<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
[X] Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
or
[_] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. For the transition period from ________ to
________.
Commission file number 0-24020
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida 59-2948116
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
10901 Malcolm McKinley Drive
Tampa, Florida 33612
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(813) 972-6000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K [ X ]
The aggregate market value of the Registrant's Common Stock held by non-
affiliates on March 13, 1998 (based upon the average of the high and low prices
of the registrant's Common Stock reported for such date on The Nasdaq Stock
Market, was $8,131,787. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer
and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding Common
Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.
The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive
determination for other purposes. As of March 13, 1998, the registrant had
outstanding 16,292,221 shares of Common Stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
<PAGE>
Table of Contents
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page No.
--------
<C> <S> <C>
Part I
Item 1. Business............................................................................. 1
Item 2. Properties........................................................................... 5
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.................................................................... 5
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.................................. 5
Part II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters............ 6
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.............................................................. 7
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 9
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.......................................... 18
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. 38
Part III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant................................... 38
Item 11. Executive Compensation............................................................... 40
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management....................... 46
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions....................................... 49
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K..................... 50
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
PART I
Item 1. Business
Group Technologies Corporation ("GTC" or the "Company") provides advanced
manufacturing, engineering and testing services to original equipment
manufacturers ("OEMs") of electronic products. GTC is a majority-owned
subsidiary of Group Financial Partners, Inc. ("GFP" or the "Parent").
GTC custom manufactures complex circuit card assemblies, subsystems and
end-user products for use in a wide variety of markets, including automotive,
commercial avionics, computer, government systems, industrial electronics,
networking, space, and telecommunications. GTC offers its customers traditional
turnkey manufacturing solutions, including basic design services (such as board
layout, production and testing), materials management (including selection,
sourcing and procurement), automated assembly and quality assurance. GTC also
provides high-level engineering services, such as design services, software
development and product redesign. GTC believes that its ability to offer its
customers a broad range of sophisticated engineering services, which complement
its basic manufacturing services, gives it a competitive advantage.
On June 30, 1997, GTC sold its wholly-owned foreign operating subsidiaries
to SCI Systems, Inc. These foreign operations consisted of Group Technologies
S.A. de C.V. ("GTC Mexico"), a wholly-owned subsidiary located in Mexico City,
Mexico where it operated one manufacturing facility and Group Technologies
Suprimentos de Informatica Industria e Comercio Ltda. ("GTC Brazil"), a wholly-
owned subsidiary located in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil where it operated two
separate manufacturing facilities, one in Hortolandia and one in Campinas.
On March 16, 1998, the shareholders of GTC voted in favor of a merger with
two of GFP's subsidiaries and GFP (the "Merger"), followed by a reincorporation
of GTC in Delaware to be accomplished by GTC's merger with and into Sypris
Solutions, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of GTC. The effective date of the
merger is expected to be on or about March 30, 1998 at which time the combined
company will be known as Sypris Solutions, Inc.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements set forth in Item 1 and Item 7 in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K may constitute forward-looking statements that involve numerous risks
and uncertainties. Among the factors that can cause the Company's actual
performance to differ materially are the following: business conditions and
growth in the advanced manufacturing, engineering and testing services industry
and the general economy; competitive factors and price pressures; availability
of third party component parts at reasonable prices; inventory risks due to
shifts in market demand and/or price erosion of purchased components; changes in
product mix; cost and yield issues associated with the Company's manufacturing
facilities; the Company's ability to comply with the terms of its credit
facilities; dependence upon and ability to retain key personnel; ability to
comply with the rules for inclusion in the Nasdaq Stock Market, including
minimum stock bid price and market value requirements as discussed in Item 5 in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K; stock price fluctuations; the effect of
environmental laws; and the risk factors listed from time to time in the
Company's Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") filings. The
impact of certain of these factors experienced during 1996 and 1997 is more
fully discussed herein under the caption "Item 7. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Manufacturing Services
GTC provides its customers with a broad variety of solutions, from low-
volume prototype assembly to high-volume turnkey systems manufacturing. GTC
employs a multi-disciplined engineering team which provides comprehensive
manufacturing and design support to customers. The turnkey systems
1
<PAGE>
solutions offered by GTC include design conversion and enhancement, materials
procurement, system assembly, testing and final system configuration.
GTC's manufacturing capabilities are enhanced by up-to-date manufacturing
techniques. Among these techniques are just-in-time procurement and continuous
flow manufacturing (where practical), statistical process control, total quality
management, stringent and real-time engineering change control routines, and
total cycle time reduction techniques. GTC has also invested in integrated
manufacturing support systems to maximize performance. These systems provide a
continuous flow of information from the initial estimating phase of a project
through final shipment.
GTC provides varied levels of testing services, ranging from in-circuit
test, burn-in test and environmental stress screening to functional test.
Increasingly, GTC is asked to provide final systems assembly ("box build")
services. As a result, testing procedures and equipment are required to ensure
that finished products are tested to standards that reflect their required use.
Engineering Services
GTC utilizes its advanced engineering services capabilities to provide its
customers with complete system solutions that exceed the scope of traditional
turnkey services provided by most contract manufacturers. GTC believes that the
ability to provide its customers with these services, including software
development, design services, prototype development, product reengineering,
feature enhancement, product ruggedization, cost reduction, product
miniaturization, and EMI interference and shielding is instrumental in moving
new products to market quickly and regularly. GTC's engineers perform design
work on a contract basis for a number of customers, including those requiring
high levels of security clearance.
Customers and Marketing
GTC has pursued the diversification of its market segments and customer
base and has sought relationships with leading OEMs in the markets it serves.
GTC's principal sources of new business originate from the expansion of existing
relationships, referrals and direct sales through senior management, direct
sales personnel, and market specialists. Supported by the executive staff,
market specialists identify and attempt to develop relationships with potential
OEM customers who meet a certain profile, which includes financial stability,
industry leadership, need for technology driven turnkey manufacturing,
anticipated unit volume growth and long-term relationship potential.
GTC's sales efforts are further supported by advertising in numerous trade
media and sales literature and by promotions. GTC promotes the concept of
manufacturing relationships with each of its customers. The focus of this
relationship is centered on the belief that GTC and its employees must become an
essential part of every customer's operations. To facilitate this relationship,
GTC employs program managers who are dedicated to one or more customers to
ensure that customer contract requirements are met and that information critical
to the success of each program is communicated and acted upon in an expedient
fashion. This requires that program managers maintain close contact with GTC
employees and with the customers that they support, communicating project status
in addition to resolving specific issues which arise. GTC believes that this
dedicated relationship is critical to meeting the dynamic needs of its
customers.
During the last three years, GTC's largest individual commercial customer
was IBM, which accounted for approximately 16%, 16%, and 19%, of GTC's revenue
in 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively. Sales to International Game Technology
represented approximately 10% of GTC's revenue in 1996. Sales to Kulicke and
Soffa Industries represented approximately 12% of the Company's revenue in 1997.
GTC's sales of products and services to United States government agencies
represented approximately 20%, 17% and 27% of GTC's revenue in 1995, 1996 and
1997, respectively. GTC's sales of products and services to a variety of prime
contractors under contract with the federal government, in the aggregate,
represented approximately 9%, 12% and 13% of GTC's revenue in 1995, 1996 and
1997, respectively.
2
<PAGE>
Competition
GTC operates in a highly competitive environment and competes against
numerous domestic and foreign manufacturers. GTC's competitors include AVEX
Electronics, Benchmark Electronics, DII Group, IEC Electronics, Plexus, SCI
Systems, Sanmina, and Solectron. In addition, GTC may encounter competition in
the future from other large electronic manufacturers which are selling, or may
begin to sell, contract manufacturing services. GTC may also face competition
from the manufacturing operations of its current and potential OEM customers,
which GTC believes continue to evaluate the merits of manufacturing products
internally versus the value of contract manufacturing.
GTC believes that the primary basis of competition in its targeted markets
are time to market, capability, price, manufacturing quality, advanced
manufacturing technology and reliable delivery. GTC believes that it generally
competes favorably with respect to each of these factors. To remain competitive,
GTC must continue to provide technologically advanced manufacturing services,
maintain world-class quality levels, offer flexible delivery schedules, deliver
finished products on a reliable basis and compete favorably on the basis of
price.
Backlog
GTC's order backlog at December 31, 1997 was approximately $67 million as
compared to order backlog at December 31, 1996 of approximately $65 million.
Backlog consists of firm purchase orders and commitments, substantially all of
which is expected to be filled within twelve months. However, since orders and
commitments may be rescheduled or canceled, backlog is not a definitive
indicator of future financial performance.
Suppliers
GTC procures components from a broad group of suppliers, determined on an
assembly-by-assembly basis. Some of the products and assemblies manufactured by
GTC require one or more components that may be available from only a single
source. Also, certain components are allocated in response to supply shortages.
GTC attempts to ensure the continuity of supply of these components. In cases
where unanticipated customer demand or supply shortages occur, GTC attempts to
arrange for alternative sources of supply, where available, or defers planned
production to meet the anticipated availability of the critical component. In
some cases, supply shortages will substantially curtail production of all
assemblies using a particular component. In addition, at various times there
have been industry-wide shortages of electronic components, especially memory
and logic devices. While GTC has not experienced significant material shortages
in the recent past, such shortages could produce significant short-term
interruptions of GTC's future operations.
GTC believes it fosters fair and strong relationships with its suppliers.
These relationships are built upon a history of GTC providing suppliers with
accurate and timely information when ordering materials and responding to the
suppliers' requirements. In return, suppliers are expected to provide
competitive material prices with flexible delivery schedules, to honor their
commitments for delivery of materials on time, and to meet or exceed all quality
requirements.
Research and Development
GTC invested $3.0 million, $0.3 million and $0.1 million, in research and
development in 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively. The investments made prior to
1996 were made primarily in support of GTC's name brand products line of
business, substantially all of which was divested by GTC by the end of the first
quarter of 1996. GTC also utilizes its research and development capability to
develop processes and technologies for the benefit of its customers. GTC plans
to perform a limited amount of research and development in the future. GTC
cannot forecast the impact of such expenditures upon the overall success of its
sales.
3
<PAGE>
Proprietary Rights, Patents and Trademarks
GTC regards its manufacturing processes and circuit designs as proprietary
trade secrets and confidential information. GTC relies largely upon a
combination of trade secret laws, agreements with its OEM customers, internal
security systems, confidentiality procedures and employee agreements to maintain
the trade secrecy of its circuit designs and manufacturing processes. Although
GTC takes steps to protect its trade secrets, there can be no assurance that
misappropriation will not occur.
GTC licenses some technology from third parties which it uses in providing
manufacturing services to its OEM customers. GTC believes that such licenses are
generally available on commercial terms from a number of licensors. Generally,
the agreements governing such technology grant GTC nonexclusive, worldwide
licenses with respect to the subject technology and terminate upon a material
breach by GTC.
Although GTC does not believe that its circuit designs or manufacturing
processes infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties, there can be no
assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against GTC in
the future with respect to current or future designs or processes. Any such
assertion may require GTC to enter into a royalty arrangement or result in
costly litigation.
Certifications
GTC's Tampa facility is certified to ISO 9001, the international standard
for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and
service. GTC also meets the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's
NHB5300.4 specification for space programs and numerous military specifications
including MIL-Q-9858A (quality program), MIL-STD-2000A (high-reliability
soldering), MIL-STD 45662 (calibration and metrology) and MIL-STD-801D
(environmental testing). GTC also meets certain manufacturing and quality
practices required by the Federal Aviation Administration. GTC will continue to
utilize these certifications to provide service to these and other niche
markets.
Government Regulation
GTC's operations are subject to certain federal, state and local regulatory
requirements relating to environmental, waste management, health and safety
matters. Management believes that GTC's business is operated in material
compliance with applicable regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency and
corresponding state agencies which, respectively, pertain to health and safety
in the workplace and the use, discharge and storage of chemicals employed in the
manufacturing process. Current costs of compliance are not material to GTC.
However, new or modified requirements, not presently anticipated, could be
adopted creating additional expense for GTC.
GTC's former leased facility located on Waters Avenue in Tampa, Florida is
currently subject to remediation activities related to ground water
contamination by methylene chloride and other volatile organic compounds which
occurred prior to GTC's lease of the facility. Through a series of evaluations,
it was determined that ground water contamination is also present off site. In
December 1986, Honeywell, Inc. ("Honeywell"), a prior operator of the facility,
entered into a consent order (the "Consent Order") with the State of Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation under which Honeywell agreed to take
certain corrective action to remediate the contamination. These remediation
activities include the installation of recovery wells and the treatment of the
contaminated ground water. Under the Consent Order, Honeywell assumed the
responsibility for initiating and conducting these remediation activities,
including the annual cost associated with these remediation activities,
currently estimated to be up to $500,000 per year. At the time GTC purchased the
assets of the business located on this leased site, it obtained an agreement
from the seller, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, to indemnify and
hold GTC harmless with respect to such matters. GTC vacated the property in
December 1994, at which time its lease obligation expired.
4
<PAGE>
In the course of Metrum Inc.'s ("Metrum"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
GTC, acquisition of certain assets of a business from Alliant Techsystems, Inc.
("Alliant"), Metrum and GTC became aware of ground water contamination that will
require remedial action at the facility where the business was located in
Littleton, Colorado. Evaluations indicate that certain chlorinated solvents were
disposed of on the site by a previous owner of the business and these solvents
have contaminated the ground water. In December 1995, a remediation system
approved by the state of Colorado was put in place and it is estimated that the
clean-up cost could reach as high as $20 million in the aggregate. As part of
the agreement for the purchase and sale of the assets of the business, Alliant
agreed to indemnify and hold Metrum harmless with respect to such matters.
Metrum leased the facility from Alliant and continued operations on the site
until substantially all of the assets of the business were sold on February 9,
1996. Metrum and GTC agreed to indemnify and hold buyer harmless with respect to
such matters.
Employees
As of December 31, 1997, GTC employed approximately 700 employees, all of
which were employed in the United States. GTC employed approximately 80 people
in finance, sales or administration, 520 people in manufacturing operations and
100 people in various engineering functions. Approximately 350 of GTC's
employees are represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
collective bargaining unit. In 1993, GTC and the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters signed a five-year contract. GTC believes its relationships with its
employees are good.
Geographic Segments
All of GTC's operations for 1995, 1996 and 1997 were located in the United
States, Mexico and Brazil. Following the sale of the international operations on
June 30, 1997, GTC's operations are located entirely in the United States.
Item 2. Properties
GTC's headquarters are in a 308,000 square foot office and manufacturing
facility on Malcolm McKinley Drive in Tampa, Florida which GTC occupies under a
ten-year lease expiring in April 2002 (with two additional five-year options).
Adjacent to its Tampa headquarters, GTC leases a 60,000 square foot warehouse.
The Company believes that these facilities are well maintained, are in good
condition and are adequate for its operating needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
GTC is, from time to time, a party to litigation which arises in the normal
course of its business. There is no litigation pending, or to GTC's knowledge,
threatened which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect
upon the business or financial condition of GTC. However, in connection with
GTC's Metrum subsidiary, GTC has been notified that a claim of up to $4.0
million may be asserted against Metrum related to contracts allegedly acquired
by Metrum from Alliant Techsystems, Inc. While GTC believes that Metrum has
valid defenses to such a claim, an adverse determination on the claim would have
a material adverse effect on GTC.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders of GTC during the
fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 1997.
5
<PAGE>
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters
The shares of GTC's voting Common Stock are quoted on the Nasdaq Stock
Market under the symbol GRTK. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low sales prices per share for GTC's Common Stock as
reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
High Low
<S> <C> <C>
Year ended December 31, 1996
First Quarter (January 1, 1996 - March 31, 1996)...... $3.750 $2.125
Second Quarter (April 1, 1996 - June 30, 1996)........ $4.250 $2.125
Third Quarter (July 1, 1996 - September 30, 1996)..... $3.000 $1.750
Fourth Quarter (October 1, 1996 - December 31, 1996).. $2.625 $0.750
Year ended December 31, 1997
First Quarter (January 1, 1997 - March 31, 1997)...... $1.875 $1.000
Second Quarter (April 1, 1997 - June 30, 1997)........ $1.500 $0.813
Third Quarter (July 1, 1997 - September 30, 1997)..... $4.125 $1.125
Fourth Quarter (October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997).. $4.563 $2.750
</TABLE>
As of March 13, 1998, there were 641 holders of record of the Company's
Common Stock.
The National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") recently updated
rules which result in new minimum criteria which a company must meet for
inclusion in either the Nasdaq Stock Market or the Small Cap Market. Under the
recently adopted rules, companies will be required to meet higher financial
standards and maintain a stated minimum bid of at least $1.00 per share, or else
face termination of their designation for inclusion in either the Nasdaq Stock
Market or Small Cap Market. Additionally, the updated rules of the Nasdaq Stock
Market state that in order to remain eligible for Nasdaq listing, a security
must have a bid price of at least $1.00 per share and the market value of
publicly held shares (those held by persons other than officers, directors and
10% shareholders) must be at least $5.0 million and the company's net tangible
assets must be at least $4.0 million. On December 31, 1996, GTC received a
letter from the Nasdaq Stock Market concerning GTC's failure to meet the then
applicable listing requirements as of December 30, 1996. The closing bid price
of GTC Common Stock on December 30, 1996 was $0.75 and the market value of the
public float as of that date was $2.1 million. Accordingly, on that date the
GTC Common Stock did not meet the Nasdaq listing requirements. The closing
price of the GTC Common Stock on December 31, 1997 was $2.8125, with a
corresponding market float of approximately $9.0 million. While the GTC Common
Stock is currently quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market, there can be no assurance
that its designation for inclusion thereon will not be terminated if GTC is not
able to meet the updated NASD rules. If the designation of GTC Common Stock is
terminated, trading in the GTC Common Stock would thereafter be conducted in the
over-the-counter market in the so-called "pink sheets" or, if then available,
the "OTC Bulletin Board Service". As a result, an investor would likely find it
to be more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the
value of, the GTC Common Stock.
Pursuant to the criteria established by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, a security that fails to meet certain requirements, including having
a market price of $5.00 or more and being a reported security, is deemed to be
"penny stock" and broker transactions in such stock are subject to extensive
disclosure requirements regarding, among other things, pricing and trading
activity information on such stock. The penny stock rules require the delivery,
prior to any transaction in such stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the
penny stock market and the risks associated therewith, and impose various sales
practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stock to persons other
than established customers and accredited investors. For these types of
transaction, the broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination
for the purchaser and must have received the purchaser's written consent to the
transaction prior
6
<PAGE>
to the sale. If GTC Common Stock is ever deemed to be penny stock, the
application of such rules could have the effect of discouraging trading in such
stock.
The Company has historically not declared or paid any cash dividend on
the Common Stock. The Company presently intends to retain all of its earnings
for the future operation and growth of its business and does not intend to pay
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of cash dividends in the
future will be dependent upon the Company's results of operations, earnings,
capital requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors considered
relevant by the Board of Directors. The Company's existing credit facilities
prohibit the Company from declaring or making any dividend or other
distributions on the Common Stock.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected historical consolidated financial data should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related
notes thereto in Item 8 and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 7.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1993(1) 1994 1995(2) 1996(3) 1997(4)
------- ---- ------- ------- -------
(in thousands, except for per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue...................................... $243,856 $274,147 $273,647 $224,661 $113,356
Cost of operations........................... 200,408 237,867 269,150 217,890 112,202
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross profit................................. 43,448 36,280 4,497 6,771 1,154
Selling, general and administrative expense.. 21,808 20,561 19,683 11,453 6,504
Research and development..................... 4,138 5,170 3,041 299 99
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss)...................... 17,502 10,549 (18,227) (4,981) (5,449)
Interest expense............................. 1,647 2,048 2,907 2,858 1,069
Other expense (income)....................... -- 504 521 (59) (3,474)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes............ 15,855 7,997 (21,655) (7,780) (3,044)
Income taxes................................. 5,882 3,297 (3,982) 799 152
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)............................ $ 9,973 $ 4,700 $(17,673) $ (8,579) $ (3,196)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic...................................... $ 0.73 $ 0.31 $ (1.13) $ (0.53) $ (0.20)
Diluted.................................... $ 0.70 $ 0.30 $ (1.13) $ (0.53) $ (0.20)
Shares used in computing per share amounts:
Basic...................................... 13,641 14,959 15,695 16,157 16,224
Diluted.................................... 14,216 15,789 15,695 16,157 16,224
</TABLE>
7
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
----------------------------------------------
1993(5) 1994 1995(6) 1996(7) 1997(8)
------- ---- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital.................................................... $ 37,305 $ 56,622 $ 23,922 $ 7,839 $12,059
Total assets....................................................... 111,925 122,566 113,106 67,465 47,364
Current portion of long-term debt.................................. 4,271 2,080 8,171 3,513 198
Long-term debt, less current portion............................... 30,362 30,392 23,050 10,119 --
Redeemable Common Stock and related additional paid-in capital..... 2,508 -- -- -- --
Redeemable Preferred Stock and related additional paid-in capital.. -- -- -- -- 2,500
Total shareholders' equity......................................... 17,340 42,799 25,840 19,403 17,846
</TABLE>
_______________
(1) Reflects the results of operations from the date of acquisition of Metrum,
Inc. ("Metrum") and Philips Circuit Assemblies ("PCA") on December 31, 1992
and July 30, 1993, respectively.
(2) Reflects the results of operations through the date of disposition of the
peripheral products and imaging products business units of Metrum on May
31, 1995 and June 6, 1995, respectively.
(3) Reflects the results of operations through the date of disposition of the
instrumentation products business unit of Metrum on February 9, 1996.
(4) Reflects the results of operations through the date of disposition of the
Latin American operations on June 30, 1997.
(5) Reflects the acquisition of PCA on July 30, 1993.
(6) Reflects the disposition of the peripheral products and imaging products
business units of Metrum on May 31, 1995 and June 6, 1995, respectively.
(7) Reflects the disposition of the instrumentation products business unit of
Metrum on February 9, 1996.
(8) Reflects the disposition of the Latin American operations on June 30, 1997.
8
<PAGE>
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Overview
GTC provides advanced manufacturing, engineering and testing services to
OEMs of electronic products and also to certain end users such as United States
government agencies. These services include the manufacture of circuit card
assemblies, subsystems and end-user products for use in a wide variety of
markets. In providing these services, GTC is affected by a number of internal
and external factors including, but not limited to, materials management and
availability, working capital needs, variability of customer requirements,
production start-up costs, industry trends and competition.
GTC's operating results are also dependent upon the efforts and abilities
of key managerial and technical employees and upon its ability to attract and
retain qualified employees. During 1996 and during the first quarter of 1997,
GTC experienced turnover of certain key employees, including its President and
Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of GTC.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain data from GTC's Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997
expressed as a percentage of revenue:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
------------------------
1995 1996 1997
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue...................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of operations........................... 98.4 97.0 99.0
----- ----- -----
Gross profit................................. 1.6 3.0 1.0
Selling, general and administrative expense.. 7.2 5.1 5.7
Research and development..................... 1.1 0.1 0.1
----- ----- -----
Operating loss............................... (6.7) (2.2) (4.8)
Interest expense............................. 1.1 1.3 1.0
Other expense (income)....................... 0.2 -- (3.1)
----- ----- -----
Loss before income taxes..................... (8.0) (3.5) (2.7)
Income taxes (benefit)....................... (1.5) 0.3 0.1
----- ----- -----
Net loss..................................... (6.5)% (3.8)% (2.8)%
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
Year Ended December 31, 1997 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1996
Revenue
Revenue decreased by 49.5% to $113.4 million for 1997, as compared to
$224.7 million for 1996. The net decrease in revenue of $111.3 million is
related to a decrease in the Tampa-based manufacturing and engineering services
operations of $64.2 million, a decrease in sales by GTC's Latin American
operations of $41.5 million and a decrease in GTC's name brand product line
revenue of $5.6 million.
The decreased customer demand and termination or completion of contracts
experienced by GTC principally reflects the change in out-sourcing strategies of
three customers, which resulted in a $39.2 million and $6.8 million reduction of
domestic and Latin American revenue, respectively, during 1997 as compared 1996.
One such customer utilized the contract manufacturing services of GTC on a
temporary basis while it increased its capacity to provide its manufacturing
services internally. The other two customers with a change in out-sourcing
strategy moved their manufacturing solutions overseas. After considering the
effect of these contract curtailments, GTC believes its existing customer base
and related
9
<PAGE>
contracts, together with additional customers GTC is pursuing, will provide
modest growth opportunities during the next twelve months. However, GTC cannot
make any assurances with regard to its ability to attract or retain new and
existing customers or that any related increase in volume or revenue will
significantly improve the results of operations or financial position of GTC.
Changes in customer demand and the completion of certain long-term contracts
collectively accounted for the remaining $25.0 million of the decrease in
domestic revenue in 1997 as compared to 1996.
GTC's Latin American operations contributed $16.9 million and $58.4 million
to revenue in 1997 and 1996 respectively. Revenue from GTC's Latin American
operations in 1997 as compared to 1996 decreased $41.5 million, principally
associated with the completion or curtailment of certain contracts during the
second half of 1996 and the first quarter of 1997 and GTC's divestiture of all
of its Latin American operations effective June 30, 1997, as more fully
described in Note 4 of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 1996 and 1997, the Latin American operations accounted for approximately
$1.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of the operating loss of GTC. While
a portion of those losses were attributable to costs allocated from the Tampa
headquarters, GTC expects the divestiture of the Latin American operations and
the corresponding reduction in operating costs attributable to the Latin
American operations will have an overall positive impact on operating income.
GTC has redirected its resources in order to successfully improve the quality
and profitability of its domestic operations. However, GTC cannot make any
assurances that its strategy to focus on its core domestic manufacturing and
engineering business will result in improved profitability. GTC's divestiture of
its name brand products business units during the first quarter of 1996
accounted for an additional $5.7 million of the decline in domestic revenue
during 1997. The name brand product revenue in 1996 includes contract claim
revenue of $4.1 million.
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased to $1.2 million for 1997, compared to $6.8 million
for 1996. The gross margin decreased to 1.0% in 1997 as compared to 3.0% in
1996. The net decrease of $5.6 million represents an increase in gross profit in
the Tampa-based manufacturing and engineering services operations of $1.7
million off-set by a decrease from GTC's Latin American operations of $2.5
million, and by a decrease associated with GTC's divestiture of name brand
product lines of $4.8 million. The name brand product line claim referred to
above contributed $4.1 million to 1996 gross profit.
The low gross profit in 1997 was also caused by low margin contracts and
cost overruns on certain contracts. During the third quarter of 1997, GTC
evaluated the status of certain loss contracts and recognized $0.8 million of
additional costs for these contracts. These costs arose during the third quarter
due to shortages of materials, delays in attaining certain contract milestones
and increased warranty estimates based on returned product. GTC also recorded,
in the third quarter of 1997, a provision for excess and obsolete inventories
totaling $0.6 million. This provision was recorded to reflect the aging of the
residual inventory resulting from contract terminations or curtailments and
GTC's unsuccessful efforts to fully recover certain costs from its customers.
GTC has modified its marketing strategies to focus on obtaining more profitable
contractual agreements to mitigate the effects of the low margin contracts.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense was $6.5 million or 5.7% of
revenue in 1997, as compared to $11.5 million or 5.1% of revenue for 1996.
The $5.0 million decrease in selling, general and administrative expense
during 1997 as compared to 1996 is principally attributable to the
aforementioned divestitures and an overall lower business volume. Additionally,
GTC experienced a lower level of warehouse relocation costs and provisions for
doubtful accounts receivable during 1997 which accounted for a reduction in
selling, general and administrative expense of $0.8 million and $0.7 million,
respectively. With regard to warehouse relocation costs, in the second quarter
of 1996, GTC implemented a cost saving strategy to integrate the materials
warehousing function into its main Tampa facility. During the second quarter of
1996, GTC initially estimated that costs
10
<PAGE>
associated with this strategy would amount to $0.4 million, comprised of
planning and interior demolition costs, labor associated with the move of the
warehouse function to the main facility, the impairment of existing leasehold
improvements in the warehouse and estimated lease obligations net of estimated
sublease revenue. GTC later revised this estimate to $0.9 million in the fourth
quarter of 1996 principally to reflect additional costs associated with moving
the warehouse function and the inability to secure a subtenant at favorable
lease rates. During the third quarter of 1997, GTC again assessed the
probability of subleasing the space at favorable rates and increased the
provision for the warehouse relocation by $0.1 million to a total of $1.0
million. The provision for doubtful accounts in 1997 and 1996 of $0.3 million
and $1.0 million, respectively, represented a change in estimate of
collectibility following extensive communications with the respective customers
regarding non-payment of invoices and conclusions or settlements reached during
the period regarding ultimate collectibility. Additional reductions in selling,
general and administrative expense are associated with cost saving initiatives
implemented in 1996 and 1997, including workforce reductions.
Research and Development
Research and development expense for 1997 and 1996 was $0.1 million and
$0.3 million, respectively. GTC's manufacturing and engineering services
businesses currently require low levels of research and development.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $1.1 million or 1.0% of revenue in 1997, as compared
to $2.9 million or 1.3% of revenue in 1996. GTC's reduced level of operations
has required a lower level of working capital and, therefore, reduced debt
requirements. Additionally, on June 30, 1997 GTC utilized the proceeds from the
sale of its Latin American operations to repay its debt with its principal
lender.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense of $0.2 million in 1997 is primarily attributable to
GTC's international operations. GTC has exhausted the benefits of any income tax
loss carrybacks and has recorded a valuation allowance for all temporary
differences and income tax loss carryforwards.
Year Ended December 31, 1996 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1995
Revenue
Revenue decreased by 17.9% to $224.7 million for 1996, as compared to
$273.6 million for 1995. The net decrease in revenue of $48.9 million is related
to the decrease in GTC's name brand product line revenue of $31.2 million (net
of contract claim revenue recognized in 1996 of $4.1 million) and a decrease in
the Tampa-based manufacturing and engineering services operations of $36.1
million, partially offset by an increase in sales by GTC's international EMS
operations of $18.4 million.
The decrease in name brand product line revenue results from the
disposition of substantially all of the assets of Metrum and GTC's Badger
business. These dispositions, which occurred during 1995 and 1996, are more
fully discussed under the caption "Dispositions of Assets" included herein
below. The decrease in the name brand products revenues was partially offset by
the successful settlement of a $4.1 million name brand product contract claim
during the second quarter of 1996.
The Tampa manufacturing services business continued to suffer from
underutilized capacity. A large government contract was completed late in 1994
and orders on two commercial contracts were reduced during 1995 due to the
customers' need to reduce their inventory levels. GTC also lost opportunities
with two commercial customers due to a change in outsourcing strategies which
resulted in the loss of a significant level of planned business. During 1996,
GTC's domestic operations also experienced the impact of reduced demand from
certain semiconductor industry customers and also
11
<PAGE>
suffered from increased facility underutilization related to certain contract
terminations. In an effort to mitigate the impact of these reduced contract
requirements, management implemented cost reduction strategies and increased its
Tampa marketing efforts on high mix/low volume and advanced packaging services.
GTC's Latin American manufacturing services business grew significantly
during 1995 and 1996. GTC entered into a manufacturing services agreement in
July 1995 to provide contract manufacturing services in Brazil to GTC's largest
commercial customer, IBM. The Brazilian operation began contributing to revenue
and operating profit during the third quarter of 1995. During 1996, GTC's
presence in Brazil expanded as a result of the start-up of a second Brazilian
facility. While GTC also fostered growth at its Mexican facility during 1995,
certain Mexican-based contracts were terminated during 1996, creating
underutilized capacity at that facility. In response to this underutilized
capacity, GTC retained new marketing management and increased its high volume
manufacturing marketing efforts.
To enhance GTC's prospects for achieving an adequate revenue load in future
periods, management structured the marketing and sales function to optimize
GTC's capabilities at each of its manufacturing facilities. The marketing
efforts for GTC's domestic, Mexican and Brazilian manufacturing services
operations were focused on high mix/low volume and advanced packaging, high
volume manufacturing, and box build services, respectively.
The overall decrease in revenue during 1996 resulted in significant work
force reductions during the year of approximately 36%. These reductions resulted
in decreased direct and indirect costs associated with both international and
domestic operations including decreases in employee benefit plan expenses. The
impact of the decreased work force is considered in the following analyses of
gross profit and selling, general and administrative expense.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased to $6.8 million for 1996, compared to $4.5 million
for 1995. The gross margin increased to 3.0% in 1996 as compared to 1.6% in
1995. The net increase of $2.3 million represents an increase in gross profit in
the Tampa-based manufacturing and engineering services operations of $9.0
million and an increase from increased sales by GTC's Latin American operations
of $1.4 million, partially offset by a decrease associated with GTC's
divestiture of name brand product lines of $8.1 million. The name brand product
line claim referred to above contributed $4.1 million to 1996 gross profit.
Therefore, adjusting for the effect of this claim, the gross margin percentage
in 1996 remained relatively consistent with the 1995 percentage. Included in the
costs of operations in 1996 are costs amounting to $7.4 million which are more
fully discussed below.
GTC's ability to generate the expected level of profitability on contracts
is highly dependent on its ability to effectively manage materials. GTC
recognized inventory adjustments of $3.6 million, including $1.7 million related
to two contract terminations during the year and $1.9 million related to
excessive domestic and foreign scrap and related physical inventory adjustments,
including fourth quarter physical inventory adjustments totaling $1.0 million.
The $1.0 million inventory adjustment in the fourth quarter of 1996 was
comprised of a $0.3 million domestic adjustment and a $0.7 million Latin
American adjustment (Mexico City facility). GTC performed domestic and
international physical inventory counts during July 1996 and August 1996,
respectively, to ensure that any excess shrinkage was identified timely.
Therefore, management determined that the $1.0 million adjustment was
principally associated with the fourth quarter of 1996.
As a result of the inventory adjustments recorded in the fourth quarters of
1995 and 1996, GTC developed new internal controls and enhanced existing
internal controls, including refinement of accrued inventory receipts reports,
increased cycle count activity, increased monitoring of scrap and shrinkage
rates and utilization of a third party warehousing and freight forwarding
service (for its Mexico City operation). GTC will continue to evaluate its
inventory control and physical inventory count procedures to minimize the risk
of material adjustments in the future.
12
<PAGE>
Management also evaluated the profitability of certain long-term contracts
and recorded costs associated with changes in contract estimates of loss
contracts of $1.0 million during the second quarter of 1996 and $0.8 million in
the fourth quarter. Other estimate changes on long-term contracts were also
recognized during 1996. These estimate changes principally resulted from GTC's
inability to achieve expected labor costs or material costs during the year.
During 1996, GTC also recognized charges associated with asset disposals and
retirements of $0.9 million and amortization of lease payments due at the end of
the respective lease terms of $0.5 million. The $0.9 million charge for asset
disposals and retirements resulted from a fourth quarter review of GTC's fixed
assets, in which certain assets were not readily identifiable or were deemed to
be surplus as a result of the corresponding reduction in GTC's operations. The
$0.5 million charge for lease payments reflected the inception-to-date
amortization of end-of-lease payments for certain leases which originated during
1994. Severance costs also negatively impacted gross margin by $0.4 million in
1996.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense was $11.5 million or 5.1% of
revenue in 1996, as compared to $19.7 million or 7.2% of revenue for 1995. This
decrease principally represented a $6.2 million reduction of costs associated
with the sale of substantially all of the assets of Metrum. Decreased
administrative expenses also resulted from continued cost reduction initiatives
including work force reductions during 1996. Cost reduction activities
implemented at various times during 1995 contributed to the significant cost
reductions realized in 1996 as compared to the full year ended December 31,
1995. These reductions offset the impact of $1.4 million of costs in 1996,
including severance costs of $0.5 million and costs incurred for the expected
closure of a Tampa warehouse of $0.9 million.
With regard to warehouse costs, in the second quarter of 1996, GTC
implemented a cost saving strategy to integrate the materials warehousing
function into its main Tampa facility. The total cost of the move was originally
estimated to be $0.4 million, but an increased cost of $0.5 million was recorded
in the fourth quarter based on actual costs incurred and the review of
additional information regarding sublease strategies.
Selling, general and administrative expense also included $1.0 million of
provisions for doubtful accounts receivable, as compared to $1.3 million
recognized in 1995. The provision for doubtful accounts in both 1995 and 1996
represented a change in estimate of collectibility following extensive
communications with the respective customers regarding non-payment of invoices
and conclusions or settlements reached during the year regarding ultimate
collectibility.
Research and Development
Research and development expense was $0.3 million or 0.1% of revenue in
1996, as compared to $3.0 million or 1.1% of revenue for 1995. The decrease
reflects the fact that GTC's research and development efforts have historically
been concentrated on the divested name brand products business units. GTC's
manufacturing and engineering services businesses are expected to continue to
require limited levels of research and development in the future.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $2.9 million or 1.3% of revenue in 1996, as compared
to $2.9 million or 1.1% of revenue in 1995. Interest expense remained relatively
constant with 1995 levels despite a significant reduction in outstanding debt
during 1996. The increased interest rate is partly attributable to the
amortization of warrants issued in the first quarter of 1996 in connection with
an amended and restated credit facility. The increased interest rate also
results from a higher weighted average interest rate incurred in the second half
of 1995 and throughout 1996 on GTC's principal credit facility.
13
<PAGE>
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense of $0.8 million in 1996 is primarily attributable to
GTC's international operations and Metrum state taxes payable. While an income
tax benefit of $4.0 million was recognized in 1995, as of December 31, 1995, GTC
had substantially exhausted the benefits of any income tax loss carrybacks. Also
as of December 31, 1996, GTC has recorded a valuation allowance for all
temporary differences and income tax loss carryforwards.
Dispositions of Assets
Beginning in 1995, management focused its attention toward the actions
necessary to return GTC's core manufacturing services business to profitability.
Management believed that the focus of GTC's human and financial resources should
be directed to its core business and, therefore, made decisions during 1995 to
begin the divestiture of substantially all of GTC's line of name brand products.
Another factor considered by management in reaching its decision to divest these
operations was GTC's need to reduce its outstanding debt under its revolving
credit agreement, which resulted in part from non-compliance with its credit
agreement. These divestitures, which were completed during the first quarter of
1996, were followed by GTC's divestiture of its Latin American operations on
June 30, 1997.
GTC's product offerings historically included a line of name brand
products. All sales of GTC's Metrum subsidiary were considered name brand
products, namely computer peripheral products, digital color imaging products
and instrumentation recording products. GTC also marketed a line of ruggedized
computers under the Badger tradename. Management successfully completed sale
transactions for substantially all of the assets of the peripherals products and
imaging products businesses during the second quarter of 1995 and the
instrumentation products and Badger products businesses during the first quarter
of 1996. The aggregate sales price of the name brand products businesses was
approximately $18.0 million, which was paid with $16.4 million in cash and a
note receivable of $1.6 million. GTC retained approximately $2.4 million in
liabilities associated with the Metrum business, which liabilities related
primarily to certain employee benefits, accrued income taxes and commissions.
GTC retained certain warranty obligations of the Badger product in addition to
performance obligations under a contract with a customer who is in competition
with the buyer of the assets. GTC recorded charges of $0.2 million and $0.3
million to cost of operations and other expense, respectively, during the second
quarter of 1995 related to the Metrum divestitures and a $2.2 million charge to
cost of operations during the fourth quarter of 1995 to write down its Badger
inventories to the negotiated sale price. During 1996 and 1997, respectively,
GTC recorded a $0.6 million and $1.5 million increase in capital related to the
first quarter 1996 instrumentation products divestiture.
Revenue from GTC's name brand products line, in the aggregate, typically
generated higher gross profit margins than revenue from GTC's manufacturing and
engineering services. However, the development of name brand products and the
maintenance and growth of the market position of these name brand products
require significantly higher amounts of research and development and selling,
general and administrative expenditures than are required by GTC's manufacturing
and engineering services.
On June 30, 1997, GTC sold to SCI Systems, Inc., SCI Systems De Mexico S.A.
de C.V. and SCI Holdings, Inc. (collectively, "SCI"), all of GTC's investment in
the capital stock and/or equity interests of three of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Group Technologies S.A. de C.V., Group Technologies Suprimentos de
Informatica Industia E Comercio Ltda., and Group Technologies Integraoes em
Electronica Ltda. These three subsidiaries comprised all of GTC's Latin
American operations. GTC also sold or assigned to SCI certain assets
principally used in or useful to the operations being sold, including accounts
receivable, inventory, equipment, accounts payable and equipment leases. The
initial sales price of the aforementioned assets amounted to $18,000,000 in cash
and the assumption by SCI of certain liabilities. Pursuant to procedures
described in the purchase and sale agreement, the price is subject to subsequent
adjustment, upward or downward, based upon, among other things, the value of the
net assets of GTC's Latin American operations at June 29, 1997. GTC expects to
repay $2,914,000 of the initial sales price to SCI, subject to a final
determination to be made in accordance with the purchase and sale agreement.
GTC recognized a gain
14
<PAGE>
of $3,200,000 during the three month period ended September 28, 1997, after
giving consideration to GTC's recorded liability and expected repayment of
$2,914,000, relative to this disposition.
Foreign Currency
In addition to its domestic operations, GTC provided manufacturing services
in Brazil and Mexico through June 30, 1997. Foreign currency transaction gains
and losses in Latin America have generally not been significant.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash used in operating activities was $5.6 million in 1997, while cash
provided by operating activities was $7.7 million in 1996. The principal
reasons for the cash used by operations during 1997 include advance procurement
of inventory to meet customer forecast requirements and a reduction in the
number of days accounts payable were outstanding. These reductions in cash were
partially off-set by a significant reduction of accounts receivable attributable
to both a lower level of operations and increased collection efforts by GTC.
The principal contributors to the positive operating cash flow in 1996 include
recognition and collection of a name brand products claim, collection of income
tax refunds, collection of accounts receivable and reduced inventory levels.
Significant cash payments reducing accounts payable served to partially off-set
the positive contributing items in 1996. At the end of 1995, GTC was
substantially beyond its payment terms with its suppliers. While GTC continued
to extend its payments beyond normal terms, a significant effort was made during
1996 and 1997 to reduce the days accounts payable were outstanding, contributing
to the overall reduction in accounts payable. GTC has long-term relationships
with a majority of its suppliers and as a result, has been successful in
continuing to work on reasonable credit terms with its supplier base.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $16.8 million and $8.2
million in 1997 and 1996, respectively. Capital expenditures in 1997 and 1996
were $1.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively. GTC's investments in
manufacturing equipment in both 1997 and 1996 were required to expand its Latin
American capacity, maintain its competitive position and respond to
technological changes. GTC expects its capital expenditures in 1998 to be
somewhat higher than 1997 levels to remain competitive and to continue to
respond to technological changes. The divestiture of GTC's Latin American
operations during 1997 and GTC's name brand product lines during 1996 generated
net proceeds of approximately $18.0 million and $11.6 million, respectively.
Net cash used in financing activities was $8.8 million and $17.4 million
during 1997 and 1996, respectively. During both 1997 and 1996, GTC significantly
reduced debt outstanding on its primary credit agreement and other debt.
Additionally, GFP invested $2.5 million in redeemable and convertible Preferred
Stock in 1997 and $1.0 million in common stock during 1996.
On March 29, 1996, the Company entered into a financing agreement (the
"Credit Agreement") with its bank to replace a prior debt instrument. The Credit
Agreement provided the Company with a revolving line of credit facility (the
"Revolver"), a $3,300,000 two-year facility (the "Term Note") and an additional
$5,000,000 facility (the "1996 Note"). Borrowings under the Credit Agreement
were secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The Company was
provided credit availability on the Revolver equal to the lesser of $27,500,000
or the applicable amount of its eligible accounts receivable and inventories.
The Credit Agreement was further amended on March 28, 1997 to reduce credit
availability on the Revolver to an amount equal to the lesser of $13,500,000 or
the applicable amount of its eligible accounts receivable and inventories
through June 30, 1997. On June 30, 1997, the Company used proceeds from the
sale of its Latin American operations to fully repay all loans and the Credit
Agreement was terminated.
15
<PAGE>
In connection with execution of the Credit Agreement on March 29, 1996, GFP
invested $1.0 million in GTC in exchange for 374,531 shares of GTC's Common
Stock and GTC issued warrants to the lender for purchase of 1,200,000 shares of
GTC's Common Stock for $.01 per share. Of the 1,200,000 warrants, 200,000 became
exercisable at closing and 125,000 became exercisable on March 31, 1997. As a
result of GTC repaying all amounts payable under the Credit Agreement on June
30, 1997, the lender forfeited the remaining 875,000 warrants.
In connection with the March 28, 1997 amendment to the Credit Agreement,
GFP invested $2.5 million in GTC in exchange for 250,000 shares of Preferred
Stock. The Preferred Stock pays quarterly dividends of 8.5% per annum and is
redeemable at the option of the holder upon repayment by GTC of all of its
outstanding Credit Agreement indebtedness. The Preferred Stock is also
convertible and each share may be exchanged for 8.1 shares of GTC's Common
Stock. In connection with the Merger, GFP intends to exercise its conversion
rights on or about March 30, 1998.
On November 14, 1997, GTC, GFP, and several majority-owned subsidiaries of
GFP entered into a credit agreement with a bank. The agreement provides the
parties with shared access to total credit availability of $45 million,
including a $30 million revolving credit loan and a $15 million term loan. The
revolving credit loan matures on September 30, 2002. The term loan matures in
quarterly installments commencing with a $500,000 payment on December 31, 1997,
and quarterly payments of $750,000 thereafter and through September 30, 2002
when a final payment of $1.0 million is due. Revolving credit availability may
be used on a shared basis for the general corporate purposes of GTC and the
other GFP subsidiaries and for ordinary operating expenses of GFP. Since the
inception of this credit agreement, GTC has not drawn upon the credit facility.
GTC believes that sufficient resources, including resources to be provided by
this financing and resources expected to be provided by operations will be
available to meet its cash requirements through the next twelve months. If such
resources otherwise prove insufficient to provide GTC with adequate funding for
its working capital, management will undertake actions to mitigate the effect of
such deficiencies. Such actions could consist of financing initiatives,
potential asset sales, and other actions relative to maximizing the liquidity of
GTC's financial resources. Cash requirements for periods beyond the next twelve
months depend on GTC's profitability, its ability to manage working capital
requirements and its growth rate.
Impact of Year 2000
Some of GTC's older computer programs were written using two digits rather
than four to define the applicable year. As a result, those computer programs
have time-sensitive software that recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900
rather than the year 2000. This could cause a system failure or miscalculations
causing disruptions of operations, including, among other things, a temporary
inability to process transactions, send invoices, or engage in similar normal
business activities.
GTC has completed an assessment and will have to modify or replace portions
of its software so that its computer systems will function properly with respect
to dates in the year 2000 and thereafter. The total year 2000 project cost for
the purchase of new software is not expected to be material. To date, GTC has
incurred minor expenses, primarily for assessment of the year 2000 issue and the
development of a modification plan and purchase of new software.
The project is estimated to be completed not later than December 31, 1999,
which is prior to any anticipated impact on its operating systems. GTC believes
that, with modifications to existing software and conversions to new software,
the year 2000 issue will not pose significant operational problems for its
computer systems. However, if such modifications and conversions are not made,
or are not completed timely, the year 2000 issue could have a material impact on
the operations of GTC.
GTC has solicited information from all of its significant suppliers and
large customers in order to assess their plans for addressing year 2000 issues.
There is no guarantee that such parties will address year 2000 issues in a
manner that will have no adverse effect on the ability to interface with GTC's
systems.
16
<PAGE>
The costs of the project and the date on which GTC believes it will
complete the year 2000 modifications are based on management's best estimates,
which were derived utilizing numerous assumptions of future events, including
the continued availability of certain resources and other factors. Based upon
these estimates, management does not believe that the costs of completing the
year 2000 modifications will have a material adverse effect on the Company's
results of operations or financial position. However, there can be no guarantee
that these estimates will be achieved and actual results could differ materially
from those anticipated. Specific factors that might cause such material
differences include, but are not limited to, the availability and cost of
personnel trained in this area, the ability to locate and correct all relevant
computer codes, and similar uncertainties.
Planned Merger
On March 16, 1998, the shareholders of GTC voted in favor of the Merger and
the reincorporation of GTC in Delaware to be accomplished by GTC's merger with
and into Sypris Solutions, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of GTC. The effective
date of the transactions is expected to be on or about March 30, 1998 at which
time the combined company will be known as Sypris Solutions, Inc. and will be
headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky.
17
<PAGE>
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants.. 19
Consolidated Balance Sheets......................... 20
Consolidated Statements of Operations............... 21
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity..... 22
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows............... 23
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.......... 24
</TABLE>
18
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Group Technologies Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Group
Technologies Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 14(a).
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Group Technologies Corporation at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and
the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tampa, Florida
March 6, 1998
19
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------------
1996 1997
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.............. $ 661 $ 3,090
Accounts receivable, net............... 22,754 11,231
Inventories, net....................... 20,220 21,895
Other current assets................... 2,102 2,861
------- -------
Total current assets................. 45,737 39,077
Property and equipment, net............. 21,206 8,281
Other assets............................ 522 6
------- -------
$67,465 $47,364
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable....................... $17,969 $ 8,504
Accrued liabilities.................... 16,416 18,316
Current portion of long-term debt...... 3,513 198
------- -------
Total current liabilities............ 37,898 27,018
Long-term debt.......................... 10,119 --
Other liabilities....................... 45 --
------- -------
Total liabilities.................... 48,062 27,018
Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable preferred stock, $.01 par
value, 1,000,000 shares authorized;
250,000 shares issued and outstanding
in 1997................................ -- 3
Additional paid-in capital --
preferred stock........................ -- 2,497
Shareholders' equity:
Common Stock, $.01 par value,
40,000,000 shares authorized;
16,220,629 and 16,233,861 shares
issued and outstanding in 1996 and
1997, respectively................... 162 162
Additional paid-in capital............. 24,675 26,314
Retained deficit........................ (5,434) (8,630)
------- -------
Total shareholders' equity.............. 19,403 17,846
------- -------
$67,465 $47,364
======= =======
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
20
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except for per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
-------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue........................................ $273,647 $224,661 $113,356
Cost of operations............................. 269,150 217,890 112,202
-------- -------- --------
Gross profit.............................. 4,497 6,771 1,154
Selling, general and administrative expense.... 19,683 11,453 6,504
Research and development....................... 3,041 299 99
-------- -------- --------
Operating loss............................ (18,227) (4,981) (5,449)
Interest expense............................... 2,907 2,858 1,069
Other expense (income)......................... 521 (59) (3,474)
-------- -------- --------
Loss before income taxes.................. (21,655) (7,780) (3,044)
Income taxes................................... (3,982) 799 152
-------- -------- --------
Net loss.................................. $(17,673) $ (8,579) $ (3,196)
======== ======== ========
Net loss per share:
Basic..................................... $ (1.13) $ (0.53) $ (0.20)
Diluted................................... $ (1.13) $ (0.53) $ (0.20)
Shares used in computing per share amounts:
Basic..................................... 15,695 16,157 16,224
Diluted................................... 15,695 16,157 16,224
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
21
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except for share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock Additional Retained
---------------------- Paid-In Earnings Shareholders'
Shares Amount Capital (Deficit) Equity
---------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1994.................... 15,626,547 $ 156 $ 21,825 $ 20,818 $ 42,799
Common stock issued and issuable................ 202,160 2 712 -- 714
Net loss........................................ -- -- -- (17,673) (17,673)
---------- --------- ---------- -------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1995.................... 15,828,707 158 22,537 3,145 25,840
Common stock issued............................. 391,922 4 1,045 -- 1,049
Warrants issued................................. -- -- 480 -- 480
Capital contribution............................ -- -- 613 -- 613
Net loss........................................ -- -- -- (8,579) (8,579)
---------- --------- ---------- -------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1996.................... 16,220,629 162 24,675 (5,434) 19,403
Common stock issued............................. 13,232 -- 67 -- 67
Warrants issued................................. -- -- 118 -- 118
Capital contribution............................ -- -- 1,454 -- 1,454
Net loss........................................ -- -- -- (3,196) (3,196)
---------- --------- ---------- --------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1997.................... 16,233,861 $ 162 $ 26,314 $ (8,630) $ 17,846
========== ========= ========== ========= =============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
22
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
-----------------------------
1995 1996 1997
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss....................................................................................... $(17,673) $ (8,579) $(3,196)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization............................................................ 5,596 5,214 3,782
Deferred income taxes.................................................................... 741 251 --
Provision for inactive, obsolete and unsalable inventories............................... 6,939 3,567 1,192
Provision for doubtful accounts.......................................................... 1,293 961 303
Provision for idle leased equipment...................................................... 1,104 -- --
Other.................................................................................... 778 1,134 (2,882)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of acquisitions and dispositions:
Accounts receivable.................................................................. 1,875 4,195 6,800
Inventories.......................................................................... 3,287 15,497 (7,020)
Other current and non-current assets................................................. (3,752) 4,737 228
Accounts payable..................................................................... 8,043 (18,872) (5,355)
Accrued and other liabilities........................................................ 1,183 (389) 506
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities................................ 9,414 7,716 (5,642)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures........................................................................... (8,042) (3,408) (1,159)
Proceeds from disposal of assets............................................................... 5,214 11,561 18,000
-------- -------- --------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities................................ (2,828) 8,153 16,841
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net repayments under line of credit agreement.................................................. (4,667) (10,418) (6,934)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock...................................................... -- -- 2,500
Repayments of long-term debt................................................................... (1,505) (7,933) (4,403)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock..................................................... 401 1,000 67
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used in financing activities.............................................. (5,771) (17,351) (8,770)
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents............................................. 815 (1,482) 2,429
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year................................................... 1,328 2,143 661
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year......................................................... $ 2,143 $ 661 $ 3,090
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
23
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Business
Group Technologies Corporation (the "Company") was incorporated on December
27, 1988 as a subsidiary of Group Financial Partners, Inc. (the "Parent"), a
private holding company. The Parent owns approximately 80% of the outstanding
Common Stock of the Company.
The Company provides advanced manufacturing, engineering and testing
services to original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") of electronic products.
The Company custom manufactures complex circuit card assemblies, subsystems and
end-user products for use in a wide variety of markets, including automotive,
commercial avionics, computer, government systems, industrial electronics,
networking, space, and telecommunications.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its majority owned subsidiaries (hereinafter collectively referred to as the
"Company"). See Note 4 for discussion of recent dispositions.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Inventories
Contract inventories are stated at actual production costs, reduced by the
cost of units for which revenue has been recognized. Gross contract inventories
are considered work in process. Progress payments under long-term contracts are
specified in the contracts as a percentage of cost and are liquidated as
contract items are completed and shipped. Other inventories are stated at lower
of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the lease term using the straight-line method. Machinery,
equipment, furniture and fixtures are depreciated over their estimated economic
lives (three to ten years).
Amortization
Noncompete agreements are amortized over five years and patents and other
intangible assets are amortized over their composite economic life of seven
years, using the straight-line method. The excess of the fair value of the net
assets of an acquired business over the purchase price of such net assets
(negative goodwill) is amortized using the straight-line method over five years.
As a result of the disposition of substantially all of Metrum's assets during
1995 and 1996, there was no negative goodwill remaining at December 31, 1996 or
1997.
24
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Contract Revenue Recognition
A portion of the Company's business is conducted under long-term fixed-
price contracts with OEMs, the United States government and its prime
contractors. Contract revenue is included in the statement of operations as
units are completed and shipped using the units of delivery, percentage of
completion method of accounting. The costs attributed to contract revenue are
based upon the estimated average costs of all units to be shipped. The
cumulative average costs of units shipped to date is adjusted through current
operations as estimates of future costs to complete change (see Contract
Accounting).
Revenue recognized under the percentage of completion method of accounting
totaled to $57,945,000, $54,397,000 and $47,887,000 in 1995, 1996 and 1997,
respectively. Substantially all such amounts were accounted for under the units
of delivery method. All other revenue is recognized as product is shipped and
title passes.
Contract Accounting
For long-term contracts, the Company capitalizes in inventory direct
material, direct labor and factory overhead as incurred. The Company also
capitalizes certain general and administrative costs for estimating and bidding
on contracts awarded (of which approximately $210,000 remained in inventory at
December 31, 1996 and 1997). Selling costs are expensed as incurred. Costs to
complete long-term contracts are estimated on a monthly basis. Estimated margins
at completion are applied to cumulative contract revenue to arrive at costs
charged to operations.
Accounting for long-term contracts under the percentage of completion
method involves substantial estimation processes, including determining the
estimated cost to complete a contract. As contracts may require performance over
several accounting periods, formal detailed cost to complete estimates are
performed which are updated monthly via performance reports. Management's
estimates of costs to complete change due to internal and external factors such
as labor rate and efficiency variances, revised estimates of warranty costs,
estimated future material prices and customer specification and testing
requirement changes. Changes in estimated costs are reflected in gross profit in
the period in which they are known. If increases in projected costs to complete
are sufficient to create a loss contract, the entire estimated loss is charged
to operations in the period the loss first becomes known. Provisions for losses
on firm fixed-price contracts amounted to $700,000, $2,327,000 and $1,600,000 in
1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively.
During the second quarter of 1996, the Company successfully settled a name
brand products contract claim and recognized revenue and income before income
taxes of approximately $4,100,000 associated with that settlement.
Research and Development
Company sponsored research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes
The Company and its domestic subsidiaries were included in the consolidated
federal income tax return of the Parent from the Company's inception through
March 22, 1995. Effective March 23, 1995, as a result of a decrease in the
Parent's ownership percentage of the Company, the Company did not meet the 80-
percent-voting power and value requirements defined by the Internal Revenue Code
for affiliated group membership and ceased to be an includable member of the
Parent's affiliated group. The Company and its domestic subsidiaries separately
filed its initial consolidated federal income tax return for the period March
23, 1995 through December 31, 1995. Effective March 29, 1996, as a result of an
increase in the Parent's ownership percentage of the Company, the Company again
met the 80-percent-voting power and value requirements defined by the Internal
Revenue Code for affiliated group membership and again became an includable
member of the Parent's affiliated group beginning March 29, 1996.
25
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
For financial reporting purposes during the tax periods in which the
Company is or expects to be included in the Parent's consolidated federal income
tax return, income taxes are accounted for on a separate return basis, including
deferred income taxes. For those tax periods, liabilities for, or refunds of,
federal income taxes were calculated on a stand-alone basis and were payable to,
or receivable from, the Parent.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist of accounts receivable. The Company's OEM
customer base consists primarily of large electronic manufacturers and its
commercial accounts receivable are concentrated with a few of these large
companies. Although the Company is directly affected by the condition of the
computer and electronics industry, management does not believe significant
credit risk exists at December 31, 1997.
The Company earned revenue from the United States government and its
agencies of approximately $53,643,000 (20% of revenue), $38,635,000 (17% of
revenue) and $30,943,000 (27% of revenue) during 1995, 1996 and 1997,
respectively. The Company also served as a subcontractor to a variety of prime
contractors under contract with the federal government, which in the aggregate,
represented approximately 9%, 12% and 13% of the Company's revenue in 1995, 1996
and 1997, respectively. The Company's largest commercial customer was IBM which
represented approximately 16%, 16% and 19% of the Company's revenue in 1995,
1996 and 1997, respectively. Sales to International Game Technology represented
approximately 10% of the Company's revenue in 1996. Sales to Kulicke and Soffa
Industries represented approximately 12% of the Company's revenue in 1997. No
other single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's revenue in
1995, 1996 or 1997.
Foreign Currency Translation
The United States dollar was the functional currency for the Company's
formerly owned GTC Mexico and GTC Brazil subsidiaries. Foreign currency
transaction gains and losses, which are insignificant in all years presented,
are included in determining net income.
Net Loss Per Share
Net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of issued
and issuable common shares outstanding. Additionally, attributable to the
antidilutive effect of common stock equivalents during 1995 and 1996, the
Company's adoption of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, "Earnings Per
Share" did not affect the previously reported loss per share or shares
outstanding data. The computation of diluted net loss per share was antidilutive
during the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997; therefore, the number
of shares used for computing basic and diluted loss per share are the same.
(3) Acquisitions
On July 18, 1995, GTC Brazil acquired certain manufacturing equipment of
IBM Brasil-Industria, Maquinas e Sevicos Ltda. ("IBM Brasil"). The transaction
was accounted for as a purchase in which the purchase price of $4,900,000, in
the form of a note payable to the seller, was allocated based on fair values of
assets acquired. No goodwill resulted from this transaction. The 1995
consolidated statement of operations includes amounts for GTC Brazil from July
18, 1995.
This acquisition did not have a significant effect on the Company's results
of operations in 1995.
(4) Dispositions
The Company completed two transactions during 1995 and one transaction on
February 9, 1996, which, in the aggregate, resulted in the sale of substantially
all of the assets of its Metrum Inc. ("Metrum") subsidiary. On May 31, 1995, the
assets of the peripherals products business unit of Metrum were sold to
MountainGate Data Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation for
$5,247,000, consisting of cash of $3,655,000 and a note receivable from the
buyer of $1,592,000. On June 6, 1995, the assets of the
26
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
imaging business unit of Metrum were sold to Sienna Imaging, Inc. for $1,331,000
cash. On February 9, 1996, the assets of the instrumentation products business
unit of Metrum were sold to Bell Technologies, Inc. ("Bell"), also a subsidiary
of the Parent, for $10,104,000 cash and an earn-out provision which provides for
additional payments to the Company, up to $3,000,000, in the event annual
earnings before interest and taxes exceeds defined amounts through December 31,
2000. The sales price for each 1995 transaction approximated the net book value
of the respective business units on the date of sale. The sales price for the
February 9, 1996 transaction exceeded the net book value of assets and
liabilities transferred by $613,000. The proceeds from the sale transactions
were used to reduce the Company's debt balance and to fund working capital
needs. Revenue, net income and net income per share for Metrum were $31,268,000,
$2,348,000 and $0.15, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1995.
Due to the common ownership interest of the Parent in the Company and Bell,
the Company requested and obtained an independent opinion, which indicated that
the consideration received by the Company for the sale of the instrumentation
products business was fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated
shareholders of the Company. In addition, due to the common ownership, the
amount by which the sales price exceeds the net book value of assets and
liabilities transferred of $613,000 and amounts earned during 1997 under the
terms of the earn-out provision of $1,454,000 were recorded by the Company as a
contribution to its capital.
On March 22, 1996, the Company sold substantially all of the assets related
to its Badger line of name brand products. The Company recorded a $2,200,000
charge to cost of operations during the fourth quarter of 1995 to reduce Badger
inventory to the sale price.
On June 30, 1997, the Company sold to SCI Systems, Inc., SCI Systems De
Mexico S.A. de C.V. and SCI Holdings, Inc. (collectively, "SCI"), all of the
Company's investment in the capital stock and/or equity interests of three of
its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Group Technologies S.A. de C.V., Group
Technologies Suprimentos de Informatica Industia E Comercio Ltda., and Group
Technologies Integraoes em Electronica Ltda. These three subsidiaries comprised
all of the Company's Latin American operations. The Company also sold or
assigned to SCI certain assets principally used in or useful to the operations
being sold, including accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, accounts
payable and equipment leases. The initial sales price of the aforementioned
assets amounted to $18,000,000 in cash and the assumption by SCI of certain
liabilities. Pursuant to procedures described in the purchase and sale
agreement, the price is subject to subsequent adjustment, upward or downward,
based upon, among other things, the value of the net assets of the Company's
Latin American operations at June 29, 1997. The Company expects to repay
$2,914,000 of the initial sales price to SCI, subject to a final determination
to be made in accordance with the purchase and sale agreement. The Company
recognized a gain of $3,200,000 after giving consideration to the Company's
recorded liability and expected repayment of $2,914,000, relative to this
disposition.
(5) Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------
1996 1997
---- ----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Commercial customers........................ $20,237 $ 9,838
United States government.................... 3,763 1,904
------- -------
24,000 11,742
Allowance for doubtful accounts............. (1,246) (511)
------- -------
$22,754 $11,231
======= =======
</TABLE>
Accounts receivable from the United States government includes amounts due
under long-term contracts, which are all billed, at December 31, 1996 and 1997
of $2,463,000 and $1,144,000, respectively.
27
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
The provision for doubtful accounts was $1,293,000, $961,000 and $303,000 for
the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively.
(6) Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1997
-------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials...................................................... $12,538 $ 8,514
Work in process.................................................... 4,100 4,514
Finished goods..................................................... 107 --
Costs relating to long-term contracts and programs, net of
amounts attributed to revenue recognized to date................. 11,655 17,729
Progress payments related to long-term contracts and programs...... (3,292) (5,189)
Reserve for inactive, obsolete and unsalable inventory............. (4,888) (3,673)
------- -------
$20,220 $21,895
======= =======
</TABLE>
Provisions for inactive, obsolete and unsalable inventories were
$6,939,000, $3,567,000 and $1,192,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995,
1996 and 1997, respectively.
(7) Other Current Assets
Other current assets consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1997
-------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Refundable income taxes............................................ $ 744 $ 330
Earn-out receivable................................................ -- 1,454
Other.............................................................. 1,358 1,077
------ ------
$2,102 $2,861
====== ======
</TABLE>
As more fully discussed in Note 17, the earn-out receivable of $1,454,000
is receivable from a related party and is associated with the sale of a business
during 1996.
(8) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1997
-------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Leasehold improvements................................................ $ 6,426 $ 5,826
Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures.......................... 38,594 24,032
-------- --------
45,020 29,858
Less accumulated depreciation......................................... (23,814) (21,577)
-------- --------
$ 21,206 $ 8,281
======== ========
</TABLE>
Depreciation expense totaled $5,073,000, $4,848,000 and $3,733,000 for the
years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively.
28
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
(9) Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------
1996 1997
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
(in thousands)
Payments received from customers in excess of contract costs.. $ 3,657 $ 2,691
Employee benefit plan accruals................................ 2,423 2,219
Sale of business price adjustment............................. -- 2,914
Other......................................................... 10,336 10,492
------- -------
$16,416 $18,316
======= =======
</TABLE>
Included in other current liabilities are employee payroll deductions,
advance payments, accrued operating expenses and accrued interest, none of which
exceed 5% of total current liabilities.
(10) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------
1996 1997
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
(in thousands)
Revolving credit (a).......................................... $ 6,934 $ --
Term note (a)................................................. 2,690 --
Other (b)..................................................... 4,128 198
------- -------
Total long-term debt.......................................... 13,752 198
Less unamortized original issue discount (a).................. (120) --
Less current portion of long-term debt........................ (3,513) 198
------- -------
$10,119 $ --
======= =======
</TABLE>
Effective November 14, 1997, the Company, its Parent and certain of the
Parent's subsidiaries (collectively, the "Loan Parties") entered into a loan
agreement with a bank (the "1997 Agreement"). The 1997 Agreement provides credit
availability to the Loan Parties by means of a total revolving credit line of
$30,000,000 and a term note of $15,000,000. As of December 31, 1997, $13,850,000
was available to the Loan Parties. The 1997 Agreement is secured by the assets
of all of the Loan Parties. Under the terms of the 1997 Agreement, the Loan
Parties pay interest monthly at the LIBOR rate plus a variable spread, or
approximately 7.4% at December 31, 1997. The 1997 Agreement also requires
compliance with a number of financial and non-financial covenants and prohibits
the Company from paying dividends. Principal payments on the term note are due
quarterly through September 30, 2002, which is also the maturity date for the
revolving credit line. Since the inception of the 1997 Agreement, the Company
has not drawn upon the credit facility.
(a) On March 29, 1996, the Company entered into a financing agreement (the
"Credit Agreement") with its bank to replace a prior debt instrument. The
Credit Agreement provided the Company with a revolving line of credit
facility (the "Revolver"), a $3,300,000 two-year facility (the "Term Note")
and an additional $5,000,000 facility (the "1996 Note"). Borrowings under
the Credit Agreement were secured by substantially all of the assets of the
Company. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company paid interest
monthly on outstanding borrowings at the prime rate plus 1.25%. The Company
was provided credit availability on the Revolver equal to the lesser of
$27,500,000 or the applicable amount of its eligible accounts receivable
and inventories. As amended, the Credit Agreement provided credit
availability on the Revolver equal to the lesser of $13,500,000 or the
applicable amount of its eligible accounts receivable and inventories
through June 30, 1997, at which time the Company repaid the outstanding
borrowings in full and terminated the Credit Agreement.
29
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
The Company, in connection with the execution of the Credit Agreement, paid
a $250,000 fee and issued warrants to purchase 1,200,000 shares of Common
Stock at $0.01 per share to the lender. Upon execution of the Credit
Agreement, 200,000 of the warrants became exercisable. On March 29, 1996,
the Company believed that it was probable that the Credit Agreement would
be refinanced prior to the remaining warrants becoming exercisable.
Therefore, only the 200,000 warrants were initially considered in
determining the fair value of the transaction. An additional 125,000
warrants vested on March 31, 1997. As a result of the early repayment and
termination of the Credit Agreement on June 30, 1997, 875,000 unvested
warrants were forfeited by the lender. The warrants will expire five years
following the issue date.
In connection with an amendment to the Credit Agreement on March 28, 1997,
the Parent invested $2,500,000 in GTC in exchange for 250,000 shares of GTC
Preferred Stock (the "Preferred Stock"). The Preferred Stock is redeemable
and pays quarterly dividends of 8.5% per annum of which approximately
$160,000 was payable at December 31, 1997. The Company agreed to utilize
$500,000 of the proceeds of the Preferred Stock to partially repay the Term
Note. The Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the holder upon
repayment by the Company of all of its outstanding Credit Agreement
indebtedness. The Preferred Stock is also convertible and each share may be
exchanged for 8.1 shares of the Company's Common Stock. The parent intends
to exercise its conversion rights on or about March 30, 1998.
(b) In connection with two business acquisitions, the Company agreed to make
additional payments to the sellers over a five-year period from the
respective dates of acquisition based upon sales to certain customers. The
Company believed the maximum future payments were probable and recorded
debt equal to the net present value of the maximum future payments on the
date of acquisition. At December 31, 1996, and December 31, 1997, $587,000
and $198,000, respectively, was payable to the sellers.
In connection with the acquisition of GTC Brazil, the Company was obligated
on a note payable to IBM Brasil. The note was for a term of three years and
was secured by GTC Brazil's equipment. The Company recorded the note at its
net present value discounted at current market interest rates for
comparable financing.
During 1996, the Company purchased approximately $1,100,000 of equipment
which was financed by the manufacturer. At December 31, 1996, $613,000 was
payable to the manufacturer.
Interest paid during 1995, 1996 and 1997 totaled $3,427,000, $2,974,000 and
$872,000, respectively.
(11) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and
redeemable preferred stock are reflected in the financial statements at their
carrying amount which approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity
or callable features of those instruments. The carrying amount of debt
outstanding under the Company's revolving credit agreement approximated fair
value through the termination date of that agreement, due to the short-term
nature of the instrument. The carrying amount of other long-term debt is assumed
to approximate fair value because there have not been any significant changes in
market conditions or specific circumstances since the instruments were recorded
at fair value.
(12) Employee Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors defined contribution plans (the "Plans") for
substantially all domestic employees of the Company. The Plans are intended to
meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plans
allow the Company to match participant contributions as approved by the Board of
Directors. Contributions to the Plans during 1995, 1996 and 1997 were
$1,783,000, $902,000 and $618,000, respectively.
30
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
The Company has partially self-insured employee medical plans. The plans
limit the Company's annual obligations to fund claims to specified amounts per
participant and in the aggregate. The Company is insured for amounts in excess
of these limits. Employees are responsible, in some instances, for payment of a
portion of the premiums. During 1995, 1996 and 1997, the Company charged
$4,526,000, $3,732,000 and $2,265,000, respectively, to operations related to
reinsurance premiums, medical claims incurred and estimated, and administrative
costs for its employee medical plans. The Company accounts for medical claims in
the period in which they are incurred, which includes estimated costs of claims
incurred but not reported. The Company estimates the amount of claims incurred
but not reported based on historical experience and average monthly claims. The
Company also estimates and records the effect of known claims in excess of
average monthly claim amounts. Claims paid during 1995, 1996 and 1997 did not
exceed the aggregate limits.
(13) Stock Plans
Stock Option Plans
In October 1994, the Board of Directors adopted the 1994 Stock Option Plan
for Key Employees (the "1994 Plan") and the Independent Directors' Stock Option
Plan (the "Directors Plan"). The 1994 Plan replaced the Stock Option Plan
adopted in January 1990 (the "1990 Plan"). Options remain outstanding and
exercisable under the terminated 1990 Plan; however, no further grants will be
made under the 1990 Plan. During 1994, no options were granted under the 1990
Plan prior to its termination on May 18, 1994.
Under the 1994 Plan, as amended, options may be granted to employees to
purchase a maximum of 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock. Options to purchase
179,000, 553,066 and 670,300 shares were granted under the 1994 Plan during
1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively.
Under the Directors Plan, as amended, options may be granted to members of
the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Parent, the Company or its
subsidiaries to purchase a maximum of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock. Options
to purchase 25,951, 78,371 and 136,579 shares were granted under the Directors
Plan during 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively.
On February 2, 1996, the Board of Directors approved, subject to further
approval by the shareholders, the Group Technologies Corporation Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the Purchase Plan) and reserved 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock
for issuance under the Purchase Plan. The Purchase Plan has never been presented
for approval by the shareholders and no shares have been issued under this plan.
Options granted under the 1990 Plan have a maximum term of 13 years.
Options granted under the 1994 Plan and the Directors' Plan have a maximum term
of 10 years. The exercise price of all options granted under such plans must be
at least 100% of the fair market value of such shares on the date of grant. The
Option Plan Committee of the Board of Directors was formed in 1994 to administer
the 1994 Plan and the Directors Plan. Until October 1996, the Option Plan
Committee had the sole authority to select the individuals who were granted
options and determine the number of shares subject to each option, fix the
period during which each option may be exercised and fix the price at which
shares subject to options may be purchased. Beginning in October 1996, both the
full Board of Directors and the Option Plan Committee have authority to
administer the stock option plans.
31
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
The following table summarizes option activity for the three years ended
December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Outstanding
----------------------
Option
price
Shares per share
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1994........... 1,030,000 $1.67-7.75
Granted.............................. 204,951 4.50-6.38
Exercised............................ (90,000) 1.67
Terminated/forfeited................. (125,000) 6.00-6.25
--------- ----------
Balance at December 31, 1995........... 1,019,951 1.67-7.75
Granted.............................. 631,437 0.84-3.00
Terminated/forfeited................. (401,700) 2.35-6.00
--------- ----------
Balance at December 31, 1996........... 1,249,688 0.84-7.75
Granted.............................. 806,879 0.88-4.03
Exercised............................ (600) 2.75
Terminated/forfeited................. (411,600) 1.06-5.25
========= ==========
Balance at December 1997............... 1,644,367 $0.84-7.75
========= ==========
</TABLE>
Accounting for Stock Based Compensation
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and related interpretations in
accounting for its employee stock options because, as discussed below, the
alternative fair value method requires use of option valuation models that were
not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. Because the exercise
price of the Company's employee stock options is equal to the market price of
the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is
recognized.
Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share has
been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options
under the fair value method. The fair value for these options were estimated at
the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and
1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
---------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Risk-free interest rate......................... 5.88% 5.88% 5.75%
Volatility factor of the expected market price
of the Company's common stock.................. 0.71 0.71 1.12
Dividend yield.................................. None None None
Weighted average expected life of the options... 2.7 years 2.6 years 3.3 years
</TABLE>
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in
management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
32
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's
pro forma information follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
------------------------
1996 1997
-------- --------
(in thousands, except
per share data)
<S> <C> <C>
Pro forma net loss............. $(8,747) $(3,465)
======= =======
Pro forma net loss per share:
Basic......................... $ (0.54) $ (0.21)
Diluted....................... $ (0.54) $ (0.21)
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes the weighted average exercise prices for
option activity for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
-------------------------
1996 1997
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period.................... $2.33 $2.30
Granted at exercise price equal to market price... 2.46 1.29
Granted at exercise price less than market price.. -- --
Exercised......................................... -- 2.75
Forfeited......................................... 2.79 2.23
Expired........................................... 2.35 --
Balance at end of period.......................... 2.30 1.82
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes certain weighted average data for options
outstanding and currently exercisable as of December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Outstanding Exercisable
--------------------------------------- ----------------------
Weighted Average
------------------------ Weighted
Remaining Average
Exercise Contractual Exercise
Exercise Price Range Shares Price Life Shares Price
--------------------------- ------------------------ ----------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$0.84 - $1.28.............. 702,638 $1.15 8.2 88,030 $1.16
$1.38 - $1.88.............. 415,872 $1.64 2.8 340,967 $1.64
$2.25 - $3.13.............. 440,201 $2.46 6.1 58,400 $2.78
$3.75 - $4.50.............. 63,705 $4.14 6.9 34,472 $4.35
$5.75 - $7.75.............. 21,951 $6.84 7.3 21,951 $6.84
--------- -------
Total.................... 1,644,367 $1.82 6.2 543,820 $2.07
========= =======
</TABLE>
The per share weighted average fair value of options granted during the
years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 were $2.76, $1.10 and $1.30
respectively. As of December 31, 1996, 594,322 options with a weighted average
exercise price of $2.07 were exercisable.
(14) Shareholders' Equity
During 1995, 1996 and 1997 certain transactions were executed with related
parties (see Note 17). As more fully discussed in Note 10, the Company has
issued warrants to a previous lender to purchase the Company's Common Stock.
33
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
(15) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases all of its real property and certain computer,
manufacturing and office equipment. The real property operating leases have
terms up to ten years and contain various renewal and rent escalation clauses.
The equipment operating leases have terms of up to five years. Future minimum
noncancelable lease payments for each year ending December 31, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(in thousands)
<S> <C>
1998................................................ $3,055
1999................................................ 2,109
2000................................................ 1,152
2001................................................ 1,161
2002................................................ 542
Thereafter.......................................... --
</TABLE>
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, totaled
$5,194,000, $3,660,000, and $2,675,000, respectively.
The Company, through its subsidiary, Metrum, is involved in matters
involving alleged overpayments made by the U.S. government to Metrum and
previous owners of the business. The majority of the alleged overpayments were
made to the previous owners of the business. Metrum is evaluating its position
and developing a strategy for resolving these issues. It is not possible to
reasonably estimate the extent of Metrum's liability at this time.
The Company is involved in certain litigation and contract issues arising
in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot, at
this time, be predicted in light of the uncertainties inherent therein,
management does not expect that these matters will have a material adverse
effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
(16) Income Taxes
The components of income tax expense (benefit) are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
------------------------
1995 1996 1997
------- ----- ----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income taxes currently payable (refundable):
Federal...................................... $(5,263) $(333) $ --
State........................................ 112 62 --
Foreign...................................... 428 481 152
------- ----- ----
(4,723) 210 152
Deferred income taxes:
Federal...................................... 668 589 --
State........................................ 73 -- --
------- ----- ----
741 589 --
------- ----- ----
$(3,982) $ 799 $152
======= ===== ====
</TABLE>
Income taxes paid during 1996 and 1997 were $762,000 and $773,000,
respectively. Income tax refunds received during 1995 and 1996 were $2,350,000
and $4,928,000, respectively, all of which was received from the Parent. At
December 31, 1996 and 1997, federal income taxes receivable from the Parent of
$330,000 were included in other current assets.
34
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
The following is a reconciliation of income tax expense recognized to that
computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 34% in 1995, 1996 and 1997 to
income before income taxes:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
---------------------------
1995 1996 1997
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal tax at the statutory rate........................ $(7,363) $(2,645) $(1,035)
State income taxes net of federal tax benefit............ (76) 46 --
State tax net operating loss carry forward............... (1,080) (617) (29)
Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax asset..... 4,367 3,175 418
Effect of foreign losses, foreign taxes and other items.. 170 840 798
------- ------- -------
$(3,982) $ 799 $ 152
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences
between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Due to the uncertain nature of the ultimate realization of deferred
tax assets based upon the Company's financial performance during 1995, 1996 and
1997 and the potential expiration of the net operating loss carryforward, the
Company has established a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.
The Company will recognize the benefits associated with the deferred tax assets
only as reassessment demonstrates they are realizable. Realization is entirely
dependent upon future earnings in specific tax jurisdictions. While the need for
this valuation allowance is subject to periodic review, if the allowance is
reduced, the tax benefits will be recorded in future operations as a reduction
of the Company's income tax expense.
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-----------------
1996 1997
------- -------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Compensation and benefit accruals.. $ 773 $ 844
Inventory valuation................ 1,550 1,377
Net operating loss carryforward.... 4,442 4,161
Other.............................. 1,409 1,949
------- -------
8,174 8,331
Valuation allowance.................. (7,542) (7,960)
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation....................... (458) (177)
Contract provisions................ (130) (194)
Other.............................. (44) --
------- -------
Net deferred tax asset............... $ -- $ --
======= =======
</TABLE>
During the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, the Company recorded a
valuation allowance of $3,175,000 and $418,000 respectively, on its deferred tax
assets to reduce the total to an amount that management believes will more
likely than not be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon sufficient taxable income during the period that temporary differences and
carryforwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable income.
