<PAGE>
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1999
OR
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File Number 0-18944
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND(SM) II L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
Delaware 13-3584544
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
c/o Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc.
Princeton Corporate Campus
800 Scudders Mill Road - Section 2G
Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
609-282-6996
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
1
<PAGE>
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND(SM) II L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, December 31,
1999 1998
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Investments $32,255,853 $33,791,182
Receivable from investments 535,844 662,200
----------- -----------
TOTAL $32,791,697 $34,453,382
=========== ===========
LIABILITY AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Liability-Redemptions payable $ 535,844 $ 662,200
PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
General Partner:
(832 and 832 SECTOR II Units) 131,369 132,067
(1,595 and 1,595 SECTOR III Units) 264,518 265,921
Limited Partners:
(62,014 and 66,576 SECTOR II Units) 9,791,880 10,567,998
(133,068 and 136,907 SECTOR III Units) 22,068,085 22,825,196
----------- -----------
Total partners' capital 32,255,853 33,791,182
----------- -----------
TOTAL $32,791,697 $34,453,382
=========== ===========
NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT:
SECTOR II UNITS
(Based on 62,846 and 67,408 Units outstanding) $ 157.90 $ 158.74
=========== ===========
SECTOR III UNITS
(Based on 134,663 and 138,502 Units outstanding) $ 165.84 $ 166.72
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements.
2
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND(SM) II L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the three For the three
months ended months ended
March 31, March 31,
1999 1998
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Trading profits
Realized $ -- $ 756,035
Change in unrealized -- 131,064
--------- ---------
Total trading results -- 887,099
--------- ---------
Interest income -- 360,238
Loss from investments (179,740) (821,241)
--------- ---------
Total revenues (179,740) 426,096
--------- ---------
EXPENSES:
Profit Shares -- 242,877
Brokerage commissions -- 623,281
Administrative fees -- 17,808
--------- ---------
Total expenses -- 883,966
--------- ---------
NET LOSS $(179,740) $(457,870)
========= =========
NET LOSS PER UNIT:
Weighted average number of units
outstanding 203,343 253,969
========= =========
Weighted average net loss
per Limited Partner
and General Partner Unit $ (0.88) $ (1.80)
========= =========
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements.
3
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND(SM) II L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
For the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Units Limited Partners
----- ----------------
SECTOR II SECTOR III SECTOR II SECTOR III
UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
December 31, 1997 88,445 168,686 $ 13,494,521 $ 26,199,645
Redemptions (3,682) (7,632) (561,076) (1,206,912)
Net (loss) income -- -- (478,547) 31,773
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
March 31, 1998 84,763 161,054 $ 12,454,898 $ 25,024,506
============ ============ ============ ============
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
December 31, 1998 67,408 138,502 $ 10,567,998 $ 22,825,196
Redemptions (4,562) (3,839) (719,828) (635,761)
Net loss -- -- (56,289) (121,350)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
March 31, 1999 62,846 134,663 $ 9,791,880 $ 22,068,085
============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements.
4
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND(SM) II L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
For the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
General Partner
---------------
SECTOR II SECTOR III Total
UNITS UNITS ------------
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
December 31, 1997 $ 335,409 $ 620,882 $ 40,650,457
Redemptions -- (159) (1,768,147)
Net (loss) income (12,044) 948 (457,870)
------------ ------------ ------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
March 31, 1998 $ 323,365 $ 621,671 $ 38,424,440
============ ============ ============
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
December 31, 1998 $ 132,067 $ 265,921 $ 33,791,182
Redemptions -- -- (1,355,589)
Net loss (698) (1,403) (179,740)
------------ ------------ ------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
March 31, 1999 $ 131,369 $ 264,518 $ 32,255,853
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements.
5
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND(SM) II L.P.
(A Delaware limited partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
These financial statements have been prepared without audit. In the opinion
of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting
of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the
financial position of The SECTOR Strategy Fund(SM) II L.P. (the
"Partnership" or the "Fund") as of March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998,
and the results of its operations for the three months ended March 31, 1999
and 1998. However, the operating results for the interim periods may not be
indicative of the results expected for the full year.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been omitted. It is suggested that these
financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (the "Annual Report").
2. INVESTMENTS
As of March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, the Partnership had an
investment in MM LLC of $32,255,853 and $33,791,182, respectively.
Total revenues and fees with respect to the Fund's investments are set
forth as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the three months Total Brokerage Administrative Profit Loss from
ended March 31, 1999 Revenue Commissions Fees Shares Investments
--------- ----------- -------------- --------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SECTOR II Units
MM LLC $ 198,595 $ 230,900 $ 6,597 $ 18,084 $ (56,986)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total $ 198,595 $ 230,900 $ 6,597 $ 18,084 $ (56,986)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
SECTOR III Units
MM LLC $ 431,869 $ 501,443 $ 14,327 $ 38,853 $(122,754)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total $ 431,869 $ 501,443 $ 14,327 $ 38,853 $(122,754)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Total All Units
MM LLC $ 630,464 $ 732,343 $ 20,924 $ 56,937 $(179,740)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total $ 630,464 $ 732,343 $ 20,924 $ 56,937 $(179,740)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
6
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the three months Total Brokerage Administrative Profit Loss from
ended March 31, 1998 Revenue Commissions Fees Shares Investments
--------- ----------- -------------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SECTOR II Units
JWH LLC $(144,317) $ 44,815 $ 1,281 $ -- $(190,413)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
SECTOR III Units
JWH LLC $(463,921) $ 143,891 $ 4,112 $ -- $(611,924)
Millburn LLC 48,992 65,913 1,883 100 (18,904)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total $(414,929) $ 209,804 $ 5,995 $ 100 $(630,828)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Total All Units
JWH LLC $(608,238) $ 188,706 $ 5,393 $ -- $(802,337)
Millburn LLC 48,992 65,913 1,883 100 (18,904)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total $(559,246) $ 254,619 $ 7,276 $ 100 $(821,241)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
During the second quarter of 1998, the Partnership withdrew its investment in
JWH LLC and Millburn LLC.
Condensed statements of financial condition and statements of operations for MM
LLC, JWH LLC and Millburn LLC are set forth as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MM LLC MM LLC JWH LLC Millburn LLC
-------------- ----------------- -------------- -----------------
March 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
-------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets $117,405,277 $125,332,558
============ ============
Liabilities $ 3,559,790 $ 4,949,082
Members' Capital 113,845,487 120,383,476
------------ ------------
Total $117,405,277 $125,332,558
============ ============
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MM LLC
For the three For the three
For the three months months ended months ended
ended March 31, 1999 March 31, 1998 March 31, 1998
-------------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 2,230,887 $(4,026,600) $ 553,011
Expenses 2,805,784 1,342,197 813,068
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Loss $ (574,897) $(5,368,797) $ (260,057)
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
7
<PAGE>
3. INCOME PER UNIT
The profit and loss of the Sector II and Sector III Units for the three
months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999
----------------------------------------------------------
Sector II Sector III Total
UNITS UNITS All Units
-------------- -------------- --------------
For the three For the three For the three
months ended months ended months ended
March 31, 1999 March 31, 1999 March 31, 1999
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Trading profits (loss):
Realized $ -- $ -- $ --
Change in unrealized -- -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
Total trading results -- -- --
Interest income -- -- --
Loss from investments (56,986) (122,754) (179,740)
----------- ----------- -----------
Total revenues (56,986) (122,754) (179,740)
----------- ----------- -----------
EXPENSES
Profit Shares -- -- --
Brokerage commissions -- -- --
Administrative fees -- -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
Total expenses -- -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
NET INCOME
(LOSS) $ (56,986) $ (122,754) $ (179,740)
=========== =========== ===========
NET INCOME (LOSS)
PER UNITS:
Weighted average number of
units outstanding 66,286 137,057 203,343
----------- ----------- -----------
Weighted average net income (loss) per
Limited Partner and General Partner Unit $ (0.86) $ (0.90) $ (0.88)
=========== =========== ===========
<CAPTION>
1998
----------------------------------------------------------
Sector II Sector III Total
UNITS UNITS All Units
-------------- -------------- --------------
For the three For the three For the three
months ended months ended months ended
March 31, 1998 March 31, 1998 March 31, 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Trading profits (loss):
Realized $ (242,380) $ 998,415 $ 756,035
Change in unrealized 53,887 77,177 131,064
----------- ----------- -----------
Total trading results (188,493) 1,075,592 887,099
Interest income 145,798 214,440 360,238
Loss from investments (190,413) (630,828) (821,241)
----------- ----------- -----------
Total revenues (233,108) 659,204 426,096
----------- ----------- -----------
EXPENSES
Profit Shares 517 242,360 242,877
Brokerage commissions 249,829 373,452 623,281
Administrative fees 7,138 10,670 17,808
----------- ----------- -----------
Total expenses 257,484 626,482 883,966
----------- ----------- -----------
NET INCOME
(LOSS) $ (490,592) $ 32,722 $ (457,870)
=========== =========== ===========
NET INCOME (LOSS)
PER UNITS:
Weighted average number of
units outstanding 87,424 166,545 253,969
----------- ----------- -----------
Weighted average net income (loss) per
Limited Partner and General Partner Unit $ (5.61) $ 0.20 $ (1.80)
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
4. FAIR VALUE AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" (the "Statement"), effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 1999. This Statement supercedes SFAS No. 119
("Disclosure about Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of
Financial Instruments") and SFAS No. 105 ("Disclosure of information about
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Financial Instruments
with Concentrations of Credit Risk") whereby
8
<PAGE>
disclosure of average aggregate fair values and contract/notional values,
respectively, of derivative financial instruments is no longer required for
an entity such as the Partnership which carries its assets at fair value.
Such Statement sets forth a much broader definition of a derivative
instrument. The General Partner does not believe that the application of
the provisions of such statement has a significant effect on the financial
statements.
SFAS No. 133 defines a derivative as a financial instrument or other
contract that has all three of the following characteristics (1) one or
more underlyings, notional amounts or payment provisions (2) requires no
initial net investment or a smaller initial net investment than would be
required relative to changes in market factors (3) terms require or permit
net settlement. Generally, derivatives include a future, forward, swap or
option contract, or other financial instrument with similar characteristics
such as caps, floors and collars.
As of June 1, 1998, the Partnership invested all of its assets in MM LLC.
The Partnership is thus, invested indirectly in the trading of derivative
instruments.
Market Risk
Derivative instruments involve varying degrees of off-balance sheet market
risk, and changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates or the market values of the financial instruments
or commodities underlying such derivative instruments frequently result in
changes in the Partnership's net unrealized profit on such derivative
instruments as reflected in the Statements of Financial Condition or, with
respect to Partnership assets invested in Trading LLCs and in MM LLC, the
net unrealized profit as reflected in the respective Statements of
Financial Condition of the Trading LLCs and MM LLC. The Partnership's
exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the
relationships among the derivative instruments held by the Partnership, the
Trading LLCs and currently MM LLC, as well as the volatility and liquidity
of the markets in which such derivative instruments are traded.
The General Partner has procedures in place intended to control market risk
exposure, although there can be no assurance that they will, in fact,
succeed in doing so. These procedures focus primarily on monitoring the
trading of the Advisors selected from time to time for the Partnership or
MM LLC, adjusting the percentage of the Partnership's, the Trading LLC's or
MM LLC's total assets allocated to trading, calculating the Net Asset Value
of the Advisors' respective Partnership accounts and Trading LLC accounts
or currently MM LLC accounts as of the close of business on each day and
reviewing outstanding positions for over-concentrations both on an
Advisor-by-Advisor and on an overall Partnership basis. While the General
Partner does not itself intervene in the markets to hedge or diversify the
Partnership's market exposure (although the General Partner does adjust the
percentage of the Partnership's total assets allocated to trading), the
General Partner may urge Advisors to reallocate positions, or itself
reallocate Partnership assets among Advisors (although typically only as of
the end of a month) in an attempt to avoid over-concentrations. However,
such interventions are unusual. Except in cases in which it appears that an
Advisor has begun to deviate from past practice or trading policies or to
be trading erratically, the General Partner's basic risk control procedures
consist simply of the ongoing process of Advisor monitoring and selection,
with the market risk controls being applied by the Advisors themselves.
One important aspect of the General Partner's risk controls is its
adjustments to the leverage at which the Partnership trades. By controlling
the percentage of the Partnership's assets allocated to trading, the
General Partner can directly affect the market exposure of the Partnership.
Leverage control is the principal means by which the General Partner hopes
to be able to ensure that Merrill Lynch is never required to make any
payments under its guarantee that the Net Asset Value per Unit (Both Sector
II and Sector III Units) will equal no less than a specified minimum as of
the Principal Assurance Date.
9
<PAGE>
Credit Risk
The risks associated with exchange-traded contracts are typically perceived
to be less than those associated with over-the-counter (non-exchange-
traded) transactions, because exchanges typically (but not universally)
provide clearinghouse arrangements in which the collective credit (in some
cases limited in amount, in some cases not) of the members of the exchange
is pledged to support the financial integrity of the exchange. In
over-the-counter transactions, on the other hand, traders must rely solely
on the credit of their respective individual counterparties. Margins, which
may be subject to loss in the event of a default, are generally required in
exchange trading, and counterparties may require margin in the
over-the-counter markets.
The credit risk associated with these instruments from counterparty
nonperformance, is the net unrealized profit included on the Statements of
Financial Condition.
The Partnership has credit risk in respect of its counterparties and
brokers, but attempts to control this risk by dealing almost exclusively
with Merrill Lynch entities as counterparties and brokers.
The Partnership, in its normal course of business, entered into various
contracts, with Merrill Lynch Futures ("MLF"), a Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
affiliate, acting as its commodity broker. Pursuant to the brokerage
arrangement with MLF (which included a netting arrangement), to the extent
that such trading resulted in receivables from and payables to MLF, these
receivables and payables were offset and reported as a net receivable or
payable.
10
<PAGE>
Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER SECTOR II UNIT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------
Jan. Feb. Mar.
-------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 $155.45 $151.98 $150.75
-------------------------------------------------
1999 $156.73 $158.61 $157.90
-------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER SECTOR III UNIT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------
Jan. Feb. Mar.
-------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 $159.04 $156.52 $159.24
-------------------------------------------------
1999 $164.61 $166.59 $165.84
-------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Performance Summary
January 1, 1998 to March 31, 1998
The Fund's positions in the global interest rate markets were profitable
during the quarter. In Europe, an extended bond market rally continued despite
an environment of robust growth in the United States, Canada and the United
Kingdom, as well as a strong pick-up in growth in continental Europe.
Gold prices drifted sideways and lower as Asian demand continued to slow
and demand in the Middle East was affected by low oil prices. Initially buoyed
on concerns about a U.S.-led military strike against Iraq, crude oil fell to a
nine year low, as the globally warm winter, the return of Iraq as a producer and
the Asian economic crisis added to OPEC's supply glut problems.
Trading results in stock index markets were mixed, but unprofitable,
despite a strong first-quarter performance by the U.S. equity market as several
consecutive weekly gains were recorded with most market averages setting new
highs. Results in currency trading were also mixed, but profitable. In
particular, the Swiss franc weakened versus the U.S. dollar.
Agricultural commodity markets provided profitable trading results overall.
Live cattle and hog prices trended downward throughout the quarter. Cotton
prices moved mostly upward during the quarter, but prices dropped off sharply at
the end of March.
January 1, 1999 to March 31, 1999
The Fund profited from trading in crude oil, heating oil, and unleaded gas.
As the year opened, the global oil balance continued to show signs of being
lopsided with estimated year-end 1998 inventories at their highest levels since
1984. During January, petroleum stocks rose by 21 million barrels compared with
a typical gain of 6 to 7 million barrels. Then, on March 23, OPEC ratified new
production cuts totaling 1.716 million barrels per day at its conference. These
new production cuts were scheduled to go into effect on April 1 and proved to be
harbingers of higher prices for crude.
Agricultural trading was also profitable overall, as gains in live hogs and
live cattle offset losses in corn positions. Hog prices plummeted due to a glut
of hogs in the market. At the beginning of the quarter, the corn market
continued to struggle despite a stretch of solid export business. The market's
negative sentiment was deepened by ongoing favorable weather in South America
which continued through February, even though there was a sharp reduction in
Argentina's planted area. Lack of enthusiasm for new crop and less than
spectacular demand continued to depress the corn market throughout the quarter.
Interest rate trading proved profitable for the Fund as well, as losses in
Japanese 10-year government bonds were offset by gains in 10-year U.S. Treasury
notes and German 10-year bonds. Early in January, the yield on the Japanese
government 10-year bond increased to 1.8%, sharply above the record low of
0.695% it reached on October 7, 1998. This was triggered by the Japanese Trust
Fund Bureau's decision to absorb a smaller share of future issues, leaving the
burden of financing future budget deficits to the private sector.
Losses in aluminum overshadowed slight gains in copper during the first
quarter. In January, burdensome warehouse stocks and questionable demand
prospects weighed on base metals as aluminum
11
<PAGE>
fell to a 5-year low and copper fell to nearly an 11-year low. Major surpluses
in both metals were expected, keeping prices down, and there was no supply side
response to weak demand and lower prices. However, the end of March showed
copper and aluminum leading a surge in base metals as prices recovered from
multi-year lows.
The Fund also suffered losses in currency trading during the quarter, as
losses in Japanese yen overpowered gains in Swiss francs. On a trade-weighted
basis, the Swiss franc ended the quarter at close to a seven-month low, mostly
as a result of the stronger U.S. dollar. In January, the yen had advanced by
nearly 35% against the dollar since early in August, and the Bank of Japan
lowered rates to keep the economy sufficiently liquid so as to allow fiscal
spending to restore some growth to the economy and to drive down the surging
yen.
Stock index trading was also unprofitable, as losses were sustained in Hang
Seng and CAC40 positions. Also of note, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed
above the 10,000 mark for the first time ever at the end of March, setting a
record for the index.
THE YEAR 2000 COMPUTER ISSUE
As the Year 2000 approaches, Merrill Lynch has undertaken initiatives to address
the Year 2000 problem (the "Y2K problem"), as more fully described in the
Partnership's 1998 Form 10-K. The failure of Merrill Lynch's technology systems
relating to a Y2K problem would likely have a material adverse effect on the
company's business, results of operations, and financial condition. This effect
could include disruption of normal business transactions, such as the
settlement, execution, processing, and recording of trades in securities,
commodities, currencies, and other assets. The Y2K problem could also increase
Merrill Lynch's exposure to risk and legal liability and its need for liquidity.
The renovation phase of Merrill Lynch's Year 2000 efforts, as described in the
Partnership's 1998 Form 10-K, was approximately 99.7% completed as of April 16,
1999, and production testing was approximately 99.1% completed as of that date.
In March and April 1999, Merrill Lynch continued its participation in U.S.
industrywide testing sponsored by the Securities Industry Association. These
tests involved an expanded number of firms, transactions, and conditions
compared with those previously conducted.
In light of the interdependency of the parties in or serving the financial
markets, there can be no assurance that all Y2K problems will be identified and
remedied on a timely basis or that all remediation will be successful.
Disruption or suspension of activity in the world's financial markets is also
possible. In some non-U.S. markets in which Merrill Lynch does business, the
level of awareness and remediation efforts relating to the Y2K problem are
thought to be less advanced than in the U.S. Management is unable at this point
to ascertain whether all significant third parties will successfully address the
Y2K problem. Merrill Lynch will continue to monitor third parties' Year 2000
readiness to determine if additional or alternative measures are necessary. The
failure of exchanges, clearing organizations, vendors, service providers,
clients and counterparties, regulators, or others to resolve their own
processing issues in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on
Merrill Lynch's business, results of operations, and financial condition.
As of March 26, 1999, the total estimated expenditures for the Year 2000
compliance initiative are approximately $520 million. This estimate includes
$104 million of occupancy, communications, and other related overhead
expenditures as Merrill Lynch is applying a fully costed pricing methodology for
this project. Of the total estimated expenditures, approximately $157 million
remains to be spent, primarily on continued testing, contingency planning, and
risk management. There can be no assurance that the costs associated with
remediation efforts will not exceed those currently anticipated by Merrill
Lynch, or that the possible failure of such remediation efforts will not have a
material adverse effect on Merrill Lynch's business, results of operations, or
financial condition.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the
Fund's open positions by market category as of March 31, 1999 and December 31,
1998, and the average of the three months for
12
<PAGE>
January 1999 through March 1999. As of March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, the
Fund's total capitalization was approximately $32,255,852 and $34 million, all
of which was allocated to trading.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
------------------------------- -------------------------------
% OF TOTAL % OF TOTAL
MARKET SECTOR VALUE AT RISK CAPITALIZATION VALUE AT RISK CAPITALIZATION
------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest Rates $ 397,823 1.23% $ 159,263 0.47%
Currencies 301,733 .94 294,936 0.89
Stock Indices 285,329 .88 79,470 0.23
Metals 66,870 .21 115,273 0.34
Commodities 112,590 .35 78,680 0.23
Energy 187,495 .58 63,550 0.18
------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
$ 1,351,870 4.19% $ 791,172 2.34%
============= ============ ============ ============
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE MONTH-END
FOR THE PERIOD
January 1999 through March 1999
-------------------------------
% OF TOTAL
MARKET SECTOR VALUE AT RISK CAPITALIZATION
------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Interest Rates $ 796,790 2.40%
Currencies 289,297 .87
Stock Indices 266,963 .81
Metals 97,823 .29
Commodities 127,844 .39
Energy 107,312 .32
------------- ------------
$ 1,686,029 5.08%
============= ============
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE>
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no pending proceedings to which the Partnership or the General Partner
is a party.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) None.
(b) None.
(c) None.
(d) None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits
There are no exhibits required to be filed as part of this report.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
There were no reports on Form 8-K filed during the first three months
of fiscal 1999.
14
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND(SM) II L.P.
By: MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC.
(General Partner)
Date: May 11, 1999 By /s/ JOHN R. FRAWLEY, JR.
------------------------
John R. Frawley, Jr.
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
Date: May 11, 1999 By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO
------------------------
Michael L. Pungello
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<S> <C> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1999 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END> MAR-31-1999 MAR-31-1998
<CASH> 0 0
<RECEIVABLES> 32,791,697 39,594,222
<SECURITIES-RESALE> 0 0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED> 0 0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED> 0 0
<PP&E> 0 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 32,791,697 39,594,222
<SHORT-TERM> 0 0
<PAYABLES> 535,844 1,169,782
<REPOS-SOLD> 0 0
<SECURITIES-LOANED> 0 0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD> 0 0
<LONG-TERM> 0 0
0 0
0 0
<COMMON> 0 0
<OTHER-SE> 32,255,853 38,424,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 32,791,697 39,594,222
<TRADING-REVENUE> 0 887,099
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS> 0 360,238
<COMMISSIONS> 0 883,966
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES> (179,740) (821,241)
<FEE-REVENUE> 0 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0 0
<COMPENSATION> 0 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> (179,740) (457,870)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY> (179,740) (457,870)
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0 0
<CHANGES> 0 0
<NET-INCOME> (179,740) (457,870)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (0.88) 1.80
<EPS-DILUTED> (0.88) 1.80
</TABLE>
