REINHOLD INDUSTRIES INC/DE/
8-K, 2000-11-02
AIRCRAFT PARTS & AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT, NEC
Previous: COEUR D ALENES CO /IA/, 4, 2000-11-02
Next: NUVEEN CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL MARKET OPPORTUNITY FUND INC, N-30D, 2000-11-02




                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)   November 1, 2000

                            REINHOLD INDUSTRIES,INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



     DELAWARE                     0-18434             13-2596288
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction     (Commission       (IRS Employer
of incorporation)                 File Number)      Identification No.)



12827 EAST IMPERIAL HWY., SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA                90670
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code      (562) 944-3281



                                      N/A
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
       (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Events

         The Company has been informed that it may be a potentially  responsible
party ("PRP") under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,  Compensation, and
Liability  Act  of  1980,  as  amended  ("CERCLA"),   with  respect  to  certain
environmental  liabilities  arising at the Valley Forge National Historical Park
Site ("Valley Forge Site") located in Montgomery  County,  Pennsylvania and at a
site  formerly  known  as the  Casmalia  Resources  Hazardous  Waste  Management
Facility,  located in Santa Barbara County, California ("Casmalia Site"). CERCLA
imposes liability for the costs of responding to a release or threatened release
of "hazardous  substances"  into the  environment.  CERCLA  liability is imposed
without regard to fault.  PRPs under CERCLA include current owners and operators
of the site,  owners and  operators at the time of disposal,  as well as persons
who arranged for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances sent to the site,
or persons who accepted hazardous  substances for transport to the site. Because
PRPs' CERCLA  liability  to the  government  is joint and several,  a PRP may be
required to pay more than its proportional share of such costs.  Liability among
PRPs, however, is subject to equitable allocation through contribution actions.

         On June 16, 2000 the U.S.  Department  of Justice  notified the Company
that it may be a PRP with respect to the Valley Forge Site and demanded  payment
for past costs incurred by the United States in connection with the site,  which
the Department of Justice estimated at $1,753,726  incurred by the National Park
Service  as of  May  31,  2000  and  $616,878  incurred  by  the  United  States
Environmental  Protection  Agency  ("EPA") as of November 30,  1999.  Payment of
these past  costs  would not  release  the  Company  from  liability  for future
response costs.

         Management  believes that in or about 1977, the Company's  predecessor,
Keene  Corporation  ("Keene"),  sold to the U.S.  Department of Interior certain
real property and  improvements  now located within the Valley Forge Site. Prior
to the sale,  Keene operated a  manufacturing  facility on the real property and
may have used friable  asbestos,  the substance which gives rise to the claim at
the Valley  Forge Site.  The Company is in the  process of  analyzing  the legal
foundations  of the  Department  of  Justice  claim in  light of the  bankruptcy
proceeding  described below. The Company believes that two injunctions issued in
1996 in connection with Keene's bankruptcy  proceeding under chapter 11 of Title
11 of the United  States Code  ("Bankruptcy  Code") are  relevant to the Justice
Department's claim.

         As previously reported, Keene acquired Reinhold in 1984. On December 3,
1993,  Keene  filed a  voluntary  petition  for relief  under  chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court. Keene's chapter 11 filing
came as a direct result of the demands on Keene of thousands of asbestos-related
lawsuits that named Keene as a party. On July 31, 1996 (the  "Effective  Date"),
Keene consummated its Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization,  as modified, under
the Bankruptcy  Code (the "Plan").  On the Effective  Date,  Reinhold was merged
into and with Keene,  with Keene becoming the surviving  corporation.  Keene, as
the surviving  corporation of the merger, was renamed Reinhold Industries,  Inc.
On the  Effective  Date,  pursuant  to the Plan the  Company  issued its Class B
Common Stock to the Trustees of a Creditors' Trust,  which was established under
the Plan to administer  Keene's asbestos  liabilities.  The Creditors' Trust has
since sold most of its Class B Common Stock.

         The general  bankruptcy  injunction issued in the chapter 11 proceeding
generally  prohibits  any entity  from  commencing  or  continuing  any  action,
employment  of process or act to collect,  offset,  affect or recover any claim,
demand, interest or cause of action satisfied,  released or discharged under the
Plan.  Such claims,  demands,  interests and causes of action  include,  whether
known or unknown,  all claims  against  Keene or the Company or their assets and
all related causes of action, regardless of whether a proof of claim or interest
was filed or  allowed,  and  whether or not the holder of such claim or interest
has voted on the Plan,  or any causes of action  based on any act or omission of
any kind  occurring  prior to the  Effective  Date.  In addition to this general
bankruptcy  injunction,  the  Company  received  the  benefit of a  supplemental
"Permanent Channeling Injunction" as part of the Plan.

         The Permanent Channeling Injunction bars "Asbestos-Related  Claims" and
"Demands," as defined in the Plan, against the Company and channels those Claims
and  Demands to the  Creditors'  Trust.  Pursuant  to the  Permanent  Channeling
Injunction, on or after the Effective Date of the Plan, any person or entity who
holds or may hold an  Asbestos-Related  Claim or Demand  against  Keene  will be
forever  stayed,  restrained,  and enjoined from taking certain  actions for the
purpose of, directly or indirectly, collecting, recovering, or receiving payment
of, on, or with respect to such  Asbestos-Related  Claims or Demands against the
Company.

         It is  difficult  to  estimate  the  timing  and  ultimate  costs to be
incurred by the Company in connection with environmental liability claims in the
future  due to  uncertainties  about  the  status of laws and  regulations,  the
adequacy of  information  available for  individual  sites and the extended time
periods  over  which  site  remediation  occurs.  However,  based  on  currently
available  information,  if the  environmental  liability claims relating to the
Valley  Forge Site arose  prior to the filing of Keene's  bankruptcy  case or if
these  claims were deemed to be  Asbestos-Related  Claims or Demands  within the
meaning  of the Plan,  then the  Company  does not  believe  that  environmental
liabilities  associated  with the Valley Forge Site should  result in a material
adverse impact on the Company's  consolidated  financial  position or results of
operation.  However, if these claims are deemed to have arisen subsequent to the
filing of Keene's bankruptcy case -- i.e the "release" or "threatened  release,"
within the meaning of CERCLA,  is deemed to have occurred  after Keene filed its
chapter 11  petition  with the  Bankruptcy  Court or the claims are held to have
arisen when the response  costs were incurred -- and these claims are not deemed
to be  Asbestos-Related  Claims or Demands as defined  under the Plan,  then the
Company could incur liability for the claims.  If a court were to determine that
the Company was liable for  recoverable  costs  associated with the Valley Forge
Site under CERCLA, the resulting  liability could have a material adverse impact
on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.

         With respect to the Casmalia Site, on August 11, 2000, the EPA notified
the Company that it is a PRP by virtue of waste materials deposited at the site.
The EPA has  designated  the Company as a "de minimis"  waste  generator at this
site,  based on the  amount  of waste at the  Casmalia  Site  attributed  to the
Company. The Company is in the process of evaluating its potential environmental
liability exposure at the Casmalia Site, and based on currently  available data,
the Company  believes  that the  Casmalia  Site is not likely to have a material
adverse impact on the Company's  consolidated  financial  position or results of
operations.

         FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS  Statements in this Current  Report on Form
8-K that are not  historical  facts are hereby  identified  as  "forward-looking
statements"  for the purpose of the safe  harbor  provided by section 21E of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (the  "Exchange  Act") and  section 27A of the
Securities  Act of 1933 (the  "Securities  Act").  Words such as  "believe"  and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking  statements.  These
forward-looking  statements are found at various places  throughout this Current
Report  on Form  8-K,  including  those  statements  relating  to the  potential
environmental  liabilities  at  the  Valley  Forge  and  Casmalia  Sites.  These
statements  necessarily  reflect  the best  judgment  of the  management  of the
Company and involve a number of risks and uncertainties  that could cause actual
results  to  differ  materially  from  those  suggested  by the  forward-looking
statements.  Such forward-looking statements should, therefore, be considered in
light of various  important  factors,  including those set forth in this Current
Report on Form 8-K.

         Important  factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from  assessments or  projections  contained in the  forward-looking  statements
include new developments in the law pertaining to CERCLA, the willingness of the
Department  of Justice to  negotiate  a  resolution  of its claims  against  the
Company  and the  ability of the  Company to  investigate  and  establish  facts
relating to Keene's  operations  at and/or use of the Valley  Forge and Casmalia
Sites.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereto duly authorized.

                                           REINHOLD INDUSTRIES, INC.


Date:  November 1, 2000                     By:     /s/ BRETT R. MEINSEN

                                                    Brett R. Meinsen
                                                    Vice President -
                                                    Finance and Administration






© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission