DOMINION BRIDGE CORP
DFAN14A, 1997-07-08
HEAVY CONSTRUCTION OTHER THAN BLDG CONST - CONTRACTORS
Previous: PRICE T ROWE U S TREASURY FUNDS INC, N-30D, 1997-07-08
Next: MFS SPECIAL VALUE TRUST, N-30D, 1997-07-08



                                  SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (RULE 14A-101)

                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                    PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A)
             OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )


Filed by the registrant / /

Filed by a party other than the registrant /X/

Check the appropriate box:

         / /    Preliminary Proxy Statement
         / /    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
                Rule 14a-6(e)2))
         / /    Definitive Proxy Statement
         /X/    Definitive Additional Materials
         / /    Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14(a)-12



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  (Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)


             THE COMMITTEE TO REVITALIZE DOMINION BRIDGE CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Name of Person(s) filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)


         Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):

         /X/      No fee required.

         / /      Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
                  and 0-11.

         (1)      Title  of  each  class  of  securities  to  which  transaction
                  applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (2)      Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (3)      Per  unit  price  or other  underlying  value  of  transaction
                  computed  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
                  amount on which the filing fee is calculated  and state how it
                  was determined):


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (4)      Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

         (5)      Total fee paid:

         / /      Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.


         / /      Check  box if any part of the fee is  offset  as  provided  by
Exchange Act Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting
fee was


<PAGE>

paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

         (1)      Amount Previously Paid:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (2)      Form, Schedule or Registration Statement no.:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (3)      Filing Party:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (4)      Date Filed:

                                       -2-


<PAGE>
                  COMMITTEE RESPONDS TO SECOND DOMINION BRIDGE
                          PRESS RELEASE ON COURT ORDER


                  New York -- July 7, 1997 -- In  response  to a  further  press
release issued earlier today by Dominion Bridge Corporation (NASDAQ: DBCO) about
the Federal District Court's July 2, 1997 decision in Delaware, the Committee to
Revitalize Dominion Bridge Corporation issued the following statement:

                  On July 2, 1997, for the second time in less than a month, the
Federal  court has rejected the Company's  motion for expedited  discovery and a
hearing with respect to the Company's counterclaims against the Committee.

                  In  addition,  the  Committee  has been advised by its counsel
that the Committee's  by-laws,  when adopted,  will be fully consistent with all
requirements  of Delaware law. The Company's  suggestion that such by-laws would
"unlawfully divest" the Board of authority to manage the business and affairs is
completely without merit.

                  We  again  ask  that  stockholders   recognize  the  Company's
pronouncements   as  self-serving   diatribes  which  are  designed  to  detract
stockholders  from  the  real  issue  at  hand:  moving  forward  now  with  the
Committee's  proposals  with  respect to  Dominion,  as set forth in its consent
solicitation statement.  July 18, 1997 is the target date for accomplishing this
objective.  Stockholders  who  support  the  Committee  should  submit the white
consent  card by that date and  discard  the  Company's  green  card.  The white
consent cards will be valid and fully enforceable.

                  The  Company  has  improperly   suggested  that  it  will  not
recognize the solicitation  until the matter is ultimately decided by the Court.
No Stockholder  contemplating  supporting the Committee  should be influenced by
such a blatantly improper suggestion. Irrespective of the comments of Dominion's
self- interested Board, all Stockholders should  affirmatively  advise the Board
of their position on the solicitation by submitting the white consent card.



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission