<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
----------------------------------
FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996
OR
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period -------------- to --------------
Commission file number: 1-10596
ESCO Electronics Corporation
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
Missouri 43-1554045
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
8888 Ladue Road, Ste. 200
St. Louis, Missouri 63124-2090
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE:
(314) 213-7200
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Name of Each
Exchange on
Title of Each Class Which Registered
------------------- ----------------
Common Stock Trust Receipts New York Stock
Exchange, Inc.
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per New York Stock
share Exchange, Inc.
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights New York Stock
Exchange, Inc.
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
----- -----
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form l0-K or any
amendment to this Form l0-K. [X]
Aggregate market value of the Common Stock Trust Receipts held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of close of business on December 11,
1996: $111,750,522<F*>.
[FN]
<F*> For purpose of this calculation only, without determining whether
the following are affiliates of the registrant, the registrant has
assumed that (i) its directors and executive officers are
affiliates, and (ii) no party who has filed a Schedule 13D or 13G
is an affiliate.
Number of Common Stock Trust Receipts outstanding at December 11, 1996:
11,799,171 Receipts.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
1. Portions of the registrant's Annual Report to Stockholders for fiscal
year ended September 30, 1996 (the "1996 Annual Report") (Part II)
2. Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement dated December 6, 1996
(Part III).
<PAGE> 2
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A is being filed as an
amendment to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 1996, for the purpose of
amending Items 6, 7 and 8 of Part II, and Item 14 of Part IV thereof in their
entirety as set forth herein. References in the registrant's Form 10-K to
"Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 1996 Annual Report" are to
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K/A.
<TABLE>
ESCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
INDEX TO AMENDMENT NO 1 TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K/A
<CAPTION>
Item Description Page
- ---- ----------- ----
<S> <C>
Part II
6. Selected Financial Data. xx
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations. xx
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. xx
Part IV
14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K. xx
SIGNATURES xx
INDEX TO EXHIBITS xx
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included
herein.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
<F1> <F2> <F3>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FOR YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30:
Net sales $438.5 441.0 473.9 459.7 406.3
Interest expense 4.8 5.5 3.6 2.5 1.3
Earnings (loss) before income taxes 14.8 (29.5) 12.7 6.4 2.0
Net earnings (loss) 26.1 (30.3) 8.3 5.2 1.4
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary 2.26 (2.76) .72 .47 .12
Fully diluted 2.25 (2.76) .72 .46 .12
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30:
Working capital 86.2 71.4 86.6 76.8 100.5
Total assets 307.8 378.0 347.5 335.3 541.7
Long-term debt 11.4 23.5 25.1 8.1 8.1
Shareholders' equity 191.1 182.3 187.4 174.1 390.9
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
<F1>Includes the sale of Hazeltine; $25.3 million of other charges related to cost
of sales; and includes an adjustment to the income tax valuation reserve (See
Notes 2, 6 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)
<F2>Includes $16.5 million of other charges related to cost of sales and a change
in accounting estimate (See Notes 1(e) and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements).
<F3>Includes impact of Corporate Readjustment (See Note 1(b)).
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 4
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
..............
Business
Environment
..............
ESCO Electronics Corporation (ESCO, the Company) primarily operates
within the increasingly competitive defense industry. As the overall defense
industrial base continues its rapid consolidation, ESCO has responded to this
competitive challenge by continuing to reposition itself to compete in the
global marketplace and to apply defense technologies to commercial products.
Management believes the Company's strong product diversification and
technology niches in its core defense businesses will enable it to compete
effectively in these shrinking defense markets.
During 1996, management implemented one of the key elements of its
strategy to create shareholder value -- the sale of Hazeltine Corporation
(Hazeltine). On July 22, 1996, the Company completed the sale of its
Hazeltine subsidiary to GEC-Marconi Electronic Systems Corporation (GEC). The
Company sold 100% of the common stock of Hazeltine for $110 million in cash.
The sale of Hazeltine enabled the Company to further strengthen its overall
financial position and to return a significant amount of the proceeds to
shareholders.
Also during 1996, management continued to increase its investment in
commercial opportunities by selectively applying the Company's proven defense
technologies and capabilities to non-military applications. This success was
evidenced by the 43% increase in commercial sales in 1996 compared to 1995.
During 1995, the Company enhanced its competitive repositioning by
implementing a facilities consolidation program which reduced the Company's
operating facilities' square footage by approximately 30%.
Overall, 1996 was a challenging, yet rewarding year for ESCO. Mature
defense programs which were completed in the prior year were replaced by new
defense programs and new commercial opportunities. These new program
opportunities, in conjunction with the sale of Hazeltine, effectively
repositioned the Company's business base for the remainder of the decade.
This should allow ESCO to increase its commercial segment contribution while
continuing to reduce its overall dependence on its defense business.
ESCO's improved financial position and strong balance sheet at
September 30, 1996 should allow the Company to continue its strategy of
deliberate diversification through internal product development and
acquisitions, thereby increasing shareholder value.
..............
Results of
Operations
..............
1996 Compared with 1995
Net sales of $438.5 million in 1996 were $2.5 million (0.6%) lower than
net sales of $441 million in 1995. The decrease was primarily the result of
the sale of Hazeltine in July 1996. Hazeltine's sales for the ten-month
period of 1996 prior to its divestiture were $20.4 million lower than its
full year's sales in 1995. Net sales at the remainder of the Company's
operating units increased $17.9 million in 1996 compared to 1995 due to
increased sales volume at Systems & Electronics Inc. (SEI) and PTI
Technologies Inc. (PTI). In 1996, defense sales were $301 million and
commercial sales were $137.5 million compared with 1995 defense and
commercial sales of $345.1 million and $95.9 million, respectively.
Hazeltine's commercial sales were not significant in either period presented.
The increase in 1996 commercial sales reflects additional volume primarily at
SEI, PTI and EMC Test Systems. Management expects the Company's commercial
sales content as a percent of total sales will continue to increase in 1997.
<PAGE> 5
The Company is involved in the design, development and manufacture of
products for the defense and commercial markets. The Company generally
manufactures products only upon receipt of firm customer orders and delivers
the products in accordance with the customer's schedule. As a result, the
Company's beginning backlog of firm orders, the level of orders received
during the year and the mix of products to be produced all influence the
Company's operating results.
The September 30, 1995 backlog of $530.9 million as previously reported
included $236.3 million related to Hazeltine. Firm order backlog was $246.7
million at September 30, 1996, compared to $294.6 million as adjusted to
remove Hazeltine's backlog at September 30, 1995. The decrease in backlog as
adjusted reflects the timing of receipt of orders and related sales
throughout the various programs' life cycles, principally at SEI.
Orders aggregating $373.6 million were received in 1996, compared with
$436.2 million in 1995. Orders received by Hazeltine prior to its sale were
$77.4 million and $160.1 million in 1996 and 1995, respectively. Adjusted to
remove Hazeltine from both periods, comparative orders for 1996 and 1995 were
$296.2 million and $276.1 million, respectively, reflecting a $20.1 million
(7.3%) increase. The largest increases in orders were recorded at PTI and EMC
Test Systems. The most significant orders in 1996 were for filtration/fluid
flow products; aircraft cargo loaders; EMC test equipment; M1000 tank
transporters; integrated mail handling and sorting systems; and airborne
radar systems.
The Company computes gross profit as: net sales, less cost of sales,
less other charges related to cost of sales. The gross profit margin is the
gross profit divided into net sales expressed as a percentage.
The gross profit margin in 1996 was 10.6% compared to 18.1% in 1995.
The decrease in 1996 was primarily attributable to two factors: a $23
million adjustment of the estimate of the costs to complete the 60K Loader
program at SEI; and the components of other charges related to cost of sales
as discussed below. The 1996 gross profit margin, excluding the 60K Loader
adjustment and the other charges related to cost of sales would have been
21.6%, compared to the 1995 gross margin percentage of 21.8%, excluding the
1995 other charges related to cost of sales. The gross profit percentage
attributable to the commercial segment increased slightly in 1996 compared to
1995 due to a favorable product sales mix.
During 1996, and in connection with the sale of Hazeltine and
management's decision to pursue a strategy of deliberate diversification from
defense to commercial, the Company reevaluated the carrying value of certain
assets. As a result of this reevaluation, the Company recorded $25.3 million
of other charges related to cost of sales in 1996. These strategic decisions
were intended to increase the contributions of the commercial segment and to
reduce the Company's overall dependence on the defense businesses.
The 1996 charge includes $14.3 million of inventories related to defense
programs which management no longer intends to actively pursue; $6
million of costs included in other assets incurred in anticipation of
certain defense contract awards (Precontract Costs) which the Company no
longer intends to actively pursue; and a $5 million adjustment in the
Company's estimate of recoveries in a contract dispute related to the
M1000 tank transporter program.
The 1996 write-down of $14.3 million in inventories and $6 million of
Precontract Costs was the result of management's decision to refocus its
marketing efforts to products which could yield more immediate results. The
inventories related to mature armament products which, in earlier years, were
manufactured and sold in large quantities. Although this inventory had been in
limited production in recent years, until 1996 these items were considered to
have sufficient annual proposals outstanding to support potential future sales
<PAGE> 6
activity. No significant sales revenue was recognized in the periods
presented. The 1996 write-off of $6 million of Precontract Costs related to a
specific armament contract with the U.S. Navy. The Company incurred costs to
build a prototype to satisfy the customer requirements. After repeated delays
and modifications by the customer, the Company, as part of its shift in
strategic direction, determined that further pursuit of this contract would
not be cost beneficial. The $5 million adjustment related to the M1000
contract dispute was the result of the Company receiving information in 1996
which indicated the carrying value of certain M1000 claim costs may not be
fully recoverable.
Other charges related to cost of sales of $16.5 million incurred during
1995 were related to the facilities consolidation program implemented in 1995.
The 1995 charges include an $8.6 million pretax charge for a non-cash
write-off related to the accounting for the lease on the 8100 West Florissant,
St. Louis, Missouri (8100 Building) facilities which were vacated, and a $7.9
million non-cash pretax charge associated with the disposition of safety stock
inventories resulting from the facilities consolidation program and related
restructuring of the Company's West Coast operations.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 1996 were $70.5
million, or 16.1% of net sales, compared with $74.2 million, or 16.8% of net
sales, for 1995. The decrease in 1996 is the result of successful cost
containment programs throughout the Company and the sale of Hazeltine.
Interest expense decreased to $4.8 million in 1996 from $5.5 million in
1995, primarily as a result of lower average outstanding borrowings and lower
weighted average interest rates throughout 1996 compared to 1995. A
significant amount of the outstanding borrowings were repaid in July 1996 with
a portion of the proceeds from the sale of Hazeltine.
Other costs and expenses, net, decreased in 1996 to $5 million from
$29.5 million in 1995. The decrease is primarily due to the absence in
1996 of approximately $16.1 million in amortization of a contract
guarantee fee previously paid to Emerson Electric Co.(Emerson) in
connection with the spin-off of ESCO in 1990, and the absence of the
$7.8 million charge for exit and relocation charges incurred in
connection with the abandonment of the 8100 Building. The 1995
guarantee fee amortization of $16.1 million includes an $11.1 million
non-cash charge for the Company's 1995 change in accounting estimate
(see Note 1 (e)) related to the Emerson guarantee fee, and approximately
$5 million of normal amortization.
The gain on the sale of Hazeltine represents the net gain after
deducting selling costs and expenses and after deducting for certain
assets and liabilities retained by ESCO.
Based on the Company's historical pretax income and losses, adjusted for
significant items such as the facilities consolidation program, the
change in accounting estimates and other costs related to cost of sales,
together with management's projection of future taxable income based
upon its shift in strategic direction, management believes it is more
likely than not that the Company will realize a majority of the benefits
of the net deferred tax asset existing at September 30, 1996. In order
to realize the aforementioned net deferred tax asset, excluding the
capital loss carryforward, the Company will need to generate future
taxable income of approximately $189 million, a significant portion of
which is required to be realized prior to the expiration of the net
operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, for which a a significant portion
expires in 2006 and the remainder thereafter. As a result of the sale of
Hazeltine, the Company has generated a capital loss for tax purposes of
approximately $87 million. This capital loss may be applied for a
limited period towards future capital gains recognized by the Company,
at which time the Company may realize additional tax benefits. Any
unused capital loss carryforward will expire in 2001.
<PAGE> 7
The Company had previously reduced its deferred tax valuation allowance
systematically by utilizing projected taxable income over a specified future
period of time. Management currently believes, considering the aforementioned
items, the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to absorb all net
operating loss carryforwards and deductible temporary differences prior to
expiration of the NOLs, and accordingly, in 1996 reduced its deferred tax
valuation allowance by $15.8 million. The remaining portion of the 1995
deferred tax valuation allowance of approximately $12.7 million represents
management's best estimate of the portion of the deferred tax asset associated
with temporary differences and NOLs which may not be realized. Due to the 1993
Corporate Readjustment, $15.1 million of this reduction was credited directly
to additional paid-in capital. The remaining $.7 million was credited directly
to the tax provision. The Company has maintained a full valuation reserve in
the amount of $30.6 million for the portion of the deferred tax asset
represented by the capital loss. There can be no assurance, however, that the
Company will generate sufficient taxable income or a specified level of
continuing taxable income in order to fully utilize the deferred tax assets in
the future.
Income tax expense for 1995 reflects foreign, state and local taxes, net
of a $.4 million benefit recognized in 1995.
The effective tax rate in 1996 was (77%) compared with (2.6%) in 1995.
The 1996 effective tax rate was favorably impacted by the divestiture of
Hazeltine. The tax provisions for both periods presented are impacted by the
Corporate Readjustment implemented in 1993. The income tax benefit recognized
in 1995 of $25.2 million was accounted for as a credit to additional paid-in
capital.
In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 (SFAS 121), "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of."
SFAS 121 requires recognition of an impairment loss for long-lived assets if
the sum of the entity's expected future undiscounted cash flow is less than
the carrying amount of the respective assets. The Company will adopt the
provisions of SFAS 121 in 1997. The effect on 1997 results of operations is
not expected to be material.
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS 123, which is effective beginning in 1997,
establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based
employee compensation plans. The Company will comply with SFAS 123 in 1997.
The Company is currently evaluating which alternatives available within the
Standard will be adopted.
1995 Compared with 1994
Net sales of $441 million in 1995 were $32.9 million (6.9%) lower than
net sales of $473.9 million in 1994. The decrease was primarily the result of
the completion of mature defense programs in 1994 at SEI and Hazeltine, which
were partially replaced by new defense programs entering production and new
commercial products. In 1995, defense sales were $345.1 million and
commercial sales were $95.9 million compared with 1994 defense and commercial
sales of $387.2 million and $86.7 million, respectively. The increase in
1995 commercial sales reflects additional volume primarily at PTI and SEI.
Firm order backlog was $530.9 million at September 30, 1995, a $4.8
million (.9%) decrease from the $535.7 million backlog at September 30, 1994.
Orders aggregating $436.2 million were received in 1995, compared with $418.7
million in 1994. The most significant orders in 1995 were for electronic
identification systems; aircraft cargo loaders; anti-missile system canisters
and the related M860 trailers; high power device testers; TOW missile
systems; and fire support systems used on the Bradley Fire Support Team
vehicle.
<PAGE> 8
The Company computes gross profit as net sales, less cost of sales, less
other charges related to cost of sales. The gross profit margin is the gross
profit divided into net sales expressed as a percentage.
The gross profit margin in 1995 decreased to 18.1% from 21.2% in 1994,
primarily due to other charges related to cost of sales. The 1995 gross
margin percentage, excluding other charges related to cost of sales, would
have been 21.8%. The 1994 gross profit was negatively impacted by the revised
estimate of the costs to complete the M1000 tank transporter program at SEI.
The gross profit percentages attributable to the defense and commercial
segments remained consistent within the comparable periods presented.
Other charges related to cost of sales of $16.5 million incurred during
1995 were related to the facilities consolidation program implemented in 1995.
The 1995 charges include an $8.6 million pretax charge for a non-cash
write-off related to the accounting for the lease on the 8100 Building which
was vacated, and a $7.9 million non-cash pretax charge associated with the
disposition of safety stock inventories resulting from the consolidation
program and related restructuring of the Company's West Coast operations.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 1995 were $74.2
million, or 16.8% of net sales, compared with $76 million, or 16% of net
sales, for 1994. The decrease in 1995 spending was the result of successful
cost containment programs throughout the Company. The increase in 1995
percentage of sales was primarily due to additional investment in start-up
commercial programs throughout the Company.
Interest expense increased to $5.5 million in 1995 from $3.6 million in
1994, primarily as a result of the additional short-term borrowings
outstanding throughout 1995 needed to fund current working capital
requirements and higher market interest rates throughout 1995.
Other costs and expenses, net, increased in 1995 to $29.5 million from
$8 million in 1994, primarily due to $16.1 million in amortization of a
contract guarantee fee previously paid to Emerson in connection with the
spin-off of ESCO in 1990, and a $7.8 million charge for exit and
relocation charges incurred in connection with the abandonment of the
8100 Building. The 1995 guarantee fee amortization of $16.1 million
includes an $11.1 million non-cash charge for the Company's 1995 change
in accounting estimate (see Note 1 (e)) related to the Emerson guarantee
fee, and approximately $5 million of normal amortization. Management
changed its accounting estimate in 1995 based upon a formal review of
the guaranteed contracts and the expected future revenue streams to be
generated from the respective contracts. Based upon this review,
Management changed its method of accounting from amortizing the
guarantee fee over the expected duration of the contracts (straight-line
basis) to amortizing it based on the related guaranteed contract
revenues generated to date and the expected future revenues. Other costs
and expenses, net, in 1994 included approximately $5 million in
amortization of a contract guarantee fee paid to Emerson.
Income tax expense for 1995 reflects foreign, state and local taxes, net
of a $.4 million benefit recognized in 1995.
The effective tax rate in 1995 was (2.6%) compared with 34.4% in 1994.
The tax provisions for both periods presented are impacted by the Corporate
Readjustment implemented in 1993. The income tax benefits recognized in 1995
and 1994 of $25.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively, were accounted for
as credits to additional paid-in capital.
<PAGE> 9
..............
Capital
Resources
and Liquidity
..............
The Company has been, and will continue to be, impacted by changes in
the defense industry brought about by the changing international political
environment and the U.S. Government's deficit reduction measures, including
procurement policies and tax reform. This operating environment requires
defense contractors to make significant capital commitments to programs for
extended periods of time. The Company has been concentrating on shifting its
business from development programs to production programs and on increasing
the commercial content of its business base, resulting in lower working
capital requirements and thereby reducing the risk inherent in the defense
industry.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 1996 was $1.0 million
compared to net cash used by operating activities of $8.1 million in 1995.
The 1996 net cash provided by operating activities improved compared to 1995
primarily due to lower investment in working capital in 1996. The 1996 net
cash provided by operating activities was favorably impacted by positive cash
generation from inventories versus the 1995 cash investment required for
inventories. This 1996 cash generation from inventories was partially offset
by the liquidation of advance payments on long-term contracts received in
1995.
Net cash used by operating activities was $8.1 million in 1995,
compared to $11.4 million in 1994. The 1995 net cash used by operating
activities was significantly impacted by the $6.6 million cash requirement
necessary to fund operating working capital, primarily at SEI. The 1995
operating working capital requirements were impacted by: an increase of $29
million in costs and estimated earnings on long-term contracts and
inventories primarily to satisfy near-term production and delivery
requirements; partially offset by a $9.2 million increase in advance payments
received on long-term contracts.
The 1994 operating working capital requirements were adversely affected
by: an increase in accounts receivable, primarily due to the timing and
volume of deliveries and cash receipts; and reductions in accounts payable,
advance payments on long-term contracts and accrued expenses resulting from
payments necessary to satisfy outstanding commitments throughout 1994.
In 1996, capital expenditures of $8.6 million included capitalized
facility costs at SEI resulting from the 1995 facilities consolidation
program, and process equipment at PTI. The 1996 capital expenditures included
$1.5 million related to Hazeltine. In 1995, capital expenditures of $11.1
million included capitalized facility costs and production test equipment at
SEI and facility restoration costs at Rantec resulting from the 1994
California earthquake. In 1994, the most significant expenditures included
process equipment at PTI, facility restoration costs at Rantec and production
test equipment at Hazeltine. There were no commitments outstanding that were
considered material for capital expenditures at September 30, 1996.
At September 30, 1996, the Company had available net operating loss
carryforwards (NOLs) for tax purposes of approximately $120 million. These
NOLs will expire beginning in year 2006 and ending in year 2010. These NOLs
will be used to reduce future Federal income tax cash payments.
On December 29, 1994, the Company purchased the assets of Ray Proof
North America, a division of Shielding Systems Corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Bairnco Corporation, for approximately $1.6 million. Ray Proof
was primarily involved in the development, production, installation and test
of anechoic absorber material and shielding room materials.
<PAGE> 10
On December 1, 1993, the Company acquired Schumacher Filters, Ltd.
(renamed PTI Technologies Limited) for approximately $7.6 million.
In conjunction with the sale of Hazeltine in July 1996, the Company
amended its bank credit facility. The Company maintained its $80 million
revolving credit facility (subject to borrowing base asset limitations),
repaid all outstanding short-term borrowings and paid down the bank term loan
to $13 million. The $13 million term loan has scheduled amortization payments
of $325,000 per quarter commencing in the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
The maturity of the bank credit facility is September 30, 1998. The amended
bank agreement also allowed the Company to use a portion of the Hazeltine
sales proceeds to pay a special cash distribution to shareholders in 1996 and
to repurchase a significant amount of outstanding ESCO common shares in the
open market. The revolving credit facility is available for direct borrowings
and/or the issuance of letters of credit. These credit facilities are
provided by a group of banks, led by Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New
York. At September 30, 1996, the Company had $64.2 million available under
this revolving credit facility. The $8 million subordinated term loan was
repaid in 1996.
In 1996, the Company authorized an open market share repurchase program
for up to two million shares of common stock over a period ending September
30, 1998. No shares were repurchased in 1996.
Cash flow from operations and borrowings under the bank credit facility
are expected to provide adequate resources to meet the Company's capital
requirements and operational needs for the foreseeable future.
During 1995, Textron, Inc. returned and the Company has cancelled the
500,000 warrants previously issued in connection with the September 30, 1992
acquisition of PTI.
Management believes that, for the periods presented, inflation has not
had a material effect on the Company's operations.
The Company is currently involved in various stages of investigation,
remediation and litigation relating to environmental matters. Based on
current information available, management does not believe the aggregate
costs involved in the resolution of these matters will have a material
adverse effect on the Company's operating results, capital expenditures or
competitive position.
..............
Forward-
Looking
Information
..............
The statements contained in this Management's Discussion and Analysis
concerning the Company's future revenues, profitability, financial resources,
product mix, market demand and product development are forward-looking
statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's actual results in the
future may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements due to risks and uncertainties that exist in the Company's
operations and business environment including, but not limited to: changing
priorities or reductions in the U.S. and worldwide defense budgets;
termination of government contracts due to unilateral government action or the
Company's failure to perform; delivery delays or defaults by customers;
performance issues with key suppliers and subcontractors; the Company's
successful execution of internal operating plans; and collective bargaining
labor disputes.
<PAGE> 11
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
<TABLE>
ESCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
<CAPTION>
Years ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts 1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $438,543 441,023 473,855
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 366,719 344,781 373,580
Other charges related to cost of sales 25,300 16,522 --
Selling, general and administrative expenses 70,464 74,162 75,989
Interest expense 4,781 5,549 3,646
Other, net 5,017 29,514 7,984
Gain on sale of Hazeltine (48,500) -- --
-------- ------- -------
Total costs and expenses 423,781 470,528 461,199
-------- ------- -------
Earnings (loss) before income tax 14,762 (29,505) 12,656
Income tax expense (benefit) (11,374) 755 4,348
-------- ------- -------
Net earnings (loss) $ 26,136 (30,260) 8,308
-------- ------- -------
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary $ 2.26 (2.76) .72
Fully diluted $ 2.25 (2.76) .72
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 12
<TABLE>
ESCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<CAPTION>
Years ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 22,209 320
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $273 and $242
in 1996 and 1995, respectively 34,664 48,224
Costs and estimated earnings on long-term contracts, less progress
billings of $70,671 and $72,194 in 1996 and 1995, respectively 51,585 51,923
Inventories 51,187 107,421
Other current assets 3,005 3,975
-------- -------
Total current assets 162,650 211,863
-------- -------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Land and land improvements 6,586 14,996
Buildings and leasehold improvements 27,974 46,597
Machinery and equipment 40,748 47,333
Construction in progress 5,043 7,300
-------- -------
80,351 116,226
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 26,325 24,747
-------- -------
Net property, plant and equipment 54,026 91,479
Excess of cost over net assets of purchased businesses, less accumulated
amortization of $1,597 and $1,051 in 1996 and 1995, respectively 20,395 20,490
Deferred tax asset 53,326 25,637
Other assets 17,435 28,532
-------- -------
$307,832 378,001
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 13
<TABLE>
ESCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<CAPTION>
Years ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt $ 1,300 39,000
Accounts payable 40,057 42,327
Advance payments on long-term contracts, less costs incurred
of $5,478 and $2,816 in 1996 and 1995, respectively 8,336 19,617
Accrued expenses 26,771 39,510
-------- -------
Total current liabilities 76,464 140,454
-------- -------
Other liabilities 28,860 31,840
Long-term debt 11,375 23,452
-------- -------
Total liabilities 116,699 195,746
-------- -------
Commitments and contingencies -- --
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 10,000,000 shares -- --
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 50,000,000 shares;
issued 12,415,346 and 11,574,420 shares in 1996 and 1995, respectively 124 116
Additional paid-in capital 192,967 210,205
Retained earnings (deficit) since elimination of deficit of $60,798 at
September 30, 1993 4,184 (21,952)
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments 107 292
Minimum pension liability (1,869) (1,998)
-------- -------
195,513 186,663
Less treasury stock, at cost (566,622 and 570,472 common shares in 1996
and 1995, respectively) (4,380) (4,408)
-------- -------
Total shareholders' equity 191,133 182,255
-------- -------
$307,832 378,001
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 14
<TABLE>
ESCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<CAPTION>
Cumulative
Foreign
Common Stock Additional Retained Currency Minimum
-------------------- Paid-in Earnings Translation Pension Treasury
Years ended September 30, (In thousands) Shares Amount Capital (Deficit) Adjustments Liability Stock
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, September 30, 1993 11,387 $114 177,789 -- (161) -- (3,643)
Exercise of stock options 133 1 1,657 -- -- -- --
Net earnings -- -- -- 8,308 -- -- --
Effect of Corporate Readjustment
on taxes -- -- 4,177 -- -- -- --
Purchases into treasury -- -- -- -- -- -- (795)
Translation adjustments -- -- -- -- (34) -- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, September 30, 1994 11,520 115 183,623 8,308 (195) -- (4,438)
Exercise of stock options 54 1 1,343 -- -- -- 30
Net loss -- -- -- (30,260) -- -- --
Effect of Corporate Readjustment
on taxes -- -- 25,239 -- -- -- --
Translation adjustments -- -- -- -- 487 -- --
Minimum pension liability -- -- -- -- -- (1,998) --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, September 30, 1995 11,574 116 210,205 (21,952) 292 (1,998) (4,408)
Exercise of stock options 841 8 3,214 -- -- -- 28
Net earnings -- -- -- 26,136 -- -- --
Effect of Corporate Readjustment
on taxes -- -- 15,094 -- -- -- --
Cash distribution ($3.00 per share) -- -- (35,546) -- -- -- --
Translation adjustments -- -- -- -- (185) -- --
Minimum pension liability -- -- -- -- -- 129 --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, September 30, 1996 12,415 $124 192,967 4,184 107 (1,869) (4,380)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 15
<TABLE>
ESCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
<CAPTION>
Years ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss) $ 26,136 (30,260) 8,308
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 13,486 14,042 13,652
Changes in operating working capital 5,852 (6,602) (20,668)
Write-off of certain assets 25,300 19,744 --
Gain on sale of Hazeltine (48,500) -- --
Effect of deferred taxes on tax provision (12,598) (448) 4,177
Other (8,698) (4,595) (16,894)
-------- ------- ------
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 978 (8,119) (11,425)
-------- ------- ------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures (8,558) (11,146) (10,131)
Divestiture / (acquisition) of businesses 110,000 (1,596) (7,648)
-------- ------- ------
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 101,442 (12,742) (17,779)
-------- ------- ------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt -- 4,490 --
Principal payments on long-term debt (15,386) (2,217) (1,046)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings (33,000) 15,500 22,500
Special cash distribution / purchases of common stock into treasury (35,546) -- (795)
Other 3,401 752 695
-------- ------- ------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (80,531) 18,525 21,354
-------- ------- ------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 21,889 (2,336) (7,850)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 320 2,656 10,506
-------- ------- ------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 22,209 320 2,656
-------- ------- ------
Changes in operating working capital:
Accounts receivable, net $ 5,487 1,191 (14,255)
Costs and estimated earnings on long-term contracts, net (14,382) (7,140) 5,310
Inventories 20,730 (21,820) 5,272
Other current assets (15) 2,625 (4,258)
Accounts payable 133 8,408 (8,623)
Advance payments on long-term contracts, net (7,183) 9,180 (2,350)
Accrued expenses 1,082 954 (1,764)
-------- ------- ------
$ 5,852 (6,602) (20,668)
-------- ------- ------
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid to third parties $ 4,765 5,495 3,411
Income taxes paid 673 972 1,143
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 16
.............................................
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
.............................................
(a) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ESCO
Electronics Corporation (ESCO) and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the
Company). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been
eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform with the 1996 presentation.
(b) Basis of Presentation
Effective September 30, 1990, Emerson Electric Co. (Emerson)
transferred the stock of certain of its subsidiaries, primarily related to
its government and defense business, to ESCO and distributed all of the
issued and outstanding ESCO common stock to Emerson shareholders (the
spin-off). Effective September 30, 1993, the Company implemented an
accounting readjustment in accordance with the accounting provisions
applicable to a "quasi-reorganization" which restated assets and liabilities
to fair values and eliminated the deficit in retained earnings.
Fair values of the Company's financial instruments are estimated by
reference to quoted prices from market sources and financial institutions, as
well as other valuation techniques. The estimated fair value of each class of
financial instruments approximated the related carrying value at September
30, 1996 and 1995.
(c) Nature of Operations
The Company is engaged in the research, development, manufacture, sale
and support of a wide variety of defense and commercial systems and products.
Defense items principally are supplied to the United States Government under
prime contracts from the Army, Navy and Air Force and under subcontracts with
their prime contractors, and are also sold to foreign customers. Commercial
items are supplied to a variety of customers worldwide.
The Company operates in two principal industry segments: defense and
commercial. The Company's main products include defense electronics, defense
systems, filtration/fluid flow, communications/test and other industrial and
government products.
(d) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(e) Change in Accounting -- 1995
Emerson guaranteed the performance of most of the Company's contracts
which existed at the spin-off. In consideration of these performance
guarantees, the Company paid Emerson a guarantee fee of $7.4 million per year
during the five-year period ended September 30, 1995.
During 1995, management reviewed the accounting for these performance
guarantees and determined the period and method of amortizing the guarantee
fee should take into consideration the expected future revenue stream from
the respective guaranteed contracts. Accordingly, management changed its
method of accounting from amortizing the guarantee fee over the expected
duration of the guaranteed contracts (estimated benefit period of seven
years) on a straight-line basis to amortizing it based upon the related
guaranteed contract revenues generated to date and the expected future
revenues.
<PAGE> 17
This change in accounting principle, which is inseparable from a change
in accounting estimate, was retroactively implemented effective October 1,
1994, which represents the beginning of the Company's fiscal year 1995. This
change resulted in an $11.1 million non-cash pretax charge, which is included
in Other, net in the 1995 results of operations.
(f) Revenue Recognition
Revenue on production contracts is recorded when specific contract
terms are fulfilled, usually by delivery or acceptance (the units of delivery
method of accounting). The costs attributed to units delivered are based on
the estimated average costs of all units expected to be produced in a
contract or group of contracts. Revenue under long-term contracts for which
units of delivery is an inappropriate measurement of performance is
recognized on the percentage-of-completion method based upon incurred costs
compared to total estimated costs under the contract. Revenue under
engineering contracts is generally recognized as milestones are attained.
Revenues from cost reimbursement contracts are recorded as costs are
incurred, plus fees earned. Estimated amounts for contract changes and claims
are included in contract revenues only when realization is probable.
Revisions to assumptions and estimates, primarily in contract value and
estimated costs used for recording sales and earnings, are reflected in the
accounting period in which the facts become known. Losses recognized on
contracts include a provision for the future selling, general and
administrative costs applicable to the respective contracts.
Revenue is recognized on commercial sales when products are shipped or
when services are performed.
(g) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents include temporary investments that are readily
convertible into cash, such as certificates of deposit, commercial paper and
treasury bills with original maturities of three months or less.
(h) Costs and Estimated Earnings on Long-Term Contracts
Costs and estimated earnings on long-term contracts represent unbilled
revenues, including accrued profits on long-term contracts accounted for
under the percentage-of-completion method, net of progress billings.
(i) Inventories
Inventories under long-term contracts reflect accumulated production
costs, factory overhead, initial tooling and other related costs less the
portion of such costs charged to cost of sales and any progress payments
received. In accordance with industry practice, costs incurred on contracts
in progress include amounts relating to programs having production cycles
longer than one year, and a portion thereof will not be realized within one
year.
Other inventories are carried at the lower of cost (first-in,
first-out) or market.
(j) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost when purchased.
Depreciation and amortization are computed on accelerated methods over the
estimated useful lives of the assets: buildings, 10-40 years; machinery and
equipment, 5-10 years; and office furniture and equipment, 5-10 years.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the remaining term of the
applicable lease or their estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter. The
Company assesses the recoverability of property, plant and equipment by
determining whether the depreciation and amortization of the asset balance
over its remaining life can be recovered through undiscounted future
operating cash flows.
<PAGE> 18
(k) Excess of Cost Over Net Assets of Purchased Businesses
Assets and liabilities related to business combinations accounted for
as purchase transactions are recorded at their respective fair values. Excess
of cost over the fair value of net assets purchased (goodwill) is amortized
on a straight-line basis over the periods estimated to be benefited, not
exceeding 40 years. The Company assesses the recoverability of this
intangible asset by determining whether the amortization of the asset balance
over its remaining life can be recovered through undiscounted future
operating cash flows.
(l) Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
(m) Research and Development Costs
Company-sponsored research and development costs include research and
development and bid and proposal efforts related to U.S. Government and
commercial products and services. Company-sponsored product development costs
are charged to expense when incurred. Customer-sponsored research and
development costs incurred pursuant to contracts are accounted for similar to
other program costs.
(n) Foreign Currency Translation
The financial statements of the Company's foreign operations are
translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 52 (SFAS 52), "Foreign Currency Translation." The
resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of
shareholders' equity.
(o) Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding plus shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of
dilutive common share options, performance shares and warrants by using the
treasury stock method. For 1996, earnings per share is computed using
11,579,840 and 11,638,408 common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding for primary and fully diluted, respectively. For 1995, loss per
share is computed using 10,973,315 common shares outstanding. For 1994,
primary and fully diluted earnings per share are computed using 11,565,334
common shares and common share equivalents outstanding.
<PAGE> 19
........................................
2. Acquisitions/Divestitures (Unaudited)
........................................
On July 22, 1996, the Company completed the sale of its Hazeltine
subsidiary to GEC-Marconi Electronic Systems Corporation (GEC). The Company
sold 100% of the common stock of Hazeltine for $110 million in cash,
resulting in a $48.5 million gain. Certain assets and liabilities of
Hazeltine were retained by the Company.
The key financial statement accounts of Hazeltine which are included in
the audited consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 1995 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <S> <C>
Assets Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Accounts receivable, net $ 8,073 Current liabilities $24,070
Costs and estimated earnings
on long-term contracts 9,720 Other liabilities 1,181
Inventories 21,204 Long-term debt 1,452
Net property, plant and equipment 34,046 Shareholders' equity 50,164
Other (current and noncurrent) 3,824 -------
-------
Total $76,867 Total $76,867
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Included in the 1996 and 1995 consolidated statements of operations are
the operating results of Hazeltine prior to its divestiture as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $93,987 114,196
Cost of sales 75,598 96,833
Selling, general and administrative expenses 12,859 14,198
Other costs and expenses, net 941 1,650
------- -------
Earnings before income taxes $ 4,589 1,515
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
On December 29, 1994, the Company purchased the assets of Ray Proof
North America, a division of Shielding Systems Corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Bairnco Corporation for approximately $1.6 million. Ray Proof
was primarily involved in the development, production, installation and test
of anechoic absorber material and shielding room material.
On December 1, 1993, the Company acquired all outstanding stock of
Schumacher Filters, Ltd. from Kraftanlagen, AG for approximately $7.6
million, and renamed the entity PTI Technologies Limited (PTI Ltd.). PTI Ltd.
manufactures a variety of pleated, precision wound, and activated carbon
filter cartridges for applications in the petrochemical, pharmaceutical, food
and beverage and electronics industries.
These acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting.
<PAGE> 20
......................
3. Accounts Receivable
......................
Accounts receivable consist of the following at September 30, 1996 and
1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
U.S. Government and prime contractors $ 9,459 15,169
Commercial 17,596 23,459
Other 7,609 9,596
------- ------
Total $34,664 48,224
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
..............
4. Inventories
..............
Inventories consist of the following at September 30, 1996 and 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Finished goods $ 5,927 4,442
Work in process - including long-term contracts 32,071 92,559
Raw materials 13,189 10,420
------- -------
Total $51,187 107,421
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Under the contractual arrangements by which progress payments are
received, the U.S. Government has a security interest in the inventories
associated with specific contracts. Inventories are net of progress payment
receipts of $1.2 million and $8.5 million at September 30, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
The $25.3 million of other charges related to cost of sales in 1996
included $14.3 million in expense related to inventories adjusted to net
realizable value in conjunction with the Company's deliberate diversification
strategy. The $16.5 million of other charges related to cost of sales in
1995 included $7.9 million in expense related to inventories adjusted to
net realizable value in conjunction with the facilities consolidation program.
................................
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
................................
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment for the
years ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $12,163,000, $12,695,000
and $12,367,000, respectively. As part of the 1993 Corporate Readjustment,
property, plant and equipment was adjusted to reflect fair value and the
balance of accumulated depreciation and amortization was eliminated.
<PAGE> 21
The Company leases certain real property, equipment and machinery under
noncancelable operating leases. Rental expense under these operating leases
for the years ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994 amounted to $4,759,000,
$7,187,000 and $7,251,000, respectively. Future aggregate minimum lease
payments under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable
lease terms in excess of one year as of September 30, 1996 are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) Years ending September 30:
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
1997 $ 3,196
1998 2,575
1999 1,878
2000 1,599
2001 and thereafter 3,480
-------
Total $12,728
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
...............................
6. Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
...............................
The principal components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years
ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994 consist of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal:
Current $ -- 133 (1,010)
Deferred (12,598) (448) 4,177
State, local and foreign 1,224 1,070 1,181
-------- ----- -----
Total $(11,374) 755 4,348
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The actual income tax expense for the years ended September 30, 1996, 1995
and 1994 differs from the expected tax expense for those years (computed by
applying the U.S. Federal statutory rate) as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal corporate statutory rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Utilization of tax net operating loss carryforward -- -- (35.0)
Financial statement goodwill amortization
not recognized for tax purposes 1.1 (1.5) 1.2
Effect of Corporate Readjustment on temporary differences 102.2 (85.5) 33.0
Net change in the balance of the tax valuation allowance 100.2 51.8 --
Effect of subsidiary divestiture on temporary differences (314.0) -- --
Non-taxable income items -- -- (8.0)
Permanent effect of net interest income attributable
to long-term contracts -- 0.5 2.8
Income taxes, net of Federal benefits:
State and local 4.3 1.4 4.5
Foreign 1.1 1.4 1.5
Other, net (6.9) (5.7) (0.6)
----- ----- -----
Effective income tax rate (77.0)% (2.6)% 34.4%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 22
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant
portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at September 30, 1996,
1995 and 1994 are presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Inventories, long-term contract accounting, contract cost
reserves and others $14,538 601 7,118
Pension and other postretirement benefits 9,402 9,538 10,153
Net operating loss carryforwards 42,188 39,366 27,761
Capital loss carryforwards 30,567 -- --
Other compensation-related costs and other cost accruals 2,948 11,278 5,721
------- ------- -------
Total deferred tax assets 99,643 60,783 50,753
Deferred tax liabilities:
Plant and equipment, depreciation methods
and acquisition asset allocations (3,011) (6,609) (6,936)
------- ------- -------
Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance 96,632 54,174 43,817
Less valuation allowance (43,306) (28,537) (43,817)
------- ------- -------
Net deferred tax asset $53,326 25,637 --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Based on the Company's historical pretax income, adjusted for
significant items such as the facilities consolidation, the change in
accounting estimate, and other costs related to cost of sales, together with
management's projections of future taxable income based upon its shift in
strategic direction, management believes it is more likely than not that the
Company will realize a significant portion of the benefits of the net deferred
tax asset existing at September 30, 1996.
In order to fully realize the deferred tax assets existing at September
30, 1996, the Company will need to generate future taxable income of
approximately $120 million prior to the expiration of the net operating loss
(NOL) carryforwards, which will begin to expire in 2006. Also, the Company
will need to generate future capital gains of approximately $87 million prior
to 2001, at which time the capital loss carryforward will expire.
Management believes that the Company will generate sufficient taxable
income to absorb a majority of the net operating loss carryforwards and
deductible temporary differences prior to expiration of the NOLs. There can
be no assurance, however, that the Company will generate any taxable income
or any specific level of continuing taxable income.
During the year ended September 30, 1996, the Company reduced its 1995
net deferred tax asset valuation allowance by $15.8 million, leaving a
remaining balance of $12.7 million. Of the reduction, $15.1 million was
credited directly to additional paid in capital, while the remaining $.7
million was credited to the provision for taxes. A full valuation allowance
of $30.6 million was established against the deferred tax asset associated
with the 1996 recognition of $87.3 million of capital loss resulting from the
sale of Hazeltine.
<PAGE> 23
.......
7. Debt
.......
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Term loan $12,675 20,000
Subordinated term loan, 9.25% -- 8,000
Other -- 1,452
------- ------
12,675 29,452
Less current maturities 1,300 6,000
------- ------
Long-term debt $11,375 23,452
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
In conjunction with the sale of Hazeltine in July 1996, the Company
amended its bank credit facility. The Company maintained its $80 million
revolving credit facility (subject to borrowing base asset limitations),
repaid all outstanding short-term borrowings and paid down the bank term loan
to $13 million. The $13 million term loan has scheduled amortization payments
of $325,000 per quarter commencing in the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
The maturity of the bank credit facility is September 30, 1998. The amended
bank agreement also allowed the Company to use a portion of the Hazeltine
sales proceeds to pay a special cash distribution to shareholders in 1996 and
to repurchase a significant amount of outstanding ESCO common shares in the
open market through the period ending September 30, 1998.
The amended credit facility requires, as determined by certain
financial ratios, a commitment fee ranging from 5/16% to 7/16% per annum on
the unused portion. The terms of the credit facility provide that interest on
borrowings may be calculated at a spread over the London Interbank Offered
Rates (LIBOR), or certificate of deposit rates for various maturities, or
based on the prime rate, at the Company's election. Substantially all of the
assets of the Company are pledged under the credit facility. The most
restrictive financial covenants of the credit facility include minimum
interest coverage, limitations on leverage and minimum tangible net worth.
Dividends may not exceed 25% of the Company's consolidated net earnings.
During 1996 and 1995, the maximum aggregate short-term borrowings at
any month-end were $50 million and $57 million, respectively; the average
aggregate short-term borrowings outstanding based on month-end balances were
$35.1 million and $40.8 million, respectively; and the weighted average
interest rates were 6.9% and 7.3%, respectively. The weighted average
interest rate throughout 1994 was 5.4%. The letters of credit issued and
outstanding under the credit facility totaled $6.4 million and $7.9 million
at September 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Borrowings under the revolving
credit facility were $33 million at September 30, 1995.
The $8 million subordinated term loan payable to Textron, Inc. issued
in connection with the purchase of PTI was repaid in 1996. The "Other debt"
outstanding in 1995 was assumed by GEC.
<PAGE> 24
................
8. Capital Stock
................
The 12,415,346 and 11,574,420 common shares as presented in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 1996 and 1995
represent the actual number of shares issued at the respective dates. The
Company held 566,622 and 570,472 common shares in treasury at September 30,
1996 and 1995, respectively.
Pursuant to a Deposit and Trust Agreement (the Trust Agreement), all of
the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock are held in trust by a
trustee on behalf of the persons otherwise entitled to hold the Company's
common stock, and such persons, instead, hold common stock trust receipts
(Receipts) representing the Company's common stock and associated preferred
stock purchase rights (the Rights). Although the trustee is the record holder
of the Company's common stock, each holder of a Receipt is generally entitled
to all of the rights of a holder of the Company's common stock (including the
right to vote and to receive dividends or other distributions), except in
certain circumstances. If the Company fails in certain circumstances to
collateralize its obligations to indemnify Emerson with respect to Emerson's
guarantees of certain of the Company's government contracts and for so long
as such failure continues, Emerson will have the right to direct the trustee
how to vote in the election of directors and certain related matters.
During 1995, the Company adopted the 1994 Stock Option Plan, and in
1991, the Company adopted the 1990 Stock Option Plan (the Option Plans). The
Option Plans permit the Company to grant key management employees (1) options
to purchase shares of the Company's common stock (or Receipts representing
such shares) or (2) stock appreciation rights with respect to all or any part
of the number of shares covered by the options. As long as the Trust
Agreement is in effect, an optionee will receive Receipts in lieu of shares.
All outstanding options were granted at prices equal to fair market value at
the date of grant. As a result of the $3.00 per share special cash
distribution paid to shareholders in 1996 as a non-taxable return of capital,
unexercised stock options were repriced, and the number of options
outstanding were adjusted, using a method which resulted in no additional
compensation expense to the Company. Information regarding stock options
awarded under the Option Plans is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Option Price
Shares Range per Share
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at September 30, 1995 1,135,301 $3.375 - $12.00
Granted, before repricing 497,250 $8.063 - $12.688
Exercised, before repricing (806,255) $3.375 - $12.00
Cancelled, before repricing (119,257) $7.938 - $12.688
Additional shares due to repricing 182,891 $4.114 - $12.00
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at September 30, 1996, as repriced 889,930 $4.114 - $12.00
At September 30, 1996:
Reserved for future grant 339,424
Exercisable 264,265 $4.114 - $12.00
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 25
During 1996, the Company announced a stock repurchase program. Under
this program, the Company is authorized to purchase up to two million shares
of its common stock in the open market over a period ending September 30,
1998.
During 1993, the Board of Directors authorized, and the shareholders
approved, the Performance Share Plan (the Plan). The maximum number of shares
available for issue under the Plan may not exceed 550,000 shares. At
September 30, 1996, 449,000 shares had been granted under the terms of the
Plan.
The Company has a Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Plan pursuant to
which a dividend of one Right was declared for each outstanding share of the
Companys common stock. Each Right entitles the holder to purchase one
one-hundredth of a share of preferred stock at an initial purchase price of
$25. Approximately 120,000 preferred shares are reserved for issuance under
this plan. Under certain conditions involving the acquisition of, or an offer
for, 20% or more of the Companys common stock, all holders of Rights,
except an acquiring entity, would be entitled (1) to purchase, at a defined
price, common stock of the Company or an acquiring entity at a value twice
the defined price, or (2) at the option of the Board, to exchange each Right
for one share of common stock. The Rights remain in existence until September
30, 2000, unless redeemed earlier (at one cent per Right), exercised or
exchanged under the terms of the plan.
.....................................
9. Retirement and Other Benefit Plans
.....................................
Substantially all employees are covered by defined benefit or defined
contribution pension plans maintained by the Company for the benefit of its
employees. Benefits are provided to employees under defined benefit
pay-related and flat-dollar plans which are primarily noncontributory. Annual
contributions to retirement plans equal or exceed the minimum funding
requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act or applicable
local regulations. Pension expense for the years ended September 30, 1996,
1995 and 1994 is comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Defined benefit plans:
Service cost (benefits earned during the period) $3.2 3.1 4.2
Interest cost 5.0 4.9 4.2
Actual return on plan assets (5.5) (5.0) (3.3)
Net amortization and deferral .8 .7 (.6)
---- ---- ----
Net periodic pension expense 3.5 3.7 4.5
Other -- .1 (1.5)
Defined contribution plans 2.1 2.6 2.7
---- ---- ----
Total $5.6 6.4 5.7
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
During 1994, the Company recognized a $2.5 million pretax curtailment
gain resulting from a major reduction in staffing levels, and a $1 million
pretax loss due to an early retirement incentive program. The gain was
calculated under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 88 (SFAS 88), "Employers' Accounting for Settlements and
Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits."
<PAGE> 26
The funded status of the Company's defined benefit pension plans at
September 30, 1996 and 1995 is shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Accumulated benefit obligation, including vested benefit obligation of
$53.7 and $50.0 at September 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively $57.3 53.8
----- ----
Projected benefit obligation 71.0 68.3
Plan assets at fair value, primarily corporate equity and fixed income securities 58.4 52.1
----- ----
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets 12.6 16.2
Unrecognized transition amount -- --
Unrecognized net loss (2.9) (6.5)
Unrecognized prior service costs (.3) (.4)
Additional minimum liability 1.8 2.1
----- ----
Net pension liability (included in other liabilities) $11.2 11.4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The benefit obligations of the defined benefit plans as of September
30, 1996 and 1995 were both based on a discount rate of 7.5%, and an assumed
rate of increase in compensation levels of 4%. The 1996, 1995 and 1994
pension expense for the defined benefit plans was based on a 7.5%, 8.5% and
7.75% discount rate, respectively; a 4%, 4.75% and 4% increase in
compensation levels, respectively; and a 10% expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets.
In addition to providing retirement income benefits, the Company
provides unfunded postretirement health and life insurance benefits to
certain retirees. To qualify, an employee must retire at age 55 or later and
the employee's age plus service must equal or exceed 75. Retiree
contributions are defined as a percentage of medical premiums. Consequently,
retiree contributions increase with increases in the medical premiums. The
life insurance plans are noncontributory and provide coverage of a flat
dollar amount for qualifying retired employees.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost is comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost $ .2 .3 .4
Interest cost 1.3 1.4 1.4
Other -- (.1) --
----- ---- ----
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost $1.5 1.6 1.8
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 27
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for 1996 and 1995 by
component is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Retirees $13.2 14.2
Fully eligible active plan participants .5 .6
Other active participants 3.0 3.4
----- ----
Total accumulated postretirement benefit obligation 16.7 18.2
Plan assets -- --
----- ----
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation in excess of plan assets 16.7 18.2
Unrecognized prior service cost .1 .1
Unrecognized net gain (loss) .1 (.7)
----- ----
Accrued postretirement benefit obligation (included in other liabilities) $16.9 17.6
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligations of the plans as of
September 30, 1996 and 1995 were both based on a discount rate of 7.5%. The
September 30, 1995 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was based on
a health care cost trend of 8.5% for fiscal 1996, gradually grading down to
an ultimate rate of 5.5% by fiscal 2002. The September 30, 1996 accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation was based on a health care cost trend of 8%
for fiscal 1997, gradually grading down to an ultimate rate of 5.5% by fiscal
2002. A 1% increase in the health care cost trend rate for each year would
increase the September 30, 1996 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
by approximately $350,000.
The 1996, 1995 and 1994 net periodic postretirement benefit costs were
based on a discount rate of 7.5%, 8.5% and 7.75%, respectively. The 1996 net
periodic postretirement benefit cost was based on an assumed health care cost
trend of 8.5% for fiscal 1996, gradually grading down to 5.5% by fiscal 2002.
The 1995 net periodic postretirement benefit cost was based on an assumed
health care cost trend of 9% for fiscal 1995, gradually grading down to 5.5%
by fiscal 2002. The 1994 net periodic postretirement benefit cost was based
on assumed health care cost trend of 9.5% for fiscal 1994, gradually grading
down to 5% by fiscal 2003. A 1% increase in the health care cost trend rate
for each year would increase the aggregate of the service cost and interest
cost components of the 1996 net periodic postretirement benefit cost by
approximately $30,000.
........................
10. Other Financial Data
........................
Items charged to operations during the years ended September 30, 1996,
1995 and 1994 included the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Maintenance and repairs $ 5,826 5,664 6,908
Salaries and wages 136,783 147,813 162,978
-------- ------- -------
Research and development costs:
Company-sponsored 11,905 15,067 14,656
Customer-sponsored 3,894 10,056 9,721
-------- ------- -------
Total $ 15,799 25,123 24,377
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The decrease in 1996 research and development costs is due to lower
spending at Hazeltine prior to its divestiture.
Accrued expenses included accrued employee compensation of $8,820,000
and $11,666,000 at September 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
<PAGE> 28
................................
11. Business Segment Information
................................
The Company's principal business segments are defense and commercial.
Summarized below is the Company's business segment information for the years
ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994. Sales between segments have been
eliminated. Corporate expenses and assets have been allocated to the segment
data on a systematic basis. Hazeltine primarily operated within the defense
segment prior to its divestiture in 1996. Operating profit (loss) is
calculated as: net sales, less cost of sales, less other charges related to
cost of sales, less selling, general and administrative expenses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales:
Defense $300,970 345,076 387,160
Commercial 137,573 95,947 86,695
-------- ------- -------
$438,543 441,023 473,855
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating profit (loss):
Defense $(31,842) 2,812 18,653
Commercial 7,902 2,746 5,633
-------- ------- -------
$(23,940) 5,558 24,286
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identifiable assets:
Defense $191,588 283,617 257,445
Commercial 116,244 94,384 90,041
-------- ------- -------
$307,832 378,001 347,486
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depreciation and amortization:
Defense $ 8,001 9,955 9,905
Commercial 5,485 4,087 3,747
-------- ------- -------
$ 13,486 14,042 13,652
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures:
Defense $ 5,204 7,859 6,191
Commercial 3,354 3,287 3,940
-------- ------- -------
$ 8,558 11,146 10,131
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Net sales derived from U.S. Government agencies, either through direct
sales or through other prime contractors, totaled $231,503,000, $307,970,000
and $352,545,000 for the years ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
International sales included in net sales for the years ended September
30, 1996, 1995 and 1994 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Europe $ 53,856 44,111 32,181
Middle East 19,223 27,314 45,031
Far East 48,391 32,362 20,095
Other 23,215 25,308 18,206
-------- ------- -------
Total $144,685 129,095 115,513
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 29
Hazeltine's international sales for 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $58.6
million, $58.4 million and $41.4 million, respectively. The 1996 European
sales increase primarily reflects additional sales of Combined Interrogator
Transponders (CIT) at Hazeltine prior to divestiture and volume increases at
SEI and PTI Ltd. The decrease in Middle East volume reflects lower sales due
to Hazeltines divestiture. The Far East increase is primarily attributable
to increased sales of defense systems at SEI.
.............................
12. Transactions With Emerson
.............................
(a) Contract Guarantee Arrangement
Emerson has directly or indirectly guaranteed or is otherwise liable
for the performance of most of the Company's contracts with its customers
which existed at September 30, 1990 (the Guaranteed Contracts). The
Guaranteed Contracts include substantially all U.S. Government contracts
entered into by SEI and selected U.S. Government contracts entered into by
Rantec Microwave & Electronics, Inc. and Hazeltine prior to September 30,
1990. As of September 30, 1996, the aggregate backlog of all firm orders
received by the Company included Guaranteed Contracts of $8,768,000. At
September 30, 1996, there were open letters of credit with an aggregate value
of $2,443,000 related to foreign advance payments in support of various
contracts that are directly or indirectly guaranteed by Emerson.
In consideration of these guarantees, and in connection with the
spin-off, the Company paid Emerson a guarantee fee of $7,400,000 per year
during the five-year period ended September 30, 1995. See Note 1(e) for
discussion of the 1995 change in accounting related to the guarantee fee.
(b) Lease and Building Services
SEI, as tenant, entered into a building lease and a services agreement
with Emerson effective October 1, 1990. The building lease and services
agreement was terminated as of September 30, 1995, therefore, there was no
expense recorded in 1996. Rental expense under this lease and other expenses
for related building services aggregated $4,244,000 and $4,956,000 for the
years ended September 30, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
.................................
13. Commitments and Contingencies
.................................
At September 30, 1996, the Company had $8,850,000 in letters of credit
outstanding as guarantees of contract performance.
In 1994, an action was commenced against the Company's Hazeltine
subsidiary alleging injury caused by Hazeltine's purported release of
hazardous materials. The Company believes that no one and no property has
been injured by any release of hazardous substances from Hazeltine's plant.
In 1996, the plaintiffs filed a motion to be certified as a class. Hazeltine
has opposed this motion and the decision is pending. Based upon the current
facts, the Company is not able to estimate the probable outcome. Therefore,
no provision for this litigation has been made in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements. Management believes the Company will be
successful in defending this action and that the outcome will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's financial statements. This
contingent liability was retained by the Company.
As a normal incidence of the business in which the Company is engaged,
various claims, charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the
Company. In the opinion of management, final judgments, if any, which might
be rendered against the Company in current litigation are adequately
reserved, covered by insurance, or would not have a material adverse effect
on its financial statements.
<PAGE> 30
..........................................
14. Other Charges Related to Cost of Sales
and Other Costs and Expenses, Net
..........................................
During 1996, and in conjunction with the sale of Hazeltine and
management's decision to pursue a strategy of deliberate diversification from
defense to commercial, the Company reevaluated the carrying value of certain
assets. As a result of this reevaluation, the Company recorded $25.3 million
of other charges related to cost of sales in 1996.
The 1996 charge includes $14.3 million of inventories related to defense
programs which the Company no longer intends to actively pursue; $6 million of
costs included in other assets incurred in anticipation of certain defense
contract awards which the Company is no longer actively pursuing; and a $5
million adjustment in the Company's estimate of recoveries in a contract
dispute related to the M1000 Trailer program.
Other charges related to cost of sales of $16.5 million incurred during
1995 were related to the facilities consolidation program implemented in
1995. The 1995 charges include an $8.6 million pretax charge for a
non-cash write-off related to the accounting for the lease on the 8100
West Florissant, St. Louis, Missouri facilities which were vacated and a
$7.9 million non-cash pretax charge associated with the disposition of
inventories resulting from the consolidation program and related
restructuring of the Company's West Coast operations.
The 1996 other costs and expenses, net of $5 million includes
miscellaneous non-operating charges. The 1995 other costs and expenses, net of
$29.5 million includes: $16.1 million in amortization of a contract guarantee
fee previously paid to Emerson ($5 million of normal amortization and an $11.1
million adjustment related to the change in accounting estimate at Note 1
(e)); $7.8 million of exit and relocation costs incurred in connection with
the abandonment of the 8100 Building; and $5.6 million of miscellaneous
non-operating charges. The 1994 other costs and expenses, net of $8 million
includes $5 million in amortization of the Emerson contract guarantee fee and
$3 million of miscellaneous non-operating charges.
...............................................
15. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
...............................................
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands, First Second Third Fourth Fiscal
except per share amounts) Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996
Net sales $112,610 117,444 109,103 99,386 438,543
Gross profit (loss) 23,420 25,108 (23,794) 21,790 46,524
Gain on sale of Hazeltine -- -- -- (48,500) (48,500)
Net earnings (loss) 1,922 2,414 (19,411) 41,211 26,136
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary $ .17 .20 (1.72) 3.47 2.26
Fully diluted .17 .20 (1.72) 3.46 2.25
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995
Net sales $ 98,191 109,797 107,939 125,096 441,023
Gross profit (loss) 22,949 9,130 24,049 23,592 79,720
Net loss (9,052) (15,048) (1,233) (4,927) (30,260)
Loss per common share $ (.83) (1.37) (.11) (.45) (2.76)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Gross profit (loss) is computed as net sales, less cost of sales, less
other charges related to cost of sales.
The 1996 quarterly financial information (unaudited) reflects the impact
of the July 1996 sale of Hazeltine and the related gain.
<PAGE> 31
..................................
16. Subsequent Event (Unaudited)
..................................
The Company, on February 7, 1997, completed its acquisition of the
Filtertek and the thermoform packaging businesses of Schawk, Inc. ("Schawk").
Filtertek is a leader in the manufacture of plastic insert injection molded
filter assemblies. The transaction involved the purchase of assets and stock
of subsidiary corporations of Schawk. The assets included manufacturing and
office facilities, equipment, inventories and accounts receivable, and the
Company intends to continue the use of these assets in the on-going operation
of the above-mentioned businesses. The consideration paid was $92 million in
cash plus working capital adjustments, which was funded by cash and borrowings
from the Company's bank credit facility. The consideration was arrived at
through arms-length negotiations between the parties.
ESCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Independent Auditors' Report
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
ESCO Electronics Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ESCO
Electronics Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and 1995,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September
30, 1996. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ESCO
Electronics Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and 1995,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1996, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1(e) to the consolidated financial statements, in
1995, the Company changed its method of accounting for certain guarantee
fees.
/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
November 13, 1996, except as to Note 11
for which the date is May 30, 1997
<PAGE> 32
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Documents filed as a part of this report:
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company
and the Independent Auditors' Report thereon of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
2. Financial statement schedules have been omitted because
the subject matter is disclosed elsewhere in the financial
statements and notes thereto, not required or not applicable,
or the amounts are not sufficient to require submission.
3. Exhibits
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Filed Herewith or Incorporated by
Exhibit Reference to Document Indicated By
Number Description Footnote
- ------- ----------- --------
<C> <S> <C>
2(a)(i) Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May
23, 1996 between ESCO and GEC-Marconi Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 2<F1>
2(a)(ii) First Amendment Agreement dated as of July
19, 1996 to Stock Purchase Agreement listed
as Exhibit 2(a)(i) above Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 2<F1>
3(a) Restated Articles of Incorporation of ESCO Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 3.1<F2>
3(b) Bylaws of ESCO, as amended Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 3(b)<F3>
4(a) Specimen certificate for ESCO's Common
Stock Trust Receipts Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 4(a)<F4>
4(b) Rights Agreement dated as of September 24,
1990 between ESCO and Boatmen's Trust
Company, as Rights Agent Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 4.2<F2>
4(c)(i) Credit Agreement dated as of
September 23, 1990 (as amended and
restated as of December 30, 1992,
amended as of January 15, 1993, October 15,
1993 and November 29, 1993, amended and
restated as of May 27, 1994, amended as of
August 5, 1994, and amended and restated as
of September 29, 1995) among ESCO,
Defense Holding Corp., the Banks listed
therein and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company
of New York, as Agent Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 4(c)<F5>
4(c)(ii) Amendment dated as of June 6, 1996 to
Credit Agreement listed as Exhibit 4(c)(i) above Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 4(c)(ii)<F10>
<PAGE> 33
<C> <S> <C>
4(c)(iii) Amendment dated as of August 2, 1996 to Credit
Agreement listed as Exhibit 4(c)(i) above Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 4(c)(iii)<F10>
No other long-term debt instruments are filed
since the total amount of securities authorized
under any such instrument does not exceed ten
percent of the total assets of ESCO and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. ESCO agrees
to furnish a copy of such instruments to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
4(d) Deposit and Trust Agreement dated as of
September 24, 1990 among ESCO, Emerson Electric Co.,
Boatmen's Trust Company, as Trustee, and the holders
of Receipts from time to time Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 4.3<F2>
10(a) Distribution Agreement dated as of September 24, 1990
by and among ESCO, Emerson Electric Co., and ESCO's
direct and indirect subsidiaries Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 2.1<F2>
10(b) Tax Agreement dated as of September 24, 1990 by and
among ESCO, Emerson Electric Co., and ESCO's direct
and indirect subsidiaries Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 2.2<F2>
10(c)(i) 1990 Stock Option Plan<F*> Incorporated by Reference,Exhibit 10.3<F2>
10(c)(ii) Amendment to 1990 Stock Option Plan dated as of
September 4, 1996<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(c)(ii)<F10>
10(d) Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(g)<F4>
10(e) Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement -
Alternative<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(h)<F4>
10(f) Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement<F*> Incorporated by Refrence, Exhibit 10(i)<F4>
10(g) Form of Split Dollar Agreement<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(j)<F3>
10(h) Form of Indemnification Agreement with each
of ESCO's directors. Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(k)<F3>
10(i) Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 20,
1992 by and between Textron, Inc. and ESCO Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(l)<F6>
10(j)(i) Performance Share Plan<F*> Incorporated by Reference<F7>
10(j)(ii) Amendment to Performance Share Plan dated as
of September 4,1996<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(j)(ii)<F10>
10(k) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as amended
and restated as of August 2, 1993<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(n)<F8>
10(l)(i) Directors' Extended Compensation Plan<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(o)<F8>
10(l)(ii) Compensatory Arrangement with former ESCO director<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(l)(ii)<F10>
10(m)(i) 1994 Stock Option Plan<F*> Incorporated by Reference<F9>
<PAGE> 34
<C> <S> <C>
10(m)(ii) Amendment to 1994 Stock Option Plan dated as of
September 4, 1996<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(m)(ii)<F10>
10(n) Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(n)<F5>
10(o) Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(o)<F5>
10(p) Severance Plan<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(p)<F5>
10(q) Performance Compensation Plan dated as of August 2,
1993 (as amended and restated as of October 1,
1995)<F*> Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 10(q)<F10>
13 The following-listed sections of the Annual Report
to Stockholders for the year ended September 30, 1996:
Shareholders' Summary--Capital Stock Information
Common Stock Market Prices Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 13 <F10>
21 Subsidiaries of ESCO Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit 21<F10>
23 Independent Auditors' Consent
27 Financial Data Schedule
<FN>
- ---------------
<F1> Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K--date of
earliest event reported: July 22, 1996, at the Exhibit indicated
<F2> Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form 10,
as amended on Form 8 filed September 27, l990, at the Exhibit indicated
<F3> Incorporated by reference to Form l0-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, l991, at the Exhibit indicated
<F4> Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1990, at the Exhibit indicated
<F5> Incorporated by Reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1995, at the Exhibit indicated.
<F6> Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1992, at the Exhibit indicated
<F7> Incorporated by reference to Notice of the Annual Meeting of the
Stockholders and Proxy Statement dated December 9, 1992
<F8> Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1993, at the Exhibit indicated
<F9> Incorporated by reference to Notice of the Annual Meeting of the
Stockholders and Proxy Statement dated December 8, 1994
<F10> Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1996 at the Exhibit indicated
<PAGE> 35
<F*> Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 pursuant to Item 14(c) of Part IV.
</TABLE>
(b)(i) The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K during the quarter
ended September 30, 1996, which reported "Item 2. Acquisition or
Disposition of Assets" and "Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits". The
Report related to the sale of Hazeltine Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company. Financial statements filed with the Report were: "Unaudited
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations--Year Ended September 30,
1995"; "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement Of Income--Six Months Ended
March 31, 1996;" and "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet-- March
31, 1996". The date of the Report (date of earliest event reported) was July
22, 1996.
(b)(ii) The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K during the quarter
ended March 31, 1997, which reported "Item 2. Acquisition or
Disposition of Assets" and "Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits". The
Report related to the acquisition of Filtertek. Financial statements filed
with the Report were: "Audited financial statements of Filtertek at December
31, 1996 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended"; "Introduction to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated
Financial Statements"; "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996"; "Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended December 31,
1996"; "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996".
<PAGE> 36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ESCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
By D. J. Moore
--------------------------
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: May 30, 1997
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of l934,
this report has been signed below effective May 30, 1997, by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title
---------- -----
<S> <C>
D. J. Moore Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
P.M. Ford Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
J.J. Adorjan Director
J.J. Carey Director
J.M. McConnell Director
D.C. Trauscht Director
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 37
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibits are listed by numbers corresponding to the Exhibit Table of Item 601
in Regulation S-K.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT
- ----------- -------
<S> <C>
23 Independent Auditors' Consent
27 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
See Item 14(a)3 for a list of exhibits incorporated by reference
<PAGE> 1
Exhibit 23
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
The Board of Directors
ESCO Electronics Corporation:
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-39737, 33-47916, and 33-98112) on Form S-8 of ESCO Electronics
Corporation of our report dated November 13, 1996,except as to Note 11 for
which the date is May 30, 1997 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
ESCO Electronics Corporation and subsidiaries as of September
30, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended September 30, 1996, which report is included in the September 30,
1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of ESCO Electronics
Corporation. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for
certain guarantee fees in fiscal year 1995.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
May 30, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<S> <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START> OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END> SEP-30-1996
<CASH> 22,209
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 34,937<F1>
<ALLOWANCES> 273
<INVENTORY> 51,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 162,650
<PP&E> 80,351
<DEPRECIATION> 26,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 307,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 76,464
<BONDS> 0
<COMMON> 124
0
0
<OTHER-SE> 191,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 307,832
<SALES> 438,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 487,043
<CGS> 392,019
<TOTAL-COSTS> 437,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 5,017
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 4,781
<INCOME-PRETAX> 14,762
<INCOME-TAX> (11,374)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 26,136
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 26,136
<EPS-PRIMARY> 2.26
<EPS-DILUTED> 2.25
<FN>
<F1>This number does not include 51.6 million of Costs and Estimated Earnings
on Long-Term Contracts.
</TABLE>
