment
No. 2.
10.1 Agreement for the sale and purchase of titanium
tetrachloride between SCM Chemicals, Inc., and RMI Titanium
Company dated March 9, 1993, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1992.+
10.2 Agreement for the supply, purchase and sale of chlorine
between SCM Chemicals, Inc., and RMI Titanium Company dated
as of November 13, 1990, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1990.
10.3 RMI Company Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-30667 Amendment No. 2.
10.4 RMI Titanium Company 1989 Stock Option Incentive Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-30667 Amendment
No. 2.
10.5 RMI Titanium Company Supplemental Pension Plan effective
August 1, 1987, and amended as of December 12, 1990,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1990.
10.6 RMI Titanium Company 1989 Employee Restricted Stock Award
Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-30667
Amendment No. 2.
10.7 Amendment to RMI Titanium Company 1989 Employee Restricted
Stock Award Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1990.
10.8 RMI Titanium Company Excess Benefits Plan effective July 18,
1991, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1991.
10.9 Sales Agreement for the supply of titanium sponge and plasma
electrodes between Oregon Metallurgical Corporation and RMI
Titanium Company dated as of August 8, 1994 incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.+
</TABLE>
41
<PAGE> 44
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEQUENTIAL
EXHIBIT PAGE
NO. DESCRIPTION NUMBER
--- ----------- ------
<C> <S> <C>
10.10 Sales Agreement for the supply of titanium sponge between
Osaka Titanium Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Corporation, Sumitomo
Corporation of America, and RMI Titanium Company dated as of
September 4, 1992 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1995.+
10.11 RMI Titanium Company 1995 Stock Plan incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.
10.12 Employment agreement, dated September 1, 1996, between the
Company and John H. Odle, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996.
10.13 Employment agreement, dated September 1, 1996, between the
Company and T. G. Rupert, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996.
10.14 Employment agreement dated May 20, 1997 between the Company
and Harry B. Watkins, filed herewith.
10.15 Employment agreement dated May 1, 1997 between the Company
and Dawne S. Hickton, filed herewith.
10.16 Registration Rights Agreement dated August 21, 1996 between
the Company and USX Corporation, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996.
21 Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP.
24 Powers of Attorney.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
27.1 Financial Statements of The RMI Employee Savings and
Investment Plan for the year ended December 31, 1997 (to be
filed by amendment).
27.1 Financial Statements of The RMI Bargaining Unit Employee
Savings and Investment Plan for the year ended December 31,
1997 (to be filed by amendment).
</TABLE>
- ---------
+ Confidential treatment has been requested.
42
<PAGE> 1
Exhibit 10.14
May 20, 1997
Harry B. Watkins
Vice President -
Technical Marketing & Tubular Group
RMI Titanium Company
1000 Warren Avenue
Niles, Ohio 44446-0269
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This Letter Agreement sets forth the basis upon which I have been authorized by
the Board of Directors of RMI Titanium Company ("Company") to continue your
employment in the officer position described in Paragraph 1 below for the
Employment Period (as hereinafter defined). The "Employment Period" shall
initially be the period June 1, 1997 through May 31, 2000; provided, however,
that on June 1, 2000 and each June 1 thereafter, the Employment Period shall
automatically be extended for one additional year unless, not later than the
immediately preceding February 1, either you or the Company shall have given
written notice to the other that you or it does not wish to extend the
Employment Period; and provided further that the Employment Period shall
terminate automatically when you attain age sixty-five (65). In the event this
Letter Agreement is terminated for any reason other than your death, your
obligations as set forth in Paragraph 9 shall survive and be enforceable
notwithstanding such termination. This Letter Agreement supersedes and replaces
in its entirety the Letter Agreement between you and the Company dated January
21, 1997.
1. During the Employment Period, you will serve as Vice
President, Technical Marketing & Tubular Group, of the
Company (or on any other officer position within the
Company to which you may hereafter be elected by the
Company's Board of Directors), performing all duties and
functions appropriate to that office, as well as such
additional duties as the Company's Executive Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer or Board of Directors
may, from time to time, assign to you. During the
Employment Period, you will devote your full time and
best efforts to the performance of all such duties.
<PAGE> 2
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 2
2. During the Employment Period, the Company will pay you,
in equal monthly installments, as compensation for your
services an annual salary of $130,000.00. This annual
salary may be increased from time to time in the sole
discretion of the Company, but may only be decreased by
the Company with your written consent. Such annual
salary, whether increased or decreased, shall constitute
your "Base Salary". In addition, you may be awarded such
bonuses as the Board of Directors of the Company
determines to be appropriate under the Company's Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan or any successor bonus plan.
You will also be eligible to participate in the Company's
1995 Stock Plan, or any successor stock plan.
3. In the event of your death during the Employment Period, your
right to all compensation under this Letter Agreement
allocable to days subsequent to your death shall terminate and
no further payments shall be due to you, your personal
representative, or your estate, except for that portion, if
any, of your Base Salary that is accrued and unpaid upon the
date of your death.
4. In the event you become physically or mentally disabled,
in the sole judgment of physicians selected by the
Company's Board of Directors, such that you cannot
perform the duties and functions contracted for pursuant
to this Letter Agreement, and should such disability
continue for at least 180 consecutive days (or in the
judgment of such physicians, be likely to continue for at
least 180 consecutive days), the Company may terminate
your employment upon written notice to you. If your
employment is terminated because of physical or mental
disability, your right to all compensation under this
Letter Agreement allocable to days subsequent to such
termination shall terminate and no further payments shall
be due to you, your personal representative, or your
estate, except for that portion, if any, of your Base
Salary that is accrued and unpaid upon the date of
termination.
5. The Company may, upon written notice to you fixing the
date of termination, terminate your services during the
Employment Period for Cause, (as Cause is defined in
Paragraph 7(c) below). In such event, your right to
receive continued compensation under this Letter
Agreement will terminate and no further installments will
be paid to you, except for that portion, if any, of your
Base Salary that is accrued and unpaid upon the date of
termination.
<PAGE> 3
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 3
6. In addition to your annual Base Salary as set forth in
Paragraph 2 above, you will be entitled in each calendar
year to a vacation with pay in accordance with the
vacation policies of the Company. You will also be
entitled to: (1) participate in all of the Company's
existing and future employee benefit programs applicable
to officers of the Company in accordance with the terms
of such benefit program plan documents; (2) receive one
comprehensive physical examination, at Company expense,
in each calendar year, such examination to be conducted
by the Cleveland Clinic or comparable facility and
provided in accordance with terms and conditions
comparable to those applicable to medical examinations
for USX executive officers; and (3) tax preparation and
financial planning advice under terms and conditions
comparable to those applicable to USX executive
management.
7. Change of Control Provisions
(a) For purposes of this Letter Agreement, a "Change in
Control" of the Company shall mean a change in
control of a nature that would be required to be
reported by it in response to Item 6(e) of Schedule
14A of Regulation 14A promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), whether or not the Company is then
subject to such reporting requirement; provided,
that, without limitation, such a change in control
shall be deemed to have occurred if:
(1) Any person (within the meaning of that term
as used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the
Exchange Act (a "Person") is or becomes the
"beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), directly or
indirectly, of securities of the Company
representing twenty percent (20%) or more of
the combined voting power of the Company's
then outstanding voting securities;
provided, however, that for purposes of this
Agreement the term "Person" shall not
include (i) the Company or any of its
majority-owned subsidiaries, (ii) a trustee
or other fiduciary holding securities under
an employee benefit plan of the Company or
any of its subsidiaries, (iii) an
underwriter temporarily holding securities
pursuant to an offering of such securities,
or (iv) a corporation owned, directly or
indirectly, by the stockholders of
<PAGE> 4
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 4
the Company in substantially the same
proportions as their ownership of stock of
the Company, (v) USX Corporation; or
(2) The following individuals cease for any
reason to constitute a majority of the
number of directors then serving on the
Board of Directors of the Company;
individuals who, on the date hereof, are
serving as directors on the Board and any
new director (other than a director whose
initial assumption of office is in
connection with an actual or threatened
election contest, including but not limited
to a consent solicitation, relating to the
election of directors of the Company) whose
appointment or election by the Board or
nomination for election by the Company's
stockholders was approved by a vote of at
least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then
still in office who either were directors on
the date hereof or whose appointment,
election or nomination for election was
previously so approved, or
(3) There is consummated a merger or
consolidation of the Company or a subsidiary
thereof with any other corporation, other
than a merger or consolidation which would
result in the holders of the voting
securities of the Company outstanding
immediately prior thereto holding securities
which represent immediately after such
merger or consolidation at least 50% of the
combined voting power of the voting
securities of the entity surviving the
merger or consolidation, (or the parent of
such surviving entity) or the shareholders
of the Company approve a plan of complete
liquidation of the Company, or there is
consummated the sale or other disposition of
all or substantially all of the
Corporation's assets.
(b) If any of the events described above constituting a
Change in Control of the Company shall have
occurred, you shall be entitled to the benefits
provided in Paragraph 7(f) hereof upon the
termination of your employment during the term of
this Letter Agreement unless such termination is
(i) because of your death or disability, (ii) by
the Company for Cause, (iii) by you other than for
Good Reason, or (iv) on or after the date that you
<PAGE> 5
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 5
attain age sixty-five (65). In the event your
employment with the Company is terminated for any
reason prior to the occurrence of a Change in
Control, you shall not be entitled to any benefits
under this Paragraph 7; provided, however, that if
your employment is terminated prior to a Change in
Control without Cause at the direction of a person
who has entered into an agreement with the Company,
the consummation of which will constitute a Change in
Control, your employment shall be deemed to have
terminated following a Change in Control. Your
entitlement to benefits under any of the Company's
retirement plans will not adversely affect your
rights to receive payments hereunder.
(c) Termination by the Company of your employment for
"Cause" shall mean termination upon (i) the willful
and continued failure by you to substantially
perform your duties with the Company (other than
any such failure resulting from termination by you
for Good Reason), after a demand for substantial
performance is delivered to you that specifically
identifies the manner in which the Company believes
that you have not substantially performed your
duties, and you have failed to resume substantial
performance of your duties on a continuous basis
within fourteen (14) days of receiving such demand,
(ii) the willful engaging by you in conduct which
is demonstrably and materially injurious to the
Company, monetarily or otherwise or (iii) your
conviction of any felony or conviction of a
misdemeanor which impairs your ability
substantially to perform your duties with the
Company. For purposes of this paragraph, no act,
or failure to act, on your part shall be deemed
"willful" unless done, or omitted to be done, by
you not in good faith and without reasonable belief
that your action or omission was in the best
interest of the Company.
(d) For purposes of this Letter Agreement, "Good Reason"
shall mean, without your express written consent, the
occurrence after a Change in Control of the Company
of any one or more of the following:
(1) The assignment to you of duties inconsistent
with your position immediately prior to the
Change in Control;
<PAGE> 6
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 6
(2) A reduction or alteration in the nature of
your position, duties, status or
responsibilities from those in effect
immediately prior to the Change in Control;
(3) The failure by the Company to continue in
effect any of the Company's employee benefit
plans, programs, policies, practices or
arrangements in which you participate (or
substantially equivalent successor or
replacement employee benefit plans,
programs, policies, practices or
arrangements) or the failure by the Company
to continue your participation therein on
substantially the same basis, both in terms
of the amount of benefits provided and the
level of your participation relative to
other participants, as existed immediately
prior to the Change in Control;
(4) The failure of the Company to obtain a
satisfactory agreement from any successor to
the Company to assume and agree to perform
this Letter Agreement;
(5) Any purported termination by the Company of
your employment that is not effected
pursuant to a Notice of Termination
satisfying the requirements of Subparagraph
(e) below, and for purposes of this Letter
Agreement, no such purported termination
shall be effective; and
(6) The Company's requiring you to be based at a
location in excess of fifty (50) miles from
the location where you are based immediately
prior to the Change in Control.
(e) Any termination by the Company for Cause or by you
for Good Reason shall be communicated by Notice of
Termination to the other party hereto. For
purposes of this Letter Agreement, a "Notice of
Termination" shall mean a written notice which
shall indicate the specific termination provision
in this Letter Agreement relied upon and shall set
forth in reasonable detail the facts and
circumstances claimed to provide a basis for
termination of your employment under the provision
so indicated.
<PAGE> 7
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 7
(f) Following a Change in Control of the Company, as
defined above, upon termination of your employment
you shall be entitled to the following benefits:
(1) If your employment shall be terminated by
the Company for Cause or by you other than
for Good Reason, the Company shall pay you
your full Base Salary through the date of
termination at the rate in effect at the
time Notice of Termination is given, plus
all other amounts to which you are entitled
under any compensation plan of the Company
at the time such payments are due, and the
Company shall have no further obligations to
you under this Agreement.
(2) If your employment terminates by reason of
your death or disability, your benefits
shall be determined in accordance with
Paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Letter Agreement
and the Company's retirement, survivor's
benefits, insurance and other applicable
programs and plans, then in effect.
(3) If your employment by the Company shall be
terminated (i) by the Company other than for
Cause, your death or disability, or (ii) by
you for Good Reason, you shall be entitled
to the benefits (the "Severance Payments")
provided in Paragraphs 7(f)(3), (i), (ii),
(iii), (iv) and (v) following, which
Severance Payments shall be in lieu of and
cancel any further rights you have to
receive any Base Salary that would be
otherwise due under Paragraph 2 of this
Letter Agreement:
(i) The Company shall pay you your full
Base Salary through the date of
termination at the rate in effect at
the time Notice of Termination is
given;
(ii) The Company will pay as severance
benefits to you, not later than the
fifth day following the date of
termination, a lump sum severance
payment (the "Severance Payment")
equal to the product of (1) a
fraction, the numerator of which is
equal to the lesser of (x)
twenty-four (24) or (y) the number of
full and partial months existing
between the date
<PAGE> 8
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 8
of termination and your sixty-fifth
(65th) birthday and the denominator
of which is equal to twelve (12),
and (2) the sum of (x) your annual
Base Salary in effect immediately
prior to the occurrence of the
circumstances giving rise to such
termination, and (y) the amount, if
any, of the arithmetic average of
the annual bonuses awarded to you
under any annual bonus plan of the
Company calculated using the two (2)
years immediately preceding date of
termination;
(iii) The Options previously issued to you
under any option or incentive plan of
the Company to purchase shares of
Common Stock of the Company (Option
Shares), as well as any previously
unvested shares of Restricted Stock
granted to you, shall irrevocably
vest upon any such termination and
the stock options for such Option
Shares shall become thereafter
uncancellable by the Company;
(iv) In the event that you become entitled
to the Severance Payments, if any of
the Severance Payments or other
portion of the Total Payments (as
defined below) will be subject to the
tax (the "Excise Tax") imposed by
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), the Company shall pay to you
at the time specified below, an
additional amount (the "Gross-Up
Payment") such that the net amount
retained by you, after deduction of
(1) any Excise Tax on the Severance
Payments and such other Total
Payments, and (2) any federal, state
and local income tax, FICA-Health
Insurance tax, and Excise Tax upon
the payment provided for by this
paragraph, shall be equal to the
Severance Payments and such other
total Payments. For purposes of
determining whether any of the
payments will be subject to the
Excise Tax and the amount of such
Excise Tax, (1) any other payments or
benefits received or to be received
by you in connection with a Change in
Control of the Company or your
<PAGE> 9
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 9
termination of employment whether
pursuant to the terms of this Letter
Agreement or any other plan,
arrangement or agreement with the
Company, any person whose actions
result in a Change of Control of the
Company or any person affiliated
with the Company or such person
(together with the Severance
Payment, the "Total Payments") shall
be treated as "parachute payments"
within the meaning of Section
280G(b)(2) of the Code, and all
"excess parachute payments" within
the meaning of Section 280G(b)(1)
shall be treated as subject to the
Excise Tax, except to the extent
that in the opinion of tax counsel
selected by the Company's
independent auditors and acceptable
by you such other payments or
benefits (in whole or in part) do
not constitute parachute payments,
or such excess parachute payments
(in whole or in part) represent
reasonable compensation for services
actually rendered within the meaning
of Section 280G(b)(4) of the Code in
excess of the base amount within the
meaning of Section 280G(b)(3) of the
Code, or are otherwise not subject
to the Excise Tax, (2) the amount of
the Total Payments which shall be
treated as subject to the Excise Tax
shall be equal to the lesser of (A)
the total amount of the Total
Payments or (B) the amount of excess
parachute payments within the
meaning of Section 280G(b)(1) (after
applying clause (1), above), and (3)
the value of any non-cash benefits
or any deferred payment or benefit
shall be determined by the Company's
independent auditors in accordance
with the principles of Sections
280G(d)(3) and (4) of the Code. For
purposes of determining the amount
of the Gross-Up Payment, you shall
be deemed to pay federal income
taxes at the highest marginal rate
of federal income taxation in the
calendar year in which the Gross-Up
Payment is to be made and state and
local income taxes at the highest
marginal rate of taxation in the
state and locality of your residence
on the date of termination, net
<PAGE> 10
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 10
of the maximum reduction in federal
income taxes which could be obtained
from deduction of such state and
local taxes. In the event that the
Excise Tax is subsequently
determined to be less than the
amount taken into account hereunder
at the time of termination of your
employment, you shall repay to the
Company at the time that the amount
of such reduction in Excise Tax is
finally determined the portion of
the Gross-Up Payment attributable to
such reduction (plus the portion of
the Gross-Up Payment attributable to
the Excise Tax and federal and state
and local income tax imposed on the
Gross-Up Payment being repaid by you
if such repayment results in a
reduction in Excise Tax and/or a
federal and state and local income
tax deduction) plus interest on the
amount of such repayment at the rate
provided in Section 1274(b)(2)(B) of
the Code. In the event that the
Excise Tax is determined to exceed
the amount taken into account
hereunder at the time of the
termination of your employment
(including by reason of any payment
the existence or amount of which
cannot be determined at the time of
the Gross-Up Payment), the Company
shall make an additional Gross-Up
Payment in respect of such excess
(plus any interest payable with
respect to such excess) at the time
that the amount of such excess is
finally determined.
The payments provided for in the
paragraph above shall be made not
later than the fifth day following
the date of termination; provided,
however, that if the amounts of such
payments cannot be finally
determined on or before such day,
the Company shall pay to you on such
day an estimate as determined in
good faith by the Company of the
minimum amount of such payments and
shall pay the remainder of such
payments (together with interest at
the rate provided in Section
1274(b)(2)(B) of the Code) as soon
as the amount thereof can be
determined but in no event later
than the thirtieth day
<PAGE> 11
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 11
after the date of termination. In
the event that the amount of the
estimated payments exceeds the
amount subsequently determined to
have been due, such excess shall
constitute a loan by the Company to
you payable on the fifth day after
demand by the Company (together with
interest at the rate provided in
Section 1274(b)(2)(B) of the Code);
(v) The Company shall also pay to you all
legal fees and expenses incurred by
you as a result of such termination
of employment (including all such
fees and expenses, if any, incurred
in contesting or disputing any such
termination or in seeking to obtain
or enforce any right or benefit
provided by this Letter Agreement or
in connection with any tax audit or
proceeding to the extent attributable
to the application of Section 4999 of
the Code to any payment or benefit
provided hereunder); and
(vi) For a twenty-four (24) month period
after date of termination, the
Company will arrange to provide you
at the Company's expense with life,
disability, accident and health
insurance benefits substantially
similar to those which you were
receiving immediately prior to the
Notice of Termination; but benefits
otherwise receivable by you pursuant
to this paragraph shall be reduced to
the extent comparable benefits are
actually received by you during the
twenty-four (24) month period
following your termination, and any
such benefits actually received by
you shall be reported to the Company.
(h) You shall not be required to mitigate the amount of
any Severance Payments provided for in this
Paragraph 7 by seeking other employment or
otherwise, nor, except as provided in Paragraph
(vi) above, shall the amount of any payment or
benefit provided for in this Paragraph 7 be reduced
by any compensation or benefit earned by you as the
result of employment by another employer after the
date of termination, or otherwise.
<PAGE> 12
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 12
(i) The Company will require any successor (whether
direct or indirect, by purchase, merger,
consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially
all of the business and/or assets of the Company or
of any division or subsidiary thereof employing you
to expressly assume and agree to perform this
Letter Agreement in the same manner and to the same
extent that the Company would be required to
perform it if no such succession had taken place.
Failure of the Company to obtain such assumption
and agreement prior to the effectiveness of any
such succession shall be a breach of this Letter
Agreement and shall entitle you to compensation
from the Company in the same amount and on the same
terms as you would be entitled hereunder if you
terminate your employment for Good Reason.
8. This Letter Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and
be enforceable by your personal or legal representatives,
executors, administrators, successors, heirs,
distributees, devisees and legatees. If you should die
while any amount would still be payable to you hereunder
if you had continued to live, all such amounts, unless
otherwise provided herein, shall be paid in accordance
with the terms of this Letter Agreement, to your devisee,
legatee or other designee or, if there is not such
designee, to your estate.
9. As additional consideration for the compensation and
benefits provided to you pursuant to this Letter
Agreement, you agree that you will not, for a period of
twenty-four (24) months after the end of the Employment
Period, or the termination of your employment with the
Company (whichever first occurs), directly or indirectly,
compete with, engage in the same business as, be employed
by, act a consultant to, or be a director, officer,
employee, owner or partner, or otherwise participate in
or assist (including, without limitation, by soliciting
customers for, or individuals to provide services to),
any business or organization which competes with the
Company; provided, that this restriction shall not apply
if you terminate your employment with the Company for
Good Reason after a Change in Control of the Company.
For purposes of this Paragraph 9, you will not be deemed
to have breached your commitment merely because you own,
directly or indirectly, not more than one percent (1%) of
the outstanding common stock of such a corporation if, at
the time you acquire such stock, such stock is listed on
a national securities exchange or is regularly traded in
the over-the-counter market by a member of either a
<PAGE> 13
Mr. Harry B. Watkins
May 20, 1997
Page 13
national securities exchange or the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. In order to protect the interest of
the Company, you will also maintain in strict confidence and
not disclose to any other person or entity any information
received from any source in the Company or developed by you in
the course of performing your duties for the Company. This
obligation shall not extend to: (a) anything you can establish
as known to you from a source outside the Company, (b)
anything which has been published or becomes published
hereafter other than by you, or (c) anything which you receive
from a non-Company source without restriction on its
disclosure. Should you breach or threaten to breach the
commitments in this Paragraph 9, and in recognition of the
fact that the Company would not under such circumstances be
adequately compensated by money damages, the Company shall be
entitled, in addition to any other rights and remedies
available to it, to an injunction restraining you from such
breach. Further, you acknowledge and agree that the provisions
of this Paragraph 9 are necessary, reasonable, and
proportionate to protect the Company during such
non-competition period.
10. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of
this Letter Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Ohio.
If the provisions of this Letter Agreement are acceptable to you, please sign
one original copy of this Letter Agreement and return it to me. You may retain
the second signed original for your files.
Very truly yours,
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
By:
--------------------------
TIMOTHY G. RUPERT
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
CONFIRMED:
- ---------------------------- DATE:
HARRY B. WATKINS -----------------------
Vice President -
Technical Marketing & Tubular Group
<PAGE> 1
Exhibit 10.15
May 1, 1997
Dawne S. Hickton
Burns, White & Hickton
Attorneys at Law
2400 Fifth Avenue Place
120 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3001
Dear Ms. Hickton:
This Letter Agreement sets forth the basis upon which I have been authorized by
the Board of Directors of RMI Titanium Company ("Company") to employ you in the
executive officer position described in Paragraph 1 below for the Employment
Period (as hereinafter defined). The "Employment Period" shall initially be the
period June 1, 1997 through May 31, 2000; provided, however, that on June 1,
2000 and each June 1 thereafter, the Employment Period shall automatically be
extended for one additional year unless, not later than the immediately
preceding February 1, either you or the Company shall have given written notice
to the other that you or it does not wish to extend the Employment Period; and
provided further that the Employment Period shall terminate automatically when
you attain age sixty-five (65). In the event this Letter Agreement is terminated
for any reason other than your death, your obligations as set forth in Paragraph
9 shall survive and be enforceable notwithstanding such termination.
1. During the Employment Period, you will serve as Vice President &
General Counsel of the Company (or on any other executive officer
position within the Company to which you may hereafter be elected by
the Company's Board of Directors), performing all duties and functions
appropriate to that office, as well as such additional duties as the
Company's Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer or Board
of Directors may, from time to time, assign to you. During the
Employment Period, you will devote your full time and best efforts to
the performance of all such duties.
<PAGE> 2
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 2
2. During the Employment Period, the Company will pay you, in equal
monthly installments, as compensation for your services an annual
salary of $110,000.00. This annual salary may be increased from time
to time in the sole discretion of the Company, but may only be
decreased by the Company with your written consent. Such annual
salary, whether increased or decreased, shall constitute your "Base
Salary". In addition, you may be awarded such bonuses as the Board of
Directors of the Company determines to be appropriate under the
Company's Annual Incentive Compensation Plan or any successor bonus
plan. You will also be eligible to participate in the Company's 1995
Stock Plan, or any successor stock plan.
3. In the event of your death during the Employment Period, your right to
all compensation under this Letter Agreement allocable to days
subsequent to your death shall terminate and no further payments shall
be due to you, your personal representative, or your estate, except
for that portion, if any, of your Base Salary that is accrued and
unpaid upon the date of your death.
4. In the event you become physically or mentally disabled, in the sole
judgment of physicians selected by the Company's Board of Directors,
such that you cannot perform the duties and functions contracted for
pursuant to this Letter Agreement, and should such disability continue
for at least 180 consecutive days (or in the judgment of such
physicians, be likely to continue for at least 180 consecutive days),
the Company may terminate your employment upon written notice to you.
If your employment is terminated because of physical or mental
disability, your right to all compensation under this Letter Agreement
allocable to days subsequent to such termination shall terminate and
no further payments shall be due to you, your personal representative,
or your estate, except for that portion, if any, of your Base Salary
that is accrued and unpaid upon the date of termination.
5. The Company may, upon written notice to you fixing the date of
termination, terminate your services during the Employment Period for
Cause, (as Cause is defined in Paragraph 7(c) below). In such event,
your right to receive continued compensation under this Letter
Agreement will terminate and no further installments will be paid to
you, except for that portion, if any, of your Base Salary that is
accrued and unpaid upon the date of termination.
<PAGE> 3
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 3
6. In addition to your annual Base Salary as set forth in Paragraph 2
above, you will be entitled in each calendar year to a vacation with
pay in accordance with the vacation policies of the Company. You will
also be entitled to: (1) participate in all of the Company's existing
and future employee benefit programs applicable to officers of the
Company in accordance with the terms of such benefit program plan
documents; (2) receive one comprehensive physical examination, at
Company expense, in each calendar year, such examination to be
conducted by the Cleveland Clinic or comparable facility and provided
in accordance with terms and conditions comparable to those applicable
to medical examinations for USX executive officers; and (3) tax
preparation and financial planning advice under terms and conditions
comparable to those applicable to USX executive management.
7. Change of Control Provisions
(a) For purposes of this Letter Agreement, a "Change in Control" of
the Company shall mean a change in control of a nature that would
be required to be reported by it in response to Item 6(e) of
Schedule 14A of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), whether or
not the Company is then subject to such reporting requirement;
provided, that, without limitation, such a change in control
shall be deemed to have occurred if:
(1) Any person (within the meaning of that term as used in
Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act (a "Person") is
or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of
securities of the Company representing twenty percent (20%)
or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then
outstanding voting securities; provided, however, that for
purposes of this Agreement the term "Person" shall not
include (i) the Company or any of its majority-owned
subsidiaries, (ii) a trustee or other fiduciary holding
securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or
any of its subsidiaries, (iii) an underwriter temporarily
holding securities pursuant to an offering of such
securities, or (iv) a corporation owned, directly or
indirectly, by the stockholders of
<PAGE> 4
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 4
the Company in substantially the same proportions as their
ownership of stock of the Company, (v) USX Corporation; or
(2) The following individuals cease for any reason to constitute a
majority of the number of directors then serving on the Board of
Directors of the Company; individuals who, on the date hereof, are
serving as directors on the Board and any new director (other than a
director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an
actual or threatened election contest, including but not limited to a
consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of the
Company) whose appointment or election by the Board or nomination for
election by the Company's stockholders was approved by a vote of at
least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who
either were directors on the date hereof or whose appointment,
election or nomination for election was previously so approved, or
(3) There is consummated a merger or consolidation of the Company or a
subsidiary thereof with any other corporation, other than a merger or
consolidation which would result in the holders of the voting
securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto
holding securities which represent immediately after such merger or
consolidation at least 50% of the combined voting power of the voting
securities of the entity surviving the merger or consolidation, (or
the parent of such surviving entity) or the shareholders of the
Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company, or
there is consummated the sale or other disposition of all or
substantially all of the Corporation's assets.
