|
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant / / | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / / | ||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
/ / | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
/ / | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
/x/ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
/ / | Definitive Additional Materials | |
/ / | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Alliant Techsystems Inc. |
||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
|
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
/x/ | No fee required | |||
/ / | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
/ / | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
/ / | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
Paul David Miller | Alliant Techsystems Inc. | |
Chairman and | 600 Second Street N.E. | |
Chief Executive Officer | Hopkins, MN 55343-8384 |
June 27, 2000
It is my pleasure to invite you to attend the tenth Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ATK (Alliant Techsystems Inc.), which will be held at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 1, 2000, at our headquarters, 600 Second Street N.E., Hopkins (suburban Minneapolis), Minnesota.
The proposals to be considered at the meeting are described in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement that accompany this letter. We will also present a report on our business operations, and you will have an opportunity to ask questions.
Your vote on the proposals is important. You may vote by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the reply envelope provided. You may also vote by telephone if you are a stockholder of record. Whichever voting method you choose, you are encouraged to vote promptly. You may of course attend the meeting and vote in person.
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR all of the Board's nominees for election as directors, FOR approval of the ratification of the selection of independent accountants, and AGAINST the stockholder proposal described in the Proxy Statement. Your Board of Directors appreciates your support.
If you plan to attend the meeting, please let us know. If you vote by returning your proxy card, please complete and return the admission ticket request form printed on the inside back cover of the Proxy Statement. If you are a stockholder of record who votes by telephone, please indicate your intention to attend the meeting when prompted to do so.
I look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.
Paul David Miller
|
Page |
|
---|---|---|
Notice of Annual Meeting | i | |
General Information |
|
1 |
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1) |
|
7 |
Executive Compensation |
|
16 |
Ratification of Selection of Independent Accountants (Proposal No. 2) |
|
34 |
Stockholder Proposal (Proposal No. 3) |
|
34 |
Additional Information |
|
36 |
Appendix A |
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC.
600 Second Street N.E.
Hopkins, MN 55343-8384
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Date and time: | Tuesday, August 1, 2000, at 2:00 p.m. central time | |||
Place: |
|
Alliant Techsystems Inc. headquarters 600 Second Street N.E. Hopkins (suburban Minneapolis), Minnesota |
||
Proposals to be voted on: |
|
1. |
|
Election of eleven directors. |
2. | Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent accountants for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2001. | |||
3. | A stockholder proposal described in the Proxy Statement, if the proposal is presented at the meeting. | |||
4. | Any other business properly brought before the meeting. | |||
Record date: |
|
June 6, 2000 |
||
List of Stockholders: |
|
During ordinary business hours on the ten days prior to the date of the meeting, a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available in the Secretary's office at the Company's headquarters for inspection by stockholders for any purpose related to the meeting. |
||
Admission to the meeting: |
|
You will be admitted to the meeting only if you have a ticket. See the Important Reminders on the previous page for instructions on obtaining a ticket. |
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Daryl L. Zimmer, Secretary
June 27, 2000
i
ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC.
600 Second Street N.E.
Hopkins, MN 55343-8384
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
August 1, 2000
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING
Q: | What am I voting on? | |||
A: |
|
1. |
|
Reelection of all eleven directors currently serving on the Board of Directors. |
|
|
2. |
|
Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent accountants for the current fiscal year. |
|
|
3. |
|
A stockholder proposal that is described later in this Proxy Statement. If the stockholder proposal is not presented at the Annual Meeting, it will not be voted upon. |
Q: |
|
Who is soliciting my vote? |
A: |
|
Your Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement was prepared by our management for the Board of Directors. |
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? |
A: |
|
Stockholders can vote their shares of our Common Stock at the Annual Meeting if our records show that they owned their shares as of the close of business on June 6, 2000, which was the record date. |
Q: |
|
How do I vote? |
A: |
|
You may vote by mail or by telephone, as explained below: |
|
|
Voting by mail: You may vote by mail by signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. |
|
|
Voting by telephone: If you are a stockholder of record, which means that you hold a stock certificate for your shares, you may vote by telephone by using the toll-free number listed on your proxy card. |
Q: |
|
How do I vote if my shares are held by my broker or someone else in street name? |
A: |
|
If you are not a stockholder of record, you will receive voting instructions from the party that holds your shares of record for your account. |
|
|
You cannot vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain authorization from the party that holds your shares of record for your account. Your voting instructions from the record holder of your shares may contain instructions on how to obtain this authorization. |
|
|
|
1
Q: |
|
How do I vote if my shares are held in an ATK 401(k) plan? |
A: |
|
If you are a participant in one of our 401(k) plans, your proxy card will have a blue stripe on it, and you will receive a separate voting instruction letter. Whether you vote by mail or by telephone, you will be instructing the trustee how you wish to vote your shares. The trustee will vote your shares as you instruct. |
|
|
If you do not sign and return your proxy card by the deadline, the trustee will vote your shares, as well as any shares that have not been allocated to participant accounts, in the same manner and proportion as it votes shares for which it received voting instructions. |
|
|
You cannot vote your 401(k) plan shares at the Annual Meeting. |
Q: |
|
How do I vote if my shares are held in the ATK Employee Stock Purchase Plan? |
A: |
|
If you are a participant in our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, you will receive voting instructions from U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, which holds the shares of record for your account. |
Q: |
|
What shall I do if I receive more than one proxy card? |
A: |
|
If you receive more than one proxy card, it may be that: |
|
|
you hold shares in more than one accountsuch as individually of record, in one of our 401(k) plans, or in street name through a broker, or |
|
|
you have shares that are registered in different variations of your name. |
|
|
You should vote all of the shares for which you receive a proxy card. See the Important Reminders on the Table of Contents page for instructions on returning proxy cards received with return envelopes addressed to different return addresses. |
Q: |
|
How will my shares be voted if I don't mark my proxy card? |
A: |
|
You are encouraged to mark your proxy card indicating how you wish to vote your shares. If you do, your shares will be voted as you instruct, assuming that you properly sign your proxy card and that it is received in time to be voted at the Annual Meeting. If you properly sign and return your proxy card, but you do not indicate how you wish to vote your shares on a proposal, your shares will be voted as follows on that proposal: |
|
|
FOR all of the Board's nominees for election as directors (Proposal No. 1). |
|
|
FOR ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent accountants (Proposal No. 2). |
|
|
AGAINST the stockholder proposal (Proposal No. 3). |
Q: |
|
How can I change my vote? |
A: |
|
You can change your vote at any time before the vote is taken at the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you can change your vote by: |
|
|
signing and delivering to our Corporate Secretary a written request to revoke your proxy vote; |
|
|
signing and mailing a new, properly completed proxy card with a later date than your original proxy card; |
|
|
calling the toll-free number listed on your proxy card; or |
|
|
attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. |
|
|
If you are not a stockholder of record, you must instruct the party that holds your shares of record for your account of your desire to change your vote. |
|
|
|
2
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum at the Annual Meeting? |
A: |
|
On the record date, there were 9,457,663 shares of our Common Stock outstanding. This does not include 4,405,950 shares that were held in our treasury and cannot be voted. Each share is entitled to one vote. Holders of a majority of the shares outstanding must be present at the Annual Meeting in order for there to be a quorum. You will be considered present at the Annual Meeting if you are in attendance and vote your shares at the meeting, or if you have submitted a properly completed proxy card or properly voted by telephone. |
Q: |
|
How will abstentions and other non-votes affect the quorum and voting? |
A: |
|
If you withhold your vote on the election of directors or abstain from voting on any other proposal, you will still be considered present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. |
|
|
If you withhold your vote from a director nominee, this will reduce the number of votes cast for that nominee. |
|
|
If you abstain from voting on one of the other proposals, your shares will still be considered in determining the vote required to approve the proposal, so you will be deemed to have voted against that proposal. |
|
|
If shares are held in nominee street name, such as by a broker, and the nominee cannot vote the shares on a specific proposal because no voting instructions were received from the owner, the failure of the nominee to vote the shares is called a "broker non-vote." Shares affected by broker non-votes will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum because the shares will have been voted on at least one other proposal. Shares affected by broker non-votes will not, however, be considered in determining the vote required to approve the specific proposal on which the shares were not voted, and will not be deemed to have voted against the proposal. |
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve the proposals? |
A: |
|
If a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting: |
|
|
The eleven nominees for election as directors who receive the largest number of votes properly cast FOR, will be elected directors. |
|
|
Each other proposal properly presented at the Annual Meeting will be approved if a majority of the shares present at the Annual Meeting are properly voted FOR the proposal. |
Q: |
|
Who will tabulate the votes at the Annual Meeting? |
A: |
|
ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., our transfer agent, will provide inspectors of election to tabulate the votes cast before and at the Annual Meeting. |
|
|
|
3
Q: |
|
How will the solicitation of proxies be handled? |
A: |
|
Proxies are being solicited primarily by mail, but proxies may also be solicited personally, by telephone, facsimile and similar means. Our directors, officers and other employees may help with the solicitation without additional compensation. |
|
|
We have also retained ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. to assist in the solicitation of proxies at a fee of $6,500 plus out-of-pocket expenses. |
|
|
We will reimburse brokers, banks and other custodians and nominees for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy solicitation materials to the owners of the shares they hold. |
|
|
We will pay all other expenses of preparing, printing and mailing the proxy solicitation materials. |
OTHER QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS |
||
Q: |
|
What if other business is brought up at the Annual Meeting? |
A: |
|
Your Board of Directors does not intend to present any other matters for a vote at the Annual Meeting. The only stockholder proposal that can be presented at the Annual Meeting is the one included in this Proxy Statement as Proposal No. 3. No other stockholder has given the timely notice required by our By-Laws in order to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. Similarly, no additional candidates for election as a director can be nominated at the Annual Meeting because no stockholder has given the timely notice required by our By-Laws in order to nominate a candidate for election as a director at the Annual Meeting. If any other business is properly brought before the meeting, the person named as proxy on the proxy card will vote on the matter using his best judgment. |
|
|
Information regarding the requirements for submitting a stockholder proposal for consideration at next year's annual meeting, or nominating a candidate for election as a director at next year's annual meeting, can be found near the end of this Proxy Statement under the heading "FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS." |
Q: |
|
What if I want to attend the Annual Meeting? |
A: |
|
If you want to attend the Annual Meeting, you must have a ticket. See the Important Reminders on the Table of Contents page for instructions on obtaining a ticket. |
Q: |
|
Where are ATK's executive offices located? |
A: |
|
Our executive offices are located at 600 Second Street N.E., Hopkins, MN 55343-8384, which is also the location of the Annual Meeting. |
Q: |
|
When was this Proxy Statement mailed? |
A: |
|
This Proxy Statement was first mailed to stockholders on or about June 27, 2000. |
Q: |
|
What if I did not receive a copy of the Company's Annual Report? |
A: |
|
A copy of our Annual Report to stockholders for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2000, which we call fiscal year 2000, has been mailed to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. If you did not receive a copy, please write to us at our executive offices, or call us at (612) 931-6305. |
|
|
|
4
Q: |
|
Who are ATK's principal stockholders? |
A: |
|
We believe that the stockholder listed in the following table is the only stockholder that beneficially owned more than five percent of our Common Stock on the record date. |
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
Percent of Class |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neuberger Berman, Inc. Neuberger Berman, LLC and Affiliates Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio 605 Third Avenue New York, New York 10158-3698 |
955,303(1 | ) | 10.1 | % |
In addition, Fidelity Management Trust Company, the trustee of our 401(k) plans, held 693,680 shares (7.64%) of our Common Stock for the participants in the plans. However, the trustee has no power to dispose of these shares, except in connection with the distribution of shares to plan participants and the sale of shares to fund withdrawals by, or loans to, plan participants. The trustee must vote shares allocated to the accounts of plan participants as directed by participants. The trustee must vote unallocated shares and shares for which no participant direction is received in the same manner and proportion as it votes shares for which it receives directions from plan participants. As a result, the trustee disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock held by it in its capacity as trustee of the plans. During fiscal year 2000, ATK paid fees of approximately $1,624,000 to Fidelity Management Trust Company and its affiliates. These fees were for record keeping and for health and welfare administration, trustee services provided by them to our 401(k) plans, and for services provided by them in connection with the transfer to them of the administration of our Pension and Retirement Plan.
5
Name/Group |
Shares Owned Directly or Indirectly(1) |
Exercisable Stock Option Shares(2) |
Total Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent of Shares Outstanding(3) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frances D. Cook | 700 | | 700 | | |||||
Peter Bukowick(4) | 16,792 | 61,999 | 78,791 | | |||||
Gilbert F. Decker | 2,300 | | 2,300 | | |||||
Thomas L. Gossage | 3,400 | | 3,400 | | |||||
Jonathan G. Guss | 3,600 | | 3,600 | | |||||
David E. Jeremiah | 3,800 | | 3,800 | | |||||
Gaynor N. Kelley | 3,900 | | 3,900 | | |||||
Joseph F. Mazzella | 4,400 | | 4,400 | | |||||
Paul David Miller | 14,871 | 50,000 | 64,871 | | |||||
Michael T. Smith | 2,400 | | 2,400 | | |||||
Scott S. Meyers | 9,252 | 37,500 | 46,752 | | |||||
Robert W RisCassi | 600 | | 600 | | |||||
Paul A. Ross | 7,580 | 8,999 | 19,132 | | |||||
Nicholas G. Vlahakis | 455 | 12,396 | 12,851 | | |||||
All current directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons)(5) | 86,440 | 189,033 | 275,673 | 2.91 | % |
6
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
GENERAL INFORMATION
Our Certificate of Incorporation permits your Board of Directors to determine the number of directors, which cannot be less than three. The Board currently consists of eleven directors, eight of whom were elected by the stockholders at the 1999 annual meeting of stockholders. Two directors were elected to the Board at its regularly scheduled January 2000 board meeting, and one director was elected to the Board at its regularly scheduled May 2000 board meeting.
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS
Your Board of Directors has nominated for election as directors the nominees listed below, all of whom are currently directors. Each of these nominees was recommended by the Board's Nominating and Governance Committee and has agreed to serve, if elected. If you haven't withheld authority to vote for all directors or any individual director on your proxy card, your shares will be voted FOR the election of all of these nominees.
The directors elected will serve on the Board until their successors are elected, which should occur at the next annual meeting. Their Board service could end earlier if they should die, resign, retire, or be removed from office.
Although we don't know of any reason why any of these nominees might become unavailable for election, if that should happen, the Board may propose a substitute nominee. If you haven't withheld authority to vote for directors on your proxy card, your shares will be voted for any substitute nominee.
The list of nominees below includes information about their present principal occupations, recent business experience, and directorships in other companies.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election as directors of all of the nominees listed below (Proposal No. 1).
![]() |
||||
Frances D. Cook, age 54, director since January 2000 | ||||
| International business consultant. | |||
| Ambassador to the Sultanate of Oman from 1995-1999. | |||
| Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Political-Military Affairs from 1993-1995. | |||
| Ambassador to the Republic of Cameroon from 1989-1993. | |||
| Country Director for West Africa, Department of State from 1987-1989. | |||
| Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Refugee Affairs from 1986-1987. | |||
| Consul General, Alexandria, Egypt from 1983-1986. | |||
| Ambassador to the Republic of Burundi from 1980-1983. | |||
| Other directorships: ORYX Natural Resources. | |||
| Other activities: Senior Fellow, Center for Naval Analyses (CNA); Member of Council on Foreign Relations; the Harvard Club of NYC; the Army-Navy Club (Washington, D.C.); and The Washington Institute for Foreign Affairs, Phi Beta Kappa. |
7
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Gilbert F. Decker, age 63; director since December 1997 | ||||
| Executive Vice President, Operations of Walt Disney Imagineering (a provider of master planning, real estate development, attraction and show design, engineering and production support, project management and other development services to The Walt Disney Company) since April 1999. | |||
| Private consultant to electronics and aerospace companies from May 1997 to April 1999. Also held Chief Executive Officer positions with Xeruca Holding, Incorporated, and Penn Central Federal Systems Company. | |||
| Assistant Secretary of the Army-Research, Development and Acquisition from April 1994 to May 1997. | |||
| Other directorships: Anteon Corporation, Firearms Training Systems, Inc., MRJ Technology Solutions, Inc. and MP, Incorporated. | |||
| Other activities: Member of the National Advisory Committee to the Whiting School of Engineering of Johns Hopkins University and the Board on Army Science and Technology of the National Academy of Science. | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thomas L. Gossage, age 66; director since March 1995 | ||||
| Retired in January 1997 from Hercules Incorporated (a producer of specialty chemicals and related products), where he served as a director from 1989 until his retirement. | |||
| Chairman of the Board of Hercules from January 1991 to January 1997. | |||
| Chief Executive Officer of Hercules from January 1991 to August 1996. | |||
| President of Hercules from June 1992 to October 1995. | |||
| Other directorships: The Dial Corporation and Fluor Corporation. | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Jonathan G. Guss, age 41; director since August 1994 | ||||
| Director and Chief Executive Officer of Bogen Communications International, Inc. (a producer of sound processing equipment and telecommunications peripherals) since December 1997. | |||
| Principal and President of Active Management Group, Inc., a firm that provides turnaround management services, since May 1990. | |||
| Principal and Chief Executive Officer of EK Management Corp., the general partner of EK Associates, L.P., a limited partnership engaged in providing goods and services to the baking industry, since August 1992. |
|||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Admiral David E. Jeremiah, USN (Ret.), age 66; director since April 1995 | ||||
| Partner and President of Technology Strategies & Alliances Corporation (a strategic advisory and investment banking firm engaged primarily in the aerospace, defense, telecommunications and electronics industries) since February 1994, when he retired from military service after a 39-year career. | |||
| Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1990 to 1994. | |||
| Commander in Chief of the United States Pacific Fleet from 1987 to 1990. | |||
| Other directorships: GEOBOTICS, Inc., Litton Industries, Inc. and Wang Government Services, Inc. | |||
| Other activities: Director of the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, and a member of ManTech International Advisory Board, Northrop Grumman Corporation (Melbourne Division) Board of Visitors, the Board of Trustees for MITRE Corporation, and Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs Board of Advisors. |
8
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Gaynor N. Kelley, age 69; director since March 1995 | ||||
| Retired in June 1996 from The Perkin-Elmer Corporation (a manufacturer of analytical and biotechnology instrumentation) where he served as a director from 1984 until his retirement. | |||
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Perkin-Elmer from December 1990 to September 1995. | |||
| Other directorships: Hercules Incorporated and The Prudential Insurance Company of America. | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Joseph F. Mazzella, age 47; director since August 1994 | ||||
| Partner, law firm of Nutter, McLennen & Fish LLP, Boston, MA, since March 2000. | |||
| Formerly a partner with Lane Altman & Owens, Boston, MA, from 1980 to March 2000. | |||
| Other directorships: Data Transmission Network Corporation, Inforonics, Inc., and Insurance Auto Auctions, Inc. | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Scott S. Meyers, age 46; director since May 2000 | ||||
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since May 2000. | |||
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 1, 1996. | |||
| From January 1990 until March 1996, served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Magnavox Electronic Systems Company. | |||
| Other directorships: Minnesota Zoo. | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Admiral Paul David Miller, USN (Ret.), age 58; director since January 1999 | ||||
| Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 1999. President of the Company since March 2000. | |||
| President of Sperry Marine Inc. (a manufacturer of marine navigation and control systems) from November 1994 to January 1999. | |||
| Vice President of Litton Industries, Inc. (which acquired Sperry Marine Inc. in May 1996) from September 1997 to January 1999. | |||
| Prior to his retirement from the U.S. Navy in November 1994 following a 30-year career, he was Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Atlantic Command, one of five U.S. theater commands, and served concurrently as NATO Supreme Allied Commander-Atlantic. | |||
| Other directorships: Sun Trust Bank, mid-Atlantic. |
9
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Robert W. RisCassi, age 64; director since March 2000 | ||||
| Vice President of L-3 Communications Corporation, a leading merchant supplier of secure communications systems and products, avionics and ocean products, microwave components and telemetry, and space and wireless products since March 1997. | |||
| Executive with Loral Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation from October 1993 to March 1997. | |||
| Prior to his retirement from the U.S. Army in August 1993 following a 35-year career, he was Commander-in-Chief of the United Nations Command, ROK/U.S. Combined Forces Command, U.S. Forces Korea and Eighth U.S. Army. He served as the Vice Chief of Staff, U.S. Army from 1988-1990. | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Michael T. Smith, age 56; director since December 1997 | ||||
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hughes Electronics Corporation. | |||
| Vice Chairman of Hughes Electronics Corporation from 1992 to October 1997. | |||
| Other directorships: Chairman and director of PanAmSat Corporation, an affiliate of Hughes Electronics Corporation. | |||
| Other activities: Trustee of the Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences and of Providence College. |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND THE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
Standing Committees and Meetings of the Board and its Committees
Your Board of Directors has established the following standing committees: Audit, Executive/Finance, Nominating and Governance, and Personnel and Compensation. Membership on the Audit, Nominating and Governance, and Personnel and Compensation Committees consists entirely of non-employee directors.
10
The membership of the committees, the names of each committee's chair, and the number of meetings held by the Board and each of the committees during fiscal year 2000 are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
Nominating and Governance |
Personnel and Compensation |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Board of Directors |
|
Executive/ Finance |
|||||||
|
Audit |
|||||||||
Frances D. Cook | X | X | X | |||||||
Gilbert F. Decker | X | X | X | |||||||
Thomas L. Gossage | X | X | X | |||||||
Jonathan G. Guss | X | X | X | |||||||
David E. Jeremiah | X | X | X | |||||||
Gaynor N. Kelley | X | X | X | |||||||
Joseph F. Mazzella | X | X | X | |||||||
Scott S. Meyers | X | X | ||||||||
Paul David Miller | X | X | ||||||||
Robert W. RisCassi | X | X | X | |||||||
Michael T. Smith | X | X | X | |||||||
Committee chair | Mr. Guss | Adm. Miller | Mr. Gossage | Mr. Mazzella | ||||||
Number of meetings(1) | 8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
Each director attended at least 80% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the committees on which the director served.
11
Duties of the Committees
Audit Committee
Executive/Finance Committee
Nominating and Governance Committee
If you wish to recommend a person to the Nominating and Governance Committee for consideration as a candidate for election as a director at an annual meeting of stockholders, you should send your recommendation to our executive offices, c/o the Corporate Secretary, at least 120 days prior to the annual meeting. Your recommendation must be accompanied by information concerning the person's qualifications, and the written consent of the person to be nominated, if selected as a nominee by the Board of Directors, and to serve on the Board if elected. The Board has the sole discretion to select director nominees. Information regarding the requirements for nominating a person for election as a director at an annual meeting of stockholders can be found near the end of this Proxy Statement under the heading "FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS."
Personnel and Compensation Committee
12
The Personnel and Compensation Committee currently has a Section 16 Subcommittee that approves certain transactions involving our executive officers. These transactions include grants and awards involving our Common Stock, the acquisition of our Common Stock from the Company, and the disposition of our Common Stock to the Company. Section 16 Subcommittee approval is required if the transaction is not approved by the Board, and if advance approval of the transaction by the Board or a committee of two or more non-employee directors is required in order to qualify the transaction under the exemption provisions of Rule 16b-3 (d) and (e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. During fiscal year 2000, the Section 16 Subcommittee acted only by unanimous written consent. Current members of the Section 16 Subcommittee are Gaynor N. Kelley (Chair) and Jonathan G. Guss. A special committee of the Board is authorized to make limited stock awards to employees who are not subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. During fiscal year 2000, the special committee acted only by unanimous written consent. Paul David Miller is currently the sole member of this special committee.
Summary Compensation Information
Only non-employee directors receive compensation for service on the Board of Directors. Their compensation is summarized in the following table.
Compensation Feature |
Dollar Amount |
Number of Shares |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual retainer | $ | 20,000 | |||||
Meeting attendance fees: | |||||||
Board of Directors | 1,000 | ||||||
Committees: | |||||||
Chair | 1,000 | ||||||
Other members | 750 | ||||||
Per diem payments | 1,000 | ||||||
Annual restricted stock award | 600 |
The annual retainer is paid in quarterly installments. Per diem payments (and reimbursement of related expenses) are made for any day on which our Chief Executive Officer believes that a non-employee director has committed a significant part of the day (outside of normal Board or Board committee service) to business issues beyond the normal scope of the director's responsibilities as a director. During fiscal year 2000, no director received any per diem payment.
Description of Director Compensation Plans and Arrangements
Deferred Fee Plan for Non-Employee Directors
This plan permits a director to defer receipt of all or part of the director's cash fees. A director can elect to have deferred amounts either credited in cash to a "cash account," or in Common Stock
13
equivalents, called units, to a "share account" (based upon the market value of our Common Stock). Cash accounts are credited with interest quarterly at our one-year borrowing rate and share accounts will be credited with additional units if dividends are paid on our Common Stock. Payment of deferred amounts is made following the director's termination of Board service. Deferred amounts are always paid in cash, based upon the market value of our Common Stock in the case of share accounts. A director may elect to receive these payments either in a lump sum or in up to ten annual installments.
Currently, four directors are participating in this plan. The following table summarizes how they are currently having their deferred fees credited, and how many phantom Common Stock units were credited to their share accounts as of March 31, 2000.
Name |
Annual Retainer |
Meeting Fees |
Units as of March 31, 2000 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gilbert F. Decker | Cash account-25% | Cash account-25% | 427.8240 | |||
Share account-75% | Share account-75% | |||||
Gaynor N. Kelley | Share account-100% | 1039.2370 | ||||
Robert W. RisCassi | Share account-100% | Share account-100% | 52.8970 | |||
Michael T. Smith | Share account-100% | Share account-100% | 999.9729 |
Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan
Under this plan, each non-employee director receives automatic periodic awards of restricted Common Stock600 shares upon first being elected to the Board of Directors and 600 shares upon reelection at each subsequent annual meeting of stockholders. Common Stock issued under this plan entitles participating directors to all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote the shares and receive any cash dividends. All shares are, however, subject to certain restrictions against sale or transfer for a period starting on the award date and ending on the earlier of:
or
14
If a director leaves the Board for any other reason prior to the expiration of the restricted period, the director forfeits all rights in shares for which the restricted period has not expired.
Shares of restricted stock awarded under a similar predecessor plan are subject to similar restrictions. The restricted period on these shares will expire either on a specific date previously selected by the director, or on a future date designated by the director at least two years in advance of the designated date.
The following table summarizes how many shares of our Common Stock each non-employee director holds that are still subject to the restrictions of the above plans:
Name |
Number of Shares |
|
---|---|---|
Frances D. Cook | 600 | |
Gilbert F. Decker | 1,800 | |
Thomas L. Gossage | 1,800 | |
Jonathan G. Guss | 3,400 | |
David E. Jeremiah | 1,800 | |
Gaynor N. Kelley | 2,400 | |
Joseph F. Mazzella | 2,900 | |
Robert W. RisCassi | 600 | |
Michael T. Smith | 1,800 |
The shares listed in the above table are included in the director and executive officer stock ownership table shown earlier in this Proxy Statement as being owned directly by each director.
Expense Reimbursement
Non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel and other expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.
Indemnification Agreements
We currently have indemnification agreements with our directors. These agreements require us to:
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
In May 1996, the Board established a non-employee director stock ownership guideline of 3,500 shares to be achieved in five years following election to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board is expected to:
15
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions between the Company and its directors, executive officers and entities in which directors have an affiliation or interest is included later in this Proxy Statement in the sections entitled "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Other Plans and Agreements with Executive Officers" under the heading "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION."
This section provides information regarding our executive compensation programs, and includes the following sections:
REPORT OF THE PERSONNEL AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD ON
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We, as the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board, have overall responsibility for compensation actions affecting the Company's executive officers. Our responsibilities include:
Our duties are described more fully earlier in this Proxy Statement in the section entitled "Duties of the Committees" under the heading "INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES." All of us are directors who are neither current nor former employees of the Company.
16
Compensation Philosophy
General
The goal of the Company's executive compensation program is to encourage and reward individual and Company performance. The program has been designed to recognize individual and business unit accountability and achievement, and to link executive compensation to the Company's performance, and increasing stockholder value.
The components of the program are:
Compensation Surveys
In order to help establish competitive executive compensation benefits, we consider the comparable practices of companies participating in two nationally known compensation surveys. The companies participating in these surveys represent both the aerospace and defense industry and other industries. The results of these surveys are adjusted to reflect the Company's revenue size, so that the comparisons are made to the practices of employers of a similar size.
The target compensation levels for the Company's executives are set at the median level of those survey participants used for comparative purposes. The compensation of individual executives varies above or below the median market level, depending upon the executive's overall accountabilities, individual performance and the Company's performance.
Performance Accountability System
The assessment of the performance of individual executives emphasizes objective achievements under a Performance Accountability System. Results-based accountabilities are established for each executive. Each executive's accountabilities are established annually and are uniquely tailored to the executive's job responsibilities.
The executive's performance against these accountabilities determines the executive's base salary adjustments and annual incentive payments. The process for measuring individual performance against these accountabilities is as objective as possible, but may involve subjective assessments. The relative importance of each individual's accountabilities varies, so no weighting can be assigned that applies in all cases.
Executive Compensation Program Components
Base Salaries
Base salaries are intended to provide a foundation for attracting and retaining key employees. Base salaries vary based upon position, responsibility and individual performance. As a result, the base salary component of executive compensation is the least variable with Company performance. Base salaries of executive officers are reviewed annually during the first quarter of the fiscal year. Whether an executive receives a base salary increase depends upon many factors, such as:
17
Fiscal Year 2000 Base Salary Increases
All of the current Named Executive Officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table following this report, except Paul David Miller, received a base salary increase during fiscal year 2000. Admiral Miller's current base salary was established when he joined the Company in January 1999. Information regarding Admiral Miller's compensation arrangement is included later in this Proxy Statement under the heading "OTHER PLANS AND AGREEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS."
Annual Incentive Compensation
All executive officers participate in the Company's Management Compensation Plan. This plan provides the opportunity for annual cash and stock incentive compensation. The goal of this plan is to motivate executives to a high level of performance by making a significant portion of their annual compensation contingent upon:
Each fiscal year we approve:
Participants are advised of their individual target incentive amounts at the start of the fiscal year. The individual target incentive amounts are added together to determine the total incentive fund for the organizational units where the individuals work. These organizational units include the Company's subsidiary business units, groups and the corporate staff.
An organization weighting structure is used to determine how each organizational unit's incentive will be affected by overall Company performance and the performance of the unit and/or subunit. For example:
Each organizational unit's earned incentive fund is calculated separately after the end of the fiscal year. The amount of the fund can range from zero to 200% of its target incentive fund, depending upon overall Company, business unit and/or subunit performance, whichever is applicable. We have the ability to increase a fund to 300% of its target. If the earned incentive fund for the corporate staff is zero, each business unit's earned incentive fund is reduced by 50%.
Earned incentive funds are divided among participants based 25% upon their relative individual performance and 75% upon their organizational unit's performance. The maximum incentive payable to an individual participant is 300% of the individual's target incentive.
The Committee must approve incentive awards to executive officers. We consider the Chief Executive Officer's assessment of the individual performance of executive officers. To further the goal of creating a strong and direct link between the compensation of key employees and shareholder value, we encourage executive officers to convert a portion of their annual incentive payment to stock. This can be done either in the form of common stock shares or deferred stock units (for those participants in the Management
18
Deferred Compensation Plan). To encourage the conversion of their annual incentive payment to stock, the amount of incentive to be converted is divided by 85% of the Company's common stock price as of the date the incentive payment is approved. Four of the named executive officers converted their above-target FY00 incentive payment to Company common stock or stock units.
The Chief Executive Officer's incentive target is established separately and any incentive payment is based upon:
Fiscal Year 2000 Annual Incentive Compensation
Approximately one hundred ten employees participated in the Management Compensation Plan for fiscal year 2000. The fiscal year 2000 goals were as follows:
Organizational Unit |
Weighting |
||
---|---|---|---|
Company as a whole: | |||
EPS | one-half | ||
Cash flow | one-half | ||
Business units: |
|
|
|
EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) | one-half | ||
Cash flow | one-half |
Earnings (represented by EPS and EBIT) was selected as one of the performance goals because we believe that:
Cash flow was selected as a performance goal because of the importance of generating and managing cash to fund the Company's business activities.
The EPS, EBIT and cash flow goals were based upon the Company's internal operating plan.
For fiscal year 2000, we approved incentive payments to all current Named Executive Officers that were above target. The amount by which these payments exceeded their target amount depended upon the extent to which the Company as a whole exceeded its goals.
The Company's compensation arrangement with its current Chief Executive Officer, Paul David Miller, establishes a target annual incentive of $400,000. We approved an incentive payment based upon the above-target percentage paid to other corporate executives.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
The goal of long-term incentive compensation is to:
19
Long-term incentive compensation is provided to executive officers under the Company's 1990 Equity Incentive Plan, principally through a combination of annual grants of market price stock options and periodic performance share grants. The terms of each grant are determined by us at the time the grant is awarded, subject to the provisions of the plan. We believe that both types of grants serve as an effective means to encourage retention of key executives.
Stock Options
We believe that stock options are an appropriate means of long-term incentive compensation because they provide value only when the Company's stockholders benefit from stock price appreciation.
During fiscal year 2000, stock options were granted to all current executive officers. The terms of these grants are summarized following the table labeled "OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR" later in this Proxy Statement. During fiscal year 2000, two stock option grants were made to current executive officers. Stock options were granted in May 1999 as has been done in the past. At its January 2000 meeting, the Board of Directors changed the award date of stock option grants from May to January, thus, the calendar year 2000 stock option grants were awarded in January 2000. Thus, stock option grants for two calendar years are represented in fiscal year 2000, which is a transition year.
Performance Shares
We believe that performance shares are an appropriate means of long-term incentive compensation because they provide an effective incentive to achieve predetermined long-term performance goals.
During fiscal year 2000, performance shares were granted to nine current executive officers. The terms of the grants to Named Executive Officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table following this report are summarized following the table labeled "LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANSAWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR" later in this Proxy Statement.
Award Considerations
The target long-term incentive grant amount for each executive officer's award of stock options and, where applicable, performance shares, was based upon a percentage (based upon competitive long-term incentive values) of the grant recipient's base salary. We determined the actual size of the grants by adjusting the target number of shares up or down after consideration of the subjective recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer. The size of these grants was determined without regard to the amount and terms of stock options already held by the grant recipients.
The extent to which an executive officer retains Common Stock acquired through annual and long-term incentive compensation awards will be a factor in determining the extent of the officer's participation in future long-term incentive compensation awards. The weight given to this factor is in our sole subjective judgment. We consider the reasons for an executive officer's sale of any of this Common Stock.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In early 1997 Common Stock ownership guidelines were established for executive officers. We believe that these guidelines will advance our goal of aligning the interests of the Company's executive officers
20
with those of the Company's stockholders. The guidelines establish target levels of Common Stock ownership that are a function of each officer's base salary, as follows:
Position |
Guideline Stock Having a Market Value Equal To: |
|
---|---|---|
Chief Executive Officer | 4 times base salary | |
Chief Financial Officer, and all Group Vice Presidents | 2 times base salary | |
All other executive officers | 1 times base salary |
The failure of an executive officer to achieve target ownership will be a factor when we consider future long-term incentive awards to that officer. As previously discussed, to further the goal of creating a strong and direct link between the compensation of key employees and shareholder value, and to assist executive officers to achieve their target ownership, we encourage the conversion of their annual incentive payment to stock. The amount of incentive to be converted is divided by 85% of the Company's common stock price as of the date the incentive payment is approved.
Limit on Tax Deductibility
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a cap of $1 million on the amount the Company can deduct for any tax year for compensation to any person who is the Chief Executive Officer or one of the four other highest compensated officers as of the end of the tax year. However, exempt from this deductibility cap are amounts payable under certain pre-existing agreements and amounts qualifying as performance-based compensation. In order for incentive compensation to qualify as performance based compensation, it must be determined based upon pre-established objective performance goals approved by stockholders.
We design stock option grants so that they qualify for the exemption from the deductibility cap. Other long-term incentive awards may not qualify for exemption from the deductibility cap. We will take into account the likelihood of such non-deductibility when determining the amount and recipients of these awards.
Annual incentive compensation payable under the Management Compensation Plan does not qualify for exemption from the deductibility cap because it involves the flexibility to make subjective determinations regarding the recipients and amounts of payments. We believe that this is sound executive compensation policy and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. We will take into account, when approving annual incentive compensation payments, whether any portion of the payments may be non-deductible by the Company. We believe that the benefit of being able to evaluate the performance of the Company's executive officers on important subjective performance measures outweighs the cost resulting from a portion of an officer's compensation being nondeductible under the Section 162(m) limitation described above.
Compensation payments to the Chief Executive Officer during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2001 will include base salary, the incentive bonus for fiscal year 2000 reported in the Summary Compensation Table following this report, the value of restricted stock that becomes non-forfeitable, and other items of compensation. To the extent incentive compensation is deferred, these amounts will not likely exceed
21
$1 million, and be non-deductible to the extent of the excess. No other executive officers are currently expected to be paid non-exempt compensation exceeding $1 million during fiscal year 2001.
Personnel and Compensation Committee
Joseph
F. Mazzella, Chair
Jonathan G. Guss
David E. Jeremiah
Gaynor N. Kelley
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
No member of the Personnel and Compensation Committee is either a current or former employee of ours. There are no compensation committee interlocks, which means that none of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of another entity that has an executive officer serving on our Board of Directors or its Personnel and Compensation Committee.
During fiscal year 2000, we had transactions with the following directors, or entities in which the following directors have an affiliation or interest: Joseph F. Mazzella and Michael T. Smith. The amounts involved in these transactions during fiscal year 2000 were, in the case of each director, less than the amount above which disclosure is required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the case of Mr. Mazzella, the transactions involved payments for legal services provided by the law firm of Lane Altman & Owens, of which Mr. Mazzella was a partner.
22
The following graph compares, for the five fiscal years ended March 31, 2000, the cumulative total return for our Common Stock with the comparable cumulative total return of two indexes:
The graph assumes that on April 1, 1995, $100 was invested in our Common Stock (at the closing price on the previous trading day) and in each of the indexes. The comparison assumes that all dividends, if any, were reinvested. The graph indicates the dollar value of each hypothetical $100 investment as of March 31 in each of the years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
23
The following Summary Compensation Table shows summary compensation information for some of our executive officers, who are called "Named Executive Officers." The compensation information is shown for the last three fiscal years. The Named Executive Officers are:
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation |
|
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
Payments |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Annual Compensation(1) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards(3) ($) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position |
Year(2) |
Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Other Annual Compensation ($) |
Securities Underlying Options (#) |
LTIP Payouts(4) ($) |
All Other Compensation(5) ($) |
||||||||||||||||
Paul David Miller | FY00 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 24,645 | -0- | 75,000 | -0- | $ | 35,523 | |||||||||||
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | FY99 | 150,000 | 161,000 | -0- | $ | 1,071,688 | 150,000 | -0- | 5,200 | ||||||||||||||
Peter A. Bukowick | FY00 | $ | 400,008 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 589 | -0- | -0- | $ | 149,600 | -0- | |||||||||||
President and Chief | FY99 | 365,843 | 345,500 | 8,839 | -0- | 80,000 | -0- | $ | 9,710 | ||||||||||||||
Operating Officer(6) | FY98 | 289,386 | 264,000 | 8,839 | -0- | 5,000 | -0- | 14,112 | |||||||||||||||
Scott S. Meyers | FY00 | $ | 272,504 | $ | 302,000 | $ | 6,384 | -0- | 50,000 | $ | 149,600 | $ | 23,463 | ||||||||||
Vice President and Chief | FY99 | 258,338 | 193,200 | 6,384 | -0- | 4,500 | -0- | 21,990 | |||||||||||||||
Financial Officer(7) | FY98 | 248,340 | 193,600 | 6,384 | -0- | 4,500 | -0- | 21,975 | |||||||||||||||
Paul A. Ross | FY00 | $ | 246,672 | $ | 275,000 | $ | 5,893 | -0- | 14,000 | -0- | $ | 12,078 | |||||||||||
Senior Group Vice President | FY99 | 224,992 | 188,300 | 7,633 | $ | 564,844 | 4,000 | -0- | 14,054 | ||||||||||||||
Aerospace | FY98 | 194,766 | 200,000 | -0- | -0- | 3,500 | -0- | 4,895 | |||||||||||||||
Nicholas G. Vlahakis | FY00 | $ | 216,674 | $ | 220,000 | $ | 6,384 | -0- | 11,500 | $ | 4,706 | ||||||||||||
Group Vice President | FY99 | 196,670 | 106,500 | -0- | -0- | 3,500 | -0- | 5,169 | |||||||||||||||
Conventional Munitions(8) | FY98 | 157,440 | 91,640 | -0- | -0- | 5,000 | -0- | 5,090 |
24
payable under the program, which are subject to tax withholding. The actual net cash payments to the individuals were less than reported above by the amount of the applicable withholding taxes. We have no agreement with the executive officers named in (d) above that they will receive or be allocated an interest in any cash surrender value under their life insurance policies. "OTHER PLANS AND AGREEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS."
25
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table summarizes for each of the Named Executive Officers information regarding stock option grants they received during fiscal year 2000.
|
Individual Grants |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
% of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year |
|
|
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term |
||||||||||||
|
Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted (#)(1) |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Name |
Exercise or Base Price ($/Share) |
Expiration Date |
0% ($)(2) |
5% ($)(2) |
10% ($)(2) |
||||||||||||
Paul David Miller | 75,000 | 21.27 | % | $ | 61.125 | 12/21/2009 | -0- | $ | 2,883,089 | $ | 7,306,313 | ||||||
Peter A. Bukowick | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | ||||||||||
Scott S. Meyers | 30,000 | 8.51 | % | $ | 84.5626 | 05-14-09 | -0- | $ | 1,595,427 | $ | 4,043,125 | ||||||
20,000 | 5.67 | % | $ | 65.9375 | 01-25-10 | -0- | $ | 829,355 | $ | 2,101,748 | |||||||
Paul A. Ross | 4,000 | 1.13 | % | $ | 84.5626 | 05-14-09 | -0- | $ | 212,724 | $ | 539,083 | ||||||
10,000 | 2.84 | % | $ | 65.9375 | 01-25-10 | -0- | $ | 414,677 | $ | 1,050,874 | |||||||
Nicholas G. Vlahakis | 3,500 | .99 | % | $ | 84.5626 | 05-14-09 | -0- | $ | 186,133 | $ | 471,698 | ||||||
8,000 | 2.27 | % | $ | 65.9375 | 01-25-10 | -0- | $ | 331,742 | $ | 840,699 |
|
Per Share Price on Option Expiration Date at Assumed Annual Appreciation Rates |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Option Expiration Date |
0% |
5% |
10% |
||||||
05-14-09 | $ | 82.56 | $ | 134.48 | $ | 214.14 | |||
12-21-09 | $ | 61.13 | 99.57 | 158.56 | |||||
01-25-10 | $ | 65.94 | 107.41 | 171.03 |
26
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table summarizes for each of the Named Executive Officers the number of shares, if any, they acquired during fiscal year 2000 upon the exercise of stock options, the value realized upon the exercise, and the number of, and the value of, the exercisable and unexercisable "in-the-money" stock options each of them held at the end of fiscal year 2000.
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options At FY00 Year-End (#) |
|
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at FY00 Year-End ($)(2) |
||||||||||||
|
Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized ($)(1) |
|||||||||||||
Name |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
|||||||||||
Paul David Miller | -0- | -0- | 50,000 | 175,000 | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | |||||||
Peter A. Bukowick | -0- | -0- | 61,999 | 55,001 | (3) | $ | 689,662 | $ | 24,588 | (3) | |||||
Scott S. Meyers | -0- | -0- | 24,500 | 54,500 | $ | 269,250 | $ | 22,125 | |||||||
Paul A. Ross | -0- | -0- | 13,666 | 17,834 | $ | 205,662 | $ | 17,213 | |||||||
Nicholas G. Vlahakis | -0- | -0- | 9,063 | 15,501 | $ | 101,376 | $ | 14,750 |
27
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANSAWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table summarizes for each of the Named Executive Officers information regarding long-term incentive plan awards, if any, they received during fiscal year 2000.
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Stock Price-Based Plans |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Shares, Units or Other Rights (#)(1) |
|
||||||||
|
Performance or Other Period Until Maturation or Payout |
|||||||||
Name |
Threshold (#)(2) |
Target (#)(2) |
Maximum (#)(2) |
|||||||
Paul David Miller | 4,000 | 04/01/99-03/31/00 | 1,000 | 2,000 | 4,000 | |||||
Paul David Miller | 4,000 | 04/01/99-03/31/01 | 1,000 | 2,000 | 4,000 | |||||
Paul David Miller | 4,000 | 04/01/99-03/31/01 | 1,000 | 2,000 | 4,000 | |||||
Paul David Miller | 4,000 | 04/01/99-03/31/02 | 1,000 | 2,000 | 4,000 | |||||
Peter A. Bukowick | 1,750 | (3) | 04/01/99-03/31/01 | 750 | 1,250 | 1,750 | ||||
Peter A. Bukowick | 1,750 | (3) | 04/01/99-03/31/02 | 750 | 1,250 | 1,750 | ||||
Scott S. Meyers | 1,350 | 04/01/99-03/31/01 | 650 | 1,000 | 1,350 | |||||
Scott S. Meyers | 1,350 | 04/01/99-03/31/02 | 650 | 1,000 | 1,350 | |||||
Paul A. Ross | 1,350 | 04/01/99-03/31/01 | 650 | 1,000 | 1,350 | |||||
Paul A. Ross | 1,350 | 04/01/99-03/31/02 | 650 | 1,000 | 1,350 | |||||
Nicholas G. Vlahakis | 1,000 | 04/01/99-03/31/01 | 500 | 750 | 1,000 | |||||
Nicholas G. Vlahakis | 1,000 | 04/01/99-03/31/02 | 500 | 750 | 1,000 |
All executive officers participate in our Pension and Retirement Plan. Their benefits are calculated differently, depending upon whether they ever participated in a predecessor plan. The benefits of Scott S. Meyers will be calculated using the formula that applied to participants in the Retirement Plan. The benefits of Paul David Miller, Peter A. Bukowick, Paul A. Ross and Nicholas G. Vlahakis will be calculated using the formula that applied to participants in the predecessor Aerospace Pension Plan.
28
Retirement Plan
Prior to April 1, 1992, a participant's accrued benefit under the Retirement Plan was based upon a final average earnings formula identical to that provided under the Honeywell Retirement Benefit Plan in effect at the time of the spin-off of our initial business operations by Honeywell Inc. in September 1990. Effective April 1, 1992, the Retirement Plan was amended to provide benefits based upon a cash balance account established for each participant. Participants in the Retirement Plan as of March 31, 1992 had an initial balance in their account as of April 1, 1992 equal to the present value of the benefits earned under the final average earnings formula as of that date. Newly hired employees start with an account balance of zero.
Each participant's cash balance account is credited monthly with a percentage of recognized compensation, which is generally their compensation subject to federal income tax withholding. The amount of the percentage increases with length of credited service from 3.5% for newly hired employees to 8.5% for employees with at least 25 years of service. Accounts are credited with an additional percentage on the amount by which recognized compensation exceeds the Social Security wage base. The amount of this additional percentage increases with length of credited service from 3.5% for newly hired employees to 5.5% for employees with at least 10 years of service. Account balances are credited monthly with interest equal to the average one-year U.S. Treasury Bill rate during the 12 months ending September 30 of the prior calendar year. A participant's account balance vests after five years of credited service. At retirement, which may occur at or after age 55, a participant's vested account balance is payable as a monthly annuity or, if retirement occurs at or after age 62, as an optional lump sum payment.
Participants whose age plus years of credited service equaled 50 as of March 31, 1992, will, upon retirement, have their benefit calculated under the prior final average earnings formula and the new cash balance formula and will receive the higher accrued benefit. The prior final average earnings formula provides a monthly life annuity related to years of credited service, average recognized compensation during the highest consecutive 60 of the last consecutive 120 months of credited service, and the participant's primary Social Security benefit. Participants may retire on or after age 55. Benefits are reduced on an approximately proportionate basis for credited service of less than 30 years. Participants whose age plus years of credited service equal 85 or more may retire on or after age 60 with no reduction in their age 65 benefit, and with a 3/10% reduction in such benefit for each month that retirement precedes age 60.
Aerospace Pension Plan
The Aerospace Pension Plan covered employees who joined us in connection with the acquisition of Hercules Aerospace Company from Hercules Incorporated, and contains provisions identical to those of the Hercules plan that covered them prior to the acquisition. Retirement benefits under the Aerospace Pension Plan are determined under a final average earnings formula. The formula provides a monthly life annuity related to years of credited service, average recognized compensation during the highest five years of credited service, and the participant's primary Social Security benefit. Participants may elect to receive up to 51% of their benefit in a lump sum payment. Participants with at least 10 years of credited service may retire at age 60 with no reduction in their age 65 benefit, and with a reduced benefit on or after age 55. Employees who participated in the predecessor Hercules plan since on or before December 31, 1984, may retire with a reduced benefit on or after age 50. The benefits of participants electing early retirement are reduced 5% for each year that retirement precedes the age at which they are entitled to an unreduced benefit, except that this reduction percentage is decreased for each year of credited service in excess of 30 years.
Supplemental Employee Retirement Plans
Retirement benefits payable from qualified defined benefit plans are limited by the Internal Revenue Code. Amounts payable under the Pension and Retirement Plan in excess of those limitations are paid by
29
us under a nonqualified supplemental employee retirement plan, called a SERP. We have a similar SERP that provides retirement benefits under the prior final average earnings formula for former Honeywell employees in connection with deferred incentive compensation that was not considered recognized compensation. We have established a grantor trust under which we have set aside funds to satisfy certain of our obligations under the SERPs. If the funds in the trust are insufficient to pay amounts payable under the SERPs, we will pay the deficiency.
Estimated Retirement Benefits
The following table shows the estimated retirement benefit payable annually as a single life annuity at age 65 to each of the current Named Executive Officers.
Name |
Estimated Annual Retirement Benefit |
||
---|---|---|---|
Paul David Miller | $ | 161,622 | |
Scott S. Meyers | 170,626 | ||
Paul A. Ross | 56,082 | ||
Nicholas G. Vlahakis | 179,302 |
These estimated retirement benefits assume currently applicable interest rates, and that the individuals remain employed until age 65 at their fiscal year 2000 compensation level, including an annual incentive bonus equal to either their annual incentive bonus for fiscal year 2000, or their average annual incentive bonus for the three fiscal years ended March 31, 2000, whichever is applicable. Mr. Bukowick's nonqualified monthly retirement annuity payment is $12,136, and his qualified monthly retirement annuity payment is $2,501. Upon his retirement, Mr. Bukowick received a one-time lump sum payment of $415,946.02 which he elected to roll over into his 401(k) plan with the Company.
30
CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
Income Security Plan
Our Income Security Plan is intended to secure the continued services, dedication and objectivity of management personnel in the event of a potential change of control, so that they are not hindered or distracted by the resulting personal uncertainties and risks. All executive officers participate in the Income Security Plan. In the event of a Qualifying Termination, the Income Security Plan, as amended, includes provisions that the participant will receive:
If a participant competes with us during the one-year period following the date of termination, we will stop paying them benefits under the plan. Participants in the Income Security Plan must agree that their future stock awards will not be subject to the change of control provisions of the our 1990 Equity Incentive Plan. They agree instead, that upon a Qualifying Termination, unvested stock awards will vest and become exercisable until the earlier of their normal expiration or the expiration of three years from the date of termination.
We estimate, based upon available fiscal year 2000 information that we can quantify, that if a change of control had occurred on the date of this Proxy Statement, and if the employment of any of the current Named Executive Officers had been terminated on the date of the change of control, they would receive total compensation payments in the following amounts: Paul David Miller, $3,785,550; Scott S. Meyers, $1,761,330; Paul A. Ross, $1,452,144; and Nicholas G. Vlahakis, $1,219,680.
Because the Income Security Plan provides for some benefits that we cannot calculate at this time (such as welfare benefits), the amounts actually paid would be larger than the above estimates. These estimates also do not include any additional amounts that would be paid to cover the excise taxes referred to above. These excise tax gross-up payments would likely be significant.
We have established a grantor trust under which we will set aside funds to satisfy our obligations under the Income Security Plan in the event of a change of control, or earlier at the discretion of your Board of Directors.
Executive Compensation Plan Provisions
Our Management Compensation Plan, under which annual incentive compensation is paid to executive officers provides for an accelerated incentive payment in the event of a change of control during a performance period. The payment would be pro-rata, based upon the elapsed portion of the performance period, assuming performance that would result in payment of the target incentive fund.
Under the terms of our 1990 Equity Incentive Plan, upon a change of control, all stock options, whether or not vested, become exercisable, all shares of restricted stock become fully vested, and a pro-rata portion of performance share awards becomes payable. As noted above, these provisions do not apply to participants in our Income Security Plan.
31
Non-vested benefits under our 401(k) plans become fully vested immediately upon a change of control. Non-vested benefits of participants in our Pension and Retirement Plan who have their benefits calculated using the Retirement Plan formula will become fully vested immediately upon a change of control.
Definitions
For purposes of stock grants under our 1990 Equity Incentive Plan prior to August 4, 1998, and the other executive compensation plans referred to above, "change of control" means, subject to some exceptions:
Beneficial ownership excludes any shares acquired directly from us under a written agreement with us.
For purposes of stock grants under our 1990 Equity Incentive Plan on or after August 4, 1998, and our Income Security Plan, the following terms have the following definitions:
32
OTHER PLANS AND AGREEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Management Deferred Compensation Plan
Our Management Deferred Compensation Plan permits participating executive officers to defer receipt of up to 70% of their base salaries and up to 100% of their annual incentive compensation. Deferred amounts accrue returns based upon investment options, one of which is our Common Stock units, selected by the participant. Deferred amounts are always paid in cash, based upon the market value of our Common Stock in the case of the investment election. Payments are generally made following termination of employment, but the plan permits on-demand distributions, which are subject to a 10% penalty, and provides for pre-selected in-service distributions, financial hardship distributions and distributions in the event of total disability.
Currently, four of the Named Executive Officers participate in this plan. No phantom Common Stock units were credited to their deferral accounts as of March 31, 2000.
Other Agreements
The initial stock option and restricted stock awards under our 1990 Equity Incentive Plan required the employee who received the award to agree to enter into an Employment Restrictions Agreement. This agreement obligates the employee not to divulge confidential and proprietary business information to third parties and not to work for a competitor or solicit other employees to leave our employ for a period of two years following the employee's termination of employment. Daryl L. Zimmer is a party to such an agreement.
We currently have indemnification agreements with our executive officers providing indemnification relating to their service as officers. This indemnification is identical to that described earlier in this Proxy Statement in the section entitled "Indemnification Agreements" under the heading "COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS."
Our employment arrangement with Paul David Miller provides for a minimum base salary of $600,000 per year, a minimum target incentive of $400,000 per year, Flexible Perquisite Account Program reimbursement up to $20,000 per year, financial counseling reimbursement up to $20,000 during his first year of employment and $10,000 during subsequent years, and term life insurance of $1,500,000.
Our employment arrangement with Scott S. Meyers provides for a minimum base salary of $240,000 per year, a minimum target annual incentive of $105,000, Flexible Perquisite Account Program reimbursement up to $16,000 per year, financial counseling reimbursement up to $6,500 per year, and term life insurance of $500,000.
33
PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
Your Board of Directors has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent accountants to audit our consolidated books and accounts for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2001. This selection, which was made upon the recommendation of the Board's Audit Committee, is subject to ratification by the stockholders. Deloitte & Touche LLP were the independent accountants for the portion of our business that was owned by Honeywell Inc. prior to the spin-off, and have been our independent accountants since the spin-off. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent accountants (Proposal No. 2).
PROPOSAL NO. 3
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
Ten stockholders, who claim to be the beneficial owners of a total of 540 shares of our Common Stock, have each submitted the following proposal for consideration by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The names and addresses of the proponents and the number of shares of Common Stock claimed to be owned by each of them are set forth on Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.
WHEREAS the U.S. exports weapons and related military services through foreign military sales (government-to-government), direct commercial sales of weapons (U.S. companies to foreign buyers), leases of equipment, transfers of excess defense articles, and emergency drawdowns of weaponry. In FY 1998 the U.S. delivered more than $13.5 billion worth of military products and services through government-to-government contracts, and the State Department authorized more than $23.1 billion in export licenses for direct commercial sales.
Several recent times that the U.S. sent troops into combat in significant numbers (e.g., Panama and Somalia), they faced adversaries that had previously received U.S. weapons or military technology.
In FY 1998 Alliant ranked 31st among Department of Defense contractors with awards of more than $324 million.
Alliant reported export sales from the U.S. to unaffiliated customers were $61.8 million, $33.2 million and $58.0 million, for fiscal years 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Alliant also reported U.S. Government sales, including sales to U.S. Government prime contractors, for FY 1999 were $828.8 million. During FY 1999, approximately 76 percent of sales were derived from contracts with the U.S. Government or U.S. Government prime contractors. Approximately 50% of FY 1999 net sales were derived from prime contractor activities; approximately 50% from subcontractor activities. Approximately 38% of such sales were derived from business with the U.S. Army, 22% from the U.S. Air Force, 10% from the U.S. Navy, and 30% from other government, commercial or international sources. (form 10-K)
Alliant offers a great variety of products, components and services. Among them are: medium-and large-caliber ammunition, munitions propellants, tactical missile propulsion systems, warheads for Maverick and AMRAAM missile systems, composite structures for weapons systems, infrared decoy flares and commercial gun powder; solid rocket propulsion systems for space and strategic applications (including the Trident II Fleet Ballistic Missile solid propulsion system) and composite structures for military and
34
commercial aircraft and spacecraft; tactical weapons systems, air-delivered munitions, battlefield management systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, antitank and demolition systems, fuzes, electronic warfare and test equipment systems, and shoulder-fired weapons systems.
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors provide a comprehensive report on Alliant Techsystems' foreign sales of weapons-related products and services, including offset agreements. The report, prepared at reasonable cost, and omitting proprietary and classified information, should be available to shareholders six months after the annual meeting.
We believe with the American Red Cross that "the greater the availability of arms, the greater the violations of human rights and international humanitarian law."
Therefore, it is reasonable that the report include:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS STATEMENT
IN OPPOSITION TO THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the above stockholder proposal (Proposal No. 3).
Our business includes the development and production of products under contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense. These products are deemed appropriate and necessary for the defense and national security of the United States by the Department of Defense and the U.S. Congress, which authorizes the funds for the acquisition of these products. Products cannot be sold to allies of the United States without the approval of the U.S. government, which requires that we secure an export license prior to the sale. As a result, sale of these products to nations deemed hostile or belligerent by the U.S. government is not permitted. We support these stringent controls on international sales and comply with them.
The above stockholder proposal requests that your Board of Directors provide a comprehensive report on our foreign sales of weapons-related products and services. However, it is apparent from the proposal itselfwhich contains detailed data about our foreign sales and productsthat we already provide extensive information in this regard. We believe that it is not in our best interest, or in your best interest as stockholders, to provide additional detail about our processes, negotiating procedures, and marketing efforts that might benefit our competitors.
Reasonable people may disagree about the advisability of selling specific products to specific foreign countries. However, we believe that our Proxy Statement and Annual Meeting are not proper forums for this debate. Views on this issue are better addressed to the U.S. government, which has determined as a matter of foreign policy that it is in the best interest of the United States to support friendly and allied nations by selling approved military products to those nations.
35
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
We currently expect to hold our 2001 annual meeting on August 7, 2001. Our By-Laws contain specific requirements that must be complied with by stockholders who wish to present proposals or nominate a candidate for election as a director at an annual meeting of stockholders. We call these requirements "advance notice provisions." Some of these requirements are summarized below. If you would like to receive a copy of the provisions of our By-Laws setting forth all of these requirements, you should write to our executive offices, c/o Corporate Secretary.
Stockholder Proposals Intended to be Included in Our Proxy Statement; Voting on Proxy Statement Proposals
If you would like to submit a proposal for us to include in the proxy statement for our 2001 annual meeting, you must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You must also make sure that we receive your proposal at our executive offices (sent c/o Corporate Secretary) by March 2, 2001. Any stockholder proposal included in our proxy statement will also be included on our form of proxy so that stockholders can indicate how they wish to vote their shares on the proposal.
Other Stockholder Proposals; Discretionary Voting on Other Stockholder Proposals
If you would like to present a proposal at our 2001 annual meeting without including it in our proxy statement, you must comply with the advance notice provisions of our By-Laws. These provisions require that we receive your proposal at our executive offices (sent c/o Corporate Secretary) no earlier than April 7, 2001, and no later than May 7, 2001. If we receive an eligible proposal that is not included in our proxy statement, the persons named in our proxy for the 2001 annual meeting will have discretionary authority to vote on the proposal using their best judgment, subject to the provisions of Rule 14a-4(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Stockholder Director Nominations
If you would like to nominate a person for election as a director at our 2001 annual meeting, you must comply with the advance notice provisions of our By-Laws. These provisions require that we receive your nomination at our executive offices (sent c/o Corporate Secretary) no earlier than April 7, 2001, and no later than May 7, 2001.
General Information
If the presiding officer at the 2001 annual meeting determines that a stockholder proposal or stockholder director nomination was not submitted in compliance with the advance notice provisions of our By-Laws, the proposal or nomination will be ruled out of order and not acted upon.
The above information is only a summary of some of the requirements of the advance notice provisions of our By-Laws. If you would like to receive a copy of the provisions of our By-Laws setting forth all of these requirements, you should write to our executive offices, c/o Corporate Secretary.
36
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Our directors and executive officers, and any person who owns more than ten percent of our Common Stock, must file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission indicating the number of shares of our Common Stock (and derivative securities) they beneficially owned when they became directors, executive officers or ten percent stockholders. They must file similar reports indicating any changes in their beneficial ownership of these securities. Copies of these reports must also be provided to us. Based upon our review of these reports and written representations from the persons required to file them, we believe that all required reports were filed during fiscal year 2000.
You may receive, without charge, a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal year 2000 by writing to: Investor Relations, MN11-2047, Alliant Techsystems Inc., 600 Second Street N.E., Hopkins, MN 55343-8384.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Daryl L. Zimmer, Secretary
June 27, 2000
37
APPENDIX A
Proponents of stockholder resolution
Name and Address of Proponent |
Shares |
|
---|---|---|
Academy of Our Lady of Lourdes (a/k/a/ Sisters of the Third Order Regular of Saint Francis) Box 4900 Assisi Heights Rochester, MN 55903 |
35 | |
Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America, Inc (a/k/a/ Maryknoll Fathers and Brothers) P.O. Box 305 Maryknoll, NY 10545-0305 |
|
50 |
Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls, Minnesota 116 Eighth Avenue Southeast Little Falls, MN 56345-3597 |
|
28 |
Franciscan Sisters of Perpetual Adoration 912 Market Street La Crosse, WI 54601-8800 |
|
20 |
School Sisters of Notre Dame, St. Louis Province 320 East Ripa Avenue St. Louis, MO 63125-2897 |
|
40 |
School Sisters of Notre Dame, Baltimore Province 6401 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21212-1099 |
|
100 |
School Sisters of Notre Dame, Mankato Province 170 Good Counsel Drive Mankato, MN 56001 |
|
15 |
School Sisters of Notre Dame Cooperative Investment Fund 336 East Ripa Ave. St. Louis, MO 63125 |
|
52 |
School Sisters of Notre Dame, Northeastern Province 345 Belden Hill Road Wilton, CT 06897 |
|
100 |
School Sisters of Notre Dame, Milwaukee Province 13105 Watertown Plank Road Elm Grove, WI 53122-2291 |
|
100 |
TOTAL OWNERSHIP |
|
540 |
|
|
|
A-1
(Cut off along dotted line)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADMISSION TICKET REQUEST
Alliant Techsystems Inc.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
2:00 p.m., central time, August 1, 2000
600 Second Street N.E.
Hopkins (suburban Minneapolis), Minnesota
If you plan to attend the 2000 Annual Meeting, you may request an admission ticket for yourself and members of your immediate family by:
Admission tickets will be mailed in response to requests received by July 24, 2000. All other admission tickets may be picked up at the Annual Meeting.
Your Name (Please Print): | ||
Address: |
|
|
(Street) | ||
(City, State, Zip Code) |
Additional admission tickets requested for the following immediate family members:
You may return this form with your proxy card in the envelope provided; but it is recommended (particularly if your shares are held by your broker in "street name") that you mail it directly to:
Alliant Techsystems Inc.
MN11-2214
600 Second Street N.E.
Hopkins, MN 55343-8384
(Signature of Stockholder) |
|