<PAGE> 1
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
1997 FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. (NO FEE REQUIRED)
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. (NO FEE REQUIRED)
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO ____________.
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-18309
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
TEXAS 74-2558926
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
ONE SUGAR CREEK CENTER BLVD., SUITE 600, SUGAR LAND, TEXAS 77478-3556
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
</TABLE>
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (281) 243-3000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
------------------- -----------------------
<S> <C>
COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET
PREFERRED SHARE PURCHASE PRICE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET
</TABLE>
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ].
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
AGGREGATE MARKET VALUE OF THE COMMON STOCK HELD BY
NONAFFILIATES ON MARCH 24, 1998 -- $1,152,868,835
NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING
ON MARCH 24, 1998, - 52,188,737
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(1) Certain portions of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held May 14, 1998 -
Part III
================================================================================
<PAGE> 2
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC.
1997 FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
PART I
Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Item 2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Item 3. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . 14
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . 42
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
</TABLE>
(i)
<PAGE> 3
PART 1
ITEM 1 BUSINESS
GENERAL
Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, the
"Company") was incorporated in Texas in January 1990. Since 1966, the Company
or its predecessors have been engaged in offshore contract drilling of oil and
gas wells for independent and major oil and gas companies. Operations are
conducted in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, India and Southeast Asia. The Company's
principal office is located at One Sugar Creek Center Blvd., Suite 600, Sugar
Land, Texas 77478 and its telephone number is (281) 243-3000.
The Company owns and operates a fleet of 16 offshore drilling rigs
consisting of five independent leg jack-up units, three of which have a
cantilever feature, nine mat supported jack-up units, four of which have a
cantilever feature and two semi-submersible units. Additionally the Company
operates one additional semi-submersible drilling rig under a five-year bareboat
charter (the "Charter"). As of the date hereof, twelve of the Company's rigs are
under contract in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, one rig is under contract off the
east coast of India, two rigs are operating in Southeast Asia, one rig is being
upgraded in Southeast Asia and one rig is under construction in the U. S. Gulf
of Mexico.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The key elements of Company's strategy are to:
o Maintain Significant Presence in the Gulf of Mexico. With 12 of its 14
jack-up rigs located in the Gulf of Mexico, Marine is well positioned to
benefit from the currently strong Gulf of Mexico market and from any
further improvement in that market.
o Grow Through Acquisitions and Upgrades. The Company is actively seeking
attractive opportunities for acquisitions to increase the size and
capabilities of its fleet. The Company also has an ongoing program to
upgrade and refurbish its fleet in order to enhance its operational
capabilities and competitiveness.
o Build a Diversified Revenue Base. To complement its position in the Gulf
of Mexico, the Company's strategy is to build upon and diversify its
revenue base by seeking an appropriate balance of long-term and short-term
contracts. The Company intends to pursue this strategy through increased
exposure to international markets and entrance into the deep water drilling
sector. Currently, the Company has long-term international contracts on two
of its jack-up rigs, the MARINE 201 and the MARINE 305.
Additionally the Company has long-term contracts on its deep water drilling
assets which include the MARINE 500, the MARINE 700 and the charter of the
Marine 510 (formerly the KANTAN 3). Although the Company has a minimal
history of operations in the deep water drilling sector, the Company has
several key employees who have significant experience in this area. The
Company is aggressively pursuing expansion opportunities in this sector.
o Maintain an Efficient Cost Structure. The Company's efficient cost
structure is an essential element in realizing its goal of maximizing its
profit margins and return on assets. The Company's incentive plans are
designed to maintain a strong employee and management focus upon this
objective.
1
<PAGE> 4
o Maintain Reputation for Quality Service and Safety. The Company
continually strives to maintain and enhance its reputation for providing
quality service. Crew quality is an important factor that customers
consider when choosing a rig. The Company is focused on retaining trained
and talented employees who are committed to the Company's high standards of
quality service and safety.
o Maintain Appropriate Capital Structure. The offshore drilling business is
subject to substantial fluctuations in demand, pricing and profitability.
The Company believes that it is appropriate to maintain a level of debt
appropriate for the size and mix of its revenue base and to maintain
significant levels of liquidity to enable it to better withstand industry
cyclicality. The Company has a $100 million credit facility available to
provide flexibility. The Company is currently in discussions with its
lenders about possibly increasing this credit facility. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation --
Financial Condition -- Liquidity and Capital Resources."
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
In December 1997, the Company signed a contract with HAM Marine Shipyard
to complete the construction of the Marine 700. The construction project is
scheduled to be completed during the first quarter of 1999 at which time the
Marine 700 will be configured as a fourth generation semi-submersible rig
equipped to work in water depth up to 5,000 feet. During January 1998, the
Company signed a contract with Esso Exploration Inc., an affiliate of Exxon
Corporation for the Marine 700. This contract is expected to begin the first
quarter of 1999 and generate aggregate day rate revenues of approximately $207
million over the three year primary term of the contract, unless Esso elects,
prior to July 1, 1998, to extend the contract to a five year term in which event
the contract would be expected to generate aggregate day rate revenues of
approximately $302 million over the five year term.
In December 1997, the Company also signed a contract with Jurong
Shipyard Limited in Singapore to perform the upgrade on the Marine 500 to
increase its water depth capacity to 5,000 feet with 15,000 psi drilling
equipment. The upgrade is expected to take four to six months and will begin
during July 1998.
In December 1997, the Company entered into a nine-month contract with
Premier Oil for the MARINE 510. The contract is expected to commence mid-April
1998 and generate revenues of approximately $23 million.
DRILLING MARKETS AND UTILIZATION
General. Offshore drilling is a highly cyclical business. The
Company's operations are materially dependent upon the levels of activity in oil
and gas exploration, development and production. Such activity levels are
affected by both short-term and long-term trends in oil and gas prices. In
recent years, oil and gas prices have been volatile. Worldwide military,
political and economic events have contributed to, and are likely to continue to
contribute to, price volatility. Other factors which affect oil and gas prices
include, worldwide demand for oil and gas, the ability of the Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") to set and maintain production levels and
prices, the level of production by non-OPEC countries, domestic and foreign tax
policy and the policies of the various governments regarding exploration and
development of their oil and gas reserves.
Profitability in the offshore contract drilling industry has increased
significantly since 1995. Generally improved oil and natural gas prices
combined with improved exploration and production technology significantly
increased demand for offshore drilling services. As a result, the worldwide
market for jack-up rigs has improved with most major offshore markets showing
increasing demand. This increased demand combined with a continuing decline in
the number of marketable rigs has led to increasing day rates. According to
Offshore Data Services, as of March 24, 1998, worldwide jack-up utilization was
89% (338 rigs working out of a supply of 380 rigs) compared to 89%, 86% and 78%
average utilization experienced during 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
2
<PAGE> 5
The deep water market for semi-submersible rigs has also experienced
improved demand and higher day rates during the past several years, due in part
to the increasing impact of technological advances that have broadened
opportunities for offshore exploration and development. Most semi-submersible
markets experienced increased utilization and significantly higher day rates in
1996 and 1997, and customers increasingly are seeking to contract rigs serving
these markets for stated terms (as opposed to contracts for the drilling of a
single well or a group of wells). Worldwide semi-submersible rig utilization as
of March 24, 1998 was 79% (118 rigs working out of a supply of 150 rigs)
compared to 81%, 79% and 70% average utilization during 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
Although rig utilization and day rates remain relatively favorable, oil
prices have declined substantially since October 1997. There can be no
assurance that oil and gas companies will not significantly reduce their current
levels of exploration and development expenditure, which reduction would
adversely affect the demand for the Company' services resulting in lower
utilization and day rates.
Gulf of Mexico. The jack-up drilling market in the Gulf of Mexico is
highly competitive. A significant number of offshore drilling companies have
rigs in this market and, as a result, no one contractor is able to materially
affect pricing levels. Day rates can and have fluctuated significantly on
relatively small changes in the rig supply and demand situation in this market.
Since mid-1995, a combination of improved jack-up rig demand and rig
mobilizations to other markets has resulted in improved jack-up utilization and
day rates. Utilization of jack-up rigs in this market as of March 24, 1998 was
92% (120 rigs working out of a supply of 130 rigs) as compared with an average
of 90%, 87% and 75% for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. With 12 of its 14
jack-up rigs located in the Gulf of Mexico, the Company is well positioned to
benefit from the improved rig demand in this market.
India. In 1995, the Company entered into a one-year term contract for
the MARINE 201 to operate off the east coast of India. The rig commenced
operations under this contract in mid-November 1995. Under the contract, the
customer had options to extend the contract for up to eight three-month periods.
All of the options have been exercised ensuring the rig's employment through
November 1998.
Southeast Asia. In January 1997, the Company entered into a one-year
contract with a major oil company for the MARINE 305 to begin work in Southeast
Asia. The contract began in August 1997 and is expected to generate total
revenues of approximately $28,000,000. This contract includes options that
could, if exercised, extend its term for up to an additional year at mutually
agreed rates. The rig, which was acquired in August 1996, was upgraded and
refurbished in the Middle East.
In December 1996, the Company acquired the MARINE 500, a
second-generation semi-submersible rig. The rig began operating in late
February drilling offshore Indonesia on a short-term contract. In April 1997 the
Company entered into a three-well contract for the Marine 500 to operate in the
Gulf of Thailand offshore Malaysia. This contract includes three option wells,
which if exercised will extend the contract until mid-1998. In July 1997, the
Company entered into a three-year contract for the Marine 500 to commence on or
before January 1, 1999 and includes operations in Southeast Asia, the Pacific
Rim, offshore Australia and New Zealand. Before this contract can commence, the
MARINE 500 will be upgraded to work in water depths up to 5,000 feet with 15,000
psi drilling equipment. The upgrade is expected to take four to six months. See
"Recent Developments" on the previous page.
In December 1997 the Company signed a nine-month contract to operate
the Marine 510, a bareboat charter, in Southeast Asia which is scheduled to
commence in April 1998.
CONTRACTS
The Company's existing drilling contracts generally provide for
compensation on a "daywork" basis. Under daywork contracts, the Company
receives a fixed amount per day for providing drilling services using the rigs
it operates. Under most daywork contracts, the Company pays virtually all costs
associated with operating the rig such as labor, operating supplies and repair
and maintenance. The customer pays the cost of moving the rig and related
equipment to the job site and all other costs of drilling the well such as mud,
casing, logging and completion services. Daywork contracts may provide for
lower rates during periods
3
<PAGE> 6
when drilling operations are interrupted or restricted by equipment breakdowns,
adverse weather or water conditions or other conditions beyond the control of
the Company. Historically, the Company has not marketed its rigs under fixed
price or turnkey contracts.
A daywork contract generally extends over a period of time covering
either the drilling of a single well, a group of wells or a stated term. The
customer may terminate the contract if the drilling rig is destroyed or lost, or
if drilling operations are suspended for a specified period of time as a result
of breakdown of major equipment or other specific events. The duration of
drilling contracts is generally determined by market demand and competitive
conditions. Historically, domestic drilling contracts have tended to be on a
well-by-well basis, while contracts in the deep water and international jack-up
markets typically have tended to be on a term basis. The Company's experience
during recent years has been consistent with this general rule, with the
Company's rigs operating in the Gulf of Mexico generally having been contracted
on a well-to-well basis and its rigs operating internationally operating under
term contracts. As a result of the substantial improvement in the Gulf of
Mexico drilling market, however, the Company has recently been able to obtain
term contracts on its domestic rigs, although the terms have been of relatively
short duration. Due to the highly cyclical nature of the offshore drilling
business the Company, to the extent available, will continue to focus upon
obtaining additional term contracts, both foreign and domestic, in the future.
Such contracts help mitigate the volatility of the Company's results.
The Company obtains most of its contracts through competitive bidding
against other contractors in response to oil and gas companies' solicitations of
bids. The Company's current drilling contracts, both foreign and domestic,
provide for payment in U.S. Dollars.
CUSTOMERS
The Company provides drilling services to a customer base that includes
independent and major foreign and domestic oil and gas companies. As is typical
in the industry, the Company does business with a relatively small number of
customers at any given time. During 1997, the Company performed services for
approximately 31 different customers. For the year ended December 31, 1997, one
customer, Applied Drilling Technology, Inc., accounted for approximately 25% of
the Company's total consolidated revenues. The loss of any one of the Company's
customers could, at least on a short-term basis, have a material adverse effect
on the Company's profitability. Management believes, however, that at current
levels of activity, the Company would have alternative customers for its
services if it lost any single customer, and that the loss of any one customer
would not have a material adverse effect on the Company on a long-term basis.
See Note 11 of audited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information
regarding the Company's major customers.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
General. The Company is subject to numerous domestic and foreign
governmental laws and regulations that relate directly or indirectly to its
operations, including certain laws and regulations (a) controlling the discharge
of materials into the environment, (b) requiring removal and cleanup under
certain circumstances, (c) requiring the proper handling and disposal of waste
materials, or (d) otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. For
example, the Company, as an operator of mobile offshore drilling rigs in waters
of the United States and certain foreign offshore areas, may be liable for
damages and for the cost of removing oil spills for which it is held
responsible, subject to certain limitations. Laws and regulations protecting
the environment have become more stringent in recent years and may, in certain
circumstances, assess civil and criminal penalties and impose "strict
liability," rendering a company liable for environmental damage without regard
to negligence or fault on the part of such company. Such laws and regulations
may expose the Company to liability for the conduct of or conditions caused by
others or for acts of the Company that were in compliance with all applicable
laws and regulations at the time such acts were performed. The application of
these requirements or the adoption of new requirements could have a material
adverse effect on the Company. The Company believes that it has conducted its
operations in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and
regulations.
4
<PAGE> 7
The Company has generally been able to obtain contractual
indemnification in its drilling contracts against pollution and environmental
damages that are not caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the
Company, but there can be no assurance that such indemnification will be
enforceable in all instances, that the customer will be financially able in all
cases to comply with its indemnity obligations, or that the Company will be able
to obtain such indemnification agreements in the future.
The Company maintains insurance coverage against certain environmental
liabilities, but there can be no assurance that such insurance will continue to
be available or carried by the Company or, if available and carried, will be
adequate to cover the Company's liability in the event of a catastrophic
occurrence.
U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990. The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990
("OPA '90") and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto impose a variety of
regulations on "responsible parties" related to the prevention of oil spills and
liability for damages resulting from such spills. A "responsible party"
includes the owner or operator of an onshore facility, a pipeline or a vessel,
or the lessee or permittee of the area in which an offshore facility is located.
OPA '90 assigns liability to each responsible party for oil removal costs and a
variety of public and private damages. While liability limits apply in some
circumstances, a responsible party for an Outer Continental Shelf facility must
pay all spill removal costs incurred by a federal, state or local government.
OPA '90 establishes liability limits (subject to indexing) for mobile offshore
drilling rigs. If functioning as an offshore facility, the mobile offshore
drilling rigs are considered "tank vessels" for spills of oil on or above the
water surface, with liability limits of the greater of $1,200 per gross ton or
$10 million. To the extent damages and removal costs exceed this amount, the
mobile offshore drilling rigs will be treated as an offshore facility and the
offshore lessee will be responsible up to higher liability limits of all removal
costs plus $75 million. A party cannot take advantage of liability limits if
the spill was caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct or resulted from
violation of a federal safety, construction, or operating regulation. If the
party fails to report a spill or to cooperate fully in the cleanup, liability
limits likewise do not apply. Few defenses exist to the liability imposed by
OPA '90.
OPA '90 also imposes ongoing requirements on a responsible party. A
failure to comply with ongoing requirements or inadequate cooperation in a spill
event may subject a responsible party to civil or criminal enforcement action.
In short, OPA '90 places a burden on drilling rig owners or operators to conduct
safe operations and take other measures to prevent oil spills. If a spill
occurs, OPA '90 then imposes liability for resulting damages.
The ongoing requirements of OPA '90 include proof of financial
responsibility (to cover at least some costs in a potential spill), and
preparation of an oil spill contingency plan. OPA requires owners and operators
of vessels over 300 gross tons to provide the U.S. Coast Guard with evidence of
financial responsibility to cover the costs of cleaning up oil spills from such
vessels. Moreover, certain amendments to OPA '90 that were enacted in 1996
requires owners and operators of offshore facilities that have a worst case oil
spill potential of more than 1,000 barrels to demonstrate financial
responsibility in amounts ranging from $10 million in specified state waters to
$35 million in federal OCS waters, with higher amounts, up to $150 million, in
certain limited circumstances where the Minerals Management Service ("MMS")
believes such a level is justified by the risks posed by the quantity or quality
of oil that is handled by the facility. On March 25, 1997, the MMS promulgated
a proposed rule implementing the OPA '90 financial responsibility requirements
for offshore facilities. The Company believes that it currently has established
adequate proof of financial responsibility for its mobile offshore drilling rigs
functioning as offshore facilities. However, the Company cannot predict whether
financial responsibility requirements under the OPA '90 amendments or the
proposed rule will result in the imposition of substantial additional annual
costs to the Company in the future or otherwise materially adversely affect the
Company, nevertheless, the impact of any such financial responsibility
requirement ultimately imposed by the MMS should be no more burdensome on the
Company than on similarly situated or less capitalized drilling contractors
operating in U.S. waters.
5
<PAGE> 8
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (U.S.). The Outer Continental Shelf
Lands Act authorizes regulations relating to safety and environmental protection
applicable to lessees and permittees operating on the Outer Continental Shelf.
Specific design and operational standards may apply to Outer Continental Shelf
vessels, rigs, platforms, vehicles and structures. Violations of lease terms
relating to environmental matters or regulations issued pursuant to the Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act can result in substantial civil and criminal
penalties as well as potential court injunctions curtailing operations and the
cancellation of leases. Such enforcement liabilities can result from either
governmental or citizen prosecution.
CERCLA and RCRA (U.S.). The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), as amended, currently
exempts crude oil, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), as
amended, currently exempts certain drilling materials, such as drilling fluids
and produced water, from the definitions of hazardous substances and hazardous
wastes for purposes of these statutes. The Company's operations, however, may
involve the use or handling of other material that may be classified as
environmentally hazardous substances or wastes. There can be no assurances that
these exemptions will be preserved in future amendments of such acts, if any, or
that more stringent federal or state laws and regulations protecting the
environment will not be adopted. CERCLA assigns strict liability to each
responsible party for all response and remediation costs, as well as natural
resource damage. Few defenses exist to the liability imposed by CERCLA.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION
The Company's business is affected by political developments and by
federal, state, foreign and local laws and regulations that relate directly to
the oil and gas industry. The adoption of laws and regulations curtailing
exploration and developmental drilling for oil and gas for economic,
environmental or other policy reasons would and have adversely affected the
operations of the Company by limiting available drilling opportunities for its
customers and/or increasing the costs of such activities to the Company or its
customers. The Company believes that it has conducted its operations in
substantial compliance with applicable governmental laws and regulations.
OPERATIONAL RISKS AND INSURANCE
Contract drilling operations are subject to various risks including
blowouts, cratering, fires and explosions, each of which could result in damage
to or destruction of drilling rigs and oil and gas wells, damage to life and
property, suspension of operations, and environmental damage through oil
spillage and extensive uncontrolled fires. The Company insures its drilling
rigs and plant assets for amounts approximating used equipment replacement cost
and also insures against catastrophic losses resulting from employer's liability
and other risks customary in the energy service industry. The Company currently
maintains insurance coverage it believes to be customary in the industry against
certain general and marine public liabilities, including liabilities for
personal injuries. Except in limited circumstances, this insurance does not
cover liability for pollution or environmental damage that originates below the
water surface, although the Company is generally indemnified against such
pollution and environmental liabilities by its customers. There is no assurance
that such insurance or indemnification will be adequate to protect the Company
against liability from all consequences of well disasters, extensive fire damage
or damage to the environment. Recognizing these risks, the Company has programs
that are designed to promote a safe environment for its personnel and equipment.
COMPETITION
The contract drilling industry is highly competitive, and the Company
competes with many drilling contractors which are substantially larger than the
Company with greater financial and other resources. Customers often award
contracts on a competitive bid bases, and although a customer selecting a rig
may consider, among other things, a contractor's safety record, crew quality and
quality of service and equipment, the historical oversupply of rigs has created
an intensely competitive market in which price is the primary factor in
determining the selection of a drilling contractor. However, due to the recent
escalation of drilling activity, rig availability has, in some cases, also
become a consideration. The Company believes that
6
<PAGE> 9
competition for drilling contracts will continue to be intense in the
foreseeable future. Contractors are also able to adjust localized supply and
demand imbalances by moving rigs from areas of low utilization and day rates to
areas of greater activity and relatively higher day rates. In addition, there
are inactive non-marketed rigs that could be reactivated to meet an increase in
demand for drilling rigs in any given market. Such movements or reactivations
or a decrease in drilling activity in any major market could depress day rates
and could adversely affect utilization of the Company's rigs.
In addition, the recent improvement in the current results of operations
and prospects for the offshore contract drilling industry as a whole has led to
increased rig construction and enhancement programs by the Company and its
competitors. A significant increase in the supply of new or enhanced rigs may
have an adverse effect on the average operating day rates for the Company's
rigs, particularly its semi-submersible units, and on the overall utilization
level of the company's fleet. In such case, the Company's results of operations
would be adversely affected.
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
The Company's international operations are also subject to certain
political, economic and other uncertainties including, among others, risks of
war and civil disturbances, expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation or
nullification of existing contracts, taxation policies, environmental
regulation, foreign exchange restrictions, changing political conditions,
international monetary fluctuations and other hazards arising out of foreign
governmental sovereignty over certain areas in which the Company conducts
operations. To date the Company has experienced no material loss as a result of
any of these factors.
CONSTRUCTION RISKS
There are risks associated with all major construction projects or
upgrades performed on drilling rigs. These risks could delay or even prohibit
completion of the project. This in turn could cause substantial loss of revenue
due to the loss of a contract or the failure to begin a contract in a timely
manner. Some of the risks include, but are not limited to, the following: (i)
delay or shortages of material, equipment or personnel; (ii) lockouts or strikes
by employees of the contractor; (iii) financial distress on the part of the
contractor; (iv) an event of force majeure; and (v) faulty engineering or
construction errors.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 24, 1998, the Company had approximately 942 employees. The
number of employees varies throughout the year depending on the level of
drilling activity. The Company considers relations with its employees to be
good. None of the Company's employees is presently represented by labor unions.
Crew quality is an important factor considered by the customer in
selecting a rig. Accordingly, the Company seeks experienced personnel when
selecting crews from among the available applicants and the Company maintains a
safety and personal training program. Due to the recent increases in demand for
drilling services in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, there is currently a shortage of
experienced, qualified personnel. The Company has been forced to raise its wage
rates several times in recent months in order to attract and retain qualified
personnel.
7
<PAGE> 10
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
DRILLING RIG FLEET
Jack-up Rigs. The Company owned 14 jack-up rigs as of March 24, 1998.
Jack-up rigs are mobile self-elevating drilling platforms equipped with legs
that can be lowered to the ocean floor until a foundation is established to
support the drilling platform. An offshore jack-up rig consists of a hull,
which supports the drilling equipment, jacking system, crew quarters, loading
and unloading facilities, storage areas for bulk and liquid materials,
helicopter landing deck and other related equipment. The rig legs may operate
independently or have a lower hull or mat attached to the lower portion of the
legs in order to provide a more stable foundation in soft bottom areas. Nine of
the Company's rigs are mat supported rigs and five are of independent leg
design. Five of the mat supported rigs and two of the independent leg rigs are
of slot type design, which are configured for the drilling operations to take
place through a slot in the hull. The Company's other four mat supported rigs
and three of the independent leg rigs have a cantilever feature which allows the
extension of the drilling equipment over a customer's platform to perform
development drilling or workover operations. The Company's jack-up rigs are
capable of drilling to depths of 20,000 to 30,000 feet in maximum water depths
ranging from 200 to 300 feet.
There are several factors that determine the type of rig most suitable
for a particular job, the most significant of which include the water depth and
bottom conditions at the proposed drilling location, whether the drilling is
being done over a platform or other structure, and the intended well depth.
Independent leg jack-up rigs typically have greater water depth capability and
are advantageous in offshore areas where uneven bottom conditions or
obstructions, such as pipelines, exist. Mat supported rigs are advantageous in
offshore areas with soft bottom conditions. A slot design is appropriate for
drilling exploratory wells in the absence of any existing permanent structure,
such as a production platform, although some slot design rigs are capable of
drilling over production platforms. A cantilevered jack-up can extend its drill
floor and derrick over an existing, fixed structure, thereby permitting the rig
to drill or work over a well located on such a structure. Jack-up rigs with the
cantilever feature historically have achieved higher utilization and day rates.
The Company has top drive drilling systems installed on ten of its rigs.
A top drive drilling system allows drilling with 90-foot lengths of drill pipe
rather than 30-foot lengths, thus reducing the number of required connections. A
top drive drilling system also permits rotation of the drill string while
tripping in or out of the hole. These characteristics increase drilling speed,
personnel safety and drilling efficiency and reduce the risk of the drill string
sticking during operations.
Currently the Company has two jack-up rigs working in international
markets. The Company has three additional rigs which are suitable for operations
in selected international waters and the Company's other rigs could, with
certain modifications, work in other international markets. The Company's
jack-ups, however, are not suitable for those areas that require hostile
environment capabilities, such as the North Sea, or in deep waters in excess of
200 to 300 feet.
Semi-submersible Rigs. The Company owned two semi-submersibles and had
a long-term charter on one additional semi- submersible as of March 24, 1998.
Semi-submersibles operate in various market areas around the world usually in
water depths where jack-up rigs are incapable of working. Semi-submersible rigs
consist of an upper working and living deck resting on vertical columns
connected to lower hull members. Such rigs operate in a "semi-submerged"
position, remaining afloat, off bottom, in a position in which the lower hull is
from about 55 to 90 feet below the water line and the upper deck protrudes well
above the surface. The rig is typically anchored in position and remains stable
for drilling in the semi-submerged floating position due in part to its wave
transparency characteristics at the water line. Semi-submersible rigs normally
require water depth of at least 200 feet in order to conduct operations.
Typically semi- submersible rigs are more expensive to construct and operate
than jack-up rigs.
8
<PAGE> 11
The following table describes the Company's drilling rigs as of March 24, 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR RATED RATED
BUILT/ WATER DRILLING
NAME OF RIG MAKE/DESIGN TYPE REBUILT DEPTH DEPTH LOCATION
- ----------- ----------- ---- -------- ----- ----- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Independent Leg Jack-up Rigs:
MARINE 300 T(a)(b)(c) F&G*/L780 MOD II Cantilever 1981 250' 30,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 301T F&G*/L780 MOD II Cantilever 1981 300' 25,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 303 T(c) F&G*/L780 MOD II Cantilever 1982 300' 30,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 304 T(c) MLT**/84S Slot 1976/1993 300' 30,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 305 T(c) Levingston III-S Cantilever 1975/1997 300' 30,000' Myanmar
Mat Supported Jack-up Rigs:
MARINE 3 Bethlehem/262 Slot 1974 262' 25,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 4 Bethlehem/250 Slot 1975 250' 25,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 15 T Baker Marine/250 Slot 1981/1996 250' 25,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 16 T Bethlehem/250 Slot 1981/1995 250' 20,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 17 Bethlehem/200 Cantilever 1981 200' 20,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 18 Bethlehem/250 Cantilever 1982 250' 20,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 200 T Bethlehem/200 Cantilever 1981 200' 20,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 201 T(c) Bethlehem/200 Cantilever 1981/1995 200' 20,000' India
MARINE 225 Bethlehem/225 Slot 1969/1993 225' 20,000' U.S. Gulf of Mexico
Semi-Submersible Rig:
MARINE 500 T, SP(c) Offshore Co. Semi-Submersible 1975 600' 30,000' Southeast Asia
MARINE 700(d) Bingo 8000 Semi-Submersible 1997 U.S. Gulf of Mexico
MARINE 510(c)(e) 6 Col Dual Pontoon Semi-Submersible 1984/1996 600' 20,000' Southeast Asia
</TABLE>
(a) Can be modified to provide for 300-foot water depth capacity
(b) Designed to operate in environmentally sensitive areas such as Mobile Bay
(c) Configured for international operations
(d) Currently under construction and is expected to be complete during the first
quarter of 1999. Upon completion of construction, it should have 7,500'
rated water depth and 30,000' rated drilling depth.
(e) Under five year charter agreement which is expected to begin mid-April 1998
(see Note 10 to the Company's consolidated financial statements)
T Equipped with top drive drilling system
* Friede & Goldman
** Marathon LeTourneau
9
<PAGE> 12
Independent Leg Jack-up Rig - This type of rig
consists of a floating hull with three independent
elevated legs. After being towed to the drilling
location, the legs are lowered until they penetrate
[OIL RIG PHOTO] the seabed and the hull is jacked to the desired
elevation above sea level. The rig depicted in the
diagram has a cantilever feature that permits the
rig to operate over an existing, fixed platform or
other structure.
Mat Supported Jack-up Rig - This type of rig
consists of a floating upper hull with three legs
which are attached to a lower hull commonly
referred to as a mat. After being towed to the
drilling location, the legs are lowered until the
[OIL RIG PHOTO] mat contacts the seabed and the upper hull is
jacked to the desired elevation above sea level.
One advantage of mat supported rigs is the ability
to operate in areas having soft seabed conditions
where independent leg rigs are prone to have
excessive penetration and subject to leg damage.
The rig depicted is cantilevered.
Semi-submersible Rig - This type of rig
consists of an upper working and living deck
resting on vertical columns connected to lower hull
members. Such rigs operate in a "semi-submerged"
position, remaining afloat, off bottom, in a
[OIL RIG PHOTO] position in which the lower hull is from about 55
to 90 feet below the water line and the upper deck
protrudes well above the surface. The rig is
typically anchored in position and remains stable
for drilling in the semi-submerged floating
position due in part to its wave transparency
characteristics at the water line.
10
<PAGE> 13
BAREBOAT CHARTER
In July 1997, the Company entered into a Charter Agreement with
Shanghai Bureau of Marine Geological Survey to charter the KANTAN 3, now
referred to as the Marine 510, a semi-submersible, for a period of five years.
The Marine 510 is a 600-foot water depth rig based upon the Pacesetter design
and was built in China in 1984. The Charter Agreement begins when the rig
commences operations under a drilling contract that is expected to be mid-April
1998. The Charter agreement and related agreements requires the Company to pay
approximately $31,000 per day during the first year, $28,000 per day during the
second year and $29,500 per day for the last three years for each day that the
Marine 510 is working.
FACILITIES
The Company's principal executive offices are located in Sugar Land,
Texas and occupy approximately 19,000 square feet of leased space. The Company
also leases a warehouse, storage and repair facility, including approximately
31 acres of land and 60,000 square feet of buildings, in Rosharon, Texas (near
Houston). In connection with the Company's foreign operations the Company
leases offices, warehouse space and employee homes in Myanmar, Malaysia,
Singapore and Norway.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Jagson International Limited, an Indian entity, has brought suit
against Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and Marine 300 Series, Inc. in Bombay,
India. The plaintiff has alleged that the Company agreed to charter two
jack-up rigs to the plaintiff during 1992 and that it breached the agreement by
failing to charter the rigs resulting in damages in excess of $14,500,000. The
Company disputes the existence of the agreement and intends to vigorously
defend the suit. Although the lawsuit has recently been filed and the
litigation is in an early stage, based on a number of substantive and
procedural defenses that the Company believes are available to it, the Company
does not believe the ultimate resolution of this dispute will have a material
adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
Various other claims have been filed against the Company and its
subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business, particularly claims alleging
personal injuries. Management believes that the Company has adequate insurance
coverage and has established adequate reserves for any liabilities that may
reasonably be expected to result from these claims. In the opinion of
management, no pending claims, actions or proceedings against the Company or
its subsidiaries are expected to have a material adverse effect on its
financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
11
<PAGE> 14
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common
Stock") trades on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol "MDCO." The
following table sets forth the range of high and low sale prices per share of
the Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market for the periods
indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 HIGH LOW
---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
First Quarter (through March 24, 1998) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $24 $13 1/8
1997
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 12 7/8
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 1/4 13 3/4
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 13/16 19 3/4
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 1/16 17
1996
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8 3/4 $ 4 7/8
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 11/16 7 7/8
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7/8 8 3/8
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3/4 9 1/8
</TABLE>
The last sale price of the Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq
Stock Market on March 24, 1998 was 22 1/8 per share and there were
approximately 509 holders of record.
The Company has not paid cash dividends on its Common Stock in the
past and does not intend to pay dividends on the Common Stock in the
foreseeable future. See Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8 of this report.
12
<PAGE> 15
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data of
the Company as of and for each of the periods indicated. The selected
financial data for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 1997
are derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements. The
information presented below should be read in conjunction with Item 7
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto
included in Item 8 of this report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
--------- -------- ------- ------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations Data:
Drilling revenues $ 190,257 $110,329 $63,067 $70,597 $82,998
Drilling expenses 77,847 59,770 55,091 50,575 45,330
Depreciation and amortization 16,995 11,576 9,377 7,733 5,312
General and administrative 7,807 7,498 5,460 4,376 8,999
Operating income (loss) 87,608 31,485 (6,861) 7,913 23,357
Interest income (expense), net 1,823 366 639 1,280 (62)
Income (loss) before income taxes 89,836 32,256 (6,102) 9,123 23,301
Income tax expense (benefit) 31,456 11,586 (2,080) 3,193 8,278
Net income (loss) $ 58,380 $20,670 $(4,022) $ 5,930 $15,023
Basic average common shares (1) 51,572 44,918 43,812 43,819 40,936
Diluted average common shares (1) 52,452 45,748 43,812 44,802 41,994
Earnings Per Share Data:
Basic $ 1.13 $0.46 $(0.09) $ 0.14 $ 0.37
Diluted $ 1.11 $0.45 $(0.09) $ 0.13 $ 0.36
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 15,619 $69,761 $12,260 $18,872 $21,969
Restricted cash 5,000 2,200 - - -
Short-term investments - 9,990 - 18,137 -
Working capital 55,472 96,671 23,316 48,529 32,089
Total assets 334,182 254,947 134,545 143,215 124,171
Long-term debt, non-current - 9,000 9,000 15,000 -
Deferred income taxes 18,090 13,729 6,144 8,365 5,376
Shareholders' equity 295,742 221,733 107,572 112,731 106,417
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Statement of Financial Standards 128 introduces the concept of basic
earnings per share which represents net income divided by the weighted
average common shares outstanding without the dilutive effects of
common stock equivalents (options, warrants, etc.). Diluted earnings
per share include the effects of common stock equivalents.
13
<PAGE> 16
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Demand for offshore drilling services is primarily driven by the
economics of oil and gas exploration, development and production, which, in
turn, are closely linked to current and projected oil and gas prices. Since
the mid-1980's, oil and gas prices have been volatile and generally lower than
prices experienced during the early 1980's, resulting in volatile and, until
recently, generally reduced demand for offshore drilling services. In
addition, during the early 1980's, the industry built a substantial number of
new offshore drilling rigs. The oversupply of rigs and lower oil and gas prices
caused decreased demand and utilization resulting in significantly lower day
rates. Since 1993 activity in the contract drilling industry has improved due
to increased worldwide demand stemming from higher levels of pricing for oil
and natural gas. The supply of offshore drilling rigs has declined while the
demand for such rigs has increased resulting in higher day rates and worldwide
utilization rates. During 1996, both jack-up and deep water drilling markets
showed substantial improvement that continued throughout most of 1997.
However, oil prices have declined substantially since October 1997 and no
assurance can be given that such improved drilling market conditions will be
sustained in the future.
According to Offshore Data Services, as of March 24, 1998, worldwide
jack-up utilization was 89% (338 rigs working out of a supply of 380 rigs)
compared to 89%, 86% and 78% average utilization experienced during 1997, 1996
and 1995, respectively. Worldwide semi-submersible rig utilization as of March
24, 1998 was 79% (118 rigs working out of a supply of 150 rigs) compared to
81%, 79% and 70% average utilization during 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating results are primarily a function of day rates and
utilization. The number of rigs the Company has available for service and the
demand for contract drilling services by energy companies affect the
utilization rates and day rates of the Company's active rigs. Operating costs
include all direct costs and expenditures associated with operating the
Company's rigs. These costs include rig labor, repair, maintenance and supply
expenditures, insurance costs, mobilization costs and other costs related to
operations. Operating expenses do not necessarily fluctuate in proportion to
changes in operating revenues due to the continuation of personnel on board and
equipment maintenance when the rigs are stacked. Labor costs increase
primarily due to higher salary levels, rig staffing requirements and inflation.
Equipment maintenance expenses fluctuate depending upon the type of activity
the rig is performing and the age and condition of the equipment. Inflation is
another contributing factor in the fluctuation of operating expenses.
The changes in operating income are more directly affected by revenue
factors than expense factors. Changes in day rates directly impact revenues
but not expenses. Utilization rate changes have a significant impact on
revenues, but in the short-term do not impact expenses. Over a long period
significant changes in utilization may cause the Company to adjust the level of
its actively marketed rig fleet and labor force to match anticipated levels of
demand, thus changing the level of operating expenses. General and
administrative expenses do not vary significantly unless the Company materially
expands its asset base. Depreciation, which is affected by the Company's level
of capital expenditures and depreciation practices is another major determinant
of operating income, and is not affected by changes in day rates or
utilization.
14
<PAGE> 17
The following table sets forth the average rig utilization rates,
operating days, average day rates, revenues and operating expenses of the
Company by operating segments for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands
except per day data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Jack-ups:
Operating days 4,739 4,532 3,270
Utilization (1) 100% 99% 89%
Average revenue per day $36,324 $24,343 $19,289
Revenue 172,143 110,329 63,067
Contract drilling expense(2) 67,607 59,437 55,091
Depreciation 11,260 9,912 8,529
Operating income 93,276 40,980 (553)
Semi-submersibles: (3)
Operating days 294 - -
Utilization (1) 93% - -
Average revenue per day $61,714 $ - $ -
Revenue 18,114 - -
Contract drilling expense(2) 10,240 333 -
Depreciation 3,242 - -
Operating income 4,632 (333) -
Total Company:
Operating days 5,033 4,532 3,270
Utilization (1) 99% 99% 89%
Average revenue per day $37,805 $24,343 $ 19,289
Revenue 190,257 110,329 63,067
Contract drilling expense(2) 77,847 59,770 55,091
Depreciation 16,995 11,576 9,377
General and administrative expense 7,807 7,498 5,460
Operating income 87,608 31,485 (6,861)
</TABLE>
(1) Based on the number of actively marketed rigs. Excluding rigs under
construction or in the process of substantial upgrading, the Company had an
average of 1.1, 0.9, and 3.0 non-marketed rigs during 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
(2) Excludes depreciation and amortization and general and administrative
expenses.
(3) The Company did not operate any semi-submersibles prior to 1997.
Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996
Revenues. The Company's 1997 drilling revenues increased $79,928,000
or 72%, compared to 1996. Revenue increases from jack-up drilling operations
accounted for $61,814,000 of the increase. This increase was mainly
attributable to increased day rates and slightly better utilization in 1997
compared to 1996 and the activation of the Marine 305 during August 1997 in
Southeast Asia that contributed $9,413,000 to the increase. The remaining
$18,114,000 increase in revenues was from placing the Marine 500, the Company's
first semi-submersible, into service the beginning of 1997.
15
<PAGE> 18
Costs and Expenses. Contract drilling expenses in 1997 increased
$18,077,000 or 30% compared to contract drilling expenses in 1996. Of the
$18,077,000 increase, $8,170,000 can be attributed to jack-up drilling
operations. The addition of the Marine 305 was responsible for $4,052,000 of
the increase. Labor costs due to higher salaries and additional personnel
along with increased maintenance costs partially offset by decreases in
employer's liability accounted for the remaining $4,118,000 attributed to
jack-up operations. The remaining increase in operating costs of $9,907,000 is
due to the operation of the Company's semi-submersible rig the Marine 500 which
began operating during the first quarter of 1997.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense
for 1997 increased $5,419,000 (47%) from $11,576,000 to $16,995,000 compared to
the same period in 1996. The increase was due to depreciation associated with
expenditures for the following items - (i) the acquisition of the MARINE 500,
(ii) acquisition of the MARINE 305, (iii) upgrades to the MARINE 15 and the
MARINE 300; and (iv) acquisitions of drill string and other drilling equipment;
and amortization expense related (i) to deferred financing costs related to the
Company's $100 million credit facility and (ii) the accelerated recognition of
the deferred financing costs associated with the prepayment of the Company's
old $35 million credit facility.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses in
1997 increased $309,000 or 4% from $7,498,000 in 1996 to $7,807,000 compared to
1997. The increase was attributed to an increase in professional services and
other administrative expenses.
Interest Expense. Interest expense in 1997 was $575,000. The Company
had interest expense of $895,000 during 1996. The decrease was primarily the
result of the prepayment and termination of the Company's old $35 million
credit facility in February 1997.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $1,137,000 or 90% from
$1,261,000 in 1996 to $2,398,000 in 1997. The increase was related primarily
to increased cash balances throughout the year, and to a lesser extent, higher
interest rates.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense increased for 1997 as compared to
the same period in 1996, primarily due to an increase in the Company's pretax
income.
Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
Revenues. The Company's 1996 drilling revenues increased $47,262,000
or 75%, compared to 1995 drilling revenues. The entire increase was related to
jack-up drilling operations. The Company did not acquire its first semi-
submersible until late 1996 and was not placed into service until 1997. The
increase in revenues was the result of three factors: (i) a 26% increase in
average day rates from $19,289 in 1995 to $24,343 in 1996, (ii) an increase in
the number of marketed rigs from 10 in 1995 to 13 in 1996 and (iii) an increase
in utilization of marketed rigs from 89% in 1995 to 99% in 1996.
Costs and Expenses. Contract drilling expenses in 1996 increased
$4,679,000 or 8% compared to contract drilling expenses in 1995. The majority
of the increase, $4,346,000 was attributed to jack-up drilling operations. The
increase was primarily the result of an increase in the number of working rigs
from 9 in 1995 to 12 in 1996. Labor expense increased by $4,780,000 (18%) and
was partially offset by decreases in other operating costs and decreases in
employer's liability claims. The remaining increase was due to the purchase of
the Company's first semi-submersible in December 1996.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense
increased $2,199,000 or 23% from $9,377,000 in 1995 to $11,576,000 in 1996. The
increase resulted primarily from the addition of top drives and equipment
upgrades on the MARINE 15, MARINE 16 and MARINE 300, upgrades to the MARINE
201, purchases of drill string and other capital expenditures.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses in
1996 increased $2,038,000 or 37% from $5,460,000 in 1995 to $7,498,000 compared
to 1996. The increase was attributed to an increase in labor due to additional
personnel, an increase in professional services and other administrative
expenses.
16
<PAGE> 19
Interest Expense. Interest expense in 1996 was $895,000 and consisted
of the following: (i) interest of $898,000 based on an average interest rate
of 7.98% on an average borrowed balance of approximately $11,254,000, (ii)
credit facility fees of $58,000, net of (iii) capitalized interest of
approximately $61,000. The Company had interest expense of $855,000 during
1995.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased $233,000 or 16% from
$1,494,000 in 1995 to $1,261,000 in 1996. The decrease was related primarily
to decreased cash balances and slightly lower interest rates during 1996.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense of $11,586,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1996 consisted of (i) current U.S. federal alternative minimum tax
of $343,000, (ii) current foreign taxes of $296,000, (iii) the effect of tax
benefits related to common stock issued pursuant to the Marine Drilling 1992
Long-Term Incentive Plan of $2,528,000, (iv) the realization of
pre-quasi-reorganization net operating loss carryforwards of $834,000 and (v)
deferred U.S. federal income taxes of $7,585,000.
FINANCIAL CONDITION -- LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity. At December 31, 1997, the Company had working capital of
$55,472,000 as compared to working capital of $96,773,000 at December 31, 1996.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 1997
increased by $33,305,000 to $72,585,000 compared to $39,280,000 for the prior
year. The increase was attributed to improved results of operations. Cash used
in investing activities increased $54,583,000 in 1997 to $115,317,000 from
$60,734,000 in 1996 due primarily to $73,490,000 of capital expenditures and
the acquisition of Marine Drilling Companies (Norway) ASA formerly known as
Deep Sea ASA for $52,531,000 in 1997. This increase was partially offset by
$29,967,000 proceeds from maturing short-term investments. Net cash used in
financing activities during 1997 was $11,410,000 consisting of the debt
prepayments and an increase in restricted cash offset by proceeds from the
exercise of common stock options.
In March 1997, the Company entered into a credit agreement, the
"Credit Facility" with Bankers Trust Company ("BTCo"), Christiania Bank og
Kreditkasse ("CBK"), and certain other banks providing financing up to
$100,000,000 to be used for rig acquisitions and upgrades. This agreement
includes a revolving credit facility available through December 31, 1999 that
can be converted into a four-year term loan. Interest and facility fees are
generally payable quarterly during the terms of both facilities. Principal
during the term loan facility is payable quarterly in equal installments
beginning March 31, 2000. Interest accrues at (i) LIBOR plus a margin of .75%
to 1.25% or (ii) prime plus a margin of 0% to .50%, with margins determined
pursuant to a debt to capital calculation. The borrowings are secured by all
of the Company's current rig fleet, except for the Marine 700, as well as
certain other collateral assignments. The Company has no borrowings
outstanding under this agreement at December 31, 1997. The Credit Facility
restricts the payment of dividends by the Company. In connection with the
consummation of the Credit Facility, the Company repaid and terminated its
prior $35,000,000 credit facility with a U.S. financial institution.
During 1997, the improvement in the offshore drilling market allowed
the Company to place some of its offshore rigs under term contracts ranging
from one to five years in duration. In January 1997, the Marine 305 was
contracted to operate in Southeast Asia for one year and is expected to
generate revenues of approximately $28 million beginning August 1997. A
three-year contract for the Marine 500 was signed in July 1997 and is expected
to produce total revenues of $164 million to $188 million beginning the first
quarter of 1999. In December 1997, the Company entered into a nine- month
contract for the Marine 510 that is expected to commence mid-April 1998 and
generate revenues of $23 million. The Marine 510 is being chartered from
Shanghai Bureau of Marine Geological Survey for a period of five years.
Charter fees are payable only when the rig is under contract. In January 1998,
the Marine 700 obtained a three-year contract that is scheduled to begin the
first quarter of 1999 and generate revenues of approximately $207 million,
unless the customer elects, prior to July 1, 1998, to extend the contract to a
five year term in which event the contract would be expected to generate
aggregate day rate revenues of approximately $302 million over the five year
term.
17
<PAGE> 20
Capital Resources. During 1997 the Company expended $73,490,000 in
capital expenditures consisting of disbursements for (i) the upgrade and
refurbishment of the MARINE 305, (ii) refurbishments to the MARINE 500 and
(iii) purchase of drill pipe and other rig machinery. The Company also
acquired 96.2% of the shares of Marine Drilling Companies (Norway) ASA,
formerly Deep Sea ASA, a Norwegian company for $52,531,000.
The Company expects to spend approximately $292,000,000 in 1998 for
capital expenditures, consisting primarily of expenditures of $257,000,000 to
upgrade and complete the Marine 500 and Marine 700. The MARINE 500 will be
upgraded to work in water depths up to 5,000 feet. The rig is expected to be
taken out of service in mid-1998 for four to six months to complete the
upgrades, which are projected to cost approximately $100,000,000. Of the
$100,000,000, shipyard costs are estimated to be $38,000,000. In December
1997, the Company signed a contract with Jurong Shipyard Limited in Singapore
to perform the upgrade. The MARINE 700 will require additional expenditures to
complete its construction and equip it for service. The Company's preliminary
analysis indicates that these additional expenditures will be approximately
$186,000,000, which includes an $87,000,000 shipyard contract and $75,000,000
of equipment, the majority of which will be incurred during 1998. Construction
will take place in Pascagoula, Mississippi at HAM Marine, Inc. shipyard and
should be completed during the first quarter of 1999.
The Company will continue to pursue acquisitions of additional
drilling rigs and related equipment and/or businesses. Future acquisitions, if
any, would likely be funded from the Company's working capital, the Credit
Facility or through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities. The Company
cannot predict whether it will be successful in acquiring additional rigs, and
obtaining financing therefor, on acceptable terms. In addition, it is
currently anticipated that the Company will continue the upgrading of rigs to
enhance their capability to obtain longer-term contracts. The timing and
actual amounts expended by the Company in connection with its plans to upgrade
and refurbish selected rigs, as well as the type of rig modification comprising
each program, is subject to the discretion of the Company and will depend on
the Company's view of market conditions, the Company's cash flow, whether other
acquisitions are made, and other factors.
With regard to fleet expansion, the Company believes that segments of
the offshore drilling market are continuing to undergo consolidation and such
consolidation may present acquisition opportunities. The Company will continue
to explore acquisition opportunities, including opportunities in the deep water
drilling sector, but there can be no assurance as to the timing of any such
acquisitions or that any acquisitions will be made.
The Company anticipates that its available funds, together with cash
generated from operations and amounts that may be borrowed under the Credit
Facility and other potential funding sources, such as increased credit
facilities or private or public debt offerings, will be sufficient to fund its
required capital expenditures, working capital and debt service requirements
for the foreseeable future. Future cash flows, however, are subject to a
number of uncertainties, especially the condition of the oil and gas industry.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that these resources will be sufficient
to fund the Company's cash requirements. In particular, the potential sources
of funding (i) to complete and equip the MARINE 700 for operations and (ii) to
upgrade the MARINE 500 may not be available at the time or in sufficient
amounts to allow the Company to successfully complete these projects.
18
<PAGE> 21
YEAR 2000 ISSUE
Currently, the Company utilizes third party software in all of its
computer applications. The Company's information systems personnel are
currently working with the third party vendors to resolve the potential
problems associated with the year 2000 and the processing of date sensitive
information by the Company's computer and other systems. Based on a recent
assessment, the Company has determined that it will be required to replace
portions of its accounting software so that its computer systems will function
properly with respect to dates in the year 2000 and thereafter. With
modifications to existing software and conversions to new software the Year
2000 issue is not expected to pose significant operational problems for the
Company's computer systems. However, if such modifications or conversions are
not made or are not completed timely, the Year 2000 issue could have a material
adverse impact on operations of the Company. The Company believes that it will
be able to implement successfully the changes necessary to address the Year
2000 issues with reliance on its third party vendors and does not expect the
cost of such changes to have a material impact on the Company's financial
position, results of operations or cash flows in future periods.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income" ("SFAS 130"), which establishes standards for reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components. The components of comprehensive
income refer to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that are excluded from net
income under current accounting standards, including unrecognized foreign
currency translation items, minimum pension liability adjustments and
unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt and equity
securities. SFAS 130 requires that all items that are recognized under
accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a
financial statement displayed in equal prominence with the other financial
statements; the total of other comprehensive income for a period is required to
be transferred to a component of equity that is separately displayed in a
statement of financial position at the end of an accounting period. SFAS 130
is effective for both interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
1997, at which time the Company will adopt the provisions. The Company does
not expect SFAS 130 to have a material effect on reported results.
In June 1997, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information' ("SFAS 131"). SFAS 131 establishes standards for the way public
enterprises are to report information about operating segments in annual
financial statements and requires the reporting of selected information about
operating segments in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. It
also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services,
geographic areas, and major customers. SFAS 131 is effective for periods
beginning after December 15, 1997, at which time the Company will adopt the
provisions. The Company does not expect SFAS 131 to have a material effect on
its reported results.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-K, particularly the section entitled "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations",
contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are not historical facts concerning,
among other things, market conditions, the demand for offshore drilling
services, future acquisitions and fleet expansion, future financings, future
rig contracts, future capital expenditures including rig construction, upgrades
and refurbishments, and future results of operations. Actual results may
differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements, and no
assurance can be given that the Company's expectations will be realized or
achieved. Important factors and risks that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those referred to in the forward-looking statements
include (i) a prolonged period of low oil or gas prices; (ii) the inadequacy of
insurance and indemnification to protect the Company against liability from all
consequences of well disasters, fire damage or environmental damage; (iii) the
inability of the Company to obtain insurance at reasonable rates; (iv) a
decrease in the demand for offshore drilling rigs especially in the U.S. Gulf
of Mexico
19
<PAGE> 22
or for slot jack-up rigs; (v) the risks attendant with operations in foreign
countries including actions that may be taken by foreign countries and actions
that may be taken by the United States against foreign countries; (vi) the
failure of the Company to successfully compete with the Company's competitors
that are larger and have a greater diversity of rigs and greater financial
resources than the Company; (vii) a decrease in rig utilization resulting from
reactivation of currently inactive non-marketed rigs or new construction of
rigs; (viii) the risks of delay and cost overruns attendant to large
construction projects such as the upgrade and refurbishment of certain of the
Company's rigs, including shortages of material or skilled labor, engineering
problems, latent defects or damage to current equipment, work stoppages,
weather interference and inability to obtain requisite permits or approvals;
(ix) the return of market and other conditions similar to those in which the
Company incurred net losses before extraordinary items for each of the years
ended December 31, 1991, 1992 and 1995; (x) the loss of key management
personnel or the inability of the Company to attract and retain sufficient
qualified personnel to operate its rigs; (xi) the risk that labor shortages
could result in material wage increases; (xii) the adoption of additional laws
or regulations that limit or reduce drilling opportunities or that increase the
cost of drilling or increase the potential liability of the Company; (xiii) the
occurrence of risks attendant to contract drilling operations including
blowouts, cratering, fires and explosions, capsizing, grounding or collision
involving rigs while in operation, mobilization or otherwise or damage to rigs
from weather, sea conditions or unsound location; (xiv) adverse uninsured
litigation results; and (xv) adverse tax consequences with respect to
operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this
Report. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to
release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement
contained herein to reflect any change in the Company's expectations with
regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which
any statement is based.
20
<PAGE> 23
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.:
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Marine Drilling
Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Houston, Texas
January 20, 1998
21
<PAGE> 24
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1997 1996
----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 15,619 $ 69,761
Restricted cash 5,000 2,200
Short-term investments - 9,990
Accounts receivable - trade and other, net 46,680 21,378
Prepaid expenses and other 4,592 1,461
Inventory 456 897
-------- --------
Total current assets 72,347 105,687
Property and Equipment 310,122 182,200
Less accumulated depreciation 49,635 33,463
-------- --------
Property and equipment, net 260,487 148,737
Other 1,348 523
-------- --------
$334,182 $254,947
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt $ - $ 1,000
Accounts payable 6,367 3,249
Accrued expenses 7,824 4,182
Current tax liability 2,113 -
Employer's liability claims, current 571 483
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 16,875 8,914
Long-term debt - 9,000
Employer's liability claims, non-current and other 1,776 1,571
Deferred income taxes 18,090 13,729
Minority interest in subsidiary 1,699 -
Shareholders' Equity:
Common stock, par value $.01. Authorized 200,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 51,890,444 and 51,262,519 shares as of
December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996, respectively 519 513
Common stock restricted (1,249) (628)
Additional paid-in capital 201,236 184,992
Retained earnings from January 1, 1993 95,236 36,856
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity 295,742 221,733
-------- --------
Commitments and contingencies - -
-------- --------
$334,182 $254,947
======== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
22
<PAGE> 25
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $190,257 $110,329 $ 63,067
Costs and Expenses:
Contract drilling 77,847 59,770 55,091
Depreciation and amortization 16,995 11,576 9,377
General and administrative 7,807 7,498 5,460
-------- -------- -------
102,649 78,844 69,928
-------- -------- -------
Operating income (loss) 87,608 31,485 (6,861)
-------- -------- -------
Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense (575) (895) (855)
Interest income 2,398 1,261 1,494
Other income 405 405 120
-------- -------- -------
2,228 771 759
-------- -------- -------
Income (loss) before income taxes 89,836 32,256 (6,102)
Income tax expense (benefit) 31,456 11,586 (2,080)
-------- -------- -------
Net income (loss) $ 58,380 $ 20,670 $(4,022)
======== ======== =======
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic $ 1.13 $ 0.46 $ (0.09)
Diluted $ 1.11 $ 0.45 $ (0.09)
Average common shares:
Basic 51,572 44,918 43,812
Diluted 52,452 45,748 43,812
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statement.
23
<PAGE> 26
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK
-------------------------------------------
ISSUED IN TREASURY ADDITIONAL
--------------------- ------------------- PAID-IN RESTRICTED RETAINED
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL STOCK EARNINGS
---------- --------- --------- -------- ------------ ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at December 31, 1994 43,917,766 $ 439 - $ - $ 92,143 $ (804) $ 20,953
Net loss - - - - - - (4,022)
Purchases of stock - - 735,633 (2,659) - - -
Issuance of restricted common
stock 53,500 1 - - 147 (148) -
Accrual of compensation expense - - - - - 333 -
Forfeitures of restricted common
stock (20,000) - - - (114) 114 -
Common stock options exercised 130,000 1 (20,000) 61 125 - -
Issuance of common stock for
401(k) plan 88,377 1 (166,528) 531 325 - -
Tax benefits related to common
stock issued pursuant to long
term incentive plan - - - - 85 - -
Issuance of stock for Non-
Employee Directors' Plan - - (14,895) 51 9 - -
---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- --------- -----------
Balances at December 31, 1995 44,169,643 442 534,210 (2,016) 92,720 (505) 16,931
Net income - - - - - - 20,670
Issuance of stock for stock offering 5,584,700 56 - - 79,109 - -
Issuance of stock for MARINE 305 882,352 9 - - 7,491 - -
Issuance of restricted common
stock 80,833 1 - - 560 (561) -
Accrual of compensation expense - - - - - 438 -
Common stock options exercised 477,650 4 (484,120) 1,824 907 - (745)
Issuance of common stock for
401(k) plan 62,891 1 (50,090) 192 789 - -
Pre-quasi-reorganization net
operating loss carryforwards - - - - 834 - -
Tax benefits related to common
stock issued pursuant to long
term incentive plan - - - - 2,528 - -
Issuance of stock for Non-
Employee Directors' Plan 4,450 - - - 54 - -
---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- --------- -----------
Balances at December 31, 1996 51,262,519 513 - - 184,992 (628) 36,856
Net income - - - - - - 58,380
Issuance of restricted common
stock 76,500 - - - 1,323 (1,323) -
Accrual of compensation expense - - - - - 590 -
Forfeitures of restricted common
stock (12,000) - - - (112) 112 -
Common stock options exercised 494,333 5 - - 1,370 - -
Issuance of common stock for
401(k) plan 66,277 1 - - 1,285 - -
Pre-quasi-reorganization net
operating loss carryforwards - - - - 8,310 - -
Tax benefits related to common
stock issued pursuant to long
term incentive plan - - - - 3,993 - -
Issuance of stock for Non-
Employee Directors' Plan 2,815 - - - 60 - -
Other - - - - 15 - -
---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- --------- -----------
Balances at December 31, 1997 51,890,444 $ 519 - $ - $ 201,236 $ (1,249) $ 95,236
========== ======== ========= ======= ========= ========= ===========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
<PAGE> 27
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
--------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income (loss) $58,380 $20,670 $(4,022)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Deferred income taxes 4,361 7,585 (2,221)
Pre-quasi-reorganization net operating loss
carryforwards 8,310 834 -
Tax benefits related to common stock issued pursuant to
long-term incentive plan 3,993 2,528 85
Depreciation and amortization 16,995 11,576 9,377
Gain on disposition of equipment (156) (410) (153)
Loss on sale of short-term investments 2 - -
Accrual of compensation expense, net 590 438 333
Issuance of common stock to the employee
retirement plan and the Non-Employee Directors' Plan 1,345 1,036 917
Amortization of interest income (465) (261) (148)
Increase in receivables (25,286) (3,300) (2,725)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses, other and inventory (2,690) 294 (1,516)
Increase (decrease) in payables, accrued
expenses and employer's liability claims 8,384 (1,344) 3,710
Other (1,178) (366) 42
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 72,585 39,280 3,679
------- ------- -------
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchase of short-term investments (19,514) (9,729) (10,465)
Maturity of short-term investments 29,967 - 28,750
Purchase of equipment (73,490) (51,654) (21,418)
Acquisition of company, net of cash acquired (52,531) - -
Proceeds from disposition of equipment 251 649 314
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities (115,317) (60,734) (2,819)
------- ------- -------
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt - 21,500 -
Proceeds from sale of common stock - 79,582 -
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 1,375 1,990 187
Issuance cost of sale of common stock 15 (417) -
Payments of debt (10,000) (21,500) (5,000)
Purchase of treasury stock - - (2,659)
Increase in restricted cash (2,800) (2,200) -
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (11,410) 78,955 (7,472)
------- ------- -------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (54,142) 57,501 (6,612)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 69,761 12,260 18,872
------- ------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $15,619 $69,761 $12,260
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
<PAGE> 28
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - (Continued)
(In thousands, except share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ 620 $ 956 $ 981
Income taxes 11,835 640 55
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of 882,352 shares for MARINE 305 rig acquisition $ - $ 7,500 $ -
Issuance of 76,500, 80,833 and 53,500 shares in 1997, 1996
and 1995 respectively, of restricted common stock 1,323 561 148
Forfeitures of 12,000 and 20,000 shares in 1997 and
1995 respectively, of restricted common stock (112) - (114)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired:
Working capital, other than cash $ 766 $ - $ -
Plant and equipment (54,186) - -
Purchase price in excess of the net assets acquired (828) - -
Minority interest 1,717 - -
-------- ---------- -------
Net cash used for acquisition $(52,531) $ - $ -
======== ========== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
<PAGE> 29
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION
Organization and Business -- The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. ("Parent") and its
subsidiaries, Marine Drilling Management Company ("MDMC"), Marine 300 Series,
Inc. ("M300SI"), Marine Drilling International, Inc. ("MDII") and Marine
Drilling Companies (Norway) ASA ("MDCN ASA"). Unless the context otherwise
requires, the term "Company" refers to Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidated.
The Company is engaged in offshore domestic and international contract
drilling of oil and gas wells. International operations are conducted in India
and Southeast Asia.
Inventory -- Inventory consists of operating supplies primarily for
the Company's international operations and is carried at the lower of cost or
market.
Property and Equipment --Property and equipment are stated at
historical cost or the cost assigned to the assets at December 31, 1992 in
connection with the adoption of quasi-reorganization accounting procedures.
Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated
remaining useful lives of the assets that are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS
--------
<S> <C>
Jack-up rigs (new) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 to 25
Jack-up rigs (used/refurbished) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 to 15
Semi-submersible rigs (new) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Semi-submersible rigs (used) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 to 15
Drill string . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Other equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 to 12
</TABLE>
Major renewals and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over
the respective asset's useful life. Expenditures for normal maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Maintenance and repairs amounted
to $12,066,000 $8,905,000 and $8,219,000 in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
When property or equipment is retired, the related assets and accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and a gain or loss is reflected in
other income (expense). The Company continues to depreciate idle drilling
equipment using the same rates as while operating. The Company capitalizes
interest expense related to certain capital expenditure projects. Capitalized
interest was approximately $49,000, $61,000 and $126,000 for 1997, 1996, and
1995, respectively.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangible assets for impairment whenever events or certain changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated
by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to
be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceed the fair value of the assets.
Employer's Liability Claims -- Employer's liability claims,
principally arising from actual or alleged personal injuries, are estimates of
the Company's liabilities for such occurrences. These claims are classified as
current or long-term based upon the periods in which such claims are expected
to be funded.
Deferred Financing Costs -- Deferred financing costs are amortized
over the life of the related debt. Deferred financing costs, net of
accumulated amortization were $783,000 and $231,000, respectively, at December
31, 1997 and 1996.
27
<PAGE> 30
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Income Taxes -- Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded to
reflect the future tax consequences of differences between the financial
statement and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date.
Revenue Recognition -- Drilling revenues are recorded pursuant to day
rate contracts, under which the Company received a fixed amount per day for
providing drilling services using the rigs it operates. Revenues are
recognized as earned. In connection with drilling contracts, the Company may
receive lump sum fees for mobilization of equipment and personnel or for
capital improvements to rigs. Significant mobilization and reimbursements are
deferred and amortized over the term of the contract. As of December 31, 1997
there was $2,433,000 of unamortized mobilization and reimbursement fees related
to the Marine 305 contract. There were no unamortized mobilization and
reimbursements as of December 31, 1996.
Rig Mobilization Costs -- When significant costs are incurred in
connection with mobilizing a drilling rig for a new contract, the Company
defers and amortizes such costs over the term of the applicable drilling
contract. There were $2,487,000 unamortized mobilization costs at December 31,
1997 and no unamortized mobilization costs as of December 31, 1996.
Mobilization costs incurred in connection with rig purchases are capitalized as
part of the purchase price and are depreciated over the life of the rig.
Stock-Based Compensation -- Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards 123 ("SFAS123"), "Accounting for Stock- Based Compensation,"
encourages, but does not require companies to record compensation costs for
stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen
to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value
method prescribed in Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for
Stock issued to Employees," ("APB 25") and related interpretations.
Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if
any, of the quoted market price of the Company's stock at the date of grant
over the amount the employee must pay to acquire the stock. The disclosures
required by SFAS 123, however, have been included in Note 8.
Cash and Cash Equivalents -- The Company generally considers all
highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 1997, $5,000,000 of the
Company's cash on hand was restricted as a result of cash collateral
requirements related to a credit facility used for issuing letters of credit to
support the Company's international activities. As of December 31, 1997,
letters of credit totaling $2,500,000 were outstanding.
Short-Term Investments -- Short-term investments consist of corporate
debt securities, mortgage-backed securities and corporate paper. The Company
classifies its short-term investments as held-to-maturity securities.
Held-to-maturity securities are those securities in which the Company has the
ability and intent to hold the security until maturity. Held-to-maturity
securities are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or
accretion of premiums or discounts. Premiums and discounts are amortized or
accreted over the life of the related held-to-maturity security as an
adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. Dividend and interest
income are recognized when earned. The fair value of the short-term
investments at December 31, 1997 was $0 compared to $9,990,000 for 1996.
Treasury Stock -- Treasury stock is acquired under the cost method and
valued upon reissuance using the first-in, first-out method. During 1995, the
Company purchased 735,633 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$2,659,000. In addition, during 1995, the Company reissued 201,423 shares at
an aggregate cost of $643,000 for the employee and non-employee benefit plans.
No shares were repurchased during 1996, however, 534,210 shares were reissued
at an aggregate cost of $2,016,000 for the employee and non-employee benefit
plans. At December 31, 1997, the Company had remaining authorization under the
stock purchase program to acquire up to 4,000,000 shares.
28
<PAGE> 31
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Capital Structure -- The Company has one class of common stock, par
value $0.01. The stock is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol
MDCO. There are 200,000,000 authorized shares of which 51,890,444 is issued
and outstanding as of December 31, 1997. Each share of common stock is allowed
one voting right.
Earnings Per Share -- Effective December 1997 the Company was required
to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per
Share" ("SFAS 128"). SFAS 128 introduces the concept of basic earnings per
share, which represents net income divided by the weighted average common
shares outstanding - without the dilutive effects of common stock equivalents
(options, warrants, etc). Basic EPS for the years ended December 31, 1997,
1996 and 1995 is $1.13, $0.46 and $(0.09) respectively. Diluted earnings per
share, giving effect for common stock equivalents, for the years ended December
31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 is $1.11, $0.45 and $(0.09) respectively. Common stock
equivalents with a weighted average of 880,000 and 830,000 are reflected in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 1997
and 1996, respectively. Common stock equivalents with a weighted average of
951,000 common stock equivalents are not considered in the 1995 calculation of
diluted earnings per share due to the net loss recorded during the year. No
adjustment to net income (loss) was made in calculating diluted earnings per
share for 1997, 1996 and 1995.
Reclassification of Accounts -- Certain reclassifications have been
made to the 1996 and 1995 consolidated financial statements to conform with the
current presentation.
Concentrations of Credit Risk -- The market for the Company's services
and products is the offshore oil and gas industry, and the Company's customers
consist primarily of independent and major oil and gas companies. The Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and obtains collateral
security as deemed prudent. The Company has established an adequate allowance
for bad debts, and such losses have historically been within management's
expectations (see Note 11). At December 31, 1997 and 1996, the Company had
cash deposits in one bank. In addition, the Company had mutual funds and
commercial paper with a variety of companies and financial institutions with
strong credit ratings, and such securities are held until maturity. The
Company believes that credit and market risk in such instruments is minimal.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments -- The fair values of the
Company's cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables approximated
their carrying values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
The estimated fair value of long-term debt is equivalent to its carrying value
due to the floating interest rate (see Note 5).
Use of Estimates -- Management of the Company has made a number of
estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities
and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(2) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - TRADE AND OTHER, NET
Accounts receivables are summarized as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996
----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Trade receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 38,613 $ 19,628
Marine 15 fire insurance claim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,175 596
Other receivables 892 1,154
--------- ---------
$ 46,680 $ 21,378
========= =========
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE> 32
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(3) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at historical cost or the cost
assigned to the assets at December 31, 1992 in connection with the adoption of
quasi-reorganization accounting procedures, and are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996
----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Drilling rigs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 209,483 $160,073
Drill string . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,517 6,282
Other equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,377 1,903
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88,745 13,942
--------- --------
$ 310,122 $182,200
========= ========
</TABLE>
Depreciation expense was $16,631,000, $11,530,000 and $9,326,000 for
the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
(4) ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses are summarized as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1997 1996
-------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Accrued payroll and related taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,439 $ 1,482
Accrued health benefit plan claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530 550
Foreign tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 0
Accrued tug charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 773 280
Other accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,237 1,870
-------- ---------
$ 7,824 $ 4,182
======== =========
</TABLE>
(5) LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt is summarized as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------------------
1997 1996
---------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
M300SI note payable to lender due 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ - $10,000
Less:
Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1,000
---------- -------
Long-term debt, non-current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ - $ 9,000
========== =======
</TABLE>
M300SI -- Note payable to Lender -- On December 1, 1994, M200 SII
entered into a $35,000,000 revolving/term loan agreement (the "Loan") with a
U.S. financial institution ("Lender"). This agreement included a revolving
credit facility which was convertible on June 1, 1996 into a term loan. On May
31, 1996, the Loan was amended (i) to extend the revolving loan availability
period by one year to June 1, 1997 at which time it could be converted to a
term loan; (ii) to extend the term facility by two years; and (iii) to lower
the amount of available borrowing during the loan availability period over four
consecutive quarterly reductions of $1,750,000 on September 1, 1996; December
1, 1996; March 1, 1997 and June 1, 1997. The agreement was terminated during
February 1997.
Interest was calculated on the outstanding principal balance at the
London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 2.5%. The interest rate as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995 was 8.0% and 8.3%, respectively. A revolving loan
fee was due quarterly during the revolving loan period based on the unused
credit facility at .25%.
30
<PAGE> 33
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Interest payments on the loan amounted to $322,000, $956,000 and
$981,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, including
revolving loan fees of $7,000, $58,000 and $60,000, respectively. A facility
fee of $175,000 was paid to the Lender during the fourth quarter 1994 and was
being amortized over the life of the loan. During May 1996 a modification fee
of $88,000 was paid to the Lender and was being amortized over the remaining
life of the loan. Upon termination of the agreement a non-utilization fee of
$200,000 was paid.
Parent -- In March 1997, the Company entered into a new credit
agreement, the "Credit Facility," with Bankers Trust Company ("BTCo"),
Christiania Bank og Kreditkasse ("CBK"), and certain other banks providing
financing up to $100,000,000 to be used for rig acquisitions and upgrades.
This agreement includes a revolving credit facility available through December
31, 1999, which can be converted into a four-year term loan. Interest and
facility fees are generally payable quarterly during the terms of both
facilities. Principal during the term loan facility is payable quarterly in
equal installments beginning March 31, 2000. Interest accrues at (i) LIBOR
plus a margin of .75% to 1.25% or (ii) prime plus a margin of 0% to .50%, with
margins determined pursuant to a debt to capital calculation. The agreement is
secured by all of the Company's current rig fleet, except for the Marine 700,
as well as certain other collateral assignments. The Company and its
subsidiaries are required to comply with various covenants, including, but not
limited to, the maintenance of financial ratios related to (i) debt to total
capitalization and (ii) EBITDA to interest expense and dividends.
Interest payments on the Credit Facility for 1997 were $298,000, which
included a commitment fee of $248,000. The commitment fee is due quarterly
during the revolving credit period based on the unused credit facility at .30%.
The Company has no borrowings outstanding under this agreement at December 31,
1997.
(6) INCOME TAXES
Income taxes consist of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
---------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
U.S. federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,197 $ 343 $ -
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 - 1
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,551 296 55
------- ------- -------
14,792 639 56
------- ------- -------
Other:
U.S. federal - deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,361 7,585 (2,221)
Pre-quasi-reorganization net operating loss
carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,310 834 -
Tax benefits related to common stock issued
pursuant to long-term incentive plan . . . . . 3,993 2,528 85
------- ------- -------
16,664 10,947 (2,136)
------- ------- -------
Total tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $31,456 $11,586 $(2,080)
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
As a result of the adoption of quasi-reorganization accounting
procedures on December 31, 1992, the tax effect of the realization of tax
attributes generated prior thereto are recorded directly to shareholders'
equity as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital and are not reflected as
a reduction of income tax expense. The realization of tax attributes prior to
the quasi-reorganization are subject to the rules and guidance of the Internal
Revenue Service and United States Department of the Treasury as interpreted or
applied to situations similar to the Company.
31
<PAGE> 34
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, the effective
tax rates for financial reporting purposes of 35%, 36% and 34% approximates the
U.S. federal statutory rates of 35%, 35% and 34%. The effective rate was
higher than the statutory rate in 1996 due to the Company's treatment of
foreign tax payments.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant
portions of the deterred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December
31, 1997 and 1996 are presented below (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1997 1996
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,087 $ 24,065
Alternative minimum tax carryforward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 688 -
Investment tax, general business and foreign tax
Credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442 4,862
Employer's liability claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 733 683
Allowance for bad debts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 53
------------ --------
Total gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,003 29,663
Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (14,270) (28,980)
------------ --------
Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 733 683
------------ --------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Plant and equipment, principally due to differences
In depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,929 13,344
Deferred expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 766 -
Deferred intercompany gains and losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 1,068
------------ --------
Total gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,823 14,412
------------ --------
Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18,090 $ 13,729
============ ========
</TABLE>
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 1997
and 1996 was $14,270,000 and $28,980,000 respectively. The net change in the
total valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 was a
decrease of $14,710,000 and $7,758,000 respectively. In assessing the
realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax
liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in
making this assessment. Based upon projections for future taxable income over
the periods which the deferred tax assets are deductible and the Section 382
limitation as discussed below, management believes it is more likely than not
that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net
of the existing valuation allowances at December 31, 1997.
At December 31, 1997, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards
for federal income tax purposes of $37,392,000 which if not utilized, expire in
years 2003 and 2010. The Company also had investment tax credit and general
business credit carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately
$442,000 at December 31, 1997 which if not utilized, expire in years 1998 to
2000. In late 1995 and early 1996, certain venture capital firms holding
significant percentages of the Company's common stock sold or distributed their
positions. These transactions triggered an ownership change pursuant to Section
382 in March 1996. As a result of this ownership change, the Company's use of
its net operating loss, investment tax credit and general business credit
carryforwards subsequent to that date will be limited.
32
<PAGE> 35
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(7) BENEFIT PLANS
1992 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN -- In late 1992, the Company adopted the
Marine Drilling 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan ("1992 Plan") which was amended in
1996. Pursuant to the terms of the 1992 Plan, an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares
(subject to the restrictions described herein) of common stock are available for
distribution pursuant to stock options, SARs and restricted stock. The number
of shares of common stock available for distribution is further limited in that
no stock options, SARs or restricted stock may be issued if, immediately after
such issuance, the number of shares subject to outstanding stock options, SARs
and restricted stock awards would exceed 5% of the common stock then
outstanding. The shares of common stock subject to any stock option or SAR that
terminates without a payment being made in the form of common stock would again
become available for distribution pursuant to the 1992 Plan.
Restricted Common Stock. During 1997, 1996 and 1995, the Company issued
restricted stock grants consisting of 76,500, 80,833 and 53,500 shares,
respectively, of common stock. These grants generally lapse over four-year
periods and the values of the grants are based on the respective closing prices
on the day preceding each grant and are recognized as compensation expense over
the periods during which the restrictions lapse. Compensation expense related
to the issuance of restricted common stock for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995 was $590,000, $438,000 and $333,000, respectively.
During 1997 and 1995, 12,000 and 20,000 shares, respectively, of
restricted common stock were forfeited
Common Stock Options. The exercise price of each option equals the
market price of the Company's stock on the date of grant. An option's maximum
term is ten years. The vesting period ranges from immediately to four years.
This period is determined at the issuance of each grant. The following table
summarizes stock option transactions pursuant to the 1992 Plan:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE
FIXED OPTIONS SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
----------------------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at
Beginning of year 1,721,380 $ 5.63 1,880,650 $ 2.08 1,575,650 $ 1.97
Granted 117,500 16.38 802,500 9.68 530,000 2.50
Exercised (489,333) 2.77 (961,770) 2.07 (150,000) 1.25
Forfeited (50,000) 2.50 - (75,000) 4.25
--------- --------- ---------
Outstanding at year end 1,299,547 7.80 1,721,380 $ 5.63 1,880,650 $ 2.08
========= ========= =========
Options exercisable at
year-end 473,714 573,880 888,150
Weighted-average fair
value of options
granted during
the year $9.55 $5.74 $1.59
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE> 36
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about fixed-price stock
options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
WEIGHTED-AVG.
NUMBER REMAINING NUMBER
OUTSTANDING CONTRACTUAL WEIGHTED-AVG. EXERCISABLE WEIGHTED-AVG.
EXERCISE PRICES AT 12/31/97 LIFE EXERCISE PRICE AT 12/31/97 EXERCISE PRICE
- ---------------- ----------- ------------ -------------- ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 1.25 167,880 4.8 $ 1.25 167,880 $ 1.25
6.00 47,500 5.5 6.00 47,500 6.00
2.50 222,500 7.2 2.50 32,500 2.50
8.94 500,000 8.5 8.94 166,667 8.94
10.38 66,667 8.5 10.38 - 10.38
8.94 37,500 8.7 8.94 12,500 8.94
8.94 15,000 8.7 8.94 5,000 8.94
12.25 125,000 8.8 12.25 41,667 12.25
16.50 60,000 9.1 16.50 - -
16.25 57,500 9.3 16.25 - -
---------- --------
$1.25 to 16.50 1,299,547 7.8 $ 7.80 473,714 $ 5.77
========== ========
</TABLE>
Based upon Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
and shares reserved for issuance as set forth above, the number of shares then
available for future stock options, SARs and restricted stock grants was
7,537,284 and 8,096,117 shares, respectively. The number of shares available
due to the 5% limitation was 1,273,730 and 762,943 shares, respectively.
No compensation costs were recognized in income for 1997, 1996 and
1995 because the Company has elected to continue accounting for such
transactions under APB 25.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' PLAN-- The Company adopted the 1995
Non-Employee Directors' Plan (the "Directors' Plan") effective June 29, 1995.
The Directors' Plan provides for the grant of shares and options to acquire
common stock to each director who is not an employee of the Company. A maximum
of 350,000 shares may be issued pursuant to stock awards or options. Each
option granted will vest and become exercisable one year after its grant and
will expire ten years from the date the option is granted. The exercise price
of each option equals the market price of the Company's stock on the date of
grant. No compensation costs were recognized in income.
34
<PAGE> 37
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table summarizes stock option transactions under the
Director's Plan as of December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE
FIXED OPTIONS SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
- ----------------------- -------- --------- -------- --------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at
Beginning of year 60,000 $ 4.94 50,000 $ 4.00 - $ -
Granted 12,500 15.63 10,000 9.63 50,000 4.00
Exercised (5,000) 4.00 - - - -
Forfeited - - - - - -
------- ------ ------
Outstanding at year end 67,500 $ 6.99 60,000 $ 4.94 50,000 $ 4.00
======= ======= ======
Options exercisable at
year-end 55,000 50,000 -
Weighted-average fair
value of options
granted during
the year $ 9.08 $ 5.79 $ 2.50
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about fixed-price stock
options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 1997 under the Director's
Plan.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
NUMBER WEIGHTED-AVG. NUMBER
OUTSTANDING REMAINING WEIGHTED-AVG. EXERCISABLE WEIGHTED-AVG.
EXERCISE PRICES AT 12/31/97 CONTRACTUAL LIFE EXERCISE PRICE AT 12/31/97 EXERCISE PRICE
- --------------- ----------- ---------------- -------------- ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 4.00 45,000 7.5 $ 4.00 45,000 $ 4.00
9.63 10,000 8.4 9.63 10,000 9.63
15.63 12,500 9.4 15.63 - -
----------- ------------
$4.00 to 15.63 67,500 7.9 $ 6.99 55,000 $ 5.02
=========== ============
</TABLE>
During 1997 and 1996, 2,815 and 4,450 shares were issued as stock
awards and related compensation expense of $151,000 and $132,000 was recognized
in 1997 and 1996, respectively.
EMPLOYEE 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN -- The Company has a 401(k) Profit
Sharing Plan (the "401(k) Plan") covering substantially all of its employees
who have been employed at least three months. The Company matches employees'
contributions to the Plan on a dollar-for-dollar basis, in the form of Company
common stock, up to 5% of their eligible compensation. During 1997, 1996 and
1995, the Company made matching contributions with the Company's common stock
totaling $1,303,000, $1,014,000 and $843,000, respectively.
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN -- The Company adopted the
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Executive Plan") effective December
31, 1994. Employees who participate in the Executive Plan are selected by an
Administrative Committee. Under the Executive Plan, the participating
executives may elect (i) to defer up to 80% of compensation after reaching the
limitations applicable to the Company's 401(k) Plan and (ii) to defer any
excess contributions refunded by the 401(k) Plan. The Company matches
executives' contributions to the Executive Plan on a dollar-for-dollar basis,
in cash up to 5% of their eligible compensation. As of December 31, 1997, and
1996 the amount deferred under the Executive Plan was $252,000 and $102,000,
respectively.
35
<PAGE> 38
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(8) ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation cost
has been recognized for its fixed stock option plans. If the Company had
elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the options
at the grant date as prescribed by SFAS 123, net income (loss) and net income
(loss) per share would approximate the pro forma amounts indicated below (in
thousands except per share data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income (loss) - as reported ........................... $58,380 $20,670 $(4,022)
Net income (loss) - pro forma ............................. 56,988 19,497 (4,240)
Net income (loss) per share - as reported ................. 1.13 0.46 (0.09)
Net income (loss) per share - pro forma ................... 1.11 0.43 (0.10)
</TABLE>
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected dividend yield .................................. - - -
Expected price volatility ................................ 63.2% 63.8% 71.2%
Risk-free interest rate .................................. 5.4% 6.2% 6.0%
Expected life of option .................................. 5 years 5 years 5 years
</TABLE>
The effects of applying SFAS 123 in the pro forma disclosure are not
indicative of future amounts. SFAS 123 does not apply to awards prior to 1995,
and additional awards in future years were not anticipated in the calculations.
(9) SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS PLAN
The Company adopted a shareholder rights plan on November 8, 1996,
designed to assure that the Company's shareholders receive fair and equal
treatment in the event of any proposed takeover of the Company and to guard
against partial tender offers and other abusive takeover tactics to gain
control of the Company without paying all shareholders a fair price. The
rights plan was not adopted in response to any specific takeover proposal.
Under the rights plan, the Company issued one preferred share purchase right (a
"Right") with respect to each outstanding share of Common Stock outstanding on
November 20, 1996. Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from
the Company one one-thousandth of a share of Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, $.01 par value per share (the "Preferred Shares"), of the Company at a
price of $56.00 per one one-thousandth of a Preferred Share, subject to
adjustment. The Rights are not currently exercisable and will become
exercisable only in the event a person or group acquires beneficial ownership
of 15% or more of the Company's Common Stock. Each whole Preferred Share will
be entitled to receive a quarterly preferential dividend in an amount per share
equal to the greater of (i) $1.00 in cash or (ii) in the aggregate, 1,000 times
the dividend declared on the Common Stock. In the event of liquidation, the
holders of the Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive a preferential
liquidation payment equal to the greater of (i) $1,000 per share or (ii) in the
aggregate, 1,000 times the payment made on the shares of Common Stock. In the
event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which shares of
Common Stock are exchanged for or changed into other stock or securities, cash
or other property, each whole Preferred Share will be entitled to receive 1,000
times the amount received per share of Common Stock. Each whole Preferred
Share shall be entitled to 1,000 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of
the shareholders of the Company, and Preferred Shares shall generally vote
together as one class with the Common Stock and any other capital stock on all
matters submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Company. The Rights will
expire on November 19, 2006 (the "Final Expiration Date"), unless the Final
Expiration Date is extended or the Rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by
the Company.
36
<PAGE> 39
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(10) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
India Lawsuit -- Jagson International Limited, an Indian entity, has
brought suit against Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and Marine 300 Series,
Inc. in Bombay, India. The plaintiff has alleged that the Company agreed to
charter two jack-up rigs to the plaintiff during 1992 and that it breached the
agreement by failing to charter the rigs resulting in damages in excess of
$14,500,000. The Company disputes the existence of the agreement and intends
to vigorously defend the suit. Although the lawsuit has recently been filed
and the litigation is in an early stage, based on a number of substantive and
procedural defenses that the Company believes are available to it, the Company
does not believe the ultimate resolution of this dispute will have a material
adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
Legal Proceedings -- The Company is involved in various other claims
and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion
of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
Operating Leases -- The Company rents certain equipment and other
property under operating leases. Rental expense was $1,836,000, $2,208,000 and
$2,066,000 in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Aggregate future minimum
rental payments relating to operating leases not including the charter fee for
the MARINE 510, are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Office and equipment leases . . . . . . . . $627 $433 $311 $299 $296
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
Shipyard Contracts -- In December 1997 Marine Drilling Companies
(Norway) ASA ("Owner") entered into an agreement with HAM Marine, Inc.
("Builder") to complete the Marine 700. The shipyard contract is for
$87,000,000 and the project is expected to be completed during February 1999.
Payments are to be made monthly based upon the percentage complete. If the
construction is not complete by the scheduled delivery date per the contract,
the Builder shall pay the Owner $100,000 for every day late not to exceed
$6,000,000. Likewise, if delivery of the completed rig is early, then the
Owner shall pay the Builder $100,000 per day up to $6,000,000. The shipyard is
located in Pascagoula, Mississippi.
On December 19, 1997 the Company signed a contract with Jurong
Shipyard Limited ("Builder") in Singapore to upgrade the Marine 500. The
contract is for approximately $38,000,000 and is expected to take approximately
six months. As in all construction projects there can be no guarantee that
delays will not prevent the upgrade from being completed on schedule. The
contract makes provisions for such delays. If the rig does not arrive at the
shipyard on schedule then the Company shall pay the Builder $5,000 per day for
a maximum period of thirty days. Once the upgrade begins if it is completed
early then the Builder will receive $30,000 per day for each day ahead of
schedule up to $2,000,000. On the other hand, if the work is delayed beyond
the scheduled completion date due to events that are within the control of the
Builder then the Company shall be paid $60,000 per day for each day late up to
a maximum of $4,000,000.
Charter Agreement -- The Company entered into a Charter Agreement with
Shanghai Bureau of Marine Geological Survey to charter the Marine 510, a
semi-submersible, for a period of five years. The Charter Agreement begins
when the rig commences operations under a drilling contract that is expected to
be mid-April 1998. The charter and related fees, which average $29,500 per
day, are only payable during the time the rig is earning a daily rate. The
charter rate goes to zero when the rig is not employed. In the first two years
the Agreement cannot be terminated. In years three through five the agreement
can only be terminated in the event the rig does not have a contract within 50
days of a completed contract with at least 10 days written notice prior to
termination.
37
<PAGE> 40
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(11) SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION
For segment reporting purposes the Company defines its segments as
shallow water drilling (jack-up rigs) and deepwater drilling
(semi-submersibles). Operating income consists of revenues less the related
operating costs and expenses, including depreciation and allocated operation
support, excluding interest and unallocated corporate expenses. Identifiable
assets by operating segment include assets directly identified with those
operations.
The following table sets forth consolidated financial information with
respect to the Company and its subsidiaries by operating segment (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JACK-UP SEMI CORPORATE &
OPERATIONS OPERATIONS OTHER TOTAL
------------- ---------- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1997
Revenues $ 172,143 $18,114 $ - $ 190,257
Operating Income (Loss) 93,276 4,632 (10,300) 87,608
Identifiable Assets 179,584 123,280 31,318 334,182
Capital Expenditures 39,574 84,366 3,736 127,676
Depreciation & Amortization 11,260 3,242 2,493 16,995
1996
Revenues $ 110,329 $ - $ - $ 110,329
Operating Income (Loss) 40,980 (333) (9,162) 31,485
Identifiable Assets 126,810 38,092 90,045 254,947
Capital Expenditures 17,967 38,062 3,125 59,154
Depreciation & Amortization 9,912 - 1,664 11,576
1995
Revenues $ 63,067 $ - $ - $ 63,067
Operating Income (Loss) (553) - (6,308) (6,861)
Identifiable Assets 115,485 - 19,060 134,545
Capital Expenditures 18,535 - 2,883 21,418
Depreciation & Amortization 8,529 - 848 9,377
</TABLE>
38
<PAGE> 41
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The Company also provides services in both domestic and foreign
locations. The following table sets forth financial information with respect
to the Company and its subsidiaries by geographic area (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
United States $157,349 $104,969 $57,293
India 5,381 5,360 3,260
Mexico - - 2,514
Southeast Asia 27,527 - -
Other Foreign - - -
Operating Income:
United States 77,565 30,564 (7,012)
India 923 1,265 (154)
Mexico - - 305
Southeast Asia 9,155 (333) -
Other Foreign (35) (11) -
Identifiable Assets:
United States 219,641 192,449 116,180
India 14,247 15,110 18,357
Mexico 9 9 8
Southeast Asia 99,846 38,092 -
Other Foreign 439 9,287 -
</TABLE>
The Company negotiates drilling contracts with a number of customers
for varying terms, and management believes it is not dependent upon any single
customer. For the years 1997, 1996 and 1995, sales to customers that
represented 10% or more of consolidated drilling revenues were as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
% OF TOTAL % OF TOTAL % OF TOTAL
REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE
-------- ----------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Customer A $11,371 * $20,461 19% $ 8,742 14%
Customer B 48,235 25% 17,629 16% 1,489 *
</TABLE>
* Less than 10%
As is typical in the industry, the Company does business with a
relatively small number of customers at any given time. The loss of any one of
such customers could, at least on a short-term basis, have a material adverse
effect on the Company's profitability. Management believes, however, that at
current levels of drilling activity, the Company would have alternative
customers for its services if it lost any single customer and that the loss of
any one customer would not have a material adverse effect on the Company on a
long-term basis.
(12) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In August 1997 Marine Drilling Companies (Norway) ASA acquired 100% of
Norwegian Drilling Technology AS ("NDT") a Norwegian corporation. Idar
Iversen, President and Chief Executive Officer of Marine Drilling Companies
(Norway) ASA owned 50% of NDT at the time of the purchase. Mr. Iversen no
longer has any interests in NDT.
39
<PAGE> 42
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(13) UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
A summary of unaudited quarterly consolidated financial information
for 1997 and 1996 is as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
- -------------------------------------------- --------------- ------------- -------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 36,750 $ 44,486 $ 51,198 $ 57,823
Operating income 14,912 19,875 24,852 27,969
Income before income taxes 15,659 20,520 25,206 28,451
Income tax expense 5,481 7,182 8,918 9,875
Net income 10,178 13,338 16,288 18,576
Basic earnings per share (1) $0.20 $0.26 $0.32 $0.36
Diluted earnings per share (1) $0.19 $0.25 $0.31 $0.35
Basic average common shares 51,329,966 51,408,251 51,650,599 51,883,567
Diluted average common shares 52,494,250 52,604,369 52,601,492 52,855,969
Average day rates (2) $ 32,768 $ 35,539 $ 39,338 $ 42,585
Marketed rigs (weighted average) 12.5 13.8 14.4 14.8
Utilization of marketed rigs 100% 100% 98% 100%
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
- -------------------------------------------- -------------- ------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $21,239 $27,360 $29,819 $31,911
Operating income 3,600 6,605 10,032 11,248
Income before income taxes 3,669 6,652 10,404 11,531
Income tax expense 1,357 2,398 3,714 4,117
Net income 2,312 4,254 6,690 7,414
Basic earnings per share (1) $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.16
Diluted earnings per share $0.05 $0.09 $0.15 $0.16
Basic average common shares 43,804,288 44,338,438 45,028,616 46,483,305
Diluted average common shares 44,880,654 45,266,927 45,896,929 47,615,675
Average day rates (2) $21,026 $23,505 $24,932 $27,462
Marketed rigs (weighted average) 11.8 12.8 13.0 12.6
Utilization of marketed rigs 94% 100% 100% 100%
</TABLE>
- --------------------------
(1) Quarterly net income per common share may not total to annual results
due to rounding.
(2) "Average day rate" is determined by dividing the total gross revenue
earned by the Company's rigs during a given period by the total number
of days that the Company's rigs were under contract during that
period.
During 1997, the Company's average marketed rigs and day rates
increased due primarily to the greater demand for drilling rigs and increased
level of drilling activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and from the activation
of the Marine 500 in late February 1997 and the Marine 305 in late August 1997.
During 1996, the Company's average marketed rigs and day rates
increased due primarily to the greater demand for drilling rigs and increased
level of drilling activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The fourth quarter
showed a decrease in average marketed rigs due to the removal from marketed
status of the MARINE 15 which was damaged by a fire in November 1996 and is
being repaired. Furthermore, average day rates continued to increase due to
improved market conditions.
40
<PAGE> 43
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(14) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
During January 1998 the Company signed a contract with Esso
Exploration Inc., an affiliate of Exxon Corporation, for the Marine 700. The
contract covers a primary term of three years beginning first quarter of 1999
and is expected to generate day rate revenues of approximately $207 million
during its primary term. Final construction of the Marine 700, a deepwater
semi-submersible drilling rig, will be at HAM Shipyard in Pascagoula,
Mississippi. The unit will be initially equipped to work in water depths up to
5,000 feet, readily upgradable to 7,500 feet. Marine 700 will be available to
Exxon affiliates for work worldwide, outside the North Sea.
41
<PAGE> 44
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
The information called for by Part III, Items 10 through 13, of Form
10-K is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Proxy Statements
relating to its annual meeting of Shareholders to be held May 14, 1998, which
will be filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission no
later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year. Also reference is made
to the information contained under the captioned "Executive Officers of
Registrant" contained in Part I hereof.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The following documents are included in Part III, Item 8:
Consolidated Financial Statements
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Independent Auditors' Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1997 and 1996 . . . . . . . . 22
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997 . . . . . . 24
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
</TABLE>
All other schedules are omitted as the information is not required or is not
applicable.
42
<PAGE> 45
(2) Exhibits
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number
------
<S> <C> <C>
3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 28.17 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant dated
October 30, 1992).
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 28.18 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant dated
October 30, 1992).
++ 10.1 Employment Agreement between Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and Jan Rask dated June
18, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q for quarter ended
June 30, 1996).
++ 10.3 Severance Agreement between Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and H. Larry Adkins dated
July 18, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-Q for quarter
ended September 30, 1996).
++ 10.5 Severance Agreement between Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and Danny R. Richardson
dated July 18, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 on Form 10-Q for
quarter ended September 30, 1996).
++ 10.6 Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Plan (incorporated by
reference to Annex A of the Company's Proxy Statement dated July 17, 1995).
++ * 10.7 Employment Agreement between Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and T. Scott O'Keefe
dated January 12, 1998.
++ * 10.8 Severance Agreement between Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and V. G. Bounds dated
October 23, 1996.
++ 10.18 The Marine Drilling 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.26 of the Company's Registration Statement No. 33-52470 on Form S-1).
++ 10.25 Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan effective July 1, 1996.
10.26 Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. Shareholders Rights Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibits 1 - 5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant dated
November 15, 1996).
10.27 Credit Agreement dated as of March 7, 1997 among Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.
Bankers Trust Company, Christiania Bank og Kreditkasse, New York Branch and certain
other banks including Exhibit A thereto.
* 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
* 23.1 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
* 27 Financial Data Schedule.
* Filed herewith.
++ Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement
required to be filed as an exhibit to this report.
</TABLE>
- -------------------------------
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
No reports were filed on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 1997.
43
<PAGE> 46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of
Sugar Land, State of Texas, on March 24, 1998.
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC.
By /s/ Jan Rask
----------------------------------
Jan Rask
President
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
<S> <C> <C>
/s/Robert L. Barbanell Chairman of the Board March 24, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Barbanell
/s/Jan Rask President Chief Executive Officer March 24, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- And Director
Jan Rask
/s/T. Scott O'Keefe Senior Vice President March 24, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer
T. Scott O'Keefe (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/Joan R. Smith Vice President, Controller March 24, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- and Secretary
Joan R. Smith (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/David A. B. Brown Director March 24, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
David A. B. Brown
/s/Howard I. Bull Director March 24, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Howard I. Bull
/s/Nathaniel A. Gregory Director March 24, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Nathaniel A. Gregory
/s/ Christopher M. Linneman Director March 24, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Christopher M. Linneman
/s/ Robert C. Thomas Director March 24, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Robert C. Thomas
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE> 47
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER EXHIBITS
- ------ --------
<S> <C>
10.7 Employment Agreement between Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and T. Scott O'Keefe
10.8 Severance Agreement between Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. and V. G. Bounds
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
27 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.7
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made by and between MARINE
DRILLING COMPANIES, INC. ("Company") and T. SCOTT O'KEEFE ("Executive").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Company is desirous of employing Executive in an executive
capacity on the terms and conditions, and for the consideration, hereinafter
set forth and Executive is desirous of being employed by Company on such terms
and conditions and for such consideration;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises,
covenants and obligations contained herein, Company and Executive agree as
follows:
ARTICLE 1: EMPLOYMENT, DUTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS
1.1 EMPLOYMENT; EFFECTIVE DATE. Company agrees to employ Executive
and Executive agrees to be employed by Company, beginning as of the Effective
Date (as hereinafter defined) and continuing for the period of time set forth
in Article 2 of this Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, the "Effective Date" shall be
January 12, 1998, and the "Commencement Date" shall be January 16, 1998.
1.2 POSITION. From and after the Effective Date, Company shall
employ Executive in the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Company, or in such other positions as the parties mutually may
agree.
1.3 DUTIES AND SERVICES. Executive agrees to serve in the position
referred to in paragraph 1.2 and to perform diligently and to the best of his
abilities the duties and services appertaining to such office, as well as such
additional duties and services appropriate to such office which the parties
mutually may agree upon from time to time. Executive's employment shall also
be subject to the policies maintained and established by Company, as the same
may be amended from time to time that are applicable to employees generally.
1.4 OTHER INTERESTS. Executive agrees, during the period of his
employment by Company from and after the Commencement Date, to devote his
primary business time, energy and best efforts to the business and affairs of
Company and its affiliates and not to engage, directly or indirectly, in any
other business or businesses, whether or not similar to that of Company, except
with the consent of the Board of Directors of Company (the "Board of
Directors"). The foregoing notwithstanding, the parties recognize and agree
that Executive may engage in passive personal investments and other business
activities that do not conflict with the business and affairs of Company or
interfere with Executive's performance of his duties hereunder. Executive
represents to Company that the execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement by Executive will not violate or conflict with any non-competition or
similar agreement to which Executive is subject.
<PAGE> 2
1.5 DUTY OF LOYALTY. Executive acknowledges and agrees that
Executive owes a fiduciary duty of loyalty, fidelity and allegiance to act at
all times in the best interests of Company and to do no act which would injure
the business, interests, or reputation of Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliates. In keeping with these duties, Executive shall make full disclosure
to Company of all business opportunities pertaining to Company's business and
shall not appropriate for Executive's own benefit business opportunities
concerning the subject matter of the fiduciary relationship.
1.6 REPRESENTATIONS. Executive represents and warrants to Company
that neither the execution of this Agreement by Executive nor the performance
by Executive of his obligations under this Agreement will result in a violation
or breach of, or constitute a default under, the provisions of any contract,
agreement, or other instrument to which Executive is a party.
ARTICLE 2: TERM AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
2.1 TERM. Unless sooner terminated pursuant to other provisions
hereof, Company agrees to employ Executive for the period beginning on the
Effective Date and ending on the second anniversary of the Commencement Date
(the "Initial Term"). Said term of employment shall be extended automatically
for an additional successive one-year period as of the last day of the Initial
Term and as of the last day of each such successive one-year period of time
thereafter that this Agreement is in effect; provided, however, that if, prior
to ninety days before the last day of the Initial Term or any such one-year
term of employment, either party shall give written notice to the other that no
such automatic extension shall occur, then Executive's employment shall
terminate on the last day of the Initial Term or the one-year term of
employment, as applicable, during which such notice is given.
2.2 COMPANY'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE. Notwithstanding the provisions of
paragraph 2.1, Company shall have the right to terminate Executive's employment
under this Agreement at any time for any of the following reasons:
(i) upon Executive's death;
(ii) upon Executive's becoming incapacitated by
accident, sickness or other circumstance which renders him
mentally or physically incapable of performing the duties and
services required of him hereunder on a full-time basis for a
period of at least 90 consecutive days or for a period of 120
days during any 12-month period;
(iii) for cause, which for purposes of this Agreement
shall mean Executive (A) has engaged in gross negligence or
willful misconduct in the performance of the duties required of
him hereunder, (B) has been convicted of a felony or has been
convicted without further right of appeal of a misdemeanor
involving moral turpitude, (C) has willfully refused without
proper legal reason to perform the duties and responsibilities
required of him hereunder, (D) has materially breached any
material corporate policy or code of conduct established by
Company, or (E) has
-2-
<PAGE> 3
willfully engaged in conduct that he knows or should know is
materially injurious to Company or any of its affiliates;
(iv) for Executive's material breach of any material
provision of this Agreement which, if correctable, remains
uncorrected for 30 days following written notice to Executive by
Company of such breach; or
(v) for any other reason whatsoever, in the sole
discretion of the Board of Directors.
2.3 EXECUTIVE'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE. Notwithstanding the provisions
of paragraph 2.1, Executive shall have the right to terminate his employment
under this Agreement at any time for any of the following reasons:
(i) (A) a material breach by Company of any material
provision of this Agreement, including without limitation the
assignment to Executive of duties materially inconsistent with
duties of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Company, which, if correctable, remains uncorrected for 30
days following written notice of such breach by Executive to
Company or (B) a change within the prior thirty days of the
location of Executive's principal place of employment by Company
by more than fifty miles from the location of the Company's
principal executive office as of the date hereof; or
(ii) for any other reason whatsoever, in the sole
discretion of Executive.
2.4 NOTICE OF TERMINATION. If Company or Executive desires to
terminate Executive's employment hereunder at any time prior to expiration of
the term of employment as provided in paragraph 2.1, it or he shall do so by
giving written notice to the other party that it or he has elected to terminate
Executive's employment hereunder and stating the effective date and reason for
such termination, provided that no such action shall alter or amend any other
provisions hereof or rights arising hereunder, including, without limitation,
the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 hereof.
ARTICLE 3: COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
3.1 BASE SALARY. During the period of this Agreement, Executive
shall receive a minimum annual base salary commencing from and after the
Commencement Date equal to the greater of (i) $210,000 or (ii) such amount as
the parties mutually may agree upon from time to time. Executive's annual base
salary shall be paid in equal installments in accordance with the Company's
standard policy regarding payment of compensation to executives but no less
frequently than monthly.
3.2 BONUSES. Executive shall receive such bonuses, if any, as
Company shall determine in its sole discretion; provided, however, that
Executive shall receive a sign-on bonus of $75,000 on the Commencement Date of
this Agreement.
-3-
<PAGE> 4
3.3 INITIAL STOCK OPTION. On the Effective Date of this Agreement
(the "Date of Grant"), Company shall grant to Executive an option (the "Initial
Option") to purchase 175,000 shares of Company's common stock ("Stock")
pursuant to The Marine Drilling 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the
"Plan"). The purchase price for each share of Stock subject to the Initial
Option shall be $18.125 per share. Subject to the terms of the Plan and the
agreement to be executed by Company and Executive evidencing the Initial
Option, the Initial Option shall (i) have a term of 10 years (which term shall
begin on the Date of Grant), (ii) vest and become exercisable with respect to
(A) 25 % of the shares covered thereby on the first anniversary of the Date of
Grant, (B) an additional 25 % of the shares covered thereby on the second
anniversary of the Date of Grant, (C) an additional 25% of the shares covered
thereby on the third anniversary of the Date of Grant, and (D) an additional
25% of the shares covered thereby on the fourth anniversary of the Date of
Grant, and (iii) become vested and fully exercisable by Executive upon the
occurrence of a "Change in Control" (as such term is defined in the Plan) while
Executive is employed by Company.
3.4 LOAN GUARANTEE. At any time after the Effective Date of this
Agreement and for a term not to extend beyond March 3, 1998, Company agrees,
subject to terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon by and between
Company and Executive, to guarantee a loan (the "Loan") obtained by Executive
from a commercial lending institution on commercially reasonable terms, not to
exceed the sum of (i) the amount necessary for Executive to purchase 300,000
shares of common stock of Grey Wolf, Inc. at $1.50 per share pursuant to
existing stock options (ii) the amount of any federal tax withholding thereon
by Grey Wolf, Inc. pursuant to such purchase by Executive and (iii) the cost of
derivatives described below. In addition, Company agrees to reimburse
Executive for the interest paid by Executive on the Loan through March 3, 1998.
If Company is required to pay any principal on the Loan as a result of its
guarantee, Executive shall reimburse Company for such amount within five days
of Company's request for such payment. The failure by Executive to pay such
amounts shall be deemed to be sufficient reason for, among other things,
Company to terminate Executive's employment pursuant to Section 2.2(iv) hereof.
In addition, Executive agrees to reimburse Company for its cost of acquiring
derivatives that protect against price decline in such shares of Grey Wolf,
Inc. common stock to below the principal amount of such Loan.
3.5 VACATION. During each year of his employment, Executive shall be
entitled to four weeks of paid vacation.
3.6 OTHER PERQUISITES. During his employment hereunder from and
after the Commencement Date, Executive shall be afforded the following benefits
as incidences of his employment:
(i) CLUB EXPENSES - Company shall reimburse Executive
for monthly membership dues at a country club, but not for any
initiation fees with respect to such country club.
(ii) OTHER COMPANY BENEFITS - Executive and, to the
extent applicable, Executive's spouse, dependents and
beneficiaries, shall be allowed to participate in all benefits,
plans and programs, including improvements or modifications of
the same, which are now, or may hereafter be, available to
similarly-situated Company employees. Such benefits, plans and
programs may include, without limitation,
-4-
<PAGE> 5
health insurance or health care plan, life insurance, 401(k)
plan, disability insurance, vacation and sick leave benefits, and
the like. Company shall not, however, by reason of this
paragraph be obligated to institute, maintain, or refrain from
changing, amending, or discontinuing, any such benefit plan or
program, so long as such changes are similarly applicable to
executive employees generally.
ARTICLE 4: PROTECTION OF INFORMATION
4.1 DISCLOSURE TO EXECUTIVE. Company shall disclose to Executive, or
place Executive in a position to have access to or develop, trade secrets or
confidential information of Company or its affiliates; and/or shall entrust
Executive with business opportunities of Company or its affiliates; and/or
shall place Executive in a position to develop business good will on behalf of
Company or its affiliates.
4.2 DISCLOSURE TO AND PROPERTY OF COMPANY. All information, ideas,
concepts, improvements, discoveries, and inventions, whether patentable or not,
which are conceived, made, developed, or acquired by Executive, individually or
in conjunction with others, during Executive's employment by Company (whether
during business hours or otherwise and whether on Company's premises or
otherwise) which relate to Company's business, products, or services
(including, without limitation, all such information relating to corporate
opportunities, research, financial and sales data, pricing terms, evaluations,
opinions, interpretations, acquisitions prospects, the identity of customers or
their requirements, the identity of key contacts within the customer's
organizations or within the organization of acquisition prospects, or marketing
and merchandising techniques, prospective names, and marks) shall be disclosed
to Company and are and shall be the sole and exclusive property of Company
unless and to the extent such information is generally known in Company's
industry. Moreover, all documents, drawings, memoranda, notes, records, files,
correspondence, manuals, models, specifications, computer programs, E-mail,
voice mail, electronic databases, maps, and all other writings or materials of
any type embodying any of such information, ideas, concepts, improvements,
discoveries, and inventions are and shall be the sole and exclusive property of
Company unless and to the extent such information is generally known in
Company's industry. Upon termination of Executive's employment by Company, for
any reason, Executive promptly shall deliver the same, and all copies thereof,
to Company unless and to the extent such information is generally known in
Company's industry.
4.3 NO UNAUTHORIZED USE OR DISCLOSURE. Executive will not, at any
time during or after Executive's employment by Company, make any unauthorized
disclosure of any confidential business information or trade secrets of Company
or its affiliates, or make any use thereof, except in the carrying out of
Executive's employment responsibilities hereunder. Affiliates of the Company
shall be third party beneficiaries of Executive's obligations under this
paragraph. As a result of Executive's employment by Company, Executive may also
from time to time have access to, or knowledge of, confidential business
information or trade secrets of third parties, such as customers, suppliers,
partners, joint venturers, and the like, of Company and its affiliates.
Executive also agrees to preserve and protect the confidentiality of such third
party confidential information and trade secrets to the same extent, and on the
same basis, as Company's confidential business information and trade secrets,
unless and to the extent such information is generally known in Company's
industry.
-5-
<PAGE> 6
4.4 OWNERSHIP BY COMPANY. If, during Executive's employment by
company, Executive creates any work of authorship fixed in any tangible medium
of expression which is the subject matter of copyright (such as videotapes,
written presentations, or acquisitions, computer programs, E-mail, voice mail,
electronic databases, drawings, maps, architectural renditions, models,
manuals, brochures, or the like) relating to Company's business, products, or
services, whether such work is created solely by Executive or jointly with
others (whether during business hours or otherwise and whether on Company's
premises or otherwise), Company shall be deemed the author of such work if the
work is prepared by Executive in the scope of Executive's employment; or, if
the work is not prepared by Executive within the scope of Executive's
employment but is specially ordered by Company as a contribution to a
collective work, as a part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, as a
translation, as a supplementary work, as a compilation, or as an instructional
text, then the work shall be considered to be work made for hire and Company
shall be the author of the work. If such work is neither prepared by Executive
within the scope of Executive's employment nor a work specially ordered that is
deemed to be a work made for hire, then Executive hereby agrees to assign, and
by these presents does assign, to Company all of Executive's worldwide right,
title, and interest in and to such work and all rights of copyright therein.
4.5 ASSISTANCE BY EXECUTIVE. Both during the period of Executive's
employment by Company and thereafter, Executive shall assist Company and its
nominee, at any time, in the protection of Company's worldwide right, title,
and interest in and to information, ideas, concepts, improvements, discoveries,
and inventions, and its copyrighted works, including without limitation, the
execution of all formal assignment documents requested by Company or its
nominee and the execution of all lawful oaths and applications for patents and
registration of copyright in the United States and foreign countries.
4.6 REMEDIES. Executive acknowledges that money damages would not be
sufficient remedy for any breach of this Article by Executive, and Company
shall be entitled to enforce the provisions of this Article by specific
performance and injunctive relief as remedies for such breach or any threatened
breach. Such remedies shall not be deemed the exclusive remedies for a breach
of this Article, but shall be in addition to all remedies available at law or
in equity to Company, including the recovery of damages from Executive and his
agents involved in such breach and remedies available to Company pursuant to
other agreements with Executive.
ARTICLE 5: NONCOMPETITION OBLIGATIONS
5.1 IN GENERAL. As part of the consideration for the compensation
and benefits to be paid to Executive hereunder; to protect the trade secrets
and confidential information of Company and its affiliates that have been and
will in the future be disclosed or entrusted to Executive, the business good
will of Company and its affiliates that has been and will in the future be
developed by Executive, or the business opportunities that have been and will
in the future be disclosed or entrusted to Executive by Company and its
affiliates; and as an additional incentive for Company to enter into this
Agreement, Company and Executive agree to the noncompetition obligations
hereunder. If Executive's employment hereunder shall be terminated by
Executive prior to the expiration of the term provided in paragraph 2.1 for any
reason not described in paragraph 2.3(i) (including by Executive exercising his
right not to extend the term by giving notice pursuant to Section 2.1), then,
subject to the last sentence of this paragraph 5.1, Executive shall not,
directly or
-6-
<PAGE> 7
indirectly for Executive or for others, in any geographic area or market where
Company or any of its affiliates are conducting any business as of the date of
such termination of the employment relationship or have during the previous
twelve months conducted such business:
(i) engage in any business competitive with the
offshore drilling business conducted by Company;
(ii) render advice or services to, or otherwise assist,
any other person, association, or entity who is engaged, directly
or indirectly, in the offshore drilling business competitive
with the business conducted by Company with respect to such
competitive business;
(iii) induce any employee of Company or any of its
affiliates to terminate his or her employment with Company or
such affiliates, or hire or assist in the hiring of any such
employee by any person, association, or entity not affiliated
with Company.
These noncompetition obligations shall extend for six months after such
termination, except with respect to clause (iii) above, which shall continue
until the later of (i) the expiration of the term of this Agreement (or any
extended term) provided in paragraph 2.1 and (ii) the one year anniversary of
the termination of Executive's employment hereunder. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if Executive's employment hereunder shall be terminated by Executive
prior to the expiration of the term provided in paragraph 2.1 for any reason
not described in paragraph 2.3(i), then within 10 days of the Company's receipt
of notice from Executive electing to terminate such employment, the Company by
written notice to Executive shall elect to either pay Executive only such
compensation as required by Section 7.1, in which event clauses (i) and (ii)
above shall not apply, or the Company shall agree to pay Executive an amount
equal to 50% of Executive's annual base salary as in effect pursuant to
paragraph 3.1 immediately prior to Executive's termination of employment with
Company, in which event clauses (i) and (ii) above shall apply as aforesaid.
5.2 ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES. Executive understands that the
restrictions set forth in paragraph 5.1 may limit Executive's ability to engage
in certain businesses anywhere in the world during the period provided for
above, but acknowledges that Executive will receive sufficiently high
remuneration and other benefits under this Agreement to justify such
restriction. Executive acknowledges that money damages would not be sufficient
remedy for any breach of this Article by Executive, and Company shall be
entitled to enforce the provisions of this Article by specific performance and
injunctive relief as remedies for such breach or any threatened breach. Such
remedies shall not be deemed the exclusive remedies for a breach of this
Article, but shall be in addition to all remedies available at law or in equity
to Company, including without limitation, the recovery of damages from
Executive and Executive's agents involved in such breach and remedies available
to Company pursuant to other agreements with Executive.
5.3 REFORMATION. It is expressly understood and agreed that Company
and Executive consider the restrictions contained in this Article to be
reasonable and necessary to protect the proprietary information of Company.
Nevertheless, if any of the aforesaid restrictions are found by a court having
jurisdiction to be unreasonable, or overly broad as to geographic area or time,
or
-7-
<PAGE> 8
otherwise unenforceable, the parties intend for the restrictions therein set
forth to be modified by such courts so as to be reasonable and enforceable and,
as so modified by the court, to be fully enforced.
ARTICLE 6: STATEMENTS CONCERNING COMPANY
6.1 IN GENERAL. Executive shall refrain, both during the employment
relationship and after the employment relationship terminates, from publishing
any oral or written statements about Company, any of its affiliates, or any of
such entities' officers, employees, agents or representatives that are
slanderous, libelous, or defamatory; or that disclose private or confidential
information about Company, any of its affiliates, or any of such entities'
business affairs, officers, employees, agents, or representatives that Employee
knows or should know is materially injurious to Company or such affiliate; or
that constitute an intrusion into the seclusion or private lives of Company,
any of its affiliates, or any of such entities' officers, employees, agents, or
representatives that Employee knows or should know is materially injurious to
Company or such affiliate; or that give rise to unreasonable publicity about
the private lives of Company, any of its affiliates, or any of such entities'
officers, employees, agents, or representatives; or that place Company, any of
its affiliates, or any of such entities' officers, employees, agents, or
representatives in a false light before the public; or that constitute a
misappropriation of the name or likeness of Company, any of its affiliates, or
any of such entities' officers, employees, agents, or representatives. A
violation or threatened violation of this prohibition may be enjoined by the
courts. The rights afforded Company and its affiliates under this provision
are in addition to any and all rights and remedies otherwise afforded by law.
ARTICLE 7: EFFECT OF TERMINATION ON COMPENSATION
7.1 BY EXPIRATION. If Executive's employment hereunder shall
terminate upon expiration of the term provided in paragraph 2.1 hereof, then
all compensation and all benefits (except stock options) to Executive hereunder
shall terminate contemporaneously with termination of his employment; provided,
however, that if Company shall be the party that gave written notice of such
termination, then Company shall, within 10 days after the last day of
Executive's employment with Company, pay Executive a lump sum cash payment in
an amount equal to 100% of Executive's annual base salary as in effect pursuant
to paragraph 3.1 immediately prior to such termination.
7.2 BY COMPANY. If Executive's employment hereunder shall be
terminated by Company prior to expiration of the term provided in paragraph
2.1, then, upon such termination, regardless of the reason therefor, all
compensation and benefits to Executive hereunder shall terminate
contemporaneously with the termination of such employment; provided, however,
that if such termination shall be for any reason other than those encompassed
by paragraphs 2.2(i), (ii), (iii), or (iv), the Company shall, within 10 days
after the last day of Executive's employment with Company, pay Executive a lump
sum cash payment in an amount equal to the Termination Payment. For purposes
of this Agreement, the term "Termination Payment" shall mean an amount equal to
the greater of (i) 100% of Executive's annual base salary as in effect pursuant
to paragraph 3.1 immediately prior to Executive's termination of employment
with Company or (ii) the aggregate base salary that would have been paid to
Executive (determined based upon the base salary in effect
-8-
<PAGE> 9
pursuant to paragraph 3.1 immediately prior to Executive's termination of
employment with Company) for the period beginning on the date of such
termination and ending on the last day of the employment term provided in
paragraph 2.1 during which occurs the date of such termination.
7.3 BY EXECUTIVE. If Executive's employment hereunder shall be
terminated by Executive prior to expiration of the term provided in paragraph
2.1, then, upon such termination, regardless of the reason therefor, all
compensation and benefits to Executive hereunder shall terminate
contemporaneously with the termination of such employment; provided, however,
that if such termination shall be pursuant to paragraph 2.3(i), the Company
shall, within 10 days after the last day of Executive's employment with
Company, pay Executive a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to the
Termination Payment.
7.4 CHANGE IN CONTROL. For purposes of this paragraph, the term
"Change in Control" shall have the same meaning as assigned to such term in The
Marine Drilling 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan. If, within two years following
the occurrence of a Change in Control, Executive's employment with Company
shall terminate under circumstances that would entitle him to a severance
payment pursuant to paragraph 7.1, 7.2, or 7.3, then, in lieu of any such
severance payment, Company shall, within 10 days after the last day of
Executive's employment with Company, pay Executive a lump sum cash payment
equal to 200% of Executive's annual base salary as in effect pursuant to
paragraph 3.1 immediately prior to such termination of employment.
7.5 CERTAIN ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS BY COMPANY. Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary in this Agreement, in the event that any payment or
distribution by Company to or for the benefit of Executive, whether paid or
payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement
or otherwise (a "Payment"), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any interest
or penalties with respect to such excise tax (such excise tax, together with
any such interest or penalties, are hereinafter collectively referred to as
the "Excise Tax"), Company shall pay to Executive an additional payment (a
"Gross-up Payment") in an amount such that after payment by Executive of all
state and federal taxes (including any interest or penalties imposed with
respect to such taxes), including any Excise Tax and any federal or state
income taxes imposed on any Gross-up Payment, Executive retains an amount of
the Gross-up Payment equal to the Excise Tax imposed upon the Payments;
provided, however, that in no event shall the Gross-up Payment exceed $500,000
(the "Gross-up Limitation"). Company and Executive shall make an initial
determination as to whether a Gross-up Payment is required and the amount of
any such Gross-up Payment. Executive shall notify Company immediately in
writing of any claim by the Internal Revenue Service which, if successful,
would require Company to make a Gross-up Payment (or a Gross-up Payment in
excess of that, if any, initially determined by Company and Executive) within
five days of the receipt of such claim. Company shall notify Executive in
writing at least five days prior to the due date of any response required with
respect to such claim if it plans to contest the claim. If Company decides to
contest such claim, Executive shall cooperate fully with Company in such
action; provided, however, that Company shall bear and pay directly or
indirectly all costs and expenses (including additional interest and penalties)
incurred in connection with such action and, subject to the Gross-up
Limitation, shall indemnify and hold Executive harmless, on an after-tax basis,
for any Excise Tax or income tax, including interest and penalties with respect
thereto, imposed as a result of Company's action. If, as a result of Company's
action with respect to a claim, Executive receives
-9-
<PAGE> 10
a refund of any amount paid by Company with respect to such claim, Executive
shall promptly pay such refund to Company. If Company fails to timely notify
Executive whether it will contest such claim or Company determines not to
contest such claim, then, subject to the Gross-up Limitation, Company shall
immediately pay to Executive the portion of such claim, if any, which it has
not previously paid to Executive.
7.6 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. In light of the difficulties in estimating
the damages for an early termination of this Agreement, Company and Executive
hereby agree that the payments, if any, to be received by Executive pursuant to
this Article 7 shall be received by Executive as liquidated damages.
ARTICLE 8: MISCELLANEOUS
8.1 NOTICES. For purposes of this Agreement, notices and all other
communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be deemed to
have been duly given when personally delivered or when mailed by United States
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid,
addressed as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
IF TO COMPANY TO: Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.
One Sugar Creek Center Blvd.,Suite 600
Sugar Land, Texas 77478
Attention: Chief Executive Officer
IF TO EMPLOYEE TO: Mr. T. Scott O'Keefe
14350 Carolcrest
Houston, Texas 77079
</TABLE>
or to such other address as either party may furnish to the other in writing in
accordance herewith, except that notices or changes of address shall be
effective only upon receipt.
8.2 APPLICABLE LAW. This Agreement is entered into under, and shall
be governed for all purposes by, the laws of the State of Texas.
8.3 NO WAIVER. No failure by either party hereto at any time to give
notice of any breach by the other party of, or to require compliance with, any
condition or provision of this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of similar or
dissimilar provisions or conditions at the same or at any prior or subsequent
time.
8.4 SEVERABILITY. If a court of competent jurisdiction determines
that any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, then the
invalidity or unenforceability of that provision shall not affect the validity
or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, and all other
provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
8.5 COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which
together will constitute one and the same Agreement.
-10-
<PAGE> 11
8.6 WITHHOLDING OF TAXES AND OTHER EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS. Company may
withhold from any benefits and payments made pursuant to this Agreement all
federal, state, city and other taxes as may be required pursuant to any law or
governmental regulation or ruling and all other normal employee deductions made
with respect to Company's employees generally.
8.7 HEADINGS. The paragraph headings have been inserted for purposes
of convenience and shall not be used for interpretive purposes.
8.8 GENDER AND PLURALS. Wherever the context so requires, the
masculine gender includes the feminine or neuter, and the singular number
includes the plural and conversely.
8.9 AFFILIATE. As used in this Agreement, the term "affiliate" shall
mean any entity which owns or controls, is owned or controlled by, or is under
common ownership or control with, Company.
8.10 ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of Company and any successor of Company, by merger or otherwise.
Except as provided in the preceding sentence, this Agreement, and the rights
and obligations of the parties hereunder, are personal and neither this
Agreement, nor any right, benefit, or obligation of either party hereto, shall
be subject to voluntary or involuntary assignment, alienation or transfer,
whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of
the other party; provided, however, that Company may assign this Agreement to a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Company as long as Company fully and unconditionally
guarantees the performance of this Agreement.
8.11 TERM. This Agreement has a term co-extensive with the term of
employment provided in paragraph 2.1. Termination shall not affect any right
or obligation of any party which is accrued or vested prior to such
termination. Without limiting the scope of the preceding sentence, the
provisions of Articles 4, 5, and 6 shall survive any termination of the
employment relationship and/or of this Agreement.
8.12 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. Except as provided in (i) the written benefit
plans and programs referenced in paragraph 3.6(ii) and (ii) any signed written
agreement contemporaneously or hereafter executed by Company and Executive,
this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with regard to
the subject matter hereof, and contains all the covenants, promises,
representations, warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to
employment of Executive by Company. Without limiting the scope of the
preceding sentence, all prior understandings and agreements among the parties
hereto relating to the subject matter hereof are hereby null and void and of no
further force and effect. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective
only if it is in writing and signed by the party to be charged.
-11-
<PAGE> 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the 12th
day of January, 1998 to be effective as of the Effective Date.
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC.
BY: /S/ JAN RASK
----------------------------
NAME: JAN RASK
TITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
"COMPANY"
/S/ T. SCOTT O'KEEFE
--------------------------------
T. SCOTT O'KEEFE
"EXECUTIVE"
-12-
<PAGE> 1
[MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES LETTERHEAD]
EXHIBIT 10.8
F A X
DATE: October 23, 1996
TO: Personnel & Compensation Committee --
David A. B. Brown
Howard I. Bull
FROM: William H. Flores
Re: Vincent G. ("Buddy") Bounds
Jan has asked me to advise you of our hiring of Buddy Bounds as a member of our
Deepwater Projects Team. Buddy will join us on 28 October 1996 as
Director--Deepwater Projects. We are extremely happy to have been able to hire
him in light of the Company's future activities. Prior to his employment with
the Company, Buddy held various Operations positions with Zapata
Offshore/Arethusa/Diamond Offshore as detailed in the attached press release
draft.
The terms of his employment are as follows:
o Salary -- $135,000/year
o Bonus Eligibility -- Pursuant to MDCO Incentive Policy
for Job Family 1 employees, i.e. up
to 50% of base salary payable
quarterly subject to Company
performance and individual job
ratings
o Severance -- One year base salary in the event of
a change in control and loss of
employment within one year
thereafter
o Vacation -- Pursuant to Company policy -- 2
weeks initially
o Stock Options -- Grant dated 23 October 1996 for
125,000 shares vesting over a
three-year period provided the
Company Executes a deepwater
drilling contract with Shell (the
Spar project)
o Other Benefits -- Buddy will be eligible to enroll in
the Welfare and Retirement Plans
available generally to Job Family 1
employees.
Thank you for your review of these arrangements. Please let me know if you
have questions or comments.
WHF/ljw
C: B. Barbanell
J. Rask
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 21.1
MARINE DRILLING COMPANIES, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES AND PARTNERSHIPS
DECEMBER 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Place of
Incorporation Ownership
Subsidiary/Partnership or Domicile Owner Percentage
- ------------------------------------------ ------------- ----------------------------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Marine Drilling Management Company Dover, Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. 100%
Delaware
USA
Marine Drilling International, Inc. Dover, Marine Drilling Management Company 100%
Delaware
USA
Marine 300 Series, Inc. Dover, Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. 100%
Delaware
USA
Marine Drilling Companies (Norway) ASA Bergen, Marine Drilling Companies, Inc. 96.3%
Norway
Norwegian Drilling Technology AS Bergen, Marine Drilling Companies (Norway) ASA 100%
Norway
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.:
We consent to incorporation by reference of our report dated January 20,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Marine Drilling Companies,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which
report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Marine
Drilling Companies, Inc., in the following registration statements of Marine
Drilling Companies, Inc.: (i) No. 33-56920 on Form S-8 dated January 11, 1993,
(ii) No. 33-61901 on Form S-8 dated August 17, 1995, (iii) No. 333-6995 on Form
S-4 dated June 27, 1996, and amended July 11, 1996, and (iv) No. 333-6997 on
Form S-3 dated June 27, 1996, amended July 11, 1996 and supplement dated
November 22, 1996.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Houston, Texas
March 30, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C> <C> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR YEAR YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997 DEC-31-1996 DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997 DEC-31-1996 DEC-31-1995
<CASH> 15,619 71,961 12,260
<SECURITIES> 0 9,990 0
<RECEIVABLES> 46,680 21,378 18,078
<ALLOWANCES> 0 0 0
<INVENTORY> 456 897 1,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 72,347 105,687 32,990
<PP&E> 310,122 182,200 123,442
<DEPRECIATION> 49,635 33,463 22,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 334,182 254,947 134,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 16,875 9,016 9,674
<BONDS> 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
<COMMON> 519 513 442
<OTHER-SE> 295,223 221,220 107,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 334,182 254,947 134,545
<SALES> 190,257 110,329 63,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 190,257 110,329 63,067
<CGS> 77,847 59,770 55,091
<TOTAL-COSTS> 77,847 59,770 55,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 16,995 11,576 9,377
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0 0 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 575 895 855
<INCOME-PRETAX> 89,836 32,256 (6,102)
<INCOME-TAX> 31,456 11,586 (2,080)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 58,380 20,670 (4,022)
<DISCONTINUED> 0 0 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0 0 0
<CHANGES> 0 0 0
<NET-INCOME> 58,380 20,670 (4,022)
<EPS-PRIMARY> 1.13 0.46 (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.11 0.45 (.09)
</TABLE>