(b) If any of the events described above constituting a Change in
Control of the Company shall have occurred, you shall be entitled
to the benefits provided in Paragraph 7(f) hereof upon the
termination of your employment during the term of this Letter
Agreement unless such termination is (i) because of your death or
disability, (ii) by the Company for Cause, (iii) by you other
than for Good Reason, or (iv) on or after the date that you
<PAGE> 5
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 5
attain age sixty-five (65). In the event your employment with the
Company is terminated for any reason prior to the occurrence of a
Change in Control, you shall not be entitled to any benefits
under this Paragraph 7; provided, however, that if your
employment is terminated prior to a Change in Control without
Cause at the direction of a person who has entered into an
agreement with the Company, the consummation of which will
constitute a Change in Control, your employment shall be deemed
to have terminated following a Change in Control. Your
entitlement to benefits under any of the Company's retirement
plans will not adversely affect your rights to receive payments
hereunder.
(c) Termination by the Company of your employment for "Cause" shall
mean termination upon (i) the willful and continued failure by
you to substantially perform your duties with the Company (other
than any such failure resulting from termination by you for Good
Reason), after a demand for substantial performance is delivered
to you that specifically identifies the manner in which the
Company believes that you have not substantially performed your
duties, and you have failed to resume substantial performance of
your duties on a continuous basis within fourteen (14) days of
receiving such demand, (ii) the willful engaging by you in
conduct which is demonstrably and materially injurious to the
Company, monetarily or otherwise or (iii) your conviction of any
felony or conviction of a misdemeanor which impairs your ability
substantially to perform your duties with the Company. For
purposes of this paragraph, no act, or failure to act, on your
part shall be deemed "willful" unless done, or omitted to be
done, by you not in good faith and without reasonable belief that
your action or omission was in the best interest of the Company.
(d) For purposes of this Letter Agreement, "Good Reason" shall mean,
without your express written consent, the occurrence after a
Change in Control of the Company of any one or more of the
following:
(1) The assignment to you of duties inconsistent with your
position immediately prior to the Change in Control;
<PAGE> 6
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 6
(2) A reduction or alteration in the nature of your position,
duties, status or responsibilities from those in effect
immediately prior to the Change in Control;
(3) The failure by the Company to continue in effect any of the
Company's employee benefit plans, programs, policies,
practices or arrangements in which you participate (or
substantially equivalent successor or replacement employee
benefit plans, programs, policies, practices or
arrangements) or the failure by the Company to continue your
participation therein on substantially the same basis, both
in terms of the amount of benefits provided and the level of
your participation relative to other participants, as
existed immediately prior to the Change in Control;
(4) The failure of the Company to obtain a satisfactory
agreement from any successor to the Company to assume and
agree to perform this Letter Agreement;
(5) Any purported termination by the Company of your employment
that is not effected pursuant to a Notice of Termination
satisfying the requirements of Subparagraph (e) below, and
for purposes of this Letter Agreement, no such purported
termination shall be effective; and
(6) The Company's requiring you to be based at a location in
excess of fifty (50) miles from the location where you are
based immediately prior to the Change in Control.
(e) Any termination by the Company for Cause or by you for Good
Reason shall be communicated by Notice of Termination to the
other party hereto. For purposes of this Letter Agreement, a
"Notice of Termination" shall mean a written notice which shall
indicate the specific termination provision in this Letter
Agreement relied upon and shall set forth in reasonable detail
the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for
termination of your employment under the provision so indicated.
<PAGE> 7
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 7
(f) Following a Change in Control of the Company, as defined above,
upon termination of your employment you shall be entitled to the
following benefits:
(1) If your employment shall be terminated by the Company for
Cause or by you other than for Good Reason, the Company
shall pay you your full Base Salary through the date of
termination at the rate in effect at the time Notice of
Termination is given, plus all other amounts to which you
are entitled under any compensation plan of the Company at
the time such payments are due, and the Company shall have
no further obligations to you under this Agreement.
(2) If your employment terminates by reason of your death or
disability, your benefits shall be determined in accordance
with Paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Letter Agreement and the
Company's retirement, survivor's benefits, insurance and
other applicable programs and plans, then in effect.
(3) If your employment by the Company shall be terminated (i) by
the Company other than for Cause, your death or disability,
or (ii) by you for Good Reason, you shall be entitled to the
benefits (the "Severance Payments") provided in Paragraphs
7(f)(3), (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) following, which
Severance Payments shall be in lieu of and cancel any
further rights you have to receive any Base Salary that
would be otherwise due under Paragraph 2 of this Letter
Agreement:
(i) The Company shall pay you your full Base Salary through
the date of termination at the rate in effect at the
time Notice of Termination is given;
(ii) The Company will pay as severance benefits to you, not
later than the fifth day following the date of
termination, a lump sum severance payment (the
"Severance Payment") equal to the product of (1) a
fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the lesser
of (x) twenty-four (24) or (y) the number of full and
partial months existing between the date
<PAGE> 8
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 8
of termination and your sixty-fifth (65th) birthday and
the denominator of which is equal to twelve (12), and
(2) the sum of (x) your annual Base Salary in effect
immediately prior to the occurrence of the
circumstances giving rise to such termination, and (y)
the amount, if any, of the arithmetic average of the
annual bonuses awarded to you under any annual bonus
plan of the Company calculated using the two (2) years
immediately preceding date of termination;
(iii) TheOptions previously issued to you under any
option or incentive plan of the Company to purchase
shares of Common Stock of the Company (Option Shares),
as well as any previously unvested shares of Restricted
Stock granted to you, shall irrevocably vest upon any
such termination and the stock options for such Option
Shares shall become thereafter uncancellable by the
Company;
(iv) In the event that you become entitled to the
Severance Payments, if any of the Severance Payments or
other portion of the Total Payments (as defined below)
will be subject to the tax (the "Excise Tax") imposed
by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the "Code"), the Company shall pay to you
at the time specified below, an additional amount (the
"Gross-Up Payment") such that the net amount retained
by you, after deduction of (1) any Excise Tax on the
Severance Payments and such other Total Payments, and
(2) any federal, state and local income tax,
FICA-Health Insurance tax, and Excise Tax upon the
payment provided for by this paragraph, shall be equal
to the Severance Payments and such other total
Payments. For purposes of determining whether any of
the payments will be subject to the Excise Tax and the
amount of such Excise Tax, (1) any other payments or
benefits received or to be received by you in
connection with a Change in Control of the Company or
your
<PAGE> 9
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 9
termination of employment whether pursuant to the terms
of this Letter Agreement or any other plan, arrangement
or agreement with the Company, any person whose actions
result in a Change of Control of the Company or any
person affiliated with the Company or such person
(together with the Severance Payment, the "Total
Payments") shall be treated as "parachute payments"
within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code,
and all "excess parachute payments" within the meaning
of Section 280G(b)(1) shall be treated as subject to
the Excise Tax, except to the extent that in the
opinion of tax counsel selected by the Company's
independent auditors and acceptable by you such other
payments or benefits (in whole or in part) do not
constitute parachute payments, or such excess parachute
payments (in whole or in part) represent reasonable
compensation for services actually rendered within the
meaning of Section 280G(b)(4) of the Code in excess of
the base amount within the meaning of Section
280G(b)(3) of the Code, or are otherwise not subject to
the Excise Tax, (2) the amount of the Total Payments
which shall be treated as subject to the Excise Tax
shall be equal to the lesser of (A) the total amount of
the Total Payments or (B) the amount of excess
parachute payments within the meaning of Section
280G(b)(1) (after applying clause (1), above), and (3)
the value of any non-cash benefits or any deferred
payment or benefit shall be determined by the Company's
independent auditors in accordance with the principles
of Sections 280G(d)(3) and (4) of the Code. For
purposes of determining the amount of the Gross-Up
Payment, you shall be deemed to pay federal income
taxes at the highest marginal rate of federal income
taxation in the calendar year in which the Gross-Up
Payment is to be made and state and local income taxes
at the highest marginal rate of taxation in the state
and locality of your residence on the date of
termination, net
<PAGE> 10
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 10
of the maximum reduction in federal income taxes which
could be obtained from deduction of such state and
local taxes. In the event that the Excise Tax is
subsequently determined to be less than the amount
taken into account hereunder at the time of termination
of your employment, you shall repay to the Company at
the time that the amount of such reduction in Excise
Tax is finally determined the portion of the Gross-Up
Payment attributable to such reduction (plus the
portion of the Gross-Up Payment attributable to the
Excise Tax and federal and state and local income tax
imposed on the Gross-Up Payment being repaid by you if
such repayment results in a reduction in Excise Tax
and/or a federal and state and local income tax
deduction) plus interest on the amount of such
repayment at the rate provided in Section 1274(b)(2)(B)
of the Code. In the event that the Excise Tax is
determined to exceed the amount taken into account
hereunder at the time of the termination of your
employment (including by reason of any payment the
existence or amount of which cannot be determined at
the time of the Gross-Up Payment), the Company shall
make an additional Gross-Up Payment in respect of such
excess (plus any interest payable with respect to such
excess) at the time that the amount of such excess is
finally determined.
The payments provided for in the paragraph above shall
be made not later than the fifth day following the date
of termination; provided, however, that if the amounts
of such payments cannot be finally determined on or
before such day, the Company shall pay to you on such
day an estimate as determined in good faith by the
Company of the minimum amount of such payments and
shall pay the remainder of such payments (together with
interest at the rate provided in Section 1274(b)(2)(B)
of the Code) as soon as the amount thereof can be
determined but in no event later than the thirtieth day
<PAGE> 11
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 11
after the date of termination. In the event that the
amount of the estimated payments exceeds the amount
subsequently determined to have been due, such excess
shall constitute a loan by the Company to you payable
on the fifth day after demand by the Company (together
with interest at the rate provided in Section
1274(b)(2)(B) of the Code);
(v) The Company shall also pay to you all legal fees
and expenses incurred by you as a result of such
termination of employment (including all such fees and
expenses, if any, incurred in contesting or disputing
any such termination or in seeking to obtain or enforce
any right or benefit provided by this Letter Agreement
or in connection with any tax audit or proceeding to
the extent attributable to the application of Section
4999 of the Code to any payment or benefit provided
hereunder); and
(vi) For a twenty-four (24) month period after date of
termination, the Company will arrange to provide you at
the Company's expense with life, disability, accident
and health insurance benefits substantially similar to
those which you were receiving immediately prior to the
Notice of Termination; but benefits otherwise
receivable by you pursuant to this paragraph shall be
reduced to the extent comparable benefits are actually
received by you during the twenty-four (24) month
period following your termination, and any such
benefits actually received by you shall be reported to
the Company.
(h) You shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any Severance
Payments provided for in this Paragraph 7 by seeking other
employment or otherwise, nor, except as provided in Paragraph
(vi) above, shall the amount of any payment or benefit provided
for in this Paragraph 7 be reduced by any compensation or benefit
earned by you as the result of employment by another employer
after the date of termination, or otherwise.
<PAGE> 12
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 12
(i) The Company will require any successor (whether direct or
indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise)
to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of
the Company or of any division or subsidiary thereof
employing you to expressly assume and agree to perform this
Letter Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent
that the Company would be required to perform it if no such
succession had taken place. Failure of the Company to obtain
such assumption and agreement prior to the effectiveness of
any such succession shall be a breach of this Letter
Agreement and shall entitle you to compensation from the
Company in the same amount and on the same terms as you
would be entitled hereunder if you terminate your employment
for Good Reason.
8. This Letter Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable
by your personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators,
successors, heirs, distributees, devisees and legatees. If you should
die while any amount would still be payable to you hereunder if you
had continued to live, all such amounts, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall be paid in accordance with the terms of this Letter
Agreement, to your devisee, legatee or other designee or, if there is
not such designee, to your estate.
9. As additional consideration for the compensation and benefits provided
to you pursuant to this Letter Agreement, you agree that you will not,
for a period of twenty-four (24) months after the end of the
Employment Period, or the termination of your employment with the
Company (whichever first occurs), directly or indirectly, compete
with, engage in the same business as, be employed by, act a consultant
to, or be a director, officer, employee, owner or partner, or
otherwise participate in or assist (including, without limitation, by
soliciting customers for, or individuals to provide services to), any
business or organization which competes with the Company; provided,
that this restriction shall not apply if you terminate your employment
with the Company for Good Reason after a Change in Control of the
Company. For purposes of this Paragraph 9, you will not be deemed to
have breached your commitment merely because you own, directly or
indirectly, not more than one percent (1%) of the outstanding common
stock of such a corporation if, at the time you acquire such stock,
such stock is listed on a national securities exchange or is regularly
traded in the over-the-counter market by a member of either a
<PAGE> 13
Ms. Dawne S. Hickton
May 1, 1997
Page 13
national securities exchange or the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. In order to protect the interest of the Company, you
will also maintain in strict confidence and not disclose to any other
person or entity any information received from any source in the
Company or developed by you in the course of performing your duties
for the Company. This obligation shall not extend to: (a) anything you
can establish as known to you from a source outside the Company, (b)
anything which has been published or becomes published hereafter other
than by you, or (c) anything which you receive from a non-Company
source without restriction on its disclosure. Should you breach or
threaten to breach the commitments in this Paragraph 9, and in
recognition of the fact that the Company would not under such
circumstances be adequately compensated by money damages, the Company
shall be entitled, in addition to any other rights and remedies
available to it, to an injunction restraining you from such breach.
Further, you acknowledge and agree that the provisions of this
Paragraph 9 are necessary, reasonable, and proportionate to protect
the Company during such non-competition period.
10. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this
Letter Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Ohio.
If the provisions of this Letter Agreement are acceptable to you, please sign
one original copy of this Letter Agreement and return it to me. You may retain
the second signed original for your files.
Very truly yours,
RMI TITANIUM COMPANY
By:
-------------------------------
TIMOTHY G. RUPERT
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
CONFIRMED:
DATE:
- ------------------------------- --------------------------
DAWNE S. HICKTON
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION> OTHER NAME, IP ANY,
STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION THAT THE SUBSIDIARY
NAME OF INCORPORATION DOES BUSINESS UNDER
<S> <C> <C>
RMI Metals, Inc. Utah Micron Metals, Inc.
TRADCO, Inc. Missouri
Galt Alloys, Inc. Ohio
RMI Titanium International, Inc. Barbados
RMI Titanium Coiled Tubing, Inc. Texas
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 listed below of RMI
Titanium Company of our report dated January 23, 1998, appearing on page 23 of
this annual report on Form 10-K.
File No. 33-36248 Relating to the RMI 1989 Stock Option Incentive Plan
File No. 33-38340 Relating to the RMI Bargaining Unit Employees Savings and
Investment Plan
File No. 33-38339 Relating to the RMI Savings and Investment Plan
File No. 33-63025 Relating to the RMI Titanium Company 1995 Stock Plan
Price Waterhouse LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 27, 1998
<PAGE> 1
Exhibit 24
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
February 27, 1998 /s/ CRAIG R. ANDERSSON
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Craig R. Andersson
<PAGE> 2
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
February 27, 1998 /s/ NEIL A. ARMSTRONG
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Neil A. Armstrong
<PAGE> 3
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
March 3, 1998 /s/ DANIEL I. BOOKER
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Daniel I. Booker
<PAGE> 4
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
March 2, 1998 /s/ RONALD L. GALLATIN
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Ronald L. Gallatin
<PAGE> 5
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
March 2, 1998 /s/ CHARLES C. GEDEON
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Charles C. Gedeon
<PAGE> 6
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
February 27, 1998 /s/ ROBERT M. HERNANDEZ
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Robert M. Hernandez
<PAGE> 7
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
February 27, 1998 /s/ DANA J. JOHNSON
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Dana J. Johnson
<PAGE> 8
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
February 26, 1998 /s/ JOHN H. OLDE
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) John H. Olde
<PAGE> 9
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
February 25, 1998 /s/ TIMOTHY G. RUPERT
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Timothy G. Rupert
<PAGE> 10
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That, the undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint, Timothy G.
Rupert or John H. Odle, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to sign and execute
for me and on my behalf, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1997 for
RMI Titanium Company, and any and all amendments thereto to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, as
amended, in such form as they or any one or more of them may approve, and to do
any and all other acts which said attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or
desirable to enable RMI Titanium Company to comply with said Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.
March 3, 1998 /s/ WESLEY W. VON SCHACK
- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Date) Wesley W. von Schack
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854663
<NAME> RMI TITANIUM
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997
<CASH> 30,211
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 71,962
<ALLOWANCES> 1,064
<INVENTORY> 120,732
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 232,555
<PP&E> 148,193
<DEPRECIATION> 105,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 291,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 47,731
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 210
<OTHER-SE> 220,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 291,309
<SALES> 318,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 318,530
<CGS> 245,687
<TOTAL-COSTS> 261,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (1,246)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 240
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 244
<INCOME-PRETAX> 57,317
<INCOME-TAX> (2,768)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 60,085
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 60,085
<EPS-PRIMARY> 2.94
<EPS-DILUTED> 2.92
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854663
<NAME> RMI TITANIUM
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 5,944
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 58,681
<ALLOWANCES> 979
<INVENTORY> 92,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 163,200
<PP&E> 136,404
<DEPRECIATION> 98,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 215,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 31,064
<BONDS> 3,600
0
0
<COMMON> 208
<OTHER-SE> 158,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 215,880
<SALES> 251,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 251,357
<CGS> 205,748
<TOTAL-COSTS> 217,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 110
<LOSS-PROVISION> 280
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 2,181
<INCOME-PRETAX> 31,659
<INCOME-TAX> (100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 31,759
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 31,579
<EPS-PRIMARY> 1.71
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.70
</TABLE>
