INSTANT VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES INC
8-K/A, 2000-01-14
COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN
Previous: ADAM COM INC /DE/, S-3/A, 2000-01-14
Next: FIRST SEISMIC CORP, 10-K405, 2000-01-14





                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

       Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): December 17, 1999

                        INSTANT VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

                                    Delaware
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

         0-28079                                          84-1141967
(Commission File Number)                       (IRS Employer Identification No.)

         500 Sansome Street, Suite 503
         San Francisco, California                                      94111
         (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                     (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (415) 391-4455

                                 Not Applicable

          (Former name or former address, if Changed Since Last Report)


<PAGE>


Item 4.   Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.

         On December 17, 1999, KPMG LLP resigned as the independent  auditors of
Instant Video Technologies,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company").  The
independent  auditor's  report for the fiscal years ended  December 30, 1997 and
1998 contained no adverse  opinion,  disclaimer of opinion,  or qualification or
modification as to  uncertainty,  audit scope or accounting  principles.  During
fiscal  year 1998 and 1999 and through  the date of  resignation,  there were no
disagreements  between  the  Company  and KPMG LLP on any  matter of  accounting
principles or practices,  financial statement  disclosure,  or auditing scope or
procedure.

Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.

         (c)   Exhibits.

     16. Letter from KPMG LLP regarding its concurrence or disagreement with the
statements made in this report.


                                       2

<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

                  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,  the  registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date:  January 14, 2000

                              INSTANT VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                              By: ________________________________________

                              Name: Edward H. Davis
                              Title: General Counsel


                                       3

<PAGE>


EXHIBIT INDEX

         Exhibit
         Number                              Description
         -------                             -----------

         16              Letter  from KPMG  LLP,  former  independent  auditors,
                         regarding  its  concurrence  or  disagreement  with the
                         statements made in this report.


                                       4


[GRAPHIC LOGO]


          500 E. Middlefield Road
          Mountain View, CA 94043

December 30, 1999


Washington, D.C. 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously  principal  accountants for Instant Video Technologies,  Inc.
and  subsidiaries  (the  Company)  and,  under  the date of March 19,  1999,  we
reported on the consolidated  financial  statements of the Company as of and for
the years ended  December 31, 1998 and 1997.  On December 17, 1999, we resigned.
We have read the  Company's  statements  included  under  Item 4 of its Form 8-K
dated  December 27, 1999 and its Form 8-K/A dated December 28, 1999 and we agree
with such statements, except as follows:

In connection  with the audits of the two fiscal years ended  December 31, 1998,
and the  subsequent  interim  period  through  December 17, 1999,  there were no
disagreements with KPMG LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial  statement  disclosure,   or  auditing  scope  or  procedures,   which
disagreements if not resolved to our  satisfaction  would have caused us to make
reference  in  connection  with  our  opinion  to  the  subject  matter  of  the
disagreement.

Our audit reports on the consolidated  financial statements of the Company as of
and for the years ended  December 31, 1998 and 1997, did not contain any adverse
opinion or  disclaimer  of opinion,  nor were they  qualified  or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, as follows:

Our auditors' reports  contained a separate  paragraph stating that "the Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficit that
raise  substantial  doubt  about its  ability to  continue  as a going  concern.
Management's  plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The
consolidated  financial  statements  do not include any  adjustments  that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty."

Our letter to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company dated
May 1,  1998  included  certain  matters  involving  internal  control  and  its
operation  that we  considered  to be  reportable  condititons  under  standards
established  by the  American  Institute of Certified  Public  Accountants.  The
reportable condititons are summarized as follows:

During the third quarter of 1997, the Company identified certain  irregularities
with an  accounts  receivable  and cash  account  recorded  during the first and
second quarter.  The Company belived that revenue of approximately  $165,000 was
recognized  inappropriately  in the  first  quarter  and the  cash  receipts  of
$165,000 were inappropriately recorded in the second quarter.

In  addition,  we  understood  that  it was  alleged  that  the  former  CEO had
inappropriately spent corporate funds.

The Company did not have  financial  resources to provide a sufficient  internal
control  structure  to  prevent  or detect  the above  matters.  As a result,  a
material weakness in internal control existed within the Company.

Very truly yours.

/s/ KPMG LLP




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission