<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB/A
(Mark One)
X ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
- ----- 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998
OR
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
- ----- ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission File No. 0-18438
-------
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
----------------------------------
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)
Delaware 68-0110509
-------- ----------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 480, Los Angeles, California 90067
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(310) 552-6393
------------------
(Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on Which Registered
------------------- -------------------
None None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.0001
------------------------------
(Title of Class)
Check whether the issuer: (1) Filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 14(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
---- -----
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this form 10-KSB. [X]
State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $2,861,392.
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed
by reference to the average bid and asked prices of such stock on April 7, 1999
was $5,577,341.
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of April 7,
1999 was 12,669,460.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes No X
---- ----
1
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS.
GENERAL
Vitafort International Corporation (the "Company" or "Vitafort" or
"Registrant") was formed as a California corporation in 1986, and reincorporated
as a Delaware corporation in 1989. Prior to May of 1993, Vitafort was in the
business of formulating and developing value-added foods and beverages for third
parties. In addition, the Company was also marketing branded seafood. In May
of 1993, these businesses were discontinued due to lack of revenues and profit
and later in the year the Company disposed of them. In the fall of 1993, the
Company installed new management, who selected a new direction for the Company.
Vitafort would begin developing fat free and low fat bakery snacks that would be
marketed under Company owned trademarks.
In the spring of 1994, Vitafort introduced its first branded product called
Fudgets(TM), a single-serve fat free brownie with icing. Four flavors of
Fudgets were marketed throughout 1994 and 1995. In the spring of 1995, the
Company introduced double chocolate, cappuccino and peanut flavor Fudgets in a
multi-pack of five individually wrapped 1.4 oz., packages. In the latter part of
1995, Vitafort signed a co-packing agreement with The Keebler Company
("Keebler") and began the marketing introduction of four flavors of fat free
cakes called Caketts(TM) In the fourth quarter of 1995, as the Company was
completing the final stages of its financing, the Company put in place the
distribution infrastructure that would support the roll out of these seven new
flavors of Fudgets and Caketts. In addition, the Company began the manufacture
of Fudgets at Michel's Bakery.
During the second quarter of 1996, the Company made a strategic acquisition
of the intangibles of Auburn Farms, a successful national food distributor.
These intangibles included the right to market successful breakfast pastry, fig
bars and healthy cookie products. During the same quarter, the Company
experienced mold on Caketts made at Keebler and the Fudgets at Michel's Bakery.
In 1996, Vitafort sought to promote the brands acquired from Auburn Farms
both because they were historically successful and because its distribution
network required good quality product. The quality problems experienced with
product produced by Keebler made it imperative that Vitafort successfully
introduce the Auburn Farms products to sustain its distribution network.
Unfortunately, the Company's efforts to do so were impeded by the refusal of
Auburn Farms' contract manufacturer (New Life Bakery) to produce that product
pursuant to contract, and by the conduct of Barbara's Bakery. The Company
believes that Barbara's and New Life entered into an illegal agreement whereby
New Life illegally made the Auburn Farms' products for Barbara's and Barbara's
misrepresented the source and origin of this product to distributors by falsely
claiming exclusive distribution rights. The Company believes that Barbara's
marketed the imitation products in a confusingly similar manner.
During the third quarter of 1996, the Company shipped orders of Caketts
and Fudgets produced by its new co-packer. However, complaints from retailers
about mold on products produced by Keebler (Caketts) and Michel's (Fudgets)
continued. By December the Company learned that the damage to the consumer
acceptance of these brands caused by the defective product already shipped was
greater than previously realized. As a result, fourth quarter sales were
significantly adversely affected and costs relating to this problem were much
greater than previously anticipated.
By early 1998, it had become apparent that the severe damage done to both
Caketts and Fudgets was irreversible and both lines would have to be
discontinued. The acquisition of the Auburn Farms and Nature's Warehouse brands
in 1996 did provide the sales team with products to sell and market in 1998.
However, these brands had also been damaged due to the disruption of business
created by Barbara's Bakery.
2
<PAGE>
The Company now believes that the conduct of Barbara's and New Life
described above not only foreclosed it from successfully distributing the Auburn
Farms product, but also caused Vitafort to suffer the loss of most of its
distributor network. The Company believes that this network would have survived
the mold problems with products produced at Keebler had Vitafort been able to
offer a viable alternative, i.e., the Auburn Farms products, without the market
confusion and apparently illegal sales by Barbara's of imitation products.
The Company filed an arbitration proceeding against Keebler related to the
mold and a lawsuit against Barbara's Bakery and New Life in federal court
related to the unfair competition. In 1997, the Company was awarded and
received approximately $6,750,000 from Keebler in that arbitration proceeding.
These damages did not include lost profits and lost business opportunities
related to the Auburn Farms products. The Auburn Farms case is set for a jury
trial in May 2000. The Company expects that it will request an award of
approximately $10 million in compensatory damages and significantly more in
punitive and other damages. See Legal Proceedings for further discussion.
The need for new products led the Company to the acquisition of Global
International Sourcing and the formation of Hollywood Partners in 1998. The
mission of Hollywood Partners was to develop unique snacks that could utilize
the brand equity of intellectual property rights of established licenses.
Global's mission was to source new innovative products from around the world and
negotiate favorable co-packing agreements for the Company. The first products
sourced through Global were the Company's line of fruit flavor marshmallows,
which the Company markets under "The Wizard of Oz" brand. This license was
secured by Hollywood Partners through Warner Bros. and introduced at the All
Candy Expo in Chicago in late June. In addition, Hollywood Partners has also
secured the rights for "The Wizard of Oz" brand for collectors tins filled with
both gummy candy and lollipops. This product was introduced in the fourth
quarter at Wal-Mart, with a $425,000 purchase order.
Throughout the year the sales team continued to re-build the infrastructure
that would support the rollout of these products. New brokers were hired to
represent the Company to retailers across the country. However, there was still
considerable damage to repair, especially among the distributors that had
handled both Auburn Farms and Vitafort products. Management decided to focus
the resources of the sales team towards gaining distribution of marshmallows,
which is a category that sells directly to the retailer, rather than through a
distributor. This allowed for immediate distribution of "The Wizard of Oz"
brand marshmallows into thousands of stores in the third and fourth quarter of
1998. These chains included; Vons, Bi-Lo, H.E. Butt, Albertsons, Winn Dixie,
A&P, Super Fresh, Walbaums, Pamida, Fleming, Wakefern, Big Y and many others.
Although management believes that the Company's products are unique and are
superior in taste to competitively available products, the food industry is
characterized by the continual development of new products employing various new
technologies and processes. Additionally, the Company must overcome the
negative goodwill associated with the defective products produced by its former
co-packers. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that new products will not
be developed and marketed, which are superior to the Company's products in
taste, texture and feel and or that the Company's products will achieve or
maintain reasonable levels of market acceptance..
MANUFACTURING & WAREHOUSING
The Company manufactures its products by entering into agreements ("co-
packer agreements") with established food manufacturers ("co-packers"), who have
the facilities, staff, quality assurance and process control programs for the
production of their own products, as well as the Company's products. Co-packer
relations are intended to enable the Company to secure the expertise of
qualified food manufacturers with respect to the development, manufacture and
packaging of the product. This arrangement achieves economies of scale in
production and staffing requirements, while providing production flexibility to
meet changes in product mix demand by customers that the Company could not
achieve on its own. Additionally, the Company benefits from the production
experience and expertise of these companies while avoiding the capital outlays,
staffing requirements, quality control, legal process requirements and other
manufacturing
3
<PAGE>
costs and delays that the Company would encounter were it to attempt to
manufacture its products utilizing its own facility. However, there can be no
assurance that co-packers will meet their obligations.
Over the last eighteen months, the Company has worked diligently on
establishing strong manufacturing relationships for its products. The most
significant development in this initiative is the sourcing of product from
Mexico. Global International Sourcing has established manufacturing
relationships in Mexico to supply Hollywood Partners with all of the confection
products for "The Wizard of Oz" brand. The Company is currently working with
leading suppliers of both tins, lollipops, gummy candy and marshmallows.
The Company also has built a relationship over the last year with one of
the leading suppliers of toaster pastries in the country. Currently this
supplier is manufacturing Toast `N Jammers(TM) for the Company; however, they
have also offered Vitafort the opportunity to market a low cost control label
brand to compete in that marketplace. The Company also utilizes two regional
bakers in California to manufacture cookies. This allows for minimal start-up
cost, as the cookies are being test marketed. The Company is currently sourcing
alternative bakeries in Mexico to lower costs and increase margins.
The newest manufacturing agreement is with Haarmann & Reimer ("H&R"), a
wholly owned subsidiary of Bayer AG. H&R will supply the Company with the bulk
ingredient for Peanut Squeeze(TM), the newest product from the Company. In
addition, H&R will continue to develop other products for Vitafort, working as
the Research and Development arm of the Company.
Vitafort's products are currently warehoused in two locations: Laredo, TX
and Los Angeles, CA. With the addition of "Peanut Squeeze" to the mix, the
logistic department is analyzing the feasibility of one centralized warehouse in
the central part of the United States. This would provide for increased
customer service and reduced costs.
THE FOOD BROKER NETWORK
The broker network, which is a key to establishing products in the
marketplace, is currently positioned to initiate the objectives of the Company
as its products are prepared for introduction. Vitafort's tier-one broker
infrastructure consists of many of the prominent food brokers in the country who
represent the Company throughout the southeast region and Texas. These brokers
represent many of the leading food processors in the world, such as: Con Agra,
Clorox, Ocean Spray, Hershey's, M&M Mars, along with hundreds of others.
THE RETAIL TRADE
The Company's retail distribution strategy is to target the following
classes of trade: Supermarkets, mass merchandisers, drug stores, warehouse
clubs, convenience stores, natural food stores and military commissaries and
exchanges. Due to the consolidation in the industry, it is extremely important
to maintain strong relationships with the leading retailers. Over ninety
percent of all products being purchased in club stores, drug chains and mass
merchandisers are now controlled by eleven companies. The Company currently has
broker representation at all eleven of these national accounts and is positioned
to present Vitafort's products within ninety days of product launch date. The
Company has already gained distribution at leading retailers across the country,
such as: Wal-Mart, Sam's Club, A&P, Bruno's, Stop and Shop, Bi-Lo, Winn Dixie,
Vons, Ralph's, Trader Joes, Smith's Food and Drug, Grand Union, Pamida, and
others. In addition, the Company has shipped products to many of the leading
wholesalers, such as: Fleming, Super Valu, Wakefern, Roundy's, Nash Finch,
Certified Grocers and others.
During the year ended December 31, 1998, sales exceeding 10% of
consolidated sales were made to Wal-Mart and A-1 International, Inc., a
distributor. During the year ended December 31, 1997, sales exceeding 10% of
consolidated sales were made to A-1 International, Inc.
4
<PAGE>
MARKETING
Over the past year the management of the Company has changed the marketing
direction of the company due to changing consumer trends. In 1996, when
Vitafort introduced the first line of extended shelf life fat free cakes called
Caketts, the growth in the fat free category was over 30% and consumer trends
had companies introducing healthy snacks at an alarming rate. Obviously, with
all these new entrants into the market, many of which tasted terrible, consumers
became disenchanted and the category began to shrink. Fat free became
synonymous with bad taste.
Taste is king and consumers will no longer sacrifice taste to eat healthy.
The new marketing direction of the Company focuses on taste first and everything
else second. All of the Company's healthy products are now either low fat or
reduced fat, rather than fat free. In addition, the packaging addresses the fat
content on the front panel with more of a subtle approach.
Management also identified an opportunity to take advantage of a void in
the food industry. Over 100 billion dollars of licensed products are sold
worldwide and yet very few food products are sold through the use of licenses.
Many companies will utilize blockbuster licenses, such as Godzilla or Babe, to
promote their brands during the movie release or video release. However, most
companies do not promote these licensed products for more than a few months.
Management feels there is a tremendous opportunity to marry these licenses to a
good product and build a brand. "Flintstone's Childrens Vitamins" is an
excellent example of a license that has become a brand leader in the category.
The marketing plan of Hollywood Partners is to establish "The Wizard of Oz"
marshmallows as the leading brand in the marshmallow category. This can be
accomplished by providing unique superior tasting products, high impact
packaging and strong promotional support from Warner Bros. Management feels it
has these ingredients in place and is positioned to take advantage of this
opportunity.
Hollywood Partners is also evaluating additional licenses in 1999 and will
be making those decisions in the upcoming year.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT PROTECTION AND TRADEMARKS
The Company believes that its trademarks do afford it some degree of
protection from competition and do allow it to differentiate its products from
those of its competitors through brand loyalty and identity. There are however,
no assurances that such trademarks may offer significant protection from
competitors or that the Company would be successful should litigation to protect
such trademarks become necessary. The Company is seeking to determine whether
its various formulas and procedures are patentable in the United States, and
relies upon non-disclosure, secrecy agreements and its common law rights in
order to protect its proprietary formulae, procedures, and other information.
No assurance can be given that such steps will adequately protect the Company
against competing products or that the Company will be able to adequately
enforce its rights against third parties who may be utilizing the Company's
proprietary formulae, procedures and other information. If the Company is
advised by counsel that any of its formulae, processes, procedures or other
techniques are patentable, then it may seek appropriate patent protection.
The Company has developed several proprietary formulations for its
products. While these formulations may or may not be protected under the U.S.
Patent laws, they may have value inasmuch as they provide Vitafort with its
unique competitive edge. The Company has established brands within certain
market niches of major product categories. The Company's trademarks and licenses
are detailed below:
5
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Trademarks &
Licenses Description and Status
<S> <C>
Vitafort This is an actively marketed mark and used on all Company material; however,
quality problems encountered in 1996 have impaired the value of this mark.
Auburn Farms Trade name acquired in May 1996 with existing presence in the natural foods class
of trade. However, confusion caused over competition has impaired the mark.
Natures Warehouse Trade name acquired in May 1996 with existing presence in the natural food class
of trade. However, confusion caused over competition has impaired the mark.
Toast `N Jammers A repositioned brand name with specialty grocery and natural food presence.
However, confusion caused over competition has impaired the mark.
Jammers One of the all-natural fat free cookie brands in natural food class of trade.
However, confusion caused over competition has impaired the mark.
7-Grainers One of the all-natural brands in natural food class of trade.
Pastry Poppers A repositioned brand name with specialty grocery and natural food presence.
However, confusion caused over competition has impaired the mark.
Avenue of the Stars Trade name used for all Hollywood Partners licensed products.
Juliette's Private The trade name used for both low fat cookies and low fat chocolate truffles.
Collection
Caketts This product once occupied significant shelf space in supermarkets throughout the
country. Quality problems associated with this productappear to have
substantially diminished the value of this mark. The Company ceased marketing
Caketts in May 1998.
Fudgets This was one of the key food products with distribution in a number of
supermarkets throughout the U.S. Quality problems encountered in 1996 have
severely limited the realization of this mark. The Company discontinued all
SKU's in 1998.
"The Wizard of Oz"
Marshmallows The licensed marshmallow brand currently being marketed throughout the retail
trade. Currently on the shelf of thousands of grocery stores across the country.
"The Wizard of Oz" The licensed brand currently being marketed to retailers across the country. The
Lollipops & Gummy initial distribution went to Wal-Mart late in 1998.
Collectors Tins
"Jurassic Park: The The Company's first licensed product introduced in late 1997.
Lost World" Popcorn &
Pretzels
</TABLE>
6
<PAGE>
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION
In general, production, packaging, processing and labeling of food and
beverage products are subject to various federal and state regulations. The
Company relies upon the experience and expertise of its co-packers to assure
compliance with applicable federal and state regulations. The Company believes
that it is in compliance with all applicable governmental regulations.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company has modified its research and development strategies from prior
years. In the past, the Company retained highly trained technical support
professionals to independently develop formulations and work with contract
manufacturers to bring the products to market readiness. The strategy moving
forward in 1999 and beyond is to work with manufacturers from the outset and
utilize their internal research and technical staff to develop new products. In
addition, the Company will also work closely with ingredient suppliers such as
Haarmann & Reimer to develop new innovative products, especially in the value -
added nutraceutical category. This strategy will reduce research and development
costs in the future and allow the Company to focus its resources on the sales
and marketing of new products. Research and development expenses were $362,770
in 1998 and $337,806 in 1997.
COMPETITION
The Company is engaged in the highly competitive health food marketplace.
There are numerous companies with financial and business resources far greater
than Vitafort's who are currently marketing competitive products. The Company
seeks to compete based on the unique taste, texture and quality of its products
and by obtaining recognition for its trademarks and licenses.
The Vitafort brands compete within different categories and with different
products depending upon the class of trade and placement within retail outlets.
The chart below details the Company's product lines and identifies the
competitors within the classes of trade.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VITAFORT BRAND CLASS OF TRADE PRINCIPAL COMPETITION MARKET NICHE
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Juliette's Private Natural foods and There is no known direct Appeal to those consumers who
Collection grocery stores. competition for boxed low are not willing to sacrifice
Chocolate Truffles fat chocolate cream the taste of real chocolates,
candies. but demand a nutritional
profile that provides lower
fat than traditional
chocolates.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Juliette's Private Natural foods and Westbrae, Appeal to consumers who want
Collection grocery stores. Pepperidge Farms, a premium cookie with great
Super Premium Cookies Barbara's, taste and just the right
Pamela's amount of fat to ensure great
taste.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toast `N Jammers Low Natural food stores, Health Valley Healthy Toast `N Jammers may have a
Fat Toaster Pastries grocery stores and Tarts, and Natures' competitive edge in taste and
club stores. Choice Toaster Pastries all natural ingredients, but
has been injured by unfair
competition.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
7
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pastry Poppers Natural food stores, Health Valley Healthy Toast `N Jammers may have a
Full Fat Toaster grocery stores and Tarts, and Natures' competitive edge in taste and
Pastries club stores. Choice Toaster Pastries all natural ingredients, but
has been injured by unfair
competition.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jammers Fat Free Natural foods and Health Valley Cookies, The brand has been injured by
Cookies and Brownies grocery stores. Westbrae Cookies, Heaven unfair competition.
Scent Cookies, Barbara's
Cookies, Pamela's
Cookies, Frookies Cookies
& Brownies, Greenfield's
Brownies
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wizard of Oz Grocery, mass None flavored Flavored marshmallow snack to
Marshmallows merchants, club and be used as an ingredient or
discount drug stores everyday snack.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wizard of Oz Grocery, mass Exclusive license, other Presenting for sales in the
Gummy Candies merchants, club and candy tins available 3rd and 4th quarter tied to
discount drug stores during the holidays. Fall video release and 60th
anniversary.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wizard of Oz Grocery, mass Exclusive license, other Presenting for sales in the
Lollipops merchants, club and candy tins available 3rd and 4th quarter tied to
discount drug stores during the holidays. Fall video release and 60th
anniversary
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND SEASONALITY
Management believes that the costs associated with compliance with
environmental regulations do not at this time impose a significant burden upon
the Company's operations. Any change in that burden, however, could adversely
impact the Company. Management does not believe that the Company's business is
seasonal to any significant extent.
EMPLOYEES
As of April 7, 1999, the Company had 10 employees of whom 3 were executive
officers, 1 was engaged in sales and marketing, and 6 were clerical and
administrative.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Company's principal executive office consists of 3,921 rentable square
feet located at 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles, California, which is
leased pursuant to a three-year lease which expired August 31, 1997. The base
rent under said lease was $69,000 for the first year of the term; $72,000 for
the second year of the term; and, $75,000 for the third year of the term. The
Company is now leasing the same space on a month-to-month basis at a rate of
$7,250 per month and believes that it could find adequate space at similar cost
were it required to do so. The Company believes its current facilities are
suitable for its needs.
8
<PAGE>
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In December 1994, Lloyd Gauntt, who invested an aggregate of $75,000 in
certain of the Company's private placements, initiated an action in Superior
Court, Orange County, California against his stockbroker, two national brokerage
firms, several companies in which he had invested, and, certain of those
companies' officers. Included among the defendants were the Company and its
then Chief Executive Officer, Steve Westlund. The complaint seeks damages in an
unspecified amount in excess of $500,000 and punitive damages in an unspecified
amount in excess of $5,000,000. The Court has dismissed the class action claims
as to the Company and granted a motion that the claims against the brokerage
firms and associated persons must be submitted to arbitration. The plaintiff
has appealed that ruling. The Company denies any liability to the plaintiff and
intends to vigorously defend this action. The Company notes that the plaintiff
sold a portion of the securities he purchased from the Company, realizing a
profit; that the balance of the securities became salable under Rule 144; and
that, if sold, the plaintiff's losses on the Company's securities might be as
little as $15,000.
In connection with the acquisition of assets of Auburn Farms, Inc., ("AFI")
in 1996, the Company acquired the intellectual property and certain claims of
AFI. In May 1996 the Company filed an action in federal court alleging Lanham
Act violations, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition,
conspiracy and related claims arising out of New Life and Barbara's
misappropriation of Auburn Farms' principal products by AFI's co-packer, New
Life Bakery ("New Life"), and a principal competitor, Barbara's Bakery
("Barbara's"). The Lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of California which is scheduled for trial in May 2000.
Vitafort is seeking in excess of $10 million in damages based on claims of
unfair competition, breach of contract, fraud among other claims. These claims
arise from New Life's abrupt termination of production for Auburn Farms and its
alleged conspiracy with Barbara's Bakery to make and distribute to natural food
stores and other retailers products to which Auburn Farms (and Vitafort as
successor) had contractual rights to distribute exclusively. It is also based on
Barbara's Bakery's representations to brokers, distributors and consumers that
it had the right to distribute these same food products. The defendants have
filed counterclaims against Vitafort and its Chief Executive Officer seeking $5
million in damages.
Vitafort has secured up to $800,000 in off balance sheet financing for the
litigation against New Life and Barbara's Bakery, including $600,000 from a
newly-formed investment partnership, Auburn Farms Vindication Partners, LLC, for
the purpose of paying the legal fees and expenses of the pending litigation. The
fee arrangement includes a limited, partial contingency arrangement with Jenner
& Block, one of the nation's leading trial firms. Jenner & Block also
represented Vitafort in the 1997 arbitration against The Keebler Company that
resulted in Vitafort receiving $6.75 million in damages and attorneys' fees.
Under the fee arrangements, the first proceeds received from the litigation if
any, will go to repay the advancements of legal fees and expenses, including
those made by the Company. Between 25% to 35% of any additional amounts may be
paid to the investment partnership. Additionally, the investment group may
collectively receive as much as $180,000 as additional compensation from a
successful resolution in the litigation. These fee arrangements may materially
decrease the value of any recovery to the Company.
On March 25, 1998, New Life and Barbara's purported to purchase from AFI's
bankruptcy estate certain claims against Barbara's and New Life for $300,000.
The purchased claims do not include any of the claims previously acquired by the
Company. In a subsequent transaction, Vitafort acquired Sacramento Commercial
Bank's interest in the litigation proceeds. The Company has been advised by
outside litigation counsel that evidence produced in discovery may support a
request for punitive damages. The Company may be obligated to pay a portion of
any recovery to the Company against New Life to AFI's bankruptcy estate and/or
its creditors, as well as a portion of any recovery against any defendant to the
Auburn Farms Vindication Limited Partnership which is committed to funding a
significant part of the litigation expense. The Company intends to pursue this
litigation vigorously. There is no assurance given that the Company will receive
any recovery. The Company believes that the distribution of the Auburn Farms
products was substantially injured by unfair competition from Barbara's Bakery
and New Life.
9
<PAGE>
On September 29, 1998, a complaint was filed in Superior Court, the County
of Los Angeles, in an action entitled "Kirtland & Packard LLP, a California
Limited Liability Partnership vs. Vitafort, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; and
Does 1-25 inclusive." The complaint alleges Breach of Contract, Fraud,
Negligent Misrepresentation, Common Counts, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good
Faith and Fair Dealing, Negligent Performance of Contract, and Declaratory
Relief, arising out of a contract for legal services. The Complaint seeks
damages in the amount of $85,000 plus interest and attorneys fees, and for such
other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. The Company is
vigorously defending the suit.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders during 1998.
10
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock, redeemable warrants (each of which entitles the
holder to purchase one-twentieth of one share of common stock at a price of
$2.375 or $47.50 per share through the close of business on October 31, 1997, or
an earlier redemption date) and units (each of which is comprised of three
shares pre-reverse split and .15 shares post reverse split of common stock and
two redeemable warrants) traded on the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc., Automatic Quotation System ("NASDAQ") from December 19, 1989, the
effective date of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-18, until
August 27, 1992. At that time, the Company fell below the net asset requirement
for continued listing and was subsequently disqualified. Since such date, the
Company's securities have traded on the Electronic Bulletin Board maintained by
NASDAQ. Prior to December 19, 1989, there was no market for the Company's
securities. The table below sets forth the high and low closing bid prices for
the common stock, redeemable warrants and units during the period January 1,
1996 to December 31, 1998, as reported on the Electronic Bulletin Board; and, as
adjusted to take into effect a one-for-twenty reverse stock split effected on
October 4, 1996. The Company's redeemable warrants expired on October 31,
1998 and there were no quotations for the warrants or units after such date.
The quotations represent inter-dealer quotations without adjustment for retail
mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not represent actual transactions:
11
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period Common Stock Warrants Units
High Low High Low High Low
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1st Quarter 1996 $14.063 $5.938 $ 0.050 $0.010 $1.625 $0.250
2nd Quarter 1996 $ 7.188 $4.688 $ 0.010 $0.010 $1.000 $1.000
3rd Quarter 1996 $ 6.250 $2.813 $ 0.010 $0.010 $1.000 $0.500
4th Quarter 1996 $ 4.063 $0.875 $ 0.010 $0.010 $0.500 $0.500
1st Quarter 1997 $ 2.297 $0.875 $ 0.010 $0.010 $0.500 $0.500
2nd Quarter 1997 $ 1.625 $0.625 $ 0.010 $0.010 $0.500 $0.500
3rd Quarter 1997 $ 1.844 $0.813 $ 0.010 $0.010 $0.500 $0.500
4th Quarter 1997 $ 1.750 $0.750 $ 0.010 * $0.500 $0.500
1st Quarter 1998 $ 1.468 $0.687 $ 0.010 * $0.500 $0.500
2nd Quarter 1998 $ 1.437 $0.828 $ 0.010 * $0.500 $0.500
3rd Quarter 1998 $ 1.000 $0.250 $ 0.010 * $0.500 $0.500
4th Quarter 1998 $ 0.250 $0.080 $ 0.000** * ** **
</TABLE>
* Less than $ 0.010
** The Company's redeemable warrants expired on October 31, 1998 and there
were no quotations for the warrants after such date. There were no quotations
for the units in the fourth quarter of 1998.
The above amounts have been retroactively adjusted for a 1 for 20 reverse
stock split, which occurred on October 4, 1996.
On April 7, 1999, the closing bid price for the common stock, as reported
by the Over The Counter Electronic Bulletin Board, was $0.48.
At the close of business on April 7, 1999, there were approximately 483
holders of record of the common stock.
The Company has not paid any dividends on the common stock since inception
and intends to retain any future earnings for the development of its business.
Future dividends on the common stock, if any, will be dependent upon the
Company's earnings, financial condition, the dividend priority of any preferred
shares and other relevant factors as determined by its Board of Directors.
No dividends were paid on Series B Convertible Preferred Stock during 1997
or 1998. Cumulative unpaid dividends on the Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock as of December 31, 1998 totaled $30,000. During August 1996, the holder
of 500 of the then 1,500 issued and outstanding shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock converted his shares and all accrued dividends thereon into
2,500 shares of Common Stock (as adjusted for the reverse stock split effected
in October 1996). The conversion of the Series B Preferred Shares was in
accordance with the formula set forth in the Certificate of Designation for such
security and the accrued dividends were converted at the market price for the
Common Stock at the date of the conversion. In March 1996, the 672.5 shares of
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and all accrued dividends thereon were
converted to Common Stock at $.375 per share ($7.50 as adjusted for the reverse
12
<PAGE>
stock split). All unpaid dividends on the preferred stock must be paid before
dividends can be paid on the Common Stock.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of "Safe Harbor Provisions" of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Except for historical facts, all matters discussed in this prospectus, which are
forward looking, involve a high degree of risk and uncertainty. Potential risks
and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, competitive pressures from
other food companies and within the grocery industry, the impact of quality
problems experienced in 1996, difficulties encountered with the acquisition of
Auburn Farms and Nature's Warehouse brands in 1996, the lack of adequate capital
to fund continuing operations, economic conditions in the Company's primary
markets and other uncertainties detailed from time-to-time in the Company's
Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997
- --------------------------------------
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The past year has seen many exciting developments from Vitafort. Hollywood
Partners, the Company's wholly owned subsidiary formed in late 1997, agreed to
terms with Warner Bros. for the licensing rights to "The Wizard of Oz" for
marshmallows, gummy candy, lollipops and collectors tins. The Company continued
the development of "Peanut Squeeze," the first product in the category to be
dispensed from a squeeze bottle. The Company's manufacturing partner in this
endeavor is Haarmann & Reimer, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bayer AG. The
direct distribution infrastructure has been improved dramatically from 1997, as
new tier-one brokers have been appointed to represent the Company's products
throughout the country. However, the most encouraging news of the year was the
actual orders shipped to leading retailers such as: Wal-Mart, Sam's Club,
Vons, Albertsons, Winn-Dixie, A&P and others. Management has focused
throughout the year on establishing goodwill in the marketplace and the shipment
of new products in 1998 to retailers across the country certainly helped
validate the success of these efforts. Another important development this past
year was the acquisition of Global International Sourcing, Inc. ("Global").
Global would be responsible for product sourcing and development. This would
allow the balance of the management team to focus on the sales and marketing of
these new products.
After discontinuing both Fudgets and Caketts, the two brands that had
provided the majority of the Company's sales over the prior two years, it became
apparent that the first half of 1998 would be one of product development.
Significant losses were incurred during this period, but three product lines
were being prepared for launch in the second half of 1998 and the first half of
1999. The first rollout, "The Wizard of Oz" marshmallows shipped initial orders
in late June. These fruit flavored marshmallows were the top selling product
line of the Company in 1998 and hold great promise in 1999, as Hollywood
Partners looks to add white marshmallows to the mix. In the fourth quarter,
Wal-Mart placed a $425,000 purchase order for "The Wizard of Oz" gummy candy and
lollipop collectors tins. These tins are being presented for distribution in
the third and fourth quarter of 1999. The Company test marketed "Juliette's
Private Collection" cookies in the fourth quarter and looks to roll out
additional distribution in 1999.
The most significant product development of the year was the final stages
of the development process for "Peanut Squeeze," the Company's entree into the
peanut butter section. Management feels that this product launch has a
tremendous opportunity to gain market share in this one billion-dollar category.
"Peanut Squeeze" will be introduced in the second quarter of 1999 at the FMI
trade show in Chicago. Buckley/Friedman, a leading advertising agency, will
handle the advertising, public relations and packaging design for the product.
They will also assist management in the overall marketing direction of the
product
13
<PAGE>
launch. Buckley Friedman established themselves as a leader in the field by
initiating the marketing direction of Balance Bar that lead to sales increases
from 1.5 million to 80 million units.
The manufacturing and product development aspects of the Company have been
greatly improved over the past year with the relationships established in
Mexico. These manufacturers have provided the Company with innovative great
tasting products that have resulted in new distribution and strong margins.
Haarmann & Reimer will also play a significant role in the upcoming year as
"Peanut Squeeze" is introduced and additional new items are developed. The
Company will continue to source additional suppliers and products from around
the world in the upcoming year to increase quality, lower costs and increase
revenue. However, management feels the immediate opportunities in the
marshmallow and peanut butter categories should provide the momentum needed to
achieve critical mass.
NET SALES
In 1998 the net sales of the Company were $2,861,392 compared to $1,995,317
in 1997. This increase of 43.4% was primarily due to the new product
introductions of "The Wizard of Oz" brands products in the second half of 1998.
"The Wizard of Oz" marshmallow line accounted for $1,320,624 and the "The Wizard
of Oz" collectors tins accounted for $422,275. Toast `N Jammers sales were
$773,920 in 1998, an increase of 12.1% over the prior year. Caketts and Fudgets
combined for 1997 revenues of $754,408, but, both brands were discontinued in
1998 due to the recurring quality control problems of the past and the damage
done to both brands.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit in 1998 was $985,073 or 34.4% of sales, compared to a gross
profit of $98,907 in 1997 or 5.0% of sales. This increase of $886,166 was due
to two significant factors. The gross profit margin of the new "The Wizard of
Oz" brand products manufactured in Mexico provides a higher profit margin than
the product mix from 1997 and the returns and allowances caused by the quality
control problems associated with Keebler's manufacturing were greatly reduced
from 1997 to 1998.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Research and Development
In 1998, product development expenses were $362,770 compared to $337,806 in
1997, an increase of $24,964 or 7.4%.
Sales and Marketing
The Company experienced an increase in sales and marketing expenses from
$1,239,460 in 1997 to $2,035,125 in 1998. Part of this 64.2% increase was
due to the additional sales and marketing costs
14
<PAGE>
associated with the acquisition of Global International in 1998, which accounted
for $576,706 of the total cost. Additional cost variances included the
commission and royalties paid to Warner Bros. for the licensing rights to "The
Wizard of Oz" and the broker commission for selling these products. These
licensing and commission expenses were $132,299 in 1998, a significant increase
over 1997. There was also a 43% increase in promotional expenses from $116,393
in 1997 to $184,792 in 1998; this was due primarily to the off-invoice
promotions of "The Wizard of Oz" marshmallows.
General and Administrative
General and Administrative costs in 1997 were $2,672,946, compared to costs
in 1998 of $2,557,890. This 4.3% decrease is primarily due to a reduction in
consulting and professional services.
INCOME TAXES
As of December 31, 1998, the Company had unused Federal and California net
operating loss carryforwards of approximately $24,300,000 and $11,100,000,
respectively, available to offset future Federal taxable income and future
California taxable income. The unused net operating loss and credit
carryforwards expire in various amounts through the year 2013. In contrast to
Federal net operating losses, only 50% of the California net operating losses
incurred subsequent to December 31, 1986 may be carried forward. The California
net operating losses will expire in various amounts through the year 2003.
Net deferred tax assets of approximately $8,600,000 resulting from net
operating losses have been offset by a valuation allowance since management
cannot determine whether it is more likely than not such assets will be
realized.
Due to restrictions imposed by the Internal Revenue Code regarding
substantial changes in ownership of companies with loss carryforwards, the
utilization of the above-mentioned net operating losses may be limited as a
result of changes in stock ownership. The annual utilization of these losses is
limited to an amount equal to the estimated fair value (for income tax purposes)
of the Company at the point of stock ownership change, multiplied by the long-
term tax-exempt rate then in effect. The annual limitation has not been
quantified at this time.
INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE
Interest income was $39,591 in 1998 and $78,070 in 1997. The proceeds from
the Keebler arbitration have been invested in short term government securities
which do not carry high interest rates, but are almost risk free. These
proceeds have beenused to fund the Company's operations in 1998.
Interest expense was $221,547 in 1998 compared to $214,690 in 1997. In
1998, the amount of $143,549 was paid to Coast Business Bank as per the lending
agreement. The initial agreement has been amended so that the minimum amount of
monthly interest charged is based on a minimum borrowing base of $1,000,000 and
an interest rate of 3% over the Bank of America NT-rate. The current agreement
has been extended to April 1999, and the Company plans to negotiate new terms
for the lending agreement. The balance of $ 113,016 paid in 1998 relates to
cost of purchase order financing and various other notes given to
suppliers.
15
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
December 31,
1998 1997
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Net Cash From (Used In) Operations $(3,569,962) $1,790,893
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (282,164) (214,095)
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities 2,556,739 433,371
Working Capital (Deficit) (615,028) 1,503,938
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1998 the Company had cash of $903,649. This reflects a
significant decrease from the prior year cash balance of $2,199,036. This
decrease is due to the $4,258,005 operating loss suffered by the Company in
1998. This loss was financed by borrowings of approximately $2,100,000, proceeds
of $499,000 from issuance of preferred shares, and approximately $750,000
realized from the issuance of common stock in exchange for services and in
repayment of liabilities.
The Company is continuing to improve its relationships with its brokers and
customers (distributors), but the effort must be focused in accelerating the
sales process to get the company to a break even position. Although the vendor
relationships are now stable, the Company may again jeopardize this area should
the liquidity problem again become extreme.
The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations as of December
31, 1998. Although the Company has raised additional capital at the end
1998 (see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), it has not
generated sufficient revenue-producing activity to sustain its operations. The
Company's independent certified public accountants have included a modification
to their opinion which indicates there is substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. See Note 2 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information. The Company is attempting to
raise additional capital to meet future working capital requirements, but may
not be able to do so. Should the Company not be able to raise additional
capital, it may have to severely curtail operations.
CREDIT FACILITY
In August 1996, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility with
Coast Business Credit, that provides a credit line of up to $4,000,000 subject
to certain covenants. Advances made to the Company under the facility are based
on a certain percentage of eligible accounts receivable, as defined, and a
certain percentage of eligible inventory, as defined. The amount of inventory
advances under the facility cannot exceed $500,000. The initial term of the
facility ended August 1998, and has been extended to April 30, 1999. Advances
under the facility bear an interest rate at prime at the Bank of America NT
(7.75%) at December 31, 1998) plus 3%, and are secured by a first priority lien
on all of the Company's assets. Minimum interest charges are currently based on
a minimum borrowing base of $1,000,000 at the same interest rate per month.
The Bank agreed to eliminate from its collateral the inventory to be used
for the Purchase Order Financing discussed below. The Company is in negotiations
with the Bank and other potential lenders to receive more favorable terms than
under the previous agreement.
As of December 31, 1996 and subsequently, the Company was in violation of
certain covenants in that it had not maintained minimum tangible net worth of at
least $1,500,000 and minimum working capital of $1,000,000.
16
<PAGE>
YEAR 2000
The Company's accounting software currently does not utilize a four digit
year field; however, the Company has been assured by the software manufacturer
and independent consultants that all necessary modifications for the year 2000
have been or will be made and tested timely. The Company has been advised by a
consultant that the hardware will be modified timely. The Company does not
expect the cost of these modifications will have a material effect on its
financial position or results of operations. The Company currently does not
interact electronically with either customers, suppliers or other entities that
could be impacted by Year 2000 issues. Should any of the Company's internal
systems fail to achieve Year 2000 compliance, the Company's business and results
of operations could be adversely impacted.
The Company is in the process of contacting its key suppliers and other
important parties with whom business occurs with respect to their year 2000
compliance. If inquiries of these key suppliers indicate they may have
significant year 2000 issues, the Company will need to develop a contingency
plan for obtaining supplies should those sources be interrupted. If year 2000
issues prevent these key suppliers from timely
17
<PAGE>
filling the Company's needs, and if alternative sources of such supplies or
services are not readily available, the Company may be forced to curtail its
operations. An extended interruption in the Company's operations would have a
material adverse impact.
RECENT NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Disclosure of Information About Capital Structure
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 129, "Disclosure of
Information about Capital Structure," ("SFAS 129") issued by the FASB is
effective for financial statements with fiscal years ending after December 15,
1997. The new standard reinstates various securities disclosure requirements
previously in effect under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15, which has
been superceded by SFAS No. 128. The Company adopted SFAS No. 129 on December
15, 1997 and it did not have any effect on its financial position or results of
operations.
Reporting Comprehensive Income
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 130, "Reporting
Comprehensive Income," ("SFAS 130") issued by the FASB is effective for
financial statements with fiscal years ending after December 15, 1997. SFAS 130
establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its
components in a full set of general-purpose financial statements. The Company
adopted SFAS 130 on January 1, 1998 and it did not have any effect on its
financial position or results of operations.
Disclosures About Segments Of An Enterprise And Related Information
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" ("SFAS 131") issued by the
FASB is effective for financial statements with fiscal years ending after
December 15, 1997. SFAS 131 requires that public companies report certain
information about operating segments, products, services and geographical areas
in which they operate and their major customers. The Company adopted SFAS 131
on January 1, 1998, and it did not have any effect on its financial position or
results of operations as the Company operates in one business segment. The
Company is providing the other footnote disclosures required by SFAS 131.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEE "INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS" BEGINNING ON PAGE F-1
None.
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
18
<PAGE>
ITEM 9: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL
PERSONS, COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Positions Held
----------------------- --- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Mark Beychok 42 President, CEO, CFO and a Director
Paul G. Cowen 65 Director
Benjamin Tabatchnick 46 Director
John Coppolino 38 Executive Vice President and a Director
Valerie A. Broadbent 60 Secretary
</TABLE>
Mark Beychok was elected President and a Director of the Company in
------------
September of 1993, and has been Chief Executive Officer since February 1995.
Mr. Beychok is a private investor with fifteen years experience in the food
industry as an owner and operator of various food manufacturing, marketing and
distribution companies. Mr. Beychok graduated in 1979 from the Haas Business
School at the University of California (Berkeley).
Paul G. Cowen was elected a director in January 1998. Mr. Cowen was the
-------------
founder of Paul Cowen Associates in 1984, an executive recruitment firm. Prior
to that, Mr. Cowen was in senior marketing and sales positions at Xerox and
Vivitar. Mr. Cowen has a BA from Ohio University and an MS from Indiana
University.
Benjamin Tabatchnick was elected a Director of the Company in February
--------------------
1997. Since January 1990, Mr. Tabatchnick has owned and operated Tabatchnick's
Fine Foods (and predecessors), a privately held concern, which manufactures and
distributes its own trademarked line of frozen soups, and manufactures frozen
and refrigerated foods for others on a contract basis.
19
<PAGE>
John Coppolino was elected a Director in February 1999. Mr. Coppolino
--------------
began as Director of Sales in 1994 and became Executive Vice President during
September 1997. Mr. Coppolino has over ten years experience in the food
industry, including experience as a food broker and in product manufacture. Mr.
Coppolino graduated from the Pennsylvania State University School of Business in
1983 with a degree in Business Logistics.
Valerie A. Broadbent was elected as Secretary of the Company in February
--------------------
1999. Ms. Broadbent began as Assistant to the COO/CFO in October 1997 and
became Executive Administrator in February 1999. Ms. Broadbent has over twenty-
five years experience working in corporate administration and as executive
assistant to senior management for both public and private companies.
ITEM 10: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
On December 1, 1993, the Company entered into a three-year employment
agreement with Mark Beychok which provided for an annual base salary of
$150,000, the grant of an option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at
$5.00 per share (as adjusted for the reverse stock split effected in 1996), and
$1,000,000 of life insurance, the proceeds of which will be split equally
between the employee's beneficiary and the Company. In December 1995, in
recognition of Mr. Beychok's deferral of his compensation during 1995 and his
assuming additional responsibilities within the Company, Mr. Beychok's
employment agreement was amended to grant him an additional 62,500 five-year
options with an exercise price of $3.00 (as adjusted for the reverse stock split
effected in 1996), a price equal to the offering price in the Company's then on-
going private placement. In November 1995, Mr. Beychok agreed to convert his
accrued salary to stock and options on the same terms as the Company's on-going
equity bridge financing. The Company's Board of Directors approved this
transaction in December 1995. In such connection, Mr. Beychok converted $45,821
of accrued salary into 19,092 shares; 9,547 options with an exercise price of
$4.50; and 9,547 options with an exercise price of $6.00. In September 1997,
Mr. Beychok entered into a new employment agreement ("Agreement") with the
Company for three years. Under the Agreement, Mr. Beychok receives an annual
base salary of $150,000 and was granted options for 450,000 shares of stock at
an exercise price of $0.87 per share. Such options vest 75,000 each on
September 3, 1997, March 3, 1998, September 3, 1998, March 3, 1999, September 3,
1999, and March 3, 2000. In May 1997 the price of all options other than those
related to the private placement were repriced to $0.91. In November 1998 the
price of all options other than those related to the private placement were
repriced to $0.10. In September 1997 Mr. Beychok was given a successful
litigation reward of $51,535 plus 100,000 shares of common stock at fair market
value of $1.00.
In August 1996, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John
Coppolino, which was dated January 1, 1996. Under his agreement, which is for a
one year term, with two one year renewal terms at the option of the Company, Mr.
Coppolino received an initial salary of $102,000; and, is entitled to annual
increases of 5-6% based on increases in the cost of living. Mr. Coppolino's
employment agreement provided for the grant of 225,000 options, expiring
December 31, 2000 for the purchase of common stock at $3.00 (as adjusted for the
reverse stock split effected in October 1996). Of these options: (i) 56,250
have vested (ii) 56,250 have lapsed and (iii) 56,250 will vest on each of
January 1, 1998 and January 1, 1999, subject to the Company meeting certain
performance criteria. In May 1997 the Board of Directors reduced the option
price of all unlapsed options to $0.91 and removed the vesting requirement. In
September 1997, Mr. Coppolino entered into a new employment agreement
("Agreement") with the Company for two years. Under the Agreement, Mr.
Coppolino receives an annual base salary of $120,000, and was granted options
for 300,000 shares of stock at an exercise price of $0.87 per share. Such
options vest 75,000 each on September 3, 1997, March 3, 1998, September 3, 1998,
and March 3, 1999. In November 1998 the price of all options were repriced to
$0.10. In September 1997, Mr. Coppolino was given a successful litigation
reward of $25,000, forgiveness of debt of $25,000, plus 25,000 shares of common
stock at $1.00, being the fair market value at the date of the award.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
compensation paid by the Company to Messrs. Beychok and Coppolino (the "named
individuals") during 1998, 1997 and 1996:
20
<PAGE>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
--------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Principal Position All Other Annual
& Name Year Salary Other Compensation
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CEO / President
Mark Beychok 1998 $150,000 $ - $ 28,317 (1)
1997 150,000 12,500 (2) $102,467 (3)
1996 137,500 12,500 (4) 8,864 (5)
Executive Vice President
John Coppolino 1998 $120,000 $ - $19,003 (6)
1997 120,000 20,750 (7) 59,000 (8)
1996 87,500 14,500 (9) 9,000 (10)
</TABLE>
(1) Comprised of $15,600 car allowance and accrued vacation of $12,717.
(2) A portion of Mr. Beychok's salary was deferred in 1996 and paid in 1997.
(3) Comprised of $9,584 car allowance, accrued vacation of $41,348, plus
$51,535 as a successful litigation reward.
(4) A portion of Mr. Beychok's salary was deferred in 1995 and paid in 1996.
(5) Comprised of $8,204 car allowance and $660 in medical insurance benefits.
(6) Comprised of $9,000 car allowance and accrued vacation of $10,003.
(7) A portion of Mr. Coppolino's salary, $15,500, and car allowance, $5,250,
were deferred in 1996 and paid in 1997.
(8) Comprised of $9,000 car allowance and $50,000 as a successful litigation
reward.
(9) Mr. Coppolino deferred a portion of his salary and exercised stock options
in 1996.
(10) Comprised of $9,000 car allowance.
STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Company adopted its 1989 Stock Option Plan (the "1989 Plan") pursuant
to which 12,500 shares of common stock (as adjusted for the reverse stock split
effected in 1996) were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options.
Options granted under the 1989 Plan may, at the discretion of the Board, be
incentive stock options ("ISO's") within the meaning of Section 422A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), or non-incentive stock
options. In June 1991, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the
number of options available for grant under the 1989 Plan to 50,000 (as adjusted
for the reverse stock split effected in 1996). No options are outstanding under
this plan.
In 1995, the Company adopted the 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "1995 Plan")
pursuant to which 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock (as adjusted for the reverse
stock split effected in 1996) were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of
options. The 1995 Plan is similar to the 1989 Plan in many respects and in the
discussion below, each is referred to as a "Plan" and they are collectively
referred to as the "Plans".
Under the terms of the Plans, all directors, officers and key employees of,
and consultants to, the Company and all its subsidiaries are eligible for option
grants. The Board determines, at its discretion, which persons will receive
option grants, the number of shares subject to each option, the exercise price,
which may not be less than the par value of the shares subject to the option,
except that in the case of ISO's, the exercise price must be at least one
hundred percent (100%) of the fair market value of the optioned shares on the
date of grant, or one hundred and ten percent (110%) of such fair market value
if the optionee is the owner of more than ten percent (10%) of the total
combined voting power of all classes of voting stock of the Company (a "10%
Holder"), and the term (which may not be more than ten (10) years from the date
of grant, or five (5) years in the case of an ISO granted to a 10% holder)
thereof. The Plans permit options granted thereunder to be exercised by the
tender of shares of common stock having a fair market value equal to the
exercise price of such option.
21
<PAGE>
Options granted under the Plans may, at the discretion of the Board, be
exercisable upon the tender of cash equal in amount to the aggregate par value
of the shares covered by such options, together with a one-year note bearing
interest at the "applicable federal rate" (as defined in the Code) and providing
for a required prepayment upon any disposition of the acquired shares.
Presently, the Board does not have a stock option committee.
During 1995 Mr. Beychok was granted an aggregate of 687,500 options under
the 1995 Plan with an exercise price of $3.00 (as adjusted for the reverse stock
split effected in October 1996). The exercise price of these options was
reduced to $0.91 in May 1997. In November 1998, the Company reduced the
exercise price of all outstanding options held by officers and directors to
$.10, the then market price of the Company's common stock.
The following chart sets forth the options granted to directors and
officers in 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Percent of Potential realized value
securities total at assumed annual rate of
underlying options/SARs Exercise appreciation for
options/ granted to of base option term
SARs employees in price Expiration
Name granted fiscal year ($/Share) Date 5% 10%
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benjamin Tabatchnick 50,000 5.6% $0.10 02/17/02 823 1,735
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Cowen 50,000 5.6% $0.10 01/29/03 1,103 2,381
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Cowen 150,000 17.1% $0.10 04/30/01 1,814 3,749
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valerie Broadbent 21,000 2.4% $0.085 01/29/03 394 850
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valerie Broadbent 54,000 6.1% $0.085 10/29/03 1,013 2,186
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The following chart sets forth certain information with respect to
options/warrants outstanding at December 31, 1998 to the named individuals:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying In-the-Money
Unexercised Options/SAR's at
Shares Options/SARs at FY-End
Acquired on Value FY-End Exercisable/ Exercisable/
Name Exercise Realized Unexercisable Unexercisable
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mark Beychok -0- $-0- 1,155,625/225,000 346,688/67,500
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Coppolino -0- $-0- 463,750/75,000 139,125/22,500
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benjamin Tabatchnick -0- $-0- 150,000/100,000 45,000/30,000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Cowen -0- $-0- 100,000/100,000 30,000/30,000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valerie Broadbent -0- $-0- 50,000/25,000 15,750/7,875
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
ITEM 11: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the ownership of the common stock by each
director and by entities or persons known to the Company to own beneficially in
excess of 5% of such stock and by all officers and directors as a group, as of
December 31, 1998. Except as otherwise indicated, all stockholders have sole
22
<PAGE>
voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed as beneficially
owned by them, subject to the rights of spouses under applicable community
property laws.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and Address Number of Shares Percentage of
of Beneficial Owner of Common Stock Beneficial
Identity of Group Beneficially Owned Ownership
- ----------------- ------------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Mark Beychok (1) 1,155,625 (2) 5.9%
Paul G. Cowen (1) 100,000 (3) .5%
Benjamin Tabatchnick (1) 100,000 (3) .5%
John Coppolino (1) 493,750 (4) 2.5%
Valerie A. Broadbent (1) 50,000 (5) .2%
Terra Healthy Living, Ltd. 5,733,743 (6) 29.2%
All directors and officers as a group.
(5 persons) (2)(3)(4)(5) and (6) 38.8%
</TABLE>
(1) The address of these persons is 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 480, Los
Angeles, California 90067.
(2) Includes (i) 62,500 shares underlying a currently exercisable option with
an exercise price of $0.10 per share, which expires on December 16, 2000; (ii)
15,000 shares underlying a currently exercisable option with an exercise price
of $0.10 per share which expires on September 29, 1999; (iii) 100,000 shares
underlying a currently exercisable option with an exercise price of $0.10 per
share which expires on November 15, 1999; (iv) 150,000 shares underlying the
currently exercisable portion of a stock option, expiring December 16, 2000,
which has an exercise price of $0.10 per share; (v) 403,125 shares underlying
the currently exercisable portion of a stock option, expiring December 16, 2000,
which has an exercise price of $0.10 per share; (vi) 100,000 shares underlying a
currently exercisable option with an exercise price of $0.10 which expires on
June 16, 2002; (vii) 100,000 shares underlying a currently exercisable option
with an exercise price of $.10which expires on December 31, 2002; and (viii)
225,000 shares underlying a currently exercisable option with an exercise price
of $0.10 which expires September 1, 2002 and does not include 225,000 shares
underlying options which are not currently exercisable with an exercise price of
$0.10 expiring September 1, 2002.
(3) Each of Messrs. Tabatchnick and Cowen holds a currently exercisable option
for the purchase of 50,000 shares at $0.10 granted in 1998. Mr. Tabatchnick
holds a currently exercisable option for an additional 50,000 shares at $0.10
granted in 1997, and has entered into a consulting agreement which provides for
the issuance of 50,000 shares, subject to forfeiture if certain performance
standards relating to sales into certain markets are not met. Mr. Cowen was
granted an option in 1998 for the purchase of 150,000 shares at $0.10 of which
50,000 are currently exercisable.
(4) Includes (i) 168,750 shares underlying a currently exercisable option with
an exercise price of $0.10 per share, which expires on December 16, 2000; (ii)
70,000 shares underlying a currently exercisable option with an exercise price
of $0.10 which expires on June 16, 2002; (iii) 225,000 shares underlying a
currently exercisable option with an exercise price of $0.10 which expires on
September 1, 2002; and does not include (iv) 75,000 shares with an exercise
price of $0.10 which are not currently exercisable expiring September 1, 2002.
(5) Includes (i) 21,000 shares underlying a currently exercisable option
with an exercise price of $0.085 per share, which expire on January 29, 2003;
(ii) 4,000 shares underlying a currently exercisable option with an exercise
price of $0.085 which expire on October 29, 2003; (iii) 25,000 shares with a
currently exercisable price of $0.085 which expire on October 29, 2003. It
does not include 25,000 shares with an exercise price of $.085, which are not
currently exercisable, expiring October 29, 2003.
23
<PAGE>
(6) Includes 500,000 shares underlying an option with an exercise price of $.25
per share which expires in December 2004. Includes 2,000,000 shares which are
subject to redemption by the Company pursuant to an agreement. See "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions." The foregoing is based upon a report on
Schedule 13D filed by Terra Healthy Living, Ltd. on February 8, 1999.
The following table sets forth the ownership of the Series B Preferred
Stock by each director and by each entity or person known to the Company to own
beneficially in excess of 5% of such class of stock and by all officers and
directors as a group. To the Company's knowledge, all stockholders have sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed as owned by them,
subject to applicable community property laws.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title of Class Name and Address of Number of Percentage
Beneficial Owner Shares Owned Of Class
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Thomas Von Ledersteger
Series B Preferred Stock 23 Chemin des Meandres 500 50%
CH-1287 Laconnex/GE, Switzerland
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pictet et CIE
Series B. Preferred Stock 29 Boulevard Georges Favon 500 50%
CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All officers and directors as a group
Series B Preferred Stock (5 persons) 0 0%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 Series A All officers and directors as a group
Preferred Stock (5persons) 0 0%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
ITEM 12: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company has employment agreements with Mark Beychok and John Coppolino,
and had employment agreements, consulting agreements and settlement agreements
with certain of its former officers. See "Management - Executive Compensation."
In April, 1997, the Company agreed in principle with ATCOLP INVESTMENT
PARTNERS, a California Limited Partnership (the "Lender), in which Donald Wohl,
a Director of the Company at the time, is the general partner, for a loan in the
amount of $300,000 (the "Loan"), to fund the payment of legal fees in connection
with the Company's arbitration against The Keebler Company. The loan was
evidenced by a note which bears interest at the lesser of 15% per annum or the
highest rate allowed by law with recourse solely to the net proceeds of the
arbitration, if any. If the Company did not realize any net proceeds from the
arbitration, the Loan would be canceled and the Lender would receive a warrant
for the purchase of 400,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at $.01 per
share. If the Loan was repaid through the application of the net proceeds of the
arbitration, the Lender would receive warrants for the purchase of 200,000
shares of Common Stock at $.01 per share and a percentage of net proceeds of the
arbitration equal to 15% of the first $1,000,000 of net proceeds, but not less
than $100,000; 20% of the net proceeds greater than $1,000,000 and less than
$3,000,000; and, 25% of net proceeds above $3,000,000. The Loan was approved by
the disinterested members of the Company's Board of Directors, and was on terms
no less favorable to the Company than were available from non-affiliated
lenders. A second proposal, from another source, contained terms which would
have required the Company to pay $2,050,000 in fees based on the actual award,
repay the $300,000 advance, and be granted a warrant for 1,000,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at an exercise price of $1.00. The loan amount of
$300,000 was repaid upon settlement of the litigation in June 1997 and receipt
of funds in July 1997, plus $1,236,883 in conformity with the agreed upon
formula, plus a warrant for 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock
24
<PAGE>
at a $0.01 per share. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
the recording of the entire transaction.
The Company entered into a one year consulting agreement with Benjamin
Tabatchnick, a Director of the Company, on April 1, 1997. Mr. Tabatchnick, in
exchange for 50,000 shares of the Company's common stock plus 2% of the new
sales endeavors in the school and food service business areas, agreed to assist
the Company in developing programs, formulations, marketing and sales in the
above mentioned business areas.
The Company granted options in 1997 for 50,000 shares to Paul S. Hermis who
was then a Director of the Company. Mr. Hermis resigned as a Director on
February 21, 1998.
On January 22, 1999, the Company completed the Closing under a series of
agreements including a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the "CSPA"), dated as of
December 30, 1998, by and among the Company; Terra Healthy Living, Ltd, a B.V.I.
corporation ("Terra"); Sovereign Partners, a Connecticut limited partnership
("Sov"); and Dominion Capital Fund, Ltd., a Bahamian corporation ("Dom"). All
of the transactions contemplated by the CSPA were deemed to have occurred on
December 31, 1998. Pursuant to the CSPA:
Terra acquired 2,712,843 shares of the Company's common stock from Sov and
Dom for $235,000. Such shares were issued upon the conversion by Sov and Dom of
an aggregate of 235 shares of the Company's 1997 Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock ("Series A Preferred").
The Company borrowed $2,065,000 from Terra pursuant to a Promissory Note
With Warrant and Registration Rights (the "Terra Note"). The Terra Note is a
five year note bearing interest at 6% per annum. Interest on the Terra Note is
payable annually. The Terra Note provided for the issuance to Terra of a five
year warrant (the "Terra Warrant") for the purchase of 500,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at $.25 per share. The Terra Note further provides that
the first year's interest on the Terra Note shall be applied to the partial
exercise of the Terra Warrant. The Company and Terra have entered into a
Registration Rights Agreement requiring the registration under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act") of the securities issuable upon exercise of
the Terra Warrant.
The Company applied the $2,065,000 proceeds of the Terra Note to redeem all
1,351 remaining shares of Series A Preferred held by Sov and Dom as well as a
convertible debenture in the amount of $548,352 held by Dom pursuant to an
Agreement and Consent to Redeem Series A Preferred Stock and Debentures (the
"Redemption Agreement").
The aggregate of $2,300,000 paid by Terra in connection with its purchase
of the 2,712,843 shares of the Company's common stock from Sov and Dom and in
connection with the Terra Note was satisfied through the delivery to Sov and Dom
of marketable securities having a value of $2,300,000. Under the CSPA, Terra
made certain assurances to Sov and Dom and assumed certain obligations to assure
that Sov and Dom would realize $2,300,000 on the sale of the marketable
securities including the delivery of additional securities to them.
The Company borrowed $300,000 from each of Sov and Dom pursuant to a non-
negotiable nine month promissory note bearing interest at 8% per annum (the "Sov
Note" and the "Dom Note"). These notes provide for their repayment, at the
option of the Company, in free trading registered common stock which shall be
valued at the then market for such stock. The Sov Note and the Dom Note provide
for the issuance to each of Sov and Dom of 60,000 warrants which expire on
December 31, 2003, half of which are exercisable at $.40 and half of which are
exercisable at $.25. If the Company repays the Sov Note or the Dom Note with
common stock, then the exercise price of the $.25 warrant is reduced to $.01.
The Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Sov and Dom.
25
<PAGE>
The CSPA granted the Company the right to redeem up to 2,000,000 of the
shares of its common stock acquired by Terra through June 30, 2000 based upon a
formula related to the market price of the common stock at the time of
conversion.
The Company issued 571,232 shares of its common stock to Sov in connection
with the prior conversion of 40 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
In December 1998, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares to Terra Healthy
Living, Ltd., a principal stockholder, for $250,000 (or $.25 per share) which
was paid by delivery to the Company of marketable securities. The Company
believes that the price paid for such shares was no less favorable to the
Company than that which would have been paid by an unaffiliated purchaser.
PART IV
ITEM 13: EXHIBITS LIST
-------------
(a) The following exhibits are submitted herewith:
3.l Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant(i)
3.2 By-laws of Registrant(i)
3.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Registrant and
Vitafort International Corporation, a California corporation(i)
3.4 Certificate of Designation Series A Preferred Stock(v)
3.5 Certificate of Designation Series B Preferred Stock(v)
3.6 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation,
November 1991(v)
3.7 Certificate of Designation Series C Preferred Stock(v)
3.8 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, filed
February 8, 1994 (vi)
3.9 Certificate of Designation - Series D Preferred Stock(vi)
3.10 Certificate of Amendment to the Registrant's Certificate of
Incorporation, filed November, 1995. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.10 filed with the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-8 filed January 25, 1996 File Number 33-300435 (the "
January 1996 S-8").
3.11 Certificate of Elimination - Series A Preferred Stock. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 Filed May 22, 1996 File Number 333-04271
(the "May 1996 S-8").
3.12 Certificate of Elimination - Series D Preferred Stock. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to the May 1996 S-8.
3.13 Certificate of Amendment to the Registrant's Certificate of
Incorporation, filed October 4, 1996. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.29 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-8 Filed December 12, 1996, File Number 333-17763 (the
"December 1996 S-8").
3.14 Amended Certificate of Designation of the Registrant's 1997 Series A
Preferred Stock filed May 1997 (ix)
3.15 Amended Certificate of Designation of the Registrant's 1997 Series A
Preferred Stock filed March 1998 (xii)
3.16 Amended Certificate of Designation of the Registrant's 1997 Series A
Preferred Stock filed October 1998 (xiii)
3.17 Convertible Debenture dated August 1998 (xiii)
4.1 Specimen Stock Certificate. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 Filed with the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10K-SB for the Year ended December 31, 1996 (the "1996 10K-SB")
4.2 Specimen Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant(i)
26
<PAGE>
4.3 Form of Warrant Agreement(i)
4.4 Proposed form of Underwriters Warrant Agreement(i)
4.5
4.6 Warrant Extension Agreement, December 18, 1992(v)
4.7 Warrant Extension Agreement, December 18, 1994(vi)
4.8 Warrant Extension Agreement, January 18, 1995(vi)
4.9 Warrant Extension Agreement, April 3, 1995(vi)
4.10 Warrant Extension Agreement, May 3, 1995. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.18 to the January 1996 S-8.
4.11 Warrant Extension Agreement, June 15, 1995. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.19 to the January 1996 S-8.
4.12 Warrant Extension Agreement, July 17, 1995. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.20 to the January 1996 S-8.
4.13 Warrant Extension Agreement, August 16, 1995. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.21 to the January 1996 S-8.
4.14 Warrant Extension Agreement, December 31, 1995. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.21 to the January 1996 S-8.
4.15 Warrant Extension Agreement, April 30, 1996. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.23 to the May 1996 S-8.
4.16 Warrant Extension Agreement, July 31, 1996. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.26 to the December 1996 S-8.
4.17 Warrant Extension Agreement, September 30, 1996. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.27 to the December 1996 S-8.
4.18 Warrant Extension Agreement, November 11, 1996. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.28 to the December 1996 S-8.
4.19 Warrant Extension Agreement, April 15, 1997. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.19 to the 1996 10K-SB.
4.20 Warrant Extension Agreement, October 31, 1997.(x)
10.1 Loan Agreement, dated August 19, 1988, between the Registrant and
Bishop Capital, L.P. and promissory note in the principal amount
of $150,000(i)
10.2 License Agreement, dated April 25, 1986, between the Registrant and
Crystal Geyser Water Registrant and amendment, dated January 7,
1988(i)
10.3 Demand Promissory Note, dated July 10, 1987, from Registrant to
Joseph R. Daly in the principal amount of $300,000 and Modification,
dated October 11, 1989(i)
10.4 License Agreement, dated as of October 9, 1987, between the
Registrant and Good Health Beverage, Inc. and amendment, dated
November 23, 1988(i)
10.5 Product Development Agreement, dated as of January 21, 1988, between
the Registrant and International Multifoods, Inc.(i)
10.6 Beverage Agreement, dated as of October 31, 1988, between the
Registrant and PowerBurst Corporation(i)
10.7 Amended and Restated Agreement, dated August 2, 1989, between the
Registrant and Vitafort Far East Co., Ltd.(i)
10.8 Agreement, dated August 11, 1989, between Barry Saltzman, MD. and
Yoshio Tanaka(i)
10.9 Lease, dated June 13, 1988, between Registrant and Shelterpoint
Equities, Ltd. for offices at 591 Redwood Highway, Mill Valley,
California(i)
10.10 Agreement, dated July 25, 1989, between Nutrifish Corporation and
Mt. Lassen Trout Farms(i)
10.11 Salmon Rondelles Joint Development and Marketing Agreement, dated as
of September 18, 1989, between Nutrifish Corporation and
Norwegian Seafoods, Inc.(i)
10.12 Whole Salmon Joint Development and Marketing Agreement, dated as of
September 26, 1989, between Nutrifish Corporation and Norwegian
Seafoods, Inc.(i)
10.13 Employment Agreement, dated September 13, between the Registrant and
Barry K. Saltzman(i)
27
<PAGE>
10.14 Employment Agreement, dated September 13, between the Registrant
and Jeffrey Lewenthal(i)
10.15 The Registrant's 1989 Stock Option Plan(i)
10.16 Stock Option Agreement, dated as of July 17, 1989 between the
Registrant and Jeffrey Lewenthal(i)
10.17 Secrecy Agreement, dated as of May 2, 1986, between the Registrant
and Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc.(i)
10.18 Joint Venture Agreement, dated September 29, 1989, between the
Registrant and Agrolife Technologies, Inc.(i)
10.19 Consulting Agreement, dated September 13, 1989, between the
Registrant and Randall S. Reis(i)
10.20 Loan Agreement, dated June 15, 1989, between Union Bank and Joseph
R. Daly(i)
10.21 Form of Employee Confidentiality Agreement.(ii)
10.23 Form of Escrow Agreement by and among the Registrant, Gilford
Securities Corp., and certain stockholders of Registrant(i)
10.24 Promissory Note, made November 21, 1989, by Nutrifish Corporation
and payable to Joseph R. Daly(i)
10.25 Right of First Refusal Agreement, dated November 21, 1989, between
Nutrifish Corporation and Joseph R. Daly(i)
10.26 Production License Agreement for Nutrifish Norwegian Salmon, dated
February 2, 1990, between Nutrifish Corporation and Norwegian
Seafoods, Inc.(ii)
10.27 Test Market Agreement, dated December 19, 1989, between
International Multifoods Corporation and the Registrant.(ii)
10.28 Amendment, dated as of December 19, 1989, to the Product
Development Agreement between International Multifoods
Corporation and the Registrant.(ii)
10.29 Consulting Agreement, dated February 21, 1990, between the
Registrant and Joseph R. Daly.(ii)
10.30 License Agreement between the Registrant and Nulaid Foods, Inc.,
dated April 30, 1990.(ii)
10.31 License Agreement between the Registrant and Vitafort Latin America,
dated July 30, 1990.(ii)
10.32 Termination Agreement between the Registrant and Jeffrey D.
Lewenthal, dated September 12, 1990.(ii)
10.33 Settlement Agreement and Full Release between Nicholas J. Caputo and
Registrant, dated October 4, 1990.(ii)
10.34 Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Stephen D. Clow,
dated December 1, 1990.(ii)
10.35 Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Frank A. Corsini,
dated January 2, 1991.(ii)
10.36 Stock Option Agreement between the Registrant and Stephen D. Clow,
dated January 2, 1991.(ii)
10.37 Stock Option Agreement between the Registrant and Frank A. Corsini,
dated January 2, 1991.(ii)
10.38 Letter Agreement, dated February 1, 1991, amending Consulting
Agreement between the Registrant and Joseph R. Daly.(ii)
10.39 Letter Agreement, dated March 12, 1991, between the Registrant and
Joseph R. Daly regarding debt reorganization.(ii)
10.40 Consulting Agreement between Norman Kretchmer, MD., Ph.D., and the
Registrant, dated December 20, 1988.(ii)
10.41 Settlement Agreement between the Registrant and PowerBurst
Corporation, dated September 23, 1991.(ii)
10.42 Subscription Agreement between the Registrant and Societe Anonyme
Financier Industrielle et Garantie, dated November 1, 1991.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Registrant's Report
on Form 8-K dated November 1, 1991.
10.43 Exclusive Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Chicago Fish
House, dated June 13, 1991.(ii)
10.44 Larry Lucas Settlement Agreement, dated March 25, 1993.(v)
28
<PAGE>
10.45 Frank Corsini, Separation Agreement, dated May 18, 1993.(v)
10.46 Agreement dated October 5, 1993 between the Registrant and Second
Nature Technologies, Inc.(iii)
10.47 Food and Beverage Technology Agreement(iii)
10.48 Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of June 7, 1993 by and
among Crystal Clear Farms, Inc., a Maine corporation, the
Registrant and Salmon Distribution Subsidiary, Inc. a Maine
corporation which was formerly known as Crystal Clear Farms,
Inc.(iv)
10.49 Temporary Operating Agreement dated June 7, 1993 by and among
Samuel L. Thompson & Associates, Inc., a Maine corporation, the
Registrant and Crystal Clear Farms, Inc. a Maine corporation (now
known as Salmon distribution Subsidiary, Inc.)(iv)
10.50 Non-Competition Agreement dated July 27, 1993 by and between the
Registrant and Crystal clear farms, Inc., a Maine
corporation.(iv)
10.51 Employment Agreement dated as of November 29, 1993, between the
Registrant and Steven Westlund. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.01 to Form S-8 filed by the Registrant on March 4,
1994 (the "1994 S-8").
10.52 Stock Option Agreement dated as of November 29, 1993 between the
Registrant and Steven Westlund. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.02 to the 1994 S-8.
10.53 Stock Option Agreement dated as of September 15, 1993 between the
Registrant and Steven Westlund. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.03 to 1994 S-8.
10.54 Employment Agreement dated as of November 29, 1993 between the
Registrant and Peter Benz. Incorporated by reference to exhibit
99.04 to 1994 S-8.
10.55 Stock Option Agreement dated as of November 29, 1993 between the
Registrant and Peter Benz. Incorporated by reference to exhibit
99.05 to 1994 S-8.
10.56 Employment Agreement dated as of November 29, 1993 between the
Registrant and Mark Beychok. Incorporated by reference to exhibit
99.06 to the 1994 S-8.
10.57 Stock Option Agreement dated as of November 29, 1993 between the
Registrant and Mark Beychok. Incorporated by reference to exhibit
99.07 to the 1994 S-8.
10.58 Stock Option Agreement dated as of September 15, 1993 between the
Registrant and Mark Beychok. Incorporated by reference to exhibit
99.08 to the 1994 S-8.
10.59 Consulting Agreement dated as of November 29, 1993 between the
Registrant and Herman Jacobs. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.09 to the 1994 S-8.
10.60 Stock Option Agreement dated as of November 29, 1993 between the
Registrant and Herman Jacobs. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.10 to the 1994 S-8.
10.61 Vitafort International Corporation 90 Day Operating Plan.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.21 to the 1994 S-8.
10.62 Stock Option Agreement, dated September 15, 1993, between the
Registrant and Stanley J. Pasarell. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.22 to the 1994 S-8.
10.63 Separation and Release Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1994,
between the Registrant and Peter Benz.(vi)
10.64 Letter Agreement, dated September 14, 1995, between the Registrant
and Peter T. Benz. Incorporated by reference to the like
numbered exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 1995.
10.65 Consulting Agreement and Mutual Release, dated as of March 1, 1995,
between the Registrant and Steven R. Westlund. Incorporated by
reference to the like numbered exhibit to the Registrant's Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1995.
10.66 Letter Agreement, dated November 30, 1995, between the Registrant
and Steven Westlund. Incorporated by reference to the like
numbered exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 1995.
10.67 The Vitafort International Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan.
Incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.01 to the January 1996 S-
8.
10.68 Form of Option granted to directors under The Vitafort International
Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan and schedule of grants to
directors. Incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.02 to the
January 1996 S-8.
29
<PAGE>
10.69 Employee Option granted to Mark Beychok under The Vitafort
International Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated
by reference to exhibit 99.03 to the January 1996 S-8.
10.70 Amendment, dated December 16, 1995, to the Employment Agreement
between the Registrant and Mark Beychok. Incorporated by
reference to exhibit 99.10 to the January 1996 S-8.
10.71 Option Agreement, dated December 16, 1995, between the Registrant
and Mark Beychok. Incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.11 to
the January 1996 S-8.
10.72 Conversion Agreement, dated as of December 30, 1995, between the
Registrant and Mark Beychok. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.20 to the January 1996 S-8.
10.73 Class A Option Agreement, dated as of December 30, 1995, between the
Registrant and Mark Beychok. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.21 to the January 1996 S-8.
10.74 Class B Option Agreement, dated as of December 30, 1995, between the
Registrant and Mark Beychok. Incorporated by reference to
exhibit 99.22 to the January 1996 S-8.
10.75 Conversion Agreement, dated as of March 26, 1996, between the
Registrant and John Coppolino. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 9.18 to the May 1996 S-8.
10.76 Class A Option Agreement, dated as of March 26, 1996, between the
Registrant and John Coppolino. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 9.19 to the May 1996 S-8.
10.77 Class B Option Agreement, dated as of March 26, 1996, between the
Registrant and John Coppolino. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 9.20 to the May 1996 S-8.
10.78 Employment Agreement, between the Registrant and John Coppolino.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.78 to the 1996 Form 10-KSB.
10.79 Foreclosure Purchase Agreement related to the Acquisition of assets
of Auburn Farms, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to
the Registrant's Form 8-K, dated May 2, 1996.
10.80 Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 15, 1996, between the
Registrant and Coast Business Credit, a division of Southern
Pacific Thrift & Loan Association. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K, dated August 15, 1996.
10.81 Agreement, dated as of July 10, 1996, between the Registrant and
Second Nature Technologies, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.81 to the 1996 Form 10-KSB.
10.82 Employment Agreement dated June 16, 1997 between Jack Spencer and
the Registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the
Registrant's Form SB-2 filed July 23,1997
10.83 Agreement, dated April 1997, between the Registrant and ATCOLP
Investment Partners, a California Limited Partnership. Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant's Form SB-2 filed July 23, 1997
10.84 Employment Agreement dated September 1997 between the Registrant and
Mark Beychok. (x)
10.85 Employment Agreement dated September 1997 between the Registrant and
John Coppolino.(x)
10.86 Subscription Agreement with Global International Sourcing, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (xii)
22. Subsidiaries of the Registrant: Global International Sourcing, Inc.
(xii)
23.1 Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP (filed herewith)
27. Financial Data Schedule (filed herewith)
(i) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-18, file number 33-31883.
(ii) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Registrant's
December 31, 1990 and 1989 Form 10-K's.
30
<PAGE>
(iii) Incorporated by reference to exhibits 1 & 2 to the Registrant's September
30, 1993 Form 10-QSB.
(iv) Incorporated by reference to exhibits 1 through 4 to the Registrant's
August 7, 1993 Form 8-K.
(v) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's December 31, 1993 Form 10-KSB.
(vi) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's December 31, 1994 Form 10-KSB.
(vii) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's December 31, 1995 Form 10-KSB.
(viii) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's December 31, 1996 Form 10-KSB.
(ix) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's December 31, 1997 Form 10-KSB.
(x) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's January 14, 1998 Form SB-2/A.
(xi) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's June 24, 1998 Form SB-2/A.
(xii) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's August 14, 1998 Form SB-2/A.
(xiii) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the
Registrant's November 12, 1998 Form SB-2/A.
(b) Reports of Form 8-k.
There were no reports filed on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter ended
December 31, 1998.
31
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereby, duly authorized.
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
By: /s/ Mark Beychok
------------------------
Mark Beychok, President
LOS ANGELES, California
Date: May 24, 1999
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been duly
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Title(s) Date
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Mark Beychok Director, President, and May 24, 1999
- ------------------------ Chief Executive Officer
Mark Beychok (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Fred Rigaud Acting Chief Financial Officer May 24, 1999
- ------------------------ (Principal Accounting Officer)
Fred Rigaud
/s/ John Coppolino Director and May 24, 1999
- ------------------------ Executive Vice President
John Coppolino
/s/ Paul G. Cowen
- ------------------------
Paul G. Cowen Director May 24, 1999
/s/ Benjamin Tabatchnick Director May 24, 1999
- -----------------------------
Benjamin Tabatchnick
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS F-2
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997 F-3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997 F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) -
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997 F-6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS -
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997 F-7
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES F-9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS F-13
F-1
<PAGE>
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
Board of Directors and Stockholders
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Los Angeles, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vitafort
International Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Vitafort
International Corporation and Subsidiaries at December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the two years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations,
including a loss from operations of $3,970,712 for the year ended December 31,
1998. The Company also has a negative working capital of $615,028 and a
stockholders' deficit of $1,704,265 as of December 31, 1998. These and other
factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in
Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Los Angeles, California
APRIL 15, 1999 /S/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
F-2
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
------------ --------------
ASSETS (NOTE 6)
<S> <C> <C>
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 903,649 $2,199,036
Marketable securities (Note 17) 250,000 -
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $41,775 and $25,743 as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively 929,006 412,289
Inventory (Notes 3 and 6) 196,603 247,611
Notes receivable related party (Note 15) - 10,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 132,509 269,268
---------- ----------
Total current assets 2,411,767 3,138,204
---------- ----------
Equipment (Note 7):
Manufacturing equipment 19,881 290,912
Furniture and office equipment 105,160 105,160
Computer equipment 209,574 193,571
---------- ----------
334,615 589,643
Less accumulated depreciation (271,411) (347,493)
---------- ----------
Net equipment 63,204 242,150
---------- ----------
Other Assets:
Advances to Global International Sourcing (Note 8) - 193,818
Intangible assets, net
(Note 4) 911,684 338,091
Other assets 875 -
---------- ----------
Total other assets 912,559 531,909
---------- ----------
$3,387,530 $3,912,263
========== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to consolidated
financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
December 31, December 31,
1998 1997
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Current liabilities:
Note payable - bank (Note 6) $ 283,689 $ 60,757
Notes payable - other (Note 6) 958,724 283,898
Convertible notes payable (Note 6) 600,000 -
Accounts payable 1,054,079 909,315
Accrued expenses (Note 5) 130,303 342,437
Current maturities of long-term debt - 37,859
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 3,026,795 1,634,266
------------ ------------
Long-term debt due to Stockholder (Note 7) 2,065,000 -
------------
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 11 and 13)
Stockholders' equity (deficit) (Notes 10, 11 and 16):
Series A, 6% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value; 750 shares authorized;
0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
1998 and 750 at December 31, 1997; aggregate
liquidation preference of $750,000 at December 31, 1997 - 8
Series B, 10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock,
$.01 par value; authorized 110,000 shares; issued
and outstanding 1,000 shares; aggregate liquidation
preference of $50,000 10 10
Series C, Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; authorized 450 shares;
issued and outstanding 50 shares;
aggregate liquidation preference of $50,000 1 1
Common stock, $.0001 par value, authorized 30,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 12,056,428 and 6,683,853 shares 1,206 668
Additional paid-in capital 24,064,868 23,160,507
Accumulated deficit (25,770,350) (20,883,197)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (1,704,265) 2,277,997
------------ ------------
$ 3,387,530 $ 3,912,263
============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to consolidated
financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
NET SALES $ 2,861,392 $ 1,995,317
COST OF SALES 1,876,319 1,896,410
----------- -----------
GROSS PROFIT 985,073 98,907
----------- -----------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and development 362,770 337,806
Sales and marketing 2,035,125 1,239,460
General and administrative 2,557,890 2,672,946
----------- -----------
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 4,955,785 4,250,212
----------- -----------
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS (3,970,712) (4,151,305)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest income 39,591 78,070
Interest expense (221,547) (214,690)
Other income (expense) (59,684) 15,210
Loss on disposal of assets (42,246) -
Litigation recovery , net of costs (Note 18) - 4,748,946
----------- -----------
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) (283,886) 4,627,536
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES (4,254,598) 476,231
STATE INCOME TAXES (NOTE 8) 3,407 3,200
----------- -----------
NET (LOSS) INCOME (4,258,005) 473,031
Deemed dividends to preferred shareholders (629,148) (305,749)
----------- -----------
Net (loss) income allocable to common shareholders $(4,887,153) $ 167,282
=========== ===========
Basic net (loss) income per common share $ (0.66) $ 0.03
=========== ===========
Diluted net (loss) income per common share $ (0.66) $ 0.03
=========== ===========
Basic weighted average shares of common stock 7,348,093 5,831,404
=========== ===========
Diluted weighted average shares of common stock 7,348,093 6,343,397
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to consolidated
financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years Ended Dcember 31, 1998 and 1997
<TABLE>
Series A Series B
Cumulative Cumulative Series C
Convertible Convertible Convertible
Preferred Stock Preferred Stock Preferred Stock Common Stock
------------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
-------- -------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January 1, 1997 - $ - 1,000 $ 10 50 $ 1 4,908,664 $ 491
Common stock issued in private placement 500,000 50
Common stock issued as settlement of disputes 70,000 7
Series A Preferred issued in private placement 750 8
Payment of accounts payable obligations with stock 662,589 66
Exercise of warrants 200,000 20
Exercise of stock options 342,600 34
Preferred stock dividends
Net income
----- ------- ----- ---- ---- ------ ---------- ------
Balance, December 31, 1997 750 8 1,000 10 50 1 6,683,853 668
Series A Preferred issued in connection with
a private placement, net of expenses 500 5
Stock issued as settlement of contract disputes 115,000 12
Exercise of stock options 239,500 24
Stock issued for acquisition of marketing contract 60,000 6
Stock issued for services 436,500 44
Issuance of common stock 1,000,000 100
Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock (350) (4) 3,521,575 352
Redemption of Series A Preferred Stock (1,351) (13)
Issuance of warrants
Preferred stock dividends 451 4
Net Loss
----- ------- ----- ---- ---- ------ ---------- ------
Balance, December 31, 1998 0 $ - 1,000 $ 10 50 $ 1 12,056,428 $1,206
===== ======= ===== ==== ==== ====== ========== ======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additional
Paid-In Accumulated
Capital Deficit Total
----------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January 1, 1997 $20,556,148 $(21,050,479) $ (493,829)
Common stock issued in private placement 449,950 450,000
Common stock issued as settlement of disputes 78,743 78,750
Series A Preferred issued in private placement 672,992 673,000
Payment of accounts payable obligations with stock 638,297 638,363
Exercise of warrants 139,980 140,000
Exercise of stock options 318,648 318,682
Preferred stock dividends 305,749 (305,749) -
Net income 473,031 473,031
----------- ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 1997 23,160,507 (20,883,197) 2,277,997
Series A Preferred issued in connection with
a private placement, net of expenses 498,995 499,000
Stock issued as settlement of contract disputes 94,176 94,188
Exercise of stock options 213,634 213,658
Stock issued for acquisition of marketing contract 43,118 43,124
Stock issued for services 402,149 402,193
Issuance of common stock 249,900 250,000
Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock (348) -
Redemption of Series A Preferred Stock (1,505,007) (1,505,020)
Issuance of warrants 278,600 278,600
Preferred stock dividends 629,144 (629,148) -
Net Loss (4,258,005) (4,258,005)
----------- ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 1998 $24,064,868 $(25,770,350) $(1,704,265)
=========== ============ ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 1998 1997
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income $ (4,258,005) $ 473,031
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 237,410 163,503
Allowance for doubtful accounts 16,032 (54,251)
Write-off of related party receivables 104,290 -
Loss on disposal of assets 42,559 -
Warrants issued for services (Note 10) - 138,000
Stock issued for services (Note 16) 261,706 -
Other (37,859) -
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable (210,204) (127,249)
Inventories 56,008 113,585
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 152,618 2,463
Notes receivable - 46,000
Other receivables - 4,464
Other assets (875) -
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 66,358 1,031,347
------------ ----------
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities (3,569,962) 1,790,893
------------ ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from disposal of equipment 73,516 -
Purchase of equipment (35,884) (20,277)
Advances to Global International Sourcing (285,386) (193,818)
Customer acquisition costs (109,872) -
Cash acquired through acquisition of Global International Sourcing 75,462 -
------------ ----------
Cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities (282,164) (214,095)
------------ ----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from convertible notes payable 600,000 -
Proceeds of notes payable, other 1,047,262 307,871
Repayment of notes payable, other (372,435) (625,695)
Proceeds from issuance of stock 499,000 1,123,000
Exercise of stock options and warrants - 7,460
Redemption of Preferred Series A Stock (1,505,020) -
Proceeds from long-term debt 2,065,000 -
Proceeds from notes payable - bank 2,025,818 838,426
Repayments of notes payable - bank (1,802,886) (1,217,691)
------------ ----------
Cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities 2,556,739 433,371
------------ ----------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (1,295,387) 2,010,169
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 2,199,036 188,867
------------ ----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 903,649 $2,199,036
============ ==========
</TABLE>
F-7
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
---- ----
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
<S> <C> <C>
Interest $ 175,079 $ 215,126
Income taxes 3,407 3,200
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash operating, investing and
financing activities:
Conversion of accounts payable to equity $ - $1,030,335
Conversion of accounts payable to notes payable - 601,723
Stock issued for accounts and notes payable 132,988 -
Stock issued for prepaid consulting services 7,500 -
Stock issued upon cashless exercise of options 213,658 -
Stock issued as settment of contract dispute 94,188 -
Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock of common stock
(350 shares of preferred stock for 3,521,575 shares of
common stock - -
Stock issued in exchange for marketable securities
(1,000,000 shares of common stock issued) 250,000 -
Stock issued for acquisition of marketing contract 43,124
Acquisition of Global International Sourcing:
Assets acquired, net of cash 535,786 -
Liabilities assumed, including $522,328 due to Vitafort 829,461 -
</TABLE>
See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to
financial statements.
F-8
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Vitafort
International Corporation (the "Company") include the accounts of the Company
and its subsidiaries: Hollywood Partners, Inc. (formerly Vitafort Distributors,
Inc.); Global International Sourcing, Inc. (Global); Nutrifish Corporation
(90.5% owned) and Crystal Clear Farms. Nutrifish Corporation and Crystal Clear
Farms are inactive subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
RECLASSIFICATION AND PRESENTATION
Certain 1997 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 1998
presentation.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents are investments with original maturities of three
months or less and short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily
convertible to known amounts of cash and are so near their maturity that they
present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest
rates.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The Company has classified its entire investment portfolio as
available-for-sale in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115,
"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities".
Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and
losses included in shareholders' equity. The amortized cost of debt securities
is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity.
Such amortization is included in interest income. Realized gains and losses are
included in other income (expense). The cost of securities sold is based on the
specific identification method.
INVENTORY
Inventory consists of merchandise available for sale, packaging supplies
and raw materials, and are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or
market.
EQUIPMENT
Equipment is comprised of manufacturing equipment, furniture, office
equipment and computer equipment and is recorded at cost. Depreciation is
computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life not in excess
of five years.
F-9
<PAGE>
ADVERTISING
General costs are expenses as incurred or prepaid until the advertisement
is published, at which time the related costs are expensed.
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets are composed of acquisition costs of Auburn Farms and
Natures Warehouse trademarks, debt issuance costs and customer acquisition costs
and are recorded at cost. The acquisition costs associated with trademarks are
being amortized on a straight-line basis over twenty years. All other
intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods not
exceeding five years.
These costs are reviewed by management periodically and written down to the
value of the future benefit expected to be derived.
REVENUE
Product sales and related costs are recognized when the Company's products
are shipped from the commercial warehouse used by the Company or the contract
manufacturer to the customer.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of"
("SFAS No. 121") establishes guidelines regarding when impairment losses on
long-lived assets, which include plant and equipment and certain identifiable
intangible assets, should be recognized and how impairment losses should be
measured. The Company periodically reviews such assets for possible impairment
and expected losses, if any, are recorded currently.
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share"
("SFAS 128") issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") is
effective for financial statements with fiscal years and interim periods ending
after December 15, 1997. SFAS 128 provides for the calculation of Basic and
Diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and
is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings
per share reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the
earnings of an entity, such as stock options, warrants or convertible
debentures. The Company adopted SFAS 128 on December 15, 1997 and it had no
effect on income (loss) per share.
F-10
<PAGE>
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided when management
cannot determine whether or not it is more likely that the net deferred tax
asset will be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in the rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company has cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable
for which the carrying value approximates the fair value due to the short-term
nature of these instruments.
The fair value of long-term debt due to shareholder cannot be estimated due
to its related party nature.
The fair value of the Company's debt instruments is based on the quoted
market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to
the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities.
STOCK COMPENSATION
As of January 1, 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS
123"). SFAS 123 allows an entity to elect to continue to measure compensation
cost under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25"), but requires pro forma disclosures of net
earnings and earnings per share as if the fair-valued-based method of accounting
had been applied. In accordance with FASB 123, the Company elected to continue
to measure compensation cost under APB No. 25, and comply with the pro forma
disclosure requirements.
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ABOUT CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 129, "Disclosure of
Information about Capital Structure," ("SFAS 129") issued by the FASB is
effective for financial statements with fiscal years ending after December 15,
1997. The new standard reinstates various securities disclosure requirements
previously in effect under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15, which has
been superceded by SFAS No. 128. The Company adopted SFAS No. 129 on December
15, 1997 and it did not have any effect on its financial position or results of
operations.
REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 130, "Reporting
Comprehensive Income," ("SFAS 130") issued by the FASB is effective for
financial statements with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997.
Earlier application is permitted. SFAS 130 establishes standards for reporting
and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-
purpose financial statements. The Company adopted SFAS 130 and it did not have
any effect on its financial position or results of operations.
F-11
<PAGE>
DISCLOSURES ABOUT SEGMENTS OF AN ENTERPRISE AND RELATED INFORMATION
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" ("SFAS 131") issued by the
FASB is effective for financial statements with fiscal years ending after
December 15, 1997. SFAS 131 requires that public companies report certain
information about operating segments, products, services and geographical areas
in which they operate and their major customers. The Company adopted SFAS 131 on
January 1, 1998, and it did not have any effect on its financial position or
results of operations as the Company operates in one business segment. The
company is providing the other footnote disclosures required by SFAS 131.
F-12
<PAGE>
VITAFORT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY
Vitafort International Corporation (the "Company") was incorporated on
September 28, 1989 in the State of Delaware to succeed to the business of a
California corporation of the same name which was organized on February 7, 1986.
The Company is presently engaged in sourcing, developing, and formulating
products that it sells and markets under brands for healthy products, for
licensed products and for low priced sourced products.
NOTE 2 - LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN
For the past several years, the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations, including $3,970,712 for the year ended December 31, 1998 and has a
negative working capital of $615,028 and a stockholder's deficit of $1,704,265
at December 31, 1998. The Company's long-term credit facility expires April 30,
1999. Furthermore, the company has been delinquent or slow in payments to
noteholders and suppliers. Although the Company raised additional capital in
1998 (see Note 10), it has not generated sufficient revenue-producing activity
to sustain its operations. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt regarding the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is attempting to
raise additional capital to meet future financial obligations, but may not be
able to do so. Should the Company not be able to raise additional capital, it
may have to severely curtail operations. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that may be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a
going concern.
The Company has reduced its cost of sales by sourcing a significant amount
of its products from Mexico at lower rates than with existing manufacturers. The
Company has also introduced both new and reformulated products in 1998 and plans
to introduce new products in 1999. These steps, coupled with improvements in
subcontract manufacturing quality control and quality assurance, monitoring
improvements in Company internal control and communications with respect to
product returns and deductions, should improve the Company's prospects to
achieve profitability.
NOTE 3 - INVENTORY
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first in, first out) or market.
Inventory consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1998 1997
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Finished goods $118,524 $ 30,188
Packaging and raw material 78,079 217,423
-------- --------
$196,603 $247,611
======== ========
</TABLE>
F-13
<PAGE>
NOTE 4 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Intangible assets, net, consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1998 1997
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Auburn Farms trademarks $311,254 $311,254
Customer acquisition costs 76,167 -
Deferred financing costs 278,600 100,000
Distribution rights 93,686 -
Goodwill 218,213 -
-------- --------
977,920 411,254
Less accumulated
amortization 66,236 73,163
-------- --------
Total intangible assets $911,684 $338,091
======== ========
</TABLE>
NOTE 5 - ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1998 1997
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Accrued compensation $ 32,709 $156,764
Accrued interest payable 46,468 -
Accrued legal fees - 40,112
Accrued consulting fees - 4,919
Accrued royalties 51,126 -
Other accrued expenses - 140,642
-------- --------
Total accrued expenses $130,303 $342,437
======== ========
</TABLE>
NOTE 6 - NOTES PAYABLE
Bank
----
In August 1996, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility with
Coast Business Credit ("Bank") that provided a credit line of up to $4,000,000
subject to certain covenants. Advances made to the Company under the facility
were based on a certain percentage of eligible accounts receivable, as defined,
and a certain percentage of eligible inventory, as defined. The amount of
inventory advances under the facility cannot exceed $500,000. Advances under the
facility bear interest at the Bank of America NT prime (7.75% at December 31,
1998) plus 3%, and are secured by a first priority lien on all of the Company's
assets. Minimum interest charges were $15,000 per month through August, 1998.
On June 26, 1998, the Bank notified the Company that the credit line was
expiring on August 31, 1998. As of December 31, 1998, the Company was in
violation of the tangible net worth covenant in that it had fallen below the
$1,500,000 requirement and the working capital covenant in that it had fallen
below the $1,000,000 requirement. In addition, the facility which expired on
August 31, 1998 has not been renewed, although the lender has extended the term
until April 30, 1999. As of December 31, 1998, the amount due under this credit
facility was $283,690. The Bank agreed to eliminate from its collateral the
inventory to be used for the Purchase Order Financing discussed below. The
Company is in negotiations with the Bank and other potential lenders to receive
more favorable terms than under the
F-14
<PAGE>
previous agreement. Should the Company be unable to secure a replacement lender,
it could severely jeopardize the future ability of the Company to fund
operations.
Other
-----
In June 1998 and throughout the rest of the year, the Company entered into
purchase order financing agreements with accredited investors which provided the
Company with $995,000 to purchase inventory. These advances bear interest at 3%
per month and are due as the related receivables are financed through the
company's credit facility. In addition, several lenders received options to
purchase 410,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $1.00 per share, which
was fair market value at the time. The exercise price was later reduced to $0.10
and $0.085 reflecting a subsequent decline in the fair market value of the
Company's common stock. The Company has pledged its inventory as collateral for
these advances. At December 31, 1998, $795,000 of these advances were
outstanding. The Company has been notified that one lender of approximately
$250,000 of debt may file suit. The Company disputes the interest claimed in
relation to that $250,000 debt.
Notes payable other, at December 31, 1997 represents the current balance of
the original conversion of $601,723 of trade accounts payable. These notes are
unsecured and payable in various monthly installments (including interest at
various rates). The notes have various maturity dates through December 1998. At
December 31, 1998, $111,462 was still outstanding under these notes. The Company
is delinquent on payment of these notes.
Also included in notes payable at December 31, 1998 is an insurance
contract payable for $52,262.
Convertible Notes Payable
-------------------------
The convertible notes payable consists of two notes in the amount of
$300,000 each to previous holders of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock.
The notes are due October 20, 1999 and bear interest at 8%. The Company may
repay these notes and accrued interest through the issuance of common stock,
based upon the market price of the shares at that time.
Under the terms of these notes, the Company issued five-year warrants to
the holders of these notes to purchase 60,000 shares of common stock at $0.40
per share and 60,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share. If the notes
and accrued interest are repaid in cash, the warrants for 60,000 shares at $0.25
will be cancelled. Otherwise, to the extent any portion of the notes and
accrued interest is paid with stock, the exercise price of a proportionate
number of the 60,000 shares will be adjusted to $0.01 per share. The warrants
were valued at the fair value as of the date issued, which resulted in non-cash
financing cost of $58,262. This non-cash financing cost is being amortized as
interest expense over the term of the debt.
On August 24, 1998, the Company issued a convertible debenture due August
24, 2000 and received proceeds in the amount of $548,352. Interest was payable
at 6% per annum. Repayments could be made in cash or stock at the option of the
Company. On December 30, 1998, this note and accrued interest of $11,629 were
repaid in full from the proceeds of a long-term promissory note (Note 7).
NOTE 7 - LONG-TERM DEBT
The Company's long term debt consists of a $2,065,000 five year promissory
note payable issued to a principal shareholder on December 30, 1998. The note is
due January 22, 2004 and bears interest at 6%. Interest is payable annually. The
note provides for the first year's interest on the note to be applied to the
partial exercise of the warrants. Under the terms of the note, the Company
issued warrants to the note holder to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock at
$0.25 per share. These warrants were valued at the fair value as at that date,
which resulted in non-cash financing cost of $220,267. This non-cash financing
cost is being amortized as interest expense over the term of the debt.
F-15
<PAGE>
The proceeds from this note were used to retire 1,351 shares of Series A
Preferred Stock and repay a $548,352 note payable to a shareholder
along with accrued interest thereon of $11,628. (Notes 7, 10 and 19).
NOTE 8 - ACQUISITION OF GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL SOURCING, INC.
As of March 31, 1998, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of
Global International Sourcing, Inc. (Global) for $25. The acquisition was
accounted for as a purchase and the operations of Global are included herein
commencing April 1, 1998. The assets and liabilities of Global were recorded at
fair value and resulted in goodwill of $218,213. Had the Company consolidated
its operating performance with Global for the entire year ended December 31,
1998, the unaudited proforma results would have been as follows:
Net Sales $ 3,322,369
Gross Profit 1,037,128
Net Loss (4,364,431)
Net Loss Allocable to Common Shareholders (4,993,579)
Net Loss Per Share (.67)
Global was formed in October 1997 and its financial position and results of
operations are not material compared to the Company's financial position at
December 31, 1997 or its results of operations for the year ended December 31,
1997.
NOTE 9 - INCOME TAXES
As the Company has incurred significant operating losses since inception,
its current tax provision has been limited to minimum California tax payments.
F-16
<PAGE>
As of December 31, 1998, the Company had unused Federal and California net
operating loss carryforwards of approximately $24,300,000 and $11,100,000,
respectively, available to offset against future Federal taxable income and
future California taxable income. The unused net operating loss and credit
carryforwards expire in various amounts through the year 2013. In contrast to
Federal net operating losses, only 50% of the California net operating losses
incurred subsequent to December 31, 1986 may be carried forward. The California
net operating losses will expire in various amounts through the year 2003.
Net deferred tax assets of approximately $8,600,000 resulting from net
operating losses have been offset by a valuation allowance since management
cannot determine whether it is more likely than not such assets will be
realized.
Due to restrictions imposed by the Internal Revenue Code regarding
substantial changes in ownership of companies with loss carryforwards, the
utilization of the above-mentioned net operating losses may be limited as a
result of changes in stock ownership. The annual utilization of these losses is
limited to an amount equal to the estimated fair value (for income tax purposes)
of the Company at the point of stock ownership change, multiplied by the long-
term tax-exempt rate then in effect. The annual limitation has not been
quantified at this time.
NOTE 10 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Convertible Preferred Stock
The Company entered into two subscription agreements totaling $750,000 in
1997 with two unrelated investors for 750 shares of 1997 Series A Preferred
Stock. The preferred stock has a cumulative dividend rate of 6% with no voting
rights. The conversion price is the lower of $1.25 per share or a 30% discount
to the market price at the time of conversion. The preferred stock is
convertible at any time. For accounting purposes, the original issue discount
of $305,749 is being treated as a deemed dividend. The facilitators received a
10% fee from the proceeds, as well as warrants to purchase 52,500 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. Cumulative unpaid
dividends amounted to $32,500 at December 31, 1998.
The Company entered into a subscription agreement in March 1998 with an
unrelated investor for $500,000 for 500 shares of 1997 Series A Preferred Stock.
The preferred stock has a cumulative dividend of 6% with no voting rights. The
preferred stock is convertible beginning August 10, 1998 at a 21.5% discount if
the fair market value of the stock on the date of conversion is $0.6875 per
share or less. If the fair market value of the stock on the date of conversion
is more than $0.6875 per share, the preferred stock is convertible at fair
market value. However, if the preferred shares are converted at fair market
value, the preferred shareholder will receive sufficient warrants upon
conversion to purchase common stock at $0.6875 per share to generate a $275
profit per share of preferred stock converted.
As part of the above transaction, the Company also issued 451 shares of
preferred stock, as well as warrants to purchase 282,422 shares of common stock
at $0.6875 per share to the holders of the 1997 Series A
F-17
<PAGE>
Preferred Stock in exchange for the preferred stockholders accepting an
adjustment in the terms of the 1997 Series A Preferred Stock. The warrants may
be exercised over a five year period beginning August 10, 1998.
For accounting purposes, the issuance of the warrants to the 1997 Series A
Preferred stockholders resulted in a deemed dividend of $147,381.
The modified terms of the 1,701 total shares of 1997 Series A Preferred
Stock outstanding resulted in an issuance of 787,563 warrants to purchase
shares of common stock. The value of these potential warrants issued is
reflected as an original issued discount of $411,128 at the time of the
transaction. This original issue discount is being treated as a deemed
dividend.
During the last quarter of 1998, the holders of 350 shares of the 1997
Series A Preferred Stock elected to convert said shares into 3,251,575 shares of
common stock under the terms of the subscription agreement.
The Company repurchased the remaining 1,351 shares of the 1997 Series A
Preferred Stock for $1,505,020 from the proceeds of a promissory note (Note 7).
Each share of Series B 10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred stock is
convertible into 1.667 shares of common stock, and cumulative convertible
dividends of 10% per annum are payable annually commencing October 1992. The
Series B 10% Cumulative Preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $50 per
share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. It is subject to optional
redemption by the Company at any time at $50 per share plus accrued and unpaid
dividends. Cumulative unpaid dividends amounted to $39,000 and $25,000 at
December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 100
shares of common stock and 100 warrants. Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
does not carry any dividend rights. The warrants expired in June 1994.
Additionally, the Series C Convertible Stock has a dilutive conversion factor.
The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000
per share after Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, and to holders
of common stock.
The shares of Series B and Series C Preferred stock are not currently
registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Common Stock
In January 1998, the Company issued 85,000 shares of common stock at a
value of $1.00 per share as settlement for contract disputes previously recorded
as a liability.
In February 1998, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock at a
value of $.30625 per share as settlement of a contract dispute related to
consulting services previously recorded as a liability.
In February 1998, the Company issued 60,000 shares of common stock at a
value of $.71875 per share and forgave a $25,000 note receivable from an
unrelated company in exchange for its distribution rights with respect to
marshmallow products in North America. The Company also received $5,000 of
sample inventory and $15,000 of furniture and equipment as part of this
transaction.
In February 1998, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock at a
value of $0.74 per share upon the exercise of an option granted a consultant in
exchange for future consulting services.
F-18
<PAGE>
In March 1998, the Company issued 15,000 shares of common stock at a value
of $1.00 per share upon the exercise of an option granted a consultant in
exchange for services rendered previously recorded as a liability.
In April and July 1998, the Company issued a total of 87,000 shares of
common stock at a value of $1.00 per share upon the exercise of options granted
to a consultant in exchange for consulting services.
In May 1998, the Company issued 37,500 shares of common stock at a value of
$1.004 per share upon the exercise of an option granted a previous employee as
part of a litigation settlement.
In June 1998, the Company issued 174,500 shares of common stock at a value
of $1.00 per share under an S-8 filing as payment for services rendered and to
be rendered.
In July 1998, the Company issued an additional 60,500 shares at values
averaging $.80 per share under the S-8 filing as payment for services rendered
and to be rendered.
During 1998, the Company issued 29,500 shares of common stock at a value of
$1.00 per share to various consultants and professional firms for previous
services rendered.
In July 1998, the Company issued 20,000 shares of common stock at a value
of $.94 per share to a consultant in payment of services rendered.
In August 1998, the Company issued 125,000 shares of common stock to
officers at a value of $1.00 per share in payment of accrued bonuses.
In August 1998, the Company issued 7,000 shares of common stock at a value
of $.86 per share to a consultant in payment of services rendered.
In December 1998, the Company issued 352,575 shares of common stock upon
the conversion of 350 shares of 1997 Series A Preferred Stock.
In December 1998, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock to
Terra Healthy Living, a principal shareholder, for $250,000 (or $.25 per share)
which was paid by delivery to the Company of marketable Swiss securities. The
Company believes that the price paid for such shares was no less favorable to
the Company than that which would have been paid by an unaffiliated purchaser.
The Company entered into a subscription agreement in February 1997 with an
investor who purchased 500,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share. At
funding, a 10% fee was paid to a facilitator and warrants were given to that
same facilitator to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.375
per share which was later reduced to $1.00.
The Company issued 70,000 shares at a value of $1.125 per share as
settlement for a contract dispute.
The Company issued 126,000 shares of common stock in March 1997 and 350,589
shares of common stock in August 1997 under an S-8 filing as payment for
services rendered by various consultants and employees. The shares of common
stock were valued at the amount received by the consultants and employees upon
sale of these shares. As a result, the Company reduced the amount owed to these
consultants and employees by $461,782.
In August 1997, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock at $.93
per share to a professional firm for previous services rendered.
F-19
<PAGE>
The Company issued 61,000 shares of common stock at $.96 per share in
September 1997 under an S-8 filing and 25,000 shares of restricted common stock
at $1.00 per share in November 1997 as payment for $83,581 of services rendered
by various employees and consultants.
The Company issued 20,000 shares at a value of $1.125 per share and 10,000
shares at a value of $1.06 per share upon the exercise of options granted to a
former employee as compensation for consulting services and past unpaid accrued
vacation.
The Company issued 176,600 shares at $.875 per share and 6,000 shares at
$.91 per share upon the exercise of options granted under the Non-Incentive
Stock Option Plan. Non-officers of the Company paid the exercise price of such
options through the application of accrued payroll and other various expenses.
During 1997, a consultant exercised options for 60,000 shares of common
stock at $.93 per share and 40,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share as
payment for services rendered. No cash was received by the Company.
In July 1997, another consultant exercised options for 30,000 shares of
common stock at $1.00 per share as payment for services rendered. No cash was
received by the Company.
NOTE 11 - STOCK OPTIONS
The 1989 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan") reserved 50,000 shares
of common stock (as adjusted for the reverse split effected in 1996) to grant
either nonqualified or incentive stock options. All directors, officers, key
employees and consultants to the Company or its subsidiaries are eligible under
the terms of the Plan. Such options may not be granted at less than 100% of the
fair market value at the date of grant (110% for an owner of 10% or more of the
outstanding stock). Upon termination of service, the options, which an
individual was entitled to exercise at the date of termination may be exercised
at any time within six months of such termination. If an employee is terminated
with cause, the options are canceled upon termination. As of December 31, 1998,
no options are outstanding under this plan.
In 1995, the Company adopted the 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "1995 Plan")
pursuant to which 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock (as adjusted for the reverse
stock split effected in 1996) were reserved for
F-20
<PAGE>
issuance upon the exercise of options. The 1995 Plan is similar to the 1989 Plan
in many respects and in the discussion below, each is referred to as a "Plan"
and they are collectively referred to as the "Plans".
The Company has also granted stock options outside the Plans to other
individuals, such as employees and consultants, in consideration for services
performed. The options were granted at fair market value and at various terms
and vesting periods. The following table on the next page summarizes all option
activity for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Common Stock Options Weighted
1995 Stock Other Stock Average
Option Plan Options Price
--------------- -------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding as of
January 1, 1997 1,545,000 711,232 $3.54
Granted 185,600 3,343,500 0.93
Exercised (182,600) (160,000) 1.24
Canceled (316,292) (8,750) 2.02
--------- ---------- -----
Outstanding as of
December 31, 1997 1,231,708 3,885,982 $1.55
Granted and repriced - 6,775,528 .41
Exercised - (239,500) .89
Canceled - (2,328,970) 2.01
--------- ---------- -----
Outstanding as of
December 31, 1998 1,231,708 8,073,040 $ .66
========= ========== =====
Exerciseable as of
December 31, 1998 1,231,708 6,839,320 $ .60
========= ========== =====
</TABLE>
FASB Statement 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," requires the
Company to provide pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per
share as if compensation cost for the Company's stock option plans had been
determined in accordance with the fair value based method prescribed in FASB
Statement 123. The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option, using
the Black-Scholes method, at the weighted-average assumption used for grants in
fiscal 1998 and 1997 dividend yield of zero percent; expected volatility of 28
percent and 36 percent; risk-free interest rate of eight percent; and expected
lives of 5.0 and 5.0 years, respectively.
The weighted average fair value of options granted during 1998 and 1997 was
$.41 and $.39, respectively.
Under the accounting provisions of FASB Statement 123, the Company's net
income (loss) and income (loss) per share for 1998 and 1997 would have been
reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
F-21
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net Income (Loss) 1998 1997
------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
As reported $(4,887,153) $ 167,282
Pro forma $(4,904,346) ($68,466)
Basic income (loss) per share
-----------------------------
As reported $ (.66) ($ 0.03)
Pro forma $ (.66) ($ 0.01)
Diluted income (loss) per share
-------------------------------
As reported $ (.66) ($ 0.03)
Pro forma $ (.66) ($ 0.01)
</TABLE>
Due to the fact that the Company's stock option programs vest over many
years and additionally awards may be made each year, the above pro forma numbers
are not indicative of the financial impact had the disclosure provisions of FASB
123 been applicable to all years of previous grants. The numbers above do not
include the effect of options granted prior to 1995 that vested in 1996 and
1997.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
at December 31, 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Options Exercisable
Outstanding ----------------------------
Number Weighted-Average Number Weighted
Range of Outstanding Remaining Weighted-Average Exercisable Average
Exercisable Prices At 12/31/98 Contractual Life Exercise Price at 12/31/98 Exercise Price
- ------------------ ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0.875 - $.75 4,932,250 1.8 $ 0.11 4,518,750 $ 0.11
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 0.875 - $2.80 4,044,373 2.1 1.05 3,324,153 1.05
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$3.00 - $7.50 295,375 1.9 2.76 195,375 2.50
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$10.00 - $20.00 32,750 8.93 12.14 32,750 12.14
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals 9,304,748 2.0 $ 0.66 8,071,028 $ 0.60
- ----------------=======================================================================================
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
NOTE 12 - COMMITMENTS
Lease Agreement
The Company was obligated under a lease agreement for its executive offices
through August 1997. From September 1997 forward, the Company is renting the
offices on a month-to-month basis at a rate of $7,250 per month.
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 including
parking, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, was
$138,627 and $98,538, respectively.
F-22
<PAGE>
Employment Agreements
On December 1, 1993, the Company entered into a three-year employment
agreement with Mark Beychok which provided for an annual base salary of
$150,000, the grant of an option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at
$5.00 per share (as adjusted for the reverse stock split effected in 1996), and
$1,000,000 of life insurance, the proceeds of which will be split equally
between the employee's beneficiary and the Company. In December 1995, in
recognition of Mr. Beychok's deferral of his compensation during 1995 and his
assuming additional responsibilities within the Company, Mr. Beychok's
employment agreement was amended to grant him an additional 62,500 five-year
options with an exercise price of $3.00 (as adjusted for the reverse stock split
effected in 1996), a price equal to the offering price in the Company's then on-
going private placement. In November 1995, Mr. Beychok agreed to convert his
accrued salary to stock and options on the same terms as the Company's on-going
equity bridge financing. The Company's Board of Directors approved this
transaction in December 1995. In such connection, Mr. Beychok converted $45,821
of accrued salary into 19,092 shares; 9,547 options with an exercise price of
$4.50; and 9,547 options with an exercise price of $6.00. In September 1997,
Mr. Beychok entered into a new employment agreement ("Agreement") with the
Company for three years. Under the Agreement, Mr. Beychok receives an annual
base salary of $150,000 and was granted options for 450,000 shares of stock at
an exercise price of $0.87 per share. Such options vest 75,000 each on
September 3, 1997, March 3, 1998, September 3, 1998, March 3, 1999, September 3,
1999, and March 3, 2000. In May 1997 the price of all options other than those
related to the private placement were repriced to $0.91. In September 1997 Mr.
Beychok was given a successful litigation reward of $51,535 plus 100,000 shares
of common stock at fair market value of $1.00.
In August 1996, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John
Coppolino, which was dated January 1, 1996. Under his agreement, which is for a
one year term, with two one year renewal terms at the option of the Company, Mr.
Coppolino received an initial salary of $102,000; and, is entitled to annual
increases of 5-6% based on increases in the cost of living. Mr. Coppolino's
employment agreement provided for the grant of 225,000 options, expiring
December 31, 2000 for the purchase of common stock at $3.00 (as adjusted for the
reverse stock split effected in October 1996). Of these options: (i) 56,250
have vested (ii) 56,250 have lapsed and (iii) 56,250 will vest on each of
January 1, 1998 and January 1, 1999, subject to the Company meeting certain
performance criteria. In May 1997 the Board of Directors reduced the option
price of all unlapsed options to $0.91 and removed the vesting requirement. In
September 1997, Mr. Coppolino entered into a new employment agreement
("Agreement") with the Company for two years. Under the Agreement, Mr.
Coppolino receives an annual base salary of $120,000, and was granted options
for 300,000 shares of stock at an exercise price of $0.87 per share. Such
options vest 75,000 each on September 3, 1997, March 3, 1998, September 3, 1998,
and March 3, 1999. In September 1997, Mr. Coppolino was given a successful
litigation reward of $25,000, forgiveness of debt of $25,000, plus 25,000 shares
of common stock at $1.00, being the fair market value at the date of the award.
Auburn Farms Trademark Acquisition
The Company entered into a purchase agreement in 1996 whereby it acquired
the Auburn Farms trademark and other related trademarks. Deferred payments,
which will be accounted for as royalties under the agreement, amount to 3-1/2%
of gross sales of products sold using these trademarks during the 30 months
beginning May 1, 1996, with gradually reducing percentages over the next
successive three thirty-month periods. Deferred payments under the agreement
made in 1996 were $45,612 and in 1997 were $18,801 and were expensed as
royalties during the year.
In 1996, Auburn Farms entered Chapter 7 bankruptcy. In connection with the
Auburn Farms bankruptcy, the Company entered into an agreement with Sacramento
Bank, the priority secured creditor in the Auburn Farms bankruptcy, by which the
Company assumed the bank's position as the priority secured creditor in the
bankruptcy. Under independent counsel's advice, the Company believes, as a
consequence of the agreement with the bank, that it is no longer liable for
royalty payments subsequent to 1997.
F-23
<PAGE>
NOTE 13 - MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company derived the following revenue from major customers, each of
which provided 10% or more of total revenues during the year ended December 31,
1998 and 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Wal-Mart $ 585,813 $ -
A-1 International, Inc. 532,422 320,235
---------- --------
Total $1,118,235 $320,235
========== ========
</TABLE>
NOTE 14 - LITIGATION
The Company is subject to pending claims and litigation, the most
significant of which are discussed below.
In December 1994, Lloyd Gauntt, who invested an aggregate of $75,000 in
certain of the Company's private placements, initiated an action in Superior
Court, Orange County, California against his stockbroker, two national brokerage
firms, several companies in which he had invested; and, certain of those
company's officers. Included among the defendants was the Company and its then
Chief Executive Officer, Steve Westlund. The complaint seeks damages in an
unspecified amount in excess of $500,000 and punitive damages in an unspecified
amount in excess of $5,000,000. The Court has dismissed the class action claims
as to the Company and granted a motion that the claims against the brokerage
firms and associated persons must be submitted to arbitration. The Plaintiff
has appealed that ruling. The Company denies any liability to the plaintiff and
intends to vigorously defend this action. The Company notes that the plaintiff
sold a portion of the securities he purchased from the Company, realizing a
profit; that the balance of the securities became salable under Rule 144; and
that, if sold, the Plaintiff `s losses might be as little as $15,000.
In April, 1997, the Company agreed in principle with ATCOLP INVESTMENT
PARTNERS, a California Limited Partnership (the "Lender), in which Donald Wohl,
a Director of the Company at the time, is the general partner, for a loan in the
amount of $300,000 (the "Loan"), to fund the payment of legal fees in connection
with the Company's arbitration against The Keebler Company. The loan was
evidenced by a note which bears interest at the lesser of 15% per annum or the
highest rate allowed by law with recourse solely to the net proceeds of the
arbitration, if any. If the Company did not realize any net proceeds from the
arbitration, the Loan would be canceled and the Lender would receive a warrant
for the purchase of 400,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at $.01 per
share. If the Loan was repaid through the application of the net proceeds of the
arbitration, the Lender would receive warrants for the purchase of 200,000
shares of Common Stock at $.01 per share and a percentage of net proceeds of the
arbitration equal to 15% of the first $1,000,000 of net proceeds, but not less
than $100,000; 20% of the net proceeds greater than $1,000,000 and less than
$3,000,000; and, 25% of net proceeds above $3,000,000. The Loan was approved by
the disinterested members of the Company's Board of Directors, and was on terms
no less favorable to the Company than were available from non-affiliated
lenders. A second proposal, from another source, contained terms which would
have required the Company to pay $2,050,000 in fees based on the actual award,
repay the $300,000 advance, and be granted a warrant for 1,000,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at an exercise price of $1.00. The loan amount of
$300,000 was repaid upon settlement of the litigation in June 1997 and receipt
of funds in July 1997, plus $1,236,883 in conformity with the agreed upon
formula, plus a warrant for 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a
$0.01 per share. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the
recording of the entire transaction.
In connection with the acquisition of assets of Auburn Farms, Inc., ("AFI")
in 1996, the Company acquired the intellectual property and certain claims of
AFI. In May 1996, the Company filed an action in federal court alleging Lanham
Act violations, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition,
conspiracy and related claims arising out of New Life and Barbara's
misappropriation of Auburn Farms' principal products by AFI's co-packer, New
Life Bakery ("New Life"), and a principal competitor, Barbara's Bakery
("Barbara's"). The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of California which is scheduled for trial in May 2000.
Vitafort is seeking in excess of $10 million in damages based on claims of
unfair competition, breach of contract, fraud among other claims. These claims
arise from New Life's abrupt termination of production for Auburn Farms and its
alleged conspiracy with Barbara's Bakery to make and distribute to natural food
stores and other retailers products to which Auburn Farms (and Vitafort as
successor) had contractual rights to distribute exclusively. It is also based on
Barbara's Bakery's representations to brokers, distributors and consumers that
it had the right to distribute these same food products. The Company has been
advised by outside litigation counsel that evidence produced in discovery may
support a request for punitive damages. The defendants have filed counterclaims
against Vitafort and its Chief Executive Officer seeking $5 million in damages.
On March 25, 1998, New Life and Barbara's purported to purchase from AFI's
bankruptcy estate certain claims against Barbara's and New Life for $300,000.
The purchased claims do not include any of the claims previously acquired by the
Company. In a subsequent transaction, Vitafort acquired Sacramento Commercial
Bank's interest in the litigation proceeds. The Company may be obligated to pay
a portion of any recovery to the Company against New Life to AFI's bankruptcy
estate and/or its creditors, as well as a portion of any recovery against any
defendant to the Auburn Farms Vindication Limited Partnership which is
committed to funding a significant part of the litigation expense. The Company
intends to pursue this litigation vigorously. There is no assurance given that
the Company will receive any recovery. The Company believes that the
distribution of the Auburn Farms products was substantially injured by unfair
competition from Barbara's Bakery and New Life.
On September 29, 1998, a complaint was filed in Superior Court, the County
of Los Angeles, in an action entitled "Kirtland & Packard LLP, a California
Limited Liability Partnership vs. Vitafort, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; and
Does 1-25 inclusive." The complaint alleges Breach of Contract, Fraud,
Negligent Misrepresentation, Common Counts, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good
Faith and Fair Dealing, Negligent Performance of Contract, and Declaratory
Relief, arising out of a contract for legal services. The Complaint seeks
damages in the amount of $85,000 plus interest and attorneys fees, and for such
other and further relief as the Court Deems just and proper. The Company is
vigorously defending the suit.
F-24
<PAGE>
In addition to the items discussed in this note, the Company is a party to
legal proceedings in the ordinary course of its business. The Company believes
that the nature of these proceedings (which generally relate to disputes between
the Company and its suppliers or customers regarding payment for products sold
or supplied) are typical for a company of its size and scope, and that none of
these proceedings are material to its financial condition.
NOTE 15 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has entered into related party transactions during 1997 and
1998. See Notes 10, 11, 12, 18, and 19 for further detailed information.
NOTE 16 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic
and diluted (loss) earnings per share computation:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1998 1997
------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Basic (loss) earnings per share
Net (loss) income $(4,258,005) $ 473,031
Deemed dividends (629,148) (305,749)
----------- ----------
(Loss) income available to common stockholders (numerator) $(4,887,153) $ 167,282
=========== ==========
Weighted average common shares outstanding (denominator) 7,348,093 5,831,404
=========== ==========
Basic (loss) earnings per share $ (.66) $ 0.03
=========== ==========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
(Loss) income available to common shareholders (numerator) $ 167,282
==========
</TABLE>
F-25
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding 5,831,404
Weighted average options outstanding 2,511,516
Weighted average convertible preferred stock 6,667
Stock acquired with proceeds (2,006,190)
-----------
Weighted average common shares and
assumed conversions outstanding (denominator) 6,343,397
===========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 0.03
===========
</TABLE>
Options and warrants to purchase 8,751,028 and 958,565 shares of common
stock at various prices per share, at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively,
as well as 1,463,415 shares reflecting conversion of the convertible note
payable assuming it was converted at December 31, 1998, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect would be
antidilutive.
The diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been calculated for 1998
because the Company incurred a loss and all potentially dilutive securities are
antidilutive. The diluted loss per share for 1998 is the same as the basic loss
per share.
NOTE 17 - MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The carrying amount and fair value (based on quoted market prices) of
securities available for sale at December 31, 1998, is $250,000.
F-26
<PAGE>
NOTE 18 - LITIGATION RECOVERY, NET OF COSTS
On June 20, 1997, the Company received notice of the interim award under
the arbitration with the Keebler Company. The award was for $5,983,923 as well
as compensation for all legal fees and costs associated with the arbitration
proceedings. Based on the agreement with ATCOLP INVESTMENT PARTNERS (the
"Lender"), in which Donald Wohl, a Director of the Company, is the general
partner, the Company agreed to pay the Lender a sliding percentage of the
proceeds from the settlement in exchange for advancing $300,000 to the Company
to meet the litigation expenses. The Board of Directors, with Mr. Wohl
abstaining, considered two bids and found his to be the more reasonable of the
two.
On July 15, 1997, the Company received $6,750,000 in full and final
settlement. Of that amount, $1,055,608 was paid for legal fees and costs, plus
$1,236,885 to ATCOLP INVESTMENT PARTNERS under the existing agreement and
$300,000 to repay the loan. Also, the Company issued a warrant for 200,000
shares of common stock to ATCOLP INVESTMENT PARTNERS as additional
consideration. The Company recorded $138,000 as additional fees to ATCOLP for
the warrant, that amount being the estimated fair value of non-registered
securities on that day. Additionally, the Company was able to cancel $140,829
in debt due to the Keebler Company. The amount of the award, $5,983,000, has
been reported as income, under the heading litigation, net of costs, while the
difference between the $6,750,000 award and the $5,983,000 recovery, or
$767,000, has been treated as a reimbursement of expenses in the general and
administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 1997.
NOTE 19 - RECENT FINANCING AGREEMENTS
Effective December 30, 1998, the Company completed the Closing under a
series of agreements including a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the "CSPA"),
dated as of December 30, 1998, by and among the Company; Terra Healthy Living,
Ltd., a B.V.I. corporation ("Terra"); Sovereign Partners Limited Partnership, a
Connecticut limited partnership ("Sov"); and Dominion Capital Fund, Ltd., a
Bahamian corporation ("Dom"). Pursuant to the CSPA and the related documents:
Terra acquired 2,712,843 shares of the Company's common stock from Sov and
Dom for $235,000. Such shares were issued by the Company upon the conversion by
Sov and Dom of an aggregate of 235 shares of the Company's 1997 Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred").
The Company borrowed $2,065,000 from Terra pursuant to a Promissory Note
With Warrant and Registration Rights (the "Terra Note"). The Terra Note is a
five year note bearing interest at 6% per annum. Interest on the Terra Note is
payable annually. The Terra Note provides for the issuance to Terra of a five
year warrant (the "Terra Warrant") for the purchase of 500,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at $.25 per share. The Terra Note further provides that
the first year's interest on the Terra Note shall be applied to the partial
exercise of the Terra Warrant.
The Company applied the $2,065,000 proceeds of the Terra Note to redeem all
1,351 remaining shares of Series A Preferred held by Sov and Dom, as well as a
convertible debenture in the amount of $548,352 held by Dom.
The aggregate of $2,300,00 paid by Terra in connection with its purchase of
the 2,712,843 shares of the Company's common stock from Sov and Dom and in
connection with the Terra Note was satisfied through the delivery to Sov and Dom
of marketable securities having a value of $2,300,000. Under the CSPA, Terra
made certain assurances to Sov and Dom and assumed certain obligations to assure
that Sov and Dom would realize $2,300,000 on the sale of the marketable
securities.
The Company borrowed $300,000 from each of Sov and Dom pursuant to a non-
negotiable nine month promissory note bearing interest at 8% per annum (the "Sov
Note" and the "Dom Note"). These notes provide for their repayment, at the
option of the Company, in registered common stock of the Company which shall be
valued at the then market for such stock. The Sov Note and the Dom Note provide
for the issuance to each of Sov and Dom of 60,000 warrants which expire on
December 31, 2003, half of which are exercisable at $.40 and half of which are
exercisable at $.25. If the Company repays the Sov Note or the Dom Note with
common stock, as provided in such notes, then the exercise price of the $.25
warrant is reduced to $.01.
The CSPA granted the Company the right to redeem up to 2,000,000 of the
shares of its common stock acquired by Terra through June 30, 2000, based upon a
formula related to the market price of the common stock at the time of the
redemption.
In addition, the Company issued 571,232 shares of its common stock to Sov
in connection with Sov's prior conversion of 40 shares of Series A Preferred
Stock.
F-27
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
---------------------------------------------------
Vitafort International Corporation
Los Angeles, California
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 No. 33-300435, No. 33-307989, No. 33-317763, No. 33-331479, No. 33-
335067 and No. 333-56043 of Vitafort International Corporation of our report
dated April 15, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Vitafort
International Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31,
1998, annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Vitafort International Corporation and
Subsidiaries.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Los Angeles, California
May 24, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1998
<CASH> 903,649
<SECURITIES> 250,000
<RECEIVABLES> 970,781
<ALLOWANCES> 41,775
<INVENTORY> 196,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 2,411,767
<PP&E> 334,615
<DEPRECIATION> 271,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 3,387,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,026,795
<BONDS> 0
0
11
<COMMON> 1,206
<OTHER-SE> (1,706,788)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 3,387,530
<SALES> 2,861,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 2,861,392
<CGS> 1,876,319
<TOTAL-COSTS> 4,955,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 62,339
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 221,547
<INCOME-PRETAX> (4,254,598)
<INCOME-TAX> 3,407
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (4,258,005)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> (629,148)
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (4,887,153)
<EPS-BASIC> .67
<EPS-DILUTED> .67
</TABLE>
