<PAGE>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
-- REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
-- EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997
OR
-- TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 0-26308
FANTOM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Ontario, Canada
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
1110 Hansler Road, Welland, Ontario L3B 5S1
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NONE
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
COMMON SHARES, WITHOUT PAR VALUE
--------------------------------
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d)
of the Act: NONE
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of the issuer's capital or common
stock covered by this registration statement: 6,811,693 COMMON SHARES AS OF
JUNE 30, 1997
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days:
X Yes No
- -- --
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item registrant has elected to
follow:
Item 17 X Item 18
- -- --
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXCHANGE RATES OF THE CANADIAN DOLLAR............................. 1
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS........................................... 2
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY........................................... 12
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS................................................. 12
ITEM 4. CONTROL OF REGISTRANT............................................. 12
ITEM 5. NATURE OF TRADING MARKET.......................................... 14
ITEM 6. EXCHANGE CONTROLS AND OTHER LIMITATIONS AFFECTING
SECURITY HOLDERS.................................................. 15
ITEM 7. TAXATION.......................................................... 16
ITEM 8. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA........................................... 17
ITEM 9. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS............................... 20
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT.............................. 28
ITEM 11. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS............................ 31
ITEM 12. OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SECURITIES FROM REGISTRANT OR SUBSIDIARIES.... 37
ITEM 13. INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT IN CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS.................... 39
ITEM 14. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED........................ 39
ITEM 15. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES................................... 39
ITEM 16. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND CHANGES IN SECURITY FOR
REGISTERED SECURITIES............................................. 39
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.............................................. 39
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.............................................. 39
ITEM 19. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS................................. 40
<PAGE>
EXCHANGE RATES OF THE CANADIAN DOLLAR
Fantom Technologies Inc. publishes its financial statements in Canadian
dollars. Financial information in this annual report is expressed in Canadian
dollars, unless otherwise noted. References to "Cdn$" or "$" are to Canadian
dollars. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high
and low exchange rates, the average of the month end exchange rates and the
period-end exchange rate of the Canadian dollar in exchange for United States
dollars, based upon the inverse of exchange rates reported by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York as the noon buying rates in New York City for cable
transfers payable in Canadian dollars as certified for customs purposes. On
November 10, 1997, the noon buying rate (expressed in U.S. dollars) was Cdn.
$1.00 = U.S.$0.7107.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
(prices given in U.S. dollars)
High .7513 .7527 .7457 .7834 .8453
Low .7145 .7235 .7023 .7166 .7761
Average .7308 .7349 .7259 .7436 .7986
Period End .7241 .7322 .7279 .7233 .7798
-1-
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
THE COMPANY
Fantom Technologies Inc. (the "Company") was formed by articles of
amalgamation on May 12, 1986 under the BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT (Ontario). The
articles of the Company were amended on May 1, 1997 to change the Company's name
from its former name of Iona Appliances Inc. The Company has one operating
subsidiary, Fantom Technologies Direct, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary
incorporated under the BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT (Ontario). The Company's
registered and principal executive office is located at 1110 Hansler Road,
Welland, Ontario, Canada, L3B 5S1.
The Company's fiscal year ends on June 30 of each year.
BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
PRODUCTS
The Company's principal product line currently consists of its
full-size, upright, dual-cyclonic vacuum cleaners. The Company also
continues to sell stick vacuums and dual-cyclonic, carpet dry-cleaning
machines; however, manufacturing of these products has recently been
discontinued and the Company intends to discontinue their sale once existing
inventory is depleted.
STICK VACUUMS. The Company, through predecessor companies, played an
important role in developing the lightweight stick vacuum business in Canada,
with its products being merchandised by several leading Canadian retailers.
These products are sold under the IONA-Registered Trademark-,
ELECTRIKBROOM-Registered Trademark- and SPEEDVAC-Registered Trademark-
trademarks. With the development of the Company's dual-cyclonic products,
coupled with increased competitive activity in the stick-vacuum segment, the
stick vacuums have become increasingly less significant to the Company's
operations, amounting to less than 2% of sales in the Company's fiscal year
ended June 30, 1997.
HAND-HELD VACUUMS. A corded hand-held vacuum was also marketed by the
Company commencing in the mid 1980's. This product had a market share
significantly less than that of the Company's stick vacuum line of products and
the Company ceased the manufacturing of this product in March, 1996.
-2-
<PAGE>
DUAL-CYCLONIC PRODUCTS. Starting in 1986, the Company committed itself
to developing new cleaning products based on patented, dual-cyclonic vacuuming
technology. The Company believes that this technology is significant for two
reasons: (a) it eliminates the use of filter bags; and (b) it provides constant
peak cleaning power versus the declining cleaning power often experienced with
conventional vacuums using filter bags.
In 1988, the Company introduced its first dual-cyclonic product, a
carpet dry-cleaning machine. This product is currently sold under the
CAPTURE-Registered Trademark- and FANTOM-Registered Trademark- trademarks.
CAPTURE-Registered Trademark- is a registered trademark of Milliken Research
Corporation and has been licensed to the Company for use with the dual-cyclonic
carpet dry-cleaning machine. The Company also currently distributes certain
CAPTURE-Registered Trademark- carpet cleaning products manufactured by Milliken
& Company.
In 1991, the Company introduced its second dual-cyclonic product, an
upright vacuum cleaner called the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum. This
product gave the Company its first entry into the mainstream, full-size, vacuum
cleaner market.
In January 1996, the Company commenced marketing a new model of the
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum called the FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
FURY-Registered Trademark- vacuum. This is a smaller, lighter version of the
original FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum and has a lower retail price point.
In March 1996, the Company began shipping to the U.S. market a more powerful
version of the original FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum. This product is
called the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- THUNDER-Registered Trademark- vacuum.
The Company previously sold a similar version of the original FANTOM-Registered
Trademark- vacuum to Sears, Roebuck and Co. under private label arrangements,
and currently sells similar versions of the FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
FURY-Registered Trademark- and FANTOM-Registered Trademark- THUNDER-Registered
Trademark- models to Sears, Roebuck and Co. under private label arrangements.
Included among the current features of household models of the
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- FURY-Registered Trademark- and FANTOM-Registered
Trademark- THUNDER-Registered Trademark- vacuums are the following: (a) a
two-stage motor, 10-amps in the case of the FANTOM-Registered
Trademark-FURY-Registered Trademark- vacuum and 12-amps in the case of the
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- THUNDER-Registered Trademark- vacuum; (b) a
handle which detaches and becomes a cleaning wand; (c) a 5:1 stretch, steel
reinforced hose; (d) a HEPA filter; (e) a minimum of three on-board
attachments, including a crevice tool, a dusting/upholstery brush and a floor
nozzle; (f) twin headlights; (g) a quick release, see-through bin designed
for convenient emptying; (h) a height adjustment dial; (i) a How-to-Use
video; and (j) a two-year limited warranty.
The HEPA filter is designed to clean the air exiting the vacuum and
capture impurities such as bacteria, pollen, plant-spores, molds, yeast
cells, dust mites and lung-damaging particles. The HEPA filter is made of 100%
-3-
<PAGE>
glass-microfiber media and manufactured to rigid specifications. Each filter
is certified for efficiency by the manufacturer.
Until the Fall of 1993, the main marketing effort behind the Company's
CAPTURE-Registered Trademark- carpet dry-cleaning machine and household models
of its FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum was to sell them to retailers in the
United States and Canada, which retailers typically had trained floor sales
personnel to demonstrate the products to consumers or catalogs in which to
present them. This effort was hampered by a marketplace which became
increasingly competitive and which forced several retailers to reduce their
trained floor sales personnel, a resource which the Company needed to
demonstrate effectively the features and benefits of its products. In response,
the Company developed a communications strategy for its FANTOM-Registered
Trademark- vacuum aimed at significantly building consumer awareness and
expanding retail distribution. This strategy utilizes infomercials, a
television format which lends itself to demonstrating the features and benefits
of the Company's products.
In the Fall of 1993, the Company commenced airing a 30-minute,
direct-response TV infomercial on U.S. television for its FANTOM-Registered
Trademark-vacuum. No similar media was purchased in Canada due to regulatory
restrictions on the airing of full-motion, long-form commercials. In
February 1995, the Company commenced airing short-form (60 second and 120
second) direct-response TV spots in the U.S. to supplement its 30-minute
infomercial. In February 1996, the Company commenced airing in the U.S. a
new 30-minute TV infomercial for its FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
FURY-Registered Trademark- vacuum and, in March 1996, new short-form (60
second and 120 second) TV spots for this product. In June 1996, the Company
commenced airing in the U.S. short-form (60 second and 120 second) TV spots
for its FANTOM-Registered Trademark- THUNDER-Registered Trademark- vacuum.
In March, 1996, the Company commenced airing in Canada the TV infomercial and
short-form TV spots for its FANTOM-Registered Trademark-FURY-Registered
Trademark- vacuum. This followed the easing of regulatory restrictions on
the airing of full-motion, long-form commercials in Canada.
Sales of dual-cyclonic products (including spare parts and accessories)
through all channels of distribution totaled $147.6 million in the Company's
fiscal year ended June 30, 1997, compared with $93.7 million in fiscal 1996 and
$53.0 million in fiscal 1995 with over 98% of such sales being to customers in
the United States in all three years. Direct-response television sales in
fiscal 1997 were $23.0 million compared to $18.4 million in fiscal 1996 and
$22.1 million in fiscal 1995. See "Management Discussion of Operating Results".
RAW MATERIALS AND SUPPLIERS
The Company currently conducts product assembly operations at its
Welland, Ontario facility. The Company relies on several different vendors
-4-
<PAGE>
to satisfy its plastic injection molding needs. With the exception of
motors, the raw materials and components used by the Company in its
manufacturing operations are readily available from a number of Canadian,
United States and offshore suppliers. The Company is largely dependent on a
single supplier, Ametek, Inc., for motors. The Company does not have any
formal agreement with Ametek, Inc. regarding the Company's purchase of
motors. The Company believes it has an excellent relationship with Ametek,
Inc., and has not experienced any significant quality or supply problems
during its relationship with Ametek, Inc. Nevertheless, the Company's
inability to acquire the type and number of motors needed to satisfy demand
for its products could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial condition and results of operations. The Company has identified a
second source for motors and intends to purchase some of its requirements for
its next new product (the FANTOM-Registered Trademark-LIGHTNING-Registered
Trademark- vacuum) from this source.
DUAL-CYCLONIC TECHNOLOGY
The Company's upright vacuum cleaners and the Company's carpet
dry-cleaning machine are based on patented dual-cyclonic technology and
related know-how which the Company licenses from Prototypes Limited and
Notetry Limited (collectively, the "Licensor") and is protected by several
patents in the United States and Canada, including (without limitation)
Canadian Patent Nos. 1,321,960, 1,238,869, 1,241,158 and 1,182,613, and
United States Patent Nos. 4,853,011, 4,826,515, 4,643,748, 5,558,697,
4,853,008 and 4,593,429. The dual-cyclonic technology involves two cyclones
through which air whirls in sequence to separate dirt from the airstream
instead of forcing it through a traditional filter bag. Large dirt particles
are hurled to the edge of the outer cyclone and smaller dirt particles are
hurled to the edge of the inner cyclone.
The Company has entered into a series of technology transfer
agreements with the Licensor pursuant to which the Company has the exclusive
right (except for the Amway Corporation ("Amway") license discussed below) to
sell upright vacuum-cleaning devices utilizing the dual-cyclonic technology
in the United States and Canada, and the non-exclusive right to sell upright
dry-powder carpet shampooers utilizing the dual-cyclonic technology in the
United States and Canada. In addition, in September of 1996 the Company
entered into an agreement with the Licensor expanding the Company's rights in
the United States and Canada to include the exclusive right to sell canister
and back-pack vacuums utilizing the dual-cyclonic technology. The Company
also has the non-exclusive right to manufacture upright, canister and
back-pack vacuum-cleaning devices and upright dry-powder carpet shampooers
utilizing the dual-cyclonic technology in the United States, Canada and other
countries, not including Japan.
-5-
<PAGE>
The Company's right to continue using the dual-cyclonic technology is
subject to the continued performance of its obligations under the various
technology transfer agreements, which include an on-going obligation to pay
royalties based upon a fixed percentage of sales of products utilizing the
dual-cyclonic technology. In some instances, the Company must pay a minimum
annual royalty in order to preserve the exclusive or non-exclusive nature of
its rights to use the dual-cyclonic technology. Other than the Company's
obligation to make royalty payments and submit periodic reports to the
Licensor substantiating the basis for such royalty payments, the Company has
no other material on-going obligations under the technology transfer
agreements. In the absence of the Company's bankruptcy or a default by the
Company in the performance of its obligations under the technology transfer
agreements, the licensing arrangements may not be terminated by the Licensor
and continue in effect until the last of the patents covered by the
agreements expires. The Company's obligations under the technology transfer
agreements expire upon the expiration of the various agreements. The first
to expire of the basic patents in the United States for the dual-cyclonic
technology does not expire until June 10, 2003, assuming that all necessary
renewal fees are paid and such patent is not invalidated by a court action
prior to such time.
The Company believes that the continued validity of the dual-cyclonic
patents will allow the Company to protect effectively its right to use and
exploit the dual-cyclonic technology in the United States and Canada. Most
of the patents have been in existence for approximately ten years, during
which time the Licensor and the Company have diligently protected their
rights in and to the dual-cyclonic technology. As part of a comprehensive
settlement with Amway in 1991 arising out of various legal proceedings
relating to the dual-cyclonic technology, Amway was granted the perpetual
right to manufacture and sell upright vacuum cleaners utilizing the
dual-cyclonic technology in the United States and Canada for household use
only. Amway has an on-going obligation to pay royalties on sales of
dual-cyclonic products based upon a fixed percentage of Amway's regularly
listed selling price to its distributors. Amway may market and sell
dual-cyclonic products only through Amway's private-party distributors and
direct-mail catalogs, but by no other means. Due to the significant
limitations imposed on Amway's ability to market and sell products utilizing
the dual-cyclonic technology, the Company does not believe that Amway's right
to use the dual-cyclonic technology will have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition and results of operations. The Company
believes that, to date, Amway's sales of dual-cyclonic upright vacuum
cleaners in the United States have not constituted a significant percentage
of the total upright vacuum cleaners sold in the United States.
-6-
<PAGE>
The loss of the Company's right to use and exploit the dual-cyclonic
technology for vacuum cleaning devices would have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
Because of market recognition achieved by the dual-cyclonic technology,
the Company expects competitors to develop cyclonic vacuum cleaners. In early
1997, a competitive vacuum incorporating a form of cyclonic action was launched
in Europe and this product is currently being introduced in North America. The
Company is uncertain what effect this competitive product, or other competitive
cyclonic products which might be introduced in the future, will have on its
sales and results of operations.
EMPLOYEES
The Company had approximately 400 employees as of June 30, 1997. Of
these employees, 80%, 11%, 6% and 2% were engaged in production,
marketing/sales, administration and engineering, respectively. As of June 30,
1997, approximately 300 of the employees in the Company's manufacturing plant
were unionized and were members of The United Steel Workers of America. The
Company has an agreement with the United Steel Workers which expires March 31,
1999. The Company's relationship with the union has been good and uneventful,
except for a week long strike in December 1993. The strike occurred after the
union had rejected the Company's first contract offer.
CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
Over the last few years, a small number of retailers have accounted
for a significant portion of the Company's total sales. In fiscal 1997, five
customers accounted for 61% of the Company's revenue. In fiscal 1996, a
different mix of five customers also accounted for 61% of the Company's
revenue. One specific customer accounted for 29% and 33% of sales in fiscal
1997 and fiscal 1996, respectively.
The Company is continuing to expand its retail distribution of the
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum product line in the United States and Canada
with the assistance of direct-response television commercials. While this
expansion is intended to increase the number of retailers the Company sells to,
it may not reduce the Company's dependence on a small number of retailers for a
significant portion of its sales.
-7-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30
---------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ---------- ----------
(in dollars)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
TOTAL SALES 150,213,517 98,428,527 59,421,732
SALES BY METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION
Total direct-response television sales 23,007,342 18,356,727 22,132,273
Total sales to retailers and distributors 127,206,175 80,071,800 37,289,459
SALES BY TERRITORY
Canada Total 4,356,025 5,205,169 6,787,371
Stick and hand-held products 2,538,979 4,692,200 6,447,382
Dual-cyclonic products 1,817,046 512,969 326,265
All other - - 13,724
United States Total 145,857,492 93,223,358 52,634,361
Stick and hand-held products - 32,890 -
Dual-cyclonic products 145,857,492 93,190,468 52,633,035
All other - - 1,326
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30
---------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ---------- ----------
(in dollars)
SALES OF DUAL-CYCLONIC PRODUCTS
Total 147,674,538 93,703,437 52,959,300
Fantom-Registered Trademark- vacuum 146,664,274 92,116,168 52,237,251
Fantom-Registered Trademark- vacuum direct-response 23,007,342 18,356,729 22,132,273
Fantom-Registered Trademark- vacuum retail and distributors 123,656,932 73,759,439 30,104,978
Capture-Registered Trademark- carpet shampooer 610,077 791,087 666,502
Other Capture-Registered Trademark- carpet cleaning products 400,187 796,182 55,547
</TABLE>
SALES AND MARKETING
The Company's main products are its FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
vacuums and the Company sells the products in two ways: (a) to end-users
through direct-response television; and (b) to various types of retailers,
including mass merchants, catalog and catalog-showroom retailers, warehouse
clubs, television shopping networks and independent vacuum dealers. The
independent vacuum dealers also serve as product repair centers. The Company
uses a combination of its own sales personnel and manufacturers'
representatives to call on accounts. It also has a small group of product
trainers to instruct in-store sales personnel on the features and benefits of
its products. In addition, the Company maintains a special toll-free call
centre in its Welland, Ontario plant to handle inquiries that
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- owners and potential purchasers have about its
products. The Company has been focusing on increasing distribution of its
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums in self-service retail outlets, and has
been relying on the consumer awareness generated by its direct-response
television campaign, exposure on television shopping networks, and trade
promotions, to drive retail sales in these accounts.
The Company's FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums are currently listed
in the United States by prominent retailers including B. J. Wholesale Inc.,
Costco Wholesale Inc., Damark International Inc., Fingerhut Companies Inc., Fred
-8-
<PAGE>
Meyer, Inc., Home Shopping Network Inc., JC Penney Company, Inc., Kmart
Corporation, Kohl's Department Stores, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Service
Merchandise Company, Inc., Shopko Stores Inc., Spiegel, Inc., Target Stores,
The Caldor Corporation and Meijer Inc. They are also sold by several hundred
independent vacuum dealers. In Canada, the FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
vacuums are listed by Home Hardware Stores Ltd., T. Eaton Co. Ltd., The
Shopping Channel, Kmart Canada Limited, Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited,
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Zellers Inc.
The Company's FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum business is more
developed in the United States than in Canada due mainly to the following:
(a) the regulatory restrictions which existed on the airing of
full-motion, long-form TV commercials in Canada until late 1994;
(b) the regulatory restrictions which existed on live selling on TV
shopping channels in Canada until early 1995; and
(c) the lack of availability of attractively priced air time in Canada, at
times of the day and on days of the week that have worked well for the
Company in the U.S. market.
During the past two years, the Company has begun developing a market for
its FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums in Canada and believes it is positioned
to continue this growth.
NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
The Company conducts on-going new product development activities
through an engineering team which currently has a complement of 12 personnel.
Capital expenditures for new products were $2.1 million in fiscal 1997, $3.4
million in fiscal 1996 and $1.4 million in fiscal 1995.
The Company is currently preparing to introduce a major line
extension to the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum line in the United
States and Canada. This dual-cyclonic product will compete in the canister
segment of the market and is called the FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
LIGHTNING-Registered Trademark-vacuum. Shipments are expected to commence in
the Fall of 1997.
Included among the standard features of household models of the
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- LIGHTNING-Registered Trademark- canister will be
the following: (a) a 6-foot, electrified hose and metal wand, which will
attach to a powerhead that features a rotating brush for cleaning carpets;
the rotating brush can be turned off for cleaning bare floors; (b) an
electronic system in the powerhead that will turn the rotating brush off and
prevent the drive belt from breaking, should the rotating brush become
jammed; (c) a certified HEPA filter; (d) a retractable
-9-
<PAGE>
power cord; (e) three on-board attachments; (f) an ergonomically designed
handle; (g) an easily released, see-through bin designed for convenient
emptying; (h) a height adjustment dial; (i) a how-to-use video; and (j) a
two-year limited warranty.
Due to the uncertainties associated with a new product launch, the
Company is not able to forecast sales of the FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
LIGHTNING-Registered Trademark- vacuum with any reasonable degree of accuracy.
It is also not possible to predict at this time to what extent, if any, sales of
the other FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums might be negatively affected by
the introduction of the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- LIGHTNING-Registered
Trademark- vacuum.
Capital expenditures for tooling and for an assembly line for the
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- LIGHTNING-Registered Trademark- vacuum are
estimated to be approximately $4.3 million. Marketing expenses for the
production of an infomercial and for other launch materials are estimated at
approximately $0.7 million. As of June 30, 1997, the Company had spent $2.1
million towards the completion of this project. The Company is planning to
manufacture the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- LIGHTNING-Registered Trademark-
vacuum in its Welland, Ontario facility. The Company has been financing the
capital expenditures and working capital requirements for this project from its
line of credit with a Canadian chartered bank and from its cash on hand. The
Company believes that its current borrowing limit of $17 million under its line
of credit will be sufficient to provide for its cash requirements relating to
the development of the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- LIGHTNING-Registered
Trademark- product.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The electric floor-care industry is highly competitive and has several
product segments including canister, upright and stick vacuums, hand-held
vacuums, extractors and wet/dry vacuums. Products are sold in a variety of
retail outlets, on a door-to-door basis and through television shopping networks
and various direct-response formats.
Industry shipments of full-sized vacuums (canister, upright and stick
vacuums) within the United States in calendar 1996, as estimated by the Vacuum
Cleaner Manufacturers Association, were 16.2 million units compared with 14.9
million units for 1995 and 14.1 million units for 1994. Shipments of upright
vacuums in 1996 were 11.2 million units compared with 10.5 million units for
1995 and 9.9 million for 1994. The Canadian market is estimated by the Company
to be less than 10% of the size of the U.S. market.
The Company is aware of several major competitors in the United States
and Canada including Bissell Inc.; The Hoover Company; Eureka
-10-
<PAGE>
Company; Matsushita Appliance Corporation; and Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
Some of these competitors have recently introduced new products which are
competing at similar price points with the Company's Fantom-Registered
Trademark- Fury-Registered Trademark- and Fantom-Registered Trademark-
Thunder-Registered Trademark-vacuums. One such competitive product, the
introduction of which appears to have been heavily supported by media
advertising, is based on bag technology. Another new competitive product
incorporates a form of cyclonic filtering system. The Company is uncertain
what effect these new competitive products, or future ones which could be
introduced, will have on its sales and results of operations.
BUSINESS STRATEGIES
During the next 12 months, the Company intends to focus on increasing
its sales in the United States and Canada by employing the following strategies:
(a) continuing to focus on expanding distribution and promotional activity
for its existing models with retailers;
(b) continuing to employ direct-response television, and to explore other
direct-response formats, not only to generate direct sales but also to
build broad-scale consumer awareness and demand for FANTOM-Registered
Trademark- products at the retail level; and
(c) introducing the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- LIGHTNING-Registered
Trademark- canister vacuum.
The Company intends to continue to focus on developing and introducing
further new vacuum cleaning products in the upright, canister and back-pack
categories utilizing its proprietary, dual-cyclonic technology. The development
of these additional products is still in the preliminary stage. Accordingly,
the impact on sales or results of operations, as well as capital requirements,
have not yet been determined.
The Company intends to market a range of dual-cyclonic vacuum
cleaners under the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- brand name. The goal is to
firmly establish a "FANTOM-Registered Trademark-" presence in the marketplace
and in the minds of consumers, by offering a line of FANTOM-Registered
Trademark-vacuums, and to make the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- brand name
stand for a unique, superior, cleaning machine, not only in how it operates,
i.e. its dual-cyclonic technology, but also in the benefits it offers
consumers: no filter bags; a see-through collection bin; constant cleaning
power; handle-to-hose cleaning wand for the upright models; and the HEPA
filtration system.
In the longer term, the Company believes it should seek new product
lines which will allow it to capitalize on its expertise in
-11-
<PAGE>
manufacturing and marketing consumer, durable products. Although preliminary
investigation of possible options has commenced, no decisions have been made
about any specific opportunity.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Company's manufacturing operations and administrative offices are
located at a facility which it owns in Welland, Ontario, Canada. The
facility is situated on approximately 53 acres of land, which is subject to a
mortgage in favour of a Canadian chartered bank. The Welland, Ontario
facility was constructed in 1973 and has approximately 78,000 square feet of
production and warehousing space and 12,000 square feet of office space. All
of the Company's continuing motorized products are currently made at this
facility. The Company leases a small sales office in Toronto, Ontario which
houses marketing and sales personnel. The lease on the Toronto sales office
will expire in 1999.
The Company provided additional space in 1996 for manufacturing its
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums at its Welland plant by out-sourcing all
of its finished goods warehousing. At the beginning of July 1996, the
Company implemented the SAP enterprise-information-technology system (the
"System") at a cost of approximately $1.2 million. The System has improved
efficiencies of the Company's total operations. Also in 1996, the Company
introduced kanbans to control better its inventory of raw materials. The
Company believes its current production facilities as presently configured
are suitable for an annual sales volume in excess of $250 million. Based
upon annual capacity of $250 million and the Company's total sales of $150
million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997, the Company's production
facilities were 60% utilized during such period.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not involved in any material pending legal proceeding,
other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Company's business.
The Company is not aware of any material proceedings currently being
contemplated by governmental authorities.
ITEM 4. CONTROL OF COMPANY
As of October 15, 1997, there were 7,905,001 common shares ("Common
Shares") and 994,810 series 1, class A preferred shares ("Series 1 Shares") of
the Company issued and outstanding. Holders of Common Shares are entitled to
vote on all matters requiring the vote or consent of the
-12-
<PAGE>
shareholders of the Company. The Series 1 Shares possess equal voting rights
on a share-for-share basis with the Common Shares, except with respect to the
election of directors in respect of which the holders of the Series 1 Shares
possess the right, voting as a series, to elect two directors and no other
voting rights for directors so long as there are no fewer than 615,000 Series
1 Shares outstanding. If at any time there are fewer than 615,000 Series 1
Shares outstanding, the holders of Series 1 Shares have the same right to
vote for the election of directors as the holders of the Common Shares, the
Series 1 Shares and the Common Shares being deemed to constitute one class of
shares for such purpose. The Series 1 Shares are fully convertible into
Common Shares on a share-for-share basis, subject to comprehensive
anti-dilution protection for the holders of the Series 1 Shares.
To the knowledge of the Company, the following table sets forth the
names of shareholders owning of record or beneficially, directly or indirectly,
more than 10% of the outstanding Common Shares and Series 1, Class A preferred
shares of the Company and the number of Common Shares and Series 1, Class A
preferred shares owned directly and indirectly by the directors and officers of
the Company as a group as at October 15, 1997:
Percentage of
Outstanding
Common
Percentage Percentage Shares
of of and
Common Outstanding Series 1 Outstanding Series 1
Shares Common Shares Series 1 Shares
Name Owned Shares Owned Shares Combined(1)
---- ------ ----------- -------- ----------- -----------
International
Network
Fund Limited
Partnership(2)(3)(4) 1,000,000(5) 12.7% 994,810 100% 22.4%
Directors and
Officers as a
group 1,056,828 13.4% 0 0% 11.9%
NOTES:
- -----
(1) Includes all Common Shares and Series 1 Shares owned by each person listed
and by the directors and officers as a group as a percentage of the
aggregate number of outstanding Common Shares and Series 1 Shares as of
October 15, 1997.
(2) All shares are held beneficially and of record, except as set out in Note
5.
(3) An investment fund managed by Advent International Corporation.
(4) After giving effect to the exercise of 1,000,000 Class C Special Warrants
of International Network Fund Limited Partnership ("INF") (the "Special
Warrants") issued on September 30, 1997, each exercisable into one Common
Share of the Company, INF would not hold any Common Shares and it would
hold 12.0% of the aggregate number of outstanding Common Shares and Series
1 Shares.
(5) INF has delivered all 1,000,000 of these Common Shares to CIBC Mellon Trust
Company (the "Trustee") pursuant to the terms of a Class C Special Warrant
Indenture (the "Special Warrant
-13-
<PAGE>
Indenture") dated as of September 30, 1997 between INF and the Trustee,
to be held in the name of the Trustee for the benefit of the holders of
the Special Warrants in accordance with the Special Warrant Indenture.
Upon exercise of the Special Warrants, these 1,000,000 Common Shares
will be transferred to the holders of the Special Warrants.
ITEM 5. NATURE OF TRADING MARKET
The Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the Nasdaq Stock
Market and on The Toronto Stock Exchange, the exclusive non-United States
trading market for such securities. The Company's Common Shares commenced
trading on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market on November 20, 1995 and on the Nasdaq
National Market on March 18, 1996. The high and low sales prices for the
Company's Common Shares on the Nasdaq Stock Market during each quarter of the
1997 fiscal year are as follows:
HIGH LOW
---- ---
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997
-----------------
Fourth Quarter US$10.625 US$8.250
Third Quarter US$8.625 US$6.500
Second Quarter US$9.125 US$6.750
First Quarter US$7.938 US$5.375
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1996
-----------------
Fourth Quarter US$7 15/16 US$5 3/4
Third Quarter US$6 1/4 US$4 3/4
Second Quarter US$5 3/4 US$4 1/4
The following table shows the high and low sales prices for the
Company's Common Shares on The Toronto Stock Exchange during each quarter of
the 1997 and 1996 fiscal years.
HIGH LOW
---- ---
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997
-----------------
Fourth Quarter $15.00 $11.75
Third Quarter $11.90 $9.00
Second Quarter $12.65 $9.20
First Quarter $10.95 $7.00
-14-
<PAGE>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1996
-----------------
Fourth Quarter $11.10 $7.50
Third Quarter $8.30 $6.60
Second Quarter $7.70 $4.75
First Quarter $6.30 $4.05
Based on information supplied to the Company by CIBC Mellon Trust
Company, the Company's transfer agent, the Company estimates that on September
30, 1997, 12 persons who held 972,084 Common Shares were residents of the United
States, representing approximately 13.1% of the outstanding Common Shares as of
such date.
ITEM 6. EXCHANGE CONTROLS AND OTHER LIMITATIONS AFFECTING SECURITY
HOLDERS
There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Canada that
restrict the export or import of capital, including, but not limited to, foreign
exchange controls, or that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other
payments to nonresident holders of the Common Shares, other than withholding
tax requirements. Any such remittances, however, are subject to withholding
tax.
There is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by the charter or
other constituent documents of the Company on the right of nonresident or
foreign owners to hold or vote Common Shares, other than as provided in the
Investment Canada Act (Canada) (the "Investment Canada Act"). The following
summarizes the principal features of the Investment Canada Act.
The Investment Canada Act requires certain "non-Canadian" (as defined in
the Investment Canada Act) individuals, governments, corporations and other
entities who wish to acquire control of a "Canadian business" (as defined in the
Investment Canada Act) to file either a notification or an application for
review with the Director of Investments appointed under the Investment Canada
Act. The Investment Canada Act requires that in certain cases an acquisition of
control of a Canadian business by a "non-Canadian" must be reviewed and approved
by the Minister responsible for the Investment Canada Act on the basis that the
Minister is satisfied that the acquisition is "likely to be of net benefit to
Canada", having regard to criteria set forth in the Investment Canada Act.
With respect to acquisitions of voting shares, only those acquisitions
of voting shares of a corporation that constitute acquisitions of control of
such corporation are reviewable under the Investment Canada Act. The Investment
Canada Act provides detailed rules for the determination of
-15-
<PAGE>
whether control has been acquired, and, pursuant to those rules, the
acquisition of one-third or more of the voting shares of a corporation may,
in some circumstances, be considered to constitute an acquisition of control.
Certain reviewable acquisitions of control may not be implemented before
being approved by the Minister. If the Minister does not ultimately approve
a reviewable acquisition which has been completed, the non-Canadian person or
entity may be required, among other things, to divest itself of control of
the acquired Canadian business. Failure to comply with the review provisions
of the Investment Canada Act could result in, among other things, a court
order directing the disposition of assets or shares.
ITEM 7. TAXATION
The following is a summary of the principal Canadian federal income
tax considerations generally applicable to a person who is a U.S. Holder. In
this summary, a "U.S. Holder" means a person who, for the purposes of the
CANADA-UNITED STATES TAX CONVENTION (1980) (the "Convention"), is a resident
of the United States and not of Canada and who, for the purposes of the
INCOME TAX ACT (Canada) (the "Canadian Tax Act"), deals at arm's length with
the Company, does not use or hold and is not deemed to use or hold the Common
Shares in carrying on business in Canada and who holds his Common Shares as
capital property. Generally, Common Shares will be considered to be capital
property to a U.S. Holder provided the U.S. Holder does not hold the Common
Shares in the course of carrying on a business and has not acquired the
Common Shares in one or more transactions considered to be an adventure in
the nature of trade. This summary is not applicable to a U.S. Holder that is
a "financial institution" for purposes of the mark-to-market rules in the
Canadian Tax Act.
The summary is based upon the Convention, the current provisions of the
Canadian Tax Act, the regulations thereunder, and proposed amendments to the
Canadian Tax Act and regulations publicly announced by or on behalf of the
Minister of Finance, Canada prior to the date hereof. It does not otherwise
take into account or anticipate any changes in law, whether by legislative,
governmental or judicial decision or action. The discussion does not take into
account the tax laws of the various provinces or territories of Canada. It is
intended to be a general description of the Canadian federal income tax
considerations and does not take into account the individual circumstances of
any particular shareholder.
U.S. Holders will be subject to a 15% withholding tax on the gross
amount of dividends paid or deemed to be paid by the Company. In the case of a
U.S. Holder that is a corporation which beneficially owns at least 10% of the
voting stock of the Company, the applicable withholding tax rate on dividends
is 5%.
-16-
<PAGE>
A purchase of Common Shares by the Company (other than by a purchase in
the open market in the manner in which shares are normally purchased by a member
of the public) will give rise to a deemed dividend equal to the amount paid by
the Company on the purchase in excess of the paid-up capital of such shares,
determined in accordance with the Canadian Tax Act. Any such deemed dividend
will be subject to non-resident withholding tax, as described above, and will
reduce the proceeds of disposition to a holder of Common Shares for the purposes
of computing the amount of his capital gain or loss arising on the disposition.
A U.S. Holder will not be subject to tax under the Canadian Tax Act in
respect of any capital gain arising on a disposition of Common Shares (including
on a purchase by the Company) unless such shares constitute taxable Canadian
property and the U.S. Holder is not entitled to relief under the Convention.
Generally, Common Shares will not constitute taxable Canadian property of a U.S.
Holder unless, at any time during the five year period immediately preceding the
disposition of the Common Shares, not less than 25% of the issued shares of any
class or series of a class of the capital stock of the Company belonged to the
U.S. Holder, to persons with whom the U.S. Holder did not deal at arm's length
or to any combination thereof. In any event, under the Convention, gains
derived by a U.S. Holder from the disposition of Common Shares will generally
not be taxable in Canada unless the value of the Company's shares is derived
principally from real property situated in Canada.
Common Shares will constitute taxable Canadian property of a U.S. Holder
that is a former Canadian resident who made an election under the Canadian Tax
Act to be deemed not to dispose of such shares on the U.S. Holder's departure
from Canada. Such U.S. Holders may not be eligible to claim the exemption
provided in the Convention for gains realized on a disposition of Common Shares
if they were resident in Canada at any time during the ten year period preceding
the disposition.
ITEM 8. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables provide a summary of certain financial information
for fiscal years 1993 through 1997. The selected financial data set forth below
as of June 30, 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993 have been derived from the
Company's audited consolidated financial statements which are prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada ("Canadian
GAAP"), which are different in some respects from generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"). See the reconciliation footnote
set forth in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing under
Item 19 hereof. The information presented should be read in conjunction with
such Consolidated Financial
-17-
<PAGE>
Statements and related Notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere
in this annual report.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA (CANADIAN GAAP)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and Other Income $150,213,517 $98,428,527 $59,421,732 $20,521,889 $17,547,983
Cost of Goods Sold 96,246,860 66,586,407 37,604,534 14,167,856 13,571,341
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
53,966,657 31,842,120 21,817,198 6,354,033 3,976,642
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses 41,999,459 25,409,225 18,269,770 9,465,086 4,597,522
Finance Charges 464,595 718,045 523,632 515,086 261,134
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
42,464,054 26,127,270 18,793,402 9,980,172 4,858,656
Income Before Taxes 11,502,603 5,714,850 3,023,796 (3,626,139) (882,014)
Income Taxes 4,142,000 504,200 -- -- --
Net Income (Loss) $7,360,603 $5,210,650 $3,023,796 ($3,626,139) ($882,014)
Net Income (Loss)
per share $0.88 $0.72 $0.48 ($0.72) ($0.18)
</TABLE>
RECONCILED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA (U.S. GAAP) (1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
---------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994
------------ ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and Other Income $150,213,517 $98,428,527 $59,421,732 $20,521,889
Cost of Goods Sold 96,333,860 65,991,946 37,083,256 13,586,786
------------ ----------- ----------- -----------
53,879,657 32,436,581 22,338,476 6,935,103
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses 42,088,959 25,579,225 18,269,770 9,325,086
Finance Charges 464,595 718,045 523,632 515,086
------------ ----------- ----------- -----------
42,553,554 26,297,270 18,793,402 9,840,172
Income Before Taxes 11,326,103 6,139,311 3,545,074 (2,905,069)
Income Taxes 4,131,800 547,200 -- --
Net Income (Loss) $7,194,303 $5,592,111 $3,545,074 ($2,905,069)
Net Income (Loss) per share $0.85 $0.75 $0.52 ($0.90)
</TABLE>
NOTE:
- -----
(1) The financial information is stated here giving the effect of a
reconciliation to U.S. GAAP from Canadian GAAP, which are the
accounting principles under which the Company's primary financial
statements are presented.
-18-
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA (CANADIAN GAAP)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total Assets $60,760,190 $42,666,839 $24,459,624 $12,026,300 $11,300,414
Total Current Assets $48,085,005 $34,858,913 $21,066,479 $9,005,628 $7,203,708
Long-term Debt $238,273 $378,710 $27,337 $57,675 $82,251
Shareholders' Equity $34,420,695 $19,959,472 $8,028,092 $3,285,875 $6,169,539
Cash Dividend per share $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
</TABLE>
RECONCILED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA (U.S. GAAP) (1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
--------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total Assets $61,700,744 $43,874,723 $24,319,445 $11,403,543
Long-term Debt $238,273 $378,710 $27,337 $57,675
Shareholders' Equity $34,908,849 $20,493,956 $8,011,111 $2,747,616
Cash Dividend per share $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
</TABLE>
NOTE:
- -----
(1) The financial information is stated here giving the effect of a
reconciliation to U. S. GAAP from Canadian GAAP, which are the
accounting principles under which the Company's primary financial
statements are presented.
-19-
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY
The following table summarizes the Company's results of operation for the 1997,
1996 and 1995 fiscal years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percentage of Sales % Change
------------------------------ ---------------------
1997 1996 1995 1997-1996 1996-1995
---- ---- ---- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and other
income 100% 100% 100% 53% 66%
Gross profit 36% 32% 37% 69% 46%
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses 28% 26% 31% 65% 39%
Finance charges 0% 1% 1% (35%) 37%
Tax provision 3% 1% 0% 721% n/a
Net income 5% 5% 5% 41% 72%
</TABLE>
Note 14 of the Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
contains a discussion of the differences between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP and
the extent to which such differences impact the Company's financial statements.
See Item 18 - Financial Statements.
FISCAL 1997 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 1996
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SALES. The Company's sales in fiscal 1997 increased 53% from the
previous year to $150.2 million. Selling prices remained relatively unchanged
from fiscal 1996 and therefore the increase in dollar sales was primarily
attributable to increased unit volume. Shipments to the United States accounted
for 97% of total revenue compared to 95% for fiscal 1996. Shipments of
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums, including accessories, accounted for 98%
of total revenue compared to 94% for the previous year.
-20-
<PAGE>
The distribution of revenue between the United States and Canada, by
retailers (including distributors) and direct-response programs, was as follows:
Revenue
(Millions of Dollars)
United States Canada Total
---------------- --------------- ----------------
1997 1996 1997 1996 1997 1996
----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----
Retailers 123.6 74.8 3.6 5.2 127.2 80.1
Direct-response 22.3 18.4 0.7 - 23.0 18.4
----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----
Total 145.9 93.2 4.3 5.2 150.2 98.4
----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----
----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----
Shipments to retailers in the United States in fiscal 1997 increased 65%
from the previous year. The increase was due to two new FANTOM-Registered
Trademark- models introduced in fiscal 1996 - the FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
FURY-Registered Trademark- and FANTOM-Registered Trademark- THUNDER-Registered
Trademark- vacuums being in the Company's line-up of products for all of fiscal
1997, as well as expanded listings, a greater number of promotional events, and
the cumulative effect of the Company's direct-response advertising. Aggregate
sales to the Company's five largest customers were $91.1 million in fiscal 1997
compared to $60.4 million in fiscal 1996.
Shipments to retailers in Canada in fiscal 1997 declined 31% from the
previous year to $3.6 million. Shipments of FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
vacuums increased to $1.1 million from $0.2 million in the previous year, but
this gain was offset by a decline in sales of stick vacuums.
Direct-response sales of FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums in fiscal
1997 increased 25% to $23.0 million, with 97% of these sales being in the United
States compared to 100% in fiscal 1996. Media spending amounted to $11.3
million in fiscal 1997 compared to $6.7 million in the previous year and
essentially all of the spending was for television time, utilizing 30-minute and
60- and 120-second formats.
COST OF GOODS SOLD. The percentage of cost of goods sold as a
function of sales was 64.1 % in fiscal 1997 compared to 67.6% for the previous
year. The decrease, despite a higher portion of sales being to retailers rather
than to end-users by direct-response television, was due to a wide range of cost
reduction activities. These activities encompassed material price reductions
from suppliers, productivity gains in assembly, and management of inventory and
improvements in overall efficiencies assisted by both the use of kanbans for
certain raw materials and the SAP enterprise-information-technology system.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and
administrative expenses, as a percentage of sales, increased to 28.0% in fiscal
1997 from 25.8% in fiscal 1996. Direct-response expenses associated with the
-21-
<PAGE>
purchase of media time and the mailing out of information kits increased to
$12.5 million from $7.3 million in fiscal 1996. Co-op advertising spending
(which is advertising controlled by the retailer which includes the supplier's
product and for which the supplier agrees to pay a portion of the costs)
increased to $5.1 million from $3.6 million to support a significant increase in
promotional events. Sales commissions increased to $1.7 million from $0.8
million. Expenses related to warranty activity and the refurbishing of returns
increased to $3.7 million from $1.4 million in the previous year. Costs
associated with insurance for receivables, bad debts and allowances for doubtful
and unreconciled accounts increased to $2.6 million from $0.9 million.
NET INCOME. The net income for fiscal 1997 was $7.4 million compared
with $5.2 million for fiscal 1996. The improvement was due mainly to the large
increase in sales and the reduction in cost of goods sold as a percentage of
sales, partially offset by the increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of sales and by tax provisions of $4.1 million compared
with only $0.5 million in fiscal 1996.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
During fiscal 1997 there was a cash generation from operations of $5.4
million. Non-cash operating working capital increased by $4.5 million due
mainly to increases in trade accounts receivable ($6.9 million), other
receivables ($1.8 million) and inventory ($1.1 million) net of a decrease in
prepaid expenses ($0.9 million), increases in payables and accruals ($2.3
million) and an increase in income taxes payable ($2.1 million). Items not
requiring cash included depreciation of $1.0 million and a deferred tax
provision of $1.5 million.
Cash in the amount of $6.9 million was provided from equity infusions.
On June 27, 1997 the Company completed a private placement of 500,000 Class A
Special Warrants at $14.00 per special warrant for gross proceeds of $7.0
million. Costs of the Class A Special Warrant offering, including underwriters'
fees, are anticipated to amount to $0.5 million. An additional $0.4 million of
equity was provided from the exercise of stock options and broker compensation
warrants.
During fiscal 1997, the Company invested $5.9 million in capital
expenditures. These expenditures were mainly for tooling and assembly equipment
to support the increased demand for the Company's existing FANTOM-Registered
Trademark- vacuums; to modernize assembly operations at the Company's Welland,
Ontario plant; for tooling for the Company's new FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
LIGHTNING-Registered Trademark- canister vacuum scheduled for launch in Fall
1997; and for software and hardware to support advances in information
technology.
-22-
<PAGE>
The Company's net cash position as at June 30, 1997 was $4.7 million
compared with a net loan payable of $1.6 million at June 30, 1996. Key ratio's
improved from the previous year as follows:
As of June 30 1997 1996
------------- ---- ----
Current Assets to Current Liabilities 1.95 1.57
Total Liabilities to Tangible Net Worth 0.77 1.14
Effective September 30, 1996 the Company arranged a new credit
facility with a Canadian chartered bank which currently allows the Company to
borrow up to a maximum of $13.0 million for general operating requirements
and a further $4.0 million for capital expenditures. Interest on the
operating line is at the prime rate of the Canadian chartered bank; interest
on the capital line is at prime plus 1/2%. There are no service or
administrative fees. The availability on the operating loan is subject to a
formula based upon trade-receivable and inventory levels. Both loans are
secured by a general assignment of book debts, a general security agreement
and a mortgage over the Company's assets. The facility was fully available
but unused as at June 30, 1997. Prior to the current agreement becoming
effective, the Company had a financing agreement with Commcorp Financial
Services Inc. of Burlington, Ontario. The interest rate payable was the
prime rate of a Canadian chartered bank plus 2%. During the term of the
agreement there was also a service and administration fee payable, calculated
as a percentage of sales. This fee for the period the agreement was in
effect during fiscal 1997 was $0.3 million compared to $0.9 million for all
of fiscal 1996.
FISCAL 1996 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 1995
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SALES. The Company's sales in fiscal 1996 increased 66% from the
previous year. Because no material price changes were implemented in 1996 the
increase in revenue was primarily attributable to unit volume increases. Sales
to the United States accounted for 95% of total revenue compared to 89% for the
previous year. Shipments of FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums accounted for
94% of revenue compared with 87% for fiscal 1995.
In January 1996 the Company launched a new FANTOM-Registered
Trademark-vacuum called the FANTOM-Registered Trademark- FURY-Registered
Trademark-, a lighter version of the original FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
vacuum. To support the launch, the Company produced a new 30-minute TV
infomercial and two short-form TV spots (60 and 120 seconds) which commenced
airing in February and March, 1996 respectively. Also in March, the Company
began shipping to the U.S. market a more powerful version of the original
FANTOM-Registered Trademark-vacuum called the FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
THUNDER-Registered Trademark-vacuum.
-23-
<PAGE>
The Company produced two short-form TV spots (60 and 120 seconds) for this
product and they commenced airing in June 1996.
Sales to retailers in fiscal 1996 increased 115% from the previous year
to $80.1 million. Aggregate sales to two major United States retailers were
$44.0 million compared with $18.8 million for the previous year. The increase
resulted from the introduction of the two new FANTOM-Registered Trademark-
models, from expanded listings and promotional activity, and from the cumulative
effect of the Company's direct response television advertising.
Direct-response sales were $18.4 million compared with $22.1 million for
the previous year. Media spending was $6.7 million compared with $7.5 million
for fiscal 1995. The decline in advertising was due in part to escalating media
rates and less availability of attractive 30-minute time periods.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and
administrative expenses in fiscal 1996 increased 39% from the previous year but
as a percentage of sales declined from 30.7% to 25.8%. Co-op advertising
spending (which is advertising controlled by the retailer which includes the
supplier's product and for which the supplier agrees to pay a portion of the
costs) with U.S. retailers increased from $0.7 million to $3.2 million to
support the large increase in sales. Direct-response TV expenses totalled $10.9
million and included $6.7 million for media and $2.1 million for back-end costs
associated with in-bound telemarketing, credit card fees, fulfillment and
delivery. These compare with media spending and back-end costs of $7.5 million
and $2.2 million respectively for fiscal 1995.
COST OF GOODS SOLD. Cost of goods sold for the year ended June 30,
1996, as a percentage of sales, increased to 67.6% from 63.3% in the previous
year. This percentage increase was due mainly to a greater portion of sales
being to retailers rather than to end-users via direct-response television.
NET INCOME. The net income for fiscal 1996 was $5.2 million compared
with $3.0 million for 1995. The improvement was due mainly to the large
increase in sales and the decrease in selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of sales. The net income achievement for fiscal 1996
includes tax provisions of $0.5 million compared with nil for 1995.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
During the year ended June 30, 1996 there was a cash generation from
operations of $1.3 million. Non-cash operating working capital increased by
$5.0 million due to increases in accounts receivable and inventory net of
increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and this
-24-
<PAGE>
was primarily due to the large increase in sales. Cash in the amount of $6.7
million was provided from equity infusions. On December 6, 1995 Fair Global
International Ltd. of Hong Kong exercised warrants to purchase 100,000 Common
Shares of the Company at a price of $2.50 per Common Share. On December 20,
1995 the Company received gross proceeds of $6.0 million (of which $3.0
million went into escrow) on the issue of 1,000,000 special warrants. The
escrowed funds were released on March 29, 1996. Costs of the special warrant
offering, net of estimated corporate income tax recoveries of $0.2 million,
were $0.3 million. On February 5, 1996 B & H Electronics (HK) Ltd. of Hong
Kong exercised warrants to purchase 200,000 Common Shares of the Company at a
price of $2.50 per Common Share. On April 30, 1996 Newcrest Capital Inc.
exercised compensation warrants to purchase 24,000 Common Shares of the
Company at a price of $6.125 per Common Share. On May 6, 1996 Sprott
Securities Limited exercised compensation warrants to purchase 2,400 Common
Shares of the Company at a price of $6.125 per Common Share. An additional
$0.1 million of equity was provided from the exercise of outside director and
employee stock options.
During fiscal 1996, the Company invested $5.3 million in capital
expenditures. These expenditures were mainly for tooling and assembly equipment
for the Company's FANTOM-Registered Trademark- FURY-Registered Trademark- vacuum
cleaner, to modernize assembly operations at the Company's Welland plant and to
install new information technology.
The Company's net loan payable (loan payable less cash) as at June 30,
1996 was $1.6 million compared with $4.3 million at June 30, 1995. Key ratio's
improved from the previous year as follows:
As of June 30 1996 1995
------------- ---- ----
Total Liabilities to Tangible Net Worth 1.14 2.18
Current Assets to Current Liabilities 1.57 1.28
Finance charges during fiscal 1996 increased to $0.7 million from $0.5
million in fiscal 1995. This resulted from the increased loan required to
support the higher level of working capital. Service and administration fees
paid to Commcorp Financial Services Inc. increased to $0.9 million from $0.7
million.
IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
The Company has not experienced any net inflationary cost increases
during the past three fiscal years. The Company has enjoyed a period of overall
product cost reductions from fiscal 1995 to 1997 due primarily to the additional
purchasing leverage associated with the Company's volume growth. Several
individual cost components have
-25-
<PAGE>
increased thereby reducing the amount of the overall cost reduction, notably
corrugated carton costs and the cost of the Company's labour agreements,
however the overall impact on product costs for these items has been less
than 2% of product costs.
The cost of media time for the Company's infomercial has increased from
fiscal 1995 to fiscal 1997 as the use of infomercals and the associated demand
for air time has increased. Due to the various markets and seasonality
associated with media time it is difficult to quantify the impact of this
increased cost on the Company's net income.
The Company's selling price structure has not changed significantly in
the fiscal years from 1995 to 1997. Substantially all of the sales growth has
been a function of unit volume increases.
OUTLOOK
The Company believes that its FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuum line
is continuing to grow in popularity in the United States, and is beginning to
grow in Canada as a result of the Company's advertising campaigns, broadened
exposure among retailers and word-of-mouth endorsements by satisfied customers.
The Company intends to focus on increasing its sales of
FANTOM-Registered Trademark- vacuums in the United States and Canada by:
(a) continuing to focus on expanding distribution and promotional activity
for its existing models with retailers;
(b) continuing to employ direct-response television, and to explore other
direct-response formats, not only to generate direct sales but also to
build broad-scale consumer awareness and demand for FANTOM-Registered
Trademark- products at the retail level; and
(c) developing and introducing new vacuum-cleaning products utilizing the
Company's proprietary, dual-cyclonic technology.
The Company has various agreements with the licensor of its
dual-cyclonic technology which provide the Company with the exclusive right
(except for a special-purpose license to a direct-marketing company) to sell
upright vacuum-cleaning devices utilizing the dual-cyclonic technology in the
United States and Canada, the exclusive right to sell canister and backpack
products utilizing the technology in the United States and Canada, and the
non-exclusive right to sell upright dry-powder carpet shampooers utilizing
the technology in the United States and Canada. The first of the basic
patents in the U.S. for the dual-cyclonic technology does not expire until
June 2003.
-26-
<PAGE>
The Company plans to introduce the FANTOM-Registered
Trademark-LIGHTNING-Registered Trademark- canister vacuum in Fall 1997. Due
to the uncertainties associated with a new product launch, it is not possible
to forecast sales of this product, or its effect or net income, with any
reasonable degree of accuracy. Up-front spending for design and development,
tooling, assembly equipment and the production of a new 30-minute TV
infomercial and short-form (60- and 120-second) TV spots is expected to
amount to approximately $5.0 million. Of this amount, $2.1 million was
incurred in fiscal 1997. The Company plans to manufacture the
FANTOM-Registered Trademark-LIGHTNING-Registered Trademark- product in its
Welland, Ontario facility.
The Company is pursuing the development of other new product concepts
for vacuum cleaners based on its proprietary, dual-cyclonic technology; however,
it is not possible at this early stage of the development process to forecast
sales, impact on net income or capital requirements associated with these
concepts. The Company is also exploring the possibility of acquiring other
product lines, or technology which could lead to new products, which fit with
its core competencies. The Company is not able at this time to estimate the
costs or impact on its business of making such an acquisition.
Given that the Company's sales occur mainly in the United States, but
manufacturing takes place in Canada, the Company's results are sensitive to
changes in the exchange rate between the Canadian and U.S. dollar. To help
offset the effect of adverse currency fluctuation, the Company maintains a
hedging program consisting mainly of the purchase of forward contracts to sell
U.S. dollars. As of June 30, 1997 the Company held forward contracts to sell
$37.5 million U.S. dollars, expiring at various dates through December, 1997 at
an average price of $1.3679 Cdn. A protracted rise in the relative value of the
Canadian dollar would have a negative effect on net income for the Company.
Based on the Company's fiscal 1997 results, a rise in value of the Canadian
dollar of 1 cent, without the protection of hedging, would adversely affect net
income by approximately $0.7 million.
The electric floor-care industry is highly competitive and includes,
among others, the following major competitors: Bissell Inc.; Eureka Company; The
Hoover Company; Matsushita Appliance Corporation; and Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
Some of these competitors have recently introduced new products which are
competing at similar price points with the Company's Fantom-Registered
Trademark- Fury-Registered Trademark- and Fantom-Registered Trademark-
Thunder-Registered Trademark- vacuums. One such competitive product, the
introduction of which appears to have been heavily supported by media
advertising, is based on bag technology. Another new competitive product
incorporates a form of cyclonic filtering system. The Company is uncertain what
effect these new competitive products, or future ones which could be introduced,
will have on its sales and results of operations.
-27-
<PAGE>
The Company believes it is positioned to realize further cost savings in
manufacturing as a result of programs initiated in fiscal 1997 and new programs
anticipated to be initiated in fiscal 1998. The savings are expected to occur
mainly from material price reductions from suppliers, productivity gains in
assembly, and efficiencies associated with increased levels of output.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF COMPANY
Executive
Name and Municipality Position(s) with the Officer Director
of Residence Company Since(1)(2) Since(1)(2)
- ----------------------- -------------------- ----------- -----------
Arthur H. Crockett Director -- 1984
Toronto, Ontario (3)
Maxwell Goldhar Director -- 1989
Toronto, Ontario (3)
Kenneth Kelman Director and Chairman 1989 1984
Toronto, Ontario of the Board
Rikki Meggeson Director -- 1989
North York, Ontario(4)
Allan D. Millman Director, 1984 1984
Toronto, Ontario President and
Chief Executive
Officer
C. George Scala Director -- 1992
Beverly,
Massachusetts(3)
Alan Steinert, Jr. Director -- 1990
Cambridge,
Massachusetts (3)
Stephen J. Doorey Vice-President, 1997 --
Mississauga, Ontario Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
Alan C. Hussey Vice President, 1995 --
Welland, Ontario Manufacturing
Walter J. Palmer Secretary 1996 --
Toronto, Ontario
Joseph A. Shillington Vice President, 1996 --
Welland, Ontario Information
Systems
Paul F. Smith Vice President, 1997
Oakville, Ontario Sales
Norman V. Soler Vice President, 1984 --
Port Colborne, Ontario Engineering
Nick E. Varanakis Vice President, 1989 --
Sandy,Utah Sales - United
States
Linda L. Watson Vice President, 1995 --
Mississauga, Ontario Marketing
Norman Wotherspoon Treasurer 1997 --
St.Catharines, Ontario
-28-
<PAGE>
NOTES:
- ------
(1) All directors are elected and serve until the next annual meeting of
shareholders or until their successors are elected or appointed. All
executive officers of the Company serve at the pleasure of the Company's
board of directors.
(2) Each director/officer has served as a director/officer of the Company and
its predecessor continuously since the year set out opposite his/her name.
(3) Member of the Audit Committee.
(4) Daughter of Kenneth Kelman.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The mandate of the Board of Directors is to oversee the conduct of the
Company's business. The Board has approved guidelines on corporate governance
issues which set out the manner in which it will discharge its responsibilities
in this regard, in some cases with the assistance of committees of the Board
whose duties are described below.
The Board is responsible for the overall strategic direction of the
Company, and approves major new product development programmes and debt and
equity financing.
The objective of the Board of Directors is to maximize shareholder value
in a manner which is consistent with good corporate citizenship, including fair
treatment of the Company's employees, customers and suppliers. The Board
expects management to perform in a manner consistent with achieving these
objectives.
The majority of the Company's directors are unrelated to the Company, in
that they are independent of management and are free from any interest, business
or other relationship (other than any arising from shareholding) which could, or
could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with their ability to act
with a view to the best interests of the Company.
BOARD COMMITTEES
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The mandate of the Audit Committee is to review the Company's audited
annual financial statements and to report on such statements to the Board before
the statements are approved by the Board. To fulfill this responsibility, the
Committee meets with the Company's auditors to discuss the financial statements
and any concerns raised by the auditors with respect to financial presentation
or disclosure, and with respect to the Company's
-29-
<PAGE>
internal financial controls. The Audit Committee also recommends to the Board
the auditors to be appointed as the Company's auditors at the annual meeting.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee reviews the Company's overall compensation
philosophy, and corporate succession and development plans at the executive
officer level. This Committee has been mandated to recommend to the Board the
corporate objectives which the chief executive officer is responsible for
meeting, to review the annual performance of the chief executive officer in
light of these objectives, and to make recommendations to the Board with respect
to the chief executive officer's remuneration.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE
The Environmental Committee reviews the Company's policies and
procedures relating to environmental matters, to determine whether they are
adequate to ensure compliance with all relevant laws. This Committee receives
reports from management with respect to compliance issues.
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for
developing the Company's approach to governance issues, including recommending
to the Board limits to management's responsibilities.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee's mandate also
includes making recommendations with respect to the size and composition of the
Board; recommending nominees to the Board and the amount and form of directors'
remuneration; assisting in selecting a chair of the Board; and developing and
implementing an orientation and education program for new recruits to the Board.
In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has been
mandated to develop a process for assessing the effectiveness of the Board as a
whole and of committees of the Board, and for assessing the contribution of
individual directors.
If an individual director wishes to engage an outside adviser at the
expense of the Company, in relation to a matter involving the Company, such
engagement must be approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee.
-30-
<PAGE>
ITEM 11. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The aggregate amount of compensation paid by the Company and its
subsidiaries during the Company's 1997 fiscal year to all directors and
officers as a group for services in all capacities was approximately
$1,635,000. The aggregate amount set aside or accrued by the Company and its
subsidiaries during the last fiscal year of the Company to provide pension,
retirement or similar benefits for directors or officers, pursuant to any
existing plan provided or contributed to by the Company or its subsidiaries
was approximately $52,000.
The following table sets forth all annual and long-term compensation
for services in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (to the extent required to be
disclosed by the regulation made under the Securities Act (Ontario)) in
respect of each individual who was, at June 30, 1997, (a) the chief executive
officer or (b) an executive officer who received compensation greater than
$100,000 per annum (collectively with the chief executive officer, the "Named
Executive Officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table provides a summary of the compensation earned
during the last three fiscal years for each of the Named Executive Officers.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual Compensation Long-Term Compensation
------------------- -------------------------------
Awards Payouts
--------------------- -------
Securities Restricted
Other Under Shares or All
Annual Options/ Restricted Other
Compen- SARs Share LTIP Compen-
Name and Principal Salary Bonus sation Granted Units Payouts sation
Position(1) Year ($) ($) ($) (#) ($) ) ($) ($)
-------- ---- ------- ------ --------- -------- ---------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allan D. Millman 1997 235,000 88,125 40,000 12,925
PRESIDENT AND 1996 195,000 68,250
CHIEF EXECUTIVE 1995 144,193 50,000
OFFICER
Nick E. Varanakis 1997 138,889 54,495 20,000 7,735
VICE PRESIDENT, 1996 115,864 40,754
SALES (2) 1995 116,131 43,288
Alan C. Hussey 1997 118,334 45,000 30,000 6,533
VICE PRESIDENT, 1996 108,336 38,500
MANUFACTURING (3) 1995 33,332
</TABLE>
-31-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual Compensation Long-Term Compensation
---------------------------- -------------------------------
Awards Payouts
-------------------- -------
Securities Restricted
Other Under Shares or All
Annual Options/ Restricted Other
Compen- SARs Share LTIP Compen-
Name and Principal Salary Bonus sation Granted Units Payouts sation
Position(1) Year ($) ($) ($) (#) ($) ) ($) ($)
-------- ---- ------- ------ ------ ------- -------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Norman V. Soler 1997 118,334 45,000 20,000
VICE PRESIDENT, 1996 110,000 38,500
ENGINEERING 1995 104,778 42,000
Linda L. Watson 1997 118,334 45,000 30,000 6,533
VICE PRESIDENT, 1996 102,631 38,500
MARKETING (4) 1995 7,692
</TABLE>
NOTES:
- ------
(1) Positions indicated are those as at June 30, 1997.
(2) The salary of this Named Executive Officer is expressed and paid in U.S.
dollars. For purposes of the table, his salary was converted to Canadian
dollars using the simple average of the closing exchange rate on the last
day of each month during the relevant fiscal year.
(3) This Named Executive Officer was employed with the Company for only 4
months during the 1995 fiscal year.
(4) This Named Executive Officer was employed with the Company for only 1 month
during the 1995 fiscal year.
PENSION PLAN TABLE
Historically, the Company's Salaried Employees' Pension Plan (the
"Pension Plan") was solely a defined benefit plan. Effective January 1,
1997, members of the Pension Plan were given the option to transfer the
commuted value of their accrued benefits to a newly-created defined
contribution portion of the Pension Plan and thereafter to participate in the
defined contribution portion of the Pension Plan.
The following table sets out the annual amount which would be payable
from the defined benefit portion of the Pension Plan based on retirement at
age 65, at various levels of remuneration and years of credited service to
employees who did not elect to transfer to the defined contribution portion
of the Pension Plan.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Remuneration Years of Service
- ------------ ----------------
($) 5 10 15 20 25 30
------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
100,000 7,070 14,140 21,210 28,281 35,351 42,421
125,000 8,611 17,222 25,833 34,444 43,056 51,667
150,000 8,611 17,222 25,833 34,444 43,056 51,667
175,000 8,611 17,222 25,833 34,444 43,056 51,667
200,000 8,611 17,222 25,833 34,444 43,056 51,667
225,000 8,611 17,222 25,833 34,444 43,056 51,667
250,000 8,611 17,222 25,833 34,444 43,056 51,667
</TABLE>
-32-
<PAGE>
NOTES:
- ------
(1) The remuneration used to calculate defined benefits (for the defined
benefit portion of the Pension Plan) for Named Executive Officers is their
salary and includes sales incentives, commissions, bonuses, overtime pay,
vacation pay and holiday pay.
(2) The credited years of service for Norman V. Soler, who is the only Named
Executive Officer continuing to participate in the defined benefit portion
of the Pension Plan, was 21.5 years as at June 30, 1997. The remaining
Named Executive Officers participate in the defined contribution portion of
the Pension Plan.
(3) Pensions paid under the Pension Plan are payable for the member's lifetime
with the guarantee that the pension will be paid for at least five years.
Company pensions are augmented by government pension benefits after age 65.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES DURING THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
The following table sets out, for each of the Named Executive Officers,
any options exercised during the year ended June 30, 1997 and the current value
of any unexercised options at June 30, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unexercised Value of Unexercised
Common Shares Options at in the money Options
------------- June 30, 1997 at June 30, 1997
Acquired on Aggregate (#) ($)
Exercise Value Realized Exercisable/ Exercisable/
Name (#) $ Unexercisable Unexercisable
- ---- ----------- -------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allan D. Millman Nil Nil Nil/40,000 Nil/124,000
Nick E. Varanakis Nil Nil Nil/20,000 Nil/77,000
Alan C. Hussey Nil Nil 10,000/20,000 107,500/77,000
Norman V. Soler Nil Nil Nil/20,000 Nil/77,000
Linda L. Watson Nil Nil 10,000/20,000 107,500/77,000
</TABLE>
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS
The Company has entered into agreements with its Named Executive
Officers pursuant to which the Company has agreed that in the event the
employment of any of such officers is terminated following a change of control
of the Company, the terminated officer will be entitled to receive a lump sum
retiring allowance varying from one and one-half to two and one-half times the
annual salary of the terminated officer and will also be entitled to
continuation of normal employee benefits for an equivalent period.
-33-
<PAGE>
COMPOSITION OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997, the Compensation Committee
of the Board consisted of Messrs. C. George Scala, Arthur H. Crockett, Maxwell
Goldhar and Alan Steinert, Jr.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee is mandated to ensure that the Company's
compensation policies are adequate to attract and retain highly qualified and
experienced executives.
The Company's compensation policy for Named Executive Officers,
including the chief executive officer, primarily emphasizes annual cash
compensation. The Compensation Committee obtains survey data on executive
compensation from independent professional compensation consultants which it
reviews with a view to assessing the Company's salary ranges and to determining
its policies on executive compensation. At present, the target level for
executive salaries is the 75% quartile level of companies of comparable size
(Canadian companies for Company executives based in Canada and United States
companies for the Company executive based in the U.S.).
The Company has an Executive Gain Sharing Plan which relates a portion
of the total executive compensation to the Company's overall performance. Under
this plan, each of the Named Executive Officers was entitled during the 1997
fiscal year to receive a bonus based on the amount by which the Company's actual
pre-tax income exceeded a pre-established target level.
During the Company's 1997 fiscal year, the Company granted options to
purchase Common Shares pursuant to the Key Employees' Stock Option Plan of the
Company (the "Employee Plan") to each of the Named Executive Officers. These
options vest over a two year period from the date of grant and are exercisable
at an option price which was equal to the fair market value of the Common Shares
on the date of the grant of the options. These options provide the medium-term
incentive component of the Named Executive Officers' remuneration. The amount
of options already outstanding under the Employee Plan was taken into account at
the time of each option grant.
Presented by the Committee:
C. George Scala
Arthur H. Crockett
Maxwell Goldhar
Alan Steinert, Jr.
-34-
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The Company does not pay any compensation to any of its Named Executive
Officers who is a director for his services as a director. The Company pays each
of its remaining directors who is not an employee of the Company a fixed sum of
U.S. $10,000 per annum for his or her services as a director (except for the
chairman of the board who is paid a fixed sum of U.S. $25,000 for his services
in that capacity), U.S. $1,000 for each directors' meeting attended and U.S.
$600 for each committee meeting attended (except for the chairman of each
committee meeting who receives U.S. $1,000 per meeting).
On January 9, 1997, each of the non-employee directors was granted an
option to purchase 20,000 Common Shares at an exercise price of $9.30 per share,
pursuant to the Company's Outside Director Share Option Plan. Each of these
options vest as to 10,000 Common Shares on the first anniversary of their grant
and as to the balance on the second anniversary of their grant.
SHARE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the total cumulative shareholder return
over the last five years for $100 invested in Common Shares of the Company at
June 30, 1992 with that of the total cumulative return of the TSE 300 Stock
Index. As the Company has not paid dividends during this five-year period, the
shareholders return for the Company does not assume reinvestment of dividends.
-35-
<PAGE>
[GRAPH]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
TSE 300 INDEX $117 $118 $132 $146 $ 187
FANTOM $ 95 $235 $415 $900 $1465
</TABLE>
DIRECTORS' AND OFFICERS' LIABILITY INSURANCE
Under the existing policy of insurance, the Company is entitled to be
reimbursed for indemnity payments it is required or permitted to make to
directors and officers which are in excess of $25,000 deductible per occurrence,
to a maximum of $40,000,000 in each policy year. The directors and officers of
the Company are insured for losses arising from claims against them for certain
of their acts, errors or omissions for which the Company does not indemnify
them, to a maximum of $40,000,000 in each policy year. As at the date hereof
all of the directors and officers of the Company and its subsidiaries are
included as insureds under the policy. All premiums for the policy are paid by
the Company. The annual premium paid for directors and officers liability
insurance was $62,695 for fiscal 1997. The premiums for the insurance are not
allocated between directors and officers as separate groups.
-36-
<PAGE>
ITEM 12. OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SECURITIES FROM COMPANY OR SUBSIDIARIES
The following table describes options to acquire Common Shares of the
Company outstanding as of October 15, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER EXERCISE
UNDER PRICE EXPIRY
RECIPIENT OPTION PER SHARE DATE
--------- ------ --------- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outside Directors 40,000 $5.00 October 30, 1998
Outside Directors 120,000 $9.30 January 8, 2000
-------
TOTAL FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS 160,000
-------
-------
Officers 20,000 $3.90 April 12, 2000
Officers 10,000 $8.50 April 10, 2001
Officers 50,000 $9.30 January 8, 2002
Officers 110,000 $12.30 April 16, 2002
Employees 20,000 $12.30 April 16, 2002
-------
TOTAL FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 210,000
-------
-------
Independent Consultant 30,000 $7.00 December 19, 2000
Independent Consultant 10,000 $7.75 January 8, 2001
Independent Consultant 20,000 $12.30 April 16, 2002
-------
TOTAL FOR INDEPENDENT CONSULTANTS 60,000
-------
-------
</TABLE>
STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company has three existing stock option plans, two for employees and
one for non-employee directors. The original plan for employees (the "Prior
Plan") was implemented in 1986 and 130,000 Common Shares have been reserved for
issuance thereunder to full-time employees of the Company. As of October 15,
1997, a total of 119,250 Common Shares had been acquired pursuant to options
granted under the Prior Plan and no options remained outstanding. The Company
has stated that no further options will be granted under the Prior Plan.
As a result of the implementation by The Toronto Stock Exchange of new
rules relating to stock option plans, the Company created a new key employee
stock option plan (the "Current Plan") on October 20, 1994. An aggregate of
400,000 Common Shares has been reserved for issuance pursuant to the Current
Plan. As of October 15, 1997, options had been granted with respect to 250,000
Common Shares and options remained outstanding in respect of an aggregate of
210,000 Common Shares.
-37-
<PAGE>
Under the Current Plan, the Company's Board of Directors may grant to
full-time employees of the Company or its subsidiaries options to purchase such
number of Common Shares as the Board in its discretion considers appropriate.
The exercise price for the Common Shares covered by each option is determined by
the Board of Directors, but must not be less than the fair market value of the
Common Shares at the time of the grant of the option. Options granted under the
Current Plan cannot have a term exceeding five years. Such options become
exercisable as to 50% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and as to
the balance on the second anniversary of the date of the grant. Options granted
under the Current Plan are non-assignable and expire on the earlier of (a) the
last day of their original term and (b) the earliest of (i) the first
anniversary of the optionee's retirement, (ii) 180 days after the optionee's
death and (iii) 90 days after any other termination of the employee's employment
with the Company.
The Company also has a stock option plan (the "Outside Director Plan")
which it introduced in September 1993 pursuant to which an aggregate of 340,000
Common Shares have been reserved for issuance to directors who are not full-time
employees of the Company. The Outside Director Plan entitles each of the
Company's outside directors upon his or her initial election to the Board, to an
option to purchase 20,000 Common Shares (or such lesser number as is available
for options under the Outside Director Plan at the time a new director first
becomes a director) and additional options may be granted to outside directors
under the Outside Director Plan. The option price is determined by the Board of
Directors and must not be less than the greater of $1.10 per Common Share and
the fair market value of the Common Shares on the date of grant. Options
granted under the Outside Director Plan are fully vested no later than the
second anniversary following the date of grant and must be exercised within
three years from the date of grant. At October 15, 1997, options in respect of
an aggregate of 300,000 Common Shares have been granted under the Outside
Director Plan, of which options in respect of 140,000 Common Shares have been
exercised.
The Company has also reserved 60,000 Common Shares pursuant to
outstanding options granted to independent consultants.
The Board of Directors of the Company is entitled to amend both the
Current Plan and the Outside Director Plan subject to the approval of The
Toronto Stock Exchange, which approval would require shareholder approval in
certain circumstances.
The Company does not provide financial assistance to optionees to
facilitate the purchase of Common Shares under any of its stock option plans.
-38-
<PAGE>
ITEM 13. INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT IN CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
Not Applicable
PART II
ITEM 14. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED.
Not Applicable
PART III
ITEM 15. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 16. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND CHANGES IN SECURITY FOR REGISTERED SECURITIES
None
PART IV
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Not Applicable
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared on the basis
of Canadian GAAP. A reconciliation to U.S. GAAP appears in Note 14 thereto.
-39-
<PAGE>
ITEM 19. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
(a) The following financial statements, financial statement schedules and
related materials are filed as part of this annual report:
Page No.
--------
(1) Auditors' Report to the Directors 47
(2) Consolidated Balance Sheets as at June 30, 1997 and 1996
(audited) 48
(3) Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (audited) 49
(4) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Financial Position for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (audited) 50
(5) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 51
(6) Auditors' Report as to Financial Statement Schedule 70
(7) Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 71
(b) The following exhibits are filed as part of this annual report:
(1) Articles of incorporation and by-laws.
*(1.1) The Company's Articles of Incorporation (Amalgamation),
including all amendments thereto
*(1.2) The Company's By-Laws, including all amendments thereto
(2) Instruments defining the rights of holders of registered equity
securities.
*(2.1) Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan
**(2.2) Outside Director Share Option Plan
*(2.3) Key Employees' Stock Option Plan
*(2.4) Warrant for Purchase of Common Shares dated October 3,
1994 issued to B & H Electronics (HK) Ltd.
-40-
- ---------------------------------
* Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F/A dated November 11, 1995.
<PAGE>
*(2.5) Warrant for Purchase of Common Shares dated October 3,
1994 issued to Fair Global International Ltd.
*(2.6) Subscription Agreement dated September 8, 1994 between the
Company and B & H Electronics (HK) Ltd.
*(2.7) Amending Agreement dated September 22, 1994 between the
Company and B & H Electronics (HK) Ltd.
(2.8) Class A Special Warrant Indenture dated as of June 27,
1997 between the Company and The R-M Trust Company
(2.9) Underwriting Agreement dated June 27, 1997 between the
Company, International Network Fund Limited Partnership,
Newcrest Capital Inc. and Sprott Securities Inc.
(2.10) Underwriting Agreement dated September 30, 1997 between
the Company, International Network Fund Limited
Partnership, Newcrest Capital Inc. and Sprott Securities
Inc.
(3) Contracts not made in the ordinary course of business.
*(3.1) Technology Transfer Agreement***
*(3.2) Technology Transfer Agreement***
*(3.3) U.S. Technology Transfer Agreement***
*(3.4) Umbrella Agreement***
**(3.5) Agreement dated September 13, 1996 between Prototypes
Limited, Notetry Limited and the Company***
*(3.6) General Security Agreement dated October 8, 1993 between
the Company and IMF
*(3.7) Assignment made October 18, 1993 between Royal Bank of
Canada, IMF and the Company with respect to General
Security Agreement dated May 30, 1986 and Charge/Mortgage
of Land (Debenture) dated July 16, 1990
*(3.8) General Security Agreement dated May 30, 1986 between the
Company and Royal Bank of Canada
-41-
- -------------------
* Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F/A dated November 11, 1995.
** Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F dated November 14, 1996.
*** Filed pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under which the Company has requested
Confidential Treatment of certain portions of this exhibit.
<PAGE>
*(3.9) Assignment of Mortgage registered October 21, 1993 as
instrument no. 660959 by Royal Bank to IMF acknowledged
by the Company
*(3.10) Memorandum of Agreement of Sales, Assignment and Transfer
of Book Debts, Accounts, etc. (Quebec) dated October 21,
1993 between the Company and IMF
*(3.11) Moveable Hypothec dated December 15, 1994 granted by the
Company in favour of IMF
*(3.12) General Security Agreement (United States) dated
December 8, 1993 between Fantom Technologies Direct, Inc.
and IMF
*(3.13) Guarantee Agreement made October 15, 1993 between the
Company, International Network Fund Limited Partnership,
RKK Holdings Inc. and Allan D. Millman
*(3.14) General Security Agreement dated October 15, 1993 between
the Company and International Network Fund Limited
Partnership, RKK Holdings Inc. and Allan D. Millman
*(3.15) Charge/Mortgage of Land registered October 21, 1993 as
instrument no. 660956 between the Company and
International Network Fund Limited Partnership, RKK
Holdings Inc. and Allan D. Millman
*(3.16) Amendment to Guarantee Agreement made February 28, 1994
between the Company, International Network Fund Limited
Partnership, RKK Holdings Inc. and Allan D. Millman
*(3.17) Mortgage Amending Agreement registered March 23, 1994 as
instrument no 668362 with respect to Charge/Mortgage of
Land registered October 21, 1993
*(3.18) Loan and Receivables Service Agreement made as of
September 30, 1993 between the Company and IMF
-42-
- ---------------------
* Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F/A dated November 11, 1995.
<PAGE>
*(3.19) Amending Agreement: Loan and Receivables Service
Agreement dated as of January 17, 1994 between IMF and
the Company
*(3.20) Amending Agreement: Loan and Receivables Service
Agreement May 9, 1994 between IMF and the Company
*(3.21) Third Amending Agreement: Loan and Receivables Service
Agreement dated August 31, 1994 between IMF and the
Company
*(3.22) Assumption Agreement: Loan and Receivables Service
Agreement dated November 8, 1993 between IMF and Fantom
Technologies Direct, Inc. and acknowledged by the Company
*(3.23) Fourth Amending Agreement: Loan and Receivables
Servicing Agreement dated August 4, 1995 among IMF, the
Company and Fantom Technologies Direct, Inc.
*(3.24) Moveable Hypothec dated September 22, 1995 granted by the
Company in favour of IMF
*(3.25) Letter Agreement dated August 29, 1994 between the
Company and B & H Electronics (HK) Ltd.
*(3.26) General Security Agreement dated September 9, 1994
between the Company and B & H Electronics (HK) Ltd.
**(3.27) Release of Security dated September 30, 1996 by IMF
*(3.28) Agreement dated April 14, 1988 between the Company and
Allan D. Millman
*(3.29) Agreement dated April 14, 1988 between the Company and
William G. Birdsall
**(3.30) Letter Agreement dated August 12, 1996 between the
Company and William G. Birdsall
*(3.31) Agreement dated April 14, 1988 between the Company and
Dominic M. Lapenna
-43-
- --------------------
* Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F/A dated November 11, 1995.
** Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F dated November 14, 1996.
<PAGE>
*(3.32) Agreement dated September 10, 1992 between the Company
and Nick E. Varanakis
*(3.33) Agreement dated April 14, 1988 between the Company and
Norman V. Soler
**(3.34) Commitment Letter from a Canadian chartered bank (the
"Bank") to the Company dated May 22, 1996
**(3.35) General Security Agreement dated September 27, 1996 made
by Company in favour of the Bank
**(3.36) General Assignment of Book Debts, etc., dated
September 27, 1996 made by the Company in favour of the
Bank
**(3.37) Form 2 Charge/Mortgage of Land issued by the Company to
the Bank with regard to the real property municipally
known as 1110 Hansler Road, Welland, Ontario
**(3.38) Notice of Intention to give Security under Section 427 of
the BANK ACT (Canada) dated September 27, 1996 made by
the Company in favour of the Bank
**(3.39) Agreement as to loans and advances and security therefor
under Section 427 of the BANK ACT (Canada) dated
September 27, 1996 made by the Company in favour of the
Bank
**(3.40) Agreement re: operating credit line dated September 27,
1996 between the Bank and the Company
**(3.41) Acceptance Agreement dated September 27, 1996 made by the
Company in favour of the Bank
**(3.42) Guarantee dated September 27, 1996 made by Fantom
Technologies Direct, Inc. ("Fantom Direct") in favour of
the Bank
**(3.43) General Security Agreement dated September 27, 1996 made
by Fantom Direct in favour of the Bank
**(3.44) General Assignment of Book Debts, etc. dated
September 27, 1996 made by Fantom Direct in favour of the
Bank
-44-
- ----------------
* Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F/A dated November 11, 1995.
** Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F dated November 14, 1996.
<PAGE>
**(3.45) Agreement dated September 8, 1995 between the Company and
Alan C. Hussey
**(3.46) Agreement dated September 8, 1995 between the Company and
Linda L. Watson
(3.47) Agreement dated May 8, 1997 between the Company and Joseph
A. Shillington
(3.48) Agreement dated May 20, 1997 between the Company and Paul
Smith
(3.49) Agreement dated July 14, 1997 between the Company and
Stephen Doorey
-45-
- ---------------------
** Incorporated by reference to File No. 0-26308, Registration Statement on
Form 20-F dated November 14, 1996.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the Requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Company certifies that it meets the requirements for filing on Form
20-F and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FANTOM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
(Company)
Dated: November 13, 1997 By: "Allan D. Millman"
----------------------------------
Name: Allan D. Millman
Title: President and
Chief Executive Officer
