GENERAL CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, INC.
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
This Statement of Additional Information, which is not a prospectus,
supplements and should be read in conjunction with the current Prospectus of
General California Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"), dated February 1,
2000, as it may be revised from time to time. To obtain a copy of the Fund's
Prospectus, please write to the Fund at 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale,
New York 11556-0144, or call toll free 1-800-645-6561.
The Fund's most recent Annual Report and Semi-Annual Report to
Shareholders are separate documents supplied with this Statement of Additional
Information, and the financial statements, accompanying notes and report of
independent auditors appearing in the Annual Report are incorporated by
reference into this Statement of Additional Information.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Description of the Fund....................................B-2
Management of the Fund....................................B-16
Management Arrangements...................................B-20
How to Buy Shares.........................................B-23
Service Plan..............................................B-25
Shareholder Services Plan.................................B-26
How to Redeem Shares......................................B-27
Shareholder Services......................................B-30
Determination of Net Asset Value..........................B-33
Dividends, Distributions and Taxes........................B-33
Portfolio Transactions....................................B-36
Performance Information...................................B-37
Information About the Fund................................B-38
Counsel and Independent Auditors..........................B-40
Appendix A................................................B-41
Appendix B................................................B-61
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF THE FUND
The Fund is a Maryland corporation formed on August 18, 1989. The Fund is
an open-end management investment company, known as a municipal bond fund.
The Dreyfus Corporation (the "Manager") serves as the Fund's investment
adviser.
Premier Mutual Fund Services, Inc. (the "Distributor") is the
distributor of the Fund's shares.
Certain Portfolio Securities
The following information supplements and should be read in conjunction
with the Fund's Prospectus.
Municipal Obligations. The Fund will invest primarily in the debt
securities of the State of California, its political subdivisions, authorities
and corporations, the interest from which is, in the opinion of bond counsel to
the issuer, exempt from Federal and State of California personal income taxes
(collectively, "California Municipal Obligations"). To the extent acceptable,
California Municipal Obligations are at any time unavailable for investment by
the Fund, the Fund will invest temporarily in other securities the interest from
which is, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, exempt from Federal, but
not State of California income tax. The Fund will invest at least 80% of the
value of its net assets (except when maintaining a temporary defensive position)
in Municipal Obligations. Municipal Obligations are debt obligations issued by
states, territories and possessions of the United States and the District of
Columbia and their political subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities, or
multistate agencies or authorities, the interest from which, in the opinion of
bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from Federal income tax. Municipal
Obligations generally include debt obligations issued to obtain funds for
various public purposes as well as certain industrial development bonds issued
by or on behalf of public authorities. Municipal Obligations are classified as
general obligation bonds, revenue bonds and notes. General obligation bonds are
secured by the issuer's pledge of its faith, credit and taxing power for the
payment of principal and interest. Revenue bonds are payable from the revenue
derived from a particular facility or class of facilities or, in some cases,
from the proceeds of a special excise or other specific revenue source, but not
from the general taxing power. Tax exempt industrial development bonds, in most
cases, are revenue bonds that do not carry the pledge of the credit of the
issuing municipality, but generally are guaranteed by the corporate entity on
whose behalf they are issued. Notes are short-term instruments which are
obligations of the issuing municipalities or agencies and are sold in
anticipation of a bond sale, collection of taxes or receipt of other revenues.
Municipal Obligations include municipal lease/purchase agreements which are
similar to installment purchase contracts for property or equipment issued by
municipalities. Municipal Obligations bear fixed, floating or variable rates of
interest, which are determined in some instances by formulas under which the
Municipal Obligation's interest rate will change directly or inversely to
changes in interest rates or an index, or multiples thereof, in many cases
subject to a maximum and minimum. Certain Municipal Obligations are subject to
redemption at a date earlier than their stated maturity pursuant to call
options, which may be separated from the related Municipal Obligation and
purchased and sold separately.
The yields on Municipal Obligations are dependent on a variety of factors,
including general economic and monetary conditions, money market factors,
conditions in the Municipal Obligations market, size of a particular offering,
maturity of the obligation and rating of the issue.
Certain Tax Exempt Obligations. The Fund may purchase floating and variable rate
demand notes and bonds, which are tax exempt obligations ordinarily having
stated maturities in excess of one year, but which permit the holder to demand
payment of principal at any time or at specified intervals. Variable rate demand
notes include master demand notes which are obligations that permit the Fund to
invest fluctuating amounts, at varying rates of interest, pursuant to direct
arrangements between the Fund, as lender, and the borrower. These obligations
permit daily changes in the amount borrowed. Because these obligations are
direct lending arrangements between the lender and borrower, it is not
contemplated that such instruments generally will be traded, and there generally
is no established secondary market for these obligations, although they are
redeemable at face value, plus accrued interest. Accordingly, where these
obligations are not secured by letters of credit or other credit support
arrangements, the Fund's right to redeem is dependent on the ability of the
borrower to pay principal and interest on demand. Each obligation purchased by
the Fund will meet the quality criteria established for the purchase of
Municipal Obligations.
Tax Exempt Participation Interests. The Fund may purchase from financial
institutions participation interests in Municipal Obligations (such as
industrial development bonds and municipal lease/purchase agreements). A
participation interest gives the Fund an undivided interest in the Municipal
Obligation in the proportion that the Fund's participation interest bears to the
total principal amount of the Municipal Obligation. These instruments may have
fixed, floating or variable rates of interest. If the participation interest is
unrated, it will be backed by an irrevocable letter of credit or guarantee of a
bank that the Fund's Board has determined meets prescribed quality standards for
banks, or the payment obligation otherwise will be collateralized by U.S.
Government securities. For certain participation interests, the Fund will have
the right to demand payment, on not more than seven days' notice, for all or any
part of the Fund's participation interest in the Municipal Obligation, plus
accrued interest. As to these instruments, the Fund intends to exercise its
right to demand payment only upon a default under the terms of the Municipal
Obligation, as needed to provide liquidity to meet redemptions, or to maintain
or improve the quality of its investment portfolio.
Municipal lease obligations or installment purchase contract obligations
(collectively, "lease obligations") have special risks not ordinarily associated
with Municipal Obligations. Although lease obligations do not constitute general
obligations of the municipality for which the municipality's taxing power is
pledged, a lease obligation ordinarily is backed by the municipality's covenant
to budget for, appropriate and make the payments due under the lease obligation.
However certain lease obligations contain "non-appropriation" clauses which
provide that the municipality has no obligation to make lease or installment
purchase payments in future years unless money is appropriated for such purpose
on a yearly basis. Although, "non-appropriation" lease obligations are secured
by the leased property, disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure
might prove difficult. The staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
currently considers certain lease obligations to be illiquid. Determination as
to the liquidity of such securities is made in accordance with guidelines
established by the Fund's Board. Pursuant to such guidelines, the Board has
directed the Manager to monitor carefully the Fund's investment in such
securities with particular regard to (1) the frequency of trades and quotes for
the lease obligation; (2) the number of dealers willing to purchase or sell the
lease obligation and the number of the potential buyers; (3) the willingness of
dealers to undertake to make a market in the lease obligation; (4) the nature of
the marketplace trades including the time needed to dispose of the lease
obligation, the method of soliciting offers and the mechanics of transfer; and
(5) such other factors concerning the trading market for the lease obligation as
the Manager may deem relevant. In addition, in evaluating the liquidity and
credit quality of a lease obligation that is unrated, the Fund's Board has
directed the Manager to consider (a) whether the lease can be canceled; (b) what
assurance there is that the assets represented by the lease can be sold; (c) the
strength of the lessee's general credit (e.g., its debt, administrative,
economic, and financial characteristics); (d) the likelihood that the
municipality will discontinue appropriating funding for the leased property
because the property is no longer deemed essential to the operations of the
municipality (e.g., the potential for an "event of nonappropriation"); (e) the
legal recourse in the event of failure to appropriate; and (f) such other
factors concerning credit quality as the Manager may deem relevant.
Tender Option Bonds. The Fund may purchase tender option bonds. A tender option
bond is a Municipal Obligation (generally held pursuant to a custodial
arrangement) having a relatively long maturity and bearing interest at a fixed
rate substantially higher than prevailing short-term tax exempt rates, that has
been coupled with the agreement of a third party, such as a bank, broker-dealer
or other financial institution, pursuant to which such institution grants the
security holders the option, at periodic intervals, to tender their securities
to the institution and receive the face value thereof. As consideration for
providing the option, the financial institution receives periodic fees equal to
the difference between the Municipal Obligation's fixed coupon rate and the
rate, as determined by a remarketing or similar agent at or near the
commencement of such period, that would cause the securities, coupled with the
tender option, to trade at par on the date of such determination. Thus, after
payment of this fee, the security holder effectively holds a demand obligation
that bears interest at the prevailing short-term tax exempt rate. The Manager,
on behalf of the Fund, will consider on an ongoing basis the creditworthiness of
the issuer of the underlying Municipal Obligation, of any custodian and of the
third party provider of the tender option. In certain instances and for certain
tender option bonds, the option may be terminable in the event of a default in
payment of principal or interest on the underlying Municipal Obligation and for
other reasons.
The Fund will purchase tender option bonds only when it is satisfied that
the custodial and tender option arrangements, including the fee payment
arrangements, will not adversely affect the tax exempt status of the underlying
Municipal Obligations and that payment of any tender fees will not have the
effect of creating taxable income for the Fund. Based on the tender option bond
agreement, the Fund expects to be able to value the tender option bond at par;
however, the value of the instrument will be monitored to assure that it is
valued at fair value.
Custodial Receipts. The Fund may purchase custodial receipts representing the
right to receive certain future principal and interest payments on Municipal
Obligations which underlie the custodial receipts. A number of different
arrangements are possible. In a typical custodial receipt arrangement, an issuer
or a third party owner of Municipal Obligations deposits such obligations with a
custodian in exchange for two classes of custodial receipts. The two classes
have different characteristics, but, in each case, payments on the two classes
are based on payments received on the underlying Municipal Obligations. One
class has the characteristics of a typical auction rate security, where at
specified intervals its interest rate is adjusted, and ownership changes, based
on an auction mechanism. This class's interest rate generally is expected to be
below the coupon rate of the underlying Municipal Obligations and generally is
at a level comparable to that of a Municipal Obligation of similar quality and
having a maturity equal to the period between interest rate adjustments. The
second class bears interest at a rate that exceeds the interest rate typically
borne by a security of comparable quality and maturity; this rate also is
adjusted, but in this case inversely to changes in the rate of interest of the
first class. In no event will the aggregate interest paid with respect to the
two classes exceed the interest paid by the underlying Municipal Obligations.
The value of the second class and similar securities should be expected to
fluctuate more than the value of a Municipal Obligation of comparable quality
and maturity and their purchase by the Fund should increase the volatility of
its net asset value and, thus, its price per share. These custodial receipts are
sold in private placements. The Fund also may purchase directly from issuers,
and not in a private placement, Municipal Obligations having characteristics
similar to custodial receipts. These securities may be issued as part of a
multi-class offering and the interest rate on certain classes may be subject to
a cap or floor.
Stand-By Commitments. The Fund may acquire "stand-by commitments" with respect
to Municipal Obligations held in its portfolio. Under a stand-by commitment, the
Fund obligates a broker, dealer or bank to repurchase, at the Fund's option,
specified securities at a specified price and, in this respect, stand-by
commitments are comparable to put options. The exercise of a stand-by
commitment, therefore, is subject to the ability of the seller to make payment
on demand. The Fund will acquire stand-by commitments solely to facilitate its
portfolio liquidity and does not intend to exercise its rights thereunder for
trading purposes. The Fund may pay for stand-by commitments if such action is
deemed necessary, thus increasing to a degree the cost of the underlying
Municipal Obligation and similarly decreasing such security's yield to
investors. Gains realized in connection with stand-by commitments will be
taxable. The Fund also may acquire call options on specific Municipal
Obligations. The Fund generally would purchase these call options to protect the
Fund from the issuer of the related Municipal Obligation redeeming, or other
holder of the call option from calling away, the Municipal Obligation before
maturity. The sale by the Fund of a call option that it owns on a specific
Municipal Obligation could result in the receipt of taxable income by the Fund.
Ratings of Municipal Obligations. The Fund will invest at least 65% of the value
of its net assets in Municipal Obligations which, in the case of bonds, are
rated no lower than Baa by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") or BBB by
Standard & Poor's Ratings Group ("S&P") or Fitch IBCA, Inc. ("Fitch" and,
collectively with Moody's and S&P, the "Rating Agencies"). The Fund may invest
up to 35% of the value of its net assets in Municipal Obligations which, in the
case of bonds, are rated lower than Baa by Moody's and BBB by S&P and Fitch and
as low as the lowest rating assigned by a Rating Agency. The Fund also may
invest in securities which, while not rated, are determined by the Manager to be
of comparable quality to the rated securities in which the Fund may invest; for
purposes of the 65% requirement described in this paragraph, such unrated
securities will be considered to have the rating so determined.
The average distribution of investments (at value) in Municipal
Obligations (including notes) by ratings for the fiscal year ended September 30,
1999, computed on a monthly basis, was as follows:
Percentage of
Fitch or Moody's or S&P Value
AAA Aaa AAA 41.0%
AA Aa AA 8.1%
A A A 21.4%
BBB Baa BBB 22.0%
BB Ba BB .6%
F-1+/F-1 VMIG1/MIG1, P-1 SP-1+/SP-1, A-1 .9%
Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated 6.0%*
------
100.0%
Subsequent to its purchase by the Fund, an issue of rated Municipal
Obligations may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below the minimum
required for purchase by the Fund. Neither event will require the sale of such
Municipal Obligations by the Fund, but the Manager will consider such event in
determining whether the Fund should continue to hold the Municipal Obligations.
To the extent that the ratings given by a Rating Agency for Municipal
Obligations may change as a result of changes in such organization or its rating
system, the Fund will attempt to use comparable ratings as standards for its
investments in accordance with the investment policies contained in the
Prospectus and this Statement of Additional Information. The ratings of the
Rating Agencies represent their opinions as to the quality of the Municipal
Obligations which they undertake to rate. It should be emphasized, however, that
ratings are relative and subjective and are not absolute standards of quality.
Although these ratings may be an initial criterion for selection of portfolio
investments, the Manager also will evaluate these securities and the
creditworthiness of the issuers of such securities.
* Included in the Not Rated category are securities comprising 6.0% of the
Fund's market value which, while not rated, have been determined by the
Manager to be of comparable quality to securities in the following rating
categories: Aaa/AAA (3.5%), A/A (.1%), Baa/BBB (1.7%) and Ba/BB (.7%).
Taxable Investments. From time to time, on a temporary basis other than
for temporary defensive purposes (but not to exceed 20% of the value of the
Fund's net assets) or for temporary defensive purposes, the Fund may invest in
taxable short-term investments ("Taxable Investments") consisting of: notes of
issuers having, at the time of purchase, a quality rating within the two highest
grades of a Rating Agency; obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies or
instrumentalities; commercial paper rated not lower than P-2 by Moody's, A-2 by
S&P or F-2 by Fitch; certificates of deposit of U.S. domestic banks, including
foreign branches of domestic banks, with assets of $1 billion or more; time
deposits; bankers' acceptances and other short-term bank obligations; and
repurchase agreements in respect of any of the foregoing. Dividends paid by the
Fund that are attributable to income earned by the Fund from Taxable Investments
will be taxable to investors. See "Dividends, Distributions and Taxes". Except
for temporary defensive purposes, at no time will more than 20% of the value of
the Fund's net assets be invested in Taxable Investments. When the Fund has
adopted a temporary defensive position, including when acceptable California
Municipal Obligations are unavailable for investment by the Fund, in excess of
35% of the Fund's net assets may be invested in securities that are not exempt
from California personal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund
anticipates that not more than 5% of the value of its total assets will be
invested in any one category of Taxable Investments.
Zero Coupon Securities. The Fund may invest in zero coupon securities
which are debt securities issued or sold at a discount from their face value
which do not entitle the holder to any periodic payment of interest prior to
maturity or a specified redemption date (or cash payment date) and pay-in-kind
bonds (bonds which pay interest through the issuance of additional bonds). The
amount of the discount varies depending on the time remaining until maturity or
cash payment date, prevailing interest rates, liquidity of the security and
perceived credit quality of the issuer. Zero coupon securities also may take the
form of debt securities that have been stripped of their unmatured interest
coupons, the coupons themselves and receipts or certificates representing
interest in such stripped debt obligations and coupons. The market prices of
zero coupon securities generally are more volatile than the market prices of
securities that pay interest periodically and are likely to respond to a greater
degree to changes in interest rates than non-zero coupon securities having
similar maturities and credit qualities. Federal income tax law requires the
holder of a zero coupon security or of certain pay-in-kind bonds to accrue
income with respect to these securities prior to the receipt of cash payments.
To maintain its qualification as a regulated investment company and avoid
liability for Federal income taxes, the Fund may be required to distribute such
income accrued with respect to these securities and may have to dispose of
portfolio securities under disadvantageous circumstances in order to generate
cash to satisfy these distribution requirements.
Illiquid Securities. The Fund may invest up to 15% of the value of its net
assets in securities as to which a liquid trading market does not exist,
provided such investments are consistent with the Fund's investment objective.
These securities may include securities that are not readily marketable, such as
securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale, and
repurchase agreements providing for settlement in more than seven days after
notice. As to these securities, the Fund is subject to a risk that should the
Fund desire to sell them when a ready buyer is not available at a price that the
Fund deems representative of their value, the value of the Fund's net assets
could be adversely affected.
Investment Techniques
The following information supplements and should be read in conjunction
with the Fund's Prospectus. The Fund's use of certain of the investment
techniques described below may give rise to taxable income.
Derivatives. The Fund may invest in, or enter into, derivatives, such as
options and futures, for a variety of reasons, including to hedge certain market
risks, to provide a substitute for purchasing or selling particular securities
or to increase potential income gain. Derivatives may provide a cheaper, quicker
or more specifically focused way for the Fund to invest than "traditional"
securities would.
Derivatives can be volatile and involve various types and degrees of risk,
depending upon the characteristics of the particular derivative and the
portfolio as a whole. Derivatives permit the Fund to increase or decrease the
level of risk, or change the character of the risk, to which its portfolio is
exposed in much the same way as the Fund can increase or decrease the level of
risk, or change the character of the risk, of its portfolio by making
investments in specific securities.
However, derivatives may entail investment exposures that are greater than
their cost would suggest, meaning that a small investment in derivatives could
have a large potential impact on the Fund's performance.
If the Fund invests in derivatives at inopportune times or judges market
conditions incorrectly, such investments may lower the Fund's return or result
in a loss. The Fund also could experience losses if its derivatives were poorly
correlated with its other investments, or if the Fund were unable to liquidate
its position because of an illiquid secondary market. The market for many
derivatives is, or suddenly can become, illiquid. Changes in liquidity may
result in significant, rapid and unpredictable changes in the prices for
derivatives.
Although the Fund will not be a commodity pool, certain derivatives
subject the Fund to the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission which
limit the extent to which the Fund can invest in such derivatives. The Fund may
invest in futures contracts and options with respect thereto for hedging
purposes without limit. However, the Fund may not invest in such contracts and
options for other purposes if the sum of the amount of initial margin deposits
and premiums paid for unexpired options with respect to such contracts, other
than for bona fide hedging purposes, exceeds 5% of the liquidation value of the
Fund's assets, after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized
losses on such contracts and options; provided, however, that in the case of an
option that is in-the-money at the time of purchase, the in-the-money amount may
be excluded in calculating the 5% limitation.
Derivatives may be purchased on established exchanges or through privately
negotiated transactions referred to as over-the-counter derivatives.
Exchange-traded derivatives generally are guaranteed by the clearing agency
which is the issuer or counterparty to such derivatives. This guarantee usually
is supported by a daily variation margin system operated by the clearing agency
in order to reduce overall credit risk. As a result, unless the clearing agency
defaults, there is relatively little counterparty credit risk associated with
derivatives purchased on an exchange. By contrast, no clearing agency guarantees
over-the-counter derivatives. Therefore, each party to an over-the-counter
derivative bears the risk that the counterparty will default. Accordingly, the
Manager will consider the creditworthiness of counterparties to over-the-counter
derivatives in the same manner as it would review the credit quality of a
security to be purchased by the Fund. Over-the-counter derivatives are less
liquid than exchange-traded derivatives since the other party to the transaction
may be the only investor with sufficient understanding of the derivative to be
interested in bidding for it.
Futures Transactions--In General. The Fund may enter into futures contracts in
U.S. domestic markets. Engaging in these transactions involves risk of loss to
the Fund which could adversely affect the value of the Fund's net assets.
Although the Fund intends to purchase or sell futures contracts only if there is
an active market for such contracts, no assurance can be given that a liquid
market will exist for any particular contract at any particular time. Many
futures exchanges and boards of trade limit the amount of fluctuation permitted
in futures contract prices during a single trading day. Once the daily limit has
been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made that day at a price
beyond that limit or trading may be suspended for specified periods during the
trading day. Futures contract prices could move to the limit for several
consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing prompt
liquidation of futures positions and potentially subjecting the Fund to
substantial losses.
Successful use of futures by the Fund also is subject to the Manager's
ability to predict correctly movements in the direction of the relevant market
and, to the extent the transaction is entered into for hedging purposes, to
ascertain the appropriate correlation between the securities being hedged and
the price movements of the futures contract. For example, if the Fund uses
futures to hedge against the possibility of a decline in the market value of
securities held in its portfolio and the prices of such securities instead
increase, the Fund will lose part or all of the benefit of the increased value
of securities which it has hedged because it will have offsetting losses in its
futures positions. Furthermore, if in such circumstances the Fund has
insufficient cash, it may have to sell securities to meet daily variation margin
requirements. The Fund may have to sell such securities at a time when it may be
disadvantageous to do so.
Pursuant to regulations and/or published positions of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Fund may be required to segregate permissible liquid
assets to cover its obligations relating to its transactions in derivatives. To
maintain this required cover, the Fund may have to sell portfolio securities at
disadvantageous prices or times since it may not be possible to liquidate a
derivative position at a reasonable price. In addition, the segregation of such
assets will have the effect of limiting the Fund's ability otherwise to invest
those assets.
Specific Futures Transactions. The Fund may purchase and sell interest rate
futures contracts. An interest rate future obligates the Fund to purchase or
sell an amount of a specific debt security at a future date at a specific price.
Options--In General. The Fund may invest up to 5% of its assets, represented by
the premium paid, in the purchase of call and put options. The Fund may write
(i.e., sell) covered call and put option contracts to the extent of 20% of the
value of its net assets at the time such option contracts are written. A call
option gives the purchaser of the option the right to buy, and obligates the
writer to sell, the underlying security or securities at the exercise price at
any time during the option period, or at a specific date. Conversely, a put
option gives the purchaser of the option the right to sell, and obligates the
writer to buy, the underlying security or securities at the exercise price at
any time during the option period, or at a specific date.
A covered call option written by the Fund is a call option with respect to
which the Fund owns the underlying security or otherwise covers the transaction
by segregating permissible liquid assets. A put option written by the Fund is
covered when, among other things, the Fund segregates permissible liquid assets
having a value equal to or greater than the exercise price of the option to
fulfill the obligation undertaken. The principal reason for writing covered call
and put options is to realize, through the receipt of premiums, a greater return
than would be realized on the underlying securities alone. The Fund receives a
premium from writing covered call or put options which it retains whether or not
the option is exercised.
There is no assurance that sufficient trading interest to create a liquid
secondary market on a securities exchange will exist for any particular option
or at any particular time, and for some options no such secondary market may
exist. A liquid secondary market in an option may cease to exist for a variety
of reasons. In the past, for example, higher than anticipated trading activity
or order flow, or other unforeseen events, at times have rendered certain of the
clearing facilities inadequate and resulted in the institution of special
procedures, such as trading rotations, restrictions on certain types of orders
or trading halts or suspensions in one or more options. There can be no
assurance that similar events, or events that may otherwise interfere with the
timely execution of customers' orders, will not recur. In such event, it might
not be possible to effect closing transactions in particular options. If, as a
covered call option writer, the Fund is unable to effect a closing purchase
transaction in a secondary market, it will not be able to sell the underlying
security until the option expires or it delivers the underlying security upon
exercise or it otherwise covers its position.
Successful use by the Fund of options will be subject to the Manager's
ability to predict correctly movements in interest rates. To the extent the
Manager's predictions are incorrect, the Fund may incur losses.
Future Developments. The Fund may take advantage of opportunities in the
area of options and futures contracts and options on futures contracts and any
other derivatives which are not presently contemplated for use by the Fund or
which are not currently available but which may be developed, to the extent such
opportunities are both consistent with the Fund's investment objective and
legally permissible for the Fund. Before entering into such transactions or
making any such investment, the Fund will provide appropriate disclosure in its
Prospectus or this Statement of Additional Information.
Lending Portfolio Securities. The Fund may lend securities from its
portfolio to brokers, dealers and other financial institutions needing to borrow
securities to complete certain transactions. The Fund continues to be entitled
to payments in amounts equal to the interest or other distributions payable on
the loaned securities which affords the Fund an opportunity to earn interest on
the amount of the loan and on the loaned securities' collateral. Loans of
portfolio securities may not exceed 33-1/3% of the value of the Fund's total
assets, and the Fund will receive collateral consisting of cash, U.S. Government
securities or irrevocable letters of credit which will be maintained at all
times in an amount equal to at least 100% of the current market value of the
loaned securities. Such loans are terminable by the Fund at any time upon
specified notice. The Fund might experience risk of loss if the institution with
which it has engaged in a portfolio loan transaction breaches its agreement with
the Fund. In connection with its securities lending transactions, the Fund may
return to the borrower or a third party which is unaffiliated with the Fund, and
which is acting as a "placing broker", a part of the interest earned from the
investment of collateral received for securities loaned.
Borrowing Money. The Fund is permitted to borrow to the extent permitted
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), which
permits an investment company to borrow in an amount up to 33-1/3% of the value
of its total assets. The Fund currently intends to borrow money only for
temporary or emergency (not leveraging) purposes, in an amount up to 15% of the
value of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) valued at the lesser
of cost or market, less liabilities (not including the amount borrowed) at the
time the borrowing is made. While such borrowings exceed 5% of the Fund's total
assets, the Fund will not make any additional investments.
Forward Commitments. The Fund may purchase Municipal Obligations and other
securities on a forward commitment or when-issued basis, which means that
delivery and payment take place a number of days after the date of the
commitment to purchase. The payment obligation and the interest rate receivable
on a forward commitment or when-issued security are fixed when the Fund enters
into the commitment, but the Fund does not make payment until it receives
delivery from the counterparty. The Fund will commit to purchase such securities
only with the intention of actually acquiring the securities, but the Fund may
sell these securities before the settlement date if it is deemed advisable. The
Fund will segregate permissible liquid assets at least equal at all times to the
amount of the Fund's purchase commitments.
Municipal Obligations and other securities purchased on a forward
commitment or when-issued basis are subject to changes in value (generally
changing in the same way, i.e. appreciating when interest rates decline and
depreciating when interest rates rise) based upon the public's perception of the
creditworthiness of the issuer and changes, real or anticipated, in the level of
interest rates. Securities purchased on a when-issued basis may expose the Fund
to risks because they may experience such fluctuations prior to their actual
delivery. Purchasing securities on a forward commitment or when-issued basis can
involve the additional risk that the yield available in the market when the
delivery takes place actually may be higher than that obtained in the
transaction itself. Purchasing securities on a when-issued basis when the Fund
is fully or almost fully invested may result in greater potential fluctuation in
the value of the Fund's net assets and its net asset value per share.
Investment Considerations and Risks
Investing in Municipal Obligations. The Fund may invest more than 25% of
the value of its total assets in Municipal Obligations which are related in such
a way that an economic, business or political development or change affecting
one such security also would affect the other securities; for example,
securities the interest upon which is paid from revenues of similar types of
projects. As a result, the Fund may be subject to greater risk as compared to a
fund that does not follow this practice.
Certain municipal lease/purchase obligations in which the Fund may invest
may contain "non-appropriation" clauses which provide that the municipality has
no obligation to make lease payments in future years unless money is
appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis. Although "non-appropriation"
lease/purchase obligations are secured by the leased property, disposition of
the leased property in the event of foreclosure might prove difficult. In
evaluating the credit quality of a municipal lease/purchase obligation that is
unrated, the Manager will consider, on an ongoing basis, a number of factors
including the likelihood that the issuing municipality will discontinue
appropriating funding for the leased property.
Certain provisions in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), relating to the issuance of Municipal Obligations may reduce the volume
of Municipal Obligations qualifying for Federal tax exemption. One effect of
these provisions could be to increase the cost of the Municipal Obligations
available for purchase by the Fund and thus reduce available yield. Shareholders
should consult their tax advisers concerning the effect of these provisions on
an investment in the Fund. Proposals that may restrict or eliminate the income
tax exemption for interest on Municipal Obligations may be introduced in the
future. If any such proposal were enacted that would reduce the availability of
Municipal Obligations for investment by the Fund so as to adversely affect Fund
shareholders, the Fund would reevaluate its investment objective and policies
and submit possible changes in the Fund's structure to shareholders for their
consideration. If legislation were enacted that would treat a type of Municipal
Obligation as taxable, the Fund would treat such security as a permissible
Taxable Investment within the applicable limits set forth herein.
Investing in California Municipal Obligations. Since the Fund is
concentrated in securities issued by California or entities within California,
an investment in the Fund may involve greater risk than investments in certain
other types of bond funds. You should consider carefully the special risks
inherent in the Fund's investment in California Municipal Obligations. You
should review "Appendix A" which more fully sets forth these and other risk
factors.
Lower Rated Bonds. The Fund may invest up to 35% of the value of its net
assets in higher yielding (and, therefore, higher risk) debt securities such as
those rated below investment grade by the Rating Agencies (commonly known as
junk bonds). They may be subject to greater risks and market fluctuations than
certain lower yielding, higher rated Municipal Obligations. See "Appendix B" for
a general description of the Rating Agencies' ratings of Municipal Obligations.
Although ratings may be useful in evaluating the safety of interest and
principal payments, they do not evaluate the market value risk of these bonds.
The Fund will rely on the Manager's judgment, analysis and experience in
evaluating the creditworthiness of an issuer.
You should be aware that the market values of many of these bonds tend to
be more sensitive to economic conditions than are higher rated securities and
will fluctuate over time. These bonds generally are considered by the Rating
Agencies to be, on balance, predominantly speculative with respect to capacity
to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the
obligation and generally will involve more credit risk than securities in the
higher rating categories.
Because there is no established retail secondary market for many of these
securities, the Fund anticipates that such securities could be sold only to a
limited number of dealers or institutional investors. To the extent a secondary
trading market for these bonds does exist, it generally is not as liquid as the
secondary market for higher rated securities. The lack of a liquid secondary
market may have an adverse impact on market price and yield and the Fund's
ability to dispose of particular issues when necessary to meet the Fund's
liquidity needs or in response to a specific economic event such as a
deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuer. The lack of a liquid
secondary market for certain securities also may make it more difficult for the
Fund to obtain accurate market quotations for purposes of valuing the Fund's
portfolio and calculating its net asset value. Adverse publicity and investor
perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may decrease the
values and liquidity of these securities. In such cases, the Manager's judgment
may play a greater role in valuation.
These bonds may be particularly susceptible to economic downturns. It is
likely that any economic recession could disrupt severely the market for such
securities and may have an adverse impact on the value of such securities. In
addition, it is likely that any such economic downturn could adversely affect
the ability of the issuers of such securities to repay principal and pay
interest thereon and increase the incidence of default for such securities.
The Fund may acquire these bonds during an initial offering. Such
securities may involve special risks because they are new issues. The Fund has
no arrangement with the Distributor or any other persons concerning the
acquisition of such securities, and the Manager will review carefully the credit
and other characteristics pertinent to such new issues.
The credit risk factors pertaining to lower rated securities also apply to
lower rated zero coupon bonds, in which the Fund may invest up to 5% of its
total assets. Zero coupon bonds carry an additional risk in that, unlike bonds
which pay interest throughout the period to maturity, the Fund will realize no
cash until the cash payment date unless a portion of such securities are sold
and, if the issuer defaults, the Fund may obtain no return at all on its
investment. See "Dividends, Distributions and Taxes."
Simultaneous Investments. Investment decisions for the Fund are made
independently from those of other investment companies advised by the Manager.
If, however, such other investment companies desire to invest in, or dispose of,
the same securities as the Fund, available investments or opportunities for
sales will be allocated equitably to each investment company. In some cases,
this procedure may adversely affect the size of the position obtained for or
disposed of by the Fund or the price paid or received by the Fund.
Investment Restrictions
The Fund's investment objective is a fundamental policy, which cannot be
changed without approval by the holders of a majority (as defined in the 1940
Act) of the Fund's outstanding voting shares. In addition, the Fund has adopted
investment restrictions numbered 1 through 9 as fundamental policies. Investment
restrictions numbered 10 and 11 are not fundamental policies and may be changed
by a vote of a majority of the Fund's Board members at any time. The Fund may
not:
1. Purchase securities other than Municipal Obligations and Taxable
Investments and those arising out of transactions in futures and options or as
otherwise provided in the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional
Information.
2. Borrow money, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act
(which currently limits borrowing to no more than 33-1/3% of the value of the
Fund's total assets). Transactions in futures and options do not involve any
borrowings for purposes of this restriction.
3. Sell securities short or purchase securities on margin, except
for such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of transactions,
but the Fund may make margin deposits in connection with transactions in
futures, including those relating to indices, and options on futures contracts
or indices.
4. Underwrite the securities of other issuers, except that the Fund
may bid separately or as part of a group for the purchase of Municipal
Obligations directly from an issuer for its own portfolio to take advantage of
the lower purchase price available.
5. Purchase, hold or deal in real estate, real estate investment
trust securities or oil and gas interests, but the Fund may invest in Municipal
Obligations secured by real estate or interests therein.
6. Invest in commodities, except that the Fund may purchase and sell
futures contracts, including those relating to indices, and options on futures
contracts or indices, as described in the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of
Additional Information.
7. Lend any funds or other assets, except through the purchase of
qualified debt obligations and the entry into repurchase agreements referred to
above and in the Fund's Prospectus; however, the Fund may lend its portfolio
securities in an amount not to exceed 33-1/3% of the value of its total assets.
Any loans of portfolio securities will be made according to guidelines
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Fund's Board.
8. Invest more than 25% of its total assets in the securities of
issuers in any single industry; provided that there shall be no such limitation
on the purchase of Municipal Obligations and, for temporary defensive purposes,
obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies or
instrumentalities.
9. Purchase securities of other investment companies, except as they
may be acquired as part of a merger, consolidation or acquisition of assets.
10. Pledge, mortgage, hypothecate, or otherwise encumber its assets,
except to the extent necessary to secure permitted borrowings, and except to the
extent related to the deposit of assets in escrow in connection with the
purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis and collateral
and initial or variation margin arrangements with respect to futures contracts,
including those relating to indices, and options on futures contracts or
indices.
11. Enter into repurchase agreements providing for settlement in
more than seven days after notice or purchase securities which are illiquid if,
in the aggregate, more than 15% of the value of the Fund's net assets would be
so invested.
In addition, the Fund will not issue any senior security (as such term is
defined in Section 18(f) of the 1940 Act), except to the extent the activities
permitted in Investment Restriction Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 10 may be deemed to give
rise to a senior security.
For purposes of Investment Restriction No. 8, industrial development
bonds, where the payment of principal and interest is the ultimate
responsibility of companies within the same industry, are grouped together as an
"industry."
If a percentage restriction is adhered to at the time of investment, a
later increase or decrease in percentage resulting from a change in values or
assets will not constitute a violation of such restriction.
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
The Fund's Board is responsible for the management and supervision of the
Fund. The Board approves all significant agreements between the Fund and those
companies that furnish services to the Fund. These companies are as follows:
The Dreyfus Corporation.....................Investment Adviser
Premier Mutual Fund Services, Inc...........Distributor
Dreyfus Transfer, Inc.......................Transfer Agent
The Bank of New York........................Custodian
Board members and officers of the Fund, together with information as to
their principal business occupations during at least the last five years, are
shown below.
Board Members of the Fund
JOSEPH S. DiMARTINO, Chairman of the Board. Since January 1995, Chairman of the
Board of various funds in the Dreyfus Family of Funds. He also is a
director of The Muscular Dystrophy Association, HealthPlan Services
Corporation, a provider of marketing, administrative and risk management
services to health and other benefit programs, Carlyle Industries, Inc.
(formerly, Belding Heminway, Inc.), a button packager and distributor,
and Century Business Services, Inc. (formerly, International Alliance
Services, Inc.), a provider of various outsourcing functions for small
and medium sized companies. For more than five years prior to January
1995, he was President, a director and, until August 1994, Chief
Operating Officer of the Manager and Executive Vice President and a
director of Dreyfus Service Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Manager and, until August 24, 1994, the Fund's distributor. From
August 1994 until December 31, 1994, he was a director of Mellon
Financial Corporation. He is 56 years old and his address is 200 Park
Avenue, New York, New York 10166.
CLIFFORD L. ALEXANDER, JR., Board Member. President of Alexander &
Associates, Inc., a management consulting firm. From 1977 to 1981, Mr.
Alexander served as Secretary of the Army and Chairman of the Board of
the Panama Canal Company, and from 1975 to 1977, he was a member of the
Washington, D.C. law firm of Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson and
Alexander. He is a director of American Home Products Corporation, IMS
Health, a service provider of marketing information and information
technology, The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation, MCI WorldCom and Mutual
of America Life Insurance Company. He is 66 years old and his address
is 400 C Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20002.
PEGGY C. DAVIS, Board Member. Shad Professor of Law, New York University School
of Law. Professor Davis has been a member of the New York University law
faculty since 1983. Prior to that time, she served for three years as a
judge in the courts of New York State; was engaged for eight years in the
practice of law, working in both corporate and non-profit sectors; and
served for two years as a criminal justice administrator in the government
of the City of New York. She writes and teaches in the fields of evidence,
constitutional theory, family law, social sciences and the law, legal
process and professional methodology and training. She is 56 years old and
her address is c/o New York University School of Law, 40 Washington Square
South, New York, New York 10012.
ERNEST KAFKA, Board Member. A physician engaged in private practice specializing
in the psychoanalysis of adults and adolescents. Since 1981, he has served
as an Instructor at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute and, prior
thereto, held other teaching positions. He is Associate Clinical Professor
of Psychiatry at Cornell Medical School. For more than the past five
years, Dr. Kafka has held numerous administrative positions and has
published many articles on subjects in the field of psychoanalysis. He is
67 years old and his address is 23 East 92nd Street, New York, New York
10128.
NATHAN LEVENTHAL, Board Member. President of Lincoln Center for the Performing
Arts, Inc. Mr. Leventhal was Deputy Mayor for Operations of New York City
from September 1979 until March 1984 and Commissioner of the Department of
Housing Preservation and Development of New York City from February 1978
to September 1979. Mr. Leventhal was an associate and then a member of the
New York law firm of Poletti Freidin Prashker Feldman and Gartner from
1974 to 1978. He was Commissioner of Rent and Housing Maintenance for New
York City from 1972 to 1973. Mr. Leventhal served as Chairman of Citizens
Union, an organization which strives to reform and modernize city and
state government from June 1994 until June 1997. He is 56 years old and
his address is 70 Lincoln Center Plaza, New York, New York 10023-6583.
The Fund has a standing nominating committee comprised of its Board
members who are not "interested persons" of the Fund, as defined in the 1940
Act. The function of the nominating committee is to select and nominate all
candidates who are not "interested persons" of the Fund for election to the
Fund's Board.
The Fund typically pays its Board members an annual retainer and a per
meeting fee and reimburses them for their expenses. The Chairman of the Board
receives an additional 25% of such compensation. Emeritus Board members are
entitled to receive an annual retainer and a per meeting fee of one-half the
amount paid to them as Board members. The aggregate amount of compensation paid
to each Board member by the Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999,
and by all funds in the Dreyfus Family of Funds for which such person was a
Board member (the number of which is set forth in parenthesis next to each Board
member's total compensation)* for the year ended December 31, 1999, was as
follows:
Total Compensation
Aggregate from Fund and Fund
Name of Board Compensation from Complex Paid to
Member Fund** Board Member
Joseph S. DiMartino $6,250 $642,177.32 (189)
Peggy C. Davis $5,000 $68,377.72 (29)
Clifford L. Alexander, Jr. $5,000 $85,377.72 (43)
Ernest Kafka $5,000 $68,377.72 (29)
Saul B. Klaman*** $5,000 $68,377.72 (29)
Nathan Leventhal $5,000 $68,377.72 (29)
- ---------------------
* Represents the number of separate portfolios comprising the investment
companies in the Fund Complex, including the Fund, for which the Board
member serves.
** Amount does not include reimbursed expenses for attending Board meetings,
which amounted to $768 for all Board members as a group.
*** Emeritus Board Member as of January 18, 2000.
Officers of the Fund
MARIE E. CONNOLLY, President and Treasurer. President, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and a director of the Distributor and
Funds Distributor, Inc., the ultimate parent of which is Boston
Institutional Group, Inc., and an officer of other investment companies
advised or administered by the Manager. She is 42 years old.
MARGARET W. CHAMBERS, Vice President and Secretary. Senior Vice President
and General Counsel of Funds Distributor, Inc., and an officer of other
investment companies advised or administered by the Manager. From
August 1996 to March 1998, she was Vice President and Assistant General
Counsel for Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P. From January 1986 to July
1996, she was an associate with the law firm of Ropes & Gray. She is
40 years old.
*FREDERICK C. DEY, Vice President, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary. Vice President, New Business Development of Funds
Distributor, Inc. since September 1994, and an officer of other
investment companies advised or administered by the Manager. He is 38
years old.
STEPHANIE D. PIERCE, Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Assistant
Treasurer. Vice President of the Distributor and Funds Distributor,
Inc., and an officer of other investment companies advised or
administered by the Manager. From April 1997 to March 1998, she was
employed as a Relationship Manager with Citibank, N.A. From August
1995 to April 1997, she was an Assistant Vice President with Hudson
Valley Bank, and from September 1990 to August 1995, she was Second
Vice President with Chase Manhattan Bank. She is 31 years old.
MARY A. NELSON, Vice President and Assistant Treasurer. Vice President of
the Distributor and Funds Distributor, Inc., and an officer of other
investment companies advised or administered by the Manager. She is 35
years old.
*GEORGE A. RIO, Vice President and Assistant Treasurer. Executive Vice
President and Client Service Director of Funds Distributor, Inc., and
an officer of other investment companies advised or administered by the
Manager. From June 1995 to March 1998, he was Senior Vice President
and Senior Key Account Manager for Putnam Mutual Funds. From May 1994
to June 1995, he was Director of Business Development for First Data
Corporation. He is 44 years old.
JOSEPH F. TOWER, III, Vice President and Assistant Treasurer. Senior Vice
President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and a director of the
Distributor and Funds Distributor, Inc., and an officer of other
investment companies advised or administered by the Manager. He is 37
years old.
DOUGLAS C. CONROY, Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Assistant Vice
President of Funds Distributor, Inc., and an officer of other
investment companies advised or administered by the Manager. He is 30
years old.
*KAREN JACOPPO-WOOD, Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Vice President
and Senior Counsel of Funds Distributor, Inc. since February 1997, and
an officer of other investment companies advised or administered by the
Manager. From June 1994 to January 1996, she was Manager of SEC
Registration at Scudder, Stevens & Clark, Inc. She is 33 years old.
CHRISTOPHER J. KELLEY, Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Vice
President and Senior Associate General Counsel of Funds Distributor,
Inc., and an officer of other investment companies advised or
administered by the Manager. From April 1994 to July 1996, he was
Assistant Counsel at Forum Financial Group. He is 35 years old.
KATHLEEN K. MORRISEY, Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Manager of
Treasury Services Administration of Funds Distributor, Inc., and an
officer of other investment companies advised or administered by the
Manager. From July 1994 to November 1995, she was a Fund Accountant
for Investors Bank & Trust Company. She is 27 years old.
ELBA VASQUEZ, Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Assistant Vice
President of Funds Distributor, Inc., and an officer of other
investment companies advised or administered by the Manager. From
March 1990 to May 1996, she was employed by U.S. Trust Company of New
York where she held various sales and marketing positions. She is 38
years old.
The address of each officer of the Fund is 200 Park Avenue, New York, New
York 10166, except those officers indicated by an (*), whose address is 60 State
Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.
The Fund's Board members and officers, as a group, owned less than 1% of
the Fund's shares outstanding on January 4, 2000.
The following entity is known by the Fund to be the holder of record of
5% or more of the Fund's shares outstanding on January 4, 2000: Charles
Schwab & Co. Inc., Reinvest Account, 101 Montgomery Street, San Francisco,
California 94104-4122 (6.0401%).
MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS
Investment Adviser. The Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon
Bank, N.A., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation
("Mellon"). Mellon is a publicly owned multibank holding company incorporated
under Pennsylvania law in 1971 and registered under the Federal Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended. Mellon provides a comprehensive range of
financial products and services in domestic and selected international markets.
Mellon is among the twenty-five largest bank holding companies in the United
States based on total assets.
The Manager provides management services pursuant to the Management
Agreement (the "Agreement") between the Fund and the Manager, which is subject
to annual approval by (i) the Fund's Board or (ii) vote of a majority (as
defined in the 1940 Act) of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund,
provided that in either event the continuance also is approved by a majority of
the Board members who are not "interested persons" (as defined in the 1940 Act)
of the Fund or the Manager, by vote cast in person at a meeting called for the
purpose of voting on such approval. The Agreement is terminable without penalty,
on 60 days' notice, by the Fund's Board or by vote of the holders of a majority
of the Fund's shares, or, on not less than 90 days' notice, by the Manager. The
Agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its assignment (as
defined in the 1940 Act).
The following persons are officers and/or directors of the Manager:
Christopher M. Condron, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer;
Stephen E. Canter, President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Investment Officer
and a director; Thomas F. Eggers, Vice Chairman--Institutional and a director;
Lawrence S. Kash, Vice Chairman; J. David Officer, Vice Chairman and a director;
Ronald P. O'Hanley III, Vice Chairman; William T. Sandalls, Jr., Executive Vice
President; Stephen R. Byers, Senior Vice-President; Mark N. Jacobs, Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary; Diane P. Durnin, Vice
President--Product Development; Patrice M. Kozlowski, Vice President--Corporate
Communications; Mary Beth Leibig, Vice President--Human Resources; Ray Van Cott,
Vice President--Information Systems; Theodore A. Schachar, Vice President--Tax;
Wendy Strutt, Vice President; Richard Terres, Vice President; William H.
Maresca, Controller; James Bitetto, Assistant Secretary; Steven F. Newman,
Assistant Secretary; and Mandell L. Berman, Burton C. Borgelt, Steven G. Elliot,
Martin C. McGuinn, Richard W. Sabo and Richard F. Syron, directors.
The Manager manages the Fund's portfolio of investments in accordance
with the stated policies of the Fund, subject to the approval of the Fund's
Board. The Manager is responsible for investment decisions, and provides the
Fund with portfolio managers who are authorized by the Fund's Board to
execute purchases and sales of securities. The Fund's portfolio managers are
Joseph P. Darcy, A. Paul Disdier, Douglas J. Gaylor, Joseph Irace, Colleen
Meehan, Richard J. Moynihan, W. Michael Petty, Jill C. Shaffro, Scott
Sprauer, Samuel J. Weinstock and Monica S. Wieboldt. The Manager also
maintains a research department with a professional staff of portfolio
managers and securities analysts who provide research services for the Fund
and for other funds advised by the Manager.
All expenses incurred in the operation of the Fund are borne by the Fund,
except to the extent specifically assumed by the Manager. The expenses borne by
the Fund include, without limitation: taxes, interest, loan commitment fees,
interest and distributions paid on securities sold short, brokerage fees and
commissions, if any, fees of Board members who are not officers, directors,
employees or holder of 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the
Manager, Securities and Exchange Commission fees, state Blue Sky qualification
fees, advisory fees, charges of custodians, transfer and dividend disbursing
agents' fees, certain insurance premiums, industry association fees, outside
auditing and legal expenses, costs of maintaining corporate existence, costs of
independent pricing services, costs attributable to investor services
(including, without limitation, telephone and personnel expenses), costs of
preparing and printing prospectuses and statements of additional information for
regulatory purposes and for distribution to existing shareholders, costs of
shareholders' reports and meetings, and any extraordinary expenses.
The Manager maintains office facilities on behalf of the Fund, and
furnishes statistical and research data, clerical help, accounting, data
processing, bookkeeping and internal auditing and certain other required
services to the Fund. The Manager may pay the Distributor for shareholder
services from the Manager's own assets, including past profits but not including
the management fee paid by the Fund. The Distributor may use part or all of such
payments to pay Service Agents (as defined below) in respect of these services.
The Manager also may make such advertising and promotional expenditures, using
its own resources, as it from time to time deems appropriate.
Under the Manager's personal securities trading policy (the "Policy"), the
Manager's employees must preclear personal transactions in securities not exempt
under the Policy. In addition, the Manager's employees must report their
personal securities transactions and holdings, which are reviewed for compliance
with the Policy. In that regard, the Manager's portfolio managers and other
investment personnel also are subject to the oversight of Mellon's Investment
Ethics Committee. The Manager's portfolio managers and other investment
personnel who comply with the Policy's preclearance and disclosure procedures,
and the requirements of the Committee, may be permitted to purchase, sell or
hold securities which also may be or are held in fund(s) they manage or for
which they otherwise provide investment advice.
As compensation for the Manager's services, the Fund has agreed to pay the
Manager a monthly management fee at the annual rate of 0.60% of the value of the
Fund's average daily net assets. All fees and expenses are accrued daily and
deducted before payment of dividends to investors. For the fiscal years ended
September 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999, the management fees paid by the Fund amounted
to $1,760,909, $1,749,203 and $1,706,478, respectively.
The Manager has agreed that if in any fiscal year the aggregate expenses
of the Fund, exclusive of taxes, brokerage fees, interest on borrowings and
(with the prior written consent of the necessary state securities commissions)
extraordinary expenses, but including the management fee, exceed the expense
limitation of any state having jurisdiction over the Fund, the Fund may deduct
from the payment to be made to the Manager under the Agreement, or the Manager
will bear, such excess expense to the extent required by state law. Such
deduction or payment, if any, will be estimated daily, and reconciled and
effected or paid, as the case may be, on a monthly basis.
The aggregate of the fees payable to the Manager is not subject to
reduction as the value of the Fund's net assets increases.
Distributor. The Distributor, located at 60 State Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109, serves as the Fund's distributor on a best efforts basis
pursuant to an agreement which is renewable annually.
Transfer and Dividend Disbursing Agent and Custodian. Dreyfus Transfer,
Inc. (the "Transfer Agent"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, P.O. Box
9671, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-9671, is the Fund's transfer and dividend
disbursing agent. Under a transfer agency agreement with the Fund, the Transfer
Agent arranges for the maintenance of shareholder account records for the Fund,
the handling of certain communications between shareholders and the Fund and the
payment of dividends and distributions payable by the Fund. For these services,
the Transfer Agent receives a monthly fee computed on the basis of the number of
shareholder accounts it maintains for the Fund during the month, and is
reimbursed for certain out-of-pocket expenses.
The Bank of New York (the "Custodian"), 100 Church Street, New York, New
York 10286, is the Fund's custodian. The Custodian has no part in determining
the investment policies of the Fund or which securities are to be purchased or
sold by the Fund. Under a custody agreement with the Fund, the Custodian holds
the Fund's securities and keeps all necessary accounts and records. For its
custody services, the Custodian receives a monthly fee based on the market value
of the Fund's assets held in custody and receives certain securities
transactions charges.
HOW TO BUY SHARES
General. Fund shares may be purchased through the Distributor or certain
financial institutions (which may include banks), securities dealers and other
industry professionals, such as investment advisers, accountants and estate
planning firms (collectively, "Service Agents") that have entered into service
agreements with the Distributor. Stock certificates are issued only upon your
written request. No certificates are issued for fractional shares. It is not
recommended that the Fund be used as a vehicle for Keogh, IRA or other qualified
plans. The Fund reserves the right to reject any purchase order.
The minimum initial investment is $2,500, or $1,000 if you are a client of
a Service Agent which maintains an omnibus account in the Fund and has made an
aggregate minimum initial purchase for its customers of $2,500. Subsequent
investments must be at least $100. The initial investment must be accompanied by
the Account Application. For full-time or part-time employees of the Manager or
any of its affiliates or subsidiaries, directors of the Manager, Board members
of a fund advised by the Manager, including members of the Fund's Board, or the
spouse or minor child of any of the foregoing, the minimum initial investment is
$1,000. For full-time or part-time employees of the Manager or any of its
affiliates or subsidiaries who elect to have a portion of their pay directly
deposited into their Fund accounts, the minimum initial investment is $50. The
Fund reserves the right to vary the initial and subsequent investment minimum
requirements at any time.
Fund shares also are offered without regard to the minimum initial
investment requirements through Dreyfus-Automatic Asset Builder(R), Dreyfus
Government Direct Deposit Privilege or Dreyfus Payroll Savings Plan pursuant to
the Dreyfus Step Program described under "Shareholder Services." These services
enable you to make regularly scheduled investments and may provide you with a
convenient way to invest for long-term financial goals. You should be aware,
however, that periodic investment plans do not guarantee a profit and will not
protect an investor against loss in a declining market.
Management understands that some Service Agents may impose certain
conditions on their clients which are different from those described in the
Fund's Prospectus and this Statement of Additional Information, and, to the
extent permitted by applicable regulatory authority, may charge their clients
direct fees. You should consult your Service Agent in this regard.
Shares are sold on a continuous basis at the net asset value per share
next determined after an order in proper form is received by the Transfer Agent
or other entity authorized to receive orders on behalf of the Fund. Net asset
value per share is determined as of the close of trading on the floor of the New
York Stock Exchange (currently 4:00 p.m., New York time) on each day the New
York Stock Exchange is open for business. For purposes of computing net asset
value per share, options and futures will be valued 15 minutes after the close
of trading on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Net asset value per
share is computed by dividing the value of the Fund's net assets (i.e., the
value of its assets less liabilities) by the total number of shares outstanding.
The Fund's investments are valued by an independent pricing service approved by
the Fund's Board and are valued at fair value as determined by the pricing
service. The pricing service's procedures are reviewed under the general
supervision of the Fund's Board. For further information regarding the methods
employed in valuing the Fund's investments, see "Determination of Net Asset
Value."
Dreyfus TeleTransfer Privilege. You may purchase shares by telephone if
you have checked the appropriate box and supplied the necessary information on
the Account Application or have filed a Shareholder Services Form with the
Transfer Agent. The proceeds will be transferred between the bank account
designated in one of these documents and your Fund account. Only a bank account
maintained in a domestic financial institution which is an Automated Clearing
House ("ACH") member may be so designated.
Dreyfus TeleTransfer purchase orders may be made at any time. Purchase
orders received by 4:00 p.m., New York time, on any day that the Transfer Agent
and the New York Stock Exchange are open for business will be credited to the
shareholder's Fund account on the next bank business day following such purchase
order. Purchase orders made after 4:00 p.m., New York time, on any day the
Transfer Agent and the New York Stock Exchange are open for business, or orders
made on Saturday, Sunday or any Fund holiday (e.g., when the New York Stock
Exchange is not open for business), will be credited to the shareholder's Fund
account on the second bank business day following such purchase order. To
qualify to use the Dreyfus TeleTransfer Privilege, the initial payment for
purchase of Fund shares must be drawn on, and redemption proceeds paid to, the
same bank and account as are designated on the Account Application or
Shareholder Services Form on file. If the proceeds of a particular redemption
are to be wired to an account at any other bank, the request must be in writing
and signature-guaranteed. See "How to Redeem Shares--Dreyfus TeleTransfer
Privilege."
Reopening an Account. You may reopen an account with a minimum investment
of $100 without filing a new Account Application during the calendar year the
account is closed or during the following calendar year, provided the
information on the old Account Application is still applicable.
SERVICE PLAN
Rule 12b-1 (the "Rule") adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission
under the 1940 Act provides, among other things, that an investment company may
bear expenses of distributing its shares only pursuant to a plan adopted in
accordance with the Rule. The Fund's Board has adopted, but not implemented,
such a plan (the "Service Plan") pursuant to which the Fund may (i) reimburse
the Distributor for payments to Service Agents for distributing the Fund's
shares and servicing shareholder accounts ("Servicing") and (ii) pay the
Manager, Dreyfus Service Corporation and any affiliate of either of them
(collectively, "Dreyfus") for advertising and marketing relating to the Fund and
for servicing shareholder accounts, at an aggregate annual rate of 0.25% of the
value of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Fund's Board believes that
there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plan may benefit the Fund and its
shareholders.
Each of the Distributor and Dreyfus may pay one or more Service Agents a
fee in respect of Fund shares owned by shareholders with whom the Service Agent
has a Servicing relationship or for whom the Service Agent is the dealer or
holder of record. Each of the Distributor and Dreyfus determine the amount, if
any, to be paid to Service Agents under the Service Plan and the basis on which
such payments are made. The fees payable under the Service Plan are payable
without regard to actual expenses incurred.
The Fund is permitted to bear the costs of preparing and printing
prospectuses and statements of additional information used for regulatory
purposes and for distribution to existing shareholders. Under the Service Plan,
the Fund is permitted to bear (a) the costs of preparing, printing and
distributing prospectuses and statements of additional information used for
other purposes and (b) the costs associated with implementing and operating the
Service Plan (such as costs of printing and mailing service agreements), the
aggregate of such amounts not to exceed in any fiscal year of the Fund the
greater of $100,000 or 0.005% of the value of the Fund's average daily net
assets for such fiscal year. Each item for which a payment may be made under the
Service Plan may constitute an expense of distributing Fund shares as the
Securities and Exchange Commission construes such term under the Rule.
A quarterly report of the amounts expended under the Service Plan, and the
purposes for which such expenditures were incurred, must be made to the Board
for its review. In addition, the Service Plan provides that it may not be
amended to increase materially the costs which the Fund may bear for
distribution pursuant to the Service Plan without shareholder approval and that
other material amendments of the Service Plan must be approved by the Board, and
by the Board members who are not "interested persons" (as defined in the 1940
Act) of the Fund or the Manager and have no direct or indirect financial
interest in the operation of the Service Plan or in the related service
agreements, by vote cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of
considering such amendments. The Service Plan and the related service agreements
are subject to annual approval by such vote of the Board members cast in person
at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on the Service Plan. The Plan is
terminable at any time by vote of a majority of the Board members who are not
"interested persons" and have no direct or indirect financial interest in the
operation of the Service Plan or in any of the related service agreements or by
vote of a majority of the Fund's shares.
Management of the Fund currently does not intend to implement the Service
Plan and will only do so if prior written notice is given to shareholders.
SHAREHOLDER SERVICES PLAN
The Fund has adopted a Shareholder Services Plan pursuant to which the
Fund reimburses Dreyfus Service Corporation an amount not to exceed an annual
rate of 0.25% of the value of the Fund's average daily net assets for certain
allocated expenses of providing personal services and/or maintaining shareholder
accounts. The services provided may include personal services relating to
shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the Fund
and providing reports and other information, and services related to the
maintenance of shareholder accounts.
A quarterly report of the amounts expended under the Shareholder Services
Plan, and the purposes for which such expenditures were incurred, must be made
to the Fund's Board for its review. In addition, the Shareholder Services Plan
provides that material amendments must be approved by the Fund's Board and by
the Board members who are not "interested persons" (as defined in the 1940 Act)
of the Fund and have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation
of the Shareholder Services Plan, by vote cast in person at a meeting called for
the purpose of considering such amendments. The Shareholder Services Plan is
subject to annual approval by such vote of the Board members cast in person at a
meeting called for the purpose of voting on the Plan The Shareholder Services
Plan is terminable at any time by vote of a majority of the Board members who
are not "interested persons" and have no direct or indirect financial interest
in the operation of the Shareholder Services Plan.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, the Fund was charged
$206,611 pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
HOW TO REDEEM SHARES
Redemption Fee. The Fund will deduct a redemption fee equal to 0.10% of
the net asset value of Fund shares redeemed (including redemptions through the
use of the Fund Exchanges service) less than 15 days following the issuance of
such shares. The redemption fee will be deducted from the redemption proceeds
and retained by the Fund. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, the Fund
retained $36 in redemption fees.
No redemption fee will be charged on the redemption or exchange of shares
(i) through the Fund's Check Redemption Privilege, Automatic Withdrawal Plan or
Dreyfus Auto-Exchange Privilege, (ii) through accounts that are reflected on the
records of the Transfer Agent as omnibus accounts approved by Dreyfus Service
Corporation, (iii) through accounts established by securities dealers, banks or
other financial institutions approved by Dreyfus Service Corporation that
utilize the National Securities Clearing Corporation's networking system, or
(iv) acquired through the reinvestment of dividends or distributions. The
redemption fee may be waived, modified or terminated at any time.
Check Redemption Privilege. The Fund provides Redemption Checks ("Checks")
automatically upon opening an account, unless you specifically refuse the Check
Redemption Privilege by checking the applicable "No" box on the Account
Application. The Check Redemption Privilege may be established for an existing
account by a separate signed Shareholder Services Form. Checks will be sent only
to the registered owner(s) of the account and only to the address of record. The
Account Application or Shareholder Services Form must be manually signed by the
registered owner(s). Checks may be made payable to the order of any person in an
amount of $500 or more. When a Check is presented to the Transfer Agent for
payment, the Transfer Agent, as your agent, will cause the Fund to redeem a
sufficient number of shares in your account to cover the amount of the Check.
Dividends are earned until the Check clears. After clearance, a copy of the
Check will be returned to you. You generally will be subject to the same rules
and regulations that apply to checking accounts, although the election of this
Privilege creates only a shareholder-transfer agent relationship with the
Transfer Agent.
You should date your Checks with the current date when you write them.
Please do not postdate your Checks. If you do, the Transfer Agent will honor,
upon presentment, even if presented before the date of the Check, all postdated
Checks which are dated within six months of presentment for payment, if they are
otherwise in good order.
Checks are free, but the Transfer Agent will impose a fee for stopping
payment of a Check upon your request or if the Transfer Agent cannot honor a
Check due to insufficient funds or other valid reason. If the amount of the
Check is greater than the value of the shares in your account, the Check will be
returned marked insufficient funds. Checks should not be used to close an
account.
This Privilege will be terminated immediately, without notice, with
respect to any account which is, or becomes, subject to backup withholding on
redemptions. Any check written on an account which has become subject to backup
withholding on redemptions will not be honored by the Transfer Agent.
Wire Redemption Privilege. By using this Privilege, you authorize the
Transfer Agent to act on wire, telephone or letter redemption instructions from
any person representing himself or herself to be you and reasonably believed by
the Transfer Agent to be genuine. Ordinarily, the Fund will initiate payment for
shares redeemed pursuant to this Privilege on the next business day after
receipt by the Transfer Agent of a redemption request in proper form. Redemption
proceeds ($1,000 minimum) will be transferred by Federal Reserve wire only to
the commercial bank account specified by you on the Account Application or
Shareholder Services Form, or to a correspondent bank if your bank is not a
member of the Federal Reserve System. Fees ordinarily are imposed by such bank
and borne by the investor. Immediate notification by the correspondent bank to
your bank is necessary to avoid a delay in crediting the funds to your bank
account.
If you have access to telegraphic equipment, you may wire redemption
requests to the Transfer Agent by employing the following transmittal code which
may be used for domestic or overseas transmissions:
Transfer Agent's
Transmittal Code Answer Back Sign
144295 144295 TSSG PREP
If you do not have direct access to telegraphic equipment, you may have
the wire transmitted by contacting a TRT Cables operator at 1-800-654-7171, toll
free. You should advise the operator that the above transmittal code must be
used and should also inform the operator of the Transfer Agent's answer back
sign.
To change the commercial bank or account designated to receive redemption
proceeds, a written request must be sent to the Transfer Agent. This request
must be signed by each shareholder, with each signature guaranteed as described
below under "Stock Certificates; Signatures."
Dreyfus TeleTransfer Privilege. You may request by telephone that
redemption proceeds be transferred between your Fund account and your bank
account. Only a bank account maintained in a domestic financial institution
which is an ACH member may be designated. Holders of jointly registered Fund or
bank accounts may redeem through the Dreyfus TeleTransfer Privilege for transfer
to their bank account not more than $500,000 within any 30-day period. You
should be aware that if you have selected the Dreyfus TeleTransfer Privilege,
any request for a wire redemption will be effected as a Dreyfus TeleTransfer
transaction through the ACH system unless more prompt transmittal specifically
is requested. Redemption proceeds will be on deposit in the your account at an
ACH member bank ordinarily two business days after receipt of the redemption
request. See "How to Buy Shares--Dreyfus TeleTransfer Privilege."
Stock Certificates; Signatures. Any certificates representing Fund shares
to be redeemed must be submitted with the redemption request. Written redemption
requests must be signed by each shareholder, including each holder of a joint
account, and each signature must be guaranteed. Signatures on endorsed
certificates submitted for redemption also must be guaranteed. The Transfer
Agent has adopted standards and procedures pursuant to which
signature-guarantees in proper form generally will be accepted from domestic
banks, brokers, dealers, credit unions, national securities exchanges,
registered securities associations, clearing agencies and savings associations,
as well as from participants in the New York Stock Exchange Medallion Signature
Program, the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program ("STAMP") and the
Stock Exchanges Medallion Program. Guarantees must be signed by an authorized
signatory of the guarantor, and "Signature-Guaranteed" must appear with the
signature. The Transfer Agent may request additional documentation from
corporations, executors, administrators, trustees or guardians, and may accept
other suitable verification arrangements from foreign investors, such as
consular verification. For more information with respect to
signature-guarantees, please call the telephone number listed on the cover.
Redemption Commitment. The Fund has committed itself to pay in cash all
redemption requests by any shareholder of record, limited in amount during any
90-day period to the lesser of $250,000 or 1% of the value of the Fund's net
assets at the beginning of such period. Such commitment is irrevocable without
the prior approval of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the case of
requests for redemption in excess of such amount, the Board reserves the right
to make payments in whole or in part in securities or other assets of the Fund
in case of an emergency or any time a cash distribution would impair the
liquidity of the Fund to the detriment of the existing shareholders. In such
event, the securities would be valued in the same manner as the Fund's portfolio
is valued. If the recipient sells such securities, brokerage charges might be
incurred.
Suspension of Redemptions. The right of redemption may be suspended or the
date of payment postponed (a) during any period when the New York Stock Exchange
is closed (other than customary weekend and holiday closings), (b) when trading
in the markets the Fund ordinarily utilizes is restricted, or when an emergency
exists as determined by the Securities and Exchange Commission so that disposal
of the Fund's investments or determination of its net asset value is not
reasonably practicable, or (c) for such other periods as the Securities and
Exchange Commission by order may permit to protect the Fund's shareholders.
SHAREHOLDER SERVICES
Fund Exchanges. You may purchase, in exchange for shares of the Fund,
shares of certain other funds managed or administered by the Manager or Founders
Asset Management LLC ("Founders"), an affiliate of the Manager, to the extent
such shares are offered for sale in your state of residence. The Fund will
deduct a redemption fee equal to 0.10% of the net asset value of Fund shares
exchanged where the exchange is made less than 15 days after the issuance of
such shares. Shares of other funds purchased by exchange will be purchased on
the basis of relative net asset value per share as follows:
A. Exchanges for shares of funds offered without a sales load
will be made without a sales load.
B. Shares of funds purchased without a sales load may be
exchanged for shares of other funds sold with a sales load,
and the applicable sales load will be deducted.
C. Shares of funds purchased with a sales load may be exchanged
without a sales load for shares of other funds sold without a
sales load.
D. Shares of funds purchased with a sales load, shares of
funds acquired by a previous exchange from shares purchased
with a sales load and additional shares acquired through
reinvestment of dividends or distributions of any such
funds (collectively referred to herein as "Purchased
Shares") may be exchanged for shares of other funds sold
with a sales load (referred to herein as "Offered Shares"),
but, if the sales load applicable to the Offered Shares
exceeds the maximum sales load that could have been imposed
in connection with the Purchased Shares (at the time the
Purchased Shares were acquired), without giving effect to
any reduced loads, the difference will be deducted.
To accomplish an exchange under item D above, you must notify the Transfer
Agent of your prior ownership of fund shares and your account number.
To request an exchange, you must give exchange instructions to the
Transfer Agent in writing or by telephone. The ability to issue exchange
instructions by telephone is given to all Fund shareholders automatically,
unless you check the applicable "No" box on the Account Application, indicating
that you specifically refuse this Privilege. By using the Telephone Exchange
Privilege, you authorize the Transfer Agent to act on telephonic instructions
(including over The Dreyfus Touch(R) automated telephone system) from any person
representing himself or herself to be you and reasonably believed by the
Transfer Agent to be genuine. Telephone exchanges may be subject to limitations
as to the amount involved or the number of telephone exchanges permitted. Shares
issued in certificate form are not eligible for telephone exchange. No fees
currently are charged shareholders directly in connection with exchanges,
although the Fund reserves the right, upon not less than 60 days' written
notice, to charge shareholders a nominal administrative fee in accordance with
rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
To establish a personal retirement plan by exchange, shares of the fund
being exchanged must have a value of at least the minimum initial investment
required for the fund into which the exchange is being made.
Dreyfus Auto-Exchange Privilege. Dreyfus Auto-Exchange Privilege permits
you to purchase, in exchange for shares of the Fund, shares of another fund in
the Dreyfus Family of Funds or certain funds advised by Founders of which you
are a shareholder. This Privilege is available only for existing accounts.
Shares will be exchanged on the basis of relative net asset value as described
above under "Fund Exchanges." Enrollment in or modification or cancellation of
this Privilege is effective three business days following notification by the
investor. You will be notified if your account falls below the amount designated
to be exchanged under this Privilege. In this case, your account will fall to
zero unless additional investments are made in excess of the designated amount
prior to the next Auto-Exchange transaction. Shares held under IRA and other
retirement plans are eligible for this Privilege. Exchanges of IRA shares may be
made between IRA accounts and from regular accounts to IRA accounts, but not
from IRA accounts to regular accounts. With respect to all other retirement
accounts, exchanges may be made only among those accounts.
Fund Exchanges and the Dreyfus Auto-Exchange Privilege are available to
shareholders resident in any state in which shares of the fund being acquired
may legally be sold. Shares may be exchanged only between accounts having
identical names and other identifying designations.
Shareholder Services Forms and prospectuses of the other funds may be
obtained by calling 1-800-645-6561. The Fund reserves the right to reject any
exchange request in whole or in part. The Fund Exchanges service or the Dreyfus
Auto-Exchange Privilege may be modified or terminated at any time upon notice to
shareholders.
Dreyfus-Automatic Asset Builder(R). Dreyfus-Automatic Asset Builder
permits you to purchase Fund shares (minimum of $100 and maximum of $150,000 per
transaction) at regular intervals selected by you. Fund shares are purchased by
transferring funds from the bank account designated by you.
Dreyfus Government Direct Deposit Privilege. Dreyfus Government Direct
Deposit Privilege enables you to purchase Fund shares (minimum of $100 and
maximum of $50,000 per transaction) by having Federal salary, Social Security,
or certain veterans', military or other payments from the U.S. Government
automatically deposited into your fund account. You may deposit as much of such
payments as you elect.
Dreyfus Payroll Savings Plan. Dreyfus Payroll Savings Plan permits you to
purchase Fund shares (minimum of $100 per transaction) automatically on a
regular basis. Depending upon your employer's direct deposit program, you may
have part or all of your paycheck transferred to your existing Dreyfus account
electronically through the ACH system at each pay period. To establish a Dreyfus
Payroll Savings Plan account, you must file an authorization form with your
employer's payroll department. It is the sole responsibility of your employer to
arrange for transactions under the Dreyfus Payroll Savings Plan.
Dreyfus Step Program. The Dreyfus Step Program enables you to purchase
Fund shares without regard to the Fund's minimum initial investment requirements
through Dreyfus-Automatic Asset Builder(R), Dreyfus Government Direct Deposit
Privilege or Dreyfus Payroll Savings Plan. To establish a Dreyfus Step Program
account, you must supply the necessary information on the Account Application
and file the required authorization form(s) with the Transfer Agent. For more
information concerning this Program, or to request the necessary authorization
form(s), please call toll free 1-800-782-6620. You may terminate your
participation in this Program at any time by discontinuing your participation in
Dreyfus-Automatic Asset Builder, Dreyfus Government Direct Deposit Privilege or
Dreyfus Payroll Savings Plan, as the case may be, as provided under the terms of
such Privilege(s). The Fund may modify or terminate this Program at any time.
Dreyfus Dividend Options. Dreyfus Dividend Sweep allows you to invest
automatically your dividends or dividends and capital gain distributions, if
any, from the Fund in shares of another fund in the Dreyfus Family of Funds or
certain funds advised by Founders of which you are a shareholder. Shares of
other funds purchased pursuant to this privilege will be purchased on the basis
of relative net asset value per share as follows:
A. Dividends and distributions paid by a fund may be invested
without imposition of a sales load in shares of other funds
offered without a sales load.
B. Dividends and distributions paid by a fund which does not
charge a sales load may be invested in shares of other funds
sold with a sales load, and the applicable sales load will be
deducted.
C. Dividends and distributions paid by a fund that charges a
sales load may be invested in shares of other funds sold
with a sales load (referred to herein as "Offered Shares"),
but if the sales load applicable to the Offered Shares
exceeds the maximum sales load charged by the fund from
which dividends or distributions are being swept (without
giving effect to any reduced loads) the difference will be
deducted.
D. Dividends and distributions paid by a fund may be invested in
shares of other funds that impose a contingent deferred sales
charge ("CDSC") and the applicable CDSC, if any, will be
imposed upon redemption of such shares.
Dreyfus Dividend ACH permits you to transfer electronically dividends or
dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, from the Fund to a designated
bank account. Only an account maintained at a domestic financial institution
which is an ACH member may be so designated. Banks may charge a fee for this
service.
Automatic Withdrawal Plan. The Automatic Withdrawal Plan permits you to
request withdrawal of a specified dollar amount (minimum of $50) on either a
monthly or quarterly basis if you have a $5,000 minimum account. Withdrawal
payments are the proceeds from sales of Fund shares, not the yield on the
shares. If withdrawal payments exceed reinvested dividends and distributions,
your shares will be reduced and eventually may be depleted. Automatic Withdrawal
may be terminated at any time by you, the Fund or the Transfer Agent. Shares for
which certificates have been issued may not be redeemed through the Automatic
Withdrawal Plan.
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE
Valuation of Portfolio Securities. The Fund's investments are valued each
business day by an independent pricing service (the "Service") approved by the
Fund's Board. When, in the judgment of the Service, quoted bid prices for
investments are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the
market, these investments are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices
(as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices
(as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such
securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio
securities) are carried at fair value as determined by the Service, based on
methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of municipal bonds of
comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from
dealers; and general market conditions. The Service may employ electronic data
processing techniques and/or a matrix system to determine valuations. The
Service's procedures are reviewed by the Fund's officers under the general
supervision of the Fund's Board. Expenses and fees, including the management fee
(reduced by the expense limitation, if any), are accrued daily and are taken
into account for the purpose of determining the net asset value of Fund shares.
New York Stock Exchange Closings. The holidays (as observed) on which
the New York Stock Exchange is closed currently are: New Year's Day, Martin
Luther King Jr. Day, Presidents' Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence
Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas.
DIVIDENDS, DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES
Management believes that the Fund has qualified for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999 as a "regulated investment company" under the Code. The Fund
intends to continue to so qualify if such qualification is in the best interests
of its shareholders. Such qualification relieves the Fund of any liability for
Federal income tax to the extent its earnings are distributed in accordance with
applicable provisions of the Code. If the Fund did not qualify as a regulated
investment company, it would be treated for tax purposes as an ordinary
corporation subject to Federal income tax.
The Fund ordinarily declares dividends from its net investment income on
each day the New York Stock Exchange is open for business. Fund shares begin
earning income dividends on the day following the date of purchase. Dividends
usually are paid on the last business day of each month and are automatically
reinvested in additional Fund shares at net asset value or, at your option, paid
in cash. The Fund's earnings for Saturdays, Sundays and holidays are declared as
dividends on the next business day. If you redeem all shares in your account at
any time during the month, all dividends to which you are entitled will be paid
to you along with the proceeds of the redemption. If you are an omnibus
accountholder and indicate in a partial redemption request that a portion of any
accrued dividends to which such account is entitled belongs to an underlying
accountholder who has redeemed all shares in his or her account, such portion of
the accrued dividends will be paid to you along with the proceeds of the
redemption.
If you elect to receive dividends and distributions in cash, and your
dividend or distribution check is returned to the Fund as undeliverable or
remains uncashed for six months, the Fund reserves the right to reinvest such
dividend or distribution and all future dividends and distributions payable to
you in additional Fund shares at net asset value. No interest will accrue on
amounts represented by uncashed distribution or redemption checks.
If, at the close of each quarter of its taxable year, at least 50% of the
value of the Fund's total assets consists of Federal tax exempt obligations,
then the Fund may designate and pay Federal exempt-interest dividends from
interest earned on all such tax exempt obligations. Such exempt-interest
dividends may be excluded by shareholders of the Fund from their gross income
for Federal income tax purposes. Dividends derived from Taxable Investments,
together with distributions from any net realized short-term securities gains,
generally are taxable as ordinary income for Federal income tax purposes whether
or not reinvested. Distributions from net realized long-term securities gains
generally are taxable as long-term capital gains to a shareholder who is a
citizen or resident of the United States, whether or not reinvested and
regardless of the length of time the shareholder has held his shares.
If, at the close of each quarter of its taxable year, at least 50% of the
value of the Fund's total assets consists of obligations which, when held by an
individual, the interest therefrom is exempt from California personal income
tax, and if the Fund qualifies as a management company under the California
Revenue and Taxation Code, the Fund will be qualified to pay dividends to its
shareholders that are exempt from California personal income tax (but not from
California franchise tax) ("California exempt-interest dividends"). However, the
total amount of California exempt-interest dividends paid by the Fund to a
non-corporate shareholder with respect to any taxable year cannot exceed such
shareholder's pro rata share of interest received by the fund during such year
that is exempt from California taxation less any expenses and expenditures
deemed to have been paid from such interest.
For shareholders subject to the California personal income tax,
exempt-interest dividends derived from California Municipal Obligations will not
be subject to the California personal income tax. Distributions from net
realized short-term capital gains to California resident shareholders will be
subject to the California personal income tax as ordinary income. Distributions
from net realized long-term capital gains may constitute long-term capital gains
for individual California resident shareholders. Unlike under Federal tax law,
the Fund's shareholders will not be subject to California personal income tax,
or receive a credit for California taxes paid by the Fund, on undistributed
capital gains. In addition, California tax law does not consider any portion of
the exempt-interest dividends paid an item of tax preference for the purposes of
computing the California alternative minimum tax.
Any dividend or distribution paid shortly after an investor's purchase may
have the effect of reducing the aggregate net asset value of the shares below
the cost of his investment. Such a distribution would be a return on investment
in an economic sense although taxable as stated under "Distributions and Taxes"
in the Prospectus. In addition, the Code provides that if a shareholder holds
Fund shares for six months or less and has received an exempt-interest dividend
with respect to such shares, any loss incurred on the sale of such shares will
be disallowed to the extent of the exempt-interest dividend received.
Ordinarily, gains and losses realized from portfolio transactions will be
treated as capital gains or losses. However, all or a portion of any gains
realized from the sale or other disposition of certain market discount bonds
will be treated as ordinary income under Section 1276 of the Code. In addition,
all or a portion of the gain realized from engaging in "conversion transactions"
may be treated as ordinary income under Section 1258 of the Code. "Conversion
transactions" are defined to include certain forward, futures, option and
"straddle" transactions, transactions marketed or sold to produce capital gains,
or transactions described in Treasury regulations to be issued in the future.
Under Section 1256 of the Code, any gain or loss realized by the Fund from
certain financial futures and options transactions will be treated as 60%
long-term capital gain or loss and 40% short-term capital gain or loss. Gain or
loss will arise upon exercise or lapse of such futures and options as well as
from closing transactions. In addition, any such futures or options remaining
unexercised at the end of the Fund's taxable year will be treated as sold for
their then fair market value, resulting in additional gain or loss to the Fund
characterized as described above.
Offsetting positions held by the Fund involving certain financial futures
contracts or options transactions may be considered, for tax purposes, to
constitute "straddles." "Straddles" are defined to include "offsetting
positions" in actively traded personal property. The tax treatment of
"straddles" is governed by Sections 1092 and 1258 of the Code, which, in certain
circumstances, override or modify the provisions of Section 1256 of the Code. As
such, all or a portion of any short or long-term capital gain from certain
"straddle" and/or conversion transactions may be recharacterized as ordinary
income.
If the Fund were treated as entering into "straddles" by reason of its
engaging in financial futures contracts or options transactions, such
"straddles" would be characterized as "mixed straddles" if the futures or
options comprising a part of such "straddles" were governed by Section 1256 of
the Code. The Fund may make one or more elections with respect to "mixed
straddles." If no election is made, to the extent the straddle and conversion
transaction rules apply to positions established by the Fund, losses realized by
the Fund will be deferred to the extent of unrealized gain in the related
offsetting position. Moreover, as a result of the straddle and the conversion
transaction rules, short-term capital loss on straddle positions may be
recharacterized as long-term capital loss, and long-term capital gain on
straddle positions may be recharacterized as short-term capital gain or ordinary
income.
The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 included constructive sale provisions that
generally apply if the Fund either (1) holds an appreciated financial position
with respect to stock, certain debt obligations, or partnership interests
("appreciated financial position") and then enters into a short sale, futures,
forward, or offsetting notional principal contract (collectively, a "Contract")
respecting the same or substantially identical property or (2) holds an
appreciated financial position that is a Contract and then acquires property
that is the same as, or substantially identical to, the underlying property. In
each instance, with certain exceptions, the Fund generally will be taxed as if
the appreciated financial position were sold at its fair market value on the
date the Fund enters into the financial position or acquires the property,
respectively. Transactions that are identified as hedging or straddle
transactions under other provisions of the Code can be subject to the
constructive sale provisions.
Investment by the Fund in securities issued at a discount or providing for
deferred interest or for payment of interest in the form of additional
obligations could, under special tax rules, affect the amount, timing and
character of distributions to shareholders. For example, the Fund could be
required to take into account annually a portion of the discount (or deemed
discount) at which such securities were issued and to distribute such portion in
order to maintain its qualification as a regulated investment company. In such
case, the Fund may have to dispose of securities which it might otherwise have
continued to hold in order to generate cash to satisfy these distribution
requirements.
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Portfolio securities are purchased from and sold to parties acting as
either principal or agent. Newly-issued securities ordinarily are purchased
directly from the issuer or from an underwriter; other purchases and sales
usually are placed with those dealers from which it appears that the best price
or execution will be obtained. Usually no brokerage commissions, as such, are
paid by the Fund for such purchases and sales, although the price paid usually
includes an undisclosed compensation to the dealer acting as agent. The prices
paid to underwriters of newly-issued securities usually include a concession
paid by the issuer to the underwriter, and purchases of after-market securities
from dealers ordinarily are executed at a price between the bid and asked price.
No brokerage commissions have been paid by the Fund to date.
Transactions are allocated to various dealers by the Fund's portfolio
managers in their best judgment. The primary consideration is prompt and
effective execution of orders at the most favorable price. Subject to that
primary consideration, dealers may be selected for research, statistical or
other services to enable the Manager to supplement its own research and analysis
with the views and information of other securities firms and may be selected
based upon their sales of shares of the Fund or other funds advised by the
Manager or its affiliates.
Research services furnished by brokers through which the Fund effects
securities transactions may be used by the Manager in advising other funds it
advises and, conversely, research services furnished to the Manager by brokers
in connection with other funds the Manager advises may be used by the Manager in
advising the Fund. Although it is not possible to place a dollar value on these
services, it is the Manager's opinion that the receipt and study of such
services should not reduce the expenses of its research department.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
The Fund's current yield for the 30-day period ended September 30, 1999
was 4.88%. Current yield is computed pursuant to a formula which operates as
follows: the amount of the Fund's expenses accrued for the 30-day period (net of
reimbursements) is subtracted from the amount of the dividends and interest
earned (computed in accordance with regulatory requirements) by the Fund during
the period. That result is then divided by the product of: (a) the average daily
number of shares outstanding during the period that were entitled to receive
dividends and distributions, and (b) the net asset value per share on the last
day of the period less any undistributed earned income per share reasonably
expected to be declared as a dividend shortly thereafter. The quotient is then
added to 1, and that sum is raised to the 6th power, after which 1 is
subtracted. The current yield is then arrived at by multiplying the result by 2.
Based upon a combined 1999 Federal and State of California effective tax
rate of 45.22%, the Fund's tax equivalent yield for the 30-day period ended
September 30, 1999 was 8.91%. Tax equivalent yield is computed by dividing that
portion of the current yield (calculated as described above) which is tax exempt
by 1 minus a stated tax rate and adding the quotient to that portion, if any, of
the yield of the Fund that is not tax exempt.
The tax equivalent yield quoted above represents the application of the
highest Federal and State of California marginal personal tax rates presently in
effect. For Federal personal income tax purposes, a 39.60% tax rate has been
used. For California personal income tax purposes, a 9.30% tax rate has been
used. The tax equivalent figure, however, does not include the potential effect
of any local (including, but not limited to, county, district or city) taxes,
including applicable surcharges. In addition, there may be pending legislation
which could affect such stated tax rates or yields. Each investor should consult
its tax adviser, consider its own factual circumstances and applicable tax laws,
in order to ascertain the relevant tax equivalent yield.
The Fund's average annual total return for the 1, 5 and 9.98 year periods
ended September 30, 1999 was -3.62%, 5.96% and 6.79%, respectively. Average
annual total return is calculated by determining the ending redeemable value of
an investment purchased with a hypothetical $1,000 payment made at the beginning
of the period (assuming the reinvestment of dividends and distributions),
dividing by the amount of the initial investment, taking the "n"th root of the
quotient (where "n" is the number of years in the period) and subtracting 1 from
the result.
The Fund's aggregate total return for the period October 10, 1989
(commencement of operations) through September 30, 1999 was 92.54%. Total return
is calculated by subtracting the amount of the Fund's net asset value per share
at the beginning of a stated period from the net asset value per share at the
end of the period (after giving effect to the reinvestment of dividends and
distributions during the period), and dividing the result by the net asset value
per share at the beginning of the period.
From time to time, the Fund may use hypothetical tax equivalent yields or
charts in its advertising. These hypothetical yields or charts will be used for
illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of the Fund's past or future
performance.
Comparative performance information may be used from time to time in
advertising or marketing the Fund's shares, including data from Lipper
Analytical Services, Inc., Moody's Bond Survey Bond Index, Lehman Brothers
Municipal Bond Index, Morningstar, Inc. and other industry publications. From
time to time, advertising materials for the Fund may refer to or discuss
then-current or past economic conditions, developments and/or events, actual or
proposed tax legislation, or to statistical or other information concerning
trends relating to investment companies, as compiled by industry associations
such as the Investment Company Institute. From time to time, advertising
materials for the Fund also may refer to Morningstar ratings and related
analyses supporting such ratings.
From time to time, advertising material for the Fund may include
biographical information relating to its portfolio manager and may refer to, or
include commentary by the portfolio manager relating to investment strategy,
asset growth, current or past business, political, economic or financial
conditions and other matters of general interest to investors.
From time to time, advertising materials may refer to studies performed by
the Manager Corporation or its affiliates, such as "The Dreyfus Tax Informed
Investing Study" or "The Dreyfus Gender Investment Comparison Study (1996 &
1997)" or such other studies.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUND
Each Fund share has one vote and, when issued and paid for in accordance
with the terms of the offering, is fully paid and non-assessable. Fund shares
are of one class and have equal rights as to dividends and in liquidation.
Shares have no preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and are freely
transferable.
Unless otherwise required by the 1940 Act, ordinarily it will not be
necessary for the Fund to hold annual meetings of shareholders. As a result,
Fund shareholders may not consider each year the election of Board members or
the appointment of auditors. However, the holders of at least 10% of the shares
outstanding and entitled to vote may require the Fund to hold a special meeting
of shareholders for purposes of removing a Board member from office. Fund
shareholders may remove a Board member by the affirmative vote of a majority of
the Fund's outstanding voting shares. In addition, the Board will call a meeting
of shareholders for the purpose of electing Board members if, at any time, less
than a majority of the Board members then holding office have been elected by
shareholders.
The Fund is intended to be a long-term investment vehicle and is not
designed to provide investors with a means of speculating on short-term market
movements. A pattern of frequent purchases and exchanges can be disruptive to
efficient portfolio management and, consequently, can be detrimental to the
Fund's performance and its shareholders. Accordingly, if the Fund's management
determines that an investor is following a market-timing strategy or is
otherwise engaging in excessive trading, the Fund, with or without prior notice,
may temporarily or permanently terminate the availability of Fund Exchanges, or
reject in whole or part any purchase or exchange request, with respect to such
investor's account. Such investors also may be barred from purchasing other
funds in the Dreyfus Family of Funds. Generally, an investor who makes more than
four exchanges out of the Fund during any calendar year or who makes exchanges
that appear to coincide with a market-timing strategy may be deemed to be
engaged in excessive trading. Accounts under common ownership or control will be
considered as one account for purposes of determining a pattern of excessive
trading. In addition, the Fund may refuse or restrict purchase or exchange
requests by any person or group if, in the judgment of the Fund's management,
the Fund would be unable to invest the money effectively in accordance with its
investment objective and policies or could otherwise be adversely affected or if
the Fund receives or anticipates receiving simultaneous orders that may
significantly affect the Fund (e.g., amounts equal to 1% or more of the Fund's
total assets). If an exchange request is refused, the Fund will take no other
action with respect to the shares until it receives further instructions from
the investor. The Fund may delay forwarding redemption proceeds for up to seven
days if the investor redeeming shares is engaged in excessive trading or if the
amount of the redemption request otherwise would be disruptive to efficient
portfolio management or would adversely affect the Fund. The Fund's policy on
excessive trading applies to investors who invest in the Fund directly or
through financial intermediaries, but does not apply to the Dreyfus
Auto-Exchange Privilege, to any automatic investment or withdrawal privilege
described herein, or to participants in employer-sponsored retirement plans.
During times of drastic economic or market conditions, the Fund may
suspend Fund Exchanges temporarily without notice and treat exchange requests
based on their separate components -- redemption orders with a simultaneous
request to purchase the other fund's shares. In such a case, the redemption
request would be processed at the Fund's next determined net asset value but the
purchase order would be effective only at the net asset value next determined
after the fund being purchased receives the proceeds of the redemption, which
may result in the purchase being delayed.
The Fund sends annual and semi-annual financial statements to all its
shareholders.
COUNSEL AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 180 Maiden Lane, New York, New York
10038-4982, as counsel for the Fund, has rendered its opinion as to certain
legal matters regarding the due authorization and valid issuance of the shares
being sold pursuant to the Fund's Prospectus.
Ernst & Young LLP, 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019,
independent auditors, have been selected as independent auditors of the Fund.
APPENDIX A
INVESTING IN CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS
RISK FACTORS - INVESTING IN CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS
The following information is a summary of special factors affecting
investments in California Municipal Obligations. It does not purport to be a
complete description and is based on information drawn from the Official
Statement issued by the State of California (the "State") for its public bond
issue on December 1, 1999. While the Fund has not independently verified this
information, it has no reason to believe that such information is not correct in
all material respects.
State Finances
The Budget Process
The State's fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. The State
operates on a budget basis, using a modified accrual system of accounting, with
revenues credited in the period in which they are measurable and available and
expenditures debited in the period in which the corresponding liabilities are
incurred.
The annual budget is proposed by the Governor by January 10 of each year
for the next fiscal year (the "Governor's Budget"). Under State law, the annual
proposed Governor's Budget cannot provide for projected expenditures in excess
of projected revenues and balances available from prior fiscal years. Following
the submission of the Governor's Budget, the Legislature takes up the proposal.
Under the State Constitution, money may be drawn from the Treasury only
through an appropriation made by law. The primary source of the annual
expenditure authorizations is the Budget Act as approved by the Legislature and
signed by the Governor. The Budget Act must be approved by a two-thirds majority
vote of each House of the Legislature. The Governor may reduce or eliminate
specific line items in the Budget Act or any other appropriations bill without
vetoing the entire bill. Such individual line-item vetoes are subject to
override by a two-thirds majority vote of each House of the Legislature.
Appropriations also may be included in legislation other than the Budget
Act. Bills containing appropriations (except for K-12 and community college
("K-14") education) must be approved by a two-thirds majority vote in each House
of the Legislature and be signed by the Governor. Bills containing K-14
education appropriations require a simple majority vote. Continuing
appropriations, available without regard to fiscal year, also may be provided by
statute or the State Constitution. There is litigation pending concerning the
validity of such continuing appropriations. See "Litigation" below.
Funds necessary to meet an appropriation need not be in the State
Treasury at the time such appropriation is enacted; revenues may be appropriated
in anticipation of their receipt.
The General Fund
The moneys of the State are segregated into the General Fund and over 900
special funds, including bond, trust and pension funds. The General Fund
consists of revenues received by the State Treasury and not required by law to
be credited to any other fund, as well as earnings from the investment of State
moneys not allocable to another fund. The General Fund is the principal
operating fund for the majority of governmental activities and is the depository
of most of the major revenue sources of the State. The General Fund may be
expended as a consequence of appropriation measures enacted by the Legislature
and approved by the Governor, as well as appropriations pursuant to various
constitutional authorizations and initiative statutes.
The Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties
The Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties ("SFEU") is funded with
General Fund revenues and was established to protect the State from unforeseen
revenue reductions and/or unanticipated expenditure increases. Amounts in the
SFEU may be transferred by the State Controller as necessary to meet cash needs
of the General Fund. The State Controller is required to return moneys so
transferred without payment of interest as soon as there are sufficient moneys
in the General Fund. At the time of signing of the 1999 Budget Act, on June 29,
1999, the Department of Finance projected the SFEU would have a balance of about
$1.932 billion at June 30, 1999, compared to the original budgeted amount of
$1.1 billion. The 1999 Budget Act projects a balance in the SFEU of $880 million
at June 30, 2000. See "Current State Budget" below.
Inter-Fund Borrowings
Inter-fund borrowing has been used for many years to meet temporary
imbalances of receipts and disbursements in the General Fund. As of June 30,
1999, the General Fund had no outstanding loans from the SFEU, General Fund
special accounts or other special funds. At the November 1998 election, voters
approved Proposition 2. This proposition requires the General Fund to repay
loans made from certain transportation special accounts (such as the State
Highway Account) at least once per fiscal year, or up to 30 days after adoption
of the annual budget act. Since the General Fund may reborrow from the
transportation accounts soon after the annual repayment is made, the proposition
is not expected to have any adverse impact on the State's cash flow.
Welfare Reform
Congress passed and the President signed (on August 22, 1996) the
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (P.L.
104-193, the "Welfare Reform Law") fundamentally reforming the nation's welfare
system. Among its many provisions, the Welfare Reform Law includes: (1)
conversion of Aid to Families with Dependent Children from an entitlement
program to a block grant titled Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF),
with time limits on TANF recipients, work requirements and other changes; (ii)
provisions denying certain federal welfare and public benefits to legal
noncitizens (this provision has been amended by subsequent federal law),
allowing states to elect to deny additional benefits (including TANF) to legal
noncitizens, and generally denying almost all benefits to illegal immigrants;
and (iii) changes in the Food Stamp program, including reducing maximum benefits
and imposing work requirements.
California's response to the federal welfare reforms is embodied in
Chapter 270, Statutes of 1997 and is called California Work Opportunity and
Responsibility to Kids ("CalWORKs"), which replaced the former Aid to Families
with Dependent Children (AFDC) and Greater Avenues to Independence (GAIN)
programs, effective January 1, 1998. Consistent with the Welfare Reform Law,
CalWORKs contains new time limits on receipt of welfare aid, both lifetime as
well as for any current period on aid. The centerpiece of CalWORKs is the
linkage of eligibility to work participation requirements. Administration of the
new CalWORKs program is largely at the county level, and counties are given
financial incentives for success in this program.
The long-term impact of the Welfare Reform Law and CalWORKs cannot be
determined until there has been more experience and until an independent
evaluation of the CalWORKs program is completed. In the short-term, the
implementation of the CalWORKs program has continued the trend of declining
welfare caseloads. The CalWORKs caseload trend is projected to have been 646,000
in 1998-99 and to be 602,000 in 1999-00, down from a high of 921,000 cases in
1994-95.
The 1999 Budget Act proposes expenditures which will continue to meet,
but not exceed, the federally-required $2.9 billion combined State and county
maintenance-of-effort requirement. Total CalWORKs-related expenditures are
estimated to be $7.3 billion for 1998-99 and $7.3 billion for 1999-00, including
child care transfer amounts for the Department of Education.
Local Governments
The primary units of local government in California are the counties,
ranging in population from 1,200 in Alpine County to over 9,600,000 in Los
Angeles County. Counties are responsible for the provision of many basic
services, including indigent health care, welfare, jails and public safety in
unincorporated areas. There also are about 470 incorporated cities and thousands
of special districts formed for education, utility and other services. The
fiscal condition of local governments has been constrained since the enactment
of "Proposition 13" in 1978, which reduced and limited the future growth of
property taxes and limited the ability of local governments to impose "special
taxes" (those devoted to a specific purpose) without two-thirds voter approval.
Counties, in particular, have had fewer options to raise revenues than many
other local government entities, and have been required to maintain many
services.
In the aftermath of Proposition 13, the State provided aid to local
governments from the General Fund to make up some of the loss of property tax
moneys, including taking over the principal responsibility for funding K-12
schools and community colleges. During the recession, the Legislature eliminated
most of the remaining components of post-Proposition 13 aid to local government
entities other than K-14 education districts by requiring cities and counties to
transfer some of their property tax revenues to school districts. However, the
Legislature also provided additional funding sources (such as sales taxes) and
reduced certain mandates for local services. Since then, the State also has
provided additional funding to counties and cities through such programs as
health and welfare realignment, welfare reform, trial court restructuring, the
COPs program supporting local public safety departments, and various other
measures.
The 1999 Budget Act includes a $150 million one-time subvention from the
General Fund to local agencies for relief from the 1992 and 1993 property tax
shifts. Legislation has been passed, subject to voter approval at the election
in November 2000, to provide a more permanent payment to local governments to
offset the property tax shift. In addition, legislation was enacted in 1999 to
provide annually up to $50 million relief to cities based on 1997-98 costs of
jail booking and processing fees paid to counties.
Historically, funding for the State's trial court system was divided
between the State and the counties. However, Chapter 850, Statutes of 1997,
implemented a restructuring of the State's trial court funding system. Funding
for the courts, with the exception of costs for facilities, local judicial
benefits, and revenue collection, was consolidated at the State level. The
county contribution for both their general fund and fine and penalty amounts is
capped at the 1994-95 level and becomes part of the Trial Court Trust Fund,
which supports all trial court operations. The State assumed responsibility for
future growth in trial court funding. The consolidation of funding is intended
to streamline the operation of the courts, provide a dedicated revenue source,
and relieve fiscal pressure on the counties. Beginning in 1998-99, the county
general fund contribution for court operations is reduced by $300 million, and
cities will retain $62 million in fine and penalty revenue previously remitted
to the State. The General Fund reimbursed the $362 million revenue loss to the
Trial Court Trust Fund. The 1999 Budget Act includes funds to further reduce the
county General Fund contribution by an additional $96 million by reducing by 100
percent the contributions of the next 18 smallest counties and by 10 percent the
General Fund contribution of the remaining 21 counties.
The entire statewide welfare system has been changed in response to the
change in federal welfare law enacted in 1996 (see "Welfare Reform" above).
Under the CalWORKs program, counties are given flexibility to develop their own
plans, consistent with State law, to implement the program and to administer
many of its elements, and their costs for administrative and supportive services
are capped at the 1996-97 levels. Counties also are given financial incentives
if, at the individual county level or statewide, the CalWORKs program produces
savings associated with specified standards. Counties will still be required to
provide "general assistance" aid to certain persons who cannot obtain welfare
from other programs.
In 1996, voters approved Proposition 218, entitled the "Right to Vote on
Taxes Act," which incorporates new Articles XIII C and XIII D into the
California Constitution. These new provisions place limitations on the ability
of local government agencies to impose or raise various taxes, fees, charges and
assessments without voter approval. Certain "general taxes" imposed after
January 1, 1995 must be approved by voters in order to remain in effect. In
addition, Article XIII C clarifies the right of local voters to reduce taxes,
fees, assessments or charges through local initiatives. Proposition 218 does not
affect the State or its ability to levy or collect taxes.
State Appropriations Limit
The State is subject to an annual appropriations limit imposed by Article
XIII B of the State Constitution (the "Appropriations Limit"). The
Appropriations Limit does not restrict appropriations to pay debt service on
voter-authorized bonds.
Article XIII B prohibits the State from spending "appropriations subject
to limitation" in excess of the Appropriations Limit. "Appropriations subject to
limitation," with respect to the State, are authorizations to spend "proceeds of
taxes," which consist of tax revenues, and certain other funds, including
proceeds from regulatory licenses, user charges or other fees to the extent that
such proceeds exceed "the cost reasonably borne by that entity in providing the
regulation, product or service," but "proceeds of taxes" exclude most state
subventions to local governments, tax refunds and some benefit payments such as
unemployment insurance. No limit is imposed on appropriations of funds which are
not "proceeds of taxes," such as reasonable user charges or fees and certain
other non-tax funds.
Not included in the Appropriations Limit are appropriations for the debt
service costs of bonds existing or authorized by January 1, 1979, or
subsequently authorized by the voters, appropriations required to comply with
mandates of courts or the federal government, appropriations for qualified
capital outlay projects, appropriations of revenues derived from any increase in
gasoline taxes and motor vehicle weight fees above January 1, 1990 levels, and
appropriation of certain special taxes imposed by initiative (e.g., cigarette
and tobacco taxes). The Appropriations Limit may be exceeded in cases of
emergency.
The State's Appropriations Limit in each year is based on the limit for
the prior year, adjusted annually for changes in state per capita personal
income and changes in population, and adjusted, when applicable, for any
transfer of financial responsibility of providing services to or from another
unit of government or any transfer of the financial source for the provisions of
services from tax proceeds to non tax proceeds. The measurement of change in
population is a blended average of statewide overall population growth, and
change in attendance at local K-14 school districts. The Appropriations Limit is
tested over consecutive two-year periods. Any excess of the aggregate "proceeds
of taxes" received over such two-year period above the combined Appropriations
Limits for those two years is divided equally between transfers to K-14 school
districts and refunds to taxpayers.
The Legislature has enacted legislation to implement Article XIII B which
defines certain terms used in Article XIII B and sets forth the methods for
determining the Appropriations Limit. California Government Code Section 7912
requires an estimate of the Appropriations Limit to be included in the
Governor's Budget, and thereafter to be subject to the budget process and
established in the Budget Act.
The following table shows the State's Appropriations Limit for the past
four fiscal years and the current fiscal year. As of the enactment of the
1999-2000 Budget, the Department of Finance projects the State's Appropriations
Subject to Limitations will be $6.1 billion under the State's Appropriations
Limit in Fiscal Year 1999-00.
State Appropriations Limit
(Millions)
Fiscal Years
1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99* 1999-00*
State Appropriations Limit $39,309 $42,002 $44,778 $47,573 $50,673
Appropriations Subject to (34,186) (35,103) (40,743) (42,674) (44,528)
Limit -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Amount (Over)/Under Limit $5,123 $6,899 $4,035 $4,899 $6,145
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
- ---------------------
* Estimated/Projected
SOURCE: State of California, Department of Finance.
Proposition 98
On November 8, 1988, voters of the State approved Proposition 98, a
combined initiative constitutional amendment and statute called the "Classroom
Instructional Improvement and Accountability Act." Proposition 98 changed State
funding of public education below the university level and the operation of the
State Appropriations Limit, primarily by guaranteeing K-14 schools a minimum
share of General Fund revenues. Under Proposition 98 (as modified by Proposition
111, which was enacted on June 5, 1990), K-14 schools are guaranteed the greater
of (a) in general, a fixed percent of General Fund revenues ("Test 1"), (b) the
amount appropriated to K-14 schools in the prior year, adjusted for changes in
the cost of living (measured as in Article XIII B by reference to State per
capita personal income) and enrollment ("Test 2"), or (c) a third test, which
would replace Test 2 in any year when the percentage growth in per capita
General Fund revenues from the prior year plus one half of one percent is less
than the percentage growth in State per capita personal income ("Test 3"). Under
Test 3, schools would receive the amount appropriated in the prior year adjusted
for changes in enrollment and per capita General Fund revenues, plus an
additional small adjustment factor. If Test 3 is used in any year, the
difference between Test 3 and Test 2 would become a "credit" to schools which
would be the basis of payments in future years when per capita General Fund
revenue growth exceeds per capita personal income growth. Legislation adopted
prior to the end of the 1988-89 Fiscal Year, implementing Proposition 98,
determined the K-14 schools' funding guarantee under Test 1 to be 40.3 percent
of the General Fund tax revenues, based on 1986-87 appropriations. However, that
percent has been adjusted to approximately 35 percent to account for a
subsequent redirection of local property taxes, since such redirection directly
affects the share of General Fund revenues to schools.
Proposition 98 permits the Legislature by two-thirds vote of both Houses,
with the Governor's concurrence, to suspend the K-14 schools' minimum funding
formula for a one-year period. Proposition 98 also contains provisions
transferring certain State tax revenues in excess of the Article XIII B limit to
K-14 schools. See "State Finances--State Appropriations Limit" above.
During the recession in the early 1990s, General Fund revenues for
several years were less than originally projected, so that the original
Proposition 98 appropriations turned out to be higher than the minimum
percentage provided in the law. The Legislature responded to these developments
by designating the "extra" Proposition 98 payments in one year as a "loan" from
future years' Proposition 98 entitlements, and also intended that the "extra"
payments would not be included in the Proposition 98 "base" for calculating
future years' entitlements. By implementing these actions, per-pupil funding
from Proposition 98 sources stayed almost constant at approximately $4,200 from
Fiscal Year 1991-92 to Fiscal Year 1993-94.
In 1992, a lawsuit was filed, California Teachers' Association v. Gould,
which challenged the validity of these off-budget loans. The settlement of this
case, finalized in July 1996, provides, among other things, that both the State
and K-14 schools share in the repayment of prior years' emergency loans to
schools. Of the total $1.76 billion in loans, the State is repaying $935 million
by forgiveness of the amount owed, while schools will repay $825 million. The
State share of the repayment will be reflected as an appropriation above the
current Proposition 98 base calculation. The schools' share of the repayment
will count as appropriations that count toward satisfying the Proposition 98
guarantee, or from "below" the current base. Repayments are spread over the
eight-year period of 1994-95 through 2001-02 to mitigate any adverse fiscal
impact.
Substantially increased General Fund revenues, above initial budget
projections, in the fiscal years 1994-95 through 1998-99 have resulted in
retroactive increases in Proposition 98 appropriations from subsequent fiscal
years' budgets. Because of the State's increasing revenues, per-pupil funding at
the K-12 level has increased by about 44 percent from the level in place from
1991-92 through 1993-94. A significant amount of the "extra" Proposition 98
monies in the last few years has been allocated to special programs,
particularly an initiative to allow each classroom with respect to grades K-3 to
have no more than 20 pupils by the end of the 1997-98 school year. Since the
State expects General Fund revenue growth to continue in 1999-00, there also are
new initiatives to increase school safety, improve schools' accountability for
pupil performance, provide additional textbooks to schools, fund deferred
maintenance projects, increase beginning teacher's salaries and provide
performance incentives to teachers. See "Current State Budget" for further
discussion of education funding.
Prior Fiscal Years' Financial Results
The State's financial condition improved markedly during the fiscal years
starting in 1995-96, with a combination of better than expected revenues,
slowdown in growth of social welfare programs, and continued spending restraint
based on actions taken in earlier years. The State's cash position also
improved, and no external deficit borrowing occurred over the end of the last
four fiscal years. The last borrowing to spread out the repayment of a budget
deficit over the end of a fiscal year was $4.0 billion of revenue anticipation
warrants issued in July 1994 and which matured in April 1996.
The State economy grew strongly during the fiscal years beginning in
1995-96 and, as a result, the General Fund took in substantially greater tax
revenues (around $2.2 billion in 1995-96, $1.6 billion in 1996-97 and $2.4
billion in 1997-98 and $1.0 billion in 1998-99) than were initially planned when
the budgets were enacted. The accumulated budget deficit from the recession
years was finally eliminated with the repayment of the revenue anticipation
warrants in April 1996. These additional funds were largely directed to school
spending as mandated by Proposition 98, to make up shortfalls from reduced
federal health and welfare aid in 1995-96 and 1996-97 and particularly in
1998-99 to fund new program incentives.
The following were major features of the 1998 Budget Act and certain
additional fiscal bills enacted before the end of the legislative session:
1. The most significant feature of the 1998-99 budget was agreement on a
total of $1.4 billion of tax cuts. The central element was a bill which provided
for a phased-in reduction of the Vehicle License Fee ("VLF"). Since the VLF is
transferred to cities and counties under existing law, the bill provided for the
General Fund to replace the lost revenues. Starting on January 1, 1999, the VLF
has been reduced by 25 percent, at a cost to the General Fund of approximately
$500 million in the 1998-99 Fiscal Year and about $1 billion annually
thereafter.
In addition to the cut in VLF, the 1998-99 budget included both temporary
and permanent increases in the personal income tax dependent credit ($612
million General Fund cost in 1998-99, but less in future years), a nonrefundable
renters tax credit ($133 million), and various targeted business tax credits
($106 million).
2. Proposition 98 funding for K-14 schools was increased by $1.7 billion
in General Fund moneys over revised 1997-98 levels, over $300 million higher
than the minimum Proposition 98 guarantee. Of the 1998-99 funds, major new
programs included money for instructional and library materials, deferred
maintenance, support for increasing the school year to 180 days and reduction of
class sizes in Grade 9. The Budget also included $250 million as repayment of
prior years' loans to schools, as part of the settlement of the California
Teachers' Association v. Gould lawsuit. See "State Finances - Proposition 98"
above.
3. Funding for higher education increased substantially above the actual
1997-98 level. General Fund support was increased by $340 million (15.6 percent)
for the University of California and $267 million (14.1 percent) for the
California State University system. In addition, Community Colleges funding
increased by $300 million (6.6 percent).
4. The Budget included increased funding for health, welfare and social
services programs. A 4.9 percent grant increase was included in the basic
welfare grants, the first increase in those grants in 9 years.
5. Funding for the judiciary and criminal justice programs increased by
about 11 percent over 1997-98, primarily to reflect increased State support for
local trial courts and rising prison population.
6. Major legislation enacted after the 1998 Budget Act included new
funding for resources projects, a share of the purchase of the Headwaters
Forest, funding for the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank ($50
million) and funding for the construction of local jails. The State realized
savings of $433 million from a reduction in the State's contribution to the
State Teacher's Retirement System in 1998-99.
The revised 1999-2000 Governor's Budget, released on May 14, 1999 (the
"1999 May Revision"), reported that stronger than expected economic conditions
in the State for the latter part of 1998 and into 1999 would produce total
1998-99 General Fund revenues of about $57.9 billion, almost $1.0 billion above
the 1998 Budget Act estimates and $1.6 billion above the initial estimates in
the January 1999-2000 Governor's Budget. The 1999 May Revision projected 1998-99
General Fund expenditures of $58.6 billion, about $400 million higher than the
January 1999-2000 Governor's Budget estimate. Some of this additional revenue
will be directed to K-14 schools pursuant to Proposition 98. The 1999 May
Revision projected a balance in the SFEU at June 30, 1999 of approximately $1.9
billion, $1.3 billion higher than estimated in January 1999.
Current State Budget
The discussion below of the 1999-00 Fiscal Year budget is based on the
State's estimates and projections of revenues and expenditures for the current
fiscal year and must not be construed as statements of fact. These estimates and
projections are based upon various assumptions as updated in the 1999 Budget
Act, which may be affected by numerous factors, including future economic
conditions in the State and the nation, and there can be no assurance that the
estimates will be achieved.
1999-2000 Fiscal Year Budget
On January 8, 1999, the Governor released a proposed budget for Fiscal
Year 1999-00 (the "January Governor's Budget"). The January Governor's Budget
generally reported that General Fund revenues for Fiscal Year 1998-99 and Fiscal
Year 1999-00 would be lower than earlier projections (primarily due to weaker
overseas economic conditions perceived in late 1998), while some caseloads would
be higher than earlier projections. The January Governor's Budget proposed $60.5
billion of General Fund expenditures in Fiscal Year 1999-00, with a $415 million
SFEU reserve at June 30, 2000.
The 1999 May Revision showed an additional $4.3 billion of revenues for
combined fiscal years 1998-99 and 1999-00. The final Budget Bill was adopted by
the Legislature on June 16, 1999, and was signed by the Governor on June 29,
1999 (the "1999 Budget Act"), meeting the Constitutional deadline for budget
enactment for only the second time in the 1990's.
The final 1999 Budget Act estimated General Fund revenues and transfers
of $63.0 billion, and contained expenditures totaling $63.7 billion after the
Governor used the line-item veto to reduce the legislative Budget Bill
expenditures by $581 million (both General Fund and Special Fund). The 1999
Budget Act also contained expenditures of $16.1 billion from special funds and
$1.5 billion from bond funds. The Administration estimated that the SFEU would
have a balance at June 30, 2000, of about $880 million. Not included in this
amount was an additional $300 million which (after the Governor's vetoes) was
"set aside" to provide funds for employee salary increases (to be negotiated in
bargaining with employee unions), and for litigation reserves. The 1999 Budget
Act anticipates normal cash flow borrowing during the fiscal year.
The principal features of the 1999 Budget Act include the following:
1. Proposition 98 funding for K-12 schools was increased by $1.6 billion
in General Fund moneys over revised 1998-99 levels, $108.6 million higher than
the minimum Proposition 98 guarantee. Of the 1999-00 funds, major new programs
included money for reading improvement, new textbooks, school safety, improving
teacher quality, funding teacher bonuses, providing greater accountability for
school performance, increasing preschool and after school care programs and
funding deferred maintenance of school facilities. The Budget also includes $310
million as repayment of prior years' loans to schools, as part of the settlement
of the California Teachers' Association v. Gould lawsuit. See also "State
Finances - Proposition 98" above.
2. Funding for higher education increased substantially above the actual
1998-99 level. General Fund support was increased by $184 million (7.3 percent)
for the University of California and $126 million (5.9 percent) for the
California State University system. In addition, Community Colleges funding
increased by $324.3 million (6.6 percent). As a result, undergraduate fees at UC
and CSU will be reduced for the second consecutive year, and the per-unit charge
at Community Colleges will be reduced by $1.
3. The Budget included increased funding of nearly $600 million for
health and human services.
4. About $800 million from the General Fund will be directed toward
infrastructure costs, including $425 million in additional funding for the
Infrastructure Bank, initial planning costs for a new prison in the Central
Valley, additional equipment for train and ferry service, and payment of
deferred maintenance for state parks.
5. The Legislature enacted a one-year additional reduction of 10 percent
of the VLF for calendar year 2000, at a General Fund cost of about $250 million
in each of Fiscal Year 1999-00 and Fiscal Year 2000-01 to make up lost funding
to local governments. Conversion of this one-time reduction to a permanent cut
will remain subject to the revenue tests in the legislation adopted last year.
Several other targeted tax cuts, primarily for businesses, also were approved at
a cost of $54 million in Fiscal Year 1999-00.
6. A one-time appropriation of $150 million, to be split between cities
and counties, was made to offset property tax shifts during the early 1990's.
Additionally, an ongoing $50 million was appropriated as a subvention to cities
for jail booking or processing fees charged by counties when an individual
arrested by city personnel is taken to a county detention facility.
Economy and Population
Introduction
California's economy, the largest among the 50 states and one of the
largest in the world, has major components in high technology, trade,
entertainment, agriculture, manufacturing, tourism, construction and services.
Since 1994, California's economy has been performing strongly after suffering a
deep recession between 1990-94.
Population and Labor Force
The State's July 1, 1998 population of over 33.4 million represented over
12 percent of the total United States population.
California's population is concentrated in metropolitan areas. As of the
April 1, 1990 census, 96 percent resided in the 23 Metropolitan Statistical
Areas in the State. As of July 1, 1998, the 5-county Los Angeles area accounted
for 49 percent of the State's population, with over 16.0 million residents, and
the 10-county San Francisco Bay Area represented 21 percent, with a population
of over 7.0 million.
The following table shows California's population data for 1994 through
1998.
Population 1994-98
% Increase % Increase
Over Over California
California Preceding United States Preceding as % of
Year Population(a) Year Population(a) Year United
States
1994 31,790,000 0.9 260,292,000 1.0 12.2
1995 32,063,000 0.9 262,761,000 0.9 12.2
1996 32,383,000 1.0 265,179,000 0.9 12.2
1997 32,957,000 1.8 267,636,000 0.9 12.3
1998 33,494,000 1.6 270,029,000 0.9 12.4
- --------------
(a) Population as of July 1.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; State of
California, Department of Finance.
The following table presents civilian labor force data for the resident
population, age 16 and over, for the years 1993 to 1998.
Labor Force
1993-98
Labor Force Trends (Thousands) Unemployment Rate (%)
Labor United
Year Force Employment California States
1993 15,359 13,918 9.4 6.9
1994 15,450 14,122 8.6 6.1
1995 15,412 14,203 7.8 5.6
1996 15,511 14,391 7.2 5.4
1997 15,941 14,937 6.3 4.9
1998 16,330 15,361 5.9 4.5
- -----------------
SOURCE: State of California, Employment Development Department.
<PAGE>
Employment, Income, Construction and Export Growth
The following table shows California's nonagricultural employment
distribution and growth for 1990 and 1998.
Payroll Employment By Major Sector
1990 and 1998
Employment % Distribution
(Thousands) of
Employment
Industry Sector 1990 1998 1990 1998
Mining................ 39 25 0.3 0.2
Construction.......... 605 602 4.8 4.4
Manufacturing.........
Nondurable Goods... 721 729 5.7 5.4
High Technology.... 686 534 5.4 3.9
Other Durable goods 690 697 5.4 5.1
Transportation and 624 694 4.9 5.1
Utilities.............
Wholesale and Retail 3,002 3,122 23.7 23.0
Trade
Finance, Insurance
and Real Estate.... 825 798 6.5 5.9
Services.............. 3,395 4,220 26.8 31.1
Government
Federal............ 362 269 2.9 2.0
State and Local.... 1,713 1,894 13.5 13.9
TOTAL ------ ------- -------- -------
NONAGRICULTURAL.... 12,662 13,584 100 100
====== ======= ======== =======
SOURCE: State of California, Employment Development Department and State of
California, Department of Finance.
The following tables show California's total and per capita income
patterns for selected years.
Total Personal Income 1993-98
California
California
% of
Year Millions % Change U.S.
1993 $698,130 2.0* 12.8
1994a 718,321 2.9 12.5
1995 754,269 5.0 12.4
1996 798,020 5.8 12.5
1997 846,017 6.0 12.5
1998b 904,444 6.9 12.7
* Change from prior year.
a Reflects Northridge earthquake, which caused an estimated $15 billion drop in
personal income.
b Estimated by the State of California, Department of Finance.
Note: Omits income for government employees overseas.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Per Capita Personal Income 1993-98
California
United % of
Year California % Change States % Change U.S.
1993................ $22,388 1.0* $21,220 3.3* 105.5
1994a............... 22,899 2.3 22,056 3.9 103.8
1995................ 23,901 4.4 23,063 4.6 103.6
1996................ 25,050 4.8 24,169 4.8 103.6
1997................ 26,218 4.7 25,298 4.7 103.6
1998................ 27,116b 3.4 26,368c 4.2 102.8
* Change from prior year
a Reflects Northridge earthquake, which caused an estimated $15 billion drop in
personal income.
b Estimated by the State of California, Department of Finance.
c Estimated by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
<PAGE>
Litigation
The State is a party to numerous legal proceedings. The following are the
more significant lawsuits pending against the State, as reported by the Office
of the Attorney General.
On December 24, 1997, a consortium of California counties filed a test
claim with the Commission on State Mandates asking the Commission on State
Mandates to determine whether the property tax shift from counties to school
districts beginning in 1993-94 is a reimbursable state mandated cost. See "State
Finances - Local Governments" above. The test claim was heard on October 29,
1998, and the Commission on State Mandates found in favor of the State. In March
1999, Sonoma County filed suit in the Superior Court to overturn the Commission
on State Mandate's decision. In October 1999, a Sonoma County Superior Court
Judge ruled in favor of the County. The State will continue to contest this
lawsuit. Should the courts ultimately find in favor of the counties, the impact
to the State General Fund could be as high as $10.0 billion. In addition, there
would be an annual Proposition 98 General Fund cost of at least $3.75 billion.
This cost would grow in accordance with the annual assessed value growth rate.
On June 24, 1998, plaintiffs in Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association et
al. v. Kathleen Connell filed a complaint for certain declaratory and injunctive
relief challenging the authority of the State Controller to make payments from
the State Treasury in the absence of a state budget. On July 21, 1998, the trial
court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the State Controller from
paying moneys from the State Treasury for fiscal year 1998-99, with certain
limited exceptions, in the absence of a state budget. The preliminary
injunction, among other things, prohibited the State Controller from making any
payments pursuant to any continuing appropriation. On July 22 and 27, 1998,
various employee unions which had intervened in the case appealed the trial
court's preliminary injunction and asked the Court of Appeal to stay the
preliminary injunction. On July 28, 1998, the Court of Appeal granted the
unions' requests and stayed the preliminary injunction pending the Court of
Appeal's decision on the merits of the appeal. On August 5, 1998, the Court of
Appeal denied the plaintiffs' request to reconsider the stay. Also on July 22,
1998, the State Controller asked the California Supreme Court to immediately
stay the trial court's preliminary injunction and to overrule the order granting
the preliminary injunction on the merits. On July 29, 1998, the Supreme Court
transferred the State Controller's request to the Court of Appeal. The matters
are now pending before the Court of Appeal. Briefs have been submitted; no date
has yet been set for oral argument.
The State is involved in a lawsuit, Thomas Hayes v. Commission on State
Mandates, related to state-mandated costs. The action involves an appeal by the
Director of Finance from a 1984 decision by the State Board of Control (now
succeeded by the Commission on State Mandates (COSM)). The Board of Control
decided in favor of local school districts' claims for reimbursement for special
education programs for handicapped students. The case then was brought to the
trial court by the State and later remanded to the COSM for redetermination. The
COSM since has expanded the claim to include supplemental claims filed by
several other institutions. To date, the Legislature has not appropriated funds.
The liability to the State, if all potentially eligible school districts pursue
timely claims, has been estimated by the Department of Finance at more than $1
billion. The Commission on State Mandates issued a decision in December 1998
determining that a small number of components of the State's special education
program are state mandated local costs. The administrative proceeding is in the
"parameters and guidelines" stage where the commission is considering whether
and to what extent the costs associated with the state mandated components of
the special education program are offset by funds that the State already
allocates to that program. The State's position is that all costs are offset by
existing funding. The State has the option to seek judicial review of the
mandate finding.
In Capitola Land v. Anderson and other related state and federal cases,
plaintiffs sought payments from the State under the AFDC-Foster Care program.
Judgment was rendered against the State in Capitola, which the State appealed
and lost. The State then filed a state plan amendment with the federal
Department of Health and Human Services ("DHHS") to enable the State to comply
with the Capitola ruling and receive federal funding. The DHHS denied the state
plan amendment, and the State has filed suit against DHHS. The State Legislature
enacted a statute that conditioned State compliance with the Capitola judgment
on receipt of federal funding (50% contribution). The State then refused to
implement the Capitola judgment based on the new statute. Certain plaintiffs
moved for an order of contempt against the State, which was granted by the trial
court, but was stayed and annulled by the Court of Appeal. The plaintiffs'
petition for review was denied by the California Supreme Court. However, the
State continues to pursue federal funding in federal court. If, as a result of
this litigation, compliance with the Capitola judgment is required and the
judgment is applied retroactively, liability to the State could exceed $200
million.
In January 1997, California experienced major flooding in six different
areas with preliminary estimates of property damage of approximately $1.6 to
$2.0 billion. A substantial number of plaintiffs have joined suit against the
State, local agencies, and private companies and contractors seeking
compensation for the damages they suffered as a result of the 1997 flooding. The
State is vigorously defending the action.
In Just Say No to Tobacco Dough Campaign v. State of California, the
petitioners challenge the appropriation of approximately $166 million of
Proposition 99 funds in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund for years
ended June 30, 1990, through June 30, 1995, for related disease research. If the
State loses, the General Fund and funds from other sources would be used to
reimburse the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund, an agency fund, for
approximately $166 million. However, the superior court issued an order in
December 1998 granting the State's demurrer to the entire action and dismissing
the case. The superior court thereafter reconsidered its ruling and allowed
plaintiffs to amend their complaint. The State demurred to the amended
complaint. In July 1999, the court again sustained the State's demurrer to the
amended complaint and issued a judgment dismissing the case. Plaintiffs
appealed. The matter will be briefed and will be scheduled for oral argument
before the court.
The State is a defendant in Ceridian Corporation v. Franchise Tax Board,
a suit which challenges the validity of two sections of the California Tax Laws.
The first relates to deduction from corporate taxes for dividends received from
insurance companies to the extent the insurance companies have California
activities. The second relates to corporate deduction of dividends to the extent
the earnings of the dividend paying corporation have already been included in
the measure of their California tax. On August 13, 1998, the court issued a
judgment against the Franchise Tax Board on both issues. The Franchise Tax Board
has appealed the judgment. Briefing is underway. If both sections of the
California tax law are invalidated and all dividends become deductible, General
Fund collections in the future would be reduced annually in the $200-$250
million range for all taxpayers.
The State is involved in a lawsuit related to contamination at the
Stringfellow toxic waste site. In United States, People of the State of
California v. J.B. Stringfellow, Jr., et al., the State is seeking recovery for
past costs of cleanup of the site, a declaration that the defendants are jointly
and severally liable for future costs, and an injunction ordering completion of
the cleanup. However, the defendants have filed a counterclaim against the State
for alleged negligent acts, resulting in significant findings of liability
against the State as owner, operator, and generator of wastes taken to the site.
The State has appealed the rulings. Present estimates of the cleanup range from
$400 million to $600 million. Potential State liability falls within this same
range. However, all or a portion of any judgment against the State could be
satisfied by recoveries from the State's insurance carriers. The State has filed
a suit against certain of these carriers and trial is currently set for January
16, 2001.
The State is a defendant in a coordinated action involving 3,000
plaintiffs seeking recovery for damages caused by the Yuba River flood of
February 1986. The trial court found liability in inverse condemnation and
awarded damages of $500,000 to a sample of plaintiffs. The State's potential
liability to the remaining plaintiffs ranges from $800 million to $1.5 billion.
In 1992, the State and plaintiffs filed appeals. In August 1999, the Court of
Appeal issued a decision reversing the trial court's judgment against the State
and remanding the case for retrial on the inverse condemnation cause of action.
Plaintiffs have petitioned the California Supreme Court for review.
The State is a defendant in a statewide action, Emily Q., et al. v.
Belshe, et al., in which plaintiffs seek to compel a change in early screening
procedures for children with mental health needs. A preliminary injunction was
issued, requiring changes in the screening procedures. The Department of Health
Services, in conjunction with the Department of Mental Health, is in the process
of complying with the injunction. No hearing has been scheduled on the petition
for permanent injunction. The Department of Mental Health estimates the annual
cost to the State for implementation of a permanent injunction to be
approximately $13 million.
Plaintiffs in County of San Bernardino v. Barlow Respiratory Hospital and
related actions seek mandamus relief requiring the State to retroactively
increase out-patient Medi-Cal reimbursement rates. Plaintiffs have estimated the
damages to be several hundred million dollars. The State is vigorously defending
these cases, as well as related federal cases addressing the calculation of
Medi-Cal reimbursement rates in the future.
The State is involved in two refund actions, Cigarettes Cheaper!, et
al. v. Board of Equalization, et al. and California Assn. Of Retail
Tobacconists (CART), et al. v. Board of Equalization, et al., that challenge
the constitutionality of Proposition 10, approved by the voters in 1998.
Plaintiffs allege that Proposition 10, which increases the excise tax on
tobacco products, violates 11 sections of the California Constitution and
related provisions of law. Plaintiffs Cigarettes Cheaper! seek declaratory
and injunctive relief and a refund of over $4 million. The CART case filed
by retail tobacconists in San Diego seeks a refund of $5 million. The State
is vigorously contesting these cases. If the statute is declared
unconstitutional, exposure may include the entire $750 million collected
annually with interest.
The State is involved in two cases challenging the constitutionality of
the interest offset provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Plaintiffs in
F. W. Woolworth Co. and Kinney Shoe Corporation v. Franchise Tax Board seek a
refund of over $15 million. The Woolworth case was tried in July 1995 and
judgment was entered for the Franchise Tax Board. The judgment was upheld on
appeal and the plaintiffs' petition for review in the California Supreme Court
was denied. On June 7, 1999, plaintiffs filed a petition for writ of certiorari
in the United States Supreme Court. The Franchise Tax Board filed its opposition
to the petition for writ of certiorari on August 5, 1999.
Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board was tried in February 1997 with
judgment for the taxpayer. The judgment was reversed on appeal and plaintiffs
petition for review in the California Supreme Court was denied. On September 28,
1999, the United States Supreme Court granted the taxpayer's petition for writ
of certiorari. The Franchise Tax Board estimates that if the interest-offset
provisions are declared unconstitutional, the result would involve potential
reduction of state revenues in the $90 million range annually, with past year
collection and interest exposure of $500 million.
Guy F. Atkinson Company of California v. Franchise Tax Board is a
corporation tax refund action involving the solar energy system tax credit
provided for under the Revenue and Taxation Code. The case went to trial in May
1998 and the trial court entered judgment in favor of the Franchise Tax Board.
The taxpayer has filed an appeal to the California Court of Appeal and briefing
is due to be completed in October 1999. The Franchise Tax Board estimates that
the cost would be $150 million annually if the plaintiff prevails. Allowing
refunds for all open years would entail a refund of at least $500 million.
Jordan, et al. v. Department of Motor Vehicles, et al. and Josephs v.
Zolin, et al. challenge the validity of the Vehicle Smog Impact Fee, a $300 fee
which is collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles from vehicle registrants
when a vehicle without a California new-vehicle certification is first
registered in California. The Jordan plaintiffs contend that the fee violates
the interstate commerce and equal protection clauses of the United States
Constitution as well as Article XIX of the State Constitution. The Josephs case
is a class action civil rights case brought against the current and former
directors of the Department of Motor Vehicles in their individual capacities
claiming the collection of the Vehicle Smog Impact Fee violates the interstate
commerce, equal protection, and privileges and immunities clauses of the United
States Constitution. In October 1999, the Court of Appeals upheld a trial court
judgment for the plaintiffs in the Jordan case, and the State has declined to
appeal further. Although refunds through the court actions could be limited by a
three-year statute of limitations, with a potential liability of about $350
million, the Governor has proposed refunding fees collected back to the
initiation of these fees in 1990. The exposure to the State if the fees are
refunded in full could be up to $800 million.
Craig Brown, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. is
a Federal Mandate Proceeding. In fiscal years 1991-92 and 1992-93, the State
used credits from three Public Employees Retirement System accounts in place of
General Fund employer pension contributions. The DHHS has determined that
federally funded programs were overcharged in these fiscal years because they
did not receive the pension credits the State programs received and that
California owes the federal government $120 million for overpayments plus an
additional $80 million in interest through mid 1999. The DHHS Grant Appeals
Board upheld this determination. The present case is aimed at overturning the
DHHS determination. On June 6, 1999, the court ruled against the State. The
State has appealed to the Ninth Circuit. The estimated potential loss is over
$220 million which would be payable from the General Fund or, possibly,
recovered by the federal government through offsets against current grant
payments to the State.
PTI, Inc., et al. v. Philip Morris, et al. was filed by five distributors
in the cigarette import/re-entry business, seeking to overturn the tobacco
Master Settlement Agreement ("MSA") entered between 46 states and the tobacco
industry in November 1998. See "State Finances - Tobacco Litigation" above. The
primary focus of the complaint is the provision of the MSA encouraging
participating states to adopt a statute requiring nonparticipating manufacturers
to either become participating manufacturers and share the financial obligations
under the MSA or pay money into an escrow account. Plaintiffs seek compensatory
and punitive damages against the State and State officials and an order placing
tobacco settlement funds into a trust to be administered by the court for the
treatment of medical expenses of persons injured by tobacco products. A motion
to dismiss the complaint is currently scheduled for hearing in February 2000.
The potential fiscal impact of an adverse ruling is largely unknown, but could
exceed the full amount of the settlement (estimated to be $1 billion annually,
of which 50% will go directly to the State's General Fund and the other 50%
directly to the State's 58 counties and 4 largest cities).
Arnett v. California Public Employees Retirement System, et. al. was
filed by seven former employees of the State of California and local agencies
seeking back wages, damages and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs are former public
safety members who began employment after the age of 40 and are recipients of
Industrial Disability Retirement ("IDR") benefits. Plaintiffs contend that the
formula which determines the amount of IDR benefits violates the federal Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. Plaintiffs contend that, but for their
ages at hire, they would receive increased monthly IDR benefits similar to their
younger counterparts who began employment before the age of 40. On August 17,
1999, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court's dismissal
of the complaint for failure to state a claim. The State may seek further review
in the United States Supreme Court. However, the case has now been remanded back
to the District Court and trial will most likely occur in December 2000. In the
event of an unfavorable result, CalPERS has estimated the liability to the State
as approximately $315.5 million.
Year 2000-Related Information Technology
The State's reliance on information technology in every aspect of its
operations made year 2000-related ("Y2K") information technology ("IT") issues a
high priority for the State. The Department of Information Technology ("DOIT"),
an independent office reporting directly to the Governor, was responsible for
ensuring the State's information technology processes were fully functional
before the year 2000.
The DOIT estimates total Y2K costs identified by the departments under
its supervision at about $357 million. These costs are part of much larger
overall IT costs incurred annually by the State, including costs incurred by
certain independent State entities, such as the judiciary, the Legislature, the
University of California and California State University System. Furthermore,
cost estimates for embedded systems only apply to the subset of embedded systems
posing the highest risk to essential programs. For fiscal year 1999-00, the
Legislature created a fund of $33.5 million ($13.5 million General Fund) for
unanticipated Y2K costs, which can be increased if necessary.
<PAGE>
APPENDIX B
Description of S&P, Moody's and Fitch ratings:
S&P
Municipal Bond Ratings
An S&P municipal bond rating is a current assessment of the
creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific obligation.
The ratings are based on current information furnished by the issuer or
obtained by S&P from other sources it considers reliable, and will include: (1)
likelihood of default-capacity and willingness of the obligor as to the timely
payment of interest and repayment of principal in accordance with the terms of
the obligation; (2) nature and provisions of the obligation; and (3) protection
afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the event of
bankruptcy, reorganization or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and
other laws affecting creditors' rights.
AAA
Debt rated AAA has the highest rating assigned by S&P. Capacity to pay
interest and repay principal is extremely strong.
AA
Debt rated AA has a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay
principal and differs from the highest rated issues only in a small degree.
A
Principal and interest payments on bonds in this category are regarded as
safe. This rating describes the third strongest capacity for payment of debt
service. It differs from the two higher ratings because:
General Obligation Bonds -- There is some weakness in the local economic
base, in debt burden, in the balance between revenues and expenditures, or in
quality of management. Under certain adverse circumstances, any one such
weakness might impair the ability of the issuer to meet debt obligations at some
future date.
Revenue Bonds -- Debt service coverage is good, but not exceptional.
Stability of the pledged revenues could show some variations because of
increased competition or economic influences on revenues. Basic security
provisions, while satisfactory, are less stringent. Management performance
appears adequate.
BBB
Of the investment grade, this is the lowest.
General Obligation Bonds -- Under certain adverse conditions, several of
the above factors could contribute to a lesser capacity for payment of debt
service. The difference between "A" and "BBB" rating is that the latter shows
more than one fundamental weakness, or one very substantial fundamental
weakness, whereas the former shows only one deficiency among the factors
considered.
Revenue Bonds -- Debt coverage is only fair. Stability of the pledged
revenues could show substantial variations with the revenue flow possibly being
subject to erosion over time. Basic security provisions are no more than
adequate. Management performance could be stronger.
BB, B, CCC, CC, C
Debt rated BB, B, CCC, CC or C is regarded as having predominantly
speculative characteristics with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay
principal. BB indicates the least degree of speculation and C the highest degree
of speculation. While such debt will likely have some quality and protective
characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk
exposures to adverse conditions.
BB
Debt rated BB has less near-term vulnerability to default than other
speculative grade debt. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or
exposure to adverse business, financial or economic conditions which could lead
to inadequate capacity to meet timely interest and principal payments.
B
Debt rated B has a greater vulnerability to default but presently has the
capacity to meet interest payments and principal repayments. Adverse business,
financial or economic conditions would likely impair capacity or willingness to
pay interest and repay principal.
CCC
Debt rated CCC has a current identifiable vulnerability to default, and is
dependent upon favorable business, financial and economic conditions to meet
timely payments of principal. In the event of adverse business, financial or
economic conditions, it is not likely to have the capacity to pay interest and
repay principal.
CC
The rating CC is typically applied to debt subordinated to senior debt
which is assigned an actual or implied CCC rating.
C
The rating C is typically applied to debt subordinated to senior debt
which is assigned an actual or implied CCC- debt rating.
D
Bonds rated D are in default, and payment of interest and/or repayment of
principal is in arrears.
Plus (+) or minus (-): The ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the
addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major
ratings categories.
Municipal Note Ratings
SP-1
The issuers of these municipal notes exhibit very strong or strong
capacity to pay principal and interest. Those issues determined to possess
overwhelming safety characteristics are given a plus (+) designation.
SP-2
The issuers of these municipal notes exhibit satisfactory capacity to pay
principal and interest.
Commercial Paper Ratings
The designation A-1 by S&P indicates that the degree of safety regarding
timely payment is either overwhelming or very strong. Those issues determined to
possess overwhelming safety characteristics are denoted with a plus sign (+)
designation. Capacity for timely payment on issues with an A-2 designation is
strong. However, the relative degree of safety is not as high as for issues
designated A-1.
Moody's
Municipal Bond Ratings
Aaa
Bonds rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the
smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as "gilt edge."
Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin
and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to
change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the
fundamentally strong position of such issues.
Aa
Bonds rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together
with the Aaa group they comprise what generally are known as high-grade bonds.
They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not
be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of
greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the
long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa securities.
A
Bonds rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be
considered as upper medium-grade obligations. Factors giving security to
principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may be present
which suggest a susceptibility to impairment some time in the future.
Baa
Bonds rated Baa are considered as medium grade obligations, i.e., they are
neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments and principal
security appear adequate for the present but certain protective elements may be
lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of time.
Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have
speculative characteristics as well.
Ba
Bonds rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements; their future cannot
be considered as well assured. Often the protection of interest and principal
payments may be very moderate, and therefore not well safeguarded during both
good and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position characterizes bonds
in this class.
B
Bonds rated B generally lack characteristics of the desirable investment.
Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of
the contract over any long period of time may be small.
Caa
Bonds rated Caa are of poor standing. Such issues may be in default or
there may be present elements of danger with respect to principal or interest.
Ca
Bonds rated Ca present obligations which are speculative in a high degree.
Such issues are often in default or have other marked shortcomings.
C
Bonds rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds, and issues so rated can
be regarded as having extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real
investment standing.
Generally, Moody's provides either a generic rating or a rating with a
numerical modifier of 1 for bonds in each of the generic rating categories Aa,
A, Baa, and B. Moody's also provides numerical modifiers of 2 and 3 in each of
these categories for bond issues in the health care, higher education and other
not-for-profit sectors; the modifier 1 indicates that the issue ranks in the
higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates that the
issue is in the mid-range of the generic category; and the modifier 3 indicates
that the issue is in the low end of the generic category.
Municipal Note Ratings
Moody's ratings for state municipal notes and other short-term loans are
designated Moody's Investment Grade (MIG). Such ratings recognize the
differences between short-term credit risk and long-term risk. Factors affecting
the liquidity of the borrower and short-term cyclical elements are critical in
short-term ratings, while other factors of major importance in bond risk,
long-term secular trends for example, may be less important over the short run.
A short-term rating may also be assigned on an issue having a demand
feature. Such ratings will be designated as VMIG or, if the demand feature is
not rated, as NR. Short-term ratings on issues with demand features are
differentiated by the use of the VMIG symbol to reflect such characteristics as
payment upon periodic demand rather than fixed maturity dates and payment
relying on external liquidity. Additionally, investors should be alert to the
fact that the source of payment may be limited to the external liquidity with no
or limited legal recourse to the issuer in the event the demand is not met.
Moody's short-term ratings are designated Moody's Investment Grade as MIG
1 or VMIG 1 through MIG 4 or VMIG 4. As the name implies, when Moody's assigns a
MIG or VMIG rating, all categories define an investment grade situation.
MIG 1/VMIG 1
This designation denotes best quality. There is present strong protection
by established cash flows, superior liquidity support or demonstrated
broad-based access to the market for refinancing.
MIG 2/VMIG 2
This designation denotes high quality. Margins of protection are ample
although not so large as in the preceding group.
Commercial Paper Rating
The rating Prime-1 (P-1) is the highest commercial paper rating assigned
by Moody's. Issuers of P-1 paper must have a superior capacity for repayment of
short-term promissory obligations, and ordinarily will be evidenced by leading
market positions in well established industries, high rates of return on funds
employed, conservative capitalization structures with moderate reliance on debt
and ample asset protection, broad margins in earnings coverage of fixed
financial charges and high internal cash generation, and well established access
to a wide range of financial markets and assured sources of alternative
liquidity.
Issuers (or related supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 (P-2) have a
strong capacity for repayment of short-term promissory obligations. This
ordinarily will be evidenced by many of the characteristics cited above but to a
lesser degree. Earnings trends and coverage ratios, while sound, will be more
subject to variation. Capitalization characteristics, while still appropriate,
may be more affected by external conditions. Ample alternate liquidity is
maintained.
Fitch
Municipal Bond Ratings
The ratings represent Fitch's assessment of the issuer's ability to meet
the obligations of a specific debt issue or class of debt. The ratings take into
consideration special features of the issue, its relationship to other
obligations of the issuer, the current financial condition and operative
performance of the issuer and of any guarantor, as well as the political and
economic environment that might affect the issuer's future financial strength
and credit quality.
AAA
Bonds rated AAA are considered to be investment grade and of the highest
credit quality. The obligor has an exceptionally strong ability to pay interest
and repay principal, which is unlikely to be affected by reasonably foreseeable
events.
AA
Bonds rated AA are considered to be investment grade and of very high
credit quality. The obligor's ability to pay interest and repay principal is
very strong, although not quite as strong as bonds rated AAA. Because bonds
rated in the AAA and AA categories are not significantly vulnerable to
foreseeable future developments, short-term debt of these issuers is generally
rated F-1+.
A
Bonds rated A are considered to be investment grade and of high credit
quality. The obligor's ability to pay interest and repay principal is considered
to be strong, but may be more vulnerable to adverse changes in economic
conditions and circumstances than bonds with higher ratings.
BBB
Bonds rated BBB are considered to be investment grade and of satisfactory
credit quality. The obligor's ability to pay interest and repay principal is
considered to be adequate. Adverse changes in economic conditions and
circumstances, however, are more likely to have adverse impact on these bonds
and, therefore, impair timely payment. The likelihood that the ratings of these
bonds will fall below investment grade is higher than for bonds with higher
ratings.
BB
Bonds rated BB are considered speculative. The obligor's ability to pay
interest and repay principal may be affected over time by adverse economic
changes. However, business and financial alternatives can be identified which
could assist the obligor in satisfying its debt service requirements.
B
Bonds rated B are considered highly speculative. While bonds in this class
are currently meeting debt service requirements, the probability of continued
timely payment of principal and interest reflects the obligor's limited margin
of safety and the need for reasonable business and economic activity throughout
the life of the issue.
CCC
Bonds rated CCC have certain identifiable characteristics, which, if not
remedied, may lead to default. The ability to meet obligations requires an
advantageous business and economic environment.
CC
Bonds rated CC are minimally protected. Default in payment of interest
and/or principal seems probable over time.
C
Bonds rated C are in imminent default in payment of interest or principal.
DDD, DD and D
Bonds rated DDD, DD and D are in actual or imminent default of interest
and/or principal payments. Such bonds are extremely speculative and should be
valued on the basis of their ultimate recovery value in liquidation or
reorganization of the obligor. DDD represents the highest potential for recovery
on these bonds and D represents the lowest potential for recovery.
Plus (+) and minus (-) signs are used with a rating symbol to indicate the
relative position of a credit within the rating category. Plus and minus signs,
however, are not used in the AAA category covering 12-36 months or the DDD, DD
or D categories.
Short-Term Ratings
Fitch's short-term ratings apply to debt obligations that are payable on
demand or have original maturities of up to three years, including commercial
paper, certificates of deposit, medium-term notes, and municipal and investment
notes.
Although the credit analysis is similar to Fitch's bond rating analysis,
the short-term rating places greater emphasis than bond ratings on the existence
of liquidity necessary to meet the issuer's obligations in a timely manner.
F-1+
Exceptionally Strong Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating are
regarded as having the strongest degree of assurance for timely payment.
F-1
Very Strong Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating reflect an
assurance of timely payment only slightly less in degree than issues rated F-1+.
F-2
Good Credit Quality. Issues carrying this rating have a satisfactory
degree of assurance for timely payments, but the margin of safety is not as
great as the F-1+ and F-1 categories.
