<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
------------------
FORM 10-K/A
(Mark One)
X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
- --- ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT FOR SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
- --- EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
-------------------- ---------------------
Commission File number 1-7184
B. F. SAUL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland 52-6053341
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
8401 Connecticut Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (301) 986-6000
-----------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
N/A N/A
- ----------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
requires to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirement for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to
this Form 10-K. /x/
There were no Common Shares of Beneficial Interest held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of December 4, 1998.
The number of Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $1 Par Value, outstanding as
of December 4, 1998 was 4,826,910.
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General ...........................................................
Real Estate ..................................................
Banking
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES ...................................................
Real Estate .......................................................
Banking ...........................................................
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ............................................
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS ..........
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS .................................
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ......................................
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ...............
Financial Condition ...............................................
Real Estate ..................................................
Banking ......................................................
Liquidity and Capital Resources ...................................
Real Estate ..................................................
Banking ......................................................
Liquidity ...............................................
Capital .................................................
Results of Operations .............................................
Fiscal 1998 Compared to Fiscal 1997 ..........................
Real Estate .............................................
Banking .................................................
Fiscal 1997 Compared to Fiscal 1996 ..........................
Real Estate .............................................
Banking .................................................
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK....
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA ..................
Management's Statement on Responsibility ..........................
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE .........................
PART III
ITEM 10. TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVES OFFICERS OF THE TRUST ................
Executive Officers of the Trust Who Are Not Directors ............
Committees of the Board of Trustees ..............................
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION .......................................
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT .......................................
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS ...............
Real Estate .............................................
Banking .................................................
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K .....................................
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust operates as a Maryland real estate
investment trust. The Trust began its operations in 1964 as an unincorporated
business trust organized under a Declaration of Trust governed by District of
Columbia law. The Trust terminated its status as a qualified real estate
investment trust for federal income tax purposes in 1978 and is now taxable as a
corporation. On October 24, 1988, the Trust amended its Declaration of Trust to
qualify the Trust as a statutory real estate investment trust under Maryland
law.
The principal business activity of the Trust and its real estate subsidiaries is
the ownership and development of income-producing properties. The Trust owns 80%
of the outstanding common stock of Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B., whose assets
accounted for 95% of the Trust's consolidated assets at September 30, 1998. The
Trust is a thrift holding company by virtue of its ownership of a majority
interest in Chevy Chase. See "Real Estate - Holding Company Regulation."
The Trust recorded net income of $66.1 million in the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1998, compared to a net income of $18.9 million in the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1997 and a net loss of $78,000 in the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1996.
The Trust has prepared its financial statements and other disclosures on a fully
consolidated basis. The Term "Trust" used in the text and the financial
statements included herein refers to the combined entity, which includes B. F.
Saul Real Estate Trust and its subsidiaries, including Chevy Chase and Chevy
Chase's subsidiaries. "Real Estate Trust" refers to B. F. Saul Real Estate
Investment Trust and its subsidiaries, excluding Chevy Chase and Chevy Chase's
subsidiaries. The operations conducted by the Real Estate Trust are designated
as "Real Estate," while the business conducted by Chevy Chase and its
subsidiaries is identified by "Banking."
Real Estate.
The Real Estate Trust's long-term objectives are to increase cash flow from
operations and to maximize capital appreciation of its real estate. The
properties owned by the Real Estate Trust are located predominantly in the
mid-atlantic and southeastern regions of the United States and consist
principally of hotels, office and industrial projects, and undeveloped land
parcels.
Banking.
Chevy Chase is a federally chartered and federally insured stock savings bank
which at September 30, 1998 was conducting business from 143 full-service branch
offices, including 11 in-store banking centers, and 696 automated teller
machines in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia. The bank has its
home office in McLean, Virginia and its executive offices in Chevy Chase,
Maryland, both suburban communities of Washington, D.C. The bank also maintains
14 mortgage loan production offices in the mid-atlantic region, 13 of which are
operated by a wholly-owned mortgage banking subsidiary, and 31 consumer loan
production offices, 24 of which are operated by a wholly-owned finance
subsidiary. At September 30, 1998, the bank had total assets of $6.7 billion and
total deposits of $4.9 billion. Based on total assets at September 30, 1998,
Chevy Chase is the largest bank headquartered in the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area.
Chevy Chase is a consumer oriented, full service banking institution principally
engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the public and using such
deposits, together with borrowings and other funds, to make loans secured by
real estate, primarily residential mortgage loans and consumer loans. The bank
also has an active commercial lending program. The bank's principal deposit and
lending markets are located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. As a
complement to its basic deposit and lending activities, the bank provides a
number of related financial services to its customers, including securities
brokerage and insurance products offered through its subsidiaries. On November
12, 1997, the bank acquired ASB Capital Management, Inc., one of the largest
SEC-registered investment managers headquartered in the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area, through which the bank provides a variety of investment
products and fiduciary services to a primarily institutional customer base.
On September 30, 1998, the bank sold its credit card operations to First USA
Bank, N.A.. The credit card portfolio purchased by FUSA included approximately
$4.8 billion of managed credit card loans and 3.1 million Visa and Mastercard
credit card accounts. The bank recognized a net gain on this sale of $288.3
million. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Management believes that the ongoing consolidation in the credit card industry
was making it increasingly difficult for relatively smaller institutions like
the bank to make the investments in technology and other resources necessary to
compete effectively with increasingly larger and more specialized issuers.
In light of these competitive considerations, management believes that selling
the bank's credit card business will relieve the bank of the substantial
financial commitments necessary to maintain its credit card operations, and
enable the bank to concentrate its resources on capitalizing on the bank's
status as the largest locally-headquartered bank in the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area and further its community banking objectives. Accordingly, the
bank will continue to build its branch and alternative delivery systems,
maintain and expand its mortgage banking operations, and continue to offer a
broad range of non-credit card consumer products, including home equity lines of
credit, home improvement loans and automobile loans.
In addition, the bank anticipates expanding its business banking program, with
an emphasis on businesses in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The bank
will also seek to develop further the fee based services it can provide to
customers, including securities brokerage, asset management and insurance
products offered through its subsidiaries.
Chevy Chase Bank recorded operating income of $184.4 million for the year ended
September 30, 1998, compared to operating income of $80.2 million for the year
ended September 30, 1997. At September 30, 1998, the bank's tangible, core, tier
1 risk-based and total risk-based regulatory capital ratios were 7.93%, 7.93%,
12.93% and 20.70%. The bank's regulatory capital ratios exceeded the
requirements under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement
Act of 1989, also known as "FIRREA," as well as the standards established for
well capitalized institutions under the prompt corrective action regulations
established pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement
Act of 1991, also known as "FDICIA".
Chevy Chase is subject to comprehensive regulation, examination and supervision
by the Office of Thrift Supervision and, to a lesser extent, by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation. The bank's deposit accounts are fully insured up
to $100,000 per insured depositor by the SAIF, which is administered by the
FDIC.
<PAGE>
REAL ESTATE
Real Estate Investments
The following tables set forth, at and for the periods indicated, certain
information regarding the properties in the Real Estate Trust's investment
portfolio at September 30, 1998.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
HOTELS
Average Occupancy (2) Average Room Rate
------------------------ ------------------------
Year Ended September 30, Year Ended September 30,
Available ------------------------ ------------------------
Location Name Rooms(1) 1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996
- ------------ -------------------------------------- ---------- ------------------------ -------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
COLORADO
Pueblo Holiday Inn - Pueblo 193 74% 74% 75% $51.39 $53.09 $54.84
MARYLAND
Gaithersburg Holiday Inn - Gaithersburg 300 64% 65% 61% $75.75 $70.10 $68.93
MICHIGAN
Auburn Hills Holiday Inn - Auburn Hills 190 74% 74% 75% $99.78 $94.79 $86.52
NEW YORK
Rochester Holiday Inn - Rochester Airport 280 71% 71% 68% $72.25 $68.26 $66.51
OHIO
Cincinnati Holiday Inn - Cincinnati 273 64% 58% 49% $65.70 $63.21 $66.67
VIRGINIA
Arlington Holiday Inn - National Airport (3) 308 57% -- -- $102.38 -- --
Arlington Howard Johnsons - National Airport 279 63% 66% 71% $76.10 $67.99 $66.37
Herndon Holiday Inn Express (4) 115 75% 74% -- $76.83 $64.70 --
McLean Holiday Inn - Tysons Corner 316 72% 74% 73% $99.15 $87.52 $78.98
Sterling Hampton Inn - Dulles Airport 127 74% 77% 77% $82.17 $71.70 $62.87
Sterling Holiday Inn - Dulles Airport 296 75% 75% 76% $85.10 $72.18 $63.86
Sterling TownePlace Suites - Dulles Airport (5) 95 56% -- -- $83.65 -- --
----- --- --- --- ------ ------ ------
Totals 2,772 68% 70% 68% $81.01 $72.21 $68.79
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Available rooms as of September 30, 1998.
(2) Average occupancy is calculated by dividing the rooms occupied by the
rooms available.
(3) Acquired December 10, 1997.
(4) Acquired October 30, 1996.
(5) Opened August 13, 1998.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL
Expiring Leases (1)
-------------------
Leasing Percentages Year Ending
Gross ------------------------- -------------------
September 30, September 30,
Leasable ------------------------- -------------------
Location Name Area (1) 1998 1997 1996 1999 2000
- --------------- -------------------------- -------- ------------------------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FLORIDA
Fort Lauderdale Commerce Center - Phase II 61,124 100% 97% 92% 29,100 8,219
GEORGIA
Atlanta 900 Circle 75 Parkway 345,502 100% 98% 95% 49,165 55,575
Atlanta 100 Circle 75 Parkway 89,412 100% 98% 100% 9,771 38,056
Atlanta 1100 Circle 75 Parkway 269,049 100% 99% 100% 109,182 30,856
LOUISIANA
Metairie Metairie Tower 91,372 100% 95% 99% 12,879 22,615
VIRGINIA
McLean 8201 Greensboro Drive 353,742 100% 99% 85% 48,948 53,737
Sterling Dulles North 59,886 100% 100% 81% -- --
--------- ---- ---- ---- ------- -------
Totals 1,270,087 100% 99% 93% 259,045 209,058
20.4% 16.5%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Square feet
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
LAND PARCELS
Location Name Acres Zoning
- ---------------- -------------------------------- -------- -----------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
FLORIDA
Boca Raton Arvida Park of Commerce (1) 20 Mixed Use
Fort Lauderdale Commerce Center (2) 14 Office & Warehouse
GEORGIA
Atlanta Circle 75 133 Office & Industrial
KANSAS
Overland Park Overland Park 162 Residential, Office & Retail
MARYLAND
Gaithersburg Avenel Business Park (3) 5 Commercial
Rockville Flagship Centre 8 Commercial
MICHIGAN
Auburn Hills Holiday Inn - Auburn Hills 4 Commercial
NEW YORK
Rochester Holiday Inn - Rochester Airport 3 Commercial
VIRGINIA
Loudoun County Church Road 40 Office & Industrial
Loudoun County Sterling Boulevard (4) 45 Industrial
---
Total 434
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Real Estate Trust is currently developing a 91-unit
hotel and a 146-unit hotel on a portion of its 9 acre parcel.
The balance of 11 acres is owned by a partnership in which a
Real Estate Trust subsidiary owns a 50% interest.
(2) The Real Estate Trust is currently developing a 95-unit
hotel on a portion of this parcel.
(3) The Real Estate Trust is currently developing a 91-unit
hotel on a portion of this parcel.
(4) The Real Estate Trust is currently developing a 78,000
office/research and development building on a portion of this parcel.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
Location Name
--------------- ------------------------------
PURCHASE - LEASEBACK PROPERTIES (1)
APARTMENTS
Number
of Units
--------
LOUISIANA
Metairie Chateau Dijon 336
TENNESSEE
Knoxville Country Club 232
---
Total 568
SHOPPING CENTERS
Gross
Leasable
Area (2)
--------
GEORGIA
Atlanta Old National 160,000
Warner Robbins Houston Mall 264,000
-------
Total 424,000
APARTMENT PROJECT
Number
of Units
TEXAS --------
Dallas San Simeon 124
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Trust owns the ground under certain income-producing properties and
receives fixed ground rent, which is subject to periodic escalation, from
the owners of the improvements. In certain instances, the Real Estate Trust
also receives percentage rent based upon the income generated by the
properties.
(2) Square feet.
The investment portfolio consists principally of seasoned operating properties.
The Real Estate Trust expects to hold its properties as long-term investments
and has no maximum period for retention of any investment. It may acquire
additional income-producing properties, expand and improve its properties, or
sell such properties, as and when circumstances warrant. The Real Estate Trust
also may participate with other entities in property ownership, through joint
ventures or other types of co-ownership.
<PAGE>
Investment in Saul Holdings Limited Partnership
On August 26, 1993, the Real Estate Trust consummated a series of transactions
in which it transferred its 22 shopping center properties and one of its office
properties, together with the debt associated with such properties, to a newly
organized limited partnership, Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, and one of
two newly organized subsidiary limited partnerships of Saul Holdings
Partnership.
In exchange for the transferred properties, the Real Estate Trust received
securities representing a 21.5% limited partnership interest in Saul Holdings
Partnership. Entities under common control with the Trust received limited
partnership interests collectively representing a 5.5% partnership interest in
Saul Holdings Partnership in exchange for the transfer of property management
functions and certain other properties to Saul Holding Partnership and its
subsidiaries. Saul Centers, Inc., a newly organized, publicly held real estate
investment trust, received a 73.0% general partnership interest in Saul Holdings
Partnership in exchange for the contribution of approximately $220.7 million to
Saul Holdings Partnership.
Affiliates of the Trust received certain cash distributions from Saul Holdings
Partnership and purchased 4.0% of the common stock of Saul Centers in a private
offering consummated concurrently with the initial public offering of such
common stock. B. Francis Saul II, the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and
Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, also serves as Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Saul Centers.
The Real Estate Trust and affiliates of the Trust own rights enabling them to
convert their limited partnership interests in Saul Holdings Partnership into
shares of Saul Centers common stock on the basis of one share of Saul Centers
common stock for each partnership unit provided that they do not own rights to
the extent that they collectively would be treated as owning, directly or
indirectly, more than 24.9% of the value of the outstanding equity securities of
Saul Centers. The shares of Saul Centers common stock are listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under trading symbol "BFS".
In January 1998, in accordance with its obligation under an exclusivity
agreement described below, the Real Estate Trust offered Saul Centers the right
to purchase its newly constructed, 100% leased office/flex building located in
the Avenel Business Park adjacent to Saul Centers' Avenel I - III buildings. The
new building contained 46,227 square feet of leasable area. An independent
appraisal determined the purchase price of $5.6 million. Saul Centers agreed to
purchase the property as of April 1, 1998, by assuming the mortgage of $3.7
million and issuing 105,992 new units in Saul Centers' operating partnership to
the Real Estate Trust.
At September 30, 1998, Saul Holdings Partnership owned, directly or indirectly
through the Subsidiary Partnerships, 29 community and neighborhood shopping
centers located in seven states and the District of Columbia, one office
property and one office/retail property located in the District of Columbia, one
research park located in a Maryland suburb of Washington, D.C. and one property
planned to be converted to an industrial/warehouse facility located in Oklahoma.
Saul Centers. Saul Centers made an election to be treated as a real estate
investment trust for federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860
of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the year ended December 31, 1993.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, REITs are subject to numerous organizational
and operational requirements. If Saul Centers continues to qualify as a REIT, it
generally will not be subject to federal income tax, provided it makes certain
distributions to its stockholders and meets certain organizational and other
requirements. Saul Centers has announced that it intends to make regular
quarterly dividend distributions to its stockholders.
Management of the Properties. Saul Holdings Partnership and its subsidiaries
manage their portfolio properties and any subsequently acquired properties
through their management functions, which include personnel and such functions
as property management, leasing, design, renovation, development and accounting.
Saul Holdings Partnership and its subsidiaries have a fully integrated property
management capability through approximately 150 professionals and staff
personnel and with an extensive and mature network of relationships with tenants
and potential tenants as well as with members of the brokerage and property
owners' communities.
Saul Centers shares with affiliates of the Trust certain ancillary functions at
cost, such as computer and payroll services, benefit administration and in-house
legal services, and shares insurance expense on a pro rata basis. Affiliates of
the Trust sublease office space to Saul Centers at cost. The terms of all
sharing arrangements, including payments related thereto, are reviewed
periodically by the independent directors of Saul Centers, who constitute five
of the nine members of the board of directors.
Exclusivity Agreement and Right of First Refusal. The Real Estate Trust has
entered into an exclusivity agreement with, and has granted a right of first
refusal to, Saul Centers and Saul Holdings Partnership. The purpose of these
agreements is to minimize potential conflicts of interest between the Real
Estate Trust, Saul Centers and Saul Holdings Partnership. The exclusivity
agreement and right of first refusal generally require the Real Estate Trust to
conduct its shopping center business exclusively through Saul Centers and Saul
Holdings Partnership and to grant these entities a right of first refusal to
purchase commercial properties and development sites that become available to
the Real Estate Trust in the District of Columbia or adjacent suburban Maryland.
Subject to the exclusivity agreement and right of first refusal, the Real Estate
Trust will continue to develop, acquire, own and manage commercial properties
and own land suitable for development as, among other things, shopping centers
and other commercial properties.
Allocations and Distributions of Saul Holdings Partnership. The net income or
net loss of Saul Holdings Partnership for tax purposes generally will be
allocated to Saul Centers and the limited partners in accordance with their
percentage interests, subject to compliance with the applicable provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Net cash
flow after reserves of Saul Holdings Partnership and after reimbursement of
specified expenses will be distributed quarterly to the partners in proportion
to their respective partnership interests.
Reimbursement Agreement. Pursuant to a reimbursement agreement among the
partners of Saul Holdings Partnership and certain of their affiliates, the Real
Estate Trust and two of its subsidiaries have agreed to reimburse Saul Centers
and the other partners in the event Saul Holdings Partnership fails to make
payments with respect to certain portions of its debt obligations and Saul
Centers or any such other partners personally make payments with respect to such
debt obligations. The maximum potential obligations of the Real Estate Trust and
its subsidiaries under this agreement total $115.5 million. See Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. The Real Estate Trust
believes that Saul Holdings Partnership will be able to make all payments due
with respect to their debt obligations.
Tax Conflicts. The fair market value of each of the properties contributed to
Saul Holdings Partnership and its subsidiaries by the Real Estate Trust and its
subsidiaries at the date of the formation transactions exceeded the tax basis of
such property. In the event Saul Centers or its wholly owned subsidiary Saul
QRS, Inc., acting as general partner, causes such partnership to dispose of, or
there is an involuntary disposition of, one or more of such properties, a
disproportionately large share of the total gain for federal income tax purposes
would be allocated to the Real Estate Trust or its subsidiaries as a result of
the property disposition. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
this report.
Registration Rights. Saul Centers has granted the Real Estate Trust and its
affiliates certain "demand" and "piggyback" registration rights with respect to
the shares of Saul Centers common stock acquired in connection with the
formation transactions or as a consequence of exercise of those rights. Subject
to certain limitations, the registration rights grant the Real Estate Trust and
its affiliates the opportunity to cause Saul Centers to register all or any
portion of their shares once in each calendar year and to have the shares
registered incidentally to any registration by Saul Centers of shares of common
stock or other securities substantially similar to common stock. Saul Centers
will bear expenses incident to its registration obligations upon exercise of the
registration rights, except that it will not bear any underwriting discounts or
commissions, Securities and Exchange Commission or state Blue Sky registration
fees, or transfer taxes relating to registration of the shares.
Competition
As an owner of, or investor in, commercial real estate properties, the Real
Estate Trust is subject to competition from a variety of other owners of similar
properties in connection with their sale, lease or other disposition and use.
Management believes that success in such competition is dependent upon the
geographic location of the property, the performance of property managers, the
amount of new construction in the area and the maintenance and appearance of the
property. Additional competitive factors with respect to commercial and
industrial properties are the ease of access to the property, the adequacy of
related facilities such as parking, and the ability to provide rent concessions
and additional tenant improvements without increasing rent. Management believes
that general economic circumstances and trends and new properties in the
vicinity of each of the Real Estate Trust's properties also will be competitive
factors.
Environmental Matters
The Real Estate Trust's properties are subject to various laws and regulations
relating to environmental and pollution controls. The Real Estate Trust requires
an environmental study to be performed with respect to a property that may be
subject to possible environmental hazards prior to its acquisition to ascertain
that there are no material environmental hazards associated with such property.
Although the effect upon the Real Estate Trust of the application of
environmental and pollution laws and regulations cannot be predicted with
certainty, management believes that their application either prospectively or
retrospectively will not have a material adverse effect on the Real Estate
Trust's property operations.
Relationships with the B. F. Saul Company
The Real Estate Trust has significant relationships with B. F. Saul Company and
two of B. F. Saul Company's wholly owned subsidiaries, B.F. Saul Advisory
Company, referred to in this report as the "Advisor," and Franklin Property
Company. B. F. Saul Company, founded in 1892, specializes in real estate
investment services, including acquisitions, financing, management and leasing,
and insurance. B. Francis Saul II, Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief
Executive Officer of the Trust, is Chairman of the Board and President of B. F.
Saul Company and the Advisor.
The Advisor acts as the Real Estate Trust's investment advisor and manages the
day-to-day financial, accounting, legal and administrative affairs of the Real
Estate Trust. Franklin acts as leasing and management agent for the
income-producing properties owned by the Real Estate Trust, and plans and
oversees the development of new properties and the expansion and renovation of
existing properties.
The Trustees, including the two independent Trustees, review the fees and
compensation arrangements between the Real Estate Trust and B. F. Saul Company
and its related entities and affiliates and believe that such fees and
compensation arrangements are as favorable to the Real Estate Trust as would be
obtainable from unaffiliated sources. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
Holding Company Regulation
The Trust and B.F. Saul Company, by virtue of their direct and indirect control
of the bank, and Chevy Chase Property Company, referred to in this report as
"CCPC," and CCPC's wholly-owned subsidiary, Westminster Investing Corporation,
by virtue of Westminster's direct and indirect ownership of 24.9% of the common
stock of the Trust, are "savings and loan holding companies" subject to
regulation, examination and supervision by the OTS.
The bank is prohibited from making or guaranteeing loans or advances to or for
the benefit of the holding companies or other affiliates engaged in activities
beyond those permissible for bank holding companies and from investing in the
securities of the holding companies or other affiliates. Further, transactions
between the bank and the holding companies must be on terms substantially the
same, or at least as favorable to the bank, as those that would be available to
non-affiliates. The holding companies must obtain the prior approval of the OTS
before acquiring by merger, consolidation or purchase of assets any federally
insured savings institution or any savings and loan holding company.
As unitary savings and loan holding companies, the holding companies are
virtually unrestricted in the types of business activities in which they may
engage, provided the bank continues to meet the qualified thrift lender test.
See "Banking Regulation - Qualified Thrift Lender Test If the holding companies
were to acquire one or more federally insured institutions and operate them as
separate subsidiaries rather than merging them into the bank, the holding
companies would become "multiple" savings and loan holding companies.
As multiple savings and loan holding companies, the holding companies would be
subject to limitations on the types of business activities in which they would
be permitted to engage, unless the additional thrifts were troubled institutions
acquired pursuant to certain emergency acquisition provisions and all subsidiary
thrifts met the Qualified Thrift Lender Test. The holding companies may acquire
and operate additional savings institution subsidiaries outside of Maryland and
Virginia only if the laws of the target institution's state specifically permit
such acquisitions or if the acquisitions are made pursuant to emergency
acquisition provisions.
The Trust and B. F. Saul Company entered into an agreement with OTS's
predecessor, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, to maintain the
bank's regulatory capital at the required levels, and, if necessary, to infuse
additional capital to enable the bank to meet those requirements. Since the
execution of this agreement among the Trust, B. F. Saul Company and the OTS's
predecessor, the OTS has changed its policy and now accepts more limited
agreements from those acquiring thrift institutions. In addition, the regulatory
capital requirements applicable to the bank have changed significantly as a
result of FIRREA. The OTS has stated that capital maintenance agreements entered
into prior to such modification of OTS policy and the enactment of FIRREA were
not affected by such changes. The Trust and B. F. Saul Company have not sought
to modify the existing agreement. To the extent the bank is unable to meet
regulatory capital requirements in the future, the OTS could seek to enforce the
obligations of the Trust and B. F. Saul Company under the agreement. The bank's
business plan does not contemplate any future capital contributions from the
Trust or B. F. Saul Company.
If the bank were to become "undercapitalized" under the prompt corrective action
regulations, it would be required to file a capital restoration plan with the
OTS setting forth, among other things, the steps the bank would take to become
"adequately capitalized." The OTS could not accept the plan unless the holding
companies guaranteed in writing the bank's compliance with that plan. The
aggregate liability of the holding companies under such a commitment would be
limited to the lesser of (1) an amount equal to 5.0% of the bank's total assets
at the time the bank became "undercapitalized" and (2) the amount necessary to
bring the bank into compliance with all applicable capital standards as of the
time the bank fails to comply with its capital plan. If the holding companies
refused to provide the guarantee, the bank would be subject to the more
restrictive supervisory actions applicable to "significantly undercapitalized"
institutions.
Federal Taxation
The Trust terminated its status as a real estate investment trust for federal
income tax purposes in 1978 and is now taxable as a corporation. The Trust and
its subsidiaries join in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return
using the accrual method of accounting on the basis of a fiscal year ending
September 30.
Since June 28, 1990 the bank and its subsidiaries have joined in the
consolidated federal income tax returns filed by the Trust on a fiscal year
basis. Each member of an affiliated group of corporations which files
consolidated income tax returns is liable for the group's federal income tax
liability. Prior to June 28, 1990, the bank and its subsidiaries filed a
consolidated federal income tax return on a calendar-year basis.
Savings institutions such as the bank generally are taxed in the same manner as
other corporations. There are, however, several special rules that apply
principally to savings institutions and, in some cases, other financial
institutions. Certain significant aspects of the federal income taxation of the
bank are discussed below.
The Internal Revenue Service has concluded the audits of the federal income tax
returns of the Trust for the taxable years ended September 30, 1992, September
30, 1993 and September 30, 1994. The IRS audit adjustments did not have a
significant adverse effect on the Trust's reported earnings under generally
accepted accounting principles. The IRS has notified the Trust that its
consolidated federal tax return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995 has
been selected for review, which could lead to an IRS audit.
Bad Debt Reserve. For taxable years beginning before December 31, 1995, savings
institutions that satisfied certain requirements were permitted to establish
reserves for bad debts and to deduct each year reasonable additions to those
reserves in lieu of taking a deduction for bad debts actually sustained during
the taxable year. To qualify for this treatment, at least 60% of a savings
institution's assets had to be "qualifying assets," including cash, certain U.S.
and state government securities, and loans secured by interests in residential
real property.
In establishing its reserves from calendar year 1988 through fiscal year 1996,
the bank calculated its bad debt deduction for tax purposes using the experience
method. The experience method was based on the institution's actual loan loss
experience over a prescribed period. For the year ended September 30, 1996,
accumulated reserves were approximately $111.8 million.
Provisions that repealed the thrift bad debt provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code were included in the Small Business Act of 1996 and took effect for tax
years beginning after December 31, 1995. As a result, for its fiscal year 1997
and fiscal year 1998, the bank is no longer able to use the "reserve method" for
computing its bad debt deduction and can deduct only those bad debts actually
incurred during the respective taxable years. The bad debt provisions of this
legislation also require thrifts to recapture and pay tax on bad debt reserves
accumulated since 1987 over a six year period, beginning with a thrift's taxable
year starting after December 31, 1995, or, if the thrift meets a loan
origination test, beginning up to two years later. The bank's accumulated
reserves since 1987 which are subject to recapture under this rule are $101.3
million. The tax liability related to the recapture of the bad debt reserves
accumulated since 1987 has been reflected in the bank's financial statements as
of September 30, 1998 and 1997.
Consolidated Tax Returns; Tax Sharing Payments. Generally, the operations of the
Trust have generated significant net operating losses. The bank's taxable
income in the current year was sufficient to fully utilize the current year tax
loss of the Trust. Under the terms of a tax sharing agreement dated June 28,
1990, as amended, the bank is obligated to make payments to the Trust based on
its taxable income, as explained more fully below. Under the terms of the bank's
board resolution, the bank is permitted to make tax sharing payments to the
Trust of up to $15.0 million relating to any fiscal year without OTS approval.
The tax sharing agreement generally provides that each member of the Trust's
affiliated group is required to pay the Trust an amount equal to 100% of the tax
liability that the member would have been required to pay to the IRS if the
member had filed on a separate return basis. These amounts generally must be
paid even if the affiliated group has no tax liability or the group's tax
liability is less than the sum of such amounts. Under the tax sharing agreement,
the Trust, in turn, is obligated to pay to the applicable tax authorities the
overall tax liability, if any, of the group. In addition, to the extent the net
operating losses or tax credits of a particular member reduce the overall tax
liability of the group, the Trust is required to reimburse such member on a
dollar-for-dollar basis, thereby compensating the member for the group's use of
its net operating losses or tax credits. Under the tax sharing agreement, the
bank and its subsidiaries are treated as a single member of the Trust's
affiliated group.
The bank made tax sharing payments of $5.6 million in fiscal 1998. The tax
sharing payments were conditioned on a pledge by the Trust of certain Trust or
other assets to secure certain of its obligations under the tax sharing
agreement. At September 30, 1998, the amount of tax sharing payments due to the
Trust from the bank was $6.6 million, which was paid subsequent to the fiscal
year end. It is expected that the bank will have taxable income in future years
and additional operating losses of the Trust will be utilized to reduce the
overall tax liability of the group which would otherwise arise from such taxable
income of the bank or from the taxable income of other members of the Trust's
affiliated group.
In general, if the bank has net operating losses or unused tax credits in any
taxable year, under the tax sharing agreement the Trust is obligated to
reimburse the bank in an amount generally equal to (1) the tax benefit to the
group of using such tax losses or unused tax credits in the group's consolidated
federal income tax return for such year, plus (2) to the extent such losses or
credits are not used by the group in such year, the amount of the tax refunds
which the bank would otherwise have been able to claim if it were not being
included in the consolidated federal income tax return of the group, but not in
excess of the net amount paid by the bank to the Trust pursuant to the tax
sharing agreement. There is no assurance that the Trust would be able to fulfill
this obligation. If the Trust did not make the reimbursement, the OTS could
attempt to characterize such nonpayment as an unsecured extension of credit by
the bank to the Trust which, as described above under "Holding Company
Regulation," is prohibited under current law. The tax sharing agreement itself
does not provide for any remedies upon a breach by any party of its obligations
under the agreement.
The bank, as a member of an affiliated group of corporations filing consolidated
income tax returns, is liable under the Internal Revenue Code for the group's
tax liability. Although the bank would be entitled to reimbursement under the
tax sharing agreement for income tax paid with respect to the income of other
members of the affiliated group, there can be no assurance that the Trust or
other members would be able to fulfill this obligation.
State Taxation
Maryland law does not allow the filing of consolidated income tax returns, and
thus the Trust and its subsidiaries, which includes the bank and its
subsidiaries, that are subject to Maryland income tax, are required to file
separately in Maryland. The Trust and its subsidiaries are also subject to
income taxes in other states, some of which allow or require combined or
consolidated filing. The Commonwealth of Virginia has concluded audits of the
consolidated state income tax returns of the Trust for the taxable years ended
September 30, 1991, September 30, 1992 and September 30, 1993. The audit
adjustments did not have a significant adverse effect on the Trust's reported
earnings.
BANKING
Regulation
Federal Home Loan Bank System. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Atlanta. The 12 FHLBs are administered by the Federal Housing Finance
Board, an independent agency within the executive branch of the federal
government. The FHLBs serve as a central credit facility for their members.
Their primary credit mission is to enhance the availability of residential
mortgages. From time to time, the bank obtains advances from the FHLB. At
September 30, 1998, the bank had outstanding advances from the FHLB of Atlanta
of $352.0 million. See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this
report and "Deposits and Other Sources of Funds Borrowings."
As a member of the FHLB of Atlanta, the bank is required to acquire and hold
shares of capital stock in that bank in an amount equal to the greater of:
o 1.0% of home mortgage loans, home-purchase contracts and similar
mortgage-related assets;
o 0.3% of total assets;
o $500; or
o 5.0% of outstanding advances.
Pursuant to this requirement, the bank had an investment of $49.0 million in
FHLB stock at September 30, 1998. The bank earned dividends of $2.4 million and
$2.0 million during the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1997.
Liquidity Requirements. The bank is required to maintain a daily average balance
of liquid assets, including cash, federal funds, certain time deposits, certain
bankers' acceptances, certain corporate debt securities and commercial paper,
securities of certain mutual funds, certain mortgage-related securities, certain
mortgage loans and U.S. Government, state government and federal agency
obligations, equal to a specified percentage of its average daily balance of
deposits, based upon the preceding quarter's average balances, plus borrowings,
or portions thereof, payable in one year or less. Effective November 24, 1997,
the OTS reduced the minimum liquidity requirement to 4.0% from 5.0% and changed
the reporting requirement to quarterly instead of monthly. If an institution's
liquid assets at any time do not at least equal, on an average daily basis for
the quarter, the amount required by the OTS, the institution could be subject to
various monetary penalties imposed by the OTS. At September 30, 1998, the bank
was in compliance with the liquidity requirement, with a liquid assets ratio of
10.4%.
Deposit Insurance Premiums. Under FDIC insurance regulations,
the bank is required to pay premiums to the Savings Association
Insurance Fund for insurance of its deposit accounts. The FDIC
utilizes a risk-based premium system in which an institution
pays premiums for deposit insurance on its SAIF-insured deposits
based on supervisory evaluations and on the institution's
capital category under the OTS's prompt corrective action
regulations. See "Prompt Corrective Action."
Although the FDIC insures commercial banks as well as thrifts, the insurance
funds for commercial banks and thrifts have been segregated into the bank
Insurance Fund and the SAIF. The FDIC is required to maintain the reserve levels
of both the BIF and the SAIF at 1.25% of insured deposits. As a result of a
one-time special assessment paid by thrift institutions pursuant to legislation
enacted in 1996 to recapitalize the SAIF, a prior differential between BIF and
SAIF assessment rates was eliminated and the rates for SAIF members are
identical to the rates for BIF members.
Beginning in 1997, commercial banks have been required to share in the payment
of interest due on Financing Corporation bonds used to provide liquidity to the
savings and loan industry in the 1980s. Annualized FICO assessments which were
added to deposit insurance premiums equaled 6.25 basis points for SAIF members
and 1.25 basis points for BIF members for the first semi-annual period of 1998
and 5.96 basis points for SAIF members and 1.192 basis points for BIF members
for the second semi-annual period of 1998. This differential is expected to
remain in effect through December 31, 1999, after which BIF and SAIF members
will pay identical FICO assessments, which are expected to be approximately 2.4
basis points. Thus, the bank and other institutions with SAIF-assessable
deposits will continue to pay somewhat higher deposit insurance premiums than
institutions with BIF-assessable deposits, which could lead to a competitive
disadvantage in the pricing of loans and deposits.
SAIF insurance may be terminated by the FDIC, after notice and a 30-day
corrective period, upon a finding by the FDIC that the institution has engaged
in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue
operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or
condition imposed by the FDIC. The 30-day period may be eliminated by the FDIC
with the approval of the OTS.
Regulatory Capital. Under OTS regulations implementing the capital requirements
imposed by FIRREA, savings institutions, such as the bank, are subject to a
minimum tangible capital requirement, a minimum core or leverage capital
requirement, and a minimum total risk-based capital requirement. Each of these
requirements generally must be no less stringent than the capital standards for
national banks. At September 30, 1998, the bank's tangible, core and total
risk-based regulatory capital ratios were 7.93%, 7.93% and 20.70%, compared to
the minimum requirements under FIRREA of 1.50%, 3.00% and 8.00% in effect at
that date.
Under FIRREA's minimum leverage ratio, Chevy Chase must maintain a ratio of core
capital to tangible assets of not less than 3.0%. However, under the OTS prompt
corrective action regulations, an institution that is not in the highest
supervisory category must maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0% to be
considered an adequately capitalized institution. See "Prompt Corrective
Action."
In October 1997, the OTS proposed amendments to its FIRREA capital regulations
that would establish a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0% for institutions not in
the highest supervisory category. Core capital generally includes common
shareholders' equity, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority
interests in consolidated subsidiaries, less investments in certain subsidiaries
and certain intangible assets.
Prior to October 1, 1998, under interim guidance issued by the OTS, mortgage and
non-mortgage servicing assets and purchased credit card relationships could be
included up to an aggregate amount of 50% of core capital and PCCRs and
non-mortgage servicing assets were also subject to a sublimit of 25% of core
capital. For these purposes, servicing assets and PCCRs are valued at the lesser
of 90% of fair market value or 100% of the current unamortized book value. At
September 30, 1998, the bank had qualifying servicing assets of $27.0 million,
which constituted 5.1% of core capital at that date, and had no PCCRs.
Effective October 1, 1998, the OTS and the other federal bank regulatory
agencies amended their regulatory capital requirements relating to servicing
assets. The final rule increases the maximum amount of mortgage and non-mortgage
servicing assets and PCCRs that can be included in Tier 1 capital from 50% to
100%. PCCRs and non-mortgage servicing assets are still subject to a sublimit of
25% of core capital.
Deductions from capital apply for investments in, and loans to, subsidiaries
engaged in activities not permissible for national banks, for equity investments
that are not permissible for national banks and for the portion of land loans
and non-residential construction loans in excess of an 80% loan-to-value ratio.
The tangible capital requirement adopted by the OTS requires a savings
institution to maintain tangible capital in an amount not less than 1.5% of
tangible assets, which is the minimum ratio required by FIRREA. Tangible capital
is defined as core capital less investments in certain subsidiaries and any
intangible assets, including supervisory goodwill, plus qualifying servicing
assets valued at the amount includable in core capital.
The risk-based capital requirements issued by the OTS provide that the capital
ratio applicable to an asset is adjusted to reflect the degree of credit risk
associated with that asset and that the asset base for computing a savings
institution's capital requirement includes off-balance-sheet assets. Capital
must be maintained against assets sold with recourse despite the fact that the
assets are accounted for as having been sold.
Pursuant to OTS's capital requirements, the bank maintains dollar-for-dollar
capital against the securitized assets in an amount equal to:
o the amounts on deposit in spread accounts;
o the amount of any interest-only strips relating to the
securitized assets; and
o certain other items representing recourse for regulatory capital purposes, up
to the otherwise applicable capital requirement on the underlying loans.
The OTS and the other federal bank regulatory agencies have proposed revisions
to their risk-based capital regulations to address the regulatory capital
treatment of recourse obligations and direct credit substitutes involving
exposure to credit risk.
The proposal:
o would define recourse to include, among other things, providing credit
enhancement beyond any contractual obligation to support assets sold and
providing representations and warranties other than those that relate to an
existing state of facts that the seller can either control or verify with
reasonable due diligence at the time the assets are sold;
o would treat direct credit substitutes and recourse
obligations consistently; and
o would use credit ratings and possibly certain other alternative approaches to
match the risk-based capital assessment more closely to an institution's
relative risk of loss in asset securitizations.
The agencies intend that any final rules adopted in connection with the proposal
that result in increased risk-based capital requirements for an institution will
apply only to transactions consummated after the effective date of any final
rules.
There are currently four categories of risk-weightings: 0% for cash and similar
assets, 20% for qualifying mortgage-backed securities, 50% for qualifying
residential permanent real estate loans and 100% for other assets, including
consumer loans, commercial real estate loans and loans more than 90 days past
due and for real estate acquired in settlement of loans. Savings institutions
generally are required to maintain risk-based capital equal to 8.0% of
risk-weighted assets, with at least half of that amount in the form of core
capital.
A savings institution's supplementary capital may be used to satisfy the
risk-based capital requirement only to the extent of the institution's core
capital. Supplementary capital includes cumulative perpetual preferred stock,
qualifying non-perpetual preferred stock, qualifying subordinated debt,
nonwithdrawable accounts and pledged deposits, and allowances for loan and lease
losses up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. At September 30, 1998,
the bank had $53.0 million in allowances for general loan and lease losses, all
of which was includable as supplementary capital.
Subordinated debt may be included in supplementary capital with OTS approval
subject to a phase-out based on its remaining term to maturity. The phase-out
established for such maturing capital instruments by the OTS permits an
institution to include such instruments in supplementary capital under one of
two phase-out options: (1) at the beginning of each of the last five years prior
to the maturity date of the instrument, the institution may reduce the amount
eligible to be included by 20% of the original amount or (2) the institution may
include only the aggregate amount of maturing capital instruments that mature in
any one year during the seven years immediately prior to an instrument's
maturity that does not exceed 20% of the institution's capital.
Once an institution selects either the first or second option, it must continue
to select the same option for all subsequent issuances of maturing capital
instruments as long as there is any outstanding balance of such instruments for
which an option has been selected. At September 30, 1998, the bank had $250.0
million in maturing subordinated capital instruments, all of which was
includable as supplementary capital. Of that amount, $150.0 million matures in
2005 and $100.0 million matures in 2008. See "Deposits and Other Sources of
Funds - Borrowings."
The OTS has indefinitely delayed implementation of an interest-rate risk
component of its risk-based capital regulation. Under that component, an
institution that would experience a change in portfolio equity in an amount in
excess of 2.0% of the institution's assets as a result of a 200 basis point
increase or decrease in the general level of interest rates would be required to
maintain additional amounts of risk-based capital based on the lowest interest
rate exposure at the end of the three previous quarters. At September 30, 1998,
the bank would not have been required to maintain additional amounts of
risk-based capital had the interest-rate risk component of the capital
regulations been in effect.
The OTS also considers concentration of credit risk and risks arising from
non-traditional activities, as well as a thrift's ability to manage these risks,
in evaluating whether the thrift should be subject to an individual minimum
capital requirement.
OTS regulations contain special rules affecting savings institutions with
certain kinds of subsidiaries. For purposes of determining compliance with each
of the capital standards, a savings institution's investments in, and extensions
of credit to, subsidiaries engaged in activities not permissible for a national
bank, also known as "non-includable subsidiaries," are, with certain exceptions,
deducted from the savings institution's capital. At September 30, 1998,
investments in non-includable subsidiaries were fully deducted from all three
FIRREA capital requirements. All or a portion of the assets of each of a savings
institution's subsidiaries are generally consolidated with the assets of the
savings institution for regulatory capital purposes unless all of the savings
institution's investments in, and extensions of credit to, such subsidiary are
deducted from capital. Chevy Chase's real estate development subsidiaries are
its only subsidiaries engaged in activities not permissible for a national bank.
At September 30, 1998, the bank's investments in, and extensions of credit to,
its non-includable subsidiaries totaled approximately $4.1 million, of which
$3.9 million constituted a deduction from tangible capital.
OTS capital regulations also require the 100% deduction from total capital of
all equity investments that are not permissible for national banks and the
portion of land loans and non-residential construction loans in excess of an 80%
loan-to-value ratio. The bank's equity investments at September 30, 1998 were
certain properties classified as real estate held for sale which the bank has
agreed to treat as equity investments for regulatory capital purposes. At
September 30, 1998, the book value of these properties after subsequent
valuation allowances, was $11.7 million, of which $11.1 million was required to
be deducted from total capital. The bank had no land loans or non-residential
construction loans with loan-to-value ratios greater than 80% at September 30,
1998. The bank has $0.8 million of general valuation allowances maintained
against its non-includable subsidiaries and equity investments which, pursuant
to OTS guidelines, are available as a credit against the deductions from capital
otherwise required.
OTS capital regulations provide a five-year holding period, or such longer
period as may be approved by the OTS, for real estate acquired in settlement of
loans to qualify for an exception from treatment as an equity investment. If an
REO property is considered an equity investment, its then-current book value is
deducted from total risk-based capital. Accordingly, if the bank is unable to
dispose of any REO property prior to the end of its applicable five-year holding
period and is unable to obtain an extension of such five-year holding period
from the OTS, the bank could be required to deduct the then-current book value
of such REO property from risk-based capital. In February 1998, the bank
received from the OTS extensions through February 17, 1999 of the holding
periods for certain of its REO properties acquired through foreclosure in fiscal
1990, 1991 and 1992. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Financial Condition Capital."
The bank's ability to maintain capital compliance is dependent on a number of
factors, including, for example, general economic conditions and the condition
of local real estate markets. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition - Capital."
The OTS has the authority to require an institution to maintain capital at
levels above the minimum levels generally required, but has not taken any such
action with respect to the bank.
Prompt Corrective Action. Pursuant to FDICIA, the OTS and the other federal
agencies regulating financial institutions have adopted regulations which apply
to every FDIC- insured commercial bank and thrift institution a system of
mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions which generally become more
severe as the capital levels of an individual institution decline. The
regulations establish five capital categories to which institutions are assigned
for purposes of determining their treatment under these prompt corrective action
provisions.
An institution is categorized as well capitalized under the regulations if it
(A) has a leverage ratio of at least 5.0%, a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of
at least 6.0% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%, and (B) is
not subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive or prompt
corrective action directive issued by the OTS to meet and maintain a specific
capital level. An institution is considered adequately capitalized if such
capital ratios are at least 4.0%, or3.0% if rated in the highest supervisory
category, 4.0% and 8.0%. An institution with a leverage ratio below 4.0%, or
3.0% if rated in the highest supervisory category, a tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio below 4.0% or a total risk-based capital ratio below 8.0% is considered
undercapitalized and an institution with ratios under 3.0%, 3.0% or 6.0% is
considered significantly undercapitalized.
Finally, an institution is considered critically undercapitalized, and subject
to provisions mandating appointment of a conservator or receiver, if its ratio
of tangible equity, which is generally defined by the OTS as core capital plus
cumulative perpetual preferred stock, to total assets is 2.0% or less. An
institution's classification category could be downgraded if, after notice and
an opportunity for a hearing, the OTS determined that the institution is in an
unsafe or unsound condition or has received and has not corrected a less than
satisfactory examination rating for asset quality, management, earnings or
liquidity.
At September 30, 1998, the bank's leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total
risk-based regulatory capital ratios were 7.93%, 12.93% and 20.70% which
exceeded the minimum ratios established for well capitalized institutions.
Board Resolution. At the request of the OTS, the board of directors of the bank
adopted a resolution in March 1996 which, among other things, permits the bank:
(1) to make tax sharing payments without OTS approval to the B.F. Saul Real
Estate Investment Trust, which owns 80% of the bank's Common Stock, of up to
$15.0 million relating to any single fiscal year; and (2) to declare dividends
on its stock in any quarterly period up to the lesser of (A) 50% of its after
tax net income for the immediately preceding quarter or (B) 50% of the average
quarterly after tax net income for the immediately preceding four quarter
period, minus, in either case, dividends declared on the bank's preferred stock
during that quarterly period. The resolution also provides that the bank will
present a plan annually to the OTS detailing anticipated consumer loan
securitization activity.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. Insured savings institutions like the bank must
meet a QTL test to avoid imposition of certain restrictions. The QTL test
requires thrifts to maintain a thrift investment percentage equal to a minimum
of 65%. The numerator of such percentage is the thrift's qualified thrift
investments and the denominator is the thrift's portfolio assets. Portfolio
assets is defined as total assets minus:
o the thrift's premises and equipment used to conduct its
business;
o liquid assets, as defined up to 20 percent of total assets;
and
o intangible assets, including goodwill.
The QTL test must be met on a monthly average basis in nine out of every 12
months. The bank had 86.7% of its assets invested in qualified thrift
investments at September 30, 1998, and met the QTL test in each of the previous
12 months.
A thrift's qualified thrift investments consist of residential housing loans,
including home equity loans and manufactured housing loans, mortgage-backed
securities, FHLB and Federal National Mortgage Association stock, small business
loans, credit card and educational loans. Portions of other assets are also
includable, provided that the total of these assets does not exceed 20% of
portfolio assets. Assets in this category include consumer loans other than
credit card and educational loans, 50% of residential housing loans originated
and sold within 90 days, investments in real estate-oriented service
corporations, 200% of mortgage loans for residences, churches, schools, nursing
homes and small businesses in areas with unmet credit needs. Intangible assets,
including goodwill, are specifically excluded from qualified thrift investments.
An institution that fails to meet the QTL test is subject to significant
penalties. Immediately after an institution ceases to meet the QTL test, it:
o may not make any new investment or engage directly or indirectly in any other
new activity unless the investment or activity would be permissible for a
national bank;
o may not establish any new branch office at any location at which a national
bank could not establish a branch office;
o may not obtain new advances from the applicable FHLB; and
o may not pay dividends beyond the amounts permissible if it were a national
bank.
One year following an institution's failure to meet the test, the institution's
holding company parent must register and be subject to supervision as a bank
holding company. Three years after failure to meet the QTL test, an institution
may not retain any investments or engage in any activities that would be
impermissible for a national bank, and must repay any outstanding FHLB advances
as promptly as possible consistent with the safe and sound operation of the
institution. Failure to meet the QTL test also could limit the bank's ability to
establish and maintain branches outside of its home state of Virginia.
Because Chevy Chase is engaged in activities that are not currently permissible
for national banks, such as investing in subsidiaries that engage in real estate
development activities, failure to satisfy the QTL test would require Chevy
Chase to terminate these activities and divest itself of any prohibited assets
held at such time. Based on a review of the bank's current activities,
management of the bank believes that compliance with these restrictions would
not have a significant adverse effect on the bank. In addition, because the
Trust is engaged in real estate ownership and development, which are activities
that are currently prohibited for bank holding companies, failure by Chevy Chase
to meet the QTL test, in the absence of a significant restructuring of the
Trust's operations, would, in effect, require the Trust to reduce its ownership
of Chevy Chase to a level at which it no longer would be deemed to control the
bank.
The bank has taken, and will continue to take, steps to meet the QTL test by
structuring its balance sheet to include the required percentage of qualified
thrift investments.
Dividends and Other Capital Distributions. Under OTS regulations, the ability of
thrift institutions such as the bank to make capital distributions, which are
defined to include payment of dividends, stock repurchases, cash-out mergers and
other distributions charged against the capital accounts of an institution,
varies depending primarily on the institution's earnings and regulatory capital
levels. The regulations do not apply to interest or principal payments on debt,
including interest or principal payments on the bank's outstanding subordinated
debentures.
Institutions are divided into two tiers for purposes of these regulations. Tier
1 institutions are those in compliance with their capital requirements and which
have not been notified by the OTS that they are in need of more than normal
supervision. Tier 1 institutions may make capital distributions without
regulatory approval in amounts up to the greater of (A) 100% of net income for
the calendar year to date, plus up to one-half of the institution's surplus
capital, defined as the excess of capital over the fully phased-in requirements,
at the beginning of the calendar year in which the distribution is made, or (B)
75% of net income for the most recent four quarters. Tier 1 institutions that
make capital distributions under the foregoing rules must continue to meet the
applicable capital requirements on a pro forma basis after giving effect to such
distributions. Tier 1 institutions may seek OTS approval to pay dividends beyond
these amounts.
The definition of Tier 2 institutions is no longer applicable because all
deductions from capital requirements have been fully phased-in as of July 1,
1996. All institutions are classified as either Tier 1 or Tier 3 institutions
since that date.
Tier 3 institutions have capital levels below their current required minimum
levels and may not make any capital distributions without the prior written
approval of the OTS.
At September 30, 1998, the bank had sufficient levels of capital to be a Tier 1
institution for purposes of the capital distribution regulation. However, the
OTS retains discretion under its capital distribution regulation to treat an
institution that is notified in writing that it is in need of more than normal
supervision as a Tier 2 or Tier 3 institution.
The OTS retains general discretion to prohibit any otherwise permitted capital
distributions on general safety and soundness grounds and must be given 30 days
advance notice of all capital distributions. The OTS has approved the payment of
dividends on the bank's outstanding 13% Noncumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock,
Series A, referred to in this report as the "13% Preferred Stock," provided
that:
o immediately after giving effect to the dividend payment, the bank's core and
risk-based regulatory capital ratios would not be less than 4.0% and 8.0%;
o dividends are earned and payable in accordance with the OTS
capital distribution regulation; and
o the bank continues to make progress in the disposition and reduction of its
non-performing loans and real estate owned.
Although the bank believes that dividends paid on the 10 3/8% Noncumulative
Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A, referred to in this report as the
"REIT Preferred Stock," issued by Chevy Chase Preferred Capital Corporation, or
the "REIT subsidiary," should not be considered capital distributions for this
purpose, there can be no assurances that the OTS would agree with this position.
Without addressing the issue of whether dividends on the REIT Preferred Stock
are capital distributions subject to the regulations, the OTS has indicated that
it would not object to the REIT subsidiary's payment of quarterly dividends on
the REIT Preferred Stock in an amount up to the amount of the REIT subsidiary's
net income for that quarter. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition Capital."
The REIT subsidiary currently expects that its net income will be in excess of
amounts needed to pay dividends on the REIT Preferred Stock. However, dividends
paid on the REIT Preferred Stock in excess of the REIT subsidiary's net income
could be treated as capital distributions by the OTS, in which case the REIT
subsidiary's payment of such dividends would be subject to restrictions under
the OTS capital distribution regulations. Moreover, if dividends on the REIT
Preferred Stock were treated as capital distributions, they would be included,
together with dividends paid on the 13% Preferred Stock and the common stock of
the bank, in calculating the amount of capital distributions that could be paid
by the bank without obtaining OTS approval.
In January 1998, the OTS proposed to amend its capital distribution regulations.
The proposal would expand the definition of capital distribution to include
repurchases of subordinated debt and requested comment on whether to treat
dividends paid by an operating subsidiary such as the REIT subsidiary as capital
distributions. Under the proposal, the bank would be required to file an
application with the OTS to make any capital distribution regardless of its size
if the bank did not qualify for expedited treatment under OTS regulations. If
the bank qualified for expedited treatment, an application would be required
only if the total amount of all of the bank's capital distributions for the year
exceeded the sum of the bank's net income for the year and the retained net
income for the previous two years. However, as is the case under current OTS
regulations, a notice would be required for any capital distribution because the
bank is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company.
In considering an application or notice, the proposal provides that the OTS will
not permit a capital distribution if:
o the bank would be undercapitalized following the
distribution;
o the capital distribution raises safety and soundness
concerns; or
o the capital distribution violates any statute, regulation, agreement with the
OTS, or condition imposed by the OTS.
In May 1988, in connection with the merger of a Virginia thrift into the bank,
the B.F. Saul Company and the Trust entered into a capital maintenance agreement
in which they agreed not to cause the bank without prior written approval of its
federal regulator to pay dividends in any fiscal year in excess of 50% of the
bank's net income for that fiscal year, provided that any dividends permitted
under such limitation could be deferred and paid in a subsequent year. However,
under both the current and the proposed OTS capital distribution rule, with the
approval of the OTS, the bank could substitute the requirements of the OTS
capital distribution rule for any more stringent requirements imposed on it by a
previous written agreement.
The bank is subject to other limitations on its ability to pay dividends. The
indenture pursuant to which $150 million principal amount of the bank's 9 1/4%
Subordinated Debentures due 2005 was issued in 1993 provides that the bank may
not pay dividends on its capital stock unless, after giving effect to the
dividend, no event of a continuing default shall have occurred and the bank is
in compliance with its regulatory capital requirements. In addition, the amount
of the proposed dividend may not exceed the sum of:
o $15 million;
o 66 2/3% of the bank's consolidated net income accrued on a cumulative basis
commencing on October 1, 1993; and
o the aggregate net cash proceeds received by the bank after October 1, 1993
from the sale of qualified capital stock or certain debt securities, minus
the aggregate amount of any restricted payments made by the bank.
Notwithstanding these restrictions on dividends, provided no event of default
has occurred or is continuing under the 1993 Indenture, the 1993 Indenture does
not restrict the payment of dividends on the 13% Preferred Stock or any
payment-in-kind preferred stock issued in lieu of cash dividends on the 13%
Preferred Stock or the redemption of any such payment-in-kind preferred stock.
The indenture pursuant to which $100 million principal amount of the bank's 1996
Debentures was issued provides that the proposed dividend may not exceed the sum
of the restrictions discussed above for the 1993 Indenture and the aggregate
liquidation preference of the bank's 10 3/8% Noncumulative Preferred Stock,
Series B, if issued in exchange for the outstanding REIT Preferred Stock. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Financial Condition - Capital and Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management."
At the request of the OTS, the Board of Directors of the bank adopted a
resolution which permits the bank to declare dividends on its stock in any
quarterly period up to the lesser of (1) 50% of its after tax net income for the
immediately preceding quarter or (2) 50% of the average quarterly after tax net
income for the immediately preceding four quarter period, minus, in either case,
dividends declared on the bank's 13% Preferred Stock during that quarterly
period.
The payment of any dividends on the bank's common stock and preferred stock will
be determined by the Board of Directors based on the bank's liquidity, asset
quality profile, capital adequacy and recent earnings history, as well as
economic conditions and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors,
including applicable government regulations and policies. See "Deposits and
Other Sources of Funds - Borrowings."
Lending Limits. With certain exceptions, the bank is prohibited from lending to
one borrower, including certain related entities of the borrower, amounts in
excess of 15% of the institution's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus,
plus an additional 10% for loans fully secured by readily marketable collateral.
The bank's regulatory loans-to-one-borrower limit was approximately $125.6
million at September 30, 1998, and no group relationships exceeded this limit at
that date.
Safety and Soundness Standards. The federal financial institution regulators
have developed standards to evaluate the operations of depository institutions,
as well as standards relating to asset quality, earnings and compensation. The
operational standards cover internal controls and audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and
employee compensation. An institution that fails to meet a standard that is
imposed through regulation may be required to submit a plan for corrective
action within 30 days. If a savings association fails to submit or implement an
acceptable plan, the OTS must order it to correct the deficiency, and may
restrict its rate of asset growth, prohibit asset growth entirely, require the
institution to increase its ratio of tangible equity to assets, restrict the
interest rate paid on deposits to the prevailing rates of interest on deposits
of comparable amounts and maturities, or require the institution to take any
other action the OTS determines will better carry out the purpose of prompt
corrective action. Imposition of these sanctions is within the discretion of the
OTS in most cases, but is mandatory if the savings institution commenced
operations or experienced a change in control during the 24 months preceding the
institution's failure to meet these standards, or underwent extraordinary growth
during the preceding 18 months.
The asset quality standards require that an insured depository institution
establish and maintain a system to identify problem assets and prevent
deterioration in those assets. The earnings standards require that an insured
depository institution establish and maintain a system to evaluate and monitor
earnings and ensure that earnings are sufficient to maintain adequate capital
and reserves.
Regulatory Assessments. The OTS imposes the following fees to
fund its operations:
o asset-based assessments for all savings institutions;
o examination fees for certain affiliates of savings
associations;
o application fees;
o securities filing fees; and
o publication fees. Of these fees, the semi-annual asset-based assessments,
which for the bank totaled $867,000 for the twelve-month period ending
December 31, 1998, are the most significant.
Effective January 1, 1999, the OTS will charge examination and supervisory
assessments based on a revised formula intended to more accurately reflect OTS's
estimates of the actual cost of examining and supervising an institution. Unlike
the current formula under which only institutions with a CAMELS rating of 4 or 5
pay a surcharge, the revised formula also will impose a surcharge on
institutions with a CAMELS rating of 3 and on complex institutions, which OTS
defines as any institution with significant amounts, over $1 billion, of certain
off-balance sheet assets, specifically, loans serviced for others, trust assets
and recourse obligations or direct credit substitutes. The bank anticipates that
its assessments will increase under the revised formula.
Other Regulations and Legislation. Chevy Chase must obtain prior approval of the
OTS before merging with another institution or before increasing its insured
accounts through merger, consolidation, purchase of assets or assumption of
liabilities. Also, as a SAIF-insured institution, the bank is subject to
limitations on its ability to buy or sell deposits from or to, or to combine
with, a BIF-insured institution. Despite these restrictions, SAIF-insured
thrifts may be acquired by banks or by bank holding companies under certain
circumstances.
The federal agencies regulating financial institutions possess broad enforcement
authority over the institutions they regulate, including the authority to impose
civil money penalties of up to $1 million per day for violations of laws and
regulations.
Federally chartered thrifts like Chevy Chase generally are permitted to
establish new branches anywhere in the United States, provided that they meet
the QTL test and their regulatory capital requirements and have at least a
satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act.
Amounts realized by the FDIC from the liquidation or other resolution of any
insured depository institution must be distributed to pay claims, other than
secured claims to the extent of any such security, in the following order of
priority:
o administrative expenses of the receiver;
o any deposit liability of the institution;
o any other general or senior liability of the
institution, which is not an obligation described in the next
two bullets;
o any obligation subordinated to depositors or general
creditors, which is not an obligation described in the next
bullet; and
o any obligation to stockholders arising as a result of their status as
stockholders.
The OTS and the other federal bank regulatory agencies have requested comment on
possible changes to the existing regulatory classification policies for retail
credit. Among the changes being considered are adoption of:
o a uniform charge-off policy for open-end and closed-end
credit;
o a charge-off policy for loans affected by bankruptcy, fraudulent activity,
and/or death of a borrower;
o a policy for treatment of partial payments;
o a prudent reaging policy for past due accounts; and
o a classification policy for delinquent residential mortgage and home equity
loans.
The bank is unable to predict at this time what, if any, changes will be made
to the existing policies.
Pending Legislation
Thrift Charter Legislation. Legislation passed in 1996 requires the merger of
the BIF and the SAIF into a single Deposit Insurance Fund on January 1, 1999,
but only if the thrift charter is eliminated by that date. Because the 105th
Congress did not enact legislation eliminating the thrift charter, no such
Merger took place on January 1, 1999. Although earlier versions of financial
modernization legislation considered by the 105th Congress would have required
federal thrifts, like the bank, to convert their charters to national or state
bank charters, the versions of the legislation passed by the House of
Representatives and by the Senate Banking Committee prior to adjournment would
not have required the bank to convert its charter.
If legislation requiring the bank to convert its charter were enacted and did
not contain appropriate grandfather provisions, such legislation could have an
adverse effect on the bank and the Trust because, among other things, the Trust
engages in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and
the regulatory capital and accounting treatment for banks and thrifts differs in
certain significant respects. The bank cannot determine at this time whether, or
in what form, such legislation may eventually be enacted, and there can be no
assurances that any such legislation that is enacted will contain adequate
grandfather rights for the bank or the Trust.
Federal Reserve System
The Federal Reserve Board requires depository institutions, including federal
savings banks, to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts and
certain non-personal deposit accounts. Because reserves generally must be
maintained in cash or non-interest-bearing accounts, the effect of the reserve
requirement is to decrease the bank's earning asset base. FRB regulations
generally require that reserves be maintained against net transaction accounts.
Prior to December 1, 1998, the first $4.7 million of a depository institution's
transaction accounts were subject to a 0% reserve requirement. The next $43.1
million in net transaction accounts were subject to a 3.0% reserve requirement
and any net transaction accounts over $47.8 million were subject to a 10.0%
reserve requirement. Effective December 1, 1998, the FRB increased the amount of
transaction accounts subject to a 0% reserve requirement from $4.7 million to
$4.9 million and decreased the low reserve tranche from $43.1 million to $41.6
million. The bank met its reserve requirements for each period during the year
ended September 30, 1998. The balances maintained to meet the reserve
requirements imposed by the FRB also may be used to satisfy liquidity
requirements which are imposed by the OTS.
Savings institutions may borrow from the FRB discount window, although FRB
regulations require these institutions to exhaust all reasonable alternate
sources of funds, including FHLB sources, before borrowing from the FRB. FDICIA
imposes additional limitations on the ability of the FRB to lend to
undercapitalized institutions through the discount window.
Community Reinvestment Act
Under the CRA and the OTS's regulations, a savings association has a continuing
and affirmative obligation to help meet the credit needs of its local
communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with
the safe and sound operation of the institution. In connection with its
examination of a savings association, the OTS is required to assess the
institution's record in satisfying the intent of the CRA. In addition, the OTS
is required to take into account the institution's record of meeting the credit
needs of its community in determining whether to grant approval for certain
types of applications.
The bank is committed to fulfilling its CRA obligation by providing access to a
full range of credit-related products and services to all segments of its
community. Based on the last OTS examination covering the period from January
1995 through June 1997, the bank received an outstanding CRA rating, the highest
rating given by the OTS.
Institutions like the bank, with more than $250 million in assets, are evaluated
primarily on the basis of their lending and investment in, and provision of
services, to low- and moderate-income areas unless they request designation and
receive approval as wholesale or limited purpose institutions or have been
approved for evaluation under a strategic plan.
In August 1994, Chevy Chase and its subsidiary, B. F. Saul Mortgage Company,
entered into an agreement with the United States Department of Justice which
committed them to continue the types of lending practices, branching strategies
and promotional programs that are designed to increase the level of banking
services available to traditionally underserved areas of the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area. Specifically, Chevy Chase and B.F. Saul Mortgage Company
agreed to invest $11.0 million in the African-American community of the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area over a five-year period. This commitment
obligated Chevy Chase and B.F. Saul Mortgage Company to:
o provide $7.0 million over the five-year period in subsidies for below- market
mortgage loans to residents of designated majority African-American
neighborhoods in Washington, D.C.
and Prince George's County, Maryland;
o open two additional mortgage offices in majority
African-American neighborhoods in the metropolitan
Washington, D.C. area; and
o open one new deposit branch in the Anacostia area of Washington, D.C.
Chevy Chase and B.F. Saul Mortgage Company also agreed over the same five-year
period, among other things, to continue efforts to increase their promotional
efforts targeted to residents of African-American neighborhoods, to continue
efforts to recruit African-Americans for loan production positions, and to
continue various employee training programs. Chevy Chase and B.F. Saul Mortgage
Company view these efforts as continuations of their existing programs.
Other Aspects of Federal Law
The bank is also subject to federal statutory provisions covering other items,
including security procedures, currency transactions reporting, insider and
affiliated party transactions, management interlocks, truth-in-lending,
electronic funds transfers, funds availability and equal credit opportunity.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income was issued in June 1997 and
establishes accounting standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive
income and its components in a full set of general-purpose financial statements.
SFAS 130 requires that all items that are required to be recognized under
accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a
financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other
financial statements. SFAS 130 also requires an enterprise to classify items of
other comprehensive income by their nature in a financial statement and to
display the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from
retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of a
statement of financial position. SFAS 130 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1997. Because SFAS 130 addresses only disclosure
related issues, its adoption will not have an impact on the bank's financial
condition or its results of operations.
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, was also issued in June 1997. SFAS 131 establishes accounting
standards for the way business enterprises report information about operating
segments in annual and interim financial reports issued to shareholders. It also
establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services,
geographic areas and major customers. SFAS 131 requires that a business
enterprise report financial and descriptive information, including profit or
loss, certain specific revenue and expense items, and segment assets, about its
reportable operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of
an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is
evaluated regularly by management in deciding how to allocate resources and in
assessing performance. SFAS 131 is effective for financial statements for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 1997. Because SFAS 131 addresses only
disclosure related issues, its adoption will not have an impact on the bank's
financial condition or its results of operations.
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, was
issued in June 1998 and establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires that an entity
recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of
financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. SFAS 133 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. The impact of SFAS 133
on the bank's financial statements has not yet been determined.
SFAS No. 134, Accounting for Mortgage-Backed Securities Retained After the
Securitization of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale by a Mortgage Banking Enterprise,
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 65, was issued in October 1Mortgage Banking
Activities to require that after the securitization of mortgage loans held for
sale, an entity engaged in mortgage banking activities classify the resulting
mortgage-backed securities or other retained interests based on its ability and
intent to sell or hold those investments. SFAS 134 conforms the subsequent
accounting for securities retained after the securitization of mortgage loans by
a mortgage banking enterprise with the subsequent accounting for securities
retained after the securitization of other types of assets by a nonmortgage
banking enterprise. SFAS 134 is effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning
after December 15, 1998.
Market Area
The bank's principal deposit and lending markets are located in the Washington,
D.C. metropolitan area. Service industries and federal, state and local
governments employ a significant portion of the Washington, D.C. area labor
force, while a substantial number of the nation's 500 largest corporations have
some presence in the area. The Washington, D.C. area's seasonally unadjusted
unemployment rate is generally below the national rate and was 3.3% in September
1998, compared to the national rate of 4.4%.
Chevy Chase historically has relied on retail deposits originated in its branch
network as its primary funding source. See "Deposits and Other Sources of
Funds." Chevy Chase's principal market for deposits consists of Montgomery and
Prince George's Counties in Maryland and Fairfax County in Virginia.
Approximately 13.3% of the bank's deposits at September 30, 1998 were obtained
from depositors residing outside of Maryland and Northern Virginia. Chevy Chase
had the largest market share of deposits in Montgomery County, and ranked third
in market share of deposits in Prince George's County at June 30, 1997,
according to the most recently published industry statistics. The per capita
income of each of Montgomery and Fairfax Counties ranks among the highest of
counties and equivalent jurisdictions nationally. These two counties are also
the Washington, D.C. area's largest suburban employment centers, with a
substantial portion of their labor force consisting of federal, state and local
government employees. Private employment is concentrated in services and retail
trade centers. The unemployment rates in Montgomery and Fairfax Counties in
September 1998, 2.4% and 1.9%, were below the national rate of 4.4% and those of
Maryland and Virginia ,4.3% and 3.2%, for the same month.
The bank historically has concentrated its lending activities in
the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. See "Lending
Activities."
Investment and Other Securities
The bank is required by OTS regulations to maintain a specific minimum amount of
liquid assets and short-term liquid assets invested in certain qualifying types
of investments. See "Regulation - Liquidity Requirements." To meet these
requirements, the bank maintains a portfolio of cash, federal funds and
mortgage-backed securities with final maturities of five years or less. The
balance of investments in excess of regulatory requirements reflects
management's objective of maintaining liquidity at a level sufficient to assure
adequate funds to meet expected and unexpected balance sheet fluctuations.
The bank classifies its investment and mortgage-backed securities as either
held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading at the time such securities are
acquired. All investment securities and mortgage-backed securities are
classified as held-to-maturity at September 30, 1998 and 1997.
As part of its mortgage banking activities, the bank exchanges loans held for
sale for mortgage-backed securities and then sells the mortgage-backed
securities, which are classified as trading securities, to third party investors
in the month of issuance. Gains and losses on sales of trading securities are
determined using the specific identification method. There were no
mortgage-backed securities classified as trading securities at September 30,
1998 and 1997.
At September 30, 1998 and 1997, the bank held automobile receivables-backed
securities which were classified as trading securities. These securities were
established in conjunction with two automobile loan securitization transactions
and represent subordinate classes of certificates retained by the bank.
Lending Activities
Loan Portfolio Composition. At September 30, 1998, the bank's loan portfolio
totaled $2.8 billion, which represented 41.2% of its total assets. It should be
noted that all references in this report to the bank's loan portfolio refer to
loans, whether they are held for sale and/or securitization or for investment,
and exclude mortgage-backed securities. Loans collateralized by single-family
residences constituted 70.6% of the loan portfolio at that date.
The following table sets forth information concerning the bank's loan portfolio,
net of unfunded commitments, for the periods indicated.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Loan Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------------
% of % of % of % of % of
Balance Total Balance Total Balance Total Balance Total Balance Total
----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- -------- ----------- -------- ----------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family
residential (1) $ 1,821,982 65.7 % $ 849,955 33.2 % $ 1,601,483 47.2 % $ 1,391,694 47.3 % $ 1,369,571 53.7%
Home equity (1) 135,122 4.9 94,088 3.7 32,052 0.9 29,024 1.0 34,708 1.4
Commercial real estate
and multifamily 74,164 2.7 53,551 2.1 78,866 2.3 85,781 2.9 84,210 3.3
Real estate
construction and
ground 108,379 3.9 54,998 2.2 63,907 1.9 32,652 1.1 52,350 2.1
Commercial 174,076 6.3 98,346 3.9 57,023 1.7 13,986 0.5 3,950 0.2
Credit card (1) -- -- 1,077,149 42.3 1,118,271 33.0 1,012,548 34.4 650,199 25.5
Automobile (1) 357,826 12.9 229,868 9.0 301,066 9.0 239,217 8.1 289,346 11.4
Home improvement and
related loans (1) 67,355 2.4 55,453 2.2 99,192 2.9 112,705 3.8 37,526 1.5
Overdraft lines of
credit and
other consumer 33,484 1.2 36,029 1.4 37,954 1.1 26,206 0.9 25,375 0.9
----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- -------- ----------- -------- ----------- ------
2,772,388 100.0 % 2,549,437 100.0 % 3,389,814 100.0 % 2,943,813 100.0 % 2,547,235 100.0%
----------- ========= ----------- ======== ----------- ======== ----------- ======== ----------- ======
Less:
Unearned premiums
and discounts -- 449 836 1,103 1,438
Deferred loan
origination
fees (costs) (3,013) (2,339) (13,958) (13,687) (10,604)
Allowance for loan
losses 60,157 105,679 95,523 60,496 50,205
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
57,144 103,789 82,401 47,912 41,039
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total loans
receivable $ 2,715,244 $ 2,445,648 $ 3,307,413 $ 2,895,901 $ 2,506,196
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Includes loans held for sale and/or securitization, if any.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The bank adjusts the composition of its loan portfolio in response to a variety
of factors, including regulatory requirements and asset and liability management
objectives. In addition, the composition of the bank's loan portfolio as of
September 30, 1998 was significantly affected by the sale of the bank's credit
card portfolio on that date. See "Regulation - Regulatory Capital," "Qualified
Thrift Lender Test" and "Federal Taxation - Bad Debt Reserve" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Financial Condition - Asset and Liability Management."
Contractual Principal Repayments of Loans. The following table shows the
scheduled contractual principal repayments of the bank's loans at September 30,
1998. The entire balance of loans held for sale and/or securitization is shown
in the year ending September 30, 1999, because such loans are expected to be
sold in less than one year.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Contractual Principal Repayments
(In thousands)
Approximate Principal Repayments
Principal Due in Years Ending September 30,
Balance
Outstanding at ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 30, 2014 and
1998 (1) 1999 2000 2001 2002-2003 2004-2008 2009-2013 Thereafter
------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family residential $ 1,772,784 $ 23,377 $ 24,982 $ 26,482 $ 49,758 $ 170,039 $ 379,357 $ 1,098,789
Home equity 135,122 643 1,483 237 245 7,230 11,262 114,022
Commercial real estate and
multifamily 74,164 469 10,728 12,338 21,343 27,365 1,921 --
Real estate construction
and ground 108,379 63,245 8,729 23,090 13,315 -- -- --
Commercial 174,076 79,972 9,510 12,647 17,733 48,654 5,294 266
Automobile 232,826 37,997 43,341 49,563 101,925 -- -- --
Home improvement and
related loans 60,570 2,343 2,632 2,956 7,045 26,727 18,867 --
Overdraft lines of credit
and other consumer 33,484 3,187 3,744 4,411 11,377 10,765 -- --
Loans held for sale 55,983 55,983 -- -- -- -- -- --
Loans held for
securitization and sale 125,000 125,000 -- -- -- -- -- --
------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------- -----------
Total loans receivable (2) $ 2,772,388 $ 392,216 $ 105,149 $ 131,724 $ 222,741 $ 290,780 $ 416,701 $ 1,213,077
============= =========== ============ =========== ============= ============ ============= ===========
Fixed-rate loans $ 1,592,388 $ 69,360 $ 68,423 $ 81,645 $ 166,858 $ 175,992 $ 316,345 $ 713,765
Adjustable-rate loans 999,017 141,873 36,726 50,079 55,883 114,788 100,356 499,312
Loans held for sale 55,983 55,983 -- -- -- -- -- --
Loans held for
securitization and sale 125,000 125,000 -- -- -- -- -- --
------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------- -----------
Total loans receivable (2) $ 2,772,388 $ 392,216 $ 105,149 $ 131,724 $ 222,741 $ 290,780 $ 416,701 $ 1,213,077
============= =========== ============ =========== ============= ============ ============= ===========
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Of the total amount of loans outstanding at September 30, 1998 which were
due after one year, an aggregate principal balance of approximately $1.5 billion
had fixed interest rates and an aggregate principal balance of approximately
$857.1 million had adjustable interest rates.
(2) Before deduction of allowance for loan losses, unearned premiums and
discounts and deferred loan origination fees (costs).
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Actual payments may not reflect scheduled contractual principal repayments due
to the effect of loan refinancings, prepayments and enforcement of due-on-sale
clauses, which give the bank the right to declare a conventional loan -- one
that is neither insured by the Federal Housing Administration nor
partially guaranteed by the Veterans' Administration -- immediately due
and payable in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells the real
property subject to the mortgage and the loan is not repaid. Although the bank's
single- family residential loans historically have had stated maturities of
generally 30 years, such loans normally have remained outstanding for
substantially shorter periods because of these factors. At September 30, 1998,
principal repayments of $211.0 million are contractually due within the next
year. Of this amount, $69.1 million is contractually due on fixed-rate loans and
$141.9 million is contractually due on adjustable-rate loans.
Origination, Purchase and Sale of Real Estate Loans. As a federally chartered
savings institution, the bank has general authority to make loans secured by
real estate located throughout the United States. The following table shows
changes in the composition of the bank's real estate loan portfolio and the net
change in mortgage-backed securities.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Origination, Purchase and Sale of Real Estate Loans
(In thousands)
For the Year Ended September 30,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate loan originations and purchases: (1)
Single family residential $ 2,814,171 $ 1,438,333 $ 1,067,153
Home equity 448,071 259,999 152,953
Commercial real estate and multifamily 21,184 29 345
Real estate construction and ground 126,295 64,430 72,655
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total originations and purchases 3,409,721 1,762,791 1,293,106
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Principal repayments (348,676) (501,190) (279,518)
Sales (2) (423,078) (413,645) (407,201)
Loans transferred to real estate acquired
in settlement of loans (4,938) (4,706) (5,973)
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
(776,692) (919,541) (692,692)
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Transfers to mortgage-backed securities (3) (1,545,974) (1,566,966) (363,257)
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Increase (decrease) in real estate loans $ 1,087,055 $ (723,716) $ 237,157
================ ================ ===============
(1) Excludes unfunded commitments.
(2) Includes securitization and sale of home equity receivables of $298.8
million, $170.6 million and $96.5 million for the years ended September 30,
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
(3) Represents real estate loans which were pooled and exchanged for
mortgage-backed securities.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Single-Family Residential Real Estate Lending. The bank originates a variety of
loans secured by single-family residential structures. At September 30, 1998,
$2.0 billion, or 70.6%, of the bank's loan portfolio consisted of loans secured
by first or second mortgages on such properties, as compared to $944.0 million,
or 36.9%, at September 30, 1997. Of these amounts, $25.5 million and $13.4
million consisted of FHA-insured or VA-guaranteed loans at September 30, 1998
and 1997. Approximately 77.8% of the bank's single-family residential real
estate loans at September 30, 1998, by principal balance, were secured by
properties located in Maryland, Virginia or the District of Columbia.
The bank originates VA, FHA and a wide variety of conventional residential
mortgage loans through its wholly-owned mortgage banking subsidiary, B. F. Saul
Mortgage Company, and through Chevy Chase Mortgage, a division of the bank.
Chevy Chase currently offers fixed-rate loans with maturities of 10 to 30 years
and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans, principally with maturities of
30 years.
The bank maintains a wholesale network of correspondents, including loan brokers
and financial institutions, in order to supplement its direct origination of
single-family residential mortgage loans. The bank determines the specific loan
products and rates under which the correspondents originate the loans, and
subjects the loans to the bank's underwriting criteria and review. During the
year ended September 30, 1998, approximately $1.6 billion of loans settled under
the correspondent program.
Interest rates on the majority of the bank's ARMs are adjusted based on changes
in yields on U.S. Treasury securities of varying maturities. The interest rate
adjustment provisions of the bank's ARMs contain limitations on the frequency
and maximum amount of interest rate adjustments, although such limitations are
not required by law. These limitations are determined by a variety of factors,
including mortgage loan competition in the bank's markets. The ARMs currently
offered by the bank are generally subject to a limitation on the annual increase
in the interest rate of 2.0% and a limitation on the increase in the interest
rate over the term of the loan ranging from 6.0% to 9.0%. At September 30, 1998,
36.0% of the bank's residential mortgage loans were comprised of ARMs.
During the current fiscal year, the bank continued to fulfill its $1.0 billion
five-year loan commitment made in 1994 to meet the credit needs of low- and
moderate-income borrowers in the various communities which it serves. As part of
this commitment, the bank's Community Development Fund is providing $140.0
million of mortgage financing over a five- year period, with $7.0 million in
subsidies for below-market mortgage loans, to families in minority neighborhoods
in the District of Columbia and Prince George's County, Maryland.
Loan sales provide the bank with liquidity and additional funds for lending,
enabling the bank to increase the volume of loans originated and thereby
increase loan interest and fee income, and in recent periods have produced
additional non-interest income in the form of gains on sales of loans. In fiscal
1998, sales of mortgage loans originated or purchased for sale by the bank
totaled $124.3 million. The marketability of loans, loan participations and
mortgage- backed securities depends on purchasers' investment limitations,
general market and competitive conditions, mortgage loan demand and other
factors.
The bank's conforming fixed-rate, single- family loans are originated on terms
which conform to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal National
Mortgage Association and Government National Mortgage Association guidelines in
order to facilitate the sale and/or securitization of the mortgage loan. In
order to manage its interest-rate exposure, the bank hedges its held for sale
fixed-rate mortgage loan pipeline by entering into whole loan and
mortgage-backed security forward sale commitments. Sales of residential mortgage
loans are generally made without recourse to the bank. At September 30, 1998,
the bank had $56.3 million of single-family residential loans held for sale to
investors.
From time to time, as part of its capital and liquidity management plans, the
bank may consider exchanging loans held in its portfolio for lower risk-weighted
mortgage-backed securities and retaining those securities in its portfolio
rather than selling them in the secondary mortgage market. During fiscal 1998,
the bank exchanged $1.2 billion of single-family residential loans held in its
portfolio for mortgage-backed securities which the bank retained for its own
portfolio.
When the bank sells a residential whole loan or loan participation and retains
servicing, or purchases mortgage servicing assets from third parties, it
collects and remits loan payments, inspects the properties, makes certain
insurance and tax payments on behalf of borrowers and otherwise services the
loans. The servicing fee, generally ranging from 0.25% to 0.50% of the
outstanding loan principal amount per annum, is recognized as income over the
life of the loans. The bank also typically derives income from temporary
investment for its own account of loan collections pending remittance to the
participation or whole loan purchaser. At September 30, 1998, the bank was
servicing residential permanent loans totaling $4.0 billion for other
investors. See "Loan Servicing."
Sales of Mortgage-Backed Securities. The bank originates and sells
mortgage-backed securities pursuant to its normal mortgage banking operations,
which are generally issued in the same month as they are sold. The securities
are formed from conforming fixed-rate loans originated for sale or from
conforming fixed-rate loans resulting from the borrower's election to convert
from an adjustable-rate loan to a fixed-rate loan. Mortgage-backed securities
held for sale in conjunction with mortgage banking activities are classified as
trading securities. As a result of the sale of trading securities in the month
such securities are formed, the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in this
report reflect significant proceeds from the sales of trading securities, even
though there are no balances of such securities at September 30, 1998.
Home Equity Lending. The bank's home equity credit line loan provides revolving
credit secured principally by a second mortgage on the borrower's home. Such
loans are originated directly by the bank. Home equity credit line loans bear
interest at a variable rate that adjusts monthly based on changes in the
applicable interest rate index and generally are subject to a maximum annual
interest rate of between 18.0% and 24.0%. Generally, except for any amortization
of principal that may occur as a result of monthly payments, there are no
required payments of principal until maturity. In order to promote its home
equity credit line loan program, the bank currently offers prospective borrowers
a below-market interest rate for an introductory period and settlement without
closing costs.
During fiscal 1998, the bank purchased $53.2 million of home equity credit line
loans at a premium. The bank may make additional purchases of such loans in the
future as a way to supplement its direct origination of such loans.
Securitization and sale of home equity receivables has been an important element
of the bank's strategies to enhance liquidity and to maintain compliance with
regulatory capital requirements. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Financial Condition." The bank
transferred $298.8 million, $170.6 million and $96.5 million of home equity
receivables in fiscal 1998, fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1996 to trusts for
securitization and sale to investors. Gains of $19.7 million, $11.8 million and
$4.7 million were recognized by the bank as a result of these transactions. The
bank continues to service the underlying accounts.
Commercial Real Estate and Construction Lending. Commercial real estate, real
estate construction and ground loans are originated directly by the bank.
Aggregate balances of residential and commercial construction, ground and
commercial real estate and multifamily loans increased 68.2% in fiscal 1998 to
$182.5 million at September 30, 1998, from $108.5 million at September 30, 1997.
The bank provides financing, generally at market rates, to certain purchasers of
its real estate owned. Additionally, the bank finances the construction of
residential real estate, principally single-family detached homes and
townhouses, but generally only when a home is under contract for sale by the
builder to a consumer.
Commercial Lending. Commercial loans are originated, underwritten, and managed
by the bank's Business Banking Group. The bank makes loans to business entities
for a variety of purposes, including working capital, acquisitions of machinery
and equipment or other assets, and facilitating cash flows. The bank also
provides acquisition, construction and permanent financing of real estate used
in the borrower's business. A wide variety of products are offered, including
revolving lines of credit for working capital or seasonal needs; term loans for
the financing of fixed assets; letters of credit; cash management services; and
other deposit and investment products.
Business development efforts have been concentrated in the major industry groups
in the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area, as well as a broad base of businesses
and community service organizations. Commercial loans increased $75.8 million
during fiscal 1998 from $98.3 million at September 30, 1997 to $174.1 million at
September 30, 1998. Of the $174.1 million, 26.9% represents participations by
the bank in commercial loans originated by other financial institutions. The
bank believes its balances of commercial loans will increase as it continues to
expand this aspect of its business. In addition, management believes that the
acquisition of ASB can enhance the operations of the Business Banking Group by
allowing the bank to offer a broader variety of investment products and
fiduciary services to institutional customers.
Federal laws and regulations limit the bank's commercial loan portfolio to 20%
of assets, with at least 10% consisting of small business loans.
Consumer Lending. Chevy Chase currently offers a variety of consumer loans,
including automobile loans, overdraft lines of credit, home improvement loans
and other unsecured loans for traditional consumer purchases and needs. In
addition, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the bank offers non-prime
automobile loans. Non-prime refers to a category of loans made to applicants who
have experienced certain adverse credit events, but who meet certain other
creditworthiness tests. See "Consumer Loan Underwriting." During fiscal 1998,
the bank provided consumer credit through its credit card program, which offered
Visa(R) and MasterCard(R) credit cards. At June 30, 1998, credit card loans
outstanding totaled $938.7 million.
Following the sale of the credit card portfolio to FUSA on September 30, 1998,
the bank no longer offers its own credit card loans, but has entered into an
agreement with FUSA pursuant to which the bank will provide credit cards issued
by FUSA to the bank's local customers. The bank's portfolios of automobile
loans, home improvement and related loans and other consumer loans totaled
$357.8 million, $67.4 million and $33.5 million at September 30, 1998, which
accounted for a combined 16.5% of total loans at that date.
The largest areas of recent growth have been in automobile loans and home
improvement loans. During fiscal 1998, the bank purchased or originated $715.2
million and $108.5 million of automobile loans and home improvement loans which
was partially offset by the transfers of $534.7 million and $45.9 million of
receivables to trusts for securitization and sale to investors.
Federal laws and regulations limit the bank's secured and unsecured consumer
loans to 35% of its total assets. Certain consumer loans, which include home
improvement, secured deposit account and educational loans, are not included in
the 35% limit.
Real Estate Loan Underwriting. In the loan approval process, Chevy Chase
assesses both the borrower's ability to repay the loan and, in appropriate
cases, the adequacy of the proposed security. Credit approval is vested with the
Board of Directors and delegated to the Executive Loan Committee and certain
senior officers in accordance with the credit authorizations approved by the
Board of Directors. Generally, all construction and commercial real estate loans
are reviewed and approved by the Executive Loan Committee. Any significant loan
not conforming to the bank's approved policies must be approved by the Executive
Loan Committee or the Chief Executive Officer. Prior to October 1998, all loans
of $15 million or more were presented to the Board of Directors for final
approval. Effective October 1998, the bank increased this threshold to $30
million.
The approval process for all types of real estate loans includes appraisals or
evaluations of the properties securing such loans and a review of the
applicant's financial statements and credit, payment and banking history,
financial statements of any guarantors, and tax returns of guarantors of
construction and commercial real estate loans.
In an effort to minimize the increased risk of loss associated with construction
and development loans, Chevy Chase considers the reputation of the borrower and
the contractor, reviews pre-construction sale and leasing information, and
requires an independent inspecting engineer or architect to review the progress
of multifamily and commercial real estate projects. In addition, the bank
generally requires personal guarantees of developers for all development loans
and, if a general contractor is used by the developer, may require the posting
of a performance bond.
The bank generally lends up to 95% of the appraised value of single-family
residential dwellings to be owner-occupied. The bank also lends up to 85% of the
appraised value of the completed project to finance the construction of such
dwellings, and, on a case-by-case basis, the bank occasionally may lend up to
90% of such appraised value when such financing is limited to pre-sold units.
The loan-to-value ratio generally applied by the bank to commercial real estate
loans and multifamily residential loans has been 80% of the appraised value of
the completed project.
Currently, the bank generally does not originate a traditional second mortgage
loan, excluding home equity credit line loans, if the aggregate loan-to-value
ratio of the second loan and the related first mortgage loan exceeds 80% of the
appraised value of the property. In some circumstances, the bank originates a
first and second mortgage loan simultaneously where the total loan value does
not exceed 90% of the appraised value of the property.
The bank also offers home equity credit line loans up to a 125% maximum
loan-to-value ratio. Private mortgage insurance is generally obtained for the
amount over 80% of the value of the underlying property. Loan-to-value ratios
are determined at the time a loan is originated. Consequently, subsequent
declines in the value of a loan's collateral could expose the bank to losses.
The bank's ability to make loans with a loan-to-value ratio above 90 percent
without mortgage insurance is limited to 100 percent of the bank's total
risk-based capital.
OTS regulations require institutions to adopt internal real estate lending
policies, including loan-to-value limitations conforming to specific guidelines
established by the OTS. The bank's current lending policies conform to these
regulations.
On all loans secured by real estate, other than home improvement and related
loans and certain home equity credit line loans, Chevy Chase requires title
insurance policies protecting the priority of the bank's liens. The bank
requires fire and casualty insurance for permanent loans, including home equity
credit line loans, and fire, casualty and builders' risk insurance for
construction loans. The borrower selects the insurance carrier, subject to Chevy
Chase's approval. Generally, for any residential loan, including home equity
credit line loans, in an amount exceeding 80% of the appraised value of the
security property, Chevy Chase currently requires mortgage insurance from an
independent mortgage insurance company. The majority of the bank's mortgage
insurance is placed with four carriers.
Substantially all fixed-rate mortgage loans originated by the bank contain a due
on sale clause providing that the bank may declare a loan immediately due and
payable in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells the property
securing the loan without the consent of the bank. The bank's ARMs generally are
assumable.
Commercial Loan Underwriting. All commercial loan requests are underwritten and
approved under authorities granted to specified committees and individuals as
outlined in the bank's credit policies. The scope and depth of the underwriting
for a particular request are generally dictated by the size of the proposed
transaction. All commercial loans greater than $100,000 are assigned a risk
rating at inception, utilizing a risk-rating system as defined in the bank's
credit policies.
Consumer Loan Underwriting. Consumer loans, which include automobile loans and
home improvement and related loans and overdraft lines of credit, are originated
or purchased by the bank after a review by the bank in accordance with its
established underwriting procedures.
The underwriting procedures are designed to provide a basis for assessing the
borrower's ability and willingness to repay the loan. In conducting this
assessment, the bank considers the borrower's ratio of debt to income and
evaluates the borrower's credit history through a review of a written credit
report compiled by a recognized consumer credit reporting bureau. The borrower's
equity in the collateral and the terms of the loan are also considered. The
bank's guidelines are intended only to provide a basis for lending decisions,
and exceptions to such guidelines may, within certain limits, be made based upon
the credit judgment of the bank's lending officer. The bank periodically
conducts quality audits to ensure compliance with its established policies and
procedures.
The bank also makes automobile loans through one of its operating subsidiaries.
The underwriting guidelines for this subsidiary apply to a category of lending
in which loans may be made to applicants who have experienced certain adverse
credit events and therefore would not necessarily meet all of the bank's
guidelines for its traditional loan program, but who meet certain other
creditworthiness tests. Such loans may experience higher rates of delinquencies,
repossessions and losses, especially under adverse economic conditions, compared
with loans originated pursuant to the bank's traditional lending program. See
"Subsidiaries Operating Subsidiaries."
Loan Servicing. In addition to interest earned on loans, the bank receives
income through servicing of loans and fees in connection with loan origination,
loan modification, late payments, changes of property ownership and
miscellaneous services related to its loans. Servicing income earned on
single-family residential mortgage loans owned by third parties and the bank's
securitization and servicing of credit card, home equity, automobile and home
loan receivables portfolios, has been a source of substantial earnings for the
bank in recent periods. Income from these activities varies with the volume and
type of loans originated and sold.
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the bank's
servicing income as of or for the years indicated.
As of or For the Year Ended September 30,
---------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ---------------------- ------------ -------------- --------------
Residential......... $4,003,946 $3,930,371 $3,045,650
Credit card......... -- 4,015,172 3,889,704
Home equity......... 421,432 459,130 416,365
Automobile.......... 1,055,746 1,083,026 505,638
Home loans.......... 200,033 244,140 141,106
------------ -------------- --------------
Total amount of
loans serviced
for others (1)... $5,681,157 $9,731,839 $7,998,463
------------ -------------- --------------
Servicing and
securitization
income (2)....... $233,271 $305,192 $284,964
------------ -------------- --------------
- ----------------------
(1) The bank's basis in its servicing assets and interest-only strips at
September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $40.7 million, $128.8 million and $75.4
million.
(2) In each of the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
servicing and securitization income as a percentage of net interest income
before provision for loan losses was 118.2%, 143.6% and 142.9%.
The bank earns fees in connection with the servicing of home equity loans, home
loans, automobile loans, single-family residential mortgage loans and those
credit card loans prior to the sale of the credit card portfolio on September
30, 1998. The bank's level of servicing and securitization income varies based
in large part on the amount of the bank's securitization activities with respect
to these loan types. As the bank securitizes and sells assets, acquires
servicing assets either through purchase or origination, or sells mortgage loans
and retains the servicing rights on those loans, the level of servicing and
securitization income generally increases.
During fiscal 1998, the bank securitized and sold $1.0 billion of credit card
receivables, $298.8 million of home equity receivables, $534.7 million of
automobile loan receivables and $45.9 million of home loan receivables. The
bank's servicing and securitization income decreased from the level achieved in
fiscal 1997 principally because of increases in unrealized losses on
interest-only strips in addition to increases in the amortization of
interest-only strips related to prior gains on sales of loans. The bank's level
of servicing and securitization income also declines upon repayment of assets
previously securitized and sold and repayment of mortgage loans serviced for
others.
The bank's investment in servicing assets, including servicing assets and
interest-only strips, and the amortization of such assets, are periodically
evaluated for impairment. Interest-only strips are evaluated quarterly based on
the discounted value of estimated future net cash flows to be generated by the
underlying loans. The difference between the book value of these assets and the
discounted value is recognized as an unrealized gain or loss in the period in
which the change occurs. Several estimates are used when determining the
discounted value, the most significant of which are the estimated rate of
repayment of the underlying loans and estimated credit losses. The bank
evaluates its servicing assets for impairment based on fair value. To measure
fair value of its servicing assets, the bank uses either quoted market prices or
discounted cash flow analyses using appropriate assumptions for servicing fee
income, servicing costs, prepayment rates and discount rates.
If actual prepayment or default rates significantly exceed the estimates used to
calculate the carrying values of the servicing assets, the actual amount of
future cash flow could be less than the expected amount and the value of the
servicing assets, as well as the bank's earnings, could be negatively impacted.
No assurance can be given that the bank's receivables will not experience
significant increases in prepayment or default rates or that the bank may not
have to continue to write down the value of its servicing assets. Additionally,
the bank stratifies its capitalized servicing assets for purposes of evaluating
impairment by taking into consideration relevant risk characteristics, including
loan type, note rate and date of acquisition. See "Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies The bank" in this report.
The bank prices its single-family mortgage loans to achieve a competitive yield.
Loan origination and commitment fees, and the related costs associated with
making the loans, are deferred. For fully amortizing loans originated for the
bank's portfolio, the net deferred fees are accreted to interest income over the
estimated life of the loans using the level-yield method. Fees deferred on
revolving credit lines or loans which have no scheduled amortization originated
for the bank's portfolio are accreted to income over the estimated lives of the
underlying loans using the straight-line method. Fees deferred on loans
originated and held for sale are not accreted to income but instead are used in
determining the gain or loss on the sale of the loans.
Delinquencies, Foreclosures and Allowances for Losses
Delinquencies and Foreclosures. When a borrower fails to make a required payment
on a mortgage loan, the loan is considered delinquent and, after expiration of
the applicable cure period, the borrower is charged a late fee. The bank follows
practices customary in the banking industry in attempting to cure delinquencies
and in pursuing remedies upon default. Generally, if the borrower does not cure
the delinquency within 90 days, the bank initiates foreclosure action. If the
loan is not reinstated, paid in full or refinanced, the security property is
sold. In some instances, the bank may be the purchaser. Thereafter, such
acquired property is listed in the bank's account for real estate acquired in
settlement of loans until the property is sold. Deficiency judgments generally
may be enforced against borrowers in Maryland, Virginia and the District of
Columbia, but may not be available or may be subject to limitations in other
jurisdictions in which loans are originated by the bank.
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Financial Condition - Asset Quality - Delinquent Loans" for a
discussion of the bank's delinquent loan portfolio at September 30, 1998.
Allowances for Losses. It is the bank's policy to maintain adequate allowances
for estimated losses on loans and real estate. Generally, the allowances are
based on, among other things, historical loan loss experience, evaluation of
economic conditions in general and in various sectors of the bank's customer
base, and periodic reviews of loan portfolio quality by bank personnel. The
bank's specific methods for establishing the appropriate levels of allowances
vary depending upon the assets involved. Allowances for losses on loans and real
estate are based on current events or facts that may ultimately lead to future
losses. In addition to reviews of individual portfolio segments, the bank
regularly reviews its overall loan portfolio consisting of performing
non-classified assets and, based on such review, may establish additional
allowances for losses. The bank's actual losses may vary from management's
current estimates. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition - Asset Quality -
Allowances for Losses."
The bank's allowance on its consumer loans is based on a number of factors,
including historical charge-off and repayment experience. The bank's reserve
methodology is based on an analysis of the characteristics of the portfolio and
trends at any particular time. In this regard, the bank considers various
historical information relative to the origination date, borrower profiles,
delinquencies and other factors. In the case of automobile loans, management
also considers the value of the underlying collateral, which can be adversely
impacted by the time required to liquidate the collateral as well as the age and
type of the collateral, and geographic trends.
The bank's methods for determining the allowance on loans secured by real estate
vary depending on whether the loans are secured by residential homes or by other
real estate. For residential mortgage loans, management analyzes the allowance
by stratifying residential permanent loans on a state by state basis and based
on whether the property is occupied by the owner. After the residential
permanent portfolio has been stratified by state, historical loss ratios, as
adjusted for predictable or quantifiable trends, if known, for the specific
states are applied to delinquent loans. Based on this analysis, a reserve
component is assigned to residential permanent loans. In the bank's experience,
this approach has resulted in timely recognition of necessary allowances, which
has been generally supported by the bank's favorable results on the ultimate
disposition of the underlying collateral.
The bank assesses the adequacy of its general valuation allowances on
non-residential, other than single-family residential, mortgage loans, REO and
real estate held for investment based primarily on an ongoing evaluation of
individual assets. This evaluation takes into consideration a variety of
factors, including cash flow analyses, independent appraisals, market studies,
economic trends and management's knowledge of the market and experience with
particular borrowers. The bank obtains current appraisals when properties are
classified as REO. The bank periodically reviews appraisals and orders new
appraisals as appropriate based on a number of factors, including the date of
the previous appraisal, changes in market conditions and regulatory
requirements.
In addition to the general valuation allowances described above, valuation
allowances are provided for individual loans where the ultimate collection is
considered questionable by management after reviewing the current status of
loans which are contractually past due and considering the net realizable value
of the collateral or guarantees, if applicable.
From fiscal 1994 through fiscal 1998, the bank provided additional general
valuation allowances, which were equal to, or exceeded, the net earnings
generated by the development and sale of land in the Communities. See
"Management's' Discussion and Analyses of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Financial Condition - Asset Quality - Allowances for Losses."
REO is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less selling costs. To date,
sales of REO, non-residential mortgage loans and loans classified as investments
in real estate have resulted in no material additional aggregate loss to the
bank above the amounts already reserved. However, these results do not
necessarily assure that the bank will not suffer losses in the future beyond its
level of allowances.
The bank's individualized asset review takes place within its Asset Review
Committee and the Asset Classification Committee. The Asset Review Committee
accumulates and analyzes data relating to classified and potential problem
assets of $5.0 million or more and makes appropriate recommendations regarding
asset classifications to the Asset Review Committee and the Asset Classification
Committee. These committees meet on a regular basis to discuss classifications
of such assets and to review the allowances for losses. In addition, these
committee generally review the status of various projects, including, for
example, data on recent lot sales for residential development projects. Actual
progress is compared to projections made when the related loan was underwritten.
Local economic conditions and known trends are also reviewed. The committees
also consider steps being taken by borrowers to address problems, and reviews
financial information relating to borrowers and guarantors as well as reports by
loan officers who are responsible for continually evaluating the projects. The
actions of the committees are reported to the Board of Directors.
The Federal Financial Institution Examination Council, which is composed of the
OTS and the other federal banking agencies, has issued guidelines regarding the
appropriate levels of general valuation allowances that should be maintained by
insured institutions. The bank believes that its levels of general valuation
allowances at September 30, 1998 comply with the guidelines.
The bank's assets are subject to review and classification by the OTS upon
examination. Based on such examinations, the bank could be required to establish
additional valuation allowances or incur additional charge-offs.
Deposits and Other Sources of Funds
General. Deposits are the primary source of the bank's funds for use in lending
and for other general business purposes. In addition to deposits, Chevy Chase
receives funds from loan repayments and loan sales. Loan repayments are a
relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows are
influenced by general interest rates and money-market conditions. Borrowings may
be used to compensate for reductions in normal sources of funds, such as deposit
inflows at less than projected levels or deposit outflows, or to support the
bank's operating or investing activities.
Deposits. Chevy Chase currently offers a variety of deposit accounts with a
range of interest rates and maturities designed to attract both long-term and
short-term deposits. Deposit programs include Super Statement Savings, Super
NOW, Insured Money Fund, Checking, Simple Statement Savings, Young Savers,
Certificate, and special programs for Individual Retirement and Keogh
self-employed retirement accounts. At September 30, 1998, all outstanding jumbo
certificates of deposit had been sold directly by the bank to depositors, either
through its branches or through its treasury management services division.
Chevy Chase attracts deposits through its branch network and advertisements, and
offers depositors access to their accounts through 696 ATMs, including 219 ATMs
located in grocery stores. The bank also has the right to install ATMs in
certain additional grocery stores in the greater Washington,
D.C./Baltimore/Richmond area which do not currently have ATM service. These ATMs
and installation rights significantly enhance the bank's position as a leading
provider of convenient ATM service in its primary market area. The bank is a
member of the regional HONOR (R) ATM network which offers over 50,000 locations
nationwide. The bank is also a member of the PLUS (R) ATM network, which offers
over 457,000 locations worldwide. In addition, the bank has a partnership
agreement with a regional grocery store to provide in-store banking centers at
up to 160 Baltimore and Washington area stores.
The bank obtains deposits primarily from customers residing in Montgomery and
Prince George's Counties in Maryland and Northern Virginia. Approximately 31.2%
of the bank's deposits at September 30, 1998 were obtained from depositors
residing outside of Maryland, with approximately 17.9% of the bank's deposits
being obtained from depositors residing in Northern Virginia.
The following table shows the amounts of Chevy Chase's deposits by type of
account at the dates indicated.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Deposit Analysis
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
--------------------- --------------------- --------------------- -------------------- ---------------------
% of % of % of % of % of
Balance Total Balance Total Balance Total Balance Total Balance Total
- ----------------------- ------------ -------- ------------ -------- ------------ -------- ----------- -------- ------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Demand and NOW accounts $ 1,329,839 27.2 % $ 1,120,375 22.9 % $ 1,007,902 24.2 % $ 950,118 22.8 % $ 918,227 22.9 %
Money market deposit
accounts 1,019,569 20.9 983,016 20.1 1,002,688 24.1 984,257 23.7 1,104,730 27.6
Statement savings
accounts 913,467 18.7 907,141 18.5 881,285 21.2 872,366 21.0 1,201,141 30.0
Jumbo certificate
accounts 358,913 7.3 358,737 7.3 125,847 3.0 219,304 5.3 85,110 2.1
Brokered certificate
accounts -- -- 315,142 6.4 -- -- -- -- -- --
Other certificate
accounts 1,168,746 23.9 1,130,274 23.2 1,077,828 25.9 1,072,196 25.8 641,857 16.0
Other deposit
accounts 97,696 2.0 79,071 1.6 68,487 1.6 61,011 1.4 57,696 1.4
------------ -------- ------------ -------- ------------- ------- ------------ ------- ------------ --------
Total deposits $ 4,888,230 100.0 % $ 4,893,756 100.0 % $ 4,164,037 100.0 % $ 4,159,252 100.0 % $ 4,008,761 100.0 %
============ ======== ============ ======== ============= ======= ============ ======= ============ ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The range of deposit account products offered by the bank through its extensive
branch and ATM network allows the bank to be competitive in obtaining funds from
its local retail deposit market. At the same time, however, as customers have
become increasingly responsive to changes in interest rates, the bank has
experienced some fluctuations in deposit flows. Chevy Chase's ability to attract
and maintain deposits and its cost of funds will continue to be significantly
affected by market conditions and its pricing strategy. The bank had $0 and
$315.1 million of brokered deposits at September 30, 1998 and 1997. Chevy Chase
began accepting brokered deposits in fiscal 1997 as a way to diversify the
bank's funding sources. The bank does not currently place significant reliance
on brokered deposits as a key source of funding. Under FDIC regulations, the
bank is permitted to accept brokered deposits as long as it meets the capital
standards established for well capitalized institutions, or with FDIC approval,
adequately-capitalized institutions under the prompt corrective action
regulations.
The following table sets forth Chevy Chase's deposit flows during the periods
indicated.
Deposit Flows
Year Ended September 30,
------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Deposits................ $24,799,407 $18,915,801 $15,312,125
Withdrawals from (24,984,251) (18,354,989) (15,469,909)
accounts................ ----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash to (from) (184,844) 560,812 (157,784)
accounts................
Interest credited to 179,318 168,907 162,569
accounts................ ----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) $(5,526) $729,719 $4,785
in deposit balances..... ============ =========== ===========
Deposit growth may be moderated by the bank from time to time either to take
advantage of lower cost funding alternatives or in response to more modest
expectations for loan and other asset growth.
The following table sets forth, by weighted average interest rates, the types
and amounts of deposits as of September 30, 1998 which will mature during the
fiscal years indicated.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Weighted Average Interest Rates of Deposits
As of September 30, 1998
(Dollars in thousands)
Demand, NOW
and Money Market Statement Passbook and Other Certificate
Deposit Accounts Savings Accounts Core Accounts Accounts Total
----------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ ---------------------
Maturing During Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
Year Ending Average Average Average Average Average
September 30, Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate
- ---------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ------------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999 $ 2,349,408 2.15 % $ 913,467 2.41 % $ 97,696 2.10 % $ 1,236,272 5.20 % $ 4,596,843 3.02 %
2000 - - - - - - 190,466 5.94 190,466 5.94
2001 - - - - - - 40,076 5.46 40,076 5.46
2002 - - - - - - 29,257 5.79 29,257 5.79
2003 - - - - - - 31,588 5.77 31,588 5.77
------------ ----------- ---------- ------------- ------------
Total $ 2,349,408 2.15 % $ 913,467 2.41 % $ 97,696 2.10 % $ 1,527,659 5.32 % $ 4,888,230 3.19 %
============ =========== ========== ============= ============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes maturities of certificate accounts in amounts of
$100,000 or greater as of September 30, 1998.
Year Ending September Amount Weighted Average
30, Rate
------------------------- ------------- ------------------
(Dollars in thousands)
1999.................. $ 343,610 5.29%
2000.................. 17,737 6.47%
2001.................. 2,597 5.56%
2002.................. 2,994 5.67%
2003.................. 3,118 5.80%
------------- ------------------
Total................. $ 370,056 5.69%
------------- ------------------
The following table represents the amounts of deposits by various interest rate
categories as of September 30, 1998 maturing during the fiscal years indicated.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Maturities of Deposits by Interest Rates
As of September 30, 1998
(In thousands)
Accounts Maturing During Year Ending September 30,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Rate 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total
- ------------------------------------ --------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Demand deposits (0%) $ 302,529 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 302,529
0.01% to 1.99% 1,024,485 - - - - 1,024,485
2.00% to 2.99% 1,068,548 - - - - 1,068,548
3.00% to 3.99% 640,744 - - - - 640,744
4.00% to 4.99% 503,894 13,475 1,691 333 - 519,393
5.00% to 5.99% 993,703 90,431 38,308 15,250 26,232 1,163,924
6.00% to 7.99% 62,940 86,560 77 13,674 5,356 168,607
-------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Total $ 4,596,843 $ 190,466 $ 40,076 $ 29,257 $ 31,588 $ 4,888,230
============== =============== ============== ============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Borrowings. The FHLB system functions as a central reserve bank providing credit
for member institutions. As a member of the FHLB of Atlanta, Chevy Chase is
required to own capital stock in the FHLB of Atlanta and is authorized to apply
for advances on the security of such stock and certain of its mortgages and
other assets, including principally securities which are obligations of, or
guaranteed by, the United States or its agencies, provided certain standards
related to creditworthiness have been met.
Under the credit policies of the FHLB of Atlanta, credit may be extended to
creditworthy institutions based upon their financial condition, and the adequacy
of collateral pledged to secure the extension of credit. Such extensions of
credit or borrowings may be obtained pursuant to several different credit
programs, each of which has its own rate and range of maturities. Advances from
the FHLB of Atlanta must be secured by certain types of collateral with a value,
as determined by the FHLB of Atlanta, at least equal to 100% of the borrower's
outstanding advances. The bank had outstanding FHLB advances of $352.0 million
at September 30, 1998.
From time to time, the bank enters into repurchase agreements, which are treated
as financings. The bank sells securities, which are usually mortgage-backed
securities to a dealer and agrees to buy back the same securities at a specified
time, which is generally within seven to 90 days. The bank pays a stated
interest rate for the use of the funds for the specified time period to the
dealer. The obligation to repurchase the securities sold is reflected as a
liability and the securities underlying the agreements are included in assets in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets in this report. These arrangements are, in
effect, borrowings by the bank secured by the securities sold. The bank had
outstanding repurchase agreements of $387.3 million at September 30, 1998.
The following table sets forth a summary of the repurchase agreements of the
bank as of the dates and for the years indicated.
September 30,
---------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) 1998 1997
---------------------------------- ------------ -------------
Securities sold under repurchase
agreements:
Balance at year-end $ 387,305 $ 2,606
Average amount outstanding
during the year 302,564 483,076
Maximum amount outstanding at
any month-end 806,393 946,090
Weighted average interest rate
during the year 5.68% 5.48%
Weighted average interest rate
on year-end balances 5.63% 5.35%
On November 23, 1993, the bank sold $150 million principal amount of its 9-1/4%
Subordinated Debentures due 2005, referred to in this report as the "1993
Debentures". Interest on the 1993 Debentures is payable semiannually on December
1 and June 1 of each year. The OTS approved the inclusion of the principal
amount of the 1993 Debentures in the bank's supplementary capital for regulatory
capital purposes. As of December 1, 1998, the 1993 Debentures are redeemable, in
whole or in part, at any time at the option of the bank.
On December 3, 1996, the bank sold $100 million principal amount of its 9 1/4%
Subordinated Debentures due 2008, referred to in this report as the "1996
Debentures". Interest on the 1996 Debentures is payable semiannually on December
1 and June 1 of each year. The OTS approved the inclusion of the principal
amount of the 1996 Debentures in the bank's supplementary capital for regulatory
capital purposes. On or after December 1, 2001, the 1996 Debentures will be
redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at the option of the bank.
Under the OTS capital regulations, redemption of the 1993 Debentures or the 1996
Debentures prior to their stated maturity would be subject to prior approval of
the OTS unless the debentures are redeemed with the proceeds of, or replaced by,
a like amount of a similar or higher quality capital instrument.
Subsidiaries
OTS regulations generally permit the bank to make investments in service
corporation subsidiaries in an amount not to exceed 3.0% of the bank's assets,
provided that any investment in excess of 2.0% of assets serves primarily
community, inner city or community development purposes. Such regulations also
permit the bank to make conforming loans to such subsidiaries and joint ventures
in an amount not to exceed 50% of the bank's regulatory capital. At September
30, 1998, 2.0% and 3.0% of the bank's assets was equal to $135.0 million and
$202.5 million and the bank had $9.3 million invested in its service corporation
subsidiaries, $5.0 million of which was in the form of conforming loans.
The bank is required to provide 30 days advance notice to the OTS and to the
FDIC before establishing a new subsidiary or conducting a new activity in an
existing subsidiary. With prior written approval from the OTS, the bank may also
establish operating subsidiaries to engage in any activities in which the bank
may engage directly. The bank engages in a variety of other activities through
its subsidiaries, including those described below.
Real Estate Development Activities. Manor Investment Company was engaged in
certain real estate development activities commenced prior to the enactment of
FIRREA and continues to manage the two remaining properties it holds. As a
result of the stringent capital requirements that FIRREA applies to investments
in subsidiaries, such as Manor, that engage in activities impermissible for
national banks, Manor has not entered, and does not intend to enter, into any
new real estate development arrangements. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition
- - Asset Quality."
Securities Brokerage Services. Chevy Chase Securities, Inc., is a subsidiary of
Chevy Chase Financial Services Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chevy
Chase. Chevy Chase Securities, Inc. is a licensed broker-dealer, selling
securities on a retail basis to the general public, including customers and
depositors of the bank.
Insurance Services. Chevy Chase Insurance Agency, Inc., a subsidiary of CCFS, is
a licensed insurance broker offering a variety of personal line insurance
programs in the property and casualty field ,primarily homeowner and automobile
insurance, and in the life insurance field, (primarily mortgage and credit card
life and disability programs, to the general public, including customers and
depositors of the bank.
Special Purpose Subsidiaries. At September 30, 1998, Chevy Chase Real Estate
Corporation, a subsidiary of Chevy Chase, held 100% of the common stock of 23
subsidiaries 14 of which are active and a majority of which were formed for the
sole purpose of acquiring title to various real estate projects pursuant to
foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The bank's investment in the
subsidiaries was $111.3 million at September 30, 1998. The bank's investment in
CCRC is not subject to the 3.0% service corporation investment limit discussed
above.
Operating Subsidiaries. Chevy Chase engages in significant mortgage lending
activities through B.F. Saul Mortgage Company. See "Lending Activities."
Consumer Finance Corporation was formed as an operating subsidiary in December
1994 to engage in automobile lending. Chevy Chase Preferred Capital Corporation
was formed as an operating subsidiary to issue the REIT Preferred Stock.
On November 12, 1997, a newly formed operating subsidiary of the bank acquired
ASB Capital Management, Inc. through which the bank offers investment,
management and fiduciary services to primarily institutional customers.
CCB Holding Corporation was a Delaware corporation created by the bank as an
operating subsidiary in September 1994 in connection with its credit card
securitization activities. Subsequent to the sale of the bank's credit card
portfolio and related operations, CCBH was merged into the bank on September 30,
1998.
Employees
The bank and its subsidiaries had 3,923 full-time and 595 part-time employees at
September 30, 1998. In connection with the sale of the credit card portfolio and
related operations to FUSA on September 30, 1998, the bank entered into an
agreement with FUSA to lease the bank's 1,173 credit card employees to FUSA for
the quarter ending December 31, 1998, after which FUSA agreed to offer
employment to all such employees.
The bank provides its employees with a comprehensive range of employee benefit
programs, including group health benefits, life insurance, disability insurance,
paid sick leave and an employee loan program. The bank offers home mortgage
loans to employees at prevailing market rates, but waives up to one point of any
loan origination fees on home mortgage loans, and provides a yearly rebate equal
to 0.5% of the outstanding loan balance of home mortgage loans at calendar
year-end. The bank also offers employees a one percent discount on the interest
rate on overdraft lines of credit. None of the bank's employees is represented
by a collective bargaining agent. The bank believes that its employee relations
are good.
Competition
Chevy Chase encounters strong competition both in attracting deposits and making
real estate and other loans in its markets. The bank's most direct competition
for deposits has come from other thrifts, commercial banks and credit unions, as
well as from money market funds and corporate and government securities. In
addition to offering competitive interest rates, Chevy Chase offers a variety of
services, convenient ATM locations and convenient office locations and hours to
attract deposits. Competition for real estate and other loans comes principally
from other thrifts, banks, mortgage banking companies, insurance companies and
other institutional lenders. Chevy Chase competes for loans through interest
rates, loan fees and the variety and quality of services provided to borrowers
and brokers.
The bank's major competition historically has come from local depository
institutions, but deregulation of the financial services industry and changing
market demands in recent years have eroded distinctions between providers of
financial services. In addition, both depository and non-depository institutions
have greater nationwide access to attractive markets, such as the Washington,
D.C. area, than they have had in past years. Chevy Chase now competes with
regional financial institutions and national providers of investment
alternatives, as well as with a number of large money center and regional banks
that have acquired institutions in the area.
The bank estimates that it competes principally with approximately thirteen
depository institutions in its deposit-taking activities in the Washington, DC
metropolitan area. The bank also competes with such institutions in the
origination of single-family residential mortgage loans and home equity credit
line loans. According to the most recently published industry statistics, Chevy
Chase had the largest market share, approximately 23%, of deposits in Montgomery
County, Maryland, and ranked third in market share, approximately 10%, of
deposits in Prince George's County, Maryland at June 30, 1997. Based on publicly
available information, Chevy Chase estimates that, in the Washington, DC
metropolitan area, it maintains the leading market share of single-family
residential mortgage and home equity credit line loans.
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Real Estate
A list of the investment properties of the Real Estate Trust is set forth under
"Business - Real- Estate - Real Estate
Investments."
The Trust conducts its principal business from its executive offices at 8401
Connecticut Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland. The Trust sells its unsecured notes
due one year to ten years from date of issue from a sales office located at 7200
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 903, Bethesda, Maryland. The Saul Company leases both
office facilities on behalf of the Trust.
Banking
At September 30, 1998, the bank conducted its business from its home office at
7926 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia and its executive offices at 8401
Connecticut Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland; its operations centers at 6151 and
6200 Chevy Chase Drive, Laurel, Maryland; its office facilities at 7700 Old
Georgetown Road, Bethesda, Maryland, 7735 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda,
Maryland and 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC; and 143 full-service
offices located in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia. On that
date, the bank owned the building and land for 26 of its branch offices and
leased its remaining 117 branch offices. Chevy Chase leases the office
facilities at 8401 Connecticut Avenue, 6200 Chevy Chase Drive, 7735 Old
Georgetown Road, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW and the land at 7700 Old
Georgetown Road. Chevy Chase owns the building at 7700 Old Georgetown Road. In
addition, the bank leases office space in which its subsidiaries are housed. The
office facility leases have various terms expiring from 1999 to 2019 and the
ground leases have terms expiring from 2029 to 2080. The bank also owns the
building and land at 5202 President's Court, Frederick, Maryland. In connection
with the sale of the credit card portfolio and related operations on September
30, 1998, the bank entered into a lease agreement with FUSA for this facility.
See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for
lease expense and commitments.
As of November, 1998, the bank has received OTS approval to open fifteen
full-service branch offices. The branches, seven in Virginia, seven in Maryland
and the bank's first branch in Delaware, are scheduled to open during fiscal
1999.
The following table sets forth the location of the bank's 143 full-service
branch offices at September 30, 1998.
1 Catoctin Circle 14245R Centreville Square
Leesburg, VA 22075 Centreville, VA 20121
8201 Greensboro Drive 1100 W. Broad Street
McLean, VA 22102 Falls Church, VA 22046
234 Maple Avenue East 3941 Pickett Road
McLean, VA 22180 Fairfax, VA 22031
8436 Old Keene Mill Road 1439 Chain Bridge Road
Springfield, VA 22152 McLean, VA 22031
75 West Lee Highway 8120 Sudley Road
Warrenton, VA 22186 Manassas, VA 22110
6367 Seven Corners Center 1100 S. Hayes Street
Falls Church, VA 22044 Arlington, VA 22202
11800 Sunrise Valley Drive 13344-A Franklin Farms Road
Reston, VA 22091 Herndon, VA 20165
2952-H Chain Bridge Road 20970 Southbanks Street
Oakton, VA 22124 Sterling, VA 20165
1201 Elden Street 21800 Towncenter Plaza
Herndon, VA 20170 Sterling, VA 20164
5613 Stone Road 7030 Little River Turnpike
Centreville, VA 22020 Annandale, VA 22003
44151 Ashburn Village Way 3095 Nutley Street
Ashburn, VA 22011 Fairfax, VA 22031
3690-A King Street 4700 Lee Highway
Alexandria, VA 22302 Arlington, VA 22207
6609 Springfield Mall 5851 Crossroads Center Way
Springfield, VA 22150 Falls Church, VA 22041
500 South Washington Street 13813 Foulger's Square
Alexandria, VA 22314 Woodbridge, VA 22192
10100 Dumfries Road 6800 Richmond Highway
Manassas, VA 22192 Alexandria, VA 22306
5870 Kingstowne Boulevard 6335 Multiplex Drive
Alexandria, VA 23210 Centreville, VA 22022
43761 Parkhurst Plaza 6025-A Burke Town Center Parkway
Ashburn, VA 22011 Burke, VA 22015
3499 S. Jefferson Street 7935 L Tysons Corner Center
Baileys Crossroads, VA 22041 McLean, VA 22102
3046 Gatehouse Plaza 11874 Spectrum Center
Falls Church, VA 22042 Reston, VA 20190
1621 B Crystal Square Arcade 5230-A Port Royal Road
Arlington, VA 22202 Springfield, VA 22151
1100 Wilson Boulevard 8628 Richmond Highway
Arlington, VA 22209 Alexandria, VA 22309
4299 Merchant Plaza 46160 Potomac Run Plaza
Woodbridge, VA 22192 Sterling, VA 20190
7500 Old Georgetown Road 11301 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20814 Kensington, MD 20895
5370 Westbard Avenue 26001 Ridge Road
Bethesda, MD 20816 Damascus, MD 20872
7340 Westlake Terrace 17831 Georgia Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20817 Olney, MD 20832
1327 Lamberton Drive 11261 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20902 Silver Spring, MD 20904
2215 Bel Pre Road 1609-B Rockville Pike
Wheaton, MD 20906 Rockville, MD 20852
8401 Connecticut Avenue 6107 Greenbelt Road
Chevy Chase, MD 20815 Berwyn Heights, MD 20740
5424 Western Avenue 4 Bureau Drive
Chevy Chase, MD 20815 Gaithersburg, MD 20878
13641 Connecticut Avenue 19610 Club House Road
Wheaton, MD 20906 Gaithersburg, MD 20879
8315 Georgia Avenue 812 Muddy Branch Road
Silver Spring, MD 20910 Gaithersburg, MD 20878
4701 Sangamore Road 10211 River Road
Bethesda, MD 20816 Potomac, MD 20854
Landover Mall 11413 Baltimore Avenue
Landover, MD 20785 Laurel, MD 20707
6200 Annapolis Road 7290-A Cradlerock Way
Landover Hills, MD 20784 Columbia, MD 21045
33 West Franklin Street 1151 Maryland Route 3 North
Hagerstown, MD 21740 Gambrills, MD 21054
6400 Belcrest Road 12228 Viers Mill Road
Hyattsville, MD 20782 Silver Spring, MD 20906
8740 Arliss Street 317 Kentlands Boulevard
Silver Spring, MD 20901 Gaithersburg, MD 20878
2409 Wootton Parkway 215 N. Washington Street
Rockville, MD 20850 Rockville, MD 20850
8889 Woodyard Road 1336 Crain Highway South
Clinton, MD 20735 Mitchellville, MD 20716
1181 University Boulevard 543 Ritchie Highway
Langley Park, MD 20783 Severna Park, MD 21146
12921 Wisteria Drive 4745 Dorsey Hall Drive
Germantown, MD 20874 Ellicott City, MD 21042
1009 West Patrick Street 1130 Smallwood Drive
Frederick, MD 21701 Waldorf, MD 20603
7937 Ritchie Highway 10800 Baltimore Avenue
Glen Burnie, MD 21061 Beltsville, MD 20705
19781-83 Frederick Road 1040 Largo Center Drive
Germantown, MD 20876 Landover, MD 20785
16827 Crabbs Branch Way 6335 Marlboro Pike
Rockville, MD 20855 District Heights, MD 20747
2321-A Forest Drive 7530 Annapolis Road
Annapolis, MD 21401 Lanham, MD 20784
15460 Annapolis Road 11241 Georgia Avenue
Bowie, MD 20715 Wheaton, MD 20902
20000 Goshen Road 13484 New Hampshire Avenue
Gaithersburg, MD 20879 Silver Spring, MD 20904
12097 Rockville Pike 2401 Cleanleigh Drive
Rockville, MD 20852 Baltimore, MD 21234
10159 New Hampshire Avenue 7101 Democracy Boulevard
Hillandale, MD 20903 Bethesda, MD 20814
6264 Central Avenue 4825 Cordell Avenue
Seat Pleasant, MD 20743 Bethesda, MD 20814
7700 Old Georgetown Road 7515 Greenbelt Road
Bethesda, MD 20814 Greenbelt, MD 20770
15777 Columbia Pike 2722 N. Salisbury Boulevard
Burtonsville, MD 20866 Salisbury, MD 21801
18104 Town Center Drive 509 N. Frederick Avenue
Olney, MD 20832 Gaithersburg, MD 20877
6197 Oxon Hill Road 504 Ridgeville Boulevard
Oxon Hill, MD 20745 Mt. Airy, MD 21771
10821 Connecticut Avenue 5823 Eastern Avenue
Kensington, MD 20895 Chillum, MD 20782
18006 Mateny Road 3355 Corridor Market Place
Germantown, MD 20874 Laurel, MD 20724
7406 Baltimore Avenue 10400 Old Georgetown Road
College Park, MD 20740 Bethesda, MD 20814
980 E. Swan Creek Road 115 University Boulevard West
Fort Washington, MD 20744 Silver Spring, MD 20901
3828 International Drive 9707 Old Georgetown Road
Silver Spring, MD 20906 Bethesda, MD 20814
3400 Crain Highway 7941 Tuckerman Lane
Bowie, MD 20716 Potomac, MD 20854
2315 Randolph Road P.O. Box 170, Stamp Student Union
Silver Spring, MD 20906 College, Park, MD 20742
6020 Marshalee Drive 5400 Corporate Drive
Elkridge, MD 21227 Frederick, MD 21703
2950 Donnell Drive 20944 Frederick Road
Forestville, MD 20747 Germantown, MD 20876
135 East Baltimore Street 3601 St. Barnabas Road
Baltimore, MD 21202 Silver Hill, MD 20746
2807 University Boulevard West 1850 K Street, NW
Kensington, MD 20895 Washington, DC 20006
4860 Massachusetts Avenue, NW 4000 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016 Washington, DC 20016
210 Michigan Avenue, NE 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20017 Washington, DC 20006
4455 Connecticut Avenue, NW 925 15th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20008 Washington, DC 20005
2831 Alabama Avenue, SE 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20020 Washington, DC 20006
1800 M Street, NW 5714 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Washington, DC 20015
1545 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20007
At September 30, 1998, the net book value of the bank's office facilities,
including leasehold improvements, was $149.4 million. See Note 17 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
During fiscal 1998, the bank entered into an agreement to lease approximately
3.5 acres of land located at 7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland, on which
the bank intends to develop and occupy an office building to use as its new
corporate headquarters. At September 30, 1998, the bank had invested $5.5
million related to this facility.
The bank owns additional assets, including furniture and data processing
equipment. At September 30, 1998, these other assets had a net book value of
$131.0 million. The bank also has operating leases, primarily for certain data
processing equipment and software. Such leases have month-to-month or
year-to-year terms.
<PAGE>
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of business, the Trust is involved in certain litigation,
including litigation arising out of the collection of loans, the enforcement or
defense of the priority of its security interests, the continued development and
marketing of certain of its real estate properties, and certain employment
claims. In the opinion of management, litigation which is currently pending will
not have a material adverse impact on the financial condition or future
operations of the Trust.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
There currently is no established public trading market for the Trust's Common
Shares of Beneficial Interest (the "Common Shares"). At December 4, 1998, there
were nine corporate or individual holders of record of Common Shares. All
holders of Common Shares at such date were affiliated with the Trust. The Trust
did not pay any cash dividends on the Common Shares during the past two fiscal
years. See "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management."
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data of the Trust herein have been derived from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Trust. The data should be read in
conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere in this report.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
=========================================================================================================
Year Ended September 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts
and other data) 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Real Estate:
Revenues $ 98,592 $ 84,569 $ 76,839 $ 77,285 $ 66,044
Operating expenses 118,636 108,601 104,321 109,971 102,087
Equity in earnings (losses) of partnership
investments 1,918 4,150 3,374 3,681 1,738
Gain (loss) on sales of property (331) 895 (68) 1,664 --
---------------------------------------------------------------
Real estate operating loss (18,457) (18,987) (24,176) (27,341) (34,305)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Banking:
Interest income 435,807 452,376 388,196 365,439 334,544
Interest expense 238,410 239,815 188,836 189,114 165,544
---------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income 197,397 212,561 199,360 176,325 169,000
Provision for loan losses (150,829) (125,115) (115,740) (54,979) (29,222)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income after provision for
loan losses 46,568 87,446 83,620 121,346 139,778
---------------------------------------------------------------
Other income:
Servicing and securitization income 233,271 305,192 284,964 195,744 30,516
Credit card fees 53,881 57,381 30,765 9,855 69,878
Deposit servicing fees 51,997 41,893 29,900 24,442 20,347
Gain (loss) on sales of trading
securities, net 982 1,203 1,158 (600) 1,695
Net unrealized losses on trading
securities (1,258) -- -- -- --
Gain (loss) on real estate held for
investment or sale, net (16,539) (18,688) (24,413) (5,549) 835
Gain on sales of assets 290,434 1,527 1,732 1,289 20,980
Other 29,089 22,573 19,713 7,320 15,718
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total other income 641,857 411,081 343,819 232,501 159,969
---------------------------------------------------------------
Operating expenses 504,018 418,346 381,328 298,164 246,560
---------------------------------------------------------------
Banking operating income 184,407 80,181 46,111 55,683 53,187
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Company:
Operating income 165,950 61,194 21,935 28,342 18,882
Provision for income taxes 42,869 12,810 8,301 2,021 7,025
---------------------------------------------------------------
Income before extraordinary items,
cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle and minority
interest 123,081 48,384 13,634 26,321 11,857
Extraordinary item:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt,
net of taxes (9,601) -- -- -- (11,315)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Income before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle and minority
interest 113,480 48,384 13,634 26,321 542
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle -- -- -- -- 36,260
---------------------------------------------------------------
Income before minority interest 113,480 48,384 13,634 26,321 36,802
Minority interest held by affiliates (22,043) (6,848) (3,962) (5,721) (3,963)
Minority interest -- other (25,313) (22,676) (9,750) (9,750) (9,750)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total company net income (loss) $ 66,124 $ 18,860 $ (78) $ 10,850 $ 23,089
===============================================================
Return on average assets 0.98 % 0.26 % (0.01) % 0.21 % 0.44 %
Net income (loss) available to common
shareholders $ 60,706 $ 13,442 $ (5,498) $ 5,430 $ 17,669
Net income (loss) per common share:
Income before extraordinary items,
cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle and minority
interest $ 24.38 $ 8.90 $ 1.70 $ 4.33 $ 1.33
Extraordinary item:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt,
net of taxes (1.99) -- -- -- (2.34)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle and
minority interest 22.39 8.90 1.70 4.33 (1.01)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle -- -- -- -- 7.51
---------------------------------------------------------------
Income before minority interest 22.39 8.90 1.70 4.33 6.50
Minority interest held by affiliates (4.57) (1.42) (0.82) (1.19) (0.82)
Minority interest -- other (5.24) (4.70) (2.02) (2.02) (2.02)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total company net income (loss) $ 12.58 $ 2.78 $ (1.14) $ 1.12 $ 3.66
===============================================================
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continued on following page.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<PAGE>
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(Continued)
=========================================================================================================
Year Ended September 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts
and other data) 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Assets:
Real estate assets $ 323,432 $ 300,573 $ 294,503 $ 313,412 $ 327,739
Income-producing properties, net 183,879 156,535 156,115 163,787 159,529
Land parcels 40,110 42,160 41,580 38,458 38,455
Banking assets 6,721,149 6,057,413 5,693,074 4,911,536 4,666,298
Total company assets 7,044,581 6,357,986 5,987,577 5,224,948 4,994,037
Liabilities:
Real estate liabilities 636,036 590,910 578,092 555,814 558,109
Mortgage notes payable 198,874 180,204 173,345 184,502 185,730
Notes payable - secured 200,000 175,000 177,500 175,500 175,000
Notes payable - unsecured 50,335 46,633 42,367 41,057 40,288
Banking liabilities 6,141,636 5,582,167 5,388,444 4,619,451 4,413,832
Minority interest held by affiliates 72,242 51,388 46,065 43,556 35,632
Minority interest - other 218,306 218,306 74,307 74,307 74,307
Total company liabilities 7,068,220 6,442,771 6,086,908 5,293,128 5,081,880
Shareholders' deficit (23,639) (84,785) (99,331) (68,180) (87,843)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOW DATA:
Net cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Real estate $ 14,738 $ 6,911 $ 9,782 $ 4,324 $ (10,859)
Banking 2,211,589 2,368,287 1,747,887 2,088,022 2,213,876
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Company 2,226,327 2,375,198 1,757,669 2,092,346 2,203,017
---------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows provided by (used in)
investing activities:
Real estate (45,115) (11,664) (4,907) (17,143) (29,118)
Banking (2,202,225) (2,276,165) (2,567,763) (2,261,803) (1,772,895)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Company (2,247,340) (2,287,829) (2,572,670) (2,278,946) (1,802,013)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows provided by (used in)
financing activities:
Real estate 26,079 7,485 (6,714) (271) 75,723
Banking 555,201 293,344 727,019 160,966 (260,094)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Company 581,280 300,829 720,305 160,695 (184,371)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents 560,267 388,198 (94,696) (25,905) 216,633
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER DATA:
Hotels:
Number of hotels 12 10 9 10 9
Number of guest rooms 2,772 2,370 2,261 2,608 2,415
Average occupancy 68% 70% 68% 67% 62%
Average room rate $81.01 $72.21 $68.79 $60.82 $57.57
Office properties:
Number of properties 7 8 8 9 9
Leasable area (square feet) 1,270,000 1,308,000 1,308,000 1,368,000 1,363,000
Leasing percentages 100% 99% 93% 84% 93%
Land parcels:
Number of parcels 10 10 9 10 10
Total acreage 434 439 446 433 433
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Trust has prepared its financial statements and other disclosures on a fully
consolidated basis. The term "Trust" used in the text and the financial
statements included herein refers to the combined entity, which includes B. F.
Saul Real Estate Investment Trust and its subsidiaries, including Chevy Chase
and Chevy Chase's subsidiaries. "Real Estate Trust" refers to B. F. Saul Real
Investment Trust and its subsidiaries, excluding Chevy Chase and Chevy Chase's
subsidiaries. The operations conducted by the Real Estate Trust are designated
as "Real Estate," while the business conducted by the Bank and its subsidiaries
is identified by the term "Banking."
Financial Condition
Real Estate
The Real Estate Trust's investment portfolio at September 30, 1998 consisted
primarily of hotels, office and industrial projects, and land parcels. See
"Business - Real Estate - Real Estate Investments." In the first quarter of
fiscal 1998, the Real Estate Trust purchased a 308-room Holiday Inn in
Arlington, Virginia.
Office space in the Real Estate Trust's office property portfolio was 100%
leased at September 30, 1998, compared to a leasing rate of 99% at September 30,
1997. At September 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust's office property portfolio
had a total gross leasable area of approximately 1.3 million square feet, of
which 259,000 square feet, or 20.4%, and 209,000 square feet, or 16.5%, are
subject to leases whose terms expire in fiscal 1999 and fiscal 2000.
Overall, the hotel portfolio experienced an average occupancy rate of 68% and
average room rate of $81.01 during the year ended September 30, 1998. For the
nine hotels owned by the Real Estate Trust throughout fiscal 1998 and fiscal
1997, the average occupancy rates were 69% and 70% and the average room rates
were $79.31 and $72.58. Three of these hotels registered improved occupancies
and eight registered higher average room rates in the current fiscal year.
Banking
General. The bank recorded operating income of $184.4 million during fiscal
1998, compared to operating income of $80.2 million during fiscal 1997. The
increase in income for fiscal 1998 was primarily attributable to a $230.8
million increase in other non-interest income, largely attributable to the sale
of the bank's credit card portfolio, which was partially offset by an $85.7
million increase in operating non-interest expenses and a $25.7 million increase
in the provision for loan losses. See "Results of Operations."
Gain on sales of loans of $290.4 million, representing an increase of $288.9
million over fiscal 1997, was a large component of the bank's non-interest
income during the current year and resulted primarily from the sale of the
bank's credit card portfolio and related operations on September 30, 1998. The
credit card portfolio included approximately $4.8 billion of managed credit card
loans and 3.1 million Visa and MasterCard credit card accounts. The bank
recognized a net gain of $288.3 million on this sale. See Note 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Servicing and securitization income decreased $71.9 million, or 23.6%, during
fiscal 1998 and resulted from increases in the amortization of and unrealized
losses on interest-only strips. The bank recognized net unrealized losses on
interest-only strips of $42.9 million during fiscal 1998 compared to net
unrealized gains of $7.0 million during fiscal 1997. In addition, amortization
of $99.0 million on interest-only strips related to prior gains on sales of
loans was recorded in fiscal 1998 compared to $24.8 million in fiscal 1997.
Offsetting these amounts were gains on the securitization and sale of loan
receivables. During fiscal 1998, the bank securitized and sold $1.9 billion of
receivables, of which $1.0 billion, $298.8 million, $534.7 million and $45.9
million, related to securitizations and sales of credit card, home equity,
automobile and home loan receivables and recognized gains of $81.6 million,
$19.7 million, $23.1 million and $3.4 million on these transactions. In
addition, the bank securitized and sold $36.0 million of amounts on deposit in
certain spread accounts established in connection with certain of the bank's
credit card securitizations. See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
in this report. See "Liquidity."
Real estate owned, net of valuation allowances, declined 27.9% during fiscal
1998 to $65.4 million at September 30, 1998, from $90.7 million at September 30,
1997. This reduction was primarily due to sales in the Communities and other
properties and additional valuation allowances. See "REO."
At September 30, 1998, the bank's tangible, core, tier 1 risk-based and total
risk-based regulatory capital ratios were 7.93%, 7.93%, 12.93% and 20.70%. The
bank's capital ratios exceeded the requirements under FIRREA as well as the
standards established for well-capitalized institutions under the prompt
corrective action regulations issued pursuant to FDICIA. See "Capital."
On November 12, 1997 the bank purchased ASB Capital Management, Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Nationsbank Corporation and one of the largest
SEC-registered investment managers headquartered in the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area, through which the bank provides a variety of investment
products and fiduciary services to a primarily institutional customer base.
During fiscal 1998, the bank declared and paid, out of the retained earnings of
the bank, cash dividends on its Common Stock in the aggregate amount of $650 per
share. Subsequent to September 30, 1998, the bank declared, out of the retained
earnings of the bank, cash dividends on its Common Stock in the amount of $2,300
per share. Of this amount, $2,100 per share was paid in December 1998 and $200
per share was paid in January 1999. Of these dividends paid by the bank, $5.2
million and $18.4 million were paid to the Real Estate Trust as owner of 80% of
the bank's Common Stock. For a discussion regarding the use of such payments by
the Real Estate Trust, see "--Liquidity and Capital Resources."
The bank's assets are subject to review and classification by the OTS upon
examination. The bank has been notified that the OTS will begin its annual
safety and soundness examination in December 1998.
The sale of the credit card portfolio has improved the bank's regulatory capital
ratios and the overall credit quality of the bank's loan portfolio. In addition,
the bank anticipates additional long-term savings on overhead expenses as a
result of the sale. However, the credit card program has historically been a
major source of earnings for the bank. Although the bank believes it will be
able to operate profitably by relying on its core deposit franchise as a
significant source of low-cost funds, and investing those funds in assets that,
although offering lower yields than credit cards, involve less credit risk and
overhead costs, achieving acceptable levels of profitability may take some
period of time as the bank restructures its operations.
Asset Quality. Non-Performing Assets. The bank's level of non-performing assets
continued to decline during fiscal 1998. The following table sets forth
information concerning the bank's non-performing assets at the dates indicated.
The figures shown are after charge-offs and, in the case of real estate acquired
in settlement of loans, after all valuation allowances.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Non-Performing Assets
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Non-performing assets:
Non-accrual loans:
Residential $ 8,106 $ 9,617 $ 8,200 $ 8,593 $ 8,306
Commercial real estate and multifamily -- -- -- 194 --
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Total non-accrual real estate loans 8,106 9,617 8,200 8,787 8,306
Credit card (1) (2) -- -- 25,350 18,569 16,229
Consumer 4,501 4,226 1,239 595 498
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Total non-accrual loans (3) 12,607 13,843 34,789 27,951 25,033
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Non-accrual real estate held for investment (3) -- -- -- -- 8,915
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans 218,972 231,407 246,380 354,277 387,024
Allowance for losses on real estate acquired in settlement of
loans (153,564) (140,738) (126,519) (135,043) (109,074)
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans, net 65,408 90,669 119,861 219,234 277,950
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Total non-performing assets 78,015 104,512 154,650 247,185 311,898
Accruing loans past due 90 days -- 25,700 -- -- --
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Total non-performing assets and accruing loans past
due 90 days $ 78,015 $ 130,212 $ 154,650 $ 247,185 $ 311,898
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Troubled debt restructurings $ 11,800 $ 11,861 $ 13,618 $ 17,344 $ 29,141
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Allowance for losses on loans $ 60,157 $ 105,679 $ 95,523 $ 60,496 $ 50,205
Allowance for losses on real estate held for investment 202 198 191 193 9,899
Allowance for losses on real estate acquired in settlement of
loans 153,564 140,738 126,519 135,043 109,074
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Total allowances for losses $ 213,923 $ 246,615 $ 222,233 $ 195,732 $ 169,178
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Interest income recorded
Non-accrual loans $ 38 $ 441 $ 770 $ 846 $ 1,108
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Restructured loans $ 367 $ 265 $ 507 $ 1,189 $ 1,634
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Interest income that would have been recorded had the loans
been current in accordance with their original terms
Non-accrual loans $ 1,081 $ 5,692 $ 7,364 $ 4,853 $ 6,284
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Restructured loans $ 1,244 $ 1,244 $ 1,693 $ 2,381 $ 2,783
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Bank sold its credit card portfolio and related operations on September 30, 1998.
(2) Effective June 30, 1997, the Bank stopped placing credit card loans on non-accrual status.
(3) Before deduction of allowances for losses.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Non-Performing Assets (Continued)
September 30,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
-----------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Ratios:
Non-performing assets and credit card loans past due
90 days, net to total assets (1) 0.26% 0.40% 1.04% 3.80% 5.40%
Allowance for losses on real estate loans to non-accrual
real estate loans (2) 204.68% 99.80% 134.44% 123.82% 169.58%
Allowance for losses on consumer loans to
non-accrual consumer and other loans (2) 758.08% 148.37% 370.86% 542.18% 217.67%
Allowance for losses on loans to non-accrual loans (2) 477.17% 763.41% 274.58% 216.44% 200.56%
Allowance for losses on loans to total loans receivable (3) 2.17% 4.17% 2.81% 2.05% 1.97%
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Non-performing assets is presented after all allowances for losses on loans and real estate held for investment or sale.
(2) Before deduction of allowances for losses.
(3) Includes loans receivable and loans held for sale and/or securitization, before deduction of allowance for losses.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans, defined as loans contractually
past due 90 days or more or with respect to which other factors indicate that
full payment of principal and interest is unlikely, non-accrual real estate held
for investment, and REO, acquired either through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of
foreclosure, or pursuant to in-substance foreclosure.
Prior to the sale of its credit card portfolio and related operations and
effective June 30, 1997, the bank conformed its reporting practices for credit
card loans to those of most credit card issuers and excluded credit card loans
from non-accrual loans and non-performing assets. Credit card loans were not
placed on non-accrual status, but continued to accrue interest until the loan
was either paid-off or charged-off.
Non-performing assets totaled $78.0 million, after valuation allowances on REO
of $153.6 million, at September 30, 1998, compared to $104.5 million, after
valuation allowances on REO of $140.7 million, at September 30, 1997. In
addition to the valuation allowances on REO, the bank maintained $4.6 million
and $1.4 million of valuation allowances on its non-accrual loans at September
30, 1998, and September 30, 1997. The $26.5 million decrease in non-performing
assets was comprised of a net decrease in REO of $25.3 million and a decrease in
non-accrual loans of $1.2 million.
Non-accrual Loans. The bank's non-accrual loans totaled $12.6 million at
September 30, 1998, compared to $13.8 million at September 30, 1997. At
September 30, 1998, non-accrual loans consisted primarily of $8.1 million of
non-accrual real estate loans and $4.5 million of non-accrual consumer and other
loans.
REO. At September 30, 1998, the bank's REO totaled $65.4 million, after
valuation allowances on such assets of $153.6 million, as set forth in the
following table:
Balance Balance Balance
# of Before All After Percent
(Dollars in Proper- Gross Charge- Valuation Valuation Valuation of
thousands) ties Balance offs Allowances Allowances Allowances Total
- -------------- ------- -------- ------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------
Communities 5 $239,716 $40,310 $199,406 $144,642 $54,764 83.7%
Residential
ground....... 3 6,987 493 6,494 3,122 3,372 5.2%
Commercial
ground..... 3 17,691 7,646 10,045 5,800 4,245 6.5%
Single-family
residential
properties. 19 3,209 182 3,027 -- 3,027 4.6%
- -------------- ------- -------- ------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------
Total REO 30 $267,603 $48,631 $218,972 $153,564 $65,408 100.0%
======= ======== ======= ========== ========== ========== =======
During fiscal 1998, REO decreased $25.3 million, which was attributable to $12.5
million of sales in the Communities and other residential properties, partially
offset by additional capitalized costs, and $12.8 million of additional
valuation allowances.
During fiscal 1998, the bank received revenues of $32.5 million from
dispositions of 422 residential lots or units in the Communities for $21.6
million, approximately 75 acres of commercial land in two of the Communities
and four commercial ground properties for $6.1 million and various single-family
residential properties for $4.8 million.
At September 30, 1998, the bank had an executed contract to sell one residential
ground property at its book value of $1.3 million at that date. The bank's
objective with respect to its REO is to sell such properties as expeditiously as
possible and in a manner which will best preserve the value of the bank's
assets. The bank's ability to achieve this objective will depend on a number of
factors, some of which are beyond its control, such as the general economic
conditions in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
The principal component of REO consists of the five Communities, four of which
are under active development. At September 30, 1998, two of the active
Communities had 1,883 remaining residential lots, of which 927 lots, or 49.2%,
were under contract and pending settlement. Four of the active Communities had
approximately 249 remaining acres of land designated for commercial use, of
which one acre, or 0.4%, was under contract and pending settlement. In addition,
at September 30, 1998, the bank was engaged in discussions with potential
purchasers regarding the sale of additional residential units and retail land.
The following chart provides historical sales information regarding the four
active Communities:
Property Location Residential Lots Commercial Ground (Acres)
---------------------- --------------------------
Under Under
Total Sold Contract Total Sold Contract
----- ---- -------- ------ ------ --------
Loudoun County, VA 5,056 3,496 767 213.25 18.54 1.00
Loudoun County, VA 2,042 2,042 -- 24.10 8.00 --
Montgomery County, MD 1,818 1,495 160 70.65 66.05 --
Loudoun County, VA 4,352 4,352 -- 118.37 84.48 --
----------------------- -----------------------
Total 13,268 11,385 927 426.37 177.07 1.00
======================= =======================
In addition to the four active Communities, REO includes a fifth Community,
consisting of approximately 2,000 acres, in Loudoun County, Virginia, which is
in the pre-development stage and was to be developed into approximately 6,200
residential units.
The bank capitalizes costs relating to development and improvement of REO.
Interest costs are capitalized on real estate properties under development.
During fiscal 1998, the bank capitalized interest in the amount of $2.0 million
relating to its four active Communities.
The bank will continue to monitor closely its major non-performing and potential
problem assets in light of current and anticipated market conditions. The bank's
asset workout group focuses its efforts in resolving these problem assets as
expeditiously as possible. The bank does not anticipate any significant
increases in non-performing and potential problem assets.
Potential Problem Assets. Although not considered non-performing assets,
primarily because the loans are not 90 or more days past due and the borrowers
have not abandoned control of the properties, potential problem assets are
experiencing problems sufficient to cause management to have serious doubts as
to the ability of the borrowers to comply with present repayment terms. At
September 30, 1998 and 1997, none of the bank's assets were deemed by management
to be potential problem assets.
Delinquent Loans. At September 30, 1998, delinquent loans totaled $20.7 million,
or 0.7% of loans, compared to $84.6 million, or 3.5% of loans, at September 30,
1997. The following table sets forth information regarding the bank's delinquent
loans at September 30, 1998.
Principal Balance
-----------------------------------
Total as a
(Dollars in Mortgage Non-Mortgage Percentage
thousands) Loans Loans Total of Loans (1)
- -------------------- ---------- ------------ --------- ------------
Loans delinquent
for:
30-59 days....... $ 3,486 $ 11,777 $ 15,263 0.5%
60-89 days....... 1,582 3,866 5,448 0.2%
---------- ---------- --------- ----------
Total............ $ 5,068 $ 15,643 $ 20,711 0.7%
========== ========== ========= ==========
- --------------------------
(1) Includes loans held for sale and/or securitization, before deduction of
valuation allowances, unearned premiums and discounts and deferred loan
origination fees (costs).
Mortgage loans classified as delinquent 30-89 days consists entirely of
single-family permanent residential mortgage loans and home equity credit line
loans. Total delinquent mortgage loans decreased to $5.1 million at September
30, 1998, from $8.5 million at September 30, 1997.
Non-mortgage loans delinquent 30-89 days decreased to $15.6 million at September
30, 1998 from $50.4 million at September 30, 1997, and decreased as a percentage
of total non-mortgage loans outstanding to 2.5% at September 30, 1998 from 3.4%
at September 30, 1997. The decreased percentage of delinquent non-mortgage loans
to total non-mortgage loans outstanding resulted primarily from the sale of the
bank's credit card portfolio on September 30, 1998.
Troubled Debt Restructurings. A troubled debt restructuring occurs when the bank
agrees to modify significant terms of a loan in favor of the borrower when the
borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. In aggregate, troubled debt
restructurings totaled $11.8 million and $11.9 million at September 30, 1998 and
1997.
At September 30, 1998, loans accounted for as troubled debt restructurings
included one commercial permanent loan with a principal balance of $11.7 million
and one commercial collateralized loan with a principal balance of $0.1 million.
The $0.1 million decrease in loans accounted for as troubled debt restructurings
from September 30, 1997, was a result of net principal reductions. At September
30, 1998, the bank had commitments to lend $0.1 million of additional funds on
loans that have been restructured.
Real Estate Held for Investment. At September 30, 1998 and 1997, real estate
held for investment consisted of two properties with an aggregate book value of
$3.6 million, net of valuation allowances of $0.2 million.
Allowances for Losses. The following tables show loss experience by asset type
and the components of the allowance for losses on loans and the allowance for
losses on real estate held for investment or sale. These tables reflect
charge-offs taken against assets during the years indicated and may include
charge-offs taken against assets which the bank disposed of during such years.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Analysis of Allowance for and Charge-offs of Loans
(Dollars in thousands)
Year Ended September 30,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year $ 105,679 $ 95,523 $ 60,496 $ 50,205 $ 68,040
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Provision for loan losses 150,829 125,115 115,740 54,979 29,222
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Increase due to acquisition of loans -- 118 -- -- --
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Reduction due to sale of credit card portfolio (87,609) -- -- -- --
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Charge-offs:
Single family residential and home equity (1,629) (1,014) (867) (1,174) (1,641)
Commercial real estate and multifamily -- -- -- -- (112)
Real estate construction and ground -- -- -- (1,768) (2,474)
Credit card (108,289) (115,835) (84,805) (50,172) (55,754)
Consumer (12,734) (9,657) (6,375) (3,463) (1,058)
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Total charge-offs (122,652) (126,506) (92,047) (56,577) (61,039)
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Recoveries:
Single family residential and home equity 49 34 32 20 --
Credit card 12,732 10,365 10,720 11,219 13,525
Consumer 1,129 1,030 582 650 457
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Total recoveries 13,910 11,429 11,334 11,889 13,982
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Charge-offs, net of recoveries (108,742) (115,077) (80,713) (44,688) (47,057)
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Balance at end of year $ 60,157 $ 105,679 $ 95,523 $ 60,496 $ 50,205
============ ============ =========== =========== ==========
Provision for loan losses to average loans (1) 5.43% 3.50% 3.94% 1.85% 1.08%
Net loan charge-offs to average loans (1) 3.92% 3.22% 2.75% 1.51% 1.74%
Ending allowance for losses on loans to total
loans (1) (2) 2.17% 4.14% 2.81% 2.05% 1.97%
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Includes loans held for sale and/or securitization.
(2) Before deduction of allowance for losses.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Components of Allowance for Losses on Loans by Type
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
-------------------- --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
of of of of of
Loans to Loans to Loans to Loans to Loans to
Total Total Total Total Total
Amount Loans Amount Loans Amount Loans Amount Loans Amount Loans
---------- -------- ----------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at end
of year allocated
to:
Single family
residential $ 1,822 65.7 % $ 661 33.2 % $ 925 47.2 % $ 929 47.3 % $ 1,384 53.7 %
Home equity 676 4.9 683 3.7 446 0.9 164 1.0 133 1.4
Commercial real
estate and
multifamily 10,828 2.7 7,705 2.1 8,398 2.3 8,523 2.9 8,506 3.3
Real estate
construction
and ground 3,225 3.9 550 2.2 1,255 1.9 1,264 1.1 4,062 2.1
Commercial 3,623 6.3 364 3.9 223 1.7 65 0.5 505 0.2
Credit card -- -- 89,446 42.3 79,681 33.0 46,325 34.4 34,530 25.5
Automobile 29,044 12.9 3,080 9.0 3,965 9.0 3,226 8.1 1,085 11.4
Home improvement
and related loans 3,403 2.4 2,415 2.2 229 2.9 -- 3.8 -- 1.5
Overdraft lines
of credit and
other consumer 1,674 1.2 775 1.4 401 1.1 -- 0.9 -- 0.9
Unallocated 5,862 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total $ 60,157 $ 105,679 $ 95,523 $ 60,496 $ 50,205
========== =========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Analysis of Allowance for and Charge-offs of
Real Estate Held for Investment or Sale
(In thousands)
Year Ended September 30,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year:
Real estate held for investment $ 198 $ 191 $ 193 $ 9,899 $ 10,182
Real estate held for sale 140,738 126,519 135,043 109,074 101,462
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total 140,936 126,710 135,236 118,973 111,644
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Provision for real estate losses:
Real estate held for investment 4 7 (2) (6,974) (283)
Real estate held for sale 18,856 19,616 26,343 33,295 14,335
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total 18,860 19,623 26,341 26,321 14,052
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Charge-offs:
Real estate held for investment:
Ground -- -- -- (2,732) --
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Real estate held for sale:
Commercial real estate and multifamily -- -- -- -- (5,812)
Real estate construction -- -- -- (4,396) (911)
Ground (6,030) (5,397) (34,867) (2,930) --
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total (6,030) (5,397) (34,867) (7,326) (6,723)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total charge-offs on real estate
held for investment or sale (6,030) (5,397) (34,867) (10,058) (6,723)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of year:
Real estate held for investment 202 198 191 193 9,899
Real estate held for sale 153,564 140,738 126,519 135,043 109,074
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total $ 153,766 $ 140,936 $ 126,710 $ 135,236 $ 118,973
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Components of Allowance for Losses
on Real Estate Held for Investment or Sale
(In thousands)
September 30,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for losses on real estate held
for investment:
Commercial real estate and multifamily $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 7,793
Ground -- -- -- -- 1,975
Other 202 198 191 193 131
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total 202 198 191 193 9,899
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Allowance for losses on real estate held
for sale:
Single family residential and home equity -- -- 120 186 70
Commercial real estate and multifamily -- -- -- -- 142
Real estate construction -- -- -- -- 3,158
Communities 144,641 132,905 114,561 108,657 79,921
Residential ground 3,123 1,040 5,944 20,736 19,145
Commercial ground 5,800 6,793 5,894 5,464 6,638
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total 153,564 140,738 126,519 135,043 109,074
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total allowance for losses on real
estate held for investment or sale $ 153,766 $ 140,936 $ 126,710 $ 135,236 $ 118,973
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The bank maintains valuation allowances for estimated losses on loans and real
estate. The bank's total valuation allowances for losses on loans and real
estate held for investment or sale decreased by $32.7 million from the level at
September 30, 1997, to $213.9 million at September 30, 1998. The $32.7 million
decrease was primarily attributable to an $87.6 million reduction in allowances
due to the sale of the bank's credit card portfolio on September 30, 1998.
Offsetting this reduction were increased valuation allowances on consumer loans
and the Communities.
The allowance for losses on loans secured by real estate and real estate held
for investment or sale totaled $170.3 million at September 30, 1998, which
constituted 75.0% of total non-performing real estate assets, before valuation
allowances. This amount represented a $19.8 million increase from the September
30, 1997 level of $150.5 million, or 62.5% of total non-performing real estate
assets, before valuation allowances at that date.
During fiscal 1998, the bank provided an additional $4.2 million of general
valuation allowances pursuant to its policy of providing additional general
valuation allowances which were equal to, or exceeded, the amount of the net
earnings generated by the development and sale of land in the Communities.
When real estate collateral securing an extension of credit is initially
recorded as REO, it is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less
estimated selling costs, on the basis of an appraisal. As circumstances change,
it may be necessary to provide additional valuation allowances based on new
information. The allowance for losses on real estate held for sale at September
30, 1998 is in addition to approximately $48.6 million of cumulative charge-offs
previously taken against assets remaining in the bank's portfolio at September
30, 1998.
The bank from time to time obtains updated appraisals on its real estate
acquired in settlement of loans, including the Communities. As a result of such
updated appraisals, the bank could be required to increase its valuation
allowances. The bank may also increase its allowances for losses after
considering local market conditions, including the bank's efforts to sell
individual properties or portions of properties. In addition to ongoing sales of
lots, management periodically receives and reviews offers to purchase various
parcels of these Communities. If information is deemed credible and can be
supported with market comparables, additional allowances for losses may be
provided.
As of September 30, 1998 and 1997, the bank's real estate held for sale
consisted primarily of five residential communities under development by the
bank. The balance of REO decreased from $90.7 million at September 30, 1997 to
$65.4 million at September 30, 1998 primarily as a result of the sale of
residential and commercial property within the Communities. Sales during the
year ended September 30, 1998 included 422 residential lots, 75 acres of
commercial land and 4 commercial lots.
In accordance with bank regulatory requirements, the Bank performs ongoing real
estate evaluations for all REO as a basis for substantiating the carrying values
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. As indicated, as of
September 30, 1998 and 1997, the bank's REO consisted primarily of residential
communities under active development. While the overall strategy of the bank is
the expedient sale of the real estate assets, on an ongoing basis the bank is
actively funding, managing and overseeing substantive land development
activities in the Communities. As a part of its development activities, the bank
maintains and updates real estate project evaluations in accordance with
regulatory requirements which include analyses of lot and acreage sales, status
and budgets for development activities and consideration of project market
trends. These real estate evaluations are reviewed periodically as part of
management's review and evaluation of the carrying values of REO. Following a
review of the real estate assets and the related carrying values, management
reports its actions to the bank's board of directors.
As of September 30, 1997, two of the Communities included approximately 2,330
residential lots of which 438 were under contract for sale. As of September 30,
1998, these two Communities included 1,883 residential lots of which 927 were
under contract. As of September 30 1997, four of the Communities included 259
commercial acres of which 27 were under contract for sale. At September 30,
1998, these Communities included approximately 249 commercial acres of which one
acre was under contract. One Community in the pre-development stage as of
September 30, 1997 and 1998 included land for development into 6,200 residential
lots. Based on the real estate asset evaluations, the status of the development
Communities as of September 30, 1998 and 1997 and the process referred to above,
management believes that the REO balances are presented in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles at those dates. The bank's assets,
particularly REO, are subject to review by the OTS in conjunction with periodic
examinations. Based upon these examinations, management believes the assets are
presented in accordance with regulatory requirements as of September 30, 1998
and 1997.
Net charge-offs of credit card loans for fiscal 1998 were $95.6 million,
compared to $105.5 million for fiscal 1997. The decrease in net charge-offs
reflected management's implementation of more stringent underwriting and other
lending policies designed to reduce such losses. The allowance at any balance
sheet date related only to receivable balances that existed as of that date.
Because of the nature of a revolving credit card account, the cardholder may
have entered into transactions, such as retail purchases and cash advances,
subsequent to a balance sheet date which increased the outstanding balance of
the account. Accordingly, charge-offs in any fiscal period related both to
balances and conditions or events that existed at the beginning of the period
and to balances created during the period, and may therefore have exceeded the
levels of valuation allowances established at the beginning of the fiscal
period.
The allowance for losses on consumer loans, including automobile, home
improvement, overdraft lines of credit and other consumer loans, increased to
$34.1 million at September 30, 1998 from $6.3 million at September 30, 1997.
Management increased the allowance for losses on automobile loans from $3.1
million ,or 1.3% of outstanding loans, to $29.0 million, or 8.1%, primarily
because of adverse trends in delinquencies and losses in the subprime segment of
the automobile loan portfolio and an increase in the size of this portfolio.
Losses in this portfolio increased from $3.2 million, or 3.7% of average loans,
in fiscal 1997 to $7.0 million, or 5.0% of average loans, in fiscal 1998.
However, the amount of loans in the bank's portfolio has increased from $116.6
million at September 30, 1997, to $236.5 million at September 30, 1998 and, on a
six month lagged basis, the annualized loss rate for the September quarter was
9.76%. Management believes that this lagged loss rate is a better indication of
losses inherent in this portfolio because the portfolio contains a higher
proportion of new loans as a result of its recent growth and losses are
generally not experienced on automobile loans until the loans are five to seven
months seasoned. Although management has taken steps in recent months to
mitigate losses in this portfolio, including expansion of collection efforts and
adjustment of underwriting criteria, losses are not expected to show improvement
until the second half of fiscal 1999. Accordingly, based on recent experience,
management increased the allowance for losses at September 30, 1998.
Asset and Liability Management. A key element of banking is the monitoring and
management of liquidity risk and interest-rate risk. The process of planning and
controlling asset and liability mix, volume and maturity to stabilize the net
interest spread is referred to as asset and liability management. The objective
of asset and liability management is to maximize the net interest yield within
the constraints imposed by prudent lending and investing practices, liquidity
needs and capital planning.
The bank's assets and liabilities are inherently sensitive to changes in
interest rates. These movements can result in variations to the overall level of
income and market value of equity. Based on the characteristics of a specific
asset or liability, including maturity, repricing frequency and interest caps, a
change in interest rates can significantly affect the contribution to net income
and market value for the instrument. If, in the aggregate, the bank's assets
mature or reprice more quickly or to a greater extent than its liabilities, the
bank is termed asset sensitive and will tend to experience increased income and
market value during periods of rising interest rates and declining income and
value during periods of falling interest rates. Conversely, if the bank's
liabilities mature or reprice more quickly or to a greater extent than its
assets, the bank is termed liability sensitive and will tend to experience
decreased income and market value during periods of rising interest rates and
increased income and value during periods of falling interest rates.
The bank pursues an asset-liability management strategy designed both to control
risk from changes in market interest rates and to maximize interest income in
its loan portfolio. To achieve this strategy, the bank emphasized the
origination and retention of a mix of both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loan
products. In addition to adjustable-rate mortgages and adjustable-rate home
equity credit line loans, fixed-rate mortgage loans were originated and retained
in the bank's portfolio during fiscal 1998 to a significantly larger degree than
in prior years. At September 30, 1998, adjustable-rate loans accounted for 36.0%
of total loans compared to 79.5% in fiscal 1997.
Declining interest rates throughout 1998 contributed to an increased demand for
fixed-rate loan products. Due to this rising demand, the bank increased its
volume of fixed-rate mortgage originations as adjustable-rate loan demand fell.
The bank continuously monitors its sensitivity to changes in market interest
rates and attempts to minimize the impact of interest-rate changes to net
income. The bank's policy is generally to sell, or have the ability to sell,
some portion of its long-term fixed-rate mortgage production in order to reduce
its exposure to market interest rate fluctuations typically associated with
long-term fixed-rate lending.
A traditional measure of interest-rate risk within the banking industry is the
interest sensitivity gap, which is the sum of all interest-earning assets minus
all interest-bearing liabilities subject to repricing within the same period.
Gap analysis is a tool used by management to evaluate interest-rate risk which
results from the difference between repricing and maturity characteristics of
the bank's assets and those of the liabilities that fund them. By analyzing
these differences, management can attempt to estimate how changes in interest
rates affect the bank's future net interest income.
The bank views control over interest rate sensitivity as a key element in its
financial planning process and monitors interest rate sensitivity through its
forecasting system. The bank manages interest rate exposure and will narrow or
widen its gap, depending on its perception of interest rate movements and the
composition of its balance sheet. For the reasons discussed above, the bank
might take action to narrow its gap if it believes that market interest rates
will experience a significant prolonged increase, and might widen its gap if it
believes that market interest rates will decline or remain relatively stable.
A number of asset and liability management strategies are available to the bank
in structuring its balance sheet. These include selling or retaining certain
portions of the bank's current residential mortgage loan production; altering
the bank's pricing on certain deposit products to emphasize or de-emphasize
particular maturity categories; altering the type and maturity of securities
acquired for the bank's investment portfolio when replacing securities following
normal portfolio maturation and turnover; lengthening or shortening the maturity
or repricing terms for any current period asset securitizations; and altering
the maturity or interest rate reset profile of borrowed funds, if any, including
funds borrowed from the FHLB of Atlanta.
The following table presents the interest rate sensitivity of the bank's
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at September 30, 1998,
which reflects management's estimate of mortgage loan prepayments and
amortization and provisions for adjustable interest rates. Adjustable and
floating rate loans are included in the period in which their interest rates are
next scheduled to adjust, and prepayment rates are assumed for the bank's loans
based on recent actual experience. Statement savings and passbook accounts with
balances under $20,000 are classified based upon management's assumed attrition
rate of 17.5%, and those with balances of $20,000 or more, as well as all NOW
accounts, are assumed to be subject to repricing within six months or less.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Interest Rate Sensitivity Table (Gap)
(Dollars in thousands)
More than More than More than
Six Months One Year Three Years
Six Months through through through More than
or Less One Year Three Years Five Years Five Years Total
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
As of September 30, 1998 real
estate loans:
Adjustable-rate $ 401,081 $ 326,382 $ 21,576 $ 231 $ -- $ 749,270
Fixed-rate 48,532 46,130 174,593 141,643 762,744 1,173,642
Home equity credit lines
and second mortgages 148,049 1,952 6,868 5,617 22,224 184,710
Commercial 124,165 6,404 21,793 15,109 6,241 173,712
Consumer and other 66,588 50,812 122,747 59,070 13,563 312,780
Loans held for sale 56,287 -- -- -- -- 56,287
Loans held for securitization
and sale 125,000 -- -- -- -- 125,000
Mortgage-backed securities 621,933 326,273 707,332 134,102 236,177 2,025,817
Trading securities 11,319 -- -- -- -- 11,319
Other investments 1,055,904 -- 43,999 -- -- 1,099,903
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------
Total interest-earning assets 2,658,858 757,953 1,098,908 355,772 1,040,949 5,912,440
Total non-interest earning assets -- -- -- -- 837,953 837,953
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------
Total assets $ 2,658,858 $ 757,953 $ 1,098,908 $ 355,772 $ 1,878,902 $ 6,750,393
============= ============= ============= ============= =========== ============
Deposits:
Fixed maturity deposits $ 948,564 $ 287,708 $ 230,542 $ 60,846 $ -- $ 1,527,660
NOW, statement and passbook
accounts 1,537,898 43,800 145,882 99,291 211,600 2,038,471
Money market deposit accounts 1,019,570 -- -- -- -- 1,019,570
Borrowings:
Capital notes - subordinated -- -- -- -- 250,000 250,000
Other 792,771 2,887 9,189 13,695 25,669 844,211
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities 4,298,803 334,395 385,613 173,832 487,269 5,679,912
Total non-interest bearing
liabilities -- -- -- -- 605,724 605,724
Stockholders' equity -- -- -- -- 464,757 464,757
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------
Total liabilities &
stockholders' equity $ 4,298,803 $ 334,395 $ 385,613 $ 173,832 $ 1,557,750 $ 6,750,393
============= ============= ============= ============= =========== ============
Gap $ (1,639,945) $ 423,558 $ 713,295 $ 181,940 $ 553,680
Cumulative gap $ (1,639,945) $ (1,216,387) $ (503,092) $ (321,152) $ 232,528
Adjustment for interest rate
caps (1) $ 200,926 $ 100,000 $ -- $ -- $ --
Adjusted cumulative gap $ (1,439,019) $ (1,116,387) $ (503,092) $ (321,152) $ 232,528
Adjusted cumulative gap as a
percentage of total assets (21.3)% (16.5)% (7.5)% (4.8)% 3.4 %
(1) At September 30, 1998, the bank had $205,556 notional amount of interest
rate caps. The adjustments reflect the average notional amount outstanding for
each period until the last cap expires June 30, 1999.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The one-year gap, adjusted for the effect of the bank's interest rate caps, as a
percentage of total assets, was a negative 16.6% at September 30, 1998, compared
to 4.5% at September 30, 1997. The decline in the bank's one-year gap was
primarily attributable to an increase in fixed-rate mortgage loans during fiscal
1998 which were funded primarily by short-term borrowings.
During fiscal 1995, the bank purchased a series of interest rate caps designed
to limit its exposure to rising short-term interest rates during a four-year
period which began July 1, 1995 and will end June 30, 1999. The bank's Interest
Rate Sensitivity Table reflects the reduction in risk provided by these caps.
The initial level of the protection was a notional principal amount of $600
million, and such protection declined to $205.6 million at September 30, 1998,
and will decline to $200 million by March 31, 1999. The remaining $200 million
of protection will expire on June 30, 1999. In the event that the one-month
London Inter-Bank Offered Rate exceeds 7.00% on certain predetermined
dates, the bank is entitled to receive compensatory payments from the cap
provider, which is a counterparty receiving the highest investment rating from
Standard & Poor's Corporation. Such payments would be equal to the product of
(1) the amount by which one-month LIBOR exceeds 7.00% and (2) the then
outstanding notional principal amount for a predetermined period of time. The
bank has no obligation to make payments to the provider of the cap or any other
party.
During fiscal 1997, an additional interest rate cap agreement with a notional
amount of $5.6 million and $72.2 million at September 30, 1998 and 1997 was
transferred and assigned to the bank at the termination of one of the bank's
credit card securitization transactions. This interest rate cap agreement
terminated October 15, 1998.
In addition to gap measurements, the bank measures and manages interest-rate
risk with the extensive use of computer simulation. This simulation includes
calculations of Market Value of Portfolio Equity and Net Interest Margin as
promulgated by the OTS's Thrift Bulletin 13. Under this regulation,
institutions are required to establish limits on the sensitivity of their net
interest income and net portfolio value to parallel changes in interest
rates. Such changes in interest rates are defined as instantaneous and sustained
movements to rates in 100 basis point increments. The following table shows the
estimated impact of parallel shifts in interest rates at September 30, 1998,
calculated in a manner consistent with the requirements of TB 13.
<PAGE>
Change In
---------------------------------------
Change in Interest Net Interest Net Portfolio
Rates Income(1) Value(2)
(Basis Points)
- --------------------- ------------------ -------------------
(Dollars in thousands)
Percent Amount Percent Amount
------- --------- ------- ----------
+ 200 (11.2)% $(25,767) (11.0)% $(102,239)
+ 100 (5.0)% $(11,567) (2.7)% $(25,576)
- 100 12.1 % $27,859 7.3 % $68,007
- 200 20.3 % $46,799 12.0 % $112,045
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Represents the difference between net interest income for 12 months in a
stable interest rate environment and the various interest rate scenarios.
(2) Represents the difference between net portfolio value (NPV) of the bank's
equity in a stable interest rate environment and the NPV in the various rate
scenarios. The OTS defines NPV as the present value of expected net cash flows
from existing assets minus the present value of expected existing liabilities
plus the present value of expected net cashflows from existing off-balance sheet
contracts.
Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are
based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest
rates, prepayments and deposit run-offs and should not be relied upon as
indicative of actual results. Certain limitations are inherent in such
computations. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturity
or periods of repricing, they may react at different times and in different
degrees to changes in the market interest rates. The interest rates on certain
types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market
interest rates, while rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag
behind changes in market interest rates. Certain assets, such as adjustable rate
mortgage loans, generally have features which restrict changes in their interest
rates on a short term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of a
change in interest rates, loan prepayments and early deposit withdrawal levels
could deviate significantly from those assumed in making the calculations set
forth above. Additionally, credit risk may increase if an interest rate increase
adversely affects the ability of many borrowers to service their debt.
At September 30, 1998, the bank would not have been required to maintain
additional amounts of risk-based capital had the interest-rate risk component of
the OTS capital regulations been in effect. See "Business - Regulation
Regulatory Capital."
In December 1998, the Office of Thrift Supervision released Management of
Interest Rate Risk, Investment Securities, and Derivatives Analysis to
replace prior thrift bulletins concerned with the measurement of interest rate
risk. The bank currently measures interest-rate risk and the effect of changes
in interest rates on both net interest income and market value on a regular
basis. TB13a requires the bank to modify its existing interest-rate risk
analyses to include a new measure, Net Portfolio Value Ratio, and to measure the
sensitivity of this ratio through interest rate shock scenarios. The bank is
currently in the process of reviewing TB13a and incorporating this new
measurement into its regular analyses; however, based on a preliminary review of
TB13a and its impact to the bank's measurement of interest rate sensitivity,
management believes its impact will be minimal.
Nevertheless, the sale of the bank's credit card portfolio and current market
conditions are likely to result in a higher proportion of the bank's assets
being comprised of assets with longer durations and greater sensitivity to
market interest rates than credit card loans. Accordingly, management expects to
consider steps it can take during fiscal 1999 to reduce to some degree the
bank's exposure to increases in market interest rates based on the change in
composition of the bank's loan portfolio.
Inflation. The impact of inflation on the bank is different from the impact on
an industrial company, because substantially all of the assets and liabilities
of the bank are monetary in nature. The most direct impact of an extended period
of inflation would be to increase interest rates, and to place upward pressure
on the operating expenses of the bank. However, the actual effect of inflation
on the net interest income of the bank would depend on the extent to which the
bank was able to maintain a spread between the average yield on interest-earning
assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which would depend
to a significant extent on its asset-liability sensitivity. The effect of
inflation on the bank's results of operations for the past three fiscal years
has been minimal.
Deferred Tax Asset. At September 30, 1998, the bank recorded a net deferred tax
asset of $81.6 million, which generally represents the cumulative excess of the
bank's actual income tax liability over its income tax expense for financial
reporting purposes. Management provides a valuation allowance to reduce the net
deferred tax asset to an amount that management concludes is more likely than
not to be realized. As of September 30, 1998, the bank had a valuation allowance
totaling $10.5 million against its net deferred tax asset. Management believes
that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will be realized
through future federal taxable income of the bank during periods in which the
temporary differences reverse. However, should the bank generate future taxable
losses in fiscal 1999 and 2000, the net deferred tax asset may be realized in
part through the carryback of such losses and the refund of taxes paid in fiscal
1998 and 1997.
Tax Sharing Payments. During fiscal 1998, after receiving OTS approval, the bank
made tax sharing payments totaling $5.6 million to the Trust. Subsequent to
September 30, 1998, the bank made a tax sharing payment of $6.6 million to the
Trust. See Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Capital. At September 30, 1998, the bank was in compliance with all of its
regulatory capital requirements under FIRREA, and its capital ratios exceeded
the ratios established for well capitalized institutions under OTS prompt
corrective action regulations.
The following table shows the bank's regulatory capital levels at September 30,
1998, in relation to the regulatory requirements in effect at that date. The
information below is based upon the bank's understanding of the regulations and
interpretations currently in effect and may be subject to change.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Regulatory Capital
(Dollars in thousands)
Minimum Excess
Actual Capital Requirement Capital
------------------------ ---------------------- -----------------------
As a % As a % As a %
Amount of Assets Amount of Assets Amount of Assets
----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Stockholders' equity per financial statements $ 464,757
Minority interest in REIT Subsidiary (1) 144,000
Net unrealized holding gains (2) (58)
-----------
608,699
Adjustments for tangible and core capital:
Intangible assets (63,144)
Non-allowable minority interest in
REIT Subsidiary (1) (11,433)
Non-includable subsidiaries (3) (3,852)
-----------
Total tangible capital 530,270 7.93% $ 100,253 1.50% $ 430,017 6.43%
----------- ========= =========== ========= =========== =========
Total core capital (4) 530,270 7.93% $ 267,342 4.00% $ 262,928 3.93%
----------- ========= =========== ========= =========== =========
Tier 1 risk-based capital (4) 530,270 12.93% $ 172,572 4.00% $ 357,698 8.93%
----------- ========= =========== ========= =========== =========
Adjustments for total risk-based capital:
Subordinated capital debentures 250,000
Allowance for general loan losses 53,036
-----------
Total supplementary capital 303,036
-----------
Total available capital 833,306
Equity investments (3) (11,133)
-----------
Total risk-based capital (4) $ 822,173 20.70% $ 345,143 8.00% $ 477,030 12.70%
=========== ========= =========== ========= =========== =========
(1) Eligible for inclusion in core capital in an amount up to 25% of the bank's
core capital pursuant to authorization from the OTS.
(2) Pursuant to OTS policy, net unrealized holding gains (losses) are excluded
from regulatory capital.
(3) Reflects an aggregate offset of $0.8 million representing the allowance for
general loan losses maintained against the bank's equity investments and
non-includable subsidiaries which, pursuant to OTS guidelines, is available as a
"credit" against the deductions from capital otherwise required for such
investments.
(4) Under the OTS "prompt corrective action" regulations, the standards for
classification as "well capitalized" are a leverage (or "core capital") ratio of
at least 5.0%, a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0% and a total
risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
OTS capital regulations provide a five-year holding period, or such longer
period as may be approved by the OTS, for REO to qualify for an exception from
treatment as an equity investment. If an REO property is considered an equity
investment, its then-current book value is deducted from total risk-based
capital. Accordingly, if the bank is unable to dispose of any REO property,
whether through bulk sales or otherwise, prior to the end of its applicable
five-year holding period and is unable to obtain an extension of such five-year
holding period from the OTS, the bank could be required to deduct the
then-current book value of such REO property from total risk-based capital. In
February 1998, the bank received from the OTS an extension of the holding
periods for certain of its REO properties through February 17, 1999. The
following table sets forth the bank's REO at September 30, 1998, after valuation
allowances of $153.6 million, by the fiscal year in which the property was
acquired through foreclosure.
Fiscal Year (In
thousands)
--------------------------- ------------
1990(1)(2)............... $ 19,023
1991(2).................. 36,619
1992(2).................. 100
1993..................... --
1994..................... 732
1995..................... 5,907
1996..................... --
1997..................... --
1998..................... 3,027
------------
Total REO................ $ 65,408
============
(1) Includes REO with an aggregate net book value of $11.1 million, which the
bank treats as equity investments for regulatory capital purposes.
(2) Includes REO, with an aggregate net book value of $44.6 million, for which
the bank received an extension of the holding periods through February 17, 1999.
Under the OTS prompt corrective action regulations, an institution is
categorized as well capitalized if it has a leverage or core capital ratio of
at least 5.0%, a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0%, a total
risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0% and is not subject to any written
agreement, order, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive to
meet and maintain a specific capital level. At September 30, 1998, the bank's
leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios were 7.93%,
12.93% and 20.70% which exceeded the ratios established for well capitalized
institutions. The OTS has the discretion to reclassify an institution from one
category to the next lower category, for example from well capitalized to
adequately capitalized, if, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the
OTS determines that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or has
received and has not corrected a less than satisfactory examination rating for
asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity.
Failure to obtain the REO extensions discussed above could adversely affect the
bank's regulatory capital ratios. The bank's ability to maintain or increase its
capital levels in future periods also will be subject to general economic
conditions, particularly in the bank's local markets. Adverse general economic
conditions or a renewed downturn in local real estate markets could require
further additions to the bank's allowances for losses and further charge-offs.
Any such developments would adversely affect the bank's earnings and thus its
regulatory capital levels.
<PAGE>
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
General. The Real Estate Trust's primary cash requirements include operating
expenses, debt service, debt principal repayment and capital expenditures.
During fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Real Estate Trust generated positive cash
flow from operating activities, including the receipt of dividends and tax
sharing payments from Chevy Chase Bank, and is expected to do so for the
foreseeable future. However, the Real Estate Trust's cash flow from operating
activities has historically been insufficient to pay principal and interest on
its outstanding debt securities and to fund capital expenditures. These
shortfalls have historically been funded through external sources including
additional borrowings and refinancings and proceeds from asset sales. Overall,
the Real Estate Trust's ability to generate positive cash flow from operating
activities and to meet its liquidity needs in the future, including debt service
payments, repayment of debt principal and capital expenditures, will continue to
depend on dividends and tax sharing payments from the bank.
The bank's primary cash requirements include its commitment to fund maturing
savings certificates and deposit withdrawals, fund existing and continued loan
commitments, repay borrowings and meet operating expenses. The bank's primary
sources of liquidity historically have consisted of:
o principal and interest payments on loans and
mortgage-backed securities;
o savings deposits;
o sales of loans held for sale and trading securities;
o securitizations; and
o borrowed funds.
Management believes that these liquidity sources are adequate to fund the bank's
liquidity needs without the need to sell any securities classified as "held to
maturity."
Real Estate
Historically, the Real Estate Trust's total cash requirements have exceeded the
cash generated by its operations. This condition is currently the case and is
expected to continue to be so for the foreseeable future. The Real Estate
Trust's internal sources of funds, primarily cash flow generated by its
income-producing properties, generally have been sufficient to meet its cash
needs other than the repayment of principal on outstanding debt, including
outstanding unsecured notes sold to the public, the payment of interest on its
senior secured notes, and the payment of capital improvement costs. In the past,
the Real Estate Trust funded such shortfalls through a combination of external
funding sources, primarily new financings, including the sale of unsecured
notes, refinancings of maturing mortgage debt, asset sales and tax sharing
payments from the bank. See the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included
in the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
The Real Estate Trust's ability to meet its liquidity needs, including debt
service payments in fiscal 1999 and subsequent years, will depend in significant
part on its receipt of dividends from the bank and tax sharing payments from the
bank pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement among the Trust, the bank, and their
subsidiaries. The availability and amount of tax sharing payments and dividends
in future periods is dependent upon, among other things, the bank's operating
performance and income, regulatory restrictions on such payments, including
availability of Trust collateral to support such payments, and, in the case of
tax sharing payments, the continued consolidation of the bank and the bank's
subsidiaries with the Trust for federal income tax purposes. See also the
discussion of potential limitations on the payment of dividends by the bank
contained in "Business - Banking - Regulation Dividends and Other Capital
Distributions."
The Real Estate Trust believes that the financial condition and operating
results of the bank in recent periods, as well as the bank's board resolution
adopted in connection with the release of its written agreement with the OTS
should enhance prospects for the Real Estate Trust to receive tax sharing
payments and dividends from the bank. See "Banking--Regulation--Regulatory
Capital." During fiscal 1998, the bank made tax sharing payments totaling $5.6
million and dividend payments totaling $5.2 million to the Real Estate Trust. In
the first quarter of fiscal 1999, the Bank made a tax sharing payment of $6.6
million and a dividend payment of $16.8 million to the Real Estate Trust.
In recent years, the operations of the Trust have generated net operating losses
while the bank has reported net income. It is anticipated that the Trust's
consolidation of the bank's operations into the Trust's federal income tax
return will result in the use of the Trust's net operating losses to reduce the
federal income taxes the bank would otherwise owe. If in any future year, the
bank has taxable losses or unused credits, the Trust would be obligated to
reimburse the bank for the greater of (1) the tax benefit to the group using
such tax losses or unused tax credits in the group's consolidated federal income
tax returns or (2) the amount of the refund which the bank would otherwise have
been able to claim if it were not being included in the consolidated federal
income tax return of the group.
Through September 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust has purchased either in the
open market or through dividend reinvestment 2,091,176 shares of common stock of
Saul Centers representing 16.4% of such company's outstanding common stock. As
of September 30, 1998, the market value of these unpledged shares was
approximately $35.5 million.
In fiscal 1994, the Real Estate Trust refinanced a significant portion of its
outstanding secured indebtedness with the proceeds of the issuance of $175.0
million aggregate principal amount of 11 5/8% Senior Secured Notes due 2002,
referred to in this report as the "1994 Notes." See Note 4 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
In March 1998, the Real Estate Trust issued $200.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 9 3/4% Senior Secured Notes due 2008, referred to in this report
as the "1998 Notes." After providing for the retirement of the 1994 Notes,
including a prepayment premium of $10.0 million and debt issuance costs of
approximately $5.9 million, the Real Estate Trust realized approximately $9.1
million in new funds. In addition, the Real Estate Trust received about $13.2
million in cash which had been held as additional collateral by the indenture
agent under the 1994 Notes. The 1998 Notes are secured by a first priority
perfected security interest in 8,000 shares, or 80%, of the issued and
outstanding common stock of the bank, which constitute all of the bank common
stock held by the Real Estate Trust. The 1998 Notes are nonrecourse obligations
of the Real Estate Trust.
The Real Estate Trust is currently selling Unsecured Notes, with a maturity
ranging from one to ten years, primarily to provide funds to repay maturing
Unsecured Notes. To the degree that the Real Estate Trust does not sell new
Unsecured Notes in an amount sufficient to finance completely the scheduled
repayment of outstanding Unsecured Notes as they mature, it will finance such
repayments from other sources of funds.
In fiscal 1995, the Real Estate Trust established a $15.0 million secured
revolving credit line with an unrelated bank. This facility was for an initial
two-year period subject to extension for one or more additional one-year terms.
In fiscal 1997, the facility was increased to $20.0 million and was renewed for
an additional two-year period. Interest is computed by reference to a floating
rate index. At September 30, 1998, there were no borrowings under the facility
and unrestricted availability was $8.4 million.
In fiscal 1996, the Real Estate Trust established an $8.0 million secured
revolving credit line with an unrelated bank. This facility was for a one-year
term, after which any outstanding loan amount would amortize over a two-year
period. During fiscal 1997, the line of credit was increased to $10.0 million
and was extended for a year. During fiscal 1998, the line of credit was
increased to $20.0 million and was extended for an additional year. Interest is
computed by reference to a floating rate index. At September 30, 1998, there
were no borrowings under the facility and unrestricted availability was $4.3
million.
During fiscal 1997, the Real Estate Trust refinanced two hotel and three office
properties with five- year floating rate debt. After payment of all financing
costs, the Real Estate Trust received net proceeds of approximately $11.0
million.
<PAGE>
The maturity schedule for the Real Estate Trust's outstanding debt at September
30, 1998 for fiscal years commencing October 1, 1998 is set forth in the
following table:
Debt Maturity Schedule
(In thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes Notes
Fiscal Mortgage Payable- Payable-
Year Notes Secured Unsecured Total
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 $10,055 $ -- $16,149 $ 26,204
2000 10,193 -- 8,893 19,086
2001 12,618 -- 5,916 18,534
2002 14,367 -- 5,284 19,651
2003 12,663 -- 9,046 21,709
Thereafter 138,978 200,000 5,047 344,025
--------- ---------- --------- ----------
Total $198,874 $200,000 $50,335 $449,209
========= ========== ========= ==========
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Of the $198.9 million of mortgage debt outstanding at September 30, 1998, $169.8
million was nonrecourse to the Real Estate Trust.
As the owner, directly and through two wholly-owned subsidiaries, of a 21.5%
limited partnership interest in Saul Holdings Partnership, the Real Estate Trust
shares in cash distributions from operations and from capital transactions
involving the sale of properties. The partnership agreement of Saul Holdings
Partnership provides for quarterly cash distributions to the partners out of net
cash flow. See "Business - Real Estate - Investment in Saul Holdings Limited
Partnership." In fiscal 1998, the Real Estate Trust received total cash
distributions of $5.6 million from Saul Holdings Partnership. Beginning in
April 1998 the Real Estate Trust has reinvested its quarterly distributions and
obtained additional partnership units in Saul Holdings.
Development and Capital Expenditures
During the third quarter of fiscal 1997, the Real Estate Trust commenced
development of a 46,000 square foot single-story office research and development
building on 3 acres of its Avenel Business Park land parcel located in
Gaithersburg, Maryland. The Real Estate Trust financed the project with a
construction/permanent loan. The project was substantially completed in January
1998 and was offered to Saul Holdings in accordance with the Real Estate Trust's
obligations under the Right of First Refusal Agreement. An independent appraisal
of the project indicated a market value of $5,600,000. The fully funded balance
of the loan was $3,657,000, resulting in an equity position of $1,943,000 for
the Real Estate Trust. The Board of Directors of Saul Centers, Inc., general
partner of Saul Holdings, agreed to purchase the Real Estate Trust's equity
position through the issuance of additional limited partnership units in Saul
Holdings. Accordingly, as of April 1, 1998, Saul Holdings insured 105,922 new
limited partnership units and a corresponding limited partnership interest to
the Real Estate Trust in exchange for the ownership of Avenel development
project and the assumption of the loan.
In September 1997, the Real Estate Trust commenced development of a 95-unit
extended stay hotel on a 3 acre parcel located adjacent to its Hampton Inn and
Holiday Inn near the Washington Dulles International Airport in Sterling,
Virginia. The new hotel was franchised as a TownePlace Suites by Marriott and
opened for business in August 1998. Development costs were $5.8 million and were
largely financed by a construction loan of $4.5 million. The loan is for two
years with two extension options for two year and one year periods. The loan
covered all costs except for the land, fees to related parties, taxes and
insurance.
On December 10, 1997, the Real Estate Trust purchased a 308-room Holiday Inn
located in Arlington, Virginia, near the Washington National Airport and the
Real Estate Trust's Howard Johnson Hotel. The purchase price was $25.8 million.
Also on December 10, 1997, the Real Estate Trust refinanced five other hotels in
its portfolio. Funds for the two transactions were provided by a lender in the
amount of $52.5 million. The new loans have a 15 year term, a fixed interest
rate of 7.57%, and amortization based on a 25 year schedule.
During the quarter ended June 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust commenced
development of four new extended stay hotels:
TownePlace Suites by Marriott containing 91 units to be located on a 2 acre
site owned by the Trust in Avenel Business Park in Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Opening is scheduled for mid-April 1999.
TownePlace Suites by Marriott containing 91 units to be located on part of a
9 acre site owned by the Real Estate Trust in the Arvida Park of Commerce
in Boca Raton, Florida. Opening is scheduled for mid-July 1999.
SpringHill Suites by Marriott containing 146-units to be located on part of a
9 acre site owned by the Real Estate Trust in the Arvida Park of Commerce
in Boca Raton, Florida. Opening is scheduled for mid-July 1999.
TownePlace Suites by Marriott containing 95-units to be
located on a 3 acre site owned by the Real Estate Trust in
Ft. Lauderdale Commerce Center, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.
Opening is scheduled for mid-August 1999.
The projected costs for the four hotels aggregate $32 million and will largely
be funded by the proceeds of a three year bank loan in the amount of $25.9
million. The loan has two one-year renewal options.
During the quarter ended June 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust also began
development of a 78,000 square floor single-story office/research and
development building located on a 7 acre site owned by the Real Estate Trust in
Dulles North Corporate Park, Sterling, Virginia. This project is adjacent to the
Real Estate Trust's Dulles North office building and near three of the Real
Estate Trust's hotel properties. The development cost is $6.6 million with bank
financing of $6.5 million for a five-year term and a two-year extension option.
Completion is expected in early fiscal 1999. A lease for approximately 25% of
the space has been signed.
During the quarter ended September 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust began the
conversion of its two hotels located in Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia. The
present 308-room Crystal City Holiday Inn will be converted into a Holiday Inn
Crown Plaza, while the present 279-room Howard Johnsons will be converted into a
Holiday Inn. The new brands are expected to position the hotels to generate
higher room rates and revenues along with improved occupancy levels consistent
with the overall market. The renovations are largely an acceleration of normal
capital improvement work as well as some exterior and interior signage, new
marketing materials and a facade upgrade at the Howard Johnson hotel. A
restaurant, which had been operated by an unaffiliated company, will also be
renovated. The incremental costs for the two conversions will be funded by the
Real Estate Trust in part from its internal resources and in part from its lines
of credit.
The Real Estate Trust believes that the capital improvement costs for its
income-producing properties will be in range of $6.5 to $8.0 million per year
for the next several fiscal years.
Year 2000 Statement - Pursuant to The Year 2000 Information And
Readiness Disclosure Act
The Real Estate Trust has reviewed all its financial and accounting systems, as
well as physical systems with embedded microprocessors, for the purpose of
assessing the impact of Year 2000 on both internally developed and externally
provided systems. The Real Estate Trust currently uses an IBM AS/400, which has
been certified by the manufacturer to be Year 2000 compliant. All software
purchased over the past five years has been certified by the various
manufacturers to be Year 2000 compliant. All internally developed software had
already been modified or will be modified by May 1999 to make it Year 2000
compliant. Property management systems for shopping centers, office buildings,
hotels, and construction and development have been certified as Year 2000
compliant by applicable vendors. At present, only one area of property
management, apartments, has software which requires replacement to meet Year
2000 compliance, and that replacement is scheduled to be completed by May 1999.
The Real Estate Trust had no information which would suggest that its financial
systems would not continue to function effectively after the turn of the
century.
Using the Building Owners and Manager Association's guidelines to identify
building systems, including physical systems with embedded microprocessors, and
critical services that might be vulnerable to the Year 2000 software problem,
the Real Estate Trust has contacted the manufacturer, supplier, or the vendor
supporting the system and requested information regarding Year 2000 compliance.
The majority of the replies have indicated that the systems or services are Year
2000 compliant. We are presently assessing whether any of the internal systems
should be tested or whether further investigation is necessary. The Real Estate
Trust has no information which would suggest that any system would not continue
to function effectively the after turn of the century. Except with regard to
internally developed software, all information regarding Year 2000 compliance is
based on a republication, as defined in The Year 2000 Information and Readiness
Disclosure Act, of Year 2000 statements or disclosures made by others.
The Real Estate Trust believes that there is risk that its operations may be
affected by vendors and tenants who are unable to perform as contracted due to
their own Year 2000 exposure. It is very difficult to identify the most
reasonably likely worst case scenario at this time. Although the Real Estate
Trust's potential exposure is widespread, there is no known major direct
exposure. The Real Estate Trust's commercial leases contain provisions
empowering it to take certain actions to enforce its right to the timely payment
of rent regardless of the tenant's Year 2000 exposure. While it is not possible
at this time to determine the likely impact of these potential problems, the
Real Estate Trust will continue to evaluate these areas and development
contingency plans as appropriate. The Real Estate Trust estimates that its
incremental costs to meet year 2000 compliance is less that $250,000.
Banking
The standard measure of liquidity in the savings industry is the ratio of cash
and short-term U.S. Government and other specified securities to net
withdrawable accounts and borrowings payable in one year or less.
The OTS has established a minimum liquidity requirement, which may vary from
time to time depending upon economic conditions and deposit flows. The required
liquidity level under OTS regulations in effect at September 30, 1998 was 4.0%.
The bank's average liquidity ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 was
10.4%, compared to 11.1% for the month ended September 30, 1997. The bank met
the liquidity level requirements for each quarter of fiscal 1998. Effective
November 24, 1997, the OTS reduced the minimum liquidity requirement to 4% from
5% and changed the reporting requirement to quarterly instead of monthly. See
"Business Regulation - Liquidity Requirements."
The bank's primary sources of funds historically have consisted of:
o principal and interest payments on loans and
mortgage-backed securities;
o savings deposits;
o sales of loans and trading securities;
o securitizations and sales of loans; and
o borrowed funds, including funds borrowed from the FHLB of Atlanta.
The bank's holdings of readily marketable securities constitute another
important source of liquidity. At September 30, 1998, the bank's portfolio
included mortgage loans, U.S. Government securities and mortgage-backed
securities with outstanding principal balances of $103.7 million, $44.0 million
and $2.0 billion. The estimated borrowing capacity against mortgage loans, U.S.
Government securities and mortgage-backed securities that are available to be
pledged to the FHLB of Atlanta and various security dealers totaled $1.9 billion
at September 30, 1998, after market-value and other adjustments.
Chevy Chase has accessed the capital markets as an additional means of funding
its operations and managing its capital ratios and asset growth. Specifically,
the bank has securitized financial assets, including credit card, home equity,
home loan and automobile loan receivables, as well as single-family residential
loans, because such securitizations provide the bank with a source of financing
at competitive rates and assist the bank in maintaining compliance with
regulatory capital requirements. Additionally, the securitizations have
permitted the bank to limit the credit risk associated with these assets while
continuing to earn servicing fees and other income associated with the
securitized assets.
Since 1988, the bank has securitized approximately $13.0 billion of credit card,
home equity, automobile and home loan receivables. These transactions depend on
sophisticated back-office systems to service complex securitization structures
and on personnel with the experience to design, install and manage those
systems. At September 30, 1998, the bank serviced $417.9 million, $1.1 billion
and $204.5 million of securitized home equity, automobile and home loan
receivables. Chevy Chase derives fee-based income from servicing these
securitized portfolios. However, such fee-based income has been adversely
affected in recent periods by increases in delinquencies and charge-offs related
to the receivables placed in these securitized pools.
The bank's securitization transactions transfer the risk of repayment on
securitized assets to a trust which holds the receivables and issues the
asset-backed certificates and ultimately the risk of repayment is transferred to
the holders of those certificates. The bank retains risk with respect to the
assets transferred to the trust only to the extent that it retains recourse
based on the performance of the assets or holds certificates issued by the
trust, such as a "seller certificate". In its securitizations, the bank
typically retains a limited amount of recourse through one or more means, most
often, through the establishment of "spread accounts." Occasionally other
structures, such as overcollateralization of receivables or subordinated
asset-backed securities, are used. Spread accounts are funded by initial
deposits, if required, and by amounts generated by the securitized assets over
and above the amount required to pay interest, defaults and other charges and
fees on the investors' interest in the securitization transaction. Because
amounts on deposit in the spread accounts are at risk depending upon performance
of the securitized receivables, those amounts represent recourse to the bank.
Pursuant to OTS's "low level recourse rule," which sets capital requirements for
assets sold with recourse at the lower of the applicable capital requirement or
the amount of recourse retained, the bank maintains dollar-for-dollar capital
against the securitized assets in the amount of the recourse retained up to the
otherwise applicable capital requirement. Even if defaults on outstanding
receivables significantly exceed projected and historical levels so that a "pay
out event" is triggered, the immediate consequence is that investors will begin
receiving payments of principal from the securitized assets earlier than
originally scheduled. Even if payments are insufficient to repay investors in
full, the bank's assets are not exposed to risk of loss beyond the relevant
amount of recourse retained, including amounts outstanding in the spread
accounts and the amount of any overcollateralization of receivables or
subordinated interest, which, as noted above, constitute a dollar-for-dollar
capital requirement for the bank. The bank also retains risk through the bank's
interest in any seller certificate. Seller certificates share collections on the
securitized assets on an unsubordinated basis with the investor certificates,
unless and to the extent recourse is retained through an express subordination,
and are on-balance sheet assets against which the bank must maintain capital.
In recent periods, the proceeds from the securitization and sale of credit card,
home equity, automobile and home loan receivables have been significant sources
of liquidity for the bank. The bank securitized and sold $1.0 billion of credit
card receivables, $534.7 million of automobile loan receivables, $298.8 million
of home equity receivables and $45.9 million of home loan receivables during
fiscal 1998. Additionally, during fiscal 1998, the bank securitized and sold
$36.0 million of amounts on deposit in certain spread accounts established in
connection with certain of the bank's credit card securitizations. At September
30, 1998, the bank was considering the securitization and sale of approximately
$200.0 million of automobile loan receivables, including $125.0 million of
receivables outstanding at September 30, 1998 and $75.0 million of receivables
which the bank expects to become available through additional fundings during
the six months ending March 31, 1999.
In connection with the sale of the bank's credit card portfolio and related
operations, the bank transferred all of its rights, interests, liabilities and
obligations, including recourse obligations, relating to its credit card
securitizations to FUSA.
As part of its operating strategy, the bank will continue to explore
opportunities to sell assets and to securitize and sell home equity, automobile
and home loan receivables to meet liquidity and other balance sheet objectives.
However, management expects to rely less on securitizations as a source of
liquidity in fiscal 1999 because, among other things, changes in the composition
of the bank's loan portfolio following the sale of its credit card business as
well as changes in market and other conditions have made other sources of
liquidity such as Federal Home Loan bank advances relatively more attractive
sources of funding.
The bank uses its liquidity primarily to meet its commitments to fund maturing
savings certificates and deposit withdrawals, fund existing and continuing loan
commitments, repay borrowings and meet operating expenses. During fiscal 1998,
the bank used the cash provided by operating, investing and financing activities
primarily to meet its commitments to fund maturing savings certificates and
deposit withdrawals of $24.8 billion, repay borrowings of $19.9 billion, fund
existing and continuing loan commitments, including real estate held for
investment or sale, of $3.5 billion, purchase investments and loans of $1.7
billion and meet operating expenses, before depreciation and amortization, of
$464.2 million. These commitments were funded primarily through proceeds from
customer deposits and sales of certificates of deposit of $24.8 billion,
proceeds from borrowings of $20.4 billion, proceeds from sales of loans, trading
securities and real estate of $3.7 billion, and principal and interest collected
on investments, loans, and securities of $1.8 billion.
The bank is obligated under various recourse provisions, primarily in connection
with credit losses, related to the securitization and sale of receivables. As a
result of these recourse provisions, the bank maintained restricted cash
accounts and overcollateralization of receivables amounting to $98.2 million and
$12.2 million at December 31, 1998, and $110.2 million and $12.5 million at
September 30, 1998. In addition, the bank owned subordinated automobile
receivables-backed securities with carrying values of $9.6 million and $11.3
million at December 31, 1998 and September 30, 1998 which were classified as
trading securities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The bank is also obligated under various recourse provisions related to the swap
of single-family residential loans for mortgage-backed securities issued by the
bank. At September 30, 1998, recourse to the bank under these arrangements was
$8.6 million, consisting of restricted cash accounts amounting to $4.1 million
and overcollateralization of receivables of $4.5 million.
The bank's commitments to extend credit at September 30, 1998 are set forth in
the following table:
(In
thousands)
------------
Commitments to originate loans......... $ 266,067
------------
Loans in process (collateralized loans):
Home equity............................ 582,280
Real estate construction and ground.... 100,868
Commercial real estate and multifamily. 1,713
Commercial............................. 69,780
------------
754,641
------------
Loans in process (unsecured loans):....
Overdraft lines........................ 88,665
Commercial............................. 35,560
------------
124,225
============
Total commitments to extend credit..... $1,144,933
============
The sale of the credit card portfolio substantially reduced the bank's level of
commitments to extend credit at September 30, 1998. Based on historical
experience, the bank expects to fund substantially less than the total amount of
its outstanding overdraft line and home equity credit line commitments, which
together accounted for 58.6% of commitments to extend credit at September 30,
1998.
At September 30, 1998, repayments of borrowed money scheduled to occur during
the next 12 months were $795.7 million. Certificates of deposit maturing during
the next 12 months amounted to $1.2 billion, of which a substantial portion is
expected to remain with the bank.
There were no material commitments for capital expenditures at September 30,
1998. During fiscal 1998, the bank leased 3.5 acres of land at 7501 Wisconsin
Avenue in Bethesda, Maryland, on which the bank intends to develop and occupy an
office building to use as its new corporate headquarters. Construction on this
project is scheduled to begin in June 1999.
The bank's liquidity requirements in fiscal 1999 and for years subsequent to
fiscal 1999 will continue to be affected both by the asset size of the bank, the
growth of which may be constrained by capital requirements, and the composition
of the asset portfolio. Management believes that the bank's primary sources of
funds, described above, will be sufficient to meet the bank's foreseeable
long-term liquidity needs. The mix of funding sources utilized from time to time
will be determined by a number of factors, including capital planning
objectives, lending and investment strategies and market conditions.
YEAR 2000 ISSUES
The "Year 2000 problem" is caused by deficiencies in computer systems that are
designed to assume that the first two digits of a particular year are always
"19" and therefore these systems may have difficulty accurately processing
transactions using dates later than December 31, 1999. These deficiencies, if
not properly identified and remediated, could lead to internal and industry-wide
malfunctions and cause substantial business disruptions.
Under the direction of the bank's management, the bank has launched a
corporate-wide Year 2000 program to prepare its internal computer systems,
applications and infrastructure to correctly process dates up through and after
December 31, 1999, and to mitigate external risks to the bank. The program is
supported by a working group that organizes and conducts specific Year 2000
projects, including projects dealing with the bank's facilities, counterparties
and critical vendors and service providers.
The program, which is based on the Federal Financial Institutions Examination
Council's guidelines, consists of five components relating to mission-critical
technology:
1. The awareness phase, which raised internal awareness of
the program;
2. The inventory/assessment phase, during which the bank completed a
corporate-wide inventory of information technology and non-IT applications,
identified key relationships with outside parties and developed plans and target
dates for the program;
3. The renovation/replacement phase, in which the bank identified
components in need of replacement or repair and made hardware and software
upgrades, code enhancements, system replacements and other changes;
4. The validation phase, in which the bank conducted tests of system-wide
applications and evaluated user acceptance; and
5. The implementation phase, in which the bank is converting its systems to
year 2000-tested applications and products.
The awareness, assessment, renovation and validation phases have been completed
and the implementation phase is substantially complete.
The bank is working to mitigate external risks through a variety of projects.
The bank has assessed, and will continue to assess, the Year 2000 readiness of
key counterparties and of customers. In addition, the bank has assessed the Year
2000 readiness of critical vendors and service providers, including
telecommunications, hardware and software, office equipment and financial
services providers.
The bank is developing contingency plans to address problems which may be
created by external parties who may not be Year 2000 compliant. As part of this
effort, the bank is assessing significant services provided by third parties to
determine the extent to which the bank may be affected by inadequate Year 2000
preparedness. The bank plans to identify significant Year 2000 risks, assess the
probability of their occurrence and take necessary actions to mitigate those
risks by developing contingency plans in response to those risks.
The bank does not expect to incur a material loss as a result of the Year 2000
problem. However, because the bank ultimately has no control over the
remediation of systems of third parties with whom the bank has relationships,
there can be no assurance that the bank's program, including its contingency
plans, will fully mitigate the effects of third-party failures.
The bank expects to invest $14.6 million towards the Year 2000 program,
excluding the cost of its own staff, of which $2.3 million was charged to
expense in fiscal 1998 and $6.4 million and $1.0 million will be charged to
expense in fiscal 1999 and fiscal 2000. The bank also expects to invest an
additional $4.8 million in equipment purchases which will be amortized to
expense over the estimated useful lives of the equipment. The bank's cost
estimates are based on variables and assumptions that could cause actual results
to differ from these projections.
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Real Estate Trust's ability to generate revenues from property ownership and
development is significantly influenced by a number of factors, including
national and local economic conditions, the level of mortgage interest rates,
governmental actions, such as changes in real estate tax rates, and the type,
location, size and stage of development of the Real Estate Trust's properties.
Debt service payments and most of the operating expenses associated with
income-producing properties are not decreased by reductions in occupancy or
rental income. Therefore, the ability of the Real Estate Trust to produce net
income in any year from its income-producing properties is highly dependent on
the Real Estate Trust's ability to maintain or increase the properties' levels
of gross income. The relative illiquidity of real estate investments tends to
limit the ability of the Real Estate Trust to vary its portfolio promptly in
response to changes in economic, demographic, social, financial and investment
conditions.
The bank's operating results historically have depended primarily on its "net
interest spread," which is the difference between the rates of interest earned
on its loans and securities investments and the rates of interest paid on its
deposits and borrowings. In the last three fiscal years, non-interest income
from securitizations of credit card and home equity credit line receivables and
income from gains on sales of credit card accounts, loans and mortgage-backed
securities have had a significant effect on net income. In addition to interest
paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, the bank's principal expenses are
operating expenses.
Fiscal 1998 Compared to Fiscal 1997
Real Estate
The Real Estate Trust recorded loss before depreciation and amortization of debt
expense of $6.9 million and an operating loss of $18.5 million for fiscal 1998,
compared to a loss before depreciation and amortization of debt expense of $7.8
million and an operating loss of $19.0 million for fiscal 1997. The improvement
was largely attributable to higher income after direct operating expenses for
hotels and office and industrial properties and higher other income, reduced by
increased corporate expenses, a reduction in equity in earnings of
unconsolidated entities, and a loss on the sale of a property in fiscal 1998 as
compared to a gain in fiscal 1997.
Income after direct operating expenses from hotel properties increased
$4,967,000, or 23.7%, in fiscal 1998 over the level achieved in fiscal 1997.
$2,208,000, or 11.0%, of this increase reflected improved results from nine
hotels owned throughout both fiscal years, and $2,759,000 reflected results from
acquisition properties. The increase in total revenue of $11,960,000, or 20.1%,
exceeded the increase of $6,993,000, or 18.2%, in direct operating expenses. For
the nine hotels owned throughout both fiscal years, the increase in total
revenue was $4,677,000, or 8.1%, and the increase in direct operating expenses
was $2,469,000, or 6.6%,. The revenue increase was attributable to improved
market conditions which permitted the Real Estate Trust to raise average room
rates at eight of the nine hotels. Average occupancy percentages declined
slightly from those of the previous year.
Income after direct operating expenses from office and industrial properties
increased $1,921,000, or 14.4%, in fiscal 1998 compared to such income in fiscal
1997. Gross income increased $1,786,000, or 8.5%, in fiscal 1998, while expenses
decreased $135,000, or 1.7%, due to refunds of property taxes. The improvement
in gross income was due to higher rents obtained upon releasing space.
Other income, which includes interest income, income from other real estate
properties and miscellaneous receipts, increased $277,000, or 6.9%, in fiscal
1998 due to higher interest income.
Land parcels and other expense decreased $76,000, or 4.5%, in fiscal 1998 as the
result of lower real estate taxes and the disposition of a property in the
current year.
Interest expense increased $2,290,000, or 5.7%, in fiscal 1998, primarily
because of the higher level of borrowings in the current period. The average
balance of outstanding borrowings increased to $433.2 million for fiscal 1998
from $400.3 million for the prior year. The increase in average borrowings
occurred as a result of a new issue of $200.0 million of Senior Secured Notes
due 2008 and the retirement of $175.0 million of Senior Secured Notes due 2002,
new mortgage loan financings and sales of new Unsecured Notes in excess of
maturing Notes. The average cost of borrowings was 10.05% in fiscal 1998 and
10.30% in fiscal 1997.
Amortization of debt expense decreased $292,000, or 44.0%, in fiscal 1998,
primarily due to lower costs experienced in the new Senior Secured Note
financing and in the renewal of lines of credit.
Depreciation increased $627,000, or 5.9%, in fiscal 1998 as a result of the
addition of two new income-producing properties as well as new tenant
improvements and capital replacements.
Advisory, management and leasing fees paid to related parties increased
$747,000, or 9.3%, in fiscal 1998. The advisory fee in fiscal 1998 was $317,000
per month compared to $311,000 per month for fiscal 1997, which resulted in an
aggregate increase of $75,000, or 2.0%,. Management and leasing fees were higher
by $672,000, or 15.8%, in fiscal 1998 as a result of increased gross income on
which fees are based.
General and administrative expense decreased $119,000, or 9.4%, in fiscal 1998
as a result of lower legal and insurance costs.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities represents the Real Estate Trust's
share of earnings in its partnership investments. For fiscal 1998, the Real
Estate Trust recorded earnings of $1,918,000 from such investments compared to
earnings of $4,150,000 in the prior year. The reduction of earnings in fiscal
1998 was due to the sales of interest rate protection agreements and the
write-off of unamortized costs in excess of sales proceeds received and the
write-off of unamortized loan costs when a portion of the loan portfolio was
refinanced.
Loss on sale of property in fiscal 1998 reflected the termination of the Real
Estate Trust's lease on a property located in Oxon Hill, Maryland. Gain on sale
of property in fiscal 1997 represents the gain on the sale of a
purchase-leaseback investment located in Casper, Wyoming and the gain on the
condemnation of a portion of a land parcel located in Atlanta, Georgia.
Banking
The bank's operating results historically have depended primarily on its net
interest spread, which is the difference between the rates of interest earned on
its loans and securities and the rates of interest paid on its deposits and
borrowings. In the last three fiscal years, servicing and securitization income
from credit card, home equity, automobile and home loan receivables have had a
significant effect on net income. In addition to interest paid on its
interest-bearing liabilities, the bank's principal expenses are operating
expenses.
On September 30, 1998, the bank sold its credit card portfolio and related
operations to First USA Bank, N.A. The credit card portfolio included
approximately $4.8 billion of managed credit card loans and 3.1 million Visa and
MasterCard credit card accounts. Although the credit card program has
historically been a significant source of earnings for the bank, management
believes that the bank will be able to maintain profitability by relying on its
core deposit franchise as a significant source of low-cost funds, and investing
those funds in assets that, although offering lower yields than credit cards,
involve less credit risk and overhead costs. Nevertheless, implementation of
this strategy will be a gradual process and the bank's short term profitability
may be adversely affected to the extent the immediate loss of earnings from the
credit card program can not be offset by corresponding reductions in operating
expenses.
Overview. The bank recorded operating income of $184.4 million for the year
ended September 30, 1998, compared to operating income of $80.2 million for the
year ended September 30, 1997. The increase in income for fiscal 1998 was
primarily attributable to a $230.8 million increase in other non-interest income
resulting primarily from a $288.3 million gain on sale of the bank's credit card
portfolio and related operations on September 30, 1998. Offsetting this amount
was an $85.7 million, or 20.5%, increase in operating non-interest expenses
caused primarily by increased salaries and employee benefits and loan expenses.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income, before the provision for loan losses,
decreased $15.2 million, or 7.1%, during fiscal 1998. The bank would have
recorded interest income of $2.3 million in fiscal 1998 if non-accrual assets
and restructured loans had been current in accordance with their original terms.
Interest income of $0.4 million was actually recorded on non-accrual assets and
restructured loans during the fiscal year. The bank's net interest income in
future periods will continue to be adversely affected by the bank's
non-performing assets. See "Financial Condition - Asset Quality - Non-Performing
Assets."
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information regarding
the total amount of income from interest-earning assets and the resulting
yields, the interest expense associated with interest-bearing liabilities,
expressed in dollars and rates, and the net interest spread and net yield on
interest-earning assets.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Net Interest Margin Analysis
(Dollars in thousands)
Year Ended September 30,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 30, 1998 1997 1996
----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------
1998 Average Yield/ Average Yield/ Average Yield/
Yield/Rate Balances Interest Rate Balances Interest Rate Balances Interest Rate
------------ ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net (1) 8.88 % $ 2,775,884 $299,701 10.80 % $ 3,578,600 $360,780 10.08 % $ 2,940,158 $317,902 10.81%
Mortgage-backed securities 5.92 1,990,123 113,441 5.70 1,204,839 72,209 5.99 834,198 50,955 6.11
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased
under agreements to resell 5.67 140,004 7,892 5.64 128,268 7,066 5.51 185,794 10,195 5.49
Trading securities 8.74 25,159 2,005 7.97 15,436 1,530 9.91 13,477 953 7.07
Investment securities 5.56 37,866 2,138 5.65 8,346 481 5.76 6,033 315 5.22
Other interest-earning assets 5.67 196,646 10,765 5.47 196,444 10,248 5.22 164,783 7,931 4.81
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------
Total 7.27 5,165,682 435,942 8.44 5,131,933 452,314 8.81 4,144,443 388,251 9.37
----------- --------- ------ -------- ------ -------- -----
Non-interest earning assets:
Cash 217,929 191,626 161,925
Real estate held for
investment or sale 86,348 115,948 161,092
Property and equipment, net 284,358 245,879 193,898
Cost in excess of net
assets acquired, net 55,496 38,630 42,648
Other assets 608,957 399,190 248,676
----------- ----------- -----------
Total assets $ 6,418,770 $ 6,123,206 $ 4,952,682
=========== =========== ===========
Liabilities and stockholders'
equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposit accounts:
Demand deposits 1.32 $ 998,256 19,877 1.99 $ 890,204 21,977 2.47 $ 846,796 23,137 2.73
Savings deposits 2.38 1,017,755 30,727 3.02 975,264 33,106 3.39 944,211 31,936 3.38
Time deposits 5.32 1,663,772 89,958 5.41 1,420,613 75,180 5.29 1,261,685 69,179 5.48
Money market deposits 3.62 994,590 38,756 3.90 992,066 38,644 3.90 990,392 38,317 3.87
----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- --------
Total deposits 3.40 4,674,373 179,318 3.84 4,278,147 168,907 3.95 4,043,084 162,569 4.02
Borrowings 6.43 888,473 59,092 6.65 1,134,754 70,908 6.25 369,831 26,267 7.10
----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- --------
Total liabilities 3.98 5,562,846 238,410 4.29 5,412,901 239,815 4.43 4,412,915 188,836 4.28
----------- --------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------
Non interest-bearing items:
Non-interest bearing
deposits 266,711 196,620 149,158
Other liabilities 79,655 53,037 51,338
Minority interest 144,000 119,376 --
Stockholders' equity 365,558 341,272 339,271
----------- ----------- ----------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity $ 6,418,770 $6,123,206 $4,952,682
=========== =========== ==========
Net interest income $197,532 $212,499 $199,415
========= ======== ========
Net interest spread (2) 4.15 % 4.38 % 5.09%
======= ======= ======
Net yield on interest-
earning assets (3) 3.82 % 4.14 % 4.81%
======= ======= ======
Interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing
liabilities 92.86 % 94.81 % 93.92%
======= ======= ======
(1) Includes loans held for sale and/or securitization. Interest on non-accruing
loans has been included only to the extent reflected in the consolidated
statements of operations; however, the loan balance is included in the average
amount outstanding until transferred to real estate acquired in settlement of
loans. Includes ($3,078), ($8,329), and ($7,980) of amortized loan fees,
premiums and discounts in interest income for the years ended September 30,
1998, 1997 and 1996.
(2) Equals weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets less weighted
average rate on total interest-bearing liabilities.
(3) Equals net interest income divided by the average balances of total
interest-earning assets.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The following table presents certain information regarding changes in interest
income and interest expense of the bank during the periods indicated. For each
category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
information is provided on changes attributable to changes in volume, based on
change in volume multiplied by old rate; changes in rate, based on change in
rate multiplied by old volume; and changes in rate and volume.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Volume and Rate Changes in Net Interest Income
(In thousands)
Year Ended September 30, 1998 Year Ended September 30, 1997
Compared to Compared to
Year Ended September 30, 1997 Year Ended September 30, 1996
Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in (1) Due to Change in (1)
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Total Total
Volume Rate Change Volume Rate Change
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Loans (2) $(85,412) $ 24,333 $ (61,079) $ 65,450 $(22,572) $ 42,878
Mortgage-backed securities 44,886 (3,654) 41,232 22,272 (1,018) 21,254
Federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to resell 657 169 826 (3,166) 37 (3,129)
Trading securities 819 (344) 475 153 424 577
Investment securities 1,666 (9) 1,657 131 35 166
Other interest-earning assets 11 506 517 1,605 712 2,317
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------
Total interest income (37,373 ) 21,001 (16,372) 86,445 (22,382) 64,063
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------
Interest expense:
Deposit accounts 15,240 (4,829) 10,411 9,233 (2,895) 6,338
Borrowings (16,136) 4,320 (11,816) 48,142 (3,501) 44,641
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------
Total interest expense (896) (509) (1,405) 57,375 (6,396) 50,979
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------
Increase (decrease) in net interest income $(36,477) $ 21,510 $ (14,967) $ 29,070 $(15,986) $ 13,084
========= ========== ========== ========== ========= =========
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The net change attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate has
been allocated in proportion to the absolute value of the change due to volume
and the change due to rate.
(2) Includes loans held for sale and/or securitization.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Interest income in fiscal 1998 decreased $16.4 million, or 3.6%, from the level
in fiscal 1997 as a result of lower average balances of loans receivable, and,
to a lesser extent, lower average yields on mortgage-backed securities. Higher
average yields on loans receivable and higher average balances of
mortgage-backed securities partially offset the negative effect on interest
income of the lower average loan balances and lower average yields on
mortgage-backed securities.
The bank's net yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 3.82% in fiscal
1998 from 4.14% in fiscal 1997. The decrease in the net yield primarily
reflected lower yields resulting from a shift in the composition of
interest-earning assets from loans receivable to lower yielding mortgage-backed
securities, as well as higher average balances of deposits. The increase in
average deposits was primarily due to brokered time deposits accepted in fiscal
1997 which matured during fiscal 1998. Average demand deposits also increased
during fiscal 1998 as a result of the continued expansion of the bank's branch
network. The bank does not currently anticipate significant reliance on brokered
deposits as a key source of funding in the future.
Interest income on loans, the largest category of interest-earning assets,
decreased by $61.3 million, or 17.0%, from fiscal 1997 primarily because of
lower average balances. Higher average yields earned on the loan portfolio
partially offset the negative effect of the lower average balances.
Lower average balances of the bank's single-family residential loans, which
decreased $654.3 million, or 37.1%, resulted primarily from the $1.1 billion,
$560.2 million and $598.3 million exchange of single-family residential loans
held in its portfolio for mortgage-backed securities, which the bank retained
for its own portfolio, in September 1997, March 1998, and June 1998. The
decrease was primarily responsible for a $34.5 million, or 29.4%, decrease in
interest income from single-family residential loans. Average balances of home
improvement and related loans decreased $41.8 million, largely because of
securitization activity during fiscal 1998. Securitizations of credit card loans
and automobile loans were the primary reasons for the $122.3 million and $35.6
million decline, or 10.5% and 14.4%, in average balances of credit card loans
and automobile loans.
The average yield on the loan portfolio in fiscal 1998 increased 71 basis
points, to 10.79% from 10.08%, from the average yield in fiscal 1997.
Contributing to the higher net yield was an increase in the average yield on
automobile loans which was largely responsible for a $6.4 million increase in
interest income from such loans. In addition, an increase in the average yield
on single-family residential loans, from 6.65% to 7.47%, resulted from the
September 1997, March 1998, and June 1998 exchange of single-family residential
loans for mortgage-backed securities discussed above. Prior to the exchange,
these loans had a weighted average interest rate of 6.89%, 6.99%, and 6.84%.
Offsetting these amounts was a decrease in the average yield on credit card
loans, which, when coupled with the decreased average balance on such loans,
resulted in a $29.7 million decline in interest income from such loans for
fiscal 1998. During fiscal 1998, the bank continued to reprice its credit card
portfolio as a result of ongoing competitive pressures in the credit card
industry.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased $41.2 million, or 57.1%,
primarily because of higher average balances. The increased mortgage-backed
securities balances in the 1998 period reflected the $1.1 billion, $560.2
million and $598.3 million exchange of single-family residential loans for
mortgage-backed securities in September 1997, March 1998 and June 1998,. The
positive effect of the higher average balances was partially offset by a decline
in the average interest rates on these securities from 5.99% to 5.70%.
Interest expense decreased $1.4 million, or 0.6%, for fiscal 1998 primarily
because of a $179.8 million decline in the average balances of repurchase
agreement transactions and a $111.0 million decline in the average balances of
Federal Home Loan bank advances which resulted in an $11.8 million decrease in
interest expense on borrowings during fiscal 1998. Excess funds generated from
securitization activity during the year and additional deposits facilitated the
paydown of such borrowings.
The decrease in interest expense on borrowings was offset by an increase of
$10.4 million, or 6.2%, in interest expense on deposits, resulting from an
increase in average deposit balances of $396.2 million, or 9.3%, which was
partially offset by a decrease in the average rates on deposits, to 3.84% from
3.95%.
Provision for Loan Losses. The bank's provision for loan losses increased to
$150.8 million in fiscal 1998 from $125.1 million in fiscal 1997. The $25.7
million increase was primarily due to a $32.2 million increase in the provision
for losses on consumer and other loans. The increase in the provision for loan
losses was primarily due to adverse trends in delinquencies and losses in the
subprime segment of the automobile portfolio. See "Financial Condition - Asset
Quality - Allowances for Losses."
Other Income. Other non-interest income increased to $641.9 million in fiscal
1998 period from $411.1 million in fiscal 1997. The $230.8 million increase in
such income was primarily attributable to an increase in gain on sales of loans
which included the $288.3 million gain on the sale of the bank's credit card
portfolio and related operations on September 30, 1998. Also contributing to the
increase in other income was a $10.1 million increase in deposit servicing fees.
Partially offsetting these increases was a $71.9 million decrease in servicing
and securitization income.
Servicing and securitization income decreased $71.9 million to $233.3 million
from $305.2 million, primarily due to increases in the amortization of and
unrealized losses on interest-only strips. During fiscal 1998, and particularly
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, the prepayment and loss rates experienced
in the bank's various automobile, home-equity and home improvement loan
securitization transactions increased. At September 30, 1997, anticipated
prepayment rates ranged from 25% to 30% for automobile transactions, from 28% to
40% for home equity transactions and from 20% to 25% for home improvement loan
transactions. Actual prepayment rates during fiscal 1998 ranged from 40% to 45%
for automobile transactions, from 33% to 52% for home equity transactions and
from 30% to 35% for home improvement loan transactions. Similarly, at September
30, 1997, anticipated loss rates ranged from 1% to 6% for automobile
transactions and from 2% to 3% for home improvement loan transactions. Actual
loss rates during fiscal 1998 ranged from 2% to 13% for automobile transactions
and from 2% to 5% for home improvement loan transactions.
The effect of these increases in prepayment and loss rates on the carrying value
of the interest-only strips was two-fold. First, because actual prepayment and
loss experience during fiscal 1998 exceeded the estimates used when computing
the value of the interest-only strips at the end of fiscal 1997, increased
amortization of the interest-only strips was required. Second, when computing
the carrying value of the interest-only strips at the end of fiscal 1998, we
used the higher prepayment and loss rates experienced during fiscal 1998 because
we believed prepayments and losses would continue at those levels. The resulting
lower value for the interest-only strips at September 30, 1998 was reflected
through recognition of unrealized losses. The bank recognized net unrealized
losses on its automobile, home equity and home loan interest-only strips of
$42.9 million during fiscal 1998 compared to net unrealized gains on the
valuation of the bank's credit card interest-only strips of $7.0 million during
1997. In addition, amortization of $99.0 million on interest-only strips related
to prior gains on sales of loans was recorded in fiscal 1998 compared to $24.8
million in fiscal 1997. Offsetting these amounts were gains of $81.6 million,
$23.1 million, $19.7 million and $3.4 million recognized on the securitization
and sale of credit card loans, automobile loans, home equity and home loan
receivables.
The $2.1 million, or 11.5%, decrease in loss on real estate held for investment
or sale was primarily attributable to an increase of $1.5 million in the gain
recorded on sales of the bank's real estate held for sale coupled with a $0.8
million decrease in the provision for losses on such assets. See "Financial
Condition Asset Quality - Allowances for Losses."
Deposit servicing fees increased $10.1 million, or 24.1%, during fiscal 1998
primarily due to an increase in fees generated through the bank's ATM network in
addition to increases in other deposit servicing fees resulting from the
expansion of the bank's branch network.
Credit card fees, consisting of annual fees, late charges, cash advance charges,
interchange income, net of rebate expenses, and overlimit fees decreased to
$53.9 million in fiscal 1998 from $57.4 million in fiscal 1997. The $3.5
million, or 6.1%, decrease was primarily attributable to an $8.8 million
increase in rebate expenses, the effects of which were due principally to the
introduction of additional programs and products designed to encourage greater
usage of the bank's credit cards. Partially offsetting the increase in rebate
expenses were increases in certain fees resulting from changes to the fee
structure for the bank's credit card programs which were implemented in fiscal
1997.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for fiscal 1998 increased $85.7 million,
or 20.5%, from the level in fiscal 1997. The primary component of the higher
operating expenses was a $38.6 million increase in salaries and employee
benefits resulting primarily from the addition of staff to the bank's consumer
lending and branch operations. The $24.2 million increase in loan expenses was
primarily attributable to increased credit card collection and retention costs
and to increases in the valuation allowances on servicing assets. The increase
in the valuation allowance on servicing assets was a result of an increase in
estimated future prepayment rates. Also contributing to the increase in
operating expenses was an increase of $5.1 million in marketing expenses,
primarily credit card marketing expenses.
Fiscal 1997 Compared to Fiscal 1996
Real Estate
The Real Estate Trust recorded a loss before depreciation and amortization of
debt expense of $7.8 million and an operating loss of $19.0 million for fiscal
1997, compared to a loss before depreciation and amortization of debt expense of
$13.5 million and an operating loss of $24.2 million for fiscal 1996. The
improvement was largely attributable to higher income after direct operating
expenses for hotels and office and industrial properties, increased income from
Saul Holdings Partnership and other partnership investments, and recognition of
gains on sales of properties.
Income after direct operating expenses from hotel properties increased
$2,771,000, or 15.3%, in fiscal 1997 over the level achieved in fiscal 1996. In
fiscal 1997, room sales increased $4,542,000, or 11.7%, while food and beverage
sales increased $565,000, or 4.6%. The increase in total revenue of $5,219,000,
or 9.6%, exceeded the increase of $2,448,000, or 6.8%, in direct operating
expenses. The revenue increases were due to improved market conditions, which
permitted management to raise average room rates while maintaining or increasing
occupancy at several of the hotels. The Real Estate Trust also acquired a new
hotel in fiscal 1997.
Income after direct operating expenses from commercial properties, which
consists of office and industrial properties, increased $2,992,000, or 28.9%, in
fiscal 1997 compared to such income in fiscal 1996. Gross income increased
$3,507,000, or 19.9%, in fiscal 1997, while expenses increased $515,000, or
7.1%. The improvement was the direct result of a higher leasing rate in fiscal
1997. Expenses in fiscal 1997 were above the prior year's principally due to
higher property taxes and higher operating expenses.
Other income, which includes interest income, income from other real estate
properties and miscellaneous receipts, declined by $996,000, or 19.9%, in fiscal
1997 primarily due to lower cash balances on which interest was earned. Other
income in fiscal 1996 also included $695,000 received as refunds of transfer
taxes paid in a preceding year.
Land parcels and other expense increased $46,000, or 2.8%, in fiscal 1997 as the
result of higher real estate taxes.
Interest expense increased $315,000, or 0.8%, in fiscal 1997, primarily because
of the higher level of borrowings in the current period. The average balance of
outstanding borrowings increased to $400.3 million for fiscal 1997 from $395.6
million for the prior year. The change in average borrowings occurred as a
result of mortgage loan refinancings and unsecured note sales. The average cost
of borrowings was 10.30% in fiscal 1997 and 10.31% in fiscal 1996.
Depreciation increased $523,000, or 5.2%, in fiscal 1997 as a result of new
tenant improvements, capital replacements, and the addition of a new
income-producing property.
Advisory, management and leasing fees paid to related parties increased
$572,000, or 7.7%, in fiscal 1997. The advisory fee in fiscal 1997 was $311,000
per month, compared to $301,000 per month for the first six months of fiscal
1996 and $306,000 per month for the second six months of fiscal 1996, which
resulted in an aggregate increase of $93,000, or 2.6%. Management and leasing
fees were higher by $479,000, or 12.7%, in fiscal 1997 as a result of increased
gross income on which fees are based. General and administrative expense
decreased $129,000, or 9.2%, in fiscal 1997, as a result of lower administrative
costs.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities represents the Real Estate Trust's
share of earnings in its partnership investments. For fiscal 1997, the Real
Estate Trust recorded earnings of $4,150,000 from such investments compared to
earnings of $3,374,000 in the prior year.
Gain on sale of property in fiscal 1997 represents the gain on the sale of a
purchase-leaseback investment located in Casper, Wyoming and the gain on the
condemnation of a portion of a land parcel located in Atlanta, Georgia.
Banking
Overview. The bank recorded operating income of $80.2 million for the year ended
September 30, 1997 compared to operating income of $46.1 million for the year
ended September 30, 1996. The increase in income for fiscal 1997 was primarily
attributable to a $67.3 million increase in other non-interest income and a
$13.2 million increase in net interest income before provision for loan losses,
the effect of which was partially offset by a $9.4 million increase in the
provision for loan losses and a $37.0 million increase in operating non-interest
expense reflecting in part additional expenses associated with steps taken by
management to improve credit quality and expand the bank's core businesses,
including the consumer loan program and deposit franchise.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income, before the provision for loan losses,
increased $13.2 million, or 6.6%, in fiscal 1997. The bank would have recorded
interest income of $6.9 million in fiscal 1997 if the bank's nonaccrual assets
and restructured loans had been current in accordance with their original terms.
Interest income of $0.7 million was actually recorded on non-accrual assets and
restructured loans during the fiscal year. The bank's net interest income in
future periods will continue to be adversely affected by the bank's
non-performing assets. See "Financial Condition Asset Quality - Non-Performing
Assets."
Interest income in fiscal 1997 increased $64.2 million from the level in fiscal
1996, primarily as a result of higher average balances of loans receivable and,
to a lesser extent, mortgage-backed securities. The effect on interest income of
higher average balances was offset in part by lower average yields earned by the
bank on its loan portfolio.
The bank's net yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 4.14% in fiscal
1997 from 4.81% in fiscal 1996. The decrease in the net yield primarily
reflected lower yields earned on certain of the bank's interest-earning assets
resulting from a decline in market rates as well as lower introductory and
promotional rates on certain products which the bank has offered to new and
existing customers in an effort to stimulate usage.
Interest income on loans, the largest category of interest-earning assets,
increased by $43.0 million, or 13.5%, from fiscal 1996 primarily because of
higher average balances, which were partially offset by lower average yields on
the loan portfolio.
Higher average balances on credit card loans, which increased $159.5 million, or
15.8%,. The increase was primarily responsible for a $3.4 million, or 2.2%,
increase in interest income from credit card loans. Higher average balances of
automobile loans, which increased $64.2 million, or 35.1%, resulted primarily
from the higher origination volume of such loans, and was largely responsible
for a $16.2 million, or 75.3% increase in interest income on automobile loans.
Interest income on the bank's single-family residential loans increased by $15.8
million, or 15.6%, primarily because of increased originations, which resulted
in an increase of $355.8 million, or 25.2%, in the average balances of such
loans. Average balances of home equity credit line loans increased by $60.0
million, or 74.8%, primarily because of the $119.2 million purchase of such
loans in December 1996. Interest income on home equity credit line loans
increased by $5.7 million, or 124.4%, in the current year.
The average yield on the loan portfolio in fiscal 1997 decreased by 73 basis
points, to 10.08% from 10.81%, from the average yield in fiscal 1996. The lower
net yield was primarily due to a 182 basis point decrease in the average net
yield on credit card loans from 15.50% to 13.68%, the effect of which partially
offset the positive effect that the higher average balances had on income. The
decline in the net yield was primarily a result of marketing strategies to
introduce lower introductory rates to new customers, as well as a new program
offering reduced interest rates to previously risk-repriced accounts in an
attempt to encourage payments from delinquent customers. Also contributing to
the decreased average yield on the loan portfolio was a decrease in the average
yield on single-family residential loans from 7.21% to 6.65%. An increase in the
average yield on automobile loans from 11.75% to 15.24%, primarily due to higher
yields earned on loans originated by one of the bank's operating subsidiaries,
partially offset the negative effect of the lower average yields discussed
above.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased $21.3 million, or 41.7%,
primarily because of higher average balances. The increased mortgage-backed
securities balances in fiscal 1997 reflected the purchase of $649.7 million of
mortgage-backed securities near the end of fiscal 1996 and the $1.1 billion
securitization of single-family residential loans in September 1997. The
positive effect of the higher average balances was partially offset by a
decrease in the average interest rates on these securities from 6.11% to 5.99%.
Interest expense increased $51.0 million, or 27.0%, for fiscal 1997 primarily
because of an increase of $764.9 million, or 206.8%, in the average balances of
the bank's borrowings. The increase in the average balances of borrowings
resulted in an increase of $44.6 million in interest expense for fiscal 1997 for
such liabilities. The increase in interest expense on borrowings is primarily
due to a $22.8 million, a $13.7 million and a $6.9 million increase in interest
expense on securities sold under repurchase agreements, Federal Home Loan bank
advances and subordinated debentures resulting primarily from higher average
balances of such borrowings. The negative effect of the higher average balances
was partially offset by a decrease in the average borrowing rate, to 6.25% from
7.10%, which reflected an increase in lower-yielding FHLB advances and
securities sold under repurchase agreements.
An increase of $6.3 million in interest expense on deposits, the largest
category of interest-bearing liabilities, also contributed to the increased
interest expense. Interest expense on deposits increased primarily because of a
$235.1 million increase in the average balances.
Provision for Loan Losses. The bank's provision for loan losses increased to
$125.1 million in fiscal 1997 from $115.7 million in fiscal 1996. The $9.4
million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to a $7.8
million increase in the provision for losses on credit card loans. See
"Financial Condition - Asset Quality - Allowances for Losses."
Other Income. The $67.3 million, or 19.6%, increase in other non-interest income
to $411.1 million in fiscal 1997 from $343.8 million in fiscal 1996 was
primarily attributable to increases in servicing and securitization income,
credit card fees, deposit servicing fees and a decrease in loss on real estate
held for investment or sale.
Servicing and securitization income increased $20.2 million to $305.2 million
from $285.0 million, primarily due to gains recognized on the securitization and
sale of credit card loans, automobile loans, home equity and home loan
receivables of $26.2 million, $26.9 million, $11.8 million and $7.4 million.
Management expects that the relative impact of gains recognized under SFAS 125
on the bank's earnings will diminish as the gains associated with these and
other transactions are amortized. In addition, in accordance with SFAS 125, the
bank recognized a $7.0 million net unrealized gain on the valuation of its
interest-only strips. This gain represents the September 30, 1997 market-value
adjustment on the interest-only strips related to the credit card securitized
assets. Offsetting these amounts was a decrease of $36.3 million, or 13.8%, in
loan servicing fees which was primarily due to a decrease of $49.0 million in
excess spread income earned by the bank for servicing its portfolios of
securitized credit card loans. The decrease in such excess spread income for
fiscal 1997 resulted primarily from an increase in charge-offs on securitized
credit card loans which is consistent with management's expectations and
generally reflects the trends that are affecting the credit card industry as a
whole. See "Financial Condition - Asset Quality Allowances for Losses."
Credit card fees, consisting of membership fees, late charges, over-the-limit
fees, interchange fees and cash advance charges, increased $26.6 million, or
86.5%, in fiscal 1997 from the level in fiscal 1996. The increase was primarily
attributable to the impact of changes in the fee structure for the bank's credit
card programs which were implemented in fiscal 1996 and 1997.
The $12.0 million, or 40.1%, increase in deposit servicing fees resulted
primarily from the additional fees generated through the bank's ATM network,
and, to a lesser extent, an increase in the number of deposit accounts
outstanding during fiscal 1997.
The $5.7 million, or 23.5%, decrease in loss on real estate held for investment
or sale was primarily attributable to a decrease of $6.7 million in the
provision for losses on such assets, which was partially offset by a decrease of
$1.1 million in the gain recorded on sales of the bank's real estate held for
investment or sale.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for fiscal 1997 increased $37.0 million,
or 9.7%, from the level in fiscal 1996. The main components of the higher
operating expenses were increases in salaries and employee benefits, marketing
and data processing. The $33.6 million increase in salaries and employee
benefits resulted primarily from the addition of staff to the bank's credit
card, consumer lending, branch and systems operations. The $20.8 million
increase in marketing expenses was primarily attributable to a $14.4 million
increase in marketing expenses associated with the credit card program as the
bank continues to focus on increased originations of such loans, as well as a
$5.3 million increase in marketing expenses associated with the bank's deposit
base. The $6.9 million increase in data processing expenses was principally
attributable to an increase in the number of credit card accounts outstanding
and the activity generated by such accounts during fiscal 1997. The $32.3
million decrease in deposit insurance premiums, which partially offset the
expense increases discussed above, was primarily because of the one-time SAIF
assessment recorded by the bank in fiscal 1996. See "Business - Regulation -
Deposit Insurance Premiums."
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Information required by this Item is included in Item 7 "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements of the Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries are
included in this report on the pages indicated and are incorporated herein by
reference:
(a) Report of Independent Public Accountants.
(b) Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of September 30,
1998 and 1997.
(c) Consolidated Statements of Operations - For the
years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
(d) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Deficit - For the
years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
(e) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - For the
years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
(f) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The selected quarterly financial data included in Note 34 of Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements referred to above are incorporated herein by
reference.
Summary financial information with respect to the Bank is also included in Part
I, Item 1.
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Trustees and Shareholders of
B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of B.F. Saul Real
Estate Investment Trust (the "Trust") and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998
and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of B.F. Saul Real Estate
Investment Trust and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended September 30, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Arthur Andersen LLP
Washington, D.C.
December 2, 1998
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Balance Sheets
B. F. SAUL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
===============================================================================================================================
September 30
-----------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Real Estate
Income-producing properties
Hotel $ 165,805 $ 128,557
Office and industrial 110,257 109,628
Other 3,889 4,265
----------------- -----------------
279,951 242,450
Accumulated depreciation (96,072) (85,915)
----------------- -----------------
183,879 156,535
Land parcels 40,110 42,160
Construction in progress 8,694 2,480
Cash and cash equivalents 13,950 18,248
Other assets 76,799 81,150
----------------- -----------------
Total real estate assets 323,432 300,573
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banking
Cash and due from banks 336,858 238,169
Interest-bearing deposits 499,598 48,722
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell 380,000 365,000
Loans held for sale 56,287 102,749
Loans held for securitization and sale 125,000 220,000
Investment securities (market value $44,528 and $5,012, respectively) 43,999 4,998
Trading securities 11,319 7,899
Mortgage-backed securities (market value $2,014,819 and $1,984,667, respectively) 2,025,817 1,985,707
Loans receivable (net of allowance for losses of $60,157 and $105,679, respectively) 2,533,957 2,122,899
Federal Home Loan Bank stock 49,036 33,170
Real estate held for investment or sale (net of allowance for losses of $153,766 and
$140,936, respectively) 69,025 94,290
Property and equipment, net 285,916 273,562
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net 30,879 8,846
Interest only strips, net 13,508 87,011
Servicing assets, net 27,156 41,721
Other assets 232,794 422,670
----------------- -----------------
Total banking assets 6,721,149 6,057,413
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 7,044,581 $ 6,357,986
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES
Real Estate
Mortgage notes payable $ 198,874 $ 180,204
Notes payable - secured 200,000 175,000
Notes payable - unsecured 50,335 46,633
Deferred gains - real estate 112,883 112,883
Accrued dividends payable - preferred shares of beneficial interest 34,049 36,231
Other liabilities and accrued expenses 39,895 39,959
----------------- -----------------
Total real estate liabilities 636,036 590,910
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banking
Deposit accounts 4,888,230 4,893,756
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings 491,754 74,821
Notes payable 430 7,019
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 352,027 188,511
Custodial accounts 5,926 2,809
Amounts due to banks 40,601 44,835
Other liabilities 112,668 120,416
Capital notes -- subordinated 250,000 250,000
----------------- -----------------
Total banking liabilities 6,141,636 5,582,167
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commitments and contingencies
Minority interest held by affiliates 72,242 51,388
Minority interest -- other 218,306 218,306
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 7,068,220 6,442,771
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred shares of beneficial interest, $10.50 cumulative, $1 par value, 90 million shares
authorized, 516,000 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation value $51.6 million 516 516
Common shares of beneficial interest, $1 par value, 10 million shares authorized,
6,641,598 shares issued 6,642 6,642
Paid-in surplus 92,943 92,943
Deficit (81,936) (142,642)
Net unrealized holding loss 44 (396)
----------------- -----------------
18,209 (42,937)
Less cost of 1,814,688 common shares of beneficial interest in treasury (41,848) (41,848)
----------------- -----------------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT (23,639) (84,785)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT $ 7,044,581 $ 6,357,986
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Statements of Operations
B. F. SAUL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
===================================================================================================================================
For the Year Ended September 30
------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts) 1998 1997 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REAL ESTATE
Income
Hotels $ 71,424 $ 59,464 $ 54,245
Office and industrial properties 22,883 21,097 17,590
Other 4,285 4,008 5,004
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Total income 98,592 84,569 76,839
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expenses
Direct operating expenses:
Hotels 45,516 38,523 36,075
Office and industrial properties 7,631 7,766 7,251
Land parcels and other 1,607 1,683 1,637
Interest expense 42,445 40,155 39,840
Amortization of debt expense 372 664 674
Depreciation 11,170 10,543 10,020
Advisory, management and leasing fees - related parties 8,742 7,995 7,423
General and administrative 1,153 1,272 1,401
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Total expenses 118,636 108,601 104,321
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities 1,918 4,150 3,374
Gain (loss) on sale of property (331) 895 (68)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REAL ESTATE OPERATING LOSS $ (18,457) $ (18,987) $ (24,176)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BANKING
Interest income
Loans $ 299,566 $ 360,842 $ 317,847
Mortgage-backed securities 113,441 72,209 50,955
Trading securities 2,005 1,530 953
Investment securities 2,138 481 315
Other 18,657 17,314 18,126
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Total interest income 435,807 452,376 388,196
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense
Deposit accounts 179,318 168,907 162,569
Short-term borrowings 33,294 47,378 10,407
Long-term borrowings 25,798 23,530 15,860
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Total interest expense 238,410 239,815 188,836
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Net interest income 197,397 212,561 199,360
Provision for loan losses (150,829) (125,115) (115,740)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 46,568 87,446 83,620
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other income
Servicing and securitization income 233,271 305,192 284,964
Credit card fees 53,881 57,381 30,765
Deposit servicing fees 51,997 41,893 29,900
Gain on sales of trading securities, net 982 1,203 1,158
Net unrealized holding loss on trading securities (1,258) -- --
Loss on real estate held for investment or sale, net (16,539) (18,688) (24,413)
Gain on sales of loans, net 290,434 1,527 1,732
Other 29,089 22,573 19,713
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Total other income 641,857 411,081 343,819
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continued on following page.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Continued)
B. F. SAUL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
===================================================================================================================================
For the Year Ended September 30
------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts) 1998 1997 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BANKING (Continued)
Operating expenses
Salaries and employee benefits $ 199,557 $ 160,949 $ 127,370
Loan 54,147 29,943 28,284
Property and equipment 28,114 24,397 20,705
Marketing 79,642 74,504 53,705
Data processing 45,419 48,138 41,270
Depreciation and amortization 33,989 28,708 24,635
Deposit insurance premiums 4,859 5,033 37,362
Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets 5,862 2,615 1,775
Other 52,429 44,059 46,222
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Total operating expenses 504,018 418,346 381,328
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BANKING OPERATING INCOME $ 184,407 $ 80,181 $ 46,111
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COMPANY
Operating income $ 165,950 $ 61,194 $ 21,935
Income tax provision 42,869 12,810 8,301
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Income before extraordinary item and minority interest 123,081 48,384 13,634
Extraordinary item:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of taxes (9,601) -- --
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Income before minority interest 113,480 48,384 13,634
Minority interest held by affiliates (22,043) (6,848) (3,962)
Minority interest -- other (25,313) (22,676) (9,750)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COMPANY NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 66,124 $ 18,860 $ (78)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS $ 60,706 $ 13,442 $ (5,498)
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Income before extraordinary item and minority interest $ 24.38 $ 8.90 $ 1.70
Extraordinary item:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of taxes (1.99) -- --
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Income before minority interest 22.39 8.90 1.70
Minority interest held by affiliates (4.57) (1.42) (0.82)
Minority interest -- other (5.24) (4.70) (2.02)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE $ 12.58 $ 2.78 $ (1.14)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Deficit
B. F. SAUL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
====================================================================================================================================
For the Year Ended September 30
---------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 1998 1997 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PREFERRED SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST
Beginning and end of year (516,000 shares) $ 516 $ 516 $ 516
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
COMMON SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST
Beginning and end of year (6,641,598 shares) 6,642 6,642 6,642
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
PAID-IN SURPLUS
Beginning and end of year 92,943 92,943 92,943
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
DEFICIT
Beginning of year (142,642) (156,084) (123,943)
Net income (loss) 66,124 18,860 (78)
Dividends:
Real Estate Trust preferred shares of beneficial interest:
Distributions ($0.97 per share in 1996) -- -- (500)
Distributions payable ($10.50, $10.50 and $61.17 per share in 1998, 1997
and 1996, respectively) (5,418) (5,418) (31,563)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
End of year (81,936) (142,642) (156,084)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Net unrealized holding gain (losses) 44 (396) (1,500)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
TREASURY SHARES
Beginning and end of year (1,814,688 shares) (41,848) (41,848) (41,848)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT $ (23,639) $ (84,785) $ (99,331)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
B. F. SAUL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
====================================================================================================================================
For the Year Ended September 30
--------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Real Estate
Net loss $ (22,048) $ (8,531) $ (15,924)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation 11,170 10,543 10,020
(Gain) loss on sale of property 328 (895) 68
Early extinguishment of debt 9,601 -- --
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable and accrued income (1,229) 17 (4,869)
(Increase) decrease in deferred tax asset 954 (3,252) 1,881
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 2,708 1,058 430
(Increase) decrease in tax sharing receivable (6,545) 2,492 14,533
Amortization of debt expense 372 664 674
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities (2,161) (4,150) (3,374)
Other 21,588 8,965 5,593
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
14,738 6,911 9,032
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Banking
Net income 88,172 27,391 15,846
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Amortization (accretion) of premiums, discounts and net deferred loan fees 8,727 7,130 (163)
Depreciation and amortization 33,989 28,708 24,635
Provision for loan losses 150,829 125,115 115,740
Capitalized interest on real estate under development (1,954) (2,212) (3,462)
Proceeds from sales of trading securities 320,942 430,938 363,364
Net fundings of loans held for sale and/or securitization (366,915) (697,593) (690,589)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale and/or securitization 2,005,143 2,511,163 1,961,242
Proceeds from sales of spread accounts 36,000 144,200 42,140
Gain on sale of credit card relationships (288,332) -- --
Gain on sales of real estate held for sale (2,609) (1,156) (2,278)
Provision for losses on real estate held for investment or sale 18,860 19,623 26,341
Gain on sales of trading securities, net (982) (1,203) (1,158)
(Increase) decrease in interest-only strips 73,503 (87,011) --
(Increase) decrease in excess spread assets -- 42,602 (8,580)
(Increase) decrease in servicing assets 14,550 (8,948) (4,238)
Increase in goodwill and other intangible assets (22,017) (6,430) 1,795
(Increase) decrease in other assets 147,079 (207,883) (103,211)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities (11,982) 21,741 23,724
Increase (decrease) in tax sharing payable 6,545 (2,492) (14,533)
Minority interest held by affiliates 22,043 6,848 3,962
Minority interest - other 9,750 9,750 9,750
Other (29,752) 8,006 (12,440)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
2,211,589 2,368,287 1,747,887
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 2,226,327 2,375,198 1,756,919
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Real Estate
Capital expenditures - properties (19,815) (10,120) (7,408)
Property acquisitions (26,650) (4,709) --
Property sales -- 1,399 1,812
Equity investment in unconsolidated entities 1,348 1,723 639
Other 2 43 50
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(45,115) (11,664) (4,907)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Banking
Net proceeds from maturities of investment securities 5,000 5,000 4,410
Net proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock 2,504 9,482 --
Net proceeds from sales of real estate 25,305 23,624 58,874
Proceeds from the sale of credit card receivables 1,337,678 -- --
Net fundings of loans receivable (2,983,595) (1,779,711) (1,711,308)
Principal collected on mortgage-backed securities 1,180,995 771,095 221,698
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock (18,370) (10,712) --
Purchases of investment securities (44,001) -- (9,725)
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities -- (311,554) (649,688)
Purchases of loans receivable (1,645,458) (892,367) (391,878)
Purchases of property and equipment (58,106) (77,859) (69,749)
Disbursements for real estate held for investment or sale (14,814) (14,199) (14,447)
Other 10,637 1,036 (5,950)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(2,202,225) (2,276,165) (2,567,763)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Net cash used in investing activities (2,247,340) (2,287,829) (2,572,670)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continued on following page.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
B. F. SAUL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
===================================================================================================================================
For the Year Ended September 30
--------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Real Estate
Proceeds from mortgage financing $ 60,929 $ 27,072 $ --
Principal curtailments and repayments of mortgages (38,602) (19,977) (8,573)
Proceeds from secured note financing 224,075 -- 2,500
Repayments of secured notes (199,075) (2,500) (500)
Proceeds from sales of unsecured notes 5,802 5,822 3,708
Repayments of unsecured notes (2,100) (1,556) (2,398)
Costs of obtaining financings (7,295) (626) (201)
Loan prepayment fees (10,055) -- --
Dividends paid - preferred shares of beneficial interest (7,600) (750) (500)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
26,079 7,485 (5,964)
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Banking
Proceeds from customer deposits and sales of certificates of deposit 24,799,407 18,915,801 15,312,125
Customer withdrawals of deposits and payments for maturing certificates of deposit (24,804,933) (18,186,082) (15,307,340)
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under repurchase agreements 384,699 (574,217) 574,400
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank 1,759,817 877,483 429,459
Repayments of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (1,596,301) (958,037) (315,446)
Proceeds from other borrowings 16,559,882 6,271,193 2,469,675
Repayments of other borrowings (16,534,237) (6,259,554) (2,417,606)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock (9,750) (9,750) (9,750)
Cash dividends paid on common stock (6,500) (9,000) (8,500)
Repayment of capital notes - subordinated -- (10,000) --
Net proceeds received from capital notes - subordinated -- 96,112 --
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock -- 144,000 --
Other 3,117 (4,605) 2
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
555,201 293,344 727,019
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 581,280 300,829 721,055
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 560,267 388,198 (94,696)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 670,139 281,941 376,637
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 1,230,406 $ 670,139 $ 281,941
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year
for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized) $ 276,817 $ 267,758 $ 237,568
Income taxes paid (refunded) 7,454 (2,552) 4,356
Shares of Saul Centers, Inc. common stock 4,806 6,111 4,864
Cash received during the year from:
Dividends on shares of Saul Centers, Inc. common stock 3,014 2,539 1,952
Distributions from Saul Holdings Limited Partnership 5,567 5,453 5,453
Supplemental disclosures of noncash activities:
Rollovers of notes payable - unsecured 5,510 4,195 3,725
Loans held for sale exchanged for trading securities 320,695 430,786 363,257
Loans receivable transferred to loans held for sale and/or securitization 1,788,831 2,026,478 1,594,262
Loans made in connection with the sale of real estate 7,274 7,769 46,537
Loans receivable transferred to real estate acquired in settlement of loans 4,938 4,706 5,972
Loans receivable exchanged for mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity 1,225,279 1,136,180 --
Loans held for sale transferred to loans receivable -- -- 3,146
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
GENERAL
B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust and its wholly owned subsidiaries
(collectively, the "Real Estate Trust") operate as a Maryland real estate
investment trust. The principal business activity of the Real Estate Trust is
the ownership and development of income-producing properties. The properties
owned by the Real Estate Trust are located predominantly in the Mid-Atlantic and
Southeastern regions of the United States and consist principally of hotels,
office projects, and various undeveloped land parcels.
B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust also owns 80% of the outstanding common
stock of Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B. and its subsidiaries (collectively the "Bank"
or the "Corporations"), whose assets accounted for approximately 95% of the
consolidated assets of the B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust and its
consolidated subsidiaries (the "Trust") at September 30, 1998. The Bank is a
federally chartered and federally insured stock savings bank. The B. F. Saul
Real Estate Investment Trust is a thrift holding company by virtue of its
ownership of a majority interest in the Bank and is subject to regulation by the
Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS"). The accounting and reporting practices of
the Trust conform to generally accepted accounting principles and, as
appropriate, predominant practices within the real estate and banking
industries.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Real Estate
Trust and its subsidiaries. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements
reflect the assets, liabilities, operating results, and cash flows for two
business segments: Real Estate and Banking. Entities in which the Trust holds a
non-controlling interest (generally 50% or less) are accounted for on the equity
method. See Note 2.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. In preparing the financial statements,
management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
ACCOUNTING FOR THE IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the
expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the
carrying amount of the asset, the Trust recognizes an impairment loss.
Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and identifiable
intangibles that the Trust expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of
the asset. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be disposed
of are generally reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less the
cost to sell.
<PAGE>
INCOME TAXES
The Trust files a consolidated federal income tax return which includes
operations of all 80% or more owned subsidiaries. It voluntarily terminated its
qualification as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code
during fiscal 1978.
The Trust uses an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes.
Deferred income taxes are recorded using currently enacted tax laws and rates.
To the extent that realization of deferred tax assets is more likely than not,
such assets are recognized.
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (loss) per common share is determined by dividing net income (loss),
after deducting preferred share dividend requirements, by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the year. For fiscal years 1998, 1997
and 1996, the weighted average number of shares used in the calculation was
4,826,910.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial
statements for the years ended September 30, 1997 and 1996 to conform with the
presentation used for the year ended September 30, 1998.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET ADOPTED
SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" ("SFAS 130") was issued in June
1997 and establishes accounting standards for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-purpose
financial statements. SFAS 130 requires that all items that are required to be
recognized under accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be
reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as
other financial statements. SFAS 130 also requires an enterprise to classify
items of other comprehensive income by their nature in a financial statement and
to display the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from
retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of a
statement of financial position. SFAS 130 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1997. The adoption of SFAS 130 will not have an
impact on the Trust's financial condition or its results of operations.
SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information" ("SFAS 131"), was also issued in June 1997. SFAS 131 establishes
accounting standards for the way business enterprises report information about
operating segments in annual and interim financial reports issued to
shareholders. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about
products and services, geographic areas and major customers. SFAS 131 requires
that a business enterprise report financial and descriptive information,
including profit or loss, certain specific revenue and expense items, and
segment assets, about its reportable operating segments. Operating segments are
defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by management in deciding
how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. SFAS 131 is effective
for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 1997. Because
SFAS 131 addresses only disclosure related issues, its adoption will not have an
impact on the Trust's financial condition or its results of operations.
<PAGE>
AICPA Statement of Position 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-up
Activities" ("SOP 98-5"), was issued during fiscal 1998. SOP 98-5 generally
requires that start-up costs be expensed as incurred. However, certain start-up
costs, including the costs of acquiring or constructing long-lived assets and
getting them ready for their intended use, are not covered by SOP 98-5. SOP 98-5
is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 1998. The impact of the adoption of SOP 98-5 on the Trust's financial
condition and its results of operations has not been determined.
B. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - REAL ESTATE TRUST
CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Real Estate Trust considers all highly liquid, temporary investments with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
PROPERTIES
Income-producing properties are stated at the lower of depreciated cost (except
those which were acquired through foreclosure or equivalent proceedings, the
carrying amounts of which are based on the lower of cost or fair value at the
time of acquisition) or net realizable value.
Interest, real estate taxes and other carrying costs are capitalized on projects
under construction. Once construction is completed and the assets are placed in
service, rental income, direct operating expenses, and depreciation associated
with such properties are included in current operations. The Real Estate Trust
considers a project to be substantially complete and held available for
occupancy upon completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year
from the cessation of major construction activity. Substantially completed
portions of a project are accounted for as separate projects.
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred.
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method and estimated useful
lives of 31.5 to 47 years for buildings and up to 20 years for certain other
improvements. Tenant improvements are amortized over the lesser of their
estimated useful lives or the lives of the related leases using the
straight-line method.
INCOME RECOGNITION
The Real Estate Trust derives room and other revenues from the operations of its
hotel properties. The Real Estate Trust derives rental income under
noncancelable long-term leases from tenants at its commercial properties.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity
of these instruments.
<PAGE>
Liabilities
The carrying amount of mortgage notes payable and notes payable - secured
approximates their fair value since most of the debt has been financed in recent
periods at prevailing market interest rates. The fair value of Notes payable -
unsecured is based on the rates currently offered by the Real Estate Trust for
similar notes. At September 30, 1998 and 1997 the fair value of Notes payable -
unsecured was $51.6 and $47.9 million, respectively.
C. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - THE BANK
Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B. is a federally chartered and federally insured stock
savings bank and, as such, is subject to comprehensive regulation, examination
and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") and by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). The Bank is principally engaged in the
business of attracting deposits from the public and using such deposits,
together with borrowings and other funds, to make loans secured by real estate,
primarily residential mortgage loans, and various types of consumer loans and
commercial loans. The Bank's principal deposit market is the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and
due from banks, interest-bearing deposits, federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to resell.
Regulation D pursuant to the Federal Reserve Act requires the Bank to maintain
reserves in the form of cash and deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank. The total
average reserve balances maintained by the Bank, which consisted primarily of
cash, were $146.5, $114.6, and $105.2 million during the years ended September
30, 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.
LOANS HELD FOR SALE
The Bank engages in mortgage banking activities. At September 30, 1998 and 1997,
loans held for sale are composed of single-family residential loans and home
improvement and related loans originated or purchased for sale in the secondary
market and are carried at aggregate cost which is lower than aggregate market
value. Single-family residential loans held for sale will either be sold or will
be exchanged for mortgage-backed securities and then sold. Gains and losses on
sales of whole loans held for sale are determined using the specific
identification method. See "Trading Securities."
LOANS HELD FOR SECURITIZATION AND SALE
The Bank periodically securitizes and sells certain pools of loan receivables in
the public and private markets. These securitizations are recorded as sales.
Gains on the sale of loans are limited to amounts related to loans existing at
the date of sale and do not include amounts related to loans expected to be sold
during any future reinvestment period.
Loans held for securitization and sale are the lesser of loans eligible for
securitization or loans that management contemplates to securitize within six
months. Such loans held for securitization and sale are reported at the lower of
aggregate cost or aggregate market value for each asset type.
<PAGE>
INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
The Bank classifies its investment and mortgage-backed securities as either
"held-to-maturity," "available-for-sale" or "trading" at the time such
securities are acquired. Investment and mortgage-backed securities classified as
"held-to-maturity" are reported at amortized cost. Investment and
mortgage-backed securities classified as "available-for-sale" are reported at
fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of the related tax effect,
reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Investment and
mortgage-backed securities classified as "trading" are reported at fair value,
with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. All investment securities
and mortgage-backed securities are classified as held-to-maturity at September
30, 1998 and 1997. Premiums and discounts on investment securities and
mortgage-backed securities are amortized or accreted using the level-yield
method. Realized gains and losses are determined using the specific
identification method.
Net unrealized holding gains, net of the related income tax effect, amounted to
$58,000 as of September 30, 1998 and resulted from the transfer of investment
securities and mortgage-backed securities previously classified as
available-for-sale to held-to-maturity, are reported as a separate component of
stockholders' equity and are being accreted over the remaining lives of the
securities using the level-yield method.
TRADING SECURITIES
As part of its mortgage banking activities, the Bank exchanges loans held for
sale for mortgage-backed securities and then sells the mortgage-backed
securities, which are classified as trading securities, to third party investors
in the month of issuance. Proceeds from sales of trading securities were $320.9,
$430.9 and $363.4 million during the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively. The Bank realized net gains of $1.0, $1.2 and $1.2 million
on the sales of trading securities for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997
and 1996, respectively. Gains and losses on sales of trading securities are
determined using the specific identification method. There were no
mortgage-backed securities classified as trading securities at September 30,
1998 and 1997.
At September 30, 1998 and 1997, the Bank held automobile receivables-backed
securities with carrying amounts of $11.3 and $7.9 million, respectively, which
were classified as trading securities. These securities were established in
conjunction with two automobile loan securitization transactions and represent
subordinate classes of certificates retained by the Bank. The Bank recognized
net unrealized holding losses on trading securities of $1.3 million at September
30, 1998. There were no unrealized holding gains or losses on these securities
during the year ended September 30, 1997. See Note 16.
LOAN ORIGINATION AND COMMITMENT FEES
Nonrefundable loan fees, such as origination and commitment fees, and
incremental loan origination costs relating to loans originated or purchased are
deferred. Net deferred fees (costs) related to loans held for investment are
amortized over the life of the loan using the level-yield or straight-line
method. Net fees (costs) related to loans held for sale are deferred until such
time as the loan is sold, at which time the net deferred fees (costs) become a
component of the gain or loss on sale.
<PAGE>
CREDIT CARD FEES AND COSTS
Prior to the sale of the credit card portfolio on September 30, 1998, credit
card membership fees were deferred and recognized as income on a straight-line
basis over the period the fee entitled the cardholder to use the card, which was
one year. Credit card origination costs were deferred and recognized as a
reduction of income on a straight-line basis over the privilege period which was
generally one year. See Note 8.
IMPAIRED LOANS
A loan is considered impaired when, based on all current information and events,
it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according
to the contractual terms of the agreement, including all scheduled principal and
interest payments. Loans reviewed by the Bank for impairment include real estate
and commercial loans and loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring. Large
groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that have not been modified in a
troubled debt restructuring are collectively evaluated for impairment, which for
the Bank include residential mortgage loans and consumer loans. Impaired loans
are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows,
discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient,
impairment may be measured based on the loan's observable market price, or, if
the loan is collateral-dependent, the fair value of the collateral. When the
measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan,
the impairment is recorded through a valuation allowance. Loans for which
foreclosure is probable continue to be accounted for as loans. Prior to the sale
of the credit card portfolio on September 30, 1998, certain credit card loans
for which customers had agreed to modified payment terms were also classified as
impaired loans. See Note 8.
Each impaired real estate or commercial loan is evaluated individually to
determine the income recognition policy. Generally, payments received are
applied in accordance with the contractual terms of the note or as a reduction
of principal. Interest income on impaired credit card loans was recognized using
the interest rate of the loan and the accrual method. Interest income continued
to accrue on delinquent credit card loans until such loan was either paid or
charged off.
At September 30, 1998, the Bank had one impaired real estate loan with a book
value of $86,000. At September 30, 1997, the Bank had two impaired real estate
loans with an aggregate book value of $1.0 million before the related allowance
for losses of $545,000. At September 30, 1997, the Bank had impaired credit card
loans with a carrying value of $116.9 million, before the related allowance for
losses of $18.9 million. The average recorded investment in impaired credit card
and real estate loans for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 was
$113.2, $99.0, and $49.8 million, respectively. The Bank recognized interest
income of $14.4, $13.1, and $7.3 million on its impaired loans for the years
ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
<PAGE>
ALLOWANCES FOR LOSSES
Management reviews the loan, real estate held for investment and real estate
held for sale portfolios to establish allowances for estimated losses. The
allowances for losses are reviewed periodically, and allowances are provided
after consideration of the borrower's financial condition and/or the estimated
value of collateral or real estate, including estimated selling and holding
costs. Allowances are also provided by management after considering such factors
as the economy in lending areas, delinquency statistics and past loss
experience.
The allowances for losses are based on estimates, and ultimate losses may vary
from current estimates. As adjustments to the allowances become necessary,
provisions for losses are reported in operations in the periods they are
determined to be necessary.
ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE ON LOANS
Loans are reviewed on a monthly basis and are placed on non-accrual status when,
in the opinion of management, the full collection of principal or interest has
become unlikely. Uncollectible accrued interest receivable on non-accrual loans
is charged against current period interest income.
REAL ESTATE HELD FOR INVESTMENT OR SALE
Real Estate Held for Investment
At September 30, 1998 and 1997, real estate held for investment consists of
developed land owned by one of the Bank's subsidiaries. Real estate held for
investment is carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. See Note 14.
Real Estate Held for Sale
Real estate held for sale consists of real estate acquired in settlement of
loans ("REO") and is carried at the lower of cost or fair value (less estimated
selling costs). Costs relating to the development and improvement of property,
including interest, are capitalized, whereas costs relating to the holding of
property are expensed. Capitalized interest amounted to $2.0, $2.2 and $3.5
million for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line
method which allocates the cost of the applicable assets over their estimated
useful lives. Major improvements and alterations to office premises and
leaseholds are capitalized. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the
shorter of the terms of the respective leases (including renewal options that
are expected to be exercised) or 20 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged
to operating expenses as incurred.
<PAGE>
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill is stated net of accumulated amortization and is being amortized using
the straight-line method generally over a period of 25 years. At September 30,
1998 and 1997, goodwill totaled $24.4 and $1.1 million, respectively. On
November 12, 1997, the Bank purchased ASB Capital Management Inc. ("ASB"), one
of the largest SEC-registered investment managers headquartered in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, for $27.2 million in cash. In connection
with the purchase, the Bank recorded $25.3 million of goodwill. The acquisition
was accounted for using the purchase method and the operating results of ASB
have been included in the Trust's Consolidated Statements of Operations since
the date of acquisition.
During fiscal 1998 and 1997, the Bank purchased approximately $53.2 and $137.9
million of home equity loans, respectively. The premium attributable to the
value of the home equity relationships, amounting to $6.5 and $7.7 million at
September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively, is included in goodwill and other
intangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This premium is being
amortized over the estimated term of the underlying relationships. Accumulated
amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets was $43.6 and $37.8 million
at September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
SERVICING ASSETS
Effective January 1, 1997, the Bank adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 125 ("SFAS 125"), "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing
of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," which superseded, but
generally retained, the requirements of SFAS No. 122, "Accounting for Mortgage
Servicing Rights" ("SFAS 122"). Both statements require that entities that
acquire servicing assets through either purchase or origination of loans and
sell or securitize those loans with servicing assets retained must allocate the
total cost of the loans to the servicing assets and the loans (without the
servicing assets) based on their relative fair values.
Servicing assets, which are stated net of accumulated amortization, are
amortized in proportion to the remaining net servicing revenues estimated to be
generated by the underlying loans. Amortization of these assets amounted to
$10.8, $9.0 and $7.8 million for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively. Accumulated amortization was $67.7 and $56.9 million at
September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. During fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996,
the Bank recorded $8.6, $15.8 and $16.1 million respectively, of servicing
assets related to the sale and/or securitization of loans.
The Bank periodically evaluates its servicing assets for impairment based upon
fair value. For purposes of evaluating impairment, the Bank stratifies its
servicing assets taking into consideration relevant risk characteristics
including loan type, note rate and date of acquisition. To the extent the
carrying value of servicing assets exceeds the fair value of such assets, a
valuation allowance is recorded. The aggregate fair value of servicing assets at
September 30, 1998 and 1997 was $35.3 and $46.2 million, respectively.
<PAGE>
Activity in the valuation allowance for servicing assets is summarized as
follows.
Year Ended September 30,
----------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- -------------------------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balance at beginning of year $ 1,129 $ 3,142 $ --
Additions charged / (reductions)
credited to loan expenses 12,369 (2,013) 3,142
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance at end of year $ 13,498 $ 1,129 $ 3,142
============== ============== ==============
During fiscal 1996, the Bank sold $947,000 of rights to service mortgage loans
with principal balances of $59.7 million, that were originated by the Bank in
connection with its mortgage banking activities. There were no sales of rights
to service mortgage loans during fiscal 1998 and 1997.
Servicing fees are included in servicing and securitization income in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
INTEREST-ONLY STRIPS
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 125 effective January 1, 1997, the Bank
recognized gains of $33.1 million during fiscal 1997 upon the securitization and
sale of credit card receivables based upon the estimated fair value of the
expected cash flows to be generated by the underlying receivables. Under SFAS
125, the Bank recorded a gain on the securitization and sale of credit card
receivables based on the estimated fair value of assets transferred, retained,
or obtained and liabilities incurred in the sale. The gain recognized at the
time of the sale principally represented the estimated fair value of the
interest-only strips, which represent the present value of finance charges and
other ancillary income received by the trust over the sum of the return paid to
certificateholders, contractual servicing fees, credit losses and other expenses
of the trust. During the revolving period of each transaction, gains were
recorded on the sale of new receivables to the trusts to replenish the
investors' interest in trust receivables. See Note 16.
Prior to January 1, 1997, no gain or loss was recorded on the securitization and
sale of credit card receivables; rather, loan servicing fees were recognized
over the life of the transaction when earned.
Upon the Bank's adoption of SFAS 125, effective January 1, 1997, previously
recognized excess spread assets were reclassified as interest-only strips.
Interest-only strips capitalized in the year ended September 30, 1998 and in the
nine months ended September 30, 1997 amounted to $124.0 and $68.2 million,
respectively, and were related to the securitization and sale of credit card,
home equity, automobile and home loan receivables. See Note 16.
<PAGE>
Prior to January 1, 1997, when loans (other than credit card) were sold with the
residual cash flow retained by the Bank, the net present value of such residual
cash flow was recorded as an adjustment to the sales price of the loans.
Estimated future losses were deducted in the computation of such residual cash
flows. Excess spread assets capitalized in the three months ended December 31,
1996 and in fiscal 1996 of $9.5 and $25.7 million, respectively, were the result
of the residual cash flow retained upon the securitization and sale of home
equity credit line, automobile and home loan receivables.
Interest-only strips (excess spread assets prior to January 1, 1997) are
amortized using the effective yield method over the estimated lives of the
underlying loans. Amortization amounted to $99.0, $24.8 and $17.1 million for
the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively, and is included
in servicing and securitization income in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The Bank uses certain assumptions to calculate amortization of the
interest-only strips (excess spread assets prior to January 1, 1997), mainly
estimates of prepayment speeds and credit losses. To the extent actual results
differ from the assumptions, additional amortization is recorded.
Effective January 1, 1997, the Bank accounts for its interest-only strips as
trading securities and, accordingly, carries them at fair value. The Bank
estimates the fair value of the interest-only strips on a discounted cashflow
basis using appropriate discount and prepayment rates. Mark-to-market
adjustments, included in servicing and securitization income, amounted to a net
loss of $42.9 million in fiscal 1998 and a net gain of $7.0 million in fiscal
1997. Certain assumptions inherent in the determination of the amortization and
fair value of interest-only strips are influenced by factors outside the Bank's
control, and actual performance could materially differ from such assumptions.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Bank uses various strategies to minimize interest-rate risk, including
interest-rate cap agreements and forward sale or purchase commitments. Premiums
paid for interest-rate cap agreements are included in other assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized to expense over the terms of the
interest-rate caps on a straight-line basis. Funds payable to the Bank are
recognized as income in the month such funds are earned. At September 30, 1998
and 1997, unamortized premiums amounted to $0 and $3.1 million, respectively.
Gains and losses on forward sale or purchase commitments are deferred and
recorded as a component of the gain on sales of loans at the time the forward
sale or purchase commitment matures. See Note 28. The Bank does not hold any
derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET ADOPTED
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,"
was issued in June 1998 and establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires that an entity
recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of
financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. SFAS 133 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. The impact of SFAS 133
on the Bank's financial statements has not yet been determined.
<PAGE>
SFAS No. 134, "Accounting for Mortgage-Backed Securities Retained After the
Securitization of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale by a Mortgage Banking Enterprise,
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 65" ("SFAS 134"), was issued in October 1998.
SFAS 134 amends SFAS 65 "Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities" to
require that after the securitization of mortgage loans held for sale, an entity
engaged in mortgage banking activities classify the resulting mortgage-backed
securities or other retained interests based on its ability and intent to sell
or hold those investments. SFAS 134 conforms the subsequent accounting for
securities retained after the securitization of mortgage loans by a mortgage
banking enterprise with the subsequent accounting for securities retained after
the securitization of other types of assets by a nonmortgage banking enterprise.
SFAS 134 is effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning after December 15,
1998.
1. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - REAL ESTATE TRUST
Historically, the Real Estate Trust's total cash requirements have exceeded the
cash generated by its operations. This condition is currently the case and is
expected to continue to be so for the foreseeable future. The Real Estate
Trust's internal sources of funds, primarily cash flow generated by its
income-producing properties, generally have been sufficient to meet its cash
needs other than the repayment of principal on outstanding debt, including
outstanding Unsecured Notes sold to the public, the payment of interest on its
Senior Secured Notes, and the payment of capital improvement costs. In the past,
the Real Estate Trust funded such shortfalls through a combination of external
funding sources, primarily new financings (including the sale of Unsecured
Notes), refinancings of maturing mortgage debt, asset sales and tax sharing and
dividend payments from the Bank.
The Real Estate Trust's ability to meet its liquidity needs, including debt
service payments in fiscal 1999 and subsequent years, will depend in significant
part on its receipt of dividends from the Bank and tax sharing payments from the
Bank pursuant to the tax sharing agreement among the Trust, the Bank, and their
subsidiaries. The availability and amount of tax sharing payments and dividends
in future periods is dependent upon, among other things, the Bank's operating
performance and income, regulatory restrictions on such payments, including
availability of Trust collateral to support such payments, and (in the case of
tax sharing payments), the continued consolidation of the Bank and the Bank's
subsidiaries with the Trust for federal income tax purposes.
The Real Estate Trust believes that the financial condition and operating
results of the Bank in recent periods, as well as the Bank's board resolution
adopted in connection with the release of its written agreement with the OTS
should enhance prospects for the Real Estate Trust to receive tax sharing
payments and dividends from the Bank. During fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, the
Bank made tax sharing payments totaling $5.6, $9.8 and $25.0 million,
respectively, to the Real Estate Trust. During fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, the
Bank made dividend payments totaling $5.2, $7.2 and $6.8 million, respectively,
to the Real Estate Trust.
<PAGE>
In recent years, the operations of the Trust have generated net operating losses
while the Bank has reported net income. It is anticipated that the Trust's
consolidation of the Bank's operations into the Trust's federal income tax
return will result in the use of the Trust's net operating losses to reduce the
federal income taxes the Bank would otherwise owe. If in any future year, the
Bank has taxable losses or unused credits, the Trust would be obligated to
reimburse the Bank for the greater of (i) the tax benefit to the group using
such tax losses or unused tax credits in the group's consolidated federal income
tax returns or (ii) the amount of the refund which the Bank would otherwise have
been able to claim if it were not being included in the consolidated federal
income tax return of the group.
Through September 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust has purchased either in the
open market or through dividend reinvestment 2,091,176 shares of common stock of
Saul Centers, Inc. (representing 16.4% of such company's outstanding common
stock). As of September 30, 1998, the market value of these unpledged shares was
approximately $35.5 million.
In fiscal 1994, the Real Estate Trust refinanced a significant portion of its
outstanding secured indebtedness with the proceeds of the issuance of $175.0
million aggregate principal amount of 11 5/8% Senior Secured Notes due 2002 (the
"1994 Notes"). See Note 4. In March 1998, the Real Estate Trust issued $200.0
million aggregate principal amount of 9 3/4% Senior Secured Notes due 2008 (the
"1998 Notes"). After providing for the retirement of the 1994 Notes, including a
prepayment premium of $10.0 million and debt issuance costs of approximately
$5.9 million, the Real Estate Trust realized approximately $9.1 million in net
proceeds. In addition, the Real Estate Trust received about $13.2 million in
cash which had been held as additional collateral by the indenture agent under
the 1994 Notes. The 1998 Notes are secured by a first priority perfected
security interest in 8,000 shares (80%) of the issued and outstanding common
stock of the Bank, which constitute all of the Bank common stock held by the
Real Estate Trust. The 1998 Notes are nonrecourse obligations of the Real Estate
Trust.
The Real Estate Trust is currently selling Unsecured Notes, with a maturity
ranging from one to ten years, primarily to provide funds to repay maturing
Unsecured Notes. To the degree that the Real Estate Trust does not sell new
Unsecured Notes in an amount sufficient to finance completely the scheduled
repayment of outstanding Unsecured Notes as they mature, it will be required to
finance such repayments from other sources of funds.
In fiscal 1995, the Real Estate Trust established a $15.0 million secured
revolving credit line with an unrelated bank. This facility was for an initial
two-year period subject to extension for one or more additional one-year terms.
In fiscal 1997, the facility was increased to $20.0 million and was renewed for
an additional two-year period. Interest is computed by reference to a floating
rate index. At September 30, 1998, there were no borrowings under the facility
and unrestricted availability was $8.4 million.
In fiscal 1996, the Real Estate Trust established an $8.0 million secured
revolving credit line with an unrelated bank. This facility was for a one-year
term, after which any outstanding loan amount would amortize over a two-year
period. During fiscal 1997, the line of credit was increased to $10.0 million
and was extended for a year. During fiscal 1998, the line of credit was
increased to $20.0 million and was extended for an additional year. Interest is
computed by reference to a floating rate index. At September 30, 1998, there
were no borrowings under the facility and unrestricted availability was $4.3
million.
<PAGE>
During fiscal 1997, the Real Estate Trust refinanced two hotel and three office
properties with five-year floating rate debt. After payment of all financing
costs, the Real Estate Trust received net proceeds of approximately $11.0
million.
As the owner, directly and through two wholly-owned subsidiaries, of a 21.5%
limited partnership interest in Saul Holdings Partnership, the Real Estate Trust
shares in cash distributions from operations and from capital transactions
involving the sale of properties. The partnership agreement of Saul Holdings
Partnership provides for quarterly cash distributions to the partners out of net
cash flow. In fiscal 1998, the Real Estate Trust received total cash
distributions of $5.5 million from Saul Holdings Partnership. Beginning in April
1998 the Real Estate Trust has reinvested its quarterly distributions and
obtained additional partnership units in Saul Holdings.
During the third quarter of fiscal 1997, the Real Estate Trust commenced
development of a 46,000 square foot single-story office research and development
building on 3 acres of its Avenel Business Park land parcel located in
Gaithersburg, Maryland ("Avenel Phase IV"). The Real Estate Trust financed the
project with a construction/permanent loan. The project was substantially
completed in January 1998 and was offered to Saul Holdings in accordance with
the Real Estate Trust's obligations under the Right of First Refusal Agreement.
An independent appraisal of the project indicated a market value of $5,600,000.
The fully funded balance of the loan was $3,657,000, resulting in an equity
position of $1,943,000 for the Real Estate Trust. The Board of Directors of Saul
Centers, Inc., general partner of Saul Holdings, agreed to purchase the Real
Estate Trust's equity position through the issuance of additional limited
partnership units in Saul Holdings. Accordingly, as of April 1, 1998, Saul
Holdings issued 105,922 new limited partnership units and a corresponding
limited partnership interest to the Real Estate Trust in exchange for the
ownership of Avenel Phase IV and the assumption of the loan.
In September 1997, the Real Estate Trust commenced development of a 95-unit
extended stay hotel on a 3 acre parcel located adjacent to its Hampton Inn and
Holiday Inn near Washington Dulles International Airport in Sterling, Virginia.
The new hotel was franchised as a TownePlace Suites by Marriott and opened for
business in August 1998. Development costs were $5.8 million and were largely
financed by a construction loan of $4.5 million. The loan is for two years with
two extension options for two year and one year periods, respectively. The loan
covered all costs except for the land, fees to related parties, taxes and
insurance.
On December 10, 1997, the Real Estate Trust purchased a 308-room Holiday Inn
located in Arlington, Virginia, near Washington National Airport and the Real
Estate Trust's Howard Johnson Hotel. The purchase price was $25.8 million. Also
on December 10, 1997, the Real Estate Trust refinanced five other hotels in its
portfolio. Funds for the two transactions were provided by a lender in the
amount of $52.5 million. The new loans have a 15 year term, a fixed interest
rate of 7.57%, and amortization based on a 25 year schedule.
During the quarter ended June 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust commenced
development of four new extended stay hotels:
<PAGE>
TownePlace Suites by Marriott containing 91 units located on a 2
acre site owned by the Trust in Avenel Business Park in
Gaithersburg, Maryland. Opening is scheduled for mid-April
1999.
TownePlace Suites by Marriott containing 91 units located on part of
a 9 acre site owned by the Real Estate Trust in the Arvida
Park of Commerce in Boca Raton, Florida. Opening is scheduled
for mid-July 1999.
SpringHill Suites by Marriott containing 146 units located on part
of a 9 acre site owned by the Real Estate Trust in the Arvida
Park of Commerce in Boca Raton, Florida. Opening is scheduled
for mid-July 1999.
TownePlace Suites by Marriott containing 95 units located on a 3
acre site owned by the Real Estate Trust in Ft. Lauderdale
Commerce Center, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. Opening is scheduled
for mid-August 1999.
The projected costs for the four hotels aggregate $32 million and will largely
be funded by the proceeds of a three year bank loan in the amount of $25.9
million. The loan has two one-year renewal options.
During the quarter ended June 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust also began
development of a 78,000 square foot single-story office/research and
development building located on a 7 acre site owned by the Real Estate Trust in
Dulles North Corporate Park, Sterling, Virginia. This project is adjacent to the
Real Estate Trust's Dulles North office building and near three of the Real
Estate Trust's hotel properties. The development cost is $6.6 million with bank
financing of $6.5 million for a five-year term and a two-year extension option.
Completion is expected in early fiscal 1999. A lease for approximately 25% of
the space has been signed.
During the quarter ended September 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust began the
conversion of its two hotels located in Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia. The
present 308-room Crystal City Holiday Inn will be converted into a Holiday Inn
Crown Plaza, while the present 279-room Howard Johnsons will be converted into a
Holiday Inn. The new brands are expected to position the hotels to generate
higher room rates and revenues along with improved occupancy levels consistent
with the overall market. The renovations are largely an acceleration of normal
capital improvement work as well as some exterior and interior signage, new
marketing materials and a facade upgrade at the Howard Johnson hotel. A
restaurant, which had been operated by an unaffiliated company, will also be
renovated. The incremental costs for the two conversions are expected to total
$6.3 million, which will be funded by the Real Estate Trust in part from its
internal resources and in part from its lines of credit.
The Real Estate Trust believes that the capital improvement costs for its
income-producing properties will be in the range of $6.5 to $8.0 million per
year for the next several fiscal years.
<PAGE>
2. SAUL HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - REAL ESTATE TRUST
In fiscal 1993, the Real Estate Trust entered into a series of transactions
undertaken in connection with an initial public offering of common stock of a
newly organized corporation, Saul Centers, Inc. ("Saul Centers"). The Real
Estate Trust transferred its 22 shopping centers and one of its office
properties together with the debt associated with such properties to a newly
formed partnership, Saul Holdings Limited Partnership ("Saul Holdings"), in
which the Real Estate Trust owns (directly or through one of its wholly owned
subsidiaries) a 21.7% interest, other entities affiliated with the Real Estate
Trust own a 5.3% interest, and Saul Centers owns a 73.0% interest. B. Francis
Saul II, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Trust, is also Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Saul Centers, which is the
sole general partner of Saul Holdings. As of September 30, 1998, the Real Estate
Trust had pledged 3.6% of its interest in Saul Holdings to the Bank related to
payments under the Tax Sharing Agreement.
In connection with the transfer of its properties to Saul Holdings, the Real
Estate Trust was relieved of approximately $196 million in mortgage debt and
deferred interest. Pursuant to a reimbursement agreement among the partners of
Saul Holdings and its subsidiary limited partnerships (collectively, the
"Partnerships"), the Real Estate Trust and its subsidiaries that are partners in
the Partnerships have agreed to reimburse Saul Centers and the other partners in
the event the Partnerships fail to make payments with respect to certain
portions of the Partnerships' debt obligations and Saul Centers or any such
other partners personally make payments with respect to such debt obligations.
At September 30, 1998, the maximum potential obligations of the Real Estate
Trust and its subsidiaries under this agreement totaled approximately $115.5
million.
The fair market value of each of the properties contributed to the Partnerships
by the Real Estate Trust at the date of transfer (the FMV of each such property)
exceeded the tax basis of such property (with respect to each property, such
excess is referred to as the FMV-Tax Difference). In the event Saul Centers, as
general partner of the Partnerships, causes the Partnerships to dispose of one
or more of such properties, a disproportionately large share of the total gain
for federal income tax purposes would be allocated to the Real Estate Trust or
its subsidiaries. In general, if the gain recognized by the Partnerships on a
property disposition is less than or equal to the FMV-Tax Difference for such
property (as previously reduced by the amounts of special tax allocations of
depreciation deductions to the partners), a gain equal to the FMV-Tax Difference
(as adjusted) will be allocated to the Real Estate Trust. To the extent the gain
recognized by the Partnerships on the property disposition exceeds the FMV-Tax
Difference (as adjusted), such excess generally will be allocated among all the
partners in Saul Holdings based on their relative percentage interests. In
general, the amount of gain allocated to the Real Estate Trust in the event of
such a property disposition is likely to exceed, perhaps substantially, the
amount of cash, if any, distributable to the Real Estate Trust as a result of
the property disposition. In addition, future reductions in the level of the
Partnerships' debt, or any release of the guarantees of such debt by the Real
Estate Trust, could cause the Real Estate Trust to have taxable constructive
distributions without the receipt of any corresponding amounts of cash.
Currently, management does not intend to seek a release of or a reduction in the
guarantees or to convert its limited partner units in Saul Holdings into shares
of Saul Centers common stock.
<PAGE>
At the date of transfer of the Real Estate Trust properties to Saul Holdings,
liabilities exceeded assets transferred by approximately $104.3 million on an
historical cost basis. The assets and liabilities were recorded by Saul Holdings
and Saul Centers at their historical cost rather than market value because of
affiliated ownership and common management and because the assets and
liabilities were the subject of the business combination between Saul Centers
and Saul Holdings, newly formed entities with no prior operations.
Immediately subsequent to the business combination and initial public offering
of common stock by Saul Centers, Saul Centers had total owners' equity of
approximately $16.4 million of which approximately $3.5 million related to the
Real Estate Trust's original 21.5% ownership interest. Recognition by the Real
Estate Trust of the change in its investment in the properties of approximately
$107.8 million has been deferred due to the Real Estate Trust's guarantee of
$115.5 million under the Saul Centers reimbursement agreement. The deferred gain
of $107.8 million is included in "Deferred gains - real estate" in the financial
statements. The gain will be recognized in future periods to the extent the Real
Estate Trust's obligations are terminated under the reimbursement agreement.
The management of Saul Centers has adopted a strategy of maintaining a ratio of
total debt to total asset value, as estimated by management, of fifty percent or
less. The management of Saul Centers has concluded at September 30, 1998 that
the total debt of Saul Centers remains below fifty percent of total asset value.
As a result, the management of the Real Estate Trust has concluded that fundings
under the reimbursement agreement are remote.
In addition to the deferred gains, as of September 30, 1998, the Real Estate
Trust's investment in the consolidated entities of Saul Centers, which is
accounted for under the equity method, consisted of the following.
(In thousands)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Saul Holdings:
Acquisition of partnership units $ 2,892
Distributions in excess of allocated net income (10,190)
Saul Centers:
Acquisition of common shares 33,836
Distributions in excess of allocated net income (6,295)
-------------
Total $ 20,243
=============
The $20.2 million balance is included in "Other assets" in the financial
statements.
As of September 30, 1998, the Real Estate Trust, through its partnership
interest in Saul Holdings and its ownership of common shares of Saul Centers,
effectively owns 33.7% of the consolidated entities of Saul Centers. Some of
these shares and/or units have been deposited as collateral for the Trust's
revolving lines of credit. See Note 4.
The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1998 and
1997, and the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
twelve-month periods ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 of Saul Centers
follow.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Saul Centers, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
September 30,
-------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997
------------------------ ------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Real estate investments $ 342,865 $ 346,253
Accumulated depreciation (100,320) (102,186)
Other assets 26,133 25,182
------------------------ ------------------------
Total assets $ 268,678 $ 269,249
======================== ========================
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
Notes payable $ 288,812 $ 283,370
Other liabilities 17,321 16,184
------------------------ ------------------------
Total liabilities 306,133 299,554
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (37,455) (30,305)
------------------------ ------------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 268,678 $ 269,249
======================== ========================
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Saul Centers, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited) For the Twelve Months Ended September 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue
Base rent $54,724 $51,157 $49,646
Other revenue 15,145 15,613 13,727
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
Total revenue 69,869 66,770 63,373
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
Expenses
Operating expenses 14,423 14,624 14,407
Interest expense 22,669 19,404 18,200
Amortization of deferred debt expense 416 2,286 2,921
Depreciation and amortization 11,299 10,839 10,978
General and administrative 3,492 3,250 3,071
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
Total expenses 52,299 50,403 49,577
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
Operating income 17,570 16,367 13,796
Non-operating item
Sales of interest rate protection
agreements (4,392) (972) --
Net income before extraordinary item,
cumulative effect of change in
accounting method and minority
interests 13,178 15,395 13,796
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting method (771) -- --
Extraordinary item - loss on early
extinguishment of debt (2,878) (956) (998)
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
Net income before minority interest 9,529 14,439 12,798
Minority interest (7,080) (6,854) (6,852)
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
Net income $ 2,449 $ 7,585 $ 5,946
======================== ======================== ========================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
3. INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - REAL ESTATE TRUST
The following table summarizes the cost basis of income-producing properties and
land parcels together with their related debt.
<TABLE>
(Dollars in Buildings and Leasehold Related
thousands) No. Land Improvements Interests Total Debt
- ----------------------------------- ------ --------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
September 30, 1998
Income-producing properties:
Hotels 12 $15,291 $150,514 $ -- $165,805 $111,917
Office & industrial 7 4,555 105,702 -- 110,257 77,103
Other 5 3,075 814 -- 3,889 --
------ --------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
24 $22,921 $257,030 $ -- $279,951 $189,020
====== ========= =============== ========== ========== ==========
Land Parcels 10 $40,110 $ -- $ -- $ 40,110 $ 10,513
====== ========= =============== ========== ========== ==========
September 30, 1997
Income-producing properties:
Hotels 10 $10,843 $117,714 $ -- $128,557 $ 82,914
Office & industrial 7 4,469 105,159 -- 109,628 79,597
Other 6 3,075 1,041 149 4,265 --
------ --------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
23 $18,387 $223,914 $ 149 $242,450 $162,511
====== ========= =============== ========== ========== ==========
Land Parcels 10 $42,160 $ -- $ -- $ 42,160 $ 19,201
====== ========= =============== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
4. DEBT - REAL ESTATE TRUST
Mortgage notes payable are secured by various income-producing properties and
land parcels. Almost all mortgage notes are payable in monthly installments,
have maturity dates ranging to 2012 and accrue interest at annual rates from
7.6% to 10.0%. Certain mortgages contain a number of restrictions, including
cross default provisions.
Notes payable - unsecured includes notes which have been sold by the Real Estate
Trust directly to investors at varying interest rates with maturities of one to
ten years. These notes do not contain any provisions for conversion, sinking
fund or amortization, but are subject to a provision permitting the Real Estate
Trust to call them prior to maturity. The weighted average interest rates at
September 30, 1998 and 1997 were 10.3% and 10.4%, respectively. During fiscal
1998 and 1997, the Real Estate Trust sold notes amounting to approximately $11.3
and $10.0 million, respectively.
<PAGE>
In March 1994, the Real Estate Trust issued $175.0 million aggregate principal
amount of the 1994 Notes. The 1994 Notes were general obligations of the Real
Estate Trust ranking pari passu with all other unsubordinated obligations of the
Trust and were secured by a first priority perfected security interest in 80%
(8,000 shares) of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Bank and by
certain other assets of the Trust as described herein. After paying offering
expenses of $8.9 million, third-party mortgage indebtedness of $74.1 million,
and affiliate indebtedness of $8.9 million, the Real Estate Trust retained $83.1
million of the net proceeds of the offering for application to general corporate
purposes, including a loan to an affiliate of $15.0 million. Of the remaining
amount, approximately $25.8 million was deposited with the Trustee for the 1994
Notes to satisfy one of the initial collateral requirements with respect to such
securities. This collateral requirement, which remained in effect while the 1994
Notes were outstanding, was recalculated each calendar quarter based on the
estimated amount of one year's interest payments on then outstanding 1994 Notes
and Unsecured Notes and could have been satisfied through deposits of cash or
marketable securities. Concurrently with the application of the net proceeds of
the offering to repay third-party mortgage indebtedness, the terms of certain of
the mortgage loans repaid in part were modified to waive deferred interest,
reduce interest rates and extend maturities. After the application of such net
proceeds and the modification of such loans, the final maturity of loans with
total balances of $111.1 million was 12 years and the final maturity of a loan
with a balance of $15.1 million was 15 years. As of September 30, 1997, the Real
Estate Trust was required to maintain deposits of $25.2 million and had
deposited 1,535,104 shares of common stock of Saul Centers (See Note 1) with the
Trustee for the 1994 Notes to satisfy in part the collateral requirements for
those deposits. The common stock of Saul Centers is reflected in other assets in
the accompanying balance sheets.
In March 1998, the Real Estate Trust issued $200.0 million aggregate principal
amount of the 1998 Notes. After providing for the retirement of the 1994 Notes,
including a prepayment premium of $10.0 million and debt issuance costs of
approximately $5.9 million, the Real Estate Trust realized approximately $9.1
million in net proceeds. In addition, the Real Estate Trust received about $13.2
million in cash which had been held as additional collateral by the indenture
agent under the 1994 Notes. The 1998 Notes are secured by a first priority
perfected security interest in 8,000 shares (80%) of the issued and outstanding
common stock of the Bank, which constitute all of the Bank common stock held by
the Real Estate Trust. The 1998 Notes are nonrecourse obligations of the Real
Estate Trust.
In fiscal 1995, the Real Estate Trust established a $15.0 million secured
revolving credit line with an unrelated bank. This facility was for an initial
two-year period subject to extension for one or more additional one-year terms.
In fiscal 1997, the facility was increased to $20.0 million and was renewed for
an additional two-year period. Interest is computed by reference to a floating
rate index. At September 30, 1998, there were no borrowings under the facility
and unrestricted availability was $8.4 million.
In fiscal 1996, the Real Estate Trust established an $8.0 million secured
revolving credit line with an unrelated bank. This facility was for a one-year
term, after which any outstanding loan amount would amortize over a two-year
period. During fiscal 1997, the line of credit was increased to $10.0 million
and was extended for a year. During fiscal 1998, the line of credit was
increased to $20.0 million and was extended for an additional year. Interest is
computed by reference to a floating rate index. At September 30, 1998, there
were no borrowings under the facility and unrestricted availability was $4.3
million.
<PAGE>
The maturity schedule for the Real Estate Trust's outstanding debt at September
30, 1998 for the fiscal years commencing October 1, 1998 is set forth in the
following table.
Debt Maturity Schedule
(In thousands)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Notes Notes
Fiscal Mortgage Payable -- Payable --
Year Notes Secured Unsecured Total
------------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------------
1999 $10,055 $ -- $ 16,149 $ 26,204
2000 10,193 -- 8,893 19,086
2001 12,618 -- 5,916 18,534
2002 14,367 -- 5,284 19,651
2003 12,663 -- 9,046 21,709
Thereafter 138,978 200,000 5,047 344,025
--------- ----------- ----------- --------------
Total $198,874 $200,000 $ 50,335 $ 449,209
--------------------------------------------------------------
Of the $198.9 million of mortgage debt outstanding at September 30, 1998, $169.8
million was nonrecourse to the Real Estate Trust.
5. LONG-TERM LEASE OBLIGATIONS - REAL ESTATE TRUST
The Real Estate Trust has no minimum future rental commitments. The Real Estate
Trust had one long-term lease which terminated in 1998. The Real Estate Trust
paid minimum ground rent expense of $69,000, $101,000 and $101,000 in fiscal
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
6. INCOME FROM COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES - REAL ESTATE TRUST
Income from commercial properties consists of minimum rent arising from
noncancelable commercial leases. Minimum rent for fiscal years 1998, 1997, and
1996 amounted to $21.5, $19.7 and $16.8 million, respectively. Future minimum
rentals as of September 30, 1998 under noncancelable leases are as follows:
Fiscal Year (In thousands)
------------------------------------------------------------
1999 $ 20,919
2000 17,767
2001 13,971
2002 9,258
2003 6,315
Thereafter 7,930
-----------
Total $ 76,160
------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
7. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES - REAL ESTATE TRUST
TRANSACTIONS WITH B. F. SAUL COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
The Real Estate Trust is managed by B. F. Saul Advisory Company (the Advisor), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of B. F. Saul Company ("Saul Co."). All of the Real
Estate Trust officers and three Trustees of the Trust are also officers and/or
directors of Saul Co. The Advisor is paid a fixed monthly fee which is subject
to annual review by the Trustees. The monthly fee was $301,000 during the period
October 1995 through March 1996, $306,000 during the period April 1996 through
September 1996, $311,000 during the period October 1996 through September 1997,
and, $317,000 during the period October 1997 through September 1998. The
advisory contract has been extended until September 30, 1999, and will continue
thereafter unless canceled by either party at the end of any contract year.
Certain loan agreements prohibit termination of this contract.
Saul Co. and Franklin Property Company ("Franklin"), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Saul Co., provide services to the Real Estate Trust through commercial
property management and leasing, hotel management, development and construction
management, and acquisitions, sales and financings of real property. Fees paid
to Saul Co. and Franklin amounted to $5.2, $5.1 and $4.8 million in fiscal 1998,
1997 and 1996, respectively.
The Real Estate Trust reimburses the Advisor and Franklin for costs and expenses
incurred on behalf of the Real Estate Trust, in-house legal expenses, and for
all travel expenses incurred in connection with the affairs of the Real Estate
Trust.
The Real Estate Trust pays the Advisor fees equal to 1% of the principal amount
of the unsecured notes as they are issued to offset its costs of administering
the program. These payments amounted to $113,000, $102,000 and $74,000 in fiscal
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
A subsidiary of Saul Co. is a general insurance agency which receives
commissions and countersignature fees in connection with the Real Estate Trust's
insurance program. Such commissions and fees amounted to approximately $157,000,
$158,000 and $152,000 in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
In April 1994 the Real Estate Trust made an unsecured loan to the Saul Company
of $15.0 million bearing interest at 1/2 percent over prime and due on demand.
In fiscal 1995 the loan balance was reduced to $12.7 million. In fiscal 1996 the
Real Estate Trust made new loans aggregating $3.5 million to the Saul Company.
During fiscal 1997 a curtail of $750,000 was paid by the Saul Company. At
September 30, 1997 the total due the Real Estate Trust was $15.4 million. In
fiscal 1998 the loan balance was reduced to $15.3 million. Interest accrued on
these loans amounted to $1.3, $1.4 and $1.4 million during fiscal 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
REMUNERATION OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
For fiscal years 1998, 1997, and 1996, the Real Estate Trust paid the Trustees
$94,000, $89,000 and $79,000, respectively, for their services. No compensation
was paid to the officers of the Real Estate Trust for acting as such; however,
one Trustee was paid by the Bank for his services as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Bank, and four received payments for their services as
directors of the Bank. Four of the Trustees and all of the officers of the Real
Estate Trust receive compensation from Saul Co. as directors and/or officers.
LEGAL SERVICES
The law firm in which one of the Trustees is a partner received $0.8, $0.3 and
$0.1 million, during fiscal 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively, for legal
services to the Real Estate Trust and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
SAUL HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
The Real Estate Trust accounts for this investment under the equity method. The
Real Estate Trust's share of earnings for fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996 were $2.0,
$3.0 and $2.7 million, respectively. See Note 2.
<PAGE>
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
The Real Estate Trust leases space to the Bank and Franklin at two of its
income-producing properties. Minimum rents and recoveries paid by these
affiliates amounted to approximately $251,000, $239,000 and $143,000, in fiscal
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
8. DISPOSITION OF ASSETS - THE BANK
Pursuant to the terms of a purchase agreement, dated as of September 2, 1998 and
as amended on September 30, 1998, by and between the Bank and CCB Holding
Corporation (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank) ("CCBH"), and First USA
Bank, NA, ("FUSA"), the Bank and CCBH sold their credit card portfolio and the
Bank sold its credit card operations to FUSA. This transaction was consummated
on September 30, 1998. The credit card portfolio purchased by FUSA included
approximately $4.8 billion of managed credit card loans and 3.1 million Visa and
MasterCard credit card accounts. The Bank recognized a net gain on this sale of
$288.3 million, which is included in gain on sale of loans, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
All significant assets and liabilities used in or related directly to the credit
card business, including those associated with credit card securitization
activities, were sold to or assumed by FUSA, with the exception of the Bank's
operations center which housed the majority of credit card operations (other
than origination activities). Concurrently with the transaction, the Bank and
FUSA entered into a lease agreement for that facility.
These financial statements include the results of operations of the credit card
business for the entire fiscal year, as well as the gain on sale, which occurred
on the last day of the Bank's fiscal year.
9. LOANS HELD FOR SALE - THE BANK
Loans held for sale are composed of the following:
September 30,
----------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997
- ------------------------------------------ ---------- ----------
Single-family residential $ 49,502 $ 102,749
Home improvement and related loans 6,785 --
---------- ----------
Total $ 56,287 $ 102,749
========== ==========
10. LOANS HELD FOR SECURITIZATION AND SALE - THE BANK
Loans held for securitization and sale are composed of the following:
September 30,
----------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997
- ------------------------------------------ ---------- -----------
Credit card $ -- $ 90,000
Automobile 125,000 80,000
Home equity -- 50,000
---------- -----------
Total $ 125,000 $ 220,000
========== ===========
<PAGE>
11. INVESTMENT SECURITIES - THE BANK
At September 30, 1998 and 1997, all investment securities are classified as
held-to-maturity. Gross unrealized holding gains and losses on the Bank's
investment securities at September 30, 1998 and 1997 are as follows:
Unrealized Unrealized Aggregate
Amortized Holding Holding Fair
(In thousands) Cost Gains Losses Value
- ---------------------------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------
September 30, 1998
U.S. Government securities:
Maturing after one year,
but within five years $ 43,999 $ 529 $ -- $ 44,528
========= =========== =========== ==========
September 30, 1997
U.S. Government securities:
Maturing within one year $ 4,998 $ 14 $ -- $ 5,012
========= =========== =========== ==========
There were no sales of investment securities during the years ended September
30, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
12. MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES - THE BANK
At September 30, 1998 and 1997, all mortgage-backed securities are classified as
held-to-maturity. Gross unrealized holding gains and losses on the Bank's
mortgage-backed securities at September 30, 1998 and 1997 are as follows:
Gross Gross
Unrealized Unrealized Aggregate
Amortized Holding Holding Fair
(In thousands) Cost Gains Losses Value
- --------------------------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
September 30, 1998
FNMA $ 471,617 $ 3,114 $ (1,927) $ 472,804
FHLMC 408,274 1,558 (982) 408,850
Private label, AAA-rated 1,117,017 -- (12,797) 1,104,220
Private label, AA-rated 28,909 51 (15) 28,945
---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Total $2,025,817 $ 4,723 $ (15,721) $2,014,819
========== =========== =========== ==========
Gross Gross
Unrealized Unrealized Aggregate
Amortized Holding Holding Fair
(In thousands) Cost Gains Losses Value
- --------------------------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
September 30, 1997
FNMA $ 333,563 $ 1,425 $ (1,948) $ 333,040
FHLMC 856,522 6,480 (2,835) 860,167
Private label, AAA-rated 734,632 -- (4,828) 729,804
Private label, AA-rated 60,990 666 -- 61,656
---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Total $1,985,707 $ 8,571 $ (9,611) $1,984,667
========== =========== =========== ==========
<PAGE>
There were no sales of mortgage-backed securities from the held-to-maturity
portfolio during the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996. See Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies - The Bank - "Trading Securities."
Accrued interest receivable on mortgage-backed securities totaled $12.2 and
$11.9 million at September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and is included in
other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
At September 30, 1998, certain mortgage-backed securities were pledged as
collateral for Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta advances, other short-term
borrowings and other recourse arrangements. See Notes 20, 21 and 28. Other
mortgage-backed securities with a book value of $20.9 million were pledged as
collateral primarily for credit and debit card settlement obligations.
13. LOANS RECEIVABLE - THE BANK
Loans receivable is composed of the following:
September 30,
--------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997
- ----------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Single-family residential $ 1,772,784 $ 747,070
Home equity 135,122 44,088
Real estate construction and ground 209,247 106,813
Commercial real estate and multifamily 75,877 53,816
Commercial 279,416 152,483
Credit card -- 987,149
Automobile 232,826 149,868
Home improvement and related loans 60,570 55,453
Overdraft lines of credit and
other consumer 33,484 36,029
-------------- ---------------
2,799,326 2,332,769
Less:
Undisbursed portion of loans 207,921 106,217
Unearned discounts and net
deferred loan origination costs (2,709) (2,026)
Allowance for losses on loans 60,157 105,679
-------------- ---------------
265,369 209,870
-------------- ---------------
Total $ 2,533,957 $ 2,122,899
============== ===============
The Bank serviced loans owned by others amounting to $5,681.2 and $9,731.8
million at September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Accrued interest receivable on loans totaled $15.2 and $19.0 million at
September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and is included in other assets in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
<PAGE>
14. REAL ESTATE HELD FOR INVESTMENT OR SALE - THE BANK
Real estate held for investment or sale is composed of the following:
September 30,
--------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997
- ---------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Real estate held for investment $ 3,819 $ 3,819
Real estate held for sale 218,972 231,407
-------------- --------------
Sub-total 222,791 235,226
-------------- --------------
Less:
Allowance for losses on real estate held
for investment 202 198
Allowance for losses on real estate held
for sale 153,564 140,738
-------------- --------------
153,766 140,936
-------------- --------------
Total real estate held for investment or sale $ 69,025 $ 94,290
============== ==============
Loss on real estate held for investment or sale is composed of the following:
September 30,
----------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ------------------------------ -------------- -------------- --------------
Provision for losses $ (18,860) $ (19,623) $ (26,341)
Net loss from operating
properties (288) (221) (350)
Net gain on sales 2,609 1,156 2,278
-------------- -------------- --------------
Total $ (16,539) $ (18,688) $ (24,413)
============== ============== ==============
<PAGE>
15. ALLOWANCES FOR LOSSES - THE BANK
Activity in the allowances for losses on loans receivable and real estate held
for investment or sale is summarized as follows:
Real Estate
Held for
Loans Investment
(In thousands) Receivable or Sale
- ------------------------------------------------ ---------- -------------
Balance, September 30, 1995 $ 60,496 $ 135,236
Provision for losses 115,740 26,341
Charge-offs (92,047) (34,867)
Recoveries 11,334 --
---------- ------------
Balance, September 30, 1996 95,523 126,710
Provision for losses 125,115 19,623
Increase due to acquisition of loans 118 --
Charge-offs (126,506) (5,397)
Recoveries 11,429 --
---------- ------------
Balance, September 30, 1997 105,679 140,936
Provision for losses 150,829 18,860
Reduction due to sale of credit card portfolio (87,609) --
Charge-offs (122,652) (6,030)
Recoveries 13,910 --
---------- ------------
Balance, September 30, 1998 $ 60,157 $ 153,766
========== ============
The allowances for losses at September 30, 1998 are based on management's
estimates of the amount of allowances required to reflect the losses incurred in
the loan and real estate portfolios based on circumstances and conditions known
at the time. As adjustments to the allowances become necessary, provisions for
losses are reported in operations in the periods they are determined to be
necessary.
16. ASSET-BACKED TRANSACTIONS - THE BANK
The Bank periodically sells various receivables through asset-backed
securitizations, in which receivables are transferred to trusts, and
certificates are sold to investors.
The Bank sold credit card receivables and received gross proceeds of $1,000.5,
$1,084.5 and $919.0 million during the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively. The Bank recognized gains of $83.4 million on credit card
securitization transactions during fiscal 1998, including gains on sales of new
receivables into existing trusts. During fiscal 1997, the Bank recognized gains
of $33.1 million on credit card securitization transactions, including sales of
new receivables into existing trusts. No gains or losses were recorded on credit
card securitization transactions during fiscal 1996. See Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies - The Bank. At September 30, 1997, outstanding trust
certificate balances related to these and previous securitizations were $4,015.2
million and the related receivable balances contained in the trusts were
$4,659.7 million. On September 30, 1998, the Bank sold its credit card portfolio
and related operations, including its rights to the excess cash flows generated
from such credit card securitizations. See Note 8.
<PAGE>
The Bank sold amounts on deposit in certain spread accounts associated with
certain outstanding credit card securitizations and received gross proceeds of
$36.0, $144.2 and $42.1 million during fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Losses of $1.8 and $7.2 million were recognized for the years ended September
30, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and are included in servicing and
securitization income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No gains or
losses were recorded for the year ended September 30, 1996. Outstanding trust
certificate balances related to the securitizations were $225.9 million at
September 30, 1997. On September 30, 1998, the Bank sold its credit card
portfolio and related operations, including its obligations associated with such
spread account securitizations. See Note 8.
The Bank sold automobile loan receivables and received gross proceeds of $534.7,
$938.9 and $475.3 million during the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively. Gains recognized on these transactions were $23.1, $26.9 and
$7.3 million, respectively, for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and
1996. The outstanding trust certificate balances and the related receivable
balances contained in the trusts were $1,055.7 million at September 30, 1998,
$12.6 million of which represents subordinate classes of certificates retained
by the Bank. The outstanding trust certificate balances and the related
receivable balances contained in the trusts were $1,083.0 million at September
30, 1997, $7.9 million of which represents a subordinate class of certificates
retained by the Bank. These retained certificates were classified as trading
securities at September 30, 1998 and 1997 and had carrying values of $11.3 and
$7.9 million, respectively. See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - The
Bank. The Bank continues to service the underlying loans and is contingently
liable under various credit enhancement facilities related to these
transactions. See Note 28.
The Bank sold home equity credit line receivables and received gross proceeds of
$181.4, $24.0 and $96.5 million during the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997
and 1996, respectively. The Bank recognized gains of $13.8, $3.4 and $4.7
million on home equity credit line transactions during the years ended September
30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively, including gains on sale of new
receivables into existing trusts for fiscal 1998 and 1997. The outstanding trust
certificate balances and the related receivable balances contained in the trusts
were $305.7 million at September 30, 1998 and $325.8 million at September 30,
1997. The Bank continues to service the underlying loans and is contingently
liable under various credit enhancement facilities related to these
transactions. See Note 28.
During the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, the Bank sold home loan and
home equity receivables in asset-backed transactions to investors representing
interests in the trusts. The gross proceeds received on these sales were $163.3
and $216.2 million for the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1997,
respectively. The gains recognized on these transactions were $8.8 and $11.2
million for the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. At
September 30, 1998, the outstanding trust certificate balances and the related
receivable balances contained in the trust were $148.0 million and the Bank
serviced the underlying loans. At September 30, 1997, the outstanding trust
certificate balances and the related receivable balances contained in the trust
were $133.3 million. See Note 28.
<PAGE>
The Bank sold home loan receivables and received gross proceeds of $4.0, $154.4
and $153.5 million for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. Gains recognized on these transactions were $0.4, $7.2 and $9.5
million for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The
outstanding trust certificate balances and the related receivable balances
contained in the trusts were $168.7 million at September 30, 1998 and $246.8
million at September 30, 1997. The Bank continues to service the underlying
loans and is contingently liable under credit enhancement facilities related to
these transactions. See Note 28.
17. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - THE BANK
Property and equipment is composed of the following:
Estimated September 30,
Useful --------------------------------
(In thousands) Lives 1998 1997
- -------------------------- ---------------- -------------- ---------------
Land -- $ 51,044 $ 49,925
Construction in progress -- 8,830 1,950
Buildings and improvements 10-45 years 129,716 122,326
Leasehold improvements 5-20 years 90,967 83,526
Furniture and equipment 5-10 years 188,705 182,044
Automobiles 3-5 years 2,336 2,303
-------------- ---------------
471,598 442,074
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization 185,682 168,512
-------------- ---------------
Total $ 285,916 $ 273,562
============== ===============
Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $34.0, $28.7 and $24.6 million
for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
<PAGE>
18. LEASES - THE BANK
The Bank has noncancelable, long-term leases for office premises and retail
space, which have a variety of terms expiring from fiscal 1999 to 2019 and
ground leases which have terms expiring from fiscal 2029 to 2080. These leases
are accounted for as operating leases. Some of the leases are subject to rent
adjustments in the future based upon changes in the Consumer Price Index and
some also contain renewal options. The following is a schedule by years of
future minimum lease payments required at September 30, 1998:
Year Ending
September 30, (In thousands)
------------- -------------
1999 $ 14,631
2000 13,832
2001 12,411
2002 10,621
2003 9,099
Thereafter 71,049
-------------
Total $ 131,643
=============
Rent expense totaled $16.6, $16.1 and $13.5 million for the years ended
September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
19. DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS - THE BANK
An analysis of deposit accounts and the related weighted average effective
interest rates at year-end are as follows:
September 30,
--------------------------------------------------
1998 1997
------------------------ ------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Rate Amount Rate
- --------------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ----------
Demand accounts $ 302,529 -- $ 215,678 --
NOW accounts 1,027,310 1.32% 904,697 2.42%
Money market deposit
accounts 1,019,569 3.62% 983,016 3.97%
Statement savings accounts 913,467 2.41% 907,141 3.48%
Other deposit accounts 97,696 2.10% 79,071 2.99%
Certificate accounts, less
than $100 1,157,603 5.20% 1,156,724 5.50%
Certificate accounts, $100
or more 370,056 5.69% 647,429 5.69%
------------ ------------
Total $ 4,888,230 3.19% $ 4,893,756 3.99%
============ ============
<PAGE>
Interest expense on deposit accounts is composed of the following:
Year Ended September 30,
----------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- --------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
NOW accounts $ 19,796 $ 21,882 $ 23,044
Money market deposit accounts 38,756 38,644 38,317
Statement savings accounts 28,419 30,927 30,034
Certificate accounts 89,958 75,180 69,180
Other deposit accounts 2,389 2,274 1,994
------------ ------------ ------------
Total $ 179,318 $ 168,907 $ 162,569
============ ============ ============
Outstanding certificate accounts at September 30, 1998 mature in the years
indicated as follows:
Year Ending
September 30, (In thousands)
------------- --------------
1999 $ 1,236,272
2000 190,466
2001 40,076
2002 29,257
2003 31,588
--------------
Total $ 1,527,659
==============
At September 30, 1998, certificate accounts of $100,000 or more have contractual
maturities as indicated below:
(In thousands)
-----------
Three months or less $ 229,540
Over three months through six months 59,546
Over six months through 12 months 54,525
Over 12 months 26,445
-----------
Total $ 370,056
===========
<PAGE>
20. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS AND OTHER
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS - THE BANK
Short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:
September 30,
-----------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ------------------------------------------------ --------- --------- ---------
Securities sold under repurchase agreements:
Balance at year-end $ 387,305 $ 2,606 $ 576,823
Average amount outstanding during the year 302,564 483,076 59,687
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end 806,393 946,090 576,823
Amount maturing within 30 days 387,305 2,606 576,576
Weighted average interest rate during the year 5.68% 5.48% 5.50%
Weighted average interest rate on year-end
balances 5.63% 5.35% 5.41%
Other short-term borrowings:
Balance at year-end $ 104,449 $ 72,215 $ 60,318
Average amount outstanding during the year 72,826 39,126 13,641
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end 107,845 72,241 60,318
Amount maturing within 30 days 104,449 72,215 60,318
Weighted average interest rate during the year 5.08% 5.11% 5.04%
Weighted average interest rate on year-end
balances 5.19% 5.34% 5.63%
The investment and mortgage-backed securities underlying the repurchase
agreements were delivered to the dealers who arranged the transactions. The
dealers may have loaned such securities to other parties in the normal course of
their operations and agreed to resell to the Bank the identical securities at
the maturities of the agreements.
At September 30, 1998, the Bank had pledged mortgage-backed securities with a
book value of $162.3 million to secure certain other short-term borrowings.
21. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES - THE BANK
At September 30, 1998, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta
("FHLB") totaled $352.0 million. Of the total advances at September 30, 1998,
$275.0 million have a weighted average interest rate of 5.55%, adjust quarterly
based on the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and mature over
varying periods between October 1998 and January 1999. The weighted average
interest rate on the remaining $77.0 million is 6.14%, which is fixed for the
term of the advances and which mature over varying periods between October 1998
and June 2013.
Under a Specific Collateral Agreement with the FHLB, advances are secured by all
of the Bank's FHLB stock and certain mortgage-backed securities with a book
value of $1,134.2 million. The FHLB requires that members maintain qualifying
collateral at least equal to 100% of the member's outstanding advances at all
times. The collateral held by the FHLB in excess of the September 30, 1998
advances is available to secure additional advances from the FHLB, subject to
its collateralization guidelines.
<PAGE>
22. CAPITAL NOTES - SUBORDINATED - THE BANK
Capital notes, which are subordinated to the interest of deposit account holders
and other senior debt are composed of the following:
September 30,
Issue ------------------- Interest
(Dollars in thousands) Date 1998 1997 Rate
- -------------------------------- ----------------- --------- --------- -------
Subordinated debentures due 2005 November 23, 1993 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 9 1/4%
Subordinated debentures due 2008 December 3, 1996 100,000 100,000 9 1/4%
--------- ---------
Total $ 250,000 $ 250,000
========= =========
The 9 1/4% Subordinated Debentures due 2008 (the "1996 Debentures") are subject
to redemption at any time on or after December 1, 2001, at the option of the
Bank, in whole or in part, at the following redemption prices plus accrued and
unpaid interest:
If redeemed during the 12-month period Redemption
beginning December 1, Price
- --------------------------------------------- --------------
(In thousands)
2001 $ 104.625
2002 $ 103.700
2003 $ 102.775
2004 $ 101.850
2005 $ 100.925
2006 and thereafter $ 100.000
The 9 1/4% Subordinated Debentures due 2005 (the "1993 Debentures") are subject
to redemption at any time on or after December 1, 1998, at the option of the
Bank, in whole or in part, at the following redemption prices plus accrued and
unpaid interest:
If redeemed during the 12-month period Redemption
beginning December 1, Price
- --------------------------------------------- --------------
(In thousands)
1998 $ 104.625
1999 $ 103.700
2000 $ 102.775
2001 $ 101.850
2002 $ 100.925
2003 and thereafter $ 100.000
<PAGE>
The indenture pursuant to which the 1993 Debentures were sold (the "Indenture")
provides that the Bank may not pay dividends on its capital stock unless, after
giving effect to the dividend, no event of default shall have occurred and be
continuing and the Bank is in compliance with its regulatory capital
requirements. In addition, the amount of the proposed dividend may not exceed
the sum of (i) $15.0 million, (ii) 66 2/3% of the Bank's consolidated net income
(as defined in the Indenture) accrued on a cumulative basis commencing on
October 1, 1993 and (iii) the aggregate net cash proceeds received by the Bank
after October 1, 1993 from the sale of qualified capital stock or certain debt
securities, minus the aggregate amount of any restricted payments made by the
Bank. Notwithstanding the above restrictions on dividends, provided no event of
default has occurred or is continuing, the Indenture does not restrict the
payment of dividends on the 13% Preferred Stock (as defined below) or any
payment-in-kind preferred stock issued in lieu of cash dividends on the
Preferred Stock or the redemption of any such payment-in-kind preferred stock.
The indenture pursuant to which the 1996 Debentures were sold provides that the
proposed dividend may not exceed the sum of the restrictions discussed above for
the 1993 Indenture and the aggregate liquidation preference of the new series of
preferred stock of the Bank, if issued in exchange for the outstanding REIT
Preferred Stock (as defined below). See Note 23.
The Bank received OTS approval to include the principal amount of the 1996
Debentures and the 1993 Debentures in the Bank's supplementary capital for
regulatory capital purposes.
Deferred debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization, amounted to $8.6
and $9.4 million at September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and are included
in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
23. real estate investment trust subsidiary - THE BANK
On December 3, 1996, a new real estate investment trust subsidiary of the Bank
(the "REIT Subsidiary") sold $150.0 million of its Noncumulative Exchangeable
Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $5.00 per share (the "REIT Preferred
Stock"), and received net cash proceeds of $144.0 million. Cash dividends on the
REIT Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears at an annual rate of 10
3/8%. The liquidation value of each share of REIT Preferred Stock is $50,000
plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Except under certain limited circumstances,
the holders of the REIT Preferred Stock have no voting rights. The REIT
Preferred Stock is automatically exchangeable for a new series of Preferred
Stock of the Bank upon the occurrence of certain events.
The REIT Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the REIT subsidiary at
any time on or after January 15, 2007, in whole or in part, at the following per
share redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid dividends:
If redeemed during the 12-month period Redemption
beginning January 15, Price
- --------------------------------------- --------------
(In thousands)
2007 $ 52.594
2008 $ 52.075
2009 $ 51.556
2010 $ 51.038
2011 $ 50.519
2012 and thereafter $ 50.000
<PAGE>
The Bank received OTS approval to include the proceeds from the sale of the REIT
Preferred Stock in the core capital of the Bank for regulatory capital purposes
in an amount up to 25% of the Bank's core capital. The net cash proceeds from
the sale of the REIT Preferred Stock is reflected in minority interest - other
in the Trust's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Dividends on the REIT Preferred
Stock are presented as a reduction of net income in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
24. PREFERRED STOCK - THE BANK
Cash Dividends on the Bank's Noncumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A
(the "Preferred Stock") are payable quarterly in arrears at an annual rate of
13%. If the Board of Directors does not declare the full amount of the
noncumulative cash dividend accrued in respect of any quarterly dividend period,
in lieu thereof the Board of Directors will be required to declare (subject to
regulatory and other restrictions) a stock dividend in the form of a new series
of payment-in-kind preferred stock of the Bank.
The OTS has approved the inclusion of the Preferred Stock as tier 1 or core
capital and has approved the payment of dividends on the Preferred Stock,
provided certain conditions are met. The holders of the Preferred Stock have no
voting rights, except in certain limited circumstances.
Holders of the Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive a liquidating
distribution in the amount of $25,000 per share, plus accrued and unpaid
dividends for the then-current dividend period in the event of any voluntary
liquidation of the Bank, after payment of the deposit accounts and other
liabilities of the Bank, and out of the assets available for distribution to
shareholders. The Preferred Stock ranks superior and prior to the issued and
outstanding common stock of the Bank with respect to dividend and liquidation
rights.
The Preferred Stock is redeemable by the Bank at its option at any time on and
after May 1, 2003, in whole or in part, at the following per share redemption
prices in cash, plus, in each case, an amount in cash equal to accrued and
unpaid dividends for the then-current dividend period:
If redeemed during the 12-month period Redemption
beginning May 1, Price
- --------------------------------------- --------------
(In thousands)
2003 $ 27.250
2004 $ 27.025
2005 $ 26.800
2006 $ 26.575
2007 $ 26.350
2008 $ 26.125
2009 $ 25.900
2010 $ 25.675
2011 $ 25.450
2012 $ 25.225
2013 and thereafter $ 25.000
<PAGE>
25. RETIREMENT PLAN - THE BANK
The Bank participates in a defined contribution profit sharing retirement plan
(the "Plan") which covers those full-time employees who meet the requirements as
specified in the Plan. The Plan, which can be modified or discontinued at any
time, requires participating employees to contribute 2.0% of their compensation.
Corporate contributions, at the discretionary amount of three times the employee
contribution, were $7.3, $5.6 and $4.7 million for the years ended September 30,
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. There are no past service costs associated
with the Plan and the Bank has no liability under the Plan other than its
current contributions. The Plan owns 4.0% of the Bank's common stock.
<PAGE>
26. REGULATORY MATTERS - THE BANK
Under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989
("FIRREA"), the Bank's regulatory capital requirements at September 30, 1998
were a 1.5% tangible capital requirement, a 3.0% core capital requirement and an
8.0% total risk-based capital requirement. Under the OTS "prompt corrective
action" regulations, the Bank must maintain minimum leverage, tier 1 risk-based
and total risk-based capital ratios of 4.0%, 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively, to
meet the ratios established for "adequately capitalized" institutions. At
September 30, 1998, the Bank was in compliance with its tangible, core and total
risk-based regulatory capital requirements and exceeded the capital standards
established for "well capitalized" institutions under the "prompt corrective
action" regulations. The information below is based upon the Bank's
understanding of the applicable FIRREA and "prompt corrective action"
regulations and related interpretations.
<TABLE>
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
------------------------------------------------------------------
MINIMUM EXCESS
ACTUAL CAPITAL REQUIREMENT CAPITAL
---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------
As a % of As a % of As a % of
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Assets(4) Amount Assets Amount Assets
- -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Capital per financial statements $ 464,757
Minority interest in REIT
Subsidiary(1) 144,000
Net unrealized holding gains(2) (58)
Adjusted capital 608,699
Adjustments for tangible and
core capital:
Intangible assets (63,144)
Non-allowable minority interest
in REIT Subsidiary(1) (11,433)
Non-includable subsidiaries(3) (3,852)
Total tangible capital 530,270 7.93% $ 100,253 1.50% $ 430,017 6.43%
---------- ========== ========== =========== ========= ==========
Total core capital(4) 530,270 7.93% $ 267,342 4.00% $ 262,928 3.93%
---------- ========== ========== =========== ========= ==========
Tier 1 risk-based capital(4) 530,270 12.93% $ 172,572 4.00% $ 357,698 8.93%
---------- ========== ========== =========== ========= ==========
Adjustments for total risk-based
capital:
Subordinated capital debentures 250,000
Allowance for general loan
losses 53,036
Total supplementary capital 303,036
Total available capital 833,306
Equity investments(3) (11,133)
----------
Total risk-based capital(4) $ 822,173 20.70 % $ 345,143 8.00% $ 477,030 12.70%
========== ========== ========== =========== ========= ==========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
(1) Eligible for inclusion in core capital in an amount up to 25% of the
Bank's core capital pursuant to authorization from the OTS.
(2) Pursuant to OTS policy, net unrealized holding gains (losses) are excluded
from regulatory capital.
(3) Reflects an aggregate offset of $788,000 representing the allowance for
general loan losses maintained against the Bank's equity investments and
non-includable subsidiaries which, pursuant to OTS guidelines, is available
as a credit against the deductions from capital otherwise required for such
investments.
(4) Under the OTS "prompt corrective action" regulations, the standards for
classification as "well capitalized" are a leverage (or "core capital")
ratio of at least 5.0%, a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0%
and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%.
<PAGE>
At September 30, 1997, the Bank was in compliance with its tangible, core and
total risk-based regulatory capital requirements and exceeded the capital
standards established for "well capitalized" institutions under the "prompt
corrective action" regulations. The information below is based upon the Bank's
understanding of the applicable FIRREA and "prompt corrective action"
regulations and related interpretations.
<TABLE>
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
------------------------------------------------------------------
MINIMUM EXCESS
ACTUAL CAPITAL REQUIREMENT CAPITAL
---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------
As a % of As a % of As a % of
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Assets(4) Amount Assets Amount Assets
- -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Capital per financial statements $ 363,246
Minority interest in REIT
Subsidiary(1) 144,000
Net unrealized holding gains(2) 493
Adjusted capital 507,739
Adjustments for tangible and
core capital:
Intangible assets (44,251)
Non-allowable minority interest
in REIT Subsidiary(1) (38,758)
Non-includable subsidiaries(3) (3,762)
Total tangible capital 420,968 6.96% $ 90,715 1.50% $ 330,253 5.46%
---------- ========== ========== =========== ========= ==========
Total core capital(4) 420,968 6.96% $ 241,907 4.00% $ 179,061 2.96%
---------- ========== ========== =========== ========= ==========
Tier 1 risk-based capital(4) 420,968 7.24% $ 232,713 4.00% $ 188,255 3.24%
---------- ========== ========== =========== ========= ==========
Adjustments for total risk-based
capital:
Subordinated capital debentures 250,000
Allowance for general loan
losses 92,962
Total supplementary capital 342,962
Excess allowance for loan losses (19,989)
Adjusted supplementary capital 322,973
Total available capital 743,941
Equity investments(3) (14,556)
----------
Total risk-based capital(4) $ 729,385 13.50 % $ 465,426 8.00% $ 263,959 5.50%
========== ========== ========== =========== ========= ==========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
(1) Eligible for inclusion in core capital in an amount up to 25% of the
Bank's core capital pursuant to authorization from the OTS.
(2) Pursuant to OTS policy, net unrealized holding gains (losses) are excluded
from regulatory capital.
(3) Reflects an aggregate offset of $964,000 representing the allowance for
general loan losses maintained against the Bank's equity investments and
non-includable subsidiaries which, pursuant to OTS guidelines, is available
as a credit against the deductions from capital otherwise required for such
investments.
(4) Under the OTS "prompt corrective action" regulations, the standards for
classification as "well capitalized" are a leverage (or "core capital")
ratio of at least 5.0%, a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0%
and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%.
<PAGE>
At September 30, 1998 and 1997, the Bank had $4.1 and $4.0 million,
respectively, in loans to and investments in subsidiaries engaged in activities
impermissible for national banks ("non-includable subsidiaries") which were
fully deducted from all three capital requirements. At September 30, 1998 and
1997, the Bank also had two equity investments with an aggregate balance, after
subsequent valuation allowances, of $11.7 and $15.3 million, respectively, which
were fully deducted from total risk-based capital.
OTS capital regulations provide a five-year holding period (or such longer
period as may be approved by the OTS) for REO to qualify for an exception from
treatment as an equity investment. If an REO property is considered an equity
investment, its then-current book value is deducted from total risk-based
capital. Accordingly, if the Bank is unable to dispose of any REO property
(through bulk sales or otherwise) prior to the end of its applicable five-year
holding period and is unable to obtain an extension of such five-year holding
period from the OTS, the Bank could be required to deduct the then-current book
value of such REO property from total risk-based capital. In February 1998, the
Bank received from the OTS an extension of the holding periods for certain of
its REO properties through February 17, 1999. The following table sets forth the
Bank's REO at September 30, 1998, after valuation allowances of $166.9 million,
by the fiscal year in which the property was acquired through foreclosure.
Fiscal Year (In thousands)
----------- --------------
1990 $ 19,023(1)(2)
1991 36,619(2)
1992 100(2)
1993 --
1994 732
1995 5,907
1996 --
1997 --
1998 3,027
---------
Total REO $ 65,408
=========
(1) Includes REO with an aggregate net book value of $11.1 million, which the
Bank treats as equity investments for regulatory capital purposes.
(2) Includes REO with an aggregate net book value of $44.6 million, for which
the Bank received an extension of the holding periods through February 17,
1999.
At the request of the OTS, the Board of Directors of the Bank adopted a
resolution in March 1996 which, among other things, permits the Bank: (i) to
make tax sharing payments without OTS approval to the Trust of up to $15.0
million relating to any single fiscal year; and (ii) to declare dividends on its
stock in any quarterly period up to the lesser of (a) 50% of its after tax net
income for the immediately preceding quarter or (b) 50% of the average quarterly
after tax net income for the immediately preceding four quarter period, minus
(in either case) dividends declared on the Bank's preferred stock during that
quarterly period. The resolution also provides that the Bank will present a plan
annually to the OTS detailing anticipated consumer loan securitization activity.
<PAGE>
27. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES - THE BANK
Loans Receivable
From time to time, in the normal course of business, the Bank may make loans to
executive officers and directors, their immediate family members or companies
with which they are affiliated. These loans are on substantially the same terms
as similar loans with unrelated parties. An analysis of activity with respect to
these loans for the year ended September 30, 1998 is as follows:
(In thousands)
---------------
Balance, September 30, 1997 $ 2,432
Additions 3,276
Reductions (2,313)
---------------
Balance, September 30, 1998 $ 3,395
================
Services
B. F. Saul Company, which is a shareholder of the Trust, and its subsidiaries
provide certain services to the Bank. These services include property
management, insurance brokerage and leasing. Fees for these services were
$24,000, $42,000 and $366,000 for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
The law firm in which one director of the Bank is a partner received $4.6, $4.9
and $3.2 million for legal services rendered to the Bank during the years ended
September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 respectively.
For the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, one of the directors of
the Bank was paid $75,000, $50,000 and $37,000, respectively, for consulting
services rendered to the Bank. Another director of the Bank was paid total fees
of $100,000 for each of the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively, for consulting services. A third director of the Bank was paid
$50,000 and $17,000 for consulting services rendered to the Bank for the years
ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Tax Sharing Agreement
The Bank and the other companies in the Trust's affiliated group are parties to
a tax sharing agreement dated June 28, 1990 (the "Tax Sharing Agreement"). The
Tax Sharing Agreement provides for payments to be made by members of the Trust's
affiliated group to the Trust based on their separate company tax liabilities.
The Tax Sharing Agreement also provides that, to the extent net operating losses
or tax credits of a particular member are used to reduce the overall tax
liability of the Trust's affiliated group, such member will be reimbursed by the
other members of the affiliated group that have taxable income in an amount
equal to such tax reduction. The Bank paid $5.6, $9.8 and $25.0 million to the
Trust during fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively, under the Tax Sharing
Agreement. OTS approval of the tax sharing payments during fiscal 1998, 1997 and
1996 was conditioned on a pledge by the Trust of certain assets to secure
certain of its obligations under the Tax Sharing Agreement. Under the terms of
the Bank's board resolution, the Bank is permitted to make tax sharing payments
to the Trust of up to $15.0 million relating to any fiscal year without OTS
approval. See Note 26. At September 30, 1998, the estimated tax sharing payment
payable to the Trust by the Bank was $6.6 million. There was no tax sharing
payment payable to the Trust by the Bank at September 30, 1997.
<PAGE>
Other
The Bank paid $5.0, $4.9 and $4.5 million for office space leased from or
managed by companies affiliated with the Bank or its directors during the years
ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
The Trust, the B. F. Saul Company, Chevy Chase Lake Corporation ("Lake") and Van
Ness Square Corporation, affiliates of the Bank, from time to time maintain
interest-bearing deposit accounts with the Bank. Those accounts totaled $28.0
and $26.5 million at September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The Bank paid
interest on the accounts amounting to $0.9, $0.6 and $1.1 million during fiscal
years ended 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
28. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - THE BANK
The Bank, in the normal course of business, is a party to financial instruments
with off-balance-sheet risk and other derivative financial instruments to meet
the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments
to extend credit at both fixed and variable rates, letters of credit,
interest-rate cap agreements and assets sold with limited recourse. All such
financial instruments are held or issued for purposes other than trading.
These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
The contract or notional amount of these instruments reflect the extent of
involvement the Bank has in particular classes of financial instruments. For
interest-rate cap agreements, assets sold with limited recourse and forward
purchase and sale commitments, the contract or notional amounts do not represent
exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party. The
Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. The Bank is also a
party to derivative financial instruments that do not have off-balance-sheet
risk (e.g., interest-rate cap agreements).
Commitments to Extend Credit
The Bank had approximately $1.1 billion of commitments to extend credit at
September 30, 1998. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the
contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination
clauses and may require payment of a fee. Because many of the commitments are
expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. These commitments are subject to
the Bank's normal underwriting and credit evaluation policies and procedures.
Standby Letters of Credit
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to
guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. At September 30, 1998,
the Bank had written standby letters of credit in the amount of $31.4 million,
which were issued to guarantee the performance of and irrevocably assure payment
by customers under construction projects.
<PAGE>
Of the total, $18.9 million will expire in fiscal 1999 and the remainder will
expire over time through fiscal 2001. The credit risk involved in issuing
standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending
loan commitments to customers. Mortgage-backed securities with a book value of
$3.8 million were pledged as collateral for certain of these letters of credit
at September 30, 1998.
Recourse Arrangements
The Bank is obligated under various recourse provisions (primarily related to
credit losses) related to the securitization and sale of receivables. As a
result of these recourse provisions, the Bank maintained restricted cash
accounts and overcollateralization of receivables amounting to $110.2 and $12.5
million, respectively, at September 30, 1998, and $117.7 and $8.0 million,
respectively, at September 30, 1997, both of which are included in other assets
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, the Bank owned subordinated
automobile receivables-backed securities with carrying values of $11.3 and $8.0
million at September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively, which were classified as
trading securities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Bank is also obligated under various recourse provisions related to the swap
of single-family residential loans for mortgage-backed securities issued by the
Bank. At September 30, 1998, recourse to the Bank under these arrangements was
$6.5 million, consisting of restricted cash accounts amounting to $2.6 million
and overcollateralization of receivables of $3.9 million.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest-rate cap agreements are used to limit the Bank's exposure to rising
short-term interest rates related to the retained portion of certain of its
asset-backed securitizations. At September 30, 1998, the Bank was a party to two
interest-rate cap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $205.6 million
with maturity dates ranging from October 15, 1998 through June 30, 1999. One of
the interest-rate cap agreements with a notional amount of $200.0 million
entitles the Bank to receive compensatory payments from the cap provider, which
is a AAA-rated (by Standard & Poor's) counterparty, equal to the product of (a)
the amount by which the one-month LIBOR exceeds 7.00% and (b) the then
outstanding notional principal amount for a predetermined period of time. The
second interest-rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $5.6 million
entitles the Bank to receive compensatory payments from the cap provider, which
is a AA-rated (for long term debt as rated by Standard & Poor's) counterparty,
equal to the product of (a) the amount by which the one-month LIBOR exceeds
9.00% and (b) the then outstanding notional principal amount for the
predetermined period of time. The Bank has no obligation to make payments to the
provider of the cap or any other party. The Bank is exposed to credit losses in
the event of nonperformance by the counterparty, but does not expect the
counterparty to fail to meet its obligation given its credit rating.
To manage the potentially adverse impact of interest rate movements on its held
for sale fixed-rate mortgage loan pipeline, the Bank hedges its pipeline by
entering into whole loan and mortgage-backed security forward sale commitments
and mortgage-backed security forward purchase commitments. Forward sale
commitments are used to sell specific financial instruments (whole loans or
mortgage-backed securities) at a future date for a specified price.
<PAGE>
At September 30, 1998, the Bank had mortgage-backed security forward sale
commitments of $39.1 million. At September 30, 1998, the Bank had no whole loan
forward sale commitments. In addition, at September 30, 1998, the Bank had $12.9
million in mortgage security forward purchase commitments related to its hedging
activities. Forward commitments generally settle within 90 days. Gains and
losses are deferred and recorded as a component of the gain on sales of loans at
the time the forward commitment matures.
Concentrations of Credit
The Bank's principal real estate lending market is the metropolitan Washington,
D.C. area. In addition, a significant portion of the Bank's consumer loan
portfolio was generated by customers residing in the metropolitan Washington,
D.C. area. Service industries and federal, state and local governments employ a
significant portion of the Washington, D.C. area labor force. Adverse changes in
economic conditions could have a direct impact on the timing and amount of
payments by borrowers.
<PAGE>
29. ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - THE BANK
The majority of the Bank's assets and liabilities are financial instruments;
however, certain of these financial instruments lack an available trading
market. Significant estimates, assumptions and present value calculations were
therefore used for the purposes of the following disclosure, resulting in a
great degree of subjectivity inherent in the indicated fair value amounts.
Because the fair value is estimated as of the balance sheet date, the amount
which will actually be realized or paid upon settlement or maturity could be
significantly different. Comparability among financial institutions may be
difficult due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques and the
numerous estimates and assumptions which must be made. The estimated fair values
of the Bank's financial instruments at September 30, 1998 and 1997 are as
follows:
<TABLE>
September 30,
-----------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997
------------------------ -------------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
(In thousands) Amount Value Amount Value
- -------------------------------------- ---------- ------------ -------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial assets:
Cash, due from banks,
interest-bearing deposits, federal
funds sold and securities purchased
under agreements to resell $1,216,456 $1,216,456 $ 651,891 $ 651,891
Loans held for sale 56,287 56,991 102,749 103,819
Loans held for securitization and sale 125,000 125,000 220,000 220,000
Trading securities 11,319 11,319 7,899 7,899
Investment securities 43,999 44,528 4,998 5,012
Mortgage-backed securities 2,025,817 2,014,819 1,985,707 1,984,667
Loans receivable, net 2,533,957 2,597,497 2,122,899 2,207,229
Other financial assets 272,997 274,719 516,849 515,387
Financial liabilities:
Deposit accounts with
no stated maturities 3,360,571 3,360,571 3,089,603 3,089,603
Deposit accounts with
stated maturities 1,527,659 1,521,752 1,804,153 1,810,245
Securities sold under repurchase
agreements and other short-term
borrowings, notes payable and
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 844,211 842,155 270,351 270,920
Capital notes-subordinated 241,417(1) 243,750 240,618(1) 256,875
Other financial liabilities 98,354 98,354 108,684 108,684
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(1) Net of deferred debt issuance costs which are included in other assets in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
<PAGE>
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value
amounts at September 30, 1998 and 1997:
Cash, due from banks, interest-bearing deposits, federal funds sold and
securities purchased under agreements to resell: Carrying amount approximates
fair value.
Loans held for sale: Fair value is determined using quoted prices for loans, or
securities backed by loans with similar characteristics, or outstanding
commitment prices from investors.
Loans held for securitization and sale: The carrying value of loans held for
securitization and sale approximates fair value because such receivables are
sold at face value.
Trading securities: Fair value is equal to carrying value.
Investment securities: Fair value is based on quoted market prices.
Mortgage-backed securities: Fair value is based on quoted market prices, dealer
quotes or estimates using dealer quoted market prices for similar securities.
Loans receivable, net: Fair value of certain homogeneous groups of loans (e.g.
single-family residential, automobile loans, home improvement loans and
fixed-rate commercial and multifamily loans) is estimated using discounted cash
flow analyses based on contractual repayment schedules. The discount rates used
in these analyses are based on either the interest rates paid on U.S. Treasury
securities of comparable maturities adjusted for credit risk and non-interest
operating costs, or the interest rates currently offered by the Bank for loans
with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. For loans which
reprice frequently at market rates (e.g. home equity, variable-rate commercial
and multifamily, real estate construction and ground loans), the carrying amount
approximates fair value. Because credit card receivables were generally sold at
face value through the Bank's securitization program, such face value was used
as the estimated fair value of these receivables at September 30, 1997. The fair
value of the Bank's loan portfolio as presented above does not include the value
of established credit line customer relationships, or the value relating to
estimated cash flows from future receivables and the associated fees generated
from existing customers.
Other financial assets: The carrying amount of Federal Home Loan Bank stock,
accrued interest receivable, interest-bearing deposits maintained pursuant to
various asset securitizations and other short-term receivables approximates fair
value. Interest-only strips are carried at fair value. The fair value of one of
the Bank's investments is based on quoted market prices. The fair value of the
Bank's interest-rate cap agreements is based on dealer quotes.
Deposit accounts with no stated maturities: Deposit liabilities payable on
demand, consisting of NOW accounts, money market deposits, statement savings and
other deposit accounts, are assumed to have an estimated fair value equal to
carrying value. The indicated fair value does not consider the value of the
Bank's established deposit customer relationships.
Deposit accounts with stated maturities: Fair value of fixed-rate certificates
of deposit is estimated based on discounted cash flow analyses using the
remaining maturity of the underlying accounts and interest rates currently
offered on certificates of deposit with similar maturities.
<PAGE>
Borrowings: These instruments consist of securities sold under repurchase
agreements and other short-term borrowings, notes payable and Federal Home Loan
Bank advances. For borrowings which either reprice frequently to market interest
rates or are short-term in duration, the carrying amount approximates fair
value. Fair value of the remaining amounts borrowed is estimated based on
discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently charged by the
lender for comparable borrowings with similar remaining maturities.
Capital notes-subordinated: Fair value of the 1993 Debentures and the 1996
Debentures is based on quoted market prices.
Other financial liabilities: The carrying amount of custodial accounts, amounts
due to banks, accrued interest payable and other short-term payables
approximates fair value.
Off-balance sheet instruments: The difference between the original fees charged
by the Bank for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit and the
current fees charged to enter into similar agreements is immaterial. Fair value
of forward commitments is based on the estimated amount that the Bank would pay
to terminate the arrangements at the reporting date, taking into account the
remaining terms of the arrangements and the counterparties' credit standing,
where applicable, which is immaterial.
30. LITIGATION - THE BANK
During the normal course of business, the Bank is involved in certain
litigation, including litigation arising out of the collection of loans, the
enforcement or defense of the priority of its security interests, the continued
development and marketing of certain of its real estate properties and certain
employment claims. Although the amounts claimed in some of these suits in which
the Bank is a defendant are material, the Bank denies liability and, in the
opinion of management, litigation which is currently pending will not have a
material impact on the financial condition or future operations of the Bank.
31. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - THE TRUST
The Trust is involved in a number of lawsuits arising from the normal course of
its business. On the basis of consultations with counsel, management does not
believe that any material loss will result from the resolution of these matters.
<PAGE>
32. INCOME TAXES - THE TRUST
The Trust voluntarily terminated its qualification as a real estate investment
trust under the Internal Revenue Code during fiscal 1978.
The provisions for income taxes for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and
1996, consist of the following:
<TABLE>
Year Ended September 30,
------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ---------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current provision (benefit):
Federal $ 94,828 $(1,800) $5,628
State 2,948 1,658 2,799
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
97,776 (142) 8,427
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
Deferred provision (benefit):
Federal (35,291) 16,113 (513)
State (19,616) (3,159) 386
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
(54,907) 12,954 (127)
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
Subtotal 42,869 12,812 8,300
Tax effect of other items:
Tax effect of extraordinary item (5,169) -- --
Tax effect of net unrealized holding gains
(losses) reported in stockholders' equity 361 904 809
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
Total $ 38,061 $ 13,716 $ 9,109
=================== =================== ===================
</TABLE>
The Trust's effective income tax rate varies from the statutory Federal income
tax rate as a result of the following factors:
<TABLE>
Year Ended September 30,
------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computed tax at statutory Federal income tax rate $ 58,077 $ 21,418 $7,003
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:
Minority interest (5,447) (4,524) --
Goodwill and other purchase accounting adjustments 389 699 1,626
Change in valuation allowance for deferred
tax asset allocated to income tax expense (7,074) 7,066 8,883
State income taxes (4,397) (7,953) (12,277)
Other 1,321 (3,894) 3,066
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
$ 42,869 $ 12,812 $ 8,301
=================== =================== ===================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The components of the net deferred tax asset were as follows:
<TABLE>
September 30,
--------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997
- ------------------------------------------------ --------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Provision for losses in excess of deductions $25,103 $44,571
Amortization of intangible 5,736 --
Unrealized losses on real estate owned 4,836 4,198
Property 7,211 7,211
State net operating losses 29,011 21,351
Amortization of servicing asset 3,718 --
Partnership investments 1,811 2,384
Asset securitization 26,184 --
Forgiveness of debt 3,483 3,928
Deferred loan fees 3,416 --
Depreciation 2,670 2,307
Compensation deferrals 4,371 --
Other 5,298 5,268
--------------------- ---------------------
Gross deferred tax assets 122,848 91,218
--------------------- ---------------------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Net unrealized holding gains on securities (2,467) (3,342)
available-for-sale
Deferred loan fees -- (541)
Asset securitizations -- (16,565)
Saul Holdings (4,509) (4,509)
Depreciation (712) (4,096)
FHLB stock dividends (3,288) (3,525)
Other (2,950) (3,879)
--------------------- ---------------------
Gross deferred tax liabilities (13,926) (36,457)
--------------------- ---------------------
Valuation allowance (17,623) (19,349)
--------------------- ---------------------
Net deferred tax asset $ 91,299 $ 35,412
===================== =====================
</TABLE>
A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some
portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. As of September 30,
1998, management has maintained a valuation allowance in part to reduce the net
deferred tax asset for net operating loss carryforwards related to state taxes.
Historically, the Bank has generated taxable income while the Real Estate Trust
has generated taxable losses. The net operating loss carryforwards are not
expected to be realizable for state tax purposes. For federal tax purposes,
there are no net operating loss carryforwards.
Management believes the existing net deductible temporary differences will
reverse during periods in which the Bank generates taxable income in excess of
Real Estate Trust taxable losses. Management believes that the positive
consolidated earnings will continue as a result of the Bank's earnings.
<PAGE>
TAX SHARING AGREEMENT
The Trust's affiliated group, including the Bank, entered into a tax sharing
agreement dated June 28, 1990. This agreement provides that payments be made by
members of the affiliated group to the Trust based on their respective allocable
shares of the overall federal income tax liability of the affiliated group for
taxable years and partial taxable years beginning on or after that date.
Allocable shares of the overall tax liability are prorated among the members
with taxable income calculated on a separate return basis. The agreement also
provides that, to the extent net operating losses or tax credits of a particular
member are used to reduce overall tax liability of the Trust's affiliated group,
such member will be reimbursed on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the other members
of the affiliated group that have taxable income in an amount equal to such tax
reduction. Under the tax sharing agreement, the Bank paid $5.6, $9.8 and $25.0
million, respectively, to the Trust during fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996.
In recent years, the operations of the Trust have generated net operating losses
while the Bank has reported net income. It is anticipated that the Trust's
consolidation of the Bank's operations into the Trust's federal income tax
return will result in the use of the Trust's net operating losses to reduce the
federal income taxes the Bank would otherwise owe. If in any future year, the
Bank has taxable losses or unused credits, the Trust would be obligated to
reimburse the Bank for the greater of (i) the tax benefit to the group using
such tax losses or unused tax credits in the group's consolidated Federal income
tax returns or (ii) the amount of tax refund which the Bank would otherwise have
been able to claim if it were not being included in the consolidated Federal
income tax return of the group.
As of September 30, 1998, there was no alternative minimum tax carryforward.
33. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - THE TRUST
In June 1990, the Trust acquired from affiliated companies an additional equity
interest in the Bank, which raised the Trust's ownership share of the Bank to
80%. In exchange for the interest acquired, the Trust issued 450,000 shares of a
new class of $10.50 cumulative preferred shares of beneficial interest with a
par value of $1 ("preferred shares"). The transaction has been accounted for at
historical cost in a manner similar to the pooling of interests method because
the entities are considered to be under common control. In addition, the Trust
acquired two real estate properties from an affiliate in exchange for 66,000
preferred shares.
At September 30, 1998, 1997, and 1996, the amount of dividends in arrears on the
preferred shares was $34.0 million ($65.98 per share), $36.2 million ($70.21 per
share) and $31.6 million ($61.17 per share), respectively. Based on the
dividends paid on the preferred shares during fiscal 1996, the Trust recorded a
liability at September 30, 1996, equal to the total dividends in arrears on that
date. The Trust paid preferred dividends of $7.6 million, $750,000 and $500,000
in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
<PAGE>
34. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) - THE TRUST
<TABLE>
Year Ended September 30, 1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts) December March June September
- ---------------------------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real Estate Trust:
Total income $ 21,749 $ 22,167 $ 28,833 $ 25,843
Operating loss (7,430) (5,542) (1,975) (3,510)
The Bank:
Interest income 106,395 106,774 109,795 112,843
Interest expense 58,292 55,180 61,606 63,332
Provision for loan losses (35,062) (16,612) (28,298) (70,857)
Other income 129,369 95,820 87,530 329,138
Operating income (loss) 29,433 12,474 (17,624) 160,124
Total Company:
Operating income (loss) 22,003 6,932 (19,599) 156,614
Income (loss) before minority interest 16,156 (3,086) (9,528) 119,539
Net income (loss) 6,856 (10,153) (13,299) 82,720
Net income (loss) per common share 1.14 (2.38) (3.04) 16.86
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Year Ended September 30, 1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts) December March June September
- ---------------------------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real Estate Trust:
Total income $ 19,020 $ 18,653 $ 23,448 $ 23,448
Operating loss (7,092) (6,762) (2,167) (2,966)
The Bank:
Interest income 115,271 123,286 120,748 91,175
Interest expense 57,544 61,911 61,246 59,114
Provision for loan losses (26,840) (26,922) (36,129) (35,224)
Other income 87,611 88,096 90,158 147,112
Operating income (loss) 19,958 20,126 10,672 29,425
Total Company:
Operating income 12,866 13,364 8,505 26,459
Income (loss) before minority interest 7,735 10,333 3,444 26,872
Net income (loss) 2,303 2,743 (3,079) 16,893
Net income (loss) per common share 0.20 0.29 (0.91) 3.20
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
35. INDUSTRY SEGMENT INFORMATION - TRUST
Industry segment information with regard to the Real Estate Trust is presented
below. For information regarding the Bank, please refer to the "Banking"
sections of the accompanying financial statements.
<TABLE>
Year Ended September 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
INCOME
Hotels $ 71,424 $ 59,464 $ 54,245
Office and industrial properties 22,883 21,097 17,590
Other 4,285 4,008 5,004
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
$ 98,592 $ 84,569 $ 76,839
====================== ====================== ======================
OPERATING PROFIT (LOSS)
Hotels $ 19,175 $ 14,755 $ 12,635
Office and industrial properties 10,865 9,020 5,893
Other 4,546 6,429 6,702
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
34,586 30,204 25,230
Gain (loss) on sales of property (331) 895 (68)
Interest and debt expense (42,817) (40,819) (40,514)
Advisory fee, management and leasing fees - related parties (8,742) (7,995) (7,423)
General and administrative (1,153) (1,272) (1,401)
====================== ====================== ======================
Operating loss $ (18,457) $(18,987) $(24,176)
====================== ====================== ======================
IDENTIFIABLE ASSETS (AT YEAR END)
Hotels $119,258 $ 86,815 $ 84,255
Office and industrial properties 75,332 78,063 78,388
Other 129,291 135,695 131,860
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
$323,881 $300,573 $294,503
====================== ====================== ======================
DEPRECIATION
Hotels $6,733 $6,186 $5,535
Office and industrial properties 4,387 4,311 4,446
Other 50 46 39
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
$ 11,170 $ 10,543 $ 10,020
====================== ====================== ======================
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Hotels $ 39,539 $8,462 $4,769
Office and industrial properties 6,389 5,288 2,444
Other 537 1,079 195
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
$ 46,465 $ 14,829 $7,408
====================== ====================== ======================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
36. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - THE TRUST
These condensed financial statements reflect the Real Estate Trust and all its
consolidated subsidiaries except for the Bank which has been reflected on the
equity method.
<TABLE>
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30,
----------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997
- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Income-producing properties $279,951 $242,450
Accumulated depreciation (96,072) (85,915)
----------------------- -----------------------
183,879 156,535
Land parcels 40,110 42,160
Construction in progress 8,694 2,480
Equity investment in bank 288,965 205,552
Cash and cash equivalents 13,950 18,248
Other assets 76,799 81,150
----------------------- -----------------------
TOTAL ASSETS $612,397 $506,125
======================= =======================
LIABILITIES
Mortgage notes payable $198,874 $180,204
Notes payable - secured 200,000 175,000
Notes payable - unsecured 50,335 46,633
Deferred gains - real estate 112,883 112,883
Accrued dividends payable - preferred
shares of beneficial interest 34,049 36,231
Other liabilities and accrued expenses 39,895 39,959
----------------------- -----------------------
Total liabilities 636,036 590,910
----------------------- -----------------------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT* (23,639) (84,785)
======================= =======================
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT $612,397 $506,125
======================= =======================
* See Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Deficit
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended September 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total income $ 98,592 $ 84,569 $ 76,839
Total expenses (118,636) (108,601) (104,321)
Equity in earnings of partnership investments 1,918 4,150 3,374
Gain (loss) on sales of property (331) 895 (68)
---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------
Real estate operating loss (18,457) (18,987) (24,176)
Equity in earnings of bank 88,172 27,391 15,846
---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------
Total company operating income (loss) 69,715 8,404 (8,330)
Income tax benefit (6,010) (10,456) (8,252)
---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------
Income (loss) before extraordinary item 75,725 18,860 (78)
Extraordinary item: loss on early extinguishment of debt (9,601) -- --
---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------
TOTAL COMPANY NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 66,124 $ 18,860 $ (78)
====================== ======================= ======================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended September 30
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) 1998 1997 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss) $ 66,124 $ 18,860 $ (78)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Depreciation 11,170 10,543 10,020
Loss (gain) on sales of property 328 (895) 68
Early extinguishment of debt, net of taxes 9,601 -- --
Equity in earnings of bank (88,172) (27,391) (15,846)
(Increase) decrease in deferred tax asset 954 (3,252) (192)
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable and accrued income (1,229) 17 (4,869)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 2,708 1,058 430
(Increase) decrease in tax sharing receivable (6,545) 2,492 16,606
Other 19,799 5,479 2,893
---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 14,738 6,911 9,032
---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures - properties (19,815) (10,120) (7,408)
Property acquisitions (26,650) (4,709) --
Property sales -- 1,399 1,812
Equity investment in unconsolidated entities 1,348 1,723 639
Other investing activities 2 43 50
---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
Net cash used in investing activities (45,115) (11,664) (4,907)
---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from long-term debt 296,316 32,894 6,208
Repayments of long-term debt (245,287) (24,033) (11,471)
Costs of obtaining financings (7,295) (626) (201)
Loan prepayment fees (10,055) -- --
Dividends paid (7,600) (750) (500)
---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 26,079 7,485 (5,964)
---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (4,298) 2,732 (1,839)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 18,248 15,516 17,355
---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 13,950 $ 18,248 $ 15,516
====================== ======================= =====================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S STATEMENT ON RESPONSIBILITY
The Consolidated Financial Statements and related financial information in this
report have been prepared by the Advisor in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles appropriate in the circumstances, based on best
estimates and judgments, with consideration given to materiality.
The Trust maintains a system of internal accounting control supported by
documentation to provide reasonable assurance that the books and records reflect
authorized transactions of the Trust, and that the assets of the Trust are
safeguarded.
The Board of Trustees exercises its responsibility for the Trust's financial
statements through its Audit Committee, which is composed of two outside
Trustees who meet periodically with the Trust's independent accountants and
management. The committee considers the audit scope, discusses financial and
reporting subjects, and reviews management actions on these matters. The
independent accountants have full access to the Audit Committee.
The independent accountants are recommended by the Audit Committee and confirmed
by the Board of Trustees. They provide an objective assessment of the fairness
and accuracy of the financial statements, consider the adequacy of the system of
internal accounting controls, and perform such tests and other procedures as
they deem necessary to express an opinion on the fairness of the financial
statements. Management believes that the policies and procedures it has
established provide reasonable assurance that its operations are conducted in
conformity with law and a high standard of business conduct.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
<PAGE>
PART III
ITEM 10. TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE TRUST
The Declaration of Trust provides that there shall be no fewer than three nor
more than twelve Trustees, as determined from time to time by the Trustees in
office. The Board of Trustees has fixed its permanent membership at six Trustees
divided into three classes with overlapping three-year terms. The term of each
class expires at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is usually held on
the last Friday of January.
The following list sets forth the name, age, position with the Trust, present
principal occupation or employment and material occupations, positions, offices
or employments during the past five years of each Trustee and executive officer
of the Trust. Unless otherwise indicated, each individual has held an office
with the Trust for at least the past five years.
Class Three Trustees -- Terms End at 1999 Annual Meeting
Garland J. Bloom, Jr., age 67, has served as a Trustee since 1964. He is
currently a real estate consultant. He was formerly Executive Vice President and
Principal of GMB Associates, Inc., a real state finance and management firm,
from 1988 to 1990 and Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of
Smithy-Braedon Company, a real estate finance and management firm, from 1985 to
1987.
John R. Whitmore, age 65, has served as a Trustee since 1984. He also serves as
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Bessemer Group,
Incorporated, a financial management and banking firm, and its Bessemer Trust
Company subsidiaries with which he has been an associated since 1975, and as a
Director of Bessemer Securities Corporation, Chevy Chase Property Company, B. F.
Saul Company and Saul Centers, Inc.
Class One Trustees -- Terms End at 2000 Annual Meeting
Gilbert M. Grosvenor, age 67, has served as a Trustee since 1971. He also serves
as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the National Geographic Society and as a
Director of the bank, Saul Centers, Inc., Marriott International Corp., and
Ethyl Corporation.
B. Francis Saul II, age 66, has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Trust since 1969 and as a Trustee since 1964. He also serves as President
and Chairman of the Board of Directors of B. F. Saul Company, B. F. Saul
Advisory Company, Chevy Chase Property Company, Westminster Investing
Corporation, and Chevy Chase Lake Corporation, as Chairman of the Board of the
bank, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Saul Centers,
Inc., and as a Trustee of the National Geographic Society and the Brookings
Institute. Mr. Saul is the father of B. Francis Saul III.
Class Two Trustees -- Terms End at 2001 Annual Meeting
George M. Rogers, Jr., age 65, has served as a Trustee since 1969. His
professional corporation is a partner in the law firm of Shaw, Pittman, Potts &
Trowbridge, Washington, D.C., which serves as counsel to the Trust and the bank.
Mr. Rogers serves as a Director of the bank, B. F. Saul Company, Chevy Chase
Property Company, Westminster Investing Corporation, and Chevy Chase Lake
Corporation.
B. Francis Saul III, age 36, was elected a Trustee and Vice President of the
Trust in 1997. He also serves as a Director and/or Officer of the bank, B. F.
Saul Company, B. F. Saul Advisory Company, Franklin Property Company, Chevy
Chase Property Company, Westminster Investing Corporation, and Saul Centers,
Inc. He is also a Director of the Greater Washington Boys and Girls Club and The
Heights School. Mr. Saul is the son of B. Francis Saul II.
Executive Officers of the Trust Who Are Not Directors
Philip D. Caraci, age 60, serves as Senior Vice President and Secretary of the
Trust, Executive Vice President of B.F. Saul Company, Senior Vice President of
B. F. Saul Advisory Company, President of Franklin Property Company and a
Director and President of Saul Centers, Inc.
Stephen R. Halpin, Jr., age 43, serves as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Trust. He also serves as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the bank.
Ross E. Heasley, age 59, serves as Vice President of the Trust, B. F. Saul
Company, B. F. Saul Advisory Company, Franklin Property Company and Saul
Centers, Inc.
Henry Ravenel, Jr., age 64, serves as Vice President of the Trust, B. F. Saul
Company, B. F. Saul Advisory Company and Saul Centers, Inc.
William K. Albright, age 67, serves as Vice President and Treasurer of the
Trust, B. F. Saul Company, Franklin Property Company and B. F. Saul Advisory
Company, and as Vice President of Saul Centers, Inc.
Committees of the Board of Trustees
The Board of Trustees met four times during fiscal 1998. Each member of the
Board attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and
of the Committees of the Board on which he served.
The Board of Trustees has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the
Executive Committee and the Nominating Committee. The Audit Committee is
composed of Messrs. Bloom and Grosvenor. Its duties include nominating the
Trust's independent auditors, discussing with them the scope of their
examination of the Trust, reviewing with them the Trust's financial statements
and accompanying report, and reviewing their recommendations regarding internal
controls and related matters. This committee met four times during fiscal 1998.
The Executive Committee is composed of Messrs. Rogers, Saul II and Whitmore. It
is empowered to oversee day-to-day actions of the Advisor and Franklin Property
Company in connection with the operations of the Trust, including the
acquisition, administration, sale or disposition of investments. This committee
did not meet during fiscal 1998.
The Nominating Committee is composed of Messrs. Rogers and Whitmore. Its
function is to screen and make recommendations to the Board of Trustees
regarding potential candidates for membership on the Board and to perform such
other duties as may be assigned to it from time to time. This committee did not
meet during fiscal 1998.
Trustees of the Trust are currently paid an annual retainer of $12,500 and a fee
of $600 for each Board or committee meeting attended. Trustees from outside the
Washington, D.C. area are also reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in
connection with their attendance at meetings. Mr. Saul II is not paid for
attending Executive Committee meetings. For the fiscal year ended September 30,
1998, the Real Estate Trust paid total fees of $94,000 to the Trustees,
including $15,000 to Mr. Saul II.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Trust pays no compensation to its executive officers for their services in
such capacity. Mr. Saul II receives compensation from the bank for his services
as the bank's Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer,
and Mr. Halpin receives compensation from the bank for his services as Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. No other executive officers of the
Trust received any compensation from the Trust or its subsidiaries with respect
to any of the fiscal years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 or 1996.
The following table set forth the cash compensation paid by the bank to Mr. Saul
and Mr. Halpin for or with respect to the fiscal years ended September 30, 1998,
1997 and 1996 for all capacities in which they served during such fiscal years.
<PAGE>
Summary Compensation Table
Annual Compensation
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name and Principal Other Annual All Other
Position Fiscal Salary Bonus Compensation Compensation
- --------------------- ------ ------------ --------- ------------ ------------
B. Francis Saul II 1998 $1,353,528 $700,000 $ -- $725,873 (1)
Chairman and Chief 1997 1,230,440 600,000 -- 292,807 (2)
Executive Officer 1996 1,015,054 500,000 -- 214,426 (3)
Stephen R. Halpin, Jr. 1998 $400,010 $60,000 $ -- $159,073 (1)
Vice President and 1997 375,402 54,000 -- 69,167 (2)
Chief Financial 1996 332,320 58,000 -- 50,295 (3)
Officer
- ---------------------
(1) The total amounts shown in the "All Other Compensation" column for fiscal
1998 consist of the following: (a) contributions made by the bank's Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan on behalf of Mr. Saul in the amount of $136,018 and
Mr. Halpin in the amount of $20,170; (b) the taxable benefit of premiums paid by
the bank for group term insurance on behalf of Mr. Saul in the amount of $14,724
and Mr. Halpin in the amount of $2,621; (c) contributions to the Retirement
Plan, a defined contribution plan, on behalf of Mr. Halpin in the amount of
$9,600; and (d) accrued earnings on awards previously made under the bank's
Deferred Compensation Plan on behalf of Mr. Saul in the amount of $575,131 and
Mr. Halpin in the amount of $126,682.
(2) The total amounts shown in the "All Other Compensation" column for fiscal
1997 consist of the following: (a) contributions made by the bank to the bank's
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan on behalf of Mr. Saul in the amount of
$109,616 and Mr. Halpin in the amount of $16,164; (b) the taxable benefit of
premiums paid by the bank for group term insurance on behalf Mr. Halpin in the
amount of $2,325; (c) contributions to the Retirement Plan, a defined
contribution plan, on behalf of Mr. Halpin in the amount of $9,600; and (d)
accrued earnings on awards previously made under the bank's Deferred
Compensation Plan on behalf of Mr. Saul in the amount of $183,191 and Mr. Halpin
in the amount of $41,078.
(3) The total amounts shown in the "All Other Compensation" column for fiscal
1996 consist of: (a) the contributions made by the bank to the bank's
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan on behalf of Mr. Saul in the amount of
$90,693 and Mr. Halpin in the amount of $14,373; (b) the taxable benefit of
premiums paid by the bank for group term insurance on behalf of Mr. Halpin in
the amount of $2,102; (c) contributions to the Retirement Plan, a defined
contribution plan, on behalf of Mr. Halpin in the amount of $9,000; and (d)
accrued earnings on awards previously made under the bank's Deferred
Compensation Plan on behalf of Mr. Saul in the amount of $123,733 and Mr. Halpin
in the amount of $24,820.
<PAGE>
Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards. The following table sets forth certain
information concerning the principal contributions credited by the bank to the
accounts of the executive officers of the bank named above for fiscal 1998 under
the bank's Deferred Compensation Plan.
Long-Term Incentive Program - Awards in Last Fiscal Year
Number Performance
of Shares Or Other Estimated Future Payouts Under
Units Period Until Non-Stock Price-Based Plans
Name and Principal Or Other Maturation -------------------------------
Position Rights(1) Or Payout Threshold Target(2) Maximum
- ------------------------ --------- ------------ --------- --------- ----------
B. Francis Saul II(3)(4) N/A 2002 $550,000 $694,362 $1,140,480
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.(4) N/A 2008 $120,000 $214,902 $743,008
Vice President and
Chief Financial
Officer
- ------------------------
(1) The estimated future payouts shown in the table are based on assumed
performance rates for the bank each year in the ten-year performance period. The
actual payouts under the plan may vary substantially from the payouts shown in
the table, depending upon the bank's actual rate of return on average assets for
each fiscal year in the ten-year performance period ending September 30, 2008.
(2) The plan does not establish any target performance levels. The payout
amounts shown in this column have calculated assuming that the bank's rate of
return on average assets during each of the years in the performance period are
the same as the bank's rate of return during the fiscal year ended September 30,
1997.
(3) The payout amount shown for Mr. Saul is the estimated amount that would be
payable to Mr. Saul if he continued with the bank for the entire ten-year
performance period of the plan. Mr. Saul will attain the age of 70 in 2002 at
which time he will become fully vested in the account maintained for his benefit
under the plan. Under the plan, if Mr. Saul were to retire after that date, he
could elect to have the bank pay out the net contribution, as defined, in his
account prior to the year 2008. Certain of the awards credited by the bank to
the account maintained for the benefit of Mr. Saul under the plan vested at the
time Mr. Saul attained age 60 in 1992. Certain other awards credited by the bank
to the account maintained for the benefit of Mr. Saul will vest upon the earlier
of: (a) five years after the date of the award; (b) his attainment of age 70 in
2002;, (c) his death; (d) his total or permanent disability; or (e) a change in
control of the bank, as defined in the plan. Accordingly, as of September 30,
1998, Mr. Saul was partially vested in the account maintained for his benefit
under the plan. As of that date, the vested Account balance maintained for Mr.
Saul's benefit under the plan was $779,446.
(4) As of September 30, 1998 the following individuals have vested accounts that
are payable within 120 days after September 30, 1998; Mr. Saul in the amount of
$303,710; and Mr. Halpin in the amount of $65,081.
The plan provides that, as of the end of each fiscal year in the ten-year period
ending September 30, 2008 or the executive officer's earlier termination of
employment with the bank, the bank will add to or deduct from each executive
officer's account a contribution or deduction, as the case may be, which
represents, the hypothetical interest, which may be positive or negative, earned
on the principal contribution, based on the bank's rate of return on average
assets, as computed under the plan, for the fiscal year then ended. The
principal contribution, plus or minus any interest credited or deducted, is
referred to as the "net contribution").
Executive officers are entitled to receive the net contribution in their
respective account only upon full or partial vesting. Plan participants become
fully vested in their account under the plan, provided that they remain
continuously employed by the bank during the vesting period, upon the earliest
to occur of any of the following: (a) September 30, 2008; (b) attainment of age
60; (c) death; (d) total and permanent disability; or (e) a change in control of
the bank, as defined in the plan. Plan participants become partially vested to
the extent of 50% of the net contribution in the account, upon the termination
of their employment by the bank without cause, as defined in the plan, after
September 30, 2003.
Payouts are made under the plan within 120 days after September 30, 2008, or the
earlier termination of the executive officer's employment with the bank,
provided that vesting or partial vesting has occurred under the plan.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 4, 1998,
concerning beneficial ownership of Common Shares and Preferred Shares of
beneficial interest by: (a) each person known by the Trust to be the beneficial
owner of more than 5% of the Common Shares and the Preferred Shares, (b) each
member of the Board of Trustees; (c) each executive officer of the Trust named
in the Summary Compensation Table under "Executive Compensation;" and (d) all
Trustees and executive officers of the Trust as a group.
<PAGE>
Aggregate Number of Percent
Name of Shares of
Beneficial Owner Beneficially Owned (1) Class (1)
- ----------------------- ---------------------- ------------------
B. Francis Saul II Preferred:
516,000 (2) 100.00%
Common:
4,807,510 (3) 99.60%
Philip D. Caraci Common:
19,400 (4) 0.40%
All Trustees and Preferred:
executive officers 516,000 (2) 100.00%
as a group (10 persons) Common:
4,826,910 100.00%
- -----------------------
(1) Beneficial owner and percent of class are calculated pursuant to rule 13d-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(2) Consists of Preferred Shares owned of record by B. F. Saul Company and other
companies of which Mr. Saul is an officer, director and/or more than 10%
shareholder, comprising 270,000 Preferred Shares owned by B. F. Saul Company,
90,000 Preferred Shares owned by Franklin Development Company, Inc., 90,000
Preferred Shares owned by The Klingle Corporation, and 66,000 Preferred Shares
owned by Westminster Investing Corporation. The address of each person listed in
this footnote is 8401 Connecticut Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815. Pursuant
to Rule 13d-3, the Preferred Shares described above are considered to be
beneficially owned by Mr. Saul because he has or may be deemed to have sole or
shared voting and/or investment power in respect thereof.
(3) Consists of Common Shares owned of record by B. F. Saul Company and other
companies of which Mr. Saul is an officer and director and/or more than 10%
shareholder, comprising 1,125,739 Common Shares owned by Westminster Investing
Corporation, 43,673 Common Shares owned by Derwood Investment Corporation, a
subsidiary of Westminster Investing Corporation, 34,400 Common Shares owned by
Somerset Investment Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Westminster Investing
Corporation, 2,545,362 Common Shares owned by B. F. Saul Company, 206,300 Common
Shares owned by Columbia Credit Company, a subsidiary of B. F. Saul Company,
283,400 Common Shares owned by Columbia Securities Company of Washington, D. C.,
172,918 Common Shares owned by Franklin Development Company, Inc., and 395,718
Common Shares owned by The Klingle Corporation. The address of each person
listed in this footnote is 8401 Connecticut Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.
Pursuant to Rule 13d-3, the Common Shares described above are considered to be
beneficially owned by Mr. Saul because he has or may be deemed to have sole or
shared voting and/or investment power in respect thereof.
(4) Mr. Caraci has entered into an agreement with the Trust under which he is
required to sell all Common Shares he then owns to the Trust when his employment
by B. F. Saul Company and any of its affiliates ceases for any reason, including
retirement, termination, death or disability. The price Mr. Caraci will receive
for his Common Shares will be the greater of $28.00 per Share or the price the
Trust determines at the time is the fair market value thereof.
The Preferred Shares were issued in June 1990 in connection with the transaction
in which the Trust increased its equity interest in the bank from 60% to 80%.
The dividend rate on the Preferred Shares is $10.50 per share per annum.
Dividends are cumulative and are payable annually or at such other times as the
Trustees may determine, as and when declared by the Trustees out of any assets
legally available therefor. The Preferred Shares have a liquidation preference
of $100 per share. Subject to limits in certain of the Trust's loan agreements,
the Preferred Shares are subject to redemption at the option of the Trust at a
redemption price equal to their liquidation preference. Except as otherwise
required by applicable law, the holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to vote
only in certain limited situations, such as the merger of the Trust or a sale of
all or substantially all of the assets of the Trust.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Real Estate
Transactions with B. F. Saul Company and its Subsidiaries. The Real Estate Trust
is managed by the Advisor, a wholly owned subsidiary of B. F. Saul Company. All
of the officers of the Trust and B. Francis Saul II, George M. Rogers, Jr., B.
Francis Saul III and John R. Whitmore, each of whom is a Trustee of the Trust,
are also officers and/or directors of B. F. Saul Company and/or its subsidiary
corporations. The Advisor is paid a fixed monthly fee subject to annual review
by the Trustees. The monthly fee was $301,000 for the period October 1995
through March 1996, $306,000 for the period April 1996 through September 1996,
$311,000 for the period October 1996 through September 1997, and $317,000 for
the period October 1997 through September 1998. The advisory contract has been
extended until September 30, 1999, and will continue thereafter unless cancelled
by either party at the end of any contract year. Certain loan agreements
prohibit termination of this contract.
B. F. Saul Company and Franklin, a wholly owned subsidiary of B. F. Saul
Company, provide services to the Real Estate Trust in the areas of commercial
property management and leasing, hotel management, development and construction
management, and acquisitions, sales and financings of real property. The fee
schedules of B. F. Saul Company and Franklin are reviewed and approved by the
Trustees. Fees to B. F. Saul Company and Franklin amounted to $5.2 million in
fiscal 1998.
The Real Estate Trust reimburses the Advisor and Franklin for costs and expenses
incurred in connection with the acquisition and development of real property on
behalf of the Real Estate Trust, in-house legal expenses, and all travel
expenses incurred in connection with the affairs of the Real Estate Trust.
The Real Estate Trust pays the Advisor fees equal to 1% of the principal amount
of publicly offered Unsecured Notes as they are issued to offset the Advisor's
costs of administering the program. The Advisor received $113,000 in such fees
in fiscal 1998.
B. F. Saul Insurance Agency of Maryland, Inc., a subsidiary of B. F. Saul
Company, is a general insurance agency that receives commissions and
counter-signature fees in connection with the Real Estate Trust's insurance
program. Such commissions and fees amounted to approximately $157,000 in fiscal
1998.
In fiscal 1994, the Real Estate Trust made an unsecured loan to B. F. Saul
Company of $15.0 million at a floating interest rate and due on demand. In
fiscal 1995 the loan balance was reduced to $12.7 million. In fiscal 1996 the
Real Estate Trust made loans aggregating $3.5 million to B. F. Saul Company.
During fiscal 1997 and 1998, curtails of $750,000 and $141,000, were paid by the
Saul Company. At September 30, 1998 the total due the Real Estate Trust was
$15.3 million in principal and $1.7 million in deferred interest. Interest
accrued on these loans amounted to $1.3 million, $1.4 million and $1.4 million
during fiscal years 1998, 1997 and 1996.
Remuneration of Trustees and Officers. For fiscal 1998, the Real Estate Trust
paid the Trustees $94,000 in fees for their services. See "Trustees and
Executive Officers of the Trust." No compensation was paid to the officers of
the Real Estate Trust for acting as such; however, Mr. Saul II was paid by the
bank for his services as the bank's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Mr.
Halpin was paid by the bank for his services as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the bank. See "Executive Compensation." Messrs.
Grosvenor, Rogers, Saul II and Saul III receive compensation for their services
as directors of the bank and Messrs. Rogers, Saul II, Saul III and Whitmore and
all of the officers of the Real Estate Trust receive compensation from B. F.
Saul Company and/or its affiliated corporations as directors or officers
thereof.
Legal Services. For legal services to the Real Estate Trust and its
subsidiaries, the law firm in which the professional corporation of George M.
Rogers, Jr., a Trustee of the Trust, is a partner received approximately
$800,000 in fiscal 1998, excluding expense reimbursements.
Other Transactions. The Real Estate Trust leases space to the bank and Franklin
at one of its income-producing properties. Amounts paid under these leases
amounted to approximately $251,000 in fiscal 1998.
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements
The following consolidated Financial Statements of the Trust are
incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.
(a) Report of Independent Public Accountants.
(b) Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of September 30, 1998 and 1997.
(c) Consolidated Statements of Operations - For the years ended
September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
(d) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Deficit - For the years
ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
(e) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - For the years ended
September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
(f) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. Financial Statement Schedules and Supplementary Data
(a) Selected Quarterly Financial Data for the Real Estate Trust
are incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.
(b) Report of Independent Public Accountants on Financial Statement
Schedules.
(c) Schedules of the Real Estate Trust:
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information - For the years
ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
Schedule III - Consolidated Schedule of Investment Properties
As of September 30, 1998.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
Form 8-K filed September 9, 1998 reporting Items 2 and 7.
(c) Exhibits
<PAGE>
EXHIBITS DESCRIPTION
- -------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
3. ORGANIZATIONAL DOCUMENTS
(a) Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust filed with the Maryland
State Department of Assessments and Taxation on June 22, 1990 as
filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
(b) Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust reflected
in Secretary Certificate filed with the Maryland State Department
of Assessments and Taxation on June 26, 1990 as filed as Exhibit
3(b) to Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(c) Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Trust dated as of February
28, 1991 as filed as Exhibit T3B to the Trust's Form T-3
Application for Qualification of Indentures under the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939 (File No. 22-20838) is hereby incorporated
by reference.
4. INSTRUMENTS DEFINING THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS, INCLUDING
INDENTURES
(a) Indenture dated as of March 25, 1998 between the Trust and
Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, with
respect to the Trust's 9 3/4% Series B Senior Secured Notes due
2008, as filed as Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement
333-49937 is hereby incorporated by reference.
(b) Indenture with respect to the Trust's Senior Notes Due from One
Year to Ten Years from Date of Issue as filed as Exhibit 4(a) to
Registration No. 33-19909 is hereby incorporated by reference.
(c) First Supplemental Indenture with respect to the Trust's Senior
Notes due from One Year to Ten Years from Date of Issue as filed
as Exhibit T-3C to the Trust's Form T-3 Application for
Qualification of Indentures under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939
(File No. 22-20838) is hereby incorporated by reference.
(d) Indenture with respect to the Trust's Senior Notes due from One
Year to Ten Years from Date of Issue as filed as Exhibit 4(a) to
Registration Statement No. 33-9336 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
(e) Fourth Supplemental Indenture with respect to the Trust's Senior
Notes due from One Year to Ten Years from Date of Issue as filed
as Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement No. 2-95506 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(f) Third Supplemental Indenture with respect to the Trust's Senior
Notes due from One Year to Ten Years from Date of Issue as filed
as Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement No. 2-91126 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(g) Second Supplemental Indenture with respect to the Trust's Senior
Notes due from One Year to Ten Years from Date of Issue as filed
as Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement No. 2-80831 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(h) Supplemental Indenture with respect to the Trust's Senior Notes
due from One Year to Ten Years from Date of Issue as filed as
Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement No. 2-68652 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(i) Indenture with respect to the Trust's Senior Notes due from One
Year to Five Years from Date of Issue as filed as Exhibit T-3C to
the Trust's Form T-3 Application for Qualification of Indentures
under
<PAGE>
EXHIBITS DESCRIPTION
- -------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (file No. 22-10206) is hereby
incorporated by reference
(j) Indenture dated as of September 1, 1992 with respect to the
Trust's Notes due from One to Ten Years form Date of Issue filed
as Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(k) First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 16, 1997 with
respect to the Trust's Notes due from One to Ten years from Date
of Issue filed as Exhibit 4(b) to Registration Statement No.
33-34930 is hereby incorporated by reference.
10. MATERIAL CONTRACTS
(a) Advisory Contract with B.F. Saul Advisory Company effective
October 1, 1982 filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Registration Statement
No. 2-80831 is hereby incorporated by reference.
(b) Commercial Property Leasing and Management Agreement effective
October 1, 1982 between the Trust and Franklin Property Company
filed as Exhibit 10(b) to Registration Statement No. 2-80831 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
(c) Tax sharing Agreement dated June 28,1990 among the Trust, Chevy
Chase Savings Bank F.S.B. and certain of their subsidiaries filed
as Exhibit 10(c) to Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(d) Agreement dated June 28, 1990 among the Trust B.F. Saul Company,
Franklin Development Co., Inc., The Klingle Corporation and
Westminster Investing Corporation relating to the transfer of
certain shares of Chevy Chase Savings Bank, F.S.B. and certain
real property to the Trust in exchange for preferred shares of
beneficial interest of the Trust filed as Exhibit 10(d) to
Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
(e) Regulatory Capital Maintenance/Dividend Agreement dated May 17,
1988 among B.F. Saul Company, the Trust and the Federal Savings
and Loan Insurance Corporation filed as Exhibit 10(e) to the
Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-7184) for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1991 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
(f) Written Agreement dated September 30, 1991 between the Office of
Thrift Supervision and Chevy Chase Savings Bank, F.S.B. filed as
Exhibit 10(f) to Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(g) Amendments to Commercial Property Leasing and Management
Agreement between the Trust and Franklin Property Company dated
as of December 31, 1992 (Amendment No. 5), July 1, 1989
(Amendment No. 4), October 1, 1986 (Amendment No. 3), January 1,
1985 (Amendment No. 2) and July 1, 1984 (Amendment No. 1) filed
as Exhibit 10(o) to Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
(h) Advisory Contract between B.F. Saul Advisory Company and Dearborn
Corporation dated as of December 31, 1992 filed as Exhibit 10(p)
to Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
(i) Commercial Property Leasing and Management Agreement between
Dearborn Corporation and Franklin Property Company dated as of
December 31, 1992 filed as Exhibit 10(q) to Registration
Statement No. 33-34930 is hereby incorporated by reference.
<PAGE>
EXHIBITS DESCRIPTION
- -------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
(j) Registration Rights and Lock-Up Agreement dated August 26, 1993
by and among Saul Centers, Inc. and the Trust, Westminster
Investing Corporation, Van Ness Square Corporation, Dearborn
Corporation, Franklin Property Company and Avenel Executive Park
Phase II, Inc. as filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Registration Statement
No. 33-64562 is hereby incorporated by reference.
(k) Exclusivity and Right of First Refusal Agreement dated August 26,
1993 among Saul Centers, Inc., the Trust, B. F. Saul Company,
Westminster Investing Corporation, Franklin Property Company, Van
Ness Square Corporation, and Chevy Chase Savings Bank, F.S.B. as
filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Registration Statement No. 33-64562 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
(l) First Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement dated as of
August 1, 1994 by and among Saul Centers, Inc., Saul Holdings
Limited Partnership, Saul Subsidiary I limited Partnership, Saul
Subsidiary II Limited Partnership, Avenel Executive Park Phase
II, Inc., Franklin Property Company, Westminster Investing
Corporation, Van Ness Square Corporation, Dearborn Corporation
and the Trust filed as Exhibit 10(l) to the Trust's Annual Report
on Form 10-K (File No. 1-7184) for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1995 is hereby incorporated by reference.
(m) Amendment to Written Agreement dated October 29, 1993 between the
Office of Thrift Supervision and Chevy Chase Savings Bank, F.S.B.
filed as Exhibit 10(u) to Registration Statement No. 33-34930 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
(n) Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 25, 1998 among
the Trust, Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated and Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc. as
filed as Exhibit 4(c) to Registration Statement No. 333-49937 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
(o) Bank Stock Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 25,
1998 between the Trust and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National
Association, as Trustee, as filed as Exhibit 4(d) to Registration
Statement No. 333-49937 is hereby incorporated by reference.
21. List of Subsidiaries of the Trust.
27. Financial Data Schedule.
- ---------------------
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
To the Trustees and Shareholders of
B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of B.F. Saul Real Estate
Investment Trust (the "Trust") as of September 30, 1998 and 1997 and for the
years then ended in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and
have issued our report thereon dated December 2, 1998. Our audit was made for
the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a
whole. The schedules listed in Item 14 are the responsibility of the Trust's
management and are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and
Exchange Commission's rules and are not part of the basic financial statements.
This information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our
audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects as to the financial data required to be set forth therein
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
Arthur Andersen LLP
Washington, D.C.
December 2, 1998
<PAGE>
B.F. SAUL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION SCHEDULE I
(a) Required condensed financial information on the Trust is disclosed in
the audited consolidated financial statements included herewith.
(b) Amounts of cash dividends paid to the Trust by consolidated subsidiaries
were as follows:
Year Ended September 30
---------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
$5,200,000 $7,200,000 $6,800,000
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Schedule of Investment Properties - Real Estate Trust Schedule III
September 30, 1998
(Dollars in Thousands)
Costs Basis at Close of Period
Capitalized --------------------------------------------
Initial Subsequent Buildings
Basis to to and
Hotels Trust Acquisition Land Improvements Total
- ---------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Hampton Inn -- Dulles Airport, Sterling VA $ -- $ 6,512 $ 290 $ 6,222 $ 6,512
Holiday Inn Select, Auburn Hills MI 10,450 1,017 1,031 10,436 11,467
Holiday Inn, Cincinnati OH 6,859 2,719 245 9,333 9,578
Holiday Inn -- National Airport, Arlington VA 26,979 -- 4,229 22,750 26,979
Holiday Inn -- Dulles Airport, Sterling VA 6,950 20,239 862 26,327 27,189
Holiday Inn, Gaithersburg MD 3,849 15,270 1,781 17,338 19,119
Holiday Inn Express, Herndon VA 5,259 108 1,178 4,189 5,367
Holiday Inn, Pueblo CO 3,458 2,463 561 5,360 5,921
Holiday Inn -- Rochester Airport, Rochester NY 3,340 9,588 605 12,323 12,928
Holiday Inn -- Tysons Corner, McLean VA 6,976 14,553 3,107 18,422 21,529
Howard Johnsons -- National Airport, Arlington VA 10,187 3,180 1,183 12,184 13,367
TownePlace Suites -- Dulles Airport, Sterling VA 5,849 -- 219 5,630 5,849
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Subtotal - Hotels $ 90,156 $ 75,649 $ 15,291 $ 150,514 $ 165,805
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Commercial
- ----------------------------------------------------
900 Circle 75 Pkway, Atlanta GA $ 33,434 $ 1,707 $ 563 $ 34,578 $ 35,141
1000 Circle 75 Pkway, Atlanta GA 2,820 1,049 248 3,621 3,869
1100 Circle 75 Pkway, Atlanta GA 22,746 1,932 419 24,259 24,678
8201 Greensboro, Tysons Corner VA 28,890 3,526 1,633 30,783 32,416
Commerce Ctr-Ph II, Ft Lauderdale FL 4,266 727 782 4,211 4,993
Dulles North, Loudoun County VA -- 5,782 507 5,275 5,782
Metairie Tower, Metairie LA 2,729 649 403 2,975 3,378
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Subtotal - Commercial $ 94,885 $ 15,372 $ 4,555 $ 105,702 $ 110,257
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Schedule of Investment Properties - Real Estate Trust (Continued) Schedule III-Continued
September 30, 1998
(Dollars in Thousands)
Costs Basis at Close of Period
Capitalized --------------------------------------------
Initial Subsequent Buildings
Basis to to and
Purchase-Leasebacks Trust Acquisition Land Improvements Total
- ---------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Chateau di Jon, Metairie, LA $ 1,125 $ -- $ 1,125 $ -- $ 1,125
Country Club, Knoxville, TN 500 -- 500 -- 500
Houston Mall, Warner Robbins, GA 650 -- 650 -- 650
Old National, Atlanta, GA 550 -- 550 -- 550
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Subtotal - Purchase-Leasebacks $ 2,825 $ -- $ 2,825 $ -- $ 2,825
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Miscellaneous investments $ 250 $ 814 $ 250 $ 814 $ 1,064
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Total Income-Producing Properties $ 188,116 $ 91,835 $ 22,921 $ 257,030 $ 279,951
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Land Parcels
- ----------------------------------------------------
Arvida Park of Commerce,
Boca Raton, FL $ 7,378 (1,817) $ 5,561 $ -- $ 5,561
Avenel, Gaithersburg, MD 361 (144) 217 -- 217
Church Road, Loudoun Co., VA 2,586 2,380 4,966 -- 4,966
Circle 75, Atlanta, GA 12,927 4,300 17,227 -- 17,227
Flagship Centre, Rockville, MD 1,729 39 1,768 -- 1,768
Holiday Inn - Auburn Hills, Auburn Hills MI 656 219 875 -- 875
Holiday Inn - Rochester, Roch., NY 68 -- 68 -- 68
Overland Park, Overland Park, KA 3,771 398 4,169 -- 4,169
Commerce Center, Ft. Laud., FL 2,203 20 2,223 -- 2,223
Sterling Blvd., Loudoun Co., VA 505 2,531 3,036 -- 3,036
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Subtotal $ 32,184 $ 7,926 $ 40,110 $ -- $ 40,110
------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
Total Investment Properties $ 220,300 $ 99,761 $ 63,031 $ 257,030 $ 320,061
============= ============== ============ ================= =============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Schedule of Investment Properties - Real Estate Trust (Continued) Schedule III-Continued
September 30, 1998
(Dollars in Thousands)
Buildings
and
Improvements
Accumulated Related Date of Date Depreciable
Hotels Depreciation Debt Construction Acquired Lives (Years)
- ---------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Hampton Inn -- Dulles Airport, Sterling VA $ 2,613 $ 6,864 1987 4/87 31.5
Holiday Inn Select, Auburn Hills MI 1,557 12,606 1989 11/94 31.5
Holiday Inn, Cincinnati OH 5,172 6,291 1975 2/76 40
Holiday Inn -- National Airport, Arlington VA 503 17,752 1959 12/97 39
Holiday Inn -- Dulles Airport, Sterling VA 12,509 11,644 1971 11/84 28
Holiday Inn, Gaithersburg MD 7,767 6,520 1972 6/75 45
Holiday Inn Express, Herndon VA 305 5,097 1987 10/96 40
Holiday Inn, Pueblo CO 2,953 4,859 1973 3/76 40
Holiday Inn -- Rochester Airport, Rochester NY 6,322 12,651 1975 3/76 40
Holiday Inn -- Tysons Corner, McLean VA 7,989 14,913 1971 6/75 47
Howard Johnsons -- National Airport, Arlington VA 5,935 8,598 1973 11/83 30
TownePlace Suites -- Dulles Airport, Sterling VA 29 4,122 1998 8/98 40
------------- --------------
Subtotal - Hotels $ 53,654 $ 111,917
------------- --------------
Commercial
- ----------------------------------------------------
900 Circle 75 Pkway, Atlanta GA $ 13,373 $ 20,279 1985 12/85 35
1000 Circle 75 Pkway, Atlanta GA 2,107 3,274 1974 4/76 40
1100 Circle 75 Pkway, Atlanta GA 11,670 14,071 1982 9/82 40
8201 Greensboro, Tysons Corner VA 10,569 33,613 1985 4/86 35
Commerce Ctr-Ph II, Ft Lauderdale FL 1,614 2,865 1986 1/87 35
Dulles North, Loudoun County VA 1,286 3,001 1990 10/90 31.5
Metairie Tower, Metairie LA 1,652 -- 1974 11/76 40
------------- --------------
Subtotal - Commercial $ 42,271 $ 77,103
------------- --------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Consolidated Schedule of Investment Properties - Real Estate Trust (Continued) Schedule III-Continued
September 30, 1998
(Dollars in Thousands)
Buildings
and
Improvements
Accumulated Related Date of Date Depreciable
Purchase-Leasebacks Depreciation Debt Construction Acquired Lives (Years)
- ---------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------ ----------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Chateau di Jon, Metairie, LA $ -- $ -- 11/73
Country Club, Knoxville, TN -- -- 5/76
Houston Mall, Warner Robbins, GA -- -- 2/72
Old National, Atlanta, GA -- -- 8/71
------------- --------------
Subtotal - Purchase-Leasebacks $ -- $ --
------------- --------------
Miscellaneous investments $ 147 $ --
------------- --------------
Total Income-Producing Properties $ 96,072 $ 189,020
------------- --------------
Land Parcels
- ----------------------------------------------------
Arvida Park of Commerce,
Boca Raton, FL $ -- $ -- 12/84 & 5/85
Avenel, Gaithersburg, MD -- -- 12/76
Church Road, Loudoun Co., VA -- 9,791 9/84 & 4/85
Circle 75, Atlanta, GA -- 312 2/77 & 1/84
Flagship Centre, Rockville, MD -- -- 8/85
Holiday Inn - Auburn Hills, Auburn Hills MI -- 410 7/97
Holiday Inn - Rochester, Roch., NY -- -- 9/86
Overland Park, Overland Park, KA -- -- 1/77 & 2/85
Commerce Center, Ft. Laud., FL -- -- 10/83 & 8/84
Sterling Blvd., Loudoun Co., VA -- -- 4/84
------------- --------------
Subtotal $ -- $ 10,513
------------- --------------
Total Investment Properties $ 96,072 $ 199,533
============= ==============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Schedule III (Continued)
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - REAL ESTATE TRUST
NOTES:
(1) See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for basis of recording
investment properties and computing depreciation. Investment
properties are discussed in Note 3 to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(2) A reconciliation of the basis of investment properties and accumulated
depreciation follows.
BASIS OF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(In thousands)
For The Year Ended September 30
------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------------- -------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Basis of investment properties
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at beginning of period $ 284,610 $ 274,208 $ 277,385
Additions (reductions) during the period:
Capital expenditures 34,079 12,069 7,408
Sales - nonaffiliates (415) (525) (5,382)
Transferred from construction in progress 2,681 -- --
Other (894) (1,142) (5,203)
------------------- -------------------- -------------------
Balance at end of period $ 320,061 $ 284,610 $ 274,208
=================== ==================== ===================
Accumulated depreciation
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at beginning of period $ 85,915 $ 76,513 $ 75,140
Additions (reductions) during the period:
Depreciation expense 11,170 10,543 10,020
Sales - nonaffiliates (216) -- (3,441)
Other (797) (1,141) (5,206)
------------------- -------------------- -------------------
Balance at end of period $ 96,072 $ 85,915 $ 76,513
=================== ==================== ===================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Trust has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust
April 7, 1999 Ross E. Heasley
--------------------------
Ross E. Heasley
Vice President (Principal Accounting Officer)