35
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
At December 31, 1997, for federal income tax purposes, the Company had a
net operating loss carryforward of approximately $9,955,000, which will expire
beginning in 2011. At December 31, 1997, for state income tax purposes, the
Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $17,740,000,
which will expire beginning in 2010.
(17) Related Party Transactions
During 1995, the Company paid a corporate allocation (0.2% of revenue) to
the Parent of $274,000 in cash and 69,813 shares of Common Stock valued at
$300,000, based on the fair market value of the shares during the related
period. All shares issuable as of December 31, 1995 were issued during 1996.
During 1996, the corporate allocation consisted of the issuance of 17,391 shares
of Common Stock valued at approximately $50,000. The Company is also a party to
a consolidated federal income tax sharing agreement with the Parent applicable
to the tax periods during which the Company is includable in the Parent's
consolidated federal income tax return.
The Company issued 374,531 shares of its Common Stock to the Parent in a
private placement transaction in March 1996. The shares were sold to the Parent
in exchange for $1,000,000 in cash. The per share price of the transaction was
equal to an average of the prices for the last sale transactions of the Common
Stock on each of the last three business days immediately preceding the date of
sale.
On February 9, 1996, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of
its Metrum subsidiary to a related party, which resulted in the recognition of
additional paid-in capital of $613,000 during 1996 (see Note 4). During 1997,
the Company recognized additional paid-in capital of $1,454,000 in accordance
with the earn-out provision of the Metrum sale agreement.
(18) Geographic Segments
Through June 30, 1997, the Company was a multinational corporation with
operations in the United States, Mexico and Brazil. Information about the
Company's operations in geographic areas for the years ended December 31, 1995,
1996 and 1997 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue:
United States........................... $233,515 $166,204 $ 96,425
Latin America........................... 40,132 58,457 16,931
-------- -------- --------
$273,647 $224,661 $113,356
======== ======== ========
Operating Loss:
United States........................... $(16,172) $ (3,665) $ (3,277)
Latin America........................... (2,055) (1,316) (2,172)
-------- -------- --------
$(18,227) $ (4,981) $ (5,449)
======== ======== ========
Identifiable Assets:
United States........................... $ 87,049 $ 47,311 47,364
Latin America........................... 26,057 20,154 --
-------- -------- --------
$113,106 $ 67,465 $ 47,364
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
Identifiable assets of foreign subsidiaries are those assets related to the
operations of those subsidiaries. The Company's domestic assets consist of all
other operating assets of the Company. (See also Note 4; "Dispositions.")
36
<PAGE>
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
(19) Fourth Quarter Adjustments
The Company recognized charges during the fourth quarter of 1996 totaling
approximately $5,100,000, which increased the cost of operations by $3,800,000
and selling, general and administrative expense by $1,300,000. Charges to the
cost of operations were primarily related to a domestic operations physical
inventory adjustment of $300,000, a foreign operations physical inventory
adjustment of $700,000, estimate revisions for costs of sales related to long-
term contracts of $800,000, increased reserves for excess inventories of
$600,000, and costs associated with asset disposals and retirements of $900,000
and amortization of lease payments due at the end of the respective lease terms
of $500,000. The $900,000 charge for asset disposals and retirements resulted
from a fourth quarter review of the Company's fixed assets, in which certain
assets were not readily identifiable or were deemed to be surplus as a result of
the corresponding reduction in the Company's operations. The $500,000 charge for
lease payments reflected the inception-to-date amortization of end-of-lease
payments for certain lease agreements which originated during 1994. The fourth
quarter charges to selling, general and administrative expense include severance
costs of $500,000, warehouse move costs of $500,000 and an increase in the
reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable of $300,000. With regard to the
warehouse costs, in the second quarter of 1996 the Company implemented a cost
saving strategy to integrate the materials warehousing function into its main
Tampa facility. The total cost of the move was originally estimated to be
$400,000 comprised of planning and interior demolition costs, labor associated
with the move of the warehouse function to the main facility, the impairment of
existing leasehold improvements in the warehouse and estimated lease obligations
net of estimated sublease revenue. However, an increased cost of $500,000 was
recorded in the fourth quarter based on actual costs incurred and the review of
additional information regarding sublease strategies, including the Company's
ability to sublease the warehouse at favorable lease rates. The anticipated date
of completion of the warehouse relocation activity is contingent upon early
termination of the lease. The lease currently provides for an early termination
during January, 2000.
The Company did not recognize significant charges during the fourth quarter
of 1997.
37
<PAGE>
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table contains certain information concerning the directors
and executive officers of GTC.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Position with GTC and Principal Occupation
---- --- ------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Jeffrey T. Gill................... 42 Director and Chairman of the Board; President and Chief Executive Officer of GFP
Robert E. Gill.................... 72 Director; Chairman of the Board of GFP
Sidney R. Petersen................ 67 Director; Retired; formerly Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Getty Oil, Inc.
Henry F. Frigon................... 63 Director; Retired; formerly President and Chief Executive Officer of BATUS, Inc.
Roger W. Johnson.................. 63 Director; Former Administrator of U.S. General Services Administration
Thomas W. Lovelock................ 55 Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
David D. Johnson.................. 42 Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
James G. Cocke.................... 50 Vice President and Manager of Federal Systems Division
</TABLE>
All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or
until their successors are elected and qualified. Officers are appointed by the
GTC Board and serve at the discretion of the GTC Board.
Jeffrey T. Gill has served as Chairman of the Board of GTC since 1992 and
as a director of GTC since 1989. Mr. Gill co-founded GFP and has served as its
President and Chief Executive Officer since 1992 and as a director since its
inception in 1983. Mr. Gill also serves as a director and officer of several
other privately-held companies which are either direct or indirect subsidiaries
of GFP. Jeffrey T. Gill is the son of Robert E. Gill.
Robert E. Gill has served as a director of GTC since 1989 and as Chairman
of the Board of GTC from 1989 to 1992. Mr. Gill served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of GTC from October 1996 to February 1997, at which time he
was elected to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Bell. Mr.
Gill served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bell until he resigned
in March 1998. Mr. Gill co-founded GFP and has served as its Chairman of the
Board since its inception in 1983 and as President and Chief Executive Officer
from 1983 through 1992. Mr. Gill also serves as a director and officer of
several other privately-held companies which are either direct or indirect
subsidiaries of GFP. Robert E. Gill is the father of Jeffrey T. Gill.
Sidney R. Petersen has served as a director of GTC since 1994. Mr. Petersen
retired as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Getty Oil, Inc.
in 1984. Mr. Petersen served Getty Oil in a variety of increasingly responsible
management positions since 1955. Mr. Petersen currently serves as director of
Avery Dennison Corporation, Union Bank of California, Seagull Energy
Corporation, and NICOR, Inc. and its subsidiary, Northern Illinois Gas Company.
38
<PAGE>
Henry F. Frigon has served as a director of GTC since 1994. Mr. Frigon is
currently a private investor and business consultant. Mr. Frigon most recently
served as Executive Vice President-Corporate Development and Strategy and Chief
Financial Officer of Hallmark Cards, Inc. from 1990 through 1994. Mr. Frigon
retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of BATUS, Inc. in March 1990,
after serving with that company for over 10 years. Mr. Frigon currently serves
as director of H & R Block, Inc., Buckeye Technologies, Inc. and Dimon, Inc.
Roger W. Johnson has served as a director of GTC since 1996. Mr. Johnson
most recently served as Administrator of the United States General Services
Administration from 1993 through 1996. Mr. Johnson served as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Western Digital Corporation, a disk drive and electronics
manufacturing company, from 1982 through 1993. Mr. Johnson currently serves as a
director of Array Microsystems, Insulectro, JTS Corporation and Needham Funds,
Inc.
Thomas W. Lovelock has served as a director of GTC since March 1997 and as
President and Chief Executive Officer of GTC since February 1997. He was also
Vice President of Operations of GTC from 1989 until 1993. From 1995 to 1997, Mr.
Lovelock served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bell. From 1993
until 1995, Mr. Lovelock served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of Bell.
David D. Johnson has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of GTC since March 1996. From 1993 to 1996, Mr. Johnson served as Financial
Director, Far East South for Molex Incorporated, which manufactures electronic
components and tooling used by OEMs. He served Molex in various other management
positions since 1984. Prior to 1984, Mr. Johnson was a senior manager for KPMG
Peat Marwick in San Francisco, California.
James G. Cocke has served as Vice President and Manager of Federal Systems
Division of GTC since March 1997. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Cocke was Division
Manager of the Services Division of Bell. Prior to 1995, he was employed as Vice
President of Finance for Science Applications International Corporation, which
designs and produces ruggedized computer equipment, CAE Link Corporation, which
designs and produces military flight simulators, and for Smiths Industries,
which designs and manufactures a wide range of electronic equipment.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Based solely on GTC's review of the copies of reports of ownership on Form
3 and changes in ownership on Forms 4 and 5 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission") by GTC's officers, directors and certain
beneficial shareholders, or written representations furnished to GTC by these
reporting persons, GTC believes that, during 1997, its officers, directors, and
greater than 10% beneficial owners were in compliance with all applicable filing
requirements.
39
<PAGE>
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the annual and long-term compensation paid
or accrued by GTC during the years indicated to each of GTC's Chief Executive
Officers and its other highest paid executive officers whose total salary and
bonus exceeded $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997 (collectively, the
"Named Officers").
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-Term
Annual Compensation (1) Compensation Awards
----------------------- ---------------------------
Restricted Options/ All
Stock SARs Other
Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Awards (# ) Compensation
- --------------------------- ---- -------- ------- ---------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert E. Gill (2).............. 1997 $ -- $ -- $ -- -- $ --
President & Chief Executive 1996 -- -- -- -- --
Officer
Thomas W. Lovelock (3).......... 1997 166,893(4) -- 14,208(5)(6) 400,000(7) 23,592(8)
President & Chief Executive
Officer
David D. Johnson (9)............ 1997 157,308 10,000(10) -- 60,000 44,721(11)
Vice President of 1996 115,962 50,000 -- 120,000 6,206
Finance & Chief
Financial Officer
James G. Cocke (12)............. 1997 110,385 -- -- 100,000 80,307(13)
Vice President &
Manager of Federal
Systems Division
</TABLE>
________________
(1) Includes amounts deferred, at the election of the Named Officers, pursuant
to GTC's 401(k) Plan. The Named Officers received certain perquisites and
benefits; however, GTC has concluded that the aggregate amount of such
personal benefits and other compensation is the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of
the total annual salary and bonus paid to each of the Named Officers.
(2) Robert E. Gill served as President and Chief Executive Officer of GTC,
without compensation of any kind from GTC or any third party, from October
31, 1996 until he resigned and was replaced by Thomas W. Lovelock on
February 28, 1997 .
(3) Mr. Lovelock began serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of GTC
on February 28, 1997.
(4) Pursuant to an arrangement between GTC and Bell Technologies, Inc.
("Bell"), Bell reimbursed GTC for $15,578 of the amount of Mr. Lovelock's
base salary shown above.
(5) On September 30, 1997, Mr. Lovelock, in connection with his exercise of a
one-time right and option to purchase shares of the Common Stock, was
awarded the right to receive 3,789 shares of restricted stock, subject to a
three-year vesting requirement. The dollar value shown above for such
restricted shares was determined based upon closing market price for the
Common Stock on September 30, 1997.
(6) As of December 31, 1997, Mr. Lovelock continued to hold the right to
receive 3,789 shares of restricted stock, subject to a three-year vesting
requirement. Such shares were valued at $10,657 based upon the closing
market price of the Common Stock on December 31, 1997. Any dividends paid
on the Company's Common Stock will also be paid on these restricted shares
once the vesting requirement has been fulfilled and the shares are issued.
40
<PAGE>
(7) The total number of securities underlying options granted to Mr. Lovelock
during 1997 consist of 300,000 shares for options granted to Mr. Lovelock
pursuant to GTC's 1994 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees and 100,000
shares for a one-time right and option to purchase shares of Common Stock
which was granted to Mr. Lovelock on April 4, 1997 and which was
exercisable by Mr. Lovelock between the dates of July 1, 1997 and September
30, 1997. On September 30, 1997, Mr. Lovelock exercised his right to
purchase 12,632 shares of Common Stock at their full fair market value and
he was awarded the right to receive 3,789 shares of restricted shares at no
cost, subject to a three-year vesting requirement.
(8) The amount shown includes $14,824 for reimbursed relocation costs, $7,567
for Matching and Profit Sharing Contributions made by GTC pursuant to its
401(k) Plan, and $1,200 of premiums paid by GTC during 1997 for term life
insurance for the benefit of Mr. Lovelock.
(9) David D. Johnson was hired as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on
March 22, 1996.
(10) Mr. Johnson received a lump sum cash bonus in the amount of $10,000 on
April 18, 1997.
(11) The amount shown includes $6,909 for Matching and Profit Sharing
Contributions made by GTC pursuant to GTC's 401(k) Plan and $37,812 for
reimbursed relocation costs. Pursuant to an arrangement between GTC and its
parent company, Group Financial Partners, Inc. ("GFP"), GFP paid for
$34,888 of the relocation costs incurred by Mr. Johnson in connection with
his move to Louisville, Kentucky in August 1997.
(12) James G. Cocke was hired as Vice President & Manager of Federal Systems
Division on March 17, 1997.
(13) The amount shown includes $74,976 for reimbursed relocation expenses and
$5,331 for Matching and Profit Sharing Contributions made by GTC pursuant
to GTC's 401(k) Plan.
41
<PAGE>
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
Set forth below is information on stock options granted during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1997 to the Named Officers.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants(1) Potential Realizable
------------------------------------------------------- Value at Assumed
No. of % of Total Rates of Stock Price
Securities Options Exercise Appreciation for
Underlying Granted to or Base Option Term (2)
Options Employees in Price Expiration ---------------------
Name Granted Fiscal Year ($/Share) Date 5% 10%
- ---- ---------- ------------ --------- ---------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert E. Gill(3)........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Thomas W. Lovelock(4)....... 100,000 13.0% (5) 09/30/97 0 0
12,500 1.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 8,353 21,167
12,500 1.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 8,353 21,167
12,500 1.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 8,353 21,167
12,500 1.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 8,353 21,167
12,500 1.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 8,353 21,167
12,500 1.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 8,353 21,167
12,500 1.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 8,353 21,167
12,500 1.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 8,353 21,167
25,000 3.2% 1.25 06/30/07 19,653 49,804
25,000 3.2% 1.25 06/30/07 19,653 49,804
25,000 3.2% 1.25 06/30/07 19,653 49,804
25,000 3.2% 1.25 06/30/07 19,653 49,804
25,000 3.2% 1.25 06/30/07 19,653 49,804
25,000 3.2% 1.25 06/30/07 19,653 49,804
25,000 3.2% 1.25 06/30/07 19,653 49,804
25,000 3.2% 1.25 06/30/07 19,653 49,804
David D. Johnson(6)......... 20,000 2.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 13,364 33,867
20,000 2.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 13,364 33,867
20,000 2.6% 1.0625 04/06/07 13,364 33,867
James G. Cocke(7)........... 12,500 1.6% 1.25 03/16/07 9,826 24,902
12,500 1.6% 1.25 03/16/07 9,826 24,902
12,500 1.6% 1.25 03/16/07 9,826 24,902
12,500 1.6% 1.25 03/16/07 9,826 24,902
12,500 1.6% 1.25 03/16/07 9,826 24,902
12,500 1.6% 1.25 03/16/07 9,826 24,902
12,500 1.6% 1.25 03/16/07 9,826 24,902
12,500 1.6% 1.25 03/16/07 9,826 24,902
</TABLE>
__________
(1) Except as disclosed in footnote 5 below, each grant was made pursuant to
the GTC 1994 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees.
(2) The 5% and 10% assumed rates of appreciation are required by rules of the
Commission and do not represent GTC's estimate or projection of the future
GTC Common Stock price.
(3) Robert E. Gill served as President and Chief Executive Officer from October
31, 1996 until February 28, 1997 and did not receive any options or other
compensation for his services.
(4) During 1997, GTC granted Mr. Lovelock three separate stock options for the
purchase of shares of GTC's Common Stock. On April 7, 1997, GTC granted
Mr. Lovelock a one-time right and option
42
<PAGE>
to, at any time between the dates of July 1, 1997 and September 30, 1997,
purchase up to 100,000 shares of GTC Common Stock pursuant to the terms and
conditions of that Stock Purchase Right Agreement dated April 7, 1997. GTC
granted Mr. Lovelock two additional stock options pursuant to the GTC 1994
Stock Option Plan for Key Employees. On April 7, 1997, the Company granted
Mr. Lovelock a second stock option for the purchase of 100,000 shares of
GTC's Common Stock. This option becomes exercisable in annual increments of
12,500 shares each, beginning one year from the date of grant. On July 1,
1997, the Company granted Mr. Lovelock a stock option for the purchase of
200,000 shares of GTC's Common Stock. This option becomes exercisable in
annual increments of 25,000 shares each, beginning one year from the date
of grant.
(5) Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Right Agreement dated April 7, 1997, the
exercise price of the one-time right and option to purchase up to 100,000
shares of GTC Common Stock was to be equal to the fair market value of the
Common Stock on the date of exercise, as defined in the agreement. Upon
exercise, however, the Company was to, subject to a three-year vesting
requirement, award Mr. Lovelock with a certain number of shares of
restricted stock at no cost, which number of shares was to be determined
according to a formula specified in the agreement. Mr. Lovelock exercised
his right to purchase 12,632 shares of GTC Common Stock on September 30,
1997 at a per share price of $3.958. Concurrent with this exercise, he was
awarded the right to receive 3,789 shares of restricted stock at no cost,
subject to a three-year vesting requirement.
(6) On April 7, 1997, the Company granted Mr. Johnson an option to purchase
60,000 shares of GTC's Common Stock. The option becomes exercisable in
annual increments of 20,000 shares each, beginning one year from the date
of grant.
(7) On March 17, 1997, the Company granted Mr. Cocke an option to purchase
100,000 shares of GTC's Common Stock. The option becomes exercisable in
annual increments of 12,500 shares each, beginning one year from the date
of grant.
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values
Set forth below is information on each exercise of stock options during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and the value as of December 31, 1997, of
unexercised stock options held by the Named Officers.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Number of Underlying Unexercised In-the-Money Options at
Shares Options at Fiscal Year-End Fiscal Year-End(1)
Acquired on Value -------------------------- --------------------------
Name Exercise Realized Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- ---- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert E. Gill(2)... -- $ -- -- -- $ -- $ --
Thomas W. Lovelock.. 12,632 0(3) -- 300,000 -- 487,500
David D. Johnson.... -- -- 15,000 165,000 8,438 164,063
James G. Cocke...... -- -- -- 100,000 -- 156,250
- ----------------
</TABLE>
(1) Based on a market value of the underlying securities of $2.8125 at December
31, 1997 minus the exercise price of the options.
(2) Robert E. Gill served as President and Chief Executive Officer of GTC,
without compensation of any kind from GTC or any third party, from October
31, 1996 until he resigned and was replaced by Thomas W. Lovelock on
February 28, 1997.
(3) Mr. Lovelock exercised a one-time right and option to purchase 12,632
shares of GTC's Common Stock on September 30, 1997. Pursuant to the terms
of the Stock Purchase Right Agreement dated April 7, 1997, Mr. Lovelock
paid GTC an exercise price for these shares equal to the fair market value
of the Common Stock on September 30, 1997. However, concurrent with the
exercise of this option, GTC awarded Mr. Lovelock the right to receive
3,789 shares of restricted stock at no cost, subject to three-year vesting
requirement.
43
<PAGE>
Compensation of Directors
Directors who are employees of GTC or any affiliate of GTC are not eligible
to receive any compensation for services rendered as a director, but they are
reimbursed for travel and related expenses they incur in order to attend Board
meetings. Directors of GTC who are not employees of GTC or any affiliate of GTC
("Independent Directors") are compensated pursuant to the terms and conditions
of GTC's Independent Directors' Compensation Program (the "Program") which was
adopted by the Board on September 1, 1995. As amended by the Board on June 25,
1997 the Program provides that each Independent Director shall be granted a
stock option for the purchase of 10,000 shares of GTC's Common Stock each time
he or she is elected and reelected to serve for a full term on the Board. If an
Independent Director is elected to the Board after the beginning of a term, the
Program states that the number of underlying shares for the option shall be
prorated accordingly.
In addition to the aforementioned stock options, the Program, as amended on
June 25, 1997, provides that each of the Independent Directors is paid an annual
retainer of $15,000 and an attendance fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting the
director attends in person, or alternatively, a fee of $300 for each meeting the
director participates in by telephone. Independent Directors are entitled to
compensation for attending or participating in meetings of committees of the
Board only if such meetings are held on dates other than the dates of meetings
of the full Board. In the event that committee meetings are held on dates other
than the dates of meetings of the full Board, each Independent Director who
attends a committee meeting in person and serves as the chairperson of the
meeting shall receive the sum of $1,250 per meeting, and each of the other
Independent Directors who attend such a committee meeting in person shall
receive the sum of $1,000 per meeting. Alternatively, each Independent Director
who, as the chairperson or as a committee member, participates by telephone in
committee meetings of the Board which are held on dates other than the dates of
meetings of the full Board, shall receive the sum of $300 per meeting. Each of
the Independent Directors is also reimbursed for travel and related expenses he
or she incurs in order to attend Board and/or committee meetings.
An Independent Director may elect to receive his or her annual retainer and
attendance fees either in cash or in the form of stock options granted to him or
her by GTC pursuant to the GTC Independent Directors' Stock Option Plan. Those
Independent Directors who elect to receive cash compensation may elect to defer
any of their compensation by participating in GTC's Management Deferred
Compensation Plan. Upon their election to the Board in 1996, Henry F. Frigon and
Sidney R. Petersen each elected to receive their annual retainer and attendance
fees in the form of stock options to be granted on a quarterly basis throughout
the term which ended on June 25, 1997. Roger W. Johnson, however, elected to
receive his annual retainer and attendance fees, for the term which ended on
June 25, 1997, in the form of cash, without any deferral. Upon their reelection
to the Board on June 25, 1997, each of the Independent Directors received an
option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at $1.03125 per
share and each of them elected to receive his annual retainer and attendance
fees, for the upcoming term, in the form of stock options to be granted on a
quarterly basis. Accordingly, during 1997, Mr. Johnson received total cash
payments of $10,500 and stock options to purchase 16,183 shares at a weighted
average exercise price of $2.02, pursuant to the terms of the Program. During
1997, Messrs. Frigon and Petersen each received stock options to purchase 45,198
shares at a weighted average exercise price of $1.43, pursuant to the terms of
the Program. Additionally, under a separate compensation arrangement for special
committee activities in connection with evaluating a plan of reorganization for
the Company, the Company made cash payments to Messrs. Johnson, Frigon and
Petersen during 1997 in the amounts of $5,900, $4,500 and $4,200, respectively.
None of the Independent Directors exercised stock options in 1996.
Employment Contracts
GTC entered into an employment agreement in June, 1997, with Thomas W.
Lovelock, GTC's President and Chief Executive Officer. Subject to certain
conditions, the term of the employment agreement extends from July 1, 1997
through June 30, 1999. During the term of the agreement, Mr.
44
<PAGE>
Lovelock is to receive a base salary of $200,000, which amount may be adjusted
by GTC at its sole discretion. Additionally, upon meeting certain conditions,
Mr. Lovelock is also eligible to receive a one-time, lump sum cash bonus in the
amount of $75,000. The agreement also provides that, if GTC terminates Mr.
Lovelock without cause or for other than certain specified reasons, Mr. Lovelock
shall receive pay continuance for a period of two years from the date of
termination, along with customary medical and dental benefits and life insurance
coverage for a period of one year from the date of termination, and GTC shall
take the necessary actions to permit all stock options held by Mr. Lovelock to
remain valid beyond the date of such termination. Mr. Lovelock agreed to certain
nonsolicitation, noncompetition and confidentiality provisions which shall
remain in force beyond the term of the agreement and shall, accordingly, survive
any termination thereof.
GTC also entered into an employment agreement in June, 1997, with James G.
Cocke, GTC's Vice President and Manager of the Federal Systems Division. Subject
to certain conditions, the term of the employment agreement extends from July 1,
1997 through June 30, 1998. During the term of the agreement, Mr. Cocke is to
receive a base salary of $140,000, which amount may be adjusted by GTC at its
sole discretion. Additionally, upon meeting certain conditions, Mr. Cocke is
also eligible to receive a one-time, lump sum cash bonus in the amount of
$50,000. The agreement also provides that, if GTC terminates Mr. Cocke without
cause or for other than certain specified reasons, Mr. Cocke shall receive pay
continuance, along with customary medical and dental benefits and life insurance
coverage, for a period of one year from the date of termination. Mr. Cocke
agreed to certain confidentiality provisions which shall remain in force beyond
the term of the agreement and shall, accordingly, survive any termination
thereof.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Committee was formed in August 1994 and is composed of Jeffrey T. Gill,
Robert E. Gill, Henry F. Frigon and Sidney R. Petersen. Two members of the
Compensation Committee were also executive officers of GTC during 1997: Jeffrey
T. Gill served as Chairman of the Board of GTC for the entire year and Robert E.
Gill served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of GTC until February
28, 1997. Neither Jeffrey T. Gill nor Robert. E. Gill received any compensation
from GTC for their services as executive officers of GTC.
Jeffrey T. Gill and Robert E. Gill beneficially own 32.4% and 39.0%,
respectively, of the GFP Common Stock and they each serve as a director, officer
and member of the compensation committees of GFP and several other entities
which are also subsidiaries of GFP, including Bell. Pursuant to an arrangement
between GTC and Bell, Bell agreed to reimburse GTC for a portion of the salary
paid through June 30, 1997 to Thomas W. Lovelock, GTC's President and Chief
Executive Officer. Additionally, pursuant to an arrangement between GTC and GFP,
GFP agreed to reimburse David D. Johnson, GTC's Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer, for a portion of the relocation expenses Mr. Johnson
incurred in connection with his move to Louisville, Kentucky in August 1997. As
described more fully in Item 13 below, GTC has engaged or has proposed to engage
in certain other transactions with GFP, Bell and other subsidiaries of GFP.
45
<PAGE>
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
OWNERSHIP OF GTC COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to
beneficial ownership of GTC Common Stock, including beneficial ownership (i) of
each person (or group of affiliated persons) who is known by GTC to own
beneficially more than 5% of the shares of GTC Common Stock, (ii) by each of
GTC's directors who owns shares, (iii) by each of the Named Officers reflected
in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) by all directors and executive
officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of GTC
Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Beneficially Owned
-----------------------------------------------
After the
March 13, 1998 Reorganization(2)
-------------- -----------------
Name Number Percent(1) Number(3) Percent
---- ------ ---------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(a) Certain Beneficial Owners
Group Financial Partners, Inc. (4)............... 15,064,625 82.2% -- --
455 South Fourth Avenue
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
(b) Management
Thomas W. Lovelock............................... 13,422 * 13,422 *
David D. Johnson................................. 16,525(5) * 16,525 *
James G. Cocke................................... -- -- -- --
Henry F. Frigon.................................. 118,809(6) * 118,809 *
Sidney R. Petersen............................... 117,129(7) * 117,129 *
Roger W. Johnson................................. 38,543(8) * 38,543 *
Robert E. Gill................................... 15,068,625(9) 82.3% 13,102,649 35.0%
Jeffrey T. Gill.................................. 15,065,300(10) 82.2% 10,864,318 29.0%
All directors and executive officers as a group.. 15,378,828 82.7% 24,271,395 64.3%
</TABLE>
- ----------------
* less than 1%
(1) The percentages shown were calculated based upon 16,292,221 shares of GTC
Common Stock which were outstanding as of March 13, 1998, plus the
respective number of additional shares for each person which are deemed
outstanding pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act.
(2) On March 16, 1998, the shareholders of GTC approved a proposal for GTC to
enter into the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization dated as of February 5, 1998 by and amoung GTC, GFP, Bell
and Tube Turns Technologies, Inc. (the "Reorganization Agreement"), which
document was disclosed as part of GTC's registration statement on Form S-4,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and declared effective
on February 12, 1998. The effective date of the transactions contemplated
in the Reorganization Agreement is expected to be on or about March 30,
1998.
(3) Based on the GTC Share Value of $3.04 per share pursuant to the terms of
the Reorganization Agreement.
(4) Includes 250,000 shares of GTC Preferred Stock convertible into GTC Common
Stock at a rate of 8.1 shares of GTC Common Stock for each share of GTC
Preferred Stock. Robert E. Gill, Jeffrey T. Gill, R. Scott Gill, Virginia
G. Gill and Patricia G. Gill own 19.3%, 32.3%, 28.0%, 19.7% and 0.1%,
respectively (99.4% in the aggregate), of the outstanding stock of GFP and,
therefore, may be deemed to have an indirect beneficial interest in all of
the shares of GTC Common Stock and
46
<PAGE>
GTC Preferred Stock owned by GFP. Robert E. Gill is also a director of GTC
and Jeffrey T. Gill is a director and an executive officer of GTC. The
shares indicated as owned by GFP after the Reorganization will be owned
directly by the former shareholders of GFP. All of the shares of GTC Common
Stock and GTC Preferred Stock held by GFP have been pledged by GFP to
secure the credit facility between GTC and Bank One, Kentucky, NA. Each of
Robert E. Gill, Jeffrey T. Gill, R. Scott Gill, Virginia G. Gill and
Patricia G. Gill disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares of GTC Common
Stock and GTC Preferred Stock held by GFP, other than the pro rata portion
of such shares allocable to any of them and their spouses.
(5) Includes 15,000 shares issuable under currently exercisable options.
(6) Includes 113,809 shares issuable under currently exercisable options.
(7) Includes 114,629 shares issuable under currently exercisable options.
(8) Includes 38,543 shares issuable under currently exercisable options.
(9) Includes (i) 2,000 shares directly owned by Robert E. Gill, (ii) 2,000
shares owned by his spouse, (iii) 13,039,625 shares of GTC Common Stock
held by GFP which may be deemed beneficially owned by him, but a portion of
which ownership is disclaimed as set forth in note (4) above, and (iv)
2,025,000 shares of GTC Common Stock into which the shares of GTC Preferred
Stock held by GFP are convertible, but a portion of which ownership is
disclaimed as set forth in note (4) above.
(10) Includes (i) 675 shares directly owned by Jeffrey T. Gill, (ii) 13,039,625
shares of GTC Common Stock held by GFP which may be deemed beneficially
owned by him, but a portion of which ownership is disclaimed as set forth
in note (4) above, and (iii) 2,025,000 shares of GTC Common Stock into
which the shares of GTC Preferred Stock held by GFP are convertible, but a
portion of which ownership is disclaimed as set forth in note (4) above.
47
<PAGE>
OWNERSHIP OF GTC PREFERRED STOCK
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to
beneficial ownership of GTC Preferred Stock, including beneficial ownership (i)
of each person (or group of affiliated persons) who is known by GTC to own
beneficially more than 5% of the shares of GTC Preferred Stock, (ii) by each of
GTC's directors who owns shares, (iii) by each of the Named Officers reflected
in the Summary Compensation Table and (iv) by all directors and executive
officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of GTC
Preferred Stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Beneficially Owned
----------------------------------------------
After the
March 13, 1998 Reorganization
---------------------- -----------------
Name Number Percent Number Percent
---- ------- ------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(a) Certain Beneficial Owners
Group Financial Partners, Inc....... 250,000 (1) 100.0% -- --
455 South Fourth Avenue
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
(b) Management
Thomas W. Lovelock.................... -- -- -- --
David D. Johnson...................... -- -- -- --
James G. Cocke........................ -- -- -- --
Henry F. Frigon....................... -- -- -- --
Sidney R. Petersen.................... -- -- -- --
Roger W. Johnson...................... -- -- -- --
Robert E. Gill........................ 250,000 (2) 100.0% -- --
Jeffrey T. Gill....................... 250,000 (3) 100.0% -- --
All directors and executive
officers as a group.................. 250,000 100.0% -- --
</TABLE>
(1) GFP will convert the shares of GTC Preferred Stock held by it into GTC
Common Stock immediately prior to the Reorganization based upon the
conversion rate of 8.1 shares of GTC Common Stock for each share of GTC
Preferred Stock. Robert E. Gill, Jeffrey T. Gill, R. Scott Gill, Virginia
G. Gill and Patricia G. Gill own 19.3%, 32.3%, 28.0%, 19.7% and 0.1%,
respectively (99.4% in the aggregate), of the outstanding stock of GFP and,
therefore, may be deemed to have an indirect beneficial interest in all of
the shares of GTC Common Stock and GTC Preferred Stock owned by GFP. Robert
E. Gill is also a director of GTC and Jeffrey T. Gill is a director and an
executive officer of GTC. All of the shares of GTC Preferred Stock held by
GFP have been pledged by GFP to secure the credit facility between GTC and
Bank One, Kentucky, NA. Each of Robert E. Gill, Jeffrey T. Gill, R. Scott
Gill, Virginia G. Gill and Patricia G. Gill disclaims beneficial ownership
of any shares of GTC Common Stock and GTC Preferred Stock held by GFP,
other than the pro rata portion of such shares allocable to any of them and
their spouses.
(2) Consists of 250,000 shares of GTC Preferred Stock held by GFP which may be
deemed beneficially owned by Robert E. Gill and his spouse, but a portion
of which ownership is disclaimed as set forth in note (1) above.
(3) Consists of 250,000 shares of GTC Preferred Stock held by GFP which may be
deemed beneficially owned by Jeffrey T. Gill and his spouse, but a portion
of which ownership is disclaimed as set forth in note (1) above.
48
<PAGE>
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Robert E. Gill served as President and Chief Executive Officer of GTC until
February 28, 1997. He currently is a director of GTC and he also serves as
Chairman of the Board of GFP, a private holding company which holds controlling
interests in GTC, Tube Turns Technologies, Inc. ("TTT") and Bell, and as a
Director and executive officer of TTT and Bell. Robert E. Gill is the father of
Jeffrey T. Gill and R. Scott Gill. Jeffrey T. Gill, a director and Chairman of
the Board of GTC, also serves as a director and President and Chief Executive
Officer of GFP, as Chairman of the Board of TTT and as Chairman of the Board of
Bell. R. Scott Gill serves as Vice President and a director of GFP, and as a
director of TTT and Bell. Robert E. Gill (including those shares owned by his
wife Virginia G. Gill) and Jeffrey T. Gill (including those shares owned by his
wife Patricia G. Gill) and R. Scott Gill own 39.0%, 32.4%, and 28.0%
respectively, of the outstanding shares of GFP Common Stock.
GTC and its subsidiaries are parties to a tax sharing agreement with GFP
and were included in the consolidated federal income tax return of GFP from
GTC's inception through March 22, 1995. Effective March 23, 1995, as a result of
a decrease in GFP's ownership percentage of GTC, GTC did not meet the
80-percent-voting power and value requirements defined by the Internal Revenue
Code for affiliated group membership and ceased to be an includable member of
GFP's affiliated group. Effective March 29, 1996, as a result of an investment
by GFP of $1,000,000 in GTC as described below, GFP's ownership percentage in
GTC exceeded 80% and, therefore, GTC expects to be included as a member of GFP's
affiliated group as of that date.
On January 24, 1997, GTC filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with
the Commission regarding its proposal to merge with GFP, Bell, and TTT. In
connection with this proposed merger, the Board of GTC formed a special
committee of Independent Directors to evaluate the fairness of the transaction
to the unaffiliated shareholders of GTC and to make a recommendation to the
Board regarding the transaction. GTC filed several amendments to the
registration statement during 1997, and it was declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 1998. Shareholders voted in
favor or the merger on March 16, 1998 and it is expected to be effective on or
about March 30, 1998.
In connection with an amendment to GTC's credit agreement executed on March
28, 1997, but effective on December 1, 1996, GFP, invested $2,500,000 in GTC in
exchange for 250,000 shares of 8.5% cumulative convertible preferred stock of
GTC (the "Preferred Shares"). GFP, or any subsequent holders of record of each
of the Preferred Shares, is entitled to the rights and preferences stated in the
Statement of Designation of Relative Rights and Preferences filed by GTC with
the Florida Department of State on March 28, 1997 as part of the Third Amendment
to GTC's Articles of Incorporation. Such rights and preferences include the
right of the holder to, among other things: (i) exchange each of the Preferred
Shares for 8.1 shares of GTC Common Stock, which number was determined on March
28, 1997 by dividing the fair market value of GTC Common Stock into the value of
the Liquidation Preference of the Preferred Shares, and (ii) at any time after
GTC repays the amount it owes its lender under the credit agreement, the right
to put the Preferred Shares to GTC for repurchase at a price of $10.00 per
share, plus any accrued dividends and any interest thereon. Additionally, in
connection with the issuance of the Preferred Shares to GFP, GTC and GFP
executed a Stock Purchase and Registration Rights Agreement dated March 28,
1997, wherein GTC, among other things, granted GFP demand and incidental
registration rights for any shares of GTC Common Stock which are acquired by GFP
upon the conversion of the Preferred Shares.
On February 9, 1996, the assets of the instrumentation products business
unit of Metrum were sold by GTC to Bell for $10,104,000 cash and an earn-out
provision which provides for additional payments to GTC of up to $3,000,000 in
the event annual earnings before interest and taxes exceeds defined amounts
through December 31, 2000. During 1997, GTC earned $1,454,000 under the terms of
the earn-out provision. GTC recorded such amount as a contribution to its
capital in its 1997 financial statements.
Effective November 14, 1997, the Company, GFP and certain other
subsidiaries of GFP (collectively, the "Loan Parties") entered into a loan
agreement with a bank (the "1997 Agreement"). The
49
<PAGE>
1997 Agreement provides credit availability to the Loan Parties by means of a
total revolving credit line of $30,000,000 and a term note of $15,000,000. As of
December 31, 1997, $13,850,000 was available to the Loan Parties. The 1997
Agreement is secured by the assets of all of the Loan Parties. Under the terms
of the 1997 Agreement, the Loan Parties pay interest monthly at the LIBOR rate
plus a variable spread, or approximately 7.4% at December 31, 1997. The 1997
Agreement also requires compliance with a number of financial and non-financial
covenants and prohibits the Company from paying dividends. Principal payments on
the term note are due quarterly through September 30, 2002, which is also the
maturity date for the revolving credit line. Since the inception of the 1997
Agreement, the Company has not drawn upon the credit facility.
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
1. Financial Statements
The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed on the
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on Page 18.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is on page 51.
All other consolidated financial statement schedules have been omitted
because the required information is shown in the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto or they are not applicable.
50
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at Charged to Balance at
Beginning Costs and End of
of Period Expenses Deductions Period
---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Year ended December 31, 1997............................... $1,246,000 $ 303,000 $1,038,000 (1) $ 511,000
========== ========== ============= ==========
Year ended December 31, 1996............................... $ 783,000 $ 961,000 $ 498,000 (1) $1,246,000
========== ========== ============= ==========
Year ended December 31, 1995............................... $ 538,000 $1,293,000 $1,048,000 (1) $ 783,000
========== ========== ============= ==========
Reserve for inactive,
obsolete and unsalable
inventories:
Year ended December 31, 1997............................... $4,888,000 $1,192,000 $2,407,000 (2) $3,673,000
========== ========== ============= ==========
Year ended December 31, 1996............................... $8,606,000 $3,567,000 $7,285,000 (2) $4,888,000
========== ========== ============= ==========
Year ended December 31, 1995............................... $2,230,000 $6,939,000 $ 563,000 (2) $8,606,000
========== ========== ============= ==========
</TABLE>
- -----------------
(1) Uncollectible accounts written off.
(2) Inactive, obsolete and unsalable inventories written off.
51
<PAGE>
3. Exhibits
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Note Description
- ------- ---- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
2 11 Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization dated February 5, 1998.
2.1 (1) Purchase and Sale Agreement among Honeywell Inc.,
Defense Communications Products Corporation (prior name
of Registrant), and Group Financial Partners, Inc. dated
May 21, 1989.
2.2 (1) Purchase and Sale Agreement among Alliant Techsystems
Inc., MAC Acquisition I, Inc. and the Registrant dated
December 31, 1992.
2.3 (1) Purchase and Sale Agreement among Philips Electronic
North America Corporation and the Registrant dated June
25, 1993.
2.4 (2) Purchase Agreement among IBM-Brasil-Industria, Maquinas
e Servicos, Ltda. and Group Technologies Suporte de
Informatica Industria e Comercio Ltda. dated April 28,
1995.
2.4.1 (3) Amendment dated July 18, 1995 to the Purchase Agreement
among IBM-Brasil-Industria, Maquinase Servicos, Ltda.
and Group Technologies Suporte de Informatica
Industriae Comercio Ltda. dated April 28, 1995.
2.5 (2) Purchase and Sale Agreement among Metrum, Inc. and
MountainGate Data Systems, Inc. dated May 3, 1995.
2.6 (2) Purchase and Sale Agreement among Metrum, Inc. and
Sienna Imaging, Inc. dated June 6, 1995.
2.7 (4) Asset Purchase Agreement among Metrum, Inc., Registrant
and F.W. Bell, Inc. dated February 9, 1996.
2.8 (5) Asset Purchase Agreement among Registrant, Teklogix
Enterprises, Inc. and Teklogix International, Inc. dated
March 22, 1996.
2.10 (10) Stock and Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement among
Registrant, Group Technologies Mexican Holding Company,
SCI Systems, Inc., SCI Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
and SCI Holdings, Inc. dated June 30, 1997.
3.1 (1) Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
3.2 (1) Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
3.3 (1) Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant.
3.4 (1) Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation of the Registrant.
3.5 (7) Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation of the Registrant.
10.1 (5) Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement
between the Registrant and First Union Commercial
Corporation dated March 29, 1996.
10.1.1 (6) First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement, dated May 13, 1996.
10.1.2 (6) Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement, dated September 5, 1996.
</TABLE>
52
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
10.1.3 (6) Letter Agreement dated November 7, 1996 Pertaining to
Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement.
10.1.4 (7) Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement, dated March 28, 1997.
10.2 (12) 1997A Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between Bank
One, Kentucky, NA, BT Holdings, Inc., Bell Technologies,
Inc., Tube Turns Technologies, Inc., Group Technologies
Corporation, Metrum-D, Inc. and Group Financial
Partners, Inc. dated November 1, 1997 and effective
November 14, 1997.
10.2.1 (12) 1998A Amendment to Loan Documents, dated January 16,
1998.
10.3 (1) Form of U.S. Government Award/Contract.
10.4 (1) Preferred Supplier Purchase Agreement for Circuit Card
Assembly between the Registrant and Honeywell, Inc.
dated July 1, 1990.
10.5 (1) Standard OEM Purchase Agreement between Kulicke and
Soffa Industries, Inc. and Registrant dated March 16,
1993.
10.6 (7) OEM Purchase Agreement between Instruments SA, Inc. and
Registrant dated December 11, 1996.
10.7 (1) Master Lease Agreement between General Electric Capital
Corporation and the Registrant dated April 1, 1993.
10.8 (1) Lease between John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company
and Honeywell, Inc. dated April 27, 1979; related Notice
of Assignment from John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Company to Sweetwell Industrial Associates, L.P., dated
July 10, 1986; related Assignment and Assumption of
Lease between Honeywell, Inc. and Defense Communications
Products Corporation (prior name of Registrant) dated
May 21, 1989; and related Amendment I to Lease Agreement
between Sweetwell Industries Associates, L.P. and the
Registrant dated October 25, 1991, regarding Tampa
industrial park property.
10.9 (1) Lease between the Registrant and TMC Properties, Inc.
dated August 24, 1994, regarding North 46th Street
Property.
10.9.1 (2) Amendment No.1 to Lease between Registrant and TMC
Properties, Inc. dated August 24, 1994 regarding North
46th Street Property.
10.10 (1) Agreements between the Registrant and International
Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and
Helpers of America Local Union No. 930 dated September
25, 1993.
10.11 (1) Agreements between the Registrant and International
Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and
Helpers of America Local Union No. 930 dated November
22, 1994.
10.12 (7) Group Technologies Corporation Stock Option Plan,
Restated effective December 17, 1996, dated January 22,
1990.
10.13 (3) Group Technologies Corporate Management Deferred
Compensation Plan Restated effective October 16, 1995,
dated August 29, 1995.
10.14 (9) Group Technologies Corporation Independent Directors'
Stock Option Plan Restated effective June 25, 1997,
dated October 27, 1994.
10.15 (9) Group Technologies Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan
for Key Employees Restated effective June 25, 1997,
dated October 27, 1994.
</TABLE>
53
<PAGE>
10.16 (9) Group Technologies Corporation Independent Directors
Compensation Program Restated effective June 25, 1997,
dated September 1, 1995.
10.17 (11) Separation letter agreement dated December 10, 1996
between the Registrant and Carl P. McCormick.
10.18 (7) Stock Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights
Agreement between Registrant and Group Financial
Partners, Inc. dated March 28, 1997.
10.19 (8) Stock Purchase Right Agreement dated April 7, 1997
between the Registrant and Thomas W. Lovelock.
10.20 (9) Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Thomas W. Lovelock dated June 23, 1997.
10.21 (9) Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and
James G. Cocke dated June 23, 1997.
10.22 (9) Special Bonus Agreement by and between the Registrant
and David D. Johnson dated June 25, 1997.
21 (11) Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors
for the Registrant.
27 Financial Data Schedule (for SEC use only).
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 filed May 18, 1994 (Registration No. 33-76326).
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended July 2, 1995 filed on August 16, 1995.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended October 2, 1995 filed on November 15, 1995.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed on
February 23, 1996.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1995 filed on April 1, 1996.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended September 29, 1996 filed on November 13, 1996.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1996 filed on March 31, 1997.
(8) Incorporated by referenced to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended March 30, 1997 filed on May 14, 1997.
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended June 29, 1997 filed on August 13, 1997.
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed on July
15, 1997.
(11) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus forming a part of the Registrant's Form S-4
(No. 333-20299) filed on January 24, 1997, as amended September 24,
1997, as amended December 5, 1997, as amended January 12, 1998, as
amended February 9, 1998, as amended February 12, 1998.
54
<PAGE>
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form S-4 (No. 333-20299)
filed on January 24, 1997, as amended September 24, 1997, as amended
December 5, 1997, as amended January 12, 1998, as amended February 9, 1998,
as amended February 12, 1998.
55
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 26,
1998.
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(Registrant)
/s/ Thomas W. Lovelock
----------------------------------------
(Thomas W. Lovelock)
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:
Principal Executive Officer:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
/s/ Thomas W. Lovelock March 26, 1998
- ---------------------------------------
(Thomas W. Lovelock)
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer:
/s/ David D. Johnson March 26, 1998
- ---------------------------------------
(David D. Johnson)
Directors:
/s/ Henry F. Frigon March 26, 1998
- ---------------------------------------
(Henry F. Frigon)
/s/ Jeffrey T. Gill March 26, 1998
- ---------------------------------------
(Jeffrey T. Gill)
/s/ Robert E. Gill March 26, 1998
- ---------------------------------------
(Robert E. Gill)
/s/ Thomas W. Lovelock March 26, 1998
- ---------------------------------------
(Thomas W. Lovelock)
/s/ Sidney R. Petersen March 26, 1998
- ---------------------------------------
(Sidney R. Petersen)
/s/ Roger W. Johnson March 26, 1998
- ---------------------------------------
(Roger W. Johnson)
</TABLE>
56
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8) pertaining to Group Technologies Corporation Stock Option Plan dated
January 22, 1990 (No. 333-07111), Group Technologies Corporation Independent
Director's Stock Option Plan (No. 333-07199) and Group Technologies Corporation
1994 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees (No. 333-07195) of our report dated
March 6, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Group Technologies Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tampa, Florida
March 24, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, RESPECTIVELY, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997
<CASH> 3,090
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 11,742
<ALLOWANCES> 511
<INVENTORY> 21,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 39,077
<PP&E> 29,858
<DEPRECIATION> 21,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 47,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 27,018
<BONDS> 0
2,500
0
<COMMON> 26,476
<OTHER-SE> (8,630)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 47,364
<SALES> 113,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 113,356
<CGS> 112,202
<TOTAL-COSTS> 112,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (3,474)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 1,069
<INCOME-PRETAX> (3,044)
<INCOME-TAX> 152
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (3,196)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (3,196)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED> (0.20)
</TABLE>
