DOMINION BRIDGE CORP
DFAN14A, 1997-06-02
HEAVY CONSTRUCTION OTHER THAN BLDG CONST - CONTRACTORS
Previous: DOMINION BRIDGE CORP, DEFA14A, 1997-06-02
Next: NUVEEN NEW YORK PERFORMANCE PLUS MUNICIPAL FUND INC, N-30D, 1997-06-02




                                  SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (RULE 14A-101)

                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                    PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A)
             OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )


Filed by the registrant / /

Filed by a party other than the registrant /X/

Check the appropriate box:

         / /   Preliminary Proxy Statement
         / /   Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
               Rule 14a-6(e)2))
         / /   Definitive Proxy Statement
         / /   Definitive Additional Materials
         /X/   Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14(a)-12



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  (Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)


             THE COMMITTEE TO REVITALIZE DOMINION BRIDGE CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Name of Person(s) filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)


         Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):

         /X/      No fee required.

         / /      Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
                  and 0-11.

         (1)      Title  of  each  class  of  securities  to  which  transaction
                  applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (2)      Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (3)      Per  unit  price  or other  underlying  value  of  transaction
                  computed  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
                  amount on which the filing fee is calculated  and state how it
                  was determined):


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (4)      Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

         (5)      Total fee paid:

         / /      Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.


         / /      Check  box if any part of the fee is  offset  as  provided  by
Exchange Act Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting
fee was
<PAGE>

paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

         (1)      Amount Previously Paid:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (2)      Form, Schedule or Registration Statement no.:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (3)      Filing Party:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (4)      Date Filed:

                                       -2-

<PAGE>
                                  PRESS RELEASE

                          DOMINION BRIDGE'S MANAGEMENT
                    SIDESTEPS RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS RECORD,
              SEEKS INSTEAD TO ACCUSE COMMITTEE OF IMPROPER MOTIVES


         New York -- June 2, 1997 -- The Committee to Revitalize Dominion Bridge
Corporation announced today that it was disappointed,  but hardly surprised,  by
the  response  issued today to its proposed  written  consent to remove  Michael
Marengere and other senior management  executives of Dominion Bridge Corporation
(NASDAQ: DBCO).

         The Company's  announcement  called the Committee's  action "an illegal
takeover attempt",  with "no premium" being offered to other  stockholders.  The
Committee  questions  how a proxy contest  through  written  consents,  in which
existing stockholders are given the freedom to chose new senior management,  can
be either  "illegal"  or even a  "takeover".  It is a democratic  process  which
apparently the Company is hoping to subvert through every available means.

         The  Company's  announcement  also  states  that the new  bylaws  being
proposed  by the  Committee  would  "divest  board  members of their  ability to
fulfill their  fiduciary  responsibilities".  The  Committee  flatly denies this
allegation.  To the contrary,  the new bylaws are aimed at giving stockholders a
greater voice by inserting various measures to help ensure accountability by the

<PAGE>

Board of Directors.  These include the right of  stockholders  to replace senior
executives,  call a special meeting and approve the chairman's compensation.  If
the Board was currently fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities, the Committee
believes that these measures would not be necessary.

         Finally,  the Company's  press  release  accuses  Committee  members of
"violating  securities  laws and  destroying  the companies with which they have
been  associated".  No doubt the Company does not  appreciate  the irony of this
statement given the barrage of lawsuits against the Company's senior  management
for self-dealing and other improper  activities,  the dismal  performance of the
Company's business and the 80% decline in its stock. In addition,  the Committee
intends to rebut these vague statements by the Company at the appropriate time.

         The  Committee  urges the  Company's  Board of  Directors  to listen to
stockholders,  not just  Marengere and his cohorts,  before giving  management a
blank  check to spend the  Company's  dwindling  cash  resources  to thwart  the
Committee's  proposed  written consent action.  The Committee  stated that it is
seeking to meet with the Board of Directors  to discuss the issues,  but to date
no response has been forthcoming.

                                       -2-

<PAGE>
         The  Committee  plans to hold an  informational  meeting for  concerned
stockholders on Wednesday, June 4, 1997, at 4:00 p.m. at the Harvard Club in New
York City.

                                      * * *

         The Committee to Revitalize  Dominion Bridge  corporation was formed in
May 1997 by, and consists, of Messrs. Kuhns, Mariash and Dutton to undertake the
written  consent  solicitation  to oust the  Company's  senior  executives.  The
Committee  is an  unincorporated  business  association  with its  office at 420
Lexington  Avenue,  Suite 2860, New York,  N.Y. 10170.  Its telephone  number is
(212) 953- 1010. The Committee's officers are Messrs. Kuhns, Mariash and Dutton.
Other  participants  may include Henry Hermann,  the executive vice president of
Kuhns  Brothers & Company,  Inc. Mr. Kuhns owns 100 shares of Common Stock;  Mr.
Mariash owns no shares of Common  Stock;  Mr. Dutton owns 1,900 shares of Common
Stock;  Mr.  Hermann owns 45,000 shares of Common Stock;  and the Committee owns
100 shares of Common Stock. Collectively, the Committee owns less than 1% of the
Shares.  No such  participant or associate owns any securities other than shares
of Common Stock and no such  participant  or  associate  owns any such shares of
record but not beneficially.


FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:           MR. JOHN D. KUHNS AT (212) 953-1010,
                                                        (860) 435-7000

                                   MR. JOHN M. DUTTON AT (213) 630-4401

                                   MR. HENRY HERMANN, KUHNS BROTHERS &
                                   COMPANY, INC. AT (214) 871-0404

                                       -3-


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission