STRATUS FUND INC
40-17F2, 1998-01-23
Previous: QUALITY SEMICONDUCTOR INC, DEF 14A, 1998-01-23
Next: CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC, S-8, 1998-01-23







                     U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM N-17f-2



   Certificate  of  Accounting of Securities  and Similar  Investments  in the
                 Custody of Management Investment Companies



                    Pursuant to Rule 17f-2 (17 CFR 270.17f-2)



Date examination completed:  October 31, 1997



1.    Investment Company Act File Number                811-6259


2.    State Identification Number:                      NE


3.    Exact number of investment company as
      specified in registration statement:              5


4.    Address of principal executive office:            Stratus Fund, Inc.
                                                        200 Centre Terrace
                                                        1225 L Street
                                                        Lincoln, NE  68508




<PAGE>


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT


Board of Directors
Stratus Fund, Inc.
Lincoln, Nebraska

We are the auditors of Stratus Fund, Inc. (the Fund). Union Bank & Trust Company
(Union  Bank),  a  related  entity,  is  custodian  of the  Fund and the Fund is
therefore  subject to the provisions of Rule 17f-2 under the Investment  Company
Act of 1940.  Accordingly,  we have,  without  prior notice to the Fund or Union
Bank,  accounted for the Fund's  investment  securities held by Union Bank as of
the close of business on October 31, 1997. It is understood  that this report is
solely for the use of management  and for the  information of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and should not be used for any other purpose.

Union Bank,  in addition to acting as custodian  for the Fund,  is custodian for
other  customers.  Agents of Union Bank  hold,  or  account  for by book  entry,
securities which are the responsibility of Union Bank through custodian or trust
arrangements.  Securities held by agents of Union Bank, while identified by such
agents as being deposited by Union Bank,  cannot be identified by such agents as
to the  specific  customers of Union Bank who have  securities  included in such
deposits.

Union Bank  represented to us that the  securities  owned by the Fund on October
31, 1997 were held for the account of Union Bank by Fifth Third Bank, or, in the
case of Fund  investments  in  other  registered  investment  companies,  by the
investment  company.  We obtained  confirmations  from Fifth  Third Bank,  other
registered investment  companies,  and brokers relative to pending trades of the
securities  held for the account of the Fund as of October 31, 1997. We reviewed
Union Bank's  reconciliation  of the  securities  confirmations  to Union Bank's
internal  records,  identifying  securities  held by Fifth  Third  Bank or other
registered  investment  companies  as part of Union  Bank's  aggregate  security
position.  We also  reviewed  Union Bank's  records which show the owners of the
securities held by Fifth Third Bank or other registered investment companies for
the account of Union Bank at October 31, 1997.  We determined  that  securities,
identified by such records as the property of the Fund,  were in agreement  with
the Fund's  records of  securities  owned at October 31, 1997. We also agreed an
analysis of portfolio  transactions  recorded subsequent to June 30, 1997 in the
investment  accounts to  supporting  records and  verified a sample of portfolio
security transactions to supporting records and documentation.



<PAGE>


Because the above  procedures were not sufficient to constitute an audit made in
accordance  with generally  accepted  auditing  standards,  we do not express an
opinion on the investment  accounts  referred to above as of the date indicated.
In  connection  with the  procedures  referred to above,  no matters came to our
attention  that  caused us to  believe  that the  specified  accounts  should be
adjusted.  Had we performed additional procedures or had we made an audit of the
financial  statements of the Fund in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards,  matters  might  have  come to our  attention  that  would  have been
reported to you. This report relates only to the investments specified above and
does not extend to the financial  statements  of the Fund,  taken as a whole for
any date or period.





Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Lincoln, Nebraska
November 17, 1997




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission